HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-0412 PEC
~
. PLANNING AND ENVlRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING
Monday, April 12, 2004
PROJECT {JRiENTATION - Community Development Dept. - PUBLIC WELCOME 11:00 am
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
David Viele
Ann Gunion
BFII Jewitt
Chas Bernhardt
Doug Cahill
George Lamb
Rollie Kjesbo
Si#e Visits :
1. Broer- 2830 Basingdale
2. Slifer - 230 Bridge Street
3. Vail Gateway- 12 Vail Road
4. Snownov+r, LLC- 2388 Garmasch Drive
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break far dinner from 6:00 - 6:30
~ Public Hearina - Town Council Chambers 2.00 pm
1. Swearing in of new Co€nmission Nlembers
2. Appcrintment of Chair and Vice-Chair poug Cahill (Chair) Chas Bernhardt (Vice Chair)
MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Rollie Kjesbo VOTE: 7-0
3, A request for final revievu af a variance pursuant to Section 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town
Gpde, and a variance fram Ghap#er 10, Off-street Parking and Lvading, Vail Town Code, to
allow for required parking to be located wi#hin the public right-of-way, located at 2830
Basingdale Blvd.fLot 5, Block 9, Vail Intermountaen, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applieant: W.L. Broer Construction '
Planner: Matt Gennett
IVIOTION: Rollie Kjesba SECOND: George Lamb V4TE: 7-0
APPROVED WITH THREE GONDITIONS
1. That the applicant submits plans reducing the amount of GRFA currently
proposed witNin the front setback by 50°1o prior ta firnal review of the plans by
the DRB.
2. That the required parking areas and driveways be snow-meited and fabeled as
such on the site plan prior to final review of the plans by the DRB.
3. That the applicant pravides a Ietter from the Public Service Cgmpany
operating the "pump-hause" natural gas pressure-release valve acijacent to
~ the properky that states the proposeci struc#ure is a sufficient distance from
the facility to avoid any heat#h anci safety concerns priar to final review of the
plans by the DRB.
1
.
~
~ Matt Gennett made a presentatian per the staff memorandum. Upon review of the criteria and
findings, staff was recornmending approval af the applica#ian vaith cortditions, as stated in the
staff inemorandum dated Aprif 12, 2004. The applicant's representative, Peter Cape,
addressed the Cammission and stated the need for the variance. The Commission felt that the
requested variance exceeded what is ac+ceptable for new construction. There were serreral
comments regarding the lack af snow st4rage. The CommissiQn members stated that ali
options should be exhausted to reduce the amount of variance requested. The applicant
responded to Commissioner's comments regarding the design afi the house being driuen by
topvgraphy. Thee Commission expressed safety cancerns over the home being so close #o an
existing gas relief valve. There was generai consensus from the Commissioners that the third
and fourth floars of the house shall be pushed back fram the proper#y line and out of the front
setback.
4. A request for a minar exteriar alteration pursuant to Section 12-7B-7, Exterior Alterations or
Modifications, Vail Town Code, ta allow for a comrroercial addi#ion to the Slifer Building, located
at 230 Bridge Street+'Lat B, Bloek 5, Vail Village 15S Filing, and setting forth detaifs in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Slifer Building, LLG
Planner: Warren Campbeli
MUTI4N: Chas Bernharclt SECOND: Gearge Lamb VOTE: 7-0
APPROVED WITH NO CONDITIONS
Warren Campbell made a presentation of the application per the staff memorandurn. Staff was
recamrnending approval af the application ?+vith na conditions. The applicant Inad nothing new to
add to the presetnation. There was no public eomment. The Commissian members
~ expressed their support for the appfication indicating that the application complied with the
applicabfe regulations outlined in the Town's planning documents.
5. A request for a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-1 fi, Condifional Use F'ermits, Vail
Tawn Code, to aAow for a temporary seasvnal structure within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone
district, loeated at 715 West Lionshead GirclelLots 4& 7, Block 1, Vai9 Lionshead 3`" Filing and
Lats C& D, Morcus Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereta.
App9icant: Vai! Corporatian; represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: Warren Campbell
MflTION: Gearge Lamb SECOND: FtolMie Kjesbo VOTE: 6-1 (Jewitt)
APPROVED WITH FIVE CONDITIONS
1. That the applicant shall not erect the teRt prior to April 30, 2044 and that the
applicant shall remove the tent by no later than October 31, 2004.
2. That the haurs of operation shall be frorn 7:00 am to 10:00 pm, seven days a
week,
3. That the applicant's apera#ion of #he temporary seasanai structure comply wi#h
all Town of Vail regulations regarding noise levels.
4. That the applicant install a minimwm of six, 50-gallan plantirrg pots, containing a
combinatifln of evergreen trees and flower p[ants in each pot, in association vsrith
the Alternative 2 seasonal structure lacation.
~ S. Tha# the applicant receives a Town of Vail building permit prior to erecting the
tent.
Warren Campbell made a presentation of the application per the staff inemorandum. Staff was
2
recommending approval of the application with the five conditions as stated in the staff
memarandum. The recommended conditions were similar to #hose required in previous years.
~ The applicant's representative made a brief presenta#ion of the application and requested that
the haurs of operation be arnended to allow the tent to be used until 10:00 pm daily, if needed.
There was na public comment. The Commission members asked questions to clarify their
understanding of the application. Commission member Jewitt questioned the use of the #ent to
address overflow capaci#y and whether the use complied with the regulations as stated in the
Zoning Code.
6. A request for conditional use permit pursuant to Sectifln 12-7E-4, Canditional Uses, Vail Town
Gode, for an amendment to the existing priuate club (i.e. pafking club) conditianal use permit,
located at 12 Vail Road (Vail Gateway)/Lots N & D, Block 5D, Vail Village 1S` Filing, and setting
for de#ails in regard thereta.
Applicant: Vail Gateway Plaza Candominium Association, Inc., represented by Greg Gastineau
Planner; BiII Gibson
MOTII]hl: Rallie Kjesbo SECOND: David Viele VOTE: fi-i (Lamb opposed)
APPR0IIED WITH THREE CONDITIONS: ~
~
1, This conditivnal use permit approval shall be aalid upan the applicant ~
receiving Town of Vail approrral for the associated amendments to the Vaii ;
Gateway Plaza Condominiums plat.
2. The use caf parking club spaces with the Vail Gateway Building shatl be limited
to the parking of motor vehicles and shall not be used ior other forms of
starage.
3. Tandem parking spaces designated for a restaurant use within the Vaii
Gateway Building shall caunt as two required parking spaces when
associated with a valet parking managemen# system; however, tandem
~ parkEng spaces designated for a restaurant use within the Vail Gateway
Building shall oniy count as one required paricing space when operated
without a valet management system.
Bill Gibson made a presentatian per the staff memorandum and recornmended one additional
condition that limited the use af the parking spaces to parking anly. The applicant summarized
the application. There was no public comment. The Commission members asked questions of
the applicant and staff. The Commission members expressed concerns with the applicant's
intent to use tandem spaces for guest parking and restaurant patron parking. The applicant
indicated that up to 20 of the office parking spaces would be shared with the euening-only
restaurant use. Commission member Lamb expressed concerns abaut selling indiviciual
deeded parking spaces in the building and the impact of doing so on future uses af the building.
7. A request for a variance #rom Section 12-21-14, Restrictions In Specific Zones On Excessive
Slopes, Vail Town Cade, to allow for the construction af driveways and surface parking in
excess of 14%a of the total site area, lacated at 2388 Garmisch DrivelLot 9, Block G, Vail Das
Schone 2"d Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Snow Now, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
MOTION: Bill Jewitt SECOND: David Viele VOTE: 7-0
TABLED TO APRiL 26,2004
1Narren Campbell made a presentation per the staff inemorandum. The staff +rvas recornmending
denial of the applicant's request. The applicant, Greg Amsden, provided an overview of the
~ application and why the applicativn has beer, submitted. Norrna Brvden spoke under public
comment. Ms. Broden expressed support af the applicanYs request to build an the properry and
establish easements to clarify the driveway access. The Commission members believed that
establishing easements was the right uvay to address this issue. The Commission members asked
questians of the applicant and staff. The Commission members cammended the appficant for
3
working with the neighbors in an attempt to address the access problem.
8. A reques# far a work session to present an overview of the propased redevelppment plans for the
~ Lionsnead Core Site Hotel, located at 675 Lionslaead Place/(a complete IegaE descriptian of the
proposed development site @s available at the Town of Vail Gommunity Development Department
upon request), and setting for details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Campany
Planner: George Ruther
i
George Ruther made a briefi presentation per the staff inemorandum. The appiicant made a I
presentation and provided an ovenriew of the prapasal. A copy of the applicant's presentation is
avaiiable at the Tawn of Vail Community deveiopmen# Department. Geaff Wright and Jim Lamont
each spoke under public comment. Both expressed their support fvr the redevelopment af Lionshead ~
yet indieated a cautious concern about unintended negative consequences of the redevelopment.
For example, with success aften come the unintended cansequence of increased traffic and the need
t4 manage that outcome. The Commission expressed their generai satisfiaction with concept of the
proposal. A creatiort of a"sense of place" is crucial but the creation of a black hole where peopie
enter but never get out to o#her areas of Lianshead should not be the intent of the redevelapment
project. Instead, this redevelopment praject shauld be the catalyst for the rejuvenatian of ALL of
Lionshead.
N10TIQN: Rallie Kjesbo SECOND: George Larnb VOTE: 7-0
TABLEa TO APRIL 26,2004
9. A request for a recc,mmendation to #he Vail Town Council for the establishment af Special
Devefopment District Na. 38, Manar Vail Lodge, ta allow for the redevelopment of the Manor
Vail Lodge, and a request for a conditional use permit to allow far the construction of Type III
Employee Housing Units, pursuant to Section 12-6H-3, Vail Tawn Code, lacated a# 595 Varf
Valley arivelLots A, B, & C, Vail Village 7th Filing, and setting forth detai[s in regard thereto.
~ Applicant: Manor Vail, represented by MetiCk and Associates
Planner: Warren Campbell
MOTION: Rollie Kjesba SECOND: George Lamb VC3TE: 7-0
TABLECI TO APRfL 26, 2004
10. Report to #he Planning and Enviranmental Commission af an administratiWe action approving a
request for a minar amendment pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Frocedures, Vail
Tawn Code, to allow for an amendment to the Approved Development Plan for Speciaf
Developmerrt District No. 21, Vai6 Gateway, lacated at 12 Vail Road'ILot N& O, Block 5D, Vai{
Village lst Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto, I
Applicant: Vail Gateway Piaza Condominium Assocaation, Inc., represented by Greg Gastineau i
Planner: Bill Gibson I
I
There uvas na public comment.
11. Approval af minu#es: March 2004 and March 22, 2004 I
MC1T1(DN: George Lamb SECOND: Rallie Kiesbo V07'E: 4-0-2
12. Information Update:
Chas Bernhardt and Bill Jewitt will be ahsent from the May 10, 2004 meeting.
13. Adjournment
M4TION; Bill Jewitt SECOND: Chas Bernhardt VOTE: 7-0
The applications and information about the Propasa@s are awailabls far PublEC inspection durin9 re9ular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orien#ativn and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
4
Town of Vail Community Developrnent ?epartrrrent. Please call (970) 479-2138 far additional
information.
~ Sign language interpretatiQn is available upon request wi#h 24-hour notification. Flease ca6i (970)
479-2356, Telephone far the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Camrnunity Development Depar#ment
Publish,ed, April 9, 2004 in the Vail Daily.
~
~
5
.
~ PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSf4N
PLIBL.IC MEETING
Monday, A,pril 12, 2004
PROJECT ORIENTATfC3N - Community Devefapment Dept - PUBLlG WELCOME 17:00 am
MEMBERS PRESEN7 MEMBEF2S ABSEhJT
Site Visits .
1. Broer- 2830 Basingdale
2. Slafer - 230 Bridge Street
3. Vail Gateway- 92 Vail Raad
4_ Snownow, LLC- 2388 Garmisch Drive
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extentis untif 6:00 p.m., the boarcf may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30
Public Hearinq - Town Counci{ Chambers 2:00 pm
1. Swearing in of new Commission Members
2. Appointment of Chair and Vice- Chair
MOTIE}N; SECOND: VOTE:
~ MOTION: SECOND: VD7E:
3. A request for final review of a variance pursuant ta Section 12-6D-6, SetbackS, Vail Town
Code, and a variance from Chapter 10, Off-stree# Parking and Loading, Vail 7own C4de, to
allow for required parking to be located within the public right-of-way, located at 2830
Basingdale BIvd.ILot 5, Block 9, Vail Intermauntain, and setting forth details in regard thereta.
Applicant: W.L. Broer Construction
Planner: Matt Gennett
MOTION: SECOND: V+QTE:
4. A request for a minor exterior aIteration pursuant ta Section 12-713-7, Exterior Alterations vr
Nlodifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for a commercial additian to the Slifer Building, located
at 230 Bridge StreetJLflt B, Block 5, Vail Village 15Y Filing, and set#ing forth details in regard
thereta.
Applicant: Slifer Building, LLC
Planner; Warren Campbelf
MOTIC}N: SECOND: VOTE:
5. A request for a cvnditianaf use permit pursuant to Sectian 12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail
Town Code, t4 aifow for a temporary seasonal structure within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zane
district, 9ocated at 7151Nest Lionshead CirclelLots 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail Lianshead 3rd Fiiing and
Lots C& D, Marcus 5ubdiwcs6on, and setting forth detaals in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Corporatian; represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: Warren Campbell
~ MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
1 -
k1
, lti
r
~
6. A reques# for conditianal use perrnit pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Canefitional Uses, Vail Town
Code, for an amendment to the existing private club (i.e. parking club) conditional use permit, ~
located at 12 Vail Road {Vaii Gateway}/Lots N & 4, Block 5D, Vail Village 1 St Filing, and setting
for details in regard thereto.
Applican#: Vail Ga#eway Plaza Gandominium Associatian, fnc., represented by Greg Gastineau
Planner; Bill Gibson
MOTION: SECOND: VQTE:
7. A reyuest fiar a variance from Section 12-21-14, Res#rictions ln Specifc Zanes C3n Excessive
Slopes, Vail Tawn Cotle, to allaw for the construction vf driveways and surface parking in
excess of 10% of the total site area, located at 2388 Garmisch Drive/Lat 9, Block G, Vail Das
Schane 2"d Filing, and setting forth details in regard there#a.
Applicant: Snaw Naw, LLC
Planner: Vl/arren Campbell
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
8. A request for a work sessivn to present an owerview of the proposed redevelopment plans for the
Lionshead Core Site HQtel, eocated at 675 Lionshead PEace/(a carnplete legal description of the
prapased developmenf site is avai{able at the Town of Vaii Community Develapment Department
upon request), and setting for rietails in regard thereta.
Applicant: Vail Corporation
Pfanrrer: George Ru#her
MOTION: SECOIVD: VOTE:
9. A reqaaest for a rec4mmendateorr to the Vail Town Council for the establishrnent of SpeciaC
aevelopment District IVo. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, to allaw far the redevelQpment af the Manor
Vail Lodge, and a request for a conditianal use permi# ta allow for the constrUCfion of Type lll ~
Employee Housing Units, pursuant to Section 12-6H-3, Vail Tawn Code, located at 5951/aiI
Valley DrivelLats A, B, & C, Vail Village 7th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Manor Vail, represerated by Melick and AssaGiate$
Planner: Warren Campbell
TABLED TQ APRIL 26, 2004
i
10. Report to the Planning and Environmental Comrnission of an administrative ac#ian appraving a
request for a minor amendment pursuant #o Sectian 12-9A-10, Amendrrien# Procedures, Vail
Town Code, to aflow for an amendment to the Approved Develaprnent P1an for Special
Developrrtent District Na. 21, lfail Gateway, located at 12 Vail RoadlLot N& O, Block 5D, Vail
Village 1 st Fi[ing, and setting far#h details in regard there#a,
Applicant: Vail Gateway P{aza Candominium Association, Inc., represented by Greg Gastineau
Planner. Bill Gibson I
11. Appra+ral of minutes: 1111arch 2004 and March 22, 2004
MOTION: SEC4ND: V4TE:
12. Inforrnation Update
13, Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and informa#ion about the proposals are available far public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Departiment, 75 Sauth Frontage Raad. The ~
pub3ic is invited to attend the project vfiientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Gommunity Development Qepartment. PBease cal! (970) 479-2138 for additional
infvrmation.
2 ~
I ~
~
- Sign ianguage in#erpretation is availabie upon request with 24-hour no#ification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Yelephone for the HearEng Impaired, for information.
~ Community Development Deparkment
Published, April 9, 2004 in the Vail Daily.
3 -
1
~
~ MEMORA'NQUM
TO: Planning and Environmentai Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 12, 2004
SUBJECT: A request far fnal review of a variance pursuant to Section 12-6D-6,
Setbacks, Vail fiown Gode, to a01ow for a new primarylsecondary
residence to encroach into the frant and side setbacks and a variance
fram Chapter 10, Off-street Parking and Loading, VaP1 Town Code, to
alEow far required parking to be located within the public right-af-way,
located a# 2830 Basingdale BIvdJLot 5, Black 9, Vail Intermauntain, and
set#ing forth details in regarcC thereto.
Applicant: W.L. Broer Constructian, represented by Peter Cape
Pianner: Ntatt Genne#t
l. SUN@MARY
The aPplican#'s requESt involves the construction of a new twa-family residence within the
front and side setbaclcs of the Two-Family PrtmarylSecondary (PS) residerttial zone district,
~ in addition to iaeating requir€:d parking spaces within the Town of Vail (T01/), Basingdale
Boulevard right-of-way. The proposed structure is to encompass 4,513 square feet of GRFA
and the survEysd laf size of the subject property is 40,463 square feetwith slapes exceeding
30%. The applicant is proposirrg to Iauild wi#hin the front and side setbacks due to the
excessive slope of the lot, the awkward shape of the lot, and the significant stands of mature
trees an the upper partions of the lat. Based Gpon the criteria and findings in Section 4'lll of
this memarandum, staff is recammending approval, with conditions, of the applicant's
variance request.
II. DESCR1PTI0N OF REQUEST
The applicant is requestirtg to build a 4,513 square foot; two-family prirnary/secondary hame
locafed four#een feet (14') into the front se#back and nine feet (9') into the easterly side
setback, with three parking spaces iocated in the TOV right-ot-way (Attachment C). Uf the
4,513 square feet of GRFA, approximately 800 square #eet is proposed to be built within the
frant and side setbackS. Two of the three parking spaces to be loca#ed wi#hin the T4V right-
o'f-way are required spaces far the proposed secondary unit. The applicant has laeated the
proposed resicfence an the subjecf site in a manner that responds to the severe slope of the
property, significant stands of trees, and the awkward shape of the lot itself (Attachmerrt C).
The appEicant's propasaG calks for situating GRF'A in the front and side setbacks on four
different levels of the proposed struc#ure, as depicted on the attached fltaor plans
(Attachment B).
~
1 %1,AIL
TO}~'
~
r
In August of 1972, Lot 5, BIoGk 9, Vail Interm4untain was pPatted' by vartue of the Vail ~
Intermauntain Qeveloprraent Subdevision, Block J, Final Plat,
fn October of 1981, a Design Review Board (DRB) applicatiara was approved for a
prima ry/seconda ry residence wath a total GRFA of 2,5$3 square feet that was never
constructed.
In March af 2004, the app9icant brought a version of the current proposal to the DRB for a
conceptual review.
IV. REVIEV'VING BOARD RQLES
A. The Planning and Errvironmental Comrnission is responsible for ewaluating a
proposal for
1. The relatianship of the requested variance to other existing or patential uses
and structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to vuhich relief feam the striet or literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and uniforrnity of treatment arnong sites in the vicinity, or ta attain the
objeetfves of this Title without grant of special priuiiege.
3. The effect of the requested vaeiance on Isght and air, distribution of
population, transporEation and traffic fiacilatEes, public facilities and utilities, ~
and publie safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the Cornmissian deems applicable to the
proposed variance_
B. The DRB has NO reuiew autlnority on a varianee, but must review any accampanying
QRB application.
C. 7own Council
Activns bf Design Review Board or Plaroning and Enwironmenta) Commissian may be
appeaVed to the Town Council or by the 7own Counci{. Town Gcauneil evalua#es
whether or nest the Pianning and Errv6ronmental Commission or Design Review Board
erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphoEd with modifications, or
overturn the board's decasian.
D. Staff
The staff is responsible for ensur%ng that all submittal requirements are provided and
plans confarm to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. 7he staff
aiso adwises #he applicant as to campliance with the design guidelines.
Staff provides a staff memorandum cantaining backgraund on the property and
prQVides a staff evaluation of the project with respect ta the required eriteraa and
findings, and a reeommendation on approva9, approval with conditions, or deniaf.
Sfaff afso facilitates the review process. ~
2
4
~
~
V. APPICABLE PLAMNING DOCUNMENTS
12-6D-1: PkJRPOSE;
The #wa-family primarylsecandary residerrtial distriet is intended to pravide sites for
single-family residentiai uses or two-family residential uses in which one unit is a iarger
primary residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker aparkment, together with
such public faciiities as may appropriately be located in the same district. The twQ-family
primarylsecondary residential distrrct is intended to ensure adequate light, air, priuacy
and open space for each dwelling, commensura#e with single-family and two-family
occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by
estabfishing appropriate site development standards:
12-6D-6_ SETBACKS:
In the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum frant setback shall be twenty
feet (20'), the minimum side se#back shall be fifteen feet (16), and the minimum rear
setback snali b€: ffteen feet (15'). 12-17-1: PURPOSE:
~ A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: in order to prevent ar tca lessen such practicaf dguibes
and unnecessary physical hardshi,ps inconsisfent with the objectives of this title as
would result frorn strict or literal interpretatian and enforcement, variances fram certain
regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may
result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the lacation of existing structures
thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate +ricinity; ar
fram other physicai limitations, street lacations or conditians in the immediate wicinity.
Cost or inconvenience to the app[icant of striet or literal compaiance with a regusation
shafl not be a reason for granting avariance.
B. Develapment Standards Excepted; Varianees may be granted only with respect to the
dsvelopment standards prescribed for each district, including lot erea and site
dimensions, set}aacks, distances between buildings, height, density control, building bulk
control, site coverage, usable open space, landscaping and site deuefapment, and
parking and loading requirerrients; or with respect to fhe provisions of chapter 11 of this
title, governing physical developrnent on a site.
C. Use Regulations Not Affected: The power to grant variances does not extend to the
use regulations prescribed for each district because the flexibility necessary ta avaid ~
results inconsistent with the objectives of this title is pravided by chapter 16, "Canditional
use Permits", and by section 12-3-7, "Arnendrr7ent" of this title.
Vi. SITE ARiALYSIS
Lat 5, Bioek 9, Vail (ntermountain
s
3
~
~
Lo# Size: 40,463 square feet I(].928 acres ~
Zoning: Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residen#ial (PS)
bazards: Slopes in excess of 30°to
Standard AllowedlRequired Existina Proosed
Setbacks;
Fron#: 20 ft. nla F ft.
Sides; 15 ft_ (east) nla 11 ft.
15 ft. (west) nla 15 ft.
Rear: 15 ft. n/a 145 ft.
Hefght: 33 ft. 0 ft. 33 ft.
GRFA: 6,623 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. 4,513 sq, ft.
Site +Coverage: 6,069 sq. ft. (15%) Q sq ft 2,692 sq- ft- (7°/'0)
Dertsity: 2 DUs per i4t 0 DUs 2 DUs per 40,463 sq. ft.
Landscape Area: 60% (24,27$ sq. ft.) 0 $9°l0 (36,(712 sq. ft-)
Parking: 5{2 enclQSed} 0 6(3 enclosed)
Surroundinq band uses and Zoninq;
Land Use Zoninq ~
North: Residential Two-Family Prirriaryl'SecQndary (PS)
South: Residential T'vua-Family Primary/Secandary (PS)
East: Public Utifity Two-Famify PrimarylSecondary (PS)
West: Residential Two-Family PrimarylSecondary (PS)
VII CRITERIA AND FIMDINGS
A. Consideration o# Factors Reqardin #q he Variances:
°I. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing ar potential
uses and structures in the vieinity.
Staff believes the canfiguration and placement of the praposed new
residence are consisten# with many of the neighboring structures in #hat part
of Intermountain and the Two-Family PrimarylSecondary ResidentiaC Zone
Qisfrict. Mearly all of the lots on tne uphill side af 8asingdale Bcaufeuard, both
vacant and built upon, are very steep and covered with stantls oof mature
trees. There are a significant number of existing residences on Basingdale
Boulevard that exhibit encroachments into the fron# and side setbacks. By
vertue of the fact fhat those residences encroach into the front setback, some
af the required parking must be located within the TC)C right-of-way fior
Basingdale Boulevard. 7hus, the requested variances are in keeping with
existing uses ancf structures, as well as poten#wal uses ancl struc#ures in the
vicinity.
~
4
?
r
~ 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement o# a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment annong sites in the vicinity or
to attain the abjectives of this title wi#haut a grant of special privilege.
Staff believes the request is samewhat excessive with respect tn #he amount
of GRFA and building taulk and mass located within the frvn# setback an four
separate floars. Qther optians exist to repositian the living spaces art the
upper floars of the structure in a manner that reduees the substantial amount
of GRFA in the frQnt setback. While s#aff befieves there is a distinct need for
relief from the strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulations; it is staff's belief that since this as new cons#ruction, there are
many opportunities tp minimize the extent ta which relief is being saught.
The conditions of approval listed in Section IX of this rnernorandum speak to
the other alternatives for a design that decreases the amount of living space
in the front setback.
3. The effect af the reques#ed variance an light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and pu'blic safety.
Giaen the configuration of the proposed structvrs and the stacking of #he
floors in the frant setback, there may be a negative effect on elements suGh
as public facilities, light anti air, that can be avoided with a different design.
~ As can be discerned from the Lower Level Floor Plan (attachment B), there
is arr opportunity to slide some af the GRFA back to rear portiflns of that kevel
wnere #he crawlspaces are currently proposecf. On the Upper Levei Ffoor
Plan (attachment 6), the Bath, Closet, and BedrQOm 4 could all be slid back
aver the area that is fabeled "Open Ta Below", Again, since this is new
constructian, there are apportunities to rninirnize the amount vf GRFA, and
building bufk and mass that must accupy space in the front setback.
Additionally, since there exists today apump house an the adjacent parcel to
the east and the applicant is asking for a variance to encroach into that side
setback which may negatively affect that public utility. The pump house
serves as a"burp vafve" for a natural gas Irne and is approximately ihree feet
(3) from the eastern side praperty line of the applicant's lot. The pump
house preexists the pla#ting of Black 9, Intermountain Subdivision, and is an
established use that serves a distinct public need,
4. Such other factars and criteria as the cammission deems applicable to
the proposed uariance.
The Qesign Review Board (DRB) did a conceptual review of the proposed
structure at its regularly scheduled pub[ie hearing held on March 22, 2004.
While the DRB did not have any factual camments based on a complete set
of plans, as it was only a conceptual reawew, they did Eike the general
architec#ural design and character of the proposed structure
B- The Pianning and Environmentafl Commission shall make the folRowinq finclinqs
~
5
~
~
before arantinq a variance: ~
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special ~
privifege inconsistent with the limitations on ather properties classified in the
same distriGt.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, or rna#erially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted far one or more of the foilowing reasons:
a. The strict literaf interpretatean or enfarcement af the specified
regulatian wouild result in practical difficuifiy ar unnecessary physica4
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this ti#le.
b. There are exceptions or e3ctraordinary circumstances or conditians
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally
ta other properties in the same zone.
c, The strict interpreta#aon or enfarcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant af privileges enjayed by the owners of
oiher properties in the same district.
Viil. STAFF RECOMMEIVOATIQN ~
The Community aevelopment Qepartment eecommends approval, with conditians af the
requested variances, subjeci to the criteria outlined in Section V af this memorandurn and
the following findings:
1, That the granting of #he variance will not consti#ute a grant af special priuilege
inconsistent with the vimitafions on ather prDperties classified in #he same district.
2. That the granting of the uaeiance will not be detrimental tv the public health, safety or
welfare, ar materially injurious to properties or impravements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the follovving reasons: ~
a. The s#rict literal interpretatiorr ar enfarcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical difficulty or Unnecessary physical hardshop
inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. 7here are exceAtians or e7ctraordinar}r circumstances ar canditions applicable
to the same site af the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same zane.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyecf by the awners of other properties
in the same district. ~
6
~
~
~ Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choase to deny the vaciance request,
the foklowing findirags and conditians must be made:
1. That the strict, (iteral interpretation or enforcement of the setback regufation does not
result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship incansistent with fhe
development objectives af the Town Code ar the Primary/Secondary Residential
Zane District.
2. That the strict inteEpre#ation ar enforcement of the specified regulatian would no#
deprive the applicani af privileges enjoyed by the owners of ather properties in
the same district.
3. That the requested variance deviates from the peovisions of #he Primary/Secondary
Residential Zone District regulations more than is necessary to aehieve a prac#jcal
solution to the applicant's objectives.
4. There are na exceptions nar extraordinary circumstances ar canditions appficakrle to
the site that do nat apply generaUy to other properties in the sarne zane. ;
5- That the granting of the variance wouldbe detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare, or materially injurious tv properties ar improvements in the vicinity.
Conditions:
~ 1. That the applicant submit revised plans reducing the 800 square feet of GRFA
currentiy proposed within the iront and side setbaeks by 400 square feet priQrto final
review by the DRB.
fX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vieinity Map
B. Reduced Architectural Floor Plans
C. Reduced Site Pfan
D. Public Notice
E. Applicant's Request
~
~
7
i
Attachment: A
R:B. Y T-r , .
s~.C , ~11 "nk~, Y y~a'tis ~ ~ %-Ilwi ~ ~ ~3. ~ ' : i ~.~s{ k ~ { v r~`~ ~ ~ ~ ' 'P~~ t" s
m
"r~. ~~4~a +~'Ry t ~ si a ~ ~a a as. ~
~ ~ ' P ~ ' ; i: ;
s
~v3
" y { ~g~y, i °j ~O
~ C
4i4q~4,~r Ql~ i . ~I c
~ . j >
~ ~m? ° i - Aw 9
- -,w t4'" w ' x ~~'r;. : m
ay,~ ;r~~ ! _A m+~3 ~ ~ ° ; re k ~ ~ a ~ €
'-~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?~.e;"~"~ ~,4~~r m
a a~7°`,
r' ^aa~ d . y ` ~„g ~~,•r ~,x ? s '~~u - r t > : t r~ ~ ~ % 11. t'~ . 3 ' Y' t.,_ S.~ . i y K' . x a t L
~4~ . ~ A-1 € ~ ~i }l l. A7f 1 ~f ` 1S d ey~ r ~~,'y t''T 'ca.1
6 - Y- s 5E '~01-1
~r h ~ ~ ' ' a ~
~ ! ~ ~ - r ~~'k. "r - c
:r`s r ~`3 a~~~` f ~ ~ c
- ~ , ~ ~ 'S t... ~s . r 4 ~ „ s':
{-r
~ g ~ . „ q 9
11.1 'i } fr: `~~r~~J , r ~ : X~~~i s i~~^"..3~ ~ , s- . r ~ .$t ' ` l~e.,,.,r r ~ ;
r' ~ ~ ' ~ ra ; ~ y5~t d : 2' L k`~ : 4 . R 'Y ; 1 !Z,s.'~ s7 ;
i ~ . y , " ~ ; ~ "l,ee,~ ",T "i+t ~
r - ~,f p ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~°'~'~°'+q"'-'`r~' A
9
c-
f ~ r t x k .~~9~ j #3
..~,a, ' ~ Y Y „~;:1~;~.,i'~sV-ai`.. ~ ~ ,s Y ~ik `Y iy~ `o
J .e 11
~k . . ~ , . • ° A S~ +
_ dr,~ " ~ ~ ~ s"' 7'' t £C~ x,~~.t~: y~ ~ ~x~ ~ ~y.~ . , ~
Yd . ~ads. ~ ~ k.( s~g'~ #~.,.Y . '"'e 14..,~,W'`f ~yj~~ Y9M^~L ~£"a~R ~
h c .~k' ~d L ~ ~ V , k8& ~ ~
~ i 'f 1'C R 'cn° # . . ~ t F G . f Y • 1 7 ~ 1 .
~ k ~ A"` 3,.'s `i d q{ ~ ?Vi V'1 I , . i~ - { ~ ~ ' 2 ~ ~an x . ^ H
3
I
~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ "'t ~d+~ ,~s S r = f ~ ~ I
ps `"k~Ab~ r + Fq x; i ~`f ` ~ 'a
y t ls + ~'~t~ ~ a 6 ? ~r~ r # . a
r„ x ' . € . t 1. 1M va t m
~ .r{ ~~v. ~t . k ~ a ~ ~ . a ss`~ r -r a ~a x ~
~ R ~ ~~m a . k~, ~ iu~3 ` ~~a -Y' q~``~~',~ t~ ~ 4 r r y f ~s -5`z-x , .krt~k~ r. + s 4 z ~ m
~P ~ ~ t~ r~ Yy.~~ ~ ~ ~3 i a ~ ~ i . h
- ~~w..2 R y„~5 y ~ L a~M !~~'r Y~C+~ ' ~ S '
~
rp~ a~ ~ IF ~ 3~~, ~1.`~~~. ,~o~t.. ~F 1 a
p Y ,J~ ~l t'+~ 5;e~v~ .e~°'~'r3'" Fi~t r<, _ i
' s: - r~,~ ~ ~ ° ',.~T ° a
",.ke .t y~ t ~ ..3. ~ .A . ~ ~Sn m
Cl `,g 3
rtI ; ~ $"i
' 0 Y` m
" ~ " ~ ~
x' ~ 1 Y,~.~ c~4 ~e. ~~3ffe ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~1 a,~. ~`~='Ii .
~ r p~ ~ ii .J~ ..w .4°c . Ji , t
F ~r 3 ~ ' y.. Fs; < e ~{F
' . d ~:r ~ ~
q, y. r3j ~ Iy ,~.tyr s
a y. w: ~Y-.~ '
~ m
p .
.j a ~ ' . S"r7u x r +~u } . ~ 11 ~ 'h i ~ ~ ~ ,~~r~ i~-?s i ~r~ ~~I ~ 4i~r~ 1~ :I ~~n5~~ 1. ~
t i~c ~ ~ , u ~ ~ ~'~`c ~ ~~~'~rf ,;w"4W l . ° .0, ~ E ~ . 4 g r'.~°~'we ~ Ix ~V ; . Rd~ ~
r.9, " ~ ~ ~ , . m ~L w ~z.~,`,i ~5 . „ a ii~ir ~ , y~ ~„a a ~ t y y
- ~ ' ~
~l~..~,"i . k w'~ ro~"~- ak,~~~ - a ~ . . ~s` ~ ? ~
Va'~ ~rw -nr~y` - e, s F" t i
f s , +ys.# " ; r~ ~ 3 ~w 4 ~ ~ ~ 1! ~
y~' , a }
~r€ Y y,~ G~,~~
~ ~ ~ ' ~ f " ~.rr-`~ ' ~ - 3 ~ I i '~u ~ ~ °
p
a ~ ~~3 ~a . ~ =x a `sy~ S ~qep ~ a N~'~d~ r ? . 9 7 m
,a ~ ~ ~ ~ V i3~ 'S C x `d't~~~`~g " , { ~ ~ r ~v yry n 9
, .
~ 6 'v t i~l ~ 1 ~ ~ F ' ; y r3 ~ .
~ , ' g ~,Y - P ~ k~4` ~a 5~s ~~K~6V g : ~ P ~ E < ~ ~ f ~sll
F ~ ~ ~ A{~
s~ v ~'rF'.~; t ro
y * Z'~r~:[ w~..Y ~ . `~,~y-`' ~yx'r..Lytay~yn' `v. +k X ~ d ~
T t A ~ A Y r{ `%a"~ . Jx~Y~ ~ { id~ ~ ~ 9 ~ .
~ ~ ° ,~J..W d rl..+} _ ~t . y.~ na~~
x a~i A' k. ~ Y '4 ~ ` iS e ~ ~ s t ~ ,~~k,~m II ~I;U F ~rx~ ~
. ' ' ~ i " r
l . : ySa ~ C q x . - s- a ~ ,r~r a y , z wo.~F ~'~c:' ~ ~ t
'~d'L. x m, 'a~ ~i r ~a o s .,4a~' 's ,ns' . .
's~ ~ ,Y~.-.. i 1 _ r'i ' 's . ~ ~ ..'e"}~'~ "1y a'~y~~'~M.~ _
Z n {
ii ~ x ~c. ~ ~ t 3~ " - , . s~"~~~ I~ ~ M k m`
~E Tn ~ E .~w. ~ ' ; ti . ~a~y~y~U? R r ep ~ f? >
'~,e S}g ~ " ,`A: 1 . ~f ~ k~ ` ~a y+- I", ~ m~
I~ ~~s,r~ ~ j ."r,~'"~- ~r . Ry Y~ . r -E H y~r~yr~ d ~
~ I~ 1 r r . -t% ~ $ ~ ~a. ~~es ~ ~i ~K
q ~ 1 ~'~3.'. ~~i ~ Nwn ~ ~ ~ y{ ~
9 ~ ~a-`-. s$~ 4Z *5 x` 's~ 'hr~,~ ' a.Y
;i j 5 S ' , i ~us ~i ~ . ~y5
0 - ~ . ~ °i .
r' ~rp 'R
t h ~
S . r y~, ryy ~ 7~4~R.~r' I` ~ '
~ tP * ~l ~+Sx C. .
4CY . t7~ ~~~1 ~ . T~ ::t ~ ~ y • . t -
{ . y 11 . Y°" . Y ~ tL4, ] ~ $
~ ; P ~Re oa
b~ ~ ~
y., ~ k~,~'Y dY 1~ ~ 1"~ .~S
7
~ j ~ y ~ . ~k +~.F'~' ;~'.~`x ' ~ ~ ~j~f~~.~ 3 .
'a a;. ~ F' ~ P,~ . rc° `~t, ~fi ~ ~ Tf ef -„I ~~7~.
„ ~ ~ i ~}y ~ ~
~ae~.„. { r ~R„,w~- ' i~`~}' ~ 3 u~~b.u 3~~ . 2 ~P° e `,t~~-~ ~ n.
p° ~ £ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~y,~ 1 t , y ,„~f~aaJ~'~~'~ ~I~,, ^ ~7~A nal~- 7+ ` ~g.?.v `+"F r ~5°FP'% a.. ~
. : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~
~ ~ 214, ~ a ' 6.~"~`~ 2 ,u~r~ i'~ ~ tw' ~Yh ,r ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~"~~~n.k`
q i v ,S a u. 3 .b ~ ~ i .
~ ,;,~p ,,g, ~S ~ ~ v ~t''~ a % y 1 ~.~~ast e'ti"~ y , 4 ~`"a"~ s ~b ,a~ <i
~av ~ ~ Y ~ ~i ~ `^x# ~k` .cw,~1`x5k"~ h ~ n.~ ~,Ja^r,~ > ~ y ~4.~~ag ~ ~ . . s . `"4~ ~ ~k~,,,°~~ ~ ~ F A a ? ; ; ? ~ ' a ~ ° ~ ~
. , ~ ~ i `7t~A~ ~ xi ~ $4 e,s~ 1 I ~ ~~~f ~ i y~""ra~'e a~P3 ~ . ~ r~ i~ ; : F tr~ ~r ~ xi~ i
~a : y
T.ae^c 'L.~, g 1 ' q~. + ~d' ? k t I 6 . ~ , Spa ` ~ , . N w ~ ~w~ :
- ; I
. ~ i° . . .+~i~` *4 ~'~E' " ~ '1 ~4 y . R. ^ ss~ ~e .
~
~ ,r..~' - ~~a ra t = s .~,-r~'~' '~^'n ;'~4w~' ~x ^
q '`a "S
i i `M... ~
Y (
'aA
~ '4.~ . R ~ +
k ~
d d ~
r
, wv ~e. ~ ~ Y ~~~~r' ~,tf;
, ~~`S
'fr ~jfy W.
. ~"34 x. k l. 1~ , F,~ #rt+ jp
11
. a F" c .r ' . ~I 3^r ~i 1. ~ iu~ " a~.~~'f ; P ~F ; _
, .
^-3a'. ~~y"'°~L 'M;vt ~.r, 1 „ ~ Z.~a., _ ~ ,em4. w ro-
,
, Y ~~f'11Y''-Tk~ u? a~ s.,';. ~ A~' , -ti. :~.r."1, , 4 ~.:i. . . ~s't,`::: Y ~ .~5?~: s-~'.
I
Attachment: B
;
~
I
~ I
~ R~ . ~
0
N M. s a~l i 1 I ~ ~i
1
~7 ~
~
.
~
~
~
S ~
_ / -\J A M. j
'N
_ az 1
° z I
a `
c ~
rn - - -
r
ro
~
za' a'
I
~
P A,
: E ~•,0_ 24.3,
P 00
Z W
a ~ d
m ~
` !n
ci
4
n b
r
!
I
.
-n r
r- p
' Q s
, o r~
;Y7
e'
. r rn
1 C a6'~Y
~ m - - -
r
~~o" ~4'~_0' I~s~'
~ _ ~ ~
~ p -
~
o
~ p ~
- ' - ~ I
~
~ ~
0
I ~ P
I Gy ~ ~
C Y ~
j ti I Z. `
6 a c; ~ '
io o i - t tr
i
~ ! - ~ n
T~
r
~
i ~ ~p I~
i~ J ' is:
9 ~ ` i~~~' - - I~.
- - i s ~n f
- ~ ~ ~ E ~
I ° r ~ ~
~x p ~ . ~ I
~ ~
I a
I ~ ,
_ - - ~ .
~ ~ ~ ?i ;
e - i
~U ~ ' O ~ ~
{p L ~ N
_ _ ' ~ . ~ m
~P ~ ~
~
I~ I- ~~r - I zy __..._i . . _ _ _ ~
I ~ia ~m
` , ~T 2]~0 ~a
1 ~ i I
. ~ 3_0~ ~ 190_
I -
I ~
^I~ ~
wN
LJ
~
a D
E ( !1
~
GJ
~
?
r ~
in I
~ 6
i !
• I
~
I
i
m o z R
R :ro I
- r ~
~ ~ ~
- - - I I LE
~d
i x
I ° ' ~ i i
~
~
m - I
CJ ~
Q
Ir ~ ~ II
r
p
z =
k
~
_ ~ . '
z ~
- n -
I6 ~ ~ T .U
I ~ -
r
t c^' ~ I
I
~
h
I - j 9
K , N
Y ~
L (,J
C7 ~
Z
L ci
n O
?
r
m
1
I
9
i
~
_ - Q
~
i -
i
I I ` ~
~ i
__________~__'i
1
I I
1 i
I
I
I
I I ~
I ~ .
fl - I
, -
--r- -
~ ~ -
a r '
~ t I
1
I 1 I I
I I t
- ,
- . ,
I ~
~ I I
i'---- i
- -
p
[ ~p
C
' Tro ~
~ ~ ~
I - ~ U
~ a r
m
n ~
A ~
a~
~
~
II
f
~
~
i
~,~,~~Y`;,1~
'
: p
~ R ~
J1 r
~
> rn ,
r ' 1 ~ -
~ a ~ .
v~ ~ s _ t'_.--.~
O rf'~ ~ ~4~ _ I 11
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
i ~ ~
y,~ J .
t.' L~~ ; I
~ ~ I
; - ~
~ ~ - - "
~ ~ , ~
1 ,P- ~ ~
s
~ 1! < _ ~ ' -
i ` , ° _ i
~ ; i
- ~ ~ - -
, ~
' ~
~ > ` ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ m
~ ~
, _ a
~ ~
, m ~
~ - b ,
i ~ ~
i~"` 1 .l-.~'-.. ~
i ~ ~
I ---y;, :s ) - " i
~ t . fJ ~,r. ~
~ Kk ~
~
1
l
~ , ~
Py g~
~ ~
r
6,
0
~ ` n µ p
~
~ 1 a
~ ~ ~ 11
~ „
~ ~ ,
4 @
U~
~
i
i
i
n
I
~ E .
1 ~
Y ~ f
~I r7
-
~ I - ~_0.~_
- - ~ r~
? ~i ~ ~
Lli e
f r j^~
r = ~ c
r ~y r d ~ =i~
r~~. E t~~ ~ t ~ • :
ti( Y • <
L
_1-
Y
Z . Z 'k• ' ' ~ , .
~ i
~ n
r
m
~ ° ~
i
~
~R
~ i
~
e~
I 5 I
~r+
ca. A1.
` O
ri Z b
~ rn
- r~ _ -
- - IV +
- ,Y
~ I f
- - I
_ _ ~
i
/ .
_ _ . r,
- ~
- _ ~-i
-
~ I
I,~I
rP
o O ! i
z G')
n O
~
rn
r a
~
~d !
I; ra ~
~
{
-
,
~
~
~ r {y
! C ` i
71
S"
q j xS,~, 4 v, _
C~ ,t(4
I rv~
~ - •
i
-
.i
9
,
~
~
~
~
~
Attachment: C
~
~
df
1
i
i
LP
~
`
• r
- , D
, o
Ln
n
n
~
rn
v
r-
Z ? b
g -
y ~ k
\
~
p ~ ~A h~~,.., r ~
Fx
(V
r
ra Y p
a ~ \ 0 \ J
~ ~ ~~c{' • ~ . f'~Q. ~ A~;
~
\ ~ ~ ~Y 1 pJ
nj o !qf`y ~ ~ m~
m ~
`tl^` ~~~•rF~j
~SK= q a ~¢#k l ~
1 - i
~ ~ ` . - - - - : r s s ~1 i
i
I ~146
11 ~rJ i $ $ ~ F P II &
m g i . > F Y a g i
4 g i
i
i
i
~Q
.
I ~ ~ ~ . T . . . . T. XAr 1
I ' . . . . . . _ h
s~
Y c e I
1 . . . FFAI.
~
\ f ' I
a~ s s s Feaee. xi ' I
g "t ~ ~
a i ~ % 1 ~ ` i age:`a ~d~ ? ~ XT;
? D m ~ ~ ~ 1 ez~ s~~ 4~R • ~p a ~ ~ s~
R
s F - se f 4 &~SS
~
4
'
Z "
Ct J` A . ~,~9 P.
p < ~ o `ae , _ Y t1 - p a i d pi at
y
o -Zi J OT f ~\`L lv~%ly, •'"^k~. ~ %t~ ~S
t] 1
~
Attachmen#: D
~ .
TNIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YlUR PRitERT1' TOWN OF VA I
PUBLIG NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GfVEN that the Planning and Environmen#al Commissian of the Town af ~
Vail will ho1d a Public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6, Vail Tawn Code, crn April 12,
2004, at 2:00 PIVI in the Town of Vail Municipal Bui4ding, in consideration mf;
A request for final review of a variance pursuant to 5ection 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
to allow for a new prirnarylsecondary TesidencE to encroach irrto the fron# and side setbacks and
a variance from Chapter 10, Qff-street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to allaw for
required parking to be loca#ed within the publac righ#-of-way, [ocated at 2834 Basingdale
BEvdJLot 5, Biock 9, Vail !n#errnountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. A
Applicant: W.L. Broer Construction
P4anner: Matt Genneft
A request for a minor exterior alteration pursuant to Section 12-713-7, Exteriar Alterations or
Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for a comrnerciai adcfition ta the Slifer Buiiding, Iocated
at 230 Bridge Street/Lot B, Block 5, Vail Village 1" Filing, arrd set#ing forth details in regard
thereto.
AppEicant: Slifer Buiiding, LLC
Pianner: INarren Campbel!
~ A request for a conditional use permit pursuan# to Section 12-16, Conditionaf Use Perrnits, Vail
Tawn Code, to allow for a temporary seasonal structure within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone
district, located at 715 INest Lionshead Circle/La#s 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail L.ionshead 3nd Filing and
Lots C& D, Morcus Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Carporation; represented by Maurielb Planning Group
Planner: Warren Campbell
A request for canditional use permit pursuant to 5ection 12-7E-4, GanditionaC uses, Vail Town
Code, far an amendrnenf to #he existing private club (i.e. parking club) cnnditional use permit,
located at 12 Vail Raad (llaif Gateway)ILots N& CJ, Block 5D, Vail Vil[age 1Si Filing, and setfing
for details in regard thefeto.
AppCicant: Vail Gateway Plaza Condomonium Associa#ion, Inc., represented by Greg
Gastineau
P{anner: QiIC Gibson A request for a variance from Sectian 12-21-14, F2estrictians In Specific Zpnes Un Exeessive
Slapes, Vail Town Cade, to aflow for the construct9on of driaeways and surface parking in excess
of 10% af the total site area, lacated at 2388 Garrnisch Drive/Lat 9, Block G, Vail Das 5chone
2"d Filing, ancf setting forth tietails in regard thereto.
Applicant: Snaw Now, LLC
Planner. Warren Campbell
A request for a wvrEc sessian to present an overview of the proposed redevelopment plans far the
Lionshead Care Site Hotel, located at 675 Lionshead Place/(a compfe#e fegal description of the
~ proposed develapment site is availabie a# the Town of Vail Community Development Department upon
request), and setting for de#ails in regard thereto.
Appficant; Vail Corporation
Pianner: George Ruther
The appiications and infarmation abaut the proposals are available fivr public inspection during regulaf
A#tachmente E
~ VAN DIEMEN INC
Peter A. Cope
General Contractor
P.O. Box 1832, Vail, Calorado 8I65$ 970-479-9530
Cell 970-390-2106
Fax 970-479-0759
I am rcquesting a vaniance on Lot 5 Block 9 Basingdale Boulevard. It would enable
the livEng spaces to be puiled out ovcr the garages, which accupy the area within the frant
setback. The lot line is 20 feet back from the road edge. At this point there is already a
signit'icant elevation difFerentiation. Due to thc topQgraphy, granting this variance would
give agreat deal of relief on the impaet the building wouid have on the lot. As is stands
the lat is basically a greenbelt that extends to Larkspur Court anci backs onto the hames
thal occ;upy the lower side of Snowberry Drive. Allowing the new censtruction to start
~ 24-25 feet from ihe road frantage leaves the maxianum area of the heavily wooded lot
untouched.
In respcanse to the Criteria and Findings porCian oF the Variance application I would
1ike to enumerate each of the factors requested.
1.) The rcIatianship of the requested variance to other structures; Tk~iis black is located
across thc street From the Camelot Townhomes. The impact will be nonexistenC to these
residences, a.s their main living arca is located on the norkhern side af the building with
only parking on the south side directly off the road. To the west is 2840 Basingdale
Boulevard. The impact of the variance on this property is also negligible as tive rnaintain
the desire tc, either replant ar avoid disturbing as much of the plant life in between their
structure and our proposed structure.
The pumphanse property to the east of L.at 5 will experience zero impact, as the side
set backs will remain standard.
2.} The closest neighbor to the Iot in question is 2$4(} Basingdale Boulevard. This home
has a garage with living spaee aboue within 20 Feet of the road. I do not lc.riow if a
vanance was necessary in this instance. However, kQ achieve uniform treatment and
eompatibility csf their site and ours, a variance must be obtained in our insCance.
3.) Thc granting of this wariance will have negligible irnpact on light or air. As to
distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities once again it has very
~ little impact. This is a primaryl secondary residence that will not produce a capac;idy
of additional traffic that the current neighboncood cannot handle. A sirnilar space to
~
G
compare is the upper portian of Alpine F]rive where residences occupy bath the vpper ~
and lower sides Uf the read. In particular 1798 and 1808 Alpine Drive bath have
living space ciirectly above the garage space, which fall within 20-25 feet of the road
edge. In both these sites, negative effeets do not seem apparent nor would lhey be on
the site in question. Nor do I berieve public facilities, utilities ar public safety would
be comgrarzaiscd. PartieularIy on the issue of utilities, since they begin at the road
edge impact is k;ept to a minirnum. I cannat site any negative attributes relating to the
requested configuration.
"I'he granttng af this variance does not constitute special privilege, as it is consistent
with other similarly classified properties in this district. There are a few similarly
classified properties I can sit.e.
1.) 2840 Basingdale Boulevard- this property suffers from a similar tapography. The
current structure has living space above a garage that sits appraximately 2(} feet
fram the roadside. This home has no histary of detrirnent to public safcty or
welfare or to any properties value in the area.
2.} 1798 Alpine Drive- This Chalet style home also resides apgrUximately 20 feet
from the roadside with living space above the garage. Once again this is a
practical application of the variance we request due to sirnilar conditions. ~
3.} 1808 Alpine Drive- The circumstances of this home are also of similar physical
hardship resolved by utilizing the floor abave the garage as living space. Once
again, I can find no proof oF neighboring residences suffering adverse injury.
As to the public safcty, health, welfare or negakive impact bn grogerty in the vicinity
being affected by this variance approval: I find that keeping green belts of old growth
trees to be nolhing but advantageous. Allowing as many of the naturally seeded plants
and trees ta remain (especialIy on a steep incline) does nothing but improve the lives of
all in the areea in many ways. Far exarnple, air quality is improved, soil erosion is
minimized and sound and unnatural light is filtered.
I hope I have pravided insight that might assist you in your consideration of this
matter. My observations of consequences of decisivns in similar applicatians logically
led me ta believe this variance is the suitable conclusion. If I ean supplement or aid in
any way as you weigh judgement simply cantact me for direct respanse.
~
Peter A. Cape
~ MEMORANaUM
TQ: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 12, 2004
SUBJECT: A request for a minor ex'teriar alteration pursuant to Sectian 12-7B-7, Exterior
A9terations or Nlodifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for a cQrr7mercial addiiian
to the Slifer Building, located at 230 Bridge StreeULot B, Block 5, Vail Village 1$'
Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Appfieant: RotRney E. Slifer
Alanner: Warren Campbela
I, SUMM,4RY
The applicant, Rodney E. Slifer, is reqtaesting a minor exteriar aiteration pursuant ta Sectien
12-78-7, Exterior Alteratians ar Madifocations, VaiG Tawn Cade, to a61ow for a corrimercia9
store front addi#ican #o the 51ifer Building, located at 230 Sridge Street/Lot B, BEock 5-C, Vail
Viflage 1" Fifing. Per the Commercial Core I zvne district the applicartt is applying far a minor
~ exterior alteration ta aBlaw for the enclosure of an archatectural "notch" in #he west fagade of
the Slifer BuiCding and install an awning which extends out over the praposed entry. 5#aff is
recammending appreval of the requested minor exterior alteration subject ta the findings
noted in Section IX of this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTION QF REQUEST
This minor ex#eriar afteration requsst is to aNow for the enclosure of an architectural "notch"
in the west fagade of the Slifer Building so that it might becorne interior retail space and the
addition of an awning over the relocated entrance. A vicinity map depicting the lacation of
the Slifer Building in Vaii Village is at#ached for reference (attachment A). The proposed
enclosure measures 4 feet wide by 4 feet 4 inches deep for a total of 17.32 square feet. The
proposal is to relocate the existing entry anci enclose a portion of the existing "notch" in the
fagade and install an awning over the new entry. Reduced copies caf the proposal are
attached for reference which depicts the area to be enclosed (attachment B). A leiter from
the applicant datetl March 9, 2004, is attached for reference.
III. BACKGROUND
• This praperty is a part of the original Town of Uail which became effective by the
election of August 23, 1966, and the court order of August 26, 1966_
• fJn February 24, 1992, the Planning and Enviroremental Cornmission approved a
~ major exterior alteration and a site coverage variance request for the Slifer Building.
The 1992 praposal added approximately 57 sq. ft. of site couerage to the Slifer
Bu6lding, in order to allow far the construciion of approximately 53 sq. ft, of additional
first floor retail area, and 548 sq. ft. of new o#fice space on the seeond floor af the
i
building, above the retail space. The 1992 site coverage variance approval at9owed ~
the applicant to increass the existing site coverage by 1.8°to, from 92.1 °lo to 93_9%o.
The Planning and EnvironmentaC Gommission approved the applicant's site coverage variance requESt, finding that the proposal was in compfiance with the
Variance Criteria and Findings prescribed in the Municipaf Code_ TMae PEC also
found that the sirict literal interpretation or enforcement of the site coverage
regulation would result in a practicaf difficulty, as the site coverage regulation is
inconsisten# with the gaals and objectives outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan
and Urban Design Considerati4ns.
• Qn April 13, 1998 the Planning and Environrnental Comrnission approUed a major
exterior aateration and a site coUerage uariance, tQ allovu for a remadel and
expansion to the Sli#er Building. That propasal added approximately 160 sq. ft. of
new retaii #loor area to the lower level ofi the existing building, removed a tota[ of 9
sq. ft. of real estate office floor area from the rnain level (Bridge Street) of the
buifding, and added 135 sq. ft. of new offMCe floor area to the upper le+rel of the
building. The prnposaf increased the total site coverage by 103 sq. ft. for a total of
3,129 sq. ft (97.1 The "notch" was introduced to the design in order to reduce the
amaunt of deviation required by the applicant for increased site caverage and to
cornply witn Design Review Baard guidelines.
+ Qn h/larch 3, 2004, the Design Review Board (DRB) conducted a conceptual review
of the proposed exteriar alteration to the Slifer Building. In that meeting the DRB
cammented on the awning, the moving of Yhe front doar, and the enclasure of the
"natch". The Board ?rras fine with the movement of the door, but there was some
eoncern about a one-faot wide awning over the nevw window which is proposed ta
replace the existing door. Qn the Board there was general agreement that the ~
"notch" could be enclosed and still maintain the sense and feel which was created by
the building on the streef. However, two members believed that the praposal as
presenied was acceptable and the remaining two befieved it shou6d be enclosed by
approximately two feet.
~ On March 2004, the Plannsng and Environmental Commi.ssion approved a
variance for this property #fl have 97.4% site coverage.
~ Qn March 17, 2004, the DRB dirECted staff to staff apprave the project if the step
back of the "notch" uvas increased by six inches far a total step back of one-foot from
the adjacent fagade whECh wifl cantain the new entry door.
IV. ROLES OF REVEEWIMG BODIES
The PEG is responsible for evaluatinq a pmposaf for:
Aetian: The PEG' rs responsible for final approval/denral of a minor exterior alteratioR.
The PEC shall review the proposal for:
- Conformance with development standards of zone district
- Lat area-
- Setbacks
- Building Height
- Density
- GRFA
- Site coverage ~
- Landscape area
- Parking and fQad'ong
- GQmPliance with the goals and requ6rements of the Vail Village Master
Plan, the Streetscape Master Plan, and the Vail Comprehensive Plan
~ - Compliance with the Vail Viliage Urban Design Guide Pian and Vail
Vil4age Design Considerations with respect t4 the following:
- Pedestrianization •
- Vehicular penetratEOn
- Streetscape framework
- Street enclosure
- 5treet edge
- Building height
- Views
- Serv6ceJdelivery
~
- SunJshade analysis
- The PEC's approval "shalt constitute appraval of the basic farm and
loca#ion of improvements including siting, building setbacks, height,
building bulk and mass, site improvements and fandscaping."
Ileggn Review Baard:
Action: The DR;B has N(? review authority on a Major or Minor ExteriorAlteration, buf
mu.st review any accompanying DRB applieation,
7he DFiB is responsible for e+raluating ihe proposal for:
- Arc'hitectural compatibility with other struetures, the land and surrQUndings
- Fitting buildings into Iandscape
- Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the
topography
- Removal/Preservatian of trees and native vegefatian
~ - Adequate provisian for snow storage an-site
- Acceptabifity of building rnaterials and calors
- Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms
- Provision of Iandscape and drainage
- Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures
- Circukation and access to a site including parking, and site distances
- Locatinn and design af sateliite dishes
- Provision of outdoor lighting
- Compfiance with the Vail Village Urbart design Guide Plan and design
cansicierations ~
Staft:
The staff is responsible for ensuring that aII submittal requirements are pravided and
plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zaning Regulations, The staff alsa
advises the applicant as #o compliance with the design guideliraes.
Staff pravides a s#aff memo containing background on the property and pravides a staff
evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a
recommendation on appraval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also faciiitates
the reWiew process.
Town Gouncil:
Actions af DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town CauncM] ar by the Town Council.
Town Council eualuaTes whether or not the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denEals
~ and can uphold, uphofd with modifications, or overturn the baard's decisian.
~
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMEN7S Coning Regulations
Section 12-78 CQmmercial Care 1(CC1) bistricf (in part)
12-713-1: PURPOSE:
The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique
charac#er of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of ladges and cammercial
establishments in a predorninantly pedestrian environment. 7he Commercial Care 1 District
is intended tp ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the
permitted types of buildings and uses. The District regulations in accordance with the Vail
, Viflage Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe site development
standards that are intended to errsure the maintenance and preservaticsn of the tightly
clustered arrangements o# buildings fronting on pedestrianways and pubfic greenways, and
to ensure continuation of the bui6ding scale arrd architectural qualities that distinguash the
Village.
12-78-7: EXTERIOR ALTERATIDNS C3R MODIFeCAT1C)NS:
A. Subject To Review: The cQnstruction of a new building, the alteration of an existing
building which adcfs or removes any enclosed floor area, #he afteration of an existing building
which modifies exterior rooflines, the replacerrrent of an existing building, the addition of a ~
new outdoor dining deck or the modificatian of an existing outdoor dining deck shall be
, sub}ect to review by the Planning and Enviranmental Camrrussian (PEC) as folkaws:
1 . Application: An application shall be made by the owner of the building ar the building
owner's autharized agent or representative on a form provided by the Administrator.
Any application for cQndorniniumized buifdings shail br authorized by the
condominiurri association in conformity with alf pertinent requirements of the
candominium association's declarations.
2. Application Conten#s: An application for an exterior altera#ion shall include the
following:
a. A completed applicatian farm, fiGing fee, and a list of all owners of property
located adjacent to the subject parcel. A filing fee shall not be collected for any
exterior alteration which is only for #he addition of an exterior dining deck;
hawEver, all other applicable fees shall be required. The owner's list shafl incfude
the names of all owners, their mailing address, a legal description of the property
owned by each, and a general description of the property (including the name of
the property, if applicable), and the name and maifing address of the
condominburn assaciation's representative (if applicable). Said narnes and
addresses shall be obtained frQm the current tax recards of Eagle Caunty as they
appeared not more than thirty (30) days prior ta the applicatian submittal date.
~
b. A written statement describing the proposal and haw the propasal complies wi#h ~
the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and #he Vail Village Urban Qesign
I Consideratians, the Vail Village Master Plan, Streetscape Master Plan, and any
oiher reievant sections of the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
c. A survey stamped by a iicensed surveyor indicating existing canditions orr the
~ property including the location of impravements, topography, and natural features.
d. A current title repori to verify ownership, easements, and ather encumbrances, -
including schedules A and B1.
e. Existing and proposed site plan at a scale of ans inch equals ten feet, (1 10°), a
uicinity plan at an appropria#e scaae ta adequateEy show the prDject location in
reVatianship ta the surrounding area, a landscape plan at a scafe of one inch
equals ten feet (1" = 10), a roof heEght p9an, and existing and propased building
elevations at a minimum scale of one-eighth inch equals Qne faot (1/$" _V). The
material listed abave shall include adjacent buildings and improuements as
necessary to demanstrate the praject's compliance with urban design criteria as
set farth ira the VaiE Village Urban Design Guide Plan, Vail Village Qesign
Considerations, the Vail Vil{age Master Plan, the Streetscape Master Plan, and
any ather relevant sec#ians af the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
f. Sun/shade analysis of the existing and proposed building for the spring/fael
equinox (March 211September 23) and winter solstice (December 21 ) at ten
o'clock (i D:04) A.M. and two o'clock (2:00) P.M., unless the Department Of
Gommunity Development of the Town determines that the praposed additian has
no impac# on the existing sun/shade pattern. The following sun angle shall be
used when preparing this anakysis:
SpringfFali Equinox Sun Angle
1 a:(}Q A.M. 40° east af south, 50° declination
2;00 P.M. 42° west of south, 50° declination
Winter Solstice Sun Angle
~ 10:00 A.M. 30° east of south, 200 dec9ination
2:00 P.M. 30° west of south, 20° declination
g. Existing and proposed floar plans at a scale of one-fourth inch equals one foot
(1/4" = 1') and asquare footage analysis of all existing and proposed uses.
h. An architectural or massing model of the proposed deveiopment. Said modef
shall include kauildings and major site improvements on adjacent properties as
deemed necessary by the Administrator. 7he scale of the model shall be as
determined by the Administrator.
i. Phota averlays andfor other graphic material to dernonstrate the refationship of the
propased development to adjacent properties, public spaces, and adopted wiews
per Chapter 22 of this Title.
j_ Any additional infarmatEOn ar material as deemed necessary by the Adminis#rator
ar the Town Pianning and Environmental Gommissian (PEC). The Administratar
or the Planning and Environmental Commission may, at hislher or their discretion,
waive Gertain submittal requirernents if it is determined that the requirements are
not relevant to the proposed develapment nor applicable ta the urban design
criteria, as set forth in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Vail Village
Des4gn Considerations and any other relevarot sections of the Vail Camprehensive
Plan.
~ 3. Application Date Ane£ Procedures2: Cornpiete applications for rnajor exterior
alterations shali be submitted biannually can or befare tFOe fourth Monday ofi February
or the fourth Monday of September. Submittal requirements shall include all
informatian listed in subsection A2 of this Section; provicied, however, that the
architectural ar massing madel shall be submitted no later than three (3) weeks pri4r
~
- ~
to the first farrnal public hearing of the Planning and Environmental Commission. No ~
public hear'rngs or work sessions shall kae scheduled regardinQ exterior alterations
prior to tne biannual submittal date deatflines. At the next regularly scheduled Planning and Environmental Commissian meeting following the submittal dates listed
abave, the pdministra#or shall inform the Planning and Environmental Commission of
all exterior alxeration submittals. The Administra#or shall commencE with the review
of exteriar alierations following th6s initial Planning and Environmental Gommissian
meeting.
a. A property owner may apPly for a major exterior alteration (greater than 100
square feei) in any year during which he or she shall submit an application on the
February or September dates as set farth in subsectian A3 of thus SectiQn. Said
appiication shall lae termed a"major exteriar aitsration°'.
b. IVotwithstanding the faregoing, applications for the alteration of an existirag
buiiding which adds or remaves any enclosed floor area of not more than one
hundred (100) square feet, applications to after the exterior rao#iines of an
existing buifding, applicatians for new outdoor dining decks and applieations fos'
modifications to existing dining decks rnay be submittee# an a designated
subrnittal date for any regulariy scheduleti f'lanning and Environmental
Commission meeting_ 5aid applacaticans shall be termed a"minor exterEOr
alteration". The review procedures for a mirrar exterior alxeration shall be as
outlined Mn ihis Sectian. A[I eroclosed floor area for an expansion or deletion
pursuant to this subsection A3b shall be physically and structurally part of an
existing or new building and shall no# be a freestanding structure. ~
c. Asingle praperty oa+rner may submit an exterior alteration proposal whieh
removes or enclosES floor area of one hundred (1(}0) square feet or less on a
designated sGbmitfal date and v+rill be rewiewed by the Planning and
Environrnentaf Commission at any of its regularfy schedulsd meetings.
5. Hearing: The public hearing before the Planning and EnWiranmental Carrzmission
shall be held in accordance with Sectian 12-3-6 of ihis Title. The Planning and
Environmental Cmmmission may apprave the application as submitted, approve the
application with Gonditions or modificatioras, or deny the application. The decisian of
the Planning and Environmental Comm6ssion may be appealed to the Town Council
in accordance with Section 12-3-3 of this Title.
fi. Compliance With Corrzprehensive Applicable E'fans: !t shall be the burden of the
appiicant to prove by a preponclerance of the evidence before the Planning and
Environmenial Commission that t[ne proposed exterior alteration is in compiiance
uuidh the purpases of the CC1 District as specified in Section 12-78-1 of this Ar#icle;
that dhe proposal is eonsistent with applicable eCements of the Vail Village Nlaster
PCan, the Town of Vail Streetscape Masier Plan, and the Vail Comprehensive Plan;
and that the propvsal daes not atnerwise negatively alter the character of the
neighborhood. Further, that the proposal substantially cornplies with the Vail Village
Urban Design Guide Pfan and the Vaii Village Desogn Considerations, to include, but
nat be limited to, the foflowing urban design corrsiderations: pedestrianization,
vehicular penetratian, streetscape framework, street enclosure, street edge: building
height, views, serviceldelivery and sun/shade analysis; and that ihe proposal +
substantially complies with all ather eiements of the Vail com+prehensive plan.
7. Appraval: ApprovaE of an exterior alteration under subsections A5 and A6 of this
section shall constitute approval of the basic farm and location o# improvements
~ including siting, buiNding setbacks, height, building bulk and mass, site impravements
and landscap9ng,
Lapse Of Appraval: Appraval o# a majar or m6nor exterior alteratian as prescribed by
this chapter shafl lapse and became void two (2) years fol9owing the date of approval
nf the rryaJor or minor exterior alteration by the planning and enwironmental °
commission un9ess, prFOr to the expiratian, a building permit is issued anti
construction is commenced and diligently pufsued to campletion.
9. Design Review Baard Fieview: Any modification or change ta the exterior facade af a
building or to a site within the CC1 district shall be reviewed by the design review
baard in accardance with chapter 11 o# this title.
° B. Compliance Burden; {t shalf be the burc{en ofi the applicant to prove by apreponderanee
of the evidence befare the design revieuv baard that the proposed building modifacation is
in compPiance with the purposes of the CC1 district as speci#ied in section 12-713-1 of
this article; that the proposal substar+tialfy complies +n+ith fYre Vail village design
considerations, and that the proposal does not otherwise alter the character Qf the
neighbarhood.
12-76-20: VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DES3GN PLAN:
A. Acioptian: The 1fai6 viiEage urban design guide plan and design considerations are
adopted for the purposes of maintaining and preserrring the chaaracter and vitality caf the
Vail vil4age (CC1) and to guide fhe future ahteratiQn, change and improvemeni ict CC1
~ district. Copies of the Uail vilNage design guide plan and design considerations shall be
on file in tfie department of community development,
Vail Village Master Pian
Yhe Vail Village Master Plan is based on ihe premise that the Village can be planned and
des6gned as a whole. The Vaii Village Master Plan is inlended ta be consisteroi with the Vail
Village 1Jrban Design Guide Plan, and along with the Guide Pfan, it underscores the
irriportance of the relationship between the built enviconment and public spaces.
Furtherrnore, the Master Plan provic3es a clearly stated set of goals and Qbjectaves autlining
how the Village wilE grow in the future.
Gaals for Vail Village are sumrr3arized in six major gaal statements. While there is a certain
amount of averlap betr,veen these six goaBs, each focuses on a particular aspect of the
Village and the communidy as a whale. A series of objectives outline specific s4eps that can
be taken toward achieving each staied goal. Policy staternents have been developed to
gu%de the Town's decision-making in achieving each of the stated objectives.
The stated gaafs of ihe Vail Village Master Plan which pertain to this application are inclutied
En SectiQn VIIf of this memorandum, Cri#eria and Findings.
Vail Village Urban Qesign P1an
This Guide Plan represents collective ideas about functional and aesthetic ob9ectives for Vai!
~ Village. diagrammatic in nature, the Guide F'lan as intended to suggest the natuee afi
improvements desired. It is based on a number of urban desigro criteria determined to be
appropriate for guiding change in the VaiiVilfage. 3he Guide plan is intended ta be a guide
for curreni planning in both the public and private sectors. The pertiner+t portions af the Vail
Village Urban Design Plart are include in Section VIII of ihis memorandum, Criteria and
0
Findings. ~
VI. ZONING QNALYSIS
Zoning: Comrnercial Core 1 District
Land Use Plan Designatian: Village Master Plan
Current Land lJse: Mixed Use
Development Standard Allowed/Required Existinq Proposed
Lot Area: 5,000 sq. #t. 3,223 sq, ft, no change
Setbacks:
Front: Per Vail Viiiage 1 ft. no change
Sides: Urban Design 0 ft.JO ft. no change
Rear: Guidelines 0 ft. no change
Building Height: 60% at 33 ft. or Iess 100% at 33 ft. or Jess no change
40% at 33 ft. to 43 ft. 0°Jo at 33 ft. to 43 ft. no change
Site Coverage; 2,578 sq. ft. (80%) 3,129 sq. ft. (97.1%a) 3,139.8 sq. ft. (97.4%)
Landscape Area: Per the Vaif Village 51.5 sq. ft. no change
Urban Design Guide
Plan ~
Parking: per Section 12-10-10 per Section 12-10-10 .04 space (2.3
spacesl1,000
square feet)
VII. SURRDUNDING LANd USES AND ZUNING
Land Use Zoninq
North: Mixed Use Commercial Core 1 District
Sauth: Mixed Use Comrroercial Care 1 District
East: Dpen Space Outdaor Recreation District
INest: IUlixed Use Commercial Care 1 District
VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Cmmpliance with #he Commercial Core I Zone District Purpose Statement
According to the Official Town of Vail ZQning Map, the applicant's praperty os located in the
Commercial Core I Zone District (CC1). Pursuant to Section 12-78-1 of the Municipal
Code, the purpose of the CC1 Zone District is intended ta, ,
"provicie sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Villags Commercial ~
Area, with its mixfure of lodges and commercial establishments in a predaminantly
pedestrian environment. The Gommercial Core I[7istrict is intended to ensure
adequate light, air, apen space, and other amenities, appropriate to the permitted
types Qf buildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail
~ Viflage Urban aesign Guide Pian and Design Considerations prescrbe site
development stancEards that are iniended tc) ensure the maintenance and
preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting an pedestrian ways and publac greenways, and to ensure cantinuation of the buifding scale and
architecturai quaiities that distinguish the Village."
Staff Response:
Staff be6ieves that the propased improvements are in compliance with the intent of the
purpose section of the Cammercial Core 1 ZQne District.
B. Gompliance with #he Urban Desiqn Guide Plan for Vail Villaqe
Staff Response:
There are no specitic sub-area concepts in the Urban Design Guide Plan for Vail Village
reievant to this propasaf.
C. Compli:ance wi#h the Urban aesign Considerations for Vail Village and Exterior
Alteration Criteria
The Urban L}esign Considerations for Vail Vi14age are intended to guide growth and change
in ways that wilV enhance and preserve the esserrtial qualities of Vail Village. The Urban
~ Qesign Considerations are divided 'unto twQ major eategQraes: Urban aesign Consederations,
ancf Architecture/Larodscape Gonsiderations. TMe fallowing design eansiderations are critical
elemen3s of the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and provide the criteria to evaluate
new proposals:
Urban Desigra Considerations
The Vail ViElage Urban Design Considerations are primarily the punriew af the Plaraning and
Environmental Cornmission.
1. Pedestriarrizatian:
~
The proposed minor exierior alteration will have no negative impact on the
pedestrian circulation within Vail Village_ The proposed addition will add
visual interest ta Bric#ge Street and irnprove customer access into the Slifer
Building.
2. Vehieular Penetration:
Vehicular penetratian and circulation will remain unchanged, as a result of
this praposal.
~ 3, Streetscape Framework:
5treetscape framework identifies two alternatives for impraving the
pedestrian experience in the Village. These include the development af
open space, including landscaping along pedestrian routes, and the infill
devefopment of commercial storefronts alang pedestrian routes. ~
Landscaping saftens the building edges and provides a colorful accent, while
commercial infill pravides additional street-le+rel activity and uisual irrterest for pedestrians. Upan review af the applicanYs praposal, staff believes that the
minor exterior alteratinn will contribute pasitively to the overall pedestrian
experience along Bridge Street. Staf# feels the proposed facade
improvements will enhance the averall appearance of the Village,
4. Street Enclosure:
The purpase of this design cansideration is to ensure that a comfortable
relationship between the width of the street, and the height of tne building, is
maintaineti. The praposed addition will result in a slight decrease in the
width nf the street at the first level of the buiCding only. Currentfy, Bridge
Street is approximately 25 feet wide in front of the Slifer Building. Staff
belie+res that a camfartab{e relatianship will be maintained be#ween the width
of the street, and the height af the building, upon the completion of the
propased minor exterior altsration.
5. Street Edge:
The design consMderations encourage that a strong, yet irregufar street edge
be created a{ong pedestrian streets. An irregular street edge bcings variety
and visual interest ta the pedestrian experience. In response #o the concerns ~
expressed by the Design Review Board durPng the worksession meeting, the
applicarat has made minor revisions to the plans and introduced greater
articulation to the Bridge Street facade. Staff believes the irregular building
line of the proposed minor exterior alteration adds visual interest ancf will
haue no nega#ive impacts on the Bridge Street edge.
6. Building Height:
There is no prcaposed change to the buifding height. Staff believes the
existing building height is appropriate for this site and does not believe the
propasal will have any negative impacts on the area,
7. Views and Facal Points:
The proposed expansion does not affect any adopted or proposed Town of
Vail view earridors, nor does it negatively impact any focal paints in the
Village.
8. Service and Delivery:
The proposed minor exterior alteration wiil not negatively impact current
service and delivery patterns. ~
~
ArchitecturallLandscape Cvnsiclerations
The ArchitecturaI/Landscape Corrskderatians are reviewed primarily by the Design Review
Board.
1. Roofs
The praposed addition of a copper standing searrr roof abave the prmposed
"natch" enclosure wila have positove impaets oro the appearance of the Bridge
Street facade. .
2. Facades
Staff believes that the proposed changes to the Bridge Street facade wilf
enhanee the visual interest af the building and add variety to the pedestrian
experience alang Bridge Street.
3. Ba3conies
There are no balconEes proposed as a part af this applica#ion
~ 4. Decks and Patios
No decks or patios are proposed.
5. Accen# Elements
To provide additionai accent and v9sual Nnterest ta the building, the applicant
is propos9ng to instafl a avvngng over the new entry which has an atypical
design whieh rrvilf differentia#e this entry form others an Bridge Street.
6. Landscape Elements
There is currently wery lit#le landscaping on the applicanYs property. The
applicant is ntat propvsing to add or remove any landscaping with this
proposal.
Staff Respanse:
Staff believes the proposal is bn compliance wuith the Urban Design Gansiderations far Vaif
VilCage.
D. Campliance with the Vail Land Use Plan
~ Zhe foilowing goaCs of the VaCl Land Use F'lan are applicabfe to thts proposed altera#ion:
1.1 Vail should continue to grow 6n a con#ralled environment, maintairoing a
balance between residential, comrnercial and recreational uses ta serve bo4h ~
the visitor and the permanent resident.
1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever
possible.
1.4 The ariginal theme of the old Village core shauld be carried into new
development in the Village core thraugh continued implementatiQn af the
Urban Design Guide Plan.
1.12 Uail shouid accommodate most of the additional growtn in existing developed
I areas (infill areas).
3.4 Commercial growth should be concentrated in existing commercial areas ta
acGOmmodate both local and visitor needs.
Staff Response:
Siaffi believes that this proposal is consistent with the Vail Land Use Plan.
E. Compliance wi#h the Vail Villaae Master Ptan Gaals
The Vail Village Master P1an is intended to guide the 7own in developing land use laws and ~
policies for coordinating development by the public and private sectors in Vail Village and in
imp9ementing cdmmunity gaals for public impravements. Further, the Master Plan 15
intentEed ta serve as a guide to the staff, review boards and Town Council 'rn analyzing future
proposals for development in Vail Village and in legislating effecfive ardinances to cleal with
the such developrnent. Contained within the Vail Village Master Plan are goals for
development in Vail Village. Tne goals are surnmarized in six rnajor gQal statements. The
goaf statements are designed to establash a frarnework, or direction, for the future growth of
the Village.
A series af objectiwes outlone specific steps toward achieving each s#ated goal_ Policy
statements have been develaped to guide the Town's decisian-making in achieving each of
the stated objectivQS, whether it be through the review of private sector development
praposais, or in implementing capital irnprovement projects.
Goal #7 Encourage high quality redevelopment whi[e preserving the unique
architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of
community and i+dentity.
1.2 Obiective: Encourage the upgrading and redeWeiopment of residential
and commercial faciflties.
1.3 Obiective: Enhartce nEw development and redevelopment through
public improvements done by private developers working in .
cooperataon with the Town.
1.3.1 Policv: Public improvements shall be developed with the
partic9pa#ion of the private sector workeng with the
Town, _
~ Goal #2 Ta fioster a strang tourist industry and promate year-roeand ecc,narnic
health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole.
2.1 Objective: Recognize the variety of land uses found 'en the 10 sub-areas
throughout the Village and allow for development ihat is
compatible with ihese estabfished Cand use patterns.
2.2 Obiective: Recognize the "historic" commercial care as the main aCtivity
center of the Village.
2.2.1 Polic : The design criteria in the Vail Village Design Guide
Plan shall be the primary guiding dacument to
preserve the existing architectural scale and
character of the core area of Vail Village.
2.4 Objective: Eneourage the develapment o# a variety af new cammercial activity
where cvmpatible with existing land uses,
2.4.1 PoGc : Cornmercial infill development, consistent with
es#ablished horizontal zoning regulations shafl be
encouraged #o provide activity generators, accessible
green spaces, pub9ic pfazas, and streetscape
improvements to the pedestrian network throughout
~ the Village.
2.5 C}biective: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and ~
maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to
better serve the needs of aur guests.
2.5.2 Policy: The Town wilE use the maximum flexibility possible in
the interpre#ation of building and fire codes in orderto
facilitate building renovations withaut crmpromising
life, health and safety considerations.
Goal #3 Ta recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking
experience thraughaut the Village.
3.1_ Qbiective: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by
landscaping and other impravements.
3.1.1 Policv: PrEVate development projects shall incorporate
streetscape improvements (such as paver treatments,
landscaping, Iighting and seating areas), along
, adjacent pedestrian ways.
~ 3.1.3 Policy: Flowers, trees, water features and other landseaping
shall be encauraged througnout the Town in locations
adjacent to, or visible from, public areas. ~
Goal #6 To insure the continued improWement af the vital operational elements
of the Village.
6.2 Obiective: Provide for the safe and efficient funct`rons of fire, police and
public utilities within the context of an aesthetically pleasing
resort setting.
6,2_2 Palicv: Nlinor improvements (landscaping, decorative paving,
open dining decks, etc_), rnay be permitted on Tawn
of Vail land or right-dt-way (with review and approvaf
by ihe Town Council and Planning and Environmerotal
Corrrmission when applicable) provided that Tawn
operatiaras sueh as snow remaval, street rnaintenance
and fire deparkmeni access and aperation are able ta
be maintained at current levels. Special design (i.e.
heated pavement), maintenance fees, or ather
cansiderations may be required to flffset impacts an
Town services.
Staff Response: ~
Staff believes the proposal helps #o obtain the goals and objeetives of the Vai3 Village Master
Plan.
IX, STAFF RECOMMENDATI4N
7he Cammunity Develop€nent Department recommends appraval ofi the request for a minor
exterior alteration pursuant to Section 12-7B-7, Exterior Alterations or Madifications, Vail
Tcawn Code, to allow for a commercial store front addi#ion ta tne Slifer Building, located at
230 Bridge Street/LQt B, Black 5-C, Vail Village 1 5T Filing. Staff's recommendatcon is based
upon the review of the eriteria in Section VI{I of this memorandum and the evidence and
testimony presented. Should the Planning and Eravirortmental Commissian choose to
approve the minor exteriar alteration request, staff wouFd recommend the following findings
be made:
1. That there are no sub-area concepts which relate direc#ly to this
redevelopment praposal, and therefore, the rederrelopment proposal is in
campliance wiih the Urban Design Guic{e Plan for Vail Village.
2. That ihe redevelopment proposal is in compliance with the lJrban Design
Considerations for Vail Village.
,
3. That the redevelapment proposal helps to achieve the goafs of the Vail ~
Land Use Plan, and therefore, the proposal is in campliance with the Vail
~1
~ Village Master Plan Gaals.
4. That the redevelopment praposal is in compliance with the goals prescribed within the VaiC Village Master Plan.
5. That the redevelaprrrent proposal is in compliance with the purpose
statement far the Camrrtercial CQre I Zone District.
X. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Reduced Plans dated March 19, 2004
C. Letter from the applicant dat2d February J, 2004
D. Publication Natice
~
~
12
.
'i
.
> =
'L I.~°c-". x"e:` ~ - ' 'Y S t n . . ~ ' Lo
n
wt .
~g 1~ '
R~
r
,~i;,;' ~s.na' kQ Y "t ~ ~ . t +~•r °-+-+y:.~'~'Sx~ :`~w .
~ ' +t~'~ ray~ , ~•.I~' 4`at'.-°s •
r~~ ~
4 , r g a~y~..~':.. r Y ~ ~ ~ • •s ~,l~,~~+= .
Y~ ~ ~ Y~'' ,M ,L ?.2~~-, * .••..~'1 4 ~ v[ ~ , .
g g~~~g ~s.~ -s~ar~~ • ~ ~5 ~ ~
,._~g $ r ~''L,`~
,
a ~
rw, v :ita ~ ~ e` ~ E~~~
~ 5 ' : ,a y g~ ~s~ ~N ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ 4
ts
a d ~
O
~
~
~
s" ~ a ~ ~5,~ • 4.,"'' • ~t r~ .
~ ~ _ ~ ~ .'"y ` ~ * x. ,
' { . "7 ~a . e ~~4 i~,`~ ~~r ~ d _ s``~k . 'rt ; • :
. , .
+ 4 'r y ? 74p+"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'Y
, j ° y, f • - ~c~~~
-.4~ , 3 ~ .m,`~F '~a ~ ~ ° ~"'~a t . y'rvw~~•'~ : ~ W.,. ~
T ° < ~ d x ; 5
~
~T~'j
a
~ .
12 ~
~}•?~~c ~r~"~~.' 7
~ 1RS3',~'~d
k P- § 2 zs 4 1 a : 7P~'?`~~( ~ ~ ~~s E~
5 «F
~.4.1 ~ ? . i 5 ~ ~ ,~y>~. ~ m
q ~ ~ ~ : @ ~ l ~ { . I'~ ~ 1 '~'~9~9 _ +.v"~~~t C V
r[''~
p3 f"'.a~
~
..~~~~Y ~ nd. ~jt Z~; k ,~c ..t ~4..a.
+ ~ J
w ~3 -wat' -i -~A'rv a*'Y'i'~'#f-?~C ..d~``` F „ ; 1, ~ ;F <
~
. y~ 7
t . re 44-
+ r om ~ t,;~. €
Attachrn ent; A ITN
~
Q7 L„ z
O~~) a . .
O ry' N '7 I tsS ~
CL 4J.J Lr3 .f~
U ~ O~~y~ 0
e .
_ ~ , o, E• -c -c -c a C]G V W Q
~ G 'z ro :1 CL. F- Ck~ d
z c~. i; e5~°._.,` ~A L~ 2 z OQ U u? La
Zi`~„~
H $ ~
ILl~~o.7~
C[ :g e E~-~~n ~ LJ7 ~ C
0~a9:i 0 i b ~ L
i '34 8.2
d ° U -O p F- > ~
Z ~ ~ p z
~ o LU o ~TI 0 ~ O
ce p u w ~ 0
~ tl5 M!~ = U
~ ~
~ 0
~ ~ . ~
V) '0 G ' .
vj _ C O
O
O v ~ O
C _ W
~
€7 p C'~ 41 {S 1 O `Ir e .
.O E o 'tt .ax, o
x~ o.~ a 3 0 ~ 0 1> ck~~.
' w ~0 = o°- a'm 4.p r Q Q
a ' v ~ ~ o
z`u ~ c a `c "U ~ a ~ aii m
C , , a ¢ s m y ~
-a ~ ~ a a ~ o 0~
' ~ -o ~ • - o o
13
o
~ 3 i Z
3~( y o ds w~- o Z.s 0
~s ~
iloydsd
r,.
~ ~~''~i , : _ ,~,z' --i ~ ° ~ i "
- - ~
~
JD ---~3 a
o a-w o
o
3: c u o 0
m -6 y
`o ~ rn s o i -ba.~ £ ~
~ ti°-~-a2s 3~
x E
o o~ (~i p o '~n)>,
-0.0 ¢~.o
, o a E.~~ o
~
~ xc E
z ?
~r~~---~ os . . • _
- ~ u-'
ti'~ ~
d~. 71 ~t'' / _ ~ ~ S l ~ ~ ~ ~
l~
~
r
~
Attachment: B -
cZ 0
2
E
~ ~ ~ g $ ~ ? ~ u'~p O
0- LLJ~n ~
~ ~ayZ°~v
'34''~ r~ 7 0 ~ J
~c c4 a o a u~ ~a k~l W ~
c.u~~~ a.~~_ o;a ~
4a. i,.-.!s d .
tg,
-ii" .rL C
-
- U
ti ,c
C
Z ~ 0
V
N•
> ~ .
_ - ' ~ ~ _ - _ _ LL ~ .-~.p.
w ~
c
a
E
o w
/ ~ , • 1 ~ ` ' ' _ Z =n c
Q o
V3 c7
_ ~ ~ f ' ~ ^ C
Q a
~
~
~ ui w m
- r--~ - •~e~. ~ - , . W ~ ~p -zf=
I .
. ~ .
0
~
~M
u.~
- ~
,
~
01
.
~ ~ . r~ • . • ~f` }
\
,
.
- - ~
i
~
•
~Z~
oG ~ ~ k.s a: C~ to fn In LiI ,+-ti z Z
. << ~wa~°~s g '04 0 g z m a ~ fl ~ O 0
41 n
n~H dw~ Q
J
me O~
~ ~~'~v~~i. ~`$•~`•`~~a a'r~ v ~ f y ~ ;U ~ 0
m ~ I W
Im
k~
~E&~~~6
4T'.--:. - ~ ~
1L_gk`.~ C _O C
CJI 6 ~ f1
p`.gij- C'j p
a rn ~ y .
cr _ a~' t' ~ -a o o -o
4
LU 3m
a =
LU
c,v
...2
~
. ,
, ,
~ E .o
y~ r
5
p
Q
~c
Or ~ a
/ n y o
# ' Z ` •a~ o
n.w~r •
CLi ID
L,., a „
~
a.y
d)
~ f C N
o
O- O O > Q°
q- G C7 VCi" ;~n~~ ~ ~ C V
O
~i c zc~~'
m D
p ~ Q ~ ~~,'~,•'a0 ~ ~ o+ ti ~ Y Y m 0 m
~
; ~
iu ~
, w (p 3~~f z E
\ \ . . Y ~
1 ~ . 9
~
W0 z Z
~ .
<M ~~;=,4~~ o ~ $i ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ O
8 ~ ~ v~ a
q~~tt ~p ~ u5 N N P O O5 W
ce w ~
U~z~~ Lr)
w ~
7 e ~ ~
_~~zg=.
q0s . ~ ~
m
;c~~e.~~~ ~ a E E
~ez5 Qj 7
. C r.. C O 0 C u ~ O O
' u O ~ .
?O
w U3~ o Ln
C ,
~ cx
LL. ,
w w o
- - ~
\ 1 I~' ~ 6`= c~i] E~
, r y r r~- Cv o
CL- d h ~ .
~ p o ~
~
o
i
'°L
m '
- - - - - - LL.i cn Z ~ .
. . . . . -
~~~w.9~i1 . •
. i -
~aH
rfr 1 ' . ' I
f ' Y
. ~
~x• J F~ k ,
z
0
~
~
, w
~ i3e
Q
LI)
~ LLI,
cn
> o
r---,:.
~
a-
•a o
- Z -
0 n
„a-,a Q ~ ~ •
c ~ a =
.
LU
w
~
m ; c, u ~
E O sn v)
x C?• a ~ o
w ii I r,,1 d,~ co
Z
~ a r a c~
O
w Z
^ L/)0p Q
V
CI- ~ ,e~i " ~ I V
~ C C 4 $ t.E U U L1C. 0 !..1 ~
~ U O6, o ;aJ -G!'~' ~ ~ pq C3- ~
~ +
3sa;,~^ 0~
«~d 5
1 ig ¢ 'v) 6
N
41 X
1
II
B s
ui ~1~
E ~
Ir 7- # E
0 .1a~~~
v ~O >
'B O
4 a - g, p d n' ~ 3 a~+ 5
y Q` d~~ ZN,O
3 V q O E- ~ V ~ cr
04 e 3 0- rn ° a0. a N 0 -°Cy o Q °
a-•- ~ ~ , ' 3 ~ ~ ad a`+ •
CO0 > o 03~0
`m Lu a a
Q 0. 0 ° ~ -a a . a c ~ _ Q y, p 'my • ne -D .
-,3a 00-0
-p~
ai ~ oa 3~ 3~ 3~ o n.~ o`.- w E
~ p
rn CL E c E-
X ~ o
w w a d ~ K ~ ~ t ~ d•~ ~ p o
Z aiS CJ c~ ~
w 3
Q -o c
( I T - d p
p
U3 O
~
Zi C'a N Q
~
o
Q
w ci.i ax
u O
ta m
s
i
~
- -I- f-- I 9
~
4D
I aa I '~d I E o `mm
3 o- __.I CL~
' -0v Q °7 a dS 3
~ 3 e
~ a
~ IV v.. y N
z ~ ,3 D
r
z O] [D 1J t~ V
i i
I I v
Y
C ~1 ~1 V'
t
E ~
a - - o~.- -
tl ~ I c I . _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ ' ' - _
W
O~
9I~ ~
Q/ W~ 0 tLI
~ o'°~ o °
W 2: I,C Ly ~I
~
~
I
. ~
. ~
www.slifer.n ee
A JDiNr VeNrUnr wirH
Vwic Rmeaets
March 4, 2004
Mr. Warren Campbell
Town of Vail
Comrnuanity Development
75 Sauth Frontage Raad West
. Vail, CO 81657
Dear Vitarren:
I feel that the Minor Exterior Alteration I am applying for ineets the Vail Viltage Urban
Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master PIan.
In the Vail Village Master Plan, I wiIl enumerate the goals this proposal complies with. ~
Goal #1 It certainly is of high architectural style and scale.
Gaal #2 It helps prornote tourism, will be more attractive to our visitors and is
certainly an upgrade.
Goal #3 The ctianges proposed will make the space much marc attractive and
inviting to pedestrians.
Goal #4 In CC1, this doES not apply very well.
Goal #5 i don't believe it affects transpnrtation or circulatian.
Goa1 #6 This cllange will not affect service or delivery since all wiIl be made
thraugh the alley in back.
Also, in the sub area of Commercial Core l, I feel it certainly complies and adds to all the
elements rnentiaiied. Again, architeeturally, etc. it becomes a better building and
especially improves as a retail space.
1?~zil Village CJfficr ~
230 Bridge Street * i/ail Coloradu 81 0'57 - Tr.•lephone 970 470'2421 • Facsamile 970 476 2658
~ ~ .
~ ~Vai1
° Attachment: G ANUAFEAD
Page 2
~
In addition, I feel it will comply with and enlzance the goals of'the rnost recent streetscape
plan.
I hope this is enaugh information in outiining hoW we camply with the applicable znaster
plans and piaxming dacurnents.
Best regards,
/er
~~tc~ney E. SlRESIjt
~
~
`e L~4 •
T 0 9 oF VA LEL #
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PRQPERTY
PUBLlC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY G1VEN that the Planning and Environmenta6 Gommission of the Town of
Vai1 wili hold a pubfic hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6, Vail Tcawn Code, an Apri1 12,
2004, at 2;00 PM in the Town 4f Vail Municipal Building, in considerativn af;
A request for fma[ review af a variance pursuant to Section 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Cotle,
to allow for a new primarylsecondary residence to encraach into the #ront and side setbacks and
a variance from Chapter 10, Off-street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to al(ow for
required parking to be Iacated within the public right-of-way, located at 2830 Basingdale
BIvd.ILot 5, Block 9, Vail Entermountain, and setting farth details in regard there#o.
App[icant: W.L. Braer Construction
Pianner: Matt Gennett
A request for a minor exterior alteration pursuant ta Section 12-713-7, Exteriar Alterations ar
Nlodificatians, Vail Tawn Cade, to allow for a commercial addition to the 5lifer Building, Iocated
at 230 Bridge StreetlLot B, Bloclc 5, Vail Village 1St Filing, and setting forth details in regard
there#o.
Applicant: Saifer Suipding, LLC
~ Planner: Warren Carnpbell
A request for a canditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-16, Conditional Use Permi#s, Vail ~
Tawn Code, to allow for a temporary seasonal structure within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone
cEistrict, iacateti at 715 West Lianshead CirclefLots 4& 7, 8lock 1, Vail Lionshead 3'" Filing and
Lots C & Q, Morcus Subdivisian, and setting fQrth details in regard thereta.
App6icant: Vail Corporation; represented by Nlaurielfo Planning Group
Pfanner: 4"Varren Campbeil
A requESt for conditianal use perrnit pursuant ta Section 12-7E-4, Condi#ional Uses, Vail Town
Code, for an amendment to the existing private club (i.e. parking club) canditionaf use perrnit,
lncated a# 12 Vail Road (Vail Gateway)1Lots N & Q, Black 5D, Vail Village 1 st Filing, and setting
for details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Ga#eway Plaza Condominium pssocia#ian, Inc., represented by Greg
Gas#ineau
Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a variance frrm Section 12-21-14, Restrictians In Specific Zones On Excessive
Slopes, Vail Town Gode, to allow for the cvns#ruction of driveways and surface parking in excess
ofi 10% of the total site area, located at 2388 Garmisch DriveILot 9, Black G, Vail Das Schone
2nd FIIing, and setting farth details in regarti thereto,
Appficant: Snow Nouv, LLC
PCanner: Warren Campbell
A request for a work session to present an overview of the propased redevefapment p{ans for the
Lionshead Core Site Hatel, located at 675 Lionshead PEacel(a camplete legal description of #he
proposed deveiopment site is available at the Tawn of Vail Community Dev'elopment Department upon
request), and setting for detail$ in regard thereto. ~
Applicant: Vail Carporation
Plarsner: Gearge Ruther
Attachment: D
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWI`TERS
~ TO
230 BRIDGE STREET
Property Owner Property Owned
Pepi & Sheika Gra-nisbw-iznier Gasthof Gramshammer
Gasthof Gramahanaauer 231 Bridge Street
231 East Gore Creek Drive Lots C,D,E,F,G,H,I, Blk SB
Vail Vail Vi11age lst Filing
Dave & Rene Gorsuch Gorsuch, Ltd. & C3re House
Gorsuch, Ltd. 263 Gore Creek Drive
263 Gare Creek Drive Lots C,D,E, B1k SC
Vail Vail Village 1s1 Filing
Ron Riley P& R Condominiums (R.usselI's)
P& R Catldomiz~i.ums 228 Bridge Street
228 Brid,-e Street Lot A, Blk 5C
Vail Vail Villaae ls{ Filing
~ CharIes & Elizabetlz Koch RE Tnast P& R Candaminiums
4111 E. 37th Street N. 22$ Bridge Street
Wichita, KS 67201-2256 Lot A, Blk 5C
4'ail Village 15` Filing
Jim and Jeanne Gustafsan Covered Bridge Building
Covered Bndge Building 227 Bndge Streei
SQ E. San-iple Road, Suite 400 Lot B, BIk SB
Pozxzpano Beach, FL 33064 Vail Viliage ls` Filu-ig .
,
~
MEMORANaUM
~ TO: Planning and Environmental Commissron
FRQM: Qepartment of Community Development
DATE: April 12, 2004
SUBJECT: A request for a condit«nal use permit pursuant to Sectian 12-16,
Conditional Use Permdts, Vail 7awn Code, to allow for a femporary
seasonal structure within the I ionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district,.
located at 715 West Lionshead Circle/Lots 4& 7, Block 1` Vail LEOnshead
3{a Filirag and Lots C& D, Morcus Subdivision, and setting farth details in
regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Corpora#ion; rEpresented by Mauriella Planning
Group, LLC.
Pianner: Warren Gampbeli
1. SUMMARY
The applicant, Vail Corporation, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC. is
requesting a canditional use permit as outfined in Section 12-16-2 (Conditianal Use
Permit), Vail Town Code, to be Eocated at 715 West Lionshead CFrcIe/Lots 4 & 7, Block
1, Vail Lionshead 3Fd Filing and Lots C& D, Morcus Subdivision. The conditional use is
~ requested to allow the applicant to erect an 80-foa# by 90-foat temporary seasonal
structure on the Marriott tennis caurts from Aprii 30 through Juiy 31, at v??hich point it
would be relacated ta the Marriott parking structure from August 1 through C)ctober 31,
2004. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria autlined in Section VIII of this
memorandum and the evidence and testimony presentecf, the Cammunity Development
Deparkment recorrzmends appr4val of this request subject ta the findings and conditions
nated 'rn Section IX af this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTIOhJ OF THE REQUEST
The Vail Marriott Mountain Resark is requesting a conditional use permit to allow for a
temporary seasonal structure to be erected on the existing #ennis cour# site on the south
side of the hotel from ApriE 30 through July 31, (Altemative 1 on the site pian) at which
point it would be relacated on to the Marriott parking s#ructure from August 1 through
Uctober 31, 2004, (Alternative 2) an the site plan. This temporary seasonal s#ructure is
a tent which wifl be used by the Marriott to host cflnference groups and other Iarge
groups utilizing the hatel facilities. A vicinity map is attachecf for reference (Attachment
A).
This proposal is differs from the Vail Maeriott's previous cQnditional use permit requests
for a seasonal structure in that it prdposes rwo alterraative locations_ The operaiion af
ihe structure will be as it has been in the past. The reason for requesting approval of the
structure rn two Iocations is that Vail Corporation intends ta begin construction August t,
2004, on the Gore Creek Residences which were approved by the Planning and
~ EnWironrnental Commission on February 9, 2004. Proposed Alternative 1 is the locatian
which has been approved #or the seasonal structure in the past an top of the existing
tennis courks. Alternative 2 is on the upper parking deck af the Marriott parking
structure. There is prQposed ta be a pedestrian cantipy leading from the west end of the
1
NCarriott building to the parking strueture. The height of the canopy will be approximately
15 feet in height. The location of the seasonal structure an tap of the parking deck ~
displaces 35 parkirrg spaces, which is almos# half of the 73 par€cing spaces which exist
an the upper parking deck. As the 35 of the required parking for the: Marriott, the
applicant has prQposed a plan utifizirrg valet parking service for guests of the hotel.
Vehicles to be parked by the valet service wi61 be placed afl the Holy Gross Lot where
Vail Resorts seasonal employees park. In the euent that cQnstruction of the Gore Creek
Residences daes nat begin on August 1 S` or is de['ayed, the seasonal structure wiif
rernain on the tennis courts until such time as cons#ruction begins. A copy of the site
plan identifying the #wa proposed alternative locations is attached for reference
(Attachment B).
The praposed structure is ta be used by hotel guests participating in conferences. No
autside visitors will lae arriving at the Marriott to utilize the structure. The structure is
proposed to be a white 80 foot by 90 foQt "Genesis Pavilion" with a marquis walkway
leading frarn the hotel to the structure in both proposed locat6ons. The structure wiil
have a portabie amplified speaking system, lighting, and twQ propane heaters. The
propose hovrs of operation are from 9:00 am to 6:00 pm, seven days a week. The
apPlicant's Ietter o# request (Attachment C) and specifications far the structure
(Attachment D) are attached for further detail.
, 111. BACKGROUND
• On June 20, 2001 the Planning and Environmental CommissiQn approved a
canditionai use permif for a one year period for a temporary tent on the Marriot#
#ennis courts. ~
• On August 22, 2002 the Pfanning and Enwiranmental Cammission again
approved a conditional use permit far a one year period for a: temporary tent on
the Marr9ott tennis courts.
lV, REVIEWING BOARD ROLES
Order of Review: Generally, applr'cations will be reviewed first by the P,EC for
acceptability of use and then 6y the DRB far eompliance of proposed buildings arrd site
planning.
Plannin and Envirvnmental Cammissian:
ActiQrr: The PEC is respansr6{e for final apprnvaUdenial of CUP.
The PEC is responsibGe for evaluating a praposal for:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objeetives of the Torrrn.
2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution a# population, transportation facilities,
utilifiies, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other pubfic facilities and public
facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference tfl congestion, automotive and pedestrian
safety and coravenience, traffic fl'ow and cantrol, access, maneuverability, and removal of
snow fram the streets and parking arsas.
~
4. Effect up4n the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located,
inCluding the scaEe and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrQUnding uses.
2
5. Such other factars and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use.
6. The enuironmentaf impact report concerning the praposed use, if an environmental ~
impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title. ~
~
Conformance wi#h development standards of zone district
Lot area
Setbacks
Building Height
Density
GRFA
Site caverage
Landscape area
Parking and loading
Mitigatiorr af developrrient impacts
Desiqn Review Board:
Actian: The aR8 has NO review aufhorify on a CUP, but must review any
accompanying L?RB applicatiorr.
"Town Council:
Actions of DRB or PEC rnaybe appealed to #he Town Council ar by the Town GoUncil.
Town Council evaluates whether or not the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denials
anci can uphold, upho6d with modifications, or averfurn #he board's decision.
~ Staff:
The staff is responsible far ensuring that a11 submittal requirements are pravided anc4
plans confarm to ihe technical requirerrtents of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also
advises the applicant as to compliance with the cfesign guideCines.
Staff provides a staff inemo eontaining background on the property and provides a sta#f
evaluatian of the project with respect to the required criteria and finciings, and a
recommendation on approval, approval vuith conditions, or denial. Staffi also facilitates
the review process.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS ~
A. Town of Vail Zoning Regulatians ~
In the past, the tent has been approved in canjunction with a special event urrder the
defindtion of a"seasonal use or structure." Hawever, this tent is proposed to be in
service for more t9aan a month which is much more temporary. The Town Code defines
a"seasonal usE or structure" as:
A terrrporary covering erected over a recreafionaf amenity, such as a swimming
pool or tennis court, for the purpase of expanding their use irrto the cold weather
rnonfhs. Such seasonaf covers may rrat be in place fvr more than seven (7)
consecutive morrths of any twelve (12) month period. Far the purposes of this
Title, a seasanal use or structure shall no[ cQnstifute site coverage and shall not
~ be subjeet to building bulk contral standards. Any seasonal use or siruc[ure shalf
requrre a condltional use perrr7rl in accQrd with Chapfer 16 of this Title and is
subject to design review.
3
For the Planning and Environmental Ccammissian's reference, Section 12-16-1, Vail
Tnwn Code, identifies the ;purpose for a conditional u5e permit as follows: ~
In order to provide the flexibilrty necessary ta achieve the abjectives af this fitle,
specified uses are permitted in certain districts subjecf ta the grantlrag c+f a
condifional use permit, Because Qf their unusual or special characferrsties,
conditional uses require review so that they may be locafed properly with respect
ta the purposes of this title and wrth respect to ther"r effects on surrounding
prapertres. The review process prescribed in this chapfer is rnferrded to assure
compatibility and harmonrous development between eonditivnal uses and
surroundfng prnperties in the Town at large. Uses listed as condrtional uses in
the various districts may be permrtted subject to such conditfons and 1imr'tatiorts
as fhe ra4vn may prescribe to insure that the location and operati+an of the ~
condrtional uses will be in accardance wrth the develapment ob1ectives of the
Tvwrr and will rrot be detrtmental to other uses or propertles. Where conditr`ons
caranoi be devised, #o achieve these objectrves, applicatiorrs for condrtianaf use
perrnifs sha11 be denled.
The Marriatt ss lacated within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district The purpase of
LMU1 is :
The Lrvnshead Mixed Use 1 l7isirici is interrded fo provide si#es for a mixture of
rnulfrple-famrly dwellr'ngs, ladges, hotefs, fractfanal fee clubs, rime shares, lodge
dwe111ng units, restaurants, otfices, skrer services, and cammercral
establrshments in a clustered, urtified developmeni. Lianshead Mrxed Use 7
Dlstrrct, fn accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Masrer Plan, is ~
intended ta ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities
approprrate ro rhe permltted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the
desirable qualities of the Qistrict by esfablishing appropriate sr'te development
sfandards. This District is mearrt to encourage and provide incerrtives far
redevelopment in accordance wrth the Livrashead Redevelopment Masfer Plan.
Thrs Zane Dlstrict was specifically develaped to provide incenfives for properties
fo redeweCap. 7he ulfimate gaal of these irrcentives is to create an econamrcally
vibrant Iodging, housing, and cQrnmercl'al core area. 7he incenfives in this Zone
District include rncreases in allawa6le gross residenflaE flaor area, buildrng height,
and dertsity over the previously esfablished zvning in fhe Lionshead
Redeveloprnent Masfer Plan study area. The primary goal ai the incenfiwes is ro
create econamic cQnditions favora6le fo inducrng private redeveloprraent
consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Additianally, fhe
inceniives are created to help fr'nance public off-site improvements ad,jacent ta
redeveloprnent projecfs. Wifh any develapment/redevelvpment praposaf faking
advantage of the incen[lves created herern, the following ameriitres wall be
evaluated: streetscape irnprovements, ped'esfrian/bicycle access, public plaza
redevelopmen[, public art, roadway rmprovemenfs, arrd simflar improvements.
B. Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan
The N9arriott is alsa governed by #he develapment abjectives as stated in the Lionshead
Redeaelopment Master Plan. Of the six Policy Qbjec#ives outlined in the Lionshead
Redevefoprnent Master Plan, s#aff has identified the following Qbjectives as appficable to ~
this propasal :
2.3.1 Renewal and Redevelopmerrf
4
~L+onshead can and shaUid be renewed and redevelopment fo becorne a warmer,
mare vibrarrt enviranment for guests and residents. Lionshead needs an
~ appealing and coherent rderrtity, a sense of place, a personality, a pur,pose, and
an improved aestheric character.
2.3.2 Vitality and Amenities
We must seize fhe opportunity to enhanGe guest experience and carramunity
interactian through expanded and additional activrties and amenifies such as
performing arts venues, earaference facilities, ice rrnks, streetscape, parks and
ather recreational improvements.
The Lionshead Redevelopment Master PIaR specifically identifies the tennis courts as an
infill opportunity:
There are several tennis courts on the soutfr side of the Marriotf. This area
presents and opportunity for low-rise rnfilf development rhai eases the visUal and
physical transitdan fram the exisfing struciure ta the Gore Creek recreatran path.
C. Vail Land Use Plan
Staff believes the folEowing goaEs and objectiues from the Town of Vail Land Use Plan,
apply to this propasal:
2.4 The community should rmprove scrrrlmer recreational and cultural
opporfunities fo encourage summer tourism.
~ 3.5 Enferfainrnent oriented buslness and cultural activities should be
encouraged in the core areas to create diversity. More nighttirne
busirresses, on-gorng events and sanctioned "street happenrngs" should
6e encvuraged.
VL 20NING AhJALYSIS
Zaning: Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District
Land Use Plan Designation: Resort Accommodations and Services
Current Land Use: Mixed Use
VII. SURRDUNDING lAND USES AND ZONINC
Land Use Zonin
North: R'esidentia! Lionshead Mixed Use-1 District
South: Open Space Natura! Area Preservation District
East: Mixed Use Lionshead Mixed Use-1 District
West: Mixed Use Lionshead Mixed Use-1 District
Vill. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
The review criteria for a request af this nature are established by #he Town Cade. The
praposed temporary seasonal structure is iacated withan the Lionshead Mixed LJse 1
Zone District. Therefore, this proposal is subject to the issuance of a conditional use
~ permit in accordance with #he provisions of Chapter i 2-1 Vaii Town Cade.
5
A. Consideration of Factors Reqardinq Conditianal Use Permits:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development abjectives of ~
the Town.
5taff believes the praposed seasonal structure in bath Iocatidns is consistent
with the purpose of the Lianshead Mixed Use I zone district. The tent
pravides additional facilities for the hotel, while ensuring adequate light and
air. 7he location of the tent on the parking structure may have rriinimal
impacts on the residential uses to the north. However, staff belie+res that the
haurs of operatian and the limited exterior lighting will reduce any negati+re
irnpacts associated with having the tent on the parking structUre.
Staff beltieves #hat because the use `ss temporary, there wifl be no effec#s on
future development of the tennis court site. Therefiore, staff believes thad the
proposal is cansistent with the Lionshead Redevelopmen# Master Plan.
2. The effeet of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportatian facilities, utilities, schoals, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public facilities needs.
Staff believes the proposed struc#ure in both locations will have neglig'rbfe
effects on the above-mentioned cri#eria. The location of the structure on the
#ennis caurts has no impact on the use of those facilities as they are defunct,
and therefore, no recreational uses are being displaced. Because of the
temporary reature of the structure and the manner in wFaich it is to be ~
operated, staff believes that there is no effect an the use of light and air.
3. Effect upan traffic with particular reference to congestion, automa#ive
and pedestrian safety and convenience, #raffic flow and control, access,
maneuverabitity, and remoWal of snow #rom the street and parking
areas.
Staff believes that the propased structure will have negligible effects on the
above-mentioned criteria. The proposed plan to utilize a valet service to park
guest's cars on the Holy Cross Lot will adequafely address the temporary
displacernent of 35 parking spaces on the upper deck of the parking
siructure. The Holy Cross Lo# is rreostly vacant during the summer months
which eliTninates any potential conflict between Marriott`s parking needs and
Vail Resart's parking needs.
4. Effect upan the character of the area in which the proposed use is tn be i
located, including the scale and laulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
As a: seasanal structure, the proposed tent is ndt subject to bulk and mass
standards of the LRanshead Mixed Use 1 zone district. Because it is
temporary in nature staff believes there will be no effect on the character of
the neighborhood. There are no exterior lights proposed in canjunction with
the tent. Staff believes the addition of landscape pfanting po#s around the
perimeter of the seasanal strvcture will help to mitigate any potential negative ~
visuaf impacts of the tent being located on top of the Marriott parking
struc#ure.
6
B. The Planninq and Environmental Commissian shall make the follawinq findinqs
before qrantinq a conditional use permii.
~ 1. That the proposed lacation of the use is in accardance with the purposes
of the conditional use permit section of #he zoning code and the purposes
of the Lionshead Mixed Use-1 Zone District.
2. That the propased location of the use and the conditions under whieh it
will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or rnaterially injurvaus to properties or improvernents in
the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will cornply with each of the applicable provisians
of the conditianal use permit section o# the zoning code.
IX. STAFF RECUMMENDATIOIwf
The Carnmunity Deveioprnent Department recommends tha4 the Planning and
Environmental Cammission approves the applicant's request for a conditional use
permit to aIlow for a temporary seasanal structure located at located at 715 West
Lionshead CircEeiLots 4& 7, Block 1, Vafl Lionshead 3Fd Fling and Lots C& D, Marcus
Subdivision. Staff's recammendatian of appraval is based upon the revoew of the criteria
described in Sec#ian VIII of this merrno and the evidence and testimony presenteri.
Shouid the Planning and Enviranmental Commission choose to approve the appeieant's
request, skaff recommends thai the foflowing findings be made as part of a roiotion:
1. That the proposed facations of the use is in accordance with the purpases of the
conciitianal use perrnit sectivn of the zoning cocle and the purposes of the distriet
in which the si#e is located.
2. That the proposed locations of the use and the conditions under wh'rch it would
be operated vr maintained would not be de#rimental to fhe public health, safety,
or uvelfare or materially injurious ta properties or improvemenis in the viciniiy.
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the
conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commissian Ghaase to approve this request,
staff recommencfs the falfowing conditions of apprcrval;
1. That the applicant shall not erect the tent prior to April 30, 2004 and that ihe
applicant shall remove the terrt by na later than actober 31,2004.
2. That the hours of Qperation shall be from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm, seven days a
week.
3. That the applicanYs operation of ths termporary seasonal structure comply with all
Town of Vaif regulations regarding noise levels.
~ 4. Tha1 the applicant install a minimum of six, 50-gaflon planting pots, containing a
combination of evergreen trees and flower p[ants in each pot, in associatian with
the Alterraative 2 seasonal structure locatian.
7
r
5. That the applicant receives a Town of Vail building permit prior to erecting the
tent,
X. ATTACHIUIENTS ~
A. Vicinity Map
B. Site plan showing proposed structure focations
C. Letter fram applicant March 2004
D. Tent specificatians and photographs
E. Publication Notice
F. Af#idavit of Publication
i
~
,
~
$ -
_ ~
.
~
.
~ .
A ~"w,~ ~
~ w ~ ~ :
g S l
k
~iev~
'Ji
bq 40,
;~~'o-~r~
rs b
Y ~ ~ ~ +1~,~ r+ ` e ~'dBx ' yr r t • -~s c
t '~~.a . f'.- r ~ ? .
7~
x
~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ` _ •~`~.~r,~ > Q ~ r ~a `
, . . r _ :
; WPs°' e,...;
v+t~~Y'
41 D'^~
.~5~' {,'a~. - ~~~x. ~l~ , t{, d ~t~L ~~rti{ ~1 ~R ~.@~~•
„ t ;;~`Y~ ~ ~.ti ~ ~ t . k . ~„e~ {~~.~..,a•. „ ~ ,
1 f , b
Ss 4f
"7~C ~ ~4~. ~ ~ ~ ~rs '
..a ~ ~ ,a s+„ s ~ ~ . a ~m• t~'# ~
~
d
.
T fR ~ _ ?.-=y
C ~
~kk
~ ~ .
~ ~Sw. q',. a _ ' ~q~ "'rM~' N K•. + _ 4 I `~S~, ~'y,gk+.§ .
SY
aa
AC ~ .
LL
s ' L w ~f t~' a wr
CD
m~'
Lo = 3
~~-WG i.s,' a -r- ~r L.'
~ g .'"'.'~S~ ~"~`tl[' Gl~~ .~r ~r-~Sx e. ? 6' . . ; ~ ~
N
't .
~
s, i• ~jl K ~
~"~`a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . O ~ •
Attachment: A
- -
-
OCl~~O"10~ '~I'dlr - ANOt ia m ~
S.?iC?53~:1 N1Y_LNf10W 1101'a1'a'v'W 4~3f?;~:~i[~ ~;r ` ' % ~ ~
Y
N'vr-1 c=4 _LNaL
~ y 1~.f,' ~ 4 _ , ~ ~ - , Yk
3 ~ .r ~ ~ f ~ ^ . . . , • .
'4
' G y 1 • d x~ P`a 4 / ~ } } ~ , . i , r I(~ \ ` . . ~ L~~ .
~y
\
y`~ i F'. , i ~
~ x~ a~ ~ lo~~ .4p~ . ` . ?iii ~ ~A~ff
V g y y~ N .r ,rw+ ~ - ` ` , ~ xa f
'~l ! b a +
~~m ' a~'" \ ~ . ` . ~ I
~ - '~~f ,,..~r~~'~~:..~~~ ...\m~~ ` ~ • ~~`~2~~
~ ~ - ~ ~ `5, / ~ i u ' ~ . , ~ ¦ Sa~
\ a4f . F :
~
u
LL~
~ ~ ~ e ~ • ~ :
a ~ t
r~
~\X
W.
~ ~ r ~ ~ I I I ~ i ~ . Y _ _
~ . f ~ . . . ~ . . . . . . ~
s'" ~ 1 ~~~I~~ V ` - ~ ~ ~ ~ • •,a .
~'i ~ 1,r , r r~ . ~ -
~ti~
1
t-
i
}1 ~ 5l~ ; t ti ~ •`N y ~ 1 ~ I
1 ~
K. ,
w ti. }~I l~ i 14~ lW illl
? t', ~ ~ ~ l~. I~` } ~ . 5 ~ w^" t a S; ~ p ~ ?`1~ ti
m
4 , iy ~aY +1 ~
~ Yil ~ ,t , a! . t .F ~ .ia,~~ r3 ~j.
j 4 a 1 ~ ! py,x
~ ~ i • ~ y ~ ~t,.~, s z ~ ¢ -k ~ R . ! P ~~I ~ ~ . ~
. ,
. e a
c
SIT
4e \ Y ~I 5 V 1 %y;t• .
i
l1 y
a
1 - t~.
K . K
5,
1 ~ ' ` _ . ~ _ .
yp ` 1 I ~ l L.~ ~ 15~ _ ~ ~`k~ f~l` ' • p } ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - ~-i y~' ° F I ~ .•I
i ~
~ ~•r ` ~ 1,~ _ L__=~1~'rTliu~J ~ ri~ ~ ti
~ . F'' ` ~
1 l~ '
At#achment. B
~ ilci
Mauriella Pianning Graup
March 17, 2004 ,
tiNarren Carnpbele
Planner 2 ,
Town of Vail ,
75 South FrQrrtaoe RoaM
Vail, Colorado 8 1 F57
`
Re: Parking Plan Special Event Yent on Parking Structure ,
Dear ti'ti/arren:
~ Th15 letter is intended to clarsfy the parkinc~ p~an in-tMe event that the special
events tent is erecied temporarily onpthe Niarriott parking 5tructure.
The upper level of the parking 5tructure currentfy contain5 73 parkeng 5pace5.
The proposeJ tent location will di5pkace 35 parkina spaces in order to provide
adeqvate space `or the, tent and adecluate room around the tent. Qccasionally,
depending on the event, there may be, a need to 65place mare than 35 parking
5pace5. The displaced parking will be pravided sn the Haly Cra55 parkinC3 lot,
which is mosrly empty during the 5ummer month5. That parkrn~ {ot ha5 the
capacity to hold more than 220 parked cars (5ee PEC appraved parkinc3 pEan
actached).
When a hotel cjuest ar 5omeone attending an event at the Marriott Mountain
Resort arrme5 at the hatel, the vaiet 5erv+ce will park their vehicle in the holy
Cro55 lot. Therefore, gvests to the hotel will nat be required 'co park at Lhe holy
Cross lat and walk back to the hatel.
I hope this clarifties the parking arrangement at the Marrioit Mountain Resort
durmc~ the usaoe of the temporary special events tent for thi5 5ummer.
~
F'O Box 4058•Edwards, CO 81632•Office: 970-748-0920-Fax: 970-748-0377•Cell: 970-376-3318•maurietlo@comcast.net
Attachment: C
~
Thank you in aduance for your help with th15 applIcatIon.
Sincerely,
DominiG F. Mauriello; AICP
°rincipal
~
~
1
~
Marriott Mountain Re5ort
Temporary 5pecial Event Tent
;
~
;
Application far Conditional Use Permit ~
i
~
~
~
March 2004
A.pphcant: Marr~ott Mountain Resort
2epresented by:
bominic Mavrre-llo, AICP
Mauriello T'Iannene~ Group, LLC
PO BQx 4058
Edwards, CO 8 I 632
970.748_0920
~
~
~ I
I. [ntroduction and Background
For several years, the IVlarriott Niouiltain Resort has utiiized a temporary tent to
ho5t special event5 5uch a5 conferences and weddings on its campus an
LionShead. In June 200I and August 2002 the Planning and Environmental
Crmmission approved a temporary tent on the existing cenno5 courts for langer
periods of time sa zhaL the tent could be utiltized throuqhout the cour5e of the
5urnmer.
The MarriGtt has- sulamitted an application ta allow the temporary 5pec+al event
tent again this sumnzer from April 30 to October 3 I. The tent will aeatn be used
for conferences and wedding receptians. This year, hawever, the application 15
51ightly different. The Marciott would Iike to have two alternative kocatians
appraved, but only one to be utilized. The for5t tlocation would ~e the existing
tenni5 court area 35 apprOved in the past. 5mce this locatinn may be
compromised by the comsiruction of the Gore Creek Residences, the Marriott
wauVd hke the PEC to cansider an aiternative gite: the top of the Marriott
parkin9 5tructure.
H. Location Alternatives,
If the tent as placed in the tenni5 court area as in previous years, there are na ~
additional site modificatron5 requireci. however, if the tent 15 erected upan the
Marriott park,ng 5tructure, the tent will displace approximate{y one-half (35
spaces) of the existing 73 parking spaces pn the top level af tne structure.
Since the 35 park.ing 5pace5 are part of the required parking for the Marriott,
these parking 5pace5 mu5t be accommodated en close proximity to the Marriott.
The Marriott working with Vail Ke5Qrt5 plan to make use of aportion of the
parkinc appraved for ihe tioly Cross parcel ta the west of the Marnott 5ite. The
haly Gra55 parcel has been approved for employee parking, however during the
summer month5 thI5 parking lot 15 m05t1y vaeant. The West Day Lot, another site
eonsidered for the displaced parlcmg, will be used far construction staging for I
the Gore Creek Residences. '
In order tfl provide protection of tont u5er5 s'rom the weather, the Marriott 15
al5o proposting to pravrde a temporary Ganopy from the west end of the Marriott
to the parking siructure- The canopy will be placed at the height of the parking
5tructure and therefore w711 not interfere with venicular access to the par'king
structure.
~
I
~
IlI. Condit+onal Use Revaew Criteria
The following is a list af the criteria that t:he Planrnng and Zanin'a COmm1551on 15
required to con51der in thP review of a Conditionai Use Permit. We have included
our anady5i5 of the prop05ed u5e relative to the criteria.
1. Relationship and impact of the u5e on the development objectives
of the Town.
OUr ACPo/y5t5;
Tlje proposed seasonal structure r5 GpnS1.5tent wrth the ,purpo5e of the
Lronshead Mixed Llse Azor,e d15trrct, the borrshead Redevelopment Master
Plan, and the goal5 of the L'a1! Land U-5e Plan. rhe tent prourde5 additronal
faafit1e5 for the hotef, rrvhile ensuring adequate fight and air Go neighborrng
properffes and uses.
.Si,nce the use 15 temporary rn r7ature, there wrll be no negatrue fmp.~cf5 to
the future deuelopment poter7tral of the tennrs court area car any permanent
rrnpacts td the Marriott parkrny 5tructure. Th,e tent u?rll allarnr the Marrrott
to retain scheduled conf&rence.5 throughout the 5ummer.
~
2. The effect of the use on light anc# air, di5tribution af pepulation,
transportation facilitie5, utilities, schools, parks anci recreation
facilities, and other public faci4+tie5 need5.
C7ur qna/L,515:
The pro,pv5ed use wr1J have ne.gligtble effects orr the a6ove-rnentionecl
crrterra. T17e proposed a/terrrative 10CatIor75 o{ the tent on the tenrn5
courts or the Marrrott parkir7g .5tructure ivrll have no negative ,mpact on
the future use of tha5e facifrties (the tennrs courts are currently defurrct
and the parkXng spaces are berng tempdrarrly relocated). Due to the
t'emporary naCure of the te.nt structure and the manner !n whrch rt /-5 to be
operated, staff belreues that there 1s na effect ori feght ancl arr, drstrrbutron
of pc,pu/ation, t.ransportaticn F3c1litre-5, utr/tties, -5chaol5, parks, recreatian
fgc111t1e5, or other pL11211c facilibes,
~
2
3. Effect upon traffic weth particular reference to congestion, ~
autamotive and pede5trtan 5afety and convenience, traffic flow and
control, acce55, maneuverability, and remavai af snow from tihe
5treet and parking area5.
Dur Ana/ysis:
The propa5ed structure vuf ll have neglEgtble effects on the above-
rrPentioned crrteria. Autamative and pedestrran traffic in the area wiIl
maIntairred to the M,arriott ula newly e5ta1;V15hed srdewalks ancl the exrstrny
crrcufdbon 5y5tem along West bonshead Circle. If the parkrng structure
location 15 ultrmately se/ected for the ere~-tion of the te nt, parkrng wrlA be
prOvrded on the h'oly Cross Parcel, wfirch has 6een u5ed for employee
parkrng thrs cR?rnter. Srnce the tent will onfy remain up u'uong the summer
rnanths, Chere rs no effeCt on snow remauaJ fro.m G-ne street and parkrng
areas.
4. Effect upon the character af the area in w'hich the pr+apo5ed u5e is
to be located, includsng the 5cale anc# bulk of the prapo5ec! u5e in relat+nn
ta 5urraund4ng uses,
Qur Ar7alysr.s.
As a 5ea50nal structure, the propo5ed tent 15 not sul~rect to laulk and ~
ma55 stana'ards of the LronShe,?d Mrxed U5e I zore distrlct. Slnce it
temporary rn nature there will be no permanent effect on the character of
the ne,yhborhood.
IV. ApplicabSe Plannine Document5
LiQnShead Redevelapment Ma5ter i'Ian:
The Marriott rs govc:rned by the development objectIve5 of the bon5head
Redeuelvpment MaSter Ptian. Of the sox Palicy Objectives autlbned in the
bonshead Redevelopment Master Plan, the follow~ncj objectIves are
appl+cabje tQ th15 prop0501:
2.3.1 Renewaf ancf Redevelol~ment
Liorsshead can and should be renewed and redeve~opment to
become a warmer, more vibrant environment for guests and
re5ident5. bon5head need5 an appealing and coherent ident7ty, a
sense of pface, a persona#ity, a purp05e, and an improved ae5thet1c
character.
.
3
~ 2.3,2 Vitality and Ainenetie5
We must setze the opportunity to enhance guc5t experience and
cammunity interaction through expanded and addif:ianal act,vities
and amenities such a5 performing arts venues, conferencr, facihties,
ice rinks, 5treet5ca?e, park5 and other recreational improvement5-
The L,on5head Redevelopment Master Plan specIfically identifies the
terrn15 caurts as a~ infi41 opportunity:
There are several tennis courts on the south 516e of the Marriott.
This Orea pre5ent5 and opportunity for Iow-r15e infill development
that ea5e5 the vi5ual and phy5ical transitiprr From the exi5ting
5tructure to the Gore Creek recreation pach.
VaiI Land U5e F'lan:
The following goals ancl objectives fram the Town of Vail Land Use Plan
support the proposed u5e:
2.4 7he community 5hould improve 5ummer recreational and
cUltural opportvnitie5 to encourac3e 5ummer tour~5m.
~ 3.5 Enteriaanment oriented bu5ine55 and cultural activitres should
be encourac~ed in the core areas to create diversity. MQre
ni9httime 'eusinesses, on-going events and sanctianed "street
happenings" 5hauld be encouraged.
~
4
N'v"-ld 11ti1=;1.
1p i 4 ~p
Irr1P'~fl~ r+.'.' ` ~ nn ve ~ ~l~ ll " ~ ~ ~ 'q+~ . a t'• 7 1 _ ~ ~ ~ i
r~(I J 1 ~ pp ~ , r
.L_
I ~ a86 4_4 y y r3' ' 1 ~ o ti l ' a ~~ga
c!
p J~
Y ~ ~ ~ ` t~ , t ~fi - ~ z 15
e
.
1 rr a:. .F ~.1; ~ ` y~ • ` `
~'C'~' r,,4 ~f ~ : ; ~ • ~ ` ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~
i !.r ~ : • ~ ~ 1 * , ' -r
~r ~ ~ ~ ~ \ _ A`~ 1 e.~ i " ~
4~ ~ 1~'~`l`~ ~~ti~l~~~~l,~~~ t ;5~, , • ~ ~ ~ ~ty ~ ~ ~ r'
' ~1A•~, '~~4 ~1~~~11~I~~11 4, ~11 ~ ~ ~l ti. , " 9° " ~ , ~ " • ~q
I 1`\1\\\ ti 1 A ~ 1~~ -
sF ~
~ o t ~I
1 ~ t`. 1 t 1~: ~l` 1,147 S1 E,^~ 1 1 ~ •'t ~~f- = -
N
1~
i ti~ ~l ~ ti ~C~ ~ ~ ? ~ ti ~ ti~' _ ~ ,t4 ~ '
1~~F `.~~L
Rrt
1 nl ~ ' ~ , a~,~ s ~ ~
a ~ ! , +
Q~ ~ ~ ~ 1 V ~~~ti1° L~~t1~\ x$ ~ ~ j ~ ,1. M~
d ,I
~ ~r~•~ „~iti ; - _ - .l~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ f~ ¢ ~
~
~tz
, ?y~ ~ j~;~/~r
L
i
~~V ~`~l~~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i• ~
4t~. w. ~ , -•,`~i , ~ 4 ;~tl-~
t ,i~ z: •w
6310Nlf"iNd 00:81:90 tr014Z1Z0'6f^PueldSual\ao7,Ce01saM16mP14DOZ0AOll:d
. MAR-21-03 FRI 04:32 PM P,01
PAVILION
80/ GENESIS
3Q`MID
SIDE VIEW
3afMrD
_
30,
80' x6O'
2-28• cENTER POLES 150a 30+MiD 20'
28-7' SIDE POLES
28 S`fAKES ANd f20PES •
" 8(l'x'90'
-28'cErrTER Pvi~s
3 7' SiDE POLES
34 ES AND RC?PE5 30'MIII
80`x1p0` -
6-28 ` CENTER POLES
40-7' S1DE POLES
40 5TAKES AND RDPES
30'END
SO`X1cJO'
8-28' CEN'TER PQI..-ES
48-7' SIDE POLES -I
46 STAKES ANn ROQES
TYPICAL PLAN
as, .
. sc?+?-E
1 0 20 30
Attachment: D TT END P L a C~
Distinctive ent~xl s Inc.
Tent _
. . : . . . . _ .
~
~
,
s
?
~F~S~" , ~l ~ ~ ~ f~
~ ,~C',~ cr .
~r .
~~'-'a °L ~4~ ; ` .,~Y,
S~+~s
_ ~ 'f
_ L
e `
4~
b~~*~, „ ~ i
i M[. \
~ `s ~
f ~ '
dl~~~~-uI.
.9
< ~l
"ttr,~ ~ .
r~~ q~. .
~ ~ Yly~~ 4 i~ 'H. 4 i~
~Q
~ ~
' f Yi~~
~ r~ ~ ~
~
su
i ~ ~Y
~~a ` _ ~ ~-'4
. ~ 3~ 'S'4hr .g .
. ~a~a ~~'-5 .
f Y
9 r'
f,~y. 5~ ~t,.,~ 'ti~s' .
~
. ~ ~ ¢
^.iiT ~j, '~,;f.s ~
.3~„r°^ ~
mt ~ .
~ ' ;I Ij 'I £ ~
~ ~ ,
~ ~
1` r.
.
_ t
~ ~~NQFYA~~ `
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PRQPERTY
PUBLIG NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GlVEN that the Planning and Environmen#ak Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6, Vaii Town Code, on April 12,
2004, at 2:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal E3uilding, on consideration of:
A request for final review of a variance pursuant 4o Section 12-6D-6, Setbac'ks, Vail Tawn Code,
#o allow for a new primarylsecandary residence to encroach inta the frant and side setbaeks and
a variance from Chapter 10, Off-street Parking and L.oading, VaFl Town Code, to allow for
required parking to be located within the public right-of-way, located at 283(] BasingcEale
Blvd.ILot 5, Black 9, Vail Interrnounfain, and setting farth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: W.L. Broer Canstructian
Planner: Nlatt Gennett
A reauest for a minor exteriar alteration pursuant tca Section 12-713-7, Exterior A.Iterations or
IVlodifcations, Vai( Town Cade, to allow for a commerciaf additian to the Slifer Building, located
at 230 Bridge Street/Lot g, Block 5, Vail Village 1't Fiiing, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Slifer Buiiding, LLC
Planner. V1larren Carnpbell
A request for a canditional use peemit pursuant fo Section 12-16, CanditiDnal Use Permits, Vai9
~ Town Code, to allow tor a#emparary seasonal struc4vre within the Liortshead Nfixed Use 1 zone
district, located at 715 West Lionshead Circle/Lots 4& 7, Bloek 1, Vail Lionshead 3`d Filing and
Lots C& D, Morcus Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Corporation; represen#ed by Maurielfo Planning Group
Planner: Warren Gampbell
A request for conditional use permi# pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Conditivnal Uses, Vail Town
Code, for an amendment ta the existing private cEub (i.e, parking club) conditional use permit,
located at 12 Vail Raad (Vail Gateway)lLots N& O, Block 5D, Vail Vil9age 1s4 Filing, and setting
for detaifs in regard thereto,
Applicartt: Vail Gateway P{aza Cancfominium Association, Inc., represented by Greg
Gastineau
Pfanner: Bill Gibson
A request for a variance from Sec#ian 12-21-14, Restrictians In Specific Zones fln Excessive
Slopes, Vail Town Code, to allow for the cans#ruction of driveways and surface parking in excess
af 10% vf the total site area, located at 2388 Garmisch DrivelLot 9, Blocfc G, Vail Das 5chone
2nd FIlIflg, and setting forth details in regard thereta.
Applicant: Sn4w Now, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
A Tequest for a work session to present ara overview of the proposed redevelopment plans for #he
Lianshead Care Site Ho#el, lacated at 675 I ionshead Place/(a complete legal description of the
pTOposed development site is available at the Tawn of Vail Comrnunity Development Department upan
~ request), and setting for detaiEs in regard thereta.
Applicant: Vail Corparation
Planner. George Ruther
The appficatiorts and informatian afaout the proposals are availabfe for public inspectian dearing regular
Attachment: E
Marriott Temporary Tent Agplicatinn ~
Adjacent properties Owners List
TOWN OF VAIL
i'INANCE llEPARTMENT
75 S. FRC?N`i'AGE ROA.D
VAIL, CO 81657
1
COd.OR.A.DO DEPT OF TRAP;lSPQRTATI()N
4201 E ARKEINSAS AVE
DENVER, CD 80222
1
VAIL CORP
Pa 13ox 7
VAIL, CO 81657
1
ENZIAN GONDOMINIUM A55OCIATION
CIQ GEQFF WRIGHT
610 W LIONSHEAD CIR
VAIL, CO 81657
1
I,14N SQUARE CON?DD ASSOC
660 V4'' LIONS HL° AD PL
VAIL, CO 81657
1 0
LIOIJ SQli ARE NORTH Ct}NDQ ASS(7C
660 W LIONS HEAD PL
VAIL, CO $]{57
1
MONTANEROS CQNDOMI`1IUM ASS4CIATION
DI7ZA KFITH
641 W LIONSHEAD CIR
VAIL, CO $1657
1
TEXAS TELEVISION INC
PO BOX 16290
HOUSTON, 'T"X 77272
1
TI IEA J. RUMFORD LIVTNG TRUS`Z' - RUMF'(7RI7,
HEATIIER A. & FREDERTGK C.
675 FOREST RD
VAIL, CO 81657
1
PARSOItiS FAIVITLY LLC
PO BOX 497
EL7WARD5, CO 81632-0497
1
ADAM, N.ANCY SHAPiRO
~
Attachment: F -
~
,
~ 4975 E PRESERVE
GREEN'JVOQl7 lr1LLAGE, CO 80124
L
31+IILLERS LIONSHEAD LLC
12770 MERI'I' DR STE 400
DALLA.S, TX 75251
L
CADOL, ROGER V. & SALLY M. -7T
9850 E k'R(]GRESS CIR
GREENW[10D VILLA,GE, CO $0111
1
COLMAR LLC
251 FOWLER RD
FAR HILLS, N.T 07931
1
MAFIER, JERARD F. & .TOAN S. -JT
251 FQWLER RD
FAR I-IILLS, 3*1.T 07931
1
E.NGLE:VIAN, JOI-IN S. &S7'EPHEN B. - HATHORN
MARY M. G10 MARY M I4ATHORItd
54] ELY RD
ELY, VT 05045
1
GENERAL COMMLT'~1ICATIONS TNC
~ ATTN: A. EM'.~'IET STEl'HE.NTSbN, JR
] 00 GARFIELD ST 4TH FL
DENVER, CO 80206-5554
1
NANE.TTE S. ELENB AAS LIVING TftUST -
NANETTE S. ELENBAAS TRUS1'EE
3328 OAKDALE
HICKORY CORN ER.5, MI 49060
c
ANTLERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOC
680 W LIONSHEAD PL
VAIL, CO 81657
1
VAIL. 5PA CONDQMII'kiIUM ASSOC:
710 W LI(7NSHE?.D CTIt
VAIL, CO 81657
1
VATL SPA C(7NDOMINNM ASSOC
SHtiGHART THajV1SFJN & K1LROY PC
1050 17TH ST ST'E 2300
DENVER, CO 80265
1
EAGI.E RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT
$46 I'OREST RQAD
~
~
V AIL, CD 81 fi57
1
MAURIELLO PT,ANN]ING GRatiP, LLC
PO B(?X 405$
EDWARDS, CO 81632
~
~
~
~ MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and EnWironmental Commission
FRC)M: Cornrnunity Development Departrnent
DATE: Aprif 12, 2{}04
SUBJECT: A raques# for conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Conditionai N
Uses, Vail Town Gode, for amendments to the existing private club (i.e. paricing
club) conditional use perrnit, located at 12 Vai! Road (Vail Gateway)lLats N& O,
Black 5D, VaiE Village 1$t Filing, and settirag for detaiis in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Gateway P[aza Condominium Association, Inc., represented by
Greg Gastineau
Planner: Bill GibsQn
i. suMMARv
The applicant, Vail Gateway Plaza Condorninium Association, Inc., is requesting a
conditional use permit pursuant tfl Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, 'l/ail Town Code, for
amendments to the existing private club (i.e_ parking elub) conditional use permit, located at
~ 12 Vail Road (Vail Ga#eway)ILots N& 0, Block 5D, Vail VilCage 15t FiEing.
Based upon Staff's review af the criteria in Section Vlil of this memorandum arad the
ewidence and testimony presented, the Cvmmunity Develapment aepartrrment recammends
approval, with one conditian, of the requested conditional use permit, subject ta the
findings noted in Section IX of this memorandum.
[I. DESCRIPTIQIV OF REQUEST
`fhe applican#, Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium Association, Enc., 'rs requesting a
conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-7E4, Gonditianal Uses, Vail Town Code, for
amendments ta the existing priuate club (i.e. parking club) conditional use permit, located at
12 Vail Road (Vail Gateway}fLots N&0, Block 5D, Vail Village ISt Filing. The applican# is
proposing to amend the existing parking ciub, focated within the Vail Gateway Building,
from 39 for-lease enclosed parking spaces to 13 for-sale enclosed parking spaces, with the
remaining 26 enclosed parking spaces being designated for ather specifc uses within the
Vail Gateway Bui1ding. The prapased changes to the kQtal number of parking club spaces
and the ownership structure far those spaces are the most significant elements of this
request. These proposed arnendments are in accordance with the proposed arr7ended
Parking Plan (Attachment E) and condominium plat {Attachment F}.
The purpose and intent for a conditional use permit is noted in Section 12-16-1, Vail Town
Code, which reads in part: ,
~
~
In order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the olajectives of this titfe, ~
specrfred uses are permitfed in certain districts subject to the granting of a
conditianal use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics,
conditional uses require review so thaf they may be located properly wrth respectfo
the purposes of this title and with respect to their effects orr surrounding
properties...
III. BACKGROUlVD
C?n July 23, 2001, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved, with conditions,
the existing private parking club. The private parking club was approved in accordance with
the appraved, existing Gateway Building Parking Plaro (Attachment C) and the Vail Gateway
PCaza Amended Condominiurtm Map (Attachment D).
IV. RQLES UF REVIEINING BODIES
Planning and Environmen#a1 CorrEmission:
Action: The Planning and Enviranmentai Commission is responsible for final
appravatlapproval r+vith conditionsldenial of a conditional use permit.
The Planning and Environmen#al Commission is responsible for evsiuating a proposal for:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on developrnent objectives of the Town.
2. Effect af the use on light and air, distribution of populatian, transportation facilities, ~
utilities, schaols, parks and reereation facilities, and other public facilities and public
facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestian, automotive and
pedes#rian safety and convenience, traffic flow and contral, access, rnaneuuerability,
and removal of snow fram the streets and parking areas.
4. EfFect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located,
including the scale and bu{k of the proposed use in relatian to surrounding uses.
5. Such other fae#ors and criteria as the Corrcmission deems applicable to the
proposed use.
6. Canfarmance with deveiopment standards of zone district.
Desiqn Review Baard:
Action: The Design RevierH Board has NO review authority of a conditiona] use permit, but
must review any accompanying Design Rsview application.
Town Gauncil:
Actions of Design ReView Board or Pianning and Environmental Commission may be
appealed to the Town Council or by the Tawn Council_ Town Cauncil evaluates whether or
not #he Dessgn Rewieuv Board or P{anning and Environmental Commission erred with
approvals or denials and can uphold, uphvld with modifications, or overturn the baard's
decisian.
~
2
~ Staff:
The staff is responsible for ensurang that all submittal recquirements are provided and plans
conform to the #echnical requiremertts of the Zoning Regulations. The stafF also adui5es the
applicare# as to complianee with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff mema
cantaining background an the property and provides a staff evaluation of the praject with
respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recomrr7endation on approval, approval
with Gonditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DQGUMENTS
Town StafF believes that the folfowing Town of Vail planning documents are relevant to the
review of this praposal:
TITLE 12: ZQNING F:EGULATiONS
Chapter 12-16: Canditianal Use Permits
12-16-1: Pur,pose; Limitafions: In arder to provide the flexitailtty necessary to
achieve the objectives af this title, specified uses are permiffed rn cerfain districts
subject to the granting of a conditronal use permrt. Because of fheir unusual ar
special characterisfics, conditional uses require review so fhat they may 6e located
properly with respect to the purposes of this tifle and with respect to their effects on
surrounding praperties. The reviewprocess prescribed in this chapteris intend@d to
assure compatrbility and harmonious deuelopment between condrtianal uses and
~ surrounding pro,nerties in fhe Town at large. Uses fisted as canditional uses in the
various districts may be permitfecl subject to such eo»ditions and limi#ations as fhe
Town may prescrlbe to insure that fhe location and a,veratiarr of the carrditional uses
will be in accordarzce with the development Qbjectrves of the Town and wi!l not 6e
defrrmental to other uses or properfies. Where conditiarrs cartnot,be devrsed, to
achr"eve these ob1ectives, appficatibns for corrdifianal use permits shall be denred.
VA[L LAND USE PLAN
Gaa12.8 - Day sklers need for parkrng and access should be accammodated
through creatrve solutions such as:
a) lncreased busing from out of town.
b) Expanded points vf aecess to the maunfain by addirrg additional base
portals.
c) Carttr`nuing to pravide temparary surface parking.
d) Additian of sfructured parking.
VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
Gaal 5- Increase and r"rrrprove fhe capacity, efficiency, and aestfrefics of the
franspartatron and circufatian system throughout the Village.
5. 9Objective: Meet parking demands with pualie and private parking facrlities.
~ 5. ?.3 Poficy: Seek locations far addifianal strucfured public arrd private parking.
3
i
I
VAiL TRANSPORTATION IVIASTER PLAN ~ I
~
Parking Need Goai:
Retain the private parkrrrg supply as an important arraf rreeded elemenf.
Vi. SITE ANALYSIS
Zoning: SpecaaP Development District #21
Land Use Plan Designation: Village Master PBan
Current Land Use: Mixed-use
Hazards: None
VII. SURRQUNDING LANk] USES AWD ZDNING
Land 19se Zaninq
Narth; CDOT 9,70 Right-of-Way Unzoned
South: Mixed Use Speciai Development Distriet #6
East: Mixed Use Special Development District #fi
West: Gas Station Special Develaprnent District #36
VEII. CRITEaIA AND FIhID1NGS
The review criteria and factars far consideration for a request of a conditional use permit
are established in accordance with the provisions af Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Code. ~
A. Consideratican of Factors Regarding the Conditional Use PerrnPt:
1. Relafianship and impact of the use on #he develapmen# objectives of the
Town.
The applicant is proposing arnendments to a private parking club which is
allowed as a conditional tase in Special Developrnent aistrict #21. ln addition ta
the Vail Ga#eway Building, a parking club exists at Golden Peak and anather
parking club is being propased at the P3&J site.
The existing Vail Gateway parking club cansists of 39 parking spaces that are
surpius to the Vail Gateway Building"s current uses {i.e. commercial, residential,
and office}. Pursuant ta Ghapter 12-10, C3ff-Street Parking and Loading, Vail
Town Code, different land uses are required to provide parking at differing rates.
For exarnple, within the Vail Gateway Building residential uses are required 1.4
spaces per drveEling unit, office uses are required 2.7 spaces per 1,000 square
feet of net fl4or area, retail uses are required 2.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet
of net floor area, and res#aurant uses are required 1.0 space per 250 square
feet of seating area.
As stafed, the existing 39 space parking club consists of parking surplus to the
current Vail Gateway Building uses. Should the use mix wi#hin the Vail Gateway ~
Building change, the parking requirements rnay also change. This may create
4
~ additiona! surplus parking within the building or it may create a shorEage and
existing parking club spaces will need to be removed from the club and
dedicated to ather uses. Should #he parking club spaces be sald/trartsferred
separately, as proposed, itwill be rnuch more difficultto designate ciub parking
spaces to future uses within the building in comparison to the current leased
parking club ownership structure. To address this cnncern the applicant has
prepared a parking analysis ta identify the "highest demand'° parking
requirements for the builciing (i.e. entirely restaurant andlor office uses). Based
upan this analysis, the applicant is proposing to amend the parking cfub
conditinnal use permif to allow a total af 13 parking spaces. This request to limit
the parking c{ub to 13 spaces will ensure that the saleltransfer of the parking
club spaces will nok create future parking shortages for other patential uses
within the building.
Staff believes this request confarms to the following applicable Uail Land Use
Plan objective:
2,8 Day sklers nesd for parking and access shoerld be
accomrricadated through creative salutions such as:
a) Increased busing from out of town.
b) Expanded points of access to the mounfain by addr`ng
addrfional base portals.
~ G) Corrtinuing to provide temporary surface parking.
d) Addifion of structured parking.
Additionally, Staff beiieves this request conforms to the following applicable Vail
Village Master Plan goal ancE objective:
Goa! #5
Increase and rmprove the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the
trarispartafion arrd circulatian system throughaut fhe 1fi1lage,
5.1 Objective: Meet parking demands with pu6lic and private
parking facilrties.
5.1.3 Policy: Seek Iocafrons for additional structured public
and private parking.
A,dditionally, Staff believes this requesf conforms to the following appficable Vail
Transporta#ion Master Plan goal:
Retain the prFvafe parking supply as an important and needed
element.
By continuing to provide surplus parkirrg, Staff beloeves the proposed private ~
parking club amendments +rril6 cantinue khe positive impac#s of the existing
~ parking club on the above-mentioned criteria.
S
2. The effect af #he use on [ight and air, distribution of population,
transpor#ation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreatian facilities„
and ather public facilities needs.
Sta#F does nat believe the proposed conditional use permit amendments will
have a significant negative impact an the above Iss#ed criteria, in comparisort to
existing condifions. By eontinuing ta prouide surplus parking, Staff'believes the
praposed private paricing c[ub amendments will continue the positive irnpacts of ,
the existing parfcing clvb on the above-mentioned criteria.
~
3, Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, autQmative ~
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, i
maneuverahility, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. !
Staff doe5 nat believe the proposed conditional use permi# amendment$ will
have a significant negative impact on the above listed criteria, in comparison to
existing canditians. By continuing to provide surplus parking, Staff believes the
proposed private parking club amendments will continue the positive impacts of
the existing parking club on the above-mentioned criteria.
4. Effect upan the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be ;
located, including the scale and bulk vf the proposed use, in relation ta
surrounciing uses.
StafF does not believe the proposed conditional use permit amsndrrients will ~
have a significant negative impact on the above listed criteria, in cornparison to
ex3s#ing canditians.
B. The Planninc# and Environmentai Commission shall rriake the fa[iowinq findinqs
before a ranting a conditional use permit:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of
the conditional use permit sectiort of the znning code and the purposes of
the Outdnar Recreatian zone district.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will
be operaied or maintained will not be detrimental ta the public health, safety,
or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improVements in #he
VlClnit'y• ~
3. That #he propased use will cornply with each Qf the applicable provisions of
the conditional use permit section of the zoning cotCe.
,
~
6
~
~ lX. STAFF REC{3MMENDATZON
The Community Developmenf Department recommends approval, with ane conditian,
for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Tawn
Code, for arnendments to the existing private club (d.e. parking club) conditional use permit,
located at 12 Vail Road (VaiC Gateway)ILots N& 0, Black 5a, Vail Village 1 St Filing. Skaff's
recommendation is baseci upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this
memorandum and the evicEence and tesfirnony presented, subject to the following findings:
1. That the proposed ioeation o# the use is in accordance with the purposes af the
conditional use permit section af the zoning code and the purposes af the
C?utdoor Recreation Zone District.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions undeT whfch it will be
aperated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the prapased use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the
candi#iona9 use permit section of the zoning cade.
Shauld the Planning and EnuFranmental Gamrnissian choose to approve this request, staff
recommends the fallowing condition of apprawal:
~ 1. This conditional use permit approual shall become wa(id upon the applicant
recEivi ng Tawn of Vail approval for the associated amendrnenis to the Vail Gateway
RCaza Condaminiums plat.
X. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Applicant's Staternent
C. Existing Parking F'lan
D. Existing Condominium Plat (excerpt)
E. Proposed Parking Plan
F. Proposed Condominium Plat (excerpt)
G. Public Notice
~
~
7
~ ~ ~r ~ f,~ ~t~* ~ ~~~~~1~ r '~y 'Lt~~c~?`. t 5 w..,.a> Attachment. ~ .
~ a ~ ' a~ ~ ~c - ~ -~i~' S~t~~.a,~. , Q
~ .
tA:,°"-""", r ~ ~ ~ ~ .raN v ' -
a x , r e~ r~^ * ~ ~ ~'k`~ ~ '~'e~ ~'i '6~f ~l~ r.«*,aa~,~~..~~
' ~ . . . . ~ ~
- , ~ s s . , ~ , - ~ ~ . ~ .ef~aa.~` ~-ro` a~
e ,~rs s. a e t k x ~
~ f ~
~ ,d,,,,..,,,.,*" 1 r s ~ t ~P ~ . . r„_ .'~.y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s
7 ~ ~ ? e ~y' ' ~Y $`L~ ~ ~ t,
~ ~ 6 S ~ ~'ax , ~ b E n~ry~& - ~ - ~i '4 ~.~yY;, 1'~"n„y _
kTi+
~ ~ a ^~^Mal~. ~ ~ .r c` . ~ ~ ~
7 ~ e ~ ~ ;~~"`'~~~u ~,u-,r ~ ~ e~~- ~~,a, -
s J : ~5~ i . " d;
;,6y~° ,y~ ~ p ~ ~°r`~ R.~ ~ x
, ~ 4. ~,x'` ~ ~ ~ ~ r
~ ~ ; e ~e ~1~ ~ ~ ~ f, ~ t x~Y - ~ ~ 5"` k
~ ~ ` L S ~ ~ . h~ ~ ~ ~'~°i h ~1 _ x'° c
~ J " yy,~ ~ ~ ~ 4•'.~ ~Y, ~
L f ~ ~ ~ . " Yy =',o ~s~ 'S ~1.` ~
~Yi i . - d..':. ,~„~.y'~'*y 4 - o
~ / ~k~ ~ F z"~~, ~ r.: 'L ~ i.i, ~ ~ "`'n
r- ti ~ r
e * ~
F a,~n y~k W ~
~ ~ t~} ~:i I 4ror . f y , , ~ „s'``=.~ ..ts-.~N~ ~
.4' r . 3. P .C . ^w~,~~ L ~~.~.n~ ~ry.y~ Sr ~
Y i{~ ~3'f- t • * i~ ~~4 ~ _ ~ q+'~ .m" -r. 1 . ~~_T ~ o
' ~ 5~ f f 4~R9f ~~t~,~ ~ Y ~r,~ ~ 0~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ 8
.:ii,~~~~ ~ ~ xR~ 6~~.~ ; ~ ~ •~~y 7 ' ~
im•S° i~' ~ -".r r ~ ° - ~ ~ F
~~y Yz" +,a N f~ dK' a . _.•~.w , :t ~ ~ e ~ . ~ . 8
~ _ ~ ~ a .d ~Ll ~ ,~j, .~r 2
k':. ~A . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . t~ ~ s
'S _ ~ ~'i~~~ 3t a ' ~ ~ "J ~ ~ - n
& * ~ W,~, ~ ~1y.µ}'y~, ~ E t ' ~ . a
4 ~ k ~ 'F ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ m
: . _ ¢~~~,4.(~' s~~~.~°~t~' r aY' .q~ ,~a~ ay ~f ~ `~~.~g G-,~ o .
i ~
s~ f?;~ a , : ~ ~~'~z ~ m
~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~s~' ~ ~ ~ ~c '
& ° % ~'~r . g ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
z a` ~ ^ ~ ~ : t~.~7 . ' ~ y ~ C..~_ :
' ` :
_ y,.y s r' ' x.. -g . ~.°`?-a. ~ . ~S l-. ~
~ ~ ~
~~~`ypy. ~t/"/. ~s ,~v~ ~ ~ ; ~ y~ a
~f :f' '+~a~~~' 4r.#r . ~ ~ R r ^ , ,.y~. d
k t 4 ~ E: y .E, a: J` y1~ . ~ _'u'+~ `d =
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f i. ~ Y $
a; - i e~~Fw- c ; 3 ~ . ~ j~ R ~ ~ ~ .9u~S~+. ~
~
_ ~~r}~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ _ .
2 _ 1 ~ T [ ~ ~ i '~j lY 'r ~ "s` _ ~ .
~ ~ ~ .,w'' '1 - ~ ~~`~y ~ ~
t;"`r.,,~ ; i.': ~z. ~;Jm~ a,~' -A/~. ~ a~ ~1 .r~; ~i i4-'_ a
s~„~ ~ , u~ Y - ~ ~ e
~"s' ~N~ ~ x 1/ ~ ~ ~ J t e ~ ~ ~ `
~c ' ~~~~J ,~_.,zrJ~'~'~"' n ii ~+•"t,' d^ ,[,y,yd ~ ,I.~ n
,
1f~b~`~'^ ae~.~+'`"~w'~'{~"~1 r~' t*w' ~ ~ ~'i ~1*~~° -~a'+~~~; ~ ~ +
~
r'°~*,* ~'3.t^~ ~~ga ~ ~ Ilf. ~ r F:~..,. ~ ~
z".'"a,~~r ~ ~'s re;;t~r~ ~ ~ '~,z;a ° ` ~ ~ L a ~,~~4 ~"iks'
4 i`~~ _ C Y r 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,s~"~ i ` 7,~~ ~ ~
~ ~ , G a S~ s # g ,u.,^v. «°e
~~n ~ "i~ ,t'~ +r `5'~ _ ~
z
~s~s~Yi.~` : ~ai"L ; . ' .
~ ~ ~ 'iwerxrut`~~t , ~e ~E+.~. '"„-,.'hr v~,r ~ tl[....a
, p~" t~ ~ ~ ~ ~'Gr'~ciC~= ~ta3 3 ~ a+5~. `t~ ~c3~ . ~ ,
g i' 41r, ~ ,~y~ ~ ' g i>'~~1~ ~ ~ ^#G'~ ~`~3 y~. k~~~~~~ ~ ~~.r~~~~~e~ ;
I ~ ~ y~ ~ . ~ 'r.G rp r y r+''• ~ £ . ff ~ K ~as ~i b ~ ~ f
~ : ~ =h ~ , r§ ; ~ , ,
~ ~ T ~rf ~ , ~
~ x~ ~f ~
~ `
~ ~ ~ ~ ; fi-~ ~ ~
' ' . _ ~ .4 F ~4 } I °t r
~ ~ ~ ' y~.~...
~ : d
~ i . t • ~ ~ i1 t~ - ,~•t : »f a~~ - ~
~ ` i' ~ ' ~S~c~'R' ie'~''
~ 1 yy ~ r' ~ ~ ~3 ~ . .
` h~ ~ f
i a
- r ~ ~ ~ ?~,1 i ~ ~ f,.Y;"~,~.~
~ W { $gg~+~~yggy,,,, ~ 3.. ~ ' ~ ~ _y~ ~ ~ ~
I.R} ~ i y. 4 ^U k~
~~p ~ ~~~Ai ~ ' i~ ~ f- ~ ~ ° ~ # -rc1 Q ' ~ ~ ~ ~ f 7 ,
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ , i ~ z
~ +it r~ ~ - Y '~eg t k,~ e ~ ~ ` ~ p `
~ ' ~ ~ Y ~ .•V
i
~ sz. ~'^".mt µ SY~ ~ d,.~;.. r~'4 t ~ r~'i 1` r c`' ~ ~~'c~'`
± ~ , ~S~ ; t ~ t~~ °p
.r a ~ ~ Y v} . ~k , a ~
~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ z k~~'~ S= ~ t~ ~~i s r' '6~,"'*~;~~~~~~$ ~ =
a 1
t ~ ~X~ ~ ~ ~''~~.`'r~ `q ~ ~ ' ~ . ak~, 1~' ~ g' P
~a3~ . ~ ;.q~. N.~. ~ ' b . ~~~e'x,~a~ ~ 9 . ~ ~ .3 a i ~
~ ~ ~ ~aa~°~ 5'8; ~ a,e~ i t;, x ~ . ~ ~j
~ ~ a. LMe~~~' w ~A'~ ' _ '4~^ ~ Ks,
a ` F S
' e
~~p , _ ~ ~ ~
~ 1 ~+.T A1_, .3 d. ~*Y . ~ ~
~ ' ~ L 0 ! Y :'{Y ~c~~ 1 ~ O
r,
~ i.' ~C,.-, •ut~ . . A`~ bym ~ ~l ~i '~r~~° ~ y~~ ~ R rfft~, ~
~
c , .
:.~f * a) y~. ~ t,...c • ~ ~ ,s~. = r s i f/f''4~~.." o ~
°r
~ _ ~ r _ ~ ~ gQ °w ~ ~ ~ 1
~ !m Y ~ ~ ~ d y3~:~° ~"a .
~ L~ w ~ : A ~ 4 r. r ~T ~ ~ a „ ~F S C ,R, , ~c - _ ,IP~ ~
' v J ~x ( ~ ~:Jµ~?.`5~ ~q p
Y. ~ i V S, lC ~¢'qs _ ? . i . I . ''i.~~ J+ P ~ , ~i
r , ~ ~y"`3' ? . 4
P. ~ . ~k. - R~ ..rE ~wiC"3 ~ ~ ~ . ~ r ,
Attachmen#: B
' Tl''VIBERLINE G()1VIMERCIAL REAL ES'TA"C'E
~
March 12, 2004
Mr. Bill ,,ibson
Towvn Of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Ct7 81657 BAND DELNERED
RE: Vail Gateway Plaza C'ondaminiums
Propased Gondominium Map Amendment
Dear Bill:
This letter serves as the written statement required by our Conditzonal Use Permit and SDD
Minar Amendment applications. Vail Gateway Plaza Condominiurxi AssaciatiQn Inc. and Vail
Gateway, LLC as the owners af condominium unit C-15, are reques#ing an amendment to the Vail
Gateway Plaza Condozniniurn Plat in order to accomplish three (3) objectives. The first is to
allow for the expansion of commercia] units C-2 8c C-3 by approximately 100 square feet each.
The second is to designate six (G) private storage clasets for residential use. 'I'3-ie third obj ective is
to subdivide -#~}-~e-{-~~}- of the parking spaces previaus?y approved for a"Parking Club" into
separate condominium units, to allow €or the individual sale of these spaces to the general public.
~ As the third objeetive is perhaps the tnast significant change to the condominium map, I have
included with ihis letter, an analysis of the parking requirements of the Town of '',1ai1 and hvw I
they reiate to the existing and potentia] future uses of the Vail Gateway Building. This analysis is
meant ta demonstrate that the proposed subdivisaon of parking spaces for individual sale witl not
adversely affect the exasting, ar future uses of the building. The analysis compares the parking
rcquirements of the commercial portions af the building under the existing office use, to those of
a higher parking intensity use, such as a restaurant. The analysis appears to show that the
buiiding has adequate parking to accornmadate even the highest intensity uses in the unlikely
event that the entire commercial portian of the building were ta be converted to into a restaurant
or restaurants. Please keep in tnind tllat the square footage of commercial units C-2 & C-3 on the
analysis reflects the proposed expansion area.
If you have any questians, or require clarificatian on any of these proposed ehanges, please
contact me at (970) 476-1464. Thank yau.
Sincerely,
Greg Ga ineau
~
] 2 V,4IL k011D, SUTTE 600 VA.IL, CD 81 657
970-476-1464 970-476-1986 FAX
~
~
~s
~
v
~
t~.
~
~
-r~
N
TC,4 cr`
C3+ ~
CS
y ~
Y ~
N ~ c3?
pp N~"
r. ela ~y, ~ ~ ,O-' ~
v a ~
-4th
rS
rr~ p 4+ ^
~ e~ G7 y
~
to
c~n `o
co ~ u,
~ 0 N
~
~
a3
~
.::00) ~ c
a ~o
~ a OC
+n ~ ~ ~ eJ
rPW
GA V~ O e? b~
p 4 a4 c~'~
0 v
~
R ~ ~ ' ~ ~i ~
~ ~ C7 +C yr ~ ~ ~ r;
~
~
~
~
~ r
a c~
v: ?z ~
eu ~ a~
v ~r 'Ii; co
~
a
~
~
~
v
u
~ U
C1. Q
~
N t7 ~(V N O N ~M„
:t7
C. ~ c c
zrp U
~ c
'~3 'O
~ v
~ t- CV d '~+'1 rvl N Cl k0 G' C
oo '~O O o0d" N O Ca Q 6
R
cn
C~~ {V ~ ~--o rn N M CA lei cC
'C3 'O
C C
E E
u o Q
N y~
~ C7 c'3
~a ~
^ -te
L.
cv v~r: tia n oc ~ p =`c
04 a~ a~ a~
~
I
~
I
. ~
u ~
e~ ca
Q., u
~ fl
~ try
- - - - - - ,y - ~
~
7..
cr y
d ~
y
~ O ~ CO 4L~ tiG RS Cd ftY [C7 C~j (d l~ Ld C
rn
a ~
~
o c~
U -
a
y, :S O
V1 L U ~
'
O N M~
~ .b cct C --cV r'~ `S +/j ~ h- IXy c3`+ ~ tiQ O O ai i3 .Y
c. a. p:., P-1 P. cl.
At#achment: C
~
Gateway Building
Parkinrj Pian
I
~
Prepared for Timberline CommerciaE E2eal F-state
Aucjust 13, 2001
i
;
,
APIPROVED BY THS
TC)WN QF VAIL
PLANN1NG Afi~~
~ ~~~MEWAL COMMISSION
CATE.
iqQ
,t"V761o Cr~
f . General Overview ~
This plan 15 intended to provide a general guide for how parkin,~ wial be managed at
the Gateway Building. The uses contemplated for the building inclUde
officelcommercial u5e5, re5kdential condominiurns, and a parking club. The parking
plan rnay need to be am~r~ded rrom time-to-time to aliow the mana&jem,-_nt of the
buLlding to meet the needs of potential build:ng users.
2. Existsny Parking Con6itian5
T'he parking for the Gateway Buildin,~ is located on three Ieve65 af the park7nq qarage
cantaining 93 parking 5pace5. fforty-two of the parkincj 5pacc,5, as Qri9inally
constructed, are tandem parking spaces. The Gateway budldincj is also entitled ta
one Town af Vail "pay-}n-Iieu" space purchased far a prevEouS use in the building.
3. Parwng by Llse
• Office/Commercial U5e - 4 I 5pace5
a 28 parkin<~ 5pace5 (tandem spaces) wtill be u5ed by the affIce
employees within the buildincj. OfFice space employees will have
de51gnated spaces and employees wlll be re6[u+red to coord4nate with
officerrrates on the use of the 5pace5. Tandem spaces will be a5signed
so that only empioyees of ond,vadual affice spaces wlll be reclUiced to ~
coordinate with one another.
0 6 parkmg spaces (tandem spaces) will also be u5ed by affice andJor
commercial employees (depending if the basement level 1 commercial
5pace, is ar+ office use, retail u5e, ar re5taurant use). ~
Q 7 parkinCj spaces (non-tandem) will be availab4e as general vi57tor
paricrng 5paces. This number may be increa5ed or reduced frorrs time to
time dependincj on how the need for visitor arid emplayee parkm6j is
experienced.
o All of the Gommercial/office park,ng Spaces will remain in tine ourner5hip
of the building awner to afford max,mum flexibilsty for use of 5pace5.
o Offsce parksn~ 5pace5 may be. made available- to other allawable
commercial u5e5 a5 long as hours of aperation do not conflict
restaurant 5erving in e+renincj haurs).
• Residenttal Uses - 13 5pace5
o 13 parking spaces (8 tandem 5pace5 and 5 non-tandem) will be
a551gned tv re50entEal unit5. These spaces wila remain in the owner5h)p
of the building awner; however, the re5idential u5er5 are guaranteed a
hGer15e t0 USe their SpaGeS.
r
• Parking Giub Use - 39 spaces ~
Gateway Building
Parking Plan
~ 0 39 parking spaCes will be made available for parkin,~ club mernbers.
o Par3cing clvb 5pace5 wl61 be subJect to a lea-5e. 7he building owner may
[ease 5pace5 such that the parking club member has a richt to use I of
39 5paces, which space may not be definitively defined (i.e., member
has a ric~ht to park, not a right to any 5pecifIc space).
4. Location of I'arkmg Spaces
The building owner 5hall designate parking spaces, subject to the provisians herein,
in 4ocation5 as he see f1t5. The intent 15 to allow the owner the maximum flexibility
with the functiQn af the parking area 50 that he wrll able to devCiop the m05t
effecttive and efficient plan and is able to react to market conditsan5, chancjes in
bui~diracj uses and u5er5, and 15 able to meet the needs of the V15itors to the
praperty.
5. Governance and 6an5pection
The awner agree5 to a41ow the Town af l/ail to 11`15pect the parkinc~ conditions at
anytirne. If a nuisance devel0p5 frrm improper management of the parkinc3 on th9s
property, the owner acjrees to address vaiid concerns or violatians of the Tawn of
Vail en a cooperative manner_ The owner further under5tand5 that the parklng
management pian 15 part of the conditional u5e permit for the residentaal anci parking
club u5es on the property and as 5uch ha5 the ability to take actian iri the future if rt
i 65caver5 vioiations to the canditional use permit. 51-Ibst3ntial change5 to zhe
parkinc~ plan 5hali be reviewed and approved by the Plannin,~ and Envsronmentai
Cpmm1551On.
6. Valet Parlung
As the owner continues to operate the parkincj areas to create efficient use of
parking and pravsde effective seruice to buildting v151tor5, he may choase to modify
the parkin9 plan and realiocate 5pace5 as necessary. This may include use of valet
5erv}ce on the pro,perty. This will depend upon the ultimate mix of office or
commerOal u5er5 on the praperty and the hours of operation of certam u5e5. In no
case wiEl veftc;es be valet parked off-stite ar will such valet parkin~ interfere w9th the
abihty to cjain adecluate acce55 to the 5ate. A valet system may bf added to the
sitp- w7thaut fucther review by the Planmmc3 and Lnvironmental Cornm7ssion.
,
~
Gateway Bui4din~
Parksnv Plan _
Y ~
sa
i~
~
` ^
~
~
QD
~
~
r' -
~
.
~ ~ ~ k ~
\ ti^ `~M1
, G
a
~
Z ,i ~y 7k
r + ~ ~
~
+
y~.av~~~m~'+~~aa
. _.....~'n
'L .
O =
~y t
g6 ~ %
~Q w
£n $
~Sq
~b
C~ .
<S
~ ~ • ~ .
V.`;. \ ~ ~\~\l\,~ . 1'~„L•
~E~ V A., A`~~ I
p ~
~ ~ ~ '~~V ~ ~ ~ V~~ ~ ~ ~ ? .
~ • ~~.~4~~~~~\ \
~
qy L--j
. ~
,
' ~ ~ w -
N 6
O .d~ y y •~t y ~
v
N ~~3q
.j
eu~
r mo~e.aaaiuw~+, ..r+.f~`owsc,r~o«ie~. .
j
Attac'hment: E -
~
Gafeway Building
Amended Parking Illlanagement Plan
~
~
Prepared by Timberline Commercial Real Estate
April 8, 2004
~
~ 1. General Overview
This plan is infended to provide a general guide for how parking will be
managed at the Gateway 8uifding. The uses contemplafied for the building
include officelcammercial uses, residentiaf Gondominiums, and parking
space condominium units. The parking plar, may need to be amencfed
fram time-to-time to allow the management of the building to meei the
needs af potential bui9d"rng users.
2. Exasting Parking Conditions
fihe parking for the Gateway Building is focated on three levels af the parking
garage containing 93 parking spaces, as shown Qn the Vail Gatewoy
condaminium pla#. Forty-two of the parlcing spaces, as orfginally
constructed, are tandern parkang spaces.
3. Parking by Use
• OfficelCommercial Use - 63 spaces
0 26 of the tandem spaces wifl be vsed by the office employees
within the building. Office space employees wdll have
designated spaces and employees will be required to
coord6nate with afficemates oro the use of the spaces. Tandem
~ spaces wilf be assigned so that only emp9oyees of indiwiduaN
affice spaces wit6 be required to Goordinate with one anather.
0 21 of the non-tandem spaces will also be used by office andJor
cammerciaB err7playees.
0 6 tcrndern spaces and 10 non-tandem spaces will be a+railable
as general visitor parking spoces. This nvmber may be increased
or reduced fram time to time depending on how the need fior
visitor parking is experienced,
o Office paricing spaces may be made available to other
allowable commercial uses as long as haurs of operatian da not
canflict (e.g., u restaurant serving in evening hours).
• Residential Uses - 13 s,paces
a 13 parking spaces (8 tandem spaces and 5 non-tandern) wile be
assigned to residential units.
o These spaces will remain in the ownership of the bvilding owner;
however, the residential users are guaranteed a)icense to use
their spaces.
• Parking Space Units - 13 spaces-
~ o 13 parking spaces will be made avaifable for individual sale.
Gateway BuildEng
Parking Management Plan _
o Parking space unit owners will be designated as members af the ~
condominium assocEation.
4. Location of Parlcing Spaces
The owner shall designate the location af parking spaces, subject ta the
provisions herein, in locations as designated on the approved condominium
plat. The intent is to allaw the owner the maximum flexibility vuith the function
of the parking area so that the owner will able to develop the mosfi effective
and effieient plan and is able to reaet to market conditions, changes in
building uses and users, and is able to meet #he needs af the visitors to the
properfy.
5. Governance and Inspection
The owner agrees to allow the Town of Vail to inspect the parking conditions
at anytime. If a nvisance dewelops from improper mar,agement af fihe
parking on this properiy, the awner agrees to address valid cancerns or
violations af the Town of Uai{ in a cooperative manner. The owner furfher
understands fihat the parking management plan is part of the conditional
use permit for the residential and parking club uses on the praperty and as
such has the ability to take acfion in the future if it discavers viQlafiions to the
eondEtianal use permit. Substantial changes to tne parking plan shafl be ~
reviewed and appraved by the Town of Vail staff.
6. Valet Parking
The owner may from time to time utilize a valet parking system for the
praperty in arder to create efficient use of parking and provide service to
building visifiars. Use af valet service mcry depend upon the ultima#e rnix of
office or commercial users an the property and the hours of operation of
~ certain uses. In na case vviEl veh%cles be Walet parked aff-site or will such volet
parking interfere with the ability to gain adequate access to the site.
~
Gateway Building
Parking Management Pian _
A
~
~
~ a
, 9 %,J llj ~y~ • ~ E ~
4 =
~
, G ^
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
45
~
7 ~ ~ S$ y~ ~ ~ a
4j~ t y a "
l=
rI"'
y .
_ • ~ ~ -
~
•C~.~t ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 6 ~ • '~SQ 1 ~ ~~$€3 1i"S-__' • ~i ' , ~ 4 4
°
` ~ ; ~ lvY~ ~I , 5
q
¦ I
+ ^I +%i
. ~~y~ b~~l•__ ~ 'I .
Yr~ ~ ~ ~ I
i
~
Cy u ~
i
C.9 EL i ' L_ i '
' ~ ~ Ew-~ - - - -
: q ` ~
~
a~ ~ w
i
ao
~
:
o~
a ~j a c~
~
c
~
5 ° ~ o
C4 -
04
e'S
a3
N dm
$
~ b$
I
Attachrnent: G
~
~ TC?~N OF YAI "
7Hl5 ITENI MAY AFFECT YOl1R PRQiPERTY
PUBLIC NOTIGE
NOTIGE 1S FIEREBY GIVEN #hat the Planning and Enuironmen#ai Commissian af the Town af
Vaif will hofd apublic heaiing in accordance with Section 12-3-6, lfail Town Cade, on April 12,
2004, at 2:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Buiiding, in consideratian of:
A request for final review of a variance pursuant to Sec#ion 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
fQ allow for a new primary/secondary residence to encroach into the frant and side setbacks and
a variance fram Chapter 10, 4fF-street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Gode, to aflow for
required parking to be located witnin the public right-of-way, located at 2830 Basingdale
BIvdJLot 5, B[ock 9, Vail lntermountain, and setting for#h de#aiis in regard thereto.
Applicant: W.L. Broer Construction
Planner: Matt Gennett
A request for a minor exterior alferatian pursuant #o Sectian 12-713-7, Exteriar AEterations or
Modificatians, Vail Town Code, to aflow for a eommercial addition to the Slifer 8uilding, located
at 230 Bridge 5#reetlLot B, Biock 5, Vail VilEage 15t Filing, and setting forth detaiEs in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Slifer Builciing, LLC
Pianner: Warren Campbell
~ A request for a conditioraal use permat pursuant to Section 12-16, Conditional Use Permits, VaiG
Town Cocfe, to allow for atemporary seasanal structure within the Lianshead Mixed Use 1 zane
district, located at 715 West Lionshead CirclefLots 4 & 7, B[ock 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing and
Lots C& a, Morcus Subdivision, and setting farth details in regard #hereto.
Applicant: Vail Corparatian; represented by Mauriello Pfanning Group
Planner: Warren Campbell
A request for conditianal use permit pursuant #o Sec#aon 12-7E-4, Conditianal Uses, Vail Town
Code, for an amendment to the existing priva#e club (i.e. parEcing club) conditional use permit,
located a# 12 Vail Road (Vail Gateway)/Lots N& 0, Block 5D, Vail Village 15t Filing, and setting
#or details in regard theretv.
Applicant: Vail Gateway Plaza Condaminium Association, lnc., represented by Greg
Gastineau
PCanner: Bil! Gibson
A request for a variance fram Section 12-21-14, Restrictians In Specific Zones On Excess6ve
Slopes, Vail Town Code, to allow far #he construction of driveways and surFace parlcing in exeess
of 10% of the total site area, lacated at 238$ Garmisch DrivelLot J, Blaclc G, Vail Das Schone
2 nd Filitlg, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Snow Now, LLC
Planner: V1larren CarnpbeC!
A request for a work session to present an averview of the proposed redeveiapment pEans for the
Lionshead Core Site Hatel, located at 675 Lianshead Pfacel(a complete legal description of the
proposed developrrrent site is available at the Tawn of Vail Cornmunity Development Department upon
~ request), and setting for details in regard thereto,
Applicant: Vail Corparatiran
Planner: George Ruther
The applications and information abou# the proposafs are availablefor pubCic inspectian during Tegular
office haurs at the 7own of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend project orientatian and the site visits fhat precede the pUblic hearing in the '
7own af Vaii Community Develapment De,par#ment, Piease caH (970) 479-2138 for additianal
informatian.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notificatian. Please call ~
(970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for inforrnation. i
I
Published March 26, 2004, in the Vail Daily. i
I
I
I
~
I
, -w
- ~h
!
I
TIMf3ERLINE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
~
February 23, 2004
Bill Gibson
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Vail Gateway Plaza Condominiumnns
Praposed Condo Map Amendment
Deas Bili;
The following is a iist of the ad}acent property owners as required by aur application:
1. Village Inn Plaza Condominiums - Phase 1
c/o Slifer Management
143 E. Meadow Drive, #360
Vail, CO $1657
2. Vi9lage Inn Plaza Condorrainiums - Phase 2
~ clo Slifer Management
143 E. Meadow Drive, #360
Vail, CO 81657
3. Village Inn Plaza Condominiums - Phase 3 P
c/o 9osef'Staufer 100 E. Meadow Drtve, #31
Vail, CO 81657
4. Village lnn Plaza Condominiums - Phase 5
c/o ]asef Staufer
100 C. Meadow Drive, #31
Vail, CO 81657. 5. Alpine Ventures Inc_, dba Alpine Standard
Jeff Maelientine
28 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
b. 9 Vail Road
Holiday House Condominiuni Assaciation
P.O. Box 5733
Vail, CC? 8165$
~
12 VAIL ROAU. S[JTTE 600 Va1IL, CQ 81657
370-476-1464 970-476-1986 FAX
l
.
Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium Assoc.
12 Vail Road, Suite 600
Vail, CO 81657
. i
~ I
I
~
Coiorado I)epartment af Tran.spartation "
4241 E. Arlcansas Ave., Room 277
Denver, CQ 80222 ~
I . . . . . ~ . ~ . "
. .
. ~
.
. .
. .
. . . . .
. . , >
. . . . .
. , .
. .
a
~ MEnnoRaraounn
TO: Planning and Enwironmentai Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: Apri1 12, 2004
SUBJECT: A request for a variance from Section 12-21-14E(2), RestrictiQns In
Specific Zanes Qn Excessirre Slopes, Vail Town Code, to allow for the
construction of driveways and surface parking in excess af 10°/4 of the
total site area, IaGated at 2388 Garmisch Drive/Lot 9, Black G, Vail Das
Schone 2"d Filing.
Applicant: Snow Now, LLC, represented by Greg Amsden
Planner: V1larren Carnpbell
l. SUMMARY
The applicant, Snow Now, LLC, represented by Greg Amsden, is requestirog a
variance frnm Section 12-21-14E(2), Restrictions In Specifoe Zones Ort Excessive
Slopes, Vaif Town Cade, ta allow for the consiructian o# driveways and surface
~ parking in excess of 10% of the #otal site area, lacated at 2388 Garmisch Drive
(Attachment A). The applican# received approval of this request from the
Pianning and Environrnental Commission on July 28, 20{}3, w`rth one condition.
That condition stated:
The applicant shalf submit ta fhe Community Development flepartmerrt a
copy of an executed access easement with ihe awners vf Lats 8 and 101,
Vai! Das Schone Filirrg 2, prior to the issuance af a 6uilding permit.
The applicant has worked aver the past r+ine rnanths to meet the requirements of
this conditian. The applicant has been able to get all praperty awners except for
the owners af the duplex on Lot 8 to agree to an access easement agreement.
The applicanf is returning to the Planning and Environmental Commission ta ask
that the candition of approual be rernoved.
8ased upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community DeveEopment Departmen#
recommends that the Planning and EnWironmental Commission deny this
varianee request ta remoue the eondition of appraval from July 28, 2003,
approval af this variance with ane condition subject ta the findings noted in
Sectian IK of this memorandum. Denial of this request affirms the Planning and
Environmental Cornmission's decisian firom July 28, 2003.
II. DESGRIPTEC)N OF REQl1EST
~ The applicant has been approWed by both the Planning and Enuironmental
Comrnissian and the Design Review Board to construct a new primarylsecondary
1 _
.
residence at 2388 Garmisch Drive. The property has steep existing grades arad is ~
currently undevelaped. An existing driveway on the site currently pravides
access to the adjoining properties located both to the west and east af this site
(i.e. lots Lat S and 10, Bfock G, Vail L7as Schone 2"d Filing). The existing
driveway is 5,635 sq. ft, in area (26% af the lat area). The adjoirting Lots 8 and
10 were both developed under Eagle Gaunty jurisdiction, later annexed into the
Town of Vail, and are currently fegally non-conforming in regard to many of Vail's
develaprnent standards. The existing driveway was constructed withaut farmal
easement agreements granting the adjoining properties access through this site.
On July 28, 2003, the applicant propased to make improvements to the existing
driveway to bring the driveway into conformance with Town of Vail engineering
standards. The applicant also proposed to grant easements to the adjoining Lots
8 and 10 far access through Lot 9. The applicant also praposed ta construct a
new primarylsecondar}+ residence on this site and pro?aide a total af three new
surface parking spaces. The tptal area of the proposed driveway and the new
surface parking spaces was 6,486 sq. ft. (30% of the tatal site area). This site
has exis#ing gracies in excess of 30% and is therefore subject to the provisions af
Section 12-21-14 (RESTRICTIONS IN SPECIFIC ZQNES ON EXCESSIVE
SLQPES), Vaif Town CQde. Section 12-21-14; Vail Town Gode, requires that (in
part) :
lVot rnore than ten percent (10f) of the totaf srte area may be cavered by
driveways and surface parking.
Section 12-21-14, ldail Town Code, lirriits the arnount of drivev+ray and parking ~
area on this site to 2,149 sq. ft. (10%o). The existing driveway providing access ta
Lots 8 and 10 is 5,635 sq. ft. in area (26°!a of the total site area~. Therefore, even
though Lot 9 is currently undeveloped, i# is non-canforming in regard to the
driveway and surface parking area requirements of Section 12-21-14, Vaal Town
Code. The applicant fiad a variance approved on July 28, 2003, which allowed
an increase in the non-conformity of this site by allowing improvements ta the
existing driveway and construction of three new surface parkang spaces for a
tatal area of 6,48E sq. ft. (30% of the total site area). The candition of approvai
stated:
The applicant shall submit to the Communrty fleveloprrrent Department a
copy of en executed access easement with the owners vf tats 8 and 10,
Vail Das SchoRe Filing 2, prfor to the issuance of a bUilding permit_
The applicant has made attempts to ccamply with this conditian of approvaf. After
nbne months of working with the adjacent property owners the applicant has been
able to get the owners of Lots 6, 7, 9, and 10 to agree to an access easement
agreement. 7he applicant has not been able ta reach an agreement with the
owners of the cEuplex oer Lot 8. Lot 8 contains the sauth western portion of the
approued driveuvay curve heading to the east which wilf service Lats 9 and 10.
Therefare, the applicant is returning before the Planning and Environmental
Commisston to ask that the candition of approval fram July 2$, 2003, be
removed. A copy of a letter from the applicant dated March 15, 2004, which ~
describes in greater detail the applicant's request, has been attached fQr
reference (Attachment B). A map depicting the easement proposed by the
2 _
applicant which dispMays the small area for which an agreement has not been
~ reached is included for referance (Attachrnent C).
IIE. BAGKGROUND
• This property was annexed inta the Town df Vail by Ordinanee No. 26 of
1986.
• On Jufy 2$, 2003, the Planning and Environmental Cornmissiorr appraved
the applicant's variance ta increase the area of the driveway on the site.
• On September 3, 2003, fhe Design Review Board approved the applicant's
proposal.
IV. RQLES OF REVIEWING BC?D1E5
Qrder of Review: Generally, applications wilf be reviewed first by the
Planning and Environmental Corr,mission for acceptability of use and then by the
Design ReWiew Board for compliance of proposecl buildings and siie planning.
Planning and Environmental Commission:
Action: The Planning and Environrnental Commission is responsible for final
approval/denia7fappraval with conditions of conditional use permits and
variances.
The Planning and Environrnenial Commission is respansib4e for
~ evaluating a praposal for;
1. Ftelationship ancf irnpact of the use on devefapment objectives o# the
Town.
2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schaols, parks and recrea#ian facilities,
and other public faciiities and public facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular referenee to congesfian, automotive
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and remflval of snow from the streets and parking areas.
4. Effect upon the character af the area in wh`rch the proposed use is to
be locatecf, including the scaIe and bulk of the proposed use in refation to
surrounding uses.
5. Such other factors and crrteria as the Cammission deerns applicable to
the proposed use.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an
environmental impac# repart is required by Chapter 12 of this Title.
Gonfnrmance with development standards of zone district
~ Lat area
Setbacks
3
.
Buiiding Height ~
Qensi#y
~'aRFA ~
Site caverage ~
Landscape area ;
Parking and loading
Mitigation of development impacts
;
~
Design Review Board: ~
Action: The Design Fteview Board has h1D review authority on a conditional use ~
permit or variance, but musi review any accompanying Design Review Board
application.
Town Council:
Ac#ions Qf Design Review Board or Planning and Environmental Commission
may be appealed to the Town Councdl or by the Tawn Gouncil. Town Council
j
evaluates whether ar not the Planning and Environmental Commissian ar Design ~
Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphald with j
modificatians, or overturn the baard's decision.
Staff:
The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are pravided ;
and pEans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulatians. The i
staff also advises the app'icant as to campliance with the design guidelines.
Staff pravides a staff rnemorandum containing background on the property and ~
provides a staff ewaluation af the project with respect to the required criferia anci
findings, and a recommendation an approval, approval with conditions, or denial.
Staff also faciiitates the review process.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING D(}CUMENTS
,
Staff believes that the following proaisions of the Vail Town Code are reEevant ta
the review of this proposal:
TITLE 12: ZONING REGULATIDNS
Chapter 12-6D: Two-Family Primaryl5ecandary Residential (PS) ,
Distriet (in part) '
12-6C7- 1: PURPOSE: I
7he twcr-farrrily primary/secondary residential district rs intended fQ ~
prvvide sites for single-family residentlal uses ar two-family residential ~
uses rn vuhich orre unir is a larger primary residence and the secand unrt
is a smaller caretaker apartment, together with such public facilifres as
may apprapriately 6e locafed in the same district. The hvo-family
primary/seGOndary resrdentral district is intended io errsure adequate light,
air, privacy and open space for each dweJling, commensurate with srngfe-
family and tvvo-family oecupancy, and fo rnaintain the desirable residerrfia! ~
qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site develQpment
standards.
4
~ Ghap#er 12-17: Variances (in part)
12-17- 7: Purpose:
A. Reasans For Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such
practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hara'shrps inconsrstent with
the abjectives a# fhis fitle as wauld result fram strict or literal r`nterprefation
and enforcement, variances fram certairr regulatrons may be granted. A
pracfical dffficulty or urrnecessary physical hardship may result frarrr the
size, shape, or dimensions of a site ar fhe locatian af existirrg strucfures
thereon; from topographic or physical conditians on fhe site or in the
imrraediate vrcinity; or frQm other physical llmitations, street !c?eations or
corrditions in the imrrrediate vicinity. Cost or inconverrience to the
applicanf of sfrfct or literal compliance wrth a regulation shall nnt be a
reasan for grantrng a variance.
B. Devefopment Standards Excepfed: Variances rrray be granted only
with respect to the develQpment sfandards prescribed for each district,
including Iot area and site dimensions, sef6acks, distances between
burldings, height, density control, building ,bulk control, site coverage,
usable open space, landscaping and site develapment, and parking arrd
loading requirements; or with respect to the provisiorrs of chapter 11 of
this title, gouerning physical develapment on a site.
~ Chapter 12-21: Hazard Regulations (in part)
12-21-1: PURPOSE:
The purpose of this Gha,ofer is to heip protect the inhabitants of the Tawn
from dangers relating to developmenf of flood plarrrs, avalanche paths,
steep sfapes and geologically sensitive areas; to regulate the use of land
areas which rrray be subjeer to flooding and avalanche or which may 6e
geologicafly sensitive; and further to regulate development on steep
slapes; fo protect the economrc and praperty values ot the Town, to
protect the aesthefic and recreational values and natural resoUrces of the
Tawn, which are sametimes assoclated with f1oad plains, avalanche
areas and areas of geolagical sensifivity and slopes; to mr'rtimize damage
[o public facilitres and utr'lities and minimfze the need for relief in cleanup
operations; to give notrce fo the public of eertarn areas within the Town
where fJood plarns, avalanche areas and areas of geologre sensitivify
exist; and fa promote the general public health, safety and welfare.
12-21-14: RESTRICTlONS !N SPECIFlC ZONES O1V EXGESSIVE
SL(7PES:
The foJlowrng addrtional special restrictrorrs or requiremenfs shafl apply to
development on any !ot rn a hillside residential, srngfe-farnily residenfial,
twn-famfly resrdentfal ar two-tamily prlmary/secondary residentxal zone
dtstrict where the average slope of [he site beneath the exfstirrg or
proposed structure and parking area is rn excess of thfrty percent
(30%):.. .
~
S
E. Site cnverage as it pertains to this chapter, as ,permitted 6y ~
secfions 12-6A-9, 12-6B-9, 12-6C-9 and 72-6D-9 of this title, is
amended as fallows:
i. Not more than fifteen percent (15%) of the site area may 6e
cavered by buildirrgs, except in con1unction with a[ype f ernployee
housirrg unit in accordance with chapter 13 of this title, in which
case not more than hventy percent (20%) of the site area may be
covered by buildings; and
2. Not more fhan #en percent (7a°l~) of i'he i?otaf site area may
be covered by driveways and surface parking,
Vl. SITE ANALYSIS
Lot Area: 21,492 sq. ft. (0.49 acres)
Zoning: Two-Family PrirtaarylSecondary Residentaal (PIS)
Land Use P[an DesignatiQn: Medium Density Residential
Current Land Use: llndevelaped
Development Standard Aelorrved/Required Proposed
Setbacks_
Front: 20 ft. >20 ft.
Sides: 15 ft. / 15 ft. >15 ft_ />15 ft.
Rear: 15 ft. >15 ft, ~
Building Height: matic. 33 ft. (slope)130 ft,(flat) <33 ft,
Density: 2 units + 1 Type II EHU 2units
GRFA: 5,249 sq,ft. 4,637 sq.ft.
Site Coverage: 3,223 sq.ft. (3 5°l0) 3,035 sq.ft. (14°1a)
Landscape Area: 12,896 sq.ft. (60%) 13,000 sq.ft. (6p%a)
Parking: Primary Unit 3 spaces 4 spaces (2 surface)
Secondary Unit 3 spaces 3 spaces (1 surface)
1lII. SURRQUNDiNG LAND USES AND ZONING
Land Use Zonina
North: Low-Density Residential Two-Famoly Frirrzary/8econdary
South: L.ow-C]ensity Residential Two-Family PrimarylSecondary
East: Nledium-Density Residential Two-Family Primary/Secondary
West: Medium-Density Residentiao Two-Family Primary/Secondary
~
6
.
~ Vifl. ~CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Consideration oi Factors Repardinp Variances:
1. The relationship of the requested variaRCe to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
The approved driveway and parking areas will accommodate
vehicular access and parking for this site and provide access to
Lots 8 and 10. Staff believed that the approved dreveway and
parking areas are in keeping with the character of the
neighborhood and that the applicant's approved amprauements to
the existing driveway will be benefic6al to the existing and potential
uses arad structures on the adjoinirog Lots $ and 10_ Additionally,
Statf believed that rnaintaining access to Lats 8, 9, and 10 through
the existong, eommon driveway will create less site disturbance
than requiring each property to construct aseparate driveway
cannection to Garmisch Drive.
As this property and the neighboring properties never had a forrnal
access easement agreement the Town required the appldcant to
estabkish a legally recorded access agreement for Lots 8, 9, and
10. The applicant has prapased an access easement agreement
which includes Lots 6, 7, 9, and 10. If recQrded it wouBd
~ establish easements for alf properties across all the lots making
the existing situation legal. The applicant has currently not been
able to reach agreement with the owners of the duplex on Lot 8. ft
is because of this laek of agreemen# that the applQCant is retuming
befare the Planning and Environmental Cornmission to have the
conditian of approua9 from July 28, 2003, removed.
Staff firmly believes that fhe applicant must have an access
easement in place for al9 properties that the approveti driveway
wilf cross and be imprawed upon. 7o not have an sasement in
place would meare that at any point in the future that any owner
not included as a par# of the access easement could limit access
to neighboring property owners.
2. The degree to which relie# from the strict and literal
interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is
necessary to achieve campatibility and uniforrnity of
treatment amang sites in the vicinity or #o attsin the
cabjectives of this title without a grant 4f special privifege.
Staff does not beJieve that the topography of the site constitutes
an extraordinary circumstance or exceptional condition. C7ther
properties in the Two-Farrnify Primary/ iecondary (PfS) District with
similar topagraphic conditians have been successfully developed
withaud variances.
~
7 _
r
However, staff believed the presence of the existing driveway on ~
this site that provides access #a two adjoining properties is an
extraordinary circumstance and exceptianal conditian. Staff aEso i
believed the applicant requested the minimum amount af relief
from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of the
zoning regulations necessary ta achieve compatdbility and
unEformity among sites in the vicinity and within the Two-Family
PrimarylSecondary Residential (P/S) District. Therefore, Staff did
not believe this proposal would canstitute a grant of special
privi{ege.
3. The effect af the requested variance an light and air,
distribution of papulation, transpartat#on and traffic faciiities,
public facilities and utilities, and public safety. ,
I
Staff believed that this variance will facilitate the applicant's !
approved improvements to the existing driveway that will improve
both traffic ffow and public safety on Lots 8, 9, and 10 and an
Garmisch Drive.
Staff did not believe that the propased uariance would have a
significant negative impact on light and air, distribvtian af
popuEation, pubfic facilities, and utilities.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commissian deems ~
appiicahle to the proposed variance.
B. The Planninp and _EnvEronmental Commission shall make the fallbwinq
findinas befare qrantinq a Wariance:
1. That the granting of the variance will nat constitute a grant af
special privilege inconsistent with the limitatians an other
properties classified in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrirnental to the „
public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or mare of the follouving
reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enfarcement of the
specified regulatian would result in practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptians or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the same site of the uariance that
do not apply generally ta ather properties in the same ~
zone.
8
~ c. The strdct interpretation or entorcement of the specified
reguEation would deprive the applicant of privileges
enjoyed by the owners of ather praperties in the same
district.
iX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Depariment recommends that the Planning and
Environmental Commissian cieny this variance request to rernove the condit`ron
of approval from Ju9y 28, 2003, from Section 12-21-14E(2), Restrictions In
Specific Zones Qrc Excessive Slapes, Vail Town Code, to alfow for the
constructian of driveways and surface parking in excess of 10% of the tatal site
area, located at 2388 Garmisch Drive/Lot 9, Block G, Vail Das Schone 2"d Filing.
Qenial of this request affirms the Planning and Environmental Commission's
decision from July 28, 2003. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review af
the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony
presented, subject to the fol6owing findings:
1. That the granfing o# the uariarace wull constitute a granting of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations ort othrer proper#ies classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variarrce will be detrimentaf to the public health,
safety, or welfare, ar materially injurious to properties or improvements in
~ the vicinity.
3. Yhe strict literal in4erpretation Qr enforcement of the spec9fed regulation
would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsis#ent with the objectives of this title.
4. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified reguiation would
nat deprive the app6icant of privileges enjoyed by the owners a# other
properties in the same distriet.
X. ATTACHMEMTS
A_ Vicinity Map
B. Appl%cant's Le4ter af Request
C. Map depicling easement
D. Public Hearing Notice
~
9
- - -
EtSl'~' .7q g ' ':.~.T f ~ zv _ ~
a - J p~ "
~~l , ' ~ ~ P~~~~'' ~ f _
' 4
'0.=~ ,~i rf A° *0`.
g. ~ K rb~ c i z[ ~iy C .
a ~ rs ~ ~ "
g ~ 1~ ~`~R- 7 .S f ~ P ; f k 'S f'Y ~ ~
.
" - - ~ I 0
~ \ ~~;y: ',AS L Z ' ~
k , ~ . _ s3k . r i 3R~'+.~1 .d ~ k:", ;r
q . ~ «F .~b " Y ~ ~L ~d° ~ ~ Y.
y €
k E °
: ' t ~ '
ma r`.~~` . . ~ e 4 ~~a~ ~ ~ ~ ~
`F ,~y.. 3^ n m~ f dY a-
" ~ Y~~1 ""a - ~.9,» . 1~.«
4 ( sa' ~ ~ :k , r 1~ + . , [y~''vN .
~`w ;`~k H i} Siy ~ 3~ ~~5"
kS ~o- ~ k r ~ . . b . . /
~ .°~'~;.*~r..' =,r^5i.. . ~~,.A ' vY'~ 'i
.oe' ~ r,y'' . / - , ,f,~ j .,x:' F y, 'k
~ . , , f ~ 4 . 'rY ~"r i. ~ i. "`Vi
g ~ . ,y ,d, ~ p~g ~",y ' = 3 b
c ! 4 ~ +y r
~ ' ~ y'~ ~ ~ t z
~ .«y~"y h f I ; ~r ~I~~~~ul ~:~s,~
T -y,f ~ ~I~. ~ . £ . , .
~s r,~.y'", f a t J _`V ''~4
~ y ~ t _ : x ~,~t x ' ~
; [~"i"` ~ ' *i" ~r aY ° ,r Y s~~ P~k t r ~ F
w+l~+' # f ._„~i ~ ~ ' ~ ~ f ~i ~ s 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , • €
N 'i ~ 4 N~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ F C. Y ~ ' ~ 3 ?
L- I I Y *F:. I , 5 .f ' ~ J^ 1 .7
~ .w l@ e . "Y .
iF ~ . " ii ~ 1 r - i
~ ~ ' } "~L ~ ~ ~ , ~
~ 0 %
~y e~ t " i ~ a F 'c ~ °X` 4 e ~ ~ _
~ 'MtT Y h~ ¢h 5 4~ ftn' y
~x41 ~ J._ 'd
1
. • , W N p k ' i 1 t j~,'t
,1 ~
t-~';""' z - ~ ~ r ~
a
, x . :V '
~ ,
' ` a ~ - , ' ~ ' z
~
: ti ~
~ 1['° ~ , y ` ,
t t z,+~ -~e* ,
r~ 4; ` ~,"~'wr ~ -;S+~.a~ r r'C•
~ r~ ~ ~ ° ti ~ r~: ~ - - ~ ~ . a _ ~'9
k < ~ " r A -rt i
1~,. 4i c'' ~ ~
~.`q.~ . ' ti~'m ~y~t.!- , r ~ Y 't l''~r 4 ~ ~ ~
s` '-tV a.~ ~ 4 i . u ~t ",,i .f.~.
~ y ~ r
~ ' ~r :
rv ~ x ~°r
,1 -
a :z , ~1 ~O.r~ ` , " " ~ ~ ~a : 1
~ ~I^"1tr . A n- h ; +I
% y 0 y~ { i i F & ' f' ~x: t
~ ~'F
s~~4 k' r 5 l~ - , F " t . f•" 4 P , d a
~ ' ~ 4 . 3 ~ i~~ ~
~ ; ~ ~a ? ~ :
~ ~
~ ' ' t ~ ~ K
~ R x . , ¢ ~ , - ~ 'f` . ~ c :
~ ' : } S y~ i s:~ ""I "f,~, !g~ # :
L A 4 - ~ 4_'!N'Fry~:~,,, "6 $ 1 . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ : ~~0} ~ a , _~r ;
~ lJ . ~
~ ' ~ e~ r - ~.r~~ ,r ~ `V ~
,-.r"~ ~ E~ ~ `b F ~ , a
1~'."~4~~ . , y ' r
~ ` 1 ~ I . , v I'I ~ z~'' ~q ~,~,`a
- r 'L !~~°'s a , , t ~ t
s . 'r+ ~,r( 'w ,E+, ~ a"' . .
,4 'a. , ~ , s~y"`.~ ~
t ~ r xy f,(~~ c~w~F~a~~ :~a
~ ~ "~r.~:
? d'~~y ~~yn S ; L"t , v'p~ _ b_' ~ P I ' ~ tq~ y"+E
fi C E. ~ _ 1" ' f . .?tl
`5 " .t~ ~ ~ w.~+Y~~~~` ~ ) ~
~ ~ , ,
11
~2 ~ ~ ' ~ I
Y ~ ~ t 4 - ~ . I ~m' v„ +q
x e ~ ~ 4£ y, .x w ~ ~4d./, e~y .11 *h.. . v ~
t 3 ~t, J'4.1~y#~ '~'t
~ '~Y J7yr
~ ~ s - C 4 ~ ~ ~~o ~ 9«~fp_ : A ~:i~~-.
~T~•;C. ,y- ja . -i
4 ~ k d " ~1
-
e. k I j f~
~
s~ +
. ~ i
~ g ro4* ~
k z
. ~ . ~
- F ~ ~,d
~ , ~ , , p~
. , - , . , ~ .T
.A . -
.z3 ~ A+. a T * 4 . *`'°aY ~ ~ t
~
~ r - 's- F r _Y ~ r ~ ~s ° r ir~ -"f ' , - ` ~ ' ~d - y ~ '+~i q~ ~
I~.. ' , 'a , - , i ~ . . ~ 4 j ~
~ a ~ ,x ~ p ~ ' ~ ~ gy ~ _~-g, ~ 0
. .y
~F , y ~,,.~~,Y f ~ ;a 1.~ #.,r C"v- .
. `a ~g,y , e y . ~4 ,
r~ A . ~ a , i . ~ :
rh ,a ~ p a.,~..~,_.:......~....,...._. ,...,rj.~r,.~,.~....._..._i ~ fi r'~
w r g ` ~
,
~s N k r O
: r' K ' r^
; ; ~
kR ` Att achment: A ~ 6 f'~ ~
1,. N~ .
' 1 ` . ~,~p fi~s.Y f ~ ' ~4 t
~
. „
i °..r
, ~ -~.r '
d" . . ..;.r. ,.L~. ' • 5:+~,c ' ' .
Snawnow LLC ~
i
500 S. Frontage Road East, Suite 112
~ Vail, Colarado $1657 0
M3TCh 15, 2{)04
'Town of Vail PIannizig & Environmental Commission e1o Bill Gibson
75 South Frantage Road
Vail, CO. 81657
Re: Removal of a Condition on Variance granted for 238$ Garmisch Drive
{Lat 9, Block G, `Tail das Schone Filing Z}
Dear Bi1I:
Attached is a carnpleted apglication for an amendment ta the Planning and Environmental Commission's imperviaus (driveway) site coverage variance granted in ru1y 28, 2003 far the °
pr+operty located at 2388 Garmnisch Drive in West Vail.
I
~ The basis for the origirral variance was to improve the existing driveway on applica.nt's
property (used by 10 neighborin,g homeowners) to satisfy requirements of the Town of Vail
Public Works Department and the Fire Department. The FEC attached a condition ta the
vaxiance requiring the applicant to establish au easement fox all partions of the driveway, both
on and off the applicant's properiyy, beirzg used by adjacent property ouners (Buildings 1 and
2, Alpen Chalet Townhpuses, and Alpen Chalet Auplex).
TkZe apFlicant approached all the owners regarding this easement and, a,fter twelve months and e
nurnerous redrafts, is still unable to obtain rnutual agreement arnongst the 10 neighbaring
property owners. Several owners da not wis{i to sign any dvcument, regardfess of it's
eontent. The applicant has spent considerable time, money (legal fees and surweying casts),
and has had lost a$675,000 sales contract due to delays in start of construction. The buiiding
permit has been approved and has been ready for issua-nce since Deceznber, 2003.
Since the requirement far an easernent imposed by the PEC is not feasible, the applicant is
requesting removal af this candition. All itnprovements for ihe new driveway are located vn
the applicant's property except for a srnall, triangle-shaped parcel awned by Alpen Chalets
Duplex (See attached Exlzibit A autlining lacation of parcel). Applicant will indernrufy, defend
and hold harmless the Town of Vail, its representatives and emplayees against any claims,
demand.s, loss, damages, liability ar ather expense arising out af any actians taken by the
Town of Vail in approving any aspect of the applicant's proposed improvements.
~
Voice (970)-476-$610 arnsdenn.vail.z~et (970)-476-8637 Fax
Attachment: B
If you have any additional yuestians, don't hesitate to contact me at 476-861 a. Thank yau for ~
your time and consideration of this matter.
Sineerely,
AMS lAvelgpme , ln - Project Manager
Gre ~~en, President
Cc: Robcrt A. Rymer - Manager af Snownow LL.C
r
6
~
~
I
~
EXHIBIT A
RADws . t+a.W
~EtlEN f ~ 1Z~Cl oE.u = tsros•a,-
ARG o 39..72' PQINT OF
CliDR6 ~ 39.1$' FifGtNNIMC
BRG = N403015"E
' Lar 10
:
~ ~Dy,•
L ~
h
' S8~' ~O~ ry~
PAitT OF LOT 8
VNL Dh5 (SG16~PtE F1uNC N0. 2)
{REC. 0 710984)
'j
RADIUS = 732.00' tim'a9
D€3.7A - 2249'00`
ARC = 50.89' LOY g
CS#ORO~ - 50.3T' (FlNAL PLAT, A RE~BPiV~5E0N OF HANSOiV C7IALET
BFtC = N3T33'40'£ V1UL OAS SCMONE FRJTIC NQ 2)($6QK 848, PACE 56)
~
~
'h{4~~ ~Glt
nti 9(Aq'
.rry ~',~F44~ ,~F d`
r 0
4(~ 0,~
4y.
RADIUS - 1311)(' ? rkp. DE1TA F 2619'Oa' 'a~
ARC - 67.97
Ct1M - 61.43' ~
8RC - N39'42''~E
~ ?J
~
w4
, LOT 6
(gLOGH G, ~r~,
~1 rp' VaL OAS SCNONE FlLIPYC f1D. 3) ~~~1~{ •
(REG ~ 110984) ,
O~ w sc,u~ r- scr
CA"r-af fk~wc~ ~ fitrAneAf
~
VA[L SIiY HTG?i GONdqbUNlLlMS
(!AT 5) , 5HEET 2 OF 2
G01'e R211g2
' $UN@yl[lg, EI.C
953 South Frontaga Road wesk /a
Suiieiv6 Attachment. 1.i
Vall. CO 8t657
C970) 479'$69$. fex (47o) 477•-55
• ,~r ~x L`. :i rc~ „ ~
1 ~ 4 ~ . • : ecv? ' ` 1
~ ~ i g~l~4i A{~p
P-m
A°
r,,
' 1~~~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ,
~ FE~i~
~c..n
~ ~ • ~ .T .
~ ~t,D ~ ~ ~ i ~
~ v ~ ' . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
t ~ . . ~ . ~ . - _
_ ~ ~ - . : . _ ~ - ~ • ` ~ ~ • ~
~Jz~ y~ r. ~ r r' . ' , ~ - • ~
A yyy~~~ • `1 ~ r S r{ S~ ~ ~»y~ _n• . .K 1 ~ ' _ .
1[ ~ •A~ ~ • _ ~ ' ~ . 1 ~
t,
: ~;.u.. ~ , , : ~ . ; . • .
~ _ ~ ~ ° - . _ _ ~ , . . ~ . ~ _ - - ~
• :i~ ~ei.. _ . ~ _ ' ' • ` .
~...:i-. }•a_ _ ~r r• ' _ Jfy - • ~ :ri . _ :s . •ip ' ` -
x~- n*}^-... ' _ . . • . 'yJ s'. .J , . . '-•1 .
t y~ _ . ~ . :~N ....~.r~-- .-''1.~~"..:x~" 'S . . , _ } ~ • ~ ` .r
~ To~ VAI `
THIS 17EM MAY AFFECT YOL7R PROPERTI(
PUBLIC NOTICE
AlOTICE IS HERESY G11/EN that the Planning and Environrnental Commission of the To+rvn of
Vail will hold a public hearing in aceordance with Section 12-3-6, 1lail Town Code, on April 92,
2004, at 2:00 PM in the Tawn of Vail MunicipaC Buildirrg, in cansideration of:
A request for final review of a variance pursuant to Section 12-8D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
to allow for a new primaryfsecandary residence to encroach into the frant and side setbacks and
a variance fram Chapter 10, Off-s#reet Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, #o allaw for
required parlsing #o bE located within the public right-of-way, located at 2830 Basingdale
BIvd.ILot 5, Block 9, Vail Fntermauntain, and setting fortn details in regard thereto.
Applicant: W.L. Broer Constrvction
Planner: Matt Gennett
A request far a minar exterior alteration pursuan# to Section 12-7B-7, Exterior Alteration5 or
Madifications, Vail Tawn Code, to allnw for a commercial addition to the 5lifer Buiiding, located
at 230 Bridge Street/Lot B, Block 5, Vail Village lSt Filing, antf setting far#h details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Slifer Building, LL.C
Pfanner: Vllarren CampbeEl
A requesf for aconciitional use permit pursuant to Section 12-16, Canditionaf Use P'ermits, Vail
~ Town Code, to a6lc?w for a temporary seasonal structure within the Lionshead Mixed Use zane
district, located at 715 Wes# Lionshead CirclelLots 4 & 7, Slock 1, Vai! l.ionshead 3`d Fiiing and
Lots C& D, NloTCUS 5ubdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applican#. Vail Corparatian; represerrted by Maueiella Planning Group
Planner: Warrerr Carr7pbell
A request far conditionaf use permit pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town
Code, for an amendrnent to the existing private club (i.e. paTking club) conditional use permi#,
located at 12 Vail Road (Vail Gateway)fLots 6V & O„ B[ock 5D, Vaii Village 1st Filing, and seffing
far details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium Association, lnc., represeroted by Greg
Gastineau
Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a variance from SectiQn 12-21-14, Restricti9ns In Specific Zones On Excessive '
Slopes, Vai! Tawn Code, ta aIlow for the canstruction of driveways and surfaee parking in excess ~
of 10% of the totaE site area, located at 238$ Garmisch DrivelLot 9, Block G, Vail Das 5chone
2"d FiGng, and setting farth details in regard thereto.
AppEicant: Snaw Now, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
A request for a work sessiort ta present an over+riew of the proposed redevefcapment plans for the
Lionshead Core Site HQtel, located at 675 Lionshead Place/(a complete legal description of the
' prvposed develaprnen# site is available at the Town o# Vail Gommunity Oeuelapment Departrr3ent upon
~ request), and setting for details in regaEd thereto.
Applicanf: 1/ai! Corporation
Planner. George Ruther
The applications and information abc abEe for pubEic inspection during regular
Attachment: D -
affice haurs at the Town of Vail CommunitJi Developrraent Deparkmen#, 75 Sauth Frontage Road. The
pubEic is inrrited to at#end project orienta#ion and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Deuefopment Qepartment. Pkease call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign 1anguage inferpretation is avaflabCe upon request with 24-haur natificafion. Please call ~
(970) 479-2358, TeCephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Pubfished March 26, 2004, in the Vai! DaiCy.
i
i
l
~
~
, k
~
~
MEMoRANOUM
~
TC3: Planning and Enwiranmentaf Commission
FRf3M: Community Development Department
DATE: Apral 12, 2004
SUBJECT: A request far a work session to present an overview of the proposetf
redevelapment plans for the Lionshead Core Site Hotel, located at 675
Lionshesd P1ace, and setting forth detaiis in regard thereta. (A mvre
complete metes and baunds Isgal descriptian is available at the Town of
Vail Corrimunity Developmen# Department)
Appiicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: George Ruther
t, SUMMARY
The applicant, Vail Resorts Develapment Campany (VRDC), represented by .lay
Peterson, has requested a worksessian rneeting wFth the Planning &
Environmental Commission to present the proposed plans for Lionshead Gore
Site Hotel. The Ltonshead Core Site Hote1 project is the comprehensive
~ redevelopment of the Gondola Building„ ticket offices, and Sunbird Lodge uvhich
are loca#ed at the base of Vail Mountain in Lionshead. The redevelopment site is
proposed to be the locatian of a five-star Rock Resorts hotel with a new autdoor
public ice nnk as a rnain attraction. This new five-star hotel and outdoor ice rink i
is intended to renew the vitality and energy of the Lionshead. Ara improued skier
services facility, new retaii and commercial spaces, restaurants, coradominiums,
a skier club facility, a new skier bridge crossing Gore Cree9c, a pub4ic and private
loading and delivery facility, and the reconstruction of the Lionshead streetseape
aee a!I envisianed in the redeveiopment plan far the Lionshead Core Site Hatel.
This warltsessian meeting is the first of many meetings to be he[d aver the next
several months intending to facili#ate the development review process of the
development review applications. The Commission is not being asked to take
any fvrmal actians at this meeting,
If. DESCRlPTIC?N OF THE REQl1EST
The applicant, Vail Ftesorts Develflpment Campany (VE2DC), represented by Jay
Pe#erson, is requesting a worksession meeting with the Planning &
Environmental Commission to discuss the proposed plans tar the Lionshead
Core Site Hotel projec#. The purpose of this meeting is to aflow the applicant an
opportunity to present an overview of the proposed project and to pravide a brief
ov~rview and description of the developrnen# review applications #hat have been
~ subrnitted to facilitate the development of the Cvre Site.
1
She Lionshead Core Site Hotel project is the comprehensiwe redevelopment of ~
one of three primary portals to Vai! Mauntain and likely VaiB's Front Door, is
intended to create aworld-class arrival point and trans'rtion between Laonshead
and 1Jail Mauntain. The Lionshead Core Site Ho#el project includes the fvilowing
components:
Five-Star Hc?tel - A comprehensive redesign to construct anewv core hotel
cornprising 81 hotel rooms, 79 dwelling un'rts, Earge lobby area, lounge, spa
facility, meeting rooms, and other amenities necessary to operate a warld-class,
five-star hatef. A compEete set of reduced plans have been attached far
reference (Attachment A).
New Pedestruan Nlall - The Core Site Rroject includes roughly 22,000 square feet
of new retail space and 10,000 square feet of new restaurant area ?ocated along
the streef level of the hotel.
Public Outdoor Ice Rink - An outdoar public iee rinic is proposed and will pravide
a significant publFC benefit. The ice rink is a majpr component of the Lianshead
Redevelopment Master P6an which is intended to inject new life back into
Lionshead and create a pedestrian magraet for all of Lionshead.
Skier Services - A new skier serveces facilities fvtaling more than 3,500 square
feet in size is proposed and conueniently iocated at the base of Vail Mauntain.
Deliverv, Loading and_ Circulation - An entirely underground parkirrg, IQading,
and delivery facilfty comprised af 321 parkang spaces and 8 loading and delivery
~
bays,
~
A mQre complete deseription of the various camponents of the project is provided
in ,Attachment B. I
The Lionshead Core Site Hotel project proposal is comprised of fve (5) different
development review applicatians. Each ofi these appfications is needed to
facilitate fhe redevelaprrient praposal. The development applications inclGde the
fallowing:
• A major exterior alteration applicatian fflr the new hotei and
structuresn
• A Gonditional use perm'rt for the new meeting rooms;
• A cvnditionai use permit for "Jodge rooms or dvvelling units"
[ocated on the graund-Eevel of a building;
• A conditional usE permit for "retail/restaurants" bcated an the
second floor of the building; and
• A conditiQnal use permit for a°private skrer club'°.
The staff and applicanf are requestJng thaf the Commission I1StER fo a
presenfation on the project praposal and provide any initial direction the
Commissianers ;rttay have at fhis fime.
~
2
. • ' } ~
IIL BACKGROUND
~ The develapment site is generally focated in the center of the Lians Commercial
Care Area south of the Lifthouse and L.andmark Condornuiniums, east o#
Lionshead Center Condominiums and west of the Montaneros and Lions Square
North Condominiums. A vicinity map has been attached f4r fefBfEf1Ce
(Attachrraer+t C)_ The cambined total area 4f the Lianshead Core Site Hotel
development site is appraximately 4.67 acres in size.
EV. RQLES OF THE REVIEW[NG BOARDS
The purpose of this section of the mernorandum is to clarify the responsibiEities af
the Design Review Board, Pfanrting & Environmental Commission, Town
Gouncil, and staff on the varivus applications submitted on behalf of VaiE Resorts
Develvpment Company.
A. Exterior AlterationfModification in the Lionshead Mixea-Use I
zane district
Order of Rsview: Generally, applicatians will be reviewed first by the
Planning and Environmental Commission #ar impacts of useldevelopment
and then 6y the DeSign Review Board for compliance of proposed
buildings and site planning.
~ Planning and Environmental Commission:
Action: The Planning and Environmental Gommission is respansibie for
final approvallden`ral of a Magor/Minor Exteriar Afteration. 7'he Planning
and Environmental Corrtmission sFiall review the proposal for campliance .
with the adopted criteria. The Plarrning and Environmental Commissian"s
approval "shaff consti#ute apprava6 of the basic form and location of
improvements including siting, bu6lding se8backs, height, buifding bulk and
mass, si#e improvements and landscaping.n
Desrgrr Review Board:
Actian: The Design Review Board has no review author~ity on a Major or
Minar Exterior A7teration, but must review any accompanying Design
Review Board application.
Sfaff.-
The staff is respansible for ensuring #hat all submittal requirements are
provicied and plans conform to the technical reguiremen#s of the Zoning
Regulations. The staff alsa advises the applicant as to compliance with
the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing
background on the property and prQVides a staff eualuation of the project
with respect to the requiTed criteria and findings, and a recommendation
on approval, appraval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the
eewiew process.
~
i
I
~ o
_ ;
Town Gouncil:
Actions of Qesign Review Board or Planning and Environmental ~
Commission may be appealed to the Town Council or by the Town
Cauncil. Town Council evafuates whether or nat the Planning and
Enviranmen#al Commission or Qesign Review Board erred with aQprovals
or denials and can uphold, uphold wiih modifications, or overkurn the
laoard's cEecisian.
B. Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
Order of Review: Generally, applications wifl be reviewed first by the
Planning and Environmental Commission for acceptability of use and then
by the Design Review Board for campliance of propased bui9dings and
site planning.
Planning and Envrrorrmental Commissian;
Action: The PEanning and Environmental Commission is respQnsible for
fnal approvaUdeniai af CUP. The f'lanning and Enviranmental
Commission shaU revaew the requ€:st for eornpliance with the adopted
conditional use permit criter'ra and make findings of fact with regarti to the
project°s compliance.
Design Review Baard:
Action: The Design Review Board has nfl review authority on a CUP, but
rnust review any accompanying Design Review Baard application. ~
Sfaff.-
The staff is respbnsibie for ensuring that alf submittal requirernents are
provided and plans canform to the teGhnical requirements of the Zaning
Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with
the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing
backgraund on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project
with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation
on approval, approval with canditions, ar denial. Staff also facilitates the
review process. -
7own Covncil:
Actians of Design Review Baard or Planning and Enviranmental
Commission may be appealed to the Town Cauncil ar by the Tor,vn
Council. 7'own CouncEl evaluates whether or not the Planning and
Environrrrental Commission or Design Review Board erred with approvals
ar denials and can uphold, uplaald with madifications, or overturn the
board's decision.
V. APPLICABLE PLAMNIMG DQCUMENTS
TitRe 12, Zoninq 'ftequlations, Vail Town Code
12-71-1 Lionshead Mixed Use1 (LMU-'!) DistrECt (in part) ~
4
12-7x-1: PuRPosE:
~ The Lionshead Mixeaf Use 1 Distrrct is intended to provide sites for a mixture of
mulfiple-famify dwellings, Ioa'ges, hotels, fractional fee CIu6s, fime shares, lodge
dwelJing units, resfaurarrts, offices, skier services, and cammercial
establishmenfs in a clustered, unified developrnent. Lionshead Mixed Use ?
District, in accordance wvith fhe Lionshead fZedevelopment 1Vlasfer Plarr, rs
infended to ensure adequate light, arr, open space and other amenr'ties
appropriate to fhe permitted types of buildings arrd uses and ta marrrfain the
desirable qualifies of the flisfrict by establishing appropriafe site developmenf
standards. This Disfrrcf is meant to encourage and provide irrcenfives for
redevelopment in accordance with fhe Lr`onshead Redevelopment Masfer Plan.
This Zone Drsfricf was specificafly develaped to provide incenfives for pro,aerties
fp redevelap. 7"he ulfimate goal of rhese rrrcenfives is to create an econornically
uibraRt lodging, housing, and commercial core area. The rncentives in this Zone
Disfrict incJude rncreases rn allowable gross residentlal floor area, burlding heigh#,
and derrsity over the prevrously established zoning rn the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan study area. The primary goa1 nf the rncentives ls to
create economic condltions favorable to inducing prlvafe redevelopmenf
consisfenf with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Pfarr. Addrtronally, the
ineenfives are creafed fQ help frnance publrc off-sife improvemenfs adjacerrt to
redeveloprrrent projects. With any develo,prnenf/redevelopment proposal taking
advanfage nf the ineenfrves created hereirr, the following amenrties will be
evafuated: sfreetscape improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access, publrc pfaza
redevelopment, public art, roadway improvements, ancl similar improvemenfs.
~ 12-7H'-5-- CONDITIONAL LISES; GENLRALLY (QN ALL LEVELS OF A
BUILDING Cf2 OUTSlDE C1F A BUILDI,NG):
The followirtg conditionaf uses shall be pertlaitfed, subjecf ta issuance of a
condifional use permit in accordance with the pravisrorrs of Chapter 16 of fhis
Title:
Bed and breakfasf as furtherregcrlated by Sectiorr 12-14-78 of fhis Title.
Brevv pubs.
Coin-operated IaurrdriES.
Commercial sfarage.
Private oufdoor recreatron facr`lities, as a prrmary use.
Publrc buildings, grounds, and facilifies.
Pu61ic or private parking lots.
Public park and recreation facilities.
Public ufility and pubfic service uses.
Single-famrly and two-family residenfial dwellings.
Ski Irfts and faws.
Television stations.
Additional uses determined to 6e similar to caradrtionaC uses described in this
subsecfion, in accordance wifh fhe provisions Qf Section 12-3-4 of this Title.
12-7H-7: ESCTERIORALTERATIONS C7R MOD1FlCAT1ONS_
A. Revrew Required: The construetion af a new buifdrng rar the
alrerafian of an existing buildrng thaf is rrof a mafor ex#erior alferatton
~ as described in subsectron B of this section shall be revlewed by fhe
desigra review board" in accordance wlth chapter 11 of this tlfle.
5
.
9_ Su6mlttal 1#ems Regtrired: The submittal items required for a ~
project that is rtat a major exterior alteration shall be p!rovided in
accordance vvith section 92-11-4 of this title.
B. Majar Exterior Alferation.' 7`he construction of a rrew building or the
alferation of an extstirtg buifding which ad'ds additional dwelling
unifs, accammodafio» units, fracffonal fee cfub units, time share
unifs, arry proJect whlch adds more fhan one thausand (7, 000)
square feef of commercral floor area or common space, or any
projecf vvhieh has substantral off sife impacfs (as defermirrcd by the
admr'nrsfratar) sha11 be revfewed by the planning and errvironmerrtal
commissiarr as a major exferior alferation in aecQrdance wifh this
ehapter and secfron 12-3-6 af this title. Any pro,ject whfch requires a
condifional use permif sfrafl afso obtain approval of the planning and
errvfrarlmerrta1 commissfon in accardance tivifh chapfer 16 af this
title. Compfefe applicafians for major exferior alteratrons shalf be
submitfed ira accordance wrth admtnrstrative schedules deveJoped
by fhe deparfinenf of community development for ,pfarrning and
envrronmental corrarrrlssian arrd design review board review.
7. Submifta! ltems Required, Major ExteriQr Alteratron: The fallowing
submitfal ifems are requirsd:
a. Applicatian: An appJicatiara shall be rnade by fhe owner
of fhe building ar the buildrrag Qwner's aufhorized agenf or ~
representatlve on a form provrded by the administrator.
Any application for condominiumrzed buildings shall be authorized by fhe cQndamirrrum association irr confarmity
wrth afI perfinent requirements of the concfominium
associafian's declarations.
b. Application; Confents: An appCicafion for a mafor exterior
alteration shaU include fhe following kems:
(9) Corrrpleted application form, filing fee, and a Irsf '
af a11 avvners of property facafed adjacent fo the g
subject parcel. The ovvner's Irst shall include the ~
names of all c?wners, fheir mailing address, a Iegal ~
descripfiQn of the property owrred 6y each, and a
general descriptiorr of fhe property (including the
narrre vf the property, if appficable), and fhe name
and marling address of the coradominium
associatrora's representative (if applicable)_ Sard
names and addresses shall be a6talned fram the
currenf tax records af Eagfe County as they
appeared nof more than fhirty (30) days pricar tQ the
appfrcafian submittaf date.
(2) A written statemenf describrng fhe propasal and ~
how fhe proposal compNes with fhe Lianshead
6
redevelopment masfer plan and arry ather relevant
~ sections of the VaiJ comprehensive pCan.
(3) p survey stam,ped by a licensed surveyor
indicating existing cvnditians on the property
r'ncluding the location of improvemerrts, topography,
and nafural features.
(4) A ecrrrent title reporf to verffy owrtersnip,
easements, and otiaer encumbrances, including
schedules A and B3.
(5) Existing arrd prapossd site plan at a minimum
scale of one inch equals twenty feet (1" = 20), a
vicinify pJan at an appro,priate seafe tv adequately
shflw the praject locafian in refafionship to the
surrounding area, a landsca,pe plan at a mr`nrmum
scale of arte inch equals twenty feet = 2D"J, a
roof height plan and existing and prQpased building
elevafions at a minimum scale of one-erghth inch
equals one foof (1/8" = 1'). The material Iisfed
a6ove sfraU include adjacent buildings and
impravements as rrecessary to dernanstrafe the
prajecf's compliance with the Liorrshead
redeveloprraent master plan.
~ (6) Sun/shade analysis af the existing and
praposed building for the spring/fa11 equinox (March
21/Sepfember 23) and wrnter solstiee (Deeember
21) at fen o'clack (1 U:OD) A. Nl. and 1Fwa o'clack
(2:00) F'. M. unless the departmenf of cornmunify
developmenf determines thaf the proposed addifion
has no impact on the existing sun,/shade pattem.
The followlng sun angle shall be used when
preparrng this anafysis:
Spring/Fal!
Equinax Sun Anqle
10: O0 A. M. 40° east of south, 50° decfinafion
2; 00 P. M. 42° west af sauth, 50' declination
Winter
Solsfice Surr Anql~
10:00 A. M. 30° east of soufh, 20° declenation
2:00 P.M. 30° west af south, 20° declrraafion
(7) Existing and proposed floor pJans af a minimurrr
~ scale of one-fourth inc,h equals one foof (114" = 9)
7
and a square fovtage analysis of aIl existing and
proposed uses. ~
(8) An archrtectural or massing model of the
proposed development. Said model shall inelude
buildings and major site improvements on ad1acent
properties as deemed necessary by the
administrator. The scale of the model sha!l be as
determined 6y the administrator.
(9) Phota averlays and/ar ofher graphic material fo
demonstrafe the special relafionship of the
proposed developmenf to adjacent properties,
public spaces, and adopted views per chapter 22 of
this title.
(10) Parkrng needs assessment and vehrcular
circulation analysis, prepared by a qualified
professional.
(91) Any additional information or maferial as
deemed necessary by the administrator or the towrt
,planning and enviranmental commissian (PEC).
The adrrainisfrafor or the planning and
environrrrenfal commission may, at his/her or their
discrefion, waiue cerfain submittal r€quirements if it
is deter,fnined that the requirements are nof ~
relevant to the proposed development nar
applicable fo the Lianshead redevclapmcnt masfer
plan.
D. Nearing: The public hearing before the planning and
envirorrrnental commission sha11 be held in accordance with
section 12-3-6 af this title. The plarrning and envrronmental
commission may approve the applicativn as submitted, approve
the applrcation with conditiorrs or mQdifications, or deny the
application. The dECI510CT af the plannrng and environmental
commission may be appealed to the town council in accardarrce
wifh seetian 12-3-3 of this fitle.
E. Lapse Of Approval: Appraval af an exferior alteratian as
prescribed by this arficle snall lapse and became void twd (2)
years following the dafe of approval by the design revrew board
unless, prior to the expiratron, a building permit is issued and
consfrucfion is commenced and diligenfly pursued to complefian.
Adrrainistrafive extensions shall be allowed for reasonable and
unexpected delays as lor7g as code provisions affecting the
proposal laave not changed.
92-7H-8: CC7MPLlA1VCE BURDEN: `
!t shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the ~
evidence before the planning and enviranmental commission and the design
8
review board fhat the proposecl exfericar afteratian ar new develapment is in
~ compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead mixed use 1 district, that the
proposaf is consisferrf with applicable elements of the Lionshead redevelopment
master plan and that the prQpasal does nat otherwise have a signifrcant rregative
etfect on the character of the neighborhoori, and thaf the proqasal substantiafly
eamplres with ofher applfca6le elemenfs af the Vail comprehensive plan.
12-7H-9: LOTAREA AlVD SI7E DINIENSIOIVS.
7'he mrnrmum !ot ar site area shall be ten thQUsand (10,000) square feet of
buildable area.
12-7H- 9 0; SE7BA CKS;
7he minimum building sefbacks sha!l be ten feet (10) unless otherwise specified
in the Lionshead redevelopmenf master plan as a build-to line.
12-714-71: NEIGNT AND BULK.'
6uilafrngs shall have a maximurra average burlding height of sevenfy one feet (71)
wlth a rnaximum height af 82.5 feet, as further defiraed by the Lianshead
redevelopmenf rrrasfer plan. AII development shall comply with the design
guidelines and sfandards found in the L.ionshead redevelopment masfer plan.
Flexibrlrty with the standard, as incorporated in the Lionshead redevelapment
master plan, shaf! 6e afforded tca redevelapment projects which rraeef the intenf of
design guidelines, as revreuved and approved by the design revrew board.
12-7N-12: DEIVSITY (DWELLING UIVtTS PER AC,RE):
~ Up fo a thirty fhrse pereent (335,66) increase aver the exisfing num6er of dwelling
units on a properfy or thirfy five (35) dwelling trnlts per acre, whichever is greater
shall be a1lQwed. For the purpose of calculating densify, employee housing unfts,
accommodation unlts, trrrae share units, and fractronal fee club unlfs shalJ nof be
counted as dwelfing units. Additionalfy, a"lodge dwelling urrif" as dcfined herein,
shaJf be courrted as twenty five percenf (25%) of a dweflirrg urtit far the purpose
of calculafrng densify. A dwelling unif in a multiple-family burfdr`ng may rnclude one atfached
accommodativn urrit na larger than arae-fhtrd (113) af the fotal flaor area of the
d we!ling. I
92-7H-93: G,ROSS R'ESIDEIVTlAL FLOC7f? ldREA (GRFA):
Up to fwo hundred fiffy (250) square feet of gross resrdential floor area shall be
allowed for each one hundred (900) square feet af buildable site area, or an
increase of fhrrfy fhree percent (33%) over the existing GRFA fou»d on the
property, wnichever 1s greater. ,Multr"pfe-family dwelling unrts trr fhis zQne drsfricf
sha11 nQt be eRtitled to addltional gross resrdentfal floar area urrder the 250
ardinance, section 92-95-5 of thfs title.
12-7H-74: 51TE COI/ERAGF.
Site coverage shall nof exceed sevenfy percenf (7091o) af the total site area,
urrless atherwise specifed in the Lionshead redevefopmerrt master plan.
~ 12-7H-15: LAIVDSCAPI,NG AND SlTE DFVELOPNIENT:
9
Af leasf hverrty percent (20%) of the fotal srte area shall 6e landscaped, unless
otherwfse specified in the l.lonshead redevedopmertf master plan. ~
92-7H-96: PARKlNG A1VD LC?ADlNG:
Off street parkrng and loadrng shall be provided in accordance with chapfer 10 of
fhis trtle. At least one-half (112) the requtred parking shall be located withrn the
main building or buildirtgs.
12-7H-18: M171GATlON OF DEVELOPMEN7lMPACTS:
Propcrty owraersldevelopers shafl aIso be resporasrble for mitigating clirecf
impacfs of thely develapment on public infrastructure and in all cases miffgation
shall bear a reasonabfe relatian fp the devefoprrrerrt impacts. lmpacts may be
determined based on reports prepared by qualified consultants. 7he exfent of
mitigatr`on and publrG amenity r`mprovemenfs shag be balanced wifh the goals of
redevelopment and uwill be determined by the planning and enviranrraental
cornmission in review of development projecfs and conditianal use permifs.
Mitigation af i+mpacfs may irtclude, buf is rrot firrtited tq the following: roadway
improvemenfs, pedestrian walkway improvemerrts, sfreefscape improvements,
stream tract/bank irnpravemenfs, publlc art improvemenfs, and simiJar
improvemenfs. The infent of fhis sectian is fo only requr're mrtrgafion for large
scale redevelopmentldevelopment projects which produce substantial aff site
impacfs.
12-16 Conditianaf Use Permifis (in part)
12-96-1: Pur,pflse; Limifations.° ~
In order fo provide the flexibiJity necessaty to achieve the objectives of this fr'tle,
specrfied uses are pe,rmifted !n cerfain distrr`cts sub,rec# to the grantrng of a
conditional use permtt. Because of their unusuaf or speclal characteristics,
erandifional uses requfre review and evaluation so fhaf they may 6e lacated
properly wifh respect to the purposes af thrs titfe and with respect to thelr effects
on sUrroundirrg properfies. The review process preseribed in this chapter is
infended to assure campafibilify and harmanious develQpment between
condifranal uses and sUrroundirrg propertres and the town af farge. Uses lisfed as
cnnditional uses in the various disfricts may be permi#ted subject to such
conditions and limitations as the tawn rrnay prescribe ta ensure that the location
arrd operafiQn of the conditional uses wilf be in accordance wifh develapment
objectives of the towrr and will rrot ,be detrimental ta other uses or properties_
Where conditrons cannat be devrsed fv achieve these obJectrves, appfications for ~
conditional use perrnifs shall be denied. ;
~
!
12-96-7_ Use S,peeific Criteria And Sfandards: ;
The folfowing criteria and standards shall be applicable to the uses listed belaw
in consialeration of a conditioraal use permrt. These er'iteria and standards sha!l be
in addition to the criteria ana' findings required by secfron 12-9 6-6 af this chapter.
A. Uses And Criferia:
11. Single-family and twa-family dwellings, rn the Lionshead Mixed Use 1
zone districf:
Sirrgle-famify ar two-family resrdentiaf cfwellings shall be allowed when: ~
10
~ a. Developed as part of a coordinafed mixed-use development;
6. The fow-density residentral scale is advanfageous to creafe
cornpati6rlrty with or a fransition to ofher low density
residential deveJo,pmenf irr fhe vicfnify,`
c. The single-family and hva-farnify residences are designed to
the general scale and character af residences in ofher
single-family and twa-family zane districts; and
. ci, The proposed deueloprnent is consisfen# wrfh fhe intent and
obfecfives of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
Vail Land Use f'lan
The Vail Land Use Plan was initiated in 1985 and adopted in 1986 by the Vail
Town CounciE. The main purpose of the Lar+d Use Plan is two-fald:
1. To articulate the Iand use goals of the Town.
2. To serve as a guide for decision making by the Town.
The Vail Land Use Plan is intended to serve as a basis firom which future land
use decisions rriay be made within the TovArn of Vail. The goals, as articufated
within the Land Use Plan, are meant to be used as adopted policy guidelines in
the review process for new developrnertt proposals. In conjunctian with these
gaafs, land use categories are defined to indica#e generaF types of iand uses
which are then used to deve8op the VaiJ Land Use Map_ The Land llse Plan is
~ not intended to be regulatory in nature, but is intended to peovids a general
frarnework ta guide decision making. Vllhere the land use categories and zoning
canfiict, existing zoning controls developmen# on a site.
The Vl/est Day Lot is identified as being a part af the Resort Accammodatians
and Services land use ca#egory. The Resart Accorinmadations and Senrices land
use category states:
Thls area includes actrvifies aimed at accommodafing the overnJghf and
short term visitor to the area. Prrmary uses include hotels, lodges,
serviee stattons, and parking structures (wifh densitres up to 25 dwelliRg
units or 50 accommodatian unrts per buildable acre). These areas are
aFiented foward vehreular access from 1-70, with other supporf
commercial and buslness services incJuded. Also alJowed in fhis
category, would be instifutional uses and various rnunrcipal uses.
Lianshead Reclevelopment Master Plan
The Lianshead RedeVelapment Ilflaster PiaR was adopted on December 15, 1998
by #he Vail Town Council. Accordpng to the Town Council,
"The master plan was rnrtiafed 6y the Towrr nf Vail fo encourage
redeuelopmerrt initiafrves wrthin the Lionshead sfudy area. 8oth public
and private irrferests have recognized thaf Lionshead foday laclss fhe
~ economfc vitality of Uarl Village, fts nelghboring commerclal drstrrcf, and
faifs to offer a world class resort experience. Lionshead's economrc
11
i
. ~
potential has been inhibited by a nUmber of recurrent fhernes.• lack of ~
growth rn accommodation units ("hof beds'), poor refail quality, the
apparenf deferioraflon of exisfi»g buildings, an uninteresting and
dlscorrrrected pedestrran snviranment, mediocre archftecfural characfer,
and the a[asence of ineenfrves for redevelopmerrt."
ul. STAFF RECOMMENDATIQN
As this is a worksession for the purpase of allowing the applicant to present an
flverview of the Lionshead Core Site Hotel project, the Staff wi11 not be making a
formal recommendatian at this time. Staff does recommend, however, that the
Commission listen to a presentatinn an the project proposal and provide any
initial direction the Commissioners may have at this time.
Vfl. ATTACHMENTS
A. Reduced Plan Set
B. Descrip#ian the Lionshead Core Site Hote! Project.
C. Vicinity Map
~
.
I
,
~
~
12 a
_ e
h ~ ~ 1 I ~
~.~t~tiao~anaaax oa ~ I i i! ~ 1~ ~.6 I 1111111111111
I ~ a
Q~~HSNC3I'j ~ d ~ " ~ ~ f 1IE ll `-l' ~ ~ ~ ~
i
~r,p ge y G. p, F F
~,w.. w~. ~
° ~°~y e
G C<L^O ^ C r 9~ 6..~-.GOOOS O~^~ CNOO~+fyp ~NM Y en ~Gf- ~O
e -cG.: . tVNtVNnNNtV h Nrv +~1~~
~ °~V~ ~ o ~ ~I ~<aeeee~<ee a~ite««a< e«
T-
`
~
I^ l I ~
IT
~
~
ou
, ,
~A ~ _ . . . ! y - _
~ y
e¢y _ ~ . . ! x..y ~
3 ~ J
_.~~i
76}+ y~ ~y~`~`3 i I ~I ,r
t~l :i~f
J ~ I~I t~
\
ir ~
. i -
i
i ~
~
~
nuisi
w~ 3< ~ ~ 91< ~ m W .
. , - - „ ~
1
n ~
~
~ ~i!!~ ~iif~l ~ '1 ~{~ek 1 ~ !9i111~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ .t -h ~ - i
,~S~~M ie ai~ ;~s~ ~ ;~:s~~
Aii~ q~ iiLOC+ iCI i ~ Z i~ i i i~ f i~ 1
11 Y ~ Y2S
SrC 5 ~ C its f~
C~S~~~i~ I~lii7'e7 17 ~ wNe•a.rt~..~p•
aai~7SY{~
K 1141,41! 1o
~?"1'~~:Y.E~' ~ tI w ~
n f ~ -
{ ~ t<f ;/1. i ! > ~z,$~+~~~i
I f f tld `
4 I , -
-
~ ~ ~ ! ' ` I \ ~y y4
. • ~ ~s ~ `~i.s`~~- _ ~ _ , 1 ~
¢
1 ACTMer~at i i~~ _'_yi.__~ O ~ ~~S ~
V yw 3 ' Y-' ma ~g
R
4 Y4
~ gf ' I I
C%r
~
Is k
? ~ ~ 4 ` , ' ~
-1~
, I i' ~ I! I
yi~ ~ ~~6y+E C~ • oe ~l~ _ 4 ~ ~ ~ I
¦ E ~r B 11, q
se ~ll.~ LBh~ t A
[ g~ ' t +
Y
;
sr:ajAjf1(q'- - d HUoD
~ ? . ^@ ,i Q~~ I`j ~ p ~ ~ ~ t r ~ i ~~9 +g~ ~s~ ~ ~ A ~
L
" ~ ~ ti • ~
A `,,;r
F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~°.~~• , ~F ~11~ *
I y ~ ri = ~ lJ~ F ~ ~ a ^1• ~ w
F~'----~---^-----'-`--"
~ Q ~ 1 p~ \ .
tiI
•~~rR, `_.~~=.`f ~ - ~ ~'//i '
~ _ - ~ iyy--' _ ~ 3 I
~ I
i57 i
--y---,
RAC-,H
~ ; • ° d ` t, f ,
t ~ , I
g . r •,a . t¢; ;
41 •_-s;~•-; - 4
+i
Iu~ ~
I
~ wE5 S.IOHSFL~A~ C[ ctEU V ~ i ~ ~,d
~
~
°'~s
q~e ~
_ , ~ ~ ~ ~,~~~.•t / ' ` , ` 1
d E /x J J.- . ' f ~~li,
~ i ~ - ~ - ~7' ~ ~ ~-S, 3 ; `
~ r ~ 6~ " [a 2~ ~ ~1 . \\'t'` 'T`w t>.Lr \ - ~
Li
ii ~ ~ ` 4 ~ b ~ 'b ~l I ~ n ~ ~ V
8 J ~f } ~ ~ ~~,r,~ ~ ~ ~ •a~
~-~1-m,~~
I M ~ ; : ; 5~ ; ~ • ~
~ ~ f ' , 111 ±~j• ~ `~iR ~ ~ ' ~I ~ ~ ~ ~1 1 I I~ ~ 1 0...~~~:
`N
o,fP~t ~ / T 7t f I ff ~ _ y..r~`• 1 . . ~
~c`~ ~ ~ ` ~ r ~ ~ ~ 0E ,
• - 4' - f
RACT IN
~ yY FpMuwArII I y~ _1L~-I 1
imw.a
~ ` ~ • ' ~ ~
~
p 9 / ,
~ ~ y ~ P8P 6 I ~ ~~1 . 'q ~ • x ~?v
ka
1 ' i~-~ ~a ~ 4r4 ' 7 4 i
o•
3 wFs uoksT-q~o Ci~CiE ~ 1 ~ ~ • _ . ~I
~ R~ ~ , . .-1 ,e `h. 1• ~ gsd ~ e ~ ~ 1
1'-
`t ~'.y~g - ~ ~ -,y'\' aEFYq ~ t
~
~u!
. - _ ~ . . - -
Al
k~H
- ; n
,
I~ I
- - - f ~
~
n
~
.
. • ~ I ~ ~ I
, I ~ . - , .
.
~ - , ~ m: = _ s - ~ •
, ;fi-,•=a r J~ _
d ' .
~ ~
, . - - -
~ - • - ~
- -
- -
I - ~ II I II - -
~
'
r
.
~
,
,
~
i
,
. ,
,
~
- ~
N
I
; l8o I 1
r--i
-
I I
L J ' , Y
r.
~
I ~
s
~~gr~
~ 1~.
. , ~
- - -
C<11~~'~~,
• > p ~ ~ ~s: ! ~ _ ~ ~
L----~ LJo
~
~ ~
J ~
I-----
,
~
~I ~ ~ I ~ 'dl a'.W
I „
! 1 ~g ~
J 1 I N~ ;~~r , I C? C7
/
~ r----
~1 ~
~
I ' ' ~ t f ^
fI
i I i ~_Y -
j f ~ ~t/~ ws~ ~ ~
,
~ t
i
~ a
INaNa
9=a
~
E' , '
r I ~ ~ ~
.
~R
dl~ ~ w
~ 1I ^ ~
,
i'
;
L_---
I
1 91; L _-_J
~
~ ~ j ~ .
~
~ ~ i , ~
sNaWa F MoD
~(IV OI'1
,
,
ILL-
- - I------- ~
I '
,
,
s~~ a
. u
~ 039 ~b i I , ~o~g ~
ra
a I~
~ e. A e $ I ~h.J
I ~
I
~
- ~
~ ~ I
~ !
~ e
~ y .1.~'~'C~` 1~~w v `~.jaa,, ~0 C(F 1e31 illY-~ F iat
I ~a a~
z~,~V
.•".~~sn I~ ;ii:nz ~
I L__aJ L J0 IJL~
~
- ~ I -
A
,
,.~i ~I{II • ~ ~I
~
Ln
z~w
~~C
F-
~
- ~ XLQ
l . ~
e ( ~
r~~
17
I '
~ ; ; I
I ' -
rn i ~ D C7
~O I
U
wzs'~C_-,~
\
r... .
- J--~ _
~I
~ r d iI f ~Q T
~o ~pn
w~
I z w
0
~~5v
X°=~,~
L L ~ ~
~ I~ ~I ~ ~ ~
~J a ~
~17',
~ .
00 00 00 00
I
I ly 1'. 7 :I ~ 1 I.~
ui
n ol F-r,~a
~
~=o
~ ~
m ~ w L J m
J I
O
rr~~~
-`iy r I - J , ~ s Q
$o W
1 9~ I ~ I
P i , --r
Z~Ww
1 I • ~ I a
Li
~ J
w~~C~
i ~
~ g I I , I ~
~ ~ I .
i
,
~ tc- ~
~
"
w
~p~~ II
, ~ ~
v~i a ~
W~ ~ocr
i ~ ~ ~ • ~ woz
IL
D - ~oD
~
I~
*~o
i I uzNOa I p I~ ~ ~ I G~
ir, r~ tl E
IL
wo=4 rl I I ~vYr~
~ ~I ~,_1 __~1 ,`J?' ;i ~ o~
W
----L-- ~ - - - I - - _ ' a
L -r~
C -
_ _ - - - - -
~ s
~'--I1~~I T•';I ~ _ i ~
cn
~ I z~ i
~°a
~ ~ I zoav
J ~ s
I
I
D i
-~si!
' W
I
, f~f
~
w
r}, ~ I I 1' w
Y I
I ~ ~ ~ ~fi' rlr' r _ ~
i D
-z 1Q ~
_
• ~
~ , } , ~
-
~
~ ~ ~
,I c,
"0
ly ! I w ,t\
zw ~
1
WQ
woZ ~ . .
!L__ i ~
~ _
~
y p• ~ (IV
~ • ~ _
L
I ~
n 0 z
~ - - - - ~ °
~ _ _ x--` ~
0
~ a ~ ~ ? a
~ ~I f
I ?Od.4,? I
I ~ x ^ 8 I I
,
~
~
L_~._.,~...~`
~ ~ ~ ? I ~ ~ I ~
.5~~~~
~ V
~ R ~ ~ ~ ``,~'~g"' _ y~
..a--
!r
~ r.. -
t~- n
n
x Z
w ~ ~ ; ~M ~ ~ ".a g a
,
I_ L '
`
~~i:~r____I ~ ~„~i ~
\
,
- • ~
-T
~ ~ , ~•,4
0
~
LOa
~ 0
L'i~ i - Wpz
` ~ ~ ~
X Q ~
~
~
~
, _ ~ 0. .
Lj
Z~~
c ~
; i C~a
f ~ cr U7 Z
fl i~ + xpU ~
i ' J I
I
i I------ ~
li ~ s ~ - E . . ~ op
, ~
~
I
I W
I ~ ~ O
~ °x W-
~ tl
- ~
~
~
,
E 3 i ~ I q fi
sE ~ ~ ~ o~o -
~ y
~ i
~ g , .
1 I T I~ n; I
i i -I ; .i',F. ~ i:~ l•;;1 ~,.ti~ ' I z I~~
w - ~ , ta
~
3 x ~ J
~ ~
y
zq -j
xz~ ~S
w
i
~ r
~~~d ~ ~ r-
~
~ ~
-V-----
~
~
I! LO
z a:
~
<
; ~o -0of
Wzz
I ~
0
~~a
~'J ~ t/~ Z W M
_
~ - _
7
,
1
/ s
? ~
~ ~ ~
y R ~ f7 ~t
;
? , , r ~ _ ~ +
F' ~ ~
a yl ~
1 e
1 ~ + 1
f ~
_ -
fn I w
ZGf
i cn 1 1 >c ~ ~ ~
f 7 ul ~
~
? - - '
.YNawa
'V"~
Z w
Y Wc~ ,
I ~ I
; , _ _ Ol o
00
;
, a
L'I
in M ~
i ZO~
L,jT~
r
~
I ~
,
~
~
' I
~
i I ~ . Q I ~1 I W ~ J
Z Q
X°z
W
- ____1-- \
. ,
~ •
~ ~
- --1 .
Z
~d
~CY~
~~Qz
J
.~.~a l lo~~ F;Pc~
~ I z L~ ~ ~ ~ ~I Ir ~ - ~
I
I q I
,xi ,
~ J a
-===-.AT--- e- - 0 ~
_ > ~ 3d
,Jf,i ~z d
M
L
' Y"
1 I ~
i
~
w~ J 1 r- ; ~ I I I ~ -
"Hill ~ J ~I .f I I U I
~ I J\ I ~ i~ ~ N. I ~ ~ ^S «GK'
~ -
r
1
1 ! 1' i I
~ i' ~ ~ I , II ii~~i ii ~ ii~
~r
~ I
~
i I i
, py
F
I I I 'I I I ~~t~l !JJ J ~
L ~
p ri
I ~I I I~ I ~ ~ ~ ' \1
' II ~ ' •
j ' _ . j~°,-_-~~a'`_-_-zl°~~ , 1 ~ \''Si ~ i yy~\~
- ~ ~ Ll
~
.
- ;
~
~
x ! z~Y
~ ``'oz
{ ~=c~
Y
t ~
~¢°r~~ ~.~~n~~
' ~ ~"~I il ~ ~•t~~~rt~at ~ I ~ ~ ~W~ ~
cil
I l'~~-.
;
I ~+I 9 - I
- - - ~ ~ ~ [7
, Y.
,
I ~~P I
,
019, 9 ~ ~'1~1
I I ~4 I
4
~ _ I I I I I
L ~ Ip ~ I- ~
n ofi
~
F ~
S
Y
i ~ ~ I ~ •i ~ I ~
g i e I I I~ a
~ ~F.+!
, Lj~
GA
Cl'
o R
' ~6q
~ U
- r/
~
I
~r bl Q~T
a ~ W ~ b I Mk W~
~ f~---- - - - -1-- 1 ~
i _ ~
~ Ila .ra. ~ ~ ^
^---'----------°--I
I I I , ~ ~ II!$q ~
I i ' I l` I I I~ I
~ y_ I I I ~ I I' ~
Li
I
I 4~ 7 ~s 5'' p I ,
l
I . ~ r a
I
~x:m ~ a
j(d
i _ i I '~5~~, ` i~ I I
i
1 ' Y
l l
I ~I
I I l~ ~
a d a~ i^ a 'a d d'd
~
a ti I
? c7 y= I
$ Q`~~' I'1
i;
~RM
dO El
l , I
ai -
x
0
I
I
~
~ l 1
,
~
~ -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I 1
r
~ ~ ~ I I f9 !
~r
~
~
1
~
Po' 'a b~ ; b bi6. .
,
~
.z..~.a~xoD
~
~d o
~
~
- -
~t-T-;--j--I-~----_i ~ ---j--- r- ;
1 g 33 ou
t i
ta 1 I ~ I I _ ~ # r ~ d
99
; - . _
~
U
I ~ I LLU
I
I .,~~,I ~ T II T I
I r I - ' ~ I
1 g
]
I I ~ ~ al
M I Z
I ~ I ~ ~ ! T 3 + k
I I . I I I Al
•
IL
k
4 m
i i gG a
P
%--J 1
z ~ I I o~
Y . ~ -I. .
MR3
,
13
k
i ~ i1
£]~9
r7m
I 2€ t~ I t
I ` , la~ ? R 4~ ~ {
b I ' '
1
~i
Te ~
s
f I I~Ik p' ~ im
IL ~r, y
i • ~ ~ ~ ~e 9 .5 3v ;rt
~
~I a
I I b ~ ~ 3~ A~ ~
;
if
;
i59
f9-f
~ ~ ~ ~P ~ ~ ~~q ~ I ~ r I' . - , I
f,
~-~~CE F
St
`~l~ ~
~0 =~7 ~~C
, , , ,
;i~
!i ~tf-i -
~ a ~
,
a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
y a
.r.uM~c5'r ENQa ~~i~!
~.C1~~F4S3! ~ a 5y
s
.
r<; I'-
v~
m 3M M3 m
~
~
Al if f r ~ - F i ~ r~- ' .
~ -
~ , y~ yi ~ I kfq , ~ I -fl_7L [~S~
- 3~ I
mr, Il=i:' j
~ -
~ ~I!1, i
_
a
~ i ~
~y° _ ir_e . e - R . ' 6 $ ~ ~ ~ ' I~ f • ~ ~ ~
a
i D - E gr ~r~
F
§m
o'.
o
shrf ~k,'1 1
i`
I ..--~1 L:ojJ `•-j.~ ~f"~]
~
~
~
~
k ~ I IS I
•I ~ i ~ i ~ ~~g ~ ~ _ i .
w
t
14~
I ~
~
~ N 5 ~
00y
I I I L ES RBC I I ~ 1 ' ~ I m I .
` d I ` L
FE
E33 ~
. , ~
I I 4 ~ ~ ~
F y a~ , ~ ~ ~ ' 3 _ ~ • ' a.\\ E-'
EEB I
e~
, ~
t3
ii~ A
Fs I
-I~.
i
T~, II I E , 11
y;
13 ~ !F t ~r
~
i ~ i I i •i ~ ~
~
~ -
F 19~ @ s ~ ~ ~ i
.T.~~d d
1 I i i i f3 I 1 I I
HM=zi
9
~ _ - - I
; 11 1- ~ I
~
~ - { I
l.
. L;
i ,
f/ ~ ~ T ' 1 I ~ ' I I I y
r I K Y `
f I ~ . 'I I I I f I
~
I
-
E
~ ~
F
3?,
~i q f
. ~f i r
, 'K ,~I~
~
,
` fill~ ~ ~
t,~
~i Il f IFF=TI
~I I a ~
; I x~~
i i I rjr~r
d d d d d d d d d d
d;JNMid tl j Y jI GZ
o~
~ ~
~Yi1
LW _
. ~
; ; ~ ~ 3 S~ i~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-
,T
=PFL
~
1;
~ .
"
_ . :
i E+
~ •C 9~ ,F - r::~ ~ r s
F=F
y~ . I I ~ ~ ~ ~F~-•II "~~F
'i~ 'I~ ~ titiFF~ a7
~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
,
I
~ ~ J~ I , i ~ , ~ ~ ~ i i i ~
j
~
-
L
IP ~
'S.
s5f`~
~ ~ f ~ ~ I I I I
I f
i
i ",a~ W C 'J1 ; ? ~
~ i
~ ~
~i y a ~ 2
.~Y HUaD ~.~~i
i I ,
Q
y I V
~
4 I I ~ ~
-
i
bPP I 1 I
-
; ~ -
fi:~
~
{ q
3 1"~
" fi \ li..~,. ~ ~~k~ ~ 1 & ?
,
;
?
IEli
~l ~k€ l T
~
I ~ _ ~ ~j~f ~ ~ ' ' I ~
E23I=1,! $ r~ I i ~ f ! e o e
~ I I C -E ' •
i
I ' ~ ~
~ r3: ~ -~~s" J ~ ' 'il~ ~ •
ll` h ~ EEE~ ~I ' ' Il~ z t ~J
;
i
~
:
Ttjk
Q~'~ 1 s~3~ ~91
EE=
A
"
z
i
~ # ~ t I ' ~ / ~
3 -
e ~
~
~€~~~g ~~CI~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 € ~ •
r
I
, ~
c~ I ± ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I r ~ ~ ~
- -
Fi.~-~r",
ti ~ ;r y I _ I r I ~ ~ i tiF ~ Co - ~
-
~I
~
~
. . .
~
~
I - ~r
~ EFEfl ~
B
~ ' •y~' ~ : ' $ ~ F9 # ~ '
I I
FFR
9
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ i
(T`~ij I~
~1
d R Y 4 I o~
F
~
~ ~ _ 0 - I...~ ?
l _ ~y
P
~ u
{;7 ~ r
~ ~ ~ ~ ' •
~
B ~ ~ AR
~
~
. ~ ~
3
~
ji
- _ ~
,
~
r
~
i~,y ~ "4 e f-.5
F,
• ~ ~ - ~ ~~i . .i f 1} _
~
~is~~
~~d
X
~
y
€
~ -
^ -
.
I
_ I _
4
,
~U 5 W
.
r.
~
,
I ~ - ~ ;
~
;
~
a
~
,
,
,
, <<
,
,
~
1
g ' -
~
i~
r.~
~ i
i
i ~
_ a IG t ~
~
~
- tl
s k ~a ~ ~ ~ I r I
.tN~ac~'r mao~
i~ v' oy ` Q~~~1-I
I~~ei9l
~ I
.
~
~
~ ~ - ~
- ~
W
m
, t A
~ - ~
~
~
~
h
I ! j
u
~
~
K
~ ~ .
~ - -
~ ~ -
~ L
t Attachment: B
~ II. DE'T'A1LED PROJEC'F DESCRII'TIOI`d
A. Core Srte
The redevelogment of [he Core Site (Qld Gondola Building and Sunbird Lodbe) was the most
irnportant and most discussed element witliin the Lianshead Redeyelogment 1Vlaster Plan. Tkais
site was icientified by the Master Plan as being key to the overall success of the Lionshead
recievelapnient initiative given its prominent locatiora and the ability of the redevelopment of this
site ta "spu3" aciclitional redeveloprnent wi[hin khe coi-e of Lionshead. The Master Plan identified
the core site as the priority location of a resort hote3 anci the pi°aposed project refiects that
emphasis. Below is a det3iled description of the txis[ing and praposed conditions.
a
~ k ; .
yw
-4
l
ky
~ f ( ~ ~ ' /{.1 1 ty . f' ~ a~
~01 L~ f rj~ 'Y'~~ ~ ' ~ gA;4~ { ya~ s ~y ~ ,FT
y. i
~ 4 , i ~ i `'~a ~:'R° i' M ~v''~ ?u~ ~ fU,
F. ]
jo'r
~ te
r
l.~y~}' ~ I A~~ 1~M1 ~Y / ' , ~ ~eGl fr,'Fl',~ixw+a ~ ~ i~Y~.l? ~j f`. ~ ~'?w'~~,~~` ~ i •
lx J
L ; ff U'`
~5,
$
.4r
f
Lf F {
l! ~
• ~ Y ~'-d=-.
~
~ Core Site - Aeria:I Perspective
. M-~..r
~
Vail Resnrts - The Redevelopetlen[ of Lionshead 6
l
~
1. Existinb Canditians ~
The existing site includes two stnictures; the Gondola Building and the Sunbird Lodge
Building. The avera11 site includes approximately 14,000 sq. ft. of offices and skier
services facilities, 9,200 sy. ft. of retail, 23,263 sy. ft. of arestaurant area, and 100
enlployee beds (nat currently deed restricted). The si[e aisa contains employee and
pubtic tockers, Public ski starage, public restrooms, storage Facilaties for on-mountain
operatians, and parking and loading areas. Thc clack tower element is located on thzs
site. The site is srireounded by pedestrian streets, ather lodging and retail facilities, and
the Eagle Bahn Gondola and ski yard.
2. Overvievv of Project
• L7esign Concept
The Core Site is propased ta be redevelaped as a hotel (a f-jve star Rock Resorts hotel
facility). This hotel will be develoQed in two siruckures whicb from the pedestrian level ~
will read as four separate stz-uctures. The layotit of the site mirrors tl7e de;sign shawn in
the Lionsheaci Rectevelogment Master Plan. The plan creates two new pedestrian streets
throligh the progerty makinb the ski slopes and retai] areas more accessible te the
pedestrian. This building and street layout creates new view corridars as recanlmended
in the Master Plan.
Tlie proposed buildinas have been designed vvith stfict attention to the design gUidelines ~
which inclLide buildin„ stepbacks of 16' ar greater as the buildinb transitions from the
groujad floor to the upper stQries. The design ceancept was taken dixectly fram the Master
Plari and all buildinbs have heen desfgned wiEla a sturdy base, quiet middle, and
articulated top/roof.
Vehicular access to the Hotel and subsurface loadin~ and parking areas is gainec~ fram
Lionsliead Place. Fedestfian access to and through the site oecurs on every frontage of
the site.
• Project Components
The hotei includes 81 hotel roams, 60 of whieh are h4de1 lock-off units. In addition, there
aze proposed ta be 79 dwelling units of varying sizes and conf gurations, Qwners of
candominiuin units and lack-affs wilI be encouraged to participate in a rencal grogram
operated by the hotel. A variety of incentives and disincentives will be utilized to
encc,Lrrage owners ka participate in this pFOgrain so that the eratire praperty can be
aperated as a resart hotel facility. Tkae hotel includes a large labby area, lounge, spa
facility, meeting rooms, and other necessary amenities associated vvith operating a fave
star hotel property.
~
Vai] Resorts The Redevclopment of Lianshead 7
~
~ ,~~.~`,T .::i~ S ~`i`~~ ~ ~ -
f I ~ , t, J.~--
_ ,~I.. ~ , . .
~ ~
~ I., f
s l +
I ~ Yb~N !L ,af-t
q.. I
N ~er,
~~.~.a..-
Yi
T F
~ 4 4, C - ~
qq
Retail Level - Internal Streets
.
i.
r.~
~ 5lAg 'zm;g ,u L.n
r _,r ~'^g 1 n,~,.xn,~ 5, ' - ~ ~
Li 4y `
I ~ ! ^1 • ' ' i ~ ~ j I 16
a
1@eltt. R
.I.. SWLNff 4;1. ~ .
J _ L1/09F Y +~f]SF 9: I _ '
3:-
. ~1S
i ~ icYf ~ . L~ ~ n -a.55we~
~
' - L
Retail Level - North Retail Mail
~
Vail Resorts - The Redevelupment af Lionshead 8
1
s
As shown in the graphics above, the restaurant and retaiI areas have been lacated tfl talce ~
finIl advantage of the pedestrian mall areas, the exposure to the ski slapes, and the
expasure to the sun. The Core Site praject includes approximately 22,100 sq. ft. of retail,
9,770 sq. ft, restaurant area (5,230 sq. ft. is leased area), and 3,545 sq. ft. of skier services
area. Skier services, restrooms, and other more public eiements of the program have been
located at convenient lacations within the brailding so that skiers and shoppers can take
full advantage af the ski mountain and the apres ski facilities within Lionshead.
~ne Parking and I,oading
of the more significant features of the proposed develapment is the creation of a twa
level sub-surface parking and 1oading faciiity beneath the proposed buildings. Two-
hundred and ninety (294) garking spaces have been provided within this facility in
addition to the 31 parking spaces that were paid-in-lieu for the Kaiten'berg Castle
restaurant. Of the 321 (290 + 31) parking spaces pravided, 215 are required to support alj
of the uses propased on Yhe property except the skier club_ The additianal 106 paz'icing
spaces provided will serve the proposed skier ctub membership. The laading facility provides $ loading berths where anly 5 are required ta support the
proposed uses. The excess capacity within the loading facility will be available for public
use. A service elevator has been grovided tQ bring deliveries directly into the core of
Lionshead from this Ioading facility. This loading facility will also support on-mountain
flperations and facilities via the existing below grade tunnel to the Eagle Bahn Gondola.
~
,
~
~
,
1
IT~
C ~~r fy 6 T
~ p EF
tr-
{ 1TG11 ll IlI 1~~'
y°'
~,..--„"~--~NU Ir M
'm~ 4t~.~S~ r5-• , tr` , ~ i ' ry ky NSM
n, :,~'.7-
n T ~ i a
a V~
t„'~ffp
.
~,g' ~I~
~
.
~'.5 f• ~ ? ~ ~'_n,~ r'~"-~`
. . ' ' ' ' "
' North Elevation - Ice Rirtk
(as viewed frorn North Lionshead Mall) ~
Vail Resorts - The Redevelopment of Lionshead 9
~
A
lij
' 1' T
Ah ~
~11
~
5- J
la a"-}~`va 1~'°' rr'il
F ;'2s sf , r Y_~ 1 F
~~~jt~`~ ~
'c
' ~
J ,.~I-
L
, ~i n ( 11 "~y ~
~.............A~. 5 + 1
South Elevat~on - Ice Rink
(as viewed from internal street)
~he Public Iee Rinlv'Skier Bridge proposed redevelopment plan includes the mast significant public benefit of aIl af the
redevelopment projects: a new public ice rink faciiity. This facility will be cvnstructed
by Vaii Resorts Development Company and is proposed to be operated by a public
agency such as the Vail Recreatian District or the Tawn of Vaii. This use was identified
as a"desired" improvement within lhe Nlaster Plan to help further revdtalize the north
pedestrian mall and create a new pedestrian magnet for Lionshead. The two images
above show the cantext of the ice rinl:.. as viewed from the narth pedestrian looking south
and fram the new pedestrian street within the project looking ta the north.
Alsa associated with this project is the redevelopment of the skier bridge across Gore
Crec.k. The new bridae will liave greatly irnproved architeeture ar?d will be wider thar?
the existing bridge to allow a variety of usersltraffic an the bridge at the same time. This
bridge wili be repiaced during the same construction season as the redevelppment of the
West Day Lot Residences.
F ~
Vai] Resorts - The Redevelopment of L.ionshead 10
r
k+k
1 . . 7 i
^r~ '7 a~ x ~ , M1 ,II ; ct j
p ~~s i A .s = _ I l'`7.~7 ~5~ `Il I t t fY.Y z~• ~ , ~~T7~ii~
~
s : I, i r w;
. _ er_ _ x , ~ ~
> a~ ~
. f. _ ~ ~ on_ °c ? i~'i'a
G ,
17QJ
~z~;
. ~ ~ ~I ~ i 7' !-b~ ~I`. G I ^ ~ . ~
~jj
~
t5 k~ i;~s = p ~ x i~'~ • I ~ I,~~I I I~,J.~-all c
- ~ ~ f -i ! • . w ~ ~t~ -
._t ~ . R.. , 1'.. ~ o . ~ ~[x]FJ 1\. v
_ ~ I .I,? ~ . . _ { ~ x4
q~ ~,.a 1 Z
iz-
~yZU-
. R . ~ ' f L' A'~ 6 n 1.~ Y ~~S \
3 3 ~ 1 F t ~ : Plf te] AT ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~
}r a:m 1, 1
t
. . P i` _ ~ ~ p R ~ > r 7 G . y 2 e , : . ~ . ~ ~ 1~4 ~ •
? ~ t n 4 1('~
~ ` S u ~ ~ ~ J re • ~ ~~•4++'~~
-Qy ~3' I
z
' ~ y . a : ,:y ,~n~r . ?
w4k:` ~ - t : b C~`rt~° s .r' d~ . ;S.~F~ . ,aj~V h r ""ht ti.7~'
tl ~ ~4~ _ - -:n~•~' . ".r~``.q~r~'~L~,~ 1 ~J
: .
vYy ~_..a+ A+ . ~F
.
"
~
.Y ~ Y • VY ^W- ` ~ M .f~,y 4 .
s. I • }~a~,hr 2
.
~
: .
.
. . , 1y° p,j~?e• .:b, "
''..~3r.s` ` 3~ 1.~~~ +'':Y~ a`~q',t. !~,4.
~ --s ys
* t,J . ~1~ ,yJ ~ tiT•~~ ,~7°4 ar' t~
.,E~
~ • ~
r 4 w~ v ,y ~ - '4• ~ 1 ,a; +~5- ~4 a ' ~T
4 42,~~_R fiR+ i 1 ~ Y . f i. ~,JA, ` ~ . ~•1 lTi',~
VOW"
, • ti ~ ~ ~,'f ~ , T s ~ ~ •
. ~ - m. ~2 7 # M4~s, ~ .
r
. i r~t, ~ r}-tE,. ~~.#.~i :'°a~ p'~, . 'r°~~~a-:--i ~ '.`isY''
~3f~ ~ F 1 *~v•
' ~ry~# ~ _ . : h r ~ "t ' . . ~ ~ b y~,,~~.~. ~t ~ x ~ .
' ~"c r . 1 ~ b s Y-
. 1 t.-M
t
~.fi s~ } ,6. f 6 ~ ~k'S ~ A - ~ _ i 4 ~ ' ~
~''4'3 4~ A ; J..~ . .,A ~ y -:..~'i I
(v . h _ ~.P ~ ~ ; ..8: Y.~,~k 1~ I
IL
Q'm ` s
~ , ~,~y~ - ~
. . a - ~ w
~:t:~ ~~..~7~~3~.~~dti~~,~~rL:..~: ~~.eT;~
~
k ~ 1 7~,~.. :_^t~, c. v'• i~~,a'~ . s~~]C~er ,.__i~ ~
- ~ ~ : ,q ~ ~..r ~ ~ , >
i
i
i 4~.
. ,
~
h fti~~ •S r ~y« ~~""~e 3y a h ' . ~ ``'e~ , ~
a
~ ~ ~ar ' i .a ? ~i, ~lYa:,,~..P j. ~ f w: ! ~ frs . '
Y!;W °.s ..~k +~c~ F'r r"~', w . ~ ; ' i. r~sY
Yr ay~ - s ' p ~ K f .w
~ k`
A~Lacllment. C ~ ,g,~i '"i~ ~ . s
I r._°,. 'F~y'~,•~~~'.,f'. ~.~f' ~.~'.~T"a_x' ~~1, ~ 1~" a~~ I,~,. ~rr ,t, ~ ~ f . I 4
-
f
~
~ MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Enviranmental Commission
FRC?Nl: Community Develapment Departrnent
aATE; April 12, 2004
SUBJECT: Report to the Planning and Environmental Commission af an administrat€ve
action approving a request for a minor amendmenf pursuant to Secfican 12-9A-
10, Amendrrzent Procedures, Vail Town Code, to aIlow for an amendment to the
approved developrnenf pIan for Special Development District Na. 21, Vaii
Gateway, lacated at 12 Vail Road/Lot hJ & D, Bfock 5D, Vail Village 1S' Filing, and
sefting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vaif Gateway Plaza Condominium Associatinn, Inc., represented
by Greg Gastineau
Planner: Bsll Gibson
1. SUMMARY
Report to the Planning and Environmental CommissiQn of an adrninistratiwe action
~ approving a request for a minor amendment pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Ameradment
Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allov+r for an amendment to the approved development plan
for Special Devefopment District No. 21, Vai1 Gateway, located af 12 Vail F2aadlLot N& O,
Block 5D, Vail Uillage 15' Filing.
IL DESCRIPTION 0F REQUEST
The applicant, Vail Gateway Plaza Condominitam Association, Inc., requested approval of a
minor amendment to Special Development District No. 21, Vail Gateway, to allow for the
amendment of the approved development plan to alltiw for fhe expansion of the exis#ing
Vail Gateway carr7merciai units C-2 arad C-3 by appraximately 100 square feet each. The
expansions conWert existing comman hallway floar area to comrnercial tenant floar area.
These expansions are internal to the Vail Gateway Building and do not inwolve any exteripr
modtfications to the building.
III. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES
,
Staff:
Action: The staff is responsible for the final approval, approval wi#h coroditions, or denial
of a minor arnendment to a special development districf. Staff is also respansible for
notifying the adjacent property owners and the Planning and Environmental Gomrnassian of
the administra#ive actian.
~
~
~
r
Planninq and Enaironmeniat Gommission; ~
Action: The Planning and Environmental Commission may appeal the stafFaction and #hen
uPhald, uphald with modifications, or overtum the staff actbon.
Desiqn Review Board:
Action: 7he Design Review Board has no review authority of a mbnor amendmenf to a
speeial deveEopment drstrict, but must revierv any accompanying Design Review
applicatian.
Town CQUncil:
Actions of Design Review Board mr Planning and Environmental Commission may be
appealed tn the Town Cauncil or by the Town CounciL Tawn Council evaluates +nrhether or '
not the I]esign Review Baard or Planning and Environmental Commission erred with
approvals or denials and can uphald, uphold with matfifcations, or overkurn the board's
decision.
tV. ARPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUhAENTS
Town Staff believes that the following provisions of the 1.lail Town Cacfe are relevant to the
review of thi$ prapasal:
TITLE 42: ZC3NWG REGULATIiONS Chapter 12-9A: Spec'ral C3evelapment (SDD) Districts ~
12-9A-2: flEFINITIONS
MlNOR AMENDMENT (STAFF REVIEW): Modifications to 6uilding plans, site or
landscape plarrs that do nof alter the basic intent and eharacter of the appraved
special development dlstrict, and are consistent with the design criferia of this
ehapfer. Minar amena'rrrents may rnclude, ,but not be limited to, variatians of nat
more fhan five feet (5) to approved setbacks ana'/orbuifding foofprints; changes to
lanelseape or sife p{ans rhaf da not adversely rrnpact pedestrian or vehicular
circulation fhroughout the special development district; or changes fo gross floor
area (excludr`rrg residentiaC uses) ot'nof more than five percerrf (5/) of the approved
square focrtage of retarf, r ffice, cammon areas and other rronresidential floar area,
exeept as provided under secrion 12-15-4, "Interior Ganversions", or 72-15-5,
"Additianal Gross Residentiaf Flaorprea (250 Ordinance)" of this title.
12-9A-10: AMEN'DMENT PROCE,DURES:
A. MinorAmendments:
7. Minormodificatrons cansfstent wrth the design criteria outlr`ned in scrbsection 12-
9,4-2 (definition of '°minor amendment") of fhis Artrcle, may be approved hy the
Department of Communify Development. Alf minor madifications sha11 be indicated
on a completely revised development plan. Approved changes sha11 be noted,
signed, dated and filed by the Department of Comrnunity Development.
~
2
~
~
~ 2. Nafification crf a proposed minpr amendmenf, and a report of staff acfion of said ~
request, shall be provided to a!f property owners within or ad1acent to the spscial
develvpmenf distriet fhat may be affected by the arrrendment. Affected properfies
sha11 be as deterrrrined by the Departmerrt of Community Develapmenf. Notificafions
shall be postmarked no later than five (5) days following sfaff action on the
amendment requesf and shall include a brief statement descri6ing the amendment
and the time and date of wvhen the Planntrag and Environmental Com,mrssron will be
iraformed of the staff decisian. 1n adf cases the report to the Planning and
Envrronmental Corramission shall be made within twerrty (20) days from the ciate of
the staffs decisron on the requested amendment.
3. Appeals af sfaff decislons may be frled by adjacent property owners, ownerS of
praperty withirr the special develvpment districf, the applicant, Planr?ing and
Environmenta! Commrssion rrrerrrbers ar members of the Towvn CouRCil as vutliMed
in Seetion 12-3-3 of this Title.
V. AQNfINIS7RATIVE ACTION
The DepartmEnt of Communi#y Development has adrninistratively approved the request
for a minor amendment pursuant tQ SectiQn 12-9A-14, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town
Code, to allaw for an amendment to the Approved Development Plan for Special
Developrnent District No. 21, Vail Gateway, located at 12 Vail RoadlLot hl & 0, Block 5D,
Vail Village 15t Filing, based upon the fallowing findings:
~ 3. That the proposed amentJment rneets the definition of a"rr}inor arnendment (staff
review)", pursuant to the provisions of Section 12-9A-2, Definitions, Vai{ Town
Code.
2. That the proposed amendmen# does not alter the basic intent and character pf
the appraved special development district.
3. That the proposed amendment is consis#ent with the design criteria af Article 12-
9A, Special Developmeni District, Vaii Town Code,
VI. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Architectural Plans
C. PubCic Notice
~
3
s
~ 777%~~ A°ttachment: A
f Wt yk a , y ~"T1Yr~ h: ~ ~rs ~`+•w~S~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ 4k` ~.~f 'e.
x^
Y ~ t t v
~ ~ ~ • ~ e
„
~'s
f y J ~ . .k ..ry t.• ~'N'~ 3
m +44
--'U'~~M'-
~
;
. . ~ .
e , iL
. ~
'r t .r~~"~w, rr } ~ "T~t~:• 4, t. ~ ~ 99_
~
i 7s ,.t. p.. .
+ i~ ,l t -A €'gc-
L ~
_ 1~~'~ ~.~I ~ 'e~ j~ ~ y_r' $E, r
r- 71~`~`.~~
S.~ -?'r~ -4 ~
~a ~ J ~ }?4 • ~ ~v .~a~K4,t ~
• " ~ ~m ;
~ ~ j ~ R 4 1~ ~S • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . o
r t t`~
w . s r,~°~~ ~ 4 ~.-r t 'S~ ~Y ~ l.~(~ ~ ~ ~ 'Sf. Y } 3
, ~ ~t; ~
;EJC
&wl if ~
y
. - ~+Aas'd"' ~.~9[ i
"~"~i'~~~~~,`~' ,d{, r ~ x•* h ~ ' . ~ _ ~ . ~
' +fYY~~,_ 'iCA'~'1'~~ aaiYl~" r .,..E'1~' ,'t.-'''T~ ~:..`v ~
_IF 7~
Q
oo'k
! . `4z ~ - ~t }~,bT'~r LE yr ]b a ~
.
. ,
i , .
•'T
41
$ ~t,A~', , .t~ ~R'.;°y ~+(,:~•V'~.
~ . 1 - : ' V ~~4'a1 ~ ?A .
~ ~ y~~,4 F ~ _ ~ii 9~' ~ ~ ~y _
` A
S ) ~ R
w
3C' A~~.
d
4, ~ 3 r"` ' 4 a4 - y~4
! .,s 4 ~ ~ ~~1 ` ~.~.Z~~.. ~ ~ 1` ' ~ S`• Yr^'!'~ n @ ~ '^~`J`3,~ ~
i `
7
~ pL
, 0
~
~ _+r 9 ~r~s.
7 u
~ c. ~ ~ . r . ~ y: 4~`ae. i„ ''s~ ~'i• - -
~ ~ ~y
r s r f
" '
f
~ f,A~.~ ~ ~ ~ •'~f f ~r 1r~/ f ,
t I ` ` ff r ~ f~~ " / ,f r I ~,f / ~ f {t J ~.c
' f f f ~ j /t•r ~ ~ j ~
1 f 7.Jl/ f! J f ' ~ ~t
, •
~
~ ~ f ~ j •a' a:~' °
oX
~ ~~o l„`C•~~1A~-. ~ ~
r
. ~ ~
CEE
t~
r
Q,d` ~
,.34S
D.Se ' c~~%~' ,yr>,
1.30,3
a
,
s~~, ~
rJ ?j. o
I' l
h'
r ~
~
r,
F,
<
ill-0 POSEP r, .
b.2' v
~ / / ~ ' ' ` r ~ rj /r 0.
o.s• a~ 4.z'
UNi~' CT1
449 sq. ft.
% ~,'r
'
9
'0'
a'- r f u
~
WALLS ADDED PER/`
SEE NQTE 4 5.2'
THfS SECQND AME~JDEd / 6 (
~ CONDOMINIUM PLAF 4 f ~ r 11N1T C-2
601 f SQ. ft.
EXiSTIlVG WALLSREMOVED
Bl' THIS SECOND AMENDED t
2.3' CONDOMINIUM PLAF
~r
z (DASHED TYPICA.L)
2,0' DIA. SEE NOTE 4
GOL~HSN ~i.~'~~ r .
34.3 =
Lei
F
UNIT C-3 F
7" , t
418 sq. ft,
8.2' Q 17.0' 2.8' 3.7'
-
i-
7- 7,
`,1J1~lIT 80i3NDARY L1NE /l p3
' EXTEBVDED BY THIS
f'~ f / ! ~ SECOND AlNENDED 't r ;r~
CQNDOMINI ' s''
CONDOMINIUM
PLAT
~ ~ f r ~.r ~ , f f r e ` , ' ~s , 1o- r . ~ r
/r / ~ / ~ e~'~f/ J ~f f ~ .f` r'` •,r' ~ r~ P r ~.'i
'f / 'f ,i~ ~ ~~/f / / . ff f, ~ f ,.F' ,~'f
r/ rr \ ! r` .r" ~ ` .r~ ,rr' F . • F ,r''
/ . / /r ~ , ~ £ '"~•r ~ ' 'O+ ,r 1 ` r#f ,r . A . p ,
~i ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ j c ~ / ~ !rr d r~.~ .rt 'F"~ r, tr ws ft ~
fi \ ! ? ..r ~ a~'~s~ ~~f fp ~ ~ .tN s„~„ ,y- 's' p..
~ ~,r / ~ ~ , °e
~,i J ~ ~ / a f , ~F .e~P, f: ~ t~ t 1..~ ~ . r d~ r.~ e"~ d' ~ ''1
, ~ ~ , r r~ ~'r rr r ~r~r~r``! , ~ ~ ~:fJ~ rw d' ~ , r ~ .
~ ~J•'`s,{` '~f ~J\~/~~
~ f~+~1 , ~ rr i , r" f r r'r. re~- P
X'\.~..f
fJ /J~ f fr L~,1 {r /f f!,~`• r\~ .r'~ :er rI` .r r v~ ar'~ 'P re' f J'`~ l,
! 1," ,J > ~ / ! / / ' ~ • ~ r., rf" t
tl
f~ ~ / r~~,? fr~ r: ~f ~ ~ t,, r fd'~ . ~ 1 8x" ~ ;.>r~ r el
t~~ / .r 6 ~/ir ,r~j~'/ ! ~ y r ~ a r .r 1 r f 't' `R'~ ? F d ,`y +A'~,~'r~. £ . ~,^A J~ ~ ~.r n c lq ~r~ rp '~rf ` y y f J r
i-
c
~ f ~ ~ F' rr ff r r.J ~F ~r f~ ~ J A ~+r ~ i ~ Fr rr' . .
~ ' ~ o! ! ~''t, , J+ r ~ \ fr r , F Ir r. f° ~f ~d•
`f f~~ /'~.~~--r'.~,? .^'~/i° f~\ a f~ a f = ~pl .~~~!`rfi r a~ T`\, r~ r r~ ,r p A~;f r ,
J ~~77" f ~ / fi~" ~ .J p'" • t.^~
~
2
/ I ' ! r • ,r' F
?f ~ / ?
' ~ . ~ r . e r , ~ fY ,r~ ~ r - :ii S .
I
COND0,11I1VIUM PLA7' F(7R
! ~ O-ATDOJIINIUMS
D VAIL VILL:AGE FIPST FILI_NG
'LE4T.A TE CJF C4L 4RAD D .
Gr^.APH1C SCALE
}o o a +o za
i ~ rf ti! ~
~ tn ec~ 1
1 ioch ~ ID fl.
f 6
~ :
I ~ •r.
. ~ E. :-j ^ N9 W. ft. ~ ~
~ i A.9' V V
~rA ~ _ . _ .~F
. . , e. _ _ . a.. ° " _ ' _ " _ _ ~ " _ ` _ ? ' . . _ .
sz. . ~ . . . - ..d; .
/f -u5 ADOEO YEN 5£E N6TE ~ ~ • y .
7w5 SECam -e1v[a u t3nl. C-i
CQMOW+~JY PII.T 001 sq. IL
. , 1 ' ~ - E7GSlXG F'AL'.91f?I[I~4D~
Br iw5 s[cDrn au[emCu
CCNOW+M4lr VLAY
i ~ (a.sNCO T~cx.)
` 7.9' p& SF.E N07[ 1
( f ~ C-0LYMH a~Y
- 7
UMIP C-.!
xr
W4i BWNPwar UME es
• ~ , ~ [%7[HpfO BY lMi
~ t _ _ _ _ _ :e ~ y . ~V SE;.FMD "ENbEO
f~ CopOWNNU PI*T
/
(~f t
- .A -
.
\ .4~ . . .
ti •
~ ~ \l
l~ `
i ~ 1 ~ ~ _ _ _ r _ _ ~ _ _ _ " ~ ~ . \ , ` . e.. . _ . , . _ . _ _ . a v .
1
. .
6 6
5EC17ND FzanR
~ SNFFT s af a N[7U3
,
I au orwEH9rnr5 sHOm u1E 50 NSUC 4F FIRSHED YA1LS
- SHEET 4 of 5
DfUwN BY: JF JOP Ko. 1116.1
Attachment: C ,
THIS tTEM MAY QFFECT YOUR PROPERTY ~
PUBLIC NOTlCE
NOTIGE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmera#al Commissian of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accardance with SectiQn 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on Apr'il 12,
2004, at 2:00 PM in the Town of Vail N9unicipaE Buildrng, in consideration of:
Report to #he Planning and Environmental Cornmission of an administrative action approving a
request for a minor amendment pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail ,
Tov+rn Code, to allow for an amendment to the Approved Development Plan for Special
C7evelopment Distric# No. 21, 'Jail Gateway, located at 12 Vail Road/Lot N & d, Black 5D, Vail
Village 15' Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereta ~I
Applicant: Vail Gateway Pkaza Condominiurra Assaciation, Inc., represented by Greg ,
Gastineau
Planner: Bill Gibson
The app[ications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's offiee, iocated at the Town af Vatl Community
Development Department, 75 Sauth Frontage Raad. The public is invited to aftend project
orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community
Development Department. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notifcatron. Please call 479- ~
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Qepartrnent I
Pubiished, March 26, 2004 in the Vail Daily_
~
~
T1MBERLIl"vTE C01'[MERCIAL REAL ESTATE
~
February 23, 2004
Bill Gzbson
Town of Vail
75 S. Frantage Road
Vai1, CO 81657
RE: Vail Gatevvay Ptaza Condominiums
Prapased Cando Map Amendment
Dear Bill.
The following is a list af the adjacent property owvners as required by aur application:
1. Village Inn Plaza Cnndominiums - Phase 1
c/o Slifer Managernent
143 E. Meadaw Drive, #360
Vail. CC? 81657
2. 'v'illage Inn Plaza Condominiums - Phase 2
~ c/o Slifer Management
143 E. Meadow Drive, #360
Vail, CQ 81657
3. Village Inn Plaza Condominiums - Phase 3
cJo Josef 5taufer
100 E. Meadow Drive, #31
Vail, CO $1657
4. Village Inn Plaza Condominiums - Phase S
clo Josef Staufer
laQ E. Meadow Drive, #31
Vail, CO 81657.
$ . ~~p r
5. Alpine Ventures hic., dba Alpine Standard
Jeff Moel?entine
2$ S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO $1657 I
I
6. 9 Vail Road
Hoiiday House Condominium Associatian
P.O. Sox 5733
17ai1, CO 81658 ~12 Vl1iL RC)AD, SU1TE: 600 VhIL, CC) 81657
970-476-1464 970-476-1986 FA X
,j
, .
Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium Assoc.
12 Vail Road, Suite 600
Vail, CQ 81657
~
~
~ y
I
Galorado Departrnent of Transportation
~
4201 E. Arkansas Ave., Roam 277
Denver, CC7 80222
-~-7-- . -
`
'
:
'
. . . . .
PLANNING AND ENVIROIVMENTAL CqMMISSlQN
~ PUBLIC MEETING
Monday, March 22, 2004
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Gary Hartman Ericicson Shirley
Doug Cahitl
Chas Bernhardt
Jnhns Scofteld
George Lamb
Ftollie Kjesbo
Site Vi$its : **NU LUNCH WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THIS MEETfNG"
1.
Driver:
NOTE: If the PEC hearing e7ctends until 6,40 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30
Rublic Hearing - Town Cauncif Chambers 2:00 pm
1. A request for a final review of a proposed amendment to the Town of Vail Otficiaf Zaning Map ta
change the zoning of the West Vail Lodge Properties from Commercial Core 3(CC3) to High
~ Density Multiple Family (HDMF), located at 2278, 2288, 2298 Chamonix Lane and 2211 North
Frontage Raadl Lots 1, 2, 3, and Tract C Vai! Das Schane Filing 1 and Inn at Wes# Vail Lot 1, Block
A, Vai! Qas Schone Filing 3, in accordance with Section 12-3-7, Vail Town Code, and set#ing forth
details in regard theretv.
App1icant: Vanquish Vail, LLC, represented by Aflison Ochs
Planner: Matt Gennett
Recommendation of Deniat
MOTIC)M1l: Doug Cahill SECOND: Gary Hartman VOTE: 6-0
CQNQITIONS:
Matt Gennetf made a presentation per the staff memorandum indicating that staff continued to
recommend denial of the ret}uest #o rezone the property. Staff informed the Commission that in
spite of the Commissian's explicit directian from the preVious meeting, that the applieant had
again requested that the reznning be #abCed by the Cammtssion to allow far additional time #o
revise the appEicatian. Faliowing pub1ic input on the application, the GQrnmission members ~
indicated that they couid not vote in support of the rezoning request as the request did not comply
, with the goals and objectives of the Vai{ Land Use Plan and the Zaning Regulatians. The
Commission rnernbers further expressed their disappointrr7ent with the applicant stating that the
applicant had clearly abused the pracess, wasted valuable time, and failed to even attempt to
cooperate with the Commission and staff when the Commission and staff had made every
aftempt to work with the applicant's needs.
~
2. Informatian Update
~ i
3. Adjournrnent
1 _ *VAIL
T04V~1` 4
MC)TION: Doug Cahill SECQND: Gary Hartman VQTE: 6-0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for ,public inspection during ~
regufar office hours in the project planner's office Iocated at the Town af Vail Community
Deve{oprrtent Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for infarmatic,n.
Sign language interpretation availabfe upon request with 24 hour notifieation. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing Irnpaired, for informatian.
Cammunity Deveiaparient Qepartment ~
Published, Mareh 5, 2004 in the Vail Daify.
w
~
,
~
2 _
.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
~ PUBLlC MEETING
Monday, March 8, 2004
PRQJECT QRIEN'TATiQN - Community Development Dept. PIJBLIC WELCQME 12:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
John Schofeld Gary Hartman
Ericksan Shirley
Chas Bernhardt
Rotlie Kjesho
Doug Cahill
George Lamb
Site Visits :
1. Slifer - 230 Bridge Street
2. Hughes - 303 Gore Creek Driwe, #7
3. Shirley -3Q3 Gore Creek Drive, #8
4. Yare - 2434 Chamonix Lane ~
5. Vail Resorts Dewelopment Company - Tract K, Glen Lyon ~
Driver: George
NQ7E: If tYre PEC hearing extends unti! 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 6:30
~ Public Hearina - Town Council Ghambers 2.00 pm
1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Tar+vn Gvuncil for the establishment af Special
Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, ta allow for the redevelopment of the IVlanor Vail
Ladge, and a request for a eanditional use permit to allaw for the eonstruction of Type II I
Employee Housing Units, pursuant ta Section 12-61-1-3, Vail Tawn Cade, lacated at 595 Vail
Ualley Drive/Lats A, B, & C, Vaal Village 7th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Manor Vail, represented by Melick anci AssocEates
Planner. Warren Campbell
M4TI4N: Lamb SEGOND: Bernhardt VDTE: 6-0
Tahled to April 12, 2004
Staff reviewed the memorandum and a letter provided by Jirri Lamont, Vai1 Village Mameowner's
Association, fram Fredrick Wyman III, President of All Seasans Candominium Association. The
applicant reviewed the goals of the project and displayed multiple visuai simulatians of the proposal
and how it affected different views.
Jim Larnont camplimented the wisual simula#ions and then expressed concern about the proposed
paeking structure within the required setback from fU'lifl Creek. Mr. Laman# also expressed cancern
about the parking lot access and asked why the loading and delivery was not covered. He asked
about emplayee housing in the parking struc#ure and whether it could be maved. He suggested
putting it over the loading and delivery area, Mr. Lamont asked about pubic imprawements and
whether there were ather pubic improuernents that could be required oT should be required. Jim
~ Lamont indicated that improuing access to Ford Park could be pursued.
The Carrsmission eommented that the setback from Mill Creek +rvas a concern and the prpflsed
1 ~k l
T4W.h'+0~ y~IL ~
parking structure should be pulled away. There was also general concern over the access to the
prapased parking structure. The new floor on Building "C" was identified as a concern as the heigh#
~ would b9ock a large portion of #he uiew to the Gore Range. The new floor increased the height by
appraximately 22 fieet. It was suggested that Building "G° shauld taper down to Vail Vafley Raad.
There needs to be some planting pockets loeated on top of the parking structure to prauide winter
interest. The existing trees along the bike path shauld remain. The refocatian of the access gate
further nat the property from its current loeatian will help circulation an Vail 1/alley Road. There was
some indifference about covered laading and delivery and its value as a public benefit. The
proposed new units shauld not be required to be placed in a rental pooL The Commission asked the
applicant rnrhy they uuanted so much filoor area and questioned where the public benefits were in the
project which would warrant such a large increase over the maximum GRFA permitted. The
Commission liked the turn-around area prnvided 4ff of Vail Vailey Drave on the sauth lot and the
pro{aosed garden on tap of thte parking structure. The Commission stated that they liked the plan
from a year ago when a variartce for GRFA ta be laca#ed within a setback was being t'equested.
The applicant was directed to remave all impravements frorn the 100-yearfloodpEain. Irnpeovernents
to Mill Creek couid be a significant pliblic improvement. The Commission concluded by requesting a
complete application with na more work sessians. Staff was direeted to revie?nr the next submittal for
completeness very thoraughly. The Commission acknowledged that the photography simufation
used in the presentation worked bett+er than a model. However, the photos need to be realistic
about landscaping and uvhat is impacted with development.
2. A request for final review of a Wariance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, Section 92-6H-10:
Landscaping and Site Oevelopment, and Section 12-6H-11; Parking and Loading, Vail Town
Cade, to a'dlow for a residential addition, located at 303 Gore Greek DrivefLot 7, Block 5, Vail
Village 1" Fifing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
~ Applicant: Ron Hughes, represented by Shepherd Resources, Inc.
Planner: Bill Gibsan
MOTIDN: Kjesbv SECDNQ: Bernhardt VOTE: 5-0A (Shirley abstained)
APPROVED WITH aNE CONdITION:
This variance request approval shall be contingent upan the applicant receiving
7awn of Vail design review approval fvr this proposed residential addition.
Due to the similar nature of the applications, items #2 and #3 (Hughes aesidence and Shirley
Residence) were reviewed concurrently.
Staff presented an overview of the request and the staff memorandum.
The applicant's architect, Shepard Resaurces, Inc., had no additional commen#. The
applicant's attorney, fVlurray Franke Greenhouse List & Lippitt LLP, stated their abjection to
Staff's recomrnended condition #2 for the Hugh's prapcasal,
Virginia Wel9s, adjacent property owner Rowhouse #6, stated that they did not support the Hugh
Residence variance request and did not support the final design of the praposal. Ms. We91s
requested fhat the PEC adapted and broaden the language of Staff's recomrnenc#ed canditian
#2 for the Hugh's proposal.
Commissioner Shirley stated his objection to Staff's recomrnended candition #2 for his
proposal.
~ The PEC noted the special circumstances and hardships related to the Hughes and Shirley
variance requests. The PEC noted that Staff s recammended condition #2 was no# necessary
as any risk of constructifln impacting neighboring proper#ies would be addressed bythe existing
private party-wall agreements.
2
3. A request for final review of a Wariance from Section 12-61-1-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6H-9, Site
Coverage, and Section 12-61-1-1 Q: Landscaping and Site Development 11'ail To+run Gode, #o allowv for
~ a residential addition, located at 303 Gore Creek DrivelLot S, Block 5, Vail Village
15t Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
applicant: Ericksvn Shirfey, represented by K.H. Webb Architects P.C.
Planner: Bill Gibson
MOTI(?N; Kjesbo SECOhID: 8ernhardt VQTE: "y1 (Shirley abstained)
APPRQVED WITH OIVE CONDITION:
1. This variance request approval shall be cantingent upon the applicant receiving
Town of Vail desEgn review approval for this prnposed residential addition.
4. A request for final review af a varianGe from Sectian 12-6D-6, setbacks, Vail Town Code, ta allov+r far
encroachments into the setback, located at 2434 Ghamonix Lane/Lgt 11, Block B, Vail das Schone
Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereta.
Applicant: Mark Yare, represented by VAG, Inc.
Planner: Bifl Gibson
IVIC3T'NON: Cahill SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 6-0
DENIED
Staff presented an overview of the request and the staff memarandum.
The applicant's architect, VAg, Inc., summarized the applicant's request and noted their
willingness to decrease the arrlaunt deuiation from the setback be9ng requested.
* Karen Scheadeger, adjacent property owner, stated that they did nat support the Yare's variance
request.
The Gorramission commented that the existing aspen stand did canstitute a hardshEp. The PEC
noted #hat design alternatives camplying with the setback requiremenfs exist and the trees can
be removed ar relocated.
5. A request for fFnal review of a variance fronn 7itle 14, Development Standards Handbook, Vail Tawn
Code, ta allow fer retaining waals in excess of six (6) feet in height, bcated at Tract K, Glen Lyon
5ubdivision arrd Unplatted Parcels, a rnore complete legaf descriptian is on file at the Gommunity
Qevelopment Department, setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Resorts Qevelopmen# Company, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Bill Gibsan
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb I/C)TE: 6-0
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS:
1. This variance request approrral shall be contingent upan the applicant receiving
Town of Vail design review approval of #he associated design reaievu application.
2. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall enter into a lease,
license, or easement agreement with the Town af Vail for the use of Town
property.
~ 3. Priar to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare a
constructian staging plan #or review and approval by the Town of Vail.
4. Prior to the issuance af a grading permit, #he applicant shall survey and tMen
3
} - _
install all limits af disturbance fencing and all erosion control methods for review
and appraval by the Town of Vail.
~ 5. The applicant shall properly maintain the limits of disturbance fencrng and
erosian cantrol nnethods throughout the construction of this prapasal. Any
modifcafian to the lacation or configuration of the limits of disturbance area shall
require review and approval by the Town of Vail.
S#aff presented an overview of #he request and the sfaff memorandum.
The applicant"s representative, Jay Peterson, summarized the applicant's propasal and
requested minor changes #o Staff srecommended canditians. Staff was agreeabEe to the
requested changes to the conditions.
The PEC commented on the special circumstances and hardship of this request and raoted that if
the proposed walls were construeted in a Town reght-of-way, rather than in a Tawn granted
easement, that this variance request uvould not be necessary.
6. A request for a recammendatipn to the Vail Town Cauncil far a taxt amendment to Section 12-
71-1-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor or Street Level and Section 12-71-3, Permitted
and Conditional Uses; First Floor and Street Level, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail
Town Cade, to allow fflr temporary real estate sales offices on the #irst floor or stree# level af a
building, in the Lionshead Mixed Use I& 2 zone distrccts, and setting for#h details in regard
thereto.
Applicarat: Vail Resarts Development Company, represented by Braun Assflciates, Inc_
Planner: George Ruther
~ MOTION: SECOND; VOTE:
W1THaRAWIV
7, A request tor a site coverage variance from Section 12-713-15, Site CQVerage, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a commercial store front additbon, located af 230 Bridge Street/Lat Br Block 5-C, Vail Vilfage
1St Filing, and setting forth details in
regard thereto.
Applicant: Rodney E. S!i#er
Planner: Warren Campbefl
MOTION: Lamb SECON[3: Kjesbo VOTE: 5-9 (Cahill opposed)
APPROVED WITH ONE CONDITION:
1. That the applicant reduces the size af the proposed awning to extend na more
than four feet from the face of the lauilding.
StafF gaWe a presentation per the rnemorandum. The applicant and the owner of the business
which will be occupying the tenant space, Tom Yoder, gave a presentation explaining the need
to rernoue the architectural "notch" from the building due to the way it breaks-up the interior re#ail
space which is the reason previous tenants have not be able to "make-it" in #he space. They
cantinued by descrabing the notch as a healfh hazards as peaple late at night urinate and vomit
in the "notch". Rad Slifer reviewed the application and how the applicatian would comply with
the gaals af the Master Plan and haw the praposal is not aspe+cial privilege.
~ The Comrnissian was in favor of granting the variance as the nc+tch does not serve a
positi+re purpcase. They agreed strongly about the negative health issues associated
with the unintended consequences of the notch being there (i.e. public urination and
vorniting). Many of the Cammissioners believed this was a special case which had a
hardship due to the age of the building and it's existence prior to Town of Vail zoning.
4
Commissioner, dolig Cahill asked how this will help the retail space and aehieve the goafs the
applicant stated at the outset. The applicant replied that he is primarily interested in the exterior
mo+difications and wili uvork out the inter€or remodel issues aiter getting the variance.
~ Staff asked for a point of clarifcation regarding the awning and whether the PEC agrees with the
additianal site coverage it creates. The Commissioners, except for +Chas '8ernhardt, sta#ed that
dhe awning shauld nQt esctend any further fram the face of the building than four feet so as ta not
count towards site coverage.
8. A request for a final review of a propased amendment to the Town of Vail Official Zoning Map to
change the zoning of the VVest Vail Lodge Properties from Commercial Core 3(CC3) to High Densi#y
Multiple Family (HDMF), lacated at 2278, 2288, 2298 Chamonix Lane and 2211 hJorth Frontage Road/
Lats 1, 2, 3, and Tract C Vail Das Schane Filing 1 and !nn at West Vail Lot 1, Block A, Vail Das
Schane Filing 3, in accardanca with Section 12-3-7, Vail Town Ccrde, and setting farth cEetails in regard
thereta,
Applicant: Vanquish Vail, LLC, represented by Affison Ochs
Planner: Matt Gennett
MQTION: Bernhardt SECUNQ. Lamb Vt7TE: 6-0
TABLED TQ MARCH 22, 2004.
The Commissian unanimausly agreed that this shall be #he last tabling ta be granted for
this item,
9. A request for a work session to discuss an application for a majar amendment to Special
Uevelopment L`7istrict #4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Vai! Towr? Cade to
. allow for t[he adoption of a development Plan for the development of a neuv multiple-farniiy
structure, located at 1000 W. Frontage Rd./Cascade Village, Development Area A, and setting
forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Ramsey Flower and Greg Walton
Plannere George Ruther
WITHQRAWN
10. A request for a recommendatian ta the Vail Town Council of a major amendment to Special
DeWelapment Distric# No. 38, Four Seasons Resort, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Vail Town
Cade, ta allow for a mixed-use hotel; a request for a final review of a conditianaf use permit,
pursuant to Sectian 12-7A-3, Vail Town Cade, to allow for Type 111 Employee Housing Units and
a fractivnal fee club; and a request for a recommendatian to the Vail Town Cauncif of a
propased rezoning of Lots 9A & 9C, Vail Village 2nd Filing from Rublic Accammadation (PA)
zone district to High Density Ar'lultiple Family (HDMF) zorte district, located at 28 S. Frantage Rd.
and 13 Vail Road/Lots 9A& 9C, Vail Village 2nd Fi4ing, and setting forth detai{s in regard thereta.
Applicant: Nicollet Island Development Cvmpany Inc.
Planner: George Ruther
WITHDRAWN
11. Appraval of minutes
MOTION: Kjesba SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0
12. Inforcnation Update
~ 0
13. Adjaurnment
MUTIOW: Bernhardf SEGOND: Larnb VC}TE: 6-0
5
~
~ The applications and informatian about the praposals are available for public inspeetion during
reguEar offce haurs in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Communiry
Development Department, 75 Sauth Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Cammunity Develmpment Department
Published, March 5, 2004 in the Vail daiVy.
~
i
~
6
,
i
~ ME 0F YAI~ '
THlS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
P'UBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GlVEN #hat the PEanning and Environmental Cammission of the Town of
Vail will hald a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6, Vail TQwn Code, on Apri[ 12,
2044, at 2:00 PM in the Town Qf 1r'ail Municipal Building, in considera#ion of:
A request for final review of a variance pursuant to Section 12-6D-8, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
ta allow for a new primarylsecondaryr residence to encroach into the front and side setbacks ancf i
a vananee from Chapter 10, Off-street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Gode, to aflaw for
required parking to be lacated within the public right-of-way, located at 2830 Basingdale
Blvd.fLot 5, B1ock 9, Vail Intermauntain, and setting forth detaiEs in regard fhereto.
Applicanf: W.L. Broer Construction
Planner: IUfatt Gennett
Ob
A request for a minor exteriar alteratiora pursuant to Sec#ion 12-76-7, Exterivr Alteratiorss Qr
Modificatians, lfail Tawn Code, to aClaw for a commercial addition to the Slifer Building, iocated
at 230 Bridge StreetlLot B, Block 5, Vail Village 1't Filing, and setting fvrth de#ails in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Slifer Building, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbefl
~ A request for a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-16, Conditianal Use Permits, Vail
Town Code, to allow for a ternporary seasonal structure within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zane
disteict, located at 715 West Lionshead CirclelLots 4& 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3`d Filing and
Lots C& D, Marcus Subdivision, and sefting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Carporation; represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: V1larren Campbell I
A request for conditional use permit pursuant tv Section 12-7E-4, Conclitional Uses, Vail Tawn
Gode, for an amendment to the existing private club {i.e. parking club} condi#ional use perrnit,
lacated at 12 Vail Road (Vail Gateway)/Lots N & O, Block 5D, Vail ViElage 'lst Fi3ing, and setting
for details in regard fhereto.
Applicant: Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium Associafion, lnc., represented by Greg
Gastineau
Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a variance from Section 12-21-14, Restrictions In Specific Zones On Excessi+re
Slopes, Vaif Town Code, to allow for the construction of driveways and surface parking in excess
of 10% o# the total site area, located a# 2388 Garmisch Drive/Lot 9, Block G, Vail Das Sehone
2 nd FIIIIIg, and setting forth details in regard thereta.
Applicant: Snow Nvw, LLC
Planner: 1Narren Campbell '
A request for a work sessian to present an ovenriew of the proposeci redevelopmen# plans for the
Lionshead Care 5ite Hotel, located a# 675 Lionshead Place/(a camplete [egaf de5criptiQn af the
proposed develapment site is available at the Town af Vail Community Qevelopment Department upon
~ request), and setting for details in regard thereta,
Applicant: Vail Corporation
Planner: Gearge Ruther
The appPications and inforrnatian about the proposals are a+raiEable for public inspection during regular
ofFice hours at fhe Tawn of Akommunity Developmen# Departmeno South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the pubiic hearing in the
Tawn of Vail Community Develapment Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 tor additional
Enformatian.
Sign Ianguage interpretation is available upon request with 24-haur notification. Please call ~
(970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, far anformation.
Published March 26, 2004, 9n the Vail Daily.
~
i
~ I
~
;
;
i
~
v-co oX~d ~0ro~~ 2 e3 mb nOm ~ ocmg0~ • ~.~~$ro'S mL~~~~P y~~a~Wmc mo'o
~3°04 ~mi~~~ ua 3'm- ~ Q y~~ >~oMYgm o~ WccO.4 r~
au c o ~ c mN=
g-~g- ro- ~ ~v `~'U m a E5
w c~„~_c m =o, ~
i1 c?u±m._ ~ `Q z
~~~n 8 arn~ ysm[m 3~ $.=m
E~N E2 a cvx~x~p o'- ~
N L~ ~ th N ~ LA ~C U y C~J Nr C C C
F c o«~.~d' ~ ~ g3 r'~ m~m » ~°u a~C+- ~'o,m~•- ~'c3 aE
o ~ m ~ ~ a.
+g- o ~ ~~o•- m ec~ y-- = _ z . E n o a
FO oc ~i Umm~v~"cnm a.o"-rgo aJ
3 m o c 9Ec--~o a.° ~mE
a ay? '~;Ka o c~ca0_~ ~.°~h' s m ~ ~ oo nmw
U $ 3,~m"} O~ m m`0`mrc U m
~~8ryrim ~oa~ ° m'~+vu~ar m €~d.3 o.mdm~Q-s ~J$aUs~om 'm
m W7urt~~ oEm;' a ~ o a o
N,occ, c_ a oon9ay - oad-Am2 o~„on i. y-o
2 ~
c,t
a¢S s0 7 ms~~ c 10 a m ~ N C c0~
~ p m'~qm-oo --m= 2 da ,~zlt4m m s~ c .tT a ns. _°t~C7zg~-°' mm-m0.5 E
~y
~1SmC~'+p,~ ~y¢ CnF pg0~
~.m
~ R7 91 v,~_''~ ~ 1(6f0 O~U .'EC7~9t~ONCJ`~~~ 6~UCm0~dZOU C ~ j W... p'r Oy 'P~dC-O~~`'~- N
W~~ >'=o,
Ol E'vU.` ~ rim5 ~mc~AN 6C7 u'~ m T ov w o` -c aCV
y ~C7 cp u~ °a ~ n ~ ~ '^m E S.~ ca'p m m~ c 0
'Q ~n U m.°r.p5 oL -c'~ Een¢rom.e--~aC7 m c -°`m ~nuoE'~ c?~ Eo0 L
tuwo L m~o
3 c ~`4 ~'~tF tSo:c Ei`' m o~"` 3 E c s~' o., ~n
Q D F m c~i~ ~bm w-'JU7~ c~~.> ii~ my£~ ~mo~~m~i qp` (,J•-. ~J'C~ ~Bw~ ~a L i
Qn v~~.~E ~ $ m3 m ~~aCy` v"~ ~ I So ~ ~N~ ~
C-_F~ S~ ~1f~ ~O O a Oj Q ~ 4 N~ ~N7a1 e -a'F} ~ m ~ ~4~ N'_ ~ v!L o ~q' ~ ~
m tnm9~~~ ~ actE}~~~y~ cvmmnj~y«d ..r a ~ C o>'.~.~-s_ ~~ti w~~~ ~ v~tc~~H~ g m~go ~
~ 'c0afv ..4m ocvo°o6c`4r~ ~o9°~~ ~~8~a.mao 3~`° m
O Uon<sic~ ~ ooL -
~~~`m~~o~o ~
~ ~b~- m ~ m a~ g c.ov~°va~ ct~'.caa+ -pn~ c am c~' m~c~ r~n.C a~ "u•~}'m o ar o 3 o m ~ o o ma~ c_ ~vo~ n a i
o m` o.a..co.W am,~ a¢fnQ~E¢~ ~m'~~i~m5
~$n. au~~ ~ ~
m ~aa acnt~~ ~Rm~ c~a~a U. 8 '<n
i
s
~
QP I.T.i C) 0 ~ .
".0
C
r-
o a
~.~n on a ~ u o
~
o q v td :r, ~ ~ ~ Ul
~
O ~ ca ~0 i.+
~ y` n
-
>,L z (U E Q
y I
~ ~ f 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ a Z
bio
cr
a~r ~-0 3~ ° N g a Js ~ •U ~
~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ 7~J fy N ~ ~ • ~ ~
0.
IU
a-~
C..~ ~,U ,-~n a" ~ ~ S." N ~ Q
G3 7~ • ^ ~
7 c3 ~ ~ ~ Lr 7) 4
ot e~CJ
Q
a" ~ ~U 0 ~ ~ O u L ~
7
7~
r 7 t G:1 3 ~ ~ Vv~ ~ ~ ~
sr a.+ 0~ T7 ~ 'J G y ~ ~ J i
sC o It , .b ~ ! ~ ~ ~ •
w
LA ~
Q/y 3 ' ~ ~ K c+. • > ~ ~ ~ a ~
~ O j
~ ~ Q„
~ 'S+~ ~ 'z7 C G ~ 6} Q~?
r-°7~
o,y
LrI
~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ 3
'u
o. :a y - _ a
a. f p
;
7~
C ~
n.F ~
Zn