The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-0614 PECTHIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE W OF VAI THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE TOWNOAYAIL PUBLIC Ti IL Monday, Jane 1 , 1999 AGENDA roi ct Orientation l PEC LUNCH - Communitv vel t Dwartment MEMBERS PRESENT Site Visits 1, and - 331 Beaver Dam Circle 2. Antlers ® 630 West Lionshead Place C.-iver- George 12:00 p.m. 1:00 P.M. -T E: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the beard will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 .m. Hearina, i Cr 1 Chambers 1. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a Type 11 EHU, heated at 331 ever Dana Circle/Lot 1, Block , Vail Village 3`d Filings Applicant: and B. Development LL, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: Dominic auriello Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planners George Rather ?A 7V IWWN O VAIL d? MEMBERS ABSENT 1 4. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion and loading dock addition t the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 E. Lionsea Circle/Lot 1, lock 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Recreation District Planner: George other TABLED UNTIL JUNE , 28,1999 5. Information Update "Conflicts of Interest" -Torn Moorhead Approval o a 24, 1999 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information, 2 L---. , -i . . _'1 '91' p - ITAL a em-o ? TN 6 - )L PUBIL o e 1, June 14, 1999 ...w.. AEA r i ct _a _ -i / . e 'UNCH, - n - , el t Department, 12:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT 1. The approval is subject to Design Review Beard approval of the project. as 7VW VAI b? 1 20 A request for a major exterior alteration and variance for the number of required parking spaces, to allow for a residential expansion of 2 new condominiums, and 7 new employee housing units, located at 630 W. Lionsead Place (the Antlers)/ Lot lock 1, ions ea Third Filing. Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented Robert LeVine Planners George Ruther CTI : C __" r n Aasl nd SECOND: Chas Bernhardt VOTE: -0 WORIKSL?1_ -.J-NO 1 (voted to convert to worksession) 3m A request fora r si n of a proposal to amend the Town's "Public Accommodation Zone District," Chapter 7 and amendments to Chapter 15, Cross Residential Floor Area RFA), Town of Vail Municipal Code. Applicant- Johannes Faessler, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: George uther WORKSIESSION 4. A request for a final review of proposed locker room expansion and loading dock addition to the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 E. Lionsea Circle/Lot 1, dock 1, Vail Lionsea 2" d Filing. Applicant- Vail Recreation District Planner: George uter . Information date "Conflicts of Interest" -Tom Moorhead Approval of May 24, 1999 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 7 South Frontage Road, Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department MEMORANDUM, Applicant: are B. Development LL C, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: Dominic Mauriello - _ d DESCRIPTION T PR_' USE In September and December of 1992, the Town Council passed Ordinances and 27, Series of 1992, t create Chapter 12-10 (Employee Housing) which provides for the addition of Employee Housing Units (HUs) as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts. The definition in that ordinance stags: Section 1--2 The applicant is proposing a Type li employee housing unit in the secondary dwelling unit on this property and is 500 s q. ft. in floor area. It is located above the garage. The HU includes a single car garage. TO OF kYA1L 1116 STAFF C ' -- - - The Community Deve_apment Department recommends approval of this application for Type 11 Employee Housing nit, subject to the following findings: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of Section 2-1 (Employee lousing) an the purposes of the district i which the site is located. . That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of Section 12-18 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Vail Municipal Code. The recommendation of approval is also subject to the following condition'. The approval is subject to Design Review Board approval of the project. Please note that under Section 12-1 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the approval of a conditional use permit shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtains and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion, or the use for which the approval as been granted has not commenced within two years from when the approval becomes final. Ill. 'a_ si . I Lot Size: 42,000 sq. ft. Zoning: Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Standard Total RFA Prima Unit Secondary unit EHU Credit Parkin Required Site Coverage Allowed , 70 sole ft. n/a 2,765 s. ft. 500 sq. ft. 7 spaces 3,400 s. ft. 6,588 P roos[?e s . ft. 3,773 s q. ft. 2,765 s q. ft. I __-4. ft. 10 spaces (5 enclosed) 5,263 sq. ft. IV, CRITERIA AND FINDINGS, X Consideration of Factors: Before actin on a conditional use permit application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the factors with respect to the proposed use: - 2- \\VAIL\DATA\EViZYO \P C MOS\99\WAND.DOC 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development obiectives of the Town. . The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, pans and recreation facilities and other public facilities needs. Staff believes that there will be little impact from the proposed Type Il ELI on light, air, population, transportation, utilities, schools or parks. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. One additional vehicle is anticipated in association with this E . One enclosed parking space is proposed, along with one other parking space. Staff feels that this would be an insignificant intact on the above- referenced criteria. . Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surroundinq uses. The scale and balk of this proposed structure is very similar to those in existence in the surrounding neighborhood. Since the proposed employee housing unit will be located within the seconds residence, staff believes this EHU will not significantly impact the scale and bulk of this project in relation to surrounding uses. The subject property is zoned Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential. b. It shall be permitted only on lots which comply with minimum lot size requirements of the zone district in which the lot is located. -3- \\VAII..\DAI'A\EVERYONE\PEC OS\99\WAND.DOC At 42,000 square feet in size, this lot meets the minimum lot size requirements (15,000 square feet) in the Two-Family Residential zone district, This Type 11 EHU will be located within the propose secondary residence. However, it will maintain a separate entrance and will not be accessible from the interior of the secondary unit. The proposed EU will be a third dwelling unit on the site. It contains full kitchen and full bathroom facilities. The EHU will be 500 square feet in size. The proposed Type 11 U includes one living/bedroom and therefore complies with this requirement. 4- ',\VAIL\DATA`EVERYONE\P C\MEMOS\99\'V1 I7.DOC g. No more than two () adults and one (1) child not older than sixteen (1) ears of ae shall reside in a one (1) bedroom Tvoe 11 EHIJ. No more than two (2) adults and two (2) children not older than sixteen (1) ears of ae shall reside in a two (2) bedroom Tv e 11 EHU. Since this unit is a one-bedroom Type 11 EHU, the first section of this regulation will apply. in in i The Planning an Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit for an Employee Housing Unit: That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of Section 12-1 (Employ Housing) and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operate or maintains would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the proposed' use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of Section 12-13 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Vail Municipal Code. ®5_ \\VAIL\DAT"A\EV YONE\PEC\MEMOS\99\ D.DOC let SL908t 8F61EK CO LLA808AtBtl8 . e.aa..ee.., ARCHffWMRL 6°LANNING, IME b9ain® ba1B, f8tro H? fDw ' f80 Asv 0Rr OM- 4t SrtF 8Y t1 8f Vw a9 &-y ?4 I h- Na C-ew I br. T" . A1.0 rawrAscomw e i I a a OED .: r ?o,.r, 1 eye'.. .......... .,. .. aw,a?... ........ a a SQUARE FOOTAGE 5UI° MA Y LI ASS L R LEV%L OF. PIAYIO LEVEL 1,240 OP. UPPER LEVSL Sol of TOTAL 2,120 Off. E+d OF. GARAGE 304 OF. O E 624 O9. 0 /'?,?LOWER LEVEL FLOOR FLAN A3- O?ALE1 V4° . I.-®` Chit t i17?95 kIX T: 61? by. NIX Ir. OU- LIVINI ® FA o OF A3.0 MOICAu WOOD HEAPED DRIFT 0 -- -' (( p.i ?,W4LKWA?d" ®TA. ,, ", HEATED DECK ?.a k I T@E Sk1Q AT DESIGN COLLAR 4 D T! 1 taP, - mww Wk GO Hm0 6 4 W, 6 4aP, BA 61N9 Pd ReL?y Offi. sm. am® w ®eaa 0- off? 46r 6taKk.. Oar- 8 t. 4d a,4.4aYxafH " u1i I 597M fG 5ka X L ?NFR TF? I i E 0 A9] UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN &CA, c. W a V-W lJv....s A A :5618P. ¢3WI AAA 8Y. a E 0 781 8¢8017 ®1@101 COLLA801A71Vt ft N mG, *MRXM offi- VA Co L m m Dross a ma e eo mw xm r? fa D o am. fcrra .mm,rg w?.me e? S. ON- G?ae? xm ev m Rww- m 0 0 4 ----------------------- -------- Ili II II e, ? I,r-- i- r ------------- ?fl ,!F® -wv li III ill ?1 ? II .E III , i jl II 1? _®__ J I I I it IE 4? 1 1? ? ?---_ --°- ?,JI Ite Q III 11 e- M r it iln _.--- 6T Iil ? ICI ? ,i I' it ! 1 1 1 1 Iii I I I ! i ®1 ! ?._® ®®11 tl ;il III ? II I 1 %® wR it I i i , I I Y'? 1 6 C_._...®..-_r ?wa_ III II 1! III ? Bee If t'-_-_-lf I;I ?l 1i 11 4 Iil kl i I II tIj?l li II {Jd__ T II 1' _ III irm,l II I,I lil is l11 'il ?I it it i ?i; II it I '1 ? ;il Iii ??9:a i.R? it 1• I. 1 it II Ik 1 11 ? i,t Ili II i sx II v? jl II III f,i „ II I, ---------------- prf _ -_ _v-I,Br_® I,BII I,EII 1,911 tl®,I i,Eil IiBll 118,1 Bill 1 9 1 i r l i,lli Iipi Q,ROOP PLAN OG.AA.E1 11- . I-, f,,mR M MORE DESIGN C O I..1 BB Rd Y 1 Y8 ARCHMO -1, KMNINQ iN-m B a A b B9tl e? Off- -D-Z.: 1099 Weems Si , L G M199 SJ ! g ? a by •, A, @ a I 0 YSS 9490!4 0191CH C0LLA90[kPipS KAWW? 9£ INTUBM om- va, C% vrt .na r,aes m 4rt 8adtl @a 6 I,- ORS. p i Wwm, ? off- ?4 m9Mb. G taetY ?9rt atLtn.me5 pam et&BAAeH V g yi a Y ?I I MAIN 4k,VLL ?V-W LOUER LEVEL 0 NO TPEAST ELEVATION tCAL£e V4' . I'-W i' 5OUTHE5T ELEVATION Alm m bye Y4 -:7w wl" C Ys? a? D ?- I li,__- -L -- --- MAIN LEVEL T .' ... - . ... .? r°' g .. .....:9'°®°... . . ......._... ...._. .? _ ............. 1®°_1, UPPED LEVEL - .. ...._ e..---.(V ?.J'A .... ..... .. ....... .........„ .? ....f.... ... .........-.. / ,-",50UTWLJE5T ELEVATIC?N a NC) THWEST ELEVATION 1.fatUER LEVEL .. 0 B THE RESORT DESIGN COLLAIOIAYHYE RFCPUAf, om- BtANNikG, IPIifR xa?n YWI6° m ,??? sxa gag 4? W WtA D- Off? Wae Wsdfot Am6 9l? A. NIS, I i h ?) I-M DESCRIPTION THE REQUEST li. STAFF REC0I._.._..__..'__._,TI0N Staff would recommend that the Planning Environmental Commission approve the applicant's proposal, subject to the following findings: That the proposed location of the 24 new units, the employee housing units and the conference facility is in accordance with the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and the purposes of the Lionshea Mixed Use -1 zone district in which the site is located. . That the proposed location of the Antlers Condominiums and the 24 new units and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with the goals and recommendations of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 4. That the granting of the parking variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Lionshead Mixed Use --1 zone district. . That the granting of the parking variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity of the Antlers. 6e That there are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the parking variance that o not apply generally to other properties in the Lionshead Mixed Use -1 zone district. Staff's recommendation of approval is also subject to the following conditions., That the owner/applicant ensure that the utilities to this site are all placed underground for the entire length of the site prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the development. 2. The owr - rh Acant shall contribute 91,00 to the Town of Vail for the required off-site roat.' _ Pay improvements prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. . An easement shall be established that allows pedestrian-bicycle use of any sidewalk that encroaches on the subject property, prier to the issuance of a building permit. . The northsie pedestrian ramp shall be modified so it does not interfere with the sidewalk. 8. maintenance agreement shall be established that requires the applicant to maintain the landscaping on the Town owned parcel of land that is immediately east of the Antler's parcel, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. The building plans, rooftop mechanical plans, landscape plan, tree protection plans, and durnpster enclosure details shall be reviewed and approved by the DRB, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 1. The applicant shall improve the north bank of Gore Creek from the trees that are southeast of the swimming pool to the east parcel line by removing all debris and materials that have been dumped, and restoring the bank to an appropriate vegetative state. ?Ilw IV. COM. ?' _,,A OF EXISTING TO PROPOSED BUILDING Existing Units: Parking: 89 spaces units: Parking: 114 spaces V. C_®__e®m__t f The following is an analysis of applicable zoning provisions: Standard Allowed by LMU-1 Proposed Lot Area: in. 0.23 acres or 10,000 s q. ft. 1.19 acres or 51,336 sq. ft. Height: Ave 71', max 62.5' 36' to 74' Setbacks: 10' on all sides min 10', except for decks, etc Site Coverage: 70% or 36,265 s q. ft. 41 % or 20,963 s q. ft. Landscaping: 0% or 10,367 s q. ft. 22% or 11,133 s q. ft. including Tract A to east Parking: 5 spaces 25 spaces CHFA: 2.5:1 RFA per buildable site area Or 129,590 s. ft. 67,590 s. ft. Density: 33% increase or 93.1 units 9 units U = 0 density 7 units loading/Delivery: 1 berth required 1 berth I® -_ -,r--EE m . t "I . . . 5 EMPLOYEE HOUSING GENERATION ANALYSIS The staff analysis below indicates a recommended figure which was used in determining the employee housing needs of the Antlers Condominiums, A summary of the Employee Housing Generation Analysis is follows: Staff Recommended Calculations: The staff believes that the Antlers Condominiums will create a need for 9.6 (10) additional employees. Of the additional employees, at least 2.6 (3) employees (30%) will need to be provided deed-restricted housing by the developers. a) Multi-Family welling Units =24 units (,4/unit) = 9.60 employees Total = 9.60 employees ( 0.30 multiplier) = 2.88 new e__ - ? spending upon the size of the employee housing unit provided, it is possible to have up to two employees per bedroom. For example, a two-bedroom unit in the size range of 450 - 900 square feet, is possible of accommodating three to four employees. These figures are consistent with the requirements for the Type III employee housing units outlined in the Municipal Code. The applicant has proposed to provide a minimum of seven new employee housing units. These units are in addition to the two existing units. The units would be deed- restricted as Type III E U's, VII. 11- o . r _ f CRITERIA Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the Planning an Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed uses Relationship an impact of the use on development -)s of t To n® major development objective of the Town is the redevelopment and improvement of the Lionshead village. The proposal would help achieve this through the new addition, the facelift of the existing building, and improvements to the streetsca e, bike- ed path and landscaping. 2. f fi If -ir, Istri uth n L I Lion, tr- --r 3c ool-, ° ms g®p -e??:_- mam e®i ® c S ossae 6db n L. .._? 4 &gi&?P R. B®{,m4® e?® The proposed use should not have any significant negative effect on these factors. The mass and design of the proposal have been reviewed by the Design Review Board. The proposal should draw more users to the Llonshead Village. Access has been reviewed by the Public Works Department; and the applicant will have to contribute to the off-site roadway improvements fund. Utilities and schools should not be heavily impacted. And the bike-ped path would be improved by removal of the overhanging deck. f e -t on traffic, it rt.cular reference to congestion, E . Jve .m_-1 pedestri, ___ convenience, traffic fic j ccntr__, one :rf,, v l of snow frc streutz 0-1-au %mg art-;04 The proposal has been reviewed for its effect on transportation by the Public Works Department which has requested numerous changes to the proposal throughout the processing of the g -Acation. 4. Effect upon the L.L' c: t area i.. __m. ._J t_ _ i e __ use is to located, including t pie an bulk of r. e u in relation to urrcun in 1. That fi w s location the i= _-- ? .- nc with t purl _P this Title n t r;-- district i is t site is is . That the p. 1 l cath n of the use an t n iticn uncr- which it cull ' _° t c ' ° . ink will not - _ -irien i t- u -f , ur ^r t ri it ?w aki,ju or. :_ or - in the v.?im®aw,. t ®- . - _ u will c .it each the applicable -- vision:- - P this Title. Vi 1. VA. .1, '?LCRITERIA AND FIN---.. _ Before acting on a variance application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors: 1. Tf-r. ,a - r---4n variance to other existing or potential us is ma m3 The applicant is requesting a variance to allow for a reduction in the required number of parking spaces. According the Zoning Regulations, the applicant is required to provide 59 new parking spaces. The new spaces are for the 24 new condominiums and the employee housing units. The applicant has proposed to 7 degree 2. The _ -- "° t strict and literal interpretation and z-3rc nt o - i necessary achieve comi: ___--®-,i r i c® tL _. .aem1,-.` _ am- sit in t vicinity or to attain hic _ -8___-ves of this i--_ of special privilege. 3® The effect of the ,g variance li h distribution of population, trm. i _n traffic facilities, - Alic facilities ai _1 L_ ®_ s, a public saf t--. Staff does not believe that the requested parking variance will have any negative impacts on the immediate and surrounding areas. i in in s: T: ....'rig Environmental Commission s a-l i i_he --vin findings before c - itin rianc : 1. TN li- granting of the ?--r, --- -14 not constitute - :;-i rpecial r_ _,, inconsistent l- . a:.mso._1ions on other r-111- - a cla3 fie in the same distri 2. Ain oft variance will not detrimental tot public - , r welfare, or materially injurious to properties or in the vicinI 3. That the variance is arr-n- . ?x one or ore of the following reasons: a. T, - ;strict li' _---1 i n I 3t do or -_rce nt of th-- =c-- a _--'-'i-n _ wit in ractic - l -,milt or unra c,-r __? Q 4a -e,' I.,co sistent ®??? .. i oaf ctiv s of gills title. a I-erg r:_ _ a or extraord-, -- circa roc - or - --"ti r-- -- ®? the sc _-i ' r°-r "i,-it do L cal r:L. Ih r r .. the m.® ® .z. C. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by t owners of other properties in the same district. la .- - .-J MASTER L The -} ".-ant's proposal is scheduled for a final review by the Design Review Board on dnes-'ay, June 16, 1999. It shall b the role of the Design Review Board to insure that it complies with the architectural guidelines as outlined in the Plan. F:\EVE} PONE\PEC\MEMOS\99\ANTLR.614 I N r OMMEN TER 5 )_ET AALF MN AROU'?P ASV C'OP'E COBY S s xTI qtr -o°-® ,P"Dv do lj PLXCE Red, eiop t t e? R iA i Anti Figure _77-1 IONS ND FNGF, S-36 From Rob IMRY all L. V ng Is Q' I ed hU11 , S ' Y 3 t??°g rvLT L ?vDz? v?? ti Date: 5119®99 'N me: 3:46:34 P TedHuskeyfor oil Tt.E-nks very much, L General i r 680 W. Uonshead Ptace Vail, ` 1657 f70- ®R -1 9- = ? . -4146 fax t3 °l_ April 28, Fred ,'`? . Fred: ;, $ i letter shall serve as notice t the Town of ail r ti, encroach on the easement in question. L for Upper Regional tee Authority Date APR 29 '99 10.1J F-N HUBL1L bLNVIUt-(IM P tm?tJ7 Dr). (off to ?b?fe?P mb?? baa f',GG c? 680 .®.... .. ®?®.>.. .A= ...... ®.. ....®.. m4.®.? ..®.. m® ,.....,. ...ems«.®.. <®. ??.®e ?. W W. Lionshead Place 1 yam C 61657 -70-47G-2471 0.`0- 146E www.anUersvaii.com April 28, 1999 Tim Knowlton Public Service Company is fax #303-571-7877 Ti _ _ rLy is t 1, Lionshead r 'ilirt ° n o il$ Eagle County, Color, -). 1 -. an _, at the r 1.on inn Association r m_i a r -11 of o There is currently utility easement ai-ng the €_ are ni r. prop( li t es hick we would 1"-.-3 encroach in Lo it L r pe k - ;_ j 4 f®u signature and date, this l tt-, Ie L - _ _ _ T ) n it ® have your permission errs c'_. )n the - _: ii e . iti n. for lic s i .,r-try -97 Date APR 29 a88 10:13 PR PUBLIC SERVICE--7TH r"L303 571 7877 lU ')I`JYIJ47b4l 4b°SbJ '118LIC SERVICE A NEW CENPWPY gNWIE6 CQMPaANr April 29A 1999 Antlers at Vail Mr. Robert Levine 680 W. Lionshea Place Vail, 81657 Dear Mr. L.eVlne- Siting and Land Rights 530 15th Street, Sultt 700 Denver, Colorado 90202-A256 Telephone 303.571.7799 Facsimile 303.571 .7877 This letter is in connection with your request to encroach into the existing utility easement located along the lot line of Lot 3, lock 1, Lionshead 3' Films Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado - Pu l ; Service Company of Colorado (PS o) has reviewed your request and has n - i ans to the encroachment. I is understanding that you have had the facial-Les located and that you are mare of your responsibility t dig carefully if you need to excavate around the utility lines. Although PSCo does not abject to your proposal, you should be aware that PSo may need to gain access to the utility lines in the future- if the proposed encroachment needs to be removed in the course of gaining access to the lines, the costs associated with such removal may be passed on to the property owner. ** TOTAL PAGE.03 ** A l $' EASEMENT A T WEEREAS, Antlers At Vail . ("Owner") h requested permission for easement encroachment for the purpose of construction on the real property (within the utility easement) as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto. 'WHEREAS, ® Cablevision VII. Inc. (G6 T CI") is will to avant its permission for the aforementioned easement encroachment as outlined on the attached Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. otherefor°e, The Parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, legal representatives and signs agree as follows: I. Consent. The permission granted herein by TCI is not to be construed as a total grant or consent to the Owner for the requested easement encroachment. The Owner shall be responsible to obtain all additional consents, grants and permission from any and all entities which are entitled to the use of the utility easement. II. Ingress and Egress. TCI shall, at all times, maintain all rights of ingress and egress to the utility easement. III. Reuair. Mainten cem and Installation. TCI shall at all times reserve the right to repair, replace, or place; cable, conduit, pedestals, electronic equipment and/or other equipment deemed necessary (in the sole opinion of TCI) for the operation of TCI's business. INT. Damages. If it becomes necessary for TCI to perform work or cause work to be performed in the utility easement; TCI, its affiliates, employees or agents shall not be held liable for any d age(s) to the Owner's structures(s) or improvements that are built on or in the utility easement. VI. Noncomnli ce. If the Owner does not comply with the terms of this Agreement TCI shall reserve the right to withdraw the consent given here' and, at its option, remove or cause the removal of all structures or improvements placed by Owner thin the utility easement. Owner shall then be responsible to reimburse T CI for all expenses associated with said removal. VU. No T relied Waiver. Failure ofTCI to insist at any time on strict performance of any of the conditions, convents, terms or provisions of this Agreement or to exercise any option., right, power, or remedy contained here' shall not be construed as a waiver or a relinquishment thereof for the future. VIII. Attu ev's Fees. If Owner fails to perfo any of the to sw convents, aQr°ee eats or conditions contained in this Agreement and TCI places the enforcement of this Agreement, or any part thereof, in the hands of any attorney, or files suit upon same, Owner agrees to pay TCI's responsible attorney's fees. i i t i i d ? .. . A W,J d "" °1 ?.. t ?'> b `o a O ???? ?? ? ? .r?i4 x`'??-.. . ?°s F. .. ?? ??? . ._ ._._..?._a_ . __ , .?._.. __._n ._..a_ _t 3 1W. - • - - V k°a T = l www,antleravall.zom May 'to, 1999 Fred TC3 levi s n 1 fag #949-9-4138 Fred. Our property is tat Blcck 1$ Licnsheai? Sr FHing, Tawn of Vail, Eagle Count-y, Colorado. you may be s, at the t Condominium i ti are pla ni redevelopment our property. There i tsar ntl blitmv easement along the t and n ; ww t property lire which would like t enc."aach in i= your p r i Q n. Assuming that's correct, and we certainly ° ld agree to those : c=di i rt , could 1 t you to i and rein &.:hi ? With our aignatura and date, this letter shall spr th at we Haye your permission to a -? (.roach on t) 'r.,7,ti t t Tcwn f V it . rat i q tia Date Frog: Robert Levine To: George Ruther Date: dIU/9y game: ® ® I _ . _ m W 680 W. Lionsh a Place Vail, O F'357 970-476-2471 970-476-? 146 fax T: Town of Mail Staff, R, P and Town Council From: Robert Levine, General Manager Date: 6/1110 Subject: rulers 2000 Friends, www.antlersvaii.com ask that this would also apply t such details a spot elevations, radii an other details associated with the civil engineering plans. Again, w would not expect building permits t b issued until all aspects of those civil engineering lays t the requirements the Torn a determined Town of Vail staff. Thanks very much, FILE CW F 7 - ; Rob Levine General Manager Hers Condominium Association 680 West Lionshead Place Vail, Colorado 81657 IM Re: Public Works Department comments to be addressed Dear Rob, As promised, I a forwarding to you the comments received from the Toy of Vail Public Works Department. Once you have had an opportunity to review the comments, please contact race at 479-2145 to schedule a time to meet so we can go over each of the comments with the benefit of a highlighted set of plans. Many of the comments c be addressed on a building permit set of plans, prior to the issuance of a building permit- Other comments must be addressed pricer to appearing before the Planning & Enviro ental Co scion for a final review. 3. Please revise the site plan to meet minim sight distance requirements out of the east parking structure exit. The site plan been highlighted for reference. 4. Please show the pool decks modifications removing the decks encroachment onto the pedestrian path on the site plan. 5. Please provide written permission from the utility companies granting their approval to allow improvements to encroach upon the easement along the western property line. 6, Please revise the proposed Finish grading along die wcstern propcrt?' litre. Finish grades shall not excced 2:1. 7. Please provide top/bottom of wall finish grade elevations along the retaining on the west side of the building, g. Please provide additional spat elevations at the east exit frta the parking structure, The locations of the spot elevations highlighted on the site plan. The following issues it need to be addressed on the building permit set of plans: Cr DPAP Please provide a complete set of civil engineered plans of all roadway, drainage and strectsca e improvements. 'I°lic plans shad include roadway width of 28 feet flbwlinie to flowline (24 feet of asphalt plus 21 2 foot 'de concrete drain pans) and a 4 foot aide drains pan through the driveway access. 2. Please revise the A nip so that the north end of the ramp dues not encroach into the sidew ° Please provide a $65,000 financial contribution to the To for the off-site traffic and intersection improvements. Please provide a pedestrian easennent for those portions of property where the sidewalk encroaches upon private property. Again, please contact me once you have had opportunity to review each of the comments. I loath forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, George flu , AICI' Senior Planner To of 'Mail xce Greg Hall, Director of Public Works Applicant: Johannes Faessl r, represented by To Braun Planner: George Muter DESCRII " I"_®T 11. STAFF - _ a® _®n n TI As this is a worksassic.1, staff will not be providing a recommendation at this times. Staff will provide a staff recommendation at the time of a final review. A final review of the proposed amendments to the Public Accommodation zone district is scheduled for Monday, June 289 19990 t i9 FVAf III DISC'- I - =r I ISSUES The following issues were identified by the Commission at the May 24th meeting an reed further discussion.- Parking Requirement Options A concern as expressed by several members of the Commission that certain properties zoned Public Accommodation could not take full advantage of each of the proposed changes to the development standards, as the development standards of these properties were limited by the requirement for parking. As a result, the Commission requested staff provide alternatives for the parking requirements. As discussed during previous worksession meetings, the Town of Vail has received a rant from the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments to complete a parking study. The purpose of the parking study is to determine the appropriateness of the current parking requirements and identify opportunities for amending the requirements town- wide. Staff continues to believe that it is more appropriate to amend the parking requirements town-wide if in fact the results of the parking study suggest amendments, rather than create different parking requirements for each of the individual zone districts. Staff further believes that the proposed text amendments for the Public Accommodation zone district should not be put on hold to await the findings of the parking study. It may be a finding of the study that no changes to the parking requirements are necessary, thus, the positive benefits of the proposed tuts amendments would have only been unnecessarily delayed. Possible Parking Alternatives This concept would allow property owners to pay-in-lieu to the Town of Vail Parking Fund for those required parking spaces they can not physically provide on-site. 2. No Parking/No Building . No Parking/Building This concept is the direct opposite o the previously described. In this case, the parkin requirement could be waived by the Planning Environmental Commission if the applicant can demonstrate that the required parkins can not be physically provided on-site. Possible criteria for consideration of such a waiver might include, uses (au vs. du), proximity to a public parking structure, ability of the project to meet the development objectives of the Town, proximity and availability of public transit, demo/rebuild, etc. . Amend the Parking Requirement patios 5, Permit Off-site Parking This concept would allow property owners to meet the parking requirement off-site rather than require it be on-site. Most importantly, however, the parking would still be required to be provided. Implementation Options PLANNING AN ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION June 1, 1999 Minutes P Public rin . MEMBERS ABSENT; Diane Golden STAFF PRESENT: Russ Forrest Dominic Mauriello George Ruther Judy Rodriguez 2:00 e John Schofield called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a Type 11 EHU, located at 331 Beaver Dam Circle/Lot 1, look 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing. Applicant: W. and S. Development L LC, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: Dominic Mauriello Dominic auriello gave an overview of the staff memo. John Schofield asked if the applicant had anything to add. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes May 10, 1999 Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes May 10, 1999 Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes May 10, 1999 Bob Lazier said he had covered parking for the Lifthouse and the Arcade, but the whole community was changing, since vans were being used and thin, there was no use for the parking garage anymore. He said he would like to see parking for hotels be 2 spaces for every unit. He said he agreed with Johannes that the parking standard was not valid any longer. John Schofield closed the public input, since there were no further comments from the public. Rob Levine asked for this to become worksession and said they would revert their application to an SIDD. Tom Weber said there was an inherent hardship with this property. He said there was adequate parking for this project that was out of view and substantial benefits to the public such as bringing the Antlers up to compliance. He said he was not in favor of the parking pay-in-lieu, as there were no restaurants, etc., and he was not in favor of losing any EHU's. He said his straw vote was in favor of this project. Brian Doyon agreed with Tom. He asked about the off site road improvements and would like to know what the improvements were and that his straw vote was in favor, but to keep employee parking. Galen Aasland agreed with his fellow Commissioner's and said he was in favor of this since the employee housing was more than anyone else had proposed. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes May 10, 1999 3, request for ear ire of a proposal to amend the Town's "Public Accommodation Zone District," Chapter 7 and amendments to Chapter 15, Gross Residential Floor Area ( RR ), Town of Vail Municipal ode. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes May 10, 1999 the East Village quiet. He said that there have been mistakes and we have to stop, i.e., old Peak could have been 1 story higher. He said that more density doesn°t impact the area and we wanted to encourage developers. He suggested putting emphasis on the Eagle airport. Doug Cahill said he was comfortable with one PA. Chas Bernhardt agreed with one zone district. He said the majority of properties were already SDD's in that zone district. He said that this should reduce the SC process, and it was the lesser of two evils and it would control the overall growth . Tom Weber asked for an explanation on the current text regarding the 10% requirement for commercial, George other explained it. Tom Weber said parking was very important since it becomes an amenity, He asked, regarding the new zone district, if it seemed unfair when it didn't hit the mark for most of the properties already there. Brian oyon said he was in favor of this at the last meeting and he is in favor of it now. Galen Aaslan said he doesn't like the "no parking, no building" idea.. John Schofield advised the applicant to o forward with the changes and they would address parking down the road. He said he liked item ##4 and very well. He said that allowing flexibility would give lodge owners some latitude. 4. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion and loading dock addition to the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 E. Lio shead Circle/Lot 1, dock 1, /ail Lionshead 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Recreation District Planner; George Ruther TABLED UNTIL JUNE 28,1999 Galen Aasland made a motion to table item ##4 until June 29, 1999 Tom Weber seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of -0. 5. Information update ® "Conflicts of Interest" -Tom Moorhead (tabled until everyone present) George Rut her said Council expressed concerns with the temporary structure at VMS. He said Council wanted them to add temporary landscaping around the building and also amended it to a 1-year approval. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes May 10, 1999 Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes May 10, 1999