Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-0125 PECTHIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on January 25, 1999, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request for modifications from a previously granted conditional use permit, located at 19 Vail Road 1 Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Vail Interfaith Chapel, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Jeff Hunt A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20% on a Primary/Secondary Residential zoned lot, located at 362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: George Ruther A request for an amendment to an approved development plan, to allow for an increase in site coverage and reconfiguration of a building envelope, located at 1850 S. Frontage Road West/Lot 6, Alpine Creek Townhomes. Applicant: Jim & Sharon Fowler, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Smith Planner: George The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published January 8, 1998 in the Vail Trail. C] TOWNO VY ?? PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Monday, January 25, 1999 AGENDA Proiect Orientation / LUNCH - Communitv Development Department AIPP Master Plan - "Focus" group discussion- Nancy Sweeney Com Dev Liaison to AIPP - Jeff Hunt - 1 hour MEMBERS PRESENT Site Visits : 1. Fowler - 1850 S. Frontage Rd. West Driver: George 12:00 p.m. 1:30 p.m. NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00-6:30 p.m. Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for modifications from a previously granted conditional use permit, located at 19 Vail Road / Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Vail Interfaith Chapel, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Jeff Hunt 2. A request for an amendment to an approved development plan, to allow for an increase in site coverage and reconfiguration of a building envelope, located at 1850 S. Frontage Road West/Lot 6, Alpine Creek Townhomes. Applicant: Jim & Sharon Fowler, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Smith Planner: Allison Ochs 3. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion at the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 East Lionshead Circle/ Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Odell Architects Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 22, 1999 4. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20% on a Primary/Secondary Residential zoned lot, located at 362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village, First Filing. Applicant: Waiter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Allison Ochs i "V oFUArc TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 22, 1999 TO 1 MEMBERS ABSENT, 5. A request to amend the Town's "Public Accommodation" Zone District, Chapter 7 and amendments to Chapter 15, Cross Residential Flour Area (GRFA), Town of Vail Municipal Code. Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: George Luther TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 22, 1 999 6. Information Update 7. Approval of January 11, 1998 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published January 22, 1998 in the Vail Trail 2 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE Monday, January 25, 1999 FINAL AGENDA Proiect Orientation / PEC LUNCH - Communitv Develooment Department AIPP Master Plan - "Focus" group discussion- Nancy Sweeney Com Dev Liaison to AIPP Jeff Hunt.-1 hour MEMBERS PRESENT Greg Moffet John Schofield Galen Aasland Diane Golden Ann Bishop Brian Doyon Site Visits : 1. Fowler - 1850 S. Frontage Rd. West Driver: George 0 1[*]n 12:00 p.m. 1:30 p.m. NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearinq, - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for modifications from a previously granted conditional use permit, located at 19 Vail Road / Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Vail Interfaith Chapel, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Jeff Hunt MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 4-1-1 (Brian Doyon recused and John Schofield opposed) APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS: 1. The approval is subject to compliance with the conditional use permit approved on August 24, 1998. 2. Should the use create significant conflicts with adjacent properties, including traffic congestion or parking, then this permit may be revoked by the Planning and Environmental Commission. TOWNO 1 MEMBERS ABSENT Tom Weber 2. A request for an amendment to an approved development plan, to allow for an increase in site coverage and reconfiguration of a building envelope, located at 1850 S. Frontage Road West/Lot 6, Alpine Creek Townhomes. Applicant: Jim & Sharon Fowler, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Smith Planner: Allison Ochs MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Galen Aasland VOTE: 6-0 1. That all other conditions from the previous April 27, 1992 approval be met including: a. Maintain a ten foot separation between buildings b. GRFA is limited to 2300 sq. ft. C. Height is limited to 32 ft. 2. That all conditions stated in the approval letter (attached) from the Alpine Creek Townhomes be met prior to Design Review Board approval. 3. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion at the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 East Lionshead Circle/ Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Odell Architects Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 22,1999 4. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20% on a Primary/Secondary Residential zoned lot, located at 362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 22,1999 5. A request to amend the Town's "Public Accommodation" Zone District, Chapter 7 and amendments to Chapter 15, Gross Residential Floor Area (GRF-A), Town of Vail Municipal Code. Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 22, 1999 6. Information Update 7. Approval of January 11, 1998 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department ? ?-l 2 MEMORANDUM, TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: January 25, 1999 SUBJECT: A request for modifications from a previously granted conditional use permit for the Vail Interfaith Chapel, located at 19 Vail Road/ Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village 1 St. Applicant: Vail Interfaith Chapel, represented by Gwathmey/Pratt Architects Planner: Jeff Hunt 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is requesting the modification of a conditional use permit that was approved on August 24, 1993. The approval was for a two-story building with the upper level to house clergy offices and consultation areas. The request is to allow the lower level of the building to be used as a shelter for stranded travelers. The request only involves the use of the previously approved building and does not include any expansion of the building. II. ZONING ANALYSIS This site is zoned General Use (GU) which allows churches and related facilities subject to the review and approval of a conditional use permit. The development standards for the GU district are determined by the PEC. The PEC must determine what development standards are needed on a site specific basis. The standards, below, were approved by the PEC for the conditional use permit for the building: Zoning: General Use (GU) Lot area: 31,611 sq. ft. ( 0.726 acres) Standard Allowed GU Existinq, Proposed Total Building height: PEC n/a 28' highest ridge/29.5' to top of cupola Landscape area: PEC 13,950 sq. ft. (44%) 10,400 sq. ft. (33%) Site Coverage: PEC 4,514 sq. ft. (14%) 7,264 sq. ft. (23%) Parking: PEC 31 spaces 37 spaces 1 MW*VA& Ill. RENAEW CRITERIA FOR THIS REQUEST 0 The code criteria for review of a conditional use permit are included below. In addition to the conditional use criteria, staff has included the purpose statement from the zoning code, as we believe this will help the PEC in its evaluation of the request. The Vail Interfaith Chapel is located in the General Use (GU) zone district. According to Section 12-9C-1 of the Zoning Regulations, the purpose of the GU district is: to provide sites for public and quasi-public uses which, because of their special characteristics, cannot be appropriately regulated by the development standards prescribed by other zoning districts, and for which development standards especially prescribed for each particular development proposal or project are necessary to achieve the purposes prescribed in Section 12-1-2 and to provide for the public welfare. The General Use District is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi-public uses permitted in the District are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and, in cases of buildings and other structures, to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of uses. A church shall be permitted in the GU zone district subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16, Conditional Use Permits. For the PEC's reference, the conditional use permit purpose statement indicates that: in order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional use permit= Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with respect to their affects on surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permit shall be denied. The conditional use permit consideration of factors is as follows: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. Staff believes the proposed use is consistent with the development objectives of the Town. This quasi-public use provides benefits to the Town of Vail citizens. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. L...J 2 Staff believes the proposed use will have little impact on these criteria. The use will not add additional building mass to the site and will be contained within the building. The use should have little if any impact on adjacent properties with respect to fight and air. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. The proposed use would only occur on those occasions when travel is restricted, such as with the closure of Vail Pass. This traditionally occurs about 3-6 times a year. The situation in town could be considered as an emergency. It is anticipated that there would be up to about 15 people using the lower level for shelter. The number of people using the lower level would be far less than the number of people who use the chapel for worship. Furthermore, many of the stranded travelers would have already parked their vehicles somewhere in town. However, it is likely the chapel parking lot and surrounding streets could become overwhelmed, especially if the emergency occurred on a day of worship. But, because this use would occur so infrequently and because of the emergency nature of the use, traffic, circulation and parking should not be taken into account at this time. This Chapter provides that conditional use permits may be , revocable. This should be a condition of approval, in case the use creates conflicts. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. The use would only occur 3-6 times a year. The scale of use is minimal due to the very few times that the use would occur. Staff believes the proposed use is consistent with the character of the area. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followinra findings before tarantino a conditional use hermit: That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. 3 IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval of the modification to the conditional use permit allowing the lower level to be used as a temporary shelter for stranded travelers, subject to the following findings: That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. The recommendation of approval is also subject to the following conditions: The approval is subject to compliance with the conditional use permit approved on August 24, 1998. 2. Should the use create significant conflicts with adjacent properties, including traffic congestion or parking, then this permit may be revoked by the Planning and Environmental Commission. F:\EVERYO NE\P EC\MEMOS\99\VlChapel ?J 4 MEMORANDUM TO. Planning and Environmental Commission FROM. Community Development Department DATE: January 25, 1999 SUBJECT: A request for an amendment to an approved development plan located at 1850 S. Frontage Rd. W.1 Lot 6, Alpine Creek Townhomes, Phase III Applicant: Jim and Sharon Fowler, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Smith Architects Planners Allison Ochs 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicants are requesting an amendment to a 1992 approved development plan for Alpine Creek Townhomes, originally Spruce Creek, Phase III. The 1992 approval allowed for 6 single-family residences, with 2,300 sq. ft. of GRFA and 1,325 sq. ft. of site coverage per unit. The applicants are requesting a change to the site coverage allowed by the approved development plan, while remaining within allowable GRFA. The applicant's reasoning for this request, along with the Alpine Creek Townhome Association letter of approval have been attached. Lots 1 through have already been constructed. The current proposal is a request for an increase in the allowable site coverage, allocated to Lot 6. While GRFA remains at 2,300 sq. ft., the applicants are proposing approximately 1,660 sq. ft. of site coverage, an increase of 335 sq. ft. II. BACKGROUND In 1979, Eagle County approved a three phase development plan for Spruce Creek, allowing for 33 dwelling units and 57,750 sq. ft. of GRFA. Originally, Phase Ill was approved for 12 units and 21,000 sq. ft. of GRFA. On August 12, 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved 6 single family homes with a total of 13,800 sq. ft. of GRFA. On October 14, 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a proposal for 5 single family dwelling units while all other development standards remained the same. On April 27, 1992, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a proposal to return to the 6 single family dwelling units, while all other development standards remained the same. These development standards included 2300 sq. ft. of GRFA per unit and 1325 sq. ft. of site coverage per unit. TOW%VAIL This request is before the Planning and Environmental Commission because of a requirement passed by ordinance soon after West Vail was annexed. Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1981, stipulates that major changes to development plans for certain developments within the West flail annexation area be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission. No criteria for evaluation were given, except that Residential Cluster was to be considered the underlying zone district for development standards. ZONING STATISTICS Site Area: 101,128 sq. ft. Buildable Area: 74,531.2 sq. ft. Zoning: Residential Cluster 1979 Eagle County Residential 1999 Aooroval duster 1992 Agoroval Prooosal Density 12 DU's 6 DU's per acre of 3.5 DU's per acre no change buildable = 6 DU's =10.3 DU's GRFA 21,000 sq. ft. 13,632 sq. ft. 12,300 sq. fit. no change (1750 sq. ft. per unit) (1319 sq. ft. per (2050 + 250 sq. ft. per allowable unit) unit) Site 25,232 sq. ft. 25,282 sq. ft. 7,950 sq. ft. 1,660 sq. ft. Coverage (2,107 sq. ft. per (2,454.5 sq. ft. per (1,325 sq. ft. per unit) unit) allowable unit) Height 33 ft. 33 ft. 32 ft. no change Setbacks 20715715715' 20715715715' 267797207100' no change IV. DISCUSSION Staff believes that the proposal is consistent with the development of the Alpine Creek Townhomes. The proposed increase in site coverage from the previously approved development is an increase of 335 sq. ft., but remains under the site coverage allowed by the original 1979 development plan and Residential Cluster Zoning. Architecturally, the residence will be similar to the existing townhomes, but not identical (see attached sketch) and subject to Design Review Board approval. The proposed increase in site coverage for lot 6 is similar to the ratio of building site coverage to lot size for the existing Alpine Creek Townhomes. 2 V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this amendment to the Alpine Creek / Spruce Creek, Phase III development plan based on the following findings: 1. That the increase in site coverage, while an increase from the 1992 approval, is a reduction in allowable site coverage from both the 1979 Eagle County Approval and Residential Cluster Zoning. 2. That the ratio of building site coverage to lot area is similar to existing development. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this amendment, staff recommends the following condition: 1. That all other conditions from the previous April 27, 1992 approval be met including: a. Maintain a ten foot separation between buildings b. CRFA is limited to 2300 sq. ft. C. Height is limited to 32 ft. 2. That all conditions stated in the approval letter (attached) from the Alpine Creek Townhomes be met prior to Design Review Board approval. VAiLDATA\EVERYONE\PEC\MEMOS\99\FOW LER 1191 E 3 'h 1 M Ma Dc.cernber 21, 1998 3 6 RITZLE. PIERCE SMITE A R C N I T E C Dear Toti of Vail, Our association has rehired &,e proposed plans prepared by Fritzlen Pierze Smith Archilcjts A he?ialf nf Jim and Shamn. Fowler which include floor plans, sits plan and rendered perspective dmmriags. We have approved the residence as presented subject To final rcvieW Of eater Or materials mid landscaping improNerxaents. And subject to the attached letter dated Dec. 21, 1998. If you have any additional questions please call Ross Jansen out property manager at i-926=7991 ?irz?ereiy. Trudi Olsen ;'resident alpine Creek Toumhomes_ • December 21, 1998 Trudie Olson Engel President Alpine Creek Townhomes Vail Colorado FAX: 476-1780 re: Proposed Residence Lot 96 Dear Trudie, ERITZLEN PIERCE S I T H A R C H I T E C T S Thank you for taking the time to meet with myself and Sharon Fowler yesterday. It was my understanding that the association had the following concerns about proposed development on Lot 46: - Potential interruption of view corridors - Structured improvements in the common area not including landscape improvements and related retaining walls and terraces. -'T'hat the size of the unit not exceed the allowed for the existing units. - Continuity of design and materials As we discussed yesterday we clarified that the proposed residence addresses your concerns as per the following- -4> - The building footprint at grade (at the ground) is a minimum of 5' away from the property line and does not project into the western view from the existing townhomes back decks. - We are not proposing any enclosed building area in the common area. Except for the concrete driveway we agree not to encroach on any common area. This includes but is not limited to decks patios, overhangs and structures. The unit is proposed to be 2300 GRFA (Gross residential square footage) as regulated by the Town of Vail for all the Alpine Creek Townhomes. - It is our intention to match and/or complement existing materials and colors as we develop the design. We will present this information in the future for your review. -Landscaping will allow for placement of snow removed from driveway. I have drafted a letter of approval that we would need to proceed with the Town of Vail "Amendment to an Approved Development Plan" application. Ideally this letter would be on your letterhead and signed by yourself as the Association President. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Lynn Fritzlen AIA KA9888-Fowler\Project Correspondence\Olsen.wpd Planning 0 Architecture interiors 1650 East Vail Valley Drive Eallridge C-1 as Vail, CO 81657 * fps@colorado.net s fax (970) 476-4901 e (970) 476-6342 i I 5' s w W 3: - I 1;to- 6,VCA <--- ELEVATION m f 1 FRiT N PIERCE SMITH A§IC N1 TlClt ase?aeeomo ®t IA 01 t Soso= r ? 'W1 " ,--?- _ FRltl I 0 I PIERCE SMITH ?aa?aartaTa atae a+Yr Ra IeMyM JABO i 0 ,ao 44 i I t 1 t ?i t` r?' ? i77) I [? li ! i?, si } { F: 11 i i t- t it -t i t: ?r 1= _ i it i !t?fo i 2i r 'r it 1 r -B 93 FE] FIE] E qI 1'-g' ? ib' ....4 ? EAST ELEVATION mill I 1 ffZLEN PIERCE SMITH AICMI(TICT® ss ?srv> mpm? I A501 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION January 25, 1999 Minutes MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Greg Moffet John Schofield Galen Aasland Diane Golden Ann Bishop Brian Doyon Public Hearinq Tom Weber Greg Moffet called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. Dominic Mauriello Jeff Hunt Allison Ochs Judy Rodriguez 2:00 part. 1. A request for modifications from a previously granted conditional use permit, located at 19 Vail Road / Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Vail Interfaith Chapel, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Jeff Hunt Brian Doyon recused himself from this item. Jeff Hunt gave an overview of the staff memo. Greg Moffet asked if the applicant had anything to add. Karl Walker, President of the Vail Interfaith Chapel Foundation, said that the parking was an issue, but he did not see this adding any parking pressure to the Town of Vail and they added 6 parking spaces with the application. Greg Moffet asked for any public comments. There were no comments. John Schofield asked for assurances that this use will be for the Chapel events only and he added that the original approval required additional parking. Galen Aasland said he was less concerned about meetings at night, but he was concerned with any day events, such as daycare, etc. Ann Bishop had no comments. Diane Golden had no comments. Greg Moffet stated that the shelter occurred in off-hours and that this was the kind of stuff we want to have in our Town and not down valley. He said he was comfortable with approving this use in this place. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes January 25, 1999 Galen Aasland made a motion for approval, in accordance with the staff memo. Diane Golden seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4-1-1, with John Schofield opposed. 2. A request for an amendment to an approved development plan, to allow for an increase in site coverage and reconfiguration of a building envelope, located at 1 850 S. Frontage Road West/Lot 6, Alpine Creek Townhomes. Applicant: Jim & Sharon Fowler, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Smith Planner: Allison Ochs Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo. Greg Moffet asked if the applicant had anything to add. Lynn Fritzlen, representing Jim & Sharon Fowler, explained the application was before the PEC, as they needed to better match the site. Greg Moffet asked for any public comment. Bret Young, representing Jane Cohen, said he originally helped build the units with Mike Lauterback. He said he was concerned with one window in the sourtheast corner of Jane Cohen's home, which would be covered up by this building. He stated the approval letter from the Association did not include her permission (unit 5). Jane Cohen said the the project blocks her view the way it was planned. Lynn Fritzlen said the Association had properly approved this. Greg Moffet asked if the commissioners had any comments. Galen Aasland asked if the adjacents knew that this parcel could be sold off. He asked, regarding the access, if this was a right-of-way. Lynn F'ritzlen showed the line on a map. Galen Aasland said this request was an approvable project, but he wished all the property owners could have signed the approval letter. He said it would be a neighborly thing to work it out with the other party. Ann Bishop had no comments. Diane Golden said she would love to see the property owners get together to tweak this. Brian Doyon said the property owners should have reasonably assumed that there would be something there. John Schofield said, basically the owner could have placed the structure back without coming to us. He said the setbacks haven't changed and so the applicant could put the building anywhere they wanted. He then asked if the power lines were supposed to be underground. Manning and Environmental Commission 2 Minutes January 25, 1999 Dominic Mauriello stated that service to a home was all that needed to be underground for an individual home. Greg Moffet stated that private views were not recognized and the underlying zoning allowed higher density and that this was clearly allowed. John Schofield made a motion, in accordance with the findings in the staff memo. Galen Aasland seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0. 3. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion at the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 Fast Lionshead Circle/ Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Odell Architects Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 22, 1999 4. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20% on a Primary/Secondary Residential zoned lot, located at 362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 22, 1999 5. A request to amend the Town's "Public Accommodation" Zone District, Chapter 7 and amendments to Chapter 15, Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA), Town of Vail Municipal Code. Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 22, 1999 Brian Doyon made a motion to table items #4, #5 and #6 until February 22, 1999. John Schofield seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0. 6. Information Update Dominic Mauriello said there was no information update. 7. Approval of January 11, 1998 minutes. Galen Aasland and Brian Doyon had changes. Planning and Environmental Commission 3 Minutes January 25, 1999 Ann Bishop made a motion for approval of the minutes. Brian Doyon seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0-1 (Diane Golden abstained). Brian Doyon made a motion to adjourn. Ann Bishop seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0. The meeting adjourned at 2;35 p.m. 11 Planning and Environmental Commission 4 Minutes January 25, 1999