HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-0628 PECPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
June 28, 2010
1:OOpm
T�N�V OVAIL
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visits:
1. Solaris - 143 East Meadow Drive
2. Alpine Tavern - 4695 Meadow Drive
45 minutes
1. A request for the review of a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business Identification Signs, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and Appeals, Vail Town Code, to allow for
business identification signs larger than 6 sq.ft. in area, located at 143 East Meadow Drive
(Solaris) /Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC 100029)
Applicant: Peter Knobel, represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
30 minutes
2. A request for the review of a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business Identification Signs, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and Appeals, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
freestanding business identification sign, located at 4695 Meadow Drive (Vail Racquet Club
Clubhouse) /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100030)
Applicant: Alpine Tavern Inc., represented by Bill Stewart
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
60 minutes
3. A request for a work session on a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the area known
as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), with multiple mixed -use structures including but not limited to,
multiple - family dwelling units, fractional fee units, accommodation units, employee housing units,
office, and commercial /retail uses, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage
Road West, and the South Frontage Road West rig ht -of- way /Unplatted (a complete legal
description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department),
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080064)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
4. Report to the Planning and Environmental Commission of an administrative action approving a
request for a minor amendment to SDD No. 6, Village Inn Plaza, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10,
Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for modifications to the approved
development plans to increase site coverage and commercial floor area and reduce the side
setback (east side) to facilitate a new restaurant, located at 68 East Meadow Drive, Unit 602/ Lot
O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100031)
Page 1
Applicant: Joe Staufer, represented by John G. Martin, Architect
Planner: Rachel Friede
5 minutes
5. A request for the review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review
Procedures, Vail Town Code, to create Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch, from Part of Lot 9,
Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision (Red Sandstone Parking Lot), located at 715 North
Frontage Road West/Lot 9, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC100027)
Applicant: Robert & Diane Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail
Town Code, for a zone district boundary amendment to rezone Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch
Subdivision, (formerly Part of Lot 9, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision) from Medium Density
Multiple Family (MDMF) District to the Housing (H) District, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC100028)
Applicant: Robert & Diane Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
7. A request for an amendment to an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12- 61 -11,
Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the
required landscape plan and geologic hazard mitigation plan for the redevelopment of the
easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments; and a request for the review of
a variance, from Section 14 -5 -1, Minimum Standards, Parking Lot and Parking Structure Design
Standards for All Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code,
to allow for a crossover drive aisle width of less than thirty -feet (30') within the required parking
structure, located at 1280 North Frontage Road /Lots 1 -5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing
1,and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100018 /PEC100019)
Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge L.L.C.
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
8. A request for final review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -5, Conditional
Uses: Generally (On All Levels Of A Building Or Outside Of A Building), Vail Town Code, to allow
for the development of a public or private parking lot (parking structure); a vehicle maintenance,
service, repair, storage, and fueling facility; a ski lift and tow (gondola), within "Ever Vail" (West
Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West, and the South
Frontage Road West rig ht-of-way/U n platted (a complete legal description is available for
inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC080063)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
9. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary
amendment, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of
properties from Arterial Business District and unzoned South Frontage Road West right -of -way
Page 2
which is not zoned to Lionshead Mixed Use -2, properties known as "Ever Vail" (West
Lionshead), located at 953 and 1031 South Frontage Road West and South Frontage Road
West right -of -way, (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail
Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080061)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
10. A request for a final review of a variance from 12- 71 -14, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, to allow for additional site coverage below grade, within
"Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 934 (BP Site), 953 (Vail Professional Building), 1031
(Cascade Crossing) S. Frontage Road / Unplatted; 862 (VR Maintenance Shop) and 923 (Holy
Cross Lot) S. Frontage Road / Tracts A and B, S. Frontage Road Subdivision; 1000 (Glen Lyon
Office Building) S. Frontage Road / Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision (a complete legal description
is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090035)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
11. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a proposed major amendment
to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special
Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the removal of the Glen Lyon Commercial
Site, Development Area D, (Glen Lyon Office Building) from the District for incorporation into the
properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West /Lot
54 Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090036)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
12. Approval of June 14, 2010 minutes
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
13. Information Update
14. Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970)
479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published June 25, 2010, in the Vail Daily.
Page 3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: June 28, 2010
SUBJECT: A request for the review of a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business
Identification Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and
Appeals, Vail Town Code, to allow for business identification signs larger than 6
sq. ft. in area, located at 141 East Meadow Drive (Solaris) /Lot P, Block 5D, Vail
Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100029)
Applicant: Peter Knobel, represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: Warren Campbell
SUMMARY
The applicant, Peter Knobel, represented by the Mauriello Planning Group, is requesting
a sign variance to allow for business identification signs for all commercial tenants
located at 141 East Meadow Drive in the Solaris project to exceed the permitted six (6)
square feet and be a maximum of 12 square feet in size.
Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends denial of the variance application subject to the findings noted in Section
VIII of this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicant, Peter Knobel, represented by the Mauriello Planning Group, is requesting
a sign variance to allow for a maximum of 12 square foot business identification signs for
all commercial tenants within the Solaris project. The Town's current sign regulations
allow business identification signs to be no larger than six (6) square feet in area.
The applicant is proposing to allow all commercial tenants on the plaza and promenade
levels of the Solaris project to request business identification signs up to a maximum of
12 square feet. Business identification signs can be either wall mounted (flush), awning,
or projecting (perpendicularly mounted).
The applicant suggests that there are several reasons which warrant a variance which
complies with the criteria found in Section VII of this memorandum. Those reasons
include the scale and design of the structure which was the result of provisions of the
Vail Village Master Plan identifying a need for a public plaza on the Solaris development
site. The incorporation of this public need resulted in commercial tenants being located
approximately 140 feet from East Meadow Drive at its greatest point, thus out of the
primary flow of pedestrians. The applicant believes that a variance for increased sign
area is warranted in order for signs to be readily identifiable from East Meadow Drive
and to be in greater keeping with scale and architecture of the structure.
The applicant's request (Attachment A) and correspondence from an adjacent property
owner (Attachment B) are attached for review.
III. BACKGROUND
In 2003, the Town of Vail adopted new sign regulations. Solaris, being zoned Special
Development District No. 39 with an underlying zoning of Commercial Service Center,
was designated as part of Sign District 1. Sign District 1 includes all properties except
those zoned Arterial Business District (Cascade Crossing and the Vail Professional
Building) and Commercial Core 3 (West Vail commercial area). The regulations for Sign
District 1 were primarily drafted in context of the existing pedestrian oriented businesses
in Vail Village and Lionshead.
The 2003 sign code amendments eliminated the previous sliding scale sign area limits
that were proportional to the physical length of a business's frontage and replaced the
sign area limits with a flat six (6) square foot maximum. The purpose of the six (6)
square foot sign area limit was to create consistency of scale for signage in Vail Village
and Lionshead, to create equity among businesses owners, to simplify the sign
application review process, and to simplify the enforcement of the sign regulations.
On March 21, 2006, the Solaris development became fully entitled through the approval
of the second reading of Ordinance No. 5, Series of 2006.
On May 18, 2010, through Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, amendments to the Sign
Code were adopted by the Town Council resulting in the promenade level of the Solaris
project being defined as first floor thus allowing a maximum of six (6) square foot signs
verse four (4) square foot signs if the commercial spaces were defined as being on the
second floor. In addition, amendments allowing for entertainment use to have signage
with a maximum size of 15 square feet was approved.
IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff believes that the following provisions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to the
review of this proposal:
TITLE 11: SIGN REGULATIONS (in part)
11 -1: DESCRIPTION, PURPOSE, AND APPLICABILITY (in part)
11 -1 -2: Purpose:
A. General Purpose: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town of Vail and to promote the
coordinated and harmonious design and placement of signs in the town in a manner that
will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a
resort and residential community of the highest quality.
B. Specific Purpose: These regulations are intended to achieve the following specific
purposes:
1. To describe and enable the fair and consistent enforcement of signs in the
town of Vail.
2. To encourage the establishment of well designed, creative signs that enhance
the unique character of Vail's village atmosphere.
3. To preserve a successful and high quality business environment that is aided
by signs that identify, direct, and inform.
4. To aid in providing for the growth of an orderly, safe, beautiful, and viable
community
11 -6: BUSINESS AND BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNS (in part)
11 -6 -1: Purpose and Description:
Business and building identification signs are meant to identify and inform through the
display of the business and /or building name and any graphic symbols or language
pertinent to the advertised enterprise. This chapter covers all of the technical information
related to business and building identification signs. All business and building
identification signs shall comply with the standards outlined in this chapter and shall be
subject to design review.
11 -6 -2: Sign District:
A. Sign District 1 (SD 1): All of Vail except for property zoned ABD and M.
B. Sign District 2 (SD 2): All property zoned ABD and CC3 (West Vail and Cascade
Crossing).
C. Sign District 3 (SD 3): West Vail Interchange (CDOT right of way).
11 -6 -3: Business Sign:
A. Business Identification Signs:
1. Business identification signs in sign district 1 (SD 1):
a. Number: Each business shall be allowed one business identification sign per
public entrance.
b. Area: The allowable area of each business identification sign shall be up
to six (6) square feet.
c. Height: Projecting and awning signs shall have a minimum clearance of eight
feet (8) above pedestrianways and a minimum clearance of fifteen feet (15)
above vehicularways. No part of any business identification sign shall extend
more than twenty five feet (25) above existing grade.
d. Location: Business identification signs shall be located on the business
frontage.
e. Type Of Sign: Business identification signs shall not be freestanding.
f Businesses Not On The First Floor: Businesses not located on the first floor
shall be allowed only one projecting sign with a maximum area of four (4) square
feet; location shall be subject to design review.
11 -10: VARIANCES AND APPEALS (in part)
11 -10 -1: Variances
A. Purpose: A variance from the sign regulations constitutes relief from the strict
interpretation of the standards and may be granted by the Planning and Environmental
Commission (PEC) in cases where there exists a physical limitation that prevents the
existence, placement, or operation of a sign in compliance with the standards of this title.
Vail Village Master Plan (in part)
OPEN SPACE PLAN
Four different classifications of open space are indicated on the Open Space Plan. The
types of open space vary from greenbelt natural open space to the more urbanized
open space created by the Village's numerous public plazas. While the role of each of
these forms of open space varies, they all contribute to the recreational, aesthetic, and
environmental features of the Village. For the purposes of this Plan, open space is
defined as conditions at the existing natural grade of the land. The following further
defines each of these four types of open space:
Plazas with Greenspace: Plazas with greenspace are "urban open space." They
contribute significantly to the streetscape fabric of the Village. Formed in large part by
the buildings and spaces around them, plazas with greenspace provide relief from the
built environment, a place for people to gather or relax, areas for special entertainment
or other activities and possible location for landscaping, water features, benches and
public art.
#1 -6 Crossroads Infill
Commercial infill over new underground parking lot in conjunction with a large public
plaza with greenspace area (existing and new parking demand to be provided on site).
While configuration of infill may be done a number of ways, it is the overall intention to
replace existing surface parking with pedestrian corridors into a commercial area, as well
as to provide a strong building edge on Meadow Drive and streetscape improvements.
4
Improvement of the planted buffer adjacent to the Frontage Road is also important.
Relocation of loading and delivery functions and entry to parking structure from Frontage
Road is strongly encouraged to reduce traffic on Meadow Drive. Potential to improve
fire access also exists in the redevelopment scheme. Special emphasis on 2.4, 2.5,26,
3.1, 4.1, 5.1, 6.1, 6.2.
V. SITE ANALYSIS
Address:
Legal Description:
Sign District:
Zone District:
Current Land Use
Standard
Type of Sign
Sign Area (max)
VI
141 Meadow Drive
Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1
Sign District 1
SDD No. 39 with Commercial Service Center underlying
Mixed Use
Allowed /Required
Business Identification
6 square feet
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Proposed Sign
Business Identification
12 square feet
Zoning District
No zoning
Public Accommodation /Commercial Core 2
General Use District
SDD No. 6 /Public Accommodation District
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Section 11 -10 -1,
Variances, Vail Town Code.
1. Special circumstances or conditions must exist that apply to the land,
buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures, or other matters on adjacent
lots or within the adjacent right of way, that would substantially restrict the
effectiveness of the sign in question. However, such circumstances must be
unique to the subject site.
Being zoned Commercial Service Center, with an overlay of SDD No. 39, Solaris is
located in Sign District 1. As described in Section III of this memorandum, the Sign
District 1 regulations were drafted primarily to address the environment contained within
Vail's pedestrian commercial villages. The Solaris development is located within Vail
Village which is a pedestrian oriented environment. To strengthen the success of Vail
Village as a pedestrian village the Town adopted the Vail Village Master Plan on January
16, 1990, to address short term and long term goals and objectives. The Master Plan
did offer specific recommendations for certain properties and locations within Vail
Village. One of those recommendations was the inclusion of a public plaza on the
Crossroads (Solaris) site. These recommendations are found in their entirety under
Section III of this memorandum.
Existing Use
North:
Interstate R.O.W
South:
Mixed Use
East:
Public Parking
West:
Mixed Use
Proposed Sign
Business Identification
12 square feet
Zoning District
No zoning
Public Accommodation /Commercial Core 2
General Use District
SDD No. 6 /Public Accommodation District
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Section 11 -10 -1,
Variances, Vail Town Code.
1. Special circumstances or conditions must exist that apply to the land,
buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures, or other matters on adjacent
lots or within the adjacent right of way, that would substantially restrict the
effectiveness of the sign in question. However, such circumstances must be
unique to the subject site.
Being zoned Commercial Service Center, with an overlay of SDD No. 39, Solaris is
located in Sign District 1. As described in Section III of this memorandum, the Sign
District 1 regulations were drafted primarily to address the environment contained within
Vail's pedestrian commercial villages. The Solaris development is located within Vail
Village which is a pedestrian oriented environment. To strengthen the success of Vail
Village as a pedestrian village the Town adopted the Vail Village Master Plan on January
16, 1990, to address short term and long term goals and objectives. The Master Plan
did offer specific recommendations for certain properties and locations within Vail
Village. One of those recommendations was the inclusion of a public plaza on the
Crossroads (Solaris) site. These recommendations are found in their entirety under
Section III of this memorandum.
It is a fact that through the entitlement process the Solaris project was reviewed for its
compliance with not only the Town Zoning Code, but the Vail Village Master Plan as
well. The plaza contained within the Solaris project is roughly 24,000 square feet (0.5
acre) in area with a depth of approximately 140 feet from the edge of East Meadow
Drive. This plaza contains an ice rink for the winter and grass area for the summer, two
pieces of unique art, and a movie theater and bowling alley public benefit which is
required to operate through development agreements. These activity attractors and
generators were located in the plaza consciously to draw people to the space and to
enliven it with activity. The applicant suggests that the plaza is off of the main flow of
pedestrian activity and that the larger signs are necessary to clearly identify what
commercial opportunities exist. The plaza at Solaris will have a public pedestrian
easement placed upon it prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy. Staff does
not agree with this assessment and believes the public pedestrian easement along with
the attractors and activity generators listed above that the plaza will sufficient draw
people into the project.
Staff believes that throughout the pedestrian villages there are areas which are outside
the primary pedestrian flow, however, remain successful as the pedestrian villages are a
place of exploration with varying attractors located throughout, such as public art. Some
of these areas are Wall Street, the Gore Creek Promenade, Arrabelle plaza, Vail Village
Inn, and Concert Hall Plaza connection to West Lionshead Circle. Furthermore, the
curvilinear nature of many of our streets creates smaller places with an excitement to
continue forward, for example Bridge Street. All of these locations share a common sign
area size requirement of six (6) square feet.
Staff does not believe the proposed variance request is consistent with this criterion as
the site does not possess a unique circumstance on the subject site.
2. The applicant shall not have created the circumstances that have necessitated
the variance request.
Staff believes the proposed variance request is not consistent with this criterion since the
current sign regulations were in place well before the entitlement of the Solaris project.
While a portion of the design was driven by the location of a public plaza on the site the
final design was the vision of the applicant. The applicant's choice to enter the special
development district process verse the utilization of the existing Commercial Service
Center District zoning resulted in a structure which may be of a scale by which the
applicant feels larger signs are appropriate. Staff does not share this belief and feel that
six (6) square feet signs are adequately legible from the Solaris plaza and East Meadow
Drive.
3. The applicant must demonstrate that the granting of the variance will be in
general harmony with the purposes of this title.
Staff believes that the granting of a variance for increased business identification
signage area would result in a disruption to the harmony and equity of the application of
the Sign Code to all commercial tenants in the pedestrian villages. Staff does not
believe this variance request is consistent with the specific purposes of the Town's sign
regulations and the purpose of the business identification sign regulations as stated
below:
6
Pursuant to Section 11- 1 -2 -B: Specific Purpose, Vail Town Code, purposes of the
Town's sign regulations are:
"1. To describe and enable the fair and consistent enforcement of signs in the
town of Vail.
2. To encourage the establishment of well designed, creative signs that enhance
the unique character of Vail's village atmosphere.
3. To preserve a successful and high quality business environment that is aided
by signs that identify, direct, and inform.
4. To aid in providing for the growth of an orderly, safe, beautiful, and viable
community. "
Pursuant to Section 11 -6 -1, Purpose and Description, Vail Town Code, the purpose of
the Town's business identification signs is as follows:
"Business and building identification signs are meant to identify and inform
through the display of the business and /or building name and any graphic
symbols or language pertinent to the advertised enterprise. "
VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends denial of the applicant's
request of a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business Identification Signs, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and Appeals, Vail Town Code, to allow for
business identification signs larger than six (6) square feet in area, located at 141 East
Meadow Drive (Solaris) /Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. This recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in
Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the following motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission denies the applicant's request of
a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business Identification Signs, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and Appeals, Vail Town Code, to allow for
business identification signs larger than six (6) square feet in area, located at 141
East Meadow Drive (Solaris) /Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. "
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes
the following findings:
'Based upon a review of Section Vll of the Staff's June 28, 2010, memorandum
to the Planning and Environmental Commission, the site visit, and the evidence
and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
No special circumstances and conditions, unique to the subject site, exist that
apply to the land, buildings, topography, vegetation, and sign structures that
would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question.
7
2. The applicant created the circumstances that have necessitated this variance
request.
3. The applicant has not demonstrated that the granting of this variance is in
general harmony with the purposes of Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town
Code. "
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Applicant's request entitled Solaris Sign Variance dated June 1, 2010
B. Letter from adjacent property owner dated June 16, 2010
SOLARIS SIGN VARIANCE
Solaris
141 E. Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81631
Submitted June 1, 2010
SUMAN I J� 110
,i 4 i I Mauriello Planning Group
Attachment A
I. Introduction
There is no denying the elegance and beauty of Solaris. With high -end,
sophisticated materials, graceful architecture, charming public art, and substantial
public plaza and skating rink, Solaris has set a new bar for development projects in
the Town of Vail. With over 70,000 sf of varied commercial uses spanning two
levels, Solaris is nearly 20% of the existing commercial square footage of Vail Village
in a significant structure in Vail Village. 5
When Solaris was originally being
considered by the Town of Vail, the signage
allowance was based on frontage. As a
result, larger tenant space got larger signs.
In 2007, the Town of Vail undertook a
comprehensive revision to the Sign Code
and limited all signs in the Village and
Lionshead (generally) to a maximum of 6 sf.
The methodology for measuring signage
was also amended. The net effect of the
amendments was to reduce the allowable
signage for commercial uses. In the
Village, where buildings are generally only
2 -3 stories and where pedestrians walk a
few feet from storefronts, 6 sf is
appropriate. However, for larger buildings
6 sf proves to be inadequate.
As the construction fencing has come
down, and retail tenants have been
exploring signage, it has become
apparent that 6 sf is inappropriate for
storefronts on a building the size of Solaris.
As mock -ups have been hung on -site for
previous sign applications, even staff and
various board members have commented
on the ineffectiveness of these small signs.
It is in everyone's best interest that the retail
establishments be successful. The Town's
budget is largely dependent on sales tax.
The graphic on this page takes an
individual commercial tenant space and
indicates the size of a sign at 6 sf, 12 sf, and
15 sf. This graphic clearly indicates the lack
of proportionality of a 6 sf sign in relation to
a storefront on a building of thie size.
4 \ ELEVATION A- 15 SQ. FT. SIGN
5 ELEVATION A- 12 SQ. FT. SIGN_
uM 1' =4'-T
4
6 ELEVATION A - 6 8Q. FT. SIGN
uae 1• =4' W
Solaris Sign Variance 2
Because Solaris was a Special Development District, it seems appropriate that in the
review of the deviations from the underlying zone district, it would have been an
option to deviate from the signage requirements. However, when the amendments
were adopted, no such option was included in the Sign Code. As a result, a
variance request is the only avenue that is available to allow for additional
signage. Unlike a Zoning Code variance, there are only three criteria for review of
a Sign Variance. The criteria are provided in the Section III of this submittal.
II. Variance Request
Currently, the Sign Code limits a business identification sign to 6 sf, including all
letters, graphics and sign base material, including framing. Only brackets and
fixtures are not included in the sign measurement. The sign is measured using two
imaginary polygons enclosing everything. Solaris is requesting a variance for all
business identification signs to allow for a total size allowance of 12 sf. This 12 sf
would not include any framing, base material, or fixtures.
M. Criteria for Approval
A. Special circumstances or conditions must exist that apply to the land,
buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures, or other matters on
adjacent lots or within the adjacent right of way, that would substantially
restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question. However, such circumstances
must be unique to the subject site.
Applicant Response: Solaris was approved as a Special Development District,
with numerous public benefits far outweighing the benefits found in any other
SDD in the Town of Vail.
Included in the public
benefit package is a movie
theater, a bowling alley,
and large public plaza with
an ice skating rink. These
public benefits required a
larger building than
typically approved in Vail
Village, but it was believed
that these public benefits
far outweighed the impacts
of additional bulk and mass
that was granted to Solaris.
The public plaza specifically
lead to a design of a
building where the mass, which would have typically been spread over the
entire site, is concentrated and setback from the public right -of -way. As a
result, the majority of the commercial tenant spaces are not adjacent to the
Solaris Sign Variance 3
public way, and are instead set back approximately 120 ft. This creates
issues with visibility. This is completely unique to Solaris, as no other developer
in Town has been willing to devote such a large portion of developable land
for public purposes. The public plaza was mandated by the Vail Village
Master Plan.
B. The applicant shall not have created the circumstances that have
necessitated the variance request.
Applicant Response: Implementation of the Town's policy recommending
the establishment of a large public plaza created the condition and situation
that exists today. The Town's desire for the public plaza created the hardship.
C. The applicant must demonstrate that the granting of the variance will be in
general harmony with the purposes of this title.
Applicant Response: Title 11 of the Vail Town Code provides the purposes of
the Sign Regulations:
General Purpose: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting
the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town of Vail and to
promote the coordinated and harmonious design and placement of signs in the
town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its
established character as a resort and residential community of the highest
quality.
Specific Purpose: These regulations are intended to achieve the following
specific purposes:
1. To describe and enable the fair and consistent enforcement of signs in the
town of Vail.
2. To encourage the establishment of well designed, creative signs that
enhance the unique character of Vail's village atmosphere.
3. To preserve a successful and high quality business environment that is aided
by signs that identify, direct, and inform.
4. To aid in providing for the growth of an orderly, safe, beautiful, and viable
community.
The purposes of the Sign Regulations can be generally summed up in one as:
to allow for a fair and adequate amount of signage that is well- designed,
successful and complementary to the Town. The variance will allow signs
and surrounding text to be scaled appropriately. The granting of this
variance clearly furthers these purposes.
Solaris Sign Variance 4
IV. Adjacents
C/O FINANCE DEPT
75 S FRONTAGE RD
VAIL, CO 81657
HIBBERD, FRED, JR
400 NW RIDGE RD
JACKSON, WY 83001
VAIL CORE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
VAIL TAX & ACCOUNTING, INC.
P O BOX 5940
AVON, CO 81620
VILLAGE CENTER ASSOCIATION
PO BOX 5968
VAIL, CO 81658
VAIL DOVER ASSOCIATES LLC
4148 N ARCADIA DR
PHOENIX, AZ 85018
TALISMAN CONDO ASSOC.
W. THOMAS SAALFELD
62 E MEADOW DR
VAIL, CO 81657
SONNENALP PROPERTIES INC
20 VAIL RD
VAIL, CO 81657
VAIL VILLAGE PLAZA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
C/O ABPLANALP LAW OFFICE LLC,
POST OFFICE BOX 2800
VAIL, CO 81658, UNITED STATES
VILLAGE INN PLAZA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
JOSEF STAUFER
100 E MEADOW DR #31
VAIL, CO 81657, UNITED STATES
VILLAGE INN PLAZA -PHASE V CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
100 EAST MEADOW DRIVE STE 31
VAIL, CO 81657
VILLAGE INN PLAZA CONDOMINIUM
COLORADO REGISTRATION, INC.
880 HOMESTEAD DRIVE, NO. 25
EDWARDS, CO 81632
VILLAGE INN PLAZA -PHASE V CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
COLORADO REGISTRATION, INC
880 HOMESTEAD DRIVE NO. 25
EDWARDS, CO 81632
VILLAGE INN PLAZA -PHASE V CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
COLORADO REGISTRATION, INC
PO BOX 666
VAIL, CO 81658
VILLAGE INN PLAZA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
COLORADO REGISTRATION, INC.
POST OFFICE BOX 666
VAIL, CO 81658
VAIL VILLAGE PLAZA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
143 E. MEADOW DRIVE NO. 360
C/O SLIFER MANAGEMENT CO
VAIL, CO 81657
VAIL VILLAGE PLAZA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION
SALLY HANLON
385 GORE CREEK DRIVE- NO. R -2
VAIL, CO 81657
AUSTRIA HAUS CONDO ASSOC INC
242 E MEADOW DR.
VAIL, CO 81657
ANN BISHOP
VAIL VILLAGE INN PHASE III ASSOC
PO BOX 820
VAIL, CO 81658
C DOT
4201 E. ARKANSAS AVENUE
DENVER, CO 80222
MAURIELLO PLANNING GROUP, LLC
POST OFFICE BOX 1 127
AVON, CO 81620
SOLARIS
2211 NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD, SUITE A
VAIL, CO 81657
06/21/2010) Warren Cam bell Re Solaris Sign Variance _.._......._.._. Page 1
From: Thomas Byrnes <tbyrnes7 @comcast.net>
To: Warren Campbell <WCampbell @vailgov.com>
Date: 6/16/2010 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: Solaris Sign Variance
Mr. Campbell,
My comments on the signage issue are for the existing codes be keep in place. A "building of this size"
should not increase the signage in proportion to the facade which is quite large. The intent is not having
the signs visible from the International Bridge. The foot traffic will be very close to the signs and the 6 sq.
ft. signs should fit well with the exterior. Most visitors will soon know where Solaris is located thus
facilitating direction giving to a particular commercial establishment at Solaris by "the store you are looking
for is in the Solaris Building ". We all want the merchants to fair well in todays business climate in Vail but
also need to keep the appeal of a clean, modern, ski village intact.
Best,
Thomas Byrnes, President
Vail Core Condominiums
On Jun 15, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Warren Campbell wrote:
> Mr. Byrnes,
> Please find attached the information you requested. You can send any letter you would like to become a
part of the record of the PEC hearing to me attached to an email.
>
> Regards,
• Warren Campbell
• Chief of Planning
• Town of Vail
> <Solaris Sign Variance Request[1].pdf>
Thomas Byrnes
tbyrnes7@comcast.net
303.530.0982
Attachment B
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: June 28, 2010
SUBJECT: A request for the review of a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business
Identification Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and
Appeals, Vail Town Code, to allow for a freestanding business identification sign,
located at 4695 Meadow Drive (Vail Racquet Club Clubhouse) /Unplatted, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100030)
Applicant: Alpine Tavern Inc., represented by Bill Stewart
Planner: Bill Gibson
SUMMARY
The applicant, Alpine Tavern Inc., represented by Bill Stewart, is requesting a sign
variance to allow for the installation of a freestanding business identification sign in
excess of 6 sq.ft. for the new restaurant located in the Vail Racquet Club Clubhouse at
4695 Meadow Drive.
Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends approval, with conditions, of the variance application subject to the
findings noted in Section VIII of this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicant, Alpine Tavern Inc., represented by Bill Stewart, is requesting a sign
variance to allow for an 9 sq. ft. freestanding business identification sign for the new
restaurant located in the Vail Racquet Club Clubhouse at 4695 Meadow Drive.
The applicant is proposing to replace the previous Bighorn Bistro's 9 sq.ft. freestanding
sign with a new sign for the now open Alpine Tavern restaurant. The applicant is
proposing to install a new sign the same size, shape, and configuration as the previous
restaurant's sign. The previous restaurant's sign was a 36" x 36" square and installed in
the existing freestanding sign bracket located in the landscaping median between the
Vail Racquet Club Clubhouse parking lot and Meadow Drive.
The Town's current sign regulations allow business identification signs to be no larger
than 6 sq. ft. in area and do not allow business identification signs to be freestanding.
Pursuant to Section 11 -9 -3, Nonconforming Signs, Vail Town Code, the former Bighorn
Bistro sign should be replaced with a sign conforming to these standards when the
business changes name and needs a new sign.
A vicinity map (Attachment A), the applicants' request (Attachment B), and site
photographs (Attachment C) are attached for review.
BACKGROUND
The Vail Racquet Club obtained its original development rights under Eagle County
jurisdiction and was annexed into the Town of Vail in 1974. According to Eagle County
Assessor's records, the existing clubhouse building was constructed in 1977.
In 1999, the previous 9 sq.ft. Bighorn Bistro freestanding business identification sign was
installed with Town of Vail design review approval in the landscaping median between
the Vail Racquet Club Clubhouse parking lot and Meadow Drive.
In 2003, the Town of Vail adopted new sign regulations. The Vail Racquet Club, being
zoned Medium Density Multiple - Family District, was designated as part of Sign District 1.
Sign District 1 includes all properties except those zoned Arterial Business District
(Cascade Crossing) and Commercial Core 3 (West Vail commercial area). The
regulations of Sign District 1 were primarily drafted in context of the existing pedestrian
oriented businesses in Vail Village and Lionshead. The regulations of Sign District 2
were drafted in the context of the existing vehicular oriented businesses at Cascade
Crossing and West Vail.
The 2003 sign code amendments eliminated the previous sliding scale sign area limits
that were proportional to the physical length of a business's frontage and replaced the
sign area limits with a flat 6 sq. ft. maximum. The purpose of the 6 sq.ft. sign area limit
was to create consistency of scale for signage in Vail Village and Lionshead, to create
equity among businesses owners, to simplify the sign application review process, and to
simplify the enforcement of the sign regulations.
The 2003 sign code amendments also prohibited the installation of freestanding
business identification signs in Sign District 1. Building identification, joint directory,
subdivision entrance, and other sign categories are allowed to be freestanding type
signs.
The 2003 sign code amendments rendered the previous Bighorn Bistro's freestanding
business identification sign legally non - conforming (grandfathered) in regard to the
Town's sign regulations.
In 2010, the applicant opened a new restaurant in the former Bighorn Bistro space in the
Vail Racquet Club Clubhouse.
IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff believes that the following provisions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to the
review of this proposal:
TITLE 11: SIGN REGULATIONS (in part)
11 -1: DESCRIPTION, PURPOSE, AND APPLICABILITY (in part)
11 -1 -2: Purpose:
A. General Purpose: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town of Vail and to promote the
coordinated and harmonious design and placement of signs in the town in a manner that
will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a
resort and residential community of the highest quality.
B. Specific Purpose: These regulations are intended to achieve the following specific
purposes:
1. To describe and enable the fair and consistent enforcement of signs in the
town of Vail.
2. To encourage the establishment of well designed, creative signs that enhance
the unique character of Vail's village atmosphere.
3. To preserve a successful and high quality business environment that is aided
by signs that identify, direct, and inform.
4. To aid in providing for the growth of an orderly, safe, beautiful, and viable
community
11 -6: BUSINESS AND BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNS (in part)
11 -6 -1: Purpose and Description:
Business and building identification signs are meant to identify and inform through the
display of the business and /or building name and any graphic symbols or language
pertinent to the advertised enterprise. This chapter covers all of the technical information
related to business and building identification signs. All business and building
identification signs shall comply with the standards outlined in this chapter and shall be
subject to design review.
11 -6 -2: Sign District:
A. Sign District 1 (SD 1): All of Vail except for property zoned ABD and M.
B. Sign District 2 (SD 2): All property zoned ABD and CC3 (West Vail and Cascade
Crossing).
C. Sign District 3 (SD 3): West Vail Interchange (CDOT right of way).
11 -6 -3: Business Sign:
A. Business Identification Signs:
1. Business identification signs in sign district 1 (SD 1):
a. Number: Each business shall be allowed one business identification sign per
public entrance.
b. Area: The allowable area of each business identification sign shall be up
to six (6) square feet.
c. Height: Projecting and awning signs shall have a minimum clearance of eight
feet (8) above pedestrianways and a minimum clearance of fifteen feet (15)
above vehicularways. No part of any business identification sign shall extend
more than twenty five feet (25) above existing grade.
d. Location: Business identification signs shall be located on the business
frontage.
e. Type Of Sign: Business identification signs shall not be freestanding.
f Businesses Not On The First Floor: Businesses not located on the first floor
shall be allowed only one projecting sign with a maximum area of four (4) square
feet; location shall be subject to design review.
11 -9: EXEMPT, PROHIBITED, AND NONCONFORMING SIGNS (in part)
11 -9 -3: NONCONFORMING SIGNS:
A. Definition: Any sign erected prior to the enactment of this title and in accord with the
town of Vail approval process, that does not conform to the provisions set forth herein
(as determined by the administrative procedure listed below), or is located in newly
annexed territory, shall be designated as nonconforming.
B. Continuation of a Nonconforming Sign: Any sign which has been determined to be
nonconforming may continue in use and operation as a nonconforming sign pending the
following provisions:
1. Any nonconforming sign that is not maintained, at the discretion of the
administrator and according to section 11 -2 -1 of this title, shall be removed by
the administrator (section 11 -11 -3 of this title) and shall be replaced as a
conforming sign, in accordance with the regulations in this title.
2. All nonconforming signs shall be brought into conformance with the
regulations in this title at the time that the represented business changes
ownership, provided that the business changes its name and /or offered services,
thereby requiring a new sign, or at the time that the represented business
changes its name and /or services offered, thereby requiring a new sign.
V
11 -10: VARIANCES AND APPEALS (in part)
11 -10 -1: Variances
A. Purpose: A variance from the sign regulations constitutes relief from the strict
interpretation of the standards and may be granted by the Planning and Environmental
Commission (PEC) in cases where there exists a physical limitation that prevents the
existence, placement, or operation of a sign in compliance with the standards of this title.
SITE ANALYSIS
Address: 4695 Meadow Drive
Legal Description: Unplatted
Sign District: Sign District 1
Zone District: Medium Density Multiple - Family District
Current Land Use: Mixed Use
Standard Allowed /Required Previous Sign Proposed Sign
Type of Sign
Sign Area (max)
Not Freestanding
(awning, projecting,
wall, etc.)
6 sq.ft.
Freestanding
9 sq.ft.
Freestanding
9 sq.ft.
4
VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Existing Use Zoning District
North: Gore Creek Low Density Multiple - Family District
South: Tennis Courts and Open Space Residential Cluster
East: Residential Low Density Multiple - Family District
West: Residential Low Density Multiple - Family District
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Section 11 -10 -1,
Variances, Vail Town Code.
1. Special circumstances or conditions must exist that apply to the land,
buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures, or other matters on adjacent
lots or within the adjacent right of way, that would substantially restrict the
effectiveness of the sign in question. However, such circumstances must be
unique to the subject site.
Staff believes the proposed variance request is consistent with this criterion due to
several circumstances unique to the subject site.
Being zoned Medium Density Multiple Family District; the Vail Racquet Club is located in
Sign District 1. As further described in Section III of this memorandum, the Sign District
1 regulations were drafted in 2003 primarily in the context of the existing pedestrian
oriented businesses in Vail Village and Lionshead. The subject property is located in the
residential East Vail neighborhood. The subject property is not a pedestrian oriented
business like other Sign District 1 designated restaurants in the Vail Village and
Lionshead commercial core areas. The subject property is also not located in a
vehicular oriented commercial neighborhood like the Sign District 2 restaurants in
Cascade Crossing and West Vail.
The Vail Racquet Club was developed in the 1970's and the clubhouse has included a
restaurant use for many years. The previous restaurant at the Vail Racquet Club
clubhouse was the Bighorn Bistro. In 1999, the former Bighorn Bistro obtained Town of
Vail design review approval for a 9 sq.ft. freestanding sign located in the landscape
median between the clubhouse parking lot and Meadow Drive. As further described in
Section III of this memorandum, the Town's 2003 sign regulation amendments rendered
the previous restaurant's sign legally non - conforming. The applicant is proposing to
install a sign for the new Alpine Tavern restaurant that is the same size, shape, and
configuration as the previous restaurant's sign.
The current sign regulations allow the applicant to attach projecting, awning, and wall
type business identification signs to the restaurant's exterior walls. The current sign
regulations also allow the applicant to install signs in the windows of the restaurant. As
observed during a site visit to the subject property and as shown in the attached
photographs, the Alpine Tavern restaurant has limited visibility to pedestrian and
vehicular traffic along Meadow Drive due to the location and configuration of the existing
clubhouse building, the presence of mature trees in front of the building, and the
presence of the separate clubhouse entry structure.
2. The applicant shall not have created the circumstances that have necessitated
the variance request.
Staff believes the proposed variance request is consistent with this criterion since the
location of the Vail Racquet Club development; the configuration of the existing club
house building and restaurant tenant space; the presence of the existing separate
clubhouse entry structure; the presence of existing mature vegetation; the size, shape,
and location of the previous restaurant sign; and the 2003 sign regulation amendments
are circumstances not created by the applicant.
3. The applicant must demonstrate that the granting of the variance will be in
general harmony with the purposes of this title.
Staff believes this variance request is consistent with the specific purposes of the Town's
sign regulations and the purpose of the business identification sign regulations, and
therefore meets this criterion.
Pursuant to Section 11- 1 -2 -B: Specific Purpose, Vail Town Code, purposes of the
Town's sign regulations are:
"1. To describe and enable the fair and consistent enforcement of signs in the
town of Vail.
2. To encourage the establishment of well designed, creative signs that enhance
the unique character of Vail's village atmosphere.
3. To preserve a successful and high quality business environment that is aided
by signs that identify, direct, and inform.
4. To aid in providing for the growth of an orderly, safe, beautiful, and viable
community. "
Pursuant to Section 11 -6 -1, Purpose and Description, Vail Town Code, the purpose of
the Town's business identification signs is as follows:
"Business and building identification signs are meant to identify and inform
through the display of the business and /or building name and any graphic
symbols or language pertinent to the advertised enterprise. "
VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of
the applicant's review of a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business Identification Signs,
Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and Appeals, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a freestanding business identification sign, located at 4695 Meadow Drive (Vail
Racquet Club Clubhouse) /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This
recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this
memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request with a condition, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission pass the following motion:
6
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approves, with conditions, the
request for a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business Identification Signs, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and Appeals, Vail Town
Code, to allow for a freestanding business identification sign, located at 4695
Meadow Drive (Vail Racquet Club Clubhouse) /Unplatted, and setting forth details
in regard thereto. "
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the following conditions:
"1. This sign variance approval allows the Alpine Tavern to erect a 9 sq.ft.
freestanding business identification sign in the landscape planter located
between the Vail Racquet Club clubhouse parking lot and Meadow Drive.
2. This sign variance approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of
Vail design review approval for this proposal. "
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request with conditions, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission makes the following findings:
'Based upon a review of Section Vll of the Staff's June 28, 2010, memorandum
to the Planning and Environmental Commission, the site visit, and the evidence
and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
1. Special circumstances and conditions, unique to the subject site, exist that
apply to the land, buildings, topography, vegetation, and sign structures that
would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question.
2. The applicant did not create the circumstances that have necessitated this
variance request.
3. The applicant has demonstrated that granting of this variance is in general
harmony with the purposes of Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town Code. "
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Applicants' Request
C. Photographs
7
Attachment A
Attachment B
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 1, 2010
TO: Town of Vail
Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Ulrich Peter Haller
William E Stewart
Tana E Stewart
Wendy M. Stewart
The Alpine Tavern
4695 Racquet Club Drive
SUBJECT: Variance Request —Sign Regulations
Dear Sirs:
We are the owners of Alpine Tavern and Wendy's Alpine Coffee shop, located in the Vail Racquet Club.
Our variance request is that a new sign, no larger than 9 square feet (3' x 3', the size of the previously
approved sign) be allowed as a replacement of the previous sign. The existing mounting posts will be
utilized. Also, we wish to replace the small sign at the foot of the stairs to our restaurant. Please see
attached photos.
Our request is based on several factors:
1) Special circumstances exist in that there is no possibility of attaching signs to our building
without environmental damage (removing several large pine trees and large shrubs) or
degrading the appearance of the archway and walkway into the Vail Racquet Club. In addition,
signage on the building is not easily seen from the road.
2) Roadside signage is critical in allowing guests to easily locate us within the Vail Racquet Club.
3) We have not created the special circumstances above and do not wish to degrade the
appearance and beautiful architecture of the club or the surrounding neighborhood.
4) The Alpine Tavern and Wendy's Alpine Coffee shop are highly valuable amenities within the Vail
Racquet Club and are a major addition to the quality of life for members and the East Vail
neighborhood in general. The proposed signs are in harmony with the existing signage of the
Vail Racauet Club and the neighborhood. This sienaee is in harmonv with the intent of the Bien
5) We are new small businesses in Vail, creating new jobs in the community and providing tax
revenues to the Town of Vail. Visible signage at the roadside is critical to our success in
attracting guests to our business.
We ask that you approve the proposed variance request.
Thank you,
Attachment C
O
C
U) O
C O
W ^ `
C: C:
M 0
� U
M
N O
L
> •�
m E
i-a
M
.Q CM
Q •�
_=3 U)
U x
a� O
U X
M
• M W
U
0
S0
MOWN
i
At A
M C: cn
_ L
fn0.2 N t
X _� > C 9
Cu
� a � �
N
-C C
O
U) N t
a-I
O_ 0
�
0—
Co
1
.
. �
i .
i '
T /
� 1
f „
f
4
f
w\
t
G'.
"i
bi"
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: June 28, 2010
SUBJECT: A request for a work session on a major exterior alterations, pursuant to Section
12 -71 -7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the
redevelopment of the area known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), with multiple
mixed -use structures including but not limited to, multiple - family dwelling units,
fractional fee units, accommodation units, employee housing units, office, and
commercial /retail uses, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage
Road West, and the South Frontage Road West rig ht -of- way /Unplatted (a
complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail
Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC080064)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Thomas Miller
Planner: Warren Campbell
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by the Mauriello
Planning Group, LLC, is requesting a work session with the Planning and Environmental
Commission to present the proposed height, bulk, mass, and setbacks of the structures
comprising Ever Vail.
This work session is intended to bring the afore - mentioned topics before the
Commission to continue building an understanding of the above grade structures being
proposed. Staff is continuing to review this information and will be providing input on
bulk and mass at a future hearing with additional expertise provided by the urban design
services of Jeff Winston, of Winston and Associates. At this hearing power point
presentation will be given by both the applicant and Jeff Winston to further aid the
Commission in understanding the intricacies of the bulk, mass, spaces between building,
and interaction between the structures. The presentations will begin to address some of
the comments heard at the May 24, 2010. As this is a work session and the Planning
and Environmental Commission is not being asked to reach any conclusions. This
application is to be tabled to the July 12, 2010, public hearing.
Department of Connnnnity Development
75 Sonth Frontage Road
Tail, CO 81657
PH: 970 -179 -2138
EII: 970 -479- 24-52
11'11'11'. Val lgov. COTn
June 9, 2010
Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission
Joseph Staufer
100 East Meadow Drive, #31
Vail, CO 81657
John Martin
Martin Manley Architects
PO Box 4701
Eagle, CO 81631
Adjacent Property Owners
Re: Report to the Planning and Environmental Commission of an administrative action approving a
request for a minor amendment to SDD No. 6, Village Inn Plaza, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10,
Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for modifications to the approved development
plans to increase site coverage and commercial floor area and reduce the side setback (east side)
to facilitate a new restaurant, located at 68 East Meadow Drive, Unit 602/ Lot O, Block 5D, Vail
Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100031)
Applicant: Joe Staufer, represented by John G. Martin, Architect
Planner: Rachel Friede
Dear PEC members, Mr. Staufer, Mr. Martin, and adjacent property owners:
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that Town of Vail Staff has approved, with conditions, a minor
amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Village Inn Plaza. The applicant is proposing the
following minor amendments to SDD No. 6, Village Inn Plaza, which will occur at Building Two of Phase III:
• Consolidation of three separate commercial spaces into a 3,011 square foot restaurant
• Addition of 48 square feet of site coverage, including 6 square feet for a chimney (new chimney 1) on
the east side the building and 42 square feet to accommodate a mechanical unit (new mech space)
• Addition of 16 square feet of above grade building footprint for chimney (new chimney 2) that does not
increase site coverage due to basement level below
• Conversion of 10 square feet of interior common space to common commercial (new chimney 3)
• Conversion of 26 square feet of existing commercial space to common space for enlarged public
restrooms (addition men's and addition women's)
The proposed restaurant will include six, built -in hibachi tables, a sushi bar, a liquor bar, general table
seating and a large commercial kitchen. A mechanical unit will be housed in what is now Digits Nail
Boutique. The building fagade that currently includes the entrance to Digits (northeast portion of condo
602), which faces the pedestrianway adjacent to Solaris, is proposed to be converted to an entrance to the
restaurant and venting for the mechanical unit within that space. The attached plans, dated June 4, 2010,
highlight changes to the floor plans. Additional plans are on file at the Department of Community
Development. There will be subsequent Design Review applications and approvals required to affect the
request found in this proposal.
Staff finds that approval of this minor amendment request meets the criteria in Section 12 -9A -8, Vail Town
Code. The amendment does not alter the basic intent and character of Special Development District No.
6, Village Inn Plaza. The proposal calls for a slight increase in site coverage and decrease in setback, but
will not alter the character or basic intent of the SDD. The setback reduction will occur eight feet above
grade for a chimney and also with a three foot bumpout of the fagade of what is currently Digits Nail
Boutique. The amendment will continue to be compatible with the neighborhood and other uses. Staff
found that the new restaurant will decrease the parking requirements of the project, thus creating an
excess of one parking space in the project. There is no impact to any landscaping or natural features.
Traffic will not be impacted. There is no change in the total number of condominiums, no addition in the
amount of allowable gross residential floor area, and all exterior changes associated with this proposal
shall receive Design Review Board review and approval and subsequent Building Permit review and
approval for compliance with all standards and requirements.
However, Staff believes the current proposal does not meet the criteria for loading and delivery due to a
lack of a lift that was to be completed as part of a previous major amendment to the Special Development
District. To resolve this concern, Staff is placing a condition on this approval that a Town approved
loading and delivery solution be completed prior to receiving any certificate of occupancy for the restaurant
(including temporary certificate of occupancy). Staff has determined that the current proposal, along with
the condition of approval, meet the design criteria in Section 12 -9A -8, Vail Town Code.
Based upon review of the criteria and findings in Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town
Code, staff finds the above - referenced amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn,
is approved with conditions in accordance with the procedures as identified in Section 12- 9A -10,
Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code. The condition of approval is as follows:
The applicant shall provide $10,000 to be included in an escrowed fund to be applied towards
addressing the loading and delivery needs within Special Development District No. 6, Village
Inn Plaza, prior to requesting a certificate of occupancy. If the money from this fund is not
utilized within five years of receiving the certificate of occupancy the amount of $10,000 shall
be refunded.
Staff's approval of this minor special development district amendment will be reported at a public hearing
before the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission on Monday, June 28, 2010, at 1:00 p.m.
in the Vail Town Council Chambers, located at 75 South Frontage Road. The Planning and Environmental
Commission reserves the right to "call up" this staff decision for additional review at this hearing. Pursuant
to Section 12- 9A -10, Vail Town Code, appeals of staff decisions may be filed by adjacent property owners,
owners of property within the special development district, the applicant, Planning and Environmental
Commission members or members of the Town Council as outlined in Section 12 -3 -3, Appeals, Vail Town
Code.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 970 - 479 -2440.
Sincerely,
Rachel Friede, AICP, LEED AP
Town Planner
Attachment: Approved site plan A1.1 dated 6/2/10
39eiJ 4SAAE 434 ltlA $AI A/V4®Y �1-I
YMI d NNI 3JV IA
IIN
A l N Y ; ,.;,.N I l H VIM _ •••'•••"+r ].f n �{ ] ],.� �} f� �, ti aka
,• .� "'"' iNv Uj I V isiC J oI. m nwrr9 uw
Y1q�M1fl
_
f �
i0
a
�4
m
�6
z
O
F- :
wD 3
Z Saa
a 4
r
z
U
way wti
L
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
June 14, 2010
1:OOpm
T�N�V OVAIL
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Luke Cartin departed at 2:15pm Henry Pratt
Michael Kurz
Sarah Paladino departed at 2:15pm
Bill Pierce
Tyler Schneidman arrived at 1:08pm
David Viele departed at 2:15pm
Special Presentation 15 minutes
Linn Brooks, Assistant General Manager of the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, provided a
brief update on District matters. She also queried the Commission on topics that might be of interest
for future presentations by the District, such as information on the health of Gore Creek and its
watershed, the affects of land use on water supply and water quality, and District projects that
impact stream flows.
Commissioner Pierce inquired about the affects of storm water run -off and parking lot drainage on
the quality of Gore Creek, and asked about opportunities for the Town and the District to address the
issue.
Commissioner Cartin inquired about the proportion of indoor and outdoor water usage.
Commissioner Pierce requested that Staff present a summary of the Town's current storm water
run -off regulations at a future hearing.
Commissioner Kurz requested that Staff also provide information about the health of Gore Creek at
a future hearing.
Site Visits:
No Site Visits
30 minutes
1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments
to Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment,
Vail Town Code, to establish a new zone district, Townhouse and Row House District (TRH)
District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100011)
Applicant: Chris Galvin, represented by K.H. Webb Architects /Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Tabled to July 12, 2010
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6 -0 -0
Bill Gibson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.
Dominic Mauriello, representing the applicant, gave a power point presentation highlighting the
findings from the GRFA analysis they conducted on townhouse projects in the vicinity.
Page 1
Commissioner Pierce stated that he has walk past the townhouse projects several times in the
past weeks, and does not believe there should be incentives for larger townhouses. He noted
that owners are already allowed to make the units larger by constructing "common area" and
garages. He further added that parking should be required to be enclosed. He commented that
street level garage doors may not be attractive, but they would be more attractive than the
existing chains across the townhouse's driveways.
Commissioner Kurz felt the variance process has been cumbersome and created inequities in
the redevelopment of townhouse properties. He believes a common ground is desired and that
a single 1.5 GRFA ratio may be appropriate. He prefers the existing driveway and privacy
chains to street level garage doors. He is concerned that garage doors on these townhouses
would create too much of a suburban character.
Commissioner Paladino asked for clarification about the 1.98 GRFA ratio that would be created if
townhouses were only regulated by height and site coverage.
Commissioner Schneidman inquired if the proposed GRFA ratio would create equality.
Commissioner Cartin noted that the proposed zoning changes would "clean -up" past inequities.
Commissioner Viele reminded the Commission that the goal of the previous SDD application
was to create a simpler alternative to the variance process and to simplify the reconstruction of
townhouse units. He does not believe increasing the allowable GRFA to 1.5 should be the goal
of this new district, but it should be to create a simpler process for constructing what is allowed
today. He believes Unit 11 at the Vail Rowhouse should set the minimum bar for an allowable
GRFA ratio.
John Dunn, representing Dolph and Barbara Bridgewater, Unit 11 Vail Rowhouses, noted
concerns about a statement in the staff memorandum regarding properties not meeting current
real estate standards. He questioned the scope of the zone district and asked if the proposed
district was a large SDD (i.e. special development district) application. He noted concern about
the public notice process for the application. He commented that the applicant has not yet
addressed all the questions posed in the April 26, 2010, staff memorandum. He noted that a
presentation has not yet been given on how other communities regulate townhouses.
Dominic Mauriello stated that they sent letters to 80 individual townhouse owners describing the
proposal and providing their contact information and Staff's contact information. He noted that
he has only received one phone call and Staff has not received any calls from these 80
individuals.
Bill Gibson confirmed that Staff has not be contacted by any townhouse owners other than Mr.
Bridgewater.
30 minutes
2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments
to Section 12 -15 -5, Additional Gross Residential Floor Area (250 Ordinance), Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow applications to be made for
additional GRFA prior to all the allowable GRFA being constructed on a property, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100021)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Recommendation of approval
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
Page 2
Bill Gibson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. He highlighted the 250 Addition
regulations, the impacts of the current regulation on multi - family projects, and how the 2004
changes to GRFA calculation methodology have affected these properties.
There was no public comment.
Commissioner Pierce stated that Staff's presentation explained this complicated issues very well.
Commissioner Cartin inquired about options to make GRFA record keeping simpler.
Commissioner Paladino expressed that the proposed amendments removed barriers for
individual property owners in the spirit of the original 250 Ordinance and she supported the
amendments.
60 minutes
3. A request for a work session on a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the area known
as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), with multiple mixed -use structures including but not limited to,
multiple - family dwelling units, fractional fee units, accommodation units, employee housing units,
office, and commercial /retail uses, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage
Road West, and the South Frontage Road West rig ht -of- way /Unplatted (a complete legal
description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department),
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080064)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Tabled to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Schneidman VOTE: 3 -0 -2 (Cartin and Viele recused)
Commissioner Paladino departed prior to the start of this item.
Dominic Mauriello summarized the comments from the Commission's last public hearing
Michael Lee, Calison Architects, presented the modifications made to the architectural plans in
response to comments from the Commission's last public hearing. The most prominent changes
were made to the bridges associated with the project.
Commissioner Kurz commented on the opportunity for fountains or other landmarks to visually
draw pedestrian to specific areas.
Jeff Winston, Winston Associates, presented a three - dimensional model of the Ever Vail project
reflecting the applicant's recent changes. Jeff Winston provided commentary on the applicant's
individual plan changes, and noted the improvements made to the pedestrian visual experience
due to the applicant's changes in bridge design.
Commissioner Kurz recommended exploring more organic building forms along the Frontage
Road and Red Sandstone Creek.
Jeff Winston commented that the applicant's changes have improved the lighting and solar
access for the public plazas.
Commissioner Kurz recommended exploring archways similar to those used at Arrabelle
Dominic Mauriello stated their excitement about public art opportunities.
Page 3
Commissioner Pierce recommended exploring sidewalks designed in the direction of pedestrian
travel and not designed with right angles.
Dominic Mauriello explained how the applicant considered those sidewalk design options, but
due to the intersection with vehicular traffic certain sidewalks needed to be at right angles.
Jeff Winston commented on the need to further address the relationship and connection between
Ever Vail and the existing areas of Lionshead.
Commissioner Kurz asked about future opportunities to change the roof the water treatment
plant.
Commissioner Pierce liked the applicant's modifications to improve the lighting and visibility of
the transit center.
Jeff Winston commented on the building bulk and mass along the creek, and recommended the
building heights could be stepped even more than proposed.
Dominic Mauriello asked if the Commission would like to review these changes again at the June
28 meeting since Commissioners Paladino and Pratt were not present for this presentation.
Commissioner Pierce stated that reviewing the model again would be beneficial.
5 minutes
4. A request for an amendment to an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12- 61 -11,
Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the
required landscape plan and geologic hazard mitigation plan for the redevelopment of the
easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments; and a request for the review of
a variance, from Section 14 -5 -1, Minimum Standards, Parking Lot and Parking Structure Design
Standards for All Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code,
to allow for a crossover drive aisle width of less than thirty -feet (30') within the required parking
structure, located at 1280 North Frontage Road /Lots 1 -5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing
1,and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100018 /PEC100019)
Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge L.L.C.
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
5. A request for final review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -5, Conditional
Uses: Generally (On All Levels Of A Building Or Outside Of A Building), Vail Town Code, to allow
for the development of a public or private parking lot (parking structure); a vehicle maintenance,
service, repair, storage, and fueling facility; a ski lift and tow (gondola), within "Ever Vail" (West
Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West, and the South
Frontage Road West rig ht -of- way /Unplatted (a complete legal description is available for
inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC080063)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
Page 4
5 minutes
6. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary
amendment, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of
properties from Arterial Business District and unzoned South Frontage Road West right -of -way
which is not zoned to Lionshead Mixed Use -2, properties known as "Ever Vail" (West
Lionshead), located at 953 and 1031 South Frontage Road West and South Frontage Road
West right -of -way, (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail
Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080061)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
7. A request for a final review of a variance from 12- 71 -14, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, to allow for additional site coverage below grade, within
"Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 934 (BP Site), 953 (Vail Professional Building), 1031
(Cascade Crossing) S. Frontage Road / Unplatted; 862 (VR Maintenance Shop) and 923 (Holy
Cross Lot) S. Frontage Road / Tracts A and B, S. Frontage Road Subdivision; 1000 (Glen Lyon
Office Building) S. Frontage Road / Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision (a complete legal description
is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090035)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
8. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a proposed major amendment
to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special
Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the removal of the Glen Lyon Commercial
Site, Development Area D, (Glen Lyon Office Building) from the District for incorporation into the
properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West /Lot
54 Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090036)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
9. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations
amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will
implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC090028)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
10. A request for a work session to discuss prescribed regulations amendments, pursuant to Section
12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090017)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Friede
Page 5
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
11. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new
special development district, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development (SDD) District, Vail
Town Code, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive, Units 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 (Vail Rowhouses) /Lots 7,
8, 9, 10, 12, 13, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC090037)
Applicant: Christopher Galvin, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
12. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10,
Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, for a major amendment to Special Development
District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, to allow for a change in land use, an increase in site coverage and
building footprint, a decrease in the side setback and a deviation from parking requirements to
accommodate a new restaurant, located at 68 East Meadow Drive, Unit 602/ Lot O, Block 5D,
Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100026)
Applicant: Joe Staufer, represented by John G. Martin, Architect
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION: WITHDRAWN
13. Approval of May 10, 2010 minutes
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
14. Approval of May 24, 2010 minutes
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
15. Information Update:
Discussion about electronic Commissioner packets.
16. Adjournment
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Schneidman VOTE: 3 -0 -0 (Cartin, Paladino, Viele absent)
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the
public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-
2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970)
479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published June 11, 2010, in the Vail Daily.
Page 6
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
June 14, 2010
1:OOpm
TOWN OVAIL'�
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT
Luke Cartin departed at 2:15pm
Michael Kurz
Sarah Paladino departed at 2:15pm
Bill Pierce
Tyler Schneidman arrived at 1:08pm
David Viele departed at 2:15pm
MEMBERS ABSENT
Henry Pratt
Special Presentation 15 minutes
Linn Brooks, Assistant General Manager of the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, provided a
brief update on District matters. She also queried the Commission on topics that might be of interest
for future presentations by the District, such as information on the health of Gore Creek and its
watershed, the affects of land use on water supply and water quality, and District projects that
impact stream flows.
Commissioner Pierce inquired about the affects of storm water run -off and parking lot drainage on
the quality of Gore Creek, and asked about opportunities for the Town and the District to address the
issue.
Commissioner Cartin inquired about the proportion of indoor and outdoor water usage.
Commissioner Pierce requested that Staff present a summary of the Town's current storm water
run -off regulations at a future hearing.
Commissioner Kurz requested that Staff also provide information about the health of Gore Creek at
a future hearing.
Site Visits:
No Site Visits
30 minutes
1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments
to Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment,
Vail Town Code, to establish a new zone district, Townhouse and Row House District (TRH)
District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100011)
Applicant: Chris Galvin, represented by K.H. Webb Architects /Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Tabled to July 12, 2010
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6 -0 -0
Bill Gibson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.
Dominic Mauriello, representing the applicant, gave a power point presentation highlighting the
findings from the GRFA analysis they conducted on townhouse projects in the vicinity.
Page 1
Commissioner Pierce stated that he has walk past the townhouse projects several times in the
past weeks, and does not believe there should be incentives for larger townhouses. He noted
that owners are already allowed to make the units larger by constructing "common area" and
garages. He further added that parking should be required to be enclosed. He commented that
street level garage doors may not be attractive, but they would be more attractive than the
existing chains across the townhouse's driveways.
Commissioner Kurz felt the variance process has been cumbersome and created inequities in
the redevelopment of townhouse properties. He believes a common ground is desired and that
a single 1.5 GRFA ratio may be appropriate. He prefers the existing driveway and privacy
chains to street level garage doors. He is concerned that garage doors on these townhouses
would create too much of a suburban character.
Commissioner Paladino asked for clarification about the 1.98 GRFA ratio that would be created if
townhouses were only regulated by height and site coverage.
Commissioner Schneidman inquired if the proposed GRFA ratio would create equality.
Commissioner Cartin noted that the proposed zoning changes would "clean -up" past inequities.
Commissioner Viele reminded the Commission that the goal of the previous SDD application
was to create a simpler alternative to the variance process and to simplify the reconstruction of
townhouse units. He does not believe increasing the allowable GRFA to 1.5 should be the goal
of this new district, but it should be to create a simpler process for constructing what is allowed
today. He believes Unit 11 at the Vail Rowhouse should set the minimum bar for an allowable
GRFA ratio.
John Dunn, representing Dolph and Barbara Bridgewater, Unit 11 Vail Rowhouses, noted
concerns about a statement in the staff memorandum regarding properties not meeting current
real estate standards. He questioned the scope of the zone district and asked if the proposed
district was a large SDD (i.e. special development district) application. He noted concern about
the public notice process for the application. He commented that the applicant has not yet
addressed all the questions posed in the April 26, 2010, staff memorandum. He noted that a
presentation has not yet been given on how other communities regulate townhouses.
Dominic Mauriello stated that they sent letters to 80 individual townhouse owners describing the
proposal and providing their contact information and Staff's contact information. He noted that
he has only received one phone call and Staff has not received any calls from these 80
individuals.
Bill Gibson confirmed that Staff has not be contacted by any townhouse owners other than Mr.
Bridgewater.
30 minutes
2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments
to Section 12 -15 -5, Additional Gross Residential Floor Area (250 Ordinance), Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow applications to be made for
additional GRFA prior to all the allowable GRFA being constructed on a property, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100021)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Recommendation of approval
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
Page 2
Bill Gibson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. He highlighted the 250 Addition
regulations, the impacts of the current regulation on multi - family projects, and how the 2004
changes to GRFA calculation methodology have affected these properties.
There was no public comment.
Commissioner Pierce stated that Staff's presentation explained this complicated issues very well.
Commissioner Cartin inquired about options to make GRFA record keeping simpler.
Commissioner Paladino expressed that the proposed amendments removed barriers for
individual property owners in the spirit of the original 250 Ordinance and she supported the
amendments.
60 minutes
3. A request for a work session on a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the area known
as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), with multiple mixed -use structures including but not limited to,
multiple - family dwelling units, fractional fee units, accommodation units, employee housing units,
office, and commercial /retail uses, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage
Road West, and the South Frontage Road West rig ht -of- way /Unplatted (a complete legal
description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department),
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080064)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Tabled to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Schneidman VOTE: 3 -0 -2 (Cartin and Viele recused)
Commissioner Paladino departed prior to the start of this item.
Dominic Mauriello summarized the comments from the Commission's last public hearing
Michael Lee, Calison Architects, presented the modifications made to the architectural plans in
response to comments from the Commission's last public hearing. The most prominent changes
were made to the bridges associated with the project.
Commissioner Kurz commented on the opportunity for fountains or other landmarks to visually
draw pedestrian to specific areas.
Jeff Winston, Winston Associates, presented a three - dimensional model of the Ever Vail project
reflecting the applicant's recent changes. Jeff Winston provided commentary on the applicant's
individual plan changes, and noted the improvements made to the pedestrian visual experience
due to the applicant's changes in bridge design.
Commissioner Kurz recommended exploring more organic building forms along the Frontage
Road and Red Sandstone Creek.
Jeff Winston commented that the applicant's changes have improved the lighting and solar
access for the public plazas.
Commissioner Kurz recommended exploring archways similar to those used at Arrabelle
Dominic Mauriello stated their excitement about public art opportunities.
Page 3
Commissioner Pierce recommended exploring sidewalks designed in the direction of pedestrian
travel and not designed with right angles.
Dominic Mauriello explained how the applicant considered those sidewalk design options, but
due to the intersection with vehicular traffic certain sidewalks needed to be at right angles.
Jeff Winston commented on the need to further address the relationship and connection between
Ever Vail and the existing areas of Lionshead.
Commissioner Kurz asked about future opportunities to change the roof the water treatment
plant.
Commissioner Pierce liked the applicant's modifications to improve the lighting and visibility of
the transit center.
Jeff Winston commented on the building bulk and mass along the creek, and recommended the
building heights could be stepped even more than proposed.
Dominic Mauriello asked if the Commission would like to review these changes again at the June
28 meeting since Commissioners Paladino and Pratt were not present for this presentation.
Commissioner Pierce stated that reviewing the model again would be beneficial.
5 minutes
4. A request for an amendment to an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12- 61 -11,
Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the
required landscape plan and geologic hazard mitigation plan for the redevelopment of the
easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments; and a request for the review of
a variance, from Section 14 -5 -1, Minimum Standards, Parking Lot and Parking Structure Design
Standards for All Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code,
to allow for a crossover drive aisle width of less than thirty -feet (30') within the required parking
structure, located at 1280 North Frontage Road /Lots 1 -5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing
1,and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100018 /PEC100019)
Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge L.L.C.
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
5. A request for final review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -5, Conditional
Uses: Generally (On All Levels Of A Building Or Outside Of A Building), Vail Town Code, to allow
for the development of a public or private parking lot (parking structure); a vehicle maintenance,
service, repair, storage, and fueling facility; a ski lift and tow (gondola), within "Ever Vail" (West
Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West, and the South
Frontage Road West right -of- way /Unplatted (a complete legal description is available for
inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC080063)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
Page 4
5 minutes
6. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary
amendment, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of
properties from Arterial Business District and unzoned South Frontage Road West right -of -way
which is not zoned to Lionshead Mixed Use -2, properties known as "Ever Vail" (West
Lionshead), located at 953 and 1031 South Frontage Road West and South Frontage Road
West right -of -way, (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail
Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080061)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
7. A request for a final review of a variance from 12- 71 -14, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, to allow for additional site coverage below grade, within
"Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 934 (BP Site), 953 (Vail Professional Building), 1031
(Cascade Crossing) S. Frontage Road / Unplatted; 862 (VR Maintenance Shop) and 923 (Holy
Cross Lot) S. Frontage Road / Tracts A and B, S. Frontage Road Subdivision; 1000 (Glen Lyon
Office Building) S. Frontage Road / Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision (a complete legal description
is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090035)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
8. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a proposed major amendment
to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special
Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the removal of the Glen Lyon Commercial
Site, Development Area D, (Glen Lyon Office Building) from the District for incorporation into the
properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West/Lot
54 Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090036)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to June 28, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
9. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations
amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will
implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC090028)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
10. A request for a work session to discuss prescribed regulations amendments, pursuant to Section
12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090017)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Friede
Page 5
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
11. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new
special development district, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development (SDD) District, Vail
Town Code, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive, Units 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 (Vail Rowhouses) /Lots 7,
8, 9, 10, 12, 13, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC090037)
Applicant: Christopher Galvin, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
12. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10,
Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, for a major amendment to Special Development
District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, to allow for a change in land use, an increase in site coverage and
building footprint, a decrease in the side setback and a deviation from parking requirements to
accommodate a new restaurant, located at 68 East Meadow Drive, Unit 602/ Lot O, Block 5D,
Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100026)
Applicant: Joe Staufer, represented by John G. Martin, Architect
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION: WITHDRAWN
13. Approval of May 10, 2010 minutes
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
14. Approval of May 24, 2010 minutes
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
15. Information Update:
Discussion about electronic Commissioner packets.
16. Adjournment
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Schneidman VOTE: 3 -0 -0 (Carlin, Paladino, Viele absent)
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the
public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-
2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970)
479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published June 11, 2010, in the Vail Daily.
Page 6