HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-0810 PECPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
August 10, 2009
6 j. 1:00pm
TOWN OF YAfI+
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visits:
No site visits
30 minutes
1. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new
special development district, pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special Development (SDD) District, Vail
Town Code, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive, Units 7 through14 (Vail Rowhouses)/Lots 7
through 13, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090022)
Applicant: Christopher Galvin, represented by K.H. Webb Architects
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
60 minutes
2. A request for a work session to discuss prescribed regulations amendments, pursuant to Section
12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090017)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
3. A request for a work session to discuss a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3,
Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of public buildings and grounds
(fire station), located at 2399 North Frontage Road/Parcel A, Resub of Tract D, Vail Das Schone
Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090019)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to August 24, 2009
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
4. A request for a work session to discuss the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan,
an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC090014)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to August 24, 2009
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
5. A request for a work session to discuss the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan,
an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC090014)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to August 24, 2009
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Page 1
5 minutes
6. A request for final review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12-71-5, Conditional
Uses: Generally (On All Levels Of A Building Or Outside Of A Building), Vail Town Code, to allow
for the development of a public or private parking lot (parking structure); a vehicle maintenance,
service, repair, storage, and fueling facility; a ski lift and tow (gondola), within "Ever Vail" (West
Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West, and the South
Frontage Road West rig ht-of-way/U n platted (a complete legal description is available for
inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC080063)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to October 26, 2009
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
7. A request for a final review of major exterior alterations, pursuant to Section 12-71-7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the area known
as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), with multiple mixed-use structures including but not limited to,
multiple-family dwelling units, fractional fee units, accommodation units, employee housing units,
office, and commercial/retail uses, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage
Road West, and the South Frontage Road West rig ht-of-way/U n platted (a complete legal
description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department),
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080064)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to October 26, 2009
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
8. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulation
amendments, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to amend Section 12-
10-19, Core Areas Identified, Vail Town Code, to amend the core area parking maps to include
"Ever Vail" (West Lionshead) within the "Commercial Core" designation, and setting forth details
in regard thereto. (PEC080065)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to October 26, 2009
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
9. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary
amendment, pursuant to 12-3-7, Amendments, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of
properties from Arterial Business District and unzoned South Frontage Road West right-of-way
which is not zoned to Lionshead Mixed Use-2, properties known as "Ever Vail" (West
Lionshead), located at 953 and 1031 South Frontage Road West and South Frontage Road
West right-of-way, (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail
Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080061)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to October 26, 2009
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
10. Approval of July 27, 2009 minutes
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Page 2
11. Information Update
12. Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published August 7, 2009, in the Vail Daily.
Page 3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: August 10, 2009
SUBJECT: A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment
of a new special development district, pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special
Development (SDD) District, Vail Town Code, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive,
Units 7 through14 (Vail Row Houses)/Lots 7 through 13, Block 5, Vail Village Filing
1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090022)
Applicant: Christopher Galvin, represented by K.H. Webb
Planner: Bill Gibson
1. SUMMARY
The applicant, Christopher Galvin, represented by K.H. Webb Architects and Mauriello
Planning Group, is requesting a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council to establish
Special Development District No. 41, Vail Row Houses, located at 303 Gore Creek
Drive/Lots 7 through 13, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1.
Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VIII of this memorandum and the
evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends
the Commission forwards a recommendation of approval subject to the findings noted in
Section IX of this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
On April 13, 2009, the Planning and Environmental Commission voted 5-0-0 to forward a
recommendation of approval to the Town Council for a similar application to establish the
Vail Row Houses special development district. That application was amended multiple times
during the Town Council review (after the Commission's review). On June 16, 2009, the
Town Council denied the second reading of an ordinance to establish the proposed special
development district. The applicant, Christopher Galvin, represented by K.H. Webb
Architects, has since amended there proposal and submitted a new application requesting a
final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of Special
Development District No. 41, Vail Row Houses.
Initially, the purpose of the proposed special development district was to streamline the
review process for future renovations to the subject sites (i.e. eliminating the need for
multiple variances) while maintaining the row house character of the subject property. The
applicant has since amended their proposal to include the following deviations from the
underlying High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF) District to increase the allowable
development potential of the subject properties:
• Increase the allowable GRFA (gross residential floor area) from a ratio of 0.76 to
1.50 per lot, with Lot 13 capped at a maximum GRFA of 7,256 sq. ft. (ratio of 1.5).
Reduce the required landscape area from 30% to 20% for all lots except 11 and 12.
For Lots 11 and 12, the applicant is proposing no net loss of existing landscape
area (i.e. Lot 11 = 12% and Lot 12 = 7%).
The applicant has amended their proposal to include the following deviations from the
underlying High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF) District to decrease the allowable
development potential of the subject properties as follows:
• Restrict the building eave height limit to 35 feet along Gore Creek Drive (The current
eave height limit is 48 feet for sloping roofs and 45 feet for flat roofs. The applicant
is not proposed to change the maximum ridge height limits of 48 and 45 feet.).
• Reduce the allowable above-grade site coverage from 55% to 50% of the lot area.
Below grade site coverage is not changed from the current maximum site coverage
is 55% both above and below grade.
• Reduce the number of allowable dwelling units to one per lot (two units exist on all
lots except Lot 9) upon redevelopment. This proposed reduction in dwelling units will
reduce the required parking spaces for each lot, except Lot 9, from three spaces to
two spaces.
• Reducing the existing parking encroachments into the Gore Creek Drive right-of-way
by requiring a minimum five-foot (5') separation from the Gore Creek Drive edge of
road. The applicant must obtain Town of Vail approval of a Revocable Right-of-Way
Permit for any new or existing improvements in the street right-of-way.
The applicant has also amended their proposal to include the self-imposed design
guideline:
• All parking areas will be constructed with concrete pavers and snowmelt heat with
future renovations.
• Future snowmelt heat will be supplied by boilers with an efficiency rating of no less
than 95%.
The applicant has amended their proposal to include the following public benefits to off-set
the proposed deviations from the underlying High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF) District:
Dedication of the eastern 10 feet of Lot 13 to the Town of Vail. This approximately
900 sq. ft. of land is to be used as an addition to the adjacent public Roger Staub
Park.
• Increasing the Inclusionary Zoning mitigation rate requirement by 5% (from 10% of
net new floor area to 15%).
• Public art contribution in the amount of $70,000.
III. BACKGROUND
On December 22, 2008, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a work session
to discuss the applicant's initial proposal to create a special development district with the
purpose of streamlining the development review process without substantively altering the
allowed development potential for Lots 7-13 of the Vail Row Houses. The Commission was
generally supportive of the concept and request additional documentation/calculations
demonstrating that the development potential was not being altered.
On March 3, 2009, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a work session to
discuss the applicant's amended proposal. Instead of solely attempting to streamline the
development review process, the applicant amended their application to also increase the
allowable GRFA (gross residential floor area) for all subject lots and to decrease the east
side setback requirements for Lot 13.
The Planning and Environmental Commission held work sessions to discuss this request at
its December 22, 2008, and March 9, 2009, public hearings. On April 13, 2009, the Planning
and Environmental Commission voted 5-0-0 to forward a recommendation of approval to the
Town Council for the proposed special development district.
On May 5, 2009, the Town Council discussed this proposed ordinance and tabled the first
reading for further discussion at its June 2, 2009, public hearing. The applicant
subsequently amended their application to further address the concerns noted by the
Council at its May 5t" hearing.
On June 2, 2009, the Town Council approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 12, Series of
2009, with modifications, by a vote of 5-2-0 (Cleveland and Hitt opposed). The modifications
included requirements that future driveway snowmelt be operated with an energy efficient
shared system; that parking shall be allowed in the street right-of-way subject to a renewable
10-year lease agreement; that the SDD expires and must be renewed every five years,
rather than the standard three year expiration; that the entire proposed $70,000 donation to
AIPP and Roger Staub Park be paid in-full prior to the first renovations in the SDD, rather
than in seven individual payments over time; that if dwelling units are consolidated in the
future, there be no fewer than 7 units in the SDD; and as a condition of approval that any
existing Vail Row House improvements located in the adjacent Town owned Gore Creek
stream tract must be removed. These modifications were integrated into Ordinance No.12,
Series of 2009.
While making the motion for approval of the first reading of this ordinance on June 2nd,
Council Member Daly requested that Staff evaluate the most appropriate method for allowing
the proposed Vail Row Houses parking in the Gore Creek Drive right-of-way. Staff had
concerns with the previous ordinance language proposed by the applicant that could have
made a standard Revocable Right-of-Way Permit irrevocable; therefore, Staff recommended
the Council consider a lease agreement for the parking encroachments.
After the first reading, Staff and the applicant modified the proposed ordinance language to
state that parking "may be" permitted, rather than "shall be", permitted within the right-of-way
"contingent upon" the applicant obtaining a revocable right-of-way permit. This slight
modification in language eliminates the previous conflict between an ordinance creating a
irrevocable parking encroachment ("shall"), while issuing a revocable permit ("may"). This
proposed modification was integrated into Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2009.
After the first reading the applicant researched the concept of using a common snowmelt
boiler system for the various lots in the Vail Row Houses. The applicant believed such a
scenario presents practical difficulties for the ownership group given that some lots already
have existing snowmelt boiler systems, and there is no home owners association at the Vail
Row Houses to manage the use, maintenance, billing, etc. of a common boiler system. In
keeping with the intent of the Town Council's modification to the ordinance, the applicant is
proposing that "any new snowmelt system installed on any of the lots shall utilize a "new
technology" boiler with at least a 95% efficiency rating and be approved as such by the
Community Development Department." The Council integrated this language into Section G
of the ordinance. On June 16, 2009, the Vail Town Council voted 4-3-0 to deny the
applicant's request on second reading.
The applicant subsequently amended their proposal, and on July 13, 2009, the applicant
submitted a new application requesting the establishment of Special Development District
No. 41, Vail Row Houses. The most notable amendments included with drawing the
proposal to allow Lot 13 to expand their unit into the existing 20 foot side setback and the
establishment of a minimum five foot separation between all parking spaces and the Gore
Creek Drive road edge.
IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BOARDS
Order of Review:
Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the PEC for impacts of use/development,
then by the DRB for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning, and final approval
by the Town Council.
Planning and Environmental Commission:
The PEC shall review the proposal for and make a recommendation to the Town Council on
the final approval, approval with modifications, or denial of a special development district,
pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special Development Districts, Vail Town Code.
Town Council:
The Town Council responsible for final approval, approval with modifications, or denial of
a special development district, pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special Development Districts,
Vail Town Code. Actions of PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Town
Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or
denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision.
V. ZONING ANALYSIS
The development standards proposed for SDD No. 41, Vail Row Houses are as follows
Underlying Zoning: High Density Multiple-Family
Land Use Plan Designation: Vail Village Master Plan Study Area
Current Land Use: Residential
Development Standard Allowed/Required Existing Conditions Proposed Allowed/Required
Buildable Area (min): 10,000 sq.ft. 2,265 to 5,750 sq.ft. existing conditions Lots 7-12
Lot 13: 4,835 sq.ft.
Setbacks (min)
Front:
20 ft.
>_20 ft.
no change
Sides (Lots 7-12):
20 ft.
0 ft.
existing conditions
Sides (Lot 13 west)
20 ft.
22 ft.
10 ft.
Rear:
20 ft.
>_20 ft.
no change
Gore Creek
50 ft.
>_50 ft.
no change
Building Height (max):
48 ft. sloped/45 ft. flat
<48 ftK_45 ft.
Eaves max. 35 ft. on Gore Creek Drive
No change to ridge height limits
Density - DU's (max):
0
All but Lot 9: 2 du's
1 du max per lot upon redevelopment
Lot 9: 1 du
Density - GRFA (max): 0.76 of buildable area 0.76 of buildable area 1.5 of buildable area
+ interior conversions + interior conversions no interior conversions
+ 250 additions (x2) + 250 additions (x2) no 250 additions
+ nonconforming GRFA
Site Coverage (max): no change all lots <_55% 55% below grade/50% above grade
Landscape Area (min): 30%
Parking (min): all but Lot 9: 3 spaces
Lot 9: 2 spaces
Parking location: 75% below grade
not in front setback
not in street ROW
7% to 44%
all but Lot 13: 2 spaces
Lot 13: 4 spaces
existing on-grade parking
existing within the setbacl
existing in street ROW
20%/no net loss Lots 11 & 12
all lots 2 spaces
existing conditions
existing conditions
5 off edge of roadway
Inclusionary Zoning 10% mitigation rate none required to date mitigation rate + 5% (15%)
(Employee Housing)
VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Land Use Zoning
North: Gore Creek Outdoor Recreation District
South: Residential and Parking Commercial Core 1 & Parking Districts
East: Public Park Outdoor Recreation District
West: Residential High Density Multiple-Family District
VII. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
TITLE 12, ZONING REGULATIONS, VAIL TOWN CODE
Chapter 12-1, Title, Purpose and Applicability
A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health,
safety, morals, and general welfare of the town, and to promote the coordinated and
harmonious development of the town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its
natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential
community of high quality.
B. Specific: These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific
purposes:
1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities.
2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and
other dangerous conditions.
3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and
to lessen congestion in the streets.
4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off street parking and
loading facilities.
5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic
values.
6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land
uses, consistent with municipal development objectives.
5
7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land
with structures.
8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the town.
9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other
desirable natural features.
10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other
amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters.
11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community.
Article 12-6H: High Density Multiple Family District
12-6H-1: PURPOSE:
The high density multiple-family district is intended to provide sites for multiple-
family dwellings at densities to a maximum of twenty five (25) dwelling units
per acre, together with such public and semipublic facilities and lodges, private
recreation facilities and related visitor oriented uses as may appropriately be located
in the same zone district. The high density multiple-family district is intended to
ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities commensurate with
high density apartment, condominium and lodge uses, and to maintain the
desirable residential and resort qualities of the zone district by establishing
appropriate site development standards. Certain nonresidential uses are permitted
as conditional uses, which relate to the nature of Vail as a winter and summer
recreation and vacation community and, where permitted, are intended to blend
harmoniously with the residential character of the zone district.
Article 12-9A: Special Development (SDD) District
12-9A-1: PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY:
A. Purpose: The purpose of the special development district is to encourage
flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most
appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new
development with the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of
streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space
areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail
comprehensive plan. An approved development plan for a special development
district, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish the
requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the special
development district.
B. Applicability: Special development districts do notapply to and are notavailable in
the following zone districts: hillside residential, single-family residential, two-family
residential and two-family primary/secondary residential.
12-9A-8: DESIGN CRITERIA AND NECESSARY FINDINGS:
A. Criteria: The following design criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in
evaluating the merits of the proposed special development district. It shall be the
burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed
development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that
one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the
public interest has been achieved:
1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate
environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural
design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible,
efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements
as outlined in Chapter 10 of this title.
4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans.
5. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural
and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special
development district is proposed.
6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space
provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and
sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the
community.
7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians
addressing on and off site traffic circulation.
8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in
order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and
function.
9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a
workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of
the special development district.
B. Necessary Findings: Before recommending and/or granting an approval of an
application for a special development district, the planning and environmental
commission and the town council shall make the following findings with respect to
the proposed SDD:
1. That the SDD complies with the standards listed in subsection A of this
section, unless the applicant can demonstrate that one or more of the
standards is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the
public interest has been achieved.
2. That the SDD is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies
outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the
development objectives of the town; and
3. That the SDD is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and
appropriate for the surrounding areas; and
4. That the SDD promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of
the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the
town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and
its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest
quality.
12-9A-9: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density
control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the town
council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the
recommendations of the planning and environmental commission. Before the town
council approves development standards that deviate from the underlying zone
7
district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to the
town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is
to be made based on evaluation of the proposed special development district's
compliance with the design criteria outlined in section 12-9A-8 of this article.
VAIL LAND USE PLAN
Chapter 2: Land Use Goals and Policies
1. General Growth /Development
1.1. Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve
both the visitor and the permanent resident.
1.2. The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural
resources should be protected as the Town grows.
1.3. The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded
whenever possible.
1.4. The original theme of the old Village Core should be carried into new
development in the Village Core through continued implementation of the
Urban Design Guide Plan.
1.5. Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing
developed areas (infill areas).
1.6. Vail recognizes its stream tract as being a desirable land feature as well as
its potential for public use.
2. SkierlTourist Concerns
2.1. The Town of Vail should improve the existing park and open space
lands while continuing to purchase open space.
4. Village Core/ Lionshead
4.1. Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the
existing character of each area is preserved through implementation of
the Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan.
4.2. The ambiance of the Village is important to the identity of Vail and
should be preserved. (Scale, alpine character, small town feeling,
mountains, natural settings, intimate size, cosmopolitan feeling,
environmental quality.)
5. Residential
5.1. Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in
existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high
hazards do not exist.
5.2. Affordable employee housing should be made available through private
efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with
appropriate restrictions.
5.3. Residential growth should keep pace with the market place demands
for a full range of housing types.
5.4. The existing employee housing base should be preserved and
upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be
accommodated at varied sites throughout the community.
VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
CHAPTER V. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTION STEPS
GOAL #1 Encourage high quality, redevelopment while preserving unique
architectural scale of the village in order to sustain its sense of community and
identity.
Objective 1.1: Implement a consistent development review process to
reinforce the character of the Village.
Policy 1.1.1: Development and improvement projects approved in the
Village shall be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and
design considerations as outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan and
Urban Design Guide Plan.
Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of
residential and commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the
Action Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban
Design Guide Plan.
Policy 1.2.2: Development and improvement projects shall be
coordinated to minimize the unintended negative consequences
associated with construction activity in a pedestrianized, commercial
area. For instance, the noise abatement, project completion guarantees,
temporary parking, traffic control, etc.
Obiective 1.3: Enhance new development and redevelopment through
public improvements done by private developers working in cooperation
with the town.
Policy 1.3.1: Public improvements shall be developed with the
participation of the private sector working with the Town.
Objective 1.4: Recognize the "historic" importance of the architecture,
structures, landmarks, plazas and features in preserving the character
of Vail Village.
Policy 1.4.1: The historical importance of structures, landmarks, plazas and
other similar features shall be taken into consideration in the development
review process.
Policy 1.4.2: The Town may grant flexibility in the interpretation and
implementation of its regulations and design guidelines to help protect and
maintain the existing character of Vail Village.
Policy 1.4.3: Identification of "historic" importance shall not be used as the
sole means of preventing or prohibiting development in Vail Village.
GOAL #2 To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-around economic
health and viability for the village and for the community as a whole.
Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of employee housing units in
Vail Village through the efforts of the private sector.
Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part of any
new or redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by
existing zoning.
Policy 2.6.3: The Town of Vail may facilitate in the development of affordable
housing by providing appropriate assistance.
Policy 2.6.4. Employee housing shall be developed in the Village when
required by the Town's adopted Zoning Regulations.
GOAL #3 To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking
experience throughout the village.
Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by
landscaping and other improvements.
Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and
seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
Policy 3.1.2: Public art and other similar landmark features shall be
encouraged at appropriate locations throughout the Town.
Policy 3.1.3.-. Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be
encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from,
public areas.
Obiective 3.2: Minimize the amount of vehicular traffic in the Village to
the greatest extent possible.
Policy3.2.1: Vehicular traffic will be eliminated or reduced to absolutely
minimal necessary levels in the pedestrianized areas of the Village.
Obiective 3.4: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways
and accessible green space areas, including pocket parks and stream
access.
Policy 3.4.1: Physical improvements to property adjacent to stream
tracts shall not further restrict public access.
10
Policy 3.4.2: Private development projects shall be required to incorporate
new sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as designated in the Vail
Village Master Plan and/or Recreation Trails Master Plan.
Policy 3.4.3.-. The "privatization" of the town-owned Gore Creek stream
tract shall be strongly discouraged.
Policy 3.4.4: Encroachment of private improvements on the town-owned
Gore Creek stream tract shall be prohibited.
Policy 3.4.5: The Town shall require the removal of existing improvements
constructed without the Town's consent within the town-owned Gore Creek
stream tract.
GOAL #4 To preserve existing open space areas and expand greenspace
opportunities.
Objective 4.1: Improve existing open space areas and create new plazas
with greenspace and pocket parks. Recognize the different roles of each
type of open space in forming the overall fabric of the Village.
Policy 4.1.1: Active recreation facilities shall be preserved (or relocated to
accessible locations elsewhere in the Village) in any development or
redevelopment of property in Vail Village.
Policy 4.1.2: The development of new public plazas, and improvements to
existing plazas (public art, landmarks, historic features, streetscape features,
seating areas, etc.) shall be strongly encouraged to reinforce their roles as
attractive people places.
Policy 4.1.3: With the exception of ski base-related facilities, existing natural
open space areas at the base of Vail Mountain and throughout Vail Village
and existing greenspaces shall be preserved as open space.
Policy 4.1.4: Open space improvements including the addition of
accessible greenspace as described or graphically shown in the Vail
Village Master Plan and/or Urban Design Guide Plan, will be required in
conjunction with private infill or redevelopment projects.
Objective 4.2: Improve and expand the opportunity for active and
passive recreational activity throughout the Village.
GOAL #4 Action Steps:
2. Evaluate additional opportunities for the purchase of additional
parcels for open space and/or public use.
GOAL #5 Increase and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the
transportation and circulation systems throughout the village.
Objective 5.1: Meet parking demands with public and private parking
facilities.
11
Policy 5.1.1: For new development that is located outside of the Commercial
Core/ Zone District, on-site parking shall be provided (rather than paying
into the parking fund) to meet any additional parking demand as
required by the zoning code.
Policy 5.1.2: The expansion of the Vail Village parking structure shall
maximize the number of additional parking spaces available for public
parking.
Policy 5.1.3: Seek locations for additional structured public and private
parking.
Policy 5.1.4: Continue to promote the lease parking program as a means for
maximizing the utilization of private parking spaces.
Policy 5.1.5: Redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged to
provide underground or visually concealed parking.
Policy 5.1.6: Development and redevelopment projects shall be strongly
encouraged to provide ample temporary parking for construction
workers for the duration of a construction project to minimize impacts
on our guests and visitors resulting from the loss of public parking.
GOAL #6 To ensure the continued improvement of the vital operational elements of
the village.
Obiective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and
new development.
Policy 6.2.2:Minorimprovements (landscaping, decorative paving, open
dining decks, etc.), may be permitted on Town of Vail land or right-of-
way (with review and approval by the Town Council and Planning and
Environmental Commission when applicable) provided that Town
operations such as snow removal, street maintenance and fire
department access and operation are able to be maintained at current
levels. Special design (i.e. heated pavement), maintenance fees, or
other considerations may be required to offset impacts on Town
services.
CHAPTER VI: ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN
12
CHAPTER VII: Vail Village Sub-Areas
East Gore Creek Sub-Area (#6)
A number of the earliest projects developed in Vail are located in the East
Gore Creek Sub-Area. Development in this area is exclusively multi-family
condominium projects with a very limited amount of support commercial.
Surface parking is found at each site, which creates a very dominant
visual impression of the sub-area.
While the level of development in East Gore Creek is generally greater
than that allowed under existing zoning, this area has the potential to
absorb density without compromising the character of the Village.
This development could be accommodated by partial infill of existing
parking areas balanced by greenspace additions orthrough increasing
the height of existing buildings (generally one story over existing
heights). In order to maintain the architectural continuity of projects,
additional density should be considered only in conjunction with the
comprehensive redevelopment of projects.
Clearly, one of the main objectives to consider in the redevelopment of
any property should be to improve existing parking facilities. This
includes satisfying parking demands for existing and additional
development, as well as design considerations relative to redevelopment
proposals. The opportunity to introduce below grade structured parking
will greatly improve pedestrianization and landscape features in this
area. This should be considered a goal of any redevelopment proposal
13
VIII. REVIEW CRITERIA
The following design criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating the merits of
the proposed special development district. It shall be the burden of the applicant to
demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of
the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a
practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved:
1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk,
building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation.
The applicant is proposing to prescribe a maximum ridge height of 35 feet along Gore Creek
Drive to reduce the effect of subject properties' bulk and mass. The applicant is not
proposing to reduce the maximum roof ridge height of the buildings, so a maximum eave
height of 48 feet or 45 feet (which is the current maximum for a flat roof) will not change the
four building stories which can be currently be constructed. The Vail Village Master Plan
recommends maximum building heights of three to four stories for the subject properties.
While the dedication of park land within the Village is generally a positive proposal, it does
will reduce the future Lot 13 side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet.
Staff believes the proposed increases in building scale/bulk of each of the subject properties
are appropriate for the neighborhood.
2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and
workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
The Vail Village Master Plan identifies the subject properties as a potential location for
additional residential development. Therefore, Staff believes the applicant's proposed
increases to the allowable GRFA limits through the Special Development District process is
in conformance with the Vail Village Master Plan.
14
in this sub-area. Development orredevelopment of this sub-area will attract
additional traffic and population into this area and may have significant
impacts upon portions of Sub-Areas 7 and 10.
3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as
outlined in Chapter 10 of this title.
Portions of the existing parking spaces for each subject property encroach into the Gore
Creek Drive right-of-way contrary to the requirements of Chapter 14-3, Residential and
Commercial Access, Driveway, and Parking Standards, Vail Town Code. The proposed
special development district would allow this non-conforming parking situation to continue
subject to the applicant obtaining a Town of Vail Revocable Right-of-Way Permit. By
reducing the density of the subject properties to one dwelling unit per lot, the applicant will
reduce the parking demand for each lot by one-half. The applicant is also proposing a
requirement that the parking spaces for each lot be no closer than five feet from the West
Meadow Drive road edge of asphalt. This will provide the minimum clearances required for
Town of Vail snowplowing operations.
Staff believes below grade or at grade garages and off-site parking options are available to
the subject properties to remedy the non-compliant parking spaces that are located within
the front setbacks and encroach in the Gore Creek Drive street right-of-way.
4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans.
The Vail Village Master Plan identifies the subject properties as a potential location for
additional residential development. Therefore, Staff believes the applicant's proposed
increases to the allowable GRFA limits through the Special Development District process is
in conformance with the Vail Village Master Plan.
Staff believes below grade or at grade garages and off-site parking options are available to
the subject properties to remedy the non-compliant parking spaces that are located within
the front setbacks and encroach in the Gore Creek Drive street right-of-way. The
Commission and the Town Council must weigh the benefit of enclosed parking on the first
floor of these residences against the aesthetic and pedestrian scale benefits of not
converting the first floor living areas of the Row Houses to garages.
5. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or
geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is
proposed.
Portions of the subject properties are located adjacent to the Gore Creek 100-year Flood
Plain; however, no improvements are proposed to be constructed in the flood plain.
6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions
designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
The subject properties are located adjacent to Gore Creek; however, no improvements are
proposed to be constructed within the flood plain or the 50-foot creek setback.
The subject properties are located adjacent to the Roger Staub Park, and the owner of Lot
13 is proposing to dedicate the eastern 10 feet of their lot to the Town of Vail as an addition
to the park. This dedication of approximately 900 sq. ft. of Lot 13 to the Town of Vail for
15
public park use would make this lot more non-conforming in regard to the current 10,000 sq.
ft. minimum lot size requirement of the Town's zoning regulations.
7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians
addressing on and off site traffic circulation.
Portions of the existing parking spaces for each subject property encroach into the Gore
Creek Drive right-of-way contrary to the requirements of Chapter 14-3, Residential and
Commercial Access, Driveway, and Parking Standards, Vail Town Code. The proposed
special development district would allow this non-conforming parking situation to continue
subject to the applicant obtaining a Town of Vail Revocable Right-of-Way Permit. By
reducing the density of the subject properties to one dwelling unit per lot, the applicant will
reduce the parking demand for each lot by one-half. The applicant is also proposing a
requirement that the parking spaces for each lot be no closer than five feet from the West
Meadow Drive road edge of asphalt. This will provide the minimum clearances required for
Town of Vail snowplowing operations.
8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to
optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function.
Currently Lots 9 through 12 are deficient in meeting the minimum landscape area
requirements, and the proposed special development district will perpetuate this situation
into the future by reducing the required landscaping requirement to 12% for Lot 11, 7% for
Lot 12, and 20% for the remaining lots.
9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable,
functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special
development district.
The applicant is not proposing a comprehensive redevelopment of the subject properties.
Instead, future redevelopment could occur on a single unit by unit basis.
10. Public Benefit: The proposed deviations provide benefits to the town must
outweigh the adverse effects of such deviations.
This proposed Special Development District includes the following deviations from the
Town's zoning regulations and development standards:
• Lot size and lot dimensions
• Density - Dwelling Units per acre
• Density - GRFA (gross residential floor area)
• Setbacks
• Landscape Area
• Parking - Numbers
• Parking - Location
The applicant is proposing to mitigate the effects of these deviations with the follow:
• Dedication of approximately 900 from Lot 13 to the Town of Vail's Roger Staub park.
• Reducing the building eave height limit along Gore Creek Drive to 35 feet.
• Reducing the above grade site coverage limits from 55% to 50%.
• Increasing the Inclusionary Zoning employee housing mitigation rate by 5% from
16
10% to 15%.
• Imposing design guidelines requiring future driveway renovations to include concrete
pavers and snowmelt heating. The snowmelt heating shall be provided by boiler
systems with at least 95% efficiency.
• Dedication of $70,000 to the Town of Vail Art in Public Places (AIPP) program.
Since this proposal is not part of a comprehensive redevelopment of the subject properties,
the dedication of land to Roger Staub Park is the only near term benefit proposed by the
applicant. The other proposed benefits will only take effect when the individual lot owners
choose to redevelop their properties.
Staff believes the applicant has demonstrated that the negative effects of the deviations
created by this special development district will be adequately mitigated or outweighed by
the proposed public benefits.
IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based upon review of the criteria outlined in Section VIII of this memorandum and the
evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends
the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval to
the Vail Town Council of this request.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation
of approval of this request; Community Development Department recommends the
Commission pass the following motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of
approval to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new special
development district, pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special Development (SDD) District,
Vail Town Code, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive, Units 7 through 13 (Vail Row
Houses)/Lots 7 through 13, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. "
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation
of denial to the Vail Town Council this request, the Community Development Department
recommends the Commission makes the following findings:
"Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section V/ of Staffs August 10,
2009, memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and
Environmental Commission finds:
"I. That the SDD complies with the standards listed in subsection A of this
section, unless the applicant can demonstrate that one or more of the standards
is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has
been achieved.
2. That the SDD is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies
outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development
objectives of the town; and
17
3. That the SDD is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate
for the surrounding areas; and
4. That the SDD promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the
town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a
manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established
character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. "
X. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Applicant's request dated August 10, 2009
18
Attachment A
19
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: August 10, 2009
SUBJECT: A request for a work session to discuss prescribed regulations amendments, pursuant
to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail
Town Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090017)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Friede
PURPOSE
The applicant, the Town of Vail, is requesting a work session to discuss prescribed regulations
amendments, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Title 12, Zoning
Regulations, Vail Town Code, to allow for housekeeping, clarification and policy shifts within
the Town of Vail, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
The purpose of this work session is to discuss those portions of the proposed Sustainable
Building Initiative (SBI) that will affect Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and Title 14, Development
Standards, Vail Town Code. The purpose of the SBI is to formulate a set of "green" building
standards for the Town of Vail, with Phase 1 of the SBI geared towards low-density residential
applications.
Because this is a work session, no formal action is required at this time. Staff requests that
the Commissioners listen to the presentation, ask any pertinent questions, and provide
feedback on the proposed regulations. Staff also requests that this item be tabled to the
August 24, 2009 meeting.
II. BACKGROUND
On January 6, 2009, Staff held a work session with the Vail Town Council to introduce the
2009 Code Revision Project. Council members provided comment on the project, including
highlighting a need to achieve "green" building standards, and to avoid having lengthy policy
discussions about existing regulations such as Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA). On
January 22, 2009, the Vail Town Council instructed Staff to begin a code analysis and gain
feedback from the PEC and other committees in order to proceed with the 2009 Code
Revision Project. As a part of the 2009 Code Revision Project, Staff is revising Title 12,
Zoning Regulations. The 2009 Code Revision Project has identified the following problem
statement:
The Town's first zoning code was adopted in 1969, and since then, the code has been
amended hundreds of times. Most amendments were made one at a time and as a
reactive response to a present concern. Thirty years of amendments have taken a toll on
the Town's zoning code. As a result, the format of the code is fragmented and
disorganized. The language is inconsistent and lacks clarity. And, some policies,
regulations and procedures are outdated. The purpose of the 2009 Code Revision Project
is to re-establish consistency, clarity and accuracy of the Town's zoning code.
The goals of the 2009 Code Revision Project are as follows, in no order of priority:
1. Integrate green standards and guidelines.
2. Streamline the process and procedures for development review.
3. Ensure consistency among regulations and planning documents.
4. Increase efficiencies and cost savings in the development review process.
5. Eliminate outdated, ineffective and unnecessary provisions within the development
titles.
6. Reaffirm existing policies and adopt new policies to clarify direction.
7. Maintain current with industry practices and standards.
8. Ensure support from the community through public process
Staff is consulting various stakeholders including the PEC, DRB, Town Council, a newly
created citizen task force to advise on this topic, as well as general members of the public. An
analysis is being conducted on Title 12, Zoning Regulations, which will result in a report that
will soon be distributed in volumes for review.
On June 22, 2009, Staff held a work session with the PEC on a number of policy questions,
with all Commissioners' recommendations applied to the proposed regulations. On July 21,
2009, the Vail Town Council instructed Staff to continue the process and to adjust timelines for
this project. The last work session with the PEC was on July 27, 2009, where commissioners
provided recommendations on policies.
Staff has undertaken developing the Sustainable Building Initiative (SBI) as a specific task
identified under Resolution 1, of 2009, adopting the Environmental Sustainability Strategic
Plan. This has been tied into the 2009 Code Revision Project, and will be included in
amendments to Titles 12 and 14. The purpose statement, goals and scope of the SBI are as
follows:
Purpose: The purpose of this initiative is to protect the Town of Vail public and
environmental health, safety and welfare by regulating residential construction with the
intent to conserve energy, water and other natural resources, preserve and protect the
health of our environment through optional and mandatory requirements related to energy
efficiency (e.g. insulation, efficient lighting, outdoor energy use mitigation program,
minimum efficiency on HVAC equipment, etc.) construction waste management, site
disturbance, landscape and irrigation, and reclaimed/recycled/recyclable building
materials.
Goal: To both incorporate sustainable building and design practices into the Town code
and create a user-friendly guide%hecklist for Sustainable Building Initiative (SBI) elements
in order to effectively achieve the Town's adopted goals of reducing community energy
consumption by 20% by 2020, and decreasing landfill contributions by 10% within 5 years
and 25% within 10 years.
Scope: The Town of Vail SBI aims to be "practically green" by including only practical,
measurable, and enforceable actions to increase the Town's environmental stewardship.
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The following topics of discussion are aspects of the proposed Sustainable Building Initiative
that are related to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail
Town Code. Within each topic, Staff identifies the current regulations and policies, issues and
recommendations.
2
1. Building/ Fenestration Orientation
The existing regulations regarding building and fenestration (window) orientation
encourage the use of window orientation for passive solar energy. The regulations are
hidden among a lengthy list of regulations within 14-10-5, Building Materials and Design,
Vail Town Code, and are as follows:
14-10-5: BUILDING MATERIALS AND DESIGN:
J. Fenestration should be suitable for the climate and for the orientation of the
particular building elevation in which the fenestration occurs. The use of both passive
and active solar energy systems is strongly encouraged.
In order to reduce energy use, a goal of the adopted Environmental Strategic Plan,
buildings and specifically windows, can be properly oriented to bring in sun in the winter
and shade from sun in the summer months. This is a very cost effective way to reduce
energy use by reducing the energy load required of HVAC systems.
Staff recommends the regulations be amended to include strengthened language that
requires proper building orientation. However, proper building orientation is not always
possible, and a provision should be included to allow the Design Review Board to make
exceptions to this rule.
2. Site Disturbance
Grading and site disturbance have been identified as issues to address, as recent projects
have used the "cut and fill" approach, resulting in major changes to the existing
topography. The current regulations are not clear and concise, leaving room for
interpretation and undermining the ability for Town Staff to enforce the regulations. Site
disturbance is only limited on lots with steep slopes of thirty percent or greater, and the Vail
Town Council instructed Staff to devise a limitation for all single-family and duplex
structures. The current regulations are as follows:
14-10-3: SITE PLANNING:
A. The location and configuration of structures and accessways shall be responsive to
the existing topography of the site upon which they are to be located. Grading
requirements resulting from development shall be designed to blend into the existing or
natural landscape. Any cuts or fills shall be sculptural in form and contoured to blend
with the existing natural undisturbed terrain within the property boundary.
B. Building siting and access thereto shall be responsive to existing features of terrain
rock outcroppings, drainage patterns, and vegetation.
D. All areas disturbed during construction shall be revegetated. If necessary, the
design review board may designate allowable limits of construction activity and require
physical barriers in order to preserve significant natural features and vegetation upon a
site and adjacent sites during construction
G. Slope of cut and fill banks shall be determined by soil characteristics for the specific
site to avoid erosion, and promote revegetation opportunities, but in any case shall be
limited to a maximum of two to one (2: 1) slope.
L. Building footings and foundations shall be designed in accordance with the minimum
standards of the adopted building code. Footings and foundations shall also be
designed to be responsive to the natural topography of the site, and shall be designed
and constructed in such a manner as to minimize the necessary amount of excavation
and site disturbance.
Engineering innovation and poor soil conditions have led to large holes being cut into
hillsides to make room for a new structure. Without limits to site disturbance, sites are
completely graded with no respect for existing landforms, contrary to the recommendations
of the regulations.
Staff recommends that in order to minimize impacts on the land from development, site
disturbance should be limited to 65% of total site area over any 5-year period within the
Single Family Residential, Two Family Residential, and Two Family Primary Secondary
Districts. An exception to this rule would be the addition of new trees, which should be
exempt from this requirement in order to facilitate new planting without limiting site
disturbance elsewhere.
3. Watercourse Setback
Currently, the regulations require a minimum setback of 50 feet from the centerline of Gore
Creek and 30 feet from all other established tributaries. The regulations are concealed
within Chapter 12-14, Supplemental Regulations, and are as follows:
12-14-17: SETBACK FROM WATERCOURSE: Minimum setback from a creek or
stream shall be not less than thirty feet (30) from the center of the established creek or
stream channel as defined by the town comprehensive plan base maps; provided,
however, that the setback from Gore Creek shall be fifty feet (50). Natural creek or
stream channels may not be rechanneled or changed.
This regulation was enacted by Ordinance No. 19, Series of 1976, in order to "provide for
proper land development and use." As is the case with other established setbacks, there
are certain encroachments permitted into the setback from watercourse. This includes a
ten foot encroachment by at grade patios, as well as five foot encroachment by above
grade decks. There is no limit on disturbance during construction, nor are there clear
limitations on vegetation and other non-structural improvements.
Staff recommends that at grade patios be removed from stream setbacks entirely, because
the impervious nature of most at grade patios leads to increased runoff that adversely
affects water quality. Staff also recommends that limits of disturbance during construction
be limited within the stream setback, also to prevent adverse effects on the watershed.
4. Wetlands
Wetlands are a common land feature within the Town of Vail, but regulations for wetlands
are vague and disturbance on or within wetlands requires federal approval from the Army
Corps of Engineers. Town regulations have no clear requirements for limits of disturbance.
The protection of wetlands is essential because wetlands act as a filter, ensuring clean
water enters the aquifer.
The current regulations for wetlands are as follows:
14-7-2: OTHER REQUIREMENTS:
A. Wetlands: If staff determines that wetland vegetation exists on the site, a report
conducted by a qualified environmental consultant delineating wetland areas must be
4
submitted to the town of Vail and the army corps of engineers in conjunction with a
design review board or planning and environmental commission application. Approval
from the army corps of engineers must be obtained prior to building permit issuance.
14-10-6: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT:
B. The presence of significant site constraints may permit the physical separation of
units and garages on a site. The determination of whether or not a lot has significant
site constraints shall be made by the design review board. "Significant site constraints"
shall be defined as natural features of a lot such as stands of mature trees, natural
drainages, stream courses and other natural water features, rock outcroppings,
wetlands, other natural features, and existing structures that may create practical
difficulties in the site planning and development of a lot. Slope may be considered a
physical site constraint that allows for the separation of a garage from a unit. It shall be
the applicant's responsibility to request a determination from the design review board
as to whether or not a site has significant site constraints before final design work on
the project is presented. This determination shall be made at a conceptual review of
the proposal based on review of the site, a detailed survey of the lot and a preliminary
site plan of the proposed structure(s).
Staff recommends a wetland setback be established to ensure wetlands are protected from
disturbance. Other municipalities have a range of wetland setbacks, anywhere from ten
feet to one hundred feet. The requirement for wetland setback in the Leadership in Energy
and Environmental Design (LEED) program is one hundred feet. Staff is further
researching the wetland setback that best fits the local conditions. The Army Corps of
Engineers approval is still relevant, as it is required by the federal government.
5. Roof Design
Roof design in Vail is guided by design guidelines, not standards, which are vague and
lack clarity. Guidelines are recommendations while standards are black and white
requirements. The regulations are as follows:
14-10-5: BUILDING MATERIALS AND DESIGN:
D. The majority of roof forms within Vail are gable roofs with a pitch of at least four feet
(4) in twelve feet (12). However, other roof forms are allowed. Consideration of
environmental and climatic determinants such as snow shedding, drainage, fire safety
and solar exposure should be integral to the roof design.
E. Rooflines should be designed so as not to deposit snow on parking areas, trash
storage areas, stairways, decks and balconies, or entryways. Secondary roofs, snow
clips, and snow guards should be utilized to protect these areas from roof snow
shedding if necessary.
In an effort to reduce heat tape, which is a major burden on energy use, roofs can be
designed to reduce drainage to walkways, driveways, entries, etc. This is already outlined
in the regulations, but it is very vague and leaves room for interpretation. Staff
recommends that these guidelines be changed to requirements, with exceptions, so that all
residential structures limit drainage, and thus, can limit heat tape. Staff also recommends
clear and concise language that restricts the use of heat tape to the minimum amount
necessary.
6. Roof Materials
Currently, the Vail Town Code requires that asphalt and fiberglass shingles be a minimum
of 300 pounds per roofing square. This was enacted to ensure durability and a heavy
shingle to provide visual relief. Since this regulation was enacted, roofing material
technology has advanced, making many materials lighter than 300 pounds per roofing
square but with the same durability. Many manufacturers do not publish the weight of the
shingle, because each shingle can vary in weight and there is no guarantee of accuracy.
The regulation is as follows:
F. All structures shall have class A roof assemblies or shall have class A roof covering
materials, as defined by the adopted building code. The use of concrete tile, slate,
metal, asphalt shingle, fiberglass shingle, and built up tar and gravel roofing may be
permitted. Metal roofing, when permitted, shall not reflect direct sunlight onto an
adjacent property and shall be surfaced with a low gloss finish or be capable of
weathering to a dull finish. Metal roofing, when permitted, shall be of a heavy gauge
and designed to provide visual relief to the roof surface (including, but not limited to, a
standing seam). Asphalt and fiberglass shingles, when permitted, shall weigh no less
than three hundred (300) pounds per roofing square. The use of wood shake, wood
shingles and rolled roofing shall not be permitted. Two-family and multi-family
dwellings shall be required to have uniform roof covering materials, except when the
design review board determines that the materials are compatible, are integral to the
architectural style of the structure and different materials do not share any ridges or
planes, but may share a valley.
In order to reduce the number of times a structure has to be reroofed, thereby reducing the
amount of resources needed, Staff recommends that roof materials, with the exception of
metal and vegetated roofs, be required to have a 40 year or longer warranty. Typically,
roof materials with a 40, 50 or lifetime warranty meet the required weight and relief, and
additional aesthetic requirements can be added to ensure that materials provide relief.
This also reduces frustration by applicants who are unable to acquire documentation from
manufacturers guaranteeing 300 pounds per roofing square.
7. Landscaping- Plant Selection
Regulations for types of plants allowed in the Town of Vail are guidelines that recommend
native, low-water species. However, the use of native and low water use species are
essential to reducing the amount of water that is wasted to maintain exotic species that
may become invasive. The guidelines are as follows:
14-10-8: LANDSCAPING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL:
A. Various natural vegetation zones exist within the Gore Valley as a result of the form
and aspects of the land itself. The north facing slopes within the valley are typically
heavily wooded with spruce, pine and aspen and generally receive less direct sunlight
than the drier south facing slopes which typically consist of sage, aspen and other
vegetation tolerant of drier conditions. The valley floor which is adjacent to Gore Creek
consists of a wide variety of trees and shrubs adapted to the relatively fertile soil and
natural availability of water.
The goal of any landscape plan should be to preserve and enhance the natural
landscape character of the area in which it is to be located and serve as an aid in fire
prevention and protection. The landscape scale and overall landscape design shall be
6
developed so that new vegetation is integral with the natural landscape and the
inherent form, line, color and texture of the local plant communities. Since the major
objective of the landscaping is to help reduce the scale of new structures and to assist
in the screening of structures, the planting of large sized plant materials is encouraged.
Fire wise plant materials are encouraged due to their ability to resist fire. Trees should
be maintained through limbing and pruning in order to prevent limbs from being too
close to structures and other plant materials. Special care should be taken in selecting
the types of plants to use when designing a landscape plan. Final selection should be
based upon the soils and climate, ease of establishment, suitability for the specific use
desired, ability to deter the spread of fires and the level of maintenance that can be
provided. New planting shall use plants that are indigenous to the Rocky Mountain
alpine and subalpine zones or are capable of being introduced into these zones.
A recommended list of plant materials, some indigenous to the Vail area, is on file with
the department of community development. Also indicated on the list are fire wise
plant materials which are suitable for planting within the Vail area. The minimum sizes
of landscape materials acceptable are as follows:
Required trees:
Deciduous 2 inch caliper
Conifers 6 foot
Required shrubs #5 gallon container
Foundation shrubs shall have a minimum height of 18 inches at time of planting.
Rather than only encourage native and low water plants, Staff recommends that the
recommended plant list be a requirement for allowable plant species. An exception to this
requirement would be annual and perennial flower beds, which would be difficult to
regulate.
8. Landscaping- Irrigation
Landscaping irrigation is required by the Vail Town Code, with the following regulations:
14-10-8: LANDSCAPING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL:
D. All landscaping shall be provided with a method of irrigation suitable to ensure the
continued maintenance of planted materials.
While irrigation is required to ensure maintenance of planted materials, there are a number
of ways to reduce water used for irrigation. Since rainwater collection is not allowed in the
State of Colorado (except for properties with well water permits), there is a need to reduce
potable water usage applied to landscaping. In order to reduce irrigation, Staff
recommends that irrigation be limited to drip irrigation systems with rain sensors that only
irrigate a maximum of fifty percent of the total landscape area. This will limit the amount of
non-native grasses on the site to fifty percent of the landscaping, and will ensure that
Xeriscaping is implemented to save water.
9. Landscaping- Tree Removal
Current regulations on tree removal are vague and confusing. While many applicants
request tree removal of healthy trees to open up a view or reduce crowding, there are
many applications for the removal of dead, dying or diseased trees. With the extensive
removal of trees within the Town of Vail, there needs to be a clear regulation on the
replacement of such trees. The current regulations are as follows:
7
14-10-3: SITE PLANNING:
C. Removal of trees, shrubs, and other native vegetation shall be limited to removal of
those essential for development of the site, those identified as diseased or those
essential for creating defensible space. Mitigation may be required for tree removal.
In order to maintain a canopy of trees within the town, and preserve the character of Vail
as a forested mountain community, Staff recommends that all healthy trees to be removed
shall be replaced foot for foot based on the height of the removed tree. While the number
of trees may differ, the foot for foot requirement will ensure that a combination of
replacement can occur. Staff recommends that dead or dying trees be replaced with the
same number of trees, although this may be difficult to require because of the concern
over lack of space for trees. Staff also recommends a program to allow mitigation of trees
on other properties. This may help bring trees to properties that have room, at the
expense of the owner who removes trees on their own property.
10. Snowmelt and Driveway Size
In an effort to reduce residential energy use, the topic of limiting or creating an offset
program for snowmelt systems have arisen to achieve energy reduction goals. However,
snow melted driveways have become an amenity of mountain living, that in some cases,
are difficult to travel or maintain without such a system. Another issue related to driveways
is the amount of impervious surface that leads to polluted water runoff into the watershed.
In an effort to reduce snowmelt systems without banning them, as well as reduce the
amount of impervious surfaces on a lot, Staff recommends that driveway size in low
density residential districts be limited to ten percent of the total lot size. Districts could
include Single-family residential, two-family residential and two-family primary secondary
districts. In the future, additional districts could be addressed, but for now, this would
make the greatest impact. Existing driveways that are legally nonconforming would not be
allowed to expand, but could be maintained. For sites that require additional space for
access, a staff approvable variance could be implemented to ensure that the rules are fair
for all scenarios. Another requirement related to snowmelt limitations would be that snow
melted patios and decks could not count as hardscape as part of the landscaping
requirements. Today, 20% of landscaping can include hardscape, with no limits to what
constitutes hardscape. Staff recommends removing all snow melted surfaces from the
definition of hardscape.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests that the Commissioners listen to the presentation, ask any pertinent questions,
and provide feedback on the policy questions found in this memo. Because this is a work
session, no formal action is required at this time except a tabling of this item to the August 10,
2009 PEC meeting.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
July 27, 2009
O
1:OOpm
Tr1WN
VAIL
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
Bill Pierce
Sarah Robinson-Paladino
Michael Kurz
Susie Tjossem
Rollie Kjsebo
Scott Lindall
David Viele
Site Visits: There were no site visits
30 minutes
A request for a work session to discuss a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3,
Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of public buildings and grounds
(fire station), located at 2399 North Frontage Road/Parcel A, Resub of Tract D, Vail Das Schone
Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090019)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Tabled to August 10, 2009
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 5-0-0
Don Watkins, Belford Watkins Group Architects, made a presentation updating the Commission
on the most recent site plan concept for the proposed Vail Fire Station that included two
driveway curb cuts.
There was no public comment.
Commissioner Pierce asked if the issues with CDOT have been worked out. Watkins responded
that the applicant has submitted an application to CDOT for two curb cuts and is waiting for their
response.
2. Sustainable Building Initiative Presentation - Introduction 60 minutes
Kristen Bertuglia
Kristen Bertuglia made a presentation per the Staff memorandum and a power point.
Commissioner Kjesbo referenced an article in the Denver Post which spoke to the advantages of
going green. The article focused on what elements gave more benefit verse the cost of
implementing the green aspect. He added that windows tend to be high cost and longer return.
He further spoke to the fact that compact fluorescents do not currently work well for private
residences. Snow melt is his biggest concern. He added that the Town has a great deal of
snow melt.
Commissioner Pierce stated that there is an increasing demand for air conditioning. The need
for air conditioning is often generated by the lighting utilized in a space. Retail has larger
windows and display lighting which can really heat a space. Snow melt is a balance between the
cost of removing and piling the snow. If snow melt is eliminated or restricted will driveway
grades will need to be more limited. Heating of the Villages is a larger public benefit. Larger
Page 1
driveways on homes should be examined. He suggested that new buildings may need to have
different standard than additions and remodels.
Commissioner Lindall suggested that the system for regulating the SBI needs to be scrutinized to
see how it works. He added that many of the vacant lots are vacant for a reason. They are the
tough lots and a system like SBI may make the properties less desirable. We need to be aware
that we have fewer flat lots and more sloped lots.
Commissioner Pierce mentioned com-check the current regulation that builders and designers
are utilizing. He believes increasing the standards for roof and wall insulation is important. Need
to regulate re-roof projects to include insulation as many older projects do not have any
insulation.
Commissioner Viele believes this is a noble endeavor, but feels uncomfortable enacting
regulations requiring compliance. He believes that there needs to be some minimal level of
standards, however, he believes that there needs to be some level of option still available to a
property owner. He suggested that maybe there should be a system where a homeowner can
pay an impact fee to offset something they may desire to have in their home. He suggested that
there should be a public vote on any program of this nature.
Commissioner Kurz liked that staff's approach was to become "practical" green. He suggested
that emerging technologies will pose a problem as they evolve fairly quickly. He further
suggested that staff should be prepared for a variance option will be needed. He concluded by
stating that he attended a Pulte Homes building seminar and you can seal a building too much,
as air does need to move and circulate through the structure.
Commissioner Pierce suggested that a few more areas that need to be addressed are make up
air for laundry rooms, range hoods, these end up wasting energy as more openings are required.
Fire places need to have damper systems that close when they are not operational.
Commissioner Kjesbo spoke to the need to understand geo-thermal to greater degree. His
experience is that geo-thermal is not that dependable and costly to install. He does not believe a
blower fan test is best as it occurs at the completion of a project. What happens if you fail? He
suggested having a greater level of insulation inspection during construction. He further added
that separating trash would be difficult as you would need multiple containers on some of the
small lots.
Commissioner Viele pointed out the difficulties of having multiple dumpsters on site. He believes
the program needs to be judicious.
George Ruther, Director of Community Development, asked if there were any other areas staff
should be examining?
Commissioner Viele stated that Summit County has not been charging for building permits. He
suggested that a carrot should be examined. Maybe reduced permit fees for complying with
elements of the environmental program. There are a great deal of costs that come with some of
the systems. If it is a goal of the Town to institute these programs the Town should be willing to
participate by providing incentives.
Kristen Betuglia asked about plan check fees being an incentive and moving a permit up in line
for review.
Page 2
Commissioner Lindall believes that this is a good direction to be going. He suggested that
maybe an incentive could be additional GRFA if a project is going green and meeting certain
standards.
Several of the Commissioners stated that they believed an off-set program above a certain
threshold may be appropriate.
Several conversations ensued regarding heated driveways, heat tape, building design which
could all reduce energy consumption.
There was no public comment.
60 minutes
3. A request for a work session to discuss prescribed regulations amendments, pursuant to Section
12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090017)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION: Tabled to August 10, 2009
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 5-0-0
Rachel Friede discussed the first policy question, which was whether it would be appropriate to
allow private parking to be used for short-term (hourly/daily) rental during off-peak hours.
Commissioner Kurz suggested that this type of program could be used for larger parking lots,
and not in residential properties. He noted concerns about the impacts on cost and
management.
Commissioner Kjesbo reminded the group that the Vail Mountain School withdrew their last
application due to neighbor concerns. He stressed a need for traffic control during short-term
parking.
Commissioner Viele stated that so long as it did not apply to residential districts, he was in favor
of such a program.
Commissioner Lindall suggested that using under-utilized parking lots would be beneficial to the
community.
Rachel Friede suggested that Staff believed a conditional use permit process which had clear
regulations may be the correct process for such a program. Furthermore, a conditional use
permit application would allow for a public process that included public input.
Commissioner Viele spoke to the need to introduce some level of competition with other potential
parking providers.
Rachel Friede then discussed the second policy question, which asked how to proceed with
vegetation encroachment into legally established view corridors.
Commissioner Kurz was passionately opposed to vegetation removal because of view corridor
encroachment.
Page 3
Commissioner Viele stated that his concern was that if vegetation was impacting a view corridor
and was not to be removed, then people may argue for increased building encroachment as you
wouldn't see the building encroachment through the landscaping..
The Commissioners stated that they believed the vegetation should be allowed to remain and
language should be added speaking to the encroachment of vegetation over time within view
corridors. Newer view corridors should take into account the species and location of trees to be
planted.
Rachel Friede then discussed the policy question of whether commercial floor area should
continue to be limited within certain zone districts.
The Commissioners generally agreed that 15% commercial should be a permitted use in PA and
PA-2 Districts, and anything above 15% could be a conditional use permit.
Rachel Friede discussed the final question posed to the Commission, which was whether to
allow legally nonconforming properties (excess units/acre) to utilize allowable GRFA.
Commissioner Lindall suggested this was appropriate due to the limitations placed on legally
nonconforming properties.
Commissioner Viele agreed that this was a positive change, because it would result in legally
nonconforming properties to upgrade and utilize their allowable GRFA.
Commissioner Kjesbo stated that this would become a huge benefit for affected properties, and
would be a very positive change.
5 Minutes
4. A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications; and requests for conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12-7H-
2, Permitted and Conditional Uses, Basement or Garden Level; Section 12-7H-3, Permitted and
Conditional Uses, First Floor or Street Level; 12-7H-4, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Second
Floor and Above, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Evergreen Lodge, with
dwelling units, accommodation units, and conference facilities and meeting rooms on the
basement or garden level, multi-family dwelling units, accommodation units and conference
facilities and meetings rooms on the first floor or street level, and a fractional fee club on the
second floor and above, located at 250 South Frontage Road West/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail
Lionshead Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080033, PEC080072)
Applicant: HCT Development, represented by TJ Brink
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION: Table to August 24, 2009
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 5-0-0
5 minutes
5. A request for a work session to discuss the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan,
an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC090014)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to August 10, 2009
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Lindall VOTE: 5-0-0
Page 4
6. Approval of July 13, 2009 minutes
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Kjesbo
7. Information Update
8. Adjournment
MOTION: Kjesbo
SECOND: Viele
VOTE: 4-0-1 (Viele abstained)
VOTE: 5-0-0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published July 24, 2009, in the Vail Daily.
Page 5
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION A...VAIL, CO 81657 1 Classifie... Page I of 3
Home Contribute I Special Guides I Subscribe I Advertise I Place a Classified Ad I Archives I E-edition I RSS Feeds I Contact Us
Site search ■
sponsored by Search
News Sports Entertainment Opinion Living Community Outdoors Photos + Videos Visitors' Guide Games Jobs Real Estate Autos Classifieds
37.0°F F_" Thursday September 24th
Check fcrr,lan Pianist & "C001 Cat", Tinny Gulizia's off-scasnn schedule
CLOSED SUNDAYS THIS FALL
Make Reurvaticrn Online CLICK HERE
Home
Classifieds
Welcome, Guest ❑
LOGIN I Become a Member I What's Thi=
I SCAMBUSTERS I HELP I MANAGE ACCOUNT
Upcoming Events See all events Submit an Event
Search all ads for: -
return to all classifieds
CO 81657 ' Aug 06, 2009 ' ad id: 3845432
< back
LANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
OMMISSION
ugust 10, 2009
WN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
ite Visits:
o site visits
0 minutes
. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new special development
istrict, pursuant to Article 12-9A, Special Development (SDD) District, Vail Town Code, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive,
nits 7 throughl4 (Vail Rowhouses) /Lots 7 through 13, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard
hereto.(PEC090022)
pplicant: Christopher Galvin, represented by K.H. Webb Architects
tanner: Bill Gibson
)TION: SECOND: VOTE:
minutes
A request for a work session to discuss prescribed regulations amendments, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment,
it Town Code, to Title 12, Zoning Regulations. Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto. iPEC090017i
plicant: Town of Vail
inner: Rachel Friede
LOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
minutes
. A request for a work session to discuss a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail
own Code, to allow for the construction of public buildings and grounds (fire station), located at 2399 North Frontage
oad/Parcel A, Resub of Tract D, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090019)
pplicant: Town of Vail
tanner: Bill Gibson
CTION: Table to August 24, 2009
LOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
minutes
. A request for a work session to discuss the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail
ransportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090014)
pplicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel
tanner: Bill Gibson
CTION: Table to August 24, 2009
LOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
minutes
. A request for a work session to discuss the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail
ransportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090014)
pplicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel
tanner: Bill Gibson
CTION: Table to August 24, 2009
LOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
minutes
A request for final review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12-71-5, Conditional Uses: Generally (On All
?vets Of A Building Or Outside Of A Building). Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a public or private
irking lot (parking structures; a vehicle maintenance, service, repair, storage, and fueling facility: a ski lift and tow
ondola), within "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862. 923. 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West, and
ie South Frontage Road West right-of-way/Unplatted (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the
)wn of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080063)
)plicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
anner: Warren Campbell
=TION: Table to October 26. 2009
OTION: SECOND: VOTE:
minutes
A request for a final review of major exterior alterations, pursuant to Section 12-71-7, Exterior Alterations or
odifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the area known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), with
ultiple mixed-use structures including but not limited to, multiple-family dwelling units, fractional fee units,
:commodation units, employee housing units, office, and commercial/ retail uses, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and
9124/2009 Vail Town and Country Art Show
9/24/2009 Ceramic Artist Studio Sale
9/24/2009 Baby Story Time
9/2412009 Toddler Storytimes
9124/2009 Carcliac Disease Prevention Screening
9/24/2009 Gentle Yoga
9/24/2009 Abs/Butt Blaster
Jobs Real Estate Classifieds
Top Jobs:
http://apps.vaildaily.com/titils/c2/app/v1/index.php?do=adDetail&adId=3845432 09/24/2009
Search
Local Search
Business
Listings: Powered by Local.com
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION A...VAIL, CO 81657 1 Classifie... Page 2 of 3
331 South Frontage Road West, and the South Frontage Road West right -of-way/Unplatted la complete legal description
Great ski vacation
available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard
rentals in Aspen
hereto. (PEC080064)
Condos
resorts &
pplicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
,
tanner: Warren Campbell
homes available:
CTION: Table to October 26, 2009
ev ,-.SkiAspenColorado.net
LOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Vail Luxury Condo
minutes
Rentals
. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulation amendments, pursuant to
Centrally located
ection 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to amend Section 12-10-19, Core Areas Identified, Vail Town Code, to
mend the core area parking maps to include "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead) within the "Commercial Core" designation, and
,
spacious. Dine, shop,
etting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080065)
ski, hike, relax and
pplicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
play!
tanner: Warren Campbell
evevev.MountainHaus.eom
CTION: Table to October 26, 2009
LOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The Colorado Pass
minutes
$449 unlimited
. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to
reck plus
ysto
ne
B
Keystone
2-3-7, Amendments, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of properties from Arterial Business District and unzoned
"
,
, d
ays
Vail &
10
uth Frontage Road West right-of-way which is not zoned to Lionshead Mixed Use-2, properties known as
Ever
ail" (West Lionsheadi, located at 953 and 1031 South Frontage Road West and South Frontage Road West right-of-way, (a
Beaver Creek
omplete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Departmenti, and
ettin
forth details in re
ard thereto
(PEC080061 )
--si--om/coloradopass
g
g
.
pplicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
tanner: Warren Campbell
CTION: Table to October 26, 2009
LOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
0. Approval of July 27, 2009 minutes
LOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
1. Information Update
2. Adjournment
LOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
he applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the
own of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project
rientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
lease call 1970) 479-2138 for additional information.
ion language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for
he Hearing Impaired, for information.
ommunity Development Department
ublished August 7, 2009, in the Vail Daily. (3845432)
< back
I Staff I Site Map I Privacy Policy I Terms of Use I Swift Communications
GET MORE NEWS
http://apps.vaildaily.com/titils/c2/app/v1/index.php?do=adDetail&adId=3845432 09/24/2009
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION A...VAIL, CO 81657 1 Classifie... Page 3 of 3
Aspen - Colorado Breckenridge - Colorado Grand Junction - Colorado
Leadville - Colorado Snowmass - Colorado Eagle Valley - Colorado
Rifle - Colorado C arbondale - Colorado Glenwood Springs - Colorado
Winter Park - Colorado Fort Collins - Colorado Windsor - Colorado
Greeley - Colorado
http://apps.vaildaily.com/titils/c2/app/v1/index.php?do=adDetail&adId=3845432 09/24/2009
=c- c -
C p er- m N Q C'') N = ~ a) Q p a) m om:
c~ > am _U) --p O..Q Ot-C~
a C ~LN- _ CD,- o o ~a)~ c`s 0) as
4 tom ° ca L> o) la) w Y ~~~.a a) ~
CL aa) 0 a) c~ 0 oQ ~C) n aC)
cs Ym n ~m ~.o~cam a)=
7 W O nT ~•c "O 0 ~.N O O W N Q m U E: =.U -Q
OU L'J~a a)L M, `J QL) a) O 09 Q~
W V >.O cz; (1) > 0 Q-U} p , jw Co t= QL Q co
LL 0 C: _0 0 C,
aj m E.E'U 7 cas a)0 o a) os o 0-0nQ) a~)'Cm
Qa W OuS O i~QMCZ 0) (1)O ZOCdN
WUL O~"-= cB O N O O_EO
V O c3 Qa 0- cn N fl N -.N O O
~ 0 ONQ p O M QO- 0= QaL i M L o
ZwLrr U QF- GU)0 _m-TQ~d F- M E: Q AF-d.O
w o~ O O O ~
Q y C~ y 9N ~ ~ w
O oA C d E O E 3 O
o y O O'
m~ U v v, O A ~ O °o
G > m
c3 O w ~ C
O p 04 O p •N
CU 0
> o v a o 3
A U ,2 o o 0
a) p G a po b W
ca C a A H G y
:3 7i -S m
O O y.~ O 4+ .L f.. .Y fC E ~~r~r~~
{Yy" Q. i ~ y
~ 0 ~ .C N 4 ~ •II N ~ V
a O ~ aU " °c .N a b„ c a a •a)
F. N y y ~ o v G
:3 tu
r
a> 8 a> Y w
00 To
OF urj = aoi h G
= F O D o° E o° 3
a U N v
R O y zzO C R1 ~ ~ ~C,
'Y cd L b 13 > O N
a`~i F e w N d ~ O 'D
3 w • a
O G cCd Y Q y o. 'D
a~ .v Y 'O CS ~ a~ H
7F_ O m G d Y O Q
3 E a ca c o M ee4
oN r
O b C .D y G lz
C -L 7+ y 'p y C: X ' C u a) ~ p, a) 3
CO
G a. v .9 a
.2 6
A a3i . m p Q t o b
G Ew G Fx F ~ ~ G
E
O N
0- U).=
=
ai
.0co0
U
`a a)
cS _O L
CU 0-
C
pO.~
0=
~N C1) c~ LM -O
p
r U)
NO
Cn a'O) Q
a
~ F
D
a)
Q)
0
0
N
N
0 N
L _
~ n
:3 r
a- CM
N
O
=a
co O
a~
J m
W O
gzA
U
0.0.
A
a) ~
P. z
0
N
.i
i
z
L
X
G
O
E
0
U
T