Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-0809 PEC THlS ITEM MAY AFFECT "YOIJR F'RC)PERTY PUBLIC NOT~~E NC)TICE IS HEREB`t GIVEN tha# the Plannirag and Ersvironmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vaol on August 99 1999, at 2;00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Buiidings In ccansideratiort ofa A request for a conditional use perrr,it, to allovu for the establishment of an cautdoor patio dining area, located at 240 Wall Street ; "One Vail PIace,," A portion of B1ock 5C, Vail Village First FiIingo App9icantm Joe Joyce / Joe's Famcaus C3eii Planners Allison Oci~s A request for a variance from Section 12-2-2, Town of Vail Code to ailow for the construction of a single-family residence on a s9ope ira excess of 40% within the Residentia! Ciuster zone district, located at 4355 Bighorn Road / Lot 3, BIock 3, Bighorn Third Addition. Applicant: Michael J. Lauterbach Planner: Brent Wilson A (eqllest for afTle(1dmeSlts tCJ T9t'e 12, ~on1i1g wI$h r£.'spect tt) EmplC3yee HotJsing Unlt Standards, inimurrs Lot Size Requirement in the Primary/Secondary and Two-F'amily Residentsad Zone Districts and Site Coverage Standards. AIso, a proposal for a new zone district entitled Affordabl~ ~ousing (AH) Distr9ct. Appiicant: Towr~ ~f Vail Planner, Dominic Maurielio/George Ruther T°he applicatiorrs and ir~format°son about the proposals are avaiiable for pubEic inspection during regular of#ice hours in the project pianner's office located at #he Touvn of Vail Communwty DeveIopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for informationR Sgiygr ~~m lar~g5~aage ir~terpre9~tation availabie capc~!~n request ~rwith 24 ho~sr r~otification. Please ca11 479- 2bd50.dq T4reioph9J8 @Be fbY9 {,B tle H€aGid 1A $g IC n 1paHd4s6dy fA/3 1@ if43i 818CA4iL/W 1. Commaanity ~eveiapment Department Published July 23, 1999 in the Vail 7'ra61. 1 ~ T{~ W:' OF YA~L ~ 1 L i V1 1° L COMMISSION PUBLIC T1 LE Mortday, August 9, 1999 AGENDA Co unity Deve1o2mertt epartment 12:00 a o MEMBER5 ~~~~ENT MEMBERS ABSENT ite Visits w 1a0 . w 1. Joe's Famous Deli - 240 VVall Street 2. Lauterbach 4355 Bighorn Road 3, Park @ Garrrrisch - 2497, 2485, 24$7 Garmasch Drivera Brent ~ NOT°Ee !f the PEC hearing exferrds until 6n00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.me u Iic HerLn m°To n Councii ha bers m0 m. 1, A request for a conditionai use permitg to a16ow for the estabiishment of an outdoor patio dining area, iocated at 240 Wall Street / "One Vail P9ace,,, a portion of Block 5C9 Vai1 Viliage First Filinga Applicant; Joe Joyce / Joe's F~ ous DeIs Planner: Allison Ochs 2. A request for a variance from Section 12-2-2, Town of VaiI Code to a13ow for the cortstruction of a single-family residence ort a sIope arr excess of 40°lo w6thin the Resadential Cluster zone district, Iocated at 4355 Bighorn Road /Lot 3, Blcack 3, Bighorn Third Addftion, Applacang: (VBichae! J. Lauterbach Planner: Brent Wilson 3, A r~quest for a conditional use permit, to allow for ihe creation of a public park, Iocated at Lots 1,2 & 3, BlCick H, VaIl daS ~chof1e/2497, 24$5, 2487 ~~rm9sc$l and fhe uf1platted portion of the SE 1/4, SE 1f44 SE '/a, SW ofi Section 11, Township 5, Range 81 West. Applicantn Town af Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer P9anner: A#lison Ochs b~ TOYVN 0F YAIL ~ 1 4. A request for a worksession for amendments to Title 12, Zerneng wfth respect to Empfoyee Fiaus'sng lJnit Standards, MEraimum Lot Size Requirement in the Primary/Secondary and Two-Family Residential Zone Districts and Site Coverage Standards. A€so, a proposai for a new zorte district entitled Affordable Fiousing (AH) District, App9icant: Tovvn of Vaii PIanner: Dominic Mauriello/George Ruther °t` L TtL AUGUST 3, 1 9 5, A request for a minor subdivssion, #o vacate common 1ot fines to create a neuv Iot, located af 2477, 2485, 2487, 2497 Garr~~~~h Drive/ Lots 1-4, BIock H, Vail Das Schone #2, App0icant: Town of Vail, represented bX Nina Timrr€ Planner: A(Isson Ochs T LED UNTIL AUGUST 3,1 9 6. Inforrraation lJpdate 7. Apprc~val of Juiy 26, 1999 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for pub(ic inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office Iocated at the Town of Vail Community ~eveiopmer~~ ~epartmerrt, 75 South Frontage Roade Please cai€ 479-2138 far in€ormation. Sign Eanguage interpretation avai(ab(e upon reqtaest vuittr 24 hour notifocation. Please call 419-2356, Telephorte €or ihe Hearing Impaired, for infarmation. Community DeveEopment Departrnent F'ublished August 6, 1999 irt the llail Trail 2 L I ENV1 i° L COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING L Monda.y, August 9, 1999 F! L P,GENDA rojec# rientation I PEC L - ommt~~it~ 12:0 A MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT John Schof9eld Galen Aasland Diar~~ Golden Brian Doyon `forn eber Chas Bernhardt [3oug Cahill i#e Visits : 1900 Pn m 1, Joe's Farraous Deli - 240 Wa9! Street 2. Lauterbach-4355 B°sghorn Road 3, Park @ Garmisch - 2497, 2485, 2487 Garmisch Driver: Brent D fl'TE: if the PEC hearing extends urrti! 6:00 p.m., the board wiH break Fc,r dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. u I1c He ° To Cl oi311c11 h fs 2:00 . 1, A request for a conditional use permit, to aiiovv for the establashment of ar~ ~~tdoor patio dining area, Iocated aY 244 Wa1] Street I "Or~e Vai9 P1ace,,, a portion of B9ock 5C, Vail Vidlage First Fiiing- Applicant, Joe Joyce / Joe's Far~ous DeIi Planner: AlIison Ochs MflTlO1V: Brian Doyon SE~ONC3. Tom 1lVeber VOTE: 7-0 APPROVED I°T 1 C 1T1 , ThA ouidoor dining patio is subject to design review by staff andlor the Desig~ ~eview Board. Ail fiurniture (iee. chairs, tab4es, and umbreilas) must meet the Tawn Code, as approved through the Design Revieuv application and that the condional use permit for tap to six tables be reviewed by staff a#ter one yeara j ~'~WN O~' 1 2. A ; equest #or a variance #rom Section 12-2-2, Town of Vail Code to a!!ow for the construction of a single-family residence on a s(ope in excess of 40°fa within the Residential Cluster zone disirict, :ocated at 4355 Bighorn Road / Lot 3, B9ock 3, mghorn Third Additian. Applicant: iehae! Ja Lauterbach P9anner; rent ilson OTiONa Tom Weber SECCNC7. Doug Cahill VC?TE: 7-0 APPROVED [T1 CONDITION: 1 a In order to avoid more impact to the site than is necessary to achieve development objectives9 deveaoprrrent should be restricted to the area belovu the 8470' contour 9irse, as dete irted by the C?esign Revieuv Board artd as depicted on th~ enc!osed site pian artd survey. 3. A request #ar a conditional use permit, tca allow fior the creation of a pubiic park, Iocated at Lots 1,2 & 3, BIock H, Vaii das schone/2497, 2485, 2487 Garmisch and the unplatted portion o€ the SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SE 1/~, SVV 1/4of Section 11, Township 5, Rarage 81 West. Appbicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tocid Oppenheimer P(annere Allison Ochs MOTION; Ga{en Aasiand 5~~ONDoDiane GoIden VOTE: 5-2 (Bernhardt, Doyon voted against) APPROVED tTH 1 CONDITION: 1, That the r~ew design have a total of foiar "head sn" parkirtg spaces on Garmisch and one handacapped space in the parking for the employee housing. 4. A request for a worksess6an #or amendments to Title 12, Zorirag with respect ta Employee Hotasing Unit Standards, Minimurn Lot Size Requirerrtent in the Primary/Secondary and Two-Famdly Residential Zone Districts artd Site Coverage Standards. A6sog a proposal for a new zone district entitled Affordable Nousing (AH) Destrict. Applicant: `1`own of Vail Planner: Dominic CV!aurie6lo/George F3uther ~ LED U 1 1L 4s T 23y 3 999 5. A request for a minor subdivisaon, to vaeate common Iot 9dnes to create anevv Iot, focated at 2477, 2485, 2487, 2497 Garmisch Drive/ Lots 1-4, Block H, Vaii C3as Schae~e #2e Appiicant: Town of Vai9, represent~~ ~y Nina Tdmm Planner: AIlison Ochs TA LED €JNTIL A GllSi 23, 1999 & Information Update 7. Approva{ of Ju6y 26, 1999 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public 'snspection during regular office hours in the project pdanner`s of#'sce 6ocated at the Town af Vail Community Dvvelopment Department, 75 ~outh Frontage Road. PIease ca(I 479-2138 for information. Sign 4anguage interpretation avaifable uparr request with 24 hocar notificatian. P9ease caI! 479-2356, TePephane €flr the Hearing irnpaired, for infarrnation. 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmenta1 Commission FRO : Comrraunity Development Department DA,TEe August 9, 1999 SUBJECT: A request for a variance from Section 12-2-2, Torrvn of Vail Code to aIlow for the construcfion of a single-famiiy residence on a slope in excess of 40% within the Residential Gluster zone distract, 3ocated at 4355 Bighorn Road l Lot 3, B1ock 3, Bighorn Third Addition. A,ppli nt; Michael J. Lauterbach Plannere Brent Wilson 1, C l! ! T~ F T 1° The applacant is requesting a variance to aIlow for the construction of a single-family residence on a prartion of Lot 3, Block 3, Bighorn 3rd Additi~n with a sIope i~ ex~~~~ ~f 40d/a, The Towrs's Hazard Reguiations stipuiate tha# "no structure shall be built on a slope of 40°l0 or greater except in Singfe-Famiiy Residentmal, TwopFamily Resideratiai, or Two-FamiBy PrimarylSecondary Residential zone districts." The subject property is zoned Residentla9 C9uster. At their July 21, 1999 meeting, the Town's Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the applicant's request to construct a singie-fami8y residence on portior~~ of the property outside the area of excessive sIope. After reviewing the proposed development p1an and visiting the site, the DRB ack~owfedged "the presence of s6gnificant mature vegeta#ion and na#ural features99 on the site and directed the applgcant to pursue a variance in order to buiid on t~e upland portion of the propertye A 9efter from the Design Review Board regarding this project is included in this memorandum #or referencee The purpose and intent ofi the Town's Hazard Regulatians is to: "Help protect the inhabitants of the Town from dangers re9ating to development of flood piains, avalanche paths, steep slopes and geologically sensitive areas; to regula#e the use of land areas which rr,ay be subject to fiooding and avafanche or which may be geologi !!y sensi#ive; and further to regulate development on steep s9opes; to protect the economic and property vafcaes of fihe Town, to protect the aesthetic and r°ecreational values and naturai ~~~ources ofi the Town, which are sometimes asscaciated vvith f9o0d plains, avalanche areas and areas of geoIog'scal sensitivity and slopes; to minimize damage to pubaic facilities and utiiifiies and minirnsze the need fcar relief in cIeanup operations; to give notice to the pub(ic of certaan areas within the Town vvhere flood piains, avalanche areas and areas of geologic sensitivity exist; and to promofe #he generai public healtha safety and we6fare.," ~ a; ro~ao~~n~ ~ A review of the Town's geologic hazard rrtaps reveals there are no identified snovu avalanche, rockfa§!, floodplain or debris filoanr hazards on this property. In 1994, the PEC denied a sirrtiiar request (coeast ctron on a slope in exc~~~ ~~~05ya) on this property for a proposal that vvas more expansive with an additional Type III EHIJ. However, s#afF feels this current request is far less 9mpactive than the previous submittale iL BOARD LES A i lL1TI The firtdings and criteria for evaluating a request for a variance are outlined in Section V of this rriemorandum. Specifica!!y, the PEC/DRB roies for variance appdications are as follows: The PEC is respansible for evafuating a proposal for: 1. The ?°elationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and sk ctures ¢rt tFte vicinity. 2. The degree to wh€ch relief from the strict or igterai interpretation and enfor ment of a specified regu€ataan is necessary to achieve compatibglity and unigormity of treatment arrrong sites in the vicinity, or aftain ±he objectives of this Title without grant of special privr[ege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribut€on of popuiation, transportation and traffic facafities; public facilities and utilitiesp and pubiic safefiy. 4. Such ~ther factors and criteria as the Commisseon deems applicable to the proposed variance. The DRB is responsible for evaluating the DR proposal fora - Architectural compatibilifiy with other structuresy the Iand and surroundings - Fitfing buildings into landscape - Configuration of build'sng and grading of a site which respecfis the topography - RemovallPreservatfon of trees and native vegetation gy Adequate provision for sr~ow storage on-site - Acceptability of building materials and coiors - Accepfabiiity of roof eIements, eaves, overhangs, and other bui9ding forms - Provision of iandscape and dra6nage - F'rovesion of fencing, walls, aiid accessory strucfures - Circulation and access to a site incEuding parking, and site distances - Location and design of sateflite dishes - Provision of outdoor Iighting 2 IlI. 3' ~ ENDAT9 N T"he Communi#y Develcapment Department staff recorrsmends approval of the applicanf'ti variance request subject to fihe following findings: °i. Thaf the gran#ing of the variance vvil9 not const~tute a grant of speciad priv9lege inconsister~t with the limitations ora other properties cIassified in the Residentiai Cluster Zone District. 2. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicabde to this site that do not aPPly 9eneraily #o other properties in the Residenfisal CIuster Zone Disfrict. 3. The strict Iifieral interpretation or enforcement of the specsfied regulation wcau8d result in pract6 ! difficuity or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. This recomrr3eradation of ap roval is subjec$ to the fol9owing con ition: 1. 4n order to avoid more irrspact to the siie than is r~~~~~~aryy to ach~~~e deveiopment objec#ives, deve3opment shouad be restricted to the area beIow the 8470' contczur iine, as depicted on the enclosed site plan and survey. IVo Z I iTE STATi T1CS Please note: This variance proposa1 will not affect any developmen# stan r s on #s ropertya Zoning District: Residential CIuster Zone District Lot Size; 31,080 square feefi Bulidable Areao 13,982 square fieet Standard Allowed/Required Proposed G FA; 3,721 sqe ft.* to be defermined Site Coverage 7,770 sq. ft. (25%) to be deterrnined Setbacks Front 20 fte S6des 15 f#, Rear 15 ft. Parking 3 spaces ~ lncludes a credit of 225 square feef for each corsstructed sing1e-farnily unit. ~ ~ V. C IT I A FINDINGS A. Consideration of FactoLs~~~~ 1. T e relations i of t ~ ~equested variance to other existing or otenti I uses and str ct re in t e vicsnity. Staff believes the grant6ng ofi this variance wouEd si ni#icantEy benefit adjacent uses and structuresa iven the proximity of the Victarian Townhouses artd the 1-70 corridorp staff believes the exisfing rnature #rees serve to buffer adjacent properties fram any potential, impacfs of developrrtent of fihis site. Additiortally, an approval of this variartce would al(ow the applQcartt to site the residence parallel to the existing contours and thus r~quire Iess retainage aresund the building footprinte The Town's Design Review Board stated their belQef that this would be a better designa Z `Fhe de r~~ ~o w ic relief from th strict and fiteral inter retation and enforcement of a specifiie re ulafian is necessa to ac ieve co ati ility and unifor ity af treat ent a ong sites in the vicinity r to aftain the objectives of this titie wifihout a rant f specia1 rirriH ea A€though the zon€ng on this fcat is Residential Ciuster (a form caf low- density mulfiiple-family zoning), the proposed use far the property is single-family resgdential. The Tawn freq€aently approves the constructian of singfe-#amily residen son s(opes greater than 40% in other zone districts. A}though ather przaperties in the Residential C6us#er zone district are bound by the 40% sIope restrictiony staff be6ieves the proposed use on this site (singCe-famiEy residential) is unique uvithin the zarae district. Therefore, given the unique rtature of this request and the presence of significant mature vegetation on the "buildab€eP9 portions of this particular Iot, sfaff does not believe an approval of this req~~~t would be a grartt of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on li ht and air, istri ution of popuEation, transportation an tra ic facilities, pu lic facrlities and utiIities, and public safety. Staff does not beIieve there woufd be any negative impacts associated anrith this proposal or~ the above-referenced criteria. B. The PIanninq and Environmentai Comrrtissiora sha61 make the fo[Iowincfindbgs bgtre 1. That the granting of the variance wiEl not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsi~~~~t with the limitafions on other properties classified in the same district. 4 2. That the granting of the variar~~e will not be detrimental to the pubiic heal#h, safety or we#fare, or material1y injurious to propesties csr improvemenfis in the vicinQty. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of'the fo~~owing reasoras: a. The strict Idteral interpretation or er~forcemer~t of the specified regulation vvould result in practi Idifificulty or unnecessary physi i hardship inconsister~t wi#h the objectives of this titIe, b. Wt'here are exceptions or ex#raordinary circumstances or conditions applicabBe to the same site of the variance that do not aPPlY generally ~o other properties in the same zone. C. The strict interpretation or enforcerraent of the specified regulation wot.tld deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other propertaes in the sarrte distrsct. 5 Simte Vimcinity Map 15 4 / 253 ~ / ` 16 ~ 4273 ~ 9 2 ~ 4313 252 CDC1T \ / , 4301 ~ . ~ / GC'>LU0.A81NE 1 \ CQRID65 / S \ I 7 ~ 4342 4295 12 4-~~ $247i" H6IM CONDOS ~ 4375 g \ j ~ 20-1 4352 ~ ~ ~ d234 . \ \ \ % / \ • ~ ~ 4325 4E T. ; E F \ ~ , \ 20-2 4284 \4276 ~ 4W \ ~ 4 4335 ~ COMhhCN ~ t D / 4314 a'' ~ 4316~ TO Q ~ ~ Rl N \ ' ~ 4327 ~ 7 4337 ~ ~ F'i~ ~ , \ 4316 ES~ \ \ \ Z , 49 441e i~ - g 3 4367 4501 \ 4267 ~ 4036 4346 $ Wssr ~ae 9_12 . 2~ 3,! 4295 1-8 \T ~ . ~ .~a°~a~` / 4/5 , / r 4376 4394 426$ z1 ~ 430 1 4424 4508 4A25 ry , 11 i . 3 ~ ~4444 \ . . 427c ~ . . 3 ` . . 4555 . \ G (y, 4 , 12 'V~ 4Q.~i.r. Q~7aF$ . , ' `r?.n,$ ~ N OF VAIL TOW ~ 75 Sou1h Fr°ontcage Roacl . Vail, Ccalrarezdo 81651 970-479-2100 , . FA 970-479-2157 TM AlagLlSt 4, 1999 Town of Va,il P1anning and Environmenta1 Com ission 75 S. Front~~e Rcsa.d Vail, CO $1657 Re. Areqziestfor c~ variance~'i°om Sectrora 12_ 2_ 2, 7'd-wn of T'azl ~ode to adlowfor th~ ~onstrzectzon o, f`a sing1e-familv resadence on a slope in exces,~ of 40% within the Re,sidentzcrl Cdzrster zotze disPrict, Zoc;ated ccl 4355 I3ighor°n Roaia'/ L,ot 3, B1ock 3, Bzghot°n 7hzrdAddiPaon. De PEC Me bers: .At our July 1 " eetixg, the Desagn Review Board (D ) gave the a.pplicant on the above- referenced project, Michael J. I,auterbach, direction to pursue avariance to a.llo for the const ction of a single-family residence csn a portion of his lot with a. ~lope in excess of 40%. After revievd` g the proposed develop ent plan and conducting a site visit to the property, the D feels the presence af significant ature vegetatiorz and ~~tural features on this site w rtS a v iance. As y~u know, many single-family and duplex structures in Vai1' s other residentiai ~one dgstricts may build on slopes in excess of 40% and the I3 fee1s this project should not be hindered by a. technicality zntended for u1tipleAfa ily structures. We believe t~~ grantirzg of this va.riance will result in a better design and a more posltive i pact csn both adjacent properties and the community as a whole. Thank yoaa for your ti e and consideration. Sincer ly, . OAL C1ark Britta.in, Chair Tovan of'Vail Design Review Board RECYCLEII P.APER o-" fV 50°09`0 pW- ~ 147 0 ~ ~ _ _ . . . - . h'..t ' _1\ r i~ - ~s % , - ~ . , J_ ' _ - , - . P'7 f • f ~ ~ J ~f . ~ - C) .c~ . / J . 4"- F: 03 ~ y ! ~ , . ~a0'' ~,,G~ , ~ ` ~ , \\GQJ~ ~ ~ . ~ _ " _ . . _v. . 1 _ G R S 53° 18, 30" `M1 E 9T52 o ~ ~ oj °30„ 5 % C7, (72 --_._j ~ ~ F° , _ ~ - - ~ ' ' _ _ ~ ~ 4~tn' • _ " HORr R 0 A ~ ~ l VtiRlqBv r ~ Fl E R. o. tv. j ` - _ _ ' _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~,.X'~t. ~ • a j~'- _ _v _ _ ~ _ "¢'70 ~ ~ .4 x \$,S \ ~ O~a V ~ J ) ~ 0.a Be~~~ ~ep ---urrr~art.EAI) k ~'}f i > PG,r$orzo~ N A`~S ~ °l~''~ \~"t ~ ~ ~ ~t~~~' {{+~t~°~'~~ ~ ~°',~l \ ~ ~ ~ . ~ i z~3C,q~ ~ w , , ~ 3 i. °~13~ ~A< ) P ~ g3g~.`a~ ~ l~ a , 71 3 ~r i~r~ ~ Arm rsat ~.r ~ nro y°- i ~ MEMORANDUM TO; Planr~~~g and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department D1TMs 3 C. AugusL 9, 1999 SUBJECT; A request for a conditional use permit; to a6low for the estab3ishmenfi of an outdoor patio dining area, located at 244 Wal4 Street / :`~~e Vaii P9ace," a portion of Block 5C, Vaii ViIlage First Fi6ing Applicant: Joe Joyce / Joe's Famous Deli Planner: AIloson Ochs IB DESCRIPTION OF T T J4J6e JVyiaSay 1.h6e VVYftlet 43>$ JVe4s Fa632qpe.d7 Db+ll daJ 3Csq6ALSm7C117g a A3i,.+ifWYt98,/17CAl usLs pbv3613iL i~ ~~~ow d~or the cCeatloi"i of ai7 oL@taooi' pa$1o d9?1i#"lg at`~~ 244 ~treet % "One Va18 Plr'~ce,,, a port]on of BlocK 5C, Vdll Vlilage F3!'st F"134ng. O~~~~or patios are considered a Conditional Use in the CC1 zone district, according to Chapter 12-78-3 (~ERM1TTED AND CONDIT9ONAL USES; F1~'iST FLOOR STREET LEVEL) of i~e T~wn Code, The request is to ailow for six tables with umbrellas and twenty-four chairs as an outdoor dining area during the spring, summer, and fa11. During the winter months, iB tlL applIbaai lt Ps pfi 6dp0dsli ig 4J! dly $.3 X$ Sse tCibl6?il Cd1 94A tYNGlV!w la! !a'd aJ• Aisb°y 18 9e s$'ld4dls thGd. 9 FaY Lu been added to the store#ront counter are included in this conditiona1 use permit application. l°he g C@3 ioutdoor di?~ir~g area is to ~ be located or~ the priv~.te prope~y be#i~ees~ F89 sl SptJ3 C &Jg YCLkI d Oi §e ~da93 Pl["s'D0.dGr= -ry- Ip H!G p9 LJpbei 6y oYY9 7Ls1 9s ltirLLed of ag@ eei 9 6e3 11 C$~3 31.,$ LI 1e CipplOcGi 1$•s pI t1pVsG3 hC$V e bisCin CSLLC1bdhed fbdt fi bs3e9 ei tll+bo. ~i~~;:::•-~ `~;:'.~rv. ~f i ~y2 ' ~ :t^~. ~ ~ . ~ . . ,L . . . . •~:~t7:. ,fi, ` f, 2 9 i. ~l . N.. v.... . . :.:::.q:::::.•.. • _ , . :::.,W~; ~e•i•k"~~•;o-°. . >a~:ac~`~:•:::?:;,, . ~ . 9, . ..`.3. . . . ,~a, ....;~:.~:::.:>:~t>~~:.::•. ~~}a'. ......::,•c,;v.x:.:c:::;;~ .~;::':;~:=:..o-::.>::.:.;y.x,,. ~ „ ::>p..^,:~......:. ..~.w.. . ^ ~.~.~t?;:;.•,•~.:"::;;.;~~:~:::~:+:x:-i>:~;;;:7i::::i$~s:.: . ::'~3'#,.., >:::iK :c:x:~;:.o: ~•.•.~fi.;'~,~•..~.•:~::.,~:.~....~::;o-:;;:;::a: ~ . :.;?.~t<~~~•i~:k;~:.:bk:.~ P ~C..*'~'a~;yn> `t:,~;:;::•s:i:'•".::%.J:::~% `w.^g ,;.,t ~~:.r~.;~:~=;:i%~;°\` t ~ ~~h1,~l+krh;+.tii3;::...:.".riev,f::a r:.,y;. °~Sy:`,,.:`~' ;xv. :>i>~;:',•''.~'•:.~:<..".%;:~:,:bvv,;::~ ~.cx,,;>~;..a....,;.,-.:~.; ~,.n:. .3,~, • ?a .+.~.w~:~ev: '.:o}+,;•;:;:j,;.y.;:k~a::<;~`•>s•$r:+i:tif 's°t`:+,. , le:;~ ? `~.::i,s:,• *~:''~;~'i?;'i%i>;ii:: ~:xs:~:;:>:::`:;. t'v?y:v i:y : ;.r..~.:a#`~f~,.~,~,e::.::,\:`\,?'c`;*°;a:~ :s:t•:~; { ::;~u;:.::.:.:;; <•»s;: '~k~:~ ~'M56 tis~,.. '~'t3:•?:L~:i;:,>.i:tv: ::A':^.:::.::??:~ . ..1..::.:,.. ;att+.. ~,~,e,+~~b~;•a>;.'•:v~:;':i2=::` :;,;'c•»•c:.;% . . , . ..i ,,:i ....,,.4......+...',.......,.,..,...:.. . :..:....r..,,...... . d~ TOWN 4F IAIL ~ ~ 19w TAFF RECOMMENDAi°ION Staff is recomrr7ending approval of the conditior?aI use permit ro allow for the establishment of an outdoor patio dining area iocated at 244 Wal[ Street I "One Vail Place,'9 ~ ~ortlon C~~ ~~~ck 5C, Vall Vlllage F6Cs$ F1l1ng sL€bJ~~~ the follo6IV6ng f6Cdings: 1, That the proposed 6ocation of the outdoor patso dlning area is 6n accordance vvith IL-he purposes of tre conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the CC1 zorte district in which €t as Iocated. 2, That the proposed docation of the use and the conditiorss under whach it would be operated or mairttasned would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or weifare or materiaily injurious to properties or irrt`tprovements in the vicirtity. 1 That the proposed use wJould compdy with each of the app9icable pCovisior€s of the co1lditlonaI Use permit section of the zClnang CC}de. Staff is recommending approvaf of the conditional use permit with the followirag conditions: 1. That the outdoor dining area is on9y permitfied from the first of May to the #irst of Rioverstber, and due to the heavy pedestrian traffic and ski racks lfJ~~~~~ ~ere du3"EC3~ the sefi seasiai3, Clo cauidoor s'~s6n9ng czrecc ~s peiaislt$ed #rom the first of November to ihe first of May. 2. The outdoor dining patoo i~ subject to desigrt review by staff and%or the Design Revsew Board, A16 furniture (€.e, chairs, tabdes, and umbrellas) must meet the iown Code, as approved through the Design Revaew applacatiort, LES AND RES I ILITI F T VI The Plarrrring and E;rvdronmentaf Cornmissr`on is resporrsible tor evaiuatir,g the conditioraal u~e perarrit for. 1 Relationship and impact of t€;e use on deve4opment objectives of the 3 own. ~a Effect of ~~e oii l9g€i$ ania aIr, dPsii!bui~on o€ popufai1C5n, ircnspQftatiun 'faCll#tfeS: ut9litfes9 Se hools; p°c"a€°kS and $`°c3°eaCitJn fac€lEtEes, and otheC publ1c iacifities and public facifities needse =1fect u~on traffic, wdth partscular reference to congestion, automoti3~~ ~edes1rian mafet°~ ard ~,o~s;~enier~ce, i~~f~i~ ~I~~ ~~~t~°01, access, 3a3 s~uvc3"ab9l4~~~ and remoj.lal oI snowf6 om ihe st, eets aCid pa(king areas= Effect upon the char~~~er o# the as;a 'n which the proposed use is to be Iocated, inc;uding the scale and bu€k of the proposed use in relafior~ surrotanding usesa SUCh ~theC 3actors a'1d cr§tetla as the Comm1sS3on dee3`?1S appl6Gable $o the pCoposed llse. The eCll/iC`onfTlental impct~t repor$ CoC1Ce1°nOt~~ the pfopoSed uSe, R~ an envsronmental irripact report is req€aired by Chapter 12 of th?s TQtIe. i. Conformance with development standards of zone distroct 2 T~e Design ~eview Board is re,sprnsible for e,oaluatirg the Design Re+iew application associated with this conditional use permit for: 1. Cornpatibility with other structuresq the gand and surroundirgs 2. P,cceptabiiity of materials and colors of proposed furnitur~ ~ IT IA A FINDINGS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE P 1T The proposal is subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Title 12, Chapter 16. For the P1anning and Eravironmental Comrn'sssion's reference, the conditional use permit purpose statement indicates that: I9d kA80.dC?1 7.o pIVMdtATw thd.e I RLrl4@AXidd(y 38e1/LsaAe7Gdry i4J a\.JhIeV1e i.$Ae %?bjldidl,iYes Vf 9,hIs Leblday specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting c~f a conditional use permit. Becacase of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so that they may be located proper#y w9th respect to the purposes of this title and with respect to their effects on surrounding prcapertiesa The r~~~ew process prescribed in thi~ chapter is intended to assure compatibiiity and harmonious devQlopmerst betrveen conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at 3arge. Uses lasted as conditional uses in the various distr;cts may be permitted subjeci to such conditions and limitations as the ~ own maj/ pCescr3be #o )nsu1°~ th~~ the locc~ion and t7pe1"atIC3n o,~ the conditional u~~s will be in accordar~~e with the developmeni objectives of th~ ~own and wiil not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions canrot be devised, to achieve these objectives, app16cations ior conditional use permits shall be deniede Upon review o# Chapter 16 of the Zoning Reguiatlons, the Community Deveiopment Department recommends approva9 of the conditional ts~e permit request to allow for a6ylow fo/r a restaurar~t e~ryxpar~sior~ and an outdoor dir~irag deck, locate~i at "One 1laal pry 1 iC$Sde'~18dL./be9s FCA@3VLAs b?elly b&.E.7Lrd &.RpOl31 ShYJ @ollSaYYi90g faidtLdls. A. onsideration of Factors 1 n elationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of #he Townm Slaif beiieves the appficant's proposai 3s in con~ert with the 3 own development obiectives and will have min'smal, 'if any, negat€ve impact~ ~n .existing or pot;ntiai uses ;n the surrounding area. ~owever; th~ ~~~~ertisements on t~e umbrela~~ ~~t meei T+tle 11 (Sign Regu~ations) of the Town Code. Staff rp-commending3 ~eview appl4cax3on, that ihe p5~~~sed g1°een umbrs~~~~~ be used ioi all s3x :abies. 2. The effect of '~~e u~~ an l3ght aCgd aiY, d1st3'ibut3o9i of popuiation, transporta#ion fac'slities, utilities, schools, parks an recreation facilities, and other ublic faca#ities needs. Staft bellel~~~ tha$ the propo5al w3~~ ~ave m3Cllm~l negative 3C1'~~~~~~ on the above-described criteria. 3 30 #fect upon trafftc with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety an convenience, #raffic #1ow and control, access, ar~euverabi(ity, and remova1 of snow #rom the street and arksng areasa S$aff bel9~~~~ thei°e will be fi3fniCT1alg 9f any, 4;~~~~ive 9C7'3pac$s oC~ the agbove-descrig'b'ed criteria du~°irtg the s~tp~ f.d.mr~er r~c~r~ths. Ho''wever, durer~g the si<@ adMLla2f !y 11 Y@s 1 7 4~.1 ~ R4g1 ify LrLdi Cge.esCbaV BlrCke Y&s V9 45w of i.f ICa pi 16 8 Bl:Rry Ud+ckrsa7 rouaes tcs the Vista Bahn Ski Lift artd the locatiort of the ii#t ticket office, this is a high9y travei9ed pedestrian rotate. AIso, there is a proiiferation of ski racks Iocated there during the winter months. Staff is recomrr~endirag that the outdoor patio only be allowed between the dates of May lSt io November l'`. 4. ffec# upon the character of the area in hich the proposed use is to be 1ocated, includ'rng the scale and bulk of the roposed use in relation to surrounding usesn Staff believes that the proposal has many positive aspects and #hat the character of the area wifl be enharaced as a result of the proposed outdoor diraing patro, B. fiudim The r aanni5~ 1, 1"hat the proposed Iocation of the use is in accordance with the purposes o1 th~ ~onda$doYlal Uae peCm1$ sec$Qon o$ the z(3nlng code and the plli°p0ses of the distrsct in which the site is focated, 2. That the proposed location of the use and the cond°stions under which it would be operated or madntained wouId not be detrimental to the public health, safi~ty, or welfiare or materiaily injurious to properties or improvemeri~ in the vscinity, I Ttia't the proposed use would compfy witE~ ~~~h of the applicable provissons of the cor;ditional use permit section of the zoning code. 4 a ~ s, }Vh. +~\~R~,\iti'-:~:i-~. w A • ~ i'' . ~ XAytnv; . 4v4.uw~, t tS4:'' .~.Q ' •,,."'•.t':;`>:; ..~~•~~<<«\~«•> , , . ~ 1+4.,1~*'~M'~i.:i~:;v:ii•'.i~'~ :'"'''~.\}`y~`S'i > * .v . wvv ~ .b'~': :k~{::.:<.+.~ :•i; ..+va . , ~ ° t-:.::.;•~::.:•...?.>,,:}~w~,~x;_~?~~ 1;~} ri..P:;a~4.:i:,y:,^;:,^,:,{:.•.:. • - \ . u • J:\•;}';:;y ~ i,::-:::• - . ~.+.y~':~:?i;::::t:}~•'' :':ti~.{G`~'''s'-:' ~.,'T?:iC +•V;::jY+'•v,~~"•~~\':''^`~2<'r''::l~~wi: ; . ' ..R,'~::~;. 4.,:. l ~ i> . „ ~ , . , .to..•;~: ~ ~ The proposed furniture Location of the proposed outdoor dining patio =:tih . , .~,r . R+~ ~ .:::.x::\.._:..;;._.:::._.....:'' . 'wy::~'SS:;?c'iii::r»:~i:,:<is:i:2~:i'•5' :`.~'hi::tijj`tj+,`,',.''~~ . , •,y:.;. { y .z. ~ . . . . . . . . ~^.~.~.~,Yv\.. Currently there are 2 types of umbrellas4 To meefi the provisions of the Town's sign code, staff 6s recommending, as part of the Design Revievv Applicatiora, that only the green umbrellas be permittedn 5 ' - ° ~ 244 Wall St. P.O. Box 6093 ~aii9, Co. 81658 US9As ~~one 970-949_3°~ ~ ~ 9-10-949-3151 juiy 07, 1999 i {3 Va1l P?ar_ ' aa and E:~~~~~~~~~~l C~ im'ss~~n 75 South Frontage Rd. Vaii. Co. 81657 .~~ar Brent WilSonq T? ds letter ~~presen1s a forma1 request to pIu~~ 6 t 7.4 bles and > ~ ~hairs directly iri ftont of First Spori ~f Vail's west entrance, Thi~ ~ll ~ ~ ~pn'ng, surm-nez and faIl. 1 also reques~ ~la~~ tc, '0' ta'~~~~ 122 c:~~~s c'tur'mg ivinter months. ~ ~ ~~~tlis vri~~ to the north of First Spc~~ ~f Vail '-,Q viest entrance. ~ ~efiev~ ~ ~~i-v lxhat ~ fnis area. i~ ~ ~~~~~~ent and attrac*~~~~ ~~r my cus?omers as well as brown bagger; to sit and enj~~ ~~e View ~~e mt~~~~tain. ; iliev mat~~ ~ery weil NIN11th the pedeStn~n a-rea tha:. 'has buif~ ovea the last year. ~s well ihey the tab1e:~ ~!'~a~. I~Ssc. has aa~~'e~3 .d., pi~,c~,:.d ~~a tlaes~° & ~°~3~'~s~ ~e~~1~:~ ~~°~~~~~JJ. ~ '~~5~3 begieve ty'3is vv~~~ ~~-ip ",ft'rit°s .pedesa?"man s~.°~~evy as it ueemS LO s€C`sw dowIn bi.$~~~ ~ that ah rate ~°t s "~j ~!a ~ ~~~~;al. bL~St_~y.~e~' ~s 3_sa ~-''~°'"t I ~ R'~r~*vq~' `.a"~''.sme ~'ai.~~~ ~~i.~ ~~~~.",~'.p€`. "«~t i"i ~ 1~2~,.~ ~w,~' spok.n 'r'='?taA ;,~re `Jery a~~py with, t-Ii1e biSt~~ st-vi~ amb1ance taz~t haS cn~~~eCi ffi thi-s ~ cle acCe t afl a ~~~~ns1;31x1Vy aor ~sC.'I~~~ to i~ these `ab€eS ~lways iri ~1 ae=~t a1201. o;°:~er;s,% ~;annea. :q ~~~ph P, ~o-vce t Mri COMM T. HII 311 Bn'dge Ste Vail. Co, ~ ~ 65-7 0 L1,SA ,June 30, 1999 T~~ of Vai~ 'Manriln ~ and En-~ironment;CoM 9ssi~~ ~~~~h F~~~~~~e Rd, Vail, Co_ 81657 Dear B~-ent ~i~i~son, h%~ ~etter is t~ ~onfi ~ ~~~~ph ~~yce from Joe's.Farnous ~e'il has ~~~~~~~on ~~~c tab~~s ar~ chalis ~ b-ai1d'mg. Thc~ ~~~~~l be ke~'~ ~ ~ an~ orderly ~'~a ~er, dir%-Icti ;T outside m?I -vveSt v~~~ ance to F''~'~~ ~po~~ ~f Vail S1T1~erely, °^vIis. '~."ogtb~d T. Hi1l MEMORANDUM TO; PIanning and Environmenta! Commission FRC7 : Communifiy Deveiopment Department C?ATE; Augtsst 9, 1999 ~~BJEGT: A request for a conditior?aI use permit, to ailow for the creation of a public pafk, loCated at Lots 1,2 & 3, BloCk H, Vr°lil daS ~chofle / 2497g 24$59 2487 Garrnisch and ihe unplafited portion of the SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SE 1/~, S of Section 11, Township 5, Range 81 West, Applicant: Town of Vail PBanner: Aflison Ochs 1. 1 TI T T The T'own of Vail is requesting a conditional use permit in order to con~~~~~t a ne"sghborhood park iocated at the unplatted portion of the SE 1/4, SE 114, SE 1/~, Sp~ 'J~ of 0.d~i0ilibMR 1 11, R VVtlH 7s9 88p aJy 9 1a9lg0.e 81 ~/~iesl C$8 §bA LLJ4J 1y~°p a115~ 3, 43o,A4esk 1 By 4iCSil bd&ta7 V&JAB6J1 36n ! 2497, 2485, and 2487 Garrraisch. The unplatted lot as currently zoned Outdoor Recreation, whi1e fihe thr~~ ~~~s are zoned Residentia1 C1uster. A park is a conditional use in both zone dsstrictsm °The parceI wiIl be re-platted as part of a separate application, On February 19, 1997, the Town of Vail and the Unified States Forest Serarice, entered into ara agreernent to exchange approximateBy 62m268 acr~~ ~f National Forest Lands for approximately 75.02 acres of non-federal lands in Eagle County. The exchange implements the Town of Vail Landownership Adjustment Analysis, and portions o# the T'own of Vail Comprehensive Open Lands Plart. ~~~s unplatted Iot was part of this exchange and was annexed by the Town ofi Vail in April 1999 and zoned Outdoor Recreation, -1 he Town o# Vail purchased four lots, focated at 2497, 24$5, 2487, and 2477 Garmosch, f&ltl@1 4tl'bad fa1799I18.as i@9 1990. @315me pa99R is pSVpLde7eAA 46d be lVIdC$$CelA pC$9liClIly 6d9i loLs A (249I )S 2(2487), and 3(2485). When purchasing these Iots, ~ounci8 identifed them to inc3ude a neighborhood park, open space, or employee housing. The 1994 Comprehensive Open Land Plan states that the lartd should be used for a pubiic use. Neighborhood participation for proposals on this s3te began in October of 1998 and continued through November with neighborhood meetings with designers. CounciI approved the development of six units and a neighborhood park on November 17, 1998. On January 20, 1999 and again on June 16, 1999, the site pIan for the housing was brought to the Design Review Board for a conceptua1 review, On January 26, 1999, Council approved the cancept o# a 4-plex and duplex on t~~ east side of the Iot9 vvith the neighborhood park on the west side of the lots and on the Iand annexed in April 1999a On July 7, 1999 the park was brought to the Design Review oard for a coraceptual review, 1'he park was approved by the Design Review Board at the August 4, 1999 meeting, (See Attached Map) 1 4VAIL TOi~~ O l`he emplayee housing and park will be developed sirrtuitaneously, as part of the same development ~~am. The app6icant's ;etter has been attached for reference. ~lo STAFF I The Community Develapment Department recommends a roval of the conditional use permit for a neighborhood park, subject to the fo81owing fi irt se 1. That the proposed Iocation of the use is in accord~~~e with the purposes of the conditaonal use perm€t section of the zoning code and the purposes o# the district in which the s6ze 6s focated. 2. 1"hat the proposed locatiort of the use artd the conditions under which it wiII be operated or maintained w0li not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or weifare or materialEy injurious to propert€es or improver~ents iro the vicinity. 3, That the proposed use will carnply with each of the applicable provisions of the condit6ona[ use permit sect6on of the zoning code. l11L E ILtT VI I - BOARDS 1°he Pfanrting and Envaronrnerrtal Commissirzn fs responsible far e valuating this corrdftional crse permit applicatiort far: 1 . Relationship and impact of the use on development abjectives taf the Towrt. 20 Effect of the use on 6ight and air, d9stribution of population, transportation facilities, utflitiew, schools, parks and recreation fac€lities, and other publsc facilities and public facilities needs. 3e Effect upon traffgcq with particular reference to congestion9 automotive arrd pe&d4+a7LCtQi 6 sC$tGly C&! Pd lI'ddB 6iCGrI 6@ed W6r6Cq Lra1&@6J fBBJMV a4 td be6dE 84C131y G$t+cessg maneuverability, and remaval af sr~ow frorrt the streets and par€c€ng areas. 4m Effect upon the character of the area an which the proposed use is to be Iocated, including the scale and bulk o# the proposed use in relation to surrounding usesa 5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The env€roramenta( arnpact report concerndng the proposed use, if an env°sronmentai impact report €s required by Chapter 12 of this T6tie, 7, Conformars~e w€th deve9apment standards of zone distri~t Tire Design Revtew Board is responsible for evafuating the Desigrt Review app6icatron for; 1. Architec;turaE compatibiBity with other structures, the land and surraundings 2. Fitting buildings irtto Eandscape 3m Conf°sguration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography 4. RemovaI1Preservation of trees and native vegetation 50 Adequate provision for srsow storage on-site 6. Acceptability of buifd[ng materials and coiors Rcceptability of roof e6ements9 eaves, overhangs, and other bui6deng #orms 8. Provision of landscape and drainage 2 9, Provis9on of fencing, wal4s, and accessory structures 10m Circul;tio n and 2ess to a sate including parking9 and site distances 11, Location and design or satellite dishes 12. Provision of outdoor lighting 13s The design o# parks The Design Review Board approored the Design Review appiication at the August 4, 1999, rneeting with the foIlowirag conditionsa 1. 1"hat the conditional use permgt be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission. 2. 1"hat final Design Review Board approval is required of the pavilion, sagn, and piay equipment. 3. That esther parallef or front-end parking is acceptable. !V. N 1 1 !t is the Planning anti Environmenta8 Commission°s roie to revsew the proposed use of the site as a park, The #ollowing are d`ascussion 6tems pertaining to the Planning and Env'sronmental Commission's role in reviewing this Conditional tJ~~ ~ermifi: A. ark l e ts to includen F?estroom Multiple Play Structures Picnic Shelter 4 Parking Spaces ADA Accessible Path One Handicapped Parking Sp~~e Open Turf Area B. elalcle Access The park is proposed to have 4 parking spaces and one handicap parking space within the parking 1ot fior the employee housing comp9ex. The focar parking spaces are head-in parking places. C. edestre n Access Pedestrian access wiHI be provided to a19 structures and p1ay equipment, meeting ADA requsrements. D. fentla/ C1 fft The propC3~~d pai'k w9lI pt{)1/lde act9Ve aYld pc3sa31/e park llses prlCTiaflly the neighborhood. There are children's play areas provided for msaltiple age groupso A restroom and picnac shelter have also been provideda All structures and play equipment are accessibie per ADA requirerrjents. V. V1 1T IF TI 3 The review criteraa fior a requesfi of this nature are estab9ashed by the Town of 11a6i Municipal Codem The ArosalGarmisch Park is 1ocated in the Outdoor Recreation and Resident6al Cluster zone dastrict~. The proposa1 is subject to the i~suance of a conditiona3 use perm°st in accordance w1th $he p(ovis9ons o$ Title 12, Chap$er 16a FoC Planning aCld EnvIfont71eCital CoC?'lm1s51on's reference, the conditional use permit purpose statement indicates that: 3 in order to provide the flexib'slity necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified uses are perm6tted irt ~ertain distrrcts subject to the granting ofi a cortditionaf use permita ~cause of their unusuaf or special characteristics, condEtiona1 uses requ'sre review so that they may be located properly with respect ta the purposes of this tit€e and with respect to their effect~ surroundir? properties. The reariew process prescribed in this chapter is °rntended to assure compatibi9ity and harmonious deve!opment between conditional uses and surrounding properties sn the Town at large. lJses Ifsted as conditional uses in the var~ous district5 may be permitted subject to stach conditiorts and 1imitations as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the condit°sonai ~~~s will be in accordance with the deve1opmenfi objectives of the Town and w`sEl rsot be detrirr?ental to other uses or properties. here condit€ons cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives, applicatiorrs #or conditiona4 use permits shal{ be denied. A. nsi r tion f actorsm 1 a eI tionship art impact of t e tase ort the development o jec#ives of th T n. This neighboncood has b~en identified as in need of a neighborhood park in the Comprehensive Open Lands Planm Through numerous neighborhoad meetings, participartts have identified the need for passive and act°sve park uses. Staff believes that the propasa[ #o4lows the deve4opment objectives of the Town of Va6ln 2. 3°he eff ct of the use on [i t and a°sr, istri tion of popul tion, trarts rtatiort fciIities, utilities, schools, ar s rt recreation facalities, and ot er public facilities needs. The proposed park wiEl fui#iil a. Iong-stated need for a neighborhood pocket park in the West Vai1 neIghborhoods. The park wil1 have no effect on the other above- mentior€ed criteria. 3e ff ct u ara traffic wit particuiar r ference to congestion, automotive an pedestrian safety and cortvenience, #raffic #1 and contr 1g access, maneuverability, an removal f sno from the street an arkin areasm Staff believes that the proposed neighborhood will not have a negative effiect on the above referenced criteria. There are four proposed parking spaces9 aIong with a hand~cap parking space proposed in conjunction with the housing eIement, vuhich wilf be designated as park parking. 4. #fect upon the character of the area in hich the roposed use is to be locate g including the scale an bu€k ofi the roposed use in retation to surrounding useso Staff believes this use will have a positive impact on the character of the neighborhood by providing open space and recreational activitCes for the neighborhood. AIH of the proposed structures on the sste will be integrated 6nto the sECe. B. 1 it'1 s 4 °The Planni~ nvironmentaI o ission sh Il ke the follo in fin ings before ranting a conditi nal use per ita 1. That the proposed 9ocation of the use is in accord with the purposes of the conditional use permit section o# the zoning code and the purposes of the dsstrict in which the site is Iocafied. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which ~t would be aperated or maintaaned would not be detrimenta4 to the public heaith, safety, or welfare or materiaIly injuraous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed ~~e would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use perrnit section of the zoning codew 5 - , , ~ , _ , ' ; r 3 f ` ~ ~ ~ 1 Nr gl~~'~~"r ~ ~ - ~ ; , - ~ "I~I```~ ~ I'V . - L . ~ f_Vb _ _ ~ `7 ~ _L>~ 1~1 _ , I; I J i I ~ ~ , z i _ . : - . , . - - ~ ~ j- iv- NVtVQI J~iy_ w ~ - - - I - _ _ - _ - - - _ _ - _ - ~ 0 -T i ~ ~ ~ - ~ ;n~ Il'~•' ~ ~ i°c'~s ~ ~ ' ~ ~ " i~ . . ~ , ' ~ ' y ~j'~ ! j /J .1 `-ita~~= i / ~ " ' ) / , , ; ~ ?7 E ~t l : ~ /.i j ' ~ " - ~ , ~ i ~ I ~ :l..~J•-)Cl ~~.+Y"*-',Gii4 Ci.~w>~ ~ X ,k 4~OA. P~ ~ /F , Soake 1" ~ 20' I N 6' lo' 20' 40' ; ~ - War CONCEPT PI.AN~ ~ fiRQSA GARMiSCH ----1 1IAgK I ~ ~ Townm a ~ ~ rc~a~P64~~ nnrE: RKwlIM ¢ 4 ~ ~ Arosa/Garm'ischPark Slote 4 2~4# 2447 ~ ~ L) ttJ 3 2455 2.4 5g; g ~ 7 2457 ;d_465 2 ~^~:~mm:,s>s 6 2466 0 . . . : ; . . . : : : . . „ . . - ..v . . ~ ~ ~ 5 z i.:.?. • . ..:.5:~ • : . ~ : . ~ • • : ~..p,.~ .:.:::.:;r>..;;p•;:~.:~••.;>:..,:..::.~:::.:. ~ : v::;;: : • : . v. . . . . ~ . .........:.:.::.::.::n;... ~.,.:.:•:~.~~:':::::~;ti'.::~:.:•:~:.:.':•~`:. . . 24'q . ?:S+< P 5 ^ ;:::::i~, 28 ~ 2476 27 :3 ~ . 2478 1.4.9 26 ' 2 4 2439 r 248£3 2,7 ~r ?447 ~ ~ 2507 2556 12 ;?498 13 3 4 , 11 2449 2517 2508 2440 f 2572 k N 1 10 2582 ~4 ~ ~ 2 3 2516 2457 2444 ~ 2 ~ 2566 ~527 ?56.a w ~ . < W Ei s Arosatl~ar i~~ ark T'own of VaiI. June 14, 1999 Project Descr°i `on: Rela#ionship and i pact of the use an deve3~~ ent objectives of the To~~~ ~e fiiture Axc~sa-C isch p° k will serve the adjacczat -neighborhoods, th beco ` g a destinataon for ne by resaderzts. Due to ttic use of siie as a p k, negative ° pacts r~n the region a.s weiI a.s the e,o °tyy wilI be negligibleA The proposed p kwzll have a n be> of s'-s rang:ng fro passzve overlookss to zque pIay features for chiIdren of v 'ous agesq A shel#ex includ' g restz°oca facxlitzes wil1 acco cadate larger groups 20 peopie). The proposed p k is located at the zntexsection of Axosa Drive and Drive aWest Vail. "I''ae terz°ain oF -the park is ;ently sioping near the street #r sitica ` g to very steu~ oxi the north po .on of the site. On t~~ no east side saft.he szte is a To of VaiI affar bI~ heiis' g comp1~x accussible fro G _ isch Street4 H dicapped acC°ss to sheiters d play areas i be x~~chabie fro the affordable housing complex. addatzona.I h dicapped -a 'g spa~e may be added to the proposed parkzno, lot adja~ent to thas co plexe Effect ~ ~ on light and a° , dis ibution of population, trans o tian facilities, u#ilities, schools. parks and recrea#ion facilities, and ~ther public fac° itzes and pubLic Of2cilifies needso 'De i tent of ~ l-, is for the siie to remain ' ope-n `th mi ' a1 s ct-aresm As a besult, #.hexe wzl1 be rzegligzble envzz°onmental ' pacts w-ih respect to I~ghi, ` , d pollutzons The primary users of t.his p k °11 typically be wz ' w `ng, distance. 'I1ae p k's location str~ngthens the connectio ~eri pZZivate a d public users. A pedes ' bridge is pxoposed at Cnz°~ina L e dnking the Arosa-Garniisch park tca the ho to the westd T'he proposed restroo facz1ity is to be small (~ne to ~o i1xitzza°es) arci wi11 ozzly ha~e a minor ~mpact upo~ utilitv jiceds and cosis. A portion of tlze szte will rzeed i~~-rz~~.tic~rs frar the ~°~awing season, These neecis would'ne met with an autornated dex=-T-rc~uz$d zrrigation systemm Effect -upon tx°affic, with pa "cu~ar refer~nce 1o congestion, ~~~omotive ° d pedestrian 4afetv ;znd c~~~~~ience, traffic f1€~~~ ~~d cantru1, access, m~ne~~erab' °ty, and oval of sno~~ frx3 the streets anci ~arkin~ areaa Si.4ta:~q ::{it; °Z"Ii1~3t°~% il`~~ C;~ ,r 1` yqr\ L~ 1r . 1~fI .r~yn cY~ryTf~ty-~ .4~ ~-y Y~} ir5 i ~J w :il ~-~~j1V~+'Jh.Oa ~'4Attl ~.'y~Al~ `'4Cb~li.1~1~'ja ~~A.J~LAAC.~._ .~91ddv ..AS~~ISs+.:LC..~ kf~at the paxk ~;ffe;;, on con-estican, 'Umfic flow; etica aL ;he Axosa-CTarmisch intersection wiil ~e 4ni ' ala With people c:ossina strelts W reach t1ie~ar?-~, pedestri~ safe~v vvill I~e care~izl1~ considered, howeve.9 fe$aa prob~ems a.r~ expedted due to tbeir 1. ,ted tr °co W ffect upon the c arac#er of ~ ~ area ° which the pz°aposed use is to be_ locafe ° clu ' g the sca1e a~~ ~~e prra os~~ -use ` re #ion to surroun i ases. ~~~ause the propcsseci use is a public park zts re?ation to s o d3ng es °Il be a posztive orsea It is picuIarly true in this case due to the soundi~g usse being Pri °Iy residential neighborhoods. 'I°llie scale ofthe projecv is sa11 enough to not have de `ental i pacts yet still capa.ble €~f m~eting the recz°eationa1 needs of r,eighboring residents dtheir f zlies, Tne pl xs for the p k ci acco p yi~g architecturad elevation-s are irLendeid tca be preE `rz . Add`zzAorzal stuciies daIterszatives `Il be developed tb-e park evr~lveg. I°hese drawiszgs are included in orde:' to convey ~°~e design zntent for the p k d zts aenities. . 0 LAw OFFicEs A~~ ~ ° UNN, ABPLANALP & MAtaRIELLO, P.C. ~mA PRCJFESSIONAL CORP6RATIOPJ JONN W. DUNN WESTSTAR BA9Jt( BUiLDIhIG YELEP}10NE: ARTHUR A. ABPLAhiAL6; JR. 108 SOUYN Fraorara.cE Roeaca VVesT (970) 476-Q30C7 DlAAtE FiERt+1AN A9AU3?lEL1.0 S VlT~ 30C9 FACSIM4~E: CARRiE NEY~DCJN O'NE1L (970) 476-4765 V'4IL, C`~~°OR'~°O 81657 e-mai): vai!!aw@vai).net OF ~OUNSEI.: JLRRY W. HANPIAH CER4IFIED LEGAL ASS7S7APdT5 4(A.R£PJ M. pUPJBd, CLAS 6 August 1999 JANICE K. SCoFtELO, CLA r. ussell Fores~ irector m aI'o-A in c~~ Vail epar~t ent of ~ommunity Develop ent 111 Sou Frontage Road West Vail CO 81657 Re4 Vail Potato Patch/Carnie °Tract ear Russs Our Firm represerzts Dome Invest ent Grou ("31ome"), the ovmer of Potato Patch Condo iniu tTnit Noa 11, and r. and rsw George Ireland. ("Irel ds"), the ovmers of Potato Patch Condominiu Llnit Nog 16. o ers of Potato Patch condo " °u s, our clients are also owners caf uzxclivide interests in the general co on elements of the Potato Patch Club and the driveways and open space ithin that rojectA ur ciients have askecl that we contact the To of Vail on their behalf in associatzon ' possible proceedings hich ight be izxitiat~d by Mrn and rso John C 'e an /or Mrm ichae1 I.wauterb~ch, caz° one or ore other rndividuals or entitzes on their behalf, in effo to cievelop the property to the east of tkZe Potato atch Club and owned by ra and rsa Carnxe (the "Car °e Tract"), y such request by C 'e or Lauterbach ou1 presu e access ~cross the gener common e1ements associateci ' e Club and o ed in co on by e con o iniu ~ ersg T is access has not een g-ranted. We un erst d that the sociation has given or °il be . ,ng zts own per °ssion for access, upon the satisfaction of a n~ ~r of crsnditzonso The Association cloes not o the land aver hich the praposed access road passes d does not ave the authority of the actual owners to grant any such righta In the event of an a plication for the subdi °sion and/or deveIop ent of the C ee "Tract, it see s apparent at any suc proposed tract ill re uire not only subcii asiorz and esign re °ew approval, but also variances relatecl to construction of access rc~ad and fireJs ety issues, partzcularly relate to curve radii and emergency accesss Although, f~r reasons noted e1o , no appiication relating to the Carnie T'ract shoulc3 reach eitl~er e pu lic hearin stage or ad i °strative consideration, our e ~ ciients ish to have the To n a are of the fact that they object to the grant of any variarzces relating to the Carnae Tract, hether aci inistrative or pursuant to pub1ic he inga y such v iances, and particulariy those re1ated to fire/safety an emergency access, '1l jeopardize the safety of their own residences, as e11 as any res3dences or other i provements hich ight be const cted on the Carnze T'ract~ ~ appIication relating to the Carnie Tract shouI not reach the point of receiving aci inistrative or public h~aring consideratione It is our un erstandzng tha~ e To ofVail '11 not process any application foz° subdi `sioni variances, or deszgn revaew without the consent of e o z~ers of the lands incluclec1 ithin any such applzcation. The C nie 'I'ract is ithout accessA ro and rs. Carnie have initiatecl litagation in the Ea~1e Cc~un~ Dist?°ict Court in ar~ ef~c~~°t to ct~n~ie s~ access acrc~ss the Potato Patch Clutaa c~ ~an Ire1 s have been name in that action and, like other owners of untli `ded interests in the co can e1ements, they are contesting the condenmation ci ` o ecau5e a11~ ~ppI1Catio21 for s11bd7 'sion, variance or design review re1axing to the deve1opment of e C nfe Tract ust resu e access across the common elements of t e Potato Patch Club or some other pro erty, our clients feel that it is appropz°iate to ca11 to your attention the fact that the consent of aIl o ers of the affected d inclu ed prope , specifica11y, t e co on eiements of the Potato Patch C1ub, cannot and i11 not be obt °neei a€ad/or su °tte s ather than have the Vaii ep ent of Co un;ty Development cievtate time to a project hic has not receivect and cannot recei~~ e required consent of the property owners, our cIients 'sh to bring this deficiency t~ ~our attention at is early ciate. If yo~ are not in agree ent it this analysis, or if eTown of Vail 'll e or is processin any a iication relate to the Carnie Tract °thout e consent of e owners of e property upon which access relies, e re uest to be a °sed of that fact. e so request to be a °sed of y app1icatiorz receive by the To n of Vazi relateci to the C 'e Tractm tho€~~~ ~ ~~al, dhere is no requirement for public notice of some stages of "To of V"ail consi eration, e hope that the inclusion of thzs letter in e To 's fi1e relatin to the C nie Tract i11 ro pt notification xn the event applfcation is receivecle If an event occurs hi~h requires public notice, e request at, in a dition to the notice iven to the Potato atch Club sociation, that our clients be pro 0cte ia co y of that ncrtice, sent roxz our ece. Because of e possib1e znvoive ent of the De art ent of Pu lic Works an t~~ Vail Fire Department in y processing of sub ivzsion, variance and design re °e applications, our clients have re uested that e pro °de those dep ents, as we11 as e Pl an En °ronment Co ission an the Design Re "ew Board ith copies of zs 1ettere ~ ~ Thank you for youz° consideration of this request, an for the °Ilingness of your Department to consi er the con~erns of those o e represent. Vezy truly yours, TJ p ~ & , C. ~ uz°A.~ A.l~ 1~n~1 , Jrv xc9 o__e Invest ent Group z°m and rsg eorge Ireland rm Greg Hall, irector, Vail epartment of Public or ra ick Gulick, Fire Chief, To rz of V°I r. Ci Iz rittain, C 'r , esign Re °e oar ro John S ofiel , Ch °r an, lanning and En °ron e ta1 Co ission , ~ ~ Approved Augus# 23, 1999 PLANNING ANC3 ENV1€~ON ENTAL ~OMMlSSlON Augusfi 9, 1999 M"tnt~~~~ ~~~~ERS F'RESENT- MEM~ER~ ~~~ENT. STAFF PR~SI'ZNT: John Schofield Brent W'slson Galen Aas9and A11ison Ochs Diane Golden Judy Rodrlguez Brian Doyon Tom Weber Cfaas Bernhardt Doug ~ahili ublic H12gLinA 2a D . A Jo$ln ~chofield c~~led #he meetin{~ to flrdef a$ 2a00 p.mm 1 . A reqt.7e5~ ~or a condikE43nal i.3 s~ peYfC71t, $fl allow th£ es$abl1shmen$ of ail 0u$~oor patfo dining area, located at 244 Wa1P Street / "~~e Vai# F'3ace,,, a ports'on of B1ock 5C, Vai1 Vi3lage F°srst Filings Applicant: ,~~e Joyce l Joe's F'arnous Deli P1anrsera Allison Ochs AIlison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo. John Schofi~~~ ~sked if the applacant had anything to add. Joe Joyce sa?d he was hoping for the option to have 3 tables in ihe winter cioser to the Popcorn Wagon, deperading upors the ski rack setup. He said the other merchants were haPPYw9th the sense of the Bistro sett4ngn John Schofield asked ior any public input. There were no public comments. Doug Cahil9 asked how trash was taken care of. Joe Joyce said he strove to keep the area spotless, so they were on tcsp of that. D(}Li{~ ~ahill Sai~ two tables V+JC7uld iit IC3 that aYea. Jcae Joyce said if it wor€cedq everyone ;~ouid be in favor of threea He said it was a sma9l area and i# three tables didra't work, then there wQuld be two. He said he was thinking more in ferms of sprsng. 1 Pfanning and Environmenta! Cosnmission Minutes ?ugust 9, 1999 ~ Approv~d August 23, 1999 CF6CAs B6.s8nha9Ydt ac7k4b.i 61p ra(,he9 9.haP6 a b%CC8?keL isVii0.dfl60.dn(Ai LIs3Ceq 4?314.9ld thC? PE++J gitl4 p6s§4pStlsa7/Cin fVI o tab9es and then have it revlewed. John Schofiie!d said the PEC did have the option, the way the mafion was crafted. Allison Ochs said a condition coufd be attached for a review at 6 months or a year. Diane GoIden asked how th~ number of tables was arrived at. Joe Joyc_e explained, but saEd he would be comfortable with two, Diane Golden said st wouId be easier to take a table away. Tom Weber sadd his concerns were dur;ng winter use when peopl~ ~ould sit at the tabies to remove ski boots, F€e said he would be in favor of fooking at this again mid-winter or rev1ewing it in 6 ~onths. Brian Dayon said he was in favor of this, as it was an appropriate use. We said the appiicanti could determine how many tabies t~ou(d work and the number shouid be Ieft up to the applicantm Galen Aasfand said the use should be Iess in the wintere John Schofbeld said he was in fa°vor of a 1-year issuanceg 1etting the applicant regulate th~ number of 'tables, with staf# reviewing st irs the busy season. Brtan Doyon made a motion for approval in accordance weth the staff memo, with condition #2 amended to read that the conditional use permit was for up to six tables, and reviewed by staff after ane year,. Tom Weber asked to have the motion amended to aIIow or€ly 3 tables a Brian Doyon said no to the amendment; that #he applicant could make that determinatior~ Tom eber seconded the motian. The rrrotion passed by avote of 7-0. 2. A, request for avariance from Section 12-2-2, Town of Vai1 Code to a11ow for the construction of a single-family res6cfence on asEope in excess of 40% uvi#hin the Res€dential Cluster zone district, Iocated at 4355 Bighorn Road / Lat 3, Block 3, Bighorn Third Additgon. Appl€cam Michael J. La(iterbach Planner: Brent Wilson Brent',1Vifson gave ar~ ~~erv€ew of the staff memo and stated that there wete no geoiogic hazards on this property. John Schofiedd asked if the app4icant had anything to add. 2 P4anrrir,g and Environmentai Comsnission Mgr:utes E1unust 9,I999 Approved August 23, 1999 Michael Lauterb~ch said if the PEC want to save the trees, thera ~e would bui1d around them, but they would becorrae diseased and die anyway. John SchofieBd asked lior any pubiic irapute Lana Doty, a property owner next door, asked why the Tovv~ ~anted it in thas 1ocation, as it would aesthet6cally Iook better further down the iot. John Scho#ielci said that would be for the Desigra F~eview Board to decide. Brer~t Wilson said ther~ would be no impacts. L~~~ Doty said she was ir~ favor o# putting it Iower, Tom Weber said the proposed variance vud6d impact the site Iess and save the majori#y o€ trees and he stated that there uvas no speciai privilege beirtg gaven to the applicant, Brian Doycan agreed with Tom, bu# had concerns regard°sng the parking requ'srements and the access fcar the road adjacent to the property. He suggested getting the roads to line up, raYher than be offset on the south side. Michae! Lauterbach said the roads were 100 yards apart. Gaien Aasland said the applicant uvas r~~~ ~sking for any relief frorn setbacks and this application was consistent with fihe Town Code, Doug Cahiil saad he was in agreement with his fellow Comassioners, but to try to save the trees, Chas Bernhardt said this was a w9n-wsn situataon v+rith minimal impact. He said the drivevvay would need to have pr6or approval from the Town Eng3neer. Diane Goid~n agreed with her #eIlow Cammissiortersa Johra Schofiel~ said a 40% s9ope created a hardship and variances could be grant~d with such a steep s6ope. Tom Weber made a motion fior approvalq in accordance with the staff memo with the modification to the condition that the development should be restricted to the area below the 8470' contour line, "as de#ermined by the Design Rev~ew Board," Doug Cahili seconded the motion. The motion p~~~ed by a vote of 7-0, 3. A request for a conditional use permit, to a!low for the creaticn of a pub9ic park, 1~cated at L~~s 1,2 & 3, Block H, Vail das Schone/2497, 24859 2487 Garms~ch and the unplatted portaon o# the SE 'l4, SE 1/4, SE 1/~, SU1' ~J~ of Section 11, Township 5, Range 81 4'Vestn 3 Pianning and Environmentai Commission Nlarzutes August 9, 1999 Aoplicant; T'own of Vaily represented by Todd Oppenheim~r Approved August 23, 1999 Pianner: Allison Ochs AIlison Ochs gave art overrievv of the staff memo, John Schofie9d asked if the applicant had anything ta adda -g'odd Oppenheimer said he went from paraldel parking to four head-in parkcng spaces, as the PEC at the Iast meeting expressed concern regarding the parallei spots in #he right-of-vuay. Greg Hali ta8ked abo€at traffic flow. John Schofield asked what made this safie, because if it was a residential fot9 it uvould not be alEowedn Greg Ha9l said the wintertime use vvas minimal. He said Red Sandstorte Park and Bighorn Park wer~ just used for sncsw storage in the winter. John SchofieEd said the residenteal standards discouraged backing into the right-of- way, Greg F#all said if 'his was not on any bus routes, cars are aIlowed to back out , according to the startdards, unless it ~erved a mu!#i-family or 3 unit building. Ton-i Weber stated cars wouldn't be doing a u-tuYn when backGng outa Greg Hal1 said cars parked at a park don't stay for 8-10 hours at a t€me and signag~ ~ould be simiiar to Bighorn Park. I odd Oppenhe?mer said persona€ly he didn't like this configuration. He said they cauId #it one more space inq for a totai of 3 parai3el spaces ora Arosa and thai the employee ho€ssing didn't want park parking ciose to them. Allisart Ochs ment;oned that the DRB was in favor of either parking congiguration. John Schofield asked for any public corr»nent. There was no public comment. Dcrug Cahi(l asked any pubEic has comrriented so far, Todd Oppenheimer said the neighbarhood wanted to minimiz-- the parking. Diane Go4den said she was gr~ ~avesr of the head-in parking. She said it vreas safer, sance the dorr~ wnen open with parailel parking, virouid Yrave the children getting out into the street. Q odd Oppenheimer sa€d, as a rule, the Town doesn't masntain or plow parks irr the winter. GaIen Aas(and said h~ aclreed vvath Diane Go6den, who is aEways right. Chas Bernhardt said he liked the paralleI parking bettera He feit it was safer, as there was so little tra#fic and the trunk wouId be unloading into the street. Plar~nirrg ar~d Environrrrer~ta[ Comrr~issic~n ~ Minutes August9, 1999 Approved August 23, 1999 Doug Cahi1i said he was in favor of the straight-in parking. Greg HaIl said he was in favor of parallel parking. Bob Mcl.aurin said most of ihe traffic is spfit 2/3 and 1l3 up 'Lowards the park, as #here was no destinaiion. Torn eber ~e was in favor of pu3i-in par4singo Brian Doyon sae~ ~e was not in favor of the new park design and was much more in favor of the parallei parking, Galen AasIand said he was againsf the paraliel parking on Garmisch, as it vva~ unsafe. Jgir ohn Schg~ 1 iiw ofield~y said he ~vas in favc~ry of yhead-ir~ parkir~g, since the Gar~raisci~ site had less traffic, 3 A sGAi~A d84A9 &93. Ytlad 0t t1 0L T4JV'dY 1 Vf 4 K:8.0& PS1d kis giV el d Jp%.+Llal &sVA SsidLA G81o9 !n Chas Bernhardt made a mot3on for approval for th~ ~ew design wath parallel parking on the east side w4th 3 spaces on Garmisch. Braan Doyon ~~~onded the motion. John Schofield asked for any further di~cussior~. Diane Goiden said head-in parking was rnuch safer. dtte 1$781t141t7 Nkas id6a9Cad$1.S1bd 5`2y w9C91 6?r9a78 C.10Sd i1has3 911 1[1MSJ& Cd&9d i?8a95e9 Ad6989i3y DCd3Agy #O1§49 CAC$l,3 ~~~en (7pposede Gaden Aasiand made a motion for approvad #or the nevw design with head-in parking and a total of 5 spaces, Diane Golden secflnded the motiono The motion passed by a vote of 5-2, with Chas and Brian opposetia 4. A request ~~r a vvorksession for arrjendrxaents to Title 12, Zoning with respect fio Empioyee Housing Unit Standards, Minimum Lot Size Requiremerat in the Primary/Secondary and Two-Family Residential Zone Districts and aite Couerage atandards. AIso, a proposal for a new zone district ent:t(ed Af#ordabie Housrng (AH) Distr€ct. AppllcaC3t; Tow?1 o$ Va9l P9anner; Dom6~~~ ~auriellolGeor~e Ruther TABL TIL AUGUST 23, 199 5, A request for a minor subdaviuion, fio vacate common [ot fines #o cr~~~~ ~ ~ew lot, iocated at 2477, 2435, 2487, 2497 Garmisch [7rivel Uots 1-4, Block H, Vaii Das Schone #2. 5 Planning and Environrr,erstai Commissfon iviinutes Augusa 9, 1999 ~ ,4~~us~ ~3, 199~ Applicar~t: To+~vn of Vaif, represer~ted by fVir~a Tirr~rr~ Approv~ PIanrser: AIlison Ochs T L TIL AUGUST 2 , 1999 Br~an Doyon made a motion to tab4e iterns #4&5 unt?l August 23, 1999. Chas Bernhardt seconded the motiono The rnotior€ passed by a vote of 7-0, ~cahrs Schof0eld statec~, to Iet the recc~rd reflect, that a Ietter frorr~ Art A~bplar~a?p 3~ad beer~ received dated August 6, 1995 regarding the Carnie Tract, but that the Carrsie Tract was nat on the agendam 6m information llpdate 7. Approvai of July 26, 1999 minutes. Chas Berrthardt made a motion for approval of the msnutes as amended. Doug Cahi64 seconded the motion. The mot€or; passed by a vote of 7-0, Diane GoIden made a motion to adjournA Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. The meet€ng adjourned at 3:10 p.ma 6 Plann'sng and Enviranmentai Gornmission tVlinutes August9, 1999