Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-0712 PEC. A request for the establishment of Special Development District No. 37 (Antlers), to allow for the construction of 24 new condominiums, 7 new employee housing units and a new parking structure level, located at 630 W. Lionshead Place (the Antlers)/ Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead Third Filings Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert LeVine Planner: George Rather . A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council of the Development Standards Handbook. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs 6. A request for a conditional use, to allow for the creation of a public park, located at Lots 1,2 & 3, Block H, Vail das shone /2497, 2435, 2467 Garmisch and the un latted portion of the SE 1 /4, SF 1 /2, S W '/a of Section 11, Township 5, Range 61 West. Applicants Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs 7. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion and loading dock addition to the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 E. Lionshead Circle /Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2" Filing. Applicant: Vail Recreation District Planner: George Ruther TABLED IL JULY 26,1999 8. A request for a minor subdivision, to vacate common lot lines to create a new lot, located at 2477, 2465, 2437, 2497 Garrnisch / Lots 1 -4, Block l-I, Vail Das Schone #2. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Nina Timm Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED TIL JULY 26,1999 9. A request for a variance from Section 12 -6D -6, to allow for a building encroachment into a rear setback, located at 2657 Arosa Drive / Lot 6 Block D, Vail Ridge. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs WITHDRAWN 10. Information Update 11. Approval of June 26, 1999 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage road. Please call 479 -2136 for information. Sign language interpretation available span request with 24 hour notification. Please nail 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published June 25, 1999 in the Vail Frail 3. That the owner/applicant obtain approval by the Town of detailed civil engineering drawings for all proposed improvements including roadway, streetscape and drainage improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit The streetscape improvements shall comply with the Lionshead Master Plan and extend from the Marriott property line to the bike-ped path between the Antlers and Lionsquare Lodge on Tract A. An easement shall be established that allows pedestrian- bicycle use of any sidewalk that encroaches on the subject property, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. The building plans, rooftop mechanical plans, landscape plan, tree protection plans, and dumpster enclosure details shall be reviewed and approved by the DRB, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. The applicant shall improve the north bank of Gore Creek from the trees that are southeast of the swimming pool to the east parcel line by removing all debris and materials that have been dumped, and restoring the bank to an appropriate vegetative state. 11. That the applicant contribute to the Town's Parking Fund for those required parking spaces not provided on-site. The contribution shall be made prior to the issuance of a building permit. 12. That the Town Engineer review and approve the proposed parking level plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. A request for a conditional use, to allow for the creation of a public park, located at Lots 4 M TO' Planning and Environmental Commission SUBJECT: A request for a major exterior «.a©n a conditional use permit to allow EHU's, conference facilities, and multi-family dwelling uses on the first floor of the building, and a variance from Section 12-10-10, parking requirement, to facilitate the redevelopment of the Antlers Condominiums at Vail, located © 680 W. Lions head PIJ Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 4th Filing. Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert LeVine Planner: George Ruther E 5e That the granting of the parking variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity of the Antlers. 2. The applicant shall provide a performance bond to the Town of Vail with the Town of `fail as the beneficiary in the amount of $72,300 to financially secure the applicant's proportionate cost for improvements to the east and west intersections of the South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle. The bond shall be established prior to the issuance of a building permit and the duration of the bond shall be for a period of 3 years from the date of building permit issuance. Should the intersection improvements not be commenced within the 8 year period the Town of Mail shall release the applicant and /or its successors of the financial obligation of the performance bond. 3. That the owner /applicant obtain approval by the Town of detailed civil engineering drawings for all proposed improvements including roadway, streetscape and drainage improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit The streetscape improvements shall comply with the Lionshead faster Flan and extend from the Marriott property line to the bike -ped path between the Antlers and Lionsuare Lodge on Tract A. 4. An easement shall be established that allows pedestrian - bicycle use of any sidewalk that encroaches on the subject property, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. The northside pedestrian ramp shall be modified so it does not interfere with the sidewalk. 6. The owner /applicant shall deed restrict the 9 Type III Employee lousing Units in accordance with the Zoning Regulations, prior to obtaining a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy on the project. 7. The southeast corner of the swimming pool deck shall be removed so that it does not overhang the bike -ped path. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Town that requires the sight distance and grading of the path around the pool to be improved within 5 years to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. 6. A maintenance agreement shall be established that requires the applicant to maintain the landscaping on the Town owned parcel of land that is immediately east of the Antler's parcel, prior to the issuance of a building permit. . The building plans, rooftop mechanical plans, landscape plan, tree protection plans, and dumpster enclosure details shall be reviewed and approved by the R, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. The applicant shall improve the north bank of Gore Creek from the trees that are southeast of the swimming pool to the east parcel line by removing all debris and materials that have been dumped, and restoring the bank to an appropriate vegetative state, 11. That the applicant contribute to the Town's Parking Find for those required parking spaces not provided on -site. The contribution shall be made prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3 12. That the Town Engineer review and approve the proposed parking level plans prier to the issuance of a building permit, III. PROS & CONS The proposal will enhance the Lionshead village economically by providing more units that will bring more people. The appearance of the village will be enhanced by the upgrading of the existing building and by the addition of the new building which meets current design guidelines. The redevelopment will act as a catalyst for other property owners in the village to upgrade their properties. On the other hand, the appearance of the existing building is not being improved significantly. The new addition could affect adjacent properties by impacting their views and sunlight. And the proposal does not include any accommodation units, although the condominiums are often rented out. . COMPARISON OF EXISTING TO PROPOSED BUILDING Existing Proposed Total Units: Units: Units: 70 condos 24 condos 94 condos E HU's 7 EH U's 9 E H U's RFA: 52,640 sf CRFA: 34,950 sf GRFAe 67,590 sf Site Coverage: Site Coverage: Site Coverage: 6,971 sf 12,012 sf 20,693 sf Parking: 39 spaces Parking: 56 spaces Parking: 145 spaces V® ZONING ANALYSIS The Lionshead Mixed -Use District (L U -1) was recently adopted by the Town Councils Afterwards, the applicant requested that this proposal be reviewed under the LMU -1 provisions. The proposal includes the following new uses which require approval of a conditional use permit: Use Floor per Plans Zoning Fier Description Employee housing units (EHU) 1,2,3 basement, basement, first Conference facilities 3 first Multi - family dwelling units 3 first 4 Height 71', max 32.5' 36' to 74' Setbacks; 10' on all sides min 10', except for decks, etc Site Coverage: 70% or 36,235 sq. ft. 41 % or 20,933 sq. ft. Landscaping: 20% or 10,367 sq. ft. 22% or 11,133 sq. ft. including Tract A to east The figures identified in the Housing Report are based on surveys of commercial -use employment needs of the Town of Vail and other mountain resort communities. For comparison purposes, Telluride, Aspen and Whistler B.C. all have employment generation ordinances requiring developers to provide affordable housing for a percentage of the new employees resulting from commercial development. New employees are defined as the incremental increase in employment needs resulting from commercial redevelopment. Each of the communities assesses a different percentage of affordable housing a developer must provide for the new employees. For example, Telluride requires developers to provide housing for 40% (0.40) of the new employees, Aspen requires that 0% (0.60) of the new employees are provided housing and Whistler requires that 100% (1.00) of the new employees be provided housing by the developer. In comparison, Vail has conservatively determined that developers shall provide housing for 15°x® (0.15) or 30% (0.30) of the new employees resulting from commercial development. When a project is proposed to exceed the density allowed by the underlying zone district, the 30% (0.30) figure is used in the calculation. If a project is proposed at, or below, the density allowed by the underlying zone district, the 15% (0.15) figure is used. The Antlers development proposal exceeds the density permitted by the underlying zone district, and therefore, the 30% figure shall be used. EMPLOYEE I GENERATION ANALYSIS The staff analysis below indicates a recommended figure which was used in determining the employee housing needs of the Antlers Condominiums. A summary of the Employee Housing Generation Analysis is as follows Staff Recommended Raggkgalotrlaiorta The staff believes that the Antlers Condominiums will create a need for 9.6 (10) additional employees. Of the additional employees, at least 2.8 (3) employees (30%) will need to be provided deed - restricted housing by the developers. a) Multi- Family Dwelling Units =24 units (.4 /unit) = 9.60 employees Total = 9.60 employees (X 0.30 multiplier) = 2.88 new Icy s Depending upon the size of the employee housing unit provided, it is possible to have up to two employees per bedroom. For example, a two - bedroom unit in the size range of 450 - 900 square feet, is possible of accommodating three to four employees. These figures are consistent with the requirements for the Type III employee housing units outlined in the Municipal Code. The applicant has proposed to provide a minimum of seven new employee housing units. These units are in addition to the two existing units. The units Mould be deed- restricted as Type III EHU's. 6 Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, ,s,iit*-mnfivc% :;.44 nPV,—,tri,2-,t q-ifptv s—ad. rAtnvPniPrtrP- 2,nd — . That the ro ose location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the ro ose use will comply with each of the applicable provisions oft is Title. ill. VARIANCE CRITERIA 1 1 Before acting on a variance application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors, 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow for a reduction in the required number of parking spaces. According the Zoning regulations, the applicant is required to provide 56 new parking spaces. The new spaces are for the 24 new condominiums and the employee housing units. The applicant has proposed to provide 25 spaces. The applicant believes that 25 new spaces in addition to the 89 existing spaces will meet the needs of the entire project. Staff believes that given the proximity of the Antlers Condominiums to the ski yard, the retail shops and restaurants in Lionshea, the easy access to the town bus system and the availability of the regional airport in Eagle, the 114 structured parking spaces will meet the needs and intent of the parking requirement. Additionally, given the existing nature of the building and the development on the site, staff believes the applicant is severely limited in terms of providing all the parking on the site unless a demo /rebuild were proposed. 2. The e ree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation an enforcement f a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. Staff has reviewed the plans to determine if an alternate parking structure configuration could be proposed. used upon our review, staff believes that the applicant has maximized the parking structure to the extent possible. The structure has been designed to meet the minimum requirements necessary to insure adequate traffic flow and ease of vehicle operation. Staff believes that the applicant is requesting the minimum amount of deviation necessary from the parking space requirements to achieve the intended objectives without resulting in a grant of special privilege. 3. The effect oft the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities public facilities and utilities and u licsft. June 22, 1999 The Lionshead Master Plan and enabling ordinances discuss the need to assess for the construction of specific reasonable off - site improvements related to specific developments. The Master Plan has identified close to $15 million in Frontage Road improvements from the main vail roundabout to Cascade Village. This is a distance of approximately 7300 ft. and will contain approximately ten major intersections. The Town has requested from the Colorado Department of Transportation, $5 million to provide these improvements. The Town of Vail is prepared to pay an additional $5 million for the project. The remaining $5 million is assumed to directly be attributable to the ten intersections equaling $500,000 per intersection. Those developments accessing the two intersections of Vest Lionshead Circle will be contributing to the improvements of these two intersections. In order to determine, at this time, the attributable number of trips to each intersection, the combined trips of both intersections were determined® The Traffic Study for the Lionshead Master Plan shows an increase of vehicle trips at both intersections of 127 trips in the a.m. peak period for a total of 640 trips and an increase of 195 trips in the p.m. peak period for a total of 795 trips. The Antlers® proposal expands an existing meeting room and adds 7 new EHU`s in the existing building. The change of uses within the existing building was not looked at as affecting the final numbers in the Master Plan. The addition to the project adds 24 new units. The Saturday peak hour factor, an average of both peak periods, is .738 trips /Dwelling Unit (DU). 24 DU`s times .738 = 17.7 new trips. This equals 17.7/195 x100 = 9.2.%of the total new peak hour trips at the two intersections. 9.1aof $1,000,000 is $91,000. This is the amount the Antlers owes for improvements to the frontage road. The Town has agreed to 800 of $91,000, which equals $72,800, Note: Detailed costs of the intersection are not known at this time. As more accurate costs become available, the contribution can be adjusted. If a TIF mechanism is established which off sets the developers contribution, then if this development contributes significantly to the TIF, those contributions can be credited toward the payment. If a special assessment district is established payments toward improvements can be credited toward the assessment. hua4t= TO. Planning and Environmental Commission FROM Community Development Department SUBJECT: A request for a Type 11 EMU, located at 265 Forest Road / Lot 21, Block 7, Vail Village 1" Filing Applicant. Mitchell Studio, LLC, represented by Steve Riden Planner: Allison Ochs I - in September and December of 1992, the Town Council passed Ordinances 9 and 27, Series of 1992, to create Chapter 12-13 (Employee Housing) which provides for the addition of Employee Housing Units (EHUs) as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts. The definition in that ordinance states'. The recommendation of approval is also subject to the following condition: 1 . The approval is subject to Design Review Board approval of the project. 9 � 1 Standard Allowed Proposed Total GRFA 5 995 sqo ft. 6,201 sq. ft. Primary Unit 3,212 sq. ft. 3,313 sq. ft. Secondary unit 2,283 sq. ft. 2,388 sq. ft. EHU Credit 500 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft. Parking Required 6 spaces 6 (EHU space is enclosed) Site Coverage 5,044 sq. ft. 5,044 sq. ft. To conform with regulations not pertaining to the EHU, the proposed residence will change slightly prior to Design Review Board approval. IV. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Consideration of Factors: Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the factors with respect to the proposed 1 IBellationship and impact of the use on the dgyqLq���� Town. When the Town Council adopted the Town of Vail Affordable Housing study on November 20, 1990, it recognized a need to increase the supply of locals/employee housing units. The Town encourages EHUs as a means of providing quality living conditions and expanding the supply of employee housing for both year-round and seasonal local residents. The 0 proposed unit will have a positive impact on the Town's rental housing needs. 2. The effect of the use on liqht and air, distribution of Aa 0 U' tip transportation facilities, utilitiesscho d recreatio facilifie ,..ols, parks an and other Dublic facilities needs. "1 110 *ago== grMILIWIMM 17 1 1,111 1 � One additional vehicle is anticipated in association with this EHU. One enclosed parking space is proposed. Staff feels that this would be an insignificant impact on the above-referenced criteria. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to located, includinq the scale and bulk of Me proposed use in relation The scale and bulk of this proposed structure is very similar to those in existence in the surrounding neighborhood. Since the proposed employee housing unit will be located within the secondary residence, staff believes this EHU will not significantly impact the scale and bulk of this project in relation to surrounding uses. M M, I M a 13 The proposed Type 11 EHU includes one living room and one bedroom and therefore complies with this requirement. Since this unit is a one-bedroom Type 11 EHU, the first section of this regulation will apply. N h. Each Ty e Il EHU shall be required to b y no less than one � parking space for each bedroom located therein. However if a one 41 bedroom Type Il EI�IJ exceeds six undre600� square feet, it shall have two {2) parking spaces. All arkin spaces required by this Code shall be located on the same lot or site as the EHIJ. If no dwelling exists upon the pro arty which is proposed for a Type 11 EAU at the tirrte a building permit is issued, or if are existing dwelling is to be demolished and replaced by a new dwelling, not less than one 41) of the parking spaces required by this paragraph shall be enclosed. 300 square feet credit shall be allowed for the construction of one enclosed parking space for the Type ll EHQ. Since this project is a demolition /rebuild, the applicant must provide one enclosed parking space for the proposed EHU. One enclosed parking space is proposed. B . Eindingsa The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit for an Employee Housing Unit: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of Section 12-13 (Employee Housing) and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. . That the proposed use would comply with each of the a provisions of Section 12 -13 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Vail Municipal Code. N • 4 FAE\IERYONE\PEG \MEMOS \99 \phillips.cioc i enforcement of a specified regulation compatibility and uniformity tn i, k wa c nf thic fitin n , i, r . _. i0 ., _ nrivilown F:\EVERYON E \PEC \MEMOS \99 \phiiiips.doc 2 r� I fill in below xi fi c garage • • � � , °3 � C a ��` .- ©«/ � ���� \\ +: ne, i ,``1 � ; g5 �� � ��+ MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE; July 1, 1999 RE: A recommendation to Town Council on the adoption of the proposed Town of Vail Development Standards handbook. Applicant. Town of Vail Planner- Allison Ochs Town Council, as applicable. The Town's annual community survey indicates long held U&MULIVIUM Aulaulk ZIWAU� Both customers and Town staff experience frustration with the application of unwritten standards and conflicts between existing codes. Standards for the development of property in the Town of Vail are codified in numerous sections of the Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code, the Uniform Fire Code and other documents adopted by reference in the Municipal Code. Some of these standards are unclear and have required "interpretations" by Town of Vail staff over the 11 0 years. Our customers need to have a clear understanding of development and design standards in order to obtain approval in an efficient manner. 2. Consolidate, clarify, and define development standards so that both Town staff and customers have a clear understanding of what is required in order to build or redevelop in the Town of Vail. ® Educate the users of the process on the need to accept responsibility for providing complete and accurate submittals and required revisions in a timely manner in order to fully benefit from the Development Review Process improvements. The following are the GIVENS for the DRIP effort; 1. Existing Staff Interpretations and unwritten requirements will be eliminated or codified as part of this process. 2. Staff will seek, and is committed to, continuous improvement in inter - departmental coordination and cooperation to promote efficiencies in the Development Review Process. 3. Requirements and standards required for the general health and safety of the community will not be compromised through this effort. 4. The Town of Vail encourages and seeks public involvement in the clarification of development standards and improvement of the Development Review Process. 5. The Town Council will have the final decision making authority on adoption of any Municipal Code modifications required to implement DRIP. 1 A statement was added to p. - "To encourage redevelopment, there shall be some flexibility grant. d to existing nonconforming sites and structures. However, wherever possible, compliance with the Development Standards shall be achieved." 2. On pat, "Administration" a statement was added so that it now reads "Such administrative changes, made by the Town Manager, to these regulations shall be approved by the Town Council annually or as necessary. . "Water features" was removed from the definitions of "landscape area" and "landscaping" on p. 6 and r. . On p, 12 "Residential Access and parking Standards," the requirement that turn- around area be supplied when the driveway length is greater than ' has been removed. 5m On p. 1, a sentence has been added to "surfacing" stating "double track driveways are permitted." 6e The critical root zone requirement for shrubs and bushes has been removed on pe 16m 7n O n p. 19, a P. E. Stamp is required for bench of combination walls. No changes have been made to the Design Review Chapter, as this chapter will be reviewed in its entirety in the near future, A Town of Vail Development Stanclartls Handbook . Administration ................................ 9... ...............9............... . 9....................... ..............................2 2 . Defnitions ...................................................................................................... ..............................4 3. Residential Access, Driveway and Parking Standards .............................. ............................... 1 Table 1: Driveway/Feeder Road Standards... ......... ..................................... ....... ........... ] 1 "fable 2: Residential Access and Parking Standards... __ . ..... ......... .... — ............... ...... __ ...... 12 . Residential Fire Department Access Standards .......................................... .............................14 Table 3: Residential Fire Department Access Standards . ... ............... ..... ........... ..... — ...... ....... — ........ ..... — 1.4 5. Parking Lot and Perking Structure Design Standards For All Uses .......... .............................15 Table 4: Parking Lot Design Standards. .............. ....... ................. ........... __ ...... ....... 15 . Grading Standards ...................................................................................... ..............................1 Table 5: Grading Standards... ....... - ... ...... ........... ......... ......... ....... ........... __ ..... ____ ................... 18 Table 6: Critical Root Zone ..... .............. ....................................... ..................................... ............. — ...... 18 Table 7: Retaining Walls ................ .....:.. ............................... ................ 19 7 Geologi c/Environmental Hazards ................................................................ .............................20 Table8: Geologic Hazards .............. ___ .......... .... .. ... ..... ........ — .................. ............. . .............. ....... .. .... ,... 20 . Summary of Zoning Setback and Development Limitations ...................... .............................21 Table 9: Summary of Zoning Setback and Development Limitations ......................... ............................... 21 . Grass Residential Floor Area ( RFA) ........................................................ ..............................2 Table 10: GRFA Requirements by Zone District ......................... ........... ___ ........ ____ .............. — .......... 24 10. Design Review Standards and Guidelines ................................................ .............................25 11 Details ....................................................................................................... ..............................3 L Driveway Standards Widths, Flares, and Cross Slopes ......................................... ............................... 39 1 Driveway Standards — Cross Over Widths .............................................................. ............................... 40 3, Driveway Standards —Sight Distance Regulations.. .... .......... ..... ___ ......... - 41 4. Driveway Standards — Residential Driveway Grades ............................................... ............................... 42 5. Driveway Standards — Minimum Driveway Entrance Angles .................................. ............................... 43 6. Driveway Standards — Maximum Driveway Grade Breaks . .............. ................... ........... ..... — .... ............ 44 7. Single Family, Two Family, Primary /Secondary Minimum Centerline Turning Radius . .............. ........ — 45 8. Minimum Distance from a Public Road to Private Obstruction ... ........................... .... ... ..... .... ....... ....... — 46 9. Minimum Residential Fire Department Staging Area .............................................. ............................... 47 10. Retaining Wall Standards — Combination Walls .................................................... .............................48 12 Index ......................................................................................................... ..............................4 • 2 Town of Tail Development Standards Handbook Adoption "Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook," was adopted by Town Council on a Town of hail Development Standards Flandbook Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook Critical Root Zone: Area critical to existing vegetation to ensure Its existence. Cross-Over (switch -back or 'Turn)® The area on a driveway where the t ing angle of the centerline of the driveway curvature is 9 ° or greater. Cross-Over Aisle® The drive aisle where a 90 °or greater turn is required by a vehicle to change drive aisles. Curb-Cut: The location where a driveway, parking area, or feeder road connects to a public street or feeder road. Deck Setback (groan lever® A line or location within a lot or site which establishes the permitted location of an at -grade (within 5' of grade) deck or patio on a lot. Deck Setback (Trot ground level): A line or location within a lot or site which establishes the permitted location of an above grade (greater than 5' above grade) deck or balcony on a lot, Demo/Rebuild: The destruction, demolition, fifty %) 0 or removal of percent (50 or more of the gross residential floor area of an existing dwelling unit or structure, The determination of the fifty percent (50 %) shall be calculated upon "gross residential floor area " as defined in Title 12, Zoning Regulations. Density: The number of dwelling units allowed per lot or the number of dwelling units allowed per acre: Design Review Board ( ): The body responsible for reviewing development proposals in the Town of Vail. The Resign Review Board focuses on evaluating projects based on the Town Code, Master Plans, and the Design Standards as set forth in the Town Code, including architectural design, site planning, landscaping, site disturbance, etc. Disturbed Arum Any area where grading takes place. Driveway: A paved all - weather driving surface on private property which provides access to 3 or fewer dwelling units (including EHUs). Driveways generally provide access to individual dwelling units. Driveway Pan: A concrete drainage structure which conveys water; located where a driveway or feeder road connects with the public street. 5 Town of Tail Development Standards Handbook Lot Size: The required size of a buildable lot or site. Permanent Slope Protection Measures: Used on slopes to permanently stabilize the slope and prevent erosion. P.E. Stamped Design: A design that is stamped, signed, and dated by a professional engineer. Retaining all® Any slope greater than 1;1. Town of Viail Development Standards Handbook Setback; The distance from a lot or site line, creek or stream measured horizontally to a line or location within the lot or site, which establishes the permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site. Setback Area: The area within a lot or site between a lot or site line and the corresponding setback line within the lot or site. Setback Linea A line or location within a lot or site which establishes the permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site. Setback Lille, Front: The setback line extending the full width of the site parallel to and measured from the front lot or site line, Town of Vail Developinent Standar& Handbook- Square Area: The area required to be accommodated completely within a lot's boundaries in order for the lot to be buildable; expressed as a square. Staging Area; A dedicated or designated space that is intended for use by the Fire Department, sufficiently large enough to provide for adequate operation. Street, Private; Any street not dedicated to the public for purposes of vehicular or pedestrian use. Temporary Grading: Grading performed to accommodate construction. Temporary Slope Protection Measures: Used on slopes to reduce erosion and assist in reestablishing vegetation. Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook 3. Residential Access, Driveway and Parking Standards This section (Fables 1 and 2) specifies the access, driveway and parking standards for residential development. These standards are subject to all conditions and exceptions described herein. These standards shall be considered the minimum standards. When two or more standards conflict, the more restrictive standard shall apply, Table 1: Driveway /Feeder Road Standards Single-family, Two- family, _ — Primary /Secondary Multiple Family Multiple Family Standard - access to not more than 3 dwelling units - access to 4 to 1I dwelling units - access to more than I1 dwelling units (including EHUs) - feeder road only - feeder road only - structures and all portions thereofwithin 150' from edge of street avement j Driveway /Feeder Road Sin. width 12' 20' 22' Normal - Access from feeder road to units - Access from feeder to units shalt (Detail 1) shall comply with single- family comply with single - family requirements contained herein requirements contained herein Min. Width 15' 24' 24' 90' corner (cross -over) (Detail 2) Sin. width 16' 24' 28' Entrance /Curb -cut (flare to 16') (flare to 24' with I0' curb- return (flare to 28` with 15' curb - return radius) Detail 1) radius) Max. Width 24' head in 36' 36' Entrance /Curb -cut 48' back out (Detail 3 Sin. Grade 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Centerline (I?etail 4 Max. Grade 10% unheated 9% unheated 9% unheated Centerline 12% heated 12% heated 12% heated (Detail 4) 16% heated and engineered with flat recovery areas Max. Grade 7% unheated 8% unheated 8% unheated Centerline 12% heated 12% heated 10% heated Corner /Cross -over (Detail 2) Max. cross -slope grade 8% 8% 8% (Retail 1) Entry angle 45° 70" 70° min. deflection for first 30' of driveway length Detail 5) Max. centerdne breads- 14% 6% 4% over grade (Retail 6) Max. grade at edge of 8"% 6'% 4% public road asphalt (Detail 4) Max. length of max. 10' 15' 30' grade at edge of public road asphalt (Detail 4 Sin. centerline turning 20' 30' 40' radius (Detail 7) Town of Vail Development Standardy Handbook V n Table I Residential Access and Larking, Standards Min. horizontal 24' N/A N/A clearance between garage doors (parallel to road) to edge of public street pavement (Retail 3) Min. horizontal 5' 5' 5' clearance between required parking space and edge of public street or feeder road aveerteni Min, horizontal N/A 2' from obstructions 5' from obstructions clearance from feeder 5' from buildings 10' from buildings road to structures / obstructions (e.g., guardrails, trees, retaining walls, etc.) (Detail $) Parking space size 9'x 19' surface See Table 4, See Table 4, Commercial/Multiple- 9'x 18' enclosed Commercial /Multiple- Family Family Parking Lot Standards Parking Lot Standards Sight distance triangle Forward Movement: 10' perpendicular x 10'perpendicular x 250' lateral 10' perpendicular x 250' lateral (strict (Detail 3) 250' lateral (strict compliance may not be compliance may not be required on sites Backward Movement: 15' perpendicular required on sites not able to not able to physically comply) x 250' lateral physically comply) (strict compliance may not be required on sites not able to physically comply) Back-out/Turn-around 12' wide Back -out into right- of-way Back -out into right -of -way prohibited area 20' centerline radius prohibited (Detail 7) Designed for 3 point turn or less Car turn- around area: Turn- around area: 12' wide Required when: 12' wide 20' centerline radius cross -over angle is greater than 120 °; 20' centerline radius Designed for 3 point turn or less entry angle is less than 70 °; Designed for 3 point turn or less Truck turn- around area: accessing a collector, arterial, or Shall be designed so trucks exit site commercial street; or forward as determined by traffic engineer - backout sight triangle requirement is not based on uses proposed. met. Driveway Pan , T wide concrete pan at edge ofasphalt for 4' wide concrete pan at edge of 8' wide concrete pan at edge of asphalt (I)rainae) the full width driveway pavement asphalt for the full width driveway for the full width driveway pavement (Detail 1) including returns pavement including returns including returns Town of`Vail Development Standards Handbook Surfacing All parking areas shall be an improved paved surface. Heated Drives Any heated portion of the drive heated within the right-of-way must be in a separate zone. The 4' concrete pan cannot be heated. Snow Storage All required parking and access areas shall be designed to accommodate on -site snow storage (i.e., within boundaries of lot and not within the right -of -way). Turf areas and other areas without trees may be utilized for this purpose. Unheated Drives: A minimum functional area equaling 30% of the paved area shall be provided contiguous to the paved area and designed to accommodate snow storage. .Pleated gives: A minimum functional area equaling 10% of the paved area shall be provided contiguous to the paved area and designed to accommodate snow - storage. Guard Rails Steep slopes adjacent to vehicular access ways and/or driveways without a proper shoulder may require the installation of a vehicular guardrail. The design and type of vehicular guardrail for private properties shall be designed by a registered Colorado Professional Engineer. Vehicular guardrails on public roadways or protecting the travelling public shall meet the standard. of the Town of Vail. 13 C7 Standard Single- Family, Two - Family, Primary /Secondary, and Multiple Family - requiring on -site Fire Department access (structures or portions thereof greater than 150' from edge of street pavement) Min. pavement radii for fire truck 1. For structures with the highest floor level 30' or less in elevation from staging access and min. pavement cross- area: over width 29' inside radius (including curb -cut accessing site) 44' outside radius 3b' centerline radius 20' cross -over width 2, For structures with the highest floor level greater than 30' in elevation from staging area: 31' inside radius 48' outside radius 40' centerline radius 22' cross -over width Mote: The 'Town of Vail reserves the ric it in unique circumstances to utilize a computer modeling techni ue to determine radii needed for access. Turn- around area Required if Fire Department staging area is 150' or more from edge of roadway pavement. Min. on -site Fire Department 1. For structures with the highest floor level 30' or less in elevation from staging staging area area: (Retail 9 ) 12° wide and 35' long pavement area 32' wide useable clear area inclusive of paved area The staging area must be located less than the minimum distance required to reach all areas of structures using a 150' eurvilinear line with a minimum radius of 8'. 2. For structures with the highest floor level greater than 30' in elevation from staging areas 12' wide and 50' long pavement area 32' wide useable clear area inclusive of paved area The staging area must commence a maximum of 20' from the face of structure. If the Fire Department makes the determination that access standards cannot physically be met, the structure must be sprinklered in accordance with Fire and Building Codes. 14 Angle of Minimum Minimum Minimu aricin s ace One-way drive aisle TL21 -wa drive aisle i'arl�in sell sire asrd cteararrce 0 (parallel) 12' 22' 9'x 24' 45 12' 22' 9'x 19' surface Tx 18' enclosed 8'x 16' compact (up to 25% of required parking in lots with more than 15 parking spaces and clearly marked as such) 7' height clearance for enclosed arking 60 16' 24' 9'x 19' surface 9'x 18' enclosed 8'x 16' compact (up to 25% of required parking in lots with more than 15 parking spaces and clearly marked as such) T height clearance for enclosed parking 75 22' 24' 9'x 19' surface 9'x 18' enclosed 8'x 16 compact (up to 25% of required parking in lots with more than 15 parking spaces and clearly marked as such) T height clearance for enclosed sarking 9° 24' 24' 9'x 19' surface 9'x 18' enclosed 8'x 16' compact (up to 25% of required parking in lots with more than 15 parking spaces and clearly marked as such) T height clearance for enclosed parking Cross -over drive 18' 24' n/a aisle Drive aisle with 12' 22' n/a no parking Min. opening for 12' 20' ma a parking structure entrance • 15 Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook Other Requirements: 16 Town of Vail Develovinent Standards Handbook Table 5: Grading Standards Grading Standard I Additional Review or I P.E. Stamp Approval Reaired� Temporary Grading Standards Grade 2' away from the 3' vertical then 2:1 Staff Review No deepest and furthest structural maximum member to day light Greater than 3' vertical Staff Review Yes and/or steeper than 2:1 Permanent Grading Standards Maximum Finished Grade 2:1 Staff Review No Temporary Slope Protection 3:1 - -2:1 Staff Review No Required Permanent Slope Protection 2:1 -1:1 DRB or Staff Review Yes 16 Critical Root Zone Trees A radius equal to one foot for each inch of caliper measured F above the natural grade 16 Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook Table 7: Retaining Walls Location or Type Maximum Height Additional Review P.E. Stamp 0r A r oval jp_ e sired Regular Walls 0-4' Staff Review or DRB No (Detail 10) 4 Staff Review or DRB Yes Bench of combination walls 4' or V2 the difference of Staff Review or DRB Yes (Detail 10) exposed height Right-of-Way 0-3 Staff Review or DRB No 3 Staff Review or DRB Yes 6' + Staff Review or DRB Yes PEC Setback (10' from paved surface NA Staff Review or DRB Yes and 2' from adjacent property lines) PEC In Front Setback 0-3' Staff Review or DRB No On slopes greater than 30% and 3-6' Staff Review or DRB Yes related to access C U 19 Town of Vaal Development Standards Handbook Other Requirements; Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook Zone Districts Max, ETU Mill, Mitt. Deck Min. Deck Msx. Max. Site Min. Min. Lot Size Min. Min. Max. Building Parking a ad Loading Density Allowance Building (ground level) (not ground Architectural Coverage Landscape (buildable area) Frontage Square lieight Location Hillside use Setbacks Setback level) Setback Projection Area Area Residential setback setback Tito Setback ShT2 1 unit per Type Ii per Residential Districts May project not May project not 4' 20 °/ 60 2,500 s. f. T3R 1 unit per i "hype V 20' front May project rot May project not 4' f S 70% 21.780 s. f. 50' 80' x 80' 30' flat roof See Title 12 Chapter 10 • lot per Iot as a 1? rear more than the more than the 33' sloping roof Municipal Code permitted 15' si des lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or'/ Hillside use %the required the required Residential setback setback ShT2 1 unit per Type Ii per 20' front May project not May project not 4' 20 °/ 60 2,500 s. f. 30' 80' 30' flat roof See "Title 12, Chapter 10, lot lot as a 15' rear more than the more than the 33' sloping roof Municipal Code conditional i >' sides lesser of 10' or lesser of5' or'/ Single Family use Y the required the required Residential setback setback It & P/S 2 units Type IT per 20' front M roject not ay May project not 4` 20% 60% 5,000 s.f 30' 80' x 80' 30' flat roof See Title 12, Chapter 10, Two- Fatally per lot Iot as a 15' rear more than the more than the 33' sloping root' Municipal Code Residential & conditional IS sides lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or Two Family use Y the required the required Primary/ setback setback Secnnda RC 6units Type III 20' front May project not May project not 4' 25 °/u 60 % 15,000 s. f 30' 80' x 80' 30' flat roof No parking in front setback. per acre Type R I5' rear more than the more than the (min. 8,000 .f 33'slopingroof as a 15' sides lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or'/ buildable area) At least t parking space per unit Residential conditional ; the required the required shall be located within the main Cluster use setback setback building(s) o r accessory garage. I I)MF 9 units Typc IIT 20' front May project not May project not 4' 35% 40% Q 000 s. t 30' 70 7 78 0' 35' flat roaf No parking in front setback. per acre Type IV 20'rear more than the more than the 38' sloping roof Low Density as a 20' sides lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or Multiple conditional % the required the required _ Fantil use setback setback MDMF 18 units Type III 20' front May project not May project not 4' 45 °/ 30% 10,000 s 30' 80'7 80' 35' flat root No pal rking or loading in per acre Type IV -, 0' rear more than the more than the 38' sloping roof front setback. as a 20' sides lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or `/z 50 %of parking shall be located Medium conditional '/,, the required the required in mainbuilding(s) &hidden Density use setback setback train public view or shall be Multiple coangletely hidden from public Family view from adjoining properties within a landsca .a bean. HDMF 0 5 units Type III 20' front May project not May project not 4' S5 °/ 30% 10,000 s.f 30' 80' x 80' 45' flat roof No parking in front setback. per sere Type IV 20' rear more than the more than the 48' sloping roof as a 20' sides lesser of 10' or Lesser of 5' or'/ 75% ofparking shall be located conditional Y the required the required in mainbuilding(s) &hidden High Density use setback setback from public view or shall be Multiple completely hidden from public view from adjoining properties Famil withn a landscape ben.. • 0 0 Town of Slrzil l�evelo�m -ent �tcrnclarcls Tlczndl�o ®k Zone Distt`bcts Max. EFI[J RZin. Ilin. Dee k Min. Deck Max. Max. Site NE". Min. Lot Mitt. Min. Max. Building Parking and Loading Density Allowance Building (ground level) (notground Amhftectnral Coverage Landscape (buildable area) Frontage Square height Location I Setbacks Setback level) Setback Projection Area Area Into Setback Commercial Districts � PA 25 units Type III 20' front May project not May project not 4' 55°% 30°% 10,000 s.f. 30' 80'x 80' 45' flat roof No parking/loading in fi ont per acre Type IV 20' rear more than the more man the 48' stoping roof setback. Public as a 20' sides lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or % 75°% ofparking shall be Aceommo- conditional / the required the required located in main building(s) datiotr use ed lick setback &hidden t:om ublic view CCI 25 units Type III None* N/A N/A N/A 80 %* No reduction 5,000 s.f. 30' N/A 33' - 60% of building No parking shall be provided per acre 'type IV in existing 43'- 40% of building on -site, as a landscaping Rzgulatzd by ti,z Yail conditional unless Viltaga Urban Design No loading in front setback. Commercial use sufficient Guido Plan& Design cause shown Considerations Core I CC2 25 units Type III 0' front Mayproject not Mayproject not 4' 70 °% ** 7T- 0,000s f 30' 80' x 80' 45' flat roof No parking or loading in per acre Type IV 10' rear more than the more than the 48' sloping root* fi ont setback. as a 10' sides ** lesser of l W or lesser of 5' or V Commercial conditional the required the required 50% ofparking shall be Core2 use setback setback oca�ed in main 6uildin >(s). CC3 12 units Type III 20' to May project not May project not 4' 40% 25 °% 25,000 s. f. 00' N/A 35' flat roof No parking or loading in per acre hype IV perimeter of more than the more than the 's8' sloping roof front setback. as a zone district lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or K Commercial conditional boundaries / the required the required Core use setback setback CSC 18 units Type III 20' front May project not May project not 4' 75°/ 20% 20,000 s.f, 100' NIA 35' flat roof No parking or loading in per acre Type IV 20' rear more than the more than the 38' sloping roof fi'ont setback. as a 20' sides lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or Commercial conditional % the required the required 50% of parking shall be Service Center use setback setback located in main bin din s). LMUT 35 units Type III 0' all Mayproject not May project not 4' 70 %unless 20 °%unless 10,000 s. f. none N/A 71' average 50 %of parking must he per acre Type IV unless specified more than the more than the specified in specified in 82.5 max. located within the main 331/. as a in Lionshead lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or'/ Lionshead Lionshead Flexibility granted building or buildings Increase conditional Redevelopment '/ the required the required Redevelopm Redevelopm by the Lionshead Lionshead over exist- use Master Plan setback setback ent Master ent Master Redevelopment Mixed Use I igmuts n In rote y Plan Plan MasterPIan LM U2 35 units Type III 10' all May project not May project not 4' 70° %unless 20% unless 10,000 s.f. none N/A 71' average 50° %ofparking must be per acre Type IV unless specified more than the more than the specified in specified in 82.5 max. located within the main 33% as a in Lionshead lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or V, Lionshead Lionshead Flexibility granted building or buildings increase conditional Redevelopment V the required the required Redevelopm Redevelopm by the Lionshead Lionshead ova exist use MastarPIan setback setback ent Master ent Master Redevelopment Mixed Use 2 ng units on ro er y Plan Plan Master Plan ABD 25 units Type III 15' front May project not May project not 4' 60% 25% 25,000 s.'f. 1100' N/A 32' tup tai of,00t) No parking or loading in per acre Type IV 6o s :i, Dug Pr nt' e led , 2a more than the more than the _ ' < p,: ,,n e 40 other , ma out setback. ' as a lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or V tool conditional 15' side V the required the required use (b[`g to 120') setback setback Mut. slope shall be 3:12 Arterial 2U side 10% ofroofmay be flat Business (blig h[ >20') 10' rear IIS N/A N/A 20'fiont May project not May project not 4' 75% 10°% 10,000 s.f. 50' N/A 35' flat roof No parking or loading in 20' rcai more than the more than the 38' , toping roof fi ont setback. 20' sides lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or'/ Heavy Set -Mice rl the required the required setback setback unless othe o, d.ignst,d by the Vail Village Urlmn ➢en'gn GeidePhw w,d Design C.,oidera[icns wiles oilienvise dcsiaru db9lhe Vail Lion] ui thbaniteovp Guide Plus laid Design.Consld — a.,s 22 Town off'Vail Develo menu Standaf Handbook Zone Districts Max. EPIU Min. Mitt. Deck Mitt. Deck Max. Max. Site Min. Min, Lot Size Min. Min. Max. Building Parking a w Leading Density Allowance Building (ground level) (not grouted Architectural Coverage Landscape (buildable area) Frontage Square Haight Location conditional Setbacks Setback level) Setback Projection Area Area General [Ise use setback setback Into Setback I Open Space and Recreation Districts A I unit per 1 Type 11 as 20' front May project not May project not 4' S% NIA 35 acres NIA N!A 30' flat roof No pin king in any setback. Council 35 acres a conditional i5' rear more than the more than the Council Council (I acre buildable) Council 33' sloping roof Special use 15` sides lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or'/ Development Agricultural V the required the required Dishier and Open setback setback OR N/A N/A 20' front May project not May project not 4' S °/ As N%A N/A N/A 2I' f roof See Title 12, Chapter 10, rear more than the more than the determined 24' sloping roof Municipal Code. 20' sides lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or by the (except as % the regtuFed the required Design maybe setbauk setback Review b'lttcr Boatel restricted bj the I'l-C in coriunctio n with a Outdoor conditional Recreation use pewit) NAP N/A N!A VlA N/A Nt/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A Set b y PEC Natural Area Preservatioat SBI2 l unit per Type Ill Set by PEC Set by PEC Set by PEC Set by PEC Set by PEC Set by PEG 40 acres VIA N/A 35' (60% of build ng Set by PEC 8 acres Type IV (I acre buildable) coverage) Ski B a e 40'(40% of building eovera e) Special and Miscellaneous Districts P N/A Type III N/A N A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A See Title 12, Chapter 10, 'type IV as a Municipal Code . conditional Parkin use GU Set by Type III Set by PEC May project not May project net 4' Set by PEC Set by PEC Set by PEC Set by PEC Set by Set by PEC Set by PEC PEC Iype IV more than the more than the PEC as a lesser of 10' or lesser of 5' or Vh conditional % the required the required General [Ise use setback setback SDD Set by Set by Set by Set by Council Set by Council Set by Council Set by Set by Set by Council Set by Set by Set by Council Set by Council Council Council Council Council Council Council Council Special Development Dishier • • 2 GFWA Credits Zone Districts GRFA Ratio/Percentage (added to results ofappikation of percentage) HR 20' /o of lot area of first 21,780 sq. ft. + None hillside Residential 5% of lot area over 21,780 sq. ft. SFR 25% of lot area of first 12,500 sq. ft. + 425 sq. ft. per allowable dwelling unit Single-fandly Residential 10% of lot area over 12,500 sq. ft. R 25% of lot area of first 15,000 sq. ft. + 425 sq. ft. per allowable dwelling unit Two- Famfly 10% of lot area over 15,000 sq. ft. and up to 30,000 sq. ft. + 5% of Residential lot area over 30,022 . ft. P/S 25 %oflotarea offirst 15,000 sq. ft. + 425 sq. ft, per allowable dwelling unit Primary/ Secondary 10% of lot area over 15,000 sq, ft. and up to 30,000 sq. ft. + 5% of (the secondary unit shalt not exceed 40% of Residential lot area over 30,000 sq. ft. GRFA on -bite prior to apptication of oredit) RC 25% ofbuildable tot area 225 sq. #t. for single - family and two - Residential Cluster family structures only LDNIF 30% of buildable lot area 225 sq. ft. for single- family and two - Low Density Multiple Family family structures only MDMF 35% of buildable lot area 225 sq. ft. for single - family and two - Medium Density Multiple family structures only Fa mils HDMF 6 {)% o f buildable lot area None High Density Multiple Family FA 80% of buildable lot area None Public Accommodation CCl 80% of buildable lot area None Commercial Core 1 CC2 80% of buildable lot area None Commercial Core 2 C'C3 30% of buildable lot area None Commercial Core 3 CSC 40 %ofbuildable lot area None Commercial Service Center GRFA shall not exceed 50% of total building floor area on any site f,MUI Up to 250% of buildable lot area or None Lionshead ,Mixed Use 1 increase of 33% over existing GRFA on site, whichever is greater LMU2 Up to 250% of buildable lot area or None Lionshead Mixed Use 2 increase of33% over existing GRFA on site, whichever is greater ABD 50% of buildable lot area None Arterial Business . Hs None permitted None Heavy Service A Up to 2,000 sq, ft. total None Agricultural and Open Space OR None permitted None Outdoor Recreation P None permitted None Parking GU Per P'EC approval None General Use NAP None permitted None Natural Area Preservation SRR Unlirnited, per Council approval None Sid Rase Recreation SDI) Per underlying zoning or development plan approval by Council None Special Development District 2 Town of'Vail Development Standards Handbook Town of ' hail Development Standards Handbook Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook 7. Rooftop heating and air conditioning equipment, large vent stacks, elevator penthouses and similar features should be avoided; however, if necessary, shall be designed to be compatible with the overall design of the structure or screened from view. Rooftop antennas shall not be permitted unless as allowed under a conditional use review as specified within the Zoning Code. 8. Solar collectors shall lie flat on pitched roofs; however, when retrofitting an existing building with active solar, the collectors should be designed and placed in d manner compatible with the overall design of building. 9. Deep eaves, overhangs, canopies, and other building features that provide shelter from the elements are encouraged. 10. Fenestration should be suitable for the climate and for the orientation of the particular building elevation in which the fenestration occurs. The use of both passive and active solar energy systems is strongly encouraged. !I 9 28 Town of Vail Development S'tandar'ds Handbook a. Christmas tree lights which are of a temporary nature located in residential zone districts, as listed herein, and which are illu 'hated only between November 1 and April 15 of each year. b. Christmas tree lights which are temporary in nature and are located in zone districts other than those residential districts listed herein. c. Sign illumination, as set forth in 'Title l 1 of the Municipal Code. G. Landscaping, Drainage, and Erosion Controls Town af'Vail DevelOpMent Standards Handbook aspen and other vegetation tolerant of drier conditions. The valley floor which is adjacent to Gore Creek consists of a wide variety of trees and shrubs adapted to the relatively fertile soil and natural availability of water. Town of Vail Development Standardv Handbook directed to natural or improved drainage channels or dispersed into shallow sloping vegetated areas. T 9. 10. All plantings must be mulched. 11. Waving near a tree to be saved roust contain a plan for a "tree vault" in order to ensure the ability of the roots to receive air. I Design of fences, walls, and other structural landscape features shall be of 34 Town of Fail Developinent Standards Handbook abutting the streets a distance of thirty feet (30) along each lot line. 5. Height Limitations: Fences, hedges, walls and landscaping screens shall not exceed three feet (3') in height within any required front setback area, and shall not exceed six feet (6) in height in any other portion of the site, provided that higher fences, hedges, walls or landscaping screens may be authorized by the Administrator when necessary to screen public utility equipment. No barbed wire or electrically charged fence shall be erected or maintained. Accessory Structures; Utilities; Service Areas: 1. Design of accessory structures upon a site shall be compatible with the design and materials of the main structure or structures upon the sate. 2. Accessory buildings generally should be attached to the main building either directly or by means of a continuous wall, fence or similar feature of the same or a complementary material as the main building's exterior finish. 3. All utility service systems shall be installed underground. Any utility system the operation of which requires above ground installation shall be located and /or ' screened so as not to detract from the overall site design quality, 4. All utility meters shall be enclosed or screened from public view. 5, Service areas, outdoor storage, and garbage storage shall be screened from adjacent properties, structures, streets, and other public areas by fences, berms, or landscaping. 6; Adequate trash storage areas shall be provided. There shall be year-round access to all trash storage areas which shall not be used for any other purpose. q Satellite Dish Antennas: 1. Purpose: a. To protect the health and safety of the inhabitants of the Town by setting forth requirements for the installation of satellite dish antennas. b, To protect and support the aesthetic concerns of the Town, a resort _ community which must remain aesthetically pleasing to visitors to remain economically viable, C. To provide the protection set forth in the preceding subsection 1 and 2 of this section in the least restrictive manner possible. 34 Town of Vail Develo Town of'Vail Development Slandards Handbook h. Adjacent property owners and owners of dwelling units on the same lot as the applicant shall be notified of any application for the installation of a satellite dish antenna. Notification procedures shall be as outlined in Section 12 -14 -19 of Title 12. Names and mailing addresses of adjacent property owners and of owners of dwelling units on the same lot as the applicant shall be provided to the Department of Community Development by the applicant. i, Due to the special aesthetic importance of the core areas of the Town, exterior installations of satellite dish antennas in Commercial Cores 1 and 2 shall be permitted only if screened by some type of enclosing structure. Said structures required to enclose a satellite dish antenna in these areas shall comply with all applicable zoning regulations and shall be architecturally compatible with the existing structure. 4. Design Guidelines It is the purpose of these guidelines to ensure that the visibility of a satellite dish antenna from any public right of way or adjacent properties be reduced to the highest degree possible. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate how the satellite dish antenna installations complies with these guidelines. The following guidelines shall be used by the Design review Board in evaluating applications for satellite dish antennas: a. All wiring and cable related to a satellite dish antenna shall be installed underground. b. The use of mesh satellite dish antennas is highly encouraged because of their ability to be more sensitively integrated o a site or structure. C. The use of appropriate colors shall be required to provide for a more sensitive installation when integrating a satellite dish antenna onto a site or structure. Color selection for a satellite dish antenna should be made with respect to specific characteristics on a site or structure. Unpainted surfaces and satellite dish antennas with reflective surfaces shall not be allowed. d. Locations of satellite dish antennas shall be made so as to ensure that the satellite dish antenna is screened from view from any public right of way or adjacent property to the highest degree passible. In addition to effective site planning, screening a satellite dish antenna may be accomplished through the use of landscaping materials, fencing; existing structures, sub -grade placements or other means that both screen the satellite dish antenna and do not appear unnatural on the site. e. Satellite dish antennas on or attached to existing structures shall be 36 MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY/PARKING LOS' CROSS SLOPE (%) - Dep a rtment Stand Slop ldths, Flares, and Cross � _._ - 4 - 7- 7 MIN SITE DIST =250' _ BOTH SIDES OF DRIVE w� *SEE MOTES *NOTE: WHERE PARKING ACCESS TO THE STREET IS BY DRIVEWAY, THE MAXIMUM CURB CUT WIDTH SHALL BE 24' -1 24' 1® - DIRECYf c wm or ve,4 SrTE EST n V ME PUBLIC ROADWAY 90 j r 3 D` e W, 7D° MIN ECA EA 4 10% - - - 12% THE MAXIMUM GRADE BREAK FOR A SINGLE FAMILY, C FAMILY AND PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENCE DRIVEWAY IS 14%. I.E. 2% + 12% = 14 %, OR 4% + 10% = 14 ECA EGA 2% 4 2% THE MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY GRADE THE MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY GRADE BREAK FOR A MULTIPLE FAMILY BREAM FOR A MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT WITH 4 TO 11 UNITS DWELLING UNrr WITH 11 OR MORE IS 6%. IE. 2% + 4% = 6% UNITS IS 4%. IE. 2 + 2 = 4 D epartment of Public or f Tr rl p rt do 4 Driveway Sa GRDBRK Maximum Driveway r Breaks 6 Single Family, Two Family, Prima ry/secondary 'M TURNRB Minimum Centerline Turning Radius n FIREHOSE 1 150' MAX LENGTH FIR HO E 150` MAX LENGTH 3 Id 35' L00 STAGING AREA 11 Minimum Residential Fire Department Staging Area 11 as soaxea.aav ®SY 11 W;I VVP%Lt. it S(iL Ljr — r - LK FINISHED GRADE ALL FALLS WITHIN A PRISM DEFINED AS STARTING 1' BEHIND THE FADE OF THE LOWER WALL AT THE LOWEST FINISHED GRADE LINE 1 MEASURED FROM AND THEN BACK AT AN ANGLE OF 1.5<1. BOTTOM FRONT OF WALL . A COMDINATION WALL REQUIRES A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S STAMP IF THE TOTAL COMBINED WALL HEIGHT EXCEEDS 4 FEET 12. Index I I Access Grade Change: ............... 4 Access Grade: ... __ ........ ....... ........... 4 Administration ...... 2 Adoption _ __ . ......... ........... ___3 Appeals...,. ........ ___ .... ............ ...... 3 Applicability , _ - . . . ....... __ ... __ ...... ........ 2 Architectural Projection into Setback: ... ...... .... __4 Backing into the street/right-of-way ........ ......... ... . 16 Back-out/Turn-around area ............. ............................... 12 Back-out/Turn-around Area: ... .......... 4 Batter ...... ............ ........... ____4 .......... ... __ ..... ..... _ 4 Boulder Retaining Walls............ ............................... 4,19 Building Code,..... ... ...... ........ 4 Building Height ............... 4 Building Setbacks .... _ ........ ...... ___ ....... ......... .... - ....... A Combination Retaining ........... __ ...... _4 Combination Retaining Walls.......... ... .......... 19 Construction Fence ........................... ............... Critical Root Zone ...................... ................... 5,18 Cross-Over ............ ...... ___ .... _ ....... ....... 5 Cross-Over Aisle .............................. .......................... 5 Curb Cut., ..... ....... .............. .......... 12 Curb-Cut,. ..... ...... ........ __ ____ 13 Debris Flow ... 20 Deck Setback,... ...... 5 not ground level ........................... ...... ... 13 Demo/Rebuild ..... _ .... __ ......... ....... 5 Density . . ... __ ........ ....... 5 Design Review Board (DRB) 5 Design Review Standards and Guidelines ...... ............. .25 Accessory Structures .................... ............................. 7 Architectural projections ............ ............................... 25 balconies.... ..... ...... 25 baywindows .................... ................... 25 Building Materials And Design.. ... ....... ....... .... 26 decks ......... 25 drainage. . ..... ........ ......... 31 Duplex and Primary/Secondary Development ............ 28 erosion control ...... ...................... _............................31 31 Fences.- ........ .......... __ ... .......... 33 Fences, Hedges, Walls, and Screening ............ 29, 30 General Compatibility ................ ............................... 25 Fledges ........ _ ....... _ ..... ___ ...... ....... ......... 33 Landscaping, drainage, and erosion control - . ........... .31 Outdoor L;uhtim: ..... ... ___ .... ... ........... ...... 28 Required shrubti ....... ...... ....... ....................... __ 32 Required Trees .......... __ .......... .... __ ... ...... __ 32 Satellite Dish Antennas ............... ___ ....... ..... ___ ... 34 Screening ......... ...... ____ .... ............ ........... 33 Accessory Structures; Utilities ............ - - - 3 4 Service Areas ........... ...... 34 Site Planning...... ....... .................. ...... ... 25 steps ......... ... 25 Utilities.. .......... ____ ........ ....... 34 Walls ...... ...... ........ ........ ... 33 Disturbed Area ... ...... ........... ....... _ 5 Drainage . 16 Driveway ....... __ 5 Town of Vail Deve Standar& Handbook Driveway Pan.. ........... ...... 5. 12 Driveway/Feeder Road Standards... . .............................. I I Dwelling unit ... .... ........ __ ..... ....... ...... ___6 Dwelling, multiple-family .................. ..............................6 Dwelling, single-family .................... ....................... 6 Dwelling, Two-Family ....................... ..................... EHU .. . ' * ........................................ * ..... * ..... * ............. * ...... * 6 Entry Angle .... ...... ...... ____ ......... 6 Erosion Control ..... ...... ........ 18 Existing Vegetation .......................... ....................... Exposed Face . ............ ...... _ ...... ........ _____6 Feeder Road_ ........... __6 Fire Code........ .... ........ ....... ....... ... 6 Fire Department staging area.... ............................... 14 Fire lane ..... .......... 16 Flood Plain Standards: ..... ........ 19 Frontage ......... _ ....... .......... ......... ...... ..................... .... 6 Geologic Hazards ..... ........ ....... _ 20 Debris ............................... ............................... 20 Rock Fall ... ...... ... _ ... ....... ......... .... 20 Snow Avalanche,... ....... 20 Unstable soils......... .... ............ ....... 20 Grades _ . _ - _ . . . . .... __ ............. ......... 16 Grading Standards ...... _ ............. ................. 18 Gross Residential Floor Area ............. ... _ ...... ___,24 Guard Rails ............ ......... __ ____ 13 Hazard Maps... .... ........... ______20 Hazards .............................. ...... ...... __ ......... 20 Heated Drives ... 13 Landscape Area.. ...... .......... ...... 6 Landscaping.. ........ ...... ___ ........ 7,16 Location..... ... ....... ............ ........ ....... 16 Lot ... ...... .............. 7 Lot .. _ . .... .... ......... ........... ............ 7 Natural Features ............................. ............................... 18 Nonconforming Sites.. ...................... ............................. Noriconformities . .............................. ............................... 2 On-street parking, ... ............. 16 Outdoor Lighting ... ...... __ ............ 28 Approval Required ....................... .............................29 Cutoff Shields .. ............................ .............................31 Exemptions... ............................. ............................... 31 Flashing, Revolving Lights ....... ......... ........ _31 Full cutoff ............................ .... 29, 30 Height Limits For Light Fixtures ............................... 30 Light source.. .... ..... - ...... ........ 29 Light Sources Affixed To Structures...,...... ....... 30 Luminance .... ........ ... ____ .... ................ 29 Luminous area ......................._.. ......_...........__........2.9 Nonconformances ... _ ....... ........ ..... 31 Outdoor lighting. ..... __ ... ..... ...... ........ 29 Penalty ...... ........... ­* ........... * .......................... __ 31 Purpose ............ * ............................ * ................. * ..... 2S Source lumens. ........................... ............................... 29 P. E. Stamped Design ......................... ..............................7 Parking Lot Design Standards ........ ......... ....... 15 Parking Requirements................... ... 12 Parking space size .......................... ............................... 12 pavement radii for fire truck access .............................. � 14 49 3 0 Town of Vail Development Standards Handbook 0 Permanent Grading Standards ......... ............................... 18 Permanent Slope Protection Measures.............................. 7 Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) .. ............7 22 Primary/Secondary . .... _ ..... _ ... ...... ............ .......... 12 Professional Engineer ........................ ..............................7 Public Way ....... ........ ....... 7 Purpose and Intent ............................. ..............................2 Residential Access and Parking Standards, .,. . .... _ ... ... 12 Residential Fire Department Access Standards ............... 14 Retaining Wall .. _ _ . _ . ......... ............. _ ...... .... _7 Retaining Walls.............................. ............................... 19 Rock Fall,. ..... .................. ..... .20 Satellite Dish Antennas ................... ............................... 34 Compliance With Requirements ...... ....... .... 35 Design Guidelines ........................ .............................36 ....... __ ... 23 Purpose....... ..... _ .... ... __ ............... ...... 34 Application ... ......... ....... 35 Setback ... ...... ............ 8 Setback area.. ...... ...... ...... ...... 8 Setback ..................... ....... 8 Setback Line, Front .... .............. 8 Setback Line, Rear . ... ....... ........ 8 Setback Line, Side ........ 8 Sight distance triangle ........ ...... ...... __ .... 12 Sight Distance Triangle .................... ............................... 8 Site ............ 7 Site Coverage...,.. ..... ___ ....... 8 Slope............ __ ... ____ ...... .... ____ .8 Snow Avalanche ....... ....... ........ ....... ... .20 Snow storage.. ... 16 Square Area ... .... ...... ....... 9 StagingArea .............................. ............................... 9, 14 Street, Private, . 9 Street, Public . _ . _ . ....... ................... ...... 9 Summary of Site Development Standards Agricultural and Open Space 23 Arterial Business.. 22 Commercial Core 1 22 Commercial Core 2...................... .............................22 Commercial Core 3 .................... ............................... 22 Commercial Service Center .......... .............................22 HeavyService.............................. .............................22 High Density Multiple Family............................. 21,22 I-Ellside Residential ...................... .............................21 Low Density Multiple Family..... ............................... 21 Medium Density Multiple Family .............................. 21 Natural Area Preservation........... ............................... 23 Outdoor ....... ........ _ 23 Parking,.. ....... ........... ....... __ ... 23 Public Accommodation .... _ ... ___ ....... ...... .... 22 Residential Cluster . ............. ....... 2 1 Single Family Residential............. .............................21 Ski Base Recreation ..... _ ... ...... 23 Special Development District ... _ ........ ... 23 Two-Family Residential ............. ............................... 21 Surfacing ............................... ............................12, 13, 16 Tandem parking ............................... .............................17 Temporary Grading ... ........ ....... _9 Temporary Grading Standards ........ ............................... 18 Temporary Slope Protection Measures .... .......... .......... _9 Three Point Tom.............................. .............................10 Trail head parking , . ............. ...... .......... 16 Unstable soils,.....,. ....... ......... ..... 20 Valet parking.. ...... __ .......... _ ....... ....... 17 Variances........ ... ...... 3 Vehicular maneuverability.. ... ....... ......... 12 Wetlands. ... ...... _______20 0 * TO: Planning and Environmental Commission DATE: July 12, 1995 1. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The Town of Vail is requesting a conditional use permit in order to construct a neighborhood park located at the unplatted portion of the SE 1 /4, SE 1 /2, SW 1 /2 of Section 11, Township 5, Range 81 West and lots 1,2, and 3, Block H, Vail das Schono / 2497, 2485, and 2487 Garmisch. The unplatted lot is currently zoned Outdoor Recreation, while the three lots are zoned Residential Cluster. A park is a conditional use in both zone districts. The parcel will be re-platted as part of a separate application. development team. The applicant's letter has been attached for reference. . . TION The Community Development Department recommends approval of the conditional use permit for a neighborhood park, subject to the following findings: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section} of the zoning code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. Ills ISSUES FOR DI SCUSSION It is the Planning and Environmental Commission's role to review the proposed use of the site as a parka The following are discussion items pertaining to the Planning and Environmental Commission's role in reviewing this Conditional Use Permit A. Park le rats to include: Pestroom Soft Surface Trail to Cortina Lane Picnic Shelter On-Street Parking A Accessible Path One Handicapped Parking Space Open Turf Area Multiple Play Structures B. Vehicle Access The park is proposed to have on- street parking and one handicap parking space within the parking lot for the employee housing complex. C Pedestrian Access Pedestrian access will be provided to all structures and play equipment, meeting AIWA requirements. The Town of Vail will be providing a sidewalk connection across the property of both the park and the housing. There is also a proposed trail from the park to Cortina Lane. Potential Benefits The proposed park will provide active and passive park uses primarily for the neighborhood. There are children's play areas provided for multiple age groups. A restroom and picnic shelter have also been provided. All structures and play equipment are accessible per ALFA requirements. IV. REVIEW CRITERIA THIS 2 The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by the Town of Vail Municipa Code. The Arosa/Garmisch Park is located in the Outdoor Recreation and Residential Clustra zone districts. The proposal is subject to the issuance of a» mdi »: se permit in accordanc ] with the provisions of Title 12, Chapter 16. For the Planning and Environmental Commission reference, the conditional use permit purpose statement indicates that U LI 0 4 244k 3 2-458 2 2466 7 AK 7 2444 6 0 0 Relationship m. act of the use on development objectives of the Town. The proposed restroorn facility is to be small (arse to two fixtures) and will only have a minor impact upon utility needs and costs. A portion of the site will need irrigation for the growing season. These needs would be met with an automated underground irrigation system. • i Hl" So Chas Bernhardt made a motion for approval for the Major Exterior Alteration, according to the recommendations and findings in the staff memo. Diane Golden seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4 -0. Galen Aasland made a motion for approval of the conditional use permit, in accordance with the staff memo and stated that it met the findings on pages 7 & 8 of the staff memo. Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4 -0. Mane Golden made a motion for approval of the variance, in accordance with the staff findings. John Schofield stated that the lot and building constituted a hardship. Galen Aasland seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4 -0, 2. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of a Type 11 employee housing unit, located at 265 Forest Road / Lot 21, dock 7, Vail Village 1 St Filing. Applicant: Lawrence Flinn, represented by Mitchell Studio, LLC Manner: Allison Ochs Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo. John Schofield asked if the applicant had anything to add. The applicant was not present and there was no public comment. Galen Aasland stated that he agreed with the project. John Schofield said the DRB had reviewed this and final plans needed to be submitted. Chas Bernhardt stated this would come back to the PFC, if it didn't meet all the criteria. Allison Ochs said it didn't meet code, regarding parking and the size. John Schofield said it was subject to DREG approval. Diane Golden had no comments, Chas Bernhardt made a motion for approval in accordance with the staff memo. Diane Golden seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4 -0. 0 Manning and Environmental Commission 2 Minutes July 12, 1999 3, A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6, Town of Vail Code, to allow for are encroachment into a required front setback, located at 2696 Davos Trail 1 Lot 6, Took C, • Planning and Environmental Commission 3 Minutes July 12, 1999 . A request for a find recommendation to the /ail Town Council of the Development Standards Handbook, Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo and stated that the Town Engineer had trouble with the double -track driveway John Schofield stated there was no public present for the meeting, Galen Aasland asked to strike the "once annually" on page 2 of the handbook. Russ Forrest asked for a time limit, since if Town Council does not act on the staff action, it becomes null and void after one year. He explained where the Town Code is referenced, staff has not changed it. He said otherwise, it would be enforceable on the go ahead from the Town Manager. John Schofield said staff could not change anything in the code. Galen Aasland said the language could affect the applicant. John Schofield said the applicant could appeal it, Russ Forrest explained that staff has made calls on fire issues, turnaround issues, etc., that were not specifically addressed in the Town Code. George Ruther explained that the intent was an information document, unlike the Zoning Regulations and that this would not be adopted by ordinance. He said it could be amended in the future by a resolution. He said an applicant could be held to the standards and that the document was enforceable. Russ Forrest said this handbook was trying to clarify "up front" with the applicant. Galen Aasland said he had concerns with holding the applicant to an interpretation. Russ Forrest said the primary purpose was to clarify to the applicant. Chas Bernhardt said this was really a good advance step to give to developers and that he was in favor of approval. [Mane Golden wanted to approve this. John Schofield asked that the cover page of the Development Standards include that it was an information book, with a disclaimer and that allowances be given for short -terra parking on the streets for special events. Diane Golden disagreed that allowing the parking in the streets would be giving people the suggestion that parking off -site was allowed Galen Aasland made a motion to recommend to Council with the following text changes: 1. That the Title Page include "Information Book." 2. That a disclaimer be on the Title Page that "this is for information only; the final approval be determined by the existing code." "once 3. That the verbiage annually" be deleted from the Administration paragraph on page 2. Planning and Environmental Commission 4 Minutes July 12, 1939 a That "water features" be added to the landscaping paragraph on page 7. Todd Oppenheimer explained that the open area was 2%, which was pretty flat, with an upslope to catch soccer balls, sleds etc. Diane Golden said kids locking themselves in the bathroom was a concern. Allison Ochs said the housing wanted a separation of parking for themselves and the park. I I I I I I I I III F I I I I I 11: 1 Todd Oppenheimer said there needed to be a separate play area for the preschool and school age children. Diane Golden suggested trees for privacy. Todd Oppenheimer said a lot of usable area for this park was used for housing. He said that since this was a preliminary review, more work can be done on this. He said he understand the PEC comments on the park being too close to the residents. MMAM