HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-0625 PECTOWN OF VA P� PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
June 25, 2012
1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road W. - Vail, Colorado 81657
**Order and times of agenda items are subject to change**
60 minutes
A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional
Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a public building and grounds, to allow for the
redevelopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and
office building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South Frontage Road West/
Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012)
Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and Town of Vail, represented
by Consilium Partners, Vail
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
45 minutes
2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed regulations
amendment, pursuant to 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for amendments to Title
12, Zoning Regulations, to amend the development review process, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC120010)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-3-7,
Amendment, Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulations amendments to Title 12, Zoning
Regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, to require restoration of
watercourses and riparian areas, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120011)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Table to July 9, 2012
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary
amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of
the Vail National Bank Building (US Bank Building) from Special Development District No. 23
with an underlying zoning of Commercial Service Center District to the General Use District,
located at 108 South Frontage Road West/Lot D2, Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC120014)
Applicant: Vail Clinic Inc., represented by Rick Pylman and Jim Wear
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to July 9, 2012
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Page 1
5. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments
to Section 12-13-5, Employee Housing Unit Deed Restriction Exchange Program, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for amendments to the
employee housing unit deed restriction exchange program review process, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC120017)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to August 13, 2012
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
6. Approval of May 21, 2012 minutes
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
7. Information Update
8. Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published June 22, 2012, in the Vail Daily.
Page 2
TOWN OF
0) VAIL'
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission/Design Review Board
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: June 25, 2012
SUBJECT: A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section
12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a
public building and grounds, to allow for the redevelopment of the Town of
Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and office
building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South
Frontage Road West/unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC120012)
Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and
Town of Vail, represented by Consilium Partners, Vail
Planner: Warren Campbell
I. SUMMARY
The purpose of this joint work session meeting is to respond to questions raised
at the May 14th public hearing and to continue the presentation of information on
the municipal site redevelopment project to the Planning and Environmental
Commission. Information to be presented includes:
• Layout of uses within each building
• Site circulation and turning movements
• Discussion of the parking demand study
• Discussion of project goals
• Discussion of criteria
• Discussion of zoning statistics
Staff and the applicant request the application be tabled to July 9, 2012.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The municipal site redevelopment project is a partnership between the Town of
Vail (ToV), the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC), the Steadman Clinic (SC), the
Stead man -Ph ilippon Research Institute (SPRI) and Howard Head Sports
Medicine (HH) to construct a new municipal office building and a new medical
office building on the Town's municipal office site in an effort to sustain and grow
Vail's year-round economy. The proposal will redevelop approximately 1.33
acres of the 2.05 acre municipal site. According to the Official Zoning Map of the
Town of Vail, the proposed development site is located within the General Use
(GU) District. The redevelopment includes the following:
• Two separate buildings (ToV municipal offices and MOB) to be
constructed.
• The medical office building (MOB) and the Town offices total
approximately 110,705 square feet of gross building space. (MOB 89,705
sq. ft. & TOV 21,000 sq. ft.)
• A new three to four story tall municipal office building and a five story tall
MOB.
• A +/-220 space below grade parking garage would be constructed to
accommodate the vehicle parking need an operated under a shared
arrangement.
• A shared loading and delivery site will be constructed to accommodate
delivers and trash removal.
• Pedestrian bridge over South Frontage Road to provide circulation
between MOB and VVMC.
• Helipad requires relocation at VVMC's expense.
• Mitigation of development impacts is required (i.e., employee housing,
traffic impact fee, art in public places, etc.).
• Development application fees, building permit and plan review fees, and
construction use tax payments are required.
• ToV to receive payment for land cost ($5 million) with a closing in March
2013.
• MOB office space to be owned by SC (46%) and VVMC (54%). A portion
of the office space is to be leased back to SPRI and HH.
• The ToV municipal offices are displaced for the duration of the
redevelopment project construction period (+/- 21 months).
• A total of 50 to 60 employees will be displaced during the construction
period.
• The continued operation of the police and emergency services dispatch
departments.
• Frontage Road median and turn lane improvements and other traffic
circulation improvements consistent with the Vail Transportation Master
Plan.
Town of Vail Page 2
• The relocation of the community recycling facilities to the RV lot at the
Lionshead Parking structure.
III. PROJECT GOALS
A series of project goals have been recommended to provide direction on
throughout the course of the entitlement and construction processes. On March
20th, the Vail Town Council adopted the following goals for the municipal building:
• Design anew office building for the Vail community that is indicative of the
Vail's brand, spirit & heritage
• Design a new office building for the town of Vail municipal corporation
which is highly functional, user-friendly, flexible & adaptable
• Design an energy efficient, cost effective, building that is representative of
the premiere international mountain resort community
• Design a new building that integrates with the neighboring mob facility and
is coordinated with the existing police department addition and all that
carries with it
• Design a building that ensures ease of access to local government
through improved customer service capabilities and more efficient and
productive consolidated operations
• Design a building which optimizes workflow, improves the delivery of
municipal government services and includes an increased presence and
use of technology
• Deliver a new home for the town's administration, community
development, economic development, finance, human resources,
informational technology, municipal court and police departments
IV. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
SECTION 12-2-2, DEFINITIONS
FACILITIES, HEALTHCARE: A facility principally engaged in providing services
for health maintenance, diagnosis or treatment of human diseases, pain, injury,
deformity, or physical condition.
ARTICLE 12-9C. GENERAL USE (GU) DISTRICT
12-9C-1: PURPOSE:
Town of Vail Page 3
The general use district is intended to provide sites for public and quasi -public
uses which, because of their special characteristics, cannot be appropriately
regulated by the development standards prescribed for other zoning districts, and
for which development standards especially prescribed for each particular
development proposal or project are necessary to achieve the purposes
prescribed in section 12-1-2 of this title and to provide for the public welfare. The
general use district is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and
certain types of quasi -public uses permitted in the district are appropriately
located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to
harmonize with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other
structures, to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities
appropriate to the permitted types of uses.
12-9C-2: PERMITTED USES (in part).-
The
art):
The following uses shall be permitted in the GU district.-
Communications
istrict:
Communications antennas and appurtenant equipment.
12-9C-3: CONDITIONAL USES.-
A.
SES:
A. Generally: The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the GU district,
subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions
of chapter 16 of this title.-
Healthcare
itle:
Healthcare facilities.
Helipad for emergency and/or community use.
Public buildings and grounds.
Public parking structure.
Public theaters, meeting rooms and convention facilities.
Public tourist/guest service related facilities.
Public unstructured parking.
12-9C-5: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.-
A.
TANDARDS:
A. Prescribed By Planning And Environmental Commission: In the general use
district, development standards in each of the following categories shall be as
prescribed by the planning and environmental commission:
1. Lot area and site dimensions.
2. Setbacks.
3. Building height.
4. Density control.
5. Site coverage.
6. Landscaping and site development.
7. Parking and loading.
Town of Vail Page 4
B. Reviewed By Planning And Environmental Commission: Development
standards shall be proposed by the applicant as apart of a conditional use permit
application. Site specific development standards shall then be determined by the
planning and environmental commission durinq the review of the conditional use
request in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title.
12-9C-6: ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.-
Additional
TANDARDS:
Additional regulations pertaining to site development standards and the
development of land in the general use district are found in chapter 14 of this
title.
VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
The review criteria and factors for consideration for a request of a conditional use
permit are established in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12-16,
Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code.
A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a conditional use permit application,
the planning and environmental commission shall consider the following
factors with respect to the proposed use.-
1.
se:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the
town.
2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities,
and other public facilities and public facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be
located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to
the proposed use.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an
environmental impact report is required by chapter 12 of this title.
Town of Vail Page 5
B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall
make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit.-
1.
ermit:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the
purposes of this title and the purposes of the zone district in which the site
is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable
provisions of this title.
IX. SCHEDULE
The development schedule milestones and durations are outlined below:
• Execute the memorandum of understanding
• Issue ToV Design RFP
• Design Development
• Final Legal Document Prep. (DA)
• ToV Entitlement
• Construction Documents (CD's)
• Final CDOT Approval
• ToV Office Relocation
• Construction
X. NEXT STEPS
Jan. 17, 2012
Jan. 20, 2012
Feb. 2012 — May 2012
Feb. 2012 — May 2012
Apr. 2012 — Aug. 2012
Aug. 2012 — Dec. 2012
Sept. 2012 — Apr. 2013
Apr. 2013 — Jan. 2015
May 2013 — Jan. 2015
A series of next steps have been identified for the project. The identified next
steps are intended to ensure the parties adhere to the project schedule. The
next steps include:
• Sign memorandum of understanding
• Authorization to issue design RFP
• Determine ToV development approach
• Negotiate the Development Agreement
• Finalize ToV program design
• CDOT Meeting
• Execute P&S agreement
• PEC work session
Jan.
17, 2012 (done)
Jan.
17, 2012 (done)
Mar.
20, 2012 (done)
Apr.
2012
July
2012
Apr.
2012
Apr.
2012
Apr.
9, 2012 (done)
Town of Vail Page 6
XI.
XII.
• PEC work session
• PEC work session
• PEC work session
• CUP application submittal
• PEC final review
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Apr. 23, 2012 (done)
May 14,2012(done)
June 25, 2012
July 2012
August 2012
The Community Development Department requests the Planning and
Environmental Commission tables this application to the July 9, 2012 meeting of
the Planning and Environmental Commission.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Proposed municipal building conceptual plans, dated June 25, 2012
B. Proposed medical building conceptual plans, dated June 25, 2012
C. Carl Walker parking demand study dated June 15, 2012
Town of Vail Page 7
Z
Q
J
a
0-
0 0
W
J H
LL a
O
z
J LU
LTJ
J
LTJ J
J a
H
� Q
Z
O m
O
H
J l7
O z
>�
LTJ D
H m
a u
LTJ
Z
Oz
uF-
N
X
W
z
O
F-
u
D
w
F -
Ln
z
O
u
3
W
z
z
0
J
D z
m O
LU u
J
O
CL N
z I O
H �
N
W
W I z
z
O
F-
u
D
w
F-
N
Z
O
u
3
W
z
66 z
v w
gz�
oma
�o
uo>
wUw
O
O
M
j
C�
Z
Q
J
a
O
O
J
LL
M
J
LTJ
LTJ
J
Z
O
H
D
J
O
LTJ
H
a
LLJ
V
Z
O
V
aovaaai
o
F— 3�tlaa31
F—
u u =w
o �N
u `
0 0
30 o
W w w -- -
U �U
o�
Qo®
'� 3�vaa� 3�vaa3i
O f
C�
a
p
W
1
�
J
a
f
u�
. z
;Z
i
z:
1
p
W
1
�
J
a
f
u�
. z
a�
V)
on
N
O
Z
Q
J
d
0
0
J
L.L.
N
L.L.
I
i
i
z�
wit
/
O /
Y J LL
O>N /
Z J Ill /
4r
/
/
/ ¢ W
/
F 11
Lo/ ��
. �
�
§
§
.
|
®R
�
§
!
�
�|
q
@
•
)q
�k/a �\|
��____-__
$
|§
■
i
D
ON
| @
_
* K
|t§2 <
2
<
�
|
;§E■
tH
■
09
`
�\,
<
§| \
-- %
\th
�
§ . c
c
(app z
Qa
<
§
V)
on
rn
0
z
a
J
d
O
O
J
L.L.
2
Li
O
D
O
ly
s
k
z
Q
J
d
m
N
0
V)
on
rn
0
z
a
J
d
0
0
J
LL.
2
H
LL.
LL.
0
2
D
O
LL.
w
ro
z
wQ
<
TF
s
❑ ❑
K 0
'1-6�7;� III
J
�7
Z
O
H
U
LTJ
N
W
V)
LU
V)
Z
Q
Z
O
H
U
LTJ
N
W
V)
LU
V)
Z
Q
a
fail
LL�Ll
"I,
m
-----------------
-
m
r�
r�
w -
/
z
-
Y
'
y
/
I
fIl�
r
r
I
I
A
I
%
0 '
/ I I
�
/ I
/
I I
r�
11 1
F—
LU w aoov
p o O
r �
z a
Z -
W
W
5/\0
V] 3r�v
U
Z
Y
O
w I l l
/
0 \
\
\
\
O
\
O
\
O \
O
0
/
/
U
O
O
Y
a
0
W Y Y
W Q Q
J � �
0
z
Q
r�
a �-
�a
�v
Qo
=a
V �
June 15, 2012
Mr. Mike Foster, AIA
Triumph, LLC
292 East Meadow Drive, Suite 101
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Vail Medical -Research -Municipal Development Parking Demand Study (DRAFT UPDATE)
Dear Mr. Foster,
In November 2011, Carl Walker, Inc. (Carl Walker) was commissioned by Triumph, LLC to
provide a parking demand analysis for the proposed Vail Medical -Research -Municipal
(VMRM) development project located between Interstate 70 and the I-70 Frontage Road in
Vail, Colorado. The proposed development is currently anticipated to include several
different land uses including medical office, medical research, city office spaces, and up to
263 parking spaces.
The scope of services for this project is summarized below:
• Review the proposed land uses and parking for the development using parking
requirements from the Town of Vail Zoning Ordinance and standards from the Urban
Land Institute (ULI).
• As appropriate, review potential parking demand reductions.
• Develop a shared parking model projecting anticipated parking occupancies for both
weekdays and weekends.
• Determine the number of parking spaces required to support the development based
on the best available data.
• Review the anticipated on-site parking supply for the development and compare it to
estimated parking demands.
• Provide a brief letter report that summarizes the results of the shared parking analysis.
This report represents the final deliverable for this project.
Summary of Development Information and Town of Vail Parking Requirements
The proposed development is currently anticipated to include the following land uses per the
June 15, 2012 design program provided by Triumph, LLC (Net Square Footage, or NSF, is based
on total occupied square footages noted in the June 15 design program):
• Steadman Clinic: 34,740 NSF
• Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI): 11,894 NSF
950 W. Elliot Rd., Suite 116 Tempe, AZ 85284 P. 480.505.0088 F. 480.505.0090 carlwalker.com
Triumph, LLC
VMRM Development -Vail, CO
Parking Demand Study (DRAFT UPDATE)
June 15, 2012
• Howard Head: 8,280 NSF
• Town of Vail Office: 16,500 NSF
• Parking: Up to 263 spaces (surface and underground parking)
Current standard zoning requirements for the proposed development are based on the Town
of Vail Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 10 (Schedule B). It is assumed that the Steadman Clinic
and Howard Head components are classified as standard medical office and the Town of Vail
component is classified as professional/business office. Based on the space uses included in
the latest concept design, it is assumed that the parking demands for the SPRI component will
more closely match professional/business office.
The standard requirements for the proposed development are as follows:
• Medical Office Building (MOB) Requirement:
o Code requires 1 parking space per 200 NSF for medical office:
■ Steadman Clinic: 174 spaces
■ Howard Head: 42 spaces
■ Total MOB Parking: 216 spaces
• Professional/Business Office Requirement:
o Code requires 1 parking space per 250 NSF for professional/business office:
■ SPRI: 48 spaces
■ Town of Vail: 66 spaces
■ Total MOB Parking: 1 14 spaces
The proposed VMRM development has a total estimated standard code parking requirement
of 330 spaces based on the latest design program. This estimate is based on code only and
does not include additional adjustments for shared parking, vehicle ownership, captive
market, or anticipated drive ratios.
Estimated Parking Demand for the Proposed Development
A shared parking model is typically used to more accurately estimate parking demands for a
mixed-use development. Shared parking is defined as parking that can serve more than one
single land use, without conflict. Shared parking is generally applied to mixed-use
developments composed of several different land uses (e.g., retail, residential, restaurant,
office, and/or hotels) that are significantly integrated. Using the shared parking model
reduces the amount of parking needed for a mixed-use development as the effect of sharing
parking requires fewer spaces than the sum of the parking needed for the individual land uses.
This analysis calculates the parking needed based on the projected land uses in the
development and estimates a hypothetical parking accumulation throughout a typical
weekday and weekend day (6:00 a.m. through 12:00 a.m.).
Page 2 of 8
Triumph, LLC
VMRM Development -Vail, CO
Parking Demand Study (DRAFT UPDATE)
June 15, 2012
Captive markets can also significantly reduce parking demand for a mixed-use development.
Captive market, also known as "market synergy," refers to a reduction in parking due to the
proximity of land uses that allow individuals to walk between destinations in a single trip. For
instance, residents that are already present on-site will patronize a development's restaurants
and retail stores. The use of alternative modes of transportation such as carpooling, public
transportation, walking, bicycling, etc. should also be considered in a shared parking analysis.
In order to determine the estimated percentage of development employees and visitors that
will drive to the site and park, Carl Walker reviewed available United States census data,
information provided by Triumph, LLC and OZ Architecture, and available ULI information.
Based on our review of available information, the following assumptions are used to determine
shared parking demands:
• Drive ratio (modal split) and vehicle ownership assumptions:
o According to US Census data for Vail, 70.3% of workers drive to work (either alone
or in carpools). Therefore, it could be assumed that only 70.3% of development
employees will drive to the development and park. However, a more
conservative drive ratio of 75% is all that is allowed by the Town of Vail. It is
anticipated that the development will include amenities designed to encourage
the use of alternatives forms of transportation. In addition, the proposed
development is located on an existing Vail Transit route.
o According to US Census data for Vail, 2.9% of households do not own a vehicle.
Therefore, it is assumed that 97.1% of patients and visitors will drive to the
development and park.
o According to information provided by Triumph, LLC (based on information
provided by the Steadman Clinic), 35% of Steadman Clinic patients will be from
out of town. These patients will likely use other forms of transportation to travel
to/from the clinic (e.g., hotel shuttles). However, the Town of Vail only allows for
a drive ratio of 75%. Therefore, it is conservatively assumed that 75% of
Steadman Clinic patients/visitors will drive to the development and park.
• Non -captive market assumptions:
o Based on development land uses, there does not appear to be any significant
captive market impacts. Therefore, non -captive market assumptions are as
follows (percentage of people that are not already counted in the demands for
another land use, by user group):
■ MOB Patients: 100%
■ MOB Employees: 100%
■ Office Visitors: 100%
■ Office Employees: 100%
Page 3 of 8
Triumph, LLC
VMRM Development -Vail, CO
Parking Demand Study (DRAFT UPDATE)
June 15, 2012
Base Parking Estimate per ULI
The following table (Table 1) illustrates the base parking demand per Town of Vail Zoning
Ordinance requirement ratios. The estimated base parking demand for the proposed
development is 330 parking spaces. Adjustments for captive market effects, drive ratios, and
shared parking will need to be included to better reflect market conditions.
Table 1.
Base Parking Requirements per Vail Zoning Code
Land Use
Quantity
Parking Demand Ratios 2
Required
Parking
Steadman Clinic
34,740 sq.ft.
5.00 spaces/1,000 sq. ft.
174
SPRI
11,894 sq.ft.
4.00 spaces/1,000 sq. ft.
48
Howard Head
8,280 sq.ft.
5.00 spaces/1,000 sq. ft.
42
Town of Vail
16,500 sq.ft.
4.00 spaces/1,000 sq. ft.
66
Total:
330
(1) Square footages shown in table are net square footages shown in the June 15,
2012 design program provided by Triumph, LLC.
(2) Demand ratios are based on Schedule B ratios in Chapter 10 of the Town of
Vail zoning code.
Captive Market and Modal Split Adjustments
Table 2 separates the base parking estimate for the individual land uses into patient/visitor and
employee components based on user group breakdowns presented in ULI's Shared Parking -
2nd Edition. The table also includes the estimated captive market and drive ratio (modal split)
adjustments previously noted that reduce overall parking needs.
Table 2.
Revised Parking Demand Estimate with Captive Market and Drive Ratio Adjustments
(1) Estimate of Patient/Visitor versus Employee parking demand for the Steadman Clinic and Howard Head
based on approximate ULI user group breakdown for medical office (67% Patient/Visitor and 33% Employee).
Estimate of Visitor versus Employee demand for SPRI and the Town of Vail based on approximate ULI user group
breakdown for office (8% Visitor and 92% Employee).
Page 4 of 8
Revised
Patient/
Drive
Non -Captive
Patient/
Drive
Revised
Total
Visitor
Ratio
Market
Visitor
Employee
Ratio
Employee
Revised
Land Use
Parking
Factor
Factor
Parking
Parking
Factor
Parking
Parking
Steadman Clinic
117
0.75
1.00
88
57
0.75
43
131
SPRI
4
0.97
1.00
4
44
0.75
33
37
Howard Head
28
0.97
1.00
28
14
0.75
11
39
Town of Vail
6
0.97
1.00
6
60
0.75
45
51
Total:
155
126
1 175
132
1 258
(1) Estimate of Patient/Visitor versus Employee parking demand for the Steadman Clinic and Howard Head
based on approximate ULI user group breakdown for medical office (67% Patient/Visitor and 33% Employee).
Estimate of Visitor versus Employee demand for SPRI and the Town of Vail based on approximate ULI user group
breakdown for office (8% Visitor and 92% Employee).
Page 4 of 8
Triumph, LLC
VMRM Development —Vail, CO
Parking Demand Study (DRAFT UPDATE)
June 15, 2012
There is an estimated adjusted parking demand for 126 patient/visitor parking spaces and 132
employee parking spaces. As previously described, it is estimated that between 3% and 25%
of patients/visitors and 25% of employees will use an alternative mode of transportation such
as bicycling, walking, mass transit, shuttle, or carpool (drive ratio factors of .97 and .75). The
total revised parking demand estimate is 258 parking spaces, not including any additional
adjustments for shared parking (time of day and seasonal parking demand adjustments).
Hourly and Monthly Variations in Parking Demand - Shared Parking Estimate
Table 3 illustrates hourly variations in parking accumulation as a percent of the peak
accumulation (100%) for the land uses included in the development during weekdays. All of
the percentages are taken from Shared Parking - 2nd Edition and based on data collected
from hundreds of mixed-use development projects throughout the country.
Table 3.
Hourly Variations in Parking Demand - Weekdays (From Shared Parking, 2nd Edition)
Hour
Steadman Clinic
SPRI
Howard Head
Town of Vail
Patient Employee
Visitor Employee
Patient Employee
Visitor Employee
6:00 AM
Oho
Oho
Oho
3%
Oho
Oho
Oho
3%
7:00 AM
Oho
Oho
1 %
30%
Oho
Oho
1 %
30%
8:00 AM
90%
60%
20%
75%
90%
60%
20%
75%
9:00 AM
900
100%
600
950
900
100%
600
950
10:00 AM
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
11:00 AM
100%
l00 0
45%
100%
l00 0
100%
45%
100%
12:00 PM
30%
100%
15%
90%
30%
100%
15%
90%
1:00 PM
90%
100%
45%
90%
90%
100%
45%
90%
2:00 PM
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
3:00 PM
100%
100%
45%
100%
100%
100%
45%
100%
4:00 PM
90%
100%
15%
90%
90%
100%
15%
90%
5:00 PM
800
1000
100
500
800
1000
100
500
6:00 PM
67%
67%
5%
25%
67%
67%
5%
25%
7:00 PM
30%
30%
2%
10%
30%
30%
2%
10%
8:00 PM
15%
15%
1 %
7%
15%
15%
1 %
7%
9:00 PM
Oho
Oho
Oho
3%
Oho
Oho
Oho
3%
10:00 PM
Oho
Oho
Oho
1 %
Oho
Oho
Oho
1 %
11:00 PM
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
12:00 AM
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
Oho
Table 4 (next page) applies the hourly accumulation adjustments shown in Table 3 to the
revised parking demands calculated in Table 2. The peak parking demand is projected to
occur during weekdays at 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.
Page 5 of 8
Triumph, LLC
VMRM Development -Vail, CO
Parking Demand Study (DRAFT UPDATE)
June 15, 2012
Table 4.
Parking Demand by User Group and Hour - Weekdays
Peak Hour
The final adjustment is for monthly variations in parking demand. Table 5 (next page) illustrates
monthly variations in parking accumulation as a percent of the peak accumulation for the
land uses included in the development (per ULI).
Page 6 of 8
Steadman
Clinic
SPRI
Howard
Head
Town
of Vail
Hour
Total
Patient Employee
Visitor Employee
Patient Employee
Visitor Employee
6:00 AM
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
3
7:00 AM
0
0
1
10
0
0
1
14
26
8:00 AM
80
26
1
25
26
7
2
34
201
9:00 AM
1 80
43
3
32
26
11
4
43
242
10:00 AM
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
11:00 AM
88
43
2
33
28
11
3
45
253
12:00 PM
27
43
1
30
9
11
1
41
163
1:00 PM
80
43
2
30
26
11
3
41
236
2:00 PM
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
3:00 PM
88
43
2
33
28
11
3
45
253
4:00 PM
80
43
1
30
26
11
1
41
233
5:00 PM
71
43
1
17
23
11
1
23
190
6:00 PM
59
29
1
9
19
8
1
12
138
7:00 PM
27
13
1
4
9
4
1
5
64
8:00 PM
14
7
1
3
5
2
1
4
37
9:00 PM
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
3
10:00 PM
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
11:00 PM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12:00 AM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour
The final adjustment is for monthly variations in parking demand. Table 5 (next page) illustrates
monthly variations in parking accumulation as a percent of the peak accumulation for the
land uses included in the development (per ULI).
Page 6 of 8
Triumph, LLC
VMRM Development -Vail, CO
Parking Demand Study (DRAFT UPDATE)
June 15, 2012
Table 5.
Monthly Variations in Parking Demand - Weekdays (From Shared Parking, 2nd Edition)
Month
Steadman Clinic
Visitor
SPRI
Howard Head
Town of Vail
Patient Employee
Visitor Employee
Patient Employee
Visitor Employee
January
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
February
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
March
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
April
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
May
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
June
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
July
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
August
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
95%
September
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
October
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
November
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
December
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
Using the hourly peak accumulation of vehicles per land use as highlighted in Table 4 (10:00
a.m. and 2:00 p.m.), Table 6 applies the monthly variation percentages shown in Table 5.
Table 6.
Parking Demand by User Group and Month - Weekdays at 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM
Month
Steadman Clinic
Patient Employee
Visitor
SPRI
Employee
Howard Head
Patient Employee
Town of Vail
Visitor Employee
Total
January
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
February
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
March
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
April
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
May
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
June
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
July
August
84
84
41
41
4
4
32
32
27
27
11
11
6
6
43
43
248
248
September
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
October
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
November
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
December
88
43
4
33
28
11
6
45
258
Peak Month
Based on the ULI shared parking methodology (using Town of Vail parking requirements), the
proposed development has an estimated peak parking demand of 258 parking spaces at
10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. on weekdays. This peak demand is composed of 126 patient/visitor
parking spaces and 132 employee parking spaces. The final estimated shared parking
demand represents a reduction of approximately 22% from the base Town of Vail parking
Page 7 of 8
Triumph, LLC
VMRM Development -Vail, CO
Parking Demand Study (DRAFT UPDATE)
June 15, 2012
requirement estimate of 330 parking spaces. As the peak parking demands for the land uses
occur at the some time, there are no shared parking reductions estimated (only reductions
due to estimated drive ratios).
The estimated peak parking demand includes the full NSF for the development. The
development includes town council chamber space that may be used primarily during
evening hours. Therefore, the potential peak parking demand for this portion of the
development may occur outside of the peak periods of parking demand for the development
as a whole (weekdays at 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.). The size and use of the chamber space
will need to be verified prior to any additional reductions of estimated peak daytime parking
demands.
As the development is immediately surrounded by areas designated as "Commercial Core," it
is likely that the parking demands for the development could be similar to adjacent properties.
If this is the case, the parking requirements shown in Schedule A of Chapter 10 could better
predict development demands. The estimated parking requirement for the development
using Schedule A ratios would be 195 spaces. No additional reductions would be
recommended as it is assumed that the reduced Schedule A ratios already account for
alternative modes of transportation. The possibility of using the Schedule A ratios will need to
be verified with the Town of Vail prior to applying them to the development.
Summary of Findings
Based on our review of the proposed development, existing Town of Vail zoning requirements,
and available parking demand related information, Carl Walker recommends that a minimum
of 258 parking spaces be provided to support the project. As the development is currently
anticipated to provide up to 263 parking spaces, the current projected parking supply should
be sufficient to support anticipated demands.
Any future changes in the land uses associated with the proposed development, or changes
in prevailing market conditions, could positively or negatively impact the parking demand
estimates contained in this report.
Thank you very much for providing Carl Walker with this opportunity to be of service. Please let
me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Matthew Q. Inman
Vice President, Studies and Operations Consulting
Page 8 of 8
0
rowN OF vain
Memorandum
To: Planning and Environmental Commission
From: Community Development Department
Date: June 25, 2012
Subject: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed
regulations amendment, pursuant to 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to
allow for amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, to amend the
development review process, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC120010)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond
PROBLEM STATEMENT
The purpose of this work session is to discuss the potential for streamlining the
development review process, which can be described through the following problem
statement:
Problem Statement: The Town's first zoning code was adopted in 1969,
and since then, the code has been amended hundreds of times. Most
amendments were made one at a time and as a reactive response to a
present concern. Thirty years of amendments have taken a toll on the
Town's zoning code, specifically the development review process. The
processes required for various applications range from staff review to
Town Council review, with variations on each process depending on the
zone district. As a result, the development review process is complicated,
confusing, fragmented and cumbersome. Further, in a recent community
survey, respondents identified the development review process as
complicated and lengthy.
As this is a work session, Staff requests the Planning and Environmental Commission
listen to the presentation, ask any pertinent questions and provide input on the problem
statement and project goals. Further, Staff requests this item be tabled to the July 9,
2012 hearing.
II. GOALS
In order to address the issues identified in the problem statement, the following are
goals of this project in no particular order:
1. Identify processes that may be amended.
2. Streamline the process and procedures for development review.
3. Ensure consistency among regulations and planning documents.
4. Increase efficiencies and cost savings in the development review process.
5. Eliminate outdated, ineffective and unnecessary provisions within the
development titles.
6. Reaffirm existing policies and adopt new policies to clarify direction.
7. Ensure support from the community through public process.
8. Maintain the quality and safety of development in Vail.
Question for PEC: Are there any other goals that should be included?
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESSES
The following is a summary of development review processes, arranged by the extent of
review, including the roles of Staff, the Planning and Environmental Commission,
Design Review Board and the Town Council. Staff will conduct a discussion in the
hearing to evaluate which processes can be amended.
1. The following processes require Staff review, Planning and Environmental
Commission recommendation and Town Council determination:
• Text Amendments to Title 11, Sign Regulations, Title 12, Zoning Regulations,
Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, Title 14, Development Standards, and all
components of the Vail Comprehensive Plan (Vail Village Master Plan,
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, etc.)
• Zone District Amendments
• Development Plan for establishment of Commercial Service Center District
• Development Plan for Ski Base Recreation 1 District
• Establishment of Special Development Districts
• Major amendments to Special Development Districts and development plan in
Ski Base Recreation District (Any proposal to change uses; increase gross
residential floor area; change the number of dwelling or accommodation units;
modify, enlarge or expand any approved special development district)
2. The following processes require Staff review and Planning and Environmental
Commission determination:
• Development Plan in the Housing District (including determination of setbacks,
density and height) and Ski Base Recreation 2 District
• Major amendment to development plan in Ski Base Recreation 2 District (any
proposal to change uses; increases to residential floor area greater than five
Town of Vail Page 2
percent (5%) of the approved square footage; increases to retail, office, or
common floor area greater than five percent (5%) of the approved square
footage; increases or decreases to the number of dwelling, accommodation, or
fractional fee club units; any request to modify, enlarge or expand the boundary
of an approved development plan and any amendment to the approved
development plan that is not a minor amendment)
• Exterior Alteration (increase in dwelling units, accommodation units, fractional fee
units, addition of 1,000 sq ft of commercial or common space, or projects with
substantial off site impacts as determined by the administrator) in Public
Accommodations, Lionshead Mixed Use -1, Lionshead Mixed Use -2, Public
Accommodations -2 Districts
• Exterior Alteration (new building, addition or removal of any enclosed floor area,
alteration of roofline, new or modified outdoor dining deck) in Commercial Core
1, Commercial Core 2 Districts
• General Circulation Plan in Arterial Business District- New Building or change to
district
• Variances
• Conditional Use Permits (see Attachment A for list of conditional uses by zone
district- Underlined land uses under consideration for permitted use)
3. The following process requires a Staff determination report to the Planning and
Environmental Commission:
• Minor amendments to Special Development Districts and minor amendment to
development plan in Ski Base Recreation and Ski Base Recreation 2 Districts
(modifications to building plans, site or landscape plans that do not alter the basic
intent and character of the approved special development district, and are
consistent with the design criteria including, but not limited to, variations of not
more than five feet (5') to approved setbacks and/or building footprints; changes
to landscape or site plans that do not adversely impact pedestrian or vehicular
circulation throughout the special development district, or changes to gross floor
area (excluding residential uses) of not more than 5% the approved square
footage of retail, office, common areas and other nonresidential floor area)
• Conditional use permit amendment (such as addition to building, change to
operations, change to conditions of approval if administrator determines change
is in accordance with Comp Plan, do not alter basic character or intent, and will
not adversely affect public health safety and welfare)
4. The following processes require Staff review and Design Review Board
determination:
• New Construction
• Additions that alter architectural design
• DRB applications associated with development plans in the Housing &
Commercial Service Center Districts and exterior alterations in PA, PA -2, CC1,
CC2, LMU-1 & LMU-2 Districts
5. The following processes require Staff determination only:
Town of Vail Page 3
• Administrative Determinations (interpretations of Vail Town Code)
• Home Occupation Permits
• Parking Space Leasing Permit
• Staff approvable Design Review applications, including modifications to buildings
consistent with architectural design, modification to landscaping and site
improvements
6. The following processes require Staff determination only and are available to be
issued over the counter:
• Reroof in single family and duplexes that meet certain criteria
7. The following processes require Town Council review only:
• Determination of Similar Use (land use is similar to existing and permitted)
CONDITIONAL USES
1. Bed and breakfasts: This is a conditional use in all districts that allow residential
uses. The definition of bed and breakfast in Section 12-2-2, Vail Town Code, is as
follows:
BED AND BREAKFAST: A business which accommodates guests in a dwelling
unit in which the bed and breakfast proprietor lives on the premises and is in
residence during the bed and breakfast use.
Since 1990, only one bed and breakfast conditional use permit has been applied for,
and the application was withdrawn prior to PEC review. Bed and breakfasts
generate sales and lodging tax, and turn dwelling units into warm beds with
increased occupancy. Staff recommends that this use could be a permitted use with
use specific criteria. Should the bed and breakfast not meet the use specific criteria,
it would be a conditional use that would be reviewed by the PEC.
The existing use specific criteria found in Section 12-14-18, Vail Town Code, are as
follows:
12-14-18: BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATIONS:
A. Definition: See section 12-2-2 of this title for definition of "bed and breakfast".
B. Location And Criteria: Bed and breakfast operations may be allowed as a
conditional use in those zone districts as specified in this title. If permitted as a
conditional use pursuant to chapter 16 of this title, bed and breakfast operations
shall be subject to the following requirements.-
1.
equirements:1. Off street designated parking shall be required as follows: one space for the
owner/proprietor plus one space for the first bedroom rented plus one-half (1/2)
space for each additional bedroom rented.
2. Enclosed trash facilities and regular garbage removal service shall be
provided.
Town of Vail Page 4
3. Removal of landscaping for the provision of additional parking is strongly
discouraged.
4. Each bed and breakfast shall be allowed one residential "nameplate" sign as
defined and regulated by the town sign code.
5. If a bed and breakfast operation shall use property or facilities owned in
common or jointly with other property owners such as parking spaces or a
driveway in duplex subdivision, by way of example, and not limitation, the written
approval of the other property owner, owners, or applicable owners' association
shall be required to be submitted with the application for a conditional use permit.
6. A bed and breakfast operation may short term rent separately up to three (3)
bedrooms or a maximum square footage of nine hundred (900) square feet of the
dwelling unit. Bed and breakfast operations shall only be permitted to
accommodate a "family" as defined in section 12-2-2 of this title.
C. Compliance: It shall be unlawful for a bed and breakfast operation to do
business without a conditional use permit from the planning and environmental
commission after June 12, 1990, or to operate in violation of any of the provisions
of this code.
D. Discontinuance: Any bed and breakfast operation which is discontinued for a
period of twelve (12) months, regardless of any intent to resume operation of
use, shall not be resumed thereafter, and any future use of the site or structures
thereon shall conform to the provisions of this title.
E. Review Of Decision: The town council, the applicant, adjacent property owner
or the town manager, may appeal/call up to the town council for review any
decision made by the planning and environmental commission regarding a
conditional use permit for bed and breakfast as per section 12-3-3 of this title.
Staff recommends the following use specific criteria for bed and breakfasts as a
permitted use:
1. Bed and breakfasts shall have a manager that lives on site during operation
of the bed and breakfast.
2. Bed and breakfast operations shall be limited to up to 4 bedrooms for guests.
3. Parking requirements shall be met on-site with one space for the manager
plus one-half of a parking space per bedroom that is part of the bed and
breakfast operation.
4. Trash shall be enclosed within the structure or within a wildlife resistant
enclosure, per Section 5-9-2 of this Code.
5. Signage shall be limited to one residential nameplate, per Title 11, Sign
Regulations.
6. The applicant shall obtain written approval from the joint property owner or
homeowners association, where applicable, in order to obtain a business
license.
7. Bed and breakfasts shall not significantly negatively impact adjacent
properties. Should any significant negative impacts occur, such as traffic,
Town of Vail Page 5
noise, etc., to adjacent properties, those properties may appeal the Staff
determination of compliance to the Vail Town Council.
The recommended use specific criteria differ from the regulatory criteria in number of
bedrooms and on-site management. Staff recommends the number of bedrooms be
increased from three to four with no square footage requirements to accommodate
larger groups, such as families. Staff also recommends that the required owner on
site be amended to the term manager, which will allow a non -owner to be the on-site
employee.
2. Communications antennas and appurtenant equipment are a conditional use in
the HR, SFR, R, PS, RC, MDMF, HDMF, PA, CSC, ABD, HS, LMU-1, LMU-2, A,
OR, SBR, SBR2 and P Districts. The use is permitted in the H, CC3, and GU
Districts. The only specific regulations regarding communication antennas is as
follows:
14-10-12: COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNAS AND APPURTENANT
EQUIPMENT: Communications antennas and any associated appurtenant
equipment should be integrated into existing principal buildings and structures.
All antennas and appurtenant equipment shall be located and screened so as not
to detract from the overall site design quality.
This use accounts for ten of the 147 conditional use permits that were applied for
since 1990. All of these CUPs were approved, with the following conditions as
examples:
• Plant additional landscaping. Any removal of landscaping shall be replaced.
• The applicant is required to provide adequate provisions to screen the
equipment.
• Equipment shall not be located within the setbacks.
• The applicant uses only non-combustible materials in the construction of the
screen wall and ladder enclosure.
• The applicant shall comply with outdoor lighting regulations.
• The applicant shall remove any obsolete telecommunications equipment prior
to requesting final Town of Vail construction inspection.
• Approval of this conditional use permit is contingent upon the applicant
obtaining Town of Vail design review approval for this proposal.
• Applicant must paint or repair all visible rusty elements on the tower.
With the proliferation of antennas to support growing cellular phone networks, Staff
recommends that this use be a permitted use with use specific criteria that will be
subject to review by the Design Review Board. The Design Review Board will be
able to enact the same conditions that have been required by the Planning and
Environmental Commission as part of CUPs. Note that this use has been changed
to a permitted use in the Housing (H) District to accommodate the many antennas at
Middle Creek. In those applications, the Design Review Board required numerous
conditions regarding landscaping, screening and painting. Staff recommends that
Town of Vail Page 6
the following use specific criteria be applied to communications antennas as a
permitted use:
1. Communications antennas and any associated appurtenant equipment
should be integrated into existing principal buildings and structures.
2. All antennas and appurtenant equipment shall be located and screened so as
not to detract from the overall site design quality.
3. Any trees that are removed to facilitate installation shall be replaced with the
same number and overall height of trees.
4. Communications antennas shall not be located in setbacks.
5. Any obsolete communications antennas and appurtenant equipment shall be
removed within thirty days of ceasing use.
6. The subject property shall comply with outdoor lighting regulations.
7. All communications antennas shall be painted to match the exterior materials
of the structure or be enclosed with materials that match existing materials.
8. Any equipment on the ground shall be enclosed with fencing, walls or
landscaping.
9. Communications antennas and appurtenant equipment shall be considered
an architectural projection in determination of height, which shall be permitted
to exceed maximum height by 25%, nor more than 15 feet, whichever is more
restrictive.
3. Indoor Entertainment: Major arcades are a conditional use in PA, CC1 (basement),
CC3, CSC, LMU-1 (basement and 1 st floor), LMU-2 (basement and 1 st floor), Parking
and GU. The definition of major arcades is as follows:
MAJOR ARCADE: A place of business where an individual, association,
partnership or corporation maintains five (5) or more amusement devices.
Amusement devices are defined as follows.-
AMUSEMENT
ollows:
AMUSEMENT DEVICE: Any device which upon insertion of a coin, slug, token,
plate or disc, or payment of consideration may be used by the public for use as a
game, entertainment, amusement, a test of skill, either mental or physical,
whether or not registering a score, which shall include, but shall not be limited to:
pool tables, snooker tables, foosball tables, pinball machines, electronic games,
fixed stand coin operated kiddie rides, and mechanical bulls, but shall not include
radios, devices that provide music only, or television carrying commercial
broadcasts.
The use specific criteria for major arcades are as follows:
a. No exterior frontage on any public way, street, walkway, or mall area is
permitted.
b. Amusement devices shall not be visible or audible from any public way,
street, walkway, or mall area.
Town of Vail Page 7
Currently, minor arcades (with less than 5 amusement devices) are permitted as an
accessory use in the H, PA, CC1, CC2, CC3, CSC, ABD, LMU-1, LMU-2, Parking
and GU Districts. Minor arcades are a conditional use in the Ski Base Recreation
District. Bowling alleys are a conditional use in the CSC District. Theaters are a
conditional use in the CSC, ABD, PA, CC1 (basement, 2nd floor and above), CC2,
CC3, LMU-1, LMU-2 (basement and 2nd floor and above), PA -2 and GU.
Staff recommends that major arcade, minor arcade, bowling alleys, movie theaters
and similar uses be combined to form the land use "Indoor Entertainment."
Combination of all entertainment uses into one land use will simplify the regulations
and allow for more creativity in land uses. It will also promote the existence of this
land use, which is currently heavily regulated by requiring conditional use permits.
This will facilitate increased activities for guests and residents, which will keep them
in Vail rather than going down valley for these types of uses.
Staff recommends that "Indoor Entertainment" be a permitted use in all commercial
districts, with the criteria that "Amusement devices shall not be visible or audible
from any public way, street, walkway, or mall area." The use specific criteria that
does not allow exterior frontage on any public way, street, walkway or mall area
should be applicable to indoor entertainment in the CC1, CC2, CSC, LMU-1 and
LMU-2 District (which make up the commercial cores). All other commercial districts
would be exempt from this requirement. As with other permitted uses with use
specific criteria, should the use not meet the criteria, it would be considered a
conditional use.
4. Brewpubs are a conditional use in the CC3, CSC, ABD, LMU-1, LMU-2 and SBR2
Districts. Brewpubs are defined as follows:
BREWPUB: An eating place which includes the brewing of beer as an accessory
use. The brewing operation processes water, malt, hops, and yeast into beer or
ale by mashing, cooking, and fermenting. The area used for brewing, including
bottling and kegging, shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the total floor area of
the commercial space. The brewery shall not produce more than seven thousand
five hundred (7,500) barrels of beer or ale per year. A barrel is equivalent to thirty
one (31) gallons.
The use specific criteria for brewpubs are as follows:
c. There shall be no exterior storage of supplies, refuse, or materials on the
property upon which the brewpub is operated.
d. The operator of the brewpub shall comply with the town's loading and delivery
regulations as set forth in this title.
e. Brewpubs which sell beer or ale at wholesale or which sell beer for off site
consumption are allowed so long as the total of wholesale sales and sales for
off site consumption do not exceed forty five percent (45%) of the product
manufactured by the brewpub on an annual basis.
Town of Vail Page 8
In all of the districts that allow brewpubs as a conditional use, other eating and
drinking establishments are a permitted use. Many of the criteria for brewpubs are
difficult if not impossible to police, including limitations on wholesale sales and
production. Staff recommends that brewpubs be a permitted use with the following
use specific criteria:
1. Brewpubs shall limit the area used for brewing, including bottling and kegging, to
less than fifty percent (50%) of the total floor area.
2. There shall be no exterior storage of supplies or materials on the property upon
which the brewpub is operated.
5. Liquor Stores are a conditional use in CC1, ABD, LMU-1 and LMU-2 Districts.
Liquor stores are a permitted use in the CC3 and CSC Districts. Liquor stores do
not have any use specific criteria, and criteria placed on liquor stores in the past
includes obtaining a license to operate and compliance with the Sign Regulations.
Because retail is a permitted use in these zone districts, Staff recommends that
liquor stores be a permitted use in the CC1, CC2, ADB, LMU-1, and LMU-2 Districts
(on al floors). No use specific criteria are necessary since a liquor license is
required by the State, and compliance with the Sign Regulations is required of all
businesses.
6. Electronic sales and repair shops are a conditional use in the basement level of
the CC1 District. Staff believes that this specific use should be eliminated and
included in either retail or personal services, depending on the business. Both retail
and personal services are permitted uses on the basement level of the CC1 District.
7. Household appliance stores are a conditional use on all levels in the CC1 District.
In the CC1 District, retail is a permitted use on the basement, first and second floors
and a conditional use above the second floor. It is a permitted use in the CC3, ABD
and CSC Districts. This use is a specific type of retail, and Staff recommends that
this use be eliminated and permitted wherever retail is permitted.
8. Luggage stores are a conditional use on the basement, second floor and above in
the CC1 District. They are a permitted use on the first floor of the CC1 District and
all floors in the CSC District. This use is a specific type of retail, and Staff
recommends that this use be eliminated and permitted wherever retail is permitted.
Retail is permitted on the basement, first, and second floors in CC1 and a
conditional use above the second floor in CC1, as well as all floors in the CSC
District.
9. Meeting rooms are a conditional use on all floors in the CC2, CC3, CSC, LMU-1
and LMU-2 Districts, and in the basement and on the second floor in the CC1
District. Meeting rooms are listed as an accessory use in the PA and PA -2 Districts.
"Meeting rooms for owner use and community oriented organizations" is a permitted
use in the SBR District. Staff recommends that this use be considered accessory in
all districts, and should stand alone meeting rooms be built, this would fall under
rooms institutional uses, which is a conditional use in all of the commercial and
business districts.
Town of Vail Page 9
10.Outdoor patios, outdoor dining areas and outdoor dining decks are listed as
conditional in the SBR2 District, and are listed as accessory to eating and drinking
establishments in the HDMF, CC1, CC2, PA, PA -2, LMU-1 and LMU-2 Districts. In
the CC1 and CC2 Districts, outdoor dining decks are subject to PEC review when
first constructed and any modification. Staff recommends that alterations to existing
decks be under DRB review. Staff recommends that these uses be combined and
fall under accessory uses for all of these districts. Staff recommends the following
use specific criteria for all outdoor dining areas:
1. Outdoor dining decks shall be on the property of the business.
2. If proposed outdoor dining decks are on Town of Vail property, the applicant
shall obtain permission to use the Town property from the Vail Town Council.
3. Deck shall comply with noise ordinance of the Vail Town Code.
4. Outdoor dining decks shall not block any egress or windows of other
businesses unless the applicant obtains permission from the adjacent
business owner.
11. Massage parlors are a conditional use in the Commercial Core 3 District. This is
the only district that specifically calls out massage parlors, rather than the more
general land use "personal services." This use is permitted in the CC3 District, and
massage parlors should fall under that same land use category.
12. Professional offices, business offices and studios are a conditional use on the
second floor in the LMU-1 and LMU-2 Districts. This use is not permitted on the first
floor. Staff recommends that this use become a permitted use on the second floor in
the LMU-1 and LMU-2 Districts in order to facilitate more office space within the
Town, specifically in the Lionshead commercial core.
13. Seasonal uses or structures typically have meant tents for special events and
parties. When on public property, an event can obtain a special event permit that
allows for tents. However, when events are solely on private property, tents are
regulated by the zoning regulations with this use. Seasonal uses or structures is
defined as
"SEASONAL USE OR STRUCTURE: A temporary covering erected to
accommodate or extend educational, recreational, and cultural activities. Such
temporary coverings may not be in place for more than seven (7) consecutive
months of any twelve (12) month period. For the purposes of this title,
a seasonal use or structure shall not constitute site coverage and shall not be
subject to building bulk control standards. Any seasonal use or structure is
subject to design review."
In addition to design review, "Seasonal use or structure" is a conditional use in OR
District. "Seasonal uses or structures utilized for more than fourteen (14) days" are
a conditional use in the LMU-1 District. "Seasonal structures to accommodate
athletic, cultural, or educational activities" is a conditional use in SBR District.
Town of Vail Page 10
"Seasonal structures or uses to accommodate educational, recreational or cultural
activities" are a conditional use in the GU District. "Accessory buildings (permanent
and temporary) and uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or
conditional outdoor recreational uses, and necessary for the operation thereof,
including restrooms, drinking fountains, bleachers, concessions, storage buildings,
and similar uses" is a conditional in OR District.
Conditions that have been placed on seasonal uses (tents) since 1990:
• All equipment must be screened.
• The hours of operation shall be limited from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm, seven days a
week.
• The Noise Ordinance of the Town of Vail shall be met.
• The applicant shall obtain a Town of Vail building permit prior to erecting the tent.
• The applicant shall install a minimum of six, 50 -gallon planting pots, containing a
combination of evergreen trees and flower plants in each pot, in association with
the seasonal structure location. (tent on Lionshead Parking Structure)
Staff recommends that the use specific criteria for tents include the first four items on
the historical conditions, with the design review board having authority over whether
additional temporary or permanent landscaping is necessary to offset the impact of
the tent. This means temporary structures would only be reviewed by the DRB.
Staff also recommends that for temporary structures that are up for less than a
week, Staff should have the authority to approve applications rather than take the
application to the DRB. Staff also recommends that additional zone districts be
permitted to have this use, including HDMF, MDMF, P, and LMU-2 Districts.
14. Any use within public parks, recreation areas, and open spaces which
involves assembly of more than two hundred (200) persons together in one
building or group of buildings, or in one recreation area or other public
recreational facility is a conditional use in the Agriculture and Open Space District.
This is a difficult land use to quantify because of the broad nature of how many
people can occupy open spaces. Staff recommends that the design review board
review any uses of this nature, with the remainder of the conditional uses in the A
District remaining for PEC review.
IV. NEXT STEPS
Staff requests the Planning and Environmental Commission provide input on the
problem statement, project goals and items outlined in this memorandum. Further, Staff
requests the PEC tables this item to the July 9, 2012 hearing for further discussion.
Town of Vail Page 11
rowx of va
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
May 21, 2012 at 1:OOpm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road W. - Vail, Colorado, 81657
**Order and times of agenda items are subject to change**
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Susan Bird Pam Hopkins
Luke Cartin
Michael Kurz
Bill Pierce
Henry Pratt
John Rediker
20 minutes
A request for a variance from Chapter 14-5, Parking Lot and Parking Structure Design Standards
for All Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 14-1-5, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow
for deviations from the parking lot landscaping provisions, and a request for a variance from
Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 14-1-5, Variances, Vail
Town Code, to allow for deviations from the retaining wall height limits, located at 530, 540, and
580 South Frontage Road East (Ford Park)/ Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC120024)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Approved with Condition(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 6-0-0
CONDITIONS:
1. This variance approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail
approval of the associated design review applications.
This item was reviewed concurrently with item #2.
60 minutes
2. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-16-
10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various
improvements at Ford Park (realignment of athletic fields, new restroom and concession
buildings, new covered outdoor terrace, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater renovations, park
entrance improvements, Betty Ford Alpine Garden welcome center, streetscape improvements,
etc.) located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East/ Unplatted, and setting forth details
in regard thereto. (PEC120003)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Approved with Condition(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 4-2-0 (Pratt & Rediker opposed)
CONDITIONS:
1. This conditional use permit approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town
of Vail approval of the associated design review applications.
Page 1
Bill Gibson made a presentation per the Staff memorandum. He clarified that the applicant does
not need a landscape variance for the parking lot.
Todd Oppenheimer made a presentation to provide an overview of the project, an update on
discussions with CDOT concerning a relocated helipad, and an update on the changes made
since the last hearing.
Tom Braun, the applicant's representative, described in detail the changes made to Betty Ford
Way, the west restroom building, and the amphitheater.
Commissioner Pierce asked about the impacts of the helipad on 1-70.
Todd Oppenheimer stated the frontage road would have stopped traffic for a few moments, but
interstate traffic would not be impacted.
Tom Braun discussed the delivery truck access goals.
Kurt Freisen described in detail the alignment of Betty Ford Way, the proposed guardrail design,
retaining wall designs and reasoning for the
Pedro Campos discussed the overall architectural approach to the buildings, including the
restroom, concession and storage buildings. He detailed live roofs, the amphitheater garden
overlook, amphitheater main entry and amphitheater lawn seating.
Tom Braun summarized the development review process and review criteria.
Commissioner Kurz did not have questions, but is not sure about the plants on the roof.
Commissioner Rediker asked who owns the amphitheater and how the money was allocated.
Bill Gibson clarified that the Town of Vail owns the land and the Vail Valley Foundation, Vail
Recreation District and Betty Ford Alpine Gardens were lease holders at Ford Park. He noted
that the Town Council make financial decisions about the park on behalf of the Town. Pedro
Campos further clarified that the amphitheater buildings are owned by the Vail Valley
Foundation.
Commissioner Rediker asked about drainage and storm water run-off along East Betty Ford
Way.
Kurt Freisen responded with details about the drainage plan.
Commissioner Rediker asked about grease from trucks dropping down Betty Ford Way and
further into the creek.
Tom Braun noted that mechanical filters will be installed to prevent pollution from the parking lot
run-off.
Commission Bird asked how they will keep people off of the roof of the storage/restroom building
which has a lowest roof point of 4'-6". Pedro Campos stated the area will be heavily landscaped
with thorny plants and will have a swale to prevent people from accessing the roof.
Commissioner Bird then asked what kind of special events could occur in front of the
storage/restroom building.
Page 2
Todd Oppenheimer stated that the area in front of the storage building will need to be an
improved surface for access, regardless of any stages or special events in this location. He
noted that based upon recent discussion with the Special Event Coordinator and Highline
Entertainment, this will not be a location for winter concerts due to impacts to the athletic fields
and safety concerns that the snow on the fields could be compacted into ice during a concert
event.
Commissioner Bird asked about the removal of the presidential pavers with dedication names
that people donate a lot of money.
Pedro Campos responded that the pavers will be reused
Commissioner Pratt asked how fertilizer or dirt is delivered to the alpine garden. Kurt Freisen
stated that the truck will stay near the west entrance and the apron has enough space for a truck
turnaround. Commissioner Pratt stated the west entrance is a great improvement. He said a
simple railing is not appropriate. The heli -pad location presents an opportunity to merge some
uses. He stated that closing the east gate entrance is a loss for the amphitheater and location
will be very crowded. He said the old shacks at the park are just being replaced with new
shacks.
Commissioner Cartin asked about installing removable bollards to require smaller delivery trucks
to stay on the east side of the park. Kurt Freisen stated that they will look into this.
Commissioner Cartin asked if there is a way to prevent two trucks from going to the loading dock
at once. Kurt Freisen explained the loading queue. Commissioner Cartin stated he is in favor of
the green roof and added his support for stormwater control and management. He said that this
is a good time to make sure the creek is being protected.
Todd Oppenheimer noted that a loading dock sign will likely be installed similar to Arrabelle and
the Front Door loading docks.
Commissioner Pierce asked why there is no green roof on all the proposed structures. Todd
Oppenheimer stated that they selected the storage/restroom building for its location and views.
The other structures have not been finalized and could include a green roof.
Commissioner Pierce asked if utility services would be upgraded at the same time as the
proposed construction. Todd Oppenheimer noted that utility upgrades are being discussed and
are planned to coordinate with the proposed construction.
Commissioner Pierce asked about seating on the amphitheater lawn and whether circulation
could be aligned with the posts. Pedro Campos stated the WF does not agree with that
suggestion due to poor circulation. He said most performances are not static so the view is not
always blocked behind the poles.
Commissioner Bird asked about increasing the berm in the back of the amphitheater. Pedro
Campos explained the infill of the berm, including the transplant of all existing trees after
construction.
Commissioner Pierce asked about procedures for motions.
Bill Gibson requested that the Commission make motions for the variance and conditional use
permit as outlined in the Staff memorandum.
Page 3
Upon dissent of the conditional use permit, Commissioner Pratt stated he opposed due to the
mountain contemporary architectural style of the proposed buildings. He added that there are too
many new buildings that have spread out the park uses too much, but otherwise he supports the
project.
Commissioner Rediker recognized that a lot of work has gone into the proposal and he generally
supports the project. However, he is concerned about the drainage issues and wants to let the
Town Council know that the run-off from the expanded parking lot and Betty Ford Way must be
addressed prior to construction.
There was no public comment.
45 minutes
3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-3-7,
Amendment, Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulations amendments to Title 12, Zoning
Regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, to require restoration of
watercourses and riparian areas, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120011)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Tabled to June 11, 2012
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-0
Rachel Dimond made a presentation per the Staff memorandum.
There was no public comment.
Commissioner Kurz asked about the status of the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District.
Rachel noted that it is still in process, and other groups are also doing plans.
Commissioner Kurz recommended continuing the one at a time approach and waiting for the
studies being completed prior to adopting public policy and statutory regulations. He asked if
there is authority to address these issues today.
Rachel Dimond indicated that the Town has authority only on public property as trespassing
Commissioner Kurz asked what is currently enforceable and what information is needed to adopt
regulations.
Commissioner Cartin noted that many small steps are needed. We can do unlimited study or
can start making positive impact without overstepping our bounds. He noted concern about
point sources and spraying that go directly into the creek. He recommended adding studies to
justify the proposed amendments in the memos. He is curious what regulations the State of
Colorado will be imposing since they will supersede the Town regulations. He understands the
goal of reclaiming creek areas, but is concerned that the Town and Town leasees are not doing
best practices. The protection of the creek need to be comprehensive. Examples are more
paving in the villages and spraying for beetles in the Forest Service Lands.
Commissioner Rediker agreed that another presentation would be helpful. He recommended
looking at a variety of tools including taking back Town land and considering strengthening
setbacks (including the golf course) and requiring re -vegetation. If you own within x feet of Gore
Creek you can only use certain fertilizers. Point sources are easy to address, but non -point
Page 4
source is difficult. New regulations will be un -popular. Gore Creek is no longer a gold medal
fishery and there are no fish in Gore Creek
Commissioner Kurz asked how spraying is regulated: by whom, what is sprayed, is it done
properly, etc.
Commission Cartin described the EPA regulation of spraying.
Commissioner Bird noted that many chemicals are available to homeowners and many spray
their own trees.
Commissioner Cartin noted that it's a tricky balance for the Town to recommend what to spray to
individual property owners. He recommended balancing limited direct access to the creek while
still minimizing impacts to the creek.
Commissioner Rediker recommended incentivizing stream tract improvements with tax breaks or
other similar methods, rather than only penalizing negative behaviors.
Commissioner Cartin recommended giving priority to river birches with free tree give away.
Commissioner Pratt, owning property on the creek, does not support increasing setbacks. The
Town isn't using best practices today. TOV doesn't required grease and oil traps and should
install them at Ford Park. The TOV should cleanup its own act first. Education is critical. He
noted pictures of the large lawn washed away in East Vail as an example. On the east coast, the
state will plant forests on private land. The Town should provide more options to replace
willows. Property lines are in the creek in some areas, so people should have property rights to
do what they wish. Commissioner Pratt stated he likes ideas of 20-30 buffer along creek instead
of measuring the setback from the centerline of the creek. He added that he believes golf course
and CDOT run-off are more impactful.
Commissioner Rediker asked about impacts from the golf course.
Commissioner Cartin noted that golf course have changes significantly in recent years and for
fiscal reasons minimize their usage of chemical.
Commissioner Rediker finds it ironic that the State may be imposing water quality rules, yet
CDOT is dumping tons of mag -chloride on the interstate.
Commissioner Pratt reiterated the need to educate about alternatives to willows and the need for
bank stabilization in particular along the golf course.
Commissioner Cartin commented that channelization projects are needed along the creek.
Rachel Dimond summarized the Commissioners' comments and asked for additional comment
about the first two concepts in the Staff memo.
Commissioner Bird noted her support for requiring revegetation at the time of redevelopment
applications.
Commissioner Rediker asked about property ownership along Gore Creek
Page 5
Rachel Dimond explained the current ownership patterns and the impacts on riparian areas.
She also described the current setback regulations and asked for comment on the existing
regulations.
Commissioner Kurz in general supported larger setbacks. He recommended an environmental
analysis.
Commissioner Pratt agreed. He used the example of a glycol risk from a heated sidewalk versus
a gravel path. He did not support retroactive punishment. He supports more public educations
and again noted the erosion along Aspen Lane as examples to help with public education.
Commissioner Cartin recommend understanding what the Town can and can't affect. He again
noted that the broader issues must be considered such as spraying, run-off, etc. He noted that
eliminating mag -chloride is a more challenging issue. TOV can be a leader. Stephens Park, golf
course, etc. could be examples of best management practices. He agrees with Kurz that studies
are needed to help address the real issues.
Commissioner Kurz asked for additional information about the tributaries and their health. He
asked for another briefing from ERWSD. He's concerned that setbacks may not be addressing
the real issue.
Commissioner Rediker reiterated concerns about CDOT impacts. He asked if chemical analysis
can be done in addition to only bug counts.
Commissioner Pierce emphasized the need for public education. A newspaper isn't adequate.
Doing a sample project at the golf course creates a real story, with a visible effect, that people
will better understand and will support. He's concerned about increasing setbacks. He prefers
the suggestion of measuring from the high water mark. He asked if the public could purchase,
obtain conservation easements, etc. to help protect what is currently private property. He noted
the need for the Town to lead by example.
Commissioner Cartin noted that Stephens Park is a good example of a successful project that
protected the creek, but maintained some public access. He believes studies and thought is
needed if setbacks are changed.
Commissioner Kurz cautioned about public relations. The public needs to understand the creek
is a resource and an important asset to the community.
There was no public comment.
4. A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional
Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a public building and grounds, to allow for the
redevelopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and
office building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South Frontage Road West/
Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012)
Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and Town of Vail, represented
by Consilium Partners, Vail
Planner: Warren Campbell/ Bill Gibson
ACTION: Tabled to June 11, 2012
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-0
Page 6
5. Approval of May 14, 2012 minutes
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-0
6. Information Update
7. Adjournment
MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6-0-0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road West. The public is invited to attend the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town
of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published May 18, 2012, in the Vail Daily.
Page 7
Ad Name: 7996495A
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM
Your account number is- 1 OP2P33
MW nay
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO }
}ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified
representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper
printed, in whole or in part and published in the County
of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation
therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first
publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and
that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice
and advertisement as requested.
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every
number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1
consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 6/8/2012 and
that the last publication of said notice was dated 6/8/2012 in
the issue of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
06/18/2012.
General Man ager/Publisher/Editor
Vail Daily
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 06/18/2012.
2mg-&
9. -V-�
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public
My Commission expires: November 1, 2015
�pRY PUe/
' PAMELA J.
SCHULTZ
9�� COt-SRP$
My Commismn Expires 11/0112015
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and
Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will
hold a public hearing in accordance with section
12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on June 25, 2012, at 1:00
pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
There have been no new applications submitted to
be heard at this hearing. There will be a public
hearing on June 25, 2012 to consider items which
have been continued from the previous public
hearing.
The applications and information about the propos-
als are available for public inspection during office
hours at the Town of Vail Community Develop-
ment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend site visits. Please call
970-479-2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon re-
quest, with 24-hour notification. Please call
970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im-
paired, for information.
Published June 8, 2012, in the Vail Daily.
(7996495)
Ad Name: 8053966A PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM Ju1e00pm012
Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33 TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
/ PUBLIC WELCOME
Vail Daily 75 S. Frontage Road W. -Vail, Colorado 81657
**Order and times of agenda items
are subject to change**
PROOF OF PUBLICATION 1.A request for the review of conditional useupteer-
mits, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Us-
es, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a
public building and grounds, to allow for the rede-
STATE OF COLORADO } velopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a
medical research, rehabilitation, and office building
l SS and a municipal office building located at 75 and
I 111 South Frontage Road West/ Unplatted, and
} setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012)
COUNTY OF EAGLE
Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Tri-
umph Development and Town of Vail, represented
by Consilium Partners, Vail
Planner: Warren Campbell
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper 45 minutes
2.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
printed, In whole or In part and published In the County Council for a prescribed regulations amendment,
pursuant to 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code,
of Ea le, State of Colorado, and has a eneral circulation to allow for amendments to Title zoning
g g lations, to amend the developmentt r review process,
and setting forth details in regard thereto.
therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously (PEC120010)
Applicant: Town of Vail
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION:
more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Ppublication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and 3.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
g Council, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment,
that said news a has ublished the re uested le al notice Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulations
er
p p 1� q g amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and
Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code,
and advertisement as requested. to require restoration of watercourses and riparian
areas, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC120011)
Applicant: Town of Vail
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium, Planner: Rachel Dimond
ACTION: Table to July 9, 2012
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Rule rOVlSlon. 4.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
1� Council for a zone district boundary amendment,
pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town
Code, to allow for a rezoning of the Vail National
Bank Building (US Bank Building) from Special De -
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was velopment District No. 23 with an underlying zon-
ing of Commercial Service Center District to the
published in the regular and entire issue of every General Use District, located at 108 South Front-
age Road West/Lot D2, Vail Village Filing 2, and
number of said dailynewspaper for the period of 1 setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120014)
1� Applicant: Vail Clinic Inc., represented by Rick
consecutive insertions; and that the first ublication of said PylPlanner:
and Jim Wear
P nner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Table to July 9, 2012
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 6/22/2012 and MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
that the last publication of said notice was dated 6/22/2012 in 5.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council on prescribed regulation amendments to
the issue of said newspaper. Section 12-13-5, Employee Housing Unit Deed Re-
striction Exchange Program, Vail Town Code, pur-
suant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town
Code, to allow for amendments to the employee
In witness whereof, I have here unto set m hand this da housing unit deed restriction exchange program re -
Y Y, view process, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC120017)
07/06/2012• Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to August 13, 2012
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
6.Approval of May 21, 2012 minutes
§VZ= MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
General Man ager/Publisher/Editor 7.Information Update
Vail Daily MOTION SECOND: VOTE:
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for The applications and information about the propos-
als are available for public inspection during regular
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 07/06/2012. office hours at the Town of Vail Community Devel-
opment Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and
�^{ the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon re-
quest with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for
information.
My Commission expires. November 1, 20155 Community Development Department
Published June 22, 2012, in the Vail Daily.
(8053966)
�pRY PUe/
' PAMELA J.
SCHULTZ
9�� COt-SRP$
My Commismn Expires 1llOIQC15