Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972 Board of Zoning, Appeals and Examiners• TOWN OF VAIL BOARD OF ZONING, APPEALS fINQ MINUTES OF MEETING JANUARY 1 3, 1972 I. Meeting Called to Order A. The meeting was called to order at cipal Building. B. The following members were present: Viele, and Strubie, Ex-officio. C. The following guests were present: and Chuck Ogilby. EXAMINERS 9:25 in the Vail Muni- Messrs. Clark, Hoyt, Messrs. Jim Cunningham D, The minutes of the cast meeting were approved as submitted. 11. 0Id Business A, Case B-I-7{ - Mountain Haus - Mr. Clark asked if the Mountain Haus has complied with the items set forth by the Board at the last meeting. Mr. Struble replied that they are working very hard to get everything done. II1. New Business A. Case Z-16-71 - Apollo Park it -- Request ,for variance per- taining to distance between buildings and setbacks. iNr. Ogilby explained that they wish to measure the distance between buildings from the inside wall, excluding the balconies. This was immediately vetoed by the Board. With this being the case, Apollo Park II is requesting a variance of 6' between buildings I and 2 and 3} between buildings A and I in lieu of 20' as required. Mr. Ogilby feels there is a hardship involved due to a utility easement which runs through the center of their property and also that the landscaping can be made nicer with the proposed building arrangement, The only alternative they will have if the variance is denied is to make buildings I and 2 one building which would be aesthetica~l'ly less pleasing. Mr. Viele stated that he doesn't like to see buildings any closer than 20' because of the fire problEm. in the case of Apolio Park If, fire equipment couid not get between buildings and fire could spread from one building to the other. Apollo Park has also requested a 0 setback at the tract land. Mr. Clark suggested that these two setback variances be considered separately. A motion was made by Mr. Viele that set back variances between buildings be denied and that the set back variance on tract land side be held until another .site plan is presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hoyt and approved unanimously by the Board, B. Case B-I-72 and Z-I-72 - Lions Square I11 - Request for 2' setback at stairs and permission to use spiral stair to serve loft of 160 square feet. Regarding the setback, a motion was made by Mr. Vieie that set back variance be granted subject to door being redesigned. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hoyt. The Board approved the motion unani- mously, and also voted to delay the decision on the spiral ,s .~ _ ~w.y»n%~ .A',6-~?$'S-.vi u.vs .. r ~ ... -.... .. .. . s. s. ..: .. -._, s - .. _ s Page 2 Board of Zoning, Appeals and Examiners Mi"notes of Meeting January !3, 1972 stairs until they have a chance to 4ook at some litera-- ture and same applications, IV, Other Business A. The following contractor's licenses were approved: Airway, inc. Burnett Plumbing and Heating Electrical Bottler Painting Co{orado Tent and Awning Louis Gook Plumbing and Heating Ricf)ard N. Davis Donis Electric . Esser $ Lueth Electric Freund Plumbing and Heating Garfield Roofing Glenwood Masonry Grinell Corporation Gulf Automatic Sprinkler Hi-Land Electric Holy Cross Electric Paul Keller Lavender Drywall and Painting Logan Construction Master Pools Maxwell Heating, Palan Masonry, Inc. Porto-Mix Concrete Shaver Refri gerati on United Lumber Vail Associates, lnc, R, R. Waffensmith Weeden Crane Service V. Adjournment R. Rs there was no other business, the meeting adjourned at 11:05 a.m. Respectfully submitted, TOWN OF VAIL Ed 5truble Ex-officio dw ,. ,,. BOARD OF ZONING, APPEALS RND EXAMINERS MINUTES OF MEETING FEBR(SRRY 10, 1972 I. Meeting Called to Order: R. The meeting was called to order at 9:25 in the Municipal Building. B. The following members were present: Messrs. Clark, Hoyt, Knox, Viele, and Struble (ex-officio). C. The following guests were present: Messrs. Bob McBride, Koppers Company; Chuck Ogilby, Apollo Park; and Jim Cun- ningham, Lions Square. ll.. Old Business: A. Case B-I-72 - Lions Square II, Cunningham Construction and Development - Request for building variance to allow a spina! stairway to serve a loft area greater than 120 square feet. The Board considered this matter at the last meet- ing and did further research on spiral stairs. Mr. Clark stated that if we grant the variance, we would be changing the Ordinance and we cannot do this. Mr. Cunningham feels that our Ordinance is impractical and is encouraging smaller, cheaper condominiums to be built. A motion was made by Mr. Viele that the variance be denied. The motion was seconded by Mr. Knox and disapproved unanimously by the Board. Mr. Clark then stated that he would be willing to go to the Board of Trustees to see if the Ordinance .. can be amended to allow certain conforming types of spiral stairs to larger loft areas, B. Lions Square I problems in obtaining a permanent Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Doors from the corridors to units are nonconforming. The Board recommended that these doors be replaced with conforming .doors and that the panel doors possibly .used in Phase II ar Ill as interior doors. 2. Locking system if bedrooms are rented separately from main unit. The Board recommended that a "break in case of fire" fixture be installed which would con- tain a key to the main unit, which would allow a second method of exit. C. Case Z-16-71 - Apollo Park li - Request for- setback variance at tract land - Mr, Ogilby presented revised drawings to the Board and requested a zero setback at the tract land. Mr. Knox made a motion that the variance be granted subject to adequate .protection be taken that tract land not be damaged, The motion was seconded by Mr. Viele and approved unanimously by the Board. Mr. Struble will require that . rear property line be staked by a registered surveyor. The building may be bui~'t on the property line, but no portion may overhang the adjacent property. D. Rosenquist I and II buildings - R letter was written to Mr. Rosenquist stating that both buildings must be brought up to Code requirements in order that a permanent Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. Work must start by February 18 and be completed within 30 days or the temporary certificates of occupancy will be revoked and the buildings will be vacated. Page 2 Minutes of Meeting February 10, 1972 E. Valley Forge Buil-ding - A letter was written to Mr. Pulis advising him that the remodeling work on his"building musfi be brought up to Code {gypsum board installed over the wooden beams} by May l5, 1972. F, Emporium building - A letter was written to Mr. Hanlon advising him that the beams and overhang that were installed outside his shop must be brought .up to code {5/8" gypsum board installed over beams) by May 15, 1972. III. New Business A. Case B-2-72 -- Lodge Properties request to substitute a heavy timber roof, fire retardant treated, for roof system required by Uniform Building Code for typed and ll con- struction. Mr. Bob McBride of Koppers Company first described the noncombustible treatment that they propose to use on all wood parts of the roof system. Their treat- ment tests 184 degrees higher than normal noncombustible treatment because the wood is pressure impregnated and not just dipped.. Mr. McBride then went on to describe the testing which has been done on the roof system. Mr.. Struble stated that he considers the- roof system to be a safe one. A motion was made by Mr. Knox that the variance be approved with the exception that ventilation be on 2' centers • rather than continuous as shown. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hoyt and app-roved unanimously by the Board. fV. Other Business A. The following contractor's licenses were approved for renews I (. Terrence P. Cowhey and Associates 2. Charles W. Thompson 3. duality Plastering 4. Athey Beaman Company, Inc. 5. Ben Edgin Painting Company, inc. 6. Satchel Sheet Metal 7. Carl and Rockey Becerra 8. Robert L. Newmann 11 9. Alpine Masonry, Ltd. 10. C. A. Stanley Plumbing and Heating 11. A to Z Wome Repair Service 12. Howard Electric Company 13. Boydson Construction Company 14. J, A. Hyder Construction Companyy inc. 15. G. R. Spencer Construction 16. I, & J. Electric Company- 17. Garfield Stucco and Plaster 18. Aspen Construction Corp. 19. PPG Industries, inc. 24. James A. Reinecke, Jr. Const. 21. Dwyer Electric Company 22. Vail Contractors 23, Vail Plumbing Corp. .... _ ._ - Page 3 Minutes of Meeting February 10, 1972 • 24. Snowmass Plumbing and Heating 25. Petersen Associates, [nc. 26. Prestressed Concrete of Colorado, lnc, 27. Loper Electric, Inc, 28. Brent Service - 29. Eagle Valley Roofing 30. Hoy and Grow 31. Powers Construction Company 32. Hamilton Carpet Service 33. Ace Roofing Company, Inc. ~, V. Adjournment - Rs there was no other business, the meeting adjourned at 11:50 a.m. Respectfully submitted, ~'OWNr.OF VR {~. ~~~7 - ! - {~+ . Ed 5truble Building Official (Ex-officio) dw BOARD OF ZONING, APPEALS ANIa EXAM's:NERS MINUTES OF MEETING March 9, 1972 I , Mee-I• i ng Ca I led to Order A. The meeting was called to order at 9:45 a.m. in the Municipal Building. B. The following members were present: Messrs. Clark, Knox, Young, Viele., and Struble (ex-officio). C. Guests present: None. II. Old Business R. Shareholders Recreation:Programs -- The Board agreed with Mr, Struble that nothing was mentioned or approved regarding devia- tion from Section 420 of the Uniform Building Code. B. Lion Square I - The board replied to ,iim Cunningham's letter requesting that he bring in suggestions fior alternate methods with respect to the letter from his architect. C. Rosenquist I and Ii - it was decided that if Mr. Rosenquist has not complied by March 18, it will be turned over to the Town of Vail'Legal Department. Ill. New Business A. Case B-3-72 - Apollo Park - Request far variance to allow roof for less than 7' head height in one area of the loft. A motion was made by Mr. Viele that the variance be approved. The motion was seconded by Mr. Young and approved unanimously by the Board. IV. Other Business A. The fallowing contracl-orts licenses were approved: I. Bickel~Construction 2. Hibberd Canstructian 3, Kendall Electric V. Rd,journment ~- As there was no other business, the meeting was adjo~urne'd at 10:45. Respectfully submitted, TOWN OF VRIL Ed Struble ~ Building Official dw - ~ ~ .,. t; BOARD OF ZONING, APPEALS AND EXAMINERS MINUTES OF MEETING June 8, 1972 I, Meeting Called to Order R. The meeting was called to order at 9:20 in the Municipal Building. B, The following members were present: .Messrs. Knox, Vie1e, Young and Struble (ex-officio). C. The following guests were present: Messrs. Chuck Rosenquist, Dick Brown, Ted Grossman, Mel Sorenson, Bud Lorance, and John Gavin. Ii, Old Business A. Case Z-5-72 - Vantage Point request for IOf setback variance on south property line in lieu of 15~. This setback was discussed at the last meeting and a preliminary variance was granted. Mr. Jim Viele mad a motion that the variance be granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Knox and passed unanimously by the Board. B. LionsHead Centre (Sink Building) -- Mr. Bud Lorance met informally with the Board to discuss -all items which must be corrected before a permanent certificate of Occupancy can be issued by ,the 8uildi.ng Department. Mr. Lorance commenced by giving- the. Board some background on this build- ing which was started in 1969. The building design was started before the property was within the Town limits and was then annexed, The first plan check was made by Mr., Charlie Bynum in August of 1969 at the time of annexation. On September 3, 1969 Mr. Bynum issued the first fetter of non- conformi t i es on th i ~•_p:~:®jeot. There .ensued a d i sagreemen~t between the architect (Mr. Sink) and Mr. Bynum as to the non-conformities. The plans were then sent to I.C.B.O. in November of 1969 which was also returned in November. • Mr. Sink sent his reply to the Town of Vail with a request for a hearing in December of .1969. More information was .sent to I.C,B.O. =u n. December,3and on December 31 a second review was received from I.C,B,O, On January 8, 1970 Mr, Sinn met with the Board of Appeals and many variances were granted. Consfiruc~'ion was termingted an March 31 and Mr, Lorance was retained by legal counsel on April 24, 1970 to review plans in order to solve some of the problems. Work was commenced , again on June 4, 1970 at which time a new building permit was issued as the original permit had expired. In meetings. with Mr. Bynum, Mr. Lorance and he worked out solutions to Some of the problems and a letter was ,jointly written by the two which was dated June 4, 1970 (copy attached). Near the end of the project, Mr. Bynum retired and Mr. Struble made the final inspection so that a certificate of occupancy could be issued, At that time he wrote a letter to Vail Associates d~~hed December 31, 1970 (copy attached). The items on this letter were discussed with the Board so that everything can be reconcfiled and a certificate of occupancy issued, By item: {I) The second stair will be installed from the exit balcony. {2) The windows as installed do comply (Mr. Struble will check). (3) Variance granted on this item on January 8, 1970, Page 2 Board of zoning, Appeals and Examiners Minutes of Meeting - June 8, 1972 {4) This item was accepted by Mr, Bynum in letter of June 4 and Mr. 5truble agreed that it can't be remedied at this time, (5) Same comment as (4). (6) Mr. 1_orance has recommended that this ventilation be installed. (7) This item has been corrected. ($) Variance granted 'an January 8, f970, (91 Has been corrected. (10) Mr. Lorance pointed out that these bathrooms are quasi--public, but he will recommend the instal- lation of tile, (li) .Has been corrected except one hole where there was a frozen sprinkler. (12) Will be covered by a separate building permit when this area is finished. (13) Mr. Lorance will be recommending that this item be installed. (i4) Mr, 5truble will accept this item as is because it is not a health or safety hazard. {i5) Has been corrected, (i6) Variance granted on January 8, 1970, (17) Has been corrected. Mr. Struble fihen stated that he would make a final inspection when it is requested and if all of the items are satisfactorily completed, he will issue a Conditional certificate of occupancy. He does not feel that he can put his signature of a certificate without soma qualifications. 111, New Business A. Case B-~4-72 - Vail 2l application for variance not to con- sider lofts as a story. The architect, Mr. Ted Grossman, presented drawings to clarify Loft area. He feels the units r~ should be considered as single family dwelling since there is fire separation and the occupancy load wilt be low. Mr. Grossman then went on to explain that he had contacted both the Deaver and Rurora building departments concerning lofts and they both permit larger than l./3 floor area with- out requiring the extra exit,- It was the consensus of the Board that the nature of use of a condominium in Vail is much different than that in a large city and that occupant loads tend to be much larger in a resort area, They also pointed out that they as a Board, cannot change the- Code, but can only approve alternate methods of accomplishing the same thing. Mr. Grossman and Mr, Struble differed in opinion an the definition of mezzanine and what is included in the calculation of the mezzanine-area and allowable area. A call was then made to Mr, i<oyamatsu of 1,C,6,0. to clarify this point. it was then determined that they must include. all floor space in the loft area, including the closets and bathroom; and that the area to be used far the I/3 calculation can include only rooms that the soft opens directly onto, those that are 50~ open to that area and-not the bath roams, etc. that Mr. Grossman was using for his calculation, The Board then discussed several solutions to the problem of a second exit from the loft .area, It was the opinion of the Board that some safety precautions were necessary in this " case. R motion was made by Mr, Young that the mezzanines be considered as another story, but that the lofts be allowetl as planned provided that: smoke and heat alarm systems are installed in lofts and that either a sprinkler system or a second door tbu the roof be provided in addition to fihe smoke and heat alarm systems. Mr. Grossman is to inform board _~ Page 3 Bo~'ard of Zoning, Appeals and Examiners Minutes of Meeting - June 8, i972 In writing which afi the two alternatives he plans to use, and also must bubmit revised plans, The motion was seconded by Mr. Knox and approved by the Board with one dissenting vote, B, Case Z-6-72 (Preliminary Hearing) - Bank of Vail request for 7 I/2' setback in front qn Main Vail Road in lieu of 15'. Mr. Mel Sorenson presented the drawings to the Board and explained that the only parts of the building that would project Into the required setback are the planter boxes and a balcony and door canopy. The Board informed Mr. Sor- enson that they will recommend approval of the variance since. there will be at least 50' between the.Bank and any other buildings on that side. C. Case 8-5-72 - (Preliminary Hearing). - Rpollo Park request:to use habitable basement space as laundry rooms and recreation room and not have it considered a story w-hen determining the type of construction. They have agreed to use a concrete occupancy separation between basement and remainder ofi each building and to continue wet standpipes into basement. The l3oard will recommend approval of the variance as there i5 no safety hazard involved. D. Case Z-7-72 - Three Willow Place (Preliminary Nearing) - Request far roof to overhang tract lan~3, Bisiiopfs land and Edelweiss land, and to allow F.A.R, to exceed 1;00 to I:00 by approximately 1~, The Board reviewed .previous variances for this project and noted that 4' setback variances were granted for stair area but that there were to be no pro- jections closer than 4':of the property lines. The other corner of the building in question which has na setback from l~he tract land has not been given a Variance. The Board's position is that we cannot grant the requested variances as it is not within .its power to do so. The Board cannot change the F,A,R. requirement--this must be done by amending the Zoning Ordinance by the Soard of Trustees. The Board cannot ,give permission for a building to encroach upon other's property, 1V. Other Business A. Contractor's licenses approved Submitted by, TawN OF VAI (. BOARD OF ZO G, APPEALS AND EXAMINERS Ed Strub I e ~•'~'~' Ex-Officio dw MINUTBS OF.MB.I=TING BORRQ OF ZONING, APPEALS AND EXAMINERS July 13, 1972 • I. The meeting was called to order at 9:25 a,m, in the Municipal Building. R. The following members were present. Messrs. Viele, Knox, Hoyt and Strub-le (ex~officio). B. The following, guests were present: Messrs. Minger and Robinson, Town of Vaii; Larry Clark, Colin Stewart, Gaynor Miller and Hugh Hyde r, Mountain Haul; Jen Wright and David Sage, representing David Hoffman; Robert Lazier, Lift House; Gordon Pierce, Three Willow Place, Fitzhugh Scott and his residence; Chuck Ogilby, Apollo Park; Jack Catcher, Hilton. Il. Old Business - None Il i. New Business: R, Case 8-6-72 - Mountain Haus - Request for building variance not to install mechanical ventilation in interior offices and laundry room and ~o allow the atrium area to remain as it is. Mr, Minger and Mr. Robinson determined that .this is not a case for the Board of Appals and should be resolved administratively. Mr. Miller and Mr. Clark started by explaining•fihat Mr. Bynum had approved the smoke sensor system as had Fran Bush; in fact they h.ad required it. Mr. Struble is now asking them to remove it and open the atrium area for ventilation. The mechanical ventilation was next discussed. Mr. Ryder stated . that to put in mechanica! ventilation now would be almost impossible and very expensive. Mr. Ryder further stated that he does not consider the laundry room to be unsafe because it is not ventilated. Mr. Robinson and Mr. Minger then stated that they feel the majority of the things on the list of March 10 have been done and there is a point you cannot go beyond and that the problem of no Certificate of Occupancy should be resolved now. They then inquired if Mr. Struble had inspected the Mountain Haus to determine if the items on the list had been completed except for items 5 and 8 for which they are asking a variance. Mr. Struble stated that he had not made such an inspection. Mr. Minger apologized to Mr. Clark and' stated that an inspection would be made immediately to determine what remains to be corrected. Rt that time, Bab McNeill and Kent Rose were sent to the Mountain Haus to inspect the facili- ties, Mr. Clark stated that he has tried- to make the building safe and has spent a great deal of money, approximately $35,000, He further stated that the storage area which does .not have mechanical ventilation will be ventilated at such time the area becomes a commercial space., After Mr. McNeill and Mr. Rose completed the inspection, they reported their findings as follows: ThE attic area has been completed except-for some wiring that needs t.o be installed in conduit; the steel beams coating does not meet the Research Recommendation and should be recoated with Mano-Cote I I/2" thick to meet the requirement. Three layers of 5/8" gypsum board will also meet this require- ment. The fire door has been ordered, but had to be spec€al made because of the type of ,jambs. Since all of the items had not been completed as required, Mr. Minger suggested that Board ofi Zoning, Repeals and Examiners Minutes of Meeting July 13, l972 Page 2 The Town of Vail retain $1,000 of the $25,.000 bond and that the Mountain Haus be given a period of 60 days to complete the items listed, with the exception of items #5 and #8 which will be excluded. When the 60 day period has expired, an inspection will be made and any remaining items must then be completed within 10 days or Mountain Haus will forefeit the $1,000 and the Town of Vail will complete the items. In addition, under item #5, they have agreed to furnish some type of circulating fan for ventilation. A check for $1,000 was presented to the Town-and the $25,000 band was returned. U • B, Case B-9-72 - Apollo Park - Request to allow basement to 'be used as habitable space (recreation and la~ridry room) without considering it another story to determine the required type of construction. The Board first pointed out that there is plumbing already installed for two units in the basement. The conception of the Rpollo recreation room is much different than the idea the Board has of what a recreation room is. Mr: Ogilby then presented sketches of what they would like to do in the basement area (sketches attached). Mr. Ogilby insisted that Mr. Struble insisted that there be three recreation rooms ins~head of one and therefore, they have spent a lot o~E extra money on that basis,. Mr. Struble denied that he had ever suggested such an arrangement. Mr. Struble then elaborated that thea~e appears to be p I umb i ng prov i deci for two or four units in the basement of each building, Mr. Viele stated that there is so much doubt about what will be done with the area that we cannot grant the variance as presented. Mr. Struble then suggested that we discuss the variance in private and give Mr, Ogilby a decision shortly. After much discussion, it was decided that there is no hardship and Viele suggested that we disapprove the variance as proposed. Mr. 5tru61e then suggested that they be limited to one water closet, one lava- tory and one kitchenette in each building. A motion was then made by Mr. Knox that we disapprove the variance as presented by Mr. Ogilby. The motion was seconded by Mr. Viele and ap- proved unanimously by the Board. The Board then stated that they would recommend that a variance might be approved allowing one recreation room in the basement of each building with na more than two bathrooms (consisting of one water closet and one lavatory) and one kitchenette. Mr. Ogilby was told that he must come -back to the Board with drawings so that we may grant a variance on these recommendations and for specific plans. C. Case 8-8-72 - Kiand.ra:. _. - Request for building variance in nonconformance with Section 3:305 (i), 3303 (b) and 1344 of the Uniform Building Code. (I) Variance request to allow employees lounge to be used for sleeping purposes and provide a 1 adder to w i ndow for second ex i t w i th s i l l Y[ea.~ht of 72'f , A motion was made by Mr, Knox that the variance be approved. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hoyt and approved unanimously by the Board. (2) Request to allow door that is not a required exit swing in wrong direction. Mr. .Struble pointed _ _. ~ ~, Board of Zoning, Appeals and Examiners Minutes afi Meeting July i3, 1972 Page 3 out that this is an unsafe condition as it would be con- fusing in the event of fire, A motion was made by Mr. Knox that the Kiandra be required to change the direction of swing or lock the door anal remove the hardware: The motion was seconded by Mr. Viele. The Board voted unanimously to deny the variance. (3) Request not to install exterior handrails at steps on-west side at south end of buiJiding. The discussion disclosed that 'h~his is a required exit from the lodge portion of the building. A motion was made by Mr. Knox that they be required to install a handrail on at least one side of the stair. The motion was seconded by Mr. Viele and approved unanimously by the Board. D, Case B-7.72 - Lift House - Request for building variance in nonconformance with Table 17-A to allow wood roof over b« ooncrete slab, Mr. Lazier presented drawings and pointed out that the area in question (fourth floor condominiums) • have 8" precast ceilings, and the area would be treated so that it would be two hour construction. Mr. Struble stated that he agrees with Mr, Lazier and because of 2,000 square feet the building is a Type Il instead of a: Type Iil as the building was designed. No wood is al.law~ed in a Type II building. The Board discussed the ma~tt`er and determined that the corridor area must be protected .so that any fire could not get out into the corridor. The 2 x IO1s over the corridor area must be fire rated and an 8" block separation must be provided between roof and corri-dor areas. A motion was made that the variance be granted by Mr. Knox provided that the materials as discussed are used over corridor T-10. The mo- tion was Seconded by Mr, Hoyt and approved unanimously by ' the Board, E. Case Z-6-72 ~- Bank of Vail- - Request for 7 I/2' setback in lieu of 15' on west side of building. The variance had been ,granted on a preliminary basis at the last meeting and had • been discussed at that time. R motion was made by Mr. Knox that the variance be granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Viele and approved unanimously by the Board. F. Case Z-II-72 - Hilton (Bush Construction) - Preliminary variance request for zero setback in lieu ofi i0' on west side of pro- - posed building. Rfter Mr. Catcher had presented the plans for the building and some discussion from the Board, it was decided that the Board would recommend passage of the variance after itfs properly posted for the required period of time provided there are no objections from adjoining property owners. G. Case Z-IZ-72 - David Hoffman (Site 1.0) - Request fior 0' setback on east and west sides of site 10, This is a .pre- liminary hearing as the variance was not submitted within the proper posting time. After Mr. Wright and Mr. Sage had presented the drawings for the proposed building and some discussion from the Board, the Board requested a copy of the • LionsHead master plan. in order to. further determine the access for fire equipment to the area if the variance were to be granted. if there is proper access, the Board might consider ,granting the variance,.but.should have further study before they make a committment. ,. :. ~ ,~ r<..:. .., ,. .. Board of Zoning, Repeals and Examiners Minutes of Meeting July 13, 1972 Page 4 t~J • • • H. Case Z-IO-72 - Three Willow Place -- Request far O' setback in lieu of 10} at tract land. The Board had previously discussed this matter at the last meeting and had given Three Willow Place a preliminary o.k. A motion was made by Mr. Knox that the variance be granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hoyt and app raved unanimously by the Board. I. Case Z-8-72 - Gordon Pierce- Residence - Request for setback variance on north and east sides to allow building to con- form to natural contours of lot and to save large trees. Mr. Pierce presented drawings showing grades and trees on his property and stated that he doesn't want to cut large trees on the site to maintain the required setback. A motion was made by Mr. Knox and seconded by Mr. Hoyt that the variance be ap~sroved. The motion was unanimously approved by the Board. J. Case Z-9-72 - Fitzhugh Scott - Request for setback variance on east and sou~-h1h property lines to allow addition to be built in triangular configuration. This variance had been discussed at the last meeting in a preliminary manner, The Board had agreed to grant the variance. A motion was made by Mr. Viele that the +ya~i'iance be granted. The .motion was seconded by Mr. Knox and approved unanimously by the Board. IV. Other Business -- Contractors Licenses were appraved and signed by the Board. Respectfully submitted, TOWN OF VAIL E=d Strub l e (Ex-Officio? dw .: .. :.: LY9(Ed[i~RA~nWV'~"i~.YU~r.w+r.JYJ...w..~.~......w..wiMYMAM ~~. .~~n~~.~~~~ ~~.~. .. ~~~ .. ~ ~~ iii. .~.~. 1 `w. ~u~aJNW%$1.~~.,,,i '4 ~. ii ~..~~,ii~.~ .__4..._..., .ww_u•~~ '~[~yK~p IYYIYHVi1 ~. ~ '"~~ 1 ~ ~I' ', t ~ ~i ~ F ... ~~..,,.,,... v ~G, jugJ9 1p1 ~yiA~ 45:Y~. • .~ ll,~ ~ [g~wc~o .,.~~.,_.....,..~. ... ~. ~,.. RtMn~ ~'~~`~~ V ~ 11 6 ~' p ~ .~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~;~ ~. ,. ~~~ ~ 71 5' i ~~ ~ m~ ~~ ~. . ~ F ~ ~ I ~ ~ „~a b ~~~. s:,.. ~'~ ~~ nTM ~y' L ~. w .. '~`w~r~!:~~~ ~Ya J ~A ~ ~ ~~ 5 °A~ ~ ' n, ~ ~ • ~ '"wa~'r ~ R `1W t' ~3 j ~ i 4 ~ ~` ..,a~ '+~ ev=~M' `gyp ~~ ~~ a=.~ ~,,~ s ~; ;• Y ~~N ~~ ; ~ ~ ~~} ~^ ~ ~ ~~ C ~ '~ ~~ : + ~ ~'~ ~.~ r ~ ~s Cj ~'.; ~i S ...,a~, 'w"1 .. ,~,..., wa~ ~ ~:~ 1 ~ s`;'a Y a ] d M7 N"'~i'M ~, r• ~a~ ~„v ro:", ~h:~i xr~~ ~1 ~_:,%' q;,yRjy~ #",~ Y '~~g rya ~~,~ i"»=, ~.;; z~ ~~~ <„~ ~,~ ~~ .~~~, ~y=~ E~ F -,, t^' ",~ is A`~' ~4 ~~~ C'.,:.. ~~ ~~ ~ pq ~~ aw ~y ~:aG ~`+~~~~ i• • «.,1., `r'~ ~~ ~di + ~ ~w ~~ {{11~~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~~'; , r I ~? ..... ~:~~ ~~; 3 ~~ it ~.. ~•rn~ g ~. ~~~'d irI y,,~a i t E • ~ ~~ d .: ~ €~ ~7 4 €,i~~ ~~'ua i r :,rys_fpj ~, ?Rrr ~ - ~ ' °"' ~ ~w,~.t.,, s r.,. ~~.~;,;:u~ ~ty ii~`,~_~'~ ~'''~u a ~ ~ j .~,._ BOARD 01= ZONING, APPEALS RN.D EXAMINERS MINUTES 01= i+~EETING OCTOBER 12, 1972 I. Meeting called to order: A. The meeting was cal{ed to order at 9:45 a.m. in the Town of Vai! Municipal Building. B. The following members were present: Messrs. Knox, Young, Hoyt and new member Mauri Nottingham. Mr. Viele was absent. C. The fiollowing guests were present: Mr. Dana Ricky, Archi- tect for Vantage Point, 11. Old Business - None II F. New Business A. Case Z-13-72 - W. Grant Williams request for floor arEa ratio varianc e to permit garage to be converted to a bedroom and bath. Af ter the Board reviewed-the facts in the case, and a lengthy discussion, a motion was made by Mr. Young • that the vari ance be denied. The motion was. seconded by Mr. Hoyt and the vote for denial was unanimous by the Board. The variance was denied on the basis that- there is no hard- ship involved other than financial which cannot be considered. The fact that off-street parking is being removed was also. an important consideration. The Board felt that since the house already far exceeds the aliowable floor area d.ue to an error made in 1970, we cannot allow this error to be compounded by allowing further variance firo.m the Zoning • Ordinance. l r~ this case, ignorance. of the Ordinance is not a conside ration in granting the variance. B. Case B-12-72 - Vantage Point requESt for alternate met-hod of providing emergency exit from loft area 210. Mr. Rickli Proposed that he be allowed to furnish an openable window over the 48r' allowable sill height. Mr. Rickli stated he would furnish a window of the free-latch push out type with . a sit! height Mr. Knox that afi approximately 8~.. A motion was made by the variance be granted. The motion was seconded by M r. Young and approved unanimously 1V. Other Business A. All applications for contractors licenses were approved as submitted. V. As there was no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:34 a.m. Respectfully submitted, :TOWN O1= VR I L Jer y L. A! dri cl, (Ex-officio Member) dt 3 ~ i _ _._~ _~' - - ' ' ~ ~? y: 7~- Lf i.v3 ..~~t.t..c•~. ;~ i ._ ~ ' '_s~E fba.~k <? ,sr~.a!~.r~de._.~ ~..~ . ~ %-.#-n.. __ ! j ~ . ~ _ +y i ' a f ~ e ~ a `Q /•3~fa- 1 ./ ~~ '~ Q~iw ~r't~rt~/7"`~~ / ~' /~~r~~r~~' ~7i~+iQ* 7~iw~~~v' I^orll~ ~~~ ~~e,~ T ~ ~ _ ~ ` €. -~7+~ ~ 1A/ i~ Yi~~~ _! ~ I 7t - 1' -I--- ~~l~s~+~_,F~a~a~e~`+we~l~7~0 ~~~erl~a.v{ Ss~~~L!k 7_ r -' r ~ .t•~•.~- _ .~. _.._ ~----~--- . . ~i~o ;i~~ fX r ,~ 3 ~ % P .S ~ha.u '' aacl h~Jq w~ F _e '~ 7 v jry --- ~'t vvtr ~ ~""f ~~--- f ~~•~' - - ~ - - - ~ ._..---r r ~ T - °--r - --t~ ~ ~ Ili ~ NIIR.r',~' -- -- _.._ _ W ~ - _ ~ - - - - - ~ ~~-~.~ i - -- ~ ~ ~~~1 ~~' ~ - ~ : I ~o ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~,~ ~_,,~_l;~ rte; _~ ~ _•s°i __ -~- - - ~~ - _ . l - ---- _ ~ ----y- ----j- -Y7~ - 4 3 r / '" ~' E ' -_ _ / - - - _~_ ., _ ~ d ~ ~. _ -,~' 7 ~~-c~ ' - --- -- - -- -- ~ r~~- ------ -' --- -- - - _ __ - / I _~~r ~t,'~L~,1 ~o ~~e + n' ~[ji : /~ ~ ~ ~ f -7~J-- /wJ ~i~ ~ ' ' t . ~. tlsr'-~yY I E i ~ -- Q l E ._~~ ~~-7^' L-' _~€ (~c1 ~~'~Y""~ _ ~l ~ ~ /4 - .. ~- ~ - ~~// _ / I _~T~_ .-. --_ - -_-_ t ~ ~ ~yl i ---~ - i n - d;~~ ~A~° a jj~I I ~w~<!~~y ~ 1 + ~i ~} '~S ~SJ~.r+, c1. ~ j ~ ~ ~ ; d ~7~ ~if`~_^'~eil"."~, _i•It.~S~ L'ci .'F~t"~1d l~i:~i Ct ~ ~C(~r r ~ ' I ~ ! J i2~ //'~_ t ~~.. ~.~...._ . ~~W ~ ~ F" ~,Z I~ t f 1 _ 1 l:'. +Y I _ E ~~I f! f ! !( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~e.+V ~~ ~¢ / I -{-- I i 3p 1 ~ / i /47j ~I ~ . ~~ ~. { M ~i..~_~ ~ ~i6 _~ I.-_ _~ ~/, f ~~ ~~ ~Q i ~ ~ ~ ~~ si~~P_l~~~Y~.~ mar. 1 . ~.Q V ~/ ~~ sl.. ' i ~ -. ~~ _ _ - .....~ 1 _ _ _ } /- 7J 1 vl!!%~G4. ~ar~I aC~. ~ W . ~ S E,'7`+fJCiC ki r/ ~~nl ! ~r a c~ ot- /:,n ~ ~"' G~7. Q o ~Vt°r' !°%/c ""~ ~ j r_ {E ~~ -_- n ! ~~ ' i ~ f _ /f ~ Y'~Cf IE~3~_~~LG~i~.~! !t t /R~i~A,1_ ~EQ M 9/' L'.t17' r' al i ~ ~ I s -//-7k ' -_ _ _ - -_- `~ _~.?1 _._. ~- i i '' e I /o d, ~'-- - ~ "' ' ~ ~ `/91 ~o ifd7sz,o c~ o rfl ' '~ ~ ,r - -~ _ _ i ~ ~ ,~ ~ /~.~ / t ~F7Gt r ~ ~,r~+''~r~ Rr r ~ i_ E _ L ~ -' ~d '°' s~' ~ r Br'v o '~ ~ - ~~! ~-~~ • ~ ~X ~_ -'' L ~d ~ ~ -- ~- - - i S s de ~f ~'•o ! d % ~ '3~~ -9 7 _ `? ~-~ --- ~ ._+F. L ' ~ .. c~i t _~ ;-__ . i % a~,+~ ~ ~ ~ .: .~<~ }-. _ . _ __ -~- ~ ~~ /I~i y - ~ ~B Gt ~ d w~' { / _ .~". 5~~ ~f.l~.Cp ~ ~/~_'.t~_ I-- o/~' l -. -._ ~ z-._ - - - ~k ~~ I - , I SS .i /~ // rs`c~ra~s!_ ~..G,~• 15 ~ ~.~ ~ ~ E 1 i ~ i i i /F « - { ,1 / a _IP. -. _QN, , ~ ~ _Q1_~ r _~~~ ~ ~~ .~a_~,~ L.~~oszfi ~o I i. 3 e ~ rr - ~ - - - - i _~ - ~, } r I I ~~ - ~'-~ E 1 1 ~ . i ! i + 1 ' ` i a f{ i ~ : ~ r I ~ ----~__ ~' ~ 1 ~ . 1 .. - -~ r - a _;_ ~ __ E ~ ~ r._ ~ -1 ~ ._. _ ... - _ - - .... - 3 I ~ _, - - ' ~ __- _- I-i A z. i .1S- I I v _ - -. ___ - - -_..