The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000-1023 PEC THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PaOPERTY F. l~UBLIG MGTICE ~ ~ NO TIGE 1S HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmen#al Cammission of the Town of ~ Vail wili hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the ~ ~ Tawn of l/ail on October 23 200~1 at 2:00 P.M. in the Tvwn of Vail Munici a~l Building. , , p In consideration of: A request for a variance firom Sectian 12-$A-5 of the Vail Tawn Code ("Lot Area and Site Qimensions") and a reguest for a minor subdivision, to allaw for the creation of tn+o legally pla#ted "Agnculture & Qpen Space" zoned fracts of land, located at 615 Forest Road i a currentfy unplatted tract of land locafed in the North '/Z of Section 7, TownshFp 5 South, Range 80 West of the 61h P.M. Applicant: The Vaif Corporation Planner: Breni Wilson A request for a site coverage uariance (Sectian 12-7A-9) and setback wariance (12-7A-8), Vail Town Code, to allaw far a new front entry to the Mountain Haus, lacated at 292 E. Meadow Dnve/Lot 5, part of Tract B, Vail Village 1s' Filing. Applicent: Moun#ain Haus, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects Planner: Bill Gibson A request for a minor subdi+rision of an unpiat#ed pr+operty, formerly kreown as the Vail Mauntain Shap Yard and the Holy Crass Lots in Lionshead, to allow for the final plafting to create two tracts, locafed at 862 and 963 S. Frontage Road WesUUnpla#ted, Vail Lionshead 4th. Applicant: The Vail Corporation Planner: George Ruther/Brent Wiison ~ A request for a Gonditionaf Use Permit, to allow far the installa#ion of a temporary sail cantamination remediation shed, locatecf at 2313 N. Frontage Rd. WestlTracf B, Vail das Schane 15` Filing, Applicant: West Vail Texaco, represented by DGCk D'olling Pianner: George Ruther/Allison Ochs , A request for a final review for a major subdivisian and variance from Sec#ion 12-613-5 (Minimum Lot Frontage) of the Tvwn Code, to allow for the subdivision of Lo# 8 into Lots 8A, & 88, located at 1467 Aspen Groue Lane/L4t 8, Blqck 2, Lian`s Ridge Subdivision Filing 4. AppNicant: Rabert 5elby, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Allison Ochs The apPlications and information about the propflsals are availabfe for public inspec#ion during regular office hours in the project planner's affice, located at the Town of Vait Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The pubfic is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 479-2138 far information. Sign language interpretatian available upon request with 24 hour notification. Pfease cafl 479- 2356, Telephone for the Flearing Impaired, #ar information. Cornmunity Development Department Published Octaber 6, 2400 in fhe Vail TraiL ~ TOW1Y OF YAfL R i PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL GOMMISSIC)N PEJBLIC MEETING SCHEDIJLE ~ Manday, October 23, 2000 PROJECT QRIENTATION i- Community aevelapment Dept. PUBLIC 1NELGOME 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visits : 1:15 pm 1. West Vail Texaco - 2313 N. Frontage Rd. 1Nest 2. VA shops Holy Cross parcel - 862 & 963 N. Frantage Rd. West 3_ Tennis Court site - 615 Forest Road Driuer: George hICa7E: If tha PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p_tn., the board may break for dinner from 6:40 - 6:30 p.m. Public HearinQ - Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm ~ 1. A request for a wariance from Section 12-8A-5 a# ihe Vail 7own Code ("Lot Area and 5i#e Dimensions") ancf a reqvest for a minor subdivision, to allow for the creation of two legally platted "°Agricuiture & Open Space" zoned tracts af land, located at 615 Forest Road / a currentiy unplatted tract of land lacated in the North '/z af Seetian 7, TowRShip 5 South, Range 80 West of the 6`h P.M. Applicant: The Vail Carporation Planner: Brent Wilsan 2. A request for a minor subdivision of an unplatted praperty, formeriy known as the Vail Mountain Shop Yard and the Holy Cross Lots in Lionshead, to allow for the final platting tq create two tracts, lacated at 862 and 963 S. Frontage Road WestAl9nplatted, Vail Lionshead 4`h Fiiing. Applicant; The Vail Gorporation Planner: George Ruther/Brent VlPilson 3. A request for a Condi#ional Use Perrnit, to allow for the installation of a temporary so61 contaminatiQn remed+atican shed, iacatetf at 2313 N. Frontage Rd. WestlTract B, Vail das Schone 1 yt Filing. Applicant: West Vaii Texaco, represented by Dick Qilling Planner: Gearge Ruther/Bill Gibson ~ ~ti TOVPN OF Y~IL ~ 1 4. A request for a final reuiew for a major suhdivisian, to aliow for the sutadivision of Lot $ into Lots 8A & 88, located at 1467 Aspen Grave Lane/Lot 8, Block 2, Lion's Fiidge 5ubcfivisian Fiiing 4. Applicant: Rabert Selby, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. ~ Planner: AElison Ochs 5. A request for a final review of a conditional use permit and rezoning, to allow for the construction of Phase f of Danovan Park impr+ovements, generally lacated southeast af the intersection af Matterhorn CircEe and the Sauth Frontage Raad. Applicant: Town af Vail Planner: George Ruther TABLED llNT1L NOVEMBER 13, 2400 6_ A request for a site coverage var`rance (Section 12-7A-8) and setback variance (12-7A-6), Vail Town Code, to allvw for a new frant entry to the Mountain Haus, located at 292 E. IVleadow Driue/L.ot 5, Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1St Filing_ Applicant; Mauntain Haus, represented by Fritz.ien Pierce Archi#ects Planner: Bili Gabsan TABLL.D UNT1L NOVEiVIBER 13,2000 7. Appraval af October 9, 2000 minutes 8. Iraformation Update The applications and in#ormation about the propasals are avallahie for public inspection during ~ regular office hours in the profect planner's o#fice located at the Tawn of Vail Community Devefopment Department, 75 South Frontage Roacf. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upan request with 24 haur notification. Please ca61479-2356, Telephone for the Haaring impaired, for infarmatian. ~ Community Derrelopment Departrnent Published Oetotaer 20, 2094 in the Vail Trasl I ~ 2 i PLA111NING ANQ ENVfRONMEiVTAL COMMISSIC9N MEETING RESULTS ~ Monday, October 23, 2(}00 PRFJJECT ORIENTATiON J- Carinmuni#y Devel+apment Dept. PUBL1C WELCOME 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Galen Aasland Johra Schofiefd Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill Diane Goiden Brian Dayon Tom Vlleber Site Visits : 1;15 pm 1. West Vail Texaco - 2313 N. Frontage Rd. West 2. VA shops Hoiy Crass parcel - 862 & 963 N. Frontage Rd. West 3, TennES Gourt site - 615, Forest Road Driver: George 11(*)III~ NOTE: If the PEC hearing extencfs untii 6:0{] p.m , the baard may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:3(} p.m Pu b tic_H_earing - Town Counci l + C ham bers 2: 4 C 1 pm 1. A request for a variance from Section 12-8A-5 of the Vail Town Ccade ("Lot Area and Site Dimensions'") and a request far a minor $ubdivision, to al0ow for the creation of trryro legally platted "Agricul#ure &Open Space" zoned trac#s af land, loca#ed at 615 Forest Road 1 a currentfy ur?pla#ted traet of land located in fhe North '/z of Secfion 7, Township 5 Soufh, Range 80 West of the 61h P.M. Applieant: The Vail Cvrporation Pfanner: Brsnt IIVilsan MOTION: aeane Goiden SEGOfVD: Tom Weber VOTE. 5-0 TABLED UAITIL NOVEMBER 13, 2000 2. A reques# for a minor subdivision of an unplatted property, formerly known as the Vail Mountain Sh4p Yard and the Haly Cross Lots in Lionshead, to allow for the final platting to crea4e two tracts, 6ocated at 862 and 963 S. Frontage Road West/Unplatted, Vail Lionshead 4rn Filing. Applicant: The Vail Ccarparation Planner: George RutherlBrent V1/iIson MQ7lOIV: Brian Doyon SECOND: Tom Weiaer VQTE: 5-0 APPROVED WI7H 3 GQNQITIONS: ~ 4VAIL TOW1 s I. The applican# will record the apprQUed and signed pfat with the Eagle Caunty Clerfc and Recorder's Office by no later than Qctober 23„ 2001, ar priar #o the submittal af any applicatians for development review on fhe praper#y, which ever cames first. That #he applicant takes immediate steps to clean up the si#e, in conformance wnrith ~ Title 5 4f the Town Cc,de, which inciudes the remQVai of abandoned vehicles, trash, debris, etc. The applicant shall also take steps to prewenf surface drainage and erosion from reaching Red Sandstone Gfeefc. The clean arac# erasion work shall be completed prior to Nouerritser 15, 2000. An inspection by the Communi#y Devefoprnent Qepartment is required upon carnplefian. This concfifion appiies to all businesses on #his Ro#. 3. That there be no additional develapmen# rights granted ira corrjunctiQn with the minar subdivisian of this property. 3. ,A requesf for a Conditional Use Permit, to allow for the instalEation o# a temporary soil eontaminafion remediatian shed, lacated at 2313 N. Frantage Rcf. WestlTract B, 1/aii das Schcane 15` Filing. Applicant; Wes# Vai! Texaca, represented by Qick Di6ling Planner: George RutherlBill Gibson NIOTIBN: Qiane Golden SECOND: Chas Bemhardt VOTE: 5-0 APPRC3VED W1TH 2 CONDITIOR1iS; 1. That the #emporary facili#y shall be permitted for a maxirnum 24-month periad. The applicant shall en#irely remove the facility from the site and completely restore the area to existing conditions by no la#er than October 23, 2002. Should the duratdon of the facility be required far a longer periori di time, the applicant shall subma# a canditionai use permit application to the Town of Vaii Cvmmunity Development ~ Department requesting an extensian to the appravai period. I# shall be the ' responsibility of the appficant to contact the Department ta request an inspection of the site to ensure compiiance with this cnnditian. 2. The temporary facility shalf be used oniy for the housing and operation ofi necessary sail confamination remediafion equipment. The facsdity shali nat be utilized for accessory storage of gas sta4ion maferials (oil, tires, engine parts, etc_) 4_ A request for a final rewiew for a major subcliaisian, ta adlow for the subdiv+sion af Lo# 8 into Lots 8A & 8B, located at 1467 Aspen Grove LanslLot 8, Biock 2, Lion's Ridge Subdivisivn FFling 4. Applicant: Robert Selby, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Ailison Ochs IVIC7TIQN: Brian Doyon SECONCI: Diane Golden VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED VIIITH 2 COfNDITIONS: 1. That #he applicant will revege#ate #o appropriately screen the retaining wa0s and revege#ate any site disturbance in conjunctian with the driveway with natural and natiae vege#ation, to include Mountain Mahoag4ny, Snowberry, Seviceberry, Buckbrush, etc., at the time of ccrnstructian. 2. Tha# the applicant will record the approved and signeti plat with the Eagle ~ Gaunty Cferk and Recarder's 4ffice by Octaber 23, 2001. ~ 2 r ~ 5. A request for a final review of a candifional use permit and rezoning, to aflow for the construction of Phase i of Donovan Park impraverrrents, generaily Iocated southeast 4i the intersection of Matterhom Circle and the South rranfage Rflad. ~ Applicant: Town of Vail Plannes'_ George Ruther TABLEI3 UNTIL AIOVEMBER 13, 2000 6. Arequest for a site caverage variance (Sectian 12-7A-9) and setback variance (12-7A-6), Vail Town Code, to allow for a new fron# en#ry to #he Mountain Haus, IQCated a# 292 E. Meadaw DrivelLo# 5, Part of Tract B, Uail VilEage 15# Fiiing. Applicant: Mountain Haus, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects Plannee; Bill Gibson TABLED UNTIL NQVEIVIBER 13,2000 7. Approval of actober 9, 2000 minutes 8. Infdrmation Update The applications and information about the proposals are avai6able for public inspection during regular affice haurs in the projec# planner =s office located at the Town of Vail Cammunity Deuelopment Qepartment, 75 South Frontage Raad. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretabon avaifable upon aequest with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Talephone for the Hearing Irnpaired, far informatian. Community Development Qepartment I ~ ~ 3 REMINDER JOINT TOWN COUNCIL 1 DRB 1 PEC WORK SESSION TO QISCUSS THE PROPOSED VA1 L P'LAZA HOTEL W~ST SDD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2000 - AFTERNOON WORK SESSION ~ TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS TI ME z:aQ p.m. ~ ! # iu1El1J1ORANC+UM ' ~ i TO: Vail Tawri Council, Design Reviev+r Board, PIanning ancf Environmental ~ Commission ~ FFiOM: Department af Corr,munity Development DATE: flctober 24, 2000 i SUBJECT: A request far awork session #a discuss the establishment of a special develapment district to aIIQw #ar the cQnstruction of a new conference facility/hotei/fractianal fee unit club at 13 Vail Road / Lot A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village Fiiing 2. Applicant: Loramar Ho#els, represertted by the Daymer Gorporation Pianner: F3rent Wiison 1. INTRODUCTION The applicant is propcrsing a special tievelapment district (SDQ) where the Chateau at Vail is currently Iacated. The SDL is intended to facilitate the canstructian of the Vai6 ~ Plaza Hotel West, a new mixed-use lodge project. The current (and prapased underlying) zoning for the property is "Public Accommotlati4n." The establishment of a fractianal fee cIub and the constructiort of Type {II employse housing units will alsa require conditional use permits. The purpose of the worksession meeiing is to: a Present the proposai to the Town Gouncil, Qesign Review Board, f'lanning & Envirrnmental Cornmission and the cornmunity, ¦ Inform the Town Council, Qesign Review Baard, Flanning & Environmental ~ Cflmmission af ihe issues discussed be#ween the appiicant and staff, ¦ Engage in a discussion to forward direction and input on the various aspecis of the ~ proposal to the applicant and staff. II. ?ESCRIPTIE)N OF TNE REQUEST The Vail Piaza Hotel West is a rnixec!-use develapment proposal. Uses within the hotel include residential, commercial and reereateort. The proposed plan cVrrently incfudes a 120-raom hotel, 17 condaminiurns, 41 frac2iona6 tee units; 15 ernp{oyee hQUSing units, a 200+-seat restaurant, a50-seat bar, 7,788 square feet of retai] space; 28,972 square feet of conferencefineeting space, and a 34,106 square foot spalheaith club. , ~ ~ Ill. COMPA?iBILIT'! WITH PIJBLIC ACCOMMODATION ZONE DISTRICT The followsng is a summary of the land use regulations prescribed by the Public Accommodation Zane District: Accard3rg to the OfficiQi Tawn of Vail Zoning Map, the appIicant's property is zoned Public Accommodation. Fursuant to #he Tawn of Vail Munic;pal Cade, the PubliG Accommodation Zone dis4rict is fntended: Pa provrde srtes fcr lodges and residentlal accommodatrons for vlsitors, tvgether with such publlc and semi-publrc facrlities and lr`mited professiona! offiees, meafical faciJities, private recreatlon, and re]ated visitor oriented uses as may appropriately be focated rn the sarrre disrrrct. The Public Accommodation Distrlct is intencded to ensure adequate lrght, ar`r, apen ,space, and other amenrtres cvmmensurafe with lodge uses, anel ta rrraintaln the desirable resort qualities of the Distriet by estabtishing approprrate site development slandards. Addifional rranresidentiaJ crses are permittecl as candrtrcnal uses which errhance the nature crf Var1 as a v+,rinter and surrrmer recreatlora and vacatton communrty, and where permrtted are ta ;uncrion com,natrbJy with the high densrty lodging character of the Caistricf_ The Pubiic Accommodation Zone Districi is intended ta provide sites for lodging units ~ wi#h densities not ta exceed 25 dwelling units per acre. The Fublic Accommodation Zone District, prior to Jaruary 21, 1997, did not permii interval ownership. an January 21, 1997, #he town CQUncil adopted regulations ailowing interval ownership subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Previously, interval ownership was only allowed as a canditionaf use ir ihe High density Multi-family Zone Qistrict. Qn C7ctober 5, 1999, the Vai! Town Gouncil approved C}rdinance Nra. 23; Series of 1999, amending ihe developrnent standards prescribed in ihe Public Accommodation Zone District. The amendrnents ineluded an increase in allowable GRFA up to 150%, an increase in site coverage, #he elirninatian of AU's and FFU's sn the caiculatian o# densiiy, revised setback requirements, and ather various aspects in the developrnent of properties zoned Public Accamrnodation. The allowabie building height, landscape area and limitation on c,mrnereial square faotage remained urachanged. IV. THE SPEClAL DEVELOPNIENT DISTRICT ESTABLfSHMENT RROCESS Ghapter 12-9 of the Town Cade provides for the establishrnent of special developrrrent districts in the Town of Vaii. According to Section 12-9A-1, the purpose of a speciaf development district is: . ~ 2 ro encourage ;7exibiliiy and creativity irt the development of Jand; in Order t0 promate its most appropriate use; ta rmprave the desigrr character and quality of the new development within the Town; to faciirtate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilfties: io preserve rhe natural and scenic features of apen space areas; and :o further the overall goals of the comnaurrity as stated in the VarJ Camprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a Speeral l7evelopment District, in conjunction wrth ihe properties underlying zone drstrict. sha!l estabfish the requirements for guldfng development arrcl uses of property lncluded 1n the special development distrrct. An appraved development plan is the prineipal dacUrnent in guiding the development, uses, and activities of the Speciai Development District. The development plan shall contain aEl relevant material and information necessary to establish the parameters with which the special development districi shald adhere. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to: the approwed site pIan; fl001' plall5, buiiding sections, and elevations: vic€Rify plan; parking plan; preliminary open spacellandscape plan; densities; and permitted, canditional, and accessory uses. The ctetermination of permitted, canditional and accessory uses shall be made by the Planning and Environrnental Commission and Town Council as par# nf the formal review Qf the proposed development plan. Unless further restricted 1hrough the review of the proposed special development district, permi#ted, conditional and accessary uses shall be 6imited to those ~ permitted, conditional and accessary uses in #he property's underlying zone district. The Tow+an Gode provides nine design eriteria, which shail be used as tfze principaF criteria irt evaluating the meri#s of the prapased spec?al development distric#. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demcnstrate that submittal material ancf the praposed development plan comply with each of the following standards, ar ciemonstrate that ane or mQre of thefn is not applicabie, or that a practical salution ccansistent with the public interest has bean achieved. The nine SDD review criteria are referenced belaw: A. Design cornpatibiiity arrd sensitivity to the immediate environrnen#, neighborhopd and adjacent properties relative tn arctaitectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, r?isual integrity and orientation. B. Uses, aetirrity and density which provide a cornpatible, efficient and warkabte relationship with surround+ng uses and activity. C. Compiiance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 12-10 of the Tcawn of Vail Municipal Cade. D. Gonfiarmity wi#h the applicable elemerats vf the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Tawn policies and Urban Design Plan. E. Iclentification and mitigatian of natural andlor geologic haaards that affect the property an which the special development district is proposed. ~ F. Site plans building design and location and open space provisions d€:signed #o produce a#unc#ional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and 3 overall aesthetic quality ofi the community. ~ G. A circuiation system designed for bath vehicles and pedestrians addres$9ng on and off- site traffic c3rculatian. H. Functionai and aesthetic iandscaping and apen space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views artd functions. 1. Phasing pian or subdivision ptan that will mainiain a wvrkable, funct9Qnal and effiicient reiationship #hroughout the development ofi the speciai development district. V. D15CUSS1[3N ISSIIES Staff has completed a preliminary review a# the plans subm9tted far the development of the Vail Plaza Hotea West. Upon the completion of our review, a numher ofi issues with regard t4 the proposal have been identified. The Community Development Department recornmends that the Wail Town Council, Design Review Board, Pfanning & Enaironmental vommission, the staff and the appiicant engage in a dialogue an the issues that have been identified. 1. Access and LoadinalDelivery South Frantage Raae! Access - The applicant is propasing a revised access to the site along the frontage road where the joint hotel/service station access exists taday. Staff be{ieves the ~ proposed access to the service station is insufficien# to meei the needs of large gasoline irucks. As a resuit, larce trucks would be seni to the Vail Rnad entrance to filpine Siandard. 3here ss not adequate space for a gasaline truck ca turn around within the gas statFOn site. Therefare, the gas station access along the frontage road shouid be maintained at a width capakale of accommodating large trucks. Additionally, staff believes the proposed "harbor area" in the median (across frarn the police station) is insufficient in width to prevent the siacking of cars and impacts to the existing leve4 of service along the #rontage raad. Vail Roaci Access - l°he appliean# is proposing to utilize the exis#ing ho#el access driWe along Vail Raad. Sta#f daes nat believe the proposed aceess drive is capable of accornmadating twn-way #raffic as prQposed. Additicnally, access for fire trucScs and emergency vehicles aIong this route ts inadequate, Loatlinq and Deiiwerv - Staff stresngly believes loading and deiivery should oceur on the north side of the site (ins#ead of along West Meadouv Drive). Given the presence of emergency vehic6es (#rorrm the hospital and #ire station) and the provisions of the Town's Streetscape Master Plan along West Nieadow Drive, staff believes South Frontage Road should serve as the portal for bath passenger aehicles and delivery trucks. The loaaing and delivery area praposed by the applicant is insuificient and daes not allow for aaequate turnaround of delivery trucks. I# the laading bays were built as propasetl, delivery trucks would need to back aut ontct West Meaciow Driwe where canfliets v+rith pedestrians and emergertcy vehicles may occur. This is not an acceptable solution_ Questions: fs a flrte-way primary access #rom Vail Road acceptable? ~ Are both le#t and right #urn mflvements acceptable #ram the frontage road access? n ~ 2. Buik. Mass and Buildin Con#i uration Adthough the subject property dies 4utside the context urea fQr the Vail Village Master Plan and Vaii Village Urban Design Guide Pfan; staff believes these guidelines are usefuf in establishing a neighboncood characier and context for this proposal. Heiaht - Staff believes the proposed building height is excessive and out o# character w'rth adjaeent buiidings and the viflage care. The applicant has not established that this cfeuiation from zaning is outweighed Eay arty present or future public benefits. ConfipurationJLavout- Given the propased height of the building, staff befieves it is imperative to confiaure the buiiding mass in a north/south alignment in order to prevent the same types of sunishade problems tha# a6ready exist on the site. Given the amQUnt of streetscaping proposed and the high number of pedestrians along N/est Meadaw Drive, staff believes a courtyard entry along West Meaciaw Drive would kae preferable to an interior atrium space. Bulk/Mass - The Town Code establishes bulk and mass conirols including se#backs, site coverage and buildirsg height. This praposal involaes deviations from all three controls (aithough #he seiback deviations are below grade). Generally speakir,g, staff believes the proposed bulk and mass is out of scale with and disproportionate to adjacent buildings and ihe estabiished character of Vail Village J Wes# Meadow Drive. ~ 3. Deviations from Under1 in Public Accommodation Zonin As outlined in Sectian 12-9A of the Town Cade, it shall be the burden of che appficant to demonstrate that any deviation from ihe developrrient standards af the underlying zoning provide public benefits that outweigh ihe adverse effect af said deviation. The followinq is a brie# synopsis af the prapdsal's deviations frorn uncferlyinq zonena: • Setbacks - 0"-5` below grade; 20' above grade (20' requ6red) ¦ Heigh# - 84.5' tap of ridge; 95.75' arch. projections (4$' max. allowed) ¦ Site Caverage - 70.8 °!o below gracie; 62,7% above grade (65°>o allawed) ¦ Landscaping - 14.7% (30°,% required) = Parking - Town staff estimates a need for over 300 parking spaces #or the project. Th2 ~ applicant is propnsing 188 spaces (including valet), auestions: What types af derriations, it any, are acceptable? Under what conditions might certain deviatians be acceptable? 4. Emplovee Genera#ion For a point of reference, the "middle range" of employee generation rates for the praposed ~ develapment is provided. 5 hAiddfe of Range Calcuiations (source: Town of'Ja11 Employee Generatio.n Repart) ~ a) Fietaii/Service Comrnerciai = 7,788 sq. ft. @ (6.5/1 000 sq. ft.) = 50.6 employees b) Heaith Club = 34,106 sq. ft. @ (1.25111DOC sq. ft.) =42.6 employees c} Restaurant,'Lflunge;Ktchen = 6,015 sq. ft. @ (6.51'1004 sq. ft.) = 39.1 employees d} Canference Center = 26,972 sq, ft. @ ;1,r100(} sq. ft.j = 27,0 employees e} Lodging = 129 units @(.75iunit) = 96.8 employees f) Multi-Family Uniis = 17 units @(.4/unit) = f.$ employees gj Fraetional Fee UnitS = 41 units C7a (.4/unit) = 10.4 employees Totai Employees = 279.3 employees 79 existing er9-Gployees} _ 200.3 employees (X 0.30 multiplier) new employees = 60,1 employees Typically, the Town has requested that a developer pravide housing far 30°to of the anticipated number of employees generated by an SDD propasal. In this case> the preliminary "middle range" calcuiations wauld suggest a need for 60 beds (based on a 30% factor). The applicant is prQposing 15 employee hausing units on site for a#otal of 30 beds. Questions: Is ofif-site housing an acceptable solution? !s down-valley housing an ac~eptable solutian? 5. Landscapinca and 5treetscapinq ~ The streetscape improvements suegested by the applicant are cansistent with the basic provisions outlined in the Town's Streetscape Master Plan. Hawever, staff bekieves the layout of the proposed building dominates the sireet edge and imposes greatly upon the pedestrian scale along West Meadow Driwe. Staff believes a scaled back rr3assing of the taui3ding (cdnsistent with the provisions in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan) +nrould be more consistent with the established pedestrian scale and character of West Meadow Drive. Staff believes the proposeci landscape plan is insuffiicient in terms of overall landscape area. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDA?IC7N As this is awOrksession discussion, the Depar#ment of Carnmunity Development will not be forwarding a recammendation at #his time. A forrnal recammendation will be provgded at the tame of a final reviews The specific purpose of this vark session is to solicit clear, concise direction ihat the applicant and staff can use ta direct the project's progress. Sorne specific questions we are looking for answers to include: ¦ Is the Town willing ta entertain the idea ctf an 5DQ at this loca#ion? • What additionai information is necessary at th6s point? • What are the initial "red flags" for the proposal? ~ • Is access off of Vaii Road andlor West Meadow Drive accepiable? 6 I~ tJ~ ~ ~ _I E ~ ~ . LO . ~ . rc~. I v.u~ , ~ [A ~ - " ! I L 4j, 7 -3 ~ ?V'~~ ~ . 1 Y ~ r ~',I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ! ,-771 .1 T ~ ey N 74---• ~ ~ . ~ EE e I 8 ~-1 I f ~ f . ~ - , i ~ ~ LU i W ~ ~ i i ~`?1 c-~=<~~~'; ; - - - a ~„yr;-~P~s.t ;`t ~..+z^t , • ~ '~'v . I ,I' I I ~ _ - , - - ~ - ~El i17Z~~r'~- ~ r ~ ~I ~ ; , ` ED . - 4 " ~ I r ~ t/~:': - .__-e.~ - R'+~• .i I t~~ i ~ f e I~ ' EE - _'~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ` • = I 'e - _ ~ - El ED R [E _ a 01 ~ I Ei I - ~ ~--n ' • ~ t _ , ~ _ ~ ~ jr:, ~ ~7- 'j ~ LU L-:: J] 9 ~ ~ _ '~t JJ i _ ~ - - _ ~ . I ~ :a~ ~ I' •.,,~a I'I - IL - - B . T~ - y ~ , , --i ~ • ` ~ ' W O , ~ I ~ p r g l / °a I ~ x : - - - - _ ~ d 4-.+ s ti y ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ I I A ~ f Ie , 4nn ~ aao i `p Ln ~ [37 , ~ ~ y I = -ra ~ > ~ ~ - - -v G r ~ - - - - I i ~ - ~ i , C~ ~ . - I . C ~ . _2 - S ' ~ - - 61R1 ~ ~ I + I 1 ~ , ~ - ~I =Q I 3 I ~ ~;<C LU ~ , - ; ~ 13. ~ .U~rB i t ~ ~ a. e a r a s I ~ - ~r_.. - - - - ; . J ~ _ - - " _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , .~~o ~ i . . f/ i`. . - . ~ ~ f ~ C , ~ r I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I~ ~ } J ' ~ } I , ~I I ~ \ J _ i i ~ 1 ~ i ( ~ r i ll 1 - ~ II~f - i ~ J) i 1 i ~fJ ~J - 1.~ I I I ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ! d ~ ° _ i ~ ~ uu ll C2 Ja , ` , V ~ a ~ r , n , , 1 b ~ I~ ~ i ~ I ` - - - ~ /i i i ~ - , i ~ ljz~~~ai I ~ ' ~ I.~ I .J . • ' 1~ = ~ ~ ? i ~ j . . . - . . . i . ~ - a. . . . . . . ~ - . ~ _ . . ~J F=~: .'>iz- , . _ , ~ ~ . ` N ~ , , . .r _7 ; y _ _ . - _ : ~ _ . _ , ~ ~ . ~FU s U n , ,t , , ~ f~]~ x.•` ~ y~' ~ ` 1 . , C ~ u J ? ! f ~ f f1 ii, i ~ l, ~ r~' 5~r,4 ~ 'X ~ sf ~ ~ h' ~ , I + ` ~ ~ ~J J 1 y 4 - } , r , . ~ r E f . ~ 1 1 I d v. 1 ~ i/T 471 !l t { ~ ~ ~i ~ I 11I. ~ I~• ~ . I j ! ~ ~ U ~ LM iD 1 _ . ~ [L] icz r ~ f fi , f;n ~ - ~ C ~ . ~ . , - ~ , ~ , ~ - , I ~ ~ I l ti I i f I, , ; al _ ~ ~ - - I~I, , ~ . i I r II I I II I4 I ~ I I ~ JWN~YdI I I ~ . ~ i r ~ , I ~ F I ~ ~ I ~ ~ J ~ - k I F ~ I 9 . i i ~ , ~ ~ - II I ~ ~ ~ J 'I . ~ T I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I , ~ N ~ ~ ~ i~ 7T- ~U:l - , U • ~ i ~ M ! w" ~ l ~ ) k I ~ I I yy~~ ~ ~ a - - - ~ f ~ - i ~ i f f ~ C ~ c II I~i _ ~ ~ ~ - cn r ~ ~ v I , I -I I I, ` ~ 9 ~ I ED I , I , r I { I j I o - ~ I u 1 I - - ~ ~ q. N { _ ~ t: ?~.I_ , , ~ ° $ I_ °s Q g u ~ j 1 Q f . i ~n _ I - ~ i I ~ ry~ C 9 j s r ~ X7 r 4 E E~ - o : ~ a ~ 6 . [ ~ Q ! 1-7 ~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'f ~ E_ r I - - ~ sJ> - - ~ ~ ~ , ~ - s~ z < ~ I - ~I r C4~ f~ ~ e v Lr; M q~ 4 1 LL. ti V i r~ ~ t i ~ I~ I ~ ~ - 7I'_ i Il ~ ~a-- - ~ I V ! i ~ , 1 rr I~-~~~~~ Q O E7- - I - ~ ~ > ~ ~i F-rLl CP ~ _ 1~11 ~ ~ ; - --t. - ~ ~ - - ; ~ , - ~ < I 71 77 - J ~ - E' ~ ~ ~ - I ~ - ~ E i T=7f ' ~I IL- I !I _L-- - - ~ ~ ~ - - ' zU i~ ~ ~ ~ z ,_I I i - - - _ ~ - - ~ , a r f c, r ~ C-4 ~ L kl F ; ~ L.L u ~ f - I - - s ~ n e~ - ~ - \ r~ ~ 71 .i I ~ ~ ~ I J tP~ I I i..~ i - - - a~ ~ - - I _ • ~ - - ~ L ll ' I O _ = r f _ -L Ti 7 I\J J l Oum ' ~ ~ ---J 4=0 I - ` - fi- - ~ I I - - - _ ~ :a ~ ~ - - I I _ L-- a ~ - ~ - ri I - - ~ - . - b ~ 77 r7 - - ` ' ~ ~ J4 - ~ i I Y, - e ` _ i~y ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ 1 I t'y c ~ `n j , E ~ -va , . ..i . _ ; I i ~ i ; - - - - - - - I In F' I - - i - - i o~ i N_/ JV I I - L 'P - - , ~ ; b N _ - ~ i' ~ ' L. 'n - I ~ ~ I ~ a - 7-7' TIT I ~u -7j - - - , I ~ J ^ n ' Ll- Z~ I ~ I - . - - - - " - - ! . i r- 4;k_ e N ~ Liz -09 - - - - °~a~a~ I; - - ~ - - ~ i ~ - - v ~ Ln . ~ ~ I ~ ' I ~ ' j jK~ I , ~ = 1 "E3, ~I ~'~_Q TJI~ p fiJ~ I~ I L7t p i. cr G ~ o~?] ~F _.;~~j q - ~ - - l1 ~ I ll i i i c - " c I~ ' ~ -a'~'• ~ ~ 3 ni II ~ I i~ ~ _ - - - I = 4-1 L-c V,~"~ I` ~I . ' - _ L6 1`•` I I-. I -'a , Y~ I ! L~T - - - 77 7 FT_ i _ _ ~ I 1y I ° ~ iffi I ~I . ~ - ~ . _ i - -Q - ~ f ~ - - - - - - - ~,c ~ a _ , - - - _ ~ } ~ N Vf T~.~ dy . ~ ~ QJ = y , - - . - - ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 _ •i7 _ - { I I - - ~ I I ~ Q J, _ ~ ~ • ~ : ' 6'~ ~ . o . ~ L <Yv ~ E ! - - i ~ r'- ~ ~ ~ , - , - _ - i -a o i~ i - i ~ ~ ~ - . r'" u , I J~ _ ~ N I I v o- ~ - FF~ - -I _ - ~i - I £ a• i ? ~ ~ oa - ~ ~ I1 I : ry6 4' o I ~ I i i?~o . i~ c•, ti 4pY '~y~-o I P ~ ~ I---- - ~ ~ e a . . . - I i . ____m~ - - ~ - - ~ II I' ~ ' ~ _ ~/N~~.- a.~~,'~~'•,~,yr~~.~. fi' ~ in ~ ' , i, I. ~ I + - - ~~~p' ~ i 4i. I 1; 4 . .p~y I. ~ ' - 3 \ 1 ~"`..GV C-c3 , - . ~ I I • ~ E ' 3.~''1 ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1---.-_ l ~ ~ " - ~ , ~ - - o _ , ! ~ - _ f - - J ~ i ~ 4 t f p a # I Jl~.. tl~ f-W im 9~ . r ~ ! I ~ ~ ~ . . _ • " V: ~ ~r N` r I i 1 _ 4Y ~ 1+ - II R ,r~ I - - ~ i E ~P f - 1 ~ f I _ _ a ~ " r ? .Z ~ .+'L^ + . I 1 I 'c ° _1. ~ '3 ^ J C7 JI pV \`4 I~ '1Q 2 II C~{' ~-.~Lh + r I a ~ n I i N - , - E 1 I _ ~ - ? Ln I ! I~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ J I 1 . f a e v € I = ~ ~ 1 - _ ~S i i LL ~ I I I - ~3 I I ~ ~ i J-I_j ~ I 1 - I - - - ~ ~ - ~II . =b~c•r I I ~T:w n. c-, i - - . . ~3 ~ - I i ~`eu - - - . ~ Jf ~ , ^ 11 . ~ { I I I ~ I ' - - I - I f ^ O ~ r ~..r. I _ O s - . ' - ~ ry . ~ ~ r V -r > ~ ry il I I ' ~ Ln 1 I ~ - - - - - - ~ I~---- ~ r ~ I 1 ~3 , ~ . ~ I il ~ ; 'u ~8 f ~ I - ~ ~ - , - ~ r„ ~ C!? ~ ' . 0 C ~ U ~ ~ I1 7 ~ I 4 _ . ~ ~ 0 ; R `n p " ~I , I p i ~ ~ P i i a ~ ~'i ..f ~ tl q - I ~ ~ - - _ - { ~ - i + + t'~ 1 ~ Cj c L:._ t ~ ~7 ~ ~ ~ I r ~ + ~ ~I I ~ O=Z= U I f! ~ ~ l i' I ' 1 ~ I I ; I ~ I i I ~ ~ 1 ~ I I I~ I f ~ ~ aza ~ ~ ~ - _ _ _ - ~ - ~~yrr • Y ~ ~ia. { Wy4 ry~'' ' ~ - - . ~ f h .r~~.$'~ YTi ~ 2~' ~ 4. ~ " 1.i\. ~ • ~ . -m't.' ' ~.1 ~16 . , ? y` ~ _ ;c S Sy r s ~ i ~ ~ .R ~ . a # ~ wi~i - ~1 i { k•S i . ~N~ 'P^ ~ ~f * ^ ~+•s ~ ~ 7?~ ~ - ~ . 4 'FM1+~c ~ J r ~"~`a:A~• . A R ~ 6v'~z+' '..'~.rb . ' ~j~ .''~°"y. P•, - - ~h `•d a 'A'~ ~ ri ' t.• ry~ . `~II • ' . k,}~ a 3- 1t y^ ~ ~ y 1 ~ aF ~1 II ~ f ~ ~ ~,.e u { Y_ . ~4 M ' ~ ~ . - ~ ~ , f ~7 ~ ~ ~ ? % r ~ Z*4 ' e . . 5 y ~ ~ 4 ~e. 7 ~ * ~.rw . _ ' . . . __`_yyID ~ i . 9 ~ ~ . . . . - LAN c ~ . ~j~ , x 1 ~ e i r ~ ~y ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ w ~ - ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ •5 ~4. ' . . `n. • . , ~ ' ~ ~ x ~ , ~f4 L+~ ~ ~i x : . i . r a ~ ~ t I e. : t 5.:'.. v k ~ + $ i . . "rh . d . . . , P.... . ' ( aa` - = Jc' Ck~ - . fy > / . . . _ , . w , _ ~ ~h ~ A~#~ 5~ ~ ~ ~ - tkC ' ~ ..p . ~ . , . . i . ' . ~ ~ rvG r ~ , . ~Y q ~ ~r•^~r s: • . i. I , x•'~+~Yr~~.~_ - w'`~ry s r: S = = t . . . ~ ~ - . • _ . . . { * . ~ . . 7W ,t. . "41i ,y{~ ~F,fY~,~~ yyy ~°y"`1' x h • ~ A ~ ~ A~ al'~ . a.t~M1~-. ~ R • 'i fl ~ ~ ~/1 •.e~. F { 1.Z~iY _ • ~ . _ j~. i ~ , ~ i .a o r F_ ~ . • 3+e+."~ . . _ . . _ ' ~ f •;i r , , L r ~ ~ . ~ T 3 : I ~ ^ ~ • d?'~ ° . ? ~i: t•.~ a mR r ~ a. ' ~ . ~ Jd . ~ ' ~ .'~T~~~~ ~ ~ , ~ - - . , _ - ~ ~ 3` ~ ~ ~t.`~ - . - ~ z '~a~ ~ _ , , ~i~~ ip _ p~~i., "`4w`~~ r , ~ ~ ~ ` k's. ~ v . i ~-;i ~ } 'w -a _ ~ ~ ; a~' . Y::~ O I - ' l_ ~ ~ . - " I , ~ ~ - _ . ~ _ r ~ ~ ~ . _ p~ _ _ _r . } . . x ; , t . ~J ~ - ~ R~ t,. , ~ I ~ ' ~ d ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ , ~ ,~J w'~'r~ ~ ~ ~ `•.'e'' 1 _ '3" . ~ ` . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,.g.,~ . Y ' , Y` h,~ ~~I . .y,~ _ .d@.q~~ A a 4~ " l 1'¢ ' a'"!~ fi a~ i~f rr t 1 , - rA . ~ ~ P . . ~ i . . . ~F ~ _ 'a _ ' _ ~ ~ L . . ~t. f - 6~ . ~_s;i .Y ~ r - -~~y. . v _ . . .,I, sa ~ - ~ ~ p - : a , ~ ~ ~ . y , ~ ~ r~ f; ` .~.tf'~ ~ r'~r~ M ~ . b.'~ . '~r~~~ 5~y . V 1~ I = ~ " e x i ' ~ + g ~ ~ - V~ * i ` , - - 4° , ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ` , _ ~ ~ ~ _ a~~- ~ a~~ i _ _ Y - _ i _ ~ i ' { ~ ~ # _ ~ i ~ - e~ - - ~ , - - e. - _ 4~ h 6 ~ 3 ' a ~ 3! 3~ss{~~° ~ ; ~ - ! ~ ~ j ~ - . .~..-~u~y ~ ~Y, ~ ~ ~ F~~ ~~~~n ~ r'~ F~ ~ - _ . ~5..~.. ~ „ ~ ~ y~ ~ f I ~ ~J l ~ ~ ~ , ~ I ~r 1*. ~ 4 " ' ~ ~ : ~ , . ~ . ~ ~ I g. > , : . ~ . ~ ~ a- , i , ~ - r , ; ~ ~ ~ # ~ ~I~ _ ~ ' , ~ I ~ 4_ - _ ~ ~ =t• ~ ` s _ r_ ' ` ~ r ~ ; # 4mY~ ,a ~ s ~ • ~ 3 _ ot ~ -t ~ ~ T> !Y d_ ,.F,. ~ • ~ 'J~ . 1 ~ -~z } ~ ''~"•,a+ „~y ~ 61^ . R Y ~ ~ PR ~ ~ t ~ ~ 'sw- ~ ~ , .,e. ~ • ~ •~e t ~ ~ ~t .~Z~' •i I I i i ~ s . ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . '.e._ ` s~"° ' ~ . , . "~rrJ r• ~ .r ~ 4, _ ....~x . e~ c y4 La„ ~ f ,1 ~ . . ~ . - ~y ~ 6i A F ^ti~. u Y' s v V ~ f ~t~ i ~ ~i$a, _ _ il. - ~F iY r . ~ , ~ ~ - R'- Y ~ i ~ . . . . ~ . . . ~ . . . ~ . ' . . ' ~ ~ cz ~ ~ . . ~ ;;f ` ~ ~ . ~A Yy~ ~~i -KJ S : Til ~ r f f"' ~ ! . y _ ~4 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - , _ ~ r ~ ~ G ~ ~ r r :0"' ~ 1. ~ c Y ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ • - , . . . . . . . ' 'r~~, t ~ w' - `f'. i ~ < ~ , . . . ~ ~ : i'~` ~ : r f ~ t. . • t Th... 1 1 ti^l_' . . ' i ~ 1~" . A , ~ f ~.Y .~:f r : - l :,b - . _ ~ :ik','. t t ,rY:' . ' ~ ' 4 ~il1G R~~. d~{ ' i ".s+'a ~v II~ - . - ~r ~ ~ - + ,yu : ' x • ; . . ' . K: P ..~4~~ay:'$~ _ Y " ? ~ ~ Jy- ~ . : - . . . ~ , • . ; , . . - , :,v~ r - r, ~ y a. . . . ~ ' i ~ ~ l ~ 1, : .r.:y ' ~ E~~ _ . ~L , ~ - k ' . t ;,e~ ; I~I~~~' r I~ ~R f y,Y~ I If ~Y'~~'~• ~ tsEfY~~~}. N'-+~ 'l I ~I I ~ . . ~i4 ' ; . _ ~ ~ ~ 'ff' ` i S~~ ~ ,1 ~ . . 3' M~- . . _ i!! ~ , ' t ~:v~ :J' ~ ~~.y^ { j!~ - _ ~ ~ . t+t ~ ':.~..~iV , + ~ . ~ ll' - n '~L . '3..a ~ .a - 1 - `a.< .t..,'ei:l Jh ~ ~ " zp~,~' x~ ~ . i m^,}~.. ,N ~ ~ a r q r- y. . , ~ ` ~~4 p ~ Y : ~ . . ~ - . t : ~ S ~ ~~i ~Y~~R ~ . . ' ~ - L' ~ ~ M ~Y ~ _t.'. ~w~- - 3 r' ~~'k 5E ~~7 M ~+f'.'~ . . ti:~~"^~ '1, .~J . y~.i~c'_ . - . - ,ts~i - . _ ~ -.2.A ~a? L. F'~ ' . ~ ~d' V' ~ . ~ ~ ~ = a ' ~ ~ - :Cn. ~ . :Y~i=~ . ~?~.~3'~ 'd'=~-c' - r; _ j ry .,.s ' . 'I . . S b' '^+a'~ " d I. ~ .u~~`; . , , t ~ T~» ~-w"c~'~s r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c r•'-* ~ ~ _ ~ ~~r ~ . , ' • ' iIW~ - - - . . , . . . ':`i:'~t~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ _ - ~ _ ; ~ a~j ~~jf . . ~ ~ . _ ~ _ ~ yy~ _ 'T x : ~ ~ ~ ~ . , fi~i~~ . . ~ ~ . . ~ S i ~ _ . ~ . . _ . . ~ C" 1 U ~ J . ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Garnmission FROM: Departmeni of Community Development DATE: Dctober 23. 2000 SUBJECT: A request for a variance from Section 12-8A-5 of the Vaii Town Code ("Lat Area and Site aimensions") ancf a request for a minor subdivision, to allaw for the creation of twa legally platted °Agriculture & Open Space" zoned tracts of land, located at 615 Forest Road 1 a cUrrently unpia#ted #ract of fand located in the North 1l2 of Seetion 7, Tawnslaip 5 Sou#h, ' Range $0 1Nest of the 6`n P.M. Applicant: The Vaii Corporation Planner: Brent Wiison DESCRIPTIC}N aF REQUEST This request does not involve any change in zoning; nor is it in conjunction with any request for devefopment review. There would be n4 grant of additional ~ development rights in assaciation with request. The apptication is for the processing and recording of a plat for a tract o# land that has been unplatted for years. MINC}R SUBDiVISION This request involves the platting of a previausly unplafted tract of "Agriculture and Qpen Space" land along Farest Road. Since the Town of Vail daes nat have an exemption or single !at platting process esfablished in the Subdivision Regufations, if is necessary far the applicant ta pIat twa tracts of land in order to comply with aur defini#ion of "subdivision." Pursuant to the Vail Town Code, a minar subdivision is defined as: "Minor su6divr'sron"sha11 rnean any su,bdivlsion cantainirtg not mare than four (4) lots franting on an exrsting street, nof inuolving i any new street or raad ar the extensran of Municipal facilities arrd not adversely affectirrg the develapmerat of the remainder of the parcel or adjolnirrg property. Since this request does nat involve any praposed development of the property, the Departmenf of Cornrnunity Develapment has waived #he requirernent far an ertvironmental impact report. The appiicant is proposing a plat restrictian so that the two tracts created under this subdiv4sion will continue to be treated as one tract for zoning purposes. Therefore, there wili be na gain of additional develapment patential as a ~ result of this proposed subdEVision. The plat restrietion 9anguage cornes directly from the Town's Subdivisian Regula#ions and would read as follows: t "For zonr'ng pur,aoses, the fwo lots creafed by this subdivision are to be treated as one ~ entity with no more than orae sirrgle-family residence allowed on the cambined area of the fwo lots. " VARIANGE The Town`s "Agriculture anc! Open Space" zoning cfistTict requires a minimum lot size of 35 acres. Since the proposed siie area of the two tracts is Iess than 35 acres, a variance is reqraired for the platEing of the two tracts. II. STAFF RECOMIVIENDATIGN MINCER SUBDIVISON The Cammunity Developrnent Department recommends approrrai of the proposed minar subdiWision subject to the fallowing findings: 1. That the applicatian is in compliance with the 9ntent and purposes of #he Subdivision Regulations, the Zoning Ordonance and other pertinent regulations that the P1anning and Environrnentaf Commission deems appliGabfe. 2. That #he appCication is appropriate in regard ta Town policies relating to subdivision control, densities proposed, regulatipns, ord;nances and resolutions arrd other applicable daGUments, environmental integri#y and campatibility with the surrounding larad uses and other appiicable documents, and e#fects on the aesthetics of #he Town. ~ The Cammunsty Development Department also recommends the following conditions of approval: 1. The applicant will record the approved and signed plat with the Eagle County Glerk and Recorder's Office by no Iater than Octaber 23, 2001, or prior ta the submitfal of any applications for develapment review on the property, which ever comes first. ~ 2. Pursuant to Section 13-3-8, Uail Town Code, the applicant shal6 grartt an easernent for seasonak public access along Foresi RQad where no pub[ic right-of- way exists. A detaiied access agreement wi91 be executed by Town staff and Vail Resarts priar to plat recording. VARIANCE The Comrnunity ?evelopment Deparkment recommends approwal of the variance from Sectian 12-8A-5, Vaii Town Code, subject to the foilowing findings: 1. That the granting of the variance wikl not constitute a grant of speciai privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classifiect in the AgrMCUlture and Open Space District. 2. `fhat the granting of the variance will not be detrirnental to the public hea[th, safety or welfare, ar rnaterially in9urious #o praperties or improvements in the vicGnity. ~ 3. That the variance is warranted for the fallowing 6easons: 2 ~ a. 7he strict literal interpreta#ion ar enfarcemeni of the specifoed regulation wauld result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship ineonsistent with the objectives of the Subdivisian Regulations, b. There are exceptions ar extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable tc+ the same site of the variance that da nat apply generaliy ta other properties in the Single Family Residential Zone District. c. The strict inierpretatian or enfiorcement af the specifiied regulation would deprive the applicant of priviieges enjoyed by the owners of other praperties in the same distric#. IIIZONING ANALYSIS The applicant es not prapflsing to change the existing zoning on the praperty. The faClaaving is a synopsis of development stancfards aandar the prescribed znning. PERMaTTED USES: Plant and tree nurseries; Public parks, recrea#ian areas, and apen spaces; Single-family residential dwellings, ~ GONDITIDNAL USES: Any use within public parks, recreatian areas, and open spaces which involves assembfy of more than two hundred (200) persans together in one building or group of buildings, or in one recreatian area or other public recreatianal facility; Ceme#eries; Churches, rectories, and related structures; Law power subscription radio facilities, Pr€vate galf, tennis, swimming and ricfing clu6s, and hunting and fishing lpdges; Public and private schoais and calleges; Semi-public and institu#innal uses, such as convents and religious retreats; Ski iifts and tows; Type I1 employee housing units. DEVEL{JPMENT STAhJDARDS: Standard Existinq Proqosed Lot Size 6,996 acres 2.604 acres (Tract A) 4.392 acres (Tract 8) Density one dwelling unit flne dwelling unit (total) Qne Type 11 EHLJ* One Type II EHU" (to#al) GRFA 2,040 sq. ft. 2,000 sq. ft_ (500 sq. ft. EHU)` (500 sq. ft. EHU)* ~ *sUbject to the issuance af a conciit€anal use ;permit 3 iv. MiNoR suBDivisrnN REvIEw cRIrERia One basic premise of subdivision regulations is that the minimum standards far the creation of a new Cat must be me#. The first set of review criteria to be considered by the PEC for a minor subdivision application is as follows: A. La# Area The minimum lat size requirement in the Agriculture and Jpen Space zone district is 35 acres. Hawever, there is not a single Agriculture arrd Open Space lat in Vaik that meets this requirement. I# is not physically possible for the applicant ta comply with this requirement, therefore a variance applica#ion has been submitted in assaciatian with this subdivisian request. The proposed Int sizes are 2.604 acres (Tract A) and 4.392 acres (Tract B). B. Frontage Although there is na rrminimum frontage requirement in the Agriculture and Open Space zone district, the applicant is proposing a combined frontage of approximately 600 linear feet for the two tracts of land. C. Site Dimensians Although there are no prescribed site dimensions in this zane district, the Tawn Code does require that each site contain at least ane acre of "iauildable" (exciuding flood plain and red hazard avalanche zanes) land. This proposal compkies with this requ'rrement. Site-specific surveys deGneating the 100-year ~ flood plain or wetlands will be required if/when an application for develapment review has been received for the property. The second set of review criteria ta be consideresi with a minor subdivision request is as vutlirted in the 5ubdivision Regulations, and is as foilows: The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to shaw that the application is in compliance with the intencfed purpose of Ti#le 13, Chapter 4, the zoning ardinance, and other pertinent regulations that the PEC deems applicable. The PEC shafi review the applicatian and cansider its appropriateness in regard to Town palicies relating to subdiVision contral, densities propQSad, regulatians, ordinances and resQlutians and ather applicabfe documents, ef#ects on the aesthetics of the Town, environmental integrity ancE campatibility with surrounding uses. The subdivision purpose statements are as follows: 1. To iraform each subdivicfer of the standards and criteria by which deuelopmerat and propo5als wil Ibe evaluated and to provide information as to the type and extent of ierapravements required. Staff Response: One purpose of subdivision regulatians, and any developrnent control, is to establish basic ground rules which the staff, the PEG, the applicant and the community can follaw in the public review process. This applieation has been submitted according to the ~ requirements of Chapter 13, Subdivision Regulatians. 4 ~ 2. To provide for the subdivisian of property in the future wEthout conflict with developrnent on adjacent property. Staff Respanse: The praposed plat does raot create any conflic# wifh development on adjacent land. 3. To protect and conserve the value of land throughout the municipaJity and the ualue of buildings and imprQVements on #he land. S_taff Response: Since there are na changes to fand cQnditians or deve[opment standards prapased, staff believes this proposal will ncat be detrimental to the value af land throughout Vail, nor will it be detrimental to the value of land in the immediate area. 4. To ensure that subdivision of prc?perty is in compfiance with the Teawn Zoning Ordinance, ta achieve a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship arnong land uses, consistent with municipal dewelopment abjeetives. Staff Response: Staff believes the proposed piat will not preclude a harmoniaus, convenient antE workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development Qbjectives, 5. To guide public and private policy and ac#ion in order to provide adequate arrd efficient transportatiDn, water, sewage, schoals, parks, playgraunds, recreational ~ ancf o#her public requirements and facilaties and genera[]y to provide that public facilities will have sufficient capacity to serve the praposed subdivision, Staff Response: ThEs aspect of the subdivision reguPatians is intended primariiy ta address impacts of large-seale subdivisions of property, as oppDSed to this particular minor subdivisian propasai. Staff kaeiieves the granting of a seasQnaC publEC access easement will help facilitate more efficient transportation along Forest Road in the future. Staff does not believe this prpposai will have any negative irnpacts ort any of the other above-listed public facilities. fi. To proWide far aceurate legal descriptians af newly subdivided land and to establish reasonable ancf desirabie canstructian, design siandards and procedures. Staff Response: This goal of the subdivision regulations wil{ not be irnpacted by the proposed plat. 7. To prevent the pollu#iora af air, streams, and ponds, to assure adequacy af drainage faciiities, to safeguard the water table and ta encourage the wise use and rnanagernent of na#ural resources throughaut the munici}aaiity in arder ta presenre the integrity, stabili#y, and beauty af the community and the value of land. ~ Staff Response: Since this proposal ckoes not involve any construction ar developrnend, it will have no impact on these issues. 5 V. VARIANCE CRITEF31A ~ A. Cansideratian of Factors Reqardang the Varianee: 1. The relatianship af the requested variance to other existing or potentxal uses and structures in the vicinity. This proposal will not change land conditions or development potentiai for the praperty. Tnerefore, staff does not be6ieve there would be any negative impacts to existing or patential uses or structures in #he vicirtity. 2. The degree to whieh refief from the strict and iiteral interpretation and enforcement o# a specified regulation is necessary to achieue campatibility and uniformity +of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objec#ives o# this title without a grant af special privilege. As mentioned prevEOUSIy, there aren't any lats in the "Agricuiture and Upen Space" zone district that comply with the rninimum !ot size requirement. Staff believes it is impossible for the applicant to pkat this property without a variance. 7herefore, stafif believes 5orne relief from the strict or literal interpretation of the regulatians is necessary to achieve cnmpatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the abjectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distributian of ~ poputation, transportation and traffic faciiities, public €acilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff does not believe that there wiEl be any nega#iue impaets associated with this proposal vn the above-listed criteria. B. The Planninp and Enviranmental Cornmission shall make the foilowing findings before qrantina a uariance: 1. That the granting of the variance wilE not constitute a grant of speciai priuiiege inconsis#ent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance wiil not be detrimental to the public health, safety ar welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is uvarranted for ane or more pf the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enfiorcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unneeessary physicai hardship inconsistent with the abjectives of this title, ~ b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances ar conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do nat apply generafly to other praperties in the same zone.. 6 ~ c. The strict interpretatian or enforcemen# of the specified regulatian wouid deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed hy the ouvners of ather propertces in the same district. i i ~ ~ 7 KNOW ALL MEN BY FHESE PRESENTS ThIAl` THE VAIL COFtPC3RATaON, A CDLORAQO CORPOf2AT10N BEIfilG 50LE OWNER IN FEE 51MPLE. MC}RTGAGEE C}R LIEFiHDLDER OF ALL TFiAT REAl. PROPER7Y SITUATEQ EN THE 7t]WT1 OF VAIL, EAG1.E C{}UNTY, COLORADt? DESCRtBEa aS 1OLL(3WS: . A PARGEL C}F LANQ LaCATED IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTlON 7, TC1WriSHlP 5 S!c7l}'Cti.. RAfiJGE 80 WESi QF THE 6TH PRINGIF'AL MERIDlAN, NMICF4 15 BOUAiDEi3 (]N THE MQRI'H BY VAiL/LfOtJSHEAD, FILkNG No. 2 ANQ 3, AND tJN THE SQUTH BY VA11. VILLAGE THIRD ANb SIXTH FILINGS> (Al.i. OF THE ABt7W SU8D6VISldNS RECORDED IN 1'iiE OFFICE L1F THE EAC:LE COi11UTY, COLORAp4, CLERK AND RECORDER). SAlD PARCEL OF LAMD BEIHG MC?RE PARFICUL0.RLY QESCR16Et} . A5 FOLL4W5: BEGaHNING AT THE NdRTHEAST CORNER 0F LC3T 6> BLOCK 3, SAID VAtL VfIIAGE TiilRb FlLING, WN1CH RS ALSO THE NOR"{i-i1NEST C{7RNER dF La7 41, BLQCK 7, VAiL 'UILt.AGE FiRST FILiNG; THENGE T}1E FOLl,t3W1NG TWO CC3ltR5E5 ALaNG THE N(}R74-tERLY BOUN[3ARY 4?F 5AID VAIL V1LLAGE THIRQ F'(UNG. i} NORT}i 72 DEGREES 14 MINU"ff5 00 SECONDS WE57 575.00 F°EET 2) SOU7}-f 38 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 43 5ECONDS Y1+ES7 673.40 FEET Tl3 THE NC7RTNINEST CORNEft OF 1.OT 5, BL4Ci4 4, SAID VA1L VELLAGE THfRfl RL1NG, WHlCH i5 ALSO Tri£ MD5T NCRTHERLY CORNER OF l4T 1, BLOCK 2, SAiD VAiL WILLAGE SIXTN FIUh}G AND THE T'F2UE Pfl1NT OF $EC,IFIh1iNG; T!-dENCE THE FC1LLOWlNG SEVEN COURSES ALONG THE NtIFtTHERLY BOtJNDARY OF SAID VAIL VILLAGE 5lXTFt FILING; t) 50uTH 24 DEGREES 23 MiNUTES 45 SECQNDS WEST 259.20 FEET 2} 64.13 FEE"f ALONG THE ARC OF A CiJRVE TO TF°IF LEFT HAV{NG A RADlUS 4f 125:00 FEE'C, a A CENTfiAL ANGLE 4F 29 QEGREES 23 MlNUTES 45 SECQNi]S, AND A CHORD HMICH 13EARS 1VORT}-i BQ bEGREES 18 MfNU3'ES OS SECOhfDS INEST 63.43 FEf7 3) SCtUTN 85 DEGREES 00 MdNU7ES 00 SECOlV[]S 1NES7 200.00 FEET 4} NOR`FH 45 pEGREES Qtl MINUTES 00 S£CQNDS WEST 50.00 FEET 5} 129.59 FEET A[.ONG THE ARC aF A CURVE TO THE RIG?iT HA,ViNC A RADIUS 0F 275.00 F£ET, A CEN7RA1.. ANGIE OF 27 QEGRE€5 Ofl MlNtiTES 00 SECQNaS AND A CHQRD YMH1CH BEAfiS NORTH Bt QEGREES 3(} MIMU7ES QQ SECONDS WEST 728.40 FEET 8} N4R7N 88 DEGREES 00 MkNUTES 00 SECONaS WEST 270.04 FEET 7} NORTH 22 t}EGRErS 00 MlNl3TE5 00 SECOiNf35 €AST 130.40 FEET T0 THE NORTiiEAST CO#tNER QF LOT 2. BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE SiXTi-I FIUNGa NMIGH PS AN ,4N1G1.E PC?IAl? ON THE 50UTHERL,Y BO,JINDAR'( OF 'iRACT B, S,hIQ YAlLfUQNSfiEAf1 TFilRp FlUNG; THENCE.THE F{}LkQWNG FOUR CQllRSES ALO+iG THE 5t3t]'3'FiERLY Ht}lJNOARY 4F SAtO TRACT 9. VfJL/1.fOt+15HEAf). Ti1RO FtUkG: t)NtR"M 11 DEGREES 24- MMiUTES i$ SECflNE7S 'VMES? 69.38 FEET 2) wORTH 81 E?£GREES 27>:Wt+tU7ES 30 SE04MpS EAS'f 157.03 FEET 3?.. NOR'tR $9- i24GRIEES '23 MIN#!TES_; 40 SECONI3S EAST 234.53., F££ET , 4) NORTfl 04:CEGREES 35,M0408 ,58 SECOND5 YMCS7 9$.O0 RgET, 70 AH ANf,`L.E PdINT QN THE ~~IR.Y vAJL/u0N»M -~ECONO FIuWG; -TM~CE THE FOLLoWItac .CiuRSE s ALtNG~ ~s.a~a??f~'~`~' SAt~~ ~A~.~ 8,14A «:,:~ONsHEAD sEcaNo FIUtae,, . 1) NORTH 63 McREEs 24,. MNNuTES 010 SECONt~s EAsT 245.00 FEET 2) tdOR.TH 82 pEi3i2'EES 24 -MlAi[!i'ES 00SE£Qfi30S CAS? 111.00 fIE£T; THEhlGE At,ON6 THE EAST LfhiE C}F A PARCEL i7ESCRlBED !hJ REf:EF'TiOt+i No. 72{]988 SLaU'M 03 {3EG€tEES 08 MlNtli'ES 38 SECONDS EAST 400.45 FEEY Tfi) THE Tf2UE PQIN7 ClF 9EG1NNt1+1G, CGN'CA4N1NG 6.997 ACft£S 0F LANb MORE C1R LESS; HAVE 6Y TFiESE PRESEA17'S LAfD OIJ7, PLA'f'TEC} AND SU9DiL'tl3ED THE SAME {NTa LOTS ANO BLOCKS AS SHC}UNN ON THIS FdNAL PLAT UNDER THE NAME A.ND STYLE bF: FOREST ROAq PARCEI. A SL16C3iV1S3ON IN THE CpUNTY CD'F EAGLE, ANQ QOES FlEREBY ACCEPT THE RESPQNSiBILiTI' FOR THE COMPLETiQAE OF REQllIRE[3 iMPRQVEMENTS; AN[7 Df]ES NEREBY DED1CATE AND SET AAART ALL OF THE PE18L1C F20ADS AiVD OTHER Pl.18LIC IMPR{lVEidEfVTS ANp RLIkCEa AS SH(7WN ON THE ACC(siMPANY6NG FLA7 TO THE U5E C?F THE Pt1SUC FDR€VER; aND DOES HEREBY DEDICA7E TNOSE PORTibN5 0F SapD REAL PROPERTY WkiCH ARE CREAI'ED AS EAS£M£NTS 0N THE ACCt3MMPANYING PLAT TO THE PUBLlC FOREVER Aa EASEMENTS fUR THE PLJRPQSES SHQWN HEREUV; UNLESS (77liERWSE EXPRESSLY P'ROVtpED TNERE4N; f?NL7 13UES HERERY GRANT THE RIGHT TO INSTAI.I. AND ktAllV'FAIh# NECESSARY STRUCTl3RE5 7Q THE ENTa'fY RESf'Ot+ISFBLE FOR PROV1D114G THE 5ER'111CES FfSR 041CFi THE EASEMENTS ARE ESTABLISHED, EXECUTEQ THlS DAY bF _._._._._......__-~,.~.'..~.w.~. A.fJ., 20_,.___--_. ~ ~ ~ . I)r,i~•ri 1VS~rk;li,E~. l~~r inure.ni I~Iaiie~itir ALIoLlSi 31, 2000 .ionailian W. Greene Assistant DevelOEyrnCnt Ivlana.ger- Vai] i2estirrts L7eveloprneni Co. PC} E3ox 959 Avon, C(? 81620-(}959 Re: Polcntial environmeaital impacts of propcssed rninor subdivision plan for the Forest Paad Parcel Uear ,Innathan: This letter is in segard to the proposcd ntinc3r subdivision of the currently non-pi3ticd , Forest Rqad parLel lac;ated on Forest R<fact jusi south. of Gorc C'reek anci west of tlle ; I,iunshead skier brid-e, in Vail, C:olorado. ~ Our anal_ysis of potential enviroimletlta1 impac.ts assnciatec3 wath the propaseci minor subdi-vi;;ion ,ubmit#al is as follorvs: Genera! assessment Due tfl the I'act that [his minor subciivisiun submittal does not consist ot'any speci#ic dcvelopmenE applicat;on, anci does not seek any specific zoning change or development approvals, thcre are iIo anticipated environmental inlpacts resultirig from the propc3sed subinittal. Tn addition, given thac this minar suhdivision subrniita] ciaes not consist af'any specific deve€apn-ic:nt appIication, and dacs not seek any specFfie zoning change or devi:iopment appravals, these are no anticipated adciitinnal burdens on any gubiic infrasiructtLre, such as. but not limitcd to, sanitary sewer, waCcr, stnrm drainage, electricih+, roadways, etc. SpeCIfIG aSSeSSrT1ECit i 0 (;iven the above generalized assessi7ient, the following as a detailcci brcakdawrn of potential ; environmcntal impact issues thai eould result from any given project, anri ihe anticipated ' impacts tEiat couEcf result t'rom this minor subciivisian proposal. ~ 1. 104 rear Fluudplain. No anticipated impacts. No part of'this site Falls wvifhin a 1(]0 ycar f]oodplain nr floodway. ~ aESIGNWORKSHOP _ , ' Wetland impacks. No anticipated iinpscls. The proposed submittal does not seek any ~ developnlerit of any kind within wetland areas. 3. Avalanclie liazarcl. No aa7ticipated impacts. The proposed sLibmittal dcres nat seek any developmenT of'any kind within avalanche hazard arcas. 4. Rockfail hazarcf. No anticipated impacts. Tlle proposed :;ubinitta] docs not seek any developmcnt ot'an_y kind ivithin rockf'all hazard sreas. 5. Frasion. No anticipateci impacts. While tlsis propGrty does contain some e,xisting slopes irn excc:ss uf 34 and 46 peruent, tkiis sLihmittal dc7es not inclUcie any prespose;d de`-eloptnen1 t]iat WOuld result in ailv tsnStablc or eradahle slcipcs. b. Air pallutian. No anticipated impacts. 'l'tie proposed su6mitt«1 does riat include any cievelopment t}iat would creatc air pollutic3n e7t'an}° i:ind. 7. Noise pOliutinn. No anticipated ienpacts. I IZe ~.~i-aposec; subniittal dols nui inclu& anti, dewelopment t4-iat would creatc nofse pollution of any kind. S. Ligh# pnllution. No antic;pated impacts. The proposed suiamiktal cioes nrrt include any deveiopment that wauld create light PallutiOn ot any kind, 9. Parking impacts. :tio anticipated irripacts. l'he proposed submittal docs not include any development that wou[d create any parking, or add to anv exiscing parking. ~ 10. Visual innpacts. No anticipated impacts. The proposed submittal does ilat include any proposed ahovc or helow gradc developct3ent, and thereforc: will have no visual impacts on surroundint properties. 11. Traffic impaets. No antacipated impacts. '1'he proposed submittal eioc.s not inelude any developmcnt that would create any adclitional traffic volurt7e on adjacerit roadways_ 12. Site access. No anticipated impacts. The proposed submittal clc3es not inclaade any developli7ent that would increase the existirlg number of site access points onto the prapec-ty. 13. Brainage imp.icts. Na anticipatec3 irnpacts. The proposed sub¢iiiftal dnes not include any development thxt would increasc: surface drainage off of the property. 14. Infrastructure impacts. Itio anticipated in3pacts. The proposed submittal does not include any dcvwlopmerit that would inerease the burden on any public infras.ructure, such as, but not limited to, sanitasy sewer, water, storm draina9e, elec:triciry, raadwvays, etc. Furthermare, ttie property m qtiestion is currently served Uy existing sanitary sewer, water, electrical, and gas infrastructure. ~ ~ ~ Concfusion Giver, the above tindings, there are no anticipated em-irnnmental impacts uF arty kin~ a~;sociatec€ tiw-ixh the potential approval uftl7e pre}posed rnirlor subdivision plan. tiVhcn ai7d if`, at any poir3t in tlle future, t11i, pr-operty is considered lcar ,ul tIctLGLrl Jk2vcloprrient suhmittal, thcsc cnviranizie.ntal tacto~rs wFll tzeed tcr be re-eValLisatcci and rttitigalec3 isi Itght af thati prcaposed dcvel(-)prr:cnl. Plcase cfe3 nut hesitate to contact us if ynu have any questions regardin,2 thc abuve lindini-T s. Sincerek-. ~ K. Ethmi Moore .AaSocialc ~ 9 ~ a . . _....u__ ~ _ . , . . _ . ' c ~ ~ _ - - . ,r ~ . _ - --..e_ - _ ~ e ~6 .•i` xt - ~ r : dP p f C~ h ,I y~~ ~ r Y v ~ ~ r a ; `e z ~i~ : n t ~ Z4 1 f ~ ~ . u i F t 71 3 _ S}o ~ 1 - I • I ~ ~ ~ r . o w, / r , ~ d~ j ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ht ~ ,rpT/ Jryf / ~ t` a" ~ `;`r' ~ ~ • • ~ ' ~ ~ All.~ ~ kA - ; % ~ . ~ . ~ ~ j ~ ~y . . _ , 3 ' l . . ~ ~ . r ~ ~ 10 . , oe''~.~ LZ ~ . . Lraw OFFicEs • DUNN, ABPLANALP & MAURIELLO, P.G. r A PROFESSiONnL CORPIIRe71qh ~ JOHN W. DUJ4N WESTSTAR BRNK BUILpING TELEPFFQNE: pRTHUR A. pBPLANALP,. JA. 106 SOUTH FRpNTAfaE ROAD INEST (970)476°Q300 DIANE H. MAURIE4L0 SUITE 3ClQ FAC5IMILE_ INGA HAAGENSON CAUSEY (970) 476-4765 VAIL, GCSLQ12AD0 81657 coUNS~~: highcountrylsw.com JERRY W. WAN NAH amail: vaillaw@vail.nat CERTIFIED LEGAI ASSISTANTS 16AREN M. 17iJNN, CLRS MEMQRANDUM JANICE K. SCOK`IELD, CLA To: Planning and Environmental Commission, Tawn of Vail Fram: .Art Abplan.alp Subject: Application of The Vail Corporativn for Variance and Subdivision Date; 23 October 2000 Prior to consideration of the above matter, the Commissian should be aware of the following: ~ ` The applicant failed to provide the Town of Vail with a cornplete list of adjoining I ~ property awners, as a result of which the owners of five properties adjacent to the propased subdivision did not received nfltice of the proceeding. Specifically, the following properties were not listed as adjacent to the land which was the subject of the proceeding: Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Village 6th Filing (now a condaminium - two units) Lot 3, Parcel A, Blvck 1, Vail Village 5th Filing Lot 3, Farcel B Block 1, Vail Vitlage 6th Filing Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Village 5th Filing As a result of this arriission an the part of the applieant, the required nvtice has not been given to adjoining Property owners, and the Commissian has no jurisdietion to proceed in this matter. ~ ~ - ~ 1 a o~00 oopp0 00 0600 aoo a~9 O~pO,p O o ooq #Y~OOp9p6q0~7 06dd ~0 m 047O~Opd ~ O UO DCJ'O~~ [?~bd O fl ~pO ,~obar~otTODO 040'0O~OOpCY,OO OD4 00(1400OOd 00040 w~acOC]d6 OOOCSOO,DO 00 00~(YO QOO'000(]00 OOpO fl ~`'~a d d 00 OQQ04 Ofl0 pOp O O O OOC] OD ,~p O,fS00 o ~ o c~ao 00 ooaoao i.~ 000 0 0 ~ p ~ Qp ~ o a'.4 p °ooo 00o a ao f~oo qopu po o[\ ~r ~~o ocr~n o 00 ra ooO .7. p4iS~E7{7 ~ ~'`~."i~r. ~0QO0 . 00 . (fd 04? C79Q CfOt 0 00 00 00 oo.,--,~ r do WH1TE RIVER t 0 0d"O 4~ V p j ~ ~fr~ Q4+00C OopO%A .p~6{ 1 fs iis.f..4fY4E> 0 ~UOOQ - 0000 a o000 (300 OOD 00000 ~ ES~.Jf3~~1L~.~(~. N. E a°q° o v o°p o° °qo, o LQT 7, BL{7C1C 2, VAI L POTA70 PATCH A, 00 c~SO 00 d b o `d Q 0000.00 000 . . ~9f ,5.. . . _.u, 00 p ~ - , DOU 00 ~47 p n. . u rr.. a ~q o o cto o ' 0 0 10 o o VA, I L POTATO R4TC N ~ c o00 o°a~ac o~o° oobo S'~COND F1~.1NG 0 sr.~ p "OCJO~O 0O00000 ;yr C ~ G $ D : . , . • r ~ v 1 00.. . x .d~., ~ -r ' . . OCOdO O01~00 ~,ikvt,+I E Op000 ! 1 ~ ar. n ApY ~//y~ 11I, ' ~•a ..arc,v 4t'~ T 8 ; ~ t {t i Nl.. ~ I 1 .iii/""`~`'n ,li.. .1•.''1 , . 1( ..5 ~ \f A e ~ .w ik . , I` INTERSTATE 70 ~ ~ . iC , V rL LlO[VSHEAD i i , DN~ ~C3Sf L . . . . • . - i i . • asaK¦c • • • ~ ~ . f TRtaTUfi ~ • ~ . T?,~~i~ ~ 1 * • + ' • ~ • • / 1 ~ i ~ • i ~ j ~ ~ • • • • ~ ~ ~ • f~ ~ ~ • ~ * ~ • • i ~j ~ ' S r~ D 7 R - - _ - 't1 F cL.e °ILLAG'E { t ~ _ING ~ . ~.iVlr. 05/,. • ~ ...1+ ~ „ • k ~ • ,i~~. ~ ' ~ sm ~ i f"yiiiiilriiii 11 ~5TME . -t,iFiieiiiri~ii.~fi~ir~• ` W ~ . .~r.• .ir~iiiiir~ii~sil/frir/i•. ~~r.. I) . . A • ti~ fiRM7f~ .~,ii?/ii/ri1 r~i~iair:iiri?f ~ ~y . ~44 ~ ~Qd~ _ f . i iri~isii ~ ~d~0~ .,rr..c "iii~ /r ,a/ ~i . QOQO •i?rFr"~atr._.,w ,r .i. r.. b.. a 0 6 '~y,/AYMI + ~ • ~ . iiT , iiii~i~f/r . .~o., ~ir r~ir/iii ~O b O O~ ~ . L . , • ii ,l~,r~~/~i// .i f/rii ~I1~i/~I ~ OE~O~ Q i/~1~..'~,I,1;Iry EN Q ! ~(#Nl O ~q 4 O O d . ' • Qu G O 096. ~'J'~Q OQ ~O O~Oo O OnO b O O O 0 0 4 O .ii/,~ii?iiii iii 6 ~OJJQ ~OQO OOQO ~0,6aQt7 6 O G i a,•, i, ~,TF7~AL~7{$ , ir/!r ~E/~~,+Iii ii ~qd0 O nO~ Oa~Q 6 0060 ~0 0-- p~rO0O O O ,~n...~i„ OD~O O , O O O O 9~ 6 D~ i i~fi~iiiii~f~rir~? O C O 4POCy ODO~{J~ 90 O O ~ Oa O~L)O ' i p~ ~p q"~r - _ . ii ii?~fi?ri~ir~~~rtr ~ O O.~O O O .1... ~rrrirr~isf?ri/~i~ .qQ O O Q O O O O O - F'p 9 4 4 O 6 O O O O4 t~ D e ~~vrifirifriiris O O O 0 P Q O O ~ q i Ci O O~ . a 0~6QC7 . d ST siiirirr .~~O O , q OC,O OQ O ~ 4~do~~d~. ~7 OQ . o0 06o~ 0 Q~ ~p QO O~~~OQ O Q ,erp p O O O 4 Q O0 0 o~D G~d~ dQ ?~0 IJ O a O ?4 Q O Q ,r~ O QOO D~O O~O gO O~O Q ~O'QO o OflD~O .06QQQ~~~ ~~C~,~74q0~ ~1 4 0 ~ O O O~ ~O OC O O vO4 ~O ~O d O v . p O~ OO p~ D~ A 4 ~~Ei~ f p~7 (3 O O~ TR CTA avO O i6 O 0 O O J4 Q O 9 O O O O ~ i/ sJ O O o O O O o Op O,,,...III O; i J~r• . 0 O~OOO ,O O4 0000000 fl,., O~O dQK?o, OQd C48 a ~ Cq FpaQO Q. bQ O O a 0 b~ OQ O . ~ ~~6 jQ C O O O~ Q Qp~ q6 Q O'~F~R4^~J~'!yA d O O~OCO~yO O C~ ,~D~yQ . Qp Opa Op Q O Q~d~4~=0 0~4 U~O ~~a OCjO 9M Q0160 39p O o~(J O,q Oi006 O O O O OO 0 O~D O OO O O O O ~ d"d O Ofl O,., D O O ~ O Q O b 4 O O O o G~ O D O~ ~o~~O~ o no 0 r.~ ~~~i~~~~ „O Q O O O 6 O O O 4..rJ O 0-01 : .i. V4 MC}RC S BDIVI I 1L LIONSH~AD - Ist. FILING, Is-_ ,ADD. • w..,.. ~.r...'.,~~: WH1TE R!V AT10 AL F ~ List of Ad'acent Pro er Owners - Vail Car oration Variance Subdivision Name, Address, Teleghone Praperty in Vail Town of Vail Unplatted area including and 75 South Frontage Road West adjacent ta Gore Creelf Vail CO no address 81657 Charles Ying Vail Village Faling 6 136 Hollister Ave. Black 1, Lot A Santa Monica CA 486 Forest Road 90405 T& L Properties Vail Village Filing 6 19 Ginger Road Block 1, Lot 2(House in the Forest Condo) `tTalley NE 6$064 556 Forest Raad ~ West Fcarest Road Associates Vai1 Village Filing 6 ~ 2730 Irving Blva. Block 1, Lot 3, Parcel A Dallas TX 75207 586 Forest Raad Lawrence F. Field, Trustee VaiI Village Filing 6 ~ I500 Nicholas Blvd Black 1, Lot 3, Parcel B ~Ellc Grove Village IL 60007 586 Forest Raad 3erard F. Maher and Joan S. Maher Vail Village Filing 6 ~ 251 Fowler Road Block 2, Lot 2 Far Hills NJ 07931 625 Forest Road Nanette Elenbaas Living Trust Vail Village Filing 6 Nanette S. Eienbaas Trustee Block 1,Lat 4W 3328 Oakdale 600 (gosted as 596)Forest Road Hickory Corners MI 49060 Robert G. anci J. Phillips Vail Village Filing 6 El Pasa Energy Resources Block 1, Lot.4E 1001 Louisiana 5t 3048B bOQ Forest Road ~ Houston TX ~ 77002 ~ Julia lrene Kauffman Vail Village Filing 6 4707 W 86`b St Block 1, Lot 6 Prairie Village KS 636 Forest Road 66207 Erik D. and Joan Prinee Vail ViFlage Filing 6 3006 NFork Hwy Block 1, Lot 6 Wapiti WY 636 Fozest Road 82450 George R. Cannon Vail Village Filing fi 36 Steele St Ste. 250 Block 1, Lot 5 Denver Cfl 616 Forest Road t 80206 Marie Working Marital Trust Vail Village Filing b 503 1VIt Evans Rd Black l, Lat 13 , Golden CO 726 Forest Road r 80401 ~ IWorris Family Charitable Vclll Vlllage F1Jlflg 6 Remainder Unitrust BTock 1, Lot 1 PO Bax 112 486 Forest Road Boston MA 02117-0112 John W. Jordan II Revocable Trust Vail Village Filing 6 875 N. Michigan Ave Block 2, Lot lA #4020 483 Beaver Dam Road Chicago IL 60611 G2 Cansultants Vail Village Filing 5 238 Alameda De Las Pulgas Block 2, Lot 1B Athertan CA 463 Beaver Dam Road 90427 David P. and Alexandra L. Ransburg Vaii VilIage Filing 3 509 E High Point Block 4, Lot S ~ Pearia lL 463 Beaver Dam Road ~ 61614 SENT BY : 1 Q- 23- 0 ;12 :48PM ; EAGLE COiJIYTY- 9704764765 1 d 5 10123100 Eagle County Assessar page, 1 12:46PM Property Racord Card far Ar.count R034102 as crf 08103/2000 version 20000803000 WES7 FOREST ROAD AS3OC Accuunt: R034102 Parcelr 210107291024 0 IRWING 6LVD Campany: 5itus Addre66; Tax Area: SC903 000583 FUREST RD ~ OVALLAS Acres: VAIL ~ TX, 75207 VALUE SUMMARY LEGAL DESCRlP71QN (May f~ at b$ cotnplete) Value By: MICA 17tirerride SU6:VAIL'UILlAGE FILING 8 BLK:1 LAND 687,504 0 l.0 i:3 QESG: PARCE'L A 8K-0546 5 F R 2, G60,21 0 Q F' G- 0 5 7 1 M A p 0 1- 2 8-9 1 B K- p 54fi XFQ6 16,590 PG-0572 l.7EC: 0 1-24-91 Tatai valua: 2,764,400 o LAND DA7A . , . . . LAND Occurronca i ABSTStACT COOE 1112 SINGLE FAM.RES.-IAND LANDBlZE 19822 LANbSIZE LAND_CODE 7054 FQRZ5T ROAQ W NEIGHBORHOQd 244 VftIL V€LLAGE FlLE 9 UNII'_TYPE 4 UN1T_TYPE USE_CODE 1000 RESIOENTIAL ZON(NG 9 PS SUPER MBHQ 200 VA.IL CORE, L.H., GOLFCt7 LAMO_iN0 26 SURCODE ACTt1AL EFFECTI'JE HEA'CED FQOTPRItrkT LAND_L 0,500 T07AL AREA: 0,500 VALUE RATE 687,500 1,375,fl0ii.00 EXTRA FEATURE DATA XFOB pccurr$nco 1 1212 SINGLE FAM.RES-IMPROVEPVIT E~UILDING_k0 0 BUILDINGI~0 &,RACT-CODF- 1991 YE~kR-1991 EFF_YEAIi_BLT ~ 1991 EFF~YEAR BL7 NEIGMB()RHOOD 244 VAIL VILf_AGE FILE 6 UN17 ARIGE 3816 UNIT_PRIGZ USE_CODE 1000 f2ESI0EtJ7iAL XFCtB_COl7E 120 FIREFL. G. SUPER_NSHD 200 VAIL CORE, l..H., GOI-FCOUhSE ' SUBCOi}E ACTUAL EFFEGTIVE HEATED FOOTPRINT XFOB_UNITS 3.000 rorAL AREq; 1_000 VALUE RATE • 4,070 4,070.00 , . ExrttA FEaTURE mara XFOB Occurrence 2 ASSTRAC7_CODE 121251NGLF- FAM.RES-Ih1PRpVEMT SUiLDiNG_NO a BUILDING. FJO DEP40 1991 YEAR- €991 EFF`YEAR BLT 1991 EFF_YEAR 9LT NEIGHSt1RHOaU 244 VAfL VlLLAGE F1LE 6 l1NlT_PftICE 3816 UN1T PRlCE U8E CQDE 1004 RESIdENTIAI. XFt3B C017E 410 STEAM SN G 3UPER N8N0 200 VRIL CQRE, L.F{., CQLFCQURSC Sl1BCODE ACTUAL, EFFECTIVE HEA7EQ FOdTPRiNT XFpB UNITS 1,000 T07AL AREA: 11{}00 VALUE RATE a.070 4,070.00 EX7RA FEATURE DATA ~ XFOS Qccurrence 3 AIWACT-CODE 1212 SINGCE FAM.RES-IMPROVEMY BUiLDiNG NO 0 8U1LDING_NO D 1991 YEAE2-1991 EFF YEAR BLT 1891 EFF YEAR 9LT NEtGHBORHUC1p 244 VAIL VILLAGE FILE 6 l1NIT_PRIC7E 3581.6 UNfT_PRICE U5£_Ct]DE 1000 KESIDEfVTIAL XFpB,.,COVE 340 HYC?R-TU6 G , . SEIN•r BY: 10-23- o ; I 2= 49PM ; EAGtE cOu,7r- 9704764765 r # 4/ 3 10123/00 Eag1e Cqunty Assessor ' ' Rage: 3 12:47PM Propertty Retord Card for Account F2034101 as rnF 0411312040 v$rsion 24000419000 FIELD, LAWRENCE 1. TRllSTEE Account: R034101 Parc,el: 210107211023 ~0 lV9CH0_AS BLVD Cnmpany : Sltus Address: Tat Area: SC1 Q3 0005a6 FC7FtEST RD 4S GFt4VE VILLAGE Acres: VAIL IL, 60007 . 81620 VALUE SUMMARY LEGAL DESCRIP7IO~J (May not be corttplete) v ~Y~ MlCA OVerride 'SU6:VAIL VILLAGE FILING 6 91-K.1 LUT:3 DESC: ~~D 687,500 Q PARCCL D 13K-0546 PG-0571 MAP 01-28-91 9K-0546 14V 'L'~ SFR 1,394.460 0 PG-0572 6EC 01-2491 xFOB zo.aso o ~ ToteF Yalue: 2.102A50 p ~ LAND DATA ~ LAND t]cwrronce i As ABSTl2ACT_CODE 1112 SINGLE FAM_RES.-LANQ LANDSIZE 19922 LAIVq$IZE ~D CO~~ 7054 FQREST ROA4 W NEIGNBOiZHOOp 244 VAIL VILLAGE FILE 6 UNIT 7YPE 4 UNf7 ,T4'PE U3E_CODE 1000 RP-SIOENTlAL ZQNING 9 PS SUPER h1Bki0 2001/AIL CpRE, L.H., Gt~LFCC1 LAND_I~Ip 2S . _ SUE3GC7oE AGTiJII,L EFFEC7iVE HEA7ED FOOTPRINT LAND-L 0_50Q 7OTAI. dREA: 0,54f} , VaLUE RATE 887,500 1,375,000.00 ' E)(TRA FEATURE DATA XFOB Ocwrrenaa 1 C7 CO0E 1212 5INGLE FAAA_RES-IMPROVEMT BUILDING NO 0 BUILDING NO _ fl 1931 YEAfi - 1991 EFF_YEAl BL7 19$1 EFF YEAR '8LT NEIGH80FtHH(?DQ • 244 VAfL V1LL.AGE FILE 6' Ul+IIT_PRICE 3$18 UI11fT PRICE l1SE GOLIE 1000 RESIOENTIAL XFQB CiDQE 410 STEAM SH G SUPER_hEBHD 200 VAIL CORE, L.H_, GOLFCOURSF _ SUBCODE ACTUAL EFFECTIVE HE,ATED FOOTPRINT XFQB_UNITS 2,040 TOTAL AREA: 2.000 VALIIE RATE 8,140 4,070.00 ! EXTRA FEATIlRE DATA XFOB Occurrance 2 ABS7RAC7_CL?DE 1212 51NGL,E FAM.RES.IMPROVEM7 BiIILDING NO 0 BUILDING NO CtEP00 1391 YFAR • 9894 EFF YEAR_BL7 -199-1 EFF YEAR BLT NEIGNB4RH00D 244 VAIL YiLLAGE FIL.E 6 UNIT_PRICE 3561.6 UNIT PRICE USE_COQE 1000 F2ES1DEN71AL XF06 CQDE 340 HY0R-TUB G SllpER NE1ND 200 VAli- CORE, L-H., GOLFCOURSE - ` SUBGt]DE ACTIIAL EFFEC`l7VE HEA7ED Fd07PR1NT XF08 4JN1T5 2.000 ' TQTAL AREA; 2.000 VALIlE RATE 7,600 3.800.00 EXTRA FEATURE DATA xFQB Oacurrence 3 A'~CT_C'~DE '1212 SINGLE FAM.RES-IMPRt3VEMT BUIL[7KNG_Na ~ 0 6UILdiNG_NO 1991 YEAFi - 1991 EFF_YEAR BLT 1891 EFF_YEAR 6LT NEIGHBORHQOD 244 VAIL VILLAGE FILE 6 L1TV1T PRICE d452 UNIT PRIGE USE_COOE 1000 RESIdENTIAL XF08_COOE 310 5PA GOOp SFNT BY: 10-23- 0;10,42AM ; EAGIE CDINTYi 9704764765;# 6/ 6 101'23100 Eagle Caunty Assessor Page: 1 10:36AM Properly RsGOrci Card far Account R039707 as of 08118120q0 Wersian 20000816001 MAHER, JERARD F. & JOAhi S. -l7 Accaunt: R0397U7 Parcel: 210107210013 Camparty : Situs Addreas: ` 251 W1.ER i3D Tax Area: SC1 [I3 000625 FOREST RD F S Acres: VAIL NJ, 7 6 $1557 Ae4, \,t VALUE SUMAAAI2Y L,EGAL DESCRiPTIDM (May nat be connplete) ~ ke Value 6y: - M1GA Urrerride SUB;UAIL'JiL1AGE FILING F $LK:2 ~ U LANd 773,440 U LDT:2 SK-0686 PG-0209 4CD 01 -15-95 ~ Tatsl V81u@: 773,440 d BK-0686 RG-0290 QCD 09-15-96 BK-0686 PG-0291 qCD 01-15-96 r~ I Bx-ossa PG-02e2 OCD 01 -15-96 • SALES [~ATA Recapt N Sale bate aeed V11 Q1U Sale Adj Sale Time RdJ Sale Type FClca Rat1A Rrfce Ratlo Pr1ce Rafio R734381 07-JUL-2000 WD f Q 2,350,000 32.912 2,350,000 32.912 2,356,D60 32,912 LA N b QA7A LAND ilecurrence 9 ABSTRAGT GDDE 100 VACA,NT f2ES LANl7 LANDSIZE 75598 LANaSIZE LANI] CC>DE 7054 FOREST RQA1] W LOGA71t?W_AGJ 75 LUCJITION, A[7J NFIGiIBORNOQD 244 VqIL ViLLAGE FILE fi Pt4Y5ICAL AdJ 75 PHY5ICAL_/IDJ UNIT_TYPE 4 UNIT TYPE USE„CQDE 1000 RE51L)EN71AL SUPER NBHD 200 VA11. COlZE, L_Fi., GQLFCL)URSE . SLIEiGODE ACT'UAt EFFECTIVE HEAfiEp FOCITPRIM1Pf i.ANp_L 1.006 TaTaL a,REA: 1.0170 VAI.UE RATE 773,440 773,440.00 . I ABSTRAGT SllMMARY bvsrr4de Qverrida Cade Clasa1fleation Aetual Valiue Assessed Value AGitual Valur Assessed Vaiu+e tOQ VACAN7 RES LANQ 773,440 224,300 773.440 224,300 Total 773,a40 224,300 77a,44t1 224,300 ~ ~ SEVT BY~ 10-23- 0;10:40AM ; . EAGLE COLm''fY- 9704764785,* 2/ 6 10123I00 Eagle County Assessor Page• 1 10:35AM Praperty Record Card for Account RD095Z6 as af D6l02l20t~~i versian 240[lQ8020i1p . T & L PROPERTIES LLC ' Accvunt: R009526 Parcel: 210107211019 ~ 19 G1NGC-Ft GOV'E RD Ccympany : Sltua Addreas: ~ Tax Arga. SC103 00055fi FQREST RD L LEY Acrea: V,w L ~ 10.88064 81657 ? YALUE S~IMMARY LEGAL DESCRIPT'rOM (May nat be tnrnplete) Value By: MfCA Ovemde CL1ND0: Ht]l1SE IN F[7RESTCONDC] UNIT1 IV %o w LAN0 550,004 Q BK-0512'PC-0806 W012-15-87 . ~ 5 FR 275.450 p X FdB 5.260 p NAe Tatalllalue; 630,740 SALES lIATA Rer.ept # Sale Date Deed YA OIl1 Sale Adj 5ale Ttme Adj SaEe TYpe PrICe RaUV Prlce Ratlo PrIGE Retiv 02tilAN•1997 WD I U 1,400,400 59,33i6 1.404,000 59.338 1,629,600 50v976 09-SEP-1993 wD i ct 645,000 12s.792 saA,oao 12e.7e2 845,000 128.792 LAND DATA, LAND Occurrence 1 ABSTRAC7_GOpE 1112 SiNGLE FAM.REB.-Li1ND L,4NDSIZE 10910 LAN~SSIZE LANp CODE 7054 F{7REST Rd7AD W NElGH130R!-1QOD 244 VAIL VILLAGE FILE 6 UN17_TYPE 4 U~flT' 'fYPE I~.SE_GDOE 1000 RESCQENTIAL ZONING 9PS SllPER_H6H0 200 VAII. CQRE. i..Ff.. GOLFC4 LAND_IND 28 $UgCODE AGTUAL EFFECTIVE HEATED FQOTPRINT U#ND L 0,400 YO7AL AREA: p AOQ 11ALUE FtATE ~ 350,000 -1,375,000.00 ' ~ - EXTRA FE.4TURE OATA xFflH Occurranca 9 ABSTRACT_CODE 1212 SiiVGLE FAM,RES-INIFROVEl4ST BIIiLDING~,NO 1 BL1fLDtNG NO DEPO(} 1981 Y~AR - 198'1 EFF_YE,JIRBL.T 1981 EFF_YEAR BLT NEIGHBOI~FIDOD 244 VAIL VItU#GE F31.,E 6 UF{IT PF~,IC_~ 2162.4 [1NIT PRICE U5E _CODE 1000 REStpEN71AL XFOB CQDE 330 HYQR•TUB A SUPER_N8M0 200 VAIL CARE, L.li_, GOLFCDl7RSE Su8C4oE nc7'UAI. EFFECTfVE HEATE[1 FOOTPRINT JSFOB CJNITS 1.040 ~ TOTAL AREA; 1.000 VALUE RATE 2,130 2j30.e0 , ~XTRA FEAruRE DArn XFOB Dccureence 2 A6STRAGT_G4UE 7212 SIIYGLE F/1M.RES-IMPROVEMT BUILDiMG NO 1 BtJlLDING Nd 4EPoa .1981 YEAR- 1481 EFF_YEAR aLr t981 EFF YEAR BLT NEIGHBORWt2Od 244 VAIL VILLAGE F9i..E 8 UNIT_PRIGE 31$0 Uwrr pRIGE USE GODE 1000 REStCiENTIAL XF08_CODE 110 FfIREPL A. SCJPER-NSHD 200 VAII. CC}RE, L.Fl.. GQLFCOURSE gUBCOdE ACTLIAL EFFECTIVE HEATE[] FOOTPRINT XFOS_UNITS 1.000 7OTAL AREA: 1.0470 VALUE i2ATE ~ 3,134 g,13Q. Qp ~ BUELDING DATA ! sEvz~ BY: i a-2a- o ; i o : 4zaM ; EAGLE couNT~~ 9704764765; * 4/ s 10123100 Eagie Caurrty Assessor paga: 1 10:38AM Property Recoro! Card for Accaunt R009527 as of 4610612040 versicm 20000805009 T & L PROPERTIES L1.C Accourtt: R049527 PBtrcel: 210107211020 19 GiNGER COVE RD ~ . . . Campany : Situs Address: ~ Tax Area; SC1 C33 000556 FC1RE57 R? *68064 L~ Acres: VAII. 81651 ~ VALUE SUMM/4RY LEGAL DESGRIP710N {May not kse cQmp1eE8} ~ Valuo BY: MICA Ovarrlde CONDO: NOUSE IN FOREST CONDO UiVlT:2 LAND 825,000 fl BK-G344 PG-0393 DC 08-78-82 ti SFR 1,65S.13Q 0 J:fi06 16,380 Tota! Value: 2,495,560 p SALE s DATA RaceQk It Ssle Oste []eed V!f Q1U Sale AdJ Sale Tirna Adj Sale T~Pe Price Ratio Pnce Ratio Price Ratio 02-JAN•7937 Wp I qi 3.100,000 80.534 3,100,000 80.534 3,608.400 69.197 LAND DATA J LAND C7ccurrence 1 ~ A637RAGT COOE 1112 SINGLE FAM.RES.-LAND LANUSIZE 28155 IANDSC,ZE I.AND Cf)DE 7054 Ft]REST RCIAa W NEIGhI~LOF2Hpqb 244 VA1L 1fILLAGC FILC 6 UNIT_TYPE 4 Uh11r ?'YpE USE_CODE 1000 RES![7ENTIAL ZONING 9 PS 9UPER FlBFip 200 VAIL COIiE, L.H., GOLFGO LAND_flVp Z S SUBCQDE ACTUAL EFFECTIVE HEATED FOOTPRlHT LPJJd L 0,600 TOTAL AFiEA: Q.600 , . ' VALUE Rp,TE 825,000 1,375,000.00 ~ ~ E3CTRA FEr4,TURE QATA - XFC}8 Oecuerencs 1 IkBSTRACT_COt7E 1292 SINGLE FAM.RES-IMPRdVEMT B171LDfNG_NO 0 BU1LdINC NO DE~'OQ 1981 YEAR= 1981 EFF_YEAR _BLT 1981 EFF_Y~1R_BLY' NEIGHB[DRkC3OD 244 VAfL VILLAGE FILE 6 UNI7_PRlCE 3816 UiWIT PRlGE 115E_COOE 1000 RESIDEMTIAL XFOB_CQQE 720 FIREPL. G. 5UPER N8H[7 240 UAILCORE,'L.H,, GOLFCQEJRSE $UBCODE ACTUAL EFFECTIVE HEATED F007PR1NT XFOB UN1T5 1.000 TOTAL AREA; 1.000 YALUE RA7E 3J50 3,750,aa ) J i E%TRA FEATURE DATA XFqB Occurrance 2 ~ AB$TRACT-C[?i1E 1212 SINGLE FAII.RES-IMPROVEM7 BtJILD114G NO A BUILDING Na ! DEPQO 1981 YEAR . 1984 EFF YEAI~BL7 1961 EFF YEAR BLT I IVEIGNBURHOOD 244 VAIL VILLAGE FILE 6 E1NIT PRICE 108.12 UNIT PFt1CE ~ USE CaDE 1000 RESlaENYIAL XFQB_CODE 440 SAUNA LRGE SUPfR-NBHD . 2DQ VAIL COR€, L.Fl., GOLF'CDURSE sUBCODE AGTIlAL EFFEC7lVE 1{E1THD FdOTPRINT XFOB_UNI75 60.000 TOTAL AREA: 60,900 VALUE RqTE 8,380 108,33 1 ~ EXTRA FEA7URE DATA XFOB Dccurrence 3 1 t ~ ~ MEMORANC}UM ~ TQ; Planning and Environmenial Commissian FRQIVI_ Department of Community Development DATE: October 23, 2000 SUBJECT: A request for a minor subdivision, to allow for the crea#ivn of tvuo legalfy platted lots, lacated at 862 & 923 5outh Frantage Road/ a currently unplatted tract of land located in a part of 5ectian 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the sixth principal meridian and a part of Sections 6& 7, 7ownship 5 Sauth, Range 80 Vlfest of the 5ixth Principal Meridian. Appkicant: The Vail Corporation Planner: George Ruther I. DESCRIPTlC7N OF REQCJEST fihis request does not involve a ehange in zoning; nor is it ira canjunction with a request far development reWisw. There would be na gran# of additional development rights in association with this request. The appi€catian is for the ~ processing and recording of a plat for a tract of land that is currently unplatted. ~ The applicant, The Vail Carporatian, represented by Jonathan W. Greene, is reqruesting a m9nar subdrvision of an unplatted parcel of property. The parcels are located at 862 & 923 South Fron#age Road and are commanly referred tfl as the Vail Mountain Maintenance 5hops and the Holy Crass Lat. The purpase of the minor subdivisiort is to create twa legally platted Iots pursuant to the SubdiWisican Regulations of the Town a# VaiL Since the Town of Vail does not have an exemption ar single 1ot platting procsss established in the Subdivision Regulations, it is necessary for the appficant to plat two tracts of land in order ta compiy with our definition of "subdivision." Pursuant to the Vaol Tawn Cade, a minor subdivision is defined as: "MinQr su6divlsian" shall mean any subdivision containing rrot more than four (4) lots fronfrng on an existing street, not involvrng any new sfreet or road or the extension of Municipal facflrties and rrof adversely affecfing the development of the remar`nder of the parceI or acijoining property.,' Further, a subdivision is defined, in part, as: "A tracf of land which is divid'ed into fwo (2) ar more 1Qts, tracts, parcels, sites, separate inferests (including leasehold interesfs), rnterests in comman, or ofher diwision for the purpose, whether immediate or future, of trarasfer of owvnershrp, or for building or other development, or for street use by reference to such sufidivision or recar'ded plat fher'eaf." ~ . ~ IL STAFF RECCIMMENDATIC3N ~ The Community Develapment Department recornmends approval of the proposed minor ~ subdivision sUbject to fhe following fincEings: 1. That the applica#ion is in campliatace with the intent ant1 purposes of the Subdivi5ion Regulations, th+e Zoning C.3rdinance and ather pertinent regulations that the Planning and Environmental Commission deerns applicable. 2. That the appGcation is appropriate in regard to Town paficies relating to subdiuision controi, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutoons and other applicable clocuments, environmental integrity and compatibility with the surrounding land uses and other applicable documents, and effects on the aesthetics of the Town- The Cornmunity DevElopment Department alsa recommends the fioilouving canditions of apprcavaL 1. The applican# will record the approved and signed plat with the Eagle County Clerk and Reeorder's Office by no later than October 23, 2001, or prior to the subrnittai of any applicatians for developrroent review on the praperty, which ever comes first. 2. That the appficant takes immediate steps to clean up the site: which includes the removal of abandtaned vehicles, trash, debris, etc. The applicant shall also take steps to prevent surface drainage and erosion frorn reaching Red Sandstane ' Creek. The clean and erosivn wor}c shall be compieted prior to Naaember 15, ~ 2000. An inspectian by the Cpmrnunity Development Department is required upon completion_ Ili. ZQNING According to the Cffficial Town of Vail Zoning Map, the appficant's property is zoned Lionshead Mixed-Use II. The applicant is nat prQposing to change the existing zoning on the peoperty. Any future deWelapmen# praRasal vr change in use wauld require the review and consideration of the Town af VaiL The fa9lowring is a synposis of the land use regulations: The Lionshead Mixed Use 2 Distriet is intended to pravide sites for a mixture of multiple- famiiy clwelGngs, iadges, hotels, fractional fee cCubs, time shares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, Iight industriai activities, and commercial establishments in a clustered, unified develaprnent. Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, is in#ended to ertsure adequate Iight, air, open space arrd other amenities appropriate to the permitied types af buiidings and uses and to maintain the desirab6e qualities af the Dis#hct by establishing appropriate site development sfandards. This Distriet is meant to encaurage and provide incentives for redeveiopment in accDrdance with the Lianshead Redevelopment Master Plan. This Zone District was specifically developed to provide incentives for praperkies to ~ redevelop. The ultimate gaal of these incentives is to create an economically viforant ~ lodging, housing, and commercial core area. The incentives 9n this Zone District include Fncreases in allowable gross residential floor area, building heigh#, and density nver the 2 r ~ - ~ previously established zoning in the Lianshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. ~ The primary goal of the incentives is to create economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment consistent with the Lior,shead Redevelopment Master Plan. AdditianalVy, the incentives are created to help finance public, aff-site, impravements adjacent ta redeveiopment projects. Public amenities which wiil be evaluated w%th redevelopment proposals taking advantage of the incen#ives crea#ed herein may 'rnclude: streetscape improvements: pedestrian/bicycle access, public plaza redeveEopment, public art, roadway impraWemants, and similar improvements- (Qrd. 3(1999) § 2) 12-71-2: PERMITTED AhJD CONDCTIONAL USES; BASEMENT OR GARDEN LEVEL: A. Definition: The "basernent°" or "garden level" shail be defined as that flaor of a building that is entirely or substantially below grade. B. Permitted Uses: The folfouving uses shalh tae permitted in basemen# or gardert fevels wi#hin a structure: Banics and financial institutions. Commercial ski storage. Eating and drinking establishments. Personal services and repaEr shops. Prafessionai offices, business offices and studias. Public ar privats lockers and stor~age. Recreation facilities. RetaiE establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier senrices, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additianai uses determined ta be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 af this Title. r C. Conditianal Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garrfen ~ Bevels withsn a s#ruClure, subject to issuance of a conditionai use permit in accordance with fhe provisions af Chapter 16 af this Title: Conference facilities and meeting rooms_ Liquor stores. Lodges and accammodation units. Major arcade. MuRtiple-famify residential dwelling units, time-share units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee hvusing units (Type II{ (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and 7ype IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of ' this Title}. Radio, TV stares, and repair shops. Theaters. Additianal uses deterrnined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions af 5ectian 12-3-4 of #his Ti#Ie. (prd. 3(1999) § 2) 12-7E-3: PERMITTED AND GaNDITIQNAL USES; FIRST FLOOR OR STREET LEVEL: A, Definition: The "first floor" or'°street IeueP' shall be defined as that floar of the building that is lacated at grade or street lewel along a pedestrianway. B. Perrnitted Uses: The following uses shal) be perrnitted an the first floor or street level within a structure. Banks, with walk-up #eller facilities. Eating and drinking estaafishments, I Recreation faciCities. ~ Retail stores and establishments, Skier t3cketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. 3 ~ ~ Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the pravisians of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Canditianal Uses: The follawing uses shall be permifted on the first floor or street ~ level fioor within a structure, subject to issuance of a canditional use permit iri accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 a# this Title: Barbershops, beauty shaps and beauty parlors. Conference facilities and meeting rvoms. FinanciaE institutions, other than banks. Liquor stares. Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residentiaV dwel'ling units, time-share units, frac}ianal fee cJubs, bdge dweUing units, and emplflyee housang units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHLJ) as pravided in Sectinn 12-13-7 of this Title}. , Radia, TV stares, and repair shops. Additioraal uses determined to be similar to condidianal uses descrRbed in this subsectian, in accordance with the provisions of Sectian 12-3-4 of this Title. (Ord. 3(1999) § 2) 12-71-4: PERMlTTEQ AND CQNDITIONAL USES; SECOND FLDOR AND A84VE: A. Permitted L1ses; Exception: The followir?g usES shall be perrnitted an #hose floors above the first floor within a structure: Lodges and accommodatian units. Muftiple-family residential dwelling units, lodge dwelling units, and empfoyee housing ungts (Type all (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 4f this Tifle). ~ Additional uses deterrnined ta be similar to permi#ted uses described in this subsectiora, in accordance wiih the provisions of Sectron 12-3-4 of thts Title. B. Canditionai Uses: The follawing uses shall be permitted on second #Iflors and h'rgher aboue grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Banks and financiai institutions. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Eating and drinking estabfishments. Liquar stores. Persanal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business afFices and studios. Radio, TV stares, and repair shops. Recrea#ian 4aciii#ies. Retail establishments. S#cier ticketing, ski schoai, skier servicss, and daycare. Theaters. Time-share units and fractianal fee clubs. Additional uses determined to be simtlar ta conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with ttte prnvisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. (Ord. 3(1999) § 2) 12-71-5: CC7NDkT101VAL USES; GENERALLY (ON ALL LEVELS OF A BUILaING OR OUTSIDE OF A BUILDlNG): ' The following conditEOnal uses shall be permitted, subject ta issuance of a conditional ~ use permit in accordance with the provisions o# Chapter 16 of #his Title: . Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 12-14-18 of this Title. ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ Brew pubs. Coin-operated laundries. ~ Commercial storage. Gasaiirte and service stations. Private outdoor recreation faeiiities, as a primary use. Public burldings, grounds, and faciiities. Pukalic or private parking lots_ Public parfc and recrea#ion facilities. Public utility and public service uses. Ski lifts and tows. Television stations. Vehicle maintenance, service, repair, storage, and fueling. Warehousing. AdditionaV uses determined to be similar to conditional uses deseribed in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of thi5 Title. (Ord. 3(1999) § 2} 12-71-6: ACCESSORY USES: The follawing accessory uses sha11 be perrnitted in the Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accardance with the provissons of Section 12-14-12 af this Title. Loading and delivery and parking facilities customarily incidental and accessory to permitted and conditional uses. Minar arcade. Offices, Inbbies, lauradry, and other facilities customarily incidental and accessQry to hatels, ladges, and multiple-family uses. ~ Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunction vwith permitted eating and drinking ~ establishments. Swimming pools, terani$ courts, patios or other recreation facilities customariiy incidental to permitted residential or lodge uses. C}ther uses custamarily incidentai and access4ry to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the aperation thereaf. (Ord. 3(1999) § 2) 12-71-8: CQMPL3ANCE BURDEN: I# shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence before the Planning and Enaironmentai Commission and the Design Review Board fhat th@ propased exterior alteration or new development is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 2 DEStrict„ that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelapment Master Plan and that fhe propo5at d4es not otherwise haue a signific,ant negative affecf on the character af the neighborhood, and #hat the proposal subs#antially complies with ather applicable elernents of the Vai{ Comprehensive Plan. (Ord. 3(1999) § 2) 12-71-9: LUT AREA AND SITE DiMENSaQNS: The mini?num lat or site area sha41 be ten thausand (10,000) square feet af buildable area. (prd. 3(1999) § 2} 12-71-1 D: SETBACKS: The minimum bcailding setbacks shall be ten feet (10`) unless atherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevefopment Master Pfan as a build-to 1ine. (Orct. 3(1999) § 2) ~ 12-71-11: HEIGHT ANa BULK: ~ Buildings shail have a maximum average building height of seventy one feet (71) with a maximum height of 82.5 feetS as fuRher defined by the Lionshead RedeveEopm+ent 5 Master Plan. AU development shall camply with tFre design guidelines and standards founcf in the Lionshead Redeve[opment Master Plan. Flexibility with thE standard, as incorporated in the Lianshead Redevefopment Master Plan, shall be afforded to ~ redevelopment projec#s which meet the intent of design guidelines, as reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. (Ord. 3(1999) § 2) 12-71-12: DENSITY (DVIIELLING UNITS PER AGRE): Up to a thirty three percant (33%) inerease over the existing number of dwelling units an aproper#y or thirty five (35) dweliing units per acre, whicheuer is greater shall be allowed. Far the purpose af ca(cuiating density, employee housing units, accommodation units, time-share units, and fractional fee club units shall not be counted as dwelling units. Additionaliy, a"lodge dweliing unit", as defined herein, shall be counted as twenty five percent (25%) of a dweliing uNt for the purpase of calculating density. (Qrd. 3{1999} § 2) 12-71-13: GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLQQR AREA (GRFA): Up to two hundred fift[y (250) sc}uare feet of gross residential flaar area shall be allowed for each one hundred (100) square feef af buildable site area, or an increase of thirty three percent (33%) over the existing GRFA round an the preperty, whichever is greater. Nlultiple-family dwelling units in this Zone District shall nnt be entitled ta additional gross residen#ial floor area under the 250 Ordinance, Section 12-15-5 of this Title. (Ord. 3(1999) § 2) 12-71-14: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed seventy percent (70%) of the total sate area, unless ~ otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master P(an. (C)rd. 3(1999} § 2) 12-71-35: LAN[3SCF+PING ANQ SITE DEVELOPMENT: ~ At leas# twenty percen# (20%) of the total site area shafl be landscaped, unless otherwise speci#ied in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. ((]rd. 3(1999) § 2) 12-71-16: PARKING AND LOAQING: Off-street partcing and loading shall be provided in accardance with Chapter 10 of this Ti#Ie. At ieas# one-haff (112) the required parking shall be loca#ed within the main building ar buildings. (Qrci. 3(1993) § 2) 12-71-17; LOCATION OF BUSi'NESS ACTIVITY: A. Limitati+ans; Exception: AIR offices, businesses and senrices permitted by zone distric#, shall be aperated and conducted entirely within a building, except for permitted unenclased parking or laading areas, the outcfoor display of goods, or outdoor restaurant seating. B. Outdoor Displays: The area to be used for outdaor dispkay must be located directly in frnnt af the establishment displaying the goads and entirely upan the estabiishment's own proper#y. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streats shall not be abstructed by outdoor display. (Ord. 3(1999) § 2) 12-71-18: MITIGATION OF DEVELOPNiENT IMPACTS: Property owners/developers shall alsn be responsible for mitigating direct irnpac#s of their developmen# an pubfic infrastructure and in ail cases mitigatian shall bear a reasonable reiation to the devekopment impacts. Impacts may be determined based on ' reparts prepareci by qualified consultarats. The sxtent of mitigatian and public amenity ~ improvements shall be balanced with the goals of redevefapment and wifl be determirted by the Planning and Enaironmental Commission in review mf develapment projeet$ and 6 ~ conditional use permifs. Mitigatian of impacts may include, but is not fimited to, the fallowing: roadv,ray improvements, pedestrian walkway impravemerrts, streetscape ~ improvements, stream traGUbank improvements; public art improvements, and sirnilar improvements. The irt#ent of this Sectian is to only require mitigation far large-scale redevelopmentldevelopment projects which produce substantial afF-site impacts. fV. MIN(3R SUBDIVISIQN REVlEW CRITERIA Qne basic premise of subdivisian regulatians is that the minimum standards for the creation af a new lat must be met. The first set of review criteria ta be considered by the PEC for a minor subdivisian application is as f41lows: A. Lot Area The minimum lot area prescribed in the Lionshead Nfixed Use 2 zone disitrict shall be 10,000 square feet of buildable area. The buifdable area of propased Tract A is approximately 53,840 square feet or 1.236 acres. The buildabie area or proposed Tract 8 is approximately 141,352 square feet or 3.245 acres. Theeefore, the proposed lot sizes camply with the lat area criteria. B. Frontaqe Although there is no minimum frontage requirement in the Lionshead Mixed-Use 2 zone district, the applican# is proposing a combined frontage of approximately 1,091 linear feei for the two xracts of land. C. Site Dimensions ~ Although there are na prescribed srte dimensions in this zane dFStrict, the Ti own Code does require #hat each site c+an#ain at Reast one acre of "buildabEe" (excluding flood plain and red hazard avalanche zones) land. This proposal complies with this reguirement. Site-specific surveys delineating the 100-year filoocf plain ar wetlands wiil be required it/when an application fQr development review has been received for the property. The second set of review criteria to be con5idered with a minor subdivision request ds as outlined in the 5ubdfvision Ftegulations, and is as foliows: The burden af praof shall rest with the applicant tv shaw that fihe appiication is in compEiance with the intended purpvse o# Title 13, Ghapter 4, the zoning ordinance, and vther pertinent reguiations that the P°EC deems applicable. The PEC shall review the application and consider its apprapriateness in regard to Town poficies relating to subdiuision contral, densities proposed, regulati4ns, ordinances and resolutions and other apPlicable documents, effects on the aesthetics af the Towri, enuironrnental integrity and compatibility with surraunding uses. The subdivision purpose statements are as follaws: 1. To inform each subdivider of the standards and critena by which dewelopment ancf proposafs vui(I be evaluated and to provide information as to the type and extent of improvements required. r ~ Staff Response: One purpvse of subdivision regulations, and any development controf, is to estabiish basic ground rules which the staff, the PEC, the applicant and the cornmunity can follow in the public review 7 process. This appiication has been submi#ted according to the ' requirerraents ~)f Chapter 13, Subctiwision Regulatians. 2. Tca provice for the subdivision af property in the future withouf conffict with ~ deveiopment on adjacent property. Staff Response: Adjacent oand uses include 1-70 nght o# way, the Red Sandstone Creek riparian corridor, the west end of the Lionshead Gommercial Core area, a gas station and the wastevuater treatment facifity. The proposed plat does not create any confiict with development an adjacent land. 3. To proteet and consenre the value of land throughout the municipality and the value of buildings and irrEprovemen#s on the land, Staff Response: Since there are no changes to land conditions 4r developrnent standards proposed, staff believes thds praposa9 will not be ctetrimental ta the value of land throughvu# Vaii, nar will it iae detr°smental to the value af land in the immediate area. 4. Ta ensure that subdivisian of praperty is in compliance vvith the Tpwn Zoning Ordinance, to achieve a harmoniaus, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, cansisteni with municipal development objectives. Staff Respanse: The twa parcels under cansideratian are within the baundaries of the Lionshead Redevelopment Mas#er P9an study area. ~ Ac: ording to the master plan, the realignmen# of the South Frontage ~ Road is anticipated. Higher residential densities and buiiding heights in this area may be apprapriate, particularly for employee housing. It is anticipated that the two parcefs could be consolidated in the future tca create a more wvrkable development site. It is likely however, that some portions of the existing service yard would remain an the site (fuel stnrage, snow cat storage, etc.) Staff believes the prvposed plat will not preclude a harrnoniaus, canvenient and warkable rela#ionship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives_ 5. To guide pubiic and private policy and action in arder to provide adequate and efficient #ranspartation, water, sewage, schools, parks, pkaygrounds, recreatianak and other pubiic requirements and facilities and generalCy to provide that public faciiities will have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. Staff Response; This aspec# of the subdivisiQn regufations is intended primarify to address impacts of large-scale subdiuisions of property, as opposed ta this particular minor subdivisiora praposal. Staff does not befieve this proposal wQil have any negative impacts an any of the other abave-listed public #acili#jes. 6. To provide for accurate legal descripiians of newly subdivided land and to establish reasonable and desirable cons#ructian, design stanciards and procedures. ~ StafF Response: This subdivision pla# has been prepared in accordance ~ with the standards prescribed in the Town o# Vail Subdivisian 8 ~ Regulations. Staff finds that the applicant has compiied wi#h the criteria. This goal of the subc#ivision regulations will not be irnpacted by the ~ praposed plat. 7. Ta prevent the pallution of air, strearns, and ponds, ta assure acfequacy of dratnage facilrties, to safeguard the water tabie and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout tf7e municipalrty in order to presenre the integrity, stabifity, ancf beaGty of the comrnunity and the value of fand. Staff Response: Since this proposal does nof invo4ve any construcfian or develapmen#, it will have no impact on these issues. However, a visit to the site by the staff uncovered rrumerous potentiai pollu#ian hazards. Large amoun#s of fill dirt, old construction equipmenf, abandoned uehicies, etc. are stored on the site_ Whike this wauld not be a reason to deny the minor subdirrision request, staff is recommending that the appiicant take immediate steps ta clean up the site. The clean up work should be completed prior to November 15, 2000. I 1 ~ i ' ~ ~ 9 ~ I)csign Wurkshop. Inc. I. aiaidscupc Arr.hilecture ~ Lanci }'lannirag ~ l.?rban ]Jr,sil;n Toairism PlannFng September 25. 2000 donathan W. Greene Assistant DeveIppment Manager Vail Resorts Dcvelopment Co_ , . PC7 13ox 959 Avon, CO S 16Z0-0959 Re: Potential env iron.menial irnpacts of proposeci minor subaivision plan fnr the 5uuth Frontage Road Parcel. Dear Jonathan: ' '1'€,i4 Ietter is in rCgard to the proposcd min0r 5ttbdivision of the South Frontage Road Parcet, currently re£erre.d to as the IIoly Cross parccl arsd the Vail mountain service yard, „ lUCated west of Lionshead on the north side of the south frontage road. it•.,. ()ur analysis afpotential environmenial impacts associated with the proDosed minor subdivision submittal is as follows: le General assessment T}uc to the fact that this minor subdivision subrnittal does not Gonsist of any spcciiic cievelopment applicatian, and does not seek any specitia; zanzng change or development approval, .here are no andicipated environmcntal inlpacts resulting from the propose.d suhmittal. li7 addition, given tkiat this rnincar subr3ivision subinittal does not consist of anv specific devtlopn-ient applacation, anci daes not seek any specitic zaning change or deVeloptnent approvals, there az-e no anticipated addiCional burdens k}n any public infrastructure, such as, but nrat liniited to, sanitary sewer, water, storm drainage, electric:i-,y, r°oadways, clc. Specific assessment Given the above beneralazeci assessrnent, thc following ss a detailed hreakCiovun ofpatential envirocarnental impact issues that could result #rom any given project, and the anticipated impacts that could result from this minor subcfivision praposal. 1. 100 year Floociplain. No anticipated impacts. No part of this site fa(ls ivithin a 100 year floaliplain ar floodway. ~ DESIGNWORKSHOP . r ! li -..1~ F`1l ,7 k -li.. 1'. 1 31- ~ 2. Wetlarid impaets. No z3nticipatcd inlpacts. The propased sutamittal dozs not seek anV d ~ evelopmcnt of any kind within wctlanci areas. 3. Avalanclie hazard. Nca anticipateci irnpacts. The prOpOsed submitttiiP does ¢iot seek any dc,velopment of any kind witkiin avalanclie hazard areas. 4. Rockfall hazarti. No anticipated iixapacts. The currciat "~own o1` V'ail li;zzard mapping itidicates no rockfal] hazards in this area_ 5. Erosion. No anticipated irnpact.s. This property contains no developable areas wiih slopes in excess oi tc:n percent. b. Air pollutaan. No antic.ipated irnpacts. The proposed submittal does not includL any develapment that w•aulc3 create air pollution 4f any kind_ 7. Noise pollution. No anticipated impacts. The proposeci subznittal does nat rnciude anw cieveloprnent ehat would Ureate npise polEution of any kind. S. I.,'ght Pollution. No anticspatc;d impacts. `The proposed s«bmittal does nc~t snclucie airy development lhat would ce°eate 3ight pollutinn of any kind_ 9. Part,cing impacts. Ne, ant;cipated impac:ts. The proposed submitta] does not include any devele,pment that would create any parkinL, or acid to any c:xisting parking. ` 10. Visual itrxpacts. No anticipated impacis. The proposed submittal does not include any proposed above oz below grade development, and there~ore will have no visual impaets on surrounding properties. i l.'I°raffii impacts. No anticipated impacts. The praposed submittal does not include any deue3opment that would create any additional traffic volume on ad}aeent roadways. 11 5ite access. No anticipatcd fmpacts. The proposed submittal ciocs not inclucic: any cieve:lopmcnr th.at would sncreasc ihe cxisiing number af site aciess points anto the proPertS'- 13. Drainage imgacts. No aniicipated impacts. The proposed suhmittal does not include any devclopmcnt that wauld inc.rcasc sur€ace drainage off of the property. 14. Infrastructfire impacts. No anticipated impacts. The proposed submittal does not include any development that WOufd increase the burden on any puhlic infrastructure, such as, but not limited to, sanitary sewcr, water, storni drainage, eleciricity, roadways, etc, Furtherniore, the prqperty in question is currentlv senred by existing sanitary sewer, watcr, electrical, anci gas ini:rastructure. ~ ~ 11,'l 1.<I~f. E::. ~ Concfusion ~ [;iven the above findings, iherc are no anticipateci enviranmental impacts a£any kinc{ associated wtth the poteratial approval af the proposed rninor subciivisioij plan. When and if, at an}r point in the future, this property is considered for an actua] developnlent subrnsttaf, these ertvironrnental faetors wil3 need to t?e re-evaluated and mitigated in lic-,,ht at that proposed development. gs. Ple-ase do not hesitate to contac[ us if you have any questians regarding the above findinp Sincerely, K. Ethan Moore Associate ~ ~ ~ ~ MEINORANDUM ~ TD: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Department of Community Development DATE: October 23, 2000 SUBJECT: A request fflr a conditional use permit, ta allow for the canstruction of a temporary soil cantamination remediatian shed, to be located at 2313 IVorth Frontage Rflad WestlTrac# B, Vail das Schone Subdivision, 1 Sl Filing. ApplIcant: West Vail Texaco, represented by Tom Pyle, Summit Technical Seruiees Planner: Geot'ge Rutherl8iil Gibson i, DESCRIPTIQN OF THE REQl1EST The applRCant, Dick Dil9ing, awner of the West Vail Texaca, represented by Tom Py{e of Summit Technicai Services, is requesting the issuance of a conditional use pefmit to allaw for the canstructian of a temporary soil contamination remediation shed, to be lacated at ' 2313 North Frontage Raad West. The purpose of the ternporary facility is to provide a structure to house contaminated soil remec#iation equipmen#. The equipment will be used ta ~ remove contaminates frnm the soil and grQund water beneath the West Vail Texaca gas sFatian. Ap remediation work will be in accordance with the prQCedures prescribed by the Colarado State C)il Inspection Sectian. The 12' x12' temporary shecf is ia be located in the north west carner of the gas station property within the prescribed building envelope. According to the applicant's representative, the duration of the remediation process will likely be complete within 24 months. C3nee the rernediation is complete the need for the conditional usE permit snall terminate. II. BACKGROUND According to the C7fficial Tawn of Vail Zoning Map, the 1Nest Vaif TexacQ gas s#ation is facated within the Heavy Service zone distric#. The purpose of the Neavy 5ervice zone district is, to provide sites #or au#omotive-oriented uses and for commerciaC service uses which are not appropriate in other commercia[ districts. Because of the nature of the uses permitted and their aperating characteristics, appearance and potential for generating automQ#ive and truck traffic, all uses in the Heavy Service Dis#rict are subject ta the conditional use ,permit procadure. In granting a conditianal use perrnit, the Planning ancE Environmental Commissian or the Town Council may prescribe more restrictive devekopment standards than the standards prescribed for the District in order to protect adjoining uses #rom adverse influences. I There are na uses permitted in the Heavy Service zone district. All uses are eanditional uses ~ 1 ~ 1 requiring the issuance of a conditional use permit. ~ ~ 111. REVIEWlNC BOARD R{JLES The PEC is responsible far evaluating aproposal for; - Gonformanee with developrnent standards of zone disirict - Lot area - Setbacks - Building Height - Deras6ty - GRFA - Si#e coverage - Landscape area - Parking and loading - Mitigation of development irnpacts - Campiiance with the goals and requirements applicable Master Plans The DRB is respansibie for evaluating the DRB praposal far: ~ - Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings ~ - Fitting buirdings into Iandscape - Conffgtrration of building and grading of a site, which respects the tapography - Removal/ Pres ervatio n of trees and native vegetation - Adequate provision fpr snow storage on-site - Acceptability of building materiafs and colars - Acceptability of raof elements, eaves, overhangs, and a#her building forrns - Pravisiar+ of iancEscape and drainage - Provision of fencing, wails, and accessory structures - Circulation and access ta a site, inclucEing parking, and site distances - Locatian and design of satellite dishes - Provisian of autdoor IEghting IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATIQNS Canditional Use Permit ~ ~ 2 ~ I• - ~ The Community Development Department recarrimends approWal of the applicant's ~ requesi for a conditianal use permit to allow fior the construction of a temporary soii contamina#iQn remediation shed, ta be located at 2373 Narth Frontage Road West/Tract B, Uail das Schone Subdivision, Iy` Fifing. The recommendation for approval is based upon the review of the criteria outfined in Section V of this rnemorandurr7_ Specifically, staff finds that the constructian and praposed use of the temporary soil contamination remediation shed complies with the inten# of the Heavy Service zone district and that the use of the facility wil8 not be detrimental t4 the pub{ic health, safeEy, welfare, nor wiil it be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity of the V'Vest Vail Texaco gas statian. fn fact, staff believes it would be irresponsible and de#rimental tQ tha public health, safe#y and welfare to na# permit the remediation of the contaminated sails. If the P6anning & Enviranmental Commission chaoses to approve the reques#, staff recammencis the approval be subjec# to the forlowing find':ngs and conditions: Findintls: 1. Thai the propased location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of Chapter 12-16, Town o# Vail Code and the purposes of the Heavy Service zone district. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be ~ aperated or rrmaintained wiEi not be detrimental to the public healih, safety, or welfare, or ' materiaily injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ~ 3. That the praposed use wil9 corraply with each of the applicabie prouisians of Chapter 12- ~ 16, Tawn of Vafl Code (Conditional Use Permits). Conditions: 1 . That the temporary facility shall be permitted for a maxirnum 24-month period. The applicant shalC entirely remove the faciEity from the site and completely restare the area to existing conditioras by no later than Qctaber 23, 2002. Shourd the dura#ion of the facility be required for a longer period of time, the applicant shail submit a conditional use permit applicatian to the Town of Vail Community Deuelopment Departmeni requesting an extension to the approvai periQCt. I# shall be the responsibility of the applicanf to contact the Deparfinent ta request an inspection of the si#e to ensure cornpliance with this conditian. 2. The temporary facility shall be used anly for the hausing and operatian of necessary sail contarnination remediation equipment. The facility shall not be utilized for accessary storage of gas station rnateriais (oil, tires, engine parts, etc.) V. CpNDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. Relatianshap and impact of the use on derrelopment objectives of the Town. 7he need to install the sail contaminaiion remediation system is a direct result of the ` allawed operation of a gas station on the site. Further, the lagistics o# the clean up ~ 3 effart reqvires that the systern be locafed in close proximity tg the cantaminated site. ~ These two factars contribute to the staff beliet that the installation of the soil ~ contamination remediation systerrt at the West Vail Texaca mee#s the inteni of the zone district and will have a positive impaci on the development abjectives of the Town_ 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distr9bution of p4puiation, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, aCld Dthef F][7bIIC facilities and public facilities needs. Staff believes there will be no negative impacts of this proposal on the above- described cri#eria. 3. Effect upcan traffic, wuith particular reference to cortgestian, automQtiWe and pedestrian safetp and canwenience, tra#fic flaw and control, access, maneuverability, and removat of snaw from the streets and parking areas. 5taff believes there wili be no negative impacts of :his propasal on the abave- descrilaed crfteria. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be Iocated, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Staff does not beiieve that the proposed 12' x 12' struciure wilf have any negative ~ effects upon the criteria of the area. The temporary structure will be substantially ~ screened from the pub6ic view by the existing gas station building and the topagraphy of the surrounding land. The scale and buik of the temporary structure will be less than the scale and bulk of the existing dumpster enclosure already an the site. The structure must be remaved once the contarninants in the s4il have been removed_ Siaff will be recommending ta the Town of Vail Design Review Board that al[ exterior building rnaterials, colors and designs match the existing gas station. ~ ~ 4 f ~ f ~ t\ tr v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - 11Z~,` ~ 1Cr1 ~ . OG. 791 7r U"`'HI E%WE 19rjo - r` ~ X 7 9' ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ . . 1 . MEMORAN[3UM ~ TU: Planning and Enviranmental Commission ~ FROM: Cammunity Development Department DATE: Octakaer 23, 2000 SUBJEGT: A request for a rnajar subdivisFOn to ailow far the subdiaision of Lot 8 inta Lots 8A & 88, Iocated at 1467 Aspen Grove LanelLat 8, Block 2, Lian's Ridge Subdivision Filing 4. Applicant: Robert Selby, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner; Allison Ochs I. DESCRiPTION UF RE+QLJEST Lat Block 2, Lian's Ridge Subcfivision Filing 4, is currently zoned Singie Family ResidentiaE (SFR) and is approximately 3.296 acres. The applicant, Robert SeIby, represented by Braun Associates, Inc., is proposing to re-subdivide Lot S into t,vo lots, Lots 8A and 8B, and an adcfitional open space tract. According #o ihe Town Code a majar subdivision: ~ means any subdivision lnvalvrng more than four (4) lots, or a subdfvision proposal uvithouf all lots havirrg frontage on a public, approved street, or wifh a ~ request to extend Municipal facifities Fn a srgnrficarat manner, ar a propasal whic,h Uvoufd negatively affect the na1ural environment as determiraed under Section 12- 12-2, "Applica6ility`; or r# the prapasal wauld adversefy atfect the deveJopment af #he remainder c?f the parcel or the adjacent property. Because Aspen Grove Lane is nat a pubPic s#reeC, this request is a major subdivision. As a major subdivision, it is subject ta the review process and criteria as outlined in 13-3 of the Subdivision Regulations of the Tpwn Cocle. Section V of thFS merr3o summarizes this pracess. The applicant recei+red F'lanning and Environmental Commission approval for the Preliminary Plat at the September 25, 2000 meeting. ll. STAFF REC4MMENDAT'ION The Community Development Department recommends apprar?ai of the proposed rnajar subdivision subject to the foliowing findings: 1. That the application is in compliance with the intent and purposes of the Major Subdivision Chapter, the Zoning Ordinance and other pertinent reguiatians that the Planning and Enviranmentai Commission deems appficable. ~ 2. Tha# the application Es appropriate in regard ta Town poficies relatirrg to • subdivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other applicable docurnents, environmental integrity and compatibility with the surrounding land uses and other applicable ~ documents, and effects on fhe aesthetics of the Town. ~ The Community Development Department alsa recommends the folEowing conditions: 1. That the applkcant will revegetate any site disturbance in conjunction with the ctriveway with natural and native vegetation, to iraclude Mountain Mahoagony, Snawberry, SeWiceberry, Buc3cbrush, etc., at the #ime of constructian. 2. That the applicant will reGord the approved and signed piat with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office by October 23, 2001. EII. BACKGROUND Liort's Ridge Subdivision Filing 4 was originaliy subclivided in Eagie County in 1980 and rezoraed frrrrt Resaurce to Residential Suburban Low L7ensity. L.€nn's Ridge Subdivision Filing 4 was then annexed into the Town of Vail in 1987, at which point it was zoned Single Farn3ly R€:sidenfiaf (SFR), At the origiraal subdrvision for Lian's Ridge Subdivision Fifing 4, extensive studies were done in accordance with the subdiuision regulations of Eagle County_ 'W'hi{e #his Fs considered a major subdivision because the l4ts lack frontage on a public road, because this is a resuhdivision af an existing platted lat, some of the submittai requirements have been waived. Please refer to the legal file on the original Lian's Ridge Subdivision for additional inforrnatian. ~ 1V. ZONiNG AIVALYSIS ~ Standard Existinq Lot 8_ Proqosed Lot SA Proposed.Lot 8B Lot Size 143,573.8 sq. ft. 60,243.5 sq_ ft. 60,243.5 sq. f#. Density 1 du + 1 EHU* 1 du + 1 EHU* 1 cfu + 1 EHU* GRFA 16,653 sq. ft. 8,324 sq. fii. 8,324 sq. #t. Site Coverage*#(20°Jo) 21,529 sq. ft. 12,04$.7 sq. ft. 12,048.7 sq. ft. (15%) 28,706 sq. fit, 9,(]36.5 sq. ft. 9,038.5 sq. ft. 'subject Co the issuance of a conditional use permit si#e COVeo'age is redUCed t0 15°,1a if the footprint of the building is Iocated on slapes ? 30% V. REVIEW PROCESS FQR A MAJOR SUBDIVISIflN Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, of the Town of Vail Nlunicipal Code establishes #he review process and criteria for a major subdivisian propflsed in the Town af Vail. Pursuant to Chapter 13-3 (Major Subdivision) of the Town Code, the first step in the review process is for the applicant to meet with a Town Plarner to discuss the preiiminary pian. Staff has met with the appiicant an several occasions to discuss the propcsal and address submittal requirements. Staff feels the applicant has successfuliy ' complied wi#h the initial step in the review process. ~ 2 k' The Towrt of Vail is required to natify the fiollowing agencies that a major subdivision is ~ proposed and that preliminary plans are available for review: ~ a. Department of Public lNorks, b. Tawn Fire Qepartment. c. Town Police Department. d. Public Serviee Cornparry of Calorada. e. Holy Cross E3ectric Association. f. U.S. West g. CableVision company serving the area. h. Nationai Forest Service. i. Eagle River Water and Sanitation Districi. j. Vail Recreation District. k. Eagle County Ambulance District. L C)ther in#erested agencies when applicable. Ai[ of the above agencies have been notified. iUo respanses have been received. The next step in the review pracess shall be a formal cansideratian of the preliminary plan by the Tawn of Vail Planning and Environmental Cammissian. The appficant shall malce a presentati4n to the Planning and Env9ronmental Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting. The presentation and public hearing shall be in accardance with Section 12-3-6 of the Tawn Code. The applicant's appearanee before the Planning and Enviranmental Commission on September 25, 2000 served to meet the pubric hearing and presentation requirement. ~ The burden of proof that the appiication is in compliance with the intent and purposes of ~ the Zoning Code and other pertinent reguiations shall lie upon the applicant. In reviewing the preliminary plan, the Planning and Enviranmental Commission shalE review the application and consider its appropriateness in regard to Town policies relating tfl: 1. Subdivision Contra(; 2. Densities propased; 3. Regulatians; 4. Ordinances, resoEutians and ather appiicable doeumen#s, 5. Environmental Integrixy; 6. Compatibiiity with surrounding land uses; and 7. Effects upon ihe aesthetics of the Tawn and surrounding land uses. . The Planning and Environmental Commission shall have twenty-one days from the date of the review af the preliminary plan to approve, disapprove or approve with conditions flr modi#ications, the major subdivision request. Within ten days ofi making a decisian on the request, the staff shall farward the F'lanning and Envirorarnen#al Commissian's decisaon ta the Vail Tflwn Cauncil. The Counc'ri may appeal the Planning and Environrnenial CommissiQn's actian. The appeal must be placed within seventeen days af Planning ancf Environmental Carnmission's actiorr. 1f the Cauncii appeals the Pfanning and Enviranmental Comrnission's action, the Councif shall hear substantially ~ the sarne presentation by the applicant as was heard at the Planning and Environmental ~ Commission public hearing. The Council shall have thirty days to affirnn, reverse, ar affirm with modifications the Planning and Enuironmental Commission decisian. The apQeal hoaring shall be heEd during a regularly scheduled council meeting. 3 The final s#ep in the review process of a major subdiaision request, after Planning and ~ Environmental Commission preliminary plan review, is the re+riew of the final plat. At any ~ time within one year after the Planning and Environmental Commission has taken action on the preliminary plan, a final plat shall be submitted to the Town of Vail Gomrnunity Development Department. The staff shall schedule a final rev9ew of the final piat. The final revieuv shall occur at a regularly scheduled Planning and Environmental Commission pubfic hearing. The review eriteria far a final plat are the sarne as thase used in reviewing the preliminary plan as contained in Section 13-3-4 of fhe Subdivision Regulations. The appiican#'s appearance before the P[anning and €nvironrnental Commission taday shall senre to meet the public hearing and presentation requarement. The Town of Wail has the abiiity to require certain improvernents uwhen approving a rnajor subdivision. The following improvements shail be requEred by the applicant unless otherwise waived by the zoning administrator, Pkanning and EnvironmentaE Gdmmission, or Council: 1. Pawed streets and parking lots; 2. Bicycle and pedestrian path ]inked with the town system and within the subdivision itself; 3. Traffic contrcal signs, signaCs ar devices; 4. Street iights; 5. Landscaping; 8. Water lines and fire hydrants; 7. Sanitary sewer lines; ~ 8. Storm drainage impravements and storm sewers; 9. Bridges and cufverts; ~ 10. Electric lines; 11. Telephone lines; 12. Natural gas lines; 13. Other imprQvements not specifically mentioned above but found necessary by the Town Enginesr due to the nature of the subdivision. VI. MAJQR SUBDIVISION REVIEW CRITERIA Section 13-3 afi the Tawn af Vail Code prouicfes the criteria by which a proposed major subdivisiQn is to be reviewed. Section 13-3-4: Commission Reuiew of Application; Critera states: The burden of provf shald rest with the applicant to show fhat the applrcation is in camplianee wr`th the intent and purposes of rhis Chapter, t,he Zoning Ordlnance and other pertinent regulations that the Planning arrd Environmental Commission deems applicable. Due consrderation shall be given fo the recammendations made by pu6lre agencies, utilrty companies and other agencies consulted under subsection 13-3-3C above. The Planning and EnvFrQnmental Commission shall review the application and corrsr'der its apprapriafeRess frr regard t0 7own policies relatr'rrg to subdivisiarr corrtral, densifies propased, regulatiorrs, orclinances and resalutians and other appJicable dacurnents, environrnenfal integrity and cornpattbrlrty with fhe surrounding land uses and other applicable documents, effects on the aesthetics nf the Tawn. ' ~ 4 ~ 1. Suhdivision Controi ~ According to Section 12-68-5: Lot Area and Site Dimensions: The miraimu,m lot ar site area shall be CweJve fhousand five hundred (12;504) square feet of buildable area. Each srfe sha[l have a minimurrr frontage of thirty feet (30). Each site shal1 be of a size and shape capable of errclosing a square area eighty feet (80') Qn each side within ifs boundaries. The proposed lots are 60,243.5 sg. ft_ Lot SA has 23,157 sq, ft, of buildable area, vuhile La# 8B has 30,823 sq. ft. of buildable area. Each lot can enc9ose an square 80 ft. by 80 ft. The appficart# has received a variance from the minimum 30 ft frontage requirement. 2, Densities Proposed Currentiy, Lot 8 is zoned Single Family Resodential (SFR). Lots 8A and 8B are praposed ta remain SFR. According to Section 12-68-8, "not more than one dwellirog unit shall be perm"rtted an each site_" The praposed subdiv9sion of Lot 8 would allaw for one sangle-fam`sly elwelling unit on each 4at, far a tatal of 2 dwelling units. In addition, each unit coukd corestruct an Ernpiayee Housing Unit, in aecordanc2 with Section 12-13 af the Town Code_ EHlls are a conciitioraaE use in the SingleAFamily Residential Zone Dis#rict. While EHUs do not count as density, ' they do have an effect on required access to the units (see below), The Land Use Plan cEesignates this lot as IUledsum Density Residentiaf, which allaws #rr ~ densifies ranging from 3 to 14 dwelling units per buildable acre. 3. Requlations ZonFng Cc?de The pudpose of the Sfngle-Family Residential Zane District (12-613-1) is stated as fQI IQws: The Sirrgle-Family Residenflal £7istrict is iRtendecf to pravide sites for law density single-fartaily residential uses, together wrth such public facr`lities as may 6e apprapriately lacafed in the same disfrict. The Single-Family Residential Qistrict 1s irrtended to ensure adequafe lrght, air, prrvacy and operr space for each dwelling, commensurate with srngle-family occupancy, arrd to maintain the desira6le resrdential qualfties of such sites by establishing appropriate site development standards. Refer to 5ection IU of this memorandum for the zoning analysis. Devefopment Standards The Purpase of the Development Standards is stafed as faflows: !t 1s the purpose of these rules, regulatr'ons, and standards to ensure the general health, safefy and welfare of the communify. These rules, regulatrons, and standards are intended to ensure safe and efficrenf ~ deveJopmerrt withr'n the Town of Varl #or pedestrlans, vehicular traffr'c, emergency response tratfrc, aRd the cammunity at large. The Development Standards wrll hefp protect property vaJues, ensure the 5 i I I aesthetic quality of the communrty and ensure adequate development of ~ property within the Town of Vail. ~ While most of the Developrraent Standards apply to the actual cons#ruction of new units, the subdivision rnust also conform to the standards imposed. Section 3; RBSlC'IE17flaI ACCESS, Driueway arad Parkrng Standards specifies starrdards for driveways and #eeder roads. According to the Qevelopment Standards, a driveway must be a minirnurn of 12 #t. wide to serve up to 3 units. The requirement fior 4 units is a driveway of a minimum of 20 ft. However, should the awreers choase na# to cons#ruct EHEJs an both Eots, all that wifl be required to actuaiiy construc± is a 12 ft, wide driveway. As requested by #he Planning and Enviranmental Commissian, the appl'rcaret has pravided a pull-out area for passing cars. In addition, the appEicant wiil provide a fire truck turnaround area. The Fire ~ Departmen# will be requiring fire hydrant(s). All ather Development Standards have beer+ reviewed by the Public Warks Department_ 4. +brdinances, resalutions and other applicabfe documents In reviewing this proposal, staff relied upon the Tawn Code, the restrictions recorded on the p12t, and the Vail Land Use Plan. The issues relating to the Town Code have heen addressed previQUSiy. The VaiE Land Use Plan contains goaEs which staff considers to be applicable to the ma;or subdiuision request. The applicabfe goals include: 1.0 General GrowthJDevelopment ~ 1.1 Vail shouid ccntinue to grow in a controlied environment, maintaining a balance between residen#ial, corrrmercial and recraational uses to serve both the i visi#ar and the permanent resident. ~ I 1.2 The quali#y of the enrrironment including air, water and other natural resources shauld be protec#ed as #he Town graws. 1.3 The quality of development shouid be maintained and upgraded wheneuer possibie, 1.6 Develapment proposals on the hillsides should be eualuated on a case by case basis. Limiied deWeloprnent may be permitted for same Icaw intensity uses in areas that are not highiy visible from the Valley floor. New prolects should be carefuily controlied and developed with sensiti+rity to #he environment. 1.7 New suhdi+risiQns should not be permitted in high geologic hazard areas. 1.12 Vail shoulcf accommodate rnast af the additional growth 'rn existirag developed areas (infilf areas). 5.4 Residential 5.1 Additiana9 residential growth should continue to occur primari6y in existing, ~ pdatted areas and as appropriate in nevv areas where high hazards do not exist. 6 ~ I ~ 5.3 Affardable employee hausing should be made available thr4ugh private ~ efforts, assisted by limited Encentives, pravided by the Town of Vail with appropriate restrictions. 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the marketplace demands for a full range of housing types. The Vail Land Use Plan iden#ifies this neighborhaod as fVledium Density Residential. According to the Land Use Plart: The medium derrsitjr residential category includes hausing wfrich would typically be desr'gned as attached units with common walls. C7ensities Irt this categary would rarrge frarn 3ta 14 dwellfng units per 6ur`Idable acre. Additional Pypes of uses in rhis category would include private recreation facilities, prrvate parking factlities and institutional/publlc uses such as parks and open space, churches, and fire sfatians. 5. Environrnentai Inteqrity In a report dated ,luly 17, 2000, CoElins and Associates reviewed #he geologic hazards on Lot 8. To summarize, the prapased building envei4pes are Iocated within the Medium-Severity Rackfall Zone. The report indicates that "nomial" ; mitigation wiil be required at the construction of units wi#hin the building ~ envelapes. "Normal" mitigation includes raised and strengthened foundations, ~ limited openings an the uphill side of structures, berms ar rQCk walas, landscape grading, structure orientation, etc. An Environmental Impact Report was required for the original subdivision and is on fiie with the GQmmunity Developrnent Department. The applicant has completed a new Environmental Impact Repor# which is attached for reference. 6. Gompatibility with Surrounding Land Uses ~ The surrounding residentiai lots are zoned Single-Family Residential. Tract A is ~ zoned Natural Area Preservation. Staff has completed an analysis ofi all af the lots in Lion's Ridge Subd`rvisian Filing 4for comparison to the proposed subdivision #or Lot 8. The analysis provides the foilowing: Lot Lat Size (acres) Zonina Allowable GRFA (sq. ft.) Bloek 1 1 ,36 SFR 3,868 2 .36 S'FR 3,868 3 .772 SFR 5,663 4 .509 SFR 4,512 5 .499 SFR 4,474 6 .727 SFR 5,467 BRoek 2 , 1 .5$7 SFR 4,$57 2 .474 SFR 4,365 M 3 .413 SFR 4,099 ~ 4 .397 SFR 4,029 7 ~ Lot Lat Size (acres Zoninq Allowabie GRFA (sq. ft,) 5 .472 SFR 4,356 ~ 6 .479 SFR 4,387 7 _545 SFR 4,674 8 3.295 SIFR 16,653 current 8A 1.383 SFR 8,324 proposeti 8B 1.383 SFR 8,324 proposed ~ 9 .598 SFR 4,905 10 .392 SFR 4,(}09 11 1.543 SFR 9,021 Average Lot Size foT Block 1: .538 Average Lat size for Block 2: ,59 7. Effects Uqan the Aesthetics of the Tawn and Surroundinq Land lJses As with all new construction, any appiication for development on the prvposed fots wiil be reviewed by the Design Fieview Board. The review wil] include a fimits of disturbance, associated lighting, coiors, grading, etc. The proposed building enveiopes are sited to minimize site disturbance and the propased driueway will meet the minimum required width for the number of units actually eonstructed. Staff has recommended a conditian of approval which states that all disturbed areas, in conjunction with the driveway, will be revegetated with natural and native vegetation. ~ ~ I , i ~ 8 4 S._ 2 I I ~ 3 4 I ~^C1 g'~ W ?v y i i i 3 5 ~ I I I i e ~ A x { 4~~ 4 ~ _ I I ~ I &r ~ a g - 4 t ~k~ S~~ 4 "b ~4 ]~•',f 3- I bl,- t,.~] ~ r y~T~ ` • ' .e3~ .ti-.: s ' r ~ ! P'~ ~ a A3g•tl ~ r~ ^~kf lF N--z lsP~ g g a 3 3, i ~ y ~ a3 eri# A&- ~ ~ac ~ ~ ~i. ~j I ! ~ ~ .....a..................~-...~...~,.~. ':T T.t •t ' ~ 0 F' ~kTa { ~ ~ ~bti~~ ~ • 1 ~_•r c~ ~ ( ~d ~ ~ir iK i a\ ta ~ j L~j ,~i~ ~ ~ , ,a/' . ~ ~ ~ . ~ o .•{I IL'" .i5 1~k fM1 ~ ~h '24, ~ l ~~r h r: . .ym =-~.~P....~...~...._.+.. ...~7~..+ . v+~y Zi S ~ . ~mv~we~we . . . . . _+a ,wr^rr.~ro~...m~vewal~wt.u~a~yoq.ra.v!e~~v.~[rx,Hawem -~memnt+ma~var.mn.~fnx5vmm.~efv ~ ^ . PLANNING ANa EN'VIRONMENTAL COiV1MESSiON ~ October 23, 2(]00 Nlinutes NiEMBERS PRESENT: MENIBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESElVT: Gaien Aasland John 5ehofieid Russ Forrest Chas @emhardt Daug Cahill Brent Wilsan Diane Gofden Allison Ochs Brian Doyon Judy Radriguez Tom 1Neber Public Hearinp 2:00 p.m. Galen Aasland cailed the meeting to arder at 2;00 1. A request fvr a variance frorn Section 12-8A-5 of the Uaii Tawn Code ("Lot Area and Site Dimensiarts°) and a request for a mrnor subdivision, to ailaw for #he creation of twa legally platted "Agriculture & Open Space" zaned tracts of land, located af 615 Farest Road / a currently unplatted tract af land Iocated irro the North'/Z of Section 7, Tauvnship 5 Sauth, Range 80 West of the 6`" P M Applicant: The Vail Corporation. Planner: Brent Wilson ~ Art Abplartalp stated that the Town had no jurisdiction to proceed an item #1, the minor subdivisian at 615 Farest Road, sfnce 5 property owners had not been notified. He said the 5 property owners were located on 3 lots, twa of which had been divided. He request comparing his list #a the list provided by the Vail Gaeporation. Brent Wilson stated that if Art was correct, this couldn't move forward, as it would be in vialatian af the Town's notification requirements_ Afex Escanderian asked to rr3ove forward, since we shouldn't call it off basecE on one man's opinion. He said the Town had a list of adjaeen# praper#y vwners . Ar# AbplanaEp said he discoWered this at 11am this morning. Galen Aasland saEd it was up fa the PEC ta make sure khis was a+ralid application. Brent Wilson said if these peop6e were nat na#if%ed we cannot mave forward and he said he wvuid call the County fissessor #o verifiy this new information. Galen Aasiarad suggested tabfing this until later to give the applicant a chance do verify the adjacents and he then asked for any audience abjection. There was nn audience objection. Brent Wilsan said he called the Assessor's affice and Art's information was carrect. He said at this point we dar+'t haWe #he authority to move forward. He said the applicant wanted #o table this until November 27I", 2000 in order to re-adverkise to comply with the 15 --day notification requirement ~ Alex Escanderian said the application was complete but the rtotification was missing 5 praperty owners. Planning and Environmerrtal Commission 1 Minutes . October 23, 2000 ~ aiane Golden made a motion to table this until 11/27!{}0 Tom Weber secanded the motian. ~ The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 2. A request for a minar subdiWision of an unpiatted property, formerly known as the Vail 14faurttain Shop Yard artd the Haly Cross Lots in L3onshead, to allow for the final platting to create two #racts, Iccatecf at 862 and 963 S. Frvntage Road WesUUnplatted, Vaii Lionshead 4`h Filing. Applicant: The Vail Corporatian P'anner: Gearge RutherlBrent Wifson ARlison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo and changed the text in Condition #2 to read " in confarmanee with Tftle 5 of the Town Code." Galen Aasland said the applicant shouid not get any additionaf development rights. Allison Ochs said there was no graduated GRFA in this zone disthct. She said it was not necessary tfl restrict the grorrrth there, but there could be a note on the plat. Alex Kiscaderian, with Vail Resorts, said he was ok with a plat note. Tom 1Neber said it should be a condition, not a pfat note. Galen Aasland as€ced if the applicant had any additional comments. Galen Aasland asked di there was any publGC comTrtent. There was no public camment. ~ Diane Golden had no comments. Tom Weber had no cornments. Brian aoyon suggested that ail businesses an the lat comply with Conditian #2. Chas Bernhardt had no comment. Brian Doyon macEe a motion in accordance with the staff inerno, subject #a the findings vuith the added conditions that Condition #2 have text ko read "iro acr.ordance with Ti#le 5 of the Town Code" and a condition be added that there be no additivnai develapment rights granted in con}unction with the minor subdi+risian of this prapeRy. fiam U^Jeber seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vo#e af 5-(}. 3. A reques# far a Canditional Use F'ermit, to allow for the installation of a temporary soil contamination remecEiatian shed, focated at 2313 N. Frontage Rd. West/Tract B, Vail das Sc'hane 15` Filing. Applicant: West Vail Texaco, represented by Dick Dilling Planner: George Ruther/Bill Gibson Bill Gibson gave an overview of the staff mema. ~ Planning and Environmental Gammission 2 Mtnutes Uctaber 23, 2000 r Allison Ochs safd the applicant should be arriving at any mornent. Diane Galden said she had a question about the air being injected inta the atmosphere. ~ Brian Doyon said to bump this ta the end of the agenda ta give #he applrcant time ta arrive, since there were questions about the proposal. Diane Golden asked the applicant if the air ejected in the atmosphere was EPA approve:cf, Tvm Pyfe, from Sumrnifi Services, statett that this was approved by the EPA and there was just a small vdor. Tom V4'eber saiti he had no questions. Brian Doyan askeci abvut the size of the equipment in the shed. 7om Pyie explained that the two pieces of eqLiipment wouCd be housed in a s#andard "Tough Shed." He said the air intake was a louver and the exhaust was out of a vent. Brian Qoyon asked if we were out of cnmpleance with parking for this facility, since two spaces were being taken up for this use. He then asked about the amounx o# noise. Tom Pyle said the noise sounded like a vacuum cleaner and would be muffled. Chas Bemhardt asked if this woUld take 3 years, why was the application for only 2 years. Tam Pyle said 3 years was conservative. Gaien Aasiand asked af a compressor was inside the building. ~ Tom Pyle said it was a bfower, but the naise could be checiced with the noise ordinance. Galen Aasland asked if there was praper natification for this applicatian and said he was in favor of . cieaning up the soil. Brent'Wilson stated that 120 sq. ft. was the trigger that would require a bui[ding permit. Diane Golden made a motian for appraval with the 3 Findings and two canditions, in accordance with the staff merroo. Chas Bernhardt seconded the mation, The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 4. A request for a final review for a major subdivision, to ailow for #he subdivision of Lot 8 inta Lats 8A & 813, located at 7467 Aspen Grove LanelLa# 8, Blocic 2, Lion's Ridge Subd9vision Filing 4. Applicant: Robert 5elby, represented by Braun Assnciates, Inc. Planner: Allison Qchs Allison Ochs gave an averview of the staff memo. Galen Aasiand asked what the process would be shauld the applicant choose t4 builck 4 units. ~ Allison Ochs said if the applicant chose ta build 4 units, the applicant would have to corne back be#ore the PEC for the conditional use permit ar'far a variance on the driveway width. She said staff discourages pla# restrictians. Planning and Enviranmental CQmmission 3 Minutes October 23, 200[} , Galen Aasland asked if the applicant had anything ta add, Gclen Aasland as9ced if there was any public comrrbEnt. Tom Weber said this was ire accardance with the Subdivision Regulations. ~ Brian Dayon agreed with Tam. Chas Bernhardt agreed with Tom. Diane Golden agreed with Torn. Galen Aasland asked to put samethfng in Condition 1 regarding revegetation. Bdan Doyon made a motion for apprvval, in accordance with the staff memo, with the additi4n of text changes to Condition #1 adding "appropdately and where it was significant." Diane Gofden seconded the mation. Tam WebEr said the text ehange was not appropriate and should be worded "appropriate vegetation." Erian Doyan amended the condition to read vegetation to screen the retaining walls. Diane GoIden seconded the amended motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 5. A request far a final review of a conditionai use permit and rezoning, to aflow for the ~ constnaction of Phase I of Danovan Park irnprovements, generally iacated southeast of fhe €ntersec#icrn of Matterhorn Girc9e and the South Frontage Road. P,pplicant: Town of 1Jail Flanner: George Ruther TABLED l1NTIL NOVEIIfiBER 13, 2400 6_ A request for a site coverage variance (Section 12-7A-9) and setback variance (12-7A-6), Vail T6wn Code, to allow fvr a new front entry to the Mauntain Haus, located at 292 E. PVleadow DrivelLot 5, F'art of Tract B, Vail Village 1' Filing. AppEi+cant: Moun#ain Haus, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects Planner: BEII Gibson TABLED Ul'JTiL NOVEMBER 13,2000 Brian Layon made a motion to table items 5& 6 until Navember 13, 2000. Diane Galden seeanded the mation. The motion passeci by a vate mf 5-0. 7. Appravaf af October 9, 2000 minu#es Chas Bernhardt made a motion ta approve the amended minutes. ~ Tom Weber secoreded the mntion. Planning and Enuironmental Cammission 4 Minu#es octoeer 23, 2000 The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. ~ 8. Infarmatian Update Puss Forrest gave an update on the jaint worksessian wi#h the Tawn GounciL 3nan Doyon made a mation to adjourn. diane Galden secanded the motion. The motion passed by a vate of 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 3 p.m. ~ I ~ P!anning and Environrraental Cammission 5 Minutes October 23, 2000