HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-0812 PEC
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PIJBLIC NQTICE
NQTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
~ Vail will hald a pubfic hearing in accordance wi#h Section 12-3-6 0f the Municipal Code of #he
Town o# Vail on August 12, 2002, at 2:00 P.M. in #he Tawn af Vaii IVlunicipal Buifding. In
consideratiora af:
A request for a variance frem Sectian 12-68-6 (Setbacks), Vail Town Code, to aflow for a
garage encroachment in #he rear setback, located at 5167 Gare CirclelLot 12, Block 3, Bigharn
SuFadivision 5"' AdcfitiQn.
Applicant: RaHand S. Hamelin
Planner: Nlatt Gennett
A request for a finai review and reeammendations of the foilowing applications rela#ed to the
propased redevelopment of the VaiC Mountain School:
1) A request far a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to rezone 3010 Booth Falls
Road/Lat 11, Bloclc 2, Vail Village 12'h Filing from Tvua-Family Residentiai to General
lJse;
2} A request for a recommendation tp the Vail Town Council to Zone Lot 12, Block 2,
Vail Viilage 12`h Filing to General Use, The northem porkion of this lot is zoned
Agriculture Open Space;
3} A request for a recommendation ta the Vail Town Council to rezone Tract C, Blvck 1,
Vail Village 'f 2t" Filing from Twa-Fami6y Residential ta General Use;
4} A request for a recommendation to amend the official Town af Vail Land Use N'lap for
Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 1Z' Filing from Law Density Residential to PublicfSemi-
Public;
5} A request fioe an arnendmen# to the previously appraved development plan and a new
~ conditional use permit for a private educational institution and an active outdoor
recrea#aon area on 3010 Baoth Falls Raad/Lot 11, Block 2, Vail Vil9age 12Ih Filing and
3160 M. Frontage Raad Eastl Lot 12, 61ock 2, Vai! Village 92" Filing;
6) A request far a conciitional use permit to allow far the canstruction af eight Type III
EHUs {ocated on Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filing;
7} A 6equest for a for a conditianal use permit to alEow for temporary modular classrdom
structures kaGated at 3160 N. Frontage Rd. EasU a part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village
12th Filing;
8} A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to madify the official Town
' Of'~~~1~ rZlfCKie~~ "ie~di~i ~vi~P? iu iiiUlGai~ cipE.iil7li~~v'C~ tillilcJ~.ai;iii'! i0i" J i~i0 FI-Caiii+g@ '
x r-• r-. i-.._i. . ,I~-'i. r:EIf.-.. anm s-:n;.......
: kJC..3f LVl 1~~lIV'V? 4~:11is.A TL3~r4~v, e.+iVVI". 1 , W+.x I.~.'~ I~a
9) A request for a major subdivision in accordance with Title 13, Chapfer 3, Vai! Town
Code, and ssfting forth details in regards thereto, located at Lots 11 and 12, Block 2,
Vail Village 12Ih Filing ancf Tract C, Bfr~ck 1, Vail Uillage 12`h Filing.
ppplicant: Vail Mountain School, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Russ Forrest
A request for a minor amendment ta Special Developnment District Na. 6, to allaw for an expansion
of commerciaf uses into common area, located at 123 S. Frontage Rd. WesULQts M,N, &0, Vail
Viliage 1~t Filing.
Applreant; Club Chelsea, represented by JMP Archutects
Pianner: Warren Carnpbefl
~
*VAIL
T4WN -
A request for a fnal review of afinal plat for a majar subdivisian, a request for a final revtew of a
conditianal use permit tfl allow for a prEVate educational institutian and development plan approval
to construc# emplayee hausing; and setting far#h details in regards thereto, lacated af the site ~
known as "Nlountain Beil"/an unpiatted piece of property, lacated at 160 M. Frontage Rd.Ito be
pEatted as Lot 1, Middle Creek subdivtsion.
Applicant: Vail Local Housing Authorbty, represented by C7dell Archatects
Planner: A11ison Ochs
A request for a conditional use perrnit, to allaw for a Public utility installation, Iacated at ttre East
Vai1 Water 7ank, 5004 Snowshoe Lane/Summer Recreational Area, Vail Meadows Filing 1.
Applicant: Town af Vail
Planner: E3ill Gibson
A request for a recvmmendation ta the Vail Town Council ta of an amendmenf to Section 12-7A-7
(Height), Vail Tawn Code; to increase the maximum alfowabie builciing height in the Public
Accommoda#ian Zane District.
Applicant: Bob Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: George Ruther
The appficatians and infarmatian about the prapasals are available for public inspectiQn during
regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community
Devekapment Qepartment, 75 South Frontage Road. The pubiie is invited to aftend project orientation
and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development
Deparkment. Please ca11479-2138 for infarma#ion.
Sign fanguage interpretatian available upon request witfn 24-hour notifieation. Please call 479- ~
2356, Telepheane far the Hearing Impaired, far informatiQn.
Community Deuelopment Department
Published July 26, 2002 in the VaiE Daily.
, . . . . . . . , _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ Y _ . _ _
~ .
~
2
PLANNIMG AND ENVlRONMENTAL GOMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING 11
Monday, Augus# 12, 2002
PROJECI' URIENTATION Gornmunifiy Development Dept. PUBUC WELCOME 91:30 am
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visits : 12:30 pm
1. East Vail Water Tank - 5004 Snowshoe Lane
1, Hamelin residence - 5167 Gore Circle
2. Vail Nltn. Schoof - 316E1 N. Fr4ntage Rd.
3. Cfub CheIsea - 123 S. Frontage Rd.
4. M;ddle Creek 160 N. Frontage Rd.
Driver: George
WD
NaTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30
Public Hearinq - Tawn Gouncil Charrabers 2.00 pm
0 1. A request for a variance from Sectian 12-66-6 (Setbacks), Vail Town Code, to allow for a
garage encroachment in the rear setback, located at 5167 Gore Circke/Lot 12, Blocfc 3,
Bighorn Subdivisian 5Ih Addition,
Applicant: Rolland S. Hamelin
Planner: Ma#t Gennett
2. A request for a conditianal use permit, #o allaw for a public utility insfallation, located a# the
East Vail Water Tanic, 5004 Snowshoe LanelSummer Recreationa9 Area, Vail Meadvws
Fiiing 1.
Applicant: 7own of Vail
Planner: Bil! Gibson
3. A request fof afinai review and recommendations of the following applications related to
the proposed redeveVopment af the Vail Mountain 5chool:
1} A request far a recorrtmendation ta the Vail Town Council ta rezone 3010 BQOth Falls
Road/Lot 11, BMock 2, Vail Village 12t" Filing from 7wo-Family Residenfial #o Genera{ Use;
2} A request for a recommendatian to the Vail Town Council to rezone a portion of Lot 12,
Biock 2, Vail Village 12t'' Filing from Agriculture & Open Space ta General Use;
3} A request for a recornmenda#ion ta the Vail Tawn Couneil ta rezone Tract C, Block 1, Vail
Village 12f" Fifing from Two-Family Residential to General Use;
4) A request for a recomrnendation to amend the official Town of Vail Land Use Map for
Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12t" Filing from Louv Density Residen#ial to PubliclSemi-Public;
~
Ta$ vN
41EL
~ 5) A reguest for an amendmen# ta the previousfy approved developmen# plan and a new
conditional use permit for a priva#e educatinnal institution and an ac#ive outdoor recreation
area at 3010 E3ooth FaEls Road/Lot 11, Block 2, Vail Village 12'" Filing and 3160 N. Frontage
Road EasU Lat 12, B4ock 2, Vai6 Village 12`h Filing; S
6) A request for a carrditional use permit to allo+nr for the construction of eight Type III EHUs
loca#ed at Tract C, B{Qek 1, Vail Village 12'h Filing;
7) A request for a conditional use permit to allow for temporary moduiar classroorri
~ structures located at 3160 N. Frontage Rd. East/ a part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12'n
Filing;
8} A request for a recammendatFan to the Vail Town Council to amend the Ufficial Town of
Vail Rockfall Hazard Map to inciicate approved mitigation for 3160 N. Frcantage RoadlLo# 12,
Block 2, ane! Tract C, Block 1, Vail 11illage 12th Falfing;
9} A request for a final review of a preliminary plat for a major subdivisian in accordance
with Title 13, Chapter 3, Vail Town Code, and setting forth detaiEs in regards thereto, located
at Lots 11 and 12, Black 2, Vail Viilage 12rh Filing and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12th
Filing.
Appficant: Vail Moun#ain Schoal, representad by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: P.uss Forrest
4. A request for a recommendation to the Vaii Town Cauncil to of an amendment to Sectian 12-
7A-7 (Height), Vaii Town Code, to increase the maximum allowabee building height in the Pubiie
Accommodation Zone Distric..
Applicant: Bob'Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner; George RutherlWarran Campbell
5. A request for a final review af afinal plat for a majar subdiv'rsion; a request for a final reuiew of a
conditional use permit to allow for a private educational insQitutic+n and development plan ~
approval to construct employee housing; ancC setting farth details in regards thereto, 4ocated at
the site fcnown as "h!{ountain Bell"lan unp{atted piece vf property, located at 160 N. Frontage
RdJto be platted as Lat 1, Middie Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Uail Local Hausing Authority, represented by Odell Architects
Planner: Allison Ochs
8. A request for a recammendation to the Vail TQwn Council to amend the Donovan Park
Master Plan and a request for a final review af an amendment for the previQUSly appraved
deve[opmen# plan, to aliow for the construeiion of the Donavan Park PaWilion, located at
1600 S. Fron#age Rd. West/Unplatted aonovan Park.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by VAg, Inc.
Pianner: George Ruther
7. ' A request for a minor amendment to Special aevelapment Distric# No. 6, ta allow for an
expansion of eommerciaf uses into cammon area, located at 123 S. Frontage Rd. West/Lats
M,N, &O, Vail Vi9lage 1'' Filing.
Applicant: CFub Gheisea, represented by JMP Architects
Planner: 1Narren Campbell
Staff Approvals
VML LLC PEC02-{}011 George ~
Final review of townhouse F'lat Review
285 Bridge StreetlVarl Mountain Lodge, Vail Village 15i F[ling
Applicant: VML 1.LC, represented by Bailey & Peterson
2
i
7. Approvaf af July 22, 2002 minutes
~ 8. Informatian Update
The applacatFOns and infarmation about the propvsals are aWaifable for public inspection during
regular office hours an the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Cammunity
Develapment Departrraent, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretatian available upon request with 24 hour notificatian. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing impaired, for informa#ion.
Community Developmen# Departrnent
Pubiished August 9, 2002 in the Vail Daily. ;
I
~
,
e
i
~
~
~
0
~
~
3
PLANNING AND ENVIROMMEhJTAL COMMISSlON
~ PUBLfC MEETING RESUL.TS
Monday, August 12, 2002
PROJECT ()RIENTATIaN Community Development Qept. PUBLIC WELCOME 11:30 am
MEME3ERS PRESEN7 NkEMBERS ARSENT
Jahn Schofield Chas Bernhardt
Erickson Shir{ey
Doug Cahial
George Lamb
Rollie Kjesbo
Gary Hartman
Site Visits : 12.30 pm
1. East Vail Water Tank - 5004 Snowshoe Lane
1. Hamelin residence - 5167 Gore Circie
2. Vail Mtn. Schooi - 3160 N. Frontage Rd.
3. Club Chelsea - 123 S. Frontage Rd.
4. Middle Creek 160 N. Frontage Rd.
Driver: George
NQTE: If the PEC hearing extends untii 6:00 p.m., the baard may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30
Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm
1. A request for avariance frorn 5ection 12-6E3-6 (Setbacks), Vail Tawn Code, to allaw for a
garage encroachment in the rear se#back, located at 5167 Gore Circie/Lot 12, Block 3, Bighorn
Subtiivision 5t" Adciition.
Applicant: Rolland S. Hamelin
Planner: Matt Genne##
MOTION: Doug Cahi{! SECOND: Gearge Lamb VOTE: 6-0
APPRQVED
2_ A reques# for a conditianaf use permif, to allow for a public utility installa#ion, lacated a# #he East
Vail Water Tank, 5004 Snowshoe LaneISummer Recreatianal Area, Vail Meadows Fifing 1.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner; Bill GibsoR
NI(7TIOhJ: DQUg CahiVi SECOND: Roliie Kjesbo VDTE: 6-0
~ TABLE UNTIL SEPTEN'IBER 4, 2002
~
.
1 ra~IN oF vnrL
.
3. A request for a fnal review and recommendatians af the fo6lowing applications re(ated to the
proposed redevelopment of tYre Vail Mounfain School:
1) A requesf for a recommendatian to the Vail Tawn Cauncil to rezane 3010 Baoth Falls ~
Road/Lot 11, Block 2, Vail ViPlage 12t" Filing from Two-Famiiy Res'rdential to General lfse;
2) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council ta rezQne a partian of Lo# 12, Block
2, Vail Viflage 12th Filing from Agricufture & Open Space to General Use,
3) A request far a recommenda4ion to the Vail Tawn Councal to rezone Tract C, Block 1, Vail
VilCage 12"' Filing from Twa-Family Resident9al tp General Use;
4) A request for a recommendation to amend the off4cial Tawn of Vail Lanct l3se Map for Tract
C, Block 1, Vail Village 12t'' Filing from Low Density Residentiai to PueblicfSemi-Pubiic;
5) p'request far an amendment to the previously approved clevelopment plan and a new
canditional use permit for a private educatianal institution and an active outdoor recreatian area
at 3010 Booth Falls RoadlLoi 11, Siock 2, Vail Village 12th Filing and 3160 N. Frontage Road
East/ Lot 12, Biock 2, Vail Vil{age 12" Filung;
6) A request for a conditional use permit to allow far the cons#ruetion of eight Typa lil EHLfs
locateci at Tract C, BJock 1, Vail Village 12`n Filing;
7) A requss# for a conditional use permit to allow fpr temparary modular classrQOrri structures
Iocated at 316{} N. Frontage Rd. Eas#/ a part o# Lat 12, Block 2, Vail Viilage 12'h Filing;
8) A request far a recammendation to the Vail 7own Courvcil to amend the Official Tawn of Vail
Rockfail F{azard Map to indicate approued mitigation far 3160 N. Frontage Raad/Lot 12, Slock
2, and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Uillage 12th Filling;
9) A request for a final review of a prelirrainary plat far a majar subdi+rision in accordarrce with
Title 13, Chapter 3, Vail Town Code, and setting forkh details in regards thereto, cocated at Lots
11 and 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12"' Filing and Trac# C, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filing.
Applicant, Vail Mountain Schaol, represented by Braun Associates, ?nc.
Planner. Russ Forres1
hJIOT1QN: Erickson Shirley SECC}ND: Rollie KjesEao V'(]TE: S-D-'I (Lamb recused)
APP62QVAL REZONING 3010 BOOTH FALLS/LO7 11, Bl.OCK 2, FROM 2-FAMILY TO ~
GENERAL USE VtiJITH THE FINDINGS IN 7HE S7AFF MEMCDR4ND4JAll.
MOTION: Erickson Shirfey SECQND: Roliie Kjesbo VQTE: 5-0-1 (Lamb recused)
APPROV'AL REZON6NG LOT 12, BLOCK 2 FROM AGRICULTURE OPEN SPACE 1`O
GENERAL USE WfTH THE FINQlNGS IN TF#E STAFF MEN10RANQUM.
MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECOIVD: RolCie Kjesbo VOTE: 5-0-1 (Lamb recused)
APPRiOVAL REZONING TFiACT C F'RC)M 2-FAMILY TG+ GENERAL USE WlTH THE
FINDINGS aN THE STAFF MEMORANDUM.
MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECOND: Gary Hartrnan VOTE:5-0-1 (Lamb recused)
APPRQVA?L AMElVDING THE HAZARD lIIIAP W ITH THE CRITERIA ON PAGE 21 C)F THE
STAFF MEMC?RANDUM.
MO71QN: Erickson Shirley SECOND: Rollie Kkesbo VOTE:5-0-1(Lamb recused)
APPROVAL AMENQING THE C)FFICIAL LANQ USE MAP FOR TRAC`f' C FRGM LOW
DENSI7Y RESlDENTIAL TO PIJBLIClSEh111-PUBLIC W1TH THE FINQINGS ON RAGE 12-13
l7F THE STAFF MEMORANDUM.
MQTIDN: Erickson Shirley SECOND: Gary Hartman VOTE:5-0-1 (Lamb recused) •
APPROVAL DEVEL4PMENT PL,4N AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH THE
FINDINGS OBV FAGE 19 AND THE CONDITlC7NS LISTED BELaW,
2
MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECOND: aoug Cahill VO7E:5-0-1{1_amb recused}
~ APPRQVAL CUNDITIONAL USE PERMIT FC)R TYPE II1 EMPLOYEE HC]USING UN1TS
Wi7H THE FINDINGS ON PAGE 79 AIVD THE CONDITIC)NS LISTED BELfJW.
MOTION: Daug Cahill SECC7N[3: Rollie Kjesbo VOTE:5-0-1(Larrtb recused)
APPRC3VAL C4NDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE TEMPORARY MOQl1LAR CLASSRQUM
STRUCTURES WI fH THE FINDINGS !N THE STAFF MEAAORANDUM AND 7HE
CONDITfONS LISTED BELOW.
APPROVED CONDITIC)NAL USES WITH 13 CONDlTIONS:
1. The appficant shall pravide the Town of Vail with an easement for the
existing public bus stop at the southwest corner of the property prior fo
building permit submiftal.
2. The applicant shalf provide the Tawn of Vail with drainage easements in
accordance with the proposed grading and drainage plans. These
easernents shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate
of occupancy or certificate of oecupancy far any prappsed development on
the site.
3. Prior to the issuance of a Temparary Certificate of Occupancy or a Certificate
of Occupancy far arry phase of the schaol, #he appMicant shafl caenpiete and
~ receiwe a Certif cate of Occupancy for the eight erriployee housing units
constructed on TEact C except for the occupancy of the cabin.
4. All housing units on Tract C shall be deed-restricted as Type ill employee
housing units. These units must be constructed in conjunctian with the
approved deveBopment plan. Required Type II! deed-resfrictions shall be
recorded by the applicant with the Eagle Counfy Glerk Record€r prior ta the
issuance of any temporary certificate of occupancy or certificate of
occupancy far development of the schaol. The employee housing units shall
comply with the minimum requirements for Type 111 employee housing
regulations, as defined in Ghapter 12, of the Vail Town Code.
5. 7he bicyc6efpedestrian path shall be constructed by the applicant as per the
approved develapment plan. Construction shail be campleted prior to
receiving a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for phase 19 of the School
which wiil include the food seruice facilities and gymnasium. If phasing does
not accur on tfhe project then the path sMall be compaeted before occupancy
is granted far the schaol. An easement shall be proWided to the Tower of Vail.
by the applieant for the bike/pedestrian path prior ta the issuance of a ;
building permit. The applicartt must submit a staging pEan and have that plan ~
approved by the Town of Vail that would allow pedestrian access acrass the
j
site from Katsos Ranch Road to Booth Falls Road during all phases of
canstruc#ion. ;
!
~
3
6. The administrator, at his discretion, snall require eE#her a cash deposit, bond,
ar letter of credit to be submitted to tha Tawn of Vail by the applicant prior to
the issuance of any building permits f4r 100% of the value of creating a biPce ~
pathlpedestrian trail for the entire length of Tract G, Block 1, Vail ViPlage 12th
Filing of the same guality and width as the path specified in condition number
5 abave and more specifically described in the Develvpmen# Plan. If the
Tawn of Vail daes no# Cornplete a bicyele trail on this property wifihin 5 years
from thE date of the 'rssuance of a building permit, the Town shall refund this
depasit.
7, Approval of the conditional use permit for the development plan is
Ganditioned upon the rezoning of Lots 12 and 11, Black 2, Vail ViOlage 12th
Filing to the General Use District and approval of a final plat.
8. The canditianal use permat for the modular structures shalE be nulk and void
two years from the approval of the conditional use permit for the two modular
s#ructures. This conditional use permi# is vasid only for the current number of '
modular strUCtures as of the date of this approval. Ti he applicant can
propvse a change in locatian to the rnQClular structures and submit aDRB
applicatian for the new location of the mfldular structures within 8 months of
~
ihe approval of this conditional use permit.
9. The Vail Mountain School shall nat use any public right of way far parking.
~
10. A debris flow berm should be designed and constructed prior the iacation of
the cabin on the no€thern portion of lot 12. Aqualified engineer oe geQlogist j
shall conclude in a wrFtten letter to the Gommunity Development Departmenf
that the berm will adequately protect the cabin from a debris flaw with out ~ i
adversely impacting priuate or public praperty.
11. The applicant shafl verifiy with a qualified IPghting expert that lurninance for a[I
types of exteriar lighting do not exceed 125. The applicant shall submit a
report #o the Tovun that the lighting complies with the Town's developmen#
standards, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certif+cate of Occupancy.
12. The applicant shall submit revised dewelopment plans to the Town identifying
adequate snmw starage for the north parking area and the parking area for
Tract C prior to the issuance of final Design Review Board approval.
13. The applicant will move the Bus Shekter to the north side of the bus lane to a
loeation in accordance with the Public V1/orks Department. The Bus lane and
shelter shall be maintained thraughaut construct9on of the praject.
MOTIOIV: Doug Cahifl SECOND: Gary Hartman VOTE:5-0-1(Lamb recused)
APPROVAL RRELIIVIINARY PLAT FOR THE MAJQR SUBDIVISiON WITH THE FiNaI1VGS
QN PAGE 26-27 1N THE STAFF MEMC3RANDUM ANQ TWO CONDITIGhJS:
1. Within one year of #he Planning and Environmental Commission's apprauaC,
the appficant shall submit a final p4at to the Department of Community
Development for review by the Planning and Enviranmental Cornmission.
2. Prior #o submitting a#inal plat the applicant shall address all comments of the ~
reviewing agencies ta the satisfactiQn of the said agencies. Any comments
shall be incorporated into the fnal plat.
4
4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council ta of an amendmen# to Section 12-
7A-7 (Height), Uail Town Code, ta increase the maximurrr allawable buikding height in the Rublic
~ Accammodation Ztane District.
Applicant; Bob Lazier, represented by Jay Pe#erson
Planner: George RutheriVllarren Carnpbel]
MOT1ON: Daug Cahill SECOND: George Lamb VOTE: 6-0
TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 26,2002
5, A request for a final review of a final plat for a major subdivision; a request for a final reWiew of a
conditional use permit #a alEow for a private educational institution and development plan ~
approval to construct empaoyee housing; and setting forth details in regards thereto, loeated at
the site known as "Mountain Bell"!an unplatted piece of property, located at 160 N. Frontage
Rd.lto be platted as Lat 1, Alfiddle Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Vail Local Housing Autharity, represented by Odell Architects
Planner. AIlison Ochs
MOTION: [?aug Cahill SEGOND: Rollie Kjesba VOTE: 6-0
TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 26, 2002
5_ A request for a recommendation ta the Vail Town Council to amend the Qonovan Park Master
Plan and a reques# for a final reW6ew af an amendment for the previously approVed de+relopment
plan, to allow for the construction ef the Dondvan Park Paailion, located at 1600 S. Frontage
Rd. WestlUnplatted Qonovan Park.
~ Applicant: To?nrn of Vaip, represen#ed by VAg> Inc.
Pfanner: Gearge Ruther
IVIOTIOIV: George Lamb SEGOND: Rollie Kjesbo VOTE: 5-1 (Schofield opposed)
RECOMMENDATION C)F APPROVAL TI3 TOWN COUh1CIL OF AMENDMENT TO ~
[]Oh10VAN PARK ~
7. A request for a minor arnendment to Special Development District No. 6, to alEow for an j
expansion of cornrrtercial uses into common area, lacated at 123 S. Fruntage Rd. WestlLots
M,N, &Q, Vail Village 1S" Filing.
Applicant: Club ChelSea, represented by JMP Architects
Planner: Warren Carnpbeff
MQTION: Doug Cahi{I SECGND: George Lamb VOTE: 8-0
ARPROVED WITH 1 C+aND1TION:
1. That the appEicant not madify the uses of the SDD #6, incfuding the number a# lodging or
EHU units withaut following the procedures as outlined in Section 12-9A-10 Qf the Vail
Town Code.
Staff ApproWals
VML LLC PEC02-001 1 George
~ Final review of townhouse Plat Fieview
285 Bridge StreetNail Mountain Lodge, Vail Village 15t Filing
Applican#: VML LLC, represented by Bailey & Petersan
5
7. Approval of July 22, 2002 minutes TABLED UMTEL AUGUST 26, 2002 ~
8. Information Update
The appCications and information about the proposafs are available for public inspectian during regular
affice hours in the praject planner's office lacated at the 7own af lfail Community Develapment
Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please caCl 479-2356,
Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
i
'
•
•
6
I
~ NIEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and EnvirQnmental Gommission
FR4M: Cflmmunaty Develaprnent Department
DATE: August 9, 2002
SUBJECT; A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6 Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
loca#ed at 5167 Gore Circle, Lot 12, Block 3, Bigharn 5`" Filing.
~
Applicant: Rolland Hamelin ;
Planner: Matt Gennett '
1. SUMMARII
The applican#, Rokland Hamelin, is requesting a variance from Section 12-6B-6, Minimum Rear Yard
Setback Requ[rement of the SFngle Family Residential (SFR) Zone District, for #he garage at his
residence an 5167 Gflre CircEe (Lpt 12, Block 3, Bighom 51"). In 1998, Mr. Hamelin inadvertently
built his garage in its present, nonconforming location, as a result of receiving and acting upon
erroneous, cerkified survey information from licensed professionals. The comer of the garage that
~ encraaches into the minimum rear setback is 112" feom the Old Highway 6 right-of-way, instead af
the required 15`, as stated in the code. The hardship #aced by the applicant is the product of a
mathematical error on the survey instrument he paid for anti used that was not discovered until staff
requesied a past-construction Improvement Lacation Cerfificate (ILC). Despite good faith efForts by
the applicant to fallow proper procedures and adhere ta code, his garage and residence are in a
state of noncompliance, and therefore, not legally modifiable. The exis#ing condition of the subject
property is the result of events promulgated wifhout Mr. Hamelin's knowledge. Staff is
recommending appraval of the requested variance as a hardship exists and would rtot canstitute
a granting af special prirrilege to this indiWidual property.
li. DE5CRIPTION QF REQUEST
The applicant is requesting relief from the SFR znne district's rriiniimum rear se#back of 15' from Old
Highway 6, just past the Dead End sign in East Vail. The rear carner of #he garage that encroaches
into the setback is 11'2" from the OId Highway 6 right-of-way, instead of the required 15', as stafed
in the cade. Tha reason for this discrepancy is due to an error on the ariginal survey that shawed
the distance in question as being 18'J", and therefare, outside of the setback. The ILC, performed
after the structure was built, showed the distance between the back corner of the garage and the
41cf Highway fi right-of-way as being 112", and this proved ta be the correct measurement. The
encraachment does no# cause any visual harm or nuisance against neighboring property cawners or
the general public and is in a locafion not readily visible to anyone ofF the property.
III. BACKGRQUND
~ In 1974, the Bighorn Fifth Addition was annexed into the Town of Vail via Ordinance 31,
~ 1
. '
I
Series of 1974, which became effective on Decernber 17, 1974. ~
* On ApEil 20, 1979, the permEt for construetion of the exisfing single-family hame on Lot 12,
Black 3 of the Bighorn 5th Addition was approved. ~
• On July 16, 1999, staff appraved Mr. Hamedin's garage addition application.
i
~
0
9
tV. RQLES QF REVfEWIMG BODIES ~
The PEC is res onsible for evaluatin a ro osal for: ~
Actiorr: The PEC is respansi[ale for final approvaUdenial of a variance.
The PEC is respansible for evaluating a proposal far.
1. The relationship of the requested variance to ather existing or potential uses and s#ructures in
the vicinity.
2. The degree to which reEief from the strict or literal interpretatiQn antl enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibiiiky and uniformity af trea#ment among
sites in the vicinity, ar to attain the objectives of this Title withaut grant of special prF+rilege.
3. The effect af the requesfed Variance on light and air, distribution of popufation, transportatian
and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and pubfic safety.
4. Such other faetors and criteria as the Gammission deems applicable to the proposed
varianee. ~
Desiqn Review Board:
Actran; The DRB has 1V(] review authority on a variance, but must revievs+ any accompanying
DR'B applfcatron.
~
Tawn Council: I
Acrions of DRB or PEG maybe appealed to the 7own Councif or by the Town Councr`l. Town ;
Council evaluafes vrvhether ar rrot the PEC or DRB erred w1fJa ap,nrovals or denials and can uphold, ;
uphoJd wdth modificatrvns, or averturn the board's decision. o
Staff: '
7he staff rs respansible for ensurrng thaf al/ su,brraittal requirements are pravided and plans
canform fo the technical requirements of the Zorring Regulations. The sfaff also advises the
appficanf as fo compltanee with the desrgn guideIines.
Stafi provides a staff inema containing background on the praperty and provrdes a sfaff evaluation ~
of the praject wrfh respect to the required criteria and frndings, and a recommerrdation on approval, ~
approval wifh conditions, or denial. Staff also facilrtates the review process. ~
!
V. APPLIGABLE F'LANNING DOGUMENTS r
Zoning Regulations
Chapter 6: Residential Districts, Article B. SFR, 'i 2-6B-6, Se#backs, and;
~
2
~ ChapteT 17: Variances, Sectians 12-17-1 thrpugh 12-17-8.
VI. SITE ANALYStS
Zoning: Single Family Residential (SFR)
Land Use Plan aesignation: Resident'ral
Current Land Use: Residential
I7eveloprraent S#andard Reauiredf Allowed Exis!ing Pmpcssd
Lot Area: 12,500 sq ft. (rnin.) 22,352 sq. ft. N/C
Setbacks:
Frant: 20' 48' N/C
Sides: 15' 34'6"/53'6" N/C
Rear: 15' 11,2°, 18,9„
Building Height: 30' 28' 28'
Density: One unit per !o#, max. 1 per 0.51 acre N/C
GRFa; 4,910 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft. N/C
~
Site Coverage: 4,470 sq. ft. (20%) 2,412 sq. ft. (12%) N/C
Landscape Area: 13,411 sq. ft. (60°l0) 13,422 sq. ft. (61 N/C
Parking: 2 spaces 2 spaces N/C
Vfl. SURROIJNDING LAN[] USES ANO ZONING
Land Use Zoninq
North: C7pen Space Natural Area Preservation
South: Residen#ial SFR Distriet
East: Open Space Not Designated
INest: Residen#ia! SFR District
VIII. CRITERIA ANQ FINDIMGS
A. Considerati_on of Factors Reqardinq the Setback Variances:
1. The relationship of the reques#ed variance to other existing or patential
uses and structures in the Vicinity.
The reques#ed variance is not of any consequence to other existing or
pa#ential uses and structures in the vicini#y.
~ 3
The granting af rhe variance will not be detrimental fo the public health, ~
safety or welfare, or rraaterially injunous to properties or improvements in the
vicinity. The garage has been in its present, nonconforming location since
1999 and the neighbors have not voiced any opposition then or now. The
garage, while being within the setback, is still 96' away from Old Nighway 6.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and [i#eral interpreta#ion and
enforcement o# a specified regulatiarr is necessary to achieve
ccsmpatihility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the viciniYy, nr
to attain #he objectiwes of this ti#le without a grant of special priuilege.
The granting of the variance will not canstitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other praperties classified in the same
district. 7he Applicant did not purposefully seek to locate the garage within
the rrFinimum setbacic and followeef proper procedures when applying for the
permit to build the garage, and during cons#ruction.
3. fihe Qffect af the requested variance on light and air, dis#ribution of
population, transportation and tcaffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
Staff daes not believe tha# there will be any negative impacts assoc'raled wfth
thss propQSaL 7he garage has existed in its present location for several years
without any known negative irnpacfis to any af the cruciaF elements mentianed ~
above in this finding.
The Plannirag and EnvironmentaG Commission shall rnake the following findincts before qrantinc# a
variance:
1. The granting of the variance will nat constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same
district.
2. The granting af the variance will ncrt be detrimental to the pubfic health,
safety or welfare, or nnaterially injurious to properties or irnpravements in the
vicinity.
~ 3. The variance is warranted for one ar more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specifed
regulation would result in practical difficulty ar unnecessary physical
hardship incansistent with the objectives of this title.
b. Excepfions or extraordinary circumstances ar conditions applicable to
the same site of the vanance exist that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
~
4
~
~ wauld deprive the applicant af priWileges enjoyed by the owners of
a#her properties En the same district.
IX. STAFF RECQiVIME'NDATION
The Community Qevelapmen# Department recornmends appraval of the request fora vadance frorrt
Section 12-6b-6, Minimum Rear Yard Setback in the SFR zone district to allow for the applicant tc,
ha+re a Iegal structure, StafF's reeammendation is based upora the review af the criteria in Section
VlII of this memorarodum and the evicfence and testimony presented, subject to #he following
findings:
Appraval
a) That the granting of the variance wifl not constitute a granting of special privi{ege i
incQnsistent with the limitations an other properties classified in the same district. ;
b) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to khe public health, safety, ar
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinit}r.
c) The strict literal interpretation or enforcernent of the specified regulation would result in
practicaf diffieufty tar unnecessary physical hardship inconsiskent with the abjectives of this
title,
d) The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specifed regulatEan would deprirre the
applicant of privileges enjayed by the owners of other properties in the same ciistrict.
~ X. Attachrrtents
A. Vicini#y Map
B. Copies af Surveys
C. Copies af carrespondence
~
~
5
I
0
W . ~
z ~
0) T
trj P co C37
l 7
2
LO
; r CO
i`!I LO
LO
LO
~ ~
Ep 4Y) _ F 4
trl
47
in 11~
Cp ~
Lo ~
N ~ Ln
to 0)
OD ~
Lf)
l['T
Cf>
Cf
I ~ T r r
LO co ~
Luc-)
LC)
Lo 1\~ C*7
+C14r
t ~
~ f Cl) ~Cy ~ 9~ ~ (11
LO
N co
r, ~
w
CL NSJN ~ ~ ~ r d
~
N
~ LL
~ LO
i
Cf]
u~
, ~
N
c^ ~
~
C3 ~ ~ m N ` LLI U') ao ~
o ~S p~ ; r~
~ - -
C.~
~
J I
l~ C Y 1 1' m~ / 1 ~ClJ ~y~ e-
co
4VAILL ~'or~v of~
Departrnent af Communiry 1?evelo,pment
75 South Frontmge Raad
Vail, Caloradn 81657
970-479-2138 ~
FAX 970-479-2452
December 16, 1999
l~Ir. Rolland S. Harneiin
5I67 Gore Circie
Vail, CO 81657
Re: 5167 Goi-e Circle/Lot 12, Block 3, Bigliorn 5rr`Addition
Fuildin- Perrnit B99-0204
Dear Ral:
This letter wilI serve ta confirn3 our cflnversation today reearding the garage adcEition at
the above-referenced property. Pursuant to the iinprovement location certifcate (ILC)
~ dated 11/17/99 by Peak- Land Consultants, a setbac:k encroachment axists «rhere the n.evv
;arage addition was constructed. Sectian 12-6C-6, Tovsrn of Vail Cade requires a
minzrnum 15-foot setback betia,reen the garage wa115 and the property line. Your ILC
indicates a I 1.2-foot setback between tlie garage ancf the property Iine.
The Town of Vail will not conduct any more inspeetions on this project un.til this
situation has been remedied. If you urould like to discuss this issue in greater detail,
please do not hesitate ta contact rne at (970) 479-2140,
Sincerely,
~i.~
Brent Wilson
Planner II
~
RECYG'l.EIJYAPER
~
'-.-f
~
VARIANCE - DESCRTFTiON of NATURE July 10, 2002
Encruachment an T.O.V. 15 ft set-back fi°om old Hvwy 6 R.4.W :(Just past " Dead End 44 sign in
East Slaii.
Set-back on one corner af existing garage is 11'2" vs required 15'. Distarice frorn thia corner to
the Hwy is 96ft! (The C.D.O.T. R.O.W. makes a strange "v" into the properiy for wh%ch they no
longer know why. )
When Z wanterl to build this garage several years ago I tflak the original survey (xnade by
Intermountain ) into the glanning cvmmittce ( Brent Wilscm ) and aske+d what was requu+ed. I
fallawed e. vanr a•equirement as girrezi to me by the planner iacluding an onsitc inspecrion aud
measurentents made lay hun. All construction, plans and inspectians were completed as required.
When I went in co request the finai inspc,ction anotlter individual came aut of the back office and
sai.d (exact worcis): " I don't lnaw what is going on in this office. But you have to have an
i.L.C." I then asked wha# that wa5, and then, considering it only a minor incvnvenience, thaugh
major expense, had it accomplished. The I.I..C, by Peak, however, shvwed a set-back on one
comex of i lft Z"" vs lSft 9" on the original survey.
At fisst I thought the new survey by Peaatc was incorrect because they had the house loc~atsd on
Main Gore r?ritve vs Gore Circle. However, after a couple af lxips back and forth between the
surveying companies, Pealc admitted to the wrong street but it was the lntermoun#ain survey that
was off. (1`he reaction of the gentleman at Intermountain who admitted to the discrepancy vwas " I ~
can't cosnment as i did nat work here then,")
I am requesting a varianca because:
1. I acted in good faith and accamplished everything in the time and manner requested. I believe
a variance is a better way to ga that? luwsuits ta cIear this up.
2. The garage xs fuliy cotnpieted, mostly concrete, and built utto the tuillside. impossibYe to
mave or alter.
3. 'Ihe area in question is not visible by any ather homes and ail neighbors arc itn agreement
with my reque$t.
4. The corner in questivn is barely visible from old Hwy 6 as it is a heawily wooded area at lcast
10#} below and almost 100 ft horizvntaRy frnm the road. (The nei,ghbor's gaiage is actually
Qloser to the highway, but not to the k.O.W.)
5. I would tike to malce further 'unprovements ta the dining aszd kitchen areas (?n a different
direciian) this fall so grobably can not "just let it sit" as originally suggested by planuer.
'1"hank you very much for yaur c.onsideration in clearing this ng in a practical manner with a
variance.
e ectfutly
R9i an amelin
i
~
~ Iuly 10, 2042
STA'1`EMEN1' ADOAESSING Pc:}TEWIAL CONCERN5 HY THE TOWN OF VAIL.
a. °The structure satisfies all requirements except the I5ft set-6ack fi-orrn; die vld Hwy G RdW,
1n a discussion witb C.D.O.T. ROW niamqer Dennis Devon 1 was infarrned that C.D.O.T. has ao
concern vvith the matier. It is only s T.O.V. requirement. If the siructure actually encroached on
their R+dW I would prvbably be given an "Encrtiachment License" as they had no plans for this
road ather than as a bike path, according to hum.
The c4rner in question is the furttaest point a£the entire house from any neighbor€ng homc aeid _
not aisible except possihly frQrn the old highway: alrnost I 00ft away and 10 ft higher.
b. Tt?e garage caraer is furthen° from the highway than the next door neighbors $arsge sa I am not
getting special treatment.
c. There is no effect on Iight and air as it is m4stly below ground. No homes cnuld ever be built
from this p+aityt narth due to Hwy G and I-70. So tlaere is no conflict rrrith papulation distribution
gnd C.D.Q.T.
has no problen regardizxg transportativn. (See above a. ) Saine for public saf"ety. (See a+b )
d. T.O.V. planning palicies arad abjectives are to provide its citixens with a pleasant environment
~ in a common sense, pracraeal rnanner and 'i believe this matter rneets a4i tf;ese requirements_
Respectfully
Rolland HaineU
~
~ MEMORAIVDfJM
TO: Planning and Envirflnmental Cammission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: August 12, 2002
SUBJECT: A request far a conditional Use permit, to allaw for a public utility ins#allation,
located at the East Vai3 VVater Tank, 5004 Snowshoe LanefSummer Recreatianal
Area, Vaif Meadows Filing 1.
ApplFCant: Town af Vail _
Planner. Bill Gibson
1. SUiVIMARY
The appGcant, Town of Vail, is requesting approval af a conditional use permit to allaw
#ar a public uti[ity installation, locatetf at the east Vail water tank site, 5004 Snowshoe
Lane. Based upnn Staff's review of the cdteria in Section Vill af this memorancEum and
the eWidence and testimony presented, the Gommunity Qeveloprnent 'i7epartment
~ recommentfs approval of this request subject to the fndings and condition nated in
Section lX af this memorancium.
H. DESCRIPTION dF REQUEST
The Touvn of Vail is requesting approval of a canditiorral use permit to allow for a public
utility installatian, locatect at the east Vail water fank site, 5004 Snowshoe Lane. This
propased public utility ins#a!]ation is a Pubfic Safety Radia installation consisting of an
equipment building and a comrnunications tower. This proposed Public Safety Radio
instaflation wFll senre as a"filP' site in the Eagle Caunty Trunked Safety Network to
provide cantinuous comrnunications coverage in the East Vai] area for Police, F'ire, EMS
and other T'own and Coun#y agencies.
The proposed equiprnent buiiding will be a single-story, 8 foat by 8 faot concrete structure
painted to match the existing water tanic. The prvposed communications tower will be a 40
foot 5elf supporting, "monapole" type tower supporting 2 panel type antennas. The
proposed tawer will also be painted to match the existing water tank.
fll. BACKGROUND
,4s further described in the attached Motorala "Executive Summary", the Eagle Caunty
Trunked Public Safety Network cansists of several communications sites thraughout Eagle
County to pravide cornmunications for Police, Fire, EMS, and other Town and County
agencies. It has been determined that the east Vail area currerrtly daes nat hawe continuous
to communications caverage and there is a need for the construction of an additional Public
~
Safety Radio ins#alla#ion tcr "fiIf" these uncoWered areas. Based upon several coverage tests ~
conducted by Motorala in 2001, the site comrnonly known as the east Vail water tank site
was selected as the most apprapriate "fi1!" site Iocation. Access to this site is currently
contral9ed by the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District which pravides added security
for this proposed Public Sa'fety Radio instalYatian.
This site is currently awned by fihe Tawn of Vail and the Eagle River Water ant! Sanitatian
Distric#. The site as zoned General Use and is the current location of one 33 foot tall,
500,000 gallon afaove grade water storage tanic, a 1,000,400 gallon below grade water
storage tanks, several smal6er below grade water storage tanks and assaciated utility
facifities.
Based upon the Offcial Town of Vail Geolagic Hazard Maps, this praperty is located within
several geolagic hazard zones includ@ng: High Hazard Debris Flow, Moderate Hazard
Debris Flow, Medium Severity Rockfal1, High Avalanche Hazard, and Passible Avalanche
Inf{uence Hazard.
A# its August 7, 2002, public hearing the Town of Vail Design Review Board approved
the proposed Public Safety Radio installatian subject to the following coraditions:
1. The Design Review Board's appraval is contingent upon the applicant receiving
the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a conditional use
permit for this propasal.
2. fihe proposed bui4ding anc4 tower shall be pain#ed to match the existing east Vail ~
abave grade water storage tank prior to the issuance of final building inspectian
appraval,
IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BDRIES
Ptanning and__Enyironmental,Commissian:
Action: The PEC is responsible for final approvaUapprava1 with conditiansldenial of
a ceanditional use permit.
The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives af the Town.
2. Effect of the use an light and air, distributian of papulation, transpor#ation
facilities, utili#aes, schflols, parks and recreation faeiiities, and other pubfic
facilities and public facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particuCar reference to congestaon, automotive and
, pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and ccantral, access,
rrtaneuverabifity, and removal of snaw frorn the streets and parking areas.
4. EfFect upon the character af the area in which the prrpasec3 use is to be Eocatec3,
including the scale and bulk of the praposed use in relation ta surrounding uses.
5. Such other factors and criteria as tfre Gommission deems applicable ta the
praposed use. ~
6. Confarmance with development standards af zone district.
2
~ Desiqn Review Board:
Action: The DRB has NO review authority on a conditional use permit, but must review
any accompanying DRB application.
Town Council:
Actions of aRB or PEC maybe appealed ko the Town Council or by the Town Cduncil.
Town Gouncil evaluates whether or not the PEC or aRB erred with approvals or denials
and can uphold, uphoEd with madifications, or overturn the board's decisEOn.
Staff: The staff is respansible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are prvvideti and
plans confQrm to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations, Tha stafF also
advises the applicant as to compiiance with the design guidelines.
Staff pravides a staff rnemo containing backgraund on the property and prQvicGes a staff
evaluation af the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a
recomrriendatian on approval, approval with condi#ions, or denial. StafF also facilitates the
review pracess. '
V. APPLICABL€ PLANNING LIQCUAIIENTs
Town of Vail Zonin Re ulatio~Title 12 Vaii Towra Cvde
~ The eas# Vail water tank site is zoned Generaf Use. Pursuant to Section 12-9C-
1, Vail Town Code, the purpose of the Generai Use zone district is as follaws:
PURPQSE: The general use disfrict is intended to provide sites for public
and quasi-publie uscs whrch, because of fherr special characteristics,
cannot be apprapriafely regulated by the deuelopment standards
prescrrbed for other zoning distrrcts, and for which developmerrt
standards especially prescribed for each partrcular development proposal
ar pro}ect are necessary to achieve the purposes prescribed rn secfian
12-1-2 of thrs fitfe and to provide for the public weIfare. The general use
district is intended to ensure tHaf public buifdings and graunds artd Cerfain
types of quasi-public uses permitted in the district are appro,priately
loeated and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail,
to harrrronize with surrounding uses, and, in the case of 6uildings and
ofher sfructures, fv ensure adequafe light, air, open spaces, and ather
arrrenrfies appropriate to the permifted types at'uses.
5ectkon 12-9C-3, Vail Town Cade, identifies public utilities installations includ'ang
transrnission lines and appurtenant equipment as a condrtianal uses in General
Use zane distric#.
~
3
Forfhe Planning and EnvironmentaR Commission's reference, Section 12-96-9, Vail ~
Town Gode, identifies the purpose for a conditiQnaf use permit as follows:
In order to provide the flexibifity necessary to achieve the abjectives of
this fitle, s,aeeified uses are permitfed in certaln districts subjecf ta the
granting af a canditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special
characterrstics, condrtional uses requrre review so that they may be
located properly wlth respect to the purposes of this fitle and with respact
ta their effects on surraurrding properties. The review prdcess prescribed
in thts chapter rs irrtended to assure cornpatibilify and harmanious
developmenf befween condrtranal uses and surrouna(ing praperties in the
Town at large. Uses lisfed as conditrorral uses in the uarious districts
rnay be permitted subject to such conelrtlons and Irmitations as the 7awn
may prescribe to insure fhaf the location and operatrorr of the conditional
uses wrll be in accordance with the developmerrt objectives of the Town
and wrll nof be cletrfrrrental to other uses or properties. Where conditions
cenncat be devised, to achieve these ofajective,s, applicafiorrs for
canditional use permits shall be d'enied.
In the General Use zone district, developmerat standards are prescribed by the
P'lanning and Environenental Cammission. Section 12-9C-5, 4/ail Tawn Gode,
states:
Prescribed byPlanning and Environmerrtal Commissiara: frr the general use ~
cfistrict, development standards in each of the following categories shall be
as prescri,bed by the plartning arrd errvironmental corrrmission:
9. Lot area and sife dimensions.
2. Set6acks.
3. Building height.
4. Densify eontrol.
5. Site coverage.
6. Landscaping and site development.
7. Parking and loadirrg.
Reviewed By F'lanning and Environmenfal Commission: DeuelQprraent
standards shall be praposed by the applicant as a part of a cond'itronaf
use Rermit application. Sife specifrc development standards shall then 6e
determined by the plannrng arad enviranmerrtal cammissiorr during the
review of the conafitional use request in accordence wifh the provisions of
chapfer 76 of fhr`s titfe.
Based upon Section 12-2-2, Vail Town Code, this proposed Public Safe#y Radio
instal[afion is nat defined as a"structure" and is therefore nof subject to many of
the development standards prescribed by the Town o$ Vail Zoning Regulations
(Title 12, Vail Town Code). The definition of "structure° as prescribed by Section
12-2-2, Vail Town Code, is as follows: ~
4
i
- ;
~ Structure: Anything ccanstructed or erected with a ffxed locatfon on the
ground, but not including pales, lines, cables, ar otfter transmission
or distri6ution facilities of public utilriUes, or mallbvxes orlighf
ffxtures. At the cliscretion of the design review board, srvimming paols and
tennis courts may 6e exempted from this defrnrtion.
Town of Uail Land Use Plan
The Tnwn of Vail Land Use Plan designates the East Vaii Water Tank site as Open I
Space (OS). This iand use designation is described by the Town of Vail Land Use
Plan as fallows:
Passive recreation areas such as greera,betts, stream corridors and drainage
ways are the types of areas in this category. Hr"!lsides which ware classified
as undeveloped due ta high hazards and slopes over 40% are also included
within fhis area. 7'hese hillside areas would stiN be allowed types of
developrnent permitted by existrng zoning, such as one urrit per 35 acres, for
areas af agricultural zvnfng. Afso, permitted rn fhis area would be
irrstitutional/public uses.
7he Town of 1/ail Land lJse plan includes the following gaa3s staternents that s#aff
beEieves are applicable to this proposaL'
~ 6.1 Services should keep pace with irrcreased growth.
6.2 The Town of Vail should play a role in future development through
6alancing growth with services.
6.3 Servrces should 6e adjusted to keep pace with the needs of peak
periods.
Town of Vail Camprehensiwe flpen Lands Plan
The Acfion PAan map of the Town of Vail Gomprehensive Open Lands Plan identifies
this site as a portian of the South Trail "Parce147". The following text from the Action
F'lan excludes the east Vail wafef tank site ffam the open space development
recommendations of the plan and encourages the continued use of the site for public
utilities:
Parce147: "Recreation Area" nat rncludin water tank site
High priority: TOV acquire conservation easement far trall, trailtread, picnic
area arrd continued use of water tank. This parcef is lrr a hazard area.
~
5
VL SITE ANALYSIS ~
Zoning: General Use j
Land LJse Plan Designation: Open Space
Current Land Use: Open SpacelPublic EJtilities
Lat Area: 130,506 sq.ft. (2.996 ac)
Hazards: High Hazard Debris Flow, Moderate Hazard Debris Flow,
Medium Severity Rockfall, High Avalanche Hazard, and
Possible Avalarrche Inffuence Hazard
aevelopment Standard Allowed Existinq F'roposed
Se#backs: Front: N/A N/A N/A
Sides: N/A N/A N/A
Rear: N/A N/A N/A
Building H€;ight: N/A N/A N/A
Density: N/A N/A N/A
GRFA: N/A h11A N/A
Site Coverage: hJ1A N/A N/A
Landscape Area: N/A N/A N/A
Parking: N/A N/A N/A
VII. SURRC]UNaING LAND USES AND ZONING
Land Use Zoning
North: Residential Two-Family Residential (R) ~
South: White River National Forest N/A
East: Open Space NaturalAreaPresenration(NAP)
West: Whi#e River Natianal Forest N/A
Vtll. CRITERIA ANQ FINDINGS
The review criteria for a request of this nature are establashed by the Town Code.
The proposed public utality installation is (acated within the Generai Use zone
district. 7herefore, this proposal is subject ta the issuance of a concfitional use
permit in accardancE with the provisions of Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Gode.
A. Consideration of Factcars Regarding the Setback Variances;
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the
Town.
The Town of Vail Land Use Plan designates the eas# Vail water tank site as
Upen Space (OS). This land use designation is describetS by the Town Qf Vail
Land Use P{an as foflows:
~
6
~ Passive recreation areas such as greenbelfs, stream corridars and d,rainage
ways are the types of arsas in thrs cafegvry. h'illsides whrch were classified ~
I
as undeveIoped due to high hazarels and slopes over40°fo are also rncluded
withirr this area. These hi!lside areas would sti1l ,be aflowed types of
de velopment permitted by existing zonrng, such as one unit per 35acres, for
areas of agriculfural zonirrg. A1sa, permitted in this area would be
instifutional/pu6lic uses.
The proposed PUblic Safety Radio instaElation is consistent with the Town of Vail
Land Use Plan's Opcn Space land use designation, since the proposed Public
Safety Radio instalfation is a public use that is canditionally permitted by zoning. ;
Rn addition, the Tavvn of Vail Lancf Use PEan includes the following goals
statements that Staff believes are applicabEe to this proposal:
6.1 Senrices should keep ,pace with increased growth.
6.2 The Town of Vail should play a role in future development through
halarrcing growth with services.
6.3 Services shauld be adfusted to keep pace with the nesds of peak
periods.
~ Staff beGeves that this prapasal meets these develQpment objec#ives of the
Tovvn of Vail Land Use Plan.
The Town of Vail Comprehensive {Jpen Lands Plan identifies this site as a
partion of the South Traif "Parcel 47"; hawever, the text from the Actian Plan
excludes the east Vail water tank site from #he apen space development
recommendations of the plan and enccaurages the continued use of the site far
public utilEties.
Staff believes that this proposal meets the development objectives of the Town
of Vaii, the objectives of the applicabie master plans, and improves the safety
and well-being of life and property within the east Vail area. ~
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distributinn o€ populatian, I
transportation faeilities, utilities, schoals, parks and recreation facilities,
and other public facilities needs.
The proposed additian to the k'ubfic Safety Radio installation will have
minimal irnpacts on light and air, distributiort of population, transportation
facilities, schools, or parks and recreation. This proposed Public Safety
Fiadio instaliation wilf operate in the same frequency range as cellufar and
will present na mflre interference potential than the two sxisting cellular
towers located to #he southeast of this site. -
~
7
Staff befieves #hat t[ne proposed Public Safety Radia installatian greatly ~
benefits the community's public safety neecfs as it provides Gontinuous
communications coverage in tFae East Vail area for Police, iFire, EMS and
other City and County agencies.
3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference tu congestion, automvtive
and pedestrian safety and canvenience, traffic flow and controi, access,
maneuverability, and remaval of snow from the street and parking areas.
Since this Pub1ic Safety Radeo installation will be remotely monitored and will
anly require a few vehicular trips annually for maintenance, 5taff does not
believe that the proposed Public Safe#y Radio instailation will have any negative
impacts on the above-referenced criteria.
4. Effect upon the character vf the area in which the proposed use is to be
located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
The Design Review Board has canditionally appraved this praposal and required
that the Public Safety Radio installatian building and tower be painted to match
the existing east Vail above grade water storage tank to minamize the uisual and
aesthetic impacts of this proposal on the surrcaunding uses. Staff believes that
the proposed Public Safety Radia installafion w'rll have rninimal negative impacts
in comparison to the existing site conditians on the above-referenced criteria. ~
B. The Planning and Environrnentai Commissian shall make the folfawinq findinqs
befare qranting a conditional use permit:
1. That the proposed locatian of the use is in accordance with the purposes of
the canditional use permit section af the zoning code and the purposes af
the General Use Zone District.
2. That the proposed locatian of the use and the conditions under whicn it will
be operated or maintained will not be detrimental #o the public health, safety,
or welfare car materially injuriaus to properties or itnprovements in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will eamply v+rith each of the applicable provisions of
the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
~
8
I -
~ IK. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Gommuni#y aeveloprnent Department recommencis appraval for a conditional use
permit, to allow far a public utility installation, located at the east Vail water tank site, 5004
Sno+rrshoe LanelSummer Recreational Area, Vail Meadaws Filing 1. Staff"s
recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Sectian VIII of this
memorandum and the evidence and testimany presented, subjec# to the following findings.
I . That the praposed location of the use is in accordance with the purpases of the
conditivnal use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the
General Use Zone District.
2. That the ;proposed location a# the use and the conditions under which it wifl be
operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the pubfic health, safety, ar
welfare br materially injurious to properties or improvements in the r+icinity.
3. Thaf the propas@d use will camply with each of the applicable provESions of the
conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
Should the Planning and Environmental Comrraission choose to apprawe this conditional use
permit request, the Gommunity Development Depar#ment recommends the following
cnnditiora:
~ 1. Frior to ths applica#ion for abuilding permit, the appficarof shall submit a site
specific geolagoc investigation, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 12-
21, Vail Town Code, to the Cammunity Developmenf Department for rewiew
and aspproval. Based upon the results of #his site specific geologic
investigation and/or any future live communications coverage tests, Staff
may review and approWe the relocatian of the propvsed building ancf
communications tower on the site if said relocation will not significan#ly alter
the character and intent of this proposal.
X. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. PUblication Notice
C. NarratiWe for Gore Tank 5ite
D. Niotarola Executive Summary
E. SEte LayoutlPhoto
F. Tawer & ,tlntenna Specificatfons/Fhoto
~
9
~
- ATTACIIMENT A
~ Vicinity Map
. .
east Vai I water tank site ~
J
~7 5 , ~.5114f, y 5128 3
1, \ 5074 ~ J 5207
f
32 P
5037 5$ 2 5134 4
- ~ 29 F 5207 _
~
5075 5
3'f 1 1 7 ~ ~ 1~ ~ 5209
5027 28 51 D4 ~r
6
30 5095 g
~ 5210
010 5202 5038
27 5142 7
~ 26 5035 5211
ZFJ \Ir 5053 514$ i 5211 '
24 5033
5013 12 52'! 3 5154 ~ 12 ~
5215
13 15
~
23 ~ I ~ 5164
5002 5 '~$4
~ 21 515
22 14 I
I
5132 5142 ~ ~ 5174 5165 16 +
5194
D04 5175 I.
VI `17~~ t I` 18
5195 I
51$5
,
' 1 V
~
~ N
ATTACHMENT B
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY '
PUBLIC NOTIGE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and EnvironmentaP Comrrtiission o'f the 7owvn of ~
Vail wilF ho{d a pubGc hearing in accQrdance with Section 92-3-6 of the N'lunicipal Code of the
Tawn of Vai[ on Augus# 12, 2002, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. tn
cansideration caf:
A request for a variance from Section 12-6B-6 (Setbacks), Vail Town Ctsde, to allow for a
garage encroachrnent in the rear sekbacfc, located af 5167 Gore Circle/Lot 12, Block 3, Bighorn
Subdivision 51' Addition.
Applican#: RolCand S. Hameiin
Planner: Matt Gennett
A request for a fir+al revEEw and recommendations of the follo+nring epplications related ta the
proposed redevelopment pf the Vail Mourrtain School:
1) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to rezone 3010 Booth
Falls RaadlLot 11, Siock 2, Vail VilEage 12'" Filing from Two-Family Residential to
GeneraE Use;
2) A request f.or a recommenda#ion tv the Vail Towr, Council #o Zone Lot 12, Block 2,
Vail Viflage 12" Filing #o General Use, The northern par#ion of this lot is zoned
Agriculture C}pen Space;
3) A request for a recornmendation ta the Vail Town Gouncil to rezone Traet C, Black 1,
Vail Vilfage 12' Filing firam Two-Family Residential to General Use;
4) A Eequest far a recommendatian t4 amend the official Town of Vail Land Use Map for
Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12' Filing from Low Density Residentiai to PubIiclSemE-
Public; ~
5) A request for an arrtendment ta the previously approved developmertt plan and a
new conditional use permit for a priva#e educational institution and an active autdoor
recreatian area an 3010 Baoth Falls RoadlLot 11, Blocfc 2, Vail Village 12' Filing and
3160 N. Frontage Road East/ Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing;
6} A request for a conditional use permit ta allow fQr the construction af eight Type III ~
EHUs located an Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12' Filing;
7) A request for a far a conditional use permit to allow for temporary modular classroom
structures located at 3160 N. Frontage Rd. East/ a par# of Lot 12, BIOG{C 2, Vail Village
2" FEl1flg; I
8) A rec{ues# far a recammendatian to #he Vail Tawn Cauncil to modify the official Town ~
ofi Vail Rackfalf Hazard fulap #o indicate approved mitigation for 3160 N. Frvn#age
RaadlLot 12, Block 2, and Traet C, Block 1, Vail Village 12`h Fil[ing;
9) A request for a major subdivision in accordanee with Title 13, Chapter 3, Vail Tawn
Gocfe, and setting forth details in regards thereto, located at Lots 11 and 12, Block 2,
Vail Village 12'hFiling and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12'" Filrng.
App[icant. Vail Mvurttain School, represen#ed by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Russ Forrest
A request for a minor amendment to Special Developnment District No. 6, to allc,w for an expansian
of commercial uses into common area, iocated at 123 S. Fr4ntage Rd. WestILots M,N, &O, Vail
Village 9" FIlCflg.
Applicant: Gfub Chelsea, represented by JMP Architects ~
Planner: Warren Campbell
~ i~
ToIvn~ o~ Varc
A request for a final review of a final plat for a rnajor subdivision; a request for a finai rewiew of a
conditionaf use permit to alfow for a private educational institutiQn and deveiaprment plan approval
~ to eonstruct em+ployee housing; and setting forth detaifs in regards 4hereto, located at the site
known as "Mountain Bell"/an unpiatted piece af property, iocated a# 160 N. Frontage Rd,lta be
platted as Lot 1, Middle Creek subdiWision.
Applicant: Vail Local Housing Authority, represented by Odell Aechifec#s
Pkanner: Aflison Ochs
A request fnr a conditianal use permit, to allvw for a public utility installativn, located at the
Eas# Vail Water Tank, 5004 Snowshoe LanelSurnmer Recreational Area, Vail Meadows Filing
1.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bif1 Gibson
. i
A request for a recommendation ta the Vaif Town Cauncrl to of an arnendment ta Section 12-7A-7
(Height), Vail Town Code, #o increase the maximum alkowable buifding height in thE Public
Accommodation Zone [}istrict.
Applicant: Bob Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: George Ruther
The applications and informa#ion, abaut the praposals are available for public inspectian during
regular office hours in the peoject planner's office, located at the Tov++n of Vai! Community
~ Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to a#tend project
orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the To+nrn of Vail Community
Develaprnent Department. Please call 479-2138 for infarmation.
Sign language interpretafion available upon request with 24-hour natification. Please cail 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impairetl, far information.
Camnnunity Deveiopment aepartment
Published July 26, 2002 in the Vai{ daily.
~
~
2
' ATTACHMENT C
~
NARItIA,TI%'E FQR GORE TANK SITE
The gurpase for the request to canstruct an equipment enclosure and 40' self supporting
tower at the Gore Water Tanks Site is to provid@ an accessible yet secure location for a
Publie Safety Radio site utilized by P41ice, Fire, EMS and ather City and County
agencies.
The instaliation will consist af an S foot by S foot build.ing on a concrete pad with a 40°
"manapole" type tower supportzng 2 panel type antennas. The building will hava an
exposed a~;~e~ate suz-face and can be colored to'blend into the surroundings. The
"monopoie" will be painted to blend into the txee lirae. Typically, this will be flat black.
The building will house the radio equipment that wiil networic into the Countywide radio
system anci enhance the coverage specific to the East Vail area. The radios mperate in the
same frequency range as eellular and wauld present no more interference potential than
the two cellular towvers loeated to the South East of the water tank.
Access to the site wauid be necessary anly in the event of a hard failure or annually for
routine maintenance. The service requirements, after install, are minimal. The system is
inonitored at a central kacation and most adjustments can be anade remotely.
~
. I
;
i
REC'D AUG - 12002
~
ATTACHMENT D
Executive Summary
~ The Eagle County Trunked Pubfic Safety Netwark is made up of several
communications sites throughaut the Caunty. Tine sys#em has been an ongoing
project that began in Late 1997. The primary system companen#s have beera .
funded by the County with sQrne trunked sites being funded by focai cammunities
to provide needed coverage or capacity fior their specifc needs. These "filf" sites -
are integrated into the `Master Site" and complement the network. Most users are
dispatched from the Vail Poiice Department Dispatch Center where the
SrnartZane Master con#roller is loeated.
As the system has buift out the need for an additional "fril° site to pravide
coverage into the East Vail area was identifecl. The master plan had identified
Baoth Fafls as a IEkely site since is had been a voted receiver site utilized with the
UHF system that #he trunked system replaced. ln mid 2001 several cowefage
tests were canducted to test t-ris theory and it was determirted that Booth Falls
did not provide #he needed additiQnal coverage. Motoro[a Engineers were
requested ta utilize a coverage projectian software tool to iaca#e an alternate si#e
for consideration.
The Gore Tank site was seCected based on coverage reliability and security. The
Gare Tank locatian is si#uateci in the hills south of East Vail and laoks down ort
the most important caverage areas. Eagle Riwer Water Authority contrqls i# and
~ access should not be a consideration. A live coverage #est was conduc#ed in rnid
December to verffy the predictions. Cory Schmidt ot the 1/aiE Police Dept.
participa#ed and confirmed the coverage tD be what is needed for East Vail.
N1o#orola was asked to design and prapase a solutipn far cansideration by the
Town of Vail. The attached proposal and documentation provides the vehicle to procure and install this site. The items required from Vail are outlined in the documents but
bcieffy they include. .
+ Permission to Canstruct as+malI building on site
•PermissiQn sa install a. 40 faot sectian af antenna support
~ Pravide electrical to the site
• Arrange far a T1 circuit to the site
• License the radio frequencies (this will be done by the County)
The site will consist of 4 Intellirepeaters and necessary infrastructure to
accommodate reasanabie expansion as needed. The Counfy plans to acfd #he 5~'
eepeater to bafance the sites with the others in the Vail cvverage area. TFte
equipment wilC be housed in of typical radio structure with backup
power and environmental controls. e~U' antenna struc#ure wilf be attached #o
the building and not need any supp rt from the tank.
i
00
~~9~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ " ~a
. ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
~
` ~ ~
- ' ' ~ ~
~ "
~ - ~ ~
- _
~ ~ ~
~ ~ 1;
b
~ f=' ~ 9
._~~.~~i ~ - .
~
~
y~- y;~~."'_-
~ ~y ~R _~<t .t
N
~ m
i
~ ~+r. T'rs.~: ~
~ b S 4 RI2~~x lOkt~E bUC~~--• p`
p '
8740
'
E~.45S, lQ" v 4.P,
+ Y•!A'CC~ NtAlW
. ~uy' GATti VALVE a
,
~ , . .
P.S.P. WAI
\
$ a~ kTaQQSWC- vawF~
•,.f ~~'E~ f .
L l) ..~y~ yK&es f ~.d~' a
lALuE
i'~ : 'O ~ -~eewv ~ , , .
47
F ~ • . ~
J
~ ~~I ~ ' 9 = ° ~ ~
2 ~
~
~ ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ 1 ~ . ~ I f .
y>, ~ ~ I, 1 ~ " ~ iQ~ ~,r~
.i-:<.,,:d :.c ~ ~ ~ ~ a,~~~6 ~ •
~ ~ r~ ~ ~ e m e
u'
~.V~ Q
~
6te
~ l ~ -~1 ~
• ~
7 6 . 194~~
a
~ 8
~
~ . . .gw .•P._... ,'..c-.- 9'~" q - -
A~.t+
a f K, F ~W h ~W~'~7^ k ~
{ k4
r
. . . ~ ~ .
. ~
. . ~ d . . . ~ .
tF
~
hL ~ r-f ~ _+'-F~.i~ { ti ~F i, ~ • p i ~
i.ri e'~ ~M~~ '~s~ " x ~ •
J Y ro F 4,. { _ 1 F.
K
s.
~ ~~~~hNk~~~.~},~c. ~~~c ~ . ~ ~ •
rzi ~ I I~, r ~ ill _
,
.
~
. •
. `
.
. . . ,
. . , . ' ' L .
h '~ari.'C"~.yr~r,.
'ys'w~•
~
. .
t
~
y~ l
y ,.M 4~ L
. . . _ . ? . . . .
~4i?rtf
`
,
`
ATTACHMENT F
~ .
SITE, EAST VAIL CO
NEfGI'HTi 401
~
40' EIA STANDAR?i 222-E
WINDa Bfl MPH
aeEi
REVISI13Nj
N?TES
J 1. DESIGN MEETS T'HE REQUIREMENTS ?F
¢ EIA DESIGN STFlNDARD LISTED AB?VE,
v ~ 2, PIPE S7EEL SHALL BE ASThI A53 GRIl B.
ALL ?THER STEEL SHALL BE ASTM A36,
3. ALL CONhIECTIL7NS CWELDED ANL BOLTED!
~ X SHALL C?NFIIRM T? AISC 'MANUAL ?F
V A STEEL C?NSTRLJCTI?N' LATEST E?ITI?N,
C4 0 4, IF RNY ITEM ?F THE CCMPLETED ST12UC-
TURE DC]ES MEET THIS DESIGN pS
DEFIC7El7 t]N THIS ]3RAWING TNE CERTI-
c\j FFCRTION BY TOWERKRAFT ENG. SHALL
r, BE CON5IDEREA INVALID AfYD l°C7WER-
KRRF7 SHALL BE N071FIED TMMEDIATELY
FOR REVISI?NS,
LOADS
20' ELEV, ITEM LINE
~ 40' CE WAVE AP881208 7/8
Q' CELWAVIE AP881208 7/8
J
' a ...J
~
~ % wXPRELIMINARY)OK
QLn POL,E PARAMETERS SllBJECT TD
u X CHANGE UPflN FINAL DESIGN,
r~ Q
. o
w
~n
~
YQUNG'S MANUFAC7'URING
28 IPEST 54UT.Fxr 4TH
~ M'ONTRDSE, CO 81401
A -
LLJ 4
J r~VERKRAFT PRQJECT k0.
T 3K)KAX
~ } - TIiLWi
I I) PO~-E DA TA SHEET
~ TOWERKRAFT ENGINEERING BY' ARK
~ 323 N?OHRARA STREET
M 1 1-1 I Id I I-I I~-I I I~I I I ALLIANCE, NE 69301 A ~
L csoea 762-5oa2 7-09-02
nwG, Ne, YOUIVG40 PAGE 1 flF 1
/
I)irectiQnal Panel Antenna
Product Data Sheet far AP881211 ~
~
These 120 degree directional panel antennas have'been
specifirally desigmed for low dettsity three sector
AlvfPS±"F,ACS cell sites9 whete AM.PS/TAC5fG5N1
systems are eonnbined in a single ancenna. Their wide
bandwidth allaws fvr their use for transmit, receive and
. 1 fixll dupjex applications. Both feature a side-fed dipale
clesign and lvw loss air dielectric stripline feed. Their
;w high, front-to-back ratio effectively isolates interference
frorat adjacent eells and makes them nearly impervious to
tower chanaes. tU components ase aluninum ailoy;
stainiess stcel serews are double seeured to eliminate
non-linear joants. A hdgh impact, lvw lcsss, UV stabilized
weather resistant radome ensures t6e antenna's use in afl
r a s
r, climates and hbstiye enuiranmental couciitions.
, zf
J
AP881245 ':AP881206 :
Product S ecifications
Frequency Sand Cellular ($24-849, $69-844
MHz), Trunking/SMR
(806-824, $51-869 MHz)
Horixon#al Pattern Directinnal
Antenna Type Panel
Gavn dBd (dBi) _ 10.5 (12.6) ~
Frequency ltanhe - Mliz 806-961
Connector Type n-female
Electrical Tilt - Degrees I0
Horizont;~l Beamvvidth ia 1Degrees at 3dB, 1f2 Power 120
Points
Viounting Hardware - Supplied 10238
Rated Wind Speed - mph (knn/hr) 100 (161)
Bandrwidth - ii~Hz for 1.5:1 VS'W'R 154
Verticai Beamwidth iu Degrees at 3 dB, 1/2 Power 15
Points
' Pniarizatian Vertical
Frunt-7'a-Back Ratio - dII 24
Nlaximuin Pawer lnput - Watks 500
Lighrning Farotection Direct Ground
3rd (7rder iMD a, 16 x 41 d$m: - dBm -1 aa
Dimensirsns - WxDxx - in. (mm) 7.625 x 5.0 x 4$. t(193.'r x
] 2? x 1222)
~ I
RADlO FREQitElYZY SYS'TEMS EM
cELwAvE Cabtewave ~
USA 1-877-RF'S-WflRLD • Intcrnatienal 1-203-630-3311 • Latxn America 1-602-252-8058 • Canacia 1-840-267-1762 6J4312002
Directional Panel Antenna
Froduct Data Sheet for AP8$1211 (Cant,)
~ Weight rv/o 1Mtg. Hardrvare - lbs. k lnteQral w/ant
~ g} a CI1d1S
Weibht wl Mtg. Hardware - Ibs. (kg) 17 (7.73)
Radiating Elemen# PvlAterial Aluminurn Alloy
Radame Materiai UV Stabilized High Impact
IIA-BS Plastic
Reflector Material ~5052 - H32 Aluminum
iY1as Wind Loadin ; Area (k'lat Plate Equivalent) - ftz 3.0(0.28)
IVlaximum Thrust @ Rated Wind -!bf (N) 120 (534)
Side Wind Loadiog Area (FPE) - ftz {m'} 111.67 (0.16)
Side fihrust @ Rated Wind - Ibf (N) 67 (297)
Shipping Weight- lbs. (kg) 1127 (123)
Shipping bimensions of Antetttta - WxDxH - in. (unm) 10 x16 x 54 (254 x 406 x
11372)
S;hipping I}imensaons of Aceessary - WxDaH - ft. (m) 11 !'acked wlantenna
Shappimg Made CJPS
FeaturesBenefits
* Slim profile
~ Aesthetically pleaszng and may be painted to blend with architecture.
• Weather resistant
, Protects radiating elemeats frvm hostile environcnents, uzinizanizes pattern distoa-tion due
to ice buiIdup.
- High fron#-to-back ratio
IsoIates frozn co-channel and adjacent sites.
~
FtAOlt] FREQUENCY SYSiEMS ~
CEL'N.RVE Cabtewave
Sir
t1SA 1-877-RES-WORLD - lnternaiionai 1-203-630-3311 • Latin America 1-602-252-8058 •Canada 1-$00-267-1752 6i13/2002
-s
~
~
r
t
` k j 6a. r . ',1
-kY
~
Pi
¢t~ ~t '1~t~t'. : x'k e "~s {t q 'c ~ ,i,' • ~ L:. r `^L'
~ ~j .T.~ T~ ,4• .y~~~, ;v a1.p ~A , T y t i ro 1
.N ~ey . ~ .i• .~s^>~~ y ' ~ ~ ~ 7
_1~ "1 r~ ~ _ ~A ~ Si
-w
~ . ~ .
.
, : . . .
Y '?v ~
. . , r--'..
, . • _ ' ~ - ~ ' . . .
8.
::a :;~?.i .•r.z.'sc `-s s' .n
A T
_
~
I
f
r -
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FRC}M: Cornmunity Development Department
DATE; August 12, 2002
SUBJECT: AmEndment to the VaiE Mountain Schaol Development Plan and associated
rezaning, conditional use permit, and hazard area amencfineni requests
located a# Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12t' and Tract C, Biack 1, VaiE
Village 12''
Applicant: VaiG Mountain School, represented by Braun and Assaciates
Planner: Russ Farrest
~
1. SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting final decisions anrf recflmmendatiflns on the various
applications that have been submitted #o recEevelap fhe Uail Mountain Schoai. It is
critical that the Planning and EnuironmentaC Commission utilize the criteria and
findings referenced in section VI of this memorandum in considering a deCision.
There are a total o# nine applications invcalved with this prapvsal. The Ptanning and
Environmental Commission should reference section 11 for a summary of those
applicatdons that the PEannimg and Environmental Commission makes a
recommendation to the Town Council an those applications where they are making a
final decision.
Since the last Planning and Environmental Commission meeting on July 22nd
meeting the applicant has:
• Created apedestrian trail from the north parking area #o the school.
• Further moved the soccer field away frarn the s#reet.
• Completed a lighting plan
• Created a pedestrian connection to the bus stop.
~
t
,
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST ~
This project involves the fallowing propertEes: ~
Parcel Curren'i Proposed Lot Siae Property
Zoning and Zoning and Qwner
Use Use
1) Lot 32 S, Block 2, Vail General Use General Use 6.1 acres Vail Mountain
Village 12th (Current (GU) Zoningl School
School Site) school,
saccer tield &
88 parking
s aces
2) Lv# 12 (applicant has AgricuEture General Use 1.28 Vail Mountain
referred to property as Open Space Zoning/ acres ' School
12N), 81ock 2 Vail Village (AOS) 12 parking (Previously
12tn (Tennis Court Site) spaces, owned by the
This site was nat properly relacated Booth Falls
subduvided and is actualiy cabin Horneawners
part of Lot 12. Associations)
3} Lat 11, Hlock 2, Vail Twa Family General Use! _408 Vail Mountain
Village 12th {lat directly Residential Saccer Field acres School
west of currerut soccer ~
field
4) Tract C, Block 1, Vail Twa Family General Use! 1.19 Vail Resorts
Village 12`h Residential 8 EHLJs & 16 acres
parking
spaces
requircd for
EHUs
~
2
1. ~
~ Praject Area
S aan ~ •
~
~r~
3~21p ~f 1 ~;7Q44 ~ ~7P3 .
R
4 7
to
" ~ ~t o ax~a
~urs ' f ia
. SR 9169 . . 3~5 ~J •3,• 1 J351 Io
S /
~ ~SSD
~353 6 al.e~s
335
~J tf . r-e .
azsJ,^~
3010
T~C' G
~
~
The foElowing is a summary af the appfications for this project:
Applicatians that the Plann'rnq and Environmental Commission will make a
recommendation on:
7) A request for a recommendation ta the Vail Town Council to rezone 3010 Baoth
Falls RaadlLot 71, Block 2, Vail Viflage 12'h Filing frorrt Two-Family Residential to
General Use;
2} A request for a recommendation to the Vail Tawn Council to rezone Lot 12, Biack
2, VaiE Village 12' Fifing to General Use, The northern portion af this lat is zonea
Agriculture Open Space;
3) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Tawn Council #o reaane Tract C,
Black 1, Vail Village 12" Fifing frQm Two-Family Residential to General Use,
4} A request far a recommendation to the Vail Tawn Council ta modify the nfficial
Town of Vail Rockfall Hazard Map to 'tndicate approved mitigation for 3160 N.
Frondage Road/Lot 12, Block 2, and Tract C, Block 1, Vaif Village 12`h Fik9ing;
~ 5) A request for a recommendation to amend the official Town of Vail Land Use
Map for Tract C, Black 1, Vail Village 12'h Filing frorn Low Qensity Residentoal to
Publicf5emi-Public;
3
,
Applications that the Plannina and Environrnenta! Commission will make a decision ~
on:
6) A request for an arriendment to the previously approved develapmen# plan and a
new canditianai use perrnit for a private educatianal onsti#ution and an active
outdaor recrea#ian area an 3010 Boath Falls Road/Lot 11, Black 2, Vail Village 12t'
Filing and 3160 N. Frontage Road East/ Lat 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing;
7} A request for a conditianal use permit to aflow far the constructiQn of eight Type
Ill EHUs located an Tract C, Blcack 1, 1Jail Village 12th Filing;
8} A request for a for a conditional use permit to con#inUe to allow for the existing
temporary modular classroom s#ructures located at 3160 N. Frontage Road EasU a
part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12' Filing;
9) A request for a major subdirrision and preliminary plat approval for the Vail
Mountain School Subdivision, A resubdivision of Lots 11, 12, Tract C, and Katsos
Ranch FZoad, Vai! Viflage 12t' Filing in accordance with Title 13, Chapter 3, Vail
TQwn Code, and setting forkh details in regards thefeto. The Tvwn Council will
afso need to accept the dedication of land and approve of the subdivision.
lIL BAGKGROUND
A. 2000 Vail Mountain School Master Plan ~
On June 81h, 1999, the Vail Tnwn Councii discussetf Planning and Environmental
Commission's decision to approve a conditional use permit (GONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT) to aAlow for the addition of a tempvrary classraam structure at the Vail
Mountain Schoal. The Cauncil agreed the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT could be
extended for an addi4ional year if the applicant presented a master pian to the
Council within one year. On April 24th, 2000 the Vail Mountain Schaol received
approval for a develapment pfan (rr?aster plan) and a conditional use permit far the
expansion of #he school facilities, ineluding eight Type III er-nployee housing units.
Attachment A summarizes the development parameters that were approved far the
master plan.
The Vail Mountain School Master Plan invafves significant improverrtents canstructed
in two separate phases,
Phase I(June 2040-JuEy 2001) improvements include:
- Qemolition af the rockfall mitigation berm
¦ Removal of the existing temporary classroam structure
¦ Canstruction of an eight-classroom wing to the north of the existing building
- An eleuatar cannection ta all flaors
¦ Reconfiguration of the existing access and parlcing area to alaow for the addition
of a udrop off' lane and additional parking.
Phase II lan -term irn rovements include: ~
- Addition of a 300-seat auditorium
¦ Faculty housing
4
~ ¦ Additional classraoms south of the gyrnnasium
¦ Additional parking
It is important to note that the proposed 2002 develflpment plan and the approved
2000 master plan propose the same number of students (330 students) and 28 c9ass
rooms. The 2002 proposal does include a larger auditorium (400 seats versus 300).
The total flmor area is approximateay 31,993 square feet larger than the 2000 master
plan. Parking (116 spaces) and employee housing is proposed to be the same for i
the 2002 application and the 2000 master plan given that the number af students j
and facuEty will remain the same. ~
B. History of the Praperty
The fal6ov,ring is a brief synopsis of Vail Mountain School develnpment over the last
20 years:
1972 - VaEi Village 12Ih Filing was annexed into the Tawn of Vail and platted,
This subdivisian plat shaws Lot 12 at 8.65 acres in size.
1972-At the #ime ofi annexation Agriculture 4pen Space zoning was applied
to Lat 12. The tatal area of the parcef was 8.66 acres. The minimum lot size
of the Agriculture C7pen Space zone district is 35 acres.
1979 -Vail Resorts eonveyed the Tenrris Court site ta the Boath Falls
F#omeawners fhraugh a quick claim deed,
1979-the first two story buibding was constructeti an the site.
1980-Vail Resorts conveyed the fand the school is vn taday to the Vail
Mountain Schaol.
1979 - Original 2-story building constructed
1984 - North ciassrooms and rockfall berm constructed (berm is na langer
necessary)
~ 1989 - Gymnasium and stage additian corostrueted ~
1992 - Additional stary added to existing building
1995 - Library expansion
1999 - 7emporary classroorn structure constructed
IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BQARDS
Order of Review; Generalfy, applications wifl be revrewed firsf 6y the Planning
and Enuironmentaf Corrrmission for accepfabilr'ty of use and fhen by the Design
Review Board for compliance of pr'opvsed buildings and site pfanning.
A. Major Subdivision
Planninq and Environmental Commission:
Action. The Planning and Envrrenmental Commission is responsible for final
approval/approval wifh condi#ions/denial of a major su6dlvrsion. Specifically the
the code states:
~ The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to show that the application
is in compliance with the in#ent and purposes of this Chapter, the Zoning
Ordinance and other pertinent regulafions that the Planroirtg and
I ~
~
Environmental Commission desms applicabCe. Due cansideration shall be ~
given fio the recammendations made by pubGc agencies, uti6ity companies
and ather agencies cansulted under subsection 13-3-3G above. The
Pfanning and EnWironmental Commission shall review the application and
consider its appropriateness in regard to Tawn policies relating to
subdivision controE, densities prapased, regula#ions, ardinances and
resolutions and other applicable documents, environmental integrity and
compatibility with the surrounding land uses and ather applicable
documents, effects vn the aesthetics ofi the Town. (1997 Code: ard.
2(19$3) § 1
B. Conditional Use Permit
Plannin and Environmental Cammission:
Ac#ion: The Planning and Environmental Commission is r'esponsikale for final
approval/approval uvith canditions/denial of a conditional use permit. The Planning
and Enviranmental Commission will rnake recommendations ta the To+,vn Council on
rezoning land, text amendrnents, and rnadrfication vf hazard designatiQns. i
The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for evaluating a '
propasal for:
1. Relationship anci impact of the use on development objectirres of the Town.
2. Effect of the use nn Iight and air, distribution of population, transportation ~
facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public
facilities and public facilities neecis.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestifln, automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and cantreC, access, ;
rnaneuverability, and remaval of snow fram the streets and parking areas.
4. Effect upan the character of the area in which the praposed use is to be
located, including the scafe and bulk of the proposed use in 6elation ta
surrounding uses.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the
praposed use.
6. The enWironmental irnpact report concerning the proposed use, if an
enviranmental impact repart is required by Ghapter 12 af this Title.
The Planning and En+rironmerttai Commission is alsa respansible for prescrkbing the
development parameters an General Use zoned fand and ensuring the develapment
parameters conform to approved zoning in ather zane disfricts. The development
parameters that must be considered include;
• Lot area ~
• Setbacks
• Building Height
G
f-
~ • Density
• GRFA
• Site caverage
• Landscape area
• Parking and loading
• fVlitigatian of deve{opment impacts ~
C. Design Review Board Application
Desiqn Review Board: ;
The Design Review Board has no review authorify on a conditional use permit, but
mcast rerriew any accompanying Design Review Baard application.
The Design Review Board is responsible for e+ralraating the aesign Review Board
propasal far:
• Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundirags
• Fitting buildings into landscape
~ • Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography
+ RemavallPreservation of trees and native vegetation
• Adequate pravision f4r snow storage 4n-site ;
0 AcceptabiEity af building materia[s and colors
• Aceeptabi4ity of roQf elements, eaves, overhangs, and ather building farrns
• Provis'ron of landscape and drainage
* Prowision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures
• Circulatian and access to a site including parking, and site distances
~ 0 Location and desagn af satellite dEShes
I
' + Prowision of outdoor lighting
• The design af parks
D. Staff:
The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and
plans conform to the technicaR requirements of the Zoning ReguFations. The staff ~
alsa advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines.
Sta# provides a staff mema containing background on the properky and prQWides a
i staff evaluation o# the project with respect ta the required eriteria and findings, and a
7
f
recommendation on approval, appraval with conditions, or denial. StafF aIso ~
facilitates the review process.
E. Rezoning, MajQr Subdivision
Town Cauncil;
;
The Town Cauncil is the finaf decision rnaking au#hority far a rezaning or a fejct
arnendment. Final actions of Design Reuiew Board or {'lanning and Enviranmental
Commission rnaybe appealed to the Town Gouncil or by the Town Council. Town
Gouncil evaluates whether or not the Planning and EnviTOnmental Commission ar
Design Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, upho[d with
modifications, or ouertum the baard's decisiQn. The Town Council is alsv
responsibfe for accepting land for pubRic right af way in a Major SubdivisPan,
V. SUMMARY OF PLANNING AND ENVtRQNMENTAL COMMISSION & DESIGN
REVIEW 130ARD 1NPUT June 1 Q'h 2002 Plarcninu and Environmental Commission MeetinQ
+ The Planning and Enviranmental Commission asked that a sensitive lighting plan
be developed. ~
• Make the parking on Tract C more consalidated. ~
~ There was sorne interest in maving the Headmasfers Nause onto Tract C. ,
• The Planning and Enaironrrriental Commission wanted to see a management plan
for the EHUs to show how the units would be used by emplvyees af #he schaol.
• There was a comment ta move Katsns Road fur#her tca the East to create mare
space for the school.
• There was a comrnent t4 subdivide the headmaster's house fram the rest of #he
schaol and recreational field.
• There vvas a nesd for additianal inforrr}ation on retaining walls and grade
changes.
• Create enclased parking tor EHUs on Tract C i
• There was concern expressed about the uan parking on Tract C. ~
~ There was agreement with Design Review Board that the height Qf the '
gymnasium could be reduced.
~ There was general support that EHUs Qn Tract C were appropriate.
• There uvas soene concern about the awerall mass of the schaol.
• Some members did not support an amendment to add the 425 credit to the
Agriculture Open Space Zane Distriet.
July_8`h 2002 Planninq and Environmental Commission hlleetinq
~ The Planning and Enviranmental Commission asked the applicant to rezone the
tennis court area to either General Use or 5ingle Family Residential. There was
agreerrient thaz a more appropriate zoning shauld be used for the headmaster's ~
house and the soccer field.
8
~ • The majority af Planning and Environmental Commission indicated that they would nat support a text amendrraeni far the Agriculture Open Space zone district
to accammodate a 425 GRFA crettit.
• The Planrring and Environmental Gornmissian did not approve of parking an the
Fron#age Rd for overflow parking.
• There was some interest from #he Planning and Environmental Commissian in
pursuing even# parking at #he Booth Falls trailhead.
• The Planning and Environmental Cammission wanted to see a sensitive lighting
p[an for the project. ~
* The Planning and Environmental Commission stated that the fence beside the
saccer field must be moved at least 10 feet from the edge of asphalt of Booth ~
Falls Raad.
• Several rnect,,bers af the Planning and Environmental Cnmmission comrnented
that the school was addressing their cancerns and rnovirag in the right direc#ion.
Also the new pian was similar to the plan approved in 2000 in that the school
would be accvmmodating the same number of students arad would have the
same numbsr of staff,
• Planning and Environmental Commission heard testimony from adjacent ~
neighbors tha# the school was sfidl #oo big antf #hat the height shauld be further
reduced to minirnize the visual impact of the schaol_ There was tes#imflny
regarding the need to remove parlcing from Tract G. Also lightirrg was a critical
issue neighbvrs were cQncerned about. There were also camments that the
school needed fo improve trash removal and clean-up of the grounds. A Ietter
~ fram Winston Associa#es was provided to the Planning and Environmental
Commission by several Katsos Ranch neighbors that outlined their position an
the project and recommenc(ations for Tract C.
July 22`ld 2002 Planninq and Environmental Commission Meetinq
• The Planning and Environmental Commission asked #hat a pedestrian trail be '
created between the north parking lot and the schoo9.
• The Planning and Environmental Commission asked that a MC3U be crea#ed to
facilitate parking an the Booth Creek Trail Head for special events in the winter.
+ Planning and Environmental Commission asked that the bus stop be moved tQ
the sauth side af the bus turn in.
• Planning and Environmental Commissian asked that the Soccer Field be moued
further from the road.
i
June 5T"_2002 Desiqn Review Board Meeting I
• The Design Review Board was very supportive of #he architectural forrn of the
building. Specifically they Ifked the harizontal and vertical variation in the ciesign.
• The Design Review Board liked the contrast in the use af materials and that
seweral roof materials would be considered_
• The Design Review Board requested that the applicant look at sinking the
~ gymnasiurn to reduce the height of this eIemeret to address concerns from
adjacent property owners. !
9
i
_ i
• The Design Review Board expressed concem regarding any impact to the aspen ~
stand on Tract C.
• Tne Design ReWiew Board asked to see a very sensitive lighting plan. The Board
asked that 9ow level ballard lighting be used.
• 1 he Design Reuiew Board asked the applicant ta consider structured parking
underneath the saccer field which cauld enable the parking to be reduced on
Tract C.
• The Design Reuiew Baard warated to make sure that the applicant wouid have
adequate larodscaping. They were concerned that much of the landscaping was '
on Coforado DeparEment of 7ransporta#ian right-af-way and wanted to make sure
that they ceuld plant that material.
• Design Review Board asked thaf a gate be considered for Tract C to prevent non ~
school related traffic from parking in tha# lot.
• Design Review Board asked whether a porte-cochere was needed #or the
entrance to the schaol.
• The Board inquired whether there was adequate space for Ivading ancf deliwery.
~
,
~
~
~
'
10
4
~
~ V!. APPLICATION CRfTERIA, FINDIMGS, STAFF RECQMMENDATIONS, AND j
CONDITiONS
A. AMENDMENT TC) THE LAND USE PLAN FOR TRACT C
~ 1) General Overview of the Plan
The TQwn of Vail Land Use Plan was initiatecf in 1985 and adapted in 1986
by the VaiB Town Council. The main purposes of the Land Use Pian are t?nro-
foid:
• To articulate the land use goals of the Town.
• To serve as a guide for decisian making by the Town. ~
i
The Town of Vail Land Use Plan is intended to senre as a basis from which
#uture land use c#eeisions rnay be made within the Town of Vail. The goals,
I as articulated within the Land Use Plan, are meant to be used as adopted
' policy guidelines in the review proeess for new development praposals. In conjunction with these goals, land use categories are defined #o indicate
general types ofi land uses which are then used ta develop the Vaii Land Use
Map. The Land Use Plan is not intended to be regulatary in nature, but is ~
intended to provide a general frarnework ta guide decisian making. Where the
fand use categories and zaning canflict, existing zoning cantrofs deaelopment
~ on asite. To be effective, the Land Use Plan must be updated to reflect
current thinking and changing market conditions. The Town of Vail Land Use
Plan can be amended in three ways:
1) The Community Development Department can update and revise
the plan periodically. The Community DerreEapment Qepartmen# then
makes recommendations for the propo5ed changes to the Planning
and Environmental Commission, where these changes waufd then be
considered in a public hearing format. The Planning and
Environmental Commission would #hen make a recommendatian to
the Town CouncMl, where anather public hearing would be held. The
Council then adapts the changes by resolution.
2) The Planning and Enviranmental Commission or Town CounciC can
also initiate amendments to the Land Use Plan. Agairr, both boards
hold pubiic hearings and the changes are adopted by the Town
Council by resolution.
3} The private sectar can afso ini#iate ameradmenfis to the Vail Land
Use PVan. Applications may be made by a registered voter, a praperty ~
owner, or a property owner's authorized representative. The ~
amendrnents aTe then heard ay both the Planning and Environmental I
Carnmission and the Town Council. The Town Council then adopts
the changes by resolution.
~
11
1
~
2) Land Use Plan 47esiqnation Qescription for Tract C
Current Land Use Plan designation far Tract e:
Low Density Residential: This category includes single-family
detached homes and two family dwelfing units. f7ensify of
development within this category would typiea!!y not exceed 3
strucfures per 6urldabfe acre; hawever, afl of the adjacenf residenfial
uses exceed 3 dwelling units per acre. Also vvithin this area would be
private recreatron facrfifies such as fenRis courts, swimrnirrg pools and
clubhouses fcrr the use of residerrts of fhe area_ Institutionallpu6lic
, uses permitted woufd inclucle churches, fire stafions, and parks and
apen space related facilities.
Propased Land Use designation:
Public%Semf-Pubfrc (PSP): The Public and semi-pu6lic cafego,ry
includes schools, posf affice, wafer and sewer service and sforage
facilifies, cemeteries, municfpal facilitles, arid ofher public institutians,
which are located throughout the communify fo serve the needs of
residents.
3) Cri#eria for amending the Town of Vail Land Use Plan ~
Any amendments to the Land Use Plan require a public process. Adjacent
praperties are no#ified, the Planning and Environmental Commission holds a
public nearing and makes a recammendation to #he Town Council on the
proposal. Yhe Town Cauncil adopts the changes by resolutian. Any changes
to the Land Use Plan must address the fallowing three criterta:
1. How conditions have changed since the plan was adopted7
Physical canditions and the fundamental land use pattems of the
neighbarhood have not changed since the 1986 acloption of the plan. I
However, the Vai1 Mountain School is proposing ta expand their program and
physicai space consistent with a dewelopment plan that was approved in
2000. Since the Land Use plan was adopted the need for emplayee housing
has significan#ly increased with only a 1% vacancy rate in the rental market in
Vail. Employee housing is a cri#ical need in the Town of Vail and any
proposed use that generates new empiayees needs to provide a reasonable ~
arrtount of housing for their emplayees.
2. How the plan is in error?
The pfan is not in errar with respect to the land use designation. However,
this land will be an integral component of the schaol's operatian, and a
PubliciSemi PubYic land use designation wili be more appropriate in the future
and will facilitate a cohesive develapment plan for the community and the ~
school.
12
I
~ 3. How the addrtian, deletion ar change to the plan is in concert with
the plan in general?
Adfacent lands are designated Public/5era-fi Public to the west ancf Low
Density Residential ta the north. This designation allvws for the creation of
associatecf housong for the school which is similar to how housing located at
Buzzard Park which supports the Tawn of Vail Public Warks operation also
with a PubliclSemi Public desigraatian. The Town of Vai1 Land Use Plan also
states on page 8 of the plan that affordable employee housing should be
made available through private efforts, assisted by iimited incentives and
additional ernployee hausing needs should be accomrnadated at +raried sites
throughout the community,n
4. StafF Recommendatian
The Gommunity Development Department recommends that the Planning
and Environmental Carnrriission forward a recommendation of approval to
the Vai[ Tawn Cauncil for the land use amendment in that it allaws for uses
consistent with adjacent land uses and the creatian of a harmonious
relationship with the adjacent residentraP and institutional uses and that this
application meets the criteria mentioned above.
B. REZUNING OF LO'fS 72, 11, AND TRACT C
~ 1. RezoninQ Criteria
Befare acting on an applicati4n for a zone district baundary amendment, the
PEanning & Environmental Cornmission and Town Cauncil shall consider #he
following faciors wiih respect to the requested zone district boundary
amendment:
1} The extent to which the zone clistrict amendment is cansistent
with ail the applicabie elements of the adopted goals, objectives
and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is
cornpatible with the derrelopment abjectives of the Town. I
Lots 11 and 12 have a PubliclSemi Public Land Use PEan
Designatian. Rezoning Lot 11 and the northern area of Lat 12 will
increase the confarmance to #he Vaif Land Use Pfan. With an
arrientlment to the Land Use Plan for Tract C, the rezoning of Tract C i
to General Use zone district would be cansistent with the
Cornprehensive Plan, The affordable housing on firact C is an ~
integral part of the schaol an Lot 12.
2) The extent #o which the zane district amendment is suitable with
the existing and patential land uses on the site and existing and
potential surrounciing land uses as set out in the Town's ado,pted
~ planning documenxs.
A school in a residential neighborhood is suitable and can wark well
togefiher. Schoals are typically located in residential areas. The
13
f
school has been lacated on Lot 12 since 1980. There has been a ~
relatively harmonious relationship between the schoal and the
adjacent neighborhoad. The lacation of school employee housing on
firact C is also consistent with the adjacen# neighborhoad_ Tract C
currently has a zoning of Two Family Residential. With that zoning,
the lot could be subdivided irrto three parceEs and have approx9mately
15,000 square feet af gross residential floor area. The school is
proposing 2 structures with 8 employee housing units for a grand total
af 7,280 sq, ft. of gross residential floar area.
3) The extent ta which the zane district amendment presents a
harmonious, convenient, workable reNationship among land uses
cansistent with munic'rpal development ahjectives.
The propased rezoning af the en#ire area of Lat 92 as General Use
creates a mare workable relationship amang land uses and corrects
an error that occurred in 1979 when that land was improperly
subt#ivided and conveyed to another owner. LQt 11 which is now
owned by the Vail Moun#ain Schaol should be rezoned to General
Use since the use of the property will be a schoof. This lot has been
surraunded by school land and lhis rezaning creates a more
harmonious workable rela#ianship with the Vait Mountain Schools
development plans. Tract C will continue to have a residential use
that is interconnected with the school. The proposed housing an ~
Tract C in relatianship with the circulation pian for t!he schoo1 wrll
reduce traffic on Katsos Ranch Road. These rezanings essentially
consolidate the 9and on and around the school inta the same zone
dis#rict (General Use) and creates a more workable relationship for
the school's develapment plans and allaws the impacts of the school
to be effectively mitigated to the e7ctent passible.
4} The extent #o which the zone district amendment provides #or the I
grawth of an orderly viabfe community and daes not consxitute
spot zoning as the amendment serves the best interests af the
eommunity as a whole.
By rezoning the northern area of Lots 12 and 11 to the General Use
Zone District there is increased conformity to the Land Use Plan since
the designation for this iand is PubficlSemi Public. With the
amendment ta the Land Use Plan for Tract C to PubliclSemi Public
and fhe development af housing an the site for the school that I amendment will also serve the iraterests of the community as a vuhole
by having an ernployer pravide housing for a portion af the new
employees that would be generated by the prolect.
5) The extent to which the zone district amendment results in
adverse or benefcial impacts on the natural environment,
including but not limited #o water quali#y, air quaFity, noise, ~
aegetation, riparian carridors, hillsides and other desirable
natural features
i
14
!
P
I
~
An Enviranmental Impact Report was prepared for this praposal. No
significant environrnental impacts were identifiied in the report. There
are existing trees that wauld be removed as the result of the praject.
Appraximately 334 aspens and 40 evergreens. Hawever, the
landscape plan helps mitigate that gmpact. The appiicant is
proposing to add 445 deciduous trees and 250 evergreen 3rees to the
site as part of th@ landscaping plan.
fi) The extent to which the zone district amendment is consistent ~
vwith the purpose statement of the proposed zane district.
The purpase statement of the General Use Zone District is defined in
5ection 12-9C-1, Vail Town Code, and reads as follows:
„The general use disfrict fs infended to pravide sites forpublic
and quas!-publiG uses which, because of fheir special
characterisfics, cannot be approprrately regufafed by the
development sfandards prescribed for other zoning clistricts,
and for wvhich clevelopmenf standards especially prescribed for
each partrcular develapment proposal ar praject are necessary
#a achieve the purposes prescribed rn section 92-9-2 af t,his
fitJe and to provid'e for the public welfare. The Geraeral Use
~ Drsfricf is irafended to ensure fhat public buildings and graunds
and certain types of quasi-public uses permitted in the disfrrct
are appropriafely locafed and desigrred to meet the needs of
residents arrd visitars to Vail, to ftarmanize with surrourrd'rng
U5E5, and, in the case of buildings and other struetures, to
ensure adequa#e lighf, air, open spaces, arad ather amenifies
appropriate to the permitted types of uses. (Ord. 21(1994) §
10)"
A school is a public or quasi public use whieh does have special
needs. The development plan pracess Rrovided for in the General
Use zane helps ensure that the praposed develc,pment is in harmony
with the adjaeent uses and that the potenxial impacts vf the buiiding
are adequately mitigated.
7) The extent to which the zone district amendrMent demonstrates
haw conditians have changed sfrrce the zoning designation of
the subject praperty was adapted and is n+a longer appropriate.
With regard to Lo#s 12 and 11, the proposed rezoning addresses an
error that was made in 1979 when the narthern portion af Lot 12 was
canveyed to another awner. in addition, #he school has surrounded
Lot 11 making a residential ckevelapment on that site difficult at best.
With regard to Tract C, an increased need for emplayee housing has
~ resulted in the East 20 years. I# is now a matter of policy that when an
emplayer generates new employees that ihey need to accommadate
housing for a percentage of those new emplQyees. Also employers
are finding it necessary to provide ernployee housing to recruit high
IS
quality employees. Therefore, staff believes that the eight proposed
EHUs are an integral and necessary component of the school.
8) Sucit other factors and criteria as the Commission andlar
Council deem applicable to the propased rezoning.
3. Necessary F[ndings:
Before recammending andlor granting an approval of an application for a
zone district bountiary amendment the Planning & Environmental
Commission and the Town Council shall make the faflowing findings with
respeet to the reques#ed amendment:
1) That the amendment is consistent with the adapted goafs, objectives
ancf policies autlined in the Vail Camprenensive Plan and compatible
with the developmen# objectives of the Tawn.
2} That the amendment is compatible with anc{ suitable to acfjacent uses
and appropriate for the surrounding areas.
3} That the amendrnent promotes the health, safety, morals, and
general welfare af the 7ov+rn and pramotes the coordinated and
harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves
and enhances its natural enviranment and its established character
as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. +
4. Staff Recammendation
The Cammunity Development Department recommends that the Planning
and Envrronmen#al Commission farwarcE a recommendation of approval for
the rezoning of Lots 11 and 12„ Block 2, Vail Village 12`h and Tract G, Block 1,
Vail ViClage 12 'h and that the propased amendments are consistent with the
criteria and findings described above.
C. C4NQITIONAL USE PERMIT(S) FCiR DEVELUPMENT PLAN, EEGHT EHUs ON
TRAGT C, ANt} IVIAIN7'AINING THE MODULAR STRUCTURES C?dV THE SITE.
1. Criteria for a Conditional Use Permit
1) Relationship and irnpact of the use on the development objectives of
the Town.
The Vail Land Use Plan applies a°PubliclSemi-Pubfic" land use designatian
on this property. This category includes uses such as schaals, post office,
water and sewer service and storage facilities, cemeteries, municipal
facilities, and other institutions which are located throughout the community to
senre the needs of residents.
Staff belierres this proposal is in compCiance with all applicabfe objectives of ~
the `Jail Land Use Plan. StafF believes the proposal furthers the following
specifc goals:
16
1.1 Uail shvuld eontinue to grow ir? a controiled environment, maintaining
a balance between residential, comrnercial and recreational uses to
serve both the uisitar and the permanent resident,
1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded
whenever possib{e.
1.12 Vail shauld accommodate most of the edditional grawth in existing
developed areas (infill areas),
5.1 Additiona[ residential growth should continue to accur primarily in
existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high
hazards do not sxist.
i
5_3 AfFordable employee housing should be made availaale thraugh
private effQrts, assisted by IirraEted incentives, provitlecf by the Town of
Vail wi4h appropriate restrictions.
5.4 Residential grourth should keep pace with the marketpEace derrnands
for a full range of housing types.
5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and
upgraded. Additional emplayee housing needs should be
~ accommodated at varied sites thraughQUt the cvmmunity.
6.1 Services shoufd keep pace with 9ncreased growth.
With relationship to the conditional use permit for the temporary structures,
Sectian 12-9C-3, Vail Tawn Code allows for ternporary sfiructures subject to
the issuance of a conditianal use permi#. The Vail Town Cc+de requires the
issuance of a cancEitional use permi# far temporary structures, in part, to
irasure that adequate steps are taken to insure that the structure cvmplies
with the developmenf obtectives of the Town. The intent of allowing
temparary struetures is to accomrnodate those situations when a permanent
structure is not appropria#e or circum5tances, such as duration af use, ~
warrants a temporary structure. In the case af the Vail Mountain Schcral, staff ~
believes a temParary structure is warranted far a limi#ed period of time to ;
accammodate the immediate needs of the school while the school completes ;
constructian of the new facility. Staff belieues the two-year request is
appropriate. However, a request for an extension to the two-year tdmeframe
should not be permitted.
2) The Qffect at the use an light and air, distribution of pvpufation,
transpor#ation €aci[ities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public facilities needs.
Transportation - plcase re#er to item 3 below.
Schoats - Planned impravernents for the school wauld increase capacity to
appraximately 300 students and pravide affordable housing for teachers and
17
staff. Staff beiieves the pro,pQSal would have a significant posifive impact on ~
educational opportunities in the Vaif Valley.
Parks and Recreatican - Staff believes the proposed auditorium faciPity could
be a valuable amenity to Vail residents if managed via a publiclprivate
partnershrp. The applicant has expressed a desire to provide opportunities
for pub{ic events at the auditorium when schaol-re[ated functions are nat
planned. The redevelopment of the soccer field will also provide recreational
apportunities for the cornrnunity.
The requested conditional use permi# for the temporary structures will have
positive effects on the imrriediate needs of the school to meet growing
dernands. The temparary classroorns will allow the school to provide
educational opportunities for up to 18 additional students. .
~
3.Effect upon traffic with particular reference to cangestion, automotiVe
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
rrmaneuverability, and removal of snow fram the stree# and parking
areas.
The applicant has completed a trafftc impact assessment. This study
coraciudes that traffic on Ka#sos Ranch Road will be reduced. Traffic on
Booth Creek Road will not be increased significantiy and the traffic consuftant ~
has concluded that additiarral turning lanes are nat requered. Adjacent fields
and apen space will provide more than the 30% af the parking area far snow
storage. However, the applicant needs to identify srtow storage for the EHU
parking and the north parking lot.
With the change in circula#ion of the parking area and with the eigFrt EHUs on
Tract C a net decrease in traffic will occur on Katsos Ranch Road.
4.Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be Ivcated, including #he scale and bulk of the proposed use in reiation
to surrounding uses.
The proposed structures are larger than the 2000 devefopment plan with
approximateiy 87,300 square feet of gross floar area versus approximately
55,390 square fee# of floor area approued in the 2000 master plan, which is
nearly 58% inceease in floor area. It is important to nQte that the Vai]
Mountain Schoal has increase its land area from 6.1 acres to 9.18 acres.
That is an appr4ximately 50% increase in total lot area. The applicant is
attempting to articulate the building to reduce the perceived bulk and mass of
the building. However, this is stoll a large structure for this area of Vail.
The proposed EMUs are compatikale in scale +nrith ather adjacent uses. The
total flaor area of #he EHUs is 6ess than if the lot was fully developed for
duplex devefapmerat under the Two Family ResicGential Zone District.
With regard to the conditional use permit for the temparary structures, s#aff ~
believes that due to the exterior improvements of the structures, the location
2s
af the structure on the schoal site, and the temparary nature of the building,
the temporary classroom wiil have minimal, if any negative impacts an the
character of the area.
i
~
~
~
2. Findinqs for Canditional Use Permits '
i
The Planning & Environmenta! Commission shafl make the foilowing findings ~
before granting a conditional use permit:
That the proposed locatian of the use is irr accordance with the
~ purposes of fhe conditional use permit sectivn of the zaning code and
the purposes of the district in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use ancf the conditions under which
it woufd be operated or maintained would not be detrimerttaf to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties ar
improvements in the vicinity_
3. That the proposed use would comply +,vith each ot the applrcable
provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. I
3. Staff Recommendations and Conditions ~
~
The aepartment of Gomrr3unity Development recommerads that the Planning
and Environmental Comanission approve of the proposed conditional use
permits, based upon the abave mentioned criteria and findings referenced
above, for:
* The Develapmen# Plan
• 8 EHUs on Tract C
• Cantinued use of mot{ular trailers
I If #he Planning and Errvironmental Commission chooses to apprave of these
conditional use permits, staf# would recommend the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide the Town of Vail wath an easement for the
existing pub[ic bus stap a# the southwest corner of the property prior
to building permit submittaf.
2. The applicant shall provide the Town of Vail with drainage easements
in accordance with the propased grading and drainage pEans. These
easements shall be recorded prior ta the issuance of a temporary
certyficate of occupancy or certificate of oecupancy far any praposed ~
development an the site.
~ 3. Prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or a
Certificate of Occupancy fvr any phase caf the school, t'he appfican#
shall complete and receive a Certificate af Occupancy for the eight
19
~
employee housing units constructed on Tract Cexcept for the ~
occupancy of the cabin.
4. All housing units an Tract C shall be deed-restricted as Type III
errap9oyee housing units. These units must be canstructed in
conjunc#ion with the approved development plan. Required Type Ill
deed-restrictians shall be recarded by the applicant with the Eagle
County CEerk Recorder prior to the issuance of any temporary
certificate of occupancy or certificafe of occupancy for develQprnent of
the schfloL The employee housing units shall compfy with the
minimum requirements for Type III empioyee housing regulations, as
defined in Chapter 12, of #he Vail Town Cade.
5. The bicycle/pedestrian path shafl be constructed by the appficant as ~
per the approved develaprnent plan. Canstruction shall be campleted i
prior to receiving a Temporary Certificate of C)ccupancy for the
School. An easement shall be prauided to the Town of Vail by the
applicant for the bike/pedestrian path prior to the issuanee of a
buifding permit.
6. A cash deposit shail }ae submitted to the Town of Vail by the applicant
priar ta the issuance of any building permits far 104°fa of the value of
creating a bike pathlpedestrian trail for the en#ire length of Tract C,
Bloek 1, Vail Village 12 Filling of the same quality and width as the ~
path specified in condition number 5 above and raiore specifically
described in the Deuelopment Plan.
7. Approval of the conditional use permit for the develapment plan is ,
conditioned upan the rezartirtg of Lats 12 and 11, Block 2, Vail Vilfage 12th Filing to the General Use District arad appraval o# a final plat. ~
8. The conditianal use permit for the modular struetures shall be nuVl and
void two years from the approwal of the eontlitianal use permit for the
two madular structures. This canditional use permit is ualid anly for ~
the current rtumber and location of the existing modular structures as
of the date of this approval.
9. The Vail MountaiR School shall not use any public right of way for
I parkong.
10. A debris flaw berm shauld be designecf and constructed prcor the
locatian of the cabin an the northern porkion of !ot 12. A qualified
engineer or geaRogist shall conclude in a writtert letter to the
Community Development Department fhat the berm wi61 adequately
protect the cabim tram a debris flow with out atJwersely impacting
private or public property.
I
11. The applicant shalp verify with a qualified lighting expert that ~
lurninance for a11 types of exterior lighting da not exceed 125. The
applicant shall submit a repor# to the Town that the Iighting cvrnpfies
20
~ with the Town's development standards, prior to the issuance of a
Temparary Gertifieate of Occupancy.
12. The appl4cant shalf submit revised cievelopment plans to the Town
identifying adequate snaw storage for the north parking area and the
parEcing area for Tract C prior to the issuance o#' final Design Review
Board apprauaE.
D. Hazard Plan Amendment:
1. Griteria for Hazard Amendment
5pecitic criteria for amending the Master Hazard Plans are not provided in the
cocle. Howeuer, #he purpose statement of Chapter 12-21 and provisions for
~ providing mitigation far development specified in Section 12-21-15-C.1 of the Vail
Town Code do provide criteria for a decisian ta amend the hazard master plan.
The following are the recommended criteria for making an amendmen# to the ~
ha,zard plans:
't) That the mitigation svpports the purpose statement of section 12-21
which states in part "The purpose of this Chapter is to help pratect the
~ inhabitants of the Town from dangers relating to develapment of flood
plains, avalanche paths, steep slopes and geologically sens'ttive
areas...."
Bassd on the review of the rr3i#igation by qua[ified professiona6s the mitigation
will help protect the inhabitants of the Tawn fram dangers relating to
geologieally sensitive areas.
2) That the carrectiwe engineering or enginecred construction or ather
mitigatron or afternations can be accomplished ta reduce the danger to i
the public health and safety to property #o a reasonable level.
Based on #he engineering design of #he rockfall berm and the review af the
construction by qualified engineers, staff believes that the roGkfaH hazard is
reasonably mitigated, Dr Bruce Collins a qualified geologist has concluded
that the mitigation will be effective in protecting the northeastern porkian of Lvt
12 and Tract C.
3} Such mitigatian does nat increase the hazard to othez prapeety or
structures or to public buildings, roads, streets, rights of way,
easements, utilities or tacilities.
Based on reliable engineering input the mitigation will not impac# other
property or structures, or public buildings, roacfs, streets, rights of way,
'f easernents, utilities ar fac'rlities.
f ~
4) The applicant must establish by clear and convincing euidence that
the information contained in the site specifie geaJogical investigatian is
21
I
I
l
reliable. ~
The rockfall berr'n has been reviewed by a qualified gealogist and Bruce E
Collins has concluded that the mitigation wiil effectively protect Lat 12 and
Tract C.
2, StafF Recarn,mendation:
Tfie Gommunity Development Department recomE-nends that the Planning
and Environmental Commission forward a recarnmendativn of approval to the
Ta+,vn Council of an amendment to the Rackfall Hazard Map to show
approved rnitigation on L.ot 12, Block 2, Vai! Village 12th Filling and 7ract C,
Block 1, Vail Village 12 'h Filing.
E. MAJOR SUB[?IVISiON
1. General Overview of a Maior Subdivision
Title 13, Subdavision Regulations, of the Vail Tawn Code esfablishes the i
review pracess and criteria for a rnajor subdivision proposed in the Town of
Vail. Pursuant ta Chapter 13-3 (Major Subdivision) of the Town Gode, the
first step in the review process is far the applicant to meet with a Tawn
Planner to discuss the preliminary plan. Staff has met with the applicant on ~
several occasians to discuss the proposal and add6ess subrnittaf
requirements. Staff feels the applicant has successfully camplied with the
initial step in the reView process.
The Town af Vail is required ta notify the falEowing agencies that a major
subdivision is proposed and that preliminary plans are availabie for reWiew;
a. Department of Public WarkS.
b. Town Fice Departmen#.
c. Town Poiice aepartment.
d. Public Service Campany of Colorado.
e. Holy Cross E[ectric Association.
f. U.S. Vlfest j
g. Cablevision campany serving #he area.
h. Natianal Forest Service.
i, Eagle River Water and Sanita#ian District.
j. Vail Recreation District.
k. Eagle County pmbufanee Disfrict.
E, Other inferes#ed agencies when applicable.
The next step in the review process shalk be a formaf consideration of the
preliminary plan by #he Town of Vail Planning and EnVironmental
Cammission. The appiicant shall make a presentativn to the Planning and ~
Enviranmental Corrimission at a regularly scheduled meeting. The
presentatian and pubfic heanng shall be in accordance with Section 12-3-6 af
the Vail Town Code. The applican#'s appearance before the Planning and
22 I
- ~
~ .
~ Environmental Commission today shall seNe to rneet the public hearing and
presentation requirement.
The burden af proaf that the applicatian is in compliance with the infient and
purpases of the Zoning Code and other pertinent regulations shall lie upan
the applicant
In reviewing #he preliminary plan, the Planning and Environmental
Commission shall reuiew the applieatEOn and consider its appropriateness in
regaed ta Town palicies relating ta:
1. Subdivision Cantrol;
2. Densities proposed,
3. Regulations;
4. Qrdinances, resolutians and nther applieable documents;
5. Environmentallrrtegrity;
6. Compatibility with surrounding land uses; and
7. EfFeets upon the aesthetics af the Town and surraunding land uses.
The Planning and Enviranmen#al Commission shal[ have twenty-ane days
from the date of the review of the prelirninary plan to apprave, disapprave ar
approve with conditions or m4dificatians, the major subdivision request.
Within ten days of making a decisiort on the request, the staff shall forward
~ the Plartning and Environmental Comrnission's decision to the Vail Town
Council. The Council may appeal the Planning and Environmental
Commission's actian. The appeai must be placed within seuen#een days of
Planning and Environmental Corrtmissian's action. If the Cauncil appeals #he
Planning and Envirorrmental Commissian's aetion, the Council shall hear
substantialiy the same presentation by the applicant as was heard at the
Planning and Environrnental Commission pubRic hearAng. The Council shall
have thirty days to affirm, reverse, or affirm with modifications the Planning
and Environmeratal Commission decisian. The appeal hearing shail be held
during a regularly seheduled council meeting.
The final step in the review process of a major subdiWision request, after
Planning and Environmental Commission preliminary plan review, is the
revie+rv af the final pla#. A# any time within one year after the Planning and
Environmental Commission has taken action on the preliminary plan, a final
pia# shall be subrnitted tv the Tovun of Vail Cammunity Develapment
Department. The staff shall schedule a final review of #he final plat. The final
review shall occur at a reguParly scheduled Planning and Environmental
Commission public hearing. The rewaew cri#eria for a final plat are the sarrae
as those used in reviewing the prefminary plan as contained in Section 13-3-
4 of the Subdivision Regulations.
The Town of Vail has the ability tQ require certain improvements when
I approving a major subdivision. The follovuing improvements shall be required
~ by the applicant unfess otherwise waived by the zoning administrator,
Planning and Environmental Commission, or Gouncil:
1. Paved streets and parking lots;
23
2. Bicycle and pedestriara path linked with the #own system and within the ~
subdivision itself;
3. Traffic cantral sFgns, signais or devices;
4. 5tree# lights;
5. Landscaping;
6. Water lines and fire hydrants;
7. Sanitary sewer lines;
8. Storm drainage improvements and storm sewers;
9. Bridges and culverts;
10. Electric lines;
11. Telephone lines;
12, Natural gas lines;
13. Qther improvernents not specificafly mentioned above but found
necessary by the Town EnginEer due to the nature of the subdivision.
2. Criteria for Review
SeGtfon 13-3 of the Town af Vail Gode provides the criteraa by which a
proposed major subdivisian is ta be reviewecl. Sectian 13-3-4: Commissr'on
Review of.4pplication; Criterra states:
The burden af preo# shalf rest with the applicant to show that the
, applicatian is in compEiance with the intent and pUrposes of this ~
Chapter, the Zoning Qrdinance and otfier pertinent regulations that
the Planning and EnvironrE-iental Commission cieems applicable. Due
consideratian shall be given ta the recammendations made by public
agencies, utility companies and other agencies consulted under
subsectian 13-3-3C above. The Planning and Environmental
Cornmissican shalP review the appfication and consider its
apprapriateness in regard ta Town policies relating ta subdivisivn
cantrol, densities prvposetl, regulations, ordinances and resafutions
and Qther applicable documents, environmental integrity and
compatibility with the surrounding land uses and other applicable
documents, effects an the aesthetics of the Town,
1) Subdivision Cantrol
There are two lots being pla#ed as part of this major subdivision
request:
Lot Zonin Lo# Sixe Fronta e
Lot 12 General 347,828 sq ft. 950 ft on
Use the
Frontage
Rd.f680 ft
on Boath
Creek Rd.
Trac# C Genera! 52,010 sq ft 36{] f# on ~
Use Frontage
Rd
24
~
Lot 1 is pcoposed to be zoned to the Housing Zone District. According
ta Sec#ion 12-61-10: Other Developmenf Standards:
Prescribed By Pfanning and E'nvironmertfa! Commrssion: !n
the H Qisfricf, deveJopment standards in eacfr af the following categvries shall be as proposed by the ap,pficant, as
prescri6ed by the Planning and Environmental Cornmrssion,
and as adopted on the approved develapment plan:
A. Lot area and sife dimensions,
8. Building height.
C. Density control (incluafing gross residential floor area).
Therefore, the Planning and Environmental CommissiQn shall
prescribe the minimum lot size and frontage requirements. Staff
believes that the loi size. and the frontage are appropriate in this
SUadIVIsIon,
2) Densities Proposed
~ Density does no# apply to EHUs or a school
3) Regulations
Bath lots 11, 12, and Tract C are proposed ta be zoned General Use.
The General Use District requiTes an approved development plan in
conjunctian with development on the site. The rezcaning 6s contingen#
on the Planning and Environmenta! Commission's approval of the
development plan.
4) Ordinances, resolutions and other applicable documents
In reviewing this praposal, staff relied upon the Town Cflde and the
Vail Land Use Plan. The issues relating to the Tawn Code have been
addressed previously.
5) Environmental Integrity
The VaFI Mountain School does haWe a rock fall hazard and a medium
seWerity debris flow an the northwest comer of the site. The rnckfall
hazard has been mitigated by the existing rockfall berm. A qualified
genlogist has concfuded that the berm daes mitigate the rockfall
hazard on all area5 of Tract C and Lot 12. The geoEogist, Dr. Col[ins,
aPscr recammends the construction of a debris fl+aw berm on the
~ northwest corner of the site. A conditi4n of appravai is recommended ,
above to ensure this occurs if the cahin is located in the northwest
corner of the site_
25
6) Compatibility with ather adjacent Land Clses i
Compatibility with adjacent land uses is described above. The Vail
Mountain Schot?I has been located on the site since 1979 and has
operated harmortiously with the neighborhood. The eigh# EHUs are
consisfen# in bulk and mass with other adjacent residential uses. In
fact their total floor area is less than would be allowed under the
cuTrent Two Family Residential zoning.
7) Effects lJpon the Aesthetics of the 7own and Surrounding
Land Uses
The Vail Mauntain School and the eight EHUs will need to compiy
with all applicab{e Qesign RevEew Board guideliraes. There are
existing trees that woufd be removed as the result of the project.
Approximate{y 330 aspens and 40 evergreens. However, the
landscape plan helps mitigate thai impact. The applicant is
proposing to add 445 deciduous trees and 250 evergreen trees ta the
site as part af the landscaping plan.
3. Findinqs.
The foflowing findings are used for a Majar Subdivision: ~
I
1. That the applicatian is in compliance with the intent and purposes of the
Majar Subdivision Chapter, the Zonrng Ordinance and other pertinent
regulations that the Planning and Environmental Commission deems
applicable.
2. That the application is appropriate in regard to Town policies relating ta
subdivision cflratral, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and
resalutions and other appiicable documents, environmental integri#y and
compatibility with the surrounding Eand uses and other applicable
documents, and effects on the aesthetics o# the Town.
4. Staff Recommendation
The Community Derrelopment Department recorximends that #he Planning
and Environrnenfal Commission approve #he preliminary plat far Vail
Moun#ain Schoal Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lots 11, 12, Tract C, and
Katsos Ranch Road, Vail Village 12t'' Filing based upon the criteria evaluated
in men#ioned above in #his merriorandum. The recammendation of approval
includes the findings mentioned above,
[n additian to the findings abave, staff recornmends the follawing condixinns:
1) Withan one year of the Planning and Environmental Cornmission`s ~
approval, the applicant shal9 submit a final pfat to the Department af
26
~ Community Development for review by the Planning and
Environmental Commission.
2) Prior to submitting afinal plat the appficant shall address all
comments of the reviewing agencies to the satisfac#ion of the said
agencies. Any comments shall be incorparated inta the final plat. .
VI. ZONING ANALYSlS
Uail Mountaira 5chool is Iocated in the General Use Zone District. Pursuant #o the Town of
Vail Zoning Regulations, the purpose of the General Use Zone Districf is to:
pro+ride sites for public and quasi-publec uses which, because of #heir special
characteristics, cannot be appropriately regulated by the deve6opment standards
preseribed for other zcaning districts, and for uwhich development standards especoally
prescribed for each particuiar development propasal ar project are necessary to
achieve the purposes prescribed in Section 12-1-2 of this Title and to provide far the
publec welfare. The General Use District is intended to ensure that public buildings
and grounds and certain types of quasi-public uses permitted in the District are
appropriately located and desbgned to meet the needs ofi residents and visitors to
1lail, to harmonize vvith surraunding uses, and, in the case of buildings and ather
structures, to ensure adequate light, a9r, oper+ spaces, and other amenities
appropriate to the permitted types of uses. (Ord. 21 (1994) § 10).
~ Sectians 1 Z-9C-2 and 12-9C-3 of the Vail Town Code outlrne the permifted and conditional
uses aJlowed in the General Use Zone District. Public and private schools and educatianal
institutians are a conditeonal use in the General Use Zone District subject to the issuance of
a conditional use permit. The Agriculture C)pen Space zone District is outlined in 12-8A of
t'he Town Code and the Twa Family ResidentiaV District is in section 12-6C.
~
27
- ~
~
Zoning Analvsis
Lat 12 antf Lot 11
Zoning: General Use
*All developmerrt standards in the GU zane district are prescribed by
fhe Planning and Environmenta! Commission
Lot Srze: 7.98 acres (Lot 12 S) or 347,826 sq. ft.
Lot 12 S & Lot 11
Existinq 2000 2002 Propvsed
Denslty: n/a nIa n/a
Setbacks:
Cabin
Side/Booth Ck Rd n/a n/a 25'
SidelEast n/a n/a 1 62'
Front/nor#h n/a nla 135'
Schopl
SidelKatsos: 90` 24' 20` ~
Frantage Rd: 76' 76' 25"
Side: Boath Creek 358' 358' 370' ~
Rear: 23' 20' 20'
Height: 27' 38' 41'
Parking: 85 116 100
S ite
Coverage: 22,427 sf (8.26°1e) 14.1°Jo 16%/55,804 sq. ft.
Landscape 71%l24E296 sq ft
Cover
Snow Starage 31 °fo for main parking
No defined storage for
ather parking
F1oor Area: 20,488 sf 55,390 87,383
S#udents 261 330 320
Faculty 43 48 4$
~
28
_ ~
i
~
~ Tract C
Zoning: Two Family Residential J Propased zoning is General Use
Lot Size: 1.194 acres or 52,010 square feet
Existing (alCowed TFR) 2002 Propased
Density: 2lsite Not counted towards density
{patential for 3 lots} 6.7 units/acre (Tatal = 8 EHUs)
Setbacks:
Side: East : 15' 138'
Side: West 15' 30'
Rear: North 20' 25'
Front: South 20' 65'
Height: 33' 33'
Parking: 2.5/unit 96
~ S ite
Gauerage: 20% 9°l0 /4,859 sq ft.
Landscape 78%/39,692
Area
Floor Area: 7385/1 lot 8,478 (EHUs excltaded from GRFA)
11,250/ 3 lots
of 15,000 total sq ft.
~
29
1
Surnmarv of Entire Project T ~
Total Area: 9,18 Acres or 399,837 sq ft.
Existinq 2000 Appraval Proposed Plan I
aensiiy: n/a $ EHU's =4 d.u.'s 8 EHU's = 4 d.u.'s
Setfaacks:
Main School BuildingSetbacks: ~
Gabin
SidelBoath Ck Rd nla n/a 25'
SPde/East n/a n/a 162'
FronUnorth n/a n/a 935'
School
SidelKatsos: 90" 24' 20'
Frontage Rd: 76' 76' 25"
5ide: Baoth Creek 358' 358' 370'
Rear: 23' 20' 20'
Faculty Hausing
Side: East 138'
Side: V'Vest 30' ~
Rear: EVarth 25'
Front: South 65'
i
Height; 27' 36' 36- 42' i
Parking: 85 spaces 116 spaces 116
+ 20 for events
S i#e
Coverage; 22,027 sf {8.26%a} 37,4$9 Sf (14.1%) 60,663 5f (15%)*
GRFA: n/a 4,800 square feet n/a
Total school 31,990 sf 55,390 sf 95,861 sf
Flaor Area:
~
30
~f
x
a
f i i ~'i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .eY~~• s ;j ~
CR'3
A
2~52~~.+~
1~1 • a ~ ~ ~ p a2 ~ rs,~.~ . _ ~
a_ a
.~:i~
- - _ ------w.~. -
~
~
~
~
I
I
!
I
I
~
I ~
. ~Y
~ C6
o
o ~
~
, ~ ~ • ~ ~ Fc
w
~
z
a
~
~
~
,
~
~
i
WP,,,Iren
~ ~ # t F ~f ~ ~ i ~a ~~~~OS NIV1NndA
~i
NTd#315'dVd
Or
- - ~
~ ~ •I
a"• ~ ~ ~ t- f
. . . ~ , . ~ . . r
• ' r 1 ~ ~ i , ~ .
, . ~ . .
.
- J
i I
, . , ~
I~°~~
i . ! I + ~ . hl Y _
. - • ~ ~ lfj~~• ~ ~ ~ s. ' ~
,
i . . . . . ..j ~ O 1;H
~
f ~
w
i . . . ~r ~ - " ~ ~ ` :r `~~lV `i~~ . , ~ . ~ '
% ~ ~ ^ i $r I t; !1
4 I
~ _ _ / .lY l'} t~~ K Y ~F Il f~I i iII~ ~ ~ - .
~-ti\ r~..' - ~ l . ' ~ i . ! , • .
4,
~ • ~ _ ~ . , ~ ~
I ~ , ~_1~~~~,~ ( ~ f • _ _ I
~ ;
: . _ .
. ,
< , , _ ; . . ,
. , .
,
; .
.
, ,
„ .
. . ~ , ;
~ . . ~
OPUWawen
100NOs NIViNnaw IIdn
Nvld 83iSVrw
~ .
r s
!
. . H. ~ / J
MATGI LPWE
' - • I _ . ~
~ r
~
i f A~r l-: I I
_ 4i
i
~ ~ ~ . . .~j ~ ? f , , ~ ~f - ~ § I ~ I
r _ ' _ i~`. -r ~ 6~ q f
~ rt ~ ~ ~ ~ - fl ~ - : A i ~
~ ? . l
G ~ti ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ - ' ~ ~
0 '`,`,~o~ ~ ~ ~1~~~. ~ ~
~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ . ' ~ . ~ I :~:1 ~ . I
~ ' • ~ ~ ; ~ ' ~ . ~ - ~
7
, l, 4 , Is
41{,,~%
. .
41
i ~ ~ • `,y.\~ ~a ~.r /f _ ~
f / '
i . . . . ` q . _ . f
I . . . . . . , ~S .a . . .
~ S ~ F ~ - f ~ki~ ~~~i ' dc- ' ~ I~~4~ I ~ ; ! ' ~ i E ~ ~
1OQHDS NIViNnoA ]IdA
.yiilj
!
!
1
~ . , _
~ `fi',r7
y I~1 . 1 .
1
~
~T,~
. . ~1 ~ , - ~ -:d" f` ~ . I . a ~f
; ~ I ~a f~. )J t - °I .
~kI~
~
:
klpog
. ~ . . . ~ .
4
;I
y V
-13
dg~ 1 ~ zx /
` . ' - - . i I/~ ~ 1 . E1~' 3d; , ~ ..sa ~f •1 y$rs~ I,.
' a~ . . .
f-
f
~
~~n , ~ / ;
: 0 L 3-M, ~31.M
~
- !ti jlll + 'il'I -
~H . 100HOS N!'dlNflOW 11VA
. ~ . :
_..i
G
~
r '~I L
~
_ . . ~ l . , . ~
I
3F
Ii
. 3a ,'r ~ . 1j1
1 a'
~ , .
WS
~ . , ~ . . , R~ I~ ' . •~I F Iy I I ~ ~ ~ rt ,
y I 9
-:I
~,~~t y ~ ~n • .
r y 1
• ~ ~ ,
~.i' J -
. , .
. . ~
. .
, .
~ ~ _ ' - _ - ^ ~ • ~ ~
. i . ~
. - .
. ~ . ,
i I , ~ s ~ I i fI~
IdCHDS Nlb'INf1QW ]I'df1
~r~r ~ti ~ fj~ •I i~!~ j ~ ~ ~
NYIaa3tsvrv
i . . ~ 't _ ~ ~ : t . s ,
. > • ~ E ' Y I ~ +
, j y ~ • , ~
.
TT tr
: ~ ` ~ j ~ • ~ " ~ ~ I ~ I
l^ $
6 ~ ' i ~ , -r ' - ~
.
. ,
Ii r'!"
, ~ -•-~----*--~-i..
~ `M1 i, j y . - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ i
gi
~ i k ~ ~
.
. f E
, • ~ ~ , C ; ' I
i
~ j -
6
I . ] . _ .
; _ , ~ ~
,
,
~ ~ ,
, . .
,
1OOHOS NKh~AM 11VA
i°iii Na'ld 831SHl4
I .
. ,
,
~ .
, ~ .
1
,
.
,•L' ~ 1! ~ li'ji Y , ~I . .
} f _ jJ s: t..:~ ~ I
1 . ,
~ 1 I~ .i+~ 7 ' , . ~?~y ~ .K v . ~ { . _ -
~ ` ~)4 ~ . . , . , 1' , .
~ ;t`,'~~ ' "~'i' ~ \ ~ • .
I T.
~
. l.
~ ~ . . . . . , ,
~ ' ? ~ ~ f ~ ~ 1 ZW~ ~ ~ `I ,
~k.~
~I,:
~
,
.
i A
- ~ , . .
OP+~~OTEA
~ . s
IOOHOS NiV1NV llVA #A
I 3 a~ I / : il
~ v # ~ ~II I I i'
fVb'ld a31sdtN
~
~I
• -rtr ~j 9y
~6C~
I 0I
u~~
~ ~3 ; ~ ~,l~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~v~ °-----'~~i„}a r- "~'y-y~' J ~'k ~ ~ ' t "~'y +~~5~. .7-
t--,-~°_------ i
r
'f;yr'~~ _
+ ~ 1•.~ •t j . f ~ ~ t / ~ ; i,~~~,_ 3 , ~ ~ j i -
q 'iy1
~A r7G,~~ o I
~ ' 4 t ~ ~t '~a-y ~ I~I i ~ ~
N~
C~
~
f ~ I i+
i ~ ,'C yJJ 4 ~ ~.4;~
\ J ~ [y~-~}
~ ( .
!
~-f-
I~
- _ 1 - -
.
.
= ' I
- - -
_~r.-----
- _ - - -
y
c i - - - - 1 yy~ Ji lR2A
,
Ia0HO5Nlb'11Vf10W11VA
NYld ~131Sb`W
-r- I ~
s3
t ~ ji ' ~5 x Z~m~ ~ i~ • ~ ~ ~ e~~ a! ,
I f - ~ 3 r
ly,'
9 P I P 4.
I ~ ! ~ I
~ IJ i
I r i_ f
1 ~
j - •,j . j.
~J~i
~1
r , . 1 Y ~ 1 +C ~ ~
,
- ' ~ " ~ ~ '•~y ~'Y"~}'~~! V f~2S'~ ; ; ~ .
~
~ • . . ~ ~ u;-
I
~
1 I~~114 a
d
~
~ w
Ar
~ cs
~
• I
a
100HO5 NIVINnaW 11VA
NVId a31SbW
~
~
~ 53 W. zp I
I . ~r R~ { 1 . ~ O
3~ ~ d t~ I ~ ~aci
! , ~'>`x Y,~~ / • ~r ~ ~ I ~ ~ I
iv,
1 . 1 . h(~ ~4 a ~ / ~ I £i f 1. I I
71 ? I: ~ ` • i r ~ ~
4f I
~ •,v^'~t , ! t' ~ ~ ° «t ~ : ` ~ ; j r l~ t~. ~ I ~ ~•~s 4~ ~ ~
~^~t` • ~ • ,l• ~ r ~ .s, ~ ,
g4~
i I 1 <j ~
f If ~~r ,1 G
14
. .
~
-{-3'~I----
~
. .3 _ . '
~
~ 4k`:,~
~
I ~ tya { i i
. I
l . Y~
s1'~ ~
Z r 7 3
4 .i ) ~ f i , j' Y I
E
~y'~ ~ j 0 . i
' \ a.M 1 _~S . ~ ~
Ka !
. . R'' ~ ~
~ i
,
~
i ~ . ~ ' ~ ~ ~
I ~~~"~'~r ~t--~"'r ~ ~ ~
• ~ x r ~ . rL t, ~ ~ : :
,
~
I
- i
. ~
~
~ - -
1~ 1' Y I 0 I~ i
1OOHDSNIb'1NflOW ll%
(II
9 i ~ `I I I I ,
NYId 831M
• ~ ~
~g1 2a ~
~
Tt s ~ ~a L
. ,
a
^ U1 _ ~
~
~
'
~ .e nat- ~ I
i
`7T '5,
,
-~A-
~ / ~ M1 4r
i ~
~
'i
I
~
. y_
~ ~ -
.
I
100HDS NfdiNfl
owlidn
f'• ~•a~ ` ~ ~ • ,;~o : ~
j j z!
4'dlda]1SM
tl Y ~ ~ ~ ~
y ~ `2 ; rR I
3G SK a E ~ ~
`
~ Yiia' $k I i
~ ~I R if 3r
ao~; ~r ~ ~ i~ - ~ I
t
i
t~ ~
,
ET
I ~
I
~I
~ i
fp
I
1
I
I~
i~
Is
IdOHOS NIVINnQW ~ivA C,4 1
- -
~
7 ~
~ 'Ia g f I
I
i
I~
II
. ~i
I'
I f
I
! I I
i - - - - - ~ I
I ~ *
~ ~ •1 j
9
s ~ ~`.,L.-l} ~ •II I
~
S b ~ ~ ~ S g~~+ y
C~ ~ ~ d sl
h ~
f
i
i
~
k
s ~
- i ,
Weul*'IRA
i; ` N
IOoHDs NiViNnaN ifdr~
Nn 831svw
~f~I ~ A~ , I . r ~ D -...1 ? ~+T -a-~~ _ I IJ~ ~ ~S~~ ~
~R V17 . . . 1 . -i I
I
jll~
i
!
I ~ pi ! K a ~ ' '
I - - - k i ~
I ~
i,
~
19
3 2i I ' I I i
.
I , i
,
f
P
• , P
I }I ~ ' ~ ~ j i j I
;
~
i~
. _ _
- .
i
i
i
E !
k -
~
I
100HOS Nlb'iNAOW IN
Nrid~31SNW
-
u ~
r
,r$
~ ~ _ ~ - - - . . ~ i
'6 4 - - . ~
g I
~ € _ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~
ii
' I
Q~ ~ / - ~ { _ I
I
;
~
~
' Ds
T o r ` ~
~ P
~
~
~ E
LI r. ~
1 i
~rr r• y , F i
j~~1 - ' ! • `
i. . ~ ~
. E
'
" - !
. , i
~ • . : 4p I
~
:
:
_ _._....p. _ - _ ~
, ,
IOOHOS NIViNnoW iivA
Wda31SVW j~~ ~
1~..
~
E
~
RR ~
I a I ~ • ~ ~l i
w
m
~
;
f y
~
~
I ~ I
i i
I
~ i
~ i P
i q ~ I i
I 9
1 I ~ ~
~
I ~
I
- - ~
i
- i
- - - - .
~
m t i +fil 100HOS Nf'd1NOOW ll! t~11
NVua3sM 4~~
r~-
~
+
r
f t `~ti~~J
jI~
3 6 I
~ 7 I~~ R ~
1J. ~
}1 -r ~ ~ 1
~
;
--I ~
~I ~ r ? ~ (~f ~ j ~
~ I y -L~~ Fy O
J
~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ y , , ~ ? ; i ~
i
-
77
. ~ 1 f
_ - ,
i,~-.---.-
~ IoaHOs NibiNnah iivn C%l
} `I R 3
M+"fd a31$VYV ~ Y~1~3I o
~ -
~¢ks
~ - i
C] ' dG ~4 ~
~ ~ ~ t• ~ ~ .;I _ " ' ' ~
I '
I I I ~ ~ ~
I ! ~ I I
,
~ ^ i ~ I
~ ~I i
€
I y
i ~ t ~ a t
Ya
9
f ~ s
IL
9 ~
~
~
- ~
I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i
, ' o I
- ;
! ~ ¦ I I7
IF
]
i
IQOHDS Nlb`1N114W 11HA
` Dp-~,~"Yf1d a315~'W
I
Fl-
~ Y )
~ g a ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' * .~tl
$ 1 y ~
W ,yj A A s
I ~ !
I I ~ wt---Jo ~ . - i
~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ I
w k ~ y ~
. ~
I I ~ i~ 3L ~
~ ; ~ - _ -___.s---__-_
- _a
i .
~
li
Ii
It
~04~IOS ~Il'd1Nf14Ui`lldll
~ ~ _ 1 5}
- ~ ';l~; -
.
: - - ~
- ~
- ~ i
i
.~TrK s's
4 b ~I,-=% ~ .]S t m ~
i ? ~ I i
~
y
-
Y
e
I ~
x ,
~ , . x
~
i
j xl
~ - ri - , ~ I
00p, IOLI~ IOS 111 Y11lA1/1 Y]I YI l r~nd a3isvw
- ~ - - .
I~
s
~-IF 7. ~I
gF ,r___
~ T 4x 4 ~I ~I ~ !
I
~
-
- ; - ' i
,.-r~~ ~
I 4 '
1 y` ~ T~ I ~f P I
I ~
i
~ - ~ ~
I ~I I
~ . ~ ~ .
si ~ ~I ~ I V
a I I ~ ~gp
b ; .
71
rr I~I. ' ~ :ii. I~~~~ ~ ` O
IoaHOs NidAnow IiVA
NHId O1.SbW
~
, I
' - ° ov m o
I Y~ I I .i I I. 4.~. ~
Er4
- I
-R~15
---l-
'
~ i
I r e ~
.
. ~
! I
I
t ~
~
; i
I
~
I~~}~• 3 ~ I I ^
row Reh cQ*7.
IOQHOS NlV1Nf10W 11'dll '
Nr7d aMvw
- - - - - _ . - _
- - - - - - 1
~ - -
y
I, ~I f/ ~ r I I
i ~ ~ ' w ' ~ I ` t ~ ~ ~i4 ~ a - ~ ' ~ i i
~
k ~ ~ ~ d' I~ ' ~ ~ I ~ I t' ' ~ L•1 i _ ~ i ~ ~ I
I4~ I~` ~?f E
I'
~ 'u` ~ ~ q~ T" I ~ : ' _ i
9 a ~ ~ S: 1
'
I I W I ~
i /
, _ _ ~ ~ , ~ • f ~ ~ "il ~ t1
' I
, ~ _ _ _ ~
-
,
r ,y
,
. .
.
,
.
i sj a~
r...k I ~ h E
p~ m
--~e-""~"
~f
;
i
1GOHOS NIV1NilOW 1IVA
_ _ _ _
u
I ~
~
i
_ i
I ~3 4 f
I g I
~
i ~
~ i. 177T
~
,
.
,
~
~
.
1 /
1 ~
~ LtP dF I
J 8
.
! T ~
r' x
i ~
I ~
t
`
~
i - ~
. 1
.
! - ~ [ ~ i
,
i <<
- - - ~ - _ „
IOQHOS NI'd1NnOW 11V11
.~~alvra'~,r'~ , ~f
I r J I:j~~J~ il a f s~
~ ti~'~ ~
ry ,
~ ~ 'F • ,
_ r
~r ~ l r~ a~ y 3.
4 _ i
l~tY ~J ra3 'xf
' S' 1 tA"~(L e:~
}
f .F sv r 7a ~ F i ~ i d'Yxyk >
~l~~~+lJ
~
I R/i~ r ~..fsp~.F i:fxA~~^I}~~
i N W~ia ~ ~ ~ ~~ce~n: ~ . ~ as i9~~ ~ , ~ .~i~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~.,,~ti ; ~ ~
P"L.
i J *?r ~~j ~+~"~f~~ f a s d . r~~ ~ I ~ ,ti ~~'~`'M~'•',~cu;,`-~`z~~,. ~}l~'[ . ~I ~'i^~~~~ ~f .
4 ~
~ ~d~~1 g ; ~ ,r s M # dt
r Y 4 "',,7 '~f ~ ~x,',i;P
S-
£t f3 rrt
A~~~~"
y"k~ ~r,y
a! t v
'I _ ~ Y~'~~ ~r,~~~T`~~ ~ ; ~ ~ ' ~ ~ E~ ~ zs~~ ~ f+~•
......~Yl~~ M
~d;, v,
,d.. ,~vd• ~'"~t ~ ~ nds' ~ s'~ ` r , ~ ~ . r . i~+,il ; R ~ ~
§
I ~~~,t ~ ~ ~r p t ' ~~A? _ , ~ ~~i ' a~
~ t
~ t
1I
~ ~ ~ v`~ ~~~~Y ~aa~l~a~~~'`.? A~ Y
~ r k,,.. ~ ~ •~t° i f f f ~e~ - . e . ~ rr i:
~ ~~`k °1?'
"
lor
, uFax~~ ~p.~g, ~
T-l
~~v~y
;-"x4~
w1iP-~;:'~~,
! ~IT.
it" "Tn~~~
r ~
~ i
k. ~aa * I a
1.- ~ - r7' r~. .a f 5
x, ZF 'a t
~hvn
~,p,,,~~
:
it4.
,
,
W , s
~
~
.
I _ _d
~ 9; 3 I~~ I WvIo71Pn
100f1+1t7 NIVJ.IVI IOYY IIVl4
A~
3-~~~t
"
o.l
rrf y R f i~ i{", 'yu 7i'~ ~iaF~
~~'7~G I ~
. 7.
~_u ~
t
>
~ r r/{ &19 A .-M ! ~j~, t 4i" r t: Y ri F I} X
o. ~ ?"r?~%f.~ x d v X aS < p ~ . ~ ~a-e,~ : ~r~ A~*~`4 ~ ea s . , t ~ 4 z E ~
1 r r :f~fll~r~.~''i
1 ~
i
~ i ,k~~tlb~~~~~ '"r;•r~ ~ S A~ . g y A4 4- 571 :
i
f s~~ll ~•,~~I~'~~~.,` y~~ w~ a9 ~liC~'k I~4~rr ~,M ~ i~~~~ 9
i
w5 ~e
A C
xj 3~
C,
60
~ .~a~•`~~?i ~q %s ~ a~ f r ~ ~ A ~ ~1~, ~ " 1-' a 4
3 ~ v •-r 1d,1~:~,^ tdtr ~1 ~~~;,.i,~~~` gg-'
qt~6~
~ 3?~~r+"`~.'r ~ ~M d~~~~ s 3~T~-._~ti _ ~ 'f~ _a ~s! ~
~~t'~ ~~5,~ ~ ?':.%r~ •a~-~-, 4k,~'fsF~.~#";~
P 3 ~
~
y
".r~"
`°`T"-"`~~
' ~J a 1 ~e ~ 4 ~ '~.4 ~ ~ ;K i~, ~ ! k { ~ ~
P~
AkM~I.~
~ P ~ •i s~-9j~f..s,y, x° m i2 e~ ~ } I~ a9
i ~ a { ~x r-,7~-?~ y ~ ~aG° ~r-~ ~ `~NjP° ~ .+:#4 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~i. VE.~ ' ~'~i ~`r
~p
k
'~i
'~.~f -
~p
}y~,._ t ~1c ~y ~.k . ~ _ r ~ 7
a-
3 I
!
~
5'~
if;> ~ ~ ~ ~~d' . 1`~aa7~ . ,,y$ ~ 5 r ~ ° 5' ~ ~ j. I t 3 . E ; I . ui ; .e +3~ ;~•ss ~ ~.a t. .c„ _`r ~ - L , : I
~c
ZPt~~
nz ~s ~ fi 7
.~W
~.~.b'~
k l ,.e
~~t~; ~ r ~ ~ r wf~' ~ ~ ~ sa y r .
"A % ~ ~i`"~r.~ , ~w ? 'c°4 'R` ,R
•t,.~` r ~..r c.~~~~~ ~ s„:~. k s~~ ~ K~ I ~ R ~ I ~ - ~~*'"~~Y='
.
s a,°.,
! E I ~ ' I
I00HD5 NIdiNnaw
Dld 83ISM
~ F
~ I
I
' I
~
~
~,I I
i~
I
~
~
~ I ~
i
~ ~ -
~
~
~
,
~
r 'r
-
~
~
~ `7E J
r ~6 ~ z ~r~ J ~ . .Ij~ .
i
W Re ~ - _ ~ ~ ~x
I ~ I 4
~
:r
~ . - : . .
~ t~ • ~ Y.~~J _
ro~a ~ ~S~V
I
'
I
cqa i
IOOHOS NIVINnonlibA . ~ }
p
NV1d d33'61
_
' / ! / / f ! ! ? I / / ~ ~ _ 1 _ ~ ' ~ ~15 t ! 3 ' x f ~ ~ U
a / /!1! r ~ I ~ 1 1 ! Y~ ~ j r 1; ~1
i ~ ~ ? ~i/ . ~ r / 1 ~7 1 I ~~J ~.J~`,~1..
~ , ~ , ; ~ ~ i ,f r i ! ~ r! ~'~S rY ~ ,F ~ ' f I ~ ~
i~•~i.fii~~ii~`~Il~ ~S! ~1, I 1 I,,~r~ i
f~i ~ ~ i i i ~ I ~ ~ .s~:; ~ ~~•~_i ~
; r f/ i i ~ s i 7;' J f r ~ I} ~ ~
, • f ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 6 ` r ti ~ ~ j1, , ~rI/ ~ j ~
0 ~ r s r ~ i " f~iJ,'~:% • f ~ ~ ~'.E , l, ~1' I ~ / ~ , ~ '
~ ~ i I ,f'~ iN'`~{ / ~f / / ~ ~ 7,'.~°k-•-. ~ V 1 ' ~~`~i. ~ ~ `i t - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ti ~ ~
I ~
1 ~ I ~r I 1 ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • / ~ ~ ~~Y ~ ` + c~ ~ , ~ f ~ ' ~ i M
f` i ~ ~ i i jf ! .ti ' ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~1~
~
= - - - - ~'~,~~~:J•~ i ~0--~
t ~141. a iI
~ - 7-~iti• ~ ~j~ / i ~ ~ i` / ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ r i I ~ ~ ~
,-,ti•~Y`.~~.,u,'~ r.'~'~``~f - ,i~~ ~ i, r . l-"''' ~ y' g. I 1 ~ ~ r i I
, 4~ ~ , , i ; ~ ~ ~ , • f ~ i; ~ ~ i
K:,,-.. . i~ /r , j_ e rs1\~~?~ ~'c-~' .p,/ ~ ~rY~ ~ ~
N
~ ~ , ~ ` ~1 ~ f~"\ ~ ~ I~i ~ i ~ ' ,
rr'°~:1 ? q 1`Y ; ~ . . ~ t~ : , \ ~ ~ , ~p ( ~ .
' f ~ a ~ ~ ? ~ ~f~ ~ iy~i j
I p• i ~-~,~~4` ~ ~ e f ~ l~ , f a ~ i ~ E
tr
~
,-S~j ~ I • 1\~ fi r1 ~r ~
~ I~i~~ ',E ~-c, i . ~ f~~ G'• ~1 ~i.L~M -
Y
. i ~3' f~~ ~ l ~ 1 . \ . s+/ . i i i~~ ~
t ~;~y ,e j ' { ~ il ~ l~yi i~' ~
1`,•~~~ c- °%e ~ ~ f ' a ~ i~
~ ` . , -Y ! ' ~=.C,~` ~r~ -t~'` .._I . L_ .'~1 , ~ . . ~1i ~ . j i ~ I i !9
. _ ,
OWq Fn
IOoHOs NivlNnaw iivn
10 r~~ ~31svw I I I I
.l
d
~
T~ :
~
J ~ ~ ~ ~ Gs s s u ~ y p, .
.
i
~ ~W k 4
g ~ i 7
y . _ !
I~6 !i
! } _ ii a~=
R3ge5 ~
m a° ~a9i ~ > S~ $i~iE
V3~ i 7?ls
? - d ' z I
I -'E~il~
11I
ajel t+pis , t s3
o=
l,,,i ~,F~Ek
5!d i
~ril
f,
J1
_
7F~'
iike
~ I •
Cf1
~
,
.
. i "A ~ I
i
. . i
S~v ~ I~ A aL y L~ S ~~~7: ~ IItI AIF ~ • ^~Cl~
ii~ 3 ' ~u•~
; j I ~
~ lb~i rt ~ 3f 4 3 BIBI1~41 ..~~i • ~ . ~r °~4 . q„~ ~
gp 3 51 , S~~F l~ rI eI~ ~ j~:'I .i P~` `•1---j:
A _
~ Attachment B
Infarmation From Applicant
~
~
32
B,~~~~BRAUN ASSOCiiAIFES, IiNC.
F'LANNIIVG and COMMl1N1TY DE`JELCSPMENT
August b, 2002
Planning and Environrnental Cammission
And
Russell F"orrest; AICP
Director of Community Development
Tawn of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: August 22 heazing for Vail Mountain SchooI Praject, Vail, Colorado
Dear Planning Cammission Members: ~
Thank yau again for your insightfiul comments on the Vail Mountain School project. We
appreciated the opportunity ta review with you aur progress on the project at your ]a.st meeting.
We are requesting a fnal review of the project at the August 12 hearing and believe that we have
addressed all of the issues raised by the PEC and the neighbars.
The revised plans that have been submitted address the specific cvmmen4s raised at the July 22
hearing. Below is a list of the comments and how we have addressed them:
• Rotate or pivot the soccer field to provide increased separation of the narthwest carner of
tk~e field to Baothfalls Road.
o The plans were revised to provide this separation and provide a landscape berrn
betrveen the soccer field and Boot,hfalls Road.
0 Move the bus stQp to the west side af the bus stop loop.
o The bus stop has been relacated to the west side of the bus stop loop.
• Provide a direct pedestrian connection fram the bus stop to the school and provide a
raised crosswalk within the parking area. ~
o A direct pedestrian cflruaection and raised crosswalk have been prauided. ~
~
Eciwards Village Center, Suite G204 Ph. - 970325.7575
0105 Edwards Village Boulevard Fax - 970.926J576
Past Office Box 2058 www.braunassoeiates.corn
Edwards, Colorado 8 1632
.
~ * Provide a painted crosswalk at the entrance ora Boothfalls Road to ailow pedestrians the
ability to crass.
o A Crosswalk has been provided in additian to sidewalk connections to the bus stop
area.
• Provide apaved path from the cabin area ta the schvol.
o A paved path has been provided.
• Add a statement in the garking management plan that the school will pursue an
agreernent with the Towm of Vail to utilize the Boothfalls trailhead parking area for
overflow parking during special events.
o This langua;e has been added to the 5pecial Event Parking Management Plan
(attached).
We believe that vve have acldressed your finad camrnents on the project and hope that yau will
approvelrecammend apgraval of a11 of our applications.
Thank yau again for your help on this project,
in el
~ Domi~i F. MaurnielTv, AIGP
~
I 2
~
~
Vall mountain 5chOOl
5pe,eal Evel't
C~?n
park?ng Manac3cmcnt
i
.
~ t,~ r •
A,u63u5t 8, 2002
~
Vail Mountain 5chool
Special Event Parking Management Plan
August 12, 2002
I. Purposc
The purpose of this, Speci~al Event Parking Manarement Plan (here after,
"Plan 15 to regulate how parkincj is cQntrolled durincj special event5 at the
Vail Mountain 5chool {`,/MS} campus. The schaol w+11 utilize thi5 Plan when
pSanning 5pecia[ everits. ar when working with community g170up5 desiring ta
use the schoal's facilities. Thi5 Plan is intended to be a quide. Additional
parkmg 5alution5 may be developed by the schvol working in cQncert with the
Town of VaiE,
II. Special Events
The proposed 5chool facilltIes have been desiped ta addre55 the typicaf
~ programmatac needs of the Vail Mountain Schaol. The parkmL3 provided an
the 51te will meet the day-to-day needs of the 5ehoo{. AdditionaCly, the I PG
parktnc~ 5paGe5 provided on-5ite exceed the Town's parking requirement for a
400-5eat auditorium. The Town's park.inr3 recluirement of f parkang per 120
51. ft. of seating floor area generates a need for 30 parkincj 5pace5 (3,500
5cl, ft. seating area), Elowever, VM5 under5tands, that certain rare events
may exceed the Town's parking calculatbon and the number of 5tandard spaces
provided on-site.
V'MS wi(I from time-to-time have event5 in the auditarium or within the athletic
facilitaes that may generate parking demand beyond the normal capacity of the
des]gnated parkinq areas. In these rare circumstances alternative parkincj
scenarios and mode5 of transportation will need to be utiiized.
VMS, on aCa5e-by-c01se ba5is, may allow other community groups to utilize its
fac1E1t1e5. These community events may recluire sPecial provasions for parkeng
depending on the number of par-ticipants and the type of event planned.
III. Parking Alternative5
Durirrg special events VM5 may employ (or require of ather5 utilizing the
schoal facilities) the f0l9owir,g parkinr~ rnanagement technique5 in order to
~ reduce parlcing impacts to the neicjhbarhaod anci the Town's 5treet network.
One or a combinatition of the fallowting techn3que5 may 4ae utilized. A parkinc3
plan 75 attached to th7s plan.
2
~
L
.
~
•ffncourac~e users to utilize the Town af Vail bus system. The Town's
bu5 stop is located an the property and 15 prox~mate to the 5chool'5
facslrtIes. VMS wlli use nottices, letters, or fiyers to indicate that the
Touvn'S bu5 5y5tem 15 auallable and encourage partGcipants to take the
bu5 to and from thC campus.
* Requir~e/encourage the use of private 5huttle5 to deltver users to the
property frnm other remote public parkincj areas. These public parking
area5 may include the CDOT parkEncj area focated at the east Vatl
interchange, Baoth Fafls Traiaheacl parking area, Ford Park parking
areas, the Vaii ViIlage parking Structure, and the Lianshead Parking
structure. Any use of the Town's parking facilities well recjvire
caordfnation wlth the Touvn of Vadl.
• Employ the service5 of a parking valet to u5e the on-site parking areas
as effrciently as possible. Vl/ith valet servtice approximately 20
additional cars that can lae accommQdated within the desugnated
parking areas.
•Encourage carpooling by users and participants_ The school wiil notify ~
guest and u5er5 that paricing is limited on the property for special
events and will encourage them to ride together.
~ The VaFI ivlountain SchoQl will pursue an acjreement with the Town to
allow averflow parkang during 5pe-Cial events on the 8aothfalls Trail
11ead parkmg area in exchange fQr the u5e af VMS parking far the
Town'5 overflaw in the summec months.
IV. Parkjng Re5triction5
Parksn9 an Boot'h Falls RQad, Katsos Ranch Road, anci the North F:rontage
Raad will not be endorsed or encouraged by VNiS. VM5, through not+ce5 to
parents, participants, anci u5er5, 5hall indticate that parkmg ss proinibited on
Booth Fal6s Raad, Kat505 Ranch Road, and the Ncrth Frontage Raad. VMS
will work with the Town of Vai{ and code enforeement ta en5ure that U5er5 of
the 5chooi faciiities do nat park on these neEghborhood 5treets.
~
3
AUG-01-02 THV 13:23 F0X H!GGINS GROUF FAX N0, 3037722329 P,01
.
~ FOX
T Ft ,4 N S P O F2 7 A T I 0 tV G R? W P
MEMO?RANpUM
Date. nU9u5C I, 2V02 iD1048ParkingA,Sejru;.wNd
To: Dominic Mauriello
Braun Assoceates, In~, (via FAX: 974.925.7576)
From: Jo Ann Niggin
Subject: Vaal Mountain School Project - Parking and Access
Since cornpletion of the traffEC impact study (1f15) dated May'9, 2002 for the Vail lvkountain
Schoal Pcorer.t, the proposed school parking canfiguration has been revised, The TIS wvas
based oii a totaJ of 115 parking spaces on the site wiih 80 parking spaces 6n the main school
~ iat aceess from Baoth FalIs Road ar,c[ 35 spaces in the facufiy hausing lot access from Katsas
Ranch Road. The current pFan identifies a totaf of 120 par{cing spaces with 92 spaces in the
main school lot (Booti-r Fa{ls Raad access), 12 spaces in the northem lot (Boath Falls Road
nortli access), and 16 spaces in the r'acuity izousing lot (Katsos Ranch Road access).
The parking supply on the school campus wiil sufficiently s+erve thE average day to day school
operatFans. These aperatians currentEy include school piays, perfQrniances, meetings, and
athfetic events. The revised parking configuration will resuft in slight diversions in #raffic (15-
20 vehicles) from the Katsos Ranch Road ta tlie Booth Falls Road intersection a9ong the
Froiitage Road. This traffic diversion does r,ot warrant the need far auxiliary ianes a1oiig the
Frontage fioad since the percent increase in traffic over existing volumes wilf remaira at less
lIIC7n ?0%.
A.s riated in the 715, alternatives to reduce parking demands should be cpnsidered if an ewent
oecurs on the site or at the auditariuni thai creates a parkingdemand in excess of the proUosed
120 5pr1Ce5, A parking management plan has been established by the school that adeiresses
parking demand5 and meihods for eantaining these veIZecies on site far Iarge Qvents. The
parking alternat4ves incWe sh uttle service during Iargeevents, valet parkrng assistance where
vehicles are stacked on the site, or identifying overflaw parlcing areas sueh as remate parking
areas. Becaiase less than 10 event5 per year are planned at the auditarium, on-site parking
should be adequate in rnost cases. There are aciequate areas (remote and valet parking, etc)
that alfaw faropportunities ta contain excess parking demands within the site baundaries. Tfais
0 concltades our supplemental review af the current parking and access plan for the Vail
Mounta;n School site,
,
P.O. Bax l 976E3, E'3ouLDER, C[7LORAD? 20308-2768
Pr-ioavE. 303-652-3571 • FAx: 303-552-0574.
na/ nrizeaz 19:):b5 ~f~~7Lb~f~lb t4KHuV Hz)7UV1HItz3 rHk3G ri 1 I
i
¦ BA1/BRAUN ASSOGIATES. INC, - - ~
P.rwrvuNc armd CaMMuNm DEVacPMEW
FAX TRA"SM1SSION
70.. gi
f l;A 7R': / _ ~ ~ s
f ir ~
FROMs a..f[J+~ •
aAr&
RE: \[OAS
pA.i"'iiESs
(indudes this +cawet shoot) ~
COMMENTS:
~
D tc ~Cr~ ~er R~~~~d : ,?4~ (.~K ~ `
~
~
Please caI[ if yra+u have viot reaalved ali pages er have any problenu with thls tsans;misfion.
Edvvards Village Cer*er, Suite C-209 Ph - 97Q9261575 ~
0105 Edww~Viltage 6oukvard Fax - 470.926.7576
pant Oaca aox 2658 +w+uu+braunassociatcs.com
Edvrards, Calorado 81632
~
i
~ .J
08/07l2002 05:05 976-926-7576 BRAUN ASSOCIATES PAGE 02
~ 08107J2M 17:02 3038932204 ICCJ'D P+4GE 94
ALIG, 7. 2002 4; 12PM CIVI7RS N0. 939 P.2/2
PUW~ELEnON a SIZE
. ' pECiDIlOt1S'aRER -
~ ALNvS TENUIF04fA iHlN-l.EAF ALDO 25 M' B&
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANiCA LANCEOLATA ~~~EN ASH 10 3" CAl,4
PDPULUS AN4USTIF4LIA NARRQW4EAF COTfiON1NOOD Z5 2" CAi..
~OPUWS TR~NNLqIRES _ OUAKING ASP~N 2" 'CAL.
CDNIFROlIBTfM
i ABIES LRSIOQARPA SUBA1.PlNE FIR 50 6-10'
PICEA PU{VGENS CDLORADO SPRUCE 125 B~jd'
P[NUS ARiSTATR BRIST~FC4NE PII~ 25 &10'
PINt1S PON~EROSA PONDEPOSA PiNE 5~~ ~•1~'
DEC1pUDUS SHRUBS
ARTEMaSIA FlLIFOLfA SAND SAGEBRUSH 160 5Q
AMELANCHIER ALNIFOI.fA . SERVIGEBERRY 160 6' B&S
CARAQANA ABORESCENS SISERIAN PEASHRUS 160 5G
coRNUS SroLONIF:Ra RFD osIER voQwOaP 50 5G
CoroNEa5TER ACUTIFOLJA REKiNG CoroNEASrER 50 ba
~ JAMESlA AMERIGANA MOUVTA(N MQGKQRANQE 100 5G CONICERA INVOLUCRATA IBEAR~FRRY HONEYSUCKLE 60 5G MAHOMA REPEN5 GRE~P[NG GARPE HO1,Y • 100 5Q
AIgES A€.PINUM 4PlNF Cl1RRANT 164 5C
RIBES AUREE1M • YGLLovu FILoWERlNG CURRANT i6o bG
SYRINGA UULQARIS CaMMaN LILAc 50 50
vIBuRNuM OPULUs c'uROpEAN cRANBERRY~~SH 50 bG
CMIIFEROl~~SHRUBS
CERCOCARPUS ILEp(FflLIUS CURl.-l,ERF. MDUNTAfN MAHOCANY 50 5Q JUIVIPERUS HD~~~ONTA1.19 'BLUE CHIP' 13tUI~ CHIp JUNIAFR 100 a~
JUNIPERUS sASINA 'BUFFAGO' BUFFALd .1UNIPIEA 1po sq
JUNIPERUS SABfNA TAMAR1SGfFpLIa TAMARrX JUhlIPER 100 5G
OROUNDM1ERVERhNM ' .
~QUllEGIA CoLuMBINE 400 IG
ASTER A1.P9htUS PURPL.L ASTEi4 475 1G
OHRYSANTHEUM MAXIMUM SHASTA qAISY 450 1G
COREOPSIS GRADIFLORA COREOPSIS 475 1G
' ECH{NACEA PURPUREA ' PuAPI.E Ca1NEFLflWUER 4{}0 ,Q
GAILI.ARD{A X GRANDIFLORA BI.ANKE7 ~~OWFR 300 10,
~ LAVANDtJ0 ANGUSTIFaIIA ENGCIsH I.AVEfYDER • 200 1Q
L1MONluM LATIFOLIUM SEA LAVFNpER 400 iG
SEDuM Aut~MN JoY 400 1Q
OBf07/2902 05:05 970-926°7576 BRAUN ASSOCIATES PAGE 03
. *
0187/2002 17:62 3038932294 KCJL PAGE 02
9ACSIM ~.T 5 T.AL ~
DATE: Augcist 2402 NLTNiBER UF FA,GES:
i
(ENCLUDI7,VG COVER)
Ta: Kyle schraca~
BIKAUDIN
Com[rANy: xsipp colussyxenks Dubcis GANz~
COMMTUC
FAX NuMBEM 303-893-2204 W994MM
aae.a onM
,otaDOn..rvrwtvrk
FRQM: ''i8 NOT(~ w
a"Wmti m n+ui
[am tri1a~21
e+. PmmaNCs
STJB.TECT: Lighting St2aaar3aCds
pR4JECT NUM8ER: 7511.01
NNS3AGE:
Ttuc exterior lighting design fox ttie Vail, Moutttaun Sr,hool meets the Town of Vail Develvpment
Sundm-ds as fvllvws.
1. Height Limtts - Type Sl fxMm ie mcnmtcd to a 8' pole wltich is the maximum hei& a1lawed ~
for a rCsidentzsl Eone-
2. Light Svurses A,ffixad To Struch= - Type S2 is a wa11 sconce mvunted r;n the wall at a
heip,ht of 10' above fiaished gmund, thus meeting the requiromcnt 'ihat na £xture is mounteci aa
the rvaf.
3. Cutof£ Shields - Type S 1 fixture meeta the cut-aff rtquixement by a lauver #hat sWelds the
lamp attd does not emit li,ght above 60 degrres frnm vertical.
4. Luniiuwnce - For type 53 the rario o£ saurce lumens, 9,000 lumens, to luuaitaous area,100 sq.
in., is 90 rrrhich is loss then the maxirnwn 125.
Calculatiozi S"mznazy
The illumingace Iavc1 the parking lots are dekgned tD are thQSe recoumencled by the
Illumination Bngineering 5ocsety. The avera$e illumzflance Ieve1 far the West and Ea.at Pmking
1ot are 0.4 footcandles aad 0.2 footcanclles, rsspectively.
FLEASM VEWX RE'CM7 zlF ALL PAGES. Ik' ANY AXE Nb[MN'Cs,
PLEAiBE CALL (303) 278-3820 FOR R~'.TRANSMISSii3IK.
eC:
~
[.iPtKrmFeir ~vd SC1fir~~~Lve~l ldMepY17L.~e~Y 6NweatF9nK]L14217Sif915F07'fT~ Y'i~lltllfethMS eo~g11i111c1,daC
08/0712002 05:05 970-926-7576 BRAUN A,aSQCZATES PAGE 64
s
06/67/2602 17:02 3038932304 KCJD PAGE 03
~ WG. 7. ~ i1PNi GIVITAS NO, 939 P.12
~ e
Fax GMT~`i
To: Ktrle 5chraeder Fim Nm ~03.03.2204
alussyJen1~ ~af5
FIu111; esjardins Di'm 7, Q2 >vrbaa ~]0 unUln 5chod cvr KQw aLSAd~4~pe Ateh~ta~
cc p= NQt
Suljoet: Dcamirtic's n9qyest pow; 2
Ad Mna+ft
Flsaoe flnd erydosed a nble of vegeta#on that Qominic mques%d
~
i
I
~
~
0B/e9/2062 02;49 979-926-7576 $RALJN ASSOCIATES PAGE 01
s
BAi/B-R-,l..CN AS5OCIATES, INC. ~
PLANNrNG wd cOMMUNtTY pMOF'M€ht't
FAX '1'RAIrISMISSION
TG: tl'S 'S
FAx z ( (
FROM:
DATE: Z-
RE: ~~~t'~?(/~ ~-r, ~ f~~`~~? ~ ~~°'7'~-r'~
PAGES;
(inclydes this cawar :haet) ~
CQNlMENTf:
pfeate caU If you hwe not feceiutd all pages or have any problems wlkh tbb trarr:rnisxion.
Edyards Vi" Cenltor, Surtt C•203 Fh. - 970.926.7575 ~
0105 EdMards village Ba,tewird Faat - 970.926.7576
Posi f)flice &rX 2658 vvvvw,brainassociateicorn
Ectuvards, Colcrada 8 1632
~ ~
~
08I0912002 02:49 970-926-7576 tSKUUrv HJ~V-INILJ
68J67/2002 77; 02 30389322B4 KC,Jp PAGE 04
W,L. 7. U02 4;IEPM cIVI7A5 Nb.939 ~'-~''c
s
PUW ~ELEC~ON M~ ~IZE
,
' MctpuGUs TRfa
` gI.NUS TENU(FOGfR THIN-l.EAF Ai.QF 25 5-6' h
FRAXehIJS PENNSYLUANICR l,ANCEOIAYA GRtEN ASH 10 3" CAt„
~ PDPU~US ANQUSTIFQI.la NARRUWI-W GOT'f0NWOUp 25 2" CAL,
~~~UWS TREMULDIDES , QUAKiNG RSPEN 385 2" 'CrAL,
VOJyIf R~~S TREES
; ABiES 1,AS1ODARPA SUBW1NE F!R 50 6-10-
PlCEA PUNGENS COLORRDO SPRUCE 125 B•iD'
PENUS ARfSTATA BRIS700NE P* 25 6-101
PiNUS PONDE9,05R PONflEROSA PINE 50 6-10"
DECIOLlOUS SHRUBS
ARTEMISIA F1C.tlF01(A SANR SAQEBRU5H 160 50
AMEtANGHIL-R RLN1FQL(A . SEAVICEOERRY W 6' B&B
' CARRGRNA ABDRcSCENS SIBERiAN ,PEASYiRUS 160 5G
CQRNuS STOLONIFERA RED OSIEA RflQW4OD 50 5G
CO~ONEAS7ER ACllT(FOLIA AEKiNG COTONEASTER 50 6G
jAMES~~ AMERiCANA MOUNTAIN MDCKORANGE ion 5G CONICERA fNVOl.UCRATA BFRR~ERRY FiONEYSUCKLE 50 5Q .
MAHONfg REPENS CRE£FING GRA~E HOLY ` 100 5a
RxBEs ALPiNuM AI.PiNF CURRANr 160 5G
RfBES AURFuM YFLI.OW FWWERING CURRANT 160 6G
' SYRINQA yUI.GARIS COMMON LlLAC 50
V{eURNUM 4PUtUS EUROPEAN CRWLRRYBUSN 50 5G
CUNfFEROB•SHRUBS
CERCOCARP3JS (.EDiFQZIUS CURL-LERF, MOUNTA{N MANO+GANY 50 5G .
4WERUS NORiZONTAl.l9 13LU~ CHfP' $LUE GHlP JUNIP~R 100 5G
JUNIpERUS SABINA 'BUFFALO' BUFFRLd JUhlIPER 100 4
JUNiPERUS SABfNA TANfARlSCI~0I_lA TAMARIX dUNlP~R 100 5G
GROUNDCp1ERStPERINNKS ,
AQUILEGIA COLUMBINE 400 1G
A'STER AGPlNUS PURPf.E ASTER 475 IC
CHRYSRN7HE'.lM MAKlMUM SHASTA RAaSY 450 1G
Cf}REOP0 GRAQ~FI.C1RA CC1REOPS15 475 1G
° ECHINACEA PURPUgEA PURRL~ CDNEFl,O1NER 400 1G
GAll,l.ARD1A K GRANp1FLORA Bl.ANKET F1.DWER ' 300 1G
f.AYANDULA ANGUSTiF!o!,lA ENGLtSH LAVENDER 200 IG
~ l.IMONIUM LATIFOLIUM SEA LRVENRER 400 1G
SEDUJ1 AUTtJMN ,tOY 400 1G
08/091'2602 07:49 970°426-7576 ERA~J:llN ASSOCIATES PACaE 03
08/07/2002 17;62 3E38432264 KCJD PAGE 02 ~
r _ i
LACSTMXrIE ~MEU-&
DA,TE: August 7, 2002 NUMSER MPAGES:
1
(IdYCLXJD~IG CUVER)
'TQ: I~yl~ Schmeder
~~~an+r
B
C:QMPAZ1i'Y: ~;1ipp Calussy Jenks Dubais GANzE
corIMTINc
FA:X Ni3MER: 303-893-2204 romm9moc'
vumm orn=
Mon,"Ww"Mw
FROM: TiaNoxd kft,rs
rco.m,
ma1msnl
rrre M
sr+a~a
SuB3Ee"r: Laghtixtg Stvo.d~rds
PRQa+L"TNU'MER 7511.01
MSSS.A.GE:
'I`hc exterior lighting desip fflx the Vail Mo=tain Sc"iooi meets the To= of Vai1 Developrn=t
Standards as follows.
I. bteigbt Litnits -TYpe Sl fixture is mounted to a B' pale which is the maxumum hazght a11ovved ~
far a 1t'esi:dejatxal zone.
2, Li& Sources A.ffixcd To Stru.u-tums - Type S2 ie a w4I xconm mnunted m the wall as a
Wght af I(Y sbove finish:ed gound, thus mcetin$ the requirement that na #"ixtae zs m$unted an
the rnof
3. Cutoff Shieids -'Z'ype S 1 fixture meets the eut-aff reqturcmmt by a Zouver thm sbields the
lamp and does not ersit light above 64 dcgrees from vertical.
4. Lumi?ance -For type 53 the ratio t?f source Imens, 9,0001umens, tc> ltixninous area, 104 sq.
in., ia 94 wbfcli is lees 'rhan the mximum 125.
Calculatioa Suaaamary
- Ttie zlZumaiaance level the parking 1ots $re desigaed to arc thosr rmaramend.ed by the
I11uminaciQn Bngineering Saciety. The average xliun-Amoe Ieve1 for the West and L, ag Parlcng
1ot are 0.4 £ootcanclle5 and 0.2 £ootcand.les, respecizvely.
M.EASE VE'R7X RRL'JWT OF Ax,L PAGESS. JEF rh,NY AAE MMSING,
TI.EAS'r CAI.L (303) 278-3820 FfJA RE`I,'RANSMSuiOlti.
CC:
~
CW mimau V1 &Wq"v5ik1L9cd 5d0aV7afpmxy S4twwot ncGndf25751141RJ0'{N " rtsEr*qqnp3wnw.doc
08/0912082 82:49 970-926-7576 BRALN pSSOCIA7ES PAGE 04
08/08l2002 15:22 3034496911 W7h,570N ASSOCIA7E5
" PAGE ez
~
~T , .
,
Aucu-t;T 7. 2002
MR. PtTI57R M. AeL)IS' _ hE:ADmAlZTtR BEST COPY
`/AIL r'JaUN"TAl1V _)CI-;OQL
.3460 p\AT~D IZANCH 20AP AVI'ULARLE
vA« CO. $163-7
ptAa 1`1R, ,q$u1,51
THAN!G YC3U F4R YdiJR LE77ER L7F AuGiJST 2002 A)uD THE GENtRAt Ga`1'-tiTMCN7.5
JF Z'f-l~- VAlL M{][riNTAIN -)(',}IOOL "fQ FiEI,P IGAI'C 7T-tE' IMppVGTS Of 'rWEI tXPANNCN RN
~ 7-1-iE KAT-'Q.a RANCH ROAD NEIGFipORH00D;ANV EIGN60FZ5 f~A'JE f~VtLWaa YOUR
LE'TT~t`R A~l~ APPRC[.IAT~ TFiE R~V1SION.~ THL Fd~AS h'IPOE TD i EiE F~ROPCLcp
l?E°++'EI..QPt"~t~T~ Or TRACT
~'HE M1~~1GHP0~ UNI~fR5TAN7 7F{'~ JI~'tGUL K.I~VG -PEci'FIG GU?`1MITM~aV7.5 A7 YFiI~
~fAGE C~P i~-IE PRC},JEGi GIVEN 7HE Ai7G't710 E1w! RtDUIFICD F~Y TH~ '"4Wlv t7P
VAI~, '~'C]kJ~1?L`R, l"H~ N`IG1°;8QR9 AF~ GC7~AD44J"f' 'i'hIR LAGK OF `.JP~GIFiCITY lN
Y~}1J~ LE'TlM G(~~VCEFL~tING TH6 LANp~,Ap1RGHITI!GTIlRE OF RP4jEGY
"rp HE LP Rt-SDLV~ TNIa ntTU/h7lG7N W6 WQ 0 REQiJeST TNAT TFIE NVGHBUP-5 HA'Jt AN
[?PP47RTUN1 i Y 70 RCVlEW '1'He 5PKIpIC p+,.qN FC~R ~'WE LA~~IpSGRPC Ahlp ARGI-t[TEG';"1,1{lE
J~9 TNFY p~YEL(aP~D +4!'~", F~1C3R T~J +H "'j'C1WN3 ZCVIEW. THCS 4JAY THE
NtlGi-d~t)R.~ GaM11 RLfIAIN 11~1 THE PRC3C~5b AN 4w:aO1.VE AitifY t39U~~ PR10€2 TO i}~t
TO'as/N CQ!~PLET1NCa tT9 f'aEV IEW DF T!-It P GT -
TH~- rcEY [--A5UeS F:7R 7We hJl-IG}-{bORHOOD A,5 F0LLOW.5~
i, T~R WQX00IR-5 wAnrr Yo eE MuPX- 'a7 Trte aLz~ Asvu NUrr5M Or r~=-~,
PERCENTAGt aF 'VERGRPCN5, UX @CWM: LANQSCAP6 6OULD~RS WJD
PERkNNIAL PL.ArV7itJG.7 ARE GQN~15T T v0TW THE coI~i"iI'TMEN'r (7r '-m)Upz57AN7IqL
LAND-%-AP IlVG'
~
303.410•92G0 • FA7f 701•4A9•691i • WWyy,yviiu5TONASSOCIA7 S.CDf1 .2jg4 YEANIIL 57REET, SLITE 100 • 80ULdLK, Cp 80302
1
08/09J2002 02:49 970-926-7576 BRAUN ASSQGIATES PpGE 05 '
08I00l2602 15:22 3034496911 WINSitiN AS50CIATE5 PAGE 03 ,
; r
~
THt P~U{L.DING ARGHI7K7URE ICVGLUDH HIGH ?UALITY Dt5IGN ANL
wHIC.}i 1rVGl.U0E NA7UPLQL °ar1'b~* (APP*UX1T'^-rtLY 2_5% f3F 7FIE tXTfii.10R
C-'LEvATlON) INS'tP.1.L.E9 TU APP~-AR AS! PART C7F" 't~-lE DUILDING STAUGTURE Af'dp
Tf-IA: THe DETa1lLD ANC) I iATMioA1.b O~ EAGN f`'OUR PLtX AR,t ~LXF1GItN'R.Y
DIPFER,ENT 30 7HE HUILpWCLS WIL.L NC* APKAR IMN'[`IGAL,
Ti-te NEfGH00P-!~ UN17E!'L5TAhf0 THt_~CHC}OL 15~ NOT IN A PCJ5ITIDN T,C'j GQr'!I"1fT TQ TpiESE
il'EnS lJM"IL Tl•tt C7t7A'.LED EX5.Ghf IS t'UR7FI& ~ ALdI`3G, RA'r"HfR THAhf WiTtiFdQLO i HP
P+`HGFtScsRH4QD"~ .SUPi~C~R7 4F YHE P~iDJEC~' D ETC3 LAGt'S UF -niPK1F1G5 A"r TL-I25 TiM4E
7HEY WOtiLp r2A7h[Ei2 WORK GODPERATivL-LY r'rH Ti-t _~cHcx>L A5 THe r.t-rAiLb or r?iE-
PRQjEC7 CAN 9E °RQ'V'fREC~
~
i
,
THAiV:CS YOV FOP- Ybl1R Gp 'irDiPERA'f'101V OF fwS APPRCIAGN AND WE LOOIK FORwAR37
'(Q YOIJR RE390NnE'
. {
~
i
~~WG~RGtY i
r
WIN~TON Ajn0~IAfiC? SNQ, ~
I ~
~
e,~. ~
;
,
;
~
ROCIM7 L pEP-LLrTz ,c1,).LA. ;
_~C-NraPL ,cti,_5~50ciA-1-e ;
~
r\`NN,r LuDira ;
. DOf'"411a1C MAURIELLO QjRAUN A!xpG~ATeS
1
i
r
?
~
E
~
c
i
t
i
~
;
~ el8/oz
)0]-440,4200 • FA% 703.449•671 i~ WWW.WINSTGMa5SQCIA7Ei.C4n ~ 2294 PEARL }TRBr--.. SUITi 10fl • BOULpER, CO 403G2
~
{
~ MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning & EnVironmental Commission
FROM: Cammunity Development Department DATE: August 12, 2002
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to tne Vail Town Council of a text amendment to
Section 12-7A-7 (Height), Vail Town Code, to increase the maximum allowable
buifdirag height in the Public Acceammodation Zone C7istrict.
Applicant: Bob Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: Gearge Rufher.NVarren Campbel[
L SUMMARY
The applicant, Bob Lazisr, represented by Jay Peterson, is requesting that the Planning and
Environmental CornmissiQn makes a recommendatian to the Uail Town Cauncil for a text
amendment to Section 12-7A-7 (Height), Vail Town Code, ta increase the maximurn ailowable
builc6ing height in the Public Accommodation (PA) Zone District. Cureently the PA Zone District
allaws flat or rnansard roofs to be a maximum of 45 feet in height and sloped roofs to be a
~ maximum of 48 feet in height. This request proposes to increase the maximum hebght of sloped '
roofs to 56 feet and flat or mansard roofs to 53 feet. Staft is recommending that the Pfanning
and Environrnental Commission table the final review of this request to the August 26, 2002,
meeting of the Planning and Environmental Commission, and instead, hold a work session
cfiscussion on the application at this time. A review of discussion issues has been pravicied in
Section IX of this memorandum.
ll. DESCRIPTION OF THE RE4UEST
The applicant, BQb Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson, is proposing a text amendment to
Section 12-7A-7 (Heigh#) of the Vail Tawn Code. The amendment is intended to increase the
rraaximum allowable building height of structures built in #he PubEic Accommadation Zone
District. The applicant is propasing to increase the neight iimitation from 48 feet to 56 feet for
buildings with sioping roofs and from 45 feet to 53 feet for buildings with fiat or mansard roofs.
No other amendments to the PA Zone District devedopment standards are proposed. This
amendment, if approved, would apply ta all properties in the PA Zane District. '
Accarc6ing to the Official Zaning Map, there are seventeen properties in the Town of Vail zoned
Public Accomr-nodation. These pcoperties are generally located around the periphery of the
village commercial care area and include the Austria Haus'', Bavaria Haus, Chateau at Vaii
(Haliday Inn), Christiania Lodge", First Bank of Vail, Galatyn Lodge*, Lat P-3, Mountain Haus, 9
Vaii Road (Haliday House), Ramshorn Condominiurras*, Swiss Chalet, Roost Lodge, TalismaR,
Tivoli Lodge, Vail Athletic Club*, Vail Village Inn*, and Villa l/alhalfa, C)f these seventeen
propeeties, six have received approvals for speciai deveioprrrent districts and have been
~ identified with an asterisk
t
¦
III. BACKGRL3UhlD ~
Qn August 7, 1973, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973 which, in
part, adopted development standards for bui[dings constructed in the Public Accommoclation
Zone District.
On Nouember 15, 1977, the Vail Tnwn Councif approved Ordinance NQ. 30, Series of 1977
which, in part, reduced the rrumber of allowable dwelling units `rn ali the zane districts which
allowed residentiai e,nits artd created a new definition for "accommodatian urrits"
;
On November 18, 1980, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 37, 5eries of 1980,
which, in part, amended the maximum aliowable builcfing height in the Public Accommodation
Zane D?strict and created an amended definitiQn of "height"
C7n Qctober 15, 1991, the Vail Town Council adapted the DEVELOPMENT CQDE REVISI{)N
REPORT Phase I"An Assessment of the Town of Vail Zonrn Cade and
Recommenda#ions for Activn" The purpose of this report is ta analyze the regulations
preseribed in the Town af Vail Zoning Regulations and make recornmendations for
improvements. Upon review af the developmenf standards prescribed for the district, the repart
recornmertds amendments to the density control provisions. It makes na reference or
recommendations far amendments to the building height standard.
On January 21, 1997, the Vail Town Cauncil approved Ordinance No. 22, Series af 1996, which
added fractional fee clubs as a conditional use in the Publie Accommodation Zone District and
set forth detaifs in regard thereto. ~
On 8ctober 5, 1999, the Vail Town C4uncil approveci Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1999, which
provicEed for a comprehensive amendrrlent to each of the development standards prescribed for
the Pub9ic Accammodation Zone District with the exception of building height. Building height
was considered and evaluated during the discussions regardEng the amendment, however, it
was determined at that tirne that the maximum building height should not be amended.
The approved text amendments included:
• fncreasing afiowable GRFA from SO% to 150% of the buildable area c?# the site.
• lncreasing the allavuable site caverage frorn 55% ta 65% while rnainiaining tFae minemurn
landscape requirement at 30% of the site area.
+ Amending the definition of a"lodge°to state, in part, "that the gross residenfial floar area
devafed to accvmmodatiora unrts is equal fo or greater than 70°r of the tofal grass
residential floor area on the site. "
• Amending the deveiopment review process to irr7plement a process similar to the
prflcess adopted for Lionsheacf. This process requires Planning and Enviranmental
Commission consideratian of all proposals for projects which add accommodation units,
dwePling units, fractional fee units, more than 1,000 square feet of commercial floor area
or common space, or any project that has substantiaf off-site impacts, as determined by
the administratar. The Design Review Board continues to be responsible for the review
of all projects, regardless of unit types, square footage, etc. The process also includes a
compliance burden and mitigation of development impacts requirement.
i
2
~ IV. ROL,ES OF REVIEVIlING BODIES
Planninq and Enviranmental Commission:
Actron: The PEG is advrsory to fhe Town Council.
The PEC shal9 review the pEOposal far and make a recommendatian to the Tcawn Council ora
the campatibility of the praposed text changes for consistency with the Vail Comprehensive
Pfans and impact on the general welfare of the community.
Desiqn Review Board:
Actron: The DRB has NO review authority on code arnendmenfs. `
Town Cauncil:
Action: The Town Council is responsible for final approvaffdenial ara cade amendrnents.
The Town Council shall review and apprave #he praposal based on the compa#ibility of the
proposed text changes for cansistency with the Vail Comprehensive Plans and impact on the
general wveliare of the cammunity.
Staff:
The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided, The staff
advises the applicant as to compliance with the Zoning Regulations.
~ Staff provides analyses and recommendatrans to the PEC and Town Cauncil on any text
praposaf.
V. APPLICABLE PLAFJNING DOCUMENTS
Town of Vail Zon6ng Regudations (Title 12, Wail Town Cade)
GHAPTER 7
GQMMERCIfiL AND BUS1NES5 DiSTRICTS
ARTICLE A. PUBUG ACCOIUIIIAODATIC)N (PA) QISfiRICT
12-7A-1: PURPOSE:
The Pubaic Accomrnodatian Distriet Es intended ta provide sites for lodges and residential
accommodations far visitors, tagether with such public and serrei-public facilities and limited I
professianal offices, medical facilities, priva#e recreation, commerciaUretail and related visitor
oriented uses as may appropriately be Iocated within the same dEStriet and cornpatiblE with
acfjacent land uses. The Public Accornmodation District is intended to ensure adequate light, air,
open space, and other amenities commensurate with locfge uses, and ta maintain the desirable
resort qualities of the Qistrict by establishing apprapria#e site development standards. AdditEanal
nonresidential uses are permitted as carrditianal uses which enhance the nature of Vail as a
vacation community, and where permitted uses are intended to function compatibly with the
~ high density fodging character ot the District. (Ord. 23(1999) '1: C3rd. 30(1977) ' 7: 0!rd. 8(1973)
7.14Q)
3
~
12-7A-7: HEIGHT:
Far a flat raof or mansard roaf, the height of buildings shall nat exceed fiorty five fieet (45). For a
slaping raaf, the height of buildings shall not exceed farEy eight feet (48'). (Ord. 23{1999} ' 1:
Ord. 37(1980) ' 2)
HEI+GHT; The distance measured vertically frarn any pflint on a proposed or extsting roQf ar
eaves #o the existing ar finished grade (whicheuer is mQre restrictive) located directly below said
paint of the roof or eaves. Within any building footprint, height s'hall be rneasured vert?ca91y fram
any point on a proposed ar existing roof to the existing grade directly below said point on a
praposed or existing romf.
Vail Village Master Plan
i
A majority of the properties in the PA Zane Dis#ricf are included within the Vail Village Master
Plan Boundary, None of the properEies are lacated within the Commercial Core I area, however
several properties are located within the area delineated to be included in the Urban Design
' Guide Plan.
Buildinq Heiqht Plan
I
Generally speaking, it is fhe goal af this Plan to maintain the cancentration of low scale buildings
in the core area while positioning larger buildings along the northem periphery (along the
, Frontage Road), as depicted in the Buildirtg Height Prafile Plan. Thos pattern has already been ~
established and in some cases these larger structures alang the Frantage RQad serve to frame
views over Vail Village to Uail Mountairt. The BuFlding Height Plan also strives, in some areas, I
to preserve major views from public right-of-ways.
Building heights greatly influence the character of the built environment in the Village. This is
particularly true in the Village Core where typical buifding heights of three to four stories
establish a pleasing human scale.
The buiiding heights expressed on this ll{ustrative Plan are intended to prov?de genefial
guidelines. Additional study shauld be made during specific project review relative to a
building's height impact an the streetscape and relationship ta surrounding structures. Specific
design consideration on build'rng heights are faund in the Sub-Area section of this Plan and in
the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan.
A cogy of the Canceptual Building Height Plan and other relevant sections frorn the Vail Village
Master Plan and Urban Design Considerations has 6een attached for reference.
Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
The 1Jaii Village Urban C7esign Guide Plan was adopted by the Town of 11ai10n June 11, 1880
and subsequently revised on January 15, 1993, The Guide Plan represents callective ideas
about functional and aesthetic olajectives for Vail Village. Diagrammatic in nature, the Guide
Plan is intended to suggest #he nature 4f the improvements desired. lt is based on a number af •
urban design criteria whicn have been deterrnined ta be appropriate principles for guiding
4
~ change in Vail VilEage. As such, the Guide P[an is a response to current issues and perceived
problems, and intended to be a guide current planning in both the public and private sectors.
Guide Plan recommendations of particular importance to this request are:
A. Street Enclosure
B. Buildeng Height
C. SurtfShade
D. Views and Focal Points
A copy of each af these Design Considerations has been attached fiar reference.
VI. 51'T'E ANALYSIS
[n 1899, Staff prepared a site analysis for each of the properties in the Town a# Vail that are
IQCated in the Pubfic Accommodatidn Zane District. The locatian of the properties was deriWed ,
from the Official Touvn of Vail Zoning Map. The purpose af the analysis was to provide a
camparative analysis of the development cons#ructed an each of the respective sites. A capy of
the 1999 5ite Anafysis has been attached for reference.
Vli. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONiIVG
~ According ta the C)fficial Town of Vail Zoning Map, praperties zoned Public Accommodation are
generaNy located around the periphery of #iae vill'age commercial core area. Further, ihe Vail
Land Use Pfan designates the village commerciaE care area as "Vai! Mlaster Plan" Pursuant ta
the Vail Land Use Plan, the Vail Master Plan designation indicates the Village Core Area where
development and growth is guided by the goals, objectives and po1icies as outlined in the Vail
Village Master Plan (adopted Novernber 1$, 1986). An exceptian to the genera] spatial location
of the Public AccommodatiQn Zone District around the periphery of the vilfage cammercial cflre
area is the Roost Lodge. The Roost Locige is 9ocated at 1783 North Fron#age Road. According
to #he Vail Land Use Plan, the Roost Lodge has a land use designatian of "Medium Derrsity
Residentia!":
Vfll. CRIfiERfA AND FINDINCS
A. Consideration of Factors Re ardin the Pro osed Code Amendment
~ Before acting on an applicatian #or an amendmen# to the reguiatidns
prescribed in 7itle 12, the Planning & Environmenta! Commission and Tawn
Cauncil shall cansider the following factQrs with respect #o #he requested text
amendm+ent:
1. The extent to which the #ext amendmen# furthers the general and
specific purpases af the Zoning Regulatians; and
2. The extent to rrvhich the text amendment wou[d better implement and
~ better achieve the applicable elements of the adopted goa}s, abjectives,
5
and pQlicies autlined in the Vaii Comprehensive PCan and is compatible ~
with the development objectives nf the Town; and
3. The extent ta whieh the text amendment demnnstrates how canditions
haae substantially changed since the adoption of the subject regulation
and how the exis#ing reguiatian is no longer apprapriate or is
inapplicable; and
4. The exten# ta which the text amendment provides a harmonious,
convenient, workable relationship among land use regulatians
cansistent with municipal derrelapment objectives; and
5. Such other factors ansi criteria the Commission andlar Council deem
applicable ta the propased text arnendment.
Befare :ecommending andfor granting an approval of an applicatian for a text
arnendmertt the Planning & Environmental Cammission and the Town Council
shall make the following findings with respec# tc, the requested amendment:
1. That the amendment is consistent with the applicab[e elements of the
adapted goals, objeetives and po[icies outlined in the Vail
Comprehensiue Plan and is compatible with the ,development
objectives of the Town; and
2. That the amendment furthers the general and specific purposgs of the ~
Zaning Regulations; and ~
3. That the amendment promates the health, safety, morals, and general !
wel#are of the Town and pramotes the coardinated and harmonious
development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its
natural environrnent and its established character as a resart and
ressdential cornmunity of the highest quabity.
1X. DISCUSSION ISSUES
The Gommunity aevelopment Department has identified a number of issues that we
believe need to be addressed during the review and c4nsideration of this text
amendment praposal. The fallowing is a list of issues:
1. impacts on building bulk and mass and the effects that may have an the
character of the area.
2. Impacts on the availability of light and air to surrouncfing uses.
3. Impacts on sun/shade on adjacent properties and public spaces.
4. Impacts on views from public spaces and estabiished view corridors.
5. Impacts on the encfosure af streets and spaces between bui9dings.
6. lmpacts on the urban design considerations with respect to the heigh# af
eaves ancf overhangs.
7. Impacts on the development objectives af the Town of VaiL ~
6
~ X. STAFF RECQMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the final review of a request '
for a recommendation to the VaiM Town Council to aflow for a text amendmen# to Section
12-7A-7 of the Vail Tawn Code be tabled to the August 26, 2002 meeting af the F'lanning
and Environmental Commission. We further recommencf that the Planning and ~
Environmental, the applicant, the public and staff engage in a dialague with respect to
the issues surrounding the proposed text amendment and identify questions that may
need furfiher clarificatCon, prior to the Planning and Environmenial Commission
forwarding its recommendation ta the Vaal Town Councal.
XI. ATTACHMENTS
A. Gonceptuaf Building Height Plan (I/aiE Viflage Master Pian)
8. Building Height Profile (Vail Village Master Plan)
C. Vail Village Urban design Guidelines
D. 1999Site Analysis
E. Typical Room Seetion
F. MuEtiple Photographs of the existing Austria Haus, Vail Mountain Lodge and the
Tivoli Lodge
G, Rendering af futuce Tivoli Lodge
H. Sun/Shade Plans
~
I
I
~
7
~
~
~
Z
~~'h'S Z~ ~
I r
1 f "
~
' Z
J
2
!
i
I?q ` y
I 7 ~q'~~I'' llr?" ft#~ ~ ~ ~I~ ` ~ ~~n • .
w.
~h i,
~ . { 4 = y ~ F F' ~f
~ ff~ ~ . ' ~ i r ~ f ~ 1:~ r~f•~ r~l~
i r I
~C,y
t09~
~ ~ ~ ~ ti-> J ~+r~r ~G IrE~llrr ~ii ~m ~
1•I
ce)~
~;y, 1`~''~i~ ~ I' - - ~l,/~~~r(~t~fifili~,ll~~~,vr''V m° _ ~
1"f €1 E~
,lt
i'
9e~~~}•. ~~~r ii,i,fl p~ 'ar !r ' ~ ~ii niI~1~~'< <~,~1,/J~~ ~I 34 Wo=
8°~
~'IFI' z°az ~
3 ~
~iY 11 st aF
k 1 ,~i. x I I
j I! 1,~1.
ii
~
Ikt r; f ~
~ij
LO
JJ~
"f~I~~I
JJ
do~p~f~~i~k
i
r!
~f
Ni
'
~ if~.~~I ~I!~~~~~i ~~~g~~ ~1 ~r ~d i i~,7 i.• ~ ~ ~ ~.ti „al ~ 1 ~ 4 ~ \~'y;~~
~ W ~~~{p , ~ ~ ~'~,?~,~t r~itp~'~ ~~~~~~~t~, 1",.~?~T.
Af#achment: A
Yn,'A,,
~ .
? 1~ e~"f
c~
~ .
~a
~ d
W
O ~ ul
~
i ~
~ Iz
,
t!')
cr-
'0
__--1
oq
Vaif Village Urban Design Guidelines ±
it is not intended to enclose a71 ~
Yillage streets with buildings, as in the Cnre Area. Nor is it desireable to
leave pedestrian streets in the open •
and svmewhat undefir?ed condition ~
evident in many other areas of Vail.
Rather, it is desired to have a
variety of open nnd enc7osed spaces,
both built and landscaped rrhich
create a s'br-ang framework for •
pedestrian wsl ks as wel l as visual .
interest and activity.- • ~ ~
D. STREET FNCLOSURE j
~
4,hile building facade heights should ~
nat be uniform from building t4
buiiding, they shouid provide a
. ri.
"comfortab]e" enclasure for the . ..-`t
street, ~~'T
r ' r• ~
Pedestrian streets are outdoar rooms .
~ yr
Nhose walls are farmed by the buildings, '
The shape and feel of these 'rooms'
are created by the variety af heights
and massing (three-dirrrensional vari- ` f I
atians} which giwe much of the visual ~~'mlvl : I
interest and pedestrian scale unique ~
.
to Vai7. ~
Ver-y general rules, about the perceptian
of exterivr spaces haae been developed
(empirical7y) by designers, based on
the characteristics of human vision.
They suggest that:
an externa7 encZosure is mcast ~
~
comfortabi e where i ts wal7 s are
approxitnately ~2 as high as the ~ width of the space enclosed; •
1
if the ntio falls to jk ar less,
the space'seems unenclased, and
. • .
.
• . ~
if the height is greater than the . i ;
width, it cvmes to resemble a
canyan. !
!
Attachment: C 4
, Vail Village Urban Design Guidelines
In actual application, facades are •
Seldom unifDrm in hetight on both sides
~ pf the street, nvr is thas desired, j-
Thus, same latitude is appropriate
-in the appl7cation of this ;I - to - 7 ' .
• rativ. Using the avera e facade height
- of both sides will generally still
be a guide to the "comfartableness"
- of the enelasvre being created. X h.~ t.y~ }p,Gx
' • ' Z
~
~ .
: Zn same inst,a.rices, the 'canyon' effect
is acceptable and even desirable
for example, as a short-connecting . bi~~• _
. ]#nkage between i arger s paces - to
give variety to the walking experience.
'For svn/shade reasans, it is aften
advantageous to orient any longer
segments in a north-south direction.
Long canyan StrEet5 in an ea5t-Nest
` direction should generaiiy_6e -
discouraged.
When exceptians to the 9eneral height
criteria otcur, special desigr? ean- ~,pPeY bt ,
siderat7on should be g7ven to creating
a weTl-defined ground f7aor pedestrian •
emphasis t4 overcame the Canyon effect. . ~4a((
Canopies, awnir+gs, arcade and - - -
building extensions can.all create
a pedestrian fOCIlS and divert . ,y
attentian fron upper building
heights and 'canyon' effect. , are3 Canpp~',+e~~.
. For other considerations on
bui 7 ding massing see: • z_ .
Building Height . .
5un/Shade
Vi err s ' _ - T -
Street Edge •
~
~
. 5
Vail Village Urban Design Guidelines ,
. P7azas, patios, green areas are im- -
portant focal point5 for: gathering,
reStlng, arienting and should be . ~
distributed throughout the Yi7lage
With due consideration to:
- spacing
- sun acces5
- Opportun1tie5 fOr Y'1QW5
- pedestrian activity .
See also: _
! Sun/Shade '
Bui]ding Height ,
Street EnclasUre
Wiews
• I
F. 613ILQING HEIGHT
8asicaily,-the Vi11age Care is perceived as a nix af twa and three story
facades,. ajthauch there are aiso fQUr and five stary buildings. The mix
0-11 building heights aives variety to the street--which is desirzble. The
height criteria are intended tv encaut-aa6 height and rassing variety and
to dZSCoUr'3g2 unifarm buiiding heights along the street. ~
The definition of heiSht shall be as it is in the Yail Municipa1 Code, Bui7ding
height res*rictions in Gorr.merciaa Core I shai] be as fo77ows: ~
1. Up to 60% of the building (building coverage area) rray 6e buiit to a
- heigt;t af 33 rEet ai- 1ess.
2. No more than 40% of the build-Ing (building caverage area) my be higher
than 33 feet, but not higher than 43 feet.
3. Tewers, spires, cupola5, chinrtieys, flagpoles, and similar architectural
features nat useab]e as Gress Residential Fioor Area may extend above
. the height 1 imit a distance of nat more than twenty-five pereent of
the heiyht limit nQr more xhan rifteen feet. .
4, The a6ove heights are based on an assumed 3 fee4 in 12 feet or +4 feet
~ in 12 feet roaf pitches. Fo accamnadate and encourage steeper roaf
. pitehes (up to 6 fieet in 12 feet), sZi9ht, propartionate hcight increases
could be granted so Iong as the height.of building side walls is nox
incTeased (see diagram fol]owfng).
r
7
Yail Village Urban Design Guidelines
rZ
r ~ .
. ~ ' •
2'{e1 gh$ Cf '
~ 5ide .
'W31 ] .
' doES nat ' •
_ .3ncreas2 , •
. ~
~ .
~
~
8
SUNlSHADE
Due to Vaii's alpine clamate, sun is ~~,y! ~„r~rl9
an important cc>mfort factor.
, especial1y in winter, tall and spring. ~~f f~1• ~
Shade areas have ambient
tempecatures substantially below
those of adjacent drrect sunlit areas. ex1~fi11g
On all but the warmest of summer
days shade can easily Iawer ~
temperatures below camtortable
Ievels and thereby negatiwely impact
uses of thase areas.
Ail new or sxpanded buildings - . - . _ . _ ' _ . . . .
should not substantially increase the spring and fall shadow pa#tern (March 21 tfurough September 23)
on adjacent properties or the public
R.O.W. or
~ .
In a 11
II buiEding constnaction, shade
shall be considered in massing and
overall height consaderatEOn. rwi? .
Notwithstanding, sunJshade j
considerations are not intended to restTict building height aElQwances,
but rather to infRuence the massing ~~~l~~~ • .
af auildings. Limited height
exceptions may be granted to meet
this cfiteria. ,
Additians to existing buiidings may
be created in several ways #o avaid - extending shadaw patterns. - y
. ~
rvr
~
~t'~L~' •
. -5pr'r~j ~f
f
' • y . . b~~. ~
- .
PAGE 11 • t'~x ,•~'~c, ;
g •
~ . LC
~..i..a tiorrax '
b
' C. V1EWS AND FflCAL POINTS
~ VaiCs mountain/valley settirrg is a
tundamental ,part of its identi#y.
Views of the mountains, skJ slopes,
' creeks and other natural features
are reminders of #he mountain
enviranment and, by repeated
visibility, are orientation referenca
points. Certain building teatures
also provide important orientation
reierences and vfsuaf focaI paints.
The most signfficanf view corddors
have been adapted as part of
Chapter 18.73 af the Vail Municipal
Gode. The view carridors adopted
should not be considered
exhaustive. When evaluating a
development proposal, priority
should be given to an anaiysis of
the impact of the project an views.
Views that should be preserved
origfnate from either rnajor .
pedestrian areas or pubCic spaces,
arrd Include views of the sw
mountaln, the Gare Range, tha
~ Glock Tower, the Rucksack Tower W
and other important man-made and -
natural elements that tontribute ta ~
the sEnse of place assaciated with Y° .
Vail. 7hese views, which have
been adopted by ardinance, were chosen due to their sigRificance, not
onay from an aesthetic standpoint, ~•i
but alsa as arientation referenca ~
points far pedestnans. ,
DeveloAment in Vaif Viqage shaE1
not encroatch info any adapted rriew
eorridor unfess aAPraved under
Chapter 18.73, Adopted corridors
are Iisfed in ChaAter 18.73 of the
,
Vail Municipal Code. W
hether
affect, 'n9 adaPed ~ v'
t . ew
Ct?ITidOFS oC
. ,
_
, - .
~ RAGE 8A .
~
~
r?ot, the im,pact of propased
development on views frorn pedest(ian ways and pubiic spaces
must be identitied and considered
, where appropriate. Tfie Vai! Land
Use Pdan, Tawn Po(icies, the Urban
17eslgn Guide Pians, and other adopted master plans, shall be used bJ~c~c~ v,ew vr!Yj) •
to help determine which views may
by affectecl, and ttow tney shauld be :
addressed.
(C)rdinance No. 18, Series of 1992) +le
;
. ,
PAGE 9
moiew
- ARCHITECTURE/LANDSCAPE
CC3NSIDERATI4NS .
! .
RatFs
Flhere visible, roofs are aften one of
the n,ast doudnant architectural elernents
i n any bui 7 t envi ronment. in the Yi 1lage
roof form, calor and texture are visib7y
dorinant, and generally cansistent, which
tends to unify the building diversity to ~
a great degree. . ;
The current expressian, and objective,
for raofs in the Viliage is to fQr-m '
~ a consistently unifying backdrop for _
the architecture and pedestrian
' streetscape, and to avoid roofs which
tend to stand out individuaily or
distract visualiy frflm the overall
character. • '
Raaf Forms
Roofs within the Village are typieally gabie in for:n and of moderate-tc,-lnw -
pitch. 5hed raofs are f requent7y
.
used far small additions to iarger
. . . . , : . . . . . . . . . . . , .
buildings. Free-standing shed rnofs, butterfly roafs and flat
roofs, cari be found in the Yillage
b~ut they are•generally cvrrsidered s
to be out of character and inapprop- i
riate. Hap roafs likewise are rare
and generally incon`sistent with the
character of the Care Area. Towers
mre exceptions, i n beth farm and ,
pitch, to the general criteria, but . do have an establ i shed local veinacular style which should be '
respected. '
~ . `
,
. ,
;
12
P1 tCh ~
Roof.slapes in the WIl3age typically ~range frQm 3/12 to 6/12, with slightly
steeper pitches in limited applieation5. Again, for visual consistenty this
general 3/12-6/1Z range shou] d he
~ preserved, (See Canstruction below.) •Oyerhan9s
Generous roof overhangs are al so an
established architectural feature in
the Yiliage a traditional €xpression
af shelter ir, a]pine environments.
Roof overhangs typicaliy range fram
3 to 6 feet on a71 edges. 5peci fi c
design considerativn shouid be given
to proteetion of pedes'trian ways
adjacent to buildings. Tee falls,
snow slides, and runaff hazards can
fle reduced by roaf arientatian, gutters, arcades, etc. ~
Overhang detaiTs are treated with
varying degrees of ornamentation. _
Structurai elements such as roof beams are expressed beneath the c?verhangs,
simply ar decoratively carved. The
roof fascia is thick and wide, giving
a substantial edge to the roof. e.K
COmpo5it10n5
The intricate roofscape af the Vil7age
bs a whole is the result of many in-
dividual simple roaf canfigurations.
Far any single buiiding a varied but
simpTe composition of roof planes is
preferred to either a sing7e ar a ' 'com,plex arrarrgement af many roofs. As .
Zndividual roofs become mare complQx ~~r~ st,~f~ ?r~~'pfaNc ~ F~r s~µr~i Rk,~.
the toof attracts ri5ual attention
away from the streetscape and the total' roofscape tends towsrd "busyness" rather
than a backdrap composition. r~ P1aur5 ~
~
~
13
~
5tepped itoofs
~'s buildings are stepped to reflect
~xi sti ng grade charrges, resul ti ng roof
steps should be made where the height
change wiil be vlsually significant.
Yariatians which are toa subtle appear .
to be mQre 5tyl75tiC than fur+ctional,
- and out of character with the mor,e
straight-forward roof design typical
in the Viilage.
a
Materia7s ;
Waod-shakes, woad shingles, and built-
up tow and gravel are almost exclusivel3
used as roof materldl5 in the Vi77age. ,
(5ee ConStruction below.) For visual i
_ons3 stency any other materia7 s shoul d
have the appearance vf the above. .
ConstructiQn
Comnon roof prablems and design con- ;
5lderdt7Qn5 in this c.3imate incTude:
- SnOw511de5 onto pedestr9an waiks
- gutters fretzing
- roof dams and water infi'i trati an
- heaVy 5now lOdds
Careful attention to these functional
' details is recarrmended, as well as -
familiarity with the lacal bui7ding
code, prvven construction details,
and tawn ordinances.
For built-up roafs, pitches af 4J12
or steeper do not hold gravel well. '
For shingle roofs, pitches of 4,+12
or shallower aften resu3t in ice
~ dams and backflow leakage under
' - th,e Shingle5. ,
14
s ~
Cald-rovf construction is strangly
prefetred, raniess warm-roof benefits ~~r~~~ ~
for a speci i'i c app7 i catic~r~ can be
demonstrated. Co1d-roafs are double-
roafs which insulate and prevent snow
mel t from i nternal buii ding heat, By
retaining snow on the roaf, many af
the probiems listed can be reduced. '
P2riQd1C snow rernova7 will be required .
and shouid be anticipated in the Clf*afafrrO design. y~, aw,c~G+J~e
Roof gutters tend to i ce-i n compj etely r~ ~W • ~l ay a!r I
and become i neft'ectr ve in the Ya i 1 Q~ rns+dr spke
climate, especially in sF~aded north- h~f P
I
side locations. Heating the interiar Sn~' on ft~C ~
circumference with heat-tape el'ements
or other- devices is generaliy nec-
essary to assurs adequate runoff
control in co]der months.
~
. ~
I
i
• i
~
15
I
i
, I
. ~
~
~
(DI
~ e\° o E'fF 'o 'M . L[5 tt5 ~ o t"~ S*~ o C~ t'[3 fI5 lC$
C ~ ~
~
00 t0 't 1`- CV ° to r C_tl M ~ 04
~ ~ tf7 4 d' 4 ~ ~ ~ N ~ 4C? C ~ ~
m
~ a
N a) LC3 bO CD N 60 O0? CO
O t ~ ~ ~ ~ ,r r e-~ r ~
o .v r O~ i~ cD cv O a0
N
~ y.
o
`6
o 0 4 o Q Q. c, o C~ a
L[] C"? CD 0~ L"o Cl-. G? C~ SC3 m t1l
V) 'rs E
. . ce
' . . .
~
m
ca cts E
o -
~ ~ ° ° o 0 0 o N o 0 0 ~
- a ao C) ooo aaoNry c cCY) ~
~ o ~
~
y
0 C
~ C
I... E~
E ~ ~tD~N c c COtNf1 ~ ~N~ C c C ~ U
a
~ v ~ ~
CA cn -~v
W ~ 0-1 ~o o 0 0 0 0 ~ o co oo
O t7 °o ~ uo CU. (n 10 cr) co
N ' o`
L
(D
11 ~ v M m
m ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ m m 2
--crLO -r,-LnLn 0--It Ln->M v--r~cO
= Q ~I N N ~t7 ~ N ~ C4 6 r C11 ~ ~ Op {~y ~
~ N M IC:T m C'7 r ~ CV? m lO m
0 ~
h" ..n.
0 U~ 0 U U U U U~ U U U~ U U
~ R~ m m {[S (U m -0 M {I3 m R3 {0 fl3 > .
Z > ?.f) ~ C~D O~~0] lf~ ~ Cx] ~ C33 N r'd: c~t
W y ~?C39 Mtc~cp .tCD ~cD~d:f~d:C")y
y i N
N f~ ~
O
W A ~ Q) ~ L'~37 ~ ~ ~
1 R3
M (D
> ~ ~ ~ H C sn
a i f Q (1) Ua 0 C31 ~ V~ C~ t~
' W n~s Q ° _ M -G J a ¢ j 0 to c tm ~
I O c rt~ c~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ca to +L) ~ ~ . + as u~
, > <
a~ L
' O~ n~~vE0~ m m•~-
~ LL, ~ ~ ~ ~ t sv t~ ? 'N > 0 - o ~a o
LL r" 'Q m U C'~ C~ H.1' Q co i-- uL tn > z
~ ` Attachment: D
zOdz `Z isn$nV 9617C-C # 90(
99E£'6trh'EO£ DMA woxu2lSaCpMNa210o1ti1
£EtrY`6YV'EDE 'I01 S~.). Y 1 J[~ S s Y
ZOfOB 07 li'PlnOs ~
L 1~,~ ~ o3'irvn ot L 2I,R+s tJ:7153C7 bQ12131N]
/t N0IJ.D3S pan5 aarudg trE4L 'ONINNYId
W002! IVDIdJI.L 3Dp01 1I0,+411 a:)WQ iapjnn8 `3bf11:73J.uH33iv'
nsaa iuos-n
~
V ~ -
i~ .
~
zr7
V ~ y ~
Ln ~
Y
CA
: a.
1A6pdOi jO Jo'1}e"'iLtI1JaCj {g
z -
wooN 10 Jazua:~) ~
• u~'J~C «-i$ ~
u ~ 7
~
q) ~
ol icsol} iealo
r•
~
1 I
Attachmen#: E
~ ~-..-7-77 _ I
~
.
fi
.
.
.
~ ~ '~a ~ ,~kL,• t ~f
Mr~'""
I
41,
S
~
~ , . . . . . ' ~ ~ ~ d s ~ ~ ~a~~ ~
~
co ~
w, ri r..~ y,~1 . 7
F?
` ,.yz y~y~,•~~, a ~ ~ ~ r~' ~
cr)
y M.'5 ,y.. rt S
~ ~
~
.
~ y
LL
~ ~ +K Ft ~
. _ 1yl•j'r1'~- y ~
k a ^ ~~~ir '~x~+~ ~
1/^~ ~ ~ ~ ~1,4 r ~~•~{~°j~• k , J ; ' wP r'°~r'i.`~~ar +r ~ t
- ~.-:-~aYi+'-uSrYr 1 S~•.. "1„ - JI
. ~ 4 f
' f. - . . / ~ . ~ I
~
t pd _ 1:..- • ~ ~ r'~+" ..r~-~ X K~ 'k~'''j~, ~ n ~ I
~ yZ f z s ~ ~ ~
4-,
+ rq s
i?~cT^: , r9 ~ Rr^ r•-a+a.au- y!~ ^~^r+A .~wd'~~`r`~~~~' ? ~ ~
•ss {d ~ •.~.z ~ s' :
q~~~ p y q
~stiee 5.74~•. A.1 m+F,10Jk^w ,.n. '_R . +«7 ~ ~ t}.~.. L
7 sF
Pf~f~ T .1 c ~4
.
„
i e -
d
m
d _a ~
~Q ~ , R 3f
-
~ ~ A ~ ~
- - -
~I f ~ x ~ . . t . R l ~ ~ _ Ir.. ~
NM~'
Lru
~ ~ . ~ . - - ~ ar~~~•y ~ . ~ ~
- ' , ~a•, i ~
~
F . ~ Y
; ~
yy_
y
µ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~~,s--~++.. .rr~.f~~' ..i~ ~`~''~:Y...~ i.~+~y~~~.~'-~"~~.s~~ ~,~`'f•.~i,, ~
~ F s.w~~~~. ~ ~f . ~'r 1.z IP 1'Y~•~~S'* ',#~+.~.g ~r•'~ 'i~
~ t J' ~ 1F`~ ~ ~ ~ 1~`S _ $ . ~ I~Z aJ
T3~~,°i'"~i'-~~y, . _ y'~ . f.'?.1w~~ ~ ' 1~~~ ~ ^ ~
F~ ~ ~ti
~ ~ x 1 r 4 i ~ 's, ~ ~ ~
~.1
.
, : r.. ~
~
.
V
r ~
r~~ . _ :,c.. r.,~.,~..~~_ . , p._ - , , y~'; a;:. w. ~ ~'.?.I~ , . ~ vaG.y ..~':~'J S
3~' . ~ a . , ~ .O ~ ~ . 5 Iy, 5 a . ~ > . h ~ i ~ • ~
.
. ~ . . . . i.
+
,
2
d A
i ~
i
cc
Akt-
A
t0
' +iM« .M~-..~.b-..~+.~ e »n~-w~...Mw - au.~..avrw-rat~,vx~w._._.a(r. ~6'rp?~k,. , ~
77-7
~
,
d
t 'j~ + xµ -~t
r.
p , ~~;~t 3 n I yl I! y s
A''
9 , ~4 w , ~5 ~ ~'1?t
.arras ~ym?~~~~~~ ~ .~~i {rf o- z ~ °f
i
r ~ ~~e,4 ' ~i' ' P~e ~ ~ ~9'•"' 'w . `
,
,
~
p ~ ~
s * ~
. # f
J ,i.
~
.
F
J F:
~ ~ .
,
z f ~ [
F _ i ~ t *n ~w . f
~ ~a,~' ``~p.~•.G a~ wr'
..i k,{
cn
La
r
, .
~,r ,~~~~T, ~ 1 • ~
77.
.
in
•w d,~ sj ,,k~.r ~C~ rX .
. , ~ ~ ~ ',.~~'-•~i.i~' .frr`.~'~ .t.
s; -~1°+Y•r1- . . . ~ - f ~ ~ M ,
; e
~ 71 ~ - :
, r<+
~l ' ~a , s' r--°' . ~ -
2(_. 3.
~ ~ . ..c ~-.~„~,t, ,~yr',°,~ . • . ~i t 4 ~ , _y,;: ~ .5'
r
ir-C
~f
i,y~i~, "M~ D 1~ r ~ • a,~j.t~`~.. ~ . f w` 4 .
~
' , X sr~ '~r~:Y~~.V ~f ' r",'' ~tY'! ' ~ ~y ~
~ , • ~ ? ~
y~+ • i~.
41
Y~~ rw; ~ i g f°
.
~;~,r f ~ ~1- z F ' r , ~ r J ~rr' . a ; ,w~~.
c~. . ~ + ~ ~..w1, 1 •.4'!~'' ~ ~ .~"1. _'7~' • ~ 1~j
'~'4"~ _i j~ ~ ~'k, ..h~ ~ f 7..~p'-{.Pr~~~
~ I,V .*e!'~~
vy S 4 {
1 Yf ~ 'l~a.". I ~P q- ~r~,~- .'s-' i ~r
~
+ ~ ' `r ~ i~ ~ ,
.
- ~I?."~
. n ~
« at y T , ~
~ ~ . . . ; -LA
3 . .-ti
.y~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F-
q , •r`~•
.
hrc
+ > f ~
A
5 ~r _ ' ; ~4+ ~u A
~41Z~ KY ~ Y 4~ J
""w;q,-~,~ ~~`.°'C.G 'a `1 4 t ?
0 ~y~'+ 8,~ ~ ' . ~ p t~
r P
~p-
f~''F
l( ~ ~f.,~ j 'ZA .9
X YK1r v - ~ ~ 1 ~ ?
~ , li + ; i : , : ~s
,
c y,~' . :j i, S~-. :E AY. y.
~ (j~^ • . _ ~ -
• ~ YC~-
5 r' # ~X~ ~w ' ~ _ W d 3•~ d
s},
_ S•j
t
t t a
r t
....yy~ ,~x m°..
~ 4 Y.. y ~ ~~a h k
{ ~ ~ T y ^I : ~ i g $ ~T
~
t ~ p b a
f ~
. wr v ~ r., d'• 'a'wrFi .s.. . ~ .
4 . _ .
'f:`€
k
~ ~ * { ~ i R ° y~ ~
!
Y Y ~
lk y
5qAy ~ ~ ~ 6 - a ~
.
, . . . . . . . :,.=,~t?„
I
s •~w" " . p
~ ~r~~~ • ~ i~~ e, y ~ ..~y}~t .
2 e i
5 Ni+ r, .3~i~".yfR't?t~ ji~~y -:1a.~ ~
~ ' ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ( •
E ' ~ q •~r . ~ _ d,
Y
4A
M
4~ ~
t ~ \ f.y ~ ~ ~
~~1
t-
~
W
~ u } ~~I
4*~~
w ~ 1~r t , k ~ : ~Y^:
~ `*r .w *T' x. ~"r~x' ~ k~~.ja. - ~
k
~ i
r .s
.
e3 ,
. ,
T $ ~
p ~ r ~4
5 (
I' T"~~ d Y y p ~ ,p ~ a a u
5 ~
*~StA~,t
-A
i3.
C..
~
~
W q r 1
s
5.. .
atr.~~i
~JW
A''~w'v"'{'s~_~ "~k~' fy{'~">#'.l'•,~' , ~tp~++p r~,~
~4 n x At.
14.
~
~
R `.J
-77
E • . ~ . , • f , . T y 5"
. j
.
s' rr r
M WO
0
~ ~ _.~.~j . ~-=w:~:y~ _a~+•.~ ~ ~ t-.. 5%
••"he.'°-t .1
~ _ ' ~ 4•;~~ 'I~. ~ ~
xve~
y •+1~ ~'a~ a Y ~ ro--" r~~ • i
~ 1{'tC
.
4p
~
~
0~.
Y ~
~
~ -
x
. !r s f
o ,
~
,
.
.
Is '
.
~
d r1
. . . . . . ~
%if
1 . ~ 4
90
r , !A~% f a 4 ,s.yC'~ ~ ~ ~0 {
h ~ . ~ • ~a ~ s.~'
, . . ^ ~ hv~,
~ - . .
I ^
~~,v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9
;y ^ ( ~ h .:.~3~, ~ rw ~ ~ : .
Ij~
~ ~?W""' ~ P t '"'°°y~ x~ ~6 -~g ~ R < <Pr , ~ ~ ,.3j ~ i r . y .
a•
.
I~
~~3• ~ rfr i ~ X ~,f .,'N~, _ . . ~ 1. _
~ r~~ .ja 4, ~ ' ~~-7~*_~,9~`~~dq . r .
~ , . ,yL "T ~ ~ ~ ~ "~a ~ ~y~,~:< ,1 df ~F'' J t L j, itw ~ . - ~T i .rij r
~
y ' e
t+ i . sYA ^ n F~ . 1`},.~aw* ~-~;°+.L'4 K!'~ ~ nt ' '
~ .
~ ' ~ ~ ~:k * T _ 4 ~;i'a . F *.`T f~
~ . - ' } . ~ . . „`M1 ~ i~ •~F~~ F
. . * . '~a?' Il~~^~ . f''i-`. . ~ ~;~1' . t,`-...
,
y .
ti
~"'`,.c"•. ~ : ~ ~ "i~.~ y r~: ; .
t;,
s . ~ a~ , : E ~ ;-1 ` ff ~ ;
~c
~
~!'t i ye~ gVr
. ~ _ ~
a,c,~.~'~,M ~ . ;;~~~tt~~°'. ' t..>=~ ~ ~~~ra~, v 7,I3, k.1t'1~! ~f
. f3~~:
.
>
4't ~~t•. - - '.~~i'~.:-r ~ ~ i «t1 F 31n...~+eir'~~' ' ~ ,
* . .
.
yij ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~:tl. ~~,7.~f~ ,r ~ 2!
~ ~ } Q `w4^s ? "J 4 n
ry. s
a 4
~.~~~r
T 3 ~
:,4
l~~+sL`
~ 1n~. ~ .u`- v+. {~d~~f"'~:~•i•.,~ ~ r~r~a~w _S`~iq~~r.,: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
44 q~L, tv A77~;
X1.-~-
~ _ ~,w~..~~•~~*.~,+~°~f,~``w *~~'}'il~~i9„~~~~~,~G~Z,..~~~ ai.r~X ~ ~,~,~~f.,.
,v~'~ s pp~ ~ " 'ri•• • r ~n•a
.k ~'g a~ . 4~ ~i' ~ z,: - r
~ 4~ ~u• # ~ . ~ ! .~~.q+'/
~y. ~j.~
a ~ ~ r ~ : ~ ' ~s.
~ ~ ~ _ •
_}~j.~
'H ,~y. .......~_.._-...e. ein 7 .i ?.4
~ _ ~ , . . ~-7k ~}i{ ~ ' a~
~
~..f .
ii~~~
~ k ~YS' . 1 ` ' f 1 - ~ ~ ~ , \ . ~~ir•• ~ I ! y j~.., ~ S"'
.
~ Y• ~ ~ ~ • "4 t~:~, "ay~ ' ~ ~ ~
. a
-,1 s~,
_ . . ~ ~ . '
~
i lv.
.
. ,
- ~
~ . '
e .
Fa..a-.: s~..Js_~~•' ~sae....~_ 1 ~3::, . . b~. .:^-i~" . .~FT~N .~"'a . ~'r- - • . .
~
, . , . . ,
: ~ _ .
~ , .
-
~ , .
'Pt
r .
<
~
. !
~ r
j
r
ts b~~. - d~ i 2. 4,~ M••.~ ' .
a Q
* d n~ ~ :
q~.~ •.•.Y +M~ef/~n '
? a M1~ '
%
x Z.,
.
; _
. , ~ . . .
~ ~ . .
v
~
,
I . , r . - .
~
. . . . ~ . . . ` . . ~ t
_
k' Y Y w~ ` yy"~'
.
1 t. , . ~ ~ _ . ~ <t.\.. ~ .
y k y r
. . _ . . 1 _ ~ + z'"µ t%k . .
. ~ G~ } AYq~ .
~ .r .
so
~ •
f Y d}°s
co
4f
ti L
~
;
. , ~ . . i^ G: 3
. ~ ~ . i . . .
. . . . ~ t ` jR^. . , _ .
S
y '
` , . x.l ~ . ' .
, . . . . ' ~ . ~ M~..~,_.._.... ~ .m. .
~
~
I
f ~
q` ^ T' -r.itW _ ~
1 - , . , . .i' . , ~
.i.'. . - . . . . _
.
. 1
n. r~{..i' b~• d R.:°-y
. . . . Fi ~ ~ ~ Ar ~ ' . ' .
,
M
~ ~ ' ~~•~Y Y+..'r? ~l~%~J a•i'~~ ~
11
~
~ ..>-'E.e'cs~2~ ~ r 73~ ~j •
+1
• ~yF ~r
. . . ~ .
F
i
t
~
~
$ ~
• e ~ ~1
~ *t
~
~
- .r'~c Y ~
-
y
. . . . . r:' ' _
. . . j.~ . , , r ,
. . } ' } . .
} fi
fs d
Q" l 'd T' 1M1'.
~ ' y, d'~5`~/ y,• ~ ~ 9
ro ?+Y xro ~y? : -e PE
C
(LW
'N . u,
v.
d p
aq~.
rr:r~s ~
¢
~
'n ' . i'... •
F
t ,u
b"
I
i
«e~ 7777
zzzz
r k a~
M _
.
~ d,:,~` p;';~ • K~ ~ a# _ 4q d~'- aH. '+'1 s A~~d *e-q~i:
,
. .
~ ~ Twlk
?f
~
, • , . .
• h ~ . . . .
s - .
~
r
. a -
~ . . . . .G~. A'.~ y
' ' : . ~ . _ i ' . . . ' ' . . . . . ' . _ . . . ~ .
r ~:w~-r b :.zy+ ~ ~r ~ x.~ b 45.7{'a\"ifir : Y j~ - .py ~ •
.
r n
e
_ ~ G'~ ~1 1,". i(e ^ , "4 .r%an• s~'1eKnG'aw~4-'?fiS~6w~Q~.~.'.~~ .l~1~
, n. , r :y~..,.~~ , ~ .'~i.:.R . .8_+-~r•~.Y'¢~e. R~...
. ~r g . .
h
- ~YlQ1c~'~~Ft~s~? ~~1~ ~ •}3r~ 3
~a
~
~ r t • I s ~~~s ~ ~
~ y~~^; ' ~z • . - ~
~
5
a . s~'`~.`~~'
" a~~, " {.s, 'r~ ~ ~ 1
. ,
~
, _ - a, , , , _ • r
. ~ ~
~ r -s c.:.i+. r < . e
,
~ , ~ . . . ~
~.y
,
, . '
.
.
. . Ah. . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . 'Y^
.i. . , r . . , . ! , . . ,
~ I~„ y 4 ~ ~ ~ 1x4 ~a,': a-7 t ~i~ 0. ~ ' a
?"~j'" ' x ~ . A ^L~' Jy~I~E "kxS~h 1 Y .
- - "z b 2
~
L._.r.._a..d...,,.~~ ~.s_~, -~a........__~~....u:._.4_~,...:~....~..~..,a.ya~......:~.._..~,...:~.:..v.:`_r~~._~_ - ~ ~Y~..:.S~u:.i:i......___....._.:,..,c,_...__u _,...,w
77
. . .
'tl
~
.Ip +~t 4
C7 ~ ~yr' v~
~
a
~
~
L ~ t d ~
Q ifi1- r ~ n 5 "~hilP~ i
. ~ _
~
u?
~ k k b~~ 4 ?4~ ~ ~
, , , , . . . . :
Fr;
.
µ ~ .,~bM Fe.
. . y
kx
Vt .
' ~ fe
_ . _
,
a. ,
. ,I . . . . . , : _
~
~ . . . ~ .
. . ' ~ . . :.c - . . .
. ,
;
• . . . , -
..~......al:.:...~_....~z.l.,i"`.:--,z_.,.~..«.,.-..aua.,.,.~s-~...,...~w.._.,._.,.,;..nr.a~...x,,.s.:.....w.a~W.~.. ...,w...,..,.._...,-...~...-~:.o~w,~~'..._.,~:a. -
. ~
~
.
~
i
.~.x
S . ~a
k>
t -
. . , - . •
~$:.c . ,C~;•.' '~"'S ~ a ~ - , c .6 . ~ ~ . a-.
, , r'.. ,E ,~.a
. . . . ~ ~ . - . . ~ . . ~a.~_~.
. , . . ~ . . :r.
. . . . . . . i~ v, 5'. .
7
. -
.
.
a ^ S . 'c 4 ,~af z e J~..e;- R .~a :`Y~ 2 x'~+x++x ~F - _ dK . ~p 1 ~,~~y~ r.-.. ,r,`~~.'t`.n' ~..~J ~i~'+`~.
ryV,`
a ~ -d~"°~,d~~ l~~ ~~'-'~t-~•~~.
~ (d~ b :-~e ~ i 'y~j ~ ~3,.'uo
cli a~ ._i c~ a' 4 r~ 9
x ~
C4
f" 43,~~ : ,a, `~o •t
r
77
. . . . . . M
. . a t~. .
~..t~ - . . .
5'.. ~ . . .
. . . ~ ri . . . .
. ' . ~ . . . . . . ~ .
w- .r:. ~ ~ . . . . . _ . .
q~3 4,
. . ~ ~ . ~
~ . . _ . , . . . . .
. . . . . . ' . . . . a,r$y,'t~'t R ' . . . '
~
, . , . ~
.
.
, N . . .
. . . _ < . ~.u.F . ~
. . . . . ~ . .
~
+ m r
. . , ' ~
. . ~ . . ~ ,
. . , . .rt . ~ . , . . ~o
. . ~ , . ~ . . . . y ...,-.'11
. ~ . . . ~ . , -
. ,
• ' . ~ ~
r,
r
. y
. . . ~ , , ~ „ . . , , ..tid
. . ~ ~ .~~y:
>
. , .
,
,r+.' z,''+ _ • .a` a ~ - _ r
,
, . '
~
iT~`~
}
, . . . ~fti . . . ~
.
, . . , . .
. .
~
-.-.....~.:..a.~....., . . .
. , . .
. . . . .
~ s
. .
~ . . . . . . . .
. .:r o . . .
. . , " . ~
; .
.
.
i
<
,
I to~g~,~t~'~~~++.:a~'~
- . . . . . . .
~
. . . . . . . .
, .
~Y
~ .
. .y. .
. . ~ . " ~ . . . _
- _ . . . , i
M
CL
a ~ g >
.
~ . $ fi : .<u.~~ . ; A ~
w^ ~ "
d 41~,W~, 5 y,1iYt arW.,
~ y r
~
'i
- f,
. ~ ~ ~a .
~ . : . . . . , i-: ` . ' .
~i . ~ . • , ^.Y
.~i:~ ~ .r . .
. . . ~ ~ y • ,
l F
~ y.
. . , . . . . ~
i . . , ~r. .
r'.4~ ~ •
i, . ~ _ . . i .
, . . . . _ . .
La
~ A
. , . , . y4p£^, 4 _ t.. .
~ . Y ~ . . . . . .
1
.n
} l . + 1
. . . . , , ,
. .o- . ~ ,
~ . . ~
~
~
. . . , ~ . "~i
. . . : ~ . , ,
~ . . . . . ~ . N : . i ' r . Z.
ti
~ MEMORANDUM
TO: Planrring and Environmental Commission
FRC?M: Depariment of Gamrriunity Develvpment
DATE: August 12, 2002
SUBJECT: A request for a final review of a final pRat far a majar subdivision; a request for a
final reWiew of a conditianal use permit to allow for a private educational
institutian and development pfan approval to cdnstruct ernployee hrausing; and
setting forth details in regards thereto, laca#ed at the site known as "Mountain
Bell"/arr unplatted piece of property, iocafed at 160 N. Frontage Rd./ta be platted
as Lot 1, Middie Creek Subdivisian.
Applicant: Vail Locai Housing Authority, represented by Odeil Architects
PEanner: Allison Ochs
1. SUMMARY
The applicant, the VaiJ Local Housing Authority, represented by Odell ArchEtects, is
requesting a final review of a development plan ta allaw for the construction of 142
• employee housing units; a canditional use perr€iit to allow fpr the relocatian and
expansion of the Early Learning Cen#er; and a final review of a final plat for a major
subdivis6on on the site knowvn as N1ountain Bell, iacated at 160 N. Fronfage Rd. 1 to be
platted as Middle Creek Subdivision.
The applicant has requested that this applieatian be tabled to the August 26, 2002,
Planning and Environmental Corramission rneeting. This wiil allaw the appiicant to
incorporate the Design Revieuu Baard's comments fram the conceptual review on August
/ 5 2V4L.
I1. DESCRIPTIQN OF THE REQUESTS
The applicant, the Vail Local Hausing Autharity, represented by adell Arch'rtects, is
requesting approval of three applications:
A. A final review of a final plat for a major subdivision to allow for the platting of
Middle Creek Subdivision. The subdivision includes Lat 1(the proposed housing
and Early Learning Genter); Lot 2(the existing Mountain Bell tower site); and
Tract A (remaining open space).
B. A final review of a conditaonal use permit to allaw for a private educational
institution (referred to as the Early Learning Center).
C. A final review of a development plara to allow for the constructian of 142
employee housing units.
~
1~74fN
41W
. J
lll. BACKGROUND ~
The Mountain Bell site was annexed inta the Town of Vail by Ordinance No. Series of
1969. In 1974, as part of an agreement wi#h Vaif Associates, Inc., regarding bus service,
the property was deeded to the Town of Vail. A partion of the site is awned by Qwest
and is the site af the Mauntain Bell tower. ln additian, ABC and Learning Tree schools
are located an the site. The rernainder of the site is currently open space.
On September 24, 2001, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed #he
fallowing requests:
1. A major subdivision, ta allow for the platting of #he site known as Mauntaira Bell.
The subdiWision will be known as "°Micfdle Creek Subdivision," and will consist of
Lot 1(the housEng site, known as Middle Creek Village), Lot 2(the Pdlountain Bell
tower site), and Tract A(the apen space parcel).
2. A Land Use Plaro amendment, to change the land use designation from "Open
Space" to "High Density Residential"of Lot 1, Middle Creek Subdivision.
3. A rezoning, ta rezone Lot 1, Middle Creek Subdvision, from "Natural Area
Preservation Qistrict" to "Hausing Zorre D6str'rct".
The Planning and Environmental Commission appror+ed the major subdivisian reques#,
and forwarded recommenda#ians of appraval to the Town Council for the Land Use Plan
amendment and the rezaning eequest. With Ord9nance No. 29, Series af 2001, Town
Council appraved the rezoning of the site, and with Resolution No. 6, Series of 2001, ~
Tawn Council approved the Land Use Plan arriendment. Both approvals are conditioned
upon the fifing of #he final p[at for Middle Creek Subdivisian, and the appraval of a
development plan for the site.
This application has been before the Planning and Environmental Cammission an
numerous occasions over the past few rnonths to discuss the development plan for
Middle Creek in a work sessian format. The applicant is requesting a final review of the
propased development plan for Middle Creek and the conditional use permlt for the Early
Learning Center.
On March 11, 2002, the Planning and Environmental Commission voted 5-2 (Schafield
and Golden against) to tabfe the request for development plan review and the
conditional use permit for the Early Learning Center at Lot 1, Middle Creek Subdivision.
On April 8, 2002, the Planning and Enviranmental Garnmission and Design Review
Board held a joint worksession to review the propased Middle Creek Housing
Develapment. At this worksession, the Pfanning and Environmental Gommission and
Design Review Board provided speci#ic direction to the appliearat regarding the proposed
design of Middle Creek. The Planning and Environmental Commission and Design
Review Board provided the following summary of their cancerhs:
1. As proposed, the bulk and mass does nat relate to the site, nor is there a
relationship or a hierarchy of buildings on the site. ~
~
2
~ 2. As proposed, the surface parking and amount af asphalt is excessive. The
resolution to this issue will nnt involve a reduction in the parking requirement, nor
will screening the surface parking be acceptabie.
Based upon the Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Baard's
April 8, 2002, comments, reaised conceptual plans were submitted to the Depar#ment af
Gommunity Develapment and additionaP meetings with the Planning and Environmental
Cammission and Design Review Board were scheduied.
Qn ApriE 22, 2002, the Pfanneng and Environmental Commission reviewed cQnceptual
plans fflr the re-designed Middle Greek deveiopment. The Planning and Enviranmental
Commissian's camments iracluded the following;
. 1. Generaily, ths Planning and Enviranmental Commission was supportive of the
change in design.
2. The massing needs ta be broken ciown on the east and west sides o# the
structure.
3. ft was stated th,at that rnore units cQUld be added on the east side of the building
to reduce the mass of the building.
4. There were concems expressed regarding the livability af the project and
ensuring that #he new design would be attractive to fhe public and the residents
af ihe praject.
5. There is a need to ensure that this project reflects the gualory of the community, I
giuen its prime location in town.
~ rJn May 1, 2002, the Design Rewiew Board reviewed conceptual plans far the re-
designed Middle Creek development. The Design Revpew Board's eommen#s included
the following:
1. The underground parking is a pasitive additian, helping greatly to rninimize site
disturbance. ~
2. The praject is taking on a better presence and identity a# its own. '
3. Look more at the A guilciing, specifically with regards ta its height and
relationship to the Frontage Rd.
4. The plaza and eourtyarcf concept is good and wili provide benefits to th+e
residents of the project.
The Design Review Baard again reviewed conceptual plans for Middle Creek at their
June 19, 2002, meeting. In general, the Design ReWiew Baard was supportive of the
design direction the applicant proposed.
On July 8, 2002, the Planning and Environrnental Commission reviewed the plans for
MiddEe Greek in a worksessian format. In general, the P[anning and Environmental
Commission was svpportive af the tlesign direction the applicant proposed.
Qn August 7, 2002, the aesign Review Board canceptually reviewed the submittal for
Midd[e Creek. The Design Review Baard's camments focused on two major issues.
1. The east elevation needs additianaf consideratian. Cansider stepping it dawn, so ~
~ that there are some one- ar tuwa- story elements on the east.
2. Building A and BUilding B appear to be two different architectural styles.
Consider making these two buildings more consistent in design.
3
i -
~
IV. RQLES OF THE REVIEWING BQDIES
A. Development Plan in the Housing Zane District
Order af Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the Planning
and Environmental Commission fQr impacts of uselderre9Qpment and then by #he
Design Review Board for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning,
aRd with the Town's aesign Guidelines.
Planninq and Enviranmental Gommission:
Action: The Planning and Environmental Cammission is respansible for final
apprar+al/denial of a development plan in the Hausing zone district. The Planning
and Environmental Commission is responsible for prescribing the following
development standards:
1. Setbacks,
2. Site Coverage,
3. Landscaping and Site Develapment,
4. Parking and Loading,
5. Lat area and site dimensions,
6. Building height,
7. Der+sity control (including gross res'rdentia6 floar area).
In addition, the Planning and Enviranmental Gommission is respansible for ~
reviewing the applicatian for compliance with the foflowing:
1, Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing
and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properCies and the
surrounding neighborhood.
2. Buildings, improvernents, uses and activities are cfesigned and located #o
produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the
surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole.
3. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are
designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site,
maximize opportunities for access and use by the puhlic, provide
adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surraunding
properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space
and rscreation areas.
4. A pedestrian and vehicuaar circulation sys#em designed to provide safe,
efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and thraughaut
the develapment.
5. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in
the praject's envtronmenta] impact repQrt, if not waived, and all neesssary
mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed ~
develapment plan.
4
~ 6. Compfiance with the Vail Comprehensiwe Plan and other applicable
plans.
Desiqn Review Board:
Action: The Design Review Board has no review authority an a deveCopment qlan
in the Housing zone district, but must review any accompanying Design Review
Board application. The Design Review Board 'as responsibfe for evaluating the
praposal for:
1. Architectural compatibility with o#her structures, the land and
surroundings,
2. Fitting buildings into landscape,
3. Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the
topography,
4. RemavallPreservation of trees and native vegetation,
5. Adequate provision for snaw starage on-site,
6. Acceptability ot building materials and colors,
7. Acceptability af roof eCements, eaves, oWerhangs, and other building
forms,
8. Provision of Candscape and drainage,
9. Prouision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures,
10. Circulation and access #o a site including parking, and si#e distances,
11. Location and design of sate[lite dishes,
12, Provisian of outdaor lighting,
~ 13. The design of parks.
S#aifi:
The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided
and plans canform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The
staff also advises the appCicant as to campiiance with the design guidelines.
Staff provides a staff inemo containing backgrflund on the property and pravicEes
a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings,
and a recornmendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff
also facilitates the rewiew process.
Town Counci1:
Actions o# Design Review Board or Pianning and Enviranmental Commission
may6e appealed to the Town Council or by the Town CounciL Town Council
evaluates whether or not the Planning and Environmental Gammissian or Design
Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with
modifacations, or overturn the board's decision.
B. Conditional Use Permit
Plannina and Environmental Gommission:
The Planning and Enviranmental Camrnission is responsible for approwal/deniaf
of a conditionaf use permit. The Paannong and Enviranmental Commissian is !
responsible for evalua#ing a proposal for:
~ 1. Relatianship and impact af the use on devefapment abjectives of the Town.
. ~
2. Effect of the Use on Iight and air, distributian of papulation, iransportation ~
facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public
fiacilities and public facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, witla particular reference to congestion, automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuuerability, and removal of snow from the streets and parkir,g areas.
4. Effect upan the character af the area in which the proposed use is to be
lacated, including the scale and bulk af the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
5. Such +other factvrs arrd criteria as the Commission deems applicabGe ta the
proposed use.
6. The environmental impact repar# concerning the praposed use, if an
environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of the Town Code.
7. Conformance wGth development standards o# zone distric#
Desiqn Review Board;
The Design Review Bvard has no reuiew authority on a Conditional Use Permit, ~
but must review any accompanying Design Review Board application. ;
C. Major Subsiivision ~
I
Rlanninq and Environmental Commission: '
Actinn: The Planning and Envirflnmental Commission is responsible for final
approval/denial of a major subdivision. The Planning and Envirnnmental Commission shall review the proposaf and ~
make a recommendation to the Town Council on the compatibiEity of the
subdivESian with surrounding uses, cansistency with the Uaii Comprehensive
Plans, and impact on the general welfare af the community.
Desi n Review Board:
Actian: 7he Design Review Board has no review authQrity on majar subdivisions.
Staff:
fihe staff is respansibfe for ensuring that all subrnittal requirements are pravided.
The sta#f advises the applicant as 3o compfiance witn the Zoning and Subc[ivision
Ftegulatians.
Staff provides a staff memo corttaining background on the property and provides
a staff evalvatiorr of the project with respect tfl the requirecE criteria and findings,
and a recammendataon on approval, approvaC with conditions, or denial. Staff
also faci9itates the rev9ew process.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS !
i
Town of Vail Zonin Re u!a#ions Title 12 Vail Town Code ;
~
Ordinance No. 29, Series of 2001, appraved the rezoning of this site from Natural Area ;
Preservatian Oistrict to Housing zone district. Pursuant ta Section 12-61-1, Vail Town ~ o
Code, the purpose of the Housing zone dis4rict is as follows:
~
i
6
~ The Hausirag flistrfct is intended to provr'de adequate sffes for employee housing
which, 6ecause of the nature and characteristics of employee housing, carlno# be
adequately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other
residential zonrng drsfricts. It is raecessary in this dfsfrict to provide development
standards specrfically prescribed for each development prcrposaf or projecf fo j
aeht`eve the purpases prescribed in Sectian 12-1-2 of thrs Tifle and to provide far ~
the pubk'c welfare. Certain nonresidential uses are allowed as conditional uses, '
which are intended to be incidental and secondary fo the residential uses vf the Disfrict. The Housing Distrrct is intended to ensure fhaf employee housing I
permitted ln the District is appropriately Pocafed and designed to meet the needs "
of residerats of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and to ensure adequate
light, air, open spaces, and Qfher amenities apprapriate to the aflowed types Qf
uses.
Section 12-61-3, Vail Town Cacie, identifies "public and private schools and educationa9
intuitions, including daycare facilities" as a canditional use in the Hausing zone district.
For the Planning and Environmental Cammission's refererrce, Section 12-16-1, Vail
Town Code, identifaes the purpose fQr a eonditiona9 use permit as follows:
!n order to prov;de the flextbillry necessary to achieve the nbjectrves of thrs tirle,
specrfied uses are permitted in certain dlstricfs subject fo the granting of a
corrdifional use permif. Because of their unusual or special characferr`stics,
~i candr[ional uses requfre review arrd evaluation so fhat they may be lacated
praperly with respect tQ the purposes of fhis fitle and wlth respecf ta their effects
~ on surrounding properties. The reYiew pracess prescribed in this chapter is
intended to assure cornpatibrlity and harmonious development between
corrditioRaf uses arrd surrounding properties and the town at Iarge. Uses Irsted as
conditianal uses in the various districfs may be permifted su[ajeet to such
conditions and limitatians as the tawrr rnay preseribe to ensure that the Iocatian
and aperafion of the cor,ditional use$ will be in accordance with development
objectives of the town and will nat be deirimental to other uses or prvperties.
!Where eonditions cannot be deuised to achieue fhese objectives, applications for
conditional use permits shall be denied. '
Town af Vail Subdivisian Requlatians (Title 13. Vail Town Cade)
Pursuant to Section 13-1-2, Vail Tawn Cade, the purpose of the subdivision regulations
is as follows:
A. Statufory Authorify: The subdivision regulations contained In this Title
have been prepared and enacfed in accordance with Colorado Revrsed
Statutes title 39, arficle 23, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety
and vvelfare of the present and future inhabitants of the 7own.
B. Goals: To fhese errds, fhese regulativns are intended fo ,prafecf the
envlronment, to ensure efficient circulatlon, adequare improvemenis,
suf#icfent operr space arrd fn general, fo assist the orderly, efficient and
integrated developmenf of the Town. These regulations aIsa provide for
the proper arrangemerrt of streets and ensure prpper distributian af
~ populatron. The regulations also coordinate the need for public services
vvith governmental improvement pragrarns. Standards far desr'gn and
eonstruction Qf improvements are hereby set forth to ensure adequate
7
~
i
I
and cnnvenient traffic circulatron, utilities, emergency access, drainage, ~ I
recreatian and light and air. Afso intended is the im,provement af land
records and surveys, plans and pdats and to safeguard the interesfs af the
publac and subdivider and provide consumer protectiorr for the purchaser;
and to regulate other matters as the Tawn Planning arrd Environrnentai
Gonrrmrssion and Town Courrcil rnay deem necessary irr order fo profecr
the besf interesfs Qf the public.
C. Speciffc Purposes: These regulatiorrs are further intended to serve the
following speclfic purposes:
1. To fntorm each subdrvrder of the starrdards and crrferla by whr'ch develaprrlent proposals wiJl be evaluated, and to provide information
as fo the type and extent of improvements required.
2. To provr'de for the strbdrvrsiori of property rn the fuiure- wlthoui corrfllct
with development on adjacerrt land..
3. To protect and conserve the value of land fhroughout the Municipalify
and the value of buiEdrngs and improvemerrfs an the land.
4. To ensure that subdivisiorr of property rs in compfiance with the Towrr's
zoning ordinances6, to achieve a harmonious, convenie,nt, wQrka6le
relationshrp arraorrg Iand uses, cQnsistent with Tawn develapmerrt
abjectives. !
5. To guide public and private policy arrd actron in order to pravide ~
adequafe and efficient transparfation, water, sewage, schoofs, parks, ;
playgrounds, recreafion, and other publr'c requiremerrfs and facilities i
and genera!!y ro provide that pu6lic facilities will have sufficient ~
capacr`ty to serve the proposed subdivision. ~
6. To provide for accurate legal descriptions of newly subdivided land and
to esta6lrsh reasonable and desr'rable consfructian design sfandards
and pracedures.
7. To prevent the pollufion of air, streams and ponds, to assure adequacy
of drainage facilities, to safeguard the wafer fable and to errcourage ;
the wrse use and management of natural resources thrvughQUt the
°
Tawn rrt order tv preserve the integrity, stabrJlty and beauty of the
communlty and the vaJue of the land.
Town of Vail Land Use Plar+
The land use designation, according ta the Town of Vail Land Use F'lan, #or this site is
High Density Residential. The High Density Residential designation is described as
follaws:
The hausing in this cafegory would fypically consisr af multi-floared structures
with derrsities exceedirrg 15 dwellrng units per buildable acre. C7ther activities in ,
this category would include prrvate recreational facillties, and prtvate parking ;
facilities and r'nsritutiona! / public uses such as churches, fire s#ations and parks
and open space facilitles.
The Town of Vaif Land Use Plan describes the Mountain BeII site as Tract 35 and states;
The Mountain Befl micrawave faciiity arrd IwQ day care centers are located on a
25 acre site owned by the Town of Vaif which is north of 1-70. A portron of this ~
site under the mrcrowave facilify is owned by Mountain Bell. Parf crf the eratrre
srte in locafed in an area of inedium, environmental hazards arrd shoulci continue
~
I
8
~ to remain in its presettt use, wifh ,possi6le expansiQns Qf ihe day car centers. ft
may also be arr aption for the cemefery, further dlscussed later.
The Vail Land Use Plan includes the following goal statements which staff cansiders to
be applicable to this request: i
i
~
1.0 General Growth/Develapment ;
7.1 Vail shvuld confinUe to grr w in a contro!!ed errvironment, maintaining a
balance between residentfal, commercral and recreatranal uses to serve
bofh fhe visrtor and the permanenf residerrt.
1.2 The quafity af the errvlronment including air, tivater and Qther raatural
resources should 6e protected as the Town grows.
1.3 The quality of development should 6e maintained and upgraded
whenever,possi6le.
7.6 Deueloprnent prapasals on the hillsides shvuld be evaluated on a case by
ease 6asis. Limifed develop,ment may be permitted for some !nw intensity
uses in areas that are not highly visr6le from fhe Valley floor. 111ew
profects should 6e carefully corrfrolled and develQped wifh sensifivity to
the environment.
~ 1.12 Vail shauId accommodate mosf of the additional growth in exrsting
develaped areas (infrll areas).
5.0 ResrdentiaJ
5.1 Addifionaf residentraJ growth should continue to occur,orlmarily in existing,
platted areas and as appropriate 1n new areas where high hazards do nvt
exrst.
5.3 Affardable empfoyee hQUSing should be rnade avallable th,rough private
efforts, assisted by limited incenfrves, prQVided by the Tvwn of Vail with
appropriate restrlctions.
5.4 Residentlal growth should keep pace with the marketplace demands for a
full range of hausirag types.
5.5 The exisfin,g employee housing base should 6e preserved and upgraded.
Additfonal employee housing needs should be aecommadafed af varied
sifes throughout the community.
Town of Vail Cam rehensive Q en Lands Plan
The Camprehensive Open Lands f'aan recommends the fnllawing the Mountain Bell
Site:
~ APprvxr"mafely half of the property is intended for affordable housing and the
remainder of the site will remain open space.
~
9
The Coanprehensive Open Lands Plan is in#ended to iden#ify artd recommend actians for ~
the pre?tection of sensitive land and open space, not as a guEde for developmerot of other
properties.
VI. SITE ANALYSIS
Zoning: Hausing
Land Use Plan Designatian: High Density Residential
Current Land Use: Open Space, Private Educational Institution
Lot Area: 6.673 acres 1290,676 sq. ft.
Buiidable Area: 4.573 ac. ! 199,200 sq. ft.
Hazards: Moderate Debris Flow, NVedium Severity Rockfall, Slopes
in exeess of 40°>a
A cornplete site anafysis is atiached for reference.
VII. SURR4UNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Zaninp
North: USFS land NA
Sauth: GDOT right-of-way NA
East: Open Space Natural Area Preserva#ion Disfrict (NAPb)
Vllest: Residential High Density Multiple Family (HDMF)
Upen Space Natural area Preservation District (NAPD)
VIIL DISCUSSION 1SSUES ~
!n March of 2001, the Tawn Council adapted C)rdinance No. 3, Series of 2001, which
adopted the Housing zone district. Then, through grdinance Na. 29, Series of 2001, the
Town Council rezoned Lot i, Middle Creek from Nafiural Area Preservation District to the
Housing zone district. Much like a 5pec9al aevelopment District or the General Use
zone district, the Wousing zane district requires the Planning and Environmentaf
Commiss9on ta prescribe development standards, including lot size, density, gr4ss
residential flc+or area, height, etc. A site analysis has been attached fior reference. The
following issues have been identifaed by the staff:
The Middle Greek site is zoned Housing zane district. The Hausing zone district was
adopted by the Town of Vail in 2001. fts purpose is as follows:
The Nousing L}istrict is lntended to provide adequafe sites for employee housing
which, because af fhe rrature and characteristics of employee hnusrng, cannot be
adequately regUlafed 6y the develapment srana'ards prescrrbed for ather
residential zoning disrricfs. ft is necessary in thls district to provide development i
standards specifically prescribed for each developrnent proposal or project fo
achieve the purposes prescribed in Secfion 12=1-2 of th1's Title and fo provt'de for
fhe public we/fare. Certain norrresidential uses are a!lowed as candirional uses,
which are infended to be rncidental and secondary fn the residential uses af the
Drsfrict. The Nausing Qlstricf r`s intended to ensure fhat emplayee housing
permrtted in the aistrict is approprrately Jacated and designed to meef the needs ~
of resr`dents Df Vail, to harmoraize with surrQUndrng uses, and to ensure adequate
Irght, air, open spaces, and other amenities apprapriate to the allowed types of
uses.
I
10
# A. Density
The applicant is currently proposing 142 dwelling units. The proposal includes
44 studio units, 29 one-bedroom units, 24 two-bedroom units, and 45 three-
bedroam units. According to the Tawn of Vail Land Use Plan, the land use
designation far this site is "High Density ResidentiaP" which is defined as:
The housing in thls category would typically canslst of multf-floored
str'uctures with densities exceeding 15 dwe!ling ur+its per buildable acre.
Qther acflvities fn this cafegory would inclUde private recreationaJ
facilitres, and private parking facilities arrd rnstitutianal/pubfic use$ such as
churches, frre sta#ions, and parks and apen space facrlitles.
The current density of Middle Creek is 21.3 dwelling units per acre or 31 dwelling
units per buildable acre, This is a praposed total ofi 256 beds on the site. In the
Housing zone district, #he Planning and Environmental Gommissian prescribes
' allowable density. Staff rbas provided density comparisans of o#her employee
housing projects in the Town of Vail:
Development Zonincl Number of Units
Timber Ridge SDD 19$
Pitkin Creek SDD 156
Vail Commons CC3 71
~ Rovers Edge not in TOV 101
The Tarnes not in TOV 130
Timber Ridge, located at Timber Ridge Vrllage, 1280 N. Frantage Rd. West f Lots
C-1 fhrough C-5, Lion's Ridge 1=rling No. 1:
In 1979 the Torrrn rezoned Lots G-3 thraugh C-5 from Residentia{ Clus#er zone
district to Special Development District No. 10. Timber Ridge was developed as
a rental empioyee hnusing project arrd receiued deuiations from the design
guidelines and density requirements. The density far the site is 19,6 dwelling
units per acre.
Zoning: SDD Na. 10 (no vnderlying zoning)
LL1D: High Density Residential
Lot 5ize: 10.08 acres / 439,084.8 sq. ff
Uni#s: 198 dwelfing units
Density: 19.6 dulacre
Pitkirr Creek Park, locafed at 3971 Bighom Rd. / Prtkrn Creek Park:
Spec4al Development District No. 3, Pitkin Creek Park, was adopted in 1974. Tne
underlying zoning is Medium Density Multipfe Family zone district. Pitkin Creek
Park was developed as an affordable housing project, with commercial elements,
and recei+red de+riattons ta the design guideiines and density requiremsnts. The
affardability provisions expired after 7 years, and the units are now sold at market
rate.
. Zoning: SQD No. 3, underlying MDMF
Lot S9ze: 8.29 acres / 361,112 sq. fit.
LUD: Medium Density Res+dential
11
Units: 156 dwelling units ~
Derasity: 18.8 dulacre
Vail Commons, located at 2109 N. Frontage Rd. West/ Vafl Cvmmons;
Vai[ Commons was develaped under Commercial Core 3 zoning and was
approved in 1995. It is a mixed-use project, with majar commercial uses and.
deed-restricted employee housing including 53 far-sale units and 18 rentaf units.
Zoning: CG3
Lot Size: 6.5E8 acres 128G,Q82 SF
LUD. Community Commercial
Units: 71 dwelling units
Density: 10.8 dulacre
B. Parking
Pursuant to Section 12-61-$, Vail Town Cade, development within the Housing
zone district, the parking requirements are as outlined in Chapter 12-10, Vail
Town Code. Hawever, the Housing zone disfrict does allow far a reductian in the
number of required parking spaces, subject to Planning and Environmental
Commission rewiew and approval of a parking managerreent plan. Section 12-61-
8: Parking and Loadrng, Vaii Tawn Cade, states:
Off-sPreet parking shall be provided fn accordance with Chapter 10 of this
Title. IVo parking or loadirrg area shaN be locafed withln any required serback
area. At the discrerion af the Planning and Environmental Cammfsslvn,
variations to the parkJng standards outlined in Chapter 10 rnay be approved 'i
during the review af a developrnent plan subject to a Parkrng Managemetaf
Plan. The Parking Management Plan shal! 6e appraved by the Planning and
Envirnnmenta! Commission and shall provlde for a reductiora in the parking
requirements based on a demonstrated need for fewer parking spaces fharr
Chapfer 10 of thfs title woufd require. For exarrrple, a demansfrated need for
a reduction in the reqUired parking cauld include:
A. Proxirnity or availabrfrty of alternative mades of transportation
including, 6ut not limited to, pu6lic transit or shuttle services.
B. A limitatiQn placed in the cleed restrrcrions limrtrng the num6er af
cars far each unit.
C. A cfemorrsfrated permanent program irrcludlrrg, bui not limited to,
rideshare programs, carshare programs, shuttle senrice, or
staggered work shiffs.
The allocatic?n of parEcing spaces is based on dwelfing unit size. Chapter 12-10,
Vail Tawn Gode, requires 1.5 parking spaces for units less than 500 sq. ft.; 2
pa.rkEng spaces for units 500 to 2000 sq. ft.; and 2,5 parking spaces for units over
2000 sq. ft. As proposed, the parking requirement wouid be as fallows:
Number and Type of Unit Parkinq ratia_ Totad_Spaces •
44 studia units 7.5 - - 66
29 one-bedraorn units 1.5 43.5
24 two-bedroam units 2 48
12
~ 45 three-bedroom units 2 90
Tatal 248
The applicant is proposing 270 parking spaces fQr the entire development site.
The applicant is proposfng 248 parkirag spaces for the proposed housfrag,
meeting the parking requiremertt, as prescribed by Chapter 12-10, Vail Town
Code. The remaining 22 spaces are for the Early Learning Center.
Houuever, a deviation ta the parking requirement is required for the size of the
parking spaces. As currently praposed, the parking spaces are canfigured as
follows:
138 tandem spaces (51
132 single spaces (49°1O)
77 compact spaces (29%) 25% is allowed by tlae Tawn Code
193 full-size spaces (71
211 cavered spaces (78%)
59 surface spaces (22%)
Previously, the applicant praposed ta enclose 59°!o of the proposed parking.
I With this current submittal, the appiicant is prapasing to enclose 7$% of the
parking. Staff believes that this is an appropriate percentage of enclosed parking
for this site. The remaining surface parking must be screeneci with site walls,
~ berms, or landscaping.
The applicant has provided a parking management plan which is attached for
reference. Should the Planning and Environmental Cornmission choose to
approve the proposed deveEopment plan, this parking management plan shall be
included as park of the approvaE.
C. Setbacks
Section 12-61-5, Vail TQUVn Code, describes the setbac{c requiremenfs in the
Housing zane district:
T1te sefbacks irr this dlsrrict shall be 20' fram the ,perimeter of fhe zane
district. At the discretron of the Plannrng and Errvfronrnental Gornmission,
variations to the setback standards may be appraved duriRg the review of a
development plan subject to the appllcant demonstratirtg compllance with fhe
followtng criteria:
A. Proposed building setbacks provide necessary separafion betweerr
buifdings and ri,narian areas, geologically serrsitive areas and other
environmerttally sertsltive areas.
B. Praposed buifding setbacks will provide adequate avaflabifity of light, air
arrd open space.
C. Prapased buildirrg sstbacks will provide a campatible relationship with
buildings and uses on adjacent properties.
~ D. Prcaposed buirding setbacks wifl result in creative design soluttons or other
public benefits tha[ could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with
,prescrrbed setbaek standards.
13
Variatrons to the 20 ft. setback shall no[be allowea' on property lines adJacerrt ~
to HR, SFR, R, PS, and RG zoned prQperties, unless a varfance is approved
by the PlaRning ana' Environmental Gommrssian pursuant to Chapter 17 of
thls Tftle.
The applicant is proposing the following se#backs:
Front -18 ft. (at ELC)
Side - 27 ft.
Side - 20 ft.
Rear -60 ft. or 4 ft. fdr parking
As further discussed in Section VII of this memorandum, staff beFieves that
deviations tQ the 20 ft. setback are appropriate an this site. However, staff also
believes that there must be adequate areas for landscaping to buffer buildings
and uses from the I-70 corrador. Staff recommends that a landscaping and sound
berm be included in the landscaping plan for the Early Learning Center.
E7C. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR A DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE H ZOhIE DISTRICT
The fallowing criteria shaCl be used as the principal means for erraluating a proposed ~
development plan. lt shal{ be the burden af the applicant to demonstrate tnat the
propased development plan complEes with all applicable design criteria:
A. Building clesign with respect to architecture, charac#er, scale, massing and ~
urientation is compatible with the site, adjacent proper#ies and the
surrounding neighbarhood.
Adjacent uses to the project include the fallowing:
• Solar Vail - a multiple-family housing project currently zaned High Density
Multiple Family.
• Trac# C, Vail Potato Patch - an open space iract currentiy zoned Natural Area
Preservation aistrict. '
• Parcel B, Spracfdle Creek Ranch - an open space tract currently zorred Natural
Area Preservation District. This property is adjacent #o Lot 1.
• I-70 Right-of-lNay - land owned by CDQT but located within Town af Vail
boundaries. ps a road righ#-ofi-way, there is no zoning on the property. This
praperly is adjacent ta Lot 1.
• White River Nationaf Forest fand pwned by the United States Forest Senrice
outside of the Town of Vail boundary.
While the site 9acks many direct neighbors, this site is of extreme impor#ance as it is
visable from the main entrance into the Town of Vail. The siting af buildings and
improvements must be responsive to the existing tapography of the site. The Qesign
Review Board and the Planning and Environmental Comrnission have encauraged
the applicant to cluster the development on the site, thus preserving some of the
natural features and topagraphy of the site. Staff believes tha# the applicant has
proposed a design whieh is rrtore responsive to this request than the previous ~
proposal. Many of the large trees at the entrance to the site have been preserWed.
Enclosed parking has been €ncreased tram 59% to 78%.
14
~ in the previflus prQposal, buildings vaere loeated as close as 8 ft. ta the property line.
The nousing development has maintained a 20 ft. setback for all structures. The
Early Learning Center has a frant setback of 18 ft. Staff believes that the praposed
setbacks meet the intent of the Housing zvne district. According to SectiQn 12-61-5:
Setbacks:
The se[backs irr thfs distrr'ct shall be 20` from the perimeter of the zone district At
the discretipn of the Pfannr'ng and Environmenta! Camrrrrss+on; variafions to the
setback standards may be approved during the review of a developmenf plarr
subject to the applicant demQnstrafrrrg compliance wrth fhe fallowing criteria:
F. Propased burlding setbacks provide necessary separation between
buildings and riparian areas, geologically serrsitive areas and other
environmentaJly sensitrve areas. ~
F. Proposed building set,backs will pravide adcquafe availability of light,
air and apen space.
G. Propased building setbacks wilfprovide a corrrpatible relationship with
bu1ldrngs and crses on adjacent properties.
N. Propased building setbacks wr'lf result in creatrve desr'gn solutrarrs vr
ofher pu6lic benefits that could not otherwise be achr'eved by
confQrmance with prescrrbed setback standards.
Staff believes that additianal consideration must be given to the massirrg of the ,
prapased buildings ern the site. As proposed, Building C has a rrsaximum height of
81.5 ft. Staff befieves #hat the massing of the proposed design mus# be compatible
~ with the si#e, adjacent properties, and the surrounding neighborhoad. Because this
site is surrounded by undeveloped sites, any structure will be highly visible at #his
focation. The Des'rgn Review Board is particularly concerned aboUt the massing of
Building C an the east elevatian and encauraged the applicant to consider stepping
the building down to a one- or twa- story efevation on the east side.
The character of the proposed building must also be carrrpatible with the site,
adjacent properties, and the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant has been to
the Design Review Board numeraus times to discuss architectural character. The
Design Review Baard requested that the applicant maintain the architectural
character vvhich has been proposed in alf design elements o# the buildings.
~ Particularly, the Design Revievtir Board expressed concem abaut the use of hardi-
board instead of stucco on the visible facades of the buildings.
B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to
produce a functianal deveEopment plan respansive to the site, the surround'ang
neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole.
5taff believes that the propased uses and activities have been located to praduce a
functional development plan, responsive to the site, the surrounding neighboncood
and uses, and the community as a whole. Specifically, the separation of the Early
Learning Center and the housirag is a positive element of the current propasaf.
Previausly, parkirrg #or the haUSing was located adjacent to the parking for the Early
f.earning Center. Staff belieWes #nat separation of these uses provides for a mare
~ functianal development plan. ln addition, the applicant has designed a turn-around
area for the Early Learning Center, and 22 parking spaces, which staff belieues will
allow for the additional stacking of vehicles at peak traffic times. Staft b€;iieves that
15
additianal consideration must be given to the fire truck staging area. Specifically, ~
staff believes that fire fruck staging should be accommodated by widening the
southern portian Qf the turnarDUnd to meet staging requirements. This wiil reduce
the arnount of paving required at the Early Learning Center and wilf pravide for
additional landscaping appartunities.
C. Open space and Iandscaping are bath functional anci aesthetic, are designed
to preserwe and enhance the natural features af the site, maximize
opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering
between the prapased uses and surraunding praperties, and when possible,
are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas.
The proposed limits af disturbance far the uvest portion of the property keeps
deveIQpment out of the riparian corridor and protects the existang Middle Creek. Staff
believes tha# this is a benefit of the development. ]n addition, more trees at the
entrance to the deveEopment are retained than were retained by the previous
proposal. The setbacks for the housirag have been maintained at 20 ft., allowing for
additional landscaping and berming to screen the uses than the previous design
allowed.
A recreation area of approximateiy 4,250 sq. ft. has been praposed. This recreation
area is adjacent to Building C and has greater exposure to the sun than the previous
recreation area prvposal.
Staff believES that this criterion has been met. ~
D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe,
efficient and aesthetically pieasing circufatian to #he site and throughout the
development.
This site, due to its topography, is a difficult site to access. Staff believes that the
vehicular circulation #hrough the site has been designed to be as efficient as possible
and meet the Town's regulatiQns regarding access. The applicant has provided
adequa#e snow starage, meeting the Town's regulations which require an area
equaling 30% of the paved area far snow storage. The access drive to the site is a
private drive, and wi!l be maintained by the applicant. ~
Additional information is required regarding exterior site ligh#ing, which staff belieWes
is an important aspect of pedestrian circulation and that must meet the
recamrnencEation of the Environmental Impact Repark. However, staff believes #hts
issue should be considered at the t}esign Review Board.
The integration of a bus stop inta the d'evelopment rs a positive improvement to the
development of the site. The bus is able to enter the site entirely, no# blocking traffic
on the Frontage Raad, and exit the site in both direciians. Staff beRieves the
applicant has met the concerns of the Planning and EnvironmentaP Cornmission and ~
staff concerning bus traffic.
The applicant has indicated a 10 ft. pedestrian and bike path along the Frontage
Road from the west property Bine, extending to the existing sidewalk at the ~
roundabaut. In adcfition, the applicant is proposing an informal path fram the east
16
~ side af the housing to the path along Frontage Road. Staff befieves that this
connection will meet the needs for pedestrian and bike circulatiorr for the site.
E. Environmental impacts resuiting from the praposal have been iden#ified in the ~
praject's environrnental irnpaet repQrt, if not waived, and all necessary
matigating measures are implemented as a par't of the proposed development
plan.
The Environmentaf Impact Report has been incEuded far reference. Staff beliewes
that by limiting development to the eas# side of Middle Creek, the praject has limited
its impact on Middle Creek. In addit4on, the develapment has not encroached onto
the area of 40% slapes, loca#ed an the northern partion af the site. There are some
areas of 40% SIOpeS which were created during the original construction of the
access raad and the ABC and Learning Tree schools. As these are not the existing
grades of the site, staff does not believe this to be an issue.
According to the Tawn of Vail hazard maps, Middle Creek Subdivision 'ts locaied
within a Medium Severi#y Rockfall hazard and Moderate Hazard Debris Flow. A si#e-
specific study has been compPeted by R.J. drish, dated August 16, 2001, and is
attached for reference. The consultcng engineering geologist acknawlEdges that the
risk of debris flaw from the Middle Creek Valley to be high cfuring the lifietime of the
project, with a volume described as "small to quite large.° The report indicates that
the entire site is located within a high hazard debris fEow area. The report afso
suggests that the risk could be minimized through mitigation measures. The report
~ alsa acknowledges that the risk ot rockfa[I is medium during the lifetime of the
project. Mitigation recammended by the report inclucfes ciislodging exposed baulders
by hand prior ta constructian. ft further states that any aou6ders woufd likely be
trapped in the channel of the creek. The hazard reparts have been included for
reference. Staff believes that the site plan must indicate a limits of disturbance
fence. In additian, the hazarcl rnitigatEan plan also indicates large trees to screen the
berrn, but the landscape plan indicates shrubs and bushes. Staff believes that the
berm must be screened in a similar manner ta the screenirrg requirements for the
Bnothfalls mitigatian berm vvas required to be landscaped.
An EnWiranmental Irnpact Report has been campleted by Stewart Environrreenta!
Consultants, Inc., and has been attached for reference. The repart states that while
the proposed development of Lat 1 will have an impact orr plant and animaE
communities presently inhabiting the property, #he loss of the 6.5 acres daes not
represent a significant irnpact to the local plant and animal communities. The report
recamrraends that all trash dumpsters shalf be mad2 bear-proof and exterior lighting
shall be minimized. Bath of these must be a cnndition of approval. The report
additionally states that the impact to Middle Creek cauld include runoff frpm paved
parking areas. A drainage study has also been included.
F. Campliance with the Vail Comprehensive Ptan and ot'her applicable plans.
The Town of Vail Land Use Plan contains goals which staff considers ta be
applicable to this request. The applicable goals include: ~
~
~ 1.0 Genera! Growth/Aevelopment
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a confralled errvironment,
17
maintaining a balance 6etvveen residentiaJ, cemmercial arrd ~
recreaflonal uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent
resident.
1.2 The qualiiy of the environmenf including air, water and ather
natural resourees shQUld be protected as the Tawn grQws.
1.3 The qualrty vf developmenf should be maintained and upgraded
whenever posstble.
1.6 Developmerrt proposals on the hillsfdes should be evaluated on a
case by case basrs. Limited developmenf may be permitted for ~
some iow Fntensity uses in areas that are nof hrghly visible fronrr 9
fhe Valley floor. New prajects should be carefully controlled and
develaped wifh sensifivrty fa the environment.
1.12 Vail should accornmodate most of the additional growih in existing
developed areas (infrll areas).
5.0 Residen#ial
5.1 Addrtional residential growth shvuld corrtinue ta accur prrmarily in
existing, piafted areas and as appropriate in new areas where
hfgia hazards do not exist.
5.3 Affordable emplayee housing should be rnade availabde fhraugh ~
private etfarts, assisted 6y limifed ineentr`ves, provided 6y fhe
Tpwn of Vail wiih appropriafe restrictions.
5.4 Residentral growth shauld keep pace wJfh the marketplace
dernands for a full range of housirrg types.
5.5 The existing emplnyee housirrg base should be preserved and
upgraded. Addr'tronaf employee houslrrg needs shauld be
accommotJated at varied sites thrau9haut the cammurri fY.
The Comprehensive C?pen Lands Plan identifies the Mountain Bell Site as "appraximately
half of the property is intended for affordable housing and the remarnder of the site will ~
rema;n capen space." The Cornprehensive Upen Lands Plan is intended ta identify and
recammend actions for the protection of sensitive land and open space, not as a guide for
develapment af other properties.
The Tawn of Vail Land Use Plan provides a land use designat`ron for this site as High
Densi#y Residential. The High Density Residential designation is described as fol6ows:
7`he hvusrng in ihis category wauld typiealIy consfst of rnulti-floored structures
' with densities exceeding 15 dwelling units per ,buildabJe acre. Other acfivifies in
fhis categvey would include private recreational facilities, and private parking
facilifies and rnstitutianal/ public uses such as churcfaes, fire stations and parks
and apen space facilities. fo
The Vail Land Use f'lan describes #he Mountain Bell site a$ Tract 35 and states:
18
~ The ?Vlauntain Bell micrawave facrlity and two day eare centers are Incated on a
25 acre site awned .by the Town of Uaif which is narth of 1-70. A portiaR of this
site under the mrcrawave facility is owraed by Mountarn Bell. F'art af the enfire
site in located rn art area af inedium envfronmental haaards arrd should cQnfinue
to remain in its presenr use, wiih possible expansiQns of the day car centers. !t
may also be arr option for the cemetery, further drscussed later.
X. REQUtFCED CRITERIA ANl3 FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
In addition to the request for development plan approval as required by the Hausing
zane district, the applicant is requesting a conditional use perrnit tor the relocation afi tfie
Early Learning Center to the eastern portion of the site. Schools, including day cares,
are a conditional use in the Housing zone district. According to Section 12-16-1, Vail
Tawn Code:
In order to prcrvide fhe flexr6ifity necessary to achieve the objectrves of this title,
specified uses are ,oermitted in certain districfs su6ject to the granting of a
conc!lfionaf use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics,
condrfional uses requrre review and evaluatian so that they may be located
properly wrth respect to the purpvses of this titfe and wrth respect to their effecfs
on surroundrrrg properties. The review pracess prescribed fn this chapfer is
intended to assure campatibility and harmonious devefopment between
cQnditional uses an,d surrounafing prvperfies and the fown at large. Uses listed as
canditional uses in the various districts may be permrtted subfect to such
• cranditions and limitations as the fown may prescribe to ensure that the location
and operation of the ccrnditional uses wi11 be in accardance rvrth develapment
objectives af fhe town arad will not be derrimental to other uses ar properfies.
Where corrdirrorrs canno[ be devtsed to achreve fhese dbjectives, applrcations for
conditional use permits shall be denred,
A. CON5IDERATION OF FACTORS:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the develapment odjective$ of
the 7own.
The Vail Land Use PEan identifies the folCowing goals wi#h regards to
community services:
6.0 Communriy Services
E.1 Services shauld keep ,pace with increased growth.
6.2 The Town of Vail should play a roJe in future development
throc?gh ,balancing growth with services,
6.3 Servlces shoufd be adjustecl to keep pace with the needs
of peak perrods.
~ In adcfition, the Vai6 Land Use P{an states that fihis site is ta be used for
the future expansion af the ABC and Learning Trees Schaals.
19
Staff believes that #his use is imporkant to the 7own of Vail and will have a
positive impact an the Town. These schools provide a valuable service to ~
the members of the cammunity.
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schaols, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public facilities needs.
Staff believes that the reEocation and expansion of the Early Learning
Center on this site is a benefit to the Town. According to the summary
pravided by the applicant, the Early Learning Center will prowide early
learning services for BQ preschool age children, with 12 to 15 full-time
staff inembers, and 2part-time staff inernbers. The Early Leaming
' Center has appraximateiy 4,630 sq. ft. of floQr area, and includes a 4,103
sq. ft. autcioor play area. Staff believes that it is beneficiai tn have this
use located an this site, which is centrally Poca#ed in the Tawn af Vaii.
An important cansideratian in the reWiew of this conditianal use perrroit is
the passibility for future expansian. Due to the amount and location af the
parking, fhe proximity of the buw9ding to rts praperty line, and the amount
and 9aeation o# play area, future expansian possibilities are limited.
3. Effec# upan traffic with particular reference to congestion,
automotive and pedestrian safety? and convenience, traffic flow and
. cantrol, aceess, maneuverability, and r+emoval of snow from the ~
street and parking areas.
The appfican,t has proposed 22 parking spaces far the Early Learning
Center. Parking for uses no# specifically listed in Ghapter 12-1{}, VaiC
Town Cade shall be determined by the Planning and Environmentaf
Gommission. A memo has been attached fram the applicant which
explores the parking requirements of other carnmunities. The
municipalities of Baulder, Denver, and Lakevwood, these municipalities
would require 18 spaces. In additian, staff has reuiewed parking
requirements as outlined in "Off-Street Parking Requirements" Planning
Advisory Service Report Number 432. Some of the dample parking
requirements noted in this report include the tflllowing:
Aurora, CO - two spaces far each three teachers and ane off-s#reet
passenger loading place for every eight pupils. With the proposed Early
Learning Center, Aurora would require 18 spaces.
Orange County, CA - one space per staff rnember, and one space per
fave students. With the praposed Early Learning Center, Qrange County
would require 27 spaces.
The Public Works Qepartment has dane traffic counts at the Earfy
Learning Center and has found that at #imes there are more than 25 cars
at the existing facility to drop off children. The Planning and
Environrnental Commission sets the parking requirement for uses nat ~
listed in Chapter 12-10 of the Town Gode,
20
~
~ Some communities have extensive requirements regarding access and i
parking. Specifically, St. Louis Gounty, MQ, requires the following: ~
Two spaces, plus one space for every employee on the maximum
shift; a paved unQbstructed pick-up space wifh adequate stacking
area (as deterrnined by the Department of Planning) shall be
provided in addition to stand'ard driveway and parkirrg
requiremenfs, or one space for every six children; a safe
pedestrr`an walkvvay system (as approved by the Department of
Plarrning) through parking areas td the buildrng enfrance, wirh a
~ safety zone a mirrrmum of 15 feet iR width Iaetween parking
spaces and the front of the buildrng entrance, shafl be provided in ;
addrtrarr to starrdards driveway and parking requirements.
The applicant has pravided area for snauv storage which meets the Town
regulations, which state ihat an area equaling 30°!0 of the paved area be
provided for snow storage.
Staff believes that the prouision of the 5"live° parking spaces at the
entrance to the Early Learning Genter will improve both aehicular and
pedestrian circulation into the iEarly Leaming Center.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
be 14cated, including the scale and bulk of the propased use in
~ relatian to surrounding uses.
Staff believes that the use is apprppriate for the character of the
surraunding area. The maximum height of the Early Learning Center ss at
26 ft. The building is 2-story building, which staff believes is appropriate
given the heights and mass of the adjacent emplayee housing.
The proposed Early Learning Center is located 20 ft, from the side
properky line, and 18 ft. from the front property line. While the Housing ~
zone district allows deviations from the 20 ft. setback, subjec# to review by i
the Planning and Environrnental Commission, staff has cancerns
regarding the abi[ity ta buffer the building and the pfay area with adequate
lanc7scaping_ This buffering is irraportan# when considering the noise level
from I-70. Ti he Vail Mountain Schcol has recently ins#afied an air-
conditioning system because the windows of the classraams cannQt be
open during cfass because of naise issues. Staff recommends that a
landseaping and sound berm, which will include large trees, be incEucEed
in the [andscaping plan far the Eariy Learning Center. Because the play
area is located up to the praperky line, there is limited raom for
landscaping on the applicant's praperty. As proposed, landscaping is
lacated an the CaOT right-af-way. CDOT allows trees that are 4"+ in
caliper ta be planted within their right-of-wa, provided tha# no trees are '
planted wEthin 30 feet from the edge of the rQad.
B. FINDINGS
~ The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the follawing finciings
befare granting a conditionaf use permit:
21
1. That the proposed locati4n of the use is in accordance with the purposes ~
of the conditional use permit section of the zoning cade and the purposes
of ihe district in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed location o# the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained uvould not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed uss would compBy with each of the applicab9e '
provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zaning code. ,
XI. MAJQR SUBDIVtSI+tJN i
~
A. GENERAL t?VERVIEW QF A MAJ4R SUBDIVISIUN I
I
Title 13, Subdivisaan Regulations, of the Vai] Town Code establishes the review i
i pracess and criteria for a major subdivision proposed in the Tawn of Vaii. !
Pursuant to Chapter 13-3 (Majar Subdivision) of the Vail Town Gode, the first ~
step in the review process is #ar the appficant to meet with a Town Planner to '
discuss the preliminary pian. Staff has met with the appficant on several
occasions tQ discuss the proposal and address submittal requirements. Sta#f
feels the applicant has successfully complied with the initial step in the review
process, ~
The Town of Vail is required to notify the follawing agencies that a majar
subdivision is proposed and that preliminary plans are available for review:
a. Qepartment of Public Vllorks.
b. Town Fire Department. ~
C. Town Police Department.
d. Public Service Gompany of Colorado. i
e. Holy Cross Electric Association. ,
f. U.S. Vllest '
g. Cablevisian company serving the area.
h. National Forest Service.
i. Eagle River Water and Sanitation Distric#. '
j. Vail Recreat'ron District.
k. Eagle Cnunty Ambufance District.
f. Other interested agencies when applicable.
The next step in the review process shalf be a formal cvnsideration of the
preliminary plan by the Tawn of Vail Pdanning and Environmental Comrriission.
The appiicant shall make a presentation to the Planning and Environmental
Cammission at a regularly scheduied meeting. The presentation and publie
hearing shall be in accordance with Section 12-3-6 Vail Town Code. The
applicant's appearance before the Planning and Errvironmental Commission on
September 24, 2001, meets this public hearing and presentatinn requirement. ~
~ i
22 ~
~ The burden of proof that the application is in campliance with the intent and
purposes of #he Zoning Code and ather pertinent regufations shafl lue upon the
applicant.
In reviewing the preliminary plan, the Planning and Environmental Commission
shall review the application and consider its appropriateness in regard to Tawn
policies relating to:
1. Subdi+risiorr Cc?ntrol;
2. Densities prqposed;
3. Reguiations;
4. Ordinances, resolutions and other appficable documents;
5. Enviranrnentallntegrity;
6, Compatibility with surrounding land uses; and
7. Effects upon the aesthetres of the Town and surraur+ding land uses.
i
The Planning and Environmental CQmmission shalf have twenty-ane days from
the date ot the review of the preliminary plan to apprave, disapprove or approve
with conditions ar modifications, the major subdivision request. Within ten days of
making a decision an the request, the staff shail farwarcf the Planning and
Environmental Commission's decision to the Vail Tawn Council. The Counci{
may appeal the Planning and Environmental Commission's action, The appeal
must be placed within seven#een days of Planning and Environmental
C0(TIi111551p(1's actitan. If the Cauneil appeals the PlannEng and Environmental
~ Commission"s action, the Gouncil shall hear substantially the same presentatian
by the applicant as was heard at the Planning and Environmental Commission
public hearing. The Council shall have thirty days to affiirm, reverse, or affirm with
modifications the Planning and Environmental Cammission decision. The appeal
hearing shall be held during a regularly scheduled cQUncil meeting.
7he final step in the review process of a major subdivision request, after Planning
and Environmental Commission preliminary plan revieuv, is the review of the final
pfat. At any tirne within ane year after the Planning and Environmental
Gommission has taken action on the preliminary p1an, a final plat shaEi be
submitted to the Tawn of Vail Community Development Department. The staff
shali schedule a final review of ttre finaP plat. The final review shall occur at a
regularly scheduled Planning and Environmental Commission public hearing.
The review criteria for a final pfat are the same as #hose used in reviewing ihe
preliminary plan as identified in Section 13-3-4 of the Subdivision Regulations.
According to 5ection 13-3-9: Commission Action; P'ublic Hearing:
The Planning arrd Environmental Commission shall review the final plat
and associated material and rrrformaflon and shall approve, apprave with
modifications, or dfsapprave the plat withrn twenfy orre (21) days of the
public hearing on the ffnal plar of the subdivis+vn ar the final plat rs
deemed appraved. A lorager fime period far renderrrrg a decision may be
grarrted subject to agreemerrt between fhe applicant and the PJanning
and Eravironmenta! Commissiorr.
~ The Town of Vail has the ability to require certain improvements when approving
a rrroatar subdivision. The fafiowirtg improvements shall be required by the
23
applicant unless atherwise waived by the zoning administratar, Planning and i
Environmental Gommission, or Council: !
1. Paved streets and parking lots;
2. Bicycle and pedestrian path linked with the town system and within the
subdivision itself;
3. Trafffc cartrol signs, signals or devices;
4. Street lights;
5. Landscaping;
6. Water lines and fire hydrants;
7. Sanitary sewer lines;
8. Storm drainage improvements and storm sewers;
9. Bridges and culverts;
10. Electric lines;
11. Tefephone Iines;
12. Natural gas lines;
13. Qther improvements not speGifically mentioned above but found necessary
by the Town Engineer due to the nature af 2he subdivision.
B. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR A MAJOR SUBDIVISIQN
Ghapter 13-3, Vail Town Code provides the criteria by which aproposed majnr
subdiuision is to be reviewed. Section 13-3-4: Commissron Revrew of
Application, Criteria, Vail Town Cade states:
The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to sftow that the .
a,aplication is in cornpliance with the intent and purposes of this Chapter,
the Zaning Ordinance and other pertinent regulations that the Alanning
and Environmental Gommissian deems applicable. Due cansrderation
shall be giyen tQ the recommendarions made by publrc agencies, utrlity
companies and other agencies cansulted under subsection 13-3-3C
above. The Planning and Envrranmental Commission sha!l review the
applrcatiQn and consider ifs appropriateness in regard ta 7own policies
relatrng fa subdivision contral, densi[res proposed, regulatrons,
ora+inances arrd resolutiorrs arrd other applicable documents,
enviranmental integrity and compatibrlity wr'fh the surraunding Iand uses
and ofher applicable documents, effeeis an the aesthetrcs of the Tawn.
1. Subdivision Contro!
There are three lots being platEed as part of this majar subdivision
request:
Lot Zonin Lat Size Buildable Area Fronta e
Lot 1 Housing 6.673 ac. 4.573 ac. 1,145.75 ft.
290,678 s. ft. 199,200 s. ft.
Lot 2 General Use 1.096 ac. Nai applicable Via 40 ft.
47,742 s . ft. easement
Tract A Natural Area 17.226 ae. Nat applicable 1,545.02 ft.
Preservation 750,365 s . ft. ~
Lot 1, Middie Creek Subdivision:
24
e
~ Lot 1 is zaned Housing zane district. According to Section 12-61-10:
Other Development Sfar,dards, Vall TflWIl C4{IE:
Prescribed By Planrring arrd Envirorrmental Comrrrrssfon: In fhe H
Dr'strict, development standards rn each of the fallowrng categaries
sha11 be as proposed by the app!lcani, as prescribed by the
Plarrnrng and Envrrnnmental Commrssion, and as adopted vn the
approved developmenf plan.
A. Lot area and site drmensions.
B. Building heighr.
C. Denslfy contrcaJ (including gross residentral tldor area).
7herefore, the Planning and Environmen#al Commission shall prescribe
the minimum lat size and frontage requirements. Staff believes that the
lat size of 290,675.9 sq. ft. and the frantage af 1,145.75 ft. are appropriate
#ar #his subdivision.
!ot z, Middle Creek Subdivision
Lot 2 will remain zoned C;eneral Use. According to Section 12-9G-5:
Develapment Standards, Vail Town Code:
~ Prescrrbed By Planning And Environmental Gommission: In the
General Use District, develapmerrt standards in each of the
fodlowirrg categories shall be as prescribed by the Planning and
Envrrorarxrental Commission:
1. Lat area and site d'imensions.
2. Setbacks.
3. Buifding height.
4. DenSify carrfrol.
5. Site coverage.
6. Landscaprng and site devefoprnenf.
7 Parking and loading.
Therefore, the Pkanning and Environmental Commission shall prescribe
the minimum Cot size and frantage requiremen#s. Staff belie+res that the .
ia# size of 47,741.8 sq, fit, is appropriate for this subdivision. The frontage praposed far Lot 2 is via an existing platted access easernent, which is 40
ft. in width GeneraPly, the minimum frantage requirement within the Tawn
of Vail varies from 30 ft. (residential zone districts) to 100 ft. (higher
intensity c4mmerciaE zone districts). Staff believes that given the curren#
access and use of the site, the 40 ft. access easement prouides
acceptable access to the site. Staff belisues that the intent of the
frantage requirernent has been met and no frontage requirement is
necessary.
The request to tabling the final plat deals primarily with platting the
~ apprapriate easement for this site. The existing access easement will
need to be relocated once access #o the site is determined and the
25
r
deve9opment plan for the site is approved. This will alEar+v the applicant to ~
formally plat the appropriate access easement to Lot 2,
Tract A, Middie Creek Subdivision
Tract A will remain zoned Natural Area Preservation C7istrict. There are no
minimum lot size or frontage requirements in the Natural Area
Preseruation Distric#. Staff believes that the configuration af Tract A is
appropriate for this subdivision.
2. Densi#ies Propased
The praposed Middle Creek develapment will be clustered on Lot 1,
which is 6.7 acres. No additional development is proposed on Lot 2 ar
Tract A at this #ime.
Lat 1, Middle Creek Subdivision
Lo# 1 is zoned Housing zone district, with a land use desfgnation of High
Densi#y Residential, as approved in 2001 by the Planning and
Enviror+mental Commission and Touvn Council. The density allawed in
the Housing zane district is prescribed by the Planning and Enviranmental
Cornmissifln. The applicant is currently proposing 142 dwelling units on
Lot 1. This is approximately 31 dwelling units per buildable acre and 21
dwelling units per gross acre. For comparison, the density aliowed in ~
Lionshead Mixed Use 1 is 35 dwelling units per acre; and 25 dwe[ling
units per bui9dable acre in the High Density Multiple Family zone district.
The land use designatipn of High Density Residsntial s#ates that densaty
in this designation wcruld exceed 15 units per buildable acre. Staff
believes that this density is apprapriate far this subdivisEOn, provided that
in the propossd development meets the requirernents af the Housing
zone district. According to Section 12-6I-1: Purpose, Vail Town Code:
T'he housrng district is intended to provide adequafe sites for
employee housrng which, because of the nature arrd
characteristics of ernployee hausing, cannat ,be adequately
regulated by the develapment standards prescribed for other
residentral zoning districts. !t is necessary in this disfrict to,prourde
deuelopment standards specifically prescribed for each
developmerrt proposal ar pro,rect to achieve fhe purposes
prescrrbed ;rr sectian 12-1-2 of fhis title and to provide far the
pubJic welfare. Certarrr nonresidential uses are alfowed as
conditinnal uses, which are intended to be rncidental and
seeondary to the residential uses af the districf. The housing
districf is infended to ensure that employee hacrsing perrnitted in
the district is appropriateIy locared and designed to meet the
needs of residerrts vf Vail, to harrraonize with surrounding uses,
and to ensure adequafe light, air, open spaces, and other
amenitres approprrate to fhe allotwed types af uses. ~
26
~ S#aff believes that tne proposed density is appropriate for this site
because it is compatible with surrounding uses. This proposal alsa
addresses the demand for employee housing that the Town has identified
as a critical need.
Lot 2, Middle Creek Suladivisipn
Lot 2 is zoned General Use zone district, with a land use designation of
Pub3icf5emi-Public, No dwelling units are proposed on Lot 2. The anly
allowable dwelling units in the Generaa Use zone district are Type IIl
employee housing units.
Tract A, Middfe Creek Subdivision
Trac# A is zoned Natural Area Preservation zone district, with a land use
designation of Qpen Space. Pursuance to Chapter 12-, Vail Town Code,
na dwellirog units are permitted in ihe Natural Area Preservatian District.
3, Requlations
Lo# 1, Middle Creek SubdivESion
Lot 1 is zoned Housing zane distriet. The Housing zane district
regulations have been attached for reference. Pursuant to Sectian 12-61-
11, Vail Town Cade, any development within the Housing zone district
~ requiras an approved development plan.
R.at 2, Middte Creek Subdiwision
Lot 2 wi61 remain zaned General Use. The existing use of the property as
a pubfic utility installat`ran will continue. Any changes in use require an
amendment to the approved derreloprnenf plan, subject to appravaf by the
Planning and Enviranmental Gommission. The General Use zone district
regulations have been attached for reference.
Tract A, Middle Creek Subdivision
Tract A will remain zoned Natural Area Preservation District. The Natural
Area Preservation District regulations have been attached for reference.
4. Qrdinances, resalutions and ather apRlicable documents
The Uail Tawn Code and the Vail Land Use Plan are the applicabae documents
for review of this proposal. The issues relating to the Vail Town Code have been
addressed previously in this memarandum.
The Vail Land Use Plan contains gaals which staff considers to be applicable to
the major subdivision request. The apPlicable goals include.
~ 7.0 General Grawtlh/flevelopment
1.1 Uaif should continue to grow in a controfled environment,
27
maintarning a balarace between resrdential, commercial and ~
recreational uses to serve bo#h the visitQr arrd fhe permanent
resident.
1.2 The quality af fhe environmerrt incfuding air, water and ofher
rratural resaurces shvuld be pratected as the TQwn grows.
1.3 The quality af develapmerrt should be maintarned and upgraded
whenever possi6le.
1.6 Deueloprnent proposals on the hiilsides should 6e evafuated on a
case by casE basis. Limifed developmenf may be permitted far
sorne low intensity uses in areas thaf are nof hrghly visible fram
the Valley fJoor. New prajects should be carefuNy controlled and
develaped wrih sensitivity tQ the environment.
1.7 New subdivisions should nof be permitted in high geologic hazard
areas.
1, 12 Vaif shouCd accornmQdate most of the additianal grQwth in existrng
developed areas (infill areas).
5.0 Resldential
5.1 Addrtional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in ~
exrsting, pfatted areas and as appropriate in new areas where
high hazards do not exast.
5.3 Affordable employee housfng shduld ,be ,made availabfe thraugh
private eh`Qrts, asslsted by limited fncentrves, provided by the
Town of Vail wlth appropriafe restrfctivns.
5.4 Residential growfh shvuld keep pace wrth fhe marketplace
demands far a fu!l range of housing types.
5. Environmentallnteqritv
According to the Town of Vail hazard rnaps, Middle Creek Subdivision is Iocated
within a Mediurn Severity Rockfall hazard and Moderate Hazard DebrEs Flow. A
sEte-specific study has been completed by R.J. lrish, dated August 16, 2001, and
is attached for reference. The report acknowledges that the risk of debris ffaw
from the Middle Greek Valley to be high during the iifetime of the project, with a
volume described as "small ta quite large." The report indicates that the entire
site is Iocated within a high hazard debris flow area. The report also suggests
that the risk coufd be minimized by mitigation measures. The report also
acknowledges that the risk of rackfall is medium during the fifetime of the project.
NlitigatiQn recommended by the report includes dislodging exposed baulders by
hand prior to canstruction. It further sta3es that any boulders would iikely be
trapped in the channel of the creek. The hazard reports have been inclucfed for
reference. Staff cantinues ta have cancerns regarding the hazards on the site. ~
The study indicates that the entire site is located withirr ahigh debris flow area.
28
~ Staff believes that prior to the finai platting of the site, the mitigation of this debris
ffow should be further examined.
As prohibited by Chapter 12-21 of the Tawn Cvde, no developmerrt will be
permitted on slapes greater than 40%. The lots have been configured #o
minimize the area of 40% slopes on Lot 1.
An Environmentai Impact Report has been completed by Stewarl Environmental
Cansultants, Inc., and has been attached for reference. The report states that
while the proposed develQpment of Lot 1 wi[I have an impact on plant and animal
communities presently inhabfting the property, the loss af the 6.5 acres does not
represent a significant impact to plant and animal communities. The repart
recommends that a!i trash durnpsters need to be made bear-proof and exteriar
fighting will need to be minimized. The report additionalay states that the impact
to Middle Creek could include runoff from paved parking areas. A drainage study
has also been, included.
The drainage report has been cQenpleted by Peak Civil Engineering, lnc.} which
as attached reference. The drainage study states that runaff from the praposed
development will follow existing da'ainage patterns.
A traffic study has been attached for review. The study states that the traffic
generated by the praposal will be fess than most apartrnent camplexes of
comparable size, due to th,e proximity to ather modes af transportation.
~ 6. Compatibilitv with Su,rrourtdinct Land Uses
Adjacent land uses to the en#ire Middle Creefc 5uladivision include the folkowing:
Solar Vail - a muftiple-family housing project currently zQned High
Densityr Multipfe Family,
Tract C, Vail Potato Patch - an open space tract currently zaned Natural
Area Preserwation District.
ParceG B, Sprarldle Greek Ranch - an open space tract currently zoned
Natural Area Preservation Disteict. This property is adjacent to Lot 1.
I-70 R?ght-of-Way - land owned by CaOT but located v?+ithin Town of Vail
boundaries. as a road right-of-way, there is no zoning ora fhe
properky. This property is adjacent to Lot 1,
White River National Forest - land owned by the United States Forest
Senrice autside of the Town of Vail boundary.
Staff be[ieves that the subdivision i5 compatible with surrounding land uses.
7. Effects lJpan the A+esthetics of the Town and Surroundinq Land Uses
The existing Mountain Bell tawer and structure will nat change with this
application. Appraximately 17 acres will remain open space. Lot 1 will be
developed within the pararrieters of the Housing Zone District. Aecording to
Section 12-61-11; DevelQprrrent Pfan A'equired:
~ Compatibilrty With lntent: + o ensure the unifrea' development, the
protection o# the natural environment, the campafibifity wr"th rhe
29
surrounding area and to assure that development rn fhe Housing Dfstrict ~
wrll meet the interrt of the District, adevelopment plan shall be requrred.
The review of the development plan for the site by the Planning and
Environmental Carramission anc3 the Design Review Baard include corrsiderations
regarding aesthetics. Appraval of a development plan irr the housing zone
district requires that tne Planning anc! Environmental Commission find that:
8uildrng design wrth respecf to archlfecture, character, scale, massing
and orientation rs compatrble wrth the sife, adjaeenf properties, and the
surroundrng neighbarhaod.
The Design Review Board has reviewed the proposed development pian on
numerous accasions ta ensure compliance with the Town of Vai! Design
Guidelines.
XII. STAFF RECDMMENQATION
A. DeWelopment Plan in the Hausing Zone Qistrict
Ttre Department af Community Development recommends that the Planning and
Enviranmental Gomrnission table the applicant's request for development plan
approval to its August 26, 2002, public hearing. The applicant has requested
tha# this item be tabCed.
B. Conditianaf Use Permit fior the Early Learraing Center ~
The Communitr Development DEpartment recarnrnends that the Planning and
Environmental Commission table the applicant`s request for a conditianal use
permit to allow for the Early Learning Center to its August 26, 2002, public
hearbng. The applicant has requested that this item be tabled.
C. Major Subdivision
The Commun'rty Development Department recommends that the P6anning and
Environmental Commission table the request far a finaR review of a final plat for
the proposed Middle Creek Subdivision located a# a Part of the 51/2 at the 5E1/4
Sectian 6, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, to
its August 26, 2002, public hearing. The applicant has requested that this item
be tabled.
XIII. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Reductions
Attachment 8: Site Analysis
Attachment C: Zone Districts
Attachment Q: Titfe Report
Attachment E. Adjacents
Attachment F: Applicant's Staternents
Attachment Ca: Environmental ]rnpact Report ~
Attachment H: Hazard Reports
~ Attachmen# I. Traffic Studies
~
30
f
\
~ Attachment J: Drainage
Attachrnent K: Parking Managemenf Plan
Attachrnent L: Wetlands Report
Attachment f1A: Noise S#udy
A#tachment N: Agency Notification for Majar SubdivisFOn
Attachmen# 0: Reductians of Plat
i
i
~
~
~
,
~
31
~ ;}lldLUS4'""*, r
~
~ N
a ~
~U4
uj
°eq z ~
~ jE
0
~ ~ cA ~
pa
~
F 1_
T ~
h 4 1
H
~
C" 'PA
4 i il Rli lAf
°~i P-dq°"aq a
# !r ~
`jo4i~=;` - 8utsnoH aiqoP1o3jV laaiZ) alPPiNi , ~ E A
~ + +
~
w
E;F;
sv
i7.1 ~ r-~( $ r..r*s.wrrHS.wr..~ l6yg~Y~KrrN ~ . .
[lI'~
s
i ~
B
~ i
04
~
w w ~ ¦p sa. a5 ~ I
~ S~. E k ap¦p oa~ ap:~p ~ ~•wZ f
g
w~ ~ ~ ~ 2gR
~ r r+IE•! t~ g. F I
C~
~
. y,
x
~
~
~ ' aa 7
~ F
~ . ~ • aa ~ aa~
r~
+
+ +
Y. ~
j
~ ' •"~'T `
~ n •~s , ; g;~
~ , , s
1 ~
* ~r~~ i.: 1 `
~ I
K n ~ 4 S ~ l.r If~ ~ ~ C5
' i s ~i~ ~ ~~,r~~~YYM ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 1
i~ ~ ( 1 rF7 ~
i Fz~ ~ f-r- ,r i' ~q•i' i
I I _ < ~-f ? N 3 ~ , ~ ~ ; ~Q,~~, e t~- - . :
~
R x Fg ` I f £f . - -
> = z
pc I
'~°y~
~ I 7 l~ ~ ip nx2
I r7 ' ~C~= . .i ~
~ C ~PYG' 1~ •v.. f
61
~ ~ ~ ~r) C
s
a= ~ , t j~ , r!
fC f t' c 1 ~
_Y
f "
' r W'~ L~~~ c9.' op ~ ai ct ca ar tr~ co
o) V 4 c~a.
N( .4" ,-O o.0i0 4.Ci O O . V
t " 1
~y~ 'e '~rf Fi
V f . r
;1 F
: r. I~
R
C', ,t
~ I ~ I 1111 I~~ ~LI ~ Mxddle Creck A~ffo~rdable Housing
C~ovme : ~!a k 1+'~
! Yd}, ColQado
-
L u
. _T t
~r
,
,
I'
r
~ . r ~ ~ . .
Ah,
I .
~
t p~
'i
F
k,. ~ '4 Y ~ / ~ l •
i 9
agO
fi
r . . . I
- ir
- ~ ~
~
~
0
,
0
~ i
~
r 4 r ¦ ~
4
Middie Creek Affordable Housing
mauLwa No She
yA echictl4c
_ J
~
+
I
~
I
+ f a ~ ; i Y~ ~
!
`r+ sc ~
f , . ,
~v r
i y ~ ~ ~
r (1 ' '
~
~ ' .I:
~ •
. . . ~
R ~ • / R
Zb.
~
i
1 d ' I !
Middle Ceeok Af fordable Housing
i1oUCds ddi ild a t ;I ~
,rt e t e t1~ y~_
~ V4 ColaNdo
~
~
~
~
~
' ! 1 .K I,, ~ ~ .•f
~
•.1 ~r" ' 1'!) 'i; ~ I:~~,
41~~ _
. f i i ~i ! ,,J~
i ~
, r
Y$~a i~~ i' r r
~
ir ! 1 f
i ~ • 1 r r f 1
' f f. f ~ ~ `I r
~ _ , 1 ~ ~ ~~,QrB J
. . , ; ~
J 1 , . F
~ r
~ ~ -
_ _
~ '
r;
~
. . , , ,
I
~
,r
; i
Middle Creek Affordable Housing
I I ~i LJ! L_L1~LE ~ 9_J_l.l_l_I_W liorauln id19m , ~fj Ei i~'O
~
-
01 ~
,
_A
-
.
~ - , -
1o 0:.a ...a~~..~.. Ax
~ ' ':-.1..~... I..
-
f I.-.1 • K
~ r c •
1 ! `I
.yc
~ ~ ~
S
IA
~ µ4 ~ 6
Mfdde Creek Af}ordeble Hausing
Devdopnmt Plas
Kountain Bdl S1te
VaB, Caicrada "i1
°PD'°P3 'o°A s 3
Q315 IF6 upumry
~ ~fE ~ ! Lm1d iunwdopWp
of 5~ I CN
Bu-rsnoH oIqupzQ3jy 31aaao aiPFIW i ! I # 1
~
Trn~MOF~ yN~~~~ ~ 5I
, „
I e ~ ~~1 ~~t ~y~ ~P6~g ~ p ~i• !ppj .
O 1
' ~ :'61 ~ f+z fi'~r+.r'..1+' E ~ _
z f ~s + , r vl ~
C ~ ly ~ ~ 7t~ ~ , I
Y3~~
I
i i~ 4 ~ 5 t t~~ r$
51 1.~ ~ ~ . d
f~
q j hq~ 1 ~ g * {+~'x~ ~ ~,e
2
i ¢ K Ft ~1 ~P
' 4~ ~•~Gt1I ~ r~~ad ~ ~
~ 1 y 8 qy
HAe
~~~~`~9~~w4~~i!
G~
~
~
1/
i .
,
Er ; ;
C-
341
r ~
in i
p ~7 1
,i / I I F
,l
~
J a
~a
~ ~ ~
1!+ ~
apo~o~ 'UoA i ~
eiIS 11~8 uJ0}9r10pV
UDId pDUJdOpmB(f
f ~
6ursnoH e14vPjog'' )pgjo GIPP!Yy
- , ~ - ~ ~ r
~
i:1
1 r
~
, 1 >
r r. ~
~
I `
, f
I f +li
. 1
f
I i I t,l:,
1~ 1f!
1 ~
, I i r r
I ~
I ~
~ ~ fY
~ ~ . j..'•1
I
' r
~ r?r
~ ~f!
;r
oPDJDP3 '10A
y
~19i'r•~ ~ ' wis iRe ~unon
uoid }uouldoµweq
3 ~
9~;~,~, CulsnaH OMPAOU'd A"J'J QIPP!W t e f I~~ ~ U
E#~ ' ~16. r ~~1
.I . . , . . @.LM. ' , . ' . ~
f.l r
i j 1 1!f ~ ~1
r r
%
r Irl~~~+~~+ 'I. k,' ~
~ , j~: • . ` l ~ ~~l,~,^~I11 f(f~';!~ l
G I ~ ~ 1
I f
" I I !
~d ,
, ~ ,,I 1 f . J ~ '.y 9 Y ' ~ 1 ~tlI • I I
~ i
1li;
~ ~ I l J 1
~
~ ~ f I
1 Y /'7 f 1
P. '
~ ~ . ~,T ~'j ~ _ • ~ , ~ 1
r`il
gy
; ,
~
ff
I
r ,
f yl
~ f~l A
~
~ • r
~ }1 +
, . . . . , . . . . , . . 11 ~ !i ~vY ~ .
upaaopO 'Uoh
a115 Ip8 WnunoIN ~ i
~j jil 1 imid 1uawdopea
`1 01'i% LO
~n • ~ # ~ t
''""'lOWH GWP~~ OPP!~ u
I s.~.y. IL 1` ~
1 ? J
. . ~ I , . ~ . . . . , . . . . . . '~J'
Jf :
. , i . . . . . , . . +
. .
, • I ' y • ' , ~ r i~ ~f'~ir
Y ~ . ~ , ~ 'a S . . ~ r JJ ( A ~ ~ . ~ ~'~f fl,rf ? '
13a;
1 - E~ ~ ,s ~ ~~f p p
~ ~ ' e . ' ~ lt 1i a mS ?
' ~ tdn N^'•rt ~ . . , il ~~y ,l 4~I - .
a~ ~ 2,1 11 I r.
.
,
. . •
.
~ ~ ~ . . rl i I I I ~ /
~ ' j'~~ i!(I I
-
I . _ ~ ! i I
~
1
j
t 1 } l ~ ~f / I I fi
l f+ i E " ~ ' II I?ff~ \
r• ' r ' : . I
l '
1
° • i ~ t3. : j~
tir ~ ~ f +
, i u
' i i=' i ~~y ~~.u ~~s H
t
4 '
~ . • .
3
S
WOAPO '!Wt
RILS IFaB 4DiUnOMY
uoEd luotuaopwoQ
~ ~ s BuienoH gl4'BP-jow iGejo GIPP!YV
~
:
r
-1~
f
a ~ r
I
I (
ri
y;=`~
Y 9
.I '6 • & ~ : , 1
- .I. . ~L . . , Ta~ } ~`.i +r
i ~ • ' ~ ~ f~ ~ Jf f,`
8 Y
~ . . u . . ggR
g Y
. . . , L12
~ ~ ~ ;r f , f !
R~
=f1~'}a 1 OROJOPO '10A ~ i
°;15 Ilog uio;unayi ~ r-
I uold auowdop+,ep ~
~ ~ , 6utsnaH a1qisR_ja
.4'd ~"jo $IPP!YV
rl~. @y!
f
I ~,m • 1 t ~ ~~,~~~~~;~~I~~ i'
N ~
o
I F,,, I~~~V I. i J
! ~ 4 I I
14 ' I ~
a a CD'
~ ~ ~ , • ` ~ i ;
N~
, .
llii!I `
WI
.
~
4 ,
t
To
, 1 a o r . ~e I
i
~ ° .•I ~q ~ ' ~f `
,
~ j
1 i
~ • r . 1
I I I
~ ~ . I . ~ / .
, . ~ . . • ' ,
~ ~ , ~ ~ e ~ . . • ' . ~ ~ . ~ ' . ~ h
' . ~ ' . ' ~ ! ~
~ GPO.tGIGJ 'Iln~. ~
1~ !~j + BiIS IIBB uln}unoti
wE13•. ~p
~ ~t[a p, Ilold }I1DWd0"BQ . !e /OC3~
~ii~~~i ~ ~ ~ ¦ J ~ ~ ~ . .
BwenoH elq`ePjoub' *-mj:7 aIPP!W
~
f,-
,
FWN8,~
. . r---.
I ~ ~ 1
~ ~ ( I
F , 1 ~ f ~s
~
~r
i~ r_~~ , I f i ~ i: ~
I ~
i
7 f
,
Lq
I I?. ~ ~
k .I I
~
r'
~
~ . . . . . ..,a .,.•J- ~ + , ;
~k
wUM Ine
qs mm ~x o Z rv°
4?F~? -wm~a
guisnoH ajqePlQjjV loodo 2IPPiW
~
~Q £
~~t . . . . • ';F F P .
. ~ { .FAr7 S
~
j r
•r. , i. _ i ` ~ r ~ ~ , ~I
rrr
T ~ 1, 7Y r?# l~~ffq •P,
f ~ ~1
~ , . jr ~r ~a ~ ld~ ~ ~•t +t ~ . . ~
.
~
t
r ~ f
~ ~ t~ i ~ ~ r ~ ~ 'M~ }
I f~ ~ ' ~y~, ~ ~~y r . ~ ~ z r" fr i
;
x I~ ~ I
I + i
. ~ -,[e' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ r• i' i - c i ] f . } ~ ~
~..`itLES . , •~fi,+~.r f ~~f, rt ~ . r} > + zy~;'.~ .
4 w# A
Y $ ~ i~ ~
3'{°
+g Ig+ ~ F i/~~. ~ ~y i' /~+5~'~ .
IN
~e~~~~~~:~n~ ~ ~Ci ~ ~~.I~~4 r f ? ~ f ~ ~il ~tr .
~
v .
, , .
~ > . Y<. , .
~
f ±
1I8I&W3 1ra
8uzsnoH aiqvPsa3jV laaj:) aiPPtN
y I
I lisTp a I
~ ~ kf~~ ~C ~~P ~~~r 6 ~a ~~6 ¦ Y ~
I
LJL
- - ~ - - - - ~ yp - t~
r .
I ~ ' jpI; ~ - X ~ f ' tP
b ~ ~ t
Q O rr~y~ ' ~ ' '
d A ~
~
00
MY c
.
~
. : . . ,
0c)
o ~ r a
~ •
I ~
~
t +
i ~
OF-M VA
M R" MMMh
ETU WIM6DI-a
,proj3V looia oIPpiylI
SuisnoH o3qt
.
+
a
I. . ~
.
~
~
``Y` ' ? _ m ~ a
n ~
~ ~
~
~...f ~
/ ,
r .~r. ~ i~r 4 ~
~ L" t. ~"^~•~`~'-.~`;C`~+ Er ~ ~;b ~ . ~
,r++~ , • 1 ~ ,1 ,
-141
Y
4.
~ ~ 4 .
~
~t Y
~ a
f~ b
q
f'.~f.S ~ , • ~ Z a ,wj , I
~ q f
C
.~i/f (f " b ~y 2
f 3 N'r y Y~
I y
7
.
~ ~ ~ ; ~l^~' ~ ~ ,~t.~ ~ F ' f
~ ~ I
' ) ~ '
, ar,n : -}Taoad''+ _ _ - • ~
I ,cM i3" a 7.?01ra
~ ~
-w W-ao~
:~;,'•F~ , 8uzsnoH aiqvPjQjjV laoij 21PP!W
wr R
I . ~ ' ~ ~
;
~
;
I ~wn ue~doaa ~
~ _ _ ~ .
r r l y ` ~ °
r qqq.
~r ~ . ~ p !
/r ~ r.~ ~ ,
~ ~ • ' F;~! ~ ~ ~ I
~t
=
.
~
.
~ t01 Al~ . 3MMa1Yf1 .~ri ~~~p~ ( j/~. 1R , ~1
~ Nry y{dl ~ ~ i ~ 7~ S} f
y ~ x fj p?I
. ' . r,.'~m' , e» .~r".'~ .i''!!' , , • . . P .
~
* +
= r ~jf 2
oPOlC'J'IPA
R+[ elNw1l
-w mondqu+4 i I
RIIFSnoH aiqBPio;jy laojo aiPP!Ni : • ~ ! ~'M ~ :
5
p
~ r., ~ f ~ i~': a~..
I I I I ~ I
_._._.L.--~ ~ a-•-~-<~ ------L.~.~ - ~ 1_.r..~ _.L._.I I .J_
~ I I I I I j
I I I ! ~
I - I I
.1
- ~
, ~ - ,
~ -
-
i
x, L
I ~
I - I - I ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ; ~ _ - •-O ! ~ f, _ _ _--0 i_~ ~ - -
I
~R
~ I ~
_
, - ; ~ ~
. I Es
~ ° ~ -I-._..~ ~ ._._,=I ' i~ _ -0
o
i. ~ -----o o ------~i =-1-1-0 o
- - i-~-~ -=~-----o I
V
I I i
j ~
I I q I
~
~
;
# ~
nY re~.~iep+eG i I
gatsnoH alqvPjojjV
122ja aYPpiw
~
~
i
» w.~ i
I ~
L._. ~ ~-----a
~
~ I # I I i
9 ~
. ~ ~
I I I ~ (~D I e ~
I I ~ I C ~
I I ~ ,
I ! 9 I r ~ -~o
- ._.-0
i -
Ai-
! I I V ~ ~ I•i ~
f ~ I I p ~ I I ~ I
; d b b a ~ ~ ~ ~
G
i
~
} ~
OPWMCJ 'PA 11 i ~
Ri In
Suisnog alqvpia.~jV 1=3 oIPFlW : • ~ i~ ~g ~ E
' ~L -~1I~~~~ ' `
i - ----~-~--~----0 ; -----rt-~--~-~
- i i i i
"i i
i -i.• I - ~ I •-o I~
;
i } IO , , I I
eo
i 4 • j x~ r
.i.- _ .~....p
I ~s 1 J~q _
i IT 'g ~ i ~'J I I
i - - .._.!,--M---~^• - -'C?
li .
P
P
~
T T
~
WltrtMM 'PAl1
i c~. I'3 asW Rsdafua0
SuisnoH aiqvPlojjV laai:) oIPPi1H
I
I
~
~
I~ I I I I I I
ElEl'
s X i
r-1:~
I I I ~ _ _ ~
.
~ Y ' ~ 1 4 . ~ ~
: De
N~i , f4 ~ ,~nFt
W •
~
T ~
? i `U~-
~ - ~
;
~
1 1
1
, l
_ 1[ , -
I k
~ .
r-
.,_r~ ~ - -
t ~ - y
i
~i
;
11 Q{ ' Clf
~ID _ J
~
110
1 1
I- -1
~y : ~ ~ 41~ " a!9 I?~i 4no+e11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
guisnog alqllpjo3 2013 OIPPiNi
Q
.a ta ~f ~
, -
~
'
[1 `
~ ~ -
` 7
~
! I I I I I -
~ , .
I
~w
~
~ ; ~ ' ~ ~ • d~
~
I -7
¦ li
E
I I I I i I tl
~i - -
{ I~ e ~
~
_ _ - - -
If
~II ~ 1i I
110 lc
~
I -
~
$ I
~ .
+
#
~
UP-PM ,&A
mr 44040-t
¦ ~ ~ r ~ s
:f ~6rf~ i~ gZ1ZSfl0H 2t4$Pliy33d looiD 21PPIi+li
. . . ~ I ~ . ~ .
ra~~~~
~
ra ra re ~~J' .n r. ra g~7
,L
laT
;
~ _ -
~ -
I I I ~ I
(~~I i - -
I I f I I I I
-0
I ;
~ F
~ ' I i I~ 4 I I I i
- i 'I - ` - - -
V -
_ t- -fi - -f- - ~ -d - -
I
- - , -
I I ~ 1 I I ! f I ~
~
_z
+
i J
guisnaH aiq~pioj~. aaij 21pPiHi
~
; t ~ ~ ~
~
il
~
F .
~F 77.
1~ ...:.1. . ...;...1. ~ ~
.
- ~ . . Nhl .~C ~ ~
.
. . y
q I
- , l7
~ =
. ~
.
' - Ri%4~f
? -~.i.::
~
_ ~ . _ .
. ~
'I' ~ ~ ~ : : . . J , . i
_
-
:
a ; ~ _ ~ . ~.a.... : : :I t I
.
~
,
~ . ~ . I 1 _ _
~ i • ~ ~ ~
~
~ - ~ ~ ~--r ,~--L -
~
~ -
~
, .
w \
~
,
- - - ~ • ~
.
~ ,.f I
~
L_~~
M - ~ - - , _
i . ~
~
~
i - . ~ . _ _ j..._ ~
i 7. - J '
r ~ -f b
~
~ - . ; ~
~ _ . . . ~
~
+ #
J
~~i anOF-M ..a x..~„.q
~
SuasnoH ai4vPla~jV laaia ajPPlYIi
g-
r~ I~ YA 1! l8 J~N !s ra ~
E~
~
~
I T
~ -
- -
- - - , e.~ F
I - l
I L I
: '
I. - ~ f - -
`a -
~ y
1 =
I J ~
~ F
~
r
~ -
-~7I - ~
v
n
I 7r
.
~
I~- "-1
i,
-
I ~l
_o
~ ~ x
~ ~
i9 •i~ : I+A + ~ ~ I O
+Rf In wowwR ~
BQisnog ajqrpio; 0013 21PPjIN
0-
; ~ ~ . ~
E ~
~ I 1 i I ~ I ~ I ~~3 I
~ ara~
I
i
I ~
i
i I I I I i I ~
I
i I L~J
' ~
-
- ~ J,.`~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , I
~ i ~ I rJ - I - I I I
1
.C
- r N - -I -
K.' ~
i
- , -
~ - ' ? ~
y _
1
- . ~ - ( - ~ -I - .
~
1 ~
I
~ ' . I
- ~
~ - -
-
~
-
i - -1 -
-
i ,
L7
r
~ - , -
+ +
~ ~
OPUW fiA
WIS 1191 *I*+~PQR i ~
nfJ ~i~(1
~ai
;ji~i'•~ snog alqzpjajIaaj3 aiPP.
~iNi .
t. .M .r ILS ~
~
1 ~
f I I I I I I
I I ~
~
= i
. 4_
i LL - -
L .i
f I ~,I I j I {
u
.7 ~
i le' •~~1~.,.~ r-
q
I
1.7
I` r •_y
I
~I 4 - .A' ri L LJ
r
-
f
- - - - ~
~ - 1
_L = I I _ ~~v
_ L1 { ~ ; -
~ -
I i 10
I I I ~
+ +
~ J I
D"90 t.A
"s l,bi .,,.,~~K
"Bu[snOa 'e io 22a a[pPt
.
H iQ~ ~ ~3~ ~ ~ .1K
~0
• ~ ~ , +
ri - re ar ~.r i~ re ra
I 0I
~
~ I
.
~ I I I I l I E
i {
I r
!
I I I 1 I I I
.
I:
I ii I I ! I I I
~ -
- - r :
~ ~ • it
Q- - _ ~ ' l «7
4 a~ . .
~ I i ~ I I p
J
I
"S
II ~ ~ ~ y
~
8uisnog ajqzpiajj'v 122lz) o[PFl1'N ~
~
a
T
1 ~ Y
I I 1 I ~
~
~n-
~
I
C7------- -
, ~ ~ - -
~
- ~ - .
I ~ f I f I I ~
I
~ I
-6
~
; j
-
I
1, I
~ ~ ~II I I I
I
r ~ ~
~
i ~ - --t--~ ~
Jf I
~I I
I +
+
~
L
~ I
guts~aoH ai9eP1o.~jV a~a~3 oIPPt~I
4 ~ ~ Q Q ~ Q
Q- . ~ -~------~-------a
; 1 I ~p ' r Q i
i i ~
;
~ r.. ~ ~
~
~
~
. ~
' I
I
~
-0
, i
I I
I
~ m ~.Q
+ .
~ ~
c~ll'II OPurtvJ'IlRA
qi pg TMM!1
guisnoH Oiql!PIOJJV 10013 OIPPiy1i
+
i ~ ~ ?
I e G~ ~__-~i O
r = ~ - ~
.
~
~ .
;
~ r-
T
~ - ~
.
_a
~
T-1
- ~ ~ t -
-
~
~
~
.
. :
, ~ ~
I N~
~ • •y II~
ti BG
~ . . . . . ~...r
: f
- p _7
- ~ - - _
~ _ •
~
~ - ~ " ~ j~- - -
~ 9 ^ E
n~- a - ~
~
+ +
~ I
OPUM VPA 11 4
II+[
: ' " R gutsnoH alqEploJ aaJJ 2[PPiW
M~E~'~ ~ 1 r 1
~
i O@C~70OO :fl-:: -[f-
i - -
;
~.-.fi...,.-
I
EJ
_ 0000 0 El
- ~ -
~
i ~ _ _ -
~ I ~ - -
~ p- - _ R - - -
- i ~
El - -
~ II
I °
Q---•-•----~ i
! El
1 ~
~ I
I
? ~ ~
_ If
, _ .
~
e
c•r-- - ~ . ~
I
o--
i i
o ~ • ~
~ -
N r-r- - - -
- - - - - -
o- - _ - - - ,
• - - : .
-
_ _ o-~-----_._-
+
L ~
~„"s°~`~ ? ` ' • !
8ats~c~K
.
i ~
- ~ - - - ? C~i-,
[d
o- ~
,
13 I
I
o ~ ; -
` i r-3`
CII °
_ ~ . •
<•Y.- ,
~
- ~ .
~
~ b
e ~G ; I
a"aJ `IiIA ~ ~ ~ LJJJJ!JJJ ~
mo ITON31
11; o~! j ~ gutsnoH oiqLPlo3jV joaij oIPP,Ni . ~ Uf e 11 y
: i. I ti~ ! 1~~ r~•] [ i 1~T~1~11 F~~ ! r f~
2
i n tl~~t~'~~Eyelf ~
I
~ o00oooooaooopvooooo~o~
,
~
Q-` -
-
1
- - ~ ~
_ a-~ - - I I ~
- - - - ~ y
~
o - r e- ? -g- - =es- - 0 ~
~ e
, - _ ;
0-0--p ?
-fl. . _ - - - ~ ? ~ - _ i ,
e- - - !
;
? fl- 1:1 =.o ' t', ~ -cr- ~ fl o ? ~
; _ - D~~~- Lf C7
~
. . . ; ~
+ ~
-u7 70
1 - - ~
~ ? ~ ~ 4 _ ~ Q - ~
A ~ - = - i
_ - 6
- I ,
~ - -
1
~ ? ? I ? ? El r~ ~.-_-,13_"` ? - _ I i~
- I
o L7
? ? 0 ~ ~ ! ~ - ti
I ~ 4 ~ r
14 = I 1 I`~ ~J v ~ ~ ~ 1 ~
~
C3 D 0 O ~
ry5,~ ~
„ L, ~ Q ~ . ? ~
~ - - i
i ~ I . ~ ? ~SS ~ ~ - - . I ~
i~~~' ; ? o C~+~ ti i i~ -C3~ p i ~
, ? ~ 1 . , _ - . ~
Cl
~ - _ - - ~
C~1 C3 ~7 ; ~ ?
y
, 0 0 10
t ~
`
ti
~
~r p
~
+
+
I~P c~,4j'l ~
~w 8uisnoH'iqtPlojjd laaia 21PPIK
+
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ e ` _ ~ ~ i ~ ~ f y ' ~ ~ ~ r ? ? ~ ,
f
~ OOOOOOOOOC~iOQflO000qflCa0~ !
? Ll C7 f
, ~ M r
i
I ~
' - ! ~ ? Q ? ~ II
Q El ?
? Cl ? 1
I ~
E>-
? - ? r~ Ei
! E~~ ? ? ~
? ? r
i I! L. ~ I ? ~ , 1 i
1991
f
0 f El ? ? ?
Lt I
~ ;~e~ rp IFr/ i M Q ? ? i F ~
0 ? ? 0 ? 0
_ 'r~f 0 d 13 ° ~
? r~ S. ? ~ i ? ? '
17
~ ? ? i
_ - i G~l
o rx o. _0=_--D-- I ~
i
? El ? I
- - i
_
- _ ;
I = ~ ? ? El
i C}- I o
'i
v. `
i
~
~
+
+
L ~
-
Wunca tPa I I I I f I I ~ i
$as u% •mmm ~ I
c~ i jfl I Um m~+dotou~I ~ ~ !
gutsno a ~ Ia aa3aiI~~
H i~l P.~3~' $ 3 P.Y1I
? ? n o
? -13- T o
~
..F
- - -
~ - - - _ - - - - .-v~
~
: _
-
~ d
--u _ i
_
~ Q - - -
?~~-==r~- _
? ? . . _ - - - _
I
Q ?
~j----=--- - ~ j i
i ? ~ ~f Q ? j
I o
0 o a o:~ _ ~
_
~`j--~--------- rr--
El
~ ~ ~j----------- , ?~~1~ C7 ~~~1;~~,1~~!j~~~i ~h;~ ~I~
,
~ ~ i j ~ •
13
Q I- -
~I
C].l.?..I4?'- --i 0
. i
:
OOOOC~C~OOBO I'!Iy~ i~~1,L]
! I
~
00(J 60000000 ,
. ~
* +
~ ~
w•nM 1kPe
~ ~ alill~~![ ~
t ~
SutsnoH alqvp~oxndvAm
jjV 12aia oiPFlYli E f~'~ i:~:~'~,,
+
x
.i
!
!
0000000oooooeooooo~~o
~
i ~,-L--
O
? I
- ~L
l°•
i ~
- - - - - - - - - - - -
I 11 ? ? ;
;
i ;
i . ? C7 ? 0 lQ
~ o 0 0 ? ~a ? n ? ?
- -
? ? ? ? I ~ ? ? E] El D '
,
,
G ? ? ?
,
,
. ~
,
- -
- - - - -
- - -
I L• -
~ -
-
I ? ?
.
i
,
_
~
o o
I -
~ ? ?
I ~ • i I
I '
~
I
~
I ~
+ +
~ I
-
OrSMa 1Pn
SaisnOH aiqloFjoj3Y looia oiPPiYY
- j~` ~ 1 [ ~ I?' ~Y~ 1 j~
~
0000oooe 0 0 (D aaeD maooa0 0 C7 O ? ? ~
. \ ~
~
~ ~o o ~ ! ao o
- _ - ~ ~ 0 ~ I
_ - - ~ ~ - n ? ~ ~o
? L5 ?
00 - ~
i - -
~
; -
Q T?
0 0 - ~ ~I f @ i
_ . ~ x
OOU
0. 'o I n LJ -0-- I ,
1 4f j
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?
OeO - - i p
OOQ 13 i
4--- _ --e ~ 0 ? L ~i
o fl ? a ? a
- ~
- - - j
- - d fl a o o
0 r~ CI ? L
~
~
~
~ ~
r- ~
~"CM A
Irv xmffmjq
~
lutsnoH alqvpja;~~ aai3 aiPPlYN r . ~ ~
I~~° ] rR - 1 9 I
+
~a
~r1
;
011
~ d L yll
- ~
I ~ ~ •'t -
~
i
i ,
~
~ i
- ; 13_
° i a? '
_ z
~ -
- - ~
;
_
- ~ - O-
~I d I~
SI: ~ II 6ie1: i~ ~
~
I {
~
T - ~
~ I
.J
~ I
qmmM VIs ~ .
ra ~ ~
SuqsnaH *1
: . ~ ~ 1 t ' • ~
qquQ3N inia oIPPqq
+ +
• ~ 0.
N
~
~
`y' ~ y R'. JT . . ..W
• ~
,
{ # ,
,
i
.
a='- - r+f' ~
~ ~ r.. i;
> L-.
i r~, ' 4.(• . ~~r ~
+
L J
~~RJ tiPA f t
WW~UA~~ ~
ai4ePioj3y jaw3 aIPFt1N
.
+ +
f ~ $
_
'.ft.~ . . . - _
~
. . ~ ~ _ . . ~ .
t ~ ~ . .
~ ff
,t h
~ fl~ 7
{ f.
w
. ~ ! f#s Y
~
- . ~ ~ 7 . . '
~
/ ? g
r
7fk
~
q~,
,,,,yy
1~
~ . .
41F ~ r'~ •
+0
gg
r ~ >
~
~ v.
~
~
L_
`ii ~ ~1 ~ll ~ ~
Mi
SuPoH *Tqgplojj''V Ima oIPPtIAi
~ _ - • ~ . ~ • i ,
+ }
v. ~
9 ~
f` :3
\ A_ A
i~
= t ~ 'r,.. +~.f
'
t
r
~ Y q
~u .
~
jK.
~`:5, .
t ~
-
~x
F .
_ y
-
,l
-
.4} i .
K ~,a
f .
L ~
dPOMJ IPA
A4qlpm)[
8?ztBnoH 3i4 Pjo~ 1=3 OIPP!N
+ +
~
tr, ~
x -
r ~
- ie~=;
~
; a~.
S r `T
k =
~ . r
td
i ~
~ ~ ~ •
1. . . ' ~
~ ~n•, . ~ -
L ~
t ~l~F7 `~A s ~
qu 1N ipp+![ ~
=1~~~ ,s SmsaoH'i4wFaJN 110013 O[PpM
+ +
- - -
~ ~5..
B
~v
k,
S
~ ~ . . , .
i
~
~I
I
~
J"
' ,
t'
~
s~•.~ r '~~y;% al:
F
l
l
~
+ - +
~ J
= Su~sa~g oiq~ePjvj~N ~[~a oiPP!KI
N r i IO Iw
_ +
+
: '7777
~
~ - ~
~
;
•
mk~l
¦ . . L4.AAVO " . . . .
~ Iv~ ~
I jI Ll YrJ
I
E ~
i
~
~ I ¦ l W , ~ ~ .
. ~ ^ . . .
f i" Y
I ~
T
~
+ +
L -
~,~„a~~r,, # ~ ~
x ~`~p~~ i i 1. ? ~
R
? ~u!sn01~ '~0 r - _
!R .
t
• kx
~a
~s .
? ~
1 } 1
t
~ k
x4+~ .r 4 ' ' * 9
Al
~
~ w~e~:~ , ~ ~ ~
suisnoH *iQ'sP~o;jV
looJa aiPPiw : . # ~ i~ I~ : • ~
: =s• 1 i 1. ~ ~ ~ ~.e ~ i E ~
I + +
~
~ . ~
C ~
~
1' 1 E
1~- fkRdV4Ra[A ~ .
Ln
~
~ -
-T~
~y
t~
~ -
l
1l I
. r .
. ~ .~m`~-~'~~K"~'T{,, •
Sf '
.t kFTa .i rd
~i.• . 'k . ~ ~ y1-
~
J
L
i tmld }UGUAd[~1~'`eQ ~ i ~ ~
~?q~P~o~}'d ~`~IPP4~
b,tGSnoH _ ; r 1
r
r~ ~ f A t 1 ~
r ) !
r f ~
. .
f `,'?Y f f
I A
e
~
1
,
I '
~
f ~
~
!
+ r ~
'L.~ ~ ~ I 1 f f +
~ ~ 1 l p ~ t
+ y i`
i+
f+ ~
4
~r
~ ~ . fl
~ 1+~i I , 11
e t
1 = f + ~
Y\ ~1 t
1
13 :Iuew43911tl
~
~
I
I
c~
i
ro I
~
Q .~C C~.
ca
zt~ rt
r
CV ~ Lfy
~ F..
~ y.... I
~ ~ a u~i ~ ~ i
O O tce)
- cLf p, I
~ ~07[O Q t~~
L [pWC7< QqfiQCP ~-O¢I'- TCr!f~ O CVd' CQ
d Nz CONZ N r-NZN co ~t N NCV N W
~
0
a o
LO o
l{l O
u ~
. ~
~
Q' O
u} cr r
~ h+ C*7 CM
O~ lt~ ct~ a~ 4~ cr~~ ~ pj C\! L0fJt W W
`o cD ooo 000o pon o Ln rl-
o~ U t3.. a.
a cu cm cv cv N N cv eq cu cm cv cv cM r co
~
ff
cn
co
~ L L L Yr
LO ~ (D
2 Qf
C c c
~ Q) Q~ (D CD
C:) C) U U U
~ a~ ~ ~ ~ rn
Cb cs~ ~r c c c
in ~ ~ tIif ~ 5 i1~ ~ C ~ C
~,c~a ~zc,°2w~ ay~~v~w~m~u}~i ~ m rn ~ a a> E ai cm
E C') J IC 0) CD J C J C J C
in ~ ~Vl
~ y L - ~
~ co G. ~ i1J 2 c] m as w W2 =W2
sn
Q cu Y ~
~ ~r rv a ~
"C ~ ~ ` ~
{I~ N J Cl) O.. G7 J CL co
i
~
I
~
I
~
U ~ j
CS'
~ ~
O
N lt')
Q
i & ~
Cl.. C+J Ct? rf
~
70
~
-°~w w w a ~~~a cna
4 cL 12- a_ ~
~ va va cn ua cr rs cn N c0.~ c0.j 0 c0~. 00
L) Vi `t i1 0 ci~ L1 Q cC a.
3 C C C C O Q7 ]l- (A Q Q tA fJl 0- (!1
ND 3 7 7 00 'a' LC3 Q cn cn ~C'7 cn Od
+rf CS3 'C' I.n r ~ (S) Iti CV 9t r f3') I-- CYJ
r.'Rt CV CV IT CA f- tD N N C'7 CV r h- r-
a
~
~ L
C{~ ~
C rt+
RS ~
43~
~ L)
tn E (n O 0 2 0)
o . O 0-p C
T ~ a~i (-bi m ~
p Oa) Q m m °a) 61
[[S ~ ~ CO ~ co ~ cU O
r5 r~
.0 h Vl ~ VJ n 0 co L
o o a o m~ ni mNN~ H iil2-o
~ ~ c3a - c~a ca
- ~ KI u- ~ c ~ Q ca ~11~ vk ~ ~ m ~
r_ ~ Ol (D a) cll
m m m ~ E ~
Q r~ w ? ~u~ ~m a m~ ~cn ujt~U~
~ AFtTICLE I. HaUSING (H) DIS7FiICT
SEC'TION:
12-61-1: Purpose ,
12-61-2: Rermit#ed Uses '
12-61-3: ConditionaC Uses
12-61-4: ACCe550C}/ USE;S
12-61-5: Setbacks
12-61-6: Site Coverage
12-69-7: Landscaping and Site Dewelopment i
12-61-8: Parking and Loading
12-61-9: Lacation of Business Actiwity
12-61-10: Other Development Standards
12-61-11: Qevelopment Plan Required
12-81-12: Development Plan Contents
12-61-13: Development Standard s/Criteri a for Evaluation
12-61-1: PURPQSE:
The Housing District is intencEed to provide adequate sites for employee housing which,
because of the rtature and characteristics of employee housing, cannot be adequately
regulated by the development standarcls prescribed for other residential zaning districts.
It is necessary in this district ta pravide develaprnent standarcfs specifically prescribec! '
for each develapment proposal or project to achieve the purposes prescribecE in Section
~ 12-1-2 of this Tifile and to provide far the public welfare. Certaira nonresidential uses are
allowed as conditional uses, whieh are intended to be incidental and secondary to the
residential uses of the District. The Housing District is intendec{ to ensure that emplayee
hausing permitted in the District is appropriateiy located and designed to meet the needs
of residents of Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and ta ensure adequate kight,
air, open spaces, and other amenities apprapriate ta the allowed types of uses.
12-61-2: PERMITTED IJSES:
The following uses shall lae perrnifted in the HDistrict:
Deed restricted emplQyee hvusing units as further described in CFaapter 12-13 of this
Title.
Passive outdoar recreation areas, and open space.
Pedestrian and bike paths.
72-61-3: C(7?NDITICDNAL USES:
, The following conditional uses shail be permitied in the H District, subject to issuance of
a conditional use permit 9n accardance with the prowisions of Chapter 16 0# this Title:
Cammercial uses which are secondary and incidental (as determined by the Planning
and Enviranmental Cornmission ) to the use of emplayee housing and specifically
serving the needs of the residents, and developed in conjunction with employee
hausGng, in which case the foilowing tases may be allowed subject ta a conditional
use permit:
~ ganks and financial institutions.
Eating and drinking establishments.
At4achment: G
i
Heaith clubs. ~
Personal services, including but not limited ta, laundromats, beauty and
barbershops, taifor shops, and simi[ar services.
Retail stores and establishments.
Dwelling units (not emplayee housing units) subjec# to the following criteria to be
evaluated by the Planning and Environmental Commissaon: ;
i
A. Dwelling units are created solely for the purpase of subsidizing emplvyee ~
housEng an the property and;
B. Dwelling units are not the primary use af the property. The GRFA for
dwelling units shall not exceed 30% of the total GRFA constructec6 on the ;
praperty and;
C. awelling units are only created irr conjunct€on with employee housing and; ~
D. Dwelling units are compatible with the proposed uses and buildings on ~
the sfte and are compa:tible with buildings and uses on adjacent
properties.
Outdoar patios
Public and private schools and educationa6 institutions, including day-care facilities.
Pubiic buildings and grauncis.
Public parks.
Public utilities insta9lations including transmission 8ines and appurtenant equipment.
7ype VI employee housing units, as furkher regulated by Chapter 12-13 o# this Title. ~
12-61-4: ACGESSORY USES:
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the H District: ~
. i
Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupaiion permit in accardance with
the provisians of Section 12-14-12 af this Title.
Minor arcades
Private greenhouses, toal sheds, playhouses, attached garages or carports, swimming
poals, ar recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitied resedential uses.
C)ther uses custamarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, anci
necessary for #he Qperation thereof.
12-61-5: SETBACKS:
The setbacks in this district shalC be 20' from the perimeter of the zone district. At the
discre#ion af the Planning and Environmental Commission, variations to the setback
standards may be approved during the review of a deveiapment plan subject to the I
applicant demonstrating compfiance with #he fallowing criteria: i
I
A. Proposed building setbacks provide necessary separation betnreen buifciings and
riparian areas, gevPogically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive
areas.
B. Proposed building setbacks will provide adequate availability of light, air and open
space.
C. Propased building setbacks wiil prouide a cornpatible relationship with buifdings and ,
uses on adjacent properkies.
~ ~
. D. Proposed btailding setbacks will result in creative design solutions or other public '
benefits tha# could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed
setback standards.
Variations ta the 20 ft. setback shall nat be allowed on property lines adjacent to HR,
SFR, R, PS, and RC zoned properties, uniess a variance is appraved by the Planning
and Environmental Commission pursuant to Ghapter 17 af this Title.
12-61-6: SITE C(JVERAGE:
SEte coverage shall not exceed fifty-five percent (55%) of the total site area. At the
discretion of the Planning and Envirvnmental Commission, site coverage may be
rncreased if 75°/Q of the rec;uired parking spaces are underground oE enclosed, thus
reducing the impacts of surface paving provided within a development, and that the
minimum landscape area requirement is met.
12-61-7: LANDSGAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT:
At least thirty percent (3D°fe) af the total site area shall be landscaped. The minimum
width and length of any area quafifying as landscaping shall be fifteen feet (16) with a
minimum area not less ihan three hundred (300) square feet.
12-61-$: PARKING AN!] 1.{3ADINfa
Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Title. No
parking or laading area shall be lacated within any required setback area. At the
discretion of the Planning and Environmental Gommission, variations ta the parking
~ standards outlined in Chapter 14 may be appraved during the review of a development
plan subject to a Parking Managemeni Plan. The Parking Management Plan shall be
approved by the Planning and Environmental Commissiora and shall provide for a
reduction in the parking requirements based an a demonstrated need for fe+nrer parking
spaces than Chapter 10 of this title would require. For example, a demonstrated need
far a reduction in the required parking could inclucfe:
A. Proximity or availability of al#ernative mades of transportation including, but
noi limited to, public transit or shuttle services.
B. A limitatian placed in the deed res#rictions limiting the number af cars for each
unit.
C. A demonstrated permaneni prograrri including, but not limi#ed to, rideshare
programs, carshare programs, shuttle service, or staggered work shifits.
12-61-9: LQGATION fJF BUSIFJESS ACTIVITY:
A. Lirnitation; Exception: All conditional uses by 12-61-3 of this Arkicle, shafl
be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except far permitted
Ioading areas and such activities as may be specifically authorized to be
unenclosed by a conditional use permit and the outdoor display of goods.
B. Outdoor Display Areas: The area to be used for outdaor display must be
lacated directly in front af the establishment displaying the goods and
entirely upan the establishment's Qwn property, Sideuvalks, building
entrances and exits, driueways arcd streets shall not be obstructed by
outcboor display.
~ 12-6I-10: OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARnS:
PrescribEd By Planning and Environmental Commissiore: In the HDistrict, developrtient
standards in each of tfre following categories shafl be as propased by the applicant, as ~
prescribed by the Planning and Environmental Commission, and as adapted an the
approved development plan:
A. Lat area and site dimensioras.
B. BuiEding heEght.
C. Density contral (including gross residential floor area).
12-61-11: DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIRED:
A. Cflmpatibility With Intent: 7'o ensure the unified development, the
pratection ot the natural environment, the carropatibili#y with #he
surrounding area and to assure that development in the Housing District
will meet the intent af the Qistrict, a development plara shall be required.
B. Plan Process And Procedures: The proposed development pfan shall be
iro accordance with Section 12-61-12 caf this ArtFCle and shall be submittec[
by the developer ta the Administrator, who shall refer it to the Planning
and Environmen#al Commission, which shall c4nsider the plan at a
regularly scheduled meeting.
C. Hearing: The public hearang before the Planning and Environmental Gommission shall be held in accordance with Sect4on 1 2-3-6 of this Title. ~
The Planning and Enviranmental Commission rnay apprave the
applicatian as submitted, apprave the application with canditions ar
modifications, or deny the application. The decision of the Pianrting and ~
Environmental Commissian may be appealed to #he Town Council in
accardance with Sec#ion 12-3-3 of this Title.
D. Plan As Guide: The approwed development plan shall be used a:s the
principal guide fnr all development within the Mousing District.
E. Amendment Process: Amendments to the approved development plan
will be consiclered in accordance with the pravisions of Section 12-9A-1 0
of this Ti#Ie.
F. Design Review Board Approval Required; The development plan and any
subsequeni amendments thereto shail require the approval of the Design
Review Board in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 11
af this Title prior to the commencement of site preparation.
12-61-12: DEVELORMENT PLAN CONTENTS:
A. Submit 1Nith Application: The fallowing irtformation and materials shall be
submitted with an application for a proposed development plan. Certain submittal
requirements may be waived or madGfied by the Administrator if it is
demonstrated Qhat the material t4 be waived or modified is not applicabGe to the
review criteria, ar that other practical solutions have been reached.
1. Application form and filing fee.
2. A written statement describing the project including information on the nature ~
of the development proposed, praposed uses, and phasing plans.
~ 3. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing canditions af the
property to be included in the devefopment plan, including the Iqcation of
impravements, existing contours, natural features, existing vegetatian,
watercQUrses, and perimeter praperty lines af the parcel.
4. A title report, including Schedules A and 134.
5. Plans depicting existing concEitions of the parcel (site plan, filaor plans,
elevations, etc.), if applicable.
6. A complete zoning analysis of the existing and proposed development
including a square footage analysis of all proposed uses, parking spaces, etc.
7. A site plan at a scale not smaller than one inch equals twenty feet (1" = 20`),
showing the location and dimensions af all existing and proposed buildings
and structures, all principal site deuefopment features, vehicular and
pedes#rian cireulatian systems and proposed contaurs and drainage pians.
8. Building elevations, seetions and floor plans at a scale not srnaller than one-
eighth inch equals ane foot (1f8" = 1'), in sufficient detail to determine flaor
area, circulation, Eocation of uses and scale and appearance of the propased
develapment.
9. A vicinity plan showing existing and proposed improvements in relation ta all
adjacent properties at a scale not smaller than one inch equals fifty feet (1'" _
50`).
10. Phato overlays and/or other acceptable visual techniques for demonstrating
ihe visual impact of the prapased development on public and private property
in Yhe vicinity af the propased development plan.
11. An architectural or massing madel at a scale sufficient to depict the proposed
~ develapment in relationship to existing develaprnent on the site and on
adjacent parcels.
12. A landscape plan at a scale not smaller than one inch equals twenty feet (1"
= 20'), showing existing landscape features ta be retained and removed,
proposed landscaping and ather site development features such as
recreation facilities, paths and trails, plazas, walkways and water features.
13. An envieonmental impact report in accordance with Ghapter 12 of this Title
unless waived by Section 12-12-3 of this Title.
14. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by Acfministratar.
B. Copies RequirecE; Model: With the exception of the madel, four (4) compEete
capies of the above information shall be submitted at the time of the apptication.
When a model is required, it shall be submitted a minimum af two (2) weeks prior
to the first formal review of the Planning antl Environmental Commission. At the
discretion af the Administrator, reduced copies in eight and one-taalf inches by
eleven inches (8 112" x11 format of all of the above infarmation and additional
copies far distributian to the Planning and EnWironmental Commission, Design
Review Board and Town CoUncil may be required.
12-61-13: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDSIGRiTERIA F{)R EVALUATiQN:
The foilowing criteria shalf be used as the principa[ means far evaluating a proposed
deveiopment plan. It shalE be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the
proposed development plan cQmplies wi#h alC applicable design criteria:
~ A. Building design wi#h respect ta architecture, character, scale, massing
and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the
surrounding neighbarhood.
B. Bui9dings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to ~
produce a functionaf development plan responsive 4o the site, the
surrounding neighbarhaad and uses, and fhe community as a whole.
G. Open space and lanciscaping are both functionaf and aesthetic, aKe
designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site,
ma>timize opporEunities for access and use by the public, provide
adequafe 6uffering between the proposed uses and surrounding
properties, and +ivhen possibie, are integrated with existing open spaGe
and recreation areas.
D. A pedestrian and vehicular circuladion system designed ta pravide safe,
eff'rcient and aestheticaliy pleasing circulatiQn to the site and throughout
tYae development.
E. Enviranmental impacts resulting from the propasal have been identified in
the project's environmental impact repart, if not waived, and a!I necessary
mitigating measures are impiemented as a part of the prapased
cfevelopment plan.
F. Compliance with the Vail Camprehensave Plan and Qther applicable
plans.
~
~
12-9C-1 12-9C-3
~ CHAPTER9
SPECIAL. AND MISCELLANEOUS DISTFIICTS
ARTiCLE G. GENERAL USE (GU) DISTRtCT
SECTION: 12-9C-2: PERMITTED USES: The follaw-
ing uses shall be permitted in
12-9C-1: Purpose #he GU Disfrict:
12-9C-2: Perrnitted Uses
12-9G-3: Canditional Uses Passive autdoor recreation areas, and apen
1 2-9G-4: Accessory Uses space.
12-9G-5: De+relopment Standards
12-9G-6: Additianal Develaprnent Pedestrian and biFce paths. (Qrd. 21(1994)
Standards § 10)
12-9C-3: CONDITIUNA,I. USES:
12-9C-1: PURPOSE: The General Use
District is intended to prouide A. Generally: The foliawing conditional.
si#es fpr public and quasi-pubtic uses uses shall be permi#ted in #he GU
which, becatise of their special characteris- District, subject to issuance of a con-
~ tics, cannot be approprRately regulated by ditional use permit in accardance with
the development standards prescribed far the prowisions of Chapter 16 of this
other zoning districts, and for which devel- Titfe: ~
opment standards especiaily Prescribed for
each particular development propmsal or Churches.
project are necessary to achieve the pvr-
pases prescribed in Section 12-1-2 of #his Equestrian trails.
Title arrd to Frovide far the Rublic wel#are.
The Gsneral Use Distrie# is intencfed to Galf courses.
ensure that pubiic buildings and grounds
and certain types af quasi-pufalic rases per- Helipad for emergency andlar cammu-
mitted in the District are apprapriately locat- nity use.
ed and designed ta meet the needs of resi-
dents and visitars to Vail, to harmonize wiih Hospitals, medical and denta! #aeili-
surrounding uses, and, in the case of lauild- tiss, clinics, rehabilitation centers,
ings and other structures, to ensure ade- clinical pharmacies, and ambulance
quate ligh3, air, open spaces, and other facilities.
arnenities appropriate ta the permitted
types of uses. (Orti. 21(1994) § 10) Majar arcade.
Plant and tree nurseries, and associ-
ated structures, excluding the sale of
~
June 2000
Town of V'ail
12-9C-3 12-9C-5
trees or other nursery products, vided such use 'ts accessary to a park- ~
grown, prorfuced ar made on the pre- ing structure:
mises.
Off9ces.
Public and priuate parks arrd active
autdoor recreation areas, facilities and Restaurants.
uses.
Ski and bike storage facilities.
Public and private schooEs and educa-
tional institutions. Sundries shops.
Public and quasi-public indoor com- Touristlguest service related facili#ies.
munity facility. '
TransiUshuttle services. {Ord. 6(2000)
Public buildings and grounds. § 2: Ord. 21(1994) § 10)
Public parking facilities and structures.
12-9C-4: ACCESS4RY USE,S: The follaw-
Publie #heaters, mee#9ng rooms and ing accessory uses sMall be
canuention facilitEes. permitted in the GU Distric#:
Public touris#/guest service Telated Minor arcade.
facili#ies.
Other uses custamarily incidental and ac-
Pubfic transportation terminals. cessory to permitted or conditianal uses, ~
and necessary far the operation thereof,
Public u#ilities installations inciuding with the exception of buildings. (Ord.
transmission lines and appurtenant 21(1594) § 10)
equipment.
Seasonal structures or uses to accorn- 12-9C-5: DEVELOPMEIATT STANDARDS:
modate educational, recreational ar
cultural activities. A, Prescribed By Planning And En+riron-
rnental Comrnissian: In the General
Ski aifts, tows and runs. Use C3istric#, development s#andards
in each of the fol9owing categories i
Type III employee hausing units shalf be as prescribed by the Planning '
(ENU) as provicied in Chapter 13 of and Enviranmen#al Commission: ~
this Ti#!e. ~
I
t. Lot area and site dimensians. I
Water and sewage treatment plan#s. ,
~
2. Setbacics. ~
B. Proximity To Parking Required: The
following conditional uses shall be 3. Building height.
permitted in accordance with the issu-
ance o# a conditional use permit, prca- 4. Density cantroC.
~
June 2000 '
Town of Vail
12-9C-5 1 c-9C-6
~ 5. Site coverage.
6. Landscaping and site devefoprnent.
7. Parking and Ioading.
B. Reviewed 8y Planning And Environ-
mental Cammissian: Devel4pment
standards shall be proposed by the ~
appiicant as a part of a€ conditianal
use permit application. Site $pecific
development standards shall then be
determined by the Pianning and Envi-
ronmental Cornmission during the
rerriew a# the conditionaE use request
, in accordance widh the provisions of
Chapter 16 of this Title. (Ortf.
21(1954) § 10)
12-9C-6: AI)DITIflNAL DEVELOPh1ENT ~
STANDARDS: Additional regula-
tiQns pertaining ta site development stan-
dard5 and the development of lanct in the
~ Genera! Use District are found in Chapter
14 of this Title, (C7rd. 21(1994) § 10)
. _ I
i ,
~ i
.
June 2000
Tomn of Vail
i
12-8C-1 12-8G-3
CHAf'TER B ~
QPEN SPACE ANa RECREATION DISTRICTS
ARTICLE C. NATURAL AREA PRESERVATIQN (NAP) DiSTR1CT
~
SECTION: no# preclucfe improvernen4 of the naturaE ~
environment by the removaE of noxious
12-8G1: Purpose wesds, deadfall where necessary to protect
12-8C-2: Permitted Uses public safie#y or similar compatible improve-
12-8C-3: Conditianal Uses ments. (flrd. 21(1994) § 10)
1 2-SC-4: Aceessory Uses
' 12-8C-5: Developrnent Standards
12-8C-6: Paricing And Loading 12-8G2. PERMITTED USES: The follvw-
12-8C-7: Additiortal Develapment ing shall be permitted uses in I
Standards the NAP District: i
Nature preserves. (Ord. 21(1994) § 10)
12-8C-1: PURPOSE: The N3turap Area
Preservation District is designed 12-8C-3: C(?NDITI(}NAL U5E5: The
to provide areas which, because of their following conditional uses shalC ~
environmentally sensitive nature or natural be permitted in the IVAP District, subject to
beauty, shall be protected fram encroach- the issuance of a conditionaf use permit in
men# by any building or other improvement, accordanca with the provisions of Chapter
other than those listed in Section 12-SC-2 16 af th4s Title: ~
of this Artiele. The Natural Area Presenra-
tion District is intended to ensure that des- Equestrian tra€Is, used anly to access Na-
ignated lands remain in their naturai state, tionaf fQre$t system lands.
including reclaimed areas, by pratecting
such areas from development and preserv- Interpreti+re nature walks.
ing open space. The Natural Area Preser-
vation Distric# includes lands having valu- Parking, when used in conjunction with a
able wildlife habitat, exceptianal aesthetic permitted or conditianai use. ar flood control value, wetlands, riparian
areas and areas with signfficant environ- Paved and unpaved, nanmotorized, bicycie
mental constraints. Protecting sensitive paths and pedestrian vualkways. ;
natural areas is impartant for maintaining
water quality and aquatic habi#at, preserv- Ficnic tables and informal seating areas.
ing wildlife habitat, flood control, protecting
Wiew earridors, minimizing the risk fram Other uses customarily incidental and ac-
hazard areas, and protecting the naturai cessory to permitteef or conditionaf uses
eharacter of Vail which is so vital ta the and necessary for the operation thereof,
Town's tourist economy. The intent shall
I
~
T'ouvn of Vrsil
12-8C-3 12-SC-7
~ with the exception of buildings. (Qrd. i
21(1994) § 10)
12-8C-4: ACCESS()RY USES: Not appli-
cable in the NAP District. (Ord.
21(1994) § 10) ~
i
12-$C-5: DEVELOPMEPdT STANI?ARDS: Not appPicable in the NAP Dis-
trict. (ord. 21(1994) § 10) ,
12-8C-6: PARKING AND' LOADING:
Parking and foading require-
ments wEll be determined by the Planning
and Enviranrnental Commission during the
review of conditional use reques#s rn accvr-
dance with the provisions of Ghapter 16 of
this Title. (Ord. 21(1994) § 10)
I
12-8C-7: ApDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT I
~ STANDARDS: Actditional regula-
tions pertaineng to site development stan-
dards and the development af land in the
Natural Area Preservation Distrdct are faund i
in Chapter 14, °Suppiemental Regulations", ~
o# this Title. {Ord. 21(1994) § iQ} . ~
s Town ofvdia
07t12/2002 15:21 COUCHLiN ~.323670?162 N0.805 p02
_ Lar~ 11#Ie Cuatwtee OMWV
- YCURorUrAM
Dase: 0648-2002 our Urder Numher: vtM136 _
T'e'nper'ty ASdu^e,. :
LIS MWiT PA$ML
BayerBorrower:
TO BE DETERMC 4ED
SdEet'JUwber:
TtE MO[F(1'TAAN STATES IMEPH0NE AND '!'E[wEGRAPL3 CDNTAN7t, A C(]LOAr1I}O CORF]Ra1TLdN, AS
TO PATiCEL 1
TOWN QF YAII,, A iV1T,JMCf'AL Ct3RPORATT[7dq, 1t5 TO PARCEL 2
[t yaa have asV inqqirtes or regbite f'urthee assfstanc.e, psesse cantact orne vf the nmbera '1daw:
For C:asirg Asaistanre: Far''t'ltlo AsMtonet:
VW] 'l'i'de DepL
Roger Avila
101 S. FaONTAGE atD. W. #203
P.ca. aox 30
vAtz, ca air~~
Pbozw, 970-476-2251,
Fax: 97Q.4r64,.~
EMail: r~I!PItgr-com
Need a msp or d1TreednYS for your upcorning clodmg7 Checie atit Lznsk Tfele's web sita st www.ltgC.tam
iflr directEabs tb laof)ur dQ ofgce ioe aiiaxs.
ETiAd(AIMCF1171EMS
~an~lion ~r $1?5. 4i
TWA,. 5~.75 . QCI ~
Takm a=sac't Z`HANS Yi3U F0'R Yo;7H C}RIIBB!
Attachment; D
e7/1212202 i5;21 COUGHLIN y3036797162 NG.=806 1;03
rfam I-df1u IiTIe , -v:7,rao
.f i- aa a411 Luu4 4u: ji: ai F4ri NiII I rI~r. ? Us J.U
, ~ .
Cb1cma Iltie rTisl7mce CompRTty AzTA coMrrrTMENr -
Our arder No. VC272&36
Sehee[ule A Cuak Re[.:
Prnpe.rky Address;
U$ WWT F.4RCG7.
1. Emective Aate: Apr1i 26, 21101 at 5:04 P. K
2. Aalicy to Ie Lssmd, snd FtQpased Inaured:
WprmiffloA Btseder
Proposed ftmmed:
'r'O BE []MAMIv"E1~
~
~
~
3. 'f'tto cstate ar "reAt in the tend described ar referred kn 9n thiB Cmomifmvnk eod coVereei tlerein is:
A Fee Sft*e
4. 'fitle tv tlse estate or iatescst covetxd hftdn 19 at tHe effc+cttna date hercat vesttd iti:
T13E MOUNTAiN 4eTATES M"Hf}NS.1ND TIIM~MAFE CQNYArIY, A Ct]IAliAl74 CQRYGRt'I70N, AS '1'O P'ARC'hL l
TOWN UF VAIC., A.1tiILJMCIPAL COMRt7C0N, hS TO PARCEL z
S. The 1mnd reiermd ta iin tlkis Commitiuent !s desGribed as to.llavs:
M ATTACH= P+#GW S) 1?0RLEGAL D&SCRiFITON
~
~
.
07/12{2002 15:21 CCUGHLiN T 3036707162 hi0.806 W4
~
OL1C QCdEI' NG. Vl3724M
~MALCIE 'FMCN .
PARCEI. Z
a TItACT ok' F.,A:VD YN THE SOYnlWAST OI'v1E-Qo:ARTER, SDiJT'HEAST od"&QUARTER, $E CI'toN 6,
TOWNSHiP 5 5C?it]TH, RANGE 00 WFST OF'THE GTH P.lwi.y EAGLE CUT3NTYa COLORAUO, PiY(3IiS
PAR'I't~CUL.A?RLY i]ESCMEA AS F'O'LLt7WS;
HEG'ItVN[NG AT jti .POIlYT SNNG 1190.20 nWi" NOIi'I'H 36 DEaGRFFS Ql NMUIES ZS SECaii)9
WEST F~' ?M TM $ -cQUrfLrA ST CQM4E%1.' OF SEC`::"L`N 6, T'o 1AiN'S LW 3$tXJix~t NA ?aGN 80 Sgr f3F
THE GM P.rvi.; THENCE NORTH t]o DEGRF~"i5 aa MN'UIW 180.11 FEET, TIIENCE NORT'H 89
I)EGRM 34 :rifVl'A'S WF.5T 143,67 FU'C; ?`FIENrCE SQU'I°EF da DWREES 09 MNF3'I'F,S WFST
107.00 FEE'['; TFD "A1{',E St7il`M 26 DEGRM 17 119'tNUIES'4M~'JST 32.25 FE~+.'rs THENCF, Si]t3'Fii
83 TlEGAM 30 &IIIVUTKS WFST 120.40 FM; '1I3HNCE 54tJ'I73 36 iIEGREES 23 :4IINCJ'I'E'S 3(
5~NDS RYEST ;5,24 MT; `IT$ENG'F SOLITR 83 I7Er`REES 36,MIIqUM 30 5W(7ND5EAST
411.93 FEW rO IM Ponvr oF BEGNNNG, cou3vTY cF FAGLE, sTATE OF cOWR?M
TC1GETFUR V4?I'x! AN EASENIEIV'C FUR ACCESS TO A:Vp EGRIOS FRt?M THE ABQVE-UESCItISED
TRALT BY P~~i TRLAN, VEWCL7L.AR, AND MU'FUR TRAMC, ,FOR A=A'l. AND BUR=
'I'EI.~'.PHO:VF, ANII MVCTRiC I'OWER IirM AND Vilit BL7Rl~.+'C~ WATER, SE'VF'M GAS, AND QTF=
UTII.MES TO SA]D "YRACT QVER A,1vD ACR(kSS 7HEF()L1r..C?WING DESCRXED PRSJPER'i"Y, To
wTT;
ATRACT OF LAND TN THE Sc]Z1THEA S'i` oTiFQUART'KR, SC)[JTBE.AST ON&QUARTLR, SDCIY"q 6,
TOWNS'FIIP 5 5QI37H, R4NGE SO WWI' CW THE 6'I'H P.M., Ek{'L$ CUiJr"T, C£]T.C)liADO, MJRE ~
PARZTG'i7LARI.Y ijESCRMED A?5 FDI,LQWS:
BEtR41NNGAT' aPoAVT SRiNG E170.20 YETi' NoRTt3 36 DEGXWo11+MUTB5 2S 5ECVND x
WEST FROM THE 5;3VT+3F'rAS'T CORNER 07 HECMQN 6, 'IoV4NSh'IP 5 SO[}TR, &ANtZ 80 WiSL' 07
THE 6TH TEENcE sc»rTH oo pECIRM~s 00 KrrcrM 40.25 PUT; THErrc~ NURTU 83
DEGitZES 36 NU[+Itl"t" 34 SECf3TwTAS WF.ST 332.48 F&ET; TtENCR Sf7T7TH E5 DEGNM 49
MINUTES wEs'F 8i1.I8 FM 'LO THE tvORTfi I,IGET OF wAY LM aF O"''i'ERSTA7'E 70; 'i'EN QCE
syOl+lTH 74 D~gS 21,lM4Tl'T'F9 35 WC(]NDS WM 40.00 FgET' AY'.ONC TIM NQRTU AMU r QE
°wAY x.Br-E or uvtERsTArE 7Q; THEva NORTH is nEcRns 49Naavums RAn mza Fm r;
'rSENCE sOUT3 8:] DWPXES 56 MnvC1TES 30 sECOvDS EA5T 41i.93 F=V 'rO THE POtrr'r OR
BEGNNING, CE]iJ14TY Clr F.A€xIF, SI"A'i"E [3F COI.URttIfU.
NCTFc THE 131NAi. POLIC'f D()E51VOT II+T :i,NYWAY GWAU~E ClJL IlVBUAE THE DIMENSIONB
OF THE AB(lVE DE5C:R18N) LAi1TDj ZEE LMAL RISCRWrM IS ISERiYED FMM `IFI$ CHA34 QF
TTTl.E A1r1D C3ATI..Y AIV ACCURATE SL3R'4EY CAN DrrERMM '1M U134EN&IC}N8,
PARCF.L Z
A 7RAC"`x' OF LANI) IN '1"HE Sf3UTH HA.LF OF 'IM 50UT3E~~'~ST Q[1ARM SEC'nt]rT 6,
TUWNSW 5 SOC71H, UNGE $G WE3"T OYt TIM 6TH P'RINCiPAL kEMMN, F,AGLE COUPiT]',
CtiLOaApq MCMT, PARTYCC7L4L-Y pSSCRLA6D A5 k`ULLOWS:
aEGiNKiNGAT A MLliNT THA'T LS N QQ DSGRM 23 MFIVJTFS 16 SECMnB W A,R1STANGT CF
696.60 FEET F%]M TFS SC![TTlMASi' +GY)RNER OF SECxfQ`N b, TOt'YPiSHIP 5 S[?U'i'H, RANGE 10
WFSI' OF THE 6TH PRINC[PAL MML17LtN, BEII'VG-TAE 'CRM PMT 4F B9G04NIiYQ'
AIS[)_ BELNG A PUYX"T OV THE NORTMY.Y RI'aGHT OF WAY OF Lti'3ERSTAfi9 70;
~
THEiN C'E N OQ DEC;MS 23 MIlVI3'1ES 16 SECOhiA5 W RY.ONG TM F.AST LM OF SAEID SECr:0N
-
07/1212302 15:21 COUGHLIN = 303b?27162 . , Nu.b)J4
.•..a. .wv i. .e I I L4 JM1 LIlt/G .u..Y.4.11 ?1KF M1/1 1'rCyL77 GI 1V
. . " . . . ~/4r Qr~r NQ. Y4~724
6.flrAi.fE761'1T11VN
6 A I3ISTAlYCE C)E` 633.40 'T; .
THENCE N 89 nI+GRffi 27 tUNUrMS 215ECON'DS Vlr A C7ISTANCE OF ?633, 76 bTM TO A
POlN'x OV "IM P-AST $Q[.TT+JDARY LINE 017 VAI,JPOTATC7 PATG'H FI£,ING,
THE1'CE 5 UO MrRUS 07 i'4~i UM 12 SEC€)NUS F ALONG SAIU F,A5T B43UNDARY LM A
DISTANCE OF 35l..21 FEET T'U A FQINT IlN A GTJA'YFL, SAID CLIRYE AESO BENG DN TIM
. N ORTHEALY SW M OF WAY OF INMMATF 70;
THEYC£ ALON.~'.T SAID N[]RTEWJtL'Y A[GHT OF WAY c?N TF3E FUi.I.QWINCr 8 COCJRSE&
1? A DI.STNA(E a F 204.62 F'E~."i' AL.OlVG T$E AitC OF ACl.RYE TD 'IEIE IUM3'i", SAM CtdAVE
HAVMG A CEAtT:11I. AItiGLE (lF i3Z DEGRM-5& KNU7'ES 189WClNDS, A AADDNS OF 399D.Q
FEET, A?VII A CHOAD BEAMGN I$ L1EGREPS 3I ,NINU'T'ES 14 SECONDS E A I}ISI'ANCE CF
204.60 FEET;
Z) iV SQ DF.~'rREES 0 141INCTTL+S 06 SECflNI]S F Ar. T3[STANt'E O$ Z11.80 MT;
33 N 84 iaEGAM 59 MRVLD'i'PS 50 SELYlNIlS E A DISTANGT C1)t'339.'TQ t,EE7';
4) s 79 DEcRYXS:~6 SUrnrtJrFs 28 sECnNus B a nZTNcE OF 42a.40 FEEr; .
S) S 64 DEt'i .ES .'S MCTiTTES 21 SEMNC)S k A DISTANC'E QB m.20 FEET;
6} S 74 UEJM~:',1. MIIV'UMES 35 SECUNDS EA i]JSTANCE OF 7A4.70 MEET;
7) 5 83 DF,G1O'S 36 MINUTES 29 SCONDS $A DiSTAl'dC;E Of 926.311 FEE'T';
8} S71 DfiGRW:3 hIIMU'I73.'S 45 SECONDS E A DiSTANCE UF 194. LO b'F= TR} THL 'Y'WE
YvLNT OF BEGIIVNING, CaUNTY OF FAGLX STATE O'8 CaLORAna.
EXCWT'Tf3AT Pi7ER"ITON t}~'i L.AND DESCRiBEri IN WAkMA~+3T1` l3MM, nCSPTII7N 114010, 40UK
219, PAGE 419, FQ E#] QB FIECURD LN TFM i1MCE {)F CLERK AND RE.Ca]WER OF FAGLE
CUi7NT1', C(3LQRrlDQ
N[7TE7 TFIE FlNAi. PCJY.ICY I3CffS NU7' 1N ANY WAY GUQIRANTEE OR INSURE THE DIi4M5IDNS
OF TIiB A$D'V'E DI?SCROEI3 LANp, TnE ~'~eR.[.DE5CMFTMN I5 DERW$}7 BRUM T~l& C'fiet?
TnIZ AND oNLY A.N AGCURATE SURVEY CAN AETMN'lINE TEE r1IM1ENSLQt?iS
/12l2002 15:2,i CU'~GHL1~1 = S0J6i07152.•- Nu.dU~ VDC
~7 .SV.HLJ11~~ ~ . 1r ?
1 uV? LiNIM I 1. : T~ Y-V JM41 4l/4L lU. J~.. ,~Z rfifl mN 1
ALTA C[?MMCTMENT
9~*slute B - SetElbn 3
(Regulrements) OUr t}tsler No. V 072$35
'I'he taHovQirig ari ft rrsluireuwsts Co be complied with:
lfem (a) Paymemt w or lor tte sr~ouurt o't the V=tors or mortagots of the i1ug catxaitleratkn [or tW e~tiW+sr
in* l'est 6n he issm'eat.
Pwm {hl P^ap:r !rsst zssesst(s) arjagm lwlm esta:e ur tnletest da be irouatvd mmt be extmtesi Nd dwy f]ed Por r~c.otsi,
tn-wit:
IWta (c) Pa9rmitt at ,dl W=, cWges or assessrrertts levied wA suessed agwmt the su6ject preaaf.aes w) tch arn d;e
€ud pspabie.
IM17 t4J Additionai r:quftewnss, tf aiy dSsdosed betow:
TM G'Qs~TrrDT 19 FQR, L%MRMATLON CNLY, AND NO YO'.IC7f WILL BE ML1SD
F[IR£UA NT HRU70.
~
~
0?i12/2002 15:21 COLGFL-1t4 x:3036707152 ;403azsi,ee ~ s,
,+Ntl iVUL J.V+ 31. ?i /WI IYtY I F ljC ! 41 L#J
~ ' . . , _ . . A LT Ai C4 it1[ tMI T" XE N T , . - . . . Schedale B • 5ection ~
(ExcepfAox?s) Mr order Nu. V C272436
'Che poiicy or polfztes Eo 1Se Lesued v?dll contaln errceptlons w the folt+aWlng tt111ess fhe same gre dispmd
ai to the sufiLsYaetion ot t?ie Campany:
1. RigbLft or rlaiM ni XarHes itt pouessEan nvt ehown bp ihe pubde reawrds.
2. Eas¢xnenls, or c1aE= o[ emeranM, nac shown by ft public reanMs. .
21. 13tsere;sancie4, ec+ndf#cts in batnttbsg flnes, sfwftage tn ana, eTcroachtnenb, mM ay faets whlch aftrzEi:t settPey axGd
bvpeetlon at ft preiraseg wauld dWelose end wh1ch are tsot shown 1ay the pu"fc recqrtW,
4, AM E1eq or H.gft La ii lleT, far gervim, l,abor or trsamxial th*retofore or Wreefter f'wmislkd, WqXM4 bq? 18w mid
nat:sluovm by ftpdAic rmrds.
5. Defecfa, liem, emm'brattcee, advesse e1aims or vtber rnauaeers, ii suW, tmvted, Owt appen'iM in ft pqi?liE rocne* or
attacWmg mthwqoem ra tha ettIcdve dm hereof txrt prior ta the daue Me propbwd 3tssured aaq[dIW ot te :Oet! toi^
matue ft estate or bt~rest or nsartgage t}x-mn caPexred by shis Catrntidimnt
6. Tarteg at specdW amm smexdg wtdch am 7sat shOVvn n exlsft 1i€w by the publi¢ remard9.0 ft T!'ee?smeWs ot[fce.
14ertts foC zmpadd vv4ie r eR1d sewer ehurges, iL aal..
3. Ill amo0n' o'SC b1#t1C3' 8PDlity Will E* s11ItE'CCt t'A ShC tEa1'tgvvv KOV, 31Attd I1 smtLaii J. i1f .r1ChPxbgG Bh.=4
9. MCU7 OF PRi7FMTOR [lB AVMV OR 1,013H TO EfTRAGT AND REMO'VE M URE
iM EMCAi SHDY;LD 'T'HE S#ME $E FOL'ND TO PENSi'AA.'IE OR IiV'Mi:~'ECT T'HE FREKWU;
AS RESERVED IN UtiT= 5rATM PAMT RSCORiiB[3 IMAY ?a, 19941 It+1 POUK 4B AT
PAGE 503.
10. JSGHT UF'WAY IrDli DrrCMIKS t]A ChIVALS CCrNSTRL3CTED $Y'I'HE AL)'IHOIUTY [)F THE
uPr7rm sTo3TEs AS REaRV8L1 iN L1x+]CITEt7 STAM PA"MT RLCflRI}ED MAY 24y 1904r
TN 000K 49 AT FAG E 503.
11, WaTZaAND wATEEL RDMTS, nr'(M nNn ntrc]3 RuGMS. .
12. RiGBT tYF WAY 40 xWI' IP7 WzDTH A5 R6SCRIDSU iN CoNDF.wA'TLON TOA FIGHT OF WAY
AFYARDED T'D THE ITNiT`W STATES OF AMfiRICA IN I'iVSM11'1E[Y'i' RECURI]FA AY3GUST 1$,
L"5 N 1BOQK 116 A'f PAGE 349.
13. EiGH'I OF"WAY AS GFAi?1'IT,La TO THE STA°I'E OF CMORAUt3 II+i PiSTKUP4fSNT RECCWBD
3LWE 8, 1940 G~t BCXIK 127 Afi PAGE 466.
14. RIGHT 4F WAY A8 i:R4NTED TO T'UE F[SMTNG LC7MBER AND MMWA1VTIi.E 'COllWANX' IN
07/12/2O02 15:c1 COUGHLIN - 3056707162 .~~~a4~eG Nu•8ub ~ a~~, ~..-.w+• ir• ! 1 LV +ril 4WU6 i4Jf.Jl NN MLI IIwsC LT V'i ,y{f
ALrA caMMrTXENT..--.._ . _ . ~
. sdtaduie B • secolon z
(EccxAtionv) Our Qrder Na. Y :273436
The policy at poUci,es to 1w- issued will contaln exccptlons tu the Tailowirig lk[nlese the sanr- are dLtposed
of bv khe satia[act#n,n oi the comparyy:
1NM-KMEl*iT REC"URI1Fp JANUARY 13, 1943 1'AT B04K 1:7 AT PAGE $63.
15. F.IGHT OF WAY &A,SENtENT A9 Clk"':'EII ?'O GAS ~A Cn-iT= tyVC. LN Ra7S'I'RL'NWqT
RFMRt]ED WORIfARY 17, 1966 IN BaoK 193 ar PAGE 149 AND IN H[3aK 192 AT P.aGE
161 AND AECUFCUFD MARCH 9, 19b6 IN HOOK 173 AT PAG'E 203 AIVD AT PACE ZOJ'.
16. EASEWNT AS GR1NT1M TCy YAIL 'VYA'fE0.AN-0 SANTCATLON DM1trC'I' IN TN5TAUMg31''T
REC'aDRDED AiPRi. 7, 1966 IN HQOK I92 AT PAGB 365.
17. ZERNI$, CDNDT1,"kb;VS AND FR4vL5w3v5 c)F Nt7N~EXcLUSTVE LJNDfiRGxGUND RYGHT OF yVAY
EASE&W6N,T A8 GR+iN'TEt? TO Hi?LY CROS5 FLUCC)UC AaSOCIATION, LNC. REC8RDEI) JM
OS, L994 IC! BOQK bQ A'I' PACxE 3U.
~
1& WLS'1NG LFAMS ekNU TENANCUES-
~
~
¦ .w~.. .i..~~.,..~~.r..i
f .
07t12/2002 15:21 CpUGV-{LIN 4 3036707Z&2 NU.bri6
i;a03&2~1tB5 u+o: i ~
lU
~ TrAtYD fiITLE GL'Ai3ANTEB COMPANY
DISC'LOSURE STATEMgN'I5 1Vate: PMMMt fO t:RS ln.ll-l~Z, ato1lee is h+eMhy given tbab
A) 'Cfm srt't*cs ree! PtvrPers,j' ruaY !se taesird in s spxcial twdng +lisMcL
B} A Q;#ittcste a1' Tues Duee IWtg eaeh cwdng jarlsdlct9on tW be okWned itqm ft Cotmq
3'reamates amfwrftad agaent
C1 'Ile 9ntjorrrmtia,i mgandhgqe,cfsl d9.sMcrs arW trie twamdartes oesuch dLsnlcts my be obtdredDota
the BaaH og CoaM Comnlssloners, the Caiadqr Clerk and 1Reconder, oc the Cnunly Assessar.
Note: EtYaclive Sep;esnbrx 1, 1999, CR9 30-10406 eeores ituit xU dncumnb tscealved for mwtdbrg or fi!lleg
i~ Lht 4detk ovi rerlr~~~ oM ce GJWt ..t?ntain a iop margin af xt lea9t ane iwlt od a feTt, r'tghk and boUrRt
rzuVn of at [eugt niie ha1f nf an inch. Tbe rterk aM meamler nmy teitsse to t+eotil ar Ifle ow darmnent ttmt
daes mt mntac,n, exe9ept Mt n,e "mmnS ror the cop Irartn OaJl aat aqoy to dr,cca,r,enW miing ialm
oa wWh qrace ia puvfc4ed ror.irecortftg ar fdlit:g hd4uftnadran at ft Wp nagln of Itie documML
ZVo#a: Calar-adc? Aixlf-sion of Insumme FttgWaNa»s 3-5-1, Fncagroph C ot At#iele YII reyulm dist "UMF
dtlc cmFky sW tae nsspcrsftsie for el17tsMrs vs^Mch appear o[ record p1ee to t}e Ortt' aP eer-nr;lIrg
wt+efiever the We erlitr cotYtucb ft closing snd ts eesponviWe iar recardlnig crrfllfbg of 1egal
dacirmtrw t+cstl t'ng Crysm ttfe draamactian wFnieh wm closaed":.PrxsPidea !twtF..and 'I'ide Guarantee
C,atxqaW crrnduds tie clasing of ttle ituured 0=sattion atW is tesparMb2e Car wCOltOrzg the
legaF d=mM ftni ttw tmmacttnn, eatce~pdon ?wioker 5~%ill ant appear an ft Owmea Title
Pa[.acy aid u Gend,eas Pality wriets 1sque,tL
Nlate: Affltr~w mixhatAc' 9 lier pc4r6ectlan far t?we Owner mey be *verflable (typicallg 63' 44edop
aL Exception tza. 4 a1' Scbechiit H, Secdpn 2 ot the Cupun{tmww trarn fhe Owne?s Pl1icy 6a be
Lnied) upt3R Carapd8w2 W11f1 ft YQII64Pi2lg mIISIt10ns:
A) ll7G lani{ desCdbel tn S$hEdW$ A Qf ft CAimd'kmn[ 11l114t bC 8 3~~e Usni'~ LY3fS1Cm! 'WNCh
ixocludes a coqd.opilndmn ar towWwase taWL
B) Nn kb4r ns rrmlr.i'4fs !omt iecn tlardsttesi by mectattcs or mqOeHa!•raeu ivr pieposw of
couslructicii an tIZ )ax# deseWed In SchedWe A ot tlhL3i Casomlprjetst K+it3du tW past 5 tsmtuhs.
C) 27te LbnWBOY mnA mcei9e an appeapr'saw S£fldavlk 3fs40MM14ilig ft CarqQnaiy WwTISi'lDI-$1ed
meeWC`9 aitd It!€!f2SfA1-fmW s Sie3i9.
Q) "W G07ww 11=sf rRrCCive paymlit d' ft 8ppTppriA* P"traiLR7'l.
F~ ri tfere hae been cumft=ltatt, irsqarvPemeM ar rrojar repaits wwdeitakea on 11v ]xaPeytp tn be Poti~rtsd
'wifltn six mondo rular to t#e D$Le af the iCnmttdlmernt, tAe mpdremnts to flhwa coV+eMe
far uaxcotnled fie7is wflI iiacludea dUelaeurn of ceetd?s caeettuetlon irturnidarr Smocla3 lnormuffli
as to ft se11er, tbc to3ida 8ud or the Co11tutoC; pqtnent af the app+RptWe pwMlaq tt1d~y
execze4 1ude=11ty AgmeimM satishkctocy tn %S co'aVo3y, mrd, wq addiflnnW reorcuerb
a~mt~p' be ne~cess~P 6dber ao ex[ar~ats at the aivresa~d 3~'orina4lon ty tl~e Canrp~• .
Na eewt&ge will he given uatder aaq dr+eianswsccs tarr labor vr rnmWiled far whicti the fUsu¢+ed
tta5 conWaetetl for or a,g[eed ttt }ay.
NeLe; Ptxsuat to C&! 10-11•1.23, nollee !s hmby giPeb:
A) That tlwre fs recottled evide= ttsat a mineraJ catau M'm be= severed, lsmerl, or oOwttivisc
conveybd ftn ft smfsCe es{ate aM itmt @tere ts s suWkudal lilr,elihaard drat a tMad Ptty
hDld9 8pme ur all i]temt tIi 41l, $Rar aWw Etdte78i9, Ol' @CO[h1tr11a1 ene[U in t#!e pOpettyi and
'i71at sisch mMtpl eslete 7'M hclmde die Hght to cnler snd use du }xoperty WiftUt de
RrPsce awlte' a pe:mmilom
This rsutice appies to cwmr's patiey tarnmitsnems camaitdng a niinexai sevetarice insteutne»t
acepaa% nr excepaolsf 1n Scheiiuie H, 5ecfian S.
~ Notldn,g herein enmb ed wlll be deemed to Oblfgate Qw eompmy M pmvide aM Ot ft eaveseges
nerenetl W Feemin untea ft sbove cancitiom ace tWiy saWed.
~ _
07r12J2%02 i5:21 COL'GrLiN 7 3036707162 Nu.bo6
. _ _ ,
I
• Jariqr NarIcE OF PRivAcr poLrCx
Fldelity Nalioue,l Mtmnwla3 Group ix[ Curnpotde91C4sicage Title Insus'ance Compsty Und ,
TAnd Title Gro~:: t;~i~c Compeny
J131y 1, 2001
pectada~s a£ G~rda,p's cvn,npuwr~ m~d Ihe~tmpem9 or qp~11~~ fedEr3U aa~d
:YK ~'e helieve tlmt ~ you awae o[ haw we t~e your roc~tv c petsarml "uttattt~d~~x C~esavaE
k whom it is cltsclase wltt farm the basls tar a r~1aQotahip of tnmt F~etw~e~cn vs aqu! ilee p~atdfc
r~e. Fldvacy SWenaertt pravides rhat cxplanacian. We ie.serve the rfgt% w ehange tiis Privi icy
Stmtmxnt Ytatn ftoe tn drne wnMtent with applieabJe Ov44y lavvt.
In the aauist oP aaw bus9ti,sA we may cnIiect Persana! lnfar'madon akoqt you fram tie lollovqingsoircw.
~ From awM1cs#oio ar niner famm we metve 1'rom an or your an.,orized reprvse iMOve;
~ Fram ;poiw aww 3stions witis, ar Pmm ft servlce+ ng periarrazsl try, us, aur effliiaWs, or o11w0;
FCOtrc atw lamutt web sfCes;
From the pubdr records rrsaintatrad by govcrrrmentx! etitfUvs khat we eiitzer otta1'a dtiftO itvm am
engtkst OI ttrnri OF.1K affilWY5 AC 4d1eL9; vrid
~ FCOin cDmi7mRZ' )fr fltlwl tepUl1917g ap1Lies.
Oruus Po}icic.s Regardixg the Protecttau af the Conticientialttg astd SecutiCy o[Yot'r FkrgautT InfortumtiOn
1'Ve motawn a~~cal, o1eetta~c an! pir~acerhall sdc~ ta grnfectyota~ Pcrsoasi ItrEa~an fkam urm ~adzed
scC~e.ss nr lntn~On. ~1Fe Iftfndt aee~a h? thc ~''er.~vr~al ~it~lorroatlan nnty to thnse oye~5 ~ neod Acch accr.~s ih
Q,9
oomwcaon wim pmvf ting prodtzett nr services t,a you or Por Ather legitimate bwstne= pnupvses~
Our Palicles attd Pacclrgs ltegpsding the Shsdng o€ Yaur Persanal iniarsnadon
We tro,q stsare yaur fi.rsonM IMtmtlnn ivllh aur amIiatea, such as ittsutance cotqxdw, agem, ard athT mRi
eslut sef3lesnertt.sett":e prvvidexs. V?!e alse mW disclose yaur Peraona( Infortmtipte
e F
° ta agexb, haa1ien! or r~p~se~fv~s to pmvlde you witn servicts pflu tave ccq~oed;
w Urd-party oan taclors or service peo7viders wlw provl& sergic" or }aerfbrm rnaAieting or aftr ~
fsmcdam vt? oar 13r'tmi[, wd .
° ta others wi3h *ham yre eruer Ctnbo joirt marioeiing agxeerrnus for produets orservkes ttaat we believc ,yap
mq Mid of 3ntensl.
In asWttinn, 3ve wilf 04tase yaur P2CS4ud h[arntalinn svhen you dlrect or glve +o permfssivnh wbm we sr: requbltd
ay iaw ta do s4, ar whett we suqect ftaWulent or ceiminat ectivlNes. We aLia MW diaC3ase yOtc- PMts7w!
7r,farr+oat~an w~ten aft~erwise pettr~ii~ bg appJ#~ priv #x~va se~ch a~, far escatr~e, ~r~ ditck~ iS:~
~o rtiv
co eeoe+ca ow dghts mWng att oY my agreernwt, bmmmc nn ar re7ttiavwfdp with you
[?ne af the 9t~rt~t n~ns[bWtles a[ some ni our ~91#atcd cu~~ is to record d~une»#s in Oe~c
drill3ai]~ 8~E1 dwmterLs twq sanlain yaur Peesamoi Tt:farm,adafl.
Right eo Access'Yaur Fersona! Ytformatiaa and Abi#ity ta Carrectimrs (7r Rquest Changs [rir D-ti stion
Certaun sWtw sawd you Qie righl to access yaur Fersanei Lndarrtmion " imder eertgjl drOMtMIUM, ta :11d aut
po whoeq 9our P'enua1 bs#orniagnn hw been dLiclased, ,1lso cetttM soaws edtard" ft dght tv mqpt,4t
coeTectfan, mwndmienc or detetlon of yaur Feraoral IKori~an We reseive ft tfgK wlore perwlUd by 9wr, m
dlaMr a reszsortal3ae U+e 'Gn cover the cwW txuun*d 1'n tesFmWIM b auch seguesN.
AlI m-guest suMWtied to the fidPlity Ai'ioona! Fineotxia! Grorp a! Ceitpw*slChicaga 'nfie IMtwme tbtst~arw
4alt bc in writinl; and detlveovd ta dhe fo1loNftg eddr*wc
PriS+sty Campliaace UtdceC
MQeNty 1Vaia1om.l FttaaWai, bm
4050 Cadle Iteal, SiAte ZZA
SanCa Babas, CA 93110
s Muttiple Prndu+cts ar 5ervlces
Tr we pxtrvide paa r91tlt inore Um ane [9rtamSaiptnduct mr veevfce, you my reeefve rnare ttm am priva?sY modce
fmm us. We apaiag!!zr 1'or ml immFrerderrce tlAs mal cme Ynp.
ftsn
. ~ r.~~ ~.~~n • rr ~rr..ru
~idc~ l~ C~~,t,~ ~ • Z~
Fred G. Steingraber Re4ocable `Frust ' Greenwich Rea9ty Noldmgs LLC Seqtie] Gapita] Corp.
615 i~'~"arw-ick Road 10$2 Riva Glen 737N. N(ichigan Avenue #2I50
Kenifworth, IL 60043 Vail, CO $1657 Chicago, iL 60611
-0 0530 1001 &210105301002 210105301003 210105341004
Ronaid & Kristine Erickspii Lee & Charlene Raymond Qscar Tang
5123 Lake Ridge ltoad 4642 lvteadowood Road 600 - Sr', Avenue
Minneapalis, 1VIN 55436 Dallas, TX 75224 New York, t»1`t' 14020
216105301005 210105301006 2101053301047
Franco D'Agostina Rajendra & Neera Sinah BJ4m Bpraen
84$ Srickell Averaue 9$10 i&Ol Belle Rive Terrace Founders Financial Center
Miami, FL 3313 ] Alexandria, VA 22309 2930 E Third Avenue
Denver, CO 80206
210105301008 210105301009 210!05301 n i p
J. Richard & Gay Steadman Rose F. Gillett Revocable "C'rus# SC MUUnEain Top LLC
cFO Flynn Steadrnan 1; 15 Spraddle Creek Raad 485 Madison Avenue
6161 S. Bostoii Cir Vail' CC? $1657 24"' Floar
Enalewood; CO 80111 New York, NY 10022 ,
2!ntn~^njnij 210105301012 220105301013
William & Julie Esrey Spraddle Creek Estates I'vlaintenance
2624 Verona Road 1221 BrickSll Avenue Solar Vail
Miami, FL 33131 Sannenalp I'roperties Inc.
Mission Hi3ls, KS 6620$ 20 Vail Road
40 105301014 210105301015,16,17,18 Vail, CO 81657
Evergreen Lodge at S/ail Ltd USA, Sec. ofAg., U5 Farest Service
250 S. Fronta-e Road `T'own oti Vail C/o WEtite River National Forest
Vail, CO 81~~7 75 S. Frontage Road p4st Office Box 948
Vail, Cd 8 1b57 i
210106401020 Crlenwood Springs, CQ 81602
I
Vail internationa]
_a00 ~ Lionshe~d Cirele Calorad~r Dept. af Transportation Mr. Jim Yates
OFfce of Public Inforrr~ation 914 Snra~tdle,jCreek R.oad
' 42U t E; F~Fkaiisas Avenue Vail, Cd 81657
210106402057 I]enver, Gt7 84222
~
Attachment: E
THIS lTEM MAY AFFEGT YOUR P'ROPERTY
PUBLIC NOT1CE .
NCITICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that #he F'lanning and Environmentai Cammission of the Town of ~
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 0# the Municipal Code of #he
Town of Vail on August 12, 2002, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In ,
cansideratian of:
A requast for a variance frorn Section 12-68-6 (Setbacks), Vail Town Code, to allow for a "garage eneroachment in the rear setback, 9acated at 5167 Gare Cirele/Lot 12, Block 3, Bighom
Subdivision 5th Addition.
Applicartt: Ralland S. Hamelin
Planner: N1att Gannett
A request for afinal review and recommendatians af #he following applications rela#ed to the
praposed redevelopment of the Vail Maun#airr School:
1) A request for a recammendatian to the Vai! Town Council to rezone 3010 Booth Falls
RoadfLot 11, Black 2, Vaii Viilage 12`h Filing from Two-Famify Residentiaf to Genera!
Use;
2} A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council ta Zone Lot 12, B1ack 2,
Vail Vi]lage 12th FiGng to General Use, The northern portion af this lot is zoned
Agriculture Op+en Space;
3} A request for a recorrirrmendation ta the Vail Ta+nm Council to rezone Tract C, Block 1,
Uaif Village 12 th Filing from Two-Famiiy R€sidential ta General Use; "
4) A request for a recommendation to amend the official Tawn of Vail Land Use Map for
Traet C, Block 1, Vail Village 12'h Filing from Low Density Residential to PublicfSemr-
Pubric;
5) A request for an arrtendment to the previously approved development plan and a new ~
cond"rtional use permit for a private educational institution and an actiue outdoar
recrea#ion area on 3010 Saath Falls Road/Lot 11, B@ock 2, Vail ViIlage 'l24h Filing arod
3160 N. Fron#age Road Eastl Loi 12, Black 2, Vail Vil4age 12'' Fiking;
6) A request for a conditional use permit to allow for the canstructiQn of eight Type lal
EHUs Iocated an Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12t' Filing;
7) A request for a for a conclitional use permit to allow for temparary rnodular classroom
s#ructures located at 3160 N. Frontage Rd. Eas#I a part of Laf 12, Block 2, Vaif 1lillage
12 Ih Filing; 8} A, request for a recommendaticin to the Vail Town Councii Ca madify the official Town
Vaii i UCkidil-~lcltdit~ Mn~ tv iituiGaia aj.i~iiCiued ioiiiigc3iloli for 3160 N. rl"GntagE~'
. ~J) A request for a major subdivision in aceordance with Title 13, Chapter 3, Vail Town
Cocle, and setting forth detaiis in regards thereto, iacated at Lots 11 and 12, Bfock 2,
Vail Village 12`h Filing and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12t' Filing.
Applicant: VaiC Mountain Schael, representecC by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Russ Forrest
A request for a minor amendrnent to 5pecial Develnpnment aistrict No. B, ta a11ow for ara expansion
of comrnerciai uses inta comarron area, located at 123 S. Frantage Rd, WestlLots NI,N, &U, Vail I
Village 1st Filing. j
Applicant: Club Chelsea, represented by JMP Architects
Pianner: Vllarren Campbell
~
~
7TVWN OF VAIL
~
A request for a final review of a final plat for a major subdivision; a request for a final review of a
conditional use permit ta alfOw for a priuate educational institution and development pfan apprc+val
~ to construct employee housing; and seffing for#h details in regards thereta, focated at the site
knawn as "Mauntain Bell"lan unplatted piece of property, located at 160 N. Frontage Rd.lto be
platted as L.ot 7, Middle Cree4c subdivi5ion.
Applicant: Vail Local Housing Authority, represented 6y Cidell Architects
P9anner: A1lison Ochs A request for a conditional use perrnit, to aIlow for a public utieity instalfafion, located at the East Vail Water Tankq 5004 Snowshae Lane/Summer Recreational Area, Vail Meadows Filing 1.
Applicant: 7own of Vail
Planner: Bil[ Gibson
A request for a reccammendation tv #tte Vail Town Cauncil #o of an amendment to Section 12-7A-7
(He+ght), Vail Tawn Code, to increase the maxim+um alCowable bui9ding height in the Public
Accommcadation Zone District.
Applicant: Bob Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: Gearge Ruther
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public irrspectian during
regu[ar office hours in the project planner's office, iocated at the Town af Vail Community
devefopment Departrnent, 75 South Frontage Raad. T'he public is invited to attend praject orienkation
and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development
~ Department. Please cafi 479-2138 for information.
Sign language in#erpretation availabfe upon request with 24_hour natification. Please cail 479-
2356: Telephone for the Hearing ]mpaired, far information.
Community Develapment Departmen#
Publishecf Juky 28, 2002 in the Vaii aai3y.
. ~
- . _ . . . . _ . _ ~ . . . _ . . __.r . . .
,
_ . - . . ' _ - _ _ : 5
. . . . - .
. . ....'._..w.' . ,
. . . .v...-.t-..:..: . . .
I I
~
2
I
I
~
~
Middle Creek Affordable Housing Development
S u M MARY: ~
i
i
The Middle Creek Affordable Hausing Develapment seeks to establish affordable ~
employee housing for the residents of Vail. lt wiil provida 142 units of affordable
housing, a community center, and an early learning center on a 6.673 acre site.
The site is located adjacent to the Mountain Bell building, between the Vail ~
Village roundabaut and the Lionshead pedestrian bridge. The proximity to the
center of tawn preserats the possibility of a transit-oriented development, reducing
the use of the automobile in favor of pedestrian and bus traffic. The
develapment does pravide 248 parking spaces meeting the Towrt of Vail
standards.
The Middle Creek deue[opment contains 3 residential buildings (A, B, and C),
and the early learning center. Building A is situa#ed on the bus pull-out and ~
houses community cenfer tunctions as well as living units. Building B and C are
clustered to preserve mpen space. The buildings step up the slope from south to
north respflnding to existing grades; inspired by Eurapean hifl town massing. All
building heights respect the existing Mountain Bell tower, reinfarcing its image.
Building C includ'es covered, structured parking far 211 autamobiles, significantly
reducing the need far surface asphal# on the site. The density is 21.3 dwelking
units/acre, and over 60% Qf the site is open space (both natural and landscaped).
PROGRAM:
The 142 -units of affordable housing are divided into four separate unit types;
studio, 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units. The majority of the units are three bedroom
ar studio units, Sorne unit types inctirporate variations, providing a wide range ofi
unit choices to accommodate many types of Ifvin+g situations.
Building A contains the cornmunity center Qn the ground level with studio units ~
above. The community center will contain a leasing office, laundry facilities,
At#achment: F
C . ;
~
resident's launge, mailboxes, etc. There will be a Tawn of Vail bus s#op directly !
~
in front of this buildsng. The composition of building A with the bus stop will ~
establish this as the entry into #he Middle Creek development. The new early learning center wiil replace the existing ABCILearning Tree Child
Gare Center on the site. It will serue up ta 60 children and 12-15 staff with a
;
gross area of approxirnateiy 4,800 square feet. The early learning center ~
contains five classrooms, a stucCeo, a kitchen and an outdoar play area.
SITE:
The Mountain BeII site is arranged arpund four axes, v+rhich create distinct view
corridors and organize the site as a whole. Two of these axes direct the eye to
the existing Mountain Bell tower, reinforcing this significant piece of the Tawn of
Vail's architectura9 heritage. The west partion of #he site preserves #he existing
mature vegetation and makes use of a par#ion of the existing roadway to the
~ Mountain BefE tower. The existing natural landscape will be an effective screen
from the west and help nestle the new eanstruction into the site. ;
The buildings are clustered around the base of the Mountairu Bell Tawer thereby
minirnizing surface asphalt and creating efficient pedestrian circulation. There is
significant open space and separation between the clustered resicfential buildings
and the ear9y Eeaming center ta the east. This open space corridor pravides a
strang connection to fhe existing natural areas to the north.
The site organiza#ion of the development rnaximizes open space by clustering
buildings, effectively reducing the wisual density of the praject. The bus stop is
placed just inside the main entrance of the development, aflowing easy and safe
transi# access and minimizing curb cuts. The early learning center, near the
eastern edge of the deve3apment, has both privacy and a direct connection ta the
~ surrounding apen space.
The buildings step down to the south and east reflecting the slope of adjacen# ~
grade. Pedestrian circulation is well defined by walks and patterned pavirag ;
~
connecting residential buildings fo a confinuous bike pa#h alang fhe south edge
of the parcel.
PHASING PLANS;
There are no anticipated phasing plans in pface at this time. However, in an
effort to begin site work in the fal] of 2002, the developer may seek a site work
permit after all appropriate approwals have been receiveci,
REVIEW CRITERfA FOR A DEVELOPMENT PLAN lN THE H ZONE DISTRICT;
A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and
orientatian is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding
neighboncood. ~
This development respects and incorpnrates the existing architecture of the town
of Uail. The character and scale of the buildings reflects the existing "Eurapean ~
mountain village" feel of the town. The NBauntain Bell building, a significant Vail
architecturaE kandmark, maintains its status as a cenferpiece of the development.
The orientation of the buildings provides solar access and creates south-facing
4pen spaces.. The clustering of buildings rninimizes the visual density of the
deuelopment.
B. Buildings, impravements, uses and activities are designed and located ta
produce a functianal deveiopment plarr respansive to the site, the surraunding
neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. ~
I
~
~
This development provides needed housing for the working population of VaiL ~
Within the development, units are pravided for individual workers as wefl as
I
~ wor9cing famifies. The Mountain Bell Site wifl be a xcansit-oriented development,
reducing automobiie usage in favor of bus and pedestrian traffic. The density of
the buiielings allows more room fvr open spaces and natural areas. The
development plan successfully introduces a large amount of housing while
remaining sensitive to the praminent nature of this site.
C. Open space and landscaping are bath functional ancf aesthetic, are designed
to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximrze opportunitias
for aCCeSS and use by the public, prouide adequate buffering between the
proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated
with existing open space ancf recreation areas.
The clusfiering of the buildings an the site reduces the visual impact. The spaces
araund the buildings themselves are pedestriara pfazas where residents can
interact. Between the residential and early Iearning areas af the development, a
~ landscaped area pravides a separatROn and a natural area of open space. A
bicycle and pedestrian path wi[I connec# the develapment to the pedestrian
bridge to the west. A structured autdoor recreatian area has been integrated into
the si#e using berming and fandscaped features. Natural trails provide
connections within the site and to the surraunding open space.
D. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to pravide safe,
efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulatian ta the site and throughout th+e
development.
A central spine of vehicular circulatian alfows efficient aceess and takes
advantage of the el4ngated east-west axis of the site, creating a maximum 5°/Q
grade. T'here is parking under or near each building. The entire site is served by
a Town of Vail bus stop and a bicycle/pedestrian path which will ultimately
connect ta the pedestrian bridge, reducing the need for cars overaCl. Pedestrian
~
circulation within the site takes place along a corridor which follows the centrai ~
spine yet remains separate fram vehicular traffic.
E. EnWironmental impacfs resuiting from the proposal have been identified in the
projects environmental impact repart, if not ?nraived, and all necessary mitigating
measures are implemented as a part of the propQSed development plan.
Yes, these impacts have been identified in the environmental impact repart, and
will be implemented as a part of the praposed deveCopment plan. A prefimanary
mitigatian plan has been subrnitted to the PEC, and a mitigation specialis# has
been retained to finafize the canstruction plans.
~
I
~
y
~ Early Learning Cerater at Middle Creek Affardable Housing ~
I
The Early Learning Cenfer replaces the ABC-Learning Tr+ee Child Care center
currently on the MQUntain Bell site. The new building wi[I house 5 classTOOms, a
studio area, kitchen, administrative and autdoar play areas. it will accommodate
12-15 staff members and serve up ta 60 children from the ages af 2 ta 5-1f2 in a
caring and educational enuironment. The nature of the proposed use is f€arther
described in the summary program proUided.
RELAT]ONSHIP TQ DEVELOFMENT OBJECTIVES:
The Early Learning Center replaces an already existing childcare center on the
Mauntain Bell site. There shauld be no additional impact on the Tawn of Vail
Development Objectives.
~
EFFECT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES AND AREAS:
As the proposed Early Learning Center replaces a use which aIready exists on
the Mountain 8e11 Site, it shauld have no additional measurable effects on public
facifities areas.
~
EFFECT 'IJPON TRAFFiC:
This informafion is listed in the provided traffic study.
COMPATlBIL1TY lSSUES:
Considerable measures will be taken to separafie the busy activities af the
housing development from the quieter actirrities of the early tearning center. The
~ Early Learning Center is an the East end of the site, separated from all of the
~
livirrg units. There is a separate entrance from North Fron#age Road providing ~
access to 22 parking spaces dedicated to the Early Learning Genter #acility. A
turnaround pravides easy drop off for patrons and provides the required
maneuvering space for emergency vehicPes. Because of its posi#ian on the
eastern end of the site, the ELC has access to the open space surrounding the
MaUntain Bell site as well. In addition, the adjacency of the hausing anci
childcare uses provides residents of the development with the opportunity to fulfill
their child-care needs on-site, enhancing the nature af this transit-oriented
development.
CHARAGTER:
The character of the Early Learning Center snould benefit the surrounding area.
The siting of the new ELC near Frontage Road wil[ allow it to take on a new
visibility, separate fram the Middle Creek development itself and the Mountain
Bell building. It will become a beacan in the cammunity as a cen#er of (earning ~
and a place fQr young children.
~
1 G Y yi`i!S 1ENY 115++.1NMEN TAL l. V I YJ V L 1U V TJ, !NC.
Consulting Engineers and 5caentists
ptiice & Caboratory:
3801 Autamation Way, Sufte 200
Fort Colfins, Colorada 80525
(970) 225-5500
FAJC (970) 226-4946
stewart@welaaceess, net
F'nvironmental I?npact Report
for #he propased
Middle Creek Village
Vafl, Calaradv
~
,
Prepared by:
Sfewart Envlronrneratal CansuJfanfs, lnc.
Cansulting Engineers and Scientlsts
Fort Co!lins, Colorado
- ~
a
i
August 2001
~
Attachment: G
~ TABLE QF CONTEN7S
Page
1. INTRODUCTiON
1
II. PURPOSE
9
111. PROJEGT BACKGRt7UNa AND QESCRIPTION 2
5ite Goracept 2
Bui[ding Cancept 2
IV, SITE DESCRlPTaON AND ENVIRONMEiVTAL INVENTaRY 3 ~
. I
, Location
3
Zaning 3
Site Usage 3
Hydralagic Conditians 3
Geolagic Conditians 4
Biotic Conditions 4
V. ENVIRONMENTAL C04VCERlVS AND RECOfV1MENDAT10N5 5
VI. C}7HER ENV9RONMENTAL CONDITIONS 7
A. Land Acquisitians and D[splacements 7
B. Larad llse and Zaning 7
~ C. Visuaf Canditions 7
D. Air Qualoty 7
E. Noise...-................................................................. 8
F. Light Pallution 8 ~
G. Flooding ..................,...,.............,...,..,...............,.---..............----...............................,................,.,..,...........8 j
H. Navigable Watenvays and Coastal Zones............................................................................................... $
1. Traffic and Parking 8
J_ Energy Requiremertts and Potential for Conservation $
K. Canstruetion
9
L. Aes#hetics
M. Cammunity Disruption 10
N. Seeondary Devefopment 11
0. AGEhICIES AND PERSONS CONSULTED 11
VIl. SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................................11
Vlfl. ASSESSQR QUALIFICATIDNS 14
FIGURES ~
I
i
1. Lacatian Map
2. Aerial Phato
3. Si#e Map
4. Phatographs
~ APPEND[CES
A. Eagle County List
i
~ I. INTR{3DUCTION
Odell Architects, PC retained Stewart Environmental Consultants fnc. ta perfarm an
Environmental lmpact Assessment of the proposed Middle Creek Village develapment. The
property i$ Oacated adjacent fo the Mountain Bell faci[ity, directfy north acrass interstate 70 from
Vail Viliage. The proposed project consists ef mul#i-family housing constructecE on a 6.5-acre
site awned by the Town of Vail. The purpose of the project is to provide affardab{e housing for
people currently employed an Vail, vuha are presen#ly living in or near the cammunity. The
project owrter is Coughlin and Gompany, 140 East 19t' Ave., Surte 700, Denver, Colorado
80203-1035.
The sife location is depicted on Figures 1 thraugh 3. Phatographs of the site are provided as
Figuee 4.
II. PURPDSE
The purpose of performing the Environmental Impact Assessment is to achieve the fallflwing
objectiwes:
A. Availabiliiy of information: To ensure that complete information on the enviranmen#af
effects of the proposed project is arrailable ta the Town Council, the Planning and '
Environmental Commission, and the general pubfic.
~ B. Environmental Protection A Criterion: To ensure tha# long-#erm protsction of the
environment is a guiding criterian in project planning, and that land use and development
decisions, both pu#alic and private, take into account #he relative merits of possible
alternative action5.
C. Review and Evaluatian Procedure: Ta proaide pracedures for local review and
evaluation of the environmentaf effects af propased projects prior to granting of permits
or ather authorizations far commencement of developmen#_
D. Avaid Geologic Hazard Areas: Ta ensure that the buildings are nnt canstructed in
geologic hazard areas, by way of ilfustration, flood plains, avalanche paths, rockfall
areas, where such hazard cannot practically be mEtigated to the satisfaction af the
Planning and Environmental Cammission and the Town Gouncil.
E. Protec# Water Quality: To errsure that the quality of surface water and graund water
within the Town of Vail will be protected from aaverse impacts andfor degradation due to
construction activities. [Ord. 37 (1980) 19: C?rd. 19 (1976) 14: Ord. 8(1973) 16.1001
~
~
2850-001 Environmental Impact Repor# Page 1 of 14
Middie Creek Village
Vail, Colorado
S#ewart Environmental Consultants, lnc.
i
111. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTIOM ~
5i#e Concept
The initial conceptual design appraach for Midd[e Creek Vllage housing is meant to reflect a
neuv model of multi famiEy housing in mauntain communities. The site parameters and
com6nuni#y cantext v+rere the prime mativatQrs for the layout of the buifdings and parfcing;
however, the solution incorporates some planning princaples of a more uur6an" nature.
The buildings are arranged around a pedestrian oriented "street" which creates an axis running
eas# to west across the site. The "street" rises to the center of the praleet, following the
contours of the sife. Entries into individual units as well as praject amenities will occur along the
path, and it is enWisioned to include bath hardscape ar?d Iandscape areas. The pedestrian
street will be an active place reminiscent of other vif'age centers in the cammunity.
Encvuraging the use of alternate transportation, our team proposes to work wi#h the Colorado
Department of Transportatfon and the Tgwn of Vail to create aproject specsfic transi# stop, as
well as deveiap pedestrian and bicycle access from the site Fnto town. These are accessible to
the residences along a central pedestrian spine #hat runs down the nill and through a two-story
opening in the center building, ending at the praposed transit stap. Given that a large segment
of the market far thFS project will be seasonal emplayees, our team beli~ves the daily use of the
automobile can be minimal. Gansequently, the relatianship between the car and the building is
downplayed in aur solution.
Sepaeating vehicle parking from the buildings alfows the project to create a pedestrian ariented ~
"villagen character and allows #he lauifdings to be sited closer together, thus visually reinforcing
this image. This is similar to the e7cteriar pedestrian spaces created by the architecture at areas
such as Beidge Street in Vail Village and Lionshead Village. The siting of the parking areas
behind the buiidings will also help shield views of the lots from the frontage road and fFOm
aerass the Walley. ~
The Early Learning Centar has been sated to the far eastern edge of the site, but is easily
accessable firom the residences on the Eoop road. This configuration pravides a nGCely separated
site for the chifdren's facility.
I The oWerall site concept adheres cfaseiy to the ex'rsting contovrs of the site. The buildings rise
and falC across the length of the site witn the terrain, creating an undulating profile that further
reinforces the "village" concept.
Build.ing Concept
Further reinfarcing the "village" cancept, #he buildings are designed as three separate building
types. All the buildrngs will be ane unit deep, creating cross flow ventilation and ecanomy of
cons#ruction. There are na enclosed walkways or stair tnwers, as the sF#e aliov?rs the majority of
units to be accessed at grade. Internal floor p[ans wilC develop stacked plumarng cores, and the
mix of units wilf be designed to minimize structural offsets and maximize construction simplicity.
Each of the six residen#ial buildings includes a one-story element on the end v+rhich houses
laundry and storage facilities for that bUilding. The buiiding orientation creates maximum ~
2850-001 EnvirQnmental ImpaGt Repork Page 2 of 14
Middle Creek 1/illage
Vail, Colorado
Stewart Environmental Cansultanfs, lnc.
I
~
~ southern exposure far everv unit. The fact that the buildings are simply one unit deepcreates
excellent appartunities fior flow-through ventilation. Our proposal will incorporate highly efficient
mechanical and efectrical designs. VVe believe on a scale of zero to five our development will
achieve a five, or the highest efficieney rating available. Since all units are accessed from grade
or a small stair, there are no interior corridors to heat or cool, further enhancing overall energy
efficiency. Please refer io our preliminary LEED evaiuatian in Sec#ian VI-J for additianaf
information on energy and sustainability_
The overall character of the building design is meant to reinforce the "village" concept, with
varying building types, massing, and styles crea#ing a cahesive whole. Stylistically, we will
incarporate the tradition of Vail Valley architecture while rnaintairiing an economical design.
This can be achieved by the judicious use of distinct design elements throughout #he project. {n
a cost sensitive project, forms may be simple, but the sensitive use of massing, scale, and
rhythm can create an architecture that is respectful of, and complimentary to, #he surraunding
architecture of 1Iai1 Ualley. The exciting architectural design and pedestrian s#reet space will
create a of chaice for potential employees.
IV. SITE DESGRIPTION ANa ENVIROh1MEiVTAL INVENTORY
Locatian
The subjec# praperty is an irregular shaped, approximate 6.5-acre mountainside site; its location
~ is described as a part of the South 1/2 of the 5outheas# of Section fi, 7ownship 5 South,
Range 80 West of the 6'h PNI, Town of Vari, Eag1e County, Colorado. Yhe property adjoins the
extsting Mountain Bell praperty loca#ed north of the 1-70 North Frontage Road.
Zaninq
A majority of the subject si#e is presently zorred "NAPD" (Natural Area Preservation District),
and a small portion of the site where twn early learning centers are locaked is zoned °G"
(General)_ The praposed prvject will require rezaning the 6.5-acre site to the designation "H"
(Housing)..
Si#e Usage
The property is owned by the Town of Vail. Onsite deveiopment includes two small wooden
structures presently housing earfy childhaod learning centers. They are located directly east of
the offsite Mountain Bell structure. Site development plans calf for demafition of the two eariy
childhood learning facility structures wi#h cflnstructian of a rtew iearning center at the southeast
portion of the site- The remainder of the site is undeveloped open Iand except for the existing
road and parking area that serves the off-site Mountain Bell facility and the onsiteearly fearning
facilities_ The proposed use of the property was deseribed in Section I, abave.
H drola ic Conditivns ~
Na surface bodies of water are lacated an the propased project site. Qnsite surface drainage is
mainly via sheet flow and is generaCly southerly, atthough the westerrt portion of the site likely
~ drains ta Middle Creek, located aff site just to the west of the entry road. A man-made drainage
2850-041 Environrnental Impact Report Page 3 of 14
Middle Creek Village
1/ail, Colorado ,
Stewar€ Environmenta! Consultants, lne.
channel adjvins the eastern side of the Mvuntain Bell structure. Soil and drainage issues are ~
described in reports provided under separate cover by Koechlein Engineerfng and Peak Land
Consuitanfs, Inc.
+Gealogic Conditions
A geoEagic repart by RJ Irish, Consufting EngEneering Geologist, Inc. is provided under separate
cover,
8iatic Condi#ivns
Ecologically, the property is located in the Montane Zone at elevations of approxirnately 8,220 ta
8,300 feet above mean sea {evel on a southerly aspect. Regarding plant communities, the site
is descrabed as camplex as it contains elements of several communities. These include
Mantane Grasslands and Mixed Moun#ain Shrubfand located on the eastern parkion of the
mauntainside with Aspen stands occurring at the southeastern portion of the site. These
communities include representatives of mvst of the life forms of the plant kingdom including
ferns, grasses, forbes, shrubs, and trees. Native and non-native vegetation is present 'tncluding
invasi+re species of noxious weeds. The western area of the praperty is mainly Mantane
Riparian Forest dominated by Narraw-leaf Co#tonwaods (Populus angustafolia) and a sca#ering
of Thin-leaf Alder (Alnus incana) and Aspen (Populus tremuloides). Presence of Aspen as well
as species of invasive weedy farbes indicate the IikeliFaood of past cEisturbance such as fire.
CEimax community species such as Colorada Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) are located off site
higher up the Middle Creek cfrainage, but Blue Spruce and ofher eiimax community trees were
not abserved on si#e. ~
Wifdlife uses the site; large mammals including deer and eIK browse on #he Serviceberry and
Current lacafed in the Mixed hllountain Shrubland Communrty. Other mammals incEuding Black
Bear, Coyote, Fox, Rabbits, Chipmunks, Golden-mantle Ground Squirrels, Pocket Gophers, ancf
other rodent species IiKely feed ancflor inhabit the site. Reptiles, such as species of Garter
Snakes also likely inhabit the site. No majar wi[dlife migra#ory routes appear to be located on
site. Although Middl€ Greek is Iocated off site directly west of #he praperty's western boundary,
the creek is not likefy used as a migratory cqrridvr. inferstate70 and development adjoining the
south side of I-70 preciude use of the carridor far migratory use. Middle Creek is contained
within a culvert frorn ths north side of I-70 to its confluence with Gare Creek svuth of I-70.
No knovun ihreatened or endangered species of plants or anirnals have been identafed at the
site. However, na anSite surveys for such species are known to have been performed. The
Colorado 1Vatural Heritage Program's Conservation Sfatus Handbook (7999) list5 the status of
various anirnals, plants, and plant communit'res found in Eagle County. A copy of the Eagle
Caunty lis# is provicled in Appendix A.
We recomrnend hav'rng the Calorado IVatural Heritage Program perform a G1S "Enviranmental
Re+rGewn of the subject site and adjacent area. The review searches known ecoaogical infarmatian regarding the status of plants, plant cornmunities, and anirnals within aspecified
radius of the subject propErty. The review will repart the status of these communities.
Middle Creek, a relatively prastine stream that likely cantains Native Cutthraat Trout, traverses
the adjacent properky to the west of the subject site. The creek flows out of a saddle located to ~
2850-001 EnvirQnmentaf Impact Repart Page 4 of 14
Middle Creek Village
Vail, Coloradv
SPewar# Envirnnmenta! Gonsultants, lnc.
~ the north upsEope from the site. kt flows southerly down sfope, }ogs west arounti the Mountain
Bel] building, and then flows southerly for approximately 150 feet paral{eling the west $icCe of the
entry raad ta Mountain Bell. It enters a culvert beneath I-70 and the associated frantage roads
and flows through the culvert south of I-70 to its discharge point into Gore Creek south of the
interstate. Gore Creek f1Qws westerEy ta its confluenee with the Eagle River near Mintum.
The existing creek channel may not be the historic creek channel. Strearn rnoaifica#ian
(channefization) appears to have been conducted upstream of the culvert adjacent to the entry
road. This 150-foeat reach is Gkeiy the closest Iocation of the stream to the subject praperty,
The stream bank, as well as its associated vegetatian, appears disturbed afong this reach.
Observed vegetation was rnainly upland in rrature wifh both native (Westem wheat gra5s-
Agropyron sp.) and non-native species of grasses (brome-Bromus enurmus), as well as
invasive n4xious weeds (See Figure 4 photographs, page 2). Upstream fram this reach and otfi
s'ste from the subject property, a riparian corridor of wetland vegetatian adjoins the stream
channel.
Adjoining the east side of the entry road, adjacent to its 150-fioot narthlsouth orientation, is a
Narrow-leaf Cottanwood (Populus angu.stifolia) community. This species is referenced in the
U.S. Department of the interior, Fish and Wildlife Service publication, IVational List of Plant Species That Occur Irr Wetlarrrls,• Inferrnauntar`n (Region 8). lts indicator category is listed as ;
"Facultative", which is described as "Equally likely to occur in wetlands or nanwetlands !
{estimated probability 34°fo-66%}. 7he presence of this communi#y may be dus to a former j
focation of the stream channel or may be dus to high graundwater conditions existing near the
stream channel.
~ The Rlarraw-leaf Coftonwoad C4mmunity continues to the north (off site) and south (on site) of
the en#ry road after the road tums east. Figure 4 Photographs, page 2, depicts the entry road
a9ong its easUwest orientation v,rith the Narro+nr-Ieaf Gottonwoocf Community adjoining both sides
of the road. The presence of this community is an indicator of the patentiaC existence o#
wetlands; it daes not necessarily confirm their presence. Actual wet9and existence can only be
determined by peeforming a wetland assessment, which not only considers vegetation typa, but
a[so inveskigates other factors including the presence of hydric soils and wetlartd hydrology.
Mantane Enuironmental Solu#ions of Vail, Colarada is presently @nuestiga#ing wetland issues at
the site, A letter regarding the status of their investigatian is praVided under separate cover.
V. ENVlRQNMENTAL CONCEaNS AhiD REGOMMENDATIQNS
The praposad Middle Creek Vsllage will impact plant and animal eammunsties present6yr
inhabiting the praperty. Site ctevelopment including earth moving activities and building/parking
Cot constructian will strip a majarity of the existing natiue and nQn-native vegetatian and displace
wildlife from the approximate 6.5-acre site. However, existing vegetation and wildfife are not
site specific. Surrounding property to #he narth, eas#, and west contain vast square miles of ~
similar plant communi#ies, wildlife habitat, and wiidlife species. The loss of these 6.5 acres j
does nat represent a signifcant impact to the plant and animal communities. aisplaced wildGfe
will find and inhabit nearby similar habita#,
~
2850-001 Environmental Impact Repart Page 5 of 14
Middle Creek Village
Vail, Colorada
S#ewart Errvironmenta! Consultants, Inc.
LandsCaping incfuding grass, shrubs, and trees will cover a minimum of 30% of the developed ~
site. Middle Greek Village will be sensitively integrated int4 environmental surroundings. Birds,
insects, and possib4y small mammals will utilize the landscapea areas, which will mit'tgate some
habitat ioss.
The presence of Middle Creek ViElage will have impacts on use of adjacent property by wifdlife-_
particularly large mammais. ancreased human presence and reflected light may infkuence
adjoirting habitat use. Adjoining property is private so tha# residents of the village shauld not be
using adjoining properties. HumaNbear interaction is possible. All trash dumpsters wiil need tQ
be cavered and otherwise made bear proaf. Lighting designed to recfuce reflected light and
conform to the Town of 1A2i1 building code v+rill be incorporated into the site design.
Impact to Middle Creek frorn surface runaff will be minimized. Potential irnpacts include
greaselvil runaff from paued parking areas and sandlgraaei runoff from winter sanding of roads.
The location of accumulated snow piles resulting from plowing will be addressecf. The piles will
be located such that snowrnelt containing grease, ail, silt, sand, and gravei da not impact Middie
and Gore Creeks. Any such cantaminants disc'harged to Middle Creek may impair water
quality of the creek end potential1y impact the fsheries of both MiddCe and Gvre Greeks.
Engineered drainage swales, berms, dike5, etc. will be incarporated irtto the praject design to
prevent urnpact to Middle Greek. ConstructFQn will be in accordance with all applicable Iocal, ~
state, and federal regulations and standards. lf dewatening is required during canstruction,
water will be retained on site. As previously referenced, drainage issues are adckressed in a
report aander separate coWer.
Montane Environmental Solutions is performing a wetland assessment. As previousiy ~
referenced, a potantial exis#s for the existence of jurisdectional wetlands in the uicinity of the
Narrow-leaf Gottonwoad Forest lacated adjacent to #he existing access road. The presenCe of
this community is an indicator of the potential existence of wetlands; i# daes not necessareiy
confirm their presence. We recammend perfarming a wetland assessment conforming to US
Army Corps of Engineers (The Carps) guide[ines. If on-site wetlands are identified, several
alternatities are available. 7hese inciude: 1) establishing development setbacEcs from the
wetlands 2) wetlands can be taken through the 404 Permitting peacess and replacement
performed #o mitigate #he loss or 3} if the wetlands are beEow minimurrt surface areas
establisheck by the Corps„ they may be removed and built upon. If an-site jurisdictional
wetlands are identified, The Carps is the ageney regulating such matters.
A parking fac'rlity is praposed at a location just east of the Mountain Bell structure. Middle Creek
lies north and west of this area. Irrapacts to the riparian corridor and wildlife using the corridor
adjacent to Nl9ddle Creek will to be minimized. Ti his can be accornplished by constructing the
parking area as far as possible from Middie Creek. Grainage issues as previously referenced
are also a concern in this area of tne site. Engineered drainage swales, berms, dikes, etc. will
be incorporated i:nto the project ciesign to prevent impact to Middle Greek.
~
2850-001 EnWironmental lmpact Report Page 6 of 14
Middle Creek Village Vail, Colorado .
Stewart Environmenfa! Consultants, lRC. ~
~ VI. QTHER ENVlRONMENTAL CON'i}iTIONS
A. Land Acquisitions and Displacements
The impact is "Generaliy Not Significant". ~
I
Approximately 6.5 acres of land is cequired; the developerlproject owner is Gough[in and '
Company, 140 East 19th Ave., Suite 700, Denver, CO 80203-1 fl35. The Town of Vai] owns the
land. It is proposed that the Town of Vail wifl lease the site to the deweloper #or a 53-year period
at which fime #he property will revert to the Tawn.
Two displacements will result from implementation of the praposed project. The ABC and the
Learning Tree ear8y cMildhood learning centers will be displaced. The existing buildings will be
demofished, and new facilities will be constructed at the southeastern portion af #he site.
Skate regulatians require a fufl National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) asbestas inspection of the builclings prior to demolition. lf #he inspection rdentifies
asbestos-cantaining materials, regulations require their removal prior to demalition af the
buildings.
No minority camrrrunities, households, ar minority-owned businesses are {ocated on site, and
therefare, will not be impac3ed by any potential negative environmental concerns such as noise,
air, or water polltatian; ar fram the construction of the facility.
~ B. Land lise and Zonin
The impact is "Generally IVot SignificantA.
A majari#y of the subject site is presently zoned "NAPD" (Natural .Area Preservataan D6strict),
and a small portion af the site where two early learning centers are located is zaned G. The
proposed projec# wilf require rezoning to the designation "H" (Hausirag).
C. Visual Canditions
Parking areas will be lacated behind housing thereby shielding it from view from the Tflwn of
Vail. Overall project form and massing is in character with existing Vaif Vilfage. The height,
mass, and materials tha# will be used in the proposed IVliddle Creek Village will convey a sense
of permanence artd contex#ual and regional appropriateness.
D. Air Quality
The impac# is "Generally Nat Signifcant".
The praject wilE confarm to alf applicab9e facal, state, and federal air quality regulatians and ~
~
standards, including, but not lirr3i#ed to those regulating ador, dust, fumes af gases, wh?ch are ~
noxious, foxic, or corrosiwe, and suspended solid or liquid particles.
~
2850-001 Environmental Impact RepoR Page 7 of 14 '
Middle Creek Village
Vail, Coiorada
Siewarf Envrronrrrantal ConsuPtants, Inc.
Fireplaces wiil not be installed in the clevelopmentthereby eliminating wood smoke. There will ~
be no balconies or decks thaf would provide space for grilEs ar barbecues. There may be a grill
in a public area of the complex.
The Middle Creek Village project is designed to discotrrage vehicle usage and encourage other
modes af transporta#ian such as buses, biking, and walking. TDA of Colorado performed a
transportation impact analysis regarding the proposed lVliddle Creek Village. Their report is
provided under separate cover. The repork indicates that the impact of traffic generated by the I
proposed praject will be "Generally Not Significant".
E. Noise I
The impact is "Generally Not 5ignificanY". I
Stewart Environmental identified no noise-sensitive land uses on adjacenfi properties. The
proposed si#e is lacated adjacent to the north side of 1-70, The noise fram the interstate is far
greater than any that would be produced by the devefoprnerat.
F. Light Pollution
The Middle Greek VilEage development will have mfnirnal Eight #respass fram the residential
buildings.
G. Flooding
.
The impac# is "Possibly Significant".
Peak Land Consultants, Inc. adttresses f{ooding issues in a repQrt prowided uRder separate
couer.
H. Naviqable Waterways and Coastal Zones
The impact is "Generally Nat Significant".
Thc proposecR site is not focated near ar affected by a navigable waterway ar a coasta9 zone.
1. Trafric and Parkina
7he irnpact is "Generally Nat Significan#n.
TDA of Colorado perfarmed a traffc study. Their report is provided under separate cover.
J. Ener Re uirements and Poten#ia[ for Conservatian
The irnpact is "Generally Not Significant".
The proposed project is expected ta result in energy conservatian. The Vail Affordabie Housing
Praject, Vail, Colarado incorporates principles of sustainabie design and utiiizes design
strategies to reduce its energy and enaiCOnmenta? impact. 7he U.S. Green BuiJding Couracil's ~
2850-001 Environmental Impaet Report Page 8 of 14
Middle Creek Village
Vail, Colorado
Stewart Environmenta! Cansultants, 1nc.
~ Leadership in Energy and Environmental besign (LEED) rating sys#em is here used as a
preliminary sustainable design measure of the project. As it is currenfly written, LEED versian
2.0 is a system designed ta rate new and existing cammercial, irastitutional, and high-rise
residential buildings. It specifcally rates low-rise residential projects. The USGBC is currently
developing a residential version of #he LEEQ rating system. Mevertheless, the sustainabie
design principles embadied in LEEp v. 2.0 senres as useful goals, guidelines, anti measure for
sustainable features of the Vail Affordable Housing Project
The LEED rating system consists of seven prereqvisite criteria and 32 user-selected criteria
Qrganized into five categories:
• Sustainable Site Development
• Vlfater Efficiency
• Energy anc! Atmosphere
• Materials and Resources
• Indaor Environmental Quality
LEED is a voluntary, consensus-based, market-driven building rating system based on available
proven technology that ewalUa#es environmentaf perfarmance from a"whole buifding"
perspective over a building's life cycle. The following preliminary LEED analysis incorparates
input fram the design #eam ta more accurately evaluate the canceptuai cfesign af the Vail
Affflrdable Housing Projec#_
K. Construction I
~ The impact is "Generally Not Significant".
Canstruction of the Middle Creek Village is anticipated to commence in March 2002 and wEll last
for approximately 18 manths, therefore any construction impacts +nrill be temporary and of short
duration. All construction $taging wifl be focated an site and construction activities predaminantly wilE be confned to this site. ~
;
Contraetors will be required to obtain the necessary permits and eompiy v+fith afl relevant town, ~
state ar,d federal eegulations regarding construction and safety. Potential construction impacts ~
are described befow. Noise
No noise-sensitive Eand uses are located on adjacent property. Constructian hours and
noise levels will comply with the Tawn af Vail poGicSes.
Disruation of lJtilities
It is aroticipafeef that there will be no eiisruption of uti[ities, and there#ore no significanl
impact with this activity. Canstruction of aCl utilities ta serve #he site will be coratained
within the proposed si#e. •
Disposal of Debris and Spoil
~
2850-041 Environmental Impact Report Page 9 of 14
Middle Creek Village
k/c31l, CD{4fcldO
3tewart Enuironmental Gonsultanfs, lnc.
DemoGtion of two bui[dings is required as previously referenced. All construction debris ~
woll be dispased at an approved landfifl and transported on designa#ea truck routes. The
gsneral contractor wi[i be responsible for on-site cleanup and disposal of debris.
Sail fal may be required to eleWa#e buildings abave the 10[}-year flo4d plain. Disposal of
saii is not required. ;
I
Water Quality and Runoff j
_ I
Project cans#ruction will no# impact existing water quality. The generaC contractor wil)
comply wv6th water quaGity requirements for site construction ta rreeet state water quality
regulations. Best Management Practices (BN1Ps) will be implemented cfuring i
construction including the use of erosion conteoP measures.
Access and bisru tian of Traffic
City streets will not have any significant impact since the site is located directiy off the 1-
7(} North Frontage Road_ Any frontage road diversions will be addressed with a detoUr
plan.
Air Quallty and Dust Gontrol
Standard construction practices and BMPs will be used to control and minimize onsite
dust and emissians.
~
Safety and Security
Standard construction safety measures will be observed on site. Town of Vail police will
ensure security.
Disruptian of Businesses
No businesses are @ocated €n the immediate vicinity of the project area.
L. Aesthetics
The impact is "Generally Nvt Significant".
The height, mass, and materials tha# wi[# be used in the proposed Middle Creek Village will
convey a sense of permanence and contextual and regional appropriateness. In addition, #he
facility design will promate an arderly circulatian and efficient integratian of buses, other
vehicles, and pedestrians.
M. Comrnunity Disruption
The impact is "Generally Not Significant".
No businesses or residential secfors will be disrupted or displaced, and na segments of the
community will be isolated as a result of this prappsed project. .
2850-001 Environmenta! lmpact Report Page 10 of 14
Middle Creek Village
Vail, Calorada
Stewart Environmenta! Consuttants, fnc.
~
i
i
~ N. Seccsradary Development
i
The impact is "Generally Not Significant". ;
The proposed ,project vuill not generate secondary development. The projec# is an vutcome of
the community's de#ermination to provide afFordable housing for people already empEoyed in
Vaii and are presentay living in or near the cornmun'tty. The proposed housing project indirectly
addresses the cause of traffic-related problems.
0. AGENCIES AND PERSONS COMSIlLTED
Agencies and Personnel
? Colorado Division of Wildlife, Vail Area - Bilf Andree, WEldlife Conservation Officer
> Colorado Natural Heritage Program at Colorado State University- Beth Van Dusen
> Derrver Regulatory Offce, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Terry Mc}Cee
g Colorado State University, Department of Entomology, Phyllus Pineda
References Used
1. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Ganservation Status Handbook, VoIume 3, Na.
~ 2, May 1999.
2. Fish and Wildfife SENIC@, US Department vf the Interior, N'atiorral Lrsf of Planr
5pecies That G?ccur in Weflands: Intermountair? (Regian 8), Bialogical Report 8$,
May 1988,
3. Mitsch, WJ & Gosselink, JG, Wetlands, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 211d Ed, 1993.
4. Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rnndeau, S. Kettfer, A. McMullen, and J.
Sanderson. 1999c. A Classification of Riparran Wetland Planf Associations of
Colorado.' User Guide to the Classrfication Project. Colorado Naturai Heritage
Program, Colorado State University, Fart Collins, CO 80523
Vll. SU'MMARY
I
i
Odefl Architects, PC retained Stewart Environmental to perForrn an En+rironmentaf lmpact
Assessment af the proposed Middle Greek Vilfage development IACated in Vail, Colorado.
Based on the fndings contained in this report, tne fol'lowing conclvsimras have been drawn and
apinions and recommendatians made:
~ I
2850-001 Environmental Impact Repart Page 11 of 14
NliddEe Creek Vi[iage VaiE, Colorado
Stewart Envrronmenta! Cansultants, lnc.
Findin s Conc[usions O inions and Recammendatians I
1. The propased Middle Creek Village development is located adjacent to the Mountain j
Bell fiacility, directly north acrass Interstate 70 from Vail Village. The proposed project
consis#s of multi-family housing constructed on a 6.5-acre site owned by the Town of
Vail_ The project will not promote secondary development. The purpase of the project is
to provide affardable housing far people currently employed in Vail who are presently
living in or near the communi#y. The project owner is Coughlin and Company, 140 East
99" Ave., Sui#e 700, Denuer Ccrloradv 80203-1 035.
2. A majarity of the subject site is presently zoned "NAPD" (Natural Area Presarvatian
District), antf a smail partion af the site where twr early learning centers are located is
zoned G. The praposed project will require rezoning ta the designation uH" (Hausing),
3. Ernironmental issues regarding the propased project are addressed in reports pravided
under separate cover. These include a} geologic hazards - RJ Irish, Consulting
Engineering Geologist, Inc., b) drainage issues - Peak Land Consultants, Inc., c) sals -
K9echlein Engineering, and d} traffic - TDA af Colarada.
;
4. WetlancE issues were identified and are addressed within this repart. Montane
Enviranrr,ental Solutions of vail, Colorado is presently performing an in-depth i
investigation of the wetland issues_ A letfer regarding the status of their investigation is
provided under separa#e cover.
5. WiIdlife uses the site; Earge mammals including deer and elk browse an the Serviceberry
~
and Gurrent located in the Mixed it,llountain Shrubland Gammunity. Other mammals
including Black Bear, Coyote, Fox, Rabbits, Chipmunks, GoVden-rnantle Gratrnd
Squirrels, Poclcet Gophers, and other rodent species like6y feed andfor inhabit the site.
Reptiles, such as species of Garter Snakes also likeiy inhabit the site. Na majar wildlife
migratory routes appear to be lacated on site. Although Middle Creek is located off site
' directly west af the praperty's western boundary, the creek is na# likely used as a
migratory corridar. Interstate70 and devefoprnent adjoining the south side of 1-70
preclude use of the cvrricfor #or migratory use. Midd4e Creek is contained within a culvert
from the north side of I-70 to its confluence wi#h Gore Creek south of 1-70.
6. No known threatened or endangered species of plants or animals have been identified at
the site. Hawever, no on-site surveys for such species are known to have been
perforrned. The Colorado Natural Heritage Prflgram's Conservatlon Status Handboak
(1999) lists the status of various animals, plan#s and plant communities faund in Eagle i
County. A copy of the Eagle County list is provided in Appendix A. i
We recommend having the Colarada Natural Heratage Program perform a GIS
"Environmental Review" of the sub;ect site and adjacent area. The review searches known ecological infarmation regarding #he status of plants, plant communities and
. animais within a specified radius of the subject property. The review will repar# the
status of these communities.
7. The proposed Middle Creek Viflage will impact plant and animal comrnunities inhabiting
the property. Sate develnpment incfuding earth moving activities and building/par'king lot
~
2850-041 Environmenta! Impact Report Rage 12 of 14
EUliddfe Creek Village
Vail, Golorado
Stewart Enviranmen#a! Consultants, lne.
canstruction wilf sfrip a majority of the existing native and nan-native wegekation,
~ including noxious weeds, and displace wild9ife fram the apprQximate 6.5-acre site.
Howeuer, existing vegetation ancf wildlife are not site specific. Surrounding property to
the narth, east and west contain vast square miles of similar plant communities, wildlife
habitak and wildlofe species. The loss of these 6.5 acres does not represent a significant
impact ta the plant and animal cammunities. Displaced wildlife will find and inhabi#
nearby similar habitat_
8. The presence of Middle Creek Village will have impacts on use of adjacent properky by
wijdlife, particularly large mammals. Increased human presence and reflected light may
inflUence ad}oining habi#at use. Adjoining property is prirrate so that residents of the
Village should not be using adjoining properties. Humanfbear interac#ion is possible. All
trash durr7psters will need to be Govered and otherwis€: made bear proof. Lighting
designed to reduce reflected light and conform ta the Town of Vail building cade will be
incorporated into the site design.
9. Impact to Middle Creek from surface runoff will be minirnized. Potential impacts inc[ude ;
geeaseloil runoff from paved parking areas and sand/gravel runoff fram winter sanding of '
roads_ The location cat accumulated snow piles resulting fram plowing virill be add6essed.
The pileS will be lacated such that snowmelt containing grease, oil, silt, sand, antl gravel
do not impact Middle anci Gore Creeks. Any such contaminants discharged to Midclle
Creek may impair water quality of the creek and poterrtially impact the fisheries of both
Middle and Gore Creeks_ Engineered drainage swales, berrns, dikes, etc. will be
incorporated into the projeet design to prevent irnpaci to Middle Creek. Canstruction wili
be in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations and standards.
~ If dewatering is required during consfructian, water wiil be retained orr site.
10. A parking facility is proposed a# a lacation just east of #he IVaountain SeN s#ructure.
Micldle Creek lies norkh and west of this area. Irnpacts to the riparian carric#or and
wifdfife using the carridor adjacent to Middle Creek will to be minimized. This can be
accomplished by canstructing the parking area as far as possible fram Middle Creek. Drainage issues as previously referenced are also a concern in this area of the site. '
Engineered drainage swales, berms, dikes, etc. wiil be incorporated into the project
design to prevent impact to Middle Creek. . ~
11. Twcs displacemen#s wikl resu{t fram implementation of the propased project. The ABC
and the Leaming Tree early chiltfnaod leaming centers will be displaced. The existing
buildings will be tfemolished anct new facilities will be cans#ructed at the southeastern
portion of the site.
State regu[atians require a fulf National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) asbestos inspection of the bui6dings prior to demalition. ff the
inspectirn identifies asbestos-cantaining materials, mitigation (abaterrienUremoval) per
regu[atians will be performed prior to demalition of the buildings.
~
2850-001 Environmental Impact Repart Page 13 of 14
Middle Creek Village
Vail, Calorada
5tewart EnvrroRmental Consultanfs, Inc.
viii. AssFSSaR cauaLIFicaTlarvs ~
Stewart Environmental has performed environmental consult3ng services far more than 2,800
different clients since 1980. With a staff of 25 professional engineers, scientists, and
technicoans, Stewart Environrriental is qualified to perform enviranmentae impact assessments.
The following is a list of key Stewart Envirorttnental personnel and their respansibilities on this
project:
> Richard G. Patterson, PE Project Administrator
9 Raberk J. Blinderman, REPA Environmental Scientist ~
Mr. Pa#tersan (registered professiona8 engineer) provided overaEl project administration and
project review. Mr. Blinderrnan (M.S. Natural Scoences, M.S. Indus#rial Science, registered
enviranmental praperty assessor, and certified asbestos inspector) performed the recorcEs
revie+nr, site reeonnaissance, intenriews, lacal governmental offcial contacts, and prepared the
repQrt of the findings of the environmental impact assessment. Mr. Patterson reviewed the final
assessment report. . .
This report vvas_
~
Prepared by. Uncier the direction nf:
, . , ~ -e-.~.~-?' ~~~~~t.~-~..
Rober# J. Bk errnan Richard G. Patterson, PE
Environmental Scientist Vice F'residant
I
~
2850-001 Enviranmentaf Impaet Repart Page 14 of 14
NCidd.le Creek Village
Vaif, Calorado
Stewart Environmenta! Consultants, Inc.
i
•
• Figures
~
Stewart Fnvironmenta! Cansultants, lne.
~ 1 , t, , ?~r , ~ 1 r~' - i ' r,~ ~
~ i ~ l~~/~ 1 ~ s ~i i I j ~ 1 f ~ d ~ f ~ i 1~ 1, I ~ ~ !'rs _ !f fri:i "/.S~ ! 1 + ~ .,f ~t r' Qi I I ~ ~ ~ f rr~~~ ~ ,~s ~'•-w
~N,1\
~~,~ti\ `I a F~~rf~/~ ~~~t~_ } <<'4'S ~ I i 0. _
I.r r~ ti I r~~l;,±~ ot 'r ~ j ~ti. c~ J•'~~f f~ ; ' t ~ 4 I 'ti ~ ~ -
'
''l, JC ~,1 ~Y~ i•~4t4i~ r~ ~\~`\s Iilf ~ C ~ 'y 1 '1 Jr ' ~ .
r~ ,~t1~~<<'t~ ii . ~r +~i Y ~f~ ~ ti~~i . il IY~ //r ,-y- -
. ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~~.t II{i `5~ ` ~y~ ~ f~- \ti~~, J'~•~r~j//s~ - i ~i i~a i 7~ ~~y~.`~~~~'~ rw\ lFl:~k ~ ~ r~%, ~t~!,~~~=-.-~: f t,~f~~~~ t'vl
~z v
{`~I•+ ~ + ~ ; ~ _'7 ~'r
~,~-~,~;~i :~i,'~;•.~L _ i~1~ .~i f } v f _
. r~ t L~ ~ 1 rt(~r~l _ l ~~I~ ~ ~ J I 1 + ` ?I ~ ,~4"A/.~ ,
~I
i
;-5~~1~~/~~ t, i.r~. ~~~t', }I ~<<~ r~~ l rf.~ f ~ s- ~7~~~"~r` y 1 }~~'r! ~r~ r~;/~ r
~
• }~fl'. l. ~ ~ [1f I ti 41~I`.l5 5 ~f/~~~._ ~r~ ~ ~ r~~~~i J f + ~ ~ I~ + Z~:~' ~ ~ r;~ f~~ ; f /
N~~~-
y ~l,~'
1\;;,~ y~ \ - ~1 ~~f I~ ~ ~11 4 /~~f l ~~~A ~ + ' ~ I " •~~~lf!/ f~ /~f~:~ ~ ~~'-f J S.E '
-fi'!
Zo.
w,
t. r~ _ ili~e~f•-~~:I~FEn.I~~'~~ 1~~/ i ~~t ~~~I' ` ( I`',~~ ~ -
~'}pI ~ ~ ~ li~'~ ~,,n ~ ~ ti s'~''j~ ~ 'S :`.,~~~f/~n~fJ, "I,~' t~, • ` ;4 ~f _ ~atr~' _
~1.. 4 4A ~ . ~ M1`~, L f'~ i' r ~ ~ 1 . i ~ ~ { 4 i~', } ' _ -
7mm
v:`, q ~ - - _
,z x,+li'i
~
~ ~ ~ f i ! ~ I ~ t . ? . ~ ~ ~ ~ ``tii' ~ -
~
r,
• 1 ~ 'iw~ ti .`~s, ~ ~ = '!rf l' ~ ~ s• 4'' 1."- f ; f--v
%
I~.'~, . ~ i~ ~ - . i\` ~ ~i ~I. Ir'1 l ? - . ~ ~i r l ~
IIr ~ ~ 1,!J ~1~ r > 91Gd?. ~ ~ ~
, ~ _ _ ~ ; --L ^-j- . • ` . . `'L r ~ f
SITF l~/ ~ ~
~ ~ L+~CATJOlY ~ =`t
. r~
...'~j ~k 1_ ~ ~ ~,71 ~ ~11' ~P y~ _ _ ~ ` ~~1..~ _ _ • ~ ~~r.,_~=. .
¦
.
r
! E G 4
~ I . . _ _ ~ ~`„~"t~. ? tt~ ` h~ . " . s i. ~
/ --i~,.,i•_ ; e~. ~ ~V . k ~t f~5.
a'-..~r 'l ~ i ~ 4y"ti1"~ `','111 ~ h s dIr~ - ' ` T •r . 3:a
~f~ ~ -A ~ ~ ~-.~~~3i ~KV~~~~ +e-.s~;, E-. a ~ ~.,~•x"~ 1f 1. ' , . ~ ~ S r E f'
' 9
i ~ ?7 ~ . ?-o, ~`f~~ , f~ L•-~~"
`vF'~F
. /
, . ~ .
yp
_T%
MtZ*
r f l r . _ t ,~'.~`y.•._ ~ ~ ti ~ ? r i~ f`f - _ ~
~r XX~,/ir--~.__- s~!~- ~-:y ~f„•
' i' ' ~ ~I l • = - ~ •a,.,ti~-"`_-' ~ f r ; i f~r'
r„1. t ,f: l ' _ . •l~___ .,a`~.\ \ ~~.d ~t/ r
4i I~. .6 / ~ = c: ~'~'f'~ -.`a-1z-x-} y~+ .I~ I ? i 1 5 ~ . } 4~ ~ ( s i ~ / f%~•~,~~I 1 - . - ~ ~x ` . . . . _ . . ? ~ ~ I 1.
f~~'
q
"'.^.!Y f~ ' f I f ~ ~ 4 y e . IFI ~F' - ~ ~
-A-P
~
SOURCES: N
VAIL WEST, COLO. VfUL EAST, COLO. ~ ~ ~ 1/2 1 MILE
NW14 M9tVTURN 15'" qUA(~RANGLE NWl4 MI1VTiJRN 15" qUAqRp,~IGLE
39106-F4-T~-~)24 39106-F3-TF-024
1970
1s7a s
SCALE 1 :24,(7017
Pholorevised 1487 Photorevised 1987
DMA 4763 fll NW- Series V877 DMA 4763 III NE - Series V877 CONTOUR lNTERVAL 10 FEET
I 4D FROJECT NllM9ER PROJECT
STL~WARTENVIRQNMENTAL 2850-001 Il~o!dle Creek V!lage FfGURE 1
CCINSUITANTS, [NC. D...I!
varl, Golorado L.CICI~~'IC7f~ MAP
Cans~¢Itirtg Engfneers ancf Scientisis ,Q(/g(,~St 2(}(~1
I
or :XrT7-fi!" ~
{ ! ,i c ~
~I-
Y ,.t ;n + •z-~,(F- ~ = r ~ a s- r ~ '~t ~ f 2, ¢ti ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~
~`w ~ ~„»3 Y'~-+"`t*..~~i a s~`.vy~ ~ a~ e.~s,u '3W1 •a q~~3•~-F;~~"7 ~;fg Mk -1 > p"'
~ u'}^~ ~ ~ ~~'„d ; } a ~ x~ °.~s v c t~.'f .'`i `~~,+"rr ~.r'",~ 1YS S . "''l~ A ~ ~ A ~
~ • " z~`~~t~a ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J r ~E ~ s~ ~ ~ ° a z
01
,rr•~' ~ Y~ YT tr}.. ~'~Y f h ? ~ d.~ ti L'R' 'k ~ K~ 'i~ S ~ 1' ii ~~i '~JC ~A S 1 v ~ ~ , Sd ~p ~ ',y
V) Z Z +~+"',i
~
~P
i, a
x,i t''~~ ,~_r r;, u~^ f { L~ ~ * ' +4 x ~ y ir,y,,,Sh r - + ~ r •e. i ' .i,.$ ~ a ~
•..~4~ N
• ; ~ 1 r
-YJ
~'`'~ve... +f 7f, -C -u- r - ~,^•~r +k ~ ~ f ~?"P~ d f C ~ ~J ~ C r ~ F" s # r g k r g-xt . -1~
{
T~.•z.,p"~i.. . r . n wr vP
'4 1 p.f2
,~p,,.'4 r'M t t r ~,t ~•u -t ~-y, z74,
~
%
Lel
*i
y 5~ ~ g v l~ ~ ~<.p ~ ~ : t }.a r e ,
~-4h~'.~
,j
".7t~ P~ 40~.x
i
? ..r r y a`' . *,yo- : Y ~,t ,,y, .ex• ~ c. ~ w .y. d 4 rF ~ ~ ~ y ~
" ~r k ~,1' 7 ~t 't.• T~ ~ 7 S~
~
p Rar
y~ r y 5
ti~l~ ~ 'r. *e' ~cF `A:_ ~ F+•{~~~~~ ~e`~ .'t :4A ¢ ' S .w j ~y _r
s .t +4,a r-..P Y Sw~r• tr' ~ -S~ r r S~ Y i n ~
•"-rJr ' ""l~ t .-t~ {.i+F ~ '!c ~ Y,~ ~{C' +y : 1 +a. ~1 f v.. y ~ i~ 4 .r' 1 44 1 ~ 1 . 7 .
'Gft:f.:.-
~^w2~s~'.~ ~ jt ~c ~Z n Ks. ,'x f h ~ w„ °'c y . . - { ~ w ~ 7 p~ r ~ "i "j ~ +TaZ ~ 9 d ~
s. 1k.
- . 1"ar Kw 1Ff ^ : e~'^' `V . n~ k . i4 ?f ~ i # i'~ ~t ~ _'3 > i
~ yJY't~~, ~i.,~. ~Y4r ~ c ...F i, y ` A ~r ti J-16
~ Y~r.~" +v.c'Fx~ j~
i • ~y
_ ~ r . , ` ~ • ' ,
~ ~ , r v ~ ~,r r~x ~ .T • ~c+ a , ~ ~J
!
r
A t'Rw ~ • ~~r . a r ~ a ~ ~ '
b~.'~ ~ ~ !fr ~ "~~r . ,~F -F~~;~.~y . ~ .'k J t`" 4 v' ~X _ r c~ • r
r •.tfi~N~, ~4 r~ ~ L~' .F.. sT '..,.;7 ~ Q`'i~ 19~r°
~
i S o~. j 4`-::~rfi -~5 ~s: . r f,e ~ ~ u.'~' F ? ~ s t ~.-4 ~ Y ~ ,~"i~ -3
. s S ~ " ~.7 ~j`,~ ~~yY~ .y,y.~ ~l~ • ti ' : t~
, ~ d a ,r t a7C 1
.q"+e~~
f
.Art A
6~
a A
i~
s
w7
,.c41 ~ . r~.° '`z sr ~ a ,-t ~ ,~,s ~~",y~,R"~r - y ?,rr ~ 1 r ~
r~
x
.t } 4 f _ .~e 3 .A,, ~ 1'. .1 Yd+t. +•w ~r; ~~+r4~a ~ '°~°j~~ r~~~ ~K: ~-~L~*,e~-~r a.
" : ,n. ~ . "i`a~''f ~ ~ :;s,~ { "k"i ° ~'l~"~'~JGM-~~.~r's~'.+F~.~°'~.&: ~ E ~ ~ •s ~ t r / t~ ~5 y,
X ..y .,a, . ~ J ~ ! f . trl Y
r''~'; ~..^~~Cx.`a.tr...~3:.r3`~ .s~ ..5~ *~t'`„e?zy~.. , -1..i~w.T ~~V , ~ a.~~. ~i' a ~l ~ '
PA9.ECi NUMeER PROJEC7 ~
S7EW,4RT ENVlRONMENTAL 2850-1101 Middle Creek village F IGL1 RE 2
~
CONSU[TANTS, INC. ~ Varl; Colorado 6ATE AERiAL PHOTQ
Gartsuiting Engineers and Scientists AU9USt 2001
~
~W~Il
+i~
! ~ I~,i ~ ~ f
+J~~~.
~
i ~
lt;i+
00
~
~
~
~i
~
y,~, e ~ tn
~
~ 1~tll' i
l%~p~, ~ j
~ ~t~~l~~
r
~ ~f(~~.`' ~-~."'r ~`~f,•'~~ ~~i~~~~ ~ ~ ~~r~~~~~~ ~ ~
i~A~
~ • ; i f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ i e ~t ~ ~
1~/ F ~J{f 4 1
' ~ ~ • • ~ k~ ~ ~ / . ~ f ~ ~ ~~p ' t f
a .~q
r
1.
+ 1
~ \
'Iz.
t~ "I,
~ ; t ~ ' 7~',,,,~-1~; r, j ' t
~ -"~s+ w o
} /i~ ~~f jyj ! +j 7 ' L6 W
,
i''l
~
~
,IQ ppeC1 dIX A
Conservation Status Handbaok, 1999
Eagle CQUnty, Colorado
p, 147- 149
~
Stewarf Environmenfal Consulfants, lnc.
Caunty: EagIe ~
AZI°lphl27iai'lS CivHP Status and Ranking Regulatory Status
Scientifie Name Camman Name Tracking Gtabad State Agency Federal 5tate
Status Rank Aank 5ensitive Status Status
Beifo borens pcp t 6oreal toad (Southem Roeky Ylountain Y G4'I7R 5i FS C E
popularon)
Bixdg C;VHP Status and Ranking Itegulatory Status
Sc'rentiFie Name Common Name Tracking GFobaI State Agency Federal 5tate
Status Rank Itank Sensitive Status Status
Accipitrr,qcnti'7is tiurthemGUShawk W G3 S3$, FSjBL
Aegj1i4s1'4nerrus $oreal dwl P G5 S2 FS
Arrrpliispiznbelti SageSpax*ow p ~5 S3151
8iecey7ulln islnridicn Bazrow's Gcldene}'e Y GS S2B, BLM SC
Cypseloides i:iger Black 5wift y G4 S3$ PS
Fnlcfl Yeregrinus Rnntuui American Feregrine Falcon Y G4T5 538, LE
Gnis canafensis tnbidrt Gseater 5andhiIi Crane Y GST4 SZB• FS T
F15h CNHI' Status and Ranking [tegu[akor}* Status
Scientific Name Common Name Tracking G1obal Stake fEgency Pedexal State
Status Rank Rank 5ensitive Status Status
Giin roUusta roundtait chub Y G2G3 82 BLM SC
Oncarltynclius clnrici plerinticx[s Colorado River cutthroat trout Y G4T3 53 FS/Hi. SC
Njammals CNHP Status and Ranking ReguIatory Status
ScienteficPlame Cammonltiame Traefcing Glabai Skate Ageney Federal State
Status Rank Rank Sensitive Status Status
Gula gulu wolvenne Y G4 Sl FS E
Lyai canudensis lynx Y GS 51 FS E
Pltcotus tQitpnSenetii pa[(eSCCns Townsend's big-eased bac subsp. Y G4T4 S2 BLM ~
Mt1SS21S 3Iid SItd11S CitiHP Status and Ranking ReguEatory Status
Scieatific PVame Common Naine Tracking Globat S#ate Agenry Fedcral SFake •
Status Rank Rank 5ensitive Status Status
Lymnaers stngnalis swampy lymcraea Y GS S2
P1aI1t CommuL1lhES CNHP Status and Ttanking Iiegu]atory Status
ScientiFic Name ' Common Name Tracking Globai 5tate Agency Fedetal 5tate
Status Rank ILank Sensitive Status Status
ABfES I.f1S!lJCAlZPA-['lCEA ti9ontane Riparian Foresu Y G5 Sa
ENGEZMr1NN17JALNllS INCANt1
Al3FE5 [.r1510Cr1V,9,-PiCLri Monsane Riparian Forests Y GS S5
ENCEL1vL4N1VIf/MERTEN5IA CIL1A7'A
A8tE5 LASIOC.qRFA-PECEA Montane fZipazian Foresk Y G5 54
ENGELARAN °V!I/5AL1?C
DR1.1"4MC1IW'U'lnNA
ALAiL'S t:v'CANri>CORL'l15 SERlCEA Thinieaf Alder-Red-Oiser Dagwooci Ripartan Y G3G4 53
5hrubland
ALNl1S l1VCANA/MESdC FOAB Thinleat ,alclec/Mesic Forb Riparian Y G3G4Q 53
Shruoland
&ETLILR OCClpE1VTALlS/ME51C FORB' Fclothills Riparian Sfarvbland Y G3 52
CrlfiDrl:YflNE Adpine 4Vetlands Y G4 54
CO RDIFQLlA-MER7'ENSl.A
CAREK RQLiATII.iS Montane YJet Meadows Y G5 94
~
147
CA1ZEX 5COPLlLQRUM-GLTNA Alpine lN'etlatlds Y G4 S4
~ 11P7'C75IP.3iA
C;1REK il?RlCLIUiTA BeSked Sedge h4arrtane 4Vek Iwleadowa Y GS 54
Ci?RNUS 5cf2dCEA FoohthilIs Riparian 5hrublanci Y G4 S3
CAN7'HONrA IiVTElLNfED1A N[ontane Grassfancis Y GU 5354
L7,ESCHA.ebfASlA Mesic Alpine tileadows Y GLP gi]
CESi'fTOSA-L!G U5 T1CUM
ELEOCHARIS Qi1FPv'QUEFLORri Alpin.e 41`etlands Y G4 S3S4
jLlPv'IPEfti15 Xeric 4Vesterr, Slape Pinyon•juniper Y G5 SU
QSTEOSAEFLNfA/r+SR'"ct141SIA Waodlanus
JG`NfPERL'S SCOFULCJRLI&1/CQRNLfS Riparian lN'oou'Sanci Y G4 S2
SERlCEA
PdCEA PlL'v'GEN5/ALNL'S fNCAN,a Montane Riparian Forests Y G9 53
PfNl15 EC7UL.5-fLlNrAER;1S 7Ceric 4Vestetn Slape ['inyon-Jvrriper Y G1J SU
05TEOSPE.WA/ZT1T'A CONLhTA Woodlands
PDf'ULLi5 ANGtfSTIFOi.fA-f'tINIPERi.fS hIosttane 2iparian Forest Y G2G3 52
SCQP LlLORUM
PGf-LlLLIS r4NGU5TfFQLFA-AICEA Moc3tane Riparian Forests Y G4 S4
PLfNGENS/r1LN(15 ;NCANA
nOP:lLClS ANGilSTlFOLfA/AL151U5 Montane Riparian Foreat Y G3? 53
lNCr'u'VR
POPULZlS ANCi15TfFC7£.IA/CORNLI5 Cottonrvood Riparian Forest X G4 S3
GERfCEA
POPi1Li15 Alv'GtfSTIFQLIrl/SAL(X Narrowieaf Cc3ttnnwpod Riparian Forests Y G7 51
ERlOCEPHAI.A Uq(2,
Ll CilLPFOLFA-SNE nNERDIA
POPULUS T'REN1ClLOif3E5/ACER Mnnkane Riparian Forests Y C2 5152
GL4l31tLlM
QUERCPIS GAMB£L11-P.MELANCHlE2 Ivfixed Motutta6n Shrubland Y G3G5 SLF
uTAHENSIS
StiLdX Lower Mantane Willow Carrs Y G3 53
QR L!,'44M0NDlRN&CALAM.4 G 7d(]ST[S
CttNADF?JS15
~ SALdXIJRU.'GEMONDfANA/MESdCFORB Drumnmanc3sWillow/Vtes'rcForb Y G4 S4
SALIX EXdGCiA,BARE GROLND Coyote Willow/$aref;round Y CS SS
SALlYMC7,NT'lCpL,q/GqL.4MAGROSTIS Montane W6llow Carr Y G3 53
CAN.4 D EN515
SALIX MOa'JTICOL4ICr1REX Mantane Rigaaiart Wi6iow Carr Y G3 53
f1Tldl CUi.r§ TA
SALIX MOcV7'ICDL-4JMESIC FORE Ivlontane Riparian Willow Carr Y G3 53
SALlX PCANIFOLdA/G4L14MAGt{pST15 Subalpine Ripardan Willow Cars Y G3 53
Cri NADE,USIS
SALlX PLrtN1FOLfA/CALTHA Subalpine Riparian WiIIow Carr Y G4 S4
LEPTOSEPAl,A
5ALlX WQLFtf/C.4RL-:C LlTR1CULATA 5ubalpine RipazianWiilow Carr Y G4 53 .
SHEPHERD[A ARGENTEA Fovthills Riparian Snrubland Y G3G4 Sl
PltllltS CNHP Status and Ranking Regulatory Status
Sc3entific iVame Common Name Tracking Global State Agency FederaP State
Status Rank [tank 5ensitive 5[atus Status
6otnjchiurar lunnrvr Cummon Maonwort Y GS S2S3
Cyprrpedium fnscicxtnkuta Purp{e Lady's-Slappcr Y G4 S3 FS
Drrrbn reei:fi^¢ictn hdountain Whidow-Grass Y G3? S2
En`ophorun: alfnitwn vnr rzeogni.~smt Altai Cotton°aass Y G4T? 53 FS
Gyiltnocarpiuar: dnJopteris Qak Fern Y G5 5253
Lianrtorciiisensifofia Canyvn 6ogAachid Y G4G5'I'3? 53
Listernbayer+fis NorthernTwayblade Y G4 52 BLM
~
148
Lyco.vadiur,ri nnno[rMcrrI vrsrpscngeris 5tiff Clvbmass Y G5TU SU
Lympor:'iscrn du5uen+ Stiff Clubmass Y G'sTC: sU ~
Pensieratort c~~atiwpiiorus ?4licidle Pazic 3'ensxemon W G3G4 5354
Peesstetiionfuirrirlgtariii FiarringtanHeardtongue Y G3 S3 F5/aL
PlntmztlLera spnrsiflorrr anr ensi fvlin Caslyon Bog-flrchid Y G4G5T3? 53
~
~
149
T
6
Otis Ode11
- Odell Architects
32o65 Castle Ct, Suite 150
Evergreen, CO 80439
August 24, 2 0 01
I7ear VIr. Odell,
:4t yau request Montane Environmentai Solutions Ltd (Montane) visited the
proposed affordable housing development located at the `Niountain Bell site', on
. August 23r'd, 20oi. The gurpose of the rrisit was to review an area identified in the
draft Entiironmental Impact Report (EIR) as a narrowleaf cottonwood
community with a potential for containing wetlands.
~ It was aur finding that although nQt extensive, there w°ere some areas of the
woodland that did have the potential for bein~ ~wretland,s. Ta identify wetland
areas areas, we propose ta conduct a jurisdicrianal wetlancis delineation in a
£ormat aceeptable ta the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps).
Fram our visit yesterday it appeared that jurisdictional wetland areas (areas
under the jurisdiction o£ the L?S Army Corps of Engineers) are probably rather
` limited and tivould therefore be likely to fall inta the `Natianwide Permit' category
of federal permitting. The Nationwide Permit system is a streamlined permit
, system for small impacts, not considered to be of significant environmental
imgact.
Do not hesitate to cail if you have any more questions. We laak forward to
4vc,rking with you further on this project
Sincereiv
Nicala R.Zpley
~
@7/14i2022 14: I8 9766413235 AR7 MEARS PAi:E 01
AR1'HUR L MEARS, P.E., INC.
Nanuai Hazards Cozsul=ts
sss councy Road 16
~
Guanisvo, Coioradrl 81230
TeliFax:47Q-641-3236
~Ytineasa~rmii.ca~4
I
July 10, 2002
Mr. 7ony N utsch
Odeil Archtects, P.C.
32065 Cas#e Court, Suite 150
Evergreen, CO 80439
Dear Mr. Nutsch: -
'At yovr reques# I reviewed the wcancep# graClrng plan" dated 7f08102 artd yo(ir
new "arcttiiectural site plan" (urtdated) and carnpared these wi#h earfier plans I
reviewecf ttiis past winter. I o#fer the follawing general oomments.
' . i
1. Buildin~~ avout. The rtew layot,t is Iess exposewd to debris flows than #he ;
earlfer cme. Buiidings have been shifted to the east, cansequenty the mos# ;
seriousily-eaposed building site has been eliminated. Buifding A(directfy
aelow riie Ntk. Be1l building) may reguire svme site-specific debris flow
mitigation which could be achieved through dir+ect reinfarcernent. Atcorclirg ~
to Tewr o# Vail rockfall maps, building C rrray be wftin a"moderate sev(lrity"
rocktall area. Mitgatian at this site cvuld cansis# of dirsct prc7tection from
rcc,sfal1. Such mi#igaticn cuuld easily be accomplishheti and can ae addrtssed
. during f;nal dasign.
2. Pa_ _ rkin-q area_ Aporfion of tMe proposed parkirg area is within tfie Middlf,
Creek debris flow hazard area. This facility tan aiso be pratecter# by direct
reinfnrcement fordebris flow impact and sta3ic #oads.
3. Conforniance wi#h Vail hazard ardinance. Mitgafiian details have not be43rt
sspecified as finaf design details are corrtinuinq to evolve. Wawvver, 1 am
confidejat, given the curren# pians, that any mitigatian at this site can be iulfy
compiiant with Chap#er 21 of the 1998 Vail hazard reguia#ivns.
. Please corttact me if you or the Tawn af Vaif have additonal ques#rons. I Eos~ic
fiorward #0 4yoflcing with you as fhis praject develops.
Sincerely,
O~114.
ArEhur 1. Nfears, P.E.
Cc; Qavid Jushman (303-463-9329 )
Cc: Mlcha44 Coughlin (303-863-7100) ~
Mu.cs Wa,T,tinq •AvaPcraCllss •Ava7anch.t Comma[ Ertgineering
Attachrnen#: H
Koechlein Gonsul#ing Engineers, Inc.
' wr~ ¦ ¦
~Cons~~~~g Geo~echnica! Engineers
12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Sui#e 115 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845
LAKEWOOD AVON SILVERTHORNE
(303) 989-1 223 (970) 949-6009 (974) 468-6933
. (303) 989-0204 FAX {970} 949-9223 FAX (970) 468-6939 FAX
August 23, 2001
Odell ArChiteets, P.C.
32065 Castle Court, Suite 150
Evergreen, CQ $0439 ,
Subject: Preliminary C',eotechnicai Investigatsan azaci Geologzc Hazard Studies
Proposed Developmant - 6.5 A,cres
Middle Creek Villaae at Vail
ti'ail, Colorado
Job Na. 01-136
As requestcd we have performed a preliminarv geoteehnical investigation and geologic hazard study f4r
the subject property. Tkle purpose of this letter is ta present our general canclusians regarding the
~ prelitninary geotecrinical investigation and geologic hazards.
VVe anticipate tlaat the subsurfac;e cQnditions iku•aughout the develapn-ient tivill consist af Qranular alluvial
soils. These soils should safely suppQrt spread footing foundations and slab-on-grade floors for the
proposed stnzctures. Excavation of these sails will require heavy-duty construction equipment. It fs our
opinioxi, that development of this site will requiee typical mountain construetian techniques.
Bascd on current ancI pravious geologic hazard studies, the stzbject site is witllin a rack fall liaxard and a
debris flow hazac-d. Fortunately, both af these gefllogic liazaz`ds can be suecessfully mitigated, ror
additional iiafoi-matiotr regarciing pzelzminary geotecl3nical recommendations and ;eologic hazards refer
to our Preliminary Geoteclinical Investigatiaii and Geologic Hazard Studies report, dated August 23,
2001.
We appreciate the opportunit}r to pravicie this service. If we can be of further assistance, please contact
our of#ice.
KOECHLETiN COTISULTING ENCINEERS, INC.
5cott B. Myers, P.E.
Project Engineer
I
~ (8 copies setit)
KOECHLEIN CrDNSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. .
CONSULTINCr GEOTECHNIC4L AtVD tI~.CATE17IALS EiVGf11+EERS
~
PRELIMINARY GEQTECHi`dICAL TNVESTIGA'3'ION
AND
GEC]LC7GIC HAZARD STUDIES
PROP05ED DEVELOPMEN'T - 6.5 F1CRE
IVIIDDLE CREEK VILLAGE AT VAIL.
VAIL, COLORADO
ap ,*~,1~~111,11iNtHltflflf~Fry~~r
A EG f~'
~ '
f 4+w+w"~
.~lC 1
~
y~Q'? ~~~..~d 1 i~tir ~
w ~
- f •'~j~~-~,~rr`~e rrs~t~'~~,~~w
Prepared for:
C)dell Architects, P.C.
32065 Castle Court, Suite 150
Evergreen, CO 80439
3ob No. 01-136 August 23, 2041
~
DL•'NVER: 12364 West A!'areaeda P1•krvy., Suiie 1I5, Lukeivood, Co. 80228 (303) 989-I223
A VOYV; (910) 949-6009
SILJ%EIt7fIOn:tiE: (971) 463-6933
A4,gust 23, 2()01 IfOf:CllLLI]V CDfY:S'ULTIIVG ENGI,'VEER3', !lYC.
JobNo.Ql-i35 C'orrsultireg Ceolecl:nicu! Engiiieers
~
TABLE aF coNz~ENTs
SCOPE i
EXECUTIVE SUMNIARY 1
SITE CUNDITIONS 3
PRC?P05ED I)EVELOPMENT 4
GEOLOGIC HAZARD STUDIES 5
INVESTIGATIO-N S
SUSSURFAGE CflNDiTiONS fi
GROIJND WATER 6
CONDITIC}NS 1NFLUENCIP»1G PROPOSED DE'VELUPMEN'I" 7
F{?U-NDATI{3N5 8
FLC}aRS 9
UTILITY CONSTRUCTIClN 9
SITE WVORK 10
Gener 1 d
u lo es 14
Fjtl 11
~ Retaining Walls I i
SITE DR.4INAGE 12
PREL,IMINARY PAVEMENT I3ESIGN 12
Pi•eliminarv Flexibte Pavement Desi~an 13
Prelimtnan Rigid Pavement De5ign 14
FURTHER I'JVESTIGATIOn' 15
LIMITATIC?N5 15
VICINiTY MAP Fig. 1
SITE PL.AN Fig, 2
CiJRREiNT GEOLOGIC HAZARD STiJDY Appendgx A
PItEVIQUS GEOLOGIC HAZARD STUDIES Appendix B
~
August 23, 2001 Xi1ECfILEliV CD.NSG'LTINGENGI,'YEERS,1?V'C.
]ob ]vo.Ql-136 Consullirtg Geatecltiticul Efigineer•s
~
SCOPE
This repart presents the results of a prelirninaiy geotechnical investigation for the
prappsed cornrnercial development of 6.5 acres located in the Mountain Bell Site in Vail,
Colorado. ' The approxirnate szte 1QCatiQn is shown on the Vicinity Ivlap, Fig. l. The
purpase of the investigation was to evaluate the subsurface cflnditions at the site and to
pravide preliminaiy geotechnical recc3rnrnendations for the proposed develflpment,
This repork includes descriptions of anticipated subsurface soil and ground water
conditions based on adjacent properties and our experiertce with similar projects, the
geoteclunical conditions infiluencing Che praposed development and recommendations tor
develdprnent of the site. 'rhss report presents anticipated subsurface conditions for the
~ proposed development, Slte speciftc geoteclanicril investigAtions sltoicld he perfat-mecl for
itadiviclisal bzcilding sites and pavernent stiibgrade, as recontmended in tlzir report.
A sumanary ot our investigation findings and conclusians is presented in the
fallowing section.
EXECLTTIVE SUVIVIARY
1. Baseei on adjacent properties and ouar site reconnaissance, we anticiptite
that the subsurface conditions will cansist of ei#her topsoil or existing fill
uncierlain by alluvial soils. The alluvial soils should be characterized by
mediural dense to dense, sand and gravel with ccabhles and boulders. LVe
anticipate that the existing fill will be eharactezized by a laase ta meditzm
dense, sand and gravel with cobbles.
~
August 23, '1100 l KDECHLEI.V CQ;'rg ULTIA'G EYGI,YEERS, I.VC.
Job Na.Ofl-13G Caasstelting Geoteefinrca! ,E?tgirzeers
~
2. Because Middle Creek appears to have been rechanneled to its eurrent
location, it is possible that grQUnd water could be encountered in isolated
underground channels throughaut the groposed cleveloprnent. Refer to the
C-'xROLTND VVATER section of this report far additional details.
3. Tsvo buildinas with associated amenities and utilities are currently located
on the subject site. All existing foundations, slabs-on-grade, utilities and
associated fill should be removed to exp4se the natural soils prior to
constructian af the proposed development.
4. Based on our site reconnaissance, we anticipate that existing fill will be
encountered durzng construction of the subject project, We belieue ihat
the existing £ill will be clzaracterizad by sanci and gravel with cobbles and
baulders. In our apinion, the existing fill, free of deleterious inaterial, may
be used as sfructural fitl for the development Qf the project.
5. In our opinian, the propQSed buildings within the development may be
supported by spread foQting foundation systems bearing an the natui•al
sand and gravei soils. Hotivever, because these soils are alluvial soils,
differential settlernents are possible. Refer to the FflUNIDATIORi sectian ~
of this report for mare infonnation.
6. In aur opinion, the natura] sand and gravel antzcipateci throughout the
development tivilI support slala-on-grade floars. Refer to the FLOQR.S
seetion caf this repart for rnore information.
7. Cuts up to 10 feet in height may be necessary along the access raad to the
graposed paY•king, structure. Large cut slopes, greater than IQ feei, will
need to be evaluated by a Professional G6oteGlznical Engineer, Refer to _
the EXCA'UATION section of this report for additional cut slQpe
recommendations.
8. Retaining walls and fills rnay need to be canstructed along the propased
southern parking 1ots_ R.efer to the SITE WQRK sectian of Chts repart for
additianal details,
9. [Jtilities will be irastalled for the proposed clevelopmenk. Because cQbbles
and boulders are anticipated throubhout the aevelopment, it is aur opinion
that heavy-duty excavatiofl equipment will be required to eornplete
excavations within the prnpased development.
~
2
.4ugust 23, 2003 KOECHLElti' COr'VSG'L 7'I:VG EtVGlNETRS, !.%4"C
Jobtio.01-136 Cuicsultie:g GeUterfrirlcal Engineers
~
10. We anticipate that paved roads are to be constructed for the proposed
development. The paved roads znay include both rigzd and flexible
pavements. Preliminary pavement recommendations based on anticipated
subsurfaee eonditions are presentea in the PAVEMEl'vT DESIGN section
of th2s report.
SITE CONI3ITIONS
The prcposed development is to be located on 6.5 acres in the Mountain Bell Site
in Vazl, Colorada. The site is bordered by the Narth Frontage Road Wc;st to the south and
partially by Mcruntain Bell RQad to the nQrth. The Mountain BeII Tower borders the site
ta the west wkzile Qpen space wsll border the site ta the east. The subject site is shown on
the Site Plan, Fig. 2. Two exis#ing buildings with asspciated amenities and utilities are
~ Iocated on the subject site. The buildin;s are single-storv buildings and are of wooci
frame constrzlction, Beeause of the pi-eviaus development on the site, existing #iIl was
observed thraughout thr; proposed dcvelopment in the area of the eYisting buildirags.
Existing :ill was not observ-ed in the area sauth of Mountain Bell Road, The topography
of the site consists of moderate slapes of S to 10 percent to steep sloges af 15 ta 24
percent. The Qr,rera?1 drainage of the sitc is generally to tlie south. Vegetation an the site
consists af grasses, bU5hC5, trees and aspen trees.
~
3
August 23, 2L7(7l K0ECHLEI:V Cf]!VSG'LTLYC EA'GIIYEL•'RS, INC.
JobNo.QI-23b Consulsitig GeoterJtisieud ElEgilreeYs
~
PRC?POSED DEVELOPIVIENT
The project consists af the develapment of 6.5 acres in the Mountain Bell Site in
VaiI, Colorado, A preliminary site plan for the praposed development was provided by
the Architect prior ta aur investigation. The preliminary develflpznent plan is shown on
the Site Plan, Fig. 2. We understanci that the proposed development may consist of
townhouse tvpe, rnulti-tamily, commercial buildings with associated access drives anci
parking lots, The buildings will be constructed sauth and southeast of Mauntain Bell
Raad. Parking areas for the proposed buildings will be constructed to the south of the
buildings and to the.north of the praposed buildinas. We understand that the parking area
constructed ta the north of the buildings may consist of a two-level parkine structure rvith
th.e top level being at grade. We understand that the muita-€'amaly builciings will varw ~
fiam 2 to 4 stories in licight and will be stepped ta match the existing graund surface. By
stepping the proposed structures with the existing ground surface, we anticipate that
rnaximum excavations of anly 10 feet in depth may be required. We anticipate tiiat
pen-nanent cuts and fills will be required far construction of the proposed development.
Maximuin wali Ioads were assumed to be those normaliy associated with multi-fainily
cornrnercial construction.
~
4
August 23, 204 ] fCOLCHLEI,V CO,YSG'LTlr'YG E:VGI'4ELItS,1:vC.
Jooltio.01-i-', 6 CprtsultiMg Geotecltliical Engiraeers
~
GEaLOGrc HazAxn sTUDIEs
A current geologic hazard study was perforrned far the proposed develflpment in
order to identify any geologic hazard that may e?cist an the subject site, The Geologic
Hazard Study was prepared in Ar.igust of 2041 by R. J. Irish Enganeering Geolagist and is
presented in Appendix A.
In addition to the geologzc hazard stucfy prepared by R. J. Irish, previous geologie
hazard studies for the area have been prepared. Three previously prepared geologic
hazard studies or summazies are presented in Appendix B.
INVESTIGATr0N
~ Because of thc existang buildings, shr-ubs and trees an the subject site, access to
the site with excavation ar drilling equipnnent is extremely difficult. In order to obtain
access to the site, an access raad rnust be constructed through fihe proposed development.
Because of the inaccessibility of the site, exploratory test pits or bozirags were unable tQ
be excavated or drilled aii the subject site. In order to abtain ageneral idea of the
subsurtace conditions throughout tlle subject site, an engineer from our office
reconnoitereci the site on August 14, 2001. The engineer absarved the subsurface
conditions exposed within euc slopes throughaut the proposed development and observed
the soils on the expased ground surface. The subsurface e;andi#ians abserved ciuring our
field reeonnaissance werc carnpared ta subsurfzice conditions encauntered during aur
~
~
August 23, 200 ] KO,ECHLEIN COtV:SL'`LTl:VG E:'VGIrVEERS, Ii!`C.
1uaNo.0 1-136 Coitsuldt"ttg Ge4techriicnf E?egiiseers
~
investigakions of nearby sitES, The anticipated subsurface conditions presented in this
report are based on aur site recannaissance, information fram nearby soil investigations
and our experience with similar Iaeations within the Vail area. FT/7ien access ta the site
has been constrttefed, we recornrizend that a sate specific irtvestigation be perforrnecl. YYe
recommencl that site specic geotechrzical investigatioris be perfar•fized for each bzcaldirzg
at zhe tirne the btaildtngs czr'e bezng desigriecl. In addition, ywe r•eco»amer°td that rz filictl
satbgr•acle and paventcnd investigadion be perfor•»7edfar tlie pi-crposed access roacls pnd
parking ar•ecrs: If requesied, we can perfonn t11e additional investi4atians.
SUBS[1RFACE CQNDITIONS
Based an our experience with near•bY Projects an.d our site reconnaissance, we ~
anticipate that the subsurface conditions will consist of eith.er topsofl or existing fiIl
underlain by alluvial sails. The alluvial soils should be characterized by medium dense to
dense, sand and gravel with cabbles and boulders. We anticipate: that the existing fill will
be character'szed by a lopse to meclium dense, sand and gravel with cobbles.
GROUND WATER
Because Middle Creek appears to have been rechanneled to its current location, it
is possible that ground water eould be encountered in isolated undergrc+und cha,tuiels
thraughout the proposed development. However, ground water encounterec3 during the
~
6
August 23, 2001 KOECHLE1;1' C0,+4SC'LTIIVGE/4'CI1~'EERS, L'dC.
Job `Vo.fl]-136 Cofrsultirtg Gevlecljnicu! EPtgineers
~
development of the project can generaliy be controlled by uszng standard excavation and
trenching ter4iniques. Therefore, we do not antzcipate that ground water wiil adversely
affect the proposed dsvelaprnent.
CON1]ITIC?N5 INFLUENCING PRQPOSED DEVELQPMENT
Construction af the development wi11 require excavation ofthe zaear surface soils.
We anticipate that these soils will consist oF the medium dense to dense, sand and gravel
with cobbles and boulders. Because co6bles and boulders are anticipated, rt is our
opsnian that heavy duty cozastnaction equipment Gvill be required to compdete the
necessary exe,avataons.
~ Due to inaceessibility of the site at this time, exploratory test pits or borings v+rere
not excavatecl or drilled in the proposed develQpment. The antieipated subsurface
conditiflns presented in this repoz-k are based on aur site reconnaissance, information frorri
nearby soil investigations and our experience with sirnilar locativns within the Vail area.
YYhen access ta the site Izas been constructed, we recommerzd thcrt a site specifac
irivestigation be pelfot-rtaecl. fVe recorrtrnend that site specific geateclanieal investigettians
be perfarmecl far each btcildirzg trt the trrre the bttrldings are befng designed. Ir3 adtlltiora,
w•e recommend t1Tat afinal subgrade and pavement anve,stigation be per, f'arrned for ldie
proposed aecess f°oczcls and parlsintg areas. If requested, we can perform the additional
investigatzons.
~
7 ,
August 23, 200 [ ICQ'(`CiiLElrv CQ,'VSLrI.TItVG ErVGIl4'ECfiS, !,'4'C.
JtahNff.Ol-]3G Cotasuitiug Geoteslrrricaf F.ngineer.e
~
FOUNDATIONS
We anticipate that the materials at potential faunda#ion elevatians will cQnsist of
either exzsting fi11 or sand and gravel wiih cobbtes and bQUlders. In our Qpinion, the
existing fill will not safely support foundations for structures bV1th1I1 the proposed
development, Therefore, alI existing foundations and associaEed fill must be removed
frQm the propQSed development pnor to eonstzuctiean.
We belieae that the anticipated sand and gravel will safely support spread fQotings
for the proposed builc3ings within the developznent. However, because tlie anticipated
natural soils are alluvial soils it is possible that loose, silty sanci pockets or layers could
be encountered beneath the proposed development. Foundations constructed on these
types of soils can experience Iarge differential settlements. Provided that no Ioase sand ~
pockets or layers are encountez-ed beneaEh the proposed faundations, it is our opinion that
the anticipated sand and graveI tivill safely support spread footings for the proposed
buildings within the development. We anticipate that spread fQating foundation systems
for the huildings within the proposed clevelopment may be desioned with a maximum
allowable bearing pressure varying from 2,540 psf ta 6,000 psf. The allotivable bearing
gressure will depend on the amount of cobbles and boulders within the building enyelope.
The maximum allowable bearing pressure can be better de~'ined during the site speci#'ic
investigatians.
~
, 8
August 23, ZOQI ftOEC}ILE'I:V CdNSL'LTINGE:YG1;1'EE3tS, INC.
Jo6tio,0l-136 Cafrsulliitg Geatechnieuf Eftgir:eers
~
FLooRs
Tlae materials at the potential floor slab elewatians znay consist of togsoil, existiztg
fill od- sand and gravel, In our opinion, the existing ill or topsoil will not safely support
slab-on-grade floors. However, the naturaI sand and gravel will safely support slab-on-
grade floors with a low risk of movement. The presencE of loose, siity sand poekets or
layers wzll have less oF acl impact on slab-on-grade floors, However, if these pockets ar
layers are eneountered, they shoulcfi be reinoved and replaced with properly moisture
conditioned and Gompacted fill.
UTILITY CONSTRUCTI0N
~ Construction of utilitzes below grade will require Ehe excauation of the near
surface soils. We anticipate these soils tivill consist of topsoil or existing fill underlain by
sand and gravet with cobbles and bouldet•s. Because cobbles and bflulders are
anticipated, it is our opinian that heavy-duty construction equipinent witl be required ta
complete the necessary excavatzans for utilities, Sand and gravel soils without ground
water classify as Type I3 soils in accordance with OSHA regulations. OSHA regulations
shauld be folla«red in any excavation.
~
9
Augusc 23, 200I IfaECHLEI;Y CCJ;V'Sb'LTP~VG L".1'GIoY,E"EItS, I.Y'C.
lqbNo.(}I-l36 C'ai+sulting Geatechnicul Efigir:eer•s
~
SITE WORK
-Q-eneral
Construction of buiIdings and access zaads may require cuts and fiIls to
obtain the desired grades. Any cut ar fill slopes gxeater than 10 feet in height should
be evaluated by a Professional Geotechnieal Engineer. Retaining wall systems may
be required in some areas to reduce the extent of cuts and fiils. We anticipate that
an-site sand and gzavel may be used in fzll areas. Proper moisture treating of the
natural soils r;vill be required prior to ar during placeinen.t and s:ornpaction of fi11.
Surface drainage shauZd be carefully evaluated during desibn and
con$truction of the propased development. Slopes around retaining walls and
buildinUs shauld be graded so that Pasitive drainage is maintained away from these ~
4
structures,
t Sla es
Any cuts, which are greater than 10 feet in height, should be evaluated on an
indiviciual taasis. If requested, we can perfan-n the evaFuation of these slopes. In
general, slopes of 2.1 (horizonta] ta vertical) up to 10 feet in height should be stable
on tYie subject site, if properly drained. Surface drainage should be carefully
cfesigned ta divert surface water away from the slapes. All cut slapes shauld be
vegetated as soon as poss's1~le after cansiruction.
~
10
Augusr 23, 2001 XOECHL.El.M1'CO:VS ULTI,`r`CENGII4'EEl25', IrVC,
1obNo.01-136 COi1SllllldTg G@QrECIt]tLC¢I EltgtllPQ7'S
~
Fill
Fills over 10 feet may be required far thrs developxnent. Any fi31 slope
greater than 10 feet in height shoulci be evaluated on an individual basis. If
requesterl, we can perform the evatuatzan of thesa slopes. In general, fill slopes af
2; I(honzantal to vertical) up to 10 feet in height stiould be stable, if properly
drained. Fill rnay consist af anticipated an-site sand and gravel free of deleterious
materials ar an approved irnported granular filI. No cabbles or boulders larger than
12 inches should be placed in fill areas. Fili areas shoulci be stripped of all
vecetation, topsoil, existing faundations and existing fill. The resulting surface
~ should be searified and properly rnoisture conditioned and compacted. Fill should be
placed in thin loase lifts, moisture conditioned to witlzin 2 percent oF optimum
moisture content and campaeted. The degree of eoinpaction will vary depending on
the use of the fill.
Retaini g Wa11s
Retaining walls may be needed to reduce the magnitude of cuts or fills for
developrnenE of this site. The types of walls tliat are posszb3e on thzs site are
conventional concrete retaining vvalls, N1SE (mechanically stabilized earth) walls,
timber crib walls and baulder retaining walls. The retaining walls need to be
~
~1
Augus123, 2001 KQGCHLEI'YCO,YSUL7'lNGE.VGf,YEERS, IIYC.
JobNo,Ol-'.3l Coljsulting Gealeclrnical Eirgiireers
. ~
desagned to resist lateral carth pressures. Lateral earth pz'essures depend on the type
of backfll, slope of graund surface beYrind the retainin; wall, height of retainxnlg,
wall, and type of retaining wall. We can provide the design, or the geatechnical
desigzi criteria, for the retaining walls once the specific site conciztions and proposed
cQnstruction are finalazed.
SITE DFtAINAGE
Surfare drainage should be carefully evaluated during design and constructian.of
the develogment. Overall drainage of the szte is generally dotiWn to the south.
Construction areas should be carefully sloped to reduce the possibility of infaltzation of
~
surface water into the cut and fill slopes. In addition, slopes araund retaining wails and
,
buildings should be graded so that positive drainage is maintained away £rom these
structures at aIl times. The surface drainage oEthe cievelopment should be evaiuated prior
to establishing final brades,
PREk.YMINARY P AVEMENT DESIGN
It is anticipated that the roads ana parking areas within the dcvelogment will lae
paved. Based on tlze subsurface conditions, it is our apinion that flexible asphalt and
rigiri cancrete pavemenis are possible, it nas been generally found that cancrete
pavements tend to perforrn better than an asphalt and base course paveinent. The initial
~
12
,august 23, Zaai XOL'CHLEI:V COjV'SUI.TVY'cENcrNFrRs, r,Yc.
JohLNo.OI-13fi Consulling GeoFeclti:icrrl Eitgineers
~
costs are gernerally higher for concrete pavements, hawever, the long term maintenance
COStS 2fe le55.
V4'e anticipate that both tlexible pavement and rigid pavement could be used at
this site. We recommend that rigid pavement be useci in high traf~ic areas sucka as
entrances or where heavy vehicles (trasli trucks, delzvery trucks, etc.) tum ar maneuver.
Two preliininary pavement sections based on high volume traff~c and low voIume traffic
are presented for the flexible pavements. High voiurne traffic areas are considered to be
aecess roads ar fxre lanes. Law volume traffic areas are cansidered to be parking areas.
Ttie follawing sectians present design assumptions and preliminazy flexible and rigid
pavement sections. In order to praperly clesign the reqacit'ed pavemerit sectiorts, Vve
~ recomrnencl tivhen fiFial subgrade elevRiidns have beeri aGlxieved, cr firittl sttbgrade and
pavernesat investigaeivrz beperfar•rraed.
Preliinarv Flexible Pavernent DesiZn
The design o# the preliminary flexible pavement was based upon an
Equivalent Daily Laad Applicatinn (EDLA), antieipated soil propercies and the
ColQrado I3epartinent of Transpartatian pavement design manual. Prelirninary
clesign calcuiations were based on assumed engineering soil characCeristics. Based
visual abservations of the surface soils and review of soil investiga[ions in the area,
w•e anticipate that the subgrade sdils will ctassify as A-1-b soils, as defined by the
~
13
Aubust 2001 KCIECHLLI;V CplvSLiLTT,'V'G E:VGdNEERS, IltiC.
Jokl Nu.01-136 Coresuftr`t?g CeatechrrFraf LrltgiriPers
~
AASHT0 Classification system, "X"he preliminary pavement designs are based on the
subgrade soils having an AASHTO classification of A-1-b. This sail type will
generally have a Hveein Stabilometer R-value rangino frotn 50 to 75. The R-value
was estimated from the AASHTQ classification o#' the soil. Because the R-value of
tlle natural sail was assumed to be 50 to 75, the use of roadbase will not reduce the
pavement thickness. Hawever, roadbase may be required to establish a finished
grade prior to paving. The EDLA for high volume traffic for residential
developments was assum,ed to range frcam 10 to 20. The EDLA for low valume
traffic was assurned to range frotn 3 to 5. Twro flexiblc pavement designs, based an
the above inethod, are shoWn below in Table A. These flexible pavement ciesigns
inelude two full dePth asPhalt pavements. ~
Table A
Sumrnary af Preliminary Flexible Pavemenk Alternatives
firaffc'Volurne Full-Depth Asp}lalt (inches)
Parking Area5 3.0" to 4.0"
Access Roads 4.0" to 5.0" '
Noke: -
Because the R-value of the natural soil was assumed to be SQ to 75, the use of roadbase
w•i1I not reduce the thickness of pavement. Hovvever, roadbase may be required ta
establish a finished grade prior to paving.
Prelit-ninarv Rigid Pavement Desice!n
A preliminary rigAd pavement seckiQn was designed uszng the same values of
~
14
August 23, 2001 KOECNLCI,Y CONSULTI,YCE,'VGIrVEERS, lNC.
JobNo.01-136 Coiasufting Geoteehitical Ertgineers
~
~I the EDLA and R-value as those useci in the high va2urne traffic flexible paveir.ent
design. The Colorada Departrnent of Transportation pavement design manual, alang
with the above trsentioned design valaaes, were used ta detenmine a rigid pavement
sectiQn. The preliminary rigid paveinent design resulted in a design section of 4.0 ta
5.0 inches af concrete,
FL'RTHER INVESTIGATION
Due to inaccessibilitv of the site at the time of this investigation, exploratory test
pits or borings were not excavated or driiled in the proposeci development. The
anticipated subsurface conditions presented in this repart are based on aur site
~ recannaissance, information frorn nearby soil investigations and our expezience with
similar locations tivithin the Vaii area. Wlaen access td the site has heelz constructed, kve
I
I
i
t-econzmend that a site specific inuestigation be perfornzed. YYe recomntend tlxat site i
specific geoteclinical investigcrtiol2s be perforn2ed for eacls 6aiildrrag at tlae tirne flze
' btcilclirags are beirzg destgried. In adclition, yve reeomrner:cl t}tat a final stlbgrctcle ancl
pavenzent rnvestigation bc peaforntcd for the pr-oposed access i•oads and par•kiyrg areas.
If requested, wc can perform the additional investigations.
I
LIMITATIONS
The anticipated subsurface conditians presented in this repart are based on our site
~
'
15
August 23, 2001 Xt3ECIiLEI,'Y CU.'VSG`LTlNG.E'IVGlNELRS, LNC
JoqNo.0(-136 Crexsuftirag GeutecleeiicaE E+tgirteers
~
reconnaissance, information from nearby soil investigatians and our experience witFi
similar locations within the Vail area. Variatians in the subsurface condicions from those
assutned i-n this investigation are passible. Any variafions that exist beneath the
development generally become euident during site specific investigations. This report
presents tkze anticipated general subsurface conditions and guidetines for planring and
desi;n purposes. YYlieti uceess to tlae site has beeri cansci-ttctedr i-ve r•ecompazerid tliat a site
specific investigazion be perfarrraed. YYe r•ecnntmend tIia1 site specifrc geoteclinieal
investigations be perfarnaed for eaeh btiildtrig at tlae tiraze the bziildings are being
clesigned. In adrlilioli, tive reeommend tdant afinal szrbgt-ade aiidpavelnent investigcrtivrz
be perfa3•rned far the proposed access roads and parking areas.
~
~
16
Aubusc 73, 2001 xoEctlL Fr;v eo;vsULrrNc E:NGr;Yrrns, LVc.
JobNo.01-i36 Cvr=s•ulting Centecizajlcul Liigliieers
~
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service. If we can be of further
assistance in disctgssina the eontents af this report ar in analyses of the proposed
developrraent from ageotechnical aspect, please contact our office.
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGNEERS, FNC.
1~yti~tflfif!^ii~t~tlrifj
~ 'ti • ~ y '1Y`+~ tl' -j
J ~
r + 4
~~1
• d Z
i~~,r • J~L~~ I ~~'i
! {("~r '1
~~~~.a?~~''~~
1
~'%<<,,`S'r13,V AV
t~' ~Jn
Scqtt B. ~y~ers, I'.E.
Pro}ect Engineer
~ Reviewed 6y:
RX1.1 /Z i~vz~
tiVilliam N. Houlette, P.E.
Senior Engineer
copies seni)
~
17
KDECHLEIM CONSUL7ING ENGIM1IEERS, [NC,
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
~
, ~ .
~
~
I
L7C 3+tut 4-75% -
Lam -
~ r
I-
_ . ~ v . , . _ . . . . . . . . . . .
SITE
NOT TD SCALE
~ VICINlTY IVIAP
JOB NO. 01-136 FlG. t
August 23, 2001 XOECHLEI.IV C'ONSULT/1L'G E':VGtrVEERS, li'VC:
JobVo,0I-136 Consutling Georechnical Engiixeers
. ~
APPENDIX A
CURR.ENT GE()LUGIC HAZARD STL'DY
~
' -
i
I ~
~
7101 UYest Xale
Avenue No. 601 R. J. Irish
penver, Colorada 80227
303-986-6658 Consulting Engineering
~ Geologis#, inc.
I
T august 16, 2001 '
KOECHLEIN CQNSULTING ENGWEERS
12384 VVest Alarneda Parkway
Suite 115
Lakewood, CO 80228
Re; Engr. Geologie Hazard Study, Middle Creek Village at Vail Development, Vail, Colorado.
Jab No. 564
Gentlemen:
In respanse to your call, we have geologlca[ly reconnoitered the site in Vail, Colorada,
planned for the Middle CreeK Village at Vail Uevelopment, which is to incorparate affordable,
multi-family housing and appurtenant faciiities an about 8 acres. This iTregularly shaped tract is
located in a part of the S1E2 SE114 Sec. 6, T. 5. S., R. 80 W., Eagle Caunty, Colarado, north of
the norkh service road immediately west of the Old Vailllnterstate Highway I-70 exit, and
adjacent to an existing Mauntain Sell #elephone tower (Fig. 1), ft lies at the foot af the narthern
slope of the west-#rending Gore Creek ValSey where thak slope is brsached by a canyon section
of the Middle Creek Valley. The ground surEace across the property slopes generally southward
~ at about 10:1 (hariz. to vert.) #rom Elev. 8290 #eet ta Elev. 8220 feet. The western tvu'o-thirds of
the property is forested with aspen and scattered evergreens. Some of the latter are quite
large. The eastern third of this tract is covered by sagebrush and okherbrush types.
Qur objective has been two-€ald; 1.) to generally deiineake geologic conditions across the
property and irnmediate vicinity, and to eval+aate the probable influences those conditions w+ll
have on the planned construct'son, with special reference to gealogic hazards, such as
landslides, debris flows, and rock falls, that cauld impede #he development of the property; and,
2.) conversely, to assess the probable impact of the planned constevctian on the natural
geolvgic conditions. An anciilary goai has been ta suggest means to ameliorate the risk pased
by any geologic hazards that may be discavered.
During the course of aur worft we haue stereoscapically examined aerial photographs of the
praperty and vicinity, and have gealogically reconnoitered the site and viciniky (on August 15, ~
2001). Our interpretations of gealogic conditians across the site and vicinity are illustrated by a !
geologic map, Figura 1 (attached).
1/Ve conclude that the tract to be accupied by the Middle Creek Village at VeiC C}evelopment
is subject to debris flows periodically emanating #r4m the vaEley of Mitl Creek, as well as rack
falls frarn the lower part of the adjacen# sector of the steeply inclined, nor#hern siope af the
Eagle Creek Valley. VVe assess filne debris f4aw risk to be high, and the rock fall Yrazard to be
medium, The former risk, we beiieve, could be substantially reduced ane or more of several
azternative mitigating measures. These could be selected and designed when #he final plans
for the pro~ect are developed. The latter risk could be reducEd materiakiy by hand-disladging
boulders, allowing them to roll down the hill and or?to the floor of the debris fan before buildings
are constructed on #his site.
Cqnsul;ant la Designers, Contractors, Planners
- R. J. Irish
Consuiting Engineering
~ Geologist, Inc.
5ite Geologic Canditrons
The Gore Creek Valley has been eroded inta the interbedded sandstones, SIltStoffe5,
shales and fimestones of the Pennsy6vanian-age (abaut 325 to 286 million years aga) Minturn
Formation by both strearns and glaciers. Glaciers repeatedly occupied the aalley of Gore Creek
during the Ice Frge, which began about 2 million years aga, and terminated only about 8,000
years aga in this part of the Rocky fUlountains. The glaciers deposifed marainal sails across the
lawer slopes of the valley and both glacial outwash and moraina] soils acrass the valley floor,
aggrading it by as much as 100 feet or more. The upper reach of the Mill Creek Valley was
occupsed repeatedly by glaciers also, as evidenced my multiple cirques aS the nead of the
Vafley, and a U-shaped transverse topographic profile that extends down vafley to about the
EIev. 9800-foat contour. That confiour crosses the flaor of the canyan about 2 miles upstream
from the junction of thaf va4ley with the Gore Creek Valley.
The morainal soils generafly are arr heterageneous, medium dense to dense, mixture of
sands, gravels, cobbles, and scafikered boulde6s in a silt mafrix. Mostly the soils are granitic
rock debris, but incCude sandstone, siltstone, and lionestone debris as well. The permeability of
tlais soil typically is 1ow, on the order of 1 a"5 cm.fsec., but may include lenses of much more
perrraeab9e sands and grave9s. The svils deposited by glacial meltwaters (#he glacial outwash
deposits) typically are interbedded, medium dense to denss sands and sandy gravels that
~ commonly are cobbley and bouldery. These #ypical9y are quite permeable, an the order of
!0'2 cm.lsec. t0 1 0`4" cm, sec. The morainaE s4ils blanlceting the toe of the northern slope of the
Eagle Valley adjaGent to this property are estimated to range fram, about 5 feet tfl 20 feet thick.
Since the end of the Ice Age, fast-morring floads charged with soil and rock debris
(essentially mud fflaws) repeatedly have coursed down the Nlidd[e Creek Valley, and F?ave
deposbted their bed lQads out across the flvflr of the Gore Creek Valley at the confluence of
thflse valleys where the Middle Creek Village at Vail Project is to be si#ed. 7hose flows are
referred to as debris flows. Moreaver, rnany "normal" floods have carried soil and rock debris
out onto the floor of the Eagle Valley at this confluence, as wef1.
In consequence, a de'brislalluuial fan has been canstructed at the mauth of the Mill Creek
Val(ey. bt is abaut 2000 feet long along ifs tae, and about 1200 feet wide frorn its apex in a
canyon section of that valley to its toe adjacent to Gore Creek. It is expeeted to be farmed of
torrentially interbedded loase to dense, sands, gravels, cobbles and boulders in a silty matrix.
The sails, granitic metamarphic rflck, sandstone, and siltstone debris, are expected to both
averlie and interlense with the morainal, alluvial and glacial o;.itwash soils underlying the fifoor of
the Gore Val1ey. These fan soils prabably range ta several tens of feet thick acrass the center
of the fan.
The permeability of these debris/alluvial fan so0s probably ranges widely, due to a widely
ranging "fines" content, from an estimated 10-3 cm./sec, to 10`5 cm. sec. The ground water table
in these soifs probab4e fies abaut 15 feet below the ground surFace at the southern edge of the
property, but probabfy is much deeper in the head area of the fan.
~ The interbedded, fine grained and fine to caarse grained sandstones, siltstanes, shales and
microcrystalline ta very fine grained iimestones of the Minturn Formation crop out sporadically
across the foot of the northern slope of the Gore Creek Va[fey adjacent to, and within the
2
.
R..1.IriSh Consulting Engineering
Geologist, Inc. ~
carayon section of Mi11 Greek Val6ey. These are rela#ively well indurated, strong, hard rocks.
Their unconfined carnpressive strengths, we estimate, range from abaut 10,000 psi to 15,000
psi for the sandstones and siltstanes, 25,000 psi to 30,000 psi for the limes#ones, and 5,000 psi
to 8,400 psi for #he snales. Yhe shales are anly pooriy fissiie. These s€rata are thin to thick
bedded, and their near-vertically dipping jaints typically are several feet to 10 feet apart. The
beds strike narth-northwestward and dip abaut 251 WBSt-SOlftI1WeSt1NeCd, thus nearly parailef to
the contours of the valley slope, rather than out of the slope. These rocks, including the
sandstones, have very littfe, if any, intergranular permeabifity, but ground water undoubtedly
flows along some of the joint planes.
No faults ara known to us to disrcapt the bedrock strata underfying the project area, but ?
severaf have been repor#ed in the vicinity. These are believed to he inactEVe.
Assessment of Geologic Fiazards
Debris flawage is the principal geofagic hazard atterrdant to the Middle Creek Viilage at Vail
site. In fact, this site effectivefy spans the upper sector (i. e., uphill sector) of #he debris/alluvial
fan, thus could be flQOded if a debris flow 4f "normal" flood should leap the banks of the channel
of Middle Creek at the apex of the fan at the mouth of that valley. A debris fan is depasited by
multiple debris flows, which are high-energy fEows of surface wa#er charged with soif and rock
debris. The flow is debauched from a steep-floored ravine onto the floor of a main valley, where
its bed laad is deposited to form part of a fan-shaped deposit, the debris fan. Typically a debris ~
f€aw 6s initiated by iocalized, high intensity rainfall that quickly washes ioose soif and rock from
the catchment area of a ravine or canyan. This debris is carried esserltially as a mud slurry.
Cornmonly the debris flows and the companion flood flows abandon the channel occupied by ~
the creek on a debrislalluvoal fian, spread caut across the fan surface, and even create new j
channels during some euents. These flows, both debris and '°normaa' flaod flaws, can seriously
damage ar destr4y bui4dings and their infras#ructure, as well as harrn the occupants of those
buildings.
We assess the risk of debris flows from thte Middle Creek Valley to be high' during the
lifet'sme of the project, although we cannot predict their average Tecurrence time interva82 . Tha#
recurrence time interval is likely to be quite erratic. Their volumes could range frorn srnall to
quite large because the drainage area of Nkiddle Creek incorporates about 8 to 7 square miles.
The high risk pased by debris flows, as well as by "normal" floods, could be reduced by one
or a cambination of several mitigating measures. The designs for these could be jncorporated
in your finai development plans.
Additionally, debris fan soils tend ta be subject to differential settlement when wetted, bu# ;
the potential impact of this can be moderated by fQUndation engineering practices well within the tl
state-of-the-geotechnical engineering prac#ice. ~
~
' Qur assessment of risk is couched 4n qualitative, empirically-de rived terms (hign, medium, and low). ~
The state-of-the-geologic-art does not permit a ratianal quantitative analysis.
z Ara experienced engineering hydrologist should evaluate the risk of "normal" #looding.
3
_ R. J. Irish
C4nsulting Eraginearing
~ Geo6agis#, inc,
L.arge and small boulders of gran3tic rock and limestone are scattered across the steeply
incfined surfaee of the foot of the valley slope overlooking tIne eastern half of the praject area.
Most of these appear to be embedded in #he morainal soils that blaraket that area, but a few
appear to be perched an top of that ground. Bflth couCd be dislndged by s9opewash erosion,
thus could tumble down into the praject area.
1Ne consider the risk of such an event to be medium during the lifetime of the praject. That
risk could be reduced substantial4y, wa suggest, by dislodging #he exposed boulders by hand,
utilizing a steel bar, and afFowing them to fali onto the surface of the debris fan down slope
before any buildings are canstructed an this tract. The area ta be serviced extends frorn the
narthern side of the fan surface up ta a terraced section of the slope about 150 feet in elevation
above the fan surface, and from the eastern side of the property to the eastern side of the
mauth of the Middie Creek Valley.
Boulders perched on, and partly embedded in the morainal sails acrass #he toe of the Eagle
Valley slope west of the mouth of the Mill Creek Valley may be dislodged naturally from time to
time and roll dvwn the slope, but they shou[d not travel into the vrestern sectian of the planned
developrnent area. lnstead, they are fikely ta be trapped in the channel of the creek, which
traverses along the toe of that slope. Any that may skip ovar that channel, however, should be
trapped by the dense brush and aspen West of the Mountain BeEI tawer, or impeded by the
tower buildings.
~ The soils and roe'k underfying the Eagle Vailey slope in the vicinity of the pfanned
development site appear to be relatively stable. We observed na landslides there or grflund
sur#ace cracks that might presage 6andsliding. The granular soils of the shallow sloped
debrislalluvial fan do not evidence instabiiity or irrcipient instability,
The 40-mile lang Gore Fault, a majar rrqountain-baunding struCture on the westem side of
~
the Gore Range, lies about 4 miles east of the project site (at i!s clasest approach); tha 50-mile
long Masquito Faul# lies about 12 miles to the west; and the 25-mile lang Savuatch Faul#
terminates (at its northern end) about 24 miles south of the site. Some seismolrgists consider
these 3 faults to be potentially active; but mast seismologists, nonetheless, eonsider the risk of a
strang earthquake generated by those faults or any other fault within a hundred miles a# the
praject site to be low #o insignificant during the next 140 ta 200 years. 7his is not ta say that this
par# of Co[arado is seismicaily quiescent, but the earthquakes generated by the reactivation of
faults in this regian shau[d have small magnitudes. Earthquake intensities of V to Vl, with peak
acceierations of 0.05g, we conclude, are unliicely to be exceeded at this si#e during the [ife of the
project.
So long as the constTUCtion of the planned buildings and appurtenant facilities does not
materially Change the existing ground canditions of the natural soils andlor bedrock, slope
stability should nat be impaired. If cuts or fills in excess of 5 feet high are needed, hawever,
they should be designed by a geQtechnicas engineer experienced in that work. Panding of water
on the debrislailuvial fan slope, of course, should be avoided because seepage water from a
pond could bui€d pore water pressure in the debris #an soiis, thus could t+`igger ground
i movement.
s
4 i
R. J. irish -
Gonsulting Engineering
Geoaogist, Inc. ~
Otherwise, #he construction as pjanned shaulcJ nof increase the geolagy-related hazard to
other property or structUres, ar to public buildings, roads, streets, rights-of-way, easements,
utilities, or facilities.
We have appreciated the opportunity to worK wifh you on #his project. If you have any
questions, please call.
Yours truly,
Rabt. James irish, P. G.
Consulting Engineering Geo{ogist
~
. • ,
e
i
~
J
Augusi 23, 2001 - X{7EC'HLERV Cl?NSG'LTITVG ENGI,'YEERS, I1VC:
` JabNo.01-136 Consufting Geateclanicat EngiJiesrs
~
APPENDIX B
PREVIOUS GEOLOGIC HAZARD STIYDIES
~
~
1
eu,Zi1Xu1 ey:l~ 3~3~707152 GDELL ARCtiITECT PAGE 02
DEBRIS Fz,a~~ ~D IRocUIALL RAzARD ANALySIs ,
;
Mr..J UN1 t~,L1`ir 13r.`+LL" S17 L
~
~ .
V-UL,CQLORADO
' Prepaz e~t For
~ Mr. Duane Piper
p;epa; cd By
; rsthur z. ?~ea:s, I~~.
Gunnisan, CaIorada ~
°
Movem.bcr, 1992,
~ ~
uor 4.31 Va; c4 Mef0 rtbz LllJtLL kNC;FIITECT F[iGE 03
SJMMARY .A..l'~?D IREGONIMEiV'D,ATIC'1NS
Thc iollowrng surnmarizcs the findings of th:s stvdy and provides *ccomr.n-e,ndad;ons. Additi0331
' dczait is Co;vc7 in Scctians 2- 4 of the rcport,
R4CiC7-ALL
Roc4ciail :s -;ot a potcntial haza;ci to the propcscd dcuciopmcn. as s'r,osvn on a conccpcual sitc
pian prcparr.d an 3-19T92 by AIpinc Intcrnatianal. ThiS GQnCluSiOn JS baSCA ori (hG fbZ10Wirig
~bsczvation~,:
a, c:cci;fall scurcc arras dc not cxist zbo :fc eastcrn aortion cf Ehc prapesed
d-~'"Clapf-"enf ,'.the "EaSC Par[ci"}; '
b, AIthough ,eockfall may occur abovc thw "Vr-ut Parcz;" it SuzPl cc,nsist of n~adera;c-~i~ed, rare zockfall cvcr.ts tlint wiis nor ;cach chc pro-poscd b+_+iicing.
DEBP:S FI.GWS
~
.D~-bris flows NviI! nat aSfect t~c Ewst Parccl but crt' rj~crrun (hc 1'Vcsc Parcel, n is cnncltisions
:rc bascct On thc failnwing obszrvatio;::,: .f'
a. i`hc ast Fazc-~i :s nct in linc wi(h dccsris
t. T+.w Vr';,st Parc-l is 13catcd on an 2t{uvial fan praduccd by dcbris-fiaw
cepc>s;;icn as cviden4cd by k) granite nocrlders I-- fccr lcng On rbv SLiIaGC, 2)
dcnn5;crar.ai Iobcs 5 fcc( ~igh, ancI 3) a targc saurcc axca;
C. i'iie f]ows rnay bc dcep as ;hcy a:e channc[izY;t tfL*augn fhe canyan croded ir.to
. the bcd:cyck d:!,cctIy abovr- thG 51tc. RECC)?vfM JiNDATi(JN5
, T'ne #'aiI~~virg rccamrr~cnciWtion altcrnatives are bascd cn the cnnclusions outlined abQVe and on
+~y cxpcricnce ~vi:h the dcLris-fco,.v procuss in a:~d at athcr loca:ions:
z. Avaid constru:;i-on an thc W'cst Ya:ceJ; ar .
b. I7csigr, slrvrtures an the W~st Parcel for i,mpact aad dcpositifl:aal farcGS fro:rf
dcL-ris t'Inws; or
c. Proc:ed wit~:~ nct Ceve;opme7t plans as shown on the 3--:9-92 conceYr;aa[
srudy, bxii:d no m.i!igarioz, and acc-.pk ;l~e risk ai tI.ows wi.cr rctvm pexiods af
aP ; r~acfn~atc,y 300 - 1C100 ycars chat would dama¢c ssruetures.
i
~1 . . . . . . , . ~ 1
L`L,CLL w-.v....,, . lc U U
c, ti ~ caLc+~s r7. ~4 JG.]41Uf 17L
y70 464 o454 T'ORnCtfN ,
a ~
7
~ US Uliest Wireless LLC Irerra n
a 4301 E. CQlfax Street, Suite 314
s ~rtver, Coiotadc 80220 Fon cw~,s~, c~r~~ ~ aas~ ~as0a
` (970) d84,0950 1`axr{970)484{454
i Atirr; Mr, Jason Little
~ Re: Gs4tagic Naz~ird invegtigatlorl (Rev#sian 1)
~ l1S Wesi Ge!{uiar 5ite, MTN-1CB
~ Vail, Colarado Terracrm Pr4ject No. 25585148 '
Dear Mr,l.ittle, ,
As cequestett, "Terranor, has completed a peoiogic hazard frnrestiaaf€cn for the above
refierenced sits. It is aur unde^standing ihat the exisfing US West buifdinp and tower are ta
have a sma11 addifion placed can the r1aRh side of the existing facgity. The addition is to be
a 15 ft. by 76 ft. equipment sttaltar that wi[I be k>cated at the northeast norner ai the
exis;'rr,g faciliry. 0n June 11, t998 an eneineering Aso?ogisi Fram T'errac,an performcd a site
racannaisaar?ce and re,fiewed the coty of Vai!'s debris Pvw and rock Fai1 haxard maps. '1'he
site as located in the soutt,easC quarter at 5ectiazi 6, 'Tawnship 5 Souttt, Range F3D Wesi on
the north side or Interstate 70. Ths si#s slopes modaraiely to ateeply to the smuth. A ~
creek flaws aut oi a narravr canyan that issues from the mountalms just north oi the site, t
The creek bends around the wvst sidc of the L'S MV faeihtyr. A Chiid cata faeiTity is I
[ocated eas: aY the propased facifi:y. The +extstlnQ US Weat facBily is a mu)ti-stary r.oncrete ~
i
strueture with an existiN tower. - A coracrete water divetsion swale was noted around the
rrcrh, easi, and west si#es flf the existing buikSing. ~
,
~
Tte site is located on Quaternaty (8uel Lake) age ailuvial %n daposi#s, Ttre depasi4s are ~
paoriy sorteti rriixtures afi sRt, sand, gmvel, cobbles, and bauiders. 7he grave; tn boulder ~
clasts are subangutar to subrounded and da nok appaar ta exhibil a daminani direction of •
oriantation, 7he bedrock undsrlying the Qu3ternary depasits is the Pennsylvanian Mantum '
Forrnation. The MintuTn is camprisad af red tn pink interbedded units a# sandstone. ,
congfomerake, sha?es witn some carbanate depasits. Tlte Mirtum strikes towards the
r?orth and dips approxima#elp 150 to the west. Outcrpp af the Minturn Formatior? vwere
observed appraxirnately 300 to 400 faet nor#h oi the t15 West tacifity near the movt~l ot the
cAnyon from wfiich the strearn +ssuee. ~
Trte Gity of Vail debris flow and rock iali hazard maps show the U5 MJest site being
siCuated between rack faPl haxard zbnes and eawt Df the debris ffQw hazard zcne. The rock
faf! hazard zones are mapped as being an the west side of the strasrn, and dlrec2ly
ac~aCeni to 1hG east aidv ot the srte. aassd on the hazsrd maps and crur s'rte
reconna'rssance, it is our capinlon the prnposed additiQn is not IoCatcd within either of the
Atltdta a a.CktrWS 1 G~Itsl'~~et ~ Il3aha ti I~rroif ! bw.i ~ Kanb~! ~ Mtflt4a~4r ~ A1i145urt ¦ ASdP.dM
AVwb"lk.1 11 N8mm a 19r+rfAC7em0 ¦ worc~,DaxoIo ¦NiBhd" ¦ 7*rvnS"i a TaMA! w Uk1W1 a W.UDtWq a. M'Afr*%
w?Hty EnQknsM~y 9~M.Y Tii$3
; '~fl 7I5"2 _
Ti~R1iACClIY
uariaraa fiuiv 144 I_AA UrU a84 uW04
two rock #afl hazard zones which are adjaceni #o the site. 7he cfebris flow Mazard rrap
; identifies this fxa,zard xone as cfosely following the existing course af the strearr. tt is flur
opinion thai the ettCire 41uriaf fatl upon whlCh ttts existir~,c, f2ci4ity and the propaged addition
, ere Ipcaded coutd be included ir. a debris iow hazatd zone. Nowzver, because th$ $tmam
is incised 'rntc iYs zhannal end the existing facifky hss diuersion 5#ructraares fi plaCe, ure
~ believe tne risk of debris faws affecting the faciEity ts minimal. Alsa, the proposed addition
wiN be an unoccupied stcrage ahed, fecgrn econorrric and engineerirtg perspectives, it dvef.
not appaar ihat correctiva engineerir€g vr mittigative procedures are Mrarr-anked far ttie
~ addixion, It i9 ~SO oi]~' Ctpftli~7ft #Y1af t~t~" GOITSIFUCI'J0~1 ~7f the 15 by 16 fant addtSion wiD nat
` incfease k?'ae ge4logfC hazaTdS ;v ather sinuctures cr pd'opsRies_ fiio evidence csf vther
geologic haxatds such as iandsfides, sofi Creep, ar ather forms of mass wasting wete
; observed during the si#o reconnaissanca.
~
The analyses and recommendatinns in th+s repart are based up4r~ visua) obseEVations
perfrarmed at the foCStion. The soo af seruices iflr this proJec# does nrst inGucie any
gentechnlca! *E'Cdi71T(]£'f1Gs3C141^r8 itt regarcls ta particLW consiruction met!inds ar
procedures whictt rnay be reqttired t build In this parFiwfar geolagic setting. li the client
is cancame, aboul, the gevtechnica aspects of the projeci, it is guggested that a fL(i
gecat2chri-.Bl 9tJII5 lC1VB5tlgatIL1n b$ Ae QfRled,
We appreciaie the opportuniry io wv wiih you on this pro)ect. if you have any quesiic>ns
canceming thls repcrt, or if we may oi fuEiher sarvice to yoU, please d4 ncE hesitate ta '
~
~ ContaCt u5. i
I
v ~
Sit1Cef81y, qF PAQiF . °
iERRACON Revieuved: . ;
~ d AIriG i
Daug Leafgren, C,P.G, ~4s ~.Ew sniarn J. Attwo , P.E. . •
Engtnearing Gealogist ° ~oq s +A {7ffice f+rtsnager
Copies ta: Addressee (2)
-
BEST OlWPI
~~~~ILABLE
~
OBELL ARCHITEGT PAGE 06
NIchvlas Lampiris, Ph.D.
c,brrsuLrrNG aEaWc,sT ~
0793 VALiEo' ROAD
-GARBONDAi.E,.C0LOitA.ry, d 81623
(30MG833Ed4(24 HOURS) ' M'e1~` ?8 ~ '1 ~3 r'{;S •
I•IQ: : Y F:wi:hur•Far•d ~ 11irwc;tr.~r ,
F§L;C Scham"s .
N. I'ronLage Raaiu ' .
r1_: rr[1z~ k{a 1 .1 Ev",?I ~_IPi't16f1
j?~'-a7P- ~si. Rl.itt16'I'°,tOTd: . . .
Vysl.`.?C t1'Se SStB, O~ }fU,'+r SchOG1 4+td llt7tef: CI"^t' 'f4T
p1 ann=Wtj expan=i can orr the nWrth a: de c?-f thL:A es! i-:t:, nr.;
s t1-r~;r_t ui- r~. '~hc prcpcsgd addi't:ari is ?~I-~sWi'~ un~i~r ~ep~~r~tF
T~^~~v e Etlsc i1at e6 thc- po sit:ian af th -r. s::1~~.:? 4 13, wi~h ~0 s r_;~~ct to
t",l-ip r;eolugir.: r0rk;,Fa11 hrazar-d mapplrig tftzi. X F=r"Od'.si_ov 4-:jr the ~
o-F Va: a in '1984. The schaU: i r cahEawn wi thi.n thF
Gi:ltt?gUI"y. fl'f "iFlL?df.:Y'at.Lp l'°0r-k•fe12 l h~,':CiAY`G ?,~4ti,; Iif{ %!elle39 :l d
i nczp.vzti tin i Farai iwvre that the 1 i ne hy arrt-nCed a...r. ~h ci w
t:nat your :.,,ehncl and its pr•n)7orxad iWclzti,ur, :iirE* nat: Gro:yh:,n dk
r-nc4.ia:l ha<ar•d lnnip. i+.1LLhmittcd arti cavwr1,:;rV tc, the Le,tirnini;a
rrc:e S=haal !n 1986 which shawed a n.~cu west toundary o4 tho
mappec1 IkLZa c74'Cl =CI":fr 41-trther to .hL- ea~'it r1llt~ the.`E{CYY'r- rIC}t
' i.ne:ludin'9 Your ya;ioul. Ido, hawt-ver, -Find rhar. ;:11ere: As a
:':^brit tlow
7'nag c:i;kn, and sh~i~sl,d, be mitiqaka+J xs wL ciiscus«;ad in thL-
'f;,eld 1WW)t wec1: tay e;ttending and pQr-hap~; aciding to tt-~=
E!X:isi:zi7(4 lpw, I irruir- racky hi:3.s]de , ncr••i:rlww!yt of tr~ tichoo],,
whach wao. -forrnad by aprovicuw, dvbris flm-a deeadL%s a.ga. 7h,p
Mi•t:qAttcsri can be cxtended to a pa1nt par` w,ay t~~> the V`..e?F-}:.
trillside neyond the gchcsol to provide ps~o:,'si!ction r." *;ne
r•~;•:,i ;~~:x ng tUf i Minq and the propas+ed adr1Y ti csn, ar i k Can Uo
ex terided aill •t,,)e +aay ~_c thg stL_erj hi11 !-.iLe,, tj-;L-re}'y ,
pr°ntrxcting tha pZaygrcui-id area,s nuri:h~.~A~i°k 4.c the vvl~7fl; aks
wal l. Thc carr~- igura•tian of the oerm i n *_ther~ czge sho'-~ld Ce
es t,zu 1 i 5hed i n the f;t ~ld i n concor•t w11:in ya,.;r
G4"1 h~ cKp[iC#ed to Ild4'P a f4r15hed ar,
w4-1st Ti. tc o~F ZAL)cILLt E to 1 ta r&et. ~ .
~
. J/'1rU 1 Uy: 'lw 3035707162 UDELL AP,CHITECT F'AGE 07
, ~ .
. •
~ -
Tn tf-a rcr•mer casE, debrf s wQLil C kle 4 Cir'C C-d Lin 4 Iaw araund thti
~rh~~,al a^c1 i:a7f~ prr~p~~,~!c; r;~t~c:;tic~n rr, h:alh~ r;;ides: i,r, t)-,P .l,~jttar•
•the debri, WrLt3d bal r'orcrd t~: nFlOw be:,tiUpun the
'S :.;~7 j!' C 1: y.7 rr orj L.' I" ty aIl d ti'.e M1: . Lk1E !l. 3{1 s3 r A1. lu. t;, j7 t1 t ~r t 1', t? !-lfnt.
T~ L'" Ycw,"" E' l,l I"Qb:,blV si W eZ!" E Cl'{' tt1 e F,I f]'&;' (l 1: 1 r.s t. ±•1 rl ii Il'd bF.'. C_ e;l t.l s;? th=y
t~ Y~'? 4K ~.1 ~.1 Gt
G:+i'YerE'7t3 t., ~ ! tn~I at'!d f1P.. ?•f 1 k;!'li."= i:ir, r n. ,
~'-aYp:; ct
T,f':b.1,r prtype?r'tti', tJl.;t i arff r1c7t L.C7r^~~~:i rtC:'v.13 t.hw]'C Wr:w,'~
,.'.Ui'Ldti:S.`.L'C; l•111 pl"UV;C~-- a'ifjiC.+CiUa',^.f:• i7t.;n,C:'`1;3,r.,J'1 lr"-. 1t!k!vwflt L;d4'
i~ a Y' G~ e r~ y..l~S ~ 1. :5 ~ Z o W R' fSl e"lfl ii
o ( n t Ii r_+ 71,s t c; rf u: f': C~!' 'C ~
W O t:l°14_ L Ce° ~i f O 1" !1'I l. : f.J aZ ~ 7, ~l C v E`'r el l" G° G U~- ' .
`ti: ~~E? ~~5~'C~~~ .4 ~.j1v@ d ~~L~~~ ~ ..r}~ ~t WZ 1 ~ ~ ~~r J. O~~r~':ii:al~ ~i~ '~."••:_7 t.o
nt~rer- prafavrty or btr-ucturmst or tz
p4 -'ti-Fa'y'i I'Ds1cf5, 3tr"eet5,' E:c"i5E'fISE'fi'',a~ l!tlt'i i-::i Ga9' -L'"5 0~•.
41:tier prnpert5 es of hny ~<~i nd. i,1~i~Y~~ t~.rc~ •~~.v-t.i-.~~,
C,l.1c~:1f~f1•_.~ c14A'cie do IlC7t tC?
~'1C~'lO1+3~`.7, !_Fv p :./''!w
. C;c,j in •r, t,t.l J. ris~ ~o a
~ . "
~
4 } 97 ~ , ~,~ti ~ = w
1
a ;
` 1 L 1
LN y l ~ ~ I
c ~ ~ ! ! I ; ~g `I t - - ' I ~
g
~~a r~~ ~ i ~ F . ~ ~ p~~
• ~
~fJ 1 . ~I Ci ~ ~ C ~ .
~ ~ • ~ i~ ±r , ~ a~ '
~.r I a I ~ ' f' ~ i - n.
r
• ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ ~ ~ . ~ ! -
I f ~ 7~ ~k. } q _ ~ , ~ I
~
d
. i
, I
~ ~ ;~'i! il ` • j
w ~
~ ~ f~ ~ a _y= ~ o g ~
~ ~ 2 p y ( ~
I
~ I
I
. Transportctian Cansuttants
COLC7RADO
INC.
.ruly 12, 2002
Michael Coughlin
COLiglllri & Cfl., II1C.
140 E. I 9th St,
suite 700
nenver, co 80203-10' )s
Re: Midcila Creek Development, traffic '
Dear Michael,
V4'e have reviewed the revised OdelI Architeets Srte Plan dated July 15, 2402 fvz the Middle Creek o
Vail prfljed. Wirth no change to #he number of residentiai units planned and essentially the same
access plan that we discuss in our 7anuary 24, 2002 report, ihere is no change to our previous findings
~ and recommenciations,
Since the new 7/15102 Site Plan depicts Nnzth k'rontage Road irnprovements that we had
recomunended, we have upd.ated our report ta include this plan (Figure 2). Several mznor text c.haxtges
have been made as weLl. Please find attached the July 12'b update of our January repvrt.
Please call me if you kzave any questions.
Smcerely,.
TOA Calorado, Inc.
~
~
David D. L.eahy, PE
Princigal °
cc: Lee Mason, Qdell Archite=
~
At#achment: I
820 16tfn Street MaIL Suiie 424 • Denver, GoloraCo $0202 •(303) 825-7107 FAX: 825-6004 E-Mail; TDAGoIo@aol.cam i
. I
. _
_ Traffic Impact Assessment ,
For the Yroposed
Middie Creek Residential & Early Learning Center
I3evelopment
• Vail, Golarado 0
e
Prepared fQr
Odell Architects, P.C. ~
Evergreen, Golaracdo
Prepareti by
TDA Coforado, Enc. $20 16'' Streef, SuiCe 424 '
fleuves, CO 80202
• (303) 825-7107/FAX(307) 825-6004 ~
7anuary 24, 2002
Lpdcrted July 12, 2D42
~
~
. ~
Middte Creek Traffe c lmpcrct Siudy
- ~ . Z'able (?f Cf1IIteI1t5_ .
, INT'RODUCTION I ~
EXISTING AND FIJTURE ROAD CONDITIONS.....,. ..............s..,.....,....................................,........... 4
Noxrft FxoN`raGE R0AD 4
VP:rt., ROaD 4
.
I-70 LrrmRCxatvcE RouNmws&rrs 4
E)a=~4G LF,vn OF SERV[cE 4
North Fronlage Road 4
I-70Main T/aillnterchange North RaundaGaut S
ProjecfAccess S
PRQJECT TRIi' GENERATI(3N 7
Residenticrl Trips 7
Learriing Center Trrps 7
Town Bus Trips 7
PRQJECT TRTF DISTKIBU'['I4N................................:....................................................................... S
FIITURE TRAF'F'IC CONDITIUNS 9
FuTuRE VoLuMEs 4
Fu'I'[7ItE I.EN'EL (7F SERVICE V4TTH PRO.]ECT 9
ResidentiaU'Ma BellAccess 9
EarlyLearnrng CenterAecess 9 ~
NarthFrontagel7oad, Twa-IcmeRaadway 9
~ RECQM31ENUED PROJECT R[]AD Il1ZPIt4VEMiENTS . 12
Lef? Turn Lanes 12
}Zight Turn Stvrage Larres . 12
RightfZ.ef1 TurnAcceleralion Iarrer 12
SUAIAIARY O'F FINDINGS 13
...A ~
APPENDIK A....
LEiTEL OF SERVECE WORKSHEETS, AM & PM PEAK HOl3R.S A
Figures
Figure 1 Vicinityl'vlap Z
.
Figure 2 Site Pian 3
Fig!ure 3 Existing PeaZHaur Volumes 6
Figure4PeakHourVmltim.esatBuildout ZI
Table5
Table I North Frontage Raad Peakgiour Level of Service 5
Table 2 Ve3ucle Trip Generatian 7
Table 3 Peak Hour I.evel vf Service at Buitdqut 9
~ Table 4 NQrth Frontage Raad Level af Service 10
i TDA
i
n
I
~age 1 MiddI2 CTeP.k T"RffLC Ilnpact ,S`tILdy
IIwT'TFtQBUMQ:Y ' _ , ~
This regort describes traffic conditions, now and an the fimue, in the vicinity of the planned
MzdcEle Creek residential and adjacent daycare developrnent in Vail along North Frcmtage Aoad.
1'he 6'/z-aare sloping srte is west of#he Main Vaii Rau.tzdabout adjacezrt ta the "lwia Bell"
cornmunicati[ons tawer and atx exiSting daycare c€nter, Figure I. A smgie access drive serves
bo#h existing uses. The Middle Czeek praject +ccansists af 142 affordabie apartment units and a
conttemporary eariy c.hildhovd learning center, replacuig the exiting center. The Ynix af studio, I-,
24 and 3-bedroom units is structured to the affordable (deed restricted) housing market for Vail
Vailey workers. The estimated 315 tenants are likeiy ta be singles and cauples employed in the
mountain resort service sector. Stur3io units (64 dwelIings) wifl comprisa just tmder half af the
total unit mix. As shown in Figure 2, The new ehildhood leaming center will be situated east of
the rssidencas aud will have separats access and parking. A total of 245 surface parkirtg spaces
' wi11 be provided for the residential portaan of the proj eet aand an additional 20 vsrill be part of the
leaming eenter site.
Residents will have goad alternative transgortation chaices. The site is canvenient to t3rree Town
free bus linas serVing North Frontage and the Town's transportazion center in V,aiI Village. A bus
tumout alongside the rnain ertrance wilI perniit on-site boarding and alighting. Pedestrian wallss
will connect witb the Town's trail system. 7'tie Town's in tawn bus system and t7au.spvrtation
center ara a'l4-rnile walk/bike to the east an.d south. 7he I-70 gedestrian overpass crnn,aectaon to
Lionshead ViUage is 1/2 mile (iD-minute walk) west ofthe site.
This report d,escribes the expected trip making characteristics o£tenants and day care patrons and
warkers, evaluates existing and axpected future traffic aperating canditions iu the vicinity and ~
lastiy, it addresses the need and scale af suggested access and circulaticrn improvernents.
'I7iis report contains the follawissg sedians:
+ Intraduction
+ Exisdng & Future Road Can,ditivns
• Praject Tnp Generation and Distrzburtion
• Future Traffic Conditions
• Recommended Road Tmprovexn.ents
• Summary of Findings ' APpeadix AG: I,evel of Service Worksheets
~
TDA
'113
a.. ~
- m
W
0
~ F -x x.
l' J I
. '~,/Q,PO ~?1 M :,LL
r
' o~.. r ~ ~ a • , ~
~ . G_'; a'.t,~ • y`+
-x x-
zs
QL
L~j Q4• ~
. * 4 3 1
24 ;
71YA
.
l': - ' Y ~
LL,
~ ' • ~ . ;~j3 .
I • ~c~:=t ' ~l' ry a _
I: w •
~19 .
I:X
.
S14rA~
~soN
Z Z
~ p a
~
~
F 1 !
t F
~ ( G7
! ~ ~ f l j . t 1 1o~~fc~f Ir1 c,; nt aj u" i
~Cq~a'9a'
,
~ ~ • , ~ ~ i f ~ ~ w
~
i
~t~)+'
_ j_.~•.-~ ; l t' ~ i 1 ~ r ~ , ; 1 ; . ~
~
~f f ~ ; ` ~ ' ~ 1 f~ r r+ ; ? ~ I ! ~jr t ~ ? ~
~ ~ ( c, l • ' ;'IL ! 1 ~ ~ i t " .
~ .
.f ,f+l 1J~ ll i f~~? r i CScSo
,.a,.. A' ~ e •a ~ ~ ~M
1 ~~yM~ 1 ~l ~ t , ; y~~ ` i !
%1 ~A~
a
Z 'Is
~ ~ ~ti~~ • ~ ~'M~~~~ ~p~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~,~p~~
4 ~ y ~ ' ~ ~ _ • ~ ! k t~. r' °~Fa~~~m
; ~ ~ ! , ' • ~ i t ' ~ ~
~
1 l 1 ~ t I
E ~ F q 7 ~ ; t . i ~ ! ~ ,
v^i b
qo
~ ~ -
cc
~ 1 , ~ ~ ` .C7~ ~ _ ~ j .
` Page 4 Maddle C'reek Truf,~ ImP~ Stu4
~ EXISTING ANi) FUTiTRE RQAD CoNDI'I'IONS
This secCion deserities existiug and future traffic conditions alang North Frontage Raad in the ,
project vicinity. ~r,-. , .
North Fr4ntage Road
1'darrh Frontage Road is a two-lane frantage xoad within the I-74 rig~it of way. Graded shraulders
vary from fc+ur to eight feet in widkh, It ccsuzaeets the Main Vail and VVest Vail interchanges
serving Iodgings, the Town past affice and commercial uses along the north side af the raad and
roads branching affto slvpe-side hotne sites. The alignment is esserEtially straight witij gradual verticai curves that follow the gently mlling terrain. Posted speed is 35 mph in the project ~
vicinity. Peak hour traffic counts performed recently' suggest a traffic volume of about 6,000
vehicles per day passing the site.
Vail Road
Vail Road connects Vail Village ta the I-70 interchange and the frantage roacis serving each side
nf the iIItersiate highway. The twa-Iane road flares to, add lanes at the roundaibaut approarhes.
South of interchange twe-lane Vail Road intersecticrns wrth West meadaw Dnve and Willow
Road ara Stap-sign controlled.
I-74lnterchange Roundabauts
The Main Vail I-70 interchange rottndabourts were the first rrtadern roundabouts constructed in
the state of Colorado. 'ihe South Frantage Roaci rotuatfabout is the largest in the state at a 200-
foot outside diameter. `lhe Nortl~ Frontage Road roundabout is the smai~~ in the Vail Valley at
~ 120-foat diamGter. Colmts taken at the Narth Frantage Raad leg mdicate PM peak haur volumes
of 220 entering vehicles and 750 exiting vehicles of which 35 came from the I-70 westborand off
ramp. T1ie North roundabdut fimctions effectively as a single circulating lane, atthaugh vehicles
cau physically travel two abreasE araund the circulatir?g Iane. .
Eaisting Leve1 of Service
Level of service (L(3S} is a method used for evaluatang roadwaytraffic operatmg conditions. It is
dependent an many factors mcludingtraffic valumes, perceat heavy vehiicies, lane and sbaulder
wictths. The level of service is detrernuned by cgIcuiatmg the delay experiencect by each vehicle.
'I4ais delay is assigned a letter betweem A and F representing the length of delay. At LOS A
mcrtorists will exgerience litt]e or ma delay. At LC3S F inottorists pvill experienr,:e stop and ga
condirions and extensive delay. Delay is used as a measare vf c,om.fart, canvenience and
maneuverability of the driver. Delay for the affecxed intersections was determined using
I Highway Capacrry Software, implementing nnethodology in the Highway CapaciryManual, 1994
" updated 1997, TraMSportcrtion Research Board. The intersection capacity analysis worksheets are
included in Appendix A.
North Frontage ,Road
For a two-lane, 35-45 mph roadway with X 1-foot lanes and 4-facrt shaulders,limited passing
oPPortunities and uuiuterruprted flow the service vcrlumes for each level of service range from 125
vehicles per hour at LOS A ta 1,755 vph at LOS E, as shown in Table 1. The observed
(Decernber 2001) peak hour valume alang Narth Fresntage Road at the prpject access is about 415
vehicles in the 8:30 ta 4;30 AM peak hour and 535 vehicies during the 4:15 to 5:15 PM peak.
AcGOrdrngly, current two-lane roadway operation is L4S C in the AM and PM peaak penods.
~
I Peak Lana cansultants, lnc. rrrurs&y 12Ji3ro1
TDA
Page 5 M':dd1e Creek Traffic Iinpact Sttadj+
1-10 Marn Vai! lnferchange North Rvundabout
According to Lief durs±on, the Town's raundabout op eratians consultant, peak hour volurne •
enUring fihe roundabatrt is 2,233 vehicles. and at this levet the roundabovt is aperating in the LOS
A ranga. '1his indicates there is a c.crosiderable ,_,arpacity resenre available at the narth roundabout,
7abie t
North Frontage Road Level of Service
Middle Creek
Maucimum Service Row Volurne
LOS Vehicles per hour
A 125
B 330
C 610
D 915
E , 1,755
Soucce: TDA Colarado using HCS two-lane highways.
Project Access
Morning and afterna4n tuming mavement counts at the existing Day CarelMa Bell acce5s drive
are shawn in FigurE 3, The highest single movement, 28 vvestbaund rigtrt tums from North
Frontage Road, occurs during the 8:30 ta 9:30 AM peak haur. Duruig the PM the highesC
rnovernent was 15 left tums to eastboLmd North Frontage Road (towatrd the 1-70 interchange)
followed by 14 Ieft turns from tiae eastbonnd ciireetion. Daycare trips appear to be linked
westbound frontage road trips m the AM and the return eastbound trips in the PM. The prevailing ~
#tow of through traffc is eastbaund in the AM and wsstbound in ihhe PM.
~
TDA
Figure 3 . ' .
Residential and Earlji Learning Center Access °
AM (FM) Existing Peak Haur Vaiumes
Mida'le Creek flevelvpmenf
~
NaR7H
No sen~e
Existing DaycarelMa Bell ,
0
k
~E ~
0) oCV,... G4
co
r ~
s (1~~
~
0
222 ~~'an~. -
.
(2(1~}~ age Cf.
~
~a9e 6 TDA? ~
i
Page 7 Middle Creek Traffic ~Ipact Struiy .
PR03ECT TRIP GEIVERATTi3Dd . ~
Project vehicle trip esCimates are basec3 on The Insti=e of.Transp4rtatian Enguieers publication
7'rip Generatidn, 6`hFdition, 1997. Ttus document is a compilation of trigs rates derived from
traffic catuits at simitar uses thraug,bout the coun?try, Most I'TE residezytial trip rates are from
traffic counts at suburban settings witla lrrttle or na access ta public rransit.
Residerrtial Trips
The Middle Creek paro;ect is located along a high service transrt carridnr with goad pedestrian and
bilce linkages to Vail and Liqnshead ViI3ages. A majority of tenants are expected to woric in Var1
establishments where long-term (i.e. "warker") an-site daytime parking supply will he at a
pzemium fnr much of the yeaa. We an#icipate Nliddle Creelc residents will be lzss incliaaed to
travel locally by caz for vcrork and personal business trips than their "I'I`E-apartmern" cournezparts.
Accordingly, we expect daily residzmial vehicie trips will be in the qrder of 20% less than the
ITE derived rate and peak hour vehicle trips wili be one-quartter to one-tlurd less than the TI'E
rate. Urban centers with kigh all day parking costs and gcrad transit access can have transit mode
splits of 25 to 44%o in the coanrnute periads. We believe I1fiddle Creek residents could read.ily
exhibit a callective 30% wa3k/buslbike mode split in the commute periads. With these project-
specific adjustrnents vae estamate at buildout the residential use will generate 753 daily, 52 AM
and 61 FM pealc hour vehicle trigs, see Table 2.
Leamlrrg Center Trips
Tae eariy leaming center vaill have 15 emplayee and short-term spaces. Parents typically park fas
five to 15 minutes for the moming drap off and evening pickup. Using ITE rates for a I)ay Care ~
Center, the center is eacpected to generate about 470 trips per day and about 75 vehicle trips
ciuring each peak hour,
Table 2
Estimated Vehicle Trip Genera#ion
Middle Creek Developmeni Vail, CO
AM Peak PM Peak
Land Llse 5ize T e Dail !n Daat In Out
Day Care' 15 Emplayees 468 41 35 37 41
Apartments2 142 Qweflin s 753 9 43 41 20
Total - 1,221 49 77 78 62
• 127 139
5ouace: Trip GenaraUrorr 6t7 Edition, Institute af Transportation Engir,eers, 1597.
1. Day Care Cerrter, iTE Lard Use 5ffi
2_ Apartment, ITE Land Use 220, adjuisted to 8{}96 of ITE daiiy & 70% of peak twur.
Town Bus Trips
Although not part a£the project ger se, buses entering aud leavung the residentia.l aecess drive are I
added to the project peak haur volumes for operataonal aualysrs purposes. The three bus raut,es
serving the srte operate at 30-minute frequency in each directian producing 12 bus trips (6 in, 6 ~
out) per haur. These t.rips are adderi to projecC access trips ta axrive at total access drive trips.
i'DA •
,Fage 8 Middle Creek Tra,f"frc Impact53trrdy
I
I ~ PRaaECT TTRrn DrsTRuatTzax
Middle Creek residenti~l tri s wiU distribute over the surraimdin F07a S
P g ystem based on trip
arigin tir destination, and ease a.nd:directaess of travel, New residential trips will travei west oa
the frcmlrage raad for food shopping, mail and otber local perstmai business trips. IVIQre distant
. trips autside the 'I'own will be ariented east toward the I-70 irnerchange. Accordingly, we i
distribute 50% of residential trips ta the west azid 50% east of the site. Day care trips, whicJx tend i
to be linked ta other trips, are distributed similar to existing entering and exiting pattems, i
~
I
i
I
i I
~
~ I
~
TdA
Fage 9 Middle Creek ?'ruf}'aclrnpact Study ~
i
~
~
FUrUxE TRArFIe COrmI°rIoNS
~
"Future canditipns were anaiyzed assuming project buildout by 2003. An anziqaI background
growth of 3% was assumed far the vehicle volume alang North Frontage Road nat related to ihe
project. This accommodates moderate coutinuing residentaal develagmant along the North
Frontage Road travelshed. For firture analysis we applied the ITE trip rates to early learning
center. These are somewhat higkier than the observed peak hour day care voiumes and are
assumed to accaunt far added business due to updating the facilrty.
Future Volumes
Figure 4 illustrates peak hour volumes expected at the intersection af Narth Frontage Road and
?vti'iddle. Creek Residential and Leaming Center-accesses. The higiiest turning m.overnent will be
westbound right tums 31 entering the Leamiug Center access in the AM and a sirnilax volume
' emtermg the residentiai driveway an the PM peak lior.tz-. The highest left turn antering volume wfll
be 25 vehicles tuming into the Learning Center drive in the PM geak hour.
Future Level of Service with Project
Tables 3 and 4 depict level of serviee at the two access drives and along twa-iane 1~lvrth Frontage
Road at buildout afthe planned Middle Creek liousing deveSopment an.dtF?e new Leaming Center, respectively. Capacity analysis workslieets are attached as Appendix A, '
I
Resideritial/Ma BeII Access ~
This Stop-sign approach rvill operate in the L4S B range far both tha AM atzd PM periods. This
is a very acceptable level for peak hour operation ai a property access intersection. Left tum.s
from the site will experience short deIays (LOS F3) in the AM and PNI Feac hours. ~
Early Leaming CenferAccess
Simiiar to existing, this appraach will experience short delay (LOS B). Left tums nut of the site
,will have shart delays, (LaS B).
Table 3
PM Peak Haur ExistinglBuildout Level of Service
North Frontage Raad/JUfiddle Creek Project,4ccesses
Mavement t Res;denfial L.earning Ceriter
~ Access ~ Access
Svuthbaund Left A/8 `
Westbound Right -!q ~,IA I
Soures: TDA Colorada, 6rrc_ Using HCS Unsignaiized Analysis. ~
Norfh Frontage Road, Two-larte Roadway
Nortb Frontage Road east of the project is expeeted to carry approximately 460 AM and 610 PM
peak hour vehieie trips. At this volume, twv-lane Nor[h Frontage Road wvill continue to operate af
LOS C during bath peak hours.
~
TDA
Page 10 Mirtd(P Creelc Traffic lmpact S`tudy
~ Table 4 .
North Frontage Road Level of ServECe
Mlddle Creek Developrnent -2-Lane North Frantage Road
Ex9sting Buildout
i4NiJPM AMIPM
VoEu me 4151535 4651610
LOS* C/C CIC
* See Tab1e 1
; .
' I
• ~
i
I
. I
, I
I
~
;
• I
~
'YDA
F igu r'e 4 ~
k .
Residential and Earfy Learning Center Access
AM {PM} Future Peak Hour Volurnes @ Buildout
Mrddle Greek Developmerrt
~
NuR TH
~ No Sca;e
~+7
~
~
U
U
T-
~ M U
Q) Q
O ~
E arl y
~ Leo.r^ning
(23-_._ CE'fltef"
~
242 (2 r~(26~ ~
~
256 ~orth 0n ta
t2o41 ge Rd:
~
Page 11 TOA
Page 12 Middk Creek Traffic I,apad Skrudy
~ RECOMI4LENDED PRQJE(=T RQAD IMPROvMEmS . .
~
_ Several improvemenfis are suggested.atthe Middle Creek projecr access intersections in '
conformance witks the CDOT State Hightivay Access-Cvcle (see Figure 2). T,hese changes reflect
the 35 mph posted speed of North Frontage Road, peak hour volumes partrayed in F'igu-re 4, and
the Categary F-R (frontage road) classificatian of the facility.
Left Tcrm Lanes
At 23 velucles in the PM geaic hour, fihe residential access is projected to be neaT the 25 vehicle
per hour left turn th-reshold €or warranting a left tum skorage laue per the Code. T'his volume
includes 3 westbaund Town buses' As a matter n£ safety, we advise constnzct.ing a left turn
storage ]ane at the residential access. Tiie grojected (for cpera,.tional analysis) left tum velurme af 26 vehicles for the Learning Centez access would 3ust exceed this threshold. Accardingiy, the left
tum Iane vvcridening #"or tlae residential/Ma Bell access shvuld ex:#end ta the new Leaning Ceirter
access. 'Ihe portion between the twa drives can be stripped as a#wu-way left turu lane and thus
serve as a left tum staging lacre for left tums out of the residential access. This center lane will
provide a larger, more cornfartable effective left turn radius far buses turnin$ left out ofthe site.
Right Turn Storage Lanes fileither access msets the 50-vph threshold required to warram right tum lanes. Although a right
tuna lane would aid "Town of Vail busses entering the progerty, widening far the center tum lane
describsd above precludes additional North Frontage Road widening along the propeztq's steeep
frontage,
~ RrghtlLeft Turr1 Accefera#ron Lanes
Right or left t-m acceleration lanes are not neecled per ths Ccade at this project far either access.
The two way left tutn lane suggested above will serve as a short left tra.na staginglacceieratirna laue
for Ieft tuzns leaving the sita.
~
TDA
Page 13 MiddCe Creek ?"raffie Impart Study
SuNDr.AgY oF FmIvGs ~
. A combined total of about 1,220 vehicles per day wall use the two propvsed l4fiddle Creek
residential and new learning center develvpment access drives. Residsnts are intended to be
ernplayed at nearby Towre shops, resiaurants and business establishments. Daily site-generated
traffic is expecked to be about 20°la less than a similar 142-uriit apartment complex in a typical
suburban setting. Similarly, the combinatian of daytime parking cost and availability in Vai1 and
Lionshead Villages, proxirtaity to'4'ail Village and, f=rorrt donr access to three of the Town's free
bus routes suggests 30% less than typical site trip generataon during the AM and PM camitute
periods.
P:ak period opera#ion (ievel of ser,ice) of each access approach will remain in the same short
delay range (LOS as the existing day carelMa Bell access drive. Left turns from North
Frontage Road will experience littie or no delay in most cases. L,eft turn storage lanes are needed
at each access dnve per State Highway Access Code criteria. The new center lane can be striped
as a Two Way Left Turn Lane. As such, the imprvverneni will faeilitate Peft turns (includiug
Tawn buses) out oftke residEntial site, Right tum deceleration or acceleration lanes are not
needed per the Cade, '
The volume ofproject traffic added to North Frvntage Road will not cause a cbange in two-lane
35 to 40 mph highway operation. The road will continue to operate in the LOS C range, with PM
ageration nearing the low end of the of the LG1S .D service range.
Ihe nearby I-70 Main Vail ndrLh zoundabout intecseciion has cacasiderable reserve capacity to
reaciily accommvdate traffic added by this project. ~
~
TDA
Midrtle Creek. Traffic Impad Study
. :
Appendix A
Existing and Bu.ildout (2003)
Level vf Service Worksheets, AM & PM Peak Honrs
~
~ TDA
i
HCIv'I Unsignalized intersection Capacity Anaiysis
2: Norkh Fronta e Rd. & Da Care DV1f 2/1112002 .
~
. . . a. ~ _ .
Mo--vement IV'BT~B.8 ~~L`R
Lane C•onfigurations +T T* *i
Sign Control Free Free . Stap ~
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Valume (uehlh) 9 222 157 - 28 9 17 _
Peak Hour Factor 0,92 0.92 , 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourty flow rate (vehlh) 70 241 171 ._30 , 10 .18 Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft) ,
Walking Speed (ft/s) '
r ercent B;ockage _
Right turn flare (veh) _
Median type None
Median stcarage veh}
vC, conflicting volume 201 . 447 186 _
vC1, stage 1 canf uol
vC2, stage 2 conf vbl . _ r , . . . .
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 _
pO qUeUe free % 99 . 9$ 98
cM capacrty (vehfh) 1371 565 856
,,,-.~.r - • . Oir~~ctian
Volume Tvtal 251 201 10 18 ~
Volume Left 10 0 .10 r 0
Volume Right 0 30 d 18
eSH 1371 1700 565 . ; : $5fi
Volume ta Capacify 0.41 0.12 0-02 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 1 0 1 2 . .
Cantrol Delay {s} 4.4 0.0 11.5 9_3
Lane LOS A B A
Appraach 17elay (s) 0.4 0.0 10.1 .
Approach LOS B
~
Interseetion ~umma _ ° ~~:~z~ - w~; • ~ . - - _ -
Average Delay 0.8 -
intersectiora Capacity Utilization 252% ICU Level of Service A
Baseline Synchro 5 Light Repart ~
Existing AM Peak Hour
tdadensmal-1t51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Anafysis
.2: North Frontage Rd. & Day Care DW 2+11/2002
111~sT~J'JSR B~BR
Lane Confgurations y
Sign ContrQl , Free Free Stop _
Grade 0°fo 0% 0%
Volume (vehlh) ''-14 200 314 6 15 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 4.92 ` 0.92 0.92 4.92 0.92
Hourly fiow rate (vehlh) 15 ; 217 341 . 7 16 B .
Pedestrians
Lane W id#h (ft) t Wafking Speed (ftls)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type - . . . ' Nane
Median storage veFr} •
vC, canflicting volume . 348 _ 592 345
vG1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 canf vfll ; ` . '
_ . . _ , . - . . . . . ;i', f
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s) _
#F (s) 2.2 3.5 3_3
p0 quewe free °!a 99 " 96 99
cM capacity (vehlh) 1219 463 698
-.--~n-
~ Vo6urne Ti ata! 233 348 4~16 9 -
Volume Lefk 95 0 -16 D
Valume Rrght 0 7 0 9
cSH 1211 1700 463 < 698 Volume #o Capacity 0.01 0.20 0.04 4_01
Queue Leng#h (ft) _1 0 3 1 _
Control Delay (s) 0.6 O,q 13.1 902
Lane LOS A B B
P,pproach Delay (s) 0,6 (}.0 12.1
Appraach LOS B
Average Delay 0.7.
Intersectian Capacity UtiCizatian 28.4% ICU Level of Senrice A
.
~
Baseline Synchro 5 Light Report
Existing PM Peak Hour
tdadensm21-1t51
HCM Unsignafized lntersectian Capacity Analysis
' 1: North Frontage Rd. & Apartment DW 2/1112002 •
~ ~ \0. 0
Movement.~,.NW~"~$.._ S 3 F3 R~•. :6-: _ _ =0~Y
Lane Confgurafions Ta
Sign Contral Free Free ~ Stop _ . , . , .
GTade a% o% o%
Volume (vehlh) 7 242 170.=8 : . 24 25 . .
Peak Hour Factar 0.92 0.92 ` 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 .
Houriy flow rate (vehlh) 8 263 1851, 9 26 27 .
Pedestrians .
Lane 1Nidth (ft) , . .
VV'alking Speed (ftls) . ,
Percent Alockage : . _ . - . .
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh) , .
vC, conflicting volume ` 193 , : . . . -:467 . 189 .
vC1, stage '1 conf voi .
• ; :
. .
vC2, stage 2 conf vai - ` _ ; , . . . . . ' _ . . .
tC, single (s) 4.4 6.6 6_3
, : _ ; . - .
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2_5 3.6 3_4 _
p0 queue free % ` 99 _ '95 97 . . . ,
cM capacity (vehlh) 1214 526 828
- --ec--t~-_
D`rr
Volume 3otaf 271 193 26 27 ~
Volume Left 8 Q 26 0
Volume Right 0 9 0 27
cSH 1214 1700 526 828
Volume,to Capacity Q.01 0.11 0.05 0.03 .
Queue Length (ft) a 0 4 :3 Control Delay (s) 0.3 0.0 12.2 9.5
Lane LOS A g. A
Approaeh Delay (s) 0.3 0.0 10.8
Approaeh LOS B
Intersectian=5urr~rna
Average Delay 1.3
Intersec#ian Capacity Utilization 25.9% 1CU Level of Servace A
Synchro 5 Light Repnrt ~
Buildout
g gaidgya 2603 AM Peak Hour Zotal Traffic
tdadensmal-It51
HGM Unsignaiized Intersection Capacifiy Analysis
° C: North Frontage Rd. & Day Gare DW 2/11/2002
ent ; FBffn : B- T~1NrsT~r ~WBR3~ _~:S~L~SBR
. Movem M z
IFE
Lane ConfigUrations , ~ _ ~
Sign Control Free Free 5tap
Grade D% 4%s 0%
Volume (vehlh) 40 : 265 156 , 31 - 12 22 . . ,
Peak Haur FactQr 0.92 0_92' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flaw rate (wehfh) 11. 288 17034. 13. 24 .
Pedes#rians ~
; : - . . . ' ,
Lane Width (ft)
Vtfalking 5peed (ft1s)
P2fCent $lOCk3g° . . . . .
Right tum flare {veh}
,
Median type , . ' . Nane . : . `
Median storage veh} ;
vC, conflicting volume 203 : 496 186 ;
vC1, stage 1 conf val ,
, .
vC2, stage 2 cortf val . . , . , "
tC, siragle (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 . . .
tC, 2 stage (s) . - . : -
tF (s) 22 3.5 3.3 ~
p0 queue free % 99 _ 98 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 1368 529 856
Diree~ion".~Lane#, W ~.~_V 8~B- g~.
~ Volume Total 299 203 93 24
Valume Left 19 0 93 0:
Volume Right 0 34 0 24 .
cSN 136$ 1700 529 ` 856 `
Valume to Capacity 0.01 0_12 0.02 0.03
Queue Length (ft) 1 0 Z 2 Cantroi Delay (s) 0.3 4.4 12.0 9.3
Lane LOS A B A.
Approach Delay (s) 0.3 €].Q 10.3
Approach LaS B Intersec#ian'~;Surr~.r,na
Average Delay _ 0.9
lntersection Capacity Utilization 28.5% ICU Level of Serwice A
~
Build4ut Synchro 5 Light Report
gBaldgya 2003 AM Peak Hour Total Traffic
#dadensmal-I61
HCM Unsigna1ized Intersection Capicity Ana(ysas - 1: North Frontage Rd. &Apartment D1N , 2111I2002
.
~
Mov B~BR°~~;;
, _ _ _ . .A
NIN
L.ane Canfigurations 4T T,
Sign ControV - Free Free 5tap .
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Walume (vehlh) `23 217. 350 ; 24 13 - 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 ' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 _
Hourly flow rate (vehJh) 25 236 380 26 14 14 -
Pedestrians
, .
Lane Width (ft)
_ Wa[king Speed (ftls)
_
Pereent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh) Median type None
Median sforage veh)
vC, contEicting valume . . 407 679 393
uC"i, stage. i conf vol
vC2, stage 2 cflnf vvl
tG, singie (s) 4.3 6.6 6.4
tC, 2 stage (s) . , . _ .
tF (s) 2.3 3.7 3.5
pO queue free %o 98 98 ' 9$
cM capacity (vehlh) 1081 375 608
s.~j~~5~~.:
Volume Tataf 261 ~ 407 14 14 ~
Wvlurne teft : 25 0 14 4
Volume Right 0 26 4 14
cSH 1081 1700 375 608
Volum$ to Capacity 0.02 0.24 4.04 0.02
Queue Length (i#) 2 0 3 2
Contral Delay (s) 1.0 0.0 15.0 11.1
Lane LOS A B B -
Appraach Deiay (s) 1.0 0.0 13.0
.
Approach LOS B
lntersection
Average Delay 0.9
Interseetan Capaciiy Utilization 31.6% ICU Level of Service A
Bufldout 5ynchro 5 Light Report ~
8 BaIdgya 2003 PM Peak Hour Total Traftic
tdadensmal-]t51
HCM Unsignalized Intersec#ion Capacity Analysis -
• 2: North Frontage Rd. &?ay Care DW 211112002
,
;
.Mo~eme~t ~.U..x ~SBR-~~ ~_M.
Lane Canfiguratiflns <T T.
Sign Control Free Free Stap . GCade 0% 0°/a Q"/o
Volume (vehlh) . , . 26 " 204 362 ' 11 27 '14 ° . : . - . -
Peak Haur Factor _ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 C}.92 ~ .
Hourly flow rate (vehlh) 28 222 393 12 29 15 . . .
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft) . ; - -
Walking Speec! (ftIs) -
PefC°f1L BlOCkagB . .
Right #urn flare (veh)
Median type . Nane
Nledian storage veh)
vC, conf3icting vafume 405 , . , 678 399
vC1, stage,l confivol . . .
vC2, stage 2 canf vol # , . . _ . . . 3::. .
tC, sEngle (s) 4,1 6.4 6.2
tG, 2 stage (s) . . . . . , .
tF (s) 2.2_ . . 3.5 3.3
.
.
p0 queue free % : 9$ 93 . 9$ _ .
cM capacity (vehlh) 1153 408 650
_ . ~ . . .
09rection;•~.-~ne = . ,w...~.~ • ~,.t,~ . : _ ` , - ~ Volume Total 250 405 29 95 _
Volurne Left 28 . Q 29 - 0
VQlume Right 0' 12 0 15 _
cSH 1 153 ";1700 - 408 . 650 Voiume to Capacity 0.02 0.24 0.07 0.02
Queue Length (ft) 2 0. 6 2 , . ~
Control Delay (s) 4.1 0.0 14.5 10.7 j
Lane LQS A B B .
Appraach Delay (s) 1.1 0.0 13.2
Appraach LOS B~
Intersection-Surri,m~ . . , . ~ . _ •
Average Delay 12
Intersectiorr CapaGity Utilization 321% ICU Level of Service A
~
Buildout Synchro 5 Light Report
B Baldgya 2403 PM Peak Hour Total TrafFc
tdadensmal-I1:51
~
~
_ PEAx LAvD suRvErrrvG, I?ve.
PEAK L,AN0 CONSULTANTS, ll'11C. PEAK CIV9L EIVGIfVEERfNC], trvc.
970-476-8644 • FAX 470-476-851 b• I ROQ LJQN'S RIDGE LppP • VAIi. CQ 8] 657
970-726-3232 •FAX 970-726-4343 • 78436 ll5 HWY 40, P.Q. SG1X 1680 ¦ W'tAITER PARK, CO 80482
February 8; 2002
Al]ison Oehs
ToV Department af Carnmunity Ueveiopznent
75 Sauth FrontaQe Road
vasl, cO 81657
Re; Middle Creek Villade Preliminary Drainage Report Addendum
Dear A1lison:
The 1=relirninczry Draznage Report for Middle Creek Village, r3ated rZugust 27, 2001, proposed a
sedirnentation pand at the sautheast comer of ihe proposed develapment. Due to design changes and ~
recornmendations, site constraints will rnake a pond impractical for the proposed developrnent. In 31eu of
a sec3imentation pond, several measures will be taken to prornote starmvvater runoff waCer qualit"",
A curb and gutter and storm sewer system is proposed to carry stormwater througll the sice. The dramaae
system is designed with curb inlets and sand oil separators. Per Town of Varl standards, the proposed
Type 13C curb inlets are designed with a 1.5' sump belaw the inlet to cagture sedirnent fi-am runoff.
Additionally, two sand/oit separators are praposed to capture sediment and oil fram parking lat, acccss
drive, and snow melt runnff. A preliminary layout of these measures is shown on the grading and
drainage plan. A f;nal sizing of the drainage imprQVements wil] occur in the Final Drainage Stuciy for
Middle Creek Village, during the final plat submittal. All impravements will be designed per ToN;-n of
Vail Standards. The proposed system will facilitate sedimentation from site runoff,
Additionally, "Best Management Practices" wil] be implemented during the construction process to
ensure appropriate ernsion control arid water quality measures are taken. Erasion conirol throughout the
construciion process wil] consist of silt ience, straw bales, and cheek dams.
Please d4 not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Mark B. Tarrall ~
Peak Civi] Engineerizag, Inc.
11PE~',lClprojectslTEMPORARYldrainage addendum.doc Attachment: J
Middle Creek ViIlage
Parking Management Plan
The Middle Creek developrt3ent rovides all of the arkin s aces that are re uired b Town
iCode for a total of 24$ s aces. O#'xhese, approximately $S% are cavered, and 70 slots (140
spaces) are in a tandem configuration.
There are a tatal af 69 units that are either 2-bedrraonns or 3-bedrooms. Each of these will be
assigned to a tandem slot. That leaves oniy additional tandem slot, which wzll be assigned to one
of the studio or T-bedroom units. This can be easily accamrnadateci since each of the studio and
1 bedroom units has 1.5 spaces provided for it.
Aliocation and Assignment of Parking Spaces
It is anticipated that each unit will have available to it a parking space(s) within the parking
structure. There are 212 covered spaces, which will be allocated as follows:
~
Number COVERED Total
Unit 'I' e of Units Per Unit Allocation Covered S aces
2 Bedraom Units 24 1 covered tandem 4$
3 Bedroam Units 45 1 covered tandem 90
Studio Units 44 1 covered single 44
1 Bedropm L3nitS 28 1 covered single 28
1 Bedroorn IJnits 1 1 covered single 2
Tatal 142 212
Surface spaces will be available far visitars, or for secand cars for the studio and 1 bedroom
units. All tenant cars will be registered with the leasing office and will have some sort e?f
identification on the car itsel#' (hang tag or sticker),
~
Attachment: K
f
yy'~ f~-~ n s.' A~- ...t ~ s f~ r ~ ~-isq 11-1 ~~,y 'z4s~~.' ~ ~ r s ~"°}!3, , `u. ~ ~ 4_ u 7 X,{ .
~ k ~ ~ ~ 'a~ . - ""^t v { s.i ~ 1.t ti ; F ^.'i > e...; ~ f rr S ~ i,~ . u ~,x- . ~.-`r wr~ ~ 5 " t r~. ~ ~
""rY ~ r r `S
. _ ~'a
~"C f 4 -
,
,
.i..~ a t t9 ~y ? " "y 1 " - -f ~ i: s g t s «t '~i.;, tl - i . . f _ t ac: yt _ ~ ' ( _ 11, ~1 ; } , ~ v L a ,.F ~"r.`til F ~
,
-;i; Y "N.~ ,~--t. Q { 1 . ~ ~a A sX"-% r %1. I. o " ~ L ~£t X"n , ~ . ~ ~ . .
;
;~T ~~7 .}y., a 't / ~.`,r!~' ~j~'.~'/Y
~i . . . . • - I
~ ,
~
y:..~ v: ..,~n YN~P y.-, .r -4~ J t 'ti;~.'.€~
r,~, ~ x ~ ` ,
i~; r^ ! > ~ J.
~k "
,
.d Y . ~ ~ " 1:-' r . y, t
:
~ '-r ' r ' if-.° ~ ' t ~ _ '
;r t: - qr 1. ~ ; r._ ~1 _
.s . . , . t : ~ . w. ,f. } - ~__G. ,
`S - s _ ~ i ~ r h; - _ ~ r' "
~ Vw t ,i.. ~ y / -
r a x- ~ t',: r 3~ i /
$ { ~ "
~ - ~ ~ 3 s,;~tl l 5 1 ~ ~ r G ~ ! f"x'~. ~'4
~~i ~l^ _ a .'t~4,++Y . _ _ r .S . j y ' ` ~ i~.~ -
~ rr y A ~ ~ ~ lk:.. -yy ~l ad Q~ vm ry, ( O : • a'° ~ S.-y $ . ~ ~ _ y v
v ~i - t ~ z, ~l ~~~.`r t~r ~1 ^ ; ~ j
1 S 4 l`~ - 1. f r ^f ~ a~3 'A . ~J D , n r~y , 1 x2 P r
N " I
~ r, "1
~V~.tf r .~~L~': ~~~L~~~~~~~~C~~} ~R~.~~' ~ ~
~s .
: ~ , . <
a. ~ . . 13s' r.i~ t } "
~ ~.b -sc . M~ 9-t ~-;rffs. ? .X. ~ ~,33
,R~ ~ ' . ~ ~ tr~~y.,, ~ I
F ~JI ~Y , Y
Tfi ~ ~ r ~ ~ , i.y\~~ A~r^ S~ 1.,!~~~~~,!- A ~•A "Th
A ~ VR > _
~ . i ~ l}
{ K $ s ~r~S ~ta F! ~ ~
. n ' ~ _ .
. a ~'~-+.~'J+~ \ L~~ T~1?~ ll~~~ ~~f^' 4 ~ . { 4 .f 4 M ~.~e ,
. ' . ~ . _ ~y,.
~1i~ ' f _ . 1.,~ . r~,1 : -,f f y
S ~i .;~r I /
z, ~ ri.~ = 4 +s,~ y : rct~ r ,r ,r ~ y'.
~
h .,t r ~g~ ~ # f 5" l ~ t~' ~ ,f ~:dt x - I
I . ~~'A~` ; m ; ~.7 ~l'o i rc 'r' r~^ T~.. - y. I ~
~ Y~~' 4 ~°'t' :
}
x ~ ',°~r~.~._'r"'S `.~a ra L ~ .S.]l`r~t~i~ ~ k ,
b:- „a...~...b Z~'~.~~~~ .f.w:, x_•: i"-e
I ....r ~ , . , _ I . -
.x- r, ~ x ,7. x.~.n-~--" ~-r, t "'Si... . ~„IS^~y~ y~-rr-' c' ~3 s- ~ ~--~~~+~n- ~tcf [-r r^.~
f . ry ~
ITv: - -+fp a ~'-y.: ~Cz +rr „j i 7 - . ~ a .
.7
~'W. 1, ~.3a~ a~~~."+7c'Li^~l~+r~.- a,~.-~b~> wr.-... _~?.:.~9+`sX~ '4tt~..:~;.'.^v. °•Y.rJ -r~:~ `.t«i"M~...a.,..,~,JLx v^r.r.e`+-Yti~..~..,..f_ ,....i;~.
x''~. ~ i a u.x y ' - ~ F-.. ~ ` ~ ~ y.: ~ ~ ~ r : v o ~ z
. _ . . .
rt: n ~~a e ~ , ~.:y t ~ . ~ i"j rd -~.:iF,, ~.r r _
< .y-, _ f ~d t i c y ' _ ~ z y . t e
= K u ~b N M- ~`'-y w.~ L x~ "'i ' c~r-~
11- +r i~t : _ ~ ~ 4. r - . f > c _
„
~ v:~ k. -~~~k ~y 3 - v- -"j4t"k , ~ ~_<2~.'> ~ ~.,~:~r r ,~.t - 2 ~ l
~ _
}
. ~ 3 . §
. ~
f-•., , 8~~~,.~~.F 7 G_~. F~ ~Y ,~y J Y^µ r= t~P .~.'~~1 ~,f ,r¢. ...~J~ a..~
.1 T ~ . i Ztt -yl - ` ~ ~ ~
-00 a ~ y i f ~ ~f df. r177,r''~~ _
w .1 . t:; Ml ~"~ki~ y 1` r prd.`y k, ~ 4 '
.'a*i ^I ~ .'~~~_-5., J~ -:.pyrf } k4 ~R -n f L" ~ t
.
_ t -;,~y;~ ti; ~ ~ y..
~ '~~R;' i~f~S-I' "a
:
Y. J~s. -t ~ r ~ t, r
_
~ - - F ~ 'i '+r~ . .^'v R . , 'R! f
~ot ~ Cf 1P ~ ~ ti_ 1 . --~4 ~ r s z ~ ~ ~ .
r' i' A ~ ,s p ~ - s r ~ ~
x.
, ,~1 V,~ r _ 3 w a m r~., `
q 1 a r a'd r r. € 3 ~ . ti-
:c JI,ABT L.~~ ~ A 5~'
, wono, y. - `C M ~
w?\A•1 ' t ? L.. r f Y,-,~ 2'
_ - _ ~ -.FS' _ Fr, x , ~ J ."4. :'i~; 1 i X s.
J ; d ,r-~ h H ~ .r . > L , ;
, ~ r ~'r: x :
`~?~i . k A a - . t { mn,,
. a. 1i
t , ' ~ ':.af,e£~ p F~ ~a r-,. L ~~i~
k, t } ~t raL° ti~ i j` -i~''~'.- ~7 f . r ~ y.?.. •
~,r A "re y '.~5 9 4 7 . ~
.i.ti-~'. t
' F . i ' a , > a :
g ~ { v~ . S a k r ~ i 3. ~ s. -sr- `'z ) ' i. 3 ~s . ~'x~..
.
a 4£ r2 tt4 ~ K T: f y t d t~, r' C ,S "y; T } ~
k ~ 9 ,S`. ~Y Y j~a YT ~ L t`5r
0 .k ~ ~ ~ ~ - } . . . .
1, i lr . d , _ k i y.' ~ { ,
" 1... r ~}...y t~. r : Q ~"a ~
~
, t {
. ,x= $ w~ ~1 ;~__s
t p
1 ,
L t, k ~i ~4..s ~ M k~ry1;'~ t 43 .
-x } Y4
t~ ~
-
1:"~~...a:,t.:.:r....~. k"="'" . _ ..t~~ .__•.:P _c1t. i r. . _ ~ c~- ,f ~F~..,.G.~..:i.io.a .i
..C~..'M. ~ ~ ~'.13. F
~ t r -~C '7e' 'Y ~ """'r 5'~ln,r" r +T r'^ e[', ~
'"Fa~~ X . ,t~ r r ] fi . r ~`~i'1 ~~1`'~~IS' : r t~ zY ~ ~'~2 ~
A' ,,q 1 ~ ~ , ~ x, r+ } ~ i : { a r ~
~e y,a r 3- ~r , ri 5~, a ~ ~ i ~ z V
d 00 '~'-A ~ -
r ' ~ t Y AE' k ~ , ~ . R 'r { r~r l i w t i r "'L ~ t 4 .2' a f d ..F A hg
zm"
1 ~c } " a t j ~sY~ ar' ~ - ~ ~ J ~ "1 y~.. S 4 G~` 3 ` Y ~ ~ ~ k ~.?'y~, v , ~ ~ ~ .s 3 a r 2..; .
"Ij p + ~n P, Y t , W } ~r~5 .r~-^~~, ~14-a - ~ , ~ Se 7 ~ } - q , ,,yy, r - , e,- - * , S ' ~
,
{ . , { ` ` f ~~.q ~?x _.+~'F. a i'-. . M~r `"~~`p`~,~~,~ r ~ ,r ~C ~ , f ~ ! , ~ . ~ Y ~ r{ .
'r w ~;F ~X'. ~ k a x- z ~..y ~ . , ~ti~ "~~ry~ ~6'~ t ,4s ~ 1 i ~ Q ; s 's F ' -e c y ~
: t L ~ 4 . r,. ~ Y .r'~ ..t ~ "a" i5~- F
-Ci,., t
s ¢5 j.:_¢ w ~ Y i=;~f s~-+.~-~ l -i,.'n " ~-611 ~ ~ . ` ~.s1'Ky ~.y~.ri ~..t , X ,E ~ 3~L~,~~ °".,.~''~y & ~~r,l
' .
"t -t . Hy~ r . 'K v y ~ S ~ _ 'C, . iy j ~ ~ A. ~Y.+ { y . ~ ,w ~1 r~ ` ~ t . y t 1
,ix`5 ~ T4 y - ~ x .-r c'b x~ } F r.~ ? .ysY ~ ~`r:: y.,~.A t ~ T F £ >r..~ ~
' I1''~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ a. $ r n a r * .:L ~ ~ r t' ~ 17 4 t z' r ~ A s ~~~,+h J ~ ~ ~ l k~-1,~.
y 7 ^ a a : °t" t~,.pi~ g .d.: s'~-i?-:~ ~ ~ > > S . ~ i S 4 '~'3 . S
"a 1 r. ' a - ~.,'r ~'e :.,V ~ 6 f ~ e
~ . ~ s ( 1~ ' ~ z - ~ u 11. r ~ ~
et-r-~. t ~ +x ..L ` ~ s ~y ..~a~. ~ r ~ ~SJB~ L\, ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s.ac`' s ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
~ y''i A ~ 3 r , ~ w i ~ ~ ~ Nyrn x r s~- _ 4 ti ~ r ~3= r"i .e E ; y~ ~ ~ F
s '4~ y Sv ~.~p , a^ t ~ 1 ~t ~ ~f ,rt s 4 y v t-f ; o ~ ~ x ~ ~ y ~ t-, 7 ,
y : y ,c~ ;.v ~,R : ~r~_ k -z.~ t , ° - - .r ~ _ ~ ~ s ° ~ 10 . i 4 ~r ` ~ a~ 'KV ~ n t a ~
5
r ~ X:x `,~-.r` Y r ~ 3~ h ~t x` ~ '~f "Y- e ~ 3 ~ ~ L 4 ~"a
f
11 i y ~•'I ~i ' .~.y~C•- 4 1~~..4t Y -'9 ` ~ i - w
'
g 1a 2 ~ z ~,.~f^ t'~~' Y ` ~1 3 Sy s- t, ~ W 1 r ~,a _ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~r y , z
'
k ~ 6 .s r ~ t. v -~`r°- . x.~ w ,o. .1~, ac.x r R j„{ $ . ,j S,. . ;~r a ~ a ~ ro a ar ~ 'u 1 t ~ °,a'
y ~a 1 ~Y r' w W ~S -a~- ~ e ~ { ,y~.~ i~ .1;, Z. ~k ~e. _ } ''~-~,V'k ,~p.._ -r~ Y ~a.~•
,C"T6.'~1LLTE'~ gt" t'~'r" _ ` 1 ~ "+r ~ c : i
x z' -F .-s. r~.. ~ r ~ ' > Q "
7 { . s~ , ,~d' s ~°''y `
a ~,y c^i` S s-~. *v ~.'4~2 5 y3"~ r i ^~t Y4, ]j ~:``y{+ ~ ~ j y3 3F~' r f i a 'T-- ~Y ~ ~ as ~wi - 'w r ~
, ~,.T i -C'..H ~ ¢ F r ~ y, \'`1k tL 0t1 yf fF~%9'a...~Y,~ ~ dS . . i { 6 x "Y 1 ~
~ : -w*ro a.. J ~ ~ ; " a's", 1, ~i 'i dY ~ Y ~ -l~- z ~`Sy? ~ .~y~
- ; a ~ ~ 1 P` A
r > > _ ~ 5 # ' y ~ . s F ~ ~ , .z _ .r ' ~5.~ : ~ ~
r 3 k t 1 ''}~'z 'r.' 7.W 5 `«..t` : ;f.~ ' - 1 l 4 t,. ~ ~3 a : ~ ~i -s sF
d ~ 7'(. ..l r } y M ..a .a - t ~p -i,:y~. r ,t~ :r' {
~ .~s a ~ h ~ .rts Yf' _ ~.,n,_. . s- ~3 . . Y
.x Vrti °'F~T'~ ~ t i ~ ~ ~:t~'i~~:~~ ~ " r ~ ~ a
+.n's ° 1 1-i. e` ^ q- ~l y~ ; i k f . ry4 ,r y' {i ~~r`~k i ~y~. d x y . ~ `a; -b- 1. zz, _
1.: 1X t r ^r~~~4 ~ ~9~.k~~~~~~ it J..la t~r~4i:'a.Ol'b A-L~ •'~!-V ~~~~~~_~r'~YS. u f p ~T.it °ti ~,T'.
11
0!-` N'.e~ ~ 'i ~l-ryi- j Iy, rI 5*ij„~~fy(.. I:[ ~~F~,l~i-s BO'K k~4t,~~„'v A J X3~(~ F~a a r'e E ,F
Y _ y XY
,.:-t } L 'S '/yT:.; ~~`i y . { 3 ~y , , 3 r 'j:' S..y.~ F 7 ~F;r .,-E: '
Y i.{y. J A ~ ~ ~ ~ .~"l•K•`~ p ~i ~f. ~ ~r~~~~11~~~4~~i l 0`81 ~jF - G ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ - .y~*
f f ~ .A° ~'^~.~.rA ~ ~ ~w j.{f-~ ~I~ A. } x ~ l"1 _ 1L. ~j~~} ~ °ry r-p r 4~ ~ +d, ~ q .
~ 4 ' ,y~ 1 ; . . t I~ ? i~ 4~~ ~9~4+'. ' G . + :Y 4.
Y
~r ~ g~ f a t, t' 'k F r' . ~L : f r r R .
~ , ,.,k t I _ ,1+. _ i. 4
~ ' b } 'S ~ >7 C g kt r s: i 7 ~ ~ ~
p 5~ti t . i I ~ s ~ s
} u r _ ~ - e~' ~ r ~ S y -L,.
- . ~tl
. 'S ~
. ~ F L , a 2'~ '-,;.1.,.~~ e ~ ~Qf
" i.' ~""i l
} s ach
~ , w ~ $ . ~ ~ ment: L F
s' j ~ jhs r f . ' ' `f' ,
t y -
w"s v Y * n s
,aZ`r ' ~o-~ AV, ~ a ~ _ a ' " s~ s ' m_",~'.W~, -j~~ • ~ ~ ~
3.y F t Y.*--1 .
- ' 1.1 ' x'.~ry'M1~~'+e~X~~
. . . . t. -
_ _ «
, .~L4' :3w7.,1~5 ~..C}7Ml b (.~T.Sff`»°„"r._"rn:.. -
- . _ _ " i~"._" '.k.m_ . . . .
wETLAND DELrNEa,-noN R-EPORr . : . . . .
ikiOUNTAIN BELL"SITE
, VA1L, COLORADO . . .
. . .
TABLE OF CC)NTENTS
SECTl N PAC'=E NL,CN4B
l. UN-1: OD LICTI ON ........................Y................................................. i
11. VICINITY .ANI7 GL-:NER.AL S1TE L7ESCR.I13TItJN ........._.1
IIi. WETLAND DESCRIPTION
A. HYI7R..OLOGY 2
B. SOILS........ . ,..2
C. VECETATION N . 4.............. 2
IV. METHODS USEI3..... . w..................... ......3
46 V. R-ESOL[R.CES _ 3
AI'PENDICES.
FiGr r
FIGLIRE 1- SITE 'vlCliti IIY, WT-ST VAIL, COLOR.A[QO, LlSGGS 7.5MINllTE Ql.lAD
FIGURL- 2 - 0%,'ERAI_I, SITE PL,,k\,'
FIGLIRE 3- WETLANDS ,qDJ.A.CENT YO c-OUTH EN~ NNU17L7LE CREF-K
FIGLIRE 4- WETL,aNDS ADJACC14T T+J NOR.YH END ?vtIDDLL CRE£K
PHaTocsPLnerls
DATA FORMS
~
i
.
/
V '4~~~~~' ~ t ir~li'°~ ! ~ ~ ~'~J~~ ~f d~~~ I'I ~ rt~~ J•M, ~ ,
ti~~ ~i11 i r Ifl f ! ! l l~ ~ r1 i
7
yx 7~ l J I 1~ 1V
ti~<,y~~ ~,1~,~ ~`~~`~_~~11~~~r,l~~ ~ °'~r.k:j~``• ~ A7 ~~~~~~~1 s ~'V~ / t~•w.
}i~ ~ ~ P„ 1 Jjf I Y
41 ,I1 ; L:.; ~ =i,''~~11~, ~ ; ~ ~i ~•'1~ y ry//, !,j?% ,l~ ( ~ ~ I i ; r~''/aC
0 u
n
~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ` ~ j ~ ~ f ~ ir ~ ~ / f ti ~ +
i ~
'~V
Il~^~~~.E~~~~. ~~4r~•'~~ iq~l ~I~, A~~~~~~ ~i{ ~ p~r~~ti~~~I~ ~ s~r
~ I i r ~ c.,,+, ~J f~ ,~.-i.._,... ~ti,--=~~~ i~t 11 ~ tV ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~1 l
ir'~,
' ~ ~ ~ 1 ? .~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~
i ~ j _ t ~ \ _ \ ~ ,
•'l' ' ~ f' ~ ~ ~ 1 r , , ~ I . , ,r_.,~ ~
1H
''t~
Of
F'~ f' ~°y , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~~,,'t ~h'l~ ~ ~
, . ~ \ 1 ~ ' . ~ ~t,'. ~ • ~
4 Z
~ i } i ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ + i I / i ~ j } ~ i . ~i~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ` i~.-~ • ~ f/i~ / ~ ~ ~
Y~~~~~ ~~.J
~ 1 ~t~
\Wo ~
1 t'~ ` ~ ~A ~11 \~1+~'ti ~ \V~1~, `~i , ~~~~:i 1 i+ ~ ` ~ ~
~;1,~~
, • 1 I I) ~ , 1
I~t
ti ~ ~ ~ -_1 . "pT.yl"".~f/~.,, / " ~ ~~a,~ m
I'' , 1 ~ 1 ~ ,t ` ~ `~.A
..yc~'"T
/'~-~~~l~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~a ~ I
fl~...........~~f~~~e4~~1~'~~,
, .-~-~~1 ~ / i~i ~°`•\p,A~ ~
~ti
~
I I ~ ~-r
'r~j ~f i 1` } - ~ I~~f~",ii~ li ~ • ,
} ; v-. ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ . / 1 ~=7~~ ~ i •I ~ !f r~ l~/r ~ i ~ ~ ~ S~ ~ t ~ ^
~`'~j~ ~ ~ i, i ~ ~ {I ~ , r~/ , ~ i ~ ~ ~ i L'-i
}f lL~` . ~ ~ I / ~ -V_ r--~i i11;. ?
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j , • f-~. ,C ~..7
,,'7 ~ o
~ - ~A•.,~ , ~ / .ry~ ~ i~ ~ ` . J o l ~ l ~ ~ % . •
~ T WETL,AND DEI.,INF.A,TION RE"ORT
MOLINTAIN BELL SITF, V:AIL . .
E,4GLE COUN~, COLORAD0 . .
1. mrTFLoDucTtON
. Montane Enviranmental Solutions, Lttl. (Mcantanz} was retained by. OdeII Architects, (Client) xo
- identify jurisdictional wetlands that rnay oceur on the `Mountain Bell Property' adjacent to the
Norrth Frontage Raad in Vail, CC?. The Site is proposed for an affordakale housing communiry.
T1ie detailccl deserzptiun of the properry is the SE 1/4 of Section 6, T'ownship 4 SouEii, Range 80
West, West 106° 22' 44", North 39° 38' 46" (Site). Tt is accessed frc,m the rnain Vail Interchange,
west on the North Frontaage ftoad for approximately 200 yds, then first right on Mountain Be11
Road, signposted for a day eare center.
The delineation was conducted on September 27 and CJctaber 15, 2001 as part of planning efforts
to develop an affordable housing cotnmunity far the Town of VaiL
11. VICINITY AND GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTIC?N
The 6-7 acre properry is situated on south facing slopes overlooking I-70 and the main Town of
~ Vail. Due to its southerly aspect the surrounding slopes are generally dzy with sagebrush and
stands of a,spen. `I1ie properry, known loc.allq as the `Mountain $ell' Site is the existing home of
the US Vilest radio tower (to remain) and a small day eare center (to be incorporated into the new
development).
Native vegeta:tinn in ti-te vicinity is sagebnish on the dry south facirtg slopes, however Midtlle Creek
runs a1Qng the north and wgst pzopemr boundary. The creek, combined with evident seeping from
the steep slopes above has created riparian eottonwoaci forests over mueh of the west end of the
Site. The East ersd of the site is significantly drier with sagebrush and open aspen waocil.ands.
Ifl. WErLAND DEscFUPTIarr
Tfze entire Site was visited and any wetl.ancLs identified, except for the pareel•west of the US west
tower and north of the aecess Road (ic€entified as QWest on FIGURE 2). This area is a moist
riparian cattanwaod forest and may have areas of wetiand. It is not prapqsed for consmuction as
part of this project.
~ Wetiands were found only in che imrnediate vicinity of Middte Creek. In the lower stretches of
Middle Creek, near the frontage raad, up to where the access road swings away frorn the creek,
(FIGURE 3) wetl.ands are very narrow frin,ge riverine, with sfeeply incised banks likely due to the
r.oad buiiding.
~ i4fiddle Creek was nat deEnieated ta the varest of the U5 West buildtng until the north end of the
building where the US West propert}T meets the site of potential boulder retenrion site, nvrth of I
Wetiand l7efineaion - Moa{main BeII Sue, Vaat pA
. th.e tower (FiGURE 4), Wetlands narth Qf the US We.St tawer are narrow fringe in places but have ~
rF o.~,,,..
abetre~ develaped floodplair? with less steeply incised banks that the lower stretches -adjacent to
the roads. There are side channe6; frUm the +creek however they app+ear to be active for insufficient
time ar frequency ta have deveioped-vvedand vegetation.
Sample paint 1 was taken in cottonwood woodlands at the south -west ccamer of rhe site between
Mountain Bell Road and the Frontage Road, Na wetlands were identified.
A. HYDR.OLOGY
T~e A-iarow fringe rikerine wetjand is supportcd -b-y thc Inigh wattr floV4S Oi i.L1C CEeeiC aYltf ltS
alluvial aquifer,
Ivtiddle Creek is a low arder perennial creek originating on the mountain slopes above the
Site. A gaging station is locateci on the stretch adjacent to the Fzontage Road. USGS
. hydrolagical data indicates that Middle Creek peaks in Ju.ne with average daily discharges
of agproximatelp 70cfs. i
B. saILs
There are no sod rnaps available for the Vail axea, Saznpled soils vvere san:dy clay loam with
n}oderat+e chrotn.a. In the upper reaciles of the creek, deep pockets of duff are evident of ~
nch soils associated with the xipar-ian woodlands.
C VEGE,fATTON
The wetland is a mosaie of riparian and wetland species. Narrowleaf cottonwood (Popu2us
dngusti folia) vvaotilands dotninate the west portion of the Site, graciing into drier Aspen
(Populzcs rremxloides) wQods and then finally into open sagebrush (Seriphidium tridentatum),
Wetlands were very narrow fringe adjacent to Vliddle Cteek with a poar herbaceous
understory. Some af this could be attributec3 to the Late seasan delineatian.
WLTLAND YEGETATiC7N i.[PI.,AND VEGETAT70N
Acarlitum rolumbiannurn Ame2uncFuer dlnifolia
Alnus tertuifoha Popacl.us rremulC,ides
Distigea fna~oZr,ccrata Prunus virgrnaann
Hera&uTn lanatum Rosa auoodszi
Mertensia citiata.
PoPclUs angu.stifolia •
Sahx sp
~ Sunda sericea
~
Werland Delineairm -1v{ountain 8eu $ite. Vai[ p.2
~ 1V. MEETHODS i.iiSED,. ,
. The wetland detineation rnethods used were in accordance with"the U.S. Army Coips a£ Eneineers
Wetlands Detineation Manual, January 1987. A routine on-site inspection for 'Areas Equal to or
Less than 5 Acres in Size' was performed.
The data for the samp£ing points included vegetation and hydroiagy i.ndicators. SaiI pit-q a-ere dug
in the different vegetatzve corrununities to a depth of 16- inches. They were used to idenrif}, the
presence af reduced soil eonditions; depth tfl saturated soil, and depth tQ free watez.
~+v'~etlanct #aounnarie5 werc cleterttiined by ttie pcrcentage eover ot hydrophytie plant speeies
(abligate, facultative wet, and facultative), indicators of wetland hydtoEagy, the presen.ce of hydric
soils, and topography.
v. R-F-souR.cEs
i. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (19$7), Wetland Deiineatian Manual.
2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1988), National E.ist of Plant Species that Or.cur in Wttlands
Re i n S.
3. Webez, W.A. (2001) C-glorado Flora.(Ws,ternSEope) 3`d Ed Golorado Associated liniversity
Press.
~
~
Wetland Delineaiam - 2v4numain 8ed Site, Vaid p3
~ t ,/if~l Ir s • . , ~ ti. ~r.
1ji.~~~~r:
~ , r/ ~ fJ ~ ~ ~ ' I ~ t ~'J ~ ~
i
~
~
1~r~~1
` ~ ~ =s~~ ~ ~ ~ ~If ~ ~ ~ ; ;
,
~ . ~
r~~'-- ~ _ ; r . ~ f „¦f s f f r ~
.
\ 1 ~ ~ f! t
~ A1\,\`,\ 1` fr f ~ + i V ~ ~ ~i ~r • g ~ ~I I~~~1! i ~ ~ I( ~ I
~ ,11` ~ r l I"j i •
~,;~y~ •~~'Syl~,~y1~ ~ # ~ ; ~ ~ j, ~~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~
ti~Il, 11 `S~ ~ YI~I~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ / ~ ~ i ~f ~~+f~ i ~f p ~ j ~
ti~ 1 i~i /q ~ ~ • •t. r" 1~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ f ~ ~
~ ~ ~•k 1 / r ~ f l^ ~ ~ ~ F i ~Il~+ ~ 7 . ~ ~ i
, ~ I I t1h~1r4 i _ • ~ ~~r ~ ~~j ~r , # F- 3,/' ~
LX+~...
a . Art`
~
~ ~ r~•~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ' / f-~~rlf ~~1,f , ~
~
~ 1 ~ • I,~ ~ f~ ,
1 ~ ' . . ~ ~ r . . . Yy . • i f .
~ I j ~ s~ . o ~ ~ ~ rr ~ y _ 1 ~ • , ~ f
~ ti ~ ~ ~ I~ ' E . r~~ - ~ ~ l ,
,
~I~ ~ 1~~,1~'t G~~~1~~r I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ f ~ r; ~f ~ f
CO
L r!~, ,~r
'~1 +r ~ ~1 f
'
i~ jt~~~. } ~ ~ ~1 ~~Kaq~ti~. ~ ~ f r'Q-+~Jli ~ ~CG J~t'~
ti J ~ M ~ ~ ' ~ ~1,' ~ , } l ~y''~~r r r ~ I ' ; !i~
C6~
~^i~yF. z
I~ ~ a ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ c ~ l 1 `t', ~ ~1 1 , 1 p l / 1r,~ fi - H?rr! ~ ~ ' ~ Fi+'17R
f Iqt :
, ?~;~,E~~~,~ 4~1ti~1'~ti J~,, ,:A 1o~~
~ f
~ .
4.5" ,
~.`J• ~ y $2A 4
F-~.E v
~ $243.5 ~
~ 82Q3~9 ~
r = 32
J ~ , +
~
ry
NtJ
ELE
~ . ~
~ cs
. ~ `
~ - s AMPLe
r ~ fs Q~ ~52 2
4 ~
1 4
Fy ~j~ = 1 f,
,T
1 ~
F
t. . :
,,....~'~'°~..~.^~'+•-r- lj-~t i r ~ r„ e , N '""A~'~, 1(r~"yr,.~..,... .++r,+y; ;`;•i
s _ _ "'""r.:. "~-~.2' . .
~u~y~_.;11 i_ tiu u Iub.oiu rt.:i.1 i.-.u
00 Y F A
~
_ f
MAr n Lt sQ~
. i
- 82~'r3.4~--
= 8228.6
_ $236.3 S" P
- 8228.7 - ~
/
. 4
. DG 0
PAN
~
p rv~
. . ~
~ CENTERLIKE OF 10"
~ B HOLY CRp ELECTRIC
SSOCIA`~~ EASEMENT
.•r r, : - - . J gOCaYC 642. PAGE 344)
~o-
-
~ ` > ' ~X]ST1fYG .
a: BUILDING ~
1C0 MOUhJTAIN
' r } r BE"LL F2fl
~^1
'..T l~['#4 F S -r s k
~Ll~CIE~,.+I R /~^~pSL//YL
T311'1IMJf QR c
r +.i
r~
A
CM4~~jKrpY~.~-+, :~'r~•. 4 T ~ ~ l.~••~_~
~
~ , a
~C '2~,g
g~
sre ~
- ~'~y~,';'•'~ , y ~Y~~ q~~-Y.~ . ~ C ~ F 48, '~w _ ti~ ~
FiGI.IRE 4 WETL.:-~itiDS .AD},ACE.NT TO \CRTH END NSIDDLE CREF14
"'tiARRCW TO W9DER FFZ1tiGE I'tilt-'ERINE;
~'~~i?~
l
44 f • . r .P;¢. '!rf . d~ ,
~ `ss ° ~
. 4 . . . .
~VOGIRA'H
R.OitiC7
r~EAP,
y4i 4
• t ~i
.
_ q X ~•«`y..
. - , .
~
~ . ' .
s-
y,'s?=r--.s~s'~_ '
Y~ ~ 5 4
_ ..f ~ ; 4,;1 ~L
~~T`}'~s,,, ~~~~.X~•:~
p~ V
~ _ _ 1:• . . _ „ ~
~k~` r~ + ,
. y~~, : v ~ " z~ - - . jl~ ff ~ ' x ~l+,r .
' }
' ' ;a.. a Xl` ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ f ~ s ~y' ~'r ~*"~r'''~ : I
- i,~ 4 fw ~ ' ~ "'~Ja- . ~ k z ?~+~,f ~ ~ p.~ ~4~~3`•
'yr, ~_,r3 t ~ :+~r % ~ '?'X
~ { _ ,.~L
~ ~ x:~ ir ; ~~jk k~;~ ^iY r~
~+C, , t~, ~ sl ".~j ei.:4i^
~ ~ ~ t ar - -p. i~ ~ v ~1 ~ Y r rJ
r
~ ,s~r~r~'':~~~~}il~~~ -~4k~ ~r+ ~ ~ 5, -t {k'l~,f;l~_ ~
~ ~ • ~ r r-r. ~ex ~
. . . . ~ . ~ ~arsVr ~ Tw'~~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ 4 . - ~ 7 ~N •
• ' ~ , , - , -~"y M''?,~4. -~~4~~ ~t~ 4 . °,y ~ ~r~-... .r
C' s4,. J'~~,,,~° • +
~ ~ . 3- i_ + ~ ~7'~ .4.,-„+~ y
~ ~ • ~ ~ - ; r~ ~~sk ~ ~ /i`, ~ ~n. 5
~ . ' ~ . ~ +a`-i.~ '~t' *i~` ~ ~ {..~,.~~V+r~ y,. a u.r
, . . ~ _ ~ - ~
_r~ ' , . . . _
, ~
_ ds--+"'a~ .~r."-~-'~- ~r
. ~i ry r.tio~r'°* r °r.i .Y.. ~1~
- x t -Y.,t• ;`x 1
~ ' : ~ r~~ i~~
!'HC~T~RAP~-~I 3 - ' ';~~~w ~w~'~
,
M;fL77L7~LF C.R~.EK " "`~~~"~',.q.~~~;. ~ .
fL
LiPP~.R ~T~TCI~ ~ ~ . - M~,,~,~
S£1-III~~D '~IS li~~ ~T BLDG ~ ~~j,: ~ ~ . _ s.,i =
MQI~EC~4~~R~R~VI.r~ .~c, ,r _ "•~,•;---~:..-,w~~L~~~~ r-
~[y" ~
. - ,a _T~. ~"'y`,' ~'"1 ~r,~a~W~~~*~~Y" !.;~~f'~' r• -.r~"~'~
~ ~ ~ ~s~' ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~~I.~ ~
r ,~~4 _ 1~T
~ ~`_s[S~~'~ "n~
, -'s ,F 3~.- ~
~ _ . . ~ ~ _ _~r~? _~i.~i
~
- . . . ' . _ ~'-'~~'~'i ~~`.~ya ~ ~`•R -r `.t`.t~ 1~3
•.p. i~L ~ .1 ,r.A ; J ~ A ~J ' 1I
~ } E~ ~ ~•r r ~ ' 1i
~9/.iw~±i1 ~L~ .5? 42~~7~ 'c. ~ _ .
~.ff{~~~ ~ ~ : t
~ ~4 P~r. -Ar.~~ F~~ ~ w1~ t
. .y . B~Y~ ~ ~~h ~v ~i'~+iy y
' ~F a~.e9~..~ ~•~i~( ~ "3.~' ~ ' Y
t ~
~ e ~ . ~ ~~y,~!
~ .
~ ~ ~~Pi~»_~
~ -
" , ~ - ~
r-
, ~ ~
PHOTO~R,~+,PH ~ ~
f~i[':qRIAV b'~'~DL.,~'tiC7 °;j~ ~ rK~~~
w ,~,j,• ~,i
.~Q~.~CEfivT T~ CR..E~K j, ~
VI~'1T~ I SID~ CH:~1~1I~'EL~ ~ y~.~.~
. ` ~ ~
; ~K . _
~ s~'-~, r
ie
~ ' f~ ' ~ ~ I
~ ~ i~l
~ - ~
~ ~ ~ ;
3 ~t: ~ y'1C~~1. ~~AJf•~•,~~ .+i'*~ I' ~
~ ~ ~ ~7'f s .i a ~r y: ~
4 -.y~ [f~~ ,.,~jbf ~ ~ "y ~
~ y ~ ~-~1..~ a f~!~;~ , .r .
~F y,.
-
,~,,ti'^ ' -
f , u,.~~° L.~~'~.'
UATA FORM
RflKMNE W'TLAMD DEt'ER141iNAT'i+QN, - -
11987 G~E Wetlands Del`uioaticre Mastwil • .
~ PraJectfSite~_ ~ . - p~. • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
AppiicantlOwner• (L~~s 0(j e (I ~
Strte:
~
Do Ncrmat ~iresrmsi.ances ax#st tm the stze7 Commur~tY ED:
~ fs the site sign~cantly distu~ed (AtyPicat 5ituaclon)7 Trsr~cx l~:
ls ttie area a Potential Probfem Area7 Yas o PiCrt.ID:
tlt needed, explain cn raverse.1 .
VEGETATinw
r ~c ar min~ ~Te7tt SC~d~t ~~j' L~,- atar ,
Lfamfnont
t. POO tJJU< Qur.NSFi ICn _T.,, „ -
2. ~YV~P~av~c,i.t;t'x G1Aif-n;10' Ct1' 1Q.
C, . r '
f 4. ~ W 11,,~
31
4. L a Sf3 ~ ~Z -
e. 14. - - r._-
_
7 - - -
._,,...,s,.~ ~
~
~ r..C.nt ar Dacrirmm zp•a.s dw oaL FACnr w FAc • .
Wxeludin9 FAC-}.
Il~rtn~ti~s: •
HYDRO E,OCY . .
i3'Catr (Dwaer9se in RunsQ; - WrtSard HYdfohw kisestow • - . ~ ~
d .
9,; itrvanf, Liks. ir Sida Goupe
t J~,~' ~rr . • J ~ ' { . _ ~
~ Aoriri MmwQrapM
visi~ h.Uplw. 112inct~
~t ~Iiti~Kota~~,,~ata ~vilsbl~ ~~Ma~s?Mrka
"`6b 1f1 ~'lAdw+di k
' , • ~ ' Damiey~p~ 1"a~tw'rw
~`AiIE~#rsrva~d~irs: ~en Cz w aiwf r~4uk~'
rfs t?epth.oi' tuti~res ~iYater, px,~rs+ d k! ,~;13 .
,l • 3,
w.s..tsi+++a
T ; ~Dept1+ !a km Wmwt;4r+ ft iefrvw GMsi* ' •
~FAC4*1a1d Too
04Atl5 tm Scura"# Sa: Ef4lm M*sin in Mmadmt .
.:~'jt h
" ,
1~ . . • . ~ , . ~ . ~ n~ . . . . ;!:41
y ~
,F , . ~:di . . . . . _ , s,~'1r~:-.,,,.r
. ~ , .
~
UATA FORN1 , .
. FIOUTINE WET1AND DE1-EAMiNA"I7aN' . . .
(i9B7 C0E Watlands Delinnatirm Mariuaq • ~
f rQ]eC't.rS1te: f 'f vu'r ) AppllcantlC?vvnar: ` rr~'1e Caumy; tAr.,le
a
Investipatoi. _,s, , ^ - - - Sbrtv: .0- - .
0
Do Narmal Circumstances exist ors the sate? ~ Yrs 'hsa ' Canmur~ty IQ:
la the site sianif"ntly disturbed (Atypical Situatian)7 ss~ Tratt~act (Q:
!s the srea s potential Pro4lem Araa7 Yu Na Pbi.ED: '
(lf needed, explain on roxerse.) VEGE"!'AT]QT1 pamtnant ryRrrt Soecies _ ttetun ficstor porrrinrnt Tlsr[i Satd• _ St~ c or .
~ i'..•" f' i y.'1 i t`~: ' J(.: '-l i' ! r r~~-
14.• Y~ ` ,^.i ! rA ~L' f: L~ V S iV. ~w
4. n 1w rd,l`~C~~S~S ,•n jt~k ~I 12.
s.- . . 1s,
7.
PsreNm ot I3wriirwirst Spedes ttKt wn OBt,,. FACW ar F/IC • -
iexcltrdinp FAC•1. Rsmvt~ca:
~ V" Vt} ~cr t~ i-v asc-an- 6`?e4'JbrX.Cocv~
- ~
FiYDROLL7GY ~ . ,
W~S- d GMS 1'D e¦srSrr 1n ~1~rr?~r1~a1: Wrdand HrdreiepY 1~
Stni~. S,ai~e. sr T3d* Csrup+ !'rkrmy 1rod'icatarr, Aeri~,~l PhotaQrr{~Fe Other t+rtrsmed fn lJp{~w~' 1T Mnoto Mcarded Drt,~ ArrrTalalr W~+ur M~r1ca Dr~tt Urw S~M1l r'
FU
oY~+'wr'r'1~ ObrRfYf~Oftf: ~
eRaQ! ~f~1 W!~
tydl:
Wpih ef Surirce Wrtsr. _0n.} t}~d~sd Roet t~nnoM in iJppOi 3Z inaMs
airrrd issMw .
~
D+pth to FtM VYoter 4ra Mr. D~r.! • Lr~ai 6aR Saurrrl? Dow '
FIIC44miryl TOst
Depth to 6sturrtrd Soi: oMNr L€xpWn in Rrmrrks!
Alorrmrics:
~ • .
. ~A~
~~ONAIFT"AL
AcQUSrres o.r+o Vis¢nrioH C4re4uir111s
JUry 12, 2002
I
Otis ()dcll, AIA, ~
Pnncipal
C}dell Archilects
32065 Castle CourL Suite 150
Evergreen, Caiarado 80439
Dear Mr. Odell,
T}zes letter provides an update to the original noise analysis canducted for the Mieidle Creek Affordable
IIausing F'Taaect in Vail, Colorado (Ref.• Letter from Narakard Environmental, Iiic. to Qa'efl Archrtects
dated I12812002). Tlie reason for this update is because the layout of the originaf design ]3as been
changed, thus the noise analysis had to be revisiied. As with the original analysis, the pUT-pose afthis
study wa€s tp enmpare the calculated overall interior noise levels for the propased sti-uctures to the U.S.
I3epartment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) interior noise goal of 45 dB(A) (Ref: The Noise
Cuidebook, US De,partmenL ofHousing and Urbun Developmerrt; 1991)..
The updated analysis shows that the progased Middle Creek Affardable Housing praject will achieve the
IIUD interior noisc gaal of 45 dB(A) using staudard exterior wall cc+nslruciion. It should bc noted that
this analysis was conducted using peak-hour (ioudcst-hour) traffic conditions, which cypically only occur
fcrr a total of about two ar thrce hours per day. The following pravides an explanation as to how the
~ exterior and intcrior noise levels vvere calcuiated, followcd by the resulis and eomparisvn to thc HLD ~
interiar noise goat.
Noise Level Calculation MethodoCogy
5imilar to the original analysis (Ref.• Letter from Hankrrrd Errvironmentcrl, Inc. to QdeII Architects dated
112812002), the exterior noise levels were predic#ed based on measured noise ievels at the site, topob aphy
of the site, peak-hour tra[ric vvlumes and speeds prorided by the Calprado DepaRment of Transpantation,
an€1 an updated design layaut provided by Odell Architects as shown in Figure 1. Noise levGls were
predicted for each structure om the top floor using its nearest locaEian to I-70, which typically corresponds
to the laudest jocation. Frimary factars that affect the nnise lcvels include the distance of the structeare to
I-70, the location of any barriers or berms tliat block the I-70 tzaffic noise, aad the amouot af sound
absorption hy the ground. As with the original analysis, no signi(icant naise barncrs were found beiween
I-70 and the proposed structures, and no ground absorption was applicd co the calculations as the
praposed structures are significantly elevated. Thus, the results of the analysis should gravide a near
worst-ease scenario.
103 East Simpson Strect • Laf'ayektc, C4lorad4 $0026
phoncs (343) 666-0617 o fax (303) 666-1053 • Nvw+w.hankardinc.com
I Attachnnent: M
i
.
ENVIR+DNMENTAI.. ~
1----~-~-----
AC4USiIGS AHE1 VE9RRFION CDNSUCTIN6
r-
o.2o
0 ~
?
z CL 2 U
^
~
W b ~ " = I
O
-j CD m
4c n v j
ra p n 1
~.J
0
j
~
~
r
o ~
°
LX
~
J
~
I~
F'I[;uR,E j:Mu}DLE (;REEI{,+'~FFt)RDABLu HpU51NC'r-NOiSE AitiA.LYS15 Si'fE PLAIti
~
UP17ATED MiddTe Creek AfJ"ordubde Housing Inderior Noise HlJD Comparisun Paoe 2
~ ENVLRC)NMEPtiTTAL
AG9VST1GS ANP VI6PfA7~p% CON5L'4iiN6
Results and Camparison to HUD Noise Guidelines
The resulls provided in Table l show the predicted interiar and exieriar peak-hour noise level for the froat
fagade of each structarc ncarest to 1-70. The standard amount of transrrzission loss for exterior wall
c:nnstruciion of26 dB(A) was used (Ftef. Noise Control far Building rrrrd Manufacturing Plants, I.rrymrm
AV: Mtller, BBN, 1981, Ta6le 6-7). Note that one assumptian made here is that all windows are operable
but closed, and that they caver no mc?re than I 0-2()°l0 of the exterior wall arc;a.
T~BLe 3
C1PI]ATHL7 IC+iTER10R AND EXTT~R[t9R N4ISE LEVCLS F(7R THE M1I)DLr CRGEK AFFC7RD,ASLE Ht3USING
I'rcyposcd Exterior 1'eak-Hour Standard Cx:lerioz' Interiar Pealc-Hour
17escription Wall Construction
Structure Nois~e Level Noise Level
Transmission Loss
( ) t ) (dB(A)) (da(A)) (dB(A))
Building A apartmenGs with 69 26 43
community center
Buiiding B apartments 67 26 41
Building C apartments with semi- 69 26 42
Uaader~;~round parking
~ Hualding D daycare cei?t.er 64 26 38
As shorvn in 7'able 1, the predicted inkerior noise levels are below the 45 dB(A) spec3fied in the HliU
guidelines (Ref; The Noise Guidebook, CI.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developrnent, 1991).
These results were similar to the original analysis, as the lacations of each newly dcsigned structure did
uot mave srgnificantly nearer or further away from I-70 as shown in Figure 1 on the previons page,
As with the onginal analysis, ik was assuffied that standard exterior waH comstruction caaaststs of a 4"
cxtcrior wall with 'f~n thick gypsum wallboard an the inside, '1~" thick plywrod on the outside, and
acoustically absarbent maEenaQ (i.e_ fiberglass) loosely filling the cavity. Standard windows were
assumcd to be double paned with a 0.2" airgap. Additionally, because these mu[ti-family structures bave
cxteriar daars opening direcily tca the vutside, all doors facing I-70 were assumed to be solid coze wood
(or acoustically similar material) that is 2" thick (ar a density of 8 Iblft2 ) and weli gasketed.
Thank you far invajving us with this project. Please call if you have any questions, or we can be of
further assistance_
Sinc erely,
'54
Jeff Cerjan
Senicrr Enginecr
~
UPLrATL'll tLiiddle Creek ,4,/)°'ordahlN Hausing Jnterior Nnise HUD Comparison page 3
!
41L
Tau~v o
Department of Cvmmunity Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-979-2138
FA.Y 970-479-2452
www cr. vail. co. us
July 29, 2042
Public Servace Campany U,S, FOfE:Sx Si'NlGe
Holy Gross Eiectric Eagle Riuer Water and Sanita#ion
U.S. West Vail Recreation District
AT&T Cable Services Eagle Courrty Ambulance
Ta Whom It May Cancern:
According to the Tov+rn of Vail Majar Subdivision Regulations, wherr a request for a majar subdivision is
reeeiued, the fol4owing agencies rnust be notified of the request.
a. Department of F'ublic Warks.
b. Town Fire Department.
c. Town Police Qepartment.
d. Public Service Company of Colorado. ~
e. Fioiy Crass Electric AssocEation.
f. U.S. West.
g. Cablevision eompany serving the area.
h. Natieanal Foresf Service_
i. Eagie River Water and 5anitation District.
j. Vail Recreation District
k. Eagle County Ambulance District.
Qther interested agencies when app{ieable.
Such agencies shall be required to make recommendations and comments withEn ffteen (15) days frpm
the date of receipt of notification that the final plan is availabse for review. Failure to rr?ake
recommendations and/or comments wrfhin the preseribed fifteen (95) day period shall be deemeof
approval of the final plan_ P1ans are aWailabla at the ofFice of Gornrv7unity DeveEapment batween the hours
of8AMto5P'M,
I have attached a map of #he Mountain Bell site, which is the lot to be subdovided. The development pEan
includes approximateiy 142 new housing units. The pro}ect is cQnsidered a major subdivision. The
Planning and Environmental Commsssion hearing on the final plat is scheduled for August 12, 2002, at
2:00 in Council Chambers.
If yau have any concern or comments, please call me at 479-2369. f would be happy to go over any
plans with you.
S6ncerely,
IL a
Ailison Ochs, AICP ~
PEanner ll
i~'`,* RECYf:LEUPAPER Attachment: N
p :Iuawqo2llb
z f d ~ ~
;ga
~ a S~ 6 I g c~g~+~M~k ~ F G` 5. g i
97o x ~u g6.~ i
'4~ I
s
ti
~
r
~
~
a
°g~ I
:
.
. . p
~ - 1 ~ s h¦ 8 ~
N d .31
#
~
if
P
I @
y ~ ~I le`
W I ~ Y S
ifv ' 3 e
^~A~ ~ 6 E c Y~ ~~y ~ F
vl
ti
~
114
a bY,"9f~7i s
LO e
:
1 mng f11-,R a51 4$ je~g%a2a
aj dre~~~"a I ~ ~ a i
ti i~ a~R w~ ~_4 = af€?~~ zdy 9 9a g~ F~g~tm~ ~K~3~N
Q ee ~~efa~
h s~! ~ca~I
$P12%
~iIg Sia ~os• t~ i~~°~~~4 ~I ~ d j I ~1 S
~c
' ~ ~~~~s I~~ °s s s ~ 'y3t gn dY~~~G~ ~ `Sb•' p ~
21d,
E~ f 8 1
~ ~ , y; + • e a ~ y ~ e~ s"`~ ~ tY#5~~• g d¢ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ , '~r .
aN r~~~b
~~a_~
~
Q ; •
u k e~
~. _~
^ A ~ ~
sA
..y
x
V
a
~..'
...
0.,
::
~-.
`"-.
E- ~
~ ~
CS
~,,, O
Cf7 "~
W a
~ ~ [,
yo„~ ~ d
[r
~ ~-~. Cr}
r"„1 ~.
~~ ~w
~~ ~ ~
°w w ~ ~
Ga., ~ ~ ~
~ CJ p
q ~ •a
A ~~
d Q
E"y '~
W
E
Q
yJ
~ ~i
v
c~
~~~ ~
~F ~~~~
~~~ I~~~
~~
~ A i
~
~ ~I
~
tl ~
~~
I
S gy ~ ~
~ ~ ~~
r
~
4`
$ ~ ~
M8DV63D'~~R.~~ (GiC7 (EPY UK~~u17'
y
L ~
-~
~. ~ ~ ~a - q ~r~ ~~~
1y _~..aw .... _ •IP
`~ r
~ ca,~~~~~-
a
I
! 3¢
1 ~~
3caad g
s z ~~ 6E 5 ~ ~! ~
s ~ ,:y~g
~,~ ' ~ I
~
5
_ ~
1
xq
f spa
g~ ~€~ j
~~ ~y
s
a ~'~ I
~z.a~ ~
I
~ I
~..
~ ~
r
~ o I
z°4 ~
r ~ Y~
~ .. g~
~~~ fi
gg,,
~ a~iu ~1
~V
A~ ~ ~
~
R
i k c~ . ~
` ~
'+°~ R ~ 3~4yyp U
K9~p ~
N
o
; ~ ti
6 ~'s eflE
`
.`.~ } # ~
~
~
}
¢ ~;
a
g4~
~~~
.l ~ I, rl ~
~ ~y~ YM~
o •~
g3?
I
Evergreen Lodge
• V A I L
August 12, 2002
Town of Vaif Planning & Environmental Commassian
Department of Development
75 South Frantage Road
Vail, C{) 81657
Dear Gommission & Development Staff:
Having reviewed plans for Middle Creek i wish to voice bath supgsrt and cancez7n abaut
the project.
First, I do Favpr development of rc
asonably rp iced employee housing that is of
resgectable quality, thus encouraging residents to behave with respect for their
surroundings and neighbors. The Mvuntain Be111Middle Creek location seems
appropriate ta this use as it is clase to vvork and hapefully residents would be encouraged ~ to utilize public transportation or waiking to warlc rather than further irnpacting Vail's
Iimited parking.
1VIy cancerns are based upon the anticigated price of rents in the unixs and the size and
balance of the atructures on the site. All our employees are canscious of cents and many
struggle to rnake ends rneet although they wark two ar more jabs. If at all possrble,
keeping rents per bedroom below $650 per rnonth would be importa.nt. Second, the
sketches of the prvpased buildings appear to be impasing and too much far the small site.
Granteti, the Mountain Bell tower and the school are not examples of exceptional
architecture, however, I feet that what is proposed it vut of scale with the natural
landscape. Further, when passing through the roundabout, this will be aprim:ary
intraductiQn #o Vail. An oversize building on ihis site simply is nor appropriate.
As a neighbor across the street (Interstate) and as both a business owner and resident of
Va.il, I urge yau to consider haw the views of the building from the east and from the
south will be ixrapacted. It may be necessary to scale the deveIapment down in order to
mapntain an attractive balance and not overdevelap the site.
SinceFFly, ~
Oamela Stenmark
Gensral Manager
~ Cenera.l Partner
250 South Frontage Raad West • Vail, Coforado 81657
970-478-7810 • FAx 970-476-4504 • www.evergreenvail.com
~
EL,A?INE KEd.TON
1034 HOMESTAKE CIRGLE
VAIL, COL4RADO $1657 ~
970-476-5411 . ' ~
. . I
. ,
DEAR MAYOR KURZ I
PLANNING & ENViRONMENTAL COMMISSION . i
DESlGN REVIEW BQARD YES, WE NEED INTEGRATED LONG TERM AD SEASONAL HOUSING. YES, WE NEED EMPLDYER OVIJNED HQUSlNG.
YES, WE NEED A LOT OF IT.
BUT WE DO NC?T NEEQ ALL OF Ifi IN ONE L+C}CATION, ESPECIALLY ONE V1/HICH IS So
VERY VISIBLE AT THE "FRaNT DOOR TO VAIL".
~ THE ALTERNATIVES ARE AVAILABLE TQ SPREAD THE UNITS NEEI7ED: THE "HUD
WIRTH PARCEL" AND THE TiMBER RIDGE SITES GDUL.Q PERHAPS ABSORB THE
NEEDED UNITS. EACH OF THE ALTERNATE LOCATIONS W4ULD ALSO HAVE
AVAILABLE PLIBLIC TRANSPORTATION.
VIIE hfEED T4 CONSIDER AS THE IROQUOIS CVATIONTHE IMPACT ON TH E WSEUENTH
GENERATION° BUILDING THE LARGEST SlNGLE PROJECT AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE
TOWN - TFiE 1ST THING SEEN AS YC)U EXIT 1-70 AND THE 1AIEVIJ FRQM THE M{)UNTAIN
AS YC3U SKI DOWN AT THE END OF EVERY DAY aOESN'T FEEL SYMPATHETIC TO ALL
WE ESPOUSE AS A WORLD CL,PwSS RESORT.
LASTLY, PLEASE DO NOT FORGET THAT THIS LAND WA5 ORIGINALLY DE5IGNATED
OPEN SPACE AND THE REMOVEABLE OF THIS TRACT WAS DONE TO CREATE A
5MALL POCKET OF 40 EMPLOYER HQUSIMG UNITS.
SINCERELY,
.
ElAINE KE-LTON
~
- ~
~ ARTHUR KELTON JR
225 WALL STREET
VAIL, COLQRADO 81657
. 970-476-7990
T4 MAYC?R LUaY KURZ
THE P.E.C.
THE DESIGN REVIEW BDARD
PLEASE G4UNT ME AMQNG THOSE OPP4SED TU THE OVER
DEVELOPEMENT OF THE "fVIQUNTAIN BELL" SITE NOW LESfGNATED
MIDDLE CREEK. TH[S SITE WAS DNLY REZONEfl TO ALL4W FOR 40
EMPLOYER OWN'EC3 UN17S, NOT THE ENLARGED DESIGN QN THE TABLE
TODAY.
THIS lS THE ENTRANCE TO THE TOWN OF VAIL, THE FIRST IMPRESlON
~ THAT THE VESITaR IMPRINTS. NPLEAESE REC4NSiDER THE DENSITY AT
TFIIS LOCATI0N AND SPREAD lT TO OTHER AVAILABLE SITES SO AS TO
MAINTAIN THE iNTEGRIT'Y OF THE RESORT EXPERIENCE.
ART K 0 ~
8I12 2
~
~ . .
44A
A
~
.
IlLn
. ~
~ r~ ~v----- •
~
-7z-6
Lk.-7Z-
~ . ~
~
, , . ~ T f^ ° a
?
Y
. ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ r ~
~
0
-~4 0 go Ai ~ r
4
je
" pg6
6 r2 ~ .
.~,-b
o
A;~ 6:w~
. • ~ ~ ~~.I, t- ~ ~
~ ~ ? -14S
~ ~-p' C.)
er~'
r4
. { L,~ G r~ ~
~t`~ r , ~ ~r i ~ .f4
rS ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t
~ . _ •
* TQ: VAIL TOWN C4UNCIL AND PLANNfNG CQMMISSIUN
~ FROM: MARKA M4SER -1880MEADOWRIDGE #4, VAIL, 47G-5S22
aE: PRQPOSEQ HQUSING QN 7HE MOUNTAIEV BELL SITE
With a Rotential rer.tal unit-, cor!Zir?g on *.he rnarket in V2?1, 4have
been polling several other a?nrners of rental units as to what is the current
fair market valu.e €or. ayear's iease. in, Vail; Se^veral awnrers, of pro?perty tn-
Vaid have told me tha't they are having to adjust downward the $1,500
rental price far a year's [ease on a two-bedraam, two bath witn a foft unit
they have rented for several years. They will definitely have to fvwer the
price considerably.in order to negotiate a year's lease. And even with a
Iawer-priced proc}Lrct that has beerr reeently renno"ed and ttpdated; they i
doubt they will he abie .to obfiain a year's lease an their property. '
Thxs signais tv me that rentals 2re becoming far more available, so
to add to tlaat market today wvould be a big mistake. I alsa feel that the
product being offered in this buildirig wou-ld b.e rmuch smaller far the.p.r~ice.
beft eharged than rra fry r.rnits aEready tn th+e. rental ma-rket. Thfs cart
hardly be considered "afFordable."
e feet the tQwn should nat be in the rentaf market, except for those
irental units that are specitically for their own employees. Business owners should acquire units for rent ta thelr own employees. Timber Ridge
anc}. Sunbird in Ltonshead are exampfes af what happens vafien there are,
la'Fge numbers of rental units on one small area. It becomes seasonal
employee housing for sin_gle workers. Families don'fi want to have anything '
tv da with ix, because it is nat a nice place live. Check out the rlrug use
and dealing vccurring in these housing areas.
1. have al~so researched that the most sougMt aftef untts of housing.
. are studias or one bedraom units where full-time, year-araund single
empioyees vr a married coupie may live afFordabiy, without roomates.
A far better optian for the town to pursue would be housing such as
that in the Cammons and Elfefson Park where year-araund employees of
VaxE cari, be assistec+ irr pwrchasing th-eir own. hQme.. A home-owner cares '
a6out their praperty;. a renter often daes nat. Please recansider this
development vf a valuable piece af Vail real estate, and do not consider
putting it inta an already overbuift rental pvvl.
I
4
~
{d ~~59L~0L6 a3S47We1~~'dW W02i~ Wt1B~' l l ~-E l-8
~
r
~_i-.'2•.
~
0 ~
?~+~F ~?V ' `~{~J ~ ! ~
~ i
~
,
~
~
~
~
lo Le9
4 6 0-v 16
k~ f b-~~t iol-
U-5t ~ LF, CX V _
Oil , j ~ b Lv f6 a.jr PK~- ,-L Qs-~
C1Frcv~~i-ku, t e,s~. k
6
~ri t V
L
ac46- rs ~ c a-
~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~'~.C,.c~:~ ~ 5 ~-c~c~ C~,y ll ~ ~ ~ ~
1,7
K
.
~
F'age 1 of I
~
Pam Brandme,yer - Fw: N"Iountain Bell Site - Proposed high-density hnusing
From: "DIANA DONOVAN" <dianamdanavarr(a)
,msn.com>
To: "Pam Brandmeyer" <pbrandrneyer(&
.,ci.vail.ca.us>
Date: 8/12/02; 12:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Mountain Bell Site - Proposed high-density housing
Original Message ~
From; Ronald Snow
To; towncouncil@Gi.vail.co.us
5ent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 5:12 PM
Subject: Mauntain Belf Site - Proposed high-density housing
Gentlemen,
We have just learned of the effart to change this dedicated open spaee to high-density developtnent.
We understand that this site was donatcd to the town as a perr-nanent open space and to preserve the
entry to Vail as a mauntain e6mmunity anci nat as a congested urban core. VroIatian of this trust by public Officials should not be considercd under any circumstances and should result in forfeiture of
the prcaperty if this is your intent.
This site is very steep and cannat be developed in any fas]aiofl without cansiderable compromise to its
natural character. Any efforts ta design a"hidden" development project, let alone a high-density use
are impossible and incampatible with this site. The location is nDt remote from neighbors willing to
pz-otect it from irrationaI development but is central ta all ofaur cidily lives eac:h tin-i.e we enter the
~ village and each ti?ne rrre traverse its corridors. This is not the irrspression that our visitors and
reszdents should have of rhe Vail experienee. Qn behalf of all owners and residents, please do not
indulge in planning that is so short sighCed.
The Lianshead improvements and other Village plans have praceeded vaith much more deiiberation
and tlioughtful planning. High-density aciditians on trpen space must be deliberated and planned even
more thoroughly.
Sincerely,
Ron and Mary Snow
401 Scorpio
135W N[eadow Dr.
Ron Snow
Do Yoa Yahoo."?
HotJobs, a Yalioo± scrviee - Search T'housands of T`dew Jobs
~
file:/1C:1WindowslTEMP1GW } 040Q 1.HTM 8/12/02
Page 1 af 1
.
Pam Brandmeyer - Fw: Mountain Bell Aff4rdable Housing Project
~ From: "DIAI'd,h L)ON(JVAN" <dianamdonovan ri~msn.com>
To. "Pam Brandmeyer" <phrandmeyerUaci.vaiLco.us>
Date: 8/12/02 12:50 PM
Subject: Fw: Mountain Bell Atfordabie Hausing Froject
Original Mes:;age
1=roni: <Mjoernchugh@aoi.com>
To: Ctowncouncil(aJci.vaia.co.u,U
Cc: <jflamantCq)vail.rnet>
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:05 PNi
Subject: Mountain Beil Affordable Housing Project
> We are East Vail property owners and believe tlzat ttie proposal for the
> developn3ent of the Mountain F3e11 sate is not campatible with the desired
> bcauty of Vail's maon entrance and is in direct conflict wich the planned
>"Front Daar" prajecc intended to imFrove and beautify Vail'S Yllail3 aGCeSS,
> Tlie size and design of the proposed project are grossly incornsiscent with
tlie
a upscale image Vail tries to convey.
* Additianally, we understamd that the cost of the project will render the
> necessary rental rates decidediy unaffordable ta flie overwhelming majarity
Qf
> the seasonal emplayees for whom it is inter?ded, thereby defeating the
purpose
> of thc entire prr,jeeC.
> The altemative prnposal sEt,forth by Gail Steadman in the August 7th
i,tiue
~ > of the Vail Daily makes a lot rnore sense feom many perspeetiwes.
>
> Sincerely, Brenda 8r. Joe Mcilugh, 4014 13ighorn Road,'Jail
~
~ file:01C:OWindowsll'EMPIGW f40002.HTM 8012/02
Page 1 of 1
Pam Brandmcyer -Fw: Mountain Bell Site Proposal
~ CT.'..'.x^.ve^.~ff+~i+411~i65r.0ed+f1W ~"..'Mv,trRG`A'RSEiN:'~tdl:i:'FNh4rvitrPU@fiih'.i~ . . . . . . . .'9Y5YKNd°Jl . . .
Frorn: "DIANA L)C7NOVAN" <dianamdonovangmsn.com3
To; "Parn Brandineyer" <pbx•andmeyer~ci.vaiLco.us>
Date: 8/12f02 12:48 PM
Subject: Fw: Mountain Bell Site Proposal
Original Message
From: Scorpio404
To: towncauncil@ci.vail.co.us
Sent: Sunday, Augusf 11, 2002 11:19 AM
Subject: Mountain Bell Site Proposal ~
Dear: Mayor a.nd TQwn Cauncil
Planning and Environmental Cornmissiarv`Design Review Baard
We, as praperty owners, believe tnat the size af the proposal for the Mountain BeII Site is
incompatible with the beauty and world-class scenic image of Vail's main entrance.
We urge the Town of Vail ta significantly reduce the size of the housizag prQject or mrave it to a mare
appropriate venue. While we all recagnize the importance of affordable employee housing, we urge
ihe Town to preserve and protect Vail's iinage as visitors first enGer our beautiful Village. As at all
other resorts, enlployee houseng should not be the first visual visitors will encounter. Truly
affordable employce housing shauld not be attempted where it is neither appropnate nor affardable.
~ There seems to be much more appropriate land available (i.e. the
rttins") for this purpUSe.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Debora Morris arrd SJ. Prapuolenis
Scospio #404
~
fiile:flC:lWindawsITEMl?1G WIUO(]O1.NTM 8/12f42
Page I of 1
Pann Srandmever - Fw: Day Care Center
From. "DIANA DO:niOVAN" <dianamdonovan9msn.eom>
To: "Pam Brandmeyer" <pbrandmeyer(a
,)ci.vail.co.us?
Date: 8/12i02 12:1 8 PM
Subj+ect: Fw. Day Care Center
Original Message
From: EMercyjr@apl.com
To: towncauncil@ci.vail.co,us
Sent: Saturday, Augus# 10, 2002 8:28 AM
5ubject: Day Care Center
Members Qf the Vail Town Council:
' I am writing to express our support for two criticaf issues which will impact the long term viability of Vail as an
dutstanding nationaJ resort.
The day care center shauld be expanded at its present site. It is an essential employee bene#it which is much
needed and is a logical use tha# would be compatible with the site.
Affordable housing rnust be a prirri#y. If Vail is to thrive as a destinatian resort it must be able ta at#ract service
employees in large numbers. Wi#hout hausing this simply will nat be possible. Sue and Gene Mercy Villa
Cortina 330.
~
~
fiie:/I+C:OV4'indows\TEMPOGW } (}0002.HTM 8/I 2/fl2
Page 1 of 1 I
Parin Brandmeyer - Fw: Mountain Bell Site
From: "DIANA DONOVaN" <dianarndonovanL&tnsn.cam>
To: "Pam Brandmeyer" <pbrandmeyer(&ci.vail.co.us>
Date: $/12l02 I2:09 PM
Subject: Fw: Mounta.xn Bell Site
Original Message
Fram: andy wiessner
To: towncouncil@ci.vaii.co.us
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:34 PM
Subject: Mountain Bell Sife
Dear Cauncil Members,
! am supportive af put#ing affordable housing at the Mountain Be!l site, but h4pe that in approving any project
yau will keep the following in mind:
fi.the praject be of sych a size as to blend in#o the t$rrain and forested area in the vicinity. In particular, the
taller trees on the site sheulti be preserved and the building(s) landscaped so that visual intrusion is minimized;
2. I think the drawings I have seen which tnvolve a 5 story structure(s), have buildings whECh are probably too
high for that partiGUlar location. Can the height be lawered ta 2-3 storiesd so that it is similar to the majarity of
the other developments on the north frontage road?
3. Paeking shou9d be underground.
~ 4. VERY IMPORTANTLY IN MY ivllNp, THERE SHdULD BE SdME SORT OF BRfdGE OR WALKWAY TC7
VjLLAGE SO THAT PEOPLE CAN GET THERE C7N FOOT. T'he current underRass at the Uail I-70 exit #oa
narrow (icy in wireter) is not adequate for peopfe to travel by foo#. It either neetis to be widened...or some sort of
foot bridge put acrosslunder the Interstate.ff foot access is not provided, there wil] be a traffic problem at the
rotary. If a foot path is too expensive...then, at Ceast, a kaus stop shduld be put at the entrance to the hausing
project..
Thank you foe consider9ng my wiews.
Sincerely.
Andy Wiessner
te1:970-476-6136
{
1
~
~
file:/iC:1Vl`indowslTEMF1GW}OQ00].HTM $112/02
Page 1 of 1
Parn Branc[meyer - Fw: Mountain Bell Site
From: "DIAI`1A DONOVAN" <dianamdonovancr;lnsn.com>
To: "Farn Brandmeyer" Cpbrandmeyer~ci.vail.eo.us>
Date: $112102 1 fJ:54 AM
Subject: Fw: Mountain Be11 Site
Original Message
From: SANewsam@cs.com
To: towncouncil@ci.vail.eo.us
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 4:20 PM
Subject: Mauntain Bell Site
Dear: Mayor and Town Council
Planning and Enviroaimental Commissian
Design Review Board
As a property owner, I beiieve that the size af the proposal for the Mountain Bell Site is incompatible
with the beauty and world-class scenic image of Vail's main entrance.
Please, significantly reduce the size of rhe housing project or inove it to a mare appropriate venue.
While we all recc,gnize the importance of affordable employee housing, I urge yau to preserve and
protect Vail's image as visitors first enter our beautiful Village. As at all other resorts, employee
housing should not be the first visual visitars will encounter. Truly affordable emplayee housing
should not be attempted where it is neither appropriate nor affordabie.
~ Sara A. Newsarn
~ file://C.l`J~'indawsITEMPIGWIOQ001,HTM 8/12f02
Page I af 1
Pam Brandmeyer - Fw: IViountain Bell Project
From: "DI.ANA DONUVAN" <dianamdonovan(a~msn.com>
To: "Pam Brandmeyer" <phrandmeyer(cuci.vail.co.us>
pate: 8112I(}2 10:31 AM
Subject; Fw: Mountain Beil Project
Original Message
From: <M14`K1851Cqaol.com>
To: Etowncouncii{~i;ci,vail.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 9:24 AM
5ubject: Mountain Bel] Project
> Dear Mayor and Town Gouncil, I am President of the Alphorn Candoniinium
.Associatinn at 121 West Meadow Drive. J speak for aiQ of our owners when I
express concem ahout ihe proposed Mountaiiti Bell Pro_ject. The massive size
of tlfe employee housing buiiding is totally inappropriate for tlie entrance
to Vail. Attractiveness tcr our visitors is a high priority, as we11 as
space to house our ernplayees. We hig3ily oppose the present plan and feel
that it must he re-visited in another forrn. Thaiikyou for your
consideration, Margie Ke11
~
~
~
file://C:1WindowsITEMPIGW i 00{}O 1.HTM $112/02
Page I of 1
Pam Brandmeyer - Fw: Mnuntain Bell Site ~
From: "DIANA D4NQVAN" <dianarndonovan~ir),msn.com>
Ta: "Pam Brandmeyer" <pbrandmeyercaCl.Vd1I.C4].UP
I)ate; $/12J02 10:3{} AM
Subject: Fw: Mc,untain Beli 5ite
Original NEessage ~
From: Gretchen Busse
Ta: Vai{ Town Courrcil
Sent; Wednesday, August 47, 2002 7:39 PM
Subject: Mountaira BeIG SAte
Mr. Mayor and Town Couneil,
We as properky owners, believe that the size of the proposal for the Mountain Bell Site is ineompatible with the
beauty and scenic image af Vail's main en#rance.
We urge the Town of Wail to move it to a more appropriake locat9on. We urge the Town to preserve and protect
Vail's image as visitors first enter our iaeautiful Village. As at all major resarts, employee housing shoufd not be
the first visuaf visitors encounter_ Truly affordabfe employee housing shauld not be a#tempted where it is
neither appreciate nor affordable.
Len and Gretchen Busse
~
I
I
~
I
~
file:/fC:1Vv"indawslTEMP1GW}00002.HTM $Il 2/02
. _
Pam 8randmeyer - Itr twn of vail vs mountaEn beLdat Page 10 !
- ~
~ E~1D7IFDOCD?ECF06F',DPauI J. and Katherine W. Dudzinski
3309 Canadian Park Way
Fart Callins, CO 80524
and
Skaal Hus I, Unit #4
141 W. Meadow Driwe
Vail, C4 81657
August 7, 2002
TowR of Vail
TawR Council
75 South Frontage Road, West
Vail, CO 81657
e-mail <towneouncil@ci.vail.co.us>
Fax: 970-479-2157
Dear: Mayor and Tcrwn Cauncil
Pianning and Enuironmental Comrnission
Design Rewiew Baard
We, as property awners, beliewe that the size of the proposal for the Mountain Beli Site is
incompatible with the beauty and vuorld-class 5cenic ira-iage of Vail()s main entrance,
We urge the Town of Vail to significan9y reduce the size of the housing pro}ect or to move it to a
more appropriate venue. While uve all recagnize the impartance of affordable employee hpusing, we urge
the Town ta preserve and protect Vai9Os image as visitors first enter our b?Leautiful Village. As at all
other resorts, emplayee housing should not be the first visual visi#ors will encounter. Truly affordable
~ emplryee housing shauld not be attempted where it is neither appropriate nar affordable.
We are well aware of the exciting plans that are being created for all of Uaif, including the Vaii
Front Door and Lionshead, etc. and are anticipating playing our part in helping it happen. We would be
much less interested in participating if this il1 conceived praject at the Mountain BEII 5ite goes through in
its current form. It is not corrgruent to Greate a well eonceived upgrade to our Village, and to #ry to use
outdatEd, less than a#tractive, plans far the ac#ua1 entrance from the interstate.
V11e hope you will reconsider at this important stage in pEanning, as the future outcame wfll be of
great importarrce to Vaik as a whole.
Sincerely,
Paul J. Dudzinski, M.D.
Katheriroe W_ Dudzinski
z'JyyN Li ??O ??C7DSET,oyy.HOOaoYYYP_ YYYr F?6?C)?"uL=pLJ~1'4.D 11 a0 ?6?a?o?yY~'~YY~no
?=p?'/~aSET°ryy.Hnn€[]tstLlYYYLYYYuF?"?o ?u~/<?D ?°LIC)?C ??F_yyo?n"ao?O??ii ???yy6oyjr*
C11?=p?'f-0QSUM'?CPaul DudzinskiHDNILSTYLC]oeGOUjiyOD?STYL?FOA?FIFIFFI"DFll;t?FLIT?F
~
Page 1 0f I
Pant Brandmeyer - Fw: ~
~ Fram: "i]IANA D0N4VAN" <dianamdonovan(a,n,n.carn>
'I o: "Fam Beandmeyer" <pbrandaneyetCq)ci.vaii.co.us>
UaCe: 81 ] 21Q2 l a:26 AM
Subject. Fw:
Unginal Metisage
From: eBi11_MorEOn(cf;^jackmorion.com>
To: <towncouneil(a;ci.vail.co.us>
Sent: Wedneticlav, August 07, 2002 3_29 P1VI
Dear Mayor and Town Council
I'lanning and Environmental Comtnission
Desr'git Review Board:
I have reviewed the plans, size and scope of the building for the
prc7pcrstd Mountain Bell Site. I3ust wanied tca iircrp you t1tis note ta
tell vou tiiat 1 bclicve tl7at it does not fit with the look and the
ianage of the rnain entrance to Vai]_
I had spokcn with several of you, and again vid this ncate encouracye
you to significantly reduce the size or rnave it to a more
appropriate Iocation. A13 of us recognize the importance of
af#`arciable ernployee housinn, but frorn all that i can assess, I don't
helieve it's truly affordable nor appropriaRe.
Sincerely,
~
Wiltiam MoxYOn
I
I
~
~ } I
I
I
~
file://C:1WinciowslTENIPIGW } 00(}02.HTI1!i 8112/02
Page 1 ot' 1
Pam Brandmeyear - Fw; Mountaen Bell Site apposition
~:T• F:-ia::YuY.••`~•.•'.•••'9"X~rXa.'iL°'~„?b`Y~'°#~ . _Ak^.iF~Ent'G?2CAIYi* 3WYQ.~ '
From: "DIANA DOIVQVAN° cdianamdonovana,msn.com>
To: "Pam $randmeyer" <phrandmeyer(tici.vail.co.us?
t}ate: 8r' 12/02 10:21 AN€
Subject: Fw: Mouncain Bell Site oppQSitiQn
Original Message
From: <Mikhaley(a;aol.com>
To. <towncouncill,~d?ci.vail.co,us>
Seiit: Wednesday, Au-ust 07, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Mountain Bell Site opposition
> Dear Mayor & Town CnunciI, Flanning and Environrnental Commission Design
> Review F3nard:
.
> We as propeety awners, believe that ihe .ize of the propnsed affordable
• hntising projecd at tl7e Maunt.aiti Bell skte is incompatiUle with beauty and
• wnrld-class scenic imagc af Vai3°s main entrance.
3
= We urge the Town af Vai] to significant]y reduce the size of the housing
? projeet or move it to a more appropriate venue. While we all recognize the
> importance of affnrdable ernployee housing, we urge the tawn to preserve
and
> protect Uail's iniage as visiEors frst enter our beautiful villabe. As at
al] I
> otlier resorts, employee housing ,hould not be the first visual visitors
wi 11
> encounter. Truly affordable employee housing 41iould not he attempted where
~ it
> is neither appropriate nor affnrdable.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mike I-ia[ev
> 1860 Meadow Dr., #3
> Vail, C~
~
~
file:i/C:rwindows\TEMP\GwI(oaoOI.xTM 8/12ro2
Page 1 of 1
Pam Srandmeyex -Fw: I'vlountain Bell Site Praject
~ Frc?m: "D1ANA DONQVAN" <dianarndonovancimsn.cam>
'Cn: "Pam Brandnieyer" <pbrandmeyer(a&i.vaii.co,us>
Date: 8I12;'02 I0:14 AM
Subject: Fw: Mountain Beal Site Project
Original Message .
Froni. "Ginny Culp„ <gculp(a?varl.net>
70: <lowncnuncil{q~zi.vail.CO.us>
Sent: Monday, August OS, 20(}2 9:46 PM
5ubject: Mountain Bell Site Pro,ject
> Dear Tawti Cauncilperson,
>
> 1'm warried chat we are awfirlly clo5e to starting something that asn't
=goi9tg ta deliver what anvhody u~anta. I'm worried about who iw in the
driver's seat on this Midc~le Creek (Mountain Bell site) hnusine project_
>
% Mv concerns include:
> y
> T. Vail resident's ay,ets and tax dollars are going ta build rental
> liousiitg for eniplayees of busiitesses in ilie Tawn of Vail_ T dcrn't
> helieve t13is is an apprcapriate u;;c of taxpayer dollars. I think it is
> tiiic if the TOV buifds housing for THEIR empiqyees, but I bc;liewe
> buildin-'providing ]tausing for private business's ecnployees Uught to be
> cinne by private sector money.
> 2. 'I'here are thoye who thittk this is costfng the TOV nothing. Wrong.
> The va1ue af the land at the entraoice to Vail is warth.hc,w much would
~ > you think? Leasing it on a very lang-term basis at no cost is not
' fielping the taxpayer get any return on a huge asset. Additionallv the
> coualcil 1ias spent tens of thousands of dollars in the planning phases.
> 3. The entrance to Vail will be ctianged farever. It is like putting
> TimberRidee as our first greeting to guests. (Yes, once a town council
> thought TimberRidge looked gaod')
> 4. I understand that the rents will shake out at a minimunz of $650 ,a
> bed. I, that aftnrdable? GiveEi the site, costs coiild easily escalate
= resaltsng in euen hiiihcr rental rates.
>
> Additionaity I 11ave cancerns, givcn the current economy, that ihis
> project may actually be underfunded. Today's do]iars are not what they
> were a mnnth ago. I'm uneasy t9ta1 there will be lots af corner cutting
> in the constrs.ic.tion. Once it is started, if dhe project isn't comple[ed
> by the developer. who pays Yo have it compleced? Banding doesn°t cover
> the full cost of the project, does it?
>
> Thcre will be much redevelopmefit in Vail Village and Lsonslaead in the
> next five years. This will provide a perfect opportunity to inckude
> eniployee housing in tlyc nGw designs and to liave the right people paying
? fnr it..tEie emplavers. And thcy will have more interest in making the
> units look gaod antl fit into their locatic,n.
~
= I urge you Fa think nyore carefully a6aut this important decision. I
> helieve there are better ways to serve the ertaployee and the residents of
> Vail.
>
> Ginny Cufp
>
>
~
file:f/C:1WindawslTEMP1GWt0{}OOI.HTM 8112f02
~
I
I
~ Paul J. and Ka#herine W. Dudzinski
3309 Canadian Park Way
Fort CoIlins, CA 80524
and
Skaa[ Hus I, Unit #4
141 W. Meadow Driue
Vall, CO 81657
August 7, 2002
Town of Vail
Town Council
75 5outh Frontage Road, West
Vail, CC7 81657
e-mail <towncouncilCci.vail,co.us>
Fax: 970-479-2157
Dear: Mayor and Town Council
Planning and Environmental Cammissian
Design Review Board
We, as proRerty awners, believe that the size of the proposal for the Mountain
Befl Site cs ineompatible wi#h the beauty and warld-ciass scenic image of 1Jail's main
~ entrance.
We urge the Town of Vail to significanly reduce the size of the hausing praject
or to move it to a more apprapriate venue. While we all recagnize the impartance of
at#ordable employee housing, +uve urge the Town to preserve and protect Vail's image
as visitors first en#er our beautiful l/illage. As at all ather resarts, empioyee housing
shQUkd not be the first visual v'tsitors wilf encounter. Trufy affordable employee
housing should not be aftemp#ed where it is neither appFapriate raor affordable.
We are well aware of the exc'rting paans that are being created for all of Vai1,
including the Vai! Front Door and Lionshead, etc. and are anticipatang playing our park
in helping it happen. V'Ve would be much less interested in participating if this ill
conceived praject at the Mountain Bell S'rte goes through in its current form. It is not
cvngruent tv creatE a well canceived upgrade to our Village, and to try ta use
outdateel, less than attractive, plans for the actual entrance frorn the interstate.
We hope you wifl reconsider at ihis impartant stage in planning, as the future
nutcome rrvi1l be of great importance to Vail as a whole.
sin erely,
~
Paul J. Du inski, M.D.
~ Katherine W. Dudzinski
. HARLEY G. HIGBIE, ]R.
1600 Brvadway, Suite 1400
Denver, C4 80202
~ 303-861-42 30
Fax 303-8 30- i 465
August 12, 2002
The Tawn af Vai!
Vail, CD 81657
1Ne are veryr much aware of the need tor employee housing. During Vai!'s very
first winter we were forced to bed dmwn employees in the laundry raam af The
Lodge, causing Jack Tweedy and me #o try to initiate an employee housing
praject. We failed.
As much as we favar the cancept, the proposed praject at the 8ell site is toa big
and tao prominent. It would be unfortunate for the entrance to Vail to be defined
~ by a housing project. aur image is toQ impartant.
A smalier building that is well-hidden, ar another lacation, wauld be our
preference.
Sincerely,
Lorraine and Harle Hi '
gr
~
j•d S9bT-OEB-EQE AwudWOo 1I0 SIJINif1uo e5T :TT atl aT 2nd
67/29/2062 19:56 9704762933 KaSSDN CO PRGE el
~ ThursdaY} August 08, 2402
Dear: IViayor and Town Council
P}ar,ning and Enviranmer?tal Commission
Design Review Board
We, as Vail property owners, have stadied the plans for the Mountain Bell Sitc
and are quite disturbed. Too denude this site of its beautxful tzees to huild such a
large (an not very amactive) structure seems ou# af synch with ovr desire ta have
Vail a more beautiful place in which to live and to viszt.
We suggest the Town of''wrail sigmificantly rcduce the size af the hausing project
or rnove it to a mc?re agpropriate venuc. A.ffosdahle employee housing is
important, But locating it at our main entrance, in its aurrent configuaration, seems
to defeat the purgose of a mare attraetive Vail.
Signed:
~ Elna and Bruce Kasson .
~
M4 lA4~Q. rv,.
~
I ~
I
~
Poms-hopH
416 VAIL VALLEY QRiVE
PHbNE (970) 476-5646 VAIL, CC)LURApO 91657 FAX (970) 476-0301
I
~
August 7, 2002
Town of Vail
Tawn Council
75 South rrontage Road, VVest
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mayor and Town Cauncil
For several months we have been following the discussions regarding the Mountain Bell
5ite. The size of the praject propased far this site is nat compatible with the world class
~ image of Vail. This project i5 the entry to Vail anti the first impression for guests and
residents alike.
We urge the Town flf Vail to either significantly reduce the size of the housing project or move it to a more appropriate location. Althaugh we understand that affordable
emplayee hausing is critical for the Town, we also believe first impressioras xs a critical -
issue to Vail as well. We have only one rnajor entry ta Vail and this is not the
appropriate lacation for affardable housing. We urge you to evaluate this issue carefully
as the effects of this decisian are very long term.
Sincerely
4
Nc~ an D. Kurtz, Presi nt
Rams Horn Condorniniu Association
~
~ MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Enviranmental Commission
FROM: Community Developmeni Department
DATE: August 12, 2002
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Cauncil to amend the
Donavan Park Master Plan and a request for a final review of an
amendment tQ the previously approved development plan, to allow for the
canstruction of the Donovan Park pavilion and associated improverraents,
located at 9600 S. Frontage Rd. WesUUnplatted.
Applicant: Tawn of Vail, represented by VAg, Inc.
Planrter. George Ruther
L SUMMARY
4n July 22, 2002, the Planning and Environmental Commission conditionally
approved a request far the final review of an amendmen# ta the previously
appraved development plan allawing far the construc#ion of the [7onavan Park
Pavilion and associatecP improvements. [n approving the request, however, the
~ Commission placed a condition an their appraval requiring #he applicant to return
to the Planning and Environmentai Commission meeting an Augusr 12, 2002, for
review and approval af revisions to the front entry drop-off and rear entry service
areas. Staff is recommending appraval af the applicant's reques# as we believe
that the propasaf is in compliarace with the criteria of such a propasal. Staff's
analysis of the criteria can be faund in SectEon V of this memorandurrr.
!I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant, the Tawn of Vail, represented by VAg, Inc., is requesting that the
Planning and Enviranmental Commission review and approve the praposed
revisions to the front en#ry drop off and rear entry senrice areas. The applicant
has revised the plans to improve the 5ense o# arrival to the pavilion as well as
redesigned the service area configuration in respanse to cancerns expressed by
#he Planning and Environmental Camraiissivn. The applicant has inereased the
amount of landscaped area at the front entrartce to the pavilian and significarotly
redesigned the rear service area. The redesign of the rear service area was
intended #o imprave the ability to screen the area and cluster the uarious pieces
caf equipment in one area_
CII. BACKGROUND
~ In 1980, the Town of Uail acquired a 51 acre parcel of {and in the Matterhorn
area o€ West Vail. The parcel was described as having three distinct areas; the
upper bench, mictdle bench, and lower bench. The Iower bench is approximateiy
12 acres in size and would later ias determined as the best opparfunity+ for a
l
cornmunity park deuelapment due to its easy access and prime creekside ~
locatian.
In 1985, the Vail Town Cauncil adapted #he Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan
~
Park Master Plan. The purpose of this plan is ta provide aframework fcar i
deeision-making araund the deWelopment of these two valuable park land sites.
The plan prescribes standards ancf design guidefines for implementation ta
ensure that these twv open space parcels rneet the recreation needs of the
residents and visitors to the Vail area.
In 1999, the Vail Tpwn Council initiated a study of the potential community
facilities for the Town of Vail. This study inciuded multiple sites around #own and
among thern was the lower bench of Donovan Park. The results af the study
concluded that the lower bench of Donovan Park was the mast appropriate
locatian for a new community park and a new community park pawilian.
In 2000, the Vail Town Council adopted the Donovan Park Master Plan
Amendment. This plan is an amendment to #he originally adopted Gerald R. ~
Ford and Donovan Park Master PEan. The expressed purpose o# the plan is to
provide an upda#ed re#Iection o# cammunity needs, concerns, and priorities as
they relate to the lower berach of Donovan Park. While seeking to presenre the
overall site values and design guidelines of the 1985 Donovan Park Master Plan,
this arnendment expands and clarifies anticipa#ed and desired community uses
of the property.
In 2041, tFae Vail Touvn Councii directeti the Donovan Park Design Team tv move ~
farward wi#h the preparation of design/development drawings for Phase I
improvements to the new park. Later that year, the Tawn of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission approved a request for a canditional use permit and
approved development to allow far the construction of the park and community
park pavilion. Aetual park construction was started shortly thereafter and has
been progressing towards completion.
In 2002, responding tn construction cost considerations, the Vail Town Council
initiated a redesign process of the comrnunity park pavilion and associated
improvements. The redesign process has since been cornpfeted and the
applicant, the Town of VaiR, is now requesting finai review and approval of an
amendment to a previously approved developrnent plan.
According to the 1faia Land Use Plan and the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map,
the lower benGh ofi Donovan Park has a 9and use designation as "Park" and is
located within the General Use Zone aistrict.
On July 22, 2002, the Planning and Environmental Carnmission approved a I
reques# far an amendment to the previausly appraved development plan for
Donovan Park. The approval included two conditions.
IV. ZC)MING ANALYSIS ~
The applicant is proposing the following devekopment standards as provided on
the propased Approved Development Plan:
2
?
~ Develapment
Standards Approved Proposed
Lot Areal 539,011 sq. ft. 539,011 sq- fit.
Site Dimension: 12.374 acres/ 12.374 acres/
Setbacks: As shown on As shown on
the Approved the Approved
pewelapmen# Develapment
Pian Plan
Building Height: 38.6 fk, 32.9 #t.
Density Control: N/A N/A
Site Goverage: 9,449 sq, ft. 6,08{} sq. ft.
(1.$%) (1.1°/'0)
Parkirag/Loading: 145 spaces 143 spaces
rnin. min.
Outdoar Terrace Area: 2,900 sq. ft. 3,750 sq. ft.
~ Pavilion Area: Approx. 6,200 sq, ft. 5,350 sy- ft-
V. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Accarding to the Oificial Town of VaiR Zoning Map, the iower berrch af Donovan
Park is located within the General Use Zane District. Pursuant to Section 12-9C-
1 of the Vail Town Code,
"The General Use Drstrict is infended to provide sifes for publiG and quasi-
publrc uses whrch, bccause af their special characterisfics, cannot be
approprlately regulated by the development standards prescrrbed far
other zoning districts, and for which development standards especrally
prescribed for each particular development proposal or projeet are
necessary to achieve the purposes prescrrbed in Secfion 92-1-2 vf thrs
Title and to provr`de for the public welfare_ The General Use Dfsfrrct r`s
intended ta ensure that publrc bUildings and graunds and cerfarn fypes of
quasr-public uses permlfted in the Dlstrict are appropriafely located and
designed to meet fhe needs Qf residenfs and vrsrfars to Vail, to harmonrze
with surrounding uses, and, in the case of 6uildings and other strucxures,
to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and ofher amenities
appropriafe fo fhe permrtted fypes of uses.,,
~ Furtherrriore, development standards for development within the General Use
Zone District shall be proposed by the applicant and prescribed by fhe Planning
and Environmental Commission. The approveci development standards shall be
as indicated on the approved development plan. An approved development plan i
3
I
sha91 be used as the prineipal guicfe for all development in the General Use Zone ~
District.
Approved development plans may be amended. Amendments to an approved
development plan shall be consfdered in accordance with the provisions outlined
in the Vail Town Code. Additianalfy, an approved development plan and any
subsequent amencfinents thereto shall require the approval of the Design Review
Board, in accordance with the appficable pravisiQns af Chapter 11 (Qesign
Review) of the Vaii TQwn Code prior to the cammencement af site preparation.
The following criteria shall be used as the principal rneans f4r evafuatFng a
praposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to
demonstrate that the prapased development plan corriplies with all applicable
design criteria:
A. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale,
massing and arientation is compatible with the site, adjacen#
praperties and the surraunding neightaorhood.
The applicant has praposed revisians to the design af the paWilion with
respect to architecture, character, scale, massing, and arientation. The
original pavilion design was more contemporary in nature with a
significantly different overall look. The scale of the original pavilion was i
larger by approximately 15% and had a maximum alEowable building
height of 38.5 feet. The revised propasal suggests a pavilion of ~
approximately 5,350 square feet of interior space and a maximum
building height nat to exceed 33 feet. While both designs ariented the
Views of the south side of the pavilion towards the creek, the new design
has been rotated on a clockwise axis to improve views out of the pavilion.
Both designs, howewer, have the paviRion located withEn #he same building
envelope area. It is because of these reasons that staff believes that the
amended cfesign praposal complies with #he building design eriteria.
B. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and
tocated to praduce a functianal development plan responsive ta the
site, the surrounding neighbarhood and uses, and the community a$
a whale.
The proposed amendment to the approved development plan does not
request changes to the use of the buildings, improvernents, uses, ar
activities on the site. While the applicant is propc?sing ta substantially
increase the size of ihe outdoor terrace area, largely in part to
accammodate a 20' x 40' temporary ten#, staff believes their intention was
to use the outdoor terrace area for functians occurring within the pawilion.
Staff believes that this criteria has been met and that few, if any, negatEWe
impacts will result from an approval a# this amended approved
development plan request.
. C. Qpen space and landscaping are both functianal and aesthetic, are ~
designed ta preserr?e and enhance the natural features of the site,
maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, proviafe
adequate bufferirsg between the proposed uses and surrountiing
4
~ properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing apen
space and recreation areas.
With the minor exception vf inciirect changes ta the development plan to
accommodate the redesigned pavilion and assaciated improvements, the
applicant is not praposing any changes that staff be9ieves will negatirrely
irnpact open space and Eartdscaping on the site. In staff's opinion, the
praposed development plan cnntinues to presenre and enhance the
natural features of the site, maximize opportunities far access and use by
the public, provides substantial buffering between uses and surrounding
properties and is well integrated with the existing open space in the
vicini#y.
D. Apedestrian and vehicufar circulatian system designed to provide
safe, efficient and aesthetically pleasing circulatian to the site and
throughout the deuelopment.
The applicant is proposing to relocate a portion of the recreation path on
the site. The relocated path will continue ta connect to pavilion and other
park areas to the existing bpke path aEong tFae stream. The new path
location is propnsed to go around the northerly perimeter ai the "preserve
area°. According to the Danovan Park Master Plan Amendment,
"This area (preserve area) should be preserved in its existing ~
~ condifian, wifh orrly a recreatian pafh running afong fhe toe of the
existing slope an its north edge. "
and,
"Developmenf shauld ke lfrnited to a possible recreatian path
alang the area's perimeter."
E. Enviranmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been
identified in the pr•oject's environmental impact report, if not waived,
and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of
the proposed development plan.
The requirement for an environmental impact report was waived for this
project, thus rendering this criterion inapplicable.
F. Compfiance with the Vail Gomprehensive Plan and other applicable
plans.
The Planning and Environmental Commission had determined that the
original proposal was in compliance with the Vafl Camprehensive Plan,
the Town of Vail Open Lands Plan, and the Donovan Park Master Plan
Amendmertt. Staff believes that given the rather minor changes to the
approved development plan to accommodate the redesigned pavilion
architecture, the amendment to the appraved development p6an continues
to cornply with #he goaPs and objectives of the Vail Comprehensive Pian
~ and ather applicabfe plans.
5
I
VL STAFF RECC)MMENC}ATION ~
The Communi#y Development Departrnent recommends approval of the request
for final review of an amendrrment to the prerriously approved development pl'arr
for Danouan Park, Staff's recommendation for approval is based upQn the
review of the proposal as outlined in Section V of this memorarrdum and the ~
testimony and evidence presented. Should the Planning and Environmental ~
Corrrmissian choose to approve the request, staff recommends that the fallowing ~
fndings be made: I
i
"That upon review of the propnsed amendment to the previously
approved developmenf plan for ponovan Park, the Planning arrd
Envrronmental CQmmission finds ihat the amended approved
developmerrf plan, as praposed, complies wifh the six criteria outlined in
Seetion V of this memorandum and that the amerrded approved
development plan wiJf ensure the unlffEd development, the protecfion of
the natural environment, the compatibilify of the use with surroundrrag and
acljacenf land uses and meets the irrtent and pu,rpase of the Genera! Use
Zone District. The CQmmission°s defermination of findings is based upon
review Qf the criferia and the testimany and evidence presenfed on fftrs
application. "
~
Shoufd the Planning and Environmental CammissNOn choose to approve the ~
request for an amendment ta the previousiy approwed develQpmen# plan for
Donovan Park, staff wauld rec4rnmend the following condition of approvaL i
~
1, That the applicant submits a complete design review boarci applica#iorr #o
the Tawn of Vail Cammunity Department for review and appraval by the
Tov4rn of Varl Qesign Review Board, prior ta making application for a
building perrnit for the community park pavilion.
VI1. A7TACHMENZS
A. Reduced Drawings
;
n
~
6
aN... -
w~wD
'Pn
~'fL(~ JQQMO~ ![8~3 ~i ~ 3 Qi
I~ ~,las~'~riliiE~~X
•~~k~, ~~I ~I f;< 1 r N~1 uennuoQ 1e uomn~~
~
. •
• I
i
~
~
• ~
~ C).
ct
t~ c';j
~ >
ct
._.EE.. I
~
~
~r
C.~
~
•
d quauapettd
M
0 Qe710J, i.Q
TruA J
~
)(:MdTIEAOUACI ]eQOi[TAL,f
~
~ai:
~a ~q~ . 1 ~s
4.J~y
.
~ ~ ~ . .
~ / ~ ~ •1 h i ,S, } 's .
~,7, L4~.
~ ~ . ~I r / r•'; " '.T ~~,'r`~`^~-~~~ ~y4
~ \ f x
( ~ ~ . : /i .
{ ~`i ~ 4 ` ~ f;~~' . / ~ •+r ~'~r~ ° ii ' , ~
f~.'~s ~ z ~ / ~ y i~ . ~ ;w ~
~ S`~,-.~f ~ .f~Te=-~t _
; •
f • r
/ ,-a-
~ .
~ ` i ~ . . 1 f 1 . . I .
~
W»
f, ~ ' ~ ?f ~yf ~ ~ ~ 4 ~
7T j - I \ '`f~._ ~i
@- ~ ~ ~ • • i ~ ~ .
{/*trtf
/ ~ t al \ r ~
,
CI I n_ ~ = r1 V
t
a V' r ~ B ~
I
V q
y t i I~ I ti'
m pl
~^:3?~r~ ti ~ ~f ~ I~ ~ °V~JOl~7 `I!~h ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~
IMn,1OUMO.T,
Ji1tj ilEAOUOQ 1E IIO[[EAEd
1• . --1 =~.ra~
. .
, _ . /
. _ . 7
i~
•
~ ~(y 1'•~ ~O > ~~'tl
~ `r t
R 1 '
~
.
~ v . ,
~ . :ni "
} ~ ~V ~ ~i • Y , .
~ ~5. ~ ~ .c.' ~ .~^'~J9,.A ~ <,v~,~,lA _ ~ •E ~ _ ?
r !.r Y~,i.%:~~s~,--~,;,.~;,r_y..- . 4 i! I
a~
. . .
f~ ~.~j z~` t j:~ • ,q,~~.,~r,..cs,~~:, ,w. t^"'~..~*.~}~,' ,ti"~ y' 1
~ ~ ~ ^h~ J rn t- 'ry,4L . . ^z~. ,ryhy. S "Y. ~~y 15 ,
'•t ~u~ ~ a ~9i : ~ ~ , 4~ : •;L` ~
1~ ~ C n d 7
~ i.~ ~0° '~-~~rY •~~~M~r ~
. ~ ~ ~1 \ ?
J ~ a 1 u
j
'n+~/ : K lYe~n
„ } 4~ . -
r
~ ~f~ r ?
~
N w 7 R ~y: A ~a ~F .
~
~ . -z '
~
/ F:•.-: :.~.~.n~. ' rv ~ ~
((0~
.t , ` 4 . : :i ~ ~ ~r~ ~ ' ~ - m f
X ~l
W~nl°J
~~3l?~eA3oUA%o.L
Dt3EjIIEAOlIO{jjE[IOL~IAEd ~ - y Sf{ai~ -V„~^
i k
! s. ^ o, n ~ Q k
i . ~
mr;
! 4 3 j ~ I-
-
a ~ I
i i I r 1 E~ ; yI
- i f
m { ~ ~ - - - -~---~J~-
I e ~ ~ ~ j ` ~
I I.-~ ! ~ I V ~ ~
- ~ . , ,
I lciy I I
-~---~•-I ----`--_-_~---y-----~------~I °h- I-
~
~ s
I I I I I I I~~r~ I
~ -i , I I I I I . I 5 ~
~ ~ -e; ~ I - - , - - i ,
G
-li
'E ~ - I . 'r-::.; •
4gj'
r 9
L R I
j I, ~r~{ ~-"rE I~~ ~ I ~ ~~l ~ _~i
r,
I`
m
I ~ m a I k
- - - - - -
~
2:
- ---F----;-~-~~ --r~----
I I ~
I J
W
I J
~ . ~
i ~
~ ~~~,:~~{i' I,~~I~ 3~~~7~ : IreA3o anna,I, ~ ~ ~s~a: ' I3 g , "'•j~
]iJMd QEAOIIp(IJEIIOSttAE~
"
~
r ~
p
lLj,-
44--
I-Oj~ . . _ i
-;I'
~Y' L •,f ~1 ~ f~ - I I ~
_1 e
_
i
• ------~r. _ .
~i -
,
~n.
- 'i - i :
i _
' ~ . `----'-i-'--
i
E• i i : I
R.•,:, ,
,r . _ . . _ , . _ _ . . , , . . . LP
F.~. ~ r_.-„ ~•~a_~^ - --'=~V~- I
~ ~ - : - --}p----
~
~
~I ~ I I - i I I I• ,
r
~ I- ~ - r _ - - -
t
C ~
~ 5
g v'Y~ u' i~ i [ nR+"1°J `!'A ~ A a eI ?1
o unna1.
7
~fY ~ tLff',3 ~3i'•iL . ~A3 ~ "~I j 390&C~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ SY11
~ ~ AJed ulEnovOIC 1e Qol~inEd a a I
d I I ~ r
I I i I
c~~--~---~-------
T r~, ~
J- ~
G~ - - - _ - rl _ _ _
r
ir11 i i -
' - - -
! I ~
,
- - ~ ' - - - ~
C~~---`~, ,
~
~ . ~ ~
~y~:
- ~ .
tu
~ ~;.~1---~- ~ 0 4
s-I---I----_-----
. _ I I I T
~
I ~
i
_
S$
P~
L:J
.4 N
o----- ~ M,
~ ~ r \ Utl
/
~ • f di
y
w
-
~ w
~ ~
m • a''j
`..i V
q @- E[ I r 3 x'.v, O D C'`~ ~
jTT!A 10 IIMQ,1, i ~~3839~ V n p r C+'S~
14~~;~,f(~~~E€l~:3J~I~~~~e ~ )(1-ed uenoaaqIeuorYuej
I
tl I
T
f
~ - - - - - J~ ; ,i;
' i
~
Q- ~ -
~ ~ ~ - - -
/
~j f~----_ - - - - - - ,
-
~
-
f
~
I I ' 1,
I bl ~I ~ ~ ~1
~
~J- - t - - - - i ~
~ ~
,
f
I
I
~ ~ -
w - - - -
-
I
I I !
' I f I I
~R
;
I
r
Q
1 W
W
. ~ o ~
f~ .5~~'-"-8•'~3i ' ~f j! ~r ` ~ ~S~9s °a f e t`'~.
~ ~ ~ rta~~~2~ :Ei~j~~}~_~~ ~ IteA;aantal,
€ 1~"9~a! u
xSka STE AOCIOa lLQ(3m AEa
,
~~x•
s
~ ' Q-'.------L--'
f 5,. I f I I ~i
~ ~ q,66g{ ~ ~ ~ t _
S -k f-. . ~ - _ - _ _ _ _ - ~ ~
m - - - ; ~
~
~1_- -77
I
. . , . . _ . . . . . .
~ E ~ • I ~ ' ~ ~ f \
- ~ o - - ~
C~--
~
~
.
Q - s -sy
- I I f
I I I ry~~
J Z
JI r
- - - - - ~ ~
•i P ~
i
~
~
•
~
i ~
r
~ ~
i a v r - - - - - - - ~ I
I
I I ~Z I ~
I ~ w~ ~ I
r r--------~ ~
I I LU I I
I i ~ I I
I ~ ~z I I
I I uU, ~ I ~ - ~
~ o~ r---~-----~ I
I ~ w
~ - I U I ~ s
~
--L =J--
r -
~ I p~ I ~ I
w ~ J
~ d
~ o I uc~~ I ~
I p I N 0 I ~
I I I I
I a ~ ~ I
P L - - - - - - - _ - - - ~ I .
~
~ ~ a°. , ii ` ~I I ~ ~ I ° il ~ ~ ~r il • ~ ~
I ~
~ I
~ L --------------------------J
V Ag, InC. YROIECTN.4ME: YR07FGTh0: 2228. PE{ASE:
Pavilion at Danovan Park DD
A AMO«,s ~ Pl ~nn«s
Town of Vail sHELM
r: C9 11636 II}a
• 0 ~ (470) 944.7033 pRAW'NG'F]TLE: ~
fu; (470] 944.8I34
-1: ~~~~.•N.~~uF«n Flan at Trash Enclosure
~~c.; inc ]SSL7HDA"I'E: 08.02.02 RE: DRf1
~ rtrnir•- in^=i'~^ ? v~~
I
~
R=F: 2fA'15 FOR
l ~ ~ r T1'P1CAL. EAVE
pETAIL FASGIA
FRAI"IlNG
7xU SILL " RaUF FRAMlNG,
F''LATE, ~ REF: 5TRUGi'
1`YP '
. ~ - _ _ - - - - - _ _ - . ~
rax~ Gfi"IU ~ I LIJOC:D C~ATE~a
9
EDGE OF CMU
U1ALL 5E1`OND
Ln I I ~
• ~ ~ SNOw-N=LrEQ ~
I ~ co~c acc~~~
DRIvE, RcF:
I ~ GfviL 4 t'1EGI-4
GRADE,
REF: GIvfL < L J S
T/a caINc
REF: GML
_Fi_I ! . 1 I I-{ll. ' fll° Pfl III' ; 1 I a° Ili i III ~II II 4111 ~
-I I I ~ I I I-I I'_ ~ i I I` I I ~
111=11IIfI ~ III III III III III-1
_ ! III Ilf-II RIL
=fkl~;' -111-, _i~
=111=~' 1-11!=' -11 L '
a ~ e
~ T/o F-aoraN(S
REF: 57RUwT
~ j
V Ag, IrIC. PROJEC7NA'.fE.- PROIE.CTNO: ~g. Pf~G15E:
prchimcsx dc Rlanncra pavilian at Danovan Park d°
~ `V Town of Vail s~Er:
V-ICU 1165t11~
(470) 949.7034 Dtvawrnra Trrr_E: 2
fat° (`~70) 9~S9.SI3d i
Section at Trash EncIasure ~
~ c we~n~...atia.asw~.mz sr-ni r,. in, _ i• n^ r. 7F-^7 v L1 i11 [SStfC DATF: 0$.02.01 RL; DR?.
} . - . . .
1
~
I
x
m J Q w
'utU
za
LLi
~
4 (L
C1
Cl
a
LU
Z LU f / q 65 ~~!w
~ '90s
m x uri)
~
I
I ~ f
~ I
~
I 1 I
I ~
I
I ~
I ~
~
1 1 /
~ .
J ;
I
I
- ~ ~
~
VA~~ Ine. PRO]ECiNA..~tE: PROJECCNQ: PH.45£;
A` A~h;«yt, Pavilion ak Donovan Park BD
HEef:
S~'awn of Vail
v,.s co erssc,ns.
t9701949.7034
Fyc: (970) 444.8934 DR.4+h'L~G 7lTl..E: 3
Front Elevatian at Trash Enclasure
cr^ns Ftn•- 4'.n^ r.~ .^0 c : v A ~ t~,c ISSUL-; PATE: 08.02.01 HE: DR'3
~ r
~
' I
~
~
,
F-I~!-~~U- ~
~~~~~o?~~a FnAINT ALL EXF='06E[:>
~ ~~~LJ~I-~?~~I~J~ GMU UJALLS 70 MATGH i
BllILDINCs STAIN,
. -EI??EER1~~FF-? ' iNTERIC?R d EXTERIOR
I~~ n~~ ~~EL1~~ .
FIDE
~'uO~L~~~~~?~a~... .
~~i-1~?~~~OL~Q
71FIE]00]C1C?71701C
~n~~n~~lnnn~~~~
~
•
Y t'ig1 IriC. P}tC11EC'I'NAhE: PR4IEGTIvD: 2228• PHASE: I1L7
~ ~ Architec[s & planners Favilion at Donovan Fark
S}LEEI:
L'iviCv e:esata). TV nil OI Y~
{970} 9~14.7034 qILtWCVG TITLE: ~
mul: ~ewalw..;a~c[v~u.c.,m
ra`:c9'D'94g.1Side Blevati+~n at Trash Enclosure
zvS .5ra~.f~ _~~•.n- v 4 . [ E Dn~: os.vz.c~z RE DR.B
I
~
~
11 '
GrOWN oF v~rL .
Department of Communi;ty Developrrrent
75 South Frontage Raad
Yarl, Colarado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
August 5, 2002 '
John M. Perkins, A!A
Box20Q7 .
Avon, CO 81 620
and
Planning and Environmental Comrnission
and
Adjacent Property Qwners ,
~
~ Re: A request for a minar amencfinen# to Specia! Develcaprnent District Na. 6 ta allaw for
#he eonversion of 650 square feet from lobby area (comman space) ta barlnignt club
space.
[7ear John, PEG members, and adjacent property owners:
Based upon review af the criteria and findings in Section 12-9A of the Vail Town Cade, staff finds
the above referenced amendment to Special Develaprnent aistrict Na, 6 is approved in accardance
with the procedures as identifiied in Section 12-9A-10 of the Vail Town Code, subjeet to the fiollowing
carrdition:
1. That the applicant not modify the uses of the SDD #6, including the number of ladging or
EHU units without following the procedures as outiirrecf in Sectian 12-9A-10 of the Vail Tavwn
Code.
Staff's approval af this minor special develdpment district amendment will be reported at a public
hearing before the Town of Vail k'lanning and Environrnental Cammis5ion on Manday, August 12tn
at 2:00 p.rn. in the Vail Town Councif Chambers, located at 75 S. Frontage Rd. The Planning and
Environmental Commission reserves the right to "cail up" a staff decision for additional review at this
hearing.
DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant, Club Cheisea, Tequested a minor amendment to Special Development District
No. 6, Vail Village Inn, to allow for the conversion of 650 sguare feet from lobby area to
0 bar/night club use, located at 123 South Frontage Road, V+Ihen the space operated as an
inn the area was used as the lobby and was open to the ViUager Restaurant and Bar
fhrough seueraf archecE openings. The conversion of the lobby (camman area) to barlnight
club use involues no exterior changes ia the buiiding.
RECLEAPAPER '
N~
A"rninor amencErnent" is defined as: ~
Morlrfrcaiiorts ta burlding ,plans, site ar landscape plans that do not alter the basrc
intentand characfer of the approved speciaCdevelopmentdistrict, and are consistent
wfth the design criteria of thls Chapter. Mrnor amendmen#s may include, but not be
lirrrited ta, variarians of not more than five feet (5) to approved set6acks and/or
bur`lding foofprrRts, ehanges to larrdsca,pe or sr'fe plans that do not adversely impacf
pedestrran ar vehicular circulation fhroughouf the special development districf; or
changes to gross flovr area (exclUding residential uses,? of rrot rnvre tharr five.
percent (5%) of the approved square faota,ge of retarl, office, common areas and
other nanresidential flcror area, excepf as prnvided under Sectians 12- 15-4 (Interior
Conversions) or 12-15-5 (250 Additranal GRFA) of this 7it1e.
11. CRITERIA ANQ FINDINGS
A. Section 12-9A-2: Minor Amenciment (staff r+eview): modifica#ions to buitding
plans that do raot alter the basic intent and character of the approved special
development distrtet and are consistent wi#h the design criteria of this
Chap#er.
Special Develapment District Nca. 6 includes ihe exisiing Vail Village ann, of v+rhich
Club Chelsea is apprtrxirrrately 3,827 sq. ft. This is a proposal to convert 650 square
feet of lobby (common space) into additional bar/night club area which requires an
additional 3 parking spaces per the Vaii Town Code. Staff fands that approval at this
proposal does not alter the basic intent and character of Special Develaprnent ~
D15tCECt No. 6, which curreniEy allows these uses. Additionally, the elimination of 26
accammodatian units (Building V) as a result of the June 10, 2002 conditional use
approval to convert aceammodation units to Type il! EHU units has left a surplus of
parking on the site totafing 22 spaces. There are na exterior modificateans incEuded
with this request.
B. Section 12-9A-10: Minor modifications consistent with #he de$ign criteria
outlined in subsection 72-9A-2 may be approved by #he Department of
Community Development. Notificatian o# a prapQSed minar amendment and a
report of staff action shall be provided to all property awners within flr
adjacent ta the district that may lae affected by the amendment. Notificativn
shall be pastmarked no later than 5 day following staff action on the
amendmen# and shall include a brief statement describing the amendmeni and
the time anci date of when the Planning and Enviranmental Commission will be
informed of the staff decision.
As nated above, staff finds that the amendment is cansistent with the design criteria
out9ined under subsection 12-9A-2. Natification of the hearing and a summary of the
propQSa.l will be prauided to all adjacent property owners within 5 days of today's
date. Staff's approval of the request will be reported to the Planning and
Ertvironmental Cammission on August 12, 2002. ~
III. PROCEDURE
Section 12-9 of the Town CocEe provides the pracedure for a rroinor amendment to a Special ~
Development District. The procedure is as follows:
2
i
• i
~ 12-9A- 10: pMENDMEN'T PROGEDURES:
A. Minar Amendments:
1. Minor madifications consrstent with the desigrr criteria outlined in
subsection 72-9A-2 (tlefinltion of "r°nlnor amendment') of thrs Article, may
be approved by the Ue,partment of Cammunrty Devefopment A1f minor
modifications shali 6e rndreated on a completely revrsed development
plan. Approved chartges shall be noted, signed, dafed and filed by the
Department of Cammunity C?evelopmeni.
2. Notificatiora of a proposed minor amendnrent, and a report af staff actian
of said requesf, shall be provided ta aff property awners wiihirr or
adjacent to fhe speciaf develapment district that may ,be affected by the
amendment. Affected praperties shall be as determrned 6y the
Department of Community Developrrren# Notifir:ations shaN be
postmarked no tater than five (5) d'ays follvwing statf action on the
arnendment request and shalf include a brief staiernent describing ihe
arnenclrrrerrt arad the time and date of when the Planning and
Envfronmental Cvmmissron will be informed of the staff decision. In aIJ
cases the report to il7e Planning and Errvironrnental Commission shall be
made within twenty (20) days frvm the date of the sfaff's decisian on the
requested arrrendment.
3. Appeals of staCf decrsions may be filed by adjacent praperty owvners,
owners of property within the specraf developnaent district, ihe a,pplrcant,
Planning and Environmenial Commissr`orr merrrbers or members of the
Tawn Council as outfined in Sectlon 12-3-3 of this Titlc.
~ Pursuant to Section 12-9A-1 0, Vail Town Code, appeals of staff decisions may be fiied by adjacent
properky awners, owners of property within the special development dsstrict, the applicant„ Planning
and Environmental Gommission merribers or rnembers of the Town Council as autkined in SQCtian
12-3-3 Qf the Town mf VaiO Zoruing Regulataans. Should you have any questians, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 970-479-2148.
Sincerely,
Warren Campbel!
Planner II
Attachments:
A. Reduction of the praposai
8. Memarancium frorra applicant
~ C. List of notified }aropertieslPublic Notice
~
I
~
3
:I j~ ~ u
,
,
. ~ . . . . _ ,
- ~
. _ _1 . . . . 4...~~_ ~ .
r_~
ti_:
_I... &:ap
r~E~:' r,a NF`... - • ~V
or L~2F=eAK
Li.:I~
~ ~ ` il . _ '/-w I~
~~I f' ~ • , f, •
~ t ' i
r,
• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
, _ i, ' - ~IJ'"~ ,
~ . ~~c r,,, 'I•. ' - . f , 'i 'r~ .
j I~ i.. . _ - _ Uhl~ 4~' Y--~-tl•i~ T~ -
~ t~. ~~*n. ~A l i . Y _ - • ~V 21 r c,"S vY,. ~F
~ ,'~J'f:' . . jrt:'.+~;~. ,
..J!_ . ~ +-l_ •rE_ .i;it'~ ~ . ,o •I_. ~ ~
Fl.~.,
~ " , ~ ;i~~-~'~.~,. - - ? C)t
~
,
~ + 11ti v
I ~ 1
4 F'-. j~ r r . L r L• ble-~ati ~J ;%~.ey /5 r~l~~== ,
~'~Z•, ~!_41~'.~_ `ti ~ ~
N u
Ft7~-
I , / 1! • a+~ ~ alM~riSlohls Q iN7Ct~lcr~ ~LEVATIoN~
- ; ~ ~
. ' . .
A-
F
I If .
Attachment: A 0 SC411 e.
, , .
' i
i
John M. Perkins, AlA
MEMd R QNDUM 0047 E. Beaver Creek Blvd.
Ckristie Lodge Resort, 5uite C-16
TO: Town of Vaif P.O. sox 2007
Avon, Colorado 81620
Community Devefopment Deparkment 970.949.4322
~'.0629
FROM: Jafi~n Perkins fax 970.44
;
DATE: June 25, 2002
SUBJEC7:
Request for a minar arnendment to Special Develapmen# DFS#rict No. 6 far
the temporary aperation of a nightciub and restaurant business by Club
Cheisea with respect to conversiQn of defunct lotaby space to additinnal
bar/lounge space.
Appkicant: Judy Alexander, awner
~ Ciub Chelsea
Pfanner: p,llison Qchs
BAGKGRc]UND AND QESCRIPTIC3FJ QF 3HE REQUEST
The ViiEager Restaurant and Bar was remodeied and updated in 1992. It ceased
operation sometime last year and the space on the lower levels of Buildings #3
and #4 (approximately 3,827 Sq. Ft. af restaurant bar and 2,000 Sq. Ft. of
kitchen) have rernained unoccupied and unused to dake. ~
. ~
Ciub Chelsea, a local nightclub since 1997, located in subterranean space an I
upper Bridge Streef, has entered into alease with the Daymer Corporation to ~
lease the above referenced space on a temporary basis until a#ime that the ~
buildings are demolished. ~
The "histaric°" lobby space nf the Vail Vilfage Inn (appraximately 654 sq_ ft.) has
always been open #o the bar and restaurant with a direct 12' wide opening at the
south end, a large stflne two-way fireplace with a 5' wide open fire box in the
center, and a 4'-6" arched heacf openPng on the north end of thre fobby. ~
His#oricalEy, both spaces have praetically functioned as ane. However, under the
current SDD zone district, the space 6abeled "lobby" fafls under cammon space
~ ancl needs to be revised to bar and restaurant. It Fs important to rea[ize that this
space is no IangeE used as a front desk or iobby operation.
Attachment: B ,
ADJACEN7 PRQPERTY OWNERS ASSQCIATIONS ~
ALPINE STANDARD - Parcel # 210107101019
Mr. .1eff Moellentine, President
28 S. Frantage Road
Vail, CC] 81657
HOLIDAY HUUSE - Parcel # 210907101019
Vaii AssoCiates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
l/ail, CC7 81558
St7NNENALPfTALISMAN - Parcel # 210148205009
Richard Genova
P.O. Box 17
Skytop, PA 18357
~
SWlSS CHALET - Parcel # 210108204006
1/R Holdings
P.O. Box T Vail, CO 81658
CRUSS ROADS - Parcel # 210108202023
Trevina LP
6005Ih Ave., 8th Fioor _
- New Yoric, NY i 0020 . - . . _ . - , . . , . . .
' " . - . . . • , r . _ . . 6 . . ' _ . ' _ . ~ . . . . _ ' . ' . .
GATEVIIAY - Parcel # 210108264007
Jaullian & Ca.
13439 Broadway Extensian
Oklahoma Gity, UK 731 14-2202
VAIL VIL.LAGE 1NN
Vail Village Inn, lnc.
100 E. Meadow prive, #33
Vail, CO 81657
~
Attachment: C
t
. . ,-115 ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROF" ZT'Y
PUBLIC NUTICE
~ NOTICE IS HERESY GIVE{W that the Planning and Environmental Gommission Qf the Town of
Vail will hcald a public hearing in accardance with SectioR 12-3-6 af the Municipal Code af the
Tawn 4f Vail on August 12, 2002, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A request for a variance from Section 12-68-6 (5etbacks), Vail Town Code, ta allow far a
garage encroachrnent in #he rear setback, located at 5167 Gore CirclelLot 12, Block 3, Bighorn
5ubdivision 5t" Addition.
ApplicaRt: Rolland S. Harnelin
Planner: Matt Genne#t
. A request for a finaf revieuv and recammendations o# the fol[owing applications related to the
propased redevelopment vf the Vail Mountain Schoal:
1} A request for a recommendation to the Vail Towre Council to rezone 3010 Booth Falls
Road/Lot 11, Bfock 2, Vail Vilfage 12Ih Filing from Two-Family Residential to General
Use;
2) A request for a recammendation ta the Vail Town Council to Zane Lat 12, B]ocEc 2,
Vail Village 12th Filing tv General Use, The northern portion of this lot is zoned
Agriculture Open Space;
3) A request far a recornmencfation to the Vail Town Council ta rezone 7ract C, Block 1,
• Vaii Village 12`h Filirag from Two-Family Residential to General Use;
4} A request for a recammendation ta amend the afficial Town of Vail Land Use Map for
Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12"' Filing fram Low Density Residential to Publicl5emi-
Public;
~ 5) A request for an amendment ta the previausly approvetf develapment plan and a new
conditional use perrnit for a private educationaC institution and an active outdaar
recreation area on 3010 Booth FaICs Road/Lot 11, B1ack 2, Vail Village 12' FiCing and
3160 N. Frantage Road EasU Lot 12, Bloclc 2, VailVillage 12u' Filing;
6) A request far a conditional use permit to allow far the constructivn af eight Type I!i
EHUs located on Yract C, Biock 1, Vail Village 92`h Filing; -
7} A request for a'For a conditionai use permit to allow for ternporary modular classroom
s#ructures located at 3160 N. Frontage Rd. Eastl a part of Lot 12, Black 2, Vail Village
12'' Filing;
8) A reques# f4r a recamrnendation to the Vail Tawn Cauncif ta madify the afficial Town
vi 'J¢ii IZUI:.Rfdll flaL'dfU IYfap 4c, io ie apNivVa u rw iliigeiiiOft iGf 3 160 N. FuGiltage
- . - . n_...n _inr r1!---i . ~ ~ 4 \1,-.•n,.__ •nfh~-ry . .
. .'.i_...+4., i ~ ..,i.J.+e: . . r . _ . _ - .
9) A request for a major subdiuision in accordance with Title 13, Chapter 3, Vail Town
Code, and set#9ng farth details in regards thereto, located at Lots 11 and 12, Bloclc 2, I
Vail Village 12th Filing and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village / Zih Fiiing.
Applican#: Vail Mountain 5chool, represen#ed by 8raun Assaciates, Inc.
Planner: Russ Forrest
A request for a minor amendment to Special Developnment District No. 6, to allow for an expansion
*pplicant: ~f commeresal uses into crmmon area, lacated at 123 S. Frontage Rd. West/Lots M,N„ &O, Vail .
illage 15= Filing.
Cfub Chelsea, represented by JMP Architects Planner: Warren Campbeti
`
Tom 0F l'.A[L ~
1
Planning and Enviranmental Comrnission
ACTIO N FORM
, ,
Department of Community Development
T0~;~;`,~ O~' 1;'d,~IL 75 South Frantage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
kel; 970.479.2139 fax: 470.479.2452
web: www.ci.waiLco.us
Praject Name: TQV 5hops PEC Number: PEC020019
Project Description:
Amendment to a development plan
Participants:
OWNER Town Of Vai! 04/17/2002 Phone: 479-2444
1289 Elkhorn Drive
Vail, CO
81657
License;
APPLICANT Town Clf Vail 04/17/2042 Phone: 479-2444
1289 Elkharn Drive
Vail, CO
81657
License:
~ Project Address: 1309 ELKHORN DR VAIL Location;
Legal Description: Lat: Bfock: Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE BTH. FILIfVG
Pa rcel IV u m aer: 210109200001
Comnnents:
60ARDJSTAFF ACTIQN
Motion By: cahill Ac#ion. APPRQVED
5econd By: hartman
Vote: 6-0 Date af Approval: 08/15/2002
Conditions;
Cand: 8
(PLAN): No changes ta these plans may be made without the written consent af Touvn of
Vail staff and/car the appropriate review commitkee(s).
Cand: CON0005502
1. That prior to submittal for a building permit, the applicaRt submits additional
infarmation regarding erosion control for review and approval so that staFf can
ensure that proper erosian control measures will be taken,
~ Planner: Allison Ochs PEC Fee Paid: $0.00
Planning and Environmentai Cammission
AGTIQN FOR.M
~OWN OF VAIL Department of Commun9ty Devefopment
75 South Frontage ftaatf, VaiE, C.oEorado 81657
te1:970,479.2139 fax:970,473.2452
web: www.ci,vail.co.us
Project Name: Hazard Map Amend. Boath Fall PEC Number: PEC020004
Praject Description:
Amend hazard map from HigM Severity Roclcfall to aockfall Hazard with approved mitigation
Participants:
O1NEVER PRA1f1lDZIlC, STEPtiEN D. 02J01J2002 Rhone:
15965 W ELLSWC}FtTH PL
GQLCJEN CO
80401
Ucense:
APPLICANT PRAWDZIK, S7EPHEN D. 02/01J20(}2 Phone: 303-898-0398
15965 W ELLSUVlOFtTH PL
GULQEN CQ
8oothfalls Homeo+nrners Assoe
Sox 356 Vai{ $0401
LiCense:
Arojcct Address: 3094 BOQTH FALLS GT VAIL E,ocation:
Legal Description: l.ot: Block: 2 Subdivision: BDBTH FALL5 N1TiV HOMES
Parce! Nurriber: 210142302016
Comments: Cornplefe inspection & maint. agreement
BOARD/Si'AFF ACTION
Moteon By: John Schoofiedl Action: APPRdVEp
SeCOnd By: Qoug C.ahill
Yote: 6-0-1 aate af Appravalr 08/30j2002
Conditions:
Cond: 8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail skaff andjor the appro,priate review committee(s).
Planner: FEG Pee Paid; $U.OQ
I Approved 8/26102
PLANMING AND ENVIRt7NIV'IENTAL CQMMISStON
~ PIJBLIC MEEl"iNG MINUTES
Manday, August 12, 2002
PROJECT ORIENTATION Commuraity DeWefopment Dept. PUBLIC UVELCQME 11:30 am
MEMBERS PRESENT MENlBERS ABSENT
John Schofield Chas Bernhardt
Eriekson Shiriey
Doug Cahill
George Lamb
Rpllie ICjesba
Gary Hartman
Site Visits : 12:30 pm
1. East Vail Vllater Tank - 5004 Snowshoe Lane
1. Hamelin resicience - 5167 Gore Circle
2. l/ail Mtn, School - 3160 N_ Frontage Rd. 3. Club Chelsea - 123 S. Frontage Rd.
4. Middle Creek 160 N. Frantage Rd.
Driver: George
~ NQTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner frorn 8:00 - 8:30
Public Hearina - Town Counci1 Chambers 2:00 pm
1. A request far a wariance frarn 5ec#ion 12-68-6 (Se#backs), Vail Town Code, to allow for a ;
garage encroachment in the rear setback, loca#ed at 5167 Gore CirclelLot 12, Block 3, Sighorn
Subdivision Sth Addition.
Applicant: Rolland S. Hame[in
Planner: Matt Gennett
Matt Genneft gave a presentafion per the staff report
Mr. Hamelin stateti that he had no further input.
Gary Hartman had no comment.
Doug Cahill stated that he felt the applicant did afl he could do.
Rollie Kjesbo had no camment,
Gearge Larnb stated that an ILC should occur eardier in the process, such as when the faundativn was
paured,
EricfCSOn Shirley stated tha# he vvoulc7 not vote in approval of fhis varisnee if there wras any pubfic
~ opposition, but seeing as how the appficant did all he could, he will.
~
~o.
a~
~ TOWh' l1F YAIL ~
Approved 8126102
John Schofie4d agreed with Erickson Shirley and felt tha# the guilty party (Surveyor) was not in the rcaom and was not taking responsibility for their error
doug Cah'rll made a rnotion for approval with the findings in the staff memo on page 5. ~
George Lamb seconded the motion.
The mativn passed by a vote af 6-0
~
~
2. A ret{uest for a conditional use permit, to allow for a public u#ility instaAation, located at theEast ~
Vail Water Tank, 5404 Snawshoe LanelSummer Recreatianal Area, Vail Meadaws Filing 1. ~
Applicant; Tawn of Vail
Pianner: Bill Gibson
Bill Gibson presented the staff memarandum.
The appiacant had no presentation.
Rallie Kjesbo asked if #here was a reason the structure couldn't go behind the water tank io hide the
pole tcr a greater extent.
Bab Scott from Motorola, represertting the applicant, explainecE that there was nat acPequate rotam tcr
place the pad adjacent to the existing water tank.
Rollie Kjesbo asked for clarifrcation an whether or not there was a technical prob{em.
The applicant stated that there was no technical problem, but a prablem of inadequate room due to the
~
grade and the existing water tank.
Gecrrge Lamb stated that the trail is heavily used and this will be rather unsightly and wauld be better to
be behind the water tarrk.
Erickson Shirley agreed with the previous comments.
Gary Hartman agreed with the prewious comments.
Daug Gahill asked if the tvwer wsil be removed if the tank were remaved in the future. He also asked if
the technolvgy would be outdated in a period of years. ~
The applicant stated that the s#rueture could go behind the tank, but that adequade tower Yreight would ~
be necessary to obtain the function the tower is propased to achieve. ~
John Schofield discussed [oaking at different iocations for the structure.
George Ruther clarified that with fhis being a conditional use, a canditian could be placed on the
approval.
Dcrug Gahill made a motion to table this ta the September 4, 2002 meeting and to have the data
neeessary to determine the height of the tower, if relacated, and a site specific geologic survey.
Rolaie Kjesba seconded the mo#ion. ~
The motion passed by avate of 6-0.
,
i
2 ~
Apprvved 8/26/02
3. A request for a finai review and recommendations af the following appl'rcatic?ns related to #he
praposed redevelopment of the Vaif Mountain Schoal:
~ i} A request for a recornmendation to the Vail Town Councif to rezone 3010 Baoth Falls
RoadlLot 11, Block 2, Vail Village 12'h Filing from Two-Famrly Residential to General Use;
2} A request for arecommendation to the Vail Town CounciE to rezone a portion of Lot 12, Block
2, Vail Village 12'h Filing from Agriculture & Open 5pace to General Use;
3} A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Cauncif to rezone Tract C, Block 1, Vail
Village 12kh Fiiing fram Two-Family Resiclential to General Use;
4) A request for a recommendation to amend the official Town af Vail Land Use Map for Tract
C, Block 1, Vail Village 12ih Filing from l.aw Density Residential to PubliclSemi-Public;
5) A request for an amendment to the previvusly approved development plan and a new
conditional use permit for a private educational institution and an active autdoor recreatian area
at 3410 Booth Falls RoadlLot 11, Blocic 2, Vaif Village 12 Filing and 3160 N. Frontage Raad
EasU" Lot 12, Block 2, Vaii Village 12t" Filing;
6} A request for a corrditional use permit to allow for #he canstruction of eight Type III EHUs
located at Tract C, Black 1, Vail Village 12th Filing;
7) A request far a canditional use perrrsit to allaw for ternporary modular cfassraom structures
located at 3160 N. Frontage Rd. EasU a park crf Lot 12, BIack 2, Vail Village 12th Filing;
8) A request for a reconnmenda#ion to the Vail Town Council to amend the Officia! Town of Vail
Rockfail Hazard Map to indicate approved mitigation for 3160 N. Frontage Road/Lot 12, Block
2, and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12'" Filling;
9) A request for a final reView of a preliminary plat for a rnajor subdivision in accordance with
Title 13, Chap#er 3, Vail Tawn Code, and setting forkh details in regards #hereto, IoCa#ed at Lofis
11 and 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12Ih F'iling and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Vilaage 12«' Fifing.
Applicant: Vaif Mauntain School, representecE by Braun ,4ssaceates, knc_
Pianner: Russ Forrest
~ Russ Forrest gave a presentatian per the staff report.
John Schofiefd stated that his wife As on the board of trustees, however, he has no econvmic gain fram
any decision and therefore feels he has no conflict af interest.
George Lamb recused himself, as he has been a parent of a student for the past 15 years and is a
neighbor in the immediate area.
Dorninic MaurieCla stated that the staff report accurately reflected the currEnt propcrsaE. He then
exp(ained to the boards changes in the plan. He said the soccer fiead shifted closer to the parking lot #o
pull it away from Booth Falls Raad. He poireted aut a raised crosswalk from the bus stop to #he internal
pedes#rian circulation system ancf said a paved path from the proposed northwest comer has been put
in place. In additign, he said the parking rnaster plan has a statement added that there will be shared
parking agreemenf with the Town, with regards to the proposed nevv parking area and the Boath Falls
trailhead. He said currently the applucant woulti iike to grade the soccer field at the relocated tCatsos
Fianch Road yet #his year and then next year, begin construetion of the eastern partion of the building.
He stated that the applicant would prefer not to construct the pike path along the Frontage Road as a
part of Phase One. He stated that the applicant was willing to proWide whatever guarantee was needed
to appease the concern that the path will be construc#ed.
Erickson Shirley asked if he meant a bond.
Dominic Mauriello stated yes, a bond.
~ Erickson Shirley asked how they would calculate the cos# three years out for the construetion process.
[]nminic Mauriello stated that the TCQ cauld be conditioned on the construetion of #he bike path. He
alsa stated that he believed the Town had a methoclology fpr figuring out band amounts.
~
~
Approved 8/25/02
Gary Hartman asked where construction fencing would go?
Dominic Mauriel'lo stated that he wasn't certain, but that it wQUld be sfightly past the property line to ~
allow for the proposed grading which wilk take place in the right-of-way.
Gary Hartman added that he and several others whers concerned with keeping a safe pedestrian hght-
j of-way along the Frantage Road.
Daminic Mauriello brought up a corrcern with Condition $ regarding a cash deposi# for the remaining
pcarti4n of the bike path. He added that he would like to see a time frarrie for refunding the money if #he I
Tawn does not follow up an construction. He added that he would like ta see a conditian that #he
eastem mast module cauld be moued adjacent to the western existing without cvming pack to the PEC
far a conditional use.
Russ Forrest stated that cash is always nice. He added tha# five years is a typical time frame for
refunding mvney.
A neighbor woman said she saw the schaol growing by leaps and bounds arrd she didn't want to see
Baoth Falls Park arrci tennis court converted to a soccer fieid.
Roass Forrest stated #hat the applicant has requested and received Council approval to proceed through
the proeess ta explore yauth-size soccer fields on Tract A and Booth Creek Rark.
Alan Dansen said he was pleased with the pracess and plan and glad to see the applicant woricing with
the neighborhood.
Roll3e Kjesbo felt that sorne type of temporary bike path needed to be put in and he felt that if a
temporary path was put in as a condition, it cauVd be placed an TCO. He said he felt cash for 100 ~
percent was the optian ta be utilized and paid back in five years.
Erickson Shirfey asked Russ what the Tawn would like to see.
Russ Forrest stated that 125 percent was the norm and is what they would like to see.
Ralfie Kjesba 5tated that he didn°t see the need for 125 percent of the Tract C partion.
Russ Forrest agreed and said that 100 percent was all that would be needed on Tract C por#ion.
Ericlcsan Shirley asked where the bus structure would be plaGed.
Qominic Mauriello sta#ed that the existing bus structure woufd remain ort fhe current side.
Gary Hartman stated that he feit the reason the Cammission suggested moving the bus stop was so
the soccer feld could be shifted and he wondered if shifting the EHUs could be moved ta preserve the ,
Aspens. I
Dominic Nlauriello stated that #hey would need to shift them a great deal and he s#ated that currently
they are set baek into the slape to minirrrize the visual irnpact.
Doug Cahill sta#ed that he comrnended the applicant for ali the work they have done to uvork with the
residents and Tawn, He asked abcau# the hazard berm pratecting the relacated cabin.
Qominic Mauriello stated that a berm was on the plan and height was not listed by the geologist in his ~
first letter.
poug Gahiil aclded that he would fike to see the temporary bike path put En place and stated that a five
4
APPrQVed 8126102
• year bQnding on Tract C was fine and he would attempt to get a c4nditian for moving the modular.
~ Russ Forrest discussed a concern with granting wide open approval of #he modular structure.
John Schofield pointed out that #his plan is not greatly cJi#ferent fram the plan approwed two years aga
and that movemen# of the madule couEd be tied to the final DRB approval. He said he felt the bike path
was in need of same form af temporary existenGe.
John Schofisld called for a five-minute break to consfder the motion.
The meeting reconvened at 3:40 pm.
MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECOMD: Rollie Kjesbo VOTE: 5-0-1 (Lamb recused)
APPROVAL REZQNING 3010 E3{](3T'H FALLSILC)T 91, BL4CK 2, FRUM 2-FAMILY TCJ
GENERAL IJSE W1TH THE FINDlNGS IN THE STAFF MEMORANaUM.
MOTION: Erickson Shirley SEGOND: Rollie Kesbo VOTE: 5-0-1 (Lamb recused)
ARPROVAL REZONING L4T 12, BLUCK 2 FROM AGRfCULTURE flPEN SPACE TO
GENERAL USE W1TH THE FINDlNGS IN THE STAFF MEMORANDUM.
MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECOND; Rollie Kjesbo VC)TE: 5-0-1 (Lamb recused)
APF'ROVAL REZQNING TRACT C FROM 2-FAN11LY TQ GENERAL USE WITH THE
FINDINGS IM THE STAFF MEMORANDUM.
~ M07iON: Erickson Shirley SECrJND; Gary Hartman VOTE:5-0-1(Lam#a recused)
APPRaVAL AMENDING THE HAZA,RQ MAP W1TH THE CRiTERIA ON PAGE 21 {)F THE
STAFF MEMORANaUM.
MOTiON: Erickson Shirley SECOND: Rollie Kjesbo VOTE:5-0-1(Lamb recused)
APPROVAL AMENDING THE OFFICIAL CAtVD USE MAP FdR TRACT C FROM LOW
QENSiTY RESIDENTIALTQ PUBLICISEMI-PUBLiC WITN THE FINDINGS ON PAGE'f2-13
OF THE STAFF AAEMC3RANDUM.
MOTION: Erickson Shirley SEGOND: Gary Hartman VOTE:5-0-1(Lamb recusect)
APPRQVAL DEVELOPMENT RLAN AND COhIDITIUNAL USE PERMIT V111TH THE
FINDINGS ON PAGE 19 AND 7HE CONDITIONS LISTED BELO1N.
MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECJNQ: Doug Gahill VOTE:5-0-1(Lamb recused)
APPR(]V'AL CONDITfONAL USE F'ERiVI1T FOR TY'PE lIC EMRLCDYEE HC?USlNG UNITS
1NlTH THE FINDINGS ON PAGE 19 AND THE C(7NDfTIONS LfSTED BELOW.
MOTION: Doug Cahi11 SECOND: RaPlie Kjesbo VC)TE:5-0-1(Lamb recused)
APPROVAL CONDITIDNAL USE PERMfT FCJR 7HE TEMPDRARY MUDULAR CLASSR04M
~ STRUC7URES WITH THE FfNDINGS fN THE STAFF MEMURANDUM AND THE
CONC71T14NS LISTED BELC)IN.
5
Approved 8126/02
APPROVED COND1TION,AL USES WiYH 13 CaDND1TlONS: 1. The applicant shall provide the Town of Vail with an easement for the
existing public bus stop at the southwest corner of the property prior to ~
building permit submittal.
2. The applicant shall prauide the Town of Vail with drainage easements in
accordance with the proposed grading and drainage plans_ These
easements sha11 be recorded prior to the assuance of a temporary certificate
of occupancy or certificate of accupancy far any praposed development on
the site.
3. Prior to the issuance of a Temparary Certifcate of Occupancy or a Certificate
of Occupancy for any phase of the schoal, the applicant shall complete and
receive a Cer#ificate of Occupancy 4or the eight employee housing units
constructed ora Trac# C except for the occupancy of the cabin.
4. All housing units on Tract C shall be tleed-restricted as Type ll[ empioyee
housing units. These units must be constructed in conjunction with the
approved development plan. Required Type 111 deed-restrictions shall be
recorded by the applicant with the Eagfe County Clerk Recorder prior to the
issuance of any temporary certificate of occupancy or certificafe of
vccupancy for development of the school. 7he employee housing units shall
eomp8y with the minimum requirements far Type III employee housing
regulatians, as defined in Chapter 12, of the Vaif Town Code.
5. The bicyclelpedestrian path shali be eonstructed by the applicant as per the
approved develQpment plan. Construction shall be campleted prior to
receiving a Temporary Certifcate of Qccupancy for phase li of the Schoai ~
which will incfude the food service facilities and gymnasium. If phasing does
not occur on the project then the path shall be completed before occupancy
is granted for the schoaL An easemen# shafl be provided ta the Town of Vail
by the applicant far the bike/pedestrian path prior to the issuance of a
buiEding permit. The applicant must submi# a staging pfan and have #hat plan
approved by the Town of Vail that would allaw pedestrian access acrass the
sate from Katsas Ranch Road ta Bootn Fa91s Raad during aII phases of
construction.
6. The administrator, at his discretion, shall require either a eash deposit, bcand,
ar letter of credit to be submitted to the Town of Vail by the applicant priar to
the issuance of any building permits for 100% of the value of creating a bike
pa#h/pedes#rian trail for the entire length of 7rac# G, Bloek 1, Vail Village 12t"
Filing of the same quality and width as the path specified in candition number
5 above and more specifically described in the Devefopment Plan. If the
Town of Vail does not complete a bicycle trail on this property w6#hin 5 years
I frarn the date of the issuance o# a building permit, #he Town sha11 refund this
deposit.
7. Appraual of the canditional use permi4 for the development plan is
conditianed upon the rezoning of Lots 12 and 17, Block 2, Vail Viflage 92th
Filing to the General Use District and approval of a final plat.
8. The conditional use perrnit for the mociu[ar structures shall be nuil and void ~
twn years fram the spproval of the cdnditional use permit fr r the two madular
structures. This conditional use permit is valid anly for the current number of
rnodular structures as of the date of this approWa9. The applicant can
propose a change in location to the modular struetures and submit a QRB
6
Appraved 8i26102
• application for the new locatian of the madular structures within 8 mortths of
the approval of this conditional use permit.
~ 9. The Vaif Moun#ain Schoal shall not usE any public right of way for parking,
10. A debris flow berm shoufd be designed and constructed priQr the loca#ion of
the cabin on the northem por#ian of iot 12. A qualified engineer or gaologist
shall conciude in awritten letter to the Community Develapment Department
that the berrn will adequately protect the cabin from a debris flow with out
adversely irnpacting private or public property,
11. The appficant shafi verify with a qualifisd lighting experk that luminartce for alf
types of ex'tericar fighting do not exceed 125. The appPican# shall submit a
repart to the 1'awn that the lighting complies with the 7own's develcapment
standards, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certifrcate of Occupancy.
12. The applicant shall submit revised development plans ta the Tawn identifying
adequate snaw storage for the nvrth parking area and the parking area for
Tract C priar to the issuance of final Design Review Board approual.
13. The appficant will move the Bus Shelter to the north side of the bus lane to a
location in accardance with the Public Warks C}epartment. The Bus lane and
shelter shall be maintained throughout construction of the project.
MOTION: Doug Cahill SECOND: Gary Hartman VQTE:5-0-1(Larnb recused)
APPRQVAL F'RELIMINARY PLAT FC}R THE MAJqR SUBDIVISfON W1TH THE FINDINGS
~ C?N PAGE 26-27 IN THE STAFF N1EMORANDUM AND TW4 CONDITIONS:
1. Within one year of the Planning and Enwironmenfal Commission's approval,
the applican# shall submit a final plat tfl the Deparkmen# of Community
aevefopment for review by the Planning and Enviranmental Commissitan.
2. Prior to submitting a finaf plat the applicant shalf address all cQmments of the
reviewing agencies to the satisfaction of the said agencies. Any comrnents
shalP be incorporated into the final plat.
4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Couneil to of an amendment to Sectian 32-
7A-7 (Height), Vai! Town Code, to increase the maximum aliovuabpe taulding height in tfie Public
Accamrnodation Zone Distric#.
Applicant. Boh Lazier, represented by Jay Peterscan
Pianner. George RutherlWarrera Campbell
George Ruther presented an overview of the staff memorandum.
Erickson Shirley asked about the notification requirements of this type of applicati4n.
George Ruther clarified that applicateons of this nature are published in fhe newspaper, but do not
require adjacent property owner notificatian. Gearge Ruther prouided the ofFicial YJV zoning rnap,
autlining al( properties zoned Public Accornmodation Zone aistricts.
40 Jay Petersen, representing Bob Lazier, presented the applicant's proposat.
Ericks4n Shariey asked Jay Peterson for cdarification regarding other projects.
7
Approved 8126f42
Jay Peterson identified ather properties zoned PA and described what renovations had recently been
done and #hat many Qf them exceed the PA maximum height thraugh the use of SDDs. ~
John 5chofield asked for pubfic carriment,
Paul Johnston, Ghristiania, gave an example of the Bridge Street Lodge and the mechanicaE issues,
due to the design of the building. He stated that if you want to build a hotel on a srnall site in today's
ecvnarrty, you are crazy. He stated that fram a function standpoint, additional height woulci nat be
perceived.
Gary Hartman stated that he is encauraged by this application fnr the future of Vail. He would ijke ta
see regulatians wrhich facus on articulation of buikdings and percep#ians from the spaces adjacent. He
belieaes that the PEC needs to la4k at what is a cornfortable floor #o floor ratio. Alsa, how do we
encourage develapers ta continue to put iivable space in roofs to keep the heights lower in percep#ion.
Doug Gahill stated that 48 ft. is a tough height. He stated that 7 ft. ceiling heights is not appropriate for
an upscale hotei product. He stated that roof pitches need ta be incareased, dormers used for additional
head height, etc.
Rallie Kjesbo stafed that hE agreEd with the applicant, regarding ceiling heights. However, he has
concerns about a 5-story building which is a more difficult issue to grasp.
I
Jay Peterson stated that he is still trying to came up with ideas on how to ensure quality buildings. '
George Lamb stated tha# he feels this is a case where frorn the functionality af the building, additivnal
height shauld be balancect with other regulations like se#bacEcs, etc.
Etickson Shirley stated that he feels this appBication flies into the face of the Master Pian. He stated ~
that Vail Village is aunique situation and it is what makes this Town special and he wvuld be against
changing it. He would nat be agairrst adding additional floor heights, but is against adding an additional
floor.
Jay Peterson clarified the flaar to flaor heights and the building height.
Ericksan Shirfey asked about how 9-nuch bulk is on fhe fifth floar. He then asked far the irrtpacts to view
corridors_
John Schofield stated that there are really 3 ways ta rnake this aPplica#ion; SDD, variance, ar code
change. He stated that they haue made ather arrmendments to the PA Zone District, but heightwas one i
they couEdn't agree on in the past. He asked the applicant and s#aff to look at same scort of graduated ~
scale for height, in$tead of an absolute. He asked for comments also from the DRB to help them look j
at this issue. '
Jay Peterson asked for comments from the PEC in regards to pursuing a code change, rrersus an SDD
to increase the height. I
Gary Hartman, Doug Cahill, Rollie Kjesba, George Lamb, Erickson Shirley, and John 5chofield vwere ~
supportive o# a zaning change, instead o# an SaD,
aoug Cahill made a mo#ian to table this until the August 26, 2002 meeting.
George Lamb seconded the motion. ~
The motion passed by a vote of 6-0.
S
AppEOVed 8I28/02
5. A request for afinaE review of a fnal plat for a major subdivision; a reques# for a final review of a
canditionaf use permit to alPaw for a private educatianal institutiarr and developrnent plan
~ approval to construck emplayee hflusing; and setting fQrth details in regards thereto, located af
the site known as LLMountain Bell"/an unplatted p'rece of property, iacated at 160 N. Frontage
Rd,/to be platted as Lot 1, Middle Creek Subdavision.
Applicant: Vail Local Housing Authority, represented by +C7del! Architects
Planner: AIlison +dchs
Aliison Ochs gave a presentation per the staff report.
Mike Goughlin stated that this is the 15m tirne they have been in front of the 6aard and 3(lth public
meeting. He stated that tFte new design is stronger aesthetically.
Otis Gde11 sta#ed that there were iwo entries to the site; ane servicing #he learning center and the other
the hausing projec#. He safd the early learning center is atnrn-story with approximately 4,600 square
feet and a bus stop is included with the proposal. We said the "A" builcfing houses the rental of#ice at
the err#rance near the bus stop and he praceeded to desceibe the remaining buildings in height and
#unction. He said there are storage laokers underground which provicle greater area for residents to
s#ore items. He s#ated that the inspirafion fflr the architecture is a European hill town and continueti
saying that the DRS meeting was very pQSitive and they had several comments abaut the east
e{evation. He said he had some computerized videos perspectives.
Merv Lapin spake to the history and reason far seiecting this site and stated it was a very can#raversial.
He said he had concerns at the time that they were to have na mare than 40 units because of traffic
and the front door protninence of the location. He said this data carne from the early 1990's Cfluncif
and that originally it was thought that emplayers would buy and build #he project fortheir employees, as
~ the Town realized that they couad not prouide all the housing for employees. He said ne was
concerned with doing a commercial project on the site, as Vai! ResQrts gave it to the Town and
concluded that he feEt this proposal for the si#e was too much and he caufianed the Gommission on
approving the proposal.
A 10 minute break was taken to allow the public and oppar€unity to view the renderings and model.
Jirn Lamont wanted peopfe to know why so many people were here tonight. He was told that one
reputable person was foid that this was a NIMBY issue. Jim stafed that this is not a NIMBY issue, A,nd
the second issue is fhat, although he attends multiple public rrreetings, he is no# ihe stirrer of the pot.
He added that speakers should not reiterafe points.
Peter Dracki stated that he has never attended a PEC meeting and stated that this project is a
rnonstrosity and it must be hard for the Commission to make a decFSion. He added that the Vail Daify
had thousands of units for rent at the height of the summer season.
Alan Kasloff statad that he has spaken to many property owners abaut this praject and many oppase
the projectfar different reasans. He stated the Town Vision statement and questioned the need forthe
largest struc#ure in 7own to be located at #he entrance to the Town. He said this project is extremely
cas#!y even with the Town giving the land at minimal rerat.
Erickson Shfrley sta#ed that this Commission cannot stop development on the site and asRced if it is
better to use xhis expensive site to i#s fullest potential, or only put a fev+r uRits can the site. He stated that
they cauld petition Cauncil to choose another lacatian, but they have been given that site by Gouncil to
use as EHU hausing.
~ Alan Koslaff asked why would we put this at Vail's fifth Avenue
Diane Mathias feeEs that the architecture is inappropriate fiar the Town and it should be scaiecE down.
9
Approved 8126/02
George Gillette reaffFrmed 3hat this was not a NlMBY situation but a NITFY {Not in the Tawn Front
Yaec#}. He fsefs that there is a paradigrn ynrhich is working against a rate of return and said it
appears that the Comrnission must accept a corocep# like this because the ecanamics require it He ;
suggested using eight acres out by the public service yard which is awned by Vail Resorts and feels ~
there are ather sites in Town. He asked to see the research data as market research Mas not been
done. He said the Vai! Daily had 300 units for rent today in the newspaper and feels that Vail
Resarts should be cort#acted to see whai their needs are. He brought up the changes in visa
granting caused by Sep#ember 11, 2001 and sta#ed the tragedy has changed the market greatly.
He continued to bring up info about the cost of the uni#s being approximately 50 percent of an
errrplryee's wages.
Ericksan Shirley reiterated that this board does nat make the decisian; it is more a Tavun Cauncil
decision.
Mark Gordon is a resident and property Qwner. He s#ated that most of the people da not speak for
him. He feels that a project like this makes this more o# a community and feels that the resort and ;
community must coexist. He said he feels many in the roam lean towards the resort side of i
Qisneyland being created in Uail and addecf that having 200 peop6e sfl close wauld bring more
people in#n the Village and feees this brings the Town closer to Cammunity.
Jim LarrYOnt stated that the Gommission does have au#hority to control the density.
Julie Esri is a part time resider+t who witl be retiring here in a few years. She said she saw the ~
peoject a few days ago and was shocked by the size in an aeea that had been traditionally green
space. She feels that beyand it being at the entrance, it is the peopie enjoying the mountain that
will be affected as well and feefs #hat all the employee hausirrg does no# need to occur in Vail, as
#here are free buses. ~
Judy Bericowitz is a part time resident of VaiL She stated that the reasan her family came here was -
because of the ambience and green space. They come here ta leave the sky scrapers behind
in New Yvrk and she #eels the essence of this discussiQn is character of the area. She said that no
one is against affordable housing, but #his is na longer affordable. She then read a statement from j
a ietter fram heF neighbor which she believed the Commission already hatf.
Pepi Grammshammer thinks this praject is unbelievably big. He can't believe this proposal and
recommends daing emplayee parking an the site.
Bob Fritch is a residen# and business owner and believes the project is out af control, as it is ugly,
toa big, and tao tall. He said Europeans make mistakes in architecture as well. He has been to
Europe and thought they were ugly there. if Cauncil accepts this it wiCl be against the will ofi the
people.
Gary Hartman started with saying that he is a resident. He felt that the project shou4d be spread out
through the vafley. He said this is segregated architecture, versus integrateti architecture and feels
the density is appropriate. He feels iike cluster hausing is mare appropriate and feels Iike the
development has taken steps in the right direction. He then encauraged the resicients tQ speak with '
Gouncil.
Daug Cahill thanked everyone for comang out speak to the proposai. He said he gathers that most
people in the room are against the praject and asked how far the project is from the roundabout.
Mark Tarral, from Pealc Engineering, responded 500 feet. ~
10
~ Approved 8f26102
Daug Cahill con#inued by asking how wide is a frant door, but agrees that the bulk and mass is too
large.
~ RoWie Kjesbo said he is recentiy new to the Commissian, but he said that they wifi be talking and he
has no further camments.
George Lamb stated tlaat he had previpusly been on the DRB and is new to fhe Commission, but he
is here for the residents, not himself. He said he is upset that at the 12t' hour ail the residen#s
came out. He said he appreciates them ail being here, but they need ta more inuolved. f-ie felt bad
for the develaper to have to go th,rough this now.
ErickSOn Shirley stated that previousdy there were meetings with residen#s in fufl suppart of the
project. He said he isn't trying ta duck his responsibility. The PEC does not have the authority to
sell the land and 6upid a develaprnent dawn vafley. He thanks it is a terribfe waste to put only a few
units on a six million dollar piece of praperty. He is laoking at the praject from a zoning perspective
and encouraged people to uisi# Town Council.
JQhn 5chofield encouraged peaple to keep informed and to talk #o the Council and Housing
Authority and to send comments to Tawn of ltaif staff, He said they added that they have the right
#a appeaf any decision to Town Cauncil.
Doug Cahill rnade a motion to #abie this 'rtem un#iI August 26, 2002.
Rollie Kjesbo seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 6-0.
~ 6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Tvwn Council to amend the donovan Rark Master
Plan and a request for a final revievv of an amendment farthe previously approved development
pfan, to ailow for the cons#ructian of the Donavan Park Pauilian, iocated at 1604 S. Frontage
Rd. 1NestlUnplatted Donovan Park.
AppGcant: Town of Vail, represented by VAg, Ine.
Planner: George Ruther
C;earge Ruther made a presentation per the staff report and clarified that there were 144 spaces on
Si#e, not 143, as in the staff repart.
Ghristie D'Agustino said she is available to answer any question.
Yhere was na pub3ic input.
Rollie Kjesbo feft they addressed the trash enelosure and the other issues and stated that he was in
!n favor.
Gevrge Lamb was in favor.
Doug Cahifl asketi for clarification ora fihe landscaping..
Christie D'Agustino answered the questian.
John Schofield was happy, but said he wauld vote in disapproval, as he still feels there is st6il too much
~ on the site_
George Lamb made a motion of recornrt?endation of approrral to the Tawn Couneil of the amendment
to Donovan Park.
3]
~
Approved 8/26/02
Rollie Kjesb4 seconded the matian.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-1, with Jahn Schofield oppased. ~
7. A request for a minor amendment to Special DeWelopment District No. 6, tv allaw far an
expansion of commerciaf uses into commorr area, located at 123 S. Frontage Rd. WestlLats
M,Al, &O, Vai6 Village 95t Fifing.
Applicant. Club Chelsea, represented by JMP Architects
Planner: Warren Campbelf
Warren Campbell gaue a presentatian per the staff report.
There was no applicant or pubGc comments.
Rollie FCjesba had no comment_
George Lamb said he was cancerned about the noise from Glub Chelsea. Warren Campbell explained that he had been contacted by a iawyer represEnting several of the owners ~
and he added that he woufd reaffirm that the noise shouid be kept to a minirrium and the doors closed ~
ts avaid the loud noise. ~
Daaag Cahill made a arootian to reaffirm staff's approval with the ane candition as faund in the memo, ~
i
Gearge Lamb secanded the motion.
The motion passed by a vate of 6-4.
StafF Approvals ~
VML LLC PEC02-0011 George
Finak review of tawnhouse Plat Review
285 Bridge StreeWail A/iaunfain Lodge, Vail Village 15t Fiiing
Appaicant: VML LLC, represented by Bailey & Peterson
7. Approval of July 22, 2002 rninutes
TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 26, 2002
S. Infarmatian update
7he applications and infarmatian about the proposals are available for pubfic inspection durong regular
office hours irr the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Comrnunity Development
aepartrrtient, 75 Sou#h Frontage Road, Please cafl 479-2138 for in#ormation.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notificafson. Please call 479-2356.
Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Cornmunity Development Department
~
;
~
~
12