Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-0712 PECPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION July 12, 2010 �. 1:OOpm T4WNOFVAnL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visits: No site visits 45 minutes 1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments to Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to establish a new zone district, Townhouse and Row House District (TRH) District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100011) Applicant: Chris Galvin, represented by K.H. Webb Architects /Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 2. A request for a work session on a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the area known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), with multiple mixed -use structures including but not limited to, multiple - family dwelling units, fractional fee units, accommodation units, employee housing units, office, and commercial /retail uses, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West, and the South Frontage Road West rig ht-of-way/U nplatted (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080064) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to July 26, 2010 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 3. A request for an amendment to an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12- 61 -11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the required landscape plan and geologic hazard mitigation plan for the redevelopment of the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments; and a request for the review of a variance, from Section 14 -5 -1, Minimum Standards, Parking Lot and Parking Structure Design Standards for All Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a crossover drive aisle width of less than thirty -feet (30') within the required parking structure, located at 1280 North Frontage Road /Lots 1 -5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing 1,and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100018 /PEC100019) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge L.L.C. Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Table to July 26, 2010 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 4. A request for final review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -5, Conditional Uses: Generally (On All Levels Of A Building Or Outside Of A Building), Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a public or private parking lot (parking structure); a vehicle maintenance, service, repair, storage, and fueling facility; a ski lift and tow (gondola), within "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West, and the South Page 1 Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Table to July 26, 2010 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 5. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of properties from Arterial Business District and unzoned South Frontage Road West right -of -way which is not zoned to Lionshead Mixed Use -2, properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 953 and 1031 South Frontage Road West and South Frontage Road West right -of -way, (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080061) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Table to July 26, 2010 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 6. A request for a final review of a variance from 12- 71 -14, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, to allow for additional site coverage below grade, within "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 934 (BP Site), 953 (Vail Professional Building), 1031 (Cascade Crossing) S. Frontage Road / Unplatted; 862 (VR Maintenance Shop) and 923 (Holy Cross Lot) S. Frontage Road / Tracts A and B, S. Frontage Road Subdivision; 1000 (Glen Lyon Office Building) S. Frontage Road / Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090035) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Table to July 26, 2010 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 7. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the removal of the Glen Lyon Commercial Site, Development Area D, (Glen Lyon Office Building) from the District for incorporation into the properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West/Lot 54 Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090036) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Table to July 26, 2010 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 8. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090028) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Table to July 26, 2010 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Page 2 5 minutes 9. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of a new special development district, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development (SDD) District, Vail Town Code, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive, Units 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 (Vail Rowhouses) /Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090037) Applicant: Christopher Galvin, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Table to July 26, 2010 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 10. A request for a work session to discuss prescribed regulations amendments, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090017) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Withdrawn 5 minutes 11. A request for the review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to create Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch, from Part of Lot 9, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision (Red Sandstone Parking Lot), located at 715 North Frontage Road West/Lot 9, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100027) Applicant: Robert & Diane Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Withdrawn 5 minutes 12. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for a zone district boundary amendment to rezone Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision, (formerly Part of Lot 9, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision) from Medium Density Multiple Family (MDMF) District to the Housing (H) District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100028) Applicant: Robert & Diane Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Withdrawn 13. Approval of June 28, 2010 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 14. Information Update 15. Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Page 3 Community Development Department Published July 9, 2010, in the Vail Daily. Page 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 12, 2010 SUBJECT: A request for a work session on prescribed regulation amendments to Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to establish a new zone district, Townhouse and Row House District (TRH) District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100011) Applicant: Chris Galvin, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Bill Gibson SUMMARY The applicant, Chris Galvin, represented by the Mauriello Planning Group, is requesting a work session to discuss amendments to Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code, to establish a new Vail Village Townhouse (WT) District. While there is currently no application to apply this proposed zone district to any specific property, the applicant believes that in the future, this new zone district could be applied to the existing Vail Row Houses, Texas Townhomes, Vail Trails East, and the Vail Trails townhouse developments. Each of these properties is currently zoned High Density Multiple - Family (HDMF) District and share similar existing legally non - conforming zoning issues. At this time, the applicant is requesting a work session to discuss several development standards associated with the proposed zone district, including permitted, conditional, and accessory uses, lot area and site dimensions, setbacks, building height, site coverage, landscaping, and parking. The applicant's revised request dated July 6, 2010 has been attached for review (Attachment A) and the Town's current High Density Multiple - Family (HDMF) District zoning standards have been attached for reference (Attachment B). As this is a request for a work session, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission provides comments and direction to the applicant on the proposed text amendments and then tables this item to its July 26, 2010 public hearing for further deliberation. II. DISCUSSION ITEMS Name of the Proposed New Zone District. The applicant is proposing to change the name of the proposed new zone district from the Townhouse and Row House (TRH) District to the Vail Village Townhouse (VVT) District. The purpose of changing the district name to "Vail Village" is to further clarify the intent of this new zone district and to help limit the scope of its future application to the discussed Vail Row Houses, Texas Townhomes, Vail Trails East, and the Vail Trails properties. By its name, this district is not intended to be applied to townhouse developments in other Vail neighborhoods. Staff recommends this intent be further clarified in the proposed Section 12 -6J -1, Purpose. Permitted. Conditional. and Accessory Uses The applicant is proposing that many of the land uses allowed in the HDMF District also be allowed in the new townhouse district. The applicant is not proposing to allow lodges, dog kennels, funiculars, private clubs, public parking, religious institutions, or ski lifts in this new townhouse district. Staff generally supports the applicant's approach of allowing similar uses in the new townhouse district as are allowed in the HDMF District. Does the Commission believe other uses should be included or excluded from the proposed new zone district? Lot Area and Site Dimensions The proposed minimum lot size requirements of the new townhouse district distinguish between those townhouse units considered to be part of a larger, collective development site and those townhouse units considered individual lots /development sites. The applicant has proposed a minimum area of 10,000 sq. ft. for lots containing multiple units and 2,000 sq. ft. for those lots individually subdivided. As currently proposed, the minimum lot size standards of the new townhouse district are based upon site area rather than "buildable area" as in the HDMF District. "Buildable area" is that portion of a lot not located in a floodplain, red avalanche hazard, or on slopes greater than 40 %. Minor differences exist between site area and buildable area for the Texas Townhomes, Vail Trails East, and the Vail Trails due to the presence of the Gore Creek floodplain on portions of those properties. Does the Commission believe the density standards of a new townhouse zone district should be based upon total lot area or "buildable area" consistent with the other multiple - family residential zone districts in the Town of Vail? Different from the HDMF District, the applicant is not proposing a minimum street frontage standard for lots in the new townhouse district. Does the Commission believe a new townhouse zone district should include a minimum street frontage requirement? Setbacks The applicant is proposing to maintain the existing 20 foot setback requirements of the HDMF District around the perimeter of townhouse developments, but eliminates any setback requirements between individual townhouse units. Staff believes a zero setback policy between units is necessary for the successful implementation of a townhouse zone district. The applicant is also proposing that the perimeter setbacks also be "as currently exists as of the date the subject property is rezoned to this district ". Staff is concerned that establishing an existing condition, occurring on a specific date, as the required setback 2 will complicate the development review process, create inequities between similarly zoned properties, and not achieve the built environment desired by the Town's zoning regulations and master plans. Similar to certain zone districts, such as the Public Accommodation District, the applicant is proposing to grant the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board the authority to approve deviations to the setback standards based upon a list of criteria, rather than only approving such deviations through the more stringent variance application process outlined in Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code. Does the Planning and Environmental Commission believe allowing deviations to the setback standards without a variance is necessary for the successful implementation of a new townhouse zone district? Building Height The applicant is proposing to continue the 45 foot flat roof and 48 foot sloping roof building heights limits of the HDMF District in the new townhouse district. The applicant is proposing that the initial eave height for units being "substantially redeveloped" should be regulated by the Vail Village Master Plan. Staff agrees with the applicant's intent of minimizing the perceived bulk and mass of townhouse structures from the street. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission supports this policy, Staff believes the Vail Village Master Plan must be updated to quantify the appropriate eave heights for those specific properties being discusses during the review of this text amendment application. Density Control Similar to the HDMF District, the applicant is proposing that the density in the new townhouse zone district not to exceed 25 dwelling units per acre. However, in the HDMF District, the allowable density is based upon acres of "buildable area" rather than total lot area. As discussed above, minor differences exist between the site area and buildable area of the Texas Townhomes, Vail Trails East, and the Vail Trails due to the presence of 100 -year floodplain on portions of those properties. Does the Commission believe the density standards of a new townhouse zone district should be based upon total lot area or "buildable area" consistent with the other multiple - family residential zone districts in the Town of Vail? The applicant is also proposing the allowable density be "as currently exists as of the date the subject property was rezoned to this district ". Again, Staff is concerned that establishing an existing condition, occurring on a specific date, as the allowable density standard will complicate the development review process, create inequities between similarly zoned properties, and not achieve the built environment desired by the Town's zoning regulations and master plans. Gross Residential Floor Area The Planning and Environmental Commission held a work session at its June 14, 2010, public hearing to discuss gross residential floor area (GRFA) in the proposed townhouse zone district. Based upon comments from the Commission at that hearing, the applicant is proceeding with their request to allow 150 square feet. of GRFA for each 100 square feet of total site area (1.5 GRFA ratio). Again, in the HDMF District, the allowable GRFA is based upon the "buildable area" rather than total lot area. As discussed above, minor differences exist between the site area and buildable area of the Texas Townhomes, Vail Trails East, and the Vail Trails due to the presence of the 100 -year floodplain on portions of those properties. Does the Commission believe the GRFA standards of a new townhouse zone district should be based upon total lot area or "buildable area" consistent with the other multiple - family residential zone districts in the Town of Vail? Does the Commission believe the proposed 1.5 GRFA ratio is appropriate in a new townhouse zone district? The applicant is proposing to prohibit units in the townhouse zone district from utilizing the "250 Ordinance" or the "Interior Conversion" additional GRFA provisions of the Vail Town Code. Staff believes this policy will simplify the development review process and eliminate the lost development rights associated with the demo /rebuild of an existing townhouse unit that has previously constructed additions utilizing the 250 Ordinance or Interior Conversion provisions. Staff believes this policy of excluding townhouse units from utilizing the 250 Ordinance and the Interior Conversion provision, and instead adjusting the allowable GRFA formulas to prevent a loss of development rights, creates equity among property owners in the same zone district. Site Coverage Similar to the HDMF District, the applicant is proposing that site coverage not exceed 55% of the total site area. The HDMF District also regulates site coverage based upon total site area and not buildable area. The applicant is proposing that the allowable site coverage also be "as currently exists as of the date the subject property was rezoned to this district ". Again, Staff is concerned that establishing an existing condition, occurring on a specific date, as the allowable site coverage will complicate the development review process, create inequities between similarly zoned properties, and not achieve the built environment desired by the Town's zoning regulations and master plans. Landscaping The applicant is proposing that a minimum of 20% of the total site area be landscaped in the new townhouse district. This proposal is less restrictive than the 30% landscaping standard of the HDMF District. The applicant is proposing 20% landscaping based upon the existing conditions at the Vail Row Houses, Texas Townhomes, Vail Trails East, and the Vail Trails townhouse developments. Similar to the Commercial Core 1 (CC1) District, the applicant is proposing a no net loss of landscaping policy for those properties that will be legally non - conforming in regard to the proposed 20% landscape area requirement. Parking Similar to most other zone districts in the Town of Vail, the proposed parking requirements for the townhouse district are in accordance with Chapter 12 -10, Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code. The proposal deviates from the HDMF District because it does not include a requirement prohibiting parking in the front setback and does not include a requirement that at least 75% of the parking be located within a building. 4 Contrary to the recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan, the proposed townhouse district also does not require parking to be enclosed as part of a redevelopment project. Instead, the proposed townhouse district allows existing surface parking located within the front setback and the street right -of -way to continue. Does the Planning and Environmental Commission believe the existing surface parking conditions at the Vail Row Houses, Texas Townhomes, Vail Trails East, and the Vail Trails townhouse developments are appropriate in a new townhouse zone district; or does the Commission believe future parking should be enclosed and not be located within a front setback or street right -of -way? Vail Village Master Plan Staff recommends that amendments to the Vail Village Master Plan be considered concurrently with this application to establish a new zone district. Staff believes the Vail Village Master Plan should be amended to include recommendations for which properties should be included in a townhouse zone district. Staff also believes the specific redevelopment recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan should be coordinated with any implementation of a new townhouse zone district. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As this is a request for a work session, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission provides comments and direction to the applicant on the proposed text amendments and then tables this item to its July 26, 2010, public hearing for further deliberation. IV. ATTACHMENTS A. Applicant's revised request dated July 6, 2010 B. Article 12 -6H, High Density Multiple - Family (HDMF) District, Vail Town Code Text Amendment to the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations, Creating a New "Vail Village Townhouse" District Planning and Environmental Commission Submitted March 15, 2010 Revised April 15, 2010 Revised Judy 6, 2010 J � I ilcl Mauriello Planning Group !10 WEST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE NL SPA CON900IMIPUMS.U1111 A PAIL COLORADO 01657 I. Introduction to the Zoning Code Amendment The intent of this text amendment to the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations is to correct a long standing problematic application of High Density Multiple Family Zoning to townhouse projects within the Vail Village and correct an equity issue created by the "250 Ordinance." The proposal will create a new townhouse zoning that can be applied to townhouse properties in the Vail Village area, proposed as the "Vail Village Townhouse" District (VV'I) and outlined in Section III of this submittal. There are several townhouse projects within the Vail Village area which were originally platted as townhouse parcels under Eagle County jurisdiction before there was zoning in Eagle County and before the Town was incorporated in 1966. Zoning was not adopted in the Town of Vail until 1969 (Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1969). These properties were then zoned High Density Multiple Family (HDMF). Under the 1969 zoning code, there was only a front setback requirement and no side setback requirements, there was no building height limitation and the GRFA limitation (then termed Floor Area Ratio — FAR) was 1.5 to 1, meaning that 150 sq. ft. of GRFA was allowed for each 100 sq. ft. of total land area instead of the 0.76 to 1 ratio that exists today. (a) Floor Area No minimum; (b) Lot Area: No minimum; (c) Setback: Front - 15 feet. (2) Floor Area Ratio: The floor area ratio shall not exceed 1. 50:1. (3) Off - street Parking Off - street parking shall be provided in accordance with requirements set forth in the Supplementary regulations. (4) Off - street Loading. Off - street loading shall be provided in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Supplementary regulations. Now, 46 years later, the zoning on these properties is more restrictive and does not appropriately recognize traditional townhouse development, which is described as a series of attached homes with zero lot lines between the units. Unlike a condominium development, town houses traditionally sit on fee simple parcels of land. Under current HDMF zoning, these types of lots are not in compliance with many of the HDMF zoning provisions. In order to address both the fee - simple lot format and the condominium format of town houses found in Vail Village, the proposed district will accommodate both ownership formats. As a result, the applicant is proposing a new zone district, referred to as "Vail Village Townhouse" District (VV I). The VVT zone district will allow for redevelopment of individual units within a townhouse or row house configuration, without the need for numerous variances but with review by the Town of Vail to ensure compliance with the regulations. Examples of townhouse and row house development in Vail Village: Nev Zone District.• Vail Village Townhouse District 2 Texas To-,nhomes Vail Trails Chalets II. Proposed Text Amendment The purpose behind this proposal is to streamline the redevelopment process and avoid the need for multiple variances for even the smallest of development projects. In addition, it is intended to recognize and restore the historical development rights of townhouse projects while recognizing the importance of maintaining their existing character. Under the new district, "250s" would be eliminated by allowing the GRFA at a level that creates equal treatment of similar properties and allows individual town house units to demolished without the penalties inherent with the application of the 250 Ordinance. HDMF was used as the basis for the new zone district, with changes to allow for townhouse development. The following is the proposed new zone district, along with a description of why the modifications are necessary to facilitate townhouse redevelopment: ARTICLE J. VAIL VILLAGE TOWNHOUSE (VVT) DISTRICT 12 -6J -1: PURPOSE: The Vail Village Townhouse district is intended to provide sites and maintain the unique character of existing townhouse and row house development in the Town of Vail. The Vail Village Townhouse district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities commensurate with attached or row dwellings, and to maintain the desirable residential and resort qualities of the zone district by establishing appropriate site development standards. Certain nonresidential uses are permitted as conditional uses, which relate to the nature of Vail as a winter and summer recreation and vacation community and, where permitted, are intended to blend harmoniously with the residential character of the zone district. 12 -6J -2: PERMITTED USES: The following uses shall be permitted in the VVT district: Employee housing units, as further regulated by chapter 13 of this title. Multiple - family residential dwellings, including to townhouses or attached row dwellings. 12 -6J -3: CONDITIONAL USES: The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the VVT district, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title: Bed and breakfasts, as further regulated by section 12 -14 -18 of this title. Communications antennas and appurtenant equipment. Home child daycare facilities, as further regulated by section 12 -14 -12 of this title. Private unstructured parking Public and private schools. Public buildings, grounds and facilities. Public park and recreation facilities. Public utility and public service uses. Timeshare units. Nev Zone District.• Vail Village Townhouse District 12 -6J -4: ACCESSORY USES: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the VVT district: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of section 12 -14 -12 of this title. Private greenhouses, tool sheds, playhouses, attached garages or carports, swimming pools, or recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential and lodge uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 12 -6J -5: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet of site area for lots containing three or more dwelling units or for properties developed in a condominium format. For individually platted townhouse lots, the minimum lot or site area shall be two thousand (2,000) square feet of site area. 12 -6J -6: SETBACKS: The minim setback shall be twenty feet from the perimeter of the zone district or as currently exists as of the date the subject property is rezoned to this district. There shall be no setback from property lines which exist between attached units. At the discretion of the planning and environmental commission and /or the design review board, variations to the setback standards outlined above may be approved during the review of exterior alterations or modifications subject to the applicant demonstrating compliance with the following criteria: A. Proposed building setbacks provide necessary separation between buildings and riparian areas, geologically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. B. Proposed building setbacks comply with applicable elements of the Vail Village urban design guide plan and design considerations or other applicable design guidelines. C. Proposed building setbacks will provide adequate availability of light, air and open space. D. Proposed building setbacks will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. E. Proposed building setbacks will result in creative design solutions or other public benefits that could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. 12 -6J -7: HEIGHT: For a flat roof or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed forty five feet (45�. For a sloping roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed forty eight feet (48�. For units being substantially redeveloped, the initial eave height along a public street shall be as regulated by the Vail Village Master Plan. 12 -6J -8: DENSITY CONTROL: Total density shall not exceed twenty -five dwelling units per acre of total site area or as currently exists as of the date the subject property was rezoned to this district. A dwelling unit in a multiple - family or townhouse building may include one attached accommodation unit no larger than one -third (1/3) of the total floor area of the dwelling. Nev Zone District.• Vail Village Townhouse District 4 12 -6J -9: GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA: Not more than one hundred fifty (150) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted for each one hundred (100) square feet of total site area. Existing attached or row dwellings in this zone district shall not be entitled to additional gross residential floor area under section 12 -15 -5: Additional Gross Residential Floor Area (250 Ordinance), or section 12 -15 -4: Interior Conversions of this title. 12- 6J -10: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed fifty five (55 %) or the total site area, or as currently exists as of the date the subject property was rezoned to this district. 12- 6J -11: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT: At least twenty percent (20 %) of the total site area shall be landscaped. There shall be no net loss of landscape area for sites which do not meet the twenty percent (20 %) requirement. 12- 6J -12: PARKING AND LOADING: Off street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this title. Required parking currently located in the front setback area and /or within the right -of -way may continue, provided that the public safety is maintained and subject to a revokable right -of -way permit issued by the Town. III. Review Criteria for a Text Amendment The Town of Vail Zoning Regulations provide the criteria for review of a text amendment. For the purposes of this application, each criterion will be addressed below: 1. The extent to which the text amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the zoning regulations; and Our Anal The Town of Vail Zoning Regulations, in Section 12 -1 -2: Purpose, describes the general purpose of the regulations as follows: 12 -1 -2: PURPOSE: A. General These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town, and to promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. Section 12 -1 -2 also provides the specific purposes of the regulations as follows: 1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. 2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other dangerous conditions. 3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets. 4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off streetparking and loading facilities. 5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic values. 6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationshp among land uses, consistent with municipal development objectives. 7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures. New Zone District.• Vail Village Townhouse District S. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the town. 9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, wood, hillsides, and other desirable natural features. 10. To assure adequate open pace, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters. 11. To othenvise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. The proposed text amendment also furthers the purpose statements of the Vail Zoning Regulations. Each of the purpose statements is clearly enhanced by the proposed amendment. 2. The extent to which the text amendment would better implement and better achieve the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town; and Our Analysis: The goals contained in several of the Town's comprehensive, guiding documents are applicable during the review process for the text amendment. The applicable plan sections below are identified as relevant to the review of this proposal. Vail Land Use Plan (in part) 1.0 General Growth /Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additionalgrowth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 4.0 Village Core / Lionshead 4.2 Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing character of each area is preserved thorough implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan. 4.3 The ambiance of Vail Village is important to the identity of Vail and should be preserved. (scale, a pine character, small town feeling mountains, natural setting intimate side, cosmopolitan feeling, environmental quality.) 5.0 Residential 5.1 Additional residentialgrowth should continue to occurprimarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high ha .Zard do not exist. 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail with appropriate restrictions. 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the marketplace demands for a full range of housing types. 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing need should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. Vail Village Master Plan (in part) The Vail Row Houses is located within the "Vail Village Master Plan" land use category. The following stated goals of the Vail Village Master Plan are applicable to this application: Goal # 1: Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. Objective 1.3: Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements done by private developers working in cooperation with the Town. Nev Zone District.• Vail Village Townhouse District Policy 1.3.1: Public improvements shall be developed with the working participation of the private sector working with the Town. Goal #3: To recogni .Ze as a top priority the enhancement of the walking experience throughout the Village EAST GORE CREEK SUBAREA ( #6) 6 ■._ �1 . f N. a I +, u ° 4 ,6 r P T F. IEEE( A number of the earliest projects developed in Vail are located in the East Gore Creek Sub Area. Development in this area is exclusively multi family condominium projects with a very limited amount of support commercial. Surface parking is found at each site, which creates a very dominant visual impression of the sub -area. Wlhile the level of development in East Gore Creek ' generally greater than that allowed under existing honing, this area has the potential to absorb density without compromising the character of the Village. This development could be accommodated by partial infill of existing parking areas balanced by greens ace additions or through increasing the height of existing buildings (generally one story over existing heights). In order to maintain the architectural continuity of projects, additional density should be considered only in conjunction with the comprehensive redevelopment of projects. Clearly, one of the main objectives to consider in the redevelopment of any property should be to improve existing parking facilities. This includes satisfying parking demands for existing and additional development; as well as design considerations relative to redevelopment proposals. The opportunity to introduce below grade structured parking will greatly improve pedestrianisation and landscape features in this area. This should be considered a goal of any redevelopment proposal in this sub -area. Development or redevelopment of this sub -area will attract additional traffic and population into this area and may have signcant impacts upon portions of Sub Areas 7 and 10. " 3. The extent to which the text amendment demonstrates how conditions have substantially changed since the adoption of the subject regulation and how the existing regulation is no longer appropriate or is inapplicable; and Our Analysis: In 1969, when the Town of Vail zoned many of these townhouse and row house projects HDMF, they generally complied with zoning. There was no minimum lot size, there was only a front setback of 15 ft. and the floor area ratio was 1.5:1. (see below) Nev Zone District.• Vail Village Townhouse District 7 (a) Floor Area No minimum; (b) Lot Area: No minimum; (c) Setback: Front - 15 feet. (2) Floor Area Ratio: The floor area ratio shall not exceed 1. 50:1. (3) Off - street Parking Off - street parking shall. be provided in accordance with requirements set forth in the Supplementary regulations. (4) Off - street Loading. Off - street loading shall be provided in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Supplementary regulations. However, since that time, amendment to the HDMF zone district have rendered these properties nonconforming with regards to almost every development standard of the district, including but not limited to: • Density • Lot Size • Street Frontage • Setbacks • Landscape Area • Parking • Parking Location (front setback and right -of -way) These amendments have made redevelopment of individual units reliant on the variance process, rather than providing a clear road map for redevelopment. As a result, HDMF is no longer appropriate for these properties. 4. The extent to which the text amendment provides a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land use regulations consistent with municipal development objectives; and Our Analysis: The new WT zone district maintains the uses that are permitted, conditional, and accessory uses within the HDMF zone district. Many uses have been eliminated from this zone district that are not applicable, but none have been added, ensuring that this text amendment is a harmonious, convenient, and workable relationship among land use regulations. The new zone district will eliminate the inequities created by the the HDMF district as applicable to townhouse development and the inequities created by the 250 Ordinance. 5. Such other factors and criteria the planning and environmental commission and /or council deem applicable to the proposed text amendment. Our Anal Not applicable. Nev Zone District.• Vail Village Townhouse District 8 ATTACHMENT B ARTICLE 12 -611. HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE - FAMILY (HDMF) DISTRICT 12 -611-1: PURPOSE: The high density multiple - family district is intended to provide sites for multiple - family dwellings at densities to a maximum of twenty five (25) dwelling units per acre, together with such public and semipublic facilities and lodges, private recreation facilities and related visitor oriented uses as may appropriately be located in the same zone district. The high density multiple - family district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities commensurate with high density apartment, condominium and lodge uses, and to maintain the desirable residential and resort qualities of the zone district by establishing appropriate site development standards. Certain nonresidential uses are permitted as conditional uses, which relate to the nature of Vail as a winter and summer recreation and vacation community and, where permitted, are intended to blend harmoniously with the residential character of the zone district. 12 -611-2: PERMITTED USES: The following uses shall be permitted in the HDMF district: Employee housing units, as further regulated by chapter 13 of this title. Lodges, including accessory eating, drinking, recreational or retail establishments, located within the principal use and not occupying more than ten percent (10 %) of the total gross residential floor area (GRFA) of the main structure or structures on the site; additional accessory dining areas may be located on an outdoor deck, porch, or terrace. Multiple - family residential dwellings, including attached or row dwellings and condominium dwellings. 12 -611-3: CONDITIONAL USES: The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the HDMF district, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title: Bed and breakfasts, as further regulated by section 12 -14 -18 of this title. Communications antennas and appurtenant equipment. Dog kennels. Funiculars and other similar conveyances. Home child daycare facilities, as further regulated by section 12 -14 -12 of this title. Private clubs and civic, cultural and fraternal organizations. Private parking structures. Private unstructured parking. Public and private schools. Public buildings, grounds and facilities. Public park and recreation facilities. Public parking structures. Public transportation terminals. Public unstructured parking. Public utility and public service uses. Religious institutions. Ski lifts and tows. Timeshare units. 12 -611-4: ACCESSORY USES: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the HDMF district: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of section 12 -14 -12 of this title. Private greenhouses, toolsheds, playhouses, attached garages or carports, swimming pools, or recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential and lodge uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 12 -611-5: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet of buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area eighty feet (80') on each side within its boundaries. 12 -611-6: SETBACKS: The minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20'), the minimum side setback shall be twenty feet (20'), and the minimum rear setback shall be twenty feet (20'). 12 -611-7: HEIGHT: For a flat roof or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed forty five feet (45'). For a sloping roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed forty eight feet (48'). 12 -611-8: DENSITY CONTROL: Not more than seventy six (76) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted for each one hundred (100) square feet of buildable site area. Total density shall not exceed twenty five (25) dwelling units per acre of buildable site area. Each accommodation unit shall be counted as one - half (1 /2) of a dwelling unit for purposes of calculating allowable units per acre. A dwelling unit in a multiple - family building may include one attached accommodation unit no larger than one -third ( of the total floor area of the dwelling_ 12 -611-9: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed fifty five percent (55 %) of the total site area. 12- 611-10: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT: At least thirty percent (30 %) of the total site area shall be landscaped. The minimum width and length of any area qualifying as landscaping shall be fifteen feet (15') with a minimum area not less than three hundred (300) square feet. 12- 611-11: PARKING AND LOADING: Off street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this title. At least seventy five percent (75 %) of the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view or shall be completely hidden from public view from adjoining properties within a landscaped berm. No parking shall be located in any required front setback area. TOWN 0 VAIN MEMBERS PRESENT Luke Cartin Michael Kurz Henry Pratt Tyler Schneidman David Viele Site Visits: 1. Solaris - 143 East Meadow Drive MEMBERS ABSENT Bill Pierce Sarah Paladino 30 minutes 1. A request for the review of a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business Identification Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and Appeals, Vail Town Code, to allow for business identification signs larger than 6 sq. ft. in area, located at 141 East Meadow Drive (Solaris) /Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100029) Applicant: Peter Knobel, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Denied MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Scheidman VOTE: 4 -1 -0 ( Viele opposed) Warren Campbell presented an overview of the Staff memorandum. He introduced to the record an email from Jack Ryan, a property owner in Vail, stating his support for the application. Dominic Mauriello, Mauriello Planning Group, the applicant's representative, presented a summary of the application and discussed their responses to the criteria for the variance request. He noted that they would be amenable to reducing the area of the lettering /text of the signs if the signs were allowed to be a total of 12 sq.ft. sign area. Commissioner Kurz asked if the signs would be back -lit. He noted that the sign code was recently revised to address the movie theater and bowling alley, and that the Staff memorandum had good logic to not support this request. Commissioner Schneidman agreed with Commissioner Kurz's comments. He noted that every building is a special circumstance which did not equate always to a unique circumstance and that the pedestrian access is not different than other projects. The Village is pedestrian in nature and a sign variance was not warranted. Commissioner Pratt noted that the 6 square foot sign was very visible during the site visit and that the 12 square foot sign appeared too large. He noted that pedestrians will be walking through the project and not just viewing it from a distance. He supports the creativity facilitated by not calculating brackets against sign size. Commissioner Cartin agreed with Commissioner Pratt's comments about sign brackets. He noted that the plaza draws pedestrians to the building and the 6 square foot sign is visible and appropriate. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION June 28, 2010 1:OOpm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 Page 1 Commissioner Viele supported the applicant's request and felt that 6 square feet is too small. There was no public comment. Dominic Mauriello suggested that they would accept 6 square foot signs if a decorative bracket did not count as signage. Warren Campbell noted that Staff and the applicant have disagreed on what constitutes a "bracket" versus a "graphic" for calculating sign area. Commissioner Kurz recommended that the Design Review Board review specific proposed brackets to determine if it is signage or simply a supporting structure. Dominic Mauriello disagreed with Staff's interpretation of what is a bracket and what is a graphic. Commissioner Schneidman noted that the applicant stated that the design of the building doesn't facilitate awnings, which is a self created issue. Peter Nobel stated that he will install awnings at every space on the building and attribute it to Commissioner Schneidman. He then questioned what Commissioner Schneidman does for a living. Commissioner Schneidman stated that Mr. Nobel was misquoting his comments. He did not believe awnings should be installed on Solaris, instead he noted that the applicant's choices in building design were a self created hardship in terms of awnings. Commissioner Kurz voiced his disagreement with the applicant's threats to alter the architectural integrity of the building by installing numerous awnings. He noted concern about the tone of the applicant's comments. Dominic Mauriello stated that the Commission did not appear to support this variance request, so asked that as part of any motion the Commission give direction to the Design Review Board concerning the difference between sign brackets and sign graphics. 30 minutes 2. A request for the review of a variance from Section 11- 6 -3 -A, Business Identification Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances and Appeals, Vail Town Code, to allow for a freestanding business identification sign, located at 4695 Meadow Drive (Vail Racquet Club Clubhouse) /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100030) Applicant: Alpine Tavern Inc., represented by Bill Stewart Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 5 -0 -0 CONDITIONS: 1. This sign variance approval allows the Alpine Tavern to erect a 9 square foot freestanding business identification sign in the landscape planter located between the Vail Racquet Club clubhouse parking lot and Meadow Drive. 2. This sign variance approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail design review approval for this proposal. Bill Gibson presented an overview of the Staff memorandum. Page 2 Bill Stewart, Alpine Tavern, gave a presentation on why he believed a sign variance should be granted. He is requesting to install a sign the same size and in the same location as the previous restaurant. He does not wish to disrupt the architectural character of the Racquet Club by removing trees or removing the entry archway to gain better visibility for the restaurant. He believes the variance request is in harmony with the overall design of the Racquet Club and that the request furthers the goals of the sign code. There was no public comment. Commissioner Cartin noted his support for the request based upon the unique characteristics of the property and location of the business. Commissioner Pratt stated that this situation is unique as the neighborhood is vehicular oriented and that this request differs from the Solaris request. Commissioner Schneidman stated that this request addressed different circumstances than the Solaris request and he noted his support for this variance. Commissioner Kurz agreed with the other Commissioner's comments and welcomed Mr. Stewart to the East Vail neighborhood. Commissioner Viele had no comment 30 minutes 3. A request for a work session on a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the area known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), with multiple mixed -use structures including but not limited to, multiple - family dwelling units, fractional fee units, accommodation units, employee housing units, office, and commercial /retail uses, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West, and the South Frontage Road West rig ht-of-way/U nplatted (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080064) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to July 12, 2010 MOTION: Pratt SECOND: Schneidman VOTE: 3 -0 -2 ( Cartin and Viele recused) Warren Campbell gave an introduction to the topics to be discussed and the goals for the day Steve Harmon and Dominic Mauriello gave a presentation per a power point depicting before and after comments from previous hearings. Commissioner Pratt expressed several thoughts regarding the improvements created by the removal of the above grade connecting bridges, the pedestrian crosswalk. He suggested maybe placing commercial in the at -grade spaces along Forrest Road across from the Ritz - Carlton. He suggested placing a piece of art at the intersection of Market Street and the street connection to Forrest Road which would draw pedestrians into Ever Vail from the corner at the Ritz - Carlton. He felt the removal of the above grade connecting bridges helped with address the recommendation for north -south orientation of structure. He suggested providing space in the pedestrian areas in front of retail to allow for exterior display of merchandise and rental materials. The breaks in the structures adjacent to the Gore Creek on the west side of Red Page 3 Sandstone Creek should be viewed as opportunities to bring light into the west side of the project. Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowners, asked if the digital model presentation could be made available in the Community Development office for people to navigate through and develop comments. He further added that the connecting bridges along the frontage road may be appropriate to help block sound waves into Ever Vail. An acoustic study should be completed to see if the connecting bridges would have any benefits. He supported Jeff Winston's comment regarding more variation in the roof heights. 5 minutes 4. Report to the Planning and Environmental Commission of an administrative action approving a request for a minor amendment to SDD No. 6, Village Inn Plaza, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for modifications to the approved development plans to increase site coverage and commercial floor area and reduce the side setback (east side) to facilitate a new restaurant, located at 68 East Meadow Drive, Unit 602/ Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100031) Applicant: Joe Staufer, represented by John G. Martin, Architect Planner: Rachel Friede The Commission heard a brief presentation on the action taken by staff and chose not to call the item up. There was no public comment. 5 minutes 5. A request for the review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to create Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch, from Part of Lot 9, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision (Red Sandstone Parking Lot), located at 715 North Frontage Road West/Lot 9, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100027) Applicant: Robert & Diane Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0 5 minutes 6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for a zone district boundary amendment to rezone Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision, (formerly Part of Lot 9, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision) from Medium Density Multiple Family (MDMF) District to the Housing (H) District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100028) Applicant: Robert & Diane Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0 5 minutes 7. A request for an amendment to an Approved Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12- 61 -11, Development Plan Required, Housing Zone District, Vail Town Code, to allow for revisions to the required landscape plan and geologic hazard mitigation plan for the redevelopment of the easternmost 5.24 acres of the Timber Ridge Village Apartments; and a request for the review of a variance, from Section 14 -5 -1, Minimum Standards, Parking Lot and Parking Structure Design Standards for All Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, Page 4 to allow for a crossover drive aisle width of less than thirty -feet (30') within the required parking structure, located at 1280 North Frontage Road /Lots 1 -5, Block C, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing 1,and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100018 /PEC100019) Applicant: Vail Timber Ridge L.L.C. Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0 5 minutes 8. A request for final review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -5, Conditional Uses: Generally (On All Levels Of A Building Or Outside Of A Building), Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of a public or private parking lot (parking structure); a vehicle maintenance, service, repair, storage, and fueling facility; a ski lift and tow (gondola), within "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road West, and the South Frontage Road West rig ht-of-way/U nplatted (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080063) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0 5 minutes 9. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of properties from Arterial Business District and unzoned South Frontage Road West right -of -way which is not zoned to Lionshead Mixed Use -2, properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 953 and 1031 South Frontage Road West and South Frontage Road West right -of -way, (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080061) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0 5 minutes 10. A request for a final review of a variance from 12- 71 -14, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, to allow for additional site coverage below grade, within "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 934 (BP Site), 953 (Vail Professional Building), 1031 (Cascade Crossing) S. Frontage Road / Unplatted; 862 (VR Maintenance Shop) and 923 (Holy Cross Lot) S. Frontage Road / Tracts A and B, S. Frontage Road Subdivision; 1000 (Glen Lyon Office Building) S. Frontage Road / Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090035) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0 5 minutes 11. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the removal of the Glen Lyon Commercial Site, Development Area D, (Glen Lyon Office Building) from the District for incorporation into the Page 5 properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West/Lot 54 Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090036) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Table to July 12, 2010 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0 12. Approval of June 14, 2010 minutes MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Schneidman VOTE: 4 -0 -1 (Pratt recused) 13. Information Update 14. Adjournment MOTION: Pratt SECOND: Schneidman VOTE: 3 -0 -0 ( Cartin and Viele not present) The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published June 25, 2010, in the Vail Daily Page 6