Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-1122 PECPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION • • PUBLIC MI=EYING Tf}WN(~'IiA~`+~ Monday, November 22, 2004 PROJECT ORIENTATION -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC'UIIELCOME ~~:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT Doug Cahill Chas Bernhardt George Lamb Rollie Kjesba David Viele Anne Gunion Bill Jewtt MEMBERS ABSENT Slte Visits: 1. One Willow Bridge - 100 Willow Bridge Road Driver: George NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:OOp.m., the Commission may break for dinner from 6:00- fi:30p. m . Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm A request for final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Tawn Code, and a variance from Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Cade, to allow for revisions to the previously appraved development plan for Qne Willow Bridge Road (previously Swiss Chalet), located at 100 Willow Bridge Roadffracts K & L, Block 5E, Vasil Village First Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Qne Willow Bridge Road, represented by Resort Design, Inc. Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 7-0-0 George Ruther presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum. The applicant, Mike Foster, stated that he was available for questions or comments. Chad Salli and Tom Kassmel, Town of Vail Public Works Department, were also available far questions and comments. The PEC questioned why the elevations of the various floor heights changed.. Mike Foster explained the design rational for the proposed changes. The Commission noted that this proposal proactively addressed streetscape and drainage issues that were raised by the Town of Vail after the original approval of this project. There was no public comment. • 2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text amendments to Section 12-3-3(E}, Appeal of Town Council Decisions, and setting.. forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Matt Mire Planner: George Ruttier ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Jewiitt VOTE:?-0-8 George Rather presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum. The Commission had no comment or discussion, There was no public comment. 3. A request for final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-~, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a Type II Employee Housing Unit, located at 4812 Meadow Lane/Lot 8, Block 7, Bighorn Fifth Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Bighorn LLC and the Duane F. Rogers Revocable Trust, represented by Larry Benway Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approved, with conditions MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 7-0-0 CONDITIONS: 1 } This condi#ional use permit approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail approval of the related design review application. 2) Prior to final design review approval, the applicant shall revise the plans to illustrate a minimum of 75 sq.ft. of additional storage. 3) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall execute a Type II EHU deed restriction with the Town of Vail Department of Community Development to permanently restrict the use of the EHU for employee housing. Bill Gibson presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum. Larry Benway, applicant's representative, presented the revised floor plans showing. the required additional storage for the proposed Type II EHU. There was no public comment. The Commission emphasized the Town's need to address the current EHU enforcement issues and allow Type II EHUs as permitted uses, rather than conditional uses. 4. A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Tawn Gode, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition located at 2389 Chamonix LanelLot 11, Block A, Vail Das Schane Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Robert Stephanoff, represented by Jack Snow, RKD Architects Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approve with conditions MOTION: Kjesbo SEGOND: Lamb VOTE:7-0-tD CONDITIONS: 1) This variance request approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail approval of the related design review application. Bill Gibson presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum. Jack Snow, architect, and Bob Stephanoff, applicant, presented an overview of the existing conditions of property and the details of the proposal. There was no public comment. Commissioner Kjesbo disclosed his former business relationship with the applicant, but. Hated that he had no conflict of interest in reviewing this application. The Commission was complimentary of the design and architecture of the proposal. The Commission recognized that this proposal is an addition to an existing non-conforming house and was not new construction or ademo-rebuild. The Commission noted the existing conditions and circumstances associated with this proposal which justify a variance and do not create a grant of special privilege. The Commission questioned the applicant about the degree of the variance requested and any alternatives which were explored.. The applicant explained the design options they had considered and the option of maximizing the allowable site coverage with GRFA and then requesting a larger site coverage variance for a future garage addition. The Commission noted that this request was comparable to other site coverage variances previously approved by the Town. The Commission did not believe approval of this request would create a precedent. The Commission commented that the approval of variances similar to this request provide flexibility and incentives for redevelopment of existing properties that are difficult to renovate. The Commission noted that approving this request as proposed created a mare attractive design than could be achieved by making minor reductions to the amount of site coverage being requested. The Commission commented that the site coverage variance being requested was for a garage and small cantilevered elements. The Commission believed that while this request allows for a deviation from the allowable site coverage numbers, it does meet the intent of the site coverage regulations. 5_ A request for revision to the final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Tawn Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area, located at 1(?94 Riva GIenlLot 4, Spraddle Creek Estates, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: 1N&B Development, LLC, represented by Tim Losa, zehren and Associates, Inc. Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: Tabled to December 13, 2004 MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE:. ~-a-a fi. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council an a proposal to establish Special Development District No. 39, pursuant to Article 12-9{A), Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of Crossroads, a mixed use development; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-2-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3- 7, Amendment, to add a definition for bowling alley; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, to add bowling alleys as a conditional use; and requests for conditional use permits to allow for the construction of an outdoor operation of the accessary uses as set forth in Section 12-7E-5 (ice skating rink); a major arcade to include indoor entertainment; a theater, meeting roams, and convention facilities; multiple-family dwellings and lodges; and a private club to allow far the establishment of a for sale parking club, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Vail Town Code, located at 141 and 143 Meadow DrivelLot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing. 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Crossroads East One, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to December 13, 2004 MOTION.: Bernhardt SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE:7-0-0 • • 7. A request far a final review of a variance, from 'Section 12-6G-8, Density Control, Vail Tawn Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Cade, to allow for additional gross residential floor area and dwelling unit, located at 4696 Vail Racquet Glub DriveNail Racquet Club Condos, and setting for#h detail in regard thereto. Applicant: Racquet Club Owners Association, represented by TRD Architects Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: Tabled to December 13, 2004 MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Kjesba VOTE:7-0-0 8. Approval of November 8, 2044 minutes MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Kjeabo VOTE:7-0-0 9. Information Update 10. Adjournment MOTION: Lamb SECOND: Viiele VOTE:7-0-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970} 479-2356, Telephone far the Flearing Impaired, far information. Published, November 19, 2044, in the Vail Daily, O ~ ~ ~ O E N ~ Q m ~. C ~ a ¢ b c~u K m a ~y U W W ~ ~ 3 G~ E Q QO tl Z c1 o ~ O u' ~ f- ~ m y O a ~ ~ °' ~~ 7 ~^ Y '~'~ Z ~ W ~ N w m m (7 Z ~ ~a ~ o U m W •°-° ~ p~ ~ mm ~O i iL m W C oa ~~ ae vwa m i my ttl ~O a uUi ¢, a ~MWNy `~W~6~T~ cm~m ~~QyQLD y ~~~~~Pi H p E~ C F W r ~ m g 7 O G.' t0 ~~ J~ b f: D C~ ~.' 7 O 9}~ ~~@ pp O C O~ m E~~v ~m£ S ~-Q-°~ryt~~mc~ mU.v~J~ ~ ~6 ~~ _G o~~ O pV~~^c~¢~C7 ~ '.cc~[la ~ ~ ai W OW 'Si ~`2~a~ U ~ C~?f rnw.J= W yQrnL l$ N w~~~ Hs^, C7~ UWi ~3 o+~mm ~,~ cn c.~U ~r~j ia'g .~ °a ~' a~ L^ ~ e'n'd .S m n~ -~~~ ~ .. ZZ v'~ e c y LZZ ai aa~~ ~L mu. G mZ0 V ~o W q ~© ~~oi° Qm~OC a.: vimmp~cm Q1- v°~~N aa~11 ~m:~0 o ~~vi ca-r w~- co'am am O ~ ~~Qa 4'rt `U~'o $~~~~ ¢Eao~~40~d¢~ a,nn'~b' d c~N ~ ~- ~ E~U O ~~ mW v 00 ~t 0 h- cpa ~a ~m~ ~'~~~ c taL EC1 ~ ~=UF"~v c...r3 } 2 '~ U "ZZ mr}o c-F ~UL` e. d ~ y ~.~. c7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ a' o •,~ ~ •~ Cwi ~ ~ ~ O U k ~ G3 ~ ~ In ~ ~ ~ c~c ice. v, G3, o a~ c~ ~, ~ c 3 ~ a ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ i ~ ~ • a ~ ~ b G ~ LLa ~ O ~ •~ ~ cd V ~ ~+. O ~ O ~ .~ w A Y .ty 3 ~ G ¢~ O_ O ..~. 4=. cd ^i L." rC ~ ~ ~ ~ `> .., 'G C '~ .~ 'ti .c ~' ~ 3 s ~ ~. `~ ~ ~ •~~ ~~ ~ ~ c 3 ,-~ er ~` ~ •- c~ a~ .~ ``` ~ "CI O. ~ U cn ~ ~ O ~ O ca ~ a.3 ~ ~ ~ r.. .~ o y ~ ~ ~ W ~ _ `~ ~ w L 0 W ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ o z ~~~~~.~,~~ s AC E-s Q A~ ' ~ ~ • ~ -~ ~ .c o .~ ~ 4. O '~ ~n C3 :.~ ~_ .~` R, 0 a~ 0 0 b N N p bb A N }_ C~ ~ C ~~ N O ~ ~ n J ~ r.?.~om CJ Cr n .~ ui a'~ C.~~~~ ~J 90C ~ 4~ ~ p@W Om~ O~~OU O©~ma7Lq N~ O~ m - C C N ~ A ~~$46 ~ NO"aL N~m~7 aUU S~ ~~ 61n1a¢o~ o .w ~P~ C ~ MO flj ~cm v ` ~~r ~~"~'~ ~i ~H w['J ° z/J az ti c N r ~. c+ d' z L .~ x O .~ .~ C] U ~o ~;y a 9 ~ J G, q J ] ry ~ GaY N ® ~ t' C r~~ ~ `L~ u ~~~ y„ o,}ta~ Cam- w~~~>~N O~LL ~ [~ ~~a aid `~ ~ 9 $'"'7t`~.''nw=c~n m = °~ a~ ~" ~~? ~~U w~2 ¢'3 ~O ~' ~~ W ~QA ~ ~ ~ ~' n CSi. P .S ~ 0 C u ` '~mCmNO m~'®O ?~ m N ~~ yy s~ m,~~ m~3~ ~ lTS m~~ 9 U vfn °~pQ9O.~. ~C~ ~ NNOl6 ~N ~o n.. ~CNt~~U fli ~~`yz""'Z Oo© ° ' ~ °3 m ~pm °' 0. p cH d° ~ ~ aN¢ mU Q~Q. S°v~ 4dHd¢ rob F-~ p ~ = O ~C~mp~y.~.'U~ i~i°Fp-3 C~(~rJ' ~4~ ~ Z © ~O ~ 6 3 u CC ~z ~p o ~ CNJ ~ U O ~E® w L` ~ n~~ QZ~ 0 0 > > °z z m~ vQ A 6tn (dJ 7 ~ C a ~Z ~~ ~Q ~O ap ~~ ~~ ¢~ ~ ppQ ~O. ~O S .~VtL ~p M '~ ~ -~ c at a c4 o a~ spap t~ a 2~°~' W:C OV}~~j?C ~U3r az~E~ ~aF :o.°ov' ~°r vro~Un C p ~ CI~.U .m ~o~Na~a1~ ~m.~°°>~mCam ~m a roa ~y N Y N p .~ a my~ c~~ ~~~ j 3 .,may ~ ~ffi~ 3 ~1 ~e c 0 c m a 2 a PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL. COMMISSION '`~'` PUBLIC MEETING ~. ?~~1't~~'Y~~' Monday, November 22, 2004 PROJECT ORIENTATION - Community De~elapment Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:00 pm MECv3BERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visits: 1. One Willow Bridge - 100 Willow Bridge Road Dri+rer: George NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until ~:OOp.m., the Commission may break far dinner from 6:00- 6:30p.m. Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 prn 1. A request for final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a variance from Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the previously approved development plan for One Willow Bridge Road {previously Swiss Chalet), located at 100 Willow Bridge RoadlTracts K & L, Block ~E, Vail Village First Fling, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: One Willow Bridge Road, represented. by Resar# Design, Inc. Planner. George Bother ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 2. A request far a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text amendments to Section 12-3-3{E), Appeal of Town Council Decisions,. and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Matt Mire Planner: George Ruttier ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 3. A request for final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-OD-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Gode, to allow for a Type II Employee Housing Unit, located at 4812 Meadow Lane/Lot 8, Block 7, Bighorn Fifth Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Bighorn LLC and the Duane F, Rogers Revocable Trust, represented by Larry Benway Planner; Biil Gibson ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: • 4. A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition located at 2339 Chamonix Lane/Lot 11, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Robert Stephanoff, represented by Jack Snow, RKD Architects Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5. A request €or revision to the fina6 plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area, located at 1094 Riva GlenlLot 4, Spraddle Creek Estates, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: W&B Development, LLC, represented by Tim Losa, ~ehren and Associates, Inc. Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: Tabled to December 13, 2004 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Fi. A request far a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a proposal to establish Speciai Development District No. 39, pursuant to Article 12-9(A), Special Development District, Vail Town Code,, to allow for the redevelopment of Crossroads, a mixed use development a request for a text amendment to Section 12-2-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3- 7, Amendment, to add a definition for bowling alley; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, to add bowling alleys as a conditional use; and requests for conditional use permits to allow for the construction of an outdoor operation of the accessory uses as set forth in. Section 12-7E-5 (ice skating rink); a major arcade to include indoor entertainment; a theater, meeting rooms, and convention facilities; multiple-family dwellings and lodges; and a private club to allow for the establishment of a for sale parking club, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Vail Town Code, located at 141 and 143 Meadow DrivelLot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Crossroads C=ast One, LLC, represented by Ivlauriello Planning Group Planner;: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to December 13, 2004 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 7. A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6G-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area and dwelling unit, located at 4690 Vail Racquet Clubs DrivelVail Racquet Club Condos, and setting forth detail in regard thereto. Applicant: Racquet Clod Owners Association, represented by TRD Architects Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: Tabled to December 13, 2004 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: l3. Approval of November 8, 2Q04 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 9. Information Update MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: • • 1fl. Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: ~• The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information,. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, far information. Published, November 5, 2004, in the Vail Daily. • ~~ a~a~?c ® ~~m ~ ~~F O`~~ ~ p-~y~,l~m ~ '~~~r _Gm `aoa O~ yam U Q ® 4L ~U mU ~'s'ou U~~ ~ W '~_. F- ~ ° ,n e~ a is ° ~ m m~ cm 3ca m,=~a m' >= c ~~ rce~~'$ ~i42~~~=4 m >cu°, ~ ~~3 g7~ 7UH~sai ~~• aF a~a a ~r°--?cdN m 1fL 3-c ~ ~s;q o~ ti ~ m ° mca~U ~ m¢ m --~ mU v+ `me m,~ m 40. ~ w ~~ 25mr m ct] ~ ~°~~m~' ~° °rima ^J ~mcau m >mm ~m m ([ O ~mm 0 a :a m a N } C ~ m 'O L O ?. d7 ~ J® 3 ~-a a ~ A VmLC _Jp ~ EUmCJ ~ -m gym~aC C~a m~Otn ~~C O m ~fil Ql '. ~ c~ O m ca n o=a Um3 ° wo' co ycN ao,m Q p r o mna~ m oc3m® o~m a U~~~ ~ - y. GcxU r~ ~n otye a <cUa io3 rn~~~Oy m asmc m}ma~E¢ ~m,< ~ m '(,72 w T9~ FQ ~`U z as v= o mU m~ ~~ mrq a ~, ~' cmo.a nm c Lm c `-n mm m s° c cm'ce z °~c u°? °oo`o'g~wUm T~am~o oc~ >o z, o;= a w L7~mC .4 >`„~~'~,~m ac' ~@oaa'i~ a ~Na.c{a Q~,rUoc ou"-m map, c -°3`a'r.7~®CC mU~m1m UI~a ~4LL~ ~L T ~ _ CC H~~ ¢ a- o c q1 m_: m o vs_ o mm c m mm t m I(E~I }E C WT@~ m ~. E _~ O cCC ~C @d (G >(.!IA P-C C t0 C otlm_C1~W ~O~m C:l Ya WEq~~oa `~ ao~~~~o~ ~~v:. ymo N.a °' Q Q'°~.c ~p try `~ U7~u,o~ ~ 'w ~.o2 c°im mU c~a~~~ ~4 C7 '~ QU"m ~a BTaE>~°e ~'~m a®'~~ a°p m~LOCa~w~~ c~ wo~~ u ~~-o ~''"odNm mail°x= oc7= df a`'~ - mc'. C7 U ~y'o [Y a~ - ~ e ~m m -om m~eag pU g€a, ¢~ac Y ~Nm $ ~3ao~+- OQL7 aaam:~ oU a da A coN~a m qmo ~' a o~ a ~ c a '$ g-Sma+`a ood coa ,~~TM °om~ a o a a E- ~ m~ ~(J E m a w v`°i t N .. R G O J a'm L ['J a. C J N~ n m .. ~ ~ wEn~= a ~2oan©ii°'ca~ ~owp~~ m o ~oge.. 'us'C'm= ac~ .. ~ mA~E '~ msw ~o.. ~ C,Som~ ci ° ~.a3~..m ~4~ ®c~,a~~ c ao=mmU cm ray wm® ~a~m~~i-[Zm3c o'2°~irouy.c ~O~mrnom~~~® -- ~S ~ yRCmZS arc dam-amc m"ma m'~a. ~ >,c~o.ycc abmmm Qac mU~T6 co-"aum Oc~~O'm ~ .~~~a _maar Nro m `~3o~3mQam ~=~5?mma~m.~ r maa- m~ co °'o-a zwz~ to cs au:3> cn¢ nct ¢t~s.- yd"~~ ¢cn o.U m Ru,¢ ma d E~ a ' N¢ mma dc3P ~wd ma ¢~n ~caau~La~a d ~ O ~ v; y ~ .~ 'C w O G` f.A O • U ~ z. L ~ C ~ O C, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~^^ ~ ~ Cam' qqq ~ O ~ r ~ ti W ~""' ~, U 3 r ~/~ ~ y I~ ~d C _ ~ _ ~ A 7 i 4-. ,+ p O Q~ ~~ ~ v; N N ~ N ~-, U ~ 1.r G +~ rq a e! .~ 4.1 cC ~ > c~ +~ ~ O ,Z ~ cd ~ ~ "Cd Q ~ ~ 3 rH qbj c~r~~' ~ • U ~ cad ~ ~' Q ~ a ~ Q N ''' ~. cll ~" 'd ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - j "C1 v_~i y cad ~ ~ ~ ~ c3 ~ ~ "C3 ^• tl3 4) ~ aJ ~, G ~ ~ W z3 n. ~ ~ cs ~ •~ es ~ •~ a ~ n ~ O O ~+ ~ ~: W '~ ca ~ L as ca '0 ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ [4 .~ Gr N U ~ /] r.j Y 0 O 7R-, n~.: `~ .~ 4~3 O .~ m O W v ~~ THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE ~~,~~:'~ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Cammission of the Town of Vail on IVa~ember 22, 2004, at 2:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a variance from Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Cade, to allow for revisions to the previously approved development plan for One Willow Bridge Road (previously Swiss Chalet}, located at 100 Willow Bridge RoadlTracts K & L, Block 5E, Vail Village First Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: One Willow Bridge Raad, represented by Resort Design, Inc. Planner: George Ruttier A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text amendments to Section 12-3-3(E}, Appeal of Town Council Decisions; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant; Town of Vail, represented by Matt Mire Planner: George Ruttier A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6G-S, Density Control, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area and dwelling unit, located at 4690 Vail Racquet Club DriveNail Racquet Club Condos, and setting forth detail in regard thereto. Applicant: Racquet Club Owners Association, represented by TRD Architects Planner: Matt Gannett A request for final review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a Type II Employee Housing Unit, located at 4812 Meadow Lane/Lot 8, Block 7, Bighorn Fifth Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant; Bighorn LLC and' the Duane F. Rogers Revocable Trust, represented by Larry Benway Planner; Bill Gibson A request for revision to the final pla#, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area, located at 1094 Riva GIen/Lot 4, Spraddle Creek Estates, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: W&B Development, LLC, represented by Tim Losa, Zehren and Associates, Inc. Planner: Matt Gannett A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Tawn Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Gode, to allow for a residential addition located at 2339 Chamonix Lane/Lot 11, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting faith details in regard thereto. Applicant: Robert Stephanaff, represented by Jack Snow, RKD Architects Planner: BIII Gibson The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970} 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification, Please call (970} 479-2366, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, far information. Published, November 5, 2004, in the Vail Daily.. MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 22, 2044 SUBJECT: A request for final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a variance from Section 12-7A-~, Height, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the previously approved development plan for One Willow Bridge Road (previously Swiss Chalet), located at 100 Willow Bridge RoadfTracts K & L, Block 5E, Vail Village First Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: One Willow Bridge Road, represented by Resort Design, Inc. Plans ier: George Ruttier ' I. SUMMARY The applicant, One Willow Bridge Raad Condominium Association, represented by Mike Foster of Resort Design, is requesting a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a variance from Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the previously approved development plan for One Willow Bridge Raad (previously Swiss Chalet), located at 100 Willow Bridge Raad/Tracts K & L, Block 5E, Vail Village First Filing. Upon review of the two development review applications,: the Community Development Department is recommending approval of the requests based upon our review of the criteria outlined in Section IV of this memorandum. 11. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant, One Willow Bridge Road Condominium Association, represented by Mike Foster of Resort Design, is requesting a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, flail Town Code, and a variance from Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the previously approved development plan for One Willow Bridge Road (previously Swiss Chalet), located at 10Q Willow Bridge RoadlTracts K & L, Block 5E, Vail Village First Filing. Mare specifically, the applicant is proposing revisians to the interior floor plans and the exterior elevations to address ingress/egress requirements for the building and an increase in building height to resolve grading and drainage issues between One Willow Bridge Raad and the East Meadow Drive streetscape project. As currently approved, the building does not comply with the minimum ingresslegress requirements established by the International Building Code and sits in a "`hole",below the new East Meadow Drive. The key changes to the previously approved development plans and the building height variance request includes: • The addition of exit stairways throughout the building, • The addition of a common stairway and building connection on the west end of the building adjacent to the Talisman Condominiums, • A revision to the exterior fagade of the architectural tower element on the northeast comer of the building, • A reconfiguration of the outdoor pool area, • A redesign of the exterior residential unit decks on the southeast corner of the building, • An increase in overall building height of approximately two feet (48' to 50') Pursuant to the procedures outlined in Chapter 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, the applicant is requesting a variance from Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in overall bui{ding height from 48' maximum to 50' maximum. According to the applicant, the building height variance request is largely necessitated as a result of the approved East Meadow Drive streetscape construction project currently underway. As designed, in order to maintain proper drainage, flow, pedestrian access, vehicular circulation, etc., the elevation of East Meadow Drive is approximately two to three feet higher than the street level or first floor of One Willow Bridge Road. As a result the northeast corner of the One Willow Bridge Road building is left in a "hole" beneath the street. The applicant's request will allow for the entire building to be raised up two feet out of the ground and better match the as-built street elevation. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the approved landscape area, GRFA, site coverage, or other similar development standards. All conditions currently applicable to this project, dated May 12, 2004, shall remain in effect. BACKGROUND On April 14, 2003, the applicant appeared before the Town of Vail Planning and Environmenta9 Commission for a final review of five development review applications. Each of ,the five applications were submitted to facilitate the redevelopment of the Swiss Chalet and to allow for the construction of an addition to the Sonnenalp Hotel. Upon review of the development review applications the Commission unanimously approved the applicant's request with nine conditions. On August 19, 2004, the Town of Vaii Community Development department issued a demolition permit to allow for the removal of the Swiss Chalet and as the initial phase of construction fior the new One Willow Bridge Road Condominiums. Since the issuance of the permit the applicant has been diligently pursuing the completion of the demolition work and the issuance of a building permit for the next phase in the i construction process. r IV. REVIEW CRITERIA AND FIN©INGS Maior Exterior Alteration Section 12-7A-12, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code outlines the review process for major exterior alteration applications proposed within the Public Accommodation (PA) zone district. Pursuant to Section 12-7A-12, "The construcfion of a new building or the alteration of an existing building shall be reviewed by the design review board in accordance with chapter 11 of this tifle. However, any project which adds additional dwelling units, accommodation unifs; fractions! fee club units, any prajecf which adds more than acre thousand (1,QQ0) square feet of commercial floor area or common space, or anv ,croiect which has substantial off site imaacfs (as determined by the administrator} shall be reviewed by the alannina and environmental commission as a major exterior alteration in accordance with this chat,fer and section 72-3-6 of this Title. Complete applications for major exterior alterations shall be su,~rnitfed il; accordance with adrrri,~ristr~ativG schedules developed by fhe department of communify development for planning and environmental commission and design review beard review." Pursuant to Section 12-7A-13, Compliance Burden, Vail Town Code, "!t shall be the burden of fhe applicant to prove by a preponderance of The evidence before the planning and environmental commission and the design review board that the proposed exterior alteration or new development is in compliance with fhe purposes of the public accommodation zone district; that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Vail village master plan, fhe Vail village urban design guide plan and the Vail streetscape master plan, and that the proposal does not afherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of fhe neighborhood, and fhaf the proposal substantiaNy complies with other applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan." According to Section 12-7A-13, Vail Town Code, a major exterior alteration shall be reviewed for compliance with the following criteria: '1~ That tfre proposed major exterior alteration is in compliance with the purposes of tfie Public Accammodativn zone district; Staff Response: According to Section. 12-7A-1, Purpose, Vail Town Code, the purposes of the Public Accommodation SPA) zone district is, "to provide sites for lodges and residential accammodafians for visitors, together with such public and semipublic facilities and limited professional offices, medical facilifies, private recreation, commerciallretail and related visitor oriented uses as may appropriately be located within the same district and compatible with adjacenf land uses. The public accommodation district is intended to ensure adequate lighf, air, open space, and other amenities commensurate with 1r~dge uses, and to maintain the desirable resort qualifies of the district by estabfishing appropriate sife developrnenf standards. Additional nanresldential uses are permitted as conditional uses which enhance the nature of Vail as a vacation community, and where permitted uses are intended to function compatibly with the high density lodging character of the district" Staff believes that the proposed major exterior alteration is in compliance with the purposes of the Public Accommodation zone district as the changes to the previously approved plans are revisions to the interior floor plans and the exterior elevations to address ingresslegress requirements for the building and an increase in building height to resolve grading and drainage issues between One Willow Bridge Road and the East Meadow Drive streetscape project. As currently approved, the building does not comply with the minimum ingressfegress requirements established by the International Building Code and sots in a "hale" below the new East Meadow Drive. The proposed changes have no negative impacts on the intended use of the site. 2} That the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail streetscape Master Plan; Staff Response: On April ~~, 20g3, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing to discuss the implementation policies of the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vai9 streetscape Master Plan and to review the proposed project's compliance with goals and objectives stated in the Plans, Following dISCUSSIOn of the goals and objectives of the Master Plans, the Commission generally believed that the proposed major exterior alteration was consistent with the applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail streetscape Master Plan. Staff believes that the proposed major exterior alteration for One Willow Bridge Road is consistent with the applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail streetscape Master Plan. 3} That the proposal does n~-t otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood; and,. Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed One Willow Bridge Raad project in an attempt to identify any significant negative effects that may be created on the character of the neighborhood as a result of the construction of the project. With the exception of a minor increase of shading on East Meadow Drive due to the increase in building height, Staff believes that the proposed major 4 exterior alteration will not result in any significant negative effects on the character of the neighborhood. 4) That the proposal substantially complies with ether applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Ilan. Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the Vail Comprehensive Plan to determine which elements of the Plan apply to the review of the One Willow Bridge Road project. Upon review of the Plan, staff has determined that the following elements of the Plan apply; • Transportation Master Plan (adapted 1998) • Comprehensive Open Lands Plan {adopted 1994) • L.ionshead Redevelopment Master Plan {adopted 1998) • Art in Public Places Strategic Plan (adopted 2iJCl1) Overall, staff believes that the applicant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the proposed major exterior alteration is in compliance with the purposes of the Public Accommodation zone district, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Streetscape Master Plan, that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Building Height Variance Chapter 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, outlines the review procedures for a requests for variances from the prescribed development standards. According to Section 12-17-6 Criteria and Findings, Before acting on a variance application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the fallowing factors with respect to the requested variance: 1. The relatiionship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Staff Response: The applicant is requesting a variance from the maximum building height requirement of 48 feet_ According to the applicant, two additional feet of allowable building height will allow the building to be raised up out of the ground. As a result, the northeast corner of the building will na longer be dawn in a `°hole'° and the relationship of the first floor or street level of the building to the street level of East Meadows Drive will be significantly improved. Overall, staff believes that the improved streefscape design 5 outweighs any negative impacts that the additional two feet of building height may have on the shading of East Meadaw Drive. ~~ Pursuant to Section 12-17-1, Purpose, Vail Town Code, "Reasons Far Seeking Variance: In order fo prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations i may be granted. A practical difficulty ar unnecessary physical hardship may result from the site, shape, or dimensions of a site or j the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or ; physical conditions on the site or !n the immediafe vicinity; or from other physical limitations, streef lacations or condifions in the 'I immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to fhe applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shale not be a reason for granting a variance. " Staff believes that the street locatian {elevation) and conditions in the immediate vicinity of ape Willow Bridge Road constitutes an unnecessary physical hardship and practical difficult which warrants the granting of a building height variance. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulatian is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. Staff Response: The applicant is requesting two additional feet of building height to resolve the practical difficulties and physical hardship created by the street location (elevation} of East Meadow Drive relative to the first Haar ar street level of One Willow Bridge Road. While raising the building mare than two feet will further irnprave the resulting conditions, two feet is the minimum amount of additional height that is required to get the building out of the "hole". According to the revised plans submitted by the applicant, the 24 inches of additional height will be distributed as follows: • First Floor - 9 inches • Second Floor - 7 inches • Third Floor - 4 inches • Fourth Flaar - 4 inches Staff believes that the applicant is requesting the minimum amount ofi relief from the strict and literal interpretation of the building height regulation '~ necessary to achieve apd attain the objectives of the Zoning Regulations. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff Response: The requested variance will have a positive effec# on transportation and traffic facilities and public safety. As a result of raising the first floor or street level of One Willow Bridge Road two additional feet grading and drainage issues between One Willow Bridge Road and the East Meadow Drive streetscape project are resolved and public safety is improved through the elimination of exterior stairs and grade changes. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission - _ ""' shall make the +aliowing finriings before granting ~, variae~ca: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted far one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone, c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. V. STAFF RECC}MMENQATI4lV The Community Cbevelopment Department recommends that the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission approves the request for a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Cade, and a variance from Section 12-7A~7, Height, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the previously approved development plan for One Willow Bridge Road (previously Swiss Chalet), located at 1Q4 Willow Bridge Road/Tracts K & L, Block 5E, Vail Village First Filing, and setting forth details in 7 i regard thereto. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section lV of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented at the public hearing. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the applicant's requests, staff recommends that the following findings are made as part of the approving motion: Maior Exterior Alteration: "Pursuant to Section 12-7H-8, Compliance Burden, Vail Town Code, fhe applicant has proven by a preponderance of fhe evidence ,before the Planning and Environmental Commission That fhe prgposed major exterior alteration is in compliance with the purposes of the Public Accommodation zone disfrict, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of fhe Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Sfreetscape Master Pfan, fhaf the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect on fhe character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with ether applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan." Building Height Variance "That the granting of fhe variance wi11 not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Public Accommodafion zone disfrict, That the granfing of the variance wil! not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in fhe vicinify of One Willow Bridge Road., and that there are exceptional ar extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance (street location) that do not apply generally to other properties in the Public Accommodation zone disfrict. " MEMORANDUM TO_ Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Department of Community Development DATE: November 22, 2004 SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed text amendment to Section 12-3-3{E}, Appeal of Tawn Council Decisions, Vail Town Code, to clarify the jurisdiction of the Town of Vail Municipal Court with respect to civil actions which may be brought against the Tawn under Rule 106{a}{4} of the Coiorado Rules of Civil Procedure, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Matt Mire Planner: George Ruttier I. SUMMARY The applicant, Town of Vail, represented by Matt Mire, is proposing a text amendment to Section 12-3-3{E}, Appeal of Town Council Decisions, Vail Town Code, to clarify the jurisdiction of the Town of Vail Municipal Court with respect to civil actions which may be brought against the Town under Rule 106{a}{4} of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. The purpose of the amendment is to ensure that civil actions brought against the Town are properly reviewed in accordance with Colorado law as recently affirmed by the Colorado Supreme Court . Based upon staff's review of the criteria in Section II1 of this memorandum, the Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council of the requested text amendment, subject to the findings noted in Section III of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION QF THE REQUEST The applicant, Tawn of Vail, represented by Matt Mire, is proposing a text amendment to Section 12-0-3{E}, Appeal of Town Council Decisions, Vail Tawn Code, to clarify the jurisdiction of the Town of Vail Municipal Cour# with respect to civil actions which may be brought against the Town under Rule 106{a}{4} of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the Colorado Supreme Court recently ruled (Town of Frisco u. Baum, 90P3d845, Colo.2004} that municipal courts in home rule municipalities may have jurisdiction over civil actions brought against the municipality under Rule 106{a}{4} of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure through the adoption of charter language granting themselves `"exclusive ar~d original" jurisdiction. In this case, the Supreme Court's decision upheld the ruling of the District Court that it lacked jurisdiction over a C.R_C.P. Rule 106{a){4) appeal of a zoning decision and that such cases are the jurisdiction of the municipal court.. The Town of Vail is a home rule municipal and has adapted "exclusive and original" jurisdiction language into our Charter. Staff believes that the municipal court is NOT the proper venue for Rule 106(a}{4} appeals and as such proposes this text amendment to the Zoning Regulations to limit the jurisdiction of the Town of Vail Municipal Court to handling criminal matters instead of matters relating to Rule 1 ~6(a}(4} appeals of zoning actions. Staff believes such matters are more appropriately bandied in District Court. The proposed text amendments are as follows: (deletions are shown in sic ±hr~~+g#ladditions are shown bold) Appeal Of Town Council Decisions; The final decision of the Tawn Council with respect to any appeal pursuant to this Chapter or any development application submitted pursuant to this Title may be appealed to an appropriate court pursuant to Rule 1fl6(a)(4) of the Cvlarado Rules of Civil Procedure. The Town of Vail Municipal Court shall not have jurisdiction Qver such civil actions. :~pli;, ~d;~rt r"c~®:#1~~r 7tv; ~ggrie~•:~I n c~•~n:cl~..~ff~,~,~ mod-pcr.:rn aggrieved "y-a-iincl deeiGio; ~ cf t`:, f^,.,~ /•AY OM/.IF ,~•ith ram^^^+ '~ ~ f~~~^' ~^~r~.l rray JC ~G'`\-fe~ri'GV4~V' cal; dIGii Irf~ca~-vcrr"~rQf., +t`~~`r'~~fiS~lOt~G"~ i!! t,~:--"~'1\rr~ pied ~a~~ t~'-~ la~da~s-o* thz :fc~ CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria and factors for consideration far a request of a text amendment are established in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12-3, Vail Town Code (©rdinance Na. 4, Series 2002). A. Consideration of Factors Reoardina the Text Amendment: 9. The extent to which the text amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the Zoning Regulations; and, The proposed text amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the Zoning Regulations. According to Section 12-1-2, Purpose, Vail Town Code, the general and specific purposes of the Zoning Regulations are; `A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town, and to promote fhe coordinated and harmonious development of fhe Town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. 8. Specific: These regulations are intended to achieve the fallowing more specific purposes; 7~ To provide far adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. 2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other dangerous conditions. 3. Ta promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and fo lessen congestion in the streets. ~ 4. To promote adequate and approprr'ately located off-street parking and , loading facilities. 5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic values. ~ 6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consisfent with Municipal development objectives. 2 7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures, 8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the Town. 9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable nafural features. 14. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters. 7. To otherwise provide far the growth of an orderly and viable community. " Upon review of the stated purposes of the Zoning Regulations, staff believes that this text amendment is compatible with the general purpose of the Zoning Regulations and the specific purposes. 2. The extent to which the text amendment would better implement and better achieve the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town; and, Staff believes that this text amendment ensures that appellants and directly affected parties are afforded a fair and equitable review of an appeal action. 3. The extent to which the text amendment demonstrates how conditions have substantially changed since the .adoption of the subject regulation i and how the existing regulation is no longer appropriate or is inapp[icabie; and, Staff believes that this text amendment ensures that appellants and directly affected parties are afforded a fair and equitable review of an appeal action. 4. The extent to which the text amendment provides a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land use regulations consistent with municipal development objectives; and, Staff believes that this text amendment ensures that appellants and directly affected parties are afforded a fair and equitable review of an appeal action. 5. Such other factors. and criteria the Commission andlor Gounci! deems applicable to the proposed text amendment. B. The Planning and Fnvironmental C:rammission shall make the following findings before forwarding a recommendation~of abr~rova1 for of a text amendment: That the amendment is consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vaii Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town; and ~. That the amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the Zoning Regulations; and 3. That the amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Tawn and prarnotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the Tawn in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its 3 established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. !V. STAFF RFG©MM~NDATlON The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning & E=nvironmental Commission forwards a recommendafion of appro~a) of the proposed text amendment to the Vail Town Council. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria found in Secfion VI of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, subject to the following findings: 1. That the amendments are consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and are compatible with the development objectives of the Town, and 2. That the amendments further the general and specific purposes of the Zoning Regulations; and 3. That the amendments promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town, but do promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that do conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. r 4 MEMORANDUM T©: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 22, 2004 SUBJECT: A request for final review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a Type 11 Employee Housing Unit, located at 4812 Meadow Lane/Lot 8, Block 7, Bighorn Fifth Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Bighorn LLC and the Duane F. Rogers Revocable Trust, represented by Larry Benway Planner: Bill Gibson SUMMARY The applicant, Bighorn LLC and the Duane F. Rogers Revocable Trust, is requesting a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-6D-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for the proposed residences located at 4812 Meadow Lane. The conditional use permit is requested to allow the applicant to construct a Type II Employee Housing Unit (EHU) within a proposed new single-family residence. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends approval of this. request subject to the findings and conditions noted in Section IX of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTIDN t]F REQUEST The proposed EHU will be 451 square feet in size and will include one bedroom, kitchenlliving room, bathroom, and closet. The EHU will have a separate entrance and two surface parking spaces. The provisions of Section 12-6D-3, Vail Town Code, identify a Type 11 EHU as a conditional use in the Two-Family PrimaryfSecondary District. The provisions ofi Section 12-16-2 Conditional Use Permit, Vail Town Code, determine the review criteria and procedure for a conditional use permit. Architectural plans have been attached for reference (Attachment B). III. BACKGROUND In September and December of 1992, the Town Council passed Ordinances 9 and 27, Series of 1992, to create Chapter 13 (Employee Housing) which provides for the addition of Employee Housing Units (EHUs) as permitted or conditional '. uses within certain zone districts. In April of 2000, the Town Council passed Ordinance 6, Series of 2000, to repeal and reenact this chapter and provide additional incentives far the creation of employee housing in Vail. The Design Review Board has conceptually reviewed the design review application associated with this proposal, and is tentatively scheduled far a final review this proposal at their December 1, 2084 meeting. IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the Planning and Environmental Commission for acceptability of use and then by the Design Review Board for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning, However, the Design Review Board approved the two detached residences with a condition for the Conditional Use permit. Planning acid Environmental Commission: Action: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval/eieniallapprova[tyith conditions of Conditional Use Permits. The Planni~~g and Environmental Commission is responsible for evaluating a proposal fpr: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. 2. Effiect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flaw and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. ~ 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use, 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an ~ environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title. Conformance with development standards of zone district Lat area Setbacks Building Height Density GRFA Site coverage Landscape area Parking and loading Mitigation of development impacts 2 Design Review Board: Action: The Design Review Conditional Use Permit, but Board application. Board 'has does not hawe rewiew authority on a must rewiew any accompanying Design Review The Design Review Board is responsible for evaluating the Design Review Board proposal for: Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings Fitting buildings into landscape Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography RemovallPreservation of trees and native vegetation Adequate provision for snow storage on-site Acceptability of building materials and colors Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms Provision of landscape and drainage Prevision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances Location and design of satellite dishes Provision of outdoor lighting The design of parks Town Council: Actions of Design Review Board or Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council ar by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the Planning and Environmental Commission or Design Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. Staff': The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines.. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff believes that the following previsions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to the review of this proposal: • Chapter 12-2: Definitions 12-2-2: Definitions Employee Housing Unit (EHU): A dwelling unit which shall not be leased or rented for any period Less than thr'rty (3t7) consecutive days, and shall be rented only to tenanfs who are fulf-time employees of Eagle County_ EHUs shall be allowed in certain zone districts as sef forth in this Title {Section ?~-13). Levelopment standards for EHUs shall be as provided in Chapter 93, "Employee Housing" of this Title. For the purposes of this definition, a "full-time" employee steal! mean a person who works a minimum of an average of thirty (3(7) hours per week. There steal! be five (5) categories of EHUs: Type I, Type 1!, Type 111, Type 1V, and Type U. Provisions relating to each type of EHU are set forth in Chapter 93, "Employee Housing" of this Title. Chapter 12-6F: `f'wo-Family PrimarylSecondary Residential District 2-6D-1: Purpose The two-family primary/secondary residential district is intended to provide sites for single-family residential uses ortwo-family residential uses in which one unit is a larger primary residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment together with such public facilities as may appropriately be located in the same district. The two-family primary/secondary residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single-family and two-family occupancy, and to rnainfain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by establishing appropriafe site development standards. 92-6D-3: Conditional Uses The following conditional uses sha11 be permitted, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title: Bed and breakfast as further regulated by section 12-~4-18 of this title. Funiculars, and other similar conveyances. Home child daycare facility as further regulated by section 12-94-12 of this title. Public buildings, grounds and facilities- Public or private schools. Public park and recreation facilities. Public ufiJity and public service uses. Ski lifts and tows. Type II employee housing unit as set forth in chapter 73 of this title. Chapter 12-13: Employee Housing ~2-13-7: Purpose The Town's economy is largely tourist based and the health of this economy is premised on exemplary service for Vail`s guests. Vail's ability to provide such service is dependent upon a strong, nigh quality and consistenfly available work force. To achieve such a work force, the I ~~ I I 4 community must work to provide quaNfy living and working conditions. Availability and affordability of housing plays a critical role in creating qualify living and working conditions for the community's work force. The Town recognizes a permanent, year-round population plays an important role in sustaining a healthy, viable community. Further, the Town recognizes its role in conjunction with the private sector in ensuring housing is available. The Town Council may pursue additional incentives administratively to encourage the development of employee housing units. These incentives may include, but are not limited to, cash vouchers, fee waivers, tax abatement and in kind services to owners and creators of employee housing unifs. The T©wn of Vail or the Town's designee may maintain a registry and create lists of all deed restricted housing units created in the Town to assist employers and those seeking housing. 72-~3-3: General Requirements G. Development Standards No property containing an EHU shall exceed the maximum GRFA permitted in Title 72 except as specifically provided in herein. 2. All trash facilities shall be enclosed. 3. All surface parking shall be screened by landscaping or berms as per Chapter 12-17, Design Review. 4. Each EHU shall have its own entrance. There shall be no inferior access from any EHU to any dwelling unit it may be attached to. 5. An EHU maybe located in, or attached to, an existing garage (existing on or before April 18, 2C?Dt? and whether located in a required setback or not), provided that no existing parking required by the Town Municipal Code is reduced or eliminated. A Type I EHU which has bOt7 sq. ft. or less of GRFA maybe considered for physical separatit~n from the primary unit, if it is constructed in conjunction with a two car garage and is otherwise compatible with the surrounding properties, does not have an adverse impact on vegetation, and does not dominate the street The Design Review Board shall review such requests for separation. 6. All EHUs must contain a kitchen or kitchenette and a bathroom. 7. ©ccupancy of an employee housing unit shall be limited to the maximum of two persons per bedroom. r • ~ 2-13-4: EHU Requirements by Type. EHU Zoning districts Ownership/ Additional permitted by right Transference GRFA' or by conditi~onaf use Type I I Additional Garage CredlU parking 5rte Storage Coverage ,Requirement /Reduced Landscape Area nJa Allowed 30o sq. Per chapter ft. of additional 7©vf this title, garage area for the EHU. All units not constructed with a garage shall be rec#uired a minimum 75 sq. ft. of storage area in addition to normal closet space. This 75 sq. ff. shall be a crediifar storage only. Chapter 12-16: Conditional Use {in part) fvtlnrrrlurn/ i7enslty llltaximum GRFA of an EHU 30o sq. #!. Allowed minimum. as third 1,200 sq. ft unit an maximum. property. Does not count as densi[y. 12-~6-1: Purpose; Limitations: In order fo provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this fitfe, specified uses are permitted in certain districts subjecf fa the granting of a conditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so That fhey may be located properly with respect fo the purposes of this fide and with respect to their effects an surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended fa assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town of large. Uses listed as eondifiona! uses in fhe various disfricts may be permitted subjecf to such conditions and Nmifafians as fhe Town may prescribe to insure that fhe location and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with fhe development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental fo other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permits shall be denied. Zoning; Two-Family PrimarylSecondary Residential Land Use Plan Designation: Lew Density Residential Current Land Use: Unde~ebped Lak Area: 27,582 sq.ft (0.6332 acres) t; Conditional Use: Single-family residential Two-family residential Primary!- sevondary residential zone distriots meeting minimum got size requirements Agriculture and open space VI. SITE ANALYSIS The a=HU shall oat tre sold or transferred separately from the unit it is associated with. The EHU is entitled to an additional 554 sq. ft. GRFA credit. Development Standard Setbacks (min): Front: Sides: Rear: Building Heigh (max)t: Density {max): GRFA (max): Single-family EHU Site Coverage (max}; Landscape Area: Parking; Single-family EHU 3 spaces 2 spaces Proposed X20' 15' 315' ~ 33' 1 units + 1 Type II EHU 3,576 sq.ft. 45i sq.ft. 3,138 sq.ft. {11%) 23,503 sq.ft {85°f°) 3 spaces{enclosed) 2 spaces(unenclosed) EHU Storage Area: 75 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft.* "'{the applicant has agreed to provide the required 75 sq.ft. of additional storage; however, reprinted plans were not available at the time this memo was printed) VII. SURROUNdING LAN^ USES AND ZONING Land Use Zoning Narth: Residential Two-Family PrimarylSecondary South: Residential Two-Family PrimarylSecondary East; Residential Two-Family PrimarylSecondary West: White River National Forest nla (Eagle County jurisdiction) VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria far a request of this nature are established by the Town Code. The proposed Type II EHU is located within the Twa-Family PrirnarylSecondary Residential District. Therefore, this proposal is subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Cade. A. Consideration of Factors Reaardna Conditional Use Permits: 1. Relatiionship ar~d impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town.. • Allowed/Required 20' 15' 15' max. 33`!30' 2 units + 1 Type II EHU 8,136 sq.ft. 550 sq.ft. 5,516 sq.ft. {20°/a) 16,549 sq.ft. (60%) 7 When the Town Council adopted the Town of Vail Affordable Housing Study on November 20, 1994, it recognized a need to increase the supply of localsJernployee housing units. The Town encourages EHUs as a means of providing quality living conditions and expanding the supply of employee housing far both year-round and seasonal local residents. The proposed unit will have a positive impact on the Town's rental housing needs, ~. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreatiion facilities, and other public facilities needs. Staff believes that there will be proposed Type II EHU on light, air, schools or parks. an insignificant impact from the population, transportation, utilities, 3, Effect upon traffic with particular releren~.e to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. Two additional vehicles are anticipated in association with this EHU, and the applicant is proposing to accommodate this anticipated parking demand. Staff believes that this proposal will have an insignificant impact to the above-referenced criteria. ~. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. The EHU will be located within a proposed new single-family residence. Staff believes that the Design Review process will ensure that the proposed EHU will not significantly impact the scale and bulk of this project in relation to surrounding uses, and that the proposed EHU will be consistent with the development standards applicable to this property. 5. The proposed EHU meets the Town's requirements for zoning, awnershipltransference, GRFA, garage creditlstorage, and density. a. Zoninct districts permitted by right or by conditional use A Type II EHU is a conditional use in the Single-Family Residential, Two Family Residential, PrimarylSecondary Residential, and Agriculture & Open Space zone districts. The subject property is zoned Two-Family PrimarylSecondary Residential.. b. OwnershiglTransference A Type II EHU shall not be sold or transferred separately from the unit it is associated with. The applicant is not proposing to sell or transfer the EHU separately from the primary dwelling unit. c, Additional GRFA The EHU is entitled to a 55g sq. ft. GRFA deduction. The applicant is proposing to utilize 451 sq. ft. of that deduction. d. Garage Credit/Starage Requirement A 3©0 sq.ft. garage area GRFA deduction is allowed for the EHU. If the applicant chooses not to construct a garage for the EHU,.. then a 75 sq. ft, s#arage area is required. The applicant is not proposing to construct a garage for the EHU, but instead has agreed to provide the additional 75 sq. ft. storage area. Revised plans showing the additional storage area were not available at the time this memorandum was printed; however, the revised plans will be presented at the PEC's project orientation meeting and public hearing. e. Parking The parking requirements for EHUs are subject to the regulations of Chapter 12-10, Vail Town Cade. This EHU is proposed fo be 451 sq. ft. in size, therefore two parking space are required. The applicant is proposing to provide two unenclosed surface parking spaces. f. Minimum/Maximum GRFA of an EHU Type II EHIJs are allowed with a minimum of 3Q0 sq. ft. of Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA} and a maximum of 1,2QQ sq.ft. of GRFA. The proposed EHU will be 451 sq. ft. in size (plus an additional 75 sq. ft. storage area). ~. Density The applicant is proposing to construct asingle-family dwelling unit and one Type II EHU on this site. Pursuant to Section 12-i3-4, Vail Town Code, a Type II EHU will not count as density and is allowed as a third dwelling unit an a property in the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential district. B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following. findings before granting a conditional use permit. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the Low Density Multi-Family (l..©MF} district. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properkies or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning regulations. 9 IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATI(]N The Community Development Department recommends approval of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Cade, to allow far a Type IE Employee Housing Unit, located at 4812 Meadow LanelLot 8, Block 7, Bighorn Fifth Addition. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, subject to the fallowing findings: That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be operated ar maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially irtjuriuus to prolaeriies or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will +comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning regulations. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the following conditions: 1. This conditional use permit approval shall be contingent upon the i applicant receiving Town of Vail approval of the related design review application.. 2. Prior to final design review approval, the applicant shall revise the plans to illustrate a minimum of 7~ sq.ft. of additional storage. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall execute a Type II EHU deed restriction with the Town of Vail Department of Community Development to permanently restrict the use of the EHU for employee hauling. X. ATTACHMENTS A. Viciniky Map B. Architectural Plans C. Public Hearing Notice 10 - Q r T 4 F G Attaci~men#: B - i(eS-9L> pL6 8 c`i9: l:9 pl X131 _ ^~ ~ I I ul~~ rex -928 (at6§ xYJ ~ any ~ ~ `~I 8EI~9 ^] 'y3YMtln 71lrfa 34LHL1'NV] Gb®lL SSif -9iE (014) '~ " -M1'`I rcv~a oa 'S~y.w03 YC.t aag '9'i Stf3~f)a AH7 aHr 1.U.i1 Sa3n~:'.0 e o ~I S "~® essay 'o] i v~ s~ Hnai ~ ~~ ~ bid - 1~311H~~1y H7ilIQa=' H__f! NiiIS1.1!0_ iS L;aa'~nra 'L rsa~a 'p i[n em« "<! ~ I ~~~m 111 .~rr~~~~ ~~Gv~ 3~N3aIS~b Sa3J021 ~ ~~L `' HI' ° u ~~ I Is~1Q -_ a~ i ~~ ~~ ~ ~ t~ w ono H ~ U Z-O--~ ~ ~ Z ~•^UQ ~ ~ QQuJ~~ J ~ ~ z ® ~ C~ ~ C7 z ~ ~ Qz~g~ (~ OC] F- Q r- w z t7 S t~ ~ ~ '~ ~- W `~ c'7 mW ~_UO J r LY> QQD~U~O ~zZZ ~ --~ _I ~ O C~a ~~ZLLOLL OF-aFrF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~z~~~ v~~~gg~W~~ww~w[7a W GQ ~ ~ w aY ~~U.=cn s; w~WJ°-~u~.L~Wa~~~r-aW W zz'~~'` ~ ~WWWw~~o~Orn~u3~~~ J ~ ~ z ~ U ~ Q~~oo z f?~~~~U¢Ix.O4 QWO~X UL {V ~UUrNr~ r UUl!-p3L!]~tL ~CCWU1~~mW ~ m ~ ~ ~~{ ~ H-oYr-rn W r1 ~~~ ~l Q O S~ J J W O ~ N M r N 6*7 V A N C7 V r r V ~ U._<LW W 2~ o ~~zvcvnric^ic~irivari i I r -- - - - a svU:-vzs (^ta) xv~ - iFS-9Cb 06 B 6585 I'8 DZl ~13A 8CI98 'DJ "}J3r?1yd '3n,lb0 3a~wflNl,!V3 Dt+DII r N ~[ 4 ~~ ~L 54z+-5Z61U[fi1 iC9t9 oa saarMa3 Pr>z xue U~d SL"3Jr)a 1,W4' QNL' JJ. Ci~C '~j~;3hIM1^ ' ;_~ am~ ~ ~ '~ i " ~ C FiN5D8 ^7 lic„ ~~ MMl)1 t~pS118=tl hll. ili N!-?SlnlpflR~ NZ"71'-tJ*.9 'C N70"18 '8 !01 Yx°rna =~~~`a °PV M ~ ~ a , H '~ _~ .. ~-~ in xv,ti+,N~~ ~~i~H~ 3~N~Q1S32! SlJ3J021 frt s:a8;~ _ ~ ~ ~' ~'''E- f u~ ¢ `~ ~ ~~~ i ~~ , i ~ J ~_ 6~ ~~~f~, ~~ ll ~YYY iY~ '` e\y Y"~L}}} ;'~9 / \ . ea'°, o~' i~ i i `~/ '•- t~' b i4 ~ ~ Y ~ '~ ~l ~ k~ i x a~ - i ~% !~ . $~ a ~~ d r ~~ Axs~fl 9~8- t ~A ._~~ S A e ~ N ~ pr _~~ ~~BO '88 ~S a."p ~~o a' pY~i ~° Q~ ~~ ~' ~~ A `~ p r a` ~ ~~ ~ i~ ~ -u w ~ ~ ~~ = o~ ar ~ w ~ 3 _ ~ G] J D~ F7 Q ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~ t. 0 Q W Y 0 . ntu-o~~-,3 4 [?J~p a~wm~- Sid ~ ~'/ YD`S ~~jf ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ , ~~ ~f' L ~ ~.~r~'~~ / ~ ~~'f v n A S y ~ ~y E7E7yt~ s - 9 ~ y ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ f ~ j F ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ S 6r ~ ~~ ~` ` * 1 ~~ • ~~ ~_ p n q_ 7 ~ g 1 \ -'~ ~~ ~~ ~ i 99 g a ~ Y ~ ~ _ ` 1 ` ~. , , \ ~i 1 ~~! J ~ r ~ ~' ` J, \ 1 ~' 6 ~ i 1 - f J \~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ r , ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ` ~ , S ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~~ ~~ / ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ /, ~ ~ ~ / eL ~ ~ N ~ 5:~ ~a , \ , f iia _~ I~g Is~ a fW5--9'~6 'OCC) <v~ SSft-926 ((]C p) ~~ LSpEp '6] °SONYMPf3 8[sl aUd 'G'd t"Ik' - 1'~~1~H~ciV ni hyrnN~a h~dv~ 16vS-?[4 616 B 6905-i58 62G °J31 8f 198 OJ 'r]MaNd '3r'~Itl© 36tlN6NNVJ 6h6[I _- M ~ ~ ~~m ~' ~ z+l' 1 ~~ :~ I~~oa >,HV GNV zlo~s sa~Nno s ~ ' 4 q ., w _ £1599® 'O7 '1I. /ti iCl Nnpl ,u_ a z ~- r N011166tl H1315 NC11 S]I~II1flf1$ hi230H~1£ "1 H:]OJB "0 101 _ F QH ~ r ~ 3~N3~IS3N S2i3J0~1 `s~~=~;~ ~ ~'~" F i° `~ . '/ e`: ~ ~~-, y~~P~ r 5~v--~ -`i=-~~ ~ ~Pp //mar' ~ ~ ~ °~ . ~35'"" 4.Pµ ~e~/ r~ ~~Pfi S. ^~ _~ ~~ 1t s 9 'p T (r~ s e' i~ ~ 'i'°` $ R d ~r~~ ~ i8 i r F ~~ _ - 3 ~g~ 4~ \ a / ~ 15.4 n t1 ~ ~ 'k~.~~\ ~ V ~ F m k' ~g$ ~ ~ ~ - s_mnt. ,~ 22 ` ~ ee¢e` V II / ~ ~~ ~'y 1 fJ~(/ ~//s ~ } ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ p ¢@¢@C pp yy~gp a Y tl ~ li tl U a ~ ~, ., tr ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. %1;, •. ~~ a~ -, x~ u . a ~u cs a W ~ -z ~ r~ a ~u ~ a ~ w z O i7 q ~ W J L7 J d ~d ~ ~> ~ ~'~o ~ Y ~ 2 d' w QU~ au~~.c a~ro~~- ~ ~ ~ f r. ~ ' ~lyhy ~ ppqq\\ \\ 1 1 • my ~1 ~ ~~~ '~ 1 1 °i ~ ,~ add 1 \ \ 1 3#° f 1 1 \ ~ g Z" 1` 1, ,~ ~ ~w ~~r \ , J ] `~ ~ g"1 a5.3Si ~ ~, ~ .~>s ~ 1 ~ ~ \ ~ r ` ,~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ w .~ ` 4 ~ a~ ~, \ ~ ~ ` 1 ~ V R E ` 1, ~ 3 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~~ ,~ ti ~ ~ ~ .' ~ ~ t ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ \ ~' ~ ~ i' ~~ L_~ ~ :~" ~dg J W ~ ~a r ,a ~~ ~ i°~ a f' • • I64~ 9L4 GL6 4 6985-SSB 02( ~l3" *§0¢-9LA (p: A} x~a Bf IOB LJ L'3~Ib'!d ']r.tmii 3U 7NtiN~dVD 06011 ~ - "^ u z ~ ~.. akv F54~-9z6 (u(e) ~~ S?J770a AW:' QN1 11 D0S ~SJ~N1~G ~ d 2S9i@ U".1 :UGV,x UJ YSY2 liOU 'O'd ~" ~ q es9aa o~ "i[vn In Nnol _ ' b'IH - 1:J311H~2iV ND111aQti ti1~I~ NDrslnl~isns ~+LUN9I8 'c k~ma ~ Ins „km ;+ ~ ~ ~- x~~ma > R III A'dMN_-1~ .CZ1~~ll ~~1~E~(]IS32! S2i~J02~ ~~"o~~ u s ~`'~ _ ~L A I ~~~ ~~• ` yr~s~ ~ -~ ~i _ ~ ~u~' /~ S~if ._r /-C P x ` C3~~ ~ y = ~ ~ R ~ ~- V 9r y ~ bi y/ ~ ~' Vie' e t ~~• ~ ~ I I a.'3~ c 4" I~ ~- !_+ ~ ~° 335~1I8 R a p a C-~ / /. ~g~ ~.}n y r ~ e ~ N~o a r ~c "G EIt~E ~ 3 -. F Z ~ P a °"4 v4i ~,,~ ~ ~Z ~` ~ a. Imo'!. ~~ b~ o Q P w ~~ ~ "' 4 a ~gg~ ~ '' ~L "~$'"e~ ~ ~ e~~~ ~: 2qd~ r ~~~ ~~ NAP Iii ."~ ~d"3 ~~ _y~~,~ ~ ~~G~ as € - w' _'W Y ,~ ~. e Y t~ / ' k ~ ~ '~~~J k1 ~ ~ @ ~ tlll ~rcF~ Ot 3inn ~b ~ Z~ '^ owo /.-= ~ ~ `~~ ~. A ~ ~ AT f.~" s~. g~ ~6 r 0 ~' \ y 1 \ 1 C k ~ ~ Il ' -~~~ ~~ ~ i /i' x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~// ~~ yY1~`, V U tl LLI Z w - w J ~ a a~ m~' ~o z E ~ yr a wm~ ~ O 'n 090 0 0 t5u =o k~ _ L m ch 4. _~ ~ ~ p aY l~ G -YY 1~ m~ L o -~ ¢ o f <G~ ~ P ~ wig m F ~ Fla~ .~ FW 4~C'Y OVw Zj 1~Z> 442. r_c~z _dz ~-7a ~`Z a¢o FY ww~ aaa > i. SWZ ~~io U1 Z G J R ,r o - J H CJ d U Qt W ~ F ~ 7 ~ o ~ ~ , Z J ~ V .a[ N W ~ 3 u 0 of a a o ~> J r~zo .~.. 'J)' YGZ U o s C G J - p 4 J P a F ` // / \ / 1 z~ 4. \ \ ~ ~~ - -t ~~' x/ i' ,~F \ \ Flt .. f 'v ,~, , ~ ~'~J 8 ~ \ ~ \ \ ~~' ' C rai - e \ 1 ~ ~L '. ~ tied a+p \ i 6r~!!''~ \ \ ~s \ \ B~ \ >: dP9y \ x ~1;~~ '~i `2% ~ \ \ \ A \ ~ ;:,~ ;~ gs ~~ \ \ \ \ Se~ F \ \ \\ '~ a; ~ \ \ \ 1 ~ h 53 \~ \ ~ ~ U ~ \ \\ ' \ S'~.lE ~ 'L \~WK Z 4 \ \ \ . ~Gµ~[~ \~ ~+~w \ 1 \J ~~a 1 \ CJ ~ ~~ N ,~ G? 1 a W W N W\ r \ w ` \ \ \ \ ~~ m 1 \ x _ OaV 44 - ~C 1 J { V ~ u~ o `.l fL 9 0 tb l~ ~ rp ~ w \~ \ ` \/\/\\ {\ \ ` P i4 ~-' ~ w~g- mO4 - F- q <V u~ Oo o\ " 1 \ \ /. ° a~ ai ac +° \ \ ~ i , \ i l j~1 \ \ \ \ ~ J ~ \ \ f f ~yi / # tltlqq f ~~~ f aj3~ J z \ / ~o \ ~ ~~ 3' E i iii ~3 e / ` _..~;-9ss to-s} xre ssus acs (°el -+'~ ZfStH CJ "_C*J+ .3 EfrZ xO6 Od 'dld i„~3~1i~~~t'~ YII hb",tihN~B A~??~'d~ [6k5-9Lk OL6 9 699's-7S8 4ZL X131 I fiC?GB "pJ 'apNdt'd "3/1I?ll7 3P'JMpNtJ7J ©9(111 i S- SYf3`3[]a ,cu:° 9rJV llp~s ~Sr3^trtp ~ f i v E5908 'pp 'ilk+f; J^ Mripl `. 1 Mpi1S9Ctl HldI3 TJpPSU~I(IERS tJapH7S8 L 71Jp18 'E 1p1 ~ a - ~'` E f ` V a ~a ~ Vsa ~$ ~~N~a~s~~ sa~~aa °°~ a ~~ ~ I ~~sal ~, _ - ? h ~ -. ~- .. m 2 -y'f w ° I ~ R, O`Q ~[v~ II LaI 'fK ~ nz~ r:- ~^ o ~ . ~ m rt aw ~ m ~ f n' u r '- ~ m NQ~i ~ v<N iz ~V v~ ~ ornj VY4 3~ V ~ V ww M y. _ ~ ~_ ~iy N ~ ~ ©p O ~ 7 w ~ .: O ~ ~ d f < .i I rv II .a j az l1 ?.u I w~ ~ ~C w 4 ~ II V al-'¢ w 2L.CU U,y O < Uq ~ li U 1 V } • L ~ 4 C4 ~~~ Vw W U~UUM Q ' 4 C li - m - li I i a°~ i~-------------- -~-- - --1 I w. ,:, ~, ~ 0' aC __T C ~~ I ~ Oi I ~ 1 ~.ytl ~ m ~_, ~_ _.___ _ -I.. iii KI o W I ml. ", - I ; ~ ~ ~ ~ i i W ~ ^ L.T. i i I I' a i ~- u I w .' z ~ ' _ a iq 7 (~-~ ~ I ran °I 4 CD V ~ I 11 _ ~ ~ i _ ~ k iI ____~______ _17 _~_____ E J- -. .,. o D lL w a o _ F'f m „_, l ~~i W f71 i ~ 1 ~~-~f~-i-p.~ Y9'JS-9[6 (016) %Y! £Cy4P V3 'SCWP.03 9. TL 1108 'D'd I'd - 1 X311 H~ ~'d nl ~.r~r~lv~e ~.r'ay~ 76b5-9~tr 016 i 6985-15t3 OZI X33! ~ E3C109 CJ d351~'t'd '3n48C 30bNGNNtl~ OYDII 52137~J Aktl ~ONN 11g3S 'S213N,'10 ES " - n i ~ : V P a - ` ' - ~ `~ . 9uP X73 llrn. !U NnL}1 rvoalaaav r13ar~ ,voas)nto~ns r+a~n~r5 >i~ola 'e ln~ ~~~ e - I _ ' (~ ~~N~~IS~21 Sb3J0~ s~ao - -~ ~" l !~ ui4~ -_ ~ # .4 =~~ ~u p o, ~ m 4 < ~W Q ~ ~t y J Iwo y -~ q s .._.- ._ .__ ._ ~ W ~ a °w~ a i ¢z~ r -~ - _~ ,r ,L ~ 1____~ -r\~_7 i 7r ( f `f ¢t ;:?;te fc a r~~~~~_ n c, ~- ~4?~ _ 3 - ~ -+~ C Jr ~ f J ~I ` I , ~_ ________e,-___ _Y _-_-_____-_~ ,r a ~- ®I~ i 9 !~ r - n ` LJ It~,a -~-,~_T° ~~ l ~ I I S d ~!~ `- ~ ~'I~ ~r_,T '- .Y1 o-s r *1 I I ;7 r504-4LF (6.6) Mr! L69,9 '67 'S~Jt/vx.13 a;sE OB b-d vsv - i~~lss~~a~~ ui ,tvnr,rv~e ,:aa~~ :R J1~2I II K~ 3 ~ I 1 ` E y ',~o. a Iz _ a i Q ~\ ova W~~ _ ~-~ i~ ~~IrE~ _~ .; 00 .m ;~ ~ s , zZ ~~ _~ ~ Qo gW ~~~ ~ -moo ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ {~ nVw " az i 4 ~ w 0 4 j 4 O $ f] ~~~ ` I ~ > O ~ ~_ rr V~ Q Z_ Q ~ ~~ fC ~ ~ 2 a p J D,\..1 uQ ~--i~LU -_ F-Ar __.~.- _.. ->_-..- R~ 7y rp. 1 _~. _ ~ ~ a''~~ f kr-r`!~ t •- ~ 5 ~ __ L ~ _ ~ 3 ~ ~~ ~' 1 " ~a -- ~ ~~.~~ q~__~ ~ ~'`rr = 't' ` ~~ s r ~ ~ ~' -- ! .~~ _, -- ~: ', ~ ;~ ~~ ~ ~ 4 D I~ ilt O r 1,1 I ' r 1 ~ .V~t-2 L1~u CY /~ III{` M _ I ; ~ I i ~ ._ . I L___ j .o-y ,r-F l xh u ;v - sfi r-.c n . -.r f -6k5-4L9 OL6 'Y (96S--Sf1 02C X131 fl£1Q8 "d7 'a371aYd '3/1laE 3Et'Nilt#NV~k !}60TT ~E31Ca AWV filiV llF3'JS ~SajN11U BS9~09 ~N3 'l1VA. ,'i] Nn.kTl -~0-i1GGy t~1~IJ 'ryL~l sl!t1EE(-S Na33W!]Ifi 't M3fll8 '8 lii~ 3~N~41S3b 52~~902i - '.~~ i~ ~, _: , , ~, I I I ~..____-_--I___..l • J I !i j ~ # 1 L ~ , ////// C ~ r____ _ _~.~_~__________~.. _____ _ I l Y Y ~.'~ J I I = Q J ' ~ ~ S u l ~~ m I ~ c ce n n ii ri I I W ~ ~ V W W ~ J ~ L u I ~rN uw Z W 0 Q i I ~ ~F ~~. ~i I l ~ FU . .a -.~ ! ~ ~ ~• rJ N ~__ ___._._ ._ __ ______.__.-__-_ ___ I I In I ~ II V7 ro m I 1 I ~~~L ~ I l~ J II b LJ 1 Jr~~ ~~ ' .}F I ~ I I~ O W I J ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ W ~ .~ r.~Y+ ai.~i ~ - ~ f Y~ ' ~~ ~ 1 .7 , - "r ~ I O ~ I Yry ~-~ ~i ~ ~ l ~ r ,-. _ - ro ' A D \ ~ ~= = ~~..-- ~'~ _- I I W 1.1 a J I z .- - -- --r`r-.- - J ~ ~ Q7 ~ rc ~ va ~ m u II l,j w J -~ W W - _ _~ ?4N f ~e n ~la m~~ R ~ V J~~u i~ , ~ - - ~'~~_ } ~1 } W J J 4 ~ IJ s W I.I rvl z z~> >z~ ~•r~ ~viw 4 f.3 ' 1.1 ~ W .. ~ Q J UUI) .L'3s7 H N T~V] `~ 3 W --- ~ 11 ~ - o cc ~ S R ~~ U U ill J II ¢ Z C J W V1 ~ o w r ~ J F1.J CC ~ In~O ~ ~ ~ ~ C< l p ! ~` ~• I i I I I 1 1 i i iO n ~i ~ '+ N ~~ ra ~ u it ~u ~~ w IJ ~ q Z .- d` O: l7 I i i i 1 ~I VI .Z-. I J ~ Y F I lY 4 V1 I 2 C3 I .~ 4 ! a4nt 5Zd Iai~Y ><ve iGrS-4.b 016 'd 6485-IS'B UdL '131 ' " ' sst+ szd (Pe'.4) X71 B;: iUB a331~vJ 0~ 7r1I~t) J~NNEJNNV7 Ub011 xcssa .~ 'soar>hoa H;aZ YnB orl SrJ7C]?1 AWV RWV lAOJ$ ~$'JJN.nq 65906 'CI.', 'lItlh, i~ Nl1171 Fj `~' - ~~~~II {~Utif Wp]iIOQV I91JIj 'raUiSIn I¢BOIS N21L1H~I6 'C NJCl F3 "B 1171 III J,V,M~l7Q ,~~?~~+~ --- - - ~~M301S~~1 S?!~`JOa _- ... rsus-sza f~i c) ~xvi :6bS-9Lr pc6 9 6985-!Sg p2L ~l3! _. ~~~ ~ _ ~~ 8CI ' ' ' t - ~' sscr-xa fatal ~n ZC9c@ ~~ 'Spda,Md7 b"i+d xp@ 'V d U8 []~ ?137121Hd 7. ,Ii)0 367vC1.NNV~ potlll SrJ3J6b ANa GNa SJ03S ~S7i3Nnp y - n r ! I'I Y r ~ ~, I dlb' - 1~311H~2}'d Np1i}paa a•i~!.i nro!~!n~uans r~au~~ls •c }ao7e 'e Pn~ ~ ~a s~°' ~ - ~`j III J.b'MN3F3 ALI~'d`1 ~a ~a ~aN3ars32! sa~~oa ~ _ al ~ FJ ~;~ ~ I ~ ~ a i ' c ~ ~ ° ~ A F W ~ y °` _ S z ~ u N ~A p j ~~ ~ ({ ~ n ' ~ IX32 ~ y h a.i ~i ~. ~~ ~~ ~ a o i ' Y v_. G^ :°~ E ~ ;sue d =Y 4 vo . - - ` jJ ~~ r C N p P "'~ f 1 i ~ J I + 11 7 ~ I f ~ 5 ~' ~ - ' G' n ~ xa $ i s~ P U 1 -~/C a-,.t ,C/I 1-,9 @/I t-Gy I~N/1 1-Q, I ~ - ~ ~~ W - I l ~ ~ ~ ~ I T II ' ~ I _ r e~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ I ~ _ P I / ` 4 ~~ _ -~ t ~ ~ _ r -~ ~ ~ L ~{ P a ~ E ! _ ~ - - P I '~ I I n~ P ~ I ~ /,1 c:c u ¢ Q n ~ (~ ~1 --" - ' \ \~'\\\\ I - + ~ d ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~`1 I ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ' ilj-'i I '~ VA i ~ a "" ~ ~,~ ~ " E ~ r l ~ ~ -+ ~~ P ~. --t 1 ~ l - ff } ``I a ! F II ~- ! - - ~I li- d~l ,e d ~~-VA _ 1 l11 -{ ... ...~ _ . ~ .-I{ I\r 1 ~ g ~+~ ~gW pz~ W~u ~gw ow ~~~ ~ am 1 `I \L ~ m ~~ ~S•°- ~ ~~~~ ' o ~~~ ~..~~ ~zw ~w~o ~ gN 5 ~~~ ~ c.~~ ~ ¢ a ~ '1 ' ~= o„a 'Fi _ m ~5 ~¢¢ 'F ~ ~ : w a o Ve ' + Cp{ uOO~w o l9N ~~ ~S O ]C `U ~u ~ J W ~ N~~ i ~ u ~ J F ~~ ~- S~ " w ~ ~~~ F ~J. ~ Wx~ w 8 x ® ~i ~r Vii` 5i 3 ~~ ~+~ a Ay • • i I II I i9Di-9C8 (q(8) kv.~ S~~Y~9(.tl (Q36J '3~1 !S 549,./'V7 'SOtlYMV`3 BCYE 1%rO~B`'q'd vCV _.. lJ~l~~l~.l CA rte! iii ~dN,r~~e ~.~z~a~ X66 5La tlLb 9 69HS-15N 02L 4471 ~ _ A£106 P 'b3Niltid '3/~IdO 7[{VN~tJNVJ 04UII r ~ ` 2 ~~ I V S 2i3!lOc4 ANy 4Ntl !1C]7S ~5?JjNf10 es9aa m'~ivn ~o Nnul ~ ~~ - - w~ ~, ` ~~ ~~ - rvoutdad Nldt~f ~r>uJS2nlcens NhIJN^.1~7 't Nao~~ '© 1Q~ w~~ ~ ~ ° " i ~y~ ` p~`j ~~tJ~{]ES32~ S2i3J02i s<an~N ~.~'t ~ `~'=~4~ 1u~4~a~ ~C ~~ Y ~~440 •Q z oa ~-- _~ ~ -~ CJ '~ J = LEI ~ ~ ._ ~_ 7 J Q 4f1 ~n L cr -~ca u e a~i C145q J '~(1dVM.[J itS~L %U FS ('d III .~b'MI'J~8 ,INN`~~1 tG~S-9LC t)i6.~ n9a IS© OIL X131 8Etc6 'o~ 'a3~tavd '~rtdu javrtor.wv~ oeolt Sa306t1 AWV pne 110;15 'S JJNf50 es9ne ~¢~ ~it'n ~~ Nnol Wotl,aav ru~id Nutstr,tertns N2tOH liH '/ Nsma 'e tn~ 3~N~C]pS3~l S~1~JOa !/C b-,L o E1 t~n ii rSa z ~ x~", r da~~ ~~N U ~ ~~ ~~p l 7 j~Y SN Cri <7~ Oa o 3 49 ii op ~~~ iM ~ ay~m o ~~ P >~~m`;~~ :ten ~~ogu~. °~~4 4 L~ a ~ ;= I I .Y r'--ll I II I 11 1 II I II ~~ ~ ~ ~~ t[vc~f ~~ n' H 3 ~ ~a sl I .~ ~ K ~ m i I ~~ I ~¢c ~~ I I e~x j r_K ?3_ I - I c3c y{ry OV~ Q N i~ i ~ W ~ F- :.I V ~ l1 L7 ws-szs facdl xra :,AM 91 ~, (Of G7 '1'~ YS31p 'p^ '~gNYMO'1 pSlL %Ofi '0.1 iii ~,vn~,r~3a ~,a~a~ 15 try-9(4 OcE 9 59G5-1S8 OcL '~31 ii£la6 '0] 2J??lilad "3r,i?la 7aVNf]NN7} 08477 ' ~a ~° .<M®~ ^ ` . S] 39021 ASJtl ahJa 11 L!}S 'S M7NnQ n59ne 'C17 '-tl'an JLI hJY,NA , ' ' ~`M s' m ~ ' - a Ao rrutAluaa FI1~7' Np7s7n7aans raro'+a7a z x'1a is 7 , ~ _ ~ r~ ~JN3Q~53~1 ~~.7 x.104 ~~°3~~ /,ja au uu 'lL - Y ~L - i °~, 4 "' m ~Jw ~rc q~ ~¢ ' ¢u - ~ uG Jyi :.1 s•^ ~ aj ' o YC~ C ~:~ n~° ». • t$ '~~° Z H I Q 7 ~i LJ I m LJ ~a 0 U ~ 'W C] a z '~~, O - /_ 1 I~ h`'t~7/Jy may ~~ 4 ~O~ ~~5 ~y~ dW~ V2~ uK2 „k" 1m ~i • Attachment: C THIS 1TEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE ~ ~ " '1~~~~iV OFVr11i,`' NOTICE iS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail on November 22, 2004, at 2;0© PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for final review csf a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a variance from Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the previously approved development plan for One Willow Bridge Road (previously Swiss Chalet), located at 100 Willow Bridge RaadlTracts K & L, Blook 5E, Vail Village First Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: One Willow Bridge Road, represented by Resort Design, Inc. Planner: George Ruther A request for a recommendation to the Vai! Town Council of proposed text amendments to Section 12-3-3(E), Appeal of Town Council Decisions; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: To~yWn cif Vail, ~rep~~esenteu try Mitt Mire Planner: George Ruther A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6G-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Cade, to allow for additional gross residential floor area and dwelling unit, located at 4690 Vai[ Racquet Club DriveNail Racquet Club Condos, and setting forth detail in regard thereto. Applicant: Racquet Club Owners Association, represented by TRD Architects Planner: Matt Gennett A request for final review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to a11ow far a Type II Employee Housing Unit, located at 4812 Meadow LanelLat 8, Block 7, Bighorn Fifth Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Bighorn LLC and the Duane F, Rogers Revocable Trust, represented by Larry Benway Planner: Bill Gibson A request for revision to the final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area, located at 1094 Riva Glen/Lot 4, Spraddle Creek Estates, and setting faith details in regard thereto. Applicant: W&B Development, LLC, represented by Tim Losa, ~ehren and Associates, Inc. Planner: Matt Gennett A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-BD-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Cade, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow far a residential addition located at 2339 Chamonix Lane/Lot 11, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Robert Stephanoff, represented by Jack Snow, RKD Architects Planner: Bill Gibson The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (97d) 479-2138 far additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2358; Telephone for the Hearing Impaired; for infon~sation. • Published, November 5, 2004, in the Vail Daily. Pareel Detail Page 1 of 3 6e~~Ee C4~~ty ,~s~~ess~r/Tre~~L~rer Parcel Detail Informatiion AsSessor/"I`reasurer Property Search ~ Assessor Subset Query C Assessor Sales Search Bali[ Building Chararteristi[s ~ Tax Information Sales Detail ~ Value Detail ~ Resided€:iai/CosTtmercial iriprow-errsent Detaii ~ Land Detail - -- - SC Area ~ A.ccoxar~t r~lumber ~~ Parcel dumber ~~ PRitll Le--y 'rax .___ Y~3 -- i Rd11325 ~~ 2101131©3004 ~I 46.566 - C7Wner Name anr! Address _ _ - -- ----- - ----- -------- - -- _ -- DUKE, MEG SHIELDS 4450 S CLARKSON 5T - - ~ENGLEVdflOD, GO 80110 Legal Description - - _ ! ~StJB:BIGHO}?N 5TH ADDITION i3LK:6 (LOT:3 BK-0265 PG-0705 WD 12 13=77--- - - -- -- Lcacatian Physics! Address: ~~4$68 E MEADOW DR UNIT: VAIL 5ubclivision: ~~13IGHd]RN 5TH A.DDITIf~N Acres: ~~O.S27 Pr[e fse:°~:y, Tax.. "waiiuatiae~ Znfc~rs€.atian ~~ Actual Value I~ Assessed' Value ~ Lana: ~~ - --_ _ 42s,~ao~~ 33,s3o~ Fmprovements: ~~ Z69,5S0~~ Z1,460~ . Total: ~~ _ 694,550~~ 55,Z90~ ~i .__._ ~I - !~ http:/Iwww.eagfecounty.usfgoodturtislassess~rlparcel.asp`lParcell'~Iumbe~2~0153103DQ4 10111/2004 County Off'icie~ls ~ County Services j Community ~ Vic#eos Advanced Search ! Calendar J Conta[t Parcel Detail ~ag1e Courtt~ asses~oirJTreasacrer Parcel Detain Irtf®rrnatlon Assessor/Treas!.irer f~rvperty Seas-ch ~ ~'1ssf;~ssar 5t;bset L~uery ~ Assessaa~ Sales Search basic RWildis7~ Charatteritics ~ Tax inrnr~ratic~n Sales Del'ail ~ value DetaiE ~ #~~sidential/Co~~r7mes•cial improvement L;etail ~ I_ancs Detail Pale 1 of 3 Tax Area ~~ -_ Account Number ~f Parcel Number ~~ Mill Levy i SC103 I 8033741 II 210113103(30 I~ 46.566 Qwrser Name an[! Address kCHANTLER, CHRISTC3PHER MARTINbALE - ~GILMARTIIV, HERTHER MARIE -7T 4051 SIGHORN RD 11-] NAIL, C(] 51657 Legal Descriptson :ROMAR TQWNHOUSES LOT:1 BK-0261... _ )567 WD 10-06-77 BK-03$8 _ - PG-0964 QCiD 07-06-54 BK-0636 PG-0091 SWD 03-16-94 BiC-0636 __ - _ . ._ -- - --- -- PG-0093 QCD 03-22-94 L©CatEd!] Physical Address: ~~4840 MEADOW LN UNIT: 1 VAIL f Subdrvisionc ~~ROMAR fiC7WNFEOUSES -- ~ - Acres: ~~0 r Prop~:rt~+'Ta~e Wale~a.tl~.t Inficsrrrsati~rr ,4etual Value ~SSSessed Value http:l/vv~~rw.ea~[ecounty. usl~c~adturn~Aassessarlparcel.asp?ParcelNumber=21 Q 1131(73002 1 ~/11/20Q~ county Officials ~ County Services ~ community ~ videos Advanced Search ~ calendar ~ Contact Parcel Detail. Page 1 of 3 County 4fFicials ~ Ccunty Services l Community ~ Videas Ad~~+anced Search ~ Calendar ~ Contact E~~Ee Ce~lJnty AsS~ss®r/Tr~~~~lrar Parcel [?stall Infarmatian Assessor/'Treasurer Propel#y Search ~ ~ssesscr Su.;set C?uery { Assessor Sales Search wr.,siC €~u+Iding Characteristics ~ Tax Infcrr;~a{~ian Sales detail ~ Value De€ai! ~ f~_esidenfiial/Comrrterciai Irnpr~a~remenk Detail ~ Land Detail _ _- -_- - - 1~ Tax Area II P.ccount ii@umber I Parcel l~lurr-trer ~I Mill Levy ~1 SC103 It R033742 ~~ 210113],03DD3 II 46.566 Qwner Dame aid Address 1MASSEY, KELLY l)RPJER - .. _- _ _ 194DD C9LONNAI)E "('RL 1ALPHARETTA, GA 3DD22 I Legal Description 1SUF3:ROMAR TOWNHOUSES LOT:2 R$815Z4 1 Ilgcla o6-13-a4 I~ Location --- -- - I Physical Address: 14840 MEADOW DR UNIT: VAIL Subdivision: IIROMAR TOWNHOUSES __ . -~. I Acres: ~ o J Prtaparty Tax 1laluatiacs lrefcarmatiarP I li Actual value !1 ,4ssessed value ~ I Land: II _ _ - zsS,DOD]1 zD,~DOI - - r ~ Impravements: ~1 529,10011 _ 42,120 1 Tt>tal: ~I 784,10DI1 62,4201 fl II II http:IJwruw.eagl ecvunty. uslgOC~dturns/assessorf parcel .asp?ParcelNumber~210113103 003 10!11 J2Q04 Parcel Detail ~ae~6e ~c~r;~~t~y ~k~s~~~c~r/~'r~~~~r~r Parcel detail Inforrr~ation Assessor/Tredsurer Property Search ( Assessor Subset Query ~ Assessor Sales Searc€~ Basic Building Characteristics ~ Tax Iriormatian Sales flekail ~ Value Detail ~ P,esidentia!/Cor~rmercial Improvement Detail ~ Land Dekdil j Tax Area ~~ -- Account lumber - ~~ Parcel Plumber +I P'iill Levy SC103 ~I --R011331 - ~ ~ 210113104008 ~~ 46.566 Owner looms and Address. ICHERNOW, DAVID S. & ELIZABETH A. -. I11 CARRIAGE LN _- - - - - CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CO 80121 Leal Description ~SUB:BIGHOR3U 5TH ADDITION k3Li<:7 ~LC1T:9 BK-0222 PG-03977. 1ND 011-i1-72 -_- - --- ~SIC-53248 PG-0678 QCD 09-07-76 ~8K-01542 PG-(}521 QCD 08-27-9r3 .. Location Physical Address:4822 MF~DflW LN UNIT: VAIL Subdi~a3slon: E~BIGHC?RN 5TH ADDITION Acres: L 59~ Property Tax Valuation Information ~~ Actual Value I ~ksssed ~lalue Land: ~I 212,5001 16,920 Improvements: ~ 473,510 ~ 37,590) I 1 II II llttp:l/v~ww.eaglecoua~ty.us/goodturns/assessor/parcel asp?ParcelNu~nbe~21(~! 113104008 10/1112Q04 • [~oranky Officials j County Services ~ Csmmunity ~ Videos Advanced Search ~ Calendar ~ Contact P~rcellletail Pale 1 ~f 3 Caunky OfFicia!s ~ County Services I Community ~ videos Advanced Search ~ Calendar ~ Contact ~ae~ie ~~~~~~ ASS>~~~>QC f Tr~~sala~elr ~a rcel 6~etai I Infra rm a:teo ~ Assess~rJTr~as~.arer P€-operty Search ~ Assessor Subset 4~uery ~ Assessor Sales 5ear[h Baa~ic I;uilcliF~r~ Characteristics ~ "I°ax InforR~nation Sa€es I.?2tGil ~ 4~aluP DetaiE ~ I~eSider-rti~rE/Cammerr_ial Ini~rpv~r~~ent Detail f Land D¢tail I Tax Area ~~ Account Number II Parr_el l~urnber 11 Mill Levy I SC103 ~~ 8011375 II 210113104006 I~ 46.566 Qwner Hacne and Address DAVID S. 8OGE8S REVOCA6LE TBWST I 4802 MEADflVW LN --- .._ _.....,_-_-_. __ . -. ~1fAIL, >rO 81557 Legal Description ~SUB:BI(aHORN 5TH ADDITION BLK:7 -- ~LOT:7 8753541 QCD p3-2'S-O1 Locatio n Physical Address: ~~4802 MEAI}OW LN UNIT: VAIL I Su6tiivisicsn: ~~BICHORN 5TH ADDITION I Acres; 10.67 PCCr~}~.'~-'Z~L~~ ~~~1: i~i~af~fGtrQv'~ A.n~~r~~~~~~r~ -. --__.. I Actual Value - ~~ Assessed Value I _ _ Land: II zxz,5oo~- ~~,~2a1 I Improvements:lL - 339,740~~ ` 31,82D1 Total: ~I 612,240k1 48,7401 II - 11 i~ http:/lw~vw.eag~ecounty.uslg©odturns/assessorlparcel.asp?ParcelNumber=Zip1 ].3104OQ6 10/11/2OC-4 MEMORJaNDUM TQ: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community E~evelopment Department PATE: November 22, 2004 SUBJECT: A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow far a residential addition located at 2339 Chamonix LanefL,ot 11, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Robert Stephanaff, represented by RKD Architects Planner; Bill Gibson 1. SUMMARY The applicant, Robert Stephanoff, represented by RKD Architects, is requesting a variance from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 2339 Chamonix Lane. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends denial of this variance request subject to the findings noted in Section [X of this memorandum. II. ©ESCRIF~TION OF REQUEST The applicant is proposing a renovation to an existing single-family residence with cone-car garage, originally constructed in 1979, located at 2339 Chamanix Lane. A vicinity map has been attached for reference {Attachment A}. The existing lot is non-conforming in regard to the Town's minimum lot size standards and the structure is non-conforming in regard to the Town's engineering standards far driveways. This existing house has 760 sq.ft. of gross residential floor area (4,159 sq.ft. allowed), 490 sq.ft. of garage (600 sq.ft. allowed} which create 1,290 sq.ft. of site coverage (1,808 sq.ft. allowed}, and includes atwo-car garage. The proposed renovation includes a new driveway, two-car garage addition, enclosed entryway addition, dininglliving room addition, and an upper level expansion (master bedroom, bedroom 2, bath 2, and office). This proposal will involve lowering the front one-third of the existing building by converting the existing garage into crawispace and an enclosed entry. Anew two-car garage will then be attached to the front of the existing structure. Additions to the upper level of the structure are also proposed. The proposed renovation will create a total of 3,019 sq.ft. of GFRA {4,159 sq.ft. allowed), 540 sq.ft. of garage area (600 sq,tt. allowed), and 2,071 sq.ft. of site coverage (1,$08 sq.ft. allowed}, The applicant's request and proposed architectural plans have been attached for reference (Attachments B and C}. C] The provisions of Section 12-17, Variance, Vail Town Code, determine the review criteria and review procedures for a variance request. III. BAGKGFiOUhID The existing residence located at 2339 Chamonix Lane was originally constructed in 1979 under Eagle County jurisdiction and today is legally non- conforming in regard to the Town's minimum lot size standards and the structure is non-conforming in regard to the Town's engineering standards for driveways. The applicants' proposal was conceptually reviewed by the Design Review Baard at its November 3, 2004, public hearing. In terms of architecture and aesthetics, the Design Review Board was generally supportive of applicant's proposal. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the associated design review application will be tentatively scheduled for final review by the Design Review Baard at its December 1, 2004, public hearing. Staff has researched other site coverage variance requests in order to provide the Planning and Environmental Commission with additional background information. A summary of that research is provided below: Farstl Residence, (October 2004) At the Forstl Residence, the applicant requested and was granted a site coverage variance of 5.97% (341 sq.ft.} on a lot of only 5,706 sq.ft. The existing home had na garage and the proposed site coverage variance facilitated the construction of a new one-story, two-ear garage. Houtsma Residence, (July 2003) At the Houtsma Residence, the applicant requested and was granted a site coverage variance of 1.5% (162 sq.ft.}. The site had excessive slopes and was limited to 15% site coverage per the Town's Hazard Regulations. This variance facilitated the construction of a new one--story, two-car garage. Ricci Residence, 2576 Davos Trail {February, 1995): Af the Ricci Residence, the applicant requested a site coverage variance far 4.7% (526.5 sq. ft. of additional site .coverage). The applicant proposed to use the additional site coverage to create an enlarged two-car garage, as well as add a small amount of additiona! GRFA to the existing residence. DeanlRousch Residence. 2942 Bellflower (July 1993): At the DeanlRousch residence, the applicants requested a 3.56°/® site coverage variance (287 sq.ft.), a setback variance (4 feet into a 20-foot setback), and a wall height variance.. The request for site coverage and wall height variances were approved by the PEC, but the setback variance for GRFA was denied. It should be noted that the staff recommended denial of the variances, but the PEC approved it. The interior dimensions of the garage were 22,5 by 22.5 feet, and the area of the garage calculated far site coverage was 576 square feet. Tavlor Residence. 24Q9 Chamonix Road (Mav 1993): At the Taylor residence, the applicant requested and was granted a site coverage variance for 1,3% {122 square feet) In order to construct a garage and building connection on the property. It should be noted that the allowed site coverage on this lot is 20°/p {not 15%}, and the applicant was also granted a variance to construct the garage in the front setback {the slope on this lot did not exceed 30%). The approved interior dimensions of the two-car garage were 21 feet by 20 feet, for a total interior area of 420 sq.ft_. The garage contributed 462 sq.ft. toward site coverage. Mumma Residence, 1886 West Gore Creek Drive (February 1993}: At the Mumma residence, the applicant requested and was granted a 1 % site coverage variance in order to construct a garage addition on a lot that exceeds 30% slope, The 1 % overage on site coverage amounted to approximately 99 square feet. The interior dimensions of the approved garage measure 20 feet by 20 feet, for a total interior area of 40Q square feet. The garage contributed 442 square feet toward site coverage. IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the Planning and Environmental Commission for acceptability of use and then by the Design Review Board for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approvalldeniallapproval with conditions of a variance. The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for evaluating a proposal for; 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. `. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title. Conformance with development standards of zone district Lat area Setbacks Building Height. Density G RFA Site coverage Landscape area Parking and loading Mitigation of development impacts V. Design Review E~t~ard: Action: The Design Review Board has NC? review authority an a variance, but must review any accompanying Design Review Board appiication. Town Council: Actions of Design Review i3aard or Planning and Envirann~iental Com~~ussion may be appealed to the Town Council or by the Tawn Gauncil. Town Council evaluates whether or not the Planning and Environmental Commission or Design Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, ar overturn the board's decision. Staff: The staff is responsible far ensuring that ail submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memorandum containing background an the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, ar denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff believes that the fallowing provisions of the Vail Town Cade are relevant to the review of this proposal: TITLE 12: ZONING REGtaLATfOI~S Chapter 12-ED: Two-Family PrimaryfSecondary Residential (PIS) District ~, 92-6D-?'; Purpose; The two-family primary/secondary residential district is intended to provide sifes for single-family residential uses or two-family residential uses in which one unif is a larger primary residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment, together wifh such public facilifies as may appropriately be located in the carne district. The two-family primary/secar7dary residential district is intended fo ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single-family and two-family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential quaJr`ties of such sifes by i establishing appropriate site development standards. Ghapter 12_a 7: Variances i 2-17-1: Purpose: i 4 A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: !n order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the ob;~ectives of this title as would result from strict ar lifers! interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site ar the location of existing structures thereon; from fapographr'c or physics! conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cast or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall nc~t be a reason for granting a variance. VI. SITE ANALYSIS Address: 2339 Chamonix Lane Legal Description: Lot 11, Block A, Vail dos Schone 15' Filing Zoning: Two-Family PrimarylSecondary Residential Land Use Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Current Land Use: Residential Lot Area: 9,042 sq. ft. (0.21 acres) Hazards: Medium Severity Rockfall C3evelopment Standard AllowedlRepuired Proposed Setbacks: Front: 20' 25° West Side: 15` 15° East Side; 15' 19' Rear: 15' 18' Density: GRFA: Site Coverage: Landscape Area: Parking: 1 units + 1 Type I EHU 4,159 sq. ft. 1,8fl8 sq, ft. {20%) 5,425 sq. ft. (fl0%) 3 spaces SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING 1 unit 3,277 sq. ft. 2,071 sq. ft. {23%) 6,328 sq. ft. {70%} 3 spaces (2 enclosed} Current Land Use Zoning forth: Residential Two-1=amity PrimarylSecandary Residential South: Residential Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential East: Residential Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential West: Residential Two-Family PrimarylSecandary Residential CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria for a request of #his nature are established by Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Cade. A. Consideration of Factors Regarding the Setback Variances. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. As proposed, the center section of this structure (proposed kitchen area) does "step-down" in comparison to the existing structure. Although the current proposal does utilize aII of the sites available GRFA or building height; this does not prevent a future renovation from maximizing these two development standards. Therefore, Staff believes the granting of a site coverage variance would allow for the construction of building bulk and mass that exceeds what would otherwise be allowed by the zoning regulations. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve cornpat~biiity dnd uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.. This variance request is associated with a remodel of an existing residence originally constructed in 1979. The existing residence is a non-conforming structure in regard to the provisions of the Town's driveway standards. The applicant is proposing a renovation that. wiVl bring this structure into compliance with the Town's driveway standards; however, this proposal exceeds the maximum allowable site coverage for the site. Although the applicant is proposing to remedy an existing non-conforming situation, a new deviation from the Town Code will be created. Although the Planning and Environmental Commission has previously held that construction of a structure prior to the adoption of the current zoning regulations may be a basis for ~ granting a variance from the Town's current zoning regulations, ~ Staff believes that design alternatives are available to the j applicant to construct additions to this structure without exceeding the site coverage standards. Staff believes the only element of this renovation #hat is necessary to address the existing driveway non-conformity is the garage addition. Today there is 518 sq. ft. of unused site coverage available for a renovation of this property. Staff believes 518 sq.ft. is an adequate amount of site coverage to construct a new two-car garage in compliance with the Town's driveway standards (the Town Code requires enclosed parking spaces to be 9'x18', which is 162 sq.ft., thus the minimum size of a two-car garage must be 324 sq.ft.}. Staff does not believe the additional site coverage square footage created by the proposed ' garage stairs, entry stairs, dining room, master bedroom expansion, bedroom 2 expansion, bath 2 expansion, and the office expansion is necessary to remedy the existing driveway non-conformity. i ~i Staff believes the applicant's proposal should be modified to comply with the site coverage requirements by reducing (or eliminating) any of the following proposed additions: garage, garage stairway, enclosed entryway stairs,. master bedroom, bedroom 2, bath 2, office, or dining room. Therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed variance request is the minimum degree of relief necessary from the strict and. literal interpretation and enforcement of the site coverage regulations necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity among sites in the vicinity and within the Two-Family PrimarylSecondary Residential {PIS} District. If the proposal is modified to comply with the Town's site coverage standards, no variances are necessary far this proposed renovation. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff does not believe the proposed site coverage variance wilt have a significant negative impact on this criterion in comparison to existing conditions. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. ~, That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more ofi the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the carne zone. c, The strict interpretation or enforcement of the sp~cifled regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 7 • IX. STAFF Rl;CUMMENDATI©N The Gommunity Development Department recommends denial of the variance request from Section 12-6D-9, Site Cowerage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition located at 239 Chamonix LanelLot 11, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing 1. Staff s recorrmmendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Gammission choose to deny this request; the Gommunity Development Department recommends the Gammission make the fallowing findings: 1. That the granting of the variance will constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, 2. That the granting of the variance wi11 not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, 3. The strict literal interpretation ar enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 4. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Should the Planning and Environmental Gammission choose to approve this request; the Community Development Department recommends the Commission make the following f:ndings: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the pub@ic health, safety, ar welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difFicu1ty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 4. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges ~enjayed by the owners of other properties in the same district. I Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit request, the Community Developmen# Department recommends the following conditions: This variance request approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vai! approval of the related design review application. X. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Applicant's Statement C. Architectural Plans D. Architectural Plan highlighted to show proposed site coverage E. Public Hearing Notice :7 • 9 P o _ ~ u' ~c ~~ ~ ~~~ o~- A s C,Y W ~G E3 v' ~ c ~ ~ C= ~Q 6a uD ~~? a a cr ~_ ~ ~ 3 c a F N ^Q V Tri II T w LL 0 0 M 0 F- Q ~~ Attachment:. B -:. _ . -.: Qescription of the Variance requested far the Stephanoff laesidence The request is for a variance from the 20% site coverage maximum in the Family PrimarylSecondary zone district. This is a non-conforming lot. The square footage is 9,041.73. The minimum Square footage in the zone district is 15,000 square feet. The current gravel drive is in excess of 10%~,. The mast practical way to resolve the driveway issue is to build a garage in front of the existing structure at an elevation set for an appropriate driveway slope. The resultant garage slab would be 10 feet below the existing lower level. V11e have proposed this garage and a heated entry that will connect the home to the new garage. The new canslruction will resolve the driveway issue and will comply with all other zoning restrictions but, due to the small lot size, wild exceed the 1,808 maximum sctuare footage by 262 square feet. The' existing nonconforming drivelgarage grad the non-conforming site create a significant practica! difficulty. The strict interpretation of the site coverage regulation would permit only 518 additional square feet, which is not sufficient to provide a required two-car garage and an entry. The proposed site coverage of 2,071 is significantly under the 3,000 square feet of site coverage of a conforming minimal lot in this zone district. This variance will have no impact on the other existing ar potential uses and structures in the area. By granting this variance this home can be brought iota greater compliance with the neighborhood particularly in regards to its street frontage. There will be no effect an the light, air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, utilities or public safety. This request complies with the intent of the Tvwn of Vail planning policies and development objectives by upgrading a rundown home and bringing a noncon#orming project into much greater (although not complete) compliance. • RICD Archite~[s, Inc. Design and Consiruction i37 ~vlain Street Suite G4Q4 - P.O. Box 555 - Erlwarcfs, Colorar~o 61632 - (t17t"1; 926-2622 - (~3~C1i 9Z6-362 fax WWW.r~CddfL~l.C()!Tl I ° {--E-----~-- :,.: ~ ~ _ ~~F- ~r _ -~ '.: ;~v37.$u¢1.3aau[B -c~'~`Y A6 4[13dD .aa Hr ~ ~8 yH- ~ 7 i - ~ I? ~, .., ,._ I a: .~sa~'!~unoa 3nv~ 7~,n eo r:,~ol I 'il ~ i- ~ !! V .,xil~} ?~i~~5 SqG ~~Yn 1 V~KAi]P~ 3a Y i I j 'v »c. iq 'x! to tl S ~ ; w I-~ -_._ L~ I j ~ oi~.a- i.:.bo .a:~.. I .,_ ~ NV"~d ONIOVHJ __ ~. SS '.~ ; ~~: • 3 hg~k ~~ urY}_ ! g ~ j fl6~~~~Ea~s~~s~g 9 ~I r, r .~\ t n r 3 ~ ,I '~ ~ \ ~~ ~~ ~ Y'~a s .~ ~` ~~ ~`~! ~ / \ _~ ~ fi 1! 1 ?1 Yy ~ ~ ~; ~ ; ~ l ~ ~, - O :7 .QVr i - e~A ' = z ~ ~ y :~ . ~ a _, , ,~ ~ r_ .1~, t s ,, \ Cis ~ ~ ~' _ . _ / ~,, , ~- z ~ ,` ~~ i z ~, O ,~ ~ h t f~ z~ .''~ X42 ~3, • 7L Z C] 2 T ~ ~ ~ r lyf y ~1``~. _. ___. ,1~ ~ki 722.- i`'1; ,'e:. 4~¢' i '+`a t°~.~ ,5r!, Si;;`, P,. 7;., _. ~ o}Llallll~3L'~}b °~ ., ~: i ~ - ' __ ~~ girl ~~~ 1~'..4 ~~ ~'' ~~`~ 1J ~ ~u+~n ~ 'ii;t :~ ~~~ ~ ~ i,-: ~ -N nib I ~y ~ +! i ~YU ~,.ilw I~II1 I~. 'I ~ I ~ i ° le 3 ~ ~ ~,.} ~~,~! i ~ di ~ i ~f __ ?, 0 I 7 ~ ciJ ~_- I z - ', ., -~[ ~ ~ I I1 ~ ~%~~~ ~~ ~ is - ~ ~a I I ~ ~`~~ lu' ~ AI YI - 11~~4~~ `~ I ~ W ~. ~~, ~ '-~ I ice' `~ Q ~ ce c 1 i 41 I .: ~ II- +i 1 f I u h f ~,3 }{ ~ r ~~~ -' II ~ L Il k ~ -. = ~-.- ~4 _ - m i -~ Q' ~ _ ~ ~ e f ~~~ .. 1d3 4;` [-~ • • • i qN ~Nllly S.Nf]i-1:)$ ~tivcA~~~IIVn ~9 NOi^^E «ICIaiil153/2y1 'V N7018'4 s 1C~1 I ~N'tf7 XIN01N`dH0 ~£~~ a~i: ~~N~afS~~f ~~10N~/Hd~1S ~ Rs • ~, ~ , -a ~` ~ 5'J ~ /1 ~Y\\ ~` ~.' ~`~. ~, ~ ` ~~' }~ ~ ~ ~ +~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~v ~ \, .A t~4' ~~1 ~~~ v v c ~s. O~ ~ e ~ j 1` , Y~ 3 ~., -r 'A e, y.R ~ Rti l ..` ; \ ,q ~ m ~\~ j ~ ~~ .I,~` tl1 f w ~\ ' '~ N E ~~ O J ` l ~+ \` \A E `;- '` \4 ~\ ~~ ~• '`. '~\ ~i ~ s II f~ ~. ~1 o, a =?~. •~ 3~a .. Fj'7 ~~ d : n O 'Z ~ - f \\'' q \\ 1 J r 1 }~ 1 ll 1 1 E 7 a ~ ~ora ~Hi~» 3Nnw~s sva ~ivn ~u Nuis'onia ~nsaa 'z+~~o~e '~ ~ ioi ~ nr s err ~~t~ ~~ ` `~~ ~ ,~ tl QCJtJ?~CJ°iC7~ f`llb'/\ ~ al\,r {3;; ~Nb"l Xll"~OW`dH~ S£~~ . ~ ~..e;t~ ~~, ~ a~' ~J1V~C11S~~ ~~C7h1bNd~J~s ~ , .. 6 ~ 'f qi1~ • 7, a i i ~ _ . __ i _ ~.. __ r ,` ~; *~ %~ ~ \r'~ I' i I , I ~ I 9 i / ~ I r ~ ~ ~ i ~~I~,~ ~i r Sri ~~~'~, ; ~_ 5 'r \ , r i_ ~ ~ i f s t i i ,. ~ i ~ i --- i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 _. I ~~ 5 l ~~ A _ .-. __ 1 1 '15 II 4 ~ ~~ _1____ _r____.-----.-1 r I~ I I -~ ~ ~ I _~ it i y ~ / I i i a ~ I u ~ ,r. 1 i I I r___._1_____~., ___ ri - °~~ i ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I _-.-.__ _.._ ~ I~ ~ S ~I a ~~ ~ ~ 41 i I ~ t~ II ~~ ~~ - ~---_~-1 ~ ~----- i i I i ~ ..~ , '~~ _ :~ i , - -~ --- ~ , r _._. `~` _ ~J 1---, ~v__.__-_____.____________ _._ ,-r ~~ _. ~~, 1!.` I`i '', u~ ~ ~ f~~` ~ %'1 ~., fl 8 x 7 _____ l' f~4 4_~ \;` ~ ~'- Z ~~k \.~r ~ ~~ o~ e~ ~ W `~J; J/ I 4 I~ IA ~ ~ Z ~ ~, ` a a s ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ d~~' "~ ` z ~`,~~~4 ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ` ~ -~~ -~ I V tll ~I I1I1 U E } : oti ~N€~~~ ~rJC~rr~s svo vNn yo nnisinou ansaa 'd ~~n~a 'r~ .tu i ' s ' rse;l oc~~~o700 '-~i~rn R l y ~'~'•~ ~@f ~fVb'-I 3{IfVOWVH~ B£SZ ° ' a f I, ~~1~1~C11S~~1 ~~t~htb'Hd~1S i ~ I41 ; ~i! i . ` j t ~cn ~Hn~~e araoti ~s sva ,~wn ~„ s,n~nansa~, .~ r,~oie ~. i Lc~ our S~a3gY av 1" ~ ~ I~1 ;E Oa'dZ{C7~O~ ~11b/~ I E 3.3+ ~/ i~~~ l ' ` ~ON7(~15~~{ ~~ON`dHd~1S r '~~$ a • 7r d F w J F - ~ ~ ~ ' va ' r I@1 ~. i+/ 2 Q F Q W J W ~ ~f N a w `' •.. i~ • a n, - C F • C\:r C ~~ [ f /f i '~ .\t t %/7 1 i , r ~~ € . f= :~' `~ rf ~ ~__~ r? L °GM `.HIV ili-~ 3r G;H;Jti S'VU ll V.1 JO ND1 Si Ai~]BIiS3a 'o' H~.nly'll ~Dl I ~~N~®IS~~ ~.~C~Nb'Hd~_LS ~'E r `1 i ~~ ~' .~ i ~~~;~ { ! i t F r~ 5 I a ~l Z f3 J W J W C ? ~ a "i~ i\a_l / I Q 2 O a W lIl N ~ W ?y'+ • "s- .; c .>n~.-~ ',8 .-. W.,~'.-...,..... ';~". ;^ 'i : i+ ._ i Y ?-: ~w~C.~~ ~ y~~i~1 ~~ .. :~: , ~~. ° i a ~, _,,~ . ...- °.. • _~ .. i I I~_ J .~ 5 1 5 (~ 4 Q. ~k1''^ 4l '_"~= t I I ~ 1 a / 1 1 l_ } ~ ~ ~ } 1 1 7 ~ } I i i r1 4 I 1 1 I ~ I 4,~ _i______. ~ I j ~ 1 ~•-_-i : 1 1~ I h II __ j. _~J ~_ - I Attachrner+t: D V S Z • Attachment: E THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE _ ~ ~ ;~ ~JI~N OF Y.R,iI, ` NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail on November 22, 2004, at 2:00 PM in the Town of Vai! Municipal Building, in consideration af: A request far final. review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a variance from Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vai! Town Code, #o allow for revisions to the previously approved development plan for One Willow Bridge Road (previously Swiss Chalet), located at 100 Willow Bridge RoadlTracts K & L, Block 5E, Vail Village First Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: One Wi[!aw Bridge Road, represented by Resort Design, Inc. Planner: George Ruttier A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text amendments to Section 12-3-3(E), Appeal of Town Counci! Decisions; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicants Town of Vail, represented by Matt Mire Planner: George Ruttier A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6G-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area and dwelling unit, located at 4690 Vail Racquet Club DriveNail Racquet Club Condos, and setting forth detail in regard thereto. Applicant: Racquet Club Owners Association, represented by TRD Architects Planner: Matt Gennett A request for final review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-3, Canditiana! Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a Type II Employee Housing Unit, located at 4812 Meadow Lane/Lot 8, Block 7, Bighorn Fifth Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Bighorn LLC and the Duane F. Rogers Revocable Trust, represented by Larry Benway Planner: Bill Gibson A request far revision to the fnal plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Tawn Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area, located at 1094 Riva Glen/Lo# 4, Spraddle Creek Estates, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: WEB Development, LLC, represented by Tim Losa, Zehren and Associates, Inc. ~'lanner: Matt Gennett A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town ,,,:~''::~ Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Cade, to allow for a residentia! addition :'"" located at 2339 Chamonix Lane/Lot 11, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto, Applicant: Robert Stephanoff, represented by Jack Snow, RKD Architects Planner: Bill Gibson The applications and information about the proposals are available far public inspection during regular office hours at the Tawn of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Depar#ment. Please call (970} 4~'9-2138 for additiona! information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published, November 5, 2004, in the Vail Daily. Y I Property O}vners adjacent to the subject nronerty: 2339 Chamonix Lane, Vail 1. Wedel Enterprises Physical Address: 237$ Garmisch Drive, Vail F.O. Box 38$ Legal ,Description; Townhouse Sitc 3 Edwards, CO 81632 Sub: Vail Das Schone Filing 2 'I BLK: G LOT: 10 2. David G. Hilb Physical Address: 2358 Garmisch Drive, Vail ' 1592 Matterhorn Cirele Legal Description: Sub; Vail Das Schone Filing 2 Vail, CO 816.57 BLK: G LOT: 11 ~ 3. Abby S. Sch~vart:~ Physical Address: 2349 ChF~z~aonix Rcl,, Vail GfiB Flagstaff Dr. Legal Description: Sub: Vail Das Schone Filing 1 Cincinnati, OH 4521.5 BLK: A LOT: 12 4. Bert Y.S. & Glenda L. Wang Physics[ Address: 232 Chamonix Rd., Vail 40 Bertha Cir. Legal Description: Sub: Vail Das Schone Filing 1 Colorado Springs, C4 80906 BLK: A LOT: 10 5. Town of Vail Physical Address: 2310 Charni~nx Rd., Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. Legal Description: Sub: Vail Das Schone Filing 1 Vail, CO $1+6x7 Parcel B Resub Tract D ~ i 1