HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-0423 PECTOWN OF VA P� PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
April 23, 2012 at 1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visit:
1. Habenicht Residence- 1622 Matterhorn Circle
15 minutes
1. A request for the review of variances from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a
deck /car port within the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Circle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn
Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110057)
Applicant: Florence Habenicht
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
90 minutes
2. A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -9C -3, Conditional
Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a public building and grounds, to allow for the
redevelopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and
office building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South Frontage Road West/
Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012)
Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and Town of Vail, represented
by Consilium Partners, Vail
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
5 minutes
3. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -16-
10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various
improvements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession
buildings, new covered outdoor terrace, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park
entrance improvements, Betty Ford Alpine Garden welcome center, streetscape improvements,
etc.) located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East/ Unplatted, and setting forth details
in regard thereto. (PEC120003)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to May 14, 2012
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Page 1
5 minutes
4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7,
Amendment, Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulations amendments to Title 12, Zoning
Regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, to require restoration of
watercourses and riparian areas, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120011)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Table to May 14, 2012
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
5. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations
amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will
implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC090028)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond /Kristen Bertuglia
ACTION: Table to June 11, 2012
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
6. Approval of April 9, 2012 minutes
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
7. Information Update
8. Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning
and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please
call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published April 20, 2012 in the Vail Daily.
Page 2
TOWN OF
0) VAII ;'
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 23, 2012
SUBJECT: A request for the review of a variance from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for
the construction of a deck /carport within the side setback, located at 1622
Matterhorn Circle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC110057)
Applicant
Planner:
SUMMARY
Florence Habenicht
Bill Gibson
The applicant, Florence Habenicht, is requesting a variance from the setback standards
of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District to allow for the construction of a new
carport encroaching 8 feet into the 15 foot side setback area (i.e. located 7 feet from the
property boundary). Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of
this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community
Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of this application
subject to the findings noted in Section VIII of this memorandum.
A vicinity map (Attachment A); the applicant's request, including photographs and
architectural plans of both the existing and proposed conditions, (Attachment B); and
correspondence from the adjacent property owner, Paul and Julia Mills, (Attachment C)
have been attached for review.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a variance from the 15 foot side setback standards of the
Two - Family Primary/Secondary District to allow for the extension of an existing legally
non - conforming deck by approximately two and one -half (2'/2) feet to the west. The
proposed deck extension is intended to create a new carport below the deck. The
proposed carport will accommodate a compact parking space (8 ft. x 16 ft.), rather than
a full size interior parking space (9 ft. x 18 ft.).
Since the proposed deck extension creates a carport; the entire structure is considered
a carport, rather than a deck, for the purposes of calculating setbacks and site
coverage. The proposed carport adds 139 sq. ft. of site coverage to the subject lot,
which complies with the 20% site coverage limit of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary
District.
While the proposed carport has only three perimeter walls, the perimeter of the carport
is less than 25% open and is therefore defined as gross residential floor area (GRFA).
Since the proposed carport is defined as GRFA, the carport is considered a garage for
the purposes of calculating GRFA. Since the carport is a garage, the carport is subject
to the GRFA garage deduction provisions of Section 12 -15 -3: (GRFA) Definition,
Calculation, and Exclusion, Vail Town Code. Since the new GRFA create by the carport
is deducted as a garage, there is no net change to the existing GRFA calculations for
this lot.
III. BACKGROUND
The Matterhorn Village subdivision was platted under Eagle County jurisdiction in 1963.
Throughout the 1960's and 1970's, properties within the Matterhorn neighborhood,
including the subject property, were reconfigured by splitting lots into portions and then
recombining those portion into new lots. The subject property, Lot 25 -B, consists of the
eastern portion of the former Lot 25 and western portion of the former Lot 27.
The applicant purchased the subject property in 1970 and obtained building permits for
the existing structure from the Eagle County Building Division beginning in 1978. A
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the existing structure by the Eagle
County Building Division on March 26, 1980.
The Matterhorn neighborhood, including the subject property, was annexed into the
Town of Vail on July 11, 1980, upon the Town Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 15,
1979. The subject property was subsequently zoned to the Two - Family
Primary /Secondary District.
The subject property is legally non - conforming ( "grandfathered ") in regard to both the lot
area /site dimensions and setbacks standards of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary
District.
On October 4, 1989, the Town of Vail Building Department issued a final Certificate of
Occupancy for the subject residence.
In October 2011, the Town of Vail Building Department issued a Stop Work Order for
deck construction occurring at the subject property without design review or building
permit approvals. The applicant is proposing this variance request in part to remedy the
construction that occurred without permits.
IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff believes that the following provisions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to the
review of this proposal:
Town of Vail Page 2
Zoning Regulations (Title 12)
Chapter 12 -1: TITLE, PURPOSE, AND APPLICABILITY (in part)
Section 12 -1 -2: Purpose
A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health,
safety, morals, and general welfare of the town, and to promote the coordinated and
harmonious development of the town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its
natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community
of high quality.
B. Specific: These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific
purposes:
1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities.
2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other
dangerous conditions.
3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen
congestion in the streets.
4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off street parking and loading
facilities.
5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic values.
6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses,
consistent with municipal development objectives.
7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with
structures.
8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the town.
9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable
natural features.
10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and
facilities conducive to desired living quarters.
11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community.
ARTICLE 12 -6D: TWO FAMILY PRIMARY /SECONDARY DISTRICT (in part)
12 -6D -1 Purpose:
Town of Vail Page 3
The two - family primary/secondary residential district is intended to provide sites for
single - family residential uses or two - family residential uses in which one unit is a larger
primary residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment, together with
such public facilities as may appropriately be located in the same zone district. The two -
family primary/secondary residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air,
privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single - family and two -
family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by
establishing appropriate site development standards
12 -6D -5: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS:
The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15, 000) square feet of buildable
area, and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30). Each site shall be
of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eighty feet (80) on each side,
within its boundaries.
12 -6D -6: Setbacks:
In the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty
feet (20), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15), and the minimum rear
setback shall be fifteen feet (15').
Chapter 12 -17: VARIANCES (in part)
12 -17 -1: Purpose:
Reasons for Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties
and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as
would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain
regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may
result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures
thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity;
or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity.
Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation
shall not be a reason for granting a variance.
Development Standards (Title 14)
14 -10 -4: ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS, DECKS, BALCONIES, STEPS, BAY
WINDOWS, ETC. (in part)
C. Balconies, decks, terraces, and other similar unroofed features projecting from a
structure at a height of more than five feet (5) above ground level may project not more
than five feet (5) nor more than one -half (112) the minimum required dimension into a
required setback area, or may project not more than five feet (5) nor more than one -
fourth (114) the minimum required dimension into a required distance between buildings.
A balcony or deck projecting from a higher elevation may extend over a lower balcony
or deck but in such case shall not be deemed a roof for the lower balcony or deck.
V. SITE ANALYSIS
Town of Vail Page 4
VI.
Address:
1622 Matterhorn Circle
Legal Description:
Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village
Lot Area:
9,975 sq. ft. (0.229 acres)
Zoning:
Two - Family Primary/Secondary District
Land Use Designation:
Low Density Residential
Geological Hazards:
None
Development Standard
Allowed /Required Existing Proposed
Setbacks (ft):
Front 20
33
Zoning
30
East Side
15
15
no change
West Side
15
13
7
Rear 15
95
Two - Family Primary/Secondary District
no change
Dwelling Units
1
2
no change
GRFA (sq.ft.):
4,589
2,140
no change*
Site Coverage (sq.ft.):
1,995(20%)
1,100(11%)
1,239(12%)
Landscape Area (sq.ft.): 5,985(60%)
Parking (spaces):
Lower Unit: 2
Upper Unit: 2
7,400 + /- (74 %) ** 7,261+/- (73 %)
2 (0 enclosed) no change
2 (0 enclosed) 3 (1 enclosed)
* While the carport has only three perimeter walls, said perimeter is less than 25% open; so the
carport is defined as a garage. The proposed carport results in no net change to the existing
GRFA calculations due to the garage area deduction provisions of Section 12 -15 -3: (GRFA)
Definition, Calculation, and Exclusion, Vail Town Code.
** The boundaries of the existing gravel driveway and parking area are nondescript, so area
calculations are approximate.
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
Town of Vail
Page 5
Land Use
Zoning
North:
Donovan Park
General Use District
South:
Residential
Two - Family Primary/Secondary District
East:
Residential
Two - Family Primary/Secondary District
West:
Residential
Two - Family Primary/Secondary District
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
Town of Vail
Page 5
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 12 -17,
Variances, Vail Town Code.
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses
and structures in the vicinity.
The subject property is legally non - conforming ( "grandfathered ") in regard to the lot size
and site dimension standards of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. The Two -
Family Primary /Secondary District requires a minimum lot area of 15,000 sq. ft. of
buildable area; however, the existing lot is 9,975 sq. ft. in total size. Additionally, the
standards of this district require lot dimensions that can accommodate an 80 foot by 80
foot square; however, the existing lot is only 58 feet wide.
The subject property is also legally non - conforming in regard to the setback standards
of the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District. The Two - Family Primary /Secondary
District requires side setbacks of 15 feet; however, the southwest corner of the existing
house is located within 13 feet of the western property boundary. Second story decks
may encroach 5 feet into the required 15 foot setback (i.e. a 10 foot deck setback)
pursuant to Section 14 -10 -4: Architectural Projections, Decks, Balconies, Steps, Bay
Windows, Etc., Vail Town Code. However, the southwest corner of the existing second
story deck is located within 9 feet of the western property boundary.
Due to the legally non - conforming conditions of the subject lot and structure, Staff does
not believe the proposed variance will have a significant negative affect on the existing
and potential use and structures in the vicinity in comparison to existing conditions.
The applicant has obtained utility company approvals for the proposed carport;
therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed variance will negatively affect the utility
easement located along the western property boundary of this lot.
The neighboring property owners, Paul and Julia Mills, located adjacent to the proposed
carport have submitted a letter of support for the applicant's setback variance request
(Attachment C).
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and
uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of
this title without a grant of special privilege.
The applicant is proposing to construct a new carport to accommodate a compact
parking space (8 ft. x 16 ft.), rather than a full size parking space (9 ft. x 18 ft.). 8 ft. x
16 ft. are the smallest parking space dimensions permitted by the Vail Town Code.
Pursuant to Section 14 -10 -6: Residential Development, Vail Town Code, dwelling units
and garages (carports) must be designed within a single structure. The applicant is
proposing to construct a new carport connected to the western side of the existing
house. While this carport addition encroaches into the western side setback, a similar
Town of Vail Page 6
garage or carport addition to the front or eastern sides of the existing house would also
encroach into the required setback areas.
Therefore, Staff believes the applicant is requesting the minimum degree of relief
necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among other properties
within the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District.
The subject property was subdivided under Eagle County jurisdiction prior to being
annexed into the Town of Vail. The subject lot is legally nonconforming in regard to the
lot area and site dimensions standards of the Two - Family Primary/Secondary District.
Additionally, the subject existing house was constructed without a garage under Eagle
County jurisdiction and later annexed into the Town of Vail and is currently legally non-
conforming in regard to the side setback requirements of the Two - Family
Primary /Secondary District.
The Town of Vail has a long- standing policy of promoting the construction of enclosed,
off - street parking on private property. The Planning and Environmental Commission
has approved numerous other variances from setbacks, site coverage, and other similar
development standards to facilitate the construction of garages (carports). Therefore,
Staff does not view the approval of this variance request as a grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
The proposed carport will create an additional parking space on the subject property,
which further reduces the on- street parking demands of the subject property. Staff
believes this will positively impact transportation and traffic facilities and public safety.
The applicant has obtained utility company approvals for the proposed carport;
therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed variance will negatively affect the utility
easement located along the western property boundary of this lot.
Staff does not believe the requested variance will have a negative affect on light and air
or the distribution of population in comparison to the existing conditions.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the
proposed variance.
VIII. RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of
this request for a variance from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant
to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a deck /car
port within the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Circle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn
Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Staff's recommendation is based
upon the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and
testimony presented.
Town of Vail Page 7
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the following motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request
for a variance from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to
Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a
deck/carport within the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Circle /Lot 25B,
Matterhorn Village, and setting forth details in regard thereto."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this request,
the Community Development Department recommends the Commission imposes the
following conditions:
"1. Approval of this variance is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of
Vail approval of the associated design review application."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve these variance
requests, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission
makes the following findings:
'Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section Vll of the Staff
memorandums to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 23,
2012, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and
Environmental Commission finds:
1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two - Family
Primary/Secondary District.
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town
Code.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that does not apply generally to
other properties in the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District.
Town of Vail Page 8
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the Two - Family Primary /Secondary District."
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Applicant's Request
C. Adjacent Property Owner Correspondence
Town of Vail Page 9
Matterhorn Village Filing I
Lot 25B
(9622 Matterhorn Circle)
1 Subject Property
e This map vas created by the T.— of Vail GG Teem. Use of this map should be for general Purposes only. The T.— of Vail does not warrant the acwreoy oit e information — tamed be,—
Feet here Stogyn, parcel line v kIs approximate)
0 50 100 200 Last Modified. November 14, 2011 TOR OF V R
1622 MATTERHORN CIRCLE SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST
MARCH 26, 2011
The setback variance requested is located in the original Matterhorn Circle neighborhood. The
original houses on the Circle were built in the 1960's. Subsequent divisions of lots, with some
portions added to other lots, have created irregularly- shaped building sites. Homes to the east
and west of 1622 Matterhorn Circle (as an example, 1672 Matterhorn Circle in relation to 1652
Matterhorn Circle) have building footprints encroaching into setbacks and easements, as
proscribed by current TOV guidelines, but have been grandfathered into compliance. In some
cases existing easements have actually been erased by Eagle County.
When standing on Gore Creek looking south toward the lower Matterhorn Circle properties,
one sees a tight, but fairly well- organized, rhythm of buildings and open space into which the
new deck extension on 1622 Matterhorn Circle fits well visually
The deck on 1622 Matterhorn Circle is in need of reconstruction. The extension of the deck by
approximately 2.5 feet to the west addresses this issue, leaving approximately 6 feet of
naturally - landscaped space along the western edge of the 1622 property line. Previously access
to the upstairs living area was via a stairway at the front (streetside) of the house. Currently
the only access to the upper living area is via a back stair leading directly into a bedroom.
Flo Habenicht, the owner of 1622 Matterhorn Circle, requests permission to maintain the
extension of her deck as newly constructed, as well as the re- construction of the front entry
stair leading to her front door and foyer.
The 2.5 -foot extension of the deck does not affect either the view corridor between houses or
the sunlight that reaches the east side of 1632 Matterhorn Circle. It also enables the sheltering
of one car, facilitating snow removal. The integration of parking and house at 1622 is human -
scaled and aesthetically - pleasing, eliminating one car year -round from the street edge where a
number of cars already line the front of the homes. The addition is an excellent precedent for
the future of the neighborhood.
Happily, there is no objection by either immediate or surrounding neighbors to the small
variance from the original footprint of 1622 Matterhorn Circle. On the contrary, the new deck
and shelter underneath, as planned, is considered to be a great improvement to the character
of the neighborhood by the residents.
MP��ERNORN
i�, — 04'36'03"
R = 475.00'
T = 19.08'
L = 38.14'
CHB = N73'00'007 "E
38.12'
= 02'24'42"
R = 475.00'
T = 10.00'
L = 20.00'
CHB = N70'35'22 "W
19.99'
liz
GRAyEL\
PARKING
\
tee\
\
1ST FLOOR
MASONRY
S
V\ 0 2ND FLOOR
WOOD
GRAPHIC SCALE
o r. se
( IN ETl1 )
1 Inch - 30 it
\� *'OW
'\ ,-0
IMPR 0 VEMENT L 0 CA TION CERTIFICATE e
\� LOT 27
a
DECK \ p
P
Ovrn.ad \�
Porar Line,\ , 6�
LOT 25 Par «\"`
�.
C\
�,5' LOT 25 \`^:
LOT\27
NOTES:
1) Street Address: 1622 Matterhorn Circle
2) The legal description, deed lines and record easement
information are based upon ALTA Title Commitment
Application No. EL1302E -1 furnished by Title Americo
of Eagle County dated September 24, 1992 and the Map
of Matterhorn Village Filing No.1 as recorded in Eagle
County Records November 20. 1963.
3) Improvement locations are based upon the monuments shown
hereon being rebor and survey cap P.L.S. No. 4551 used for
a survey by Johnson and Kunkel In April 1980.
4) According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel
No. 080054 0002 C revised May 1, 1985, the property shown
hereon Is located in Zone C. an area of minimal flooding.
i tt
° N 6�09�2 LOT 28
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PART OF LOT 25, MATTERHORN VILLAGE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 25 WHICH IS COMMON TO
THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 27 AND IS THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 25 AND
27 A DISTANCE OF 170.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 25,
COMMON WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER. OF LOT 27. THENCE S 62'
19'12" W ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 25 A DISTANCE OF 38.00
FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 28'08'27' W A DISTANCE OF 175.14 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 25. THENCE 38.14 FEET
ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 475.00 FEET
AND A CHORD BEARING N 73'00'07' E A DISTANCE OF 38.12 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THAT PART OF LOT 27, MATTERHORN VILLAGE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY
ALONG THE LINE COMMON TO LOTS 25 AND 27 A DISTANCE OF 170.10 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 27 COMMON NTH THE SOUTHEASTERLY
CORNER OF LOT 25. THENCE N 62'19'12" E ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY
LINE OF LOT 27 A DISTANCE OF 19.77 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS THE
SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT PART OF LOT 27 DESCRIBED IN A
CORRECTION DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE 239 OF THE RECORDS OF
THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF EAGLE COUNTY, EAGLE COUNTY COURT HOUSE,
EAGLE, COLORADO. THENCE N 28'15'39" W ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY
LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID CORRECTION DEED A DISTANCE OF
166.71 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN
SAID CORRECTION DEED AND THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 27. THENCE
20.00 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
475.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING S 70'35'22' W A DISTANCE OF
19.99 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE
OF COLORADO.
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE
1 hereby certify that this Improvement Location Certificate
was prepared for Commercial Federal Mortgage Corporation, Title
America of Eagle County and Florence J. Hobenicht. THAT THIS
IS NOT A LAND SURVEY PLAT OR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT,
and that this is not to be relied upon for the establishment of
fences, buildings or other future improvement lines. I further
certify that the Improvements on the above described parcel on
this date. December 17, 1992, except utility connections are
entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, except as shown,
that there are no encroachments upon the described premises.
except as Indicated, and that �[ �p� }p PPARENT evidence or
sign of any easement 4crogeiA}�L4M"'�Jlb'Eht4 /�y part of said
parcel, except as Indic \\\t�i\ \��>(t CyJ���l�'
\ t� • e.0
+.► W. McAr,wP.L.S. 269V j� c
jars, Kunk$�Afy�o�., In
LL :✓ vU JJ �
is
,we-
i, %�� L AND
NOTICE: Acccrding to Cal «ado law you MUST commence any legal ocit-
based upon any defect N this survey clink, three years after
first discovered such defect. In n, event may any action bated upon
any defect In this survey be commenced more that ten yews from the
date at the certification shorn hereon.
Pin a c f . MATTERHORN CIRCLE (50')
R.L.S. True Point of
`�-- B Pin & L"' fd RLS
.. ; 2
1" = 201
_ eginning , up
A =20.00 ---» 4551
R= 475.00 C8= S70- 39'37''W
p= 07.0447" CD = 58.10'
L = 58.14' I w
0
II r — -I Wood Porch
Deck (2nd Level) I i
26.00 -_I
--
IG.37_ I 1 I
� I I
I — �
1st Floor I CA
I I Masonary;
I I 00
CA I o 0
`D I 00 2nd Floor I 0
C I L — - Wood
cn Z
N N
00 I Co
Co I 18_35' _ U-
13.26
26.00
IL- - -- I to
— J _
Dec—k (2nd Level) 0_
Part of
I �
LOT 25 I
Part of
I ILOT 27
I
I I
I lo'
to I
I I
I
I
38.00 Utility
Easement 19.77
N 62° 19 12 E 57.77
SHT F' ^, 1 07 2
I N.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— ❑ ❑
I �
I �
I I
1.37'
� I❑
I I
7�5 I
4X4 P05T5
� I
I z I 2X8 24" O.G.
N
Io 2.29
I
I
its
I°
� I
I I
I
I
I
I
6,38'
APPROVAL 51GNATURE & DATE COPYRIGHT O 2011 - DENVER KITCHEN COMPANY LLC - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
DENVER KITCHEN COMPANY LLC (�b� HAPENICHT RESIDENCE
P.o.L3ox:zziz NEW DECK PROJECT
DENVER, CO 80212
x, ;'rsrf�rirry� 1622 MATTERHORN CIRCLE
303- 477 -8777 PHONE
303 -477 -2777 FAX DenverKitchenCompany.com VAIL, COLORADO 61657
FILE #:1622_PECK_NEW 5GALE: NT5 SHEET 1 of 1 10/17/11
`�y ;gip .�'�5'� -gq•" :a.� � �� � �,y
-tic
r
r
\ \\ Xll s
I is
y -
-, .•'' Iii
IVA
zCiL,
Ile
doo
Noi7.:QA11( ARtA
lop-
I
t
"tvan DM11�[ JJJ"y�
74
4
O j1t�
LOT '� v
►" = 201.
and tnlaly EaNmtnl
N 62 °19 12 E 57,77'
ba'K CAN �c iorJ
SCALE: APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY
DATE: 3 �I lit z REVISED
DRAWING NUMBER
l �,22 VGA F- � N1 cle
Pin a c `d. MAMATTERHORN
R.L.S. Truk
J, 8
CIRCLE (50')
oatn"In0
R= 475.00 a
=07 °0047" CB= S70°39`37 W
Pin 9 �uP la. R.L.S.
_ "' 0351
� = 58.14' CD ° 58.10'
W
u
o
I
'
Deck (2nd Lirtl) I
r
Wood Porch
15.17
I I
1
_
I
1 ( I
lot Floor —
(
I
J
1 Mo>ronary;
u
kv
N
6
o?
I 8 2nd Floor
L _ Wood
I
~
N
Go
(
f
X
0
Q
m
Co
,_
0
m
_ 26.00 J@s3
I L
1 ( I V
t—C — — J o
D. (2nd Levtt)I 0
I
to
Port of
as
+'
LOT 25.
Part of
LOT
27
I `
I
I �
d
and tnlaly EaNmtnl
N 62 °19 12 E 57,77'
ba'K CAN �c iorJ
SCALE: APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY
DATE: 3 �I lit z REVISED
DRAWING NUMBER
l �,22 VGA F- � N1 cle
Tom'
rd
�' � ✓ «tit +�bY� ,t.r ��� � 1 _; � ��; ' .,
�.� �4 d7►� �4_ � 'S � ! 115 74'1. �' ! �• ,� �� �� ���_
_
I
f•
1
rL p d C �-
Paul & Julia Mills
24535 Overtake Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630
October 24, 2011
Design Review Board
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: Deck Expansion @ 1622 Matterhorn Circle
To Whom It May Concern:
We are writing this letter in support of Flo Habenicht's expansion of the existing deck on the west and
north side of her home at 1622 Matterhorn Circle. We understand this expansion will require a variance
from the Town of Vail. We are supportive of the expansion as currently detailed.
We were in Vail recently, visited Flo's project, and discussed her plans with her. We underswd the
expansion will encroach slightly on the property easement or set -back between her property at 1622 and
our property at 1632. Given our visual inspection of her project and the tree line, which visually separates
our two properties, we have no objection to expanding the existing deck.
Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact us.
Very sincerely,
Paul H Mills Julia L. Mills
Mills Family Trust Property Owners:
1632 Matterhorn Circle, Vail, CO 81657
Home phone: 949- 768 -7126
Cell phone: 949 - 330 -3402
Cc, Flo Habenicht
DV,6�i1353q
0) TOWN OF VAIL '
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission /Design Review Board
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 23, 2012
SUBJECT: A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section
12 -9C -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a
public building and grounds, to allow for the redevelopment of the Town of
Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and office
building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South
Frontage Road West /unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC120012)
Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and
Town of Vail, represented by Consilium Partners, Vail
Planner: Warren Campbell
I. SUMMARY
The purpose of this joint work session meeting is to respond to questions raised
at the April 9t" public hearing and to continue the presentation of information on
the municipal site redevelopment project to the Planning and Environmental
Commission. Information to be presented includes:
• On site vehicular circulation
Pedestrian circulation through the municipal building
Program and use of areas within the municipal building and medical
office building
Staff and the applicant request the application be tabled to May 14, 2012.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
At the April 9, 2012, public hearing the following question was asked of staff:
Will an environmental impact report be required in conjunction with this
request pursuant to conditional use permit criterion six (6)?
An environmental impact report will be required as it has been determined that
the proposed redevelopment of the municipal site may have affects on one or
more of the respects listed in Section 12 -12 -2, Applicability, Vail Town Code,
below:
An environmental impact report shall be submitted to the administrator for
any project for which such a report is required by federal or state law, or
for any project which the administrator determines may significantly
change the environment, either during construction or on a continuing
basis, in one or more of the following respects:
A. Alters an ecological unit or land form, such as a ridgeline, saddle, draw,
ravine, hillside, cliff, slope, creek, marsh, watercourse, or other natural
landform feature.
B. Directly or indirectly affects a wildlife habitat, feeding, or nesting
ground.
C. Alters or removes native grasses, trees, shrubs, or other vegetative
cover.
D. Affects the appearance or character of a significant scenic area or
resource, or involves buildings or other structures that are of a size, bulk,
or scale that would be in marked contrast to natural or existing urban
features.
E. Potentially results in avalanche, landslide, siltation, settlement, flood, or
other land form change or hazard to health and safety.
F. Discharges toxic or thermally abnormal substances, or involves use of
herbicides or pesticides, or emits smoke, gas, steam, dust, or other
particulate matter.
G. Involves any process which results in odor that may be objectionable or
damaging.
H. Requires any waste treatment, cooling, or settlement pond, or requires
transportation of solid or liquid wastes to a treatment or disposal site.
I. Discharges significant volumes of solid or liquid wastes.
J. Has the potential to strain the capacity of existing or planned sewage
disposal, storm drainage, or other utility systems.
Town of Vail Page 2
K. Involves any process which generates noise that may be offensive or
damaging.
L. Either displaces significant numbers of people or results in a significant
increase in population.
M. Preempts a site with potential recreational or open space value.
N. Alters local traffic patterns or causes a significant increase in traffic
volume or transit service needs.
O. Is a part of a larger project which, at any future stage, may involve any
of the impacts listed in this section.
The municipal site redevelopment project is a partnership between the Town of
Vail (ToV), the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC), the Steadman Clinic (SC), the
Stead man- Philippon Research Institute (SPRI) and Howard Head Sports
Medicine (HH) to construct a new municipal office building and a new medical
office building on the Town's municipal office site in an effort to sustain and grow
Vail's year -round economy. The proposal will redevelop approximately 1.33
acres of the 2.05 acre municipal site. According to the Official Zoning Map of the
Town of Vail, the proposed development site is located within the General Use
(GU) District. The redevelopment includes the following:
• Two separate buildings (ToV municipal offices and MOB) to be
constructed.
• The medical office building (MOB) and the Town offices total
approximately 76,551 square feet of gross building space. (MOB 55,551
sq. ft. & TOV 21,000 sq. ft.)
• A new three to four story tall municipal office building and a four to five
story tall MOB.
• A +/ -220 space below grade parking garage would be constructed to
accommodate the vehicle parking need an operated under a shared
arrangement.
• A shared loading and delivery site will be constructed to accommodate
delivers and trash removal.
• Pedestrian bridge over South Frontage Road to provide circulation
between MOB and VVMC.
• Helipad requires relocation at VVMC's expense.
• Mitigation of development impacts is required (i.e., employee housing,
traffic impact fee, art in public places, etc.).
• Development application fees, building permit and plan review fees, and
construction use tax payments are required.
• ToV to receive payment for land cost ($5 million) with a closing in March
2013.
Town of Vail Page 3
• MOB office space to be owned by SC (46 %) and VVMC (54 %). A portion
of the office space is to be leased back to SPRI and HH.
• The ToV municipal offices are displaced for the duration of the
redevelopment project construction period ( +/- 21 months).
• A total of 50 to 60 employees will be displaced during the construction
period.
• The continued operation of the police and emergency services dispatch
departments.
• Frontage Road median and turn lane improvements and other traffic
circulation improvements consistent with the Vail Transportation Master
Plan.
• The relocation of the community recycling facilities to the RV lot at the
Lionshead Parking structure.
III. PROJECT GOALS
A series of project goals have been recommended to provide direction on
throughout the course of the entitlement and construction processes. On March
20th, the Vail Town Council adopted the following goals:
• Design a new office building for the Vail community that is indicative of the
Vail's brand, spirit & heritage
• Design a new office building for the town of Vail municipal corporation
which is highly functional, user - friendly, flexible & adaptable
• Design an energy efficient, cost effective, building that is representative of
the premiere international mountain resort community
• Design a new building that integrates with the neighboring mob facility and
is coordinated with the existing police department addition and all that
carries with it
• Design a building that ensures ease of access to local government
through improved customer service capabilities and more efficient and
productive consolidated operations
• Design a building which optimizes workflow, improves the delivery of
municipal government services and includes an increased presence and
use of technology
• Deliver a new home for the town's administration, community
development, economic development, finance, human resources,
informational technology, municipal court and police departments
IV. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
Town of Vail Page 4
SECTION 12 -2 -2, DEFINITIONS
FACILITIES, HEALTHCARE: A facility principally engaged in providing services
for health maintenance, diagnosis or treatment of human diseases, pain, injury,
deformity, or physical condition.
ARTICLE 12 -9C. GENERAL USE (GU) DISTRICT
12 -9C -1: PURPOSE:
The general use district is intended to provide sites for public and quasi - public
uses which, because of their special characteristics, cannot be appropriately
regulated by the development standards prescribed for other zoning districts, and
for which development standards especially prescribed for each particular
development proposal or project are necessary to achieve the purposes
prescribed in section 12 -1 -2 of this title and to provide for the public welfare. The
general use district is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and
certain types of quasi - public uses permitted in the district are appropriately
located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to
harmonize with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other
structures, to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities
appropriate to the permitted types of uses.
12 -9C -2: PERMITTED USES (in part):
The following uses shall be permitted in the GU district:
Communications antennas and appurtenant equipment.
12 -9C -3: CONDITIONAL USES:
A. Generally: The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the GU district,
subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions
of chapter 16 of this title:
Healthcare facilities.
Helipad for emergency and /or community use.
Public buildings and grounds.
Public parking structure.
Public theaters, meeting rooms and convention facilities.
Public tourist/guest service related facilities.
Public unstructured parking.
12 -9C -5: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Town of Vail Page 5
A. Prescribed By Planning And Environmental Commission: In the general use
district, development standards in each of the following categories shall be as
Prescribed by the planning and environmental commission:
1. Lot area and site dimensions.
2. Setbacks.
3. Building height.
4. Density control.
5. Site coverage.
6. Landscaping and site development.
7. Parking and loading.
B. Reviewed By Planning And Environmental Commission: Development
standards shall be proposed by the applicant as a part of a conditional use permit
application. Site specific development standards shall then be determined by the
planning and environmental commission during the review of the conditional use
request in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title.
12 -9C -6: ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Additional regulations pertaining to site development standards and the
development of land in the general use district are found in chapter 14 of this
title.
VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
The review criteria and factors for consideration for a request of a conditional use
permit are established in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12 -16,
Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code.
A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a conditional use permit application,
the planning and environmental commission shall consider the following
factors with respect to the proposed use:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the
town.
2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities,
and other public facilities and public facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas.
Town of Vail Page 6
IX
K14
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be
located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to
the proposed use.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an
environmental impact report is required by chapter 12 of this title.
B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall
make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the
purposes of this title and the purposes of the zone district in which the site
is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable
provisions of this title.
SCHEDULE
The development schedule milestones and durations are outlined below:
• Execute the memorandum of understanding
• Issue ToV Design RFP
• Design Development
• Final Legal Document Prep. (DA)
• ToV Entitlement
• Construction Documents (CD's)
• Final CDOT Approval
• ToV Office Relocation
• Construction
NEXT STEPS
Jan. 17, 2012
Jan. 20, 2012
Feb. 2012 —
May 2012
Feb. 2012 —
May 2012
Apr. 2012 —July
2012
Aug. 2012 —
Dec. 2012
Sept. 2012
— Apr. 2013
Apr. 2013 —
Jan. 2015
May 2013 —
Jan. 2015
Town of Vail Page 7
XI
XII
A series of next steps have been identified for the project. The identified next
steps are intended to ensure the parties adhere to the project schedule. The
next steps include:
• Sign memorandum of understanding
• Authorization to issue design RFP
• Determine ToV development approach
• Negotiate the Development Agreement
• Finalize ToV program design
• CDOT Meeting
• Execute P &S agreement
• PEC work session
• PEC work session
• PEC work session
• PEC work session
• CUP application submittal
• PEC final review
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Jan. 17, 2012 (done)
Jan. 17, 2012 (done)
Mar. 20, 2012 (done)
Apr. 2012
Apr. 2012
Apr. 2012
Apr. 2012
Apr. 9,2012(done)
Apr. 23, 2012
May 14, 2012
May 21, 2012
June 11, 2012
July 9, 2012
The Community Development Department requests the Planning and
Environmental Commission tables this application to the May 14, 2012 meeting
of the Planning and Environmental Commission.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Proposed conceptual plans, dated April 23, 2012
Town of Vail Page 8
F�
V19".
4
SITE PLAN OVERVIEW
• ` •�
dp
ov
?_ It. t
Irz
4 -� K r . s _ —� .
ip
ar
�illmilab�,17 Al
m Ail - r. _ -Alm
�- -16 .
VL
IF lctrr:
-40
Ir
rr �
L+
MICHAEL GRAVES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
TOWN OF VAIL' 8, ASSOCIATES TOWN oFVaIL I oEC 2 . 23 APRIL 2012
SITE PLAN
SHARED LOADING
SHARED ACCESS
h
I
I
I
I
� I
R - I
ti� FR I I
F �
I
F r/I�,o
�F Np
Rp WSJ
1 =-
4&0 �
� SJ
PROPOSED
PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE
� r
EVERGREEN
BUILDING
VVM- C,PARKING
STRUCTURE
PROPOSE
PEDESTRIA
BRID E
1
1
� 1
1 1
1
VAILVALLEY MEDICAL \
1 CENTER
1
FIRE TRUCK ACCESS
TOV POLICE
BUILDING
Now
f
son
woo A"!w r
GE R
v
D
�= o
GERO �-
RO
SCORPIO
1 CONDOMINIUM
1
)S BANK 1
UILDING
1
\
\
SKAAL HAUS \ ,,
IVAI ASSOCATES VA I L MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
& ASSOCIATES
TOWN OF ARCHITECTS TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012
WES TBOVNo
FR
ONT AGE
U`E
MICHAEL GRAVES BmAS50GIATES VAIL MEC ;
TOWN 1 ' ARGRITECTS.� TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 8, ASSOCIATES 0
MAI m " aTA 2 no,
SITE DETAIL
QUESTIONS FROM APRIL 9 PLANNING AND ENVIROMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING
The following items represent questions or requests for additional information as a re-
i sult of the April 9, 2012 Joint PEC / DRB Meeting. Items n G reen are
or will be addressed in this meeting. The remainder are i
in the upcoming application
SITE PLANNING
initial)
n progress or will
y addressed
be addressed
1. Will the Hel*ipad be relocated and what is the future location
20 Has the group explored below grade access for pedestrian connection
30 How is the Site Accessed and what is the sense of arrival. ?
40 How is Loading and delivery accommodated on site?,
50 How many spaces will be available for grade parking?
60 How will building identity and signage be addressed on the site
79 Provide additional information for buildinq Site Coverage
80 West Meadow Drive Master Plan recommendations
90 Vision for the Grand Boulevard
BOULDER: ES VA I L MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
• & ASSOCIATES
TOWN OF VAIL.V VARGRITECTS.. TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012
TRAFFIC QUESTIONS FROM APRIL 9 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING
10. Provide a Traffic Impact Report at South Frontage Road intersecti on
11. What is the Level of Service?.
12. Provide a an exhibit of the VVMC traffic access plan
1310 For the VVMC Masterplan -What are the Traffic circulation patterns and future
land u How do they impact the design
TRANSPORTATION
14. Address the ECO bus stop location /operation /conflicts
'�. Where will the Recycle Center be relocated,,
BUILDING PLANNING
1610 Further describe the Pedestrian Bridge Connection to VVMC
Why not take down the Police Building.?
18. Please describe uses inside the MOB
DESIGN
19. Explain and Exhibit the Design compatibility between the two buildings
misc
20.
Address down valley competition and how we maintain our e dge
BOULDER: ES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
TOWN I •
VARGRITECTS.... TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012
TEMPORARY HELIPAD LOCATION
"A COMPREHENSIVE COMPARISON OF POTENTIAL SITES WILL BE DISCUSSED AT THE APRIL 23, 2012 PEC MEETING
0 S
MICHAEL GRAVES r",Ww- VAIL ME)
TOWN OF VAIL' &ASSOCIATE
0
MA m " avA a we] 0
INTERNAL SITE /PEDESTRIAN ROUTES
MAIN ROUTES
o-_______________
WALKING /ROLLING
TRANSFER FLOOR TO
FLOOR VIA ELEVATOR
o- ...............
WALKING / ROLLING TRANS-
FER FROM ELEVATORTO FINAL
LOCATION
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING MUNICIPAL BUILDING
MEZZANINE / LEVEI
PLAZA LEVEL
LEVEL P1
PARKING ARRIVAL AXONOMETRIC
MICHAEL GRAVES
0
VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL' &ASSOCIATES L � ITOWNOFVAIL
:rAl m 11 XTA a we] 0
SITE ACCESS /TURNING MOVEMENTS
6SOCI i,, VAIL MEC
MICHAEL GRAVES VARGRITECTS. AS50GIATES;
i • •
TOWN 1 . TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2
:rAmplavAngs,
71
DEL
TRA
1 t-% A r%IA 1 - / r%r'1 11 /r'r%\/ r%t -%/-1/ /'1
LOADING /TRASH REMOVAL AT MEZZANINE LEVEL OF MOB
POTENTIAL LOADING /FED EX / UP DELIVERY AT POLICE ENTRANCE
MICHAEL GRAVES
TOWN OF VAIL' &ASSOCIATES
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING
LEVEL
LEVEL
LEVEL 2 / LEVE
MEZZANINE / LEVEI
VERY
`K STOP
law, ;l���L I
LEVEL P1
LOADING AXONOMETRIC
r.
LOADING TRUCK PATH/
DELIVERY POINT
o-_______________
TRANSFER FLOOR TO FLOOR
VIA ELEVATOR
o- ...............
TRANSFER FROM ELEVATOR
TO FINAL LOCATION
MUNICIPAL BUILDING
--m
aft aft
:rAl m 11 XTA a go] 0
LEVE
1
>� SECTION THRU TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING AND PARKING
MICHAEL GRAVES
TOWN OF 9VAIL't &ASSOCIATES L
SURFACE AND SUBGRADE PARKING OPPORTUNITIES
TOWN OF VAIL SURFACE /TUCK UNDER SPACES
MEDICAL OFFICE TUCK UNDER SPACES
[WA mrmutwIM��m��aTiaur
Initial importance of the Existing Police Bu*i1d*ing,
EXISITING POLICE BUILDING
Contains CRITICAL AND RECENTLY INSTALLED Emergency functional items that would be
difficult to TRANSFER /take offline at this time
NEW Building systems are oversized and can be retooled to serve the proposed building
Building is centra
Portion of the Bu
Ily
ildina will be renovated
ocated for access /visibility
M
BOULDER: ES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
1 I TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
e
0
Site
Site Area
Site Coverage
Medical Office Building
Town of Vail
Total
Medical Office Building
Town of Vail
MICHAEL GRAVES
TOWN OF VAIL' &ASSOCIATES
Total
Area
Site Boundaries
_
24,700 sq ft
64,600 sq ft
89,300 sq ft
21,954
45,540
67, 494
RD1Fnr'-',*F-
Percentage
87.82
70.50%
75.58%
ffiE COVERAGE AT
75q W/0 UTILIZING
RIGHT OF WAY
Area
To Frontage Road
30,747 sq ft
74,290 sq ft
105,037 sq ft
21,954 sq ft
45,540 sq ft
67,494 sq ft
SITE COVERAGE
go
p,D
GE
�P
RO
N
of _
Percentage
r.
71%1
Notes
** *Includes area of the Existing Police Building to be Renovated
61%1 * "Includes area of the Existing Police Building to be Renovated
64°0
0
VA m " XTA a we] 0
8790_
\ \ SOUTH FRONTAGE RD WEST \ \ �- —x
LIONHEAD INFO BOOTH
# 0 n
LIONHEAD PARKING STRUCTURE
EAST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE
_l
I-- -
�0
8185 —
ds A,''
I _
\slao
8170
r NEW VAI�RECYCLING
9, >o
11 CENTER LOCATION
.I
/ 81so�
STAIRWAYS TO BE I
RECONSTRUCTED
AT A LATER TIME
-8153 -
v -8150
in
� 14
l
\ `8150
\ I '
s
.2 l
D
VAIL INTERNATIONAL
6155 \_
DOBSON ICE ARENA
PROPOSED RECYCLING CENTER SITE PLAN AT LIONSHEAD PARKING STRUCTURE
PROPOSED RECYCLING CENTER
POURED IN PLACE
CONCRETE SLAB. 6"
DEPTH. SEE DETAIL.
INSTALL NEW 6' TALL WOODEN
FENCE. ONE SIDED AROUND —
RECYCLE CONTAINERS, TYP.
PROVIDE SLEEVES FOR POSTS
INSTALL NEW 6' TALL
WOODEN FENCE. TWO
SIDED ALONG PARKING LOT
INSTALL (2) 6'
SWING GATES FOR
SNOW REMOVAL
0
54.0'
8.0'
MIN.
INSTALL NEW LIGHT I I
FIXTURE /BASE I
1 I
On
O O
0
0-0 v�—
—_ \
O n
D Z
D
\ °m
m
p
OOp
;am
X�
XO
INSTALL NEW ELECTRICAL
DISCONNECT FOR POWER TO
COMPACTOR (208V) AND
LIGHT FIXTURES
INSTALL NEW LIGHT
FIXTURES /BASES
PROPOSED RECYCLING CENTER PLAN
n
O
D
c�
O
x
� II
/ Ic
Ioc
ri
/
i / /ll II
\ MAII /�/
�► ° I111�
1 11 876
(7 C0 n
\ I ° 50% MIX OF 2" AND 7 GAL ASPEN OZ O o D 0 p I I ti'vj
11 �2 Dm c- II
Z °
I D Z ;u Z
mm m .Zm
6' 1p 1� III II \
50% MIX OF BRISTLECONE AND CBS 70 I I
�— 4' NATIVE CHOKECHERRY ® ® O
I I D �I I► I II
O l l III
l l 111 �
\
C3 II III \
165_
/ � INSTALL NE tN DRIP tRRIGATI0 1q � � — — � �
TO-AtL NE w PLANTING -8160-
a
0
PROPOSED RECYCLING CENTER LANDSCAPE PLAN
,•� ASSOCATES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
TOWN OF VAILt & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012
Occupant Overview /General Parking Per Code (511000, 411000) Parking per code with 20% Reduction Notes
Net / Usable
G ross
PROJECT DENSITY
F 7��man Clinic 34,950 sq ft inc below 165.1 Spaces 132 Spaces Partial Parking for Conf at 411000
F 7��man Philippon Research Institute 14,150 sq ft inc below 56.6 Spaces 45 Spaces Parking at 411000
ffng Lab -Suite 3,500 sq ft inc below 17.5 Spaces
ffrd Head 6,500 sq ft inc below 32.5 Spaces 26 Spaces
ffof Vail
18,000
sq
ft21,00
0
sq
ft
72 Spaces
58 Spaces
Parking at 4/1000
Potential Expansion
4,500
sq
ft5,00
0
sq
ft
Total Full Program
Net/ Usable
Gross Area
Site
Site Area
Site Coverage
Medical Office Building
59,100
sq
ft
Town of Vail
22,500
1
sq
ft
Total
81,600
sq
ft
Medical Office Building
Town of Vail
Total
Area
Site Boundaries
Medical Office Building
24,700
sq
ft
Town of Vail
64,600
1
sq
ft
Total
89,300
sq
ft
Medical Office Building 21,954
Town of Vail 45,540
Total 67, 494
69,200 sq ft
26,000 sq ft
95,200 sq ft
Percentage
87.82
70.50%
75.58°0
344 Spaces
Area
To Frontage Road
301747 sq ft
74,290 sq ft
105,037 sq ft
21,954 sq ft
45,540 sq ft
67,494 sq ft
261 Spaces
Percentage
71%
Notes
'Includes area of the Existing Police Building to be Renovated
61% 'Includes area of the Existing Police Building to be Renovated
64%
BOULDER: ES VA I L MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
• & ASSOCIATES 0
1 I AA;CH,TEC *s' TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012
MUNCIPAL PROGRAM AREAS
Town of Vail - Muncipal SPACE SUMMARY
April 18, 2012
MICHAEL GRAVES �^ & ASSOCIATES
VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
TOWN OF VAIL.V F-A TOWN oFVaIL oEC 2 . 23 APRIL 2012
Staff
Area
Common
Common -Office Function
4,139
Common - Council Function
3375
Common - Public Building (restrooms etc)
3,351
Common - Ammenities
972
Department
Administration
61
i,ior,
Community Development
13
1,939
Economic Development
3
Zii
Finance
ii
1,28o
Human Resources
5
i,o96
IT
8
702_
Municipal Court
3
524
T otal PROGRAMMED USF 15,341
T otal CURRENT Area :L81692
Potential EXPANSION 5,000
MICHAEL GRAVES �^ & ASSOCIATES
VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
TOWN OF VAIL.V F-A TOWN oFVaIL oEC 2 . 23 APRIL 2012
m
PUBLIC PLAZA
b
1
C ONNMON
' omCi
1
GROUND LEVEL -TOWN HALL
PARKING GAR.:GE
_a.
It
CON.0ON
omcf '
ONO
1 1
mo wlu.
1 /
IT / SERVERS
a� ■�aa i i ■ /i� ■1i ■>M
PLMUC PATIO CASHIER / PUBLIC RECORDS
■
EXTERIOR ■
■
TERRACE ■
(OPTIONAL) ■ CHAMBERS
■
■
■
■
•
t
THIRD LEVEL -TOWN HALL
0 MICHAEL GRAVES
TOWN OF VA 8, ASSOCIATES L
cou+cx
ass"ouT
I 11! $ \0\\\\\\\
MTG
MTG
co"*
OMCf
MTG
EXTERIOR TERRACE (OPTIONAL)
1
I
1
I
f
I
1
V
WOEJ
--o
MUNICIPAL /TOWN HALL FLOOR PLANS
I
MIA
Fl NANC E
IT
STAFF OWY
HUMAN RESOURCE`
Vbw ROL Mw Am' }
MTG
t
co+r.ow
offl(c. I
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
2ND LEVEL LEVEL - MUNICIPAL
COMMON COUNCIL FLPMETIOM
MEETING SPACE
COMMON OFFICE
COMMON COREISHELL
VAIL MEC
TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2
AD MI14 ISTRATIO14
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PMENT
ECONOMIC a EVELOPMEMT
FIMAMCE
MTG
MA m 11 avA a we] 0
MUNICIPAL
COURT STAFF
HUMAN RESOURCES
IT
AMU MICIPAL COURT
AMMEMMIES
PARK IMG
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING PROGRAM AREAS
Occupied Space:
Steadman Clinic - Doctor Offices
-
-
11,700
11,700
-
23,400
Steadman Clinic - Admin'. Flex &Other
567
-
-
-
311609
4,176
Steadman Clinic - MR1 Suite
3,304
-
-
-
-
3,304
SPRI - Conference
-
-
-
-
111320
1,320
SPRI - Admin &Research
-
6.1708
-
-
-
6,708
SPRI - Surgical Skills Lab
-
2.1500
-
-
-
2,500
SPRI - Biomechanics Lab
-
411000
-
-
-
4,000
Howard Head
-
-
4,263
4,263
-
8,526
Town of Vail
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Occupied SF
3.0871
13,208
15,963
15,963
4,929
53,934
Core &Common Elements:
Corridors
-
-
-
-
-
-
Penetrations &Core Elements
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stairs &Elevators
-
-
-
-
-
-
Lobby /Circulatiion /Core
2,465
2,339
1,658
1,658
1,868
9,988
Total Other Spaces
2,465
2,339
1,658
1,658
1,868
9,988
Total Above Grade SF
6,336
15,547
17,621
17,621
6,797
63,922
BOULDER: ES VA I L MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
• & ASSOCIATES 0
1 I AA;CH,TEC *s' TOWN OF VAIL I PEC 2 • 23 APRIL 2012
LE
LE
LE
LE
LE
BUILDING AXONOMETRIC --
PROJECT STACKING DIAGRAM
PROGRAM
0
f
MICHAEL GRAVES VAIL MEDICAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOP
TOWN OF 9VAIL't 8, ASSOCIATES TOWN oFVaIL I oEC 2 . 23 APRIL 2012
Parking
Lobby
Loading
Howard Head
Imaging
The Steadman Clinic
Steadman Phillipon Research Institute
Municipal
Poilice Building (Existing)
LANDSCAPE PLAZA
THE FOLLOWING TOPICS WILL BE DISCUSSED AT THE APRIL 23 PEC MEETING VIA DIAGRAMS AND IMAGES
PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE SPACE
VISIBILITY: LANDMARK
CONSISTENT
WITH SITE
AS
A PRIMARY
CIVIC
DESTINATION?
REFLECTION OF
LOCAL
CHARACTER:
EMPHASIS
ON
LANDSCAPING
WITH NATIVES?
GATHERING PLACE: OUTDOOR SPACE TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY
RANGE OF POSSIBLE USES
• COMMUNITY EVENTS?
• INFORMAL SEATING?
• BUS STOP?
• PRIMARILY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ft ACCESS?
DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS AND FEATURES
• PREDOMINANTLY HARDSCAPE OR PLANTING?
• FORMAL /ORNAMENTAL V5. NATIVE /ALPINE/
• FOCAL LANDSCAPE FEATURE?
• SHADE?
• ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE?
MICHAEL GRAVES
TOWN OF VA &ASSOCIATES L
ORGANIC?
(£t MOB)
r.
FUNCTIONS?
0
MA m " avA a we] 0
/ LANDSCAPE
TOWN OF VA
PEC Members Present
Susan Bird
Michael Kurz
Pam Hopkins
Bill Pierce
Henry Pratt
John Rediker
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
April 9, 2012
12:30pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
Members Absent
Luke Cartin
DRB Members Present Members Absent
DuBois None
Forstl
Gillette
Kjesbo
Maio
Lunch with Design Review Board 30 minutes
A Joint work - session on the municipal site redevelopment
Swearing in new members — Lorelei Donaldson 10 minutes
PEC Chair
ACTION: Pierce Chair
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 6 -0 -0
PEC Vice -Chair
ACTION: Pratt Vice -Chair
MOTION: Pierce SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 6 -0 -0
60 minutes
A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12 -9C -3, Conditional
Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a public building and grounds, to allow for the
redevelopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and
office building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South Frontage Road
West /unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012)
Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and Town of Vail, represented
by Consilium Partners, Vail
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Tabled to April 23, 2012
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 6 -0 -0
Warren Campbell presented the staff memorandum.
Page 1
George Ruther, Community Development Department Director, presented the background and
history of the proposed municipal site redevelopment project.
Commissioner Rediker asked for clarification about the need for an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR).
Warren Campbell answered that an EIR is not anticipated at this time.
Will Hentschel, Oz Architecture, Town of Vail's representative presented an overview of the
proposed redevelopment project and the associated development standards.
George Ruther clarified that the current development site consists of two lots, and there is no
proposal to re- subdivide those existing lots.
Commissioner Pierce asked for clarification about the proposed setbacks.
Will Hentschel clarified.
George Ruther and Mike Foster discussed the applicants' discussions with CDOT concerning
construction proximity and logistics related to 1 -70, the South Frontage Road, and relocating the
helipad. Mike Foster noted that the helipad is anticipated to be relocated to the east end of Ford
Park.
Commissioner Hopkins asked about impacts of this project on peak traffic times and impacts to
the South Frontage Road.
Mike Foster and George Ruther explained the considerations explored to date and noted that
consultants are preparing a formal traffic study.
Commission Kurz cautioned on the practicality of left turns exiting from the site at peak times.
George Ruther noted how this proposal facilitates the redevelopment of the medical center
facilities on the south side of the South Frontage Road and that the traffic study will include the
anticipated redevelopment at the Vail Valley Medical Center.
Commissioner Pierce asked about addressing current driveway access points conflicts.
Commissioner Bird asked about the existing pedestrian cross -walk and identified the current
conflicts with the ECO bus stop.
Mike Foster noted that the pedestrian bridge is intended to improve pedestrian circulation across
the road.
Andy Forstl asked about a below grade pedestrian tunnel.
Mike Foster and George Ruther identified the challenges associated with a tunnel and how a
bridge could better facilitate redevelopment on the south side of the road.
Commissioner Kurz asked if the TOV building would be filled by existing uses or if expansion
would be possible.
George Ruther clarified that little growth beyond current services could be accommodated at this
time. He noted that spaces would be significantly more efficient that the existing office spaces.
Page 2
Commissioner Kurz asked about the appearance of a campus or of two separate buildings
George Ruther clarified that the two buildings will have separate architectural character,
especially since the current police addition will not be demolished and must be integrated into
the new municipal building addition.
Commissioner Kurz asked how the medical center treats patients and how that affects the
location of the helipad, especial is the longer distance to the helipad has patient treatment
impacts.
Mike Foster noted that the current location was supposed to be a one -year temporary solution
back in 1983. He added that it is proposed to be temporarily relocated to Ford Park and the
helipad is intended to be permanently relocated to the current hospital site.
George Ruther noted that the sole intent of the helipad is for emergency situations and ultimately
the helipad should be located on the roof of the hospital building.
Commissioner Pierce noted the importance of the DRB addressing the lack of continuity of the
three buildings (TOV, MOB, and hospital site).
Tom DuBois expressed his support for having separate buildings and distinctive character.
Brian Gillette agreed.
Commissioner Pierce noted the DRB's general support for the design concept.
George Ruther noted that all buildings in Vail must have general compatibility with their
neighborhoods.
Commission Peirce stated that there is not a strong need to have current police addition drive
the architectural design of the new TOV building.
Tom DuBois agreed and noted how it reduces the mass of the building and gives the
appearance of additions over time.
Brian Gillette agreed.
Commissioner Rediker asked for clarification about the interior connection of town hall to the
police addition.
George Ruther explained the options being explored.
Commissioner Rediker asked about the bulk and mass concerns of attaching a 3 to 4 story
addition to the existing 2 story police addition.
George Ruther explained the integrations issues being explored (consolidating mechanical and
communication equipment, etc.). He explained the additional cost and parking demands
associated with a fourth story to the new town hall building and when this issued will be
addressed by the Town Council.
Commissioner Rediker asked why the police addition is not being remodeled and if the town hall
building and the police addition are considered one building.
Page 3
George Ruther explained the reasoning for not demolishing the existing police addition.
Commissioner Pierce noted that maintaining the police addition will help prevent the construction
of a large municipal "monument" and helps maintain the current scale. He recommended the
DRB review in detail the proposed sense of arrival and the appropriate architectural styling. He
concluded by asking about loading and delivery.
Will Hentschel and George Ruther described the proposed loading and delivery facilities, the site
constraints, and the potential positive and negative effects of the options.
Brian Gillette asked for clarification about the site entrance and parking location and usage.
Will Hentschel, George Ruther, and Mike Foster described the operation of the parking structure.
Commissioner Rediker asked about the parking management (paid or free parking, skier
parking, enforcement, etc.)
George Ruther identified that the Town Council will be discussing this topic at an upcoming
public hearing and described the opportunities for non - business hour, alternative parking uses.
Tom DuBois asked for clarification about patient access to the MOB.
Mike Foster described the proposed arrival and access to the MOB.
Tom DuBois cautioned against over signing the buildings.
Commissioner Pierce asked for clarification of the proposed uses in the MOB.
Mike Foster identified the anticipated users /businesses and described the building programming.
Commissioner Pratt asked if the proposed building was designed to be five stories and built
property line to property line.
Mike Foster described the layout of the proposed MOB.
Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowner Association, noted the Vail Transportation Master Plan
recommends that hospital vehicular and pedestrian traffic be removed from West Meadow Drive.
He noted that many past master plans for the hospital have not been implemented. He
requested that the Vail Valley Medical Center provide their future plans during the review of this
project. He disclosed that his wife owns a unit adjacent to the medical center. He noted that the
medical center traffic and the trash /recycling center does not make for a good neighbor.
He believes that the Vail Valley Medical Center future plans are not a separate project from this
proposal and their future plans must be disclosed as part of this review. He recommended the
TOV /MOB, Vail Valley Medical Center, and Evergreen Lodge redevelopments must be
considered collectively, especially related to traffic and vehicle access. He asked for an example
of other buildings in Vail that are comparable in size.
George Ruther mentioned the US Bank building and the Tivoli Lodge as being similar in scale.
Jim Lamont asked which development guidelines apply to the MOB /TOV redevelopment.
Page 4
George Ruther clarified that the general, town -wide guidelines apply. The Vail Village and
Lionshead guidelines would not apply.
Brian Gillette asked for further clarification. He asked fi future access points would be addressed
by the traffic study.
Will Hentschel indicated, yes.
Jim Lamont recommended that the traffic study address all the development sites (TOV /MOB,
Vail Valley Medical Center, US Bank, and Evergreen Lodge) and the loading /delivery associated
with all the sites. He requested that the traffic report analyze a possible round -a -bout in depth
and not only at a conceptual level. He noted his concerns about the frequency and intent of the
helipad use. He recommended the helicopter arrives only on demand, and does not recommend
that helicopters fly in every morning and then fly out every evening.
Commissioner Bird disagreed that having helicopters only fly in from down valley when called
takes too much time for patient needs.
Jim Lamont recommended that the FAA be contacted regarding regulations and that controls
needed to be put in place to ensure that flights are only for emergency use and not elective
treatments.
Jim Lamont asked if the MOB /TOV site would be part of a Urban Renewal District, or other
similar designation.
George Ruther answered, not at this time; but the design team is looking into all the financing
options.
Jim Lamont noted that the pedestrian bridge may need to be a more grand vision. He
recommended exploring a cut - and -cover design concept similar to proposal to bury 1 -70 /frontage
roads and the Vail Pass wildlife bridges. This could provide additional usable space and future
uses.
Gwen Scapello noted her support of Mr. Lamont's questions. She asked if the MOB is designed
with room for expansion and growth. She asked if years in the future the Town would need to
again relocate to accommodate future MOB growth.
George Ruther identified how after economic /business analysis the MOB has been scaled back
from their initial design for a large proposed building.
Gwen Scapello asked about the potential re- purposing MOB building if the tenants move down
valley or out of Vail in the future.
George Ruther described the Town Council and medical center discussions on this topic. He
described the investments being made by the applicants and the long term benefits to the
medical center. He noted that the future potential uses on the property would be determined by
the General Use District. The Town Council chose not to place further use restrictions (such as
private covenants) on the MOB site with the land sales agreement.
Gwen Scapello asked for clarification on the proposed parking structure design.
Will Hentschel clarified the design.
Page 5
Gwen Scapello asked about the relocation of the community recycling center.
George Ruther noted that the recycling center may be relocated to several Town owned lots.
The most likely properties are the RV lot adjacent to the Lionshead Parking Structure and the
Public Works Facility. He noted that the long term solution may be Town -wide curbside
recycling.
Commissioner Rediker asked about using the RV lot for helipad use.
George Ruther noted the conflicts associated with the many vehicles. He noted that seven
locations are being considered, but only two sites that meet all the site selection criteria: Ford
Park and the Town of Vail snow dump at the Public Works facility.
Brian Gillette noted that the farther the recycling in relocated from the main round -a -bout the less
is will be used.
George Ruther noted that one alternative consider were many remote locations, but there are
impacts to that as well.
Gwen Scapello noted the need for the RV lot.
Jim Lamont asked if the MOB could be a stand -alone building.
George Ruther and Will Hentschel described how the parking structure would need to be re-
designed.
Jim Lamont noted that long term the TOV site could be a future office building and town hall
could be relocated to many alternative locations. He expressed the need to address Vail's
"original sins" such as traffic and access issues related to the subject sites, Meadow Drive, RV
lot, Dobson Ice Arena, the library, Evergreen Lodge, Vail International, etc. He cautioned about
having a "Vail centric" view. He noted that the concern should not be about the medical center
moving, but about a competitor starting down valley and those impacts to Vail and this medical
center. He noted that Vail has grown into a city and we need to remain competitive. He noted
that he supports this project, but only if it makes Vail's medical service more competitive.
Commissioner Pierce expressed that traffic volumes, left turns, hospital access, etc. needs to be
examined in more detail. What are the impacts if the hospital access is relocated across the
street from this site in the future?
Commissioner Kurz noted the concerns about timing around this project. He is not concerned
about the threat of down valley competition. He disagrees with concerns about helicopter noise
in exchange for saving a life.
Commissioner Pratt believes there are traffic concerns regardless of the medical center, and all
surrounding issues must be examined.
Commissioner Kurz agrees with Mr. Pratt and recommends traffic master plan.
Brian Gillette asked about the frontage road design and the location of future round -a- bouts.
Commissioner Bird asked if the medical center was participating in exploring traffic solutions.
George Ruther answered, yes.
Page 6
15 minutes
2. A request for the review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review
Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the re- subdivision of Lots 2 and 3, Bighorn Subdivision
4t" Addition, located at 4316 and 4336 Streamside Circle West, and setting details in regards
thereto. (PEC110063)
Applicant: Diamond Assets, represented by Triumph Development
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Approved with conditions
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 5 -1 -0 (Hopkins opposed)
CONDITIONS:
1. The applicant shall add the following note to the plat: The addresses on this plat are
for reference purposes only. Please refer to the Town of Vail for updated addressing
information.
2. The applicant shall delete the administrator certificate from the plat.
3. The applicant shall ensure that the final plat does not render the existing legally non-
conforming side setbacks more nonconforming.
Bill Gibson made a presentation per the staff memorandum.
Commissioner Rediker asked the purpose of moving the lot line.
Mike Foster, applicant's representative, stated that the purpose of moving the lot line is to
redistribute development potential for redevelopment.
Commissioner Pierce stated the new property line seems more logical than the existing property
line. He added that a non - conforming lot would not be created.
Mike Foster noted that the new lot lines will not worsen the existing conditions.
Commissioner Rediker asked what an 80'x 80' square represents.
Bill Gibson stated that the Vail Town Code requires an 80' x 80' square fit into lots to provide a
buildable lot.
Commissioner Pierce asked for clarification on which lot lines exist and which lines are
proposed. He amended his previous comments and noted that the existing lines are more
logical than the proposed.
Commissioner Pratt asked for clarification of distance between buildings and property lines. He
added that it seems the setbacks seem to be reduced with the change in property lines.
Bill Gibson stated that based on the criteria, Staff recommends approval and mentioned the
Town Code has no requirement for straight property lines.
Commissioner Hopkins asked which house would potentially be redeveloped. She also asked
where a redeveloped house would be located on the lot.
Mike Foster noted that a new house would need to comply with setbacks.
Commissioner Hopkins added that with the proposed property lines better accommodate
additions to the existing structures than the current lot lines.
Page 7
30 minutes
3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for amendments to the Ford Park
Management Plan, to allow for the construction of various improvements at Ford Park
(realignment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession buildings, new covered outdoor
terrace, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park entrance improvements, Betty Ford
Alpine Garden welcome center, streetscape improvements, etc.) located at 530, 540, and 580
South Frontage Road East /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120006)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Recommendation of approval
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Bird VOTE: 5 -1 -0 (Pratt opposed)
Bill Gibson presented the staff memorandum.
Commissioner Pierce clarified that if there is any assurance of the Ford Park improvements.
Bill Gibson stated that these are master plan recommendations and do not a project will be
constructed as shown since these are illustrative plans and not construction drawings.
Tom Braun, the applicant's representative, reviewed the revisions made to the proposed
management plan amendments in response to the comments from Commission's last hearing
including loading and delivery, pedestrian access and other issues outlined in the application
material.
Commissioner Kurz asked if access from the west end of Betty Ford Way would be closed and
asked about feasibility of widening east Betty Ford Way.
Todd Oppenheimer noted that the west access would continue to have gates, but should to be
more closely controlled. He described the potential re- grading and retaining wall associated with
upgrading the east access road.
Commissioner Hopkins asked delivery vehicle traffic.
Tom Braun provided details on the vision for future delivery vehicle access in the park. He
added that a solution that is cost effective and workable will be found and then will be
implemented. He added that a solution will be presented in the development application, and the
master plan is a guide for future development. He said there is room to work and there is an
opportunity to minimize trips through the west side of the park. He identified alternative traffic
flow options that are still being considered.
Tom Braun then described the proposed Betty Ford Alpine Garden's education building, and
explained the reasoning for its location. He said the commissioners expressed interest in
moving the future building to the east of the schoolhouse, but he said the west side was a better
solution.
Petro Campos of Zehren and Associates also addressed previous Commissioner comments
about the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. He stated that putting the new education center to the
east of the school house would displace the existing children's garden areas, which was very
costly to build and would be difficult to relocate. The context of the views work best with the
current proposal. He added that location as it relates to Betty Ford Way was a major factor in
selecting the building location. He stated that there is a blue spruce along Betty Ford Way that
marks the start of great views of Gore Creek. He explained the proposed location of the BFAG
building and its relationship to other elements in the vicinity.
Page 8
Commissioner Rediker asked Staff about Objective 1.3 (page 14) designating preservation
zones. He is wondering if there has been any designation of preservation zones and if so, where
they are.
Tom Braun stated they are shown on the plan around Gore Creek and the Nature Center with
dashed lines.
Commissioner Rediker had noted his concerns about coal tar sealants at the previous
Commission hearings. He identified the health and environmental risks and mentioned that these
sealants have been banned by the State of Washington, Washington DC, Austin, TX, Madison,
WI and Dane County, WI. He said these should sealants should be banned here in Vail.
Todd Oppenheimer stated that these sealants are most commonly used on residential driveway
and parking applications and that the Town of Vail does not use these materials to maintain
roadways. Instead the Town of Vail either adds more asphalt, removes some top surface
asphalt before adding more asphalt, or adds a chip seal over the road; but none of methods uses
coal tar products.
Commissioner Rediker stated he understands the need to expand the paths and roads in the
park, but their proximity to the creek means the town needs to take care of the creek and make
sure there is no toxins going into the creek.
Todd Oppenheimer stated the Town will use all best management practices possible during
construction.
After the motion was made, Commissioner Pratt stated he is opposed to the storage building at
the west end of the athletic fields and he doesn't think the recommendations for the Betty Ford
Alpine Gardens are fully resolved.
5 minutes
4. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -16-
10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various
improvements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession
buildings, new covered outdoor terrace, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park
entrance improvements, Betty Ford Alpine Garden welcome center, streetscape improvements,
etc.) located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East/Unplatted, and setting forth details
in regard thereto. (PEC120003)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Tabled to April 23, 2012
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5 minutes
5. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations
amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will
implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC090028)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond /Kristen Bertuglia
ACTION: Tabled to April 23, 2012
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Pratt VOTE: 6-0-0
Page 9
6. Approval of March 26, 2012 minutes
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Hopkins
7. Information Update
8. Adjournment
MOTION: Rediker SECOND: Hopkins
VOTE: 5 -0 -1 (Bird abstained)
VOTE: 6 -0 -0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970)
479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published April 6, 2012, in the Vail Daily.
Page 10
Ad Name: 7812036A
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM
COMMISSION
April O NCI CHAMBERS
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Your account number is: 1023233
/PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657
Vail Daily T
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Y
Site Visit:
1. Habenicht Residence- 1622 Matterhorn Circle
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
15 minutes
1.A request for the review of variances from Sec-
tion 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant
STATE OF COLORADO }
to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to
allow for the construction of a deck/car port within
the side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Cir-
I SS
cle /Lot 25B, Matterhorn Village, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC110057)
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
Applicant: Florence Habenicht
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND:VOTE:
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified
representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper
CONDITION(S): 90 minutes
2.A request for the review of conditional use per -
mits, pursuant to Section 12 -9C -3, Conditional Us-
in whole or in and in the County
es, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a
public building and grounds, to allow for the rede-
printed, part published
velopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a
of Eagle, State of Colorado and has a general circulation
g > > g
medical research, rehabilitation, and office building
and a municipal office building located at 75 and
therein; that said newspaper has been published continuous)
p y
set South Frontage Road West/ U(PEC1ed, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012)
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Tri-
umph Development and Town of Vail, represented
more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first
by Consilium Partners, Vail
Planner: Warren Campbell
of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and
ACTION:
MOTIOIN: SECOND:VOTE:
publication
that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice
p q g
5 minutes
3.A request for the review of amendments to a
and advertisement as requested.
conditional use permit, pursuant to Section
12- 16 -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town
Code, to allow for the construction of various im-
provements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium,
fields, new restroom and concession buildings,
new covered outdoor terrace, Gerald R. Ford Am-
phitheater renovations, park entrance improve -
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
ments, Betty Ford Alpine Garden welcome center,
streetscape improvements, etc.) located at 530,
Rule rOV1SlOn.
1)
540, and 580 South Frontage Road East/ Unplat-
ted, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC120003)
Applicant: Town of Vail
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to May 14, 2012
published in the regular and entire issue of every
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5 minutes
4.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
number of said daily for the period of 1
Y I1
Council, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment,
Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulations
consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said
I�
amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and
Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code,
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 4/20/2012 and
to require restoration of watercourses and riparian
areas, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
that the last publication of said notice was dated 4/20/2012 in
(PEC120011)
Applicant: Town of Vail
the issue of said newspaper.
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Table to May 14, 2012
MOTION: SECOND:VOTE:
5 minutes
5.A request for a final recommendation to the Vail
In witness whereof, I have here unto set m hand this day,
In Y a Y�
Council for prescribed regulations amend-
ments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14,
O5/O7/2012.
Development Standards, Vail Town Code, pursu-
ant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town
Code, to provide regulations that will implement
sustainable building and planning standards, and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC090028)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond/Kristen Bertuglia
ACTION: Table to June 11, 2012
General Manager /Publisher /Editor
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Vail Daily
6.Aroval of April
MOTION: SECOND :VOTE: minutes
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for
7.Information Update
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 05/07/2012.
8.Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the propos-
als are available for public inspection during regu-
lar office hours at the Town of Vail Community y De-
velopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
i
The public is invited to attend the project orienta-
tion and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Develop-
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public
ment Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be re-
lied upon to determine at what time the Planning
My Commission November 1 2015
and Environmental Commission will consider an
expires:
item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional in-
formation. Sign language interpretation is available
upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call
(970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im-
paired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published April 20, 2012 in the Vail Daily.
(7812036)
Ad Name: 7762511 A
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM
Your account number is: 1023233
Vail Daily
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO }
}SS.
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified
representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper
printed, in whole or in part and published in the County
of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation
therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first
publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and
that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice
and advertisement as requested.
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every
number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1
consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 4/6/2012 and
that the last publication of said notice was dated 4/6/2012 in
the issue of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
04/19/2012.
General Manager /Publisher /Editor
Vail Daily
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 04/19/2012.
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public
My Commission expires: November 1, 2015
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and
Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will
hold a public hearing in accordance with section
12 -3 -6, Vail Town Code, on April 23, 2012, at 1:00
pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in con-
sideration of:
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment,
Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulations
amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and
Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code,
to require restoration of watercourses and riparian
areas, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC120011)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond
A request for the review of variances from Section
12 -613-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to
Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to al-
low for the construction of a deck/car port within the
side setback, located at 1622 Matterhorn Circle /Lot
25B, Matterhorn Village, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC110057)
Applicant: Florence Habenicht
Planner: Bill Gibson
The applications and information about the propos-
als are available for public inspection during office
hours at the Town of Vail Community Develop-
ment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend site visits. Please call
970 - 479 -2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon re-
quest, with 24 -hour notification. Please call
970- 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im-
paired, for information.
Published April 6, 2012, in the Vail Daily.
(7762511)