The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-0225 PEC+ ' Y" -- THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY ~ ,~"~ PUBLIC NOTICE "~ k ~` N®TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of k `~ Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on February 25, 2002, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: • • A request far a Conditional Use Permit to allow for an Early Learning Center and a request far development plan review to construct Employee Housing within the Housing Zone District and setting forth details in regards thereto, located at the site known as "Mountain Bell"!an unplatted piece of property, 6ocated at 16Cf N. Frontage Rd./to be platted as Lot 1, Middle Creek subdivision, Applicant: Vail Local Housing Authority, represented by Udell Architects Planner: Allison Ochs A request far a final review of a text amendment to Title 12, Chap#er 3, Administration and Enforcement, of the Vaii Town Code, to establish criteria for consideration for text amendments to the Vail Town Code, Title 12, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther A request for a Major Amendment to Special Development District #35, Austria Haus, to amend an existing condition of approval prohibiting the operation of restaurants within the special development district, and setting forth details in regard thereto, located at 242 E. Meadow Drive/Part of Tract B; Block 5B, Vail Village 1 S~ Filing. Applicant: Johannes Faessler Planner: George Ruther A request for a worksession to discuss planning issues and studies that should be recommended to the Tawn Council for action. Planners Russ Forrest The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's affice, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Corrrnmunity Development Department. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-'hour notification. Please call 479- 2358, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, far information. Community Development Department Published February 8, 2©02 in the Vail Daily. i ~, AWN DF YAfG ~ FEB-11-~c+c+a 09 ~ 54 EAGLE ~1RLLEY ENTERPR T 9E 14C~V~~'~I~I~1 ~~ Receipt Town M Vail, Planning department Legals PEC/i~RBJPIan Legal9 AtiN; Lynn CampelllJudy Rodrigues 75 South Frontage Road VAIL, Ct7 81657 Ad taker; vet Salaspetacxt:. 970 328 6393 P.02~03 ~1~~~~~~ 1001 Grand Avenue sine zot Glenwood Springs, Ct7 81801 Phdne: (566j 850-8937 GU9r~1f; 32100258 000 X502629 ~i~~a~479-2128 Q3/07102 Adif: Phone: [)bats: ClstsslACatfpr~: 0900 oe9criptkxt ` start ~ I Ins. 01 The Vall Dally News 02l08J02 0 1 M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 17.47 17.47 Payment Reference: Creriit Card Holder: r Credit Card Number: 5405 1D70 00805948 Credit Card Eirpiralion: 09/03 Credit Card Veritlcatidn Credit Card VerificaGOn Amt= S:r.~rJ THIS 1TEM MAY AFFECT Y~UI~ ` PRQPEATY 1 PUBLIC N©TIGE NOTICE 4S HEREBY t~IVEN that tFse Planning and Environmental Cammisslon pf the Town of Vail wiA hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12 3-6 of the Municipal C~id9 di the Tvwn of Veil tsn Fcbruary 25, 2002, at 2:t1Q P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal 8uilding. In consideration taf: 1 ~ ~,~j ~, Tofel: 17.x7 Troc 4.40 ~!• ~"~~ t 7 47 >}rspnld: 17.47 Teal tetra O.oo ~y~~~~~ ,~°^ PLANNING AN[] ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION{ ~-' =,.d ~+ PULL{C MEETING SCHEDULE ~'~ Monday, February 25, 2002 IVIEETING CANCELLEQ The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of flail Community Development Department, 7b South Frontage Road. Please call 4fi9-238 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information, Community Development Department Community Development Department Published February 22, 20(12 in the Vail Daily '~" k1 lti ~4WNO1~ VAIL PUBLIC NOTICE PLANNING AN^ ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION TRAINING MEETING Monday, February 25, 2©{}2 PUBLIC WELCOME • LUNCH -- TOV Community Development Dept.l75 South Frontage Road MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT TRAINING MEETING AGENDA 1. Training /Planning Discussion. 2. Policy Issues Discussion. 3. Review of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan 4. Terms I Appointments Discussion. 12;00 pm 12;00 - 3:00 pm The information about the meeting is available far public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office 6ocated at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department `~ ~. ~. .~ ~l~ (JF PAIL 1 Ryales and Responsibilities Oif the Tawn of Vail wards and Staff Revised on July 116, 1999 Purpose: The purpose of this document is la clarify the responsibilities of the Design Review Board, Planning and Environmental ~C'ommission, Town Council and staff on various applications reviewed by these agencies. Summary of genera[ distinctions between tlae DRB and. the PEC on development Applications: Planning and Environmental Commission: The PEC's review of most applications is focused on large-scale issues such as appropriateness of the use, impacts of the development on the development objectives ofthe Town, economic impacts of proposed uses, impacts on neighborhood, traffic impacts, pedestrian access, general environmental impacts, general impacts of bulk and mass on neighboring sites, and the like. The PEC is not responsible for such things as architectural details, roof pitch, materials, facade treatments, landscaping, etc., as this is the responsibility of the DRB. Design Review Board: The DRB's review of applications is focused on only those issues contained in the design guidelines such as ultimate bulk, mass, and articulation of structures, roof pitch, proposed materials, color, landscaping, etc. The DRB is not responsible for issues related to the economics of a developrnent, the proposed use, aff- site traffic impacts, mitigation of development impacts on public infrastructure, etc. The PEC shall: • Ensure plan meets the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations {setbacks, GRFF1,, density, building height, site coverage} ^ Evaluate the impacts of the development on adapted TOV policies {Land use plan, Vail Village Master Plan, Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, Tawn of Vail Streetscape Master Plan) • Evaluate the impacts of a development on the neighborhood, traffic, air and light and general bulls and mass {potential off-site impacts} • Evaluate a development's impact an the natural envir<~nment • Evaluate impact of the proposed use or structure on the community, traffic, etcs The DRB shall: • Review the proposal for compliance with Chapter 11 Design Guidelites, Vail Village Urban Design Considerations, Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan .Architectural Design Guidelines, Streetscape Master Plan • Evaluate site layout and on-site circulation • Evaluate building architecture including detailed bulk and mass review based an desigp guidelines • Evaluate al] structure materials, colors, etc. • Evaluate tree and vegetation impacts and proposed landscape plans • Evacuate grading plans • Evaluate lighting and sianage plans Division of Responsibilities Far Specific Application Types Town CouncillF~C/DRB/Staff ~ Design Review Applicati~rn (DRB o»ly) Planning and Enviranmental Commission: Actfan: The PEC has NQ review autltarlty an a DRB applicatiotz, but must review arty accamparr~vrng PEC applicatia>a as prescribed herein. Design Review Board: .~ctiarr: The DRB is responsible for final apprnvuUdenial of a DRB application.. The DRB is responsible for evaluating the proposal for: - Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings - Fitting buildings into landscape - Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography - Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation - Adequate prevision far snow storage on-site - Acceptability of building materials and colors - Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building farms - Provision of landscape and drainage - Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures - Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances - f.ocation and design of satellite dishes - Provision of outdoor lighting - The design of parks - Compliance with the architectural design guidelines of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, the Vail Village Design Considerations, the Vail Streetscape Master Plan Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plates coatform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with. the design guidelines. Staff may also approve DRB applications of minimal complexity as defined in the Coning Regulations. Town Council: Actions of llRS or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or b_v the Tawn Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the PEC ar DRS erred with approvals ar denials and can uphold, upheld with modifications, or overturn the beard's decision. -2- as- 25~Q proposals 1'lannin~ and Environmental Commission.:. .A'ctior~: The PEC has N4 review authority vn a 250 application.. Design Review Board.: Actiarr: The I3RB is responsible fUr frral rrpprovaUderriai of a 250 application.. The DRB is responsible for evaluating the proposal for: - Compliance with the minimum landscaping and situ development standards required (i.e., landscaping, paved parking, underground utilities, removal of disallowed building materials, compliance with light standards, etc.) - Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings - Fitting buildings into landscape - Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography - Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation - Adequate provision for snow storage on-site - Acceptability of building materials and colors - Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms - Provision of landscape and drainage - Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures - Circulation and access so a site inch~ding parking, and site distances - l.ocacian and design of satellite dishes - Provision of outdoor lighting - The design of parks - Compliance with. the design Guidelines of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, the Vail Village Design Considerations, the Vail Streetscape Master Plan Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements ofthe Zoning Regulations, The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design buidelines. Staff may also approve DR13 applications of minimal complexity as defined in the Zoning Regulations. Town Council: Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Cotlttcil ar by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the PEC or DRB erred with. approvals or denials and can uphold, upl-iold with modifications, or overturn the board's declslon, -3- r~ Conditional Use Pelrmlit (CUP) Drder of Review: Generally, applications writ be reviewed just by the P,~Cfor acceptability of use and ihEn 6y the DRB for compliance cafproposed buildings and site planning, Planning and Environmental Commissions Action: The PEC is responsible fvr fine! approvaUderrial of CUP. 'T'he PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for: I ,Relationship and impact of the use an development objectives of the Town. Z. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flaw and control, access, maneuverability, and rernaval of snow from the streets and parking areas. 4, Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses.. 5. Such ather factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title. Conformance with development standards of zone district - Lat area - Setbacks - Building Height - Density - GRFA - Site coverage - Landscape area - Parking and loading - Mitigation of developrrtent impacts Design Review Board; Activn: The DRB has ND review auilrorify on a CUP, but must review any accomparrying DRB appl icarion. The DRB is responsible for evaluating the DRB prapasal for: - Architectural compatibility with other structures,. the land and surroundings - Fitting buildings into landscape - Canfguratian of building and grading of a site which respects the topography - ltemoval/Preservatian of trees and native vegetation - Adequate provision far snow storage an-site - Acceptability of building materials and colors - Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building farms - Provision of landscape and drainage - Provision of fencing, walls, and accessary structures - Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances - Location and design of satellite dishes - Pravision of outdoor lighting - The desigp of parks -4- Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations, The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation. of the project with respect to the required criteria and fmdings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. Town Council: Actions of DR8 or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or nat the PI;C or DRB erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. -§- ~- Variance C7rder of Review: Generadly, applications will be reviewed~rst by the PEC for impacts ref the prop©sed variance and then by the DRB for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning.. Piannin~ and Environmental Commission: Action: The PLC' is responsible for final apptavaUdenia! a}°a variance. The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for; l .The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal itnterpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this Title without grant of special privilege.. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the propased variance. Design Review Board: Actian: The DRB has lV0 review autharity on a variance, but must revie-v arty accompanying DRB application. The DRB is responsible for evaluating the DRB proposal for: - Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings - Fitting buildings into landscape - Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography - RemovallPreservation of trees and native vegetation - Adequate provision for snow storage on-site - Acceptabslity of building materials and colors - Acceptability ofroof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building fortes - Frovision of landscape and drainage - Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures - Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances - Location and design of satellite dishes - Provision of autdoar lighting - The design of parks Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines- Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation. on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. Town Council: Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether ar not the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn. the board's decision. -6- ~ Major Exterior Alteration (LMiJ-1 and LMU-2) CJrder of Review: Generally, applications ivi116e reviewedfirst 6y the PEC for impacts of use/development and then by the DRB far compliance of proposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission:, Action. The .1'EC is responsible far frna! c~pprovuUdenial of a Major Exterior alteration. The PEC shall review the proposal for; - Conformance with development standards ofzane district - Lot area - Setbacks - Building Height - Density - GRFA - Site coverage - Landscape area - Parking and loading - Mitigation of development impacts - Compliance with the goals and requirements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan (except design guidelines) Design Review Baard: tlction: The DRB has 11`O review uutftorit3~ on a Major Exterior Alteration, but must review any accompanying DRB application. The DRB is responsible far evaluating the proposal for: - Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings - Fitting buildings into landscape - Canf guration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography - RemovaUPreservatian of trees and native vegetation - Adequate provision far snow storage on-site - Acceptability of building materials and colors - Acceptability afroof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building farms - Provision of landscape and drainage - Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures - Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances - Location and design of satellite dishes - Provision of outdoor lighting - Compliance with the architectural design guidelines of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master flan Staff: The staff' is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines, Staffprovides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. 5taffalso facilitates the review process. Town Council: Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Tawn Council. Town. Cvuneii evaluates whether or not the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision.. -7-- «s- Major Exterior Alteration (CC1 and CC2) and Minor Exterior alteration (CC1 and CC2) Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the PEC for impacts of use/development and then by the DR$ for evmpliance of prapvsed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: Activn • The PEC is responsible far final approvaUdeniaf of a 1Vlajvr/Miner Exterior Allerativn. The P1rC shall review the proposal for: - Conformance with development standards of zone district - Lot area - Setbacks - Building Height - Density - GRFA - Site coverage - Landscape area - Parking and loading - Compliance with the goals and requirements of the Vail Village Master Plan, the Streetscape Master Plan, and the Vail Comprehensive Plan - Compliance with th.e Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and hail Village Design Cansiderativns with. respect to the following: - Pedestrianization - Vehicular penetration - Streetscape framework - Street enclosure - Street edge - Building height - Views - Serviceldelivery - Sunshade analysis - The PEC's approval "shall constitute approval of the basic form and location of improvements including siting, building setbacks, height, building, bulk and mass, site improvements and landscaping." I}esiEn Review Board: Activn: The DIZB has NO review aufleority on a Majvr or ~Vlinor Exterior Alteration, but must review airy accompanying DRB applicalvn_ The DRB is responsible for evaluating the proposal. for: - Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings - Fitting buildings into Landscape - Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography - RemovallPreservation of trees and native vegetation - Adequate provision for snow stcsrage on-site - Acceptability of building materials and colors - Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building. forms - Provision of landscape and drainage - Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures - Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances - Location and design of satellite dishes - Provision afoutdoor lighting - Compliance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and design considerations _g_ Staff: "the staff is responsible far ensuring that all sul~rnittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background an the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect. to the required criteria and Endings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. 8taffalsa facilitates the reviev~° process. Town Council: Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the FEC ar DRB erred with approvals ar denims and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn. the board's decision. -9- r.r Special Develflpment District and Major Amendment Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed fast by the PEC for impacts of useldevelapment, then by the DRB for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning, and~na! approval 6y the Town Co urrcil. Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The PEC is advisory to the Town Council. The PEC shall review the proposal for and make a recommendation to the 'Town Council on the following: • Permitted, accessory, and conditional uses • Evaluation of design criteria as follows (as applicable): A. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character,. visual integrity and orientation. B. Relationship; Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. C_ Parking And Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 10 of this Title. D. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and urban design plans. E. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural andr'or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. F. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a fttnetional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. G. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and offf`==site traffic circulation. H. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Workable Plan: Phasing plan ar subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the specia[ development district. - Recommendation on development standards including, lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverages, landscaping and parking Design Review Board: Action: The DRB has NO review Authority orr a SDD proposal, but must review any accompanying DRB application The DRB review of an SDD prior to Town Council approval is purely advisory in nature, The DRB is responsible for evaluating the DRB proposal: - Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings - Fitting buildings into landscape - Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography - RemovallPreservation of trees and native vegetation - Adequate provision for snow storage on-site -10- - Acceptability of building materials and colors - Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and ether building forms - Provision of landscape and drainage - Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures - Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances - Location and design of satellite dishes - Provision of outdoor lighting - Compliance with the architectural design guidelines of the Lianshead Redevelopment Master Plan Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and Endings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. Town Council: ,fiction: The Town Council is responsible for frnal approvaUdereial of an S'D1)_ The 7'awn Council shall review the proposal far the following: • Permitted, accessory, and conditional uses • Evaluation of design criteria as follows (as applicable): A. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. B. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. C. Parking And Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 10 of this Title_ D. Camprelzensive Plan. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town. policies and urban design plans. E_ Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. F. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community, G. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing an and off-site traffic circulation. H. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. I. Workable Plan: Phasing plan ar subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional anal efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. - Approval of development standards including, lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverages, landscaping and parking -11- +~- Special Development District Minor Amendment Staff: Action: The sta~shall review and approve, approve with canditfatzs, ar deny the prop©sal rind then report decision to the PEC. Evaluation of design criteria as follows {as applicable): A. Carnpatibi ity: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. B. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. C. Forking And Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 10 of this Title. D. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and urban design plans, E. Natural andlor Geologic Hazard: ]dentifcation and mitigation of natural andfor geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. ]~'. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality ofthe community. G. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation. H. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function- 1[. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will mauttain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. Design Review Y3oard: .•4ction: The DRB has ND review autlrUrity on Q SDD proposal, brit must review any uccampanyin~ DRB applicattan. The DRB is responsible far evaluating the DRB proposal based on the following: - Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings - Fitting buildings into landscape - Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography - Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation - Adequate provision for snow storage on-site - Acceptability of building materials and colors - Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms - Provision of landscape and drainage - Provision offencing, walls, and accessory structures - Cn-culation and access to a site including parking, and site distances - Location and design of satellite dishes - Provision of outdoor lighting - Compliance with the design Guidelines of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan -12- Planning and Environmental Commission: The PEC is informed of the staff a~,r, ,, aal and may call-up item as it deems necessary. Town Councit: Actions of DRB or P1;C maybe appealed. to the Town Counci] or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether ar not the PEC ar DRB erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, ar overturn the beard's decision. - 1.i - ~- Development Plan (General Use District) order of Review: Generall}; applications will be reviewed first by the PEC for impacts of useldevelapment and then by the DRB far compliance ofproposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The PEC is responsible for~tta! appravaUrlerrial of a development plan in a GU district.. The PEC is responsible for prescribing the fallowing development standards: 1. Lot area and site dimensions. 2. Setbacks. 3. Building height, 4. Density cnntrol. 5. Site coverage. 6. Landscaping and site development. 7. Parking and loading. Design Review Board; Action: The DRB has NO review authority an a development plan in a GU district, but must review arty accompanying I,~RB application. The DR13 is responsible for evaluating the proposal For: - Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings - Fitting buildings into landscape - Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography - RemovaflPreservation of trees and native vegetation - Adequate provision for snow storage an-site - Acceptability of building materials and colors - Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms - Provision of landscape and drainage - Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures - Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances - Location and design of satellite dishes - Provision of outdoor lighting - The design of parks Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and. plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises tare applicant as to compliance with the design guide Ines. Staff provides a staff memo containigrg background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recornnrendatian on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staffalsa facilitates the review process. 'Town Council: Actions of DRB or PIC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Totitim Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the PEC or DRB erred with approvals ar denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. -14- ~ ZoningfRezoning Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The PEC as advisory to the Town Council. The PEC shall review the proposal and make a recommendation. to the Town Council on the compatibility of the proposed zoning with surrounding uses, consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Plans, and impact on the general welfare of the conununity. Design Review Board: Action: The DRB has NO review authority on zoning/rezonings. Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided. The staff advises the applicant as to compliance with the Zoning Regulations, Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. Town Council: Action: The T own Council is responsible for final approvaUdenirrl of a zoran~/rezoning. The Town Council shall review and approve the proposal based on the compatibility of the proposed aon%ng with surrounding uses, consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Plans, and impact on the general welfare of the community. ~ Code Text amendment Planninn and Environmental Commission: .Action: The PEC is c~dvisary to the Town Council. The FEC shall review the proposal for and make a recommendation to the Town Counci] on the compatibility of the proposed text changes far consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Flans and irnpac# on the ;eneral welfare of the community. Design Reviiew Board: Action: The DR& has NO review uut]rority on code amendm~nts- Sta ff; The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal. requirements are provided. The staff advises the applicant as to compliance with the honing Regulations. Staff provides analyses and recommendations to the FEC and Town Counci] on any text proposal. Town Council: Action: The Town Counci! is responsible for final approvulldenial on code amendments. The Town Counci] shall review and approve the proposal based on the compatibility of the proposed text changes for consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Plans and impact on the genera] welfare of the community. file: 11V {I1 LIDATAIEV);R4'ON EIi~C?M'~.M1JIvIC7991PECRCII,ES. DOC -15- To: Vail Town Council From: Bob Mc~aurin Russ Forrest Date: January 31, 2C?172 Subject: Strategic Planning and Critical Actions 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memo is to illustrate several alternative approaches to dealing with the economic issues facing the Town and to also review other strategic issues that may be important #o the Town Council. The Council at its November 15th strategic planning meeting identified creating a sustainable revenue plan for the Town of Vail as a critical goal. A clearer understanding of how Council would like to create this revenue plan is needed. Several options are discussed to illustrate a path for moving forward with an economic plan. Also since the November 15th meeting a variety of development proposals described below are taking shape that will absorb staff and Council time and require a clear framework for decision making. Coming to closure on these issues on February 12t" may not be possible or even recommended. However, developing a direction for the future, defining roles, and developing parameters/criteria for decision making will make the resolution of the following issues more effective in the future 2. OPTIOiNS FOR CREATING A REVENUE PLAN The first major decision is: what are the objectives of creating a revenue or.a business plan? Several potential objectives could include: Determine a vision or a clear picture of where the Town of Vail should be in the future. • Determine the role of the Town of Vail in achieving that Vision. What are our core functions? What do we need to encourage other partners to do? Develop priority areas to invest time and resources. Develop and implement actions (investment & revenue strategy) to create a sustainable economic future for the Town of Vail and its stakeholders. • Provide continuity in decision making over time. There are two basic options to creating an economic plan far the Town of Vail with a variety of hybrid approaches in-between. The first option could be to focus internally on the town government's goals, casts, and revenue streams. The second option is to take a broader look at the town"s economy and develop actions that help ensure the economic prosperity of the resort community as a whole. Option 1: Greate a business clan for the Municnal Government This option involves creating a business plan focused on the Town of Vail municipal government. and developing actions that are within the control {versus the influence) of the town. This option involves getting very clear on what the town's mission is and what our Dore functions include. It could be similar to a traditional business plan that looks at the vision, mission, critical goals, market trends, SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats), actions, and a resource plan (how do we pay for it). The final product could be a clear set of investment and revenue strategies, Potential Considerations: An inward looking business plan that !oaks at municipal goals and includes creating a sustainable revenue plan is very much needed but may not be successful if a broader approach to viewing the future of Vail is not taken first. The community may see this as self-serving if the Council focus appears to be on {even though that may not be the intent) how to simply fund itself into the future without also considering the future economic health of the resort and the community. Option ~ Develoq a Business Plan for the Resort Community If the final outcome of this effort is to work collaboratively with community partners to implement actions that help ensure the economic viability of the community, which the town's budget is directly linked to, then a more comprehensive approach may be needed. This is a very common planning action in other communities. Several examples of what other communities are doing are reviewed below. The basic process involves: ~) Collect critical information to assist in decision making. This information could include: identifying strengths and weaknesses in the resort and community; identifying trends that may impact the community; review customer expectations and our ability to deliver on those expectations; economic impact of day skier versus destination skier; and evaluating what our competition is doing. This information is largely available and could be put together very rapidly. 2} Get clear on a vision or direction for the community. This could involve simply getting regrounded in an existing vision statement or creating a new one. The vision should be based on shared community values, trends tha# may affect the community in the future, and a strong sense of where the community wants to go in the future. The basic tests of a vision is: does it help decision makers make tough. decisions; is it a compelling call to action (does the community believe in it); and can people understand what it looks like to achieve the vision? 3) The next broad steps involve stating goals, developing actions, and a monitoring plan for the implementation of those actions. The final product should be a clear list of actions that have been concluded to be the most effective in achieving the town's economic goals. 4) The Town could then develop an investment and revenue plan that helps implement the community's business plan. If this option were pursued, staff would recommend that a request for proposals be issued to solicit the most creative ideas for developing a community business plan or economic development plan. Potential Considerations There may not be an appetite for a significant public participation process. However, a process could be constructed to develop or get regrounded in the current vision statement irr a three to four week period. Another approach is the Council could work to further refine the existing vision statement, as you are doing, and work with the community informally to ensure there is buy-in and understanding of the vision statement. This will take a strong personal commitment of individual Council members. By creating a community economic plan, the town has a better chance of developing effective partnerships to achieve a successful economic future given that the Town is simply one of many players that can affect Vaii's economic future. 1. EXAMPLES OF CURRENT ECC3NQMIC PRQJECTS The following communities or regions are facing the similar challenge of declining revenue with flat growth in the ski industry- The message that Ford Frick, and other consultants are communicating is that resorts can't depend on skiing like they have in the past. Communities are attempting to redefine their future direction based on both market trends and the values of their community. 1) Breckenridge Breckenridge has gone through various economic related studies. The town engaged Ford Frick to do a retail study. However„ before moving forward with a mare comprehensive economic plan they decided to first clearly articulate a vision statement. They are currently in the process of doing that. 2) Snawmass Snowmass is also evaluating its economic future. This Town took a different approach by creating a variety of alternative visions. For each alternative vision, they are identifying economic implications. Snowmass is also evaluating alternative revenue implications for the Town. Attached is a model Snowmass is using to evaluate the impact of day skiers and destination skiers that may also be interesting. 3} Whistler Whistler has not specifically developed an economic plan but through a vision plan and other comprehensive plans they have developed an economic direction. In its most simplified version, they state that their number one priority in their village core is economic vitality which means having a fun exciting environment. The number one priority in their residential neighborhoods is creating an environment attractive for full time and part time residents. The resort supports the community financially, which in turn provides service employees for the resort. They are also focusing on developing culture and developing a strong focus on environmental duality. 4} Sierra NevadalTahoe Region The Sierra Nevada Business Council in the South Lake Tahoe region has recently received praise for their community and economic planning. After extensive outreach at a regional level the area developed a set of principals which collectively provide a direction for the future. They developed econoric actions that were deemed most effective to stimulate economic vitality that were supported by the community's values. 5} Aspen Aspen has had a very clear direction of creating a community that supports the "mind, body, and spirit." htowever, they are facing flat revenue projections and are taking a community wide approach to their economic planning. Aspen has just initiated an economic planning process and created a partnership between the Town Chamber, the City and the Aspen Institute. They have created an Economic Sustainability Task Force to develop an economic plan for Aspens future. This effort just started in January of this year. 4. OTHER TOPICS FOR COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATEON The other specific strategic and tactical issues acre challenging to consider without a vision or a philosophical agreement about critical priorities for the Town. The topics mentioned next are provided to illus#rate the types of decisions that will be in front of the Town Council in the near future. Developing an overarching philosophical framework for decision making and prioritizing actions for consideration will make the decision making process more productive and effective far the community. 4.1 Development Projects There are potentially 9 major development projects that developers are currently working on for submittal. Together these projects have the potential to result in the renaissance the community has discussed for several years. The most signifcant project is the redevelopment of Vail Resorts properties in Lionshead, which will substantially implement the Lionshead Master Plan. Lionshead The following is a summary of the major components of the Vail resorts proposal to implement the Lionshead Master Plan. West Day Lot: Vail Resorts is Still contemplating the uses on this site. The uses under consideration include fractional fee units, condominiums, and accommodation units. This will be the first phase of Lionshead implementation with construction proposed in 2043. • Holy Cross Lot: Vail Resorts is proposing a new but smaller maintenance facility, a parking structure to replace parking on the North and West Day lot, and a housing project to replace the housing from the Sunbird. This most likely will need to be constructed at the same time as the West Day lot. • The Gondola and Sunbird building site is proposed for ahigh-end hotel that will be the centerpiece of the Lionshead Master plan. This development will include creating new retail areas on the first floor and new streetscape. Underground loading and delivery is proposed which would support. the new retail space and the hotel. • The North Day Lot is proposed by Vail Resorts for a conference facility. Vail Resorts is offering to provide the Sand if the town or some other entity builds and operates the facility. If there is no interest in a conference facility on this site, Vail Resorts will propose another use. The Master Plan identifies this site as a transportation center that includes hotel shuttle traffic, skier drop-off, and loading and delivery. Critical questions the Town Council will need to consider include: • What public improvements should be developed? • How should the public improvements be financed? • Does the Town Council want to consider development of a conference facility on the North Day Lot? Any effort to create a publicly supported conference center on the North Day Lot is a significant investment in time and resources. • Can an alternative plan be developed to accommodate loading and delivery and skier dray-off needs if the North Day Lat is used far an alternative use? A potential alternative to a transportation center on the North Day Lat is increasing capacity far loading and delivery underneath a new hate) at the Gondola site. How does the Town want to deal with the sale of land to private developers when they propose constructing to the build-to line (as apposed to the setback line) as the Lionshead Master Plan proposes? A plan for compensating the Town for land was developed with the Vail 21 proposal which staff could review with the Town Council. Tfae Lionshead Master Plan calls for the creation of 400-500 parking spaces. C)verall shortfall for parking in the Town is approximately 800 to 1000 spaces. Should the proposed VR parking structure on the Holy Cross site include public or employee parking? Should the Town consider building another plate of parking on the Lionshead Parking structure? Then who should pay for additional parking? Each of the above mentioned questions will involve significant consideration. Staff is prepared to provide additional information on each of these issues. They are mentioned here to simply illustrate the decisions that will be needed in the near future from the Town Council, Significant work has already occurred on financing public improvements that can be reviewed with Council (See attached memo). Discussions are needed between the Town and Vail Resorts to effectively resolve the issues mentioned above. ©ther Development Review Projects Qther projects that will create significant opportunities and also challenge the town's development review resources include: 1 } Front Door Project: This will include approximately 1?fractional fee units north of the Lodge Tower, an underground loading and delivery facility, a new skier service yard beside the Vistabahn, a park and underground parking structure on P3&J, and new streetscape. This will be complicated in that Vail Resorts will propose amending multiple master plans and zoning. They have done considerable work with adjacent property owners and their appears to be support from many of those owners. Also the Town will need to consider it's role in potentially supporting or at the very least providing guidance to the ongoing operation of loading and delivery facilities that support the retail areas of Town. 2) Evergreen Hotel: The Evergreen Hotel is proposing to demolish the existing hotel and create a high end 4 star hotel. The ownership would like to make a submittal in the next month. However, staff is encouraging the ownership to continue to work on circulation with the hospital and West Star Bank. This action would also involve a land exchange with the hospital. 3) Hospital Phase II: The hospital is proposing moving forward with the next phase of its redevelopment. The major component of this redevelopment would involve creating access off the Frontage Road on what is now Evergreen property. In exchange the Hospital would convey land to the Evergreen which is to the west of the existing Hospital and is currently a surface lot. 4} Swiss Haus: The Sannenalp contemplates making a submittal in June for redevelopment of the Swiss Haus. Depending on ongoing discussions with the Talisman Condominiums the ,preferred proposal would also create a new retail front on East Meadow Drive. 5) Tivoli: Bab Lazier is proposing to redevelop the Tivoli. This project would be a hotel product. 6} Marriott Building 2: Staff has just received plans for a redevelopment of building number 2. The design wi11 be consistent with the redvelopment of building number 3 which was recently completed. 7} Mountain Bell: This is an active application far a 142 unit affordable rental project. $) Vail Mountain School (VMS}: VMS is currently evaluating several alternative plans to redevelop the school. They plan an meeting with adjacent property owners in the next month and then submitting to the Town. This submittal will most likely involve a rezoning proposal on the tennis courts that were recently purchased lay VMS from the Booth Creek Townhames. The discussion of this rezoning has already resulted in significant concern from several adjacent property owners. 4.2 Other Strategic Tonics A. Housing • Mt. BeIIlMiddle Creek: The developer is working on completing a submittal for PEC review. 142 units are proposed. The developer has applied to the state for Private Activity Bonds, which will allow the use of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. Any significant changes in the program would jeopardize financing approval from the state. Hud Wirth: The town is currently negotiating with Hud Wirth on the acquisition of the 3.2-acre property. The Housing Authority would like to simultaneously develop land on Snowberry (14 acre lot w! 2 acres developable), A-Frame lot on Arosa, and the Hud Wirth property. ERIN&SD is interested in a partnership which could provide additional resources to pay far Hud Wirth in exchange for housing units. • The overall PUD for Berry Creek 5'h was approved by the County Commissioners an February 5, 2002. The Town sold its interest in the land to Eagle County with the condition that the town would control 50°/4 of the affordable housing that would be created an the site. Auerbach Southwest was picked by the town and Eagle County as the developer. Since the developer began working on the site, the area designated for housing has grown to over 30 acres. The developer is working through the County's Planned Unit Development process. It has to be determined haw many units the town would control and how it would control those units now that the acreage has increased to 30 acres. The Housing Authority would Gke to be the town's representative for this development. Commercial Linkage is a housing policy initiative aimed at preventing further deficiencies in employee housing when new jabs are generated. The fawn has a policy of requiring affordable housing units for Special Development Districts, hotels and development in Lionshead. This policy needs to be codified. However, the Tawn has been waiting far the County to begin work on a Commercial Linkage policy, which they have begun. The County (the ToV contributed $5,00© to the $30,000 cost) has retained RRC and the Housing Collaborative to do a rational nexus study (study an haw many employees a particular type of business or development generates). Assuming the County moves forward with this policy initiative, it is strongly recommended that the Town work with the County to jointly create a Commercial Linkage requirement. With regard to Timber Ridge, an agreement has been signed with Mr. Marks to extend the use of Timber Ridge as affordable housing through the ski season. In addition, Mr. Marks participated in a design charette with staff to evaluate various ideas to redevelop the site to achieve his goals and the Town's. This was a productive meeting where an idea was identified which he would like to explore further. We are currently awaiting a response by John Marks on whether he will work with the Town to main#ain employee housing on the site. B. 1-70 NaisefGar~ainq The concept of burying I-70 has been around for some time. In 1993 a developer expressed an interest to bury the Interstate at their cost in exchange far development rights above the Interstate. Mare recently, the ideas were looked at in earnest with the study of the impacts of I-70 with . regards to noise. I-70 runs 10 mites through Vail. Over 25 % of the dwelling units within the Town are over the Federal Highway Administration {FHWA) Standard for noise related to highways. Ta mitigate the problem in the traditional sense would require over 11 miles of sound walls as high as 16 feet. It was discussed that the long-term solution that made sence for Vaii was the consideration of the cut and cover solution. The FHWA and Colorado Department of Transporta#ion are under no requirement to mitigate the impacts of noise from I-70 in Vail due to the fact the majority of the development occurred after the interstate was constructed {19fi9). The next steps in the process include: 1) Discussions with GDOT and FHWA with regards to haw the air right leasing would be negotiated and 2) confirm that the local community wants to pursue this idea, understanding that land created above I-70 will have to be developed by private entities for the project to be a reality. G. West Vail Fire Station. Council has directed staff to acquire the Hud Wirkh property. 1 acre of the 3-acre site, if acquired, would be the site far the West Vail Fire Station. If this site were acquired, Council would need to then determine if they wanted to build and operate a new fire station and haw they would fund it. D. streetscape There is now the opportunity to work with the Water District to implement the streetscape plan in Vail Village. This is a significant opportunity to give the Village a much needed face lift. There is also the need and opportunity to take advantage of Vail Resorts plans to contribute to new streetscape as part of their "Front Door„ project. Further work needs to be done with Eagle River Water and Sanitation District on the phasing and cost of implementing the streetscape plan in Vail Village. E. Dovonan Park Donovan Park went through a public process that extended over 1 year. The major input from community members was to create "quality" facility{s}. The original premise for the pavilion came from Vail Tomorrow, which identified the need for a community gathering space. Further input revealed that a community gathering space that would accommodate 150 to 175 people was needed. In 2000, the Town approved a revision to the Donovan Park Master Plan through a '~ resolution {Resolutions are used to create or amend Master Plans}. This included creating a park and a pavilion in phase 1 and the plan reserved space for an additional facility(s) in phase 2. Specifically a gymnastics facility and a youth program facility were considered for phase•2. On February 5, 2002, the Town Council directed staff to redesign the Pavilion- Also Council members asked to review the purpose of the pavilion. Staff would recommend that: 1) The Council clearly (unanimously if possible} articulate the purpose and primary uses of the facility. Is it a community facility for 150 people or something else? 2) That council participates in a design preferencing process that clearly identifies the desired architectural design and the associated cost for that design. A committee could work to initiate this process. However, the entire Council should agree to the look and cast of the facility. 3} Agree to a time frame for decision making for a new pavilion. F. Parking Parking continues to be a significant issue with parking an the 1=rontage Road a weekly occurrence in the ski season. There is an overall need for 800 to 1000 additional space in the Town of Vail_ There is also greater dependence on the day skiers since 9111. Several critical questions are: • What's the economic impact of the day skier? • What is the demographic make up of the skiers that are causing overflow parking? • What is the impact of Frontage Road parking an the guest experience? It appears that some guests and locals are purposely waiting to park for free on the Frontage Road.. • Who is parking for? • Should VR or we create more structure parking? is it worth $20,000 to $30,000 per space? * What is the best solution for resolving the Town's long-term parking needs? G. Bubble The lce Skating Bubble at the Goff Course has been very successful for providing additional ice time in Vail. The conditional use permit. for the bubble expires April 1 2002. The Town would need to reapply far a conditional use permit for the bubble to be used again fn 2002l2003- win#erseoson. H. Gymnastics Relocation The Tawn has discussed with the Vail Recreation District the relocation of the current gymnastics facility at the Old Town Shops. The Water District will need to proceed with improvements to their Vail plant that requires the use of the Old Town Shops land. The Council will need to consider the terms far selling. the land to the District and whether the Town should be involved in the development of a new Gymnastics facility. Since discussion began 3-4 years ago on community facilities, gymnastics facilities have been created in Eagle and Edwards. Elecfion issues for November 20012 It is not too soon to begin to consider what election issues should be considered far the 2002 ballot, Potential issues include: • Funding for the construction and/or operation of a West Vail Fire Station • Funding for a conference facility on the North Day Lot. • General Mill levy for Tawn operating costs • Financing of Lionshead Improvements. J. Environmental Quality/Projects The Tawn has quietly made significant strides in improving air quality, protecting open space, improving water quality, and developing carrying capacity thresholds. The most significant environmental issue (aside from I-?0 noise) facing the Town is sanding impacts from l-70. This has the potential to threaten the gold medal fishery of Gore Creek. This had a direct economic value to the Town of approximately $1.2 million in sales related to fly-fishing and an unquantifiable value related to having a high quality natural resource. CDOT has begun to work with the Tawn, Water District, Eagle River Watershed Council, and Eagle County to begin developing a plan for mitigation of the problem. Mitigation will focus on creating and maintaining sand traps. GDOT has created an enclosed structure for staring sand vn Vail Pass that has already helped reduce sedimentation. However, addressing this problem effectively will require a significant investment in mitigation and maintenance. Political pressure applied to CDOT will be required to ensure this investment, Other environmental project areas include; • Air Quality: Fireplace conversion program has resulted in Clean Air Act compliance.. • Water Quality: TOV has implemented national nonpoint water quality standards. • Open Space: Protected 113 of Vail land area • Carrying Capacity: Carrying capacity thresholds have been identified. • Waste: Solid Waste Plan completed in 1998. Staff is working with PEEP to inform residents on recycling opportunities. Environmental Certification: TOV requiring LEED certification in public building and incentivizing LEEQs in private development • Pine Beetle: TOV working with USFS and VRI to manage the pine beetle problem The other critical challenge from an environmental standpoint is monitoring critical environments! indicators and then communicating what the Town and the ski company are doing to be goad stewards of the environmen#. A partnership area that the Town and the ski company have identified is to jointly monitor and communicate environmental indicators. However, this has been hampered by the loss of the environmental coordinator for Vail Mountain. K. Service Levels Public Works presented the Vail Standards concept. What level of quality does the Town want to provide in terms of cleanliness, transit service, development review, and life safety? C ATTAC M EN T Other Potential Actions • Sign Code Revision • Update Vail Village Master Plan -Height? • Update Comprehensive Land, Use Plan • Loading and Delivery Plan ATTACHMENT -Example from Snowmass Memorandum To: Russell Forrest, Town of Vail Community Development Director From: Walter Kieser, Dan Guimond, and Andy Knudtsen Subject: Economic Development Programs Date: ,February 7, 2002 FPS has built a model for the Tawn of Snawmass, which is summarized on the following page. The model, in its simplest form, accounts for the multiple factors that make up the supply and drive the demand. The four primary benefits of developing a model include: ' Grounded Decision Making The comprehensive nature of this model will allow the Tawn to balance land uses and apply the findings to the comprehensive plan and areas identified for redevelopment. Uses such as retail, residential, lodging., traffic capacity, parking supply, uplaill Iift capacity are all finked. The model enables the town to test different quantities and understand haw each interacts with the others. Evaluation af;Specific Projects and Cumulative Impacts Once the model has been built, the Town can understand the benefits and costs associated with a specific development proposal, This could be particularly useful for large-scale base redevelopment projects. Additionally, the Town can estimate cumulative impacts from develapnaent aver a period of time to forecast the long-term fiscal health of the community and the Town Government. ' Data Management The model's database can be used for other purposes that are related to economic analysis, such as debt structuring, fee mechanisms, housing needs analysis, or employment needs. Fiscaf Modeling The model can be built to enable the Town to monitor its provision of services and economic stability. As the data is updated to reflect development, the model will identify capital needs and areas where higher service levels are warranted. Mare importantly, the model will forecast Town revenues so that the Tawn can ensure it has adequa#e funds for basic services in addition to prajeating revenues for future capital expenditures andfar increases to service levels. • Snowmass Resort and Facilities Economic Model Existing Conditions Supply Includes Skier Activity Table 1 Other Amenities 8, Attractions 1,603 Visitor Accommodations Table 2 1,150 Resider~tiai Units 45% alvg. occ'y 1 Table 5 9 31,647 FBB, Retail Sq.Ft. Table 8 Sales Based on Capture of Demand Sales Support Cpmmercia! Sq. Ft. t $285 isf (avg.) Demand Derived From ~ Visitors incdude --- - i ~~ 704,951 I 324,721 2,936 Overnight Visitor-Days Day Visitors Residents Table 3 i Generate Expenditures per capita 1 $70 Potential F8t3, Retail Ouemight-Visitor Expenditures Table 13 Table 4 r Generate Expenditures per cap. I $40 Potential F&B, Retail Day-Visitor Expenditures Table i5 $12,989,000 Potential FHB, Retail Day-Visitor Expenditures Table 16 $49,347,aoo Potential FBB, RetaiP Overnight-Visitor Expenditures $37,500,000 Leakage Total Capture ~ Capture Rates of Expenditures 48% avg. Table 9 32°/o auernight vis. Table 10 Y • Table 6 i Generate Expenditures per cap. I X5,600 Potential F&B, Retail Resident Expenditures Permanent Table 17 Seasonal Table 17a 1 $ 7 6,450,000 Potential F&B, Retail Resident Expenditures e 18b I Table 14 I ~ ~ Tabl I $7s,7a5,1ss /f Potential F&B, Retail Expenditures Table 11 • To: Vail Town Counciil From: Russ Forrest Date: February 19, 2a~2 Subject; Review of the Lionsf~ead Master Plan 'I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this discussion with the Town Council is to review the Lionshead Master Plan now that Vail Resorts has announced their plans to move forward with redevelopment. Staff will provide a presentation an February 19`x'that is intended to review the high points of the Lionshead Master Plan and the Lionshead Mixed Use District. The Vail Resorts proposal will not be specifically reviewed at this meeting. Attached is a memo from August 7, 2481 that reviews the public improvemen#s that the Town Council will need to consider in the near future. If Council members do not have a copy of the Lionshead Master Plan, please contact me and I would be happy to deliver a copy to you (479-214+6). 2. QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER IN THE FUTURE The following are questions the Town Council will need to consider in the future after Vail Resorts presents their full plan to the Council Critical questions the Town Council will need to consider include: • What public improvements should be developed? • How should the public improvements be financed? Does the Town Council want to consider development of a conference facility on the North Day Lot? Any effort to create a publicly supported conference center on the North Day Lot is a significant investment in time and resources. Can an alternative plan be developed to accommodate loading and delivery and skier drop-off needs if the North Day Lot is used for an alternative use? A potential alternative to a transportation center on the North Day Lot is increasing capacity for loading and delivery underneath a new hotel at the Gondola site. • How does the Town want to deal with the sale of land to private developers when they propose constructing to the build-to line (as opposed to the setback line} as the Lionshead Master Plan proposes? 3. hIEXT STEPS The following next steps need to occur in the next four to five weeks. 1. TDV and Vail Resorts staffs need to meet to review the specific loading and delivery, circulation, and phasing issues that need to be resolved. Vile are trying to facilitate this meeting in the next four to five days. ~. The Town Council needs to meet with Vail Resorts to review their proposal. 3. Staff in cooperation with Vail Resorts would like to develop a draft cost sharing proposal for the Vail Town Council to consider. A council member or two may want to participate in these discussions. Staff will develop recommendations for public improvements and the time frame far their implementation. 4. A follow-up meeting(s~ will be needed between Vail Resorts and the Town Council to develop a cost sharing agreement so that the Town has a clear understanding of what the private sector is paying for and what public funding is needed.. 5. While discussions are moving forward on Lionshead, it is recommended that the parking committee reconvene and develop a recommendation for a long term parking solution. It will be critical to know whether additional parking should be developed at the proposed employee parking structure, a# the Holy Cross site, on the Frontage Rd., andbrthe Lionshead parking structure. • To: Vail Town Council From: Staff: Russ Forrest Date; August 7th, 20Qt Subject Discussion on Lionshead Public Improvements 1. PURP05E: The purpose of this worksession is to review the public projects proposed in the ~ 999 Lionshead Master Plan. The Lionshead Master Pian area extends from Dobson Ice Rink to the Old Town Shops {See attachment A}. Staff would like to review the proposed public projects and the timing of those projects in relationship to anticipated private development. Financing sources are reviewed at the end of this memo but staff would recommend discussing the financing at a follow-up meeting after Council has evaluated and provided input on public projects. Specifically staff would like to request that Council; • Review the problem statement and objectives. Concurrence with these objectives is critical to moving forward in discussing public and private improvements in Lionshead. It should be noted that there was and still appears to be broad support for the implementation of the Lionshead Master Plan. • Provide staff with input on the critical public projects to implement. Staff has provided a score sheet to rank the various projects on a scale of i - 5 with five being the highest priority during or after the worksession, Staff would then synthesize that input and summarize the high priority actions and review the specifics of financing options at the next available worksession. 2. LIONSI-fEAD MASTER PLAN PROBLEM STATEMENT AND 013JECTIVI=S 2.1. Lionshead Redeveivnment ProblemlOvnvrtunity Statement: Lionshead backs the charm, character„ appeal and vibrancy expected of a world-class resort. It lacks a sense of arrival and sense of place. Pedestrian flaw through the mall can be confusing and disconnected. The architecture lacks a unique identity or reference to Veil`s historical antecedents or its alpine environment. Many of the buildings are physically aging and functionally under- utilized, resulting in negative impacts to property values, private r 1 I.J profits, and public revenues. Potential hospitality, retail and ~ i recreational uses, and community amenities are unmet or unrealized. It would be short-sighted to ignore these conditions and do nothing. The opportunity exists for the public and private sectors to act collaboratively to renew and revitalize this important component of our community. 2.2 Lionshead Redevelopment Policy Objectives: Objective 1. RENEWAL AND REDEVELOPMENT Lionshead can and should be renewed and redeveloped to become a warmer, more vibrant environment for guests and residents. Lionshead needs an appealing and coherent identity, a sense of place, a personality, a purpose, and an improved aesthetic character. Objective 2. VITALITY AND AMENITIES We must seize the opportunity to enhance guest experience and community interaction through expanded and additional activities and amenities such as performing ar#s venues, conference facilities, ice rinks, streetscape, parks and other recreational improvements. Objective 3. STRONGER ECONOMIC BASE THROUGH INCREASED "LfVE BEDS'` In order to enhance the vitality and viabiiity of Vail, renewal and redevelopment in Lionshead must promote improved occupancy rates (i.e., "live beds" or `warm pillows") and the creation at additional bed base through new lodging product. Objective 4. IMPROVED ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The flaw of pedestrian, vehicular, bicycle and mass transit traffic must be improved within and through Lionshead. Objective ~. IMPROVED INFRASTRUCTURE The infrastructure of Lionshead, including streets, walkways, transportation systems, parking, utilities, loading and delivery systems, snow removal and storage, and other public and private services must be upgraded to meet the capacities and service standards required to support redevelopment and revitalization efforts and to meet the expectations of our guests and residents. Objective 6. CREATIVE FINANCING FOR ENHANCED PRIVATE PROFITS AND PUBLIC REVENUES Redevelopment in Lionshead must be undertaken in a financially creative, but feasible, manner sa that. adequate capital may be raised from all possible sources to fund desired private and public improvements. • 3. LIONSHEAQ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Attached is Chapter Nine from the Lionshead Master Plan which reviews the complete list of projects {See Attachment B). The following is a list of high priority projects described in the Master Plan. In 2~D00, the Town adopted new zoning for the Lionshead Area which provides incentives for private developers to implement the plan on private property. The following is a description of the public improvements that were approved in the Master Plan that are intended to be built as private redevelopment occurs. Many private property owners have engaged designers to evaluate opportunities but significant redevelopment most likely will not occur until the core site ar Gondola building is redeveloped. The Town will need to be prepared to move forward with public improvements a# the time the Gondola building moves forward with applying for building permits. 3.1 North Dav LotlTransit Center IssuelChallenge: There are four modes of traffic currently at the east Lionshead Circle entrance: pedestrian, skier drop-off, loading and delivery, and hotel shuttle van drop-off. This creates an unsafe situation and an unattractive guest entrance to the Lionshead retail area. Pedestrians currently have to negotiate through thraugh delivery trucks and cars to cross from the parking structure to the Lionshead retail area. Salution/Timing: The Master Plan recommends relocating the loading and delivery uses and the skier drop off =cars and vans) to the North Day Lot. This was a critical action in the Lionshead Master Plan that is to occur with the development of the Gondola building. The development of this transit center would also trigger acceleration and deceleration lanes on the Prootage Rd. The North Day lot is owned by Vail Resorts. The cost for this improvement is estimated at $15 million without land cost. One of the other primary reasons for creating a transit center on the north day lot is to create a major new point of entry into the pedestrianlretail core. North Day LoUTransr"t Center ~ ' 3.2 East Lionshead Pedestrian Portal: Issue/Challenge: 13y moving loading and delivery and skier drop off to the north day lot, a safer more attractive pedestrian crossing can be made across East Lionshead Circle. SolutionlTiming: Implement the Lionshead streetscape plan for the East Lionshead pedestrian portal. This needs to be done both in conjunction with redevelopment at Vail 21 and with the Gondola site. In addition aback-up or supporting loading and delivery facility is possible on the west end of the Lionshead Parking Structure. If the development of a new transit facility on the north day lot is not possible in the required timeframe, then a relatively inexpensive loading and delivery tacility on the west end of the parking structure would be possible. A trade-off to consider with this location for loading and delivery is that the Vail Center contemplated putting the skatepark on the west end of the parking structure. Total cost for the portal is approximately $3 million (this does not include a loading and delivery area on the west end of the parking structure}. East Lionshead Circle SE corner of parking structure 3.3 l=ast Lionshead Circle Issue/Challenge: The Lionshead Master Plan identifies the need to improve the streetscape along East Lionshead Circle and to connect to the West Meadow Drive streetscape program to facilitate a smooth and pleasant pedestrian connection between the two villages. Solution: The estimated cost for improved streetscape and landscape between the East Lionshead Portal and Dobson was approximately $1 million. The Plan also proposed a retail frontage along She south side of the Lionshead Parking • Structure. It was contemplated that this land could be provide to a developer that would create 15` floor re#ail development. This area has also been identified for use by the Vail Center for youth recreational programs. East Lionshead Circle-south of the Lionshead Parking Structure 3.4 Frontage Rd ImQrovements IssuelChallenge: The Lionshead Master Plan transportation analysis assumed that with complete build out of Lionshead there could be a89 additional dwelling units and 93,000 net square feet of commercial uses, This could generate an additional 1 fi0 trips into Lionshead during AM hours and 340 trips during PM hours. Solution/Timing: Additional trips are mitigated by the transportation facility on the North Day lot and acceleration and deceleration lanes on the Frontage Road. In addition, the Plan calls for landscaping along the Frontage road and landscaped medians. Since the plan was adapted, the Town has discussed parallel parking that would need to be designed. Total cost is $i 5 million. Payment for the Frontage Road was assumed to come from the Town, private development, and the Colorado Department of Transportation. The Marriott and the antlers have committed to the cost of Frontage Rd, improvements based on their estimated trip generation. The total cost to the Town could be as low as $5 million if CDpT and private development provided 66% of the funds to pay far the improvements. Frontage Rd Lionshead Parking Structure to West Lionshead Circle 3.5 Pedestrian Mall Streetscaoe Imorovemenis Issue: The first objective of the Lionshead Master Plan states ~~Lianshead can and should be renewed and redeveloped to become a warmer, more vibrant environment for guests and residents. Lionshead needs an appealing and coherent identity, a sense of place, a personality, a purpose, and an unproved aesthetic character." Improving the streetscape and having property owners construct to the build to line will create an exciting retail environment, which will be critical to the success of Lionshead Redevelopment. Solution: The plan calls for the development of 91,000 square feet of new streetscape and landscape. The estimated cost far this improvement includes the cost of heated pavers. However, further discussions are needed to determine if from an environmental standpoint the area should be entirely heated. This work should be done in conjunction with adjacent redevelopment. The total cost is approximately $9 million. The Plan does assume that private developers would significantly off set this cost. This contribution could be as much as 100°t° of the public improvements directly adjaoent to the property. However, since it will not be possible to plan the timing of private development it is anticipated that the Town could pay up to 50°1° of the streetscape improvements. Therefore the total Town investment in this part of the project could be approximately $4.5 million. New plaza directly soufh of the North Day Laf 8.6 West Lionshead Circle Issue: West Lionshead Circle will be the main entrance to a new high end hotel on the current Gondola Building site. Appropriate streetscape improvements are needed to support bath the pedestrian traffic and provide the necessary aesthetic for a high. end betel. In addition resurfacing of the West Lionshead Circle would be included in this component of the project. Solution: Implement the streetscape plan for West Lionshead Circle that includes a primary and secondary pedestrian walkway with furnishings, lighting, and landscape improvements. Cost is approximately $1.5 million for this project. 6 West Lionshead Circle to new hotel However, the plan contemplates that 10©% of this cost would be met by private developers. 3.7 Parkina The Lionshead Master Plan recognizes the need #or additional parking in Lionshead and Vaii as a whole. Two sites were identified for additional parking. Fjrst the Plan suggests an additional deck on the Lionshead Parking Structure. This has a cost of $14.5 million. Second, the plan recommends was creating addjtional public parking in West Lionshead in conjunction with Vail Resorts development of either the West Day lot or the Holy Cross Site. Additional discussions are occurring with the parking task force on a short term and long term set of solutions for addressing parking demand. 3.8 Gore Creek ImorovementslPassive Recreation Area There was interest in the plan far creating recreational opportunities within the streetscape plan and enhancing Gore Creek. One specific idea was to improve the wetland area across Gore Creek from the Born Free Lift. This area has been improved since the completion of the plan by closing social trails, weed abatement, and planting wetland species. There is a Lionshead Park in the proposed RETT Budget for 2004 for approximately $79x,000. 4. SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL FUNDING OPTIONS After the Town Council determines the highest priority public projects to implement in Lionshead it then is important to evaluate the various #inancing options. Staff will review each option in greater detail at the next available wor4csession. The following table provides a summary of the various funding options. I Option petit Seruice or Cash using the Capital Projects Fund General ftillill i_evy kncrease:(Property Tax) This requires a vote of registered voters in Vail. Value $4 milkion is auailable per year. This source of funding might be adequate for funding the $4 million in streetscape improvements over several vears. 1 mil increase $t9-$14 miAian in bonding capacity assuming a 25 year loan Pros It does not require a new revenue source • It could finance the streetscape improvements, which is critical for improving the retail environment. • Straight forward process fior election • Everyone in Vail pays Cans • This source of funding is inadequate to pay fior Frontage Rd improvements and the North Day lot transit facility • Lionshead improvements would compete with other capital projects. Most likeky would not be successful if there are other competing questions on the ballot i.e. Vail Center It is a new tax Residerts outside of Lionshead may argue this does rat directly support their property. Option Business Improvement District, or a Speeial Improvement District or a special assessment: These are all tools to increase property tax within the geographic area that the improvements are occurring. They require a vote of property owners within th8 district Sales Tax -Requires a vote of all registered voters Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Urban Renewal Au#hority (URA): A URA requires the Town to create a plan that identifies the improvements and a district. Then Vail registered voters must approve of the Town issuing debt. down-Town Development Authority (DDA): Requires a vote to create the District and a vote to issue bonds. It also involves creating a separate board to oversee the revenue and the capital projects called out for in the plan. Property owners, time-share owners, and individuals holding leases in the district vote in a DDA. Value 1 mil increase in Lionshead would generate $58,OOOlyearin debt service payment 1 millionlyr. debt service payment for 25 yr, _ $10 million Pros More secure fund for bending People that benefit most pay for the costs Cons • Inadequate tax base for significant debt SerVlCe. • 5ignifiicant new property tax for owners in District. • Gost would be passed on, most likely, to businesses leasing property. • Straight forward Sales Tax is already t % increase in process for election high compared to sales tax = $3.8 Everyone in Vail pays other Colorado miilionlyear or jurisdictions,. $34 million in bonding caoacity • Tif is not a new tax. It generates revenue based on projected increases in property values and sales tax. Instead of new incremental property or sales tax going to other taxing entities (county, schools) they would go to pay for improvements in the district. The other taxing entities still make the same amount of revenue that they did prior to the formation of a district. There are two ways to create a TIF district: 1 j Urban Renewal Authority and 2) a Downtown Development Authority. Could generate Not a new tax to Requires a $29 million if property owners declaration of blight. fund used both Requires 1 vote when Property owners sales and ready to bond by concerned about property tax. registered voters property being It would only floes not require the declared blighted generate $16 creation of another and condemnation. million if property political body County has not tax is used been supportive to date. Could generate Requires a resolution $29 million if to prevent blight fund used both versus declaring sales and blight. property tax. There are no It would only additional generate $t6 condemnation million if property powers with a DDA. tax were used. All property owners in district get to vale - this is a positive to some homeowners and not to others. • Requires a vpte of all property owners in the District to create the District and a Z"d vote to band • Requires a separate board to manage TIF fund, • County has not been supportive to date. The County clerk considers this a significant logistical problem. • • a-_ ~s=.--~ e s%1.1 '4i J.i QY C7 is J..i d ~ '~ w ~~ ,:, ~&' Attachment B CHAPTER 9 IMPLE'.VtE~1T.4TION r t .~J :~ M CI-~APTER 9 Implementation The intent of this chapter is to provide guidance [o the Town of Vail as it seeks to implement the recommendations of this master plan. The recommendations regarding priorities, pha.5ing, and timing are intended to be flexible, not binding, so that the community can adapt the plan to changing conditions and priorities. The project priorities listed below are divided into public and private improvements, although many projects will be implemented through joint public and private financing efforts. 9.1 Projecf Prioritization 9.1.1 Publie improvements The following list of major public improvements outlined in previous chapters suggests priorities based on the relative importance of projects and the interrelationships among them. (The plan acknawledffes, however, that other variables also influence future implementation decisions, including construction costs and funding availability. For example. the construction of a Gore Creek recreation path bypass is not as critical to the implementation of the master plan as the north day Iot transportation center, but it might be built sooner because of its lower cost and access to RETT funds.) 9.1.1.1 North Dav Lat Transit Center This component is essential to the implementation of the Lionshead Master Plan because: a. It is a prerequisite j~'ar ether critical projects, It will be impossible or very difficult to proceed with other essential projects prior to the construetion of the transit center, among them: • The East Lionshead Pedestrian Porta]_ ~ critical component of the pedestrian portal i5 the removal of the existing skier drop- off, service and delivery, and local/regional shuttle activity. The master plan relocates aiI of these activities. to the north day lot transit center. The existing level of service and delivery traffic can be accommodated~in the proposed surface facility on the west end of the parking structure, but this is a short term solution that does not provide for expanded service and delivery needs. LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 9-1 CHAPTER 9 iMI'LEivIENTATION Concert Hall Plaza Redevelopment. The master plan recommends the removal of the existing Concert Hall Plaza transit stop in order to create a larger redevelopment parcel and to enhance the west Lionshead pedestrian portal. ~.lthau~h this transit stop could be eliminated today. it wiIi Iikeiy be replaced in the north day lot transit facility. Vail Community/ Civic Center. It will be difficult to remc.~re the charter buses tram the future civic center site before a new pick-up and drop-off point is created at the north da_y lot transit. center. Retail Expansion. Retail expansion in the Lionshead pedestrian core will necessitate the creation of new service and delivery facilities, which the master plan recommends locating at the earth day lot transit center. In addition, a significant arnaunt of curre~zt service and delivery traffic an West Lionshead Circle that now occurs illegally in the fire lane south of the Landmark Townhomes and in the street would move to that facility. b. It will energi<.e a netiv corridor into Li©nslreacl fr~tn the north. C)ne of the primary reasons for a transit center on the north day lot is to create a major new point of entry into the pedestrian/ retail core. The influx of additional. pedestrian traffic generated by the transit center will energize the western end of the core area and make retailers there mare successful. c. Future transit irnplicAt~ns If any future technology transit system connects thr©ugh the Lionshead resort core in the future, the i`*iorth Day Lot transportation center will play an integral rose in connecting to and providing for a central transit stop in Lionshead. 9,1.1?' The East Lionshead Pedestrian Portal The East Lionshead pedestrian portal is the single most heavily utilized point of entry into Lionshead and Vail as a whale (based upon skier numbers accessing the mountain). The implementation of the master plan recommendations for this portal will significantly affect the character and visual perception of the study area. 9.1.X.3 The West Lionshead Pedestrian Pc~rta! The West Lionshead pedestrian portal is critical to the functianin~~ of the retail core. Taut it is dependent on the redevelopment of at least one private property (Concert Hall Plaza). It is strongly recommended that the Town of Vaii wank with the owners of this propert~~ to facilitate its redevelopment. P~~E9-2 LI(~ZSI-IEAD REi~EVELQP1~lENT IVIASTER FLA~`~' ~. CHAr ~ r;R 4 IMPLEMENTATION 9.1.1.4 Public Space improvements in the Pedestrianl Retail Core Virtually erual in importance to the two portals into Lionshead is the duality of the pedestrian! retail mall itse]f. The recommendations made in the site desi~n guidelines for the primary pedestrian mall are critical to this improvement. It is recommended that the adjacent property owners, including but not limited to Vai] Associates. participate in planning and funding the implementation of these improvements as they redevelop or expand their properties. 9.1.1.5 Sdev<~aik and Streetscape irnprovements Enhancements to Lionshead's streets and pedestrian circulation patterns are important both functionally and visually. Rather than undertaking the major improvements by itself, the Town of Vail is advised to ask for the financial participation of adjacent properties as they redevelop or expand. - 9.1.1.6 Development on the South Face of the Parking Structure and East Lionshead Circle Streetscape This project includes two important elements: the creation of a retaillcommercial and housing component and the enhancement of the East Lionshead Circle pedestrian corridor_ Although these projects can stand alone, or could occur prior to adjacent projects. they are closely related to the East Lionshead pedestrian portal, the Vail Civic Center. the addition of parking decks to the existing parking structure, and the streetscape connection along West Meadow Drive to Vail Village. The Town of Vail's efforts to promote housing far locals causes these protects to take on a higher priority. 9.1.1.7 South Frontage Rand Realignment and improvements The improvement of South Frontage Read. including widening and accelerationldeceleration lanes. will become more critical as existing properties redevelop and add density. The timing of roadway improvements depends not only on the pace of redevelopment but also on the abslity to finance the improvements. Decisions about reali~nin~ ,~ _ the road are continent on the development plans far the west day lot and the Vail Associates service yard. It is likely that the improvements wiil happen. in significant phases. Imposition of impact fees an projects that add density or traffic volume to Lionshead is one means to secure long-term funding. IC is important to note. however. certain improvements are needed now ]acceleration/deceleration lanes,. si~nagel, making it mare difficult to charge those expenses to future projects. ~- LIONSHEAD REDEVELOP;kfENT IVIASTER PLAN PAGE 9- CI-TAPTER 9 IMPLEME?~"f.4TI©N 9.1.1.8 9.1.1.9 9,1.1.10 Parking Current needs may justify expansion of 5~}U parking spaces town wide today, but further study of future parking demand may be needed to verify this, Additional decks on the existing structure or a new {public structure in west Lionshead may be necessary when the Vail Civic Center is constructed or development occurs on the west day lot and ~ the Vail Associates service yard. In any case, the development of the west day lot will necessitate replacement of this existing private parking with either structured parking or an adjacent surface lat. If future parking studies demonstrate a need for significant public parking in the west Lionshead area, a joint venture between V ail .Associates, the Town of Vail, and other potential development interests should be considered. Vail Civic Center r-ldditional parlkng must be built (in the existing Lion~;head parking structure or nearby] and the charter bus parking lot must be relocated before the Vail Civic Center can be built. In addition. this project will be integrally tied to development on the south face of the Lionshead parking structure and the streetscape enhancements along East Lionshead Circle. This will be a huge project and is likely to occur only after a (anger period of planning and fund raising; other. more critical elements of the master plan should not be rrtade contingent on its tmpiernentation. West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place Realviignrnertt The realignment of this intersection, white important. is not critical to the implementation of the master plan; it could be done in conjunction with the redevelopment of adjacent buildings. Rede~~elapment projects that are linked to improvement of the intersection are the Vail Associates core site redevelopment due to the potential increase in traffic volume accessing the core site via Lionshead Place) and Concert Hall Plaza. Concert Nall Plaza redevelopment may not increase the volume of traffic on West Lionshead Circle, but it will facilitate the creation of a stronger west Lionshead pedestrian ported, of which this intersection is a critical component. PAGE 9-- I.IONSHE.AD RI~DEVEL~PMEtiT MASTER PLAiv CHA,PTRR 9 IMFLEMEN'I ATION w• 9.1.1.11 Gore Creek Corridor improvements Improvements in the Gore Creek corridor will Greatly enhance the ability of locals and Guests to experience the creek but are not vital to the overall functionality of I.ionshead. However. these improvements are stand-alone projects. not continent on adjacent redevelopment, and thus may be significantly easier to implement. both financially and logistically. Because the creek is a significant benefit to Lonshead. the implementation of improvements here should be diligently pursued taut not allowed to delay other, more critical plans. 9.1.2 Private llznprovements 9.1.2,1 Individual Property Redevelopment and Exterior Renovations . The improvement of individual properties through redevelopment, site enhancement. and exterior renovation is critical to the accomplishment of master plan goals. The Town of Vail should create incentives. encaura~e. and facilitate these important projects. usinc the master plan as a framework to guide renewal and redevelopment projects. The specific recommendations of the plan- including the architectural design guidelines, are nor intended to create a disincentive f©r redevelopment or exterior renovations. If any provision of the plan proves over time to create a disincentive for desired renewal or redevelopment, Town Council should consider amending it 9.1.2.2 Core Site Hotel A high end resort hole! in the core of Lionshead is a top priority for the Town of Vail. which should provide incentives, encourage, and facilitate this project. In conjunction with redevelopment of this site. the skt yard should be improved. a new skier bridge constructed. and adjacent pedestrian systems enhanced according to the guidelines set forth in the master plan. 9.1.2.3 Retail Expansion 4 i~. The expansion of certain ground #7oar retail buildings, as outlined in the master plan, is critical to the overall success of the retail! pedestrian core area. These projects should be expected to participate as well in the enhancement of adjacent pedestrian systems accordin4 to the guidelines set forth in the master plan. The Town of Vail should provide incentives, encourage, and facilitate these projects. 9.1.2.4 Concert Hall Plaza/ `West Lionslzead Pedestrian Portal The redevelopment of Concert Hall Plaza will be a private project, but it also represents a critical public interest; the creation of the west LIONSHE.4D REDEVELOPMENT iVIASTER PLAN PAGE }-S CHr.FTER 9 71vI1'LEMENTATION Lionshead pedestrian portal. All. reasonable efforts should be made by the Tawn to provide incentives. encourage, and facilitate this project. 9.1.2.5 West Lionshead Locall Employee Housing The development of a significant housing supply in west Lionshead should be a cs~mponent of any plans to tear down the Sunbird Lodge and redevelop the Vail Associates care site. Housing is linked to the realignment of South Frontage Road, the possible construction of a new west Lionshead parking structure, and additional development on the west day lot and the Vail Associates service yard. To the 4reatest extent possible,. all of these projects should be planned concurrently, and the sequence in which they are implemented should not preclude other future projects. It should be considered a priority by the Town of Vail to determine how much. if any, public paricin4 should occur in this area. 9.2 Mitigation oaf Construction Impacts As Lionshead redevelops. especially in the pedestrian/ retail core, it is critical that all efforts be made to minimize the impact on existing businesses and merchants. Toward that cod the followin4 recommendations are made: 9.2.1 phasing Construction projects should be phased and scheduled so that no significant area of Lionshead (such as the retail core j is isolated or completely shut down as a result of construction. While it is recognized that short-terrzl impacts will occur, starefronts and critical pedestrian circulation patterns should not be blocked. Every effort should be made to maintain pedestrian access during construction. Tf a complete shutdown of an area is ever necessitated it should be scheduled for the fall or spring shoulder season to minimize the impact on businesses. 9.2.2 Canstz-uetion Mitigation Construction impacts include, but are not limited to, noise. dust, equipment exhaust, delivery traffic, and visual impacts. Construction projects that may impact public pedestrian corridors or the pedestrian core must take all reasonable measures to mitirrate these impacts. Potential mitigation measures include the creative use of construction fencing (such as ttte "kidzone" construction barriers utilized in Beaver Creek and the Vail ViI]aQel, remote staging areas. and the careful timing of particularly disruptive or noisy construction events. P'AtsaEu9-C I.IOIVSHEAD R.EDEVELQP1vlE?V'T h/IASTER PLAN CHAPTER 9 IMPLEMENTAT~~N 9.2.3 i4larketing Special marketing efforts are recommended to help draw consumers. into Lionshead during* construction periods. 9.2.4 Short-Term Relocation Tl-te Town of Vail should work with developers to plan for the temporary relocation of retail businesses that will be displaced by redevelopment. After the proposed development on the south face of the parking structure is completed. ground Boor retail/office spaces in that building could satisfy this short term need, 9.3 Financing The Town of Vail can use several financing tools to implement public improvement projects and provide incentives for private development- The list that follows is not exhaustive. nor is it clear which tool will prove to be the best means to implement the master plan, Potential legal issues associated with the individual financial mechanisms are not addressed. ,. 9.3.E Private Development Incentives M 9.3.1..1. Parking Pay-in-Lieu Relief The parking regulations require a parking pa_y-in-lieu fee for parking that cannot be provided on site. This fee, currently in excess of ~ 17,C}00 per required parking space- is a major obstacle to the redevelopment of buildings in Lionshead. Reduction of the parking requirement- as well as the fee, should be considered in the implementation of the master plan, This proprasa] is particularly relevant to projects that can demonstrate a negligible impact on parking generation- y 9.3.1.2 Parking Requirement Reiiuction The current parking regulations do not take into account the high volume of pedestrian traffic and use of public transit that occur in Vail. The regulations are derived from suburban models. not resort communities. where parking supply is shared by multiple uses. By ~ncreassna the cost of development. htgh parking rcr~u~rements for individual uses in Lionshead may be a disincentive for redevelopment. LIC]NSHEAD REDEVELOPIti~ZENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 9-7 CRAFTER 9 IMPLEMEti'TATIQN 9.3.1.3 Density Incentives Increases in allowable density are recommended in the Lionshead study area as an incentive for property owners to redevelop existing properties. 9.3.1.E Tax Incentives Tax reductions ar tax rebates should be considered to aid in the redevelopment of existin; properties. They may help property owners defray interest and other recurring costs associated with redevelopment. Tax incentives must be balanced with the need to generate public revenue for future public improvements. 9.3.2 Public Improvements 9.3.2.1 Tax Increment Financing {'I'TF} Tax increment financing is one of the most effective tools available for redevelopment of Lionshead. TIF allows the community tc~ capture a portion of tax revenues that normally go to the county and to utilize them locally instead to implement public improvements. TIF does net raise taxes: it reallocates the r~icrernenral property or sales tax revenues resulting from improvements within the district and uses those revenues. to repay bonds issued to finance the irrmprovements. While it is very difficult to forecast TIF bonding capacity without knowing how many redevelopment projects will occur, it is estimated that the Vail Associates core site alone (assuming an approximate construction budget of ~ ] 50,0{~C}.40C1) would generate approximately ~25,flOQ.aDO in bonding capacity. 9.3.2.2 Special Assessment District A special assessment district could also be utilized ro fund public improvements in Lionshead. It is a somewhat less attractive option than tax increment financing because it rewires that a new taxing district be created. Under the Tabor Amendment, this can only be done with an affirmative vote of the community. 9.3.2.3 application of Impact Fees The construction of public improvements in Lionshead.may also be funded through assessments on redevelopment projects according to their estimated impact an streets and public infrastructure. However. if considered, it needs to be balanced with the. incentives offered to encourage redevelopment. This option should not become a disincentive to redevelopment. pA~~g_g LIQNSHE,'~D REDEVEL®PMENT MASTER PLAN CfiAr 1 ~R 9 IMPLEMENTATIC)N 9.3..2.4 Real Estate Transfer Tax (RET'I`} The real estate transfer tax will continue to be a source of funding for public recreation and open space in the Town of Vail and should be utilized to the maximum extent possible far appropriate projects in Lionshead. 9.3.Z.S Municipal B[~nds Municipal bands are an important option for funding public improvements in Lionshead, although the issuance of bonds will likely require an affirmative vats under the Tabor Amendment. 9.3.2.6 Grants The Town of Vail and private entities should aggressively seek grants as a source of funding public improvements. 9.4 Revenues and Costs 9.4.1 Revenues The following is a summary of potential public revenues from taxes and development in Lionsbead. • 9.4.1.1. Tax Revenue A re4°enue impact model was developed for Lionshead by Stan Bernstein and Associates, [nc. {submitted to the Town of Vail on .Pone 24, 1998 and attached, with notes, as appendix 13). The revenue impact model i5 based on the prdjccted developmer~r raxodel attached as appendix I7. The revenue projections shown in figure 9.1 assume a five-story average building height and full Build-out of rile study area in accordance with the master plan. They do rt.nt include potential revenues or costs associated with tax increment financing. 9.4.1.2 Revenue from Development Three potential revenue-generating projects are located on Town. of Vail property in the Lionshead study area. Projected construction costs and revenue from these projects are described below and summarized in figure 9.2. a. 5nutlz Force of the Parkrn~ Structure. Flo signii'ieant revenue for the Town is assumed frorn the proposed upper-level housing component of this project, although there may be enough to cover the cost of construction. Estit7lated construction costs fc~r the housing component are otttlined in section 9.5.2 below. Figure 9.2 LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT lt~iASTEIt PLAN PAG£ 9-9 CHAPTER 9 IMPLEMENTATIDN shoes the construction cost of the retail component only and does not include any adjacent streetst:apc enhancements. b. Infill De~fel.~pment at the fast Lir»zshead Pedeszr~an Pr~rttal. The estimate in figure 9,2 assumes athree-story building on this site,. the first floor of which wil3 fie retail space and the upper two levels sold fee simple as resiiiential space. c. ltafill Develn~m~errt cat the Geratrcal Pe~lestr•ran Plaza. The estimate in figure 9.2 assumes a ttva-story building on this site. Qnly half of the floor space is being ailocated to revenue producing uses; the remainder may tae putalic space fur restrooms and uses associated with activities in the adjacent plaza. a, Incremersttl recun~ine. revenue Weighted towards fractional ownership Revenues X3,358,587 ~n of "town 199$ budget i4.90~T~ 1~'eighted towards whole ownership Revenues X2,607,487 9r, of Town 199$ budget 1 1.6o9e h. I crementai non-recu~T ink rea! estate transfer taxes Weighted towards f'ractinnal ownersl-~p Revenue5~ ~~ ~4,98(].OC1f~ Weighted towards whop: ownership Revenues ~3,52Ci,5(10 c. Incremental non-recurring construction permits Weighted towards fraetionai owners~iip Reaenues~ X2,999,848 VGeigltted towards whole orvncrsl3i~ ~ - Revenues~ $2.999.848 Fisure 9-1-Tax based revenue P,aG~9-10 LIOI~SHE..A,D I~EDEVELQPMEI'~TT MASTER PLAN 'TER 9 IiViPLE:~4ENTATIOIv' South Face of arltinr stir~c tir retail coma ?ne t Construction ~~ ~ Total~sq. ft. ost tier s ~t. Total ~~ [ 2,600 ~ ~ 1~O,C10 X1,890,000.00 Annual Retail Revenue Totat sq. ft. Lease per sq. ft. Total ~~ 12,6()0 X34.00 ~ $37$,000.00 East Liansh~ d Pedestri n ~ portal infill building Construction ~ Total sq. t. Cosh per sq. ft. Total First floor retail 6, 135 ~ I S4A0 5920,250.00 Second and third t7oar re.s, 12,270 X254.00 S3,t}67,5t7U.(}0 Tatal constructian cost $3,967,7St1.00 Revenue Tatai s~. ft. Sales ner sq. f`t. Total Annual retail revenue fi, 135 `);45.00 $276,U75.0{l Residential sales revenue 17,2701 ~SD0.00 ~G.I35.040.00 Approx. initial profit ~ ~ ~ x+2,147,250.00 Approx. recurring revenue ~ $27f~,075.00 Central ped s rtan plaza retai! infill struc~ure Construction ~atal sq. ft. Cost per sq. ft. Total ~ Ci,40U $ i 50.00 '~y60.Ot)0.04 Annual Retail Revenue Total sq• ft. Lease per s4. ft. Total 6.400 $45;04 $286,0!)0.00 Total development baseri revert:aes Total construction casts ~. ~~~~ ~ ~ ~• ;~G,837,750.{30 Total sales revenue $b,'13S.CF()O.L'© Total sales profit (lass? f$702,7~0.00) Total recurrinfi lease revenue $9Q2,075.00 Figure 9.2- De~efopment based revenue ~.~.z c~sfs Construction costs are autiined tar the followving patentiai projects. These casts :ire Lased upon "artier of rrtagnitude'r unit costs; a more detailed analysis would require a completed design scenario. All costs are based on ! 998 dollars and cQnsta-uction industry norms. In addition to inflation, issrtes such as materials, labor, and transpr~rtationl shipping costs may impact the accuracy of these figures. Cost estimates are for c~nceprrral planning purposes only and are not a substitute for detailed cost analysis. Order of rnagnitude costs could nary as much as i5% in either direction. • SHEAD REDEVEL©PMENT MASTED PLAN PAGE 9-? 1 CIIA~TER 9 IMPLEI~~ENTATiON A. Prznar~~f Secondary Pedestrian Plaza Tl~-is area constitutes all the primary and secondary pedestrian plaza areas of the Lionshead pedestrian.! retail core and adjoining pedestrian plaza areas. This figure includes all snowmelted pedestrian surfaces, site furnishings, lighting, and landscaping. Quantity Unit Unit Cast Subtotal 91,044 ~ S.F. ~ $ 94.44 ~,$ 8,194,004.44 A. Friznary! Secondary Pedestrian Plaza Total $ 8,19Q,Q0(}.40 B. East Lionshead Circle ~ -- - . ] .Housing development on south face of parking structure. Phis figure does not include the ground floor retail component, shown in the revenue section. This figure assumes twc~ }evels of housing at approxirr-ately 12,[04 s.f. per plate. This cost will most likely be recouped through the sales or lease revenue of the housing, potentially retr~oving it from long range budgetary requirements. Quantity Unit ~ Unit Cast ~ Subtotal 25,244 ~ S.F. $ 154.40 $ 3,784,444A4 2. Pedestrian improvements north side cif East Lionshead Circle, from back of ct-rb to face of building. This figure includes all pedestrian surfaces, site furnishings, lighting, and landscaping. Also included are pedestrian improvements associated with the potential Vai! Civic Center on the east end of East Lionshead Circle. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal 1},140' S.F ~ $ 45.04 ~ $ 859,504.04 ~. 3. Pedestrian improvements on south side of East Lionshead Circle. This figure includes all pedestrian surfaces (6' concrete walk), site furnishings, lighting and lattdacaping. This figure d©es nor include the pedestrian plaza on the east end of the street associated with the Vail Civic Center. Quantity Unit Unit Cast Subtotal 354 1 L.F. ~ $ 344,44 ~ $ ~ 145,444.44 ~.~ 4. Resurfacing/ reconstructioia of East Lionshead Circle, back of curb to back cif curb. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal 970 I L.F. I $ 354.44 ~ $ .. 339,504.00 B. East Lionshead Circle Total ~~ ~~~~ ~~ $ 5,084,[l(10.00 PaG~9-12 LIOI~SHEAI] REDi/VELOPMENT MASTER PLAN .CI~IAPTER 9 IMPLEMENTATION lC. Easf Lionshead Pedestrian Portal 1. Pedestrian Plaza. This figure includes all pedestrian plaza surfaces, including the v'ehicula crossing area, site furnishings, lighting, landscaping, and other associated. improvements. Quanfity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal { ] 1,850 ~ S.F. ~ $ 90.00 ~ ~ 1,06b,500A4 2. Architectural Landmark. This is an approximate figure to construct a potential free standing "Iandrnari~ element" at the East Lionshead pedestrian portal such as a clock tower. Quantity Unit Unit Cosf Snbtatal 1 ~ L.S. ~ $ 500,400.40 ~ $ 500,40Q.04 head Pedestrian Portal Total .. ~ ~ 1,56G,500.(10 C. East Lions ]~. Vail International fire lane ~~.- - -- -. _...-~ ,_ This figure is for an appro~cimately 22' wide asphalt fire lane as dc;scribed in the master plan and includes the pedestrian/ vehicular surface and adjacent landscape improvements. ~~ Quantity Unit ~ Unit Cost ~ Subtotal 570 ~ L.F. $ 300.04 $ 171,044.04 D. 'Vail International fire lane Total ~ ~ ~ $ I.71,000.0U East Lionshead service area - 1. Surface improvements. This figure includes all curb and gutter, paving surfaces, and other necessary icn rovements. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Sabtofal 11,b75 S.F. ~ $ 15.00 I ~ 175,125.40 2. Service buildin . nit Unit C~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ _ . Quantity ~ ~ ost Subtota! ~ . 1,260' S.F. , $ 125.04 ~ $ 1.57,540.40 3. Landscape improvements ~~ Quantity Unit Unit Cost ~ ~Subtota! 2,285 ~ S.F. 1 $ 12:04 f S 27,424.40 4. 4nooing Snow removal. This site is currently used as the primary snow relrtoval point for the Lionshead parking structure and this function will require replacement if this service and ~i delivery facility is constructed. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal 1 ~ Annual ~ ~ 240,000.00 ~ $ 200,040.00 ~. blast Lionshead service area Total $ 560,045.00 L[ON5h[EAD REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 9-1~ CHAPTER 9 IIVIPLI~MENTATIC3N F. South Frontage Road 1. Widening of South frontage road. This figure includes all vehicular surfaces (through east and west bound lanes, left and right hand accel/dece] Janos, shoulders), lighting, adjacent pedestrian walkway, lighting and adjacent landscaping. This figure also assumes the above improvements Pram the main Vail round-a-bout to the Vail Cascade intersection. Quantity Urrit Unit Cost I Subtotal 7,aoo ~ L.F. I ~ 1,20o.oa ~ s,sso;©oo.oo ,. 2. Center landscaped median. This figure includes a 16' raised landscaped median in all locations not required far left turn accelldecel lanes. For purposes of this estimate, it is assumed that this treatment vrill occur over 60'~r. of the read improvement length. Quantity Unit ~ Unit Cost Subtotal 4,440 L,F. ~ $ 350.00 ~ ~ 1,55~~,000.00 3. Intersection improvements. This figure includes the extra signaae, lighting, and landscaping improvements at South Frontage Road intersections with the parking structure entry, East Lionshead Circle, both intersections ~^ith West Lionshead Circle, and Forest Road. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal 5 ~ Each I $ 75,000.00 1 $ 375,fl00.00 F. South Frontage Road Total $ 10,809,OU0.00 Note: The above figures do not include the re-alignment of the Soutli Frontage Road nor the reconstruction of the Red Sandstone Creek bridge. G. Realignment of South Frontage Road 1. Realignment of 1,750 linear feet of the South Frontage Road. Includes all vehicular and pedestrian improvements, as well as adjacent landscaping and center landscape medians. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal I,750 L.F. ~ $ 1,550.00 ~ $ 2,712,SOO.OU 2. Reconstruction of Red Sandstone Creek bridge. This cost assumes a 50' span with a minimum 4 lane traffic section plus an adjacent pedestrian path, built on a widened box culvert structure with "median" level visual improvements {guardrail and wall surface i treatments). Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal 4,250 I S.F. ~ $ 300.00 S 1,275,00(1.00 G. of South Fra~ita~;e Road Total $ • • ,; EL[3PNIENT MASTER PLAN 1'~.GE 9-14 ~ . LIONSHEAD R.EDEV ' [AFTER ~ Ih+IPLEMENTATION Lionshead Parking Structure .~_ _,.,_, „ . ... 'hrs figure is f~rr the add' it o p king decks} to the existing parking structure. Mach new .eck will be able to accommodate approximately 440 spaces. It is assumed that the realigned nary to the parking structure will be a component of the Vail Civic Center project. In ddition, this parking deck would likely be associated with tl~e Civic Center project and ~auld not duplicate the construction of a West Lionshead parking structure. 'Quantity Unit Unit~Cost Subtotal . 400 1 Spaces ~ $ 22,540.40 ~ ~ 9,000,004.40 per additianai deck ~. Lionshead Parkin Structure Total ~~$ ~ 9,O~p,O(1(l.Ob . ti4'est Lionshead Parking Structure :'his figure assumes a 500 space below grade public parking space ire west Lianshead. This figure does not include potential ]and casts. It is possible that tl~e per space cost could be educed given mare creative financing scenarios such as a faint venture with the developer of he site. If the Vail Civic Center project is not built, it is likely that new parking in Vail s~ould ©ccur either an this site or an tl~e Lianshead parking structure. 'Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal ' 504 S aces $ 34,40x.00 ~ ~, 15,400,044.44 ~ . P West Lionshead Forking Structure Total $ ;15,04(1,QOf}.00 -~~_-, l nsportation Center ~ ~_..~_e ,.. . ..'~lransportatic~n center. This figure assumes the transportation center occurring an a ;tructurat deck above a service and delivery center. This figure includes aII necessary ;irculatian irnpravements and site improvements. ' Quantity Unlit Unit Cast ) Subtotal ~ ~.. . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..s. " ~ ~ ~;a4r~,4o~_00 ~ ~ ~ ~,4~4,4t~o.aa ~~ . ?. Lower level service and delivery facility. This figure includes all circulation and access mprovernents, internal functions, two freight e[evatars, one passenger elevator, and a below ;rode access corridor into the retail core. ' Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal ' 1 ~ L.S. + ~ ~,5I4,44o.44 '~ ~ 4,5I4,c~44.40 3. Arrival building. This figure includes all construction casts to full interior and exterior ~~ }Wish. ~ ,~~ ~~ Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal' 2,500 ~ S.F. ~ ~ 200.00 ~ $ ~ 504,000.04 ~. Roof far upper transportation center deck. This figure provides for a roof to the -ansportation center to address noise, visual, and actor concerns of tt~e surrounding ~sidential properties. Qu tity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal 000 ~ S.F. ~ $ 35..04 ~ $ 1, I 20,d~}0,0{I Transportation Center Total ~ Q ~ YY nn 111 nn /~ //~~ . .P 1V~SJ~iV~U.W~ >NSHEAD RED~VEI,C7FMENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 4~I S CE-tAPTER 9 71V1PLEM1INTATION K. West Lionshead Circle , 1. Primary pedestrian walkway improvements. This fiQUre includes all the primary pedestrian walks along West Lionshead Circle and associated site furnishings. lighting, and landscape improvements. Quantity Unit Unit Cost 1 Subtota[ 1,a5a ~ L.F. ~ 4~a.aa ~ ~ ~ 4'43,aaa.0a 2. Secondary pedestrian walkway improvements. This Figure includes a]1 secondary pedestrian walkways along West Lionshead Circle and associated site furnishings, lighting, and landscan itrtprove eats. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal ~ 1,550 L.F.. $ 300,00 ~ $ ~ 465,t)Qa,Oa 4. Resurfacing) reconstruction of West Lionshead Circle:, back of curb tc~ back cif curb. The changes to the intersection with Lionshead Place are included both in this figure and the ~~ Lionshead Place costs. ~ Quantity Uniit Unit Cost ~ Subtotal 1,sao 1 L,F: ~ ~ 35a,aa "i ~ ~~s,aaa.aa K. West Lionshead Circle Total 1,473,0(30.40 = _ ,.. - - L. Lionshead Place , 1. Primary pedestrian walkway improvements. This figure includes ali the primary pedestrian walks along Lionshead Place and associated site furnishings, lighting, and landscape im rovements. ~ ~ Quantity Unit Unit Cost J Subtotal l ,a~~ L.~. ~ ~ 4~a,a~ I ~ " a~ss,~~oa.oo . '~ 2. Secondary pedestrian walkway irnpravements. This figure includes ail secondary pedestrian walkways along Lionshead Place and associated site furnishings, lighting, and I landscape improvements. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal 3a0 ~ L.F. ~ $ 30a.aa ~ $ =9a,0a0.OQ . 3. Resurfacing/ reconstruction of Lionshead Place, back of curb to back of curb. Quantity Unit Unit Cost ~ ~ ~ Subtotal ` 450 I L,F. ~ ~ 35a.aa ~ $ 157,Sa0.aa , ,, . L. Lionshead Place Total 737.400.40 PA~~4-1G LIONSHEAD REDEV>~L1C7PMENT MASTER PLAN CHAPTER 9 IMPI..E1vIENTATtON ~ i12. Forest Road - - ~-- 1. This figure includes all pedestrian ulalks associated wtth the reconstruction of Forest Road i north of Gore Creek and assumes a '"secondary" pedestrian ~11a1k on both sides of the street. Quantity Unit Unit Cast Subtotal 1,20fl ~ L.F. ~ $ 300.00 ~ $ 360,000.00 ~ 2. Resurfacing/ reconstruction of Forest Raad. back of curb to back of cut•b. Quantity ~ Unit ~ ~ Unit Cost Subtotal t~Ofl L.F. ~ $ 350.00 M $ 210,000.00 ., ~ I M. forest Road Total. '~ 570,0()0.00 N. Gore Creek gecreation Path 1. Addition of new path segment (by-pass be]ow gondola). Tl~tis figure includes all path surfaces,. signage and landscape treatments. uantit Unit LTnif Cost Subtotal ~ 64fl, L.F. ~ $ 2oa.clo I $~` -i2s,oflo.~o . . Landscape enhancements along Gore Creels recreation path west of ski yard. This figure icludes all landscape treatments but does not include new path construction.. ~ Quantity Unit ~ Unit Cost 1,200 ~ L.F. M $ .~~ 300.00 N. Gare Creek Recreation Path Total d3. Nature/ passive recreation area 1. Footpaths. This figure includes alI potential f©otpaths w9tl~ Ai7A compliant surface and adjacent landscape restoration, as necessary.. This figure assumes that 60°lc of a[l trails (approx. 25001.f.) are surface and 44°10 boardwalked. The actual trail. length may vary greatly depending on actual community and Town of Vail goals for this area. Quantity Unit Unit Cost ~ Subtotal l,sao ~ L.F. ~ ~ ~o.aa ($ ea,floo.ao . 2, boardwalked paths. This cast includes all boardwa]k costs and associated site furnishings and interpretive signage. Quantity ~ [Jnit Unit Cost Subtotal 1,000, L.F. ~ $ 225.00 ~ $ 225,000.(30 . O. Nature/ passive recreation area 'T`otal y $ 2$5,000.00 • Subtotal $ 3b0,000.00 l.1dN5HEAD REDEVEL~P~,~tENT IvIASTER PLAN PAGE 9-I7 CHAPTER 9 I~iPLEA~IEI~ITATION P. Simba Run Undernacs This figure includes all improvements necessary for the construction of a vehicular 1-74 underpass connecting the South and North Frontage Roads near the Simba Run development. This number is based upon an older cost estimate adjusted for inflarion. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal I ~ L.S. ~ $10,400,400.00 I S 10.000,404.40 P 10,Oa4,a00.00 P. Simha Run. Under ass Total Q. V~'est Meadow Drive Connection This figure includes all primary and secondary pedestrian surfaces, lighting, sire fu~•nishings and landscaping associated with fine implementation of the Vail Streetscape ?Ulasterplan for West Meadow Drivc. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal . l ~ ~ i_.,.s. ~ ~ 2,s4o,oo0.44 ~ ~ z,so4,o40.44 Q. 'West Meadow Drive Connection Total $ 2,504,440.00 R. New Transit Technolo~v This figure is a general cost provided by the Vail Public Works Department for the implementation of a town wide "advanced technology" transit system. ~~ Quantity Unit 1 Unit Cost Suhtotal 1 M L.S. i $70,UOU,000.00 S 70.{)()0,000.00 R. New Transit Technology Total ~ ~ $ 74,0(}0,440.00 S. South Fronfa~e Road Rour~rl-a-linut - , This figure is an approximate cost based upon the main Vail and west Vai] round-a-bouts and includes all associated improvements. Q ~ Unit Cast Subtotal uantity Unit ~ ~ .•` er roccrzd-c~-ho' 1 ~ L.s. ~ z,o44.400.04 ~ ~ 2,044,444.04 ,~ , , ~r S. South Frontage Road Round-a-bout 'Total $ _ ..000,404.00 T. Replace Old Town ShonS ,5tora~e This figure is an approximate cost provided by the Town. of Vail Public Works Department to replace the current public works uses in the Old 1"own Shops. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal ., 1 ~ L.S. ~ 5 504.044.40 ~ 544,044.40 T. Replace Dld Town Shops Storage Total $ - _ SQ0,404,00 „ . ~N p~GE~_lg LIONSHp.AD REDEVELOPMENT 1VIA5TER PL CHAPTER 9 IMPLEMENT.~,TIQN L!C-NSHEAD IMPLEMENTATIQN CAST AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS Pu61ie Protects Revenue Sources fAe venues do not core SaurGe~ (Lis fed in tlrasing Penrod Projects Costs order o(PriorifyJ l.ow ~siimate ax Increment -~~ North day Lot -Transport Financing -Vole in - 5 years Center ,$ 1p.00D,DD0 Noverr~6er 011899 S 25,DOD,DDD Require developer pay Primary and Secondary for a portion of related Pedestrian Plazas S B.OOO,ODO of}-site impacts $ 3,000,000 implement a managed rowth agreement with Vail Assaaates and other developers to pay j East Lionshead Pedestrian far public Portal 5 1.50{1.00+0 imp((ove~nts Rental return on TdV owned property (based East Lianshead Service an $500,OD0- Area $ 560,ODD 3tmiUyear} 5 10,ODO,DDO Lionshead Place Caplaf Improvement W. Lionshead Circle $ 1,1 DO,DOD Futld Over 15 years S 2,DOD,000 The housing division Housing development an has reccomended the South face of parking creation of a 632p structure including partnership where pedes1riaNslreei housing would pay far improveme is ~ $ 5,000.000 itself $ d.000,ODD Gore Creek ecreauon Path (Can oC~r (per) $ 500,000 RETT $ 800,000 NaturelNassi4a r+e'alron Area {Can occur sooner) $ 30D,009 >_Sx3rsnd id COSSS! Nrgh gsiirnaie S 2S,Dp0,000~ d,f300.OD0 $ 20,OOD.000 5 t5,00D.000 5 4,DDO.DDD ~ aDD,oDD grants from State tar improvements t^ South Frontage Road Frontage lad. (Six r - 10 years Widening $ 11,ODO,ODO Years Out) S 599,000 $ 5,969,OD0 2nd TIF based On ff Realignment of S. development after Cora Frontar~e Road $ 4,Ofl0,00D l Site $ 25,000,G00 West Lionshead Parking- Slruclure if it )s needed oint venture ran attar utilizing Lionshead Parking Structure Strucutre $ 15,ODO,DOQQ which reduces cost S 5.000,000 § 9,000.000 Forest Road Ex~ttension I S 570,DDt3 ~ uonsnead raFlfrri~ Structure -new plate ~ $ 9,000,000 ww ears V il I y a Int®mational Fre Lane $ 171 DDO Grant tram C'[7®T far I 5imba Underpass S 10,DOO,DDO 5imba Underpass S tO.DOp.ODO $ iD.p00.000 ~ West Meadow drive slreetscape improvements S 2,500,OD0 TOTAL $ 79.201.400 5 fiD,30D,04D S 121,~OD,000 Timing Costs Revenue-Low Revenue-High 1-5 Years $ 26,96D,OOD S dd,S00,ODD S 72,L90,OOD 6-10 years S 39,570.000 $ 5,500,900 g 39.900000 10+ Years S 12,671.000 S 10,D00,000 $ i 0,000.000 ' TOTAL 5 79,2D1,DDD S 6D,30D-DOD $ 121,80D,DOD • LIQNSHE,~D REDEVELQPMENT IVIASTER PLAN ~ PAGE 9-19 GRAFTER 9 I1vtFLEIvIENTA' 9.5 I~1ext Steps The following critics] actions will set the stage far the implementation of the master plaai recommendations. 9.5.1 Joint Funding Agreements The Town of Vail should enter into a joint i`unding aQreeme~nt with Vail Associates and other development interests to ,share the costs of public improvements necessary to increase activity on. Vail lVlauntain and in Lionshead.. This action should be a high priority after adoption of the master plan. 9.5.2 R.ezaning Zoning districts and ]and use regulations relevant to the Lionshead study area should he updated and modified to reflect the recommendations contained in the master plan and facilitate their i2r~plementation. The rezoning process should include the creation of relevant i~r~pact fees drat would require development to contribute toward the funding of required frublic improvements associated with the developme~it. 9.5.3 Downtown Development Authority A downtown development authority (DDA) ar another appropriate TIF banding district should be established for purposes of funding public improvements in bout Lionshead and the Vail Village. The establishment of such a district should be considered a tap priority by the Taws of Vail anti should not be delayed by the currently ongoing 13roornfield TIF litigation. 9.5.4 Paring Anah~sis The Town of Vail should conduct an in~depth parking analysis in order to quantif;~~ parking demand and understand what revisions, if any, should be made to the existing parking code. 9.5.5 Employee Generation In accordance with ongoing efforts to prawide bath locals and employee lroousing in the Town of Vail, an employee generation ordinance is currently being pursued by the Vail 'T'own Council. PAGE9-20 LIONSHEAI~ REI~EVELCl1?I~LEI~IT MASTER PLAIy+ t A 1t 2 •+ ~~. ~ ~C t ~ ~c ~ =;c~ y~ v ~ ~~~~ r ~ . ~ ~~~~'~~ CC~~7 ~ ~ ccG~~r a~ fffff~ ,~ i c C ~ tti C ~.-'~ ~~ ~ ^~' r_` ~~ ~~ l ~ R.~ 4 Ci ~ o~ ar -~, ~ ~ t N~ k{~~ t3], -- :;. Z ~ '; ~ 4 ~~ ~ ~~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ -o u. ~- cS1 3 -~ ~ a ' ~ ~ ~ ~ N V '~ ~ D o- sy "~ ~ . ~ ~ ,) ., ~._._ :'r o o ~ ~ ~ , , ~ a i b ~~"' Q ~, ill. ~ ~~ ~ ~J ~.. r ! ~ `~' '~ . ~..,.._ -'> ~_ ~ ~ ~-, < ~ r~y.~+Vt Q ~" O ~ ,~ _ '~.__~ `' 7`- ~ fi +.~ ~{ ~ ~ - r ~--- ~^'~ ~' 'ma'r >r t` ~(r~ ~ ~ ~ (O W rb ~ 4 r ~- -- _ - ~`~` 1 ~~ ~ ~ '~' ~~ '~. ~! I 7* -(} A y _ _ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ) nl c ~ 0 3 ~ .,,~ ~ ~ ~~ Q ttj ~ eCn `a+ ~'~ acs. ~ z~ ~~ +J1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~~ ~ l._~ ~~ y !~ ~~ ~ ~~ r f~, !!!~~ p 3~ ~ t~ j ~~ t~1 N Q .~ a~~; F ~a 4w~: .. s L 0 o r ~-,~ s°~ ~' ~ r" ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~- ~ - ~ ~ c ~, C ti.. ~ ~ `~C"~' ~~ cf -~y r ` `x! ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~, ~ Z`~ ~1 • • s 1 ~~ / `~ • ~ ~ ,~. Q ''' ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ r'1 ~1 C~ ~ l` ~ T ~ ~ •- 3 '. 4 Q t0 ~a E9 L O ~, • L N ~ p. i a a ~ [a ~A ~~ 01 _~ r 4 V1 4 Yn • ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ £ ~ O ~ ~ o ~~ ~ ~ Q, ~, c .y ~ C U Q L ."' O_ O y i- .Cl [7 ~ ~ Q 3 Z ~, °' to ~ 47 O L ~ Q. ~ x ~' ~ ~Q ~ o Q v ~[ _ ~ ~~ O ~ 4 6 N U 41 f6 x `c ~ 4 G D ~~ ~~ ~_ c C p . C? C '3. .~ ~_' y 1 O1 6i __ C `w ~ t ' U1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7+ U ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ..C ~ 41 y ~ S ~ ,w fq t}~ ~ y_ ~ '~ ? .. ~ ai ~ '~ '© as •~ ~ ~ T 'fa ` S] ~ L ~ ,..9 a H ~ M .F ~ CS C p y~ L~ -,~ 41 Yi °~ a', c tL '~ ~ ~ `' Z o ,c ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ` ~ ~ Vic, Q 4 ~ m Q C ~ c `.. Q L~ fl w i ~~ 9~ ~~ -£ ~ ~ `~ ~ _.. C~ ~ o vi cu C ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~" O m E ~ ~ ~ ''~ _ ~~ ~ b 3 =~ a~ d ~~ o o E o~ m Q 1Z~i. ~ ~ ,~^ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~, ~ _ F G ^• ~ ~~. r{"Y o 4 N ~ ~ ,~ "^~ 1 k ~ ~ ~ U ~, ~ ~ ~ 5 a /-~ ~ ¢^ ~ ~ U _ ~~ i iY O O 4 'v } ~ \ C N ~ v ~ ~ Y ff ~ m z. ~ ~ : y ~ ~-' n li. Q_ _, ~ L D ~y~ a ~ c ~ ~ R •~ t'~. '~ w E U ~ '~, ~q: •v ~ ~ E ~ ~'c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v Q ~y~ p.~, ~ U ~ ~~ ^.~ /^+, 1 D ~ } J~ ~ ~~ 4 / Y d z£ ca C A k ~ ~ ~~ Y ~ o a E o. ~ f j~.~ ~ a t 7 `~ ' O m ~ i ~ ~ 'J ~~~~ ~~~ .a W ~~~~~ ~~ `, .~ ~ V` -.~^.~ N DS ~ -r 9 m c ~ ~ ~ ~ a~~'G 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ / C 7 tU d ,~ smi ~ C °~ ~ ~' O m r C " L O 4 -O Q OO QCS 0.~ w ~ ~ C " E-a~ca N ~ U ~ U L1-~. ~ a v+ "r £ 0) ~°' ; i Q ~ CT ~~s~ t ~` ~ r~ 9 r ~ O ;'. 47 ~ t.. ~~E~ 3 ~ Q ~ ~ G ~, ~ w' ~ ~ E ~ ~ G ~ C ~ a~~; y m O ~ ,u~ '~ o E ~~o LAY Q, `~ -~ E ~ ~E~ ~~~ m ~ U H .~ ~~~ O ~ =~ _ ~~~; ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~r ,,++ ~. 4 .~ r ° ''~" ~ ~ _ Q C r .~ ~ ~ O ,~ °' ~ 7i O +' cG ~ -;} "G , T Cy ' ur ~ p m ~ v. tD i ~ ~ c m ~ d r ~, ; ~ o ~ c E ~ ~ ~ E m ~ ~ }` Q, ~~E. o ~ > . ,. N s ~ ~, a C1~ ~ ~ ~~ v ~ ! ~ `,, ~ ~ W ,~.~" ~~,, O.. f a, c ° m ~ m S~ ~ `° c~ E c~ ~ E o °~ ~, ~ ~ U `~ ~ ~. ~' ~ as y ~ ~4 o°~c K ~ ~ o ~ i cu ~ gip. y ~ L E ~ ~~~ 0 N ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ c- ~'"9 ~ ~° ~ c o ~ E v :~, ~ o ~;, ~~ o~~'~.- ~ ~E~ I ~~~~~a 7- ~ ^G ~ "" a -,~ ~ v m >cc~'.=a O~' ~ ~~o ~cc • +~~a=ff r '~ ~ W 4 a~ - ~'.~ ~' o " a ca. ~, 1D >- ..- a ~~ ~.. ~ , r a. ~~ ~, ~ ss 97 Y ~_ ~ ~ Q ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~t Q ~ G W d) "~ = ~i.• c O ~~ ~o ~_ c ~ ~ L ~ y o.r~> ~ ~ ~ ~^ Z `~~~,~ F o~«~S'~ . .r~mo ~.-.J ~~ zz c~ o~ >~ ~z ~`~ ~!_~ d ;~~ u~ h. ~~ _~ Q (fir ~Z ~~ $4 e } a O a 6 z I, 0 2 ~~ 0 ~~ tb 3 a D F W W 'o d a ~ ,n z°~ ~ i >- ~ ~' a c~ a ~ a ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ N ~ 2 ~ ~ w 7` T ~ ~ u7 W r r $ ~ 1z z _ ~` 6)' ~ C q C L '~ ~ J1 `, d ~ u~fl ~ p ~ V w ~ o ~ o ~ ~S d CY ~ -~ Cp "~` ~ ~ N ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H z w W p C7 D w V rjj W Z g D ~_ _ ~ z ¢ ~, ~ D 2LL Z DW a w m ~D ¢ rwn~ ~ a U U. O h Z Z 2w DF= m ~~ Q zQ W ~ avi ~w O a~ W O_ c,7 U DU .Z mVi W aQ ~~ ~~ ~ti 6 ~ZW ~. 7` a° F D r, a Z .~ pU t F a O T I r 0 d a Cfl ~. a w r fl 2 N 0 } O Z ~ L7 O ~ z ~ m y= ~ U OW Q ~° W ~o ~ z 4 {~ .~ Q d ti O ~s Q a ~ r ~ (~l ~ O 2 ~ ~° z T 0 f_ .~ tin qi 7 ~- w T Z O ~~ .~ eil 0 0 Z W r Y~ _~ a z ~ z 0 a ~~ 0 z 0 0 z ~ z 7 T ~~ O 0 't1 -~ f Q .~ Q 0 ~Q .~ i '~O a Z ~~ O 0 a 0 z 0 x T _~ `~ z }d IL Q W Q o LLh D ~ h~ ~ S~ 2 Zw 4v, Q U^ ~ y W h W W ~ Imo' ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ D ~ p ~ 7W Z m a~ ¢~ z h~ zet L3~ ~w 4~ h ILL-W WU ~~ ~Q LLZ 7 D~ hw ~~ DLL ~7 t7 art >~ vDiH Q~ S2 oY"c o- ~ ~ i c o l i .. E ~' ~ ~ i ~~ ° a a a c ` m i ~ ~ ° d ~ ! [~~ }y7 Ll O y 1r o z O ~ V th { ~ o ~ u'v ~4v I~ > . E~ C {6 ~ I~ .a ~ {/~ l~ L ~ O ~ d Q E c v O ~ I ,E . m ~ a~ 4 m ~ ~~ ~ ~ fl Q M ~ c m E N T j al C ,.. ~ ~ 'm ® c` ° v o ~- r ~ „ ,. -. I - ~ - Y~~ o ~~cou E ~ ~ ~ rn ' . - - Q ~ ~, c m P~ O ~ ~ + . ~+ . f n '~ m X ~ W ~ y ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ i L _ ~~ a - >~°~ ~ = flEE~ , ~ ~ ro ~ i t ~ o ~s~a ~'~~ :~ 7 ~ . . ~ iw N ~' ~ r C ~ E ~ Y E w °uwa I v ~ I o ! > ~ ~ ~+ 6 ~ «, y y ~ C ~ ~ W ~ = ~ C ~ . J rm ~ 4 ~ ~ .. Q Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n o~ d~ ~~ ~~ Zy ~ W ~ w Q y rt = • • i •~ ~ ~ ~ ~tfi ~ ~ ~ ~~E ~.• 7` ", G , ~Y `° ~,rY ~ ~ ' Q~ E~ C 9 O C ~~ ~ Gvi Q U N `~ ~ ~Y ~~ ua m U C C 4 J~ °~ L ~ o mY U O .~ U mar m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r' a i N 4 3 ~" R] ~ ~ ~+ O T C ~_ C O ~ U o ~ is O D ni L ~ ~_ H ~ E m ~ a c ~ r [ ~ ~ ` ~ c -_ C ~ L ?? .~ J ` C Y ° U s ~ C ~ a C cl H " D 'C7 tc p U ~ j ~ -~' '~.. j- s 3~ ~ dl 'n ~! '~' C, ~~-`~ .~ ~~~ x ~I -+ ~~ ~~ ~--a~ ,~ ~r'lr 4a~ ion Zr'~1."' A ,~ a ~/ ~~,~}_ ~~ ~ ! ~ \~~y-T~ 1(~~~~ ~~ _~ 7 ~~ ~o Z~ ~~ '7 Z AA4~ 1~i Q 0 s 4 a Q x Q 7 ~ C ~ O a .~ -~ ~ 4. '" ~-• ~ ~ ~ ~ r o o L~ ` {1 '^ as ' ro ~a_ V ep y ~ v O L c7 .mil o car E _ ~ -p - /(-~1 ti~ p C LS. N m C ~ ~~ ~~ ~ O y .~ O ~ i ~ rm ~ U x ~ v 4 G~ 1 /~~\~~ fp i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v h-~ ~ ~~ ~ C - C ~ d7 ~ D 4 U m - ~ ~ ~ a E E~ ~`° sco~ 1~ ~ ~ +~ m "' m +.' +d ~ ,~ y N ° o ~L N ~ o.Q ~ ~ ~ v~ E o~ E a E E C O _ ~ 4 ~O S] U 'O 47 j l` t a 3 A ;' m ? i ~' E ~ . 3 'C ~ ~ +u L ~ a so ~' ~ c o ~ ~ o m ~ ~ ;~ ~ E ~ '. E ~ - - e 0 o U O yr _ ~ p, ~ a as +° ~ .. e R "' L 9 U7 U] O US .~ 'O c Q O ~ ~ U ~-~.~ , ~-7.~1 ~~~~ r-- ~, A e~ -_ ~ +_ '~ ~ ~ ~ °~ ~ U E w e L q U .D U tti ~ m C. v ~ t9 L C- ~, ~~o .~ ~~ ~~ L ..J ~ O -,~ ..~, ~ m Q C ~ _ ~ eo ~ 7 a~ C N ~ __ ca ~ O ~ . A C C _ - ~ ~ 7 ~ w= ~ ? C ~ ~ tp ~ U a ,- ,~ti f ~ ~ _.O ~ ~ ~1 ~ ] ~ ~ '-~ ~ O In } C ~ ~ ~ }~ ~ •~ ~ ~ O L:~ L C~ t ~ iii ~ Q (4 ~ a) d 'Z ~-. ~ ~ ~ ?~C' Q `n l C ~ ~ ~ F c . ~Se T ~. ~ C~ ~,,~~ -~ `` ~R ~~ L ~ ~~~ ~. 3 `'~ a of ~ T N~~" al " ~ C7" s • ~~ ~~ ,~~a~` ~~ c ~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~ ~~ ~ Q i 'Z! 7 L ~.. ~I Z ~ ~ ~~ Q ~ ~,o "~ ~ o ' ~ v~ _~ ~ ~~ 1L '~ o o ~' O ~,~,~~~ ~, .U c m ~ ~i~d~~~~ 7 7 3 .~ ~ 0 D .o ~ ~ m ~% E a ,_ O r N = 'O 7 ~ fO ~ c6 Y pU ~ aXi ~~ '~~ ~ 7- ~l~_ .~, ~ } L,~J~ as ` O , a ~ ~ ~ E *' c Q °- m N ~, a `4 ~ E m O D p 'v C ~ ca ~ m w~ fl V Q~ O ..y- 9) Q ~~ Q ~~ 0 Q ~ ~ v Go ~ O C ~ e5 C ?. O E ' ~ ~ r~0 N ~ ~ ~ Q- d C p y .a N ~ g3 ~ ~y p ~_ .an p ~, ~ ~ p ~, ~ E G O '_' ~ E O d ~,.-° ~ ~H:" E~ ~. ~~ ~~~ ` ~~ ~/ .~ ~ N ~ ,, P ~ m~'Jl T ~ ~ ~ °' p ~ ~ _ A ~ vi C ~ p :~' N 4w,1[r ,p ~ ,Q aj ~ ~ `p ~ ~ - ?~ p ~ m ~ "' 'p - U C «_ ~ ~ c ~ ~ p a f ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ E L ° c °7 67 m _~ ++ N p " m 0 H N Q1 U Z ~ v C~ G W ~~ c C'~ rte. _/ c ~ t cC,~„~ , c ~' G C ~~ rte'' ~~ x` ~ ~, f~7 . ~ ~- t ~~ ~~~ ~- ~~ ~~ ~ ~ L O T ~ N G1 ~ N ~ ~ ~•-' n~ c ~ C ~' > O a~ ~ ro ~Q~ _ ~ ~ ~ O ~_ ~ ~ " '~ ~ ~ N a J p ~-Q Q H ~ o U ~ p ~ U N E~ ~ ~ v o f ~ p ~, ~ E E .`_ 4 w s a ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ o ~ ~ '~ E r~ { lY • '~• ~-• ~+ p j - ~ ~ ~` o ,~ ~- L ~ ~< ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ o ~~~~ ~ ~ .L ~ ~- ~- a~1 Z ~_ C~ 3~~ '~~d~ -~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~- i_ __ _ _ ~~_-~ _ ~.r- ~ ~ • ~ >. ..~ «° .~ y.. p as .~ Q = ~ O >- ~ i p ru iv y N. 3 ,> 'a ? 'uo «% a y. ra Z W N 7 ~n ~ p U N N per} /~i 'f' ~ ~ to G~7 p .Q ~ ' ; 4~ ~ O " r- t9 ~ Q a ~ _~ Q, o E a o c ~ ~ -R ~' ~ va ~ ~ c .1 7 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w d E ~~ ~ ~~a< t-~ o m~ a z~~ ~W ~ c ~ Q Z - 6, ~ ay a~ ~, r c4 `m r. ao ~ ~ lC7 [C} r 1] m d OL? r" pp ~ v o.. E w ~ ~ ~ N D : ~ ~ ~ ~, E ~ .` . y ~ ~ . p r.. Q? ~ E L 7 rJ1 ~ ~ .L. IO ~ ~ ' ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ / _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~) ~~ ~ ESE ~~E ~ EL ca~Q °i~ A `~' a r°oc ~ .1 'D ~ b ~ ~ L3 ~ ~ w v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r Q ao -N p {`.~ ~y w ~ `2 Rlanning and Environmental Commission ~- -. , ~.~ ACTION FORM T _~~ `~ Department of Gammunity Development 1 ll YV~~~ ~~ ~'~~~ ,~ 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 816.57 tei:970.479.2139 fax: 974.479.2452 web: www.c9.vail.co.us Project Descriptian: Participants: OWNER W&B DEV LLC 01J25/2002 Phone: 3 ESSEX RD SUMMIT NJ 07901 License: APPLICANT Jay Peterson 01/25/2002 Phone: 476-0092 Project Name: W & 6 Development, LLC PEC Number: PEC020002 Duplex Subdivision Review Bailey & Peterson 108 S. Frontage Rd. West #210 Vail, C© 81657 License: Project Address: 381 BEAVER DAM CR VAIL Location: 387 Beaver Dam Circle Legal Descriptian: Lot: 1 Black: 4 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 3 Parcel Number: 210107111001 Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: 5TAFFAPR Second By: Vote: Date of Appro~aL D2J07J20D2 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN}: No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail stai'f and/or the appropriate review committee{s). Plannew George Ruther PEC Fee Paid: $10DA0 C7