Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1995-0508 PEC
yyr > ' carp - ! , , I(TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of ,»© wn of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the jnicipal Code of the Town of Vail on May 8,1995, at 200 P.M. in the Town of Vail cipal Building. In consideration of: A request for a conditional use permit to allow an outdoor dg deck to be located adjacent to the Garton's Saloon located at 143 East Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block ».<2: Village 1st Filing. Applicant Dave Garton Planner Randy Stouder 2. A request bra zone change from National Area Preservation District to General Use District to allow for a renovation to the Vail Recreation District office, located k] /78V%| Valley Drive /Parcel E, Vail Village 7h Filing. TACK NT I El Property LegaJ Description and Properly owner Unique Features and Current Proposed Land Use Number Address of property and Assessors Commenis/Hazarads Zoning Zoning Plan Parcel Number Destination From./To 4 Unpatled land south of Town of Vail Steep area - needed for south AOS NAPD MDR/OR Courlside Townhomes 2101- 124 -00 -00 trail. 446 in OPL, 4.47 acres, Hazards: High rock fall and red snow avalanche. 7 Unplatled land south of Town or Vail Steep hillside. 2.48 acres, AOS NAPD LDR/OR Lots 1-4, Block 2, Bighorn 2101-111-00-00 Hazards: High hazard debris 1 at Addition flow and rockfall, red snow avalanche 9 Stream Tract directly east Town of Vail 1.73 acres. Hazards: None GU OR MDR/OR of Piikin Creek 2101-;11-00 -00 14 Stream Tracts B & E, Vail Vail Associates Stream tracts. Hazards: Flood ACTS LDR/OS Village 1 '1 th Filing P.O. Box 7, Vail, plain. CO 8 658 ]NAPD 17 Traci B, Vail Village 121h Vail Associates Hazards: High rockfall. AOS NAPD LDR/OS Filing 2101-034-05-00 24 South half of Traci F, Vail Town of Vail Hazards: High debris avalanche, P/S NAPD LDR/OS Village 71h Filing. 2101-092-08-00 medium rockfall and snow avalanche influence. 25 Traci A and Lois 9, 10, 11 Town of Vail Hazard on-she. Hazards: AOS NAPD LDR/OS Vail Village 10th Filing - 2101-081-16-00 Medium rockfall, high debris Fairway Court avalanche,.red snow avalanche. 32 Vail Interfaith Chapel, Vail Vail Religious Structure covers parcel .277 AOS GU W1DR/PSP Road Foundation acres. Hazards: None. 2101-071-09-00 34 Lot 20A, Block 7, Vail Town of Vail Wetlands on property. Hazards: PS OR LDR/OS Village 1st Filing, 274 2101-071-13-00 None. Beaver Dam Rd. 35 Tracis, A, Vail Lionshead Town of Vail Stream Tract Middle Creek runs AOS NAPD RAS& 2nd Filing 2101-064-07-02 through it. Hazards: None. TA/OR and 2101-064-07-00 36 Traci A, Vail Village 2nd Town of Vail Hazards: None. AOS OR TA/OS Filing 2101-064-07-01 Tracts C, Vail Lionshead Town of Vail Siream Traci Middle Creek runs ADS NAPD MDR/OR 2nd Filing 2101-064-07-02 through it. Hazards: None. [37 and 2101-064-07-00 38 Tract B, Vail Lionshead Town of Vail Stream Traci. Hazards: Flood AOS NAPD TC/OS 1st Filing No. parcel plain. 45 Tract B, Vail Potato Patch Vail Associates May make good pocket park. AOS OR LDR/OS; 2101-063-01-03 Hazards: High rock fall. LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS OS = Open Space TA = Transition Area MDR = Medium Density Residential PAS = Resort Accomadation & Service LDP = Low Density Residential TC = Tourist Commercial P = Park SP = Ski Base PSP = Public Semi Public VMP = Vail Master Plan E3 w " T T T T 13 May 8,1995 AGENDA prwgfd���� 11:00 am. Site Visits 12:30 p.m. 1 . West Vail all 2. Ford Park - Alpine Garden ® 1278 Vail Valley Drive - Golf Course Maintenance Facility 40 5194 Main Gore Drive South, Henault U I 6. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for exterior seating at the West Vail Mail located at 2151 North Frontage Road/Lot 2A, Vail Das Schone, Third Filing, Applicant: West Vail all Corporation Planner Randy Stouder 7. A request for a work session for an amendment to the Ford Park Master Plan to allow for an expansion to the Betty Ford Alpine Garden located at 183 Gore Creek Drive/ An unplatted parcel of land located in the Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, described as follows: MEOMMEEME Planner: George Ruther 8. A request fora work session for a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor dining deck at the Daily Grind Coffee Company located at 288 Bridge Street/Lot 13, Block 5H, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: The Daily Grind Coffee Company Planner: George Rother 90 A request for a parking variance and conditional use permit to allow for a temporary building to house a laboratory for the Vail Valley Medical Center, located at 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E & F, Vail Village Second Filing, Applicant Vail Valley Medical Center represented by Dan Feeney Planner: Randy Stouder TABLED INDEFINITELY 9. Approval of the April 24, 1995 PEC meeting minutes. 10. Selection of a PC Chairman. 11. Selection of a PEC Vice-Chairman. 12. Selection of a PC member to the Housing Authority Board MEMQRANDUM 11 0 TO Planning and Environmental Commission SUBJECT: A request to change the Vail Land Use Plan for 17 parcels of property throughout the Town of Vail (see Attachment #1, located at the end of this memorandum for legal descriptions) from their current Land Use Plan designations to the Open Space and Public/Semi-Public designations. Applicant: Town of Vail Planners Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest en Resort Accommodations and3ervice RAS - this area includes activities aimed at accommodating the overnight and short term visitor to the are Primary uses include hotels, lodges, service stations and parking structures (with densities up to twenty-five is dwelling units or fifty accommodation units per buildable acre). These areas are oriented owat veniculaf acciEss TrZUM=TT-'7 r sTppofrc - 7MT - Ief7MT - 7 - M *07177-ss serTICeS included. Also allowed in this category, would be institutional uses and various municipal uses. 0 !I. BACKGROUND Staff has reviewed the 17 properties proposed for Land Use Plan designation changes and compared them to the above listed criteria. We have grouped many of the properties into the same category, upon determining that they have similar features as compared to the Land 2 - 6 - 6 Plan amendment criteria. The following list demonstrates how each of the properties meet the criteria necessary for changing their current Land Use Plan designations: ©«© §7«±222£ §ons changed since the Plan was-adQpted? Staff believes that with regard to the following property, conditions have changed since the Plan was originally adopted H 2. How is the-plan in error? - Staff believes that the following properties have current Land Use Plan designations which were adopted in error, when considering the uses and/or characteristics of a specific property that existed at the time each received it'<<» nd Use Plan designation: El apply the Medium Density Residential Land Use Plan designation to the property. Although there is a bus stop building located on this property, it is not a concern to staff to change the Land Use Plan designation of the property to Open Space since "public uses" are allowed in the Open Space land use designation. Reference #4. Stream Tracts B and E, Vail Village 1 1th Filing, were established on the Final Plat for the purpose of providing for the uninterrupted flow of Booth Creek through this subdivision. Although the Land Use Plan designation of these tracts, as well as the entire neighborhood, is Low Density Residential, it is an error to apply a Residential Land Use designation to these specific tracts. 5 Emism ERR Ref Legal Description and Property owner Unique Features and CRITERIA FOR CHANGING THE PLAN Land Use # Address of property and Assessors Comments/Hazarads Demonstrate how conditions have changed since the Plan TC = Tourist Commercial Parcel Number = Park Plan was adopted, how the Plan is in error, or how the Destination PSP = Public Semi Public VMP = Vail Master Plan addition, deletion or change to the Plan is in concert FRCS /TO with the Plan in general. I Unpatted land south of Town of Vail Steep area - needed for Parcel located in high hazard rockfall zone and a red hazard MDR/OS Courlside Townhomes 2101-124-00-00 south trail. #46 in OPL, snow avalanche. Land Use Plan did not consider the site 4.47 acres. Hazards: High constraints associated with this property and therefore this rock fall and red snow parcel received a residential Land Use Plan designation in avalanche. error, 2 Unplatted land south of Lots Town of Vail Steep hillside. 2.48 acres, Parcel located in several high hazard areas. Land Use Plan LDR/OS 1-4, Block 2, Bighorn 1st 2101-111-00-00 Hazards: High hazard did not consider the site constraints accosiated with this Addition debris flow and rockfall, property and therefore this parcel received a residential Land red snow avalanche Use Plan designation in error, 3 Stream tract directly west of Town of Vail 1.73 acres. Hazards: None This stream tract is the 100-year floodplam. Land Use Plan MDR/OS Pitkin Greek 2101-111-00-00 did not consider the site constraints associated with this property and therefore this parcel recieved a residential Land Use Plan designation in error. 4 Stream Tracts B & E, Vail Vail Associates Stream Tracts. Hazards: This is a stream tract in the 100-year floodplain. Land Use LDR/OS Village 11th Filing P.O. Box 7, Vail, Flood plain. Plan did not consider the site constraints associated with this CO 81658 property and therefore this parcel recieved a residential Land Use Plan designation in error. 5 Tract B, Vail Village 12th Filing Vail Associates Hazards: rockfall. High rockfall. falL Parcel located in a rockfall area and does not meet the LDR/OS 2101-034-05-00 minimum lot frontage and size requirements for a developable lot, Land Use Plan did not consider the site constraints asscociated with this property and therefore this parcel received a residential Land Use Plan designation in error. 6 South half of Tract F, Vail Town of Vail Hazards: High debris Parcel located in several high hazard areas. Land Use Plan LDR/OS Village 7th Filing. 2101-092-08-00 avalanche, medium did not consider the site constraints associated with this rockfall and snow property and therefore this parcel received a residential Land avalanche influence. Use Plan designation in error. 7 Tract A and Lots 9, 10, 11 Vail Town of Vail Hazard on-site. Hazards: Parcel located in several high hazard areas. Land Use Plan LDR/OS Village 101h Filing - Fairway 2101-081-16-00 Medium rockfall, high did not consider the site constraints associated with this Court debris avalanche, red property and therefore this parcel received a residential Land snow avalanche. Use Plan designation in error. 8 Vail Interfaith Chapel, Vail Vail Religious Structure covers parcel The use of the site for religious services and functions is MDR/PSP Road Foundation .277 acres, Hazards: more consistent with the Public/Semi-Public designation. 2101-071-09-00 None. 9 Lot 20A, Block 7, Vail Village Town of Vail Wetlands on property. Site has wetlands and restrictive covenants slating that the LDR/OS 1st Filing, 274 Beaver Dam 2101-071-13-00 Hazards: None, parcel shall stay in a open space use. Land Use Plan did not Rd. consider the site constraints associated with this property and therefore this parcel received a residential Land Use Plan designation in error. 10 Tracts A, Vail Lionshead 2nd Town of Vail Stream Tract Middle Creek This is a stream tract in the 100-year floodplain. Land Use RAS & Filing 2101-064-07-02 runs through it. Hazards: Plan did not consider the site constraints associated with this TA/OS and None. property and therefore this parcel received a RAS and TA 2101-064-07-00 Land Use Plan designation in error. 11 Tract A, Vail Village 2nd Filing Town of Vail Hazards: None. This is a stream tract in the 100-year floodplain. Land Use TA/OS 2101-064-07-01 Plan did not consider the site constraints associated with this property and therefore this parcel received a TA Land Use Plan designation in error. 12 Tracts C, Vail Lionshead 2nd Town of Vail Stream Tract Middle Greek This is a stream tract in the 100-year floodplain. Land Use MDR/OS Filing 2101-064-07-02 runs through it. Hazards: Plan did not consider the site constraints associated with this and None. property and therefore this parcel received a MDR Land Use 2101-064-07-00 Plan designation in error, 13 Tract B, Vail Lionshead 1st Town of Vail Stream Tract. Hazards: This is a stream tract parcel. Land Use Plan did not TC/OS Filing No parcel #. Flood plain. consider the site constraints associated with this property and therefore this parcel received a TC Land Use Plan designation in error. LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS OS = Open Space TA = Transition Area MDR = Medium Density Residential RAS = Resort Accomadation & Service LDR = Low Density Residential TC = Tourist Commercial P = Park SB = Ski Base PSP = Public Semi Public VMP = Vail Master Plan • -� _• • ION - O F LOT 2,90 CSC -2 CD :5035 GE 121h. FILING 600TH FALLS 13th. FILING 5 6 13 (D 3031 VILLAGE 12th® FILING TRACT C 2965 2975 4 2945 - 2i985 14 0 308 3 a 93 2960 15 10 9 a 309 3100 3115 2 2 9 16 3145 RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 7, BLI 2) 92 940 10 3015 7 3120 3275 VAIL VI AGE 12th. FILING 4 65 3 (D 2920 17 3011 0 6 2785 2 2805 BOOTH CREEK 3130 18 10 326 TOWNHOUSES 0282 1 4 3140 3150 9 8 TRACT A (D 2875 2900 TRACT B 3255 3245 3235 Ell 5 LLD (D RD 0 11 3010 12 TRAC B 3249 3236 VAIL MOUNTAIN 4 SCHOOL TRACT C 1 2 3 3160 3220 3226 3230 7 9 LOT 2 RESUKIVISION OF T ACT --;7 AG E� VAIL VILLAGE 11 th. FILING INTERSTATE 70 INTERSTP TrE 0 TRACT E EMERGENCY VEHICLE TURNAROUND (NOT IN T.O.V-) IN T.O.V.) 1 855 4Sp 1 2 --4 2� RACT A 0 1 ,V 2865 2925 2945 29 5 9 313 0 t41 12 e CREEK 4 5 6 7 $ 3110 17 807 295 3 3 10 3030 305 3070 309 4j 850 2880 840 1 ago 26 2930 14 15 � 3 82 283 TRACT B VAIL VILLAGE I I th. FILING 2910 TRACT C 9 UNPLATTED RESUBDIVISION OF TRArT P VAIL VILLAGE I. FILING IPLATTED TOWN OF VAIL BOUNDARY mm mmommummum UAIL BONDARY UNPLAT TED NATURE CENT ER 2 ��t5 �,I�z4 1081 � 31f! 2 1092 � VAt LE 001 2 1014 1250 1278 �Q 620 !PA`s PARCEL E ® X 992 4 ! TRACT �• 2 2 GOLF COURSE MAINT. SOCCER FIELD - 1220 TRACT A 994 �,�p 12 P .170 996 ! 2 3 4 5 6 3 1 2 F RTE A 99a3 8017 1 7 1 7 1199 1150 IL VILLAGE 7th. FILI 965 5 PARCEL D C.� 6\ Z 1 ..� � 925 FAIRWAY b � e aa+s w �'�� UNPLATTED P OUNTAW BELL IN TO Planning and Environmental Commission DATE: March 27, 1995 SUBJECT: A request for a zone change from the Natural Area Preservation District to the General Use District for the Vail Golf Course Maintenance Facility located at 1278 Vail Valley Drive/ Parcel E, Vail Village 7th Filing. INTRODUCTION acquired from the Forest Service in 1994. As part of the open space zoning changi o that Town staff is working on, this site was identified as needing to be rezoned to General Use, which would allow for a maintenance facility as a conditional use. The VRD is proposing to change the zoning from Natural Area Preservation to General Use. The property's zoning identifies the uses I permitted by right, and the conditional uses. Attachment 3 identifies the permitted and conditional uses for each District. The following is a brief description of the NAP and GU districts Natural Area PreservatiQn District This district is intended to protect sensitive natural areas such as wetlands, riparian areas, wildlife habitat, and high hazard areas. The only permitted use in this district is nature preserve. Trails are is allowed as a conditional use. This is the most restrictive zone district in the Town of Vail. proposed by the applicant as part of a conditional use permit application. Site specific development standards shall be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission during the review of the conditional use request. I Is the existing zoning suitable with the existing land use on the site anif- adjacent land uses? I J This project will not negatively or positively affect community growth. The rezoning will allow the maintenance facility to make needed improvements to improve operations, facility aesthetics, and to protect the environment. This proposed amendment would be in concert with the Land Use Plan's goals. A goal of the Land Use Plan (on page 6) is to protect the quality of the environment. A major is reason for the VRD's request is to make improvements to its fuel storage which will n 292 W. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 303-479-2279 FAX: 303-479-2197 ADM WISTRATIVE OFFICES 479-2450 GOLF & PARK MAINTENANCE 1278 Vail Valley Drive 479-2262 395 E Lionshead Circle 479-2292 V Vail Valley Drive 479-2291 ATTACHMENT #1 Vail Planning and Environmental Commission 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Commissioners, if you have any comments or questions, feel free to call me at 479-2262, 8260.0' ROOF 6272. APPROX, OMjNE- OF RED ZONE EDGE OF MEELINE lboi m ATTACHMEMT #3 OPEN SPACE ZONE DISTRICTS Natural Area Outdoor Recreation Agriculture Open Space Preservation 03 El Conditional A) Equestrian Trails A) Public parks and A) Any use within public A) Public theaters, meeting Uses B) Paved and Unpaved active public outdoor parks, recreation areas, and rooms, convention facilities Trails recreation areas and open spaces which involves B) Public parking facilities C) Interpretive nature uses excluding assembly of more than 200 C) Public transportation walk buildings, people together in a building terminals D) Picnic tables and B) Equestrian trails or group of buildings D) Public utilities installation informal seating C) Ski lifts, tows, runs B) Public and private including transmisssion lines E) Parking when used in D) Cemetaries schools E) Water and sewage conjunction with a E) Well water C) Churches, rectories, and treatment plants permitted or conditional treatment facilities related structures F) Public and quasi public use D) Private golf, tennis, indoor community facility F) Other uses customarily swimming and riding clubs G) Public building and incidental to permitted or E) Semi-public and grounds conditional uses institutional uses such as H) Public and private schools convents and religious 1) Public and private parks and retreats active outdoor recreation F) Ski lifts & tows areas, facilities, and uses G) Cemetaries J) Golf Courses H) Low power radio facilities K. Ski lifts, tows, and runs 1) Well water treatment L) Churches facility M) Hospitals, medical and dental facilities, rehabilitation centers, clinical pharmacy, and ambulance facilities N) Equestrian trails 0) Public tourist/ guest service related facilities P) Plant and tree nurseries Q) Major Arcade R) Helipad S) Type III EHU T) Type IV E U) Seasonal structures V) Accessory uses to a parking structure W, flo May 8,1995 MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT 1 A request to amend the Vail Land Use Plan for 16 properties through© ©` © Town of Vail. Fifteen properties are proposed to ©e changed from their current designation to open space and one property would be changed to the public/ semi-public designation. See Attachment 1 for legal descriptions. Applicant: Town of Vail Planners: Jim Curnutte and Russell Forrest 177=1 maae a «« Tor a zone Mange Trorn Mars, 7, w»?: 7777 - »« 2 « 10 U District be approved, second b: ? « «»W »«?» passed unanimously b: a<2: of 5-0-1, with Bob Armour abstaining. 3. A request for a conditional use to © « fora Type 11 Employee Housing Unit (EHU) to located at 126 Forest Road/Lot 5, Block 7, ?ail 1 st Filing. i Applicant: < «B Planner: Lauren Waterton Lauren Waterton reviewed this issue with the Board and staff is recommending approval. Bi Reslock, the architect, was present. Bill Reslock and Jay Pet _se ted the model and drawings for this property. Lauren Waterton expl?« ®:« a! are 5 indoor parking spaces, and 3 outdoor parking spaces. The Board wants the employee housing unit residents to park indoors. ppq�i��Iip Jill Ii i I I I Bob Armour asked for public input. There was none. The Board members had no further questions or concerns regarding this project. «: 2O» TIMMUM 6. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for exterior seating at the West Vail iTall located at 2151 North Frontage Road/Lot 2A, Vail Das Schone, Third Filing. Applicant: West Vail Mall Corporation Planner: Randy Slouder 7. A request for a worksession for an amendment to the Ford Park Master Plan to allow for an expansion to the Betty Ford Alpine Garden located at 183 Gore Creek Drive/ An unplatted parcel of Iand located in the Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, described as follows: Applicant: Betty Ford Alpine Gardens represented by Helen Fritch Planner: George Rather Todd Oppenheimer stated all the land available for parking in Ford Park has already been developed into parking. Trying to develop parking in the lower bench contradicts the goals of reducing access to F:\everyone\pec\rninutes\050895 the lower bench. Todd said the TOV is starting to make a new master plan for Ford Park incorporating highway access and possibly a parking structure at Ford Park, with better access to Ford Park from other parking structures. The number of spaces required for the gardens is so small (3-6 spaces) that it is almost a moot point. George Ruther stated staff does have parking use statistics for Ford Park and can present these at the next meeting. Todd Openheimer stated the TOV does not maintain the road to the lower bench during the winter. They prefer not to maintain this road. He would like to see an access route from the parking lot, through the tennis building to the education garden center. If this route is taken the Town of Vail would not have to maintain the road. Dalton Williams said access should come from above and it should handle deliveries. He is not willing to give access on the road. It is a detriment to have any vehicles in the park. Handicap access should be from up above. Dalton wants the applicants to give their proposals for the access, instead of them asking PEC where it should go. Jeff Bowen feels it is a community park with lots of amenities and he feels it should be accessible. He does not have the access solutions, but it needs to be solved for disabled access and deliveries. Greg Moffet agrees with Jeff Bowen. Greg Amsden is leery of the western access road - it is a dead -end. He wants the applicants to use the parking on top. In winter there should be designated garden parking. Helen Fritch agrees access is a big concern - the placement of the building will not change no matter what the access resolution is. She does not want the building process held up due to access. F:\everyone\pm\n-dnutes\050895 Jeff Bowen and Dalton Williams feel this is a great building. Henry Pratt said the applicant did a wonderful job with the design and the impact is minimal. Greg Amsden and Greg Moffet like the design. RM Greg Moffet is excited about the uses. He would like the office to stay as limited as possible. Greg Amsden wants the off ice minimized and allow for no expansion of the off ice or retail. Henry Pratt and Dalton Williams, Jeff Bowen and Bob Armour all want office and retail spaced restricted. Bob Armour stated the Fire Department and Public Works do have concerns with this project. Todd Oppenheimer stated the Master Plan revision and the garden request should not go on 0 F:\e% nutesl,050895 Chris Chantler, owner and Fred Otto, attorney were present. George Ruther reviewed the request with the PEC and reminded the PEC that the applicant has previously made a request of the PEC and Staff recommended denial. George stated the applicant has not made any changes to their previous request. pil 1��I;; I 111 111111" 114011 VIM George stated Public Works is concerned about the amount of trash that is produced in this area. Public Works had put out additional trash receptacles in this area and the applicant wanted this removed. Henry Pratt stated substantial improvement from what was submitted previously. Establishes area of control and activity, also provides access to Sun glass Hut. Not PE 's role to handle disputes between tenants. Jeff felt the changes were a substantial improvement from the last submittal. Will reserve judgement F:\everyone\pecVninute,9\050995 on the Sunglass Hut and wait until !hey have representation. Concern he has is that this area is very tight. To tighten this area up further with more fencing is a concern. He has a concern with green chairs and the white chairs. Suggests a fiberglass wood covered chairs and wrought iron tables. Town has a plethora of Wal-Mart type chairs and tables and he feels that the Town has enough. Would like to see wooden chairs or tables. Pam Brandmeyer clarified that the State liquor law has been loosened. The concern she has is ingress and egress off and on the patio deck. It will be difficult to see the entire deck, and she asked that a full time person be stationed out on the deck. Fred Otto stated that the fence is 36" high. Bob Armour added that this is a better plan, however, metal tables are preferred. He still has a problem with the whole concept, stating Section 18.60.06 would not be detrimental to health, safety and welfare, but would be injurious to properties in the vicinity. M F:\everyone,pec\minutes',050895 EME22= fflzyy > :. IMIRM #2222; 1 in September and #d *2>© of 1992, the Town Council passed Ordinances 9 and 27, Series of 1992, to create a new Chapter 18.57 - Employee Housing, to provide for the addition of Employee Housing Units (EHUs) as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts within the Town of Vail. The definition in that ordinance states: both year-round and seasonal local residents. The proposed unit will have a positive impact on the Town's housing needs. 2. The effect of the use on light and air. distribution Of population. transr)ortation facilities, A es schools arks and remeation facilifies and other publiQ facilities ne0s. It is likely that there would be one additional vehicle associated with th residence. Staff feels that this would be an insignificant imp, 94 criteria. 4. Effect uoon the character of the area in which thg prgpoogsged ua -usae-i ion to surroundina uses. The scale and bulk of the existing structure is very similar to those in existence in the surrounding neighborhood. Since the proposed employee housing unit will be located within the building, it would not appear to have a negative effect on the scale and bulk of the residence in relation to surrounding uses. b. It shall b ermi niv on lots which Comply with minimum lot ihg_p_�� - - size r eauirerents of the gone district in which the lot is lo cate d. At 15,730 square feet in size, the lot meets the minimum lot size requirements in the Primary/Secondary zone district. 0 r ce or eliminated. The proposed Type 11 EHU will be located within the primary/secondary residence. E] 9. No more than two L2) adults and one (1 1 child not older than is EH No more than_lWoA2 adults and t«© 1 21 children not older ro » m Tvoe 11 EHU. I Since this unit is a one (1) bedroom Type 11 EHU, the 22« ? : » «: < -2 < regulation will be complied with. 0 5 health, safety or welfare. Finding B3 is met, in staff's opinion, as the proposal complies with all of Nam SUBJECT: A request for a front setback variance to allow for the construction of a second story addition onto an existing residence located at 5194 Main Gore Drive South/Lot 16, Vail Meadows First ng. Applicant: Philip and Bonnie Henault Planner: Randy Stouder Lot Area: N/A 30,274 sq.ft. No Change Height: 33 ft. 31 ft. No Change GRFA: 6,114 sq. t 2,304 sq. ft. 2,465 sq. ft. (+161 sq.ft.) Setbacks: Front: 20 ft. 15.5 ft. 15.5 ft. Sides: 15'ft,I1 5 ft: 17 ft./l 8 ft. No Change Rear: 15 ft, >50 ft. >50 ft. Site Coverage: 6,055 sq. ft.(20%) 1,493 sq. ft. (4.9%) 1,535 sq. ft. (5.1 %) Landscaping: 60% >60% >60% Parking: 2.5 spaces required 4 spaces provided No Change (d/w not paved) Setback variance requested does not exceed variance approved by P in June, 1978. Driveway must be paved before TCO is issued for addition. Upon review of the Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested variance based the following factors: I The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential us and structures in the vicinity. I The proposed addition encroaches into the front setback less than the existing garage. The second story addition will have little to no effect on the surrounding uses or structures. All adjacent property owners have been notified and no objections have been received by staff. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and M O enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibilli and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. E I I Z ♦ I Inat were approved, meam: Trial any Tufure aaaMons woult MOSI IlKeiy 77 711 e7mey over the existing house or in the front setback. Thus, staff feels that the poon of the existing house and the steep slopes behind, combined with the narrowness of the lot at the end of the cul-de-sac, create a hardship for the applicant that does not exist with other lots in the vicinity. The internal layout of the house determines the most optimal location for a small addition, such as is proposed. The location of the existing structure and the internal configuration of the house dictate the proposed location for the addition. Staff feels the size of the addition is reasonable, as is the size of the of the overal,I house which could be significantly larger due to the large lot size and available GRFA. Staff also feels that granting this variance would not be a grant of special privilege. n 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. i IH a m k- � Of 1 1`m P ITo ia b oelyor4o 0S 'Plnv MEMORANDUM to f TO Planning and Environmental Commission FROM Community Development Department I= SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor bar and dining deck operation (the "Corral") at Garton' s Saloon, Crossroads Center, located at 143 E. Meadow Drive/Lot 1, Block 5D, Vail Village First Filing Applicants: Garton's Saloon/Dave Garton Planner: Randy Stouder VO Maintenance of access to the ADA lift through the deck area Loading activities for Garton's must occur at approved Crossroads loading areas only; 9 A curfew of 10:00 PM on all activities on the outdoor dining deck; The requirement that a sound test be conducted prior to the opening of the deck and the sound test will include the use of decibel meters to set a maximum volume level for the amplified sound; MINIMUM 1111111,11 By "I W% Mp Aesthetic improvements to the deck area were required and additional landscaping was required where past loading activities had denuded . . en space separating the deck area from the South Frontage Road; 0 No outdoor storage of materials would be allowed; Staff discussed the issue to extend the conditional use permit to a multi-year approval or to an indefinite approval. It is staff's conclusion that the approval should be «:7212¥ on a year-by-year basis, since the noise problem was not completely eliminated last year. Staff feels that last years on-site management team did a good job in controlling crowds and noise. However, staff recognizes the fact that the »» ©* management at Garton's Saloon has changed from last year. Thus, we feel that the annual conditional use review is appropriate to iron out the previous year's problems. \ � 3 FROM: Community Development Department ATE: May 9, 1994 WORKSESSION ISSUES A. Operational Issues Issue #1, Will the hours of operation 4000 to 9:00 p.m. adequately control the crowd and will the patrons actually move off of the parking deck at 9:00 p.m.? PEC Resoonse: 11111 1 El B. IRWIM Mr. Garton expressed a desire to extend the use 'Permit to a five year term, Staff and the PEC believe the term of the conditional use permit should be :estricted to one season at a time. General Appearance of Ranchyard Issue #6 Should the exterior appearance of the ranchyard be improved? 40 3 PEC Resoonse: Issue #8: El PEC Rg§2Anse. Mr. Garton has agreed to abide by the Sign Code. 0 4 z Conditional The proposed operation is allowed as a conditional use per the aforementioned sections 18.28.040(1)� and 18.28.030(E) of the Municipal Zoning Code V. RELATED POLICIES OF THE VAIL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A. Land Use Plan B. Vail Village Master Plan The Vail Village Master Plan does encourage the development of a variety of new commercial activity where compatible with existing land uses, and specifies the following policy to achieve this objective: "2A.2 folic Activity that provides night life and evening entertainment for both the guest and the community shall be encouraged." In addition, a wide variety of activities, events, and street life along pedestrian ways and plazas are encouraged, and states as a policy that: "3.3.2 folic Outdoor dining is an important streetscape feature and shall be Ell I tt It' ffimmulm"Ditimm- WO-Umm "EltzmaINSUT tul M ul B. o r E VII. STAFF REC#MMENDATION 1 . Handicapped access to Garton's Saloon shall be maintained per the American H M 0 9 banners, signs or flyers of any type shall be erected outdoors to advertise • DESCRIP'TION OF THE NATURE'..O,F THE PROPOSED US--]. This letter is to summarize our desire to once-again have our dinner/cocktail operation during the off-season (June 1 - November on our upper parking lot deck here at Garton's Saloon. We d® feel this benefits the T.O.V. because it keeps the ta-x dollars in Tmm rather than elsewhere doNN valley if these groups went dmNn there for cook- outs and barbecues. P.O. Box 1057 --e 143 E. Meadow Drive e VcIl. Colorado 31 658 ---- (303) 479-0607 t,- FAX (303) 476-7455 " i® Lk t � ,;;' I m EX ^4 Cr f I Applicant: Chris Hansen, representing the Westin Resort Planner: George Rather Dave Garton said that large crowds were only a problem on Fridays and that he felt that the 10:00 p.m. rule should only apply on Fridays. He said he would like to see people allowed to remain on the deck past 10:00 p.m,- Saturday through Thursday nights, but that the music would be off at 10:00 p.m. every night. Bill Anderson said that the police reports were ambiguous about the actual circumstances surrounding each complaint. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes May 9, 1994 93 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM Community Development Department DATE: July 25, 1994 SUBJECT: A request to modify the conditional use permit t ' o extend the hours of operation at Garton's outdoor dining deck (Crossroads Center), located at 143 East Meadow Drive/Lot 1, Block 5D, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant Dave Garton Planner Randy Stouder IL BACKGROUND Before acting on a conditional use application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. 11 11 3. The effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestzR- automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from street and parking areas. This criteria is not applicable to the current proposal. - 4. Effect upon character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to the surrounding uses. Staff feels that the ranchyard is a positive entertainment option for visitors and locals during the summer. We also feel that the use would be consistent with the character of the surrounding area, which has retail, restaurant, office and residential uses, if the music and crowd noise can be controlled so that adjacent property owners are not adversely effected. 9 Z -ILE COPT Bill Anderson, Bob Armour, Greg Amsden, Jeff Bowen and Dalton Williams had no comments concerning the Outdoor Recreation District. Jim Lamont felt that the name Public Service District was clearer than the name General Use District® He stated that he would like to see the term "quasi-public" more clearly defined. - :'Dalton Williams suggested that the P ask the staff to take a look at the Ski Base Recreation zone district in order to clarify some of the issues (i.e. parking and loading) they have discussed in conjunction with the current rezoning request. 11 C A request to amend a previously approved conditional use to allow for restaurant — service to extend past 10:00 p.m. on the dining deck located at Garto.n's Saloon, 143 East Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant Dave Garton I Planner: Randy Stoud4j Planning and Environmental Commission 40 July 25, 1994 3 � ,� �, Planning and Environmental Commission July 25, 1994 U I! I L I I I W.,J I L 1 1 1 1 - - UCR slatuie/oTdinance Nurr'- Incident I 5'- e sen Dale/TIM8 )Ort- M — T i m e Day DalefTimelDay of Occurence n4 9`/ /1 GEO Code rence 6 r To rVp - 10DOnn; pirne w. wlin Ucense Numb-er/SlatO a 9: Last, First, Mlddle (LcCJ�' r /<�bGc'-)6 Number Date of Birth Age Aace Sex HgL WL Hair Eyes Social security - 7 'la = Ld i -v' Descripkn (Of the person) Zip Code Phone ddress: Residence r 9 0� Zip Code Phone Address: Visidng/Mailing Z 1p Code Phone 1 0 ddress: susinessloc--upation ('Xr" I , ) -A Ucense Number/SLaIS T Name: LasL First, Middle HgL WL Hair Eyes Build Social SecUfRY Number Dais ol Birth Age Race Sex 0 onescription (of the ppefs0n) Zip Code Phone Address: Residence Zip Gode Phone f i Address: Visit.ing/Mailing 1 41P Code Phone COD ddress: Business/occupaUon 4 sound (musician, amplifier, elc,) ter used: YES Q NO Ej It NO, why not? Reading #2/T1n19 -7a METER Reading #1Mrn " ' " — 1":O�2 `5� 4X25 - Eallbratfon bate(s) Used according to i INGS igs at 5 092bel lvieter Br!and Name :M be Serial Number r o NO iiervals) - 7 - .s r / - � 'I� 19 —iTi-n r,! irtion warning supervisor SUBJECT A conditional use permit to allow for outdoor dining at the West Vail Mail, located at 2151 North Frontage Road/Lot 2, Vail Das Schone Third Filing Applicants Tom Gart for West Vail Mail Corporation Planner. Randy Stouder 1141-17 1 U3 n HE 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the developmenI5 objectives of the Town. property. Existing parking should be adequate since the heaviest use of the tables will be during the warmer months of the year when parking is generally not a problem at the mail. Under the Town Code, parking is not required for outdoor dining areas. The tables are proposed to be left outside year-round since even during the winter there are days when it is warm enough to eat outdoors. The 4. Effect upon the character ot the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk ot the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. a crew, with the assistance of the individual tenants. Staff is still concerned 40 with this issue and has proposed a condition to address this concern. before arantina a conditional use r)ermit: 1 That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning co and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. I 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. Staff feels that this request meets the criteria and findings for a conditional use permit as noted in the previous section of this memorandum, and therefore recommends approval of the proposal. Staff recommends the following conditions be applied to the approval of the conditional use permit: One additional table shall be added at the Taco Bell store front (see site plan note). 4 C E-1 U3 F:\users \chris \randy \permit ; i r . ' -Ids k0 w �� r 'r. *'` _ .pL �• © ' � 1 � ZS � ; , r � 7 _Y i IL �-- - CPA tlP pvc r•,, is-efi 4L r 25 4 I _t S ite Ot���d" rvus i�x i s �D% Ld� s I . t s ��. �+ • 3 ' - ''' S I �� I b — • W1711 3 r,� ��A�,� ens, e Y, oo Va Ott � ()O r 1'0 � P �� ! � � ! � M MEMORANDUM TO Planning and Environmental Commission SUBJECT: A request for a worksession for an amendment to the Ford Park Master Plan to allow for an expansion to the Betty Ford Alpine Garden located at 183 Gore Creek Drive/an unplatted parcel of land located in the northeast 1 /4of Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth principle meridian, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado. Applicants Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, Represented by Sammye Meadows and Helen Fritch, Planner: George Rother The Vail Alpine Garden Foundation expects to have the funds raised for the construction of the visitors center and exhibits by the late spring of 1995. At the present time, the project is projected to be open for public use by the summer of 1997. The amendment process to the Ford Park Master Plan requires hearings before the Vail Town 9 It was a desire of the steering committee that the Vail Nature Center remain undisturbed." In the creation of the Ford Park Master Plan, the project consultant recommended that the felling information be submitted to the Town of Vail, prier to final design consideration of any improvements to the alpine gardens: 40 2 1 . A location/layout/site plan; 2. A survey and grading plan, 3. A landscape and planting plan; 4. An irrigation plan; and 5. A construction phasing plan. According to the Town of Vail Zoning map, Ford Park is currently zoned General Use (GU). As stated in the Zoning Code, the purpose of the General Use zone district is as follows: 0 3 d. Density control, e. Site coverage f. Landscaping and site development; and 9- Parking and loading. E n IMMMPM�._� 4. Cc QmituitL Common materials theme with interrelated forms and color. Z Lr Reasonable, but realistic in cost with ease of accomplishment, in consideration of long-term maintenance expenditures. URMI 5 U3 R located immediately adjacent to a large recreation field and the playground. PrODOsed Master Plan Text Amendment. Lim 7. N �� The Community Development Department routed the proposed plans to both the Town of Vail Public Works Department and the Town of Vail Fire Department. Each department has returned their written comments. The written comments have been attached for your review. 0 7 SOP - GALL COMPLEX 4 SWt MING POOL CO,XPLEX' Pe x;vated ca,cessror:s Ana a •x�,s :r^� Gt, ...,�. , 5 aza t N'Ea raraceG S®a:i ^.g E.^..pro P k g 7 Ca ,.. .f�..w.±P� >.�"� g �o,rM - � Pas solar ore a , t f �`llA t nAC.^.?35 — --s - - - M Bika Pate [o East Vad L ,. • a [L - a�?r 5 �.! ''°- �d r :— "�"__.._.'...,_"" -4.• .. ^ .rr °� � .�... -- ._ �.s�."G� f �...�a� 7 - ` - ®oca.� so .ca 7b PhPKiNG _ _ m �•e a.. « 3$sa ,�.E -1;� -+� : °rs.,S;:. 1 °-°°` ,.. � ,•,� .�r��a1 � Pr � aw 1 %1°' r:>�`� �� �;+- � _ ^� � .� � �� .\ e • � r y-• „� s �` {" 1 sus..^ `'� �� °° -� ' , L'..2 -� s .?' \ _- - mss,. - = = .__ i'� , a� Ei£ i` �.r,a, �„' z �• , • a. c °= *: °,_ ' I'd pay Areas F aye a G.ts arkso-uauresia�re � �..:��� �4 �\ \ .•`. .�� ,' °,�w,� /ar - � ,/ ,> < �.�..,•� �_�'"""�V v:��� -- °`*°°" '°e,,. - � ,�' ��° °r° - 6. INPORMAL AL?'PJE�Yr j .��'- - _ PLAY FIE '. ld�GAR �, -•'• sr� _ V P ICNI C AREA PiCrt PSh N TJ � ARE J ye y 1 PiGf G a GnI1S *� � � ® \ t f ?��� . t �v" �Rfg ✓ � / � �ih $a �� � °� E 'sting Str,ctures >l ED PP_�Fa � p SKATING oOtiDS�— 3r w' a, t',A'• t r r �' . GcServatron Ck °R�.• ! �A" 'Y ?' 'dj a,5 Wasr Paa:we =cr Aarat,On y .. 'y-o+, 'iay f Sri g y> • T .,'.� MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT sr.cge Pies ac e s• q°'� a cr` y / 5 50 00 300 t Town of V iip oLc of w.,.n ty MASTER PLAN d U.-I K associates. iod. ere.• •. t� . \ /� � \�~ ~ /� 2 / � �� / � \ . . & ., . �� � © 2 � \�\ � \\ �� / . , ^6 . � / � �� .. .vz . . \ � \ \` \ < ; \ \ / �\ \� . � � � � / `� /\ «� . { THE FET BLE DESIGN OF THE VISITOR CENTER WILL ACCOMMODATE A SECLUDED GARDEN COOR'1'YARD AS WELL AS SPACES FOR EDUCATIONAL MISPLAYS, GROVP MEE'PINGS, VISITOR OR 1EN'i'A'PION, Anil A GARDEN Li DIV,R, r i �t CO , , I. COURTYARD 2. EXHIBIT GALLERY 3. MEETING BALL ) fly 4. INFORMATION 5 LIBRARY , 6. WORKSPACE 1 �� 7. KITCHEN B . A/V THEATER �t CO , , ul F 7 ill I 42 West Afeadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 303 - 4 79 - MEMORANDUM TO: GEORGE RUTHER FROM: MICHAEL MCGEE, FIRE MARSHAL DATE: APRIL 18, 1995 RE: FORD PARK EDUCATION CENTER Mail Fire Department We received a set of proposed plans for the above projec Upon review, we have identified the following issues: I 1. The location of the proposed structure is not within f ire department vehicular access. In order to provide vehicular access for fire apparatus, the "bike path" on the south side of the play ground would need to be rebuilt to meet minimum access requirements (width, load capacity, turning radius, etc.). The other option is to have a fire sprinkler system installed within the structure. An exterior hose station may also be required due to the lack of access. 2� :.x. regarding s ., <y-il . Vail . . h ave s ..,. :� � the c: w.... < d <» » : « ° «� Garden Masterplan for Ford Park. I f support the concept of t Eduoational Center and feel it will be of great benefit to t, Garden and m . t :z:». 2 handicap °°«f222222 k kl«« » «.a :... s.. ...c arking areas through the VIRD Tennis upper entrance to he 2 ¥??««2«?« & v to be coordinated with wf° and also looking orw r working with them on the Ford Park MEMORANDUM MUMME19 "I Community Development Department SUBJECT A request for a worksession for a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor dining area for the Daily Grind Coffee Company, located at 288 Bridge Street/Lot B, Block 5- , Vail Village I st Filing. Applicant: Bany Florescue (property owner) and Kaye Ferry Planner: George Rather The applicant, Kaye Ferry, is requesting a worksession with the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) to discuss a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor dining deck at the Daily Grind Coffee Company. The outdoor dining. a is proposed to be in the existing plaza immediately to the west of the Daily Grind Coffee Company, adjacent to Bridge Street. (See PEC memo dated April 10, 1995, attached.) El ,� - � � �s 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REDME5T The review criteria for a request of this nature ° ®© ?hed by the Town of Vail Municipal Code. In addition to the conditional use criteria staff has included criteria from the zoning code, the Vail Comprehensive Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations as we believe this will help the PEC 22<!»« »d< the request. The Daily Grind Coffee Company is located in the Commercial Core I (CCI) zone district. According to Section 18.24.010 of the zoning code, the purpose of the CCI district is: 0 "to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The commercial core I district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open sn- ace an of-taldigcc • uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrian ways and public green ways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the village." An outdoor dining patio on the "first floor" or "street level" shall be permitted in the CCI zone district . subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with provisions of Chapter 18.60. For the PC's reference, the conditional use permit purpose statement indicates that Several elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan indirectly address outdoor dining areas. The relevant elements and sections are listed below. A. Land Use Plan EN commercial activities that are compatible with existing land uses. I Elv D 3.3.2 Policy: Outdoor dining is an important streetscape feature and shall be encouraged in commercial in -fill or redevelopment projects." I Am Consideration of Factors: I* 1 a Relationshin and € coact of the uqa ern the dpvpinnmpnt nhipe-tivpQ f 4. Effect upon the character *Toll© the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Staff is also concerned with the lack of adequate trash removal in the area. According to the applicant, the tables will not be serviced by wait staff. Therefore, patrons of the Daily Grind will be left with the responsibility of maintaining the outdoor dining area and keeping it free of trash and debris. Staff recommenday: s request is denial. There asons for the denial of this request are based on the possible negative effect the proposal will have on the adjacent retail shop to the north of w-« Grind Coffee Company as well as the use of plastic tables and chairs. Staff finds that «x2>» icant's request does not comply with Criteria A. 1 & 4 and that Finding B. 2 has not been met. Staff does believe, however, that the overall concept of an outdoor dining W 0 KI s f® fi � a� • r77M LLA El LA • 3. A request for a conditional use to allow for an outdoor dining deck for the Daily Grind ,located at 288 Bridge St B, Block 5H, Vail Village Ist Filing. Applicant The Daily Grind Coffee House Planner: George Ruther Greg Amsden asked if the Daily Grind has a lease for the space in front of the Sungiass Hut. Kaye Ferry stated that the lease includes the area from the Rucksack to the front of Max Alexander's store® Punning and Environmemal Commission April 10, 1995 Minutes 4�' Greg Arnsden asked Holly McCutcheon what the State of Colorado would require to get a liquor license. Kaye Ferry said there would be no one monitoring the consumption of alcohol on the premises on the outdoor dining area but +',arp would 111— be someone inside the Daily Grind. She stated that there is no consistency from one restaurant to another and stated that other restaurants in Town did not have anyone monitoring the consumption of alcohol on the outdoor dining decks. Mike Miollica asked the applicant if this proposal had been discussed and communicated to the adjacent shop owners. The major change of placing a barricade and blocking some of the access to the adjacent shops and visibility to the shops could be a major concern to adjacent shop owners. Kaye Ferry stated that four more planters will,be added for separation from pedestrian way and very few people walk through this area now. Mike Mollica again asked if the applicant had asked adjacent shop owners about the proposed request. 11 11l 111 J Jill Greg Amsden stated he had two major issues; the first was in regard to the alcohol consumption control in the outdoor dining patio and the delineation and separation from the seating area/serving area from pedestrians going into the adjacent shops. The second issue is the materials of the tables and chairs. Kaye Ferry stated she felt that was not possible given the lease that she has with the landlord and the space leased to her. Kevin Delghan also stated that another concern is that there will be no place for skis, bikes, etc. to be placed where they are now once the Daily Grind blocks off this area. Planning sund Environmenl� Commission April 10, 9995 Greg Moffet stated his main concern is making sure the Sunglass Hut has access to the pedestrian area. Kaye again stated that the owner, Barry Florescue, is going to take care of this issue. he doesn't like the plastic material of the tables and chairs. fe Henry Pratt stated that he felt that a more formal fence or separation is required. He also has the same concerns regarding notification of adjacent shop owners, material of the tables and chairs, etc. Greg Amsden stated he is in favor of an outdoor dining area. The applicant needs to definitely show more delineation of separation and/or fencing. The applicant needs to close in the outdoor dining area so that customers stay on property while consuming alcohol purchased from the Daily Grind since this request is for more of a private use and not public anymore. Greg Amsden stated that the Design Review Board (DRB) will want more than just plastic tables and chairs. He also reiterated that people need to have direct access to Sunglass Hut and the other retail shop. The applicant needs to make sure the other retail shops are not blocked. The P more factual information and the applicant needs to refine the plans showing a more 4-e -d delineation of space. Planning and Environmemal Commission A;Yif 10, 1995 Minutes Jeff Bowen asked if all the adjacent property owners are notified. Mike Mollica stated that the adjacent property owners are contacted but not necessarily the retail shop owners. Mike stated that this request needs to be taken a step further and felt that the adjacent retail shop owners should be notified. Kevin Deighan asked if Tom Moorhead could clarify of how adjacent property owners and retail shop owners are notified. How does it work? Henry Pratt stated that he would also like to see how the liquor board feels about access to adjacent shops through the outdoor dining area. He also asked if the Fire Department would Planning and Environmental Commission April 10, 1995 ,�, Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this request for two weeks or an additional period of time if the PEC agenda is substantial and that it would be an undue burden. Bob Armour seconded t motion. The vote was 5-0 with Henry Pratt abstaining due to a conflict of interest. I .4. A request for a worksession for a major SDD amendment to allow for an expansion to the Glen Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road/Area 74 Specia Development District #4, Cascade Village. Applicant® Glen Lyon Partnership represented by Gordon Pierce and Ken O'Bryan Planner: Randy Stouder Greg Amsden stated that the applicant requested to have this item tabled until April 24, 1995.. A request for minor subdivision to amend the location of the platted building envelopes located at 1374 and 1378 Sandstone Drive/Lots D & E, Briarpatch. Applicant: Jim Guida Construction for Briar Patch LLC Planner® Jim Curnutte Jeff Bowen made motion to approve the changes per the memo with the condition listed in the 0 Planning and Environmental Commission, Ap6l 10, 1995 Minutes 0 TO: Planning and Environmental Commission Applicant: Barry Florescue (property owner) and Kaye Ferry Planner: George Ruther E3 At the April 10th PEC meeting, several outstanding issues were discussed. The PEC asked that the applicant and staff research the outstanding issues and be prepared to respond to the questions at the next meeting. The questions the PEC sought answers to are as follows: I The owner of the building has entered into a license agreement with the applicantfor use of the plaza area A portion of the plaza area is currently used as an access corridor to the Sunglass Hut Can the applicant operate an outdoor dining deck in the plaza area andpotentially block access to the Sunglass Hut? • 2 El Will the state and local liquor licensing authorities allow pedestrian access through the licensed area? OMME z. ......... ........ ........ 11111111 ........ ........ ...... !III!! ...... ...... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . F:\everyone\pec\inemos\dOygrd.508