Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-0722 PECTHIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail 16 will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on July 22, 1996, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request for an exterior addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 781 Potato Patch/Lot 21, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Sissel and Richard Pomboy Planner: Dominic Mauriello A request for a landscape variance to allow for a building addition and additional surface parking, located at 2131 N. Frontage Road/ Lot 3, Vail Das Schone 3rd Filing. Applicant: Safeway, Inc., represented by Dennis Wyatt Planner: Dominic Mauriello A request for an interior addition in the existing basement utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 1645 Golf Terrace, Vail Golfcourse Townhomes, Unit 432. Applicant: Jeff Lutz Planner: Lauren Waterton A request for a worksession to discuss a variance to allow detached garages in the front setback, located at 2853 and 2833 Kinnickinnick Road/Lots 7 & 8, Block 4, Vail Intermountain/Lodges at Timber Creek. Applicant: Jim Marx Planner: Dominic Mauriello Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. Community Development Department Published July 5, 1996 in the Vail Trail. Agenda last revised 7/l 9/961 ] am PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Monday, July 22, 1996 AGENDA Proiect Orientation / Lunch - Communitv Development Department 12:30 pm Site Visits 1:00 pm 1. Pomboy - 781 Potato Patch 2. Lodges at Timber Creek - 2833 Kinnickinnick Road Driver: Dominic Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a worksession to discuss a variance to allow detached garages in the front setback, located at 2853 and 2833 Kinnickinnick Road/Lots 7 & 8, Block 4, Vail Intermountain/Lodges at Timber Creek. Applicant: Jim Marx ,Planner: Dominic Mauriello . 2. A request for an exterior addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 781 Potato Patch/Lot 21, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Sissel and Richard Pomboy Planner: Dominic Mauriello 3. A request for an interior remodel to add a bedroom and bathroom of approximately 250 sq. ft., in the existing basement utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 1645 Golf Terrace, Vail Golfcourse Townhomes, Unit 432. Applicant: Jeff Lutz Planner: Lauren Waterton STAFF APPROVED 4. A request for a landscape variance to allow for a building addition and additional surface parking, located at 2131 N. Frontage Road/Lot 3, Vail Das Schone 3rd Filing. Applicant: Safeway, Inc., represented by Dennis Wyatt Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 12,1996 ll1/lIlllll 5. Information Update 6. Approval of July 8, 1996 minutes Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. Community Development Department Published July 19, 1996 in the Vail Trail. 40 Agenda last revised 7/22/96 4pm PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Monday, July 22, 1996 FINAL AGENDA Proiect Orientation / Lunch - Communitv Develooment Department: 12:30 pm Site Visits 1:00 pm 1. Pomboy - 781 Potato Patch 2. Lodges at Timber Creek - 2833 Kinnickinnick Road Driver: Dominic Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a worksession to discuss a variance to allow detached garages in the front setback, located at 2853 and 2833 Kinnickinnick Road/Lots 7 & 8, Block 4, Vail Intermountain/Lodges at Timber Creek. Applicant: Jim Marx is Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 12, 1996 2. A request for an exterior addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 781 Potato Patch/Lot 21, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Sissel and Richard Pomboy Planner: Dominic Mauriello MOTION: Gene Uselton SECOND: Galen Aasland VOTE: 7-0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 3. A request for an interior remodel to add a bedroom and bathroom of approximately 250 sq. ft., in the existing basement utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 1645 Golf Terrace, Vail Golfcourse Townhomes, Unit 432. Applicant: Jeff Lutz Planner: Lauren Waterton STAFF APPROVED 4. A request for a landscape variance to allow for a building addition and additional surface parking, located at 2131 N. Frontage Road/ Lot 3, Vail Das Schone 3rd Filing. Applicant: Safeway, Inc., represented by Dennis Wyatt Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 12, 1996 Agenda last revised 7/22/96 4pm 5. Information Update 6. Approval of July 8, 1996 minutes Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TOO for information. Community Development Department Published July 19, 1996 in the Vail Trail. is ?7-- MEMORANDUM • TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 22, 1996 SUBJECT: A request for a worksession to discuss a variance to allow detached garages in the front setback, located at 2853 and 2833 Kinnickinnick Road/Lots 7 & 8, Block 4, Vail Intermountain/Lodges at Timber Creek. Applicant: Jim Marx Planner: Dominic Mauriello 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is requesting variances to allow the construction of a detached parking garage. The request is to construct 6 garage spaces now and 4 additional spaces in the future. Two specific variances are requested including a variance from the front setback requirement of 20' for the Residential Cluster (RC) zone district and a variance from Section 18.14.040 Accessory Uses which allows attached garages as an accessory use in the RC zone district. The proposed garage is located 12' from the front property line, (see the attached plan). • The proposal will impact the existing number of parking spaces located on-site by reducing 10 surface spaces to 6 enclosed parking spaces now and providing 10 enclosed spaces in the future. Phase I of the Lodges at Timber Creek has 10 units requiring 20 parking spaces and the site contains 26 parking spaces. Therefore, this Phase of the Lodges will have 22 parking spaces (26 in the future) if approved. Phase II of the Lodges at Timber Creek has excess surface parking. The RC zone district requires that at least one parking space per dwelling unit be an enclosed space. The existing Phase I development is nonconforming with respect to this requirement. The proposal will make this development less nonconforming and the second phase of the garage request will make the development conforming with respect to enclosed parking. 0 a II. ZONING ANALYSIS This analysis shows the limiting zoning parameters derived from either the annexation agreement or the RC zone district and the November 13, 1995 amended development plan. 0 Zoning: RC ALLOWABLE/REQUIRED 11/13/95 APPROVAL PROPOSAL Site Area: 222,849 sq. ft. nc nc Buildable Area: 166,277 sq. ft. nc nc GRFA: 45,169 sq. ft. 12,212 sq. ft. 26.257 sq. ft. 38,469 sq. ft. nc Density: 24 multi-family DU's 10 multi-family DU's 12 duplex DU's - 4 Tvos III EHU's (1/2 unit each) 24 DU's total nc Height: 33 ft. 31'-6" Lg. DU's nc 29'-4" Sm. DU's nc Site Coverage: 57,712 sq. ft. 24,445 sq. ft. 26,049 sq. ft. Parking: 20 spaces' 26 spaces (existing)' 24 spaces' (26 spaces future)' Enclosed Parking: 10 spaces 0 spaces 6 spaces (10 spaces future) • t only. Phase 111. ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Detached Garages The applicant is proposing to vary from the RC zoning requirements which recognize only attached garages as permitted accessory structures. The staff encourages property owners to provide enclosed parking. Staff believes the concept of a detached garage is appropriate for this zone district where structures are clustered. Front Setback Variance The applicant is requesting a front setback variance to locate the detached structure within 12' of the front property line (20' required). Staff believes this request should not be approved. There is ample space on the site to locate the proposed structure and meet all setbacks. The staff finds no hardship of any kind affecting the location of the proposed structure. Staff believes it would be a grant of special privilege if this request were to be approved. f:\everyone\pec\memos\timberc.722 2 0 On-site Parkinq The proposal will eliminate 10 surface parking spaces and provide 6 enclosed parking • spaces for a net loss of 4 parking spaces with the existing request. The future phase of this garage request will provide 10 enclosed parking spaces with no net loss of parking. The site contains areas for surface parking, however, none of this parking is delineated. The site is currently in excess of the required parking and therefore staff believes the proposal will not negatively impact the number of required parking spaces on-site. Staff also believes that all of the surface parking located on-site should be clearly delineated. Landscaping The proposal will modify the landscaping located on-site. The existing landscape area affected by the proposal is 780 sq. ft. The first phase of the garage (6 spaces) will provide 1,774 sq. ft. of landscape area (994 sq. ft. additional). However, the second phase of the garage (10 spaces) will only provide 758 sq. ft of landscape area (22 sq. ft decrease). Therefore, the applicant, prior to final review, must provide either an additional 22 sq. ft. of landscape area or provide an analysis of the landscaping located on-site. The code requires that 60% of the site be landscape area. Also, the applicant has not provided a proposed landscape plan with this request. The proposal includes some regrading within an area adjacent to a large tree. Staff believes a landscape plan, a landscape analysis, and a tree preservation plan should be provided for final review by the PEC and the DRB. Architectural Compatibility The proposed structure contains some log elements and wood (log veneer) siding. The Lodges at Timber Creek development contains log structures. Staff believes the detached garage should be designed to be more compatible with the existing structures on-site. The detached garage should be a log structure. Staff believes that the PEC should recommend that the DRB to take a close look at the architectural compatibility of the proposed structure. Dum;2ster There is an existing dumpster within this parking area which is not screened and not indicated on the site plan. Staff believes that this dumpster should be fenced and located within the confines of the site. It should also be appropriately screened with landscaping. The applicant should include this item on the site plan and landscape plan for the site. IV. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The code criteria for the review of such a request are provided for your information. Since this is a worksession, staff has not addressed the specific criteria. A. Consideration of Factors: The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. • f:\everyone\pec\memos\timberc.722 3 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. B. The Plannina and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that doe not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. C. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Since this is a worksession to discuss the proposed variances at the Lodges at Timber Creek, staff will not be providing a formal staff recommendation at this time. Staff will, however, provide a staff recommendation at the time of final PEC review. • 0 f:\everyone\pec\memos\timberc.722 4 0 • CtW t?etN A' S ?µtNSU Y,t,I RA00 tt NM C0m / ,? v p ! / 1 1 f i et t' i / f f f l? ? { -it , *w, ff _? 1"^ - '? KINNININiCN "WD f?[Yf q yitq f B OW,W SCOS CpNTp? LNYCRVK ? t' US?S• DATUM CICVAitUt+?rt1£i ? 7!? A; 00.4d d UW t' J/ 1 rr?va? w.n ,. Vr1- mN. 1 w r a.T ? f 1 @'N INiI?,JpiTr??1fF8u F!9-1 '.Y'!W/'Nl.?L - --._.___?....-.__ 8UH8'f N6r rote, Vf Dk NLUNV {f,10 a'.NAf4 VfN'O?fO ,9'I?.GD-?980 CY-160 araiL II,IA14 V WB b. ••l.?nrvaL /L1 ,.4 '4Vrl I V111foav fe+av8 e.r+-? ivb"tr88 To n J cfLl' v.^,L f&WNYr' 4WY fi lamr.-?.t :f?-^ r? i vE,1GZ A??'?n?u?u KINNI?IN IGK RonO r\ NORTH ELEVATION 1 I/8 1'-0 ELOOR PLAN L/ ff = v-n- AST ELEVATION I/tl V-0 t SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 1 /K = 1'-0 J 1/8 = V-0- , I I ? ? I ? i ? I I OEM lJ !? ? J I I I 1 11 0 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Department of Community Development DATE: July 22, 1996 SUBJECT: A request for an exterior addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 781 Potato Patch/Lot 21, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Sissel and Richard Pomboy Planner: Dominic Mauriello 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST In 1985, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance 4, Series of 1985, which created a new Chapter (18.71) to the Vail Municipal Code, entitled "Additional Gross Residential Floor Area." The purpose of the Additional GRFA Ordinance is to provide an inducement for the upgrading of existing dwellings units, which have been in existence for a period of at least five years, by permitting up to two hundred fifty (250) square feet of GRFA (beyond the maximum allowance) to be added to a dwelling unit. Certain criteria must be met in order to allow the additional GRFA. In August 1995, the Town Council approved Ordinance 6, Series of 1995, which amended Chapter 18.71 by eliminating the ability to use the additional GRFA when a dwelling unit is a "demo/rebuild." The 1995 Ordinance also requires that all requests for additional GRFA, that involve exterior changes to a building, be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission. The applicant is requesting two 250 requests in order to expand the existing primary/secondary residence. The proposal adds 383 sq. ft. of new GRFA. Previously, 110 sq. ft. of a 250 request was utilized within this structure. The proposal reallocates GRFA for an existing crawl space area within the structure and expands Unit B beyond the existing building envelope. The site is in excess of the 20% site coverage limitation and therefore the applicant is removing a portion of a garage on-site to not further exacerbate on this requirement. The proposal also includes adding a pitched roof to the existing flat roof structure and reworking and heating the driveway. This request absorbs all but 7 sq. ft. of the potential GRFA allocated for the site under the 250 ordinance. See the attached drawings for more detail. The site is located in a moderate to high severity Rockfall Hazard Zone. The owner has provided a site specific study approving the proposed modifications without mitigation. • 1 II. ZONING ANALYSIS On May 26, 1981, the DRB approved this primary/secondary home. In 1990, Unit B of this duplex received 110 sq. ft. of additional GRFA as part of a 250 request. Unit A has not utilized the 250 Ordinance. The following table provides a summary of the zoning limitations for the site. Zoning: P/S Site Area: 18,543.5 sq. ft. Buildable Area: 18,543.5 sq. ft. Allowable/Required Existina Prooosed GRFA: 4,954 sq. ft. 5,529 sq. V N/A Two 250's: 5,454 sq. ft. 5,064 sq. ft. 5,447 sq. ft. Secondary unit: 2,066 sq. ft. (40%+425) 1,573.3 sq. ft. 1,939.3 sq. ft. +250 so _ ft. 2,316 sq. ft. Density: 2 DU's 2 DU's 2 DU's Height: 33 ft. 25' 31'-7" Site Coverage: 3,708.7 sq. ft. 4,086.61 sq. ft. (220/6)" 4,072.31 sq. ft. (21.9%) Parking: 5 spaces >10 spaces (4 enclosed) >10 spaces (3 enclosed) Landscaping: 11,126 sq. ft. (60% min.) 11,178.5 (60.28%) 11,514.3 sq. ft. (62%) "Includes 465 sq. ft. of illegally converted crawl space. "Existing noncon forming condition. III. -CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Chapter 18.71 - Additional GRFA, the Community Development Department • recommends approval of this request for additional GRFA based upon the following factors: A. Qqnsideration of Factors: Before acting on an application for additional GRFA, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: 1. Effect upon the existino _ poorapbr. veq,gtation. drainaq_ a and existinq Structures. The proposed additions will have minimal, if any, negative impact on the site. Portions of the site will be regraded due to additions and the elimination of pavement on-site. The proposed modifications improve the drainage and landscaping on-site. 2. Impact on adiacent q perties. The proposed remodel will not have a negative impact on adjacent properties. The proposal will add landscaping and the proposed pitched roof will add to the quality and aesthetics of the house. 3. Compliance with the Town's zoning requirement$ and applicable development standards. is 2 Section 18.71.020 (F) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code requires that any • dwelling unit that proposes to use Additional GRFA shall comply with the standards outlined in the Town of Vail Design Review Guidelines. These standards include landscaping, undergrounding of utilities, driveway paving and general maintenance of the property. The site has paved parking and adequate landscaping. All utilities are located underground. The property is well maintained. B. Findinas: The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting approval for Additional GRFA: 1. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA will not negatively affect existing topography, vegetation, drainage and existing structures. 2. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA will not negatively impact adjacent properties. 3. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA will comply with Town zoning requirements and applicable development standards as they apply to nonconforming sites and structures. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department staff recommends approval of this application for Additional GRFA subject to the following conditions: That the owner execute a Geologic Hazard owner affidavit prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the project. 2. That all proposed crawl spaces and attic spaces shall not be converted to habitable space. All existing crawispaces which are being modified, all new crawl spaces, and all new attic spaces shall have less than 5' in head height in accordance with Town policies. Staff believes that the review criteria have been met as discussed in the memo. Regarding the findings, staff believes that: finding B1 is met, as the proposed addition will have minimal impact on the existing site; finding B2 is met, as the proposed addition will not negatively impact adjacent properties; and finding B3 is met, as the proposed addition complies with the zoning requirements and applicable development standards. F:keveryone\peclmemoslpomboy.722 • 3 ?N Fm. p `'r 0.3• 0 h / 0.3• ? -//•?,Y .?` L As"'VE EXISTING ASPHALT PA VEMEN7 `sue LOT 22 ° / /1\\ EXISTING RETAINING ANLBE REFINISHED O^ / M A / - OMtEWAY ?, sFT °• ? •v?f ?v PARCEL C \\? h ssm \ \\\ 0.3• r \ EXISTING 7REE9 TO BE RElOCA7ED R8 A201 FOR EXACT LIMITS OF EXISTING GARAGE DEMOLTION // -? LREMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT -7 PARCEL B K=LLJ.LD L=127.30' T=65.35' LC= 125.69' CB=S 50 52'53" E ez o q O1 9T -- O q - 9Tc y of PARCEL C F * ?1-10 STMG??RREES TO \ MAIN. CO NT ACTOR TAKE NEC R °CAUTfONS TO \ 2TECT. LOCATION OF NEW EXTERIOR WALL rXISTING TRENCH TO REMAIN. SHORTENAIN AS SHOWN ON AN02 Lucca •?t '?I ASRI T ) a,.o REMOVE EXISTI STONE WALL S90 ST ING EXI ASPHALT PAVEMENT REMOVE EX15TING STONE FROM \\\???AGE OF WALL. RE, A102 \ R NFW WALL. \?\\' SHORTEN STRUCTURE 70 SO' ABOVE PAVERS REPIOVE ENTIRE 9TOI WALL THIS AREA REMOVE AND RELOCATE \ EXISTING SANDSTON NE PAVER TO SOUTH - \ PATIO. TIO. POTPRINT \ \ \ EXISTING BUILDING \ FOOTPRINT \ \ REMOVE AND STORE EX/STWG SANDSTONE PAVERS. RE. \ \` \ \ A102 FOR RELOCATION \ STONE WALL?? REMOVE EXISTINOG \ \ \ REMOVE EX15TGYG » ?? C STUD FRAMFD \\ \ \ \ STUCCO WALL /y \ 7 TRACT B \ X101 1,-MCL t ioN F14W PARCEL A REMOVE EXISTINO WOOD l / DECK 1 GATE PARCEL C /, \ ?' "- '`s'/' w"?• ?? w• \, o spwT ea.T UWT o.w _ ,2055 1 M per`{ QES( o 5 3602 W LOT 20 78( pUrx-,?,(v p it-+ L= 127.30' 922 T=fi5.35' ' LC= 125.69' °j• CB=S 50 52'53" E ?. y A I ES tX I EKIUR L/LH I t-IX' L EXTERIOR FIXTURES ' ff uzo q LOT 22 oT?T? 9 TC PROP05ED LAN05CAPE AREAS TIP. SOD TO o/? HATCH EX1571NG SPECfES ? 0I.8 PARCEL C / °'?• RELOCA TED eocc aF •? TREES.' RE: -ALT • (y NV I / \ .?0.1 3 .J .i 4 O^? I/ - 91.0 NEW tt'-O WIDE } --?------- CONIC DRAIN PAN PARCEL C Av S. / \ N TRENC DRA \ DRAIN iO REN \\ RE: AID? LI TjS?"'? .. •a o•\` DEryOL LJTlO 1 f\ W.S OFFSET r 7.0. RIDGE COVERAGE I / 0 `(' i07.G7' VE. AND EXISTJHF/STONE ) \ PAVE PAT104QJ REI7Af PA1CH 1 LO• / / _ \ / \\ / ' .T \ REPAII AS REQUIRED. T.O ORC / \r r'?? / \ T0 . LANO M GL \\ \i \ \\ EL. O' N STONE B\.3 \ \ EL FE E' POSTS / \ I/ !` / \ \\ / /?` T \ -7.0- RIDGE ?\ \ \ Lam' \ / AND LL. V ) a.r (OPEN E. J, T O. RIDGE 0.7' NO RAIL .? ? /(` \\ \\\ BUILDING/FO°VPRIN+l - T.O. RIDGE EL. ass, O.T APING \ -r-0RIDGE EL. 94.561" \ `k REMOVE EXISTING 131'-7' ABOVE /?-STONE PAVERS GRADE -fNpk PO/N7) / 1 \ \\ / / / / o.s° / _ ,\ \ ?• / / NE,dIIEXTERI R \ J \ \) / \ / ??.I HT FIXTUS OVE DECK PARCEL A sTysco T.O. FAVJ \\ FADE OF PROPO ABO L 0 ADDITI 7.0. RIDGE /1L \ \ V \ \ / / / \v ?? \.` \ EL. 117-5° \T.O. DEL R2, ' ERIOR OEeK G. lp6' \ PARCEL C \ STEEL FENCE POSTS / ONI TOOPCt SOT RAILS TRACT B 31-0' OFF 7 SETBACK ENCROACH T LINE X102 h IS' REAR SETBACK LiN? O/ tl coy LOT 20 781 oocem 0 a,• __ 0.7 n=tty•tn Ape MaT?S 65.35' A25.6g' 11,12E 5D- FT. v o%i G6=S 50 X253•' E t. LAN05GAPE AAREA ADJU5 MENTS GAINS D 1. LANpSGAPE TEy LAN05CAPE AREA p INpiGA 32?05 SO ,FT J ®3D?90 FT. 15 : 114.5q 50.FT. `- os ," ".,?'? sv ??Y b:.3q yD.F7 GAINED LANA5GAPE AREA T 7AL 70 EA L05 R A os• os. .:??'„• d'cS' r4o, E5 LANDSCAPE L •. ? 19L.53 50' FT. / ^~?"•?: I -,-.". -r?s 119.09 50 FT. f pp, RCEh C ` FT, 6q li sa . O 3?s.tt ya 1J Fr. NEp. yLAPE AREA 50 F LpST ' 7 GAI 222 TOTAL LAND CHANGE ,. 335.83 L•?. j `? ?..i a` O or.o LAN05GAPE AREA qo.s 81.6 SLOPE 41 5LOFE P i .tea'::?::1•::=-:?;=:::?•,'-' -. `•? M ,dry/ s?rNCKVk'n?.,,?a?.+•-•.?.• \' '•?•? J CFL C' 8"4, k f \ `'?•-...i i lam' ? ?? , f ss8a `•` ? ? ? ar LINE D TAGR FE`• E \ \ ` EXt5TlNr'REPAT WI .? 1 /`'OF B j YO gE CATION ar LEVEL ONE PATIO INC' ?"EXIgTLO AVVR / / ~ ~ `•? ARIAPAygR5PAtO pAgCEL A AREA .:45 g0. FT. \. \ EXiyTING Dg9 5Q F1. ar _ ARIA K o.s. ?•• ..,1 \ ~ , \ j AREA DEC J'.5 SO. FT. : VE ANO RESPNE RE N a IN ~ L TWO os PAVER °A E5RELOGAT TO L DW0 ARDEC< ?- OECKD °Z+ N15 A A ` LEVEL TW \ as. 424,7„ W ?? ~? ?\.. /?? ".. /• ?, ?ry.?/?J R? -?,E'? \ a. b •-?6 '07vi ' LpT 20 TRACE B `?` ?/YE \ \ !II I 1e10T Df/PEI ? 1 u III- F IDIO1 BFDI IBIDW NALLI /y E t DATH //\\ _ r - / AR acaR 3 / ?'B. )f-P WAKESSBI[ [RAWLSPACF I I wrrisvett ? A[Y IAx)r nECH Bm?lX amr IEAru AID RRRACF TO RBIAPL RBOGlE CMBNSrNN AW dCT. ANi Ari AAX N A IBaa BEDI ?? ? x °L" RI=III' u 3 T D MACC^'°RE /'suR.+eKE 8101 SPA I Jma " ???ROae II II?Ih?IIIIF=-II?. ? ?? I PII'fr _ _ ?YACGESSYEGRAlLWAG[ Td /dP STAR AXp OE/AE! IA103 BE it e> / O 1 ? wW rRA DACE i / W . P117 Us/ sum , ? / I I ? 1RBIOVE END /BIRDrrrF -a'-- AL rl ?" / II 4REnACE rrN'rL // I I I // R?DIA?irruY,e?? IAI IrD SrR.enau 11L?g/ °UT I \\O J LEVEL ONE ?2Q1 FLOOR FLAN {f y?,; f.110N ?fo s4e4 /= NORTH rbtlo ( { r-51 or ? e S YS TEN NOTES r-o• n'-a r-o• \ \ txrf.* mugs BW - N 58000 ON ry AL LAM ON ENI5TR6 5NEATV ON A%Bi31O WALL Sys.". 4EPASi / REFUGE E%BT ryA TERM! 9 ! 1 S RFOWRm. _ HlT - MEN 5Ttl000 ON NETAL LATH ON 311' E%T KYWOO 1 9AEA,AMG A IX $/I O.C. W RAN DATT ALL t E& I I? ' JM1 \ /\ VxN?ES.s iD'?n?r W ? ETmr:I.ia DcDBAUr uDi FRAU m+u c NEV i' STONE VENEER ON EN YK NN'NG S ARO WNL /REFUGE TpO ryA)ERLi45tS AS REOMIRFII YSTBi. RfRAR E?15 TONE VENEER PN 3/T EXTE%OR PLYWOOD \ \ / / ---1 \ sH GRAYSP OD! ax zN rRArpxc IRE:srrrucn m R-v \ 9ATr IN AWX W/ VAPoR BARRIER W r/Y OYPSWI WOARO. AOABT - OEPTN AS LS-O SO BON X \ X µ)fRxIR AMO CNTPJOR WALLS SWMACES ARf PUCEO \ F/ \ \ Al YSN WTH ETISTHG A6IACENT 5-A-L $ ON x DhTifNS ON 30T IFLt 011SCEOAR SHMUt EXTE.- nYW00D SHEA)M'HO ON' 3% IIU00 / FRAIS'Mfi 9I5lEry IRE: STnKrA / I I / LWE aE ASW PAro J,? \ uL? s/r erP m. ox x Puea'w Ni RGm a wt ox r cm - - - Ar _ _ = ADOVF \ COMC WI[[ W DA0`NO-. II ?W BTOR 1 ? ? / \ \ / \ ?I ?? / \ ' I IYAt'tY.l.L4E ClAY.YACE II \ j l III I1 low BED I \ I B • s_ S YS TEl7 NOTES r-o• n•-o• s•-o• EXTEROR LLLL3 !^ \ ?? \ SO S TT D.I OrEIM1 R?fPIA?CE EXBrERNLS A RE r------ ------------------1 I II fRl ilOOt EJI - NEI 3TJD00 ON 1ETAl UTN ON 31f - - \ /?. k.y. 31rtArNrG Ox 2x3M3•B-oc.uR-tf eArt RBw 1 I I -------- I d/ u vAPOR eABe1Be u s/r crPSln eoaRO. ovERau au I I I )NKXMESS )0 RA>CM ExBItYG ADJaDENT W L I 1 1 _ A?Y5)EL NBf V STONE VENEER ON EXbTpO SNEAiN.WG AHD II,LLt I ----- -I rfl FLODII ? RFPAAR / REW.ALE E%b)lYG IMIERL45 AS RFgARFII ? O \ \ EW - NH f' STONE VENEER p1 3/f EXTERIOR PL IB000 I - ^ _ I / [L AO &ATr#RID CK 2X f IRESTRJC)1 YV R- I 11 BOO! II 41Tl NXlArpMY/VA BARBER d/f/!' GYP" RBXnE EX6 -W BOARD. ADABT I - DEPT N A9 -m 90 EO Tl TN dNLS DOOR 1 -1 II X Ev AMD ll EXTRt R IALLS SIRfALES ORE PIARO I %A4 ErG A! II \ Af flJ3M Wnl fXbTNG AO.MClNr 9JRfACE3 / ? II M 11L I \\ / / /\? \ R 0 ?ttOain DLES ON IN DAlTENS ON 30• fBT 11 ON AOR PL 3NEA)H 2K T 11 vl. `EXIT f4t flOpP lRAIBXi 31WM IRE: 3-1J kT ItN131 '-j ? ? FL YO ? L413 1 II R II ? IEL FIOOR ?\ WNG YALLr?!lA?OMHfY1?4PoAGURKA N3LL OIIYGW ' -- L 1 1 ?1 FABT/IC lot ? 1 r+aBOx ro A.'ORIVNG i ? ? ? \ ? RH aoa• ? p II ? - r G13 fREPlACl AIB \ FOpNE BOSDYD iOR I ?A201 GARAGEI liCNE 3100b'YID \ ~ ?tLM? 3 Yr?EXUiroIG?rtll fl \ / IRBUYE EXBiNG BFYCN I y , ? • A?COAK7 ? R ? / / yy V \ ?NID C/Offi i - IL91CW13iIhK1A24 Y ) -{II- '!i' ?B2B LIVING' \ I82B ENTRT.f ' L_; I l II ?I J I JI I E2H POGVER I 11 I \\\\,\ luulll '? fN ftMR \ 'I 10213 BATH, ?L- d -Y?°'? ' IIIIIF - IA2D2 KITCHENI T \ ??j` ? ? RBNIYl OJSTNG -?? 1111. DOCK I/BANE ??\c'\\\\\\\ X 11 I ?:?• \ ?NI--y1 I t e / \ \ \ 1820 GARADEI r AaX ? IN f100R 11 ®® \ ? YEL B4iC II .I \ \I ?\ ? 8211 KtTCNEN I I LA1091DININ4? ? g nl? O \ I 15- DINING I \ \ \ _ W o _=__.=3?\ RK ffooa ?? ® ? _ ? 5 I O 'Y" Mb i --.___--__ IA2DILVINDI -? N B \\? 1B21D STAIR I E- ?? ?//dEl10YE MLL 2 A •?- Irl/Gq r ?7 I ? II II /?I? ? ? ?J7/ IA203 LAJNDRTI /Il kIXXt A Ni VT D ,/? \A203 HALLI 1A201 WD 1 ``? ? , /Yl ftLtlR D I - V B coo m O b. \ LFVFL TCUO FLOOD' LAN HIV ss . No NORTH Por?C?Y f? • .. • g B NO ?T L 8 3551 3' ! DFMICl, • S YS TEM NO TES E% &E 231L13 EW - Mi 5=W m METAL LAIN OA EM l- SNEATHMG ql EXISTS, WU SYSTEM WAR / REFUGE EXIST MATERIALS AS REOUP.EO. tN<I - NEY STNXO ON METAL UTH ON 3/1• - PC rL 9NEATMMD ON W STLOS W .C. V All BAR- IXISTNG A- NT -OVFRWI .11 DSYSTE". -AR ? YREP CE EMS T WEEFNLIS AS R EW -NEW f' S101ff VENEER QN 31Y ENTflbOR P IRW 5!IEATNMD ON W fRANIL IRE:STRNCTI V R-L DATT M5MAWK V VAMR SARRMR D/ S/S' DYPMM ,M A-ST DAIS W. AS REOl 0 SO W. MT? fLYS THNEa]$TNO AG PULED ENT $YRfA l RDD& % - Cf, SMNGLESON M DA TI ON 30? EELT RAVI C 515M IM S-r? M4L! C - 5/1' ED. ON x FIMRII?G Y/ R.GD MMW ON T CJP CONC .11 1 V DAMPRQ4M4 MT RDSf erLa e Afar i • ID301 B I \\//// LEVEL THREE \.' FLOOR FLAN I.No NORTH PCM-.ter n r/ NGEr B B R1 \ Js \ B ---4I--? 0 S YS TEl7 NOTES r-o• n•-o• s•-o• EXIERWA aS EkflTNG SYEATMNG ON FI - T "" "T" 0" EYISTMD RAL BALL 3 YST ltER PFPAM /REPLACE FklST IIATEA'Nls As REgMED ERS - NFY STUCCO OR MIA, UTN DN 3/1' EkI PL TWOD SIEATMW ON )k !MI! • R' O.C. V R-OI MfT MSLL V VAPOR DARAfER YY in' GYPSLV!WO OVDRALL DA[t TMCKNW TO RAI" ENISIMG AOIACBNT RALL TMG SNEATMND AND EAL[ ( 1 w - NTB I. STONE =ow,. SYSTEL REPAAP /MG RA 2R" AS RCOYtlRFll II! SO, - NH , STDAE VENEER ON ,/f FXTERNM PLYEOOD SNEATN ON U AlMMO RTEST "V R-)) DATT M IATIOR V VAPOR DARKER V ln• OYPl BOARD. A ' RAL[ OEPTR AS AY{x . SO BDTM % TERKNE A. E%TRIOR R SYRINGES H ARE PUL20 AT USR tl N E M A6G W SxAYALEA RGn-$=AR SMM SRIXI TIfg 1EA h DATTENS ON )b 1LYT OM 3/1' EXTFRKNi TNMD ON )k qOD TIPAMY lYSTEx IRE: STR h / r[e sn• crP eD ox x weMw Ri RIWO Msu ox r ar ? - - . - - - _ -- ? I - _ _ F/ CORC ICA[[ V Oa1PA'O.vPM'i ? -_? -- • TA. R.OOE ( I ' / PL pY) ? I I I ) II ? I Q -- I I I --_ ?,---- -------- , - --? II I ? ICI - "I !! ?/? II I i ITY T ; -- Y 1 --Q . .H 7L- ROOF FLAN IV fjCE, - , ', • Cu( ` NORTH 0 0 0 r [;I - - - - - - rte. Y d?1 s ro n? - ra. ,rote . _ ¢ pC-1 gIOE4 - ?? `? l 1 II MIMHY'-1 0 rx ne a x-cx-c NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: V4"=l'-O" NORTH r TO. RAy 5 Y5 TE1l NOTES I.O. ME -.- -- -- - a r-I &-W 3-- * a m4 -T H I -;I MruAra A M N'R xa - ciaeR? - M/IRAx-0 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 114"=l'-O" 1 4 _ N?- ? MRRArYN ' M R1! 6 b-/ - s ra ¦ K1C4 SYSTEM NOTES M-a W. H' [i/IRY 1/Y? M ItRAr-0 yirrM M R.lA ry - -- --. -- qI NPA 1NNPC xJ -- ?LOIB11lYH M FLP fl lI-p I WEST ELEVATION ( 5 a,4 Q Z ---?-- SCALE: 119"=l'-0" ? NORTH .?.? farts "nln6 " 7( ;170 -TA PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION • July 22, 1996 Minutes MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Greg Moffet Mike Mollica Greg Amsden Dominic Mauriello Henry Pratt Judy Rodriguez Galen Aasland Gene Uselton Diane Golden John Schofield PUbiic Hearing 2:00 p.m. The meeting was called to order by Greg Moffet at 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a worksession to discuss a variance to allow detached garages in the front setback, located at 2853 and 2833 Kinnickinnick Road/Lots 7 & 8, Block 4, Vail Intermountain/Lodges at Timber Creek. Applicant: Jim Marx Planner: Dominic Mauriello is Henry Pratt made a motion to table items 1, 3 and 4 until August 12, 1996. The motion was seconded by Greg Amsden. The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0. 2. A request for an exterior addition utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 781 Potato Patch/Lot 21, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Sissel and Richard Pomboy Planner: Dominic Mauriello Dominic Mauriello explained that the applicant was requesting to use all the remaining GRFA for the property, with two 250's. The applicant has provided a site-specific hazard study approving the additions without mitigation. Dominic also stated that there were minimal impacts to the topography. The proposed landscaping and roof addition will add to the quality and aesthetics of the house. Staff is recommending approval with the two conditions, as stated in the staff memo. The 2nd condition was added because there was crawlspace that was converted without Town approval. The 250 is not intended for a demo-rebuild. Dominic stated that staff wanted to make it clear that if the house is demolished to a point of being classified as a demo-rebuild, the applicant is not entitled to a 250 request. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes July 22, 1996 1 w" Bill Pierce, the architect, was present on behalf of the applicant, but had no comment. Henry Pratt wanted to make it clear that the applicant is over on their site coverage because the site coverage rules were changed after this structure was built and the site is therefore a legal non-conforming use. There were no other comments from the other Commissioners. Gene Uselton made a motion to approve the request with the two conditions as stated in the staff memo. Galen Aasland seconded the motion. Galen wanted it reflected that he supported what Henry Pratt said regarding the site coverage. Mike Mollica said that prior to the issuance of a building permit, staff will confirm that the site is legally non-conforming with respect to site coverage. Galen Aasland also supported the comment that they not tear down and rebuild the structure. The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0. 3. A request for a landscape variance to allow for a building addition and additional surface parking, located at 2131 N. Frontage Road/ Lot 3, Vail Das Schone 3rd Filing. Applicant: Safeway, Inc., represented by Dennis Wyatt Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 12,1996 4. A request for an interior remodel to add a bedroom and bathroom, in the existing basement utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 1645 Golf Terrace, Vail Golfcourse Townhomes, Unit 432. Applicant: Jeff Lutz Planner: Lauren Waterton TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 12,1996 5. Information Update Mike Mollica said there was no Information Update. 6. Approval of July 8, 1996 minutes Greg Amsden had a change on page 9. Henry Pratt had a change on page 5. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes July 22, 1996 2 • is Greg Moffet had a change on page 6. is Greg Amsden made a motion for approval as amended. Henry Pratt seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0-1, with Galen Aasland abstaining. Greg Amsden made a motion to adjourn. Henry Pratt seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned at 2:10 p.m. • Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes July 22, 1996 3