Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-0814 PEC'Yff I'S CEWCY,00 PUBLIC NOTICE M NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on August 14, 1995, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: 1 A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for an addition to the Town of Vail Publm Works Administration Building and a renovation to the Transportation and Fleet Maintenance Bungs located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/on an unplatted tract, located north of Vail Village, Eighth Filing. I Applicant: Town of Vail Planner Andy Knutdsen t. A request for a site coverage variance to allow for additions to the existing residence located at 1868 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 47, Vail Village West Filing #1. Applicant: John and Bobbi Ann Houtsma Planner- George Ruther 17 1 M 3. A request for a setback variance to allow for an addition ot the existing residence located at 5119 Black Bear Lane/Lot 8, Block 2, Gore Creek Subdivision. Applicant: Ron and Chris Yaros Planner: George Ruther 4. A request for a major SDD amendment, located at the Vail Athletic Club/ 352 East Meadow Drive and more specifically described as follows: FAeveryone\pec\no1ices\08 1496 F:\everyone \pec\n etices \089 495 • August 14, 1995 AGENDA ProiecLO)rientatign Lunch Sits visits 1® Hout - 1868 West Gore Creek Drive 2. Yaros - 5119 Black Bear Lane ® VVMC - 181 West Meadow Drive Driver: George MEM Public Hearing 2® p.m. 1® A request for a site coverage variance to allow for additions to the existing residence 1 at 1868 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 47, Vail Village West Filing 41. 1 S. Council Reports @ Vail Conunons. 9® Approval of July 24, 1995 PEC minutes. 0 FAeveryon6pecNagendas\08 1495 T0n 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Attorney Vail, Colorado 51657 970 - 479 -21071 970 -479 -2157 MEMORANDUM TGa Town Council Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department FROM: R. Thomas Moorhead DATE: August 11, 1995 Red Employee Housing Requirement for Conditional Use Permit in General Use District 1 have been asked to review our General Use District zoning requirements and Conditional Use Permits to determine whether it is appropriate to require affordable housing to be provided as a condition of approval • RECYCLED PAPER There has been some comparison of the Special Development District to the General Use District, I do not believe that there is similarity between the two sections that enable the Planning & Environmental Commission and Town Council to handle them in the same fashion, Under the Special Development District it is stated within its purpose "to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan," Also under the procedures, the Commission and Council will examine the relationship of the plan to the applicable elements of the Town of Vail Master Plan. Under the SDD since there is the possibility of approval of development standards that deviate from the underlying zoning, it should be determined that the deviation provides benefits that qW outweigh its adverse effects. Keeping those requirements in mind, it is appropriate to exact housing under certain circumstances for a Special Development District. of housing in connection with the application, A negotiated development agreement is an effectivo tool for increasing the stock of necessary housing in the community, I believe that under certain applications for Conditional Use Permit within a General Use District will provide an opportunity under certain circumstances to require housing, it is not true in every instance. I hope this information is helpful and I am willing to respond to any additional requests. Thanks. RTM/aw Community Development Department [7 U] F:\everyone\pec\mernos\houtsma.814 0 At the Mumma residence, the applicant requested and was granted a I% site coverage variance in order to construct a garage addition on a lot that exceeds 30% slope. The 1 % overage on site coverage amounted to approximately 99 square feet. The interior dimensions of the approved garage measure 20 feet by 20 feet, for a total interior area of 400 square feet. The garage contributed 442 square feet toward site coverage. At the Smail residence, the applicant requested and was granted side and front setback variances in order to construct a garage and GRFA addition. The interior dimensions of the approved garage measure 22 feet 8-inches by 22 feet 3-inches (504 square feet). Please note that a site coverage variance was not necessary as a part of this request. RINI At the Testwuide residence, the applicant requested and was granted side and front setback variances in order to construct a garage addition to the existing residence. The approved garage had interior dimensions of 21.5 feet by 24 feet, with a total interior area of 516 square feet. Please note that a site coverage variance was not necessary as part of this request. F:\everyone\pec\memos\houtsma.814 2 Ill. ZONING TI °TIC Lot Size: 103,977 square feet Zoning: Primary /Secondary Residential Allowed Pro used . GRFA: 3,594 sq. ft. 2,421 s .ft. Setbacks: Front: 20' Front: 1.5 Sides: 15 Sides: 15' 35' Rear: 15' Rear: 53' Site Coverage: 15% or 1,646 sq. ft. 16.6 or 1,629 sq. M Landscaping: 6O% or 6,552 sq. ft. 77% or 3,437 s.. Retaining Wall heights: 6 feet (max.) 4 feet Parking: 4 spaces required 4 spaces D D F. \everyone \pec \memos \hcutsma.814 Staff does not believe that there will be any negative impacts associat with this proposal, if constructed, on the above referenced cril: i B. The Plannina and Environmental Commission shall makejbg_fg!Lg��� before gfraanntmig-a a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specifil regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this l b There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. C. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. m J-j re .a —, , J Lu SUBJECT: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the Vail Valley Medical Center to park a mobile catheter lab west of the Ambulance District's Building, located at 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E and F, Block 1, Vail Village 2nd Filing. The attached site plan shows the proposed lab location. An elevation drawing has beer provided to give the PEC a perspective of how the lab will appear in the proposed location. A concrete pad is required to level and support the mobile lab. The proposed location will not require the removal of any vegetation. A light post will need to be removed and 6 large spruce trees are proposed on the bank above the lab to screen it from the Evergreen Lodge. 1 6 Ill. ZONING ANALYSIS In the Public Use District, hospitals are considered to be conditional uses. Any expansion of the hospital is subject to review using the conditional use permit criteria and findings, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16.60 of the Town of Vail Zoning Code. The mobile catheter lab is considered to be an accessory use to the hospital and is an expansion of an existing conditional use. IV. QRrTERIA AND FINDINGS A. Consideration of F ctors: 1 Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. The proposed use will have a positive benefit to the community in that a service that currently must be provided by traveling to Denver will be available to community residents in Vail. The temporary nature of the use will minimize the impacts to surrounding properties and the only permanent improvements that will be located on the property include a concrete pad that will replace a section of asphalt, and the utility hook-up pedestals. Much needed landscaping will be provided along the hillside between the proposed location for the lab and the Evergreen Lodge. This hillside is currently devoid of any vegetation that would provide an effective screen, thus the proposal of landscaping in this area will have a significant benefit to the residents in the Evergreen. Staff believes the landscaping will not only screen the catheter lab when it is on its pad but it will also provide a permanent screen between the hospital and the Evergreen Lodge. 2. The effect oft the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation f cilities, utilities, schools, par recreation facilities, and other public facilities s. The proposed use will have no impact on light and air distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities. The proposed use will have a positive impact on public facilities needs, in that a valuable medical service will be provided within the community that is not currently available. 2 H Staff feels that the lab should not be scheduled during peak skier periods. »w regarding this issue is proposed. The applicant has agreed to schedule the lab on days © the Eagle Care Clinic © not open. Four (4) parking spaces are allotted for clinic use currently. This will allow the lab operating staff and patients to utilize the four vacant spaces. S. a M F:\everyone\pec\memos\vvmccup.814 0 [l 7 4� / ® 9 WATER 9 MANHOLE FOR �e t m w H it valley 1€31 ;Nest Meadow (give, Suite 100 Vail, Colorado £3165r medical ! ( 303) 476 -2451 Mi } August 7, 1995 Mr. Randy Sto der Community Development Department Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Nail, CO 81657 RE: Mobile Catheterization Lab Dear Randy, We wish to revise our application for a conditional use permit for the mobile catheterization lab, as shown on the attached drawings. Essentially, we are proposing that the lab be located in our west parking lot, neat to the timber retaining wall. To mitigate the visual impact to the Evergreen Hotel, we will plant a total of six blue spruce trees on the sloped bank between our two properties. Three of the trees will be 10 -13 feet tall, and three will be 12 -15 feet tall. When the lab is in place, it will occupy four parking spaces. Our .Eagle Care Clinic, which is open only three days per week, has four spaces; available to it on a full -time basis. (See my letter to Shelly hello, dated 23 August 1993, Copy attached, which recaps parking availability and needs.) we will propose limiting cath lab visits to days that the Eagle Care Clinic is closed, days on which these four spaces are not needed. As stated in my previous letter of 20 June 95, the lab should be treated as the equivalent of one exam room, thus requiring one parking space. We have one surplus space presently available. The two technicians who operate the lab will arrive in a separate vehicle, which they will park adjacent to the lab, thus creating a new parking space during lab visits. As stated previously, the generator which is housed in the lab will not normally be run. However, if a patient is undergoing a catheterization when a power outage occurs, it will be necessary to run the generator until the procedure is complete. Although the probability of this occurring is quite low, it may happen from time to time. Ray McMahan Chief Executive Off j 4 DF\kr enclosures ' Ray McMahan Chief Executive Officer I MIN TO: Planning and Environmental Commission SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a remodel to the Vail Golf Course Maintenance Facility located at 1278 Vail Valley Drive/ Parcel E, Vail Village 7th Filing. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Russ Forrest 3111�� �.-- The Vail Golf Course Maintenance Facility has existed on the site since 1966. The property is owned by the Town of Vail and leased to the Vail Recreation District (VRD). [11 C C "The General Use District is intended to provide sites for public and quasi- uses and is intended public to ensure that pubic buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi-public uses permitted in the District are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other structures, to ensure adequate light, air open spaces and other amenities appropriate with the permitted types of uses." Staff believes that the expansion to the Golf Course Maintenance facility is consistent with the goals of these purpose sections of the zoning code. The buildings on the site are public facilities and contribute to the Town's effort to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail. B. Effect of the use on it and air distribution 0 )ulation tran li i no Cher bli Staff believes that the proposed improvements will allow the Vail Recreation District to better maintain the Vail golf course, which is a major recreational amenity in the Town. This proposal will also improve the aesthetic appearance of a public facility. C. i o n ut m iv e pedestrian safet and convenience traffic flow and control access maneuverability and rerr�oval of snow from the streets and Ark area This proposal will provide designated parking for the facility, where there is not any currently. There will be a total of 21 parking sites on the site. There will bd no negative impact on congestion, traffic f low, access or removal of snow. Pedestrian safety should be improved with the installation of stop signs at the exit of the facility. Safety could be improved by having a designated entrance and exit to the facility. D. r000se use is located incluin the sc In bulk of the rep se use in re rr n in use Landscaping Staff believes that one of the most significant issues regarding this proposal is screening the site from surrounding uses. The berm located at the southwest corner of the facility will help screen the trash enclosure. However, 1' or 2' of concrete will still be exposed to the street. Staff would recommend that a wood siding be placed on the exposed concrete. The installation of a new fence along the north boundary will also improve the appearance of the site from adjacent properties. New vegetation that would be planted on the site is described below: 0 Lan Wi CgmmQn Name Q -4 L 7 Blue Spruce 12 feet 10 Blue Spruce 10 feet 10 Quaking Aspen 2 inch 1 5 Evergreen Shrubs (must be a minimum of 1 8 inches) The applicaff also moved the above grou i » 2< to w e lanascape I between the access roads (where the fueling area is currently). This will buffer the above ground tank from the road. 32�Z- ■ • �Y i - � �` ®�sr. *1 #W E 111, ZQNIN TATI 110 0�� Ill Jill Jill 1 11 1 111 111 !Ill I '' Iiiiiiiiiiii, A oved SDID 2p Ey—isi uildin A Height: 51 % max. 40 feel 47 feel 30 feet/20 feet 49 max. 32 feet Setbacks: Per development plan: N: 2 feet N: 18 feet IN: 28 feel S: 8 feel S: 31 feel S: 33 feet E: 30 feel E: 425 feel E: 425 feel W: 15 feel W: 82 feet W 94 feel Sire am Setback: 50 feel from centerline 59 feel building 61 feel building an — on rade arking Site Coverage: 37% or 29,010.9 sq. ft. Landscaping: 60% or 47,044.8 sq. ft, (min.) Parking: Per Town of Vail regulations (100 spaces enclosed) Commercial Floor Area: 32,314 sq. ft 4. 5. 53 feel on- grade parking 8.3% or 6,551 sq. ft. 62.9% or 49,345 sq. ft. 78 spaces required 78 spaces proposed Gross: 23,918 Nei: 19,736 9 V 7.4% or 5,791 sq. ft. N/A 52 spaces required 53 spaces provided Gross: 15, 391 Nei: 13,087 / — —A— N, Ll The applicant has agreed to place a Type If employee unit deed restriction on an off -site secondary dwelling unit as compensation for the loss of the two Type III EH U's. Staff finds this acceptable since this proposal is a much smaller expansion than the Brewery. 4 C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 18.52. D. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and Urban Design Plans. General Growth and Development E streambank areas, but significant impacts could still occur. Staff will work with the applicant to red related to the installation of the parking lot retaining �43 wall and storm sewer pipes that convey parking lot runoff down to Gore Creek. The applicant has revised plans to minimize disturbance to the extent feasible. The applicant has also provided the minimum amount of parking lot area necessary to meet the parking standards for the Town. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimi and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. i 11 SCALE: t' = 20* \7E OF SURVEY: 5/13/94 •^+• �s ^4C 81 5 OONI S ° rE ANC °9'.:bi J £ d AM amm" r � Y� POWER POLE 9de 8d 20 C EL m 9 ID fi I Of Ll M%RY P= SCHE ► mom P— owv— oft— C.M� 74 641Y, &Jr, 7.10 No PW— —%"-W 0-d" AV— tbr, IS4V~ ago= ae jw� ft W GLQ Ak�pftft m O..W w = Omw A— 'l 06 C-"- 4w 04 V�m V..WM -A�ft , RUE !2 no� 3r ® -c. Oftw_ m WMC4 WWW WW�W O.r- T*Mkft ft—q AmUn 9de 8d 20 C EL m 9 ID fi I Of Ll hu-NIMMIRLWAim Applicant: Ron and Chris Yaros Planner- George Ruther v I. ZONING STAT11RT1r, Lot Size: 11,014.4 sq. ft.10.253 acres Zoning: Two Family Residential Allowed EA tin PE used fi A: 3,178.6 sq. ft. 1,681sq. ft. 2,509sq.ft. Setbacks: Front: 20 40° 40° Sides: 15715° 3775.5° 2674° Rear: 15 42 39" Parking: 3 spaces (required) 3 spaces 3 spaces III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends denial of the requested variance based on the following factors: A. Consideration of Factors The relationship oft the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The proposed residential and garage addition to the east side of the existing residence would encroach to within 4.5' of the eastern property line. While it is true that a 98 sq. ft. portion of the residence and 10 s. ft. of the existing garage is already in the east side setback, it is staff s opinion that further encroachment into the east side setback will have a negative impact on the adjoining lot. The adjoining, vacant lot to the east (Lot ) averages approximately 5` in width and 100 in depth. A residence constructed on Lot 9 in the future would be somewhat restricted as to the location of the structure because of required setbacks and natural features on the lot. Any further encroachment of the residence on Lot S into the setback could thus negatively impact fature development in the area. Staff acknowledges the applicant's desire to construct an addition to their existing residence on the side opposite the multi-family building to the west. However, it is staff's opinion that an addition could occur off of the north and west sides of the residence. Construction off of the north and 2 west sides of the existing residence would not be located within any required side or rear setback (see attached site plan). Any possible negative impacts associated with building adjacent to the neighboring multi-family building could be mitigated through additional landscaping and creative interior floor plan design. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 0 0� PARCEL H 14 13 12 G 7 5157 5167 6 5137 5147 5 5827 6C1aE d I 4 5117 �O� 5177 5107 O 5136 3 2 4 4 n Y PRIMA R1° 3 6 6 F 10 5097 5187 HEATHERVOOD TOW 2 2 IFTH eL aiouSE n, �� > 3S 1 1 5n57 aj 5 9 — �" 5033 5035 1 �� 511 6 7 5 5169 5497 503 - 5036 5189 5839 5159 520 5925 p 50 i 1 5047 5056 5089 CIRCLE `7 5198 5030 r e 50 0 GO�tb 6 5188 V 4 � ,n\ �� 56 &6 —1-5 n ��/ �– 5036 5 i RACT TR. 5 ° Sur,uIAL , 3 4 5149 PHASE 2 509® ' � - 5 1 5086 5116 5126 � 1 4 577 0 ®3 ® 5027 177 517 ® 518 6 I 7 6 1 -5 1 -4 ICw 12 12 13 14 5165 176 2 — HEATHER OF VAIL 4887 4907 7 1 2 23 1275129 5133 IS 17 5 4 502 5016. KEL LP7 5135. 16 4 6 3 I 4 91 7 4 3 2 1 3 51 x,51 5166 F I L I NG 776 4916 0 5006 5111 2 3 � 4 4937 4957 4977 4997 1 4 I 5128 5 4 5122 6 3 2 7 THIS ROAD p0E5 NOT sl 1 I 1 49 6 pjt4jpER L" �5y� 5014 � S 5107 q� 15106 5126 6 9 6 EXIST AT THIS TIME 17 5 4936 4 5 H 5015, 5383 4 1 5114 5134 9 7 �y t 83 4859 { 1 6 4946 4966 4999 5024 1 3 � . 5 �2 5136 10 1 5030 5 4 5054 � 5074 �4® 15 11 6 I C7� 979 14 4969 4998 . SOUTH 5004 7 '� 10 11 t ED 1929 2 0 4989 13 19 34 i 5104 �� 5142 12 R 4940 4899 12 16 20 5 5045 _ _.� 4 3 4939 4978 33 5047 J 2 °3 C ® e 51 51 4949 5075 26 �' d2 32 a 16 7 4866 0 17 5037 5095 2 5135 ®CsJ 5154 13 14 5194 4919 15 91 5164 5174 46 0 6 ; 16 31 48t6 2 10 11 98 5027 30 5053 v� 17 48424852 12 5038 13 I4 25 �z. 20 76 5195 4862 4872 8 5033 ��sd 5155 19 5385 5165 5175 24 21 UNPLATTED 5C33 22 50 42 UNPLATTED 1 23 5032 46 t 5002 SCALE= 1 ° 's20C1' x00` 0' ro. � '! �� au • • • • • 1 . l I 11(o 6Lt b TO: Planning and Environmental Commission *ATE: August 14, 1995 SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an addition and remodel to the Town of Vail Public Works Administration Building and a remodel to the Transportation and Fleet Maintenance Buildings located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/on an unplatted tract, located north of Vail Village, Eighth Filing. Applicant Town of Vail Planner: Andy Knudtsen mnnm: Phase two includes additions to the Fleet Maintenance and Bus Barn vehicle parking area, vehicle wash and fueling facilities, driver's lounge and lockers, vehicle body shop and chassis wash bays, the welding shop, and the vehicle repair bay. The additional floor area is approximately 13,700 square feet. The existing fueling station and the existing bus wash will be removed. A FA The purpose section of the Conditional Use section of the zoning code, Section 18.60.010, states that: "Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review and evaluation so that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with respect the their effects on surrounding properties." The purpose section of the General Use District of the zoning code, Section 18.36.010, states that: "The General Use District • is intended to provide sites for public and quask public uses and is intended to ensure that pubic buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi-public uses permitted in the District are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other structures, to ensure adequate light, air open spaces and other amens appropriate with the permitted types of uses." .L.,, .,,F.==f7e expansions R7770 * s art cli the goals of these purpose sections of the zoning code. The buildings on the site »-p < lities and contribute to the Town's effort to meet the needs of residents and visitors ?Vai il. 2� Effect of the use on n fadlities, utilities, schools, parks and rg�� �fil�i �J�� facilities. Staff believes that the proposed improvements will have positive effects on the criteria listed above. In particular, the proposal will have a positive w.v® on the transportation facilities of the community. 3. manguygrgbility, and removal,, q3�� of -now from the streets and parkniDg _&rg-L r7w L ■ ml I am I I EM 0 *29 - 6" tall Spruce-, Lighting Staff worked with Jennifer Decker, an architect with Morter Architects, and drove the neighborhoods around the Public Works site in the evening to identify the lights that create glare from the Public Works site. A lighting plan has been provided which addresses all of the fixtures that generate glare. Some of the proposed solutions to the glare problem include eliminating three Town and Country lights and reolacino Wern wiih fWllj -j ii ej, g jenjacin , We exisfina I 11un, V,;ILII L;dll Awns7-dilu 111&�IVall Pau& Oil ine Da'5 d5n (when the bus wash facility is removed). Staff believes that the lighting plan has been thoroughly addressed and will significantly improve the appearance of theF site from adjacent properties. 5. Other factors as the Corr mission deems applicable to the s_ . � -pLQpg5gJ ujo At the PEC worksession, there was extensive discussion about safety issues and employee housing issues. Staff believes that they most appropriately fall under this criteria. Housing Concerning housing, Public Works is not proposing to add any additional employees as a result of the proposed addition and remodel, and therefore, cannot be required to provide employee housing as a condition of the Conditional Use Permit approval. 4 V E TO- Andy Knudtsen/Planning FROM Russell Forrest DATE August 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Public N� Maintenance Facility Remodel After reNieN ing, the submittal for the Public Works remodel I would strongly recommend the followine: 1) All fueling tanks should be above ground with secondary containment large enough to accomrnodate the volume of Product stored in the tanks. Above ground tanks are much safer from an environmental liability standpoint. Above ground tanks must also be protected from , impact, 2) All containers (Maenesiiin, Chloride, Waste Oil ) with hazardous materials or waste must have secondary containment. For example, the waste oil container must have secondary containment to contain a complete spill of that container and also to accornmodate a 20 year rain event. RECYCLED PAPER to ac r� I " f r-Z HU I - I � 05- kl�,L -h MEMORANDUM To Knudtsen Cornmunfty Development Department Town of Vail, Colorado employees. The employees that currenl]y park west of the building at the top of the hill will move do" along the berm or east of the Administration Building. Once Phase It is complete and the fuel island is relocated, additional parking will be available along the be t . : 11 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SEVENTFEIN7[i SI'P4L-, 7LAX SUITV 1700 1225 SEVENTUNIT14 M PET DENNM C011,0RADC A0202 3013"A7117 UWE, • =Qicme After Addil Greg Hall PW Admin Lot East along hill Terri Martinez Berm''across from Same BusL Barn Charlie Davis Berit across from Same Bus Barn Iodd Oppenheimer Berm Across from Same B Barn Greg Barrie Berm Across from Same Bus Barn Ftiture Eng. Tech N/A East along ln.il.L Nit increase in employees — (1). • Hi.. z Div " j:, U::+ - C- ,®.Y"!'o mI IL- 1) L�-Z .L kz� I somb N ONE Room Bonn 0 • M_ilz Nunn noun Oman mamp The plans show the proposed located of twelve studio type employee housing units. This work can be completed whenever financing is available, and is not currently linked with any other construction on the Public Works site. Public Works is currently exploring development and financing options for the employee housing with yourself and the Town Council. Public Works will keep you informed of their progress in the process, There are a number of design and site secuirity issues with the combination of housing and the Public Works facilities. A reasonable number of units is important not to overtax the tight entrance to the site, or introduce people on the site who would violate Public Works'facifities and matedals. Much of the existing outdoor storage is non-secure, and will remain so. These issues need to be reviewed in determining the number of units and location of units to be developed. is 11 *� WXT IMM 'qt1*w1jr 1, According to the Uniform Fire Code, Class I (gasoline) and Class 11 (diesel) storage tanks shall be located underground unless it is impractical or there are property or building limitations. (See attached copies of code.) Am 1 Typically, leaks that do occur with underground tanks occur in the piping, not in the tank, We 1 "W are proposing a double walled fiberglass tank that meets all governing standards (see attached out sheets), Locating the tanks above ground would require longer lengths of underground piping increasing the risk of leakage. By locating the tanks where we have, the length of pipe has been minimized. 4, Above ground tanks on the north side of the building would also be at risk because of the potential for ice build-up in an area with significant truck traffic. It is our opinion that the risk of damage to the tanks due to trucks sliding on ice is far greater if they are above ground rather than underground. Hu Uc- -, Iva 6:".Lorlh mil� ffl�� Cl • Hu�z k6c- JUL 06 '94 09:44 FR FLUID CONTAINMENT TX 409 756 79565 TO 13038205272 P.oi/09 LA [ A tory-installed rnomitoring fluid. a simplified jobaite hydrostatic test procedure can be use4, . activated by filling at the jobsite, the tanK cavity mus" be filled oy pouring the liquid i ntc , . I — . n—ning an iocat climate, use t2p water or an acceptable antifreeze rni,KWreas the monitoring �uid. at accordng to the current installation instructions (Ruid Containment Pub.No. 6304) provided with the tank. Long Form; Section 13200 Guide Specification Fluid GQnitainmertt Double-Wall Fiberglass Reinforced D. Installation Instructions Contractors shall submit — coPies of manufacturer's latest installation instructions, F Calibration Charts- COntractors shall sub- Mil —Copies of manufacturers latest cal. ohai%s, 0. Monitoring Capaoilitles 1. Tanks shall have a space between "ne P�- W I er soon mass SEEM Emus A phasing plan drawing has been added at V-50'scale. The plan shows Phase I and 11 as proposed, the north retaining wall proposed for development in 1999, and other future projects identified in ft Public Works Master Plan, The development of the site and facilities is limited by available funding, which is outlined below 1996 $426,000 Administration Building with associated entrance stair, parking,Inds in nd hazard mitigation. Upgrade electrical service to the shops building and add one new vehicle lift in fleet. 1996 $2.1 million Transportaflan addition, fuel and wash facility replacement, partial fleet expansion and welding shop relocation. Enhance landscaping along the berm and extend hazard mitigation behind the shops building. Improve Site Entrance signage. 1997 $200,000 Project to be identified 1998 -0- No Funding 1999 $21 million Expansion of usable she area and construction of north retaining wall. Re-vegetation and regrading Mang north side of site. No regrading is proposed in the current phases on forest service property. No additional excavation will be done on the site to complete Phases I and H as identified. The phasing plan shows the edge of the usable property on the north side of the facility, which will be maintained until the site is expanded in 1999. Some fill material will be removed directly behind and adjacent to the shops building to allow for the expansion of the fleet facility and relocation/expanslon of the weldinp shop. • A follow-up review by Art Mears will occur in mid-Augmst. Two debris flow ohanneis are proposed around the Administration building per Mears' latest report The area required to contain a debris flow and any requirements for rockfali mitigation will be addressed by Art in his follow-up review, ,VO TF .' SffF L^AIVO,56AP6F pl ANj5� ropa U PpATED PLAIJ7 INF-o"Alr101V v d ° m r- WAVAM i f �x,4f� [ 0 0 0 � � LEGEND A cuf ixx�co ,� , D I'Iw _ SAmCUTING AHE AS OG EXISTING PAVEMLNt, �f+[rotSia+S � �roiil caa+eDO �� p 1 1lLI RE HOVE PAV£uf:Nt. NEW 6'ULL DEPTH PAVEMENT, MATCH EXIST ING• WErodbtPvS BUT SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 4' IN THl CHNESS. ` { ` WALL OP L A LL 51 CONSTRUCTION NOTES PROVIDE AN 8'X20' HANDICAP PARKING Al t,l 5' SC ItIaC #5» DO tH SIDES. INCLUDING 6 4" WHITE IN RNNELASTIC PAVEMENT Sfq IP ING AND PAVEMENT SIMBOL. \ # TEL -- - (g� EX IST INC LIGHT STANDARD TO BE RELOCATED. SEE ARCH I PECTUAAL DRAWINGS. A \\ f65 ....... ® 119) ° SERS IB I R E D ' \ J PROV L61 4'X4' PLANT. SEE LANDSCAP •. � ` f ... N_._ BflAm NGS. PLANTERS. ° f- °• (� PROVIDE 5 -SLOT VISITOR PARKING. 9'X20' INCLUDING ®° WHITE THERMOPLASTIC \ ✓ �._ ., PAVEMENT STRIPING. PROVIDE FULL DEPTH ASPHALT REPLACEMENT \ v N P HN MATCH E XISTI NG Nlc Ess. o (D INSTALL NEW IS' CAS WITH END SECTI ON AND INLET \ o,l ° . R.... aND IX1YLEi AtPRAP PROTECTEION. 050 m 6 °. / LIMITS OF EXIST 9wG BEHOVE EXISTING PIPE eSPHAIi ADMINISTRAiIDN °J -- 7DP DF mALL ib'' BUILDING (MATCH E%i 5P.,3 Q PROVIDE A 17'X20' PLANTER, SEE LANDSCAPE '...��� FEE 57.5 ' DRAWINGS. VO \q ' ( N „ " ,./' °~ PROVIDE PLANTER . SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. (p�, REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT FOR NEW BUILDING 6 / ' I ADBITION. NEW ADDITION= BEHOVE NAwDRatL. (�} FEE 57.5 ) ° ALL EXISTING ASHHALT IDENTIFIED RITNIN THE fp f 0 8 7 �' AOMI NISTRATIO+d BUILDING AND DRIVEWAY SHALL dhR DFmkL(. 49 +v RECEIVE A TACK COAT AND M OVERLAY. APPLY LEVELING COURSE WHERE NEEDED. J AS CG4Sit,KtED g " p' DItl19 {CN ' -- g -::-EI a6 RE ISED =VOID= v1I9 CDI.�aDO v �� V �v[BiWh i E TSF. FOPO NAY NIY REELECT 0.CPUAL {P(� \, ''" '' - LEGEND ' TOPDGRkPHY IN AEL' CASES / '— € 95TING PAVEMEN EkISYe. REM ES FLOW 6HAnNEt Nay ACBUALLY g5 ' "' — ^ — . — AOT 5 TA z' BOTTOw �ENOdE IP`vEwa. X CONSTRUCTION NOTES PAVEMENT. MATCH Ex ISTI NC. NEW FL DEPTH _ I BUT $HAL BEN LESS THAN 4 IN TH ICHNESS. Q PROVIDE AN B'%20' HANDICAP PARKING e WITN Y SETBACKS Ow BOTH SIDES, 7w6LU0Iw 4" M41TE THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT STRIPING a .. RELOCATED, .. 1 4IN L f P S D R TO BE ' EX15TING BTICFUR STANDARD . ~" P PROVIDE STAIRS. It69 I9 TREADS PROPOSE',D GRADING FOR'DEBRIS ONTRD fl491 B. 5 RISERS• "� - PROVIDE (4) 4'x8' PLANTERS. SEE LANDSCAPE DRA:Na S. ¢ .a .. _ .. __ .. _ P. \ ... 110111E 5 -1LIT VISITOR PARKING+ 9'120' 1... -„_`� _. �_. __ .a- °v .. INCLUDING 4' WRITE YHER.CV4,411C _:�_. - - '. �m, I t -.. / ..... "':: m _ \ M e--- °-- - ^ -^a. ` PAVEMENT STRIPING. .__ _ .,- .._ _ \\ �" (1) PRDVIDE F ULL OE ASPHALT REPL IICEIk PoT. / 1 _ NA76N E%ISTI PSPING YN THI ICHNESS. ` "" - ._ - - ^' ^.'' (D INST OUT ET 98` C"' WITH ENO SECTION AND INLET _. , -q,- -,, '- AND OUTLET RIPRAP PROTECTION. D50 ® G'. t � ! ��/..+ -`�, (1) REMOVE EXISTING PIPE A '- P R OV IDE RID A 97 PLANTER. SEE LANDSCAPE OF, OP 59 \ - %` - P ... DRAWINGS, 94` WAL O EXISTING ASPHALT FOR NEW BUILDING .. REMOVE PROVID SEE LANDSCAPE RAVINGS ADDITION. REMOVE HANDRAIL. 0 ALL EXISTING ASHPAI.T IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE XISTING �~~ ~ si °° ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND DRIVEWAY SHALL ^' rY ° ! ADMINISTRATION R - �,. RECEIVE A TACK COAT AND II II + OVERLAY. APPLY Bu COURSE WHERE NEEDED. r FFE 51.4 fb P IbMt, LIMI IST. ASPHALT \ P / NEW ADDITION \ BUS WASH \ p I it ,'� FEE 57.5 I PO BE E RE WVD) Rq3 ¢ PE vu PA E YD PRDVIDE 5 FOR ADECUATE DRA R P wo ADU$E Er °A 4 PPP a 19 _ ` 7 / J aLx 20 90 @ 20 4EEC ---- � }a_ ces CALF I Carter I. Burspess awe am-ueo Em� s » uo-a - _ 1 RThT RANSPORTABTIO W0 N ' GAS BAY (TO BE REMOVED) TOWN OF d!AIL T� GRADING AND SITE PLAN NCF 4 WN _ ma 9n d sax ar >,u D8 • • � __. PKA,WIQ4 LV 5 uET, V AT 543 --H bl.o .11, 1. wA. F.r-- ml.111. 2-11� 19 eW puc H. 70 !!T - Esteoullu '" - 1` TATE 7Q _ A StP,p�_ - - -� - os VOE 7 c ) �� - _ �� _ - _ P's, RD � t PC E RpAa UL PUBLIC -WORKS- NDM7Nl WArION OUW[Ne FrXfNNkAL PCO 0) co9 r9 WoA t 1 9A wn9 (4)OA —CI)CO9TRAN9Ft" -'A v rrgfNNM PfD --- ------------------------ ALL NN Alt W"-� PLNWrf,WCA WU PE MKCIMM Py 26O. rO A T 0 r/ L Cr 9P ro PC rKmrGrrD ho 5 0 A9 ---------------- pKNC if WVNI (1) OA (!)OA rlvr I iYw i 4�� 8011-PlAf6 6ONTIIVOES At-ON GPI S106 To POOP- Lfl55 g,1E -70.- S�VYH FRpNi PGE RO PO � PST a t -----. - r , a _ - _. - -_ r - Lfl55 g,1E -70.- S�VYH FRpNi PGE RO PO � PST a t -----. - I I ------------ ---- ---------------------- ----- -------------- A, A —1. ALL, id BE a 6¢ A, As I.T 101A15 1. 18 1-1 ..U. A- ­.­ G­ GAL —f—ER — -­G A­ o- .-.G R S.,AA­ 5 —L. CGNIALAIR 1.1 LKIIEL. SA. Lo �S GARAGE v&s Wyt I I O Q'A --A-,,4FUELING AREA ADDITION FLOOR PLAN In ava ten. aae�ew 7 1�0 ij IL I , F- 11 11 I In ava ten. aae�ew 7 1�0 ij o MAINTENANCE ADDITION FLOOR PLAN EJL- ..... . ...... . .................... ........ .................. - wry --L=- ®a AO-- T - PUBLIC - WORKS - !g:A 1 02 ------------ ------ --------------------------- .... . .... ........ ... MAINTENANCE ADDITION FLOOR PLAN EJL- ..... . ...... . .................... ........ .................. - wry --L=- ®a AO-- T - PUBLIC - WORKS - !g:A 1 02 YL LP�vP i =I PdV�M1�tq� A4 W Q tom. i 5 4 3 2 1 wartrirtwa Ac7vAa. tau T>Fk ° a -➢wa rai° tans wa . (A41 � •/ .- ` — E i -2$ SA04 APB �� 6 °F8 ®d- C9EPHl� tf�Pd T ➢qd ,. [�.., ��..:. i0.B T0➢6.KP FV�FETtODd i0-I® T & i i3 l .: UGG— Cq4 $>aiBiN"P :..i IY i i cm r®uL� EV@Fft t% PI $ reExx $cu. HAW W0.RM1 130 PflJP�/O�GRKRCYRM1 ® $P3dJwCD ®T t R � DO vESrLE /� f ®® - ALx+$a. six KxEC. asrxaETArav a M4JYt PA &K® S-0N$YR�TICmd IPoTENC+[M FURGb6AtiNG ➢NHS e c ', Ec°T Y STf4iNCf1F T" @tl6iM Ewl "LIC PIRRGT[ cm i MOTH QW 847 VAIL PUDUC WORKS - apwsv °etoH ae® d Tw ® Ab F°I,�CBI2 P � A$Q� ., ® A'_ti' e v e a e a s s a s c m P A ® 0 ® a T 9 • • • 0 0 0 - - - - - - - -_ ------------ — — — - -` ----------------- - - - -- -- — - - -- - - - -- mm 1 i i 1 1 I f 1 � I 1 1 i I 1 i 1 --------------- ®.— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - I e �.._,_.— ._ --.- -f ----- ------- ------- $ #t6 DEW TD L BAIL PUBLIC WORKS .o erxa a sro�.cs �uuawc rumrs+ Al Rc30 PUN _ A106 us 0 0 n 9 i hi{­ K.,L_ ✓ ' I - i '3 r, IL_ L 'i F ON T ANA by S7ER�1�R TjN1T1ZtD BALIAST/REFLECTOR SYSTEM'. I 9 Hinged and removable as a unit * Easily accessed for installation and maIntenance a Automatic primary disconnect SE-UED OPTICS'- TEMPERED GiAss LEIS® EXTRUDED ALUMINum LENS FR&ME WI'TliOUT WELDS • Accurately mitered corners L secured with internal corner keys • Quick release safety latch EXTRUDED ALUMINUM HOUSING - Raditis die-formed from single extrusion - Easy push button latch access for quick relamping FLEXIBLE PHOTOMETRICS, OPTIONS: HIDRO-FORMED SEMI.-SPECULAR PCEFLECTOR SYSTEM. a Photoelectric control recEPLac:le & p or wall mounted - Powder coat, baked enarnel or anodic hard coat finish in a wide color ranve 5 F FIXTURE DATA RECDMMENDED STANDARD ARM MOUNTING HEIGHT F IXTU RE WATTAGE LUMINAIRE SIZE DIMENSIONS x 2"x3'x3' TV x 20' 250 mm x 20' to 40' fixture muo up BT3 t� Halide c o m mp of C37 high pressure SUM FH '1000 "' an fl aled) reftencK meo* : 311000 6 jUre VMS q l orWar � . prow ( reek= 955EM* Of �Juslob bi4ipral (noma 16 / VV c y" I W&__ FONTANA N il August 14,1995 Minutes Emblic Hearing The meeting was called to order by Bob Annour at 2:05 p.m Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the request for a site coverage variance with the conditions ass ted in the Staff memo. The motion was seconded by Greg Moffet. All voted unanimously in favor, with a vote of 6-1 2. A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the Vail Valley Medical Center top a mobile catheter lab/trailer, located at 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E F, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant.' Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by an Feeney Planner- Randy Stoner Dan Feeney had cormnents on the Staff s conditions. To have the lab gone by 4pm might be harit to comply with, since a heavy patient load might cause a delay. A heavy patient load could lead to bringing the lab back a second time. Bob our asked if the lab would be brought in more than once per month. Dan Feeney stated yes; but no more than three times per month total. an Feeney said an exception must be made for running the generator during a power outage for patient safety. Bob Armour stated that the one year re-evaluation would be a review of how smoothly the operation was going. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes AugusI14,1995 2 p ppp- Randy Stouder strongly advised to keep the one year re-evaluation in the agreement. Greg Moffet reminded any Stouder that this procedure represented a three year investment. Mike Mollica mentioned Garton's Saloon was in a similar situation and had to reapply each year. He also agreed with Randy Stouder to re-evaluate the project after I year, not to revoke the permit, but only tot e and refine it. Kevin Deighan agreed with Staff because the CUP could affect the neighborhood. He wanted to re-evaluate it after I year. Pam Stenmark, manager of the Evergreen Lodge and representing the management and condo association, agreed with examining the impacts after I year. She agrees with the new lab location if heavily landscaped. Right now the south facing rooms do see an unlandscaped berm and are already faced with truck noise and views of the hospital's back side. Bob Armour asked if Pam was comfortable with the landscaping Option B. Pam said yes, if 2/3 of the plants are placed west of the Ambulance District Building. Greg Moffet thinks to avoid peak times, they should arrive prior to 9:00 p.m. and depart prior to 8-00 p.m. the following day. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes August 14,1995 Planning and EnvironmentaJ Commission Minutes August 14, 1 5 Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Ernie Bender la Russell Forrest Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes August 14, 1 5 Kevin Deighan said a more appealing plan doesn't constitute a hardshipL: John Perkins said because of the interior traffic flow there is not another way to design this addition. Bob Armour said given the Town's rules, there is not a hardship. Under the guidelines and codes we can't come up with a hardship. There exists a non-conforming; situation. lff�W lJill 11 JlJll JIM Ill OPIUM I Jill I Jill 4 Henry Pratt suggested converting the garage and building a new garage. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes .9 August 14, 1995 Bob Armour said he wants it on the Frontage Rd. to direct trucks where to go. Greg Moffet asked about the underground fuel tanks and if they are going to be double walled Larry Grafel said the trough would have double walled pipes. Andy Knudtsen said it might warrant a closer look at other resorts with Keystone being the more successful. Once that can be identified, the types of tenants can be identi . Bob Armour said the type of employees will drive design. Larry Grafel asked what, how much, and how it would be financed. He was concerned about the timing of the request. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes August 14,1995 MI I!