Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-1009 PECM A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a permanent tent for the Vail Associates ski school and children's pavilion to be located at the Lionshead ski base, Tract D, Vail/Lionshead,; 1 st Filing. Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy Ptanner: Randy Stouder 2® A request for a density (GRFA) variance to allow for the conversion of attic space to G,RFA located at 3130 Booth Falls Court/Lot 6-A, Block 29 Vail Village 12th Filing. 5. 6. Applicant: Luis A. D'Agostino Plannec George Ruther 7.' A.,Tequest for a conditional use to allow the First Bank of Eagle County to locate a branch office al the Vail Gateway Building/1 2 Vail Road/Lot N, Block 5-1), Vail Village 1 st Filing', Applicant: Mountain Bancshares, Inc. Pkanne!r: Mike Mollica/Andy Knudtsen 5. A request for a minor CCI exterior alteration to allow for the addition of a bay window to the Lord Latigo Shop located in the A & D Building, 256 Gore Creek Drive/Lots A-D, Block Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: ar Florescue, represented by Cage Pierson Planner: Lauren Waterton . A request for a worksession for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a private club to be located on the 3rd and 4th floors of the Serranos Building located at 298 Hansen Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Gretta Parks, represented by len Flealan. Planner: Jim Curnutte 7. A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the temporary placement of a mobile MIRI lab to be located at the Vail galley Medical Center, 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots F, Vail Village Filing #2. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Dan Feeney® Planner: Randy Stouder . A request for a site coverage variance to allow for an addition to an existing primary/secondary dwelling located at 2527 Arosa Drive/Lot 3, Block D, Vail leas Schone Ffs #1. Applicant: Galen Aaslan Planner: Randy Stouder 9. A request for a density (C F ) variance to allow for the conversion of attic space to FA located at 3130 Booth Falls Court/Lot -A, dock 2, Vail Village 12th Filing® Applicant: Jeffrey & Eileen Cdhiffrin Planner'. Bandy Stouder 10. Council Reports 11. Approval of September 2, 1995 PEC Minutes. FAeverycne\pec\agendas \032595 2 MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM TO: Slaff Interpretations Notebook FROM: Shelly Mello ATE® September 22, 1992 (Revised ace er 13, 7 U J CT® Crawls ace with more than a 5-foot head height. .:::...:. A'• \, -..: . .......................... �............... �,.,:. i.:i• >:..; ?:. >:.:.a >........... } °..{;.�.;d.- :it,:�. e}}:...' >..>:,.. },; i�:,.;::.. �:,.. e?::«?' fim:;•}: {. }::i.:i.:: ;•:•::�:i«.�,:..,:. ..:... ..... Y: }••:tii:....... t ................. av•:•.::. x: : :iv::r:. ::.v..- .t ^:.v.� ?:::: .::. .....y....v::::.vv vvt: •v. a }.t v: ...v. teq},ava•... ::av:: :: vv:. ^:.•n :•: .v :•�. ........v:::.:. <aro•..na . v,,:::.:n:.:.............. L.v:.......: v...... ves•. v:'t{ivn \r .: .::.a :.':i .ass..• °'i� v :.. }::c :ia ri•:Cii ...... a.... .......... .:.,:. }v.:..:.b. v e:?{.av%a�+..�`39a.C- .': {... {v...snas...0. ^kiev:a'a ::v}i \;.i:.. ..va:`i:: ro}•? .' i::ni'.v+a..: ......... ..- :..:.v.aaea:..a.:: :.•..., °:. .._ :....:::::...., :.: ..::: - .c °:.:::: :.•.•::: ••, :::: • -. �..•a, •a:.y..a.,,,.. - :w..,,.:::.,:: :: .::.: , ........::.... .. a. ,.. .: .:: ...•..:: .: • ^ ::::.............. v::: .: .....::: ....: °: .... ..., .:,.,va. :,:. v. :.: °: •:. ... :.... ........ ...ro.,.,:ea ..... :.... :?1::nd. ,.v:.;.- •ma : :w, :.v.:::.a :.as e v. v. r..- n::.? ii},:!!:•;: a:::. A.? C} a }:::v- .avn..acvnv.,v..siA..4 +e: Y.; r.,v,Oh..ve v.. a.:..vv .•.A... .. s.e,. .x... :i.: ..q.: .. -. 1:,:.,v •.:,..v ::::: .nv ?.4v: :. ,..:: i'?. is :4 ?'i ::ti:iY. °vi'.n:1 °.aY...... a},. nwr:•:+-., riwTvv;. ae.+•:.. a.:.•.. w. uvwwiae•::: s+.•.. wuwv:..-. wmw.: vwmwvi.: avv.• u.» wv �m.•:. em+. eio° v�• hxe°+ i6a: ai: Ax.° 1tiE. �maeW. a° eiY. vna' ie' v+5N t8.: rivW3A' %•:eevad';w`.A'-s.ti•:{ia. saePs.. v.. avaa�S# xitiev: rv° 5rivvie•,' 4 d+irisfi4Wrv3ro.*'.ibai.Aao°{ro4;iro: tia°''w'h Upon review of the Town's current regulations on crawlsace head height, it is the staff's interpretation that any legal crawl space with more than a 5-foot head height, built prig to the 1990 change in FA regulations, can be convert to usable space. This interpretation is based on the new regulations which specified that if an area does not meefthe requirements for a cralsace, it is considered GRFA. Further, it is the staff's decision that if a crawls ace head height exceeds 5 feet, then the applicant may excavate the space further in order to meet building code requirements for usable space. Under no circumstances shall this policy be construed to allow development to exceed any current development standards authorized by Title 18 of the Mail Municipal Code (iae. F , setbacks, site coverage, etc. ). FROM WZOTW��,, I I ow, W g I SM Ilmll"m "Ill w� ME "" Ill . ZONING ANALYSIS The following zoning anallysis has been prepared for the P r of comparing t proposed redevelopment plan to the i Base/ Recreation zone district development st ndar and to the previously approved 19a5 development plan. Zoning: Sld Base/Recreation Lest Area: 49.83 acres Allowed/Required 1985 approved 1995 proposed by zoning MM!O� duel®on,ent pl Setbacks: As shown on the n - 5° n - 96' to lodge approved development s - n/a 73' to garage plan e - 45` s - n/a w -2 a e- ' -15' to garage 210' to lodge Site Coverage: As shown on the 30,156 sq. ft. 31,725 sq. ft. lodge approved development 32,254 sq. ft. of plan parking structure Landscaping: As shown on the N/A /A approved development plan Parking: As shown on the 136 spaces 164 spaces approved development (includes 6 (includes 14 plan residential spaces) residential spaces) *Height: For a flat or mansard roof - 35' 35, Unknown . roof area less than 35' 40 401'%. roof area less than 40' Dwelling Units: 1 dwelling unit per 3 acres or 6 dwelling units 6 dwelling units dwelling units * "GRFA: 3001. of the total gross 22-00% or 23.0% or square footage of the 14,462 sq. ft. 22,510 sq. ft. main building —Commercial area No limitation except retail & meeting 45,799 sq. ft.. 45,703 sq, ft. space, which is 15% & 5% respectively of the non- residential floor area. **Total floor area: As shown on the 65,150 sq. ft. 80,376 sq. ft. approved development plan The specific wording contained in the Ski Rase Recreation zone district states: "For a flat roof or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty -five feet. Up to sixty percent of the building (building coverage area) may be a built to a height of thirty -five feet or less. No more than forty percent of the building (building coverage area) may be higher than thirty -five feet, but not higher than forty feet. Towers, spires, cupolas, chimneys, flagpoles, and similar architectural features not useable as gross residential floor area may extend above the height limit a distance of not more than twenty -five percent of the height limit nor more than fifteen feet." For a more complete breakdown of the specific uses within the building and a comparison of the 1935 approved plan and the 1995 proposed plats, please see the next page® * ** Insufficient information has been provided to confirm building height at this tithe. Staff believes that the building exceeds the maximum building height allowance in the Ski Base/ Recreation zone district. e • Square footage lc lati rt and comparison r plan -Square Footage by Use 1985 199 Chan Retail space 4633 6,380 +38% Restaurant 1 165 9,756 -20% Ticketing/Ski school 3,097 3,252 + % Conference/ meeting rooms 2-005 3,180 +59% Employee lockers 7,996 5,764, -28% Residential: FA 14,462 22,51 +56% Common area 2,662 7,1 +167% Parking area 2,227 5,055 +127®/ Children's Ski School 5,663 0 N/A Private Club 0 3,807 / General Common Area- Mechanical/Storage 1,790 3,717 +108% Circulation 7,463 7,934 + 6% Restroos 7 1. 13 +144®/ Base Lodge Total ,1 80,376 % Managed parking structure 0 ±52,38Q /A Total Building Square Footage 65,150 139,756 +115% care Footage bv Floor First 288131 29,506 + 5% Second 20,691 24, +16% Third 13,190 18,311 +39% Fourth 3,138 6.507 +171 % TOTAL 5, + % square Foota e �rellin Unit Unit 1 2,883 4,514 +57% Unit 2 1,890 2,90 +54% Unit 3 2,638 4,948 +87% Unit 4 2,639 3,21 +72% Unit 5 2,556 3,562 +39% Unit 6 1,856 3e +81% Total 1,4 +56% Residential Common Area: +2.662 +7.108 +16% Total Residential Floor Area: 17,124 29,618 +73% • ® CRITERIA TQ BEUSED [ [ [ PR Since this is a worksession, the PEC will not be reviewing the roject for compliance with the required review criteria, however, staff felt that it would be helpful to include there as Attachment A, located at the end of this memorandum. V. DISCUSSIOEL ISSUES As mentioned previously, many elements of the Golden Peak redevelopment application are still being worked on by the applicant. The primary purpose of this worksession is to update the public and allow the Board members to provide direction to the applicant regarding issues related to the proposed project. The issues are as follows: A. Issues to be discussed at this worsession® 1 . Building and Site Design 2. Employee housing . Zoning code amendments . Draft Operational Management Plan B. Issues to be discussed at subsequent wor sessions: 1. Roadway improvements, soccer field to the roundabout 2. Parkin -- employee, public, managed 3. Neighborhood issues 4. Comprehensive sign program 5. Operational Management Plan A. Issues to be discussed this Worksession e uiCdina and Site Cesicn There are four major categories of review criteria which the PEC will use to evaluate the proposed development plan and zoning code text amendments. The four categories of review criteria are the zone change criteria, development plan standards and c.° eria, criteria fora proving the multi - family dwellings and conformance with the Vail Comprehensive Plan. The criteria are explained in more detail in Attachment A of the memorandum. Of the criteria found in Attachment A, the following are directly applicable to the PE 's and 's review of the architectural elements of this application; B. Selo rent flan standards and criteria - ( Building type in terms of: appropriateness to density, site relationship, and bulk. C. — 'eria f ®r a rovin the �rlti- farnil welEin s (Effect on the character of the area in which the proposed use is to e located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses® D. Conformance with The proposal will Jeff Winston, of Winston Associates, is assisting the staff in the building and site design review of this application. Jeff's written comments on this application are included -as Attachment B. Additionally, Attachment C contains the Written comments from Hans Woldrich, Vail DRB member, who is unable to attend today's meeting. Staff has identified the following discussion items related to building and site design. For reference, elevation drawings of the 1985 approved plan and the 1995 proposed plan may be found as Attachment D. The staff continues to have concerns with the linear mass of the partially underground 7 parking structure. Although the applicant has made great strides in attempting to conceal the north and west elevations of the parking structure, staff, believes that more work is necessary. We would strongly encourage the applicant to pursue additional berming along the north elevation of the structure, perhaps by incorporating a series of retaining walls, so that the entire north elevation of the parking structure can be concealed with earth and landscaping. We also believe that the same type of solution can be accommodated lop the northwest corner of the parking structure walla Additionally, we would recommend that the 2" tall railing, which is proposed along the top of the north elevation of the parking structure, be pulled well off the face of the garage. We would recommend to the applicant that they consult with the Town Building Inspectors, to arrive at a solution that not only meets all the Town's building codes, but is aesthetically pleasing. Overall, staff believes that the e mphasis of the new Golden Peak base lodge should be placed on its public uses, as opposed to its residential functions. The ur ose statement of the Ski Base/ Recreation zone district states that this district® "is intended to provide for the base facilities necessary to operate the ski mountain and to allow multi-family residential dwellings as a secondary use if certain criteria are et." While the residential portion of the building may be comprised of less overall square footage than the base facility operations, the character of the building is predominately residential. The residential decks overhang the public areas, increasing the shading of those areas, and creating a large r-than-necessary presence. in a rcrctur The existing 130 space, surface parking lot at the Golden Peak Ski Base is proposed to be replaced with a 150 space, managed parking structure. The new structure is proposed to be approximately 60,000 s. ft. in size and is substantially buried and surrounded on three sides with landscaping. The location of this structure, in relationship to Vail Valley Drive, has been established in large part due to the proposed size of the structure and the limitation of the "Exhibit 84 covenant line, imposed by the applicant's private covenants on the property. This line establishes the extent of building encroachment at the Golden Peak site and apparently, no building, even underground, can be located outside of this line. four foot high retaining wall, faced with stone and stucco, is located in front of the parking structure adjacent to the pedestrian sidewalks This wall establishes the northern boundary of the 20s wide landscaped planting area located directly in front of the parking structure. This planting area will be heavily landscaped to obscure as much of the parking structure as possible. The top of the landscape berm will be within " of the to parapet wall of the structure. The grade behind the parapet appears to be located within 1' of the grade of the top of the landscape berm. A 2" high pedestrian barrier guardrail is proposed to be located along the top of the structures parapet wall. The landscape berms are contained on their east and west sides by 12° high concrete wing walls, located at the openings to the parking structure. It is unclear if these walls will have a stone veneer facing. There are two openings to the parking structure. One accommodates the vehicular entrance and exit lanes and is located at the northwest side of the structure. The second I • opening to the structure is located at the northeast side and will be used as a pedestrian entrance. Roof Form • • Master The Vafll Village nmaximum r ,s on 9 this site® The Plan's goal is to maintain low scale buildings in the core and aloe g the mountain edge, with taller buildings along the northern periphery of the Village. It should be noted that this plan was adopted in 1990, after the 1995 development plan was approved for Golden Peak. All development after 1990, should follow the recommendations in the Vail Village Master Plan® Although this property is not in the Commercial Core I zone district, and therefore not required to be reviewed under the Vail Village Design Considerations, staff believes that there are many elements of the Design Considerations which are applicable to this property, such as mass and bulk, peestrinization, roof forms, transparency, etc. The shed dormers accentuate the flat roof in certain areas, particularly on the east side of the building. Decks and Balconies The building provides an deck and balcony areas, for both public and residential use. The south facing portion of the building provides an excellent opportunity for large decks for restaurant and public use. Staff recommends that the plaza area south of the restaurant be expanded. • C Q1 ®r While staff has not received a color board from the applicant, it would appear from the rendered drawings the predominant colors are earthtnew 11 Other n The comments listed below do not fit into any of the above listed subjects. Staff has these additional concerns that we felt should be addressed. Staff feels that the fence surrounding the condominium entrance has substantially been improved by creating much more transparent fence, as opposed to a soli -foot wall as originally submitted (See Attachment E for a detailed drawing of the fence). However, the fence appears to take up an excessive amount of the site area. Staff believes that more of the front of the building should be devoted to public areas and would recommend that this be modified. An undulating berm should be provided in front of the privacy fence, in order to reduce the fence's overall height. The island in the general skier drop -off zone should be eliminated and a new landscape island should be provided in the plaza in front of the building. This would break -up the massiveness of the plaza area, as well as provide a more logical drop -off area. 2. EmpLQyes H usino Vail Associates is not proposing to provide any new employee housing in conjunction with the olden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment. At the June 1, 1995 joint PEC/Town . Council worksession, staff posed the question of whether or not VA should provide employee housing in association with this redevelopment. If yes, where and how much? The majority of the PEC and Town Council members present (six PEC and four Town Council embers) felt that Vail Associates should address their employee housing impacts in some manner, and that it would be acceptable to construct the housing off -site or by deed restricting existing units. As indicated in a number of the goals and objectives of the Town's Master Pans, employee housing is a critical Town issue which should be addressed through the planning rocess. Previous, redevelopments within the Town of Vail have been required to provide employee housing to off -set some portion of the increased number of employees associated with the redevelopment. The majority of these redevelopment projects were carried out through the Special Development District process, where an applicant is obligated to show a public benefit with their redevelopment proposal. The Vail Town Council has recently directed staff to prepare regulations that would require new commercial development and /or redevelopment, in all zone districts in the Town, to provide housing to off -set the impacts on the housing market generated by the new employees related to the proposed development. In June of 1995, staff requested that Vail Associates provide a detailed breakdown of the number of loyees currently working at Golden Peak and the number anticipated to be wotking at Golden Peak after the proposed redevelopment. Additionally, we requested that this information be broken down by function ( i.e., lift operations, ski instructors, restaurant employees, Children's Center employees, tickets, sales, etc.). In response to this u t, Vail Associates provided a table which showed the approximate number of Vail Associates employees working out of Golden Peak on an "average" ski day, "peak" ski day and the anticipated number of peak period employees that will work out of Golden Peak in the future (see Attachment E )e That chart shows approximately 65 additional employees will be working out of Golden 1 Improve the pedestrian connection by implementing the Town's treetsca e Master Plan along Vail Valley Drive, from the Village Transportation Center to the Golden Peak Ski Base. In addition to the improvements ientifie Vail Associates, staff will take. comprehensive view of all improvements needed to address neighborhood concerns. These include roadway and e estrian improvements leading to the Golden Peak Ski Base; from Ford Park, the Village path, the Manor Vail side of Vail Valley Drive, connection to the Vista Bahn, Chalet Road, the soccer field, etca m arkin - loyeem Pulice ana ed - A discussion of how V.A. is proposing to address employee parkin needs, the `glass of public parking" and hove the 150® space parking structure will be managed, will occur at subsequent meetings. 3e Neiahborhood Issues - Staff recognizes the importance of the issues and concerns raised by residents in the neighboring areas® The issues, in outline form, are as follows: Chalet Drive - Should the road ROW be vacated and a pedestrian connection be created? Manor Vail sidewalk - Vail Associates has been requested to work with Manor Vail to resolve the unsafe crossing which currently exists at the western side of the Manor Vail property. Northwoo s/ ki Club Vail - The neighborhood has suggested certain improvements be made to improve the existing parking and pedestrian problems in this areas *Neighborhood traffic /circulation issues. . Cara rehensive Sian Proorarn - Staff recommends that a comprehensive signage program for the entire Golden Peak Ski Base be conceptually reviewed by the Prior to the final meeting. Final approval of the comprehensive sign program will be the purview of the DRB. 5. ana eent Plan - The operational management plan will be discussed in more detail at the October 23, 1995 PEC worksession, VI® STAFF RECOMMENDAI[ON Since this is a worksession, no formal staff recommendation will be made at this times Staff requests that the above- listed issues be discussed in detail, so the applicant and staff have clear direction on how to proceed with the proposed redevelopment plan. (:\every ®ne\pecVnemos \gpe 3 1 TMTLTMT October 6, 1995 TO: Jim Cumutte ww-u- ATTACHMENT TO: JIM CURN F / TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / 1 October 1995 FROM: HAT WOLDRICH i...� �� �. ; 2 SOUTH ELEVATION � A4.1 j r � Pterea, SaAarberg k dasoedatas ArchlteoU m — __-- ----- - - ---- _.- _- - - - - -_ _ wm a e m ___ _--------- --- --- p , ,oG ---- ----- - - - - -- L ------ -------- -- _-- - -___ --- ------ ------- __-- _ - -____ A I EAST ELEVATION W � e 41 Ida W I I I i I i I I i ---------------- -- -------- IM j e (DM OMIM- dZ3 i a �..� Ra ❑ ® ° I A., ------------ ---- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- — ,44.2 vaES °� ACC L r Ja • • ® �miL gb.id' Y L I 1 PARKING GARAGE NORTH ELEVATION rm m f° FM ® T - - - -� -i- —�- ��.--_ –_nom PARKING GARAGE WEST ELEVATION mom. L 011F :!"J i - . • • r -� L I�� .! i� 1I 11 no HIIKI r PBeeee, n to S 4 b A�acla�es ArsA.i&cc4� I ( A r.e. -aaa i I � � b s 1 I I b IBM IN IBM law t o� PBeeee, n to S Segeebae & A�acla�es ArsA.i&cc4� I ( A r.e. -aaa i I � � 1 I I t o� o� • • f- -i 7 PARKING GARAGE PLAN-LEVEL 194 ME M-e,W- Tc + 1-�& "r- r H e,-A7TO EagleBend Apartments i v total tic 9 54 is (5 one bedroom, 27 two bedroom, r r occupancy) a 179 beds (double Rata r 5 per month Vail Associates staff housing is sf or occupancy by first or second full-time, winter seasonal stsE After the second season staff are encouraged to find housing within the community. The rental rates ue very competitive wet other l i i 't have to deal with utility deposits t payments., The most our housing is the ease and . flexibility is s. We offer month to n long as the individual remains employed with Vail Associates, We gladly prorate rent if is founi ourselves o into the ut also try to or . commitment Vail Associates. i t o u r a The damage it is S200 per person. ne staff housing takes deposits all summer l see ° s is o ' c Before e in, they u t show a verification of employment from the hiring supervisor, gi t this is indeed "r r full-time r more) a® v 'A they must have the deposit and pay the first month's t® Most individuals send their deposit out early to pay one month's t to v im On occasion, a ti the individuals i little, if y, rent or deposit and we adjust their deduction schedule the course their employment, All leases are tied to continued full-time employment with Vail Associates. employee to (voluntarily or t, they have vacate it space, Also, if er transfers part-time position or drops below the ®° hours r uir they t usi All rent begins November &st, whether an individual is r not. Rent is taken out of paychecks the through payroll deductions. the rent is taken out each pay If e rent is current and the apartment clean undamaged, of o °t is returried after move-out. Q is kept for adrignistration, cleaning repairs. I e In addition o f ®! Associates eci c housing operations, have instrumental in the construction e na and Lake Creek Village, se two complexes account 1, 2, and 3 bedroom rat in the valley, Vail Associates invested S660,000 in the r and bought SI.25 million in bonds to help finanCe e Creek Village ro ii Associates recognizes that the long tem solution to any housing issues is iti housing its being built in thevalley. °l Associates has also started a second rt e guarantee program for staff who have been here three consecutive seasons or longer. This is a longer term solution to the usi challenges i e valley. dnoo j5 .3 ° d ° U ' A WdES d 77 SG, t%o JDO ATTACHMENT Chapter 18.39 GOLDEN A SKI BASURECREATION DISTRICT Sections: 18.39.010 Pur case® 18.39.030 Permitted uses® 18.39.050 Conditional uses® 18.39.070 Accessory eases. 18.39.075 Prohibited rases. 18.39.080 Location business activity. 18.39.090 Development plan required. 18.3 9.110 evelo ent plan - Contents. 18.39.120 Desi standards/criteria for evaluation. 18.39.130 Lot area® 18.39.150 Setbacks. 18.39.170 Height. 18.39.180 Density control. 18.39.190 Site coverage. 18. 39.210 Landscaping and site development. 18.39.230 Parking. 18.39.010 Purpose. The Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District is intended to provide for the base facilities necessary to operate the ski mountain and to allow multi-family residential dwellings as a secondary use if certain criteria are met. In addition, summer recreational uses and facilities are encouraged to achieve multi-seasonal use of some of the facilities and provide for efficient use of the facilities. (Ord.38 (1983) § 1.) 18.39 ®030 Permitted uses. A. The following uses shall be permitted within the nmin base lodge building in the ski base /recreation district: 1, Ski lockers/employee locker rooms. 2; Ski school and ski patrol facilities, 3. Lift ticket sales. 5. Ski repair, rental, sales and accessories, 6. Restaurant/bar/snack bar /candy sales. 8. Meeting rooms for owner use and community-oriented organizations. 9. Injury prevention and rehabilitation facilities for owners' use. courses, and eri eter property lines of the parcel. D. A title report, including schedule A and B, if applicable. E. Plans depicting existing conditions of the parcel (site plan, floor plans, elevation, etc.), if applicable. complete zoning analysis of existing and ro ase d development to include a square footage analysis of all proposed uses, parking spaces, etc. G. A site plan at a scale not smaller than " = 20', showing the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed it i s and structures, all principal site development features, vehicular and e estria circulation systems, - proposed contours and reli i a ry drainage plans. H. Preliminary building elevations, sections and oor plans at a scale not smaller than 1/8" = ", in sufficient eail to determine floor area, circulation, location of uses, and general scale and appearance of the r ose development. I° A vicinity la showing existing and proposed improvements i relation to all ,adjacent ro erties at a scale not smaller than I" = 50 "® J. Photo overlays and/or other acceptable visual techniques for demonstrating the visual impact of the proposed development on public and private property in the vicinity of the proposed development plan. K. An architectural or massing model at a scale sufficient to depict the proposed development in relationship to existing development on the site and on adjacent parcels. L. A preliminary landscape plan at a scale not smaller than e" ®2 ', showing existing landscape features to be retained and removed, proposed landscaping and other site development features such as recreation facilities, paths and trails, plazas, and walkways and water features® M. An environmental impact report in accordance with Chapter 1 ° ereo unless waived by section 1 °5 N. Any additional infer aion or material as deemed necessary by the Director of the Community Development Department. With the the exception of the model, four complete copies oft the above information shall be submitted at the time of the application. en a model is required, its all be submitted a minimum of two weeks prior tot the first formal review of the Planning and Environmental Commission. At the discretion of the Director of Community Development, reduced copies in ° " x 1 " format of all oft the above information and additional co ies for distribution to the Planning and viro ental Commission and Torun Council may be required. 1 8.39. 120 /Criteria for evaluation. , 1 8.39.130 Lot area. The minimum lot or site area shall be forty acres of site area, at bast one acre of which shall be buildable area. (rd 83 (1983) § 1.) 18.39.150 Setbacks. In the ski base /recreation district, front, side, rear, and stream setbacks shall be as on the approved development plan. (rd. 3 (1983) § 1.) 1 .39.170 Height. For a fiat or mansard roof, the height of the buildings all not exceed -five feet. For sloping roof, up to sixty percent of the building (building coverage ea) may be built to a height of thirty-five feet, or less. No more than forty percent of the building (building coverage area) may be higher than thirty-five feet, but not higher than forty feet. Towers, spires, cupolas, chimneys, flagpoles, and similar architectural features not useable as grass residential floor area may extend above the height limit a distance of not more than twenty-five percent of the height limit nor more than fifteen feet. (Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) 1 8 °39.1 80 Density Control, Total density shall not exceed one dwelling unit per eight acres of site areas (Ord. 3 (1983) § 1.) 18039.190 Site coverage. Site coverage shall be as shown on the approved development plan. (Ord. 3 (1983) § 1.) 1 8.39 °210 Landscaping and site development. (Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) 18.39.230 Parking Plan and ro ra Parking la and Management Program shall be as shown on and escrl in the approved evelo ent plan. fAeveryone\jim\skibase.wpd p ATTACHMENT Z GOLDEN 1A OPERATIONAL $. 'I PLAN L INTRODUCTION Vail Associates, Inc. ("VA") has filed an application to amend the Approved Development lan for the of en Peak Base Facility. The amendments include revisions to vehicular parking on the site, the esi n' an function of both public skier and Children's Center drop off, as well as alterations to employee parking, lift capacity, and ski base operations. In the course of the submittal, VA has made certain representations regarding the physical site plan and the operations of the portal. The 'Town of Vail Department of o uni ty Development has requested elaboration. This plan expands upon and supplements the application a , to the extent it is inconsistent with the application, supplants it. This Golden Peak Management Plan is intended to enhance the experiences of guests to Vail and of the residents of the Golden Peak neighborhood in a manner consistent with the goals and objectives of the agreement een the Town of Vail ("'T ") and Vail Associates to manage peak periods in this resort community. In effect, the measures proposed in this plan are means of managing or controlling the demands u on the Golden Peak portal and the impacts upon its surrounding infrastructure. The concepts and principles of the rd r To Manage Peak Periods Agreement (the "Agreement") between TOV and VA are therefore incorporated y reference into t is management plan. 2 reality that must be recognized in examining the creation of infrastructure and operational syste s for Golden Peak or Fail at large is that both the ski company and the reaer Vail community are engaged in the winter and summer resort business. For reasons beyond the -co lete control of the community the demands for and use of resort goods and services will always be subject to specific or isolated events such as the Christmas holiday or a world class competitive or cultural event. Events such as these will by necessity mean that Vail will experience surges or peaks of visitor use that may be mitigated, but will not be entirely overcome or eliminated y investment in hard assets. To the extent that such. high demand events tax the capacity of our systems and our collective patience, we must also acknowledge that these events, if well managed, are also what give us life, vitality, excitement and special appeal. It is the effort to "manage well's that leads tot the creation of this plan. In its application VA has proposed significant physical improvements t the Golden Peak portal. These include: - doubling the shier drop off zone capacities; - improving rop off flow and function; - giving location al primacy to public transits - structuring and landscaping private auto parking;, - improving lift access to balance portal use across the Village; an - improving base lodge facilities for the guest and local alike. 3' This major investment in hard assets satisfies to the highest degree possible the programmatic requirements of the Golden Peak project's planning professionals. The proposed management techniques which follow are meant to be flexible guidelines and dynamic tools which y be altered, revised, enhanced, or evert eliminated over time as needs require to "manage well "® And, while these techniques are described in terms of VA or T V responsibilities, it must be noted that others, the greater Vail community each and every Golden Peak neighbor, must likewise contribute, act responsibly and treat others equitably in managing or mitigating the impacts of use, growth and congestion during peak perms within our community. For their parts, pursuant tote Agreement, of VA and T V have immediate responsibilities to undertake growth ana e e t measures. Section (pages 11-16) of the Agreement outlines these immediate response ilities under Tier of the Plan® VA's obligations include measures which ig t mitigate impacts at Golden Peak such as providing bus passes to appropriate employees for use on the Town of Vail system, encouraging carpooling, and pursuing ark and Ride sites for employees. 's obligations, set forth in the Agreement, include controlli ea traffic and parking issues, productive management of traffic circulation and parking systems, creative allocation of us service, effective tilizatio of law enforcement personnel, and better distribution of skiers to different base area facilities® 5 The Assessment Committee, described in Section VI of the Agreement, is the entity charged with onitoring, evaluating, and refining the operations of the community anage ernt plan. For the purposes oft is Agreement, the Assessment Committee is likewise charged with this responsibility, but it is understood that for . these purposes the Assessment Committee may delegate its review function to the Vail Transportation Task Force or other- designee and shall include representatives of the affected of ern Peak neighborhood in the review process. The project components or elements which might be considered for tiara management techniques at Golden Peak include the following: (a) Managed Parking Structure; () Public Skier and Children's enter Drop-off Areas; (c) Employee Parking; () Mountain Operations; (e) Local and Community rogra s, such as EV , ( Ski Club Vail Activities, (g) Adult and Children's Ski School, (h) Loading, Delivery and Trash Removal; (r) Snow Management; °) Ticketing; etinng; am (k) Special Events® H. MANAGED A G STRUCTURE The Approved evelo ennt Plan of 1984 depicted 130 surface parking spaces, primarily located on the north side of Tract F along Vail Valley Drive for all varieties of users of this particular portal and 6 interior parking spaces fort the residential condominiums. The Children's Center plan of required 12 spaces. Taken together these total 148 spaces for drop off and arking. Presently the surface lot existing at Golden Peak holds approximately 150 automobiles or less depending onn the amount of snow storage on the lot and the efficiencies of car 6 storage. Of these 154 spaces roughly 18-20 are used y employees; Spraddle Creek Property ers reserve utilize 8 spaces; 4 spaces are used for Cross Country Ski Van pick-up and drop-off; and approximately 1 spaces are available for use by the skiing u lic for a fee. Parking requirements forte Ski Base /Recreation istrict are addressed in Section 1 . ®230 oft the Vail Ordinances which reads: "Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.52 and/or asspecified on the Approved Development Plan."(emphasis supplied) The language of is section permits and contemplates a parking function an design unique tot is district and its development plan. In response tot is unique environment the parking structure proposed in this last consists of 150 parking spaces located at € r below the street elevation and landscaped across the top to provide an aesthetic benefit tote development and the surrounding neighborhood. The fundamental concept of the organization and management of these parking spaces, the equivalent of a Tier I management technique, is to create a managed or reserved "right to ark" mechanism designed to control the availability and use of the spaces and hence cut down on indiscriminate traffic flows while providing for and ayin for the aesthetic benefits oft the landscaped structure. The mechanism formulated to provide this managed parking product to the public is a non-equit club or association of up to 500 members who would have the right to park in this structure for a fee® Two tiers of membership in the association are contemplated. The first tier would consist of up to 100 members who would have a right to park in computer controlled reiervations system. It is the intent of the applicant to initialla offer 50 first tier and 200 seconR tier memberships to the public. ParkinM III I I I I I � 1 11 11 IF I I I I =1 I III I Golden Peak Base Facility Project by the Town of Vail and sufficient subscriptioull to commence construction of the parking structure in the spring of 1996, but no later than spring of 1997® In the event that the necessary subscriptions are not forthcoming by spring 1996 to commence construction in 1996, the applicant would I build 30 surface parking spaces to �be used. on an interim basis until the end of ski entry to the structure. Access into the structure would be permitted upon I.D. identifying bearer presentation of oto the as a member and a confirmation of a reserved ar i space on the parking availability list® In the event that all parking spaces are not fully reserved and utilized by the club members, V, as operator oft the facility, reserves the right at any time oft the year to utilize unreserved spaces for other guests, members of the skiing u lic, employees or other persons who likewise must call and reserve a space less than 24® ours in advance. is short-notice use by non.-members would a permitted only on a daily basis by reservation. However, this managed operational feature would expand the available user groups and increase the utilization oft the structure in non- peak periods without adding appreciable, u wante ra ic. Further, if the utility of the structure can be maximized by offering additional memberships for sale, VA will o so after the first year of operation establishes typical occupancies. 111. SKIEER DROP OFF Skier drop off occurs presently on the east side oft the existing of err Peak structure and immediately to the north of e Children's Ce ter. . Existing conditions provide for 21 head-in s aces adjacent to the Children's Center and 10 parallel, or active parking spaces, in a loop drop-off area forte general public, totaling 31 spaces currently dedicated to all drop-off unctl The proposed plan nearly doubles this capacity by providing for 30 head-in s aces dedicated to Children's Center drop off and 29 spaces for general skier drop off north oft the proposed building, totaling 59 spaces forskier drop off at this portal. (® ) Tier L Management measures to be rr n in a sequential fashion concurrently with redevelopment include: 1® During the Christmas Peak period VA will staff the General Skier an Children's Center drop off zones with 4 to 6 people, split between the drop off zones as traffic needs demand, during peak arrival and a ure hours or approximately fro 8:30 to 10 a. m. and 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. These traffic managers will direct traffic, assist and expedite t e loading and unloading of passengers and equipment, encourage the timely and swift departure of vehicles, and enforce restrictions against unauthorized par in calling for the removal or towing of offending vehicles. 2® During the High Season period VA will staff the General Skier and Children's drop off zones with 2 to 4 people, split between the zones as traffic creeds demand during peak arrival and e a ure hours. 3® During non-peak periods and during evening or night hours the drop off zones would be staffed or managed upon the operational discretion of VA as may be needed to prevent congestion or vehicle stacking into Vail Valley Drive or the bus lark® During these Brio s and times, except for special events, VA will permit parking by the general public in the drop-off zone surface spaces consistent with the pr acticc and use of other ` VA parking lots such as North Day lots 0 4® Permanent, static, signage at the top of I e Cow Chute will be installed by TOV indicating that there is no public parking at of en Peak and that only it re 's Center and skier drop off is permitted. 5. In Section V (page 5 ) of the Agreement additional skier drop off zones have been identified as "pressing current tra s o ti and circulation needs". VA will therefore cooperate with the TOV in identifying additional skier drop off zones elsewhere in the town including Fnr ar the Main Parking truct re, Lionshead, and other locations which will be formalized and improved y the Town of Vail. Initially TOV will develop an implement a plan for general skier drop on the upper deck of e Transportation tenter utilizing existing physical improvements and facilities. 6. Upon the conclusion of each ea Period and ski season the Assessment Committee or its designee, willspecifically assess access to and egress from e mountain at Golden Peak, together with traffic and ro off impacts associated with the skier movements and will make recommendations for adjustments or improvements to the Tier I management techniques described above. .j Tier H. In the event that some or all of the 'Tier I management techniques above have been implemented and traffic congestion in the drop off zones still results in vehicle stacking into the street or bus lanes to a degree detrimental tote ordinary operation of the infrastructure, t o the following successive management efforts will be undertaken in the next succeeding ski season: 1® VA and /or T V will implement a ditional Tier I techniques which have not yet been employed or will enhance those Tier I techniques already in use according tot the recommendations of the Assessment Comml t ee 2® TOV, pursuant to its general obligations i the Agreement to implement reactive management efforts in coordination with VA to control traffic, will increase utilization of law enforcement personnel during peak periods in the management of traffic at Golden Peak (Section M. A. 2. a ®, page 13). 3® Based upon the impacts of traffic congestion and as transportation needs demand, T V will implement a electronic signs e program which would display messages can the towel arterials regarding trafflic conditions within the town parking garages, drop zone traffic status conditions and lift maze conditions at the base portals. T® EMPLOYEE PARKING Presently 18 to 20 VA employees park at Golden Peak aft the approximately 500 employees who are based them in Peak Periods. Another 25 to 30 spaces are seasonally leased by VA from third parties for employee parking. The remaining 0% of Golden Peak based employees park in public lots, use public transit, or, use other private parking spots. t 12 s) Tier 1. The following management techniques will be implemented sequentially upon redevelopment to mitigate employee transportation impacts and serve the needs oft the community's employees® 1® VA, together with T" V, will enter into negotiations with the Colorado Department of Transportation to secure, if possible, an employee park and ride intercept lot on Highway 6 in a Ie -Vai ® This lot would be used for VA and TOV employees to park their vehicles in Eagle- Vail and til° e established pu lic transportation routes to continue on to theirjob locations in Vail. In the event the CDOT site is not available or unsuitable, other sites will be located and secured fora park and ride Iots 2@ To the extent space availability exists during non -peak periods, V. A. will permit managed employee parking by reservation in e parking structure at Golden Peak. ® During Peak Periods VA employees will carpool tote soccer field lot pursuant to the Holiday Traffic and Parking Plan as managed and operated by TOV or alternatively as managed by VA® 4® During the Christmas peak period and, in fact, extending eyo it from December 24 until January 1 in any given year, VA will implement its Holiday Traffic and ar `rig Plan. During this period VA will provide free us tickets fart the Avon /Beaver Creek bus system to all staff. Parking in VA lots such as West Day Lot and North ay Lot, will be available for free to employees who carpool. Employees not carpooling ill be charged fee® 1 1® VA will extend its periods of mountain operations later into the ay (e. until 4: . ) to spread t the departure times of skiers from the mountain. 2. Employee passes will be restricted during the Christmas Peak an Presidents' weekend. '3® Improvements tote food and beverage offering at the basefacility restaurant, including a res ski and dinner offerings, will be , designed to attract the skiing lic and stagger the public's departu re from the portal. . VA will cooperate and coordinate with TOV and the Colorado Department of Transportation regarding the installation of signa a at base facilities, including of en Peak, advising e a in skiers of road conditions and, if conditions area verse, inviting or advising a i skiers to stay later in the village and draw out their departure times. ® Upon the conclusion of each eak Period and the ski season the Assessment Committee or its designee will assess mountain operation impacts and make recommendations foradjustments or improvements tot ier I management techniques described above. .) Tier 11. In the event that some or all of the Tier I management techniques have been implemented and congestion, still exists III the portal during peak periods, then the following successive management efforts will be undertaken in the next succeeding ski season or Peak Period: . VA and/or T V will implement itio al Tier I measures which have not yet been employed or will enhance those Tier I techniques already in use according tote recommendations of the Assessment Committee or its designee. 2. VA will continue to take measures to balance the unctionali and use of its portals, as well as on-mountain circulation. Capital expenditures will be made as needed to corntinualIy adjust this balance. DEVO/LOCAL AND COMMUNITY " ITV " is an abbreviation for the Vail Development Team, a Children's Ski School Program consisting of 300 children w is er specialized ski school classes to the children of locals and front range skiers. The high concentration of locals participating in the rogra results in inordinately high drop off impact on non- peak Saturdays which i ics peak conditions throughout t season® (A.) Tier I® Measures to be sequentially undertaken concurrently with redevelopment include: . The DEVO program cues not run during the Christmas Peak or over Presidents' Weekend. The program will continue to be limited in this fashion. 2. Arrivals for the DEVO program will be staggered in advance of the typical ski school or mountain opening times. DEVO arrival will be scheduled for 8:30 a. m., one -half hour prior to lift opening. ick up will likewise be scheduled earlier than regular mountain closure. 1 3® Drop off for DEVO will be formalized instructors in the Golden Peak skier drop zones to revs t stacking into the streets® ° VA will investigate splitting the DEVO program further and asi some portion of the program in Lionshead or staging it at other drop off zones. For example, moving the Freestyle Program, approximately 15% oft the 'DEVO skiers, to another drop off zone such as the TOV structure will be explored and implemented if alternate drop offs are created. Staging out of e Lionshead Teen Center will also be explored with , including the creation of short-term, inute, drop-off and is ®u parking spaces in the Lionshead Parking Structure. 5® DEVO race events will be moved in whole or in part to other local courses® 6® Upon the conclusion of each ski season the Assessment Committee or its designee will assess the impacts caused by the DEVO program and a e recommendations foradjustment or improvement tote Tier I techniques described above® °) Tier 11. In the event that some or all oft the Tier I techniques have been implemented and DEVO still adversely impacts portal congestion then the followingsuccessive management efforts will be undertaken in the next s° season or Peak Period: 1® DEVO will be relocated in . part or in whole to other portals, including down-valley portals accessing Beaver Creek Mountain. 2® DEVO and other such local programs will be terminated. 1 impact of i Club Vail on the use and icie cies of the portal and aka recommendations for alterations or enhancements to the plan. m) Tier H. Iii the event that some or all of the Tier I measures have been implemented and Itt Vail stilt poses logistical problems fort the optimized use of the portal, the recommendations of the Assessment 'Committee or its designee will be implemented. 1. Ski Club Vail will be terminated in ole or in a in its use oft the Golden Peak race courses and se facility. VIIL ADULT A ND CHILDREN'S SKI SCHOOLS The Golden Peak portal is somewhat unique in that it supports a full children's ski school, including urse , as well as the atilt ski school. Approximately 37,000 ski school students per season, or an average 264 per day, are serviced at this portal. The size and scope of ski school activities in the portal are naturally constrained by the size of the base area facilities® The Children's Ski School in particular is functionally limited y the building size and the ski yard available for introductory children's classes. (A.) Tier 1. Management measures to be undertaken in a sequential fashion concurrently with redevelopment include® ® Ski school classes will be coordinated with orning arrivals of other special user groups so that ski school classes will sequentially follow the arrival times of other groups and activities and spread out portal arrivals® 19 . VA will emphasize a "one stop shop" of essons and equipment, including overnight storage, which will reduce the need for arrival by private automobile as well as reduce dwell times of automobiles which do arrive for drop off. 3. VA will promote in its marketing materials the convenience of ublic transit which services the area. 4. VA will investigate the ® rarities for telephone or electronic preregistration in ski school in an effort to cut down the dwell times of automobiles dropping skiers off for ski school registration® 5. Upon the conclusion of each eak Period and e ski season, the Assessment Committee or its designee will assess congestion in the portal related to ski school activities and make recommendations foradjustments or improvements to the Tier I management techniques discussed above. (B.) 'Tier H. In the event that some or all of the Tier I management techniques have been implemented and congestion associated with the ski schools still results in crowding in the portal t err the following additional management steps will be sequentially implemented: 1. The recommendations for improvements or° adjustments e by the Assessment Committee or its designee will be instituted in the following season or Peak Period. 2. VA will make improvements to its Lionshead Ski School facilities upon the redevelopment of that portal taking pressure off of the Golden Peak portal. 0 . LOADING, TRASH REMOVAL The Golden ea se Facility requires the delivery of food and liquor for its restaurant erations and trash and recycling pick-up for all functions located at Golden Peak. Currently, food and liquor. delivery takes place daily between ®0 a. m. and 7:00 am. and again between . and The majority of food and liquor deliveries are first sorted at the Gondola Building in Lionshead, then delivered to Golden Peak by VA employees. Currently, there is no formal loading oc at Golden Peak is results in the need for two ( aily food and liquor delivery trips. In addition, t ere is a trash compactor at Golden Peak currently which results in the need for daily trash collection at 7:00 a. m.. Recycling pick-up is done by VA and occurs as needed concurrently with food and liquor drop-off. It is estimated that current delivery times will remain the same to avoid interference it skier traffic, though the addition of a formal loading area and storage may reduce the number of it delivery trips by VA from two (2) to c (). The addition of a trash compactor at Golden Pearshould reduce the frequency of fly trips required for trash i -u (A.) Tier 1. Measures to be undertaken concurrently with redevelopment include: 1. Delivery times will be managed so that no delivery or trash pick-up will occur during the hours of 8:30 a. m. to 10:30 a. m. and . to 5:00 p.m. e 2 2. The Assessment Committee will review and assess truck deliveries' and service at the conclusion of each ski season and make recommendations for alterations or improvements as necessary. .) Tier H. In the event that some or all of the above measures have been implemented and if loading, delivery and/or trash removal results in operational inefficiencies in the portal ten the following management techniques will be implemented in the next succeeding ski season: 1. The recommendations of the Assessment Committee will be implemented. 2. VA will endeavor to deliver larger loads directly to Golden Peak and store additional food and everage on site tins reducing the number of trips or will arrange night delivery to avoid traffic congestion. X. SNOW MANAGEMENT Snow management at olden Peak will be conducted in a manner similar to that in other VA portals. Snow storage zones have been depicted upon the revise snow storage map prepared and submitted with the Application. (A ®) 'Tier I® The following management efforts, will be undertaken wit respect to snow storage and management during the ski season, including peak and high season periods. 1® VA will by contract with it parties or through its own forces plow all areas of vehicular circulation as depicted on the Snow Management Plan by a. m. every morning upon a snowfall of or more inches. 2 2® VA, through its own feces, will remove snow from sidewalks and plaza areas depicted upon the Snow Management Plan by means of a bobcat, an ATV and/or by hand between the hours of 7 an d 8:30 on all mornings following a snowfall of inches or more. 3. A will store snow in temporary sow storage areas within the drop zones and within o to severe days of a 4" snowfall will use loaders and trucks to remove the snow stored there and transport it from the site. Impacts on traffic congestion will determine the speed and frequency of removal of snow from the temporary snow storage areas® VA will remove snow immediately if snow storage results in congestion in the drop-off zones causing auto stacking into the street. ® At the end of each ea Period and the ski season the Assessment Committee or its designee will review snow removal performance during the season and, as necessary, make recommendations for adjustments or improvements to the Tier I techniques described above. ®) Tier 11. In the event that some or all of the Tier I techniques designed to manage snow have note ectively cleared the snow from the drop off zones or other public areas and/or have impacted circulation on the public streets, then VA will implement recd en ations made by the Assessment Committee or its designee. I® TICKETING s The ticketing function primarily occurs right before a guest is ready to ski; that is, after that guest has arrived at Golden Peak. VA believes that any congestion that may occur at the ticketing area at Golden Peak has no impact on traffic congestion at the Golden Peak Base Facility. However, to improve the experience of the guest, VA has implemented a `direct to lift" program to relieve congestion at all ticketing areas. For the, past few years, VA has implemented scanning technology that has allowed season pass holders to bypass the ticketing window. This technology will be expanded in the 95-96 ski season to include Colorado Card and the new Vail Valley Club Card members. There were approximately 25, Colorado Card holders for the 94-95 ski season. The Vail Valley Club Card is new forte 95-96 ski season an targets the destination guest. It is estimated that approximately , cards will be issued forte 5 -96 ski season. This process will work as follows® any holder of Colorado Card or Vail Valley Club Card will be required on his or her initial visit to go to the ticketing window and provide a credit card. Upon subsequent visits to Vail Ski Mountain, card holders.will have their Colorado or Vail Valley Club Car scanned at the maze, thereby irect y charging their credit card with the appropriate charge and reducing the queing at the window. I. SPECIAL EVENTS AND RACING Golden Peak is the site of any ski races and special events during the course of ski season. Typically the racing season begins in mid-December and runs through early April. 'Training for ski racing can be broken down as follows: Ski 2 Club Vail generates 60,000 gate starts per year; high school programs add 7,50 ate starts per year; and corporate/club training events add 7,500 more starts per year. Actual racing starts for these three user groups are approximately 15,000 gate starts per year for Ski Club Vail, with an additional 2, 0 starts er year for local high cool programs, and 10,000 starts per year for corporate a club racing. These total roughly 102,000 gate starts per year and averse 4.5 ski racing events per week. Daily activity for ski racing ically commences at a. m. and continues until 4:30 p.m. Of these race events two or three major televised events occur each year, not all of which are headquartered out of the Golden Peak course. These include the Pro Tour, FIS World u and North American Trophy Series races. In 1999 the World Championships will be held at Vail and opening ceremonies are scheduled for Golden Peak. Race starts and e a for training space have been growing steadily fort the past decade. Special Events which occur at Golden Peak, in addition tot the routine racing programs, include various snowboar ing events which ra typically 100 to people, the U.S. Pro Tour which draws about 500 people, and Hot Winter Nights events which draw 500 to 1000 people typically in February and March and up to 3000 people during the Christmas holiday. (A.) Tier 1. Management techniques already utilized and in lace at Golden Peak or which will be implement wit redevelopment include: ® Snowboarding events typically held in non-peak periods are usually small with ini al impact on portal arrivals or use® Arrivals and staging of event participants ill be managed with VA personnel on an "as needed" basis. 2. Hot Winter Nights events are held during off hours and do not interfere with other portal arrivals or demands on infrastructure® These will be managed with VA personnel on an "as needed" basis. ® Major events, such as televised FIS racing events, the World Championships, aor bicycle race events, and summer fireworks will be managed through the standard special event permitting process of the `I' V. ® At the, end of each eak Period and ski season the Assessment Committee or its designee will review and a e recommendations concerning ecial Events and racing activities at Golden Peak and their impacts on the al and congestion in the surrounding infrastructure (B.) "Tier U. In the event some or all of the Tier I techniques have been implemented and congestion as still resulted at the portal which adversely effects traffic or surrounding town infrastructure then VA will implement the recommendations of the Assessment Committee or its designee in the following ski season or Peak Period. In addition the following successive management tec i fires will be implemented: 1® Special events will be moved in part from this portal to down valley locations. t II® COMMERCIAL II ZOPJI IDERATIONS Zoning: Commercial Care li Area: 1.645 acres or 71,666.2 sq. ft. Allowed Proaased Height: 45 feet 16 feel Setbacks: 1 Ton all sides N: 14` S: 33" E: 13,0 w: 360` Site Coverage: 70% or 50,159 sq. ft. N/A for seasonal structure Parking: Parking is not required for temporary structures. Ill. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Eton review of Section 16.60, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the conditional use permit based upon the following factors: A. Consideration of FWIQr 1, Relationship and impact of the use I ctiv of the Town. The development Objectives of the Town of Vail can be found in the purpose section of the zone district as well as the zoning title of the Municipal Code. The purpose section of the Commercial Core Il zone district calls for a mixture of uses. Section 16.2.20(, 10), the purpose section for the zoning title, calls for the provision of recreational facilities, Staff believes that this recreational facility will continue to augment the ski school program in the Lidnshead area. We believe that ski school facilities are an appropriate use to add to the mixture of uses at the Lionshead ski base. 2. The effect of the use light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, other public facilities e Staff believes that there will not be any negative impacts to the criteria referenced above. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, u tiv and pedestrian safety and convenience, r is flow and control, access, rt uv r ili removal snow from the t t and parking areas. Staff believes that there will be little impact on traffic or related issues® Although the proposed structure may actually increase pedestrian traffic in the area, it is not likely to generate additional vehicular trips in Lionheade 2 I' _ s Y e SIR '{.'�$,..i ..:: t: tf»c $ $ , a* • a �..; i �1 are � . 2t ��n.4 s }� : • .,R @ `. ..°i";,F. „;qe4 g �...i.g,s 7f :%d'i•° i;<' 'i.5 r^ g -•�q”- r m,, ,e.4:-v ra. s:�.r :g. e .,,� {�s I ANN, y s a. r3 a g F d a,�'.. x,e <•v.:" ,p P,; FL,.. :.,R w 'Za1. ` a $ T."7;: • i r,a i- `v-?^• d.. ! " x {,:,, S 4 n WAS ,w* d S S8 y „ i°,+ J d i a: f a t I a lrg¢' L Ina' 1 �z i A } r �a ..Y . r , a i iv a a��_¢e o.nit §, §•8 �y{ ,. tQ Y' -.° # CIA P t . V P° J. WY! oil My jt ,j 5' i; _ i °r' e ' !• J...g'�j 4 :erg ? ] _P Y a 8 ..h. ! i P AWL 1 k 4 a Ia Y p at 11 F� s 4 w f n t, I1 r r MAN?� e:':t>t:4y. ! ".�• v� -. i ! . � � A 3 11 6 R - `'4. yy ( $ . a � Ilk e. qa x'�.$. a,.rw� "&. r• `}.. P L . ?.aP. vy yj -'.2 +? { � : -+ - • r ' fig :. .' ' � ,1 � C » es:�',.o.S t o ,�, ,�z' j tf ✓?yas'de P Y f .. s r r « ' ..R- y 'algi �B vc r e� `�.c „a: k' "::, } y.. '' u v _ RR ::�� R�i _a i.,n B'w`3$.° '!°. �4 i..�. :'Y 4 �o..Y �3• p.f. 'R, i ;d �. k i- 4 T .,i.'. ,, y! .may° O rS�& } �iF � si ��` d��t -:. a +fir.; r a': �•t 5. �. r =: sL'. .�; §'s.:(�g ;: ±a^,J >¢.:, t °,am ;;5.- �- ,r -.••�' E .'t - "> ,8p ,r.� r�� y. °�.. �.ga. „ {e 3• x a'a� t...e;r'a 5 # t, a,,. -r.r5 ,� a.•• a i a ;' r '.. �"4 :q i ;'� a a ,'K }' � r x,' �'` ! • v � "� ', s�c ' a' �, . ��g, fl � %Y�y "fir' L +: 4`s -.. �t:.�, <r;. u"v - f� fr �.�'' e -t _ F 4 � �. ".�w .[;, �'�, �•1:',t„ a °s" �°g dr..�,. ,tea rh <'ja ". �'. ' whp a4ay- ',c o- y,2; -� 9 dL++s..fe< t„9 ''4 S'°. .•d'.. ,w.:? a, �.,. Nr�� :a. - ,,^ - r a. 8 4 4 �'3. 9'. p° . 'P eA °ri R Y`aP� fit.): � •• § r" two _ { F SL d3r+tl� } p:. P a: :tf?A �tq T< . �' V t r Yd :A }_ h •, i i,r Win.. y]0 "yvY Ja pf: .•t a°j ",# :•w 4 ur;r �..,, .,i,r c,n r llt 6'ai.5r .8 :;�;.: >i ,F r{ w.a'g r c i{ u "s S x'44 qe� is : . wale av �`3Y awl—Q. { d Rg Y .t: d. ..w ..v,:. -'�:, ?� s� _.�•}: 8��e. �,: a. y :e. is°9 ''.st' ryL°a� .,$,`p "t��, :�§ a" g `1 ��`. 1. 4:,,. '> �• '< id'k -::.� �... «'R+ ,.::e ,r.�, .; .. 'ti °i' % =. a is vy.+..`,�� Le' a tiN� e. -� .9 n• ' ,. •,;,> . ;.„� %..w.la :'k.:'�.3,. eP. .': a .,.; f ....,;• 4;� ,:�;r 7 =; �: �. , +�:. u.e., e .�. ®;`a $ �-s,. .r ��: ,� ... .,v4. _ >,._ at ..4 ::�.. e:., � ,..;;. � .. ..., M. :.q <... .,�., °,.a> ..x.,,,.: .•:a'. s;�a,....7�t..a. -a•,. x,ly .,s.. ,.'� : ..� •p".r. e as ;t ti^? .�a s:¢iab <x . �`5 �.. 1L° s r,• � . : 2a -?.:4 , - .. & ,F v } g,.- -.'e. egq�i� "�f � "r : y', a', $.A <aw.`' z ,`.a,•,.�,,�y':$'r -' :a� g'.*?:�. ga U.:..,; rY.' -kA° "k.& d � ?�a�,-F:'s. s t ��: �, -:o �� .,r'$� °'i .':e> d•"9. e°a+`Y. s•§n -. at " ® °r. y r_•§ •E� ri ;. .:w'J -a= `i. s ,y�c _a [�" . °� 4 s � „ @ -. T , w a �+ , 7. ..,'�i`X •im:. °P,:.® ya} Y.; •,�a:FS.. i �., i -e 'Be: � a,. i �'P eC:`� rN... � y°,.- �m�;.$ �^ ,( y. •}i. wyta.. :. •eC -'`° r� a :�•! �.P� ;,� . a-. _£. ,�!. d•-'^a s'nr ,a^°_d• v �.i� -!a_F a s. @. .d } s °- ...r _ y: ..�,y$:+Y �: 'i �.,,, .C.: "� +�m:: _�: L'..: $_+c°;'t: $� ..:o::iv.: +Bn` °�1, a:, -.}„a9 ?_ *`� •$a.w. ag .e. p. { r> �i uN..: .;�::8). '.9. .'r'. Y�' r:a ~x „T�$ai, � e. k.. �.. g., a" 3,: yk,,,:S'm, §. ;,i.,a -e . *$ °'.�.r..i':.z e p �. -e;> i:" ,, a_ '�Y�+ °, "°�� -�� -� rb'::i•a.. :�i, x ,� « . :,,. ,e'3 ° e- ,.:�... 'C§: . >:. -. _� �,.. .nr«aa " °h. o `hc,::,.. �. -,. _t� .•, , . �. a .`�'.,,, a; . -�._' e u b`.� �f�ro -.ss, ,r^. :.-a. �.� a� � -�a. ,.at�," � •. -per ,r •: .. ,�c .. d: tF... r.:�. � s ,s.`'S. _. , �# � Y. a ark : ; :a> . + . � ,' � -nk' d.:s'�'`^• g �ba 'ia, �:.i � a . { ..sir myy e._ ryry r � '. "Z:v ��vv P sib„ "• a:4- .:n. .,y':, a..�': _ .�.� .rwg, m ., "Y ,:e ,,,. �,:. :� z�.��r', „�D. 4..�{ gip. c�. e4 ur':a -- d..p .'aa' ;"•i. � 9 �. ,�.,d : t d .�•?�. ,. .... �iC.,m,° .. %:.f ati Z`;. "" #,. .a^ *!�+- .4gy�'$.�ti y�'a ;sr �'&s`'sti' a "L��a "�^° � d �„+ -s�, , C. 'p> .a +b ,.� «`s . $.. .f . i °x? ?6't''s': a: �r�. • ;vb�i .• :.`a,•. . ° 4`%' _ is Via+ , "�•S rp ,.: ; , �+ �,, �;"�°";' ° �'�, > i a I t ....., aw. :,.r ✓a ":'�;.'. - «�. re.,a1.,# :.- a a q °° z : 2 :z -' d a,—�°.,,^°8._'°s n .,Z ,m4 tp i r . W� j ffl } t & td t r..d m 'f� {� � } > t t^ ". Y g.� .,V t l'DY #a W �' t:a1 :a P g q p g;i 9 �' ¢t :d E c �` : a ; r � MIKE!; �`ks' �q.& '• k�' t "� }dY P 4 :. •@-j e4 s ,..4" �S .+ �x`'t+ s o- i x 5:�°+� „') '.� $now '.�.�_� �it�:�:.'e �_" Ek. ;i � s -:. � B °°grn �,'� <'^-� � *.,... t :?� a, +f i� -;_ 'x �. a� :..� ?� �r . }, >' "; ` e a- � � •.t , ` .:��� 4 . r L - ;a .p "r ��g: aci %: a +P �;, r # m 'u v�r ®.3r a . +..�! E -:+� � ^+fie 'T"¢ ",a't .qt _, i pill; e4 $; :. w, �'R •.� t 8 -. ".t, x a::.°ya,74 -4�.+i s- T' ' •Pe°,y`�;:.f� r. ^x & 'asiL -j . i,ry �' w 8Y ® k s sg lr AD All t�. a Lap &�''fl 1'Fkr p� CC °li, v `} Y "d. ,� •Y�.d - ei i t .k VITA {q ,Agsaa � ate ..,� ro � _ °� , g'4d - d � ' o �,•a� � pra° 4'-=. a ag x "� ''a`� �/' --ro as � .�,e a �,ra 7 a r � �$� j� td aS l ^ 4 � Q a f ta $ r° 9 .SaM igloos } z r d t most F; s INI JA d. °" a- � � i }'�, +gq. ,y i P wd ;t �}e ♦ d 4 �, � ' I , � I a # a` ",'' t >yz ca, 1 e A '! { J 0 a q 4 $ ® ma . id f + p I 4l °'° 4t f+ 7 a ,r r Loot, tr: tP ( t yy . _s kt " f ' > M ; r t E a ..A xii r - �. y s 9' ,q f ` .� ,�, ' :r9 'fig �✓ S '.`e `; j T' }; MAY, l a : p7. �- j: `..��� 's• wts,tj A d t oil e,tl b ai c c yj ..a. -.�° Aa''': dsa!g�`� N a t'+` rt «. { < `� + t a• tmi r, i'C7aa P rhea`Px t �::t;. } .g'6R +.'�' r i -. it.a lt. 'S.',:. .�. E '-� d°,,.`s,- ,�:... s� t 6±`., .a R4 .e'.• .,�. &: -, z r i r,` "tt:� °3 F.. tt �. r. °.'`�°`. - Htiy°.. ;t,,.. :' + .'#: H.d."a'.i 5fi ^agt{ ha R. -Yt :v:9d'., n_,L- :3.e � �� t°� . � :r -"u f^ 'f � r � , a• #i �a«�'b �$v'S t, �arr.:C��ais «s -� �>..wy k°' } gi-. ej ..�'t tq e!s'„ .� �'� ' f. = ''✓`c",i ,\,.'I,^,.'Sp, at'..- @'t'°tp +` .fig - '`qM 'Y4 1- p . . + 6 � `.. .r,•7 -'.r -s�-�° '..,. :..- �'��' «,;i.' .: °:: �...,;: i� g d « i �9 a a$ P .4,xs R a e -WAS, $- 1 y R. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, p transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, t r public facilities needs. Staff believes there will be little to no impact from the proposed use on the criteria referenced above, 3. Effect upon traff is with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian f convenience, tr is flow and control, cress, maneuverability, and removal of snow from street and parking r sQ One issue that staff has discussed with the applicant relates to the vehicular and pedestrian traffic generated by the bank. in order to minimize the traffic generated by the bank, the applicant is proposing courier service throughout the Village. The goal of this service is to provide banking services without requiring customers to walk or drive to the bank. Staff believes that this is an important service as automobile access to this site, and on -site parking, is not as convenient as other banks in the community. The parking requirement for this use is different than a retail uses Retail floor area requires one space for every 300 sq. ft. of floor area. Banks and financial institutions require one parking space for every 200 sq. ft. of floor area. As a result, there is a net increase of 0.75 spaces. Please see below. Total square footage in commercial ace - 760 � . ft. divided b 300 = 2.53 q p Y Proposed floor area for bank use - 657 sq. ft. divided by 200 = 3.26 Net increase of spaces = 0.75 As the underlying zoning of this parcel is Commercial Core I, the applicant is required to pay into the parking fund for the increased parkin requirement. At this tine, parking spaces are assessed .at $15,660 per space. The parking fee is (.75)(15,660) = $11,745.00. If the building permit is not issued on this project until 1996, the parking amount will increase. 4. Effect upon e character oft r in which the ro os is to elocated, including the c l and I the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Staff believes that there will be no negative impacts tot the character of the area. The proposed changes are internal only and the exterior of the building will remain the same, f:\ everyone \pectmemos \i stbankeA 09 2 MEMOBANDUM 5 The approved Phase If additions were never built and the DRB approval granted on February g 1991 has lapsed. Since the site coverage regulations now include cantilevered areas and large roof overhangs, the applicant is new requesting site coverage variance to allow the construction of Phase 11 to occur. 111® ZONING STATISTICS Lot Size: 10,716 square feet Zoning: Primary /Secondary Residential Allowed Exi stin Pro used RFA: 3,529 sq. ft. 2,343 sq.ft. 3,753 sq.ft.* Setbacks: Front: 20` 52° Front: 21' Sides: 15'115' 20',23' Sides: 20', 2' Rear: 15° 17` Rear: 17' Site Coverage: 20% or 2,143 sq. ft. 15.1 % or 1,614 sq.ft. 22.6% or 2,425 sq.ft. Landscaping: 60% or 6,430 sq. ft. 69.3!® or 7,422 sq.ft. 61.7% or 6,611 sq.ft, Retaining Wall Heights: 6 feet (max.) 6 feet max. 6 feet Parking: 4 spaces required 6 spaces 6 spaces *The applicant has applied to the DRR for approval of one additional 250 sq.ft. GRFA allotment to cover this overage. IV. CRITERIA ANQ FINDINGS Upon review of the Criteria and Findings for variances, contained in Section 1 .62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends denial of the requested site coverage variance based on the following factors. A. Consideration of Factors: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to r existing r potential s and structures in the vicinity. The proposed addition adds significant mass and bulk to the structure, and makes it less compatible with some of the surrounding, smaller structures. However, the site coverage variance wou! d allow the applicant to build -out the allowable GRFA, including the use of an additional 250 square foot GRFA allot e'nt, and keep the building lower to the round than the current height restrictions would allow. The addition is partially buried in the hillside which reduces the mass and bulk of the structure when viewed from the west side (nearest neighbor). The applicant feels that the project fits into the neighborhood better if it is kept low and spread out across the lot rather than utilizing the remaining F by going more vertical with the design. However, this necessitates the requested site coverage variance. 2 r III. LZONING _ANALYSIS S The purpose of the Zoning Analysis depicted below is to provide the PEC wA an understanding of the impacts on the development standards, prescribed as plat notes on the Spraddle Creek Estates Subdivision final plat. Allowed r iii aooroved olao Aloed per a roved tart after the buildi- -, envelooe relooation Lot Area: 66,619 sq. ft. 66,619 sq. ft Building Envelope Size: 14,624 sq. ft. 14, 624 sq. ft. GRFA allowance: 6,546 sq. ft. 8,548 sq. ft. Site Coverage; 7,696 sq. ft. 7, 696 sq. ft. As you can see, the proposed relocation of the existing building envelope, to the location proposed by the applicant, will not cause a change to the development standards. The only change that will occur to the envelope will be the reconfiguration of the envelope. IV. _ SUBDIVISIO TE One of the basic premises of subdivision regulations is that the minimum s ds for the creation of a new lot must be met, Although this building envelope amendment essentially involves a minor replatting of an existing lot, there is no other process for review of such a request other than the minor subdivision process. As a result, this project will be reviewed under the same criteria, pursuant to Chapter 17 of the Town of hail Municipal Code. The first set of review criteria to be considered by the PEC for a minor subdivision application are as ®o s: A. Lot Area The Town of Vail Municipal Code indicates that the minimum lot or site area for a property located within the Hillside Residential zone district shall be 21,780 sq. ft. (1/2 acre) of buildable area. The Municipal Code dunes "buildable ea" as any site, lot, parcel or any portion thereof, which does not contain designated flooplain, red hazard avalanche, or areas in excess of 40% slope. The existing Lot 3 currently meets the minimum lot area requirements set forth above and the proposed building velope amendment will have no effect on the existing size of Lot 3. E. Mfltaue The Vail Municipal Code requires that lots in the Hillside Residential zone district have a minimum frontage of 50'. Lot 3 currently has a frontage in excess of 50'and the proposed building envelope amendment will not affect the frontage of the lot. f: \everyone\ \memos\dagostino.104 2 S 19f lies onset Staff believes that this proposal will not be detrimental to the value of land throughout Fail, nor will it be detrimental to the value of land in the immediate area of Lot 3. 4. To insure that subdivision of property is in compliance with the Town Zoning Ordinance, to achieve a harmonious', convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal development objectives. Staff Response: Staff believes that the proposed building envelope amendment proposed for Lot 3 will not preclude a harmonious, convenient and workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives. 5. To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide adequate and efficient transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreational and other public requirements and facilities and generally to provide that public facilities will have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. S ff Res onsee The purpose of the subdivision regulations is intended primarily to address impacts of large scale subdivisions of property, as opposed to this particular proposal to amend a building envelope. Staff does not believe that this proposal will have any negative impacts on any of the above listed public facilities. 6. To provide for accurate Iegal descriptions of newly subdivided land and to establish reasonable and desirable construction, design standards and procedures. SIaLf Response: This is an inherent goal of the subdivision sion re latio s that has little specific reference tot the proposed building envelope amendment for Lot 3. 7. To prevent the pollution of air, streams, and ponds, to assure adequacy of drainage facilities, to safeguard the water table and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the municipality in order to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the community and the value of land. S f Res onset Staff feels comfortable with the applicant's proposed building envelope amendment on Lot 3. 'There are however, three additional large aspen trees (6" to 8" in diameter) which will be lost as a result of the relocation of the building envelope. Most of the other trees that are located within the existing, as well as the proposed building envelope, are either dead or dying. Staff woul recommend that the loss of the three additional trees, plus those trees which will be lost during the construction process, be replaced at a minimum of a 1 e 1 ratio based upon caliper inches of trees as defined in Section 1 8.04 of the Municipal Code. Staff would further suggest that in the replacement of the existing trees, the applicant not only propose aspen trees, which currently are the only type of tree in existence on the property, but that the applicant also propose coniferous trees as well. Staff will review a landscape plan at the time of design review for the project. Staff is additionally concerned with the proposed driveway configuration and grade, The applicant is conceptually proposing to construct a winding driveway with a grade of approximately 12 %. The driveway proposed by the applicant will be heated . Staff is concerned that the relocation of the build °ng envelope, to a f: \everyone\ \memos \dagostino.109 4 MEMORANDUM The project was reviewed and ultimately approved by the Vail Town,Council and the Design Review Board in the Spring of 1995. Although the applicant had intended to demolish and begin construction of the new building in the spring of 1995, the applicant was not able to adhere to that schedule and demolition /construction has been delayed until the spring of 1996. In the meantime, the applicant has reconsidered the previously approved uses of the 3rd and 4th floors of the building. The new concept is to use the 3rd and 4th floors exclusively as that of a private club. The concept consists of offering it's members not only the traditional ski storage (in the basement), but also areas of comfort and relaxation together with an array of services. The applicant has indicated that club members would have the ability to ski down to the base of the mountain, give their skiis to the ski valet, and enter their own private club. Here they would have the luxury of taking off their boots, sitting down by the fireplace in a quiet atmosphere to relax in the comfort of their "mountain living room." They might enjoy the refreshment of their choice, make a couple of hone calls, check the stock market, send fax, hold a meeting or host a private dinner for their family, friends, or business associates. It is anticipated that the 3rd floor of the building would be used for: A. Personal lockers, steam room and showers (similar to a private golf club where bags are stored elsewhere); B. Office space for building and club operations; C. Lounge area where members could have a drink, make a call, send a fax; an D. Perhaps as many as three meeting and /or dining moms. The 4th floor is anticipated to be the "living room on the mountain." This is an area where members could sit by the fire and relax, meet with friends and family, have an appetizer and a drink. This Conditional Use Permit request does not involve any exterior changes to the previously approved building. 11® , CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS Since this is a worksession, staff will not analyze the request for compliance with the criteria for granting Conditional Use Permits. However, staff thought it would be helpful to the P C to be aware of the criteria, while discussing the issues in Section III of this memorandum. The PEC shall review a Conditional Use Permit application based on the following factors- A. Qonsideration of Factors. 1 Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. 2 U 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable private club. . f:\ everyone \pec \memos \serranos.104 FLOOR AREA CALaLAnoN5 �4A�A" i 6eDf lei jjbcltApE tP QV% 420 uF. Evil , MM 64L' 8Y will SF. 50 SP. not Smog) MIL wAh SF. NEW LE%M DU4 5F. 5An5Fa 511'j 5F, pmona--mly twv 05P oB POW,,. flpid 6 Fi,'T� 5,520 MAMXM d � I d 0 { ... .. FLOOR AREA GALCAR.A,TLoWX ' iWB3 (ahp.S Fd:P p LkVYi FL.laM ARFA pTtA7% iiAl6i ti, 0 SP. 129,3 SP, m f RST LEVEL 9988 5P. M21 5P. U0 SP, ii MK2 LEA 948 5F. 9A.A 3P, sP UZ TWIT NN 8 1 8 11 f£T fla' nFLA- nCM Wlc� t-lYVvQM6w . i a 5T SUE 9 9 -16F 6T 1 � I d ti, 0 i 8 1 f£T fla' nFLA- nCM Wlc� t-lYVvQM6w . i a oucad 1 ® e KqL DWILCH 4 acza \ DAUM s --- � I d d �AREA TONS -' •. ra 9Jtr7 *1 Wa 9128 S.P. SPA, S�AXV akYfli. Sr. 5F, 24Tia 5f. 5 #. . 9' 1Mtl 0 6d 5W4 5F. 3&. W5 6A. ➢OPW. 97jJFB °vS U,'Pd9'aP 9,92A bP B i F � Ee i y a �T a a AT—AE WT fto.R AIWA' a{ { 11 PKK a _ _ � B 9 B t A" Dam 3 ,8 e a't' I a MEMORANDUM !L CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. consideration of F=or . 1. Relationship and impact of the use v I nt objectives of the Town. The proposed temporary use will have a positive benefit to the community in that MRI facilities will remain available throughout the time it takes to replace and upgrade current MRI facilities inside the hospital. 2. The effect of the use on light air, distribution of population, transportation faciliti s, utilities, sc r recreation facilities, ..ter public facilities The proposed use will have no impact on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities. 3. Effect upon traff is with particular reference to congestion, u tiv and pedestrian safety and convenience, traff is flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the r e and parking r as. The temporary lab would displace emergency room drop-off parking and 3 handicap spaces. This will require friends or relatives of drive -up emergency room patients to park elsewhere in the parking lot. The handicap spaces will be relocated to spaces adjacent to the attendant's booth. These temporary spaces will be signed for handicap parking during the time the lab is parked at the hospital. The busiest season for the hospital starts with the Thanksgiving holiday weekend. Thus, staff feels that the lab should be removed before Thanksgiving week to avoid parking problems, . Effect upon the character f the area in which the r use is to elocated, inclu in the c t and I the r in relation to surrounding The lab will be clearly visible from the Evergreen Lodge. Pam Stenmark, General Manager at the Evergreen, has been contacted and did not have any major concerns with the MRI lab, as long as it is removed y the beginning of the peak ski season. Staff feels that the lab should be removed before Thanksgiving week. Staff feels that the 60 days requested by the applicant is excessive. We believe that a 'thanksgiving week deadline is more appropriate. The applicant will construct temporary power hook -ups from the main building o the generator on the lab will not be needed unless a power outage occurs. This ill eliminate noise problems. 2 MEMOELANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission SUBJECT: ¥v . for a density variance to allow for the construction of additional ?*©° within an existing primary/secondary residence, located at 3130 Booth Falls Court/Unit A, Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing. Applicant- Jeffrey & Eileen Shiffrin Planner- Randy Stouder c� r- w� LCA 'P10( a- � FILE COPY TO WN'OF V, �iPC Sent by Certif ied mail Dr. and Mrs. Jeff and Ilene Shi-Efrin 3130 Booth Falls Court Vail, CO 81657 RE: Unauthorized construction at the Shiff-ren Residence, 3130 Booth Falls Court/Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing I Dear Mr. and Mrs. Shiffren: Mr. and Mrs. Jeff and Ilene Shiffrin Page the framing inspection stage. Mr. dueller was required to remove the floor (or a substantial portion of the floor) in order to open the space up to the garage below.. Ilene asked ghat options would be available to remedy the situation short of removing the illegally constructed improvements. 1 told her that the house was too new to qualify for the 112501, addtion but that she could remove GRFA from some other portion of the property, to compensate for the new area added above the garage. I also pointed out that it was highly unlikely that a GRFA variance would be approved since the criteria for granting a density variance did not appear to be met in this instance. On August 2, 1995, 1 spoke with Jeff on the telephone. I explained that the purpose of ray phone call was to obtain your mailing address so that I could send you written instructions on the steps which roust be taken to resolve the violation. Jeff also asked +bout. the possibility of a variance. I pointed that although you have a right to apply, the criteria for granting a variance did not seem to be satisfied in this ease. I also told. Jeff that I felt that the violation needed to be corrected immediately, every if he intends to apply for a variance and that I would confirm this with the Town Attorney, which I have, prior to this letter being sent. Although the building and zoning code violations occuring at your residence are subject to fines of up to $1,000.00 per day and/or 90 days in jail for each day the violation continues, the Department of Community Development staff has decided to postpone issuing you a citation provided the following steps are immediately ted to resolve this matter® 1. A ly for a btxildin Fier it A complete building permit application must be submitted. The permit would allow you to proceed with the removal of the unauthorized improvements. The permit request must be received by the Town within 10 days of receipt of this certified letter. . Mork must be poerfo ed by a registered contractor - All demolition activity must be performed by a contractor who is registered (licensed) to work in the Town of Vail. 3® Gomiletion cif work - The area above the garage must be returned the its original condition within. 14 days after you receive an approved Town of Vail building permit. As previously mentioned, the Town is willing to postpone issuing you a citation for your building and zoning code violations in order to allow you to correct the problem. We are however, proceeding with enforcement action against the contractor who 0 performed the work. If you fail to request a building permit, or complete the work by the schedule identified in this letter, we will have no choice but to issue you a citation to appear in Municipal Court® im • • Thus, the memo listed it as unknown, since it was unknown at the time of the completion of the memo. Jim asked if this building height was 35 or 40 feet. M Planning and Enviromnental Commission Minutes October 9, 1995 9 � @A 6 He agreed with staff that the flat roof cannot exceed 5'a 0 • 1791=111 W Dave Corbin doesn't feel the addition of stone to the wall is a do or die issue. Bob Armour thought the applicant should sort through the comments on the following, The north elevation, the garage, that the size of the balconies be reduced, especially the south balconies shading a public area because people want to sit in the sun and reduce the amount of flat roof. W Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes October 9, 1995 5 We should not expect VA to have site specific housing with this project Henry Pratt reel with Jeff Bowen, but wishes that VA would find some additional units in Vail for employee housing. Kevin Deighan had no comment regarding requiring employee housing. Greg sden had no comment with requiring employee housing. Jim Lamont asked if sufficient legal standing,, what's the difference between this and an SDD application. Bob cLaurin, Town Manager, said that VA has done. a good job and has done more for housing than anyone else in the valley. The document between VA and the Town addresses macro issues. Mike Mollica said e don't have the legal authority to set a specific number of units required per project and that it was a broad spectrum. Mike asked for clarification on the involvement VA has in the Commons project. Dave Corbin said he doesn't know how the $660,000 contribution for Eagle Bend was derived. VA's pledge and contribution with the TOV will be equal to that of Eagle Bend. Dave doesn't know to what degree, but pledges that VA will stand behind their commitment. Bob cL urin said we have to get back to VA with the dollar amount needed for the Commons project. Jim Curnutte pointed out that the proposed zoning code text amendments will be discussed at the October 25th PEC worsession. 2. A request for a Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P. )to allow for a temporary tent for the Vail Associates ski school and children's pavilion to be located at the Lionshead ski base, Tract D, Vail /Lions pa , 1 st Filing. Applicant- Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy Planner: Randy Stouder Randy Stouder gave an overview of the request. Joe Macy clarified that the application was for a seasonal use, however, not just for the coming winter, but rather for -5 winters or more. The need is going to continue. The staff's recommendation is for only one year. Joe Macy would like to have multiple years. Bob Armour commended VA, as the removal of the tent last year was timely. Kevin Deighan said if it was multi-year, he would like to see a more permanent structure built to house the ski school activities. If not, he would like to see a 1 year C.U.P. only. Greg s en would not be opposed to 2-3 years, but also would like to see a permanent structure if the use continues. He feels a 2-3 year term would eliminate this time consuming process again. Jeff Bowen asked Joe how many years would he need. Planning and Environmental Commission N inutes October 9, 1995 0 13 Bob Armour stated he was in favor of the one year term, so they would not have to wait 3 yearsm to remedy any problem. He stated that the PEC received complaints when the tent was near t bike path. Joe Macy stated that the tent was moved off the bike path when the problem arose. If a problem, arises again, VA will work the problem out with staff. Mike Mollica said the Planning Commission can call-up any problem, regardless of the term of the C.U.P. Joe Macy mentioned that VA has a favorable letter from the Lionshead Condo Association. Kevin Deighan seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously with a vote of 5-0. Planning and Environmental Commission Mnutes 7 October 9, 1995 Randy ar an said that 2 spaces will be dedicated to the bank. Valet parking will be another convenience. The Gateway garage has not ever been completely full. He feels courier service Is a good service. He mentioned that we are not trying to exclude anyone, but retail banking needs are being currently met. We are wanting to offer lokey banking to larger money types of loans. First Bank of Eagle County has common ownership with several banks with $7 million in assets. They are a larger loan bank for high end customers. Henry ra said the valet service doesn't work now, but he is in favor of the service. Kevin Deighan said arkin at the Gateway is terrible. But given the type of banking service being reposed, he doesn't feel a lot of activity will be generated and so he is in favor of it. Randy ar an said the bank will be open from 9arn to 9pm having the same hours as the atrium. Greg s en thanked Randy for the explanation. Is it possible to get Leo Palmas to increase the number of parking spaces for the Bank's use? He does envision some short term activity. Bob r our said he was opposed to this, since the building has had quite a bit of turnover. The parking will require a condition of the pay in lieu. Jeff Bowen made a motion that the request be approved in accordance with the memo with the condition that they pay into the pay-in- lieu parking fund and that 4 spaces be made available for customers on a reserved basis. Kevin Deighan seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously with a vote of ®0. Randy Garman complimented the staff, especially Andy knudtsen and Mike Mollica. . A request for a minor subdivision to allow for a shift in the location of a building envelope located on Lot 3, Spraddle Creek Subdivision. Applicant: Luis A. 'Agostino Planner. George Ruther George Ruther made a brief presentation of the requested shift to the platted building envelope on Lot 3. Bob Armour asked if there was any public input. Jeff Bowen made a motion that the request be approved in accordance with the staff memo, specifically noting on page 5 both conditions; to mitigate the loss of aspen at a 1:1 ratio based on caliper inches and that the new envelope location be approved by the Spraddle Creek Architectural Control Committee. Kevin Del han seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously, with a vote of -0, Planning and Environmental Commission ssion Minutes October 9, 1995 EMI 5. A request for a worksession for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a private c u to e located on the 3rd and 4th floors of the Serranos Building located at 298 Hansen Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing. ` * ` , ^ ° � ~ Jim Curnutte asked PEC if they agreed with the staff interpretation GI I en Heelan reiterated that a 2.4.2 is an interpretation for the community. w Randy Stouder said that it is not eligible for a 250 yet. 10. Council Reports fleveayone \pec n 110995 13