HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-0925 PEC11
A request for a Major SDD Amendment, to SDD allow for the conversion of 17
dwelling units to accommodation units at the Marriott located at 715 West Lionshead
Circle/Marriott Mountain Resort/Lots 4, 7,C & D, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Mary French for Marriott Mountain Resort
Planner-- George Ruther
2. A request for a wall height variance to allow for the construction of an elevated parking
deck at the Kreiselmeier Residence located at 2686 Davos Trail/Lot 5, Block C, Vail
Ridge Subdivision.
Applicant® Michael Smith for Chrishine Kreiselmeier
Planner-- George Ruther
Ki
4.
A request for a Major SDD Amendment, to SDD No. 30, located at the Vail Athletic Club/
352 East Meadow Drive and more specifically described as follows:
a
GRFA/crawl space staff interpretation - Randy Stouder
West Star Bank ATM - George Rather
Driver: George
�W
umt=
Public Hearina 2:00 p.m.
FA9veryone\pecV,mIice\092595
I
MEMORAND
MEMORANDUM
111111® CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Chapter 18.71 - Additional GRFA, the Community Development Department
recommends approval of the request for additional GRFA based upon the following factors-
A. aonsideration of Factors:
Before acting on an application for additional GRFA, the Manning and Environmental
Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use-
1 . Effect upon the existin to ooraov ve station drains e and existin
structures.
The proposed addition is located at the basement level of the building,
under existing floor area. The addition will have minimal impact on the
site, no vegetation will be removed, and neither drainage or grading on the
property will be effected. The addition will match the existing building
(materials and colors) and not appear out of placed
2. I act on a °scent ro ert(es.
The proposed addition will have no impact on adjacent properties.
3 orrt fiance with the Town' zoning re uirertten and (ic le
development standards.
Section 1 8.71.020 (F) of the Town of Vail Zoning Code requires that any
dwelling unit that proposes to use an additional 250 square feet of GRFA
shall comply with the standards within the Design Review Guidelines.
These standards include landscaping, undergrounding of utilities, paving
of the driveway and general maintenance of the property.
Upon inspection by staff, we find that this property is in compliance with
the Town's zoning requirements and all applicable develo ent standards.
Because a portion of this building is currently under construction, some
areas of the site have been disturbed. When construction is complete, all
site regrading and revegetation will be completed.
B. Fin in s:
The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before
granting approval for Additional PA®
1 . That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would not negatively
effect existing topography, vegetation, drainage and existing structures.
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of "Town of Vail files, it is unclear as to how the additional 15 dwelling units gait
constructed. ore importantly, however, the Major SDD Amendment requested by the applicant
brings the project into compliance with the originally approved SDD Ordinance.
The applicant is proposing to convert seventeen dwelling units into accommodation through the
removal of the existing kitchen facilities. Pursuant to Section 18.04.070, dwelling units are
defined as,
"Dwelling units mean any room or group of rooms in a two-family or multi-family building
with kitchen facilities designed for or used by one family as an independent housekeeping
unit. A dwelling unit in a multi-family building may include one attached accommodation
unit no larger than one third of the total floor area of the dwelling unit."
Additionally, pursuant to Section 18.04.030, accommodation unit are defined as,
"Accommodation unit means any room or group of rooms i h ut kitchen facilities
designed for or adapted to occupancy by guests and accessible from common corridors,
walks, or balconies without passim through another accommodation unit or dwelling unit.
Each accommodation unit shall be counted as one half (1/2) of dwelling unit for
purposes of calculating allowable units per acre."
Based upon the interpretation of the definitions identified above, the removal of the kitchen
facilities from the seventeen dwelling units results in the creation of seventeen new
accommodation units.
I® SPECIAL DE IJ T T
The following are the nine Special Development District review criteria to be utilized by the
Planning and Environmental Commission when evaluating Special Development District proposals
and /or amendments:
A, Design compatibility and sensitivity tat the immediate environ e ,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale,
bulk, building ei t, buffer zones, identity, e aracter, visual integrity
orientation®
The staff believes that the above indicated criteria is not applicable to the
applicant's proposed Major SDD Amendment, since the conversion of the
seventeen dwelling units will not result in any changes to the architectural design,
scale, bulk, height, etc., of the existing building.
B. Uses, activity and esi ty which provide a compatible, efficient a r l
relationship it surrounding uses and activity.
The stair is of the opinion that the applicant's request to convert seventeen
dwelling units to accommodation units will result in a benefit enjoyed by both the
F:\ everyone \pec \memos\maniott925 2
2® Skier /Tourist Concerns
"Town
12 The ski area owner, the business community and the
leaders should work together closely to make existing
facilities and the Town function more efficiently.
3® Commercial
3.1 The hotel bed base should be preserved and used more
efficently.
3.2 The Village and Lionshead areas are the best location for
hotels to serve the future needs of the destination skiers.
E. Identification an iti ation of natural and/or geologic hazards that ect
the property on which the special evelo e t district is proposed.
There are no natural and /or geologic hazards, or Mood plain that affect the
Marriott Vail Mountain Resort property.
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality oft the community.
The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment request.
G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing
on and -site traffic circulation.
The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment request. However, the Marriott Vail Mountain
Resort has recently undergone significant interior and exterior improvements. The
work that has been done has improved bath the vehicular and pedestrian traffic
circulation on and o° the property.
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open s ace in order to optimize
and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions.
Again, the staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment request.
I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional
and efficient relationship throughout e development oft the special .
development district.
F \everyone\pec\m ®sue, flart.9zs
X -305
X -224 --
X- 204 ----
X- 301- --
K- 209 -
(HDBD)
K- 501 -�
X-300
3m The the requested ri c light and air, distribution of
1. That the applicant resubmit a site plan and wall section elevation to the Community
Development Department more accurately depicting the proposed construction of new
stair and landing. Additionally, the resubmitted cans shall illustrate a protective guardrail
added to the top wall of the multi-tiered retaining all system. The design of the
protective guard rail shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Vail Engineer.
. That the applicant resubmit a landscape plan indicating the mitigation of the lost aspen
trees. The revised landscape plan shall mitigate the loss of aspen trees at a 1;1 ratio.
F: \everyone\pee\memo \kreise@m.925
4
0
3 2613 2603
4
2633
7
6
5
2643
2 j
3
9
2703
8 268
2693
2653
2602
8.2
4 2612
CORTINA
2642
24 2575
10 9
8
26
23 585
11
2692 2682
2672
2- 2605
jib
2702
20
21 2609
19
2635
2615
4 , 257
16
18
17 2655
2645
3 2 6
2,101
f
2696
10, 2567
10
11
12 11
2579
5 5
9
2617
2607
2597 2587
4
566
63
3 56
2647
2610
648
ROS4
2608 2586
2578 22 48
49
23
8
1
2499 49
2657
26
ATTACHMENT "Aet
E L L4 0 T T
0
1 11
�9 e U', g d ®® !
S° WIT
3
i
-
g u t ltd e;9vla 6 FILL
H ut4ll
c ld-o" 1yp LDOV,5 Ties
®a�
I°el ,&Vey
®®9
U H 11
�-
_
I®
L
Lp.
I Pt \% I alJ LL i
=
i
`fj
ll di j® oG ILI�
°�
'12tiF4 :!;r-- E t130v
-
TYPICAL WALL SECTION
s28 =P
lair T/ -IL P
Inc k�L-, 0 11LY rl 6- F2 -T i -l® Ti L-i- R-t� i2(--A i! i 2
k
O H L Y o ii
i
14 H
ATTACHMENT "C"
2
Ill. ZONING STATISTICS
Lot Size: 10,716 square feet
Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residential
Allowed Exist Rro osed
GRFA: 3,529 sq. ft. 2,343 q.ft. 3,753 sq..'
Setbacks:
Front: 20' 52' Front: 21'
Sides: 15715' 20 °,23' Sides: 20°° 23°
Rear: 15` 17° Rear: 17'
Site Coverage. 0% or 2,143 sq. ft 15.1% or 1,614 sq.tL 22.6% or 2,425 sq,
Landscaping: 60% or 6,430 sq. ft. 69.3% or 7,422 sq.fit. 61.7% or 6,611 sq:ft.
Retaining wall Heights: 6 feet (max.) 6 feet max. 6 feet max.
Parking: 4 spaces required 6 spaces 6 spaces
*the applicant has applied to the CDRS for approval of one additional 250 sq.ft. GRFA allotment to ever this overage.
IV. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of the Criteria and Findings for variances, contained in Section 18.62.060 of the Vail'
Municipal Code, the Community evelo ent Department recommends denial of the requested
site coverage variance based on the follow in factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
The complex roof system helps break up the mass of the building and de-
emphasizes the fact that the applicant is proposing to max -out the
structure with regard to the zoning parameters that control mass and bulk.
However, staff believes that the proposed addition adds significant mass
and bulk to the structure, making it less compatible with the surrounding,
smaller structures.
The addition is partily buried in the hillside and kept lower to the ground
than the current height restrictions would allow. This reduces the mass
and bulk of the structure when viewed from the west side, but does little to
reduce the mass and bulk of the addition when viewed from the east an
south (the most prominent elevations along public roads).
The applicant feels that the project fits into the neighborhood better if it is
kept low and spread out across the lot rather than utilizing the remaining
RFA by going more vertical with the design. However, this necessitates
the requested site coverage variance and reduces the ability to provide
effective landscaping on the property. The existing landscaping is minimal
2
and the proposed additional material weld do little to buffer the bulk of the
proposed addition.
2.
The degree to is relief from the strict and literal interpretation an
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives oft is title without grant of special privilege.
Staff traditionally supports site coverage variance requests when
associated with the construction of enclosed parking. Staff reviewed the
files of all the properties that directly surround the Aasland property. The
review turned up two projects that have received variances. one was for
setback encroachment associated with construction of a garage, and the
other was a site coverage variance to allow for the construction of a two-
car garage to replace a one -car garage. The applicant already has a
three -car garage. .
Staff believes that the current proposal has merit in that it reduces the
potential height of the structure, however, staff also feels that the
requested variance goes beyond what is necessary to allow the applicant
to complete his project in a reasonable fashion. The proposed living room
is overly large at 801 square feet, and contains 215 square feet of
cantilevered space that contribute directly to site coverage. Staff believes
that the applicant can easily reduce the footprint of the proposed addition
without compromising function and marketability. If the applicant
eliminated only the cantilevered portions of the living room, the variance
request could be reduced to 67 square feet or 20.6 %.
.
Teeffect of the requested variance light and ir, distribution
population, ns ation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
Staff does not believe that there will be any negative impacts associated
with this proposal regarding this criteria.
B. The Plannin and nviron ental ®rnrnission shall make the fio110 ino n in s
before
orantin a variance:
1.
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of peci I
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district,
2.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
K
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
C. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the PEC deny the requested variance. Granting the site coverage
variance would not be materially injurious to properties in the vicinity, in fact the variance would
allow the applicant to use more GRFA at a lower elevation, thus reducing the potential height of
the structure. However, staff cannot find a hardship or extraordinary circumstance particular to
this property that would justify the variance request. Thus, staff feels that approval of a site
coverage variance, in this specific case, would be a grant of special privilege that could set a
negative precedent for the neighborhood. Other lots in this portion of town are small and site
coverage is usually the constraining factor that keeps structures in proper proportion to the lot
size,
If the PEO decides to approve the variance request, staff recommends that additional
landscaping be required along the south and east sides of the addition and the east side of the
existing structure to help reduce the mass and bulk of the south and east elevations.
F:EVERYONE \PEC\ E o9 SLAND:925
4
•
i
I �
•
r
i
4
{e
Po
p�
i
Ott
LOFT PLAN
i
Ha
(Jjeett446CF C �8 a�Jttlr'r't A ®e°�f L �3 P,6, r r�°/�7®.
-- .._.._. _ _ r
/,V CI- C $
r 200,
Zs-rAiS Al
4 c t��SE /�lv C &�� E[fad® � E/�
NOT Be Idam VAF01 _. 0// - C4 o,St pt oX1 ` r ®� U
O.7® 2- - "'"'!' 4A1,0
._.__
- - - —_ -_ __�_.11 ? �� T'/ Jftt - -- - _- ✓ _ > y R�� AID , f✓C Sopg vA141A/C
- -- - ° - -- -_ --- -- -°-- s C i r9 7°- 5.- - -� ✓.� f�"� � f fd? P -�'�� f° � g��° f .� r �° f i�'- `7`C� __ 7"�f � _ 1��'°4'" .�i ld ty � C�° � .t� �'
% /PU,frP D fc)�ff�or��f�r�
'CON f?- w _"Ii"ff _
cry i _ ��� d�t�� I Pew ��s�a �r- �� ®yo,
EA/
re
Ll
POSE To. , Vl- 0 MUCH 5` ,9LLE P 7r .*
T`H6771C`4Lc ro c -<Al lv -.
iL,,L L- 3E /v % �?�I dr° l r���.. G'sb*
P 1� tom`^.44r.S0= 6VZR a+IVP U° I'L- --? L G
2 b. amp f' I l Pd/�s 'i P✓ a-
_ tVP �i�'eir 't VP r: ?r, S - t i :S ' � L!r? 4; 692 fir'
2(,--72 z-,,; /j j. <fic 34A' 7 F.� 7-
__ _..... �s,. f'!� S . �t Y i..... -... _ �7 ii �.. tmM °d7 L' 6• ��i !�, 6i . ivy 4d ! 'L° C / c: A 4 Cie Z /k, 'Y f fi FwAMr
_ _ 6)V � r/, —;r a I-C [ / r? 17� 7-0 f P d C,9 C j i.°
,fir CC- S%
L`Aev - - -13�- J 6eck/,v —'�� t i � .S`f7,co ,®4�./?
— - -- f� Fi= d —A-x- /V OAF, %T ';L a� C� _7" VEc� 0 --01?
-- - - - -- L N -f, FEP. _ 7 voq v >D®rD �,c 01- °) Gj1Af- L a -- - - --
J3 L. 5®V O/ ,U 6 60 P 7-[-/ T61 �5 4/*—tVRPL SvqRauNoilil L OF " E
/a, .J ,- F E p- d y P o &4f 14 Al
d 7 % J2 r E OF 7-ff '//0 ULP,6 K A Ash i(1 ® !
�fiti ire 5 C� 0 4 17?6RE
CF
E 4��� WS iFf amt mot' E >.
- -- 7—// l �E fa�J�� RE !luCff 41CSS �_rllEWO 11nOPoVA1 � �cEss��e
c
NEe�I ,O LTR 07.14E P— 771,:41V �d1ir "h�L' 7 °1�OSE o,c'c( LY Oc-Ll a
I CrA- AIIt/�' A -E. Avi2 P- ItZLLY (DE J,S Aj
11® BACKGROUND
On August 22, 1994, staff received approval to amend the text of Chapter 18.3 8, Greenbelt and
Natural Open Space District ( S) and Chapter 16.36, Public Use District ( 11 ), of the Vail
Municipal Code, and to create a new Chapter 16.33, Outdoor Recreation District (OR). The text
amendments to the GNOS and IUD zone districts, and the creation oft the new OR zone district,
were the first step in a two step process intended to insure that the uses allowed in these zone
districts are consistent with their purpose statements, and that properties throughout Town,
especially those with open space characteristics, are located in the appropriate zone district. An
initial review revealed that approximately 60 properties ( fitly Town owned properties) were in
need of rezoning for these reasons.
It was always intended that immediately following the adoption of the above-mentioned text
amendments, staff would analyze numerous properties throughout Town to determine whether or
not the characteristics of each warrant their rezoning into, or out of, the open s ace zone districts
previously mentioned. However, in conducting a detailed analysis of these properties, it was
discovered that many of the rezonings contemplate y staff would not comply with the current
Land Use Plan designations of the properties. It therefore became necessary to propose Land
Use Plan designation changes on approximately 17 of the 60 properties being researched prior to
proceeding with the aforementioned rezonings. In May of 1995, the Vail Town Council passe
Resolution 13 which amended the Land Use Plan for these properties. Since that time, staff
has reviewed the approximately 60 original rezonings and have both added and deleted
properties from the original list. In reference to rezonings on private property, staff removed any
private rezonings if requested by the property owner.
11. EXPLANATION OF ZONING
The following is a brief description of the different open space zone districts involved in this
proposed action (See Exhibit C for a more complete list of permitted and conditional uses).
Na1uEaLA[ea_E!aaQjyajjQn_fNAa This district is intended to protect sensitive natural
areas such as wetlands, riparian areas, wildlife habitat, and high hazard areas. The only
permitted use in this district is nature preserve. Trails are allowed as a conditional use.
This is the most restrictive zone district in the Town of Vail.
outdoor Recreation G ); This District provides for passive recreation (recreation without
structures, special fields, or equipment) as permitted use and active recreation as a
conditional use. It is significantly more restrictive than the Agricultural Open Space
District.
Agricultural and en S aace A Sih This District allows for a wide variety of recreational
activities and certain types of buildings. Depending on the size and buildable area of a
parcel with this zoning, a single family unit may be allowed.
General !!se fGl��o This district is intended to provide sites for public and quasi-public uses.
The general use district is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain
types of quasi-public uses permitted in the district are appropriately located and designed
to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail. The permitted uses include passive
2
wetlands which makes it appropriate for the NAP District.
rooerties rezone from uolex NAP to AP° This rezoning involves the un lotted
land northeast of Pitkin .Greek Meadows (#9). It is one parcel which has two zoning
designations. This property has no access and has been identified the Division of
Wildlife as critical Bighorn Sheep winter range.
) Is the t preventing a convenient, wE relationship i land uses
consistent it i i l objectives?
The amendment does not prevent a convenient workable relationship with land uses consistent
with municipal objectives. The proposed rezonin s are consistent with land use and municipal
objectives for the fallowing reasons:
1) Downzonings to NAP will help protect sensitive natural resources in the Town of Vail.
An objective of the lawn as stated in the Vail Land Use Plan, Comprehensive Open
Lands Plan, and Environmental Strategic Plan is to protect environmental quality.
) Proposed zone changes to the OR District will allow the community to improve summer
recreational opportunities which is'a goal of the Land Use Plan as stated on page 7 of the
Plan.
3) Upzonings to the General Use District will allow existing buildings such as the Vail
Mountain School or the Interfaith Chapel to better make improvements to their structures.
These uses currently exceed site coverage. A GU zoning designation will allow the
quality of the development to be better maintained and upgraded through an orderly
planning process (See Land Use Goal 1. 3 on page 6).
) Does the rezoning provi r the growth of an orderly, viable community?
This rezoning will help ensure that development does not occur where it is inappropriate because
of natural constraints (e.g., hazards, wetlands, riparian areas, critical habitat). It will also allow
for the orderly development of properties where growth is appropriate. At the same time it will
ensure that passive and active recreational opportunities are maintained.
) Is the change consistent with the Land lan9
As Mentioned previously, the Town amended the Land Use Plan to help address inconsistencies
between the Land Use Plan and proposed zoning changes. However, the Town has purchased
several properties since the Land Use Plan was amended which have a Land Use Plan
designation for residential uses. In lieu of changing the Land Use Plan again, staff closely
reviewed the goals of the Land Use Plan and finds that the proposed rezonin s would be
consistent with the Land Use Plans' goals. Several applicable goals include:
Page : "The quality of the environment including air, water, and other natural resources
should be protected as the Town grows.'
4
Exhibit A:
Property
Legal Description and
Property ovmer and
Unique Features a
sod
Number
Address of Property
Assessors Parcel
ConvirentsiNazards
Plan Zoning Zoning
L
Number
Designation Desi;gnon Designation
1
Lots 5, 6, 7, 3, 9, 10, 12, Vail
Tom of Vail
Natural Riparian
Li3H ADS NAPD
Meadows, Filing 2
2099-182-16-003 (5)
Hazards: Roodplain
2099-182-16-004 (6)
2099-182-16-005 (7)
2099-182-16-010 (3) .
2099-182-16-009 (9)
2099-182-16-008 (10)
2099-182-16-006(12)
2
5175 Main Gore Drive South,
Town of bail
Wooded Area, Steep
LDR ADS NAPD
Vail Meadows Filing 1. A
2099-182-00-002
Hillsides. Hazards:
parcel of land located in the
Medium Severity Rockfall
southwest 1/4 of the northwest
1/4 of section 13, township 5
south, range 79 west of the 6th
p.m. Bounded by lots
13,19,21, & 22, Vail Meadows
Filing 1, the USFS, and
Recreation Area
3
Bighorn P. A Parcel of land
Tom of Vail
Park Area and Strearn
F ADS OR
situated in the SE 1/4 of
2101-124-00-002
Tract. 6.43 acres.
Section 12, T'5S, RBOW of the
Hazards: Floodplain, Egos
6th P.M. Eagle County,
Hazard Avalanche Zone
Colorado. Recorded in book
268, page 347. Eagle County
Records.
4
Tract C, Bighorn Townhouses
Town of Vail
.49 acres. Hazards: Red
OS AOS OR
Subdivision
2101-124-02-009
Hazard Avalanche Zone,
Moderate Debris Flow.
5
Tract C, Bighorn Townhouses
Town of Vail
.45 acres. Hazards: Red
OS AOS OR
Subdivision
2101-124-02-009
Hazard Avalanche Zone
and Moderate Debris R
6
Unplatted land South of
Town of Vail
Steep Area. Needed for
OS ADS NAPD.
Co side Townhomes.
2101- 124 -00-
South Trail. #46 in ®LF.
Bounded by Mountain
4.47 acres. Hazards: High
Meadows bdivisi to the
Rockfall and Red Hazard
North, and by the USFS to the
Avalanche Zone.
South, East, and West
Recorded in book 659, paw
32. Eagle County Records,
7
Unplatted land south of Forest
Town of Vail
Trail Easement, St
B
GenSubdivision. Boundedby
2101 - 123 -01 -001
hillside. 7.15 acres.
Timber Fails Condominiums to
Hazards: high Rockfall.
the East, Unplatted Lznds to
the North, d West, and the
USFS to the South. Recorded
in book 659, page 32. Eagle
County Records.
3
Unplatted land South of Lots
Town of Vail
Steep Hillside. 2.43 acres.
OS AOS NAPD
14, Block 2, Bighorn 1 st
2101- 111 -00
Hazards: High Debris
Addition. Bounded by the
Flow and Rockfall, Red
USFS to the South. Recorded
Hazard Avalanche Zone
in book 659, page 32. Eagle
County Records.
Property
Legal Description and Address of
Propenty Owner and
Unique Features d
Land Use Current
` Number
Property
Assessors Parcel
CommentsMazards
Plan
Zoning Zoning
Number
Designation
Designation Designation
9
Unplatted land Northeast of Pitkin Creek
Town of Vail
Sensitive Bighorn
CIS Duplex & NAPD
Meadows. That portion of land currently
2101 -122 -00 -001
Sheep Winter Range.
NAPD
zoned Duplex, bounded by the 1 -70
5.13 acres. Hazards:
corridor to the south, Pitkin Creek
Medium Debris Flow.
Meadows to the West. and USFS to the
East, Recorded in book 339, page 807.
Eagle County Records.
10
stream Tract directly West of Mtkin
Town of Mail
Stream tract .387
OS GU NAPD
Creek Park. Recorded in book 300,
2101 -111 -00 -006
acres. Hazards:
page 925. More particularly described as
Floodplain
follows: Beginning at the westerly most
corner of Parcel A, thence along the
southwesterly line of Parcel A and the
northeasterly line of Bighorn Road S
46 °1925 "E, 142.75 ft.; thence departing
the southwesterly line N 41'2232 "E,
47.84 ft. to a point on the northeasterly
d southeasterly line of Parcel A;
thence along the northeasterly and
southeasterly line the following five
courses: 1) N 48 °34'25" W, 66.6 ft. 2) N
42 "25'00" E, 17.25 ft. 3) N 61-47'30" E,
44.5 ft. 4) N 49. 1210" E 77.45 ft. 5)
58 °29'15" E, 55.33 ft. to a point on the
southwesterly line of Interstate Highway
No. 70; thence along the southwesterly
line N 59'28'16" W, 59.01 ft.; thence
departing the southwesterly line and
along the northwesterly line of Parcel A S
56`50'09" W, 227.87 ft. to the Point of
Beginning
11
Tract A, wore Creek Park Subdivision.
Town of !Jail
Stream tract dedicated
OS GU NAPD
2101-111-04-008
to the Town by Vail
plat. .48 acre.
Hazards: Floodplain
12
Tract B. Gore Creek Park Subdivision
Town of Vail
.05 acre. Hazards:
GU AGS NAPD
2101-11-04-009
Floodplain
13
Unplaited land East of Katsos Ranch.
Town of Vail
Wetlands Riparian
MDMF and AGS NAPD
Bounded on the North by Gore Creek
2101- 024 -00 -002
Area. Hazards: High
GU
and South by White River National
2101-024-00-003
Debris Flow, High
Forest. Comprising of approximately 8
Rockfall, Snow
acres. A parcel of land lying within the
Avalanche Influence
Southeast one - quarter of Section 2,
Zone. .
Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the
Sixth Principal Meriden . Recorded in
book 284, pages 468, 470, 475. Eagle
County Records.
14
Stream Tracts A,B,C,E,B F Vail Village
Vail Associates
Streams tracts.
OS AGS NAPD
11th Filing
2101-023-04-001 (A)
Hazards: Floodplain.
2101- 034 -05 -002 (B)
2101- 023- 04- 009(C)
2101-034-6-002 (E)
2101-034-04-016 (F)
15
Tract A, Vail Village 12th Filing
Town of Vail
Open Space/ Bighorn
OS AOS NAPD
2101-023 -01 -004
Sheep Winter Range,
Rockfall Ditch.
Hazards: high
Rockfall.
16
Tract B, Vail Village 12th Filing
Vail Associates
Hazards: High
CIS A ®S NAPD
2101-034-05-002
Rockfall,
17
Lot 12, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filing
Vail Mountain School
Has Mountain School
PSP AOS GU
2101-023-00-008
and Athletic Fields on
Property. Hazards:
High Severity Rockfall
Property
Legal Description and
property owner
Unique Features
Land it
Current
props Zoning
Ftum be
Address of Property
and Assessors
and Comments/
Plan
Zoning
Designation
Par l Number
He arils
Designation
Designation
1 8
Tract B, Vail Village 13th
Town of Vail
Natural Riparian
OS
A O S
NAP D
Filing
2101- 034 -01 -001
Area. Booth Creek
runs through it.
13.89 acres.
Hazards: Floodplain,
Moderate Debris
Flow
19
Lot 11, Block 1, Vail
Town of Vail
Tennis Courts. 106
P
A O S
O R
Village 13th Filing
2101- 034 -01 -012
acres. Booth Creek
Park. Hazards:
Bone.
20
Tract C, Vail Village 13th
Town of Vail
Open Space.
0S
A O S
NAP D
Filing
2101- 033 -01 -015
Bighorn Sheep
Winter Habitat. 93.35
acres. Hazards: high
Debris Flow, High
Rockfall.
21
Tract A, Vail Village 13th
Town of Vail
Natural Open Space.
O S
A O S
O R
Filing
2101-034 -03 -002
13.07 acres.
Hazards: Medium
Debris Flow.
22
Tract A, Vail Valley 4th
Town of Vail
Trailhead and natural
O S
G U
NAP D
Filing
2101- 102 -41 -006
Open Space.
Hazards: High Debris
Flow, High Rockfall,
Snow Avalanche
Influence Zone.
2 3
Vail Golf Course More
Town of Vail
18 Hole Golf Course
P
A O S
OR
particularly described in
including Driving
deed book number 376,
Range and Start
page 985. January 19,
Shack. Hazards:
1984.
Avalanche, Debris
Flow, Rockfall
throughout.
24
Tract F, Vail Village 7th
Town of Vail
H rds: High Debris
O S
P /S
NAP D
Filing. That portion of
2101- 092 -08 -007
Flow, Medium
land South of a line
Rockfall and Snow
drawn from the
Avalanche Influence
Southwest comer of Lot
Zone.
1, Vail Village 71h Filing,
to a point approx. 151.94
feet ,southwest from the
Northwest comer of Lot
3, Vail Village 7th Filing.
More particularly shown
in Exhibit B.
25
Tract A and Lots 9, 10, &
Town of Vail
Hazard on -site.
O S
A O S
NAP D
11, Vail Village 10th
2101- 081 -16 -004
Hazards: Medium
Filing
Rockfall, High Debris
Flow, Red Hazard
Avalanche Zone.
26
Tract F -2, Vail Village 5th
Town of Vail
Tennis Courts.
V M P
A O S
O R
Filing
2101- 0821 -36 -00
Hazards: None
27
Tract A, Vail Village ist
Town of Vail
Gore Creek Stream
V M P
ADS
NAP D
Filing
2101- 082 -27 -007
tract. Hazards:
Floodplain.
28
Tract B, Vail Village 1st
Town of Vail
Gore Creek Stream
V M P
-To S
O R
Filing
2101- 082 -26 -001
tract. Hazards:
Floodplain
29
Tract G, Vail Village 1st
Town of Vail
Mill Creek Park.
V M P
A O S
O R
Filing
2101- 082-39 -004
Hazard: Floodplain.
30
Tract H, A
Town of Vail
Mill Creek runs
V M P
A O S
O R
Resubdivision of Tract E,
No Parcel
through it. Hazards:
Vail Village 5th
Number
Floodplain
31
Parcel B. West of
Tnw ri of V.it
Tait h—H 4
Floodplain
Property
Proposed
Legal Description and
Property owner and
Unique Features and
Land Use
Current
Plumber
Address of Property
Assessors Parcel
Comments/ Hazards
Plan
Zoning
Zoning
Number
Designation
Designation
Designation
32
Tract I, Vail Village 1st
Town of Vail
Natural Riparian Area
VMP
AOS
OR
Filing
2101 - 032 -04 -004
2.791 acres. Hazards:
Floodplain,
33
Tract H, Vail Village 1st
Town of Vail
Open Space /Courtyard
VMP
NAPD
OR
Filing
2101- 0 82 -13 -002
Willow Park, .44
acres. Hazards: None.
34
Unplatted /Mountain Sell
Town of Vail and US
Hazards: Moderate
PSP
ACS
GU
Site, located east of
West
debris flow, medium
center line of Middle
2101- 064 -00 -001 (US
rock fall.
Creek. Sounded by
West)
USFS to the north, 1 -70
2101- 064 -00 -005
ROW to the south, and
(ABC School)
Parcel B, Spraddle
2101 - 064 -00 -006
Creek Subdivision to the
(Learning Tree)
east.
35
Unplatted /Mountain Bell
Town of Vail
Hazards: Moderate
OS
ACS
NAPD
Site, located west of
No Parcel Number
debris flow, medium
center line of fiddle
rock fall.
Creek. Bounded by
USFS to the north, 1-70
ROW to the south, Tract
C, Vail Potato Patch
Subdivision and Solar
Vail to the west.
36
Vail Interfaith Chapel
Vail Religious
Vail Interfaith Chapel
PSP
AOS
GU
Property Vail Village
Foundation
Structure covers
Filing 1. Recorded in
2101- 071 -09 -001
parcel. .27 acres.
book 231, page 94.
Hazards: None.
Eagle County Records.
37
Tract J, Vail Village First
Town of Vail
Property behind
PSP
AOS
GU
Filing
2101- 071-09 -002
Chapel has parking
and Gore Creek
Floodplain. Hazards:
Floodplain
33
Tract B, Vail Lionshead
Town of Vail
Stream tract/ Riparian
OS
AOS
NAPD
2nd Filing
No Parcel Number
area. 10.21 acres.
Hazards: Floodplain.
NAPD
39
Lot 20A, Block 7, Vail
Town of Vail
Wetlands on property.
OS
P/S
Village 1st Filing.
2101- 071 -13 -009
Hazards: Floodplain
274 Beaver Dam Road
NAPD
40
Tract C, Vail Lionshead
Town of Vail
fiddle Creek Stream
OS
AOS
2nd Filing
2101 - 064 -07 -011
tract. Hazards:
Floodplain
41
Tract A, Vail Lionshead
Town of Vail
fiddle Creek Stream
OS
AOS
NAPD
2nd Filing
2101- 064-07-022
tract. Hazards:
Floodplain
42
Tract A, Vail Village 2nd
Town of Vail
fiddle Creek Streams
OS
AOS
OR
Filing
2101- 064 - 07-011
tract. Pedestrian Trail.
Hazards: Floodplain
43
Tract B, Vail Lionshead
Town of Vail
Stream tract. Hazards:
OS
AOS
NAPD
1st Filing
Exempt
Floodplain.
44
Traot S, Vail Lionshead
Town of Vail
Has path on both sides
OS
AOS
NAPD
3rd Filing
Exempt
of bridge. Hazards:
Floodplain
owner w and
Floodplain.
:3
v
•
r'
e aroma
an ®rrr tst
Plan Zoning Zoning
Number
Hazards
Designation Designation Designation
45
Unplatted parcel of land,
Town of Mail
Cat Track may be
GS AOS OR
West of Lot 15, Vail Village
2101- 072 -00 -001
proposed on this
6th Filing. Bounded on the
parcel. Hazards:
South by USFS, on the
None
North by Tract C, Vail
Village 2nd Filing and
Sewer Plant, and the Fast
by Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Recorded in book 272, page
663. Eagle County
Records.
46
Tract C, Vail Potato Patch
Town of Vail
Tot -lot & school.
®S AOS OR
Subdivision
2101- 063 -02 -004
School would dike to
create a play field
west of the bldg..
Hazards medium
rock fall.
47
Tract A, Vail Potato Patch
Vail Associates
Steep hillside.
OS AOS OR
Subdivision
2101- 063 -01 -016
Hazards: Medium
Rockfall.
46
Tract D, Vail Potato Patch
Vail Associates
Steep hillside. Could
®S AOS NAPD
Subdivision
2101- 063 -01 -033
make a good
Trailhead. Hazards:
None.
49
Unplatted Tract North of
Town of Vail
Steep Hillside.
0S AS NAPD
Lots A -1, A -2, A -3.
2101- 014 -00 -005
Parchased from Abe
Lionsridge 1 st Filing.
Shapiro. Hazards:
Recorded in book 253,
High Debris Flow,
pages 0160, 0161. Eagle
high Rockfall.
County Records.
50
Tract A, Lionsridge 3rd
Town of Vail
Wooded Hillside.
0S AOS NAPD
Filing
2103- 122-05 -001
Hazards: High
Rockfall
51
Upper bench of Donovan
Town of Vail
Detached from
P AOS OR
Park bounded by
2103 - 123 -00 -011
Donovan Park.
Matterhorn Circle Drive to
Hazards: None
the North, Matterhorn
Village to the West, Glen
Lyon Subdivision to the
East and USFS to the
South. Recorded in book
299, page 222. Eagle
County Records.
52
Lot 1, Vail Village West,
Town of Vail
Proposed Dike path.
®S AOS OR
Filing 2
2103- 123 -06 -031
Hazards: Floodplain
53
Lot 40, Buffer Creek
Town of Vail
Buffer Creek Park.
P AOS OR
Subdivision
2103- 123 -02 -024
Hazards:
Floodplain.
54
Stephens Park. Recorded
Town of Vail
Now an active
P NAPD OR
in book 650, page 849.
Exempt
recreation park.
Eagle County Records.
Hazards: High
Debris Fl
Flow,
Medium R
Floodplain.
:3
v
•
L.1
UNPLATTED
t t.<. c.:r.rn a q" a.r.,si .. 5. ..
w.B dam. b�. a^!. ..a�c.M �..E ®-ew � e. a$ oS.e;.° .r `k.e.a .w. •^.1..s!
t
n
0
9 '
b
r
•�i�����Nl'k?ly��
����p 4 �
� ; ��
* � ".S
1'% ��' rya
'
33�
{
X
�
q
r�lS
W
W
�
NMI'
i
d
M
j'
v
3
i
fj;
t
E -hibi$
OPEN SPACE ZONE DISTRICTS
Natural Area
Outdoor Recreation
Agriculture Open Space
General Use
Preservation
Permitted
Mature Preserve
A) Passive outdoor
A) Single family residential
A) Passive outdoor recreation
Uses
recreation
dwellings
and open space
B) Mature preserve
D) Plant and tree nurseries
B) Pedestrian and bike paths
C) Bicycle paths and
and raising fields row, and
pedestrian walkways
tree crops,
D) Interpretive nature
C) Public parks, recreation
walks
areas, and open spaces.
Conditional
A) Equestrian Trails
A) Public parks and
A) Any use within public
A) Public theaters, meeting
Uses
B) Paved and Unpaved
active public outdoor
parks, recreation areas, and
rooms, convention facilities
Trails
recreation areas and
open spaces which involves
R) Public parking facilities
C) Interpretive nature
uses excluding
assembly of more than 200
C) Public transportation
walk
buildings.
people together in a building
terminals
D) Picnic tables and
D) Equestrian trails
or group of buildings
D) Public utilities installation
informal seating
C) Ski lifts, tows, runs
l3) Public and private
including transmisssion lines
E) Parking when used in
) Cemetaries
schools
E) Water and sewage
conjunction with a
E) Well water
C) Churches, rectories, and
treatment plants
permitted or conditional
treatment facilities
related structures
F) Public and quasi public
use
D) Private golf, tennis,
indoor community facility
F) Other uses customarily
swimming and riding clubs
O) Public building and
incidental to permitted or
E) Semi- public and
grounds
conditional uses
institutional uses such as
H) Public and private schools
convents and religious
I) Public and private parks and
retreats
active outdoor recreation
F) Ski lifts & tows
areas, facilities, and uses
O) Cemetanes
J) Golf Courses
H) Low power radio facilities
K. Ski lifts, tows, arid runs
1) Well water treatment
L) Churches
facility
) Hospitals, medical and
dental facilities, rehabilitation
centers, clinical pharmacy,
and ambulance facilities
N) Equestrian trails
O) Public tourist/ guest service
related facilities
P) Plant and tree nurseries
O) Major Arcade
) Helipad
S) Type III EHU
T) Type IV EHU
U) Seasonal structures
V) Accessory uses to a
parking structure