HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-0912 PECPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
September 12, 2011
�. 1:OOpm
TOWN OF VAII, '
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
30 minutes
1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments
to Chapter 12 -15, Gross Residential Floor Area, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7,
Amendment, Vail Town Code, related to the calculation of gross residential floor area on the
lowest level of a structure that contains a garage in the Hillside Residential, Single - Family
Residential, Two - Family Residential, and Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential Districts,
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110043)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
45 minutes
2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments
to Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment,
Vail Town Code, to establish a new zone district, Vail Village Townhouse (VVT) District, and
setting forth details in regard thereto; and a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council on proposed amendments to Chapter VII, Vail Village Sub - Areas, East Gore Creek Sub -
Area ( #6), Vail Village Master Plan, pursuant to Chapter VIII, Implementation and Amendment,
Vail Village Master Plan, to include recommendations related to a new Vail Village Townhouse
(VVT) District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110040, PEC110041)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations
amendments, pursuant to Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulations Amendment, Vail Town Code,
to Sections 11 -7 -15, Public Parking and Loading Signs for Private Property, Vail Town Code,
and 11 -7 -16, Informational and Directional Sign for Public Parking on Private Property, Vail Town
Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110021
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to September 26, 2011
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
4. A request for the review of a variance, pursuant to Section 14 -1 -5, Variances, Vail Town Code,
from Section 14 -10 -5, Building Materials and Design, Vail Town Code, to allow for the installation
of solar panels extending higher than one foot above the building ridgeline, located at 4918
Meadow Drive, Unit A/Lot 16, Block 7, Bighorn Subdivision Fifth Addition, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC100046)
Applicant: Warren Dean, represented by Capitol Solar Energy
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Table to September 26, 2011
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Page 1
5 minutes
5. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special
Development District No. 29, Crossview, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures,
Vail Town Code, to allow for the exchange of the on -site employee housing unit (EHU)
requirement in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 -13 -5, Employee Housing Unit Deed
Restriction Exchange Program, Vail Town Code; located at 1460 Buffehr Creek Road, Unit
G, /Lot G, Ridge at Vail, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110051)
Applicant: Craig B. Cohn and Sharon M. Puczynski
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Table to September 26, 2011
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
6. A request for the review of variances from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, and Section 12 -6D -9, Site
Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for
the construction of a carport within the side setback in excess of the allowable site coverage,
located at 2586 Davos Trail /Lot 4, Block E, Vail das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC110053)
Applicant: William R. Aylesworth, represented by Steve Francis
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to September 26, 2011
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
7. A request for the review of variances from Section 11 -6 -3A, Business Identification Signs, and
Section 11 -6 -3C, Menu Boxes, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances, Vail
Town Code, to allow for the installation of a freestanding business identification sign and a
freestanding menu box, located at 174 East Gore Creek Drive (Lodge at Vail) /Lots A, B, and C,
Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110052)
Applicant: Lodge Properties, Inc, represented by Graham Frank
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Withdrawn
8. Approval of July 25 and August 22, 2011 minutes
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
9. Information Update
10. Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970)
479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published September 9, 2011, in the Vail Daily.
Page 2
TOWN OF
VAIL ¢
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: September 12, 2011
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed
regulation amendments to Chapter 12 -15, Gross Residential Floor Area, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, related to
the calculation of gross residential floor area on the lowest level of a structure
that contains a garage in the Hillside Residential, Single - Family Residential, Two -
Family Residential, and Two - Family Primary/Secondary Residential Districts, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110043)
Appellant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
Staff is requesting that this item be tabled to the September 26, 2011 PEC Meeting at
the request of Kathy Langenwalter.
Iff]l►VAIJAIl:111
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: September 12, 2011
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed
regulation amendments to Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to establish a new
zone district, Vail Village Townhouse (VVT) District, and setting forth details in
regard thereto; and a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on
proposed amendments to Chapter VII, Vail Village Sub - Areas, East Gore Creek
Sub -Area ( #6), Vail Village Master Plan, pursuant to Chapter VIII, Implementation
and Amendment, Vail Village Master Plan, to include recommendations related to
a new Vail Village Townhouse (VVT) District, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC110040, PEC110041)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, Town of Vail, is requesting a work session to discuss the proposed Vail
Village Townhouse (VVT) District. At the Planning and Environmental Commission's
August 22nd work session, Staff presented an overview of the proposed new zone
district and related master plan amendments. The purpose of this work session is to
discuss the following topics in more depth:
Why a new zone district?
What does the Vail Village Master Plan recommend?
What development goals and policies should be applied to the existing
townhouse properties located in the Vail Village?
As this is a work session, Staff recommends the Planning and Environmental
Commission listens to the Staff presentation, asks questions, requests any additional
information needed for the review of this application, and then tables this items to its
September 26, 2011 public hearing for further deliberation.
II. BACKGROUND
This proposal is similar to past applications to first establish a new Vail Rowhouse
Special Development District and later to establish a new Vail Village Townhouse
District by Chris Galvin, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and KH Webb
Architects, which have since been withdrawn by Mr. Galvin. The Vail Town Council
generally supported the concept of establishing a new zone district that is tailored to
address these existing, unique townhouse properties in Vail Village. So upon Mr.
Galvin's withdrawal of his application, the Vail Town Council directed Staff to formally
submit a similar application, on behalf of the Town of Vail, to establish a new Vail
Village Townhouse District.
In 2008 and 2009, Chris Galvin, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and KH
Webb Architects, submitted and later withdrew multiple applications to establish the Vail
Townhouse Condominiums and the Vail Row Houses as a Special Development District
to create incentives for redevelopment and to address the various non - conformities of
the existing properties when regulated by the High Density Multiple - Family (HDMF)
District.
In 2010 and 2011, Chris Galvin, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and KH
Webb Architects, submitted and later withdrew an application to establish a new Vail
Village Townhouse District to create incentives for redevelopment and to address the
various non - conformities of the existing properties when regulated by the HDMF District.
It was anticipated that this proposed new district could be applied to the existing Vail
Townhouse Condominiums, Vail Row Houses, Vail Trails Chalets, Vail Trails East, and
the Texas Townhomes townhouse developments.
The Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed Mr. Galvin's application to
establish a new Vail Village Townhouse District at its April 26, May 10, June 14, July 12,
and August 23, 2010 public hearings. On August 23, 2010 the Planning and
Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town
Council for the proposed amendments with modifications.
The Planning and Environmental Commission and the Vail Town Council differed on
how much gross residential floor area (GRFA) was appropriate for the new zone district.
The Planning and Environmental Commission recommended a GRFA ratio of 1.35,
while the Vail Town Council recommended a GRFA ratio of 1.25 on the first reading of
the previous Vail Village Townhouse District ordinance.
On second reading of the previous ordinance, the Vail Town Council expressed its
concern that the development standards of the proposed zone district would not
adequately maintain the existing character of the neighborhood. The Vail Town Council
tabled the second reading of Mr. Galvin's proposal until the applicant and Staff returned
with additional regulations to preserve the neighborhood character.
At the Council's direction, Staff drafted design guidelines and master plan amendments
with the assistance of the Town's consultant, Winston and Associates, and input from
Town of Vail Page 2
Mr. Galvin's representatives, intended to preserve the existing character of the
neighborhood. Prior to presentation of these proposed design guidelines and master
plan amendments to the Vail Town Council, Mr. Galvin withdrew his application.
On July 25, 2011 the Planning and Environmental Commission held a work session to
discuss the Vail Village Townhouse District application re- initiated by Staff at the Vail
Town Council's request. Staff presented an overview of the previous Galvin
applications and a summary of the Town's current proposal. The Mauriello Planning
Group, representing Mr. Galvin, noted their general support for the new district and
presented alternatives to the proposed GRFA and building step -back standards. Vail
Rowhouse, Unit 11 owner Dolph Bridgewater expressed his opposition to the proposed
GRFA limits in the new district and the potential redevelopment of the neighboring
Galvin unit.
At the Planning and Environmental Commission's request, Staff mailed a courtesy
notice to each property owner of record and each home owners association at the Vail
Townhouse Condominiums, Vail Rowhouse, Vail Trails East, Vail Trails Chalet, and
Texas Townhomes informing them of the Commission's upcoming August 22nd work
session on the proposed new zone district. At the request of the Vail Townhouse
Condominiums homeowners association, the Commission's August 22nd work session
discussion was tabled to the Commission's September 12, 2011 public hearing.
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
WHY A NEW ZONE DISTRICT?
The existing townhouse properties in Vail Village such as the Vail Townhouse
Condominiums, Vail Row Houses, Texas Townhomes, Vail Trails East, and Vail Trails
Chalets are currently zoned High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) District. The
development standards applied to these properties have changed since their original
construction in the 1960's and 1970's. Today, these existing townhouse developments
are legally non - conforming in regard to several development standards of the current
HDMF District including setbacks, density, landscape area, parking, etc. Some of the
individual units in these townhouse developments, including units 7 -13 Vail Row
Houses and the Texas Townhomes, were subdivided into individual townhouse lots
years ago under Eagle County jurisdiction. The Town of Vail has treated these
individually platted units as independent development sites, rather than as one unit in a
larger comprehensive townhouse project. The standards of the Town's HDMF District
were intended to be applied to comprehensive multiple - family development sites (such
as multiple - family condominium buildings), and were not designed to be applied to the
individual units of a multiple - family building. For example, the HDMF District requires
20 foot side setbacks (i.e. a total of 40 linear feet of lot width) for attached, but
individually platted townhouses that have lots only 20 feet wide. In this scenario, the
side setbacks overlap and apply to the entire development site thus rendering the
property unbuildable without variances.
Town of Vail Page 3
Additionally, many existing townhouses originally constructed in the 1960's and 1970's
do not meet many of today's real estate market expectations. The challenges
associated with remodeling these existing townhouses range from technical engineering
and structural deficiencies to aesthetic and livability issues such as low ceiling heights.
Many of these issues are not easily addressed in a remodel construction project
compared to a demo /rebuild of the townhouse dwelling unit. Many of these existing
individual townhouse dwelling units already meet or exceed the currently allowable 0.76
GRFA ratio for their lot size in the HDMF District. This situation is due to original
construction occurring under previously less restrictive zoning requirements and the
construction of additions utilizing the Town's 250 Ordinance and Interior Conversion
additional GRFA policies. While The 250 Ordinance and Interior Conversion policies
created incentives for redevelopment, they also created inequities between properties in
the same zone district and within the same development.
Should a homeowner choose to demo /rebuild their existing townhouse dwelling unit, the
unit must be reconstructed in conformance with the 0.76 allowable GRFA limit of the
High Density Multiple - Family District. The homeowner could not reconstruct the existing
floor area associated with previous 250 Ordinance or Interior Conversion additions.
Additionally, if a homeowner chose to demo /rebuild their townhouse dwelling unit they
would no longer be eligible to construct future 250 Ordinance or Interior Conversion
additions since the dwelling unit would no longer qualify as being constructed prior to
1995. Changes to the existing HDMF District or the establishment of a new zone district
are necessary to address current homeowners' concerns about loosing floor area
development rights if pursuing a demo /rebuild of their dwelling unit. Amendments to the
HDMF District would affect numerous properties throughout Vail, while a new zone
district could be targeted to only apply to these existing townhouse properties in Vail
Village.
WHAT DOES THE VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN RECOMMEND?
Staff believes the following goals, objectives, and policies of the Vail Village Master Plan are
applicable to the proposed new Vail Village Townhouse District:
CHAPTER V. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTION STEPS
GOAL #1 Encourage high quality, redevelopment while preserving unique architectural
scale of the village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity.
Obiective 1.2. Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action Plan
and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide Plan.
Obiective 1.4. Recognize the "historic" importance of the architecture, structures,
landmarks, plazas and features in preserving the character of Vail Village.
Town of Vail Page 4
The following master plan recommendations from the Vail Village Master Plan are applicable to
the properties considered for the new Vail Village Townhouse District:
CHAPTER VII: Vail Village Sub -Areas
East Gore Creek Sub -Area ( #6)
EAST MIEAPgVV
_... [7F�IVE - 7.
A number of the earliest projects developed in Vail are located in the East Gore
Creek Sub -Area. Development in this area is exclusively multi - family
condominium projects with a very limited amount of support commercial.
Surface parking is found at each site, which creates a very dominant visual
impression of the sub -area.
While the level of development in East Gore Creek is generally greater than that
allowed under existing zoning, this area has the potential to absorb density
without compromising the character of the Village. This development could be
accommodated by partial infill of existing parking areas balanced by green
space additions or through increasing the height of existing buildings (generally
one story over existing heights). In order to maintain the architectural continuity
of projects, additional density should be considered only in conjunction with the
comprehensive redevelopment of projects.
Clearly, one of the main objectives to consider in the redevelopment of any
property should be to improve existing parking facilities. This includes satisfying
parking demands for existing and additional development, as well as design
considerations relative to redevelopment proposals. The opportunity to introduce
below grade structured parking will greatly improve pedestrianization and
landscape features in this area. This should be considered a goal of any
redevelopment proposal in this sub -area. Development or redevelopment of this
sub -area will attract additional traffic and population into this area and may have
significant impacts upon portions of Sub -Areas 7 and 10.
Town of Vail Page 5
WHAT DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND POLICIES SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE
EXISTING TOWNHOUSE PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE VAIL VILLAGE?
In reviewing the Galvin's previous special development district and townhouse zone
district applications, the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Vail Town
Council addressed the following policy questions:
Should the Town of Vail adopt a new zoning district specifically designed to
regulate existing townhouse properties in Vail Village or should these properties
continue to be zoned High Density Multiple Family District?
Previously, both the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Vail Town
Council recommended that a new zone district should be established to
specifically regulate the existing townhouse properties in Vail Village. Does the
Planning and Environmental Commission still recommend that a new zone
district should be established?
2. If the Town of Vail were to adopt a new zone district, should this district
economically incentivise the redevelopment of the existing townhouse properties
in Vail Village?
Previously, both the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Vail Town
Council recommended that a new zone district should create some incentives for
the redevelopment of existing townhouse properties. Does the Planning and
Environmental Commission still recommend that some incentives for
redevelopment should be included in a new zone district?
3. If the Town of Vail were to adopt a new zone district, should this district maintain
the existing character of the townhouse properties in Vail Village?
Previously, both the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Vail Town
Council recommended that a new zone district should maintain the neighborhood
character of the existing townhouse properties. Does the Planning and
Environmental Commission still recommend that the existing
neighborhood character should be preserved by new zone district?
In reviewing the Galvin's previous special development district and townhouse zone
district applications, the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Vail Town
Council recommended that the three previous policies decisions above could be
achieved by implementing the following amendments to the Vail Town Code and the
Vail Village Master Plan:
• Increasing development rights to reduce nonconformities and the need for future
variances.
• Increasing development rights to reduce inequities created by previous variances
and previous 250 Ordinance /Interior Conversion additions.
Town of Vail Page 6
• Establishing zoning standards that differentiate between townhouse buildings
and individually platted townhouse lots within a building.
• Basing lot area calculations on "site area" rather than the more restrictive
"buildable area".
• Reducing the minimum lot area standards for individually platted townhouse lots
within a building.
• Eliminating side setback requirements between adjoining individually platted
townhouse lots within a building.
• Reducing setback requirements to match the existing built conditions.
• Basing density calculations on "site area" rather than the more restrictive
"buildable area".
• Increasing the allowable density standards to match existing built conditions.
• Basing GRFA calculations on "site area" rather than the more restrictive
"buildable area".
• Facilitating "demo /rebuild" redevelopment without the loss of existing
development potential by eliminating "250 Ordinance" and "Interior Conversion"
additions and adjusting the GRFA formula to include an equivalent floor area
potential.
• Increasing the allowable GRFA above current levels.
• Reducing the minimum landscape area standards.
• Modifying the parking standards to allow existing surface parking conditions to
continue in the front setback and street right -of -way.
• Establishing design guidelines to preserve the existing neighborhood character.
(This policy was recommended by the Vail Town Council after the Planning and
Environmental Commission's review of the previous Galvin applications)
Does the Planning and Environmental Commission still recommend that these
general amendments to the Zoning Regulations and the Vail Village Master Plan
be implemented?
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission still recommend implementing
these general zoning amendments, Staff intends to discuss the details of these
proposed amendments at up- coming Commission work sessions. For example, if the
Town of Vail Page 7
Commission still recommends adopting a new zone district with different gross
residential floor area (GRFA) allowances than the existing HDMF District, Staff
recommends a work session to discuss the appropriate standards for the new district:
ratios of 1.25 vs 1.35 vs 1.50; repeal or maintain the 250 Ordinance and Interior
Conversion provisions; etc.
Further, if the Planning and Environmental Commission still recommends implementing
these general master plan amendments, Staff intends to discuss in the detail the
proposed design guidelines intended to preserve the existing neighborhood character
by addressing development patterns, architectural themes, building form and massing,
street edge, building facades, cantilevered floor areas, roof pitches and ridges, fences
and site walls, landscaping, deck rails, parking, etc.
IV. RECOMMENDATION
As this is a work session, Staff recommends the Planning and Environmental
Commission listens to the Staff presentation, asks questions, requests any additional
information needed for the review of this application, and then tables this items to its
September 26, 2011 public hearing for further deliberation.
Town of Vail Page 8
ili I Ir'
Maudello Planning Group
July 28, 201 1
Planning and Environmental Commission
c/o Bill Gibson, AICP
Planner 2
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81620
Re: Table of Contents to Presentation — Town House Zone District
Dear Planning and Environmental Commission:
Attached to this letter is a copy of the presentation that we made to the PEC on July 25,
2011. We added a cover page to the presentation with a table of contents. We believe this
presentation can be used as a reference document throughout the review of the new Town
House Zone District.
We appreciate the opportunity to work with staff to reintroduce this topic to the PEC. Staff
has done an outstanding job balancing all of the input and direction it has received from the
public and Town Council over the last year or two. We believe the product that has been
produced by staff positively reflects this hard work and the character of the neighborhood.
As evidence, we only have two recommended changes to the proposed regulations and
guidelines.
As a next step, we urge the PEC first dive into the details of the new Town House Zone
District proposal in its entirety as overviewed in the attached PDF and more fully written in
the draft ordinance and resolution prepared by staff. The proposals host many thoughtful
trade -offs and compromises already orchestrated by the Town's staff with suggestions that
came forth from Vail architects, planning professionals, urban design consultants, and
homeowners. We think the PEC will find a balanced set of new zoning rules and design
guidelines proposed for Vail's new Town House Zone District when it delves into its many
aspects.
Thanks again for being given an opportunity to participate in this process. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP
Principal
O
O
ct • 1.
M 0
a�
C: E c:
C: tv 0 tv
v U v
� � m s
N%Uw000
M
( _ a
O O
a L
O c: CL
ct L ct —
CL
O O •� >
> 4-j '
O
O O —
4-j
s
._ CL U
I� v N M c:
O M (1) Ln r-%, O
1 1 L40)
' — oC oo m c
N N M L .0
cn cn -p cn cn
4� 4� m 4� 4) • >
ct ct 03 ct C13 L.
CL CL LL CL CL 0.
• • • •
ct
a
O
040 CL
c
� N
v F-
0 V)
3
a�
Z
•
ct
0
0.
0
L
CL
Ln
0 v
N u
a
tv
v
� o-
o
s
C
o
o
0
— � Q
C: .�
•::o. s
cv
U
•
0 LM
cd
cd
LL
s cd
s
H
•
L
3
O
0
E
O
I
i
�—' O
E
E
O
u
O
E
E
0 c�
E C�
> O
'+-j m
u
Q
•
�61�j
.�
.cz
u
O
M
3
O
0
E
O
cd
I
O
-v
CL
L
u
vi
w
.c
>
cd
c�
�6�
.�
.cd
u
O
M
\cd
cz
L
cd
c
s
cd
cz O
' cz b�y0
i
O -°
a
c
� O
u♦'
Co
• •
s
L
cd
N
N
-v
=v
s
N
u
O
L
CL
N
*%O
ON
a
L
a�
a
0
L
CL
•
T
O
I
3
F-
a�
V
O
a
O
-v
tv
-v
O
OE
a�o
O
m
•
L
O
L
a
O
L
O
L
a
LC
a
a�
a�
a�o
I
•
O
O
Cv
>
O
cisL
a
a
-v
cv
V
.cis
L.
cis
a
E
a
a�
a�o
s
a-
0
>
s
.3
a
a
c�
s
3
a�
O
a�o
•
a�
a�
0
LC
L
L
O
�-
�
O
•�
L
E
O
C:
,--,
0
1.
O
E
v
tv
p
O
-
s
s
O
O
O
I
I
I
O
O
N �
N N N
O
a 4C-11 � Q
o
CL
LL
E
U �
• • F- O N O
L M O c�
_ - L
cn
4-J
a O o- O
0 o p
LM s
o p
t)LO O 0O LL -v LL > cn
(1) a 4
v >o U U °_ Ln
O
V _ O - - E
� 'U 'U
M ) o U V o -v
W cn — —
U U O -
v
U �`! LL
L a�
• • • • •
V
i
0
a�
c
O
N
3
a�
Z
-v
c
O
L
uo
u
cd
m
6-1
w
u O
C� � 4) p
.V N C: O 0 p M b0
mo = N •C:
+� 0 O ao
o Q
n O O c�
a� �F- >_ C:
u a; W O — O
tw
O cn c
O >
0 a` °- O
O _ -v O
D O a� a
V) N -o C O
v u Co
4-) — E u
�
-v ° E
a)� Op p
E u U
c� 4) � b�y0 O
V � O .— C ♦,
U a) 3 a U 3 u
Wp O x w ° o0
C F- (1) CL N ��
O
O
• V �
U O
rV E
• � � br0
'E
O
O N
O
(� E
� O._
s �
L - >
,--� `~
O ._
•
00*00%.�
O
N
L
c�
c�
4�
4�
br0
c
br0
4�
b-0
L
O
X
(1)
C�
E
C�s
O �
L �
� � O
O
� V �
� L
O •
V O c�
� s �
� � O
L
� � X
D w
•
O
O
• V �
U O
rV E
'E
O
O N
O
(� E
� O._
s �
L — >
,--� `~
O ._
•
00*00%.�
O
N
L
c�
c�
4�
TW
V
br0
c
b-0
4�
b-0
L
O
X
(1)
C�
E
C�s
r �
O �
� O
L
� � O
O
� V �
� L
O •
O � s-
V O c�
� s �
� � O
L
D W
•
Q
a�
a�
4�
a�
Q
V
4�
,o
Q
,V
Q
a�
Q
Q
O
^0
4�
Q
Q
V
V
i
0
c
O
N
N
2
c
3
C
N
N
L
N
L
C
0
c�
•u
L
-v
c�
u
L
•o
L
a�
x
a�
-v
o
� o
o
0
� u
� s �
� u
� � Q
c�
•
WN
O
�
z
_
O
O
O
WN
a
>
u
p
O
�
u
..
a
�
O
cn
cn
Od
cn
O
O
o
Q
U
a�
L
.
•
C
N
N
L
N
L
C
0
c�
•u
L
-v
c�
u
L
•o
L
a�
x
a�
-v
o
� o
o
0
� u
� s �
� u
� � Q
c�
•
vrV
cd
0 cd >
L �o
cd =
cd cd
0 Q Q)
0 cd
u 0
Cld L.
cc:
LL
0 s %01
o 0
a�
L
3
a�
Z
cd
s
-v
a�
Owo
c
M
s
vl
cd
s
cz >
0 s
O cz u •+j
O O cn cz
C C a O
O cz
O C cz O
O C: O CZ (A s
cz
0 E cn O
0 O v .0 O
C> O � 4� 40- LW b0 b0 V
— cz C:
C"I L — —
._ ._ ._ —
W � s a.—
E0 4--) 4--)
0 CZ
1. C:
U. z 0 0
• •
3
a�
Z
cd
s
-v
a�
Owo
c
M
s
vl
cd
s
c
cd
L.
W
n�
O • — cd
o- �o u O
o 4C.13 4 cn
CL u — v
p •�,
E ct
O •—
cn E 4�
O L. cd O
o
� — � p
L. m O —
C 4-) •4-,
O � Cld p cd b�0
4-) O • N 4)
N • V — 4)
O
U. U. — N
•
O
—
E
—
mo
M
N
N
N
L
N
L
s
u
O
O
oC
M
3
a�
Z
cd
s
-v
a�
Owo
c
M
s
vl
cd
s
Loa'sJ
N
N
N
L
N
L
mo
m
4�
L
L
O
W
c�
m
V
4�
L
0
c�
V
4m.
N
z
�O
L
O
V
a�
O
V
L
O
c�
V
4�
O
L
7
C:
O
-v
c
O
u
O
O
.-
L
O
O
t
V
CL
U
C)
N
,-
4
•—
V
ct
L401
•
4—)
a
O
L
CL
O
N
•-
E
.-
O
L
• Ln
•
N
N
N
L
N
L
mo
m
4�
L
L
O
W
c�
m
V
4�
L
0
c�
V
4m.
N
z
�O
L
O
V
a�
O
V
L
O
c�
V
4�
O
L
7
C:
O
-v
c
O
u
6J
cd
u
LM
p r, dp-
44
Wh
(1)
cd
u
M
L.L
4�
2:2
.-0
ol
�_J
cd
V
L
p r, dp-
44
Wh
(1)
cd
u
M
LL
N
3
0
-v
c
3
C�
U
n
0
V
w
L
Ln
4
11
0
4-J
4-J
4-J
4-3
0
CO
4-J
co
0
V)
Co
o
co
4-J
v
L.
co
(1)
4co
4-J
u
a-
0
C'S
4-J
4-J
11
•
•A
•
Co
-,
C)
4-
0
L.
0
o
0
0
0
4-J
.1
00
Co
L),
%4—
co
v
0
:E
cz
4-J
4-J
E
o
4-J
J_
V)
4—
4-J
I
li�
Aw.
A.
&W�
*AAM
*ANW
440M
%ow.
ow Air*
wl.11
so
A
E4D
SA
w -
rr
r
t
r
i
♦ i'
r
�rwr�
•,IM
arww
WAWIIr,rrr.s
■r w+
i
s
4-J
•3
N
N
N C
�/
4-J
cd
U N
E
N
N
M
E
L-
o
�--�
_d
L
%4'-
N
N
`� N
O
O
`.
—
t!
N
2
O
E
00
O
LN
N
�
_u
L •C
cd
E
cd
`O
L U
Cz
'L
4-J
'p
NN
0
-p N
Q.
�-
C
N
L.
c E
CU
rq
O
S
•
V)
d
U-
N cd
w -
rr
r
t
r
i
♦ i'
r
�rwr�
•,IM
arww
WAWIIr,rrr.s
■r w+
i
L-1
A
•
V^
z 0
S
C: 4-J
0
� V
4-J CO
S 0
4-J 4-J
C:
0
N c:
co
L
co L
a 0
N 3
0
co V)
N S
C�0 cn
-� 4-J
L �
0 0
0 4-J
L 4-J
co C:
E
0-0
7
E
L-1
�4
a
c
0
4-J
co
co
4-J
o
4-J
4-J
4-J 0
co
•E
4-J
0
Co
C:
CO
>
0 -a
0
co co C:
m
a
O
4-) CO
V
N
O
O
co 'D
E
L
0 0
O *lp
0 C:
L 0
co co
4-
c: O
0 C:
N O
�4-J
L 0-
N �
S �
4-J
O
C S
co 4-J
V
N
N
E E C: •-
0 �E
i
0
7
WN
0.0
W
c�
c�
v
C)d
ZV
C)
ct
(A
0
0.
0
L.
CL
V)
J,
1
(1)
s 0
F�m
L
U
N
t
u
L
WIPd"-
L 0 Tof
c
N
0X
LU
ct
O
0.
O
L
CL
an
.Mp
w
r
+rrlA
i
L
NON
o
bo
4-J
O
E
�s
N
•�
>
•(A
is
L.
V
)
L
=;
V
U-0
O
v
0
-p!
Ns
• �
•—
—
•�
�
•E
4
X
0
v
m
0
0
C�
AA.°
Now,
•
Co
�co
V
C�
Ln
Ln
km
i
L
O
S
E
co
h(1)�
TAI
V
M
V
�O
M
O
ME
It"s
i
co
!JL
L
p
>
N
040
C
cd
t
U
N
O
a
O
L
d
L
=3
O
O
0.
O
L.
cd
t
.3
C
N
N
N
L
l�0
cd
"IX0
0
O
00
•
W`
O`
0
O
W`
W
L
O
c�
S
O
O
J
0
L
0
a
N
N
L
X
w
1
O
0
N
c�
J
•
(d
N
0
N
N
d
�
a
O
�
O
�
v�
p-
O
�
O
L
N
�
N
�
3
�
L
�
O
�
C:
>
�
>
u
u
v�
4
4
i�
a
•
M
�4
@I
n
0 L
4-J r.4
'N
2
Im
�_J
cd
V
L
ap r, dp-
N
cd
u
M
LL
0
co
-v
IV,
co
a�
3
co
CA 0
N
3
0
-v
c
3
C�
U
{
1!
s
0
V'1
V
�
�
V
L
�
1!
s
0
V'1
C**4
4t
cd
C
L
(1)
Q
LL
0
•
LL
C
s�
.>
W
w
O�
r,
rm
U LA-
PIP
CC W W
0 oC 0
Q Ln
M Ln
.--�
co
O
O
M
O
Q ~ Q
U- p lL
W
Ln aQ. 'n
N 0- Ln
0
V
O
Q
cc O CC
QLn
r-1
Ln
O r-4
U
Q
LL.
C71 �
N9
Q
co CC
r_
r,
rm
r �
PIP
Q
LL.
C71 �
N9
Q
co CC
r_
Q
U.
fT d
QIl)
r-r
Q
co
00
r-1
r �
C
Q
U.
fT d
QIl)
r-r
Q
co
00
r-1
_ O W Y W W_ U
~ o W ui ? d Lij
�WO CC LA
U 0w
J Z W
W a
r �
_ O W Y W W_ U
~ o W ui ? d Lij
�WO CC LA
U 0w
J Z W
W a
•
pr
POP-
rr ry
pm
PM
=7
rip
WMIM
pmr,
-
Z
FO CC
F
CC < u
0>w
Z Lij Cr-
-1 0
LIJ �
9t I
U.
OD cC
0
Qp
0 cc
I-- of
O'n,
n
V-4
41
0
F
U-
cr
0
0 Ln
J U-1
rr ry
PM
=7
rip
-
Z
FO CC
F
CC < u
0>w
Z Lij Cr-
-1 0
LIJ �
9t I
U.
OD cC
0
Qp
0 cc
I-- of
O'n,
n
V-4
41
0
F
U-
cr
0
0 Ln
J U-1
z
Z o 0
j 0 0 0 0) 0
0 U U0 00
uj -j
U-
co CC
LL
4
ppp-
z
Z o 0
j 0 0 0 0) 0
0 U U0 00
uj -j
U-
co CC
LL
4
rn
4t
cd
C
L
(1)
Q
LL
0
Q
LL
�
�
o
rw000
E
�
�
o
� 03
o
cd
L �
4) L
N
Q o
Q o
LL a
� s
Q
•
W
Jc
L4-
O
W
mo c
cd O
C •O
c V —
V L •V
a� V Q
4) cd L
s m Q) Q
r--) O s
O
� a� O
� Cld
I ci LL oC
• u O J� J.,,) J!lD
V)
Z
0
Ul
CL
0
Q
tl
cr-
�1
F-
0
J
Ia) 77D >
" >
(n J
N N
N �
IZ' J
cc
� Q
•)
N N
N
L i
(n J
_.
N 5
IZ' J
I
F-
w
J
W
Z
0
U
W
Ln
F-
Ln
W
r13
C.
N 5
E J
�o
� N
O
N J
O 0-
a
v0
o�
O �
' Z_
1� Z
II 0
W
D
0
z
O
0
Q
cc
L,
a
a,
®
u-
r1w
FOR
I
F-
w
J
W
Z
0
U
W
Ln
F-
Ln
W
r13
C.
N 5
E J
�o
� N
O
N J
O 0-
a
v0
o�
O �
' Z_
1� Z
II 0
W
D
0
z
O
0
Q
cc
L,
a
a,
®
u-
LO
.
z
_0
Z
0>
ci:Q
V1 J
0w
Z J
W
uj
CJ
1
E
q
a�
L
(n J
Q' J
WTI IF --- - 11' W-. I
Mij
1%. 11w 1 .1 A
-v an s
o -
� L �
' :tt 0 Q L W
J o oC Ln
Cc U cv U^
s
— ,'n L I
.c
V",
P-,c
Mir
m
cis
k LL
+-J oC
O -
J
/i
07
Q
Ln H
O
N ry
J
� �
x
� 41
L �
OZ0
n
t �ia�;0
4�
L �
OZr)
E
m
cis
LL
r-J oC
O -
J
07
O
J
N
H
ry
0
C
v
�z O
m U
No
mi'L
���
L �
� o a�
�
�
L �
4-J o a�
E
m
Is
V)
Z
0
Ul
CC
CL
O
Q
tl
cr-
�1
F-
0
J
Ia) 77D >
" >
(n J
N N
N �
IZ' J
cc
� Q
•)
N N
N
L i
(n J
N 5
IZ' J
�o
� N
O
N J
O 0-
a
v0
o�
O �
' Z_
1� Z
II 0
W
0 D
F 0
> Z
W 3
W 0
Z>
0
U
W
Ln
F-
Ln
W
N 5
E J
r. pq I-- --
!�A?
rlw FOR
Q
cc
0
Ln
u,
a
rn
®
u-
cr.
LO
z
_0
Z
_0
0>
cl:Q
V1 J
0w
Z J
W
W
cd
N N �
� O O
O L c
Ln
V
E o
�.j
O Cld L N �
u
Q �Mo�
0
LL .Ct Q � LL
C: 0
TOWN OAIL
MEMBERS PRESENT
Bill Pierce
Michael Kurz
Luke Cartin
Henry Pratt
Pam Hopkins
John Rediker
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
July 25, 2011
1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS ABSENT
Tyler Schneidman
SITE VISITS
1. Briar Patch — 1446 Buffehr Creek Road; 1386, 1388 and 1390 Briar Patch Lane; 1374 and 1378
Sandstone Drive
2. Vail Townhouse Condominiums, Vail Row Houses, Texas Townhomes, Vail Trails East and
West
20 minutes
A request for the review of a preliminary plan and a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -3, Major
Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for amendments to the existing Parcels A through F and
Units 1 through 3 of the Residences at Briar Patch, and the creation of Parcels G and H of the
Residences at Briar Patch for the purposes of preserving open space and mitigating high
severity rockfall hazards, located at 1446 Buffehr Creek Road; 1386, 1388, and 1390 Briar Patch
Lane; 1374 and 1378 Sandstone Drive /Lots G2, G5, and G6, Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 2
(Residences at Briar Patch), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110034)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -1 (Pierce recused)
Bill Pierce recused himself due to professional conflict.
Bill Gibson made a presentation per the Staff memorandum.
Henry Pratt asked how the Town can make a recommendation since the Town is the applicant.
Wendy St. Charles, representative of the Briar Patch Association, stated that the associate is in
agreement with the Town's application.
Commissioner Rediker asked if the Town has worked out negotiations for the land purchase.
Wendy St. Charles responded that most negotiations were completed, but the sale was not
complete.
Commissioner Rediker asked if the land sale was contingent upon the approval of new parcels
and building envelopes.
Bill Gibson responded that the new envelopes were not related to the land purchase.
Page 1
Commissioner Rediker asked if Town Staff determined it was appropriate for a change in
building envelopes to be included with the creation of the new parcel.
Bill Gibson responded that the creation of the new parcels and building envelope changes was
appropriate to be reviewed together as they could be approved independently of each other
should the Commission feel that one was appropriate and the other was not.
Wendy St. Charles added that the HOA want to amend the parcels and building envelopes prior
to the Town seeking to purchase Tract G.
Commissioner Rediker asked if the Town Attorney has reviewed whose obligation it is to mitigate
hazards. He asked whose responsibility and liability it is for the rockfall hazard today and into the
future.
Bill Gibson responded he was unsure if the Town Attorney had reviewed that matter.
Commissioner Cartin asked what is to the west of the proposed Parcel G.
Bill Gibson responded it is a Town of Vail owned open space parcel.
Commissioner Cartin asked about the Timber Ridge project hazard mitigation and whether the
land purchase means the Town has chosen to mitigate with netting.
Warren Campbell responded that any mitigation plans would be reviewed by the Commission at
a future hearing as was required by a condition placed on the previous approval.
Commissioner Cartin added that any addition and construction that is near the ridgeline and
visible from below is not favorable.
Wendy St. Charles stated that the HOA worked with the Town to ensure no additional ridgeline
development.
Commissioner Cartin asked about when there is a hazard, who is responsible for mitigation.
Bill Gibson explained the Town Code process and procedures required for hazard mitigation.
The Town does not typically mitigate hazards on private property.
Commissioner Kurz asked why the hazard has not already been mitigated.
Gibson responded that there is no Town Code requirement that the HOA mitigate a hazard
affecting a neighboring property.
Commissioner Pratt asked what rules the town has to administer and regulate envelopes.
Wendy St. Charles stated that the restrictions are on the plat.
Commissioner Rediker stated he understands the goals of the homeowners. He stated the
Town's portion of the deal is not a good deal. The parcel is being purchased with taxpayer
money to mitigate issues that are the responsibility of the current owners.
Commissioner Pratt stated that he agrees with Commissioner Rediker. Commissioners Cartin
and Hopkins agreed with these statements.
Page 2
George Ruther stated that the Vail Town Council and legal Staff have discussed this issue at
length and feel this is an appropriate purchase for the Town.
Commissioner Cartin stated that the Commissioners should see the mitigation options for Timber
Ridge. He would also like more legal input at a future hearing regarding mitigation liability.
George Ruther stated that the Vail Town Council decided to acquire this property in order to
have control of the property and determine mitigation versus dealing with another landowner. He
stated that it could be a less expensive option than other mitigation methods.
Commissioner Pratt stated that this is not a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, but rather
a final review and final decision.
20 minutes
2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for amendments to the Town of Vail
Land Use Plan Map, pursuant to Chapter VIII, Implementation, Town of Vail Land Use Plan, to
allow for a land use category change from Medium Density Residential to Open Space; and a
request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary amendment,
pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning from
Residential Cluster District to Natural Area Preservation District, located at 1448 Buffehr Creek
Road /Lot G, Residences at Briar Patch Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC110042)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Recommendation of approval
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -1 -0 ( Rediker opposed)
Bill Gibson made a presentation per the Staff memorandum
Commissioner Rediker asked why the applicant is the Town of Vail, when the property is not
currently in their ownership.
Bill Gibson stated that the Town can impose zoning on any property owner. He further explained
that the plat was noticed prior to the rezoning and with the time spent on the plat the application
for the major subdivision "caught -up" with the rezoning application. The intent of the proposed
condition was to make any recommendation forwarded by the Commission contingent upon the
recording of the related plat.
Wendy St. Charles, representative of the Residences at Briar Patch HOA, stated that the
contract stipulates rezoning and that she felt it was appropriate for the Commission to consider
the rezoning at this time.
Commissioner Pratt clarified that the Commission is only making a recommendation to the Vail
Town Council, who will determine if the zoning is appropriate for the property.
45 minutes
3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments
to Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment,
Vail Town Code, to establish a new zone district, Vail Village Townhouse (VVT) District, and
setting forth details in regard thereto; and a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council on proposed amendments to Chapter VII, Vail Village Sub - Areas, East Gore Creek Sub -
Area ( #6), Vail Village Master Plan, pursuant to Chapter VIII, Implementation and Amendment,
Page 3
Vail Village Master Plan, to include recommendations related to a new Vail Village Townhouse
(VVT) District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110040, PEC110041)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Tabled to August 22, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0
Bill Gibson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. He clarified the intent of the new
zone district and that today's hearing was a work session. Mr. Gibson covered several elements
of the application that had changed since the Commission had last seen the application.
Dominic Mauriello, representing Chris Galvin, owner in the Vail Rowhouses, gave a power point
presentation highlighting several suggestions his client has regarding Staff's proposed Vail
Village Townhouse District. The presentation included the history of the zoning for the
properties, history of the Commission actions on the previous SDD applications and zone district
establishment. The presentation covered the architectural standards and guidelines proposed
with in the Vail Village Master Plan amendments. The applicant suggested changes to the
building step backs, the possible elimination of GRFA and reliance on Design Guidelines, and if
that is not palatable why a 1.5 GRFA ratio is appropriate. An argument was made that the bulk
and mass created by a 1.5 GRFA ratio was not visually distinguishable from 1.35 or 1.25 GRFA
ratios.
Junn Dunn, attorney representing Dolph Bridgewater, owner of Vail Row House Unit 11, asked
Bill Gibson to clarify that the previous Ordinance that was approved upon first reading on was no
longer proceeding forward and had been withdrawn. The application before the Commission
was a new consideration of this application.
Dolph Bridgewater, owner of Unit 11 in the Vail Row House, spoke to the background on his
involvement in the previous applications. He spoke to his notification with regard to the latest
application and inability to prepare a response in time for the packets. He has provided a written
response to the application for the hearing today. He covered the history of how the application
grew from addressing several equity issues to additional development potential. In his opinion
this application represents bad public policy. Forcing redevelopment for a non - public goal he
does not understand. There is not a stated public goal in conjunction with the application.
People visit Vail because of an aesthetic and policy is needed to protect the "historic district"
which he believes his property is included within.
Commissioner Rediker encouraged Mr. Bridgewater to prepare a statement for the next public
hearing. He further questioned if the Town has heard from any other members of these projects
regarding their support or lack of support for the application. He felt that it would be appropriate
to provide notice to all the properties being considered for inclusion in a new Vail Village
Townhome District.
Jim Lamont, representing the Vail Homeowners Association, wanted to make it clear that the
Board of his association was not taking an official stance on this proposal. He has been
speaking to multiple methods of addressing the issues and hand in this application. He
highlighted a generational division between older individuals who are reluctant to change and the
younger generation seeking a different vision. He stated that we need to think through Vail
Village and how we want to see it change and remain intact for future generations, and leaving it
intact does not mean leaving it the same.
Henry Pratt had to depart at 4:00 pm and was not present for the vote upon the items
conclusion.
Page 4
Commissioner Hopkins stated her familiarity with several of the projects under consideration for
this new zone district. Many of the projects are condominium ownership and she believe that
this needs to be addressed. She believes the zone district should have a basis in a historic vein
verse a townhouse district. She is concerned about the two story step back at 20 feet creating an
undesirable outcome. She does not believe that the fagade articulation will be enough. She
does not like the first come first served approached to the front fagade. She is also concerned
about six story elevation on the rear of the buildings.
Commissioner Cartin is complex and not all properties will achieve the same amount of
deduction. These properties are townhouse style, not true townhouse development. Are we
mashing elements together which will create future headaches. He does not support reducing
the step back to 5 -7 feet on the upper floor. These projects are a unique to what is surrounding
them from the Village core to Manor Vail. He recommended cleaning up parking easements and
public road adjacent to the tennis courts. He is cautious about allowing the buildings to get to
much larger.
Commissioner Pierce stated that it feels like a project in search of zoning. He will be looking at
heights below 43 feet. He suggested that 38 feet is about as high as the projects should get.
The result is going to need to be a balance between GRFA, height, setbacks, site coverage, etc.
Made a comment about the inset deck and what the Code says about enclosed are being
counted towards GRFA and proper design.
Commissioner Rediker stated that many of his concerns had been identified by other
commissioners. He is not opposed to some additional height and GRFA to accompany
redevelopment. He does not believe it is possible to achieve 6 stories at the rear, but the
concern is his as well. He would like to understand how the GRFA ratios has been bouncing
around over all the hearings. He does not understand why landscaping area is being reduced to
20% from 30 %. He did not understand how a difference in 1.25 and 1.5 GRFA was beneficial
beyond additional value to the lots.
Commisisoner Kurz identified concerns about the uniformity in the design guidelines creating too
much uniformity and that the character of the neighborhood is the difference. He believes the
proposal has gone past the scope of the original challenge. He still believes that 1.35 ratio is
appropriate and reached after great deliberation.
Commissioner Hopkins stated that height is a concern.
Jim Lamont mentioned that a future conveyance Chalet Road may need to be addressed by the
Town for as part of this application and the overall Village master plan n i ng/streetscape process.
20 minutes
4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations
amendments, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for corrections to
Section 12 -6F -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow communications antennas and
appurtenant equipment as a conditional use in the Low Density Multiple Family Districts; and for
prescribed regulations amendments, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code,
for corrections to Section 12 -6E -2, Permitted Uses; Section 12 -6F -2, Permitted Uses; Section
12 -6G -2, Permitted Uses; and Section 12 -13 -4, Requirements by Employee Housing Unit (EHU)
Type, Vail Town Code, to allow Type III Employee Housing Units (EHUs) as a permitted use in
the Residential Cluster (RC), Low Density Multiple Family (LDMF), and Medium Density Multiple
Family (MDMF) Districts, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110023)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Page 5
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Recommendation of Approval
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0
Rachel Friede gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.
There was no public comment.
The Commissioners expressed their support for the application.
5 minutes
5. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments
to Chapter 12 -15, Gross Residential Floor Area, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7,
Amendment, Vail Town Code, related to the calculation of gross residential floor area on the
lowest level of a structure that contains a garage in the Hillside Residential, Single - Family
Residential, Two - Family Residential, and Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential Districts,
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110043)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to August 8, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0
5 minutes
6. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations
amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will
implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC090028)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Table to September 26, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0
5 minutes
7. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations
amendments, pursuant to Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulations Amendment, Vail Town Code,
to Sections 11 -7 -15, Public Parking and Loading Signs for Private Property, Vail Town Code,
and 11 -7 -16, Informational and Directional Sign for Public Parking on Private Property, Vail Town
Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110021)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to August 22, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0
5 minutes
8. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the Special Events Plans for the
2011 US Pro Cycling Challenge, to allow for temporary exemptions from Title 10, Building
Codes, Title 11, Sign Regulations, Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development
Standards, Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110044)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Withdrawn
9. Approval of July 11, 2011 minutes
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 5 -0 -0
Page 6
10. Information Update
11. Adjournment
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5 -0 -0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970)
479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published July 22, 2011, in the Vail Daily.
Page 7
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
August 22, 2011
1:OOpm
TOWN OVAIL
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Bill Pierce
Henry Pratt
Luke Cartin
Tyler Schniedman
John Rediker
Pam Hopkins
20 minutes
A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -7A -3, Conditional
Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a real estate office, located at 100 East Meadow Drive Unit 34
(Vail Village Inn) /Lot M, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC110049)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Joni Taylor Real Estate Company
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 7 -0 -0
CONDITION(S):
1. The applicant shall comply with Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town Code, and any
violation of such may result in a call -up of this conditional use permit.
Rachel Friede made a presentation per the staff memorandum.
Barney Dill, representing Joni Taylor Real Estate, described the success of their business and the
need to have office space in the village.
Commissioner Rediker inquired about the acquisition of parking.
Mr. Dill discussed how and where they were going to acquire additional parking spaces in the
Gateway.
Commissioner Pratt inquired into the application statement regarding this not being a commercial
establishment.
Mr. Dill stated that he was trying to highlight that they were going to use the location for an office and
not to achieve "a store front" in Vail Village.
There was no public comment.
30 minutes
2. A request for the review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -7H -7, Major Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for additions to, and the exterior renovation of,
the Lion Square Lodge East, located at 660 West Lionshead Place 1 /Lot 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1,
Addition 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110047)
Applicant: Lion Square Lodge East, represented by Bill Anderson
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Hopkins VOTE: 6 -1 -0 (Pierce opposed)
Page 1
CONDITIONS:
1. This approval of a major exterior alteration is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town
of Vail design review approval for this proposal.
2. Prior to requesting a temporary or final certificate of occupancy for this proposal, the
applicant must obtain Town of Vail approval of an amendment final plat to update the
Condominium Map to show the improvements associated with this proposal.
3. Prior to requesting a temporary or final certificate of occupancy for this proposal, the
applicant shall mitigate 1,365 sq. ft. of employee housing floor area in accordance with the
requirements of the Chapter 12 -24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code.
Bill Gibson made a presentation per the Staff memorandum.
Chip Melick made a presentation highlighting the elements of the proposed redevelopment.
Commissioner Pierce inquired as to the reconstruction of the below grade units.
Mr. Melick explained that there would be light wells included in the new design.
Bill Gibson asked Mr. Melick to discuss how much each addition was extending out from the face of
the existing fagade.
Commissioner Pierce stated that it would have been helpful to have the site staked for the site visit.
He stated he would need to see the staking of the building prior to voting on the project. He
expressed concern about the extent of the stair and elevator tower encroachment towards the
parking area and the amount of area between the parking lot and the building fagade.
Jeff Babb, representing Vail Resorts, spoke to the desire to work with the neighbor and mentioned
concerns about landscaping encroaching into the ski yard.
Commissioner Pierce asked Mr. Melick to discuss the landscaping plan.
Commissioner Pratt inquired if landscaping was located within the assumed setback on the ski yard.
Chip Melick stated that there was no new landscaping in the assumed setback.
Commissioner Pratt asked for additional detail on the proposed roofs over each new entry. He
asked whether the roofs are cantilevered and whether they extend out to the edge of the parking
area.
Mr. Melick explained how the roofs would be constructed over two entries and the deck would be
extending out to cover the other three entries.
Commissioner Pierce inquired as to the form of the building on the north elevation. He asked if
there were any changes to the form of the north elevation.
Mr. Melick stated that there were largely no changes to the overall form of the north elevation.
Commissioner Pierce stated that it feels like the east and west facades have dramatically changed
and the north and south facades are retaining some foreign elements which are not seen in the new
design. He added that he felt that he would benefit from having a 3 -D or physical model.
Page 2
Commissioner Pratt stated that most of his comments were largely architectural, which was not
within the Commission's purview (it's a Design Review Board issue) . He stated that the roof forms
over the new entry were of concern. He added that the project is an improvement.
Bill Gibson explained that the Commission is able to comment on roof form elements as it is in the
context of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
Commissioner Kurz stated that the proposal was an improvement and not too divergent from the
previously approved plan.
Commissioner Hopkins stated that she felt that the project was an improvement and was in
compliance with the Master Plan.
20 minutes
3. A request for review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -713-7, Major Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the addition of GRFA (Rucksack Building),
located at 288 Bridge Street, Unit R -2 /1-ot D, Block 5, Vail Village Filing , and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC110045)
Applicant: Margo Mullally, represented by Mark Donaldson
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 6 -0 -1 (Pierce recused)
1. The applicant shall pay an employee housing fee -in -lieu per Chapter 12 -24, Inclusionary
Zoning, Vail Town Code.
2. This approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail design
review approval for this proposal.
Bill Pierce recused himself from items 3 and 4 and he is currently involved in litigation regarding this
project.
Rachel Dimond made a presentation per the Staff memorandum describing the requests for both
units as they are integrally related.
Mark Donaldson, representing the applicant, made a presentation on the requests. He stated that
his presentation would focus on the expansion of the fifth floor on the south side of the tower where
there is no support from Staff for the addition. He also responded to Mr. Dunkleman's letter which
expressed some concerns from owners in the A &D Building to the north.
Commissioner Kurz stated that he benefitted from the clarity around at he addition to the south side
of the tower. He felt that the proposal made the best use of some difficult space.
Commissioners Cartin and Hopkins agreed with Commissioner Kurz.
Paul Dunkleman, representing the neighboring A &D Building, went through their concerns including
railing height and a potential hot tub adjacent to his client's property.
Commissioner Rediker asked Mr. Dunkleman to clarify his concern regarding the deck railings and
whether the issues were related to views.
Mr. Dunkleman stated there are no views from his clients' windows but was concerned that the
railing be high enough to prevent falling.
Page 3
Mark Donaldson clarified that the railing would be a solid wall so as to not create a ladder effect for
children to climb over.
Margo Mullalaly stated that their family is very quiet and just wants to improve their property.
20 minutes
4. A request for the review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -713-7, Major Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for additions of enclosed floor area, a request
for the review of a variance, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, from Section
12- 14 -17, Setback from Watercourse, Vail Town Code, to allow for encroachments into the Mill
Creek setback and a request for the review of a variance, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances,
Vail Town Code, from Section 12- 713-15, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, to allow for additions of
enclosed floor area in excess of allowable site coverage, located at 288 Bridge Street, Unit R -1
(Rucksack Building)/ Part of Lots C & D, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC110046, PEC110050)
Applicant: William Gardiner, represented by Victor Mark Donaldson Architects
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 6 -0 -1 (Pierce recused)
1. The applicant shall pay an employee housing fee -in -lieu per Chapter 12 -24, Inclusionary
Zoning, Vail Town Code.
2. This approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail design
review approval for this proposal.
5 minutes
5. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations amendments,
pursuant to Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulations Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Sections 11 -7-
15, Public Parking and Loading Signs for Private Property, Vail Town Code, and 11 -7 -16,
Informational and Directional Sign for Public Parking on Private Property, Vail Town Code, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110021)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to September 12, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 7 -0 -0
5 minutes
6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments to
Chapter 12 -15, Gross Residential Floor Area, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7,
Amendment, Vail Town Code, related to the calculation of gross residential floor area on the lowest
level of a structure that contains a garage in the Hillside Residential, Single - Family Residential, Two -
Family Residential, and Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential Districts, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC110043)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to September 12, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 7 -0 -0
5 minutes
7. A request for the review of a variance, pursuant to Section 14 -1 -5, Variances, Vail Town Code, from
Section 14 -10 -5, Building Materials and Design, Vail Town Code, to allow for the installation of solar
panels extending higher than one foot above the building ridgeline, located at 4918 Meadow Drive,
Unit A/Lot 16, Block 7, Bighorn Subdivision Fifth Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC100046)
Applicant: Warren Dean, represented by Capitol Solar Energy
Planner: Rachel Dimond
Page 4
E-3
0
10
ACTION: Table to September 12, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 7 -0 -0
5 minutes
A request for a work session on a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -71 -7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the area known as
"Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), with multiple mixed -use structures including but not limited to,
multiple - family dwelling units, fractional fee units, accommodation units, employee housing units,
office, and commercial /retail uses, located at 862, 923, 934, 953, and 1031 South Frontage Road
West, and the South Frontage Road West rig ht-of-way/U n platted (a complete legal description is
available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC080064)
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to November 28, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 7 -0 -0
5 minutes
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments to
Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail
Town Code, to establish a new zone district, Vail Village Townhouse (VVT) District, and setting forth
details in regard thereto; and a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on proposed
amendments to Chapter VII, Vail Village Sub - Areas, East Gore Creek Sub -Area ( #6), Vail Village
Master Plan, pursuant to Chapter VIII, Implementation and Amendment, Vail Village Master Plan, to
include recommendations related to a new Vail Village Townhouse (WT) District, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC110040, PEC110041)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to September 12, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 7 -0 -0
5 minutes
A request for the review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -7H -7, Major Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for additions to, and the exterior renovation of,
the Lion Square Lodge South, located at 660 West Lionshead Place /Lot 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1,
Addition 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110048)
Applicant: Lion Square Lodge South, represented by Bill Anderson
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Withdrawn
11. Approval of July 25, 2011 minutes
ACTION: Tabled to September 12, 2011
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 7 -0 -0
12. Information Update
• Discussion of the progression of Ever Vail and Timber Ridge redevelopment
13. Adjournment
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Schneidman VOTE: 6 -0 -0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information.
Page 5
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970)
479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published August 19, 2011, in the Vail Daily.
Page 6
Ad Name: 6986680A
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM
Sep[e 1:00Pm, 2011
1:OOpm
Your account 3
TOWN UNC ELL CHAMBERS
/PUBOLIC WELCOME
_
75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
_ -
minutes
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council for prescribed regulations amendments,
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
pursuant to Section 11 ail -3-3, To Prescribed Regula-
tions Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Sections
1 1 - 7 - 1 5 , Public Parking and Loading Signs for Pri-
vate Property, Vail Town Code, and 11 -7 -16, In-
formational and Directional Sign for Public Parking
STATE OF COLORADO }
on Private Property, Vail Town Code, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. n Code, an
Applicant: Town of Vail
j C`C`•
ss
Planner: Bill Gibson
J
ACTION:
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
MOTION: SECOND VOTE
Vail A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council on prescribed regulation amendments to
Chapter 12 -15, Gross Residential Floor Area, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amend -
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified
9 ant, Vail Town Code, related h the calculation of
residential floor area on the lowest level of
gross
structure that contains a garage in the Hillside
representative ofthe Vail Dally. Thatthe same Dally newspaper
Residential, Single - Family Residential, Two - Family
Y Y Y
Residential, and Two - Family Primary /Secondary
printed, in whole or in part and published in the County
9 rd theret Districts, and and jetting forth details in re-
and thereto. P 43
of Vail
Applicant: Town of Vail
of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
therein; that has been
5 minutes
said newspaper published continuous)
p Y
A request for the review of a variance, pursuant to
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
Section 14 -1 -5, Variances, Vail Town Code, from
Section 14 -10 -5, Building Materials and Design,
Vail Town Code, to allow for the installation of so-
more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first
lar panels extending higher than one foot above the
building ridgeline, located at 4918 Meadow Drive,
Unit A/Lot 16, Block 7, Bighorn Subdivision Fifth
ppublication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and
g
Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC )
that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice
Applicant: Warren Dean, represented by Capitol
Solar rner Rachel Dimond
and advertisement as requested.
ACTION
MOTION: SECOND VOTE:
5 minutes
A request for recommendation to the Vail Town
Council on prescribed scribed regulation amendments to
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium
Chapter 12 -6, Residential Districts, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment,
9
Vail Town Code, to establish a new zone district,
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Vail Village Townhouse (VVT) District, and setting
forth details in regard thereto; and a request for a
recommendation to the Vail Town Council on pro-
Rule
posed amendments to Chapter VII, Vail Village
provision.
Sub - Areas, East Gore Creek Sub -Area ( #6), Vail
Village Master Plan, pursuant to Chapter VIII, Im-
plementation and Amendment, Vail Village Master
Plan, to include recommendations related to a new
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
Vail Village Townhouse (VV T) District, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC 110040,
PEC110041)
published in the regular and entire issue of every
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
number of said daily newspaper for the period of I
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND:VOTE:
5 minutes
consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said
A request for a final recommendation to the Vail
Town Council for a major amendment to Special
Development District No. 29, Crossview, pursuant
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 9/9/2011 and
to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail
Town Code, to allow for the exchange of the
on -site employee housing unit (EHU) requirement
that the last dated 9/9/2011 in
in accordance with the provisions of Section
publication of said notice was
12 -13 -5, Employee Housing Unit Deed Restriction
the issue of said newspaper.
paper.
Exchange Program, Vail Town Code; located at
1460 Buff hr Creek Road, Unit G, /Lot G, Ridge at
Vail, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC110051)
Applicant: Craig B. Cohn and Sharon M.
Pucrynski
In I have here hand this day,
Planner: Rachel Dimond
witness whereof, unto set m Y Y
ACTION: Table to September 26, 2011
07(� /2,3/2,011.
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE :
5 minutes
A request for the review of variances from Section
11 -6 -3A, Business Identification Signs, and Section
11 -6 -3C, Menu Boxes, Vail Town Code, pursuant
to Chapter 11 -10, Variances, Vail Town Code, to
allow for the installation of a freestanding business
identification sign and a freestanding menu box,
located at 174 East Gore Creek Drive (Lodge at
Vail) /LotsA, B, and C, Blocks, Vail Village Filing 1,
and setting forth details in regard thereto.
General Manager /Publisher /Editor
(PEC110052)
Applicant: Lodge Properties, Inc, represented by
Graham Frank
Vail Daily
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Withdrawn
Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary in and for
5 minutes
A request for the review of variances from Section
public
12 -6D -6, S etbacks, end Section 12 -6D -9, Site
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 09/23 /2011.
n
Cover Vaarr for the
12-17, Vail Tow Code, pursuant to Chapter
iances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the
construction of a carport within the side setback in
excess of the allowable site coverage, located at
2586 Davos Trail /Lot 4, Block E, Vail des Schone
Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC110053)
Applicant: William R. Aylesworth, represented by
Steve Francis
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to September 26, 2011
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Approval of July 25 and August 22, 2011 minutes
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
My Commission expires: November 1, 2015
Information Update
Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the
proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend the project
orientation and the site visits that precede the
public hearing in the Town of Vail Community
Development Department. Please call (970)
479 -2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon
request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970)
479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for
information.
Community Development Department
Published September 9, 2011, in the Vail Daily.
(6986680)
Ad Name: 6936618A THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and
Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will
Your account 3 hold a public hearing in accordance with section
12 -3 -6, Vail Town Code, on September 12, 2011 at
1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in
consideration of:
A request for a final recommendation to the Vail
Town Council for a major amendment to Special
PROOF OF PUBLICATION Development District No. 29, Crossview, pursuant
to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail
Town Code, to allow for the exchange of the on-
site employee housing unit (EHU) requirement in
STATE OF COLORADO } accordance with the provisions of Section 12 -13 -5,
Employee Housing Unit Deed Restriction Ex-
1 ss
change Program, Vail Town Code; located at 1460
1
Buffehr Creek Road, Unit G, /Lot G, Ridge at Vail,
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC110051)
Applicant: Craig B. Cohn and Sharon M. Puczyns-
ki
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified
Planner: Rachel Dimond
representative ofthe Vail Daily. Thatthe same Daily newspaper
A request for the review of variances from Section
11 -6 -3A, Business Identification Signs, and Sec-
tion 11 -6 -3C, Menu Boxes, Vail Town Code, pur-
Printed, in whole or in art and published in the Count
part y
suant to Chapter 11 -10, Variances, Vail Town
of Eagle State of Colorado and has a general circulation
Code, to allow for the installation of a freestanding
business identification sign and a freestanding
box, located 174 East Gore Creek Drive
therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously
menu at
(Lodge at Vail) /Lots A, B, and C, Block 5, Vail Vil-
lage Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
thereto. (PEC110052)
Applicant: Lodge Properties, Inc, represented by
more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first
Graham Frank
Planner: Rachel Dimond
publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and
P g
A request for the review of variances from Section
that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice
P q g
12 -6D -6, Setbacks, and Section 12 -6D -9, Site
Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant Chapter
12 variances, Vail Town code, to for the
and advertisement as requested.
q
-17, allow
construction of ll carport within the side setback in
excess of the allowable site coverage, located at
2586 Davos Trail /Lot 4, Block E, Vail das Schone
Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium,
(PEC110053)
Applicant: William R. Aylesworth, represented by
Steve Francis
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Planner: Bill Gibson
Rule rOV1SlOri. The applications and information about the propos-
1� als are available for public inspection during office
hours at the Town of Vail Community Develop-
ment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend project orientation and the
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department.
published in the regular and entire issue of every Please call 970- 479 -2138 for additional informa-
tion.
number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 Sign language interpretation is available upon re-
quest, with 24 -hour notification. Please call
consecutive insertions; and that the first
P 970 - 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im-
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 8/26/2011 and paired, for information.
that the last publication of said notice was dated 8/26/2011 in (6936618)d August 26, 2011, in the Vail Daily.
the issue of said newspaper
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
09/01/2011.
General Manager /Publisher /Editor
Vail Daily
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 09/01/2011.
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public
My Commission expires: November 1, 2015