Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-0626 PECO � 0 F:\everyone\pec\noiices.062695 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION June 26, 1995 AGENDA Site Visits 10:30 p.m. West Vail Mail 1390 Greenhill Court Cascade Crossing Medical Center, Catheter Lab Daily Grind Applicant: Andrew Woods, DBA Local's Liquor Planner: Mike Mollica 2. A request for a setback variance to allow for an addition to a residence, located at 1390 Greenhill Court/Lot 12, Glen Lyon. Applicant: Summit Vacation Properties Planner: Andy Knudtsen 3. A request for a worksession for a conditional use permit to allow the Vail Valley Medical Center to park a mobile catheter lab/trailer at the Meadow Drive loading area, located at 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E & F, Vail Village 2nd Filing. MEMBERS PRESENT Bob Armour Henry Pratt JeffBowen Greg Moffett Greg Amsden STAFF PRESENT: The meeting was called to order at 2:05p.m. by Bob Armour. 1. A request for a worksession for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the Vail Valley Medical Center to park a mobile catheter lab/trailer at the Meadow Drive loading are- located at 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E & F, Vail Village 2nd Filing. I Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Dan Feeney Planner- Randy Stouder Bob Armour asked if the applicant was ready with his presentation. Ray McMahan stated that the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) approached the Hospitals board of directors after careful consideration of the mobile service. The medical staff felt that the procedure was safe and would provide a benefit to the community. F:\everyone\pec\ninute,91062695 Ray McMahan stated there were 5 reasons to approve this request: 1. This lab would deliver additional health care to our community. As it is now, a patient must drive to Denver or Grand Junction to have this procedure done. 4. The service can be provided to the Community even at a low level of demand for use, since the overall cost is shared between many communities. 5. The VVMC has had two meetings with the Community and believes that the Community's concerns can be resolved. Ray McMahan, director of Vail Valley Medical Center introduced cardiologist Cr. Gaul and Stephanie Arbanowit. The Catheterization process is a diagnostic test to determine if there is blockage of the arteries of the heart. A tube that injects dye is inserted into an artery in the groin to view any blockage. X- rays are taken to give the Doctor a visual image of the blood flow patterns for the heart. This is an outpatient procedure that takes about 1 hour. The recovery period is from 4-8 hours long, and patients will be brought into the hospital during recovery. Kevin Deighan inquired if patients have chest pains, do they want to wait for the lab to show up or is immediate care required? 1 Z Dr. Gaul said it would only be doctor's offices. Dr® Gaut said that the recovery period requires that monitoring be done by expert nurses. The- Edwards facility is not anticipated to be the type of facility that would have the necessary personnel for routine monitoring. Bob Arrnour asked if moving the catheter lab to within the hospital made sense, since movi personnel down valley to the Edwards site opened up room in the existing hospital. I Dr. GaLd said on a non economic basis, it takes 250 procedures per year to break even with an in house catheter lab. The Vail hospital will not come close to those numbers. Ray McMahon stated that heart disease is the leading cause of death in the US. 75% of admissions in the VVMC are heart related, not knee injuries. Bob Armour said the appropriateness of the. trailer is the issue, not whether or not the procedure is nee cted. Kevin Deighan stated that it was the hospital's job to determine if this was needed® if the medical staff says we need this, let's try to accommodate them, but with minimal impact to the neighborhood. Greg Mbffet was in favor of the level of medical care increasing. A new site behind the hospital would t3e more appropriate. The lab should also not be present on the busiest weekends. Bob our invited the public to come up front to look at the map during a discussion of potential alternati-ve locations. JML Dan Feeney said that utility hookup requirements would not be a problem in either of the two 4 A P alternative locations being discussed, since the existing utilities could conceivably work. fil Pam Stenmark, from the Evergreen Lodge, stated that only a 40'tree would make a difference. Pam also said that the hospital parking structure is jammed in the winter and a loss of parking spaces should not be considered. Henry Pratt would not like to see any loss of parking spaces currently dedicated to the publilT Perhaps, for 2 or 3 days a month staff parking could be juggled. ISM 1141111 4M.- Ray McMahan said the dumpster was necessary for construction projects that were on-going. 11 11111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIJIggl; IIIIIIII III I 11g, 1111 1111�Ii � ii Dan Feeney, from the VVMC, said the Uniform Fire Code doesn't require sprinklers and that the fire lane could be narrowed down from the existing 208, only if sprinklers were installed in the parking garage. F:\every one p=1a nutes',1562695 Robby Robinson stated that he was a heart patient. He has lived in the valley since 1966 whe health care was the ski patrol. The catheter lab as a mobile unit can save money, so why ma the hospital turn it into a permanent structure? He was strongly in support of the project. I Pam Stenmark, manager of Evergreen Lodge, invited the Commission and Staff to view the hospital from the Evergreen Hotel's corridors and rooms. Bob Armour said a site visit to the Evergreen would occur as part of the next meeting on the project. Pam Stenmark said that the parking requirements for the hospital should be consistent with other commercial projects. She toured the catheter lab. Looking up the alley one sees the entrance to the parking structure, a clumpster and a weeded hillside. The view from Meadow Drive up the alley is not attractive now and won't be further harmed by the proposed mobile lab. She supported the proposed location, and did not like the alternative sites discussed by the PEC. Joan Norris, a resident of the Skaal Haus, wants the service, but at an alternate location. M Jim Lamont said the landscaping on the Skaal house side of the alley is non-existent, because the residents allow snow removal to be stored there. If they weren't nice enough to allow snow to be stored there, it would be landscaped. F:kveryonelpn\rninuies\062695 !III I III I I I III MEMO RIVER III 3. A request for a setback variance to allow for an addition to a residence, located at 1390 Greenhill Court/Lot 12, Glen Lyon. Applicant: Summit Vacation Properties Planner, Andy Knudtsen Henry Pratt abstained from this item, as a member of his office has been retained to represent an adjacent property owner. Andy Knudtsen gave a presentation. The applicant wanted to enclose an existing patio and convert it to a greenhouse, using 163 sq. foot. John Railton, the architect for the applicant, spoke on behalf of his client. The applicants are from Florida and use the residence during the winter and want more sun. The suggested solutior. was a glass enclosure to minimumly change the design. John stated that this was an . underdeveloped site and the Applicant's agreed not to develop it further. He said that it was a hardship which justified the variance. Ned Gwathmey represented the owner of the lot. He did not feel a precedent for extending into the side setback should be set and recommended denial. Jeff Bowen said there was not a hardship on the site and was not in favor of granting the request. PI L"'A 11 111A Greg IlMoffet didn't have a tremendous problem with granting the request, but was concerned about 1he precedent. There was no hardship as far as he was concerned. John Railton said the Applicant lived here during the winter and couldn't use the deck. They were reluctant to use canvas enclosures, instead opting for it to be done well. Snow failing on the deck presents the hardship. A glass enclosure would also conserve energy. Greg Amsden said it was a dangerous precedent having a variance subject to tradeoffs and was not interested in deed restricting the lot and limiting future GRFA potential. A variance is not needed, since there is a good expanse of lot to the rear. John Railton responded, as an architect, that the impact to future homes was more desirable with the proposed site addition, rather than building on the back. It seems to him that this is a minor setback and +they are only trying to make the deck more useable during the winter months when they are here. The request was unanimously denied by a vote of 5-0-1. Henry Pratt abstained. 4® A request for a conditional use permit to allow for exterior seating at the West Vail Mall, located at 2151 North Frontage Road/Lot 4A, Vail as Schore 3rd Filing. Applicant: West Vail Mall Corporation Ptanner: Randy Stouder 1 R; N 430 11,111111 11 1 101113017, Onrliilir II Pill 111 1111111 111 1111 111 1 i!! i III 11111�1111 !I!I11;1j;jjI L jA1.1MM;:1I !111111 , 11 111! A Henry Pratt had no problem with the request, but would like to share one comment. He feels the traffic flow at Taco Bell may aggravate the parking problem. Jeff Bowen thinks the proposal offers a great improvement, but feels the trash problem is critical. This motion was unanimous, approved by a vote of 6-0. A " f W 5. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor dining deck at the Daily Grind Coffee Company, located at 288 Bridge Street/Lot B, Block 5H, Vail Village 1st so Filing. Applicant: The Daily Grind Coffee Company Planner: George Ruther ZI Mike MoRlica stated that if the property is going to be restricted to patrons of the Daily Grind, then a Conditional Use Permit must be granted. F7 Kaye Fer-,Yy said that this was her property and The Daily Grind was very generous in allowing "brown baggers," but not to assume its use was for "brown baggers." FAevcry®ae \ada \D62645 0 V U3 L KJAZU FROM: Community Development Department DATE- June 26, 1995 SUBJECT: A request for a worksession concerning a request for a conditional use permit to allow the Vail Valley Medical Center to park a mobile catheter lab in the fire lane adjacent to the hospital's loading area, adjacent to West Meadow Drive, located at 811 Meadow Drive/Lots E and F, Block 1, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Ray McMahan and Dan Feeney Planner- Randy St0 e . / \� \�° �� \ . \ � »� \ »< \ .. �! I The proposed location, the dimensions, and the required changes to the configuration of the fire lane are shown on the attached plan sheets. A concrete pad must be poured to level and support the mobile l proposed location will require the removal of some sodded area. one svruce tree and the i i wA4#*,xW&'w 1 enclosure. M W7771 IL 11'i'�IIIAI 2 1""WENJUx a Why does the hospital not purchase the necessary equipment to perform t catheterization process inside existing hospital operating rooms? M -�� =�= i 40 3 The mobile lab would be parked at the hospital for a maximum of three days per month. The hospital feels that the lab can be brought to the site, operated and removed in a quiet, timely fashion that will not adversely effect the adjacent residential communities. The medical center has held at least two neighborhood qW meetings and invited the surrounding neighborhood to the demonstration that took place on June 19th. Issues raised by the community to date concern visual impacts, noise and the potential for more intense use of the lab pad site. There is also a concern that the lab will hinder access to the Skaal Hus' parking spaces and trash dumpster that are accessible only from the VVMC fire lane (easement agreement in force). 4 717" III 5. U, Timing of arrival and departure of the lab is also critical due to conflicts with heavy traffic and pedestrian rush hours associated with ski day activities in the winter. Staff feels that the lab should arrive and leave at off-peak periods so conflicts do not e. aJO-Ra5ponse. Staff agrees with the medical center's analysis and also agrees that there is one excess parking space available that could be used when the mobile lab is actually providing services on the property. Can the width of the fire lane be reduced on a temporary basis without sacrificing safety? Medical Staff ResDonse: i 9 structure. According to the applicant, the existing fire lane width of 20 feet would be narrowed to approximately 11 feet when the lab is in place. This would still allow for a fire truck to get around the lab in case of an emergency. Section 10.203, Exception the 1991 Uniform Fire Code allows the Fire Marshall to agree to narrowing of a standard fire lane width if the building to be accessed (the ,r ;arking structure) is protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system. Hence, the medical center has agreed to equip all covered levels of the parking structure with an automatic fire sprinkler system. Also, the lab will remain attached to the cab or tractor that pulls it at all times. It would take approximately 15 to 20 minutes to prepare the trailer to move in an emergency. 1111 11111 111111111�11 1�1111 111111111111 11111111 111�1111��1111 '' 11111111 !!1 11111111111 1111111111111111111111111 1 11 > N 11 1 mom A flat, concrete pad capable of supporting the heavy weight of the mobile catheter lab will have to be constructed adjacent to the medical center building and trash compactor structure along the western portion of the existing fire lane. The concrete pad and the fire lane will be reconfigured so that the pad will be flush with the asphalt of the fire lane and will not protrude above grade. The medical center will also need to install electric, phone and fire alarm connections on the southeast corner of the existing medical center building so that the mobile lab can be hooked up to these services. The connections can be accommodated within a 3 foot, by 3 foot, by 1 foot deep enclosure that would be designed on the existing brick wall of the building. -M-ULTMTS-1U7Fi=u-i1Hry sevrei at --. e Wta Onewl, ie-rna"� Orectlyuendain the trailer and will not be visible to the surrounding public areas due to skirting and metal structures along the sides of the trailer. The connections, once detached, will not be apparent due to the fact that all connections will be made below grade through the proposed manhole. M, Mgdir.�ff �r �n. The VVIVIC would like to bring the mobile lab to the hospital for a maximum of three days. The staff that operates the mobile lab normally brings the lab into a hospital facility the evening before the services are to be provided to the patients and departs sometime in the early afternoon hours after performing the scheduled catheterization processes. Staff feels that a maximum of three days per month is appropriate. Staff feels that the lab arrival and departure should occur at off-peak times, thus avoiding potential conflicts that would most likely occur if the lab were to be brought in and removed on the same day. With the lab set up the night before, the procedures could begin much earlier in the morning and be completed early in the afternoon so the lab could pull out before the afternoon skier rush. Staff feels that this arrangement would work best rather than trying to bring the trailer in and out on the same day. In order to bring the trailer in the same day, the mobile lab would have to be 7 r E 1 ul P I,- EM ,�3 1 97.28 • c h EAST ELEVATION. SCALE : 1/8 19 -0" EPDXY -- COATED REDAR 5 AT.12 "E,W.,HOOK TIOP BARS, TOP & BOT SPHAET PAVN )ICAL -ICE LDING 0 EX'VRI i E I E oVe""d; z.41 vailvalley medical center June 20, 1995 Mr. Randy Stouder Community Development Department Town Of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: Mobile Catheterization Lab Dear Randy: Following are the hospital's responses to certain issues and concerns which have been raised by members of the Town staff, as well as the community, with regard to our application for a conditional use permit for the mobile catheterization lab® 13 0 Ray McMahan Chief Executive Cfficer 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-2451 JUN 2 6 1995 PT "d L- I Following are the hospital's responses to certain issues and concerns which have been raised by members of the Town staff, as well as the community, with regard to our application for a conditional use permit for the mobile catheterization lab® 13 0 Ray McMahan Chief Executive Cfficer r Use n r r ® The generator which is housed in the lab will not be run at any time. Instead, the lab will be fully powered with hospital electricity, which will not cause any noise® a DFokr Enclosures (2) I June 8, 1995 Vail Town Council 75 South Frontage Vail, Colorado 81657 Although we understand the importance of diagnostic equipment for area residents ` we question if this is the appropriate location of this facility. A major docking port of this magnitude hardly is in keeping with the residential environment of this area. A permanent docking port for a 601 long 151 high semi-truck trailer has commercial/industrial elements incompatible with residential environment. This is not the appropriate locatio for the catherization lab and/or any other truck-trailer usag] We urge you to consider the negative effect upon the character of the area and impact on property values, as you proceed with your review of this conditional use permit application. Please advise the scheduled date for public hearing on this issue. We also are interested in attending any neighborhood meeting prior to the Town Council's public hearing, and would appreciate being advised of the same, so we can make plans to be present. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and concerns and your response to this letter. 5420 Renaissance Avenue San Diego, CA 92122 (619) 756-3795 Fax (619) 756-9591 cc: Ken Barber, Rawhide Company East Village Homeowners Association 11 It has been brought to the attention of the Homeowners Association, that a conditional use permit has been requested for a mobile laboratory port to accommodate a 60 x 15 foot diesel tractor truck and trailer on the east side of the Vail Valley Medical Center. As a concept, the Homeowners Association does not question the need for a mobile labo- ratory or However, in practice, the functional and practical difficulties created by this particu- lar proposal are an indication that at present, a permanently enclosed truck dock and port should be installed elsewhere on the medical center site. EVHA/PEC 623/95 page 2 The doctor responsible for ««» 2 mobile catherization lab proposal has said that the mo- bile < »s <«« » »« «< in Vail will not be used for patients in life threatening circumstances. It is of concern to the Association, that because there is a risk of «:« .aeni mplications from the "catherization" diagnostic procedure, that a patient's condition could be aggravated by not having adequate heart treatment facilities available in the medical center. 101i MSM"IN - Im WI "EONMOIm'MM The statement by the applicant that the primary aim of the proposal is to improve health care for the community is both a problematic and arguable statement, subject to factual scrutiny and challenge from a 2«< « »« of sources and professional opinions. The Association urges the reviewing authorities to focus on the impacts upon adjacent properties and the permanent re- mediation of those impacts to the benefit of the surroundy.. \d egorood. It is the view of the Homeowners Association that in its present form the application fails to meet criteria 3 and 4 of for the Conditional Use Permit provision of the zoning code. The Homeowners Association does not recommend approval of the application at this time in its pres- ent form. 0 0 E Mr. and Mrs. Otto Wiest 122 West M eadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 We are long time property owners of Vail, since 1965. Our Vail home is at 122 West Meadow Drive. We are concerned about the plan to place at mobile laboratory port for large trucks on our residential street at the east side of the Vail Valley Medical Center. We are directly of by this plan. The parking of large trucks in this area is not compatible with our residential neighborhood. We do not believe this is a good location to park trucks. It will be a bad thing to looks at I from our beautiful street and neighboi-hood. The many people who walk down our street, from all over the world, enjoy its beauty as much as we do. With your help, someday we hope to make it even more beautiful. We would like a view corridor for our street so that we can keep industrial uses and other ugly things from being seen by the people who use our street. We ask you not to approve the mobile laboratory port conditional use permit request. Sincerely, Otto and Elke Wiest OR& NELSON AND SCHULM P-A, PAUL E SCHULTZ, RLI), ROOM M CENTRAL MEIRCAL BUILMN(I $94 NORTH uumw ST. PAUL, MINNEWTA $6104 T 00 ZlInHDS InVd NG Z096 VP919 69;()T 96/�?Z/vo m 04/28/95 1a: 69 644 9602 9k PAUL SCHULTZ X3002 L ONE 0 • �' i 1 t ff j '' r��/ t' ' L.j ' { P- L._ 1 ,� f( 11 .� .��...l...i l �./ - /� %li' 1... t . � '', El U-1 E3 [7 MEMB—ANDUM TO- Planning and Environmental Commission SUBJECT: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a liquor store to be located the Cascade Crossing Retail Center, located at 1031 South Frontage Road/ a unplatted parcel located west of the Vail Professional Building and south of 1-7, 71 FApplicant: Andrew Woods, d/b/a Local's Liqu Planner: Mike Mollica i �W In the Arterial Business Zone District (ABD), liquor stores are allowed as a conditional use. Section 18.29.030 lists the conditional uses and states that they have been included as conditional uses, "due to their potential individual and cumulative impacts of generating traffic in the Arteri F:\everyone\pec\memos\cascade.626 A. CQn5ji argq&n f F r _g� 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. Upon review of the request, the Town Staff believes that the proposal will AOL not have a significant impact to the traffic patterns in this area. When the IP Cascade Crossing Retail Center was initially approved by the Town, the Colorado Department of Transportation required that both right and left turn lanes be installed on the South Frontage Road. These improvements have been designed and constructed to accommodate the traffic flows from the Retail Center. Staff believes that a tenant, such as a liquor store, is along the lines of those anticipated when the Trip Generation Analysis was completed and the design of the turn lanes was analyzed. Therefore, the traffic load is generally consistent with the expectations made during the design process. The Town's parking requirement for this tenant space will not change as a result of this proposal for a liquor store., 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. There are no exterior changes proposed with the liquor store proposal. MMMI�� The Pig e F: \everyone\pec\memos\cascade.626 2 U Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department A request or a stioaCK variance - I a ow Tor an arMTTl= 7-r-feslaence locarea 1390 Greenhill Court/Lot 12, Glen Lyon. I Applicant: Summit Vacation Properties Planner Andy Knudtsen F:\everyone\pec\memos\glenlyon.626 C7 Allowed / � sired Existin Proposed Fright: 33ft. 33 ft. No change FA, 6,230.5 sq. ft. 5,207.9 sq.ft. 5,372.9 sq. ft, Setbacks: Front: 20' 24' 24' Sides: 15715' 15715' 51/15' Rear: 15' 140` 140' C7 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution ot population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff believes there will be minimal impact, if any, on the criteria referenced above by thiUroposal. try N l {l v El 11 MENIORAND—UM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission DATE: June 26, 1995 SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to allow for public seating at the at Vail Mall, located at 2151 North Frontage Road/Lot 2, Vail Das Schone Third Filing Applicant: Tom Gart for the West Vail Mail Corporation Planner: any Stouder with be provided to the PEC at the meeting. Staff believes that the material change will make a big difference in the general appearance of the outdoor dining areas. The tables will still be 42" (round) in diameter and the chairs are approximately 24" by 24' . In a worst case scenario, with the chairs fully extended from the table, at least 4 feet of clearance remains for pedestrians or ADA individuals traveling along the sidewalk., Table density has been reduced to facilitate ingress/egress to the shops, and additional trash receptacles have been provided. The applicant has re-stated their commitment to maintain the outdoor seating areas free of trash at all times. The applicant has also agreed to add one 3-inch diamete aspen and 2 shrubs in a grassy area in front of Dairy Queen in an attempt to impro landscaping and screen the tables in this area of the mail. I 1111. BACKGROUND Several restaurants in the mail have already put plastic tables and chairs outside to allow for outdoor dining. These tables have been a point of contention between tenants, specifically, Taco Bell Express (with no inside seating) customers have been using tables placed by Pizza Express and Poppyseeds. The Town has encouraged the mail owners to submit a Conditional Use Permit application to "legalize" the existing tables and add more tables to eliminate the current usage problems. The mail owners agreed with the Town and have made this application in an attempt to resolve the existing problems. The Vail Police Department urges a quick resolution to this issue as they expect pressure to increase between the tenants as the weather continues to improve and the summer tourist season begins in earnest. 2 0 I E I U Relationship and impact of the use on the developmenl objectives of the Town. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. I 3 P 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Staff feels the revised seating, along with the existing Pizza Express seating, will provide adequate capacity to serve all the restaurants at the mail and should eliminate future disputes between tenants over the use of the tables. befor Ii H 1 That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the Conditional Use Permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Conditional Use Permit section of the zoning code. HT, June , 1 i65 SO f i If PFNN5yLVH NtA 5T €dFE i *DE . NVLR, COL SRA. 80210 q 303/771-039f, T I I t-4 -r H I I • June 16, 1995 �l - " �4 IAA,vgv "0 44. p,)A-�r 4-11kk o n St ha hee, 28damete, green pastc abes and f yeas. p s t twelve green plastic chairs. The use of Section "B" as "public" seating does not require the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit request by the PEC. Additionally, the Staff established a position on the definition of outdoor public seating. Again, according to the 1/23/93 memorandum, 11. REVIEW RITERIA FORIHIS-REQUM The review criteria for a request of.this nature are established by the Town of Vail Municipal Code. In addition to the conditional use ©° staff has included criteria from the zoning code, the Vail Comprehensive Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations, as we believe this will help the PEC in its evaluation of the request. The Daily Grind Coffee Company is located in the Commercial Core I (CCI) zone district, According to Section - ° ?: 0 of the zoning code, the purpose of the CCI district of the building scale and architectural qualities ƒm>| / bs the Village." \y \ \< \ \ F:\everyone\pec\memos\dailygrd.626 2 3.3 Objective - Encourage a wide variety of activities, events and street life along pedestrian ways and plazas. 3.3.2 Policy. Outdoor dining is an important streetscape feature and shall be encouraged in commercial in-fill or redevelopment projects." C. THE VAIL, VILLAGE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS According to the Vail Village Design considerations, "dining decks and patios when properly designed, bring people to the streets, provide opportunities to look and be looked at, and generally contribute to the liveliness of the street and making a richer pedestrian environment and experience than if those streets were empty. Decks and patios should be sited and desLigned with due consideration to sun, wind, views and pedestrian activity." A. 0 Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. F:\everyone\pec\memos\dailygrd.626 4 0 I F:\everyoneipec\memos\dailygrd,626 14 B. The area to be used for outdoor display must be directly in front of the establishment displaying the goods and be entirely upon the establishment's own property, Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed by outdoor display. (The same wording is also found in the Commercial Core 11, Commercial Core III, and Commercial Service Center zone districts.) F77M 2.) Outdoor Dining Decks and Vending Carts: Outdoor dining decks associated with restaurants are allowed in certain zoning districts with a Conditional Use permit that has been granted by the PE. It is the staff's position that once an outdoor dining deck has been approved for a specific location associated with a restaurant® the restaurant operation may place a service cart on that deck (i.e. an espresso cart), subject to DRB approval of the cart. It is also the staff's 0