HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-0520 PEC ~
i
4
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR RROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTlCE
~ NOTICE IS HEREBY GlVEN that the Pianning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail
will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town
of Vail on May 20,1996, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of:
A request for a Conditional Use Permit in the CCII Zone District to allow for a miniature golf course
to be located at 600 Lionshead Mall/Lot 4, Block 1, Vaif Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Charlie Alexander
Planner: Jim Curnutte
A request for an interior residential addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at
100 East Meadow DriveNitlage Inn Plaza Phase III, Unit 111/1-ot 0, Block 5D, Vail Village ist Filing.
_ Applicant: Tom Thornburg
Planner: Lauren Waterton
A request to modify a condition of approval for a conditional use permit for volleyball courts to be
located by the soccer field, located at 620 Vail Valley Drive/Tract A, Block 2, Vail Village 7th filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District
Planner: George Ruther
A request for a Conditional Use Permit to use a tent at the Lionshead Ski School for Camp Vail,
located at 520 Lionshead Mall/ Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st filing ~
~ Applicant: Vail Recreation District
Planner: Jim Curnutte
A request for a Sign Code Amendment to allow for an amendment and reorganization of Title 16,
Signs, Chapters 16.20 (Sign Categories) and 16.22 (Sign Categories for the CC3 and ABD Zone ;
Disi(cts).
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD
for information.
Communiry Development Department
Published May 3, 1996 in the Vail Trail.
~
~
~
THfS lTEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
i PUBLIC NOTICE
NOT(CE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail
will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town
of Vail on May 20,1996, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. in consideration of:
A request for a Conditiona( Use Permit in the CCII Zone District to allow for a miniature golf course
I to be located at 600 Lionshead Mall/Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing. ~ Applicant: Charlie Alexander
Planner: Jim Curnutte
A request for an interior residential addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at .
100 East Meadow DriveNillage Inn Plaza Phase III, Unit 111/1-ot O, Block 5D, Vail Village ist Filing.
Applicant: Tom Thornburg
Planner: Lauren Waterton
A request to modify a condition of approval for a conditional use permit for volleyball couris to be
located by the soccer field, located at 620 Vail Valley Drive/Tract A, Block 2, Vail Village 7th filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District Planner: George Ruther
~ A request for a Conditional Use Permit to use a tent at the Lionshead Ski School for Camp Vail,
located at 520 Lionshead Mall/ Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st filing
Applicant: Vail Recreation District
Planner: Jim Curnutte
A re uest for a Si n Code Amendment to allow for m men '
q 9 a a dment and reorganization of Title 16,
Signs, Chapters 16.20 (Sign Categories) and 16.22 (Sign Categories for the CC3 and ABD Zone
Districts).
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
A request to renew the 1995 approval of a conditional use permit for a three week period, to a!!ow
for an outdoor dining deck located at Garton's Saloon/Lot P, Block 51), Vail Village 1st Filing. (The
annual review of the conditional use permit is currently scheduied for June 10, 1986).
Applicant: Dave Garton
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
lllllllllll
Sign language interpretation avaiiab(e upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD
for information.
Community Deve(opment Department
Published May 3, 1996 in the Va+l Trail.
~
%
t
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
~ May 20, 1996
AGENDA
~
, ProJect Orientation / Lunch 12:00 pm
Site Visits 1:00 pm
1. Innsbruck Meadows - 2772-2892 Kinnickinnick Road
' 2. Alexander - 600 Lionshead MaA
3. Vail Recreation District - Lionshead Ski School, 520 Lionshead Mall
Driver: Jim
Public Hearinq 2:00 p.m.
1. A request to renew the 1995 approval of a conditional use permit for a three week period,
to allow for an outdoor dining deck located at Garton's Saloon/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail
Village 1 st Filing. (The annual review of the conditional use permit is currently scheduled
for June 10, 1996).
Applicant: Dave Garton
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
~ 2. A request to modify a condition of approval for a conditional use permit for volleyball
, courts to be located by the soccer field, located at 620 Vail Valley Drive/Tract A, Block 2,
Vail Village 7th filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District
Planner: George Ruther
3. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for the summer use of the existing tent
located at the Lionshead Ski School practice area for Camp Vail, located at 520
Lionshead Mall/ Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District
Planner: Jim Curnutte
4. A request for a conditional use permit in the CCII Zone District to allow for a miniature golf
course to be located at 600 Lionshead Mall/Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Charlie Alexander
Planner: Jim Curnutte
5. A requsst for a parking variance and a variance to locate GRFA within the front setback,
to allow for the construction of a new primary/secondary residence, located at 2338
Garmish Drive/Lot 12, Btock G, Vail Das Schone #2
~t Applicant: Dave Hilb and Greg Cummings
Planner: Jim Curnutte
'
ibb,
~
6. A request for an amendment to the previously approved site development plan for the
Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision, located at 2772-2892 Kinnidcinnick Road/Innsbruck ~
Meadows.
Appticant: Innsbruck Meadows Development, represented by Bob Borne I
Planner: George Ruther ~
7. A request for a Sign Code Amendment to allow for an amendment and reorganization of I
Title 16, Signs, Chapters 16.20 (Sign Categories) and 16.22 (Sign Categories for the CC3 j
and ABD Zone Districts).
Appiicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
8. A request for an interior residential addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at
100 East Meadow DriveNillage Inn Plaza Phase III, Unit 111/1-ot O, Block 5D, Vail Village
1 st Filing.
Applicant: Tom Thornburg
Planner: Lauren Waterton
STAFF APPROVED
9. A request for a minor subdivision to change the property line befinreen Lots 2& 7, located
at 2446 and 2450 Chamonix Lane/ Lot 2, a resubdivision of Lots 8, 9 and 10, Block B,
~ Vail Das Schone Filing #1 and Lot 7, Block B, a resubdivision of Vail Das Schone, Filing
#1. ~
Applicant: Karen Scheidigger
• Planner: Jim Curnutte
TABLED TO JIiNE 24,1996
11. Information Update
Sign Ianguage iMerpretation available upon request with 24 hour notificat+on. Please caU 479-2114 voice or 479-2356
TDD for information.
~
I
~
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
May 20, 1996
FINAL AGENDA
Projgct Orientation / Lunch 12:00 pm
Site Visits 1:00 pm
1. Innsbruck Meadows - 2772 - 2892 Kinnickinnick Road
2. Alexander - 600 Lionshead Mall .
3. Vail Recreation District - Lionshead Ski School, 520 Lionshead Mall
Driver: Jim
Public Hearing 2:00 p.m.
1. A request to renew the 1995 approval of a conditional use permit for a three week period,
to allow for an outdoor dining deck located at Garton's Saloon/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail
Village 1 st Filing. (The annual review of the conditiona( use permit is currently scheduled for June 10, 1996).
Applicant: Dave Garton
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION: Gene Uselton SECOND: Greg Amsden VOTE: 6-0
~ APPROVED with conditions
2. A request to modify a condition of approval for a conditional use permit for volleyball
courts to be located by the soccer field, located at 620 Vail Valley Drive/Tract A, Block 2,
Vai! Village 7th filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District .
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Henry Pratt VOTE: 6-0
APPROVED
3. . A request for a Conditional Use Permit to use a tent at the Lionshead Ski School for
Camp Vait, located at 520 Lionshead Mall/ Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st filing
Applicant: Vail Recreation District
P(anner: Jim Curnutte
MOTION: Greg Amsden SECOND: Gene Uselton VOTE: 6-0
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
4. A request for a Conditional Use Permit in the CCiI Zone District to al(ow for a miniature
golf course to be located at 600 Lionshead Mall/Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing.
~ Applicant: Charlie Alexander
Planner: Jim Curnutte - -
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Henry Pratt VOTE: 6-0
ARPROVED
5. A request for a parking variance and a variance to locate GRFA within the front sefback,
to allow for the construction of a new primary/secondary residence, located at 2338
Garmish Drive/Lot 12, Biock G, Vail Das Schone #2 ~
Applicant: Dave Hilb and Greg Cummings
~ Planner: Jim Curnutte
MOTION: Greg Amsden SECOND: Henry Pratt VOTE: 6-0
APPROVED with one condition
6. A request for an amendment to the previously approved site development plan for the
Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision, located at 2772-2892 Kinnickinnick Road/Innsbruck
Meadows.
I Appficant: innsbruck Meadaws Development, represented by Bob Borne
Planner: George Ruther
, MOTION: Henry Pratt SECOND: Galen Aasland VOTE: 5-0-1 (Greg Amsden
abstained)
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 7. A request for a Sign Code Amendment to a((ow for an amendment and reorganization of
Title 16, Signs, Chapters 16.20 (Sign Categories) and 16.22 (Sign Categories for the CC3
~ and ABD Zone Districts).
~ Applicant: Town of Vai1
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION: Henry Pratt SECOND: Greg Amsden VOTE: 4-2 (Greg Moffet and
Greg Amsden opposed)
RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL, AS MODIFIED
8. A request for an interior residential addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at
100 East Meadow DriveNillage Inn Plaza Phase III, Unit 111/1-ot 0, Block 5D, Vail Village
1 st Filing.
Applicant: Tom Thornburg
Planner: Lauren Waterton
STAFF APPROVED
9. A request for a minor subdivision to change the property line between Lots 2& 7, located
at 2446 and 2450 Chamonix Lane/Lot 2, a resubdivision of Lots 8, 9 and 10, Block B, Vail
Das Schone Filing #1 and Lot 7, Block B, a resubdivision of Vail Das Schone, Filing #1.
Applicant: Karen Scheidigger
Planner: Jim Curnutte
TABLED TO JUNE 24,1996
11. Information Update
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356
TDD for information.
MEMORANDUM
~ TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
~ DATE: May 20, 1996
~ SUBJECT: A request to renew the 1995 approval of a conditional use permit for a three week
period, to allow for an outdoor dining deck located at Garton's Saloon/Lot P, Block
5D, Vail Village 1 st. Filing.
Applicants: Garton's Saloon, by representative Steve Olson
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REGIUEST
Garton's Saloon is requesting that the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) approve
an extension to the 1995 conditional use permit to allow for the operation on an outdoor dining
deck and bar on the top level of the Crossroads parking deck, at Crossroads Shopping Center.
The application for the conditional use for 1996 was submitted after the deadline for the May 20,
1996 PEC meeting. The applicant is requesting to open for the Memorial Day weekend. In order
to accommodate the appticant's needs, staff is allowing this extension to proceed with the
condition that a new application be reviewed by the PEC on June 10, 1996.
~ The proposal is the same as last year (see memo from 1995 attached). There were no major
problems reported last year.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends approval of this request for an extension of the conditional use permit
approval for 1995. The recommendation is subject to the following conditions:
1. The extension is approved for the period of May 20, 1996 to June 10, 1996; and
2. , The extension is subject to all of the same conditions and criteria of the 1995
conditional use approval for this use.
FAeveryone\pec\memo\gar1on.m20
~
~
!r
'
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission ~
i
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: May 8, 1995
SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor bar and
dining deck operation (the "Corral") at Garton's Saloon, Crossroads
Center, iocated at 143 E. Meadow Drive/Lot 1, Block 5D, Vail Village First ~
Filing Applicants: Garton's Saloon/Dave Garton
Planner: Randy Stouder
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE
Dave Garton, of Garton's Saloon, is requesting that the Planning and
Environmental Commission (PEC) approve a conditionat use permit to aliow for
the operation on an outdoor dining deck and bar on the top level of the
Crossroads parking deck at Crossroads Shopping Center. The applicant has ~
agreed to set up the "corral" and operate the outdoor dining and bar activities exactly
the same as last year with the exception that the bar that was placed along the
landscaping bed that separates the parking deck from Viilage Center Road, will be
removed and only one bar will be operated outside. This bar will be located on the
north side of the stairs at the base of the saloon. The corral area, the props, the sound
system operation, the terms of the permit, and conditions of operation will aU be exactly
the same as last year. I have attached a letter from Dave Garton describing his
proposal, as wetl as the sketch of the corral that was submitted last year for PEC
review.
11. BACKGROUND
On May 9, 1994 the PEC approved Mr. Garton's request for an outdoor dining deck on
, the top level of the parking structure at Crossroads Shopping Center. The noise
impacts on the surrounding residential and commercial areas were the major concern
at that meeting. The Planning Commission approved Mr. Garton's request subject to
the eight conditions contained in the staff memo, and one additional condition that
required the applicant to completely clean-up the outdoor deck area within one month
' following the closure of the corral activities. The memo and minutes from the May 9,
1994 PEC meeting have been attached for reference. The conditions imposed by the
PEC covered a wide range of issues including: ~
A
/
~
0 Maintenance of access to the ADA lift through the deck area;
~ • Loading activities for Garton's must occur at approved Crossroads loading areas
only;
• Vatet parking will be provided as necessary by Garton's;
~ • A curfew of 10:00 PM on all activities on the outdoor dining deck;
• The requirement that a sound test be conducted prior to the opening of the deck
and the sound test will inciude the use of decibel meters to set a maximum
volume level for the amplified sound;
• An automatic timer would be installed to shut the music off promptly at 10:00 PM;
• Aesthetic improvements to the deck area were required and additional
landscaping was required where past loading activities had denuded the green
space separating the deck area from the South Frontage Road;
• No outdoor storage of materials would be allowed; -
• The term of the conditional use permit was established for a period of June 1
through November 1, 1994 only; and ~ Prohibition on anY banners or.si9ns associated with the outdoor dinin9 deck
area and activities.
In July 1994, the Vail Police Department recorded a couple of complaints regarding
noise at Gartons. The police reports indicated one substantiated complaint of excess
noise related to the outdoor dining deck activities. The applicant was cited for the
noise violation and warned by the Court. On July 25, 1994 the appficant approached
the PEC to request a modification of the conditional use permit to extend the hours of
operation. Staff recommended denial of the request to extend the hours of operation.
Staff felt the applicant had not had adequate time to demonstrate his ability to control
noise from both amplified music and the large crowds. Staff recommended the 10:00
PM curfew be re-evaluated in the following year.
Staff recommended that if the PEC were to approve the applicant's request to extend
the hours of operation, that the extension only be granted to 11:00 PM and that all
music, food and alcohol services stiil be terminated at 10:00 PM. Under the proposed
condition, patrons would be allowed to stay on the deck until 11:00 PM, at which time
they would have to go inside or leave. After much discussion the PEC agreed to
extend the hours per the staff condition that all music, food and alcohol service on the
~ 2
~
I outdoor deck be terminated at 10:00 PM and that all patrons must be off the deck at
11:00 PM. The PEC agreed the patrons could go inside the bar to purchase beer and ~
bring the beer back outside on the deck as long as alt people were off the deck by
11:00 PM. The PEC also requested the applicant not use the loud speaker system to
clear people off the deck as this was creating more of a nuisance than the crowd noise.
The PEC reviewed the issue of noise complaints for the portion of the summer that had
already gone by and agreed that Mr. Garton, and the Garton's on-site management
team, had adequately controtled the noise on the deck, with only minor exceptions
generally related to crowd noise rather than amplified sound.
III. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Please refer to the May 9, 1994 staff memo to the PEC for a fpll discussion of the
Conditional Use Criteria and Findings. Since the corral or outdoor dining deck layout
and operat+on are substantiaNy the same as last years request, staff feels that the
discussion of impacts to the community contained in the May 9, 1994 memo remain
valid. Staff feels that the applicant's proposal satisfies the criteria and findings as
necessary for the approval of a conditional use permit with the same conditions of
operation that were imposed on last years approval.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the requested conditional use permit with the same ~
conditions that were imposed on the operation last year, as contained in the staff memo .
dated May 9, 1994 and as modified by the condition imposed along with the staff memo
dated July 25, 1994 extending the hours of operation. The staff recommends the
sound test be done again this year and that a walk through the property be conducted
by staff to identify any maintenance needs for the outdoor dining deck and surrounding
areas. The sound check and walk through by staff should be scheduled by the
applicant no later than 2 weeks prior the opening date of the corral. This would allow
staff and the management of Garton's Saloon to work out any maintenance issues.
Staff discussed the issue to extend the conditional use permit to a multi-year approval
or to an indefinite approval. It is staff's conclusion that the approval should be granted
on a year-by-year basis, since the noise problem was not completely eliminated last
year. Staff feels that last years on-site management team did a good job in controlling
crowds and noise. However, staff recognizes the fact that the on-site management at
Garton's Saloon has changed from last year. Thus, we feel that the annual conditional
- use review is appropriate to iron out the previous year's problems.
' F:leveryone\pecMemo\garton.508
3 i
I
MEMORANDUM
~
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: George Ruther
DATE: May 20, 1996
I RE: A request to modify a condition of approval for a conditional use permit for
volleyball courts to be located by the soccer field, located at 620 Vail Valley
, Drive/Tract A, Block 2, Vail Village 7th filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Mike Ortiz
Planner: George Ruther
1. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
On February 26, 1996, Mike Ortiz, representing the Vail Recreation District, appeared
before the Planning and Environmental Commission requesting approval of a conditional
use permit to construct four volleyball courts in Ford Park. The request for the
conditional use pernut was approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission.
~ Several conditions of approval were placed on the conditional use permit. One of the
conditions required that the net posts (standards) be constructed of wood. At this time,
the Vail Recreation District would request that the condition requiring that the net
posts be constructed of wood be amended to allow the posts to be metal as originally
proposed. A letter addressed to the Town of Vail from Mike Ortiz describing the
proposed request has been attached for reference.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the request to amend
the previous condition of approval requiring that the net posts be wood. Staff feels that
the request is reasonable and in conformance with the conditional use permit criteria as
- defined in the Municipal Code.
fAeveryone\pec\memos\vrd.515
~
;i
~
^Vail Recreation
DISTRICT
~
292 W. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657
970-479-2279 Town of Vail
FAX: 970-479-2197 Community Development
Mr. George Ruther ~
VAII. GOLF CLUB 75 South Frontage Road, West .
1778 Vai! Vallcy Drive Vail, CO 81657
479-2260
GOLF & PARK
MAINTENANCE
1278 Vail Valley Drivc Dear George;
479-2262
VAIL TEIVr1IS CENTER I am writing to you concerning the construction of the four volleyball courts
700 S. Frontage Road at the Vail Athletic Field. In the February 26th P.E.C. review process for a
479-2294
conditional use pemut for these courts, it was set forth that the net standards
JOHN A. DOBSON ARENA should be constructed of wood. The VRD at that time agreed to comply with
321 Lionshead Circle
479-2271 this condition. However, after lengthy reseazch of available products, I'm
VAIL YOUTH SERVICES re9uesting that this be reconsidered. There aze no wooden standards on the
395 E. Lionshead Circle mazket which are suitable to the competitive specifications to which these
479-2292 courts must be constructed. Additionally, metal poles would be a much
VAIL NATURE CENTER safer alternative as there aze no sharp edges, along with the fact that the •
Vail Valley Drive metal poles will be padded. I hope this request can be considered in that it
479-2291
will be safer and of a higher quality than any wooden standard system.
MARKETING
292 W. Meadow Drive
479-2446 TlaT1k yOll,
~
M1Chae1 Ol'fiZ
Sports Supervisor R/sports/poies
. •
,
• MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
I FROM: Communiry Development Department
I DATE: May 20, 1996
SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to a!!ow for the summer use (Camp Vaii) of
the existing tent located at the Lionshead Ski School practice area, tocated at 520
Lionshead MaN/ Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st filing.
I Applicant: Vail Recreation District / Vail Associates, lnc.
Planner: Jim Curnutte
1. pESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE
The Vail Recreation District (VRD) has requested a conditional use permit to allow for the summer use of the existing temporary tent, located on Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st filing. The
applicant has indicated that the construction work occurring at the Golden Peak Children's
Center during the summer of 1996 has caused them to temporarily relocate the Camp Vail and
Pre-Kamp Vail activities to the Lionshead Center Building for this summer only. I
• In the fall of 1994, Vail Associates received approval to construct a temporary tent at the base of '
the Lionshead ski portal in order to facilitate ski school instruction. The PEC granted the
conditional use permit for a period of one ski season only. In the fall of 1995, Vail Associates I
- requested a new conditional use permit to again use the tent for ski school activities, in a slightly
different location than the previous approval. As a part of the request, Vail Associates asked that '
the conditional use permit for the tent be approved for winter use, in perpetuity. Although the
PEC did not approve the request to use the tent every ski season in perpetuity, they did agree
that it could be erected for the next three ski seasons, expiring at the end of the 1997/98 ski
season (April, 1998). The PEC approved this conditional use permit request with the condition
that the tent be in place for no longer than a six-month period, to coincide with the normal ski
season, and shall be removed promptly when the mountain closes each April.
As previously approved, the tent is located approximately 7' south of the Lionshead bike path
(see attached site plan for exact iocation) and is constructed of a tan-colored vinyl material
supported by pine logs. The lower portion of the tent sides is rough sawn logs and the upper
portion is vinyl, which can be rolled up so that the tent functions as an open pavilion. The tent is
approximately 18' tall at its highest point and is 40' long by 24' wide. There is a wooden floor
constructed in the interior of the tent. Electric, phone and gas lines have been run to the tent.
As the tent is not used at night, there are no lights, inside or outside.
Although many of the activities associated with Camp Vail will take place within the Lionshead
Center Building, the VRD will be utilizing the open field to the south for outdoor play activities.
The District would like to utilize the tent, Iocated adjacent to the play area, to expand their
children's programs to include an appropriate location for indoor activities such as drama,
• discovery and art blocks. The VRD believes that they will utilize the tent at least 8 hours out of
1
the 10 hours that Camp Vail is in operation each day (see attached schedule). The requested
dates of use are June 10th through August 23rd, Monday through Friday. The hours of operation • I
of Camp Vail are 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Since the existing tent is not authorized to be used during the summer months, and is actually I
required to be removed from the property, the Vail Recreation District must apply for a new
conditional use permit in order to utilize it during the summer of 1996. Per Article 32 of the I
Uniform Fire Code, tents are not allowed to be used as permanent structures, and their use shall
not exceed a period of 180 days, within a 12-month period, on a single premise. Although the
existing tent has been in place for greater than 180 days, and if approved this request will extend
its use throughout the summer, Dan Stanek (Building Liaison Officer) has granted an extension
to this time period to allow for the continued use of the tent during the summer of 1996.
II. COMMERCIAL CORE 11 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
Zoning: Commercial Core II
Area: 1.645 acres or 71,656.2 sq. ft.
low sooosed
Height: 45 feet 18 feet
Setbacks: 10' on all sides N: 14'
S: 33"
E: 13"
W: 360' •
Site Coverage: 700/o or 50,159 sq. ft. N/A for seasonal structure
Parkiag: Parking is not raquired for temporary structures.
III. CRRERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.60, the Community Development Department recommends approval
of the conditional use permit based upon the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the
Town.
The development objectives of the Town of Vail can be found in the purpose
section of the Commercial Core II (CCII) Zone District, as well as the Zaning Title
of the Municipal Code. The purpose section of the CC U Zone District calls for a
mixture of uses. Section 18.02.020 (B) 10, the Purpose Section for the Zoning
Titte, calls for the provision of recreational facilities. Staff believes that this
recreational facility will provide an appropriate location for the Camp Vail and Pre-
Kamp Vail children's programs. We believe that the use of this tent to augment
the functions of a summer day care faciliry, for the summer of 1996, is appropriate
and adds to the mixture of uses in the Lionshead area.
2 •
~
• 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public facilities needs.
Staff believes that there will not be any negative impacts to the criteria referenced
above. -
3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control,
access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and
parking areas.
Staff believes that there will be little impact on traffic, or refated issues, if the
conditional use permit is approved. Parents dropping their children off for the
Camp Vail program will park in the Lionshead parking structure and walk to the
Lionshead Center building. Although the majority of arrivals will be through the
Lionshead mall, some parents may arrive via the bike path, located on the south
side of the building. In either case, staff believes-that the proposed use of the
tent is not likely to generate additional vehicular trips in Lionshead.
The VRD will place an orange snow fence (as shown on the attached site plan)
along the north, west and south sides of the outdoor play area, which is located
between the Chair 8 lower terminal and the tent. When outdoors, the children
(twenty at most) will have constant supervision at a ratio of at least 1 adult for
• each 10 children. Due to concerns related to the construction activity in the area
this summer, including the use of the bike path by construction vehicles, limited
, openings in the fence will restrict access to and from the play area. During
outdoor playtime, the children will be escorted to the play area by adults. The
VRD has requested that the Town provide a few "Children Playing," signs to alert
construction workers of the children's presence.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in
relation to surrounding uses.
Staff believes that the requested conditional use permit to use the existing tent for
the summer months will have little effect on the character of the area in which it is
located. If the use of the tent were not allowed for the summer of 1996, and
- physically removed from the site, as per the existing conditional use permit
requirement, the VRD would still utilize the area south of the bike path for outdoor
children's activities. Staff does not believe that the additional use of the tent, in
conjunction with these outdoor activities, would have a negative effect on the
neighborhood.
• 3
~
B. Fin in
The Planninq and Environmental Commission shall make the followina findinas before •
grantinaa conditional use e~t:
1. That the proposed location of the use in accord with the purposes of the
conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the
district in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use wouid compiy with each of the applicabie
provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit to use the existing ski school tent for
Camp Vail activities for the summer of 1996. Staff believes that the proposal is consistent with
the criteria as discussed above, as well as the findings. Specifically, staff believes that the
proposed use of the facility is consistent with the purpose section of the Commercial Core II Zone
District. Staff believes that there will be no impacts to public health, safety, and wetfare and that
the provisions of the Zoning Code are met. Staff recommends approval of the request with the
following conditions:
1. Skirting must be added to the bottom of the tent to prevent children from •
accessing the area underneath the tent.
2. Prior to-the use of the tent, a new stairway, with railing, must be constructed to
provide safe access in and out of the southern doorway.
3. No signs may be placed on the property, or the tent, until they have been
reviewed and approved by the Town.
4 •
M
!
^Vail Recreation
DISTRICT'
• T-own of Vail
292 W. Meadow Drive Conditional Use Permit
Vail, CO 81657 RE: Using VA's Tent for Camp Vail
970-479-2279
FAX: 970-479-2197 "Scope and Se9uence"
- If the permit is issued the Vail Recreatian District's Camp Vail is
1778 v~ v~u Y D~e planning on using Vail Associates' tent in Lionshead for the
479-2260 following activities.
GOLF & PARK
MAINTENANCE 7:30=9:OOAM A place for the 5-12 year olds to meet if they don't
1278 Vail Valley Drive want to play inside the building or outside on the available grass.
479-2262
To be used for playing games, talking, or just hanging out.
VAII, TEAiNIS CENTER Supervised at all times.
700 S. Frontage Road
A79-2294
9:45-12:30PM {Mon. & Fri.}* A possible location for Drama
IOHN A. DOBSON ARENA
321 Lionshead Circle presentations or Discovery talks. Ttlese would last anywhere from
479-2271 20 - 45 minutes, three times a day (until 12:30). '
VAIL YOUTH SERVICES
395 E. Lionshead Circle 12:30 - 3:30PM (Mon. & Fri.)`' Not in use. '
479-2292 ;
vAu. xATUxE cErrrsx 4:00 - 5:30 PM As in the morning this area can be used as an '
Vail Valley Drive additional s ace to the ski school or outside. '
479-2291 P
MARKETING I
292 W. Meadow Drive
479-2446 tOn Tuesdays and Thursdays the 9:45-12:30 & 12:30-3:30 slots would
be reversed. So the tent would not be in use on Tuesdays and
Thursdays in the mornings.
We feel we need to offer an additional space for the children to
gather due to the amount of construction going on in the area. I
hope that this time schedule is what you need. Please give me a call
at 479-2292 if you have any questions.
Susan C. Hodder
Director of Camp Vail
•
i -
' ~ .
~
L1~V1S ~~a~ ~2N 1 ~Z~ L.a L,v'~ • ~ - .
I
r . -
~
;H ' 'f r -
.~Car^f
~ , N O
• ASPMIiII . • • ~ ` / '
f
PEnct
• of2n~n rn
7ENT
vs..s. cs.vsscc:,;e:•- :te'~YS,a..
3~{[ NtY•T•]!Y~~Y~SY.Yf:~ , y~ `~yMS'.~=+I=fv'J!`:_ /
/.:.TiCAf3,a}a'i.r"R'P'!F~ . Td•W#~'.: ~ •
Si.CC.ltitii•MM'+.i'SS~. ~ . 5.~• iYs:~MQre'C .
,~yce
~ ' ~ ,
Fiff4-Ref•"~~^~~~i:i.7F!;QY7'~S~MT~L ~ /
~+'a%~;~t~ =":C~.'A'T'.~~2•sii~iTC':'!.leT~ ~ ~
~e'. tiir~la;.ilJ`si~it^~.r~~e~a•rbL.t
Nl~ASM.:#~.,°S~Y.: es-+te+~'»4+K•ar -
C .
,p~/' 7
• ('7„ ~
• ~ _.:..,.-,~.,,,~~:.~.s,: P~a
: . q o'-e Cf_ ' A ~ .
}
' m 7
• ~ CX~St1NG ; • '
• CNt1R~IRT ' ,
No.
. . . a Z
, N o FT _ • _ / _ 1
` - ~ ~ . . - t
p . ~ ~ ` ~ • ~
,
GDRE i , ' • /
Cn"EEK
• ...-~-1 . • t ~
y
•
•
~
~
. _ . . ~ '"'~yy~_..., ~ _ ...~....ti,..
M ,
~ ~Ala„~,?i 6r,..
sY'
f 4
AC$4
. ~
•
I `
' Of
.
~ ~.r,• i~
$
- 6. '#I III~I'
•
i
,
i '
~ . ~"'i-~-~,% , '1 ~ . , ~ ' , ' 1
• ,
. . . , ~ . . .
' ~ . , . . . . ` . , ,
, . . • , , t , . ~ • ~ . • -
~
~ ~ . ~ . ~ ' i ~ • ` ~ . - . ~ ' ~ .
. • . ti • ~ , . ~ , , ' , ' •
r , ~ ' ~ ~ • S ~ ~ t . , ~ •
. ~ • .
• ' ~ J ~ .
, . • , , , 1
. : . . • _ - " f . i
' • • ` ` ` / ,
.
. i \ • ~ / i X " f ~ , . ~
~ i~ ' n i~~ ~,~~.T~L 1'r~t• ~ . i
.
, , • ~ i . ~ , V ~ ,
. . ~ ~ • , , ,
. . 4 .
,
~ v4i~
'
. ~ ?J
~ . . , , .
~
,
. ~
~
;
i
•
~ . • , . ' . 't
. .
. . • ' . ~ • . , ,
~~Sr ~S t
~ .
. . ~ 1
i,' ~t~~ • ` ~ ~ '
~ ` ~ ~
`'L•, ~ r,~,,,~~..
r }i i , ~ ' ~ ' •
~~;.~~1 ' . • j y.~~~ . . ~ .
i ~ ' 1/`~"y~ i ' • 1} 1
• ~ , ~ !rt 1~ F'..i
~ ~ i ~i• ~
~ ' ' • ' ,j ' 'j . , l~ ~~,~t,~--lt i
7r • : - ` ' ' ~ , p,i ~ . .--ar~~~ G~• ~ j ~ . ~
Vx l
, ' ~ ' ~ . f , ~ , • a
/
.
~ ~ - ~ • .
~ " N j;' r ' • . '
• t'; ~s . ~ . / , \ ~ ~ ~ . . . .
A~.1
` . ~ _ ? ~,'-o'i` ~ ~ ' _
. . , _ , . . . . , i . . . . ~
F ~.s. ,'.~t; .~.:^:r.,:•~Y.t~.•+ - ' ~a„~,~ ~_~r "t^.i' i '
:i. Y ~.'1, i~` .E. r- ~1~. ~.f.j?L ~ {:.i~• A. 'y.•• '.F - j~..i' . V? 1 ~ l:: Sl e~. ' z .
• ` 'y' t '„4~~"':1, ,,t. ,,t. t';~; , 1.:: '@''~t , ' " . `'y^•.'ri~'~fi a ' ,•t+tt1
~~C~~~. ~ r~.' `r.. 4~~."~,f, ~~•~9.^ „}t t~hC1'~';~.~ ~ :~t E ~~t~~ t"f.r ~....:.I.tl.' .
•:~~,•,.rs:. ~'.4~ 4f. tup: ..~y. ~1.~E i ,_~s.t~~, ,.i' •h ,.r~' ..3"~ t .~c { .i_'s , ':i3;.'~ ~ :'i'.. ~,.J`rt: t r~ ~'i.'~- y d . t ~ T
:t:.-:1~,...{~:' ;rl,~n.C. •};.t _1.«.y ' L "~r, .:.I,;M.`~'~i. e . • ,c ~ E?':'%.~~'L k~~ia, v~+,t .
~ ;C'=-~- s ~ -b- : ' `fe;:_'~ ja.,:.~ s Y:.~ 4~
1~:, lrt t. , w 'K"f Y7 E~ t i~!;. ;'~tL ~L7.r 1 r• ; r s`N' , i "'v` "i : r t. ~
it,'r'' t•~a;:,~..~yr `~~r,i~~~,~.,n•,~.~ _ ~y,,.Yr ~~:;,~,~?r~}.ti:.•.~;: .ti. ~ ~•li,, ~t r9;n: ' r.~, ~s..'z-7~ , ~.~.,1.r r,r~,. ~ •.i... ~ ~s.,~~c.:4`' .,~.a;
- . r . ~ :~k~ ..~~~+•,l- ..~t,~ ' e .I~l, .'t: . ~ z • .a? - .',f ~V,4 . ~~i
i ,q • : r ~~r 'J..; •i':t•: v.(i ~ Y ~ ~ i ~':h'' .t. . . ~ }.:~.r t1~=
t'.~.f~: f ~1• r. ~ ' a: ..1:; ~I, {~+Sdi'~ , ~ ~i: .ri, v4 'i i.~~~~~~ ^T', 'a;~ • d.: .fh i, 7^• r :"i•f• .T•. ..t:>. "t
..r,, i '7, # , t, ~;'t fi~...~ . ~ j: i . - I. .t •
~.G'.~ 1~.R~ r ~,4~~ ti_.i~ ;•i~e;zt~.f~t . ~ ,r.,:r.a~R... ;,~[.'a.~.ii .;c ~...'p ~~,p.~ „p_i. .i,.1,r~. ..tti~'~:.~ rYtiX.~.~.q,t+~..
1 f:7x' ~~y, 4 : V.~r, \i•.~ ;."'~y, .4 ~ ~ 4.,t~: .:F'1 J' .c ff ' .f• 4.i~ q ,1G '
~ :S.,;i, :c~..~.~ .K.l:)V T~l• .~J ~f~ t •.Y~ • .'1' ~i •.a..(. 1. i 9: 1,~ ~ • 'y ~ l l .rr G
I'i. '~'i',' .r:Tw ~t ..Yil. .i)~~~ . • _.~c~, ~ t. 1 I~L 1 Y T..^t +..t~`}~V
ti-
i.., ~:7. •F'.~ ' , rJ: r ' r-:~ ~ i ~ r; ,'c .r' t' . : v t
`y"!~' :Ir• :i:t.. !''A . ~.f. 1i,. .r~ 1:. .s.~i!~`i
fY i` .ir" ~•i• .C.•~: ,•6 oI• ~\K' ~ ~ ;i
~ ' 'i!~ ~ , : t.; ,.K. . j ' ? ~ ~`.i . ~ '•(i..« y :
'4 1! f"• `
Hv .j~. . . i•' - a.
. >.1 .
•~Z ' '
•.1 J.
'S.~ :i.~ _ ,,t ~r..
• i ~
r:• :i~ -y.,~l•h .z~,:' ,
: .N~~~ r•~' .P.~ • ~ ~ ~ ~i`1 h',^: `
~r''Y'. i. 't.~ - t'.y^ •i~ '•.i`td~n.
•a. .~L"~i~: i: 'tir '.f.- 't.~" ~K,`'"'' nr
rY. I ~
'f•
•.i:• ~ FH' . .
'f...•,:~
t
"f•
' •,u; ' 1••'
.
~~i. . 01::; ~i.
:1 ~ . T .'P! • J. V: - : 'a': q • -.y:.
~l.t'.-~5~ •t~ a .~,.~V7 A :`t., •'J.'.: .4r ta ..N~f., ~ •<•'~t, r17~ '7r ~ ~ • aA„'~
'i .~.t. ~w. ,r.' r'J~ ~ ~ .i: i ~ •t• :~~w• , ~F:~.
•r_ •'4'.J'. :y' 4'~4.1 ~•['i.~w .y± t , '.I.r. ~.t.'t
s~. ''y. A..t .7~r`..w.• ?G~ :"i=t~, K- t•-' . . •3.
':t•• ,:~t' t':'t ~ • 'fi _
f
^Y:.ir .M '~i ~nr
b.. :i'..r ~ .'i .1-•'•
•1~~ 1~'~r7~%' ,i' ~r~3 .r.l' ::ti:• :t....
\ r y ~~J Y.~.• i.~ ~ ~ .
.1• ~~t. ~ V .1a~' .
' •'1``' ,ti~'~ •,:i:
`L.ity'. • ~li•.•4 1•~
R. ~~r~ r`~ ..c'•' '~•t'~:V.~ .1~.~i•,'y~`~~
~nt~ ~.L .f~..,C r.~'. ,•i~~•1 ' ~.1.•i~~~~ } ,:I.~L~~ t ~''t .
•f•'~' r~., y~'i.i'. '~l'"' '.1 .~.z- '~~t..l, %%..'S. •~P. y' :.+~~..q_:r
7 C~'.t. i 1 •.e:"'.:-'f r ? !:7~ ~ t v,,t:a ~ "i" "`i; i' • ~ '~.i •'1. :t,:~~ 'T` ~r..' • ~ . t . r v .:.~i
t` i1.`. ~1. r ..J;, r,~.....~ .r'A't;~ vY~ - •i• :v.
'~.•,~r.. 'r' ,.N. ~i Y.'')~' :if• :~r.`+''a~.~•! •i~ ~.~f. •1:~.
,c.'. 7•:1.• t~~ :t~5-•' > r J(:;; • :.a. ..i.b , ' , ; ( ~ 'r .yi • i. ~:t.
.C} •S~ .~Y„ r" r 1 S~,_ C. i .
•j•~;t.
1~• l. ~C%~~ r'i.•• I ~
.1~: •.,R'+ t .•Z~~~
~ l~ .i"r. - ~1~ .'1 y 1'P'~ _ ./.i
. ~~i. ~ , , ~
i' I `n • ~f. • '~i
•.r ~r' >1i~ '~C: ti~ .
.r• •t:' : cir~ ~t:. ` .
`Jl .:w'~' :i'' . •~~.t~v'•''
. . . `~f•' . ,i'~ . ::.f c. . . . ~a' . ,
. . ' t ~ J~i~ ~ H:,~ . • , . . ~ ~ ~ . . _ . . . ~ . . . '
• ~ ' . ~ . .~r~;'. ~ . . . ,F. • ~ ' +
n i: ,i'; 1 ~ ? L;~. , ^ 4.,
T+' ',I'_ ; ,`s. 1.~ ~:tii•r:•~. i~'•. M 1 f4 'r• ~ ~ i~ • . . 3'^ ~a~ . ? ~ .i.:~^'
1 .y. .i.:Q `.~;•~~rl~ sJ .r,~.:~1;: ;tYR~ ' ~ ra~v ~ . ~~''•t~ ~.,r-~e . •
` ^:.i' . 1„:..1, T .v.. A '.'t• a:~ . ~ , . . , , ,'wf
I •il' ~ t ~ . i ~ ~i~ 'f•'• •i • ~ F.. I ~ , , , . ,.~7-'~ ,
I i~ / 4 - f+ . ' 1 . ~~1~ • • ~ ~ • t - f . . . . , ~ .Sr~: .
i'i'i~..~Y~f•~4' ~rY _ t. . ~.:P."F~ii`~'~'•+•9 f/~'~'~'li..•~~ E' . i?' p S _ : i . ~ ~ . ai..'
~ti,.e~._~~a.
.~'.I::Z_~~•~~tr 'f. [ , il ,.tr: l ~~1'`. ~a '^'Y' }Y`.f ' .
;.~..t. .y t~,: :t: M. :~a tit r. ~ ",1,.
:'c:• i. .l ~:k'it :Y: , i ~i'
Lr1" . ~ ' '~~i . ~S y , A.. u ~ ~ { ~ :~F•• . ~ 4Y.: . t'' :y ~ t.'-i' C "~~.ti~ •~'s.) 1.* Y. yu ' f t ~ ~
w;:1`~ ~ - . 1 r• - , ;
t. . ?F I r ~
'n ti~:
•I'1.U~ 5' ! •.T• .V' ,f ~
.k.-. t' • i , ~t
~'i 1'a ~ . ~ < ~.i, t . .
~ } • ~ .'r: : . :c '1, : •
r~'4 •^'t• :~M~i ~C'•~t 'Y 4' 1' , . ~
{
.i' 1 . . r"~
,
. ~ '•~:t . . . .
~
`
•Y'
ri;%`• rr
; •i; t
1 . .
.
'r
~'y •
I
1 1
• t 1 I' , l. • .
~f 7~' 1 .1~~ •7
•t'~ ~ t ~
1. 1, '1 1
t' 1
t
~ ~..`..(a~~, . .Ui''r.° i. r.i.. :~L,~;..'=.'` l_.'~ 1 ..r:
. ~ . ~ .
. . , .
i t ~ . •
. :i~ . . . .:1 ~
t.t.~..~` •~3: , •i ~~~i:S:_`:.~~~y;-?.',~`,.1~:: ..i~~ ~Y, , Si . ' ~ , . , 777.7.
:~~~t,~,
r .i, rE ._r` 'i"- ~i~,' , 7;` ..~r^ .tr • t .y~ ~ ' f> -.i
..;c. :t' .k'.Oa''::f:="s i• . • ,
+y~~.. .f':~~ .r.' c •.l ~••G Y ~t: tU~d :~c• ~.~~~i:.
~:y. ,~g, s f .y, ~.i• =1d' «t~4ty°'j:~~:>?'~ ! ;s'• ,l: a;o'i."~ ~ 2..- ~ .,a T'• ~ r:{ . s ,I ( -•~e
c l ,~,y~L~:!~i.'Ki..r•.~.i4}r h.~'~ 'r .t~~~`1r.'il'~.~;v~i'~ ~i~~ , J. •i" R.';H:~.
f .r ~ t T '3 } Er,~4 Ad~~ - t ~'7~. ~d. ~1.. 'f~' 9. :.i• '.c
•N•'... "o}. r. ..l
t 1~ L i~, .1~.~ A.. j~{, 4 ~.,t• y. I'd'J~ .t ~i . '~Y7' s,,.. ~'y:i~ t„ .v`
•!3~.. J• t ..f. ~ p ..l"~. ri: 'r 'r I:i' 'j'~ ..i :'~1! •'3':)''.; r r •J.•
?i~~~~~~, .if .J ii•a~7f' .47„1!~.~ ;.A~`ir; :ly V..ir• :I •~.'•I •'~...1 l .t t~i. ?i.~~• ~:S f.l
b1~ '~LL'u..~.'~'i.~..t~;•;:~'.d, s•.t~ .i~. ~i~ ~J.t,. ~Y•_'~~ t''~:, j~ :~~~•;v 'i• •y, s•l, r' ~ ~
.v w~.~°' t. t< ~ •~r;~• ~.is..,:`.~,. '~4' .4~.{.l V" .i, :1.'1'-~ .~'an ~rt:
tG~ .i~': .~4.. t'.tr ..r 4: y ~f~• •1"`, .i•.i•~ ;r.: r~~ ~t:: ~~t~~.
A i. ~'d• '}•,I.%,~, n.• ai;'~ . - ! p
~ ~ ~y' ~ ,5'- ~ Ji'.. : _ -f't':. i" ~y f
•F N~ ;1~ 1 ~:ty'9 n.~i~iC i. ri~.. :r~ i ~ ~4.i .l~ ~ ! •
i~K` i~~ 11•. i:~ ° r~ y'~~ _.c .
+c . A ~l h''.. • 1
.t• .r .i .z.~ ~~s. . ~~r• r; .•s•r .Y..
- ~G: t. ~y:,~
w~'s. 'i.'at v' .,~`tr..,:';•... .yr 1 ,.f:. ~l! '6`3'
t , . '1:: ).a.. ,v" n; --ti.-+ i~.; Z. ,
^ ,l•d",~, ~ii .h. '7'~~ 'x r" v: ~1'N:r
~ ~ ~~i' A~' .P: ^p` .r :N+1r. ':w° r.;~ - ~:~w°'.~Y.: .t':3~~ ~1•rr-. i~'.''~?. ,.i,.' r .t- t'l ~w.
1_~ ~1` ~i [ 'I:i .'A - . ~.~,~.:1i- ,1t~~ .~,•I~ "ti:~''5:.."~" .w~o~.it,i.
:1.. { •ih • ~ _ 9. S 1 ~ -i~ w` ~S~'~ 'i ~ j ~ Y y.a' i 14`: ~~k~. h ~}..t ~ • ~ ~'.I;~j ° i ~i . A~ ~ :'~.ca~l•l ~ t~j~nt ' A . S 1 ~1~. i
F 1 `R ~~~~•~T'.iS.. f~+, ~~a~ 1 i: ~ J „s:. l... ~t~ ~
1, c r. ~ . ~y~,;'•j.'~ r, ` i ?y. .;4~ EF.!.~.. ti~ ' y ~ ~ : t~ Y.,: ~ :~~i+'' :i.f L'i ~ ' • j't' ~i' ~1'.~t '
l'~~'•~~j.itin6•~Y~r..'Fx~`.7'1~:~'t..iL\.1 4`V~i~':~~.t:.. .'/~~~~GZ=~]~b.~iF t.M~t, 4'f`,,-i:~:'•~~w yii;~K-•L~A:~'t.t,.tj'~y~4`1~i.:~ /i~~~.Jl:d`~~ .
y~+~~ ~ 4!~. ,~w ~5i:..,.r~: 6; v; • ~ . ~t,. ~ , ~ ~i i',• k d r a
T ;y~,.~,t''~2'~yr•~L~ ''a~ er"r' i~ ~f.?,'.t` :t'.t:M L~~;~ 1. ;~t _K.F. 1,y,~ :a; rt t ~ ti ..c 't r.~4•r '~i~~
F ~o. ~j-~. Y:: ~ P ~ y'~•:•
it . ~1~ ~!F. y.- .'L7 yy 'a<.r1~ . i . IC,-ry ,y~ t:'/•. T ~ y: ~..::k~.,,Y~= y • S~,~b,:.. i~ i r ~ t a~ tr.rd~ K'•~ i~:~~'f!~ y,` .e1~ ~ ni.t. {~.t',I:~' 't .
j' 'aj'.y~.r~.. `,'7 ,.•gydi ~.,'.1`?.:~.. ~li ilrsr ;!~',;,~;-w.. ~J'}''t~«' "'^I.a.:~~ . a,tl,tY;,l;...ri'e1~:~i:U" ~i::Y -si : ~a -;C~;,: t,s.. ~ r,R,rt ~•''}.~,.,.3'""a... . j'N' )
i ~'°~t~~cfi .n. 1•. a;. .1'" •R,-.al Y . c, 's~•t~ ~":i~' ..'^e ~':l. A Y. Yfi iJ F~ ,tiT-~ Ya. ~J~.: :a
cr~-~ ~ :.i1?'.. :~fA• • ~4 t, r.r ir : ~ ~.~w 4;'?.,. ~ ..y.. r i~ ° ~i)~
~ t~j1' ..~~.>j'f.• ~'~J :l:f.S~-• ~'1~'~IrSj:S:IF~'".,{'~,. f`i ~ :'f Y j~ ~w..~~~ri;• Tl~~~'w[ !;~'si. ,cl,.~~. ~i
YA~ "f; y~C`~.~ ~.~i~ r. r..w`.'i''G .~~~Y` 1 'jt' ; ~ ~•:t Z~~•~ ~:n~T.~..~•f:
t~ .~1+~~ "~~L ~ y !wti ~i•s.~ y n~_"~.h f~~-- ,ij .F:.[+ .q~+.,. t Y.ka 5~:;~ j~~.,rC1 ~d p: • ~'..~y..:~~~i;`~f~ ..W* Xi!!,,
i ~ • ~ F i t4 v.~(;` lt;."w. ,'y.~ M • F a! . : .e i r t~ ~ t' ' f+
'.h,~:71V1~• :~~~:3~~+~1: ~f;'qn~iiM., t^. ~~'ti~,~"~' ..t1~•~ 7Y9~ ttW,~C...a.` '~'~1.~. :'fU 'T
. • . ' • . . ' ' ' , ' •1I , • , • - • • , (M,
~i ~ . . . j . . 't.' , • . . . . ~ I . . ' , , , , ~ ,
; .'t . . ~ e , . - r ' . • „ ' . ' ; . •
. . : . ' • . ~ •
. . • . ~ , . . • ' . ! ' . i
' ~ ~ , : ~ ~ . • . ~ , '
i
. . ' ' t • .
• 'I ' , ~ , r • ~ . , ti ~ ' i` ~ i . . . ~ ~ . . s
, . , ~ . . . , . ~
~ • ~ ~ • . ~ i . ~ 4~
_ . . . ; . ~ . .
' ~ ,r.~^- ~~Y~ yr-r+~••:'T.-n.c~ 7--r~.~,:ti.~n:r~'._..t~.?.`';^'^^.T-a^e.~'7;~.':-...'ti. N._.y, t~ ^T`..'.:~~ .
C!~y 1.1~?}~, '~,~.a"~? )~~K'!1'`~?'3:• 1t~~~~~ ~,'tl~k~~;.~1-'~~{~:.` ~4 _'N''. ~1~ •'1 .AY.,[~n((~~' 71~~'.~Y ~1,'~i••- .
~ '.~+'~'~j'~r~j:'j twJf. 4 ~u' ~l~ti?,• ; -{''b~ ~ Y::~ ~ ,.jY :~T. ~.:t..: qi.;t"~~''~ 1 ~ .~.i!Y;`~~~:~1..~~.~tI i ~ir'"rZrs , .
"Tr a • ~.~.i'~ ~ .(a• 1r , ~ .f~:y,N`~ ! ; 1. _ ;t: ~ I, ~ j•• .+'.%x~ /.=xfr~
t F r J S 1 1 ~ F Y" 1:~: • f: ~4~-'Y~ -]~M.~
..R~at: : I 4,?"~T~~, `S ."'~ii. ~'.i titr'"t = t~ ~1 •3'r. ~ . ~ ~1- -T~.. , ? ~ ~ l~•~'•~~ a v a'i
d g% b: ~..t~,
r~K;;~ t..r ' .?~':i..., p a, [i ,R..~ ~.~;~=i•`~~~,.:" t ~ 'i• l-i 1 ~ -:i
`F, ..=~.r„ I.. ,A•~, i :w,;~:s'w ,F r~;~ .i•..S'i; t^qy1G•,. :?4.., i~a.~~.: e~- ' ~I,:" ~i: ~ 7r.~ ;_~.;r.
7 St.lrirVilrl. ;'~~~'~i.• ' ,1, ..t ~ , .r
~I ,L' '•,r•^~: _7•: -.i" V` ~ z-: .a fJ~' , ~i . '!t~"
~,I. h. f~• ~r ,•?.Y:.r~`i1-~~ :J, ~.a~~. :"S~. ss.'t'•~,., .t:'f. .r,'} ~ .S~ 'r ~r ~f'.t, r
i.• , .u `r ~~f . o ~ < ,y ~ i• r: .
y~ ~r'• 'i^ ~'t"'~ -
f'.[
l .:~7 ? .I' . ~S _M. i r , ' k ~ .
'L. ~y-.~~i ~w~' ; n ~'1'! •.-Ts~~.'~ 't . i} h. . • ~ p ' ~•j' 4~'~ 'i' ~ 'C~ .
~
4
r,~v~ i~9.rK. q'•`q `•4.' ~~i: t.~r L~ .c+ •.a. ~C ~'r.'•` ^•i.... . I
J': : t', ~T'I :
r..
,
z• ~r: .r
~
~t y
w
~
.
r
T• .t
{I~ J'~ ti •i
x .z7 r
; t.
~
~ ~
•f+ ~
't.
~L
'Y
~ ~r •~F.~
~
.r; ~~;w, ~F •
~t'
• ~n,•, x>.
t;i -~a i
1.
.•r-
-:y1. ~y' _ ',W.. ~ : •S'. .1 :1
„i~: "t.~.Q. ~"~1i..'d`ti4' .~I'iiY..:L i; K.,1::~. ~l'~ :ti <~•.1.' ( M ~
•~e -.l. :~M:'r rt '.:F. .,E :,'i,.id"! ~4 , '7" - H.:~~ i .t.
..~y. ..i~' -..-.i4: , u:7 °4. ~ •~.q'. .t~~~ .r;,~.•'Q 'I ••al ~1. ~ .J•~ • , {
,y': • f• •~e~ 1~ '1r. ye;~ F. : ~ x ..t ~'j~3~ •~•,y'~' .1r ~1 s4 ~ ,i ~t ~ ~.y ~~A:~. i~^LYt ',l, '~~.1 ~S• :tv 1
..4y~~' ~ - ~'a,,' :.y
.s" .•7~,'. 1: 'r'°: .1'I' i
~!y'J~. ~ ~ .6 . ' i - r . r '•~i
~ t•
`i.
~
~'i.' • • :~S
"y •A •C' 'i•
r L ' i-
4
? 1 ~ ^l•'
•7 ti
~ u'~~~` •~Y:,
.'P..N '1 .~x1..a•~ s. _VK'Y~ +i. < ~./''•.h~.~y .~1. .tr~ a~ ~..e'
X- "1t i ' r~7t• Ir:/' ' i._"y*}.. Jr : '~7L^ ai,. '~~.~1" n , sc. R.. F:° • " i ! ~7 a~: .r.i. ~
rJ.;r. Sq±k~i~• .iti~~ "Y:• e.Y~ ;uC,~ ~~-rA• ~n, :Y 51:e'~`. '+i' i~7i:' ~i•:~ -
~s. ~3~ . r r:d 14!~ r ~ , . \i{~ 'i~ 'r'•? .iJ'm ~ . k ~,1...: y yiT • r ~ i•c:.r z:[;~f - i ~ C j; ; r , a' cr;::::t. . i~~ e .f + ~ .
4r~1.. .'k ~,yt..S" ~....r. ~.+:.-:'x•~ lf. •,y1,L.t`{:•~~ :f.i.: .~•.,t ,'~v;!'M:j: S ~1.~.., . •i~•~'.',A .l~t~; 1 :x~y;:. ~ i9.' .~r,',Y,,` - !ti•
4.:~.~~f :,+:~1 ..t.: 0 :l.i:Y'`.,°' •,~'t r~,1;~s 'S~•i': ~1t• i ,i~ `y.'~~ 4~ ~.w
k'S.'i;~~it~r~..;~.~. u.K^ rIl : a.Il:t .d'. ..pJ.:i.,:~'' •v. .f ' vii ~ t'~ t - ~ i~~ i
•t tf •_iA,~' ct .1,::3 ~~.y:i;,tiM.:,i.: o. ;,.,,+`~,_.t. ;ti,.. ti ~ ;,r,-.'S%: ';a•`. a ;:i.. ~s~.
`dVMy%+~~s y.m :}.s ~:.rtl. f~' •>M:- ':J ^1*': '!h~ '~~1: i~~ t' i''H ~ ~ _ v.:• ~ .~~~i;'G t~:
-ov
i~t •~ti.f~. .//~..a JS"7j.. ~.T, •ry •~':f';.: •L .:Gw' ~~r„~ i,. o~. '~y5',~ _ •if. ~
.,F{~~a''.+~s~:. 1~ .Z .'to.~i. ~~:.--i.'•, .1'., y~ ~.t ~.~.ti ~ •F~:% :r' ,G-, .'e
T ~ S: .r1 : a: ! ~ : c~„' •i.' '.t; 'i ;~i :$i t1 , . .->t .'r. ' . - ~
~c~ .y~,~,+K• .?l~. .i ~ i ,rr s . 't=. '>•'j' v . ~ ` v t;' r. ~
_7'.S~"'r tiK .tiY~.~rti~t ~~.,;}-;,.h.. .i~ .rMr.a';~? rr... !,~"'`t, ::S i~• ~:r ~~,r.p~ 'r ) s!
.,d~;er: ~•.~4 a ~i~t:-,: ~r° ;4;•~C~ a:~~::t~ y;:;}-~.:.~!`vY .1 ~{IL - ;M1~4 't'• '1~ T~ f~,~ :i,• A'.
'~~,i ~t~~':~t:1~•i.i r.i•i~x. ..?w: 'f.•~. ~ K~i,~...t'F ?.rY. I:~,. ,j ~'r ;~1. t
- 'ih• 'r t~....< : ;~7.~ ~ , . • ~~.f
~~.~i~ ,~L~'Y:'4?.3,` r'r .r? r'~ti. ,~~i~, r.i-• :•i•a' .:i:y`:~~.s~~ t•oi•:Ji v..~.i~.h~'i .S; ,1, .,V{`..1.•..~: :V:.=~~~ -'1~^ ,'7''s~~ ~ •a. _ . A ~ .
`:^;~~;li:~.l e4i.~1~'P. ~~~:.,a.':'~}.~.,'P'• ~.~...r. r../~!~-1:;~~
~~5~.~ 'k:: a41tn~.~' •..f'. .~_.t~~' •'j~~1. .1 _ t.. t{ y~,t..l" t :0.~~~ ~"j'.~ . ~q~ _ , •:y I
:~f ~'T;.~r~ ;~'~j~ .r4.. 1• I ~.;fr ..yi.o I~ `~..-de=iK•~y .j :ir [<r ~~1.: 1I, ~ `1~. a~,•:. •
~ •~u.•.' .
.y•~ •i .i+`.' t ~ ~C.r•«:. e r . ~ i I r{v..
~ t L, ~~'Y;,:. , .i' ..''1 J`~'~~ tl - .r ~
t ~ l • ~ ' vi~ ~ ~ Y'~ 1 ~1~~.- : ~w..
t_~,aL~` ~~id' :~.a +~.~;~N If'• 'f;'''••~:. ~~"~;~1'• :s1.'.~Sr:.~•~~: ~:pi ~,ra ~ti~ ~ ~ ~i, rh).!: .a.-t.,:°' . I
~F~'..x~~,r: i a:•' ~,.iaLY, .t~i~.; :V.~: .4~ :~l•'.+.tY.. :.a.. ti~~'a,,;;~1 f1 .n, ..~lt„ . ..e - j. .j!- :C~
_ • , _ ~ , a G • S P : ''1 ~t ' ~,x..~ .~`;t e r+1.
.~i-~.y.~,,_. t a;~,~r .i ..~w,~.Vy~:.~.<~ y. .'•LE ~i~ ' `!rl ~.V~1 ~ : .~1'~ 4 i: ,F~Z.~~',~.1~ ~,I M ~ y~
•~'f Y~ 1r~:r.F~ ri s- -',.qi:,,.a. - ~.,.---~'t.,i„ij~••~j`~~I i ,.rts ~ x(f . r~r,",~.~.w•,.. f 7,,irt •r~L ~iT,
* ~ 't••~~k xF H,::.
lMi~~.. ~•~.^.~°l~'~4~'F'v.~'+.fy.~J~.f:y.; AI ~~L. ~.i~r.. 'li;' 4.1 ~J•~ 4~:T.' ~':N ,1...y~ ! ^'y`„',.).~...~5 s ~ a •1',:
~tiN~+~~v.~ ?•..:n!t. vf'M, ;.~,•7n, ~,`!~!-K' ^I*;r. r~.~~,r ft .r ° p ~ U:,; ' 1 f ' t i, r ~ '.'.I' ~ I~,
~.l~ ..~,•r. .`v I~ ~ 'f)[.~~' y~ y.i.a.`S:':i~ ' ;Y.' i.t~~~ ~ ~~.1• :l! f ~.i vnl-.:~ ~e •
~J F b ^ I ~
?}.+w'i~. ~it ' t ."r•ii: t1•,~ 'a.~ ~,)a. ~e .y . .
3_~ .L ~..P1°~ •v t :,j, ivj;j:• t ~V •.r~ ~o
~,.-y~~,rsf.Ci1;~ 'Si'~t,~ t. •rc. :j``-1%•~.}~ 'y;;4....3..~ :>"~,1~~. r, y:t+ .
k,ti,`F,Y•y: :,S ~.y, :ti..~; ) i.I. ~`i:1~a. .J•' ` ~
~`~•~w1 A:~.~• ~~J ~ft~. .-~.1~~r.:. ~ .~'a.. •7 ?~l.'.h'1: j ' ' i •
- - :~t= .;:~7~ F '•;~<!9. ••c, .~G~
.~y ~ . : i ai'' ~ • rrt.'l.~r. ? ...4' : ~ ' , ' .
'."3" a 'S~"~~ ~:?~C. •-1 ,~.i' ~~'^r~ S" •f :'i'':~ .:~;y •i
J~;• M.: '~i'~ w' '4%"i~,y I yi.~ ~t: ~I .I ~ Y; . :
. ~15~. ~ ~ '1 .V . •.5~ t : ~ . i~ }~i~~~ . "y.r•: s. . . r'! . • 1
'!n ,1:• • I~;~' ..!.Nl.;~j^. ~ -S'..1` ,.1',~" 1.' 1.'
~~i,~~i~~~a .'~y.~'` ~r ~ L~ t'„ ~ ' ~ .'t„7t7{•~nJ~~•t .7 ,~ty.' •r , ~ t~ ,
i ~ /w) • } ~ • • i
~~aP'}: ~f•l~l~I c•~:, ~i'~it ,~p~~f•S'••?~r...~.'~~,::j~Y" f::' I I~~..C~" :1'+ Pi~ , . ,1c ~ti',~ ~ i. '
~q"i. ~.l ~ ~ l, - ~~l^f.~ .t~ K ' ~ ~~~Y~^`ae..'~'~.. i••:_ >,rr: 5~' 1` .i~ .
~ T: + • t :,'t~ ~ 1 . F~^, ti~ 1.
i S Y•+,r~~,,• '-~1~1.~~- P akr.;i , . ~ ~e~4f. ~1r+~ ~?'•~rn~{ :•ri,~. ":5~~• .1 ~ ~ ,i K.~~ ; ~:~i I _ ,.5 . : 5 .a ~ , ~ t f~,
4'~. ~~hti~i'Li 'n:~ i. ~ , S ,~w.,., . r~ ~ .Jr' ~i ~'r.r,• ~j:'.. ~'In S.}i.
~`~~~,~,Y -1_' .:i. ! ' 'i :1 i 'o: ..i., r: ' 'N.~i ~ ~',xt F~ . :i~' .ri.~~ .t. F~
~~'~I.~ r • . . r ti:'['..'. . • '.y ^ r 7 it~ ip.
l. s , ..4 !t.~ ~ . . ~a~:u'_:;~n' 'f • .i: ° L ~ti .i;?i
!s r: ot'i+' , ~ ~ 1 . • , . r ~
q
, '~r. Mw 1i ,1.' ,i Y~ 'il~ '~,:W.'
q ~ i. • t~ ' ~ . " e:~." ~ ~1 12•'
~ f
.~,,.:•i~ i I ~i:i I ~~~r.~;,± , ~ . r' .1
,,,j -.:r, S~•% ~I
~
5~:1~: ~'s`+ ~r, .rd t :Ttl;,.r :q.. ~
'5 ~i.. . ~ • . a J.~ . _ y.. ~ ; : Gi :••~;~i.~•, ~
( °1• ..c: i:'', ..~'r' a ,,>i, ,'r_ ~.t~: .1 •o.
c.;i
~IJ~ r~: ~ ~,raZ '~t'ti~ l"1 F:'rl o-., ~a., ..I'.-~i. ..-1'~~1. '>,F` w` ~.t a ..1 ~r.'`.
Pa ' 3',r~~ ~ -n .~~1' ~e. .1i~. r,~' •i~c~~ ~1,~ ~,C.S ~ .'~:'.r': .~..j. 'V.•y, :.h i.• .Y ~i~. !t?.."'
~~"d ~ j•r~, `...s~;Y,' a~ 1'.~ ,e',1~', .e.,'x:. ,t,'r t• ~ ~ i'l •~~`v
~j~.y~ 1. . ~1~ 1' y ? i i • ' h~ ~ : ~7 . ~V' .1 . . ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~`'r.{~ n ~v
y.," ~•T,"••:.^.r 1'•i':'T :L, ~iL^f..r.~ i. .b
' j1`d'S- y'~ •t. ;•~~a••~•4 _1 1'°:,:. .42^ ,;i .i~ c.z•.1 ':,i,• - ..•S'-. I ',4,•
y _,T.,~.,~.~~ •~r:.'.i "7,.:ut~a~~.~~.~~~'S[. ,~~i~'i• ~~•w. i r~i. d .•.,,ye.4•;p'_-~ a•~ '~.r .:141";i"~r~°~• :.~~.x.•~.~•:r:..e'~':~~~, '•~•a S'r'~j.~l{~ .
~~~..vl~., ~•'r .Yi~..il. _ r r .'~r,r..l .~...y~'.. .~:`'•:~+,ii~ i±/: 1.~ .y (i7 ;~,t~4 fi; 'I.' '~.•~t. .at. : .n . . .
~'J :i~~ ~t;.:"'r='-_~-ly~ N:'~\,~;; a.~. .~.-i1 ~~••Fr~ ~'1..~:`'~},i`;S,7i !C~.'a .i;`.~.... i. .~C•" "1::, '„1% ,rl~,. •ti .
`~.f-
Y?~ ar~.~; ~r• n !r¢,~l..~j~~,,Li` ,iril.t" A'. : :i~: t;.. ..~~,i:- ...J: ) ~l~~_ •:I
.~fj_ lsr~° i~~,i• E a.r,1'Yi \.:{...1.n~i `..J' .:l..f..~~-~ ~b:...^~.. r~i.'~.:l~ 1.,;r~~1'. :i=~t`~t.. •j y,~.:i.. ~ 7~. SV~J'~;.Yt.•,'!~ ,
~ i,,.:>~ ~Y SY• :~A..L~~:l. ~.r~. n J~~. .i' j } .:'y~
yt!~'r' r ,~X!'~ity':.~.~.i~,i _ti.~~'. .K .~h., ,i'r'..1'ry/ 'i~? :1~• :~.~'?.'r I! ~+:.~1
~f,'~..I~.I'Y ' ,.~.~7~'' ~1 1 J-, ` r~t;~' 'ti~ :V J ~~•C- 'iVi~ f : 1d~ .n „1. . ~ , • ~ . ~ , : p. ~.~`y~' •'a ` k i
' Ij'~ i' ~~::;iC,T w~~.,a,•i ~•''l,..+.6.qF• : ie r. f~ .1•' 2 "t1 r.' u' ~~l:.. . ~i~,~t ~~~'~.~wi'..
~~;~~s. ~~.~'f•~_ _ 'l t' f `i . at''tlt,~rtit ii~jl``` e, ~ ~ r. i . ~ .+i'~' .r
1`~~~ ~ ~t. ' ,~'?:::ii_ }r V'r~.~. :c{ ri3,.~.:~,h;~t~~~"\~ l ~ R,~~• .r~ r :li-~:.~ •ti !t.~.~ ~~"r~.. .w.~~~'t',
~ • ~it ~w.~ ;,`..aJ.r I~ ~L ti i i i Yi~.''~.. ;
•YT.~ M f'• l . ~ ~ 't 1 ~ • F 1 1 J. 1~,•,v.. . 'I. .1 ~ ' , ~ • ~ 4
~.+t ,1~,.;Y;' ,t.,. t r.+a' :•n:f .t,M', • a~ . ~ ~ti. ' ~ 2 { ;£~5~.
j~~ :Ll~ 4 •"q`s,'~~ I. ii~f'~• t ~u'.; LI„~~t f';a •i ~ .t^ ~ .1 ~ 't .v
~ '1 :'i'. , ,+~,~;7',,i.' f• • i • ti i ~ i• . i :.t ; e.: f ~ . " . ; , r
' '4i.YTr~x;b}~~.>'..t.~x~1 i'.;~'{C•~~ :S~• r~ vs ~.d• • .r 1;~,''..'~L:
S; ~ x ~ :l.r i . r.- ~g a . "'e.• ti~ = •:xy:.' ~.t,..' t ~ ;c:,,:~:t: " ~t .~n. ,
' ~~.q~~j~f :p:'A7,:t :'A~~,rrlp•Q~~`' ~ ~~~SsC~1_w..i~ ~S~'~t ~1(~ ~~.~V.i`} 'F ~.r,r, i;.~.~~~f• ~i' t v , ~ ~ ~
.,y~,~ ~.r~e:.~. .t: . Ya t r. .i..5. l 1 :f 2~ ~it i. ~ G - f~ ,i,..j +r ~~~t:'t~t'r' •,bl.., ri ~ ' 1;. ~j"~:`{i.~,. .`t[v:T`,,~:'~ n
tJ,. N~~~,•'/'jk:+`i~M~ ~a.=f~ ^,~M ~ ~.~n<~~~fi'~'4,..~~'_"a,kbt!~:i ~n _~~~.~i..}.~ t~:~•i~ 1~.;' ~"~~tf;~'•~b,..3` ~1 ~•'i~P .1. p .v~. t ~ ~.~,:r....~' ~ (•.t~.~. "F:fri'
s. ~ s ~M~; .I. : ~,'i L,._~ 1~ j~ ~ .~.a~~w'„C.' ~ ~i.1}~~ .i~r• . ~ r. l,1 .~,n~^...~.~p t. 4.~~ ~a~n,•, • ~ _ p ~iA. ,l
A~titii~~~'~'.~i •~j,yl~ •.»i~.~~r . r~~.. '.J-t a~ '}A '„".I~,~ '~„r/.' z~;t ~.tr;i it~ .~.t.' ~k~li ~ ? t .t 14 41t.4 : 14.•V ~ ~.~~.~s ~,.rl',~:r?'n<~~~?trr'<T .L~...{?~:
~ r l G Rk' ~ °7~' :'2 ~r~~1 11' 1~- ~~''~'i' , ~ f~ ~ ~ .i ~ ~ . 4 ' ~ i•: -~'S~i. ~ ~
~ r'~'. h ~ ,g.~ht~7 .~~i~'•« g - - . ,
"a?• , . ' ~ , . ~ . • ' ^ . . . • • I
. ~ ' ;4._';~ : ' ; • . ' ~ . . .
~ . =1 ~ f i j • . t I ~a,~ . ~T'• .
a J 'Zj.n! q: ~
~~i..~,:~•. -~"J~'^ t .9 '.,-'wf`c'i ~4. .l• 'd' •t .1..'r.•0.,t,;.•~~• •.Y.:.r!~'S:.i~'+'•~';.• ~I ..n•'4•~' :},.r ~r{^~;JrYi'~'Yrt,'?
.~~::..41. :Ltl' ~ f~:'k.~~ 1. ~f~~ e~`~ !T.• 'i(•~}r ~ ' R. nl. . ~iY" ~f 1~~~ ~l. i~^ ~ InYr.~`w ~ 4..~:. ..r T.r` •~t~•;i""i(~~. ~J11:~1
•:1~'~'~Y.: l~ .1.~.\Y. .~yt:~ 'Z~~..i~ l~l.. ,~.Y:4 I j'}~~? ~ ~ .4!:. - ~`r~ .~~"i~~.~. tI~ ~ ~1
y~~~ Y. ~:~~•.~'.`a~ .a. +.:~'4t` 8.. .:.f- .,i^- •~i'. t.~ .7~~ •~l':.... ;{..r• .A.r;~1~
..u•~~J ;:t: .:d:iS:t.. .Z.r ~'r~. '•~~r.~....i~.P' .1'
~•f • . r 'tti 'L.1 1~~` t'a r.,: ~,...i t.~.., ` ~~e ..r.<•: 'r" . ~J. !_.i.'a .t'
!t'~ <x: 1: -.a ..'t.'f `'?.c i., , o.~:, ti Sn.:' ~ - . . t:..._,• ;•t ' ' ~ k . .t%:: t
i > .
•t'~ ~ ~ r i .;i.'i.':' .__.f..,s. :2.;,. :e.. . ~.a,. :.~-:,'1.., .v.,~, . v ,-;f 'si~q~i .
. . .
w,l~i ~F••.-, ~ :1 - -v`' 4 M •'e.. N • :r: t.Y ~'.1.. :',t" "f = . ~ -i'i',%' . 1:. ~.5 r. Sl .n :1~i: ~ :w; : .r
~1. .5'Y t . 5 ~ a. t ~J • r. .iJrJ • _.Y;-. P~'<`•~ q ~ i,:'`.., . ~ ~ .~i ~~h : ' ..~~t ' !
,~l:rt°' ~?v -•R.i'~ :t Y:.~' '4!•,~L~'-s;f ..V~.. ~ ~ f•.~i~ ~.i v~Y" ~'R;
l«J.44K.~~'1~, J. ~ ` ,a.YUT.y' , ~t~:S~ • :.~.~.r• 1~. .I.~~.:i•~.:y~'~~•'~ l~~.~*'~:~. .~v•"~~. 'i! .r:•~~i .
. . . . . . . . `is ~i;.1':e... .r~.. . . . ~r'„~.-.'t~ .n^.. . . , .r. , • . S ~ ~ 'k° , ,''r.. , J
~ MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Communiry Development Department
DATE: May 20, 1996
SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit in the CCII Zone District to allow for a
miniature goff course to be located at 600 Lionshead MaIVLot 4, Block 1, Vail
Lionshead First Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates/Charlie Alexander
Planner: Jim Curnutte
1. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE
Vail Associates and Charlie Alexander, the applicants, are requesting a conditional use permit to
relocate the Lionshead Miniature Golf facility, currently located west of Chair 8 in Lionshead. On
June 10, 1991, the PEC approved a temporary miniature golf facility in Lionshead for a period of
one year. On February 24, 1992, the PEC approved a request to modify and extend the
conditional use permit approval for a period of four years (until February 24, 1996). The
February 24, 1992 amendment allowed the course to take on a more permanent appearance.
• Instead of being a temporary wood facility, each hole was allowed to be constructed with
concrete borders. The 1992 amendment approval did not include the use of illumination and the
course hours were 9:00 a.m. untii dusk, daily, starting on May 1st and running through the fall.
On April 26, 1993, the applicant received PEC approval for an amendment to their conditional
use permit to allow for low-{evel lighting throughout the course and to extend the hours of
operation of the course until 10:00 p.m. each night.
Vail Associates has recently received approval from the Town to install a new gondola
immediately west of the Chair 8lower terminal, in the existing location of the Lionshead Miniature
Golf facility. This work is currently scheduled to begin July 8, 1996. In response, Charlie
Alexander (owner and operator of the miniature golf faciliry) is proposing to open the existing
course on Memorial weekend and use it until the new gondola construction begins. He is then
proposing to relocate the operation approximately 50' to the north, to the area occupied by the
existing Lionshead gondola maze during the winter months. Mr. Alexander is proposing to set up
the same temporary course that was used during the first year of operation.
As indicated on the attached site plan, the appearance of the new course area will be improved
with the addition of sod and numerous flower plantings. A split-rail fence will be located along the
east side of the course and a Lionshead gondola construction fence will be located along the
course's southern boundary. Pedestrian access wiil be maintained on both the east and west
sides of the course. The golf course will be illuminated at night by the lights on the existing
gondo{a building. No music is proposed. The appficant will utilize the same ticket building and 3
sq. ft. sign that has been used in previous years. The proposed hours of operation are 9:00 a.m.
to 10:00 p.m. daily, running through the fa{I, as weathes permits. The applicant has indicated that
in the fall, everything associated with this course will be removed, including the dirt and sod, to
•
1
allow for winter ski area operations to resume. The applicant intends to work with Vail
' Associates in the fail to establish a new, permanent location for the Lionshead Miniature Golf ~
~ Course, in light of the new gondola location, and will make an application to the Town for a new
conditional use permit at that time.
This request has been considered previously as a public park/recreafion facility, which is listed
as a conditional use under Section 1626.040 (D) of the Commercial Core II Zone District. The
temporary building being proposed will be removed prior to the ski season. Since the building is
i temporary and under 100 sq. ft. in size, it shall not be required to be reviewed by the PEC as an
exterior atteration.
11. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS '
Upon review of Section 18.60, of the Vail Municipal Code, the Community Development
Department recommends approval of the conditional use permit request, based upon the
i following factors:
A. Considerabon of Factors:
~
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of
' the Town.
The development objectives of the Town of Vail can be found in the
purpose section of the CCII Zone District, as well as the Zoning Title of the
Municipal Code. The purpose section of the CCII Zone District calls for a '
mixture of uses. Section 18.02.020 (B) 10, the Purpose Section for the ~
~ Zoning Title, calls for the provision of recreational facilities. Staff believes
that this proposal will expand the mixture of uses in the Lionshead area,
- as well as provide an additional recreational facility for visitors and
residents of Vail. During the time of its previous operation, the facility has
proven to be a positive addition to the Lionshead area.
I 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utiiities, schools, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public facilities needs.
Staff believes that the proposed conditional use permit will not have any
negative impacts on the above referenced services. Over the past several
years, the golf course faciliry has provided a positive recreational
I - opportunity for the public.
3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control,
access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and
parkinq areas. In 1991, and again in 1992, the staff was concerned with the possible
impacts of the miniature golf course on bicycle and pedestrian safety, as
there is a recreational path in the vicinity of the proposal. This concern
I has not proven to be an issue during the past several years of operation of
~
2
J
i ~
the facility. The split-raii fence aiong the eastern side of the proposed
• refocated golf course wi1{ separate pedestrians in the Lionshead mal{ area
from the golf course users. Staff believes that there is adequate
separation beiween the golf course and adjacent pedestrian ways, and
that the impacts of the proposed relocated golf course will not have a
negative effect on the criteria listed above.
Additionally, the entire skier run-aut area north of the Lionshead skier
, bridge, will be closed to pedestrian use this summer due to the
construction of the new Lionshead gondola. In addition to the new
' gondola building itself, the work includes a new tunnel connecting the
existing Lionshead gondola with the new gondola building, and the
reiocation of the existing bike/pedestrian path.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in
relation to surrounding uses.
The character of the area immediately south of the Lionshead mall is open
and natural, and is adjacent to Gore Creek. Staff believes that the
relocated temporary golf facility will not alter the existing character of the
area. Because the course will be flush with the ground and does not have
any artificial looking obstacles, staff believes that its design is compatible
with the character of the area. In addition, the applicant will provide
numerous planting areas for flowers, which wifl improve the appearance of
• the area during the summer. The temporary course will be removed in the
fall in order to facilitate normal ski area operations.
At the time of the initial application of the miniature golf facility in 1991,
there were some adjacent condominium owners who believed that the
noise from the golf course would be incompatible with the adjacent
residential uses. The Communiry Development Department has not
received any complaints related to the miniature golf facility over the past
five years. Staff believes that noise from the miniature golf course will be
less than other nearby commercial uses and that the proposed use will not
have a negative impact on adjacent properties.
B. Fin in
- The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following,findings bsfore
ranting a conditional use ep rmit:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes
of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes
of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed Iocation of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare ar materia{ly injurious to properties or
• improvernents in the vicinity.
3
t
~
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
~ i
i 111. LIONSHEAD DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS .
This location is not identified in any of the sub-area concepts, and the Design Considerations do
not specifically address miniature golf courses.
IV. C4MMERCIAL CORE 11 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The Zoning Code does not provide a specific parking requirement for this type of recreational
facility. Section 18.52.100 (C) 8 of the Zoning Code states that recreational facilities shall be
reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission, and any parking requirements shall be
determined by the PEC. At the February 24, 1992 PEC meeting, and again at the April 26, 1993
~ PEC meeting, both the staff and the PEC determined that since the proposed use is intended for
summer recreation use only, the applicant was not required to pay into the parking fund. Staff
~ does not believe that the proposed temporary relocation of the existing miniature golf course will
' necessitate parking to be provided for this use.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit to atlow for the continued use of the
existing Lionshead Miniature Golf Course until the new gondola construction begins, when it will
be relocated to an area approximately 50' north of its current location.
•
• '
4
'
YA1L ASSOC. 1 . ~
T ~
i
<
. ~ • ~
~ ~f~,~~c~ c~ t
s 16
, -
GONDOLA TERMINAL
,
7 ,,~w k~ C~v~tf
N (~v r4
j
1-~--° ~ - - 1
~
,r.._---- - -
~ ~'~(~~Q
_ ~ G( C~ ~
~
~ ,
f-
Pii~Y D 8 1996 -`1 J
1Z
i
' TOV COMM. DFU, DEPT,
~ \ ; ,o
% y w
•+.d . ,
G i.rS ~ AM+w~I
%
Po^ f;~'`J L " - C~
r 1
,
~ ON ,~/utFiOw ~ ~
w4I I
S 5'`~,e0, , F Rn.l
CNCt
~
. I -
~ ^ . . ' • - - - ~ ~ ~
r
, MEMORANDUM
~ •
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: May 20, 1996
SUBJECT: A request for a parking variance and a variance to locate GRFA in the front
setback, to allow for the construction of a new primary/secondary residence,
located at 2338 Garmish Drive/Lot 12, Block G, Vail Das Schone #2
Applicant: Dave Hilb and Greg Cummings
Planner: Jim Curnutte
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUESTS
The applicants are requesting parking and GRFA variances to allow for the construction of a new
primary/secondary building on a steep lot located on Garmish Drive. In accordance with Section
18.69.050 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code (see attached copy), the applicants are proposing
to co'Astruct two, 2-car attached garages in the front setback, with the face of the garages at the
property line. Section 18.69.050 (K) of the Municipal Code, states that development on lots
where the average slope of the site beneath the existing or proposed structure and parking area
is in excess of 30%, may include the placement of garages in the front setback (without needing
• a variance) subject to review and approval by the Design Review Board. The intent of this
section of the code is to aliow for the construction of a garage at, or near street level (close to
the road), in order to reduce the amount of site disturbance to construct a home.
Since the applicants' lot has an average slope greater than 30%, they are allowed to propose the
garages in the front setback area, however, per Section 18.69.050 (E), the maximum site
coverage allowed on the lot is reduced from the standard 20%, to 15%. The same philosophy
holds for the site coverage restriction as exists for garages in the front setback, which is to limit
overall site disturbance on steeply sloping lots.
The parking requirement for the applicants' primary/secondary building is five parking spaces
(three for the primary unit and two for the secondary unit). As is typical for the construction ot a
single family, primary/secondary or duplex build+ng, the applicants are providing a 2-car garage
for each of the dwelling units. As mentioned previously, these garages will be located right on
the front property line and due to the limifed width of the lot, there is no room for a fifth parking
space on the property. Additionally, due to the more restrictive site coverage requirements,
building height restrictions and the very steep nature of this lot, the applicants have very little
opportunity to fully utilize the allowable GRFA on the property. Therefore, approximately 815
square feet of GRFA is proposed to be located directly underneath the two, 2-car garages and
within the front setback area.
~
1
r
f Vell ' I
Thus, the applicants are requesting relief from Section 18.52.060 of the Town o
Municipal Code, which states that ail required parking be located on the same site as the •
use for which it is required. The requested variance would allow the applicant to place the
third required parking space (associated with the primary urnt) off-site, in the driveway
adjacent to Garmish Drive. '
Additionally, the applicants are requesting variance approval to place 815 square feet of ,
GRFA within the front setback area.
II. BACKGRQUND
On April 22, 1996, the applicants met with the PEC to discuss their requests for parking and site
coverage variances (see attached April 22, 1996, meeting minutes). In addition to their request
to locate one required parking space off-site, the applicants were requesting relief from the 15% ,
site coverage allowance in order to exceed the maximum site coverage allowed by 403 square
feet, or 2.6%. During that meeting, the PEC expressed their support for the applicants' proposed
off-site parking variance request, however, they indicated to the appficant that the findings
necessary to grant the site coverage variance did not appear to be met. Specificafty, the PEC
felt that the requested site coverage variance would be a grant of special privilege, inconsistent
with the fimitations on the other properties in the Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District.
The PEC also felt that there were no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances on the lot that
did not apply generally to other properties in the Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District.
Additionally, the PEC was unable to identify a physical hardship to support the site coverage
variance request.
Upon hearing the PEC's concerns related to the site coverage variance request, the applicants'
requested that the PEC table their application until the May 20, 1996 PEC meeting. The •
applicants indicated that tabling would allow them to modify their application to conform with the
site coverage requirements. In doing so however, the applicants were unable to fully utilize their
GRFA allowance and further amended their application to include the variance request to locate
GRFA in the front setback.
.
2
IN. ZONING STATISTICS
I' • The development parameters from which the applicant is requesting variances are highiighted
below in bold:
Lot Size: 15,246 square feet (the lot is vacant)
Zoning: Primary/Secondary Resideritial
Allowed Proposed
GRFA: 4,625 sq. ft. 4,139 sq.ft. *
Setbacks:
Front: 20' 0'
Sides: 15715' 15',17'
Rear: 15' 77'
Site Coverage: 15% or 2,287 sq. ft. 150% or 2,287 sq.ft.
Landscaping: 600/6 or 9,148 sq. ft. 790/6 or 12,051 sq.ft.
Parking: 5 spaces required 4 spaces on-site and
on-site 1 space off-stte
" 815 sq. ft. of this GRFA is proposed to be located below the two, 2-car garages, in the front setback area of the lot.
IV. CRlTERIA AND FINDINGS
! Upon review of the Criteria and Findings tor variances, contained in Section 18.62.060 of the Vail
Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the
requested parking variance and the variance to locate GRFA in the front setback based upon the
following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicin9ty.
Parking Variance
The applicants are proposing to iocate the face of the garages on the front
property line as allowed by Section i 8.69.050 of the Municipal Code,
- subject to review and approval by the Design Review Board. This allows
the applicant to reduce site disturbance on the property, but it also results
in the location of the third required parking space for the primary unit to be
off-site. Staff believes that the piacement of the two garages in the front
setback and the primary uniYs third required parking space in the
driveway, off-site, should have little or no impact on surrounding uses and
structures in the vicinity. The face of the garages, when constructed, will
be located a minimum of 24 feet from the edge of the asphalt on
Chamonix Road.
•
3
If the variance request is not granted, the applicant would have to either
add an additional garage bay, propose a parking deck/platform, reduce the ~
size of the primary unit to less than 2,000 sq. ft. (to reduce the parking
requirement), or move the garage out of the front setback area, further
down the hill onto the site. Moving the garage aut of the front setback, or enlarging the garage, would result in additional site disturbance on the lot, ~
which could have an impact on surrounding uses and structures in the
vicinity.
The Town Engineer has expressed a concern that if this variance request I
was granted, it may have a negative effect on the public way (cars parking
along Garmisch Drive) due to the proposed loss of the one required on-
site parking space. However, the Town Engineer has indicated that he
can support this request if the applicants were to agree to add an
additional four feet of pavement on each side of the proposed driveway.
This would aAow for the opportunity to park one additionat car off of
Garmisch Drive, in front of the building. If approved, this driveway
widening would allow for six cars to be parked in front of the garages
instead of the five as currentty shown on the plans.
GRFA Within The Front Setback Variance
As mentioned previously, the applicants are afso requesting a variance to
locate approximatefy 815 sq. ft. of GRFA in the front setback, directly
befow the two, 2-car garages. Staff befieves that it is reasonable to allow
the applicants to utilize the area below the garages as habitable living
area. The use of this space will have no effect on the mass and bulk, or
the exterior appearance, of the building. Due t9 the extreme steepness of .
this lot (5011/o+), and the more restrictive site coverage requirements, the
applicants are unable to fufiy utilize their GRFA allowance for this property
without using the space befow the garages. Staff believes the requested
variance to locate GRFA in the front setback will have no effect on existing
or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. All adjacent property
~ owners have been notified and no objections have been received by staff
regarding the GRFA issue.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
~ enforcement of a specified regutation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
Parking Variance
The parking requirement for residences with more than 2,000 square feet
of GRFA is three spaces, however, it has been very typical to build a twa-
car garage with new construction. Such is the case with the primary unit
in this proposed primary/secondary structure. When the garage is placed
in the front setback, the third parking space, (in front of the garage), is off-
site. Staff recognizes this as an inherent problem with the regulation and
feels that the strict and literal interpretation of the on-site parking
requirement goes against the intent of the steep slope regulations that
seek ta reduce site disturbance. •
4
The app(icants have proposed a large enough driveway area in front of the
garages to accommodate five cars. Thus, the applicants have provided
• nine parking spaces, four more than required, for the use of the two
residences. This figure will increase to ten if the driveway widening, as
recommended by the Town Engineer, is deemed necessary by the PEC.
Staff feels that nine (or ten) parking spaces will be adequate to serve the
two residences and feels that relief from the strict and literal interpretation
of the off-site parking requirement is reasonable in this specific case.
GRFA Within The Front Setback Variance
Staff believes that the degree to which relief from the strict and literal
interpretation and enforcement of the seiback regulation is being
requested is not excessive and is reasonable in light of the special
circumstances of this site. As indicated previously in this memo, the more
restrictive site coverage requirement, in conjunction with the extreme
steepness of the lot, provides a hardship to this applicant regarding their
ability to fully utilize the allowable GRFA on the property. Even with the
variance approval, the applicant wi(I be leaving nearly 500 sq. ft. of GRFA
unused, due to the site coverage, setback, and building height restrictions
that exist on this property. Staff believes that the granting of this GRFA
variance would not be a grant of special privilege and would allow the
applicant to build a reasonable amount of GRFA on the property, thereby
achieving compatibility and uniformity of treatment with other
Primary/Secondary zoned lots in the vicinity.
• 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
Parking Variance
Staff does not believe that there will be any negative impacts associated
with this proposal regarding this criteria.
GRFA Within The Front Setback Variance
Staff does not believe that there will be any negative impacts associated
with this proposal regarding this criteria.
- B. The Planning..and Environmental Commission shall make the following findinas
before.granting a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. ,
•
5
i
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified •
, regulation would result in practicai difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions i
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not appiy i
' generally to other properties in the same zone. ~
~ c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
~ other properties in the same district.
~
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION I
Staff recamrnends that the PEC approve the variance request to allow for the third required ~
parking space (for the primary unit) to be located off-site and the variance request to allow for '
GRFA to be placed within the front setback. Staff feels that the granting of the variances woutd not be materially injurious to properties in the vicinity, in fact the variance would allow the
applicant to develop the site with less site disturbance and impact to existing vegetation and
surrounding uses and structures in the vicinity. Staff feels that there is an inherent flaw in the
regulations that allow a garage to be placed in the front setback which, in many cases,
necessitates an off-site parking variance. Thus, staff feels that granting the variances is not a
grant of special privilege and that the relief associated with the variances is necessary for the
reasonable and appropriate devefopment of the property.
Staff recommends that the PEC members discuss the Town Engineer's recommended additional •
driveway width and determine whether or not the applicant shall be required to add four feet of
additional asphalt to each side of their proposed driveway. 4f so, this change must be reflected
on the final drawings presented to the DRB for final design review approval.
F:\everyorie\pec\memos\hilbcumm.520
I
-
I
I
.
I
I
i .
6
• `
ZONING 18.69.050 Special restrictions for deveIopments on Iots - where the average stope of the site beneath the
existin_g or proposed structure and parking area
is in excess of thirty percent in Hillside Resideri- tial, Single-Family Residential, Two-Family
Residential, and Two-Family Primary/Secondary
Residential Zones.
The following additional special restrictions or require-
menu shall apply to development on any lot in a Hillside
Residential, Single-Family Residential, Two-Family Residential
or Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Zone Disuict
where the average slope of the site beneath the existina or .
proposed structure and parking area is in excess vf thirty
gercent (307c):
A. A soil and foundation investigation, prepared by and
bearins the seal of a registered professional engineer shall
be required.
• B. fioundations must be designated and bear the seal of a
registered, professional engineer.
C. A topographic survey prepared by a reListered surve}or,
with contour intervals of not more than two feet (2'),
shall be required.
D. Structures must be designed by a licensed architect.
E. Site coverage as it pertains to this Chapter, as permitted .
by Sections 18.09.090, 15.10.110, 18.12.110 and _18.13.090, is amended as follows: Not more than fifteen
percent (15%) of the site area may be covered by build-
ings; and not more than ten percent (10%) of the totaI site
uea may be covered by driveways and surface parl:ing.
F. A site grading and drainage plan shall be required. . .
G. A detailed plan of retaining walls or cuts and fills in • excess of five feet (5') shall be required. H. A detailed revegetation plan must be submitted.
I. The Zoning Administrator may require an environmental
impact report as p;ovided in Section 18.56.020. J. A minimum of one covered pazking space shall be provid- ed for each dwellinc, unit. _
(va;t a.ss) 498-6 •
r
I -
HAZARD REGULATIONS '
K. Setbacks as the a 1 to 's hapter, as re ed b ~
, Y PP Y ~ C quir y
. Sections 18.09.060, 18.10.060, 18.12.060, and 18.13.060,
are amended as follows: there shaIl be no required front
setback. for garages, except as may be required by the
- Desian. Review Board. _ Garages located in the front set-
back, as provided for in this Section 18.69.050, shall be
' limited to one story in hei ;ht (not to exceed 10 feet) with
the addition of a_pitched or flat roof and subject to review
aud approvai by the Design Review Board.
L. Retaining walls up to six feet (6') in height may be per-
znamed in the setback by the Design Review Board when
associated with a permitted garage as referenced in sub-
section 18.69.050K. (Ord. 2(1995) § 1: 4rd. 13(1994)
18.69.052 Special resfricfions for development in geologi-
.cally sensitive areas:
A. '-~be folIowing maps are hereby adopted as the official •
maps of the Town, identifying areas of -aeolocyic sensitivi- ~
ty_ . 1_ The Debris Flow and Debris Avalanche Hazard
Analysis Map prepared by Arthur I. Mears, P.E., Inc.
and dated November, 1984.
2- The Rockfall IViap prepared by Schmueser and Asso-
ciates, Inc. and dated November 29, 1984.
3_ All areas' within the boundaries of the Geologic
Hazards Map, Figure 3, prepared by Lincoln DeVore
Engineers, Geologists and dated August 16, 1982.
B. L3-, any "ca Iocated within the hounda_riPC of the 'Lincoln
..:.ap o: -~y area ~-1°ntified as a debris flow or
dc3bris avaianche area by the Mears Map or in any area
i&-_ntified as a rock fall area by the Schmueser Map, no
inxnal application for a building pernut, grading permit or
me!jor or minor subdivision shall be approved until a
size-specific geologic investigation is complete. For the .
puerpose of this Section, a site-specific geologic investiga-
, tiom shall be deemed a detailed geologic investigation .
498-7 tvait i i-9s1
r
i
Henry Pratt said this is a fine design appraach, but i think thaYs a different context. i would
certainly encourage them to do it, but they are meeting the guide{ines and I don't think iYs fair to
require them to do it.
Jack Hunn stated that if they drew it up like Galen suggested, we might find that it works against
the proportions of the building it serves and will make ihe building appear top heavy. Right now
the window proportion is very appropriate to the scale of the building. This building shouldn't be
compared to a retail building.
Gene Uselton asked if ii would be appropriate to vote on the individual conditions.
Greg Amsden said no.
Henry Pratt asked if we had an amended motion, removing the condition on the planters.
Galen Aasland made a motion to remove the condition on the planters.
Gene Uselton seconded the amended motion.
The motion was voted on with 2 in favor and 2 against. The motion faiied. I
Greg Amsden asked for anather motion. ~
Henry Pratt made a motion repeating word for word the previous motion with ihe deletion of the ,
condition requiring the subdivision of the glass, and making that a recommendation only.
' Gene Uselton seconded the motion. I
• The motion passed by a vote of 3-1. Galen Aasland, although in favor of the gondola, voted
against because he was not in favor of the divided windows.
2. A request for parking and site coverage variances to a!!aw for the construction of a new
primary/secondary residence, located at 2338 Garmish Drive/Lot 12, Block G, Vai{ Das
Schone #2
~
Applicant: Dave Hilb and Greg Cummings
Ptanner: Jim Curnutte
Jim Curnutte explained the background of the memo to the PEC. He stated that the applicant is
moving the garage right up to the front setback. The problem is that the primary unit is over
2,000 square feet which requires 3 parking spaces. The request is to locate the 3rd parking
space aff-site. The fot is over 30% slope, and there is a more restrictive site requirement going
from 20-15°/o and the applicants cannot design a home to their satisfaciion unless they exceed
the 15% maximum site coverage allowance (by 403 sq. ft. or 2.6% of site coverage). Staff feels
comfortable ihat there are no negative impacts an either request and that the requests have no
significant impact on the neighborhood. Regarding the second request, the staff finds that the
degree is the minimum necessary and the staff is in support of the off-site parking request. Staff
has not be able to find that the criteria for the physical hardship has been met. Siaff fee4s ihat ,
there would be a grant of special privilege if we let them have more site coverage. Staff has
requesied denial of the site coverage request, but approval of the other request. Planning and Environmental Commission
• Minutes .
Apri{22,1996 $
~f
r
i
a.
Dave Hilb asked about the Town's intent of the site coverage restriction and how does this apply
to this site.
' Greg Cummings stated that having a gable end leaves a lot of room. The further you go back
into the site, the more retaining walls need to be added, leaving little or no room on the third floor
for a master bedroom. Dave Hilb stated that if they could reduce the building by a foot along the whole building, as per
the staff memo, this would work. However, the design doesn't' work according to Greg
Cummings.
Greg Cummings stated the main problem with the pian that staff is recommending, is that it
doesn't work with this design.
Dave Hilb stated that they worked very hard to make the height of the building come under the
allowable height. The site disturbance is minimal.
' Gre9 Cummin9s understandin9 is that a 9rant of a variance is based on three conditions. Item B
does apply in their situation as they are not harming the site.
Dave Hilb stated the property to the east is similar in design to what they are proposing.
Greg Cummings stated that they do not want a lot of retaining walls, which they may have to do.
Greg Amsden asked for any additional public comment.
Galen Aasland noted that the parking variance is consist with ather properties. He is however,
not in support of the site coverage variance because this would be a grant of special privilege. I
think tfiere are opportunities for additional GRFA within the existing building she{I, specifical{y
under the garage.
Greg Amsden stated that putting additional GRFA in the front setback would require a variance.
Gene Uselton agreed with Galen on both points.
Henry stated he had no problem with the parking. He asked Mike if the site coverage variance is
denied, is the parking aspect of it tied to this design and therefore is also turned down.
' Mike Mollica said you could approve the off-site parking variance and deny the site coverage
variance.
Henry Pratt doesn't want the applicant to lose the design effort and or the primary/secondary
zoning.
Greg Cummings stated that they feel this is the best design.
Dave Hilb stated that if they go to a single car garage, they could lose approximately 200 feet of
site coverage. Dave feels that they have a good design and he feels that they do meet the
criteria without the granting of a special privilege.
Planning and Environmontal Commission
r Minntos
April 22, 1996 9
.
~
Henry Pratt stated the issues he sees would be one of special privilege for the site coverage
~
request. He doesn't support the site coverage variance, as they do not meet the criteria. There
are alf kinds of options to use.
Greg Cummings stated that if site disturbance is the main reason, it doesn't fit into this criteria.
Greg Amsden stated that other properties have to maintain this 15% criteria and people are able
to follow this rule. !
Galen Aasland stated that many other properties have this same issue. °
Mike Mollica stated the problem that staff has is the grant of special privilege.
Galen Aasland asked if the applicant could modify the application and resubmit.
Mike Mollica stated that they could consider this and reapply.
Jim Curnutte stated that the new application would have to comply with the site coverage.
Greg Amsden suggested the applicant table this for now and reapply for a GRFA variance and
not have to go through the process all over. Greg stated other applicants have worked with
adding GRFA into the front setback area to make this work. Mike Mollica stated that the date of the next meeting for this would be May 20, 1996.
Henry Pratt made a motion to table this request until the May 20, 1996 meeting.
~ Gene Uselton seconded the motion.. ~
The motion to table this passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0. ~
3. A request for an amendment to Title 17 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code to allow for
the inclusion of a"Plat Title Format."
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther stated that staff recommended approval of this item.
Henry Pratt made a motion to approve this item.
Gene Uselton seconded the motion.
The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0.
Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes
April 22, 1996 10
. -.F
;
pSz1dE ° t ~ " CP Ao
w"'.°"?^'~ ~w.°e~ -
.i.. . i ~ ~ SGAIE, t• • A•-o•
DAIE C1F 5U1?VFV, 1/IBMS
LO7 13
G n~ ~ N _ _ • ~ ` ~~~ir.~w~
w+~wu~• ue ~ t 1~' ~i~ i
~ ~ $y6! -bpR L/JNDSGAPE LE6EPD
\ . F. O r.r.w....,swNa.
- • - / ~ •y e i
' _ ' ~ ~i ~ , ~ \ / w.w.~'w°..Ma.•w.u ~wrae~r
_ w~/
r /
~wort~n ~w[ -f r'~~ ~ ~ / • / ~ ~ ~occ wu ~ ~ i
? TAMIIY V IMLR . . • \ ~ .
/a~rY ~wqo c~? N I
LK Alu1D~f~ rw~ .
ue a ~oar r.su. i.c " - v- e.a~. x"~' ~ I
4M0[(4 • ?
e.eecwu.., ~ ' i ~
w~cwnwn • i ~ ` ` i , l ~ f~ 7 I
/
LOT 8 ~ i
n~• ! / ~~j s ~w / / / ~ i~, `~s~. ao. w I
41~~ i ~/t~• ~ ` ~ y \ ~ I~
fp r ~P'~ ~ '~x` ~
/ r
LOi It / ~ ~ j / j ~ ~ ? ~ d ~
~
~vAd
i
N"
LOT A
fIN~IN~1nIM• . \ N ~ ~fMr.xip~
~ GN~lIVM~~%lIf ~ ! `
~ - VAIL 12A5 SGNONE
FILING Na. 1
n , \
y i j os'.e
. •
• ~ . . . . ~ • •
~
. I
.,...~++ri • _ ' . '-t. ..,...wr~-+
~
....~.~wuc~•
..~...aMw-~
1M1 ~~SIL ~~IiFO
. ~ ~ '
i ' ' ~
' ' . . - . I
. ;
s^u•. w. u
' ~ruw+..wt«n.r. ....wlliHi• . -
noeuue+o'
~rawwwwrow ~-1! i
cawe. u.~ '
ewceurowms_. -.~~I~~•~ .•~wu..wn "
M1uoDxw.wWJ . ~ ~w'~W~r~wbwsl
" "
~ 1 -+wecrr t _ f~
~ . . "4 -.RVO~H~MtA~MIM!( Jr
_iAVnw
. N 3
11E8i ELEVATION 80UTN ELEVATION w• . r•r W , r•r p
a r
~ i
.
~
~ ~ ~irw~IS
. ]b/MLNrnR~
i,uysr.x S
_ e s~s~,.. .,....+nf •
ev`nr.w• ~ w~
= . _
. :
- - - ~ C~qti
- - - . ,
- - - -
. . y 'g
• wvaw.asow_ - - . ryMfAlla... ...~dll1K~ . _
, ~~ryr~,.w~i ' ~ a.u~n.•ww ~~j tl
I; ~ ~~'~}u1lA~e~
- ~
~4 W GON/ Ms1 ~
YMY/~AIYMI ~ ~ bwt. .
,..uW...,..., . ~ ~ . - MreaE .,..,.,ewiv !
- ~...~..K...~ i : ~
MO[f.M.. lMLlWMNMX ~M'N ; i
NvtDlww(u~fwwl~~ III _ " . .
. . •~{~y . .
~
I y 5 ii l:
. . . i~ ~
~ . . . . . .
. . . . . .
y a~rae NpRTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION
N'.r-C
ur . r.o~
I
r•.r _
_ - - r - '
nr~we
"
~ .
` W 1 ' 1
y , 1 ' , 1 Pl
Y ~
~
~ Y•GAR GARA('aE ~ 2-CAR GARAf~E i
~
~
.
i . ~
~ ~ . . . .
~ m
,
V
~ ~
. , ~
~
; ~
~
1 1 YCty~ Q
+
~ . . . ~ , Y 1* ~
~ a
c+~ ti d o ~
. ~V tl
uEar (sECONC,sRr) uvil C-AR.aGe LevEL aooR rt.,w EA6? tPPtNUItYI ItMT
v.• . nr
~
n
R
s (0
A
9 ~
:t
a,
c
~
~ O. :rw
~ ~ ; i n , ~
KI?fNEN KITGNEN
A 'u
m ~
11 C~.' . 1 ~ ~
ii N
LIVING DINING~ DimT4G LIVpJG
Rp01'1 RO01't ~ I ROOM i i RpQ11 Y ~
IJ~•~rY• 11 O~'~V-!) ~ ~rv.v.r i; sY~lvr O
11 ~ ll O i
1~ 11
il I!
l.'~ J .
DECK _I__ - -
~
~C;j 4w:a
YE6T l6EGOPIDA1RT111ifT MAIN llVEL FLOOR PL/W EA6T ff'R"ARY! WIi a
w•.r.~ ''~c~~i~3
~v tl
9
,
K ~
y ~r
a
~ • ~ . p
~ • •
• • ,
•
~ _ _ . . . ~
; hECNi rEcu.i ~
~ 9iI?R.4GE SfORAf E ;
i
mo
aoon /
'ov S~ ~C
~ ENTR
, , ~ - ,
~ ~ Ni ;Q 1 JI
; _ i~;• p ; ~
~
~ ATN .9AT14 O• ' N
~ ' Oe1W ~ V ~j I
\:l ~J
1
i MASTER PIASTER ~
_ i BEDROOI';,•` ~ BEDROCNI i
1 ~r.r'.e•i 1
~ f
i
. ~
.
. ~
. ,
1 ' . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i N b
0. >
--_~ra . . Y~_ o~Ai~3
11E8T (BECpNp,4R1') WIT IMfPER LEvlL FLOOR PIIW EAbT fPRV11Rr1tHIT
Va• . r.r
t
~
r 1^
i ~l J
L ~
J
i
~
• i ~
~
~
6AT14 '1 - 1 BATN 1
"p~ ~ Q 4?
'y ~ v
Cy ~
` aedRoon ~i tu Z ,I
-2 ir.r.w.r y / ' - ' _ ~ r.ra.r~a /1
~
I
. BEDROOPI'3
q 5EDROCf1 BED ~ROOI'1 a`
`
Y {
I A 1
DECK ••~"'H'~'•a,,~ I q.~, - DECK 9
I
~ -
A ^
~
YRBT f0ECO1IDARY/ llttT LGAR lEvlL iLOOR !'LAN EA6T (pRRIARY) WIT
V4'•f.1' N
rL1QN
tl y ~
~V tl
~ co
x ~
y
:a
~
i
~ MEMORQNDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Cammission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: May 20, 1996 •
SUBJECT: A request for an amendment to the previously approved site development plan for
the (nnsbruck Meadows Subdivision, iocated at 2772-2892 Kinnickinnick
Road/Innsbruck Meadows.
Applicant: lnnsbruck Meadows Development, represented by Bob Borne
Planner: George Ruther
1. BACKGROUND
• On Aprii 11, 1994, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
reviewed and recommended approva! (4-0-1), to the Vail Town Council, a request for a
minor subdivision and a request to rezone a tract of land from Primary/Secondary
Residential to Low Density/Multiple-Family generally located at 2772 - 2892 Kinnickinnick
Road. Included within the recommendation of approval from the PEC were numerous
conditions. Condition #1 (e) requires that:
~ "GRFA , site coverage and height shali be allocated for structures as follows:"
~
Building Total GRFA
Ernelo # Dwaltf Unlts Cradlt GRFA Allowed S(ta Coven Hai M
1 ' 2 450 . ft. 2,080 . h. 2,530 . h. 1,800 , ft. 33 ft.
2 1 225 . ft. 1,425 . ft. 1,650 . h. 1,400 . ft. 33 ft, '
3 1 225 . ft. 1,425 . ft. 1.650 . fl. 1,400 . ft. 33 fl. - I
4 7 225 . ft. 1,425 . ft. 1,650 . h. 1,400 . ft. 33 ft.
5 2 450 . ft. 1,680 . ft. 2,130 . h. 1,683 . fl. 33 ft. ~
6 1 225 . ft. 1,425 . ft. 1,650 . ft. 1,400 . ft. 33 ft.
7 1 225 . ft. 1,425 . ft. 1,650 . h. 1,400 . ft. 33 ft.
8 2 450 . R. 1,680 . ft. 2.130 . h. 1.683 . ft. 33 ft.
9 1 225 . ft. 1,425 sci. ft. 1,650 . ft. 1,400 . ft. 33 ft.
10 1 225 . ft. 1,425 , ft. 1,650 , ft. 1,400 . fl. 33 ft.
11 2 450 . ft. 1,680 . ft. 2,130 . ft. 1,683 . ft. 33 ft.
12 1 225 . ft. 1,425 . ft. 1.650 . ft. 1,400 . ft. 33 ft. ,
13 1 225 . ft. 1,425 , ft. 1,650 . h. 1,400 . R. 33 ft.
14 2 450 29. ft. 1,680 , ft. 2,130 . fl. 1,683 . ft. 33 ft.
~
F:\EVERYONElPECWIEMOS\INNSBRUCK.520 1
Additionally, Condition # 6 of the PEC recommendations requires that: •
•"Staff may approve up to 10' shifts in building footprint location from those shown
on the plan approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission on
February 28, 1994, or April 11, 1994, as long as the 15' separation between the
units is maintained."
• On May 17, 1994, the Vail Town Council approved on second reading, Ordinance No. 5,
Series of 1994, an ordinance rezoning a tract of land from Primary/Secondary Residentia{
to Low Density/Multiple-Family, generally located at 2772-2892 Kinnickinnick Road. The
approval of Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1994, included each of the conditions
I recommended by the PEC at their hearing on the request.
• On May 1, 1995, Bob Borne, President of Snowshoe Development, Inc., purchased the
development rights to Lots 2- 13, in the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision from the original
developer, Greg Amsden of AmBros. Deveiopment Corp. Devefopment rights to Lots 1&
14 were retained by Ms. Juanita Pedotto, the original owner of the Innsbruck Meadows
property.
• On June 2, 1995, the Town of Vail Building Department issued the first Building Permit for
construction in the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision. Since that time, five additional
Building Permits have been issued and construction of the units has commenced. To
date, five Temporary Certificates of Occupancy have been issued for units in the
Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision. Temporary Certificates of Occupancy have been issued
for Units 4, 5A, 56, 6 and 7. Temporary Certificates of Occupancy are pending for Units •
1 A, 1 B and 3, none of which are employee units. Each of these units is currently under
construction and nearing completion.
11. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUESTS
Bob Borne, the applicant and developer of the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision, is proposing to
amend the previously approved s+te development plan for the east-half of the Innsbruck
Meadows Subdivision. The proposed amendment includes, the relocation of the building
footprints for Lots 8- 13 by more than 10 feet from their approved locations, the relocation of two
of the required Employee Housing Units, and the realignment and change in surface material of
the required 6' pedestrian/bicycle path along Kinnickinnick Road. According to the applicant, the
proposed amendment to the site plan is necessitated by the need to provide access into the
employee housing unit garages and provide greater opportunities for landscaping along Kinnickinnick Road (see attachment #1
The applicant is proposing to amend the previously approved site development plan according to
the summary below:
I '
~
F:\EVERYONE\PECUNEMOSUNNSBRUCK.520 2
I
.
SummarX of the Proaosed Amendment
II ~ General
~ • Adjust driveway curb cut (ocations to accommodate the proposed building footprints.
Lot 8
• Change from one single-family with an EHU to one single-family unit.
• Relocate building footprint 14 feet to the west.
i
' Lot 9
• Change from one single-family to one single-family with an EHU.
• Relocate building footprint 21 feet to the west.
• Provide a one-car garage for the EHU.
Lot 10
• Relocate building footprint 8 feet to the west. Lot 11
• Change from one single-family with an EHU to one single-family.
• Relocate building footprint 28 feet to the south
Lot 12
• Relocate building footprint 25 feet to the west.
. L•ot 13
Change from one single-family to one single-family with an EHU.
• Relocate building footprint 21 feet to the west. .
• Provide a one-car garage for the EHU.
Lot 14
• No change
A copy of the proposed site plan, comparing the original approvar to the proposed amendment
site has been attached for reference. The original location of each building footprint is shown as
a dashed line and the proposed location of each building footprint is shown as a solid line.
The applicant has also proposed to realign the 6' wide pedestrian/bicycle path and change the
surface material to asphalt, instead of concrete as originaAy proposed. The path was originally
proposed to meander along the southerly side of the 20', platted, utility, drainage and pedestrian
easement located adjacent to Kinnickinnick Road. The applicant is proposing to relocate the path approximately 5' to 15' to the north of the previously approved location. The expressed
purpose for relocating the pedestrian/bicycle path is to provide greater separation between the
residential units and the bicycle path. Additionally, the greater distance between the path and the
residential units allows for more landscaping and berming to be placed between the road and the
residences, thus, providing additional buffering. The request to change the surface material to
asphalt, rather than concrete, is intended to reduce long-term maintenance costs and reduce the '
risk of cracking. Additionally, the applicant believes that asphalt wift be more pleasing from an
aesthetic view point, since the path will connect with each driveway. The driveways have been
approved to be asphalt. The proposed location of the path is illustrated on attachment #2.
~
F:\EVERYONE\PEC\MEMOSUNNSBRUCK.520 3
Since the applicant is proposing to amend the location of iwo of the employee housing units on
the east-hatf of ihe property, Condition # 1(e) of the original approval must be a revised. The ~
changes proposed by the applicant wili not effect the GRFA, site coverage, credits, or height
allowances. ii simply relocates the buildings and density. The table below iilustrates the
proposed amendment.
Changes are shown ;~~i~d text
~ Buflding Total GRFA
i Ernalc # Owellirkg Unks Credit GqFA Allowad Site Covon Hat frt
1 2 450 . h. 2,080 . ft. 2,530 . ft. 1,800 . ft. 33 ft.
2 1 225 .ft. 1,425 .ft. 1,650 .ft. 1,400 .ft. 33ft.
3 1 225 . h. 1,425 . ft. 1.650 . fl. 1.400 . ft. 33 ft.
4 1 225 . h. 1,425 . ft, 1,650 . ft. 1,400 . ft. 33 h.
5 2 450 . ft. 1,680 . ft. 2,130 , ft. 1,683 . ft. 33 ft.
6 1 225 . ft. 1,425 . h. 1.650 , h. 1,400 . ft. 33 ft.
7 1 225 . h. 1,425 . h. 1,650 , fl. 1,400 . R. 33 ft.
ir
1 060: ::fEi 'd :13E1: :::.>tt: t> :R:
10 1 225 . ft. 1,425 . ft. 1,650 , R. 1,400 , ft. 33 ft.
11 i 225 . h. 1,425 . ft. 1,650 . R. 1,400 . ft. 33 ft.
14 2 450 . ft. 1,68U . ft. 2,130 . ft. 1,683 , ft. 33 ft.
iii. STAFF ANALYSIS
RELOCATION OF BUILDING FQOTPRINTS
As indicated previously, the applicant is proposing to amend the location and orientation
of each of the buildings on the east-haff of the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision, with the
exception of Building #14. Building #14 will remain in its approved location. The purpose
for the change in building locations is to faciiitate garage access for each of the employee
housing units, and provide better views out of each of the structures. As originally
proposed, and approved by the PEC on Aprif 11, 1994, the required employee housing .
units did not have separate enclosed garage spaces. When the current developer, Bob
Borne, purchased the rights to the project from Amsbros. Development Corporation, he
added separate enclosed garage spaces for the employee housing units to make them a
better real estate product. It is staff's opinion that the proposed site plan relocating the
building footprints for Buildings 8-13 will not have any negative impacts on the adjacent
property owners. Staff would suggest however, that the PEC consider requiring additional (andscaping (evergreen trees) in the 20' setback area south of Unit #13. The
type of structure on Lot 13 has changed stightly, and in the staff's opinion, the new design '
warrants additional landscaping. Staff would suggest ihat two to three, 8' tatl
evergreens be required in this location. •
F:\EVERYONE\PEC\MEMOS\INNSBRUCK.520 4
~ While not a significant concern, staff woufd further suggest that the PEC and the
applicant discuss the proposed orientation of Building #11. As originally approved,
Buiiding #i 1 was not to be constructed parallel with the south property line of the
Innsbruck Meadow Subdivision. As proposed by the applicant, it will be constructed
parallel to the south property line. Staff would suggest that the building be rotated
counter clockwise on its southwest corner, to open up the area between Buildings #11,
#12, #13 and the existing Camelot Townhomes to the south. It is staff's opinion that this
reorientation would reduce the canyon-(ike effect created by Building #11 and the existing
Came(ot Townhomes, as wetl as improve the drainage possibilities beiween Buildings
#12 and #11.
Lastly, staff would like to point out that the proposed deck encroachments into the 20'
utifity, drainage, and pedestrian easements will require encroachment agreements
between the Developer, the Town of Vail and the Utility companies. HistoricaUy, each of
the affected parties have granted encroachments into this easement. The encroachment
agreements will be required prior to issuance of Building Permits for any of the proposed
Buildings on the east-haif of the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision. The only exception to ,
this requirement would be Building #14.
REALIGNMENT OF THE PEDESTRIAN/BICYCL PATH
Staff has reviewed the proposed relocation of the required 6' wide, pedestrian/bicycle,
path. Upon review of the proposed relocation, it is staff's opinion that the new location
will not negatively impact adjacent property owners. in staff's opinion, the new Iocation
will improve the overalt development as additional landscaping and buffering
• opportunities will be increased. Furthermore, staff feels that the proposed change in
surface material from the originally approved concrete to asphalt is a positivE change. In
discussions with the Town Engineer, the use of asphalt as the surface material for the
path will be less costly in terms of maintenance and less prone to cracking.
CHANGES TO THE APPROVED EMPLOYEE HOUSING LOCATIONS
According to the original approval of the innsbruck Meadows Subdivision, the Developer
is required to provide four, deed-restricted employee housing units on the lnnsbruck I
Meadows property. The four employee units originally were to be located in Buildings #5,
#8, #11 and #14. The applicant is proposing to amend the previously approved site
development plan, in part, to amend the location of fin?o of the four required employee
housing units. The applicant is proposing to move the required employee unit in-Building
#8 to Building #9 and the required unit in Building #11 to Building #13.
Upon review of the proposed change to the iocation of the employee units, staff can find
no reason to not support the applicanYs request. Staff would like to suggest, however, that the applicant is bound by, and obligated to, an employee housing unit phasing plan
for the project. In order to comply with the required phasing plan of the employee housing
units, the applicant must construct an employee housing unit this building season.
Therefore, should the Planning and Environmental Commission approve the applicanYs
request to amend the approved location of the employee housing units, staff would
suggest that a condition be placed on the approval that the next Building Permit issued for the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision be for a buiiding that includes an employee unit ,
. (i.e. Building #9). Staff further finds the request to be reasonabte since the overall intertt
• of the requirement of providing four employee housing units within the Innsbruck
Meadows Subdivision will continue to be met, regardless of the location of the employee
units within the project.
F9EVERYONE\PECIMEMdS\INNSBRUCK.520 5
'
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the applicanYs request for an amendment to the ~
previousiy approved site development plan for the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision,
located at 2772-2892 Kinnickinnick Road/Lots 8-13, Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision.
Staff believes the request is both reasonable and appropriate as described in the Staff
Analysis, outlined in Section III of this memorandum. Additionally, pursuant to Section
18.66.080, Hearing Notice, the Community Development Department has notified
adjacent property owners of the applicanYs proposal. Staff has not received any negative
input from the adjacent property owners.
, Should the PEC choose to grant an approval of the request, staff would recommend that
the approval carry with it the following conditions:
1. The applicant submit to the Town of Vail, an engineered drawing indicating the
proposed driveway configurations for Buildings 8-13. The plan shall include
garage slab elevations corresponding to those indicated on the site plan, as well
as proposed grades for the driveways. Driveway grades shall be those approved
by the PEC on April 8, 1996. The plan shall be reviewed by the Town Engineer.
2. The Town of Vail Fire Department sign off on the driveway plan.
3. Prior to the request for a framing inspection of Buildings #14, #12, #9 and #8, the
applicant will sxecute an encroachment agreement between the developer, the
Town of Vail and the utility companies for each building.
4. The applicant's next request for a Building Permit be for a structure containing an •
employee housing unit, to insure the compliance with the required employee
housing unit phasing plan. Additionally, it shall be the applicanYs responsibility to
proceed with due diligence towards completion of that employee unit.
5. Condition No. 6 of the Planning and Environmental Commission's
recommendation of approval allowing staff to approve shifts in the building
footprint location of up to 10' from those shown on the proposed site plan and
approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission on May 20, 1996, be
removed. The site plan proposed by the applicant shall be the site plan
constructed for this project per the dimensions and elevations indicated on the
site plan.
r k Me dows Subdivision
aII buildins within the Innsb uc a
6. As ori9inallY conditioned, 9
shall maintain a minimum 15' separation between structures, including all decks
and cantilevered portions, but excludin9 eaves. •
F:IEVERYONE\PEC\MEMOS\INNSBRUCK.520 6
x ` ~ f.-•„ ; - ,
INNSBKUCK MEADOWS UCVCLOPMGN7', IN('. 6~~
P.O. BOX 4205
1-
VAII,, COLORADO 81657
303-476-5263
Town oC Vai!
Planninb and Environmental Commissian
Frontagc Road, Vail, Cotorado 81657
C/O Gcorgc Rulhcr, Town Planncr
Marcli 23, 1996
Dear George,
13y this letter 1 am formally makii ig application for an opportunity to go beforc the
Planning and Environmental Commissic n on April 21, to ask approval for miilor site plan
changes of the approved plan for Innsbr ick Meadows Subdivision.
'Cl e changes retlect movement of some of the units by more thaii over teii feet, and
• switch of ,,ome of the duplex locations w: th singie family locations. Please understand tliat
we arc not ptanning to add or subtract d wefling units. We merely arc changing tocations
so as to accommodate driveway access to the EHU, to which we liave :icided garages.
As you know there were no garages associated with an EHU in thc original plan and
all of tliese EHU units do now have one garage space each. We will uot be adding any
GRFA, w 111 have proper site coverage and all of the roads and garage slabs will work witltiu
the proper guidelines.
George, l hope that this application Ietter which is accompanied by the required
$250.00 fee is sufTicient. There seems to be no specific application for this typc of request .
but I sliall be more than glad to add anything that you need to it or fill out an application tt?at is iiaore suitable if such an application exists.
1 wish to take this opportunity to tank you for your considcration,
Res c ~ Ily,
~ ~
(nnsbruck Meadows Developmcnt
• by: Robert Borne, Pres.
~ . • ' •
~
ao
~
o N0
~'°a~'d•e•TMl'',-~~ - ` , d'
:i , ~
to
~9ikePath 4 f ~ ,
eviwsiy Approved Dnveway - }l~= PsP
~ aik, Falk OD
RoposedDriveway--
f d
Lot 14 O
Indicates Previously Approved Building Footprint
lndicates Proposed Building Footprint,--~ y
,
i ~ / ~ ~ ' \ - ? ~ ~ t ~ a
Lot 13 a
Lot 9
i~ ~ / • SOPIMAqYOFPROPOSEDCBANCFS (Yi
1 ~ LOt { I ~ • Raiign Aike Peth ud eNnge tu Asphdt Muend
~ lAi $ ~ / . Adjust driveway I.oations Q
~ ~ / , • Chsnge hom 2 UniG lo I Unii a
~ • Relocate Building up w 14 fea
~ Le19 Q
Change ftom 1 Unit to 2 Units a
Anioute 9uS5din8 up ta 22 (eet Q
" / • GiveEH.Uaax•ar8vage ^
Lot l0
Lot 10 Reloeae up to t rcn
_ _ ~ \ ' \ / ~ •ry'~ I.ol Chli
Inge hom 2 Unih to 1 Unit 1' •~.1' ~
• Rdou'e BuiWing up to 30 fed
..et li
1 Reloute Building up to 23 fea ~
Lot IS
\ • Chang Rom 1 Udt l0 2 Umtt
~ / . RAoute Building up w 30 Ret Z
~ Y . Give E.H.U. a one-car gnagc
' Noc~ge 36, ~
- Approvedl :~1` -
~°"h
Pro osed Overla N
a
V = zo.o'
AU ]
p
,
~
MEMORANDUM
• TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: May 2Q 1996
RE: A request for a Sign Code Amendment to allow for an amendment and reorganization of
Title 16, Signs, Chapters 16.20 (Sign Categories) and 16.22 (Sign Categories for the CC3
and ABD Zone Districts).
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUE5T
Over the years, the Sign Code has been amended and zoning districts have been added to the Zoning Code,
which have not been reflected in the Sign Code. This has created some inconsistencies within the Sign Code.
In order to correct these inconsistencies and make the Sign Code easier to read and understand, staff is
proposing to reorganize the code. The amendments and reorganization are accomplished without changing
the specific sign regulations or definitions. Since several zoning dislricts have been added to the Zoning
Code, but have not been reflected in the Sign Code, there are some districts which were not represented in the
Sign Code. Therefore staff has added those districts which aze not represented in the Sign Code by creating a
table which shows the zoning districts and which signs are allowed in each district. We also grouped together
• similaz districts that would have similar sign requirements to reduce the bulk of the document.
. Some changes were made to specific sign categories, in order to be consistent with recent changes to the Sign
Code that were approved by Town Council. The changes include revising language that required Design
Review Board approval for signs in order to allow staff approval of signs per the recently adopted sign code
amendment (adopted Apri12, 1996).
The regulations for a Temporary Site Development Sign are being amended to allow for a development sign
on all residential properties. The sign would be limited to 6 sq.ft. in size and the information on the sign
would be limited to the project name, project address, and the display of permits.
A copy of the proposed changes aze attached. Items that are stricken are being removed from the ordinance
and text that is shaded indicates new text being added or zoning districts being added that are not presently
part of the code.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment and reorganization of the Sign Code.
f:\everyoneVec\memos\signcode.520
•
r
•
. . Chapter 16.20
;
SIGNO=:~~~':~":~`~r':~:CATEGORIESsr~e::>::»>::;,.,::.>d,~:.,.,~~~~!T~
, ~
' Sections:
16.20.010 Oesi a>..-o::>:,
n..
~
::;>~?t~t~;~d<;~..: ..~:::~o~::~:;~ <::~~i~`>~.~.. .t::~. ~
16. . ,
. . .
16. . ,
16• , pemnsamsts bammmmes s amid bkintimir.
16.20.040 freestmaidimag sigmismMift dii-ectoi y stm
flFoor nvoitkenamst buildinr.
16.20.050 fa-eestmanding
, aigiiasoSixmgie business use.
i6.20.055 6*s fHied, . , .
1,6.20.060 •
16. .
6.22 .
16-.20A30 ,
. . ,
. . ,
.
16-.20.190 .
1 ~ i
i
~ 16. .
' atec~-
16.20.010
~
t 0:::a1~~~~:~:::~'
. ~
1:>
. . .
Zoning Districts Signs allowed in the indicated zoning districts subject to t6e purpose
statement for each sign and subject to the corresponding regulations for each
sign.
CCl(Commercial Core 1) Accent lighting
CC2 (Commercial Core 2) Building identification signs*
CSC(Commercial Service Center) Daily special boards
~ HS (I3eavy Service) Display boxes
PA (Public Accommodatioa) Flags, pennants, banners, and bunting
HDMF (High-Density Multiple-
Famity) Freestanding signs - Joint directory sign for multi-tenant building*
.....j Freestanding signs - Single-business use*
. Gas filled, illuminated and fiber optic signs
Murals and supergraplucs
~;~?aN~g~ Political signs
Private no parking signs
........Projecting and hanging signs - Individual business within a multi-tenant building*
p"1qNse *tWK.regVIW0" Projecting signs - Single business use*
Projecting signs - Joint directory signs for multi-tenant building*
Projecting and hanging signs - Arcade*
Public information signs
Residential nameplate signs
Sign program
- Temporary site development signs
Traffic-control signs for private properiy
Wall signs - Joint directory signs far a multi-tenant building*
Wall signs - Single-business use*
Wall signs - Arcade*
Wall signs - Individual business within a multi-tenant building*
Window signs
Other temporary signs::pi"';i';G:1;~:~t
• 2
I
I
Zoning Districts 51gns allowed in the Iodicated zoning districts subject to the purpose
statement for each sign and subject to the corresponding reguladons for eac6 I
sign. •
~i:(~i~ettle~~j. . Accent lighting ~
~~~te?1~E~?:~t~ Murals and supergraphics
Political signs
1:~~~:~~iWPrivate no parking signs ;
Public information signs
R.CResidential nameplate signs
° Subdivision entrance signs
Temporary site development signs
p~.~::~~~ . Building identification signs •
~~~Flags, Pennants, banners, and bunting
Murals and supergraphics
Public information signs
Traffic-control signs for private property
Private no parldng signs
. ectt~.i~.~Public information signs
?~?Traffic-control signs for private property
. ...ti~A'ccent lighting
Building identifscation signs
Flags, pennants, banners, and bunting
ad~~yj Gas filled, illuminated and fiber optic signs
i~1a~:>::x~a Murals and suPergraPhics
Political signs
Private no parking signs ~
Public information signs
Residential nameplate signs
Sign PTOgram
Subdivision entrance signs
Temporary site development signs
I
I
3 •
Zoning Districts Signs allowed in the indicated zoning districts subject to the parpose
~ atatement for each sign and subject to the corresponding regulations for each
sign.
CC3 (Commercial Core 3) Accent lighting
ABD (Arterial Business) Building identification signs*
DailY sTecialboards
~ sr~d r~Iai~a~
Display boxes
Flags, pennants, banners, and bunting
Freestanding signs - Single-business use*
Freestanding signs - Joint directory sign for multi-tenant building*
Gas filled, illuminated and fiber optic signs
Murals and supergraphics
Political signs
Private no parking signs
. Projecting signs - Joint directory signs for multi-tenant building*
Projeccing and hanging signs - Individual business within a multi-tenant building* .
Projecting and hanging signs - Arcade* .
Public information signs
Sign program
Temporary site development signs '
Traffic-control signs for private properly
Wall signs - Single-business use*
Wall signs - Arcade* .
Wall signs - Joint directory signs for a mutti-tenant building*
Wall signs - Individual business within a multi-tenant building"
Window signs
Other temporary signs
: ;
" ><>::»:ii~d~r
~
~
evelopment Ds i Mct
S )
SDD ( Pecial D ~~~1~~'€~i.:::::::!~ ~
:a~~
, - :<.;;:.:><:::
, ::~,ed
uim~.~t~i v~ tb~ P~y a~d ~u, w~~:`~ x~~
s[at~~i~rtts o~~s ~s....aa~.~
*Wall signs, pmjecting and hanging signs, freestanding signs, or building identification signs or any combination thereof,
shall not exceed the maximum combination of one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business
abuts, with a maximum of two signs.
:'::i::::::::::::::::::i::'
~c~::i~:~c
~"t ,.g.::::::: : : :
This ~:~chaptcr conceras those types of permanent and ternporary signs requiring a sign
application permit under the provisions of this title. This chapter further includes the purpose of
each sign type, size, height, number, location, design and landscaping requirements, and special
i
p o :~~~»»:'«>.<;:;..;<>,,:::~::
r vis s
ions for each typ gn e of .
: :
. Display
,
. flags, pennanta, ,
~ 4
, . 5,~• I •
• , I
~
~
. ~
~
' I
r...--- •
~
. ' .
tCS+
.
~
. ~
I „_,,,.t ' .
I '
5
~ C. , ,
~ , Window ,
. ;
~ . Acccnt ,
, •
. , 14. Ord. U.
163$.$15 Accent lighting.
Accent lighting shall be regulated by the following:
A. Purpose. To illuminate display windows and/or merchandise;
B. Location. Subject to tiic-approve-ofthc design review boar~ pursuant to Chapter 16.16
of the Vail Municipal Code. The lighting source of accent lighting shall not be visible
from any public way as viewed from the exterior of the business and shall be located
within the interior of the building.
C. Design. Subject to design review board pursuant to Chapter16.16 of
the Vail Municipal Code.
(Ord. 5(1993) § 11.)
....tu.......
. enikalt
g . :.y : . .
???~`pc~s~ ; . : . . . : .
~ 9r.~~'::~~t
~...i€~~
• : : :.~i .
~ ~ ~ .
, .
.
P ~ ~
~s ..<..ii. ...a
::::i' :::i::
~::~s~
~
. . .
.
s~
~ .s:
~?t~..
,
- t...is,:s:fo~~x~. ....r>........g1.~»b~.................s;
16r29:625 Daily special boards.
Daily special boards shall be permitted under the following:
.
A. Purpose-to display the daily specials for a given lestam~mt 0.#ft::qzW::';;~i~€Q
.
B. Size-no greater than three f;:square feet.
C. Height-no part of the daily special board shall extend above six feet from existing grade.
• 6
D. Number shall be as follows:
1. One daily special board per ;9. 6.0cstamant shall be
pernutted. However, if a business has two consumer entrances on distinct, ~
separate pedestrian ways, a second daily special board sha11 be allowed.
E. Location, affixed to approved display box or attached to the front facade of the
establishrnent.
fG. Lighting, none. ,
of. Landscaping-no additional landscaping shall be required in addition to landscaping
previously required for display boxes.
(Ord. 39(1988) § 1.)
41,"16r.29:$29 Display boxes.
Display boxes shall be regulated by the follawing:
A. Purpose, to display current menus, current real estate listings or current entertainment;
B. Size, no greater than five square feet;
C. Height, no part of the display box shall extend above six feet from existing grade;
D. Number shall be as follows:
1. Pernutted, one display sign;
2. Conditional, if a business has two consumer entrances on distinct, separate
pedestrian ways, a proposal for a second display box *O:inxp be approved;-atthe
. The proposal shall conform to the other
provisions of this section;
E. Location, subject to design review board; ~
F. Design, glass-enclosed display box, subject to design review bom;
G. Lighting, indirect;
H. Landscaping shall be as follows:
1. A landscaped area of two square feet for each square foot of each side of a
permanent freestanding display box rnay be required at the base of the box.
2. If landscaping is required , a plan showing the
landscaping must be submitted by the applicant atthe
3. All landscaped areas shatl be maintained to town standards;
1. An area no larger than.6.5 square feet may be used within the display box to identify the
business.
(-Ord. 14(1982) § ld.g (part): Ord. 4(1975) § 2(I)(J): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(12),) 55: 16:20.039 Flags, pennants, banners and bunting.
Flags, pennants, banners and bunting shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to control the proper display and maintenance of national, state, or official tlags
and the ereetion and maintenance of pennants, banners and bunting;
B. Size shall be as follows:
1. Flags, subject to design review boaTd, except national and sta.te
7 ~
i
flags, which shall have proportions as prescribed by presidential declaration,
. 2. Pennants and banners, subject to approval by the administrator, subject to-review
bpthc design review boarct,
3. Bunting, subject to approval by the administrator, subject to design
review board;
C. Height, flag poles shall be a maximum height of thirty feet,
1. Flags shall have a minimum clearance of eight feet when proj ecting over public
I walkways; shall have a minimum clearance of fifteen feet when projecting over
vehicular streets; when displayed on flag poles, a minimum of twenty feet from top
of the pole to average grade, except for residential areas; projections over a public
way . . . .
2. Pennants shall have a minimum clearance of eight feet over pedestrian ways and
fifteen feet over vehicular ways,
3. Banners shall have a minimum clearance of eight feet over pedestrian ways and
fifteen feet oyer vehicular ways;
D. Number, subject to the approval of the administrator, subject to design
review board;
E. Location, subject to the approval of the administrator, subject to design
review bo ;
F. Design, excepting official flags, shall be at the approval of the administrator, subject to
reviz~the design review bvmd;
G. Lighting, indirect;
H. Landscaping, "Owdesign review board;
~ I. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. Flags, et al, shall be maintained in a clean and undarnaged condition.
2. Pennants, banners and bunting referring to community events or activities will be
allowed to be displayed for a period of no more than fourteen days. Christmas
decorations are exempt from the time period, but must be removed when their
. condition has deteriorated so that they are not aesthetically pleasing. Application
must state who wili be responsible for removal. In the event the pennants, banners
or bunting are not removed on the specified date, written notice by certified mail
will be given to the responsible person and the items will be removed by the town
at the owner's expense.
3. Pennants that do not refer to community events or activities and are for the
purpose of advertising may be displayed as flags subject to the appreroal oftlrc
- design review-board.
4. Banners, pennants, bunting or decorations of a temporary nature used for the
purpose of promoting community activities shall be exempted from the application
procedure described in this title; however, the written permission of the
administrator must be obtained subject to revicw-bq~tht design review boarc}.
5. The display of national flags shall be governed by the standard rules of
international protocol.
(Ord.9(1973) § 14(17).
~ 8
6: 16.20.049 Freestanding signs-Joint directory signs for multi-tenant building. '
Freestanding signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tenant building shall be regulated as
follows: ~
A. Purpose, to list all tenants within a multi-tenant building and to guide the pedestrian to an
individual tenant within the building;
B. Size, one square foot per tenant within the multi-tenant building, with a maximum area of
twenty-five square feet;
C. Height, no part of the signs shall extend above eight feet from existing grade; I
D. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business abuts,
subject to thcapproval of tre design review boarc~. If a building has two or more major
public entrances on distinct, separate pedestrian ways, proposals for additional joint-
business directories may be approved gn review
bowd;
E. Location, on the grounds of the building and adjacent to major pedestrian way which the
building abuts, subject to design review board;
F. Design, subject to design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Landscaping shall be as follows:
1. A landscaped area of two square feet for each square foot of each side of the sign
shali be required at the base of the sign, with a minimum area to be landscaped of
twenty-four square feet, in accordance with landscaping ordinance,
2. All landscaped areas shall be maintained to town standards as determined by the
administrator, subject to revisvp-by*tire design review board,
3. A plan showing the landscaping must be submitted by ~
the applicant at the time of application;
I. Special provisions, five squaze feet may be included in the freestanding joint directory sign
for the purpose of identifying the building, in lieu of any other sign for the same purpose.
I Joint directory signs must be kept current as determined by the administrator.
(Ord. 14(1982) § lf, g(part): Ord. 13(1976) § 3(part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(6).) ,
7: 16:29:859 Freestanding signs--Single-business use.
Freestanding signs, single-business use shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization being the sole business occupant within a
building. The identification sign or signs for a business or organization may include the
name of the business or organization and the general nature of the business conducted
- within or upon the premises. In no instance, however, shall the total portion of the sign
describing the general nature of the business exceed 40 per cent of the total area of each
sign permitted for this purpose. The description of the general nature of the business shall
be incorporated into the sign or sign identifying the name of the business and should not
exist as a separate sign;
B. Size, one square foot for each five front lineal feet of building with a maximum area of
I twenty square feet, with a horizontal dimension no greater than ten feet. The size of a
multi-paneled sign shall be determined by dividing the maximum size allowable by the
9 •
number of panels. Combined maximum area for more than one sign shall not exceed
~ twenty square feet;
C. Heigbt, no part of the sign shall extend above eight feet above existing grade;
I D. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business abuts,
as determined by the administrator, with a maximum of two signs, subject to revicrov-bp-dre
design review boarc~;
I E. Location, on the grounds of the building and adjacent to major pedestrian way which the
building abuts, subject to design review bowd;
F. Design, subject to tlie-approqal-ofthe design review hoard;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Landscaping shall be as follows:
1. A landscaped area of two square feet for each square foot of each side of the sign
and supporting structure shatl be required at the base of the sign, with a minimum
area to be landscaped of twenty-four square feet in accordance with the
landscaping ordinance;
2. All landscaped areas shall be maintained to town standards as determined by the
administrator, subject to teviewbydi design review bomd;
3. A plan showing the landscaping must be submitted by
the applicant at the time of the application;
I. Special provisions, one wall or projecting or hanging sign per street or rnajor pedestrian
way permitted in place of one free-standing sign.
(Ord. 14(1982) § 12, f, g, (part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(5).)
16.20:955 Gas filled, illuminated and fiber optic signs.
Gas fiiled, illuminated and fiber optic signs shalt be regutated by the following unless
. otherwise addressed within this title:
A. Purpose. To identify particular types of services, products or events;
B. Location. An sign located fixrther than thirty-six inches from the window pane and visible
from a public right of way shall be subject to design review beard
pursuant to Chapter 16.16 of the Vail Municipal Code.
C. Design. Subject to the he design review board.
D. Size: All gas filled, illuminated and fiber opric signs between five square feet and ten
square feet in size and fizrther than thirty-six inches from the window pane which are
visible from the public way shall be reviewed pursuant to this
section.
E. Special provisions. Gas filled, illumina.ted and fiber optic signs within the interior of the
business and not considered to be a window sign which have a total accumulative square
footage greater than ten square feet in size and which can be seen from any public way
within the town shall be prohibited.
(Ord. 5(1993) § 8.)
16.20.969 Murals and supergraphics.
Murals and supergraphics shail be regulated as follows:
~ 10
A. Purpose, to provide for decoration applied to building walls so as to enhance the
appearance of the building's architectural character;
~ B. Size, subject to tl c design review board; ~
C. Height shall not eJCtend above the plate line of a building wall;
I D. Number, subject to thc design review board;
E. Location, subject to fthc design review bo:nd;
F. Design, subject ta-thca, design review bo:tM
G. Lighting, indirect;
H
I . Landscapmg, Ah**design review bo:tr~.
(Ord. 9(1973) § 14(18).)
I
X4-0.16.20.079 PoL'tical signs.
! Political signs shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, window or wall-mounted signs with the intended use of denoting a political
campaign headquarters, party affiliation, or advertising of a political figure or cause;
B. The size of the sign shall be limited to twenty square feet. Combined maximum area for
' rnore ihan one sign shall be no larger than twenty square feet;
C. Height, subject to design review boar~;
' D. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business abuts,
subject to design review bomd;
' E. Location, subject to design review bomd;
F. Design, subject to design review bomd;
! G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Landscaping, not applicable; ~
1. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. If the sign is to be up more than one week, then the duration of the sign sha11 be
determined by the design review board,
2. The sign must be taken down twenty-four hours after the election, cause or event
for which it was erected has terminated.
(Ord. 14(1982) § 1 f(part): Ord. 13(1976) § 4: Ord. 9(1973) § 14(21),)
Private no parking signs.
Private no parking signs shall not exceed two square feet in size. They shall have a brown
background with white lettering which shalt read as fotlows:
- PWVATE PARKING
UNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES
WILL BE TOWED BY OWNER
(Ord, 36 (1983)§ 3.)
16..086 Projecting and hanging signs-Arcade.
Projecting and hanging signs, azcade shall be regulated as foliows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization fronting on an arcade within a building
j1 i
~ havmg public access. The identificahon sign or signs for a business or organization may
• include the name of the business or organization and the general nature of the business
conducted within or upon the premises. In no instance, however, shall the total portion of
the sign describing he general nature of the business exceed 40 percent of the total area of
each sign permitted for this purpose. The description of the general nature of the business
shall be incoYporated into the sign or sign identifying the name of the business and should
not exist as a separate sign;
B. Size, one square foot for each five front lineal feet of the individual business or
organizarion, with a maacimum area of five square feet. Combined maximum area for more
than one sign shall not exceed five square feet;
C. Height, minimum clearance of eight feet between the floor grade and the bottom of the
sign.
D. Number, one per business front on arcade, as determined by the administrator, with a
maximum of two signs, subj ect to rcvicw-bp-thc design review board;
E. Locarion, perpendicnlar to or hung from a projecting structural element of the exterior
wall of the business front on arcade, subject to design review board;
F. Design, subject to thcapproval-vfthe design review bowd;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Landscaping, sitbdesign review board;
I. Special provisions, or more than one business fronts an arcade, then any business or
organization requesting exterior signs shall be subject to the provisions of either the wall-
mounted or freestanding joint directory signs found in this chapter.
(Ord 14(1982) § le(part): Ord9(1973) § 14(10).) ,
~ 1:3; 16.28:998 Projecting and hanging signs-Individual business within a multi-tenant
. building.
Projecting and hanging signs, individual business within a multi-tenant building shall be
regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization which has its own exterior public entrance
within a multi-tenant building. The identification sign or signs for a business or
organization may include the name of the business or organization and the general nature
of the business conducted within or upon the premises. In no instance, however, shall the
total portion of the sign describing the general nature of the business exceed 40 per cent of
the total area of each sign permitted for this purpose. The description of the general
nature of the business shall be incorporated into the sign or sign identifying the name of
- the business and should not exist as a separate sign;
B. Size, one square foot for each five front lineal feet of the individual business or
organization having its own exterior public entrance in a multi-tenant building, with a
maximum of ten square feet, and a minimum area of three square feet wili be ailowed if a
business has insufficient frontage. The size of a multi-paneled sign shall be deternuned by
dividing the maximum size allowable by the number of panels. Combined maximum area
for more than one sign shall not exceed ten square feet;
C. Height, minimum clearance of eight feet to bottom of sign above pedestrian ways and
• 12
minimum clearance of fifteen feet to bottom of sign above vehicular ways. No part of the
sign shall elctend above twenty-five feet from existing grade; ~
D. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business abuts,
as determmed by the admmistrator wrth a maximum of two signs, subject to
design review boarr};
E. Location, perpendicular to or hung from a projecting structural element of the elcterior
wall of the individual business or organization, adjacent to the street or major pedestrian
way which the building abuts, subject to design review bomd;
F. Design, subject to design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Landscaping, ' ` ~esign review board;
1. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. A joint directory sign permitted subject to the provisions of this title;
2. A business or organization having a pmjecting or hanging sign is not excluded
from participating in a joint directory,
3. In the case where a business or organization located above or below street level
fronts directly onto an exterior balcony, deck, walkway, or stairway which is
utilized as the businesses own entrance and for unrestricted public access and use,
the allowable sign area for any sign to be locateti at that building level shall be
based upon the portion of the business frontage which abuts directly upon the
balcony, deck, walkway, or stauway, with a maximum size allowed not to exceed
five square feet. A sign of a maximum area of three square feet sha11 be allowed
for businesses having insnfficient frontage. If a business or organization located
above or below ground level proposes a sign for a location or level of the building ~
other than the level of its own unrestricted access, the sign shall be limited to a
maximum size of three square feet. The level of the access shall be defined as the
area between the floor and ceiling of that level.
(Ord. I4(1982) § 1 d-g (part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(8).)
1141: 16.20.188 Projecting and hanging signs-Joint directory signs for a multi-tenant
building.
Projecting and hanging signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tenant building shall be
regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to tist all tenants within a multi-tenant buitding and to guide the peaestrian to an
individual tenant wit}un the building;
B. Size, one square foot per tenant within the multi-tenant building, with a maximum area of
fiftcen square feet;
C. Height, minimum clearance of eight feet to bottom of sign above pedestrian ways, and
minimum clearance of fifteen feet to bottom of sign above vehicutar ways. No part of the
sign shall extend above twenty-five feet from existing grade.
D. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business abuts,
subject to design review bo:trd. If a building has two or more major
public entrances on distinct, separate pedestrian ways, proposals for additional joint-
13 •
business directories may be approved s€t~~~:1odesign review
bomd; . i0the proposal shall conform to other provisions of this section;
~ E. L o c a t i o n, p e r p endicular to ar hun g from a pro jectin g structural element of the exterior
wall adjacent to the street or major pedestrian way which the building abuts, subject to thc
design review boarc~;
F. Design, subject to thtapprovalbfthc design review baard;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
i H. Landscaping, "j";design review bomd;
1. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. All joint directory signs must be kept current,
2. Five square feet ma.y be included in a projecting or hanging joint directory sign for
the purpose of identifying the building, in lieu of any other sign for the same
purpose.
(Ord. 14(1982) § Ifin g(part): Ord. 13(1976) § 3(part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(9).)
16r2$116 Projecting and hanging signs--Single-business use.
Projecting and hanging signs, single-business use shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization being the sole business occupant within a
building. The identification sign or signs for a business or organization may include the
name of the business or organization and the general nature of the business conducted
within or upon the premises. In no instance, however, shall the total portion of the sign
describing the general nature of the business exceed 40 per cent of the total area of each '
sign peimitted for this purpose. The description of the geaeral nature of the business shall ,
~ be incorporated into the sign or sign identifying the name of the business and should not
exist as a separate sign; ,
, B. Size shall not exceed one square foot for each five front lineal feet of the building, and a
maximum area of ten square feet for a single panel sign. On a multiple-panel sign, the size
shall be calculated per panel. A maximum of three square feet will be allowed for a
business having insufficient frontage. Combined maacimum area for more than one sign
shall not exceed twenty square feet. For the purposes of this section, panel shall be
defined as two-sided piece of material within the same plane. A multiple-panel sign is
considered separate pieces of material not within the same plane, but connected;
C. Height, minimum clearance of eight feet to bottom of sign above pedestrian ways, and
minimum clearance of fifteen feet to bottom of sign above vehicular ways. No part of the
sign shall extend above twenty-five feet from existing grade on any building;
B. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business abuts,
with a maximum of two signs as deternuned by the administrator, subject to
design review boaxt;
E. Location, perpendicular to or hung from a projecting structural element of the exterior
wall adjacent to the street or major pedestrian way which the building abuts, subject to the
design review board;
F. Design, subject to design review bonrd;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
~ 14
H. Landscaping, ~~design review bearc~.
1. Special provisions shall be as follows:
l. One wall sign or freestanding sign per street or major pedestrian way permitted in ~
place af one projecting or hanging sign,
2. In the case where a business or organization located above or below street level
fronts directly onto an exterior balcony, deck, wallcway, or stauway which is
utilized as the businesses own entrauce and for unrestricted public access and use,
the allawable sign are for any sign to be located at that building level shall be based
upon the portion of the business frontage which abuts directly upon the balcony,
deck, walkway, or stairway, with a maximum size allowed not to exceed five
square feet A sign of maximum area of three square feet shall be allowed for
businesses having insufficient frontage. If a business or organization located above
or below ground level proposes a sign for a location or level of the building other
than the level of its own unrestricted access, the sign sha11 be limited to a maximum
size of three square feet. The level of the access shall be defined as the area
between the floor and ceiling of that wall. 3. An awning containing the name of the business may be substituted for one
projecting or hanging sign.
(Ord. 14(1982) § ld-g (part): Ord. 13(1976) § 3(part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(7).)
163629 Public information signs.
Public information signs shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, display board or kiosk with the intended use of locating posters, handouts and ~
cards identifying community activities, special events and personal information;
B. Size, the size of display boards or kiosks shall be at the determin~atibn i~umof-thc
design review boarct;
C. Height, subject to fthe design review bOZtrc};
D. Number, subject to the-itppreval~oftkc design review board;
E. Location, subject to tlrcapprovn}oftkc desiga review board;
F. Design, subject ta tlrcappno vai-ofthe design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Landscaping, desi~ review ~oar~•
:i ........::t~: ,
1. Special provision, thc display board and kiosk types of signs shall be constructed, erected
and maintained by the rnunicipal government or with their pernussion,
(Ord. 9(I973) § 14(20).}
16.20.130 Residential nameplate signs.
Residential nameplate signs shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a house, showing the family name and/or the home name and the -
address;
B. Size sha11 not exceed one-half square foot per single-family or duplex structure or one-half
square foot for each multi-family unit;
15 i
C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above eight feet from existing grade;
~ D. Number, limited to one sign for each dwelling unit;
I E. Location, site designation shall be attlrc determinedation 06634~t ~p;aoftlYC design review
bvarc~;
I F. Design, wall-mounted, or projecting or hanging, subject to design review
boaxct. A freestanding sign may be used for a single-family or duplex dwelling structure;
I G. Lighting, indirect;
H. Landscaping, W"bied~::t6>design review board;
I. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. Joint directory nameplate signs must be kept current as determined by the
administrator,
2. Nameplate signs in an HDMF zone shall be restricted to one wall-mounted sign
per living unit in structures having two or more living units within its confines.
Further, such structures may have one extenor wa11-mounted nameplate directory,
provided, however, that the individual nameplates of the directory are of a
standard design and size.
(Ord. 14(1982) § lg (part): Ord. 13(1976) §(part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(13).)
16.20.149 Sign Program.
Sign program shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, the intent of the sign program is to encourage a comprehensive approach to the
design, size, number, shape, color and placement of all signs pertaining to a particulaz
development or building containing a business or group of businesses. The sign program
• allows for the possibility of innovative, unique approaches to signs;
B. Size shall not exceed the maximum size requirements for each category of signs, subject to
design review boar~; -
C. Height shall not exceed the maximum height requirements for each category of signs,
subject to design review board;
D. Number, subject to thcappmoqal efthc design review board;
E. Location, subject to the-approvai ofthe design review board;
F. Design, subject to design review beard;
G. Landscaping, subject to design review boar
H. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
I. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. To qualify for the sign program, the applicant must present all elcisting, as well as
proposed, signs for approval ;
2. In the case where the applicant wishes to amend a previously granted sign
program, he may do so, but all signs in the program will be reviewed in tenns of
the proposed addition.
(Ord. 9(1973) § (19).)
-1:9. 16:20.-150 Subdivision entrance signs. Subdivision entrance signs shall be regulated as follows:
. 16
i ^
I A. Pwpose, to identify the entrance to a major subdivision, condominium complex, or group
of apartment buildings having at lease 1001inear feet of frontage along a vehicular
pedestrian way; !
B. Size, combined size of all faces of multi-sided sign may not exceed twenty square feet;
I C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above eight feet from existing grade;
I D. Number, limited to a maximum of one sign per major entry providing access to a
subdivision. Final decision as to the determination of a major entry shall be at the
I discretion of the administrator, subject to design review boarc~;
' E. Location, , ,
~ MDW, , , ,
Ef. Design, subject to design review board;
f6. Lighting, indirect ar pan-channeled;
~ Off. Landscaping shall be as follows:
1. A landscaped area of two square feet for each square foot of each side of the sign
~ and supporting structure shall be required at the base of the sign, with a minunum
area to be landscaped of twenty-four square feet,
2. All landscaped areas shall be maintained to town standards,
3. A plan showing the landscaping must be submitted by
the applicant at the time of application.
(Ord. 14(1982) § ld, g(part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(14).)
1636.69 Temporary site development signs.
Temporary site development signs shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to indicate or identify development of real properiy under construction irm .
B. Size;;;<~c~;:~~~~~;:~~e~
~~u
shall not exceed~twenty ~~{~j square feet, with a horizontal dimension no
. ~ . : : . . . . . . : . : : . . . : : . . . .
greater than ten
~ ~ ~~.7~:<~ 1~~ ~~~.~::~d
;
C. Height, the top of a frecstanding sign shall be no higher than eight feet from grade;: !fhe
D. Number, one sign per ' St~;>
, ,
, ,
E. Location shall be subject to thc-approvn}-ofthc design review board. A wall-mounted sign
shall be placed parallei to the exterior watt adjacent to the street or major pedestrian way
which the building abuts and shall be subject to tircapprero~a1-ofthe design review bowd;
F. Design, subject to theapprovaiofth design review b02rd;
C. Lighting, i
H. Special provisions shall be as foilows: ~
1. Temporary site development signs shall be removed within ten da.ys after aa
17 ~
I
~ occupancy permit is issued. The sign shall be permitted
i for a period 0010004:of one year;
2. The information permitted on::temporary site development signs
•
4*~api~C#s:ar o~~~ is limitsd
<<real estate a ents,
, to project name, g
contractors, architects, and developers. The area of the sign or-signs used for
display of the information other than the project name :~t€d~s~; is limited to 50
percent of the total area of cack sign.'~.~ t~ifo~'natttzn pert~.t~~. ~~ex
~
~~pi~ez~~ s~ci.~;
~esui~ t;~gca~~xy s~e
. .
(Ord. 14(1982) § 1 d, f, g(part): Ord. 13(1976) § 3(part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(15).)
I.I. }6.z.~. N@ Traffic-control signs for private property.
Traffic-control signs for private property sha11 be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to relieve vehicular and pedestrian traffic congestion and promote the safe and
expedient flow and parking of traffic on private property;
B. Size. All vehicular lraffic control signs shall not exceed one square foot except for multi-
puYpose signs which shall not exceed four square feet and except for private parking signs
which shall not exceed two square feet. All pedestrian traific control signs shall not ,
exceed one square foot, except multi-purpose signs, which shall not exceed four square
feet, subject to appnoroM-of design review bo~ret. I
C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above six feet from existing grade;
~ D. Nurnber, subject to approvai-of design review boarc~; ~
E. Location shall be design review bom~, with-a-letter-of approval {
from the town engineer for any sign placed adjacent to a public street or way; ;
F. Design, subject to design review boaT ; ~
G. Lighting, indirect, ~ ...j;±~~t;ti±'~;:design review board; i
H. Landscaping, WlN"design review boar~; '
1. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. May be either free-standing or wall-monnted, with same size requirements.
2. No individual sign will be approved unless it conforms to an overall sign program
for the entire site, submitted by the applicant.
3. No sign shall contain any advertising, but may identify the owner by name.
(Ord. 36(1983) 1-2: Ord. 14 (1982) § lg (part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(16).)
16.20.1$9 Wall signs-Arcade.
Wall signs, arcade shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization fronting on an arcade within a building
. having public access;
B. Size, one sign with a maximum area of three square feet;
C. Height, to the top of the signs shall be no higher than eight feet above existing grade;
D. Number, one per business front on an arcade, as determined by the administrator, subject
• 18
to rce?iew hpthe design review board;
E. Location, parallel to the exterior wall of the business front on an arcade, subject to~thc •
design review board;
F. Design, subject to design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Special provisions:
1. If more than one business fronts an arcade, then any business or organizarion
requesting exterior signs shall be subject to the provisions of either the wall-
mounted or freestanding joint directory signs found in this chapter,
2. A restaurant/bar,that does not have exterior access may also be identified on one
sign permitked for the lodge or condominium.
(Ord. 14(1982) § lg (part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(4).)
16.20.199 Wall signs Individual business within a multi-tenant building.
Wall signs, individual business within a multi-tenant building shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization which has its own exterior public entrance
within a multi-teuant building. The identification sign or signs for a business or
organization may include the name of the business or organization and the general nature
of the business conducted within or upon the premises. In no instance, however, shall the
total portion of the sign describing the general nature of the business exceed 40 per cent of
the total area of each sign permitted for this purpose. The description of the general
nature of the business shall be incorporated into the sign or sign identifying the name of
the business and should not cxist as a separate sign; ~
B. Size, one square foot for each five front lineal feet of the individual business or
. organization having its own exterior public enirance in a mulri-tenant building, with a
maximum of three square feet allowed for a business with insufficient frontage. Combined
maximum area for more than one sign shall not exceed twenty square feet;
C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above twenty-five feet from existing grade.
D. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business abuts,
as determined by the administrator, with a maximum of two signs, subject to
design review bowct.
E. Location, parallel to the exterior wall of the individual business or organization, adjacent
to the street or major pedestrian way which the building abuts, subject to
tke design review board;
F. Design, subject to design review-boasd;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
, H. Special provisions sha11 be as follows:
1. A joint directory sign permitted, subject to the provisions of this chapter;
2. A business or organization having a wall sign is not excluded from participating in
joint directory,
3. In the case where a business or organization located above or below street level
fronts directly onto an exterior balcony, deck, wallcway, or stairway which is
19 •
i
~ utilized as the businesses own entrance and for unrestricted public access and use,
I• the allowable sign area for any sign to be located at that building level shall be
based upon the portion of the business frontage which abuts directly upon the
i balcony, deck, walkway, or stauway, with a maximum size allowed not to exceed
five square feet. A sign of a maximum area of three square feet shall be allowed
~ for businesses having insufficient frontage. If a business or organization located
above or below ground level proposed a sign for a location or Ievel of the building
other than the level of its own unrestricted access, the sign shall be limited to a
maximum size of three square feet. The lEVel of the access shall be defined as the
area between the floor and ceiling of that level,
4. Space shared with common exterior public entrance by more than one business or
organization shall be treated as a single business or organization for purposes of
calculating frontage,
5. A maximum of twenty square feet will be allowed for a building identification sign.
(Ord 14(1982) § ld-g (part): Ord. 13(1976) § 3(part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(2).)
2r~ 16.20.299 Wall signs - Joint directory signs for a multi tenant building.
Wall signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tena.nt building shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to list all tenants within a multi-tenant building and to guide the pedestrian to an ~
individual tenant within the building;
B. Size, one square foot per tenant within the multi-tenant building, with a maximum area of
twenty-five square feet;
~ C. Height, no part of such signs shall extend above eight feet above existing grade;
D. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business abuts,
subject to theappioroal-ofthc design review boant. If a building has two or more major
public entrances on distinct, separate pedestrians ways, proposals for additional joint- _a
business directories may be approved si":to:design review _
boxre~;
E. Location, parallel to the exterior wall adjacent to the major pedestrian way which the .e
building abuts, subject to tlrcapprovai-oftkc design review bomd;
F. Design, subject to design review boarc~;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Special provisions shalt be as follows:
1. Any joint directory sign oriented toward pedestrians shall be subject to the
- provisions of this section,
2. All joint directory signs must be kept current,
3. Five square feet may be included in a wall-mounted joint directory sign for the
purpose of identifying the building, in lieu of any other sign for the same purpose.
(Ord. 14(1973) § lf, g(part): Ord. 13(1976) § 3(part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(3).)
2-M'"16:20.216 Wall signs Single-business use.
Wall signs, single-business use shall be regulated as follows:
~ 20
.
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization being the sole business occupant within a
building. The identification sign or signs for a business or organization may include the
name of the business or organization and the general nature of the business conducted ~
' within or upon the premises. In no instance, however, shall the total port ion of the sign
describing the general nature of the business exceed 40 percent of the total azea of each
' sign permitted for this purpose. The description of the general nature of the business shall
be incorporated into the sign or sign identifying the name of the business and should not
exist as a separate sign;
B. Size, one square foot for each five front lineal feet of the building, with a maximum area of
twenty square feet. Combined maximum area for more than one sign shall not exceed
twenty square feet;
C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above twenty-five feet from existing grade;
D. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the business abuts,
with a maximum of two per business, as determined by the administrator, subject to
design review bomd;
E. Location, para11e1 to the exterior wall adjacent to the street or major pedestrian way which
the building abuts, subject to thtapprovai of the design review bowd;
F. Design, subject to design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. One freestanding sign or projeeting sign per street or major pedestrian way
permitted in place of one wa11 sign,
2. A maximum of twenty square feet will be allowed for a building identification sign.
(Ord. 14(1982) § 1 e-g (part): Ord. 13 (1976) § 3(part): Ord. 9(1973) § 14(21).) ~
, -26.16.29.229 Window signs.
Window sigas shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify particular types of services, products or events;
B. 1. Size, any sign or signs attached to or applied to the inside swface of any exterior
window will be limited to a coverage of fif}een percent of the total window space.
Further, with the exception of gas filled, illuminated, and fiber optic window signs,
no sign or signs shall cover more than ten square feet of any window space. Gas
filled, illuminated and fiber optic window signs shall not cover more than three
square feet of any window space.
2. A window space is considerea to be the total area af any single window pane or
- series of window panes separated by mullion of twelve inches or less;
C. Height, the top of the sign shall be no more than twenty-five feet above existing grade;
D. Number, each window frontage may contain sign or signs within the prescribed sign limits
for each frontage on a street or major pedestrian way with a maximum of two signs per
frontage. Not more than one siga for each frontage sha11 be pernutted to be a gas filled,
illuminated or fiber optic window sign;
E. Location, window signs may be affixed to the interior of a glass surface or be located a
maximum of thiriy-six inches from the glass surface;
21 •
F. Design, all gas filled, illuminated, or fiber optic window signs shall be subject to revizrop-bp
~ thc design review boa
G. Lighting, indirect;
H. Landscaping, not required;
1. Special provisions sha11 be as follows:
1. A sign or signs advertising temporary events are exempt from this definition,
provided that a single sign does not exceed six square feet with a maximum area of
ten square feet aggregate for all signs denoting temporary events, provided the
sign or signs are removed at the conclusion of the temporary event and not erected
prior to ten days before the event is scheduled to take place. A temporary event is
one which does not last more than thirty consecutive days in any given calendar
year.
2. Signs denoting current or future events erected by a non-profit organization are
not subject to the time limits outlined in this section, provided that the signs are
removed within twenty-four hours after the event has ended.
3. Three square feet shall be allowed for the display of the name of a business or
organization (not to exceed 1.5 square feet), the display of hours of operation,
credit card information, and similar general information items. This area will not
be included as a part of the total allowable window coverage. ,
4. A gas filled, illuminated, or fiber optic window sign may be used to identify a
business which has no other exterior business identification sign. One square foot
of sign shall be allowed per each five lineal feet of frontage of the individual
business or organization having its own exterior public entrance in a single
~ business use or a multi-tenant building with a maximum of three square feet of sign
allowed for a business with insufficient frontage. A maacimum of ten square feet
. shall be allowed far one sign. A maximum of one sign per frontage, not to exceed
a total of two signs for the business shall be allowed.
(Ord. 5(1993) 3--6: Ord. 20(1991) § 1: Ord. 14(1982) § 1 d,g (part): Ord. 4(1975) § 2(H): _
Ord. 9(1973) § 14(11).) .
Sectie~ets:
16. . .
16. .
16. . .
. .
~ 22
.
~ I
~
16. , pennants, ~
I . • .
I 16.22.035 Cyas fffled; • •
16' ' • I
16. . •
. 16. . • I
I 16• • I
_ L• - 7•~ _ lGllA~~l V~-a LYLli~us ~1
16• • r ~•W
I I~LT~~At~l R/YIing.
16• • .
•
' 16• •
' I
16• • . I
16• • •
~::.::::::ii
ii::::i::::::::
;'.:;;'.::•:.:i:.::i . .:;>;::::y::::'::v,:;;:.>~:.: ~
. • . . h:::~ A . ~;~~.:.~11d~>;~?~>:~l~ig
~~~~sVg7:~z: • ~
A-. This zhapter sik"concems those types of permanent and temporary signs requiring a sign
application permit under the provisions of this title for property within CC3 and ABD zone
districts. This chapter further includes the pwpose of each sign type, size, height, number,
~ location, design and landscaping requirements, and special provisions for each type of sign.
:"::C'.~.:::i:j.+sii;::::':::ii%:1:i::d:'i;..`r:.`''':%::::i'::"i;:i::ii':i;`::i::::: . '
:#1~~:
: .
,
Pr'orois. .tk.
. ,
, Disony ,
. flags, , bmmets, and ,
. ,
. Politicai ,
. , ,
~ ' ' '
I 23 ~
S. ~ - ~
~ . in-folniff"tion
~
. 9
12. ~
13. , ~
14. , - ~
. wal, , - ~
16. VV-ali , . ,
S. 7keeerrt ,
19, Gas , .
. ,
. r,
C. ,
, WhTdm ,
. ~
. ~
*Ccent rq
, Gas , .
~
foliowin-
. ,
. ,
C. ,
, Window ; _ e.
. , -
. ,
, •
(Ord. , 16. Ord. . Ord.
Accent lighting.
Accent lighting shall be regulated by the following:
A. Purpose. To illuminate display windows and/or merchandise;
B. Location. Subject to thc design review board pursuant to Chapter 16.16
of the Vail Municipal Code. The lighting source of accent lighting shall not be visible
from any public way as viewed from the exterior of the business and shall be located
• 24
i
within the interior of the building. ,
C. Design. Subject to design review boarck pursuant to Ghapter 16.16 of .
the Vail Municipal Code.
(Ord. 5 (1993) § 12.)
. .
16, . Building idenhficahon signs.
, A. Purpose, to identify the name of a building;
B. Size, no greater than twenty square feet;
, C. Height, wall-mounted building identification signs:
No part of the sign shall extend above twenty-five feet from existing grade or the
plate line of a building, whichever is less;
Freestanding building identification signs:
No part of the sign shall extend above eight feet from existing grade;
D. Number, one sign;
E. Location, either wall-mounted or freestanding, subject to design
review bonr~;
F. Design, subject to design review bo7rrd;
G. Special provisions:
1. A freestanding building identification sign shall be governed by the provisions in
Section 16.22.084.
2. A wa11-mounted building identification sign shall be governed by the provisions in
Section 16.22.155. -
(Ord. 28(1989) § 3: Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part).) •
~
........r
ci ~:fdr;:ai:: ::~~.i~g::~ta~il~s~~i~
~x ~~~~fiii?;',,,:;":' ~
~
d
~es fin
. . .
~
~ :::`::::::I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
: : :
.
:..i' .
ry,:.::..:.. .f. .
'i: ' ' . . . . .
6,
: . . • .?p??~i.::': . .
~~d ;:.~p.:. . ~ . ,
.
.
F: ....:ia;aa€i
;>::>::>:::d
: ..i::.:iiiif :5.::.iii::::.(1:.ii:T':::::'::::.:.:':.~' A..4::'.:`:..:.: :i. :::.~.i' .~.:'.:':.i'::~."::.i':::::• : :::::......:.....i...;.: ;:i....:::..: : i. A:......i. : . . a fbrd~
: , . p . . .
.$t9 Display boxes.
Display boxes shall be regulated by the following:
A. Purposes, to display current menus, current real estate listings or current entertainment;
25 ,
I B. Size, no greater than three square feet;
~ C. Height, no part of the display box shall extend above six feet from existing grade;
. D. Number shall be as follows:
I 1. Permitted, one display sign;
2. Conditional, if a business has two consumer entrances on disrinct, separate
I pedestrian ways, a proposal for a second display box ~M:;may be approved. at*e
. The proposal shall conform to the other
provisions of this section.
E. Location, subject to design review bomd;-
F. Design, glass-enclosed display box, subject to thcappronal ofthc design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect;
H. Landscaping shall be as follows:
1. A landscaped area of two square feet for each square foot of each side of a
permanent freestanding display box may be required at the base of the box.
2. If landscaping is required , a plan showing the
landscaping must be submitted by the applicant at the
. . .
: .R`6`M*'_'
. : •
3. All landscaped areas shall be maintained.
1. A display box of greater than three square feet may be approved if determined to be
necessary as an accessory function to a drive-up facility, subject to appravat-ofthc design
review bo~.
(Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part).)
• 16.22.030 Flags, pennants, banners and bunting. ,
Flags, pennants, banners and bunting shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to control the proper display and maintenance of national, state or official flags
and the erection and maintenance of pennants, banners and bunting;
B. Size shall be as follows:
1. Flags, maximum size shall be si}cty square feet, the nation and the state flag shall
have proportions as prescribed by presidential declaration;
2. Pennants and banners, subject to approval by the administrator, subject to rcvicw
bq-thz design review boarc};
3. Bunting, subject to approval by the administrator, subject to design
review boarc}.
C. Height, flag poles shall be a maximum height of thirty feet, 1. Flags shall have a minimum clearance of eight feet when projecting over public
wallcways; shall have a minimum clearance of fifteen feet when projecting over
vehicular street; when displayed on flag poles, a minimum of twenty feet from top
of the pole to average grade, except for residential areas; projections over a public
way may be controlled by the design review board;
2. Pennants shall have a minimum clearance of eight feet over pedestrian ways and
fifteen feet over vehicular ways;
• 26
3. Banners shall have a minimum clearance of eight feet over pedestrian ways and
fifteen feet over vehicular ways.
D. Number, subject to the approval of the administrator, subject to design .
review boarct.
E. Location, subject to the approval of the administrator, subject to design
review boarc~.
F. Design, excepting official flags, shall be at the approval of the administrator, subject to
design review bow.
G. Lighting, indirect;
. H. Landscaping, "W:W<design review bomd;
1. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. Flags, et al, shall be maintained in a clean and undamaged condition;
2. Pennants, banners and bunting referring to community events or activities will be
allowed to e displayed for a period of no more than fourteen days. Christmas
decorations are exempt from the time period, but must be removed when their
condition has deteriorated so that they are not aesthetically pleasing. Application
must state who will be responsible for removal. In the event the pennants, banners
or bunting are not removed on the specified date, written notice by certified mail
will be given to the responsible person and the items will be removed by the town
at the owner's expense.
3. Pennants that do not refer to community events or a.ctivities and are for the
purpose of advertising may be displayed as flags subject to tin;appxovai-nfthc
design review bow d;
4. Banners, pennants, bunting or decorations of a temporary nature used for the ~
purpose of promoting community activities shall be exempted from the application
. procedure described in this title; however, the written permission of the
administrator must be obtained subject to design review bow;
5. The display of national flags shall be governed by the standard rules of
intemational protocol.
(Ord. 3(1982) § 1 (part).)
16.. Freestanding signs Single-business use.
Freestanding signs, single-business use shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization being the sole business occupant within a
building with a low-prafile planter type design sign;
B. Size, 2.5 square feet for each five front lineal feet of building with a maximum area of
twenty square feet, with a horizontal dimension no greater than ten feet. The size of a
multi-paneled sign shall be detennined by dividing the maacimum size allowable by the
number of panels. Combined maximum area for more than one sign shall not exceed
twenty square feet;
C. Height, no part of the sign shail extend above eight feet above existing grade;
D. Number, one sign;
E. Location, on the grounds of the building and adjacent to major vehicular way-which the
i
27
building abuts, subject to design review bmd;
I• F. Design, subj ect to tk design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled, provided that signs only be lighted until 10:00 p.m. or
I until closing of the business which it serves or represents, whichever is least restrictive.
H. Landscaping shall be as follows:
1, A landscaped area of two square feet for each square foot of each side of the sign
and supporting structure shall be required at the base of the sign, with a minimum
area to be landscaped of twenty four square feet;
2. A plan showing the landscaping must be submitted bY
the applicant at the time of application;
I. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. A building identification sign will not be pernutted for businesses and organizations
having a sign within this category. (Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part).)
7: 16:"~-~25 Freestanding signs Joint directory signs for multi-tenant building.
Freestanding signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tenant building shall be regulated as
follows:
A. Purpose, to list all tenants within a multi-tenant buiiding and to guide the pedestrian to an '
. individual tenant within the building;
B. Size, one square foot per tenant within the multi-tenant building, with a maximum area of
twenty-five square feet;
~ C. Height, no part of the signs shall extend above eight feet from existing grade;
D. Number, one sign on the major pedestrian way which the building abuts, subject to thc
approv at ofthc design review board. If a building has two or more major public entrances
on distinct, separate pedestrian ways, proposals for additional joint-business directories
may be approved ~~i~;~~#'~;:design review bomd.
E. Location, on the grounds of the building and adjacent to th design review bottr~;
F. Design, subject to design review boarct; G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
H. Landscaping shall be as follows:
1. A landscaped area of two square feet for each square foot of each side of the sign
shall be required at the base of the sign, with a minimum area to be landscaped of
- twenty-four square feet, in accordance with landscaping ordinance;
2. All landscaped areas shall be maintained to town standards as determined by the
administrator, subject to revicvv-bp-tl~e design review boar~;
3. A plan showing the landscaping must be submitted by
the appticant at the time of application.
1. Special provisions, five square feet may be included in the freestanding joint directory sign
for the purpose of identifying the building, in lieu of any other sign for the same purpose.
Joint directory signs must be kept current as determined by the administrator.
. 28
r
I
(Ord. 3(1982) § 1 (part).)
~
0,'16:22.935 Gas filled, illuminated and fber optic signs.
Gas filled, illuminated and fiber optic signs shall be regulated by the following unless
otherwise addressed within this title:
A. Purpose. To identify particular types of services, products or events;
B. Location. Any sign located further than thirty-six inches from the window pane and
visible from a public right of way shall be subyect design review
bom~ pursuant to Chapter 16.16 of the Vail Municipal Code;
C. Design. Subject to lrc design review board;
D. Size: All gas filled, illuminated and fiber optic signs between five square feet and ten
square feet in size and further than thirty-six inches &om the window pane wluch are
visible fiom the public way shaft $00e reviewed by the design review board pursuant to
this section.
E. Special provisions. Gas filled, illuminated and fiber optic signs wit}un the interior of the
business and not considered to be a window sign which have a total accumulative square
footage greater than ten square feet in size and which can be seen from any public way
withing the town shall be prohibited.
(Ord. 5(1993) § 9.)
16.22:948 Murals and supergraphics.
Murals and supergraphics shall be regulated as follows: •
A. Purpose, to provide for decoration applied to building walls so as to enhance the
appearance of the building's architectural character;
B. Size, subject to design review bowd;
C. Height shall not extend above the plate line of a building wall;
D. Number, subject to design review bowd;
E. Location, subject to design review beard;
F. Design, subject to thc-aprxevat-ofthc design review boaxd;
G. Lighting, indirect;
s~~i~00;4.6:&sign review board.
H. Landscaping, '
(Ord. 3(1982) § 1 (part).)
i6.22.050 Political signs.
Political signs shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, window or wall-mounted signs with the intended use of denoting a political
campaign headquarters, party affiliation, or advertising of a political figure or cause;
B. The size of the sign shall be limited to twenty square feet. Combined maximum area of
more than one sign shall be no larger than twenty square feet;
C. Height, subject to design review board;
29 ~
~
I ~
D. Number, one sign on the major pedestrian or vehicular way which the building abuts,
~ subject to ' the design review botnd;
E. Location, subject to thcapproval-ofthc design review board;
F. Design, subject to thcapprotral-of~hc design review bewd;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled, provided that signs only be lighted until 10:00 p.m. or
until closing of the headquarters which it serves or represents, whichever is least
restrictive;
H. Landscaping, not applicable;
I. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. If the sign is to be up more than one week, then the duration of the sign shall be
determined by the design review board;
2. The sign must be taken down twenty-four hours after the election, cause or event
for which it was erected has terminated.
(Ord. 3(1982) § 1 (part).)
:
q:.~
;
~o:::: ~t::e~c~~d::~x=:~.:. ~r~<~~?k::::
...............ax: > :::~~s : q.;;;.;;;: . .
.
~,.:::v`~:~i~::1~~ <W~~ s......s,:
~ . . . . . :
<:>>::::::<:::::>:::;::::«>::>:::::> > :
; :::<::.;::;:::.;::<:.
_
: . . . .
_
`::~~:'.±C~'~?:`:~'~;:~'~C?~+1~~
~ 1:~y ~96@ Projecting and hanging signs Arcade.
Projecting and hanging signs, arcade shall be regulated as follows: ,
. A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization fronting on an arcade within a building
having public access; -
B. Size, one square foot for each five front lineal feet of the individual business or _
organization, with a maximum area of ten squaze feet. Combined maximum area for more .
than one sign shall not exceed ten square feet;
C. Height, minimum clearance of eight feet between the floor grade and the bottom of the
sign, maximum height of fifteen feet above existing grade;
D. Number, one per business front on arcade, as determined by the administrator, with a
maximum of two signs, .
E. Location, perpendicular or parallel to or hung from a projecting structural element of the
- exterior wall of the business front or arcade, subject to thc-a e design review
bvm+~.
F. Design, subject to design review boar~.
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled, provided that signs only be lighted until 10:00 p.m. or
until the closing of the business which it serv es or represents, whichever is least restrictive;
design review bonrc~;
H. Landscaping, :i~;t~
%
1. Special provisions, if more than one business fronts an arcade, then any business or
organization requesting exterior signs shall be subject to the provisions of either the wall-
• 30
mounted or freestanding joint directory signs found in this chapter.
(Ord. 3(1982) § 1 (part).)
16.22.079 Projecting and hanging signs - Individual business within a multi-tenant ~
building.
Projecting and hanging signs, individual business within a multi-tenant building shall be
~ regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organizarion which has its own exterior public entrance
within a multi-tenant building;
B. Size, 2.5 square feet for each five front lineal feet of the individual business or
organization having its own exterior public entrance in a multi-tenant building, with a
I maximum of twenty square feet, and a minimum area of five square feet will be allowed if
a business has insufficient frontage. The size of a multi-paneled sign shall be deternuned
! by dividing the maximum size allowable by the number of panels. Combined maximum are
for more tha.n one sign shall not exceed twenty square feet;
C. Height, minimum clearance of eight feet to bottom of sign above pedestrian ways and
minimum clearance of fifteen feet ta bottom of sign above vehicular ways. No part of the
sign shall extend above fifteen feet from existing gade;
D. Number, one sign;
E. Location, perpendicular or parallel to or hung from a projecting structural element of the
exterior wall of the individual business or organization, adjacent to the North Frontage
Road, subject to flicapprrnrn}-of-lhc design review bom~;
F. Design, subject to design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled, provided that signs only be lighted until 10:00 p.m. or ~
until the closing of the business which it serves or represents, whichever is the least
resirictive;
H. Landscaping, s~i esiSn review board; '
I. Special provisions sha11 be as follows:
1. A joint directory sign permitted subject to the provisions of this title;
2. A business ar organization having a projecting or hanging sign is not excluded
from participating in a joint directory;
3. An individual business with no calculable frontage along the North Frontage Road
or with a basement or second floar entrance may have one sign with a maximum
area of five square feet in a location approved by the design review board
designated in a specific sign pmgram for the building in which the business or
- organization is located. This provision does not apply to businesses or
organizations fronting on an arcade.
(Ord.3(1982) § 1(part).)
16.22:886 Projecting and hanging signs Joint directory signs for a multi-tenant
building.
Projecting and hanging signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tenant building shall be
31 •
.
.
regulated as follows:
I• A. Pwpose, to list all tenants within a multi-tenant building and to guide the pedestrian to an
individual tenant within the building;
~ B. Size, one square foot per tenant within the multi-tenant building, with a maximum area of
fifteen square feet;
C. Height, minimum clearance of eight feet to bottom of sign above pedestrian ways, and
, minimum clearance of fifteen feet to bottom of sign above vehicular ways. No part of the
sign shall extend above fifteen feet from existing grade;
D. Number, one sign on the major pedestrian way which the building abuts, subject to the
design review-bexrd. If a building has two or more major public entrances
on distinct, separate pedestrian ways, proposals for additional joint-business directories
may be approved review board, the proposal shall
conform to the other provisions of this section;
E. Location, perpendicular or parallel to or hung from a projecting structural element of the
exterior wall adjacent to the North Frontage Road, subject t design
review boxnt;
F. Design, subject to thz-appirn?al-oftke design review bowd;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled, provided that signs only be lighteci until 10:00 p.m. or
until the closing of the business which it serves or represents, whichever is least restrictive;
H. Landscaping, esign review bowd;
1. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. All joint directory signs must be kept current;
2. Five square feet may be included in a projecting or hanging joint directory sign for _
~ the purpose of identifying the building, in lieu of any other sign for the same
purpose.
(Ord. 3(1982) § 1 (part).)
1.5; 16.22.999 Public information signs.
Public information signs shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, display board or kiosk with the intended use of locating posters, handouts and
cards identifying community activities, special events and persona.l information.
B. Size, the size of display boards or kiosks shall be the determinedatioa ~4W"::ofthz
design review boaTd.
C. Height, subject to design review boaid;
D. Number, subject to thc-approvai-ofthz design review bmarc};
E. Location, subject to Iie design review boar
F. Design, subject to design review bom;
G. Lighting, indireet or pan-channeled;
H. Landscaping, s~1;:to::design review boarc~.
(Ord. 3(1982) § 1 (part).)
1W.-A6.22.199 Sign program.
• 32
r
' Sign program shall be regulated as follows:
' A. Purpose, the intent of the sign program is to encourage a comprehensive appmach to the
design, size, number, shape, color and placement of all signs pertaining to a particular ~
development or building containing a business or group of businesses. The sign program
allows for the possibility of innovative, unique approaches to signs;
B. Size sha.ll not exceed the maximum size requirements for each category of signs, subject to
design review boax~;
C. Height shall not exceed the maximum height requirements for each category of signs,
subject to design review bow; D. Number, subject to tlre design review bow;
E. Location, subject to design review bowd;
F. Design, subject to thz design review bow ; G. Landscaping, subject to thcappirn?al-bfthc design review board;
H. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled;
1. Special provisions sha11 be as follows:
1. At the time that any sign on a building located within Commercial Core IIl or
Arterial Business District is removed, changed, or altered in any way, a sign
program for that particular building is encouraged to be submittedtothcdesiga
revie n board prior to the erection of any new sign on the building.
a. A sign may be removed and re-erected for the purposes of normal
maintenance of the sign.
2. As a part of the overall sign program for a building the total sign allowance for a
building may be apportioned along the building frontage in any manner the
applicant chooses, provided that the size of any one sign shall not exceed the ~
maximum size requirements for each category of signs. The measurement for the
, determination of lineal frontage for sign allowance purposes shall be made at the '
structural foundation or building line at finish grade. Dnly the building front which
most closely parallels the front lot line shall be included.
3. Businesses located on the first floor and having exterior frontage within a building
may be allowed one sign with a maximum area of three square feet for the pwpose
of identifying the business, entrance, location and design subject to~dic approro7rli of
thc design review boant.
4. In the case where a building located within CC3 or ABD has a business frontage
which is not adjacent to the North or 5outh Frontage Roads, but has calculable
frontage which is tocated along apedestrian way at the end of a building adjacent
- to the interior of CC3 or ABD and has direct access or disglay area along that
pedestrian way, the provisions applicable shall be the same as for a business
fronting on an arcade, subject to tiica design review boarct.
a. Under this provision a business or arganization which fronts on both the
azcade and the end of the building may have a maximum of two signs with
a maximum size of twenty square feet (based upon frontage) combined,
allocated in any rnanner tiie applicant chooses, subject
thc design review bo.
33 •
b. This provision is not applicable to businesses with frontage adjacent to
~ exterior boundaries of CC3 or ABD other than the North and South
Frontage Roads..
5. Any sign erected which is part of the sign program must receive
design review-board.
I 6. In the case where the applicant wishes to amend a previously granted sign
I program, he may do so, but all signs in the program will be reviewed in terms of
the proposed addition.
(Ord. 28(1989) 4-6: Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part).)
16.22;119 Temporary site development signs.
Temporary site development signs shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to indicate or identify a developrnent of real property under construction in CC3
or ABD;
B. Size shall not exceed twenty square feet, with a horizontal dimension no greater than ten
feet.
fcct;
C. Height, the top of a freestanding sign or wall sign shall be no higher than eight feet from
existing grade; -
D. Number, one sign;
E. Location shall be subject to thz-appinroai-ofthc design review boar~. A wa11-mounted sign ~
shall be placed parallel to the exterior waZl adjacent to the street or major pedestrian way -
• which the building abuts and shall be subject to design review board;
F. Design, subject to design review bearc~;
G. Lighting, ~ - ,
H. Special provisions shall be as follows: J
1. Temporary site development signs shall be removed within ten days after an _
; ,
~g~;:occupancy im.-I-Ifi~`i~a pcnrrit is issued. The sign shalt be permitted for a
period iI.**..*'~'..'.'..,.,;1"0;one year.
2. The information permitted on temporary site development signs is limited to
~
roJ'ect name :V<~: :'::;o~> ea1 estate a ent~
P ~ F : :~P'3~.::::. ..~Prnne r g
contractors, architects;;::~~::~!~.::::
~
~
_
- : : .
of:_
. (Ord. 28(1989) § 7: Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part).)
10; 16:2.120 Traffic control signs for private property.
Traffic control signs for CC3 or ABD shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to relieve vehicular and pedestrian traffic congestion and promote the safe and
expedient flow and parking af traffic on private property;
• 34
B. Size, all vehicular traffic control signs shall not exceed one square foot, except multi-
purpose signs, which shall not exceed four square feet. All pedestrian traffic control signs ~
shall not exceed one sQuare foot, except multi-purpose signs, which shall not exceed four
square feet, subject to design review boar~.
C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above six feet from existing grade;
! D. Number, subject to tkcapriroval.-~ofthe design review boar
~ E. Location shall be j*@0#J0:; design review bo, with-aiclterbf approval
from the town engineer for any sign placed adjacent to a public street or way;
I F. Design, subject to design review board;
G.
G. Lighting, indirect, ~;design review boar~;
H. Landscaping, "W*siesign review baard;
~ I. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. May be either free-standing or wall-mounted, with same size requirements;
' 2. No individual sign will be approved unless it conforms to an overall sign program
for the entire building, submitted by the applicant;
3. No sign shall contain any advertising, but ma.y identify the owner by name;
4. If a"no parlcing" sign (as fuinished by the town) is used, there may no other sign
for the same purpose.
(Ord. 28(1989) § 8: Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part).)
1.1"A6.22:138 Wall signs Arcade.
Wall signs, arcade shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business organization frottting on an arcade within a building or ~
between buildings having public access;
B. Size, one square foot for each five front lineal feet of the individual business or
organizatian with a maximum area of ten square feet;
C. Height, the top of the signs shall be no higher than eight feet above exrist2ng grade;
D. Number, one per business front on an arcade, as determined by the administrator, subject
to design review board;
E. Location, paxatlel to the exterior wall of the business frant on an arcade, subject to the
design review boar~;
F. Design, subject to design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeted provided that signs only be tighted until 10:00 p,m. or
until the closing of the business which is serves or represents, whichever is the least
- restrictive;. (Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part),) ,
211~; 16-22:149 Wall signs Individusl business within a multi-tenant building.
Wall signs, individual business within a multi-tenant building shail be regulated as foltows:
A. Purpose, to ideatify a business or organization which has its own exterior public entrance
within a multi-tenant building;
35 •
Y
I
I B. Size, 2.5 square feet for each five front lineal feet of the individual business or
organization having its own exterior public entrance in a multi-tenant building, with a
maximum of five square feet allowed for a business with insufficient frontage. Maximum
area shall not exceed twenty square feet;
C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above twenty-five feet from existing grad or the
plate line of the building, whichever is more restrictive;
D. Number, one sign;
E. Locarion, parallel to the exterior wall of the individual business or organization, adjacent
to the North or South Frontage Roads, subject to design review board;
' F. Design, subject to thzapproval-ofthc design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled provided that signs only be lighted until 10:00 p.m. or
until the closing of the business which it serves or represents, whichever is least restrictive;
H. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. A joint directory sign permitted, subject to the provisions of this chapter;
2. A business or organization have a wall sign is not excluded from participating in a
joint directory;
3. An individual business with no calculable frontage along the North or South
Frontage Roads, or with a basement or second floor entrance, may have one sign
with a maximum area of five square feet in a location approved by the design -
review board or designated in a specific sign program for the building in which the
business or organization is located;
4. Space shared with common exterior public entrance by more than one business or
organiaation shall be treated as a single business or organization for the purposes
• of calculating frontage.
(Ord. 28(1989) 9, 10: Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part).)
2-1: 16.22.159 Wall signs - Joint directory signs for a multi-tenant building.
Wall signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tenant building shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to list all tenants within a multi-tenant building and to guide the pedestrian to an
individual tenant within the building;
B. Size, one square foot per tenant within the multi-tenant building, with a maximum area of
twenty-five square feet;
C. Height, no part of such signs shall extend above eight feet above existing grade;
D. Number, one sign;
E. Location, parallel to the exterior wall adjacent to the North or South Frontage Roads
subject to design review-bomd;
F. Design, subject to the design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled provided that signs only be lighted until 10:00 p.rn. or
until the closing of the business which it serves or represents, whichever is least restrictive;
H. Special provisions sha11 be as follows:
1. Any joint directory sign oriented toward pedestrians sha11 be subject to the
provisions of this section;
~ 36
Y
I r
2. Alljomt directory signs must be kept current;
3. Five square feet may be included in a wall-mounted joint directory sign for the
, purpose of identifying the building, in lieu of any other sign for the same purpose. ~
(Ord: 28(1989) § 2: Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part).)
16r.22.155 Wall signs Single-business use.
. Wall signs, single-business use shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify a business or organization being the sole business occupant within a
building;
B. Size, 2.5 square feet for each five front lineal feet of the building, with a maximum area of
twenty square feet. Combined maximum area for more than one sign shall not exceed
twenty square feet;
C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above twenty-five feet from existing grade or the
plate line of the building, whichever is more restrictive;
D. Number, one sign;
E. Location, parallel to the exterior wall adjacent to the street which the building abuts,
subject to design review boartt;
F. Design, subject to design review bowd;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled provided tha.t signs only be lighted until 10:00 p.m. or
until the closing of the business which it serves or represents, whichever is least restrictive.
H. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. A building identification sign will not be permitted for businesses and organizations
having a sign within this category.
(Ord. 3(1982) § 1 (part).) •
2`116.22.160 Window signs.
Window signs shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to identify particular types of services, products or events;
B. 1. 5ize, any sign or signs attached to or applied to the inside surface of any exterior
window will be limited to a coverage of fifteen percent of the total window space.
Further, with the exceprion of gas filled, illuminated, and fiber optic window signs,
no sign or signs shall cover more than ten square feet of any windvw space. Gas
filled, illuminated and fiber optic window signs shall not cover more than three - square feet of any window space;
2. A window space is considered to be the total area of any single window pane or
series of window panes separated by rnullions of twelve inches ar less;
C. Height, the top of the sign shall be no more than twenty-five feet above existing grade;
D. Number, each window frontage may contain sign or signs within the prescribed sign limits
for each frontage on a street or major pedeslrian way with a maximum of two signs per
frontage. Not more than one sign for each frontage shall be permitted to be a gas filled,
illuminated or fiber optic window sign.
37 ~
y
I
I t
I E. Location, window signs must be affixed to a glass surface or a maximum of six inches
from the glass surface;
F. Design, a11 gas filled, illuminated, or fiber optic window signs sha11 be subject tcrrevizron'by
thc design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect or pan-channeled pravided that signs only be lighted until 10:00 p.m. or
unh '1 the closing of the business which it serves or rePresents, whichever is least restrictive.
~
i H. Landscaping, not required;
1. Special provisions shall be as follows:
' 1. In the event that a business or organization chooses to locate an identification sign
on a window in lieu of a projecting or hanging sign, or a wall sign, they may do so,
subject to the requirements of the category under which the business falls, subject
ta design review board.
2. A gas filled, illuminated, or fiber optic window sign may be used to identify a
business which has no other exterior business identification sign. Two and five-
tenths square feet of sign shall be allowed per each five lineal feet of frontage of
the individual business or organization having its own extenior enbrance in a single
business use or a multi-tenant building, with a maximum of five square feet of sign
allowed for businesses with insufficient frontage. A maxirnum of ten square feet
shall be allowed for one (1) sign. A maximum of one sign per frontage, not to
exceed a total of two signs for the business shall be allowed. .
(Ord. 5(1993) 3-- 5, 7: Ord. 3(1982) § 1(part).) ,
• SIGN.REV
~ 38
<
APPROYEDJ`~
~ PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
I ~ May 20, 1996
Minutes
MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT:
Greg Moffet Mike Mollica
Greg Amsden Jim Curnutte
Henry Pratt George Ruther
Gene Uselton Dominic Mauriello
Galen Aasland Judy Rodriguez
Diane Golden
Public Hearina 2:00 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Greg Moffet at 2:00p.m.
1. A request to renew the 1995 approval of a conditional use permit for a three week period,
to allow for an outdoor dining deck located at Garton's Saloon/Lot P, Block 51), Vail
Village 1 st Filing. (The annual review of the conditional use permit is currently scheduled
for June 10, 1996).
Applicant: Dave Garton
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
• Dominic Mauriello gave an overview of the staff memo.
Greg Moffet asked if the applicant had anything to add.
Dave Garton thanked the staff and said that he appreciated being allowed to open for the next 3
weeks.
Diane Golden asked why it takes so long to clean up the site at the end of the season?
Dave Garton indicated that the time period allowed for clean-up could be reduced.
Greg Moffet asked for any public comment. There was none.
Gene Uselton made a motion for approval subject to the conditions in the staff memo.
Greg Amsden secnnded the motion.
The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0.
Planning and Environmental Commission
• Minutes
May 20, 1996 1
r
2. A request to modify a condition of approval for a conditional use permit for volleyball
courts to be located by the soccer field, located at 620 Vail Valley DrivelTract A, Block 2, ~
Vail Village 7th filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District ~
~ Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther gave an overview of the request. The applicant would like to go back to the metal
posts as originally proposed. The VRD requests that the requirement of wood posts be amended ~
to metal.
Greg Moffet asked for any applicant or public input. There was none.
Galen Aasland made a motion to approve the request.
' The motion was seconded by Henry Pratt. ~
It passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0.
Greg Moffet introduced Russ Forrest representing the Open Space Committee.
Russ Forrest explained that this committee designates open space and asked if a member of the
PEC would like to serve on this comrnittee.
Greg Moffet asked if the PEC would like a secret ballot.
Gene Uselton nominated Henry Pratt. ' •
Galen Aasland seconded the nomination.
It passed unanimously.
3. A request for a Conditional Use Permit to use a tent at the Lionshead Ski School for
Camp Vail, located at 520 Lionshead Mall/ Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st filing
Applicant: Vail Recreation District
Planner: Jim Curnutte
Jim Curnutte gave an overview of the request and stated that adjacent property owners had been
natified and he had rece+ved no complaints. He stated that whether the tent is there or nat, the
children will still use the play area next to the tent. He said that staff was recommending
approval with the conditions that a stairway, with a railing, be added to the south doorway, that
skirting be added to the bottom of the tent, and that no signs be added to the tent or property
until they are reviewed and approved by the Town.
Greg Moffet asked for applicant or public comment. There was none.
Galen Aasland had concerns with a Building Code issue if the tent becomes a permanent
structure.
I Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes ~
May 20, 1996 2
I
I y.
Greg Amsden asked about the wood storage structure in the viciniry.
• Susan Hotter, of the VRD, said that VA is using the shed for storage.
Greg Amsden said that revegetation is needed east of the tent.
I Susan Hotter said that during Vail Clean-Up Day, she had taken extra time to clean up the area.
~ Mike Mollica asked if the PEC wants a split-rail fence and landscaping on the east side of the
tent.
Greg Amsden asked staff for direction on what kind of revegetation?
Jim Curnutte said either seed or sod:
Greg Amsden stated that seeding would not work because the grass would not sprout by June
10th.
Henry Pratt agreed with Greg Amsden.
Diane Golden suggested an erosion control tarp.
Jim Curnutte said a silt fence is supposed to be functioning. i
Mike Mollica suggested considering erosion control matting on top until it is established. . I
• Gene Uselton said he would like childproof construction fences around the play area. ~
Jim Curnutte suggested adding a condition, as it relates to Galen's concern regarding !
: indemnifying the Town. The 180 day allowance is over and VA should indemnify the Town for ,
using a temporary structure for longer than it was allowed.
Greg Amsden made a motion to approve the request with the conditions in the staff memo and ,
additional conditions as follows:
1. That childproof construction fencing be installed.
2. That the applicant revegetate the east side of the tent between the tent and the creek.
3. That the erosion control fence be made to function properly.
4. That the applicant indemnify the Town of Vail for the continued use of the tent.
Gene Uselton asked about the "Children Playing" signs mentioned in the memo.
Jim Curnutte said the signage was a request by the VRD.
The motion was seconded by Gene Uselton.
Henry Pratt said the "Children Playing" sign shouldn't be required.
Greg Amsden amended the motion.
Planning and Environmental Commission
• Minutes
May 20, 1996 3
i
I
It was seconded by Gene Uselton.
The motion passed unanimously by a vote af 6-0. •
4. A request for a Conditional Use Permit in the CCII Zone District ta allow for a miniature
golf course to be located at 600 Lionshead Mall/Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing.
' Applicant: Charlie Alexander
Planner: Jim Curnutte
Jim Curnutte gave an overview, stating that Charlie Alexander wants to extend his previous
appsoval to operate the miniature golf course in the existing location, until VA breaks ground on
the gondola, currently scheduled for July 8, 1996. The move to the new location near the
gondola stairs witl happen when VA starts construction. He stated that the applicant wilf come
back in the fall and ask for a new conditional use permit for future operations once the new
gondola has been constructed. Jim stated that the operation has never received any complaints
and is an improvement to the Lionshead area. Staff is recommending approval with no
conditions.
Greg Moffet asked for any public comment.
Charlie Alexander, the applicant, said he did pursue other locations and opportunities. He
appreciated the chance to keep the operation alive in Lionshead.
Diane Golden said she was glad it was located in Lionshead.
Greg Amsden noted that in the event VA does not start construction on July 8th, the applicant be •
allowed to stay in that location, until Va kicks him out.
s Galen Aasland made a motion for approval in, accordance with the staff memo and with the
addition that the applicanYs use of the existing course not be tied to a specific date, but be
allowed to use the existing course until VA requires him to move to the new site.
The motion was seconded by Henry Pratt.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0.
5. A request for a parking variance and a variance to locate GRFA within the front setback,
to allow for the construction of a new primary/secondary res+dence, located at 2338
Garmish Drive/Lot 12, Block G, Vail Das Schone #2
Applicant: Dave Hilb and Greg Cummings
~ Planner: Jim Curnutte
' Jim Curnutte said that due to the steepness of the lot (50%+), the applicant had a right to put the
~ garages in the front setback. However, the site coverage allowance is more restrictive because
steep lots are more prone to visual scars. Jim pointed out that the applicants had applied for a
~ stite caverage variance prev9ously, but were abfe to redesign the bui{ding to camply. They are
leaving about 500 sq. ft of GRFA unused. If the PEC doesn't want to approve the GRFA in the
Planning aad Envuonmental Commission
Minutes •
May 20, 1996 4
I
.
i •
fr nt etback, y ou won y difference ~t see an in the building. Jim stated there are no visual
o s
~ impacts associated with the requested variances. Staff is comfortable with the request as
submitted. The Engineering Department wants 4' of paving added on either side of the driveway.
Jim asked the engineers to be here, but they are not present. He feels the intent is to park one
~ more car off of the road. Staff is not pushing the idea of one more space. He feels it should be
brought to the PEC's attention for discussion.
Greg Moffet asked the applicant if he had anything to add.
Dave Hilb said that this was a better design than the one they looked at two meetings ago.
Greg Moffet asked for any public comment. There was none.
Gene Uselton recommended landscaping instead of the additional 4' of asphalt on each side of
the driveway, as recommended by the Town Engineer.
' Diane Goiden agreed.
Henry Pratt had no problem with the parking variance request. He did not want an additional 4'
of pavement in front of the garage. Since the GRFA is in the front setback, we need to know
what sets this request apart. By making the garage a bridge with nothing underneath it, the
applicant has taken his allowable GRFA and filled in under the bridge. For that reason Henry
feels it is not a grant of special privilege. This is different from previous applications, as it is not ;
affecting the bulk and mass. Therefore, Henry is in favor of the GRFA in the front setback
variance. ,
• Greg Amsden is not in favor of the additional 4' of asphalt. He feels that approval of the variance
will cause no adverse effect on neighboring properties and agrees that it is a much better design.
~ Galen Aasland agrees with Henry's comments. He is in support of the GRFA in the front setback. However, should a second story above the garage be requested later on, he would not
look favorably on such a request. If the applicant builds a garage 24' from the front of the garage
to the street and sells the house, Galen feels that the new owner of the property should not hold
the Town responsible for any damage to cars resulting from the approval to park in front of the
garage (snow plows, etc.).
Greg Moffet said Galen brought up the issue of parking in the right-of-way As a condition he
suggested having the applicant indemnify the Town from any damage by the Town in exchange
for parking in the right-of-way. Greg is in agreement with the rest of the commission. To further
distinguish this from the Orrison request he clarified that this was a 2-story structure in the front
setback and that there is not a reasonable alternative on the site to locate the fifth required
parking space without tremendous site disturbance. He agreed with Greg Amsden that the
public had not come forth with any public comments regarding it as a problem.
Greg Amsden made a motion to approve the variances per the recommendations in the staff
memo and that additional asphalt and widening by 4' on the side of the driveway not be pursued.
Also, that the applicant indemnify the Town for any damage to cars parked so close to the road.
~ . Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
May 20, 1996 5
Mike Mollica said we need to talk to Tom Moorhead, the Town Attorney, regarding the exact '
wording of the indemnification. •
Henry Pratt said that the intent was to have this waiver apply to subsequent property owners, as
welt as the existing one. Henry Pratt asked that Greg Amsden go through the findings for the
record.
Greg Amsden stated the findings have been met as specified in the staff memo.
The motion was seconded by Henry Pratt. ~
It passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0.
6. A request for an amendment to the previously approved site development ptan for the
Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision, located at 2772-2892 Kinnickinnick Road/Innsbruck
Meadows.
' Applicant: Innsbruck Meadows Development, represented by Bob Borne
Planner: George Ruther
Greg Amstlen abstained from this discussion and vote.
George Ruther gave an overview of the request and stated that just the east-half of Innsbruck
Meadows is being affected. The request is to move the approved building footprints more than
10', to reiocate two EHU's within the subdivision and to realign the bike path. These changes are
necessitated, in part, by the inclusion of garages for the EHU. The total allowable GRFA is not
changing. Staff's only concern with the request is that Building #11 is too parallel with the south •
property line. Staff is recommending that the PEC look at rotating Building #11, to eliminate the
parallel alignment. George stated that the adjacent property owners have been notified. To
date, staff has received only one telephone call, it was regarding the west hatf, not the east half
of the project.
Bob Borne thanked George for his great job of explaining the request. Bob stated that he put in
garages to get cars off the streets. Bob stated there is a cause and effect when trying to add
garages since the site plan is so tight. A change in the bikepath from concrete to asphalt was
requested to match the blacktop driveways. As far as the conditions, Bob stated that pivoting
Building #11 will take it further .away from the Camelot Townhomes, which is a plus. Building #11
can only be pivoted until the roof overhang meets the property line. Bob was concerned that the
removal of the ability to move buildings up to 10', with staff approval is too stringent.
George Ruther said candition No. 5 was put in because of the cause and effect or domino effect
moving buildings causes.
Greg Moffet asked George if it was more time consuming for staff if the building was shifted 1'?
If it were a minimum of 5', would it save time for you?
i George Ruther said this plan conforms with all the conditions of approval and he did not see the
need to move the buildings 1'or 2', etc.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes •
May 20, 1996 6
Galen Aasland asked if the building corners were tied to lot corners.
I~ George Ruther stated yes
Bob Borne stated be doesn't want to come back to the PEC for only 1'. If there's a mistake, iYs
within our property. The driveway grades will remain the same. He wants some leeway and to
know that they are not in violation if there's a 6" error.
Galen Aasland supports staff. He does feel the applicant should be given some leeway, just not
near the setbacks. He supports rotating Building #11.
Henry Pratt agrees with what Bob Borne wants to do. The asphalt bike path is better than
concrete. He encourages the DRB to take a look at adding sorne trees along the bike path and
south of Building #13. Lot 10 should go back to where it was. The proximately to Camelot is
closer. He agrees with rotating Building #11 to make a ragged line, perhaps up to 2' with staff
approval. He agrees with Galen's comments.
Diane Golden agrees with Henry.
Gene Uselton had no comment.
Greg Moffet agrees with Henry.
Henry Pratt made a motion for approval of the request in accordance with the staff memo. He
added that condition No. 5 be amended to include staff approval for up to 2' changes in building :
footprint locations and the other 5 conditions remain the same, with the addition of condition No.
• 7 to add landscaping and that condition No. 8 be added that Building #11 be rotated in
accordance with the PEC's discussions and encouraging that the applicant look at rotating
Building #10 as well.
Greg Moffet asked that condition No. 8 be completed before condition No. 5 goes into effect. y
The motion was seconded by Galen Aasland.
Mike Mollica asked for clarification on the rotation of Building #11 .
Henry Pratt said it should be rotated as much as possible without compromising the driveway
grades. Galen's intent was to place it back to where it was before.
Galen Aasland asked if the garage could be lowered.
Bob Borne said the slab could be raised or lowered. He added that he will rotate the buildings as
much as possible while avoiding encroachment into setbacks.
Henry Pratt suggested rotating it somewhere between where it is and where it was.
Galen Aasland thought it should be closer to its original position.
The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 5-0-1.
Planning and Environniental Commission
• Minutes
May 20, 1996 7
Greg Moffet stated, for the record, that Jim Curnutte will be sorely missed.
7. A request for a Sign Code Amendment to allow for an amendment and reorganization of ~
Title 16, Signs, Chapters 16.20 (Sign Categories) and 16.22 (Sign Categories for the CC3
and ABD Zone Districts).
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
Dominic Mauriello gave an overview of the memo. He explained that there was only one
substantive change to the temporary development sign. He did present the board with a letter
from Bill Anderson who thinks a contact person and phone number should be on all temporary
development signs. He feels we should limit the size of signs and not deal with the verbiage.
' Galen Aasland said that on page 18, the information that is required is public information and
should be allowed on the sign and the information should be consistent on all temporary site
development signs.
- Greg Amsden agrees with Galen. It seems a mixed message.
Henry Pratt has similar feelings. It is not fair that multi-family zones can have development signs
and not single-family zones. It becomes an enforcement issue that the Town cannot enforce.
Larger projects should have a Real Estate Agent listed. He was not in favor of a double
standard. It should be allowed for both single-family or two-family with minimal information on
the sign.
Diane Golden had no comment. •
Gene Uselton asked Dominic if amending the sign code was an ongoing process?
Dominic Mauriello said, yes, but that this was the first step in the process of reworking the entire
Design Review and sign code requirements.
Gene Uselton asked if it was premature to make changes to the code now.
Dominic Mauriello said in the meantime we have to work with what we have. The idea with this
revision is to make the sign code understandabte and user-friendly.
Mike Mollica said temporary development signs are very inconsistent.
Gene Uselton agreed with Henry's comments.
Greg Moffet thought the name, address and permit should be displayed. It is not fair that a single
family can't put a sign in their yard. Lets level the playing field. He stated that he would like to
strike the reference to real estate agents, contractors, architects and developers from the
commercial and multi-family signs.
Mike Mollica said in the recent past, the Town has allowed renderings on temporary development
signs in commercial areas. Is it your intention to do away with those?
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes •
May 20,1996 8
.
.
Greg Amsden said it is a good idea to leave pictures on the signs.
~ Greg Moffet had no problem with a visual picture on the signs. He is of the opinion that real
estate is such big business and should not be on signs, since you are able to pick up free
newspapers with real estate ads.
Dominic Mauriello confirmed that a display of permits and a rendering of a project could be on
signs and we should amend the paragraph to clearly state that they are allowed.
Henry Pratt asked if this is only for multi-family?
Mike Mollica said we should be consistent in the way that anyone uses their sign.
Greg Moffet asked if this is being recommended to go to Council?
Dominic Mauriello stated that it was.
Henry Pratt made a motion as presented by the staff memo with a minor change on page 18, at
the top of paragraph 2 allowing renderings on temporary signs with the rest of the paragraph left
intact.
Greg Amsden seconded the motion.
Dominic reiterated that the addition of allowing renderings was the only change.
The motion passed by a vote of 4-2, with Greg Moffet and Greg Amsden opposed.
• 8. A request for an interior residential addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at '
100 East Meadow DriveNillage Inn Plaza Phase III, Unit 111/Lot O, Block 5D; Vail Village
. 1 st Filing. I
Applicant: Tom Thornburg ~
Planner: Lauren Waterton
STAFF APPROVED
9. A request for a minor subdivision to change the property line between Lots 2& 7, located
at 2446 and 2450 Chamonix Lane/Lot 2, a resubdivision of Lots 8, 9 and 10, Block B, Vail
Das Schone Filing #1 and Lot 7, Block B, a resubdivision of Vail Das Schone, Filing #1.
_ Applicant: Karen Scheidigger
Planner: Jim Curnutte •
TABLED TO JUNE 24,1996
Greg Amsden made a motion to table item no.9.
Henry Pratt seconded the motion.
Planning and Environmental Commission
• Minutes
May 20, 1996 9
f
, S .
l
The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0. .
11. Information Update ~
Greg Moffet asked Mike Mollica for the information update.
Mike Mollica stated that there will be two sets of minutes to be approved at the next meeting due
to the back to back PEC meetings resulting from the holiday weekend.
Mike Mollica said the gondola appeal was going before the Council tomorrow.
Mike Motlica stated that the Council wiii interview three applicants for the one PEC opening and
make the appointment tomorrow night.
Mike Mollica said there is a 2nd reading of the Appeals Ordinance on the Council agenda.
Galen Aasland had changes to the April 22, 1996 minutes on page 8 regarding his comments
about the gondola.
Greg Amsden made a motion to adjourn the meeting.
The motion was seconded by Henry Pratt.
The meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m.
i
•
d j
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes •
May 20, 1996 10