HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-04-23 PEC0 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
TOWN OF VA10 April 23, 2018, 1:00 PM
Town Council Chambers
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
Call to Order
1. 1. Present: Brian Gillette, Rollie Kjesbo, Ludwig Kurz, John -Ryan Lockman,
Brian Stockmar
Absent: Pam Hopkins, Karen Perez
1.2. Election of Chair & Vice Chair
Brian Gillette moved to nominate Ludwig Kurz as the Vice -Chair of the
Planning and Environmental Commission. Brian Stockmar seconded the
motionand it passed (4-0).
Brian Gillette moved to nominate Brian Stockmar as Chair of the Planning
and Environmental Commission. Rollie Kjesbo seconded the motionand it
passed (4-0).
2. Site Visits
2.1. 841 Vail Valley Drive - Vail Nature Center
3. Main Agenda
3.1. A request for the review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12- 60 min.
9C-3, Conditional Uses; Public buildings and grounds, Vail Town Code, to
allow for construction of a yurt or similar structure at the Vail Nature Center,
located at 841 Vail Valley D rive/U n platted (Ford Park), and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC18-0013)
Applicant Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer
Planner: Chris Neubecker
This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void if a building
permit is not obtained and diligently pursued toward completion or the
approved use has not commenced within two (2) years from the date of
approval. Any conditional use which is discontinued for a period of
two (2) years, regardless of any intent to resume operation, shall not
be resumed thereafter; any future use of the site or structures thereon
shall conform to the provisions of Title 12, Vail Town Code.
2. The floor plan and site plan included as part of the permit application
review by the Planning and Environmental Commission are illustrative
only. The precise location of the Nature Center yurt within the site
may be modified, however the size of the yurt may not increase without
a modification to this permit.
3. Approval of this conditional use is contingent upon the applicant
obtaining a Town of Vail design review approval.
4. Failure of the applicant to adhere to these conditions of approval may
require review of this Conditional Use Permit, including a public
hearing by the Planning and Environmental Commission, and may
result in revocation of this permit.
5. Upon the completion of the use of the yurt, or three (3) years from date
of approval, whichever happens earlier, the Applicant shall remove the
yurt and foundation and shall revegetate all disturbed soils with native
vegetation.
Neubecker began by referencing vicinity map of the site that depicted
the location of the existing Vail Nature Center building and the
proposed locations of the yurt and accompanying temporary toilet
facilities. The proposal will also require approval by the Town of Vail
Design Review Board (DRB). Neubecker defined "yurt" for the
commissioners. He then stated that the proposed yurt will be 27' in
diameter. He also discussed the changes that will be required to make
the site compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
As the request is for a conditional use permit, Neubecker stated that
staff does not anticipate any negative impacts on or off the site.
Neubecker summarized the conditions of approval recommended in the
staff memo.
Kurz —Asked Neubecker to confirm the foundation for the proposed
yurt. Neubecker stated that while the rendering depicts a wood deck
base, the actual base will be concrete. Greg Hall, Director of Public
Works, stated that it will be a traditional concrete deck about the same
size as the footprint of the yurt. Kurz followed up by asking the
location of the associated ADA parking. Neubecker and Hall both
confirmed that the nearest ADA parking is across Gore Creek and
close to the amphitheater.
Lockman —Asked for more information regarding how the site will be
made ADA compliant.
Stockmar —Asked if the concrete slab foundation will be removed when
the yurt is removed. Hall confirmed. Neubecker added that the
removal of the foundation is included as a condition of approval.
Kjesbo —Asked if three years is sufficient time to complete the project.
Hall confirmed, but stated that they could ask for an extension in three
years, if necessary. Neubecker added that the boardwalk is not part of
the conditional use permit, but it will be reviewed by the DRB.
Stockmar —Asked for more information about the existing conditions of
the Vail Nature Center building. Hall stated that the long term fate of
the structure is still under discussion. Stockmar asked for an estimate
of the number of visitors per year to the Vail Nature Center building.
Hall estimated in the tens of thousands visitors per year.
Public Comment
Gwen Scalpello stated that she is actively involved in the Vail Nature
Center. She stated that the building is an asset to the community and
she believes it is important for the Vail Nature Center to be able to
continue in operation this year. She reiterated that there is ADA
parking close to the amphitheater.
Greg Clifton, Town Manager, concurred with Ms. Scalpello in the
importance in keeping the Vail Nature Center program operational and
that this request is part of that effort. The decision of what will happen
with the building in the long term will be part of a public review process
that will begin in the near future.
Stockmar —Asked if the existing conditions of the structure posed a
danger to the public. Clifton responded that the structure does not at
this time pose a danger, but it will require improvements. The town is
being cautious regarding the building, thus the request for the yurt.
Gillette —Asked if the town was purchasing or renting a yurt. Clifton
stated that the town will be purchasing the yurt.
Gillette — Concurs with staff's recommendations
Kurz —Also agrees with staff's findings and recommendations. This
will allow a town asset to continue its operation.
Kjesbo — Concurs with the other commissioners.
Lockman — Finds that the proposal meets the criteria for a conditional
use permit. He expressed some concern regarding the use of a
boardwalk as a long term solution for accessibility.
Stockmar —Also concurs with staff's findings and recommendations.
He expressed that the Vail Nature Center is a valuable resource to the
community and encourages making the site accessible.
John -Ryan Lockman moved to approve with conditions. Ludwig Kurz
seconded the motion and it passed (5-0).
Absent: (2) Hopkins, Perez
3.2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for an Amendment 5 min.
to the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan, pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment,
Vail Town Code, to allow for construction of a new building at the Vail Nature
Center, located at 841 Vail Valley Drive/Unplatted (Ford Park), and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC18-0014)
This application has been withdrawn by the applicant.
Applicant Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer
Planner: Chris Neubecker
3.3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 90 min.
12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, concerning an update to the 1994
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC 17-0049)
Applicant Town of Vail, represented by Tom Braun, Braun and Associates
Planner: Chris Neubecker & Kristen Bertuglia
Neubecker began by summarizing the events of the previous
times the item appeared before the PEC. More specifically,
Neubecker discussed the March 26, 2018 PEC meeting and
the topics that were discussed and/or identified for review at
that meeting. Upon request, an implementation matrix has
been incorporated into the updated document. Other
changes to the document include: changes to maps to
increase legibility; clarification of language for Action Item
24; addition of key definitions; increased legibility of the
wildlife resources map; added language regarding
conservation easements and designated open space zoning.
Neubecker stated that some items have not been changed,
despite previous requests from commissioners or public.
Among the items that remain: the Vail Trail extension is still
included in the concept trail plan; minutes of the wildlife forum
have not been included, but the link to the forum will remain
on the town's website; minutes from staff and town consultant
meeting minutes will not be included; priorities will be
identified at a later date with direction from the Town Council;
and the document does not address changes to the
Designated Open Space zoning process. Neubecker
concluded by stating staff recommends approval of the Plan
update.
Tom Braun, Braun Associates, Inc., made a presentation that
summarized the planning process to date. He reiterated a
few of the changes that Neubecker previously referenced.
He stated that he and staff feel it is best to discuss
prioritization via an annual discussion with the Town Council.
He provided more information on how to address requests to
change the zoning process for Designate Open Space. The
Vail Trail Extension remains in the concept trail plan as it
remains a conceptual idea that may fit into public requests.
No construction of the trail would occur without thorough
research into the viability of the trail, its potential impact on
wildlife, and the examination of the overall context of
development within the town. Braun emphasized his belief
that concept trail plan brings a balanced approach to trails in
the town. He then made comparisons and contrasts between
this plan and the original 1994 plan.
Gillette —Asked what entity is responsible for purchasing
gates for trail closures. Greg Hall stated that the town is
paying for the materials.
Diana Donovan — Stated that the reason she and other
members of the public have been focused on the Vail Trail
Extension is because it is currently staked in the field and
construction was supposed to be completed by now. She
believes the proposed location is in one of the worst spots in
regards to its potential negative impact on wildlife. She also
does not believe the Vail Trail Extension will be a beginner
level trail. She does not believe the Vail Trail Extension
should not be included in the plan update. She cited Bill
Andree of the Colorado Department of Parks and Wildlife in
her opposition to the trail.
Anne Esson — Stated that she was impressed with the
amount of time and effort the commissioners have put into
this project. She is opposed to the inclusion of the Vail Trail
Extension in the conceptual trail plan. She also cited Bill
Andree in her opposition to the trail based on the potential
negative impacts to wildlife. She asked the commissioners
not to approve any plan that includes the proposed Vail Trail
Extension. She stated her concern the trail would have on
the peregrine falcons that nest in the area. She also believes
the trail extension will have a negative impact on Memorial
Park's peaceful setting. She asked that if the PEC were to
make a recommendation to the Town Council, that they
encourage the Town Council postpone hearing the item until
at least mid -J une when more residents will be in town.
Braun — Stated that the staked area referenced by Ms.
Donovan is from two (2) years ago, prior to the plan update
process. He pointed out that the plan also points out that
some social trails be closed, and specifically references
Memorial Park.
Lockman — Thanked the public for their comments and
thanked Tom Braun and staff for providing clear detail in their
response to public and commissioner comments from the last
meeting. He stated that the plan reflects all of the
interconnected issues in the town and is not just about one
trail or parcel. I n regards to proposed trails, he finds that the
plan specifically mentions the importance of wildlife when
considering any new trails. He agrees with how the plan
discusses Designated Open Space zoning and conservation
easements.
Kjesbo — Stated that he believes the plan has been well vetted
and that any previously open questions have been adequately
answered.
Kurz — Stated that he was ready to hear a motion for
approval at the last meeting, but the plan is even better in its
current version. He finds the plan strikes a reasonable
balance between economic development, recreation, and
wildlife preservation. He encourages the Town Council to
find funding for enhanced signage and other measures
established in the plan.
Gillette — Stated that he is happy with the current version of
the plan. He is ready to begin the next stage of the plan and
start implementing some of the suggestions and conducting
more in depth studies.
Stockmar — Concurred with Commissioners Lockman and
Kurz. He finds that the plan has been significantly improved
since the previous meeting. He is concerned about the
potential negative impact on wildlife that may result from the
proposed Vail Trail Extension. He is not certain it is a
necessary component of the concept trail plan. He concurs
with Commissioner Kurz that there should be a commitment
to public education of the importance of wildlife habitat.
Ludwig Kurz moved to approve. John -Ryan Lockman seconded the motion
and it passed (5-0).
Absent: (2) Hopkins, Perez
4. Approval of Minutes
4.1. April 9, 2018 PEC Results
5. Adjournment
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of
Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the
site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission
will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Please call 711 for sign language interpretation 48 hour
prior to meeting time.
Community Development Department
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 23, 2018
ITEM/TOPIC:
A request for the review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses; Public buildings and grounds,
Vail Town Code, to allow for construction of a yurt or similar structure at the Vail Nature Center, located at 841 Vail Valley
Drive/Unplatted (Ford Park), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC18-0013)
OTTOCHMFNTS-
File Name
PEC18-0013 Vail Nature Center CUP Staff Merr
Attachment A - Vicinity Map.pdf
Attachment B - Vail Nature Center Narrative.pdf
Attachment C - Vail Nature Center Plans.pdf
Attachment D - Photos COMBINED.pdf
Attachment E - Vail Nature Center Draft CUP.pdf
Description
PEC18-0013 - Vail Nature Center Staff Memo
PEC18-0013 - Vail Nature Center - Attachment A - Vicinity Map
PEC18-0013 - Vail Nature Center - Attachment B - Applicant Narrative
PEC18-0013 - Vail Nature Center - Attachment C - Nature Center Plans
PEC18-0013 - Vail Nature Center - Attachment D - Photos
PEC18-0013 - Vail Nature Center - Attachment E - Draft Conditional Use
Permit
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 23, 2018
SUBJECT: A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 12-9C-3,
Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 16,
Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a yurt
for operation of the Vail Nature Center during the repair of the existing Vail
Nature Center building, located at 841 Vail Valley Drive (Unplatted - Ford Park)
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC18-0013)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer
Planner: Chris Neubecker
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer, is requesting the
review of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a yurt for operation of the Vail
Nature Center during the repair of the existing Vail Nature Center building, located at
841 Vail Valley Drive (Unplatted - Ford Park). The proposed yurt and existing Vail
Nature Center are considered "public buildings and grounds", which are conditional
uses in the General Use (GU) zone district. Along with the yurt, the applicant proposes
to install portable toilets and a hand washing station. Improvements to an existing
pathway are also proposed to provide an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
compliant route to the yurt.
It is intended that the yurt remain in operation only during the repair and/or replacement
of the existing Vail Nature Center building, which has structural problems and also
needs environmental remediation. The repairs and/or replacement of the existing
Nature Center building are anticipated to take up to three (3) years.
Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends approval, with conditions, of this application subject to the findings
noted in Section VIII of this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The proposed 27 foot diameter yurt will be placed approximately 75 feet to the east
existing Nature Center building within Ford Park. The yurt will be set on a new wood
deck on a concrete foundation. Accessible portable toilets and a hand washing station
are also proposed to the east of the yurt, since the existing composting toilets in the
Nature Center will not be useable during repairs. The toilets and hand washing station
will be screened by a 6' tall wood enclosure. Improvements to an existing pathway,
including a section of new boardwalk, are proposed to provide an ADA compliant route
to the yurt.
The Nature Center site can be accessed by pedestrians along a path from Vail Valley
Drive, or from Ford Park near the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater via a pedestrian bridge
over Gore Creek. ADA parking is currently available near the Amphitheater, and the
existing path from the bridge to the Nature Center will be re -graded and improved to
meet ADA standards. Vehicular access to the site for deliveries is available on a dirt
driveway from Vail Valley Drive to the south and east of the existing Nature Center
building. Proposed improvements include re -grading portions of the driveway.
The yurt will be used by the Vail Nature Center for programs and displays during the
repair and renovation of the existing Vail Nature Center building, or during construction
of a new building, if necessary. The determination of repair or replacement of the
existing Nature Center building will be made by Town Council after a thorough review of
the existing structure, and any required mitigation or structural improvements to bring
the building up to current Building Code standards.
Summary of Applicant's Proposal
• Installation of a 27 foot diameter yurt
• Installation of 2 accessible portable toilets and hand wash stations
• Wooden screens for the portable toilets
• Trail improvements, including construction of 104' of boardwalk
• Driveway re -grading
A vicinity map (Attachment A), a copy of the applicant's narrative (Attachment B), yurt
plans (Attachment C), site photos (Attachment D) and a draft conditional use permit
(Attachment E) have been attached for reference.
III. BACKGROUND
The Ford Park site was acquired by the Town of Vail in April of 1973 for the purpose of
improving the quality of life in the community. This 39 acre park site represented the last
remaining parcel of land central to use by all residents and visitors of the Vail
community. The property, known at the time as the Antholz Ranch, was acquired on
April 3, 1973 via Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973. The ordinance identified numerous
potential uses for the site, including the following:
Town of Vail Page 2
• for park and greenbelt purposes,
• to preserve the natural and physical character of the area to be condemned,
• for bicycle, equestrian and hiking trails,
• for children's playground,
• for performing arts and civic center,
• for a ski lift and related facilities,
• for picnic areas,
• for recreational facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools, gymnasium, ice
skating rink,
• for theater and assembly halls, convention center, public schools,
• for possible exchange or trade of condemned land, or a portion thereof, with
other property which may exactly meet the needs of the town, and
• to construct and maintain water works, transportation systems, and other public
utilities relating to public health, safety, and welfare.
In August of 1973, the Vail Plan was completed, which was designed to control the
growth and development of the community, and also contained a chapter on the town
recreation system. The Antholz Ranch property was mentioned as the only site
available that could satisfy the space needs for the planned recreation uses.
In January of 1977, the Vail Town Council adopted Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977,
naming the property commonly known as the Antholz Ranch as Gerald R. Ford Park in
appreciation of President Ford's contributions to the community.
In August of 1985 the Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan
Development Final Report was completed. The Ford Park Master Plan was adopted by
Council via Resolution No. 19, Series of 1985. The purpose of the master plan was to
guide the future development of these parks and establish guidelines for the
implementation of improvements.
On November 3, 1987, the Town Council adopted Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987,
which designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an area to be preserved
as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history. Vehicular traffic was restricted and
certain policies and procedures for preservation and maintenance of the grounds and
facilities were established with the resolution.
IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Vail Town Code — Article C — General Use
12-9C-1: PURPOSE:
The general use district is intended to provide sites for public and quasi -public uses
which, because of their special characteristics, cannot be appropriately regulated by the
development standards prescribed for other zoning districts, and for which development
standards especially prescribed for each particular development proposal or project are
Town of Vail Page 3
necessary to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12-1-2 of this title and to
provide for the public welfare. The general use district is intended to ensure that public
buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi -public uses permitted in the district are
appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail,
to harmonize with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other structures,
to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the
permitted types of uses.
12-9C-3: CONDITIONAL USES:
A. Generally. The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the GU district,
subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of
chapter 16 of this title:
Child daycare centers.
Equestrian trails.
Golf courses.
Healthcare facilities.
Helipad for emergency and/or community use.
Major arcades.
Plant and tree nurseries, and associated structures, excluding the sale of trees or
other nursery products, grown, produced or made on the premises.
Public and private parks and active outdoor recreation areas, facilities and uses.
Public and private schools.
Public and quasi -public indoor community facilities.
Public buildings and grounds. (Emphasis added)
Public parking structure.
Public theaters, meeting rooms and convention facilities.
Public tourist/guest service related facilities.
Public transportation terminals.
Public unstructured parking.
Public utility and public service uses.
Religious institutions.
Seasonal structures or uses to accommodate educational, recreational or cultural
activities.
Ski lifts, tows and runs.
Water and sewage treatment plants.
12-9C-5: Development Standards:
A. Prescribed By Planning And Environmental Commission: In the general use district,
development standards in each of the following categories shall be as prescribed by the
planning and environmental commission:
1. Lot area and site dimensions.
2. Setbacks.
3. Building height.
Town of Vail Page 4
4. Density control.
5. Site coverage.
6. Landscaping and site development.
7. Parking and loading.
B. Reviewed By Planning And Environmental Commission: Development standards
shall be proposed by the applicant as a part of a conditional use permit application. Site
specific development standards shall then be determined by the planning and
environmental commission during the review of the conditional use request in
accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title.
12-9C-6: ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Additional regulations pertaining to site development standards and the development of
land in the general use district are found in chapter 14 of this title.
Vail Comprehensive Plan:
Following are the Recommended Actions from the Vail 2020 Strategic Action Plan
relevant to this application:
PARKS AND RECREATION
Goal #1: Evaluate current recreational programming, facilities and amenities and
ensure they meet the needs of all users on a year-round basis.
Goal #3: Conduct necessary capital improvements of Vail's current recreational
facilities and amenities to meet high standard of quality for users.
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
Goal #6: Education: Ensure the community is educated and aware of
environmental issues to encourage responsible environmental actions.
PUBLIC SAFETY
• Goal #1: Identify and address potential public safety threats that may jeopardize
the community's safety and security.
Ford Park Master Plan
Following are some of the Goals, Objective, and Action Steps from the Ford Park
Master Plan relevant to this application:
Goal #I.-
Protect
1:Protect the natural environment along the Gore Creek corridor and ensure that any new
use or building within the Park does not adversely affect the character and quality of the
Park or the overall experience of park users.
Town of Vail Page 5
Objective 1.1: Limit uses and future development to that which is consistent with these
goals, objectives and policies and is consistent with the Ford Park Sub -Areas and
Illustrative Plan.
Policy Statement 1: Maintain the variety of uses and facilities currently located
within the Park.
Policy Statement 2: Proposals for new (or changes to existing) facilities or uses
that would displace existing public uses will not be permitted unless there is a
compelling public interest or adequate alternative facilities can be provided.
Objective 1.2: Maintain all facilities and improvements in the Park at a high level of
quality.
Policy Statement 1: Any proposed development or change to Park facilities or
uses shall conform to the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan, including but not limited
to:
• Goals, Objectives and Policy Statements,
• Sub -Area Plans, and
• Illustrative Plan.
Policy Statement 2: Any new development or change to existing Park facilities
shall be reviewed for compliance with Section 12-11-6 Park Design Guidelines of
the Town of Vail Municipal Code, as well as other applicable Town regulations.
Policy Statement 3: Any proposed development or change to Park facilities or
uses shall provide a needed environmental, recreational, educational, cultural or
social benefit to the community.
Policy Statement 4: Maintain and operate existing facilities, uses and functions
within the Park at a high standard of quality reflective of the Vail Brand.
Objective 1.3: Preserve and protect the environmentally sensitive areas along the Gore
Creek Corridor.
Policy Statement 1: Uses and improvements within the Gore Creek Corridor shall
be limited to only those prescribed uses in the Gore Creek Preservation Sub-
area.
Policy Statement 2: No new buildings should be permitted within the Gore Creek
Preservation Sub -area.
Policy Statement 3: Any new improvements within the Gore Creek Corridor shall
consider the 100 -year floodplain and minimize impacts to wetland or riparian
habitats.
Town of Vail Page 6
Objective 1.4: Utilize Ford Park as a showcase for environmentally sensitivity and
sustainability.
Policy Statement 2: Sustainable design and environmentally "friendly" materials
and construction methods should be utilized on all new development within the
Park.
Policy Statement 3: Maintain, protect and enhance the environmental character
of natural open space areas.
Policy Statement 4: New improvements within the Park and the ongoing
management of the Park should be done using sound environmentally sensitive
practices.
Objective 1.5: Limit the number and scale of buildings and structures within the Park to
no more than necessary to meet the needs of park operations and to provide
appropriate services and facilities to park users.
Policy Statement 1: As an alternative to new buildings, encourage shared or
joint -use buildings and/or facilities among Park lease -holders.
Policy Statement 2: The design of new buildings or structures shall be integrated
with the land with a subtle, understated, low -profile in appearance so as to not
dominate the Park's landscape.
Objective 2.3: Maintain, and enhance where appropriate, the role of the Park in
providing facilities for the enjoyment and exploration of the arts, music, dance,
education and other cultural pursuits.
Policy Statement 3: Support the educational programs provide at the Nature
Center and the programs provided by the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens.
Objective 2.5: Enhance and restore the Nature Centre building and the landscape
surrounding the building.
Policy Statement 1: Limit vehicular access to only those vehicles necessary for
the operation of the building and educational programs.
Policy Statement 2: Uses proximate to the Nature Center should be limited and
shall be consistent with the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -Area.
Policy Statement 3: Restore the architectural and historical character of the
Nature Center building.
Town of Vail Page 7
Action Step 2.5.2: Complete an architectural inventory of the Nature Center
building to define steps that could be taken to restore the historic character of the
building.
Objective 4.3: Improve internal pedestrian circulation within Ford Park.
Policy Statement 1: New developments or other improvements in the Park shall
not diminish the quality of the pedestrian circulation system and when
appropriate shall include provisions to improve pedestrian circulation.
Policy Statement 2: Existing ADA routes should be enhanced and where feasible
new ADA access within the Park should be established.
Objective 5.3: Foster a spirit of cooperation between all leaseholders within the Park
regarding their use of the Park and how to collectively use and manage the Park for the
benefit of all.
Policy Statement 2: Decisions regarding proposals for new buildings or
improvements are to be made in the best interest of the Park and the Vail
community, not just in the interest of the leaseholder.
Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area
The Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area includes the entire length of the Gore Creek
Corridor that passes through the Park. The sub -area is more than 21 acres in size and
is generally defined by the park boundary on the south and the 100 -year flood plain, the
50 -foot Gore Creek setback and/or topographic features on the north. Gore Creek,
associated wetland and riparian habitat and stands of specimen trees are the primary
features of the creek corridor. Existing improvements within this sub -area are limited to
bridges, trails, utility improvements and the Nature Center.
The Gore Creek corridor is the Park's most significant natural feature and provides the
Park with delightful open space for the quiet enjoyment of nature. The corridor also
provides a critical pedestrian link to Vail Village. The designation of this corridor as a
preservation zone is in direct response to a number of goals and objectives from
previous park planning efforts. The preservation of and enhancement to this area is
also suggested by Goal #1 of this Plan. It is essential that adjacent uses respect the
natural environment of this sub -area and that effective buffers be maintained between
other more intensive uses within the Park.
It is intended that existing uses and improvements within the Gore Creek Preservation
Sub -Area be maintained and in keeping with the goals of preserving this area no new
buildings are to be constructed within the sub -area. Any other new uses or
improvements should be limited to those that will complement the natural character of
the creek corridor and will minimize impacts to this sensitive environment.
Town of Vail Page 8
Resolution No. 27 of 1987 designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an
area "to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history." The
resolution stipulated that "vehicular traffic is to be restricted and certain policies and
procedures for preservation and maintenance of the grounds and facilities" should be
enacted. It is acknowledged that the Nature Center will bring a certain level of activity
to this sub -area. Nature Center activity should be concentrated on the "upland" portions
of the Nature Center in order to minimize impacts to the creek corridor.
Improvements within the sub -area should be limited to low -impact improvements such
as soft surface walking paths, creek enhancements to improve fish habitat, fishing
access, re -vegetation and creek/stream bank restoration projects. In all cases such
improvements should be designed and constructed in a manner that minimizes
environmental impacts (i.e. avoid wetland habitat and wetland, maintain existing natural
vegetation, use of "best management practices'; etc.). The underlying goal of any new
trail development and/or bridge crossing should be to improve access in order to
enhance awareness of this important natural environment.
Utility improvements should not be located within this sub -area unless no other practical
alternative is available.
The Gore Creek corridor between the main portion of Ford Park and Slifer Square
provides important pedestrian access to and from the Park and Vail Village (and the Vail
Village Parking Structure). This corridor is heavily travelled and provides access to the
Park for many park users. Enhancing the walking experience along the corridor will
ensure its effectiveness as an alternative means of accessing the Park.
P'e52NOti01�
Fishing access to Gore Creek, while currently not an issue (i.e. excessive use from foot
traffic resulting in damage to riparian areas and vegetation), could become an issue in
the future. A creek access point was considered at the east end of the Nature Center
(using the bus turnaround on Vail Valley Drive as an unloading area) was discussed
during the 1997 Planning effort but was rejected as being contradictory to the intended
use of the Nature Center.
Town of Vail Page 9
An Action Step suggested for this area (refer to Chapter 4 of this Plan) is to evaluate the
benefits of establishing a conservation easement for this area or to apply the "Open
Space" designation via the Natural Area Preservation Zone District. The protection
afforded by either of these steps would define more permanent limitations on the use of
this area and in doing so establish a degree of permanence in preserving this creek
corridor.
The existing condition of the Nature Center Building and the surrounding area has been
a point of discussion. Potential improvements to the Nature Center are further
discussion in Chapter 6 — Ford Park Illustrative Plan.
Future Improvements
Future improvements contemplated for this Sub -area include:
• Enhancement and restoration of vegetation along the creek corridor, creek bank
stabilization and fishing habitat enhancements.
Enhancements to the walkway between Vail Village and the Park to include
improvements such as seating, art installations, etc.
Design and installation of park entry features at the three pedestrian portals to
the Park along the Gore Creek Corridor.
Initiate steps to improve the physical condition of the Nature Center.
Vail Town Council Action Plan 2015-2017
Our Mission: Grow a vibrant, diverse economy and community and preserve our natural
environment, providing our citizens and guests with exceptional services and an
abundance of premier recreational, cultural and educational opportunities.
Experience Goals — Deliver on the promise, Vail. Like nothing on earth (TM) that
also supports "preserving our earth,"in everything we do.
Town Council Priorities
• Vail Nature Center Plan
Initiatives
• Serve as a resort leader in developing environmental programs that respect
and preserve our natural environment.
V. SITE ANALYSIS
Existing Zoning:
Existing Land Use Designation
Mapped Geological Hazards:
Floodplain:
Steep Slopes:
Town of Vail
General Use (GU)
Park
None
Yes (Gore Creek)
Yes
Page 10
UI
Standard
Allowed / Required
Existing
Proposed
Site Area
Determined by PEC
1,655,286 sf
No change
(38 acres)
Site Coverage
Determined by PEC
Unknown
+627 sq. ft.
Setbacks
Determined by PEC
North (Front): +/- 410'
Front: +/- 400'
South (Rear): +/- 144'
Rear: +/- 128'
East (Side): +/- 945'
Side: +/- 850'
West (Side): +/- 1,295'
Side: +/- 1,300'
Gore Creek Setback
Minimum 50' from
80' to Existing Nature
105' to Yurt
centerline
Center Building
Deck
Height
Determined by PEC
Unknown
15' (from deck)
G FRA
N/A
N/A
N/A
Density
Determined by PEC
None
No change
Landscaping
Determined by PEC
Unknown
None
Parking
Determined by PEC
198 spaces (Ford Park
No change
Lot, plus ADA parking
near Amphitheater)
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Existing Land Use
North: 1-70 Right-of-way
East: Park / Low Density Residential
South: Park / Medium Density Residential
West: Village Master Plan
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
Zoning District
None
Outdoor Recreation;
Primary/Secondary
High Density Multiple
High Density Multiple
Two -Family
Family
Family
Before acting on a Conditional Use Permit application, the Planning and Environmental
Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town.
The Community Development Department finds the proposed use to be consistent with
the development objectives of the Town of Vail. Specifically, the proposed use
addresses several goals identified in the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Ford Park Master
Plan, and the 2015-2017 Council Action Plan.
As stated in the Ford Park Master Plan, it is the goal and intention of the Town of Vail to
maintain all facilities and improvements in Ford Park at a high level of quality. It is also a
goal to restore the architectural and historical character of the Nature Center building. In
order to preserve the character of the building, additional testing and repairs are
needed, including structural and environmental. During this time, in order to maintain
the educational and recreation activities at the Nature Center, a temporary solution is
Town of Vail Page 11
needed. The proposed yurt will ensure that this important public use in the Park is not
lost during the investigation and repairs at the existing Nature Center building.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public
facilities needs.
The proposed conditional use will have no negative impacts on light and air, distribution
of population, transportation, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other
public facilities needs. The proposed yurt will have a positive impact on parks and
recreation facilities by allowing the public to enjoy and learn about the natural
environment while the Town repairs, or replaces, the existing Nature Center structure.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas.
No additional parking is proposed with this application. The proposed use will substitute
for the existing Nature Center during its repair, and thus will result in no increase in
traffic or demand for parking, other than construction related traffic during installation or
the yurt, or repairs to the existing Nature Center building.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be
located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit will have no significant impacts on the character
of surrounding area. While the yurt is different in character from the existing Nature
Center building, the yurt is small and unobtrusive, and is located well below Vail Valley
Drive. The yurt will also facilitate the necessary investigation and repairs to, or possible
replacement of, the existing Nature Center building and allow for the nature programs to
continue during repairs.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the
proposed use.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an
environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this title.
Town of Vail Page 12
An environmental impact report is not required by Chapter 12.
VIII. RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and
Environmental Commission approves, with conditions the Conditional Use Permit for
a yurt and portable toilets within the Vail Nature Center, PEC18-0013. This
recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this
memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this Conditional
Use Permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission passes the following motion:
Conditions:
This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void if a building permit is
not obtained and diligently pursued toward completion or the approved use has
not commenced within two (2) years from the date of approval. Any conditional
use which is discontinued for a period of two (2) years, regardless of any intent to
resume operation, shall not be resumed thereafter, any future use of the site or
structures thereon shall conform to the provisions of Title 12, Vail Town Code.
2. The floor plan and site plan included as part of the permit application review by
the Planning and Environmental Commission are illustrative only. The precise
location of the Nature Center yurt within the site may be modified, however the
size of the yurt may not increase without a modification to this permit.
3. Approval of this conditional use is contingent upon the applicant obtaining a
Town of Vail design review approval.
4. Failure of the applicant to adhere to these conditions of approval may require
review of this Conditional Use Permit, including a public hearing by the Planning
& Environmental Commission, and may result in revocation of this permit.
5. Upon the completion of the use of the yurt, or three (3) years from date of
approval, whichever happens earlier, the Applicant shall remove the yurt and
foundation and shall revegetate all disturbed soils with native vegetation.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this Conditional
Use Permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission makes the following findings:
"Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of the Staff
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 23,
2018 and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and
Environmental Commission finds:
Town of Vail Page 13
1. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is in accordance with the purposes of
the General Use.
2. The proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be
operated or maintained are not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare
or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. The proposed Conditional Use Permit complies with each of the applicable
provisions of Chapter 12-16, Conditional Use Permit, Vail Town Code."
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Applicant Narrative
C. Yurt Plans
D. Site Photos
E. Draft Conditional Use Permit
Town of Vail Page 14
Mir
0 ATTACHMENT B - APPLICANT NARRATIVE
1
TOWN OF Volt'
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
vailgov.com
MEMORANDUM
Public Works/Transportation Department
970.479.2158
970.479.2166 fax
To: Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
From: Vail Department of Public Works and Transportation
Date: April 23, 2018
RE: Narrative for Conditional Use Permit for Proposed Temporary Structure at
the Vail Nature Center
The Vail Nature Center (VNC) is a 7 acre section of Ford Park along the south side of
Gore Creek across from the Ford Amphitheater and east parking lot. In 2015 the Town
of Vail, Vail Recreation District and Walking Mountains Science Center completed the
Vail Nature Center Interpretive Master Plan. This Master Plan is an internal planning
document not requiring Town Council or PEC approval. The document outlined a series
of enhancements and improvements to the programs, exhibits and facilities of the VNC.
In September 2017, to further the recommended improvements to the facilities of the
VNC, the Town of Vail hired Hopkins Architecture to perform an analysis of the VNC
building, a nearly 80 year old farmhouse structure, and site; evaluate current planning
documents related to Ford Park and the VNC (primarily and 2013 Ford Park Master
Plan); and research how the users, local and guests, and staff currently feel about the
VNC and how they envision it in the future.
This work, the Vail Nature Center Study, was presented to the Vail Town Council and
Vail Recreation District Board on March 20, 2018 and identified that the community and
guests hold the VNC in high regard and appreciate the programs, activities and exhibits
presented. However, most felt the facility would benefit from the upgrades identified in
the VNC Interpretive Master Plan and/or even more extensive improvements. The
analysis of the structure identified serious concerns regarding the structural
characteristics of the building and other problems including rodent and insect
infestations. These issues will require additional extensive planning, engineering and
design to develop a plan for the future of the VNC. At this point, given the seriousness
of the issues identified, it is in the best interest of the VNC program, users and staff that
the building not be utilized until necessary improvements or replacement can be
completed. The 2013 Ford Park Master Plan did not anticipate or consider possible
modifications to the VNC facilities or programs. The language concerning the VNC and
the Gore Creek Preservation sub -area, which includes the VNC, supports and
recommends retaining and upgrading the VNC but also recommends against new
buildings in this sub -area.
The Walking Mountains Science Center (WMSC) currently operates the VNC from mid
May through October each year. This application for a Conditional Use Permit to install
temporary auxiliary structures in Ford Park at the VNC will allow the WMSC to continue
the VNC programs until permanent improvements can be completed. The proposed
auxiliary structures include a 27 foot diameter Yurt on a wooden deck and a wooden
screen to house 2 accessible portable toilets and hand wash stations. It is anticipated
theses structures will remain on site for up to a 3 year period. The proposed location of
the temporary auxiliary structures is identified on the attached site plan. This proposal
for temporary auxiliary structures is consistent with the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan in
that it supports the continuation of the VNC program while the future improvements will
be a direct renovation or replacement of the existing building and not constitute a new
building within the Ford Park Gore Creek Preservation Sub -Area.
Town of Vail Page2
/ATTACHMENT C SITE PLANS
BEA
/
EDGE OF WA / —
// 8191
8f,90
// / / / // / ♦ // / 2.0'
// / / / // / ♦// / / EKY 1
1.2' 4' 0' 7RAL
1.5'
1.7' 7'
2.0'
100 YEAR FLOOD
1.5 2.0'
CR��� , .3' - - 2781- TE
1.2'
.000
/ /
/
/.000
//// /////
/0,
� �
// ��
/ _•q / /
/// '/5�'"/_
00000, //
.000 000,
.000 ///.000 /
/ /�
/.00,
.000 .000
♦/
/
//
000 .000 .00
.000
7RANS.�� �
♦///
F�OLE � ♦ /
.000 .000
.000 .000
//
.000 0000
F
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
\ I
x8213.84
E
BUS STOP
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 20 ft.
BLOCK WALL
80
LET
PINOS DEL NORTE
CONDOMINIUMS
5 -SENSES TRAIL
A- /.
5 9
BENCH )/�5/
// /
/
/
1.2' ' .2>eo
/ 0, 1.0' I� go // / ' ' 0
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
/ TRAIL
j
FORD PARK
18" C.M.P.
/� �'♦ / / ��/ //� //j%� //// j �/ // // / INV. OUT= 8217.3' /
i
��-8190
/
8195
/
x8193.68
i BLOCK WALL
8200
/000
8205
/
_ - I HAND RAIL
8215
f /
/
/
PAN
NORTHWOODS
CONDOMINIUMS
CQ
Ln
0
v
W
0
Z
Z
Q
0
W
Q
QQ
o
m
�
Z
o
?C
J
o 00
00
w
vu}
w
bB
°d W
_
P 0
x v
a
m = a
o 0n
L-
i
CQ
O
W
0
Z
Z
Q
0
W
QQ
o
m
�
Z
o
pRE
2 0'.
a
1 5 1.
' i
// BEACH
GRAPHIC SCALE / // *1 �� /
zo o io zo ao so / / / 1.0' �3
7 �. � ,
( IN FEET) �/ / / / 1.2'_ �/,
1 inch = 20 ft. / / / // / ' //
1.2
BEACH / 2.0' / 1/
1.
////
// /
/ /
�5 / ,� /// /
2.0' / / // I
1.0, / �3/ // /
1.3' I /
EDGE OF WATER�,/
1.2
5
1 1 I 6'
0
NCH �7 /// L I 6' 6'
16��0
2.5'
5—SENSES TRAIL
05
1.0
' /
. � i!/� Vic. . • %�
1/i / 8S //I / I /T\
� \
/ \ 1
1.2' 2.0'
( 1.2' I
2.0' 100 YEAR FLOOD
LAIN
EES n , .3' / / 6195
/ 1.5'
W094)- /
P� / — 82p1 8202
81195
00 7.2'
/ AMPHITHEATER SERVICE ROAD
11.0' 10.5'-
WOOD
0.5'-
WOOD /
/ STEPS GREENHOUSE /
/ ui 16.1' /
4ON IFCEk 1.5' `V 10.5'
W C U EO
/ 00
16.2' 06 18.2'
`� 02
82
/ INTERPRETIVE �
/ PLANTER CENTER/MUSEUM )
10T
/
/ PLANTER
�.6 /✓ ROOT/// / / /
CELLAR / // / // / 0 *'6,i22/i
HISTORY
TRAIL 8225
230
lZ
PNS/
8225
/ / / HISTORY
ki
TRAILS0/PRONE
//PED.
1.0'
///
ag,1.0'
�J
BENCH )/ �'�5/ / / / /
/
0'
��/ J � / _- ;;; / /� � / // /AL
' 1.2' 1.2' 1'2' / / / / // 5PN,
1 2' j/ / / / / / // //// / �f
SOCCER FIELD
1.0,1.0' i o
1 XA
15//�
100 YEAR FP OD
AIN , /
00
vv / / // i�BUS STOPS /i \
/FENCJ= / G SIGN
16
SPN
NATURE i \
CENTER r1 BUS STOP \
SIGN / i SIGN \
18" C.M.P.
CQ
Ln
Ln
SIN
�
0
v
n
s
N
W
Z
Q
Q
0
0
x
J
��77 ■'
m
U
a Qo
N
w
W
w
�j
Ln Co
Po i
X v
CO =a
/ ui 16.1' /
4ON IFCEk 1.5' `V 10.5'
W C U EO
/ 00
16.2' 06 18.2'
`� 02
82
/ INTERPRETIVE �
/ PLANTER CENTER/MUSEUM )
10T
/
/ PLANTER
�.6 /✓ ROOT/// / / /
CELLAR / // / // / 0 *'6,i22/i
HISTORY
TRAIL 8225
230
lZ
PNS/
8225
/ / / HISTORY
ki
TRAILS0/PRONE
//PED.
1.0'
///
ag,1.0'
�J
BENCH )/ �'�5/ / / / /
/
0'
��/ J � / _- ;;; / /� � / // /AL
' 1.2' 1.2' 1'2' / / / / // 5PN,
1 2' j/ / / / / / // //// / �f
SOCCER FIELD
1.0,1.0' i o
1 XA
15//�
100 YEAR FP OD
AIN , /
00
vv / / // i�BUS STOPS /i \
/FENCJ= / G SIGN
16
SPN
NATURE i \
CENTER r1 BUS STOP \
SIGN / i SIGN \
18" C.M.P.
CQ
SIN
�
o
s
N
W
Z
Q
W
0
0
QQ
m
U
Z
V
O
r
� r I
I /
_ / I
I I
I
/
.
/
/
/
/
/
CREEK
GpRE
EDGE OF WATER
—8191- I
8190 7 0' --j
r /
i
2.0'� ECOLOGY
WT 0 TRAIL
000
� n
*1.7' *1.0' / / / / j 5' —�/
0.11.3 �
I 2.0,
000
2.0' 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
L/,. o -o
7'
CREEK 1.3'
/ , 2' - 000/ / \ 8195 I / — Fu / / j ( — / / / — // // / / / /
p '� / I / �,�/8215/
820 / / /
wore- %� _�— �----� // iZo
TEPS —82p1 I / I I / / / / / 82
/ 8202 / \ moi, *''
r 0
1. / ,— / � �/ �/ $200
A. g / 7.2 2.5' / AMPHITHEATER SERVICE ROAD
11.0' 10.5'-
1. / //// / 5 SERVICE ROAD
0�
woo GREENHOUSE / / / 6' / / /j / / / // / 23 /
♦// N 16.1'
ON ETF 1.5' 10.5'
06
16.2' ao 18.2'
♦ 1 o'202
LECTRIC /
INTERPRETIVE / / / / / / / / // / TRANS. /
/ PLANTER / / / // /// / ///
CENTER/MUSEUM / � / /j/ /j / j // //// / j � � // // / /// / ✓ � � � � � � � �'– ` – �
— PLANTER / / j // / / ///// / / j / / j // / /j I -Z.0' 38 i SP
8205 / /// / /// // / j / / // // / / /LIGHT
POLE / BUS T
Cti
6' / /// / / / / / / / PHONE/
8204-
6'
s �.6' ROOT
/-AL
HISTORY
TRAIL / �6
25
_
�5r
6' /// /j% _ j %i/i / % j i/, / / / / / GRAPHIC SCALE
/,/�� 20 0 10 20 40 80
IN FEET )
1 inch - 20 ft.
/
//
30
30
CQ
Ln
SIN
N
r\
0
v
rlv
W
Z
Q
Q
N
0
0
v J
v J
��77 ■'
J
o CIO
N
w
a1}
wW
b)
�n c
w,
Poi
0 V
3 n
i
a
C
WT 0 TRAIL
000
� n
*1.7' *1.0' / / / / j 5' —�/
0.11.3 �
I 2.0,
000
2.0' 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
L/,. o -o
7'
CREEK 1.3'
/ , 2' - 000/ / \ 8195 I / — Fu / / j ( — / / / — // // / / / /
p '� / I / �,�/8215/
820 / / /
wore- %� _�— �----� // iZo
TEPS —82p1 I / I I / / / / / 82
/ 8202 / \ moi, *''
r 0
1. / ,— / � �/ �/ $200
A. g / 7.2 2.5' / AMPHITHEATER SERVICE ROAD
11.0' 10.5'-
1. / //// / 5 SERVICE ROAD
0�
woo GREENHOUSE / / / 6' / / /j / / / // / 23 /
♦// N 16.1'
ON ETF 1.5' 10.5'
06
16.2' ao 18.2'
♦ 1 o'202
LECTRIC /
INTERPRETIVE / / / / / / / / // / TRANS. /
/ PLANTER / / / // /// / ///
CENTER/MUSEUM / � / /j/ /j / j // //// / j � � // // / /// / ✓ � � � � � � � �'– ` – �
— PLANTER / / j // / / ///// / / j / / j // / /j I -Z.0' 38 i SP
8205 / /// / /// // / j / / // // / / /LIGHT
POLE / BUS T
Cti
6' / /// / / / / / / / PHONE/
8204-
6'
s �.6' ROOT
/-AL
HISTORY
TRAIL / �6
25
_
�5r
6' /// /j% _ j %i/i / % j i/, / / / / / GRAPHIC SCALE
/,/�� 20 0 10 20 40 80
IN FEET )
1 inch - 20 ft.
/
//
30
30
CQ
SIN
N
r\
o
W
Z
Q
W
0
0
v J
v J
QQ
p
v
Z
v
Q,11-
2. 0'
• • -- • — BLOCK 2
\ I
FORD PARK / —� �/ •
I
//
/. / BEACH I
UTILITY
EASEMENT I
0/
/ O � n
* . 2 / . 8
2.0' TIPI 2.0'
� 1.0' 8200
/ F
3 / �1.0' 1.0'
I \ 1.0' BENCH
8200
1.2' j� 1.5' � / / / MEADOW CREEK CH \ \ I 2.0'
/� / __<1_00-YEAR
i TRAIL I �
\ \ 1.2' / i / 100 YEAR FLOOD / \
' ' / / / 82 p5
2.0' %ilk .5' 9' / 2 / � / \
�/ --�
f —
EDGE OF WATER -\,, / 7 / �'/ / /
8210
—8215
1.2' y�� I
8200— ��i �7 STEPS 1-g� ---' ` 0
�j0' 822
2.
--ffl 5'
- --
/ ol
8210
f � I
E CRE /////��_--' i �/ / / ✓ / i / _ _ — _ _ _ _ �/ 8230—
GOR-
//jam
822*7_0
57
/
2.0'
7/ 823
6210
LOT 1
/822 %
X1.5' TRACT C
—� 2
8230
/ _-- --— �%
-- LOT 1
ELECTRIC�- 7
/M�oLE VAIL VILLAGE
SEVENTH FILING
g235
18" C.M.P.-A\
INV. OUT = 8232.3' 0 /
� � s
INLET
/ SERVICE ROAD /� -
/ — I
/ N o
/ I z
I GRAPHIC SCALE
' I I TRACT B
/Sp,N
VAIL VILLAGE, SEVENTH FILING zo o ,o zo 40 80
( IN FEET )
*2
' \ / 1 inch = 20 ft.
�\ X/
.5p.� BUS TURNAROUND \ /
TRACT A
VAIL VILLAGE, SEVENTH FILING
----
N
Ln
N
2
v
n
Z
W
Z
Q
Q
O
O
?C
��77 ■'
J
o 00
N
00
w
a:}
w
�
�!l 00 W
o
Poi
x v
V
V
N
N
2
0
Z
W
Z
Q
W
O
O
QQ
m
Z
o
�
o
Op-
"JO00.
1000"
00�
>00
0010
000
Olga
WWI
00
C4L*&*
.�i��e�ivv� �llow�,ae haia UeAa eI
.07 " �at�au.�
tAct--b-em&Odd
• pall W4HA = �_n,.3 0
CA 0 c,*, - 4 (p 0 e V:
6n��,U jOkbee c, w Cl�,t.+^C ceet r- n'e
YeT A- ~I c
I0
6
*kp k I
100
t.4. Je4e.?
00
Gpr
6.. 1w
&WdWAlk GeCh et• a'�o v��c �✓ad��"( -pie
�dv�►�S , curb el Silts
• eve &51 af6e+ ��f dp ck"la
94 lVir
• ptVKW4k
u(c,+iA 64t I Vep crmk Vw*4*1
cobbled t -b cls;' '- �. �s
tQ114
00
ram zo-
4w
TIP
Ar
7. Lai 44 C;
"A
0.
10I
m 0 low
W pow=
OWN
Wl
PK_,jv4clf_.,
III0
Ar
4eN
00
95.( 'es
!W
001,
...... ix.660
za
mom'',
---
000
40- �5 MOVA ------
illialikilogill
20
now
arop
KV
-mammon"..�...............W
Ou �!Rr
man C.
";I -.0mg. &;r�
P�
SAN
--------------- �SAN SAN SAN
SAN
........... -
z (71
O
z b�
= O
O
Qf O
D_
O
m �
I
� W
cn Q
M
c
Q
J -F'
c
N
U
Q
L
00 z
00
O >
N I
Q U
Q
cn
(D z
c O
a� Q
U
O
W J
0 O
z_
O Q
� o
/♦!
Al-
- .�
/i'/' / �' / / / / / / / / / - 7' / / �6
%2
�S // / / /
/ / / � 23. 00
/.
24.00/
_--_/
PT: 2+43.97 22.00
_
27.00/ / /
20.00=
/y,`� /
1/0 25.00/ l
-5.9'f / // //9.1 -rn
STA.=2+67.84" �/ o o C\4_-
OFFSET=0.00 ^q� ` 1250 / 0
Ch o o (IV
/
3+(0)0 � / �' /� -_ � / Qo .8223 -� 25.00/
/
O
O FGW=24.00
TOW=26.00/
RIPRAP COBBLE
1' THICK
FGW=24.00//
24.71
FES_ _ _ _ - - - - ■ TOW=27;04
+ice / / / / / INV.IN(S)=8224.04
N:1659803.39_/
�/ / E:2758744.30 /
FGW=25.00 /
// // / P 1 +62.9
//////��' /////' //�
/ / / / / TOW=28.58
/ / / '/ / 36.40LF - 18"�3o.00f /
HDPE @ 2.00% 0. 9.5'
3 4'f WIDTH BOULDER
FGW=26.00 / 82
7.8 2,5' TOW=29.68/ / " WALL WITH 4'± HEIGHT.
34.00/
,823
FGW-27.00.
"-CP FG =28.00 TOW=31.04 / / 34.29/ /
/ �� o TOW=31.28--- � /
/ / / / / / / / / / / \ \ / 8231 FGW=29.00 / 32.00/
TOW=31.43 / ----34.00/
'FGW=30.09 /-
/// j/// /�� I�// /// \ / �� 1 ,31.70 ELEC TOW=32.00 �
/ / / / � � / \\ / � ,8232- i���.
2.5' MANHOLE
STA.=1+16.99 -----
/ OFFSET=0.00 CROSS STORM-
/ / / / / - `\ ` / ELEV=31 .34 ,8233 SEWER BELOW 1 TYPE 13 VALLEY INLET_ - - - -
/ ELECTRIC - / 1 / RIM=8231.79
g23`+ a2�5 1 INV.OUT(N)=8224.77
� 1
1_,-N:1659767.19
/ -
// i 1 E:2758748.15
18 C.M.P.
1.0' \ ``-----___-/' INV. OUT = 8232.3'
11 /
/ I
N
` /SP INLET 11
SERVICE ROAD
Bp SPN
I
O -
I
10 5 0 10 20
SCALE: 1 "=10'
ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET
GRADING NOTES:
1. ALL SITE GRADING [EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, AND COMPACTION] SHALL CONFORM TO THE
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE LATEST GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, IF AVAILIBLE FOR THIS PROPERTY
AND SHALL FURTHER BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL'S "STANDARDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS," LATEST EDITION.
2. EXISTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN DEPICTED FROM BEST AVAILABLE
INFORMATION AND ARE SHOWN TO THE EXTENT KNOWN. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING GRADE CONDITIONS AT THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND
AT LOCATIONS THAT INTERFACE WITH EXISTING OR PROPOSED STRUCTURES AND NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT CONTRADICT THE ENGINEERS INTENT FOR DRAINAGE
PATTERNS, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM SLOPES, AND PROPOSED ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
THE ENGINEER WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGES TO THE DESIGN
WITHOUT PROPER NOTIFICATION.
3. ALL SPOTS ARE TO FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TOW = TOP OF WALL [FINISHED GRADE
AT BACK OF WALL], FGW = BOTTOM OF WALL [FINISHED GRADE AT FACE OF WALL],
4. TEMPORARY CUT/FILL SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED A STEEPNESS OF [1:1] (H:V). PERMANENT
SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED [2:1] (H:V) [UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE] IN AREAS TO BE SEEDED OR
SODDED.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED MANHOLE RIMS, VALVE BOXES, ETC. TO
MATCH FINAL GRADE.
6. MARTIN/MARTIN IS PROVIDING LINE AND GRADE FOR THE RETAINING WALLS SHOWN HEREON. THE
WALL LAYOUT/GRADING SHOWN IS PROVIDED TO THE WALL DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR AS A COURTESY.
THE WALL DESIGNER SHALL TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION ALL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS,
GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS, AND GRADING/DRAINAGE PATTERNS IN THE DESIGN
OF THE WALLS. THE RETAINING WALL DESIGN NEEDS TO ACCOMMODATE THE EFFECTS OF
UNCONTROLLED RUNOFF FROM UP -GRADIENT OF THE WALLS, INCLUDING HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE
AND EROSION.
z L^
�w
W f V
LJ. z
a - °°
O
z
z o
LU Q
zz " °
O
U
� � z
Z) O
Q Ln Qo
Z
0 o z
U N
Lu a
D z_
Ln
O Q
LU �
� o
LLL N
-iC7�
cc
o Cr)
W N
J w
ILLIJ
J
U v
W W
W
O O Cn
L^.L
I..L
z
a�
0
O
cn
a�
a�
cn
cn
0
z
0
W z¢o�
Q <Ld Doe
-
W 0! wx
z o cn
Q Qa-Jw
UJ �
W Q 0-
U
O
m m = =¢mow z
H-
���m z
O z J,,1.¢Q
O (n Q ¢=�o�
N � w � Ld Z o cn Z
o o owo=
J H ~
Z0U�
M m wp
oo � z
U =
�o� o
N o Ld
+ - = w p z Ld
U nmw-m
0-
N z Ld
O
CD Ld
Z J
U w v o
LLJ
� CD
Sheet Number:
VAIL NATURE CENTER
LOCATION 27' YURT ON SLAB
i I _
• r -
M.". LL,
�r
N
100 ft
27' DIAMETER YURT
COLORS: TINTED ACRYLIC DOME
TAN ROOFNALANCE
GULL (GREY -GREEN) WALL
--^� STAINED WOOD DOOR (1)
CLEAR PLASTIC WINDOWS (5)
CONCRETE SLAB - DIAMETER TO MATCH
YURT - NOT EXPOSED
W4.
ort -.r
Lx
— YL
r "
w� • .1.' 1��, .is�st tF{t �f�� ��'. yip. �' '-F
S � � f '� _ ��:�; mak• r" 'i.r� !� + �'i"{ _ r`,�a,} ^r
.. <. .t ,. .k\ •fie - � - Xr.✓`.
a•n. .. - rr�;
�(','� .wr f • ��¢, � +yam }� _
• � r, tp. �F. Vis. 1_ � i 1
-yip- cy-1��••sr+y\,�, -
J - .�E rr'iL .y 1-.{ f A �. �w i9 ur. •._ _r.+Or
�
?.'r, ��1'1MY?' : �YF,�d .�.
�'
'� :s
_ - �,1
`,
q.,,�
3 ' .:...
.��'�
_1� • '
•'S.
is
Ilk
TOWN OF
VAIL
ATTACHMENT E - DRAFT CONDITIONL USE PERMIT
Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado USA 81657
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
This certificate is issued confirming the approval of a Conditional Use Permit with the required conditions of approval as stated
below.
Permit Number(s): PEC18-0013
Address of project: 841 Vail Valley Drive, Vail, CO 81657
Legal Description: Unplatted — Ford Park
Expiration Date: April 23, 2021
Description of project: The Farmhouse Building at the Vail Nature Center is in need of improvement or replacement in order to
continue occupancy. This process will require several months of planning and design and public process. This application for a
conditional use permit is to erect a yurt and screened portable toilets on the site to accommodate the Vail Nature Center functions for
period not to exceed 3 years.
Date of Approval: April 23, 2018
Conditions of Approval:
1. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and diligently pursued toward
completion or the approved use has not commenced within two (2) years from the date of approval. Any conditional use
which is discontinued for a period of two (2) years, regardless of any intent to resume operation, shall not be resumed
thereafter; any future use of the site or structures thereon shall conform to the provisions of Title 12, Vail Town Code.
2. The floor plan and site plan included as part of the permit application review by the Planning and Environmental Commission
are illustrative only. The precise location of the Nature Center yurt within the site may be modified, however the size of the
yurt may not increase without a modification to this permit.
3. Approval of this conditional use is contingent upon the applicant obtaining a Town of Vail design review approval.
4. Failure of the applicant to adhere to these conditions of approval may require review of this Conditional Use Permit, including
a public hearing by the Planning & Environmental Commission, and may result in revocation of this permit.
5. Upon the completion of the use of the yurt, or three (3) years from date of approval, whichever happens earlier, the Applicant
shall remove the yurt and foundation and shall revegetate all disturbed soils with native vegetation.
Note: Violation of the above conditions of approval or other violations of the Town of Vail Municipal Code may result in suspension
or termination of this permit.
Director of Community Development
Date
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 23, 2018
ITEM/TOPIC:
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for an Amendment to the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan, pursuant to Section
12-3-7 Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for construction of a new building at the Vail Nature Center, located at 841 Vail Valley
Drive/Unplatted (Ford Park), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC18-0014)
This application has been withdrawn by the applicant.
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 23, 2018
ITEM/TOPIC:
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, concerning an
update to the 1994 Comprehensive Open Lands Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC17-0049)
OTTOCHMFNTS-
File Name
Description
Open Lands Plan Memo 041218.pdf PEC17-0049 - Open Lands Plan Update - Staff Memo
Attachment A Draft 2018 Open Lands Plan Update REDUCED SIZE.pdf Attachment A - Draft 2018 Open Lands Plan Update
Attachment B - Appendix.pdf Attachment B - Appendix
Attachment C - Kathryn Middleton.pdf Attachment C - Public Comment
0) TOWN OF VAIL
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 23, 2018
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section
12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, concerning an update to the 1994
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC17-0049)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Chris Neubecker
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, is requesting a
recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the 2018 Open Lands Plan
Update (Plan), an update to the 1994 Comprehensive Open Lands Plan.
Please use this link to obtain a high resolution version of the Open Lands Plan:
https://www.vailgov.com/openlandsupdate
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicant, Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc., is requesting a
public hearing with the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) to
present the 2018 Open Lands Plan Update, and to request a recommendation to the
Vail Town Council on adoption of the Plan.
The purpose of this public hearing is to accomplish the following tasks:
1. Present the PEC with changes to the Plan since the last review on March 26,
2018.
2. Obtain public input on the draft Plan and revisions to the Plan as suggested by
members of the community and the PEC.
3. Determine any changes to the Plan that are recommended by the PEC for
consideration by the Town Council.
4. To request a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on adoption of the Plan.
III. BACKGROUND
On March 26, 2018 the PEC reviewed the most recent draft (dated March 26, 2018) of
the 2018 Open Lands Plan Update. At that meeting, the Community Development
Department recommended approval of the Plan with some additions and edits as
included in a document called Attachment C, Implementation Actions, Corrections,
Errors and Clarifications. Many of the recommended actions or steps listed in
Attachment C were proposed to be in the form of a chart or matrix within the Plan itself.
Other recommended changes included the addition of definitions for some key terms,
some minor edits, and a few clarifications to improve readability of the Plan.
In addition to the changes suggested by staff, several Commissioners suggested
changes to the Plan to improve readability.
IV. CHANGES SINCE MARCH 26, 2018
Based on comments provided by the PEC and members of the public at the meeting of
March 26, 2018, the Community Development Department has made several changes
to the draft Plan. These include:
• Creation of a matrix in the Plan with implementation steps
• Modifying the map of Privately Owned Land / Parcels for Acquisition and/or
Protection to improve readability
• Modifying Action Item #24 as recommended in Attachment C, and as supported
by the property owner, Vail Resorts
• Inclusion of definitions for key terms
• Correction of typographical errors in the Plan
• The addition of clarifying language where needed
• Creation of separate pages for Wildlife Resources Maps
• Addition of language concerning conservation easements and the Designated
Open Space process
• Addition of language on how the Town will use information from environmental
and wildlife studies and evaluations to make final decisions on trails
• Minor refinements of trail descriptions.
Following are some items that were suggested for changes, either by members of the
public or by PEC members, which are not included in the revised version of the draft
Plan:
• Removal of the Vail Trail Extension from the Plan — This trail idea was not
removed from the Plan because this is still only a trail idea that warrants further
study before making a definitive decision. The 2018 Open Lands Plan Update
seeks to balance both wildlife concerns and the desires of a broad range of
residents. With additional study and discussion, the Vail Trail Extension may
Town of Vail Page 2
eventually be removed, but until further studies are completed it is premature to
remove this trail idea from the Plan.
Minutes from the Wildlife Forum — The full Wildlife Forum video is available for
viewing on the Town of Vail website: https://www.vailgov.com/openlandsupdate
Staff does not believe it is warranted to also have minutes or a transcript of the
forum when the forum itself is available for public viewing.
Minutes from meetings with the Town's consultant — Staff does not create
minutes from every meeting with consultants, and we do not have minutes from
these suggested meetings. To do so would create an unreasonable expectation
and would divert staff resources from other priorities.
Inclusion of a timeline or priorities for implementation — Prioritization of the
implementation steps will be determined by the Town Council after review of a
work plan. The Town Council will be consulted on an annual basis. Without prior
consultation with the Town Council, it is not possible to identify a timeline or
priorities. Also, acquisition of properties, or implementation of actions, will
depend upon the participation of land owners and their willingness to work with
the Town, and upon availability of funding and partnerships.
Changes to the Designated Open Space process — Changing the process used
for labeling property as Designated Open Space would involve a change to the
Town Charter. The Open Lands Plan recommends the creation of a task force to
assist the Designated Open Space Board of Trustees. As part of their review of
lands that might be designated, the task force and Board of Trustees may make
suggestions to improve the designation process. At that time, changes to the
process may be considered.
Identification of a process to apply Conservation Easements — While the
determination and use of conservation easements may be appropriate for certain
lands and is suggested in the Plan as a tool for protection of lands, it is
premature to define a specific process. The Plan suggests that a task force and
staff further review potential sites for conservation easements, and as part of that
review a process can be recommended to the Town Council.
V. CRITERIA
Amendments to the 2018 Open Lands Plan Update require a public hearing review
process as outlined in Section 12-3-6 of the Town Code. The role of the Planning and
Environmental Commission is to make a recommendation to the Town Council on
adoption of the Plan, or changes to the Plan that should be considered by the Town
Council before adoption.
Amendments to, or adoption of new elements of, the Comprehensive Plan must address
the following review criteria:
Town of Vail Page 3
Adoption of a Master Plan
The adoption of an amendment or update to a master plan needs to be in concert with
the Town of Vail's Comprehensive Plan. The adopted master plan shall support,
strengthen, and further the development objectives of the town. To ensure consistency
with these objectives, the following factors for consideration are applied.
1) How conditions have changed since the original plan was adopted;
Staff finds that conditions have changed in the following manner since the adoption of
the 1994 Comprehensive Open Lands Plan:
• Significant population growth in Vail and in Eagle County
• Increased summer visitation
• Gore Creek is now listed on the State's 303(d) list as an impaired waterway
• Ever-increasing challenges with establishing workforce housing in Vail
• Development of regionally -oriented recreation facilities in down -valley
communities
• On-going redevelopment in Vail that has increased the density and intensity of
use on many properties
• A dramatic increase in the level of use and types of use on recreational trails.
• Completion of 38 of the 51 original identified Action Items
• Significant impacts on wildlife resources due to development and other human
activities
2) How is the original Plan in error?
The 1994 Comprehensive Open Lands Plan is not in error, but is 24 years old. The Plan
needs to be updated to remain relevant and consistent with the changing conditions and
goals of the community.
This update still achieves the original objectives and is consistent with the purpose of
the 1994 Plan. These objectives are:
To identify and develop strategies for acquiring or protecting key remaining open
lands in Vail that would be valuable for recreation, protecting sensitive
environmental resources, extending or connecting trails, providing adequate
neighborhood open space, and creating a small amount of contingency land for
unforeseen needs (e.g. employee housing, public facilities). These 'public needs"
lands, while included in this Plan, would be purchased from sources other than
the RETT fund.
3) How the addition, deletion, or change to the plan are in concert with the master
plan in general.
Town of Vail Page 4
Staff finds that the identified actions and supporting narrative of the 2018 Open Lands
Plan Update are consistent with the stated goal and objectives of the 1994 Plan and the
Town's master plan in general. Following are several ways in which the Plan update is
in concert with the master plan in general, and the Vail 2020 Strategic Action Plan
specifically:
Land Use
Adoption of this Plan helps to ensure that this advisory land use document is
updated and current.
The Plan helps to address environmental sustainability as a priority of the
community.
Parks and Recreation
The Plan helps to evaluate recreation opportunities on open space and trails, and
identifies potential partnerships with public, private and non-profit entities (such
as the U.S. Forest Service, Vail Resorts, Eagle County, and the Eagle Valley
Land Trust) ultimately delivering added benefits to recreation users.
Additional opportunities to enhance the trail network in Town are identified in the
Plan, including opportunities to link to existing trails on Vail Mountain and outside
Town of Vail municipal limits.
Environmental Sustainability
• The Plan identifies lands than can be used to maintain Gore Creek as a Gold
Medal Water, and that can help to implement best practices for sedimentation
and erosion control.
• The Plan helps to advance the Town's goals of educating the community on
environmental issues, and the role of opens lands in promoting environmental
stewardship.
Housing
• The Plan identifies vacant land for potential new employee housing.
Transportation
• The Plan identifies opportunities to expand the existing trail network which could
also be expanded to connect to a regional rail system.
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Town of Vail Planning
and Environmental Commission forward a recommendation of approval of the draft
2018 Open Lands Plan Update to the Vail Town Council. If any additional changes to
Town of Vail Page 5
the Plan are warranted or recommended by the Planning and Environmental
Commission, such changes should be included in any motion for approval.
The Community Development Department recommendation of approval is based upon
the review of the proposed amendments and the criteria outlined in Section V of the
memorandum, dated April 23, 2018 and the evidence and testimony presented
throughout the public hearing process. Staff believes the applicant has demonstrated
that conditions have changed since the Plan was adopted and that the 2018 Open
Lands Plan Update, as proposed, is in concert with the adopted goals and objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan in general.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of approval of the adoption of the Open Lands Plan Update, staff
recommends the Commission approves the following motion:
"The Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission recommend
that the Vail Town Council adopts the 2018 Open Lands Plan Update. The
recommendation of adoption is based upon the Commission's review of
the proposed Plan, as amended over the course of the public hearing
process and the finding that the applicant has demonstrated to the
satisfaction of the Commission that conditions have changed since the
original adoption of the 1994 Comprehensive Open Lands Plan and that
the requested additions, deletions, or changes to the Plan are in concert
with the adopted development objectives, as outlined in Section V of the
staff memorandum dated April 23, 2018."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of adoption of the Open Lands Plan Update, staff recommends
the Commission approves the following findings:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission hereby finds that the
proposed 2018 Open Lands Plan Update complies with the review criteria
outlined in Section V of the memorandum to the Planning and
Environmental Commission, dated April 23, 2018, and that the plan as
proposed is in concert with the Town of Vail's Comprehensive Plan, and
that the plan will support, strengthen, and further the development
objectives of the town."
VII. ATTACHMENTS
A. 2018 Open Lands Plan Update - DRAFT
B. Appendix to Open Lands Plan
C. Public Comment
Town of Vail Page 6
201 H OPEN LANDS PLAN UPDATE
A PLAN FOR OPEN SPACE, TRAILS AND THE USE OF TOWN LANDS
Text in reflects refinements made during the
-
Planning and Environmental Commission review
process and presented to the PEC on:
November 27, 2017
-- - _ . _ _ _ _.k -. _ - - �:� :�� - _�'�-. : ; • ti' March 26 2018
Text in jreen reflects refinements presented to
the PEC on:
ALkn--L:.... April 23, 2018
TOWN OFVA
An element of the Vail Comprehensive Plan
Adopted xxx, xxx, Resolution #xx, Series 20xx
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
TOWN COUNCIL
Dave Chapin, Mayor
Jenn Bruno, Mayor Protem
Dick Cleveland
Kevin Foley
Kim Langmaid
Jen Mason
Greg MofFet
Travis Coggin
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
John Rediker Brian Gillette
Ludwig Kurz Karen Marie Perez
Brian Stoc kmar John Ryan Lockman
Pam Hopkins Rollie Kjesbo
1
TOWN OF VAIL STAFF
George Ruther
Kristen Bertuglia
Chris Neubecker
Matt Panfil
Mark Hoblitzell
Peter Wadden
Gregg Barrie
Greg Hall
Sean Koenig
Suzanne Silverthorn
Director of Community Development
Fnvironmental Sustainability Manager
Planning Manager
Planner
Fnvironmental Sustainability Coordinator
Water Duality Education Coordinator
Landscape Architect
Director of Public Works and Transportation
GIS Coordinator
Director of Communications
BRAUN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Tom Braun
Tim Halbakken
SE GROUP
Gabby Voeller
Scott Prior
APW,-B «u N
•�}ti 1'L 1.111 � ILS
TOWN OF VAIL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
- Need to Update the 1994 Open Lands Plan
- Goals for Updating the 1994 Plan
- Approach to this Update Process
- Community Involvement
- Organization of this Plan
2. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS 6
- Community Input
- Environmentally Sensitive Lands
- Evaluation of Undeveloped Privately -Owned Lands
- Protection of Environmentally Sensitive Lands
- Designated Open Space Lands
- Conservation Easements
3. TOWN -OWNED LANDS AND USE OF LANDS 15
- Community Input on the Use of Town Lands
- Overview of Town -Owned Lands
- Land Needs for Public Uses and Community Facilities
- Evaluation of Town -Owned Lands
- Evaluation of Privately -Owned Lands
- Management of Vail's Open Lands
4. TRAILS 23
- Community Input on Trails
- Small Group Meetings on Trails
- Trails Community Workshop
- A Vision for Vail's Trails
- Evaluation of Existing Trails
- Wildlife and the Gore Valley
- Wildlife and Recreation Trails
- Mitigating Measures Prior to the Study of Potential New
Trails
- Conceptual Trails Plan
- Description of Trail Ideas and Opportunities
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
- Other Trail Improvements
- Trail Types and Standards
- Regional Context of Vail's Trails
- Process for Evaluation of Trail Ideas
- Easements From Private Land Owners
5. ACTION PLAN 41
- 2017 Action Plan
6. IMPLEMENTATION 50
- Environmentally Sensitive Lands
- Public Facilities and Community Needs/Use and
Management of Town Lands
- Recreational Trails
- Conclusion
7. APPENDIX
-1994 Open Lands Plan
- Status of Action Plan Parcels and Trails from the `94 Action Plan
- Summary of Action Items
- Summary of Real Estate Transfer Tax Ordinances
- Designated Open Space procedures
- USFS Process
- Trail Types and Standards
- Conceptual Trails Plan/Trails Dropped from Consideration
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife - Wildlife in the Gore Valley
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife - Wildlife Influence Area Maps
- Trail Scoping Session Minutes - September 2017
Community Planning Process
Community input was an integral part of this
planning process and involved the following:
• Three community scoping sessions
• Two community input sessions
• Trail -specific small group meetings and a
community wide meeting
Town -owned Lands and Use of Lands
The '94 Plan identified land needs for
Town facilities and uses and provided
recommendations for the use of eight Town -
owned parcels- Many of these needs and
recommendations have been implemented -
This update process included the evaluation of
all Town -owned lands to identify any parcels
that may be suitable for Town use- None of
the Town's vacant parcels are suitable for the
,� Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
• A wildlife forum
The 1994 Comprehensive Open Lands Plan was
• Use of the Town's web -based portal to
adopted to "identify and develop strategies for
obtain community input, and
acquiring or protecting key remaining open lands in
• Public hearings with the Planning and
Vail that would be valuable for recreation, protecting
Environmental Commission and Town
sensitive environmental resources, extending or
Council -
connecting trails, providing adequate neighborhood
open space, and creating a small amount of ^
Environmentally Sensitive Lands
. .. . -
contingency land for unforeseen needs (e.g.
The acquisition and protection of
employee housing, public facilities)"- This update
environmentally sensitive and other lands
. _•
process was initiated by the Vail Town Council du
was a major focus of the '94 Plan- During this
to the age of the '94 Plan and in response to many
update process community input was clear
conditions that have changed over the past twenty-
t the protection of sensitive lands remains
• 1 t 1 ''
four years-�,
a very high priority- In 1994, an evaluation
•
of all privatelyownedlands was completed
The broad objectives of this planning process were
that identified thirty environmentally sensitive
to:
parcels to be acquired and protected by the
• Confirm the community's goals for the Plan,
Town- A similar process was done as a part
a R _
• Evaluate Action Items from the '94 Plan and
of this update process- The updated Plan
�i
identify new Action Items tp further goals for
identifies sixteen such parcels (some of which
protecting environmentally sensitive lands and
were also recommend in the '94 Plan)- The
•,, - �'- ,
addressing other goals of the Plan,
Plan also recommends establishing a task
��
• Provide better direction regarding recreation
force to further study techniques for the
^
trails,
protection of environmentally sensitive lands
1c�_ , • = - '� -
Evaluate f iow Town -owned lands can be used
that could include increased use of the Town's
- _
to address community needs, and
Designated Open Space process and the use of
- -
r"
efine management strategies for Town -owned
conservation easements -
lands -
Community Planning Process
Community input was an integral part of this
planning process and involved the following:
• Three community scoping sessions
• Two community input sessions
• Trail -specific small group meetings and a
community wide meeting
Town -owned Lands and Use of Lands
The '94 Plan identified land needs for
Town facilities and uses and provided
recommendations for the use of eight Town -
owned parcels- Many of these needs and
recommendations have been implemented -
This update process included the evaluation of
all Town -owned lands to identify any parcels
that may be suitable for Town use- None of
the Town's vacant parcels are suitable for the
,� Executive Summary
development of public uses or community -
oriented facilities. It is possible, however, that
public facility needs could be provided by the
redevelopment of currently developed parcels
(e.g. the east end of the Lionshead Parking
Structure or the Vail Municipal Building site.
Four privatelyownedparcels are identified for
potential acquisition by the Town for future
public use or community oriented facilities.
Trails
Improving the trail and bike system was listed
as one of the top three priorities for open space
and recreation from the '94 Plan. Many trail and
trailhead improvements have been completed
since 1994. Trails remain a community priority
and this Plan identifies a number of potential
new trail ideas.
Wildlife resources in and around Vail have
been significantly impacted by changes in the
Gore Valley that have occurred since the early
1960's. The use of recreational trails can add
to these impacts. For this reason, this update
recommends that a number of steps be t
to improve wildlife resources prior to the
development of any new trails. These steps
include community education regarding how
trail use affects wildlife. enforcement of seasonal
trail closures, and enhancement of wildlife
habitat. Further, it is recommended that prior
to any new trail development a comprehensive,
site-specific analysis of how existing trails,
social trails and new trail ideas could impact
environmental and wildlife resources be
completed. This analysis will be used in making
decisions on closing or formalizing social
trails and on the development of any new
trails. The objective of this analysis is that any new
trails must balance the community's recreational
needs with sensitivity to wildlife and environmental
considerations by minimizing or mitigating potentail
impacts from trails.
Implementation of the Plan
Steps to implement the goals of this Plan are
provided in two chapters. Chapter 5 - Action
Plan provides a summary of all Action Items -
recommended land and easement acquisitions for
the protection of environmentally sensitive lands, fo
the potential future development of recreation trails
and for Town uses. Chapter 6 - Implementation
provides a summary of follow-up studies and
of other programs anctasks recommended to
implement the goals of this Plan.
ik
2018 Open Lands Plan Update I I Executive Summary
W',W
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
t..`
Pie Town of Vail has a long history of acquiring lands to preserve as open space and to develop park
facilities. Over the years the Town has also been diligent in developing a recreational trail system and in the
development of necessary public facilities. Toward that end, the 1994 Comprehensive Open Lands Plan (the
'94 Plan) was adopted for the stated purpose:
"to identify and develop strategies for acquiring or protecting hey remaining open lands in Vail that would be valuable
for recreation, protecting sensitive environmental resources, extending or connecting trails, providing adequate
neighborhood open space, and creating a small amount of contingency land for unforeseen needs (e.g. employee housing,
public facilities."
1
Chapter 1 - Introduction
In the spring of 2016 the Vail Town Council
initiated a process to update the '94 Plan.
The '94 Plan was developed over a period
of two years with involvement of the Open
Lands Steering Committee and after numerous
community meetings. The five objectives of the
'94 Plan were to:
• Identify a comprehensive system of open
space uses such as parks, recreation,
protection of environmental resources, trails
and to reserve lands for public uses,
• Prioritize available open lands for acquisition
or protection,
• Identify creative strategies to implement the
acquisition and protection program,
• Define a management system to
appropriately manage Town -owned open
lands, and
• Buffer neighborhoods with open space.
1994 Comprehensive Open Lands Plan.
During the development of the '94 Plan the
Town was involved in a number of related
activities. These included inventorying all Town
lands, revisiting open space zone districts,
working on a Land Ownership Adjustment Plan
(LOA) with the United States Forest Service,
developing an inventory of environmentally sensitive
open lands (with the Colorado Natural Heritage
Program) and proposing zone changes for public
and private parcels. The 1994 Comprehensive Open
Lands Plan served to integrate these efforts and to
provide a framework for these and other actions
related to open lands.
The main elements of the '94 Plan included an
Action Plan for the acquisition of land or easements
and other steps to protect sensitive lands and
further the goals of the Plan, a conceptual trails ,
plan, identification of public facility needs and
recommended uses for some Town lands, .-4
NEED TO UPDATE THE 198sta
EN
LANDS PLAN
The Vail Town Council directed Toupdate
the '94 Plan in the Fall of 2016_ Discussion of the
potential re -development of the Vail Trail was the
catalyst that prompted this update. Notwithstanding
wh the Town Council initiated this process, an
date of the '94 Plan was needed if for no other
reason than twenty-four years have passed since its
adoption.
There has been a great deal of change in Vail and
Eagle County over the past twenty-four years and
many of these changes are directly or indirectly
related to specific recommendations of the '94 Plan
Examples of these include:
• Significant population growth in Vail and Eagle
County,
• Increased summer visitation,
• Gore Creek is now listed as Impaired,
• Ever increasing challenges with establishing
workforce housing in Vail,
• The development of regionally oriented
recreation facilities in down valley
communities,
• On-going redevelopment in Vail that has
increased the density and intensity of use on
many properties,
• A dramatic increase in the level of use and
types of use on recreational trails, and
• Significant declines in wildlife populations
and resources.
Each of these considerations reinforce the need
to re visit the '94 Plan.
Gore Creek is now listed as Impaired.
GOALS FOR UPDATING THE 1994
OPEN LANDS PLAN
The Town Council specifically asked for an
update to the '94 Plan, and not an entirely
new open lands plan. As an update, it has
been assumed that the basic format and topics
addressed by the '94 Plan are valid today. As
such, the focus of this planning process was to
revisit all elements of the '94 Plan and evaluate
how they can be refined to better respond to
conditions in Vail today and into the future. In
di
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 2 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction
Existing section of the Vail Trail.
essence, the goal of this planning process Nfor •
to update the Plan to provide a framewor
effectively implementing actions to achieve
Vail's goals for the preservation of open space,
the development of trails and the use of Town •
lands.
The process for updating the '94 Plan was •
designed to address the following broad •
objectives:
• Confirm the community's overall goals and
priorities for the Plan,
Evaluate the Action Plan and identify any new
Action Items to protect environmentally sensitive
lands or other action to implement the goals of
the Plan,
Provide better direction for the potential
development of recreation trails,
Evaluate Town -owned lands for how they can
be used to meet community needs,
Define management strategies for Town -owned
lands, and
Protect environmentally sensitive lands and
wildlife_
APPROACH TO THIS UPDATE
PROCESS
The major steps in updating the '94 Plan
included:
Evaluation of the '94 flan
A critical review of the '94 Plan was completed
to understand the strengths of the Plan and
elements of the Plan that could be improved.
Community Scoping Sessions
At the outset of the project three community
scoping meetings were held. Information
about Vail's Comprehensive Plan, the '94 Plan
and related topics were presented. Participants
were encouraged to provide questions and
comments at these meetings and a portal was
established on the Town's web page as another
means for the community to offer comments on
the Plan.
Technical Advisors
Throughout the planning process, technical
experts, agencies and potential partners who
are involved in topics addressed by the Plan
were engaged. Examples of these include
Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Vail Resorts trails
staff, Eagle County and the Eagle Valley Land
Trust.
Evaluation of Lands
Extensive evaluations of Town -owned and
privatelyownedlands were completed to
gain a comprehensive understanding of these
lands and to identify the role they could play in
implementing the goals of this Plan.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 3 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction
Community Meetings
Two community meetings were held during the
planning process. These meetings focused on
various aspects of the update and allowed for
community interaction and conversation about
the Plan.
Recreation Trails
A series of small group scoping meetings specific
to trails and a community wide trails workshop
were held to better understand perspectives
regarding existing trails and potential
improvements to the Town's trail system.
Review Process
Following preparation of a draft plan, the
proposed update was reviewed by the Vail
Planning and Environmental Commission and
the Vail Town Council.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Community involvement played a significant
role in this update process. Input was obtained
during three scoping meetings, two community
meetings, a series of small group meeting's and
a community wide workshop dedicated to trails.
Small group discussion at second community meeting.
A portal dedicated to open lands was provided on
the Town's web page and input was obtained by
written questionnaires that were provided during
meetings. Community input was also obtained
during the formal review of the Plan by the Planning
and Environmental Commission and the Town
Council.
Input from the community during the planning
process was a major influence in the development
of the updated Plan. Trails are a good example of
Subsequent chapters of this Plan provide a
summary of comments that were heard from
the community during this update process.
In most cases a wide range of divergent
comments were heard. These summaries
are not scientific and are not intended to
suggest community consensus. Rather, the
summaries of community input provided in
the following chapters are intended to convey
general themes of what was expressed by the
community
how community input influenced the planning
process. During scoping and community meetings, ORGANIZATION OF THIS PLAN
many passionate opinions were expressed about
Vail's existing trails the need for new trails and the he ZO 18 Open Lands Plan Update includes the
potential impact from tail use on wild*- To better
understand how the community felt about trails and
to bring those with divergent viewpoints together
for discussion, small group sessions specific to trails
and a community wide trails workshop were held.
The SE Group, a design firm that specializes in trail
design and planning, was engaged to facilitate these
efforts. A wildlife forum was then held to discuss
the state of wildlife in the Gore Valley_ The effort
put towards trowas considerably greater than
originally anticipated and this effort was taken in
direct response to input from the community.
As with any community planning process, it is
often difficult to draw consensus from input that is
provided from the community. This is because in
most cases community members will have a variety
of different viewpoints and while some conclusions
can be drawn from opinions provided by those
who participate in a planning process, the opinions
of those who do not participate are not heard.
For many reasons, finding a clear consensus on
community goals is a challenging task.
following chapters:
1. Introduction
This chapter provides background on the
'94 Plan, the need, goals for and approach
to this update.
2. Environmentally Sensitive Lands
This chapter summarizes how the '94
Plan addressed environmentally sensitive
lands and community input during this
update process, defines environmentally
sensitive lands, outlines measures that
have been taken to protect such lands and
identifies additional lands that may warrant
protection.
3. Town -Owned Lands and Use of Lands
A summary of how the '94 Plan addressed
Town -owned lands, community input
during this update process, an evaluation of
all Town -owned lands and privatelyowned
lands (that could further the goals of this
Plan) are provided in this chapter.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 4 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction
4. Trails
Goals and accomplishments relating to trails
from the '94 Plan, community input during
this update process, a vision for trails, a
conceptual trails plan and subsequent steps
in the planning and approval processes for
any new trail development are provided in
this chapter.
5. Action Plan
The '94 Plan includes an Action Plan that
identified fifty-one Action Items to acquire
easements or land necessary to implement
the goals of the Plan. Many of these action
items have been accomplished. An updated
Action Plan is provided in this chapter.
G. Implementation
This chapter outlines implementation steps
and follow-up tasks.
7. Appendix
The '94 Plan and other supplemental
information are found in the appendix.
The 2018 Open Lands Plan Update provides a
framework for actions the Town can implem
for the protection of lands, trails and the
of Town lands. The 2018 Open Lands Plan
Update was adopted by Resolution No. XX,
Series 20XX by the Vail Town Council after
recommendation from the Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission. This Plan is an
element of the Town's Comprehensive Plan.
TERMS USED IN THIS PLAN
Below are definitions for terms used throughout
this Plan:
Conservation Easement — A voluntary legal
agreement between a landowner and a land
trust (or other qualified organization) in which the
land owner places restrictions on the use of his or
her land in order to protect its conservation values
Designated Open Space - Property owned by
the Town of Vail which has been dedicated by
ordinance as designated open space.
Easement -A legal right to use another's land for
specifically defined purpose.
Environmentally Sensitive Lands — Lan4 thit incl
natural features such as wetland or riparian habitat,
water courses, wildlife habitat, native plantr other
unique vegetation, steep slopes or er gckgic
hazards.
Land Trust - A charitable organization tha�quires
land or conservation easements, or that stewards
landoreasem�ts, for co ervation purposes.
National Environmental P Act INEPAI -A
federal environmental 10 -in the United States that
promotes the enh4ncement of the environment and
established the President's Council on Environmental
Ouality (CEO` NEPA requires Federal Agencies to
assess#e environmental effects of their proposed
prior to making decisions.
Open Lands — Vacant, undeveloped land that may
be owned by the Town of Vail or privately -owned.
Open Space — Lands owned by the Town of Vail
that have been assigned as Designated Open Space,
or Town -owned land or privatelyownedlands that
are zoned for open space or have a conservation
easement.
Pump Track - A soft surface cycling trail
consisting of a circuit of banked turns and
features designed to be ridden completely by
riders creating momentum by "pumping" the
bicycle.
Social Trail - An unofficial/non-designated
soft surface trail that has not been formally
approved by the land owner or applicable
review authority.
Task Force — A small group of people appointed
to a special committee formed expressly for the
of studying a particular problem for a
limited timeframe.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 5 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction
CHAPTER 2 -
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS
While the '94 Plan addressed recreational trails,
Town facilities and the use and management of
Town lands, the identification of environmentally
sensitive lands and recommendations for their
acquisition and protection was the primary focus of*
the Plan- The '94 Plan's focus on environmentally 1
sensitive lands is evident a number of ways- Two of
uses or facilities or how the lands could be
protected as open space- Open space generally
refers to lands owned by the Town that have
been assigned as Designated Open Space, or
Town -owned or privatelyownedlands that are
zoned for open space or have a conservation
easement- Open space is also used to refer to
the five objectives of the '94 Plan were to "prioritize lands recommended by this Plan for acquisition
available open lands for acquisition or protection"" by the Town for protection as open space, or
and to ""identify creative strategies to implement the ately-owned lands that may be appropriate
acquisition and protection program"- The number or conservation easements or other protection
one priority for recreation and open space is to
"acquire, preserve and protect natural open space"
and the top priority for land acquisitions is to "�rotect
sensitive natural habitat areas, riparian areas and
hazard areas -Thirty of the fifty-one Action Items
from the '94 Action Plan involve the acquisition
and protection of environmentally sensitive lands
and over half of the Action Items that have been
implemented have resulted in the acquisition and
preservation of such lands -
Since its adoption, the '94 Plan has been regarded by
some as an "open space plan While the '94 Plan is
far more than just an open space plan, the emphasis
of the '94 Plan is clearly on the preservation of
environmentally sensitive and other open space
lands -
The terms "open lands" and "open space" are used
throughout this Plan- When used, open lands refer
to vacant, undeveloped land that may be owned
by the Town or privately- owned- Open lands are
generally discussed in the context of how they could
be used by the Town to address the need for public
measures -
This chapter summarizes community input
on environmentally sensitive lands and
provides an explanation of the type of lands
that are considered environmentally sensitive -
Explanation of how potentially environmentally
sensitive, privatelyownedlands were evaluated
and recommendations for lands to be acquired
by the Town are provided -Finally, techniques
to be used for the protection of these lands are
addressed -
COMMUNITY INPUT
There was very broad support among those
who participated in scoping sessions and
community meetings for the Town to continue
efforts to acquire and protect environmentally
sensitive lands- Most felt that the '94 Plan and
the Town's previous efforts to acquire lands for
open space (and for park and trail development)
have been very beneficial- Reasons for
continuing these efforts varied- For many, the
need to protect our environmentally sensitive
6 1 Chapter 2 - Environmentally Sensitive Lands
lands and wildlife resources were the most
compelling reasons for the Town to acquire
lands. For others, the benefit of acquiring lands
was to prevent them from being developed.
Acquiring lands to create buffers between
neighborhoods and to establish open space
that would offset the impacts from the ongoing
redevelopment of Vail was also mentioned.
There was a noticeable emphasis in public input
regarding the water quality of Gore Creek and
the potential benefits of land acquisitions that
could contribute to improving the health of this
creek and its tributaries.
The Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) has been
the Town's primary funding source for the
purchase of lands for open space or recreational
purposes. There were many comments
regarding RETT, ranging from a suggestion
to expire the tax due to the lack of lands
available for purchase, to refocusing the use of
RETT funds on land purchases as opposed to
maintenance and other purposes. There were a
number of comments that land purchased with
RETT funds should only be used for open space
or park purposes. A summary of how the RETT
ordinance has been amended over the years is
found in the appendix.
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE
LANDS
In the '94 Plan, the primary reason for the
Town to acquire open lands was to protect
environmentally sensitive land resources. The
protection of the Gore Creek corridor and its
importance as a wildlife, riparian and wetland
resource and recreation amenity was also
mentioned, as were open space acquisitions that
would preserve the "mountain experience and the
natural character of the Vail Valley
While these reasons provided some guidance in
identifying potential parcels for acquisition, they
are broadly stated and do not provide specifics
with regards to what is meant by environmentally
environmentally sensitive lands:
Wetland / Riparian area along Gore Creek.
Wetland and Riparian Areas
Wetlands and riparian areas provide flood control,
filtration of storm water run-off and important
habitat for a myriad of wildlife and plant species.
These areas are particularly important to Gore
Creek for two reasons. Gore Creek has been listed
as Impaired by the Colorado Department of Public
Health and Environment due to lack of aquatic life
and the lower stretch of the creek is designated
Gold Medal Water by Colorado Parks and Wildlife.
The Town has responded to this situation a
number of ways, most notably by the adoption of
Restore the Gore, a Gore Creek Strategic Plan for
improving the health of this water course. The
acquisition and protection of parcels along Gore
Creek and its tributaries that could help improve
water quality and benefit the aquatic health of
this water course should be considered.
Wildlife Corridors and Habitat
The abundance and variety of wildlife that
can be seen in and around Vail are resources
valued by both residents and guests. Population
declines of key species such as elk, mule deer
and bighorn sheep over the past two decades
have been attributed to habitat fragmentation
Wd increased trail and recreational use.
Acquisition of parcels which could establish
habitat connectivity, potential wildlife corridors
and areas known to contain seasonal habitat for
species should be considered.
Native Plant Habitat
Lands that support sensitive or native plant
species and other notable vegetation cover that
contributes to the Town's scenic and natural
qualities.
Geologically Sensitive Lands
Lands that include geologically sensitive areas
such as avalanche, debris flow, rockfall, steep
slope and floodplain hazards.
The considerations above have been used to
identify lands that if acquired and protected
would further the goals of this Plan.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 7 1 Chapter 2 - Environmentally Sensitive Lands
EVALUATION OF UNDEVELOPED
PRIVATELY -OWNED LANDS
The major focus of the '94 Plan was to identify
environmentally sensitive lands and to outline
strategies for the Town to acquire and protect
them. A comprehensive evaluation of all
undeveloped lands not owned by the Town
was completed. The purpose of this evaluation
was to identify specific parcels that if acquired or
protected could further the goal of protecting
sensitive environmental resources. This
evaluation resulted in thirty parcels that were
recommended for acquisition and protection.
Properties identified on the Privately Owned Lands/ protection of the land, and recommendations
Parcels for Acquisition and/or Protection Plan include for acquisition of the land or other protection
parcels that: strategies.
• Are located adjacent to Gore Creek or one of its
tributaries,
• Benefit wildlife habitat by providing movement
corridors or other benefits,
• Are inaccessible due to terrain or ownership o
where access would have negative impact
the land,
• Include steep slopes or other environmental
hazards.
such as the Eagle River Water and Sanitation
District and the Colorado Department of
Transportation.
Each of the sixteen parcels identified for acquisition
or protection are more specifically discussed in
Chapter 5 - Action Plan. Information provided
in Chapter 5 includes the parcel size, zoning
and ownership, the benefits for acquisition and
Rockfall and steep slope hazards in the Lionsridge
neighborhood.
PROTECTION OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE
LANDS
The '94 Plan addressed the importance of the
Town protecting environmentally sensitive lands
from future development or changes of use.
This was prompted in part by community input
during the development of the '94 Plan:
"one of the concerns frequently expressed at the
public meetings was the need to ensure that once
lands are acquired for open space, parks and trails
that they be protected from conversion to other uses
in the future"
From 1994 Open Lands Plan
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 8 1 Chapter 2 - Environmentally Sensitive Lands
Acquisition of parcels would involve the Town
As a part of this update process, an evaluation
approaching the land jwner to gauge their
similar to that done in 1994 was completed for
interest in selling their land to the Town. Subject
all privately owned, undeveloped lands within
to agreeing on terms, the Town would acquire the
the Town. The purpose of this evaluation was
land and then take steps to ensure it is protected
twofold - to identify any lands that may have
from development. In lieu of outright acquisition, the
been overlooked by the '94 Plan and to see if
protection of lands could also be achieved by the
changed conditions warrant the inclusion of
Town working with land owners to protect the land
lands that were not addressed by the '94 Plan.
from development. This could be accomplished by
One hundred and six parcels were evaluated
plug a conservation easement on the land that
relative to the considerations described abo
would restrict or limit its development. In certain
cases, the conservation easement could involve
The Privately Owned Lands/Parcels for
compensation to the land owner for development
Acquisition and/or Protection Plan on the
rights that would be relinquished by the
following page depicts all undeveloped,
conservation easement. Another alternative could
privately owned parcels within the Town of
be to work with land owners to rezone property
Vail and the sixteen parcels recommended for
to limit its development potential or to define no -
acquisition or protection (note that privately
build areas that would prevent development of
owned also includes land owned by agencies
environmentally sensitive portions of a parcel.
such as the Eagle River Water and Sanitation
District and the Colorado Department of
Transportation.
Each of the sixteen parcels identified for acquisition
or protection are more specifically discussed in
Chapter 5 - Action Plan. Information provided
in Chapter 5 includes the parcel size, zoning
and ownership, the benefits for acquisition and
Rockfall and steep slope hazards in the Lionsridge
neighborhood.
PROTECTION OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE
LANDS
The '94 Plan addressed the importance of the
Town protecting environmentally sensitive lands
from future development or changes of use.
This was prompted in part by community input
during the development of the '94 Plan:
"one of the concerns frequently expressed at the
public meetings was the need to ensure that once
lands are acquired for open space, parks and trails
that they be protected from conversion to other uses
in the future"
From 1994 Open Lands Plan
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 8 1 Chapter 2 - Environmentally Sensitive Lands
�I�ir'V ::ilF
0 - Private Undeveloped Parcels
0 - Environmentally Sensitive Private Undeveloped Parcels Identified
for Aquisition and/or protection (16)
PRIVATELY -OWNED LANDS/PARCELS FOR
ACQUISITION AND/OR PROTECTION PLAN
cRnn�xmcni�
2018 Open Lands Plan - Update 1 9 Chapter 2 - Environmentally Sensitive Lands
In response, the '94 Plan suggested two
approaches for protecting lands — the use
of conservation easements or a referendum
process that would require voter approval to
change the zoning and use of Town -owned
lands.
Conservation Easements
Conservation easements permanently protect
the conservation values of land by limiting the
use or development of the land_ Establishing
a conservation easement is the decision of the
land owner and involves working in partnership
with an independent land trust, such as the
Eagle Valley Land Trust, which would hold the
easement The easement is legally enforceable
and is recorded with the property deed_ Subject
to the goals of the land owner and negotiations
with the land trust, an easement may allow for
limited uses (such as trails or utilities) that do not
compromise the conservation values of the land
Referendum/Voter Approval While the process to change a parcel that
A common approach for communities to protect has been dedicated Designated Open
publiclyownedlands from future development Space may be challenging, are there lands
or changes of use is to zone the property so that owned by the Town that warrant further
development potential is very limited and then protection via a conservation easement?
require a vote of the public to change such zoning.
Voter approval to change zoning eliminates
concerns with future councils changing the decisions
of previous councils. This approach is considered to
be an effective means for protecting lands bu is less
permanent than a conservation easeme
4
While a handful of conservation easements are h
place on Town -owned lands, the Town Council
amended the Town Charter in 1995 to establish
Designated Open Space. Designated Open Space
is an overlay designation that can be applied by
the Town Council to any Town -owned parcel that
satisfies certain criteria. The open space designation
cannot be changed, nor can a parcel that has been
dedicated Designated Open Space be sold, without
and may also specify management practices for a three-fourths vote of the Town Council and
the land_ Once an easement is in place the lander then a vote of the public Specific procedures for
owner retains ownership of the land while th Designated Open Space as prescribed by the Town
land trust is responsible for monitoring th Charter are found in the appendix of this Plan.
to ensure its use is consistent with the terms
of the easement. Conservation easements are Community Input on the Protection of Lands
considered to be unchangeable and establish The protection of Town -owned lands was discussed
permanent protection of the land's conservation , throughout this update process. This discussion
values_ focused on the need for lands to be protected and
more specifically the methods used for protection.
The role conservation easements can play in the
Town's goals for protection of environmentally
sensitive lands is discussed in Chapter 6
Implementation_
Two common themes, or questions, were
heard:
Are there additional environmentally sensitive
lands owned by the Town that warrant being
dedicated Designated Open Space?
In response to these questions, an evaluation
of Town -owned lands that could qualify to be
Designated Open Space and Town -owned
lands that could be considered for conservation
easement protection was completed.
DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE LANDS
Oce 1995, the Town has applied the
Designated Open Space overlay to fifty-seven
Town -owned parcels that comprise 533 acres.
The process for applying this designation
involves a recommendation from the Open
Space Board of Trustees (comprised of the
Town manager, one member from the Town
Council and one member from the Planning
and Environmental Commission) that is
presented to the Town Council. The Open
Space Board of Trustees recommendation must
be unanimous. A three-fourths vote of the
entire Town Council is then required to apply
the open space designation on a parcel of land.
To be considered for dedication as Designation
Open Space, a parcel must be owned by the
Town of Vail and zoned either Natural Area
Preservation, Outdoor Recreation or Agricultural
Open Space. In addition, the parcel must be
either:
Environmentally sensitive lands (wetlands,
riparian areas, critical habitat identified by
Colorado Parks and Wildlife, or the Natural
Heritage Program),
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 10 1 Chapter 2 - Environmentally Sensitive Lands
2. High natural hazard areas including the
100 year flood plain, red avalanche hazard
area, high rock fall hazard area, and high
debris flow hazard area, or
3. Town of Vail parks that provide passive
outdoor recreation opportunities.
A map depicting the Town's Open Space
Zoned Lands, Designated Open Space, and
Conservation Easements is found on the
following page. This Plan depicts:
• Town -owned parcels that are Designated
Open Space,
• Town -owned parcels that are zoned Natural
Area Preservation, Outdoor Recreation or
Agricultural Open Space but do not meet
one of the three criteria listed above,
• Town -owned parcels that are zoned Natural
Area Preservation, Outdoor Recreation or
Agricultural Open Space that do meet one
of the other three criteria, and
• Town -owned lands with a conservation
such, dedicating a parcel Designated Open Space
should only be done after thorough consideration
of all relevant factors. The Town must be certain of
their commitment and understand that any future
or unforeseen land needs that may arise could only
be developed on designated parcels if such uses
conformed to the limited range of uses permitted by
these three open space zone districts.
In depth study of these twenty-six parcels is necessary
in order to determine which, if any warrant being
dedicated as Designated Open Space_ Factors
to be studied include site characteristics, zoning
and potential opportunities for future Town use.
This effort should be initiated by Town Staff and
supported by a citizen's task force to ensure there is
broad community involvement in this procPv
As a part of the staff and task force efforts described
above, all Town -owned lands should be evaluated
to identify any parcels that are currently not zoned
Natural Area Preservation, Outdoor Recreation or
Agricultural Open Space, but may otherwise be
easement appropriate for Designated Open Space. In such
cases, consideration could be given to re -zoning
A total of twenty-six Town -owned parcels are such lands to one of the three open space districts
appropriately zoned and satisfy one or more kso that they would be eligible to be Designated
of the criteria pertaining to environmental Open Space. The Designated Open Space process
sensitivity, natural hazards or passive recreation,
but are not Designated Open Space. Each of
these parcels could potentially be Designated
Open Space.
While Designated Open Space parcels can
be changed, once a parcel is dedicated as
Designated Open Space it is arguably locked
up as park or open space land, due to the steps
necessary to change such designation. As
as outlined in the Town Charter should also be
evaluated to determine if changes could be made
to increase the flexibility of how Designated Open
Space can be established. Such decisions would
ultimately be made by the Town Council after
recommendation from the staff and task force.
Refer to Chapter 6 — Implementation for more
information.
hp
dirk -
Mw= "W- -
2018 Open Lands Plan Update I 11 I A conservation easement has been established on the
Town's waterfall parcel in East Vail.
West Vail
Interchange
Intermountain
Potato Patch
OPEN SPACE ZONED LANDS
DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AND
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS
2018 Open Lands Plan - Update
mllw" 20111f
.. Park
Main Vail '
Interchange'
Booth Falls
East Vail
Interchange
Legend
- Zoned OR, NAP or AOS, not currently eligible
- Zoned OR, NAP or AOS, eligible for Designated Open Space Overlay
- Zoned OR, NAP or AOS and has Designated Open Space Overlay
- Conservation Easement
IhC7H7k1
Chapter 2 - Environmentally Sensitive Lands
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS
The Town's Designated Open Space process
provides very strong assurances that designated
lands will be protected by limiting uses and
preventing the sale of such lands. It is very
difficult to change Designated Open Space
once it has been established. That said,
community input has suggested the use of
conservation easements to provide stronger
protection of the Town's open spaces.
Conservation easements are held in perpetuity
by a land trust which in essence means the land
is protected forever. Conservation easements
are widely considered the most effective means
of protecting lands from development or
changes in use that could otherwise affect the
conservation values of the land.
perpetuity, the task force efforts described above
should also include the evaluation of Town -owned
lands that may warrant protection by a conservatio
easement. Establishing an additional layer of
protection afforded by a conservation easement
may be beneficial on lands that could otherwise
have some level of development potential or wher(
unique site characteristics may warrant additional
protection. The key questions when considering
the implementation of a conservation easement is
whether the value of the land as open space is sud
that it should always and forever be protected and
maintained as open space and whether the Town
is prepared to relenquish control of the land to a
third parry. By placing a conservation easement or
Town -owned land, the=own would be making a
statement about its commitment to the environment
and leaving a legacy of conservation for future
generations.
The benefit of applying a conservation
easement to Town -owned land is that the The n Council has the ority to establish
land would be protected in perpetuity, and in ea sem on Town -own ands and this authority
doing so would provide lasting protection of des conservation easements. If the Town
environmentally sensitive lands or lands wit Co I initiates a s4aff/task force effort to study
other characteristics that are valued by th conservation easements, it is anticipated that this will
community for preservation. The potential involve a comprehensive evalution of the pros and
detriment of applying a conservation easement cons of conservation easements, identification of
to Town -owned land is that the Town would parcels that may be appropriate for protection by a
be committing to limitations on the use of such
lands and giving up the control of the land
to the land trust. A conservation easement
would limit land uses and in doing so limit the
Town's flexibility in using land to meet future,
unforeseen land needs.
,4Vnservation easement and recommendations on a
formal process for establishing such easements.
Town Parcels to Consider for Conservation
Easement
The four areas of Town described below are
dedicated as Designated Open Space and each
In response to community sentiment and the provides open space that is highly valued by the
value held by many for the importance of the community for the scenic qualities, neighborhood
Town to protect key open space parcels in buffers or sensitive lands they contain. These parcels
are suggested for further evaluation to understand
should also consider other Town -owned parcels
that may warrant protection by a conservation
easement.
Gore Creek Corridor
The Town owns the majority of the Gore Creek
corridor between Ford Park and Donovan
Park. These parcels total approximately 37 acres
and approximately half of these parcels are
Designated Open Space. These parcels include
Gore Creek and associated floodplain, wetlands
and riparian areas. With the exception of
trails or passive recreation improvements such
as benches, these parcels are not buildable.
Establishing a conservation easement on these
lands would be a strong statement as to the
importance of Gore Creeks aquatic health.
Any conservation easement would need to
acknowledge the limited existing (and future)
improvements such as trails, bridges, utilities and
drainage improvements, etc.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 13 1 Chapter 2 - Environmentally Sensitive Lands
Katsos Ranch
The 144 acre Katsos Ranch is arguably Vail's
most renowned open space parcel. The land
includes wetlands, Gore Creek and associated
floodplain and riparian habitat, high and
moderate severity debris flow, high severity rock
fall and avalanche hazards. The site provides
an important buffer between East Vail and the
Aspen Lane neighborhood and coupled with
its scenic qualities and environmentally sensitive
features, this parcel warrants consideration for,
a conservation easement. If a conservation
Booth Falls Parcels
easement is pursued, reserved rights for trails
Two parcels located around the Booth Falls
and the Memorial Garden should be retained,neighborhood
are both zoned Natural Area
Preservation. The easterly parcel is 30.2 acres and is
impacted by steep slopes and high severity rockfall
hazard. The westerly parcel is 93 acres and is
impacted by debris flow hazards. Both parcels are
considered critical bighorn sheep range/habitat-
The bighorn sheep habitat on these parcels make
them unique and this warrants consideration of a
conservation easement. If a conservation easement
is pursued, reserved rights for trails and maintenance
of rockfall mitigation should be established.
rer Bench of Donovan Park
he+/ -35 acre Upper Bench parcel is zoned
Outdoor Recreation and was purchased with
RETT funds. The parcel is impacted by high
hazard debris flow and steep slopes. The
parcel provides an open space buffer within
the Matterhorn neighborhood. The property
has good access and subject to mitigation of
hazards, could have development potential and
for this reason this parcel warrants consideration
of a conservation easement. If a conservation
easement is pursued, reserved rights for trails,
passive recreation use and temporary uses such
as staging areas for timber removal.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 14 1 Chapter 2 - Environmentally Sensitive Lands
r 4--
CHAPTER 3 -
TOWN -OWNED LANDS AND USE OF LANDS
One of the five objectives of the '94 Plan was to-
The '94 Plan also provided recommendations
for the use of eight Town -owned parcels -
"Identify a comprehensive system of open space uses
Three of these recommendations involved
such as parks, recreation, protection of environmental
the development Of affordable Or employee
resources, trails and to reserve lands for public use"
housing On the Vail Commons parcel, On
four lots located on Garmish Drive and
One of the stated purposes of the '94 Plan was to
on the Mountain Bell site- Each of these
"create a small amount of contingency land for
recommendations has been implemented -
unforeseen needs (e -g- employee housing, public While the Berry Creek parcel located in Edwards
facilities)" and an objective of the Plan was to
w ultimately sold to Eagle County, the
)an's
"identify, to the extent possible, future public needs
recommendations for recreational and
(or needs not currently being met) that will require
housing development on this parcel have been
land"- The Action Plan included recommendations
implemented by others -
for the use or acquisition of "parcels intended for
other community needs such as an additional fire
The purpose of this chapter is to understand
station"- _
the Town's land resources and how they can
■
The '94 Plan identified five Town of Vail issues and
needs for community oriented projects that would
require land-
] -
and -1- Expansiorrthe Public Works facility
Z- New West Vail Fire Station
3- Vail Police Department firing range
4- Expanded play areas at Red Sandstone
Elementary School
5- Employee housing projects at Vail Commons
and the Mountain Bell site
address the Town's future land needs- Below
is a summary of community input on the use of
Town -owned lands and the need for new or
expanded community facilities- An evaluation of
whether Town -owned lands can accommodate
future community oriented uses, input from
Town staff on the need for new or expanded
community facilities and an evaluation of
all vacant, privatelyownedland that could
potentially address future public needs is also
provided -
With the exception of the Police Department firing
{ range, each of the projects listed above have been
implemented- The Public Works expansion and the
Chamonix housing project are located on land that
was identified for acquisition by the '94 Action Plan-
,.
15 I Chapter 3 - Town Owned Lands and Use of Lands
COMMUNITY INPUT ON THE USE
OF TOWN LANDS
A variety of opinions were expressed by the
community regarding Town facilities, the
need for expanded or new facilities, the use
of Town -owned lands and if or under what
circumstances the Town should acquire land for
public facilities and community oriented uses.
As a relatively mature community, Vail
operates a wide variety of public facilities and
there was a general level of satisfaction with
facilities provided by the Town and how they
are managed. By way of example, during
the preparation of the '94 Plan there was
considerable community support for the
development of additional neighborhood parks
and the '94 Plan identified a number of park
improvements. Likely due to the development
of Donovan Park, Sunbird Park, Booth Creek
Park, Ellefson Park and major improvements to
other Town parks since 1994, there were no
comments or requests to expand the Town's
developed or are zoned for development should be
considered for acquisition and use by the Town.
There were also divergent opinions on what
constitutes a public facility or a community oriented
use. Many felt that affordable housing is neither a
public facility nor a community oriented use. Further,
there were suggestions that the Town should not be
in the housing business and that housing should not
be addressed by the Open Lands Plan. By the same
token, many others felt that affordable housing is a
Meadows subdivision, all lands immediately
surrounding the Town's boundary are owned
by the United States Forest Service. A plan
depicting Town -owned lands is found on the
following page.
The Town of Vail has three open space -oriented
zone districts — the Agricultural and Open Space
District, the Outdoor Recreation District and the
Natural Area Preservation District. While the
purpose of the Agricultural and Open Space
valid community oriented use, that projects like the District and Outdoor Recreation District is to
Chamonix development are beneficial and that it is preserve open space lands, these districts allow
appropriate for this Plan to identify lands that may be for a limited range of land uses. The Natural
suitable for housing development. There was much * Area Preservation District is intended to protect
agreement amongst tose in supportTown-
initiated housing projects that any Town project
should be on land that is zoned for development,
is located within an established neighborhood and
is proximate to public transit. A number of people
expressed a preference for re -developing properties
that are currently developed.
While a wide spectrum of comments were heard,
park facilities during this update process. written comments provided by the community were
near evenly split as to whether the Open Lands Plan
The circumstances under which the Town h Id dd h h 380/ f
s a r
ou ess ousing wit o o comments in
should pursue the acquisition of land for
public facilities or community oriented uses
prompted many diverse opinions. There
were a preponderance of opinions that land
acquisitions should first and foremost be
to acquire land for open space to protect
environmentally sensitive lands. Further,
that any parcel acquired for community uses
should only occur if that parcel does not have
environmental values that should be protected
For some, only lands that are currently
support and 41% opposed.
OVERVIEW OF TOWN -OWNED LANDS
There are approximately 2,904 acres of land located
within the Town's boundary and the Town of Vail
owns 161 parcels that total 1,040 acres, or 35.8% of
all land within the Town. Rights-of-way for Interstate
70 and the Frontage Roads comprise approximately
495 acres and approximately 1,262 acres of land are
privatelyownedor owned by other governmental
entities. With the exception of the Highland
sensitive lands from development and land
uses in this district are very limited. 758 acres,
or 728% of all Town -owned lands are zoned
one of these three open space districts. The 57
Town -owned parcels that are Designated Open
Space total 533 acres.
Ford Park sports fields.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 16 1 Chapter 3 - Town Owned Lands and Use of Lands
Town -Owned Lands - 1,040 acres
1-70 Corridor - 495 acres
Privately Owned Lands - 1,262 acres
TOWN OF VAIL OWNED LANDS
AND 1-70 R.O.W. LANDS
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 17 1 Chapter 3 - Town Owned Lands and Use of Lands
LAND NEEDS FOR PUBLIC USES
AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES
While there were suggestions from the
community for expanding the supply of public
parking, the development of more affordable
housing, the development of conference
performing art and recreation centers and a
disc golf course, there was no single use that
generated a significant number of requests
from the community.
Town department directors were consulted for
their input on the need for new or additional
facilities. The Fire Department is interested in a
one -acre site for a training facility. The Human
Resources Department supported affordable
housing to assist in recruitment and retention
of employees. The Public Works Department
would like to expand the existing snow dump,
establish a solar farm and increase public
parking, and the Economic Development
Department supports the development of
conference facilities, a theater and other event
areas.
the cost to construct parking are the two primary
challenges to developing additional parking.
EVALUATION OF TOWN -OWNED
LANDS
All 161 Town -owned parcels were evaluated to
determine if any of these parcels can accommodate
the Town's future needs for public or community -
oriented facilities. A fundamental assumption in this
evaluation was that existing uses will be maintained
and no existing uses would be displaced in order toy
accommodate other uses.
The initial step in this evaluation considered the
existing use and site characteristics of all Town -
owned lands. Lands that are currently used for other
purposes and lands with site characteristics tlat
would preclude their development were eliminated
from consideration. Lands were categorized one
of four ways - d0veloped lands such as the Vail
Municipal Building, park and recreational lands such
as Ford Park and the Vail Golf Club, environmentally
constrained lands, and Designated Open Space
parcels and conservation easement lands.
The feasibility of conference, performing art `After eliminating parcels from the four categories
and recreation centers has been discussed and listed above, only eight Town -owned parcels
studied over the past few decades. Original remained. These eight parcels were evaluated based
plans for Ford Park included an aquatics/ on size, terrain and site characteristics, site context
recreation center and on more than one and relationship with surrounding lands, access and
occasion a convention center has been covenants restrictions. These eight parcels include:
proposed, most recently at the east end of
the Lionshead Parking Structure. For various
reasons none of these facilities have been
constructed. The development of additional
public parking has been a priority of the Town
for many years. A lack of available land and
Parcel #1 - Commonly referred to as the Middle
Bench of Donovan Park, this 2.1 acre parcel is zoned
Agricultural and Open Space and is located on
Matterhorn Circle in the Matterhorn neighborhood.
Based on site characteristics such as terrain and
access, this parcel is considered buildable.
However, this parcel was purchased with RETT
funds and as such land uses are limited to parks,
recreation, open space and similar purposes.
The Town Council has by resolution designated
this parcel as a "park
Parcel #2 — This 3.1 acre parcel located in
the Glen Lyon neighborhood is zoned Special
Development District. While the parcel is
buildable based on site characteristics, use of the
parcel is restricted by protective covenants.
cel #3 — This 1 acre parcel is located at
rt
the north portal of the 1-70 pedestrian bridge.
Use of the parcel is restricted by protective
covenants
Parcel #4 — This .3 acre parcel is zoned
Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and currently provides
a pedestrian connection between Lionshead
Place and the Gore Creek bike path. Use of the
parcel is also restricted by protective covenants.
Parcel #5 — This .3 acre parcel located along
East Lionshead Circle is zoned General Use.
The size of this parcel limits its development
potential.
Parcel #G — This .5 acre parcel located on
Beaver Dam Road is zoned Natural Area
Preservation. The presence of wetlands would
render this site to be unbuildable.
Parcel #7 — This 13 acre parcel is located along
Bald Mountain Road. It is zoned Outdoor
Recreation and the use of the parcel is restricted
by protective covenants.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 18 1 Chapter 3 - Town Owned Lands and Use of Lands
Potato Patch #5 ('
#3
U
#4
#G
Main Vail '
Interchange'
West Vail
Interchange #2
U #1
N #7 Booth Falls
Intermountain
' Ford Park
EVALUATION OF TOWN -
OWNED LANDS
2018 Open Lands Plan - Update
Legend
- Town -Owned
- Town -Owned Potential Use Parcels (8)
19
East Vail
Interchange
H
NOWnI
Chapter 3 - Town Owned Lands and Use of Lands
Parcel #8 — This .3 acre parcel is located
between the 1-70 corridor and Booth
Creek Road. The size of this parcel limits its
development potential.
Due to parcel size, access constraints, and
restrictions due to covenants or land being
purchased with RETT funds, none of these eight
parcels are currently viable for the development
of public uses or community oriented facilities.
While the Town does not currently own vacant
land capable of accommodating new uses,
some Town -owned parcels that are currently
developed may be capable of accommodating
new or expanded uses. An example of this
is the shared parking structure with Eagle
County Schools, planned for Red Sandstone
Elementary. Other examples could include the
Public Works Facility, the Vail Municipal Building
and the east end of the Lionshead Parking
Structure. The Town owns additional lands
adjacent to the Public Works facility that could
accommodate expansion of the existing snow
dump. While the east end of the Lionshe
Parking Structure has been studied for the
development of conference facility, a proposed
Development at the East end of Lionshead Parking
Structure has been studied in the past.
conference facility at this location was rejected by
Vail voters. The redevelopment of the Municipal
Building has been studied for concepts that included
additional community uses. Each of these possibilities
would require additional study to fully understand the
feasibility of accommodating other uses.
EVALUATION OF PRIVATELY -OWNED
LANDS
The '94 Plan recommended a number of vacant,
privately owned parcels to be acquired for the future
development of public facilities and community -
oriented uses. Examples of these are land acquired
from Vail Resorts for expansion of the Public Works
facility and land in West Vail that now includes the
Chamonix housing project. Currently there are
approximately 106 privately owned, undeveloped
parcels in the Town of Vail. Each of these parcels
was evaluated to understand if any could potentially
accommodate blic facilities and community oriented
uses.
Evaluation of these lands considered parcel size,
existing zoning, site characteristics, the context of
the site, covenant restrictions and its relationship to
surrounding uses. The majority of these 106 parcels
were deemed to not be viable for Town use for these
reasons:
• Over half of the 106 parcels evaluated were
Isolated, low density zoned parcels in established
neighborhoods. These were considered to most
appropriately be developed in accordance with
existing zoning,
• Environmentally sensitive parcels were not
considered viable development sites (these parcels
are addressed in Chapter 2 — Environmentally
Sensitive Lands,
• Parcel size, site context and covenant
restrictions limited the viability of many
sites.
Remaining parcels were then considered
relative to their ability to potentially
accommodate the broad list of public facilities
and community oriented uses suggested
by the community and Town staff Due to
parcel locations, site context and the land
area requirements, none of the remaining
parcels are feasible for the development
of parking, conference, performing arts
or recreation. There are three sites that
could potentially accommodate affordable
housing and one site that could accomodate
expansion to a town park.
West Vail Parcels along Chamonix Lane.
West Vail Parcels along Chamonix Lane
If assembled, these three contiguous parcels
could accommodate a small housing
development. These parcels are zoned Two -
Family Primary/Secondary Residential and
located next to multi -family and commercial
development. While the parcels total 159
acres, development potential will be limited
as over half the land area exceeds 40% slope.
Refer to Action Item #4 in Chapter 5-
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 20 1 Chapter 3 - Town Owned Lands and Use of Lands
Old Roost Lodge
This 1.9 acre site previously accommodated
the Roost Lodge. The site is now vacant and
development approvals have been granted for
a hotel/affordable housing development. If the
approved development does not proceed, the
site could be viable for the development of an
affordable housing project or other community
use. Refer to Action Item #7 in Chapter 5.
CDOT/Bighorn Parcel
This 1.8 acre site is owned by CDOT. The
primary purpose of this acquisition is to protect
the Bighorn Creek corridor. Limited residential
development may also be feasible. If
development is pursued, ample setbacks from
the creek should be provided and the mature
spruce trees should be maintained. Refer to
Action Item #23 in Chapter 5.
Below are management actions for open
lands to be addressed by the Town. A
number of these steps involve follow-up
actions or the preparation of plans that will
be completed after the adoption of this Plan.
Some of these tasks are further discussed in
Chapter 6 — Implementation.
Periodic Maintenance of Open Lands
All open lands will need periodic inspection
Talisa Tennis Courts and routine maintenance. Maintenance
r
Tennis courts for the Talisa Hotel are to aced on t
� actions may include, but not be limited to,
acre site. The site is located immediately adjacent t vegetation management and weed control,
Donovan Park. If in the future the hotel is interested eaning of litter or debris, resolving any
disposal of this land, the Town could consider erosion or drainage issues and repair or
acquisition for the expansion of Donovan Park. Refer replace any improvements such as signs or
to Action Item #9 in Cha er 5.
MANAGEMENT OF VAIL'S OPEN
LANDS
The '94 Plan in ded two approaches for the
management of open lands. The first was to establish
a cooperative management system with both the
USFS and Vail Resorts. The second was to develop
a management system to provide appropriate
stewardship and maintenance for the Town's
open lands. These concepts remain valid today.
Community input during this update process echoed
these concepts. Suggestions involved managing
lands to promote biodiversity, attending to routine
maintenance such as weed control and managing
erosion or other issues and maintaining trails to
ensure they remain sustainable.
seating. Town staff should establish seasonal
inspections of all open lands to identify any
maintenance needs. Appropriate staff and
budget should be established to implement
this management program.
Wildfire and Safetv Considerations
The Vail Fire & Emergency Services is involved
in ongoing efforts to manage vegetation to
minimize the potential threat of wildfire in and
around Vail. Wildfires do not recognize Town
or property boundaries and the Department's
mitigation efforts are not limited to Town -
owned lands. That said, any decisions
regarding management of the Town's
open lands should be coordinated with the
Department's wildfire mitigation efforts.
Any new recreation trails, whether located
on Town land or on USFS lands, should
also involve coordination with Vail Fire and
Emergency Services. Considerations to be
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 21 1 Chapter 3 - Town Owned Lands and Use of Lands
addressed include emergency provider
access to trails and mitigation of hazards
that may be presented by standing -dead
lodgepole located proximate to any new
trails.
Managing Lands for Biodiversity
Biodiversity refers to the diversity of plants,
animals and micro-organisms within an
ecosystem. Biodiversity is essential to how
an ecosystem functions with respect
to cycling of nutrients and water, soil
formation and retention, resistance to
invasive species and the pollination of
plants. Biodiversity will enhance the health
and abundance of both plant and animal
life -
"Biodiversity
ife.
"Biodiversity as a whole forms a shield
protecting each of the species that together
compose it, ourselves included." — E.O.
Wilson
The protection and preservation of the
natural environment and wildlife resource
of Vail's open lands is a high priority
of the community. The recreational
use of the Town's open space is also
an important priority. How lands are
managed and the level of human activity
can impact biodiversity. Decisions on
the management and use of the Town's
open space should be made to balance
these two priorities so that the impacts
from human activity on sensitive habitats
(habitats used by rare or endangerd
species, or habitats that have special needs
such as critical winter range, summer
range, breeding, spawning or nesting areas and
migration corridors) are limited or appropriately
mitigated.
Recommendations for the implementation of a
comprehensive biodiversity program is discussed in
Chapter 6 Implementation.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 22 1 Chapter 3 - Town Owned Lands and Use of Lands
CHAPTER 4 -TRAILS
Improving the trail and bike path system in and around Vail was listed as one of
the top three priorities of the '94 Plan for open space and recreation needs and
four of the five top "priorities for action" involved improvements to the Town's
recreational trails and paths. These four improvements from the '94 Plan included:
• Extend the Vail Trail to East Vail and add several trailheads to access the trail,
• Add a new trail on the north side and western half of Town to connect
existing trailheads and neighborhoods,
• Add three trailheads in the core area to access Vail Mountain trails and inform
visitors of trail opportunities and provide better access to Gore Creek,
• Add bike lanes to the north and south frontage roads (the entire length of
Town) and add paved shoulders to Vail Valley Drive.
Of these five priority improvements, the North Trail has been constructed and
bike lanes along the North and South Frontage Roads have been completed.
The
'94 Plan included a total of twenty-four other trail system improvements. Many
of these improvements have been addressed, most notable among them are
wayfinding and trailhead signage and new or improved trailheads at the Buffehr
Creek, Davos, Middle Creek and Booth Falls trails.
In addition I specific trail system improvements, the '94 Plan included a Concept
Plan. The Concept Plan provided a framework for specific actions that were
recommended by the '94 Plan, one of which was the idea of a soft surface trail
pptem that looped the perimeter of Town to provide connections between all of
Vail's neighborhoods. This concept was compared to similar trail systems in the
Alps where interconnected trails allow hikers to access surrounding villages. This
Concept Plan from the '94 Plan is found on the following page.
Trails were a significant element of the '94 Plan. In some cases, however, the '94
Plan lacked detail on future trail development with respect to the purpose for
new trails, design standards or user groups to be served by the trails. One of the
objectives of this update is to provide more clarity with respect to Vail's vision for
recreation trails.
This chapter includes a summary of community input and a broad vision
statement for Vail's trail system. Existing trails, including unofficial or social trails
were inventoried, trail use on key trails was measured and an overall assessment
of Vail's existing trail system has been completed. A conceptual trails plan
provides ideas for new trails that could be developed in the future and a process
for evaluating and making decision on new trail development is also provided.
Chapter 4 - Trails
Town of Vail
Natiw Forest System Booth Cmek Trail
Com7whemsrr Op, :ands Pian
s
Concept Plan from '94 Plan
�Irfil
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 24 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
COMMUNITY INPUT ON TRAILS
Recreational trails were a focal point of
discussion at community meetings held during
this update process. Input was obtained during
scoping sessions, community meetings, small
group trail meetings and a Town wide trails
workshop.
Scoping Sessions and Community
Meetings
Wide spread support and appreciation for
Vail's trail system and for surrounding regional
trails was expressed by the community. When
asked "do you see trails providing a benefit to
the community" during the Scoping Sessions,
the overwhelming majority of respondents
answered "yes"_ Trails are viewed as an
important resource for living a healthy and
active lifestyle, for providing alternative modes
of transportation and for contributing to Vail's
tourism -based economy. The need for trail
maintenance, improved signage, expanded
parking at trailheads and trail management
to address user conflicts were also cited. A
summary of community input on trails is found
in the appendix.
The community was divided on the need for
expansion of the existing trail system. While
many thought Vail's system of trails was
sufficient and the expansion of trails was not
necessary, many others saw potential benefits
from the development of new trails. In written
community feedback obtained during the
Scoping Sessions, when asked "what steps
could be taken to improve the Town's existing
trail system" a majority of those who responded
were in support of more trails. When asked
about the Concept Plan idea of a trail system
linking Vail neighborhoods from the '94 Plan, a
clear majority of those who responded thought this
was a good idea_ Notwithstanding the input above,
there was a clear consensus that if any new trails are
developed, that they be designed and constructed
in a sensitive and sustainable manner and that any
new trails not result in significant impacts on the
natural environment or wildlife resources. Impacts
on wildlife that may result from the use of trails was
clearly a community concern and in response a
Wildlife Forum was held during the preparation of
this Plan. The forum included four wildlife biologists
and discussion focused on the state of wildlife
resources in the Gore Creek Valley and how huma
activity affects wildlife_ Information from the wildlife
forum and the importance of wildlife considerations
being an intregal part of any discussion on future
recreation trail develo further4lLdressed in
this chapter_ U� e
Community input on trails was diverse and whether
expressed by trail proponents or those not interested
in new trail development, opinions about trails were
con'eyed with great passion. Community input
from these meetings highlighted the complexity
and challenges associated with defining community
goals for trails_ In response, the SE Group, a
consulting firm with expertise in trail design and
planning was engaged to facilitate additional
community involvement, to evaluate Vail's existing
trail system, to identify social trails, to define a broad
vision for Vail's trails and develop a conceptual trails
plan.
Comments below were made during
the community input process and are
representative of the wide range of
perspectives on trails:
"Vail can't be all things to all people"
"Vail should be a mountain biking mecca"
"Build a loop trail around the valley for
world-class connectivity"
"Make the Vail Trail hiking -only"
"We have an amazing place - let's work
with our existing trails with better signage
and maintenance"
"Natural trails as Vail's signature"
"Vail may not be a trails destination but
we need a trails update to meet existing
demand"
"Vail should be a place where kids can ride
a bike safely"
SMALL GROUP MEETINGS ON
TRAILS
Five small group meetings were held to
discuss the Town's recreational trail system.
The purpose of these meetings was to bring
divergent opinions together in small group
settings to explore in greater detail issues and
opportunities with trails. The goal of these
meetings was to find common ground for
how the Town's trail system can be improved.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 25 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
Approximately 25 people participated in these
meetings. Below are five themes with respect to
trails were drawn from these discussions along
with notable comments from these meetings:
Safety
• Work to minimize user conflict through
signage and education
• Safety concerns for all users in certain areas
of Town especially in the roundabout
• Complete paved trails segments where
possible to provide more off roadway
opportunities (for example, Vail Mountain
School to the East Vail Interchange)
• Prepare for the increasing prevalence of
electric assisted bikes or e -bike riders
• Improve wayfinding
Sustainability
• Limited trail expansion and coordinate
with neighboring communities instead of
signage or icon to follow)
• A soft surface trail parallel to Gore Valley Trail
could function as a commuting route for locals
and a beginner trail for guests. (some oppose
parallel trails)
• Overcrowding on existing soft surface trails
(especially Booth Falls trail) is an existing concern
— can these users be dispersed to other trails?
• Additional short connector trails between
neighborhoods (making it easier for kids to
ride to school or a friend's house)
• Convenient neighborhood access points for
hiking, biking, and local trips
• Improve connectivity to Vail Resorts' trails
• Build a trail connecting Vail to nearby
Towns (re. Minturn and Avon)
• Improve public access to trail information and
push it to hotels and businesses — maps, onl TRAILS COMMUNITY WORKSHOP
information, etc. which could help dispe
hikers and bikers A trails specific workshop was held to continue
• The adoption of social trails could alleviate the community's conversation about trails. The
congestion on existing trails 10 workshop was an open house format and
•s attended by approximately 40 people.
Bus service and connector paths to trailheads
could make trails accessible without a vehicle Information presented included an overview
Diversi
• Reduce user conflict by providing a vp�of trail
duplicating all trail types. "We can't be all
things, to all people"
• Wildlife concerns — ensure protection of•
important habitats and wildlife populati<�-
• Make improvements to existing trails to•
make them more sustainable to reduce
maintenance costs and preserve the
environment •
• Repair, improve, adopt and better utilize
existing trails and connections before
building new trails
• Consider maintenance options such as
volunteer groups, youth corps and trail
maintenance crews
• Vail's trails should continue to provide a
nature experience for locals and guests
Accessibility
• It is difficult to follow the Gore Valley Trail
especially through East Vail (need better
ri
types
Protect the existing Vail Trail as a small footprint,
meandering, hiking trail and provide other similar
trail types where possible
Provide beginner to intermediate mountain
biking trails
Provide easier walking trails for children, elderly,
and inexperienced hikers
Vail's topography is challenging for trail diversity
Currently other jurisdictions provide a wider
range of trail opportunities (particularly for
mountain biking)
Consider other trail activities when developing
trails such as fat bikes, e -bikes, snowshoes, etc
A pump track and beginner loop in Town could
provide mountain biking experience for children
Connectivity
• Improve connectivity of both hard and soft
surface trails
• Additional connector trails to Forest Service trails
may help mitigate trailhead parking problems
of the planning and approval process for trails,
the five trail themes that came out of the small
group meetings, an inventory of user created
social trails, trail usage on both social and
sanctioned trails, and design considerations
for trails. A Conceptual Trails Plan identifying
possible ideas for new trail segments was
also presented and additional trail ideas were
identified by community members during the
workshop.
workshops.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 26 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
A VISION FOR VAIL'S TRAILS
Based on input from the community throughout this update process, the vision for Vail's system of trails and pathways is:
A system of paved and soft -surface trails that is safe for all users. Through best practices in design, signage and education, trail users with
diverse needs and ability levels can safely recreate on trails in the Vail area. Educational and informational programs with an emphasis on
safety, awareness and respect for others are provided to trail users.
Trails are maintained to meet the highest standards for sustainability. Managing existing trails to maintain high standards takes priority
over expanding the trail network.
All trails are designed and constructed to respect and protect sensitive wildlife habitat and terrain while providing opportunities for both
residents and visitors to connect with and experience nature.
A variety of soft and hard -surface trails of varying difficulty levels are available to provide accessibility to all user groups.
Connectivity is key. Trails provide safe, non -vehicular connections between neighborhoods and important destinations in Town. Proper
signage will make trails easy to find and follow.
Trails in the Vail area are planned in concert with trails in the surrounding area. Continued collaboration with neighboring towns, Eagle
County, and the USFS is essential for a successful trail network.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 27 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
EVALUATION OF EXISTING TRAILS
The location and alignment of trails are
typically defined by terrain, site constraints
and opportunities, and objectives for creating
trail linkages or connecting trails to specific
destinations. Trail systems are not necessarily
bound by property ownership or political
boundaries. As such, the evaluation of existing
trails involve trails that are located or start within
Vail's boundary and trails in the surrounding
area. Factors considered in the evaluation of
existing trails included the number and length
of existing trails, agencies responsible for
trail management, type of trail (paved or soft
surface), trail user groups (multi -use, hiking only,
biking only) and trail ability level.
A total of 90 hard and soft surface trails totaling
nearly 200 miles were inventoried. While the
vast majority of these trails are located outside
of the Town's boundary, they are considered
part of Vail's trail system given their connectivity
and proximity to Vail. For example, only short
segments of East Vail trails (such as Booth Falls
and Bighorn), are located within the Town's
boundary, yet the entire length of these trails
are included in this inventory. The Two Elk trail
is well outside the Town's boundaries, but given
its connectivity to trails on Vail Mountain it is ,
included in this inventory. Charts and tables
below provide general information on existing
trails in the greater Vail area.
Throughout the greater Vail area there is a
relatively even distribution of easy, moderate
and difficult ability level trails. There is a high
percentage of easy ability multi -use trails,
however this percentage is skewed by the
large amount of paved trails, all of which are
considered easy ability level. The percentage
Greater Vail Network Trail Management -Percent of Total
• USFS • Vail Resort • TOV • CDOT • Eagle County/Avon
Greater Vail Network by Intended User Type -Percent of
Total
• Hiking • Biking • Multi Use
Greater Vail Network by Intended User Type, and Ability Level
Hiking
20%
Easy — 85Moderate — 35% Difficult — 56%
Biking
13%
Easy — 8% Moderate — 72% Difficult — 20%
Multi -Use
67%
Easy — 42% Moderate — 32% Difficult — 26%
Note: Numbers may not total due to rounding
of hiking only and biking only trails is relatively low.
This is largely a function of most USFS trails being
multi -use. Hiking only trails are primarily located in
wilderness areas and biking only trails are primarily
located on Vail Mountain.
The Town of Vail manages 19 miles of trails.
Approximately 17 miles of these are hard surface
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 28
trails and just 2 miles are soft surface trails.
Examples of soft surface trails include the Village
Streamwalk and the Vail Nature Center Trail. All
trails managed by the Town are easy ability level
trails. There are many other trail opportunities
within and proximate to Vail that are managed
by others. Vail Mountain includes a system of
interpretive, hiking, biking and freeride biking
trails, many of which are directly accessible from
Town. Eight USFS trailheads providing access
to multi -use and hiking trails are located in Vail.
Most Vail Mountain and USFS trails are in the
moderate and difficult ability level.
e trail inventory process employed trail -use
counters and identified more than 14 miles of
unsanctioned social trails. As expected, trail -
use counts revealed the highest level of use on
the paved paths, with up to 3,000 users per
week on sections of the Gore Valley Trail. As
for soft -surface trails, it is interesting to note that,
while lower, the use -level on non -sanctioned
social trails is significant when compared to
sanctioned trails. For example, the trail counters
estimate approximately 300-400 users per
week on sections of the sanctioned North Trail,
while some social trails see between 100-200
weekly users. Social trails are typically found
in areas where sanctioned trails do not exist,
often providing neighborhood access to a soft -
surface trail. This indicates the desire for people
to access trails from their homes, regardless of
proximity to official trails.
The map on the following page depicts existing
hard and soft surface trails and social trails in
and around the Town of Vail.
North Trail
Buffehr
Creek Trail
J North Trailer ,—
North Recreation
Trail
North Trail
Xf
""-Go
Tra
Son of Middle
Creek
EXISTING TRAILS
2018 Open Lands Plan - Update
Creek
� A .
X4
29
Booth Creek
Trail
I
y
Gore Valley
Trail
Vail Trail
Mill Creek
Road
Trail
Gore Creek
and Deluge
Lake Trails
Vail Pass
Bike Path
Existing Hard Surface Trails
Existing Soft Surface Trails
® Existing Social Trails
Chapter 4 - Trails
WILDLIFE AND THE GORE VALLEY
Input from the community was quite clear
that any new trail development be located,
designed, constructed and managed in a
sensitive and sustainable manner and that any
new trails not have significant impacts on the
natural environment or wildlife resources. The
community clearly values recreation trails and
clearly values our natural environment and
wildlife_ This raises the question - what is the
current state of wildlife in and around Vail?
The Gore Creek Valley has changed
dramatically since Vail was established in the
early 1960's and these changes, be it from the
growth of the Town and the population the
Gore Valley now supports, the size and level of
activity on Vail Mountain, Interstate 70, or the
increased year -around recreational activity in
and around Vail, there have been significant
impacts on wildlife habitat. A 2017 letter from
Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) documented
the United States Forest Service (USFS) and the
CPW. Presentations addressed the current state of
wildlife in the Gore Creek Valley, potential reasons
for the decline of some species, the importance of
quality habitat to the health of wildlife, how human
activity can impact wildlife and the potential for
implementing measures for mitigating impacts
on wildlife. A video of the Wildlife Forum is
available for viewing at hitp://www-vailgov-com/
wildlifeforum. Idoo
WILDLIFE AND RECREATION TRAILS `
Recreation trails can impact wildlife and wildlife
habitat many ways. The mere presence of human
activity from a hiker or biker will affect wildlife by
causing stress, affecting foraging time and generally
disrupting how typical behavioral patterns and
how habitat is typically utilized. These impacts
affect an animal's overall level of health and fitness,
its reproductive success and winter survival rates.
These impacts are particularly adverse in critical
wildlife habitat such as calving areas, migration
significant declines in the population of many
corridors and winter range areas. One thing is clear
species, particularly deer, elk and bighorn sheep,
- - any discussion of recreation trails cannot take
and that the long-term sustainability of these
place without a parallel discussion of wildlife_
species is in question_ Many factors could
attributable to these declining populations,
The CPW has prepared wildlife maps that can be
among them weather, disease, population
used to gauge potential impacts from trails and
management, loss of habitat, development and
uman activity on wildlife_ These maps are based
human disturbance_ While the current level
on data and findings from various wildlife studies,
of development in and around Vail is a major
they are not based on site-specific analysis_ That
factor, there is no question that human activity
said, these maps do provide a general indication of
from recreation trails directly impact wildlife and
factors to consider when studying how recreation
its habitat_ The 2017 CPW letter is found in the trails could affect wildlife_
appendix of this Plan_
Ares of Influence Mips
The Wildlife Forum involved a panel discussion The CPW has mapped "areas of influence" for
of wildlife in and around the Gore Valley. various species. Areas of influence are defined by
Presentations were made by two independent horizontal distances measured from a trail, within
wildlife biologists and wildlife biologists from which wildlife could be affected_ Distances are
based on data from wildlife studies and as
such do not take into consideration terrain,
vegetation or other site-specific considerations
that could influence how a trail may affect
wildlife_ The distances used to define the area of
influence vary by species_
CPW generated Area of Influence maps for
elk, mule deer, bighorn sheep and peregrine
falcon based on conceptual trail ideas from
early in this planning process. While general in
nature, this mapping provides a starting point
for understanding potential impacts from trails-
0o
rails_
0ies of these maps are found in the appendix_
te that the maps generated by CPW are
based on trail ideas that are different from what
is now presented in this Plan_ Nonetheless, they
do provide some context for understanding the
information provided by these maps.
Wildlife Resource Maps
CPW has mapped wildlife resources for many
different species_ These maps indicate the
general location of winter range, severe winter
range, calving areas, migration corridors and
other types of wildlife habitat_ The maps on the
following page depict the type of data provided
by CPW mapping_
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 30 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
Seasonal Habitat - Elk X -
Entire area is`identified as ' r f, r
Summer -R lai;ge and Overallange
' t *`• f r v '�
Y Ci f 4•r tY.
" r
ti
1■■■■■■1MEN ■■i ONE
EMMOMMEMED of No
INMEME MEN
ONE ,-
1'.\ is ■■■L _ ;+ 70
'Naomi /
VON[
04
■t ` +■■LJi : Migration
■■� ■■■■■
■■ �I■■■■Crossings
AEF I'mor
AEF Summer Concentration Area
■/1■■■■111■
■I 1■■■Ir"
Production Area
EE Severe Winter Range
llWinter Concentration-
' 1 2/ Winter. -
March 1, 0: N ,:
Seasonal Habitat - Bighorn Sheep
%F
*Fw
Poo
70
-pre.
17, AP*A*
Bighorn f
Bighorn
r , �'. _Bighorn f
IF 1.
Bighorn \
Bighorn \
0 1 2
Miles
Bighorn
March 1, 2018
I -.ml -,
70 -A -1
Seasonal Habitat - Mule Deer
1-70 Exit
# 173
1 0 1 2
mommommmomr—1
Miles
March 1, 2018 e 1
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
Y"
4
'A14
�Jc
AS7■
1-70 Exit sE
# 176
.4
(Vail)
J
1-70 Exit
# 180
(East Vail)
33
Migration Patterns
Highway Crossing
Concentration Area
Migration Corridors
Winter Range
Trail Density Maps
Trail density maps depict miles of trails per
square mile_ This data provides a general
indication of the intensity of trail activity within
a region. Below is a density map prepared by
CPW of existing trails within the Gore Valley
and surrounding area_ Green indicates areas
with fewer existing trails per square mile, while
red areas indicate more trails per square mile_
A basic premise when planning recreation
trails that are sensitive to wildlife is to locate
new trails within areas already influenced by
human activity_ The Trail Density Map provides
information helpful to this effort_ It should be
noted that the density maps depict trail density
only, they do not depict the impact of roads,
homes or other development or the amount of
use on any exisitng trail_
These maps and feedback from CPW during the
planning process were significant considerations
in defininci suggestions for new trail ideas_
MITIGATING MEASURES PRIOR TO THE trail closures, having dogs on leash and not
walking off trails are examples of behavior that
STUDY OF POTENTIAL NEW TRAILS will help minimize the impacts of trail use_ If
The CPW has documented significant declines in people understand the importance of being
certain wildlife populations in the Gore Valley and respectful and sensitive to wildlife resources,
the surrounding region and there is near universal they will be more likely to behave in a respectful
agreement that activity from recreation trails can and sensitive manner_ Educational programs
adversely impact wildlife populations and its habitats_ targeted to both locals and guests should be
In response to the existing condition of wildlife implemented_
resources in the Gore Valley and value the Vail
,,^
community places on wildlife, it is recommended Seasonal Trail Closures
that prior to the development of new recreation trails CPW has indicated that by and large, most
that the following steps betaken in an atterppt to people comply with seasonal wildlife trail
improve wildlife resources: cl ures. That said, using video cameras the
FS has documented extensive violations
Trail -Free Zones of a trail closure with the Town. However,
Areas that are free of t#e'
ils generally have very little the impacts to wildlife can be significant
human activity and th areas serve as wildlife when closures are violated_ Steps to improve
sanctuaries where animals benefit from solitude compliance with seasonal closures could
and the lack of disruption from humans. Defining include active monitoring of trailheads, taking
trail -free zones could be a great benefit to wildlife enforcement action against violators and
,A� Is resources_ Trail -free zones are constructing gates at trails with seasonal
depicted on the Conceptual closures_ These measures will require
Trails Plan_ These zones coordination with CPW and USFS_
are located on USFS land
and coordination with the
USFS would be necessary to
implement these zones. Areas
depicted are conceptual in
nature and will need further
study and refinement during
subsequent evaluation of trails
and wildlife_
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
Public Education
Educating the public on
how trail use can affect
wildlife can be very effective
in fostering behavior that is
sensitive to wildlife_ Respecting
34
Habitat Enhancement
Wildlife habitat has been impacted by
development, fragmentation and overall
declining health_ Options for improving habitat
by enhancing vegetation include: controlled
burns, fertilization and manual manipulation of
vegetation_ Coordination with CPW and USFS
should be initiated to define how the Town
could assist in programs to enhance habitat in
and around Vail_
Chapter 4 - Trails
CONCEPTUAL TRAILS PLAN
The Conceptual Trails Plan identifies twelve
soft surface trails and trail connections in and
around the Vail area that warrant further study
and community discussion. Referred to as
"trail ideas", each is described in detail below
and each is depicted on the Conceptual Trails
Plan. Trail ideas discussed below include both
the possibility of new trail development and
possibility of closing existing trails.
Trail ideas were derived from the analysis
of Vail's existing trail system, input received
during community scoping sessions and with
input from technical experts, agencies and
other stakeholders. A summary of community
input on trails is found in the appendix. The
purpose of the Conceptual Trails Plan is to
provide a vision for improvements to Vail's trail
system. A great deal of additional evaluation,
planning and design is necessary before final
decisions can be made on which, if any, of
these trail ideas are constructed. It is very likely
that with further study some trails depicted
on the Conceptual Trails Plan will be dropped
Parameters for defining the Conceptual Trails
Plan
Trail ideas evolved throughout this planning process.
Initially twenty-one new trail ideas were identified.
Each of these were evaluated based on the vision
for Vail's Trails and key themes that came out of the
small group meetings and the trails workshop. The
following parameters were used to determine the
wildlife resources. Wildlife and environmental
analysis for all trail ideas shall be completed as
an element of making final decisions on any
new trail development. Wildlife considerations
relative to trail ideas are discussed further in the
Description of Trail Ideas and Opportunity and
Process for Evaluation of New Trails sections
below.
trail Ideas to be Included In the Conceptual Trails
Plan: A plan depicting all trails originally considered
and trails dropped from consideration is found
• The trail is located such that it may be feasible in the Appendix. The Conceptual Trails Plan
through design, construction, management and is found on the following page. Each of the
mitigating measures to mini ize adverse impacts twelve trail ideas are discussed below. Follow-
on wildlife. 1 p actions necessary for the Town to address
• The trail be designed and constructed to be safe prior to the future development of any new
for all intended uses or the trail improves the trail are described in Chapter 5 Action Plan and
safety of the trail system
• The trail improves or expands recreatid ,
opportunities for one or more user group.
• The trail improves neighborhood connectivity
or provides beneficial lines between existing
trails.
When considering these parameters, nine trails were
Ji i t df ^ d t I t t I
from consideration due to design challenges, e "ClImie rom cons) era Ion_ n mos cases ral s
environmental or wildlife impacts, cost, public*were eliminated due to their potential for wildlife
input or other factors. A matrix summarizing impacts. The removal of these trails is not intended
each of these trail ideas is found below. o suggest that other trail ideas will not affect
Chapter 6 Implementation.
It should be noted that this planning effort
did not attempt to identify all minor trail
improvements that could establish other
pedestrian connections to improve walkability
throughout the Town. An example of this
could be a new trail along Middle Creek done
in conjunction with the redevelopment of the
Evergreen Hotel. These types of improvements,
while not identified in this Plan, may over time
be implemented by the Town.
2017 Open Lands Plan Update -Summary of Trail Ideas
# Trail Name
Suggested User Group
Suggested Ability Level
Supports Trail Vision
Issues/Concerns
1 North Trail to Davos Connector
Multi -use
Intermediate
Diversity, Connectivity
Wildlife
2 Avon/Nottingham Ridge Connector
Multi -use
Intermediate/Difficult
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
Wildlife, Easments
3 Intermountain Trail
Hiking -only
Intermediate
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
Wildlife
4 Matterhorn Trail
Hiking, Mountain Biking
More Difficult
Sustainability, Connectivity, Diversity
Wildlife, Safety, Sustainability
5 Intermountain to Lionshead Connector
Multi -use
Intermediate
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
Wildlife, Easments
6 Red Sandstone Valley Trail
Multi -use
ntermediate
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
Wildlife
7 Son of Middle Creek to Red Sandstone Road Connector
Multi -use
Intermediate
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
Wildlife, Easments, Terrain
8 Vail Mountain Cross Connector
Multi -use
Beginner/Intermediate
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity, Sustainability
Wildlife, Easements
9 Vail Trail
Hiking -only
Intermediate
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity, Sustainability
Wildlife, Easements, Terrain, Hazard Areas
10 Vail Trail Extension
Multi -use
Beginner
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
Wildlife, Peregrine Falcon Habitat, Hazard Areas
11 East Water Tank Trail
Hiking, Limited Mountain Biking
More Difficult
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity, Sustainability
Wildlife, Terrain
12 Two Elk Connector
Multi -use
Intermediate
Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity, Safety
Wildlife, Terrain, Easements
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 35 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
#7 - Son of Middle
to Red Sandstone
Road Connector
# Red Sandstone :`g" '+
y No TRAILS AREA-/
Valley Trail
Booth Falls
#2 - Avon/ Potato Patch ti
L Nottingham Ridge C D t Main Vail F
Connector _-_ r► E Interchange
` - #10 - Vail Trail
B4 �►- _ - Extension
i•{��#1 - orth Traif to ' - it M ntain
Dav Connector �/ oss Conne or Ford Park -Vail Trail No TRAILS AREA
West Vail 9
In erchange
#5 - Intermo ai
— - a ;,_ �,•'' " Lionshead ne
Inte oun i
r
r
_ { #4 - Matterhorn
No TRAILS AREA C. Trail
# = Intermountain
TrailPRO "Ni
nn ren
CONCEPTUAL TRAILS PLAN
2018 Open Lands Plan - Update I 36
Eas ail
lqterchange
_`.
#11 -East �;
Watertank Trail
#12 - Two Elk—
Connector
Existing Trails
+S%.•` Trail Ideas and Suggestions
New Paved Paths
Potential Children's Bike Facilities
Chapter 4 - Trails
DESCRIPTION OF TRAIL IDEAS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Below are descriptions of the twelve trail ideas depicted on the Conceptual
Trails Plan_ When relevant, factors unique to these trails ideas to be
considered in the subsequent study of these trail ideas are also provided
Trails are numbered sequentially from west to east, numbering does not
reflect trail priorities-
#11.
riorities_
#1. North Trail to Davos Connector:
Proposed multi -use trail to connect segments of the North trail to the Davos
Trail to create a moderate loop trail from West Vail.
• User groups: Multi -use
• Ability Level: Intermediate
• Supports Vision Goals: Diversity, Connectivity
• Issues/Concerns/Process: wildlife analysis, USFS approval
#2. Avon/Nottingham Ridge Connector:
Proposed multi -use trail to connect the North Trail to the existing
Nottingham Ridge Trail and future Traer Creek development in Avon. This
connection is identified in the current White River National Forest Travel
Management Plan.
• User groups: Multi -use
• Ability Level: Intermediate/Difficult
Supports Vision Goals: Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
Issues/Concerns/Process: Wildlife analysis, coordination with
Development Company, Town of Avon, USFS approval
a
#3. Intermountain Trail:
Existing social trail provides intermediate soft -surface hiking opportunity for
the Intermountain neighborhood. The upper reaches could be adopted/
improved as a hiking -only trail while the lower reach could provide hiking/
biking access to Trail Opportunity #5.
• User groups: Hiking -only
• Ability Level: Intermediate
Supports Vision Goals: Accessibility, Connectivity, Diversity
Issues/Concerns/Process: Steep terrain, safety, wildlife analysis, USFS
approval
#4. Matterhorn Trail:
Existing social trail connects Eagles Nest/Game Creek Trail down to the
Matterhorn neighborhood. If formally approved by USFS, trail should
be realigned in sections to improve sustainability and connected to
Trail #5. Potential wildlife impacts from this trail need to be evaluated
comprehensively with Trails #3 and #5_ An outcome of this analysis could be
to take steps to close the Matterhorn Trail.
• User groups: Hiking, mountain biking
• Ability Level: More difficult
• Supports Vision Goals: Sustainability, Connectivity, Diversity
• Issues/Concerns/Process: Steep grades, safety, wildlife analysis, USFS
approval
#5. IntermooGntain to Lionshead Connector:
Proposed multi -use trail to connect the Intermountain Trail (#3) to Hank's
Hideaway on Vail Mountain with several neighborhood trailheads to provide
access_ The alignment could pass through recent timber cuts as a way of
reducing environmental impacts.
• User groups:'Multi-use
• Ability Level: Intermediate
• Supports Vision Goals: Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity,
Issues/Concerns/Process: Wildlife analysis, evaluate private property
impacts, USFS approval
#G. Red Sandstone Valley Trail:
AFFoposed multi -use trail connecting Vail to existing and proposed trails in
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 37
the forest north of Vail. This soft -surface trail parallels Red Sandstone Road
and Piney Lake Road to provide a much safer alternative by providing trail
users an alternative to Red Sandstone Road_ This trail, if deemed feasible
from a design and wildlife impact standpoint, will need to be "tight" to Red
Sandstone Road in order to minimize habitat fragmentation and impacts
from trail use_
• User groups: Multi -use
• Ability Level: Intermediate
• Supports Vision Goals: Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity,
• Issues/Concerns/Process: Wildlife analysis, USFS approval
#7. Son of Middle Creek to Red Sandstone Road Connector:
This trail connects the Son of Middle Creek trail to Red Sandstone Road
through Town of Vail and USFS land above Red Sandstone School. This
connector creates an intermediate loop with the North Trail and provides
a loop alternative between Lionshead and Vail Village on the north side of
1-70.
Chapter 4 - Trails
• User groups: Multi -use
• Ability Level: Intermediate
• Supports Vision Goals: Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
• Issues/Concerns/Process: Terrain, private property impacts, wildlife
analysis, Town of Vail approvals, USFS approval
#8. Vail Mountain Cross Connector:
Potential soft -surface trail across the lower reaches of Vail Mountain utilizing
existing trail where feasible. Requires planning process and approvals with
Vail Resorts and USFS.
• User groups: Multi -use
• Ability Level: Beginner/Intermediate
• Supports Vision Goals: Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity, Sustainability
• Issues/Concerns/Process: Wildlife analysis, evaluate private property
impacts, USFS approval
#9. Vail Trail:
Existing social trail provides intermediate soft -surface hiking and limited biking
between Vail Village and the Golf Course Clubhouse. The trail currently
the falcon nest will likely include seasonal trail closures. Another potential
mitigating measure for the falcon nest could be to reduce the length of the
trail by linking it back to the Gore Valley Trail west of the nest to minimize
new activity with the nest's Area of Influence. Taking steps to close social
trails around the Vail Memorial Garden should also be considered_
• User groups: Multi -use
• Ability Level: Beginner
• Supports Vision Goals: Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
• Issues/Concerns/Process: Wildlife analysis/Peregrine falcon, geological
hazard areas, Town of Vail approvals, USFS approval
#11. East Water Tank Trail:
Existing social trail provides intermediate soft -surface hiking and limited
biking for the East Vail neighhood- Wildlife implications of this social
trail will need to be evaluated to determine whether this trail should be
formalized or whether ste�s should be taken to close the trail_ If efforts are
made to formalize this trail, the narrow width and scale of the existing trial
should be maintained, particularly with the westernmost leg of the trail
given steep terrain in this area.
crosses into USFS and private property and should be formalized with the • User groups: Hiking, limited mountain biking
property owners. Trail improvements are needed to address sustainability • Ability Level: More difficult
and accessibility_ This trail is recommended to be a hiking -only trail. Any • Supports Vision Goals: Accessibility, Sustainability, Connectivity, Diversity
work to improve this trail should maintain the width and informal, organic -Y Issues/Concerns/Process: Steep terrain, wildlife analysis, USFS approval
character of the existing trail_ 19& 01
• User groups: Hiking -only #12. Two Elk Connector:
• Ability Level: Intermediate This new soft -surface trail would connect the lower reach of the Two Elk
• Supports Vision Goals: Accessibility, Sustainability, Connectivity, Diversity Trail with East Vail, eliminating the need to access the Vail Pass bike path.
• Issues/Concerns/Process: Steep terrain, hazard areas, private property, The trail would align low on the hillside south of 1-70 and improve a long
wildlife analysis, USFS approval loop -trail for the Vail area. Wildlife implications of this trail will need to be
evaluated-
#110.
valuated_
#10. Vail Trail Extension: 0)"
New trail that provides a soft -surface alternative to the paved Gore Valley
Trail through the Town -owned Katsos Ranch Open Space. A peregrine
falcon nesting site is located in the vicinity of this potential trail and a
portion of the trail is located within Elk Winter Range and Transitional
Range. Analysis of how this trail may impact these wildlife resources will be
necessary to determine if this trail should be constructed and if so, to identify
any measures necessary to mitigate impacts on wildlife resources. The trail
alignment should be very close to the Gore Valley Trail to minimize habitat
fragmentation. Potential mitigating measures for elk winter range and
• User groups: Multi -use
• Ability Level: Intermediate
• Supports Vision Goals: Safety, Accessibility, Diversity, Connectivity
• Issues/Concerns/Process: Terrain analysis, private property impacts,
wildlife analysis, USFS approval
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 38 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
OTHER TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
Trail Improvements from the 1994 flan
Many of the trail and trail system improvements identified in the '94 Plan
have been completed. A number of improvements that have not been
implemented, such as the Vail Trail, the South Trail and a loop trail network
around the Town are included in the Conceptual Trails Plan. Below are
uncompleted improvements from the '94 Plan, most of which should still
be considered for implementation:
Vail Mountain Access
The Town should continue to work with Vail Resorts to improve trailhead
information, signage, etc. at Golden Peak, Vail Village and Lionshead.
The potential to expand the trail system on Vail Mountain should also be
discussed with Vail Resorts_
Neighborhood Trailheads
The '94 Plan identified trailhead improvements that would provide trail
connections to existing neighborhoods. The location and design of
these connections should be evaluated as a part of the design process for
potential new trails.
Paved Shoulders on Vail Valley Drive to Sunburst Drive
The '94 Plan suggested paved shoulders along Vail Valley Drive to provide
a safer connection between Vail Village and the Gore Valley Trail. The
potential for this path has been studied and due to narrow right-of-way
and existing improvements, this path is not considered to be feasible. As
an alternative, traffic calming measures for this road will be studied as part
of the update to the Town's Transportation Master Plan.
Paved Trails
The following trail segments would connect existing, paved multi -use
trail segments to enhance non -motorized connectivity. Refer to the
Conceptual Trails Plan for the location of these trails:
Intermountain to West Vail Interchange (#A)
Donovan Park to Westhaven Drive (#B)
West Lionshead Circle to East Lionshead Circle (#C)
Lionhead Parking Structure to Vail Municipal Complex (#D)
South Frontage Road to Meadow Drive Connector (#E)
Vail Mountain School to East Vail Interchange (#F)
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
Youth Facilities
Two ideas are suggested for improving bike opportunities for children:
Kids Bike Park/Pump Track
A series of short loops, dirt piles, jumps, etc designed for younger kids.
This idea was raised multiple times during community input meetings.
Potential locations include the Booth Creek 1-70 berms and Golden Peak.
Single Track Loop
A short loop trail on the upper bench of Donovan Park designed as
beginner hiking and kids mountain biking.
161
Trail Maintenance
The need for significant maintenance to three existing trails was identified:
North Trail (Buffehr Creek to Cortina Lane)
Existing multi -use trail has several eroded/poorly constructed trail sections.
Recommend working with the USFS to improve/reconstruct those sections
deeded.
Trail (Red Sandstone Road to Buffehr Creek Road)
,existing multi -use trail has several eroded/poorly constructed trail sections.
Recommend working with the USFS to improve/reconstruct those sections
as needed.
Buffehr Creek Trail
Existing multi -use trail could be improved with several short realignments
to improve usability and sustainability. Recommend working with the
USFS to improve/reconstruct those sections as needed.
Accessible Trails
Vail's parks, playgrounds, public buildings and other public facilities are
designed to be inclusive of varying ability levels_ Whether a person's
ability is affected by age or physical disability, the Town strives to provide
"accessible" public amenities_ When designing new trails or evaluating
existing trails, accessible paved and soft surface trails should be considered
as part of the process_
Paved trails are evaluated using criteria from the Americans with
Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)_ The U -S_ Forest Service
evaluates trails though the publication, Forest Service Trail Accessibility
39 I Chapter 4 - Trails
Guidelines (FSTAG), which allow for varying
direction from the Town Council for staff to prepare
levels of accessibility that are correlated with user
a more detailed plan for potential trail improvements.
experience for a given trail type. Accessibility
Like the Open Lands Plan update process, this
should be addressed as part of any subsequent
detailed trail planning process will involve public
work on a comprehensive trail plan as described
input and will essentially take the Conceptual Trails
in Chapter 4.
Plan to a higher level of detail. It is anticipated that
this trail planning process will involve revisiting
TRAIL TYPES AND STANDARDS
the need for and potential benefits of each trail
idea, defining trail alignments and other design
A variety of improvements to Vail's existing
considerations, and understanding trail constru
system of trails and paths are contemplated
and maintenance costs. In addition, site-specific
by this Plan. Hiking -only trails, multi -use trails,
environmental (soil and geologic conditions,
beginner level trails, paved trails and wide
vegetation and wetlands, etc) and wildlife analysis
shoulders are examples of these trail and path
will be completed in order to understand the
improvements. Standards for the design and
potential impacts of any new trail that is under
construction of paved and soft -surface trails will
consideration. Only after this additional planning
vary depending on the type of trail, intended
and analysis will the Town make decisions on
user groups, terrain and other considerations.
whether to pursue the development of any new or
Design standards will be one of many factors
alteration/adoption of existing ils.
in determining the feasibility of future trail
improvements. A summary of trail and path
Wildlife Analysis
types along with relevant design standards are
A mayor element of the next phase of work in
found in the appendix of this Plan.
evaluating the feasibility of new trail development
REGIONAL CONTEXT OF VAIL S
will be the completion of a detailed, comprehensive
environmental analysis, a key element of which will
TRAILS
be an evaluation of how trails could impact wildlife
The Regional Context Plan on the following
resources. It is anticipated that this evaluation will
page depicts existing trails and trail ideas in
be completed by a consultant retained by the Town
a broader context and how trails proximate
nd that the evaluation will among other things
to Vail interface with outlying trails and with
evaluate existing wildlife resources and habitats,
neighboring communities. The Regional
assess potential impacts that may result from trail
Context Plan also depicts potential trail
development, and identify whether it is feasible
improvements located outside of the area
to implement measures that could mitigate such
covered by the Conceptual Trails Plan.
impacts. The goal of this analysis is to provide a
comprehensive evaluation of all new trail ideas and
PROCESS FOR EVALUATION OF
existing and social trails in and around Vail. This
evaluation could result in both decisions to work
TRAIL IDEAS
toward the development of new trails and decisions
The process for studying the potential
to take steps to close existing trails.
development of any new trails will involve
a number of steps, the first of which will be
CPW will play a significant role in this process by
providing baseline information and by providing
referral comments during this process.
The findings of this environmental analysis and
specifically the wildlife evaluation will be a major
factor in the Town's decisions on whether
to proceed with any new trail development.
Ultimately the Town Council will decide
how to balance the community's desire for
recreational trails with the community's desire
that trails be sensitive to wildlife and other
environmental considerations. The purpose of
wildlife evaluation is to provide the Town
ith it
necessary to understand how
new trails may impact wildlife, and where a trail
may present impacts whether measures can be
implemented to mitigate them. While the Town
Council will make decisions on trails at the local
level, the USFS will be the ultimate decision -
maker on any trails located on USFS lands.
Information from this environmental analysis will
be included in formal applications to the USFS.
The potential to integrate this analysis with the
ecological/biodiversity study recommended for
Town lands (see Chapter 6 - Implementation)
should be considered.
USFS Process
Each of the twelve trail ideas depicted on the
Conceptual Trails Plan are located entirely or
in part on USFS land. As such, these trails will
involve review by the USFS.
The review of proposals for new trails on
USFS lands involves two steps. The USFS
process evaluates trails under the National
Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) and the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 40 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
t=.
Lost
,Lake
S
,
y
- ..
o'
-- Buffehr n�'
Buc� � Creek %k���
#6- Red Sandstone N.
Valley Trail , _� —
#2 - Avon/ ---.
von/ i�
Nottingham Ridge
Connector
FAVON
•
71- Nor4i Trail to
Y.
Davos CoZn ator
`
i
`EAGLEVAIL �� — �A Si
#3 - Intermountain
Trail
l
Meadow
Mountain
REGIONAL CONTEXT PLAN
#7 - Son of Middle
to Red Sandstone
Road Connector
�B P
V#8 - Vail Mountain
Cross Connector
#5 - Intermountain
to Lionshead
Connector
#4 - Matterhorn
Trail
s- \
\ Cour
\ Ridge
MIr4VRN
1241
4
#10 - Vail T.u„
Ttat+�
Two -1k `Frail
Bowman's
Short=cut_
#11 - East
Watertank Trail
#12 - Two Elk
♦ Connector
1
1
I
1
2018 Open Lands Plan - Update 1 41 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
Existing Trails
Trail Ideas and Suggestions
7-1
New Paved Paths
*
Potential Children's Bike Facilities
#11 - East
Watertank Trail
#12 - Two Elk
♦ Connector
1
1
I
1
2018 Open Lands Plan - Update 1 41 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
The first step with the USFS involves submittal
of a proposal that includes a comprehensive,
Town wide trails plan. This Town wide trails
plan will define trail alignments very broadly
with 200 yard wide corridors and will identify
user groups, trail levels and trail standards.
The trails plan will also involve coordination
with entities proximate to Vail so that trail
planning can be integrated with that of other
communities. Environmental information in
accordance with the NEPA process is also
required and all USFS processes include
opportunities for public input. Following
USES review of this initial step, if approved the
second step with the USFS involves detailed
design of proposed trails and more a detailed
NEPA process. As compared with step one
which involves the comprehensive trail system,
with step two individual trail segments can be
proposed for approval and construction.
A comprehensive outline of the USFS process i
found in the appendix.
EASEMENTS FROM PRIVATE LAND
OWNERS
Many of the new trail ideas within the Tow
In
will require the Town to obtain easements
from private land owners_ Chapter 5 — Action
Plan identifies privately owned parcels where
easements would be necessary to develop trail
segments within the Town boundary. Seven
such actions are recommended. Refer to
Chapter 5 Action Plan for information on these
easements.
Potential Collaborations
A number of the trails identified on the Conceptual
Trails Plan are located outside of the Town's
boundaries and would implement more regionally -
oriented trail improvements. Examples of these
include the adoption of the Matterhorn Trail and the
Avon/Nottingham Ridge Connector. It is likely that
if these trails are to be developed, they will involve
the Town collaborating with otherjurisdictions and&
organizations. Refer to Chapter 6 Implementation for
additional discussion on the implementation of trail
improvements. I
AQ
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 42 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
R
The Action Plan from the '94 Plan "provides a fr o�
manner'. The Action Plan chapter of the '94 address
10
recommendations for Town -owned lands an mprov
of recommendations for the acquisition of prope or e,-
were recommended to protect environmentally se e I
simplify the Town's boundary with adjacent United St
CHAPTER 5 - ACTION PLAN
a
rail""'
ai and protecting open lands as well as creating trail linkages in a logical and comprehensive
Dtecti chniques for open lands, established priorities for action, and provided land use
)s to t e
To
trail system. The most significant element of the Action Plan is a comprehensive list
nts necessary to implement the goals of the Plan. Referred to as Action Items, these acquisitions
to facilitate the development of trails, to obtain land needed for community oriented uses and to
t Service lands.
The Action Plan from the '94 Plan identified fifty-one parcels for acquisition or for obtaining easements. Since 1994, thirty of these Action Items have been
completed and another eight Action Items have been partially completed. Thirty of the fifty-one Action Items were recommended to protect environmentally
sensitive lands and sixteen were for trail development or for access to Gore Creek. Thirty-six of the Action Items were High Priority Items and twenty-five of these
high priority items have been completed. The Town has been quite effective in the implementation of Action Items from the '94 Plan. A plan depicting the status
of Action Items from the '94 Plan is found in the appendix.
The updated Action Plan on page 42 identifies twenty-eight Action Items that are recommended to implement improvements and recommendations described
in Chapters 2, 3 and 4 of this Plan. Like the '94 Plan, these Action Items recommend the acquisition of land or easements necessary to further the Town's goals
for the protection of environmentally sensitive lands, trail development and land needed for community oriented uses. Refer to Chapter 6 Implementation for
information on other follow-up actions recommended to implement the goals of this Plan. Each of these Action Items are discussed in greater detail below.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 43 1 Chapter 5 - Action Plan
2017 ACTION PLAN
The twenty-eight Action Items are shown two
ways - all Action Items are identified on the
Town wide Action Plan found on the following
page and each Action Item is depicted on more
detailed maps along with a description of the
Action Item. Descriptions address the purpose
for the action, whether the action involves the
acquisition of land or easements, the relative
priority for the action and other information
regarding the parcel and the recommended
action. There are four different categories of
Action Items:
Action Items from '94 Plan
Of the fifty-one Action Items from the '94 Plan,
thirty-eight were either implemented, partially
implemented, addressed alternative ways or the
Action Item has been deemed to no longer be
feasible. An example of an Action Item being
implemented alternative ways is the Town
acquiring an easement for the development of
a trail in lieu of the Action Plan recommendation
for outright purchase of the parcel. An example
of an Action Item no longer being feasible is
a vacant parcel that was recommended for
acquisition but was developed before it could
be acquired. Each of the thirteen uncompleted
items from the '94 Plan are included in this
updated Plan.
Action Items to Protect Environmentally
Sensitive Lands
Sixteen Action Items are recommended to
protect environmentally sensitive lands. These
items focus on land located adjacent to Gore
Creek or its tributaries, lands with access
challenges, steep terrain and wildlife resources.
The Action Items that address parcels located
along water courses and are intended to
reinforce the Town's initiatives to improve water
quality and protect wetlands and riparian habitat.
Strategies for Action Items involve the outright
purchase of land, working with land owners to
re -zone property or to establish conservation
easements to limit the development of the land or
other techniques to protect these lands.
Action Items to Implement Trail Improvements
Seven Action Items are recommended to facilitate
the development of new recreation trails or to
improve the Town's trail system. Strategies for these
Action Items involve either the acquisition of land or
easements.
i a
Action Items to Address Town/Community
Facility Needs
Six parcels are recommended for acquisition to
provide land for public facilities or community
needs. Three of these Action Items are sites that
could potentially be developed with affordable or
employee housing, two parcels clarify ownership
of a Town road and one parcel is for potential park
expansion. 1
Action Items listed above total more than twenty-
eight because some Action Items address multiple
goals_ A matrix summarizing all recommended
action items is found in the appendix.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 44
Enlargement Area -
Intermountain
/ACTION ITEMS
2018 Open Lands Plan - Update
Potato Patch
Area - Paee 47
1 Main Vail Booth Falls #19
Interchange
#12
/—#17 —� —
#14
#16
Enlar¢ement Area - Pale -
I45
Ford Park
- Action Item Parcel
as' —
#21
#22
Enlar¢ement Area -
East Vail
Interchange
Enlargement Area - Page 51
vun.rbcw�a
iwn o r�o i7m
#28
I
Chapter 5 - Action Plan
W
West Vail
Interchange
#2
a,
Intermountain
/ACTION ITEMS
rV,
Below are descriptions of the twenty-eight recommended Action
Items. Action Items are numbered sequentially from%est to east, the
numbering of Action Items does not imply priorty f from,?
implementation
ACTION ITEM # 1
Purpose= Establish connection from Intermountain neighborhood to
future soft surface trail.
Action - Obtain trail easement.
Other Information - Parcel is owned by the Eagle River Water and
Sanitation District. A water tank is located on the site.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item #6 from the '94 Plan.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
Other Information - Parcel is privately owned. Action Item #6 could provide
neighborhood connection if this easement cannot be obtained.
94 Action Plan - N/A
TIO M #4
urpose - Public facility or community use/affordable or employee housing.
Action - Acquire parcels.
sOther Information - Site consists of three parcels zoned Two-family Primary/
Secondary Residential that comprise 1.53 acres. Steep terrain on north half of
these parcels will limit development potential.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
ACTION ITEM #5
Purpose - Protect creek corridor land from development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation easement
or other measures to eliminate development potential.
Other Information - This .31 acre parcel is zoned Two-family Primary/
Secondary Residential. Bufferhr Creek and associated riparian habitat bisects
the site and floodplain impacts the site.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
46
Chapter 5 - Action Plan
ACTION ITEM #2
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation easement
-
or other measures to eliminate development potential.
Other Information - This 6.3 acre site is characterized by very steep terrain
and currently has no legal access. Development potential is limited. Parcel is
located outside of Tow undary.
I
'94 Action Plan - T parc I was Action Item #2 from the '94 Plan.
ACTION ITEM #3
Purpose - Establish trail connection from Highland Meadows neighborhood
to future soft surface trail. S
Action - Obtain trail easement.
rV,
Below are descriptions of the twenty-eight recommended Action
Items. Action Items are numbered sequentially from%est to east, the
numbering of Action Items does not imply priorty f from,?
implementation
ACTION ITEM # 1
Purpose= Establish connection from Intermountain neighborhood to
future soft surface trail.
Action - Obtain trail easement.
Other Information - Parcel is owned by the Eagle River Water and
Sanitation District. A water tank is located on the site.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item #6 from the '94 Plan.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
Other Information - Parcel is privately owned. Action Item #6 could provide
neighborhood connection if this easement cannot be obtained.
94 Action Plan - N/A
TIO M #4
urpose - Public facility or community use/affordable or employee housing.
Action - Acquire parcels.
sOther Information - Site consists of three parcels zoned Two-family Primary/
Secondary Residential that comprise 1.53 acres. Steep terrain on north half of
these parcels will limit development potential.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
ACTION ITEM #5
Purpose - Protect creek corridor land from development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation easement
or other measures to eliminate development potential.
Other Information - This .31 acre parcel is zoned Two-family Primary/
Secondary Residential. Bufferhr Creek and associated riparian habitat bisects
the site and floodplain impacts the site.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
46
Chapter 5 - Action Plan
-1
no
Red Sandstone
Road
1 ACTION ITEM #7
v ? Purpose - Public facility or community use/affordable or employee housing.
Action - Acquire parcel.
Other Information - This 1.76 acre parcel is zoned Public Accommodation and
g,45 has Special Development District approval for a hotel and affordable housing project.
Y' If the approved project does not proceed the site would be viable for an affordable/
employee housing or other community needs.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
ACTION ITEM #8
Purpose - Protect land from velopment and maintain wildlife movement
corridor.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation easement or
_ other measures to eliminate development potential. Prior to pursuing purchase
of this parcel monitoring of the site (with game camera) should be done to better
understand how wildlife may use this parcel.
#9 �` Other Informatio is .46 acre parcel is zoned Two-family Primary/Secondary
Residential. Big ga are commonly seen crossing parcel to access Gore Creek.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
Donovan Park
ACTION ITEM #9
g Purpose - Park expansion.
ACTION ITEM #G
Purpose - Establish trail connection from Highland Meadows
neighborhood to future soft surface trail.
Action - Obtain trail easement.
Other Information - Parcel is privately owned. Action Item #3
or the upper bench of Donovan Park could provide neighborhood
connections if this easement cannot be obtained.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
Action - Acquire parcel for expansion of Donovan Park.
Other Information - This 3.0 acre parcel has three tennis courts that are owned
and managed by the Hotel Talisa ownership group. In the event the ownership
group were interested in disposing of this parcel, the Town's acquisition could allow
for the expansion of Donovan Park for a variety of potential uses.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
ACTION ITEM # 10
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation easement or
other measures to eliminate development potential.
Other Information - This vacant 1.39 acre site is zoned Agricultural and
Open Space, is characterized by steep terrain and within a rockfall hazard zone.
Development potential is limited.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item # 14 from the '94 Plan.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 47 1 Chapter 5 - Action Plan
ACTION ITEM #111
Purpose - Establish trail connection.
Action - Obtain trail easement.
Other Information - This 1.3 acre parcel is privately owned. The Town of Vail ns land
on either side of this parcel. Easement on this parcel would provide trail design flexibility in
responding to surrounding terrain.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Jtem # 18 from the '94 Plan.
ACTION ITEM # 12
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation easement or other
measures to eliminate development potential_
Other Information - This vacant .32 acre parcel is owned by the ERWSD. It is zoned
Outdoor Recreation. Middle Creek runs through the parcel and both West Meadow Drive
and the Gore Valley Trail cross through the southern portion of the parcel.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
ACTION ITEM # 13
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive lands.
Action - Acquire parcel.
Other Information - This .1 1 acre parcel is privately owned
and zoned Public Accommodation. The parcel is within the
Gore Creek floodplain.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item #22 from the
'94 Plan.
ACTAM"frEM # 14
Purpose - Establish trail connection.
Action 6 Complete research to confirm if easement has been
obtained for this trail. If not, obtain trail easement for existing
paved recreatigR trail..
Other Information - This .10 acre parcel is privately owned
and zoned Agricultural and Open Space.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item #24 from the
"94 Plan.
ACTION ITEM # 15
Purpose - Establish trail connection.
Action - Complete research to confirm if easement has been
obtained for this trail. If not, obtain trail easement for existing
paved recreation trail..
Other Information - This 3.28 acre parcel is privately
owned and zoned Agricultural and Open Space.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item #23 from the
'94 Plan.
ACTION ITEM # 16
Purpose - Establish trail connection.
Action - Complete research to confirm if easement has been
obtained for this trail. If not, obtain trail easement for existing
paved recreation trail..
Other Information - This 47.9 acre parcel is privately
owned and zoned Ski Base/Recreation-1.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item #25 from the
'94 Plan.
Chapter 5 - Action Plan
Golf Course
Clubhouse
ACTION ITEM # 17
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive lands.
Action - Acquire parcel.
Other Information - This parcel is privately owned. It was to have
been included in the Town's purchase of land where the Vail Golf Club
was subsequently developed, but was not conveyed as a part of that
transaction. The parcel includes wetlands and the Gore Creek corridor.
'94 Action Plan - N/A M
ACTION ITEM # 18
Purpose - Maintain access to Vail Valley Drive.
Action - Acquire portion of parcel that includes Town roadway.
Other Information - This parcel is owned by the United States Forest
Service_
'94 Action Plan - N/A
---Booth Falls
#19
#20
Purple - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation
easement or other measures to eliminate development potential.
Other Information - This vacant 59 acre site is privately owned and zoned
Low Density Multi -family. The parcel is characterized by very steep terrain, is
within a rockfall hazard zone and has limited access potential. Development
potential is very limited.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
ACTION ITEM #20
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation
easement or other measures to eliminate development potential.
Other Information - This privately owned, vacant .65 acre site is zoned
Two-family Primary/Secondary Residential. The parcel is within the Gore
Creek floodplain. Development potential is very limited.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item #38 from the '94 Plan.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 49 1 Chapter 5 - Action Plan
East Vail '-�
Interchange
ACTION ITEM #21
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation
easement or other measures to eliminate development potential. '01
Other Information - This 2.16 acre parcel is owned by the Bighorn
Mutual Sanitation and Recreation District. A pond encompasses most
of the parcel.
'94 Action Plan - N/A 0)
ACTION ITEM #22
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development.
Action - Acquire parcel.
Other Information - This privately owned, vacant parcel is 45.2
acres and zoned Agricultural and Open Space. The parcel has no
legal access and is within avalanche, debris flow and rockfall hazard
areas.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item #44 from the '94 Plan.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
ACTION ITEM #23
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive portion of parcel, potential for limited
residential development.
Action - Acquire parcel.
Other Information - This 1.78 acre parcel is owned by the Colorado
Department of Transportation. Bighorn Creek bisects the parcel and the parcel is
impacted by a debris flow zone.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
ACTION ITEM #24
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development and or
mitigate development impacts on environmentally sensitive land.
Action - Acquire parcel if not developed by the land owner. If a development
application is submitted and approved, work with the land owner to establish a
conservation easement on the approximate 17 acres of Natural Area Preservation
property, and further mitigate for wildlife and other environmentally sensitive
abL5sues on the approximate 5 acres of developable property.
Other InformatioV If the land owner were to decide not to develop
this land at their 4Wr discretion, the Town should take steps to acquire the
property or work with the land owner to protect the land from development.
This approximate 23 acre parcel is within bighorn sheep range and should
be evaluated for habitat and rockfall hazards. The parcel had been incorrectly
identified as unplatted open space in the 1994 Open Lands Plan. During the
JWocess of updating this plan, the land owner was confirmed, and applied
for and received approval for subdivision and rezoning of the parcel to
approximately 17 acres Natural Area Preservation and approximately 5 acres
Housing.
'94 Action Plan - This parcel was Action Item #2 from the '94 Plan.
50
Chapter 5 - Action Plan
J
ACTION ITEM #25
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development.
Action - Acquire parcels or work with land owners on conservation
easement or other measures to eliminate development potential
Other Information - This Action Item includes four privatelyown
parcels, each of which are located almost entirely within the Gore eek
Corridor.
'94 Action Plan - N/A
ACTION ITEM #26
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from development and
potential trail development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation
easement or other measures to eliminate development potential.
Other Information - This 294 acre parcel is owned by the Mountain
Meadow Condominium Association. The parcel is within debris flow,
rockfall and avalanche hazards areas
'94 Action Plan - N/A
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
51
ACTION ITEM #27
Purpose - Protect environmentally sensitive land from
development.
Action - Acquire parcel or work with land owner on conservation
easement or other measures to eliminate development potential.
Other Information - This vacant 1.9 acre site is privately owned.
The parcel is characterized by very steep terrain, is within avalanche
and rockfall hazard zones and has limited access potential.
Developme�&otential is very limited.
'94 ActioWPIaM - N/A
.CTION ITEM #28
Purpose - To maintain access to Bighorn Road
Action - Acquire parcel.
Other Information - The parcel is owned by the Colorado
De artment of Transportation.
94 on Plan - This parcel was Action Item #50 from the '94
Plan.
Chapter 5 - Action Plan
CHAPTER 6 - IMPLEMENTATION
r _
'+�'' _ : - iii"
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS
Chapter 3 — Environmentally Sensitive Lands
identifies parcels to be acquired and/or protected
from development and addresses methods for the
protection of such lands -
Action Items from Action flan
The Action Plan identifies sixteen privately
52
presents itself, acquiring land via tax sale
would be a very cost effective way for the
Town to acquire property -
Donations - While closely related to benefits
from a conservation easement (see below,
a private landowners donation of land or
development rights to the Town could
provide tax benefits to the land owner -
Chapter 6 - Implementation
The Open Lands Plan provides a general framework
owned, environmentally sensitive parcels for
for the implementation of actions to achieve goals
acquisition and protection- Refer to Chapter 2
for the acquisition and protection of environmentally
Environmentally Sensitive Lands and Chapter 5
I
sensitive lands, the use and management of
Action Plan for additional information on these
Town lands and Town and community facilities
parcels- The first step in implementing these
'
and trails- Some recommendations, such as the
Action Items is for Town staff to work with the
acquisition of specific parcels or easement are very
Town Council to establish a work program
specific- These recommendations are outlined in
and priorities for Action Items to be addressed -
Chapter 5 Action Plan- Other recommendatio"A
Once priorities are determined, the initial step
referred to as Implementation Steps are addressed
will be for staff to initiate dialogue with land
�.
at a more general level and involve things like the
owners to gauge their interested in working
implementation of a program or a study necessary
with the Town on the acquisition of their
to proceed with
to make final decisions on if or 4n-
perry or on other steps to protect the land
implementing the goals of thisAn example
rom development (e -g- conservation easement,
of a follow-up study is the need to complete a
re -zoning, etc -)-
detailed environmental and wildlife analysis in
order to make final decisions on recreation trails.
Land Acquisitions
r
These types of general recommendations are
The '94 Plan identified techniques for the
s�
described in preceding chapters of this Plan- This
chapter describes the major Implementation Steps
acquisition of environmentally sensitive lands
and for the acquisition of lands for public
recommendedJi this Plan, suggestions on how
purposes or community use- These techniques
these recommendations can be addressed, the
remain valid today:
potential for collaborations and potential funding
Acquire fee interest - This traditional
.�
sourc%At the conclusion of this chapter is a
method involves paying fair market value to
matrixmm, all Implementation Steps. It is
P P
a willing seller for full fee interest in the land -
9
recommended
recommended that Town Staff meet with the Town
A purchase using terms or installments
Council on an annual basis to define priorities and
could be beneficial to both the Town and
lish a work program for implementing the goals
the seller -
,6f this Plan-
Tax Sale - If or when the opportune
r _
'+�'' _ : - iii"
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS
Chapter 3 — Environmentally Sensitive Lands
identifies parcels to be acquired and/or protected
from development and addresses methods for the
protection of such lands -
Action Items from Action flan
The Action Plan identifies sixteen privately
52
presents itself, acquiring land via tax sale
would be a very cost effective way for the
Town to acquire property -
Donations - While closely related to benefits
from a conservation easement (see below,
a private landowners donation of land or
development rights to the Town could
provide tax benefits to the land owner -
Chapter 6 - Implementation
• Bargain Sale - This is a combination of a
donation and sale of land or development
rights. Bargain sales are considered when
a land owner cannot afford to donate the
entire value of a property.
Funds generated by the Town's RETT are one
potential source of revenue for land acquisitions.
Great Outdoors Colorado (LOCO) programs
are another potential funding source. LOCO
programs include grants for conservation
easement transaction costs and grants for open
space acquisitions. The Eagle County Open
Space Program is another source of funding
that should be pursued.
Conservation Easements on Private Land
Conservation easements limit development
opportunities and protect privatelyowned
lands from development in a way that can be
beneficial to the land owner and to the Town.
The benefit to the Town is that a conservation
easement would protect the land without the
Town expending funds to purchase the land
in fee. The land owner may realize tax be
for the donation of the conservation easement.
There are also funding sources available for
landowners to assist with implementing a
conservation easement The Town could
collaborate with a land owner and land trust
on conservation easements. For example, the
Town could purchase land outright then work
with a land trust to obtain grants (to offset
the purchase price) in exchange for placing
a conservation easement on the land. The
Town could also assist a land trust in acquiring
a conservation easement by providing funding
to reimburse the land owner for the value of
the development rights they will be giving up.
These and other opportunities should be explored
by the Town.
Designated Open Space and Conservation
Easements
This Plan discusses two approaches for how the
Town can protect Town -owned open space
parcels — the Designated Open Space process and
conservation easements. Twenty-six Town -owned
parcels are eligible to be dedicated as Designated
Open Space. In addition, this Plan identifies
four parcels for consideration of conservation
easements. It is recommended that Town Staff
initiate a detailed evaluation of these parcels and
prepare recommendations for which parcels, if
any, warrant being dedicated as Designated Open
Space and which parcels, if any, may warrant
protection via a conservation easement. This
effort should be supported by a citizen's task force.
The findings of this evaluation would then be
presented to the Designated Open Space Board
of Trustees who would make decisions regarding
any recommendations to the Town Council
regarding both Designated Open Space parcels and
conservation easements.
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY
NEEDS/USE AND MANAGEMENT OF
TOWN LANDS
Workforce Housing
The Action Plan identifies four parcels of land
for potential acquisition for the development of
employee/affordable housing and Town facilities.
Town staff should initiate dialogue with these
land owners to gauge their interest in selling
their land. If the landowner(s) have an interest in
selling and upon direction from the Town Council,
conceptual site/development feasibility studies
should be completed to better understand the
development potential of these parcels. The
Vail Housing Authority can play a role in these
evaluations and assist in the acquisition of the
potential housing parcels.
Public Facilities and Community Needs
There were a number of public facilities and
community needs that were discussed during
the preparation of this update. An expanded
snow dump, solar farm, disc golf course, and
event or performing arts centers are some
examples of these. While specific locations for
W,
and other facilities are not provided by
this Plan, it is assumed that one or more of these
ideas may be pursued if or when directed by
the Town Council.
Management of Lands for Biodiversity
The protection and preservation of vegetation,
aquatic resources, riparian and wildlife habitats
found on Vail's open lands is an important
community priority. Enhancing these resources
and making sound decisions regarding the use
and management of Town lands is an objective
of this Plan. In order to better understand
the natural resources of Vail's open lands, it is
recommended that a comprehensive study of
existing conditions be completed, monitoring of
these resources be implemented and programs
for enhancing these resources be implemented.
Evaluation of the types and health of landscape
and vegetation, habitat sub -types, hydrologic
systems and wildlife resources are examples of
what could be considered by this study. It will
also be important to understand how existing
management and use of Town open lands
effects these resources. An outome of this effort
should be formal policies for the management
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 53 1 Chapter 6 - Implementation
of Town lands. For example, management
policies may vary depending upon the zoning,
the use or the existing site characteristics of
open lands. This effort should be completed
with assistance by an ecological -oriented
consulting firm with the underlying objective
being to enhance the biodiversity of the Town's
open lands.
Routine Maintenance of Town Open
Lands
The Town's Public Works Department
currently manages Town -owned open lands.
This effort should be formalized to establish
a comprehensive program for the routine
maintenance of lands that includes, among
other things, periodic inspection of lands,
weed control and vegetation management,
Wildlife Enhancements
In response to the existing condition of wildlife
resources in the Gore Valley and the value the Vail
community places on wildlife, it is recommended
that prior to the development of new recreation
trails, that the following steps be taken in an attempt
to improve wildlife resources:
• Better define Trail -Free zones depicted on the
Conceptual Trails Plan
• Public Education
• Enforcement of Seasonal Trail Closur
• Habitat Enhancement ***6A i
IN
The Town should initate dialogue with CP�and
USFS on these initiatives_ A
Action Items from Action Plan
The Action Plan identifies the need for sev
maintaining of signs and other facilities, clearing easements or land acquisitions that would be
of litter, maintaining drainage, etc. Appropriate necessary to implement Trail Ideas- -No action is
staff and budget should be established to necessary on these Action Items until environmental
implement this program. Management and wildlife evaluations are completed and decisions
programs should be refined based on the made onfuture recreation trails_ Decisions on
findings and policies that may result from the ea ements and I acquisitions will be made at a
bio -diversity study described in the preceding later date. '
section_
RECREATIONAL TRAILS
This Plan identifies twelve ideas for potential
improvements to the soft surface trail system
in and around Vail. These ideas include
the potential for new trails, the adoption,
or formalization of existing social trails or
the closure of social trails_ These trail ideas
and the process for further study and for
obtaining approval from the USFS for new
trails, easements necessary for new trails and
the potential for collaboration with other
organizations are discussed in Chapter 5 - Trails.
USFS Trails and Trailheads
Eight trailheads within the Town of Vail provide
access to trails on USFS lands. A number of these
trails are new or have been improved in recent
years. In many cases the current use of these
trailheads is significant, to the point where the trail
experience is compromised and there are issues
with congestion at the trailheads. This is particularly
true with the Booth Falls trail and others in East Vail.
The Town should initiate dialogue with the USFS
to discuss options for addressing the use of these
trails and implementing necessary management
programs.
Vail Resorts and Vail Mountain Trails
Vail Resorts manages a network of interpretive,
hiking and biking trails on Vail Mountain. A
number of these trails extend into the Town of
Vail. Vail Mountain trails represent a significant
percentage of the soft surface recreational trails
located proximate to or accessible from the
Town. While Vail Resorts has no immediate or
long-term plans to expand their system of trails,
the Town should continue dialogue with Vail
Resorts regarding any future trail improvement
plans. Coordination with Vail Resorts will be
needed on Trail #5 Intermountain to Lionshead
Connector and Trail #8 Vail Mountain Cross
Connector, both of with are located partly or
entirely on Vail Mountain.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 54 1 Chapter 6 - Implementation
Trail Maintenance
The Town of Vail currently maintains all paved
and sanctioned soft -surface trails within its
boundaries. In addition, the Town maintains
the Gore Valley Trail between the Intermountain
neighborhood and Highway 6/24 in Dowd
Junction. Other trails within the greater Vail
network are managed by the USFS, CDOT, ECO
Trails and Vail Resorts. Any new soft -surface
trails outside of Town boundaries may require
that the Town become more active in trail
management and trail maintenance. The Town
should explore maintenance collaborations
with Eagle County Adopt -a-Trail (a USFS and
Vail Valley Mountain Bike Association program),
Friends of Eagles Nest Wilderness, Vail Resorts
EpicPromise and the Colorado Youth Corps,
Trail Use/Education and Outreach
During community input sessions many
concerns were expressed about the Town's
• Adding informational signs at trailheads to
address topics such as wildlife considerations or
trail closures, alerting users to trails being open
to multi -use and information on the ability level
existing trail system. Among these concerns 40f the trail.
were improving the quality of signs and
wayfinding, trail etiquette (specifically conflicts Outreach Program
with different user groups and overcrow Establishing outreach programs to provide
at popular trails). These concerns can be information on Vail's trails was considered a viable
addressed by a combination of improved way to improve the trail experience for all trail users.
signage and community outreach programs. Outreach programs could provide information on:
• Trail etiquette, specifically with regards to
Signage respecting other users on multi -use trails,
• An evaluation of all directional signs should • Wildlife or other seasonal closures,
be completed and as deemed necessary a
program for improving these signs should
be implemented,
Provide trail maps at all trailheads,
Adding signs on multi -use trails at
switchbacks and blind spots alerting users to
be aware of other trail users, and
• Trail maps, information on ability levels, etc.,
• Encouraging the use of under-utilized trails in
the area (to disperse users from over -crowded
trails), and
• Proper planning for trail use (clothing, food and
water, emergency supplies).
Information addressing these and other topics
could be provided to trail users via local bike
shops, the Town's visitor centers, the Town's
web page and by local hotels.
CONCLUSION
As an element of the Town of Vail
Comprehensive Plan, the 2018 Open Lands
Plan Update addresses opportunities for the
acquisition and protection of sensitive lands,
provides recommendations on the use of Town
lands and outlines steps to take in evaluating
rsting and future recreation trails. The Plan
provides the Vail Town Council and the Vail
community with a framework for future actions
and decision-making regarding each of these
topics. While in many regards the Plan provides
fairly explicit direction, the Plan is a master plan
document and as such the Plan is general in
nature. As noted throughout the Plan, much
additional work, analysis and community
involvement will be necessary prior to making
future decisions.
This Plan is an update to the 1994 Open Lands
Plan. It is recommended that this Plan be re-
visited in the next five to ten years.
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 55 1 Chapter 6 - Implementation
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED IMPLEMENTATION STEPS
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Work Program - Town staff to meet annually with the Town Council to define priorities and establish a work program and budget for
Environmental/Community
Town Council
implementing the goals of the Open Lands Plan.
Development, Public Works
Environmentally Sensitive Lands
Designated Open Space Board of Trustees - Assign members to, and reconvene, this Board.
Environmental/Community
Town Council
Development
Designated Open Space — With assistance from a Citizens Task Force, analyze the 26 parcels that currently qualify to be Designated Open
Community Development, Public
Designated Open Space
Space and make recommendations on which parcels, if any, should be considered for designated. Evaluate the Designated Open Space
Works
Board of Trustees, Town
process to identify potential Charter amendments that could improve the effectiveness of the program.
Council
Conservation Easements - With assistance from a Citizens Task Force, evaluate the appropriateness of establishing conservation
Environmental/Community
Town Council
easements on Town-owned lands and identify lands that could benefit from protection by conservation easement.
Development, Public Works
Action Plan - Reach out to owners of environmentally sensitive lands indentified for acquisition or protection on the Action Plan, monitor the
Environmental/Community
availability of such parcels.
Development
Town-Owned Lands and Use of Lands
Biodiversity - Initiate a comprehensive study of lands containing important biodiversity values, such as vegetation, aquatic resources,
Environmental/Community
PEC, Town Council
riparian and wildlife habitat, to understand existing conditions to identify programs for the enhancement of these resources. Develop formal
Development, Public Works;
policies for the management of Town-owned lands for biodiversity.
Consultant
Maintenance of Town-owned Lands - Develop a program for maintenance of the Town's open lands, open space and trails. Identify funding
Environmental/Community
Town Council
requirements for such programs.
Development, Public Works;
Consultant
Wildfire and Safety - Coordinate the efforts of Vail Fire & Emergency Services to manage vegetation to minimize the potential threat of
Environmental/Community
wildfire in and around Vail with other Town management efforts.
Development, Public Works, VFES
Action Plan - Reach out to owners of parcels indentified for acquisition on the Action Plan, monitor the availability of such parcels.
Environmental/Community
Development
Trails
Public Education - Implement a public education program addressing how trail use affects wildlife, the importance of respecting trail
Environmental/Community
Town Council
closures, and how to be respectful and sensitive to wildlife resources when using trails.
Development, Public Works,
Community Information Officer
Wildlife Habitat Enhancement - Work with Colorado Parks and Wildlife and the United States Forest Service to collaborate on programs to
Environmental/Community
Town Council
enhance wildlife habitat.
Development, Public Works
Seasonal Trail Closures - Work with Colorado Parks and Wildlife and the United States Forest Service to improve compliance with seasonal
Environmental/Community
closures via education, enforcement and installation of gates at trailheads.
Development, Public Works
Trails Plan - Initiate a comprehensive trails plan process to include the evaluation and further study of trail ideas identified in this Plan and a
Environmental/Community
Town Council
comprehensive environmental and wildlife analysis to be used in future decision-making regarding any new trail development.
Development, Public Works,
Consultant
Trail-free Zones - As an element of the comprehensive environmental and wildlife analysis, refine the recommended trail-free zones
Environmental/Community
Town Council
identified on the Conceptual Trails Plan and coordinate with the United States Forest Service on actions that could be taken to establish trail-
Development, Public Works,
free zones.
consultant
Action Plan - As may be necessary depending upon the outcome of detailed trail planning, reach out to owners of parcels indentified for the
Environmental/Community
acquisition of easements necessary for trail development.
Development
Collaborations - As may be appropriate, coordinate with other organizations such as Vail Resorts and Eagle County on the planning and
Environmental/Community
evaluation of potential new trails.
Development, Public Works,
Consultant
Community Outreach - Establish outreach programs targeted to both locals and visitors to provide information on trail use, trail etiquette
Environmental/Community
Town Council
and trail opportunities in the area.
Development, Public Works,
Community Information Officer
Signage and Wayfinding - Evaluate existing signage, wayfinding and maps and prepare a comprehensive program for improving signage.
Environmental/Community
PEC, Town Council
Development, Public Works,
consultant
Existing Trailheads - Work with the United States Forest Service on the maintenance and management of existing trails and trailheads.
Environmental/Community
Town Council
Involve other stakeholders in this effort.
Development, Public'
2018 Open Lands Plan Update 1 56 1 Chapter 6 - Implementation
APPENDIX
-1994 Open Lands Plan
- Status of Action Plan Parcels and Trails from the '94 Action Plan
-Summary of Action Items
- Summary of Real Estate Transfer Tax Ordinances
- Designated Open Space procedures
- USFS Process 4r
-Trail Types and Standards
- Conceptual Trails Plan/Trails Dropped from Consideration
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife -Wildlife in the Gore Valley
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife -Wildlife Influence Area Maps
- Trail Scoping Session Minutes -September 2017
2018 Open Lands Plan Update
/_1a,UIDIK1
-1994 Open Lands Plan
- Status of Action Plan Parcels and Trails from the '94 Action Plan
-Summary of Action Items
-Summary of Real Estate Transfer Tax Ordinances
- Designated Open Space procedures
- USFS Process
- Trail Types and Standards
- Conceptual Trails Plan/Trails Dropped from Consideration
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife -Wildlife in the Gore Valley
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife - WInflu")nce Area Maps
-Trail Scoping Session Mins - Septembk&,r 2017
4
2017 Open Lands Plan Update
Town of Vail
PAP
"r 4
Town of Vail
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Comprehensive Open Lands Pian
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Real Estate Transfer Tax History and Budget.....................................................3
®
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................2
Prepared by:
Table 4 Existing Trail Facilities...........................................................................................6
Concept Plan...................................................................................................12
DESIGNWORKSHOP®
Exhibit 4
Introduction.................................................................................................................3
Table7 Priority Actions.....................................................................................................14
Purpose/ Mission Statement
Table8 Action Parcels........................................................................................................20
166017th Street, Suite 325
Table 9 Protection and Management Techniques for Action Parcels ..........................21
History of Vail
Table10 Six Year Plan........................................................................................................27
Denver, Colorado 80202
Current Trends
(303) 623-5186
Inventory.....................................................................................................................4
Open and Undeveloped Lands
Land Zoned Open Space
Outdoor Recreation Inventory
Trails Inventory
Design Workshop Team
Environmentally Sensitive Land
Carol Adams
Mary Dewing
®
Needs Assessment/ Public Input Process..............................................................7
Marty Zeller
Open Space and Recreation
Public Facilities/ Land Reserve
Open Lands Steering Committee
®
Concept Plan..............................................................................................................11
Environmentally Sensitive Lands
Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor of Vail
Activity Centers and Connections
Tom Steinberg, Vail Town Council Member
Cybill Navas, Vail Town Council Member
Jim Shearer, Vail Town Council Member
®
Action Plan................................................................................................................11
Larry Grafel, Acting Town Manager
Protection Techniques
Diana Donovan, Planning and Environmental Commission
Priorities for Action
Kathy Langenwalter, Chair
Planning and Environmental Commission
Comprehensive List of Recommended Actions
Greg Amsden, Planning and Environmental Commission
Recommendations for TOV Owned Parcels
Jeff Bowen, Planning and Environmental Commission
Trails and Trailheads
Bill Wilto, Vail Board of Realtors
Rich Phelps, USFS
Land Management
Mack Hodge, Vail Board of Realtors
...................................................................................................24
Rob Robinson, Director - Vail Recreation District
Forest Service
Joe Macy, VaiiAssociates
Vail Associates
Town of Vail Property Management
Town of Vail Staff
Pritz, Director Community Development
®Kristen
Implementation.......................................................................................................25
of
Funding Sources
Russ Forrest, Project Manager, Community Development
Phasing
Greg Hall, Acting Director of Public Works
Todd Oppenheimer, TOV Landscape Architect
Next Steps
Mike Mollica, Community Development
Five Year Plan
Jim Curnutte, Community Development
George Ruther, Community Development
Photo Credits
David Lokey
Scott Martin
Jeff Andrey
Comprehensive Open Lands Pian
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Real Estate Transfer Tax History and Budget.....................................................3
Table 2 Ownership of Zoned Open Lands in Vail...........................................................4
Exhibit 2
Table3 Park Facilities...........................................................................................................6
Table 4 Existing Trail Facilities...........................................................................................6
Concept Plan...................................................................................................12
Table 5 VA and USFS Trails................................................................................................7
Exhibit 4
Table 6 Assessment of Previous Plans/ Documents.......................................................9
Table7 Priority Actions.....................................................................................................14
Action Plan......................................................................................................19
Table8 Action Parcels........................................................................................................20
Exhibit6
Table 9 Protection and Management Techniques for Action Parcels ..........................21
Table10 Six Year Plan........................................................................................................27
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1
Existing Open Lands Map...............................................................................5
Exhibit 2
Hazards and Sensitive Areas..........................................................................8
Exhibit3
Concept Plan...................................................................................................12
Exhibit 4
Priority Plan....................................................................................................15
Exhibit5
Action Plan......................................................................................................19
Exhibit6
Trails Plan........................................................................................................23
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Land Ownership Adjustment Process..................................................31
0
Town of Vail
■ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The objectives of the Comprehensive Open Lands
Plan plan are:
• To identify citizen and visitor needs and
preferences for a comprehensive SYSTEM of
open space uses such as parks, recreation,
protection of environmental resources, trails,
and reserve lands for public uses;
• To prioritize available open lands for acquisi-
tion or protection;
• To identify creative strategies to implement
the acquisition and protection program; and
• To define a management system to appropri-
ately manage Town -owned open space lands.
• To buffer neighborhoods with open space
An Open Lands Committee provided direction for
the project and consisted of representatives from the
Vail Town Council, Planning and Environmental
Commission, U.S. Forest Service, Vail Associates, Vail
Recreation District, Board of Realtors, and Town
Staff.
The public involvement process consisted of four
well -attended public meetings between August of
1993 and January of 1994. These meetings, along
with a thorough review of all relevant planning and
survey documents for the Town, resulted in a priority
ranking of needs and uses for open space lands and
recreational opportunities. This input led directly to
the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan which identi-
fies specific parcels and activities that should be pur-
sued by the Town in order to realize the goals stated
in both the public forum and previous community
input on related plans.
The priorities for open space and recreation needs
communicated by the citizens of Vail are, in order of
priority:
1. Acquisition, preservation and protection of
natural open space;
2. Improvement of the trail and bike path sys-
tems in and around the Town; and
3. Creation of additional recreation opportuni-
ties in a regional context including a swim-
ming pool, athletic fields and a recreation
center.
The concepts presented in this plan, developed as a
result of this public input, describe connecting exist-
ing trail systems that are either incomplete or not
interconnected, adding an extensive new trail system
that essentially surrounds the Town and better inter-
faces with the National Forest System Lands and Vail
Mountain, and protecting sensitive lands that are
either along Gore Creek or part of the forest that
extends into the Town. Extension of the streamwalk
from the Village Core into Lionshead is desired by
the community but objectionable to the adjacent
property owners who fear loss of privacy and
degraded views.
The Comprehensive Open Lands Plan is an action -
oriented plan that identifies specific parcels of land
that require some kind of action for either protection
of sensitive lands, for trail easements and critical trail
connections or for future public use, such as a West
Vail fire station. Over 350 parcels were evaluated
with fifty-one parcels of land on which actions are
recommended. Recommended actions range from
acquisition by the Town, trade with the U.S. Forest
Service, acquiring trail easements, or purchasing
development rights. In many cases, several options
are available on a specific parcel, allowing flexibility
in negotiations for both the landowner and the Town.
The objective has been to provide the Town with a
menu of potential open space protection techniques
at the least cost and management burden to the
Town. For example, if an easement can be obtained
from the landowner for a trail or to protect a site
from development, generally this has been proposed
as an alternative to outright acquisition. As a result,
the land stays on the tax rolls and the Town is not
responsible for general property management and
maintenance. These "reduced rate" transactions can
be beneficial for landowners since they can provide
certain tax and estate planning benefits which meet a
landowners financial objectives. A careful tailoring
of transactions between landowners and the Town
can produce mutually beneficial results.
Specific criteria were developed to evaluate these rec-
ommended actions in order to determine the areas of
highest priority. Generally, actions received a high
priority if they met the stated objectives of the Town
and its' citizens and were an integral part of the open
lands system. Within these fifty one parcels, there
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
are five priority areas made up of a number of recom-
mended actions. These priority areas, shown on the
Priority Plan in Exhibit 4 are (in order of priority):
1. Protect sensitive natural habitat areas, ripari-
an areas, and hazard areas;
2. Extend the Vail Trail to East Vail and add
several trailheads to access the trail;
3. Add a new trail on the north side and west-
ern half of Town to connect existing trail -
heads and neighborhoods;
4. Add three "trailheads" in the core areas to
access Vail Mountain trails and inform visi-
tors of trail opportunities and provide better
access to Gore Creek;
5. Add bike lanes to the north and south
frontage roads (the entire length of Town)
and add paved shoulders to Vail Valley
Drive.
For the past 13 years, the Town has had the use of tax
funds generated from a Real Estate Transfer Tax
(RETT) for the purchase of open lands and develop-
ment and maintenance of parks and trails. This fund
can and should now be better leveraged to take
advantage of the opportunities of both GOCO ("Great
Outdoors Colorado") and other State funding and
mutually beneficial negotiations with property own-
ers.
The Town should now enter into a new cooperative
management system with the U.S. Forest Service and
Vail Associates Inc. to provide outdoor recreation
and open space preservation. With adoption of this
plan, there will be added management and mainte-
nance requirements for the Town. The maintenance
fund from the RETT Tax will need to grow in
response to these new management requirements.
Additionally, open space protection must go beyond
zoning to ensure long-term protection. Options for
this longer term protection may include requiring a
public vote to change uses on open space lands or
the use of a land trust to hold conservation easements
on lands.
0
Town of Vail
®INTRODUCTION
HOW THE DOCUMENT IS ORGANIZED
This document is a result of a comprehensive look
at the Town of Vail and its citizens and visitor
needs in terms of open space, parks, and recreation
issues and public facility needs. The resulting Action
Plan, which is described in detail in this document,
includes specific recommendations for trails, trail -
heads, open lands and protected parcels, and parcels
intended for other community needs (such as an
additional fire station).
The document first describes the identified needs of
the Town, the overriding concept or framework for
addressing these needs in a comprehensive manner,
and then specific prioritized actions to meet these
needs.
PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
The purpose of this plan is to identify and develop
strategies for acquiring or protecting key remain-
ing open lands in Vail that would be valuable for
recreation, protecting sensitive environmental
resources, extending or connecting trails, providing
adequate neighborhood open space, and creating a
small amount of contingency land for unforeseen
needs (e.g. employee housing, public facilities).
These "public needs" lands, while included in this
Plan, would be purchased from sources other than
the RETT fund.
This Plan pulls together a variety of activities that the
Town has been working on. The Town is in the
process of creating an inventory of its land; revising
the zoning language for existing open land zones;
working on a Land Ownership Adjustment Plan
(LOA) with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) to coopera-
tively develop a desired ownership pattern and read-
ily identifiable common TOV and National Forest
System boundary; developing an inventory of envi-
ronmentally sensitive open lands with the coopera-
tion of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program; and
proposing zoning changes for public and private
open land parcels. This plan is intended to integrate
these efforts and provide a framework for decision
making to identify, acquire, and manage open lands
in the Town of Vail.
This Plan identifies existing open lands in and
around Vail and determines the current need for
obtaining land for recreation, conservation, trails and
public use. The plan also identifies and analyzes spe-
cific parcels of land that can meet these needs.
Options for acquisition or protection are also exam-
ined along with management strategies for these
properties.
Acquisition can include outright purchase of proper-
ty, purchase of easements or development rights,
donations, condemnation, etc. Since resources are
limited to obtain open lands, priorities have been
established for recommended actions. These priori-
ties are based on a number of criteria including
demonstrated need, potential threat, opportunities
with specific land owners, etc. Rough costs are
included with the priority actions.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
In the early 1900's, miners began settling along the
Gore Creek to mine silver, lead, and zinc around
Battle Mountain. After the Great Depression sheep
herders came to the valley. In the late 1930's, a state
highway extended into the Gore Creek Valley under
the direction of Highway Engineer Charlie Vail.
During WWII, the 10th Mountain Division trained at
Camp Hale, 20 miles south of the Gore Valley. After
the war, two soldiers that had trained at Camp Hale,
Pete Seibert and Earl Eaton, came back to establish a
ski resort in Vail.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
In 1959, a land use permit was issued to an invest-
ment group that had been formed for the Vail ski
resort. The Vail resort opened on December 15,1962
with 876 acres of skiable terrain making it the third
largest ski resort in the United States. In 1966, the
Town of Vail was incorporated and in 1969
Lionshead was annexed into the Town.
The Vail Town Council has placed a high priority on
identifying and acquiring additional open space
because of the rapid pace of development and the rel-
atively limited number of vacant parcels. The gener-
al public has consistently said through surveys and
public forums that preserving open space is a major
priority for the community.
The Town began to develop a fund to protect open
space when the Town of Vail implemented a 1% Real
Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) in 1980. Funding for the
Real Estate Transfer Tax is summarized in Table 1.
Eight parks have been established with a portion of
this revenue and include athletic fields, an outdoor
amphitheater, ponds, play equipment, paths, and pic-
nic facilities. In addition, a Park Superintendent was
hired to ensure that these parks are well maintained.
Table 1
Real Estate Transfer Tax History and Budget
0
1960
1961 1962 1963
1954
1965
1966
1997
1966
1969
1990
1991
1992
1993
1993
Actual
Actual Actual Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Budyet
Actual
January
63,999
98,089 106,981 119,972
78,053
80,733
101,374
131,916
96,119
309,233
162,954
165,141
88,238
106,440
179,188
February
40,595
e9,018 105,024 132220
86289
170,052
64,906
44,040
109,873
140,192
133,085
71,413
110,960
89280
141,960
March
69,886
126,935 109,533 137,820
62,693
63,831
92,557
38,791
68,104
145,957
77,995
183,698
116,626
89,040
178,032
April
76,855
94,653 65,900 103,526
173,321
90,396
1BZ743
95,554
179,671
151,069
152,027
106,040
213,245
114,240
107,475
May
42.738
84,324 54,663 90,599
96,006
228,673
98,651
120,984
99,736
220299
167,972
96,994
142,817
105,360
189,742
June
62,239
125,433 54,486 140,636
76,467
49,513
79,915
73,509
101,364
122,466
136,364
141,663
138,652
90,720
112,647
July
49,367
186,110 104252 68,539
157,598
88,523
70,441
47,949
126,537
125,675
75,169
132,042
95,373
93,000
168,959
Subtotal
405,679
784,562 600,851 793,314 730,427
771,726
690,587
552,743
781,404
1,214,891
905,566
899,191
906,111
664080 1,078203
August
79,859
115,499 71,282 97,806
58,937
32,860
100,182
61,137
109,315
86,347
77,486
99,820
91,695
78,480
145,035
September
59,800
113,992 49,332 96,746
64,671
48,516
108,167
78,819
116,557
143,306
75,745
85,645
132,330
79,080
195,685
October
108,510
154,000 42,498 122,546
68,732
109,633
93,860
124291
177,360
241,393
118,966
258,974
179,094
124,800
180,475
November
102,623
107,768 81,698 91,385
105,109
74,909
89,047
114,839
241,888
165,964
102,210
268,394
240,933
112,080
176,174
December
142,662
133,867 110,911 56,533
81,890
333,139
106,695
95,495
192,947
192,737
107,880
95,742
441,833
117,480
2OZO04
TOTAL
666,133 1,609,M 656'572 IjM,830 1,129,766
1,37e,783
1,166,536
1AV,M
1,616,471
2,064,669
1x67,973
1]67,766
1,961,966
1,200,000
1,697576
Table 1
Real Estate Transfer Tax History and Budget
0
Town of Vail
CURRENT TRENDS
There are a number of trends that will have an
effect on the future of the Vail Valley, specifically
related to recreation and open space. Vail is largely a
developed island within the White River National
Forest and will increasingly depend on the surround-
ing public lands to provide a variety of recreational
opportunities. Relevant trends that are outlined
briefly in the Northwest Colorado Council of
Governments white paper on environmental trends
effecting Vail include:
• Increase in the number of commuters into
Vail as more workers are moving down val-
ley
• Shift in population base down valley due to
rising property values
• Increase in number of second home proper-
ties within the Town
• An aging population
• More active use and increased recreational
demand on National Forest System lands
(down hill skiing, biking, hunting, hiking,
etc).
• Increase in environmental awareness and
concern for environmental quality and pro-
tection
Another trend effecting the recommendations in the
Plan is the popularity of hiking, biking, skating, etc.,
on linear recreation systems (trails, bikeways, green-
ways) as opposed to recreating solely in developed
parks. This national trend is evidenced in the Vail
Valley through the strong support of new connec-
tions in the trail system and the level of use on the
current system. Vail is positioned to take advantage
of this new focus by improving and extending the
existing trail system, as discussed further as part of
the recommendations of the plan.
® INVENTORY
OPEN AND UNDEVELOPED LANDS
An inventory of open lands within the Town of
Vail was completed in June of 1993. This inven-
tory is displayed on the Existing Open Lands Map
(See Exhibit 1) which shows lands currently zoned
open space and vacant lands not yet developed.
Maps provided by the Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District (VVCWD) were useful in describing
the number and location of developable parcels still
available in the Town of Vail. This information was
then updated using building permit records.
The 1986 Town of Vail Land Use Plan indicated that
12% of the land within the
Town of Vail was subdivided
and undeveloped and 23%
was unplated and undevel- Greenbelt
oped, resulting in a total of Town of Vail
35%, or 1,179 acres not devel- Vail Associates
oped. Parks and zoned open US Forest Service
space accounted for another Corporation
17%, (or 555 acres) of land. individuals
Since 1986, zoned open space
has increased to 952 acres and
the acres of undeveloped
buildable lots has significantly
decreased. Projections from
VVCWD indicate that Vail is
90% built out and that approx-
imately 950 more dwelling
units could be developed.
This includes additional guest
accommodations, multi -family
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
open space for recreation and agriculture. However,
this district does allow for a wide variety of uses
(e.g., churches, schools, single family dwellings) that
are not compatible with an open lands zone district.
In addition, agriculture is no longer a viable land use
in Vail.
The Greenbelt and Natural Open Space (GNOS)
District consists of 326 acres and is the most restric-
tive open space zone district. Development in GNOS
areas is essentially prohibited except for pedestrian
and bicycle paths and golf courses as a conditional
use.
The Town of Vail owns a significant amount of the
zoned open lands within the Town: 621/6 of GNOS
and 75% of AOS lands
(Table 2 - Ownership of
Number of
Parcels
Colo. Dept. of Transportation 2 4.07
Total 21 326.77
Ag. & Open Space
Number of
Parcels
Acres
Town of Vail
36
501.70
Vail Associates
17
57.17
US Forest Service
0
0
Corporation
16
39.4
Individuals
10
53.2
Colo. Dept. of Transportation
0
0
Total
79
651.47
units, duplexes, and single
family units. As of October
1993, there are approximately
270 undeveloped, buildable
lots remaining in the Town of Vail.
Zoned Open Lands in Vail).
Most of the privately
owned lands zoned GNOS
and AOS are on very steep
slopes or have other envi-
ronmental constraints
(e.g., hazard area, flood-
plain, wetland).
At the time the plan was
adopted the Town was
working on the first of a
two phase project to
change open lands zoning
in Vail. Phase One
involved changing the
zoning language in the
GNOS and AOS zone dis-
tricts. These changes
reflect recommendations
Table 2 from the 1991
Ownership of Zoned Open Lands in Vail Development Code
LAND ZONED OPEN SPACE
There are two open space zone districts in Vail;
Agricultural and Open Space (AOS) and Greenbelt
and Natural Open Space (GNOS). There are approxi-
mately 651 acres of AOS zoned land (Table 2). The
primary function of the AOS district is to provide
Revision Report and addi-
tional changes that the Planning and Environmental
Commission and TOV staff have identified. Phase
Two of this project involved making zoning changes
to specific parcels of land.
The TOV staff has proposed changes to the names,
purpose statements, allowed uses, and conditional
uses for both the AOS and GNOS districts. The pro-
posed changes are designed to create a pure "Natural
0
Town of Vail
POTATO PATCH
PMEYLAME
SANDSTONE PARK/ �
RALMAD
TOTLDT \\
LIONS RIDGE --- %
'I STEPHENS PARK
a
DONOVAN
PARK
DONOVAN PARK/
CE►ETARY
- MATTERHORN
P
sic— MEQ,%, 1
1711' y' r•
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
EXISTING OPEN LANDS
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
TOWN OF VAIL VAILMORARO
rr�.
ow Mine
%ti,!`
l
I N
De,o'D;
.�
a
DONOVAN
PARK
DONOVAN PARK/
CE►ETARY
- MATTERHORN
P
sic— MEQ,%, 1
1711' y' r•
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
EXISTING OPEN LANDS
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
TOWN OF VAIL VAILMORARO
rr�.
Exhibit 1
Existing Open Lands
0
%ti,!`
I N
De,o'D;
.�
TV1116
.-
as
EAST VAL
KAT,111S RANCH
IMF
OPEN SPACE
raft ow
GOLFCOURS
a+.y�►Ai�
TENFIS
LEGEND
9:.
IISLLCREJEK/
='
TED KINDELL
TRACTE
..
WILLOW
Iii ��,i►t/
WA�,,
_LINDEVELOPED
PARCELSJQA1I I,
-TOWIIN
OF VAIL PARKS AND OPENW.
4Ya
Exhibit 1
Existing Open Lands
0
Town of Vail
PARKS
Cwacostation b Main GoreCreek Ik
Bighorn Park
7.3
Booth Creek Park
3.0
Bnlehr Park
9
Donovan park
54.0
Ford Park
35.4
Gilden peak
2.5
Gore Creek promenade
3
InbnMn. Pocket park
2
Katsae Ranch
172A
Uorsehmd Ta Ld
.4
Mayors park
2
ME Creekrbd Kkdell
3
Roger Staub Park
2
Sardsbne Park
17.7
Stepharts Park
139
Pirate Ship Park
3-7
Wibw Park
.4
Gol Course
96
PARK FACLMES
d
C
a •
Table 3
Park Facilities
Area Preservation" District (NAP) and a
"Recreational Open Space" (ROS) District. Changes
are recommended to the permitted and conditional
uses in these districts to ensure consistency with their
purpose statements. At the time of this report, the
proposed zoning changes were being reviewed by
the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental
Commission.
Work has begun on Phase Two which involves mak-
ing zoning changes to specific parcels. Site visits
have been made to all AOS, GNOS and PUD (Public
Use) zoned parcels and specific recommendations
have been made for classifying each parcel. Further
action to change parcel zoning will occur after
changes in the zoning language have been approved
OUTDOOR RECREATION INVENTORY
An inventory was completed in June of 1993 of the
current TOV parks. This survey included a
review of recognized parks, open spaces, pedestrian
and bike trails, and National
Forest System trailheads. The
inventory includes park size,
type of play equipment, num-
ber of trails and walkways
through the site, open fields,
immediate surroundings, and
proximity to other recreation
areas, as well as a number of
other features.
• . . In the Town of Vail there are
• • • approximately 313 acres of des -
40 • • ignated parks, not including the
• • Town of Vail public golf course.
• • • The Vail Recreation District and
• the Eagle Valley School District
offer a broad range of pro-
grams, services and facilities,
' many of which take place on
these park lands. Other public
areas which are not considered
formal parks but provide usable
• open space include: the Nature
Center which provides interpre-
tive nature trails and presenta-
tions; the Vail Library which has
stream access and well used
open space; and the publicly
owned portions of the Gore Creek stream tract which
provides access to Gore Creek for fisherman and
other recreational activities.
As a resort community, Vail also has many private
recreational facilities including tennis courts, swim-
ming pools and fitness centers. Although many of
these facilities are primarily for visitor use, they are
often open to the general public. Public recreation
facilities in other communities in the Valley, such as
Eagle -Vail, Avon, Minturn and Edwards, are also
available to Vail residents.
Seventeen parks within the Town were inventoried in
detail(See Table 3.). This inventory indicates that
seven of the parks are open green spaces in an other-
wise developed area, ten have at least one facility (i.e.
a picnic table, tennis court), ten are next to a recog-
nized bike path, seven have playground equipment,
and seven are within a short walking distance of the
Village area. Two of these parks (Pirate Ship Park
and the Lionshead Tot Lot) are on land owned by
Vail Associates.
Vail is surrounded by the White River National
Forest, which provides opportunities for hiking,
horseback riding, and mountain biking directly acces-
sible from the Town. White River National Forest is
approximately 1.9 million acres with over 891,493
acres of protected wilderness areas. In addition, Vail
Mountain located to the south of Town on NFS prop-
erty, provides over 3,800 skiable acres in the winter
and a network of hiking and cycling trails in the
summer.
Approx.
Nam. nil Trail Tree c..r......v. I.a A
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
TRAILS INVENTORY
Vail completed a Recreation Trails Master Plan in
1988 that identified trail users and their needs,
and included deficiencies with the current trails sys-
tem. A major recommendation in this plan was to
obtain additional lands to interconnect existing trails
and to create new trails. Eighteen existing trails were
inventoried for their trail length, what the trail con-
nects, type of trail, surfacing, description of signs,
and general condition (See Table 4).
Not included in this survey is the Vail Pass recreation
trail. This is a paved trail, primarily used for cycling
that extends from East Vail over Vail Pass and down
to Frisco and Breckenridge. Eagle County has
recently completed a bicycle master plan which sug-
gests extending a cycling trail from Vail to the west to
Type ofTrall
Comments fll.t A
Frontege Road South
Cwacostation b Main GoreCreek Ik
2 miles
1.11
Is
North Homage Road
Seteway parking bi b Red Sand.
1.7 ries
From Per east of the post office until just east of Bhiehr C eek Parr the tial becomes a bile lane adjacent b the skeet
siomElemernWNSchool
•
•
•
Make Biaa Path
Donovan Park b Lbary
2.8 miles
•
•
South Fromage Rd.
Rec. path oonneclon • South
.3 mules
The path changes from a bile lane on oad (West) b a arc. hal (East) at Forest Road
Fronlege b on West Lahead C k
'
' '
•
Cid Highymy en3ii;hom Rd.
East end of Bkjam Rd. and beginning
.6 mos
Fobs old Highway 6 - very little whbular traRc
of the Wil Pass bibs pato
•
•
•
Forest Road
South Frontage b Rec. Plan Tral
2 mise
•
•
•
Dobson Assn
Dobson and Neat Meadow Drhe
250
Exclusively ble and ped traffic except for accessional buses There is a eonficl between pedestrians, roletlsde s, arod
birses.
•
.
•
West Meadow Drive
pec. Phn path and Val Read
25 miles
Athagh not signed. this e a major Hoots for slit tips of uratic
•
•
•
Frok" Fisted South
4 -way sop st Fronage and Val
.3 miss
Road b Wil Valu Drive
•
•
Dowabwel Rrdeehlsn Ares
WA
WA
Need to deWmne leasbily of lghtN on streanmrek between Nestn and
Lbesheed.
•
•
Gore Creek Sbeamwak
Ford Pada b Covered Bridge 8 Wary
2.5 miles
lo VANtin
Main Ford Park Tei
Tennis CenaedPaddng lot b
9
There Is a shod ads tai ria b Wil Valey Dr. - paved; apporc 2 miles; The short tal also leads to nature tams at
Couasd Bridge
I southern aide c pads
•
•
Wil Wary Drive
East Wil p.HdN stmdua to W.
2 muss
- Sunburst Drive
end of Katsce Ranch Thai
Needs paved shoulder for bikng b aduoe oongestbn and oonllc beareen cy-fift padeslra s, and oem
•
•
•
Val Tal
God Raaklenne awe b gol
.5 mine
ckbhouse
This ial is a %onciaful natural tai that ws created for local mma.
•
•
Assn D.aw - Asps Court
Fronlsga Road and Katsos Ranch
2 miss
40
Tal
Kabos Ranch Tal
Easy Wo Meohange o Sunburst
22 miles
Drive at BridgeStrwt
Wtnbr acMees nol de siagh rides and -trysiding
•
•
Bighorn Rd.
East Wil immo anlpb Man Gore
19 min
Drha
Beginning d bat at W. end Is gravel br about VI O mile then tsoans paned. E end is oonneded to Man Goa
•
•
•
Man care Drka - Jun(oer Dare
Bob ends are on fthom Drive
1 S mus
Duped d the rac. plsn tale. W. end oonnxb b Bridge SL -the beginning d the Kabos Ranch Tai
- staeamside Cade hast
•
•
16 miles
Table 4
Existing Trail Facilities
0
Town of Vail
V.A. Hiking Trails
V.A. Biking Trails
NFS Trails
Name
Length
Name
Length
Name
Length
Berry Picker
4.6 miles
Upper Fireweed
1.2 miles
Two Elk Trail
11 miles
Gore Range Loop
1.1 miles
Lightning Lookout
1.2 miles nt
Pitkin Creek Trail
5 miles
Ridge Route
2.8 miles
Village Trail
6 miles
Bighorn Trail
3.6 miles
Kinnickinnick
2 miles
Blackjack Loop
2.4 miles r.L
Booth Creek Trail
6 miles
Lower Fireweed
1 mile
Kloser's Klimb
2.4 miles
Deluge Creek Trail
4 miles
Ptarmigan Loop
1.2 miles
Lion Down
5.5 miles
Vail Pass Trail (biking/hiking)
30 miles
Sunlight
1.5 miles
Grand Traverse
9 miles
Buffehr Creek Trail
2.5 miles
Eagle View
4 miles
World Cup Race Course
11 miles
Spraddle Creek Trail
3.5 miles
Davos Trail
2.5 miles
TOTAL
18.2 miles
I TOTAL
38.7 miles
I TOTAL
68.1 miles
Table 5
Existing V.A. and NFS Trail s
connect with the Glenwood Canyon recreation trail.
A major hurdle to this plan has been creating a trail
through Dowd junction. In 1992, the Town secured
partial funding from the Colorado Department of
Transportation and using budgeted funds, the Town
of Vail proposes to build a trail through Dowd
junction and across the Eagle River to connect to
Highway 6&24 west of the Minturn interchange. Both
V.A. and the U.S.F.S. provide an extensive network of
trails (Table 5). Together, there are 122 miles of trails
provided by V.A. and the U.S.F.S that are accessible
from Vail. Vail Associates is in the process of prepar-
ing a mountain bike master plan for Vail Mountain.
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LAND
Town staff initially identified 50 vacant parcels
throughout Vail that have significant environ-
mental constraints for development. These con-
straints range from snow avalanche, rock fall, or
debris flow hazards to floodplain and wetland condi
tions. Forty eight of these parcels are zoned
Greenbelt Natural Open Space or Agricultural Open
Space.
The Town has prepared hazard maps which indicate
these conditions on aerial photographs. In addition,
riparian areas and sensitive natural habitat have been
identified and mapped. Both riparian areas and sen-
sitive natural habitat were identified in the summer
of 1993 by biologists working for Colorado State
University and the Colorado Natural Heritage
Program.
The Colorado Natural Heritage Program used
infrared aerial photographs and field surveys to iden-
tify sensitive natural areas that have national, region-
al or local significance. These areas have been com-
bined with the hazard maps, resulting in a composite
Hazards and Sensitive Areas Map ( Exhibit 2).
The Colorado Natural Heritage Program is a non -reg-
ulatory, technical support organization affiliated with
the Nature Conservancy. In addition to conducting
biological surveys it provides a national database of
endangered and threatened species which all Federal
land management agencies rely on.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND PUBLIC
INPUT PROCESS
PRIORITIES FOR RECREATION AND OPEN
SPACE
everal public and Open Lands Committee meet-
ings were held in order to assess current recre-
ation and open space needs and trends in Vail. In
addition to these public meetings, an analysis was
conducted that studied past planning documents and
surveys and their recommendations for recreation
and open space. Both the public meetings for the
plan and an analysis of previous plans (Table 6) have
indicated that the priorities are to:
1. Preserve open space
2. Improve the pedestrian and bike system
3. Provide additional recreation facilities
PRESERVE OPEN SPACE
There was strong public consensus that the num-
ber one priority for open space acquisition is to
protect natural open space and preserve the "moun-
tain experience". People felt that acquiring or pro-
tecting natural open space was critical in maintaining
the natural character of the Vail Valley. The public
felt that protecting the natural open character of the
area was more important than developing active out-
door recreational opportunities and was needed to
protect water quality and natural habitat. Over half
of the top 20 priorities from the first public meeting
relate directly to the issue.of protecting natural open
space
IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE
SYSTEM
The second priority includes improving the pedes-
trian and bike path system. Several previous
plans and studies concluded that there is a need to
improve and extend the pedestrian path system in
order to access and connect green spaces throughout
the core area. This has resulted in the Streetscape
Master Plan, Vail Village Master Plan, and Master
Transportation Plan which are in the process of being
implemented.
Encouraging stream access by creating a continuous
stream walk along Gore Creek and connecting it with
the existing parks, open space and pedestrian path
F, r t
Town of Vail
INTERMOUNTAIN
POCKET PARK
BUFFEHR
CREEK
PARK
VAIL HEIGHTS
VAR OAS
SCHCMIE
POTATO PATCH
SANDSTONE PARK/
TOTLOT
LIONS RWGE
r -
� � a
INTERMOUNTAIN
SOURCEOF DATA: Tows of Vad Hward Maps
CoWado Nallaral Hatage Program
CSU Rqulara MWPay
Exhibit 2
Hazards and Sensitive Areas Map
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
HAZARD AND SENSFrrVE AREA MAP
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
TOM OF VAL VAI,_COLOPADO
AJ
BIGHORN PARI(
0
MODERATELY SaemvEAlEAa
1
FLOODPLAN/ IiARIAM VEGETATION
RIPARIAN VEGETATION OUT OF TIE FLOODPLAN
BIGHORN PARI(
0
Town of Vail
systems is a stated objective in the Vail Land Use
Plan, the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Recreation
Trails Master Plan, and the Vail Transportation Plan.
The Vail Land Use Plan states that, "The stream tract
extends from Ford Park in the East to Forest Road in
the West and consists of a series of dedicated parcels
as development progressed within the Town. The
area serves as an invaluable environmental and aes-
thetic component to the Village Core. The primary
uses in this area are linear open space and recreation-
al paths." The Vail Recreation Trails Master Plan con-
firms this by summarizing that "the best opportunity
for a new trail is along Gore Creek from the
Lionshead base to Ford Park." Citizens did express
concern that the stream walk be developed in a sensi-
tive manner so that the natural beauty of the corridor
is preserved, that impacts to adjacent uses and prop-
erties are minimized and that the use of the environ-
mentally oriented trail be restricted to pedestrians
only.
On November 9,1993 the pros and cons of the pro-
posed streamwalk were discussed at a Vail Town
Council meeting. It was decided by the Town
Council at that meeting, that instead of a
streamwalk, the Town would identify stream access
areas along Gore Creek and inform the public of
these access areas. Also making improvements to
West Meadow Drive to separate pedestrians from
cyclists and cars was identified as a priority.
Separation of uses on the trail systems is an impor-
tant objective in many of these same plans. The Vail
Recreation Trails Master Plan suggests the implemen-
tation of a three level trails plan that would separate
and extend trail routes into commuter cycling routes,
multiple use trails, and pedestrian only trails. This
concept is appropriate for Vail's physical linearity
and provides a logical hierarchy for the circulation
system. Frequently mentioned recommendations for
improvements to the bike trail system include adding
bike lanes on the frontage roads throughout the
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
entire Town, extending the bike path system through
Dowd junction and completing critical links to the
trail system through the most developed parts of
Town and to NFS trailheads.
Augmenting the Town's and V.A.'s existing sign pro-
gram for all of the trails and trailheads was viewed
as a critical component to the system. Specifically,
additional signs or kiosks are needed to direct people
to USFS and Vail Associates trails. These kiosks
would identify alternatives to hiking in wilderness
areas that are being impacted by heavy use.
Improved signs are also needed in East Vail to indi-
cate recreational trails along Town roads. Signs
should be reviewed where multi -modal conflicts are
common. Additional pocket parks or natural areas
were seen as needed for both the west and east ends
of Town. These could also serve as "rest stops" along
the interconnected trail system surrounding the
Town.
Table 6
Assessment of Previous Plans/Documents
0
z
U
C
•
4
0
O
0
0
E
5 =
3
o
o
•
�n
� �
c •
a • �
m
!
�
LL a
of i
�
•
Z
2
�
y
i
p
• �
J}�
IA•
q
•
Y C
7
•
« •
C
¢
i�jt
E
E
O
sq
3•
t�
S
o
i
•
•
1
4
F
L
E
d
<
E
.2 v
=
E
LL
.
ac
C
O
i
S
m
o
i
E t
•
s�
4
c
�° $
$
0
E
I4�
'� 6
x�
d
0
0
V c
•
F-
t
i
�c
E
�$
t
•
LU
e
E
i
E
n
o
2
a
o 3
if
U
E E0,
M
Background Documents
VAIL TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
TOV 5TREEISCAPE MASTER PLAN
•
•
•
•
EAGLE CTY. REG. PARK FACILITES/ACTMTTES STUDY
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
AVON RECREATION MASTER PLAN
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PAIL METRO. REC. DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
TOW RECREATION TRAILS MASTER PLAN REPORT
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PARKS i RBC. EAGLE COUNTY,ACTKNI PLAN
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
TOWN OF PAIL LAND USE PLAN
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
TOWN OF PAIL SPEAK UP MEETVIGS
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
TOV COMMUNITY SURVEY
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
TOTALS
7
9
6
4 5ts
3
2
1 1
1
6
7
4
3
4
7
6
5
3 1
1 1
1
2 2
1 2
2
1
4
4
3 1
1
Table 6
Assessment of Previous Plans/Documents
0
Town of Vail
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RECREATION
FACILITIES
There was concern voiced that open space and
recreational opportunities are less available at
either end of Town (particularly in West Vail North
of I-70) and that improvements should be investigat-
ed. This lack of facilities is supported by an analysis
of the National Recreation and Park Standards.
While an overall analysis shows that the Town of
Vail far exceeds national standards, there are some
access deficiencies in the system due to Vail's lineari-
ty and Interstate 70 splitting the valley. The recom-
mended solution is to improve, complete, and extend
the bike and pedestrian trail system. Additionally,
West Vail, on the north side of the Interstate, could
utilize an additional small "pocket park" to meet this
need. In East Vail, the Water Tank site could pro-
vide an additional picnic area in the S.E. corner of
Town as well as a new summer/fall trailhead.
The third priority also includes supporting recre-
ational activities on a regional scale, including a
swimming pool, recreation center, and additional
athletic fields. Many of these items could be accom-
modated at the Berry Creek property in Edwards, at
the new softball complex in Eagle, and at the pro-
posed recreation center in Avon.
U.S. FOREST SERVICE, VAIL ASSOCIATES,
AND VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT
INTERESTS
pecific discussions with the U.S. Forest Service,
ail Associates and the Vail Recreation District
support the general concepts of this plan. The U.S.
Forest Service is interested in reducing recreational
impacts on the trails that lead into the Eagles Nest
Wilderness Area on the north side of Town, which
can be accomplished by improving the trail system
and trailhead parking in and around the Town. This
would include improved bike access to the existing
trailheads with bike parking and other improvements
made to the trailheads. No new trails in or near the
Wilderness Area are favored by the U.S. Forest
Service. The U.S. Forest Service is also concerned
that public access to National Forest System lands
continue at existing trailhead locations. There are
several right-of-way issues that need to be addressed
to guarantee continued public access. Vail Associates
is also interested in an improved trail system and
making better connections between the Town and
Vail Mountain by improving both trails and signs.
PUBLIC FACILITIES/ LAND RESERVE
One of the objectives of the Comprehensive Open
Lands planning process is to identify, to the
extent possible, future public needs (or needs not cur-
rently being met) that will require land. The 1986
Vail Land Use Plan discusses this issue in detail. The
intent here is to update that work and make recom-
mendations for specific parcels of land that may be
desired for public use. As previously mentioned,
funding for land reserve parcels acquired for public
use would not come from RETT funds. In order to
update information regarding community needs,
interviews were conducted with representatives from
the Town of Vail Public Works Department,
Community Development, Fire Department, Police
Department, Eagle Valley Schools, the Vail Housing
Authority, and the Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated
Water and Sanitation District.
The following issues and needs resulted from these
interviews:
Vail Public Works Department
The Public Works Department will need to
expand their current facility located on the
north side of Interstate 70. Currently, the
Vail Associates' owned parcel of land imme-
diately west of their existing facility is leased
as a snow storage area and is the logical
place for expansion. Additionally, a West
Vail snow plow and cinder storage site has
long been on their needs list.
2. Vail Fire Department
Over 10 years ago, the Vail Fire Department
identified a need for a West Vail Fire Station.
Response times from their main facility in the
Village to West Vail are inadequate and con-
tinued growth has only exacerbated this
problem. Because this is a health/ safety
issue, finding an acceptable site has received
a high priority in the development of recom-
mendations for the Public Facilities/ Land
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Reserve portion of the Comprehensive Open
Lands Plan.
3. Vail Police Department
The Police Department is in the process of
expanding their current facility. The only
need they have that is not covered in this
expansion is an outdoor shooting range for
recertification of officers and for "maneu-
vers" practice. However, this need may be
accommodated at a proposed shooting range
in Wolcott.
4. Eagle Valley School District
The only Eagle Valley School facility in the
Town of Vail is the Red Sandstone School.
The District envisions utilizing this facility
for the foreseeable future. They would like
more play areas near the school but realize
that the topography is very constraining.
5. Unser Eaele Vallev Consolidated Water and
Sanitation District
The Sanitation District's needs mainly
involve easements through several properties
for either additional water tanks or new
diversion structures. These needs have been
discussed in this Plan. The District intends
to construct a new intake and diversion sys-
tem upstream from the runaway truck ramp
on Interstate 70 to ensure a clean water sup-
ply. Although, the Town does not need to
take any direct action, it does need to be
aware of these needs and work with the
District to develop a utility easement.
6. Vail Housing Authority/ Community
Development Department
The Vail Housing Authority is interested in
"employee" housing projects on the
Mountain Bell Site and at Vail Commons.
The Housing Authority believes that any
higher density project, if located within the
Town, should be in close proximity to either
the core area or the West Vail commercial
area or have good transportation access.
0
Town of Vail
®CONCEPT PLAN
The Concept Plan provides the framework from
which specific actions are recommended in the
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. The Concept Plan
describes in general terms key protection areas, key
activity areas, and critical connections between them.
The recurring theme of preservation of natural open
space and trail connections is diagrammed in a con-
ceptual format (Exhibit 3).
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS
The National Forest System lands surrounding the
Town (both forested and open) are a significant
amenity for the Town as a recreational, environmen-
tal, and visual resource. Portions of the natural sys-
tems extend into Town, shown in green stripes on the
diagram and are important to protect. In many cases,
these lands contain steep slopes or have high hazard
potential, such as for snow avalanches and rockfalls.
These lands should not be developed.
The Gore Creek Corridor is the other significant nat-
ural
atural resource enjoyed by the Town. Running
through the middle of Town, Gore Creek is an impor-
tant wildlife corridor, riparian and wetland resource,
and recreation amenity. Protection of the Creek is
extremely important as well as allowing public access
to the stream corridor.
ACTIVITY CENTERS AND CONNECTIONS
The other component to the diagram describes a
series of "activity centers' shown as asterisks and
connections indicated by different types of lines.
These centers are activity areas where people are like-
ly to gather or choose as a destination. Included in
these centers are retail areas such as the Vail Village
Core, Lionshead, and the West Vail commercial
areas; bus stops; and parks and open spaces such as
Katsos Ranch, Ford Park, Pirate Ship Park, and
Bighorn Park. The connections then tie all of these
centers together through a series of bicycle and
pedestrian trails that strive to separate uses where -
ever possible and provide a high quality recreation
and travel experience. Activity areas could include
interpretive/ informational centers, sitting areas, or
even play equipment.
The linking together of activity centers through the
hierarchy of trails provides residents and visitors
with multiple non -vehicular options for reaching des-
tinations, for recreation, enjoyment of the natural
environment or commuting purposes. These connec-
tions include bike lanes on the frontage road, an
improved bike path system, walking paths adjacent
to the bike path, stream access, and a new south and
north trail system that almost entirely encircles the
Town.
®ACTION PLAN
The Action Plan is intended to be a framework for
obtaining or protecting open lands as well as cre-
ating trail linkages in a logical and comprehensive
manner. Parcels included in the plan were selected
because they serve to meet the overall needs and
vision for protecting or acquiring open lands,as well
as lands for public use, trails and parks. The plan
illustrates the intended use for each "Action Parcel"
including public facility (e.g. fire station), open space
(including trails), or park. It also illustrates the lands
that will either be acquired from or traded to the U.S.
Forest Service as part of the Land Ownership
Adjustment Plan (LOA) (described in more detail in
Appendix 1) .
In conjunction with the Action Plan, a series of Tables
describe the potential protection techniques, manage-
ment system and open space or public objective for
each parcel (see Tables 8 and 9).
PROTECTION TECHNIOUES
There are a variety of techniques available to pro-
tect land. These techniques vary in both cost and
result. Techniques have been recommended for each
action parcel. A description of these techniques fol-
lows:
TOV Acquire -Fee
The traditional method of land acquisition is to
acquire the full fee interest at fair market value. The
property could be acquired through a cash purchase
or over time according to a term or installment pur-
chase. If a public entity acquires land with terms, it
can pay interest, which is tax exempt, and thereby
lower the purchase price of the property. In addition,
there are many ways to structure a term or install -
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
ment purchase which meet landowner estate or tax
objectives, which can extend the term of purchase.
This capability to flexibly structure a fee acquisition
can meet the Town's objectives of creatively leverag-
ing its limited resources. It can also meet the
landowners financial and tax planning objectives,
resulting in effectively lowering land costs to the
TOV. The acquisition of the full fee interest by the
TOV will remove the land from the tax rolls and
require that the TOV provide for the upkeep, mainte-
nance and security of the property.
TOV Acquire - Tax Lien
For those properties where owners are delinquent in
paying property taxes the Town has the option of
acquiring the tax certificates of paying the back taxes
to acquire the property. In most instances, the acqui-
sition of property by acquiring the tax certificate
results in substantial savings over the price previous
owners have paid for the property. In Vail, most of
these properties are steep or inaccessible (with limit-
ed development capability) which has limited the
owners ability to develop or sell. This is a very cost
effective way for the Town to acquire property and
ensure that it is not built upon at a later date.
U.S. Forest Service Acquire - Fee
According to the Land Ownership Adjustment (LOA)
Plan developed by the Town and the U.S. Forest
Service, a number of properties will change hands in
order to create the common boundary both desire.
The U.S. Forest Service will acquire the fee to these
lands generally through a land trade since acquisition
dollars are scarce.
Land Trade
In order for the Town and the U.S. Forest Service to
develop the common boundary defined by the LOA
plan, they will need to trade a number of properties.
Land trades are voluntarily entered into and can be
made when properties appraised at or near the same
value are traded between jurisdictions. While land
trades are a desirable way to change ownerships,
they generally take from two to five years to con-
clude and may involve a number of complicated
appraisal issues.
0
Town of Vail Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Davos Trail
frj
z
Natidtial Forest System
P
v
'L7 • a 1
• � a
o
National. Porest System
Vail Mountain
y
Booth Creek Trail
�... .•_ _ r Narth'Frall'
National Forest System
�foam
w
Vail Trail S
National Forest System
Exhibit 3
Concept Plan
Trail
l
0
Town of Vail
Obtain Development Rights
Land consists of a 'bundle" of rights which the owner
acquires when a property is purchased. For instance,
water and mineral rights allow the owner to use
those water and mineral resources attached to the
land and identified in a property's deed. The value
of development rights is based on the right to devel-
op a certain number of units on a property estab-
lished by a combination of zoning and market condi-
tions. Protection of a property can be accomplished
by acquiring all or a portion of the development
rights while the landowner retains the open land or
those development rights specified to remain with
the land. The value of the development rights is
determined by an appraisal which values the land in
two ways. First the land is appraised at its fair mar-
ket value and second, it is appraised with the devel-
opment rights removed. The value of the develop-
ment rights is the difference between the fair market
value and the "restricted" value.
The Town can either purchase the development
rights or if the owner is willing, acquire them by gift
with the landowner obtaining the tax benefits of a
charitable donation. These tax benefits relate to
income and estate taxes and may well influence prop-
erty taxes. The donation of development rights can
be made to either the Town or to a qualified nonprof-
it land trust such as the Nature Conservancy or
Colorado Open Lands. The benefit of the develop-
ment rights transfer is that it is a flexible instrument
which can be tailored to the desires of the landowner
and the Town. The benefit to the Town of acquiring
the development rights is that they cost less than full
fee acquisition and also that the land stays on the tax
rolls and continues to be managed by the landowner.
A conservation easement is another term which is
often applied to the acquisition or donation of devel-
opment rights. The conservation easement is a legal
restriction on a property which is designed to protect
certain natural and scenic qualities of the land, while
at the same time allowing the property owner to
retain ownership and voting rights in a homeowners
association.
Easements
As used in this plan, easements generally refer to an
agreement for use of a property for certain uses
which the land owner either donates or sells to the
Town. For example, a trail easement is an agreement
to permit the Town to utilize a certain width (right-
of-way) for the construction of a pedestrian or bike
trail. The Town would also assume the responsibility
for maintenance, safety, and liability. The value of
the easement is determined by an appraisal of the
property with and without the easement, much as the
valuation of development rights is determined.
Public Use Agreement
As used in this plan, a public use agreement is a con-
tract negotiated between the Town and the property
owner in lieu of obtaining easements to allow public
access. A public use agreement would involve a con-
tract that would enable the Town to make improve-
ments to private property (i.e. a trail). This agree-
ment could allow the private property owner to relo-
cate improvements, at the owners expense, to a
mutually agreeable location on the property.
Maintenance of any facilities would be negotiated as
a part of the agreement.
Donation
The Town can obtain land or development rights
through donation. The benefit to the landowner may
be that the donation of a highly appreciated property
to the Town can create significant tax benefits for the
landowner. These benefits relate to income and
estate taxes primarily. Many communities and land
trusts acquire land and development rights through
gifts which are structured to provide landowners
with tax benefits.
Bargain Sale
A bargain sale is a combination gift and sale of land
or development rights. The bargain sale works when
a landowner is charitably inclined, but cannot afford
to make a contribution of the entire value of a proper-
ty. In this case, the landowner may sell the property
to the Town at less than fair market value, say 50% of
the value, and gift the remaining 50% of value to the
Town. As a result, the landowner receives the benefit
of the cash sale plus the charitable donation of the
balance of the value. Bargain sales can be advanta-
geous where the landowner is charitably inclined and
where there are tax or estate issues which make the
transaction favorable.
Condemnation
Condemnation can be utilized by government when
a landowner refuses to sell a parcel of property to a
government which needs the land to meet estab-
lished public objectives, such as the creation of a
road, park, or transit line. The governmental entity
must pay the landowner fair market value for the
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
property which is determined by an appraisal
process. Condemnation or the threat of condemna-
tion can provide a landowner with certain tax bene-
fits which a normal real estate transaction would not
enjoy. Condemnation is used only in very limited
circumstances when a landowner is unwilling to
negotiate.
PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Evaluation criteria used to prioritize actions
toward achieving the goals outlined in the
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan were derived from
input from the public, the Open Lands Steering
Committee, previous planning studies and analysis,
interviews with the U.S. Forest Service, the Water
and Sanitation District, Fire, Public Works, and Police
Departments and Vail Associates.
A two-tiered evaluation process was conducted that
looked first at whether the action/ parcel meets the
needs of the Town, its' citizens, visitors, and achieves
the goals of the plan. The second level criteria
include the availability of the land or the pressures
for development of the parcel of land. Lands intend-
ed for future public use were also prioritized in terms
of public need and health and safety issues, but are
separated from the natural and recreation systems
because RETT funds will not be used for land reserve
acquisitions.
The Level One Evaluation (Meeting Needs) looked
at four areas of community need relating to the nat-
ural resource system, the recreation system, trails
system, and reserving lands for future civic/public
uses.
Natural Resource Areas (All parcels meeting these
criteria are a high priority)
• Riparian areas
• Sensitive natural areas
• Hazard areas
Recreation/ Parks
• Potential/ need for pocket park/ nature area
• Recreational opportunity for East and West
Vail
Recreational opportunity for community
0
Town of Vail
Trails
• Interconnection with VA and USFS trails
• Separation of trail uses (bikes, pedestrians,
etc)
• Alleviate pressure on wilderness area
• Complete critical connections on existing sys-
tem
Civic/ Public Use
• Public health/ safety
• Meet key public objective
Level Two Evaluation - (Availability)
• Threat of development or irreversible dam-
age
• Opportunities to leverage other funds
•. Cost
• Unusual opportunity with motivated seller
• Opportunity for trade with U.S.F.S.
• Low Management requirements on Town
• Low Liability to Town
ACTION
PARCELS
Priority
Natural System
1, 6,29-32,36,38,
40-47,51
1
South Trail
23-25, 38, 41, 42, 44-47, 51
2
North Trail
1, 2, 3, 4, 15, 2s
3
Stream Access
120, 21, 22, Chapel
4
Bike Lane
19,10
5
Table 7
Priority Actions
Table 7 summarizes how the major concepts and
their associated parcels met the above stated criteria.
Each open lands parcel was evaluated against both
the level 1 and 2 criteria. It is important to note that a
systems approach was used to evaluate and rank
actions. This approach, rather than an incremental
look at each individual parcel out of context with the
other parcels or concept plan, resulted in groups of
actions or solutions that will meet the needs and
objectives described earlier in this report in order to
create an open lands system.
There are three priority actions discussed in this plan
which include:
High Priority: Meets level one and two
criteria and are discussed in detail in
the next section.
Medium Priority: Meets level 1 criteria but
there is no threat of loss due to develop
ment.
Low Priority: Open lands that do not directly
meet high priority needs and are not under
threat of development.
RESULTING TOP FIVE PRIORITIES
The highest priority described at each public meet-
ing related to the protection of Natural System
Lands. These lands have received the highest rank-
ing due to their sensitivity either as habitat, hazard
areas, or riparian vegetation. Thus, the Natural
System Parcels are priority 1.
Following this, there are three trail system actions
that stand out in the priority analysis. These include,
in order of priority: the South Trail (Vail Trail exten-
sion and associated trailheads); development of a
North Trail; improving stream access; and bike lanes
on the frontage roads and shoulders on Vail Valley
Drive.
These five priority areas have been analyzed with
respect to relative expense, projected income from
RETT funding, and a proposed phased approach to
implementing these actions. (Table 10 - Six Year
Plan).
The South Trail received priority 2 primarily because
it simultaneously meets several needs including;
more recreational opportunities in and near the core,
separation of uses on the trail system (specifically
separating pedestrians and bicyclist on the bike path
to and through Katsos Ranch, and provides opportu-
nities for a pocket park/ nature area at one of the
"trailheads" in East Vail . Additionally, the U.S.
Forest Service believes that the South Trail will help
reduce pressure on the Eagles Nest Wilderness Area
by providing an alternative, high quality alpine trail
system in close proximity to the Town.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
The North Trail, priority 3 can meet the needs of the
West Vail community through trailhead/ nature
areas much like the South Trail will for East Vail.
While this trail does not directly connect to the core,
it will provide additional recreation opportunities for
a significant number of people who reside on the
north side of the Interstate.
Stream access is still a priority, even though a formal
trail is not proposed and has received a priority 4.
Improving the bike system throughout Town
received priority 5 and will result in much better sep-
aration of recreational uses on the entire trail system.
Additionally, community or public use parcels/
actions were analyzed separately and prioritized
according to the criteria mentioned above. This
analysis resulted in the West Vail Fire Station as the
highest priority for public use, and the easements
needed for the Vail Valley Water and Sanitation
District to ensure clean water for the Town of Vail.
Another high priority action is acquisition of the
snow dump parcel west of the Public Works shops.
All other public use actions fall below these two pri-
orities. Any actions related to these public use items
will not be funded through RETT funds which are
strictly allocated to open space and recreation related
activities.
0
Town of Vail
Draft Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
PRIORITY PL4N
Comprehensive Oven Lands Plan
TOWN OF VAIL VAIL,COLORADO
POTATO PATCH
n Y LAKE
'JOS Y:hE FA'��., -r•T. BOOTH FALLS
LION'S RIDGE 71
E CRE SPNADD B F M DLL CWW _
N
--� r fes". _
S'�
NA -
i ",\ . � ��'*/ ,4 � .... � ' T 1
0 5 ' TNAIIfAD
xu EAS?NAIL
rr r
.._ _. t-
, K
y
` LIONSHEAD
a: 1 � vA� N 1
w' ;r �
1 r
VAiL HEIGHT.,
YA`L DAS VAIL LLAGE �O�
HEIGHTS
yy
SS..HOHE
f� j V'
-71
1. � y�- .�. \' J� \ '1 - .. ■ �'.
VAIL RIDGE -- _/ \\ rF,�. 4 i t ata •„y'�a`
\
or
g.
s LEGEND>
9Ci1pM PAtR
iT roKwN f MATTERHORN - f ? g C� �o � f �. \•� TxnuE.o
SENSITIVE AND HAZARD PARCELS �\y
SOUTH TRAIL PARCELS 1 ! w
yy ; ALL PARCELS ARE HAZARD PARCELS EXCEPT 57 \'
t).;
A
\ NORTH TRAIL PARCELS TPALHM
�T:R -
.°< �; •y ^, �. \, . STREAM ACCESS PARCELS
EXISTING BIKE PATH
------.- fNTER9lOUNTAiN �
PROPOSED BIKE UNE
EXISTING HIKING TRAIL
PROPOSED HIKING TRAIL
Exhibit 4 HIGH PRIORITY PARCELS NUMBERS
Priority Plan TRAILHEAD
Town of Vail
Comvrehensive List of Recommended Actions
The following describes in more detail the actions
recommended for each parcel. Parcels that are a
high priority are highlighted in bold and have an
asterisk.
* Parcel 1: Trappers Run, Lots 16,19, 21
High priority: Identified as a sensitive habitat area
by Colorado Natural Heritage 1993 survey.
Proposed use - open space, trailhead, nature area, tot
lot, National Forest System access. Portions or all of
this parcel could be traded to the U.S.F.S. if acquired.
* Parcel 2: Unplated Parcel north of Vail Ridge
High priority: Acquire land (via tax lien) and trade to
the U.S. Forest Service to simplify boundary between
TOV and U.S.F.S.. Proposed use - forest land.
* Parcel 6: Intermountain, Lot 14.2724 Snowberry
Dr.
High priority; Acquisition of development rights to
protect steep slopes and mature coniferous trees.
Moderate to high threat of development.
* Parcel 3: Unvlated Parcel north of Vail Das
Schone
High priority: Town confirm ownership and trade
to U.S. Forest Service to simplify Town boundary.
North Trail will also go through parcel.
* Parcel 4: Unplated Parcel North of Vail Heights
High Priority: Town confirm ownership and trade to
U.S. Forest Service to simplify Town boundary.
North Trail will also go through parcel.
* Parcel 5: Hud Wirth Property, Tract D
High Priority: Town acquire (not with RETT funds)
and use for possible West Vail Fire Station and/or
locals housing and/or employee housing.
Parcel 7: Lot 35, Buffer Creek
Medium priority: TOV acquire for expansion of
Buffer Creek Park.
* Parcel 8. Lot 34, Buffer Creek
High priority: TOV acquire for expansion of Buffer
Creek Park. Would protect riparian area on Buffer
Creek. If unable to acquire, then obtain conservation
easement for riparian area and trail easement.
*Parcel 9: Lot 1, Vail Village West, Filing #2
High priority: TOV acquire tax lien to protect
drainage and provide access to Gore Creek. This
parcel has added value for future Frontage Road bike
lanes.
* Parcel 10: Lot 2, Vail Village West, Filing #2
High priority: TOV acquire to maintain access to
Gore Creek. This parcel has added value for future
frontage road bike lanes.
Parcel 11: Cascade Village Tennis Parcel
Low Priority: Town acquire upper bench of parcel
adjacent to Donovan Park. This action does not
include Cascade Club Tennis Courts.
$
0
* Parcel 3: Unvlated Parcel north of Vail Das
Schone
High priority: Town confirm ownership and trade
to U.S. Forest Service to simplify Town boundary.
North Trail will also go through parcel.
* Parcel 4: Unplated Parcel North of Vail Heights
High Priority: Town confirm ownership and trade to
U.S. Forest Service to simplify Town boundary.
North Trail will also go through parcel.
* Parcel 5: Hud Wirth Property, Tract D
High Priority: Town acquire (not with RETT funds)
and use for possible West Vail Fire Station and/or
locals housing and/or employee housing.
Parcel 7: Lot 35, Buffer Creek
Medium priority: TOV acquire for expansion of
Buffer Creek Park.
* Parcel 8. Lot 34, Buffer Creek
High priority: TOV acquire for expansion of Buffer
Creek Park. Would protect riparian area on Buffer
Creek. If unable to acquire, then obtain conservation
easement for riparian area and trail easement.
*Parcel 9: Lot 1, Vail Village West, Filing #2
High priority: TOV acquire tax lien to protect
drainage and provide access to Gore Creek. This
parcel has added value for future Frontage Road bike
lanes.
* Parcel 10: Lot 2, Vail Village West, Filing #2
High priority: TOV acquire to maintain access to
Gore Creek. This parcel has added value for future
frontage road bike lanes.
Parcel 11: Cascade Village Tennis Parcel
Low Priority: Town acquire upper bench of parcel
adjacent to Donovan Park. This action does not
include Cascade Club Tennis Courts.
* Parcel 12: Tract A, Lionsridge, Filing #4
High priority: TOV acquire trail easement through
parcel.
Parcel 13: Tract B. Lionsridge, Filing #4
Low Priority: TOV acquire development rights or
conservation easement.
Parcel 14: Parcel East of Lot A3, Lionsridge, Filing #1
Low priority: TOV acquire development rights or
conservation easement.
* Parcel 15: Parcel A
High priority: Trail easement through this LOA par-
cel for North Trail. This parcel is also a trailhead for
the Buffer Creek trail. The Town would like to dean-
nex the north half of the parcel and acquire the south
half so that the road would be on TOV property.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Parcel 16: Portion of Tract D
Medium Priority: Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated
Water and Sanitation District willing to sell or swap
land. May have value as employee housing. (RETT
funds would not be used if future use is employee
housing)
Parcel 17: Tract D. Lionsridge. Filing #1
Medium Priority: TOV acquire conservation ease-
ment for permanent open space to protect drainage
on Red Sandstone Creek.
Parcel 18: Unplated Parcel. Vail Potato Patch, 2nd
Ming
Low priority: TOV acquire for open space.
Parcel 19: Unplated Vail Village, 2nd Filing
Medium Priority: TOV acquire conservation ease-
ment on area around Red Sandstone Creek to protect
trees and stream.
* Parcel 20: Unvlated Parcel in Lionshead
High priority: TOV acquire or enter into a public
agreement with V.A. to protect the wetlands on the
site. Site does have multiple social trails which are
negatively impacting the hydric soils on the site.
One mitigation to consider is a path from the pedes-
trian bridge near Born Free lift to the Library to focus
use on a wood -chip path.
In- -
LIONSHEAD
0
0
* Parcel 12: Tract A, Lionsridge, Filing #4
High priority: TOV acquire trail easement through
parcel.
Parcel 13: Tract B. Lionsridge, Filing #4
Low Priority: TOV acquire development rights or
conservation easement.
Parcel 14: Parcel East of Lot A3, Lionsridge, Filing #1
Low priority: TOV acquire development rights or
conservation easement.
* Parcel 15: Parcel A
High priority: Trail easement through this LOA par-
cel for North Trail. This parcel is also a trailhead for
the Buffer Creek trail. The Town would like to dean-
nex the north half of the parcel and acquire the south
half so that the road would be on TOV property.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Parcel 16: Portion of Tract D
Medium Priority: Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated
Water and Sanitation District willing to sell or swap
land. May have value as employee housing. (RETT
funds would not be used if future use is employee
housing)
Parcel 17: Tract D. Lionsridge. Filing #1
Medium Priority: TOV acquire conservation ease-
ment for permanent open space to protect drainage
on Red Sandstone Creek.
Parcel 18: Unplated Parcel. Vail Potato Patch, 2nd
Ming
Low priority: TOV acquire for open space.
Parcel 19: Unplated Vail Village, 2nd Filing
Medium Priority: TOV acquire conservation ease-
ment on area around Red Sandstone Creek to protect
trees and stream.
* Parcel 20: Unvlated Parcel in Lionshead
High priority: TOV acquire or enter into a public
agreement with V.A. to protect the wetlands on the
site. Site does have multiple social trails which are
negatively impacting the hydric soils on the site.
One mitigation to consider is a path from the pedes-
trian bridge near Born Free lift to the Library to focus
use on a wood -chip path.
In- -
LIONSHEAD
0
Town of Vail
* Parcel 21: Lot 2 ,Vail Village, 2nd Filing
High priority: TOV acquire view easement to main-
tain view of Gore Creek from West Meadow Drive.
* Parcel 22 Parcel Adjacent to the International
Bridge
High priority: TOV acquire as natural area in core
along Gore Creek which is a riparian area and is
located in the floodplain.
* Parcel 23: Tract E, Vail Village, 5th Filing
High priority: TOV acquire public use agreement
with V.A. to maintain use of existing trail and to cre-
ate an additional trail which connects into Mill
Creek/Ted Kindell pocket park.
* Parcel 24: Lot D-1, Vail Village
High priority: TOV acquire trail easement to main-
tain access to existing trail.
* Parcel 25: Golden Peak, Ski Base
High priority: TOV obtain public use agreement with
V.A. to maintain access to existing trail.
* Parcel 26: Unvlated Parcel, West of Public Works
High Priority: TOV acquire with Non RETT funding
source for future public works facility expansion.
This parcel is also were the snow dump is located.
The high priority action recommended is a trail ease-
ment for the North Trail.
* Parcel 27: Parcel C:
High Priority (LOA parcel): TOV and adjacent own-
ers to acquire northwest portion and deannex the
southwest portion
Parcel 27a: Parcel D
Low priority (LOA parcel): TOV and adjacent own-
ers to acquire north portion and deannex south por-
tion (to remain in NFS ownership).
Parcel 28: Parcel E
Medium priority (LOA parcel): TOV has acquired
northern portion and needs to deannex southern por-
tion (to remain in U.S. Forest Service ownership).
* Parcel 29 Tract F. Vail Village. 11th Filin
High priority: TOV acquire conservation easement
or public use agreement for riparian stream tract.
* Parcel 30: Tract C, Vail Villaa.11th Filing
High priority: TOV acquire conservation easement
or public use agreement for riparian stream tract.
* Parcel 31: Tract B, Vail Village. 11th Filing
High priority: TOV acquire conservation easement
or public use agreement for riparian stream tract.
* Parcel 32: Tract E. Vail Village. 11th Filing
High priority: TOV acquire conservation easement
or public use agreement for riparian stream tract.
Parcel 33: Parcel
Medium priority (LOA action): TOV acquire the
southern portion from the NFS and deannex the
northern portion to maintain the existing use by the
Water and Sanitation District and allow room to
improve the existing trailhead.
Parcel 34: Tract B. Vail Village 12th Filing
Low priority: Conservation easement for existing
drainage.
Parcel 35: Parcels G-2, G-3, G-4 and G-5
Low priority LOA parcels: TOV acquire from U.S.
Forest Service. Then TOV should trade these parcels
to CDOT for parcel 36 (which is now owned by
CDOT).
i
r� .yam•351 TO -AN OF'vAL BOUNDARY
Y PITKIN LAKE
TRAILHEAD
=v (337) I
Viz` -
21 J 4c
*Parcel 36: Unvlated Land North of East Vail
Interchange
High priority: TOV acquire development rights for
open space use or trade parcel(s) 35 for parcel 36.
Has potential for development.
Parcel 37: Unplated Land North of I-70
Medium priority: TOV acquire development rights
for open space use. Has potential for development.
* Parcel 38: Bighorn, 2nd Addition, Lot 5
High priority: TOV acquire parcel which is in flood-
plain for open space/ trail connection uses.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Parcel 39: Bighorn, 2nd Addition, Lot 1
Low priority: TOV acquire development rights to
protect riparian area.
* Parcel 40: Bighorn Subdivision, 2nd addition,
Lots 8,10,11
High priority: TOV acquire both development rights
and trail easement for South Trail extension. This
parcel is in a geologic hazard area.
* Parcel 41: Bighorn Subdivision, 2nd Addition,
Lot 16
High priority: TOV acquire both development rights
and trail easement for South Trail extension. This
parcel is in a geologic hazard area.
* Parcel 42. Unvlated land South of Lots 1-4, Block
2, Bighorn Subdivision, 1st Filing
High priority: TOV acquire both development rights
and trail easement for South Trail extension. This
parcel is in a hazard area.
i 143
144
a
TO7RJ JF ',AJ- DOLINDARY
49
YMIT= RIVE? NATIO4.41. FOR=E- j�/ •> •.
mac'
* Parcel 43: Bighorn Subdivision, Lot 11
High priority: TOV acquire for trailhead/pocket park
to access the proposed South Trail extension. This
parcel is in a geologic hazard area.
* Parcel 44: Unvlated land south of Bighorn
Estates Subdivisions
High Priority: TOV acquire trail easement and devel-
opment rights. This parcel is in a geologic hazard
area.
0
Town of Vail
* Parcel 45: Unplated land south of Forest Glen
Subdivision
High priority: TOV acquire trail easement to access
the proposed South Trail extension.
* Parcel 46: Unplated land south of Mountain
Meadows Townhomes and Courtside
High priority: TOV acquire trail easement to access
the proposed South Trail extension. This parcel is in
a geologic hazard area.
* Parcel 47: "Recreation Area" (not including water
tanksite)
High priority: TOV acquire conservation easement
for trail, trailhead, picnic area and continued use of
water tank. This parcel is in a hazard area.
* Parcel 48, Lots 1-12, Vail Meadows, Filing #2
High priority: Acquire to protect sensitive riparian
area.
Parcel 49: Parcel G
Low priority: LOA parcel: TOV acquire from U.S.
Forest Service for road access and open space uses.
Southwest corner of the parcel is a wetland.
Parcel 50: Unplated parcel between NFS Parcels G.
H_
Low priority: TOV acquire from CDOT. The open
space objective is to maintain access on the Frontage
Road and to preserve the remainder as open space.
* Parcel 51: Parcel H
High priority: TOV acquire from the U.S. Forest
Service (LOA parcel). High priority for- trail connec-
tion and protection of open space and low priority
for employee housing. RETT funds not to be used if
future uses include housing.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TOWN -
OWNED PARCELS
There are several parcels of land currently in Town
ownership that have been included in this study
because they have the potential to meet some of the
needs identified as part of this plan. These parcels
include:
Vail Commons, North Frontaae Road West
Employee housing is a highly appropriate use for
this site, along with commercial and public use facil-
ities, as needed. This use will help meet needs iden-
tified by the Vail Housing Authority. Because this is
not an "open space or parks" use, RETT funds will
not be used to develop this land.
274 Beaver Dam Road
This lot is a buildable home site zoned primary/sec-
ondary. With the sale of this property, the Town
could use the proceeds toward the open lands pro-
gram identified in this plan (combine with RETT
funds to further achieve the open space goals). A
title check must occur to ensure that protective
covenants do not preclude development on the site.
2497, 2485. 2477. and 2487 Garmish Drive
These four lots are located adjacent to the Town
Manager's house in West Vail. There is the potential
for a small pocket park associated with employee
housing on this property which would help meet the
park needs of this neighborhood and help address
some of the community's housing needs. A trailhead
accessing the North Trail is also possible at this loca-
tion.
Donovan Park
The Town of Vail has an approved Master Plan for
Donovan Park that includes a number of active recre-
ation program elements. Comments from the public
during the course of this project suggest that the
Town should revisit that Master Plan to ensure that
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
the program developed in1985 is relevant to today's
needs.
Tract A, Vail Village 13th Filing
Recently, a par 3 golf course has been proposed for
the site. The site has approximately .9 acres of wet-
lands on the site. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
has not approved a Section 404 permit for this pro-
posal. If the VRD does not receive a favorable vote
of the people by December 1, 1994 and the receive a
section 404 permit by December 1, 1995, it is this
plans recommendation that the property remain as
natural open space because of the wetlands on the
site.
Unplated Mountain Bell Site
Approximately half of this property(7.71 acres) is
intended for affordable housing and the remainder
of the site will remain in open space.
Berry Creek, Edwards
This property is a logical location for some of the
recreational needs identified in both this study and
the Eagle County and Avon recreation studies. The
joint use of this property to meet the needs of a wider
population (including Vail residents) is an appropri-
ate and cost effective way to meet recreation needs.
Housing is also an appropriate use on this site.
TOV Parcel adjacent to Vail Chapel
The north bank of the Gore Creek adjacent to the Vail
Chapel provides an excellent stream access area and
has been identified as a stream access area. Also, this
area is desirable for an informal take-out location for
kayakers. An additional bench or picnic table would
be desirable at this location.
TRAILS AND TRAILHEADS
Improvements and additions to the trail system in
and around Vail are an integral part of the Open
Lands Plan. There are numerous opportunities for
interpretive education along these trails. The pro-
posed trail system is somewhat similar to trail sys-
tems found in the Alps where interconnected trail
allow hikers to move around and to mountain vil-
lages.
0
DELUGE CREEK
iRAILFEAD
GORE LAKE
TRALHEAD
4
* Parcel 47: "Recreation Area" (not including water
tanksite)
High priority: TOV acquire conservation easement
for trail, trailhead, picnic area and continued use of
water tank. This parcel is in a hazard area.
* Parcel 48, Lots 1-12, Vail Meadows, Filing #2
High priority: Acquire to protect sensitive riparian
area.
Parcel 49: Parcel G
Low priority: LOA parcel: TOV acquire from U.S.
Forest Service for road access and open space uses.
Southwest corner of the parcel is a wetland.
Parcel 50: Unplated parcel between NFS Parcels G.
H_
Low priority: TOV acquire from CDOT. The open
space objective is to maintain access on the Frontage
Road and to preserve the remainder as open space.
* Parcel 51: Parcel H
High priority: TOV acquire from the U.S. Forest
Service (LOA parcel). High priority for- trail connec-
tion and protection of open space and low priority
for employee housing. RETT funds not to be used if
future uses include housing.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TOWN -
OWNED PARCELS
There are several parcels of land currently in Town
ownership that have been included in this study
because they have the potential to meet some of the
needs identified as part of this plan. These parcels
include:
Vail Commons, North Frontaae Road West
Employee housing is a highly appropriate use for
this site, along with commercial and public use facil-
ities, as needed. This use will help meet needs iden-
tified by the Vail Housing Authority. Because this is
not an "open space or parks" use, RETT funds will
not be used to develop this land.
274 Beaver Dam Road
This lot is a buildable home site zoned primary/sec-
ondary. With the sale of this property, the Town
could use the proceeds toward the open lands pro-
gram identified in this plan (combine with RETT
funds to further achieve the open space goals). A
title check must occur to ensure that protective
covenants do not preclude development on the site.
2497, 2485. 2477. and 2487 Garmish Drive
These four lots are located adjacent to the Town
Manager's house in West Vail. There is the potential
for a small pocket park associated with employee
housing on this property which would help meet the
park needs of this neighborhood and help address
some of the community's housing needs. A trailhead
accessing the North Trail is also possible at this loca-
tion.
Donovan Park
The Town of Vail has an approved Master Plan for
Donovan Park that includes a number of active recre-
ation program elements. Comments from the public
during the course of this project suggest that the
Town should revisit that Master Plan to ensure that
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
the program developed in1985 is relevant to today's
needs.
Tract A, Vail Village 13th Filing
Recently, a par 3 golf course has been proposed for
the site. The site has approximately .9 acres of wet-
lands on the site. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
has not approved a Section 404 permit for this pro-
posal. If the VRD does not receive a favorable vote
of the people by December 1, 1994 and the receive a
section 404 permit by December 1, 1995, it is this
plans recommendation that the property remain as
natural open space because of the wetlands on the
site.
Unplated Mountain Bell Site
Approximately half of this property(7.71 acres) is
intended for affordable housing and the remainder
of the site will remain in open space.
Berry Creek, Edwards
This property is a logical location for some of the
recreational needs identified in both this study and
the Eagle County and Avon recreation studies. The
joint use of this property to meet the needs of a wider
population (including Vail residents) is an appropri-
ate and cost effective way to meet recreation needs.
Housing is also an appropriate use on this site.
TOV Parcel adjacent to Vail Chapel
The north bank of the Gore Creek adjacent to the Vail
Chapel provides an excellent stream access area and
has been identified as a stream access area. Also, this
area is desirable for an informal take-out location for
kayakers. An additional bench or picnic table would
be desirable at this location.
TRAILS AND TRAILHEADS
Improvements and additions to the trail system in
and around Vail are an integral part of the Open
Lands Plan. There are numerous opportunities for
interpretive education along these trails. The pro-
posed trail system is somewhat similar to trail sys-
tems found in the Alps where interconnected trail
allow hikers to move around and to mountain vil-
lages.
0
Town of Vail Draft Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
ACTION PLAN
Cornmehensive ODen Lands Plan
TOWN OF VAIL VAIL,COLORA0O
CORE AREA ENLARGEMENT
BOOM E
TpAa HFwo
POTATO PATCH
BOOTH FALLS
TOOTHT9.6 FALLS
TgN6
SANDSTONE PARK/
_
-
Calors
TOT LOT
ane ionear
,1 ����
�n�~���
LION'S RIDGE --
� j 1'
3•
SF�SAmLNE CRInFX wa[ OIEEK
_
^��^*^""�'•+'�'e'
'-
.._ FORD PARK-
.a.o,A.
)
FORD AMPHITHEATER
�� n�E
_ —
�. --
- q��,
,: 1 ,...... NATURE CENTER
_I _ y �•�
�' r.
LAKE
TR�n •EAD
1
f
�E OS RANCH \4
.__ EAST VAIL
BUFFEHR
D•
•
,.
\ KATSOS RANCH OPEN SPACE
\�
CREEKLIONSHEAD
PARK
_
•
z�q,
GOLF COURSE
VAIL HEIGHTS
\
—
GONDOLA
� r
•3
43
VAIL DAS
VAIL VILGEuoNSHEAD
q
SCHONE
TENNIS
COURTS
\
ROGER STAUB PARK
L
BIGHORN PARK
...
-
MILL CREEK/
TED KIND LL
muo.nv
TRACT
LEGEND
\\
VAIL RIDGE --- /
�_.
-•
DONOVAN
PARK
• •-._._..
_.. GORE\I
I /
�C
\
Dej"DEec
• �- — \•--- ----
DONOVAN PARK/-
............
. . PFK)MINADE
EXISTING SYSTEM
ACTION PARCEL
CG
--
CEMETARV
S�
WILLOW
PARK
�
g
P
TO OWNED LANDS
j
LANG RESERVE--
T"^LE`0
MATTERHORN
PUBLIC USE
•
PUBLIC USE
® DEVELOPED PARKS.
PARK
l
1Qi s
j
\
,
DESIGNATED PARKS-
OPEN SPACE/
\
INTERMOUNTAIN
L__. NOT DEVELOPED
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
J
POCKET PARK �
�.nwveww*vrx.aew
..'
! \
LANDSTOV OWNED
FOREST SERVICE LAND
�
J OPEN SPACE USE
DE -ANNEX (LOA PROCESS)
®
\�
STEPHENS PARK
UNDEVELOPED PARCEL (OPEN SPACE ZONING)
rI� �
TRADE TO FOREST SERVICE
PROCESS)
+owo .ouou.
ACTION NOT RECOMMENDED_.
(LOA
UNDEVELOPED PARCEL (ZONING VARIES)
ACQUIRE FROM FOREST SERVICE
INTERMOUNTAIN
ACTION NOT RECOMMENDED
(LOA PROCESS)
EXISTING PAVED OFF- ROAD TRAIL
PROPOSED PAVED OFF- ROAD TRAIL
�---� EXISTING BIKE ROUTE OR LANE
PROPOSED BIKE PATH OR LANE
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
IMPROVE EXISTING TRAILHEAD
REVISED TOWN BOUNDARY
Exhibit 5
PROPOSED TRAILHEAD
Action Plan
TTT
Town of Vail
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Parcel #
Parcel Description
Property Owner(s)
Zoning
Open Space Objective
Proposed Use
Priority
1
Trappers Run, Lots 16, 19, 21
John Ulbrich
Hillside Residential
Environmental Protection, Forest Access
Open Space, Park, Trail, Trail Access
H
2
Unplatted Parcel north of Vail Ridge
L. Ladner, Inc.
Resource, Eagle County
Trade Parcel to Forest Service
National Forest
H
3
Unplatted Parcel north of Vail Das Schone, Filing # 2
Town of Vail (needs confirmation)
Resource, Eagle County
Trade Parcel to Forest Service
National Forest
H
4
Unplatted Parcel north of Vail Heights
Town of Vail (needs confirmation)
Resource, Eagle County
Trade Parcel to Forest Service
National Forest
H
5
Wirth Property, Tract D
Hud Wirth
Two Family Primary/ Secondary
Land Reserve
Housing
H
6
Intermountain, Lot 14, 2724 Snowbery Drive
George B. Miller
Two Family Primary/ Secondary
Environmental Protection
Open Space
H
7
Lot 35, Buffer Creek
Kasparitis Roman Otlij
Two Family Primary/ Secondary
Park
Addition to Buffher Park
M
8
Lot 36, Buffer Creek
Kasparitis Roman Otlij
Two Family Primary/ Secondary
Park
Addition to Buffher Park
H
9
Lot 1, Vail Village West, Filing #2
Vail Valley West
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Retain Natural Drainage
H
10
Lot 2, Vail Village West, Filing # 2
Aldrote J. Antonio
Two Family Primary/ Secondary
Environmental Protection
Bike Path, Creek Access
H
11
Coldstream
Cascade Club
SDD
Community Park
Addition to Donovan Park
L
12
Tract A, Lionsridge, Fling # 4
Lionsridge Homeowners Association
GB -NOS
Trade Parcel to Forest Service
National Forest
H
13
Tract B, Lionsridge, Fling # 4
Lionsridge Homeowners Association
GB -NOS
Environmental Protection
Open Space, Trail
L
14
Excepted parcel east of lot A3, Lionsridge, Fling # 1
A. L. Shapiro Co.
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Open Space
L
15
Parcel A, Lionsridge Filing #1
US Forest Service
AG -OS
Road Access, Trail Access
Road Access/ Trailhead
H
16
Tract D, Lionsridge Filing #1
Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated W&S Dist.
Public Use District
Land Reserve
Employee Housing
M
17
Tract D, Lionsridge, Fling # 1
Sandstone Creek Condo Association
GB -NOS
Environmental Protection
Retain Natural Drainage
M
18
Unplatted parcel, Vail Potato Patch 2nd filing
Jack Camie
Residential Cluster
Open Space
Open Space
L
19
Unplatted Vail Village, 2nd filing
Holy Cross Electric
Arterial Business District
Land Reserve
Public Use
M
20
Unplatted Parcel south of Gore Creek and north of Forest Road
Vail Associates, Inc.
AG -OS
Parks and Trails (?)
Park, Trail
H
21
Lot 2 VV 2nd Filing, 122 West Meadow Drive
Weist Otto
Two Family Primary/ Secondary
Gore Creek Access
Gore Creek, Streamwalk Access
H
22
Parcel near Intemational Bridge, Vail Village 1 st filing
Vail Associates, Inc.
Public Accomodation
Open Space, Gore Creek Access
Open Space
H
23
Tract E, Vail Village, 5th Fling
Vail Associates, Inc.
AG -OS
Trail/ Environmental Protection
Retain Natural Drainage/Trail
H
24
Lot D-1, Vail Village, 5th Filing
Vail Associates, Inc.
AG -OS
Trail
Trail
H
25
Golden Peak 458 Ski Base
Vail Associates, Inc.
Ski Base Rec District
Trail Access
Trail
H
26
Unplatted Parcel north of 1-70 and west of TOV shops
Vail Associates, Inc.
AG -OS/ Public Use
Land Reserve/Trail
Public Works Expansion, Snow Storage
H
27
Parcel C
US Forest Service
GB -NOS
Environmental Protection
LOA Parcel
H
27a
Parcel D
US Forest Service
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
National Forest
L
28
Parcel E
US Forest Service
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
National Forest
M
29
Tract F, Vail Village, 11th Filing
Vail Associates, Inc.
AG -OS
Environmental Protection/Recreation
Retain Riparian Corridor
H
30
Tract C, Vail Village 11 th Filing
Vail Associates, Inc.
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Retain Riparian Corridor
H
31
Tract B, Vail Village, 11th Filing
Vail Associates, Inc.
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Retain Natural Drainage
H
32
Tract E, Vail Village, 11th Filing
Vail Associates, Inc.
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Retain Natural Drainage
H
33
Parcel F
US Forest Service
Public Use
Water Storage/Trailhead Access
Water Storage/Trailhead
M
34
Tract B, Vail Village, 12th Filing
Vail Associates, Inc.
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Retain Natural Drainage
L
35
Parcels G-2, G-3, G-4, G-5
US Forest Service
GB -NOS
Environmental Protection
Open Space
L
36
Unplatted land north of East Vail interchange
CDOT
Two Family Residential
Environmental Protection
Open Space
H
37
Unplatted land north of I-70 and Bighorn Subdivision, 3rd addition
Eagle Co. Development Corp.
Two Family Residential
Environmental Protection
Open Space
M
38
Bighorn 2nd Addition, Lot 5
Athena Buxman
Two Family Primary/ Secondary
Environmental Protection
Open Space/Trail
H
39
Bighorn 2nd Addition, Lot 1
Athena Buxman
Two Family Primary/ Secondary
Environmental Protection
Open Space/Trail
L
40
Bighorn Subdivision, 2nd Addition, Lots 8, 10, 11
Athena Buxman
Two Family Primary/ Secondary
Environmental Protection
Open Space/Trail
H
41
Bighorn Subdivision 2nd Addition, Lot 16
Stanley and Martha Wilson
AG -OS
Env. Protection, High Scenic Value
Open Space
H
42
Unplatted land south of lots 1-4, Block 2, Bighorn Subdivision, 1st filing
Consolidated Oil and Gas, Inc.
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Open Space
H
43
Bighorn Subdivision, Lot 11
H. DeBody, H. Demmalee
Two Family Residential
Trail he ad/Pocket Park
Trailhead
H
44
Unplatted land south of Bighorn Estates Subdivision
Cara Beutel
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Open SpacefTrailhead
H
45
Unplatted land south of Forest Glen Subdivision
Consolidated Oil and Gas, Inc.
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Open Space/Trail
H
46
Unplatted land south of Mountain Meadows Townhouse and Courtside
Consolidated Oil and Gas, Inc.
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Open Space/Trail
H
47
"Recreation Area" - not including water tank site
Assessor does not know
Public Use
Environmental Protection/ Public Use
Open Space[Trailhead/trail
H
48
Lots 1 and 2, Vail Meadows, Fling # 2
Holsten (1&2)& Vail City Corp (3-12)
AG -OS
Environmental Protection
Open Space
H
49
Parcel G
US Forest Service
NATOS
Environmental Protection
Open Space/RoadAccess
L
50
Unplatted parcel between Forest Service Parcels G and H
CDOT
NATOS
Road Access
Open Space/RoadAccess
L
51
Parcel H
US Forest Service
NATOS
Land Reserve/Trail Access
Open Space/Trail Access/Housing
H
Table 8
Action Parcels
Listed West to East
0
Town of Vail
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Management
Management
Protection Techniques
System
Issues
N
O
U
0
m
0
d
12
01
'C
Uff
U
m
�
F` -
O
c
C ❑
m
W
m
V
�
3 xx m
E
O
0
Q
O
.E
E
m
a
O m m LL
m
01
m
c
J�
U
y
C
C
d
_
C
0
F
Y
LM
O
li
U
m
ry
a
O
tY��1
CL
E i % Q C
m
w
C
m
E
%
CL
2 O
V
C
C
d
N
O
m
Parcel # Parcel Description
0 O O W J
O
W
❑
❑
m
O
11 V
Q
J
J
_51,
x
ri
�
❑
1 Trappers Run, Lots 16, 19,21
1
•
cU (i
,
v
HC
•
O
•
•
•
m
c
2 Unplatted Parcel north of Vail Ridge
• •
a
o
=
O
•
Q
O
c
E
m
•
Q
N
m
LM
m
3 Unplatted Parcel north of Vail Das Schoe, Filing # 2
• •
m
O
6
F=
O
-
m
O
•
a
O
>
0
Parcel # Parcel Description
U
r
•
u
W
-j
4 Unplatted Parcel moth of Vail Heights
• •
D
m
r-
LL
8
•
P.1
-
x
LL
•
❑
25 Golden Peak 458 Ski Base
5 Wirth Property, Tract D
•
•
•
101
•
6 Intermountain, Lot 14, 2724 Snowberry Drive
•
26 Unplatted Parcel north of 1-70 and west of TOV shops
•
•
•
•
7 Lot 35, Buffer Creek
•
•
•
27 Parcel D
•
•
•
8 Lot 36, Buffer Creek
•
•
•
•
28 Parcel E
•
•
9 Lot 1, Vail Village West, Filing #2
•
•
•
•
•
10 Lot 2, Vail Village West, Fling # 2
•
29 Tract F, Vail Village, 11th Fling
•
•
•
•
•
•
11 Coldstream
•
•
•
30 Tract C, Vail Village 11th Fling
•
•
•
•
•
•
12 Tract A, Lionsridge, Filing # 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
31 Tract B, Vail Village, 11 th Fling
•
13 Tract B, Lionsridge, Filing # 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
14 Excepted parcel east of IotA3, Lionsridge, Fling # 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
15 Parcel A
•
•
33 Parcel F
•
•
•
•
16 Tract D
•
•
•
34 Tract B, Vail Village, 12th Fling
•
•
•
17 Tract D, Lionsridge, Fling # 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
18 Unplatted parcel, Vail Potato Patch 2nd filing
•
•
•
•
•
•
19 Unplatted Vail Village, 2nd filing
•
36 Unplatted land north of East Vail interchange
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
20 Unplatted Parcel south of Gore Creek and north of Forest Road
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
21 Lot 2 VV 2nd Fling, 122 West Meadow Drive
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
38 Bighorn 2nd Addition, Lot 5
•
•
22 Parcel near International Bridge, Vail Village 1st filing
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
23 Tract E, Vail Village, 5th Fling
39 Bighorn 2nd Addition, Lot 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
24 Lot D-1, Vail Village, 5th Fling
•
•
•
•
•
40 Bighorn Subdivision, 2nd Addition, Lots 8, 10, 11
•
•
•
•
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Table 9
Protection and Management Techniques for Action Parcels
0
Management
Management
Protection Techniques
System
Issues
U
m
N
L
O
m
L
CL
0
Q
O
.E
01
c
J�
U
y
_
C
0
F
Y
O
li
W
F
m
ry
a
O
tY��1
8
m
O)
m
d
O
m
E
N
Z
>
m
v
cU (i
,
v
HC
Q
O
a)
.�
m
c
7
a
o
=
O
Q
O
Q
O
c
E
m
a
O
Q
N
m
LM
m
0
y
`O
m
O
6
F=
O
-
m
O
m
p
a
O
>
0
Parcel # Parcel Description
U
r
r-
u
W
-j
o
W❑
D
m
r-
LL
8
Q
P.1
-
x
LL
❑
25 Golden Peak 458 Ski Base
•
101
26 Unplatted Parcel north of 1-70 and west of TOV shops
•
•
•
•
•
27 Parcel D
•
•
28 Parcel E
•
29 Tract F, Vail Village, 11th Fling
•
•
•
•
•
30 Tract C, Vail Village 11th Fling
•
•
•
•
•
31 Tract B, Vail Village, 11 th Fling
•
•
•
•
•
32 Tract E, Vail Village, 11th Filing
•
•
•
•
•
33 Parcel F
•
•
•
j•
•
34 Tract B, Vail Village, 12th Fling
•
•
•
•
•
35 Parcels G-2, G-3, G-4, G-5
•
36 Unplatted land north of East Vail interchange
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
37 Unplatted land north of 1-70 and Bighorn Subdivision, 3rd addition
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
38 Bighorn 2nd Addition, Lot 5
•
•
•
•
•
•
39 Bighorn 2nd Addition, Lot 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
40 Bighorn Subdivision, 2nd Addition, Lots 8, 10, 11
•
•
•
•
41 Bighorn Subdivision 2nd Addition, Lot 16
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
42 Bighorn Subdivision, Lot 11
•
•
•
•
•
43 Unplatted land south of lots 1-4, Block 2, Bighorn Subdivision, 1st filing
•
10
•
44 Unplatted land south of Bighorn Estates Subdivision
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
45 Unplatted land south of Forest Glen Subdivision
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
46 Unplatted land south of Mountain Meadows Townhouse and Courtside
•
•
•
•
•
•
47 'Recreation Area' - not including water tank site
•
•
•
•
•
48 Lots 1 - 12, Vail Meadows, Filing # 2
•
•
•
61
•
•
•
49 Parcel G
•
•
•
•
•
50 Unplatted parcel between Forest Service Parcels G and H
•
•
•
•
•
51 Parcel H
•
•
•
•
Table 9
Protection and Management Techniques for Action Parcels
0
Town of Vail
The objective of the trail system is to create a looping
trail system around the Town of Vail. A feasibility
analysis should be done to make a final determina-
tion where trail easements are needed.
An interpretive program could be developed in con-
junction with Vail Associates, the U.S. Forest Service,
and the Vail Recreation District to meet a variety of
goals shared by the Town and these other entities.
Additionally, a comprehensive sign program should
be designed and implemented to facilitate access to,
and travel on, the trail system.
Close coordination with the USFS and VA will be
critical in creating this trail system. Trails on NFS
lands will require design review by the U.S. Forest
Service and compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act.
Trail uses will also be carefully reviewed by the
Town and the U.S. Forest Service. The South Trail in
East Vail should only be a summer hiking trail.
However, the North Trail could be used for cross
country skiing in the winter. The North Trail and
trails connecting V.A. trails could also provide single
track cycling opportunities in the summer.
In this plan, trailheads are intended to go beyond the
traditional use of trailheads. Trailheads can be a
combination of a place to access a trail system and a
pocket park or nature area. This plan is intended to
augment the Vail Transportation Plan and Vail
Recreation Plan. Specific recommendations for
improvements to the existing system and new addi-
tions are described below:
SOUTH TRAIL
EXTEND VAIL TRAIL TO EAST VAIL
There is the potential to extend the Vail Trail to East
Vail and Gore Creek Campground to provide an
alternative hiking experience.
LIONSHEAD TRAILHEAD - NEW
A trail information "kiosk" with trail maps and signs
within the Lionshead core area is recommended to
serve as a "Village trail head".
VAIL VILLAGE TRAMHEAD - NEW
A trail information "kiosk' with trail maps and signs
within the Town core area is recommended.
GOLDEN PEAK TRAILHEAD - NEW
Provide signs, bike racks, and trail extension(s) to the
existing bike path and/or parking at Golden Peak to
link the Vail Trail to the Village. Formal connections
are also needed between the Golden Peak Trailhead
and Pirate Ship Park and the pedestrian bridge
accessing Ford Park.
MATTERHORN TRAILHEAD - NEW
Signs and enforcement by the Town to limit on -street
parking is recommended. Trail work should be done
to minimize erosion currently taking place.
GOLF CLUBHOUSE TRAILHEAD - NEW
Provide signs and bike racks at the mid -point of the
Vail Trail (near the golf clubhouse). The first 1/4
mile of the trail should be re-routed to eliminate the
excessively steep portion of the trail.
BIGHORN/ GORE CREEK TRAILHEAD - NEW
Locate a trailhead on Willow Way in the Bighorn
Subdivision on Town of Vail owned land to access
the proposed Vail Trail extension. Provide a small
amount of off street parking, signs, and a bike rack.
BIGHORN PARK TRAILHEAD - NEW
Locate a trailhead south of Bighorn Park to access the
proposed South Trail extension. Provide off-street
parking, bike racks and signs.
WATER TANK TRAILHEAD - NEW
Provide a bike and pedestrian access trailhead with
signs and bike racks to connect to the proposed East
Vail extension and the Gore Creek Campground trail -
head. This would be a summer/fall trail only
because of the avalanche concerns in this area.
WESTIN TRAILHEAD-NEW
There is currently a ski trail (catwalk) which allows
people to ski to the Westin from the front face of the
mountain. In the summer this catwalk could be used
as a hiking trail to access V.A.'s network of trails.
GORE CREEK ACCESS AREAS
PARCELS 20, 21, 22 AND VAIL CHAPEL
Identify these parcels as stream access areas with
signs. The purpose of these access areas is to
allow public access to the Gore Creek. Parcel 20
will require some mitigation to prevent further
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
deterioration of vegetation and soils from the
use of "social" trails on the site. Mitigation solu-
tions will have to be discussed with Vail
Associates and the neighborhood. The Chapel
access would provide a convenient take-out area
for kayakers. The stream tract adjacent to the
Chapel is owned by the Town and is not identi-
fied as an action parcel. Another recommenda-
tion is that a map be created to identify public
areas along Gore Creek and discuss the rules of
a Gold Medal stream
MILL CREEK CONNECTION
Extend pedestrian path adjacent to Mill Creek in Ted
Kindell pocket park to the south to connect with
existing paved trail. (Christiania Lodge will provide
as part of redevelopment)
NORTH TRAIL
UPPER RIDGE CONNECTOR TRAIL
Potential to develop a trail along the north side of
Town to link existing trailheads and provide a south -
facing trail that will open up in the early spring. This
trail should not be located near the Eagle's Nest
Wilderness Area in order to avoid further impacts
there.
DAVOS TRAILHEAD - EXISTING
Potential to relocate trailhead onto Trappers Run if
property or easements are obtained. If not relocated,
bike racks and signs/ enforcement by the Town to
limit on -street parking are recommended.
BUFFEHR CREEK TRAILHEAD - EXISTING
Signs and enforcement by the Town to limit on -street
parking is recommended. Bike racks and safe bike
access to the trailhead are also recommended. The
U.S. Forest Service believes that they currently do not
own the parking area and are concerned that public
access to this area be permanently maintained.
PINEY LAKE TRAILHEAD - EXISTING
Expand use of Piney Lake trailhead to year-round
(currently functions as a winter trailhead) and relo-
cate to Parcel 15. At the new location, provide off-
street parking and a trail connection up the drainage
to link to the Piney Lake Road. Also provide signs
and bike racks.
0
Town of Vail
Draft Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
TRAILS FLAN
Comprehensive UQen Lends Plan
7OWN 04 VAIL VAIL,0OLQAA00
WLME
UOISI TME 1NAllt:AD
CORE AREA ENLARGEMENT
BOOM L
POTATO PATCH ---- BOOTH FALLS
NNEv� •,"�`A
LION'S RIDGE 4.y
.: NOOIF OtEEK
,��`�a+as � ... �, wNN 'Ir•vjiB�- nwuD -;p. r ` .' y,✓ - ��. ,-:n
.M�• 1
CREM
_ ... tI. RIRN LAKE
EAST VAIL
dO
•
` s
cam::.. - - .,.�...t ., ..., .AC �•),
�i ✓% Y•. .. nEsrn Ta�aHEnD I �,c - LiONSzIEAG ^_ �Fa�.wv� .`
1camvuEno l canrEN '°"uE"° Bcvw.'emi
VAIL HEIGHTS w�
irno _ iMuuD
VAtL OAS - -;�' .. ``.\ ��� -- JAIL VILLAGE _.... ,. �...;9t
TLA
SCHONE
3
.r
,
VAIL RIDGE`rJ •I, \
r
`� ht GONEAKE
t
1
° LEGEND acnoNwvux '
�,.-._-,,r iMtlfnD
"� ""1 ---- EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED TRAILS • /CRE
Davos -- ST.AT'cRHOR13 t `a y iMufwB
x.
JPROPOSED PAVED OFF-
- EXISTING PAYED OFF- ROAD TRAIL u ROAD TRAIL}"
EXISTING BIKE ROUTE OR LANE PROPOSED BIKE PATH OR LANE
_ EXISTINGSTRAR�� PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN TRAIL ���
PEDEIN TAIL NATBITANN \ r
i �! _, ➢.
�����• �� � IMPROVE EXISTING TRAILHEAD PROPOSED TRAILHEAD
INTERMOUNTAIN
Exhibit 6
Trails Plan
Town of Vail
SPRADDLE CREEK TRAILHEAD - EXISTING
As part of the Spraddle Creek development, provide
improved trailhead at Spraddle Creek including off-
street parking, signs and bike racks.
MIDDLE CREEK TRAILHEAD - NEW
This lower trailhead, just west of Spraddle Creek,
will access trails that connect to Piney Lake and the
new Tenth Mountain Trail Association huts via an
off road bike path, which would greatly add to the
mountain biking opportunities in this area. Include
at this trailhead off-street parking, signs and bike
racks.
BOOTH LAKE TRAILHEAD - EXISTING
Signs and enforcement by the Town to limit on -street
parking are recommended. Trail is heavily over-
used. Bike racks and safe bike access to the trailhead
are also recommended.
PITKIN LAKE TRAILHEAD - EXISTING
At existing location, bike racks and signs/ enforce-
ment by the Town to limit on -street parking are rec-
ommended. There is the potential to provide an
improved trailhead with off-street parking on Parcel
33 if easements are obtained.
BIGHORN CREEK TRAILHEAD - EXISTING
Small, off-street parking area recommended in flat
area near existing trailhead. Design solutions for
parking should be reviewed by the neighborhood.
Bike racks and signs/ enforcement by the Town to
limit on -street parking at the cul-de-sac is also recom-
mended.
GORE LAKE TRAILHEAD - EXISTING
Safety improvements for trailhead access and park-
ing and installation of bike racks are recommended.
With possible trade of parcel 51 to the Town from the
U.S. Forest Service, development and management
issues need to be clarified. Town development of the
trailhead with U.S.F.S maintenance/ management is
recommended.
BIKE SYSTEM
FRONTAGE ROAD BIKE LANES
Provide striped and signed bike lanes on both sides
of the frontage roads the entire length of the valley.
Key segments of the bike path which are already
funded include: Conoco Station to Dowd Junction
and Red Sandstone School to Spraddle Creek subdi-
vision
PAVED SHOULDERS ON VAIL VALLEY DRIVE TO
SUNBURST DRIVE
Pave shoulders on Vail Valley Drive for a safer recre-
ation path east of the core area. The right of way
(ROW) is too narrow for complete bike lanes on
either side, but paved shoulders will make the recre-
ation path significantly safer and easier to use for
both drivers and cyclists/ skaters/ pedestrians.
BIKE PATH EXTENSION FROM WEST VAIL
INTERCHANGE TO SAFEWAY
Complete separated bike path along North Frontage
Road by linking the West Vail Interchange with the
west end of the bike path near Safeway.
®LAND MANAGEMENT
Two key concepts underlie the proposed manage-
ment system for Vail's open lands. First, the
Town should establish a cooperative management
system with both the U.S. Forest Service and Vail
Associates. The need for these new management
partnerships stems from the fact that a large portion
of the lands which can provide recreational and open
space benefit to the Town, lie outside the Town
boundaries. Defining a management approach
which clearly identifies responsibilities is in the inter-
ests of all parties. Second, with the addition of new
open space lands and trails called for in this plan, the
Town needs to develop a management capability to
provide appropriate stewardship and maintenance to
these properties.
COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
U.S. Forest Service
This plan proposes a number of improvements to
National Forest System lands to improve condi-
tions in the National Forest System and provide Vail
visitors and residents with greater recreational
opportunities. The trailhead and trail improvements
proposed in this plan need to be constructed and
maintained. The Town and the U.S. Forest Service
should also discuss the desirability of toilets at heavi-
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
ly used trailheads. Since these improvements will
primarily benefit the Town it is important to develop
a realistic sharing of the construction and mainte-
nance costs. It is recommended that a cooperative
approach be taken to development of trailheads,
trails, signs. and maintenance of trail systems. All
trail systems that are proposed on NFS lands must
comply with the National Environmental Policy Act
which will require the Town and the U.S.F.S. to coop-
erate in the preparation of environmental analysis for
the trail system.
Vail Associates Trails Plan
This plan proposes that a joint system of trailheads
and signs be developed for access to Vail Mountain.
a. Trails and trailheads on Vail Mountain to be
constructed by VA with possible financial
participation by the Town and maintained
and managed by Vail Associates with possi-
ble financial participation from the Town.
b) Vail Associates and the Town should cooper-
ate on providing village trailheads and infor-
mational kiosks to improve trail connections
between the Town and the Vail
Associates permit area.
TOWN OF VAIL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
One of the goals of this plan is to accomplish the
open space objectives of the TOV in a cost effective
manner which tailors the protection technique to the
Town's open space objectives. In a number of
instances this means that instead of acquiring lands
the Town may pursue alternative techniques which
keep land on the tax rolls and minimize management
responsibilities. As discussed earlier, this can be
accomplished through the use of land trades and the
purchase or donation of conservation and trail ease-
ments. The Town's ability to negotiate in a flexible
and cooperative spirit will determine, to a great
extent, whether it can obtain many of the interests in
land that it seeks at minimal cost and management
burden. There are five components of the proposed
property management strategy.
1) Easement and Land Negotiator
The TOV should engage the services of a
skilled real estate negotiator that has had
experience in working with landowners on
easements, bargain sales, tax advantaged
0
Town of Vail
gifts, installment purchases, land trades,
advantages of public acquisition and dona-
tions of partial interests in property. The
negotiator should work with the TOV on the
priority acquisition program to structure all
acquisitions, whether full fee or partial inter-
ests such as easements, in a manner which
minimizes the cost to the Town and meets
landowner objectives. As has been demon-
strated by many land trusts, this type of cre-
ative approach to land protection can signifi-
cantly reduce protection costs and also mini-
mize land maintenance obligations. The
negotiator can be either a TOV employee or a
contractor, but must dedicate a significant
amount of time to these negotiations if they
are to save the Town acquisition funds and
management expense. The negotiator must
be capable of working with the Town attor-
ney on a variety of acquisition and easement
instruments.
2) Management. Maintenance and Liability
Audit
Prior to the time that a property is acquired
by the Town, an audit will be performed of
the management requirements and site con-
ditions which require Town expense. The
maintenance fund within the RETT funds
could be expanded by the annual operating
expenses for each parcel of land if they are
significant. The services of a professional
Forester may be desired to analyze the impli-
cations of maintenance and forest manage-
ment on a number of the action parcels.
Other areas that should be included in a
audit include: previous owners & activities;
existence of hazards, e.g. rockfall, debris
flow; storage or release of hazardous materi-
als on the site; and condition of any existing
infrastructure that may require maintenance.
3) Expand Capability of Landscape
Maintenance Operations & Forest
Management
This plan seeks to minimize the additional
management requirements on the Landscape
Maintenance Fund for the maintenance of
park and open space lands that may be
acquired by the Town. However, there may
be a need to expand this current capacity to
manage these lands. The Town should also
consider contracting or hiring on a part-time
basis a professional forester to help manage
Town forest resources.
4) Establish a Junior Ranger Program
As the open land system increases in size, the
Town should consider establishing a Junior
Ranger program to assist in maintenance
functions and productively engage the youth
of the Town. A growing number of commu-
nities with open land systems are utilizing
local high school students in the summer to
perform a variety of land management tasks.
Most often these tasks relate to trail mainte-
nance, trail construction, general mainte-
nance and supplementing ranger patrols.
These Junior Ranger programs have proven
to be extremely popular with the students,
have served to educate them on stewardship
issues and have proven to be cost effective in
performing certain tasks. They do require a
significant amount of organization and
supervision but are worth the effort. A vari-
ety of federal and state summer employment
programs might assist in supporting such a
program. This program may be of interest to
the VRD and could be managed through the
Nature Center.
5) Utilize Volunteer Assistance to Build Trails
and Monitor TOV Owned Lands
There is significant precedence in Colorado
for volunteer construction of trails. Both
Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado and the
Colorado Trail, among others, are examples
of volunteer, non-profit organizations with
trail design and construction expertise. One
of the many benefits of utilizing volunteers is
that it will connect the community to its
resources and give the participants a sense of
stewardship. Once a trail or other facility is
constructed, volunteers can be utilized in an
"adopt -a -trail" type program to help maintain
the facility.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
®IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
The Town should move in an aggressive and pro-
active fashion in three key areas if it is to create
the open space system identified in this plan. The
first is the design of the new community -wide trail
system and application for funds, the second is the
negotiation for those key priority parcels identified in
the plan, and the third is structuring the RETT funds
to meet acquisition objectives. There are options for
additional funding sources, described below.
FUNDING SOURCES
The Town of Vail is fortunate that it has a dedicat-
ed source of funding for the acquisition, develop-
ment and maintenance of park, recreation and open
space lands. This is the Real Estate Transfer Tax
(RETT) which is a 1% tax on all real estate transfers
within the Town of Vail. Over the past five years this
tax has generated $1.3 to $2 million in revenues annu-
ally. The revenues from RETT are allocated to a vari-
ety of uses including: purchase of open space; debt
service for previous open space purchases; park and
trail development and maintenance; and repayment
of other Town funds (i.e. Capital Improvement Fund)
which were used to previously acquire open space.
Due to the sizable amount of the revenue which is
allocated to development and maintenance of park
and open space facilities, only a portion is available
for acquisition. However, the Town has the ability to
borrow or bond against the future income stream
which indicates a capacity to significantly leverage
the funds available for acquisition. The Town
Council has authority over the allocation and use of
the RETT funds. The creative use and management
of this fund offers the greatest opportunity for the
Town to acquire the lands designated for purchase.
Other sources of funding potentially available to the
Town include:
1) State Trail Funds from the Colorado
Department of Parks and Outdoor Recreation
Stuart McDonald, State Trails Coordinator
Colorado Division of Parks and Outdoor
Recreation, 1313 Sherman Street, Room 618,
Denver, Colorado, 80203, (303) 866-3437.
0
Town of Vail
MdoMMM6 — A& Jr.*
2) Lottery and GOCO Funds
Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund, c/o
Kenneth Salazar, Board Chairman, Colorado
Department of Natural Resources, 1313
Sherman Street, Room 718, Denver,
Colorado, 80203, (303) 866-3311.
The passage of Amendment 8 in November,
1992 established the Great Outdoors
Colorado (GOCO) Trust Fund. When the
Colorado lottery was established in 1980,
most Coloradoans thought that proceeds
were going to be directed to parks, recreation
and open space as specified in the referen-
dum. However, the legislature funded a
variety of capital projects with lottery pro-
ceeds so that less than half the net revenues
were going to the intended purposes. The
passage of Amendment 8 clearly directs all
lottery proceeds to the GOCO Trust Fund
and the Conservation Trust Fund. The
GOCO Trust Fund is entirely funded by lot-
tery revenues and will be phased in over the
next five years as programs currently funded
by the lottery are terminated.
A fifteen member, governor appointed board
has been appointed to oversee the direction
of the program. Eventually, GOCO may
have as much as $35 million to distribute to
four program areas. These include State
Outdoor Recreation, State Division of
Wildlife, local parks grants, and open space
grants. The board has begun meeting and
expects to have an executive director by the
first of the year. The first cycle of grants
should begin by Spring 1994. Vail would be
able to compete for funds from both the local
grants and open space grants portions of the
program. While the criteria for rewarding
funds has not been finalized, initial indica-
tions are that those communities which
established their open land and park priori-
ties and have dedicated resources to these
issues will be in a better position to compete
for funds. The first year funding level is
expected to be in the range of $10 to $12 mil-
lion.
3) Sales or other Town Taxes
Given the availability of the RETT funds it is
unlikely that another tax would be dedicated
to open space acquisition.
4) CountyQpen Space Fund
It has been proposed that Eagle County
establish a funding mechanism to protect
open space in the County. An Open Lands
Committee has been created to determine the
best way to protect open lands in Eagle
County. Creating a land trust is one idea that
is being explored by the committee. If a land
trust was created it may serve as a vehicle for
protecting lands in Vail. However, it is antic-
ipated that the primary objective of a County
land trust would be to protect agricultural
open space.in unincorporated areas of Eagle
County.
PHASING
The RETT funds provide the Town with a substantial
source of funds for implementing the Comprehensive
Open Lands Plan. The Town Finance Department
has produced several scenarios of RETT revenues
which indicate the amount of funds available for
existing programs and to fund new acquisition and
development of park, recreation and trail facilities.
In addition to the Town's scenarios (scenarios 1&2),
another scenario (scenario 3) was produced assuming
a higher level of revenue. The three revenue scenario
that were examined are:
Scenario 1- $1.2 million,
Scenario 2 - $1.5 million, and
Scenario 3 - $1.7 million.
The average of the past five years RETT revenues is
slightly in excess of $1.7 million, with two years close
to or above $2 million. Scenario number three, $1.7
million in revenues per year, was selected to analyze
the potential amount of funds available for open
space acquisition and park and trail projects. As in
the other two scenarios, $1.6 million was budgeted
for projects in 1993. However, because of the
increase in revenues and an assumption that a fund
balance of $800,000 would be maintained annually
from then on, significant increases in funds available
for projects can be seen. The $800,000 fund balance
minimum has been identified as a desirable cushion
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
for potential changes in revenue and unanticipated
short-term needs. As a result, the following amounts
are projected for the six year period from 1994
through 1999.
1994
$1,400,000
1995
$
300,000
1996
$
300,000
1997
$
850,000
1998
$
850,000
1999
$
800,000
TOTAL $4,500,000
RETT funds decline sharply in 1995 because the exist-
ing fund balance in excess of $800,000 is utilized in
1994. In addition, after 1996 the transfers to capital
projects for debt service are completely paid off so
that the amount available increases by over $500,000.
FOUR YEAR FUNDING NEEDS
The high priority lands for the Vail Open Space
System fall into three categories for protection.
These are full fee purchase, obtaining trail and con-
servation easements, and funding trail, trailhead and
park improvements. Cost estimates are only avail-
able on fee purchases since cost may vary dramatical-
ly depending on individual negotiations for ease-
ments. In the fee purchase category, the purchase of
the sensitive natural areas, riparian areas and full fee
trail easements total between $2.5 and $3.0 million.
The cost of acquiring trail and conservation ease-
ments may vary widely between landowners. The
objective is to obtain as many of these easements
through donation as possible. If we assume that
most of these can be obtained through donations and
bargain sales, but that there will need to be a signifi-
cant amount of negotiation and transaction time
attached to obtaining these easements we can allocate
in the range of $200,000 annually to this effort over a
five year period. Finally, the new trail, trailhead and
park construction will require an analysis of the feasi-
bility and design of these facilities before accurate
estimates are possible.
C
Town of Vail
Year
Priority Action
Negotiations and Acquisition
Design and Construction
Budget
Total
om
RETT Revenues
1994
Environmental Protection
Lard Negotiator
Parks/Trails
50.0013
290,000
220,000
180,000
Bike Lanes
Negotiate Easements
40,000
550,000
TOTAL
2,500,000
610,000
Negotab Purchase
950,000
2,.00,000
Begin Lard Trade Negotiations (LOA)
20,000
SouthTraiV East Vail
Negotiate Easements
50,000
Design
00,000
Begin Construction
30,000
Signage Program
20,000
Neighborhood Planning
15,000
North Trail/West Vail
Neighborhood Planning
15,000
2,500,000
1,40%000
Land Negotiator
550,E
1995
Environmental Protection
Negotiale Purchase
230,000
Negotiate Easements
20,000
Continue Land Trade OA
20,000
SouthTraiV East Vail
Negotiate Easements
20,000
Construction
220,000
Stream access/ Core Area
Design signs and/or maps of stream access
a Peas
10,000
North Trail/West Vail
Negotiate Easements
40.E
610,000
300,000
Lard Negotiator
50,000
1095
Environmental Protection
Negotiate Easements
20,000
Negotiete Purchase
100,000
Continue Land Trade (LOA)
20,000
SouthTraiV East Vail
Construction
50,000
Stream Access/Core Area
ligate impacts/Consolidate
10,000
Trail on VA Prope
North Trail/West Vail
Negotiate Easements
20,000
Design
60,000
Begin Construction
00,000
Bike Lanes! Bike Improvements
Design
30,000
440,000
300,000
Begin Lower Priority Parcel Negotiations
Land ar
50,000
1997
taste Easements
20,000
Neaotiate Purchase
isnam
Bike Lanes/ Bike Improvements
Construction
550,000
North Trai V West Vail
Construction
180,000
950,000
650,900
1996
Continue Payments
65%000
1999
Continue Payments
600,E
TOTAL
4,500,000
4,500,000
I
Table 10
Six Year Plan
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
From this preliminary analysis, the following expen-
ditures can be made:
TOTAL FIVE YEAR PERIOD: $4,500,000
By committing money over a four year period and
paying the commitment over a 6 year period the
Town can meet the estimated costs for this plan. It
should be recognized that the costs estimated in
Table 10 could vary significantly based on:
1) Negotiations on individual parcels.
2) Based on zoning, Parcel 1 does have develop-
ment rights and a developer is currently
proposing a subdivision on this site. The
RETT fund balance referenced in Table 10
will greatly hinge on the disposition of this
property.
3) Expand the amount of time for the easement -
negotiations and trail/park construction pro-
gram and reduce the annual expenditure for
these items. In addition, if a substantial
amount of the trail and trailhead construction
can be accomplished by volunteer trail con-
struction crews, the construction budget
could be reduced.
4) The TOV could borrow or bond against the
RETT to meet the shortfall or combine bor-
rowing with a reduction in the fund balance
to meet these anticipated expenditures. The
borrowing could occur in the second year
after one years operation of the easement
acquisition and trails/parks construction
program so that the amounts allocated to
these activities could be evaluated and per-
haps reduced.
0
1994
1995
1996
1997
Environ. Protection
2,310,000
320,000
190,000
220,000
Parks/Trails
190,000
290,000
220,000
180,000
Bike Lanes
30,000
550,000
TOTAL
2,500,000
610,000
440,000
950,000
TOTAL FIVE YEAR PERIOD: $4,500,000
By committing money over a four year period and
paying the commitment over a 6 year period the
Town can meet the estimated costs for this plan. It
should be recognized that the costs estimated in
Table 10 could vary significantly based on:
1) Negotiations on individual parcels.
2) Based on zoning, Parcel 1 does have develop-
ment rights and a developer is currently
proposing a subdivision on this site. The
RETT fund balance referenced in Table 10
will greatly hinge on the disposition of this
property.
3) Expand the amount of time for the easement -
negotiations and trail/park construction pro-
gram and reduce the annual expenditure for
these items. In addition, if a substantial
amount of the trail and trailhead construction
can be accomplished by volunteer trail con-
struction crews, the construction budget
could be reduced.
4) The TOV could borrow or bond against the
RETT to meet the shortfall or combine bor-
rowing with a reduction in the fund balance
to meet these anticipated expenditures. The
borrowing could occur in the second year
after one years operation of the easement
acquisition and trails/parks construction
program so that the amounts allocated to
these activities could be evaluated and per-
haps reduced.
0
Town of Vail
ka
,.1
SIX YEAR PLAN
The Six Year Plan to implement the Vail
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan consists of a set
of specific actions for a four year implementation
program and a six year payment plan. The objective
of this plan is to closely match the implementation
actions to projected RETT revenues .
The Six Year Plan will address primarily the priority
projects which have been identified through this
process. These include the environmentally sensitive
lands, the South Trail properties, the Stream Access
in the Town core, the North Trail/West Vail proper-
ties and completion of the bike lanes on the Frontage
Road (See Table 10). It is important to remember that
only about one half of the properties identified for
protection will be included in these priority areas.
However, year four of the Action Plan will begin to
address the acquisition/ protection of these areas. It
is expected that in year four there will be an evalua-
tion of the program to -date to assess the process and
techniques utilized to ensure that the protection
process is occurring in as timely, creative and most
cost effective fashion as possible.
NEXT STEPS
The following generally describes the next steps
that should be taken to implement the
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan.
Hire or Contract the Services of a Property Manager
A property manager should be contracted to assist
the Town with land negotiations. This person must
be skilled in real estate transactions and negotiating
easements. This person should also closely review
RETT expenditures and make recommendations for
the restructuring of this fund.
Council Review of 6 year plan and RETT Fund
Shortly after adoption of this plan, the Vail Town
Council should review the six year work plan and
RETT income & expenditures to decide if restructur-
ing the RETT fund or additional borrowing is desir-
able to meet the objectives of this plan.
Begin Implementation of LOA Process
The Land Ownership Adjustment Process (LOA) has
been, and will continue to be, a cooperative project
between the Town of Vail, the U.S. Forest Service,
and Eagle County. The goals and objectives of this
process are described in detail in Appendix 1.
Through development of this plan, several of the
identified LOA parcels/ actions have received a high
priority because they help meet needs identified
through the priority analysis process . These are pri-
orities for both the Town of Vail and the USFS.
Town of Vail high priority LOA parcels (lands identi-
fied during the LOA process) include:
Parcel 1 - Trappers Run, Lots 16, 19, 21
Parcel l - Unplated Parcel N of Vail Ridge
Parcel 15 - Parcel A
Parcel 27 - Parcel C
Parcel 51 - Parcel H
The Town of Vail is interested in acquiring parcels 51,
15 (portion) from the U.S. Forest Service and convey-
ing parcels 2 and 1 (portion) to the U.S. Forest
Service. TOV and adjacent owners are interested in
acquiring the northwest portion of 27 and and dean-
nexing the southwest portion
The next level of priorities should be to work with
public entities on the issue of resolving the Water and
Sanitation District or other PUBLIC facilities on
National Forest System land within the Town. These
parcels include:
Parcel 33 - Parcel F
Parcel 28 - Parcel E
In both of these cases, the transaction involves con-
veyance of a portion of the National Forest System
owned parcel to the Town and the deannexation of
the remainder (which will remain in the National
Forest System). The remaining LOA parcels are con-
sidered a low priority but should be looked at first in
the context of balancing land values during the trade
of the High and Medium priority parcels.
The Town of Vail and the U.S. Forest Service should
pursue land trades on the identified parcels. The first
step in this process is to initiate separate land value
appraisals for these properties. Appraisals should be
sought for as many parcels as needed to acquire the
high (and possibly the medium) priority parcels in
order to balance the trade values. Of the high and
medium priority parcels, these include Parcels 51, 28,
and 27, and 27a .
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Design Trails and Seek Funding
The design of the first phase of the new South Trail
needs to be completed in order to determine financial
requirements and to begin fund raising. Funding for
the trail will be facilitated by a clear definition of the
trail system and understanding of its feasibility as
well as benefit to the Town. Funding can be sought
through the State Trails program, GOCO funds and
through local support. The GOCO funds will begin
to be dispersed later this year and it appears that
those communities which have done initial planning
and gathered community support will be in a more
favorable position to compete successfully for these
funds. The Town should also continue to look for
opportunities to improve regional trail connections.
Comprehensive Sign Program
With the addition of a number of trails and trail -
heads, and the improvement of existing trailheads, it
will be more critical to implement a comprehensive
sign program that is coordinated between the Town
of Vail, the U.S. Forest Service, and Vail Associates.
A sign program is currently in the process of being
implemented in the Town but it has not yet been tied
to the other trail systems that will, in the future, bet-
ter connect to the "in -town" trails. The core area
"trailheads" will serve as information "kiosks" that
will let the user know exactly how and where to
access the trail system.
West Meadow Drive
Plans currently exist to improve West Meadow Drive
with improved pedestrian and cycling paths and
landscaping. At the November 9,1993 Town Council
Meeting, Council directed staff to move ahead with
implementation of the West Meadow Drive plan as
an alternative to the streamwalk between Lionshead
and the Chapel Bridge.
Institute Neighborhood Planning Process
In response to the needs identified for both East and
West Vail, this plan recommends that neighborhood
planning processes be initiated for East and West
Vail to more fully understand the needs and deficien-
cies of these areas in regard to parks and recreational
facilities. These needs may relate to new parks, types
of park uses appropriate to the neighborhood, or to
reprogramming existing parks to better meet the
needs of residents and visitors. These meetings can
also be used to identify undeveloped lots in a neigh-
borhood that the neighborhood may wish to protect.
0
Town of Vail
Structure Use of RETT Funds
The Town needs to make some basic determinations
as to how it will utilize the RETT funds for acquisi-
tion of priority parcels. If it continues the current pay
as you go approach it has limited ability, compared
with other approaches which may entail some bor-
rowing. Currently, approximately $1.5 million is
committed to existing debt service and obligations.
Revenues which are received above this level could
be committed to the acquisition program.
TGV acts as Vehicle for Neighborhood Scale
Protection of Land
On parcels of land that a neighborhood is interested
in protecting, but are not part of the open space sys-
tem or do not have community -wide significance, the
Town of Vail can act as a facilitator to assist in pro-
tecting these lands. This role could range from act-
ing
cting as the buyer (with participation from the neigh-
borhood), to enabling the neighborhood to take
advantage of tax benefits, to accepting these lands so
the Town has management responsibilities. The
Town could play a variety of roles in financing acqui-
sition of lands ranging from negotiation, to providing
matching funds or providing partial funding to assist
in the protection of these lands. It is recommended
that a portion of the RETT be designated for protec-
tion of neighborhood open space. It is recommended
that a portion of the $800,000 RETT contingency fund
be used for this purpose.
Complete Zoning Changes
A critical element to open lands protection will
be completing the proposed zoning changes for
Greenbelt Natural Open Space and the
Agricultural Open Space Districts. After these
text changes are completed, Staff should recom-
mend zoning changes to specific parcels to
ensure that zoning is consistent with the Open
Lands Plan, Land Use Plan, and the current land
use on and adjacent to parcels.
Private Improvements to Public Land
On November 9,1993 the Town Council
instructed Town staff to identify areas where
unauthorized improvements on public lands
have occurred particularly on public stream tract
areas. This action will take considerable staff
time and should be identified in the Community
Development or Public Works work plan. In
addition, it is recommended that staff develop
recommendations for private property owners
to decrease impacts to sensitive natural areas,
such as Gore Creek, e.g. maintaining native veg-
etation along Gore Creek and its tributaries.
Permanent Protection of Lands Acquired for Vail
Open Lands System
One of the concerns frequently expressed at the pub-
lic meetings was the need to ensure that once lands
are acquired for open space, parks, and trails that
they be protected from conversion to other uses in
the future. This desire to ensure the permanence of
protection for these lands can be met in several ways.
The two potential models are first, the requirement of
a public vote for any change in use of these lands and
second, the use of a land trust (holding an easement
on these properties) as an insurance policy. The
Town should move quickly to first develop an ordi-
nance requiring a public vote to change the use or
zoning of open space and then explore the viability of
a land trust.
a. Public Vote to Change Use
One of the most common ways that lands
acquired with public funds for parks and
open space purposes can be protected from
conversion to other uses is to require a public
referendum for any change of use. Usually
this requires a charter amendment, as is the
case in Boulder and Denver. The charters of
both of these cities require a vote of the peo-
ple to convert open space and park land to
other uses. This prevents future city councils
or departments from taking actions to change
uses without first obtaining permission from
a majority of the electorate. This has never
happened with land in Boulder and is
extremely rare in Denver (the proposed sale
of Winter Park by the City of Denver, for
example, falls under this provision). This
approach has worked extremely well in juris-
dictions where it is utilized and allows future
town councils limited ability to change uses.
The Town should evaluate different protec-
tion techniques that have been used (e.g.
Boulder and Denver) and determine what is
appropriate for the Town of Vail.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
b. Establishment of a Land Trust
A second option is the use of an independent
land trust which would hold easements on
each of the parcels acquired for either open
space or parks. The choice of this option is
motivated by a desire to use conservation
easements on these lands to permanently
protect them from changing uses or being
developed. This approach is more complicat-
ed than the first option and, while it offers
the prospect of permanent protection, has a
number of hurdles to overcome before this
level of protection is achieved.
A land trust is a nonprofit, public purpose
organization which is dedicated to conserv-
ing open space lands. Land trusts range
from large organizations such as the Nature
Conservancy, Trust for Public Lands and
Colorado Open Lands to small, locally ori-
ented and volunteer organizations such as
the Clear Creek Conservancy, Eagle County
Land Trust, and Mesa County Land Trust.
There are 26 land trusts operating in
Colorado, most of them small and locally ori-
ented.
The primary vehicle utilized by land trusts to
protect open lands is the conservation ease-
ment. The conservation easement perma-
nently protects a property from development
and may specify various management prac-
tices which must be employed to ensure the
protection of conservation values. Generally,
a conservation easement is voluntarily given
by a landowner to a land trust or govern-
mental entity. An easement is a legally
enforceable restriction on property which is
recorded with the property deed. Many
landowners prefer to give easements to land
trusts as opposed to governmental entities
because they fear that governmental policy
and commitment to conservation may
change over time.
The landowner has complete use and man-
agement of a property with a conservation
easement on it. The land trust's responsibili-
ty is to monitor the use of the property to
ensure that the terms of the easement are not
violated. If they are violated, the land trust
has the responsibility of notifying the owner
of the violation and seeking compliance with
0
Town of Vail
the terms of the easement. If the owner fails
to remedy the situation, the land trust must
bring an enforcement action against the
owner in county court to correct the violation
(i.e. building in an easement area). The
responsibility of the land trust to monitor
and enforce the terms of the easement is per-
petual. As a result, the land trust must be a
capably run and viable entity for the long
term.
The placement of perpetual conservation
easements on the Town owned open space
and park lands could create an insurance pol-
icy that they would never be developed or
used in inappropriate ways. However, there
are a number of practical hurdles which must
be overcome before this technique is viable.
First, the Town must either work with an
existing land trust or help create a new land
trust in Vail or Eagle County. Several exist-
ing land trusts such as the Trust for Public
Land or the Eagle County Land Trust might
be willing to perform this service for the
Town. In order to monitor and enforce ease-
ments, most land trusts ask landowners for
payment of an endowment to cover antici-
pated costs. This is generally a one time pay-
ment which is placed in a stewardship fund
used for monitoring and enforcement.
The establishment of a local land trust in Vail
has been discussed for several years in order
to encourage voluntary conservation of
remaining open space lands. Land trusts are
generally supported by local contributions
and are active in a number of ski towns such
as Jackson Hole, Crested Butte, Telluride,
and Steamboat. In Crested Butte, the land
trust receives support from the Town of
Crested Butte's real estate transfer tax.
Under Colorado law, a land trust must be in
existence for at least two years before it can
accept easements.
The land trust option could work well if the
Town and the community are committed to
ensuring the long term viability of the land
trust. Since Vail is almost ninety percent
built out, there may be limited conservation
potential beyond the next ten years.
Therefore, the land trust might have a larger
geographical focus than just the Town of
Vail. There is an Eagle County Land Trust,
for instance, but it has not been very active in
concluding conservation transactions. If the
land trust option is to be pursued, the oppor-
tunities for collaboration with a larger or
national land trust should be explored as an
alternative to a purely local land trust. There
might be some interesting local/ national
hybrid land trust alternatives which might be
possible.
The land trust option can provide an inde-
pendent insurance policy to keep the open
space and park lands undeveloped.
However, there are a number of issues relat-
ed to establishing the land trust, affiliating
with a national land trust, ensuring the via-
bility of the land trust, and defining the inter-
action between the land trust and the Town
which must be addressed before the Town
can move with assurance in this direction.
CONCLUSION
This report presents an action plan designed to
implement the public's desires for protecting
environmentally sensitive lands, improving and
expanding the Vail Valley's trail system, and improv-
ing recreational opportunities.
The Action Plan spells out in detail a six year plan
that will achieve the highest priorities of the
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. In addition, rec-
ommendations are made to improve management of
TOV lands and to better integrate these lands into an
open lands system. The action plan is intended to be
flexible enough to take advantage of land opportuni-
ties as they arise. This plan provides a detailed
framework for creating a system of open lands and
interconnecting trails which will help maintain the
open character of Vail.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
0
Town of Vail
LAND OWNERSHIP AND ADJUSTMENT
PROCESS
The White River National Forest is in the process of
preparing a Land Ownership Adjustment Analysis
(LOA) for incorporation into the Forest Plan as an
amendment. This analysis will serve as a strategic
guide to manage land ownership of the forest and
will "classify" the forest with regard to disposal and
acquisition objectives. This plan has been fully inte-
grated into the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan.
The Vail Land Ownership Adjustment Task Force,
made up of representatives for the Town of Vail
(TOV) , U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and Eagle County
has been established for the purpose of cooperatively
developing a "desired" ownership pattern and a
common Town of Vail / NFS boundary. Other goals
of the task force include, but are not limited to,
resolving unpermitted encroachments and improve-
ments on National Forest lands, maintaining and
improving public access to National Forest lands and
jointly planning and integrating Town of Vail and
National Forest recreation opportunities.
Over the past two years, the LOA Task Force has
reviewed a number of lots and parcels throughout
the Town to determine their appropriateness for
inclusion into the Land Ownership Adjustment plan.
Review criteria included parcel location, Town of
Vail zoning designation, geologic/floodplain hazard
status, parcel acreage and other pertinent informa-
tion. A LOA "code" has been assigned to each parcel
which indicates the Task Force's recommended
action for the property (i.e. USFS conveyance to the
TOV, TOV to consider purchase, etc.).
The task force has described the "Desired Future
Condition" highlighting recommended results to
achieve within the next 10 years.
A. That there be no National Forest System
lands within the municipal limits of the
Town of Vail.
B. That the U.S. Forest Service survey, identify,
and maintain the common boundary of the
Town of Vail and the U.S. Forest Service and
that both agencies share in the enforcement
of regulations pertaining to the boundary.
The boundary has been simplified where
possible, irregularities have been reduced or
eliminated.
C. That all land exchanges and purchases opti-
mize both local and national public benefit.
Conflicts with local interests are recognized
in the decision making process of all land
exchanges and purchases, and all efforts are
made to address and minimize those con-
flicts.
D. That all lands acquired by the Town of Vail
are used for public purposes such as open
space, public housing, recreation or for the
resolution of unauthorized uses.
E. That the Town of Vail, Eagle County, or the
U.S. Forest Service acquire all privately
owned tracts, parcels and previously unplat-
ed lands adjacent to, and outside of, the com-
mon Town of Vail and National Forest
System boundary. These lands are trans-
ferred to the National Forest System, Eagle
County, or the Town of Vail where joint
objectives are satisfied.
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
F. That public access to National Forest System
lands be maintained or improved. New
access points meet Town of Vail and U.S.
Forest Service objectives.
G. That National Forest System lands within the
study area that are encumbered with aban-
doned uses, unauthorized uses, or infrastruc-
ture related facilities are reduced or eliminat-
ed.
H. That the Town of Vail and National Forest
recreation opportunities are jointly planned
and integrated.
I. That all unincorporated, platted residential
areas within the study area are annexed
within the municipal limits of the Town of
Vail.
J. That the wood fiber production emphasis
management area (7E) that is adjacent to the
Town of Vail as identified in the Forest Land
and Resource Management Plan be replaced
by a recreation emphasis prescription.
K. That new developments are discouraged on
private lands that exist outside and adjacent
to the Town of Vail.
The next step in the LOA process is formal adoption
of the LOA plan by both the Forest Service, in the
form of an amendment to the Forest Plan, and the
Town of Vail, as part of this Comprehensive Open
Lands Plan. Once the plan has been adopted, the
TOV and USFS will proceed with transfer and/or
acquisition of lands and adjustment of the
TOV/USFS boundary line according to a preestab-
lished priority list.
Lionsri'dge I ��
Buffehr Creek
% o�
o�
44P 4q �®o Q d
O.419
4 4
�tDas �Schone I 3 o�
Vail Heights
a C2) 5 ;
Intermountain
Comprehensive Open Lands Plan
Status of Actmion Plan Parcels and T -
q
b
9 Town of Hall, Colorado
Q
p
D
fl d� p 0
�4� p�Q o ❑
-' Booth Creek 33
Potato
Sandstone 15 a
Patch p ra delle;
a _ r
Creek - o
35
14
0 0
Pi tk
ee
Crei
rnwN of va' ii%
December 15, 2015
Miles
0 0.5 1
01
a
0
Bighorn
Creek
Bast
Vaii
OLP Action Plan
Summary of Action Items
Action
Item Parcel Description
Parcel Number
Current Ownership
Zoning
Action Item
Objective
Recommended
Action
Priority
1
Lot 14, Block 9, Vail Intermountain
2103-143-01-044
EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT
Two -Family P/S Residential
Trails
Obtain easement
High
2
Section: 14Township: 5 Range: 81 PCLIN NE1/4NW1/4
2103-142-00-001
L. LADNAR INC
Outside Town Boundary
Protect sensitive land
Aquire parcel
Low
3
Subdivision: HIGHLAND MEADOWS TRACT C
2103-141-03-018
MPH HOMES LLC
Outside Town Boundary
Trails
Obtain easement
High
4
Subdivision: VAIL HEIGHTS FIL 1 Lot: 9
2103-114-01-042
LANNIE, PAUL ANTHONY & DONNA DEAN
Two -Family P/S Residential
Community use
Acquire parcel
High
Subdivision: VAIL HEIGHTS FIL 1 Lot: 10
2103-114-01-029
ST MORITZ LLC
Two -Family P/S Residential
Community use
Acquire parcel
High
Subdivision: VAIL HEIGHTS FIL 1 Lot: 11
2103-114-01-028
ST MORITZ LLC
Two -Family P/S Residential
Community use
Acquire parcel
High
5
Subdivision: BUFFER CREEK RESUB Lot: 32
2103-123-02-010
BRUCE H. ALLEN REVOCABLE TRUST- ETAL
Two -Family P/S Residential
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
6
Subdivision: HIGHLAND MEADOWS FIL 2 Lot: 32-C
2103-123-23-003
HIGHLAND HEIGHTS OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Outside Town Boundary
Trails
Obtain easement
High
7
Subdivision: BUFFER CREEK RESUB Lot: 9 THRU:- Lot: 12
2103-123-02-001
VAIL HOTEL OWNER ESHV LLC
Public Accomodation-2
Community use
Acquire parcel
High
8
Subdivision: TIMBER VAIL Lot: 1
2103-123-29-001
RANCH CREEK DEV LLC
Single Family Residential
Wildlife
Acquire parcel
Low
9
Section: 1 Township: 5 Range: 81 PCLIN
2103-014-00-005
SHAPIRO CONST CO PENSION PLAN
Agricultural and Open Space
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
Low
10
Section: 6 Township: 5 Range: 80 PCLIN
2101-063-00-002
POTATO PATCH GROUP LLC
Residential Cluster
Trails
Obtain easement
High
11
Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 2 TRACT A
2101-064-07-011
EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT
Outdoor Recreation
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
12
Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 Block: 5-E Lot: K PART O
2101-082-04-005
VAIL CORP
Public Accomodation
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
13
Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 5 TRACT E PART OF
2101-082-42-011
VAIL CORP
Agricultural and Open Space
Trails
Obtain easement
High
14
Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 5 Block: 2 Lot: D-1
2101-082-42-004
VAIL CORP
Agricultural and Open Space
Trails
Obtain easement
High
15
Subdivision: GOLDEN PEAK SKI BASE AND RECREATION DISTRICT PARCEL PARCEL 1
2101-081-09-006
VAIL CORP
Ski Base/Recreation
Trails
Obtain easement
High
16
Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 8 Block: 2
N/A
THE PULIS RANCH
Outdoor Recreation
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
17
Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 12 Block: 2 Lot: 1 PART OF BK -0228 PG -0740
2101-023-01-028
PEAK SERVICE REALTY
Low Density Multiple -Family
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
Low
18
Subdivision: BIGHORN 2ND ADDITION Lot: 1
2101-111-01-001
CHLOE HELD MORAN REVOCABLE TRUST
Two -Family P/S Residential
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
19
Subdivision: BIGHORN 2ND ADDITION Lot: 5
2101-111-01-003
CHLOE HELD MORAN REVOCABLE TRUST
Two -Family P/S Residential
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
20
Subdivision: BIGHORN 2ND ADDITION Lot: 8
2101-111-01-022
CHATEAU-D'OEX LLC
Two -Family P/S Residential
Trails
Obtain easement
High
Subdivision: BIGHORN 2ND ADDITION Lot: 10
2101-111-01-020
MARILYN E. COORS REVOCABLE TRUST
Two -Family P/S Residential
Trails
Obtain easement
High
Subdivision: BIGHORN 2ND ADDITION Lot: 12
2101-111-01-021
AHCO 27 LLC
Two -Family P/S Residential
Trails
Obtain easement
High
21
Subdivision: BIGHORN SUB Lot: 19 AND:- Lot: 20-A PT OF RESUB OF LOT 20
2101-122-18-002
BIGHORN MUTUAL SANITATION & RECREATION CO
Agricultural and Open Space
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
22
Section: 12 Township: 5 Range: 82 PCLIN
2101-123-00-006
BEUTEL, CARA
Agricultural and Open Space
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
23
Subdivision: BIGHORN 3RD ADDITION Block: 5 Lot: 1 THRU:- Lot: 3 PT OF
2101-122-00-002
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
Outdoor Recreation
Sensitive land, comm. use
Acquire parcel
High
24
Section: 12 Township: 5 Range: 80 PCLIN BK -0216 PG -0514 WD
2101-123-00-007
TIMBER FALLS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
Low Density Multiple -Family
Trails
Obtain easement
High
25
Subdivision: DISTELHORST SUBDIVISION Lot: 2 TRACTS A & B
2101-124-34-001
FREDERICK W. DISTELHORST REVOCABLE TRUST
Medium Density Multiple -Family Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
Section: 12 Township: 5 Range: 80 PCLIN
2101-124-00-017
RACQUET CLUB OWNERS ASSOC
Low Density Multiple -Family
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
Section: 12 Township: 5 Range: 80 PCLIN SEI/4
2101-124-00-003
RACQUET CLUB OWNERS ASSOC
Low Density Multiple -Family
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
DESC: TRACT I Subdivision: RACQUET CLUB TOWNHOMES CONDO
2101-124-24-012
RACQUET CLUB OWNERS ASSOC
Low Density Multiple -Family
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
26
Section: 12 Township: 5 Range: 80 PCLIN SEI/4
2101-124-00-008
MOUNTAIN MEADOW CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INC
Residential Cluster
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
High
27
Section: 13 Township: 5 Range: 80 SW1/4NE1/4NE1/4 PCLIN
2101-131-00-001
DUANNE F. ROGERS REVOCABLE TRUST
Outdoor Recreation
Protect sensitive land
Acquire parcel
Low
28
Unplatted
1945-012-00-012
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
No Zoning
Road Access
Acquire parcel
Low
29
jUnplatted
2203-171-00-001
USFS
Outside Town Boundary
Trails
Acquire parcel
lHigh
Town of Vail
Real Estate Transfer Tax
The Town of Vail Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) is the Town's primary funding source for park and open space land acquisitions.
RETT imposes a 1% land transfer tax upon the transfer of interests in real property. RETT was adopted by ordinance 1979 and was
amended in 1980, 1987, 1992 and 2006. Below is a summary of RETT and amendments that have been made since 1979.
Ordinance 26. Series 1979
• 1% Land Transfer Tax to be paid upon transfer of all real property.
• Sale or conveyance of real property for purpose of constructing low or moderate priced housing exempt from Tax.
• 1% consideration shall be earmarked for acquisition of real property located either within or without the limits of the Town
of Vail.
• Funds shall be subject to appropriation only for the purposes of acquiring land for parks, recreation, open space and/or
similar purposes.
Ordinance 5. 1980
• Many refinements to Ordinance 26, Series 1979
• Addition to appropriation of funds to include "paying incidental costs and principal and interest on any borrowing for the
acquisition."
Ordinance 8, Series 1987
• No increase to the 1% tax rate without such tax rate increase is approved by a majority of the registered electors voting in a
regular or special election.
• Appropriation of funds expanded to include the cost of construction of buildings which are incidental to park, recreation and
open space land, including paying incidental costs and the principle of and interest on any borrowing of such improvement
and construction.
• Appropriation of funds may be used for acquiring land located within the Town of Vail or contiguous to the town boundary.
Ordinance 10, Series 1992
• Appropriation of funds within the Town of Vail or within one mile of the boundaries of the Town of Vail.
• Funds shall be appropriated for the following purposes:
o Acquiring, improving, maintaining and repairing real property for parks, recreation, open space and similar purposes,
o The construction, maintenance, and repair of buildings which are incidental to park, recreation, and open space land,
o Landscaping parks and open space,
o The construction, maintenance, repair and landscaping of recreation paths set forth in the Town of Vail Recreation
Trails Plan, and
o Paying incidental costs and principle of and interest on any funds borrowed for the purposes set forth above.
Ordinance 31, Series 2006
• Appropriation of funds expanded to include supporting sustainable environmental practices as determined necessary for the
environmental health and welfare of the Town of Vail.
• Intent of amendment that appropriation of funds for acquisition of lands, construction and maintenance of incidental
buildings, landscaping and construction and maintenance of trails to be satisfied prior to appropriation of funds for
sustainable environmental practices.
NEPA and EIS process for new trails located on USFS lands
The following steps generally outline the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
process, which new trails located on USFS lands would be analyzed under.
1. Official "Project Proposal Letter" (PPL) containing proposals from the Conceptual Trails Plan submitted by Town of
Vail to USFS
• PPL submitted by Town of Vail to the USFS.
2. USFS Evaluation of PPL and Proposal Acceptance
• PPL reviewed for consistency with the Forest Plan, USFS Direction, and Open Lands Plan.
• Based on predicted environmental impacts, the USFS determines the level of NEPA that would be necessary to analyze the
proposal (including a Categorical Exclusion (CE), an Environmental Assessment (EA), or an EIS).
• An EIS is the highest level of site-specific NEPA review and would be anticipated for a proposal containing numerous trails as
outlined in the Conceptual Trails Plan. Individual trail proposals, re-routes, or maintenance may fall under a CE or EA.
• Project proposal accepted by USFS.
3. Proposed Action Development
USFS Interdisciplinary Team (ID) Team resource specialists work with the Town of Vail to develop Proposed Action, project
design criteria, and mitigation and monitoring measures to minimize environmental impacts.
4. NEPA Process Begins: Public Scoping Period (Public Comment Opportunity)
• Scoping Notice, including project purpose and need and description mailed to the public and agencies.
• Scoping period initiated when the Notice of Intent is published in the Federal Register.
• Public has opportunity to present comments on the project specific website and/or in writing, by fax, by email, or in person.
• Public Open Houses are held during scoping period (the opportunity for the public to be informed of the project proposal, ask
questions, and submit comments).
5. Preparation of Draft EIS
• Based on comments received during the scoping period and review by the ID Team, a "reasonable range of alternatives" as
required to NEPA is Developed to be analyzed in the Draft EIS.
• Studies and analysis, including field surveys, are conducted to prepare the Draft EIS
• Technical reports are prepared, including Biological Assessment submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7 Requirement.
• Draft EIS is comprised of the Purpose & Need for Action, Description of Alternatives, Affected Environment, and
Environmental Consequences, as well as mitigation measures to minimize impacts to resources.
6. Draft EIS Comment Period (Public Comment Opportunity)
• Draft EIS is delivered to EPA to publish the Notice of Availability for public comment in the Federal Register, which initiates
comment period.
• Document provided to federal, state, and local agencies and organizations, and interested members of the public for a 45 -day
public comment period.
• Comments received during Draft EIS comment period by agencies and the public help further refine and strengthen the
analysis.
7. Response to Comments and EIS Finalized
• USFS drafts responses to public comments and issues the Final EIS.
8. Preferred Alternative Determined by USFS
• Preferred Alternative is chosen by Decision Maker.
• Preferred Alternative can be any alternative in its entirety, including the No Action, or a combination of alternatives.
9. Publication/Issuance of Final EIS and Draft ROD
• USFS completes Final EIS and Draft Record of Decision (ROD)
• If objections are received, a 45 -day objection review period begins. If no objections are filed, issue decision on or before fifth
business day after close of objection period.
• If objections are filed, decision issued after all objections have been responded to in writing.
• Implementation possible of proposed trails from the Conceptual Trails Plan possible after decision is signed.
Trail Types and Standards
The trails included in this plan are designed for a variety of user
experiences and purposes. Each type of trail is therefore subject to
a different set of standards and practices that will best
accommodate the users on that trail. Multi -use trails should be
wide enough to accommodate the many users and user types
sharing the trail, while soft surface trails should be designed to
provide natural experiences. There are a different set of standards
for bicycle facilities that share the road or have a dedicated space
separated from the road. This section describes each facility type so
that readers can get a clear understanding of each term. It also
describes the standards Vail uses for that facility type and in what
context it is appropriate -
Hard -Surface Trail Types
The Town of Vail has many hard -surface or paved facilities for
pedestrians and cyclists. These facilities provide safe routes along
roadways and between homes and local destinations. The hard -
surface facilities are categorized as either separate/buffered from
the road or within the roadways. Separated facilities include
sidewalks, separated multi -use paths (Gore Valley Trail through
Katsos Ranch), and attached multi -use paths (Gore Valley Trail
along the frontage roads). Paved shoulders (along the Frontage
Roads) and shared lanes (residential areas) are considered within
the roadway. The Town of Vail follows the American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials' 2012 Guide for the
Development of Bicycle Facilities which offers guidance on facility
widths, pavements and layout of the system.
PAVED TRAIL
DR FACILITY
:D
SEPARATED OR WITHIN ROADWAY
BUFFERED FROM ROAD
SLDEWALK
_C
PAVED
SHOULDER
SEPARATED
MULTI -USE PATH
ATTACHED
MULTI -USE PATH
SHARED
ROADWAY
Sidewalks
Sidewalks are pedestrian facilities located along
roadways in both residential and commercial areas.
They separate pedestrians from the roadway, creating
pedestrian safety and comfort. They are most common
in areas with heavy vehicular traffic. Sidewalks can be
attached - separated from the roadway by the curb, or
detached - separated by a landscape planting strip or
buffer zone. Sidewalk widths are between 5-10'. Wider
walks are encouraged in busier areas.
Attached Multi -Use Trails
Similar in design to a sidewalk, attached multi -use trails
are used in areas with limited right-of-way or space for
a separated trail and where the town's recreation trail
system runs along the roadway. Attached multi -use
trails are paved and between 8'-10' wide. They are
typically curb -separated from the frontage roads.
Though they look similar to sidewalks, they are wider
and open to cyclists like a separated multi -use trail.
Separated Multi -Use Trails
Separated multi -use trails provide safe routes away from
motor vehicles and are common in Vail's paved system -
Multi -use trails are used by pedestrians, cyclists,
dogwalkers, strollers, commuters, as well as fat bikers
and Nordic skiers in the winter. Typically paved with
asphalt or concrete, the trails offer an accessible
recreational experience. In Vail, these trails connect
neighborhoods to local destinations such as Vail
Village, the library, and local parks. The Town of Vail
requires these trails to have a 10' wide paved surface
with a ]'gravel shoulder on either side. In heavily
trafficked areas, the trail may be up to 1 Z' wide.
NO
Sidewa/ks andAttachedMu/ti Use Trails are
typica//y curb separated or gutter- separated with
a minimum width of 5' and up to 10'
Image source: FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal
Networks Guide
V,71%sAttachedMu/ti-Use Trails are attachedat the
back ofa 6"curb with a width of 10' A widened
shoulder adacent to the curb/gutter is typical.
Image source: FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal
Networks Guide
Horizontal Clearance Shared Use Path Shoulder
z k (o.s �) io-Sz ft (s.o-as m) z ft (o.6 m)
Separated Multi Use Trails are typically between 10-
12'in width with 1'gravelshoulders on each side
Image source: FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal
Networks Guide
Paved Shoulders
Paved shoulders are used on Vail's frontage roads to
safely accommodate pedestrians and cyclists in the
roadway. They also extend the maintenance life of a
roadway and provide additional space for parked
vehicles. In Vail, these shoulders are 3'-6' wide and
carry pedestrians and cyclists in the same direction as
motor vehicles. Share -the -Road signs may be used to
protect users. Adding striped shoulders to some of
Vail's residential areas could help accommodate
pedestrians and cyclists and calm traffic.
Shared Lanes
All streets and roadways, unless prohibited by law,
permit use by both bicycles and motor vehicles. Cyclists
generally prefer to ride on lower volume roadways.
On busier roadways or designated bike routes, a
bicycle with chevrons (commonly known as a
sharrow) is stamped on the roadway to welcome
cyclists and improve safety. The placement of sharrows
depends on the street's parking arrangement — on the
edge of the roadway for wider streets with parallel
parking and closer to the center on narrow streets
with angled parking.
Roundabout Safety
Roundabouts present a challenge for pedestrians and
bicycles. Appropriately placed crosswalks and
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) can safely
assist users through the roundabout. Placing
crosswalks at the access roads to the roundabouts
avoids the limited view drivers have through the
roundabout. RRFBs further alert drivers to crossers and
have been shown to improving driver's yielding
compliance. Signs that encourage cyclists to "Take a
Lane" as a vehicle help improve visibility and let drivers
know cyclists may be present.
Paved Shoulder Buffer (Optional)
1.5 4 ft (0.5 1,2 m) orw±der
Pavedshouiders have a 4-6'recommended
minimum width but with an outside curb may be
narrowed to 3'
Image source.- FH WA Small Town and Rural Mutt{modat
Networks Guide
Typical "sharrow"iayoutper MUTCD
! "0
6_1T6St7*6_
MAY USE
FULL LANE
Soft -Surface Trail Types
Soft -surface trails are naturally surfaced, narrow trails that generally follow the natural contour of the land. In Vail, soft -surface trails can be
found on the valley floor, along the lower reaches of mountain -sides and up into the higher elevations that surround the Town- Soft -surface
trails should be designed to be sustainable with gentle grades and a natural contour that limits the impact to the environment.
Most existing and proposed soft -surface trails in the greater Vail network are on Forest
Service land. As such, these trails are subject to USFS trail standards. The Forest Service
publication Trai/Fundameutalsand Trai/MauagemeutObjectivesprovides trail
definitions, classes, recommended design parameters (widths, grades, clearances, etc.)
and management objectives. The publication can be found on the U.S. Forest Service
website (www.fs.fed.us).
In general, non -motorized Forest Service trails are considered multi -use (hiking,
equestrian, biking). Trails within designated wilderness areas, such as the Eagles Nest
Wilderness, are designated for hiking and equestrian use only. In non wilderness areas,
trail design can be used to encourage use by specific user -groups. For example,
narrow, steep trails are more likely to be used by hikers whereas trails with banked
turns or technical sections may be preferred by mountain bikers.
When looking to improve or expand Vail's trail system, efforts should be made to
provide trails for all user types and abilities using general standards as outlined below.
Trail Design
When designing new trails, adopting non -sanctioned trails or recommending
maintenance on existing trails, trail design standards should be used based on the
proposed use of the trail. Per the USFS, the following general trail standards are
recommended. The standards would be further refined by trail difficulty.
Soft -Surface Trail Design Standards
Trail Use
General Standards
y�
Hiking Trails
In Vail, hiking -only trails are found in the
Tread width: 12-36"
_
Eagles Nest Wilderness and within the Vail
Corridor width: 48-72"
Mountain trail system- Hiking -only
Ave grade: <10%
designations are recommended for several
Max grade: 15-20% for less than 100'
trails in the Conceptual Trails Plan -
Multi -Use Trails
In the Vail area, all trails on Forest Service land
are designated as multi -use unless otherwise
Tread width: 28-48"
_
indicated by a Wilderness designation or a
Corridor width: 60-84"
resort Special Use Permit- Many of the
Ave grade: < 10%
proposed trails are also expected to
Max grade: 15-20% for less than 100'
accommodate multiple user groups- These
trails should be wider than hiking -only trails to
accommodate passing-
Mountain Biking Trails
In Vail, the mountain biking -only trails are
Tread width: 18-48"
exclusively within the Vail Resorts Special Use
Corridor width: 60-84"
Permit on USFS lands- While not part of the
Ave grade: < 10%
Plan recommendations, it is possible that
Max grade: 15-20% w/ frequent grade
some new trails, in the Lost Lake Loops for
reversals and potential banked turns
r
example, could be designed as more+
favorable to mountain bike use-
-'`
Trail Difficulty Rating System
The U.S. Forest Service regards trails as Class 1 through 5, with Class 1 as highly variable and unimproved (difficult) and Class 5 as highly
improved with little variability (easy) and varies the Classes based on the "Trail Designed Use" such as hiking, biking, motorcycling, etc. The
International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA) uses a system based on the International Trail Marking System used by ski areas rating trails as
green -blue -black -double black.
Since most trails in the Vail network would be considered non -motorized and multi -use, this Plan recommends a rating system based on Easy,
Moderate, Difficult trails by combining aspects of both the USFS system and the IMBA system. As Vail is a ski destination, it is recommended to
follow the ski Trail Marking System to rate trails as green, blue, black or double black. Considerations when rating a trail will include surface
type, stability and smoothness, tread width and grade and trail length.
Additional standards should be applied according to trail use type as shown on the previous page..
Surface
Tread Width
Platform Width
Average Grade
Tread Smoothness
Paved, compacted
No obstacles or
Easygravel
or compacted
>36
>48"'
<5%
obstacles less than Z"
natural material. Firm
tall.
and stable.
Natural compacted
Avoidable and
Moderate
m
material, some rock
Z4-36"'
>48"'
<10%
unavoidable obstacles
surface. Mostly stable
less than 6"' tall
slightly variable
Natural material, rock,
Avoidable and
Difficultloose
gravel. Variable
12-24"
Z4-48"
< 15%
unavoidable obstacles
stability
up to 18" tall
Additional standards should be applied according to trail use type as shown on the previous page..
Other Trail Uses
Electric Assisted Bicycles
Electric Assisted Bicycles (EABs) or "E -bikes" are growing in popularity across the country and are used by both commuters and recreationalists.
In Colorado, e -bikes are allowed anywhere that a traditional bike is allowed, including paved recreation trails, unless otherwise restricted by the
local municipality. Currently, e -bikes are not allowed on soft -surface USFS trails unless the trail allows motorized vehicles. In Vail, e -bikes are
encouraged as a way to reduce vehicle traffic, promote healthy outdoor activity and to provide opportunities for less fit or older bikers who
might otherwise have difficulty with the steep terrain and high altitude. As their popularity increases, Vail should remain vigilant in regards to
safety and over crowding on the recreation trail system.
Trails on Snow
Vail's trails are covered in snow throughout the winter. There are opportunities for skiing,
snowshoeing, and fat biking on the snow-covered trails. Conflicts between user groups such as
fat bikers and cross-country skiers arise when there is discord in speed between users, limited trail
width to accommodate user "footprints," and the varying desires of grooming standards for snow
covered trails. The Nordic Center trails will be opened to fat biking during the winter. The Gore
Valley trail between Donovan Park and Lionshead is open but not maintained during the winter.
The Gore Valley Trail between Sunburst Lane and East Vail is part of the Nordic Center.
Rugged Accessible Trails
Rugged Accessible Trails are wide, accessible trails that provide natural and
rugged trail opportunities to a wider range of users. These trails are
accessible to handcycle and mobility assisted users, and are user-friendly for
beginning mountain bikers and large group hiking. Since handcycles are
powered by the riders' arms versus legs, these recreational ists need newly
adapted trail systems. The following design standards should be applied:
3'-5' tread width
6'-1 Z' corridor width
Average and maximum grades should be lower than multi -use trails
To Piney
\ Courage
\ Ridge
MIl4VRN
w
CONCEPTUAL TRAILS PLAN/TRAILS DROPPED FROM CONSIDERATION
Two Elk Trail
Existing Trails
Trail Ideas and Suggestions
New Paved Paths
Potential Children's Bike Facilities
in Phase II
Creek
nector
1
1
I
I
I
1
2017 Open Lands Plan - Update 1 69 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
Bowman's
Short-cut -
5 _
>-
Noxi
2017 Open Lands Plan - Update 1 69 1 Chapter 4 - Trails
COLORADO
Parks and Wildlife
Department of Natural Resources
Glenwood Springs Service Center
0D88 Wildlife Way
Gienwood Springs, CC 81601
P 970.947.2420 1 F 970.947.2936
Peter Wadden
Watershed Education Coordinator
Community Development -Environmental
Town of Vail
Peter,
March 6. 2317
As per your request I have put together what information the Colorado Parks and
Wildlife have available to provide you with as much guidance as passible on the
sustainability of wildlife populations within the Gore Valley. As we discussed over the
phone it is very difficult to break out wildlife information on small areas. Using the
available information I have tried to make as specific as possible to the Gore Valley.
Part of the problem is the Gore Valley is covered by 2 different game management units
(GMU), GMU 36 on the north side and GMU 45 on the south side.
For road kill information I have put together the information for 3 years (2014-2316). It
is important to remember that road kill data is very preliminary since many animals are
able to get away from the highway before dying and are never counted. Also Colorado
state law allows for the public to possess certain road killed animals and often these
animals are picked up before they are counted. You will also notice that many small
mammals are not even mentioned as there is no data for them. This information is
attached below.
The number of bears that are removed or put down by CPW due to human/bear
conflicts is very dependent on weather patterns and public perceptions. I again used
data from 3 year (2014-2016). 1 don't have the data for the number of calls the Vail PD
took on bear complaints for this period but I believe you can get these from the PD.
2014 CPW put down 2 bears in Vail.
2015 and 2016 no bears were removed or put down.
I used the same years for lion conflicts. Lion conflicts have really become an issue the
in the last 2 years. Prior to 2015 1 might get 5-10 calls per year about the public seeing
Bob D. Bn>scheid, Director, Colorado Parks and Wildife •Parks and Wildlife Commirion: Robert W. bray • Jeame Home C.
John Howard, Vice -Chair • Dale Poet • James Pribyl, Chair • James Vfipt • Dean YrirkgFeld • Mich etke 2immemian, Secretary • Alex Lipp
_ia `.•
lions in or around the Town of Vail with most of these being just the public reporting a
sighting. However in 2016 1 received 18 calls within the Town of Vail and 2 of these
were for dogs that were killed by lions. Many of these calls were about the public
encountering lions while out with their dogs and concerns that their dogs were at risk of
being attacked by the lion. In 2016 CPW did remove and put down 1 lion from the Town
of Vail.
Deer and Elk
CPW conducts annual big -game classification flights to determine age structure, sex
ratios, reproductive success, and population estimates for each data analysis unit
(DAU). These DAUB cover large geographic areas, and trying to extract information at a
much smaller scale drastically decreases the accuracy of the estimates.
A drawback to using historical count data to estimate impacts on wildlife is the amount of
confounding variables that influence a species at the population level. Examples include
weather, disease, population management at the DAU level for big -game species, and
development/human disturbance. These factors can increase the difficulty of defining
impacts by using animal abundance before and after development.
It is becoming increasingly apparent to wildlife and land managers that human
disturbance to wildlife in the form of recreation is taking a toll on wildlife and on habitat
by reducing functionality. In areas experiencing high levels of recreation, animals tend
to spend less time foraging and resting and more time traveling. Mountain biking and
ATV use may create the highest levels of disturbance for mule deer and elk (Naylor et
al. 2008). Behavioral changes such as these occurring in summer range habitat may
result in an overall decrease in animal fitness, which often negatively affects
reproductive success and winter survival.
Examples of these within the Gore Valley are the request for additional biking and hiking
trail from Spraddle Creek to Booth Creek, the Vail Trail expansion on the south side of
the Gore Creek, the increase in summer activities on Vail Mtn., the request for the
expansion of Gold Peak racing area and the overall push to make the valley a full 4
season recreation destination.
Elk
Fortunately for elk we have a current study done in Game Management Unit (GMU) 45
from 1995 to 2005 that looked at impacts on elk calving/recruitment from human
disturbance. For the elk populations I put together some information using baseline
information we have from the elk study done in the Eagle Valley from 1995 to 2005.
This study was done in GMU 45 and was to determine impacts on elk calving from
human disturbance, (Phillips and Alldredge 2000, Shively et al. 2005). The study done
at Beaver Creek and Vail demonstrated that calf/cow ratios for elk declined by
approximately 40% (from 64.6 calves per 100 cows to 39.8 calves per 100 cows) as a
result of human induced disturbance during the calving season (Phillips and Alldredge
2000, Shively et al. 2005). Reproduction levels during the treatment period were
determined to be insufficient to maintain a stable elk population. The second half of the
study involved removing the human disturbance component. With the human
disturbance removed the calf/cow ratios rebounded to their pre treatment levels.
We used the radio collared elk and age and sex ratio counts done from helicopter to
determine the elk population in GMU 45. The baseline years were 1994, 1996, 1997
(1995 counts were not used because the flight time was reduced by approximately
50%). These are the 3 years that we have Lincoln indexes, which provides us with 3
years of data to obtain an average on the % of the population we actual count during a
flight. The average % of the population we counted based on these 3 years is 41.8%.
During this period (1994 to 2015) we have had the same observer (except for 2013) and
have had relatively the same number of flight hours each year (from 3.5 to 4 hours).
The average population for the 3 years of baseline (1994, 1996, 1997) was 1771 elk.
The average population for the last 3 years is (2012, 2013, 2014) was 604 elk.
That is a 63% drop in population levels (1167 less elk). From 1998 to 2015 there has
been 13 years that we have been below the baseline population level. The
classification counts for 2013 and 2014 (162 elk) and 2015 (149 elk) were the lowest
counts since 1975.
Deer in GMU 45 and 36.
We are not as fortunate with deer as we don't have any current studies to provide
Lincoln indexes for the % of the deer population we count during aerial age and sex
ratios. So I used harvest data. The Data Analysis Unit (DAU) for deer is D8 and it
covers Units 35, 36, and 45.
Harvest GMU 45
From 1955 to 1962 the harvest went from 205 deer to 500 deer respectively with 1962
being the highest harvest (500) ever in GMU 45. The harvest has never again hit 500
deer.
From 2010 to 2014 (1 am missing 2013) the harvest went from 60 deer to 127 deer
respectively. This is confounded by the fact that we now have totally limited deer
licenses now.
Harvest GMU 36
From 1955 to 1962 harvest went from 553 deer to 1947 deer respectively, with 1962
again having the highest harvest of 1947 deer. The harvest has never again hit 1947
deer.
From 2010 to 2014 (1 am missing 2013) the harvest went from 157 deer to 318 deer
respectively. Again like GMU 45 this in confounded by total limited deer limited
licenses.
But if you compared those periods there has been greater than a 3 fold reduction in
deer harvest in BGU 45 and up to a 6 fold reduction in deer harvest in GMU 36 since
1962.
The DAU plan for D8 has shown a steady decline in population since the 1980's. For
most of the 1980's the DAU population objective was 26,000 deer, in 1988 it was
reduced to 21,000 deer and in 2008 it was reduced to 13,500 to 16,500 deer. These
population objectives were reduced based on several factors (loss of habitat, increased
recreation pressure, weather, predators and quality of habitat).
In the early 1970's Colorado Division of Wildlife researcher Dale Reed completed a
study looking at the impact of 1-70 on deer migration at Mud Springs {just east of Dowd
Jct.). There was a concrete box culvert placed under 1-70 to provide a migration route
for deer. The study on the Mud Springs deer underpass showed about 39% of the Mud
Springs deer population failed to pass through the underpass.
Below is some information from a 1975 report on deer impacts from the start of Vail.
Land use changes in the form of rapid increases in human in -habitation, activity and the
construction of 1-70 in the Eagle Valley have contributed to a substantial decline in deer
numbers. The extent of this reduction is best expressed by changes in numbers of deer
harvested in the two periods, 1959 to 1963 and 1969 to 1973 and comparison of these
changes with those of the state as a whole.
The percentage decrease in the annual deer harvest in Eagle County between the two
time periods was greater than that for the State as a whole, 52.8% and 47.8%,
respectively. During this time, the Eagle County contribution to the State's deer harvest
declined from 6.2% to 4.6%, and Eagle County's ranking dropped from an average of
5th place to 6th. It is also interesting to note that the decline in the number of deer
harvested was greater in Game Management Unit 45, 63.7%, than for any other unit in
Eagle County. GMU 45 includes Vail Village, the Vail Ski Area and many related
developments, nearly all of which have been developed subsequent to the 1959-63
comparison period.
Bighorn Sheep
There is only one population of bighorn sheep in the Gore Valley. An important part of
the winter range for this herd is within or adjacent to the Town of Vail and 1-70 in the
east Vail area. This herd is considered a native herd although there was a transplant of
7 sheep done in 1948. In the 1950's the population was estimated to be 30, in the
1990's the population was estimated to be 80-100; the current population estimate is
40. The population has not recovered since the hard winter of 2007-2008. The reasons
for the lack of recovery are not clear cut. There are numerous factors that could cause
this; disease, lack of winter habitat, poor quality habitat from the lack of habitat
management (no fires), predators and increased recreation pressure. We have not
detected any increase in disease. Whatever the cause, the populations has been
unable to rebound from the winter 2007-2008.
Mountain Goats
There is only one population of goats in the Gore Valley. This herd spends its time far
above the boundaries of town really does not use habitat adjacent to the town of Vail.
However the population for this herd has been in decline for the last 4-6 years.
Moose:
The moose population in the Gore Valley (and all of Eagle County) has been increasing.
Moose started showing up regularly in the Gore Valley around 1983. This increase was
a result of moose moving from the North Park area. Moose have the ability to winter in
much greater snow depths than do deer or elk, plus moose are able to utilize forage of a
larger diameter. Moose also are not as prone to being disturbed by human activities as
are deer and elk. Moose are more willing and able to stand and even defend their turf
from human disturbance than are deer and elk. These factors combined have allowed
the moose population to increase. However these same factors may be the same
reasons that the moose population is close to reaching its "political" capacity as calls on
moose in yards, town, or on recreation trails increase and there is a greater push by
some to reduce the moose population because of these conflicts.
Peregrine Falcon:
Peregrine falcons have established at least one nest site within the Gore Valley in the
last decade. The nest site has been fairly well buffered from human activities that
could impact its success. However the increase in hiking, biking trails along with the
increasing pressure to further develop the ski area for summer recreation could impact
the success of this nest.
Black Bears
Black bears have seen an increase in their population over the last 2 decades. The
development of the Gore Valley has resulted in an increase in food sources and limited
the impact from fall berry crop failures on the recruitment of bear cubs. Human trash,
pet food, bird feeders, and planting of fruit producing landscaping have significantly
increased the available food sources for black bears especially during critical periods.
Some would consider this to be a success while others would not. The increase of
human induced food sources has resulted in numerous bear/human conflicts. Although
the conflicts have not resulted in any serious human injuries they have resulted in the
death of numerous bears over the last 20 years (this includes road kill).
Mountain Lions:
Mountain lions have seen an increase in their population levels over the last decade.
As with bears part of this increase in lion population can be linked to an increase in
available prey species caused by the development of the Gore Valley. The same food
sources mentioned in the section on black bears play a role in providing food for lions.
The populations of raccoons, red fox, marmots, and various species of small mammals
have increased from this boost in food availability due to human development. Along
with the increase in human population, the population of household pets (cats and dogs)
has increased. Lions have utilized household pets as another food source. This has
resulted in an increase in human/lion conflicts. Although the conflicts have not resulted
in any serious human injuries they have resulted in the death of several lions over the
last 10 years (this includes road kill).
Gore Creek:
I think you have a fairly good picture of Gore Creek from all of the recent studies the
town has been doing. As a fishery the lower half of Gore Creek is holding its own and
still has all four species of trout. However as the studies the done by the town on Gore
Creek show the creek is in trouble and without significant improvements in the overall
health of the creek the fishery could easily decline. The upper section of Gore Creek
and Black Gore Creek are not doing as well and could be further impacted from
proposed improvements to 1-70 on Vail Pass.
The possibility of the greater impact to Gore Creek is probably more related to weather
patterns and the need for additional water for human use and snowmaking. Changes in
weather patterns and runoff events could easily have the most significant long term
impact on the watershed. The push to increase recreational events on Gore Creek and
to manipulate the stream channel to allow for additional recreation activities or to extend
the season of use could all have significant impacts on the ability of Gore Creek to
function as a quality fishery.
Is the Gore Valley sustainable for wildlife?
I am sure there are other species that could be discussed but the data to provide
defensible comments on these species is lacking.
You first have to define what sustainable is when it comes to wildlife. Is it having a
token population or is it having a robust population? Does a population in decline
qualify? If the human/wildlife conflicts continue and wildlife is always the loser even on
public lands is that sustainable?
I don't see the wildlife populations in the Gore Valley as sustainable with the current
level of development, recreational, and conflict pressure placed on wildlife. The species
that are increasing generally have adapted to living next to people. These same
species also generate extensive complaints from the public about human/wildlife
conflicts or damage to property. Recreation is a driving economic force in Gore Valley
and the surrounding communities. Theses recreational activities occur throughout the
year and there is a push to increase recreational activities within the Gore Valley. As
these demands for recreational opportunities continue to grow they result in higher
impacts on natural resources, and potential increases in habitat fragmentation. Quality
wildlife habitat includes food, water, shelter, space, and connectivity, which is critical to
maintaining healthy wildlife populations. Large blocks of contiguous habitat are most
likely to promote the long-term sustainability of a species. Habitat becomes fragmented
as land use changes break the landscape into smaller more distinct "patches." These
patches may not provide fundamental habitat requirements resulting in a diminished
carrying capacity for the species across the landscape. Wildlife living within fragmented
habitat is more vulnerable to stochastic population declines stemming from disease,
increased rates of predation, or habitat loss or modifications.
Most wildlife managers agree, with support from the scientific literature, that recreation
has the potential to impact wildlife distribution and abundance (Goldstein et al 2010,
Naylor et al. 2008, Keller and Bender 2007, Taylor and Knight 2003, Papouchis 2001,
Joslin and Youmans 1999, Valdez and Krausman 1999). The "zone of influence" (ZOI)
of recreational activities for wildlife may extend for some distance beyond the actual
activity and will vary depending on habitat composition, topography, and a species'
tolerance of human disturbance. I have attached an example of an analysis CPW did
for the Town of Avon showing the impact from the development of a biking and hiking
trail. Has you can see from Figure 1 the development of 3 trails in the Metcalf drainage
results in the loss of the entire drainage as effective mule deer habitat with just a 100
meter buffer on the trails. When you look at Figure 3 & 4 for elk at 500 and 1500 meter
buffers you see the impacted area is substantial. You could run a similar analysis on
the trails within the Gore Valley.
When you review the discussion on deer; elk and bighorn sheep populations in the Gore
Valley there is nothing on the horizon that is going to allow us to significantly increase
those populations. These populations have been in decline for at least the last decade
and often longer. The ability to do large scale habitat improvement projects for big
game is becoming increasing difficult. Part of the issue is often the best habitat project
is a controlled burn. As the residents in East Vail showed in the mid 1990's they have
no stomach to have a controlled burn done behind their homes. The project to improve
and increase the winter range for bighorn sheep was killed because they were unwilling
to consider a controlled burn no matter how many fire trucks were available to protect
their property in the event of the fire coming down hill.
The demand within the Gore Valley for federal lands is overwhelming, whether it is to
acquire them for employee housing, develop recreational trails in every drainage, add
new commercial recreational events or to develop a four season resort with every type
of recreational activity imaginable. All these uses impact wildlife and there is very little
thought on how it will impact the available wildlife habitat or wildlife populations. The
desire to manipulate the natural conditions in order to extend the ski and rafting season
has a significant impact on wildlife. As we discussed in the Avon analysis, stress and
behavioral changes are often not considered when looking at wildlife impacts. Just
having habitat is not enough the habitat must be available and useable for wildlife.
With the continual decline in most big game species within the Gore Valley over the last
36 years there is little reason to assume that this pattern will change to the point where
you would consider these population to be sustainable and/or robust in perpetuity.
If you need anything else please feel free to let me know.
Sincerely,
Bill Andree
District Wildlife Manager - Vail
t,
i 7�
y
ri
�_ �� irk �i■■Li h'7
1 �
►■■■■■■■■■■ON
- ..,
-
1 IIC mU ag fu age um cm
70
If
1100m Area of Influence for Mule Deer
-P
0.100
N ll
'000-
y
FA
Min turn
7'WO Elk r:raek
Content may not reflect National Geographic's current map
DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI
Area of Influence for Mule Deer
(Taylor & Knight 2003)
Conceptual Trails
- 100m Area of Influence -Pedestrian
MMule Deer Migration Corridors
C3Mule Deer Concentration Area
0 0.5 1
Miles
Bighorn Sheep Seasonal Habitats - 390m Buffer
m
USFS & TOV Trails Data
Status, Surface, Manager
Existing - Hard Surface
Existing - Managed by TOV
Existing - Managed by USFS
C3Big horn Prod uctionArea
C3BighornWinterConcentrationArea
esBighorn SevereWinterRange
BighornWinterRange
Existing - Managed by Vail Resorts C3BighornSummerRange
— Existing - Managed by ? - 390m Area of Influence
Conceptual - Managed by TOV
Conceptual - Managed by USFS 0 0.25 0.5
Miles
1390m Area of Influence for Mule Deer
1114
r9
LA
Min turn
el.
TWp 10
£Ik d"l
Content may not reflect National Geographic's current map
DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI
Area of Influence for Mule Deer
(Taylor & Knight 2003)
Conceptual Trails
- 390m Area of Influence - Mechanized
Mule Deer Migration Corridors
C3Mule Deer Concentration Area
0 0.5 1
Miles
1500m Area of Influence for Elk (Pedestrian Buffer)
f
1
I
Ntu
i
•II
Content may not reflect National Geographic's current map
DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI
Area of Influence for Elk
(Wisdom et al. 2005)
Conceptual Trails
- 500m Area of Influence - Pedestrian
C3Elk Production Area
C3Elk Severe Winter Range
03Elk Winter Concentration Area
C3EIk Winter Range
>ol 0 0.5 1
Miles
i
nS�
I
Ntu
i
•II
Content may not reflect National Geographic's current map
DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI
Area of Influence for Elk
(Wisdom et al. 2005)
Conceptual Trails
- 500m Area of Influence - Pedestrian
C3Elk Production Area
C3Elk Severe Winter Range
03Elk Winter Concentration Area
C3EIk Winter Range
>ol 0 0.5 1
Miles
1500m Area of Influence for Elk (Mechanized Buffer)
c
ON—
Twa r1h lrepk
Content may not reflect National Geographic's current map F
DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, Ems, METI,
Area of Influence for Elk
(Wisdom et al. 2005)
Conceptual Trails
-
1500m Area of Influence - Mechanized
C3Elk Production Area
C3Elk Severe Winter Range
03 Elk Winter Concentration Area
C3 Elk Winter Range
0 0.5 1
Miles
SE GROUP
MEETING MINUTES
P❑ Box 2729 1 323 West Main St. Suite 201 Frisco, CO 80443
Office: 970.568.3398 1 www.seorouo.com
DATE: 09/07/17
PROJECT: Trails in Vail
SUBJECT: Community Sooping Session #1
LOCATION: Vail Community development Building
ATTENDEES:
Name
Role
Tom Vucich
Community Member
Blondie Vucich
Community Member
Pete Seibert
Community Member
A Vision for Trails in Vail:
The participants seek a deliberate, limited trails plan for Vail. They want to improve the
connectivity, congestion, and diversity of the existing system but don't believe that Vail can be
all things to all people. The group envisions combining modest updates to the trail system with
increased reliance on the regional network of trails. They suggest constructing a pilot trail in a
non -controversial location before embarking on phase 2 of trail building.
Safety
Mitigating user conflict is a large concern for the group. They worry that attracting more people
to Vail with an improved trail system would increase conflict.
Sustainability
The participants want the trails in Vail to maintain their natural character. They are concerned
that overuse on existing trails is disturbing the environment. Some participants are
apprehensive about new trails that would detract from Vail's pristine natural environment. Also
concerns with soft -surface trails adjacent to existing paved trails as being redundant.
Accessibility
The participants raise numerous issues with the accessibility of the trail system. They have
concerns with trail parking, providing a wilderness-esque experience for users, and accessibility
for elderly, children, and beginning mountain bikers.
Diversity
The participants all feel Vail needs a greater diversity in the ability level of its trails. Given that
mountain biking is a popular summer activity, the town needs a novice mountain biking trail
(North Trail is overly technical). For the aging population, walking trails of beginner ability level
are in high demand. One participant envisions Vail as a mountain biking community, requiring a
substantial expansion of the trail system.
Connectivity
The participants desire greater neighborhood access to local trails. They suggest smaller
neighborhood trails rather than a large end-to-end trail connection. In building new trails, the
town should focus on areas where there are not trails to provide greater access to the trail
network.
Work Session
Participants mentioned the following options for trails:
• Intermountain social trail as viable soft surface option
• Supportive of Intermountain to Lionshead Trail.
• Some participants were not in favor or formalizing the Vail Trail (easements, private
property, USFS land) and felt it should be left as is.
• Felt that the East Water Tank Trail was too steep as is for an '`easy" trail.
Social Trails
Some are opposed to adoption of the social trails to prevent overuse by visitors.
SE GROUP
MEETING MINUTES
P❑ Box 2729 1 323 West Main St. Suite 201 Frisco, CO 80443
Office: 970.568.3398 1 www.seorouo.com
DATE: 09/12117
PROJECT: Trails in Vail
SUBJECT: Community Sooping Session #2
LOCATION: Vail Municipal Building Conference Room
ATTENDEES:
Name
Role
Ellen Miller
Community
Member
Michael Hand
Community
Member
Diane Johnson
Community
Member
Mike Moser
Community
Member
Amv Parliament
Community
Member
Axel Wilhelmsen
Community
Member
A Vision for Trails in Vail:
The participants want to prioritize maintaining existing trails and improving signage and
environmental design before embarking on new projects. They are largely concerned with poor
trail diversity and connectivity but are hesitant to build new trails to resolve those problems.
Most are onboard with adding soft surface trails in the Town of Vail but recognize the obstacles
to building easy soft -surface trails given the town's topography.
Safety
Participants express concerns about user conflict on trails with hikers and bikers but recognize
the difficulty in establishing many rules with a significant visitor population. Some mention needs
for safer lanes along roadways for pedestrians and bikers, especially for local children (East
Vail, Aspen Road crossing 1-70, Piney Road).
Sustainability
Participant with experience in trail building stresses the unsustainability of Vail's trail system.
The steep grade of the trails makes them challenging to maintain and unsuitable for many of the
visitors. Participants see making the Buffehr Trail more rideable with switchbacks as an
opportunity for a sustainable trail. The group wants to protect the forests' gems as Vail Resorts
mountain beoomes "Disneyworld."
Accessibility
Participants voice a great need for more signage on Vail trails. Multiple participants bring up the
Gore Valley Trail as incredibly difficult to follow particularly through East Vail. Better signage
could warn of potential conflicts with wildlife and other user types.
Diversity
Participants want trails for a variety of user types, ability levels, and lengths. One participant
wants to make the Vail Trail a walking or ly trail and suggests new, easy, soft surface walking
trails to make "valuable gems" accessible to elderly and children. Others complain about lack of
easy mountain bike trails in Vail and the difficulty of exposing young riders to the sport here.
Some suggest that mountain biking networks are better suited for down valley towns, places
with mo•e families and more forgiving topography. Turning various trails into loops would spread
out riders and allow riders to customize ride for given day.
Connectivity
Participants are frustrated with the difficulty of accessing and connecting local trails and
locations in town. They want more convenient trail access points for hiking. biking to friends'
houses, and trips to the market. Many in this group favor soft surface trail opportunities adjacent
to paved trails. For visitors, participants want tourists to feel connected to Vail through greater
opportunities to experience its natural beauty and interpretive signs that explain the history and
features of the town.
Work Session
Participants mentioned the following options for trails:
• Trails with coexisting hard and soft surface
• Trail up Bald mountain that leaves right from town as hiking only
• Lost Lake area as a potential soft surface trail area
• Adjacent path next to Piney Road to access the spaces up there
• Connection to Davos Road
• Increasing public access in Spraddle Creek Ranch for trails
• Making the Buffer trail more rideable and sustainable by creating switchbacks
• The North Trail, near Sandstone, is incredibly steep, forcing people to turn around. By
improving the grade. more trail users would make the loop, reducing bottlenecks.
• Creating short soft surface loops by Beaver Ponds (Katsos Ranch area) that are easily
accessible from paved paths
• A spot near the berms as a great place for a small pump track or flow track and is near a
bus stop
■ Concerns with mountain bike activity near the Memorial Park
■ This group has trail building and maintenance experience for many years and feels they
can be a resource in the future
Social Trails
Participants have conflicting attitudes on the social trails. One participant believes residents are
properly taking care of the trails and does not think the Forest Service would seize them.
Another hopes Vail's demand for trails could be fulfilled with other trails, leaving social trails for
locals. In opposition. another thought the social trails could alleviate the overuse on official trails.
Participants ask Gregg whether the town could maintain social trails and he calls it feasible.
s sEGR0uP
MEETING MINUTES
P❑ Box 2729 1 323 West Main St. Suite 201 Frisco, CO 80443
Office: 970.568.3398 1 www.seorouo.com
DATE: 09/12117
PROJECT: Trails in Vail
SUBJECT: Community Sooping Session #3
LOCATION: Vail Municipal Building Conference Room
ATTENDEES:
Name
Role
Alan Danson
Community
Member
Pam Stenmark
Community
Member
Andy Forstl
Community
Member
Kim Newbury
Community
Member
John -Ryan Lockman
Community
Member
A Vision for Trails in Vail:
The participants want Vail's trails to be a great town amenity to meet the hiking demand from
guests and locals. Yet they recognize that Vail cannot be a trail mecca and must take
advantage of regional assets. With trail improvements, participants believe that the priorities
must be accessibility and connecting trails to town to alleviate parking and overcrowding issues.
Safety
Participants present user conflict on existing trails as a significant issue. One participant
expresses an immediate need to make Vail Trail pedestrian only because "mountain bikers are
scary." Participants mention dogs and electric bikes on the Gore Valley Trail as an additional
concern. A participant offers Whiskey Creek Trail in Minturn as an example of a trail with
minimal conflict. Lack of safe biking routes to school are also a major concern.
Sustainability
Participants worry about the environmental impact of new trails. They prefer improving
maintenance of existing trails and keeping the trail system close to the valley floor to minimize
environmental impact. Most participants deem soft surface trails parallel to hard surface trails
wasteful and hard on the environment.
Accessibility
Participants believe increasing signage and trail information would alleviate trail overcrowding
and confusion. As possible solutions, they mention readily provided detailed trail maps,
information about nearby trails at frequently crowded trailheads, and better education for hotels
and websites about the variety of trails in the area. Consistent signage between the town and
resort could improve connectivity and disperse visitors. Additional wayfinding, educational, and
trail etiquette signs are inexpensive options.
Diversity
Participants express interest in greater trail diversity to alleviate current overcrowding. They
suggest more (or greater awareness of) intermediate and accessible trails to minimize crowding
on Booth Falls trail. Despite the town's sleep topography, participants still feel that the town
must provide greater options for families.
Connectivity
Participants want greater connectivity between town trails. residential areas in Vail. and nearby
towns. By connecting biking and hiking opportunities to bus stops, people could park centrally
and access more trails, reducing congestion on trails and in parking lots. Participants suggest
greater continuity between Vail Mountain trails and town trails because visitors don't
conceptually separate the two. A participant working in a local hotel calls connectivity incredibly
important to guests, as seen in the popularity of the Berrypicker Trail that begins in Vail Village.
Multiple participants mention trail connectivity with nearby towns as practical and a potential
draw like the Rio Grande Trail that connects Glenwood Springs to Aspen.
Work Session
Participants mentioned the following options for trails:
• Maintenance on the Matterhorn trail, largely a skiing trail, could open it to hiking
• The Spraddle Creek trail, near the hotels, needs better maintenance to become a hiking
trail
• A loop trail for hotel guests above 1-70 on town land behind school as an accessible
option
• Extending Bald Mountain trail to be an in -town hiking option
• Pump track at Donovan Park
• Trail for East Vail heading up the mountain
Social Trails
Participants are in favor of adopting the social trails. They see it as an untapped resource to
disperse tourists. The Water Tank Trail could be a nice place for East Vail residents to walk.
SE GROUP
MEETING MINUTES
PO Box 2729 1 323 West Main St. Suite 201 Frisco, CO 80443
Office: 970.568.3398 1 www.seorouo.com
DATE: 09/14/17
PROJECT: Trails in Vail
SUBJECT: Community Scoping Session #4
LOCATION: Vail Community development Building
ATTENDEES:
Name
Role
Pete Coe
Community
Member
Brian Rodine
Community
Member
Matt Carroll
Community
Member
Sid Roman
Community
Member
Nancy Rondeau
Community
Member
Bill Hoblitzel
Community
Member
A Vision for Trails in Vail:
The group has a very strong pro -trails vision and great frustration with hurdles to the trail -
building process. The participants are enthusiastic about the idea of a soft surface loop trail
through the town to improve safety and connectivity. They envision the loop trail dramatically
opening up options for midday walks, runs, and rides. Some believe Vail can be a mountain
biking mecca with a well-maintained, diverse system while others recognize a lack of potential
full-day opportunities.
Safety
The group has safety concerns on all types of thoroughfares in town. Participants find roadway
biking, especially in the roundabouts, incredibly dangerous. On the Gore Valley Bike Path,
headphone use and dogs on long leashes are making the route a "nightmare" for commuting
cyclists. Soft surface trails also have user conflict between bikers and hikers and more
separation of user groups seems necessary.
Sustainability
The group wants a sustainable trail system but has frustrations with environmental hurdles.
They are interested in employing a town trail crew, like Breckenridge, to better maintain the
system and minimize disturbances. They are concerned with diminishing wildlife habitat and
roadkill but do not want wildlife considerations to be the sole consideration in designing a trail
system. Some complain about the approval of development projects in wildlife habitats while
trails, with far lesser impact, are rejected. Others suggest building wildlife corridors overlunder
the interstate as a trade-off for building new trails.
Accessi vilify
The group has some minor concerns with the difficulty of following the Gore Valiey Trail and
suggest better signage and striping.
Diversity
Participants, especially those directly involved with the tourism industry. state a serious need for
more intermediate/beginner soft surface trails. Those trails could offer a natural tour of the valley
for visitors wanting a mountain experience. Those soft surface trails could also offer another
commuting route for locals. a route to school for kids, and easier trails for older residents.
Some believe that terrain is not the obstacle to a diverse trail network, as other towns overcame
their topography with funding and commitment. Towards funding, they suggest using more town
tax dollars on the trail system.
Connectivity
The lack of connectivity of Vail's trail system is the participants' primary complaint. One
threatens to leave Vail if the system did not improve. The group makes frequent comparisons to
the connectivity of soft surface rec paths in other towns (Crested Butte, Telluride. Steamboat,
Santa Fe). Those trails offer frequent access points to homes, schools, parks, and shops. The
participants were all in favor of a valley loop trail with many feeder paths to villages. They also
suggest a bike path to Minturn and more trails down from Vail Mountain to curb driving to hiking
and biking excursions.
Work Session
Participants mentioned the following options for trails:
• The Matterhorn Trail — needs more maintenance as it is largely washed out and could
use more switchbacks
• Better connector to existing trails from Stephens Park
• New loop trail sufficiently elevated to be away from the interstate
• Rely on the mountain to build easier trail loops
• Trail down from Two Elk Trail to East Vail
• Connector trail to Booth Creek trailhead from Vail Village
Social Trails
The group supports adopting the social trails and is frustrated with people who oppose adoption
because they don't want to share their trail.
s sEGR0uP
MEETING MINUTES
P❑ Box 2729 1 323 West Main St. Suite 201 Frisco, CO 80443
Office: 970.568.3398 1 www.seorouo.com
DATE: 09/18/17
PROJECT: Trails in Vail
SUBJECT: Community Sooping Session #5
LOCATION: Vail Community development Building
ATTENDEES:
Name
Role
Anne Esson
Community
Member
Diana Donovan
Community
Member
Ernest Saeger
Community
Member
Joe Hanlon
Community
Member
Matt James
Community
Member
A Vision for Trails in Vail:
The participants, considering the town's financial constraints and crowding on existing trails, do
not agree on whether new trails are appropriate for Vail. All participants are concerned with the
environmental and wildlife impacts of new trail developments and want new trails to be
sustainable and minimize such impacts. The group agrees that Vail cannot be a trails
destination but a strong trail system should be an amenity for locals and visitors. The group
largely believes that the Town must lead the system improvement because the resort has little
incentive as the trail system does not bring in revenue. Overall, they believe that Trails in Vail
must be a strategic process that fills system gaps rather than builds haphazardly.
Safety
The group is concerned with congestion, user conflict, and potential accidents on crowded bike
paths and roundabouts. They suggest better signage, public education on trail etiquette, and
potential bypasses of busy intersections. The participants also have concerns about e -bikes,
though none feel it is an immediate problem in Vail. They worry about a -bike riders going too
fast, riding where they are unprepared, and degrading the trail surface.
Sustainability
Sustainable trails are of prime importance to this group. Participants want the trails in the
system to be at a lower grade to make it easier and cheaper to maintain trails. Considering new
trails, they suggest soft surface trails given their lesser environmental impact. They believe a
natural style trail design could be Vail's signature. The group also agrees that seasonal closures
will be necessary for any new trails over the next 10 years. Some participants oppose new trail
construction at all because of wildlife considerations.
Accessi vilify
The participants had few concerns about the accessibility of the trails themselves but believe
that better signage and education could improve everyone's trail experience. To make the trails
accessible and enjoyable for riders and hikers, they suggest signs explaining rules of the trail
and involving bike shops to educate unfamiliar riders.
Diversitv
The participants largely want to make Vail a better place to ride and walk for beginners,
children and older users. Participants, especially the parents in the group, complain about the
lack of easy trails for those user groups. Easier paths could also divert congestion from existing
trails like the Gore Valley Trail and Booth Falls Trail. Participants express interest in a pump
track as those in other towns are incredibly popular with children and families. One participant
criticizes using children to justify new trails.
Connectivity
The participants feel that new trails must be designed to improve connectivity of the system.
There is interest in the loop trail from the 1994 Open Lands Plan as it connects the entire town.
Given that the 1994 plan is largely unfeasible, participants suggest making smaller connections
and loops in town to reduce congestion.
Work Session
Participants mentioned the following options for trails:
A diversion trail to keep people away from Memorial Park
• A connector loop trail around town
• A connector trail between Davos and Avon
• A trail for East Vail
• North side trail between Middle Creek and Booth Creek
• Improving the sustainability of the Buffehr Trail
• Soft surface connection between Lionshead and Intermountain
• Open to the idea of a novice trail loop on the upper bench of Donovan Park
From: Shelley Bellm
To: Chris Neubecker; Kristen Bertualia
Subject: FW: VHA/JFL/SB: Shelley - Could you forward this to the PEC for consideration.
Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 4:17:40 PM
Attachments: imaae001.ona
For Open Lands Plan comments.
Shelley Bellm
Office Manager
Community Development Department
TOWN OF VA19Li
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Office: 970.479.2325
vai Igov. com
GREAT
PLACE
TO
OR Wr
CERTIFIED
pO74X.p{Y3.1 f r
4 {.5
From: Jim Lamont [mailto:]FLamont@Vail.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 7, 2018 9:14 AM
To: Shelley Bellm
Subject: VHA/JFL/SB: Shelley - Could you forward this to the PEC for consideration.
Shelley: Could you forward the below to the PEC for their consideration, if they have yet to
sign off on the Open Lands Plan amendment. Thank you. Jim Lamont.
From: James Lamont [mailto:lamontvail(a)yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 7, 2018 10:03 AM
To: James Lamont
Subject: Fw: Fwd: Re: Fwd: VHA/JFL/BOD: Please review - Update new articles on status of Open Lands
Plan amendments
On Friday, April 6, 2018 9:07 PM, johnlohre. wrote:
Jim, this from Kathryn Middleton, our daughter makes sense to me. John
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: kathryn middleton
Date: 4/6/18 7:52 PM (GMT -07:00)
To: John Lohre
Subject: Re: Fwd: VHA/JFL/BOD: Please review - Update new articles on status of
Open Lands Plan amendments
Hi Dad,
The Vail Trail is a beautiful trail that sees only moderate use. I agree that it should
stay that way. There are steep sections in it for the more hardy, otherwise the
tourists should just use the existing bike path. They (the tourists) have enough other
options around, plus they can enjoy it for what it is if they're so inclined. We would
recommend it to snow shoers when I ran the Nordic center. It's eastern section was
also nice to teach kids how to mountain bike when I helped coach Vail Mountain Bike
Camps. If it's mainstream it will lose its serenity.
Love,
K
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE:
ITEM/TOPIC: April 9, 2018 PEC Results
ATTACHMENTS:
File Name Description
Pec results 040918.pdf April 9, 2018 PEC Results
0 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
TOWN OF VA10 April 9, 2018, 1:00 PM
Town Council Chambers
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
Call to Order
1. 1. Present: Brian Gillette, Rollie Kjesbo, Ludwig Kurz, Karen Perez, Brian
Stockmar
Absent: Pam Hopkins, John -Ryan Lockman
1.2. Rollie Kjesbo, Ludwig Kurz, and Brian Stockmar were sworn in as members
of the Planning and Environmental Commission.
1.3. The PEC agreed to postpone the election of a Chair and Vice -Chair until a
meeting with more commissioners present.
2. Main Agenda
2.1. A request for review of variances from Section 12-15-2, GRFA Requirements 45 min.
by Zone District, Section 12-15-3 Definition, Calculation and Exclusions,
Section 12-18-4 Uses, and Section 12-18-5, Density Control, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Title 12 Chapter 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow
for Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) in excess of the amount permitted
by lot area and zone district and to allow an access opening to a crawl space
of greater than 12 square feet, located at 2014 West Gore Creek Drive Unit
5/Lot 41-43 (Hamlet Townhouses), Vail Village West Filing 2, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC18-0009)
Applicant flolly Proctor and John Hutto, represented by Martin Manley
Architects
Planner: Chris Neubecker
Neubecker began by summarizing the proposed project and
the comments from the previous time the item appeared
before the PEC on March 26, 2018. In response to the
comments the applicant has proposed changes to the
previously submitted plans. The changes include: a
reduction of the storage area head height to less than five
feet (6) so that the previously requested gross residential
floor area (GRFA) variance is no longer necessary. The
applicant is still requesting a variance to allow for an entrance
to the storage area greater than twelve (12) square feet.
Staff still believes that the request does not meet all of the
criteria for a variance as there is nothing specific about the
site that warrants special consideration. Therefore, staff
recommends denial of the application as proposed.
John Martin, Martin Manley Architects, asked for clarification
as to the term "hardship" and then introduced the unit owner,
Holly Proctor.
Kurz —Asked for clarification on why a 24 square foot
access door is necessary as opposed to the 12 square feet
allowed by the Vail Town Code.
Holly Proctor, applicant/owner, summarized the previous
variance requests and the changes that have been made
since the previous appearance before the PEC. She stated
that since the last meeting she has discussed the variance
criteria in more detail with staff. She believes that the
requested variance for an access opening greater than twelve
(12) square feet does meet the second criteria. Specifically,
she believes that the strict interpretation of the Code does
prevent her from the same benefits as other properties in the
Town. To her, the Two -Family Primary/Secondary
Residential (PS) District designation creates a hardship.
She believes the proper zoning classification for her property
is Residential Cluster (RC), which would allow for the project,
as proposed, due to the allowed 250 Addition. She thanked
Commissioner Gillette for his suggestion to look at the
possibility of accessing a storage area through the existing
garage. She recalled to the PEC the difficult path she has
had over the last fifteen (15) months in trying to get her
project approved. She asked if the PEC could still consider
granting a GRFA variance.
Stockmar —Asked Proctor when she purchased the
property. Proctor responded that two separate units were
bought in 2006 and 2010. Stockmar followed up by asking
Neubecker when the zoning district was designated.
Neubecker responded that the property was designated
Primary/Secondary (PS) in 1985. Stockmar asked about
the cost differences between different concepts.
Neubecker asked Perez to clarify her status on potential
conflicts of interest, and if she would recuse herself from
reviewing this item. Kurz suggested that it was up to
Commissioner Perez to determine if there might be any
conflict of interest. Perez asked if the GRFA variance was
still up for review. Ms. Proctor confirmed that she would still
like the GRFA variance to be considered. The Board
discussed potential conflicts of interest, and Ms. Perez
indicated she did not believe there was a conflict. The Board
indicated that it is up to the individual Commissioner to
determine a conflict.
Gillette —Asked for clarification as to the definition of
crawlspace. Neubecker stated that the characteristics of a
crawlspace are discussed within Section 12-15-3, Vail Town
Code. Gillette believes staff is misapplying the Code in this
instance. Gillette asked for an explanation on the difference
between a crawlspace and a shed, as he believes the
proposal is not for a crawlspace and therefore the variance
for a twelve (12) square foot access opening is not relevant.
Neubecker — Stated that if the applicant were correct in her
statement that the property has been zoned incorrectly, the
proper method to resolve this issue would be through a
rezoning request.
Kurz —Asked Gillette to clarify his statement that the variance
should be for GRFA and not a crawlspace opening.
Stockmar — Suggested tabling the item in order to restructure
the request.
Gillette — Staff did not include the purpose of the zoning
regulations title in the staff memo. He believes that the
purpose of the title should be included in future staff memos,
but also believes there are conflicts within the te)d of the
purpose. Neubecker asked for clarification. Gillette stated
that the purpose of the overall zoning regulations title, the
purpose of the specific zone district, and the purpose of
GRFA should all be included within the staff memo.
Kjesbo — Stated that twelve (12) square feet may be too small
for a crawlspace entrance, but a 24 square foot opening is
excessive.
Kurz — Stated that he agreed with Kjesbo that the size of the
requested variance seems excessive, but there is some
hardship established by the zoning classification. He
suggested that the GRFA variance not be considered and
that the applicant attempt to provide a more modest -sized
crawlspace opening.
Gillette —Asked for a description of the rezoning process.
Neubecker responded.
Stockmar —Asked Ms. Proctor if the zoning issue has been
discussed among the other Hamlet owners. She responded
that almost all of the owners are familiar with the rezoning
process and are all aware of the site restrictions under the
existing PS zoning. He indicated that he is still uncertain as
to whether or not the requested variance is a grant of special
privilege. He suggested it may be worthwhile for the HOA to
pursue a rezoning in lieu of the requested variance.
Gillette —Agreed that a rezoning may be the best approach.
Perez — Asked how the applicant arrived at the request for a
24 square foot opening. Proctor responded that it was based
on various items that she would like to store. Martin stated
that 25 square feet is what is reasonable to accommodate
bikes, etc.
Neubecker stated that a variance should be unique to a
property such that it does not set a precedent. Kurz stated
that it is the appearance of a precedent that concerns him.
Stockmar — The PEC is constrained by the Vail Town Code,
which requires something unique about the property that
would warrant a variance. As the staff memo indicates, there
is nothing unique about the subject property.
Perez —Asked for clarification of the "250 Ordinance."
Neubecker stated that it does not apply to the PS zone
district.
Gillette — Suggested a motion be made
Kjesbo — Clarified his remarks that he believes the Code may
need amending to allow for a larger opening, but does not
believe 24 square feet is a reasonable variance request.
Perez —Asked staff about the alternatives they have
considered and why they did not find anything unique about
the subject property. She believes the incorrect zoning is
what makes the subject unique. Jonathan Spence, Senior
Planner, clarified that the zoning is not incorrect, but rather
was applied with a purpose, despite the fact that it may not
match the existing conditions. Martin responded that at this
time they are unsure if the alternative and removing the
garage wall is physically possible. Gillette made alternative
design recommendations involving the use of a gate.
Gillette — Recommended that the applicant return with a
rezoning request. He asked for staff's opinion on a rezoning
request. Neubecker stated that staff has not yet conducted
the research to form an opinion. Spence elaborated as to
the criteria that would be evaluated in order to make a
recommendation on any rezoning request. Gillette reworded
his earlier statement that approving a rezoning would be a
"slam dunk," but rather that it would be easy to support a
rezoning as long as a corresponding zone district could be
identified.
Kurz opened the meeting for public comment. There was
none.
Kurz encouraged the PEC to refocus on the variance
request before them.
Brian Gillette moved to table to May 14, 2018. Brian Stockmar seconded the
motion and it passed (5-0).
Absent: (2) Hopkins, Lockman
2.2. A request for the review of the following three (3) variances: 1.) a variance 5 min.
from Section 12-21-12, Restrictions in Specific Zones on Excessive Slopes,
Vail Town Code, to allow for more than ten percent (10%) of the total site area
to be covered by driveways and surface parking; 2.) a variance from Section
14-3-1, Minimum Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for more than one (1)
curb cut per unit; and 3.) a variance from Section 14-3-1, Minimum
Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for a minimum horizontal clearance
between a garage door (parallel to road) to edge of public street pavement of
less than 24 feet, located at 2841 Basingdale Boulevard/Lot 3, Block 8, Vail
Intermountain Development Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC18-0012)
This application was withdrawn by the applicant.
Applicant:Michael & Yoshimi Moore, represented by RAL Architects, Inc.
Planner: Matt Panfil
2.3. Report to the Planning and Environmental Commission of an administrative 10 min.
action regarding a request for a minor amendment to Special Development
District (SDD) No. 6, Vail Village Inn, Phases I and 11, pursuant to Section
12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for
modifications to the approved development plan in order to permit three (3)
building additions totaling 149 square feet to commercial Unit 15 to
accommodate increased restaurant seating and a new public entrance,
located at 100 East Meadow Drive Unit 15/1-ot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing
1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC18-0011) (It should be
noted that Public Notice was previously provided for this application as a
Major Amendment, however the scope of the project has been reduced,
resulting in a reclassification of the project as a Minor Amendment.)
Spence informed the PEC that the item would not be heard at this meeting.
Applicant:Gatto Pardo Bianco LLC, represented by Steven James Riden
AIA Architect
Planner: Jonathan Spence
2.4. Motion to Ratify Motions made prior to the Swearing in of PEC Members
Applicant:
Planner:
Karen Perez moved to motion to ratify motions made prior to swearing in of
PEC members. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it passed (5-0).
Absent: (2) Hopkins, Lockman
3. Approval of Minutes
3.1. March 26, 2018 PEC Results
4. Adjournment
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of
Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the
site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission
will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Please call 711 for sign language interpretation 48 hour
prior to meeting time.
Community Development Department
Ad #: 0000221476-01
THIS REM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM DEVLM
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GI N1 the Plonningand
al
Your account number is: 1023233
Environmental Commission of Town of Vail will
hold hearing in dance
a public acco with seo on 1Ml
3-6, Vail Town Cotle, OnAprII 23, 2016 at 1:00 pm
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
In the Town of Vail Munlolpal Building.
DAILY
A request for the review of a Conditional Use Par-
nut,VAIL
licbuild bto uildingsgrounds,or a'ilTow Code,to I.
gs an
STATE OF COLORADO
low for cNature Ce of a yyuun or similar structure lat
Vail Valley
a
the Vail Nature Center, Iwa[en at setting
andt (Ford PEM), antl setting talh de -
COUNTY OF EAGLE
'a'sI"
App In regard thereto. (PEC16-0013)
Of
Applicant? Town of Vall,
Opp..represented by Todc
Planner CM1ds
Chris
I, Mark Wurzer, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council ror an Amendment to the 2013 Ford Park
the VAIL DAILY, that the same daily newspaper printed, in
Master Plan, pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amend -
ment, Vail Tawn Code, to allow for mnstructbn ofa
whole or in art and published in the Count of Eagle,
w building at the Vail Nature Center, located at
841 Vail Valley Driva/Unpla6ed (Ford Park), and sat -
ting fo h details in regard thereto. (PEC16-0014)
State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein,
Opplenheimerown of Vail, represented by Todc
that said newspaper has been published continuously and
Planner: Chris Neubecker
in County Eagle for
Theapplioations and information about to
are illthe l lle for inspection
said of a period of
more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the
�u valine Oevelopme t
Depernuanr, 75 Sou. Frontage Road. The public
I. ted to attend she visits. Please call 970-479-
first publication of the annexed legal notice or
all Mornhall.h. —onllgo . omlplanning oradditlon-
advertisement and that said newspaper has published the
SiN24nhou9notif aGont t-diejtable upon request
requested legal notice and advertisement as requested.
Published Apel 2016 In the Veli Dally.
6,
0000221476
The VAIL DAILY is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every number
of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and
that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of
said newspaper dated 4/6/2018 and that the last
publication of said notice was dated 4/6/2018 in the issue
of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
4/15/2018.
Mark Wurzer. Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and
for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day
4/15/2018.
�1
Jerilynn Medina, Notary Public
My Commission Expires: August 3, 2020
JEr 1 LYA�'i rt4L als�6
rebT,arev;p1lm�.D.
ppTARY'[7:ldSfd09938g'
tl?'/ Cf,Y�;SI�H %'%271lw4AIiGi15T9,2�'
Ad #: 0000227132-01
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM DEVLM
COMMISSION April 23, 2018, 1:00 PM
Town Counoll Chambam
75 S. Frorlla9. ROatl - Vail, Colorado, 8165]
Your account number is: 1023233
1. Call to Order
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
1.1. Election of Chair& Vice Chair
2. sit. Mein
VAIL DAILY
2.1. 841 Vail Valley Drt- - Vail Nature
Center
STATE OF COLORADO
3. Main Agenda
COUNTY OF EAGLE
3'' use Perequestbe en" ns s --.'
Condltion.l Uses; Pubic buildings and grounds,
Vail Town code, to allow for cons[mclion of a yun
t
I, Mark Wurzer, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of
im'lar sirutlure m Vail NS center, lacat-
ad at 841 Vail Valley Driv.1Jnplanetl (Ford PaM),
the VAIL DAILY, that the same daily newspaper printed, in
and eetbng forth datails In regard thereto. (PEC18-
0013)Bo min.
whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle,
Applium: Town of Vall, represented by Todd
OIa neheimerChns Neubecker
State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein,
32. A quest for a ommendation to
m. Vail Town cppn it for an recAmendment to the
2013 Ford Park Master Plan, pursuant to Section
that said newspaper has been published continuously and
12,3] Amentlmem, Vail Town Code, to allow for
uninterruptedly in said Count of Eagle fora period of
p Y Y g p
nstmmlan M a new bu"a ap t the Vail Nature
center, Iodated at B41 Vail Valle Dnvafunp ded
more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the
(Ford Park), and e.tti.g forth d.talle in regard tAe-
" (P" g001d)5_
first publication of the annexed legal notice or
This application has been withdrawn by the appli-
Applleant:
advertisement and that said newspaper has published the
Town of Vail, represented by Totltl
PPP" "eimerChns Neubecker
requested legal notice and advertisement as requested.
A mesi fnr n renomanmntleilnn in
;,a Vail Towryi
n 1, ppmpam tse bn,2-s.T,
,il To
Amendment, Vail Town Code, o9nmining an up-
date to the 1994 Comprehensive open Lands Plan,
and eating forth tleails in mgartl thereto. (PEC17.
0049) 90 In.
The VAIL DAILY is an accepted legal advertising medium,
Applla.nt Town of Vail, mpmaentad by Tom
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Braun, Braun and Associates
Planner: Chris Neubecker& KristenBertuglia
Rule provision.
4. Approval of Minute,
4.1. April 9, 2018 PEC Results
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
5. Adjournment
published in the regular and entire issue of every number
The applications antl information about the propos-
ata avaiaM. br wbli. mi,echpn dpnnW regular
of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and
office hours at the Town of Vail Community awalop-
m t Departmam, 75 Souh Frontage Roed. The
9=dI
that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of
p
pubic a to attend the penial orientation
antl the site visits that precede the public hearing
he Town of Vail Gommuniry DayslopmenI DB
said newspaper dated 4/20/2018 and that the last
panment. Times and order of Items are approxi -
aa, N.R ro jenwgh., d aaa be lied
publication of said notice was dated 4/20/2018 in the issue
up.. to t and Commtissip t time the Planning and
of said newspaper.
ellw711)forgor
information.
Piado�rlnrt
language interpretation 48 hour prior to meeting
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
M.
Community Devebpmant Depart men.
5/4/2018.
Published in the Vell Dally April 20, 2018.
0000227132
/X1 9 ---?\
Mark Wurzer, Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and
for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day
5/4/2018.
Jerillynn Medina, Notary Public
My Commission Expires: August 3, 2020
JEr 1 LYA�'i i�4L"plRd,6
rebTArew pum�.c.
ppTARY'[7:ldSfd69938A'
fi?'/OGbMy;SIDN %'%A71lw4FIiGi15T9,2�'