Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-0925 PEC11 A request for a Major SDD Amendment, to SDD allow for the conversion of 17 dwelling units to accommodation units at the Marriott located at 715 West Lionshead Circle/Marriott Mountain Resort/Lots 4, 7,C & D, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing. Applicant: Mary French for Marriott Mountain Resort Planner-- George Ruther 2. A request for a wall height variance to allow for the construction of an elevated parking deck at the Kreiselmeier Residence located at 2686 Davos Trail/Lot 5, Block C, Vail Ridge Subdivision. Applicant® Michael Smith for Chrishine Kreiselmeier Planner-- George Ruther Ki 4. A request for a Major SDD Amendment, to SDD No. 30, located at the Vail Athletic Club/ 352 East Meadow Drive and more specifically described as follows: a GRFA/crawl space staff interpretation - Randy Stouder West Star Bank ATM - George Rather Driver: George �W umt= Public Hearina 2:00 p.m. FA9veryone\pecV,mIice\092595 I MEMORAND MEMORANDUM 111111® CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Chapter 18.71 - Additional GRFA, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the request for additional GRFA based upon the following factors- A. aonsideration of Factors: Before acting on an application for additional GRFA, the Manning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use- 1 . Effect upon the existin to ooraov ve station drains e and existin structures. The proposed addition is located at the basement level of the building, under existing floor area. The addition will have minimal impact on the site, no vegetation will be removed, and neither drainage or grading on the property will be effected. The addition will match the existing building (materials and colors) and not appear out of placed 2. I act on a °scent ro ert(es. The proposed addition will have no impact on adjacent properties. 3 orrt fiance with the Town' zoning re uirertten and (ic le development standards. Section 1 8.71.020 (F) of the Town of Vail Zoning Code requires that any dwelling unit that proposes to use an additional 250 square feet of GRFA shall comply with the standards within the Design Review Guidelines. These standards include landscaping, undergrounding of utilities, paving of the driveway and general maintenance of the property. Upon inspection by staff, we find that this property is in compliance with the Town's zoning requirements and all applicable develo ent standards. Because a portion of this building is currently under construction, some areas of the site have been disturbed. When construction is complete, all site regrading and revegetation will be completed. B. Fin in s: The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting approval for Additional PA® 1 . That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would not negatively effect existing topography, vegetation, drainage and existing structures. MEMORANDUM Upon review of "Town of Vail files, it is unclear as to how the additional 15 dwelling units gait constructed. ore importantly, however, the Major SDD Amendment requested by the applicant brings the project into compliance with the originally approved SDD Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to convert seventeen dwelling units into accommodation through the removal of the existing kitchen facilities. Pursuant to Section 18.04.070, dwelling units are defined as, "Dwelling units mean any room or group of rooms in a two-family or multi-family building with kitchen facilities designed for or used by one family as an independent housekeeping unit. A dwelling unit in a multi-family building may include one attached accommodation unit no larger than one third of the total floor area of the dwelling unit." Additionally, pursuant to Section 18.04.030, accommodation unit are defined as, "Accommodation unit means any room or group of rooms i h ut kitchen facilities designed for or adapted to occupancy by guests and accessible from common corridors, walks, or balconies without passim through another accommodation unit or dwelling unit. Each accommodation unit shall be counted as one half (1/2) of dwelling unit for purposes of calculating allowable units per acre." Based upon the interpretation of the definitions identified above, the removal of the kitchen facilities from the seventeen dwelling units results in the creation of seventeen new accommodation units. I® SPECIAL DE IJ T T The following are the nine Special Development District review criteria to be utilized by the Planning and Environmental Commission when evaluating Special Development District proposals and /or amendments: A, Design compatibility and sensitivity tat the immediate environ e , neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building ei t, buffer zones, identity, e aracter, visual integrity orientation® The staff believes that the above indicated criteria is not applicable to the applicant's proposed Major SDD Amendment, since the conversion of the seventeen dwelling units will not result in any changes to the architectural design, scale, bulk, height, etc., of the existing building. B. Uses, activity and esi ty which provide a compatible, efficient a r l relationship it surrounding uses and activity. The stair is of the opinion that the applicant's request to convert seventeen dwelling units to accommodation units will result in a benefit enjoyed by both the F:\ everyone \pec \memos\maniott925 2 2® Skier /Tourist Concerns "Town 12 The ski area owner, the business community and the leaders should work together closely to make existing facilities and the Town function more efficiently. 3® Commercial 3.1 The hotel bed base should be preserved and used more efficently. 3.2 The Village and Lionshead areas are the best location for hotels to serve the future needs of the destination skiers. E. Identification an iti ation of natural and/or geologic hazards that ect the property on which the special evelo e t district is proposed. There are no natural and /or geologic hazards, or Mood plain that affect the Marriott Vail Mountain Resort property. F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality oft the community. The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's proposed Major SDD Amendment request. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and -site traffic circulation. The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's proposed Major SDD Amendment request. However, the Marriott Vail Mountain Resort has recently undergone significant interior and exterior improvements. The work that has been done has improved bath the vehicular and pedestrian traffic circulation on and o° the property. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open s ace in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. Again, the staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's proposed Major SDD Amendment request. I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout e development oft the special . development district. F \everyone\pec\m ®sue, flart.9zs X -305 X -224 -- X- 204 ---- X- 301- -- K- 209 - (HDBD) K- 501 -� X-300 3m The the requested ri c light and air, distribution of 1. That the applicant resubmit a site plan and wall section elevation to the Community Development Department more accurately depicting the proposed construction of new stair and landing. Additionally, the resubmitted cans shall illustrate a protective guardrail added to the top wall of the multi-tiered retaining all system. The design of the protective guard rail shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Vail Engineer. . That the applicant resubmit a landscape plan indicating the mitigation of the lost aspen trees. The revised landscape plan shall mitigate the loss of aspen trees at a 1;1 ratio. F: \everyone\pee\memo \kreise@m.925 4 0 3 2613 2603 4 2633 7 6 5 2643 2 j 3 9 2703 8 268 2693 2653 2602 8.2 4 2612 CORTINA 2642 24 2575 10 9 8 26 23 585 11 2692 2682 2672 2- 2605 jib 2702 20 21 2609 19 2635 2615 4 , 257 16 18 17 2655 2645 3 2 6 2,101 f 2696 10, 2567 10 11 12 11 2579 5 5 9 2617 2607 2597 2587 4 566 63 3 56 2647 2610 648 ROS4 2608 2586 2578 22 48 49 23 8 1 2499 49 2657 26 ATTACHMENT "Aet E L L4 0 T T 0 1 11 �9 e U', g d ®® ! S° WIT 3 i - g u t ltd e;9vla 6 FILL H ut4ll c ld-o" 1yp LDOV,5 Ties ®a� I°el ,&Vey ®®9 U H 11 �- _ I® L Lp. I Pt \% I alJ LL i = i `fj ll di j® oG ILI� °� '12tiF4 :!;r-- E t130v - TYPICAL WALL SECTION s28 =P lair T/ -IL P Inc k�L-, 0 11LY rl 6- F2 -T i -l® Ti L-i- R-t� i2(--A i! i 2 k O H L Y o ii i 14 H ATTACHMENT "C" 2 Ill. ZONING STATISTICS Lot Size: 10,716 square feet Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residential Allowed Exist Rro osed GRFA: 3,529 sq. ft. 2,343 q.ft. 3,753 sq..' Setbacks: Front: 20' 52' Front: 21' Sides: 15715' 20 °,23' Sides: 20°° 23° Rear: 15` 17° Rear: 17' Site Coverage. 0% or 2,143 sq. ft 15.1% or 1,614 sq.tL 22.6% or 2,425 sq, Landscaping: 60% or 6,430 sq. ft. 69.3% or 7,422 sq.fit. 61.7% or 6,611 sq:ft. Retaining wall Heights: 6 feet (max.) 6 feet max. 6 feet max. Parking: 4 spaces required 6 spaces 6 spaces *the applicant has applied to the CDRS for approval of one additional 250 sq.ft. GRFA allotment to ever this overage. IV. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of the Criteria and Findings for variances, contained in Section 18.62.060 of the Vail' Municipal Code, the Community evelo ent Department recommends denial of the requested site coverage variance based on the follow in factors: A. Consideration of Factors: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The complex roof system helps break up the mass of the building and de- emphasizes the fact that the applicant is proposing to max -out the structure with regard to the zoning parameters that control mass and bulk. However, staff believes that the proposed addition adds significant mass and bulk to the structure, making it less compatible with the surrounding, smaller structures. The addition is partily buried in the hillside and kept lower to the ground than the current height restrictions would allow. This reduces the mass and bulk of the structure when viewed from the west side, but does little to reduce the mass and bulk of the addition when viewed from the east an south (the most prominent elevations along public roads). The applicant feels that the project fits into the neighborhood better if it is kept low and spread out across the lot rather than utilizing the remaining RFA by going more vertical with the design. However, this necessitates the requested site coverage variance and reduces the ability to provide effective landscaping on the property. The existing landscaping is minimal 2 and the proposed additional material weld do little to buffer the bulk of the proposed addition. 2. The degree to is relief from the strict and literal interpretation an enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives oft is title without grant of special privilege. Staff traditionally supports site coverage variance requests when associated with the construction of enclosed parking. Staff reviewed the files of all the properties that directly surround the Aasland property. The review turned up two projects that have received variances. one was for setback encroachment associated with construction of a garage, and the other was a site coverage variance to allow for the construction of a two- car garage to replace a one -car garage. The applicant already has a three -car garage. . Staff believes that the current proposal has merit in that it reduces the potential height of the structure, however, staff also feels that the requested variance goes beyond what is necessary to allow the applicant to complete his project in a reasonable fashion. The proposed living room is overly large at 801 square feet, and contains 215 square feet of cantilevered space that contribute directly to site coverage. Staff believes that the applicant can easily reduce the footprint of the proposed addition without compromising function and marketability. If the applicant eliminated only the cantilevered portions of the living room, the variance request could be reduced to 67 square feet or 20.6 %. . Teeffect of the requested variance light and ir, distribution population, ns ation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff does not believe that there will be any negative impacts associated with this proposal regarding this criteria. B. The Plannin and nviron ental ®rnrnission shall make the fio110 ino n in s before orantin a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of peci I privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. . That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. K b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. C. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the PEC deny the requested variance. Granting the site coverage variance would not be materially injurious to properties in the vicinity, in fact the variance would allow the applicant to use more GRFA at a lower elevation, thus reducing the potential height of the structure. However, staff cannot find a hardship or extraordinary circumstance particular to this property that would justify the variance request. Thus, staff feels that approval of a site coverage variance, in this specific case, would be a grant of special privilege that could set a negative precedent for the neighborhood. Other lots in this portion of town are small and site coverage is usually the constraining factor that keeps structures in proper proportion to the lot size, If the PEO decides to approve the variance request, staff recommends that additional landscaping be required along the south and east sides of the addition and the east side of the existing structure to help reduce the mass and bulk of the south and east elevations. F:EVERYONE \PEC\ E o9 SLAND:925 4 • i I � • r i 4 {e Po p� i Ott LOFT PLAN i Ha (Jjeett446CF C �8 a�Jttlr'r't A ®e°�f L �3 P,6, r r�°/�7®. -- .._.._. _ _ r /,V CI- C $ r 200, Zs-rAiS Al 4 c t��SE /�lv C &�� E[fad® � E/� NOT Be Idam VAF01 _. 0// - C4 o,St pt oX1 ` r ®� U O.7® 2- - "'"'!' 4A1,0 ._.__ - - - —_ -_ __�_.11 ? �� T'/ Jftt - -- - _- ✓ _ > y R�� AID , f✓C Sopg vA141A/C - -- - ° - -- -_ --- -- -°-- s C i r9 7°- 5.- - -� ✓.� f�"� � f fd? P -�'�� f° � g��° f .� r �° f i�'- `7`C� __ 7"�f � _ 1��'°4'" .�i ld ty � C�° � .t� �' % /PU,frP D fc)�ff�or��f�r� 'CON f?- w _"Ii"ff _ cry i _ ��� d�t�� I Pew ��s�a �r- �� ®yo, EA/ re Ll POSE To. , Vl- 0 MUCH 5` ,9LLE P 7r .* T`H6771C`4Lc ro c -<Al lv -. iL,,L L- 3E /v % �?�I dr° l r���.. G'sb* P 1� tom`^.44r.S0= 6VZR a+IVP U° I'L- --? L G 2 b. amp f' I l Pd/�s 'i P✓ a- _ tVP �i�'eir 't VP r: ?r, S - t i :S ' � L!r? 4; 692 fir' 2(,--72 z-,,; /j j. <fic 34A' 7 F.� 7- __ _..... �s,. f'!� S . �t Y i..... -... _ �7 ii �.. tmM °d7 L' 6• ��i !�, 6i . ivy 4d ! 'L° C / c: A 4 Cie Z /k, 'Y f fi FwAMr _ _ 6)V � r/, —;r a I-C [ / r? 17� 7-0 f P d C,9 C j i.° ,fir CC- S% L`Aev - - -13�- J 6eck/,v —'�� t i � .S`f7,co ,®4�./? — - -- f� Fi= d —A-x- /V OAF, %T ';L a� C� _7" VEc� 0 --01? -- - - - -- L N -f, FEP. _ 7 voq v >D®rD �,c 01- °) Gj1Af- L a -- - - -- J3 L. 5®V O/ ,U 6 60 P 7-[-/ T61 �5 4/*—tVRPL SvqRauNoilil L OF " E /a, .J ,- F E p- d y P o &4f 14 Al d 7 % J2 r E OF 7-ff '//0 ULP,6 K A Ash i(1 ® ! �fiti ire 5 C� 0 4 17?6RE CF E 4��� WS iFf amt mot' E >. - -- 7—// l �E fa�J�� RE !luCff 41CSS �_rllEWO 11nOPoVA1 � �cEss��e c NEe�I ,O LTR 07.14E P— 771,:41V �d1ir "h�L' 7 °1�OSE o,c'c( LY Oc-Ll a I CrA- AIIt/�' A -E. Avi2 P- ItZLLY (DE J,S Aj 11® BACKGROUND On August 22, 1994, staff received approval to amend the text of Chapter 18.3 8, Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District ( S) and Chapter 16.36, Public Use District ( 11 ), of the Vail Municipal Code, and to create a new Chapter 16.33, Outdoor Recreation District (OR). The text amendments to the GNOS and IUD zone districts, and the creation oft the new OR zone district, were the first step in a two step process intended to insure that the uses allowed in these zone districts are consistent with their purpose statements, and that properties throughout Town, especially those with open space characteristics, are located in the appropriate zone district. An initial review revealed that approximately 60 properties ( fitly Town owned properties) were in need of rezoning for these reasons. It was always intended that immediately following the adoption of the above-mentioned text amendments, staff would analyze numerous properties throughout Town to determine whether or not the characteristics of each warrant their rezoning into, or out of, the open s ace zone districts previously mentioned. However, in conducting a detailed analysis of these properties, it was discovered that many of the rezonings contemplate y staff would not comply with the current Land Use Plan designations of the properties. It therefore became necessary to propose Land Use Plan designation changes on approximately 17 of the 60 properties being researched prior to proceeding with the aforementioned rezonings. In May of 1995, the Vail Town Council passe Resolution 13 which amended the Land Use Plan for these properties. Since that time, staff has reviewed the approximately 60 original rezonings and have both added and deleted properties from the original list. In reference to rezonings on private property, staff removed any private rezonings if requested by the property owner. 11. EXPLANATION OF ZONING The following is a brief description of the different open space zone districts involved in this proposed action (See Exhibit C for a more complete list of permitted and conditional uses). Na1uEaLA[ea_E!aaQjyajjQn_fNAa This district is intended to protect sensitive natural areas such as wetlands, riparian areas, wildlife habitat, and high hazard areas. The only permitted use in this district is nature preserve. Trails are allowed as a conditional use. This is the most restrictive zone district in the Town of Vail. outdoor Recreation G ); This District provides for passive recreation (recreation without structures, special fields, or equipment) as permitted use and active recreation as a conditional use. It is significantly more restrictive than the Agricultural Open Space District. Agricultural and en S aace A Sih This District allows for a wide variety of recreational activities and certain types of buildings. Depending on the size and buildable area of a parcel with this zoning, a single family unit may be allowed. General !!se fGl��o This district is intended to provide sites for public and quasi-public uses. The general use district is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi-public uses permitted in the district are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail. The permitted uses include passive 2 wetlands which makes it appropriate for the NAP District. rooerties rezone from uolex NAP to AP° This rezoning involves the un lotted land northeast of Pitkin .Greek Meadows (#9). It is one parcel which has two zoning designations. This property has no access and has been identified the Division of Wildlife as critical Bighorn Sheep winter range. ) Is the t preventing a convenient, wE relationship i land uses consistent it i i l objectives? The amendment does not prevent a convenient workable relationship with land uses consistent with municipal objectives. The proposed rezonin s are consistent with land use and municipal objectives for the fallowing reasons: 1) Downzonings to NAP will help protect sensitive natural resources in the Town of Vail. An objective of the lawn as stated in the Vail Land Use Plan, Comprehensive Open Lands Plan, and Environmental Strategic Plan is to protect environmental quality. ) Proposed zone changes to the OR District will allow the community to improve summer recreational opportunities which is'a goal of the Land Use Plan as stated on page 7 of the Plan. 3) Upzonings to the General Use District will allow existing buildings such as the Vail Mountain School or the Interfaith Chapel to better make improvements to their structures. These uses currently exceed site coverage. A GU zoning designation will allow the quality of the development to be better maintained and upgraded through an orderly planning process (See Land Use Goal 1. 3 on page 6). ) Does the rezoning provi r the growth of an orderly, viable community? This rezoning will help ensure that development does not occur where it is inappropriate because of natural constraints (e.g., hazards, wetlands, riparian areas, critical habitat). It will also allow for the orderly development of properties where growth is appropriate. At the same time it will ensure that passive and active recreational opportunities are maintained. ) Is the change consistent with the Land lan9 As Mentioned previously, the Town amended the Land Use Plan to help address inconsistencies between the Land Use Plan and proposed zoning changes. However, the Town has purchased several properties since the Land Use Plan was amended which have a Land Use Plan designation for residential uses. In lieu of changing the Land Use Plan again, staff closely reviewed the goals of the Land Use Plan and finds that the proposed rezonin s would be consistent with the Land Use Plans' goals. Several applicable goals include: Page : "The quality of the environment including air, water, and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows.' 4 Exhibit A: Property Legal Description and Property ovmer and Unique Features a sod Number Address of Property Assessors Parcel ConvirentsiNazards Plan Zoning Zoning L Number Designation Desi;gnon Designation 1 Lots 5, 6, 7, 3, 9, 10, 12, Vail Tom of Vail Natural Riparian Li3H ADS NAPD Meadows, Filing 2 2099-182-16-003 (5) Hazards: Roodplain 2099-182-16-004 (6) 2099-182-16-005 (7) 2099-182-16-010 (3) . 2099-182-16-009 (9) 2099-182-16-008 (10) 2099-182-16-006(12) 2 5175 Main Gore Drive South, Town of bail Wooded Area, Steep LDR ADS NAPD Vail Meadows Filing 1. A 2099-182-00-002 Hillsides. Hazards: parcel of land located in the Medium Severity Rockfall southwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of section 13, township 5 south, range 79 west of the 6th p.m. Bounded by lots 13,19,21, & 22, Vail Meadows Filing 1, the USFS, and Recreation Area 3 Bighorn P. A Parcel of land Tom of Vail Park Area and Strearn F ADS OR situated in the SE 1/4 of 2101-124-00-002 Tract. 6.43 acres. Section 12, T'5S, RBOW of the Hazards: Floodplain, Egos 6th P.M. Eagle County, Hazard Avalanche Zone Colorado. Recorded in book 268, page 347. Eagle County Records. 4 Tract C, Bighorn Townhouses Town of Vail .49 acres. Hazards: Red OS AOS OR Subdivision 2101-124-02-009 Hazard Avalanche Zone, Moderate Debris Flow. 5 Tract C, Bighorn Townhouses Town of Vail .45 acres. Hazards: Red OS AOS OR Subdivision 2101-124-02-009 Hazard Avalanche Zone and Moderate Debris R 6 Unplatted land South of Town of Vail Steep Area. Needed for OS ADS NAPD. Co side Townhomes. 2101- 124 -00- South Trail. #46 in ®LF. Bounded by Mountain 4.47 acres. Hazards: High Meadows bdivisi to the Rockfall and Red Hazard North, and by the USFS to the Avalanche Zone. South, East, and West Recorded in book 659, paw 32. Eagle County Records, 7 Unplatted land south of Forest Town of Vail Trail Easement, St B GenSubdivision. Boundedby 2101 - 123 -01 -001 hillside. 7.15 acres. Timber Fails Condominiums to Hazards: high Rockfall. the East, Unplatted Lznds to the North, d West, and the USFS to the South. Recorded in book 659, page 32. Eagle County Records. 3 Unplatted land South of Lots Town of Vail Steep Hillside. 2.43 acres. OS AOS NAPD 14, Block 2, Bighorn 1 st 2101- 111 -00 Hazards: High Debris Addition. Bounded by the Flow and Rockfall, Red USFS to the South. Recorded Hazard Avalanche Zone in book 659, page 32. Eagle County Records. Property Legal Description and Address of Propenty Owner and Unique Features d Land Use Current ` Number Property Assessors Parcel CommentsMazards Plan Zoning Zoning Number Designation Designation Designation 9 Unplatted land Northeast of Pitkin Creek Town of Vail Sensitive Bighorn CIS Duplex & NAPD Meadows. That portion of land currently 2101 -122 -00 -001 Sheep Winter Range. NAPD zoned Duplex, bounded by the 1 -70 5.13 acres. Hazards: corridor to the south, Pitkin Creek Medium Debris Flow. Meadows to the West. and USFS to the East, Recorded in book 339, page 807. Eagle County Records. 10 stream Tract directly West of Mtkin Town of Mail Stream tract .387 OS GU NAPD Creek Park. Recorded in book 300, 2101 -111 -00 -006 acres. Hazards: page 925. More particularly described as Floodplain follows: Beginning at the westerly most corner of Parcel A, thence along the southwesterly line of Parcel A and the northeasterly line of Bighorn Road S 46 °1925 "E, 142.75 ft.; thence departing the southwesterly line N 41'2232 "E, 47.84 ft. to a point on the northeasterly d southeasterly line of Parcel A; thence along the northeasterly and southeasterly line the following five courses: 1) N 48 °34'25" W, 66.6 ft. 2) N 42 "25'00" E, 17.25 ft. 3) N 61-47'30" E, 44.5 ft. 4) N 49. 1210" E 77.45 ft. 5) 58 °29'15" E, 55.33 ft. to a point on the southwesterly line of Interstate Highway No. 70; thence along the southwesterly line N 59'28'16" W, 59.01 ft.; thence departing the southwesterly line and along the northwesterly line of Parcel A S 56`50'09" W, 227.87 ft. to the Point of Beginning 11 Tract A, wore Creek Park Subdivision. Town of !Jail Stream tract dedicated OS GU NAPD 2101-111-04-008 to the Town by Vail plat. .48 acre. Hazards: Floodplain 12 Tract B. Gore Creek Park Subdivision Town of Vail .05 acre. Hazards: GU AGS NAPD 2101-11-04-009 Floodplain 13 Unplaited land East of Katsos Ranch. Town of Vail Wetlands Riparian MDMF and AGS NAPD Bounded on the North by Gore Creek 2101- 024 -00 -002 Area. Hazards: High GU and South by White River National 2101-024-00-003 Debris Flow, High Forest. Comprising of approximately 8 Rockfall, Snow acres. A parcel of land lying within the Avalanche Influence Southeast one - quarter of Section 2, Zone. . Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meriden . Recorded in book 284, pages 468, 470, 475. Eagle County Records. 14 Stream Tracts A,B,C,E,B F Vail Village Vail Associates Streams tracts. OS AGS NAPD 11th Filing 2101-023-04-001 (A) Hazards: Floodplain. 2101- 034 -05 -002 (B) 2101- 023- 04- 009(C) 2101-034-6-002 (E) 2101-034-04-016 (F) 15 Tract A, Vail Village 12th Filing Town of Vail Open Space/ Bighorn OS AOS NAPD 2101-023 -01 -004 Sheep Winter Range, Rockfall Ditch. Hazards: high Rockfall. 16 Tract B, Vail Village 12th Filing Vail Associates Hazards: High CIS A ®S NAPD 2101-034-05-002 Rockfall, 17 Lot 12, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filing Vail Mountain School Has Mountain School PSP AOS GU 2101-023-00-008 and Athletic Fields on Property. Hazards: High Severity Rockfall Property Legal Description and property owner Unique Features Land it Current props Zoning Ftum be Address of Property and Assessors and Comments/ Plan Zoning Designation Par l Number He arils Designation Designation 1 8 Tract B, Vail Village 13th Town of Vail Natural Riparian OS A O S NAP D Filing 2101- 034 -01 -001 Area. Booth Creek runs through it. 13.89 acres. Hazards: Floodplain, Moderate Debris Flow 19 Lot 11, Block 1, Vail Town of Vail Tennis Courts. 106 P A O S O R Village 13th Filing 2101- 034 -01 -012 acres. Booth Creek Park. Hazards: Bone. 20 Tract C, Vail Village 13th Town of Vail Open Space. 0S A O S NAP D Filing 2101- 033 -01 -015 Bighorn Sheep Winter Habitat. 93.35 acres. Hazards: high Debris Flow, High Rockfall. 21 Tract A, Vail Village 13th Town of Vail Natural Open Space. O S A O S O R Filing 2101-034 -03 -002 13.07 acres. Hazards: Medium Debris Flow. 22 Tract A, Vail Valley 4th Town of Vail Trailhead and natural O S G U NAP D Filing 2101- 102 -41 -006 Open Space. Hazards: High Debris Flow, High Rockfall, Snow Avalanche Influence Zone. 2 3 Vail Golf Course More Town of Vail 18 Hole Golf Course P A O S OR particularly described in including Driving deed book number 376, Range and Start page 985. January 19, Shack. Hazards: 1984. Avalanche, Debris Flow, Rockfall throughout. 24 Tract F, Vail Village 7th Town of Vail H rds: High Debris O S P /S NAP D Filing. That portion of 2101- 092 -08 -007 Flow, Medium land South of a line Rockfall and Snow drawn from the Avalanche Influence Southwest comer of Lot Zone. 1, Vail Village 71h Filing, to a point approx. 151.94 feet ,southwest from the Northwest comer of Lot 3, Vail Village 7th Filing. More particularly shown in Exhibit B. 25 Tract A and Lots 9, 10, & Town of Vail Hazard on -site. O S A O S NAP D 11, Vail Village 10th 2101- 081 -16 -004 Hazards: Medium Filing Rockfall, High Debris Flow, Red Hazard Avalanche Zone. 26 Tract F -2, Vail Village 5th Town of Vail Tennis Courts. V M P A O S O R Filing 2101- 0821 -36 -00 Hazards: None 27 Tract A, Vail Village ist Town of Vail Gore Creek Stream V M P ADS NAP D Filing 2101- 082 -27 -007 tract. Hazards: Floodplain. 28 Tract B, Vail Village 1st Town of Vail Gore Creek Stream V M P -To S O R Filing 2101- 082 -26 -001 tract. Hazards: Floodplain 29 Tract G, Vail Village 1st Town of Vail Mill Creek Park. V M P A O S O R Filing 2101- 082-39 -004 Hazard: Floodplain. 30 Tract H, A Town of Vail Mill Creek runs V M P A O S O R Resubdivision of Tract E, No Parcel through it. Hazards: Vail Village 5th Number Floodplain 31 Parcel B. West of Tnw ri of V.it Tait h—H ­4 Floodplain Property Proposed Legal Description and Property owner and Unique Features and Land Use Current Plumber Address of Property Assessors Parcel Comments/ Hazards Plan Zoning Zoning Number Designation Designation Designation 32 Tract I, Vail Village 1st Town of Vail Natural Riparian Area VMP AOS OR Filing 2101 - 032 -04 -004 2.791 acres. Hazards: Floodplain, 33 Tract H, Vail Village 1st Town of Vail Open Space /Courtyard VMP NAPD OR Filing 2101- 0 82 -13 -002 Willow Park, .44 acres. Hazards: None. 34 Unplatted /Mountain Sell Town of Vail and US Hazards: Moderate PSP ACS GU Site, located east of West debris flow, medium center line of Middle 2101- 064 -00 -001 (US rock fall. Creek. Sounded by West) USFS to the north, 1 -70 2101- 064 -00 -005 ROW to the south, and (ABC School) Parcel B, Spraddle 2101 - 064 -00 -006 Creek Subdivision to the (Learning Tree) east. 35 Unplatted /Mountain Bell Town of Vail Hazards: Moderate OS ACS NAPD Site, located west of No Parcel Number debris flow, medium center line of fiddle rock fall. Creek. Bounded by USFS to the north, 1-70 ROW to the south, Tract C, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision and Solar Vail to the west. 36 Vail Interfaith Chapel Vail Religious Vail Interfaith Chapel PSP AOS GU Property Vail Village Foundation Structure covers Filing 1. Recorded in 2101- 071 -09 -001 parcel. .27 acres. book 231, page 94. Hazards: None. Eagle County Records. 37 Tract J, Vail Village First Town of Vail Property behind PSP AOS GU Filing 2101- 071-09 -002 Chapel has parking and Gore Creek Floodplain. Hazards: Floodplain 33 Tract B, Vail Lionshead Town of Vail Stream tract/ Riparian OS AOS NAPD 2nd Filing No Parcel Number area. 10.21 acres. Hazards: Floodplain. NAPD 39 Lot 20A, Block 7, Vail Town of Vail Wetlands on property. OS P/S Village 1st Filing. 2101- 071 -13 -009 Hazards: Floodplain 274 Beaver Dam Road NAPD 40 Tract C, Vail Lionshead Town of Vail fiddle Creek Stream OS AOS 2nd Filing 2101 - 064 -07 -011 tract. Hazards: Floodplain 41 Tract A, Vail Lionshead Town of Vail fiddle Creek Stream OS AOS NAPD 2nd Filing 2101- 064-07-022 tract. Hazards: Floodplain 42 Tract A, Vail Village 2nd Town of Vail fiddle Creek Streams OS AOS OR Filing 2101- 064 - 07-011 tract. Pedestrian Trail. Hazards: Floodplain 43 Tract B, Vail Lionshead Town of Vail Stream tract. Hazards: OS AOS NAPD 1st Filing Exempt Floodplain. 44 Traot S, Vail Lionshead Town of Vail Has path on both sides OS AOS NAPD 3rd Filing Exempt of bridge. Hazards: Floodplain owner w and Floodplain. :3 v • r' e aroma an ®rrr tst Plan Zoning Zoning Number Hazards Designation Designation Designation 45 Unplatted parcel of land, Town of Mail Cat Track may be GS AOS OR West of Lot 15, Vail Village 2101- 072 -00 -001 proposed on this 6th Filing. Bounded on the parcel. Hazards: South by USFS, on the None North by Tract C, Vail Village 2nd Filing and Sewer Plant, and the Fast by Glen Lyon Subdivision. Recorded in book 272, page 663. Eagle County Records. 46 Tract C, Vail Potato Patch Town of Vail Tot -lot & school. ®S AOS OR Subdivision 2101- 063 -02 -004 School would dike to create a play field west of the bldg.. Hazards medium rock fall. 47 Tract A, Vail Potato Patch Vail Associates Steep hillside. OS AOS OR Subdivision 2101- 063 -01 -016 Hazards: Medium Rockfall. 46 Tract D, Vail Potato Patch Vail Associates Steep hillside. Could ®S AOS NAPD Subdivision 2101- 063 -01 -033 make a good Trailhead. Hazards: None. 49 Unplatted Tract North of Town of Vail Steep Hillside. 0S AS NAPD Lots A -1, A -2, A -3. 2101- 014 -00 -005 Parchased from Abe Lionsridge 1 st Filing. Shapiro. Hazards: Recorded in book 253, High Debris Flow, pages 0160, 0161. Eagle high Rockfall. County Records. 50 Tract A, Lionsridge 3rd Town of Vail Wooded Hillside. 0S AOS NAPD Filing 2103- 122-05 -001 Hazards: High Rockfall 51 Upper bench of Donovan Town of Vail Detached from P AOS OR Park bounded by 2103 - 123 -00 -011 Donovan Park. Matterhorn Circle Drive to Hazards: None the North, Matterhorn Village to the West, Glen Lyon Subdivision to the East and USFS to the South. Recorded in book 299, page 222. Eagle County Records. 52 Lot 1, Vail Village West, Town of Vail Proposed Dike path. ®S AOS OR Filing 2 2103- 123 -06 -031 Hazards: Floodplain 53 Lot 40, Buffer Creek Town of Vail Buffer Creek Park. P AOS OR Subdivision 2103- 123 -02 -024 Hazards: Floodplain. 54 Stephens Park. Recorded Town of Vail Now an active P NAPD OR in book 650, page 849. Exempt recreation park. Eagle County Records. Hazards: High Debris Fl Flow, Medium R Floodplain. :3 v • L.1 UNPLATTED t t.<. c.:r.rn a q" a.r.,si .. 5. .. w.B dam. b�. a^!. ..a�c.M �..E ®-ew � e. a$ oS.e;.° .r `k.e.a .w. •^.1..s! t n 0 9 ' b r •�i�����Nl'k?ly�� ����p 4 � � ; �� * � ".S 1'% ��' rya ' 33� { X � q r�lS W W � NMI' i d M j' v 3 i fj; t E -hibi$ OPEN SPACE ZONE DISTRICTS Natural Area Outdoor Recreation Agriculture Open Space General Use Preservation Permitted Mature Preserve A) Passive outdoor A) Single family residential A) Passive outdoor recreation Uses recreation dwellings and open space B) Mature preserve D) Plant and tree nurseries B) Pedestrian and bike paths C) Bicycle paths and and raising fields row, and pedestrian walkways tree crops, D) Interpretive nature C) Public parks, recreation walks areas, and open spaces. Conditional A) Equestrian Trails A) Public parks and A) Any use within public A) Public theaters, meeting Uses B) Paved and Unpaved active public outdoor parks, recreation areas, and rooms, convention facilities Trails recreation areas and open spaces which involves R) Public parking facilities C) Interpretive nature uses excluding assembly of more than 200 C) Public transportation walk buildings. people together in a building terminals D) Picnic tables and D) Equestrian trails or group of buildings D) Public utilities installation informal seating C) Ski lifts, tows, runs l3) Public and private including transmisssion lines E) Parking when used in ) Cemetaries schools E) Water and sewage conjunction with a E) Well water C) Churches, rectories, and treatment plants permitted or conditional treatment facilities related structures F) Public and quasi public use D) Private golf, tennis, indoor community facility F) Other uses customarily swimming and riding clubs O) Public building and incidental to permitted or E) Semi- public and grounds conditional uses institutional uses such as H) Public and private schools convents and religious I) Public and private parks and retreats active outdoor recreation F) Ski lifts & tows areas, facilities, and uses O) Cemetanes J) Golf Courses H) Low power radio facilities K. Ski lifts, tows, arid runs 1) Well water treatment L) Churches facility ) Hospitals, medical and dental facilities, rehabilitation centers, clinical pharmacy, and ambulance facilities N) Equestrian trails O) Public tourist/ guest service related facilities P) Plant and tree nurseries O) Major Arcade ) Helipad S) Type III EHU T) Type IV EHU U) Seasonal structures V) Accessory uses to a parking structure