The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-0426 PEC ~ TN1S ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NQTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY G1VEN that the Planning and Environmental Cornmission of the Town of Vaii will hold a public hearing in accflrdance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on Apri126, 1999, at 2:00 P.M. in theTown of Vail Municipai Bui(ding. lncons'rderation af: A request far a variance from Sectian 12-6D-6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, ta a11ow for an encroachment into the required side setbacks,located at 3003 Be(Ifilower [Jrive / Lpt 9, Block 6, Vai( Intermtsuntain. Applicant: Mr. Guillermo Huerta Planner: George Ruther A request for a final review of an amendmertt to Special Development District No.4{Glen Lyon}, revising the Glen Lyon Office Building site (area D), lacated at 1000 S. Frontage Road West/Lot 54, Glen Lyon 5ubdivision. Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building F'artnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg Planner. Dominic Mauriello A request for a final review to discuss an amendment to Special Deuelopment District #30 (VAC), ta aflow for an addi#ional dwelling unit and reduction of aceommvdation units,located at the Vail Athletic Club, 352 E. Meadtiw Drive/Parcels A& B, Vail Village First Filing, ~ Applicant: JV1/T 1987 Limited Partnership, represented by John Perkins Planner. Dominic MauriellolBrent Wilson A request for a variance from Section 12-6C-6, to allow for the construction of a garage within a front setback and Seetion 12-10-8, ta allow for the constructPon of an undersizedgarage, located at 5125 Black Bear Lane ! Lot 11, Blaek 2, Gore Creek Subdivisian. Applicant: Montagomery (Mike) Mathias Planner: Allison Ochs A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6, to aIlow for a building encroachment into a rear setback, located at 2657 Arosa Drive / Lot 8, Block D, Vail Ridge. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs The applications and informationabout the prapasals are availabie fior public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Tawn of Vail Cammunity Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation aVailable upon request with 24 hnur notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published April 9, 1999 in the Vail Trail. ~ ~pp~/ TOTI/1' V*VAIL ~ PLANNING AND ENVIRt}NMENTAL Ct3N1iVI15a{C3N ~ PiJgLIC MEETING SCHEDUl,E Monday, April 26, 1999 AGENDA Proiect Orienta#ion 1 PEC IVD LUNCH - Communitv Development C3epartmen# 1:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT S~te Visits : 1:15 p.m. 1. Glen Lyan Office Buiiding -1t100 S. Frontage Rd. West Driver. George N07E: 1# the PEC hearing exCends until6.Op p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearinq -Town Cauncil Chambers 2:00 p.m. ~ 1. Swearing in of newv PEC members Chas Bernhardt and C7caug Cahilf and xeappointed PEC member John Scha#ieid - Lorelei Donaldson, Town Glerk. 2. Election of 1999 ChairNice-Chair. 3. A request for a#ina! review of an amendment ta Specia! Development District Noa 4 (Glen Lyon), revising the Gien Lyon Office Building site (Area D), located afi 1000 S. Frontage Raad WesttLat 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg Pianner: Dominic Maurieilo 4, A request far a final review of an amendmenf to Special Development aistrict #30 (VAC), to alfaw far an additianaf dwelling unit and the reduction of accommodation units, Iocated,at the Vail Athletic Glub, 352 E. Meadow DrivelParcels A& B, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: JWT 1987 Limi#ed Partnership, represented by John Perkins Planner: aominic Mauriello/8rent Wilson 5. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allnw for an encroachment intn the required side setbacks, Iocated at 3003 Se(lflower Drive 1 Lat 9, Block 6, Vai! Intermountain. Appl9cant: Mr. Guillermo Huerta Planner: George Ruther ~ TABLED UNTIL MAY 10,1909 T4WNi1F~Atl ~4 ~ . ~ 6. A request for a variance firom Section 12-6C-6, to allow for the construction of a garage within a front setback and Section 12-1 0-8, tQ allow for the construction of an urtdersized ~ garage, Iocated at 5125 Black Bear Lane / Lot 11, Block 2; Gore Creek Subdivision. Applicant. MQntogomery (Mike) Mathias Planner: Ailison flchs TABLED L9iNTIL. MAY 10, 1999 7. A request for a final review of a proposed lacker roorn expansion to the Dobson Ice Arena, lpcated at 321 E. LionsheacD CirclelLot 1, Block 1, Vaii Lianshead 2"d Filing. Rpplicant: Vail Recreatian District Planner: George auther TAE3LED UNlTIL MAl(1d, 1999 8. A request for a modification to a piatted buiiding envelope, iocated at 1047 Riva Glenl Lot 6, Spraddle Creek Estates. . Applicant. Franco D'Agastino, represented by Robert Mach Planner. A1lison Ochs TABLE[} UNTll. MAY 10,1999 9e A request #or a uar6ance from Section 12-6D-6, to allow for a building encroachment infio a rear setback, located at 2657 Arosa Drive 1 L.ot 8, Block D, Vai1 Ridgea ~ Appiicant: Town of Vaii Planner; Allison C3chs 7ABL EDlDNTiL MAY10, 1999 10. A request #or a variance from Seetidn 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) of the fiown of Vail Munic9pal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20% and a variance frvm Section 12-6D-6 (Froret Setbacks) of the Town of Vaii Municipal Code; to allow for an encroaehment into the front setback on a F'rimary/Secondary Residential zoned lot, #ocated at 362 Mi11 Greek Circ1e I l.ot 9, Blpck 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicante Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Arcnitects Planner: Aliison Ochs TABI.ED UNT1L IVfAY 10, 1999 11, Information Update ~ 1999 PEC rep, to the DRB - Apr. - Jun. - Jul. - Sep. - Oct. - Dec. - Jan. - Mar, O(} - ~ 1999 Al4'P Appointment - (Diane Goidert-1998) 1999 Open Space Committee (Galen Aasland - 1998) 2 ~ ~ 12, Approva1 of Aprif 12, 1999 minUtes. The applications and informat'ron about the proposals are availabie for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner°s ofifice located at the Tawn nf Vaii Communi#y Deveiopment Department, 75 Snuth F'rontage Road. Sign language interpretatiqn available upon request with 24 haur notification. Please cafl 479-2356, Tefepharte far the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Deuelopment Department Published April 23, 1998 in the Vaii Trail ~ ~ 3 F'LANNING AND ENVIRC?htMENTqL C4MMi5S10N ~ Pl3BLIG MEETING SCHEDULE Monday, April 26, 1999 FINAL AGENaA Proiect (9rien#ation 1 PEC IV"O LUNCH - Community Develapment Degartment Non+e ' MEMBEFiS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT John Schofield Galen Aasiand - Diane Golden Brian Doyon Tom Weber " Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill Site Visits ; None Driver: George _ ~ NC1TE: if the F'EC hearing extends untii 6:00 p.ma, the bcaard will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6;30 ' p.m, Public Hearing -'Town Council Chambers 2;00 p.ma 1. ;wearing in of new PEC members Chas Bernhardt and Doug Cahi(I and reappointed PEC member John Schofield - Lorelei Donaldson, Town Cierk. 2. Election vf 1999 Chair - John Schafieid Vice-Chair - Gaien AasCand (ChairNice-Chair terms expire 411/00) 3, A request for a final review of an amendment to Special Development District #30 (VAC), to allow for an addit9onal dwelling uni# and the reduction of accommodation units, loca#ed a# the Vai{ Athfetic Ciub, 352 E. Meadow DrivelParceis A & B, Vail Village First Filing. _ ApPlicant: JWT 1987 Limited Partnership, represented by John Perkins Planrter;Dominic MaurieiloIBrertt Wilson MC7Ti(JN: Brian Doyan SECQNd: Tom Weber VOTE: 7-0 RECC}Mt1AENb APPR4VAL, TO TOWN GOUNCIIL WITH 7 CC}NDITIONS: 1. That the prevr`ous site plan, landscape, and off-site improvement approvals continue to apply. ~ 2. That the Design Review Baard review and apprnve the proposed changes to the building. 6 /~P ~+4YA l~ , lV~11 V . 1 t 3. 1"hat the applicant deed restrict the 4, Type lli, Employee Hausing llnits in accordance with the 7'own Code prior to obtaining a temporary or fina9 certificate. of accupancy. ~ 4, The applicant sha11 be responsibie for ail of the public improvements of the original apprtival (including heating the sidewalk adjacent to property from ihe north side af the bridge to the front en#ry of the VAC building and provide stone veneer on the access to the parking structure, per the approved plans, etc.). 5. The appiicant shall provide and receive approval af acomplete set of engineered civil drawings for all public improvements prior to receiving a building permit for the project. 6. That the number oi AU's fal/ in the range between 46-48. 7. That the total square footage oi the four EHt!'s be not less than 1,149 sq, ft. - 1,300 sq. ft. 4. A request for a#inal review of an amendment to Special Deveitipment Dis#rict Nn. 4(Glen l.yon), revising the Glen Lyon Office Buiiding s6te (Area D), Iocated at 7000 S. Frontage Road 1Nest/Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision. . Applicant: Glen Lyon Ofifice Suiiding Partnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg Planner: Dominic Mauriello 'fABLED UN71L MAY 10y 1999 5. A request #or avariance #rortl Section 12m6D-6 of the Town of Vaii Murticipal Code, to ~ ailaw for an encroachment into the required sicle setbacks, loea#ed at 3003 Beliflower Drive / Lot 9, Block 6, Vail Interrrioun#ain. Applicant. Mr. Guillermo Huerta P1anner: George Ruther 7ABLED UNTIL MAY 10,1999 6. A request for a variance from 5ection i 2-6C-6, to allaw for the construction of a garage within a front setback and Section 12-10-8, to aliow for the construction of an undersized garage, located at 5125 Biack Bear Lane ! Lot 11, Block 2, Gare Creek Subdiuision. Appiicant: Moritogomery (Mike) Mathias Planner: Aliison bchs TASLED UM7tL. MAY 10,1999 7. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion to the Dobson ice Arena, Iocated a# 321 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Bltick 1, Vail L.ionshead 2"d Filing. Applicant: Vail Recrea#ian District Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNT1L MAY 10S 1999 ~ 2 r 8, ,4 request for a modi#6cation to a piatted building envelope, located at 1047 Riva Clen/ Lot 6, Spraddte Creek Estates. ~ Applicant; Franco D'Agostinog represerrted by Robert Mach Planrter: Allison t)chs TABLED UNT1L NIAY 10,1959 9. A request far a variance from Section 12-6D-6, to ailow for a building encroachrnent into a rear setback, loeated at 2657 Arosa Drive / Lot 8, Block D, Vail Ridge. Appiicant: Town of i1ai1 Planner: Ailison Ochs TABLED UNTIL MAY 1 0,1999 10. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allaw for site coverage in excess of 20% and a variance frarn Section 12-6D-6 (Front Setbacks) bf the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for an encraaehment into the front setback an a PrimarylSecandary Residential zoned {ot, located at 362 Miil Greek Circle 1 Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Waiter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Plartnerw Ailison C?chs TABL.ED UNTIL MAY 10, 1999 . ~ 11. Informatian Upda#e * 1999 PEC rep. to the DRB - Apr. - Jun. - Tom Weber Jul. - Sep. - Chas Bernhard# Oct. - Dec. - Gaien Aasland Jan. - Mar. QQ - 8oug Cahil! - ~ 1999 AIPP Appointment--(Diane Goiden-1998) • 1999 Open Space Committee - (Galen Aas{and -1998) 12, Approval of April 12; 19S9 minutes. The appiications and information about the proposais are available for public inspection during regular 4ffice hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Departmenfi, 75 5outh Fron#age Road. Sign language interpretatinn availabie upon request with 24 hour notification. Piease ca16479-2356, Telephcrne #or #he Hearing lmpaired, for information. Gommunity C3evelopment C?epartment ~ 3 ~ ~ MEMCIRANDUM u TC?: P(anning ar?d Environmenfal Commission FROM: Community Development C7epartment DATE: April 26, 1999 : SUBJECT. A reque .st for an amendment to Special Develop.ment District #30 (VAG), ta allow for an additional dwelling unit and reduction of accommadationunits,. loca#edat tI12 Vaf) Atll{etIC GIUb, 352 E. Meadow DrivelParcels A& B, Vail Vwllage First . Filing. Applicant: JWT 1987 Limited Partnership, represented by John Perkins John and Judy Angelo, represented by Ken Robertson and Larry Eskwith Planner: Dominic Mauriello 1. pESCRIPT10M ANL3 BACKGROUND dF THE REQUEST The Vail Athletic Club (JWT 1987 Limited Partnership), represented by Stan Cope and John f'erkins, has submitted a request #or a Malor Amendment to Special Develapment District {SdL}) #30 (as amended by 4rdinance No. 3, Series of 1998) to allaw fior a reduction in the nurnber of ~ accommodation units from 54 to 46 (or 48), an increase in the number of dwelling units from 3 to 4(new dwelling unit to contain one (ock-off unit}, and an increase in GRFA as shown in the table attached ta this memarandum. The changes are proposed due to fiinancing constraints (the need to have additional revenue from the sale of a dwelling unit) and also the desire to construct larger accommodation units which the applicant states are mare suitable for a first cfass boutique hotel. The applicant is asking for some flexibility in the exact number of accommodation units so that tinal des'rgn and costing can determine whether they pravide 46 AUs or 48 AUs (48 is the maximum number they can have based on parking requirements). Additionally; the awner of a condominium on the fifth floor (Angelo) is proposing to add a dormer and 713 sq, ft. of GRFA to their unit. This eondorninium awner is entitled to add this space and dormer under the in#erior conversion ordinance (Section 12-15-4) which was passed last year regardless of this SDD arnentlment, however, they have agreed to bring this request forward with the 11AG applieation sa that it can be viewed with the other improvements. Belaw is a summary of the changes (it should be noted that final hotel room design has nat been comp(eted and therefore there could be minor shifts in floar area to accommadate maid storage and other necessary cornmon area improvements): Common Area: There is a slight reduction in common area (52 sq. ft.) from the 1998 approval. AUs: The number of AUs is reduced to 46 units. T'he GRFA allacated to alfi AUs decreased approximately 10°l0 or 2,337 sq. ft. Most of ~ the existing accommodation units are approximately 300 sq. ft. 5ame new accommodatian units are praposed at 500+ sq, ft. F:\EVERYON E\PECtMEMC?S\99\VAC2. DOC *VAIL 1 TO{Yt!! ( - 4 DUsa The number of DUs is being increased by one unit (3 DUs to 4). ~ The new proposed unit is approximately 3,700 sq. #t. in area. The west condo now has a lock-off assnciated with it. EHUs. The number of EHUs remains the same at 4 units. The square faotage allocated is being reduced by 39 sq. ft. The sizes range from 220 sq, ft. to 350 sq. ft. Parking: , The proposal reduces the demand far parking by 2 parking spaces (from 22 to 20 spaces). The applicant still proposes 22 spaces on- " site. TNe proposed changes to the buiiding do nat result in an amended footprint or modifications to the site plan. The previpusly approved site plan and canditians of approval are proposed #o be carried forward. Tne building elevations are modifiied by the addition of several dormers on the sc~uth and north elevations of the buifciing and the encfiosure of areas that were previc~usly ~balconies. The DRB wiN be required #o review these changes to the building. Overa11 the changes are minor in terms of bulk and mass or irnpacts on adjacent properties. The proposed building continues to meet the definition of a Itsdge with 64% of the GRFA devoted to accammodation units and 36°lo devoted to dwetl'sng units {includes l:ock-o#f}. Reductions o# the proposed floor plans are attached. In 1998 #he applicant received approval to eliminate one dweliing unit and one accommodatinn unit and make ather interior and exterior changes ta the building. See the attached spreadsheets far additional history on approvals. ~ 11, STAFF RECC}MMENDATlUN The Gommun'sty Development Department recammends approval of the propased amendments subject to the following finding; That the prvpased major amendment to Special aevetopment District #30 (Vail Athletic Club) comp/ies with fhe nine design criteria outlin2d in Section 12-9A-8 of the Town - Code. Additionaliy, the appticant has demansfrated tv the satisfactian of the Commission that any adverse effects of the requested deviation from the deve/apment standards of tne undertying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided. The recammendatian of approval is alsa subject to the following canditions: 1. That the previous site pian, landscape, and of#-site improvement approvals continue to apply. 2. That the Design Review Board review and apprave the praposed changes to the buiiding. 3, 7hat the applieant deed restrict the 4, Type IIl, Empioyee Housing Units in aCCOrdance with the Town Code prior to obtaining a temporary or final certificate of occupar?cy. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for a{i of the public improvements of the originai ~ approval {including heating the sidewalk adjacent to property from the narth side F:\EVERYONE\PEC\MEMOS\991VAC2. DOG 2 ~ of #he bridge to the frant entry of the VAC building and prpvide stone veneer on the access ta the parking structure, per the approved plans, etc.). 5. The applicant shal( provide and receive approval of a complete set of engineered civii drawings for all pub]ic improvements prior to receiving a building permit for the praject. III. ZC7NING ANALYSIS This anafysis shaws the comparison af the current proposed amendmen# w'rth the underlying . zoning. See affached spreadsheet for cornparison with 1993 -1998 amendments. ltalics denotes no change from previous approvats. Underiying Zoning, Public Accommadation (PA) Lot Area: 30,486 sq. ft. S#andard PA Zoninq 1999 Praposai GRF'A: 24,3$$ Sq. ft. ($0%) 36,492 Sq. ft. (i11Glt:ld2S 713 Sq. #t. interior conversinn by separate app.) Density: 25 DUs per acre 28.33 QUs (AUs are 0.5 of a Du or 17.5 DUs (46 - 48 AUS, 4 C7Us, & 4 EH[JS) and EH U's are 4.333 ~ of a DU} Landscape area: 9,145 sq. ft. (rrrin) 9,730 sq. ft. (N1C) Site Coverage: 16,767 sq. it. 29,350 sq. ft. (IV1C) Parking. 20 spaces 22 spaces (NlC) (per 7977 variance) Bufldr`ng height: 48' 67 South, 59' tllorth (NIC) VI. AMENbMENT PROCEDURE The prapased changes described in Section t are considered to be Major Amendments to the 1993 approved SDD and subsequent amendmen#s. As stated in the Zaning Gode Section 12- 9A-2, a major amendment is ciefined as failaws: "Any proposal to change uses; increase gross residential filaor area; change the number af dweliing or accammodatipn units; modify, enlarge or expand any approved Speciai Develflpment District. . Since the appl'rcant's proposed amendments to the SDC} invofve changes to gross residential floor area, as well as density (number af units), the proposal is required to follow the Majar SDD Amendment pracedure. The PEC shall provide a recammendation to the Town Council ~ regarding the proposal. The town Council rnay approve the praposal via two readings-of an F:\EVERYONE\PEC\tNEMOS\99\VAC2: DQC 3 ~ oCdinance. ~ IV. SPECIAL DEVEL{?PMENT D15TRICT GRIYERtA _ As provided for in Section 12-9A-8 of the Tawn Gode, there are nine SDD review criteria which are to be used to evaluate the merits of a proposed Major 5DD Amendment. lt shoutd be nated that the staf# analysis ot the project's campliance with the SDD review criteria has only focused on the proposed amendments to the SDfl, and not on the balance ot the 1993 ot -1996 approvais. The review criteria, and the staff's analysis af the proposal's compliance with . . the review criteria> are as follows A. t?esign compatibility and senstitivity to the immediate environment, neyghbarhood and adjacent properties retative to architectural design, scaiea butk, buildirtg height, buffer zones,'identity, character, visual integri#y and arienta#ian. Minirnal architectural changes are proposed to the design of the building. The overall scale, and mass and buik of the proposed struc#ure will generally rernain as it was approved in 1993 and subsequently amended. The primary roof forms (and building height) will also remain as approved in 1993, with the acldition ot several dormers. Staff does nat believe these changes wiH significantly af#ect the bulk and scale o# the bui[ding. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a cQmpatible, efficient and workable relatic?nship with surrounding uses and activity. ~ The general uses within the redevelaped Vail Athfetic Glub (VAC) are not proposed to change. The building continues to meet the definition of a lodge as more than 50% of the GRFA is devoted to accommodation units. 7he floor area additions are re(atively minor with respect to the overall scape of the project with an increase ot approximately 2.62°Io from the 1998 approval or 4.91 °lo over the 1993 approval. C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlineci in Title 12, Chapter 1fl. Staff believes that the proposed amendments to the SDD are in compliance with this criteria. The Town's zoning requiremen# is for a total ofi 20 parking spaces to be provided on the site, which is based on the reduction in the number of accommodation units and the addition of a new dwelling unit. This proposal woufd reduce the number of required parking spaces from 22 to 20, however, the applicant is propasing ta accommodate 22 parking spaces on-s+te. D. Conformity with appticabie etements of the Vail Comprehensive P1an, Town policies and tJrban Design Pians. VAIL LAN[3 USE PLAN The goals contained in the Vail Land Use Plan are fia be used as the Town'spolicy guidelines during the review process for rrew or amended development proposals. The ~ staff considered the foifowing Land Use Plan Goals/Policies during the initial review of the F:\EVERYON E\P EC\MEM05\991VAC2, DQC 4 1993 SDD establishment for the Vail Athletic Club, and further, sta#f believes that these _ ~ goals and policies continue ta be applicable with regard ta the current Major 5C3D Amendment proposal: 1.1 Vail shouid cantinue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a ' ~ balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitar' and the permanent resident. 1.,3 The quality of deye4opment should be maintained and upgraded whenever posslble. 3~3 Hateis are imporCant to the continued success of the ToWn of Vail, therefore conversion to condominiums shou(d be discouraged. 4.2 Increased density in the core areas is acceptable so lorrg as the existing character of eaeh area is preserved ihraugh implernentatian of the Urban C3esign {;uide Plan and the Vaii Viftiage Master Pfan. 4.3 The ambiance of the Village is important to the identity of Vail and sh4uld be preserved. (Scale, alpine character, srnail town feeling, mauntains, natural setting, intimate size, casmopoiitan fee(ing, environrnental quality.} Staff believes that the proposed Major SdD Amendment appiication meets the gaals and po4icies af the Land Use P1an as cieseribed above. ~ VAlL VILLAGE MA5TER PLAN The stafif believes that the 1993 approval for the redevelopment of the Vail Athletie Club carriedout many of the goals and objectives containedin theVail Village Master Plan. Additionally, the staf# believes that the current Major SDD Amendment proposal also fiurthers the failowing Master Plan's gaals and abjectives: - Goa{ #1 -Encaurage high quaiity redevelapment while preserving the unique architectural sca4e of the Village in arder to sustain its sense of community and itientity. . C7b{ective 1.2 -Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residerttlal artd commercial #acilities. Goal #2 - To foster astrong tourist industry and promote year-round economic health and viability far the Viilage and for the cammunity as a whole. Obiective 2.3 - lncrease the number of residential units available for shart term overnight accommodations. Pollcv 2.3.1 - The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that are develnped above existing density Ievels are required to be designed or managed in_a rnanner that makes them available for short term overnight rental. ~ Obiective 2.5 - Encourage the continUed upgrading, renovation and maintenance F:\EVERYONE\PEGIMENI0S\99\VAC2. DOC 5 of existing [adgir?g and commerciaf faei4ities to better serve the needs of our ~ guests. Goal #5 - Increase and improve the capacity, effic+ency, and aesthetics of the transportation and circulatian system thraughout the Village. Pallcy 5.1.5 - Redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged to provide underground ar visually concealed parking. The staff be4ieves #hat the proposed Major 5DD Amendment application meets the Vaif _ Village Master Pian goaRs, obyective5, and policies as described above. . E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or gealogic hazards fhat affect the property on which the speciai deveiapment distric# is proposed. AI#hough this praject is located adjacent to Gore Creek, no portion of the proposal encroaches into the fifty faot stream setback, nor in#o the 100-year floodplain. There are no other natural andior geoiogic hazards that affect the property. F. Site plan, building design and loca#ian and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sen,sitive to na#urai features, uegetation and overa(1 aesthetic quality of the commur?ity. Although this criteria was discussed extensively during the 1993 review, staff believes that the praposed Major SDD Amendment will have no negative impacts on this criteria. G. A circulation system designed for bath vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and ~ off-site trafific circulation. The staf# be{'?eves that the proposed Major SDD Amendment wilf have no impacts on this criteria. H. Functionai and aesthe#ic landscaping and oper~ space in c~rder ta ap#imsze and ~ preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. Again; the staff believes that the praposed Major SDD Rmendment wif1have no impacts on tnis criteria. 1. Phasang plan ar subdivision pian that wiil maintain a workable, functional and efficient retationship throughnut the development of the special development district. Phase 1 of the VAC redevelapment has been completed (C1ub Levels - lawest two floors). The balance af the redeveiopment is considered F'hase !l. ~ F:\EVERYONE\P EC\MEMOS\99\VAC2. DOC 6 VAIL ATHLETIC CLklB MAJOR SD[? AMENDMElVT -1959 1993 1996 1997 1998 1988 Percent Percent Approved Rpproved Approved Approved Propased Ghange Change tand Use Totais Totaris Tatafs Totafs 7atals from 1993 from 1998 AU GRFA: 24,687 24,898 25,063 25,008 22,671 -&.89°fo -1Q.31% CIUGRFA: 6,252 8,312 8,125 8,070 12,672 50.66% 36.32°f ENUGRFA: 1,383 1,295 1,207 1,188 1,149 -20.37% -3.390f. Cammon Area: 14,265 15,054 15,563 15,945 15,893 1024% -0.33°!a Confererrce: 2,727 1,545 1,500 1,330 1,330 -105.04°f 6.04°/ Restauranf. 3,285 3,268 3,403 3,562 3,562 7.78% O.Ob°!o Club: 20,881 21,609 21,609 21,499 21,499 2.57% O.q(}°/Q Garage: 5,512 4,780 4,868 4.236 4,296 -28.31% 0.00°f Grand 7otat: 78,992 80,761 81,0-28 80,898 83,072 4.91°/ 2.62°f ' 1993 1896 1997 1998 1999 Approved Appraved Appraved Approved Froposed tlnits Tatals Totals Totals Totafs Tatals # of AU`s 52 55 55 54 46 # af DU"s 9 4 4 3 4 # of EHU's 4 4 4 4 4 Develoment 1893 1896 1998 1999 Standard Pk Zanin Exis#in Approval Approva! Appraval Propasal Density 25 du's peracee 24.33 du"s 30.33 c#u's 32.83 du's 31.33 du's 28.33du's or 17.5 du's (dertsiTy calc.) (tfensiiy cafc.) (densily eafc.) (density eafe.) (density calc.) (AU's ara6.5 ot a. QU and EHU's ere 0.333 oFe DU) GRFA 24,388 s. ft. 20,361 s, ft. 32,282 s. fl. 34,505 s. ft. 34,266 s. ft. 36,492 s. ft. NOtG'S` - 1998 Propased square footage figures were cafcufated fram a new and eomplete set of Vaif Athle3'sc Club pfans at a seale af ane-eighth inch equats onefoot. - A precise comparisan wkth 1995 and 1997 figures is noi feasible due to differences in previous plarzs' architectural scafes, digitizing operatc5rs, and blue print reprodueS{an tmages. - 7he 1898 prnposaE incfudes a nei iotal af 62 square feet of acldltional €(oor area tha# is iacated on ihe Fourth and Fifth Ffoars. Tkte GRFA figures EnckuBe ihe 713 sq. ft. af CaRFA proposed by separate applicant as an interiar converston. . f:ievetyone\pec\memasl39\Vac99 4/23r99 ` Val"l Athletl"c Club Locati"on Map : SU b) G'Ct P' 1"tJ pE; fty : , . . VAIL VIL.LAGE FILIN 1 ' PAliEC1M ('.n LOT 7RACT B & C 41 VA1L VIL.LAGE FIL1RIG ' EASfi MEADOW DR -rYRO CaNaO ;TRIA HAus 400 I MC1t3M'AEN HAUS ~ CORNlCE ~ ~ CONDt? 362 g 292 ~ ~ ~ G '!'FtAC1' B & C E D aA y E B 18 211 3 4 5 f CDW USF 5 18 6 H~~~~--1 G E ! /'~2 3+ 3 B 17 -C ~ g ~ ~ G ~ 4 6 s 7 ~ a/g 13 1 6 t ~ ~G) 4 ~ q ~ r~t ~-"E~u~z-r 1 F 1 cONoO• ~ K s CK AC E ~ i 302 , VILLA V~.PiALLA 365 2 F ' GC7~Vd0 ALL SEASQt~ ` i zior~s ~ ~ 360~,S ~ coNac~ t orv K GFiR(BTIANA HC7F2N Lf3D,t`.~,E a AT VAlL - - TiVC?L3 CC7N[7Q Produced by the Gammunity Development Department . ~f ~ f~ k~,_`m r 1.~#lh~,qST ~y~ ~ r j L3 , tl 'y a - ~ ~ / • 1 Rift trt ki ' ` f ~ m IC fan~nm N tab kwa~c+c . '4 a ,>i, ~ ~ ~ ~.i ~ - - ~ . NRF MINHi[ MRt iSCtlIC ~ ~ ~ 1d ' F ( f ' ~MSUtt la nwmt nU. au` - , ~ ~ _ '"T^--f ~ 5? ~ r~~c w~a r+x~ t ~ ~ C ( 1 t ~ - [ ( t ~ ' ~ "4 Q ~ 1 • + . .k ~y. ~ . ~R` 'tlY y t ~ ' Q' ~ - ~ ~ ! ~$i ~ ~ [ { I C%ISi1NG \ fi { c. i ' ~ ` p t t ~ 7 ! E ~ ; W - - ° - `t-~ 'j. . ~ . i . Y . . N¢WMCK ' ~ ~ ! /E : : ~ i ~'•1 1pgWa"~\\'- \ ~i '4 ~ R~M ~3 q'S.~/• F ' SPF ~ R ~ wH ndocN . . . X"`~ . . ..,-^'----~-~y` ~i. w1E wa. ~tl. t4es pho ~ ~ - - - - a. f SD, I . WE ^ f6Nti0t/: . ~ fiC~1iKNC~~ z 9/ ~ tA { p/ 9p 9 f0 tY lY IS ~ i i . . . ~ . .-1 ~ - . . . , .ca C~7 : ~ _ ~ ; ~ ; ~ p~ A . _ r : ~ k{ ~ k i i , { ~ " ~ . F.. . . _ {r . . . .~7.. ._.._.~.(f . . rC . ' ' _ _ . _ . ~ Q ~ tC ~ t 1 . O „ . . . ~ . l . . _ ~ 7__ - ~ ~ , ,_t._. r ~ ' ~ x ~ . _ . . ' ~ , t! f( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i . , . ..T.._. t ( t ~ ! ; . : . : ~ ; ~ . ~ i i . . . - i - • , : . ~ ; _ . i ' ~ . ~ _ . . . , x ' ' ' _ . • , . . LJ ~ ~ : . , . . . . • ' ^ ~ _ . _ . . . - ~ ~ .r! ( . : ; ~x s ~ - - - _ - _ ' ~ : ~ . . • ~ t : ~ , ( . . . - - ~ . q _ t _ ~ . _ . . _ . ' . ~ , t i ~ ~ , ~ _ 9 . ~ . ; - . n 1. a a~¢: c +ss3 . , wi. r ~ t------ ___-__.:____--i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x¢ a g= ~ or: s » ' AI . A ~ q scd. ~i r. _ ~ Hf?:ik4t16 , " - " ' ' . . . , . . . , ' _ _ . . . , . . a, ~ : - - - - - . . ~ . ~ . _ . , . , . , , k Q ~c 16 € Y ~ ' ~.r~/~, it 12 17 D ~ ~ t • , . t q_ ' , _ . _ _ . . ~ , 4! ~y i , . , ~ , u~' : _ . , g _ 1. _ _ . . . . . . _ _ - j F _ f _ . _ . . _ _ . . j _ . _ _ . . ~ EL ~ 1 ~ , t 4 ~ ~ ' 1 I ~ I { , . . . . ~ . ~ . . . . . . ~ ~ . ~ . ~ . ( 1 t - ` s ! , ~ ~ ~ EL~J3~~ ~ xe _ ~ . ;(D E~ ~ e ~ (Q . . . - ...I. ~ . . . ~ , ~ . - ' ~ r . . . _ ~ . , ~ - ' , , _ ~ . _ O , ~ ~.I ' . i ~ ; Y ~ {fRF~WNE roSntR~~ ~ ` . . 4 , V ' . _ _ _ , _ . s ~ ~ -~k... . . . , _ _ _ . _ f. . _ . , ' ' • . ,i E i i ~ r . ~ .W.~... . . F ~ , - , _ CO _ : ~ ' F i F ~ Loww ~~h ~ t flxV ~ scw . Ve . r•.w` " I(. tawER 4 f~p . o. . _ .T.~ uut . . . . . _ . . . . . . ~ I , . - . ' ~ ~ 6d~; ~ C3ktWC4 f kTW5q11S t AL Tx (D ~t (7 `-r ~ (T~k 8 6k 10 i . r rr +i rs ! i r ~ qr ~ _ y ~ . rs.,c s.a wn ac nc ~ r t • ~ ~o f ~ ~ . . . _ ! . . _ _ . _ . C' : r ' ~Y _ i _ ~ ~ . , F" . . 4 ..1._ _ . . _ _ ~ ~ . i '4 ~ ; , F - - . , . E C? . . ~ ~ r ~ + . . . - . ~ ~ - - - , ~ t ~ ~ . F ~ ~t.\.•v..~ . . f s?.i" ._,yy.. F, _ ~ .j:l. t.~._. . ti : . ~ ' . . . ; . i ~ ; : . t . : 8} (A}#_ . . ` ~ • i._ . > F._ . . . . . { . _ . " ' ' _ " f t ~ WI 4w S8, i49S F v - i o F . . . . . ~ . ` .j . _ . . .~r . sf 1"_~ _ . . 4 . . ~ ' O(: A y.:! . . . . . l I~ ~ . 3 ~y~~ag -G P~u- - - - y((,t~l. I ~ ° f FC AN . . . _ . ~ . _ . . . _ . _ _ ' ' _ . : . . . . . . . -'~'r ! . _ . . ~ ~ ~ 1............ _ . . . ~ e ! ~ . . . . . . . . _ . . _ . ~ ~ ~ Nrtr ~ r cu~mFCS: ~ a ~ 8 ~ ~T tt 3~ L:J lJ na.xtir^ 8 (..1 e y~ Itr 1~ tz t] ~ i , . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ _ . . . ~.i... . . ; i M 4~ ' ~ ~a. t-.~_... . _ _ . r . . ~ .F . ~ F . . _ _ ! ( ~ _ . ' ' ~ • . ~ . . I f . . . . _ M ~ ~ t r~ +sC ; ~ _ ~ . . . f ~~~l~, . 4 . . . _ . . _ . . _ _ . _ _ ~ o . . . ~ . . t . 1 ~ . . E a.(Z,~ ft~ _ p + t ~ ' ~ . _-•r- "''J~ ~ t 1 . ! ~ . # r~ , ~ ~ r t ~ ` E t l } ; ' t..j_.. . ~ . _ _ _ ~F o91E Au ~ , . ; . . MtIY I~Y #r{Jy f " I. . . . . , ~ ~ . ~ : : ~ 4p , ~ t . L i SKprM , II ; wr.~d~. f ~x # x. • v . , ,~.~1 . ~ _ J . . „ _ n,. F . t • G ._."7 ~`~1... ~ I Y I - _ F [ ~ L y ,E . ~ r 7 , ~ . x ~ . . ~ t f ~f - _ . Qi , _ ~ _ _ . . _ . . Or+nmr inar-,.~a ~ . -.p_ _ . . , ~ ~ 1 % ~t ~ Cri€fYFt~. ~ y. ~ . ~ t ' ~ - . . " . t F , _ , r _ , . . . _ a ,y . . . . _ . _ . . . . . . . • ~ - , ` ~ F ; 1 : ~ f ~ utt€~ u. t6, ) . ~ ~ ' - ~ . fM....- 3 , AI.2 ~x w a'. "_o- ~ - - , . . E :trow ' rteNM+ . _ . . . , . . . ' _ ' . ~ . . . . . . - . _...-r . . _ . . j fIXR2h.'I. PlWVM~S t ~ i ~ C Ce lQ 0 c` ~ "Y Q ~ ~ ~l 4' U Q ~k Q OA ~3 . IU U IT fJ ' r~> ' _ ~ . . . ' . . . . _~y ,1 ~`...n ~ xmeH• . ~ ~ na ~ uw u k w~r . . . ~ ___"_i. . ~ i I f • . ~ . ~ ' ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . f.. . _ . . I, K j - G- Yt€iiE AU ' ~ T964 ktt , _LN . . ; . . 4 . . , . . .r _ _ _ f ~ 8 R g , ~ a . r . _ . . ~ . o ~ , • ; ~ I E16~Y6'cYi CO'j ~ 4} : L , r , ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ " - . _ _ .L ~ . . _ _ ~ t. . " _ _ _ . g . f. .y.~_ j . " ~ .M I. , k , f . ~ Bi ~ . ~ .i. . _ y.. _ , _ _ _ . _ . - ~ ' - c o: g s . . _.s . _ . ~ : . . ~ . . _ _ , ~ . . . . . ~ n. . Unit: Ua~ tH. I434, E:- I N0: 8. I A'lr 3 ~ ~ ~ . . . . : , . . _ w, . _ - ' _ . . . . . _ . . . _ ...~f 4 ~ ' ~ . ~ 1 ,o , (~a~ (~t ea m n ~ E ~ r~nrURSCt. r~~n~ : . ~ : ~ - - f _ L1 1 ? . i ruuol~,.~ r ~ N ~ Ayi~eto ! ~ ~ cG b f , ~ , , ~ i ~ ~ : N4 App , / rti tt~ ~ G`t`~ ~O o o G°j~t c ~ p,~ i fA 2 2 I ]15.Y 1/1" ~ [ { f j - ~ ~ ~ I } t 1 rfi i ~ f n~'/f t oG~cc1 . , ~ ! E ~ , . € 4 ' , i. k ~ ' i s- - - f - _ - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - % " ~ ~t Tvm ldlf ~ - - ~ . _ ~ ; - - - _ - - ~ ~ C w ~ WT M F ` e , t ! 1~ Fi i DRnwtt Ie rxn ! CMtlt: : CW ~J ~ Dp,k Ma 48. 1444 ~ r L ~ ~ e ~ Alf ~ r4 ~ g'f ~svFn 5._a. . foUwFl.~StpM ~i _ . . , . - t v~~..._...___.n..~ . _ ......_,.._.....~__V.~_.~_.._....:_._.__~._..:___._~."_"_~ ' _ . .__..~___.,_._.._:~~.v._.~.~.. _ ~3 ~nsaa T TT T T t ~ ~ t 1 4 t 1 ! f ~i I fI ~ I I o F I t f ~ r7 4C3 ~ rtm ccwm`cr: ~ ~ rY iC ~ ~ tA ~ 1A I ~ ~ ?A A Sl ~'`~~4 t6 ~+r». ~~it~~•~~ { IS ( F ..i..~i Y v f 1 4 1 F t ( i t ! 1 f ! { 1J t ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ . i ~ 4 • ~ ~ . '~u~ : i ~ e o a ` Q o ~ ~ I 1 F t i ~ ~ ( 1 PRAM'fF: o c p CHECNED: n ( ~ k I f 0.t1E: fW 19. 14!x ~ . . . . . . . . ~ ~ . U: t ~ . . . . 1 k . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I i I___ l------------- ~ ~I~~~~u < < • Q u.. < . ~ ~ ~ , T. T 'P T T ~ C(kitk:ti: E l } L i t t I{{ E . P~1ci~ - a I 4 i~ ~ t f ~ tB (U I ! f_ I f I I ~ p ~ /1.Seai.: t/6•.~f• 0• . - r ~ 43 t7 ~1~~ T T T T T T T T T T ~ ~ ' ~ i . 1 (M.+~~~~ • ~ ~ E t 3~q-. ~ I ~ [ i t 7 ' auwk: u,a~. trtecKeo: . . ~ EB I ~m m~ WFE; Fe4 79. 4? ~ I . . . -V ' • : M'Y Y.~ . . . ~ . . ~ 6E: ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ '.7 AL /'/y. ~ Jm ~~~4~11YJ(tp ~ ~ Soal~ : T(5. ~ ~,~Q• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~%~kG'~N ltfVklk~kS MEnsaRaNDuM TC?: Vaii Town Councii ~ FROM: Community Deve{opment department DATE: September 30, 1993 5UBJECT: R"uest for the estabtishment of a Specia! Devetopmen# District to allow the expansion af fhe Vaii Athletic G1ub loca#ed at 352 East Meadow , Drive. ~ A.ppticant: Vail Athietic Club ' Planner: Sheily Melio • w..v.,-•.~.,:.... ..,ti ,t.r.,..~.,;..,:ve::...xz...r,y.,.,r,,.~.s;.,.s..~......;h«.....ti, :;~....'i;?':;a;~.:`.;::;~:.,•;;~•~:c t1,..;.~..;,.,:;.,.,.,.~:..,...>~;..~...y•,,.,:,.;.;...~.;..;..:;.,tE,.t,.•...:.;.<.r.•.._,.,>..:.,,..,.n.. , ....~,,,....y,::.~a>...,.~~. " , ,4. Kfi : :A... . 5..-..,.,,.,. ....,...:_..,..,.,,.ti., . . ,...•:.•:.....a3. ...:1........,.... . . .4~a;;.,. ,,,,:..?..,~:3 . ..~..a.~:~.ti~+:a.~z v.. , l....... ,..,x.:::......,_. ..t..: :,~v...._.. .r.... .....i?...:. . aa~. ..t..:.As,.x..._._ ......_.ti .....o..........._....,_,................. ..b.~. .....r...,.........~ti ~ ....v...,....a..:.:•....... ..~::e-.::~ . , •:y::::.-.:x:•;~:>:...:..:,.. _.;,:::.;..v;..~a~:. ••.~~..,.:.;t~... . ......s . ..................n~...~.. ...1.....~ ..r .....1...... ...t . v: , . .......r . c.4.;ti:;`•:3nvh.i~°,=:?"~>"`{:3:}':ti3::~ti!=i~:i; ,\•.~•,:~,.y .:tY.. .;h ..4v:~• ..1 . . \:~M.~ . ?...i:..::.::._•'~i::.::.:::.v.~ ......::,.}'.•:.:i:.r:~-.~.:. 1i~.4t. ' v:\': •:ti•xt'ti•:uv\\\ '?:y . ............+n..v.~.:.:::.........n...~.{.}:.::.~...... •xi:...uaR~-iY........x,:•.:.,}.::ti_`::i:....vh. '..','•'iJ' .~~:.va:e' ~ ...i• .4ev.` •:+y:.;..iii:>ti~" a4 :p~?:.;;.:..~~.:...... :{t.. . .v .v. . . .~....:v; . . ..:::n...,.................. ,.......v...... ~ ' 2i~~~'•:~v.~.~:::._~. ~v~.y::~~u'} ' ~ . . . . . u.~..:: • .v .....n.~..>.,. ..~ti~.~ ~ ..l.v..:..i,...w.•:? :'~n•.•..:::....+...~. ti..~.:lj:_}.?~:~\.:: r... . ..S.... . 1 4'1''i': -.:::~%~::i::;:~l,~i::n; r...........~..:.:.::v ....................:.::..~..::n~.................~,........... ..x.,t..v..,.,..:........,,.;.. ~ t,..~:.,y•v.i'~-Y.•~.v~:. + 0. i U.?' v\h~:ii+:u:Y+Y 1d'tix:~2~w : +'4:: ~'1..'~"tl.+~ i'~~J`~ ~+:•:S{~•~w •:.5.. V _'AVT..\4...~:v {a~ '~.~:.a\~. .............:...z..:..:n~. i~-.vh~:. •::.:t.::....a....~~..:: :tv~::::,;.v: •.r;.~:•:i'~:~:tii'::n> ':i:::`:'.:v::.~.k 2 ..aa... ~v.Y2.V~':i::2:1?:i'i:i:3K.4'k+.\~".i~. . .....~.\.5... »a•:o:.x;:,.x.:a,.,.....,,...,..:` .:......:..:...:.x;;.....,,.:,..,,,.. ,...t.: at.....a...>~.,,.-.~....?:C:'~..............,.x\ . : On September 27, 1993,-the Planriing and Envirvnmental Commission (PEC) reviewed a request #rom #he owners of #he Vaifi Athfetic Club for the establishment a# a Special Development District. This meeting was the final headng after a series o# three worksessions with the PEG anci Design Review Board (DRB) beginning in June of this year. Attached please #incf a copy of staff's memnrandum dated Septernber 27, 1993 regarding the detaits ofi the appGcant's rec{uest. The PEG voted unanirnously to approve tt7e praject with JefE Bowen making the mo#ion and ~ Daltdn Wii(iams seconding the motionn ln additics'n to the staff's conditians which required theft3(Iowing. 1. The applicant permanen#iy restrict the prapased 52 ALls as shart-term rental units and that the 52 AUs shall no# be subdivided in the future to ailow for individual ownership. The Condominium Declarations shall be amended to inciude this point before an occupancy permit will be released #or the project. 2. The aapiicant provide one 1 bedraom and.one 2 bedroom empJoyeehousing . -uni# and_ restrict them per the Tawn of Vai! Employee NQUSing OrdinaRCe. The empioyee housing restriction agreement shall be signed-and submitted to the sta#f for appraval befare a building permit wiil be refeased for the project. 'fhe proposed employee units shall provide housing #or a#otal ofi 6 employees. The units shall meet the minimum standards specifieci in the Town of 1/ail's Emp(oyee Housing C7rdinance. Further, the PEC recammended the fo!lowing condstions: 1. That #hree of the parking spaces currently being proposed an the si#e for the incremental increase in required parking shall be removeti and the applicant shall pay info the parking fund for these three spaces ($8,000 per space =$24,000). With this pravision, the app(icant shall remove the two exteriar parkirig spaces adjacent to the structure entry and this area shall be designated 1 ~ r for lo~~.ng and delivery. An additional space within the interior af the parking structure shall aiso be removed from the proposal. This cond'rtion was due #o ~ the PEC's cancem with the ability o# the parlcing structut`e to function wrth twenty-seven interiar valet parking spaces. 2. That the applicant work with the DRB to develop a landscape plan on the sauth side of the building between the building and the streamwalk with the goal of returning this area to a more. naturai candition. This work 'rncluties improving and aliowing pubEic access through the property via the existing bridge and path : on the sauthwest carner ofi the building and remQVing the:existing sad and reseeding the area wsth a riaturtal grass seed mix and possibly adding'additional planting. The area to be returned to anaturai condition begins just south af the wiilaws adjacent to the VAG and extends snuth to the streamwalk. 3. That the I7RB review the architectural details af the huilding further to insure that there is adequate archi#ectural refief in the window mullionsi trim, etc. 4. That the applicant work with the DRB to improve the signage, landscaping and general ofi East Meadow C3rive as it intersects w"rth 81ue Gow Chute particulariy the north side o# East Nleadow Drfve. The objective af this e#fort is ta no# anty to improve the pedestrian character of this area, but to aisa deter unnecessary vehicular traffic frqm enfering East Meadow Drive. ~ c:tsheilyl+nemos\vac,930 ~ 2 • MEiVIORANUUM ~ TO: Planning Envsronmenta! Gamrnission . FROIV4. Communr#y Qewelopment Departmen# DATE: September 27, 7993 (Corre.ctions made September 27, 1993 are in botd.) SUBJECT: A request for the estabiistiment of a Special Deveiagment District ta atlow the. : . expansion o# the Vai1 Athietic.Club, locateci at 352 East Meadow Br'rve, "and more specificaliy descsibed as follows: A parcel of iand in Tract B. Vaii Village, First Fting, Town of Vail, Eagle Gounty. Calorada, mcsre particufarly described as foilows: Cammerrcing at the Ndrtheast comet of said Traci B; thence N 79046'00" W along the Noriherly tine of Vaii Vifiage, First Fiiing, and along the Narthes4y Gne of said Tract 8 622$6 feet; tfsence S 06026'52" W a disiance of 34$.83 feet to the Sauthrvest corner of that parcel of land described in Bcsok 191 at Page 139 as recarded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagie Couniy Reccsrds, said carner also being the True Point of Beginning; thenae S 79004'08" E and a{ong ihe Southerly line of said parce12U0.Ot} feei to the Southeasi corner thereof; thence N 62052'00" E and ainng the Nartherly line of that parcel of land described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recotded in 1971 in the Eagle County Records, a drstance of 66.78 feei to the Northeasterly . corner of said parcet of land; said comer being on the Wester(y right-of-way fine of Gore Greek Road, as piatied in Vail ViIlage, Fifth Fiiing; ihenae N 27°13'37" W a distance of 77.37 feet along sa'sd Westerly right-of-way iine of Gore Greek Road; thence N 89°29'22" W a distance o€ 12.80 feet ~ io ihe Northeasteriy comer of zhat parcel of land described in &aok 191. Page 739 as recorded .lanuary 10, 1966 and fiied in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; ihence Northwesterly 28.51 feet along the arc of a 37.50 feet radius cun+e to the left having a cerrtral angle of 40°30't?0" wtrose cnord beats N 53°40`QO" W a distance of 25.96 feet to a point of tangency: thertce N 73055'00" W and atang said tangent 166.44 feei; thersce N 85074'21" W a distarrce of 50.40 feet to the Narthwesterly comer of the Mountain Haus Parcef; thence S 02018'00" W and along the easterly line of said Mountain Naus Parcel a distanae of 1.00.00 teet to the Southeasierly carner thereaf, thence S 45°13'53" E a distance of 38.70 feet to the True Paini of Beginning, cantaining 30,486 square Seet, more or fess. Appltcant: Vail AthlettC Club Plariner. She!(y Me(!o ,•;:•,y~, ,tiv \;:{i{`,?h,.'?;}.~^ Si.~?^ ni'~ . -:r:..t:•:vr.vn:...v..ax•.::,v-:..av. ..}Na,. ..,a~a.~,t.a:_v.q};v:i . .........................r..._..:.ti:v....x:::s..r.v.w+•s:.:c;r:.::::::v:.:... v1.t.....,.v..............:,:::,.}}?:i•*'3::•'.......?...\\..v.....:+>.vn•,.,_,y:y.`.v;; .n.iii' . ?.},pi;.,:4;`::nt,:.;.; : ::;~::.....y.•Y.........:.,..,.n....,. r..... . a.:~..;;t '.:;4:: ...-..,....:•.::....::...•:..::;.a:.:::.~;•...... ...<.:..:..v..•::.:.:.:::.;...:«-::.:r:n:.. . . . . ............n.: :.:::.v.::::.v\:.~ :.:.•.i!.i}......;..u:: ? .a:.:a:....r,:. `.`•'•i`:~%::~i?i~ ~ti:'i1v: ' w J.v.,V.w2h' r.tii'ii' ? . iiiti'.ti:%ii~;iJ'•:Gti4i`~:''. {\~~~:4\:A t . ~ . . tii;;:::.... .......-.,....,.:a::iot :~<$~f...x.w..............v..,...............x.. PROJECT C}VERVIEW . The appiicanf is requesting a review of the proposed establishment of a Special Development District (SDD) for the redeveloprneni of the Vail Athietic Club iacated at 352 East Meadow Drive. The Vail Athletic Club is located on the southwest corner a# VMI Valtey t?rive and Eas# Meadow Drive ai the botiom of Blue Cow Chute. The property is currentiy zoned Public Accommodation and is considered to be nanconforming with regard #o develapmen# standards. The applicant has indicated that the pearpose of requesttng a SDD far this praperty is to improve the appearance of the building and site as vue1i as make it a more viable hotel. The psoposal inctudes the deietion of six dwel{ing units, the atldition of twenty-four ~ 1 accommad2::on unrts, a decrease to the Club Area, a decrease in total restauranf area, madificatrons to the eleuations; a decrease in common area and the adds`tian af nine . ur?derground parking spaces. The four existing employee units wi11 remain on-site and will be permanentiy deeci restricted. The dev3ations from the Pubiic Accommodatian deveiopment standards inciude; 1. Densi , l`he propased density for the project wilf be 30.33 dweliing units (dU), which wi[I include 52 AUs, 3 DUs and 4 empiayee housing urtits. The existing density for the praject is 24.33 DU and the a!{owed density for the project 17.5 dus. The #otal density . increase is B DUs over the existing develapment and 12.83 QUs over the allawab}e . density. . 2. GRFA. Tt~e applicant is proposing a fotaf of 32,282 square feet o# GRFA. in addition to this, there is an csverage on common area of 8,456 square feet. When thrs is added to GRFA, the total GRFA #or the project wilE be 4{}i738 square feet. The aflowed GRFAtCommon Area far the pto}ecf is 32,924 sgunre teet. Currently, there is 33,902 square feet of GR-FA in the project which includes overages on comman area. This resuits in a total increase of GRFA/Cornmon Area ofi 6,836 square feet above the existing deveiopment and 7,814 square feet over the aflowable GRFA/Gomrnon Atea. 3, Common Area. The apPiicant is prapasing ta reduce cammon area, however, #he existing project is in excess of the alfowed cammon area by 13,541 square feet which is added to #he GRFA. The proposal wnutci exceed the allovvable common area by 8,458 square feet. ~ 4. Nei ht. The existing building is 67 feet irt height on the sotsth elevation and 59 feet on the north elevation. The allowab{e heigh# is 45 #ee#. The applicant does not propose to increase the ridge height, huwever, dormers will be added to both the rtorth and south of the building where the ridge heighis exceed the 45 faot heigh# alfowance. 5, Si#e Coveraae. Gurrentfy, the site coverage for the prnject is 20,796 square feet. The aPplication wili increase this to 21,350 square fee#. Which inciudes the underground. . parking and service areas. The a!lawed site coverage for the sife is 16,767 square feet. fi, , Accessorv Use, The accessory use allowance is 10% of existin G'RFA. If built as proposed, this praject wou(d have an accessory use a(lowance of 3,228 square feet. As proposed, the aliowable accessory use will be 3,426 square feet. 7his is a reduction from the existirig 4,066 square feet. Nawever, there is stifl an overage of 158 sguare feet. . 7. Setbacks. The appiicant proposes ta add building along the north side of #he project. This will be in the area of ttre entry and the restaurant. The additian af the entry will result in a i#oof setback ftom the property Iine. The existing parking structure has a o foot setback. tJn the south side of the project, the a¢pl?cant is praposing an at grade terrace which vsrili have a minirnum setback o# 2 feef. The requireti setback in this area would be 10 feet. tn addition, other areas of the building which are currently in #he ~ ~ setbacks wi11 tae infiiled. This inctudes an area on the narthwest comer as we!l as ~ decics along the rear af the btsilding. The dormers wilt atso be increasing the amount o# bui4ding in the setbaclcs. The applicant has praposed to do the fo!(owing with the appl'rcation:* 1 a Decrease the amaunt of GRFA allocated towards dweiiing units and increase the amount af GRFA for accommodafion unrts. 2. Decrease the number of dwelting units and increase the number of accammooation units. 3. Encfoach further into the #ront setback with entry and second-story accommodation unit as weil as an add#tion to fhe restaurant fo the east of the entry. ~ 4. lncrease common area whiie decreasing the area allcicated towards accessory U5e5 attd BthlE:ttC C1Ub tiSB. ` 5. Add darmers ta the building on the ndrth and south side which do nat exceed the existing ricige height of the bui3ding. fisert decks into the roof structure on the sou#h eievation. 6. Increase the amount o# si#e coverage as a resuit ofi the new entry and restaurant addition {554 square fee#}. ~ 7. Add terrace and expand dining deck on south eievafion. 8. Removal of deck on the south elevation which curren#Iy encroaches onto public ia,a. 9. The appiicant is praposing to meet the incremental increase in parking : requirements. There is an existing deficlt of 58.44 spaces on the sife. The new parking 'ss located in the fo(fowing manner: •2 spaces built underground be3aw the antry . •2 spaces adcied by relocating an existing ski starage area •2 spaces added by reiocating the {aundry room •1 space aeided aiong the snuth side of the parking structure ' •2 spaces in csntral area of oarkina structure J tOtal 10. Change exterior materials at buiiding. This inctudes stucco, wood trim, cleck raifings and a woad shake roof. 3 11. Add !!treetscape improvements. These include: a 6 fioot heated concre#e paver walk along West Meadow Drive, an 8 foat heaied cancrete paver waik alang . ~ . Vail Valley Drive extending aver the Gare Creek bridge and street larnps. The ' pavers on the bridge w`r1f not be heated. 12. Refocation of existing trash area and removal of the existing trash facility which is encroaching onto adjacent properties, . , 13. The appCicant propases tQ provide one twa-bedroom empfoyee housing unit . . , wifhin the 7own of Vail wh'?ch wiii be restcicted aceording to the 7awn of Vail emplayee hausing reqtzirements. ` . . 14. Addi#ional landscaping on the north and south srdes af the buitding: 'For fur#her detaiis on the deviations please see Section lII, Zoning Analysis, of this memorandum, which specifiy the changes in development standards for the project; Aiso, please see applicant's descrip#ion of proposal far specific details. tt. BACKGRt?llND A. Project History r The Vail Ath(etic G4ub was originatiy develaped in 1977 and inctutfed a mixed use buildirtg. wrth condaminiurcas and accammodation units as well as the health cSub facitity and offiices. Twenty on-site parking spaces were provided far the project and a variance was received for ~ the remaining required spaces. Per the fi1e rec4rds, it appears that the variarice was granted in order to facilitate the constTUCtion of hotel r4oms which were needed in #he community at the time. (n 1977, it was felt that it wouid be reasanable to gran# a parkirtg variance for the sixteen parking spaces far this property due to the proximity Q# the Town parking structure. Parking vartances for four additional spaces have been granted for the project,sirrce that time. !n addition, while varia.nces were not gcanted tor height ar densjty, the praject was allowed to deviate from th'ese standards. Setbaclc varlances were granted in 1977 for the development . of #he project. The praperty has been the subject of numerous redevelcrpments over a number af years and subseguent parking variances. , At the time of the project approvai in 1977, it was discussed fhat passibly a portian of the property which the Vail Athletic C1ub had acguired wouid not be counted towards their developable site area. Research has been conducted regarding this issue to deiermine whether or not tha# was actuatiy done. The staff has found no defin'rtive information vuhich would indsca#e that this was camp}eted. B. Previacts PEC reviews On June 28, 1993, a joint worksessian was heid wKih the Planning and Enviranrnenta! . Commission (PEC) and the aesign Review Board- {DRB} to discuss the establishment o# an SdD for this si#e. At this #ime, the 1p{3IlCc3t1t W3,5 CIiCGCted t0 WQrIf YIl4th the eXtStiT'1g VdIUCTle Of the building. it was also indicated that i# might be acceptable to expand the buildirtg adjacent to the Mountain Haus. It was stated tha# sorne expansion would be accepiable an the ~ . 4 southwest comer and that no adtiitional development shfluld be proposed on the north sPde of ~ the bUtldttlg. If1 addttlQCl, th@C@ W8S e1 GOt1Gei`n Wt~ the e1ddIt10nal Shatje/Shc'3doW b6It1g G35t OCt Meadaw Driye. {n regard to park#ng, the PEG inctica#ed that the appticant should strive #o accommadate parking on-site. . C7n 7uesday July 13, 1993, a warksession was he)d with the Town Gauncil regarding the parking for this project. Durirrg this discussiont three of the Town Courrcit members were open fo discussing further the possibiiity of pay-in-tieu parking for this srte. Three af the `tawn Cauncifi members felt that the appiicant shoufd accommada#e parking on-si#e ctue to the afready significant average of parkirrg which is nb# prcrvided an the site. As a tesutt af this _ discussion, the appticant has provided an additional nine parking spaces on the site which witt accomrnor3ate ali a# the increases in parking generated by the renovation nf the building. C3n Ju6y 26, 1993, an additonal warksession was held with the PEC. Ptease see the attached rninutes which rietail the discussion - ~ 5 ltl. ZON1hlC AiiALYStS . ~ Listed #etow is the zaning arralysis icr tha Vait Att?ietic Club St7D proposal. ALLC?WEb C}EV. EXtST4NG PRC3POSED . S7ANDARQS DEVELQPIvSSNT DEVELOP1viENT aits Area: 30,486 sq. i!. 3t},486 sq. ft. 30,486 sq. tt Setbacks. 2D feei north: -0_ narth: -0- saulh. 2' - 26' sattth: 2' -25' - fl' (decks) -04riectx), - ~ - . eastt 12 - 20' essi: 12 -ZY ' . west: 12' vvesie; 12"- . Hetght: ~eet 67 south, 59 norih . £7 south; 59 rsotth Slte Grsvarage: 16,767 sq. tt. - 20,786 sq. Si. , 16,300 sq. + 5,050 sG. ft. - 21,350 sq. ft. inc3udes garage and betow grade , service area on easY side. . Lsndscaping: 5,145 sq. ft. 9,471 sq. ft. 9,730 sq. ft. (inciuding at-grade decks) ttntts: 25 unts per acre 28 AU + 9 DU = 23 t3U(2 LDr" ' 52 AU + 3 Dti - 17.5 unfts+ d empunits" =24.33 OU{2 tA}` 29 OU (2 LA) + d emp units - 30;33 L3U (2 LO) GRFA: 24,388 sq. ft. (8Q°lo) 10.927 AU +$,t22 DU 24,647 AU +&;252 D!J ~ - 19,049 sq. - 30,899 sq. ft. + 1,383 + 1,312 emp un'tts - 20,351 emp un'rts - 32,282 + 8;456 + 13,541 wmman = 33,902 comman average = 40,738 Accessary L#se: 10°la csf exisiing GRFA 2,036 st{. tL (Allowed) 3,228 sq, ft. (Ailowed). Restaurani: 3,606 sq. ft. 3,285 sq. ft. C1ub Reiail: A60 sm ft, 14h. Total: 4,066 sq. ti. 3,428 sq. ft. , Comr»on Area: 8,536 sq. ft. (35°le) HaiisRMech: 19.235 sq, h. 14;265 sq. ft. Ccn#erence. 2.842 sq. f1. 2.727 s4. ti. Totat Common. 22,077 sq, ft. 16,992 sq. ft. {13>541 sq. ft. overage} $,458 sq, fi, avetage} Giasb Atea: .22,257 sq. ft. 20,881 sq. ft. Park3ng Garage. 4,,131 scq ft: 5.512 sq. tt. Tatat 6uiiding Sqtrate Ftsaiage,`"' 72,892 sq. ft. 75,093 sq. ff. ~ • 6 Parkicsg: 20 on-she due to 20 29 (2429'n catnpaci) aPPmved vatiances; ~ H~11s~Mect~: -0- -0- Club Area: -0- -0- Reiaii: 1.84 paricing spaces .47 parking spaces . . Canference Arsa: 11.$ parking spaces 1129 paricing spaces Restaurant: 22.5 par#cing spaces 20.3 parking spaces AU: 21_8 parking spaces 44.75 parkmg spaces DU: 16.5 parking spaces 6.5 pariting spaces Emp Unita: 4 paricina spaces 4crarkinQ s~aces • 3ata! Parlcing: 78.44 parking spaces 87.31 parking spaces . ` . ' . (8,83 or 9 space ir?cxease) , ' A ic+c4wff is an accommodation unh which is atiached in a chn+elling unii and is no iarWr than one-thind of ihe ioiat flccsor area o€ the dwa(Gng unit. " Required by the Vaii 7own Gouncii in 1977. Units are to remain on-siEe for the {ite of the buiicfing. Each employee unit counis as .333 units towards density. • indudes C,RFAIAccessary RetallRestaut`at1lClubtC.ormtortfPwking, There is a iotal increase o# building arsa o# 0^,201 sq. ft. The memorandums on ihe Vaii Athletic Club candaminium conversion process indicate that 24 AU and 5 DU were rentai reslricted and 2 DU were approved with na restrictions. There are no file recards which incicate the approval af the d addilional AL!'s and 2 Dt1's cucrenily cn-siie. IV, CRtYERiA TO BE USEC? IN EVALUATtNG THtS PROpQSAL As stated in the Zoning Code, the purpose af Speciai t7evelopment Districts is as foNows: "The purpase of the special development district is to encourage f(exibiiity and creativity in the development of iand in order ia promote its most appropriate ~ ssse: to improve the design character and quality of new deve{opment w'rthin the Tawn; to faci4ita#e the adequate and ecnnomicai pravision of streets and utiiities; to provide the na#urai and scenic.#eatures of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the cammunity asstated in the Vaii Gomprehensive . P[an. Arr approved development pian for a spec'sal deve44pment dSstrict, in conjunction with the praperty'sunderlyingzana district, sha(! estabiish the requirements guiding develapment and uses of property included in a spec'sa! _ development district." . The staff finds that #he application meets the purpose of the Specia( Development District, Specifica!!y, staff finds tha# this application furthers the overall goais of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. The project propases #a imprQVe the design character, #unction and qualify of the develapment and provide additional shart-terrn unfts within the Viffage which is a specific goal of.many efemen#s of the Gamprehensive Plan. 7he sfaff as well as the PEC have identified in past reviews that this site is appropriate for increased densities as we11 as a variety of uses due to the location and prox'tmity to the Vitlage core area. In addition, employee hous9ng and streetscape imprfltirements are proposeti which provide overali carnmunity bene#it. Staff recagnizes tPrat the existing building exceeds the underlying zoning requirements, but beEieves that due ta'the site and tocation it is suitable to allow for such devia#ians as proposed in, the appllcation given the goals and policies in the Town's Land Use Pian2 Vail Village Master Plan and Streetscape Pian. Please see Seciion VI for furt er d~ta'rls on these s, . ~ . 7 V. 5PECIAL rcVELOPMENT C?1STRICT CR!'tEFtiA . . . ~ The follvwing riine criteria should be used ta review the project. A. Deslgn campatibiirty and sensitivity to the immediate environment, . neighboncood and adjac.ent properties reia#ive to architecturat design, scaie, bu1k, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity, and atientation. Massing _ The staff feeEs that #his criterian is especiafi4y important to the review of this - project. Whi(e #his applicatinn does not propose to incsease the maxisnum ridge height, the proposal includes adding dormers to the existing roof. The amount of building area is increased with buifding infiils and the introduc#ion of a series of dormers. t?n the south side, roaf cut outs are being used for the ihree central tap units. t?therwise, dormers have been added to both sides of the raof form in order to utifize exisfing "dead" space. The applicant has alsa modified the roof form on bofh the east and west elevations of the buiiding. The east elevatian terraces back from Vaii VaIley . Drive and additional windaws have been added to this elevatian. Terracing Y?as afso been accomplished on the west eievatian adjacent to the Mountain Haus. The low eave line wfiich is main#ained w`sth th"rs praposai and the tandscaping of the site bring the scaie of the building down to a pecfestrian level. The staff ~ #esls that maintaining the pedestrian character of this area is important as 'rfi is , seen as a major carridor to Ga{den #'eak and the Village from the parking sfructure and is also used hy pedestrians to access Ford Park. The Vaii Valfage Master Plan calls #or this building ta have a maximum o# faur stories. From the onginal app(ication, the app(icant has iowered the building ta the existing ridge fine in atl locations and decreased the scale af the dormers in order to deccease the shadow on Easf Meadow Drive. SunlShade The proposed building increases the amount a# shade on East Meadow Drive by 5 fee# 6 inches in the area af the entry, 24 feet 6 inches on the west wing , and 5 feet on the east wing on December 21st (See attached sunJshade analysis). 7he impacts on shade on September 21st witl be an increase of 1 foot 6 inChes in the Center of the buiiding, 11 feet nn the west wing and 2 feet 5 inches on the east wing. The amount of shade is determined by both the angle of the sun and the height o# the ridge or eave iine. While the [}ecember 21 s# . ' c3ate creates the most impact, the September 21 st date is what is specifiied in the code for sun/shade analysis in the CCi zone district. Although this praperty . is not in CCl, the shade smpact is irnportant to address for this pedestrian area. The greatest impact in shade is seen on the west wing of the buiiding. Qn ~ December 21st, the proposed building rrrili cast shadnw onto the sidewalk. t?n September 21 st, the increase 'sn shade in this area wi!l be 11 feet and does t10t Cc1St Shc1dOW OtttO tFlB StdeW31k. It ShOLt{d be t1t3ted that the eX1S#tt1g _ - building casts shadaw beyond the sidewalk into the street in the center of the building and east wing. !n the center and east wing, the addstional shade cast wift be 5 feet 6 inches and 8 feet accordingty as a resui# of the dormers. 7"he aPPlican# proposes to heat the paver sidewalk which will maCce this area sa#er for the pedestrian. The staff feels tha# the increases in shade have been minimized to a pain# ihat is aCCeptabfe. ' Entrv On the north side of the buiiding, the appiicant propases to add a two and a ha!# story entry area to the building. 7he entry has been lowered by two ftoors #rom the original proposal. The design of the en#ry minimizes the massing impacts af the eiement and daes not add any more shade to the street. ' Bui4dinc~Footcxint w The applicant proposes ta increase #he building focatprint by 450 square feet #o aliow for the res#aurant addition and entry. Staf# daes not have a probiem with the restaurant addi#ian as no landscaping is removed. The entry wilf remove two to four trees which the applicant has agreed #o relocate or replace. Streetscape The applicant has propased to instali required streetscape impcovements discussed in section V1!l of this rnemo. This includes a heated paver walk alang Vait YaIley Drive as well as a heated paver walk along the south side of East Meadow Drive. The driveway to fhe garage wiil alsa be hea#ed. In general, the project is sensitive to adjacent properties through the use of aapropriafe architectural design and massing as weil as tandscaping, B. Usess activity and densi#y which provide a compatible, efficierit and workabie refa#ionship with "surrounding uses and activ's#y. , Clensi The appCican# proposes to increase the totai density of the praject by six dwelling uni#s. 7his inc(udes the remaval of six dweiling uni#s as well as the addition of tnrenty-faur accommodatian units. Of the nine dweliing uni#s cn-site, six are currentiy res#ricted per the ,Condominium.Conversion requirements. "Chere are two existng units which are free market and the applicant wishes to retain one additionaE unrestricted unit. The s#aff feels that because this unit is afready restricted that it should remain available for short-term rental according to Section 17.26 of the . Subdivision Regulations, Condominium Conversian, or an emplayee housing unit should be pravided in place of the restncted unit as was aliowed with the Vail Viilage lnn Goodes space. The staf# would prefer to see an additianal ~ 9 employee hausing unit versus the restricted DU provicied as we beiieve the . 40 employee hausing unit also provides an tmporttant comrnunity benefiit. The staff feels that the appEicant's desire to increase the short terrn hote# units . is very pasitive. The GRFA attributable #o tiwelling units has been decreaseti by 1,870 square feet. 43,270 square feet of £RFA will be addeci #o increase the amount af floor area #or accommodation units. The additional GRFA has . been gained by using existing dead space within #he building, using comrnon area more efficiently, and the addifion of darmers and infiCiing pottions of decks on the south side: An additianai 6,201 square feet of tota1 buitding area'will be . added with this prapasa(. In order fio insure that the AU's retnatn as short-, , . term rentaIs, the staff requests tha# the owner agree to not subtiivide the units in the future per the Cottdominium Cortvers'ron section of the Subdivision Regulatians. EmDlovee Mousinq Currentfy, four employee housing units are required on-si#e per ttie 1977 parking variance. The applicant proposes that ihese units rema'tn on-site and has agreed io restrict these units on a permanent basis. aue fio the requested irtcreases in density, the appiican# has indicated that there may be an increase - of two to four empiayees on #he site. Ufilizing the Employee Housing Guide(ines, based on the net increase in ~ cievelopment over the existing buiiding, two to faur additional empioyees woulci be generated by the expansion. The sta#f would require that ane two-beticoom or two one-bedrflom units be provided to address #he increase. The surnrnary is as folEows: a) BarfRestauran# = 321sq. ft. (Q6.5f1,000 sq. ft.) = 2.08 emplayees {decrease} b3 RetaiElService Commercial = 310 sq. ft, (@6.5l1,000 sq: ft,) = 2,015 employees (decrease) c) Dweiiing Units = 6 units (@.4iroom) = 2.4 ernployees (decrease) d) Accammadation Units = 24 uni#s (0.75iroom) = 18 employee (increase) e) Total - 114 ar 12 emptoyees . - i2 empfoyees x.15 housing mu}#ipiier = 1.8 or 2 employees -12 empioyees x.30 housing multipiier = 3.6 or 4 employees •Assurnina two employees per betiroom, fhe praposed one two-bedroom unit would be needed per the employee generation formuia. The staff has used the . higher multiplier due to the overages in density. The Employee Hvusing Repart does not differen#iate between the provision af on-site or off-si#e housing. As ~ . 10 - : stated above, tfite staff would Iike #o see one more empiayee unit provided in order to lift the use restrictian an the proposeci dweliing unit. ~ C. Compliance with parking and laading requirements as outtined in Chapter ' 18.52. r arkinq Parking has been a long.standing issue on this site. In researching the history . of this project, the staff found tha# #here were a number of variances g.ranted ta this project. !n December of 1977, fwen#y underground parking spaceswore apProved for this site. At that time, it was recflgnized tnat surface parkr`ng was not apprapriate far this site and that these spaces would be #he maximurn , number that couid be piaced on the site. Dif#erent arrangements have been made aver the years far parking on Town o# Vail lancf as weU as ather properties for tttis groject ta address the defici#. Variances have been granted for a to#ai af twenty spaces over #he tife of the project. Using today's standards, #here is an existing deficit of 56.4 parking spaces for #he project: • There wouid be a nine space parking requirement increase as a result of this expansion. This xs based on the difference between the required parking fior the proposed praject and the existing development. The apPlicant is propasing an additionai nine on-site parking spaces which would bring the total on-site spaces to ir+venty-nine. Ali of the parking spaces wouid be vaiet. ' Gurrently, the applicant vaiet parks eighteen parking spaces in the existing struciure, The paric9ng structure wiil be expanded which will accflmmodate the nine additional spaces. Due to the type o# ase of this facility, vaiet parking is appropriate and has been approved fnr other projects of this nature. With the fulf-t'rme concierge and vaiet, this type of park9ng sotution is feasible. In add1ttOCi, after reviewing the functian of the existtng #aciiitY, it aPPears that the propased plan is reasonable and, the additionai nine parking spaces ean be accommodated. The two existing exterior spaces wiil remain adjacent to the . entrance to the parkirig structure on the west side. ` No additional square faatage has been added to the heaith club and there#ore ttie staf# does no# feei tha# it is appropriate to assess a parking r.equirement #or this facility. Parking for a health club is determined by the PEC. There is na parking s#andard for this #ype of use. No parking requirement has been assessed Pn the past and the staff is not assessing any additional parking nor do we recommend to the PEC that a parking requirement be set as no club square #ootage is being praposed. '11 Loa~lmandlJefiverv The applicant is providing a loading facili#y with a pull-out from Fasi Meadow. Drive. This witl accommoda#e the shart-term parking needs of the project. Loading and Delivery wifi aiso be accommndated in this pull-off area. The _ apPlicant wiil no Ionger be aIlowed to unload deiiveries along Vail Valley Drive adjacent to #he restauranf entrance. This is a very unsafe practice which the Town does not encourage and wiii not ailow to continue. !n addit'ton, the applicant proposes to retnove the existirtg trash faciiity on the west side of the projeet. T'his enclosure encroaches both onto 7'own of Vai3 land as we11 as Mountain Haus property. The applicant would prapase ta ' include #he trash faciiity inside #he building in this same areae D. Conformity wi##t appiicable etements a# the Vail Cotnpre(tensirte Pian, Town policies and Urban Destgn P6ans. There are three other eiements of the Comprehensive Plan which app(y to this aPP(ication: The Vail Village Master Plan, the 5treetscape Master Plan and the , Land t3se Plan. Please see Sec#ions V'i, Vll, and V11iof this memofar #urther descriptions of these pians. Many elements af the Town's Comprehensive P[an encourage the development and preservation of hate!-tYPe units. The applicani proposes to add an additional twenty-four AU's and deiete six DU's for a#oial of. fifty-two At1's and three DU's. This is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan's objective to increase the hofel bed base. Please see Sectians VI, VII ~ and Vill that identify the applicable goals and objectives of the plans. E. 1dentifiication arttt mitigafion of rtatutal andJor geolagic hazarcts #hat affect the property on which the speciat develapmertt dis#rict is proposed. This site is f4caied adjacent to Gore Creek. No portion of this proposal encroaches into the 50 foot stream setback ar the one hundred year flooc3plain. F: Site plan, buil.ding design and locatian and apen space provisions designed ta produce a.functional deveiopmen# responsive and sensitive ta natural features, vegetation and overali ses#hetic quality of the community. Builc3ing Desian While.the changes ta the site plan through this proposaf are tirnited, the buildirtg design changes significan#ly. !n respect to the south or Gnre Creek side of the building, the applicant is proposing to change the character crfi the elevation wi#h the. enclosure and redesign of balconies and to ehange the window c3esign. . Dorrners will be added to #he east and west wings and decks w'tll cut 'rnta the roof form in the cenfer area. The appiicant has adjusted the south elevation ta brea}t up the facade per PEC and s#aff comments. lnitially the appiicarrt proposed to increase the height ot the westem section af the building. ~ 12 Currently, the appls`cant propases to mas`ntain a!l of the existing ridge iines and ~ nnt increase the cidge in any area of the buiiding. The staff feels that this js very positiue. (n addition, the a,ppficartt is propostng to add a terrace a# the lower ievel on the sOt1'th Sttjf.' of tfl@ pft7jG'Ct. ThIS WIIl et1Cf08Ch II1tZ~ the 20 ft70t Setb3Gk atld KeStilt in a 2 foot setback a the tightest point from the south property (ine. Un the north el.evation, the apPiicant propa$es #o in#i(I an area on the east wing -adjacent ta the restaurant and add an entry. in additioh; balconies wiil be ; - ' added to units an the east wing. Dormers wi11 be adrfed in all three areas on this elevation. This will allow for the additional accammadatian units on the upPer ievef. These additions wiil cast additional shade anta Esst Meadow C3riue. Landsca.p'sng has been proposed along the retaining wail adjacent to the ' sidewalk an the north side af the builtiing. This wiil increase the lancfscape buffer between the building and the public acea The staff €eeEs that this . additionai (andscaping is very important to the psoject as it wili screen the buitding and mitigate both the existing and proposed impacts of the builciing. Buildina's im„pact pn dpen s ace and veaet;atipn The application impac#s the existing landscaping on the north side of the buiiding. Approximately two ta four farge evergreen trees will be lost as a result o# th9s proposa{. The applicant is propQSing to iandscape alang the new ~ sfone retaining wa91 adjacent to the west wing in arder to better screen the building in areas where landscaping c3oes nof currently exist. The staff feels that while it is unfortuna#e that these evergreen trees will passibfy be lost, the addition of 1andscaping which includes evergreen and aspen trees along the sidewalk, wili mitigate the impact of the loss af these two to faur trees. The appiicant wiil attempt to save these trees. Nowevet, in the event that they cannot be saved as aresuft af this constructian, the applicant does agree to replace the trees. The agpficant has alsa added a 3 toot pfanting step to the . east of the existng at- grade parkirrg on the west end of the building in order to . help screen the parking. Ths step wi{I also reduce the height o# the wafl in this area. . C7n the sou#h side of the building, the applicant wi!l be removing arti existing deck which is currently located on Town of Vai1 Iand. The appiicant psoposes to add addi#ional iandscaping in #his area which includes shrubs and aspen trees. This will buffer the building frorn the public area. Due to the amount af iand and iandscaping between the strearnwatk and the building, adequate bu#ter areas are pravided. The proposed iandscaping adjacent to the bui[ding will be possfive and witl not hinder the useof tht5 apen space area on the sauth side of the building. The applicant has also agreed ta provide a maintenance agreement to the Town far this open space. - ~ 13 G. A cirt;ulation system designed for bath vehicles and pedestrians ~ $ddressing on and off-site traf#ic circutafion. . The applicant proposes to add nine underground parking spaces. By adding arldifional on-site parking, the vehlcufar traffic an East Meadow l7rive witl be _ increased. While it is an objective of the Streetscape Ptan #o make this area more pedestrianized, it is also an abjective of the i/ail Village Master Plan to have properties in this area provide on-si#e parking. The staff feels that the pravision af on-site parking to meet the additionai requirement is impartant given the constraints on parking our community must deal with. . T"he applicant does prapose ta mstall an entry and pu(1-off irr arder to facilitate the drop-off of guests and Ioading and de(ivery. 7`he installation of a drop-o#f area wiil be a benefi to the area as currentfy there is no off-street drop-off area fior this building and the exis#ing situa#ion creates congestion along East Meadow Drive as guests and truclcs park in the bus lane on Meadow C7rive. ?'he Tawn Engineer has signed off on this soiution. WI#h thlS 3ppIICaf10C1, the staff recognizes that it wauld be diificulfi to comptetely restrict East Meadow Drive from vehicular traffic, but would s#rive to lirnit the number of vehicles which must access East Meadow Drive. We also believe that by provid:ng sa#e wei1 designed sidewaiks, pedestrian circulafion can aSso be accommadated. The applicant's proposal improrres both pedestrian and . vehicular cireufiation in an area tha# currently must pravide for faoth uses. ~ H. Functionat and aesthefrc landscaping and open space in order to optimize . and preserve natctral features, recreation, views and functions. Due to the insta!(atian of the puli-offi and entry and relocation of the retaining wall in this area, two to fQUr evergreen trees couid possibly be iost`. The applicant has agreed ta attempt to save these trees, however, it would appear that this may not be possibie. The aPpiicant does agree to replace these trees in additian ta increasing the Iandscaping along East Meadow iJrive between the building and the raadway adjacent to the ssdewalk. 7'rees in the 30 foot range will be required ta replace the trees ihat may nat be able to be reiocated. Ttae now landscaping in front ot the buildirtg incluttes evergreens tha# range in size from 10 to 15 feet and aspens having a msnimum oi a 3 inch caliper. To the east af the main entry to the building, the app{icant is proposing to redesign the sidewalk as weil as the landscape area. This witl mvaive cutting back the existing utiiity grate and bringing the fandscape down to the same grade as the sidewalk. This is accomplished by moving the sidewalk artd curbiine to the sauth from the existing iocation. E.andscaping will also be added on the south elevation in the area where the existing deck is be'rng remaved. Aspen trees and shrubs witl be added to this area and the grades will be redone to rnatch the existing topogra,phic corrditions. - ~ 14 - - The lartdscaPing on-site witt be increased as a result of the remaval of an ~ above grade deck. With thi$ app[icatian, the projeet will be in compliance with the landscaping requirement #ar the site. - 1. Phasing ptan or subdivision plan that wilf rnaintain a workable, functional and efficient relatianship thcoughout the development,of the special development district. The applican# has not praposed that the canstruction of this project be ph'ased. VI. VAIL LAND USE PLAN The goals contained in the VaiI Land Use Plan are to be used as adopted polFCy guidelines in the review pcocess for new development proposals. The Land Use Plans GoaEsJPalicies applicable ta the Vai1 Aihietic Club redevelopment are as follows 1.1 Vail shoufd continue ta graw in a cantro!!ed environment, maintaining a balance be#ween residential, commercial and recrea#ianal uses ta senre both the visitor and the permanent resit3ent. 1.2 The quality of the environmen# including a6r, water and other naturai resaurces should be pro#ected as the Town grows. 1.,3 The quality of deveiopment shauld be maintained and upgraded ~ whenever possible. 3.2 The Vilfage and Lionsheari areas are the best Eacatian for hoteis to serve the future naeds of the destination skiers. 3.3 Hotels are important to the continued success af the Tawn o# Vail, therefore conversion to conr3orniniums should be discouraged. .4.„2 lncreased density in the core areas is acceptabie so Ebng as the existing character of each area is presenred through impiementation of the Urban Design Guide Pian and the Vail Viifage Master Pfan, 4.3 The ambiance of the Village is impartant to the iden#i#y of Vail and should be preserved. (Scale, aipine charac#er, small town feeiing, mountains, naturaf setting, intimate size, cosmopoiitan fieeling, environmental quaiity.) „5. 3 Atfardable empfayee hausing sheuld be made available through priva#e effor#s, assis#ed by limi#ed incen#ives, pravided by the Town af Vail, with aPpropriate restrictions. ~ 15 5.5. The existing employee housing base sh4uld be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing needs shouid be. ' ~ accammodated a# varied sites throughout the camrnunity. The application meets the goals and poiicies in the Land Use P1an. The addi#`ron of short-term- hotel rooms is a very positive addition to this area. ltem 4.2 specifies that increased densities in the core are acceptable if the character of the area is preserved. `fhe applicant proposes to change the character of the buitding by changing the materials and design detar`ls of the builcting. Whife the proposal increases the size of the building, the staff believes that the - appticant has attempted to utilize ttte unused interior spaces of the bu9lding to minimize. the - expansion on the exteriar a# the buiiding. The scale and rissign of the buitding wr#h the, addition of new materials and Eartdscaping maintain the alpine character of #'ie developrnes?t. . iltl. VAIL VfLLACE MASTER PLAN . The proposed redevelopment of the Vaii Athle#ic Glub carries out many of the goals and objectives contained in the Vaii Village Master Plan. Applicabie goals and objectives are as fol}aws: Goat #1 -Encourage high quafity ret3eveiopmen# whi}e preserving the unique archttectural scaSe of the 1liilage in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. Obiectsve 1.2 - Encourage the upgrading and tedevefaprnent of rssiden#ia1 and cammercial facilities. ~ Goal #2 - Ta faster a strang touris# industry and pram4te year-round ecannmsc heaith and viabiiity for fhe Village and for the community as a whoie. Qbiective 2.1 - Recognize the variety of fand uses found irt the 10 sub-areas throughaut the Village and allow for deuetopment that is campatible with these established iand use patterns. C?biective 2.3 - fncrease the number of residential units ava'rlable for short term overnight accommodations. PolicY 2.3.1 - The develapment of shorC term accornmadation units is s#rorrgly encouraged. Residential units that are deveioped above existing density {eve1s • are required to be designed ar mar3agett in a manner that makes thern avaifable for shnrt term ovemight rental. Obiective 2,5 - Encourage the cantinued upgrading, renovatidn and maintenance of ex'ssting {odging and commercW faciiities to better serve the needs of our guests. . Policy 2.5.1 - Recreation ameni#ies5 cornmon areas, mee#ing facilit'ses and other amenities shall be preserred and enhanced as a part a# any redevelopmen# of ladging properties. ~ 16 , 'Obiective 2.6 -Encourage the development of affacdabie hausing units ihrough the efforts of the priwate sector. Oblec#ive 2.6.1 -Empiayee hpusing units may be required as part of any new _ or recieuelopmeni project rp-questing density aver that allowed by existing zoning. Goal #3 - To recognize as a top priority tfie enhancement of the walking experience throughout the village. . Otilective 3.4 - Develop additional sidewaiks, pedestrian-onJy waikways and . accessible green space areas, inciuding pocket parks and stream access. Goal #5 - lncrease and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aestheiics of the transportation and circulaf'son system thraughaut the Vilfage. PolicY 5.1.1 -For new develnpment that is lacated otatside of the Commer.c'raI Core lZane C?istdct, on-site parking sha!l be provided (rather than paying into the parking fund) to meet any additional parking demand as required by the zoning code. Policv 5.1.5 - Aedevelopment projects sha11 be strongfy encouraged to provide underground or uisually conceaied parking. , . Obiective 5.2 -Encourage the use o# public transportatian to rninimize the use ~ of private au#omobifes throughout Vail. Afihough #his location is not addressed '€n ariy sub-area eoncept of the Vai{ ViNage Master Plan, tt t5 diSCllSSF:d Wlth CegaCd t0 thB hB1ght of bUIIdiClgS. The Vail Vilfage Master PEan specifies that buifdings adjacent to Gore Creek should have a height of four stories. 7he existing buiiding is four stories aiong East Meadow Drive. The proposal builds into the . existing roof to #osm afifth f4oar. 7his is being accompfished by adding dormers, infilting partians of decks on the south sitie, and using existing common area and dead space in the roof form. Nane of the ridge iines will be increased anc3 aii o# the existing eave fines wiil be maintamed, - This applicatipn addresses ihe four Vail Viliage Master P{an goals which are appticable to the site. it also meets the twelve pafiicies anci objectives which are appCicab(e. Vltt. STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN . The Streetscape Master Plan paints out that traffic on Vail Vaitey t7rive is very heavy , throughou# most of the year. It is especially heavy in the maming and late aftemoons during the sici season, and evenings and weekends during the summer rnonths. Pedestrian traffic has increased because of the expansion o# the i/illage Parking Structure and the creatioR of a new easterrr exit portal fram this facility at Vai1 Vailey Drive. Speci#ic improvemen#s for Vai! Valfey Qrive in the area of the llail Athietic Glub include the addition of art $ to 10 faot wide heated concrete unit paver walk on ihe west side of 1TaiI Va1ley Orive extending over the ~ ' 17 ~ bridge at Gore Cree!~ and a 6 foot wide cancrete unit paver walk vn the south side of East ~ Meadow Dr.ive. The applicarit has incfutfeci these impcavements in this appfication with the - excep#ion that onfy a 6 faot walk is beirrg proposed atong Vail Val(ey Drive due to site canstraints and 8 feet along Meadaw Drive. tX. STAFF RECOMMENDATiONS The sta#f recommends approval af the applicaflan. We find that the propQSal has devetoped inta one which is in compliartce with the objectives and purpose section af.the SDQ zone : district as we!l as #he.other Comprehensive fi'Ian elements as_described in the memo. The - aPProval includes the foliowing understandings: 1. That the owner wiil permanentiy restrict the 52 Aus as short-terrn rental uni#s and #hat the 52 Ausshalt not be subdivided in #he fu#ure to aitaw for individualownership. The condaminium declaratians shal{ be amended to include this point befofe any occupancy permits will be released. 2. En addifion ta the one twa-bedroom permanently deed restricted emp{oyee ~ hausing unit, the owner shall provide one-bedroam emp(oyee hous'sng unit to allaw for the use restriction to be lifted from the restric#ed dweliing unif. The emplayee housing unit restriction agreements shafl be srgned and submittecl #or staff a,pproval befare a building permit will be released for the project. f he fnEipwing items wili need to be addressed further as the project develops into working drawings. ~ 1. Engineered dravrings wi!l need ta be submit#ed which address #he streetsca.pe improvemen#s for revierrv by the Tawn Engineer befare a buifding permit is released #ar the project. The staff feels that the appfication is a pasitive one and does meet the gaals and abjectives of the Town's Camprehensive P}an. 7hese include the Land Use, the Viiiage Master Flan,. Zoning Code and SDD Criteria. We recognize that the proposai devtates from the exist'rng zaning. We recognize that it is important to increase accammodation units as well as maintain and Emprove existing bu'ridfings in tawn in order to maintain the area. We feel that ' ihis is a site which can handie increased densi#y and deviations fram the site develapment > standards which include height, density and site coverage while maintaining #he existing sca1e and character of the neighboncood. c:lpeclrr?emos\vac.927 • ~ 18 , 1 ~ • i ' [ . nX: . t L~ i tl! ~l.1.~ ~l:i::l:3 ' + t~ '•,c.°: t"'s' ; ~ • ` ~~~~1L[`_' ~~II - - - - „ < l~. . irri ~tn-. i[~ . ~ . . _~.L. . ? _L'1`.4~5`..3.+ ~ i =I _ im - W-11 f i ~ i r ~°""'i TWRIMAMMA~4 .~••I~1~~--~~~~~13t 1~~. ~ . ` , t ( r ( ~ f fli. T` ! ' . ~...,.r_._.~_...~_. .I ~ ~ ~ f ` #e' , . ' • ` ' . M j` ~ ~ l ' ~ ~ ~ • ( ' ~ " ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ! . • 1 vhiLAnu.UIccurs sSouch Eevatioa, l . • ' is~.ma w.r:~~ r r`r~i .r ~°~e" vr. K.r . i ~ • lr~..nr ~ ~ ~ ' t.. M~wse~rl+rwn.rt~w i•tt-'1y S .t „ 4 . . , . , . _.a....r . . . _ ' + ~ ~ , ~ ~ i . . `~t t4~Ll.i I ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ _ - • EE ~ J-~~ . , ` % S ~ . , ~ • t t ~ ~ . a._... ~ « ~ t . ~1 ~ . ~ ` t, • '~w . ~8 .@~. ~{i~ir~~{#~{jiy~j'rj.` • . ~ ~ ~I ~M . . . ~ ~..~.w i ~ . krc«n c~.cv~.rra?~t . ~ ' YkII, f1T'HI,EI'IC Q.UB EteYStIOqS er..rr , ` • ' , ~ . , ~ ~ ~w~w~wt~ M M~M~vtrMtt t~ll'+ 1=P . ~ ` . ' µ . M++70 lN MIt Ae ars 1IM s .irs if ~ 11 ` . . ~ .r ! . . . . . s ..~..e,. . ~ L{. ~1 . • v . ~ . • . '~'.~l.c~+~."_... - ` ~ ' . . . . • . -tr ~ i~srwtlw4~~: ' t • L ~ ) . • ~k Y . rf M _f rk 1~~......~ t' i• J ~ ( . ~ t f M, ft I to F I ~..~_.~...~..'..~`...r........t.,_.~ _ ._.e.._. ~ ~ ` _ ~ ~ ~ ~y..!'""=''ct ; ~..._..~y : w....... ~ j l+~ ~ w.vr~w~aw.• t !'.i~~ : r_._...~..s,~..~ N lH{i.« ! Y~` ' w ( r..a'rw Nwr ~ i ~ ! r++w( ~ tr wm rY+«~ o w.,uti.. ~ti Yi.rc++w. r~rfr I w+rw.n ~`~r~,~=•. ....+t ~ s• ~ it- I k . ~ LL M' • t--'--' r i utsR/~~t ~ ^ ~ , E. ~ fE~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~...~d.....~.~.~ lrfrl • ~ 4 ~ (_"t i t~ ~v. { riks.~~.a? ` ( !rr [ ea rwa~• tA f j I ~1 ta. r . Q••••t••~•1 , in+t Y t /?i.~w.M :Y 1~ ~ 1 !1~ •_•_.u. ~ . V^IV~ . r ~ 441Y~W4++ ~ti . I E ~ v./Hi1 iM,l~W / R L~ 1 Mn v~+e~ i tR il a~IL It ~ I . . . . . 1._.~ fRt 7Rt ~ tR. ? ~ iRi IlIN qr .1 f • ~ ! ~ . ~ . . ` I . ~ . L : k' ! I t ' - M.....F~ ~ L_~._.__~.~ y' 4...wr~.Jwrr K. NN.~' s t ~ wR ~ N+U r wr r.~awRf~as~ . . . k • . f«~s r~t r__"'~~..,, , ~,F , . ~ i - ' ' ' n»-.~.... w... n• ,r . n.r . k. ea-v.. s.. .w. r.,....~ 4 0 Q b ' . . ~~wc • a.~ ~ - . t~u+~M.w v...~c.~r+c , + ~ rc~ N~•t trrs ~xe.. ~~~'A UPCkY"llC21ICl1~ub M ff."FL ETIC L:L.l7B rtRi L.R ~ • M M.Y! wtMN. . wy,K 4{tL ~M' 'I . f lL /t f7{L irIVY3RYY~Mi 06~Y.! w~. M.~ ti.• Htf • Attrr.w ~it~ + {WM'IK 4 4 M ? • NkW4./rMi~ ~ti~ji46r{i~14~ a•• • r ~ 4 f f .l . ' 4~tlHl4 M. ~ D'. O ! e • kw~ , M~ ~ E?V d ~1t fw'~ r. ~Fi~iM~kesAh.rf ~ . r~ f . ~ ~ ~~1{7. . ithlr+"M,~+t 1t.Rt M.s4 f+! • . . 4 = arar~Ma.a art~irw ~ . . 1~t.wi i.H - w -ki• • ~?utlt, .141 'K .16 ^f-+n .:5.._ r~.rana..«a.,rs»ruww ~ r«v.wa K««•> 1,. KK+" j 1,WVt, . , • _ . . " t s _ ''r -i' ~wY,..~,a~.~.~..;. r-. _ • ~t~. 1•~~~1b . , ` ~...e.. . F • ~ ~ 4 y~~~ ~ { f • ~ ~ • ` ~'W++...,,ti`.~"~+-. w` ~ ~ , • + p 1~''\~ r._ :;=~r;a..w.~ ~ . • !ip a ~+,,,f• ' ? f A n~ 4 ~ . ~1 b{- • • t,,,,, rw rwwt ' ~.y.w+.+~nw_.~.._~~~ w.~~i~ • ~ r~~u • , " ~'i' ~ ` j l,rW ) i+...y) ! %.~t~..._ . rr~ p„ ~ • s R ^ • v N. K.. d `!~1.~'l . ...,,.a., ` r ( r««„ ~ a . to ~ ' . • ~ i F~'y , ` ~ n , U-.....4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ `a"'• . + ~ .w.~ ~ • m~P5- . ~ ~ ..k - f ~'~__'~S7 ° • ' ' ~"*vF NwMi',~l R~vYY ~ i 1 .~~1. e , ` j. f 1 ' • w.. . m 11 ~ .f ~`i%• prf 'r; ! { ,i'.~~•1 _ . p . . 7_ _'r~ 4 , . ..__,__'F . . ~fA. .~'RISRLf~AI.4 . ~DL.NA/4'( h12AtYw}~ir . ~ . • 4ww+ tYtt /~kew MF4~W. !+lMf4JR? , ex.,o... at.~ ~ ts~a . rsr~ ~ tiwt• a.rt. v rr.r».r. '!i r~: • u r..~e ~ t a.,.. y.r. ~ t..,r~;; t ,a.. ~,V/l?LATt{I.Ef1C{~1$ ~~tTC ~~OOC ~~(i • ' ? OY"! 1 C I/t4. *Itw1 iM1 ~~a111 wu... !}Iwv~ k.. } tlfLSiN Yk1t~k . l'Mi 4( . , t}r.l'af. • /uu+~. ~ 1( r`*5' . 1a 6k''rt t f MtTL. S . D+q UMt b+wwlY _ .+~[~t 6j?F rttF4M K ~'~Mat.G~? L G"?'+.~ . F ~"'x..rs 4b q' L . ` 4WS/u..I.qYf V'*"++/ AW 4~4 C ?li<iaae~?yYk~.M(N ' Vr ~•.•N . te,sMru .~S2tEtl. ~lKG!~•. SSiEStfs_......~- J w s~s~..er~y««...r-aM w.r "r•"~- 6NMI~Mr NttML~~warK~ 17E11Yw~(~Mi• /ih1fl•K.11w }'4~M..NIf.~p~.k.ti ~ i•~•.l~.e. ' !°'°'wFO ?/~4~v t1t tt~1lNFt~~V/NUay f~"+R71lJRM4j~Y7M~M ~G•y "~'(~'1:. • ti. 1"'e • l4~w Y 4" -ft.l. -H~ns v-61N. sr*~I"4e*1• 1H . ~ , ~.•-`~4 t « w•• ~ ~yw•rtl. ~..~w~L 6' Pi J C~ ~ • ';-~"~`~`1 ~ . ~ . . i~(1 j~.t•[Y +-y- , . ' ~i pyw.v "~:wa' ~ ••ww~ ~ i ~~y~Ml ~e 4 YG ~4-.^....--^~"'. . . ~ i ; 4 .wil ~ f: ~ ~ ? ~ ' Y~1 M ~ j(' • . • V ` wMP^ f M~?M+'"~ I~ w..r--, ~ ~ `~~q 'Q~ ' ~,.r H«M . ~,~„~.~v11.. ~y~y ~ ~ t! . • r pv ~ .(lttnrl . i~. ~ w+~'" c~,V! ' .(M'A ~'wt~+tl ~ tM}YY . 1a ~ . J . sW rW wY ~ ~ t ,s { S t Y.W . . ""ww . . . ~ WUt1LS ~~t7 F *,r,,, .s «~ry4 Ry t~.f4 #r, r «..i."'w`t' ~ ~ ~ N~t !w'' ~ si+ [K+I• • ~ ' ' . ' • ' ,yy ~f t.9f r- w....,,~, Mt.~.... . , w.r ItutiY {v:n t+rep~ ~ • { • . l ~ ~ ~ i"~•• \M',Yi iMV~ tY1'M} f`M } 'I . _ _ _ - ;CS a ~ . . . . . . . x ~ x . ~ . QM ~[x . h w/! k M W l~ \r ~~K " ~ . • Fub •y1 ~ . i I " wwa•. ~~i~. N ; »wr. . ~A~lL ATf{~.~TICCLilB 1 ~ t«,,..; : t~~.a,~.~t• t.... 7htrcl F2C5or t'[alri , ' . ..«.t...~ ,r~. M•'"'^ .y,~ . r.rU.tl,...w A.. 3;~ . . , .4-+.»/tiw r.t,.t . ~ra..,,.w...l.,,,,,~^'.•i~..n,4 R i,w•..~4~.~„ ~ . Ly +t ' l~+tet trs ~~~Y,t• r~ +V w .t,. '•t' ~ M 1-N•SS ~ . . . ' , ~ . . . . . . ~ . . . . . • , . , j: f . ~ i i ~ I . . . , . ~ ` ~ . ~ . ~ f ~ • • ' ' ` ~ . , . ' ~ • _ ~ 1~'.:: r 4~.. vt • . . i . . ~ . ~i ,..,+.,.«ovt ; . y, • ~ , ~ ` ` • • f . ' MH" . . . ' . " w . ~ . ' - . < . ° , , • 1 ' - . . • . ~ . ~ " ' ~ Flftlf Ftoor Pla~ ; . . _ . . . . ~ ++1' wtw ~~r ~ ri ~=Y•~ y ~a~~_lt'e_'1'}-._..~~_ J,.~~. ~ M. , ~ ~ ' . ' ~t .i i j! ~ . ~F"~"_•-;;._._.~ . ~ ' ~ ~ ~ •f ~ .n... r • ~ j• r,.../~' . ' tr~ wa ~1.+rrw...t / w~' ' ~ C , y ~ .r 'l i~n. rr/' _ . t%* •rt C} t i , ~ r~.' ~ ~r` , y~ , t.~.%.,,.a ~ ~ . , r ~ •.j J t" / - . . / ff ~j~. y~ * f % ..~~r ~ _ L.a».-~ r~' ~~~~Q, e_ f ..z iN M Mf' M W. ~ ••f ~ ' ~ • MNwy i ~ 4w ~ r.,. 1N. rn ? ~ . . . J / . ~ ~ t «i % , ~ ~ « yw f • / . , . I~ . Gn:.~v ~ ra ' w.R. . sc np?t . / ' j~ . ~ ~ : , / f. . S Z~, •w _ w... - L.~.::..":... / ~ 1 • . • ~~f~..~I~.i.v~.~~.~L . . ~ ~ ~ K ~ { KRf ~ +1-' ~ ~k~ ~ e . , . . x ~ ' ~ , . . r...v lY.s ~n+~~ ~ r.w u~ atts. VAII.ltTttE,E1'CC Q:.11$ ~ roUCth F14?DC PLi;EI . ! wr.~.a. w r..~ '~+.F~w 1telM: t.l w.un. lww~~t~~rc~~~ S' . . , l..~ 1w4 y 1 ~raro. IY' . . • , . { M tfeiw L.. vw~e f~.fn.srg.i.l..s 14k~ 6•'p`.1% . . " ~ . ' , . . s+"~v.y(ttief.. Na1K . ~ ~ ~.:..~;"`'~F1N.fi4.MLiNi S a.. 1~~t•°1'! • ~ v.l~IL CLUi , • ~epCE'.Tllber 11, 1993 ~ SDI2 STATEhm`TT CaF PF(QMS ED ITVVRt")VEM€YM The Vail Athletic Club (VAC) agrees as part of the imglementation of our SL?D - proposal to znake the follaiving irn.grovements. . Lv `v The tjAC ivfll extend the curb and sidewallc 6'-0'" along East Meadaw Drive and48'- . 0" aldng Vail VaIIey Drive to create a continuous, heated, recrangular concrete . paver sidevvall: extending from west end af the VAC service/parking drive on East Meadow Drive to the Gore Creek Bridge nn'Vail Valley Drive. This tnrsll be coord.inated with the totivn engzneer. We wzll revise the curb_line at intersection of Fast Meadow Drive and Vail Valley Drive in accorc3ance with the "entry featt~-e" rancepts put fQrward in the V~,iI ~~illage '~~aster Plan and ~s shoivn on the site plari. At the "entiy feature" and part.iaIly along Vai1 VaI.I.ey 17rive, cve will el.iiznznate rhe existing retaining wali to bring the landscage dawn to the Ievel of the sicieFval,k. We NviII reface t.he existing Ianc3scape retaining Nvalls along the garage and Vail ~ Valley Drive ivxth stone. ~Ve ivill incorporate signage to inform vehicles that East Meatiow Drive is a "pedestr%an area" apen only to vehicles on "official business" v+r`ith the "VAC and the iNlountain House. We «,ill N11ork vv=it:h the Design Reti-iew Board and ALPP to supplement the existing streetlamps along the VAG side of Vaii Valley and East Meadow I.Drives, We will create a netv car pull-off guest drap-aff area directty in front of the new hotel/health club entry. T'his area will be paveci ivith granite pavers anci heated. We Nvill need consent from the tov\rn's authorities that short-term parking in the opposite direction wzll be penmitted here. The creation of the new hateIlhealth club enuy and ca,r pull-off along F.ast Meadow Driue shouici result mtn;mal c3isruption to the existing vegetation in the Iandscaped area above the existing garage. All neressary steps will be taken throughout the course of canstruction to protect the existing vegetation. New drainage grates wi.Il be introduced to handlg melting runoff at East Meadaw Drive. This tivill be caordi:nated with the tocvn engineer. ~ . We will replace the existing cvoad transformer grate wzth a new steel grate. - jn c,1srape C'±ofie re _k L.~Sc)uth...Side ' Nle will work with the town to formahze an infarma1 maintenzince aga-eement regarding the town`s progerty between the VAC aad the pedestrian path alang G* Creek.. , VVe wili prune the dead bnssh iu the area between the VAC and Gore Creek,., We will remove the existing waoci sundeck that is parti.aily on town proPertY, as we11 as the e'xzst2.ng wood utLlity shed by the hot ttxbs and t.he ex%sting wflod trash shed at tthe servicelgarage dnve. . We wit.I create a 3anclscaped path fram the end Of the existiug service drivelfire Iane through to tbe town praperty on the south side of the VAC. We wM construct a new stone terra.ce at the exist,ing uppes health ctub/swimming paol level alortg the south side of the building as shown on the site plan. Bilild,ing P terio_r VVe wi1,l restucco the entLre outside of the buitding. The stucco color wi11 be light, natural color. There wi11 be a stone base by the new entry. VVe wM be instal.ling a new wood shi.ngle roof throughaut ~ We wM be introducing new wood tim anci roof overhangs as shown on t.ie elevations. We wil.1 be revising the exist%n.g porches, baiconies and decks with new wflod trim to create the more traditional porches shown on the elevations. , . We will be extending the existing dinirig deck along. the sauth side of the restaurant tfl cQnnect with the new hotel Iounge. We will be constructing a new on-grade hotel/health club eutry on F.ast Meadow Drive. - We wM he e.xtenciing the north wall of the restaurant 6'-0?' to the noxth an& fffiing . in an existing 28' x 9' "indentatiam" altsng the south side of the diniag te,rrace. We wM be iustalling new woad windows and doors thraugbout . . , We wil.1 be addiag new dormers at the fourth fioor level along barh the north and ~ south sfdes of the exi,sting stucture. We wiil be addizxg new chiffineys throughout f4r the new gas fi.replaces. J71.terj1f7r. im.nF'C?Me.me.j=..=~..~.,Pal't}"t Cl'LI'E? - " , b • The improvements to the bea.lth ciub v~ll not be extensive, they will focus on increasing the spa and cardiovascular caparity of the r.lub and adding new door's ~ and wi.ndows aiong the south wall of the upper Ievel in order to introduce znore natural light into the club. Most are.as of the club stay a:s they are. We wi1l be adciing new floors at the upper hea2th club levei abave the weight room. and the existing racquetba]1 court . We will be Zreating anew staff Iockerlltsunge area at the Iawer hea3.tb: club level.. . j~ t-eriQr Tm,nr~tr P,nts - ,rage, . Our SDL7 ProPasat will create th.e need for an adclitional ~cars ta be p~ked on site. We wiU be relocating a portion of the existing laundry facility to create roo:m for 3 additional cars and el.imminating two starage rooms to create room for an additidnal 4 cars. The rema.; ning 3 cars will be accamoda.ted with3n the existing garage . tthrraugh a valet pa.rking arrangement • ,~,tericsr ImprQV,ernen,ts - JiQtel . We will be creat.in.g anew double-high hoteI Iobby and Iounge area which will ~ eQnnect to the new laotellhealth club enLzy. There wM be a new open stair to abalcony abave the lobby at the secanc3 flflor. We wiU be renovating and revising the existing conference room on the fu•st floor, adding a new baardroam at the second floor and creatin.g a uew meetzng raom along the south side the fu-st flaar of the building. We will be r°elocating twa emplflyee units from rhe fovrth floar to the f~rst floor. . The nther twra employee units wili be relocated to the t;hird floor. These units will be main:tai.n.ed on-site, as per a previous agreement3 for the I.ife af the structure. We will be eliminatin:g -6 existing DIJ's and add'zng 24 new AU`s to create anew raom mix of 3 DUrs and 52 AU's. . The average si.ze of our new botel room (Al'.T) -will be increase by 54 square feet to 478 square feet from 424 square feet AI]. of the existing hotel rooms wM be tot:ally renovated. ,A3l of the batbroams will be renoyated and made larger. ~ , , . I~tt~'t'inr T~~~C~~'e~'ne~nts _,~?jh .l ~h • • . , The improvements to the healtti c;i.ub wiU not be exttenszve, they wiU foeus ou increasiug the spa and casciiovascul,ar capaczty of Lhe club and adding new doors ~ and windows along the south wail of the upper 1evel in order to introduce mare natural. 3iRhx into the c1ub. Most areas of the dub stay as they are. We will be adding new floors at the upper hea.ith cl.ub leveI above the weight room and the existing racquetball court. We wi1l be creating a new staff Iockerllouuge area at rhe lower health club 1eve1. , nroy-e?-n...ents..._- . G Tam-. . C}ur SDD proFosaI will create the need for an additional }0 car.s to be parked au site. We will be relocatin.g a partiozc of the existing Iaundry faei.Iity to create roflm for 3 additional cars and eliminatzng two storage rooms tca create xooan for an addinonal 4 ca.rs. The remaining 3cars will be accomcadated wizhin the existing garage through a valet parkiug arrangemeut j rrtot' Tltg12rovemQ.~,i1'..S We wiLi be creatiug a new double-high hdzel Iobby an.d Iou.nge area which wi11 canrzect to the new hotellhealth club entry. There will be a new open stair tfl a~ balcony above the Iabby at the second floor. We will be renovating and revisin.g the e>dstfng conference room on r.he first floor, adding a new boarciroam at the second #loor and creating a new meeting room alang the scauth side the fi.rst flaor of the building. We wiff be relocati.ng two employee units from the fourth flaor to the first floor. The ather two emplciyee units wiU be relocated to tb.e third flaor. These units wiU be maixitained on-site, as pess aprevi.ous agreement, for the life of the structure. We wzll be ebmiaating 6 existing DU's and adciing 24 new AU`s to create a new rtom mix af 3 DU's and 52 AtT's. The average size of our rsew hotel roflm (AU) -will be increase by 54 square feet to 478 square feet from 424 square feet A11 of tb.e existing hotel rooms will be totally renovated. AII af the bathraonis wiT.l be renovated and made larger. , r ~ PLANNING AND ENVlRONMENTAL COMlVIISS(4N , Aprii 26, 1999 Minutes MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSEiVT: STAFF PRESE1Vl': John Schofaeld Lorelei Donafdson Galen Aasland George Ruther Diane Golden Judy Rodriguez Brian C?oyon Tom Weber Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill Public Hearinq 2:00 p.m. 1, Swearing in of new F'EC mernbers Chas Bernhardt and doug Cahill and reappointed I'EC member Jahn Schafield - l.orelei Donaldson, Town Clerkd 2, Election o# 1999 ChairNice-Chair, C?iane GoIden nominated John 5chofield #or Chair for a 1-yr. term. John Schofield asked if #here were any other naminations. There were nonen ~ Brian Doyon seconded the nomination, Diane Go(den naminated Galen Aa5land for Vice-Chair for a 1-yr. term. John Schofield asked if there were any other nominations. There were nonea Tom Weber seconded #he nomination. The nominatians passed by a vote of 7-0. 3. A request for a final review of an amendment to Speciaf Developrnent District #30 (VAC), to alfow for an additi4nai dweiling unit and the reduction of accommodation unifs, located at the Vaii A#hletic Club, 352 E. Meadow DrivelParcels A& B, Vail Viliage First Filing. Applicant: JWT 1987 Limited Partnership, represenfied by John PerkinsPfanner: Dominic MaurieIlolBrent Wiison Chas Bernhartlt said he would abstairt from the vote since it was not fair to the developer, as he was not here for the previous meeting, but he had some questions #ar the applicant. John Schofield explained that abstention would nat be required if he felt #here was no con#lict. ~ Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes April26, 1999 , . George Ruther summarized his mema for the: benefit o€ the new members and said' the urrit in question was the east unit, correcting a mistake ih the,memo, George said this was ~ scheduled to go before the Town Gounci! May 4, 1999 and that: this was a recommendativn to Tawn Council. . Stan Cope with the Vai! Athlet`rc Club gave a brief history to get the new members up ta speed. Me gave the increases in the square footage and intraduced the present owners of the previaus Fitzhugh Scott unit who were requesting the 713 sq. ft. . Gaien Aasland asked for an exp{anation of the lock-aff, John Perkins explained the lock-off on the 4`h filoor of the building, , Stan Cope expiained the chartge in the number of rooms. He explained that there were no changes in the height, ridgeline or footprint. John Schofield asked for any pubiie comments. There were nane. Galen Aasiand asked George #a read the Ordinance regarding interior conversions. George Ru#her read the C3rdinance. John Schofieid said technically we don't have to approve the 5th floor, jus# the DRB. Galen Aasland said it met the guidelines required for an SDti. Ghas Bernhardt said in 1993 there were 4 EHU"s and due to the increase in dertsity the applicant said 2 more EHU's would be added. He asked if ttrere was a requirement for more uni#s nn site. ~ S#an Cope said it was the same sq. footage and a new EHU wiN be ofif-site. Ne said he-wcsu[d like to have a range of square footage in the ordinance to expand the EHU if they chase to do soe Diane Golden explained to the new members abnut the lengthy discussions regarding the smalfer size af the EHU's and said that she preferred a larger unit. Doug Gahi11 asked abou# the number of rooms. Brian Doyon said there was a need for larger units and encouraged it. Tom Weber said Fre was in favor of 'rt. John Schofield asked why a dwelling unit can't be treated as an accammodation unit- Stan Cope said the difference between a DU and an Al7 is the kitchen. He said people like to rent units with kitchens. John Scho#ie{d said what if we required you to rent your units instead of selling thern and he said he assumed the applicant would encnurage the new owner to rent. Stan Cope said, yes. Planning and EnVironmental Commission Minuies ~ Apri1 26> 1999 . , George Ruther said 48 would` be the rnaximum number of AU's without a dev'ration fram the ~ parking requirernent. John Scho€ield suggested ta have a range af square foatage for the, ENU as part of the motion.: Stan Cope suggested the range ta be between 1143 sq. ft. and 1300 sq. ft. Brian Doyon made a motion for a recommendation ta Town Council in aecordance with the: conditians in the staff inemo and with the addition of two more corrditions: 1. That the number of AU's fali in the range between 46,48; and 2. That the total square footage of the four EHU's be not less than 1,149 sq. ft.-1,300 sq. ft. Tom VUeber seconded the motian, 7'he motion passed by a vate o# 7-0, 4. A request for a final review o# an amendmenf to Spec9al Deve(opment District No. 4{C]en L.yon), reuising the Glen Lyon O##ice Building site (Area b)9 located at 1000 S. Frantage Raad WestfLo# 54, Glen Lyan 5ubdivision. Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg Planner: Domirtic Mauriello TABi.Ed UNTIL MpY 10, 1999 ~ 5. A request #or a variance from Seciion 12-6D-6 of the Tawn of Vail Municipal Code, to allaw for an encroachment inta the required side setbacks, lacafied at 3003 Beliflower Drnre /Lot 9, Block 6, Vail lntermountain. App(icant: Mr. GuillermoNuerta F'Ianner. George Ruther TABLED URITIL MAY 10, 1999 8. A request for a variance fram Section 12-6C-6, to allaw for the eonstructron of agarage within a front setback and Section 12-10-8, to a11ow fdr the construction of an undersized garage, located at 5125 Black Bear l.ane I Lot 11, Block 2, Gore Greek Subdivisitan. AppliCant: Montogomery (Mike) Mathias Planner. Ailis4n Ochs TABLEU llNTIL MAY 10,19997. A request for a final review of a propased Iocker roam expansinn to the Dobsan Ice Arena, located at 321 E. Lionshead CirclelLot 1, Baock 1, Vail Lior7shead 2"d Fiiing. Applicant: Vaii Recreatian District Pianner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL MAY 10, 1999 ~ Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes April26, 1959 8. A request for a modificatian to a platted building envelope, laca#ed at; 1047 Riva Glenl Lo# 6, Spraddle Creek Estates, Applicant: Franco D'Agastino, represented by Robert Mach Piannere A11'rsnn Ochs TABLED llNTIL MAY 10,1999 9, A request for a variance from Sectian 12-6D-6, to allow for a building encraachment inta a rear setback, Iocated at 2657 Arosa Drive / Lot 8, Black D, Vaii Ridge., Applicante Town of Vaii Pianner: A1lison Ochs TpBLEd UNT1L MAY 10,1999 10. A request for a variance firom Sectian 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) af the Town of Vail MunRCipal Code, to aliaw for site coverage in excess of 200/o and a variance from Sectian 12-6d-6 {Frant Setbacks} of the Town of Vail Municipal Gode, to allow for an encroachment into the front setback on a PrimarylSecondary Residential zorred 1ot, located at 362 Mili Creek Circle I Lot 9, BIock 1, Vail Viilage First Filing. Applicant. Walter Forbes, represented by Gw,athmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL MAY 10,1999 ~ Diane Golden made a motion to table items 4-1 Q. Doug Canill seconded the motion. The motian passed by a vate of 7-0. 11. lnfiormation Update • 1999 PEC rep. ta the DRB - Apr. - Jun. - Tom Weber .lu1, - Sep. a Chas Bernhardt Oct. - Dec. - Galen Aasland Jan. - Mar. QO - Doug Cahill • 1999 AIPP Appdintment- (Dtane Golden-1998) • 1999 Open Space Cammittee (Galen Aasland -1998) George Fiuther asked the PEC for a volunteer to sit on a Board ta reuiew the Environmenta! Award nominations. He said the DRB has halted the MarriotC and wanted a jaint mee#ing with the PEC to understanci why the PEC approved it. Gearge asked if the PEC could be at the May 5`n P?anning and Environmenta! Commission NTinutes ~ April26, i999 DRB pre-meeting. He also merrtioned the Northwes# CC9G meeting :next week on housiing. ~ George advised:the PEC that fihe Rtains praject rnade it through cleaniy and then reviewed it for the new members. 12. Approval of Aprii 12, 1999 minutes. Tom Weber had changes. Diane Golden made a motion #o approve the minutes. Galen Aasland seconded the motitin. The mation passed by a vote of 4-0, with Brian aoyon; Doug Cahiil and Chas 8ernhardt abs#aining, Doug Cahill made a motion ta adjourn. Brian Doyan seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. The meeting adjourned at 3.15 p.m. ~ ~ Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes April26, 1999