Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-0926 PEC1 M U1 4 2. RI Planning and Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes September 26, 1994 1 request w.,.: o for r the Glen o o for a revision to the master pls allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road West/Area D, Glen Lyon SIDID. 0 t. Mike Mollica pointed out that the ratio of compact car spaces to full-size car spaces should be kept in mind. Ken O'Brien responded that the proposed parking would be adequate for Phase L Bob Armour felt the project had a long way to go. He was concerned about the proposed mass of the structure. He felt that the loading berth should be 12 feet in width and located outside the structure to lower the building. Dalton Williams agreed with Kathy's comments. He said that should the applicant proceed with the current proposal, that the two phases be reversed so that the parking structure was built first. Bill Anderson stated that it appeared that the current proposal was designed around the current building and that possibly a demolition of the existing building should be considered. 0 1 ti Allow2 per F/S zoning Existing Building Height: 33 ft. 26 ft. FA: 4,969 sq. ft. 3,710 s. ft. Site Coverage: 3,778 sq. ft. 2,645 sq. ft. Setbacks: Front: 20 ft. Front: 20 ft. West Side: 15 ft. West Side: 15 ft. East Side: 15 ft. East Side: 22 ft. Rear: 15 ft. ear: 62 ft. Staff believes that approval of the requested wall height variance will have no effect on the above- referenced criteria. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: c9peo�munosbonneTS.92ti C E- [7 m NATURAL M� :,�F SUBJECT: A request for a wor on for a major amendment to the Glen Lyon SDID to allow for a revision to the master plan to allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road West/Area D, Glen Lyon SDD. 0 The Glen Lyon Office Building owners would like to expand the existing building and construAn a second building on the eastern portion of the site. Phase I involves adding another floor t the existing building. As the existing building currently has three floors, the proposed additio would result in a total of four floors, Other changes include relocating the bike path, relocati the entrance to the surface parking lot, and expanding the parking lot. I Phase 11 involves a separate building on the eastern portion of the site. There will be two levels of office !c'..` above two levels of structured parking. Phase 11 also includes two employee housing units that will be built on the eastern portion of the parking structure. The employee housing units are a requirement from the original SIDID for Cascade Village. When the applicant first submitted this proposal, a third office building had been proposed at the western end of the site. Staff was very concerned about the site disturbance and the additional curb cut accessing this portion of the site. As a result, the applicant has deleted that portion of the proposal and has concentrated the development in the central portion of t site. I • 2 Ill. DESCRIPTION OF PREVIOUS APPROVAL Staff has summarized the information for the Cascade Village SDD that pertains to Area D below. Site: Area D of the Cascade Village SDD Zoning: SDD Area: 1.300 acres 1. Permitted Uses: Business and professional offices (see Section 13.46.050(D)(3)). Please note that other uses are also listed as allowed in the SDD. 2. Density - Dwelling Units: Three dwelling units are allowed, two of which shall be employee dwelling units. (See Section 13.46.090(D)). 3. Density - GRFA: The GRFA for the EHU's are to be a minimum of 795 square feet and 900 square feet. These dwelling units shall be restricted as Type Ill EHU's. The free market unit shall not exceed 1,630 square feet. Please note that the applicant is not proposing a free market dwelling unit with this proposal. 4. Commercial Square Footage: Total office area for Area D shall not exceed 32,314 square feet. 5. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as indicated on the approved development plans, which are as follows: N: 2 feet S: 3 feet E: 30 feet : 15 feet Core Creek: 50 feet's ( *Please note that the parking structure in the 193E proposal encroached 10 feet into the Gore Creek setback.) 6. Height: A maximum of 51% of the roof can have a height between 32 and 40 feet. A minimum of 49% of the roof area shall have a height under 32 feet. 7. Site Coverage: No more than 37% of the total site area shall be covered by buildings and parking structure. 3. Landscaping: 60% of the area shall be landscaped. 9. Parking: A minimum of one hundred spaces shall be located in the parking structure. Parking shall conform to Town of Vail parking requirements. Please note that there are other standards regarding parking tied specifically to the operation of the micro- brewery. 3 The SDD has several significant development standards that apply to future development. Below are salient points from the previous SDD- 1 The developer's drainage plan shall include a provision for prevention of pollution from surface runoff. 2. The developer shall include in the building construction, energy and water conservation controls as general technology exists at the time of construction. 3. All parking structures shall have pollution control devices to prevent oil and dirt from draining into Gore Creek. 4. Protective measures shall be used during construction to prevent soil erosion into Gore Creek, particularly when construction occurs in Areas A and D. IV. ZONING STATISTICS The development statistics for the proposed buildings in Area D (Phase I and 11) are shown below: L!2Md by SDD EMU2LZ!2asL Proposed Phase II Total {Phases 9 & II) Height: 51 % max. 40 feet 44 feet 44 feet N/A 49% max. 32 feet Setbacks: Per development plan: N: 2 feel N: 23 feet N: 6 feel N/A S: 8 feel S: 36 feet S: 9 feel E: 30 feel E: 414 feel E: 175 feet W: 15 feet W: 99 feel W: 275 feel Stream Setback: 50 feet from centerline 61 feel building 50 feel building N/A 44 feel on-grade parking 44 feel on-grade parking Site Coverage: 37% or 29,010.9 sq. ft. 7,6% or 6,002 sq. ft. 16.1 % or 12,600 sq. ft 23.7% or 18,602 sq. ft. Landscaping: 60% or 47,044.8 sq. ft. 59.6% or 46,761.5 sq. ft. 60.5% or 47,465 sq. ft. see Phase 11 Parking: Per Town of Vail regulations 75.1 spaces required 109 + 4 spaces required 109 + 4 spaces required 76 spaces proposed 107 spaces proposed 107 spaces proposed Commercial Floor Area: 32,314 sq. ft. 18,765 sq. ft. 8,381 sq. ft. 27,146 sq. ft. Density: 1 free market DU allowed -0- 2 EHU's 2 EHU's 2 EHU's required GRFA: minimum size for the two -0- 573 sq. ft. 1,473 sq. ft. employee units shall be -222-SR—ft 579 square feel and 1,473 sq. ft. 900 square feet. Common Area: 35% of 32,314 square feel 3,990.9 sq. ft. 3,962.5 sq. ft. 7,953.4 sq. ft. or 11,309.9 square feet Loading and Delivery: 1 berth required 1 berth 1 berth I berth 4 V. ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION 1. Use - Is the exclusive use of office space on this site (with the addition of two employee housing units) appropriate? Staff believes that removing the micro-brewery from the SIDID and replacing with a large office building reflects the needs of the community at this time. 2. Setbacks - Is the proposed setback from the South Frontage Road appropriate? 0 5 Additionally, the sections should verify that all structures are located outsi e t e 50-foot stream setback. At this time, the 1 "=30' site plan shows an area where it appears that the buildings are in conformance with the setback, but it is not at a large enough scale for staff to verify this. M A. Number of spaces; B. Use of tandem spaces; C. Percentage of compact spaces: D. Number of spaces included in the garage. E. Loading berth location and size; Staff has analyzed the plans and has determined that th . e proposed office space requires 108.6 (or 109) parking spaces. In addition to these, there would be four required spaces for the employee housing units. As a result, there is a total parking requirement of 113 spaces, The applicant has proposed 107 spaces. Staff recommends that the applicant increase the number • spaces, or reduce the amount of floor area generating the parking requirement to insure that the proposal meets the Town's parking standards. Two of the parking spaces shown on the site plan are tandem spaces located on the eastern portion • the lot. Staff believes tandem spaces can work well for full service hotels, but that they would not work well for an office building. We believe the applicant should remove the tandem spaces. Stf� I- d-- H �. & SITE SECTION Parking Requirements Existing & Phase I EabdaO oifla —.: Man a.l. (N.s Pro d Addk—f off w 7,869.L {Mat) T---) A.. M., P . ) !8,698 ..t. (?4.,) C.,­.d.1 1.­ pax 250..t RM d T.., Numbs. 07 s'.— R.—d: 75 25% of R-11.d s— Can 8 C- S.—': 38 ----------- 7 3 M..d..—d Loading 8ar¢h ®c— WASEI PlIA511 I ------ ------ PHASE I PROPOSED SITE PLAN Stf� I- d-- H �. & SITE SECTION Parking Requirements Existing & Phase I EabdaO oifla —.: Man a.l. (N.s Pro d Addk—f off w 7,869.L {Mat) T---) A.. M., P . ) !8,698 ..t. (?4.,) C.,­.d.1 1.­ pax 250..t RM d T.., Numbs. 07 s'.— R.—d: 75 25% of R-11.d s— Can 8 C- S.—': 38 54 S..d.d 3 M..d..—d Loading 8ar¢h ®c— Pierce, S' ' s,_,. A. Architects P.C. •A.LA. Project :— .� —A.; Drawn 0 0 9 0 - --------- 11MAKI ---------- PHASE If F:RO SED SITE PLAN Parking Requirements Existing, Phase I & Phase 11 PHASE Ex. lag Wk. Asa ®. .— ... I 011- A 7."9. 9, Iti.0 ceflm Phasa 11 —1-1 Olfl a A- T.W A— OV- P— I & Ph— It D—opm­: 27."9 .1 los 'k SITE SECTION A 251 2s C­ 1 3 3 Em➢­ N..-e 73 s..- §,ITE SECTION B Amhitscts U) CD z z z 25 0.4 z ua ua U W. U. 0 Q • • A 0 9 0 nl- i ■ Isom m ' ArWfws .78 0 0 PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND Existing Tress CD Sod Lavin Colorado Blue Spruce CD Native Grasses Aspen �ZU� Boulders in planting beds Flowering Crabapple Shrubs Sz, ;learn - -y: M- , CMCHM 11 KAO 110 0 0 6 a a f a s • 4% U3 Li rll� RM #ATE: September 26, 1994 SU Ej U '*OMMERCIAL CORE 11 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS L- Zoning: Commercial Core 11 Area: 1.645 acres or 71,656.2 sq. ft. Allowed P2p2sed Height: 45 feet 18 feet Setbacks: 10' on all sides N: 22' S: 105' E: 80, W: 140' Site Coverage: 70% or 50,159 sq. ft. 1.4% or 1,000 sq. ft. Landscaping: 20% or 14,331 sq. ft. 94.9% or 67,986 sq. ft. Parking: Parking is not required for temporary structures. III® CRITERIA AND FINDINGS 2® The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, Staff believes that there will be little impact on traffic or related issues as the proposed structure may actually increase pedestrian traffic in the area, but is not likely to generate additional vehicular trips in Lionshead. The Fire Department has stipulated that the tent may only be used for one hundred and eighty days, that ^ ®©» «2«mus be fire retardant, and that the maximum occupant load be sixty-seven persons. Vail Associates has agreed to comply with these standards. A �gg i m i � a ti i t- ---------- t / F / \_-_ ------------------- V_� 0 �a s m 2 Of �, ,f'Y .� `_r • •