Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-0423 PECTOWN OF VA P� PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION April 23, 2012 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visit: 1. Habenicht Residence- 1622 Matterhorn Circle 15 minutes 1. A request for the review of variances from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a deck /car port within the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Circle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110057) Applicant: Florence Habenicht Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 90 minutes 2. A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -9C -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a public building and grounds, to allow for the redevelopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and office building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South Frontage Road West/ Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012) Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and Town of Vail, represented by Consilium Partners, Vail Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 5 minutes 3. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -16- 10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various improvements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession buildings, new covered outdoor terrace, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park entrance improvements, Betty Ford Alpine Garden welcome center, streetscape improvements, etc.) located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East/ Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120003) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Table to May 14, 2012 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Page 1 5 minutes 4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulations amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, to require restoration of watercourses and riparian areas, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120011) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Dimond ACTION: Table to May 14, 2012 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 5. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090028) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Dimond /Kristen Bertuglia ACTION: Table to June 11, 2012 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 6. Approval of April 9, 2012 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 7. Information Update 8. Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published April 20, 2012 in the Vail Daily. Page 2 TOWN OF 0) VAII ;' Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 23, 2012 SUBJECT: A request for the review of a variance from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a deck /carport within the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Circle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110057) Applicant Planner: SUMMARY Florence Habenicht Bill Gibson The applicant, Florence Habenicht, is requesting a variance from the setback standards of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District to allow for the construction of a new carport encroaching 8 feet into the 15 foot side setback area (i.e. located 7 feet from the property boundary). Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of this application subject to the findings noted in Section VIII of this memorandum. A vicinity map (Attachment A); the applicant's request, including photographs and architectural plans of both the existing and proposed conditions, (Attachment B); and correspondence from the adjacent property owner, Paul and Julia Mills, (Attachment C) have been attached for review. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variance from the 15 foot side setback standards of the Two - Family Primary/Secondary District to allow for the extension of an existing legally non - conforming deck by approximately two and one -half (2'/2) feet to the west. The proposed deck extension is intended to create a new carport below the deck. The proposed carport will accommodate a compact parking space (8 ft. x 16 ft.), rather than a full size interior parking space (9 ft. x 18 ft.). Since the proposed deck extension creates a carport; the entire structure is considered a carport, rather than a deck, for the purposes of calculating setbacks and site coverage. The proposed carport adds 139 sq. ft. of site coverage to the subject lot, which complies with the 20% site coverage limit of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. While the proposed carport has only three perimeter walls, the perimeter of the carport is less than 25% open and is therefore defined as gross residential floor area (GRFA). Since the proposed carport is defined as GRFA, the carport is considered a garage for the purposes of calculating GRFA. Since the carport is a garage, the carport is subject to the GRFA garage deduction provisions of Section 12 -15 -3: (GRFA) Definition, Calculation, and Exclusion, Vail Town Code. Since the new GRFA create by the carport is deducted as a garage, there is no net change to the existing GRFA calculations for this lot. III. BACKGROUND The Matterhorn Village subdivision was platted under Eagle County jurisdiction in 1963. Throughout the 1960's and 1970's, properties within the Matterhorn neighborhood, including the subject property, were reconfigured by splitting lots into portions and then recombining those portion into new lots. The subject property, Lot 25 -B, consists of the eastern portion of the former Lot 25 and western portion of the former Lot 27. The applicant purchased the subject property in 1970 and obtained building permits for the existing structure from the Eagle County Building Division beginning in 1978. A Temporary Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the existing structure by the Eagle County Building Division on March 26, 1980. The Matterhorn neighborhood, including the subject property, was annexed into the Town of Vail on July 11, 1980, upon the Town Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 15, 1979. The subject property was subsequently zoned to the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. The subject property is legally non - conforming ( "grandfathered ") in regard to both the lot area /site dimensions and setbacks standards of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. On October 4, 1989, the Town of Vail Building Department issued a final Certificate of Occupancy for the subject residence. In October 2011, the Town of Vail Building Department issued a Stop Work Order for deck construction occurring at the subject property without design review or building permit approvals. The applicant is proposing this variance request in part to remedy the construction that occurred without permits. IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff believes that the following provisions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to the review of this proposal: Town of Vail Page 2 Zoning Regulations (Title 12) Chapter 12 -1: TITLE, PURPOSE, AND APPLICABILITY (in part) Section 12 -1 -2: Purpose A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town, and to promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. B. Specific: These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific purposes: 1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. 2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other dangerous conditions. 3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets. 4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off street parking and loading facilities. 5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic values. 6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal development objectives. 7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures. 8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the town. 9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable natural features. 10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters. 11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. ARTICLE 12 -6D: TWO FAMILY PRIMARY /SECONDARY DISTRICT (in part) 12 -6D -1 Purpose: Town of Vail Page 3 The two - family primary/secondary residential district is intended to provide sites for single - family residential uses or two - family residential uses in which one unit is a larger primary residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment, together with such public facilities as may appropriately be located in the same zone district. The two - family primary/secondary residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single - family and two - family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site development standards 12 -6D -5: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15, 000) square feet of buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30). Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eighty feet (80) on each side, within its boundaries. 12 -6D -6: Setbacks: In the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15), and the minimum rear setback shall be fifteen feet (15'). Chapter 12 -17: VARIANCES (in part) 12 -17 -1: Purpose: Reasons for Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. Development Standards (Title 14) 14 -10 -4: ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS, DECKS, BALCONIES, STEPS, BAY WINDOWS, ETC. (in part) C. Balconies, decks, terraces, and other similar unroofed features projecting from a structure at a height of more than five feet (5) above ground level may project not more than five feet (5) nor more than one -half (112) the minimum required dimension into a required setback area, or may project not more than five feet (5) nor more than one - fourth (114) the minimum required dimension into a required distance between buildings. A balcony or deck projecting from a higher elevation may extend over a lower balcony or deck but in such case shall not be deemed a roof for the lower balcony or deck. V. SITE ANALYSIS Town of Vail Page 4 VI. Address: 1622 Matterhorn Circle Legal Description: Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village Lot Area: 9,975 sq. ft. (0.229 acres) Zoning: Two - Family Primary/Secondary District Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential Geological Hazards: None Development Standard Allowed /Required Existing Proposed Setbacks (ft): Front 20 33 Zoning 30 East Side 15 15 no change West Side 15 13 7 Rear 15 95 Two - Family Primary/Secondary District no change Dwelling Units 1 2 no change GRFA (sq.ft.): 4,589 2,140 no change* Site Coverage (sq.ft.): 1,995(20%) 1,100(11%) 1,239(12%) Landscape Area (sq.ft.): 5,985(60%) Parking (spaces): Lower Unit: 2 Upper Unit: 2 7,400 + /- (74 %) ** 7,261+/- (73 %) 2 (0 enclosed) no change 2 (0 enclosed) 3 (1 enclosed) * While the carport has only three perimeter walls, said perimeter is less than 25% open; so the carport is defined as a garage. The proposed carport results in no net change to the existing GRFA calculations due to the garage area deduction provisions of Section 12 -15 -3: (GRFA) Definition, Calculation, and Exclusion, Vail Town Code. ** The boundaries of the existing gravel driveway and parking area are nondescript, so area calculations are approximate. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING VII. REVIEW CRITERIA Town of Vail Page 5 Land Use Zoning North: Donovan Park General Use District South: Residential Two - Family Primary/Secondary District East: Residential Two - Family Primary/Secondary District West: Residential Two - Family Primary/Secondary District VII. REVIEW CRITERIA Town of Vail Page 5 The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code. 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The subject property is legally non - conforming ( "grandfathered ") in regard to the lot size and site dimension standards of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. The Two - Family Primary /Secondary District requires a minimum lot area of 15,000 sq. ft. of buildable area; however, the existing lot is 9,975 sq. ft. in total size. Additionally, the standards of this district require lot dimensions that can accommodate an 80 foot by 80 foot square; however, the existing lot is only 58 feet wide. The subject property is also legally non - conforming in regard to the setback standards of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. The Two - Family Primary /Secondary District requires side setbacks of 15 feet; however, the southwest corner of the existing house is located within 13 feet of the western property boundary. Second story decks may encroach 5 feet into the required 15 foot setback (i.e. a 10 foot deck setback) pursuant to Section 14 -10 -4: Architectural Projections, Decks, Balconies, Steps, Bay Windows, Etc., Vail Town Code. However, the southwest corner of the existing second story deck is located within 9 feet of the western property boundary. Due to the legally non - conforming conditions of the subject lot and structure, Staff does not believe the proposed variance will have a significant negative affect on the existing and potential use and structures in the vicinity in comparison to existing conditions. The applicant has obtained utility company approvals for the proposed carport; therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed variance will negatively affect the utility easement located along the western property boundary of this lot. The neighboring property owners, Paul and Julia Mills, located adjacent to the proposed carport have submitted a letter of support for the applicant's setback variance request (Attachment C). 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. The applicant is proposing to construct a new carport to accommodate a compact parking space (8 ft. x 16 ft.), rather than a full size parking space (9 ft. x 18 ft.). 8 ft. x 16 ft. are the smallest parking space dimensions permitted by the Vail Town Code. Pursuant to Section 14 -10 -6: Residential Development, Vail Town Code, dwelling units and garages (carports) must be designed within a single structure. The applicant is proposing to construct a new carport connected to the western side of the existing house. While this carport addition encroaches into the western side setback, a similar Town of Vail Page 6 garage or carport addition to the front or eastern sides of the existing house would also encroach into the required setback areas. Therefore, Staff believes the applicant is requesting the minimum degree of relief necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among other properties within the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. The subject property was subdivided under Eagle County jurisdiction prior to being annexed into the Town of Vail. The subject lot is legally nonconforming in regard to the lot area and site dimensions standards of the Two - Family Primary/Secondary District. Additionally, the subject existing house was constructed without a garage under Eagle County jurisdiction and later annexed into the Town of Vail and is currently legally non- conforming in regard to the side setback requirements of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. The Town of Vail has a long- standing policy of promoting the construction of enclosed, off - street parking on private property. The Planning and Environmental Commission has approved numerous other variances from setbacks, site coverage, and other similar development standards to facilitate the construction of garages (carports). Therefore, Staff does not view the approval of this variance request as a grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The proposed carport will create an additional parking space on the subject property, which further reduces the on- street parking demands of the subject property. Staff believes this will positively impact transportation and traffic facilities and public safety. The applicant has obtained utility company approvals for the proposed carport; therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed variance will negatively affect the utility easement located along the western property boundary of this lot. Staff does not believe the requested variance will have a negative affect on light and air or the distribution of population in comparison to the existing conditions. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. VIII. RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of this request for a variance from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a deck /car port within the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Circle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Staff's recommendation is based upon the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Town of Vail Page 7 Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request for a variance from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a deck/carport within the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Circle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission imposes the following conditions: "1. Approval of this variance is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval of the associated design review application." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve these variance requests, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: 'Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section Vll of the Staff memorandums to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 23, 2012, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two - Family Primary/Secondary District. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that does not apply generally to other properties in the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. Town of Vail Page 8 c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District." IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Applicant's Request C. Adjacent Property Owner Correspondence Town of Vail Page 9 Matterhorn Village Filing I Lot 25B (9622 Matterhorn Circle) 1 Subject Property e This map vas created by the T.— of Vail GG Teem. Use of this map should be for general Purposes only. The T.— of Vail does not warrant the acwreoy oit e information — tamed be,— Feet here Stogyn, parcel line v kIs approximate) 0 50 100 200 Last Modified. November 14, 2011 TOR OF V R 1622 MATTERHORN CIRCLE SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST MARCH 26, 2011 The setback variance requested is located in the original Matterhorn Circle neighborhood. The original houses on the Circle were built in the 1960's. Subsequent divisions of lots, with some portions added to other lots, have created irregularly- shaped building sites. Homes to the east and west of 1622 Matterhorn Circle (as an example, 1672 Matterhorn Circle in relation to 1652 Matterhorn Circle) have building footprints encroaching into setbacks and easements, as proscribed by current TOV guidelines, but have been grandfathered into compliance. In some cases existing easements have actually been erased by Eagle County. When standing on Gore Creek looking south toward the lower Matterhorn Circle properties, one sees a tight, but fairly well- organized, rhythm of buildings and open space into which the new deck extension on 1622 Matterhorn Circle fits well visually The deck on 1622 Matterhorn Circle is in need of reconstruction. The extension of the deck by approximately 2.5 feet to the west addresses this issue, leaving approximately 6 feet of naturally - landscaped space along the western edge of the 1622 property line. Previously access to the upstairs living area was via a stairway at the front (streetside) of the house. Currently the only access to the upper living area is via a back stair leading directly into a bedroom. Flo Habenicht, the owner of 1622 Matterhorn Circle, requests permission to maintain the extension of her deck as newly constructed, as well as the re- construction of the front entry stair leading to her front door and foyer. The 2.5 -foot extension of the deck does not affect either the view corridor between houses or the sunlight that reaches the east side of 1632 Matterhorn Circle. It also enables the sheltering of one car, facilitating snow removal. The integration of parking and house at 1622 is human - scaled and aesthetically - pleasing, eliminating one car year -round from the street edge where a number of cars already line the front of the homes. The addition is an excellent precedent for the future of the neighborhood. Happily, there is no objection by either immediate or surrounding neighbors to the small variance from the original footprint of 1622 Matterhorn Circle. On the contrary, the new deck and shelter underneath, as planned, is considered to be a great improvement to the character of the neighborhood by the residents. MP��ERNORN i�, — 04'36'03" R = 475.00' T = 19.08' L = 38.14' CHB = N73'00'007 "E 38.12' = 02'24'42" R = 475.00' T = 10.00' L = 20.00' CHB = N70'35'22 "W 19.99' liz GRAyEL\ PARKING \ tee\ \ 1ST FLOOR MASONRY S V\ 0 2ND FLOOR WOOD GRAPHIC SCALE o r. se ( IN ETl1 ) 1 Inch - 30 it \� *'OW '\ ,-0 IMPR 0 VEMENT L 0 CA TION CERTIFICATE e \� LOT 27 a DECK \ p P Ovrn.ad \� Porar Line,\ , 6� LOT 25 Par «\"` �. C\ �,5' LOT 25 \`^: LOT\27 NOTES: 1) Street Address: 1622 Matterhorn Circle 2) The legal description, deed lines and record easement information are based upon ALTA Title Commitment Application No. EL1302E -1 furnished by Title Americo of Eagle County dated September 24, 1992 and the Map of Matterhorn Village Filing No.1 as recorded in Eagle County Records November 20. 1963. 3) Improvement locations are based upon the monuments shown hereon being rebor and survey cap P.L.S. No. 4551 used for a survey by Johnson and Kunkel In April 1980. 4) According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 080054 0002 C revised May 1, 1985, the property shown hereon Is located in Zone C. an area of minimal flooding. i tt ° N 6�09�2 LOT 28 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF LOT 25, MATTERHORN VILLAGE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 25 WHICH IS COMMON TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 27 AND IS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 25 AND 27 A DISTANCE OF 170.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 25, COMMON WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER. OF LOT 27. THENCE S 62' 19'12" W ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 25 A DISTANCE OF 38.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 28'08'27' W A DISTANCE OF 175.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 25. THENCE 38.14 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 475.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING N 73'00'07' E A DISTANCE OF 38.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THAT PART OF LOT 27, MATTERHORN VILLAGE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE LINE COMMON TO LOTS 25 AND 27 A DISTANCE OF 170.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 27 COMMON NTH THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 25. THENCE N 62'19'12" E ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 27 A DISTANCE OF 19.77 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT PART OF LOT 27 DESCRIBED IN A CORRECTION DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE 239 OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF EAGLE COUNTY, EAGLE COUNTY COURT HOUSE, EAGLE, COLORADO. THENCE N 28'15'39" W ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID CORRECTION DEED A DISTANCE OF 166.71 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID CORRECTION DEED AND THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 27. THENCE 20.00 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 475.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING S 70'35'22' W A DISTANCE OF 19.99 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE 1 hereby certify that this Improvement Location Certificate was prepared for Commercial Federal Mortgage Corporation, Title America of Eagle County and Florence J. Hobenicht. THAT THIS IS NOT A LAND SURVEY PLAT OR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, and that this is not to be relied upon for the establishment of fences, buildings or other future improvement lines. I further certify that the Improvements on the above described parcel on this date. December 17, 1992, except utility connections are entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, except as shown, that there are no encroachments upon the described premises. except as Indicated, and that �[ �p� }p PPARENT evidence or sign of any easement 4crogeiA}�L4M"'�Jlb'Eht4 /�y part of said parcel, except as Indic \\\t�i\ \��>(t CyJ���l�' \ t� • e.0 +.► W. McAr,wP.L.S. 269V j� c jars, Kunk$�Afy�o�., In LL :✓ vU JJ � is ,we- i, %�� L AND NOTICE: Acccrding to Cal «ado law you MUST commence any legal ocit- based upon any defect N this survey clink, three years after first discovered such defect. In n, event may any action bated upon any defect In this survey be commenced more that ten yews from the date at the certification shorn hereon. Pin a c f . MATTERHORN CIRCLE (50') R.L.S. True Point of `�-- B Pin & L"' fd RLS .. ; 2 1" = 201 _ eginning , up A =20.00 ---» 4551 R= 475.00 C8= S70- 39'37''W p= 07.0447" CD = 58.10' L = 58.14' I w 0 II r — -I Wood Porch Deck (2nd Level) I i 26.00 -_I -- IG.37_ I 1 I � I I I — � 1st Floor I CA I I Masonary; I I 00 CA I o 0 `D I 00 2nd Floor I 0 C I L — - Wood cn Z N N 00 I Co Co I 18_35' _ U- 13.26 26.00 IL- - -- I to — J _ Dec—k (2nd Level) 0_ Part of I � LOT 25 I Part of I ILOT 27 I I I I lo' to I I I I I 38.00 Utility Easement 19.77 N 62° 19 12 E 57.77 SHT F' ^, 1 07 2 I N. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ❑ ❑ I � I � I I 1.37' � I❑ I I 7�5 I 4X4 P05T5 � I I z I 2X8 24" O.G. N Io 2.29 I I its I° � I I I I I I I 6,38' APPROVAL 51GNATURE & DATE COPYRIGHT O 2011 - DENVER KITCHEN COMPANY LLC - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENVER KITCHEN COMPANY LLC (�b� HAPENICHT RESIDENCE P.o.L3ox:zziz NEW DECK PROJECT DENVER, CO 80212 x, ;'rsrf�rirry� 1622 MATTERHORN CIRCLE 303- 477 -8777 PHONE 303 -477 -2777 FAX DenverKitchenCompany.com VAIL, COLORADO 61657 FILE #:1622_PECK_NEW 5GALE: NT5 SHEET 1 of 1 10/17/11 `�y ;gip .�'�5'� -gq•" :a.� � �� � �,y -tic r r \ \\ Xll s I is y - -, .•'' Iii IVA zCiL, Ile doo Noi7.:QA11( ARtA lop- I t "tvan DM11�[ JJJ"y� 74 4 O j1t� LOT '� v ►" = 201. and tnlaly EaNmtnl N 62 °19 12 E 57,77' ba'K CAN �c iorJ SCALE: APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY DATE: 3 �I lit z REVISED DRAWING NUMBER l �,22 VGA F- � N1 cle Pin a c `d. MAMATTERHORN R.L.S. Truk J, 8 CIRCLE (50') oatn"In0 R= 475.00 a =07 °0047" CB= S70°39`37 W Pin 9 �uP la. R.L.S. _ "' 0351 � = 58.14' CD ° 58.10' W u o I ' Deck (2nd Lirtl) I r Wood Porch 15.17 I I 1 _ I 1 ( I lot Floor — ( I J 1 Mo>ronary; u kv N 6 o? I 8 2nd Floor L _ Wood I ~ N Go ( f X 0 Q m Co ,_ 0 m _ 26.00 J@s3 I L 1 ( I V t—C — — J o D. (2nd Levtt)I 0 I to Port of as +' LOT 25. Part of LOT 27 I ` I I � d and tnlaly EaNmtnl N 62 °19 12 E 57,77' ba'K CAN �c iorJ SCALE: APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY DATE: 3 �I lit z REVISED DRAWING NUMBER l �,22 VGA F- � N1 cle Tom' rd �' � ✓ «tit +�bY� ,t.r ��� � 1 _; � ��; ' ., �.� �4 d7►� �4_ � 'S � ! 115 74'1. �' ! �• ,� �� �� ���_ _ I f• 1 rL p d C �- Paul & Julia Mills 24535 Overtake Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630 October 24, 2011 Design Review Board Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Deck Expansion @ 1622 Matterhorn Circle To Whom It May Concern: We are writing this letter in support of Flo Habenicht's expansion of the existing deck on the west and north side of her home at 1622 Matterhorn Circle. We understand this expansion will require a variance from the Town of Vail. We are supportive of the expansion as currently detailed. We were in Vail recently, visited Flo's project, and discussed her plans with her. We underswd the expansion will encroach slightly on the property easement or set -back between her property at 1622 and our property at 1632. Given our visual inspection of her project and the tree line, which visually separates our two properties, we have no objection to expanding the existing deck. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact us. Very sincerely, Paul H Mills Julia L. Mills Mills Family Trust Property Owners: 1632 Matterhorn Circle, Vail, CO 81657 Home phone: 949- 768 -7126 Cell phone: 949 - 330 -3402 Cc, Flo Habenicht DV,6�i1353q 0) TOWN OF VAIL ' Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission /Design Review Board FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 23, 2012 SUBJECT: A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -9C -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a public building and grounds, to allow for the redevelopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and office building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South Frontage Road West /unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012) Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and Town of Vail, represented by Consilium Partners, Vail Planner: Warren Campbell I. SUMMARY The purpose of this joint work session meeting is to respond to questions raised at the April 9t" public hearing and to continue the presentation of information on the municipal site redevelopment project to the Planning and Environmental Commission. Information to be presented includes: • On site vehicular circulation Pedestrian circulation through the municipal building Program and use of areas within the municipal building and medical office building Staff and the applicant request the application be tabled to May 14, 2012. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST At the April 9, 2012, public hearing the following question was asked of staff: Will an environmental impact report be required in conjunction with this request pursuant to conditional use permit criterion six (6)? An environmental impact report will be required as it has been determined that the proposed redevelopment of the municipal site may have affects on one or more of the respects listed in Section 12 -12 -2, Applicability, Vail Town Code, below: An environmental impact report shall be submitted to the administrator for any project for which such a report is required by federal or state law, or for any project which the administrator determines may significantly change the environment, either during construction or on a continuing basis, in one or more of the following respects: A. Alters an ecological unit or land form, such as a ridgeline, saddle, draw, ravine, hillside, cliff, slope, creek, marsh, watercourse, or other natural landform feature. B. Directly or indirectly affects a wildlife habitat, feeding, or nesting ground. C. Alters or removes native grasses, trees, shrubs, or other vegetative cover. D. Affects the appearance or character of a significant scenic area or resource, or involves buildings or other structures that are of a size, bulk, or scale that would be in marked contrast to natural or existing urban features. E. Potentially results in avalanche, landslide, siltation, settlement, flood, or other land form change or hazard to health and safety. F. Discharges toxic or thermally abnormal substances, or involves use of herbicides or pesticides, or emits smoke, gas, steam, dust, or other particulate matter. G. Involves any process which results in odor that may be objectionable or damaging. H. Requires any waste treatment, cooling, or settlement pond, or requires transportation of solid or liquid wastes to a treatment or disposal site. I. Discharges significant volumes of solid or liquid wastes. J. Has the potential to strain the capacity of existing or planned sewage disposal, storm drainage, or other utility systems. Town of Vail Page 2 K. Involves any process which generates noise that may be offensive or damaging. L. Either displaces significant numbers of people or results in a significant increase in population. M. Preempts a site with potential recreational or open space value. N. Alters local traffic patterns or causes a significant increase in traffic volume or transit service needs. O. Is a part of a larger project which, at any future stage, may involve any of the impacts listed in this section. The municipal site redevelopment project is a partnership between the Town of Vail (ToV), the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC), the Steadman Clinic (SC), the Stead man- Philippon Research Institute (SPRI) and Howard Head Sports Medicine (HH) to construct a new municipal office building and a new medical office building on the Town's municipal office site in an effort to sustain and grow Vail's year -round economy. The proposal will redevelop approximately 1.33 acres of the 2.05 acre municipal site. According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail, the proposed development site is located within the General Use (GU) District. The redevelopment includes the following: • Two separate buildings (ToV municipal offices and MOB) to be constructed. • The medical office building (MOB) and the Town offices total approximately 76,551 square feet of gross building space. (MOB 55,551 sq. ft. & TOV 21,000 sq. ft.) • A new three to four story tall municipal office building and a four to five story tall MOB. • A +/ -220 space below grade parking garage would be constructed to accommodate the vehicle parking need an operated under a shared arrangement. • A shared loading and delivery site will be constructed to accommodate delivers and trash removal. • Pedestrian bridge over South Frontage Road to provide circulation between MOB and VVMC. • Helipad requires relocation at VVMC's expense. • Mitigation of development impacts is required (i.e., employee housing, traffic impact fee, art in public places, etc.). • Development application fees, building permit and plan review fees, and construction use tax payments are required. • ToV to receive payment for land cost ($5 million) with a closing in March 2013. Town of Vail Page 3 • MOB office space to be owned by SC (46 %) and VVMC (54 %). A portion of the office space is to be leased back to SPRI and HH. • The ToV municipal offices are displaced for the duration of the redevelopment project construction period ( +/- 21 months). • A total of 50 to 60 employees will be displaced during the construction period. • The continued operation of the police and emergency services dispatch departments. • Frontage Road median and turn lane improvements and other traffic circulation improvements consistent with the Vail Transportation Master Plan. • The relocation of the community recycling facilities to the RV lot at the Lionshead Parking structure. III. PROJECT GOALS A series of project goals have been recommended to provide direction on throughout the course of the entitlement and construction processes. On March 20th, the Vail Town Council adopted the following goals: • Design a new office building for the Vail community that is indicative of the Vail's brand, spirit & heritage • Design a new office building for the town of Vail municipal corporation which is highly functional, user - friendly, flexible & adaptable • Design an energy efficient, cost effective, building that is representative of the premiere international mountain resort community • Design a new building that integrates with the neighboring mob facility and is coordinated with the existing police department addition and all that carries with it • Design a building that ensures ease of access to local government through improved customer service capabilities and more efficient and productive consolidated operations • Design a building which optimizes workflow, improves the delivery of municipal government services and includes an increased presence and use of technology • Deliver a new home for the town's administration, community development, economic development, finance, human resources, informational technology, municipal court and police departments IV. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS Town of Vail Page 4 SECTION 12 -2 -2, DEFINITIONS FACILITIES, HEALTHCARE: A facility principally engaged in providing services for health maintenance, diagnosis or treatment of human diseases, pain, injury, deformity, or physical condition. ARTICLE 12 -9C. GENERAL USE (GU) DISTRICT 12 -9C -1: PURPOSE: The general use district is intended to provide sites for public and quasi - public uses which, because of their special characteristics, cannot be appropriately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other zoning districts, and for which development standards especially prescribed for each particular development proposal or project are necessary to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12 -1 -2 of this title and to provide for the public welfare. The general use district is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi - public uses permitted in the district are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other structures, to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of uses. 12 -9C -2: PERMITTED USES (in part): The following uses shall be permitted in the GU district: Communications antennas and appurtenant equipment. 12 -9C -3: CONDITIONAL USES: A. Generally: The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the GU district, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title: Healthcare facilities. Helipad for emergency and /or community use. Public buildings and grounds. Public parking structure. Public theaters, meeting rooms and convention facilities. Public tourist/guest service related facilities. Public unstructured parking. 12 -9C -5: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Town of Vail Page 5 A. Prescribed By Planning And Environmental Commission: In the general use district, development standards in each of the following categories shall be as Prescribed by the planning and environmental commission: 1. Lot area and site dimensions. 2. Setbacks. 3. Building height. 4. Density control. 5. Site coverage. 6. Landscaping and site development. 7. Parking and loading. B. Reviewed By Planning And Environmental Commission: Development standards shall be proposed by the applicant as a part of a conditional use permit application. Site specific development standards shall then be determined by the planning and environmental commission during the review of the conditional use request in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title. 12 -9C -6: ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Additional regulations pertaining to site development standards and the development of land in the general use district are found in chapter 14 of this title. VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria and factors for consideration for a request of a conditional use permit are established in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12 -16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code. A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the planning and environmental commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. Town of Vail Page 6 IX K14 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by chapter 12 of this title. B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of this title and the purposes of the zone district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title. SCHEDULE The development schedule milestones and durations are outlined below: • Execute the memorandum of understanding • Issue ToV Design RFP • Design Development • Final Legal Document Prep. (DA) • ToV Entitlement • Construction Documents (CD's) • Final CDOT Approval • ToV Office Relocation • Construction NEXT STEPS Jan. 17, 2012 Jan. 20, 2012 Feb. 2012 — May 2012 Feb. 2012 — May 2012 Apr. 2012 —July 2012 Aug. 2012 — Dec. 2012 Sept. 2012 — Apr. 2013 Apr. 2013 — Jan. 2015 May 2013 — Jan. 2015 Town of Vail Page 7 XI XII A series of next steps have been identified for the project. The identified next steps are intended to ensure the parties adhere to the project schedule. The next steps include: • Sign memorandum of understanding • Authorization to issue design RFP • Determine ToV development approach • Negotiate the Development Agreement • Finalize ToV program design • CDOT Meeting • Execute P &S agreement • PEC work session • PEC work session • PEC work session • PEC work session • CUP application submittal • PEC final review STAFF RECOMMENDATION Jan. 17, 2012 (done) Jan. 17, 2012 (done) Mar. 20, 2012 (done) Apr. 2012 Apr. 2012 Apr. 2012 Apr. 2012 Apr. 9,2012(done) Apr. 23, 2012 May 14, 2012 May 21, 2012 June 11, 2012 July 9, 2012 The Community Development Department requests the Planning and Environmental Commission tables this application to the May 14, 2012 meeting of the Planning and Environmental Commission. ATTACHMENTS A. Proposed conceptual plans, dated April 23, 2012 Town of Vail Page 8 F� V19". 4 SITE PLAN OVERVIEW • ` •� dp ov ?_ It. t Irz 4 -� K r . s _ —� . ip ar �illmilab�,17 Al m Ail - r. _ -Alm �- -16 . VL IF lctrr: -40 Ir rr � L+ MICHAEL GRAVES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP TOWN OF VAIL' 8, ASSOCIATES TOWN oFVaIL I oEC 2 . 23 APRIL 2012 SITE PLAN SHARED LOADING SHARED ACCESS h I I I I � I R - I ti� FR I I F � I F r/I�,o �F Np Rp WSJ 1 =- 4&0 � � SJ PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE � r EVERGREEN BUILDING VVM- C,PARKING STRUCTURE PROPOSE PEDESTRIA BRID E 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 VAILVALLEY MEDICAL \ 1 CENTER 1 FIRE TRUCK ACCESS TOV POLICE BUILDING Now f son woo A"!w r GE R v D �= o GERO �- RO SCORPIO 1 CONDOMINIUM 1 )S BANK 1 UILDING 1 \ \ SKAAL HAUS \ ,, IVAI ASSOCATES VA I L MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP & ASSOCIATES TOWN OF ARCHITECTS TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012 WES TBOVNo FR ONT AGE U`E MICHAEL GRAVES BmAS50GIATES VAIL MEC ; TOWN 1 ' ARGRITECTS.� TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 8, ASSOCIATES 0 MAI m " aTA 2 no, SITE DETAIL QUESTIONS FROM APRIL 9 PLANNING AND ENVIROMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING The following items represent questions or requests for additional information as a re- i sult of the April 9, 2012 Joint PEC / DRB Meeting. Items n G reen are or will be addressed in this meeting. The remainder are i in the upcoming application SITE PLANNING initial) n progress or will y addressed be addressed 1. Will the Hel*ipad be relocated and what is the future location 20 Has the group explored below grade access for pedestrian connection 30 How is the Site Accessed and what is the sense of arrival. ? 40 How is Loading and delivery accommodated on site?, 50 How many spaces will be available for grade parking? 60 How will building identity and signage be addressed on the site 79 Provide additional information for buildinq Site Coverage 80 West Meadow Drive Master Plan recommendations 90 Vision for the Grand Boulevard BOULDER: ES VA I L MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP • & ASSOCIATES TOWN OF VAIL.V VARGRITECTS.. TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012 TRAFFIC QUESTIONS FROM APRIL 9 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING 10. Provide a Traffic Impact Report at South Frontage Road intersecti on 11. What is the Level of Service?. 12. Provide a an exhibit of the VVMC traffic access plan 1310 For the VVMC Masterplan -What are the Traffic circulation patterns and future land u How do they impact the design TRANSPORTATION 14. Address the ECO bus stop location /operation /conflicts '�. Where will the Recycle Center be relocated,, BUILDING PLANNING 1610 Further describe the Pedestrian Bridge Connection to VVMC Why not take down the Police Building.? 18. Please describe uses inside the MOB DESIGN 19. Explain and Exhibit the Design compatibility between the two buildings misc 20. Address down valley competition and how we maintain our e dge BOULDER: ES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP TOWN I • VARGRITECTS.... TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012 TEMPORARY HELIPAD LOCATION "A COMPREHENSIVE COMPARISON OF POTENTIAL SITES WILL BE DISCUSSED AT THE APRIL 23, 2012 PEC MEETING 0 S MICHAEL GRAVES r",Ww- VAIL ME) TOWN OF VAIL' &ASSOCIATE 0 MA m " avA a we] 0 INTERNAL SITE /PEDESTRIAN ROUTES MAIN ROUTES o-_______________ WALKING /ROLLING TRANSFER FLOOR TO FLOOR VIA ELEVATOR o- ............... WALKING / ROLLING TRANS- FER FROM ELEVATORTO FINAL LOCATION MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING MUNICIPAL BUILDING MEZZANINE / LEVEI PLAZA LEVEL LEVEL P1 PARKING ARRIVAL AXONOMETRIC MICHAEL GRAVES 0 VAIL TOWN OF VAIL' &ASSOCIATES L � ITOWNOFVAIL :rAl m 11 XTA a we] 0 SITE ACCESS /TURNING MOVEMENTS 6SOCI i,, VAIL MEC MICHAEL GRAVES VARGRITECTS. AS50GIATES; i • • TOWN 1 . TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 :rAmplavAngs, 71 DEL TRA 1 t-% A r%IA 1 - / r%r'1 11 /r'r%\/ r%t -%/-1/ /'1 LOADING /TRASH REMOVAL AT MEZZANINE LEVEL OF MOB POTENTIAL LOADING /FED EX / UP DELIVERY AT POLICE ENTRANCE MICHAEL GRAVES TOWN OF VAIL' &ASSOCIATES MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL 2 / LEVE MEZZANINE / LEVEI VERY `K STOP law, ;l���L I LEVEL P1 LOADING AXONOMETRIC r. LOADING TRUCK PATH/ DELIVERY POINT o-_______________ TRANSFER FLOOR TO FLOOR VIA ELEVATOR o- ............... TRANSFER FROM ELEVATOR TO FINAL LOCATION MUNICIPAL BUILDING --m aft aft :rAl m 11 XTA a go] 0 LEVE 1 >� SECTION THRU TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING AND PARKING MICHAEL GRAVES TOWN OF 9VAIL't &ASSOCIATES L SURFACE AND SUBGRADE PARKING OPPORTUNITIES TOWN OF VAIL SURFACE /TUCK UNDER SPACES MEDICAL OFFICE TUCK UNDER SPACES [WA mrmutwIM��m��aTiaur Initial importance of the Existing Police Bu*i1d*ing, EXISITING POLICE BUILDING Contains CRITICAL AND RECENTLY INSTALLED Emergency functional items that would be difficult to TRANSFER /take offline at this time NEW Building systems are oversized and can be retooled to serve the proposed building Building is centra Portion of the Bu Ily ildina will be renovated ocated for access /visibility M BOULDER: ES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP 1 I TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012 I I I I I i i e 0 Site Site Area Site Coverage Medical Office Building Town of Vail Total Medical Office Building Town of Vail MICHAEL GRAVES TOWN OF VAIL' &ASSOCIATES Total Area Site Boundaries _ 24,700 sq ft 64,600 sq ft 89,300 sq ft 21,954 45,540 67, 494 RD1Fnr'-',*F- Percentage 87.82 70.50% 75.58% ffiE COVERAGE AT 75q W/0 UTILIZING RIGHT OF WAY Area To Frontage Road 30,747 sq ft 74,290 sq ft 105,037 sq ft 21,954 sq ft 45,540 sq ft 67,494 sq ft SITE COVERAGE go p,D GE �P RO N of _ Percentage r. 71%1 Notes ** *Includes area of the Existing Police Building to be Renovated 61%1 * "Includes area of the Existing Police Building to be Renovated 64°0 0 VA m " XTA a we] 0 8790_ \ \ SOUTH FRONTAGE RD WEST \ \ �- —x LIONHEAD INFO BOOTH # 0 n LIONHEAD PARKING STRUCTURE EAST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE _l I-- - �0 8185 — ds A,'' I _ \slao 8170 r NEW VAI�RECYCLING 9, >o 11 CENTER LOCATION .I / 81so� STAIRWAYS TO BE I RECONSTRUCTED AT A LATER TIME -8153 - v -8150 in � 14 l \ `8150 \ I ' s .2 l D VAIL INTERNATIONAL 6155 \_ DOBSON ICE ARENA PROPOSED RECYCLING CENTER SITE PLAN AT LIONSHEAD PARKING STRUCTURE PROPOSED RECYCLING CENTER POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE SLAB. 6" DEPTH. SEE DETAIL. INSTALL NEW 6' TALL WOODEN FENCE. ONE SIDED AROUND — RECYCLE CONTAINERS, TYP. PROVIDE SLEEVES FOR POSTS INSTALL NEW 6' TALL WOODEN FENCE. TWO SIDED ALONG PARKING LOT INSTALL (2) 6' SWING GATES FOR SNOW REMOVAL 0 54.0' 8.0' MIN. INSTALL NEW LIGHT I I FIXTURE /BASE I 1 I On O O 0 0-0 v�— —_ \ O n D Z D \ °m m p OOp ;am X� XO INSTALL NEW ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT FOR POWER TO COMPACTOR (208V) AND LIGHT FIXTURES INSTALL NEW LIGHT FIXTURES /BASES PROPOSED RECYCLING CENTER PLAN n O D c� O x � II / Ic Ioc ri / i / /ll II \ MAII /�/ �► ° I111� 1 11 876 (7 C0 n \ I ° 50% MIX OF 2" AND 7 GAL ASPEN OZ O o D 0 p I I ti'vj 11 �2 Dm c- II Z ° I D Z ;u Z mm m .Zm 6' 1p 1� III II \ 50% MIX OF BRISTLECONE AND CBS 70 I I �— 4' NATIVE CHOKECHERRY ® ® O I I D �I I► I II O l l III l l 111 � \ C3 II III \ 165_ / � INSTALL NE tN DRIP tRRIGATI0 1q � � — — � � TO-AtL NE w PLANTING -8160- a 0 PROPOSED RECYCLING CENTER LANDSCAPE PLAN ,•� ASSOCATES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP TOWN OF VAILt & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012 Occupant Overview /General Parking Per Code (511000, 411000) Parking per code with 20% Reduction Notes Net / Usable G ross PROJECT DENSITY F 7��man Clinic 34,950 sq ft inc below 165.1 Spaces 132 Spaces Partial Parking for Conf at 411000 F 7��man Philippon Research Institute 14,150 sq ft inc below 56.6 Spaces 45 Spaces Parking at 411000 ffng Lab -Suite 3,500 sq ft inc below 17.5 Spaces ffrd Head 6,500 sq ft inc below 32.5 Spaces 26 Spaces ffof Vail 18,000 sq ft21,00 0 sq ft 72 Spaces 58 Spaces Parking at 4/1000 Potential Expansion 4,500 sq ft5,00 0 sq ft Total Full Program Net/ Usable Gross Area Site Site Area Site Coverage Medical Office Building 59,100 sq ft Town of Vail 22,500 1 sq ft Total 81,600 sq ft Medical Office Building Town of Vail Total Area Site Boundaries Medical Office Building 24,700 sq ft Town of Vail 64,600 1 sq ft Total 89,300 sq ft Medical Office Building 21,954 Town of Vail 45,540 Total 67, 494 69,200 sq ft 26,000 sq ft 95,200 sq ft Percentage 87.82 70.50% 75.58°0 344 Spaces Area To Frontage Road 301747 sq ft 74,290 sq ft 105,037 sq ft 21,954 sq ft 45,540 sq ft 67,494 sq ft 261 Spaces Percentage 71% Notes 'Includes area of the Existing Police Building to be Renovated 61% 'Includes area of the Existing Police Building to be Renovated 64% BOULDER: ES VA I L MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP • & ASSOCIATES 0 1 I AA;CH,TEC *s' TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012 MUNCIPAL PROGRAM AREAS Town of Vail - Muncipal SPACE SUMMARY April 18, 2012 MICHAEL GRAVES �^ & ASSOCIATES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP TOWN OF VAIL.V F-A TOWN oFVaIL oEC 2 . 23 APRIL 2012 Staff Area Common Common -Office Function 4,139 Common - Council Function 3375 Common - Public Building (restrooms etc) 3,351 Common - Ammenities 972 Department Administration 61 i,ior, Community Development 13 1,939 Economic Development 3 Zii Finance ii 1,28o Human Resources 5 i,o96 IT 8 702_ Municipal Court 3 524 T otal PROGRAMMED USF 15,341 T otal CURRENT Area :L81692 Potential EXPANSION 5,000 MICHAEL GRAVES �^ & ASSOCIATES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP TOWN OF VAIL.V F-A TOWN oFVaIL oEC 2 . 23 APRIL 2012 m PUBLIC PLAZA b 1 C ONNMON ' omCi 1 GROUND LEVEL -TOWN HALL PARKING GAR.:GE _a. It CON.0ON omcf ' ONO 1 1 mo wlu. 1 / IT / SERVERS a� ■�aa i i ■ /i� ■1i ■>M PLMUC PATIO CASHIER / PUBLIC RECORDS ■ EXTERIOR ■ ■ TERRACE ■ (OPTIONAL) ■ CHAMBERS ■ ■ ■ ■ • t THIRD LEVEL -TOWN HALL 0 MICHAEL GRAVES TOWN OF VA 8, ASSOCIATES L cou+cx ass"ouT I 11! $ \0\\\\\\\ MTG MTG co"* OMCf MTG EXTERIOR TERRACE (OPTIONAL) 1 I 1 I f I 1 V WOEJ --o MUNICIPAL /TOWN HALL FLOOR PLANS I MIA Fl NANC E IT STAFF OWY HUMAN RESOURCE` Vbw ROL Mw Am' } MTG t co+r.ow offl(c. I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2ND LEVEL LEVEL - MUNICIPAL COMMON COUNCIL FLPMETIOM MEETING SPACE COMMON OFFICE COMMON COREISHELL VAIL MEC TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 AD MI14 ISTRATIO14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PMENT ECONOMIC a EVELOPMEMT FIMAMCE MTG MA m 11 avA a we] 0 MUNICIPAL COURT STAFF HUMAN RESOURCES IT AMU MICIPAL COURT AMMEMMIES PARK IMG MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING PROGRAM AREAS Occupied Space: Steadman Clinic - Doctor Offices - - 11,700 11,700 - 23,400 Steadman Clinic - Admin'. Flex &Other 567 - - - 311609 4,176 Steadman Clinic - MR1 Suite 3,304 - - - - 3,304 SPRI - Conference - - - - 111320 1,320 SPRI - Admin &Research - 6.1708 - - - 6,708 SPRI - Surgical Skills Lab - 2.1500 - - - 2,500 SPRI - Biomechanics Lab - 411000 - - - 4,000 Howard Head - - 4,263 4,263 - 8,526 Town of Vail - - - - - - Total Occupied SF 3.0871 13,208 15,963 15,963 4,929 53,934 Core &Common Elements: Corridors - - - - - - Penetrations &Core Elements - - - - - - Stairs &Elevators - - - - - - Lobby /Circulatiion /Core 2,465 2,339 1,658 1,658 1,868 9,988 Total Other Spaces 2,465 2,339 1,658 1,658 1,868 9,988 Total Above Grade SF 6,336 15,547 17,621 17,621 6,797 63,922 BOULDER: ES VA I L MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP • & ASSOCIATES 0 1 I AA;CH,TEC *s' TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012 LE LE LE LE LE BUILDING AXONOMETRIC -- PROJECT STACKING DIAGRAM PROGRAM 0 f MICHAEL GRAVES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP TOWN OF 9VAIL't 8, ASSOCIATES TOWN oFVaIL I oEC 2 . 23 APRIL 2012 Parking Lobby Loading Howard Head Imaging The Steadman Clinic Steadman Phillipon Research Institute Municipal Poilice Building (Existing) LANDSCAPE PLAZA THE FOLLOWING TOPICS WILL BE DISCUSSED AT THE APRIL 23 PEC MEETING VIA DIAGRAMS AND IMAGES PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE SPACE VISIBILITY: LANDMARK CONSISTENT WITH SITE AS A PRIMARY CIVIC DESTINATION? REFLECTION OF LOCAL CHARACTER: EMPHASIS ON LANDSCAPING WITH NATIVES? GATHERING PLACE: OUTDOOR SPACE TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY RANGE OF POSSIBLE USES • COMMUNITY EVENTS? • INFORMAL SEATING? • BUS STOP? • PRIMARILY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ft ACCESS? DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS AND FEATURES • PREDOMINANTLY HARDSCAPE OR PLANTING? • FORMAL /ORNAMENTAL V5. NATIVE /ALPINE/ • FOCAL LANDSCAPE FEATURE? • SHADE? • ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE? MICHAEL GRAVES TOWN OF VA &ASSOCIATES L ORGANIC? (£t MOB) r. FUNCTIONS? 0 MA m " avA a we] 0 / LANDSCAPE TOWN OF VA PEC Members Present Susan Bird Michael Kurz Pam Hopkins Bill Pierce Henry Pratt John Rediker PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION April 9, 2012 12:30pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 Members Absent Luke Cartin DRB Members Present Members Absent DuBois None Forstl Gillette Kjesbo Maio Lunch with Design Review Board 30 minutes A Joint work - session on the municipal site redevelopment Swearing in new members — Lorelei Donaldson 10 minutes PEC Chair ACTION: Pierce Chair MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 6 -0 -0 PEC Vice -Chair ACTION: Pratt Vice -Chair MOTION: Pierce SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 6 -0 -0 60 minutes A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -9C -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a public building and grounds, to allow for the redevelopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and office building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South Frontage Road West /unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012) Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and Town of Vail, represented by Consilium Partners, Vail Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to April 23, 2012 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 6 -0 -0 Warren Campbell presented the staff memorandum. Page 1 George Ruther, Community Development Department Director, presented the background and history of the proposed municipal site redevelopment project. Commissioner Rediker asked for clarification about the need for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Warren Campbell answered that an EIR is not anticipated at this time. Will Hentschel, Oz Architecture, Town of Vail's representative presented an overview of the proposed redevelopment project and the associated development standards. George Ruther clarified that the current development site consists of two lots, and there is no proposal to re- subdivide those existing lots. Commissioner Pierce asked for clarification about the proposed setbacks. Will Hentschel clarified. George Ruther and Mike Foster discussed the applicants' discussions with CDOT concerning construction proximity and logistics related to 1 -70, the South Frontage Road, and relocating the helipad. Mike Foster noted that the helipad is anticipated to be relocated to the east end of Ford Park. Commissioner Hopkins asked about impacts of this project on peak traffic times and impacts to the South Frontage Road. Mike Foster and George Ruther explained the considerations explored to date and noted that consultants are preparing a formal traffic study. Commission Kurz cautioned on the practicality of left turns exiting from the site at peak times. George Ruther noted how this proposal facilitates the redevelopment of the medical center facilities on the south side of the South Frontage Road and that the traffic study will include the anticipated redevelopment at the Vail Valley Medical Center. Commissioner Pierce asked about addressing current driveway access points conflicts. Commissioner Bird asked about the existing pedestrian cross -walk and identified the current conflicts with the ECO bus stop. Mike Foster noted that the pedestrian bridge is intended to improve pedestrian circulation across the road. Andy Forstl asked about a below grade pedestrian tunnel. Mike Foster and George Ruther identified the challenges associated with a tunnel and how a bridge could better facilitate redevelopment on the south side of the road. Commissioner Kurz asked if the TOV building would be filled by existing uses or if expansion would be possible. George Ruther clarified that little growth beyond current services could be accommodated at this time. He noted that spaces would be significantly more efficient that the existing office spaces. Page 2 Commissioner Kurz asked about the appearance of a campus or of two separate buildings George Ruther clarified that the two buildings will have separate architectural character, especially since the current police addition will not be demolished and must be integrated into the new municipal building addition. Commissioner Kurz asked how the medical center treats patients and how that affects the location of the helipad, especial is the longer distance to the helipad has patient treatment impacts. Mike Foster noted that the current location was supposed to be a one -year temporary solution back in 1983. He added that it is proposed to be temporarily relocated to Ford Park and the helipad is intended to be permanently relocated to the current hospital site. George Ruther noted that the sole intent of the helipad is for emergency situations and ultimately the helipad should be located on the roof of the hospital building. Commissioner Pierce noted the importance of the DRB addressing the lack of continuity of the three buildings (TOV, MOB, and hospital site). Tom DuBois expressed his support for having separate buildings and distinctive character. Brian Gillette agreed. Commissioner Pierce noted the DRB's general support for the design concept. George Ruther noted that all buildings in Vail must have general compatibility with their neighborhoods. Commission Peirce stated that there is not a strong need to have current police addition drive the architectural design of the new TOV building. Tom DuBois agreed and noted how it reduces the mass of the building and gives the appearance of additions over time. Brian Gillette agreed. Commissioner Rediker asked for clarification about the interior connection of town hall to the police addition. George Ruther explained the options being explored. Commissioner Rediker asked about the bulk and mass concerns of attaching a 3 to 4 story addition to the existing 2 story police addition. George Ruther explained the integrations issues being explored (consolidating mechanical and communication equipment, etc.). He explained the additional cost and parking demands associated with a fourth story to the new town hall building and when this issued will be addressed by the Town Council. Commissioner Rediker asked why the police addition is not being remodeled and if the town hall building and the police addition are considered one building. Page 3 George Ruther explained the reasoning for not demolishing the existing police addition. Commissioner Pierce noted that maintaining the police addition will help prevent the construction of a large municipal "monument" and helps maintain the current scale. He recommended the DRB review in detail the proposed sense of arrival and the appropriate architectural styling. He concluded by asking about loading and delivery. Will Hentschel and George Ruther described the proposed loading and delivery facilities, the site constraints, and the potential positive and negative effects of the options. Brian Gillette asked for clarification about the site entrance and parking location and usage. Will Hentschel, George Ruther, and Mike Foster described the operation of the parking structure. Commissioner Rediker asked about the parking management (paid or free parking, skier parking, enforcement, etc.) George Ruther identified that the Town Council will be discussing this topic at an upcoming public hearing and described the opportunities for non - business hour, alternative parking uses. Tom DuBois asked for clarification about patient access to the MOB. Mike Foster described the proposed arrival and access to the MOB. Tom DuBois cautioned against over signing the buildings. Commissioner Pierce asked for clarification of the proposed uses in the MOB. Mike Foster identified the anticipated users /businesses and described the building programming. Commissioner Pratt asked if the proposed building was designed to be five stories and built property line to property line. Mike Foster described the layout of the proposed MOB. Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowner Association, noted the Vail Transportation Master Plan recommends that hospital vehicular and pedestrian traffic be removed from West Meadow Drive. He noted that many past master plans for the hospital have not been implemented. He requested that the Vail Valley Medical Center provide their future plans during the review of this project. He disclosed that his wife owns a unit adjacent to the medical center. He noted that the medical center traffic and the trash /recycling center does not make for a good neighbor. He believes that the Vail Valley Medical Center future plans are not a separate project from this proposal and their future plans must be disclosed as part of this review. He recommended the TOV /MOB, Vail Valley Medical Center, and Evergreen Lodge redevelopments must be considered collectively, especially related to traffic and vehicle access. He asked for an example of other buildings in Vail that are comparable in size. George Ruther mentioned the US Bank building and the Tivoli Lodge as being similar in scale. Jim Lamont asked which development guidelines apply to the MOB /TOV redevelopment. Page 4 George Ruther clarified that the general, town -wide guidelines apply. The Vail Village and Lionshead guidelines would not apply. Brian Gillette asked for further clarification. He asked fi future access points would be addressed by the traffic study. Will Hentschel indicated, yes. Jim Lamont recommended that the traffic study address all the development sites (TOV /MOB, Vail Valley Medical Center, US Bank, and Evergreen Lodge) and the loading /delivery associated with all the sites. He requested that the traffic report analyze a possible round -a -bout in depth and not only at a conceptual level. He noted his concerns about the frequency and intent of the helipad use. He recommended the helicopter arrives only on demand, and does not recommend that helicopters fly in every morning and then fly out every evening. Commissioner Bird disagreed that having helicopters only fly in from down valley when called takes too much time for patient needs. Jim Lamont recommended that the FAA be contacted regarding regulations and that controls needed to be put in place to ensure that flights are only for emergency use and not elective treatments. Jim Lamont asked if the MOB /TOV site would be part of a Urban Renewal District, or other similar designation. George Ruther answered, not at this time; but the design team is looking into all the financing options. Jim Lamont noted that the pedestrian bridge may need to be a more grand vision. He recommended exploring a cut - and -cover design concept similar to proposal to bury 1 -70 /frontage roads and the Vail Pass wildlife bridges. This could provide additional usable space and future uses. Gwen Scapello noted her support of Mr. Lamont's questions. She asked if the MOB is designed with room for expansion and growth. She asked if years in the future the Town would need to again relocate to accommodate future MOB growth. George Ruther identified how after economic /business analysis the MOB has been scaled back from their initial design for a large proposed building. Gwen Scapello asked about the potential re- purposing MOB building if the tenants move down valley or out of Vail in the future. George Ruther described the Town Council and medical center discussions on this topic. He described the investments being made by the applicants and the long term benefits to the medical center. He noted that the future potential uses on the property would be determined by the General Use District. The Town Council chose not to place further use restrictions (such as private covenants) on the MOB site with the land sales agreement. Gwen Scapello asked for clarification on the proposed parking structure design. Will Hentschel clarified the design. Page 5 Gwen Scapello asked about the relocation of the community recycling center. George Ruther noted that the recycling center may be relocated to several Town owned lots. The most likely properties are the RV lot adjacent to the Lionshead Parking Structure and the Public Works Facility. He noted that the long term solution may be Town -wide curbside recycling. Commissioner Rediker asked about using the RV lot for helipad use. George Ruther noted the conflicts associated with the many vehicles. He noted that seven locations are being considered, but only two sites that meet all the site selection criteria: Ford Park and the Town of Vail snow dump at the Public Works facility. Brian Gillette noted that the farther the recycling in relocated from the main round -a -bout the less is will be used. George Ruther noted that one alternative consider were many remote locations, but there are impacts to that as well. Gwen Scapello noted the need for the RV lot. Jim Lamont asked if the MOB could be a stand -alone building. George Ruther and Will Hentschel described how the parking structure would need to be re- designed. Jim Lamont noted that long term the TOV site could be a future office building and town hall could be relocated to many alternative locations. He expressed the need to address Vail's "original sins" such as traffic and access issues related to the subject sites, Meadow Drive, RV lot, Dobson Ice Arena, the library, Evergreen Lodge, Vail International, etc. He cautioned about having a "Vail centric" view. He noted that the concern should not be about the medical center moving, but about a competitor starting down valley and those impacts to Vail and this medical center. He noted that Vail has grown into a city and we need to remain competitive. He noted that he supports this project, but only if it makes Vail's medical service more competitive. Commissioner Pierce expressed that traffic volumes, left turns, hospital access, etc. needs to be examined in more detail. What are the impacts if the hospital access is relocated across the street from this site in the future? Commissioner Kurz noted the concerns about timing around this project. He is not concerned about the threat of down valley competition. He disagrees with concerns about helicopter noise in exchange for saving a life. Commissioner Pratt believes there are traffic concerns regardless of the medical center, and all surrounding issues must be examined. Commissioner Kurz agrees with Mr. Pratt and recommends traffic master plan. Brian Gillette asked about the frontage road design and the location of future round -a- bouts. Commissioner Bird asked if the medical center was participating in exploring traffic solutions. George Ruther answered, yes. Page 6 15 minutes 2. A request for the review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the re- subdivision of Lots 2 and 3, Bighorn Subdivision 4t" Addition, located at 4316 and 4336 Streamside Circle West, and setting details in regards thereto. (PEC110063) Applicant: Diamond Assets, represented by Triumph Development Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approved with conditions MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 5 -1 -0 (Hopkins opposed) CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall add the following note to the plat: The addresses on this plat are for reference purposes only. Please refer to the Town of Vail for updated addressing information. 2. The applicant shall delete the administrator certificate from the plat. 3. The applicant shall ensure that the final plat does not render the existing legally non- conforming side setbacks more nonconforming. Bill Gibson made a presentation per the staff memorandum. Commissioner Rediker asked the purpose of moving the lot line. Mike Foster, applicant's representative, stated that the purpose of moving the lot line is to redistribute development potential for redevelopment. Commissioner Pierce stated the new property line seems more logical than the existing property line. He added that a non - conforming lot would not be created. Mike Foster noted that the new lot lines will not worsen the existing conditions. Commissioner Rediker asked what an 80'x 80' square represents. Bill Gibson stated that the Vail Town Code requires an 80' x 80' square fit into lots to provide a buildable lot. Commissioner Pierce asked for clarification on which lot lines exist and which lines are proposed. He amended his previous comments and noted that the existing lines are more logical than the proposed. Commissioner Pratt asked for clarification of distance between buildings and property lines. He added that it seems the setbacks seem to be reduced with the change in property lines. Bill Gibson stated that based on the criteria, Staff recommends approval and mentioned the Town Code has no requirement for straight property lines. Commissioner Hopkins asked which house would potentially be redeveloped. She also asked where a redeveloped house would be located on the lot. Mike Foster noted that a new house would need to comply with setbacks. Commissioner Hopkins added that with the proposed property lines better accommodate additions to the existing structures than the current lot lines. Page 7 30 minutes 3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for amendments to the Ford Park Management Plan, to allow for the construction of various improvements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession buildings, new covered outdoor terrace, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park entrance improvements, Betty Ford Alpine Garden welcome center, streetscape improvements, etc.) located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120006) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Recommendation of approval MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Bird VOTE: 5 -1 -0 (Pratt opposed) Bill Gibson presented the staff memorandum. Commissioner Pierce clarified that if there is any assurance of the Ford Park improvements. Bill Gibson stated that these are master plan recommendations and do not a project will be constructed as shown since these are illustrative plans and not construction drawings. Tom Braun, the applicant's representative, reviewed the revisions made to the proposed management plan amendments in response to the comments from Commission's last hearing including loading and delivery, pedestrian access and other issues outlined in the application material. Commissioner Kurz asked if access from the west end of Betty Ford Way would be closed and asked about feasibility of widening east Betty Ford Way. Todd Oppenheimer noted that the west access would continue to have gates, but should to be more closely controlled. He described the potential re- grading and retaining wall associated with upgrading the east access road. Commissioner Hopkins asked delivery vehicle traffic. Tom Braun provided details on the vision for future delivery vehicle access in the park. He added that a solution that is cost effective and workable will be found and then will be implemented. He added that a solution will be presented in the development application, and the master plan is a guide for future development. He said there is room to work and there is an opportunity to minimize trips through the west side of the park. He identified alternative traffic flow options that are still being considered. Tom Braun then described the proposed Betty Ford Alpine Garden's education building, and explained the reasoning for its location. He said the commissioners expressed interest in moving the future building to the east of the schoolhouse, but he said the west side was a better solution. Petro Campos of Zehren and Associates also addressed previous Commissioner comments about the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. He stated that putting the new education center to the east of the school house would displace the existing children's garden areas, which was very costly to build and would be difficult to relocate. The context of the views work best with the current proposal. He added that location as it relates to Betty Ford Way was a major factor in selecting the building location. He stated that there is a blue spruce along Betty Ford Way that marks the start of great views of Gore Creek. He explained the proposed location of the BFAG building and its relationship to other elements in the vicinity. Page 8 Commissioner Rediker asked Staff about Objective 1.3 (page 14) designating preservation zones. He is wondering if there has been any designation of preservation zones and if so, where they are. Tom Braun stated they are shown on the plan around Gore Creek and the Nature Center with dashed lines. Commissioner Rediker had noted his concerns about coal tar sealants at the previous Commission hearings. He identified the health and environmental risks and mentioned that these sealants have been banned by the State of Washington, Washington DC, Austin, TX, Madison, WI and Dane County, WI. He said these should sealants should be banned here in Vail. Todd Oppenheimer stated that these sealants are most commonly used on residential driveway and parking applications and that the Town of Vail does not use these materials to maintain roadways. Instead the Town of Vail either adds more asphalt, removes some top surface asphalt before adding more asphalt, or adds a chip seal over the road; but none of methods uses coal tar products. Commissioner Rediker stated he understands the need to expand the paths and roads in the park, but their proximity to the creek means the town needs to take care of the creek and make sure there is no toxins going into the creek. Todd Oppenheimer stated the Town will use all best management practices possible during construction. After the motion was made, Commissioner Pratt stated he is opposed to the storage building at the west end of the athletic fields and he doesn't think the recommendations for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens are fully resolved. 5 minutes 4. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -16- 10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various improvements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession buildings, new covered outdoor terrace, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park entrance improvements, Betty Ford Alpine Garden welcome center, streetscape improvements, etc.) located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120003) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Tabled to April 23, 2012 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 6 -0 -0 5 minutes 5. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090028) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Dimond /Kristen Bertuglia ACTION: Tabled to April 23, 2012 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 6-0-0 Page 9 6. Approval of March 26, 2012 minutes MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Hopkins 7. Information Update 8. Adjournment MOTION: Rediker SECOND: Hopkins VOTE: 5 -0 -1 (Bird abstained) VOTE: 6 -0 -0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published April 6, 2012, in the Vail Daily. Page 10 Ad Name: 7812036A PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM COMMISSION April O NCI CHAMBERS TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Your account number is: 1023233 /PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657 Vail Daily T MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Y Site Visit: 1. Habenicht Residence- 1622 Matterhorn Circle PROOF OF PUBLICATION 15 minutes 1.A request for the review of variances from Sec- tion 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant STATE OF COLORADO } to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a deck/car port within the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Cir- I SS cle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110057) COUNTY OF EAGLE } Applicant: Florence Habenicht Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: MOTION: SECOND:VOTE: I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper CONDITION(S): 90 minutes 2.A request for the review of conditional use per - mits, pursuant to Section 12 -9C -3, Conditional Us- in whole or in and in the County es, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a public building and grounds, to allow for the rede- printed, part published velopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a of Eagle, State of Colorado and has a general circulation g > > g medical research, rehabilitation, and office building and a municipal office building located at 75 and therein; that said newspaper has been published continuous) p y set South Frontage Road West/ U(PEC1ed, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012) and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Tri- umph Development and Town of Vail, represented more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first by Consilium Partners, Vail Planner: Warren Campbell of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and ACTION: MOTIOIN: SECOND:VOTE: publication that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice p q g 5 minutes 3.A request for the review of amendments to a and advertisement as requested. conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12- 16 -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various im- provements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium, fields, new restroom and concession buildings, new covered outdoor terrace, Gerald R. Ford Am- phitheater renovations, park entrance improve - only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home ments, Betty Ford Alpine Garden welcome center, streetscape improvements, etc.) located at 530, Rule rOV1SlOn. 1) 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East/ Unplat- ted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120003) Applicant: Town of Vail That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Table to May 14, 2012 published in the regular and entire issue of every MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5 minutes 4.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town number of said daily for the period of 1 Y I1 Council, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulations consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said I� amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 4/20/2012 and to require restoration of watercourses and riparian areas, and setting forth details in regard thereto. that the last publication of said notice was dated 4/20/2012 in (PEC120011) Applicant: Town of Vail the issue of said newspaper. Planner: Rachel Dimond ACTION: Table to May 14, 2012 MOTION: SECOND:VOTE: 5 minutes 5.A request for a final recommendation to the Vail In witness whereof, I have here unto set m hand this day, In Y a Y� Council for prescribed regulations amend- ments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, O5/O7/2012. Development Standards, Vail Town Code, pursu- ant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090028) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Dimond/Kristen Bertuglia ACTION: Table to June 11, 2012 General Manager /Publisher /Editor MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Vail Daily 6.Aroval of April MOTION: SECOND :VOTE: minutes Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for 7.Information Update the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 05/07/2012. 8.Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The applications and information about the propos- als are available for public inspection during regu- lar office hours at the Town of Vail Community y De- velopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. i The public is invited to attend the project orienta- tion and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Develop- Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public ment Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be re- lied upon to determine at what time the Planning My Commission November 1 2015 and Environmental Commission will consider an expires: item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional in- formation. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im- paired, for information. Community Development Department Published April 20, 2012 in the Vail Daily. (7812036) Ad Name: 7762511 A Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM Your account number is: 1023233 Vail Daily PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO } }SS. COUNTY OF EAGLE } I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice and advertisement as requested. The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium, only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 4/6/2012 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 4/6/2012 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 04/19/2012. General Manager /Publisher /Editor Vail Daily Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 04/19/2012. Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public My Commission expires: November 1, 2015 THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12 -3 -6, Vail Town Code, on April 23, 2012, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in con- sideration of: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulations amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, to require restoration of watercourses and riparian areas, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120011) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Dimond A request for the review of variances from Section 12 -613-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to al- low for the construction of a deck/car port within the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Circle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110057) Applicant: Florence Habenicht Planner: Bill Gibson The applications and information about the propos- als are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Develop- ment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend site visits. Please call 970 - 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon re- quest, with 24 -hour notification. Please call 970- 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im- paired, for information. Published April 6, 2012, in the Vail Daily. (7762511)