HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-1028 PECTOWN OF VAft� PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
October 28, 2013 at 1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visit:
1. Betty Ford Alpine Gardens — 530 S. Frontage Road
45 minutes
1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed regulations
amendment, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to amend Section 11- 17 -12,
Vehicular Signs, Vail Town Code, to clarify ambiguous language, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC130026)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jonathan Spence
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
90 minutes
2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the 2013 Gerald R.
Ford Park Master Plan, an assemblage of the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan, the 1997 Ford Park
Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment, located at 530, 540,
and 580 South Frontage Road East /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC130012)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
60 minutes
3. A request for a worksession to present the conceptual plans for review of the proposed Betty
Ford Alpine Garden Education Center, located at 530 South Frontage Road East /Unplatted, and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation, represented by Zehren & Associates, Inc.
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
4. A request for the review of a variance from Section 12- 14 -17, Setback from Watercourse, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction
of gross residential floor area within the prescribed setback, located at 1975 Placid Drive Unit
33 /1-ot 33, Vail Village West Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto (PEC130025).
Applicant: Rosslyn May Valentine Residence Trust, represented by Richard Bolduc
Planner: Joe Batcheller
ACTION: Table to November 25, 2013
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
Page 1
5 minutes
5. Approval of September 23, 2013 and October 14, 2013 minutes
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
6. Information Update
7. Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning
and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please
call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published October 25, 2013 in the Vail Daily.
Page 2
TOWN OF VAIt f PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
October 28, 2013 at 1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Bill Pierce
Henry Pratt
Luke Cartin
Pam Hopkins
Susan Bird
John Rediker
Michael Kurz
Site Visit:
1. Betty Ford Alpine Gardens — 530 S. Frontage Road
45 minutes
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed regulations
amendment, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to amend Section 11- 17 -12,
Vehicular Signs, Vail Town Code, to clarify ambiguous language, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC130026)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jonathan Spence
ACTION: Tabled to November 25, 213
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 7 -0 -0
Jonathan Spence gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. He asked if the Commission
understood and agreed with the problem statement.
Commissioner Kurz stated that signs have a business development component, which were not
worthy of discussion with this review. Where and when it should be discussed is debatable. Is it
really within the purview of the Planning Department to review this? How long should [the vehicle
sign] sit? It's a problem how the TOV is approaching this. We're on shaky ground.
Commissioner Peirce stated he agreement with the problem statement
Jonathan Spence spoke to the goals and objectives and asked the Commissioner for feedback
and general agreement on these goals and objectives. Spence clarified that the efforts to revise
the language is at the direction of the Town Council.
Commissioner Bird stated that defining what a sign "is ", is imperative.
Commissioner Kurz stated his concern with the vagueness of a term such as "aesthetically
harmonious" and needs clarification.
Jonathan Spence stated the "aesthetically harmonious" is part of the guidelines and so it is
acceptable for it to have a degree of subjectivity.
George Ruther interjected that what the Commission is considering is a way to make vehicular
signs legal, because as it is now such signs are not. New restrictions are not being proposed.
Page 1
Jonathan Spence explained that some of the proposal laid outside of the parameters that
George alluded to.
The Commissioner Peirce opened up the discussion. Commission members by in large were
against a design review aspect of vehicular signs.
Commissioner Pratt suggest that this could be simplified by prohibiting vehicular signs.
Commissioner Cartin asked about vehicular signs associated with special events?
Jonathan Spence stated that it is to only be associated with brick and mortar businesses.
Commissioner Hopkins asked if vehicular signs could be brought up during the business license
process?
Commissioner Kurz suggested that perhaps it needs to codified dependent on the function of the
business.
Jonathan Spence made the point that it needs to be standardized.
Commissioner Peirce suggested that the vehicles need to be moved daily
Commissioner Pratt pointed out potential loopholes for that. What if it is only the size of vehicular
signage that is regulated? It would simplify enforcement.
Commissioner Peirce opened the discussion up to the public.
Brian Bevan, legal counsel for Alpine Liquor would like more time to analyze staff's
recommendations and is asking for a motion to table. Mr. Bevan explained the background of the
delivery truck and the business. Mr. Bevan asserted the vehicular sign is incompliance with the
sign code and the context of West Vail. He stated the problem statement is inaccurate to the
situation, and went on to point potential loopholes with staff's recommendations (locations,
orientation, etc.). Mr. Bevan's primary critique was that many of the metrics for enforcement are
subjective and could lead to arbitrary application of the proposed code amendment. A letter from
Stovall Associates outlining the concerns, dated October 28, 2013, was made part of the record.
Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowners Association spoke to the sense of community and that we all
realize that Vail is a special place. We're trying to portray a cityscape that is not like everywhere
else. The Alpine Liquor vehicular sign is offensive and does not belong in Vail.
90 minutes
2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the 2013 Gerald R.
Ford Park Master Plan, an assemblage of the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan, the 1997 Ford Park
Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment, located at 530, 540,
and 580 South Frontage Road East /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC130012)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION: Recommendation of approval with modification(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 7 -0 -0
MODIFICATION(S):
1. Add a paragraph regarding the shorter term planning perspective of this effort yet
acknowledge that more thought and consideration should go into future effort and
Page 2
conversation about Ford Park. Special consideration should be given to the possible
uses on the surface parking lot.
2. Amend "shall not exceed" to "approximately" 3,000 square feet
3. Encourage a multiple use facility at the tennis center site for a visitor center,
education center, etc.
4. Allow a wetlands /conservation education garden to the constructed within the Gore
Creek Corridor
5. Provide directional signage for traffic control on Betty Ford Way
6. Add a Policy statement regarding ADA accessibility to Goal #4
7. Add language about the importance and use of the bus turn around on Vail Valley
Drive for traffic control during pass closures
8. Page 25 Restrooms at the Nature Center
9. Page 22 New Policy #4 regarding limited use of pesticides and herbicides and
standards for ecological BMP's
10. Page 42 add "and the uses existing or contemplated in the Park"
George Ruther gave an introduction to the presentation that was scheduled, which recapped the
review process thus far. He concluded by discussing the location proposed for the Betty Ford
Alpine Garden education center, which included eight different sites. The preferred location by
the applicant is along West Betty Ford Way, which is identified in the proposed Maser Plan
language. A final recommendation of approval was requested by the applicant. Since the last
public hearing with the Commission approximately 18 individuals and groups were provided the
draft document for comment.
Tom Braun gave a power point presentation which began with an overview of the three primary
objectives of the document before the Commission for a recommendation. He went through
each of the six goals contained within the plan and what was being said by each. He spoke to
how some elements are greyer and will need interpretation and some are clear and defined.
Flexibility and certainty is built into the plan.
Commissioner Rediker spoke to Goal 1, Policy Statement 2 should be bolstered to be stronger
and prohibitive of using things like pesticides, etc.
Commissioner Hopkins stated that a statement regarding the maintenance of the ecology of the
park be included.
George Ruther and Tom Braun suggested that a more appropriate way to include the statement
by Commissioners Rediker and Hopkins would be to include an additional policy statement.
Commissioner Pratt inquired as to the status of the parking provided for the park and the location
of a significant number of parking spaces in the CDOT right -of -way.
George Ruther spoke to the use agreement in place with CDOT and the parameters by which
the parking might be removed. He added that it was unlikely, with current knowledge, that the
parking will be lost.
Commissioner Bird asked a question regarding the architectural compatibility statement.
George Ruther spoke to the statement and its intent to strengthen the need to develop an
architectural language for the park.
Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowners Association, asked a question regarding access by vehicles to
the park.
Page 3
George Ruther highlighted how Goal 3 addressed vehicular access.
Commissioner Pierce asked staff to speak to the comments of the AIPP Board.
George Ruther and Tom Braun responded to the comments regarding temporary art installations
and the restoration of the Art Shack.
Commissioner Pierce asked what the chances that the public restrooms for the playground could
be incorporated into the Betty Ford Alpine Garden Education Center and serve a dual purpose.
Commissioner Cartin spoke to the need to include a statement about the benefits to the
elimination of a restroom building by incorporated into a new Betty Ford Alpine Garden
Education Center.
Commissioner Cartin spoke to Goal 6 and some confusion around the financial responsibilities
and the wording contained within the draft plan. He suggested a statement be added about how
the Vail Town Council will make policy decisions regarding funding of improvements by lease
holders.
Commissioner Rediker spoke to a comment he had regarding Future Improvements on the
Active Recreation Sub -area (page 42). He suggested "use" be added. On page 60 of the
document under Improvement #8, Betty Ford Way, he spoke to the need to include a statement
regarding the use of environmentally sensitive paving materials.
Commissioner Cartin suggested that the use of un- environmentally sensitive materials should
apply Town wide, border to border.
Jim Lamont, added to Commissioner Rediker's statement, regarding the need to have a broader
statement in the Master Plan regarding a need to be more environmentally minded with regard to
storm water run -off and use of chemicals from the fields, parking lots, gardens, etc. He asked
someone to tell him what it is AIPP wants through this document. Not that he is opposed, but
without forethought options and synergy may be missed. A nickel and dime approach is not
appropriate. He stated that there still needs to be a section in the Master Plan speaking to the
long term plan for the upper bench and the soccer field parking lot on Vail Valley Drive. There
should be a list of potential uses which is not inclusive and exclusive, but speak to the potential
need to put structures on top of a subterranean parking structure. He gave examples such as an
aquatic therapy center, indoor performing arts facility, a history museum, art museum, retractable
rain covering over the amphitheater.
Commissioner Kurz stated that an epilogue may be appropriate to speak to the limited view of
the document and the need to evaluate other proposals in the future under conditions and needs
at the time.
Nicola Ripley, Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, asked the Commission if there was concern about the
document containing a size limitation on the structure.
George Ruther, spoke to the Town Council's request to include the limitation, however, the
Commission can make a recommendation they feel is appropriate.
Commissioner Pierce spoke to the Commission's previous agreement that the Master Plan
should not include a size limitation.
Page 4
The Commission spoke about the size limitation and the need to eliminate a definite maximum
size, but an approximation of the appropriate size, which would be reviewed in conjunction with
the conditional use permit for the structure when that time comes.
Gwen Scalpello, resident, volunteer with the Betty Ford Alpine Garden, spoke to the possiblility
of a wetlands garden in the riparian area as a positive possibility. She then spoke to Goal 3,
Policy 3 , which speaks to Betty Ford Way use for loading and delivery. She applauded the
policy, but the result has been that Betty Ford way has become one -way for loading and delivery,
verses allowing for some vehicular turn - around to return up West Betty Ford Way. She spoke to
ADA accessible pathways through the park.
Commissioner Pratt stated that he was in agreement the proposed amendments discussed
throughout the hearing, however, he cannot support the codification of a site for the Betty Ford
Alpine Garden Education Center on West Betty Ford Way, when he believes the better Master
Plan location is on the tennis court site.
Commissioner Piece summarized that the Commission is in agreement that the best location for
the Education Center is through a redevelopment of the tennis court site building. Should the
plan state that the preferred location is the tennis court site and that an acceptable secondary
location is along West Betty Ford Way.
60 minutes
3. A request for a worksession to present the conceptual plans for review of the proposed Betty
Ford Alpine Garden Education Center, located at 530 South Frontage Road East /Unplatted, and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation, represented by Zehren & Associates, Inc.
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION: Conceptual, no vote
George Ruther gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.
Pedro Campos, Zehren and Associates, representing the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens,
Commissioner Pierce asked to know the physical distance from the Village Parking Structure
and the east Ford Park parking location to the proposed Education Center. Where will people
park? How many people will need to park? How will they get to the facility?
Commissioner Bird asked where buses would drop off groups to visit the Education Center
facility and how would the visitors make their way to the facility.
Pedro Campos spoke to loading and delivery operations of the gardens and the use of smaller
golf carts to move materials around the site.
Commissioner Pierce asked about the loading and delivery needs anticipated by the Education
Center facility.
Commissioner Cartin inquired as to the intended use of the facility. Could someone rent the
facility for an event? What are the hours of the use of the facility?
Commissioner Pierce inquired as to greater detail on the education programs that may occur.
Children, adults, both? How many people would be attending and where would they park?
Commissioner Cartin pointed out the proposed floor plan shows a kitchen for staff or catering.
What it the catering anticipated for? What groups /programs? ADA access is important and how
Page 5
will it be achieved? It would be great to have the public restrooms for the playground area
incorporated into tis new structure.
Commissioner Pierce inquired if the facility was intended to be used year round.
Commissioner Bird asked about addressing the safety concerns.
George Ruther stated that it would be the VRD and the Betty Ford Alpine Garden will need to
speak with each other outside a public hearing.
Commissioner Pierce inquired about emergency vehicle access to the park in a year round
scenario.
Commissioner Cartin spoke to a preference that employee mitigation not occur on site
The Commission agreed that allowing for the mitigation to occur off -site or via a fee -in -lieu
option.
Commissioner Pratt expand that he will be interested in knowing how people with mobility
challenges will get from where they park to the Education Center. A plan to address this should
not violate the Master Plan which is attempting to reduce traffic in the park. How will Fed Ex and
UPS delivery packages?
Commissioner Pierce stated the Commission's goal of making this a successful facility and the
answers to these questions need to be figured out.
Commissioner Hopkins asked if the walking paths would be plowed?
Commissioner Kurz inquired as to the amount of outdoor space in front of the building and on the
roof -top at the back of the building. Should these areas be separated? Would an event want on
the space consolidated?
Commissioner Bird inquired as to who will be able to be rent the facility? Public? Private? Is
there a fee?
The applicant stated they would return with responses to these questions.
4. A request for the review of a variance from Section 12- 14 -17, Setback from Watercourse, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction
of gross residential floor area within the prescribed setback, located at 1975 Placid Drive Unit
33 /Lot 33, Vail Village West Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto (PEC130025).
Applicant: Rosslyn May Valentine Residence Trust, represented by Richard Bolduc
Planner: Joe Batcheller
ACTION: Table to November 25, 2013
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 7 -0 -0
5 minutes
5. Approval of September 23, 2013 and October 14, 2013 minutes
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 7 -0 -0
6. Information Update
Commissioner Cartin inquired about the timing of the Timber Ridge redevelopment coming
before the Commission.
Page 6
George Ruther stated that he anticipated that occurring on December 23rd
A discussion followed regarding who would be in attendance on the 23rd of December. Several
members stated that they would be unavailable. It was discussed that the hearing possibly be
rescheduled to December 161H
7. Adjournment
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Bird VOTE: 7 -0 -0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning
and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please
call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published October 25, 2013 in the Vail Daily.
Page 7
TOWN OF VAIL �
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: October 28, 2013
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed
regulations amendment, pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to
amend Section 11- 17 -12, Vehicular Signs, Vail Town Code, to clarify ambiguous
language, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130026)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jonathan Spence
SUMMARY
The applicant, the Town of Vail, is requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to amend Section
11- 17 -12, Vehicular Signs, Vail Town Code, to clarify ambiguous language, and setting
forth details in regard thereto.
Staff initiated this application at the direction of the Vail Town Council as a result of an
identified need to address the ambiguous and vague language that has proven to be
difficult for business owners to understand and problematic for enforcement, if not
unenforceable. As a result, Staff is proposing amendments to the existing Vehicular
Sign regulation to clarify under what circumstances these signs may be permissible in
the Town of Vail.
Based on the criteria and findings in Section IV of this memorandum, and the testimony
presented at the public hearing, Staff recommends the Planning and Environmental
Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for this
application.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The following problem statement, goal, objectives and council direction provide a
summary of the issues that are being addressed with the proposed regulations
amendments:
Problem Statement
To increase visibility and name recognition, business owners have chosen to place
signage on vehicles that are used as components of the business operation. Some of
these vehicles and accompanying signs are being used to aid in the identification of the
business location through the size of the vehicle and the location of the parked vehicle.
A conflict between these signs and the Town of Vail sign policy exists related to their
dominance of the landscape, incompatibility with their surroundings, visual clutter and
lack of aesthetic compatibility with the mountain landscape. The existing code language
is ineffective at providing a regulatory framework that clearly conveys what is
permissible and that allows consistent, fair enforcement.
Goal
To have code language that clearly conveys to the business community the parameters
of permissible vehicular signage and that allows for the fair and consistent enforcement
of these signs in the Town of Vail.
Objectives
• Clearly define the term "Vehicular Sign"
• Clearly establish the standards for vehicular signs as defined.
• Use language that is unambiguous.
• Create a regulation that allows for fair, consistent and practical enforcement.
Council Direction
On August 6, 2013 the Vail Town Council directed staff to engage the Planning and
Environment Commission and the community on alternative language related to
vehicular signs that clearly established permissible signage and allowed for effective
enforcement.
As identified in Section 11 -5 -2 and Section 11 -5 -3 of the Vail Code, it is the policy of
the Town of Vail that signs shall not create visual clutter, should be aesthetically
harmonious with the mountain setting, should be surrounded by landscaping when
appropriate and shall be visually compatible with the size of surrounding structures and
other signage. Vehicle signs located on large vans or panel style trucks have the
potential to be in conflict with this policy.
It should be noted that it is not the vehicles moving within our community or on the
adjacent interstate that causes this concern but rather the parking of these vehicles in
locations visible from public spaces and adjacent roadways. When these vehicles are
parked, their function changes from the legitimate role of the delivery of goods and
services or other activities related to the business operation to that of a stationary sign.
Town of Vail Page 2
It is these stationary signs that may be in conflict with the Town of Vail sign policy in
their dominance of the landscape, incompatibility with their surroundings, visual clutter
and lack of aesthetic compatibility with the mountain landscape.
Staff supports maintaining the placement of vehicular signs in Section 11 -7 Other Signs,
Vail Town Code requiring a permit and associated review. Section 11- 7,Other Signs,
Vail Town Code, is proposed to be amended in part as follows (text to be deleted is in
o+riLo+hrp_ g text that is to be added is bold, and sections of text that are not amended
have been omitted):
Sec. 11 -7 -12: Vehicular Signs
A. Description: Any vehicle used for service or delivery displaying a sign,
as defined in Section 11 -2 -1, Vail Town Code, that is to be located on the
business property.
Use: The vehicle shall be used for business activities of the
associated business.
2. Location: The location of the vehicle shall be clearly shown on a site
plan for the property upon which the business is located, submitted
with the sign permit application and shall meet the following
requirements:
a. The vehicle shall be parked within an enclosed structure, if
available.
b. The location of vehicle shall minimize, to the greatest extent
feasible, its visibility from public spaces and adjacent roadways.
c. The vehicle shall be parked in a manner consistent with other
vehicles and not in difference to the pre- determined parking area
design and circulation and shall be consistent with Sec. 14 -5 -1,
Minimum Standards, Vail Town Code.
d. The location of the vehicle shall not impede the viewing of
other business frontages or their associated signage.
e. If deemed necessary by the administrator, the location of the
vehicle will be clearly signed to indicate that the use of the area is
Town of Vail Page 3
for the exclusive use of the vehicle. This sign shall not exceed
two (2) square feet in size and shall be composed of natural
colors according to Section 11 -5 -2D of this title.
3. Design: Subject to design review.
4. Landscaping: Additional landscaping shall be provided to assist in
the screening of the vehicle from public spaces and adjacent roadways,
when deemed necessary by the administrator.
5. Vehicle Condition: The vehicle shall be fully licensed and operable.
6. Special Provisions: Vehicles unable to meet the requirements of this
section shall not be permitted to be parked on the business property.
III. BACKGROUND
Ordinance No.19, Series of 2003, approved by Town Council on November 4, 2003,
replaced Title 11, Sign Regulations with a new Sign Code. The new sign code was
developed collaboratively between the Community Development Department, business
owners, signage professionals, and the Planning and Environmental Commission. The
new sign code was intended to support the Town's vision of being the Premier Resort
Community while making the code easier to understand, implement and enforce.
Prior to the new sign code, the language related to vehicle signs was located in Sec. 16-
24. Exempted Signs and read:
Signs displayed on trucks, buses, trailers or other vehicles which are being
operated or stored in the normal course of a business, indicating the name of the
owner, business and location, which are applied to moving vans, delivery trucks,
rental trucks and trailers and the like, provided, that the primary purpose of the
vehicles is not for the display of signs, and provided that they are parked or
stored in areas appropriate to their use as vehicles.
The new sign code revised the language of Vehicle Sign and relocated it to Sec. 11 -7.
Other Signs. This language reads:
Sec. 11 -7 -12: Vehicular Signs
Any vehicles displaying the name of the business associated with said vehicle
shall be used on a regular basis for service and delivery or other vehicular needs
related to that business activity. Vehicular signs shall not be used for the sole
purpose of advertising a business, as determined by the administrator
The new language was effective in removing content based references but does not
clearly convey what is permissible. Ambiguous and vague phrases including "on a
regular basis ", "other vehicle needs" and "sole purpose of advertising ", for example, can
Town of Vail Page 4
be difficult for business owners to understand and have proven to be problematic for
enforcement, if not unenforceable.
Currently, problems associated with the use of vehicle signs are generally confined
within the West Vail commercial area although similar problems could arise in the
commercial plazas of East Vail. Because of topography, site layout, highway and road
frontage, and other differences, it is not anticipated that this type of signage will become
problematic within the Vail Village or Lionshead commercial areas.
Although required by the Vail Town Code to acquire a permit, no vehicular signs are
currently permitted. With the adoption of revised language, a component of community
outreach will be requiring businesses that currently utilize vehicular signs to obtain sign
permits.
IV. REVIEW CRITERIA
The extent to which the text amendment furthers the general and specific
purposes of the zoning regulations; and
Staff believes the proposed amendment furthers the general purpose of the sign
regulations by:
"...promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town, and to
promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner
that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established
character as a resort and residential community of high quality."
Staff believes the proposed amendment furthers the following specific purposes
of the sign regulations:
1. To describe and enable the fair and consistent enforcement of signs in
the town of Vail.
2. To encourage the establishment of well designed, creative signs that
enhance the unique character of Vail's village atmosphere.
3. To preserve a successful and high quality business environment that is
aided by signs that identify, direct, and inform.
4. To aid in providing for the growth of an orderly, safe, beautiful, and
viable community.
The proposed amendments to the regulations will require vehicular signs that
assist in preserving the high quality business environment which can be reviewed
and enforced fairly and consistently. Staff believes that this proposal complies
with this criterion.
Town of Vail Page 5
2. The extent to which the text amendment would better implement and better
achieve the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives, and
policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the
development objectives of the town; and
Many communities struggle with finding the proper balance with language to
permit appropriate signage for vehicles that are involved in the daily operation of
the advertised business while prohibiting vehicle signs whose apparent purpose
is to advertise a business service or product located on the same or nearby
property to where the vehicle is parked. Some communities attempt to achieve
the distinction through their definition of prohibited signs while others through
permissible signage. These distinctions are often attempted by identifying the
purpose or activity of the vehicle. These can include the location, manner and
duration in which a vehicle is parked and also the primary or apparent purpose of
the vehicle. Staff has researched other communities including the Town of
Aspen, City of Steamboat Springs, Town of Snowmass Village, City of Boulder,
Placer County, CA, Town of Truckee, CA the City of Santa Barbara, CA. All of
these communities have attempted to regulate vehicle signs through either
restrictions on location, manner and duration for which the vehicle is parked, or
through an attempt to define the primary or apparent purpose of the vehicle that
the signage is affixed to.
Staff has had difficulties in enforcing the sign regulations pertaining to vehicle
signs because of the ambiguous nature of the existing language. Staff has been
challenged to explain how it is to be determined if a vehicle is being used solely
for the purpose of advertising and what constitutes use on a regular basis. The
existing language is one of the barriers to the fair and consistent enforcement of
vehicle signs in the Town of Vail.
Staff believes that the best way to address the issue of vehicle signage when a
vehicle is parked on private property is to borrow what has been most successful
from other communities contacted with the addition of a site planning component.
Staff supports the inclusion of a site planning standard for parked vehicles
related to the day to day operation of a particular tenant. This standard would
require the identification on a site plan of the location of the vehicles and require
this location to meet certain standards related to place, operation, and visibility.
The proposed revisions assist in the improved implementation and enforcement
of the sign regulations and in meeting the adopted goals, policies and policies of
the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes that this proposal complies with this
criterion.
3. The extent to which the text amendment demonstrates how conditions
have substantially changed since the adoption of the subject regulation
and how the existing regulation is no longer appropriate or is inapplicable;
and
Town of Vail Page 6
The proposed text amendment demonstrates the need to periodically update
regulations based not only on changing conditions but also on the effectiveness
of the regulation. The existing language has proved challenging from both a user
and code enforcement perspective. Staff believes this criterion to be met.
4. The extent to which the text amendment provides a harmonious,
convenient, workable relationship among land use regulations consistent
with municipal development objectives; and
The proposed text amendments will allow for a harmonious, convenient, and
workable relationship among land use regulations consistent with municipal
development objectives. The proposed text amendments will allow for balance to
be achieved between the goals of maintaining a high quality business
environment that is aided by signs that identify, direct, and inform while enabling
the fair and consistent enforcement of signs in the town of Vail.
5. Such other factors and criteria the planning and environmental
commission and /or council deem applicable to the proposed text
amendment.
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and
Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town
Council, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code to amend Section
11- 17 -12, Vehicular Signs, Vail Town Code, to clarify ambiguous language and setting
forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation is based upon the review of the
criteria outlined in Section V of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony
presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of approval for this request, the Community Development
Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation to
the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code,
to amend Section 11- 17 -12, Vehicular Signs, Vail Town Code, to clarify
ambiguous language, and setting forth details in regard thereto."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of approval for this request, the Community Development Department
recommends the Commission makes the following findings:
"Based upon a review of Section IV of this memorandum, and the evidence and
testimony presented the Planning and Environmental Commission finds.
Town of Vail Page 7
1) That the amendment is consistent with the applicable elements of the
adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive
plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town, and
2) That the amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the
zoning regulations, and
3) That the amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general
welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious
development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its
natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential
community of the highest quality."
Town of Vail Page 8
0
TOWN OF VAIL �
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: October 28, 2013
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption
of the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan, an assemblage of the 1985
Ford Park Master Plan, the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan, and the
2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment, located at 530, 540, and
580 South Frontage Road East /Unplatted, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC130012)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Braun, Braun Associates,
Inc.
Planner: George Ruther
DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant, the Town of Vail, is requesting a recommendation from the Town of Vail
Planning & Environmental Commission (the "PEC ") to the Vail Town Council (the "TC ")
on the adoption of the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master (the "Plan "), an assemblage of
the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan, the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan, and the 2012
Ford Park Management Plan Amendment, located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage
Road East /Unplatted.
Key elements of the new master plan include the following:
• Compilation of the previous planning documents
• Amended goals, objectives, policy statements and action steps
• Sub area plans with recommendations
• Expanded park boundary to the Covered Bridge
The goal of the master planning effort is to create a plan that maintains the essence of
what Gerald R. Ford Park (the "Park ") is today and what was envisioned for the Park in
1974 — a combination of natural open space along the Gore Creek corridor coupled with
recreational, social, and cultural uses and facilities that serve the needs of residents and
guests of Vail. The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan will provide the town and
community with a "guiding document' for the Park for the next ten years.
The primary purpose of the Plan is to define community expectations for the use of and
future improvements to the Park and as a resource to assist the Town in the decision-
making regarding capital improvements and /or any proposed changes to the Park. In
the end, the Plan is to be one of the many elements that comprise the Vail
Comprehensive Plan.
BACKGROUND
On April 16, 2013, the Vail Town Council instructed town staff to prepare a new master
plan for Gerald R. Ford Park. In doing so, the Town Council provided the following
direction:
The new plan shall be a compilation of the 1974 Vail Plan, 1985 Ford Park Master Plan,
1997 Ford Park Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Update.
A series of goals, objectives, policies and actions steps were to be developed to clarify
the community's expectations for the Park and guide future decisions about
improvements with the Park.
The concept of sub area planning within the Park was supported. While the Park was to
be planned in its entirety, sub area plans and illustrative graphics were to be used to
further clarify opportunities within the respective areas of the Park.
The new plan was to incorporate both current improvements already underway within
the Park but also capture and articulate future improvement opportunities.
The Plan was to have an approximate ten year life span with periodic updates and
amendment considerations when needed.
III. REVIEW CRITERIA
1. The extent to which the Master Plan furthers the general and specific purposes
of the zoning regulations; and
Based upon the evidence and testimony presented at multiple public hearings, Staff
believes the proposed Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan furthers the general purposes
of the zoning regulations. Staff believes the existing park, the proposed improvements
to Ford Park, and the associated updates to the Plan maintains the health, safety,
morals, and general welfare of the town and promote the coordinated and harmonious
development of the town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural
environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high
quality.
Staff further believes the proposed Master Plan furthers the specific purposes of the
zoning regulations. Staff finds the existing park, the proposed improvements to Ford
Park, and the associated updates to the Plan continues to:
• To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities.
Town of Vail Page 2
• To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow,
and other dangerous conditions.
• To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and
to lessen congestion in the streets.
• To promote adequate and appropriately located off street parking and loading
facilities.
• To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic
values.
• To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land
uses, consistent with municipal development objectives.
• To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with
structures.
• To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the town.
• To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other
desirable natural features.
• To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other
amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters.
• To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community.
Staff also believes the proposed Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan furthers the purposes
of the General Use District. Staff believes the existing park, the proposed
improvements to Ford Park, and the associated updates to the Master Plan continues to
provide sites for public and quasi - public uses which, because of their special
characteristics, cannot be appropriately regulated by the development standards
prescribed for other zoning districts, and for which development standards especially
prescribed for each particular development proposal or project are necessary to achieve
the purposes prescribed in section 12 -1 -2 of this title and to provide for the public
welfare.
Staff believes the existing park, the proposed improvements to Ford Park, and the
associated updates to the Master Plan continues to ensure that public buildings and
grounds and certain types of quasi - public uses permitted in the General Use District are
appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail,
are harmonized with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other
structures, ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to
the permitted types of uses.
2. The extent to which the master plan would better implement and better achieve
the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives, and policies outlined in
the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives
of the town; and
Based upon the evidence and testimony presented at multiple public hearings, Staff
believes the existing park, the proposed improvements to Ford Park, and the associated
updates to the Master Plan are consistent with the following Land Use Plan goals:
Goal 1. General Growth /Development
Town of Vail Page 3
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the
visitor and the permanent resident.
1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural
resources should be protected as the Town grows.
1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever
possible.
1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing
developed areas (infill areas).
1.13 Vail recognizes its stream tract as being a desirable land feature as well as
its potential for public use.
Goal 2. Skier /Tourist Concerns
2.1 The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while
accommodating day visitors.
2.4 The community should improve summer recreational options to improve year -
round tourism.
2.5 The community should improve non -skier recreational options to improve
year -round tourism.
2.7 The Town of Vail should improve the existing park and open space lands
while continuing to purchase open space.
Goal 6. Community Services
6.1 Services should keep pace with increased growth.
6.2 The Town of Vail should play a role in future development through balancing
growth with services.
6.3 Services should be adjusted to keep pace with the needs of peak periods.
3. The extent to which the master plan demonstrates how conditions have
substantially changed since the adoption of the subject regulation and how the
existing regulation is no longer appropriate or is inapplicable; and
The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan is a compilation of several previous master
planning efforts for Ford Park. The most recent planning document created for Ford
Park was the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Update. Prior to that, it was the 1997
Town of Vail Page 4
Ford Park Management Plan. In the past 15 years, many of the plan recommendations
have been constructed and implemented. The existing planning documents are no
longer effective as each still remains in effect yet the documents sometimes provide
conflicting direction. Through the compilation of the planning documents, any conflicts
in direction are addressed and one, new singular planning document is created.
4. The extent to which the master plan provides a harmonious, convenient,
workable relationship among land use regulations consistent with municipal
development objectives; and
The applicant is proposing changes to the goals, objectives, and policy statements of
the Ford Park Management Plan as adopted in 2012 and 1997. The applicant is
proposing a new master plan to facilitate a variety of park improvements and provide
direction for future decision making regarding proposed improvements within the Park.
Based upon the evidence and testimony presented at multiple public hearings, Staff
believes the updated goals, objectives, and policy statements of the Ford Park
Management Plan as adopted in 2012 and 1997 are appropriate and will result in a
harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with the
Town's development objectives.
IV. RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and
Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town
Council for the proposed 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan based upon a review of
the criteria outlined in Section V of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony
presented at multiple public hearings.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of approval of this request to the Vail Town Council; the Community
Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval
on the adoption of the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan, an assemblage of the
1985 Ford Park Master Plan, the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford
Park Management Plan Amendment, located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage
Road East/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto"
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for the proposed master plan, the
Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the
following findings:
"Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section 111 of October 28, 2013
memorandum to the Planning & Environmental Commission, and the evidence and
testimony presented at multiple public hearings, the Planning and Environmental
Commission finds.
Town of Vail Page 5
That the maser plan is consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted
goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is
compatible with the development objectives of the town, and
2. That the master plan furthers the general and specific purposes of the zoning
regulations, and
3. That the master plan promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare
of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of
the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment
and its established character as a resort and residential community of the
highest quality. "
V. ATTACHMENTS
A. Proposed 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan
Town of Vail Page 6
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park
Master Plan
An Element of the Vail Comprehensive Plan
CA
e; 77
Vol: — —
r V,
,,,
him .:
FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT
Planning and Environmental Commission Draft #4
October, 2013
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan
Prepared for:
The Town of Vail
Prepared by:
Town of Vail Department of Community Development
and
Braun Associates, Inc.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
Vail Town Council
Vail Planning and Environmental Commission
Andy Daley, Mayor
Bill Pierce, Chair
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Pro -tem
Henry Pratt, Co -Chair
Kerry Donovan
John Rediker
Susie Tjossem
Susan Bird
Margaret Rogers
Pam Hopkins
Greg Moffet
Michael Kurz
Kevin Foley
Luke Cartin
Vail Recreation District
Vail Valley Foundation
Art in Public Places
Betty Ford Alpine Gardens
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction 1
2. Site Assess ment/Existing Conditions 5
3. History of the Park and Previous Planning Efforts 9
4. Goals, Objectives, Policies and Action Steps 18
5. Ford Park Sub -Areas 35
6. Illustrative Plan 53
7. Park Management 62
8. Appendix 64
Due to the volume of material, the information listed below is provided in a
separate document, the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix.
• Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973, authorizing the purchase (by condemnation) of the
property known as the Antholz Ranch.
• The Vail Plan, 1974
• Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, naming the property commonly known as the
Antholz Ranch to Gerald R. Ford Park.
• The Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final Report,
1985
• Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, designating the seven acres around the Nature
Center as an area to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural
history.
• Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988, amending the 1985 Master Plan to add four
tennis courts and to change the location of the aquatics center.
• Ford Park Management Plan, 1997
• Ford Park Management Plan Update, 2012
• BFAG Building — Site Evaluation Matrix, 2013
• Betty Ford Alpine Gardens — Site Evaluation, August 15, 2013
DRAFT
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Update
October 2013
"Whereas, President Gerald R. Ford has brought to the Town of Vail his
interest and encouragement; has shown through his private life and public
life a commitment to recreation, the environment and places set aside
therefor; and believes that a statement of the community's appreciation
and respect for Gerald R. Ford is appropriate and called for; that the
property commonly referred to as the Anholtz Ranch is hereby named the
Gerald R. Ford Park."
Resolution approved by Vail Town Council, January 18, 1977
Chapter 1 - INTRODUCTION
The Town of Vail acquired the 38 acre Anholtz Ranch in 1973 for the stated purpose of
"improving the quality of life in the community." Since that time the property has
increased in size to more than 47 acres and has evolved into one of Vail's most widely
used and highly cherished assets. The evolution of the Anholtz Ranch to what has
become Ford Park was originally contemplated by one of Vail's earliest planning efforts:
"The intended use program is a comprehensive one and eventually the
park will include an impressive number of facilities in addition to extensive
open tun` space and the delight of the natural earth forms and mature tree
growth adjacent to Gore Creek."
The Vail Plan, 1974
The goal of this master plan update is to maintain the essence of what Ford Park (the
Park) is today and what was envisioned for the Park in 1974 — a combination of natural
open space along the Gore Creek corridor coupled with recreational, social and cultural
uses and facilities to serve the needs of residents and guests of Vail. The 2013 Gerald
R. Ford Park Master Plan (the Plan) will provide the town and community with a "guiding
document" for the Park for the next ten years. The primary purposes of this Plan are to
protect the Park from over development, to define expectations for the use of the Park,
and to assist the Town in decision - making regarding capital improvements and other
changes proposed to the Park. Only those changes deemed to be in compliance with
applicable elements of this Plan will obtain approvals from the Town.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 1
The Town has completed four planning efforts for the Park. These plans have directly
influenced the development of Ford Park and each has contributed to the role the Park
plays in the community. These previous planning efforts were:
1974 Vail Plan — While the primary purpose of this plan was to address
Vail's growth and development, it did include a chapter on recreation and
defined at a very broad level the role Ford Park could play in providing
recreational, cultural and community- oriented uses.
1985 Gerald R. Ford Park /Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final
Report — At the time this plan was prepared; ballfields, tennis courts, and
parking had already been developed and construction of an amphitheater
had commenced. The purpose of this plan was to "guide the future
development of the park and establish guidelines for the implementation of
improvements."
1997 Ford Park Management Plan — This plan was initiated in response to
several development proposals for the Park. The plan was a product of
extensive focus group and public input sessions and in essence served as
an amendment to the 1985 plan.
2012 Update to the Ford Park Management Plan — This plan was done to
acknowledge improvements proposed for the Park that were initiated
when Vail voters approved re- allocating a portion of the Convention
Center Funds to Ford Park.
Summaries of these previous plans are found in Chapter 3.
While the impetus for these planning efforts varied, each involved extensive community
input, debate, and at times, controversy. These planning processes revealed the
community's intense passion for the Park as town staff, elected officials and the public
worked to find the appropriate levels of development and activity for the Park.
The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan presents a compilation of these previous
planning efforts along with new direction and ideas that have evolved from this latest
planning effort. The primary objectives of this Plan are to:
• Incorporate key elements of previously completed plans for Ford Park into one
document, specifically those guiding principles that have successfully shaped the
development of the Park from its inception,
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 2
• Establish clear expectations for the future use, development and management of
the Park,
• Define effective tools for decision - making regarding the future of the Park, and
• Provide a single, comprehensive document to serve as the master plan for Ford
Park.
With the adoption of this Plan, previous plans for Ford Park will be archived and no
longer used as guides for future decision - making or planning for the Park. The 2013
Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan will serve as the Town's sole planning document for
the Park.
Elements of this Plan
This Plan includes the following chapters:
1. Introduction
The section provides an introduction to the plan, the purpose of this planning
effort and outlines the major elements of the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master
Plan.
2. Site Assessment and Existing Conditions
This section explains how site and surrounding conditions influenced the initial
planning and design of the Park. .
3. History of the Park and Previous Planning Efforts
The 1997 Plan has provided the basis for this history and background of the Park
and the summaries of the four previous planning efforts that have taken place.
Site plans of the Park produced during these planning efforts are to provide a
history and context for how the Park has evolved over the years.
4. Goals, Objectives, Policies and Action Steps
While the 1997 Plan provided a framework for this section, the goals, objectives,
policies and actions steps have been refined to better express the current vision
for the Park.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 3
5. Ford Park Sub -Areas
Seven sub -areas are used to describe specific areas of the Park, their unique
features, the role they play in the Park, how they will be managed and provide
recommendations for improvements that could occur in the future.
6. Illustrative Plan
The 2013 Illustrative Plan is a refinement of the 2012 Illustrative Plan, it depicts
existing improvements and at a general level describes improvements that may
occur in the future.
7. Park Management
This chapter provides a brief summary of the various management and
operational aspects of the Park that are managed by the Town of Vail.
8. Appendix
Documents relative to the history of the Park and previous park planning efforts
are provided in a separate document, the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan
Supplemental Appendix.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 4
Chapter 2 - SITE ASSESSMENT /EXISTING CONDITIONS
Located immediately east of Vail Village, the proximity of Ford Park to Vail Village and
the convenient access it affords residents and guests is one of the Park's most
significant attributes. This is no coincidence as the 1974 Vail Plan documented how the
location of Ford Park was a key factor in it being purchased for a community park and in
defining the initial vision for the Park to be a major center of cultural and recreational
activity for the community.
"all properties of significant size within the Town limits were researched
and the recommendation made that the Anholtz property, adjacent to
development at the east end of the Village, was the only site satisfying the
recreational uses anticipated. Selection criteria included such factors as
ease of walking distance from the Village, adequate space within a single
parcel for large, meadow -like tun` areas, proximity to the Frontage Road
for simple and direct access by autos or buses, natural beauty such as the
Gore Creek provides, and directness of connection to major bicycle and
pedestrian trails. "
The Vail Plan, 1974
When purchased, the original Anholtz property was +/ -38 acres. Today, Ford Park is
approximately 47.1 acres. The four areas of the Park and their acreages are depicted
below:
Main Park
+1- 20.3 Acres
Uore CreeklNak , Center �-
soccer Fi
eld
*/- 5,5 Ames
2013 C .Id x. 1aa curl 1
Ford Park, 2013
In January of 1977, Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, was passed re- naming the
Anholtz Ranch to the Gerald R. Ford Park. A copy of this resolution is included in the
2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 5
Existing Conditions
In the past forty years many improvements have been made to Ford Park. Foremost
among these are athletic fields, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, the Betty Ford Alpine
Garden, a children's playground, the Vail Nature Center, the Vail Tennis Center and
parking and transit facilities. Infrastructure necessary to serve the Park is largely in
place and vehicle and pedestrian access to and within the Park has been established.
With the exception of the Gore Creek Corridor, the majority of the Park has been
improved with buildings, facilities or other related site improvements.
Access and circulation is a key factor in how the Park functions. On -site parking is
provided, but in keeping with the original concept for the Park the amount of parking is
limited to / -200 spaces along the Frontage Road and +/ -65 spaces at the Soccer Field.
Parking for major Park events is provided in the Town's parking structures. Access
from these structures to the Park is provided by pedestrian corridors and the Town's
transit system. Pedestrian access is provided via the Gore Creek Trail, a sidewalk
along the South Frontage Road and by two bridges in the Golden Peak neighborhood.
The Park's main transit stop is located on the South Frontage Road with additional
stops on Vail Valley Drive. These stops are served by the in -town shuttle and by
dedicated express bus service during special events.
Site Characteristics and Park Desian
Physical characteristics of the land and the relationship of the Park to surrounding uses
and facilities influenced the earliest design concepts for the Park. Significant influences
in the early design of the Park include the South Frontage Road (that establishes the
north boundary of the Park), Gore Creek and adjoining wetland and riparian habitat (that
run the entire length of the Park), site topography, vegetation and views.
Topography of the main portion of the park between the Frontage Road and Gore Creek
includes a prominent and well- defined grade change that creates an "upper bench" and
"lower bench ". Over time this grade change, created in large part by grading from the
construction of Interstate 70, became a point of demarcation for the predominantly
active recreation uses on the Upper Bench and the cultural and passive recreation uses
on the Lower Bench.
Much of Ford Park was initially developed without the benefit of a detailed design or
development plan. The 1974 Vail Plan did, however, set the stage for the future of the
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 6
Park by defining a number of basic design parameters for how the Park could be
developed. There are many examples of how these basic design parameters and
existing site characteristics directly influenced the design and development of the Park.
Parkina and Transit
These facilities were located on flat terrain immediately adjacent to the South
Frontage Road and on the perimeter of the Park. This location minimizes the
impacts of vehicles on other areas of the Park.
Athletic Fields
Fields were located on what at that time was the Park's broadest expanse of
relatively flat terrain. Not only did the fields "fit" on this portion of the Park, the
flat terrain minimized the need for site grading and associated site disturbance.
The fields also provide a buffer between highway noise and other quieter areas
of the Park.
The Amphitheater
The Amphitheater essentially straddles the grade transition between the Upper
and Lower Bench. This location allowed the Amphitheater to utilize sloping
terrain to create terraced seating areas within the Amphitheater. This location
also affords stunning views to the Gore Range.
Nature Center
The Nature Center is located within the relatively undeveloped Gore Creek
Corridor. The natural character of the creek corridor provides a fitting location for
the environmental education programs offered by the Nature Center.
The 1985 Ford Park Master Plan spoke eloquently about the philosophy of good park
design and the role site conditions and characteristics should play in the design
process.
"Compatibility of the park development within the environment is the most
significant aspect of the master plan. The existing landscape is an integral part of
each plan and not merely a backdrop against which the plans are staged. This is
essentially necessary with parklands, for there we expect the landscape to be
stable, pleasant and above all, functional. Accordingly, the planning and design
process was founded on a sound understanding of the features and dynamics of
the park site environment.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 7
Just as a tapestry is woven from many threads of different colors, textures and
strengths, so the landscape is composed of a variety of components such as
slopes, soils, plant communities and aquatic features. Each of these must be
identified and described, but more than that, the role of each must be understood
as a dynamic entity so that limitations and opportunities can be properly
understood. This involves the translation of forms, such as slopes and soil type,
into processes, such as runoff and soil leeching, and the definition of critical inter-
relationships among them."
1985 Ford Park Master Plan
Integrating improvements with the landscape in order to create a pleasant and
functional park should be the goal of any park design. While developed without the
benefit of a comprehensive, detailed design plan, the major elements of the Park have
been located and designed in a manner that is very responsive to site conditions and
other influences. Ford Park today reflects many elements of the original vision for the
Park as outlined in the 1974 Vail Plan and as further defined by the 1985 Ford Park
Master Plan.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 8
Chapter 3 - HISTORY OF FORD PARK and PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS
During the past forty years the Town of Vail has completed four major planning efforts
for Ford Park. This chapter summarizes the purpose, process and outcome for each of
these planning efforts and provides information on the history and development of Ford
Park.
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973 (a copy of which is included in the 2013 Ford Park
Master Plan Supplemental Appendix), authorized the purchase (by condemnation) of
the property known as the Antholz Ranch. At that time the 38 -acre park site
represented the last remaining parcel of undeveloped land central to use by all
residents and visitors of the Vail community. The ordinance listed a variety of possible
uses for the property including the following:
• for park and greenbelt purposes,
• to preserve the natural and physical character of the area to be condemned,
• for bicycle, equestrian and hiking trails,
• for children's playground,
• for performing arts and civic center,
• for a ski lift and related facilities,
• for picnic areas,
• for recreational facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools, gymnasium, ice
skating rink,
• for theater and assembly halls, convention center, public schools,
• for possible exchange or trade of condemned land, or a portion thereof, with
other property which may exactly meet the needs of the town, and
• to construct and maintain water works, transportation systems, and other public
utilities relating to public health, safety, and welfare.
The four major planning efforts for Ford Park include:
The Vail Plan, 1974
The Vail Plan was completed in August of 1973 and adopted in 1974 (a copy of this
plan is found in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix). In the early
`70's Vail pressures from growth and development were radically changing the
character of Vail and the primary purpose of the Vail Plan was to help the town respond
to growth pressures with the goal of "creating a recreationally -based community of
individuality, beauty and pleasure that can be unique in the United States." The plan
included a chapter on the town recreation system. The Antholz Ranch property was
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 9
mentioned as "the only site capable of satisfying the anticipated recreational needs of
the community ".
The Vail Plan's vision for the Anholtz Ranch was to create a "major community park -
cultural center." A wide range of potential uses for the park were identified:
• a place for showing and creating art, crafts, etc.,
• an indoor theater and an 800 seat outdoor amphitheater,
• meeting rooms and community workshops,
• wide outdoor terraces and natural landscapes
• indoor ice arena,
• tennis and handball courts
• children's play facilities and space for family activities,
• headquarters for the Annual Vail Symposium and local television,
• a possible location for an ecologium (nature center), and
• a grammar school.
As a balance to this extensive program of uses and facilities for the Park, the Vail Plan
contemplated the preservation of the Gore Creek corridor as a passive, "quiet place" to
enjoy the natural beauty of the site.
The plan called for 200 surface parking spaces to meet the daily parking needs of the
park. Parking for major events was planned to be provided in the Vail Transportation
Center with town transit and various trails and bikeways providing alternative means to
access the Park. The Vail Plan also depicted a potential road connection at the east end
of the park that would link the Frontage Road with Vail Valley Drive.
While the Vail Plan did not include a detailed design plan for the Park, the conceptual
site plan below provided a vision for how the Park could be developed. A number of
existing park improvements reflect some of the basic concepts from the 1974 Plan.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 10
� s
f j
a J
P
C
� l RuevlC on Pawn jTs , �`
Conceptual Plan for Ford Park, Vail Plan, 1974
Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan, 1985
In August of 1985 the Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan
Development Final Report was adopted by the Town Council (a copy of this plan and
Resolution No. 19, Series of 1985 is found in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan
Supplemental Appendix).
When the 1985 planning process was initiated, improvements in the Park were limited
to athletic fields, tennis courts and parking. A foundation for an amphitheater was in
place but this project was not yet completed. At that time the very eastern end of the
Park along the Frontage Road was utilized as a snow -dump.
The purpose of the 1985 plan was to prepare a more detailed plan for the future
development of the park and to establish guidelines for the implementation of park
improvements. The master planning process included a Recreation Needs Analysis
Survey and extensive community input via workshops and community meetings. The
outcome of these efforts was an indication of the type and extent of improvements the
community wanted to see in the Park. Alternative site plans were considered and a
final, preferred plan was selected. This final plan included a swimming pool complex,
"neighborhood park improvements" (on the Lower Bench), a pond /skating rink (on the
Lower Bench), and the realignment of the eastern softball field. Development of the
neighborhood park improvements on the lower bench were completed in 1988 and
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 11
included restrooms, playground area, open turf area, picnic facilities, and the west
access road.
The first major structure to be constructed in the Park, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater,
was completed in July of 1987 and shortly thereafter a Parking and Transit Study for the
Amphitheater was completed. This study made five recommendations:
1. the Village Structure should be considered the major parking facility for Ford
Park (with improvements to the signs, sidewalks, and bus service being
necessary);
2. extend shuttle bus service to the soccer field,
3. disallow Frontage Road parking;
4. construct a vehicle turn - around and passenger unloading area at Ford Park;
and
5. do not schedule concurrent events in the Park.
These recommendations validated many of the recommendations for parking and transit
outlined in the 1974 Vail Plan.
V3 _
1
ZI�`�``'f� r'°'�� yam• r y,3 ��� �Y'"r v,"'r fir`
GERALD R.
SARK
PLAN wx .�
MASTER PLAN
DE TEWPMENT
r;
MASTER PLAN:
Ford Park Master Plan, 1985
The 1985 Plan identified a location for an alpine garden and in 1989 the first phase of
the Betty Ford Alpine Garden was completed. Since that time a number of expansions
to the gardens have been completed, including the Perennial Garden, the Meditation
Garden, and the Alpine Rock Garden.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 12
Following approval of the 1985 Master Plan the following steps were taken regarding
the planning of Ford Park:
Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, was passed on November 3, 1987. This
resolution designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an area to be
preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history. Vehicular traffic
was to be restricted and certain policies and procedures for preservation and
maintenance of the grounds and facilities were established by the resolution. (a
copy of resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, is included in the 2013 Ford Park
Master Plan Supplemental Appendix.
In December of 1988, the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District (Now the Vail
Recreation District) and the Town of Vail, requested an amendment to the 1985
Ford Park Master Plan. The two phase amendment was adopted by Council as
Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988. A copy of the resolution is included in the
2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix. Phase one of the
amendment was to allow the construction of four additional tennis courts. Phase
two of the amendment changed the proposed location of an aquatic facility to the
eastern softball field. Funding of the aquatic facility was rejected by voters in a
special election on February 6, 1989. Vail Town Council was presented with a
petition to delete all reference to an aquatics center from the Ford Park Master
Plan in April of 1990. No record of Council action on the petition was found.
While the tennis center building is not mentioned in the Master plan amendment,
the VRD did receive a Conditional Use Permit for the project on May 8, 1990.
The Vail Village Master Plan, adopted in 1990, addresses Ford Park as a specific
study area. This plan acknowledged the use of the Park to accommodate
overflow skier and local parking needs. It recommended that the Park be studied
further as a site for additional skier parking to serve expansion of the eastern
side of Vail Mountain. Action Step #5 under Goal #5 states: Study the feasibility
of an underground (recreation fields would remain) parking structure in Ford
Park. The Parking and Circulation Plan (an element of the Vail Village Master
Plan), identified the western portion of the upper bench for potential parking
beneath the Park, and called for separated bike /pedestrian ways along the South
Frontage Road and Vail Valley Drive.
The Vail Transportation Master Plan, completed in 1993, states that the existing
Ford Park Parking area (at the east end of the Park) should be considered for a
possible 2 -level parking facility with the second level below existing grade. Ford
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 13
Park and the athletic field parking area are also listed as two possible sites for
over -sized vehicles if the lot east of the Lionshead Structure becomes developed.
Ford Park Management Plan, 1997
The planning process that resulted in the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan process
was initiated in June of 1995 in response to several development proposals which had
been formally and informally discussed for the Park. These development proposals
included an Educational Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Garden, a cultural /performing
arts center, expansion of the tennis facility, athletic field fencing, and a community
parking structure. This planning process was also seen as a means for addressing park
management issues such as parking deficiencies, Frontage Road access, pedestrian
access and circulation, access for the elderly and mobility impaired, utilization of the
lower bench, conflicts between uses within the Park, conflicts with adjacent property
owners, and the delineation of financial responsibilities.
At the time the project was authorized the Town Council expressed concern that a new
master plan for Ford Park could result in an excessive amount of new development. In
response, staff noted the intention of the project was to create a management plan as a
means to adequately and consistently evaluate development proposals, with the goal of
limiting development and protecting the character of the Park.
Park leaseholders, two neighborhood representatives and town staff served as the
Stakeholder Group for the planning process and a third party facilitator was retained to
coordinate this effort. The Stakeholder Group developed alternative design solutions
addressing parking, vehicular access, Frontage Road improvements, additional sports
facilities and management policies. These plans were presented to the public in an
open house at the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater in June of 1996.
The open house presentation was a turning point in the process of developing the
Management Plan. Several residents were alarmed by the alternatives included in the
presentation and initiated a grass -roots movement to place a referendum on any future
expansion /development within the Park. This strong public reaction, combined with a
lack of closure within the Stakeholders Group, prompted the Town Council to revise the
process to include more community involvement. Three Focus Group meetings and
public input sessions were held throughout the fall of 1996.
The results of the focus groups and public input sessions and a preliminary master plan
framework were presented to the Planning and Environmental Commission and the
Town Council in late 1996. The PEC and Town Council directed staff to proceed with
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 14
drafting the management plan as an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan
based on the input received and presented. The management plan was adopted in April
of 1997. Major elements of the plan were six goal statements along with objectives,
policies and actions steps intended to define the future direction for the Park. The 1997
Plan also included an Illustrative Plan that identified a number of future improvements.
Foremost among these was identifying a site next to the Soccer Field parking lot for an
Educational Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Garden.
Following approval of the 1997 Management Plan the following related actions were
taken regarding the planning of Ford Park:
Goal #4 of the Vail Village Plan Master Plan (as amended in 1998) addressed
the preservation of "existing open space areas and expansion of green space
opportunities." An action step associated with this goal is to "explore the
feasibility of expanding Ford Park to the west to Vail Valley Drive and /or Slifer
Plaza along the Gore Creek stream tract to provide improved pedestrian and
handicapped access to the Park."
The 2009 Vail Transportation Master Plan identified a wide range of roadway
improvements designed to accommodate traffic levels anticipated to meet 2025
demands. One of these improvements contemplates a roundabout at the west
end of Ford Park to "serve as a means of "u- turning" (eastbound to westbound)
and to potentially serve a future parking structure."
2012 Management Plan Update
In 2012 the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan was updated to reflect numerous
improvements proposed for the Park. Plans to improve the Park were initiated when
Vail voters approved re- allocating a portion of the +/- $9,000,000 Convention Center
Funds to Ford Park. The other stakeholders in the Park also participated in the funding
of these improvements.
The 2012 Update maintained the general direction for the Park as established by the
1997 Management Plan. With only a few exceptions, the 2012 Update suggested no
significant changes to the uses, facilities and activities that currently take place in the
Park. One exception was the 2012 Update included the development of an Education
Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Garden along Gore Creek adjacent to the main entry to
the Gardens. All of the existing major uses in the Park — athletic fields, passive
recreation, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, the Alpine Gardens and Tennis Center
were to remain in place. The Update did not change any of the six major goal
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 15
statements (or related objectives, policy statements and action steps) in the 1997
Management Plan.
S
11"Natme plhn
lf�
Ft!
r
u..
2012 Ford Park Management Plan Update
I
I,
A COM
The most significant changes in the 2012 Update are found in the Illustrative Plan
chapter of the Plan. The Illustrative Plan provided conceptual site plan diagrams and
narrative explanations of improvements suggested for the Park. Many of these
improvements were first identified in the 1997 Plan, others evolved out of discussions
with the Town Council, stakeholders and the community during the winter of 2012.
Many of these improvements were initiated in 2012 and 2013. Foremost among them
were the major re- modeling of the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, re- construction of East
Betty Ford Way, improvements to the parking and transit area, expansion and re-
configuration of the athletic fields and new concession and storage buildings associated
with the fields.
A copy of the 2012 Management Plan Update is found in the 2013 Ford Park Master
Plan Supplemental Appendix
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 16
Time Line of Ford Park Activities:
April 1973
Condemnation of Antholz Ranch, Ordinance 6, 1973
August 1973
Completion of Vail Plan
January 1977
Antholtz Ranch named Gerald R. Ford Park, Resolution 1, 1977
August 1985
Completion of Ford /Donovan Park Master Plan,
July 1987
Amphitheater construction completed
August 1987
Alpine Demonstration Garden completed
November 1987
Preservation of Nature Center, Resolution 27, 1987
December 1987
Vail Valley Foundation lease signed
November 1988
Lower Bench improvements completed
December 1988 Ford Park Master Plan amendment by VRD, Resolution 44, 1988
December 1988 Service agreement with VRD, Resolution 46, 1988
May 1989
Tennis Center receives Conditional Use Permit
July 1989
Alpine Perennial Garden completed
January 1990
Completion of Vail Village Master Plan
February 1990
Aquatic Center rejected by voters in special election
April 1990
Council petitioned to delete Aquatic Center from Master Plan
May 1990
Tennis Center construction completed
June 1991
Alpine Meditation Garden completed
April 1993
Completion of Vail Transportation Master Plan
December 1993
Vail Recreation District agreement renewed
June 1994
Vail Alpine Garden Foundation license agreement signed.
June 1995
Town begins Ford Park Management Plan
October 1996
Council allows Vail Alpine Garden Foundation to proceed through
process with Educational Center plans at Soccer Field parking lot
April 1997
Ford Park Management Plan adopted
1999
Lease with Vail Valley Foundation renewed
2008
Lease with Vail Recreation District renewed
2009
Vail Transportation Plan Update completed
November 2011
Voters approve use of Conference Center Funding for Ford Park
Improvements
May 2012
Completion of 2012 Update to Ford Park Management Plan
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 17
Chapter 4 - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND ACTION STEPS
This plan includes six statements that convey the community's goals for Ford Park.
These goal statements provide broad direction on the preservation of the Park, how the
Park should be used, vehicles, pedestrian circulation, coordination between park users
and financial considerations relative to operations and capital improvements. Each goal
statement includes a series of objectives, policies and action steps. Collectively these
statements reflect input from the Town Council, the community and leaseholders during
the 2013 master plan update process. These statements will be used to provide
guidance in decision - making on the management and use of the Park.
The goals, objectives and policies of this Plan will be considered during the review
process for any new development, changes or improvements proposed for the Park.
Only those proposals deemed to be in compliance with these statements (and other
applicable elements of this Plan) will gain approvals. Project proposals deemed to not
comply with these statements and other applicable elements of this Plan will be denied.
This chapter includes thirty -six action steps. In some cases action steps involve a
single, defined task intended to implement an objective or policy statement. An
example of this would be initiating refinements to the park design guidelines specific to
Ford Park. Other action steps involve on -going tasks. An example would be the
coordination and management of events in the Park. The Community Development
Department, with participation from the Public Works Department, will prioritize action
steps and present recommendations annually to the Planning and Environmental
Commission regarding that year's work program for implementing action steps. The
Planning and Environmental Commission will provide a recommendation that will be
forwarded to the Town Council who will make final decisions on the work program.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 18
Goal #1:
Protect the natural environment along the Gore Creek corridor and ensure that
any new use or building within the Park does not adversely affect the character
and quality of the Park or the overall experience of park users.
Objective 1.1: Limit uses and future development to that which is consistent with these
goals, objectives and policies and is consistent with the Ford Park Sub -Areas and
Illustrative Plan.
Policy Statement 1: Maintain the variety of uses and facilities currently located
within the Park.
Policy Statement 2: Proposals for new (or changes to existing) facilities or uses
that would displace existing public uses will not be permitted unless there is
either a compelling public interest or adequate alternative facilities can be
provided.
Objective 1.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 1.1.1: Draft a new ordinance to exclude those uses listed in
Ordinance No.6, Series of 1973, now considered to be inappropriate, and
to redefine the allowable uses within Ford Park. The following uses that
are allowed and prohibited for Ford Park shall take precedence over
Section 12 -9C -2 of the Vail Town Code concerning the General Use Zone
District:
Allowed Uses
Park and greenbelt
Bicycle and hiking trails
Children's playground
Active recreation
Passive recreation
Outdoor amphitheater
Botanical gardens
Environmental, educational, and historical centers
Picnic areas
Recreation and athletic facilities
Public utility easements
Parking (surface parking /structured parking)
Administrative offices for the operation of uses occurring within the Park
Public Art Display
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 19
Concerts and Special Events Venues
Prohibited uses
Ski lift and related facilities
Civic center, convention /conference center, public schools, gymnasium,
and assembly hall
Equestrian trails
Type III and IV employee housing
Action Step 1.1.2: Review legal descriptions of existing lease areas for the
Vail Recreation District, the Vail Valley Foundation and the Betty Ford
Alpine Garden and modify, as deemed necessary, so legal descriptions
correspond with existing and proposed improvements and uses.
Objective 1.2: Maintain all facilities and uses in the Park at a high level of quality and
establish appropriate review procedures, review criteria and design standards for
evaluating any new development proposals or other proposed changes to Park are
clearly established.
Policy Statement 1: Any proposed development or change to Park facilities or
uses shall conform to the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan, including but not limited
to:
• Goals, Objectives and Policy Statements,
• Sub -Area Plans, and
• Illustrative Plan.
Policy Statement 2: Any new development or change to existing Park facilities
shall be reviewed for compliance with Section 12 -11 -6 Park Design Guidelines of
the Town of Vail Municipal Code, as well as other applicable Town regulations.
Policy Statement 3: Any proposed development or change to Park facilities or
uses shall provide a needed environmental, recreational, educational, cultural or
social benefit to the community.
Policy Statement 4: Maintain and operate existing facilities, uses and functions
within the Park at a high standard of quality reflective of the Vail Brand.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 20
Objective 1.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 1.2.1: With participation of all Park stakeholders, Town staff to
prepare standards which outlines expectations regarding the appearance,
maintenance, and operation of facilities within the Park.
Action Step 1.2.2: Evaluate the park design guidelines in Section 11 -12 -6
of the Vail Town Code and modify as necessary to address design
considerations specific to Ford Park.
Objective 1.3: Preserve and protect the environmentally sensitive areas along the Gore
Creek Corridor.
Policy Statement 1: Uses and improvements within the Gore Creek Corridor
shall be limited to only those prescribed in the Gore Creek Preservation Sub-
area.
Policy Statement 2: No new buildings should be permitted within the Gore
Creek Preservation Sub -area.
Policy Statement 3: Any new improvements within the Gore Creek Corridor
shall respect the 100 -year floodplain and minimize impacts to wetland or riparian
habitats.
Objective 1.3 Action Steps:
Action Step 1.3.1: Evaluate the merits of strengthening preservation
controls within the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area via a conservation
easement or the Natural Area Preservation Zone District "Open Space"
designation.
Action Step 1.3.2: Inventory existing conditions of the creek bank and
vegetation within the Gore Creek corridor, initiate programs to stabilize or
restore these areas as may be necessary.
Objective 1.4: Utilize Ford Park as a showcase for environmental sensitivity and
sustainability.
Policy Statement 1: Encourage all lease holders and events at the Park to
implement comprehensive recycling programs.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 21
Policy Statement 2: Sustainable design and environmentally "friendly" materials
and construction methods be utilized on all new development within the Park.
Policy Statement 3: Maintain, protect and enhance the environmental character
of natural open space areas.
Objective 1.5: Limit the number and scale of buildings and structures within the Park to
no more than necessary to meet the needs of park operations and to provide
appropriate services and facilities to park users.
Policy Statement 1: As an alternative to new buildings, encourage shared or
joint -use buildings and /or facilities among Park lease- holders.
Policy Statement 2: The design of new buildings or structures shall be
integrated with the land with a subtle, understated, low- profile in appearance so
as to not dominate the Park's landscape; "iconic" architecture or building designs
that may be visually distracting are not appropriate.
Policy Statement 3: Park stakeholders may have administrative office space
within the Park, provided that such space is limited in size to no more than what
is necessary only for the management and operation of facilities and uses
located within the Park.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 22
Goal #2:
Provide open space, facilities, and programs within Ford Park to meet the passive
and active recreational, educational, social and cultural needs of residents and
guests of Vail.
Objective 2.1: Provide open space areas within the Park for the passive enjoyment of
nature and to reinforce the Park's connection to the natural environment.
Policy Statement 1: Maintain the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area for the
"quiet enjoyment of nature ", and limit uses and activities within this area.
Policy Statement 2: The primary use of the open turf area within the Lower
Commons Sub -Area should be to provide a place for un- programed and informal
passive recreation. The use of this area for special events should be limited in
frequency and scope in order to minimize impacts on the primary use of this
area.
Objective 2.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 2.1.2: Establish management and operational policies for
special events within the open turf area of the Lower Commons Sub -area.
Action Step 2.1.3: Identify key viewsheds from strategic locations within
the Park and as may be necessary, establish designated view corridors to
ensure the protection of these viewsheds.
Objective 2.2: Utilize Ford Park to meet the community's needs for active recreation
and formal team sport activities.
Policy Statement 1: The Active Recreation and Soccer Field Sub -Areas shall be
managed first and foremost to provide facilties for active recreation and team
sports.
Policy Statement 2: Landscape berms and buffers around active recreation
areas should be maintained and enhanced to mitigate potential impacts of noise
and activity on other sub -areas of the Park.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 23
Objective 2.3: Maintain, and enhance where appropriate, the role of the Park in
providing facilities for the enjoyment and exploration of the arts, music, dance,
education and other cultural pursuits.
Policy Statement 1: Maintain the Ford Amphitheater as the primary summer-
time performing arts facility in the Town of Vail.
Policy Statement 2: Support Art in Public Places in their efforts to continue
public art programs (i.e. interactive events, projects, art installations, educational
activities, etc.) within the Creekside area of the Lower Commons Sub -area (and
other areas of the Park as may be deemed appropriate).
Policy Statement 3: Support the educational programs provided at the Nature
Center and the programs provided by the Betty Ford Alpine Garden.
Objective 2.3 Action Steps:
Action Step 2.3.1: Work with the Vail Valley Foundation on their efforts to
create a new "public plaza" at the entry to the Gerald R. Ford
Amphitheater.
Action Step 2.3.2: Work with the Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation on
their proposal to create an educational and visitor center within the Park.
Action Step 2.3.3: Promote and support the use of the Nature Center and
surrounding area as a center for environmental education programs.
Action Step 2.3.4: In conjunction with the Vail Valley Foundation, evaluate
the feasibility of winterizing the Amphitheater to allow for use of the venue
during winter months.
Objective 2.4: Enhance the use of the Historic School House and preserve the historic
integrity of the building.
Policy Statement 1: Maintain public access to the School House and continue
the utilization of the building in accordance with the terms of the lease with the
Betty Ford Alpine Gardens.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 24
Objective 2.4 Action Steps:
Action Step 2.4.1: Evaluate alternative uses for the School House that
will maintain public access and potentially involve the display of historic
photos and artifacts or other activities in keeping with the historic nature of
the building.
Action Step 2.4.2: Complete an architectural assessment of the School
House and establish a plan to protect and enhance the historic character
of the building.
Objective 2.5: Enhance and restore the Nature Center building and the landscape
surrounding the building.
Policy Statement 1: Limit vehicular access to only those vehicles necessary for
the operation of the building and educational programs.
Policy Statement 2: Uses proximate to the Nature Center should be limited and
shall be consistent with the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -Area.
Policy Statement 3: Restore the architectural integrity of the Nature Center
building.
Objective 2.5 Action Steps:
Action Step 2.5.1: Work with the Vail Recreation District to implement
measures for controlling vehicular access to the Nature Center building.
Action Step 2.5.2: Complete an architectural inventory of the Nature
Center building to define steps that could be taken to restore the historic
character of the building.
Action Step 2.5.3: Reduce the parking areas around the Nature Center
building by reclaiming these areas to a natural landscape condition.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 25
Goal #3:
Reduce vehicular intrusions into the interior of the Park and minimize to the
greatest extent feasible the impact of vehicular activity on users of the Park,
particularly on the passive use areas of the Lower Bench and along pedestrian
walkways.
Objective 3.1: Reduce the presence and frequency of vehicular trips into the Lower
Bench (the Lower Commons, Gardens, Amphitheater and the Gore Creek Preservation
Sub - Areas) of the Park.
Policy Statement 1: Proposals for any new facility or use or the expansion of
any existing facility or use in the Lower Bench shall not generate an unnecessary
or appreciable increase in vehicular activity in the Lower Bench area of the Park.
Policy Statement 2: Uses in the Lower Bench shall operate in a manner that
limits vehicular traffic to the greatest extent possible. Vehicular access to the
Lower Bench of the Park should be limited to: maintenance; delivery of goods or
materials too large or too heavy to be carried by non - motorized means; access
for people with limited mobility; special transportation; and emergency services.
Policy Statement 3: Require all delivery vehicles to utilize East Betty Ford Way
to enter and exit the Lower Bench. Due to difficulties in maneuvering, large
trucks (semi's) shall access the Lower Bench via East Betty Ford Way and may
exit via West Betty Ford Way.
Policy Statement 4: Passenger vehicle access to the Alpine Gardens, the
Amphitheater, AIPP programs or other uses in the Lower Bench shall not be
permitted other than vehicles used to provide access for people with limited
mobility or to deliver goods or materials too heavy to be carried by non - motorized
means.
Objective 3.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 3.1.1: Establish a system for managing truck movements
proximate to the Amphitheater loading dock and for coordinating truck use
of East Betty Ford Way.
Action Step 3.1.2: Coordinate delivery schedules to reduce the frequency
of delivery and service vehicles into the Lower Bench during peak use
time periods.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 26
Action Step 3.1.3: Require stakeholders to utilize on -site storage facilities
to reduce and control the frequency of delivery and service vehicles into
the Park.
Action Step 3.1.4: Improve traffic gate operations and restrictions on both
the east and west ends of Betty Ford Way to eliminate unnecessary and
unauthorized vehicular intrusions into the Park. Consider closing the
western access point of Betty Ford Way to all vehicles except trucks too
large to utilize East Betty Ford Way (for exiting the Park).
Objective 3.2: Utilize the Parking /Transit Sub -area as the primary means for satisfying
the Park's parking and transit needs.
Policy Statement 1: All stakeholders are required to adhere to the Parking and
Transit Management Plan.
Policy Statement 2: There shall be a "no -net loss" of the +/ -200 parking spaces
within the Parking /Transit Sub -Area and the +/ -65 spaces at the Soccer Field
Sub -area. Any net loss of parking spaces shall only be considered when off -set
by a demonstrated improvement or enhancement of public transit use or
alternate means of transportation to the Park.
Policy Statement 3: Provide parking for daily park -use within the Parking /Transit
Sub -Area and utilize the Vail Village Parking Structure to satisfy peak parking
demands of the Park.
Policy Statement 4: Maintain a central trash /dumpster facility within the
Parking /Transit Sub -area and mandate all Park leaseholders use the central
facility.
Objective 3.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 3.2.1: Town Staff, with coordination from Park stakeholders,
shall prepare a Parking and Transit Management Plan, to include, but not
be limited to the use and access of parking lots, fee structures, transit
operations, etc.
Action Step 3.2.2: As demand warrants, continue operation of the In -Town
bus route beyond Golden Peak to provide service along Vail Valley Drive.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 27
Action Step 3.2.3: Implement an improved wayfinding sign program
directing pedestrians from the Village Parking Structure and Slifer Square
in Vail Village.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 28
Goal #4:
Provide a safe, enjoyable and efficient pedestrian circulation system within Ford
Park and between Ford Park and Vail Village.
Objective 4.1: Provide clear and effective directional and informational signs to and
within Ford Park.
Objective 4.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 4.1.1: Develop a comprehensive sign plan to direct Ford Park visitors
from Vail Village and from each level of the Village Parking Structure to
destinations within Ford Park.
Objective 4.2: Encourage and promote park users to access the Park via pedestrian
routes from Vail Village and the Vail Transportation Center.
Policy Statement 1: The five existing pedestrian access points to the Park from
Vail Village and Golden Peak should be maintained and enhanced to maximize
their effectiveness in providing access to the Park.
Policy Statement 1: Encourage leaseholders in Ford Park to utilize their
marketing efforts to promote walking, biking and the use of Town buses as an
alternative to driving to the Park.
Objective 4.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 4.2.1: Implement enhancements to the Gore Creek Trail that
will improve safety, grading, surfacing, and lighting.
Action Step 4.2.2: Evaluate opportunities for additional seating areas,
public art and other features to enhance the walking experience along the
Vail Village Connector (within the Gore Creek Sub -area) and where
appropriate provide rest /sitting areas along all pedestrian routes to the
Park.
Action Step 4.2.3: Establish gateways or portals (signage, monuments,
landscape elements, etc.) at the main entries to the Park (Frontage Road,
Gore Creek Trail, Manor Vail, Slifer Plaza, Vail Valley Drive and the
Parking /Transit Sub - area).
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 29
Objective 4.3: Improve internal pedestrian circulation within Ford Park.
Policy Statement 1: New developments or other improvements in the Park shall
not diminish the quality of the pedestrian circulation system and when
appropriate shall include provisions to improve pedestrian circulation.
Objective 4.3 Action Steps:
Action Step 4.3.1: Upgrade the portion of Betty Ford Way within the Lower
Commons Sub -area to create a high quality pedestrian corridor with
improved surface materials, lighting, seating and landscaping.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 30
Goal #5:
Maintain compatible relationships between all venues and all uses within Ford
Park.
Objective 5.1: Manage the carrying capacity of the Park by scheduling events to
prevent overlapping or simultaneous events that exceed the availability of community
parking or other park infrastructure.
Policy Statement 1: The Town of Vail through its designee shall coordinate with
leaseholders an annual schedule for events and uses at all Ford Park venues.
Policy Statement 2: No one event or type of use will be allowed to dominate the
usage of the Park.
Policy Statement 3: The Park is a Town of Vail community facility and in the
case of conflicting uses, functions that best serve the interests of the community
will have the highest priority. In all cases, final decisions regarding the use of the
Park shall rest with the Town of Vail.
Policy Statement 4: The day -to -day management and coordination of activities
in the Park will be assigned to the Town of Vail. The Town of Vail, through its
designee, will coordinate as necessary with representation from the Vail Valley
Foundation, the Betty Ford Alpine Garden and the Vail Recreation District.
Objective 5.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 5.1.1: Expand the master schedule kept by the Town Clerk to
include all venues within the Park.
Action Step 5.1.2: Hold preseason event /activity coordination meetings
with all affected stakeholders.
Action Step 5.1.3: Hold semiannual (or as deemed necessary)
coordination and input meetings with the Town of Vail, leaseholder
representatives, and neighborhood and adjacent property owner
representatives.
Objective 5.2: Provide sufficient separation, berms and landscape buffers between
facilities and uses.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 31
Policy Statement 1: The adequacy of berms and landscape buffers between
different facilities and uses shall be considered when evaluating proposed
changes to the Park. The type and extent of buffers to be provided shall be
determined based on the nature of the use, the site design of the proposed
facilities or uses, and the design parameters outlined in the Ford Park Sub -Areas
and the Illustrative Plan.
Policy Statement 2: Maintain and where necessary improve existing berms and
landscaping between facilities and uses.
Objective 5.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 5.2.1: Enhance existing landscape buffers between tennis
courts adjacent to the Active Recreation Sub -area and the Parking /Transit
Sub -area and evaluate the need to enhance landscape buffers between
other uses throughout the Park.
Objective 5.3: To foster a spirit of cooperation between all leaseholders within the Park
regarding their use of the Park and how to collectively use and manage the Park for the
benefit of all.
Policy Statement 1: Encourage the shared use of buildings and facilities.
Policy Statement 2: Decisions regarding proposals for new buildings or
improvements are to be made in the best interest of the Park and the Vail
community, not just in the interest of the leaseholder.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 32
Goal #6:
Delineate financial responsibilities among Ford Park leaseholders and the Town
of Vail for both on -going maintenance /operation and capital improvements.
Objective 6.1: Equitably share the costs of park management and operations with Park
lease- holders.
Policy Statement 1: All Ford Park leaseholders shall participate in cost sharing
with the Town of Vail for common operating costs at a level proportionate to the
leaseholders benefit from or relationship to said operation or management cost.
(or as may be outlined in current lease or license agreement). Management and
operations cost may include but are not limited to, electrical for pedestrian path
and parking lot lighting, trash removal, and parking lot and pedestrian path
maintenance costs.
Objective 6.1 Action Steps:
Action Step 6.1.1: Town staff to complete an inventory of existing park
operations and associated costs, and in conjunction with park
leaseholders, quantify the level of benefit realized by each leaseholder
from such operations.
Action Step 6.1.2: Research current lease, license and use agreements to
determine existing financial responsibilities of each lease holder.
Action Step 6.1.3: With input from the Town Council,work with
leaseholders to modify existing leases to correct any inequities in utility
billing procedures and distribution systems, current utility use, and cost
sharing relationships.
Objective 6.2: Establish equitable cost sharing agreements for Park capital
improvement costs.
Policy Statement 1: Ford Park leaseholders desiring to make capital
improvements within their respective lease areas shall be required to provide
funding for those improvements and for any modifications outside of the lease
area necessitated by such improvements.
Policy Statement 2: Services, functions, and programs provided by Ford Park
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 33
leaseholders bring visitors to the community who generate sales tax revenues
which in turn contribute to the General Fund. Residents of the community which
participate in those programs contribute to the Real Estate Transfer Tax through
real estate transactions. Both of these funding sources can be utilized by the
Town of Vail to pay for capital projects and improvements within Ford Park,
reducing the need for contributions from the leaseholders.
Objective 6.2 Action Steps:
Action Step 6.2.1: Create and maintain a five year capital improvements
program for Ford Park.
Action Step 6.2.2: Establish the benefit/cost relationship for capital
projects to determine appropriate cost sharing agreements.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 34
Chapter 5 - FORD PARK SUB -AREAS
The topography of the old Anholtz Ranch is typical of a western Colorado riverfront
ranch — a broad expanse of flat land adjacent to the river corridor and an upper terrace
elevated above the river. In the early years of Ford Park these two distinct areas came
to be referred to as the Upper Bench and Lower Bench.
"The basic structure of Ford Park is comprised of two broad terraces, or benches as
locally referred to, which step down the north side of the Gore Creek and is typical of
mountain, valley and stream physiography."
1985 Ford Park Master Plan
Ford Park topography 11985
Early plans for Ford Park (the Vail Plan) anticipated recreation - oriented uses (and a
number of buildings) on the Upper Bench with passive open space areas and an
amphitheater on the Lower Bench. Initial development of the Park included athletic
fields, tennis courts and parking facilities on the Upper Bench. Decisions on locating
these uses on the Upper Bench were made based on the terrain (availability of flat land)
and accessibility to the Frontage Road. Passive open space and the development of an
amphitheater were initiated on the Lower Bench. These plans and the early
development of the Park reinforced this Upper Bench /Lower Bench distinction. Over
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 35
time the Upper Bench came to be regarded as recreation - oriented while the Lower
Bench was regarded as being more oriented to cultural uses and passive open space.
The characterization of athletic use on the Upper Bench and passive and cultural uses
on the Lower Bench remains valid today, and the terms Upper Bench and Lower Bench
provide a good, albeit generalized description of the Park. However, to discuss the
future of Ford Park in terms of just the Upper and Lower Bench does not acknowledge
the many subtleties and distinctions throughout the Park that need to be considered in
this master planning process. It is for this reason that sub -areas are used to more
clearly articulate the goals and objectives for specific areas of the Park. Sub -areas are
intended to provide a forum for defining the unique areas of the Park, where
improvements or changes may be acceptable and where improvements and changes
may not be acceptable.
The seven sub -areas described below were defined based primarily on the existing
uses and site characteristics within the Park. In some cases, sub -areas define one
single use. Examples of these include the Amphitheater and Alpine Gardens Sub - areas.
In other cases sub -areas include a number of related uses. Examples of these are the
Gore Creek Preservation and Lower Commons Sub - areas. In many cases the
pedestrian corridors that link the sub -areas and facilitate the movement of people
throughout the Park are used as boundaries between sub - areas.
The sub -area boundaries were defined based on a variety of considerations. They
should not be considered hard, inflexible parcel lines. It is reasonable to anticipate that
when considering future improvements for the Park some latitude with the location of a
sub -area boundary may be appropriate. Any consideration to modify a sub -area
boundary shall be made in the context of the goals for the Park and for that particular
sub -area.
The use of sub -areas to better understand how the Park functions and to express how
the Park may change in the future is not an attempt to divide the Park into parts.
Rather, the sub -areas provide an effective means for discussing the unique areas of the
Park in the context of the goals and objectives for the entire Park. With Ford Park the
adage "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" clearly applies.
The diagram below depicts the seven sub -areas defined for the Park. The narrative that
follows addresses the following considerations for each sub -area:
• Existing uses and facilities,
• The role the sub -area plays in the overall context of the Park,
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 36
• The relationship of the sub -area to adjoining sub - areas,
• Improvements or changes that may be appropriate at some point in the future,
• Any parameters or other limitations relevant to the future uses and activities
within the sub -area, and
• Any other considerations.
Sub -area discussions address the Park at a fairly broad, master planning level. More
specific discussion of potential future improvements that may be appropriate for the
Park is found in the Illustrative Plan Chapter of this Plan.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 37
\
V\ /
.
\ \
K�\
)
\ \\'
/ [
Z |
\�=
/ !!
� 22/
) �
\�z
/
Draft # $ECG §e&
2013 Gerald m Ford Park Master Plan Page 38
Parking /Transit Sub -area
The Parking /Transit Sub -area provides on -site parking for the Park and includes a
transit stop, a passenger car drop -off area and a central trash /storage facility.
Strategically located along the South Frontage Road and on the periphery of other park
facilities and uses, this sub -area plays a vital role in how the Park functions by
separating parking and vehicles from other areas of the Park. The transit facility is a
key component of the Park by facilitating direct bus service to the Town's parking
structures (which provide parking for peak demand days). This parking /transit concept
had its origins in the original planning of the Park.
"This major community park- cultural center will contain parking for more
than 200 cars and will also be served directly by the Town bus system.
Major parking will be accommodated in the transportation center."
Vail Plan, 1974
Since the mid -70's the parking plan for Ford Park has been to provide daily use parking
at the Park with parking for special events provided at the Town's parking structures.
This parking plan was validated by a parking and transportation study for the
amphitheater completed in 1979. This parking plan remains valid today. Functional
transit facilities along with pleasant, safe pedestrian corridors between the Park and the
Village Parking Structure are key elements to ensure the on -going effectiveness of this
parking plan.
Prior to making improvements to the athletic fields in 2013 (to be completed in 2014) the
Park had approximately 200 on -site parking spaces. The athletic field expansion
displaced approximately 50 parking spaces at the west end of the parking lot. These 50
spaces were re- established by re- designing other portions of the parking lot,
maintaining the approximately 200 on -site parking spaces.
A "no net loss of parking" policy is in effect for the +/ -200 on -site parking in this sub-
area. Any proposed reduction to existing on -site parking spaces will only be considered
in conjunction with concurrent improvements to alternative means of transportation to
the Park. An example of this would be reducing the number of parking spaces in order
to improve transit facilities.
The parking lot was designed such that it can continue to be used for concerts and
other special events. It is anticipated that this use will continue.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 39
LLT
Future Improvements
With parking lot and transit improvements scheduled to be completed in the fall of 2013
and spring of 2014, it is anticipated that the Parking /Transit Sub -area will adequately
address the needs of the Park for the foreseeable future. Improvements that may be
considered in the future include:
• Design and installation of park entry features at the two pedestrian portals from
the parking lot into the Park.
• Installation of traffic control devices (gates or other means) at the east and west
ends of Betty Ford Way.
The potential improvements listed above are also described in the Illustrative Plan
section of this Plan.
The idea of constructing structured parking below the existing surface parking lot has
been discussed in the past. This could accomplish two objectives — increase the supply
of on -site parking (parking that could also address other town needs) and allow for
some alternative use on top of the structured parking. On a related note is the idea of
developing parking below the tennis center and re- constructing the tennis center on the
surface of the structure. While structured parking could create new opportunities for
these areas of the Park, costs would be significant. Based on studies completed in
2009 -2010 the Town Council determined structured parking to not be feasible. If or
when this idea is discussed in the future, an initial step would be to evaluate
implications on the goals for the Park and if necessary initiate amendments to this Plan.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 40
Active Recreation Sub -area
This sub -area is the focal point of active recreation, team sports, tournaments and other
special events. The location of these uses is consistent with some of the earliest design
direction established for the Park. It is expected that these uses will continue in order to
meet the community's needs for active recreation facilities.
Significant plantings have created a landscape buffer between these active recreation
uses and other surrounding uses. These buffers should be maintained and continually
enhanced where necessary. Specific attention should be given to enhancing
landscaping between the Frontage Road and the athletic fields. This improvement
would provide a buffer between the Park and the road and also provide shade for
spectators. Noise and other compatibility issues with use of the athletic fields and
adjacent uses will need to continually be managed (refer to Goal 4 in Chapter 4 of this
Plan).
Future Improvements
Improvements to the Active Recreation Sub -area initiated in 2012 (expected to be
completed in 2014) were extensive and included expansion and re- organization of the
athletic fields and construction of a new restroom /storage building and a new
concession /restroom building. It is anticipated that these improvements will address the
active recreation needs of the community for the foreseeable future. Potential
improvements contemplated for this sub -area are:
• Design and installation of park entry features at the west end of the Park along the
Frontage Road and the two pedestrian portals from the parking lot.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 41
• Ongoing enhancement of the landscape buffer around the perimeter of the Sub-
area.
• The 2009 Town of Vail Transportation Plan contemplates a roundabout at the west
end of Ford Park to "serve as a means of "u- turning" (eastbound to westbound) and
to potentially provide access to a future below grade parking structure. No detailed
design work on this improvement has been done, but conceptually this roundabout
could be located just west of the athletic fields.
The existing Tennis Center is located between the Parking /Transit Sub -area and other
portions of the Park. East Betty Ford Way provides convenient and pleasant pedestrian
access to the Lower Bench of the Park along the southern end of the Tennis Center.
However, the tennis center presents constraints to establishing a convenient and
graceful pedestrian entry between the parking /transit area and the rest of the Park. If or
when the relocation of one or more tennis courts is considered, study should be given to
how improved pedestrian flow and new uses could be established in this area. By way
of example, the removal of the two courts adjacent to the Frontage Road and the
Athletic Field concession building would not only allow for a much improved "arrival
sequence" for pedestrians, but could also provide land for new facilities.
The Tennis Center building has been in existence for over 25 years and the design of
the building is inconsistent with the architectural character of buildings recently
constructed in the Park. If or when this building is to be re- developed, consideration
should be given to a design more consistent with the design objectives for the Park.
The possibility of locating an education center for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens within
Ford Park is discussed in the Alpine Garden Sub -area. The preferred location for this
building is along West Betty Ford Way. If the West Betty Ford Way site is subsequently
determined to not be a viable location, the Tennis Center site is a suitable alternative.
The potential site for this building is proximate to or integrated with the Tennis Center
building. Coordination and cooperation from the VRD will be necessary if this site is to
be pursued.
As with the parking lot area, the idea of constructing structured parking below the
athletic fields has been discussed in the past. It is expected that if and when this idea is
pursued that an initial step would be to evaluate implications to the overall goals for the
Park and if necessary initiate amendments to the Ford Park Master Plan.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 42
Lower Commons Sub -area
The Lower Commons Sub -area plays an important role in the Park by providing
structure, or organization to the overall design of the Park. The area provides a
transition zone between other uses in the Park and Betty Ford Way, which runs through
the sub -area, and provides a delightful arrival experience for pedestrians entering the
Park from the West. The Lower Commons Sub -area also provides some of the Park's
most important and popular facilities that collectively address a number of goals and
objectives for the Park. Specifically, the Lower Commons Area provides places for
recreational use, public art, the passive use and the quiet enjoyment of the Park. The
sub -area also provides buffers between Park uses, a transition to the Gore Creek
corridor and creates an important sense of openness within the Lower Bench.
This sub -area should continue to be managed to provide the uses and park features
listed above. There are no major changes contemplated to the three distinct, yet related
uses that occur in this sub -area. These three uses are:
Children's Playground
The playground is an immensely popular area of the Park. This use should continue.
While refinements and /or upgrading of play structures and facilities within the
playground may be made in the future, the basic size or "footprint" of the playground
should remain unchanged. The restrooms at the playground provide facilities for the
entire Lower Bench and there is a need to upgrade these facilities in the near future in
order to meet the demands of park users. No other buildings are contemplated in the
playground area.
Open Turf Area
Aside from natural open space areas along Gore Creek, the open turf area is the only
area of the Park that is not programmed with organized uses and activities. It is
important that this area remains open and available for informal use by patrons of the
Park in the future. The area provides space for picnics, rest, informal games and other
passive recreation use. The turf area also provides an important buffer, or transition
from the more actively developed areas of the Park and the Gore Creek Corridor.
Given this areas adjacency to Betty Ford Way, it is critical to limit vehicles in this area of
the Park in order to prevent conflicts between park users and vehicles.
With the exception of very minor encroachments from landscape improvements,
lighting, seating and other similar features associated with improvements planned for
Betty Ford Way, the open turf area should not be reduced in size and no buildings or
structures should be permitted in this area. In the past the southern end of the open turf
area has been used for events (weddings, parties, etc.) that have involved the
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 43
placement of temporary tents and other features within the turf area. While these
events may continue, the number and extent of such events should be limited and
events that would monopolize the open turf area and prevent its use by other users of
the Park should not be permitted. Any events in the open turf area should be managed
in accordance with Park procedures, specifically to minimize the time temporary
facilities are in place, minimize the number and extent of vehicles necessary to service
the event, etc.
0
Cr d
Lower
Commons
a,e
Turf
Area
�r
Creekside Area
The Creekside area is a narrow strip of land south of Betty Ford Way and north of Gore
Creek. A few small structures (i.e. the "art shack, an open air picnic shelter) are located
in this area. Arts in Public Places (AIPP) may pursue remodeling or enhancing the art
shack at some point in the future. AIPP has placed permanent art installations in this
area and also runs summer art programs in this part of the Park. Art programs may
include activities such as interactive events, educational and participatory activities, and
temporary are installations. The passive use and the limited number of permanent
improvements within this area make it an excellent transition to the more natural,
undisturbed Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan
Page 44
The use and character of this area should remain unchanged. No new buildings should
be permitted. New art installations may be appropriate, but if pursued, they should be
done in a way that minimizes impacts to other surrounding uses and facilities and is
sensitive to the natural landscape.
Future Improvements
Improvements contemplated for this Sub -area include:
• Upgrading restroom facilities at the children's playground.
• Further enhance the buffer between the athletic fields and the children's playground.
• Additional art installations within the Gore Creek Corridor.
• Upgrade to Betty Ford Way to include a slight widening of the walkway, decorative
pavers, seating areas, lighting and other streetscape improvements.
The restroom and Betty Ford Way improvements are described in greater detail in the
Illustrative Plan chapter.
Amphitheater Sub -area
An outdoor amphitheater was contemplated in original plans for Ford Park dating back
to 1974. Completed in 1987, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater has evolved into Vail's
most prominent venue for music, dance and other cultural events. The facility is
managed by the Vail Valley Foundation and is host to approximately 60 events each
summer. The amphitheater is considered one of the community's most important
cultural assets.
In 2013 the Foundation completed an initial phase of improvements to the amphitheater.
Improvements included re- contouring the lawn seating, new restrooms, expansion of
concession areas, and other improvements. While not a project of the Foundation, the
Town of Vail recently made major improvements (decorative pavers, widening, and
reduction to grade of walkway) to East Betty Ford Way. The Foundation has plans for a
second phase of improvements to the Amphitheater that would create a new "public
plaza" at the entry to the Amphitheater.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 45
The relationship between the Amphitheater and the neighboring athletic fields will need
to be continually monitored to ensure compatibility between these (and all) park users is
maintained. It is important to protect and enhance areas of existing vegetation in and
around the Amphitheater and where appropriate improve the physical buffers between
these uses. The implementation of noise mitigation at the north end of the amphitheater
to minimizing noise impacts from the athletic fields and Interstate 70 has also been
discussed. The Foundation has completed acoustic studies of the amphitheater and
concluded that mitigating noise impacts from the fields and Interstate 70 would have the
unintended consequence of impacting sound quality within the amphitheater. As such,
noise mitigation is not being pursued.
The Amphitheater is a significant generator of people and also generates a significant
amount of vehicular traffic into the Lower Bench. Vehicular traffic into the Lower Bench
conflicts with a number of goals and objectives for the Park. It is important for the Town
and the Vail Valley Foundation to continue to work together to minimize vehicular traffic
to the Amphitheater. No new uses or expansion of existing uses at the Amphitheater
that would generate appreciably more vehicular traffic into this area of the Park should
be permitted. Managing and limiting vehicle traffic that may result from the proposed
public plaza will be an important consideration in establishing operational standards for
this new facility.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 46
Future Improvements
Potential improvements contemplated for the Amphitheater Sub -area include:
• Development of a "public plaza" at the entry to the Amphitheater.
• Restoration of the stream bank adjacent to the Amphitheater south of Betty Ford
Way and east of the pedestrian bridge,
• Upgrading of the fence /screening of the utility installation along Gore Creek west of
the pedestrian bridge.
There are a number of important parameters to be considered in the design and
development of the public plaza. These parameters are described in greater detail in
the Illustrative Plan chapter of this Plan.
Alpine Gardens Sub -area
What began with completion of a demonstration garden in 1987 has evolved into a +/-
1.5 acre network of perennials, rock gardens and waterfalls hosting an array of high
alpine plants. The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens (BFAG) provides an important
educational and experiential element of the Park. The gardens and the mission of the
organization are in keeping with one of the original goals for Ford Park to provide
environmental and educational facilities for the community. The Alpine Gardens have
become one of Vail's most popular summer attractions.
The Alpine Gardens has pursued the development of an "alpine education center" in the
Park for a number of years. The 1997 Ford Park Management Plan identified the
location for this facility to be within the Soccer Field Sub -area. During the 2012 Ford
Park Management Plan Update the BFAG proposed a location adjacent to Gore Creek
for the education building and the 2012 Plan recommended this site for a new building.
The Town Council subsequently reconsidered this recommendation from the 2012
Update, and while expressing support for the BFAG to develop an educational building
within the Park, initiated a new evaluation of site alternatives for the building.
The Town Council's primary criterion for selecting a site for the educational center
building was that it not be located on the Lower Bench. Seven sites were evaluated,
three of which were determined to be viable sites for the building. The BFAG Building
Site Evaluation Matrix outlines the factors considered in this evaluation. A copy is found
in the Supplemental Appendix.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 47
For a variety of reasons the preferred location for this building was determined to be
adjacent to West Betty Ford Way just west of the Children's Playground. Located
directly on the grade transition between the upper and lower bench, the Town Council
determined that this location conforms to their site selection criteria that the building not
be located on the lower bench. The other two sites that were considered viable
alternatives are at the Soccer Field and within the Tennis Center. These sites could still
be considered if following further study it is determined that the Betty Ford Way site is
not viable.
The primary purpose of the building is to provide educational programs for the
community and accordingly the uses within the building are expected to include rooms
for interpretive displays, meeting /class rooms, a greenhouse and a limited amount of
administrative space necessary to support on -site operations of the gardens.
Future Improvements
Potential future improvements within the Alpine Garden Sub -area include:
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 48
• Development of an alpine garden educational center.
Extension of the gardens along the northeast entry in order to create a buffer
from the adjoining athletic fields and improve pedestrian arrival to the Gardens.
There are a number of important parameters to be considered in the design,
development and operation of the educational center. These parameters are described
in greater detail in the Illustrative Plan chapter of this Plan.
Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area
The Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area includes the entire length of the Gore Creek
Corridor that passes through the Park. The sub -area is more than 21 acres in size and
is generally defined by the park boundary on the south and the 100 -year flood plain, the
50 -foot Gore Creek setback and /or topographic features on the north. Gore Creek,
associated wetland and riparian habitat and stands of specimen trees are the primary
features of the creek corridor. Existing improvements within this sub -area are limited to
bridges, trails, utility improvements and the Nature Center.
The Gore Creek corridor is the Park's most significant natural feature and provides the
Park with delightful open space for the quiet enjoyment of nature. The corridor also
provides a critical pedestrian link to Vail Village. The designation of this corridor as a
preservation zone is in direct response to a number of goals and objectives from
previous park planning efforts. The preservation of and enhancement to this area is
also suggested by Goal #1 of this Plan. It is essential that adjacent uses respect the
natural environment of this sub -area and that affective buffers be maintained between
other more intensive uses within the Park.
It is intended that existing uses and improvements within the Gore Creek Preservation
Sub -Area be maintained and in keeping with the goals of preserving this area no new
buildings are to be constructed within the sub -area. Any other new uses or
improvements should be limited to those that will complement the natural character of
the creek corridor and will minimize impacts to this sensitive environment.
Resolution No. 27 of 1987 designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an
area "to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history." The
resolution stipulated that "vehicular traffic is to be restricted and certain policies and
procedures for preservation and maintenance of the grounds and facilities" should be
enacted. It is acknowledged that the Nature Center will bring a certain level of activity
to this sub -area. Nature Center activity should be concentrated on the "upland" portions
of the Nature Center in order to minimize impacts to the creek corridor.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 49
Improvements within the sub -area should be limited to low- impact improvements such
as soft surface walking paths, creek enhancements to improve fish habitat, fishing
access, re- vegetation and creek /stream bank restoration projects. In all cases such
improvements should be designed and constructed in a manner that minimizes
environmental impacts (i.e. avoid wetland habitat and wetland, maintain existing natural
vegetation, use of "best management practices ", etc.). The underlying goal of any new
trail development and /or bridge crossing should be to improve access in order to
enhance awareness of this important natural environment.
Utility improvements should not be located within this sub -area unless no other practical
alternative is available.
The Gore Creek corridor between the main portion of Ford Park and Slifer Square
provides important pedestrian access to and from the Park and Vail Village (and the Vail
Village Parking Structure). This corridor is heavily travelled and provides access to the
Park for many park users. Enhancing the walking experience along the corridor will
ensure its effectiveness as an alternative means of accessing the Park.
•
M
A
Fishing access to Gore Creek, while currently not an issue (i.e. excessive use from foot
traffic resulting in damage to riparian areas and vegetation), could become an issue in
the future. A creek access point was considered at the east end of the Nature Center
(using the bus turnaround on Vail Valley Drive as an unloading area) was discussed
during the 1997 Planning effort but was rejected as being contradictory to the intended
use of the Nature Center.
An Action Step suggested for this area (refer to Chapter 4 of this Plan) is to evaluate the
benefits of establishing a conservation easement for this area or to apply the "Open
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 50
Space" designation via the Natural Area Preservation Zone District. The protection
afforded by either of these steps would define more permanent limitations on the use of
this area and in doing so establish a degree of permanence in preserving this creek
corridor.
The existing condition of the Nature Center Building and the surrounding area has been
a point of discussion. Potential improvements to the Nature Center are further
discussion in Chapter 6 — Ford Park Illustrative Plan.
Future Improvements
Future improvements contemplated for this Sub -area include:
• Enhancement and restoration of vegetation along the creek corridor, creek bank
stabilization and fishing habitat enhancements.
• Enhancements to the walkway between Vail Village and the Park to include
improvements such as seating, art installations, etc.
• Design and installation of park entry features at the three pedestrian portals to
the Park along the Gore Creek Corridor.
• Initiate steps to improve the physical condition of the Nature Center.
These improvements are discussed in greater detail in the Illustrative Plan chapter.
Soccer Field Sub -area
The Soccer Field Sub -area, while often overlooked as an element of Ford Park,
provides a valuable community asset. The full -sized athletic field serves the soccer and
lacrosse communities, the sand volleyball courts are heavily used and the 65 -space
parking lot is used year- around. A cul -de -sac at the east end of the sub -area allows in-
town buses to turn around when providing express service to Ford Park. These uses
should continue as they directly address the broad goals for the Park of "providing the
recreational needs of the community" (1985 Plan) and is consistent with the objective of
locating active recreation areas "away from the meadow and creek" (1985 Plan).
Separated from the rest of Ford Park by Vail Valley Drive and physically removed from
the more developed portions of the Park, the Soccer Field Sub -area does not have
compatibility or relationship issues with surrounding uses or facilities. No major
changes are contemplated to the existing recreational facilities in this sub -area.
While no major improvements are anticipated in the near future, the Soccer Field sub-
area is unique from the rest of the Park. For example, the uses and activities in this
sub -area do not impact other areas of the Park, the sub -area has direct vehicular
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 51
access that does not impact other park users, and the sub -area has no direct impact on
the Gore Creek Corridor. For these reasons this sub -area could be a suitable location
for new park uses or buildings to meet the future needs of the Park. If or when new
uses may be proposed for this sub -area, consideration should be given to applicable
elements of this Plan, how the proposed use could affect surrounding uses, private
covenants and other considerations.
-.1,._
Future Improvements
Potential future improvements within the Soccer Field Sub -Area include:
• Expansion of the existing sand volleyball courts.
• Expansion of landscape buffers.
The possibility of locating an education center for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens within
Ford Park is discussed in the Alpine Garden Sub -area. The preferred location for this
building is along West Betty Ford Way. If the West Betty Ford Way site is subsequently
determined to not be a viable location, the Soccer Field site has been determined to be
a viable alternative. The potential location for this building is at the northwest corner of
the sub -area. Private covenant issues (with the neighboring Northwoods
Condominiums and with the Vail Village Seventh Filing) will need to be addressed prior
to constructing an education center on the soccer field site.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 52
Chapter 6 - FORD PARK ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN
The Ford Park Illustrative Plan provides a general description of future improvements
contemplated for Ford Park. The Plan indicates the general location of the
improvements, a summary of the proposed improvements and parameters or criteria to
be considered in the design, development and operation of the improvement. The
design parameters and criteria are of particular importance as they establish specific
expectations for the proposed improvement. Conformance with these parameters and
criteria is a requisite to the Town approving any improvements in the Park.
The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan discusses a wide range of potential
improvements for the Park. The design and development of some improvements are in
progress. Other these improvements are only general ideas and will need further study
and design, an example being the installation of art along the Gore Creek Corridor
connection to Vail Village to enhance the walking experience. Other improvements are
not viable in the near -term but could be viable at some point in the future, examples
being structured parking under the athletic fields or a Frontage Road roundabout at the
west end of the Park.
It is not the intention of this Plan that only those improvements depicted on the
Illustrative Plan may be proposed for the Park. Improvements not depicted on the
Illustrative Plan may be proposed and will be reviewed relative to their conformance
with the goals, objectives and policies for the Park and the applicable Ford Park Sub-
areas. It should also be noted that the improvements being depicted on the Illustrative
Plan does not ensure if or when they will be implemented.
Any improvement proposed for the Park is subject to approval by the Town Council and
further review by the Town's review boards prior to being implemented. This review
may involve the Planning and Environmental Commission (Conditional Use Permit,
Development Plan review) and the Design Review Board prior to being implemented.
On the following page is the Ford Park Illustrative Plan. This Plan includes numbers
which identify future improvements to the Park. Narrative descriptions of these
improvements follow.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 53
i P
s..
A
i
x
s
0
9
9
`o
6
C7
to
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 54
Improvement #1 — Gore Creek Corridor Restoration
There are a number of areas within the Gore Creek corridor where erosion, over -use or
other factors have disturbed or otherwise adversely impacted existing vegetation. A
restoration program should be implemented to improve vegetation along the creek
corridor. Restoration will improve the visual quality of this area and improve water
quality by preventing erosion. A detailed assessment of the creek corridor is necessary
in order to determine precisely where and to what extent restoration is needed.
Following completion of this assessment, a detailed landscape plan for the restoration
of the corridor should be prepared and implemented.
A parallel effort should be to evaluate the condition of the creek bank in order to identify
the potential need for stream bank stabilization to protect the bank from erosion.
Another opportunity to consider for Gore Creek is how pools or other features could be
created in the creek to improve the quality of fishing or potentially improve the creek for
other uses. A detailed assessment of the creek corridor is necessary in order to
determine precisely where and to what extent these improvements may be feasible.
Following completion of this assessment a detailed improvement plan for the creek
corridor could be prepared.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #1, Objective 1.3, Action Step 1.3.2.
Improvements #2 — Gore Creek Village Connector
The Gore Creek corridor between the west end of Ford Park and Slifer Square provides
important pedestrian access to and from the Park and Vail Village (and the Vail Village
Parking Structure). Enhancing the walking experience along this connection will
improve its effectiveness as an alternative means of accessing the Park. The
installation of seating areas, creek overlooks and public art are examples of
improvements that could be made to animate this walkway.
All improvements shall be outside of wetland areas, the 100 -year flood plain or other
environmentally sensitive areas. An inventory of the creek corridor to identify such
areas should be completed prior to initiating any improvements.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #4, Objective 4.2, Action Step 4.2.2.
Improvement #3 — Entry Monuments at Park's pedestrian entries
Pedestrians arrive to Ford Park from one of seven existing entries as identified on the
Illustrative Plan. Currently there is inadequate signage or other features identifying
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 55
these locations as entry points to the Park. The goal of this improvement is to formally
identify these portals and announce them as gateways, or arrival points to Ford Park.
Landscape features, signage, bollards, monuments, archways or other design features,
or some combination thereof, could be used to identify these locations. Landscape
enhancements to areas proximate to these entries may also be appropriate. A design
process is necessary to determine design solutions for these improvements. While
specific solutions for these park entry improvements could vary between locations, all
should share a common design vocabulary. It will also be important to locate these
improvements in a way that compliments the adjacent pedestrian corridor and does not
compromise pedestrian circulation.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #4, Objective 4.2, Action Step 4.2.3.
Improvement #4 — Betty Ford Alpine Garden Education Center
The education center is envisioned to include multi -use space for year- around
educational programs and other activities, a greenhouse and limited administrative
space. Below are design, development and operational parameters and /or criteria to be
considered in the detailed design of this facility.
• Building and site improvements provide adequate clearances from
existing utility lines and drainage improvements and when necessary
such lines or improvements are relocated to provide adequate
clearances.
• A building of not more than 3,000 square feet that is low -scale in
appearance, does not visually dominate the surrounding area and
does not visually loom over West Betty Ford Way.
• Provide appropriate horizontal separation from West Betty Ford Way in
order to not diminish the quality of this walkway.
• Ability to construct the project in a manner that does not adversely
impact other facilities or uses in the Park.
• A viable access management plan designed to minimize to the
greatest extent feasible the number and frequency of vehicles
accessing the education center. It is acknowledged that a service
vehicle or delivery vehicle may occasionally need to drive to the center.
However, daily or frequent vehicle access by staff or patrons of the
center will not be permitted
• Acceptable emergency vehicle access to the building and identification
of any site improvements necessary to accommodate such access.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 56
• Identify the anticipated parking demand from the building and how it
will be addressed.
• Adequate storage space to meet the operational needs of the building
and to minimize the need for vehicle trips to the building.
• Coordination with the Vail Recreation District on the need to expand
fencing at the athletic fields to protect the building from errant balls.
The site plan and cross - section are conceptual studies for how a building could be
designed on this site. While provided by the Betty Ford Alpine Garden, these sketches
do not represent a development or design proposal. They are merely depictions of how
the building could be designed and there is no implied approval of the concepts
depicted below.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 57
gore creek
"living roof"
line of "observation
deck" in fu-egiound
,_4
enGy multi-
'. - purpose
west betty family education
ford way center
roof canopy w/
exposed d existing
structu re ex g
�raoftopterrace fiel c
ds
CONCEPT SECTION
sCAI E: P'= 1d -o"
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2.3, Action Step 2.3.2.
volunteers
Improvement #5 — Nature Center
Over the years a number of additions and modifications have been made to the nature
center building. Many of these changes have altered the historic character of this
building. An assessment of the building should be completed in order to understand
steps that could be taken to restore the architectural integrity of this building and the
surrounding area.
Other improvements to the Nature Center include re- claiming the informal parking areas
proximate to the building and taking steps to limit vehicular access to the site. These
site improvements would most efficiently be designed in conjunction with the evaluation
of the building.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2.5, Action Step 2.5.1- 2.4.3.
Improvement #6 — Ford Amphitheater Entry Upgrade /Public Plaza
The Vail Valley Foundation has proposed plans for transforming the existing
Amphitheater entry into a re- designed and re- purposed Public Plaza. The plaza is
intended to provide a more gracious and more functional entry to the amphitheater. The
design intent and objective of this improvement is to create a multi -use outdoor space
that serves as the primary arrival for the Amphitheater as well as a pre- convene and
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 58
post- function space during scheduled events. The Public Plaza would also provide a
venue for smaller gatherings hosted by other park leaseholders and also be open for
public use when not being used for scheduled events.
Other elements of the Public Plaza include a tensile roof covering, a tribute to the Ford
Family, a small stage within the courtyard, a new donor wall, enhancements to the
concession building and ticket windows, and new entry gates to the Amphitheater.
Parameters and criteria to be considered:
• Plaza design should be done to facilitate /not encumber truck turning movements
necessary to provide loading /delivery to the Amphitheater.
• Plaza design should be sensitive to and integrated with immediately adjacent
improvements at the Alpine Gardens.
• Trees removed to accommodate the Public Plaza should be re- located within the
Park and to the extent feasible be relocated proximate to the amphitheater.
• The space should be available for use by the public when not being used for
private functions.
• The space should be available for gatherings that support other Park
stakeholders (TOV, VRD, BFAG and AIPP).
• Any structures /roof elements associated with the public plaza should harmonize
with the Amphitheater, not dominate the surrounding area, and conform to the
Town's park design guidelines.
• Any fencing that may be required to define the courtyard space or for liquor
license or other purposes should be subtle and visually unobtrusive. Landscape
materials should be used to soften the appearance of the fence.
• A viable management plan for minimizing vehicular access to the social
courtyard (employees, service vehicles, deliveries, etc.), and for servicing
the facility in a manner that minimizes impacts on pedestrian use of Betty
Ford Way.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2.3, Action Step 2.3.1.
Improvement #7 — Children's Plavaround Restrooms
The playground restrooms provide facilities for the entire Lower Bench. These facilities
are under -sized and in need of upgrade and expansion to meet current demand. When
designed, the new bathroom building should be one level and be sized no larger than
necessary to meet the needs of park users. The location currently considered for the
new restrooms is west of the existing facility where play apparatus are currently located.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 59
New play apparatus will be provided with the removal of the existing restroom building.
The building should not encroach on the adjacent open turf area.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2. 1, Action Step 2.1.1.
Improvement #8 — Betty Ford Way
The central portion of Betty Ford Way between the Covered Bridge and the
Amphitheater is envisioned to be a "feature pedestrian corridor ". This pedestrian way
will be treated with a higher level of design, surface materials, lighting, seating, etc.
Enhancements to Betty Ford Way will improve a park visitor's experience to and
through the lower bench of the park.
It is anticipated that the existing path will be widened from approximately 10 feet to
between 11 and 13 feet to accommodate the multiple user types that visit the park at
peak use times and to reduce conflicts when Amphitheater /golf cart shuttles share the
path with pedestrians. The path surface will be replaced with finer textured, higher
quality pavements such as colored concrete, stone or concrete pavers. Seating areas
with benches at select locations along the path, landscape enhancements, lighting and
wayfinding may also be incorporated into this design.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #5, Objective 4.3, Action Step 4.3.1.
Improvement #9 — Betty Ford Way Traffic Control
While it is acknowledged that the Alpine Gardens, the Amphitheater and other uses in
the Lower Bench require vehicular access, an underlying goal for the Park is to
minimize vehicular traffic in this area. Betty Ford Way provides car and truck access to
this area. As a means for better regulating traffic into the Lower Bench, the installation
of gates, bollards or other improvements will be necessary at either end of Betty Ford
Way. In addition to improvements designed to limit car and truck access to the lower
bench, a system for managing large truck use on East Betty Ford Way should also be
explored. This section of Betty Ford Way is essentially a one -lane road. The purpose
of this effort is to prevent two trucks from utilizing East Betty Ford Way at the same
time.
Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #3, Objective 3.2, Action Step 3.2.3.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 60
Improvement #10 — Frontage Road Round -about
The 2009 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update recommends a "future access to Ford
Park" with a roundabout along the Frontage Road at the west end of the Park. This
roundabout would address two things — it could provide access to a future underground
parking garage and it could provide a means of "u- turning" (eastbound to westbound)
vehicles exiting from the Village Parking Structure. The Plan states that this roundabout
would be done "in association with parking additions" at the Park. The Town recently
studied the feasibility of developing a parking structure below the athletic fields and for a
variety of reasons this idea was determined to not be feasible. Development of the
roundabout will likely not be initiated until such time parking beneath the fields is
pursued.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 61
Chapter 7- PARK MANAGEMENT
Four organizations play a role in the management and operation of Gerald R. Ford
Park. The Town of Vail is the owner of the Park and manages the community park on
the Lower Bench, the stream tract, parking lot areas and pedestrian corridors. In
addition, the Town provides park management and coordination with the Park's three
leaseholders. The leaseholders manage and operate their respective facilities:
The Vail Recreation District lease includes the Tennis Center, athletic fields and
land that includes the Nature Center. The Tennis Center Building is on land
owned by the Town but was developed and funded by the VRD. VRD offers
environmental education and research opportunities at the Nature Center.
The Vail Valley Foundation manages and maintains the Ford Amphitheater and
immediate surrounding grounds. The amphitheater seats up to 2,500 people and
is scheduled an average of 60 days during the summer months.
The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens manages the Gardens. The Gardens have
developed in four phases that began in 1987.
In its role as the overall park manager, the Town addresses a variety of management
and operational considerations. Often times this requires the involvement of different
town departments and town commissions and boards. Ultimately the Town Council is
asked to review and approve management practices. The Town involves one or more of
the Park leaseholders when addressing these management topics and in some cases
the lease agreements with the Recreation District, Vail Valley Foundation and Alpine
Garden Foundation address these topics. Below is a list of park management topics the
Town is responsible for:
• Parking — Management of parking spaces, allocation of spaces to leaseholders,
rates at times pay - parking is implemented, etc.
• Special events on parking lot, athletic fields and open turf area — coordination
with promoters of events, scheduling, pre and post -event operations, etc.
• Park Calendar — While not responsible for scheduling events within leaseholder
facilities, the Town coordinates (with leaseholders) a comprehensive events
schedule for the Park.
• Transportation — management of transit operations between the Park and the
Vail Transportation Center, including periodic implementation of a Golden Peak
bus route.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 62
AIPP projects — The review of art programs and installations in the Park.
• Proposals for new uses, new building or changes to the Park — The review of any
proposed change to the Park will involve the Town Council and may also involve
the Planning and Environmental Commission, the Design Review Board, AIPP
and the Commission on Special Events.
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 63
Chapter 8 - APPENDIX
An extensive number of documents relative to the history of the Park and previous park
planning efforts have been assembled. Due to the volume of this material, these
documents are provided in a separate document, the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan
Supplemental Appendix. Material found in the Supplemental Appendix includes:
1. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973, authorizing the purchase (by condemnation) of
the property known as the Antholz Ranch.
2. The Vail Plan, 1974
3. Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, naming the property commonly known as the Antholz
Ranch to Gerald R. Ford Park.
4. The Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final
Report, 1985
5. Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, this resolution designated the seven acres
around the Nature Center as an area to be preserved as an example of the Gore
Valley's natural history.
6. Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988, amending the 1985 Master Plan to add four
tennis courts and to change the location of the aquatics center.
7. Ford Park Management Plan, 1997
8. Ford Park Management Plan Update, 2012
9. BFAG Building Site Evaluation Matix
10. Betty Ford Alpine Gardens — Site Evaluation, August 15, 2013
Draft #4 -PEC Review
2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 64
MEMORANDUM
To: Planning and Environmental Commission
From: Community Development Department
Date: October 28, 2013
A request for a worksession to present the conceptual plans for review of the proposed Betty
Ford Alpine Garden Education Center, located at 530 South Frontage Road East /Unplatted, and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation, represented by Zehren & Associates, Inc.
Planner: George Ruther
I. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation, represented by Zehren & Associates, Inc., is
requesting a worksession with the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission to
present the conceptual plans of the proposed Betty Ford Alpine Garden Education Center, to be
located within Ford Park
As this is only a worksession, the Commission is not being asked to take any formal action on
the application at this time. Instead, the applicant and the town staff intend to present
information on the proposed education center as it relates to the following topics:
• Program
• Location
• Size
BACKGROUND
• Architecture and Design
• Review Criteria
• Next Steps
The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master, as drafted, recommends that an education center be
constructed in Ford Park and operated in conjunction with the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. For
instance, Goal #2, Objective #2.3 and Policy Statement #3 each make specific reference to the
role the Ford Park location can play in providing educational opportunities for guests and
residents of the Town. Specifically, the Master Plan recommends, Action Step #2.3.2,
"work with the Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation on their proposal to create an
educational and visitor center within the Park."
To ensure the education center contributes favorably to the park and the experience of park
users, a series of goals, objectives, and policy statements were developed. These goals,
objectives, and policy statements are to be used by the applicant, staff, and decision - makers
when considering future improvements within the Park. The more a proposed application
achieves the stated goals and objectives and adheres to the policy statements identified, the
more likely it is that the application will be approved. Conversely, if it is determined that the
proposed application fails to further the goals, objectives and policies of the Plan, the application
shall be denied.
The proposed location of the Education Center along West Betty Ford Way within Ford Park
garnered a lot of attention throughout the master planning process. As such, at least seven
possible sites were evaluated before a preferred location was selected. To that end, once a
preferred site was identified, an even more in depth study of the site was commissioned by the
Town to ensure that the site was in fact feasible for the construction of a new building. The study
revealed that, with but a few minor modifications, the site was suitable.
According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail, Gerald R. Ford Park is located with the
General Use zone district (GU district). As such, the development and operation of the proposed
education center is regulated by the provisions of GU district. Pursuant to the provisions of the
GU district, the development and operation of the education center requires the approval and
issuance of a conditional use permit and the adoption of an approved development plan for
implementation.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Town staff has identified a number of issues which will need to be addressed in the review of
the development review application for the proposed education center. The Commission is not
being asked to address this issue at this time, but rather, to keep these issues in mind as the
applicant and staff presents the application during the worksession meeting. Issues which need
to be reviewed include:
1. Patron and Employee Vehicular
Access
2. Loading and Delivery Access
3. Availability of Parking
4. ADA Access
5. Appropriateness of Proposed Uses
(incl. special events, hours of
operation, etc)
6. Safety
7. Adequacy of Landscape Buffers
8. Appropriateness of Bulk, Mass and
Scale
9. Compliance with the Master Plan
10. Year Round Access and Use
11. Employee Housing Obligation
12. Provisions of an Operations and
Management Plan
13. Dark Sky Compliant Exterior Lighting
14. Access to Public Restrooms
What, if any, additional issues should be added to the list of issues to be reviewed prior
to the Commission taking final action on the proposed application?
Is there additional information that the Commission would like to have provided to aid in
the decision making process on the proposed application?
RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends the Planning & Environmental
Commission and members of the public engage in a dialogue with the representatives of the
Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation about the proposed project. As this is only a
worksession, the Commission is not being asked to take any formal action on the application at
this time.
2
PEC WORKSESSION
October 15, 2013
Fr-
d
L I SITE CONTEXT & PHOTOGRAPHS �uTY.
7FH RFNANE7 ,4SSC�C1 Al tti In
CN'Ei��.'
Jf r[ V UNL C 141PS,Inc
Gould II� ��
egress path N o
d .
ti perrenial
gadens \ � N
r
0
h older
\ Ong i
function plaza ��
0
Perreelal —
gartlens
`� boulder --
` seating
vlanting
�i1 pacla•ts �`
1
perennial gardens
Lililr,ev�nuast iairi�^.Is�t'ttno-
511t LVI,A[I 1UIN I E��L III
°ring existing athletic
retaining walls fields
—red serving area
fire pit outdoorseahng
C
rorri to
P
retrace
- outdoor xrork
:,. area
V
pockets
existing playground
_ L �
- —stone steps
dto xm w
gand gua rdra'Isl to
0
LUNE –trl UAL M It rLAN I cy
c '
existing
retaining walls
k
a munteer
� space 1 � existing athletic
d' rplunteer fields
N� enVloPe �spare2
Z
" diSBleyi , unteer
rn main - Purpose spate 3
..area existing athletic f'�
seba'ng ving area fields \ ki�i� : ".� alpi�lgoa rden
i"pd •\ \ re ( wpr p
—d—
!/y
�rro R oe sead.,
�S �.w /vi tog ore nng \ yrykJ
r ie faro Park
-
- \ -Ming playground
ieden O ei!s .gp,destr an
h tl" rae( n Path Iregratled to 3%1
"p bserva4nn� \j below igati
tleck"
"alpha house" " f µ
ROOF LEVEL FLOOR PLAN MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
Jf II REV \NU ASC IIIF., C�: I.VN% —tri UAL I-LVVK
��1 =roe -0• PLANS c
IA. Ll
gore creek
L7FH6R F N AN L7 ASSOCI A I JII NL.
'firing rpaf`-
-plod opy
eo( "abservanon exposed wood existing
deck" ' ir bregroynd �slruclure
aokup Serrate athletic
�r fields
entry I— purpose volunteers
west henry family education
(ordway center
CONCEPT SECTION
SCALP, 1"= .
5
l_VIVC.LYI UAL LLLVAI IVIVI 5LL.I IkJN,
AND BUILDING PROGRAM r"
Ad Name: 9657033A
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM
October 28,
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CILCt1:BER
Your account number is- 1OP2P 33
/ PUBLIC WELCOME
75S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
Vail Daily
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visit:
1.Betty Ford Alpine Gardens - 530 S. Frontage
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
Road 45 minutes
1.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council for a prescribed regulations amendment,
pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code,
STATE OF COLORADO }
to amend Section 11- 17 -12, Vehicular Signs, Vail
Town Code, to clarify ambiguous language, and
1 ss
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130026)
I
Applicant: Town of Vail
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
Planner: Jonathan Spence
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND:VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified
90 minutes
2.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper
Council on the adoption of the 2013 Gerald R. Ford
Park Master Plan, an assemblage of the 1985 Ford
Park Master Plan, the 1997 Ford Park Manage -
printed In whole or in part and published in the County
ment Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park Management
of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation
g g
Plan Amendment, located at 530, 540, and 580
South Frontage Road East /.(platted, and setting
forth details in thereto.
therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously
regard (PEC130012)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: George Ruther
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND:VOTE:
more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next pri or to the first
CONDITION(S):
60 minutes
3.A request for a worksession to present the con-
Ppublication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and
g
ceptual plans for review of the proposed Betty Ford
that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice
p q g
Alpine Garden Education Center, located at 530
South Frontage Road East /.(platted, and setting
forth details in thereto.
and advertisement as requested.
regard
Applicant: Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation,
represented by zehren & Associates, Inc.
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION:
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium,
MOTION: SECOND:VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
only or jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
4.A request for the review of a variance from Sec-
RulerOV1SlOn.
tion 12- 14 -17, Setback from Watercourse, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances,
p
Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of
gross residential floor area within the prescribed
setback, located at 1975 Placid Drive Unit 33 /Lot
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
33, Vail Village West Filing 2, and setting forth de-
tails in regard thereto (PEC130025).
published in the regular and entire issue of every
Applicant: Rosslyn May Valentine Residence Trust,
represented by Richard Bolduc
Planner: Joe Batcheller
number of said daily for the period of I
Y h
ACTION: Table to November 25, 2013
consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said
MOTION: SECOND:VOTE:
CONDITION(S): 5
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 10/25/2013 and
minutes al of
2013pminutes September 28, 2013 and October 14,
that the last publication of said notice was dated 10/25/2013
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
in the issue of said newspaper.
6.Information Update
7.Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
In witness whereof I have here unto set m hand this da The applications and information about the propos
y y, als are available for public inspection during regu
11/04/2013. lar office hours at the Town of Vail Community De-
velopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
The public is invited to attend the project orienta-
tion and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Develop -
ment Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be re-
lied upon to determine at what time the Planning
and Environmental Commission will consider an
GenerGeneral Mana er/Publisher/Editor item. Please call (970) e interpretation for additional in-
al Sign language interpretation is available
upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call
Vail Daily (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im-
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for paired, for information.
Community Development Department
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 11/04/2013. Published October 25, 2013 in the Vail
Daily. (9657033)
� 2m.&& 9. -V-�
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public
My Commission expires: November 1, 2015
�pRY PUe/
' PAMELA J.
SCHULTZ
9�� COt -ARP$
My Commismn Expires 1110112015
Ad Name: 9622213A
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM
Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33
vail Daily
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO }
}SS.
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified
representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper
printed, in whole or in part and published in the County
of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation
therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first
publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and
that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice
and advertisement as requested.
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every
number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1
consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 10/11/2013 and
that the last publication of said notice was dated 10/11/2013 in
the issue of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
10/21/2013.
General Man ager/Publisher/Editor
Vail Daily
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 10/21/2013.
� 2M 4,& 9. -V-�
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public
My Commission expires: November 1, 2015
�pRY PUe/
' PAMELA J.
SCHULTZ
9�� COt -ARP$
My Commismn Expires 11/0112015
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and
Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will
hold a public hearing in accordance with section
12 -3 -6, Vail Town Code, on October 28, 2013 at
1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council for a prescribed regulations amendment,
pursuant to 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code,
to amend Section 11- 17 -12, Vehicular Signs, Vail
Town Code, to clarify ambiguous language, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130026)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jonathan Spence
The applications and information about the propos-
als are available for public inspection during office
hours at the Town of Vail Community Develop-
ment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend site visits. Please call
970 - 479 -2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon re-
quest, with 24 -hour notification. Please call
970 - 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im-
paired, for information.
Published October 11, 2013 in the Vail Daily.
(9622213)