The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994-1010 PECSite Visits 1:00 P.M. Frederick 44 Willow Place Drivers: Andy and Jim Public earin 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a conditional use to allow for three employee housing units to be located at 44 Willow Place/Lot , dock ,flail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Jay Peterson Planner: Andy Knudtsen 2. A request for a setback variance to allow for CRFA to be located in the front setback for a proposed structure at 2340 asin dale Boulevard/Lot 4, dock 9, Vail Intermountain, Applicant: Daniel Frederick Planner: Andy Knudtsen . A request for an update o the conditional use permit approval for the tent to be used for the Vail Associates ski school to be located south of the Lionshead Center Building/Tract A, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing. Applicant: Tim Kehoe, representing Vail Associates Planner: Andy Knutsen 5® request for front and side setback variances to allow for a new residence to be located at 1733 Alpine Drive/Lot 11, Vail Village West 1 st Filing. Applicant: Thomas Theys Planner: Jim Curnutte TABLED INDEFINITELY . A request for a setback variance to allow for are expansion to the residence that would extend to within 4.7 feet of the property line at 4295 Nugget Lane/Lot 7, Bighorn Estates. Applicants Margaret Cross Planner: Randy Stouder WITHDRAWN 7. A request for a worksess€ n for a Special Development District and a major CCII exterior alteration to alloy for the redevelopment and expansion of the L'®stello Lodge located at 765 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, dock 2, Vail/Lionshead 3rd Filing. Applicant: Alien, Inc./John Dunn Planners Randy Stouer TABLED INDEFINITELY 6. Approve minutes from September 2, 1994 PC meeting. Council Update: -Open Space text amendments. 10. Vail Commons Update. MEMORANDUM Applicant: Jay Peterson Planner: Andy Knudtsen 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST 1 II® ZONING CONSIDERATIONS Lot Size: 0.29 acres or 12,632.4 square feet Zoning: High Density Multi-Family Allowed/Re uire Proposed Site Coverage: 6,947 sq. ft. or 55% 4,673 sq. ft. or 37% Density: 2 5.3 affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with appropriate restrictions. 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. . The effect of the use on light o air, distribution population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. Staff believes that there will be no negative impact from the use of the floor area as employee housing on the issues referenced above. 3. Effect traffic it particular reference t congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal n from the street and parking re sa The original project was designed to accommodate all parking requirements for the three townhouses as well as the three employee housing units. Staff believes that there will not be a negative impact from the proposal on the criteria listed above. Effect upon the character of t r in is the proposer' • e - t located, including the scale a bulk of the r se u- Jn relation t surrounding uses. Findings The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before orantina a conditional use permit: That the proposed location of the use in accord with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. I That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. 3 IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION c\pec\memos\jay 10.10 c...- •,° J 0 ?Lga'?'?°,b i ,4?`rq ? ? 'y_.?.._?---- _ p _? ??^ 0-? a 10 40 as d?^? . t ::.: 1 gf , j t u 9 i{ o 4 rw'a f/<jfj _ 1 gas y} c Ta °dxfcx (4'Sl? 1y?, ti y 4 s r \? 4 °?° .?,v.m ?°v. f ! •'sc s N? :+? ..?? ??'?j. , y t? '?"r $" ag ?f 7 ?.?=s e 4" "' ?9` , 9- _ _ ? . e------°-'---•- .`? ?? ?,/: . +3' ,f'k ..-?.°°". e? .°? as<,as.. se S='- ? ?_?r°-• ?"$?? g a ..- ? ; ;.A * 3 ?'° '? 1 ,? t J ? `;nao' `a"E--a,? '? P ? F',? °? ? -?''?•?r-?"Sr ?.y. t -d" } ?.,, a J' Why, ? '? >i r/'"_ `...C`yam `l, a ?,t--" _a:: ?.t:„- ,,?. ?+°"`?9 /9 / ?•, a t((e-?. J Py; PAM 0- 010 <4 tY°--e Y r °0021- w h / i °' % .' ? n , '`§, io°j ' !? . C 7?--9 P ? F : ? a ti ?. f Y^'" ' tu<o e, 1 / t T.- a a p o- . 1ti J 4 a' { { l } ?/ '?/?/ ?`.1 \l"` '4°i.Z'..? ''c 0g?.? S° ° ae••?-a' i y ,„ d. ?-.< ! g? I 1411. -ZZ `` _ ?` `JY ^ s^ tilt G ?. 0 8 1. 1 ' 1 East McvAdon d a' 3 ? All 1111 IrdlRe,gg i -tee i wr e.l ti ` I. I F S"th Elevation North Elevation 7'++ I i MEMORANDUM Applicant: Holiday House Condominium Association Planner: Andy Knudtsen is DESCRIPTION T VARIANCE REQUESTED This fall, the Holiday House Condominium Association proposed improvements to the entrance of the building which were approved by the Design Review Board ( H ). These improvements included resurfacing the entry courtyard and installing a handicap accessible wheelchair ramp. These improvements are currently under construction. IIw ZONING STATISTICS Zoning: Public Accommodation Setbacks: Landscape Area: 30% of site or 36.8% or 8,504.2 sq. ft. 10,441 sq. ft. Site Coverage: 55% of site or 43.0% or 15,591.0 sq. ft. 12,192.2 sq. ft. Wariance requested. III. CRITERIA FINDINGS Proposed Total 12.5' n/a no change 30,652 sq. ft. 63 sq. ft. 29.6% or 6,576.1 sq. ft. 17' 2' 23716' None required for storage, lobby, or front desk area. no change None, as expansion is located over parking garage n/a n/a n/a n/a 36.8% or 10,441 sq, ft. 43.0% or 12,1922 sq. ft Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62,060 Of the Vail Municipal Cede, the Community Development Department recommends denial Of the requested variance based on the following factors- A. Consideration of Factors: 2 Concerning the 10,5 square feet of building that would be located in the front setback, staff recognizes that this will not have a detrimental impact on the surrounding properties. The magnitude of the encroachment is not extensive and should not have significant negative impacts on the surrounding properties. 2. °t degree t which relief from the strict an literal interpretation n enforcement of specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility uniformity of treatment among sites i the vicinity or attain t objectives of this title without grant special privilege. 3, The effect of the requested variance light ire distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff believes that there will be no negative impacts on any of the criteria, lists above, B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findin before arantino a variance,. 1, That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 3 a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. ba There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that o net apply generally to other properties in the same zone. C. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. STAFF IV. -D I c:\pec\m e mos\h oil d ay. var 4 - \ -- ? ?..? ? asryyatr? ® ct P5 U 1 ? nira :9 ' FOUND s-a" w,w v r P;N . CAY ,, AEG 5 .43l8(Typ) _29.3./. 00 z i C7 o? a. ems"' Ws \ r• , w ^e l rn ..p \ ""V r l9. J9 ... .._ ... .- ._ - . _.. ?,am. «• v a,. .. e'er v \? / / r Sp ??• SIX STORY f 7 ?? a?? E 1 h:'" CONDOMINIUM BUILDING 9' w A8AR 5? / ?3_i zI ?Z. THE HOLDAY HOUSE' \ ?? v\\? .V 13. ' ,VL s n o \\e % V t HOt cbN?RerE ', \? ?a TUR a<x. ° v. ? ,yv W <T 5'ET PIN a CAP L S 2"1, (TVPf S 89°37'00' 98.75 ' WINGS+ 5 74116'12'° £' ALONG THE 'ERLY LOT LINE 8ETWEEN FOUND AS INDICATED, to?Colorado }am° you must commence 44 sed upon any deflect to this survey after you first discover such defect, action based upon such defect to g need more than ten years from the 9 atiou sh_o hereon -- - --- - ------- ft- RIVER ROCK w LS m +if"