The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-0424 PECTHIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY 10 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of th Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on April 24,1995, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of V Municipal Building. In consideration of- I Applicant: Glen Lyon Partners Planner: Randy Stouder 2. A request for a parking variance and a conditional use permit to allow for a temporary building to house a laboratory for the Vail Valley Medical Center, located at 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E & F, Vail Village Second Filing. he Applicant- Michael Lauterbach Planner- Jim Curnutte 4. A request for a minor exterior alteration in the CCII zone district and a landscape variance to allow for the addition of handicap access located at the Lifthouse Lodge/549 at Lionshead Circle/Lot 39 Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing. 6. A request to amend the Vail Land Use Plan for 16 properties throughout the Town of Vail. Fifteen properties are proposed to be changed from their current designation to open space an one property would be changed to the public semi public designation. See the attached Exhibit A for legal descriptions. Applicant: Town of Vail Planners® Jim Curnutte and Russell Forrest APRIL 24,1995 AGENDA Pro.ject Orientation/Lunch 12:00 p.m. Site Visits 1® P.M. rt 0 E3 f:\everyoneNpec\agendas\042495.wpd 10 Bob Armour Henry Pratt Jeff Bowen Greg Moffet 104-1 Jim Curnutte Randy Stouder Russell Forrest Susan Connelly Andy Knudtsen Lori Aker Public Hea"n 2:00 p.m. 1 A request for a minor subdivision to allow for the relocation of a building envelope, located at 1139 Sandstone Drive/Lot 3, Block A, Lionsridge, Filing #1 /Indian Creek Town homes. Applicant.- Michael Lauterbach Planner- Jim Curnutte 7 Jim Curnutte stated the acknowledgment is an affidavit stating that the owner has read the geologic hazard report and understands Jim Curnutte explained if any part of the property (Lots A and A-2) is in the hazard zone, the owner our be required to sign an affidavit, There is no difference between the building envelope and the property. Mike Lauterbach still feels he would be signing a report that would be incorrect, but he would sign it. Planning and Environmental Corarnission Minutes April 24, 1995 Jim Curnutte stated the building site should be referred to as "building envelopes". Jeff Bowen asked what exactly has Mike Lauterbach sold? Mike Lauterbach stated the whole Lot #3. Henry Pratt said it sounds like Mike Lauterbach has sold the land as a separate lot. Mike Lauterbach said the Town ordinance does not allow for this, property to be lots, but he felt they should not be considered building envelopes. Bob Armour questioned the geological report. Jim Curnutte stated again it is just a report for Mike to sign acknowledging that he has read the report, stating the lot is in a geologic hazard zone. Mike Lauterbach indicated he has no problem signing this form, but disagrees with the wording of the affidavit. Andy Knudtsen indicated the affidavit has always been worded this way whenever any portion VI the site is in the hazard zone. The chair asked for public input. There was no public input. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes April 24, 1995 2 Andy Knudtsen presented the project to the PEC. Staff believes that the project's impacts would be fairly minimal and staff recommends approval. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes April 24, 1995 5 Westhaven Drive, with the condition that the sidewalk between the two entries to the parking garage be constructed and that 15.7 parking spaces be required, and that the applicant must come back within 12 months to present a comprehensive solution to the entry and sidewalk issue. Second by Greg Moffet and passed unanimously by a 5-0 vote. Randy Stouder reviewed the request with the Board. The applicant is requesting clear direction from the PEC before proceeding with this project. Randy went through each discussion issue in the staff memo and the Board gave their thoughts as follows: ME Greg Moffet is in favor of the office spaces since there is a great need for good office space within the Town. Kevin Deighan thinks the building should accommodate 1 to 2 person office spaces as opposed to a few large offices, due to a lack of small office space availability. Jeff Bowen and Bob Armour both support the proposed office use. Greg Moffet said a bus shelter is OK with him. Jeff Bowen stated a bus stop is OK, but will 11 ;,eldom used. Bob Armour is not sure of bus usage. A shelter seems appropriate. Randy Stouder stated the TOV Landscape Architect will delineated a buffer zone around the tree bases. SITE PLAN PHASE 1, Minutes April B4, 1995 5 in the parking lot. The applicant's plan showed a 20'width and that is what currently exists onsite. Bob Armour wondered if the Fire Department has any problems. Ken O'Brian stated they have no problems with the site plan as proposed. The PEC felt that due to the extreme narrowness of the site, they could live with the 20'travel aisle. MUMMY— 777q-073-t TV M-1- 'IS( sure that parking layout works onsite. He requested this staking prior to final PEC review of the application. Gordon Pierce, also a project architect, wanted to know if staff and the Board's concerns for impacts on the streambank are aesthetic or functional. Randy Stouder responded that it is an environmental issue. The stream banks are so steep, the applicant needs to be as careful as possible with the south edge of the buildings and the parking lot. Gordon Pierce wanted clarification that if he stays within the setbacks can it be built? Randy Stouder stated the applicant must stay out of the stream setback with all structures and grading. Existing streambank areas should also be preserved, without any disturbance beyond what is necessary to convey storm runoff down to the creek. Greg Moffet wanted to know if the current parking is inadequate. Gordon Pierce says the existing building is over their parking allotment. Ken O'Brian said he needs to get with Randy Stouder to work out the parking numbers and the site plans so that both Phase I and ll meet th parking requirements. Gordon Pierce said they would fully comply with the parking requirement 1 Planning and Environmental Conunission Minutes April 24, 1995 7 units and deed restricting them would not be acceptable. WATER QUALITY Randy Stouder said staff feels the building proposed now is too high. Staff feels a compromi-se to bring down the roof ridge should be looked at. He suggested lowering the ridge and adding dormers to break up the long ridge line. Gordon Pierce disagrees that the height is excessive. The 51/49 percentages expressed in the brewery approval is too restrictive. You need to look at the overall impact. The view from different angles should be considered. The buildings across the street would be higher than what he was proposing. WIN I'll, I lil III iiiiii iiiiiiijil I I alm�MM�� UNDERGROUND UTILITIES: Illir I !Ili 1 1111111 11 1 1. M i � mat I MGM -117 Jelyi-Vullullig Ul tile ellille tiectlull 01 U111111U5 willarl ai- In Lite TuArMys T le -7 r 1' 11" 1 1 players could be brought together at a later date. Bob Armour wants the applicant to put their lines underground now and the TOV to put theirs underground now. Jim Viele, co-applicant, stated they will pay their share to put the lines underground along their frontage. They are anxious for this to happen. Gordon Pierce wants it done now instead of tearing up landscaping later. Minut ®s April 24, 1995 8 Bob Armour asked if the Board has given the applicant enough input? Gordon Pierce said all the comments have been very helpful. Greg Moffet noted that 2 PEC members were absent (Dalton Williams and Greg Amsden) and their input was not reflected today. 6. A request for a worksession for an amendment to the Vail Land Use Plan for 16 properties throughout the Town of Vail. Fifteen properties are proposed to be changed from their current designation to open space and one property would be changed to the public semi public designation. See the Attachment 1 for legal descriptions. Applicant- Town of Vail Planners, Jim Curnutte and Russell Forrest Mill! !1 11011 1 IN IMIN: 111�111 Jill 1 Jim Curnutte told the Board at their next meeting we will discuss how each parcel will meet the 40 criteria for changing the Land Use Plan. Jeff Bowen, OK, but streamline it. The PEC felt they do not need a site visit to these properties at the next meeting. Minutes A pril 24 1995 r. lljllqq�lpl �l��l MEMORANDUM TO- Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: A request for a minor subdivision to modify the boundaries of an existing building envelope and to relocate a twenty foot wide drainage and utility easement at the Indian Creek Townhomes, 1139 Sandstone Drive/Block A, Lionsridge Subdivision, First Filing. The applicant is requesting approval of a minor subdivision in order to modify the boundaries of an existing building envelope, Building Envelope #3, and to relocate a twenty foot wide drainage and utility easement at the Indian Creek Townhomes, located at 1139 Sandstone Drive, Block A, Lionsridge Subdivision, First Filing. In March of 1994, a building permit ,was issued for a second residence in the subdivision. This building was constructed on the eastern half of lot 1 and upon completion, a new plat was submitted which created a separate lot around the residence. 2 • EIRE] M r] Although this request does not affect any of the below listed zoning criteria, staff is providing this zoning analysis in order to give the PEC an idea of the development potential on the entire Indian Creek Townhouse subdivision, when fully built out: Allowed per the Allowed per t Approved Proposed Amended Plat Zoning, Residential Cluster Same Lot Area- 113,428 sq.ft. Same Buildable Lot Area. 69,457 sq.ft. Same GRFA Allowance- 17,363 sq.ft. plus a 225 Same sq.ft. credit per unit Density- 9 Units Same* Site Coverage- 28,356 sq.ft. Same Size Of Building Envelope 3: 3,025 sq.ft. 3,080 sq.ft. • 3 13� ELQnLa-= The Vail Municipal Code requires that lots in the Residential Cluster zone district have a minimum frontage of 30 feet. The site currently has a frontage well in excess of 30 feet, and the proposed minor plat amendments will not affect the frontage of the lot. C. Site Dimenaigna The Vail Municipal Code requires that each site be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, 80 feet on each side, within its boundaries. The site currently exceeds the size and shape requirement for lots in the Residential Cluster zone district, and the proposed minor plat amendments will have no effect on the size and shape of the lot's boundaries. The second set of criteria to be considered with a minor subdivision request are outlined in Section 17.16.110 of the Vail Subdivision Regulations, and are as follows: 4 40 Staff Re To provide for the subdivision of property in the future without conflict wi development on adjacent land. i Sloff -Basgo n s-e. The proposed minor plat amendments being reviewed by the PEC would not appear to create any conflict with development on adjacent land. Notification of this request was provided to all property owners adjacent to the Indian Creek Townhomen property. To date no responses or comments have been received concerning this application. C. To protect and conserve the value of land throughout the municipality and the value of buildings and improvements on the land. Staff Response: Staff believes that this proposal will not be detrimental to the value of land, buildings or other improvements throughout the Town, nor in the immediate area of the Indian Creek Townhomes. is 5 E. To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide adequate and efficient transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreational and other public requirements and facilities and generally to provide that public facilities will have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. staff -ggaamagj This section of the subdivision regulations is intended primarily to address large scale subdivisions, as opposed to the minor plat amendments currently being considered by the PEC. We do not believe that this proposal will impact any of the above facilities. F. To provide for accurate legal descriptions of newly subdivided land and establish reasonable and desirable construction design standards and procedures. Staff -Bgaponse: This is an inherent goal of the subdivision regulations and legal descriptions will be provided on the plat for all of the changes being proposed in conjunction with this minor subdivision application. G. To prevent the pollution of air, streams, and ponds, to assure adequacy of drainage facilities, to safeguard the water table and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the municipality in order to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the community and the value of the land. Staff supports the applicant's proposed minor plat amendments. There are no relocation. Additionally, the proposed shifting of the drainage and utility easement, approximately 10 feet to the east, will not be detrimental to any surrounding natural resources. V. SIMEBECQMMENDAILOIN The staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a minor subdivision to modify the boundries of building envelope #3 and to relocate the adjacent twenty foot wide drainage and utility easement at the Indian Creek Townhomes. We believe the applicant has met the review criteria outlined in Section IV of this memorandum. The staff recommendation for approval carries with it the following conditions: 6 0 ti ti 0 0 F:\eveiyone\pec'Tnemos\ auler.424 ATTACHMENT #1 (Approved Development Plan) j SANDSTONE DRIVE 50) _ g 9 j fouAc 1/2' RaAR W rd WASHER - Ll 1511 14R 9 1 N. 0.245 ACRES :2 jjj.6,�, TRACT A 5 0 ol --k '5 -2 �-54 Pj2 50, FT CcUllo 5; 5 72',' 4 'W IJI.,50' 7- a 228 'A CRES 7- 47 '-r �w 4 A RES C0,0101MV ARSCA 5457254 ro,.,o pw a Pf 204.80' /ygyi ' cVRl`°2 41P6:YJe 448 "Ab uD 7`r 4,'f aU db' . 00 r,VNO 1/7' P£9AR WIWASw£R LS Na ➢5➢➢ CUR lr J Bop � � RNCw ALL a+6N 0010 A9P ro R b�A *� e8 huaP w-6a. Ps I® °° e— a- f^°Ao' 8a LA. owl— m 1� _ S y�. 6&8 N4Ph,-W Ra*A MAO 8/7' A EAR WIWA,$H£R B n®1l ea &onkAI e� 8.S N'Q 751P TOO % arm9repe s'oe.: �t ego -�aa � @ J ^ . ( ~ HICN E WRO.NMEWAL R J MODE•RA PE' rO HICH f/ CPN.STRAfNT,S aox•g aPr LOr 6 ' - 0MRORMEWAL CONSPRA1NIS cfO s 545—,2.54'w 5147' ° S4572547 ,zrOCE rf?4C r 4. F7LflVG tdf? .2 COMMON AR,-A 89,478 souARc rEEr a tor r 2.056 ACtsES �h Zll TR OAS$ZAhg �b sPi "'S4'ta°_ ^a7 GP' 5 Z Lol° ia65a °Nary A— a 15 6 4z° 55. ®0° $ n' °sc3sARe azasA 1Q. v N'a57?m4 e � .� f _ mDs s zA✓AaRL€ BS�a 6na . PrzT .aa R S ^ w !6'4572;54 5� N ! A e o _ \` w � !Or A —.3 NAs7z's4 � � 2c4.8o° $+�"'4d• rRAcr � g .seT S/e• a£sA,m R°,�ASOc v � A ! CAP P•C k ALI Z66a6 k 4`45 72'54'E 406.64° PP � FOUNO P..� P.L 66 b 1 (npj .SANDSTONE taiVE (50 1 J �R� "• P MAD AND ° t.J PT✓'.$ P{AT %S A PART Or TM° Fi9«v++ep/SC AfaARA:,pot Paa fR.ASPC CAP 'PEAK PVC D9JR` - CR£P'K e'ermrES fY'M' OF:AaA nFiv) Rd'C�DCJ • 21 +`TC ° ,- A-CA ° &$ifl MNS R(AT i$ Po, AID "Xcr ➢V PPOe"9&ls N7` d.1CLA -P01.. 1) 1073' 8 mV 4 AAF SZMXCr TO vrmopmrw Rio<,7 AS Dr,4C,TOLD N =WD J10 PC VlfaARA P01, 4% PVLW ARf NV fVVT0A 8S ACRCSS AVI 8'Ml9 %h£ A['Ag PRORCRP COsMV Of FEES nAT, r'XC'EPr AS SIC- PA+ TAS P. r, 1 . S.j - £�Fg P ND Y3 G� fY SC F 9*aS ILAF rO PCOC 7D D XGPAkPlIIC 1%ae.'BafN,°3 .IZZ Rf_'PyN TO DCY9ML'N➢3 RCC ✓ . ZW CAQZ CAm'P, D� ADO Rvt [3 `A,T Rrcms, - 61 RATS a- SCA~S- K 44;37`06' R 67046 ruf SOII ST 101,1FR tor A -,y pvvc A D 319° prso AND PLASnD w N .. SAX ^ 09.99' TO P'f N ,,H -C3T €R PY LOT A -4 RCW C - A FOUW Pfd'RFRAR REAP A MASHER pAMIM L$ PSBP° 7j WS T,.$ AIV 4, ARE nW FVl"f 8 _ a/ TRACT A - GRV7 EASMDVr MR CKANAM UMMM ACT= AND asex �AM 0..) MACr A DPES HDr wThfwAvcAu F° a= RY 446' DATA M Tne f Al a7 4 ( ' P01) CA Tf C, AYRbk r CCMMR Ilj [ 96 T[E'T ) "J LWSR C AxVAN MC?R° M—OO ✓P,'S AR@' 80CA70 N 41D HfPP HAZIns @ 4®e ®099 &VSR,S FIC6S AND &WW AVO HCA HAZARD ROMIAU HAZ4fiV AS P4A 01AAWt TO 6P PtC MW OF Wk 7rt "CZTA1 AORCE Aeemd g Pa 44466® as pav muaP rca C,11 d* 1 a ley pef dasPd 0ekrP 3s 1416#, Mm. pas+a eK� r J"t d➢ owe+^ -TA b°a1 F, . $v Ao 6.®7`7`4 maX m+y .SePlaw basmd apw� 0rvy O ,Wl h cm»meflemq me^a U9R PM gr9.'4 tP oen M, 840 g ®( o, 0 of c ® �aPtRCaelm's � ®ten A�abre, (First amended t) SCALE: I' = 20' w BASIS OF EL EVA 7-10N.- MH A = 128 8.27 RIM ELEV 8248.31 INV OUT = 8244.0' DA IF RSMOM ImpRo vEmEN r LOO 77ON CER 77FICA 7F iWAW fr LOT J, INDIAN CREEK TOMMOMES TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNT)' COLORADO A` TA #4 rip SCALE: I' = 20' w BASIS OF EL EVA 7-10N.- MH A = 128 8.27 RIM ELEV 8248.31 INV OUT = 8244.0' DA IF RSMOM ImpRo vEmEN r LOO 77ON CER 77FICA 7F iWAW fr LOT J, INDIAN CREEK TOMMOMES TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNT)' COLORADO A` TA #4 OU� MEMORANDUM In September and December of 1992, the Town Council passed Ordinances 9 and 27, Series of 1992, to create a new Chapter 18-57 - Employee Housing, to provide for the addition of Employee Housing Units (EHUs) as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts within the Town of Vail. The definition in that ordinance states, Section 18.04.105 In this proposal, the applicant is proposing to construct a Type II employee housing unit on a portion of the second level of a new prim ary/seco ndary residence. The employee housing unit will be approximately 450 square feet in size and will include one bedroom, one bathroom and a kitchen/living area, One enclosed parking space will also be provided for the EHU. 5111 1 P.,mumvi I aggy, I tV MUIC; MUt I IV 10 U1 LI IV LULCU site area (1,573 square feet) may be covered by driveways and surface parking. Ill. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Section 18.60 - Conditional Use Permits, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the conditional use permit based upon the following factors.- 2 Staff believes that there will be little impact from the proposed Type 11 EHU on light, air, population, transportation, utilities, schools or parks. 3. jEHpct upon traffic with particular reference to congestion automotive and ety and convenience traffic flow and control, access maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parkaroes- It is likely that there would be one additional vehicle associated with this residence. Staff feels that this would be an insignificant impact on the above-referenced criteria. 4. EE!ff[ge�on �the c�harac�ferof t�hearea �ln w�hic __the proposed use is to be ed use in relation to surro jn4!ng-gaps- The scale and bulk of the existing structure is very similar to those in existence in the surrounding neighborhood. Since the proposed employee housing unit will be located within the building, it would not appear to have a negative effect on the scale and bulk of the residence in relation to surrounding uses. a. It shall be a conditional use in the Sincjle--Eam� R�eside�htial jA2:fFgapm2!y d Prim /Secoh�d Residential zone districts. b. It shall be Dermitted only on lots which comDlv with minimum lot size located. At 15,730 square feet in size, the lot meets the minimum lot size requirements in the Primary/Secondary zone district. 3 The proposed EHU will be a third dwelling unit on the site. It contains a full kitchen and full bathroom facilities. The EHU is 450 square feet in size. The applicant has submitted an application for 500 square feet of additional GRFA utilizing the provision which allows for the use of 250's "up front" when creating a new Type 11 EHU. No additional 250's will be allowed on this property in the future. It shall have no more than two bedrooms. complies with this criteria. 9. No more sixtee ;1 11 ii litears of le shall reside in a one ii: 1 bedroom Type 11 EHU. No older than bedroom Tvr)e 11 EHU. Since this unit is a one (1) bedroom Type 11 EHU, the first part of the above listed regulation will be complied with. Since no dwelling units currently exist on the property, the applicant must provide one enclosed parking space for the proposed EHU. ftdings: 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of Title 18 of the Vail Municipal Code. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1111 OF 111 111 11IR 1 0,11 • 5 Type 11 Employee Housing Unit. Staff believes that the review criteria have been met as discussed in the memo. Regarding the findings, staff believes that finding B1 is met as the proposed use is in accordance with the purposes of the zoning ordinance as well as the zone district. Finding B2 is met, in staff's opinion, as the proposed use is not detrimental to public health, safety or welfare. Finding B3 is met, in staff's opinion, as the proposal complies with all of the standards of the zoning code. Staff recommends approval of the request with the following condition: 1) Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed structure, the applicant shall sign a deed restriction using the form provided by the Town of Vail. This document will be recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office and will require that the employee housing unit be permanently restricted for employee housing. I Please note that under Section 18.60.080 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the approval of a conditional use permit shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion, or the use for which the approval has been granted has not commenced within two years from when the approval becomes final. o 0 1. 0 '144 FORESI, R TD ------ OAD NOKM SITE PLAN SCALE: I'- W VLAGE FIRST FILING mwm sums 1 AIL VILLOT S. BLOCK 7 TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO LOT 6 LOT I LOY 4 r1l"ll A -F. .'.. SCALE: P - IV Plem, seprberg & ARsoclates, 0 Archh"to TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO KN2 -Tort NORTH SCALE: P - IV _.AAW-VtAft ePE 9 0 LOT 5, BLOCK 7 VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO -Tort _.AAW-VtAft —j Of 11 0 0 Pierce, Segerberg & Associates, Architects I I . . . . . . . . . . ..................... Plem, m 0 - 0 NI a� /�< ` 9 _ EAST ELEVATION 0 0 0 li lm� 0 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION \� �� R'll The Planning and Environmental Commission Cif the Town of Vail Vail CO HAND DELIVERED Re: Application of Byrne, et al. Lot 5, Block 7, 'Vail Village First Filing TELEPHONE: (970) 476-0300 TELECOPIER: (970) 476-4765 KAREN M. DUNN CERTIFIED LEGAL ASSISTANT The consideration by the Planning and Environmental Commission of the foregoing concern is appT / Very try W YO)trs, 11 M-09TAW OW-1 N El Ff, N rN/ is LAW OFFICES DUNN, ABPLANALP & CHRISTENSEN, P. C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION JOHN W. DUNN VAIL BANK BUILDING ARTHUR A. ABIPLANALP, JR. SUITE 300 ALLEN C. CHRISTENSEN DIANE L. HERMAN 108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST CAROL E. DAVIS VAIL, COLORADO 81657 SPECIAL COUNSEL: 10 April 1995 JERRY W. HANNAH The Planning and Environmental Commission Cif the Town of Vail Vail CO HAND DELIVERED Re: Application of Byrne, et al. Lot 5, Block 7, 'Vail Village First Filing TELEPHONE: (970) 476-0300 TELECOPIER: (970) 476-4765 KAREN M. DUNN CERTIFIED LEGAL ASSISTANT The consideration by the Planning and Environmental Commission of the foregoing concern is appT / Very try W YO)trs, 11 M-09TAW OW-1 N El Ff, N rN/ is MEMORANDUM TO.- Planning and Environmental Commission DATE: April 24, 1995 SUBJECT: A request for a minor exterior alteration in the Commercial Core 11 (CCII) Zone District to allow for the modification of an existing outdoor dining deck at the Lifthouse Lodge, 555 East Lionshead Circle, legally described as a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing, Applicants: Robert T. and Diane J. Lazier Planner: Jim Curnutte ZONING L 1 Allowed per Per the recently C 11 Zonin Appmygd Plans Site Area: 0.467 acre same or 20,334 sq.ft. Site Coverage: 14,231 s .ft. or 70% 15,497 s .ft. or % 2 0 1; 1 N: 0' S' 0.5' E: 8.5' W- 8' 1,312 sq.ft. gross (6,5%) 512 sq.ft. softscape (planting) 813 sq.ft. hardscape (pavi ng/decks) *Although the property currently has approximately 39986 sq.ft. of hardscape, only 813 square feet (or 20%) may be used for calculating the minimum landscaped area requirement. W, M As stated in the Zoning Code, the purpose of the CCII zone district is as follows St R A ff — es once. I It is the staff opinion that the proposed addition of a disability access ramp at the Lifthouse Lodge property complies with the purpose 401 statement of the CCII Zone District. The sub-area concept which is in the vicinity of the proposed outdoor dining deck modification is as follows (see attachment #3 for a map.of the area): Concept 18: Commercial expansion (one-story) to emphasize pedestrian level. Patio area enlarged slightly for additional dining space (a sun- pocket area), and wider, inviting steps which can also be used for sitting function. C. Cc Diiance with the Urban esic n Guide Considerations for Lions ea and Exterior Alteration Criteria The following design considerations are a critical element of the Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan. They identify the key physical characteristics of Lionshead and provide the tools to insure that new development is consistent with the established character. The design considerations include the following.- Height and Massing: The proposed disability access ramp, and associated modifications to the Montauk and Pizza Bakery outdoor dining decks, landscape planters and entry steps, will have no impact on the height and massing of the adjacent commercial spaces, 2. Roofing: The proposed disability access ramp will have no affect on the roofing of the adjacent commercial spaces. The proposed disability access ramp will have no affect on the facade of the adjacent commercial structures. 4. Facades - Transparency: The proposed disability access ramp will have no affect on the facade of the adjacent commercial structures. 5. Decks and Patios: sun M There are no accent elements associated with the addition of the proposed disability access ramp. • 5 8. Service and Delivery: Service and delivery functions for the Lifthouse Lodge will not change as a result of the addition of the proposed disability access ramp. The staff recommendation for approval of the minor exterior alteration includes the following conditions- 2. The TOV will remove existing perennials in the effected bed. The applicant shall be required to plant new perennials in the disturbed and new bed areas. The TOE! Park Superintendent will supply a plant list for the applicant to follow. All planting bed areas shall receive 12 inches of the following planting mix- 6 0 • f:\everyone\pec\memoMazier.424 7 t ff55 �� tts�f�j' m r I{ t r� P 0 0 PI A y-F c 1 1 In 's, lill pi (q:�_EAST SECTION N d krF [) t pa-, i vote. 2. A request for a conditional use to allow for a Type 11 Employee Housing Unit (EHU) to be located at 126 Forest Road/Lot 5, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Ron Byrne Planner: Lauren Waterton Lauren Waterton is absent. Jim Curnutte indicated Bill Reslock, the applicant's architect called just a short time ago and asked that the item be tabled. Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this item, second by Kevin Deighan, passed unanimously by a 5-0 vote. 3. A request for a minor exterior alteration in the CCII zone district and a landscape variance to allow for the addition of a disability access ramp located at the Lifthouse Lodge/549 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing. Gaalan Aasland stated they wish to start the project tomorrow. It is in the Town's interest and the business owners to have this ramp. The TOV actually owns the land where the ramp is proposed to be located (half of Bart & Yetti's deck). Bob Lazier would like to get approval on this solution, and then look at other possibilities. Bob Armour appreciates what Ross is saying, but doubts Town Council would pay to have the pavers raised and the mail regraded. Ross Davis questioned that if you are not building new space, no ADA improvements are required. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes April 24, 1995 3 Henry Pratt asked if we are providing access on Town property to the deck. What does the Town say about the access? Susan Connelly does not know the answers to these, but will find out. Henry asked, what if someone sues because of access, the TOV will be named. Jim Curnutte said there is nothing to prevent the TOV from being named in any suit. Henry Pratt wanted to know if the ramp is snow melted and who will maintain it. Lazier indicated it is not snow melted and it is on his property, so he will maintain it. Kevin Deighan applauds the ADA regulations. He felt the design needs to have snowmelting or some provision to keep the ramp clean. His experience with lifts is negative and he highly supports the ramp. 40 Greg Moffet is in favor of the ramp. Bowen amended his motion to add that the ramp be kept clear of snow by the applicant, second by Greg Moffet, passed unanimously by a 5-0 vote. Iq Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes April 24, 1995 4 Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department A request fora minor SDD amendment to allow for the expansion of the Cascade Club located in Area A of the Cascade Village SDD (SDD#4) 1295 Westhaven Drive. Applicant: Skip Berhhorst, representing L-0 Partnership Planner: Andy Knudtsen DE AIP"ION OF THE RE-QUEST 1® AMENDMENT PROCEDURE Section 18.40. 100 (Amendment Procedures) of the Municipal Code stipulates the following for minor amendments to Special Development Districts: "Minor Amendments: Minor modifications consistent with the design criteria outlined in Section 18,40,02013 may be approved the Department of Community Development. All minor modifications shall be indicated on a completely revised development plan. Approved changes shall be noted, signed, dated and filed by the Department of Community Development," Minor Amendments are further defined in Section 18,40.02013 with the following standar& "Minor Amendments (staff review) shall can modifications to building plans, site or landscape plans that do not alter the basic intent and character of the approved Special Development District, and are consistent with the decision criteria of this chapter, Minor Amendments may include, but not be limited to, or changes to gross floor area (excluding residential uses), of not more than 5% of the approved square footage of retail, office, commercial common areas and other non-residential fl oor area." Since the proposed request involves less than 5% of the gross floor area of the building, staff has determined that the proposal can be approved through the minor modification procedure. The Municipal Code stipulates the Community Development staff shall info rin the Planning and Environmental commission of the staff action on the application. III® DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS Total floor area of Cascade Club: 63,371.5 square feet 5% of total floor area: 3168.6 square feet Proposed floor area: 3168.0 square feet FUTURE ADDITIONS PROPOSED 4/24/95 REMAINING ALLOWED BY SDD DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CASCADE POTENTIAL CLUB Floor Area 4,500 sq. ft. 458 storage 1332 sq. ft. 989 clinic 1428 aerobics room 290 hallway 3168 Total sq. ft. Parking* 22.5 spaces already 0 storage 6.8 spaces provided i n s tructure for 4.9 clinic future addition. 10,8 aerobics room 0 hallway 15.7 Total Spaces *See section below for discussion of parking requirement, V. CRITERIA ANA_FVQ1_ The Community Development Department staff believes that there are two key criteria listed in the definition of Minor Amendment which apply to this request. These include- N A A. Basic Intent and Character of the Approved S 1. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment common neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and an orientation. Staff believes the proposed design is compatible to the immediate environment, As previously discussed, the architectural design of the addition is compatible with the existing building. It has been designed in such a way to minimize the changes to the appearance of the building. The materials to be used are also compatible with adjacent buildings in the vicinity. 2. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity, The uses will not change with the proposal. 3. Compliance with parking and loading requirements is outlined in Chapter 18.52. Staff recommends that the parking requirement be 10.8 spaces for the aerobics room. This rational is based on the fact that the SDD anticipated a 4500 sq. ft. addition for the • 3 It is important to note that the first two levels of the parking structure are under different ownership than the third level, Staff understands that the Westin, which owns the first two levels, has a lease for the use of the third level and is currently working on extend`ng this lease. 4. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and other design plans, Policy 1. 12 of the Land Use Plan states that "Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing development areas (infill areas)." Staff believes that the proposal is consistent with this policy, There will be no change to the site plan. 7. The circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation. 4 • 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping in an open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function, Staff docis t believe additional landscaping should be required as part of this project. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the Special Development District. Not applicable. Prior to issuance of temporary certificate of occupancy for the addition, the applicant shall construct a sidewalk from the entrance of the Cascade Club to the existing concrete pad located at the top of Westhaven Drive, across from the existing bus shelter, The side walk construction plans shall be submitted to the TOV Public Works Department for review and approval, prior to issuance of a building pen-nit for the addition, f.\everyone\pec\memo\cascade.424 0 5 V • i III ° Er"77"I'll, ll TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM- Community Development Department DATE: April 24, 1995 SUBJECT: A request for a worksession for a major amendment to the Cascade Village SDD to allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road West/Area D, Cascade Village SDD #4. Applicants- Gordon Pierce representing Glen Lyon Partnership Planner- Randy Stouder H 4 k Phase current 11 of the current proposal involves the construction of a second office 11ft-m- 9 I M. DESCRIPTION OF PREVIOUS SDD APPROVAL Staff has summarized the information from the Cascade Village SDD that pertains to Area D below: Site: Area D of the Cascade Village SDD Zoning- 8DD Area: 1.800 acres 2. The developer shall include in the building construction, energy and water conservation controls as general technology exists at the time of construction. 0 3 4 3. All parking structures shall have pollution control devices to prevent oil and dirt from draining into Gore Creek. 4. Protective measures shall be used during construction to prevent soil erosion into Gore Creek, particularly when construction occurs in Areas A and D. 5. A recreation amenities tax is to be assessed at a rate of 75 cents per square foot of floor area to be paid for each phase before the building permit is issued. IV. ZONING STATIRTIr- The development statistics for the proposed buildings in Area D (Phase I and 11) are shown belowe Allowed b S➢® Proposed Phase I Proposed Phase 11 Total (Phases I & II) Height: 51°% max. 40 feet 44 feel 31 feet N/A 49% max, 32 feet Setbacks: Per development plan: N: 2 feel N 18 feet N: 47 feel N/A S: 8 feel S: 31 feet S: 13 feet E: 30 feel E: 425 feel E: 22 feet W: 15 feel W 94 feel W: 580 feel Stream Setback: 50 feet from centerline 59 feel building 50 feel building N/A 50 feet on-grade parking 60 feet on-grade parking Site Coverage: 37% or 29,010.9 sq. ft. 8.3% or 6,551 sq. ft. 3.8% or 2,972 sq. fl. 12.1 % or 9,523 sq. h. Landscaping: 60% or 47,044.8 sq. ft. 62.9% or 49,345 sq. ft. 49.2% or 38,575 sq. ft. N/A Parking: Per Town of Vail regulations 77 spaces required 95 spaces required 7 short (Phase 1) (100 spaces enclosed) 70 spaces proposed, all 93 spaces proposed, all 2 short (Phase 11) Commercial Floor surface spaces surface spaces Area: 32,314 sq. ft. 19,234 sq. ft, (11,822 ex.). 3,757 sq. h. 22,991 sq. ft. Density: I free market DU allowed -0- 2 EHU's 2 EHU's 2 EHU's required GRFA: minimum size for the two -0- 488 sq. ft. 719 sq, ft. short employee units shall be sq ft —Aal 795 square feel and 976 sq. ft. 900 square feel. Common Area: 35% of 32,314 square feel 4,806 sq. ft. 1,181 sq. ft. 5,987 sq. ft, or 11,309.9 square feel Loading and Delivery: I berth required I berth I berth I berth 4 V. ISSUES FOR-DISCUSSION 1 . USE Is the exclusive use of office space on this site (with the addition of two employee housing units) appropriate? Staff believes that removing the micro-brewery from the SDD and replacing it with a large office building reflects the needs of the community at this time. 2. SITE PLAN - PHASE I A. aTREAMBANK PROTECTION Staff would like to see detailed plans showing the specific ways that buffers will be provided around the two eastern groupings of evergreen trees. Staff recognizes that the one or two trees located in the center of the site near the existing office building will be difficult to save. Staff believes that it is reasonable to remove these trees if the landscape plan R C. F RKIN • I 3. SITE PLAN - PHASE 11 A. aTREAMBANK PROTECTION C. BARKING 4. RHASING 19 0 5. LITY For the 1988 approval of the micro-brewery, building height standards were as follows: Maximum of 51% of the roof was allowed to range from 32 feet to 40 feet. A minimum of 49% of the roof was required to be less than 32 feet. 11 The criteria to be used to evaluate this proposal are the nine Special Development District (SDD) development standards set forth in the special development district chapter of the Zoning Code. As this is a worksession, staff has listed the SDD criteria (below) but will not evaluate each criteria at this time. The criteria are as follows: 9 :Neveryone\pec\memos\glob.424 • U] 10 I ll—,, &S rbe,K & A.mocl.t,,, A chlucu P.C,AJ.., m. WYbe9.ap I 2 Pro owd Road Section m � \� \ / \\ � \ \� \� . \�� ~� ®vapmeM AMwsaw Pa Sea THIRD FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSFD Iq P, W, tz M 1- ik M, M 1- ik M, _.SQUT�f Q EV�Tlglt_ Pmb I Wl,,,T EUVATION pl- SITE SECTION wz ( � � \ 1 x i L A6 "MU19 WIR =� pl"m Sgo'b"I & Asod.ft,, \ \� \: \ -� \\ I'll . . ....... WEST ELEVATION 11" w mwi �u I \ \ z / �� MEMQRANQM TO- Planning and Environmental Commission FROM- Community Development Department DATE: April 24,1995 SUBJECT: This is a request for a worksession to discuss proposed changes to the Vail Land Use Plan for 18 parcels of property throughout the TOV (as more fully described on Attachment #1 located at the end of this memorandum) from their current designations to the open space and the public/semi-public designations. Applicant, Town of Vail Planner: Jim Curnutte and Russ Forest IINNIBDD III N AND DE PLAN U" AMENDMENTS r� -0 Public/Semi-Publir (P(zrl% - the public and semi-public category includes I schools, post office, water and sewer service and storage facilities, cemeteriell municipal facilities, and other public institutions, which are located throughou the community to serve the needs of residents. I K A. By the Community Development Department B. By the PEC or Town Council Proposed changes by any of the three above mentioned applicants requires Am, demonstration as to 7 wafldn-�� ® DISCUSSION I-q5z1 11=- Since this is a worksession, there is no formal staff recommendation at this time. However, the staff has identified the following issues which we would like to discuss further with the PEC at the worksession.- 13 ilk fAeveryo ne\pec\memo\land use. 424 9 El ATTACHMENT I Ref Legal Description and T,.p;,ty owner Unique Features and __—Cteria3: How _Cn*rd. 1. Have Criteria 2, He,. Land Use Plan Address of property and Assessors Cornments/Hazarads conditions is the Plan in is the change Destination Parcel Number changed error to the Plan in FROM/TO concert with the Man in general 1 Unpatted land south of Town of Vail Steep area - needed for MDR/OS Courbide Townhomes 2101-124-00-00 south trail, #46 in OPL, 4.47 acres. Hazards: High rock fall and red snow avalanche. 2 Unplatted land south of Lots Town of Vail Steep hillside. 2.48 acres, LDR/OS LDR/OS 1-4, Block 2, Bighorn 1st 2101-111-00-00 Hazards: High hazard Addition debris flow and rockfall, red snow avalanche 3 Stream tract directly west of Town of Vail 1.73 acres. Hazards: None MDR/OS MDR/OS Pitkin Creek 2101-111-00-00 4 Stream Tracts B & E, Vail Vail Associates Stream tracts. Hazards: LDR/OS Village 11th Filing P.O. Box 7, Vail, Flood plain. CO 81658 5 Tract B, Vail Village 12th Filing Vail Associates Hazards: High rockfall, LDRIOS 2101-034-05-00 6 South half of Tract F, Vail Town of Vail Hazards: High debris LDR/OS Village 7th Filing. 2101-092-08-00 avalanche, medium rockfall and snow avalanche influence. 7 Tract A and Lots 9, 10, 11 Vail Town of Vail Hazard on-site. Hazards: LDR/OS Village 10th Filing - Fairway 2101-081-16-00 Medium rockfall, high Court debris avalanche, red snow avalanche. 8 Vail Interfaith Chapel, Vail Vail Religious Structure covers parcel MDR/PSP Road Foundation .277 acres. Hazards: 2101-071-09-00 None- 9 Lot 20A, Block 7, Vail Village Town of Vail Wetlands on property. LDR/OS 1st Filing, 274 Beaver Dam 2101-071-13-00 Hazards: None. Rd. 10 Tracts A, Vail Lionshead 2nd Town of Vail Stream Tract Middle Creek RAS A TAIOS Filing 2101-064-07-02 runs through it. Hazards: and None. 2101-064-07-00 11 Tract A, Vail Village 2nd Filing Town ofVail Hazards: None. TA/OS 2101-064-07-01 12 Tracts C, Vail Lionshead 2nd Town ofVail Stream Tract Middle Creek MDR/OS Filing 2101-064-07-02 runs through it. Hazards: and None. 2101-064-07-00 13 Tract B, Vail Lionshead lot Town of Vail Stream Tract. Hazards: TC/Cis Filing No parcel #. Flood plain. 14 Tract B, Vail Potato Patch Vail Associates May make good pocket LDR/OS 2101-063-01-03 park. Hazards: High rock fal i. LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS OS = Open Space TA = Transition Area MDR = Medium Density Residential R = Resort Accomadation & Service LDR = Low Density Residential TC = Tourist Commercial P = Park SR = Ski Base PSP = Public Semi Public VMP = Vail Master Plan MOUNTAIN MFADOVIS ,:tt:L 2uKr L;HEEK MEADOWS RIVERBEND 8 4857 4897• 4846 4876 4916 2 3 4 TRACT D a 1 0 DI' 4768 816 IF H A DIT 19 184819 17 4799 83 16 TRACT C 2 48-1 4778 0 4791 1 1 4,OC 3 4 4828 4782 4788 2 TOUNROUSES 5 4640 SUBDIVISION 4792 6 4802 7 4612 4818 9 IC 4822 48422 ti TOWN OF VAIL BOUNDARY mum (D 3035 CONDO'S. BOOTH FALLS 13th. FILING 5 6 I 13 0 3094 303! Q G 2965 2975 TRACT C 4 2985 2945 14 0 308 3 93 9 2960 15 10 9 8 3019 3100 3115 16 2 3145 RESHRniviSION OF LOT 72 L 2 92 2940 3015 7 3120 Il — 3275 VA IL VILLAGE 12th. FILING 4 '765 3 10 2920 17 3011 6 (D 2785 2 TH CREEK 2805 BOOEEK ® 3130 is 10 326 TOWNHOUSES 3 5 4 TRACT A oyy 0282 1 3140 3150 9 a 245 2875 2900 TRACT B 3255 3235 C 5 RD 11 12 TRACT B 3241 P, 3010 3236 VAIL MOUNTAIN 4 SCHOOL TRACT C 1 2 3 a 3160 3220 3226 3230 'LOT 2 -AGE INTERS E 70 TRACT E URNAROUND HICLE NOT IN T.O.V. (IN T.O.V.) 1 2 1 2 4 0 RACT A ASP "/v 855 2865 2925 2945 2905 10 9 3130 12 8 17 CREEK 2990 3295 4 5 3 10 3030 3110 6 7 8 3050 3070 309 G 807 3 1u lb 850 2880 2 13 840 1 1 ell 289 2930 14 15 292 282 283 TRACT B VAILVILLAGE 11th. FILING 2910 TRACT C 0 UNPLATTED RESUBDIVISION OF TRArT F 1L® VILLAGE Ilth. FILING jNPLATTIED ti TOWN OF VAIL BOUNDARY mum \/All RC)l IMARY MEMEMM INTERSTATE 70 ( NOT IN T.O�V. ) sNOR [EE1 1309 UNPLATTED 1289 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE TOWN OF VAIL MAINT, SHOP IL ILL 8th. FILING TENNIS COURTS LLEY I t El 1 �K 0= 2 1337 3 PARK 1055 1 6 m5 1 111111163 1183 4 1 1307 1297 EAST VAIL WATER 967 SANITATICN BLD TRACT 1031 104 1 2 4 0 04 3 05 8 9 10 0 1193 0 125 1153 a 3 2 22 C0 00! 5 10,45 Lu 7 Q H04 1287 1328 1 207 1054 4 1106SILVERCI C 9 10 14 TRACT FD OR AMPITHEATER I Z, 6 1022 1157 1187 IIQ7 1136 12, 13 1195 fts3 E NATURE A 1 f,7 6 vpLLF-( OR 2 C, 1024 1081 CENTER 601 1012 6 y 1014 1250 1278 620 4 992 '1 A- 4 PARCEL E 4 3 2 24 GOLF COURSE MAINT 8 SOCCER FIELD 3 TRACT D 1220 TRACT A 994 2 996 5 1200 170 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 F )RTE A 998 1017 1 7 1 7 1119 1 1 1150 7 VAGE 7 VAIL ILL th. FILING 5 965 97 3 5 PARCEL D F' 1 2 2 1 925 FAIRWAY 04 990 E 10t F1 IN 9 8 7 920 930 6 5, 950 970 4ij, UNPLATTED MOUNTAIN BELL NE SOLAR 150 r VAIL 14 9 I ABC SCHOOL, ®E LEARNING TREE h10UlyrAlN LL R ®. 129 dIN T.O:V.3 TR E p II�LI ING VAN GE I PARKING POI T STRUCTURE VAIL C N 71 61� WEST- 508 I E i® IFITERNATi WINDS 548 1 395 I I I 4 250 300 HELIPAD d o LION U B LE TREE VAIL 125 Il� �IIL I soo VAIL + 5 I , LiF555 52ii T LIONSHEAD Cl CLE TR F ICE ARENA FILING 113 555 g 30NSHEAD 7 450 {com 321 �/ 2 PO ICE C ,erci�i) RCADE fi C 0 OFFICES �9MAIN VAIL 531 LODGE AT LI N HEAD TRACT A 75 EXIT �D REETOPS ACT J GONDOLA 7�_ 6 L1 AR VAIL b00 452 292 F E 28i NAT'L BA K 4 LIONSHEAD CENT \ I VAIL VALLEY VAIL CENTER 2 BLDG. SCOR 10 IO8 121 DSKAAL HOLIDAY INN 52 Gp R5 1 i 1 13 a 9 HOUSE ALPHORN ANDAR GATEwA 1 TRA D UrPLATTED 272 �ES7 TRACT B 2B2 7 MEADOW 141 121 DR. C 4528 A LOT 0 12 N 50 SQUAR j �° 232 I I OLIDAY VAIL VILLAGE 1NIV AGE 30 l _ fi 5 212 182 4 3142 322 2 162 1 HOUSE 100 M 82 I ARCADE °°�✓ 44 5 ,CT A 381 cap c;�cL€ 362 �2 5 525 FOREST AD FIRIE 15 MEADOW DEPT. EAST —SONNEIALP �s LIONSHEAD ® 352! ILL 6 TRACT B VA PL 42 6 TOT LOT 401 330 41 AO VILLA Is! SKIER BRIDGE 63 275 39 38 37 36 CORTIN BANK 22 6 3 3 cl 4 3D 343 333 265 223 i93 153 123 i 17 �,` eAVA H5 0 IA ® 443 429 24 27 R R SE ENNIS o 5 9 10 19 23 184 154 28 + 84 ! TRACT aJRTS 463 7 374 354 344 324 31 3 fi 394 25 2C 21 25 22 26 29 64 1 1 SWOP 43 T 434 1 16 265 IS5 30 115 32 WILLOW 3 2 454 42 375 285 353 325 226 186 966 FOR 95 `5 315 9 ILL ® ! 2 327 178 12 19 i7 1 7 9 8 6 ® 346 ` 5 35 44 B 7 3 2 586 556 ! TRACT A 1 486 6 5 4 3 2 307' 26 338 14C 227 13217 3 2 �7 L1 4645 446 424 416 366 1 1Fa 15 !� 67 �7 f27 87 107 1 298 i8 1 2 3 7 8 6 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 813 $15 814 8 70-8 796 794 792 794 788 786 764 782 P� & 806 5 80 769 23 22 76s 17 , 32 28 27 26 25 24 . A 21 7& _ 81! 799 797 795 793 791 V �lx �t � 781 16 -30 29 A\b \, 1 0. 20 807 805 \ t \� 778 i POTATO 34`'x' X11 PATCH '775 16 ?6i 33 -- TRACT A 765 6 7 70 ra is RED _ RESUBMiSION OF SANDSTONE ROAD 2 3 a 5 s' 2 10 11 12 ? VAIL POTATO PA! 7 7 s o 772 774 776 PARCEL A TRACT D 3EE SHEET 5 POTATO PATCH DR. TRACT C czar �c�� YF s 3 754 5 758 1L POTATO F:AT CH 2 6 ! 7 4 756 SEA FILING ° _ 2 °c �-�-y� 738 " 736 748 s 29 "`'� 31 740 Ea °5D t9 !P�k 3 2 RESTAURANT 742 744 I 746 SANDY LANE �--�f s Fo co POTATO PATCH 6LK. l CLUB 13 (/) RED SANDSTONE ELEMENTARY SOLAR VAIL to 46 ` 5 UNPLATTED 551 t 3 PHASE ASE INTERSTATE 70 31 PHASE PHASE {@N T.OeV.I IV 25 PEDESTRIAN R E 897 695 3® I SUtd VAIL OVERPASS S 5 PHASE V VAN GE 2 PARKING 6 996 7 899 6 69 CREST® POI T 508 I STRUCTURE SANDSTONE NORTH DAY ' } WINDS PARKING LOT ` �� 1 ! p � f 395 t 4 10 TOT LOT LION I InNRHEAQ 5oo VAIL f i I 7 @ . 4 LIFTHOUSE LAN 'ARK 2t 52t j T L @ONSHE Ci CIE F 5 12 C N E705 PL 610 2— 555 3 TR QZD 45® ICE AREt 86 I 7DTR T F ® 616 IONSHEAD RGADE 6(c�m erc @ill 7 321 i t 531 LODGE AT LI N FJcAD 0 VAIL SPA - A4ONTA SL'N61RD GONDOLA t75 600 REETOPS TR J 6 452 L RARY' - 292 . 7V _,