HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-0325 PEC
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBUC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that ihe Planning and Environmentai Commission of the Town of Vail
will hold a pub)ic hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town
of Vail on March 25,1996, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of;
A request for a Minor SDD amendment to ai(ow for streetscape improvements to the Cascade
Village Subdivision entrance focated at 1300 Westhaven Drive/Intersection of Westhaven Dr. and
South Frontage Road.
Applicant: L-O Westhaven Inc., represented by Skip Behrhorst
Planner: Randy Stouder
A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of the Hubcap Brewery (a brew
pub) located at 143 East Meadow Drive/Tract P, Block 5D, Vait Viflage 1st Filing.
Applicant: Lance Lucey
Planner: Dorninic Mauriello
A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion to an
existing residence located at 802 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 4, Block 1, Potato Patch.
App(icant: Padraic Deighan, represented by Steve Riden
Planner: Randy Stouder
~ A request for a Major Exterior Alteration in the CCII zone district to allow for a lobby expansion at
the Lions Square Lodge located at 660 W. Lionshead Place/ Lat 1, Vail-Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Lions Square Lodge Condominium Association, represented by John Railton
Planner: Jim Curnutte '
A request for a residentiaf addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion to an
existing duplex residence located at 1415 Westhaven/Lot 52, Glen Lyon.
Applicant: Neil Sirotkin, represented by David Irwin ,
Planner: George Ruther
Sign language ?nterpretation available upan request with 24 haur notification. Please call 479-2114 i
voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
Community Development Department
Published March 8, 1996 in the Vail Trail.
. jJ, v
;
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSI4N
March 25, 1996
AGENDA
Overview & Update on Environmental Programs and Projects - Russell Forrest 11:00 am
Proj.ect Orientation / Luncfi 11:30 pm
Site Visits 12:30 pm
1. Deighan - 802 Potato Patch Drive
2. Orrison - 1464 Aspen Grove Lane
3. Sirotkin - 1415 Westhaven 4. Lions Square Lodge - 660 West Lionshead Place
5. Hubcap Brewery - 143 East Meadow Drive
Driver: George
Pubtic Hearina 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion
• to an existing duplex residence located at 1415 Westhaven/Lat 52, Glen Lyon.
Applicant: Neil Sirotkin, represented by David Irwin
Planner: George Ruther
2. A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion
to an existing residence located at 802 Potato Patch Drive/Lof 4, Block 1, Potato Patch.
Applicant: Padraic Deighan, represented by Steve Riden
Planner: Randy Stouder
3. A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of the Hubcap Brewery
(a brew pub) and for an outdoor dining area located at 143 East Meadow Drive/Tract P,
Block 5D, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Lance Lucey
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
4. A request for a Major Exterior Alteration in the CCII zone district to allow for a lobby
expansion at the Lions Square Lodge located at 660 W. Lionshead Place/ Lot 1, Vail-
Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Lions Square Lodge Condominium Association, represented by John
Railton
Planner: Jim Curnutte
~
.
a~
~
5. A'request for a Front Setback Variance and a request to utilize the 250 Ordinance to ~
allow for a garage and a Type I EHU to be constructed at 1464 Aspen Grove Lane/Lot 10,
Biock 2, Lions Ridge Filing No. 4.
Applicant: Carrol Orrison, represenied by Tom Braun
Planner: Mike Mollica
, 6. A request for a Minor SDD amendment to allow for streetscape improvements to the
Cascade Village Subdivision entrance located at 1300 Westhaven Drive/Intersection of
Westhaven Dr. and South Frontage Road.
, Applicant: L-O Westhaven Inc., represented by Skip Behrhorst
Planner: Randy Stouder
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 8,1996
7. Information Update
8. Approval of March 11, 1996 PEC minutes.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356
TDD for information.
~
I
I ~
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
~ March 25, 1996
FINAL AGENDA
Overview & Update on Environmental Programs and Projects - Russell Forrest 12:00 am
Proiect Orientation / Lunch 12:30 pm
Site Visits 1:00 pm
1. Sirotkin - 1415 Westhaven
. 2. Lion Square Lodge - 660 West Lionshead Place
3. Hubcap Brewery - 143 East Meadow Drive ,
Driver: George
Public Hearing 2=00 p•m• I
1. A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion ,
to an existing duplex residence located at 1415 Westhaven/Lot 52, Glen Lyon. I
Applicant: Neil Sirotkin, represented by David Irwin
Planner: George Ruther
~ MOTION: Henry Pratt SECOND: Kevin Deighan VOTE: 5-1-1 (Diane Golden
opposed, Greg Amsden abstained) I
` APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
2. A request for a Cond'+tional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of the Hubcap Brewery
(a brew pub) and for an outdoor dining area located at 143 East Meadow Drive/Tract P, .
Block 5D, Vail Village 1st Filing. .
Appiicant: Lance Lucey
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION: Gaylan Aasland SECOND: Gene Uselton VOTE: 7-0
- - APPROVED WITH 10 CONDITIONS
3. A request for a Major Exterior Alteration in the CCII zone district to allow for a lobby expansion at the Lion Square Lodge located at 660 W. Lionshead Ptace/ Lot 1, Vai1-
Lionshead 1 st Filing. .
° Applicant: Lion Square Lodge Condominium Association, represented by John
Raiiton
Planner: Jim Curnutte
MOTION: Kevin Deighan SECOND: Henry Pratt VOTE: 7-0
~ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
4. A request for a Front Setback Variance and a request to utilize the 250 Ordinance to
allow for a garage and a Type I EHU to be constructed at 1464 Aspen Grove Lane/Lot 10,
Block 2, Lions Ridge Filing No. 4. ~
Applicant: Carrol Orrison, represented by Tom Braun
Planner: Mike Mo!lica
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 8,1996
~ 5. A request for a Minor SDD amendment to allow for streetscape improvements to the
Cascade Village Subdivision entrance located at 1300 Westhaven Drive/Intersection of
~ Westhaven Dr. and South Frontage Road.
Applicant: L-O Westhaven Inc., represented by Skip Behrhorst
Planner: Randy Stouder
, TABLED UNTIL APRIL 8,1996
6. A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion
to an existing residence located at 802 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 4, Block 1, Potato Patch.
Applicant: Padraic Deighan, represented by Steve Fiiden
Planner: Randy Stouder
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 8,1996
7. Information Update ~
8. Approval of March 11, 1896 PEC minutes.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356
TDD for information.
~
t
r'
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: March 25, 1996
SIiBJECT: A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an
expansion to an existing duplex residence located at 1415 Westhaven Dr.ive/Lot .
52, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Neil Sirotkin, represented by David Irwin
- Planner: George Ruther
1. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
In 1985, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance #4, Series of 1985 which created Chapter
18.71 of the Vail Municipal Code, entitled "Additional Gross Residential Floor Area." This chapter allows for up to 250 square feet of additional gross residential floor area (GRFA) to be added to a
dwelling (beyond the maximum allowance), provided certain criteria are met. The purpose of the
additional GRFA ordinance is to provide an inducement for the upgrading of existing dwelling
units, which have been existence for a period of at least 5 years, by permitting up to two hundred
. and fifty (250) square feet of GRFA to be added to a dwelling unit.
In August 1995, the Town Council approved Ordinance 6, Series of 1995 which amended
Chapter 18.71, for the purpose of eliminating the ability to use the additional GRFA when a
dwelling unit is "demo/rebuilt." This Ordinance also requires that all requests for additional
GRFA, that involve exterior changes to a building, be reviewed and approved by the Planning
and Environmental Commission.
With this proposal, the applicant is requesting to add 226 sq. ft. of GRFA to the south unit of the
. duplex at 1415 Westhaven Drive. The proposal utilizes the 250 GRFA allowance to construct a
.new home office adjacent to the master suite, on the second floor of the existing structure. The
new space created beneath the proposed office will be an exterior carport. The carport has been
designed so that the exterior walls of the carport are more than 25% open, and therefore the
area is not calculated as GRFA. The area however, is calculated as additional site coverage on
the property. The remaining 24 sq. ft. of the 250 sq. ft. allowance not being utilized with this
proposal, will remain available for future development. Reductions of the proposed building .
elevations have been attached for reference.
11. ZONING ANALYSIS
Legal Description: Lot 52, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Address: 1415 Westhaven Drive, Unit A
Lot Size: 21,026 sq. ft. / 0.483 acre
~ Zoning: Special Development District No. 4 with underlying zoning of Primary/Secondary Residential
f:\everyone\pecMemos\,sirotkin.325 1
0
~ i
Use: Primary/Secondary Residences
Allowed Existin Proposed ,
GRFA": 3,036 sq. ft. 3,028 sq. ft. 3,254 sq. ft.
Site Coverage: 5,256 sq. ft. 4,186 sq. ft. 4, 555 sq. ft.
Roguired ist' Proposed
Parking: 3 spaces 2 enclosed spaces no change
1 surface space
• The GRFA total reflscts the maximum GRFA allowed for the primary unit based upon the Zoning Code and the
existing strucwre.
' ill. CRlTERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Chapter 18.71, Additional GRFA, the Community Development Department
recommends approval of the request for additional GRFA based upon the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
Before acting on an application for additional GRFA, the Planning and Environmental
Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use:
1. Effect upon the existina toooyrachy, moetation draina9e and existina
structures. ~
Upon review of the proposed site plan, staff feels the 250 Additional GRFA
request will have minimal impacts on the existing topography, vegetation
or drainage. The surface area of the existing driveway will be increased by
approximately 625 square feet to accommodate an approach into the new
carport space. The increase in additional driveway area does not
negatively impact the landscaping requirement for the property.
The removal of existing vegetation will be minimai. An area of natural . grasses will be affected. The affected area is approximately 975 square
feet in size. No trees will be removed as a result of the addition. The
applicant has proposed to add three, 5'-7' tall spruce trees and six, 2"
caliper aspen trees to the property.
_ The proposed addition will have no negative impacts on the existing
structure. The applicant has proposed to use building materials which
match the existing materials of the residence. This includes stucco, stone
base, wood trim and cedar shake shingles. Staff feels the proposed
addition will match the architecture of the existing residence, and
, therefore, will not appear as a"tacked on" addition.
2. Impact on ad.acent12ro e~rties.
The addition does not encroach upon any required setbacks. The height •
of the addition is substantially lower than the height of the existing
residence. The architecture and building materials of the addition are
' f:teveryone\pecUnemoslsirotkin.325 2
proposed to match the existing structure. In staff's opinion, the addition
will not have any negative impacts orr adjacent properties.
3. Compliance with the Town's zoning reauirements and aonlicable
development standards.
5ection 18.71.020 (F) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, requires that
any single family dwelling or dwelling unit for which an addition is proposed
sha!l be required to meet the minimum Town of Vail landscaping
standards as set forth in Chapter 18.54 of the Vail Municipal Code.
Additionally, before any additional GRFA may be permitted in accordance
with Chapter 18.71, the staff shall review the maintenance and upkeep of
the existing single family or two family dwelling and site, including
landscaping, to determine whether they comply with the Design Review
Guidelines. These standards include landscaping, undergrounding of
utilities, driveway paving and general maintenance of the property.
The driveway is already paved and the new portion of the driveway
required to access the carport is proposed to be paved. Utilities servicing
the property are currently underground and the landscaping on the
property complies with the Design Review requirements. The applicant is
proposing to add three, 6-7' tall spruce trees and six, 2" caliper aspen
trees to the property.
In staff's opinion, the general maintenance and upkeep of the property is ~
• excellent. B. Findinas:
The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before
granting approval for Additional GRFA:
1. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would not negatively
affect existing topography, vegetation, drainage and existing structures.
2. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would not negatively
impact adjacent properties. '
3. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would comply with all
Town zoning requirements and applicable development standards.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION •
The Community Development Department staff recommends approval of this application for 226
square feet of additional GRFA. Staff believes that the review criteria have been met as
discussed in the memo. Regarding the findings, staff believes that finding B1 is met, as the
proposed addition will not negatively impact the existing site; Finding B2 is met, as the proposed
addition will not negatively impact adjacent properties; Finding 63 is met, as the proposed
addition will comply with all zoning requirements and applicable development standards.
• Should the Planning & Environmental Commission choose to grant an approval of this request,
staff would recommend that the approval carry with it the following conditions:
f:\everyone\pecMemos\sirotkin.325 3
.
1. That the Public Works Department approve the proposed plans prior to the issuance of a ~
Building Permit.
•
•
f:~everyone\peclmemos\.sirotkin.325 4 .
7
. ~ - .
o' Dy ~ • ~ .`j .i 71
~ • • . . fI`~ " I~
( • ' , ~ . ~
~ _ ' •
. . . , l._.\
\ ~ 1 ~I
. `
_,s~~ ~,i~' , ' ~,~~Y~~-e , _ , i
~ ~ ...r-r
~
r
i
i
- i C ' J\/ _ ~l,•~ ~ , i a..... _ : ..r ~
~ ?
S e..vEu ' ' •~ti.::
• Y~F:
.
~ tji~•
.
•
1_t.!
V
z
LI.I
0 '
~
' W ~
cv ~
i
~
_ . . • ' '
„
.
~
: -J -
~ - - - - - - c
r- - - - - ~ -~t r ~ ~ ~ • M-M-1
;~LL L-1
WEST ELEVQTION o
z
~
U
' W
O r-
~ Q
a n
A
• ~ • ! -
•
~
1 - I
~ ~ ~ -
- - GAR~GE ~O"L7 7~
SOUTH ELEU,4TION
~
~
~
%
y
-c.k. 80=2'- 6"
Tc
,
= . ~
- -
, . - - _ - - _ - i
Q q ~ - ~ - - - .
-J,
~
y
` :"'M~.: .l' . ~ ' ' _~t~... J iF .11 . .l . . . . • ~
I. ~ # .
'I
EAST ELEU,4TION
~
MEMORANDUM ~
TO: Pianning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: March 25, 1996
RE: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of the Hubcap
Brewery (a brew pub) and an outdoor dining area located at 143 East Meadow
Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village, First Filing (Crossroads). CU-96-01
Applicant: Lance Lucey
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
-
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUESTS.
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of the Hubcap
Brewery. The Hubcap was granted a Conditional Use Permit on October 22, 1990 to allow for a
Brew Pub which sells beer or ale at wholesale or sells beer or ale for off-site consumption. The
conditions of approval were:
~ 1. The applicant shall provide a delivery service for any wholesale customers and
shaN not allow wholesale customers to pick up the product at the site.
2. The applicant shall not make deliveries more than once a week to wholesale
cus#omers.
3. The applicant shall conduct all deliveries via the existing loading dock.
4. The applicant shall not use any vehicle larger than a pick-up truck to make
deliveries. .
The applicant wants to expand this operation into existing retail spaces within the Crossroads
Plaza currently occupied by Denim and Silk and This Wicked West. The request will expand the
restaurant seating area by 35 interior seats for a total of 176 seats and will expand the area used
for brewing by 87 sq.ft. The bar area, kitchen, and bathrooms will also be expanded. The
bathrooms will be _upgraded to meet ADA requirements. Rekord doors will be installed which wi{I
form a glass wall that can be opened along the south and east frontages. The request also
includes the provision of outdoor seating located in the existing grass area located south of the •
Denim and Silk space. The outdoor dining area will contain 9 white metal mesh tabies and 36
seats. No umbrellas are proposed as part of this request. The area will be improved with pavers
and new landscaping will be installed consisting of Aspens, Redtwig Dogwoods, and Potentilla.
The ground cover will be mulch with perennials. A retaining wall will be installed which will be 2'
in height along the interior patio and 6" in height along the exterior. The wall will be stucco to
match the existing building. The area will also be enclosed with a railing to match the existing
~ railings on site. The existing railroad ties will be removed.
1
~
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning: Commerciai Service CeMer (CSC) ~
Lot Area: 0.8058 acres/35,100.65 sq. ft.
~ Allowed/Reauired Existina Prooosed
Landscaping: 7,020 sq. ft. (200/6) 5,797.36 sq. fl. (16.50/6) 5,797.36 sq. ft. (16.50/0)
Parking: 22 spaces required 19 spaces provided* 3 additional spaces provided (re-striping plan)
Beer produced: 1,500 barrels 1,400 barrels 1,400 banels
Beer sold off-site: 15% 11% 11%
Floor area: N/A 4,726 sq. h. 6,340 sq. ft.
qe for breving: 25% 21 % (1,000 sq. ft.) 17% (1,087 sq. ft.)
`Based on current occupancy for the Hubcap, Denim and Silk and This Wcked West.
The zoning issues of this request relate to parking and landscaping. The staff has determined
that Crossroads II (which houses the Hubcap) is a separate development from the Crossroads I
(which houses Alfalfa's, etc.) and therefore must be treated separateiy when apptying zoning
requirements, such as parking and landscaping.
The Crossroads 11 development is currently deficient with respect to both parking and landscaping and is therefore an existing nonconforming use. There are 87 parking spaces
provided on-site and the required paricing is approximately 133 parking spaces. In determining ~
the parking impacts of this request, staff first determined the parking required for the existing
uses (i.e., Hubcap, Denim and Silk, and The Wicked West). The current requirement for these
uses is 19 parking spaces. Since the uses are existing, staff allowed this number of spaces as a
credit towards the request. The parking required for the proposed expansion is 22 parking
spaces. Therefore, the net parking required for this expansion is three (3) parking spaces. The
applicant has submitted a parking re-striping proposal to obtain these three pafking spaces within
the existing parking structure.
. The site requires 7,020 sq. ft. of landscaping or 20% of the total site area. There is currently
' 5,797.36 sq. ft. of landscaping located on-site, or 16.5% of the total site area. The only impacts ,
to landscaping are the conversion of an existing "softscape" area to an outdoor dining area (520
sq.ft.). The zoning code allows patios to be counted as landscaping and therefore, technically,
there is no loss of landscaping on-site.
' The proposed modifications to the property are consistent with the Streetscape Master Plan for
the area. The Plan calls for the removal of ttie railroad tie planters in the area and recommends
, either returning these planters to grade or replacing the railroad ties with boulders or stone walls.
The proposed outdoor seating area implements these recommendations by removing the railroad
ties and returning the planters to grade.
The Zoning Code requires that the wholesale sales of beer or ale, and the sale for off-site
consumption, not exceed 15% of the product manufactured by the brew pub on an annual basis.
The applicant has projected that they will sell about 11 % at wholesale or for off-site consumption
in 1996. The Zoning Code aiso requires that a brew pub not produce more than 1,500 barrels of
beer or ale per year. The applicant has projected that they will produce about 1,400 barrels of •
beer or ale in. 1996.
. 2
The Zoning Code limits the floor area used for the brewing operation to 25% of the total floor
~ area of a brew pub. The existing brewing operation occupies 21% (1,000 sq.ft.) of the total floor
area and the proposed brewing operation will occupy 17% (1,087 sq.ft.) of the total floor area.
111. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR THIS REQUEST
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by the Town of Vait Municipal
Code. In addition to the Conditional Use criteria, staff has included criteria from the zoning code
and the Vail Comprehensive Plan, as we believe this will help the PEC in its evaluation of the
request.
A. THE TOWN OF VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE
The Hubcap Brewery is located in the Commercial Service Center (CSC) zone district. According
to Section 18.28.010 of the zoning code, the purpose of the CSC district is:
"to provide sites for general shopping and commercial facilities serving the town, together
with limited multiple-family dwelling and lodge uses as may be appropriate without
interfering with the basic commercial functions of the district. The commercial service
center district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities
appropriate to permitted types of buildings and uses, and to maintain a convenient
shopping center environment for permitted commercial." .
A brew pub which sells beer or ale at wholesale (or for consumption off-site) and outdoor dining
shall be permitted in the CSC zone district subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit in
~ accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60. For the PEC's reference, the Conditional Use
Permit purpose statement indicates that:
"in order to provide the flexibi(ity necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified
uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional use permit.
` Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so
that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with
respect to their affects on surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this
chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at large: Uses listed as
, conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and
limitations as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the
conditional uses will be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and
will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised,
to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permit shall be denied:"
B. VAIL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Several elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan indirectly address outdoor dining areas. The
relevant elements and sections are listed below.
1. Land Use Plan
4.3 The ambience of the Village is important to the identity of
. Vail and should be preserved.. Scale, alpine character,
small town feeling, mountains, natural setting, intimate size,
cosmopolitan feeling and environmental qualiry should all
be maintained or enhanced.
3
'
. ~
2. Vaii Village Master Plan
2.4 Objective: Encourage the development of a variety of new commerciat ~
activities that are compatible with existing land uses.
2.4.1 Policy: Commercial in-fill development consistent with established
horizontal zoning reguiations shall be encouraged to
provide activity generators, accessible green spaces, public
plazas, and streetscape improvements to the pedestrian
network throughout the Village. 2.4.2 Policy: Activity that provides nightlife and evening entertainment
for both the guest and the community shall be encouraged.
3.1 Objective: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by
iandscaping and other improvements.
3.1.1 Policy: Private development objectives shall incorporate
streetscape improvements such as paver treatments,
landscaping, lighting and seating areas along adjacent
pedestrian ways.
3.3 Objective: Encourage a wide variety of activities, events and street life
along pedestrian ways and plazas.
3.32 Policy: Outdoor dining is an important streetscape feature and
shall be encouraged in commercial in-fill or redevelopment ~
projects."
IV. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.60 of the Municipal Code, the Community Development Department
recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit request to allow for the expansion of the
Hubcap Brewery (a brew pub) which sells beer or ale at wholesale (or for off-site consumption)
and the outdoor dining area, Iocated at 143 East Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village; Fir.st Filing (Crossroads), based upon the following factors: .
A. CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of
the Town.
The proposal provides for the continued economic viability of a unique use within
the Vail Village area. The proposed outdoor dining promotes and implements
many of the policies of the Town by improving the streetscape and bringing
people into the Village.
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public facilities needs. .
The proposal creates active open space out of what is currently passive open
space. The proposal has no negative impacts on any of the above criteria.
. 4
~
3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive
~ and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control,
access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and
parking areas.
The proposal has no negative impacts on these items. The plans reflect
consideration for pedestrian access and maneuverability and snow storage and
removal. The proposal will not change the existing loading and delivery
requirements for this use.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in
relation to surrounding uses.
This proposal is in harmony with the character of the area. The outdoor seating
. implements several objectives and policies of the Town by encouraging
redevelopment, providing streetscape improvements, and bringing people to the
Village. The proposal does not increase the scale or bulk of the structure.
B. FINDINGS .
The Planninq and Environmental Commission shall make the followin.g findings before
granting a conditional use eA rmit; i
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes ~
~ of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes ~
of the district in which the site is located.
~
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it ~
, would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or !
improvements in the vicinity. ;
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable '
, provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends approval of this request. Staff finds that the applicanYs request
complies with aII of the above criteria and findings necessary for granting Conditional Use Permit
approval in the CSC zone district. Staff's recommendation for approval includes the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide a delivery service for any wholesale customers and
shall not aliow wholesale customers to pick up the product at the site.
2. The applicant shall not make deliveries more than once a week to wholesale
customers.
~ 3. The applicant shall conduct all deliveries via the existing toading dock.
, 4. The appticant shall not use any vehicle larger than a pick-up truck to make
deliveries.
5
?
~
i ~
~ 5. In order to meet the Town's parking requirements, the seating of the brew pub
shall not exceed 176 seats, unfess additional parking is pravided. .
6. No outdoor lighting or umbrellas for the exterior tables, shall be instafled without
Design Review Board approval.
f:leVeryone~pecVnemosU~ubcapcu.m25
~
.
6
-
~
. ¢
~
N IAND'G GARtON'J PK. LOt ~ Z
N
W
Q U
>
~ ~ i
- ~ I
~ c
" .
i• M - lHE OI' GRADE O I
" ~ MIDCAP GRlWERT Q
SAR GNTR~ qpy ppEMNG G1A39 UALL RElTAURAHI ENTRI I~I'-O' 'i
NN GP[MNG GLA99 OA(L W
J a
W m >
m N I
m ~ W i
m2LF- SOUTf-l ~~~V,4 TION Q
° a
0
J
9wADlD ARlA RlPRl9fMTS wRlA O/ iROP09lO RCAODlL J
L - wHDOU ram ro n~rcN exrs1MC I18" I-O" j vi > ~
Y
1. VATCN AND RFPMP 61M1E lTLCCD . T O=I
X1[R/OR UALL IINA4N t0 ITATCH CN~DT'G - y ~ a
3. HCU RAIMG AT OAR lN1RI TO MATCN lXUTMG RA/LMG U>
DAIEv )-H-N
TNIle 1,15
~ I PLOT gGA(lYpA)O].
IfHHDON 3C14EDl/LE
I I ~ 4~ O
w
FP II pq [411~ z
I ,1 I ~ Z
RETAIL LEVEL -
~
i . . L. _ . ~
. .
' £rthTfMi I • N 1 _ _ - <
}ti~ _INi. LAkOING EL
~ , .r
~T m
Ljj
G_~REmERI'
A D GRAOEJ ~ IY1'-0•
(GE-Dl
MAiCH DENOtE3 Ep9iM( RAILING 1 1 1
tRATS OR Nl~I ypIQK (DlMNDI w
~ U
i EAS T EL EVA TION ~ _
v8" _ P-o-- 0
T
Q
• • • ~ ~ '
i MSUE
W
OD
_ _ au..
'
waovmna nnr~xa I
.u xwcf ' I S-f
~ ~ «u.~ ~ ~ -
EXIST'G KITCHEN ~ ~ ~ N
<
p ~
w.,,, SEATIN
N
VJ
' ~ i
>
i
i " I H
~
< >
I' WAITRE95 PICK-UP 57ATION I
• i N4_15- 9A±MGAE I j U
W O
_ - ~ m m "Lw IUAIT/NG
; <
~ ~
6'6, - i ~ _
i M=pn
I [~LA$5 ENCLOSED ~ ~L?~ ~
t ^ 9REWING AREA
~ r
.
y4 ~ ENTR1'
~ h DOOR9
~ ; Q BR NG F
p y K AREA
f
91m. en rb. en,. ..u ( . .
I
~ I DN / if 1 j O
~
VE9TE~LE ~U ,4 P BR UI Y FL 00~' PL r4 N~ ~ z
~ ON CALE: 3/IL" = I'-O NORTH
BEATING CAPACITY: Z
i i
TABLE W/ Z SEAT$ 1$EAT ~ A\ Q
TADLF9 W/ 4 SEAT$ - 72 ,yEAt ~l/ J
- Mo~~c m_yGq x wu ~ TABLE3 Rf/ L SEA 73 - Sf 3EAT 1
B BOOTH9 W/ ! 5EAT9 - 30 SEAT 1 ^ d
W/ ED~ ~ IY 5EAT9 AT 7ME LAR - IL 3EA75 w w
?A'~~ ~
tOTAL SERT/NG CAPACITY L 17i SEATS ir
F-
W
roi11LAOp~^7' #ABLE SfZES SHOWN:
9EAT TABLE - 14• X 37' I I ..}3 ~
SEAT 7A8LE ~ 37' X -08' ~
9EA7 TAHLE - 32' x 72' , ~ • r-1 Z
3EAT 8007H -TY X 77' TI'P. O~ S~ f~ U
AR STOOl9/9EAT8 ~ I6'X IS' X41 ~ WGH CC
1 1 l
h 2
A 2 0 z
~ ~
~
~
•
MEMORANDUM
~
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: March 25,1996
SUBJECT: A request for a major exterior alteration in the Commercial Core II zone district for
a proposed building expansion at the Lion Square Lodge, Iocated at 660 West
Lionshead Place/Lot 1, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing, 1 st Addition.
Applicant: John Railton, representing the Lion Square Lodge Condominium
Association
Planner: Jim Curnutte
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
John Railton, on behali of the Lion Square Lodge Condominium Association, has requested
Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) review of a proposed major exterior alteration in
• the Commercial Core II (CCII) zone district, for a proposed building expansion at the Lion Square
Lodge (located at 660 West Lionshead Place/Lot 1, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing, 1 st Addition).
The Lion Square Lodge Condominium Association includes Phase I(east building), Phases II
and III (the south building) and Phase IV (north building, located on Parcel B, Part of Lot 8, Block
1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing). Overall, the Condominium Association is comprised of 124
condominium units. 97 of these units are located on Lot 1 with the remaining 27 units in Phase
IV, which is located north of Lionshead Place, on a different lot. In addition to the residential
uses, and common areas related to those residentiai uses, the buildings on Lot 1 also contain a
restaurant, a professional office, a retail space, and three meeting/conference rooms. The
applicant has stated that the existing lobby area was originally designed to serve Phases 1, II and
III only, however, with the addition of the Phase IV building to the Association, their lobby
facilities are inadequate, and in need of expansion.
The proposed building addition will include an expanded lobby area, a new reservation office and
- a new bellman's desk. The proposed addition is approximately 720 square feet in size and will
be located on the north side of the Lion Square Lodge, adjacent to the existing main entry to the
building. In addition to the proposed building expansion, the association is proposing to
rearrange the existing landscape planters on the plaza, resurtace the plaza with pavers that
match those used throughout the Lionshead Mall, remove a portion of the existing breezeway
overhang along the east side of the addition, and add one surface parking space to the property.
Although not part of this major exterior alteration application at this time, the Association is also
considering future interior alterations to their existing front desk and management offices.
•
r
/
il. BACKGROUND •
Phases I, II and HI of the Lion Square Lodge appear to have been constructed in the years 1970-
1972. The condominium plats for these buildings were recorded in 1971, 1972 and 1973,
respectively. In 1973, a parking variance was granted by the PEC to convert 12 enclosed
spaces in the parking structure into what is now known as the Wildwood Conference Room. At
that time, there were 46 parking spaces in the structure. At some later date, the Lion Square
Lodge converted 6 additional enclosed parking spaces into storage areas, leaving a total ofi 28
enclosed parking spaces today. As described further in this memorandum, staff is
recommending that the unauthorized storage areas be removed and converted back to parking
spaces. This will not only improve the property's parking nonconformity (in terms of numbers and
the enclosure requirement) but also its common area nonconformiry (by removing approximately
1,720 square feet of common floor area).
On February 13, 1995, the PEC approved Lion Square Lodge's request for a major exterior
. alteration in the CCII zone district and parking and common area variances for a lobby expansion
which was siightly larger, but very similar in design to the request being reviewed today. The
PEC approved the requests with five conditions. Since variance approvals are valid for a period
of two years from the date granted, there is no need to include requests for variances in the new
major exterior alteration application being reviewed by the PEC today.
On February 21, 1995, the Vail Town Council "called-up" the PEC's approval of the Lion Square
Lodge in order to review the approval. After considerable discussion, the Council members
decided to uphold the PEC's approval of the project.
On March 15, 1995, the Vail Design Review Board approved the project, with conditions. •
.
On April 4, 1995, the Town Council "called-up" the DRB approval of the project, and again after
considerable discussion, the Town Council decided to uphold the DRB's approval.
2 •
110 ZONtNG ANALYSIS
Zoning: Commercial Core II (CCII)
Lot Area: 1.8 acres or 78,416 square feet
Aliowed/Required Existing
b onin Develooment Progosed Develooment
Height': 45 feet for flat or mansard roofs Approximately 65 feet to ihe highest No changes proposed
48 feet for-a sioping roof point of the stair tower
Setbacks': 10 feet from all property lines N: 11 feet No changes proposed
S: 6 feet
E: 3 feet
W:1 foot
GRFA: 80% of buildable area or 62,733 sq. ft. 94% of site or 73,660 sq. ft. No changes proposed
Common Area: 35%0 of allowable GRFA or 21,957 sq. ft. 46.1 % of allowable GRFA or 28,917 sq. ft. 472 % of ailowable GRFA or 29,637 sq. ft.
Dweliing Units: 25 units per acre of buildable site area 81.5 units on Lot 1(66 DUs and 31 AUs) (Phases I, II R II) Na changes proposed
a 45 units for ihe site 27 units in Phase IV which is located on a differern lot
Site Coverage': 70% of the total site area or 54,891 sq. ft. 53.1 % of the total site area or 41,650 sq. ft. No changes proposed"
landscaping: 20% of the total site area or 15,683 sq.fl. 2320% of ihe total site area or 18,244 sq. ft. 242% of total site area or 19,000 sq. ft.
Parking"': 190 spaces required 94 parking spaces ( 66 surface spaces and 95 parking spaces ( 67 surlace spacas and
28 endosed spaces) 28 enclosed spaces)
Loading: 1 loading berth required No loading benhs currently exist No changes proposed
on the property
'These restrictions pertain unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan and Urban Design Considerations.
"Since the proposed lobby addition is being located directly above the Wildwood Conference Room, as well as above some housekeeping spaces, it will not increase the existing site coverage on the
ProPertY.
*"The total parking requirement for the current uses at ihe Lion Square Lodge is 201 spaces, however, a 59'o reduction in parking spaces is allowed for muhiple use parking facilities per Section
18.52.120 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. At least one-half of the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings. No parkin.g or loading may be located in any front setbadc
area. As this property is located in the CCII zone district, any new parking spaces that are generated as a resuh of the proposed building addition must be provided on-site, however, if the site is unable
to accommodate additional parking spaces, the applicant may pay into the Trnm of Vail Parking Fund. At this time, parking spaces are $16,333.38 each plus the percentage the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) of the City of Denver has increased over each successive year. At ihis time, the applicant is proposing to provide the one additional parking space required in conjunction with this building on the
property, however, if the Association chooses to pay into the Town of Vail Parking Fund at a later date, the amount of the fee will be determined based upon the parlcing fee that is in effect at the time that
a building permit is issued for the proposed addition.
Variance approved - February 1995
,
3
R
IV. CRITER{A TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL ~
A. rompliancp with the Commercial Core 11 Zone District PurRose tatement
As stated in the Zoning Code, the purpose of the CCII zone district is as follows:
' "The Commercial Core II District is intended to provide sites for a mixture
of multiple dwellings, lodges, and commercial establishments in a
clustered, unified development. Commercial Core II District in accordance
with the Vail Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan and Design .
Considerations is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and
, other amenities appropriate to the permitted rypes of buildings and uses
and to maintain the desirable qualities of the district by establishing
appropriate site development standards." •
. $taff ResRpnse•
Staff believes that the proposed addition to the Lion Square Lodge complies with the
purpose statement of the CCII zone district.
B. Compliance with the Urban Desian Guide Plan for Lionshead
The Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan identifies the right-of-way between Phases l, ll
and III and Phase IV as a major Lionshead Mall entry (southwest mall entry). The only
sub-area concept in the immediate vicinity of the proposed Lion Square Lodge is Concept
Number 29 (see Attachment #2 for a map of the area) which suggests: •
"Strong landscape planting to reinforce entry identity, with tree planters to
soften a{leyway and introduce meander to pathway."
Staff Response:
Staff believes that the applicant has adequately softened the appearance of the
pedestrian walkway along the northern side of Building 1 with the addition of a 3-foot wide
landscape planter. C. Comnliance with the Urban Desiyn Considerations for Lionshead and
Exterior Alteration Criteria
The following design considerations are critical elements of the Lionshead Urban Design
Guide Plan and provide the criteria to evaluate new proposals:
1. Height and Massing:
The Lionshead Design Guidelines focus primarily on the pedestrian mall and
encourage modest additions to create a ground level experience which would
attract attention away from the height and mass of many of the existing buildings
in order to overcome the "canyon" effect. According to the Lion Square Lodge's
architect, the proposed addition is one story high in order to respect the views •
from adjacent residential spaces and is oriented towards the point of automobile
access to the site.
4
i .
The Design Guidelines also encourage building additions to match the
architectural style of the existing building or buildings on the site so as to avoid a
patchwork, "tacked-on" appearance in Lionshead. The Guidelines state that all
~ expansions should appear to have been part of the original design of each
buitding: In this case, staff believes that the proposed building addition fits well
with the architecture and building materials of the existing building.
2. Roofs:
. The applicant is proposing a flat roof on a majority of the proposed building
addition, with a small sloping roof form on the east side. The flat roof will include
a large skylight in order to add additional light into the lobby area. The finish
material proposed for the flat roof is stone ballast, of a color to match the
proposed plaza pavers. The sfoping roof will be finished with cedar shingles to
match a!I other sloped roofs on the existing building. The applicant has stated
that there will be no mechanical equipment located on the roof of the proposed
building addition.
The Lionshead Urban Design Considerations state that flat, shed, vaulted, or
dome roofs are acceptable for building expansions. The Design Guidelines also
state that most existing building roofs in Lionshead are too high to be seen, but
where they are highly visible from the ground, such as the Lion Square Lodge
Condominiums, proposed building expansions should match the existing roof
pitch. Staff believes that the proposed flat roof lobby addition, with a pitched roof
• element on the east side is in character with the existing building and will be an
improvement to the north side of the building.
3. Facades - Walls/Structures:
The proposed building addition will displace the current "trellis" and timber
planters which are located on the piaza, in front of the existing lobby. The
applicant points out that this addition greatly improves the visibility of the main
entry, which is currently recessed and difficult to locate for those not familiar with
the facility.
The exterior finish materials of the proposed addition include stucco, to match the
texture and color of the stucco on the existing building. The fascia of the iobby
extension will be redwood boards, painted brown to match the rest of the building.
The soffit above the lobby entrance will be finished with exterior grade gypsum
- board. The doors on the west and east sides of the addition, as well as a majority
of the windows, will be a bronze colored anodiied aluminum. Those windows
which are located in the stucco walls are proposed to be metal clad wood, of a sand color. The iobby wiH be brightly lit with recessed fights in the soffit to identify
the building entry and to invite guests into the hotel. The walkways leading
around the proposed addition will be lighted by low level ground lights recessed
into the building and landscape planters.
~
5
M
4. Facades - Transparency:
Staff believes that this particular design criteria has more relevancy to the more •
pedestrian oriented areas of the Lionshead Mall. However, as it relates to this
property, staff feels comfortable with the ratio of glass area to stucco wall being
proposed, as well as the window pattern itself.
~ 5. Decks and Patios:
. Staff believes that the existing plaza area currently exhibits an uninviting and
barren appearance. The proposed lobby addition, which will include new
i landscape planters and ptaza pavers, will greatly improve the appearance of ttiis
portion of the property. The proposed plaza pavers will match those used in the
Lionshead Mall and witl be heated. The plaza pavers wili be carried ali the way
through the breezeway, which runs between Buildings 1 and 2. The applicant has
undulated the northern edge of the plaza in order to provide a softer transition to
the landscape island to the north, than currently exists.
6. Accent Elements:
The only significant accent elements proposed in conjunction with the building
addition are the skylight on top of the flat roof and the new flagpole at the lobby
entrance. Staff believes that these features add an interesting element to the
addition. Although the landscape plan indicates that a ski storage rack is
proposed to be placed along the easternmost landscape planter during the winter
months, no information has been provided to review its design. Staff recommends •
that the specifics related to the proposed ski rack (materials, color, etc.) be
submitted for review by the Design Review Board.
7. Landscape Elements:
Although the applicant is proposing to remove a number of landscape planters
~ located on the existing plaza, the overall amount of landscape planting area on
the properry will increase with, the new proposal. New landscape planters are
proposed to be added to the north side of the building addition, along the west
side of Building 1 and alang the north side of Bui{ding 1(in the area of the gondola
' pedestrian access way). Additionally, the existing landscape planter north of the
plaza will be expanded to the south, reducing the excessive amount of plaza area
and providing a more pleasing atmosphere in the area. The wall surrounding this
expanded landscape area will include a buitt-in wood bench. All new landscape
planter and site walls will be faced with brown granite and have a sandstone cap.
As indicated on the iandscape pfan, some of the proposed shrubs are 1 gallon in
size. The minimum size of shrubs, according to the Town's Design Guidelines, is
5 gallons. Staff recommends that the PEC increase the size of all proposed
, shrubs to 5 gallon containers.
•
6
Due to problems with the Association covenants, the applicant is unable to convey
a formal pedestrian easement to the Town, for the walkway north of Building 1, as
requested by staff, PEC and DRB during the review of the previously approved
building expansion application. However, they have agreed to sign a letter of
a reement to allow for the continued use of the property as a public pedestrian
9
' way.
8. Service and Delivery:
Although the applicant is not proposing to add additional loading berths in
~ ct o , proposed lobbY addition will
con'un i n with this addition staff believes that the
have a positive effect on service and delivery. Currently, large delivery vehicles
park in the access aisleways in order to deliver goods to the front door of the
building, which on occasion, biocks traffic. The proposed addition will include a
flare to the existing driveway leading to the lobby, which will allow delivery
vehicles to park and unload without blocking existing aisleways.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the major exterior alteration application. Staff believes that the
applicant has shown that the proposed addition has been designed to blend well with the overall context of the existing building and that the proposed addition complies with the criteria identified
in the Lionshead Urban Design Considerations. We feel that the proposed lobby expansion is
• necessary for the appropriate functioning of the Lion Square Lodge and that the addition of one
surface parking space is not detrimental to the property as a whole. Staff is recommending the
following conditions be attached to the approval of this project:
1. That the Lion Square Lodge Condominium Association remove the unauthorized
conversion of six enclosed parking spaces into storage areas. Converting the
storage areas back to parking spaces will bring the property further into
conformance with the Zoning Code by increasing the number of parking spaces,
increasing the percentage of enclosed parking spaces, and decreasing the
amount of common floor area fiound on the property.
2. That'the applicant provide staff and DRB with a detailed explanation as to how the
existing trees in the area of the new parking space will be protected and
guarantee their survival for a period of finro years after construction. '
3. That prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Lion Square Lodge
Condominium Association shall sign a letter of agreement authorizing the
continued public use of the walkway north of Building 1.
4. That all shrubs proposed to be installed on the Lion Square Lodge property be 5
gallons or larger.
5. That details related to the proposed ski storage rack be presented and approved
by the Design Review Board, prior to its installation.
•
7
P~~~+ g 04°35'58" E- 4.00
„ ~ g1.89 . ~
. N 6-~Jz 09 /itRC -"D>CWCR 44Y~ ~
P k. TK
wA:L rF':CE '.~~...065' \ . s \
~ ` S SO.
r~ ~ 2
~ 1• ` k • s ~3p' °i~ti~~ ~ `
or ~
y-~ ' , i j ? w~ .~a.c T«e us~ s~~c w~~
~>PER LC 'JCCKS
"'El
Ez~51 A 80VE ~O S~OS) IOS
/ (SWC SIIL AS O
°,~e0)' q) I
C9Gf OF~rPtO'MfD 3c
y iMKWG lOT ~.r I
< < "n
. ~nj~',~ ~~ic ~1 o,.,w,~.o`~~' c• ~e~~: I
ssr
/ r D , I
y JtLpUV1E4wCD
ee~:vu
V,
`1~~~,.~~r ~j2 rz~. • ' r 5s Q
0
} „e• y cc:c or vLowco.
.
SEwCR M-NNOLC (n
41~~ I
p ~ (~~-.1 ~ 1\ ,!,'~a~ i.
P
R.R tIt ,~R• f 1 ' : s.rc ~
~
v1NiEa5~ ,1 ~ i \ ~cr:6;9:.: ~'h~i`^ .
w.owto t
E~ct <u+c ~ol 1 ..u ~ ~ +t
~ `_~•~~T ' ~ ~ ~ j. i ~d$ 1 SE'NER 1d:
toNt van.-~ aiv [~~Ei
5i5 OF
z,
:IRE N1DPA'If ~ ~17~ " ~~i-r.r~ f.~. ? 0~ :CNC. Q
xs.L N
rtocK ar
01'
a~.
' cnnc,
~ppntw~r..r 1 „ [n" c . • 7~i j..,l~ ~~ro ~ ~a~+::"< a q e0 C? r~„v
1 MMP ~ rr. wcn } y ~J ~•j U~ r . ~ E`3 _ T ~ ~z;~au" _'`:gE•~:~ -~.4 A e
z>ntic~_-.:^.`r=- : ~ y y A twT,
~j 4 _•,Yy... ir.T a a ~ . f~ r.. a' v e~
°i: 07
~4y^-Ix tip.a'i'~ . • j~ ~C~ ',a
0^i' w~ L.)•,C M~L: - ~ ~vW a~:.
~ t x F. ' y: a,'~,e..
p~lA'i? j } J
iEE DE+a::>•~. ? ~r'Yi f
~ ;',4 G~`~2c~c=•.Y j~,/ . : ? ~ ~•',,N
f
0)
l~
Y
~ / A ' .
er~ , • . `m, v . ~ 132.00 ^ .~n
) Jr w.. `d`°' S$6ecJ~'45 W ~<+'3
na'
c~n~~ ov "O~
veefa LEVEL. oEGk" p ~
r.=cc s•-" s'• - N
E t:e
SE' 0E11_e
or ~ o ~ovE° : Et OE'xi W-G
~~«i5 9Lw.~r~Gi
s,':C
f Wn '"E ov ~ 9
~rw a:uu.; o i,' • . . - w ~ . . . • .
ucvc~~ ee:K . ~ ~s~,''.~s cn . : ii5,:86~:. :il::~:i%~... cur,:hen<<v
~,y.. .
0 6 ' . '
:e~~~
i/~ V ~ %"L_:.~::u 5 03°08'17" F_ a nn
' / _ 5:~, - ~ r^~
5t'43 W~ 172.00 l!
~ r
j ? - ~ ~ ~
c,4
M
4 : `5'4; . . • ~ t
• ~a~,~--" ' I
~ . . wR~asv'w' • }
. ~ i~ + ~.e~ rioe• ~ f - ••"st~.. T• I
^ . . ~ Mk14?.u~RM ) . '
v
" ~ .,.R. ; ws: ` . f ,
I WeW ~
~ .r "-'f /
00
rr
~ • ~
~ :.,.ry
~ , , ~ •
~ . TW ON Om MM'(
~ ~tw
f
Fki ~ ~ a1
wilu- "mi~
. , ~ 14111 . mi,
~
,
WIM'µ W ~l1~G .
~
~
• ~.''u. ~ ~ ~
I p~~
. ~;,,M.zd-d. ;
~
~<<
~1(15TNG nv~cvldG • 'AAItiON~tEtOY .
IXKi7'ING I..`blDSCAVfi ~ ~ ~ e~ r ~ 1 t 7 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 'r'
r~ + ~
~ ~ Mrw Ar~a• ww
fJfl~DTRl~ /~SP~ 1Rl1 soD i
tJ GRO~P ov Q RlDnA6 aaLHOap -f u~-. i
~ 4 I~urM!
~eo~`. ~c ( , ' ~
, ~sxrom+~ ~W.or I
I HGKMtNT ACtoM
4 ~
~ ~Dr Lw PAM* .v.Tbii% Sam _ .~~iper ,
SP ,4G, „O,,,ID Wi g A_ s. ,o tW
3 GROVP9 OR pq,`OSi1tAT74 .JUI.JIPlR, LA6N W - 1 GAI..OR 'SI '
nMMh- 2 Or RtCrwK DeGG40vP
~ ~1 ~ asar 'ctrfW or 7 - /6M..
2@ WOOO ~ 1 + J~ ~ J ~
fI1tbOi DU1
• Mvlac a~Nwuwa 3'-+1 ++aw w/jr
lO7J~
ARE^ \ e K14M Wf t- IGM.. oR 15' .
Mr uati9 ~ 6 ORWM OK ,4D'twt6 Opswom
C~. C~~ f? TT.ft~ oR ZS - 1IPAL.
YIXIliAJ6 GtRI~tRFL I yy w•uu. ..1... V AaNaW PK^"ATAiftAW
~
~ N€W PAViP RA?A (~~E $'o~~ " ~
yND u/ gryoYMiL7 ~ '
~ ti'd`
~
r - ~ • ~
tb R}a'
1 ~ } 9dROi+?S Or PRO5fRA7A .NM/r6t
New
l~ ` p~' BJ1cN4 - /law.alI6' ~
ROUF A:t \ ' y } ) '4 ) ~ , yy~. ~ ~ 1 2- omum ef ft.'Diuaf. Aps4naD ~
/ / ~ • -•.c ~ ~ ' : •''C ~ '[bTkM L'F B - 1 RAI-.
l
Hraie
Ac++ p.Krrev nkok m
ft RXa'.N a SLVAA469k qauiRc Rnr+tm e. f9x
~ paw"Pl s/1AVS3.
' ~j410T146 4.~ ~
ft°Oi`imsa~__ JR
NEW PPDMoN r r~~ ~
Nsw tMµ(ub O fP1RtY1lL ~ E~s1i6 , am esr.c ~ 5M!" w+w r ww
~ ~ ~ • Pl
roa ~ flP?~ PJWi10.--T ' -
. ~YISYMdG B~7/LAFK' '
?J0-MS Otz AF2EAS. Q
0
f'AvM> .R&A. s so .
n uarosenvr Aazv. 1850, 1750
purtyr&lG !WD« go trur.w.«.waw.w,r
pROP oR" NtIN 20L
-tOS11L 3100 57clO
96 ~i«~~w~
~ ~ ~MMtM .
~
Ev~r '
pAtttON~lk
,
6 6 ~ ~
O~
i
or or ~ .
• Q. ' s~
` ~ - poKC ~ w y
1 r t -ro Ot
r1 r-p`ygt- ~ o~b I'~~ i AowN~'"k~L,ya. s; •A~
o A ~
~ 4++ b
~ M F2 T ~
' io~ VO o~ ~3 Q
~
n ~ -9 ~ J~~ WrtX
A ~
OF~ ~ i0 . •d~
m ~
~ ~ a .ve - ~ - _
t..str~*?p m ~y°'"~'"' `r~'r~
M
WPtY
htR'MI 'NkLt-
~ ~Y
I ~A,N F`~ p1.,pN
I
~
_ . M~t?'6" rS/4 ~ . ' .
Rlr
I
.JrfTlkv . R1ALT~VY R'~ , . • i ~ • ~ ~
i~y~G~rr~yK.cxc R~GA'
'er oe O
O
MCr4 4.1001aS ' 'Fc1.il y i f~ ~
ur
NpRTN Ek.EVATI4N Z
S `«'+v •
00
H.
.
. ' r .IR
~ . . y0.vaoK
. ' . , . ~ ~ ~ • ` .
. . . • i ~ ~ . ~
3t ~
L~.,-~~' ~ ~~,w~~ .
• • W/•qM ~ 4pMrti
i ~ • . 111;V~`.`~.`~,. ~Y 1'1 . / ^ + i.r^r"'.~.wMwti. ~
M~~ ' ~ • t~ ~s .~.Nw^'"~r~.rrw
- - , E[.EVATlON
1NEST ~ -
EAST El-~A710N •
.
,ze++~ 4~ .
~t
~ ~ Sui:61RD LODGE ~ ~;r
~~i L~;.i.~ •T~:~`_,..,...
i
~~i .
• ~ .~-7 .
I) R~ . . . ~ r~ , • t~t ~ `Y'~._~..~-.i~,~
-A h~ ][j.~~• i (i- .~y _ e~'~i~ • ; r.~ ~ ~ ~~..j f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
•4 ~ . ;L-' ` F ti-.~. j ' t..~ Y 1 .a.?
P F ~-i ~ ~ ' ~ ' .f' t~~~ r' ( ~
• ' ~
y. .
•N ' , . ~+?~rJ,1t . . ~ ~ ; r , . • 1 ~ b~y~ . ~
1 ~ • ~ , i
{ ~ ; :s 1 ~ ~ ~
.
i
.
~ , . a .
, ~ . , , , • ' `I r. fi~~
\
1 \
j ' ~y~~,~,I , ~_l , ~~r ~A :1~, y ' . ~ \
~ ` ~l ~..r'(s'j`' . ~ , ~I ~ 7 j•~ ~ .11,`~.. . , tt ' 1 '`'~fi ~ ' N~`~\\ ~
~ +Z'~~4~ • ~ ' f ~ ~ , I
I ~"'~,a"~• ir j ; ~
~!i r ~J• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I l.i.~l`.UV ,
t. , ,
~
f I
r~`r~r-'-~
• ; . .
uERVICt CG
, T_1 Z uF3T ti(=tD ~
~I~ ,h ' ~f~r ••l•• ~ ~ '
a t~~~~ .''i; ~<<i~ . a.•~~`~' I I I
L I ~ M .~..t •.J ( I
; ' ' ! 1~
. . L.~ .
~ LC1 i ~ • • r, • ~ _
. (
~-1~L!~lJ~
~ f 1~
~ ~~i~ i ~ • I/,; ~ /'%/'~~r • ,`~MCk..~r~CY ~ .
A cE~.S,~
uon, SouAFcE
. . ~ _ „ ~ S' ~ w ~ . • rl ~~~I.
/ `iyM} ' ~ ~ t~i •
~ ' I+;•'*1~' M ry, un+'~ n~i, i
/ p' ,u~.Il~a.. 1~A•~~.~ , ,~`:~~i~ .~~n i -
'
. SOUTN7N -SY ~ .
MALL RY ~ +:1»'~'li~~,r,"
/ L i k 1p~`I'~~;~'', y; Id~~• ± K .:"".i . n!.`.
' ~.~•71
r ,~~i ~1~ : • •
j ~ ,,,~yY'7~~~Y.hl~.~r, I~'~:: •vr~iiqt:;.~,:o.
` - / . ~ tN~~lll~l (Ii~ ~ M'~illt .n•
/ 1 ' ~ I~w I 9 4d~n •,pr~ * qn.,Tt !h1 4.
~ h.µl~ !~..A,.~';~1,~,1:,,~,.;,ti. ,.t.
r
~ .
ATTACHMENT It
o~
~ Yw w• •
I ` ^ APPIOTffi~ ~ 8 06
' PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
• March 25, 1996
Minutes
I MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT:
Greg Moffet Mike Mollica
Greg Amsden Dominic Mauriello
Henry Pratt Jim Curnutte
Kevin Deighan George Ruther
Gaten Aas(and Judy Rodriguez
Diane Golden _
Gene Uselton
Public Hearina 2:00 p.m.
Greg Moffet called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion
to an existing duplex residence located at 1415 Westhaven/Lot 52, Glen Lyon. -
Applicant: Neil Sirotkin, represented by David Irwin ~
Planner: George Ruther
• Greg Amsden abstained from voting. I
George Ruther gave an overview of the staff memo and stated that staff recommended approval
of the request for an additional 226 sq. ft. being added to the residence. Staff felt that the
Findings had been met and suggested that the approval carry with it the condition (isted on page ~
4 of the memo.
Greg Moffet asked if the applicant was present.
The applicant was not present.
Greg Moffet asked for any public input.
Rivers Jardis, owner of the other half of the duplex residence at 1415 Westhaven Drive, was not
in favor of a carport, and stated that there are no earports in the neighborhood. Her other
concern was topography. In order to push further to the south, a great deal of excavation would
be needed to hold up ihe wafl. She mentioned that drainage from the south came onto her
property. Rivers said the Sirotkins were not the tidiest people and did not maintain the
landscaping. Their property is an eyesore to the neighborhood. She gave an example that the gazebo for their hot tub, on the deck, has been damaged by snow that fell from the roof. The
gazebo is now a pile of lumber. Rivers is concerned about the appearance of a non-enclosed
addition; that it will not be maintained.
~ Ptanning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
March 25, 1996 1
' Galen Aasland had no problem with the carport, since ii is aliowed within the zoning. He does
I~ have a problem with the landscaping. Galen feels the carport should be sheitered more on the
south side. The landscape plan needs to be approved. He asked George Ruther if the
landscaping needs to be approved by the neighbors?
George Ruther said it is Duplex Zoned and he hasn't seen the covenants; whether adjacent
property owners need to approve the landscaping. The Zoning Code does not require adjacent
property owner approval.
Rivers Jardis said adjacent property owners do need to give their approval.
Galen Aasland would like to see irrigation on the south side to support the trees.
Diane Golden said an automatic sprinkler might be the answer.
Rivers Jardis said they have an automated sprinkler system, but they don't turn it on.
Kevin Deighan asked if the applicant was present. He was not. He thought, with the empty
space above the garage, that we should grant the additiona1250 now. His other concern was
the retaining wall. Kevin feels that the street will not be held up.
George Ruther said that was a problem identified by Public Works. At the time of the application,
the applicant didn't have a current survey. The question is whether the retaining walls are going
to work.
~ Diane Golden asked what would keep it from falling into the carport.
George Ruther said installing a new retaining walf which wi(I cut deeper into the hillside.
Rivers Jardis asked if a bigger wall would be running east to west. If so, it will have to be huge.
George Ruther said the wall would not exceed 3' in height.
Greg Moffet explained that if it was needed to be bigger, they would have to tier the hillside. -
Gene Uselton asked if this application would negatively impact the adjacent property owners.
George Ruther said that no adjacent property owners had come forward with complaints.
Rivers Jardis asked what the process was to make adjacent properry owners aware that they
might be negatively impacted.
George Ruther said this meeting was where objection could be heard and that it was published
and a copy of the public notice went out to all adjacent property owners.
Rivers Jardis stated that she was at a party Friday night and that none of the neighbors received -
a notice. All the neighbors are against the carport. The Rays never received a notice.
George Ruther said the Rays were notified at a Littleton, Colorado address.
~ Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
March 25, 1996 2
i
Rivers Jardis asked if the PECs decision wouid be the final say.
~ Henry Pratt said there was an appeals process for Rivers Jardis to pursue. He questioned staff ~
whether new evidence couid be introduced during an appeals process?
Mike Mo!lica said additional letters would not be a significant factor, since we are hearing
complaints today.
Greg Moffet said it might be adequate to show negative impact; maybe enough to deny approval. Galen Aasland asked George Ruther if the steep part of the hill faces south. Galen feels that
there is not enough landscaping to shelter the carport trom the street.
George Ruther stated the applicant is proposing to add new trees on the west side of the
property as shown on the proposed plans.
Galen Aasland said the south side is his concern.
Diane Golden asked if carports are permitted in Town?
Mike Maliica stated for the record, that the Design Guidelines allow carports and there is nothing
in the code that prohibits them.
Diane Golden said that was too bad.
Henry Pratt said he had no feeling either way about the carport, but the gas meter inside the
carport may be unsafe. lncreasing the size of the driveway also increases the runoff. Henry
•
doesn't think the retaining waii will work and the applicant is not here to address these issues.
He doesn't want to propose conditions with an approval if the applicant is not present.
George Ruther explained that the Building Permit issuance will address the meter location issue
and whether it needs to be moved. We have requested a current survey which will address the
retaining walls.
Kevin Deighan suggested tabling this item until the current survey is done. A 3' foot retaining
walf will not be adequate. We are not getting the whole picture at this time.
Galen Aasland asked if the applicant had to be present?
Mike Mollica looked up the 250 code and noted that adjacent property owners do not have a right
to appeal.
Greg Moffet reminded everyone that a carport is a permitted use. The Nuisance Ordinance deals
with messy neighbors. I would vote in favor of the application as iong as provisions were made
for a serious review by the DR6.
Henry Pratt made a motion that the request be approved with the conditions proposed by staff
and the with an additional condition that the DRB look carefully at the land drainage, retaining
walls and the location of the gas meter.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes ~
March 23, 1996 3
I ~ The motion was seconded by Kevin.
Henry Pratt reminded everyone that if the gas meter is knocked over by a car, then the
neighbors would be impacted.
Greg Moffet said if the appiicant changes the pian to meet code, the PEC won't see it again, but
the DRB will.
Galen Aasland asked if Henry Pratt would amend the motion to include the south side of the lot
' be adequately screened.
Henry Pratt said he would amend his motion to include landscaping on the south and west for the
purposes of screening.
Diane Golden said she doesn't see a carport working. ~
The amended motion was seconded by Kevin Deighan.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-1-1, with Diane Golden opposing and Greg Amsden
abstaining.
2. A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of the Hubcap Brewery
(a brew pub) and for an outdoor dining area (ocated at 143 East Meadow Drive/Tract P,
Block 5D, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
• Applicant: Lance Lucey
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
Dominic Mauriello gave an overview of the request. He stated that the applicant needs to
increase parking by three spaces and that the applicant submitted a restriping plan to meet the
requirement for parking. The proposal will convert some "softscape" to "hardscape" which is
allowed by the code. Staff has recommended approval with 6 conditions. Condition 1-4 are
existing conditions from the previous appiication.
Greg Moffet asked if the applicant had anything to add.
Lance Lucey, owner, and Bill Pierce, architect for the Hubcap, had nothing to add.
Gene Uselton asked about the safety of people sitting on the deck. He heard about a truck going
down the slope into This Wicked West area a while ago.
Brian Lefay, General Manager of the Hubcap, said the truck that rolled was not manned at the
time of the accident, and came down the street from the Frontage Road.
Diane Golden ihought boulders lining the street might prevent that from happening.
Lance Lucey mentioned that the entire location is being considered for upgrading and he doesn't
want to have to redo the landscaping twice.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
March 25, 1996 4
• ,
I
' Diane Golden asked what the time frame was for redoing the area.
I Biil Pierce said he does not know when that wiil happen. The truck rolling into the deck was an ~
odd accident. We can't prevent this from happening.
I Gene Uselton had no further comments.
Diane Golden had no comments.
Henry Pratt stated that the fenestration is being changed to al(ow customers to sit close to the
windows. A freak accident might jeopardize the safety of the people inside the buiiding.
~ BiH Pierce said it is understood that we are over ihe allowed uses of parking on the site. However, only three more spaces are required which they wiii comply with.
.
Mike Mollica said Gartons has valet parking when their deck is in use. The restriping being
proposed will comply with code.
i
Henry-Pratt asked what will happen with fhe existing manholes?
Bill Pierce said that they would remain, but be lowered.
Galen Aasland asked if the tables and umbrellas would be consistent with everything on site?
I Galen Aasland has concerns witti landscaping by the new front deck. The applicant is replacing
softscape with hardscape. Under the 3.1.1 policy, he would (ike to see a bench and more
landscaping at the front by the doub(e gate, instead of a fence. • i
Bi11 Pierce stated that the inside patio wall would be stucco.
Galen Aasland asked if the applicant would entertain a retaining wall and bench instead of the
stucco?
Bill Pierce thought they could just make the planter longer to the west.
Kevin Deighan agrees with Gene Uselton to place boulders along the southeast portion of the
property. Perhaps the landlord would kick in to help with the expense.
Bill Pierce said additional boulders near the sidewalk would require a right-of-way permit.
Dominic Mauriello said the applicant has about a foot of space on their property, however, he
doesn't think it would be a problem with Public Works granting the right-of-way permit.
Kevin Deighan wou(d like to see white wire mesh furniture and consistent canvas "markeY'
umbrelias with no advertising. Both this body and the DRB are not allowing advertising on the
umbrelfas. Kevin asked if the applicant was proposing to carry over the same canvas awning on
the southwest, as is now on the southeast?
Greg Amsden asked staff why the Zoning Code calls out production limits?
Planning and Environmental Cotnmission
Minutes
March 25, 1996 5
I . , . .
Dominic Mauriello stated the reason is it would be more like a restaurant with a brew pub as an
• accessory use. Delivery truck restrictions keep it more on a restaurant scale, rather than a
brewing plant.
Greg Amsden said that the applicant is taking away landscaping and replacing it with hardscape.
He agrees with the need to have boulders and more landscaping. Landscaping will invite people
to come in. He encourages the applicant to do hillside landscaping. Greg also stated that there
is (imited parking for the whole complex.
Lance Lucey said there have been a lot of tradeoffs with the inside space for overall
improvements. The outside area by Denim and Silk has never been maintained.
Greg Amsden said a right-of-way permit application is not a 4 month process.
Mike Mollica said staff needs to confer with the Town Engineer, Greg Hall, and then Dominic
Mauriello can sign off on it within a matter of days.
. Greg Moffet shares concerns with the other commissioners regarding the bare hillside. The area
does not need 12' pine trees, but rather shrubs to compliment the facility. It would also shield the
patrons from looking out at the underside of cars.
Gafen Aasland made a motion for approval with the conditions as listed on page 5 and 6 of the
staff memo. He added that umbrellas, tables, chairs and the canopy need to be consistent. That
landscaping of the right-of-way be approved by the Town (revocable ROW permit) and approved
by the DRB. He wants more landscaping on the southeast and southwest entrances. Also, no
advertising on the umbrellas.
• Gene Uselton seconded the motion.
Mike Mollica stated that prior to a Building Permit, a revocable ROW permit shail need to be +n
place, not prior to DRB approval.
The motion was so amended by Galen Aasland. .
The amended motion was seconded by Gene Uselton.
Kevin Deighan wanted mesh tables and market type umbrellas added to the motion.
Galen Aasland amended the motion.
Mike Mollica said staff would work it out with Greg Hall, so vehic(es are not launched by.the
boulders.
Gene Usefton seconded the amended motion.
The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0 subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide a delivery service for any wholesale customers and
shall not allow wholesale customers to pick up the product at the site.
~ Planning and Enviroumental Commission
~ Minutes
March 25, 1996 6
I
' 2.The applicant shail not make deliveries more than once a week to wholesale
customers. ~
I 3. The applicant shall conduct ail deliveries via the existing loading dock.
4. The applicant sha!l not use any vehicle larger than a pick-up truck to make
~ deliveries.
5. In order to meet the Town's parking requirements, the seating of the brew pub
shall not exceed 176 seats, unless additional parking is provided.
6. No outdoor lighting or umbrellas for the exterior tabies, shall be installed without
Design Review Board approval.
7. Umbrellas, tables, chairs, and awnings piaced on site shall be individually
~ consistent with respect to materiai and color. Tables shall be white metal tables.
~ 8. Enter into a revocable right-of-way permit with the Town in order to place boulders
and landscaping along the south frontage of the existing This Wicked West and
existing outdoor seating area prior to obtaining a building permit.
I
9. Add landscaping at the proposed gated entrance to the proposed outdoor dining
~ area.
I 10. If umbrellas are used they shall be market canvas umbrellas without advertising.
Greg Moffet reminded the applicant ihat if Greg Half says no boulders, then they need to address • I
landscaping for safety concerns.
3. A request ior a Major Exterior Alteration in the CClf zone district to af{ow for a lobby
expansion at the Lion Square Lodge located at 660 W. Lionshead Place/ Lot 1, Vail-
Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Lion Square Lodge Condominium Association, represented by John Railton
Planner: Jim Curnutte
Jim Curnutte explained what the applicant would like to do. This request is similar to the
previous proposal, however scaled back from the original last year. The previous variance approvals that were granted last year are still valid, since they are good for two years. Jim
directed the PEC to review the criteria and stated that this request was in compliance. Jim
stated that the landscaping, decks and patios are an improvement to an area that is currently
barren. Staff thinks this application carries out all of the elements required for major exterior
alterations and recommends approval with the five conditions as listed on page 7 of the memo.
Greg Moffet asked the applicant if there was anything to add.
Plannittg and Environmental Commission
Minutes ~
March 25, 1996 7
John Railton, the architect, along with Jim Turner representing the Management and the
~ Association of the Lion Square Lodge stated that they wanted the addition to relate as much as
possible to the existing building. The two new elements introduced are stone walls and the
pavers that will be used in ihe plaza area.
Greg Moffet asked for any public comment, however ihere was none.
Galen Aasland noted that the first condition that staff recommended was important to return the
six parking spaces back into parking spaces. Galen had no interest in the access agreement
condition, but will go with it if the rest of the commissioners feel strongly about it.
John Railton said the roof would be sandstone ballast and copper.
Galen Aasland said he would like to see stone facing on the building, to be wainscoting 24" high.
Kevin Deighan asked if all buildings would be painted the same color.
John Railton said yes, and they would match the colors that were formerly approved.
Jim Turner also agreed that they would all match.
Kevin Deighan also would like to see the removal of the storage area and the six parking spaces
be restored. Greg Amsden had no comments, but stated he likes what the applicant is proposing.
. Gene Uselton asked where all the water will go given the heated pavers and no specific plan for
drainage?
John Railton stated that there was a pitch for drainage.
Diane Golden said the proposal was a nice improvement.
Henry Pratt had no comment.
Greg Moffet disagrees with Galen Aasland regarding the fascia improvements. It is more
appropriate for DRB to review.
Kevin Deighan made a motion for approval in accordance with the staff inemo and the five
conditions, with one amendment, that the conversion of the unauthorized storage area be
converted back to parking spaces before a Building Permit is issued.
Henry Pratt seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0.
Greg Amsden made a motion to table items No. 4, No: 5, and No. 6 until April 8, 1996.
Henry Pratt seconded the motion.
so Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
March 25, 1996 8
' it passed unanimously.by a vote of 7-0.
4. A request for a Front Setback Variance and a request to utilize the 250 Ordinance to
allow for a garage and a Type I EHU to be constructed at 1464 Aspen Grove Lane/Lot 10,
Block 2, Lions Ridge Filing No. 4.
i I Applicant: Carrol Orrison, represented by Tom Braun
P(anner: Mike Moltica
TABLED UNTIL APRI! 8,1996
5. A request for a Minor SDD amendment to allow for streetscape improvements to the
Cascade Vil(age Subdivision entrance located at 1300 Westhaven Drive/Intersection of
Westhaven Dr. and South Frontage Road.
Applicant: L-O Westhaven Inc., represented by Skip Behrhorst
~ Planner: Randy Stouder
TABLED UNTIl. APRIL 8, 1996 '
6. A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion
~ to an existing residence located at 802 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 4, Block 1, Potato Patch.
Applicant: Padraic Deighan, represented by Steve Riden
Planner: Randy Stouder
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 8,1996
•
7. Information Update
8. Approval of March 11, 1996 PEC minutes.
Gene Uselton had two changes on page 6 of the minutes.
Gene Uselton made motion for approval of the minutes as changed.
Kevin Deighan seconded the motion.
lt passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0.
Kevin Deighan made a motion to adjourn the meeting.
Henry Pratt seconded the motion.
!t passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0.
The meeting adjourned at 3:25 p.m.
~
. Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
March 25,1996 9