The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000-0410 PECTHIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY ~=~UBLIS~~D PUBLlG NOTICE NOTICE IS 'HEREBY GiVEIV that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-fi of the Municipal Code of tike Town of Vail on April 10, 2000, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the cansoGdativn of two units within the CC1 Zone District, located at 225 Wall 5tree#fLot B, C, Black 5C, Vail Village 1~~ Filing. Applicant: Eugene Fahey, represented by Sally Brainerd, RKD, Inc. Planner: Allison Ochs A request for a work session to discuss a proposed major amendment tia Special Development District #4 (Cascade Village), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West (Glen Lyon Office Building)fLat 54, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Dundee Realty, represented by Segerberg Mayhew Architects Planner: George Ruther A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a proposed expansion at Vail Mountain School, located at 3160 Katsos Ranch Road/Part of Lat 12, Block 2, Vail Village i2t~' Filing. Applicant: Vail Mountain School, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Architects Planner: Brent Wllson A request for a variance from Sections 12-6D-9, 12-6D-$ and 12-6D-6, Town Code, to allow for a garage and residential addition, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Let 6, Block 6,Vail Intermountain. Applicant: Alan & Francine Peters Planner: Allison Ochs A PEC review of proposed modifications to the Gore Greer Flood Plain, located at the Gore Creek Whitewater Park, Gore Creek PromenadelTracts I & A, Block 5B, Vail Village 1~t Filing. Applicant: Vail Valley Tourism and Convention Bureau Planner: Brent Wilson The applications and information. about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published March 24, 2030 in the Vail Trail. > ~, ~~ ,~ ?YAWN {JF YAIL ~ 1 THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY G1VEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Tory Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-5 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on April 10, 2000, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for four Type III and one Type 1V EHU's, located at the Vail Athletic Club & Spa, 352 East Meadow Drivels part of Tract B, Vail Village First Filing. • Applicant: Ran Byrne, d.b.a. VML, L.L.C., represented by Tom Braun Planner: George Ruther The applications and information about the proposals are available far public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published March 27, 2000 in the Vail Dailey. ~. ~i Ttl49h' I}F PAIL ~ ..' PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE Monday, April 10, 2000 AGENDA Project Orients#ian 1 PEC LUNCH - Community Development Department MEMBERS PRESENT Site Visits 1. liatsos Bike Path - Tract A, Vail Village 12`x' 2. Fahey-225 Wall Street driver: George NQTE: If the PI=C hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from. 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. A GB~~~y~o 11.30 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Public Hearinq s Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. Swearing in of reappointed PEC merxtbers Diane Golden, Galen Aasland and Brian Doyon, -Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk. 2. Ejection of 2000 C>aair Vice-Chair -- 3. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow far the consolidation of two units within the Wall Street Building, located a# 225 Wall Streetll_ot B, C, Block 5C, Vaii Village 1 ~` Filing. Applicant: Eugene Fahey, represented by Sally Brainerd, RKq, Inc. Planner: Allison Ochs ~. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow far one Type III and four Type IV Employee Housing Units, located at the Vail Athletic Club & Spa, 352 East Meadow ©rive!a part of Tract B, Vail Vi[lage First Fiiing. Applicant: Ron Byrne, d.b.a. VML, L.L.C., represented by Tam Braun Planner: George Ruther 5. A request for a conditional use permit, to relocate 1300' of low-lying bike path, informally known as the Katsos Property, located at Tract A, Vail Village 12th Fiiing. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs li ~li9NUFY.gIL ~ MEMBERS ABSENT ~. ~. Final review of the Town of Vail's revised parking generation analysis and proposed amendments to Chapter 12-10, Town Code. ., Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Brent Wilson 7. A request for a variance from Sections 12-fiH-6 and 12-14-6, Town of Vaii Code, to allow for the addition of gross residential floor area and balconies within required setbacks located at 303 Gore Creek Drive, Vaii Townhouse #2-C/Lot 2, Block 5, Vaii Village 1 s~ Filing. Applicant: Vicki Pearson, represented by Ran Diehl, Architect Planner: Ann Kjeruif TABLED-UNTIL APRIL 24, 2000 8. A request for a variance from Sections 12-6D-9 {Site Coverage}, 12-6D-8 (Density} and 12-6^-6 {Setbacks}, Tawn Code, to allow for a garage and residential addition, located at 2955 Bellflower DrivelLot 6, Block 6,Vail Intermountain. Applicant: Alan & Francine Peters Planner: AVlison Ochs TABLED UNTIL APRIL 24, 2000 9. A request far a conditional use permit to allow for a proposed expansion at Vail Mountain School, located at 3160 Katsos Ranch Road/Part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing. Applicant: Vaii Mountain School, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Architects Planner: Brent Wilson TABLED UNTIL APRIL 24, 2000 10. A request for a work session to discuss a proposed major amendment to Special Development District #4 (Cascade Village}, located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West (Glen Lyon C+ffice Building}/Lot 54, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Dundee Realty, represented by Segerberg Mayhew Architects Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL MAY 22, 2000 11. A PEC review of proposed modifications to the Gore Creek Flood Plain, located at the Gore Creek Whitewater Park, Gore Creek PromenadeCTracts I ~ A, Block 5B, Vail Village 1St Filing.. Applicant: Vail Valley Tourism and Convention Bureau Planner: Brent Wilson TABLED 12. Information Update Town Council joint worksession with the PEC on May 2"d, a# 1 p.m. in the Town Council Chambers. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss philosophy related to development review projects and haw to coordinate between the tvuo boards. 2 ©ne two-year term PEC vacancy - {Tom Weber}. PEC REP'RESENTATlVE AT DRB FOR 20Q0- Doug Cahill - Jan-Apr, 5, '00 Galen Aasland - Apr-Jun 'QO Diane Golden - Jul-Sep '00 Jahn Schofield - Oct-Dec `QQ 13. Approaal of March 27, 2Q(}0 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available #or public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Developmen# Department, 7~ South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 far information. Sign language interpretation available vpan request with 24 hour notification. Please Ball 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published ApNI 07, 2000 in tare Vail Trail • • PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ~~ • PUBLIC METE=TING SCHEDULE Monday, April i b, 2b00 MEETING F~ESULTS Project Orientation 1 PEC LUNCH -Community Develgament Department MEMBEi~S PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT John Schofield Diane Golden Galen Aasland Brian Doyon Cf~as Bernhardt Doug Cahill Site Visits 1. i{atsos Bike Path -Tract A, Vail Village 12"' 2. Fahey - 22~ Wall Street Drier: George ~o NoTE~ If the PEC nearing extends until 6:40 p.m., the baard will f7reak far dinner Pram 6:40 - 6:30 p.m. 11:30 a.m. 1:Ob p.m. Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:U0 p.m. 1. Swearing in of reappointed PEC member Galen Aasland -Lorelei Donaldson, Town Glerk. 2. Election cf 24bb Chair - vice-Chair - MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Doug Cahill VaTE: 4-b TABLED UNTIL MAY 24, 2Q00 3. A request far a canditie~nal use permit, to allow for the consolidation of two units within the Wall Street Building, located at 225 Walt StreeULat B, C, Black 5C, Vail Village 15t Filing. Applicant: Eugene l=ahoy, represented dy Sally Brainerd, I~KD, Inc. Planner: Allison Ochs MOTIQN: Doug Cahill SECC3ND: Chas Bernhardt VQTE: 4-(7 APPRQVED ~. ~~h'4FYAIL ~t I 4. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for one Type III grad four Type IV Employee Housing Units, located at the Vail Athletic Glub & Spa, 352 East Meadow Drivela part of Tract B, Vail Village 'First Filing. Applicant: Ron Byrne, d.b.a. VML, LL.C., represented by Tom Braun Planner: George Ruther MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Chas Bernhardt VOTE: 4-0 APPRC?VED WITH 2 COMDITIONS: 1. That the Developer executes and records employee housing deed-restrictions far each of the required employee units with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Tfae triggering mechanism far £he TCO would be construction of any of the AU's, FFU's, ar condos. 2. That the Developer indicates the precise location and final location of the storage lockers and washer and dryer on the plans submitted to the Town of Vail for a building permit. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. A request far a conditional use permit, to relocate 1300' of low-lying bike path, informally known as the Katsas Property, 6ocated at Tract A, Vail Village 12th 1^iiing. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs MOTION: Chas Bernhardt SECOND: Galen Aasland VOTE: 4-0 DENIEfl -With the finding that the PEC feels the environmental negative impact would outweigh the positive impacts, 6. Final review of the Town of Vail'5 revised parking generation analysis and proposed amendments to Chapter # 2-10, Town Cade. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Brent Wilson MOTION: Chas Bernhardt SECOND: Doug Cahill VOTE: 3-1 {Aasland opposed and requested that his support for approval of the proposal be forwarded to Gouncii. TABLED -With the finding that it be tabled until such time that the Comprehensive Day- Skier Parking Study is completed to review it altogether and that the PEG is in general agreement that this is a step in the right direction to encourage businesses in the core area. 7. A request for a variance from Sections 12-6H-G and 12-14-~6, Town of Vail Code, to allow for the addition of gross residential floor area and balconies within required setbacks, located at 303 Gore Greek Drive, Vail Townhouse #2-CILot 2, Block 5, Vail Village 1 sr Fling. Applicant: Vicki Pearson, represented by Ron Diehl Planner: Ann E<jeruif TABLED UNTIL APRIL 24, 2000 ~~"~.s t~. '~+,~' K~ Y r4 :~ ~4F'"' ' k'. S N, ~P~~h~1,1C~ a.k ~F}, a r.: A""k,w, r ~' ~ fi .'qdF Cllr b" ; h'~4ID r 8. A request for a variance from Sections 12-5D-9 {Site Coverage), 12-6D-i3 {Density} and 12-6D-6 (Setbacks), Town Code, to allow for a garage and residential addition, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6. Block 6,Vail Intermountain. Applicant: Alan & Francine Peters Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL APR[L 24, 2000 9. A request far a conditional use permit to allow far a proposed expansion at Vail Mountain School, located at 3160 Katsos Ranch RoadlPart of Lot 12, Block 2, Vai( Village 12`x' Filing. Applicant: Vail Mountain School, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Architects Planner: Brent Wilson TABLED UNTIL APRIL 24, 2000 ? 0. A request far a work session to discuss a proposed major amendment to Special Development District #4 (Cascade Village), located at 1000 S. 1=rantage 1=3oad West (Glen Lyon Office Building)/Lot 54, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Dundee Realty, represented by Segerberg Mayhew Architects Planner; George Ruther TAiBLED UNTIL MAY 22, 2000 ~J 11. A PEC review of proposed modifcations to the Gore Creek Flood Plain, located at the Gore Creek Whitewater Park, Gore Greek Promenade/Tracts I & A, Block 5B, Vail Village 1Si Filing. Applicant: Vail Valley Tourism and Convention Bureau Planner: Brent Wilson TABLED 12. Information Update ~ Town Council joint worksession with the PEG on May 2°d, at 1 p.m. in the Town Council Chambers. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss philosophy related to development review projects and how to coordinate between the two boards. One two-year term PEC vacancy - (Tom Weber). PEC REPRESENTATIVE AT DRB t~OR 2000- Doug Cahill - Jan-Apr. 5, '00 Ghas Bernhardt - Apr. 19, '00 Galen Aasland - Apr-Jun '00 Diane Golden - Jul-Sep '00 John Schofield - Oct-Dec `00 TABLED UNTIL APRIL 24, 2000 (until all members are present} • 13. Approval of March 27, 2000 minutes. J , qq~~ w! ~4:~ .' .r ,+.,, ~~ t .~ ~ ~ ~ ....- _ _ ,y. ws T" p.,.a ,:~ ' +YW:r ..~k~.: r.-c: The applications and information about the proposals are aVaiiable for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vaif Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. S'sgn language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. ?lease call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Qeparirnent Published Aprii 07, 2000 in the Vail Trail • ,~,,. xt - ~-. .a x'h`s~t^; r+A'~:s a ,rr _~.'~~~~ ''F .~..' p, ,~y, a ua IDs' .r t~.K.Ss~k L~3""L.~y; r.,., /,~ '~ ~. -~;o,Sr~F iWl' ~4 r.a '~~r. ~:n `~ ~'~`s `.~ri-'@t 7~s~~~ .'.~~..,p'~,.y~_ ~ ~.a~r~"~N'.d.~_, ., MEMORANDUM T'Q: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 10, 2flfl0 SUBJECT: A request for a condi#ional use permit; to allow for the consolidation of two units within the Wail Street Building; located at 225 Wall Stree#/Lot B, C, Block 5G, Vail Village 1s` Filing. Applicant: Eugene Fahey, represented by Sally Brainerd of RKD, Inc. Planner: Allison Ochs DESCRIPTION Ot= THE REQUEST The applicant, Eugene Fahey, represented by Sally Brainerd of RKD, Inc. is reques#ing a conditional use permit to allow for the elimina#ion of a dwelling unit located within fhe Wall Street Building, located at 225 Wall Streetil_o# B, C, Block 5C: Vail Village 1$` Filing. Units 3fl1 and 303 are adjacent to one another. Consolidation of the uni#s will be achieved by eliminating Unit 303's hallway access and removing interior walls to connect the units. Pursuant to Section 12-7B-5 (Permitted and conditional uses; above 2nd floor) of the Town Code: the following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the 2nd floor subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit: "Any permitted or conditional use which eliminates any existing dwelling or accommodation unit, or any portion thereof, sha11 require a conditional use permit." II. ROLES OF THE REVIEWING BOARDS Planning and Environmental Commission.' The Planning and Environmental Commission is respon5r'ple for evaluating this conditional use permit application for: 1, Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities; schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congas#ion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is #o be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title. ~` _ j ,, r~11VNOf VAIL 7. Conformance with development standards of zone district Design Review Board: The f~esigrr Review Board is responsible for evaluating the Design Review application for' IV. 1. Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings 2. Fitting buildings into landscape 3. Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography 4. RemovallPreservation of trees and native vege#atian ~. Adequate provision for snow storage on-site 6. Acceptability of buiiding materials and colors 7. Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms 8. Provision of landscape and drainage 9. Provision of fencing, wails, and accessary structures 1Q. Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distanc®s 11. Location and design of satellite dishes 12. Provision of outdoor lighting 13. The design of parks STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends apprawal of the applicant's request for a conditional use permit to allow far the consolidation of two dwelling units into one dwelling unit at the Wall Street Building. Staff's recommendation of approval is based upon our review of the criteria outlined in Section IV of this memorandum. Staff recommends approval of this request subject to the following findings: 1. That the proposed elimination of the dwelling unit is in accordance with the purpose section of the Commercial Core 1 Zone District. 2. That the proposed location of the dwelling unit to be eliminated will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity of the Wall Street Building. 3. That the proposed elimination of the dwelling unit complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Town Code. BACKGROUND In reviewing this conditions! use permit request, staff relied upon the goals, policies and objectives outlined in the various Town of Vail planning documents. The following is a summary of staff's review of the Town's planning documents: Town Code According to Section 12-7Q-1, the purpose of the Commercial Core 1 Zone District is as follows: The ^ommerciai Core 1 District is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and z other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The District regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and t7esign Considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and archi#ectural qualities that distinguish the Village. Vail Land Use Plan 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.3 The ruality ofi development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.4 The original theme of the old Village Core should be carried into new development in the Village Core through continued implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas ~infill areasj. 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in ne~n~ areas where high hazards do not exisf. 5.4 Residential growth should keep page with the market place derziands far a full range of housing Types. Vail VilPaae Master Plan Goal #1: Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. 1.2 ©biective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. V. CONDITIONAL USE PERIUIIT CONSIDERATION CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by the Town Code. The Fahey Residence is located within the Commercial Core 1 Zone District. The proposal is subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Title 12, Chapter 1~,. For the Planning and Environmental Commission's reference, the conditional use permi# purpose statement indicates that: In order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title; specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject. to the granting of a conditional use permit. Because ofi their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so that they may be located properly with respect #o the purposes of this title and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the conditional uses wild be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives. applications for conditional use ;permits shall be denied. A. Consideration of Factors 1. Relationship and impact of the use an development objectives of the Town. Staff believes the applicant's request to eliminate a dwelling unit. in the Wail Street Building will have minimal negative impacts on the development objectives of the Town_ The site is currently non-conforming with regards to density. The CC1 done District allows for 25 dwelling units per acre. Currently, the there are approximately 9 dwelling units an a .168 acre lot {or 53.57 units per acre). By reducing the number of dwelling units to 8, this proposal brings the entire site closer to conformity with density requirements {or 48 units per acse). However, staff believes that the proposal will reduce the effective occupancy rate of the two uni#s, which when compounded throughout the Town, could reduce the bed base of the Town_ 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facili#ies, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. • Staff believes the proposed elimination of the dwelling unit will have minimal negative impacts on the above-described criteria. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and harking areas. Staff believes the proposed elimination of the dwelling unit will have no negative impacts on the above-described criteria. 4. Effect upon the character cif the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. The exterior modification includes the addition of a deck and some minor window changes. These modifications will be reviewed by the Design Review Board to ensure compliance with the Vail Village Urban Design Considerations. Staff believes there will be no negative impacts on the above-described criteria. B, Findings • 4 The Planning and Pnvironmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit: ~. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and the purposes of the district. in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety;. or welfare or materially injurious to properties or iritprovements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Regulations. F:IEVE RYO N E,'~.P E C'J41EiV10laatFAFI EY • • ~~rravne aa~~ar ~ur~uu,r.acr~ ,. , r^~ ~~-~. ~1'.KL~', i+ear ~~ -w f~ ~ d -•~;..~......~ - s r ; ~' ~9 -~- -~...~ - E C, '~"~ `~... • ~. i._ v' n~F L~~..~Y ~ ,~r.. wl~~ FBI -1 JYJO'Jj7 ~~ ! ~.__ R~ 4 w 0 ~~°~~. ~ . ,, ~ ~ ; ~ i ~~ ~ ~- ,~ i a ~ i S z w I i :I i ~! ~i i! S ff~ 3 ~ ~ x~r~~ s ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ _ Y r ~ i~ ~~~~o~~ i ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ; ~ ~~ Fi ~ r {, 1 ,~~~~' ~ ~~5 WALL S7~EET ~~ ~ uNrrsaw ~-~ '` ^c. 4[7T: @, @it)C}L• 5C, FR].NL~: VA14 VIiLAC~ 1, ZC1NlNO! L7Ct ~ „^,.~;~~ 'ti. • • • ~~ ~tJd Q~i~ ~~9s9Lb0L6 S~:bL 00@~/901t~8 i -- _ ~; ` 1 ,.. ~ i I I Y ~ ' . O.. I ~ _.. _ ' ~ F 1 I ~ --_ ~ Q ~ e ~~m I r ~ ~ I i ! I .....---- ---, - - .~-~_- -~-- ~~ i Ill ~ ~~ _.....---.._...---------_ 1T' Ir. ~_ ~~------rr ' ---~-- ~ i ~ I ~' _ ,. ;~i ~ ~ I~ I ~~ i ~~~ W ' il! - I11 ~ i ' I ` ! ' ' 1 li ~ 9 . ;,i, ~ ~ :~~~ __. __ ' l -; .~a:~ J I ~~ Qe 1 ex y c,a - II _ ~. w ~ I I ~ ...--- • I , i~i ~ _. ~ ~ 2~5~ 1NALL STREET ~: ~ , ~~,~ S f ~bY: B. atACl{: 3C, FIlINO. VA{L Vi1LJ1CiE 1. ZGMING. CCI 1 ::, . " MC . £~ 39ad ~~ EZ06'~Lb0L6 5~ ~ti~ ®[3QZf90/CG3 ~. p~ ~p~ 7S C ~, S4 ~, r t ,t;l~~ ~' ~ 4 fyr ~ii . I ,,~ ^~. ^ i'~` !!!' II ~'I~ i I I~ ~ ,j~j.l ~;li: ~l I;jie~ I t , ~ .I j ~I ~~ . '9 ~ I {k.. ~ 4~ II # ~ ~ i l ,~,I ~, . i ~~ L~j ~. f j., ;~~ '~ „~I,I I ;, :i ~ r .~,.; 4 , l l 1 ; f ~I.~I~ ~Ite 1.1 ~~ - 225 WALL STREE'T' ~` IJwlrs aot a ~ LqT: 93. Ei~c~c:x: 4[;~ FlllN~i_ VAIL YIi.LACiB 7. ZQNINK7: CC b~ 3~d tDi~f t ~~ E~069Lb0Lb ~Z~bt ®0~L1901be • f 6 ~.e...,_ __ ._ .__--___-_-- 3 1~, 9 ~a ~ , I I ~ aP. ,, ~ ~ ,. ~ 1 1~ 1 ~ ti l ~I ~ f i t y. 4 ~ ~ i ,, ', -R" i ,y '~~ ; ~ ~, I ~~~ ~I I ~,:,, I , ~y% i, y v `~ ~~ i ~ 1 - --~~. __ .._ ...r._.- ~ ~ ~~ , .. _~.__ .. ~ - ..__ -~ ~ : ~~. I r! ~gf d~ `~~ Q `, ~ V - .... I r i i ,1 t.~- - - i - i - --~-, ~' y ~ ` ~ _.~ ~~ ~ ry~-~ ~ ~~ .~~ d '~ ~ .. t~ l~.. ~ .~I ~g f ~ ~~ ~ ~ .y z'~ ~ `~ ~~ ~ 1 1- _ ~.. ~ ~'V 'd #. ~ __... - - S ~ t_IJ C~ ,: ~ ~ ~; Q F Y~ i t ~ i-`1 [~,~ ~ ~ ~ jf~ ~C"i y ! t ` 1 ~ l ~~~. ;y ,`~. 1~ ~- { - 't I ~ .. ~_~~.. _._--. .._~ Y ~i 0 '] IL 1 y i ~ YI~S r ~ '~ : ~ ~ iy _..y _: i ~ I ,. ; ~ # 't ,' ~,~' . _--__„_ ~_~-~-- f -~~ _, r~ -- `~ 'f SET . ~ 225 ~~~-~' S Ur+~ts ,n+ sE r _ zsxn~: rc+ ~~ ~~ :tip Baez 9 _ _~ ~ 1 y ~~ ~ ~ `' ~: w Ii, +,, ,;: ~~~. ; l'` ~i ; ~ . ,. .;~ i~ i ~ B '~I: ~i ~, ;~° ! ~ ~ '~ ;~I ~ !I~ }} .~~ ~ I 1 ~'I; . i J ~,~, ~I ~ ~ l -i i 1 I i ~~ ,. ' ~ i; ~~ i ., ~~ -. .. i,~ ~ , ~~.: I. ~: 'I. ~ ,~ s 19~ II4 1 ~~ ~i~ ~' ~i ih `~ ,1 ;_~ ~~i~: ,~~ ~~~~ ~I~~' ~ ~i~!.!. ~+~i~~ I,k -1 t t~,,;! ~ 22~ WALL STEtEET i;~ - ~~. wwra ao~ a ~+ ~ i .; ~ ~ ' ~ t07: ~ SLOCi(_ bC, FlI..IM(i: VI1lL YIf.I.IrC3lS S. Z'WJil~Q: CCU _ 99 39k~d Q?li~ EZ~69Lb0LE+ 5Z : fr L 0092 /50 Cb~ • • ~~ ~ i ~ii~l~~~~ j '~.~ a ~~, ~a 1 _ .......:.-i. ~ u.--hn ' jJ~ ~~ ~. ~' 1 1 t 1~ ~ . 225 W,p~LL STREET LOT: 9, S1ACK: dom. FiL1Mp: YAfL Y1LIJu0E i, IONtNQ: CC1 R~ ~, E~C~Fi'~L#~0L6 5~:bti H00~Ig~1~0 :~ ,~ a X r F c C r G } C~_ Y Z G1 • ~ a~~111d~ ~I i.i i~`I' 80 3~t%d 225 WALL STREET wise sot +- aoa LAT: 9, s~ rarv: ~. F{LINC3: Y/41L I/iLL/1L~E 1, Z~ONINC~: CC1 1 Q?f~l ~ ~, ~ :,,~, c ~~• ' EZ~69Lb9L6 SZ=~~ 80~Zf90fbe MEMORANDUM T0: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 10, 2000 SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of Type III and Type IV employee housing units as part of the redevelopment of the Vail Athletic Club & Spa, located at 352 East Meadow DriveOa part of Tract B, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Ron Byrne, d.b.a. VML, L.L.C., represented by Tom Braun Planner: George Ruther I. DESCRIPTIQN 41` THE REQUEST The applicant, Ron Byrne, represented by Tom Braun, is requesting a conditional use permit to allow for the construction four Type IV and one Type III employee housing units as part of the redevelopment of the Vail Athletic Club & Spa. The Vail Athletic Club & Spa is located at 352 East Meadow Drive at the intersection of East Meadow Drive and Vail Valley Drive. The applicant is proposing to provide on-site, deed-restricted employee housing for six Vail Athletic Club 8~ Spa employees. To do so, the appfcant is proposing to construct four, one bedroom Type N and one: two-bedroom Type III employee housing units. The five units will be located on the lower level of the hotel and will total approximately 1,610 square feet in size. The Type lV employee units will average approximately 285 square feet in size and are designed to meet the minimum requirement for Type IV units as prescribed in Section i 2-13-7 of the Zoninc Regulations. This includes the provision of at least 1.50 cubic feet of storage space per unit and not less than one washer and dryer for the five units. The one Type III unit is approximately 466 square feet in size. The two bedroom unit has been designed to meet the minimum requirements for Type lil units as outlined in Section 12-13-6 of the Zoning Regulations Each of the employee housing units will be deed-restricted in accordance with the Town of Vail employee housing requirements. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATIQN The Community Development Department recommends approval of the applicant's request for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of four Type IV and one Type Ill employee housing units as part of the redevelopment of the Vail Athletic CEub & Spa, located at 352 East Meadow Drive. Staff's recommendation of approval is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Sections IV of this memorandum. Should the Planning & Environmental Commission choose to approve the conditional use permit request, staff would recommend that the Commission male the foNowing findings, ~~~' `lt 7~}YN 4F YA1'L `That the conditional use permit request complies with the criteria as ©utlined in Section 1V of this memorandum. The proposed employee housing units further the development objectives ref the Town of Vail and will trot be detrimental to existing or potential uses, nor will they nave any adverse effects upon the distribution of light, air, traffr'c or population " Should the Planning & Environmental Commission choose to approve the applicant's request, staff would recommend that the following conditions be made part of the approval: 1. That the Developer executes and records employee housing deed-restrictions far eacl ~ of the required employee units with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Offjce prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. 2. That the Developer indicates the precise location and final location of the storage lockers and washer and dryer on the plans submitted to the Town of Vail for a building permit.. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. lll. BACKGROUND On March 13, 200x, the Town of Vaii Planning & 14nvironmental Commission approved a major exterior alteration and conditional use permit to allow far the redevelopment of the Vail Athletid, Club & Spa. The Commission's approval required that the developer provide deed-restricted employee housing for a minimum of six employees in a minimum of five employee housing unit:,. These requirements were generated as a result of an employee generation analysis completed for the redevelopment proposal. !W. CRITERIA ANn F1NnINC~ FnR A CONDITIONAL. USE PI=KNIT Upon review of Chapter 10 of the Zoning Regulations, the Community Development DepartmE>nt recommends approval of the request for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of five employee housing units at the Vail Athletic Club & Spa based upon the following factors: A. Gansideration of Factors: Be#ore acting on a conditional use permit application, the Planning and Environmental Commission (P1=C} shall consider the factors with respect to the proposed use: Relationship and impact of the use om ttevelopm~nt objectives of tYie Town. The provision of deed-restricted employee housing has been a long- standing goal of the Town of Vail. To insure that the private sector participates in providing the much needed employee housing, the Vail Town Council recently adopted legislation requiring developers to mitigate not only the impacts of development on the Town's infrastructure, bu also to mitigate the impacts of development on employee housing. Overall, staff believes the developer will be mitigating the employee housing impacts created by the hotel redevelopment and that this request fully complies with the above-described criteria. 2 2. The effect of the use on light and air,. distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. Staff believes that this request will not have any negative effects upon the above-described criteria. In fact, staff believes the applicant's request wil, improve the distribution of the population in the Town of Vail. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, autorrtoti~r'e and, pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the s7reet and l.~ark'rng areas. Staff believes that the request will not negatively impact the above- described criteria. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposers use in relation to surrounding uses. The Public Accommodation zone district allows for residential uses. The existing uses in the immediate vicinity of the Vail Athletic Club & Spa are residential in nature (Mountain Haus, Cornice Building, Varlafuer). Staff believes the residential nature of the employee housing units are compatible with the existing surrounding and potential uses and will no be r~etrimental to the character of the area. • 3 • MEMC}R~#NDUM TO: Planning and Environments! Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 14, 2040 SUBJECT: A request for a conditions! use permit, to relocate 1340' of low-lying bike path, informally Known as the Katsos Property, located at Tract A, Vai! Village 12`" Filing. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Gregg Barrie Planner: Allison C3chs • !, li3ACl~{GROt1Nt7 AND DESCRlPTlON OF THE REC1lJEST The Town of Vai! is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to a{low for the relocation of 1340 ft. of low lying bike path !stated at the property informally known as the Katsos property !Tract A, Vail Village 12"' Filing, A map has been attached foe reference. The property is currently zoned Natura! Area Preservation District, which requires a Conditional Use Permit for "paved and unpaved, non-motorized, bicycle paths and pedestrian walkways." The purpose of the Natural Area Preservation District is: The Natural Area Preservation District is designed to provide areas which, because of their environmentally sensitive nature ar natural beauty, shall be protected from encroachment by any building or other improvement; other than those listed in Section 12-$C-2 of this Article. The N2rtura{ Area Preservation District is intended to ensure that designated lands remain in their natural state, including reclaimed areas, by protecting such areas from development and preserving open space. The Natural Area Preservation District includes lands having valuable wildlife habitat, exceptional aesthetic or flood control value, wetlands, riparian areas and areas with significant environmental constraints. Protecting sensitive natura! areas is important for maintaining water quality and aquatic habitat, preserving wildlife habitat, flood control, protecting view corridors, minimizing the risk from hazard areas, and protecting the natural character of Vail which is so vital to the Town's tourist economy. The intent shat! not preclude improvement of the natural environment by the removal of noxious weeds, deadfall where necessary to protect public safety or similar compatib{e improvements. The Town of Vai! is proposing the relocation of the bike path due to the flooding that typically occurs on this portion of the path during the spring. The existing path is located in the 140-year Flood Plain. The proposed path is located at a higher grade, and out of the 100-year Flood Plain, except where the proposed path meets existing. The Town of ,, ~~~, ~. ~'0'~~4 ~F !'AIL ~` Vaii has been working with the Army Carps of Engineers an this project (see conditions of approval below.} The existing path will be removed and the area will be reclaimed. The attached plan shows the proposed relocation of the bike path. larior to the 196fl's this property„ informally known as the Katsas property, located at Tract A, Vaii Village 12`x, had been used far sheep grazing. !n the early 1960's, it was purchased by Vail Associates, who planned to develop the property as housing. However, steep slopes and multiple geologic hazards precluded extensive development. In July of 1977, the Town of Vail purchased the property. !n the fate 197fl's, the Town of Vail rezoned the property from Low Density Multiple t=amity to Greenbelt and Naturaf open Space listrict, with a proposal to complete the bike path, which was already partially constructed on the western partian of the property. At that time, a Canditianal Use Permit was not required for paved. In 1996, the land was rezoned to Natural Area Preservation District, which requires a conditional use permit far paved recreation paths. II. ROLES OE THE REVIEV'Ull~f{a BOARDS Planrrina arrd ~'rrvr'ranmentai Commission: The Planning and Fnvironr~aental Gommission rs respar7sible far evaiuatit7g this conditional use permit application far: 1. Relatiarship and impact of the use an development objectives of the Town. 2. Effect of the use on fight and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schaals, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion,. automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. ~. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report rs required by Chapter 12 of this Title. 7. Conformance with development standards of zone district Design review Board: The Design Review Board is responsible for evaluating the Design Review a~oplicatian for: i. Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings 2. Fitting buildings into landscape 3. Configuration of building and grading of a site whioh respects the topography 4. RemovallPreservation of trees and native vegetation 5. Adequate provision for snow storage on-site 6. Acceptability of building materials and colors 7. Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other Building farms 8. Provision of landscape and drainage 9. Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory s#ructures 1 fl. Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances 11. Location and design of satellite dishes 12. Provision of outdoor lighting 13. The design of parks ill. STAFF RECO~IAMENDATION The Camrnunity Development ^epartment recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the relocation of the bike path, subject to the following tindings: t. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning Cade and the purposes of the Natural Area Preservation Zone District. ?. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental tv the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code, Should the Planning and Environmental Cammrssivn choose to approve the conditional use permit for the relocation of the bike path, staff recommends the following condition: Prior to construction, a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers must be submitted tv the Community ®evelopment Department. IV. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR THE CONDITIONAL USE PERWIiT The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by the Town of Vail Code. The bike path is located within the Natural Area Preservation Zone District. The proposal is subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Title i2, Chapter 16. Fvr the Planning and Environmental Commission's reference, the conditivnai use permit purpose statement indicates that. In order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so that they may be faceted properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with. respect to their effects an surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at large. Uses Fisted as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject fa such conditions and limitations as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the conditional uses wilt be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives, applieatians for conditional use permits shah be denied, A. Consideration of Factors: 1. Flelatianship and impact of the use an the development objectives of the Town. Staff believes that the proposal follows the development objectives of the Town of Vail, as these objectives are stated in the Land Use Plan: 1. i .1. Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial, and recreations! uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1. t .2. The quality of the environment including air, water, and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. i .t .3. The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 2.7 The Town of Vail should improve the existing park and open space lands while continuing to purchase open space. In addition, Staff believes that the proposal follows the development objectives of the Town of Vail, as "improving the pedestrian and bike system" was identified as a priority in the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. Because the existing path is located within the floodplain, there will be activity within the floodplain when the existing path is removed. The proposed path is not located within the floodpiain, except at the point where the proposed path joins the existing path (see attached map). 2. The effect of the use an light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and o#her }public facilities needs. The relocation of the bike path will improve the circulation of the entire bike path throughout the spring when this section is typically flooded. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to conges#ian, automo#ive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. The relocation of the bike path will improve pedestrian safety and convenience. Staff believes there will be na effect on the other abc~ve- mentioned criteria. 4. Effec# upon the character gf the area in which the proposed use is to be locoted, including the scale and bulls of the proposed use in relation t© surroc~ding uses. 4 Staff believes there will be no effect an the above-mentioned criteria. B. Firidirtgs The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the foliawing findings before granting a conditional use permit: 1. That the proposed Eocation of the use is in accord with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district in which the site is lacated_ 2. Shat the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public healthi safety, ar welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. • • Katsos Bike Path Relocati Conditional Use Permit Bike Path Relocati©n Property Proposed: to relocate '! 30o ft. of lows-~yin~ bide path which is • • i4 ~x - 1 . ,, 9 ~, {~ I ~~~ ~~ ~~~.. ~ 1 ~; ~ ~-' ~4 i ei { ~ ~ i _ ... ~ I~ _ ~nr: T ~ I ~ - ~ ~. T - - `r,1r bC - _ _. _.~~'J -_ A I __ a I .- i z _ ~ 11 M 4 1 ~~ . - 1 + G ~_-:; , 4 of i ` ~ ' ,` ~~ ~.~,~ =i _ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~1 ~ E ~~ i~ ` ~ 1 i a ~kVl ~ __--_.-- Y ~1 w ~1 L7 , 0 I ~ ~ ~- 1 r~ ~~ ~~ ~ . ~ ~~ P:, ,~..,,~ ~: ~~~ ~ '~>, .~ ~~' ~~~. o ~~ ,~ `1 ~ g ~; ,, ~ ~ . 1` ~~~ i' ~ ~ ,,,~ " /1 i l 7I ~ ~ ~ 11jy 1i~' 'r .~ ! ` i?~~ ~1 N , Y K~ ~~~'t/ ,~~~ ~ ~ ~ 3;~, ,' ~ ~,' ~ ))~ ~~/ -'w 1-' ~j 1 \ ~- IJ RkyF 7 .• ~, `j~ ~~,, (~~ ~i y- ~ ~~~ - ~ ~ `~ `~~'~ ^~ ~ ,I ;~ ~,.~ , ~~~ ,\~ -~ ,ISS '~.:;`~' ~ ~~~\~ Ali ,, ~1 ,~W ~ `'~ - ~ ~ ~`~ ~f I 3 ,, °' _ ~ i 1 -°S w~- h ,x ~ ~ ~F ~,i l,' ~ ~'; ~~ ~ 1~ ~ ~~~ - ~~i r f t I Ij r--~-, ~, ~~ , .~. , ~, ~ ~. /~. / ~ ~IAlL BIKE TRAJL RELQCATtpN MAJ~J.;IN ~NGJNEERINC ~~ APPRO% TRAIL STA J30~D0 TC 4',3t0^ - .. - .. :+z~ - ~~;- -__ PROJECT- S-A t]+OCJ T{3 5+4D Tnwu CaF uAIL. COLORADO - ~.,~~ gat ~ ! ~~ ~~ ref f ~< < ~~ ~~ - - -----__. ~~1 ~ !t h s ti-- I ; ~ It ~ ~ ~~--. 1 :py~ ~ ~tt I~~~ ~~ ~4 ~4~ Y e- _ _. `°- - t 1~ llhl~ ~,1 ~ '~ `~~ ~ .. C •~ 111 1 M - 1 r , `` e r. 1 -.t~_ ~ ~ ~lV +n v t , ~ C - ~ ~ _ ~ ~f ` 1$ 's ~ .~ I - ~+~', A ~~ ._ I I ~ 'f~7 :~ ~ ~~- r, ~ ~ / r~ __._I. o~ .n r '' /~ .I-~.` ,-~ gT ~~ ,,~ ., , ; f ( r D ! ~ IY~1 tl~ r F~: - ~~ ~~, ~ Iv ~ r~ 111 1 Y ~~ ~ '~ - ~1~~~~ ~ j, ; f ~ I r~ ~' - ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~I~JJ~+ ~° ~ ~II~I `~~ fir' . ij I it ' !j9 if ,!! .~..' y _ _ ~ ~~ ~ :~,~ ~~. - ~ / ~~ 1~ i~ ~~ /F .~ ----- , ~ -- g ' I I ~R ~~ ,1 ~/ r ~•-~-- i '~~ u ~.i! ~~ ~ ~ 1 a Pi~r ~~ ~I 1 Y.., A~ 1-1 ~ ~ ?oa 5~. x f ~~ ~ - _ r - .. I~ °~, ~ ~" ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ - ~ VAIL BIKE TRAlL RELOCA71pN MAp CIN ENOlNEE3tING LLC ~_ _ ARRPOX TRAI4 STA CQ-f00 TP g".j+00 _ ~~}r PRfSJEC7 STA 8+00 TO 7O~l,1'G_7'S - _~ ~ ._ ~ _;: ~ - TtSVNV O'fir VAIL, COLORADO : _ _ - _ _ - f~rr ~ j t ~~ , i ~. ,t _. ~, 1 j- c', t ,~ [ f c ~.~ .; .. ~ ~,- 1, ,p~,. ~~- ~~ ~,~`17 t a~j 1'1~~ ~ t:~ t~ r~, :-~.. - --- ~ ti ,~ ~~ i _ ~~;' 11 , i ~ ', p T y1' 1 S f' ~~ ~ r~ ~~r~ ~~ \ ~ ttl~a.J w ~ } ~ j _ , .. ,~~~ , ~~~ r~ > ~ ~ •.4 t .- ~ ' r r4 - ^~ /~ ~ f ,fit' . ~ I / - of _ i s/ } ~ if : ` •. .. ! ` /` ~~ ~ > ! 1 f° '' _ r 'f zf = r ! r ' ' - sr f l" `1 f /`~ 1 ,. -f ' .... `' ] '~~ r , / f `f' t ~,f ,~ ~ `,~ ~ f• ',/f .rill I ~ ~ J~~f ~ f='(`~ }~1--` ~` ~ f x~, ~,~ ~f f r~,Y j r f `r ~ / ~ ~' ~ j, /~, ~ rf t'~ f J, f ~•` ~•' / .1 ~ f'yj :r~ r~+ f, ~~ ~i /~/ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ /,fe ~ ~'/r,,'f! j~ / / I f 1 /.~ t ,'` /, ~ I j~ 1 r! r i r1 ~ ~ rI~', 1 ~ j~ ! j ! r r I.~~ '~f , ' ~ s,~' ,.,< i /' j i ~I '/ I !t ~l t r 1 ] r JJ n / i f o` ~ ~t r r~ r ~ 1 ~ ! ! _~- J I , /j ~ ~ ~ 1 t~ f f ~~ ,~ 1 f _~ MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community aevelopcnent DATE: April ~ 0, 20QQ SUBJECT: A request for a final review of the Town of hail`s Gore Area Parking Analysis and proposed amendments to Chapter fit-11J, Town of Vail Code. Planner; Brent W ikon Applicant: Town of Vail I. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTI{3N 01= THE REQUEST PEG Update; On March 27J'~, the PEG conceptually reviewed the proposed amendments to the Town's parking regulations and directed staff to pursue the following changes to the parking requirements schedule: ^ A change in restaurant parking calculation from unumber of seats" to "seating hoar area.' This way, restaurants would not be discouraged from providing large waiting or lobby areas. Staff believes the amount of kitchen area and staff a restaurant contains/employs is commensurate with the size of its seating area. Therefore; we believe "seating floor area" to be a simple, effective technique for calculating restaurant parking. Additionally, staff is recommending a "minimum parking space" requirement to cover restaurants that may not have any seating floor area (i.e. Taco Bell Express). The recommended parking requirement for restaurants has been amended to reflect the PEC's requests. ^ A change in meeting roomfcanference space parking from "number of seats" to "seating floor area." The parking requirement has not changed since the last PEC meeting, but the method of calculation has been changed to "seating floor area" to remain consistent with the other uses identified in the Off-Street Parking and Loading code. ^ The PEC directed staff to pursue increasing the parking requirement for residential condominiums within the core areas. f'EC proposed maintaining a parking requirement of 2 spaces/unit for each condo. This is our current parking requirement for units between 50a-1,99 square feet. This represents a 30°Ia increase over the consultant's recommendation far units within the commercial cores. >~ ~ti TdWN (1F ti'A~IL Pagc 1 of 5 11WAIL117ATAIEW J=R'YC7[~iE11?EC~•iwIEGiC7$1p01Plti'~CxQE`r3.J]{)C: History of the orooosal During the summer of t g99, the -own hired the firm of l=elsburg, Holt & Ullevig to conduct an in-depth analysis of parking generation in Vail's commercial core areas. The primary purpose of the study was to determine the influence of external factors {mixed uses, `ransitlpedestrian trips, hourly variations in business activity} on parking generation. Currently, the Town's parking regulations do not account for these factors and assess parking requirements strictly by land use type and square footage. Given the inability of many properties in Vail Village and Lionshead to provide on-site parking and the Town's X17,917 per space parking pay-in-lieu fee, staff realized a need to produce a more realistic assessment of parking generation in these areas. Uver the past few months, the consultant examined data involving a number of factors influencing parking generation in Vail. Skier visits, parking suucture transactions, land use~~ per square foot, parking turnover ratios (length of stay}, and traffic(automobile, transit and pedestrian} counts were referenced and incorporated into a model This model was used to determine a more accurate assessment of parking generation in the Town's commercial core areas. The consultant`s recommendations are outlined in Section IV of this memorar;dum. It is importa,it to note these recommendations are applicable only to those properties that exhibit the characteristics outlined above (mixed uses, transit pedestrian trips, hourly variations in business activity}. Many areas of Vail (outside Vail Village and Lionshead) do not exhibit these characteristics and it would be inappropriate to apply these same rates at other locations. A copy of the consultant's study and findings has been. included in your packet for reference. !I. RQLI~S OF THE REVIEWING 80ARDS Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The PEG is advisory tQ the Town Council. The PEC shall review the proposal for and make a recommendation to the Town Council on the compatibility of the proposed text changes for consistency with the Vai] Comprehensive Plans and impact on the general welfare of the community. Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal. requirements are provided, The staff advises the applicant as to compliance with the Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. Staff provides analyses and recommendations to the PEC and Town Council on any text proposal. Town Council: Acfior~: The Town Council is responsibPe for fi»al approval/dertia! fln caa'e amendments. The Town Council shall review and approve the proposal based on the compatibility of the proposed text changes for consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Puns and impact on the general welfare of the community. rage z ~ e s F:1E V ERYflN ~'~,~EC'~."vl Eri~iOS'~Q01f'RKG G rN3.DOC Desian Review Board:. Ac#lon; The QRB has N4 revieu~r authorify art cede amendrrtent`s. III. STAFF RECOIVIMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning and Environmental Commission recommend approval of the proposed code amendmen#s to the Vaii Town Council, pursuant to the foliawing findings: 1. That the proposed code amendments further the development objectives of the Town of Vail. 2. That the proposed amendments are in keeping with the purpose and intent of the Vail Land Use Plan and all other applicable master planning documents. 3. That the health, safety, welfare and interests of the community are being met by the adoption and implementation of the proposed code amendments. IV. FINDINGS The fallowing table is a summary of the consultant's and the PEC's recommended parking rates for specific uses within the Town's commercial core areas. A comparison between the Town's current rates and the consultant's recommended rates is listed and reductions/additions to parking ratios are listed where applicable. Table 7.9 -Gurrent and Suggested Parking Rates (Gommerciaf Core Areas Only] Land Use Residential* Hotel** Conference Facility General Retail;** ©ffice**"` f Restaurant BanklFinance**" Gurrent Requirement 2.0+ spaceslunit 1.0 spaceslunit 1 space 1 ~ seats 3.33 spaces /KSF _ 4 spaces 1 KSF 1 space 1 8 seats 5 spaces 1 KSF Consultant's Suggested Requirement 1.4 spaceslunit d.7 spaceslunit 1 space / 11 seats - - -2.3 spaces /KSF 2.7 spaces 1 KSF .... _._ 1 space ! 12 seats 3.7 spaces !KSF PEC's Suggested Requirement 2.0 spaceslunit 0.7 spaceslunit 1 space ! 165 sq. ft. seating floor area 2 spaces 1 KSF 4 spaces /KSF 1 space 1250 sq. ft. seating Hoar area; min_ of 2 spaces**'"'" 3.7 spaces ! KS F * Resumes an average unit size of 500-1,999 square feet. Currently includes timeshares and FFU°s. ** Assumes an accrmmc~dation unit size of at least 600 square feet. Current requirement is 0.4 spaces/unit, plus 0.9 spaceJeach 900 square feef of GRFA, with a max.of 9.0 space/unit. Far parking purposes, timeshares/FFL!'s will be eortsidered as AU's. *** Involves a change in calculation from "net floor area" fo "gross floor area." ***" Involves a cfaange from space/number of seats to space/seating floor area "KSF" =9',000 square feet Page 3 of 5 F:~,EVFRYONE'.PFC'i41 E.L7US',(}01FRKGGS_ V3.LX)C For Example Por a paint of reference, a recently constructed project (the Vail Village Club j is shown based gn existing and the consultant's proposed parking schedule applicability. Reauired Parking for 1997 Vail Village Club Proposal Retail = x,594 sq. ft. - 11.98 parking spaces Office = 94 sq. ft. = 0.38 parking spaces RestaurantlClub = 5,717 sq. ft. (381 seats} = 47.64 parking spaces Total - 60.00 parking spaces -27 {grandfathered s~aaces~'` Grand Total - 33.00 narking spaces oav-in-lieu Hvpgtheticai Reauired Parking for Vail Villaa_ e Club Under Consultant's Prnoosed Parking Standards Detail = 3,594 sq, ft. - 8.26 parking spaces Office = 94 sq. ft. = 0.25 parking spaces iRestaurant/Club = 5,717 sq. ft. (381 seats) = 31.75 parkinca spaces Total - 40.26 parking spaces -27 fgrandfajtlered spacesl* Grand Total = 13.26 narking spaces nav-in-lieu This represents a difference of 19.74 pay-in-lieu spaces or $353,fi80,79 (based an current pay- in-lieu rates}. Earkirog Awaiiability Tahle 2.2 -Parking Availability by Lacatian ILacatianlType # of Percent of Tfltal Spaces _ Private Lionshead Spaces 995 21®/a Public Lionshead Spaces 1,300 28°ffl Private Vaii Village Spaces 1228 26% ~ ~Pubiic Vail Village Spaces 1200 25% ~ Total Available Spaces 4,723 1Q0°Io About 4'°0 of the available parking in Vail Village and Lionshead is supplied privately. The vast majority of these privately-held spaces are ~!evoted to residential uses. Page 4 ~f 5 1=:'iEV ERYOt~E',FEC'~,ME~td5`,(}OIFRKGGE?~f3.DOC ~!. DISCUSSION ITEMS C)verall, the consultant's recamrnended parking rates represent a 31°lo reduction in the amount of required parking for private uses in Vail Village and Lionshead compared to our current regulations. Table 3.1 ^ Current versus Proposed Parking Requirements Land Use Quantity Current Requirement OResidenfial Units 2,148 units 3,222 Retail 151,475 sf 504 Restaurant 82,127 sf 257 ©ffice 45,000 sf 180 ~ank ~ ..- 2,460 sf - --- --- -- - -.-- --- Y12 Total Required 4,175 Spaces Recommended Requirement 2,235 351 180 125 9 2,900 As depicted in Table 2.2, there are about 4,723 total. parking spaces in Vail Village and Lionshead. It is important to note, however, that a large percentage of these spaces (47°Jo}are privately-held and devoted primarily to private residential uses. There are only about 2,500 public parking spaces in the core areas to serve day skiers and their associated trips -with another 250 spaces outside the core areas at Ford Park. Any vacant private parking spaces are assumed to be unavailable for public day skier parking. • Pagc ~ of 5 P:',L4't=k~YE)T~Ji='~,PEC"uYllty€OS1t)01T'RKGC; Zi*13.11i )C: APPENQIX t`A„ CHAPTER 1 a O1=F-STREET PARKING AND LOADING SECTIQN: Added feat rs shown in bolt! and underlined type= deEefed fexf is shown in i~~ l~r,~- type 12-10-1: Purpose 14-70-2: Applicability 12-10-3. Existing Facilities 12-10-4; Additions Or Changes 12-10-5: Construction And Maintenance 12-10-6: Parking; Off Site And Joint Facilities 12-10-7: Standards; Authority To Adjust 12-10-8: Parking Standards 12-10-9: Loading Standards 12-10-10: Parking Requirements Schedule 12-10-11: Parking Schedule Applicability 12-10-12: Credit For Multiple Use Parking Facilities 12-10-13: Loading Requirements Schedule 12-10-14: Loading Schedule Applicability 12-10-15; Credit For Multiple-Use Loading Facilities 12-10-16: Exempt Areas; Parking Fund Established 12-10-17: Leasing Of Parking Spaces 12-10-18: Variances 12-10-1: PURPOSE: In order to alleviate progressively or to prevent traffic congestion and shortage of on-street parking areas, off-street parking and loading facilities shall be provided incidental to new structures, enlargements of existing structures or a conversion to a new use which requires additions! parking under this Chapter. The number of parking spaces and loading berths prescribed in this Chapter shall be in proportion to the need for such facilities created by the • particular type of use, Off-street parking and loading areas are to be designed, maintained and operated in a manner that will ensure their usefulness, protect the public safety, and, where appropriate, insulate surrounding land uses from their impact. In cerkain districts, all or a portion of the parking .spaces prescribed by this Chapter are required to be within the main building in order to avoid or to minimize the adverse visual impact of large concentrations ar exposed parking and of separate garage or carport structures. (Ord. 26(1982) ~ 1: Ord. 19(1976) ; 12: Ord. 8(1973} § 14.100). 12-10-2: APPLICABILITY: Off-street parking and loading space shalC be provided far any new building, for any addition or enlargement of an existing building or for any conversion of uses which requires additional parking under this Chapter. (Ord. 26(1982) § 2: Ord. 19(1976} ~ 12: Ord. 8(1973) ~ 14.200). 12-10-3: EXISTING FACILITIES: Off-street parking and Igading facilities used far off-strcct parking and loading on the effective date hereof shall not be reduced in capacity to less than the number of spaces prescribed in this Chapter, or reduced in area or number to less than the minimum standards prescribed in this Chapter. (Ord. 26(1982} § 3: Ord. 19(1976) § 12: Ord. 8(1973} ~ 14.201 }. 12-10-4: ADDITIONS OiR CIiANGES: Fqr additions or enlargemen#s of any existing building or change of use that would increase the total number of parking spaces required, the additional ;Narking shall be required only far such addition, enlargement or change and not far the entire building or use. (Ord. 19(1976) § 12: Ord. 8(1973} ~ 14.202) 12-10-5: Ct]NSTRUCTION AND IIAAINTENANCE: All aff-street parking and loading facilities required by this Chapter steal! be constructed and maintained in accordance with the minimum standards for such facilities prescribed by this Chapter, and shall be maintained free of accumulated snow or other materials preventing foil use and occupancy of the facilities in accordance with the intent of this Chapter, except for temporary periods of short Duration in event of heavy or unusual snowfall. (C7rd. 8{1973) ~ 14.300) 12-10-5: PARKING; OFF-SITE AND JOINT FACIL_1TiES; A11 parking and loading facilities repaired by this Chapter shat! be located on the same site as the use or which they are required, provided that the Town Council may permit. off-site or jointly used parking facilities if located within three hundred feet (300'} of the use served. Authority to permit Qff-site ar;oint parking facilities shall not extend to parking spaces required by this Title to be 9ocated within the mair-~ building on a site, but may extend to parking spaces permitted to be unenclased. Prior to permitting off-site orjoint parking facilities, the Council shall determine that the proposed location of the parking facilities and the prospective operation and maintenance of the facilities will fulfill the purposes of this Chapter, will be as useable and convenient as parking facilities located ;.n the site of the use, and will not cause traffic congestion or an unsightly concentration of parked cars. The Council may re~:~uire such legal instruments as it deems necessary to ensure unified operation and control of joint parking faciii#ies or to ensure the continuation of such facilities, including evidence of ownership, sang-term lease, or easement. (ord. 8(1973} ~ 14,400) 12-1~-7: STANDARDS; AUTHQRITY TO ADJUST: Parking standards shall be those provided in Title 14, development Standards. The standards set out in Title 14 shall govern the design and construction of all off-street parking and loading facilities, whether required by this Chapter or provided in addition to the requirements of this Chapter. Minor adjustments of the dimensions prescribed in this Chapter may be authorized by the Administrator if consistent with generally recognized design standards for off-street parking and loading facilities. {Ord. 8(1973) ~ 14.5D(}} 12-iD-9: LOADING STANDARDS: Standards for off-street landing shall be as follows: A. Location: All off-street loading berths snail be located on the same lot as the use served, but not in the required front setback. Off-street loading berths shall be provided in addition to required off-street parking and shall not be located within accessways. B. Size: Each required loading berth shall be not less than twelve feet wide, twenty five feet Long, and if enclosed andlar covered, fourteen feet high (12' x 25' x 14'}. Adequate turning and maneuvering space shall be provided within the lot lines. C. Access: Ac4essways not 9ess than ten feet (10'} or more than twenty feet {20'} in width shall connect all ;oading berths to a street cr alley. Such accessways ra~ay coincide with accessways to parking facilities, (Ord. 26(1982} ~ 5: Ord. 8(1973} § ;4.542} 12-10-1 (1: PARKING REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE: Off-street parking requirements shall be determined in accordance with the following schedule: • A. The fallowing schedule applies to properties within Vail's "Commercial Core Areas" (as defined on the Town of Vaii Commercial Core Area Parking Zones Map, incorporated by reference). Use Dwelling Unit Accommodation Unit `.Hotels with Convention Facilities (Banks and Financial Ins#itutions ~ i Eating and Drinking Establishments Hospitals e (Medical and Dental Offices 'Other Professional and Business Offices Quick-Service Food /Convenience Stores Recreational Facilities, Public ar Private -_~.~_ Paricing~Requirement _~ 9.4 spaces per dwelling unit 0.7 spaces per accommodation unit 0.7 spaces per accommodation unit, plus 1.0 space per 11 seats devoted to meetingllecture seating spaces per 1,000 gross square feet 1.O space per 12 seats 1.0 space per patient bed plus 1 space per 150 square feet of gross floor area L 7 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet ~2.7 spaces per 1,000 grass square feet 5 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet Parking requirements to be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission Parking requirements to be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission 1 Stores, Personal Services and Repair -Furniture Store -Art gallery - I _ [~rnrAnf Ctnrc~ Roams, C©nvention Facilities 1.0 space per 11 seats Theaters blot Listed ~ .. -- - 1.0 space per 8 seats Parking requirements to be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission For the ourooses of calculating oarkina reauirerrien#s. timeshare units. fractional fee units, and other forms of interval ownershi4 units are considered "accamrnodation units." 2.3 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet • B. The following schedule will apply to properties outside Van's "Commercial Core Areas" (as defined an the Town of Vail Commercial Core Area Parking Zones Map, incorporated by reference}: Use (Dwelling Unit _ - ~If gross residential Hoar area is 500 square feet ©r less: if gross residential floor area is over 500 square feet up to 2,000 square feet: if gross residential floor area is 2,000 square feet ar more per dwelling unit: Parking Requirement 1.5 spaces per unit 2 spaces per dwelling unit; 2.5 spaces per dwelling unit Accommodation Unit 0.4 space per accommodation unit, plus 0.1 space per each 100 square feet of gross residential floor area, with a maximum of 1.0 space per unit (Banks and Financial Institutions (Eating and Drinking Establishments 1 space per 200 gross square feet 1 space per 8 seats Hospitals 1 space per patient bed, plus 1 space per 150 Medical and ©entai Offices - Other Professional and J3usiness Offices Quick-Service Food f Convenience Stares Recreational Facilities, Public or Private - Athieticl~Gym General Retail Stores, Personal Services and Repair Slaps -Furniture Store -Art Gallery ~_ -Grocery Store Gas Station" -with automotive service -with sit dawn dining (Theaters, Meeting Rooms, Convention Facilities square feet of gross floor area ~i 1 space per 200 gross square feet 1 space per 250 gross square feet 1.0 space per each 200 square feet of gross floor area for the first 1,040 square feet of gross floor area: 1.0 space per 300 square feet for gross floor area above 1,000 square feet Parking requirements to be determined by the Planning and Environmental C©mmission 4.5 spaces per 1,400 gross square feet 1 space per 300 gross square feet 1.5 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet ~ 1.5 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet 3.5 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet 1 space per pump 1 space per pump + 3 spaces per bay 1 space per pump + 1 space per 8 seats ~ 1.D space per 8 seats i Any Use Not Listed ~ Parking requirements to be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission *Total vehicle storage on site may not exceed 150% of the minimum required aarkina. For the purposes of calculating parking requirements. timeshare units. fractional fee units, and ether farms of interval ownershiQ units are considered "accommodation units." {Ord. 26(1982) ~ 6: Qrd. 8(1973) § 14.801). ~!2-1Q-11: PARKING SCHEDULl= APPLICABILITY: Where fractional requirements result from application of the schedule, the fraction shall be raised tc~ Lhe next whole number. {Ord. 50(1978} § 10) 12-~0-12: CREDIT ={]R MULT1PLE USE PARKING FACILITIES: A. Applicability: This schedule will apply to those properties which lie outside the Town's commercial care fas defined an the Town of Vail Commercial Core Area Parkins ones 'Nap, incoraorated by reference). The credit for multiple uses is not available to those properties utilizing the core area oarkina schedule." B. Multiple Use Credit Schedule: Where a single parking facility serves more than one use, the to#al parking requirement for all uses may be reduced in accordance with the following schedulev Total Requirement Permitted Reduction Determined Per To Determine Multiple Section 12-10-10 Use Parking Requirement 1 to 100 spaces No reduction 101 to 200 spaces 2.5 percent 201 to 300 spaces 5.0 percent 301 to 400 spaces 7.5 percent 401 to 500 spaces 10.0 percent 501 to 600 spaces 12.5 percent f301 to 704 spaces 15.0 percent 701 to 800 spaces 17.5 percent 801 to 900 spaces 20.0 percent 901 to 1,000 spaces Over 1,000 spaces 22.5 percent 25.0 percent {Ord. 8{1973) ~ 14.603} 12-10-13: LQAdING 4EQUlREMENTS SCHElOULE: Off-street loading requirements shall be determined in accordance with the fallowing schedule lJse Lodges with over 10,000 square feet total floor area, including accessory uses within the lodge Loading Requirement One loading berth for uses up to 75,000 square feet to#al area, plus one additional berth for each 25,OOa square feet total floor area in excess of 75,000 square feet Multiple-family dwellings with over 20,000 square feet gross residential floor area Professional and business offices, banks. and financial institutions with over 10,000 square feet total floor area Retail stores, personal servioes, repair shops, eating and drinking establishments and all other commercial or service uses with over 2,004 square feet total floor area Any use listed as a conditional use Any use not listed, if such use required the recurring receipt or distribution of goads or equipment by truck {Ord. 8(1973) § 14.701} One loading berth for uses up to 100,000 square feet gross residential floor area, plus one additional berth for each 50,000 square feet gross residential floor area in excess of 100,000 square fleet One loading berth One loading berth for uses up to 10,000 square feet total floor area, plus one additional berth for each 5,000 square feet total floor area in excess of 10,000 square feet Loading facilities requirement to be determined by the Town Council as a condition of the conditional use permit, but not less than the comparable requirement prescribed above One loading berth, plus additional berths prescribed by the Town Councii upon determination of need 4 12-1Q-14: LOADING SCHEDULE AI~PLICABILNT'Y: Where fractional requirements result from applica#ion of the schedule, the fraction shall be raised to the next whole number. (Ord. 50(1978} ~ 10) 12-10-15: CREDIT FDR MUL i IPLE-USE LOADING FACILITIES: Where a single off-street loading facility serves more than one use, the number of off-street loading berths may be reduced in accordance with the following schedule: Total Requirement Reduced Determined Per Requirement With Section 12-10-13 Multir~le Use 1 berth 1 berth 2 berths 1 berth 3 berths 2 berths 4 berths 2 berths 5 berths 3 berths 6 berths 3 berths 7 berths 4 berths 8 berths # berths 9 or more berths 5 berths (Ord. 8(1973} ~ 14.703} 12-10-16: EXEMPT AREAS: PARKING FUND ESTABLISHEI} -PLEASE REFER TO APPENDIX "A" ON THE "PARKING PAY-IN-LIEU" MEMO. NO OTHER CHANGES ARE PROPOSED FOR THIS CODE SECTION. 12-1~0-17; L1rASING OF PARKING SPACES: A_ General: No owner, occupant or building manager, or their respective agent or representative,. shall lease, rent, convey or restrict the use of any parking space, Spaces or area to any person other than a tenant, occupant or user of the building for which the space, spaces or area are required to be provided by the zoning ordinances or regulations of the Town except as may be specifically provided in this Section. B. Lease Qualifications; Application To Lease, A parking space, spaces or areas may be leased by the owner, occupant or building manager thereof in accordance with the following: 1. Any owner, occupant or building manager who owns, occupies or manages ten (10) or more private parking spaces located in Gommercial Gore 1, Gommercial Core 2, Commercial Core 3„ High Density Multiple-Family, Public Accommodations„ Lionshead Mixed Use 1, Lionshead Mixed Use 2 or Special Development Zone Districts and provides sufficient parking for use by employees may apply to the Administrator of the Town far a permit to lease parking spaces. 2. Application shall be made on a farm provided by the Administrator and upon approval of the application by the Administrator a leasing permit shall be issued with or without condition as determined by the Administrator. if the Town staff determines that the lease proposal results in a visual impact to surrounding streets or property, the Administrator may condition the approval with a requirement that the applicant install landscaping on the site to improve the visual appearance of the parking area. If said private parking spaces are located on the common area or grounds of any condominium project, written approval of the condominium association (if any) will be required an this application. 3. The Administrator may request that an applicant conduct a parking utilization study to determine the difference between the average capacity of the lot and the peak day utilization, and such other information as may be necessary for the proper consideration of the application. 4. The proposed lease agreement shall be for the period of not less than one month nor greater than twelve (12) months. When requested, the Administrator may extend the lease agreement for an additional twelve {12} months so long as the conditions relating to the parking spaces have not significantly changed. ,Any applicant wishing far an extension to an established lease agreement, must submit an application to the Administrator no later than two {2} weeks prior to the termination of the existing approval. 5. No applicant shall be permitted to lease more than sixty percent {60%} of the parking spaces wrLich is the difference between the average capacity of the lot and the peak day utilization as determined by the Administrator. 6. No applicant who is operating a private parking area charging an hourly fee on the effective date hereof shall be eligible for approval of his or her application. 7. Parking required for any use in accordance with this Title may not be satisfied by the leasing of space from another person under the provisions of this Section. 8. It shall be the responsibility of the cwner; occupant or building manager who has leased spaces to others to provide adequate and proper signs therefor and to see that the 9eased spaces are Used and occupied in accordance with the lease agreement. 9. Leasing shall be permitted for short-term parking only, and shall be prohibited fcr Fong-term storage of vehicles by individuals or companies. 10. Car rental agencies may lease parking spaces only in the CC3 Zone District, and shall be limited to a maximum of fifteen (15} parking spaces per site. Each site may be allowed a maximum of one lease for a car rental agency. {Ord. 3(1999} § 5: Ord. 47(1991} § 1: Ord. 31(1985} § 1: Ord. 34(1977} § i} 12-10-18: VARIANCI=S: Aar kin~~ric ~ 17 cf t1-ie T~Ic ci•~I;-~a ~~ti:,~~d t• ~~#~ i::i~ `.#~c Ta~w~'-s-R~~~I~ir~~ F' - ry~~~~,,~..r ~3{~~?7-~) ~}. VariarFCes fram the Qrovis~ons of this rha~ter shall follow the nrocede~res set #orth in Title 12. Chapter 17 of this Cade. • • Approved 4124/00 n l~J PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL G4MMiSSION April 1 a, zo0o Minutes MEMBERS PRESENT: John Schofield Galen Aasland Chas Bernhardt Doug Gahill MEMBERS ABSENT: Diane Golden Brian Doyon STAFF PRESENT: George Ruther Allison Ochs Brent Wilson Judy Rodriguez Greg Barrie Public Hearing John Schofield called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. Swearing in of reappointed PEC member Galen Aasland. (Diane Golden and Brian Doyon were not present). -Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk. 2. Election of 2000 Ghair- Vice-Chair, Galen Aasland made a motion to table the ChairNice~Chair election to the next meeting when all members are present. Doug Gahill seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0. 3. A request for a conditional use permit,. to allow for the consolidation of two units within the Wall Street Building, located at 225 Wall 5treet/L.ot B, C, Block 5G, Vail Village 1~'` Filing.. Applicant: Eugene Fahey, represented by Sally Brainerd, RKD, Inc. Planner: Allison Qchs • Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo. She said it was going to the DRB meeting on the 19th for any exterior modifications. John Schofield asked if the applicant or public had any comments. There were no applicant or public comments. Doug Cahill had no problem with this application and thought it to be positive. Chas Bernhardt had no problem. Galen Aasland agreed with the staff mama. John Schofield concurred with his fellow Commissioners. Doug Cahill made a motion for approval, in accordance with the staff memo. Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion. 1 Planning and Environmental Commission Nlinutcs April I (9, 2(lb~) v Approved 4124/00 The motion passed by a vote of 4-~. 4. A request for a conditional use permit, to altaw for one Type III and four Type IV Employee Hauling Units, located at the Vail Athletic Club & Spa, 352 East Meadow Drivefa part of Tract B, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Ron Byrne, d.b.a. VfUIL, L.L.C.„ represented by Tam Braun Planner: George Ruther George Ruther gave an overview ofi the staff memo. John Schofiield asked if the applicant had any comments. Tom Braun asked about the condition regarding the TCO. He said if that were interpreted to be any TCO, some of the EHU's might not be ready, John Schofield asked if the building permit would be for each phase. Tom Braun said very likely it would be phased, but we stilt need an interpretation of the TCCi. George Ruther said they could look through the employee generation impact. He said due to the additional square footage required and the greatest impact of the employee need, he would recommend the TCO be for the hotel and tractional fee units ofi the building. John Schofield asked for any public comments. There were no public comments. Galen Aasland said he was in favor of this. He agreed to build the restaurant, but stated a specific landmark should be set. Doug Cahill agreed with Galen, but didn't knew the best split, residential ar commercial, to tie in the employee units being completed. Chas Bernhardt agreed, John Schofield asked what specific partian of the project should the TC~ be tied into. George Ruther stated that essentially with a proposed redevelopment, i# the restaurant and club alterations were completed, the requirement would be reduced, so to tie it into the AU„s, FFU's, and condo units . Galen Aasland made a motion, in accordance to the staff memo, with a change to Condition 1 that the triggering mechanism far the TCO would be the constnuctian of any of the AU's, FFU's, o~r condos, and said if the scale of the project was changed they would have to come back to the PEC. Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of ~-D. • 2 Planning and Enviranmentai Commission Minutes April 1 ~, 240 Approved 4124100 5. A request for a conditional use permit, to relocate 13(~tl' of law-lying bike path, informally known as the Katsos Property, located at Tract A, Vail Village 12E~' Filing. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison achs Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo.. John Schofield asked for any applicant comments. Greg Barrie stated that the path was overlaid in 190, or once in the last ten years. He stated that this was not an emergency, but they are always looking around Tawn for improvements. Jahn.. Schofield asked for any public comment. There was na public comment. Galen Aasland said after a site visit, he couldn't see the environmental investment of all the resources to move the path and doesn't see how public safety would be affected. Doug Cahill said he was concerned that the Town doesn't have a permit on the existing path farm the Carp, and technically everything needed a permit. He suggested getting a permit for the entire length of the path. Chas Bernhardt asked how bad is it? He said he thought it was in great shape and that there was way more disturbance to the surrounding area by moving it. John Schofield said they were all in agreement. He said to tear up the existing path and put in such a small path, the environmental impacts would be excessive. He said his personal opinion was that Council would be wasting our good tax dollars. Greg Barrie said moving the path up the hill would get it out of the flood plain. Galen Aasland said we should be looking at the balance of environmental impacts. John Schofield asked for any public comments. There were no public comments- Doug Cahill said it was a balancing act and if it came back on a different scale, maybe there could be some remedy and this was not an issue we should drop entirely. Greg Barrie said if it becomes an issue with the Gorp., we will have to do this. Doug Cahill said what we have there now, I'm happy with. Chas Bernhardt made a motion to deny this application, with the finding that the environmental negative impact would outweigh the positive impacts. Galen Aasland seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0. 6. Final review of the Town of Vaii's revised parking generation analysis and proposed. amendments to Chapter 12-10, Town Code. Applicant, Town of Vaii Planner: Brent 1Nilson 3 Plannang and Environmental Cammissian Minutes April 1 U, 2UUU Approved 4/24/00 Brent Wilson gave an overview of the staff memo . John Schofield asked if the applicant or public had anything to add. There were no public or applicant comments. Galen Aasland said the reef demand was by the ski company, but we were given direction by the Gouncii to review this. He said he didn`t agree with the restaurant and residential space, He said that outdoar seating on the patio should be encouraged and this ordinance would discourage it and he would like to see another Joe's Famous Deli again. Doug Cahill agreed with Galen to encourage that type of use, without putting a restriction on them. He said as a recommendation to Council, he would like to move these issues onto Council. Chas Bernhardt said he couldn't do a complete approval of this until the parking plan was comple#ed next September. John Schofield said he was not comfortable with the original study and until we had a comprehensive look at the whole town, this was just putting a couple of pieces of the puzzle together. He suggested waiting another 6 months to do the whole puzzle and get it right. He said the study would have an impact on what we are doing right now. He said this should be recommended to Council as a good start. • Galen Aasland asked if Joe's Famous Deli was a conditional use permit, because it was a patio on public space. Brent Wilson said if wouid be a conditional use in order to review issues such as fire lane and adjacent property impacts. Chas Bernhardt said if this came up and parking was in question they would come to the PEC. Galen Aasland said we could do this similar to the General Use Zone District where parking could be reviewed. Brent Wilson said we do not assess parking for outdoor dining. Chas Bernhardt asked to table this. Brent Wilson said a code amendment would come from an ordinance and if the position of the PEC is not ready to finalize this, then you should table this. George Ruther asked for any PEC input before tabling it. Brent Wilson said PEC comments will be forwarded. John Schofield said he couldn"t support this as it stands as one piece. Doug Cahill said he wanted to encourage the restaurant. uses as in the past, but he can't make a decision how it blends. 4 Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes Aprs7 10, 2{100 • Approved 4f24100 Brent Wilson said that once the comprehensive study was done, the group's feeling should be incorporated as a finding. Chas Bernhardt made a motion to table this with the finding that it be tabled until such time that the Comprehensive Day-Skier Parking Study is completed to review i# altogether and that the PEC is in general agreement that this is a step in the right direction to encourage businesses in the core area. Doug Cahill seconded the motion. The motion. passed by a vote of 3-1 with Galen opposed and requested that his support for approval of the proposal be forwarded to Council. 7. A request for a variance from Sections 12-6H-6 and 12-14-6, Town of Vail Code, to allow for the addition of gross residential #loar area and balconies within required setbacks, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive, Vail Townhouse #2-ClLot 2, Block 5, Vail Village 1 ~t Filing. Applicant: Vicki Pearson, represented by Ron Diehl Planner: Ann K~eruif TABLED UNTIL APRIL 24, 2000 S. A request for a variance from Sections 12-6D_g {Site Coverage), 12-6D-$ (Density) and t 2-6D-6 (Setbacks), Town Cade, to allow for a garage and residential addition, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6,Vail intermountain. Applicant: Alan & Francine Peters Planner: Allison Qchs TABLED UNTIL APRIL 24, 2400 9. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a proposed expansion at Vail Mountain School, located at 3tG~0 Katsos Ranch RoadfPart of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village t 2th Filing. Applicant; Vail Mountain 5choo[, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Architects Planner: Brent Wilson TABLED UNTIL APRIL 24, 2400 10. A request far a work session to discuss a proposed major amendment to Special Development District #4 (Cascade Village}, located at 100~D 5. Frontage Road West Glen Lyon Office Building}/tot 54, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant; Dundee Realty, represented by Segerberg Mayhew Architects Planner: George Ruttier TABLED UNTIL INAY 22, 2400 5 P4anning and E=nwironmental Commission Minutes April f 0, 2000 Approved 4/24/OQ ~ 1. A PEC review of proposed modifications to the Gore Creek Flood Plain, located at the Gore Creek Whitewater Panic, Gore Creek Promenade~Tracts I & A, Block 5B, Vail Village 15` 1=fling. Applicant: Vail Valley ~`ourism and Convention Bureau Planner: Brent Wilson TABIIwED Galen Aasland made a motion to table items 7-1 f to their respective dates- Chas Bernhardt seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0. 12. Information Update a Tawn Gauncs'i joint worksession with the PEC on May 2Rd, at 1 p.rn. in the Town Council Ghannbers. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss philosophy related to development review projects and how to coordinate between the two boards. One two-year term PEC vacancy- (Tam Weber). PEC REPRESENTATIVE AT DRB FOR 2fl00- Doug Cahill - Jan-Apr. 5, '00 Brian Doyon - Apr-Jun '00 Diane Golden - Jul-Sep '00 John Schofield - Oct-Dec `00 Chas Bernhardt volunteered to do the 4It9`" DRB meeting. Doug Cahill asked about the 7~' PEC member. George Ruther said we have made calls to solicit potential members. 13. Approval of March 27, 2000 minutes. Chas Bernhardt made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Doug Cahill seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0. Galen Aasland made a motion to adjourn. Doug Cahill seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0. The meeting adjourned at 3 p.m. Planning and ~nwironmental Commission Ivtinutes Apri110,20~U