Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-0609 PECTOWN OF VAft� PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION June 9, 2014 at 12:30pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT 12:30 pm - Legal Training Matt Mire, Town Attorney 30 minutes 15 Minutes 1. A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -713-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a liquor store, located at 286 Gore Creek Drive (A &D Building) /Lots A and B, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140013) Applicant: 10th Mountain Whiskey Planner: Joe Batcheller ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITIONS: 60 minutes 2. A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to 12 -9C -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for a public and quasi - public indoor community facilities (education center), to allow for the construction of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Education Center, located 530 South Frontage Road /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140005) Applicant: Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, represented by Jack Hunn Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITIONS: 3. A request for the review of a variance from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of an addition within the front setback area, located at 1807 Alpine Drive /Lot 44, Vail Village West Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140012) Applicant: Contro Ituarte, Magdalena Sofia — Moreno, represented by Pierce Architects Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to July 14, 2014 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan, to establish a comprehensive redevelopment plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center, Lot 10 (Town of Vail parking lot), and US Bank Building, located at 181 and 281 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West/ Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, and Lot D -2, A Resubdivision of Lot D Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140011) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Tabled to June 23, 2014 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Page 1 5. A request for the review of variances from Section 12 -7D -9 Landscaping and Site Development Section 12 -7D -10 Parking and Loading, Section 14 -5 -1, Minimum Standards and Section 14 -5 -2 Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, for relief from the minimum landscape requirement, the parking space dimensional requirement, the snow storage requirement and to allow parking in the front setback, to facilitate the construction of a freestanding building with associated parking, circulation and landscape improvements, located at 2171 North Frontage Road West (McDonald's) /Lot 2B, Vail Das Schone Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130018) Applicant: McDonald's USA, LLC, represented by Robert Palmer Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 6. A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -7D -2, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a drive -up facility, located at 2171 North Frontage Road West (McDonald's) /Lot 2B, Vail Das Schone Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130014) Applicant: McDonald's USA, LLC, represented by Robert Palmer Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 7. A request for a variance from Section 14 -3 -1, Table 1, Minimum Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 14 -1 -5, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential driveway to exceed the permitted maximum centerline grade, located at 2754 Snowberry Drive / Lot 15, Block, 9, Vail Intermountain and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140007) Applicant: Mike Dantas, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Joe Batcheller ACTION: Withdrawn 8. Approval of May 19, 2014 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 9. Information Update 10. Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published June 6, 2014 in the Vail Daily. Page 2 TOWN OF VAIt f PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION June 9, 2014 at 12:30pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Michael Kurz Pam Hopkins Dick Cleveland Henry Pratt Webb Martin Luke Cartin John Rediker 12:30 pm - Legal Training Matt Mire, Town Attorney 30 minutes Town Attorney Matt Mire provided the commission with an overview of legal matters related to CIRSA liability and PEC responsibilities. Topics presented included legislative vs. quasi - judicial roles, sunshine laws, meeting protocol, site visits, professional liability, conflict of interests and general ethical standards. Commissioner Rediker asked a question related to findings and code criteria. Mire provided valuable recommendations for how to couch discussions and deliberations within applicable criteria. 15 Minutes 1. A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -713-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a liquor store, located at 286 Gore Creek Drive (A &D Building) /Lots A and B, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140013) Applicant: 10th Mountain Whiskey Planner: Joe Batcheller ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITIONS: 1. Illuminated signs, such as neon, gas filled or LED lit signs, shall not be visible from the exterior of the business. Joe Batcheller gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. Ryan Thomson and Christen Avignon, co- owners of 101h Mountain Whiskey, gave an overview of the proposed business operation. Commissioner Cleveland requested clarification regarding the necessity of a condition of approval related to a liquor license. Planner Spence clarified that distilleries are allowed one off - premise tasting room associated with their state distiller's license and that a liquor license may not be needed. Commissioner Kurz asked a question regarding environmental needs (recycling). Joe Batcheller clarified the recently approved recycling requirements. Commissioner Rediker inquired about length of approval. Page 1 Joe Batcheller stated that there was no proposed limitation on the term of the conditional use permit approval. Commissioners Rediker and Kurz inquired about deliveries. The applicant stated that deliveries would occur in the designated loading and delivery areas during approved time frames. 60 minutes 2. A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to 12 -9C -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for a public and quasi - public indoor community facilities (education center), to allow for the construction of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Education Center, located 530 South Frontage Road /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140005) Applicant: Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, represented by Jack Hunn Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to June 23, 2014 MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 5 -0 -0 Jonathan Spence gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. Commissioner Kurz asked to discuss the review items the PEC discussed last time. Commissioner Cleveland asked to include item #3. Jack Hunn, representing the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, made a brief introduction. Pedro Campos from Zerhen and Assoc., architects, gave an overview of the project. David Keselak, architect, discussed the layout of the proposed building. Pedro Campos continued with the project scope, the last submittal and the current submittal. Commissioner Kurz asked about grade changes on the site and the interface between the BFAG and the playground. Pedro Campos spoke to that. Commissioner Kurz asked about item 1 — parking. Spence said the applicant has responded. Jack Hunn stated the BFAG would like three designated spaces. Commissioner Cartin ask what impacts this would have. Commissioner Cleveland asked if the designated spaces would be for the winter only. Jack Hunn said, "yes." Spence asked for clarification. Commission Kurz asked what variation there is between summer and winter staffing. BFAG staff answered, "none." Kurz continued with a question about parking capacity. Commissioner Cleveland spoke to item #3, that allowing buses on Vail Valley Dr. would be problematic. Spence asked Todd Oppenheimer as to the for clarification. Commissioner Kurz asked why the TOV is involving itself with the operations of the BFAG building. Spence clarified that admin operations have been limited to off -site locations so not to crowd the park with unnecessary uses. Commissioner Cleveland stated the contentiousness of this issue in the past. Jack Hunn stated that the space in question would serve some educational functions. Commissioner Cleveland said it was the applicant's burden to prove the use of the space. Page 2 Issue #6: Commissioner Kurz asked whether this issue needed to be vetted now as it is a design issue. The applicant stated the lighting will be full cut -off. Commissioner Cartin requested the applicant to be mindful of interior lights that could bleed out of skylights, etc. Issue #7 (ADA compatibility): Commissioner Kurz asked why the scope of this issue is seemingly expanded. Spence explained that it is the standard the TOV Chief Building Official will use to analyze ADA compatibility. Commissioners Cleveland and Rediker asked whether or not the applicant would need to upgrade portions of the park that may not be in compliance with ADA standards if those areas are part of the linkage for ADA users. Jack Hunn said TOV should share the costs if so incurred. Spence said the financial burden will be decided by the Town Council. That arrangement will be worked out together between the TOV and the applicant. Issue #8 (bathrooms): JS stated that coupling the bathrooms with the BFAG building was not a requirement. Commissioner Kurz recalled the problematic nature of co- purposing the BFAG bathrooms with the park bathrooms. Cartin: "Todd, are the playground bathrooms year- round ?" Todd Oppenheimer stated no; when they are to be upgraded, they will be done so extended their usability. Jack Hunn spoke to Commissioner Pratt's idea to include a public bathroom; that it was considered but deemed unfeasible. Kurz: "what do you see as the next step ?" Commissioner Cartin asked why the two user groups were deemed incompatible. Commissioner Cleveland said he felt the bathrooms proposed were inadequate. Issue #9 (protective fencing): JS said Todd Oppenheimer has committed to installing higher fencing. Commissioner Rediker asked when does this issue go beyond the reasonable concern; they are building in potentially dangerous area. Jack Hunn spoke to the flight dynamics of flying softballs and felt, based on expert analysis, the danger was insignificant. Commissioner Cleveland said this is a non - issue. Rediker played devil's advocate for the worst case scenario. Issue #12 (ADA routes): JS — this issue has been discussed in issue #7's discussion. Issue #13 (deliveries): JS — truck traffic is to not occur on West Betty Ford West Way with the exception of semi trucks that cannot turn around at the amphitheater. Jack Hunn said he would like to allow deliveries that would already stop at the amphitheater. Commissioners Cleveland and Cartin stated their opposition to more traffic in the park. Rediker asked for clarification on the types of deliveries and proposed an option to deliver to the maintenance shed. JS said staff is looking for a concrete delivery plan from the applicant. Issue #17: Cleveland is not in support of another events center. Jack Hunn said that it is only to serve as an emergency shelter during inclement weather for an event party. Commissioner Cartin stated the importance of snow removal and how it relates to the building code 3. A request for the review of a variance from Section 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of an addition within the front setback area, located at 1807 Alpine Drive /Lot 44, Vail Village West Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140012) Applicant: Contro Ituarte, Magdalena Sofia — Moreno, represented by Pierce Architects Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to July 14, 2014 MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 5 -0 -0 4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan, to establish a comprehensive redevelopment plan for the Vail Page 3 Valley Medical Center, Lot 10 (Town of Vail parking lot), and US Bank Building, located at 181 and 281 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West/ Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, and Lot D -2, A Resubdivision of Lot D Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140011) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Tabled to June 23, 2014 MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 5 -0 -0 5. A request for the review of variances from Section 12 -7D -9 Landscaping and Site Development Section 12 -7D -10 Parking and Loading, Section 14 -5 -1, Minimum Standards and Section 14 -5 -2 Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, for relief from the minimum landscape requirement, the parking space dimensional requirement, the snow storage requirement and to allow parking in the front setback, to facilitate the construction of a freestanding building with associated parking, circulation and landscape improvements, located at 2171 North Frontage Road West (McDonald's) /Lot 2B, Vail Das Schone Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130018) Applicant: McDonald's USA, LLC, represented by Robert Palmer Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014 MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Martin VOTE: 5 -0 -0 6. A request or the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -7D -2, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a drive -up facility, located at 2171 North Frontage Road West (McDonald's) /Lot 2B, Vail Das Schone Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130014) Applicant: McDonald's USA, LLC, represented by Robert Palmer Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014 MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Martin VOTE: 5 -0 -0 7. A request for a variance from Section 14 -3 -1, Table 1, Minimum Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 14 -1 -5, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential driveway to exceed the permitted maximum centerline grade, located at 2754 Snowberry Drive / Lot 15, Block, 9, Vail Intermountain and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140007) Applicant: Mike Dantas, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Joe Batcheller ACTION: Withdrawn 8. Approval of May 19, 2014 minutes MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 5 -0 -0 9. Information Update 10. Adjournment MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 5 -0 -0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional Page 4 information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published June 6, 2014 in the Vail Daily. Page 5 TOWN OF VAIL Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 9, 2014 SUBJECT: A request for a worksession to present the conceptual plans for review of the proposed Betty Ford Alpine Garden Education Center, located at 530 South Frontage Road East /Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC14005) Applicant: Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation, represented by Zehren & Associates, Inc. Planner: Jonathan Spence DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation, represented by Zehren & Associates, Inc., is requesting a worksession with the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission to discuss their responses to questions and issues arising out of the previous worksession for the proposed Betty Ford Alpine Garden Education Center, (BFAGEC), to be located within Ford Park. As this is only a worksession, the Commission is not being asked to take any formal action on the application at this time. Instead, town staff requests the Commission review the responses received and staff's analysis of those responses as they relate to applicable governing documents and provide direction to the applicant as they prepare for a requested public hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission on June 23, 2014. It is important that any remaining issues and concerns be clearly relayed to the applicant at this time. II. BACKGROUND The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan, as approved, recommends that an education center be constructed in Ford Park and operated in conjunction with the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. For instance, Goal #2, Objective #2.3 and Policy Statement #3 each make specific reference to the role the Ford Park location can play in providing educational opportunities for guests and residents of the Town. Specifically, the Master Plan recommends, Action Step #2.3.2, "work with the Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation on their proposal to create an educational and visitor center within the Park." To ensure the education center contributes favorably to the park and the experience of park users, a series of goals, objectives, and policy statements were developed. These goals, objectives, and policy statements are to be used by the applicant, staff, and decision - makers when considering future improvements within the Park. The more a proposed application achieves the stated goals and objectives and adheres to the policy statements identified, the more likely it is that the application will be approved. Conversely, if it is determined that the proposed application fails to further the goals, objectives and policies of the Plan, the application shall be denied. The proposed location of the education center along West Betty Ford Way within Ford Park garnered significant attention throughout the master planning process. As such, at least seven possible sites were evaluated before a preferred location was selected. To that end, once a preferred site was identified, an even more in depth study of the site was commissioned by the Town to ensure that the site was in fact feasible for the construction of a new building. The study revealed that, with but a few minor modifications, the site was suitable. Staff has included the adopted 2013 Gerald R. Ford Master Plan for easy references as Attachment C. According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail, Gerald R. Ford Park is located within the General Use Zone District (GU District). As such, the development and operation of the proposed education center is regulated by the provisions of the GU District. Pursuant to the provisions of the GU District, the development and operation of the education center requires the approval and issuance of a Conditional Use Permit and the adoption of an approved Development Plan. III. REVIEW CRITERIA The proposed development plan has not been fully analyzed at this time against the criteria for approval of a Conditional Use Permit; however, it is prudent to keep these criteria in mind during this worksession review. These criteria are as follows: Sec. 12 -16 -6. Criteria, Findings A. Factors Enumerated. Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the planning and environmental commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use. 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. Town of Vail Page 2 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by chapter 12 of this title. B. Necessary Findings. The planning and environmental commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit. 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of this title and the purposes of the zone district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS Town staff has identified a number of issues which need to be addressed in the review of the development application for the proposed education center. Below, please find the questions posed to the applicant concerning these issues, the applicant's response, and an analysis of the status of the issue based on the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Master Plan. Is the use of the east parking lot in Ford Park going to change to accommodate staff or patrons of the Facility? There are no parking issues in the summer or shoulder seasons. Parking policies are the purview of the TOV. The BFAG intends to request that up to 10 winter seasonal parking spaces be allocated for patrons and staff. Analysis: The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Master Plan, hereafter the Plan, identifies the use of the east parking lot for daily use. The applicant is correct that per the Plan, the TOV is responsible for park management related to parking. The allocation of specific parking spaces for BFA GEC patrons and staff appears problematic and conflicts with Objective 4.2: Encourage and promote park users to access the Park via pedestrian routes from Vail Village and the Vail Town of Vail Page 3 Transportation Center and Policy Statement 2, under Objective 3.2, concerning no net loss of parking spaces. The designation of parking for specific users decreases the overall capacity and efficiency of the Parking /Transit Sub -Area. Staff recommends that the applicant pursue alternative parking arrangements for facility staff that does not diminish overall parking capacity. Additional refinements to address this issue are necessary. 2. What is the vertical distance (in feet) to be traveled from parking to the Facility? The Betty Ford Gardens, the TO playground and the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater all operate successfully today with 40 foot vertical distance between the east parking lot and the lower bench of Ford Park. Analysis: The applicant is correct in their analysis that the vertical distance from the parking facility to the proposed BFAGEC is consistent with other uses in the park. This issue requires no further action at this time. 3. When children arrive for Garden events by bus, where will the buses park and how will the children be guided to the facility? Buses will drop off children, as they do today, either in the East Parking Lot or along Vail Valley Drive. Busses would then park remotely. Children will walk to the garden on Betty Ford Way or from Vail Valley Drive. Analysis: The proposed bus drop off appears consistent with current Park operational plans. The BFA GEC will be required to adhere to the Parking and Transit Management Plan and any revisions to such in the future. This issue requires no further action at this time. 4. What are the intended uses in the facility besides education and administration? Education is the main purpose of the building as well as providing a home for Garden operations. Occasional donor appreciation events will take place at the facility as well. Analysis: The Plan clearly identifies allowable uses for the Park and its various sub - areas. The Plan specifically states within the Alpine Garden Sub- area that the primary purpose of the building is to provide educational programs for the community... and a limited amount of administrative space necessary to support the on -site operations of the Gardens. The provided floor plans appear to designate a significant amount of floor area to "Volunteer Space -882 sq. ft." A Conceptual Building Program provided by the applicant and included with the plan set designates this "Volunteer Space" for three offices. Staff requests that the Commission provide feedback on this proposed allocation of space. A further analysis of this space will be necessary to determine consistency with this adopted policy. Space allocation will have a direct affect on the calculation of employee housing Town of Vail Page 4 mitigation, facility occupancy and parking needs. Additional refinements to address this issue may be necessary. 5. What are the proposed hours of operation? Daytime use only? Winter? Summer? Summer hours would likely be 9 -5pm, seven days /week with the option for some educational programs on summer evenings, such as children's programming during BRAVO events. Winter hours anticipated to be 10 -4pm, M - F with the possibility of some evening events during the holidays or some adult programming to take advantage of "free parking after 3 ". Analysis: The proposed hours of operation are consistent with those seen traditionally within the park. Special events shall be coordinated through the TOV, and leaseholders, through the Park Calendar and Parking and Transit Management Plans. This issue requires no further action at this time. 6. Be aware of implications related to the lighting of the facility (at night). Might there be any reflection off of the sky lights? Night time uses of the facility are expected to be minimal. Exterior lighting will meet the `night sky' requirements. Our design team will pay careful attention to the potential for glare from the proposed skylights as the design progresses. Analysis: Through the Design Review process, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the TOV's Dark Sky lighting requirements, found in Sec. 14 -10 -7, Outdoor Lighting, which requires full cut -off fixtures. Staff is available throughout the process to review proposed lighting fixtures for compliance with these regulations. In addition to reviewing potential glare from the proposed sky lights, staff will be reviewing the proposal for compliance with Plan Policy Statement 2, under Objective 1.4, specifically that "sustainable design and environmentally friendly materials and construction methods should be utilized on all new development within the Park ". Staff requests that the applicant provide a brief narrative demonstrating compliance with this Policy. Additional refinements to address this issue are necessary. 7. ADA accessibility will be a big consideration. Consistent with the language in the Ford Park Master Plan, our facility will be designed to be ADA compliant. Pathways and paving, affected by our construction will also be constructed to be ADA compliant. This will require some slight modifications to the existing pathway system between the top of the gardens and the recreation fields. However, to the extent that there are deficiencies within Ford Park, (or within the town), with respect to ADA compliance, it is unfair to expect that BFAG be held responsible to correct these long- standing deficiencies. Town of Vail Page 5 Analysis: Although not the responsibility of the BFAG to correct long standing deficiencies, it is the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate full compliance with all applicable ADA regulations AND to demonstrate compliance with Policy Statements 1 and 2 under Objective 4.3 Improve internal pedestrian circulation within the park. As a new structure in the park, the BFAGEC must demonstrate compliance with ADA regulations including accessible routes. Accessible routes must be demonstrated from ap rkin_g and /or other entrances. It is necessary that the applicant widen the scope of its analysis in this respect. Additional refinements to address this issue are necessary. 8. Have you considered merging the BFAG restrooms with the playground restrooms? Yes, we have discussed this possibility of combining restroom facilities for the Playground and Education Center with Todd Oppenheimer and Greg Hall on several occasions. We understand that the consolidation of facilities is one of the stated goals of the Ford Park Master Plan. It is simply not feasible or desirable to combine the Playground and Education Center restroom facilities for the following reasons: (1) the location of the BFAG Education Facility is not proximate enough to the Playground and is perceived to be too far away. (2) We believe that the two different user groups are incompatible. (3) The limitations of the prescribed foot print of the proposed Education Center will not accommodate the combined program for restroom facilities. The site cannot be expanded and the total developed area for the Education Center will be maximized to accomplish the program of the just the Education Center and, (4) utility systems and walkways have already been installed to support the Playground Restrooms in the location anticipated in the Master Plan. Analysis: Staff appreciates the applicant's efforts in evaluating the feasibility of providing public restrooms incorporated within the BFAGEF. Further analysis and review by Community Development and Public Works is ongoing. Staff requests that the Commission actively engage with the applicant on this matter at the worksession. Additional refinements to address this issue may be necessary. 9. Be prepared to respond to a perceived 'safety issue' regarding softballs being hit over the outfield fence. Discuss potential solutions with the VRD. Safety within Ford Park is the responsibility of the TOV and the VRD. The potential risk of injury due to an errant softball getting beyond the perimeter fencing of the recreation fields must be considered and mitigated by the TOV and VRD, regardless of the development of the proposed Education Center. However, based on this concern, the TOV and VRD have recently committed to increase the height of the new perimeter fencing from 12' to 20' on the west end of the recreation fields. The rooftop patio, proposed by the BFAG Town of Vail Page 6 will have a fabric cover to shade patrons using the space. This cover will serve to further protect patrons from the possibility of an errant ball coming over the now taller fence. Analysis: Safety within Ford Park is the responsibility of all leaseholders, including the BFAG, and the property owner, TOV. It is the responsibility of the applicant, in concert with the TOV, to work with other leaseholders, specifically the VRD, to ensure that the users of the BFAGEC are protected from errant softballs. The choice of rooftop patio at this location will require protective measures by BFAG to minimize the risk to its patrons. Staff would encourage the applicant to pursue several options such as a retractable system that may offer protection from wayward softballs and overbearing sunlight, when necessary. Staff requests that the applicant engage the Commission on this matter at the workshop. Revisions may be requested to address this issue if necessary. 10. What is the 'emergency vehicle access going to be on a year -round basis? Traffic on Betty Ford Way ,g currently being managed as a `one -way loop' from east to west. This route has been designed to accommodate emergency vehicles. Betty Ford Way is plowed in the winter from east to west. Analysis: Although Betty Ford Way will not be managed as a one way loop, emergency vehicular access will be available from either end of Betty Ford Way. Any improvements to the west end of Betty Ford Way, as proposed under Action Step 3.1.4, will continue to allow emergency vehicles on a year round basis. This issue requires no further action at this time. 11. What is the employee housing requirement for the new facility? What ratio will be applied by the Town? Nina Timm has calculated that the pay -in -lieu fee, based on current rates, would be $58,095 to $74,481 as mitigation for new employees, generated by the development of the Education Center. New Net Floor Area Proposed -BFAG Family Education Center Education 2,204.3 feet of net new floor area 2,204.3 feet x 1.2 employees /1,000 feet x 20% mitigation rate =0.53 new employees Professional Office 1,032.7 feet of new net floor area 1,032.7 feet x 3.2 employees /1,000 feet x 20% mitigation rate + 0.66 new employees Total employees to be provided employee housing= 1.19 employees Fee in Lieu of $74,481.00 per employee (2013 number *) $88,632.39 Town of Vail Page 7 *The actual fee in lieu will be determined at the time of building permit review and is subject to change. This issue requires no further action at this time. 12. What is the preferred ADA route for pedestrians? There are many routes available to the public with which to access the numerous amenities within Ford Park. The TOV has made its best efforts to construct these routes as ADA compliant. BFAG has no particular preference with regard to accessible routes currently available to pedestrians with special needs, but has observed that in the winter, the route from Manor Vail might be the best option. In the summer, the most direct and accessible route from the east parking lot would be the path at the top of the gardens, between the top of the gardens and the recreation field. Analysis: As the applicant has demonstrated, there are numerous possible routes for pedestrians within the park with some offering greater ease of access, some of which will be seasonally dependent. Please see earlier comments (Issue #7) concerning accessibility. Additional refinements to address this issue are necessary. 13. What is the frequency of FED EX and UPS deliveries to the facility? UPS and FedEx deliveries to the proposed BFAG Education facility will be Infrequent. The VRD has agreed to receive the delivery of US mail on behalf of the BFAG at the Tennis Center. UPS and FedEx currently deliver to the GRFA in the summer and must drive right past the proposed BFAG Education Center on the way out of the Park. Therefore, no additional trips are anticipated. Analysis: The applicant is incorrect in their assertion that delivery trucks (UPS /FEDEX) will be driving right past the proposed BFAGEC. All truck traffic with the exception of vehicles too massive (semi trucks) to maneuver shall enter and exit the Lower Bench via East Betty Ford Way. (Policy 3 under Objective 3.1) Staff recommends the applicant pursue an arrangement with the VRD to also accept deliveries from other carriers in addition USPS mail or develop alternative means of accepting deliveries without the need for vehicles to visit the BFAGEC. The use of a Drop Box at an appropriate location may be an option. Please refer to the Action Steps under Goal #3 in the Plan. Additional refinements to address this issue are necessary. 14. Will there be a drop off developed at the top of West Betty Ford Way? BFAG would be in favor of developing a new drop off for patrons of Ford Park at the top of west Betty Ford Way, near the frontage Road. However, the TOV Staff has advised that a drop off would not be feasible, due to restrictions Town of Vail Page 8 imposed by CDOT. Analysis: Staff concurs with the applicant that the development of a drop off at the northern terminus of West Betty Ford Way is not feasible at this time. This issue requires no further action at this time. 15. Will there be another bus stop developed at the top of West Betty Ford Way? BFAG would be in favor of developing a new bus stop of for patrons of Ford Park at the top of west Betty Ford Way, near the frontage Road. However, the TOV Staff has advised that a drop off would not be feasible, due to restrictions imposed by CDOT. Analysis: Staff concurs with the applicant that the development of a new bus stop at the northern terminus of West Betty Ford Way is not feasible at this time. This issue requires no further action at this time. 16. What is the function of the plaza near the front entrance? The proposed patio occurs within a sewer easement, containing utility systems that cannot be built over with permanent structures. The patio is intended to provide an informal seating area for guests of the proposed facility. Cafe -style seating may also be provided for patrons to enjoy soft drinks and other snacks, which may be available for purchase at the Education Center. An outdoor fire pit might also be provided as an amenity to support outdoor education programs during the winter months. Analysis: Please be advised that outdoor seating may affect occupancy. This issue requires no further action at this time. 17. What is the function of the plaza on the roof? The roof -top plaza is intended to provide additional space for informal gatherings, donor appreciation events, member programs as well as shelter for a wedding party during inclement weather. The roof -top plaza will be partially covered to provide much - needed shade during the summer months. Analysis: Please review earlier comments related to public safety and the proximity of the roof top deck to other existing park uses. Additional refinements to address this issue are necessary. 18. Can the public 'rent out' the facility? The facility could possibly be rented by others, but only at a time that would not conflict with any other programming for BFAG. Town of Vail Page 9 Analysis: Special events shall be coordinated through the TOV, and leaseholders, through the Park Calendar and Parking and Transit Management Plans. Building design will affect allowable occupancy. The building design, including restroom facilities, should be consistent with the anticipated uses and occupancy of the project. This issue requires no further action at this time. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends the Planning & Environmental Commission and members of the public engage in a dialogue with the representatives of the Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation about the proposed project. As this is only a worksession, the Commission is not being asked to take any formal action on the application at this time. VI. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Applicants Submittal including Photographs C. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Master Plan, without appendices. Town of Vail Page 10 rim J � W ry LU F— 1 f Q Z i V W z v -? W Z W aZ Z � Z Q� � N 0 Ell e Q J d) Z J U Q W N w API CL >- m ® ' Q = r) � u W Q � LJJ ry W N.2 am LL J V O — c) W *` 5 O so-ol W[q 33V 99LL-6Y (Wo 113N13N'130MNm Oi5B8�L WL6) 3 LW3'97:610L61 'YJI'Nll W 'map sa1oioosrp s "I'll, llr II lz I ", ,,, OdVNO IOJ �IIVA MUND Noiiv:)nU3 AlIVW3 SN3421NJ 3Nldlb' Q 'dOA X39 LU Z O Q Lu F w _U CL _ v) a � =d 3 O Q � LOL9 S96 (500) XVd UbBYE06 (500) 000 L-666(0 '—) CE61- (O'd 101E6 e!uiy!eJ'eiery¢g310L O[9L8 ope�o!oJ'uonV-9C61 •o0'O'd dl3 LOL EOE a1!�6 "MIOJ�a^�09e306 3 11H 3dY M 01N1-..NI ONI S3IVIJOHSSfV lldHNJV N 21 H E o W LU Lu O w ui _.�- a= S cn z ui _¢ a U) Zs ao z W Q o m a _ O z ¢ �. �- x du pia aaa�a¢aa.�w L °aaa ., —H ..... aaaah N..aa „has U � dad�adg o a><�s�.w Na a: >�.w� �_��_� as oo�ooaa �saLLad�s aLL�s as 6�LLLLd oa a O w F 3 U H ry cn Lu LU W a. W ................ 4 << ...... J W z w =Iz �W 'I m Q t = —aQ, WWL ®' ON ry U w zww a r 4 a 0 ... .: M. tt i u, uu. uu o u0000uuoo uu�wwwwuwwwuu ww'ww W omae 3 3 w a O O a ¢ = r x 5 O LL w ti w 3 w r w 0 0 r 0 O LL O F O O r 0 O r a w x r O w w F O O r i O r m a w u� 0 U r ti w x O 3 Ong -oz OL6) ON 99LL-6 (Wo 113NBN 9130INM lygroNlw Oi54L WLO LO09'9Z O6 ']NI'N � LO19E96(SOU) 0- 96(09) O160Q —606 LW —0 Op —13 IOl EOE i!.S °WI93aaJianea94¢396 3Mf1ll311HJMtl 3dYJ9ONtl1 SM00131NI -'JNINNVId-3Hf1JJ3LIHJNV 'JNI 'S3IVIJOSSV dNV N 321 H 3Z 'map sa1o111111 s "I'll, llr II Iz I vl, ,,, O4VNOIOJ 'IIVA MUND Noiiv:)na3 AlIVW3 SNRINVO 3NIdIV 42103 A1L39 � O T Z = a x "' w V) C = d cV 3 O2 a� � � � , � �" ; _ < r x 5 O LL w ti w 3 w r w 0 0 r 0 O LL O F O O r 0 O r a w x r O w w F O O r i O r m a w u� 0 U r ti w x O 3 , — a 0 l o / —❑ w = z � I — — II ==0:111111 I 111111 IIIIIIII I o VIII -1111 II II � , 0 - — _ I f_+ r O r= O_ ------------------- o Lx 4L, I, a9 ❑ ❑ ., ❑ ❑ — All — V i oi564zous) 73V 99LL-He Wa 113NBN 03OMNOW �LOO99Z6 veil e111PIll I.p ,,,- " u(£uul, Z C OZ53'97L OOL6) 03V MKW ']NI'N luo OQVb0�0�elIVA W Q MUND Noiiv:)na3 AIIwvA ; LU i018-E96 (5001 XVd bbBYE96 (509) OBb I-666(0L6)J(tl3 LSLb-666 (0L6) 101E6e!uiy!!eJ'eiegiegques 0[9le opeLOloJ'906V-9L6l xog'O'd —Od 13 101 SN3(1NV9 3NIdIV §� z_ o U ri <2 3-311— —NI Q O s r 2 U —..NI- 3HNJ3LIHJNV 'JNI 'S3IVIJOSSV N 321 HZ 4��3 X39 o i _ < GNV 4 LL , — a 0 l o / —❑ w = z � I — — II ==0:111111 I 111111 IIIIIIII I o VIII -1111 II II � , 0 - — _ I f_+ r O r= O_ ------------------- o Lx 4L, I, a9 ❑ ❑ ., ❑ ❑ — All — V i e3 One-oz WL6) ]31' 99LL-6Y6 WL61 113M3N @ 30SNOW 1 lygrozwfw OznsmzW a L009-K6 (WO 7NI'NIX~LL" � 'map sa1o111111 s "I'll, llr II Iz I vl, ,,, OdVNOIOJ 'IIVA MUND Noiiv:) U3 AIIWV3 SN3a21NJ 3Nldlb' aldo3 Ail39 J Z J ; -s -a a o- o; LLI 4 � �y One-oz OLq ]3V 99LL-H610L61 113M3N @ 30SNOW 'map sa1o111111 s "I'll, llr II Iz I vl, ,,, C lygrozwfw Oi5B9�L WL6) L009'9Z6(0L61 7N(Yd JVO O4VNOIOJ �IIVn MUND Noiiv:) 1U3 AlIWV3 SN3a21NJ 3NIdlb' aldo3 Ail39 Z i a 11 O '! a = o u M� o �� LO L9-E96(600 M 0609496(600) OBOI-66610L6)Xtld L6L0-666 (OL6) LO KE - pry11QYeL", L6 OPWO!oJ— V- 9L61x00'dd d13 LOL EOE a1!�6"MIO �F +J �a^�99e3 @b 3- 311- 3dtlJ6ONtl1 $NOM3IN I-JNINVdNn—NJNV 'JNI 'SIIVIJOSSV dNV 2 g j S ry o U o _ < -s -a a o- o; LLI 4 � �y z O F w w � s O z C C C z O F w O� mm �J F W – –_ Lu O Ily Lu z O F w w F 3 rn � m OzsmL(OLg 33V Bue"(OL6) TEMMN V 3OHNOW W87u" 025@9t (Oq 33V 1009-926 WO ']NI'NLLiVMLLW l'N°ZW IFAU "��a- �n ;,. >��Tp -a, �,.�^p�z �?a(G�€s �Y ^)•; �^� OOVHOIOJ'IIVA HUND NOIlyJn(i3 AIIWt/3 SN3421t/J 3Nldld a�O� � u 38 a GGG N Z O O L.LJ 1 LLJ x J w LU n 2 s 6 �� (V 02 t i ZO I$£96 ISM) Wd 06O 9 9d6l3(9l0O9l ) EOOiEOOl-N6ot6 6"(0PL^I69)�WlavJ JLiSanea696(0'L6') IOJE6 ewoJo9ew6 OL919 opwolOD- IV-916117e0B1 3NfIL73LHJNtl 3dVJ6ONtl1 SNOINUNI- JNINNVId- mn—I1HJNV ON 'S3IVIJOSSV ONV N 321 H IZ 2 U ; B < z O F w w � s O z C C C z O F w O� mm �J F W – –_ Lu O Ily Lu z O F w w F 3 rn � m zx IM ti - Z a� ry �aLL mmo za mLLm ^a� m PLL _ 1 1 • 0 0 o 1 1 i1 s p 0 i 1 n� r 1 A i �o a 1 �I l 7 zg. iod � ��- �)�` '•� fy '� /gyp / i 60 i" I � 07Sa-8w(OL6) J3V 99LL- 666(OL6) 113M3N'830NNOW "2'� °O °ss9��a�kaZ R46ZOZ ®FHB! J IVJINJ D313 1"nj.Dn 19 'JNI�NIINMNI OQVIOIOO '11VA OZS"tL(OL6) Dw L009-W6(OL6) IY INVHMW 1W] ' U N31N3J NOIlVJf143 AlIWV3 z Z ma-mm"A LM-6 WQ WlE64uallln'tleryes3 OMa1 ' 9 x 9 nwnWL MM"PJre'VrV-9.L6L>ba t ' Q 0 v t 1- 1NNV 'S31VIOOSSV N321 H3Z SN34NVJ 3NIdlV GNOA A_ l9 1@ LU g ONI ONV I to U a F zx IM ti - Z a� ry �aLL mmo za mLLm ^a� m PLL _ 1 1 • 0 0 o 1 1 i1 s p 0 i 1 n� r 1 A i �o a 1 �I l 7 zg. iod � ��- �)�` '•� fy '� /gyp / i 60 i" I � } W Y z W U W W IL U D z J 7�� � ,��. a -,- ♦ o► o� 1 1 1 1 1 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • Y; r� OzsmzoOL9 ]3V 99"- 6/6(0[61 mvaN R30MNO1V 'map sa�oioosrp sua.u�a�,vr alJZrn vex, i.�;m� �IIVA LU I OL998�L NL6) L009'9Z610LW ']NI'Nl O(7VNOIOJ d luo I1 1131ND NO on03 AlMM3 � � -= O ¢ 0 0 I019-E96(609)M %-96(609) OMOI-66610L6)XVd L9I0-666 (OL6) LOLE6 clulolle] el=9re9 �K O010 OP— J�J— V-9L61> 0'0'd OM�d 13101 SNRINVJ 3NIdIV V N o a u r 2 �F E a ¢ z ¢ 9MOM- 1-'JNINNV1d,3Nf13 UIHJNV 'S3IVIJOSSV N 321 H Z_. 42103 J11139 ¢ o b 'JNI dNV z� J s o } W Y z W U W W IL U D z J 7�� � ,��. a -,- ♦ o► o� 1 1 1 1 1 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • Y; r� ♦ i i z a a U w. [] v El AQ -= O 0 0 t9 w o ♦ �F wn o v,. z� ♦ i i z a a U w. [] v El AQ N, ♦ t ♦ i t U z �♦ H J W 2 Uin i N J OU 2 2 5° J H O H W LL U' N Q M > O U w F N z 2 in w O a O U H z a N O a O aLL J N ~ N ozsmz (OL9 My 99"- 6/610[61 113M3N R 30MNOW 'map sa1o111111 s "I'll, llr II Iz I vl, ,,, C b 1 lygro3nw 0L998r "00"6) �V Aog- w610"W '3NI'NIIMVWMIIMVW 1' _ O(7VNOIOJ TVA 1131ND NOI1 on03 AIIWVA SN3421t/J 3Nldld db�� X39 � w Q IL \ / O V) U € J� —9-06 NOW M %-96(609) OMOI-66610L6)Xtld L6L0-666 (OL6) 1O166 919 OP—J —V- 9L61�0'o'a OM�a1!.S, MI6 �+J� 9 9e3 Ob d 13101 — 3- 311- 3dVJ6ONV1 MM- 1-'JNIN --3 of UIHJNV 'JNI 'SIIVIJOSSV (7NV N 321 H 3 Z 8 a OJ ^ s o, Q _. N, ♦ t ♦ i t U z �♦ H J W 2 Uin i N J OU 2 2 5° J H O H W LL U' N Q M > O U w F N z 2 in w O a O U H z a N O a O aLL J N ~ N (mil M i i i i H W LL U N J Z O 2 to _(Yrn r F r >i N Q W LL x Q W H N J H J _ - - - - -- N W W — _ — - OJ ' 0 W O N LL 11 O z w a~ = W Z m' - a J Q in a a °� a 0 W a(LLi9a�x 1 , > O Oyo K 1 I o U 1Na W 3: ' 1 W 1 � 1 , 1 1 ♦� me (mil M i i i i H W LL U N J Z O 2 to _(Yrn r F r >i N Q W LL x Q W H N J H 51 - 106111.08 -6 -Dt" OQ V doloD 1iNn OD II✓ V H Zp V flog ITVA dO K/"Ol :m'BuiAanans 2Id. NaD fqOIdljl -lQd - NgcTlIvD gKTd -1v Q2IOd Ali gs aBuea ajog JVW JIHdV'dgOdOl / / r I PI 1 1 1 1 1 I � a 1 1 ( i a - o� - " " i i /gC r 1 jw i oN eor —90 die- z�b- eoON�N ° JS Js SIOZ /9 /S " �S Ae n�mvaa a - o� - " " i i /gC r 1 jw i I1u I blOZ /S/9 slx AHd umss3S AmM J'3d - m Bold 43 uoue3npg 6090P 3u Sdoj „asnol{ auldly„ pun —!ffo olul smaln gllm fOW Paluan JOW puo sllom sso16 po'a—dxa waglnos alglssa33o ypy alglssa33o ypy swoop oml olul papinlpgns aq uo3 u3g37!4 6uua7o3 puo wool 4oa3q so san3as Asap luo3( doM P3nj dllag lsaM w03jalglsln w3ojjow ddo- Sluaww0:) Is S'£8T Is 666Z :1y101 (3Nya'J 13N (:lyl 01985 SSON5) is 88 (:1y101ens SS089) ('3Ia'sllem Joua;ui pue JoiJa;xa Jo;) Is ST : (% 0 Z) N 3 1 l d I l l n W is Z'9b = b'8 X S'S SSON5 Ol 13N (a8elool aaenbs lau) ;s s : l y l O1 9 n S 13N a3owa7 loo»ol ab-ols lw—b IS 0'£L = £'L x 0'01 P84S 83 -OIS 6'SZ x 017 Nyld 80013 13A31 DOOM JIly VJ3HJS „asnol{ auldly„ pun —!ffo olul smaln gllm fOW Paluan JOW puo sllom sso16 po'a—dxa waglnos alglssa33o ypy alglssa33o ypy swoop oml olul papinlpgns aq uo3 u3g37!4 6uua7o3 puo wool 4oa3q so san3as Asap luo3( doM P3nj dllag lsaM w03jalglsln w3ojjow ddo- Sluaww0:) Is S'£8T is 09Z'£ 831}}0 VOI38AIQ (:lyl 01985 SSON5) ('3Ia'sllem Joiaalui pue aoiJalxa Jo;) Is 6b£ IS Z'9b : (% Z T) N 3 1 l d I l l n W wooilsay,suawom is Z'9b = b'8 X S'S SS085 Ol 13N (a8eloo; aaenbs lau) Is 116'Z asodind- IlInIN /Aeldsl0 : l y 101 9 n S 13N Jop!,,o, A-yd Is 9'£OT = 6'SZ x 017 uollelnaal3 oajo doldnp gbnojgl ssol6 g4iq' —!ffo uado is 9'ZS8 = Z'6Z x Z'6Z a3edS AaalunlOA ;asap lo3luog3aw IS S'Zb = S'8 X 0'S lasol:)pavy -!ffo A-puo— is S'S1T 0'11 X S'OT a31i40 „asnol{ auldly„ pun —!ffo olul smaln gllm fOW Paluan JOW puo sllom sso16 po'a—dxa waglnos alglssa33o ypy alglssa33o ypy swoop oml olul papinlpgns aq uo3 u3g37!4 6uua7o3 puo wool 4oa3q so san3as Asap luo3( doM P3nj dllag lsaM w03jalglsln w3ojjow ddo- Sluaww0:) Is S'£8T = 6'£1 X Z'£T 831}}0 VOI38AIQ is 9'195 = 0'9£ x 9'ST „asnOH auldltl„ IS Z'9b = b'8 X S'S wooilsay,suawom is Z'9b = b'8 X S'S wooilsay suavy Is O'b18 = O'ZZ x 0'L£ asodind- IlInIN /Aeldsl0 Is O'OL = O'OT x 0'L u84371N Is 9'6£ = 9'9 0'9 uollda3ay is SS£ = S'9 x S'S easyAalu3 Nyld 80013 13A31 NIyW JIlyW3HJS easy (u) (u) aweN woo8 41da0 4lp!m woo8 bTOZ'43S aunt wEJSOad Sulplln8 3llewa43S 1131N3:) Noiiv :) n G3 AIIINy3 SN3ONVD 3NIdIV ONO3 A1139 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan An Element of the Vail Comprehensive Plan A" .,_..1 .1 . ....... . . Oiw November, 2013 lly^k Resolution No. 14, Series 2013 wbhm.- -4; WWI RESOLUTION NO. 14 Series of 2013 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2013 GERALD R. FORD PARK MASTER PLAN, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, on April 16, 2013, the Vail Town Council instructed Town Staff to prepare a new master plan for Gerald R. Ford Park; WHEREAS, the new master plan was to be a compilation of previous planning efforts for the Park and the articulation of recommendations for new improvements with the Park; WHEREAS, the new master plan is intended to be an element of the Vail Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, the new master plan is intended to have a ten year life span with periodic updates and amendments when needed; WHEREAS, the primary purposes of the new master plan are to protect the Park from over development, to define expectations for the use of the Park, and to assist in decision - making regarding capital improvements and other changes proposed in the Park; WHEREAS, the new master plan was prepared in collaboration with the Vail Recreation District, Vail Valley Foundation, Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, Vail Economic Advisory Council, Art in Public Places Board, Planning & Environmental Commission and many other interested citizens from the Vail community; WHEREAS, on July 22, August 12, and August 26, and September 9, 2013, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission held public hearings on an application to adopt a new master plan for Ford Park; WHEREAS, on October 28, 2013, the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval, with modifications, of the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan amendments to the Vail Town Council; WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds and determines that the new master plan recommendations are consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town; and, WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds and determines that the new master plan promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves Resolution No. 14, Series of 2013 and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: SECTION 1. The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan is hereby adopted as depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Vail Town Council of the Town of Vail held this 19th day of November, 2013 ATTEST: Andrew P. D yo CA-, Tamm N el, Actin wn Clerk Q"a ©F'V•. �ol_oR� Resolution No. 14, Series of 2013 2 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Prepared for: The Town of Vail Prepared by: Town of Vail Department of Community Development ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Vail Town Council Andy Daly, Mayor Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Pro -tem Jenn Bruno Dale Bugby Dave Chapin Greg Moffet Margaret Rogers Former Vail Town Council Kerry Donovan Kevin Foley Susie Tjossem Vail Recreation District Vail Valley Foundation Art in Public Places Betty Ford Alpine Gardens and Braun Associates, Inc. Vail Planning and Environmental Commission Bill Pierce, Chair Henry Pratt, Co -Chair Susan Bird Luke Cartin Pam Hopkins Michael Kurz John Rediker TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Site Assess ment/Existing Conditions 6 3. History of the Park and Previous Planning Efforts 10 4. Goals, Objectives, Policies and Action Steps 19 5. Ford Park Sub -Areas 36 6. Illustrative Plan 54 7. Park Management 62 8. Appendix 64 Due to the volume of material, the information listed below is provided in a separate document, the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix. • Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973, authorizing the purchase (by condemnation) of the property known as the Antholz Ranch. • The Vail Plan, 1974 • Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, naming the property commonly known as the Antholz Ranch to Gerald R. Ford Park. • The Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final Report, 1985 • Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, designating the seven acres around the Nature Center as an area to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history. • Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988, amending the 1985 Master Plan to add four tennis courts and to change the location of the aquatics center. • Ford Park Management Plan, 1997 • Ford Park Management Plan Update, 2012 • BFAG Building — Site Evaluation Matrix, 2013 • Betty Ford Alpine Gardens — WBFW Site Evaluation, Martin /Martin, August 15, 2013 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan November 2013 "Whereas, President Gerald R. Ford has brought to the Town of Vail his interest and encouragement; has shown through his private life and public life a commitment to recreation, the environment and places set aside therefor; and believes that a statement of the community's appreciation and respect for Gerald R. Ford is appropriate and called for; that the property commonly referred to as the Antholz Ranch is hereby named the Gerald R. Ford Park." Resolution approved by Vail Town Council, January 18, 1977 Chapter 1 - INTRODUCTION The Town of Vail acquired the 38 acre Anholtz Ranch in 1973 for the stated purpose of "creating a major recreation facility for the total town" (The Vail Plan, 1974). Since that time the property has increased in size to more than 47 acres and has evolved into one of Vail's most widely used and highly cherished assets. The evolution of the Antholz Ranch to what has become Ford Park was originally contemplated by one of Vail's earliest planning efforts: "The intended use program is a comprehensive one and eventually the park will include an impressive number of facilities in addition to extensive open tun` space and the delight of the natural earth forms and mature tree growth adjacent to Gore Creek." The Vail Plan, 1974 The goal of the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan (the Plan) is to maintain the essence of what Ford Park (the Park) is today and what was envisioned for the Park in 1974 — a combination of natural open space along the Gore Creek corridor coupled with recreational, social and cultural uses and facilities to serve the needs of residents and guests of Vail. The primary purposes of this Plan are to protect the Park from over development, to define expectations for the use of the Park, and to assist the Town in decision - making regarding capital improvements and other changes proposed to the Park. Only those changes deemed to be in compliance with applicable elements of this Plan will obtain approvals from the Town. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 1 The Town has completed four planning efforts for the Park. These plans have directly influenced the development of Ford Park and each has contributed to the role the Park plays in the community. These previous planning efforts were: 1974 Vail Plan — While the primary purpose of this plan was to address Vail's growth and development, it did include a chapter on recreation and defined at a very broad level the role Ford Park could play in providing recreational, cultural and community- oriented uses. 1985 Gerald R. Ford Park /Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final Report — At the time this plan was prepared; ballfields, tennis courts, and parking had already been developed and construction of an amphitheater had commenced. The purpose of this plan was to "guide the future development of the park and establish guidelines for the implementation of improvements" (1985 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan). 1997 Ford Park Management Plan — This plan was initiated in response to several development proposals for the Park. The plan was a product of extensive focus group and public input sessions and in essence served as an amendment to the 1985 plan. 2012 Update to the Ford Park Management Plan — This plan was done to acknowledge improvements proposed for the Park that were initiated when Vail voters approved re- allocating a portion of the Convention Center Funds to Ford Park. Summaries of these previous plans are found in Chapter 3. While the impetus for these planning efforts varied, each involved extensive community input, debate, and at times, controversy. These planning processes revealed the community's intense passion for the Park as town staff, elected officials and the public worked to find the appropriate levels of development and activity for the Park. The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan presents a compilation of these previous planning efforts along with new direction and ideas that have evolved from this latest planning effort. The primary objectives of this Plan are to: • Incorporate key elements of previously completed plans for Ford Park into one document, specifically those guiding principles that have successfully shaped the development of the Park from its inception, 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 2 • Establish clear expectations for the future use, development and management of the Park, • Protect the Park from over -use and over - development; • Define effective tools for decision - making regarding the future of the Park, and • Provide a single, comprehensive document to serve as the master plan for the Park. With the adoption of this Plan, previous plans for Ford Park will be archived and no longer used as guides for future decision - making or planning for the Park. The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan will serve as the Town's sole planning document for the Park. The development of Ford Park has evolved over a number of decades. While the majority of the Park is developed, and notwithstanding the most recent phase of improvements to the Park, there is no reason to think that the Park will not continue to evolve in the future. This Plan was prepared with the expectation that it will provide the community with a document to guide the use and development of the Park for the next ten years. That said, it is likely that during this time new ideas or issues not addressed by this Plan will arise, be they proposals for enhancements to existing facilities, the development of new facilities, or new uses for the Park. This is to be expected as the needs of the community will change over time and as they do changes to the Park may be appropriate. As dialogue and debate occur regarding any changes to the Park, it is critical that decisions made by the Town maintain the essence of what Ford Park is, why it was established, and how it provides environmental, recreational, educational, cultural or social benefits to the community. The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan was adopted by Resolution No. 14, Series 2013 by the Vail Town Council following recommendation from the Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. Future amendments to this Plan may be initiated by the Vail Town Council, the Planning and Environmental Commission, or members of the community. Any such amendment proposal shall be reviewed by the Vail Town Council following recommendation from the Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 3 Elements of this Plan This Plan includes the following chapters: 1. Introduction The section provides an introduction to the plan, the purpose of this planning effort and outlines the major elements of the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan. 2. Site Assessment and Existing Conditions This section explains how site and surrounding conditions influenced the initial planning and design of the Park. 3. History of the Park and Previous Planning Efforts The 1997 Plan has provided the basis for this history and background of the Park and the summaries of the four previous planning efforts that have taken place. Site plans of the Park produced during these planning efforts are to provide a history and context for how the Park has evolved over the years. 4. Goals, Objectives, Policies and Action Steps While the 1997 Plan provided a framework for this section, the goals, objectives, policies and actions steps have been refined to better express the current vision for the Park. 5. Ford Park Sub -Areas Seven sub -areas are used to describe specific areas of the Park, their unique features, the role they play in the Park, how they will be managed and provide recommendations for improvements that could occur in the future. 6. Illustrative Plan The 2013 Illustrative Plan is a refinement of the 2012 Illustrative Plan; it depicts existing improvements and at a general level describes improvements that may occur in the future. 7. Park Management This chapter provides a brief summary of the various management and operational aspects of the Park that are managed by the Town of Vail. 8. Appendix 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 4 Documents relative to the history of the Park and previous park planning efforts are provided in a separate document, the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 5 Chapter 2 - SITE ASSESSMENT /EXISTING CONDITIONS Located immediately east of Vail Village, the proximity of Ford Park to Vail Village and the convenient access it affords residents and guests is one of the Park's most significant attributes. This is no coincidence as the 1974 Vail Plan documented how the location of Ford Park was a key factor in it being purchased for a community park and in defining the initial vision for the Park to be a major center of cultural and recreational activity for the community. "all properties of significant size within the Town limits were researched and the recommendation made that the Anholtz property, adjacent to development at the east end of the Village, was the only site satisfying the recreational uses anticipated. Selection criteria included such factors as ease of walking distance from the Village, adequate space within a single parcel for large, meadow -like tun` areas, proximity to the Frontage Road for simple and direct access by autos or buses, natural beauty such as the Gore Creek provides, and directness of connection to major bicycle and pedestrian trails. " The Vail Plan, 1974 When purchased, the original Anholtz property was +/ -38 acres. Today, Ford Park is approximately 47.1 acres. The four areas of the Park and their acreages are depicted below: Main Park +1- 2W,$ Acres Sore Creekl7Vakure Canker +f- S&.^ Acres ` Snrw Field_ +A -.5.5 Auer Ford Park, 2013 In January of 1977, Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, was passed re- naming the Anholtz Ranch to the Gerald R. Ford Park. A copy of this resolution is included in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 6 Existing Conditions In the past forty years many improvements have been made to Ford Park. Foremost among these are athletic fields, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, a children's playground, the Vail Nature Center, the Vail Tennis Center and parking and transit facilities. Infrastructure necessary to serve the Park is largely in place and vehicle and pedestrian access to and within the Park has been established. With the exception of the Gore Creek Corridor, the majority of the Park has been improved with buildings, facilities or other related site improvements. Access and circulation is a key factor in how the Park functions. On -site parking is provided, but in keeping with the original concept for the Park the amount of parking is limited to +/ -200 spaces along the Frontage Road and +/ -65 spaces at the Soccer Field. Parking for major Park events is provided in the Town's parking structures. Access from these structures to the Park is provided by pedestrian corridors and the Town's transit system. Pedestrian access is provided via the Gore Creek Trail, a sidewalk along the South Frontage Road and by two bridges in the Golden Peak neighborhood. The Park's main transit stop is located on the South Frontage Road with additional stops on Vail Valley Drive. These stops are served by the in -town shuttle and by dedicated express bus service during special events. Site Characteristics and Park Desian Physical characteristics of the land and the relationship of the Park to surrounding uses and facilities influenced the earliest design concepts for the Park. Significant influences in the early design of the Park include the South Frontage Road (that establishes the north boundary of the Park), Gore Creek and adjoining wetland and riparian habitat (that run the entire length of the Park), site topography, vegetation and views. Topography of the main portion of the park between the Frontage Road and Gore Creek includes a prominent and well- defined grade change that creates an "upper bench" and "lower bench ". Over time this grade change, created in large part by grading from the construction of Interstate 70, became a point of demarcation for the predominantly active recreation uses on the Upper Bench and the cultural and passive recreation uses on the Lower Bench. Much of Ford Park was initially developed without the benefit of a detailed design or development plan. The 1974 Vail Plan did, however, set the stage for the future of the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 7 Park by defining a number of basic design parameters for how the Park could be developed. There are many examples of how these basic design parameters and existing site characteristics directly influenced the design and development of the Park. Parkina and Transit These facilities were located on flat terrain immediately adjacent to the South Frontage Road and on the perimeter of the Park. This location minimizes the impacts of vehicles on other areas of the Park. Athletic Fields Fields along the Frontage Road were located on what at that time was the Park's broadest expanse of relatively flat terrain. Not only did the fields "fit" on this portion of the Park, the flat terrain minimized the need for site grading and associated site disturbance. The fields also provide a buffer between highway noise and other quieter areas of the Park. The Amphitheater The Amphitheater essentially straddles the grade transition between the Upper and Lower Bench. This location allowed the Amphitheater to utilize sloping terrain to create terraced seating areas within the Amphitheater. This location also affords stunning views to the Gore Range. Nature Center The Nature Center is located within the relatively undeveloped Gore Creek Corridor. The natural character of the creek corridor provides a fitting location for the environmental education programs offered by the Nature Center. The 1985 Ford Park Master Plan spoke eloquently about the philosophy of good park design and the role site conditions and characteristics should play in the design process. "Compatibility of the park development within the environment is the most significant aspect of the master plan. The existing landscape is an integral part of each plan and not merely a backdrop against which the plans are staged. This is essentially necessary with parklands, for there we expect the landscape to be stable, pleasant and above all, functional. Accordingly, the planning and design process was founded on a sound understanding of the features and dynamics of the park site environment. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 8 Just as a tapestry is woven from many threads of different colors, textures and strengths, so the landscape is composed of a variety of components such as slopes, soils, plant communities and aquatic features. Each of these must be identified and described, but more than that, the role of each must be understood as a dynamic entity so that limitations and opportunities can be properly understood. This involves the translation of forms, such as slopes and soil type, into processes, such as runoff and soil leeching, and the definition of critical inter- relationships among them." 1985 Ford Park Master Plan Integrating improvements with the landscape in order to create a pleasant and functional park should be the goal of any park design. While developed without the benefit of a comprehensive, detailed design plan, the major elements of the Park have been located and designed in a manner that is very responsive to site conditions and other influences. Ford Park today reflects many elements of the original vision for the Park as outlined in the 1974 Vail Plan and as further defined by the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 9 Chapter 3 - HISTORY OF FORD PARK and PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS During the past forty years the Town of Vail has completed four major planning efforts for Ford Park. This chapter summarizes the purpose, process and outcome for each of these planning efforts and provides information on the history and development of Ford Park. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973 (a copy of which is included in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix), authorized the purchase (by condemnation) of the property known as the Antholz Ranch. At that time the 38 -acre park site represented the last remaining parcel of undeveloped land central to use by all residents and visitors of the Vail community. The ordinance listed a variety of possible uses for the property including the following: • for park and greenbelt purposes, • to preserve the natural and physical character of the area to be condemned, • for bicycle, equestrian and hiking trails, • for children's playground, • for performing arts and civic center, • for a ski lift and related facilities, • for picnic areas, • for recreational facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools, gymnasium, ice skating rink, • for theater and assembly halls, convention center, public schools, • for possible exchange or trade of condemned land, or a portion thereof, with other property which may exactly meet the needs of the town, and • to construct and maintain water works, transportation systems, and other public utilities relating to public health, safety, and welfare. The four major planning efforts for Ford Park include: The Vail Plan, 1974 The Vail Plan was completed in August of 1973 and adopted in 1974 (a copy of this plan is found in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix). In the early `70's Vail pressures from growth and development were radically changing the character of Vail and the primary purpose of the Vail Plan was to help the town respond to growth pressures with the goal of "creating a recreationally -based community of individuality, beauty and pleasure that can be unique in the United States" (The Vail Plan, 1974). The plan included a chapter on the Town's recreation system. The Antholz Ranch 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 10 property was mentioned as "the only site capable of satisfying the anticipated recreational needs of the community" (The Vail Plan, 1974). The Vail Plan's vision for the Antholz Ranch was to create a "major community park - cultural center." A wide range of potential uses for the park were identified: • a place for showing and creating art, crafts, etc., • an indoor theater and an 800 seat outdoor amphitheater, • meeting rooms and community workshops, • wide outdoor terraces and natural landscapes • indoor ice arena, • tennis and handball courts • children's play facilities and space for family activities, • headquarters for the Annual Vail Symposium and local television, • a possible location for an ecologium (nature center), and • a grammar school. As a balance to this extensive program of uses and facilities for the Park, the Vail Plan contemplated the preservation of the Gore Creek corridor as a passive, quiet place to enjoy the natural beauty of the site. The plan called for 200 surface parking spaces to meet the daily parking needs of the park. Parking for major events was planned to be provided in the Vail Transportation Center with town transit and various trails and bikeways providing alternative means to access the Park. The Vail Plan also depicted a potential road connection at the east end of the park that would link the Frontage Road with Vail Valley Drive. While the Vail Plan did not include a detailed design plan for the Park, the conceptual site plan provided a vision for how the Park could be developed. A number of existing park improvements reflect some of the basic concepts from the 1974 Plan. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 11 F, Conceptual Plan for Ford Park, Vail Plan, 1974 �r9 t Sic A MMICT s ' . - 41 fl�( Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan, 1985 In August of 1985 the Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final Report was adopted by the Vail Town Council (a copy of this plan and Resolution No. 19, Series of 1985 is found in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix). When the 1985 planning process was initiated, improvements in the Park were limited to athletic fields, tennis courts and parking. A foundation for an amphitheater was in place but this project was not yet completed. At that time the very eastern end of the Park along the Frontage Road was utilized as a snow -dump. The purpose of the 1985 plan was to prepare a more detailed plan for the future development of the park and to establish guidelines for the implementation of park improvements. The master planning process included a Recreation Needs Analysis Survey and extensive community input via workshops and community meetings. The outcome of these efforts was an indication of the type and extent of improvements the community wanted to see in the Park. Alternative site plans were considered and a final, preferred plan was selected. This final plan included a swimming pool complex, "neighborhood park improvements" (on the Lower Bench), a pond /skating rink (on the Lower Bench), and the realignment of the eastern softball field. Development of the neighborhood park improvements on the lower bench were completed in 1988 and 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 12 included restrooms, playground area, open turf area, picnic facilities, and the west access road. The first major structure to be constructed in the Park, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, was completed in July of 1987 and shortly thereafter a Parking and Transit Study for the Amphitheater was completed. This study made five recommendations: 1. the Village Structure should be considered the major parking facility for Ford Park (with improvements to the signs, sidewalks, and bus service being necessary); 2. extend shuttle bus service to the soccer field; 3. disallow Frontage Road parking; 4. construct a vehicle turn - around and passenger unloading area at Ford Park; and 5. do not schedule concurrent events in the Park. These recommendations validated many of the recommendations for parking and transit outlined in the 1974 Vail Plan. _ v `ff. r W f F ti..s f MATER PT-4 —N V; 4 I]} '6TF ,01'IVLENT ]MASTER PLAN Ford Park Master Plan, 1985 The 1985 Plan identified a location for an alpine garden and in 1989 the first phase of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens was completed. Since that time a number of expansions to the Gardens have been completed, including the Perennial Garden, the Meditation Garden, and the Alpine Rock Garden. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 13 Following approval of the 1985 Master Plan the following steps were taken regarding the planning of Ford Park: Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, was passed on November 3, 1987. This resolution designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an area to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history. Vehicular traffic was to be restricted and certain policies and procedures for preservation and maintenance of the grounds and facilities were established by the resolution. (a copy of resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, is included in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix). In December of 1988, the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District (Now the Vail Recreation District) and the Town of Vail, requested an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan. The two phase amendment was adopted by Council as Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988. A copy of the resolution is included in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix. Phase one of the amendment was to allow the construction of four additional tennis courts. Phase two of the amendment changed the proposed location of an aquatic facility to the eastern softball field. Funding of the aquatic facility was rejected by voters in a special election on February 6, 1989. Vail Town Council was presented with a petition to delete all reference to an aquatics center from the Ford Park Master Plan in April of 1990. No record of Council action on the petition was found. While the tennis center building is not mentioned in the Master plan amendment, the VRD did receive a Conditional Use Permit for the project on May 8, 1990. The Vail Village Master Plan, adopted in 1990, addresses Ford Park as a specific study area. This plan acknowledged the use of the Park to accommodate overflow skier and local parking needs. It recommended that the Park be studied further as a site for additional skier parking to serve expansion of the eastern side of Vail Mountain. Action Step #5 under Goal #5 states: Study the feasibility of an underground (recreation fields would remain) parking structure in Ford Park. The Parking and Circulation Plan (an element of the Vail Village Master Plan), identified the western portion of the upper bench for potential parking beneath the Park, and called for separated bike /pedestrian ways along the South Frontage Road and Vail Valley Drive. The Vail Transportation Master Plan, completed in 1993, states that the existing Ford Park Parking area (at the east end of the Park) should be considered for a possible 2 -level parking facility with the second level below existing grade. Ford 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 14 Park and the athletic field parking area are also listed as two possible sites for over -sized vehicles if the lot east of the Lionshead Structure becomes developed. Ford Park Management Plan, 1997 The planning process that resulted in the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan process was initiated in June of 1995 in response to several development proposals which had been formally and informally discussed for the Park. These development proposals included an Educational Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, a cultural /performing arts center, expansion of the tennis facility, athletic field fencing, and a community parking structure. This planning process was also seen as a means for addressing park management issues such as parking deficiencies, Frontage Road access, pedestrian access and circulation, access for the elderly and mobility impaired, utilization of the lower bench, conflicts between uses within the Park, conflicts with adjacent property owners, and the delineation of financial responsibilities. At the time the project was authorized the Vail Town Council expressed concern that a new master plan for Ford Park could result in an excessive amount of new development. In response, staff noted the intention of the project was to create a management plan as a means to adequately and consistently evaluate development proposals, with the goal of limiting development and protecting the character of the Park. Park leaseholders, two neighborhood representatives and town staff served as the Stakeholder Group for the planning process and a third party facilitator was retained to coordinate this effort. The Stakeholder Group developed alternative design solutions addressing parking, vehicular access, Frontage Road improvements, additional sports facilities and management policies. These plans were presented to the public in an open house at the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater in June of 1996. The open house presentation was a turning point in the process of developing the Management Plan. Several residents were alarmed by the alternatives included in the presentation and initiated a grass -roots movement to place a referendum on any future expansion /development within the Park. This strong public reaction, combined with a lack of closure within the Stakeholders Group, prompted the Vail Town Council to revise the process to include more community involvement. Three Focus Group meetings and public input sessions were held throughout the fall of 1996. The results of the focus groups and public input sessions and a preliminary master plan framework were presented to the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Vail Town Council in late 1996. Following these meetings staff was directed to proceed with 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 15 drafting the management plan as an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan based on the input received and presented. The management plan was adopted in April of 1997. Major elements of the plan were six goal statements along with objectives, policies and actions steps intended to define the future direction for the Park. The 1997 Plan also included an Illustrative Plan that identified a number of future improvements. Foremost among these was identifying a site next to the Soccer Field parking lot for an Educational Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. Following approval of the 1997 Management Plan the following related actions were taken regarding the planning of Ford Park: Goal #4 of the Vail Village Plan Master Plan (as amended in 1998) addressed the preservation of "existing open space areas and expansion of green space opportunities." An action step associated with this goal is to "explore the feasibility of expanding Ford Park to the west to Vail Valley Drive and /or Slifer Plaza along the Gore Creek stream tract to provide improved pedestrian and handicapped access to the Park." The 2009 Vail Transportation Master Plan identified a wide range of roadway improvements designed to accommodate traffic levels anticipated to meet 2025 demands. One of these improvements contemplates a roundabout at the west end of Ford Park to "serve as a means of "u- turning" (eastbound to westbound) and to potentially serve a future parking structure." 2012 Management Plan Update In 2012 the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan was updated to reflect numerous improvements proposed for the Park. Plans to improve the Park were initiated when Vail voters approved re- allocating a portion of the +/- $9,000,000 Convention Center Funds to Ford Park. The other stakeholders in the Park also participated in the funding of these improvements. The 2012 Update maintained the general direction for the Park as established by the 1997 Management Plan. With only a few exceptions, the 2012 Update suggested no significant changes to the uses, facilities and activities that currently take place in the Park. One exception was the 2012 Update included the development of an Education Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens along Gore Creek adjacent to the main entry to the Gardens. All of the existing major uses in the Park — athletic fields, passive recreation, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, the Alpine Gardens and Tennis Center were to remain in place. The Update did not change any of the six major goal 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 16 statements (or related objectives, policy statements and action steps) in the 1997 Management Plan. 011 m ice: 'zz:: r ' ..e f m.. M „ _ N. i11"Notwe pion 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Update sal. - - -- .a_coM o> z The most significant changes in the 2012 Update are found in the Illustrative Plan chapter of the Plan. The Illustrative Plan provided conceptual site plan diagrams and narrative explanations of improvements suggested for the Park. Many of these improvements were first identified in the 1997 Plan, others evolved out of discussions with the Vail Town Council, stakeholders and the community during the winter of 2012. Many of these improvements were initiated in 2012 and 2013. Foremost among them were the major re- modeling of the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater, re- construction of East Betty Ford Way, improvements to the parking and transit area, expansion and re- configuration of the athletic fields and new concession and storage buildings associated with the fields. A copy of the 2012 Management Plan Update is found in the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 17 Time Line of Ford Park Activities: April 1973 Condemnation of Anholtz Ranch, Ordinance 6, 1973 August 1973 Completion of Vail Plan January 1977 Anholtz Ranch named Gerald R. Ford Park, Resolution 1, 1977 August 1985 Completion of Ford /Donovan Park Master Plan, July 1987 Amphitheater construction completed August 1987 Alpine Demonstration Garden completed November 1987 Preservation of Nature Center, Resolution 27, 1987 December 1987 Vail Valley Foundation lease signed November 1988 Lower Bench improvements completed December 1988 Ford Park Master Plan amendment by VRD, Resolution 44, 1988 December 1988 Service agreement with VRD, Resolution 46, 1988 May 1989 Tennis Center receives Conditional Use Permit July 1989 Alpine Perennial Garden completed January 1990 Completion of Vail Village Master Plan February 1990 Aquatic Center rejected by voters in special election April 1990 Council petitioned to delete Aquatic Center from Master Plan May 1990 Tennis Center construction completed June 1991 Alpine Meditation Garden completed April 1993 Completion of Vail Transportation Master Plan December 1993 Vail Recreation District agreement renewed June 1994 Vail Alpine Garden Foundation license agreement signed. June 1995 Town begins Ford Park Management Plan October 1996 Council allows Betty Ford Alpine Gardens to proceed through process with Educational Center plans at Soccer Field parking lot April 1997 Ford Park Management Plan adopted 1999 Lease with Vail Valley Foundation renewed 2008 Lease with Vail Recreation District renewed 2009 Vail Transportation Plan Update completed November 2011 Voters approve use of Conference Center Funding for Ford Park Improvements May 2012 Completion of 2012 Update to Ford Park Management Plan 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 18 Chapter 4 - GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND ACTION STEPS This plan includes five statements that convey the community's goals for Ford Park. These goal statements provide broad direction on the preservation of the Park, how the Park should be used, vehicles, pedestrian circulation, coordination between park users and financial considerations relative to operations and capital improvements. Each goal statement includes a series of objectives, policies and action steps. Collectively these statements reflect input from the Vail Town Council, the community and leaseholders during the 2013 master plan update process. These statements will be used to provide guidance in decision - making on the management and use of the Park. The goals, objectives and policies of this Plan will be considered during the review process for any new development, changes or improvements proposed for the Park. Only those proposals deemed to be in compliance with these statements (and other applicable elements of this Plan) will gain approvals. Project proposals deemed to not comply with these statements and other applicable elements of this Plan will be denied. This chapter includes thirty -six action steps. In some cases action steps involve a single, defined task intended to implement an objective or policy statement. An example of this would be initiating refinements to the park design guidelines specific to Ford Park. Other action steps involve on -going tasks. An example would be the coordination and management of events in the Park. The Community Development Department, with participation from the Public Works Department, will prioritize action steps and present recommendations annually to the Planning and Environmental Commission regarding that year's work program for implementing action steps. The Planning and Environmental Commission will provide a recommendation on the work program that will be forwarded to the Vail Town Council who will make final decisions on the work program along with any necessary budget expenditures. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 19 Goal #1: Protect the natural environment along the Gore Creek corridor and ensure that any new use or building within the Park does not adversely affect the character and quality of the Park or the overall experience of park users. Objective 1.1: Limit uses and future development to that which is consistent with these goals, objectives and policies and is consistent with the Ford Park Sub -Areas and Illustrative Plan. Policy Statement 1: Maintain the variety of uses and facilities currently located within the Park. Policy Statement 2: Proposals for new (or changes to existing) facilities or uses that would displace existing public uses will not be permitted unless there is either a compelling public interest or adequate alternative facilities can be provided. Policy Statement 3: Uses other than those listed as "allowed uses" (below under Action Step 1.1.1) may be proposed, provided that such uses are not specifically listed as a "prohibited use ". Objective 1.1 Action Steps: Action Step 1.1.1: Draft a new ordinance to exclude those uses listed in Ordinance No.6, Series of 1973, now considered to be inappropriate, and to redefine the allowable uses within Ford Park. The following uses that are allowed and prohibited for Ford Park shall take precedence over Section 12 -9C -2 of the Vail Town Code concerning the General Use Zone District: Allowed Uses Park and greenbelt Bicycle and hiking trails Children's playground Active recreation Passive recreation Outdoor amphitheater Botanical gardens Educational centers Historical center 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 20 Picnic areas Recreation and athletic facilities Public utility easements Parking (surface parking /structured parking) Administrative offices for the operation of uses occurring within the Park Public Art Display Concerts and Special Events Venues Prohibited uses Ski lift and related facilities Civic center, convention /conference center, public schools, gymnasium, and assembly hall Equestrian trails Residential Dwelling Units Action Step 1.1.2: Town of Vail will review legal descriptions of existing lease areas in consultation with the Vail Recreation District, the Vail Valley Foundation and the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens and modify, as deemed necessary, so legal descriptions correspond with existing and proposed improvements and uses. Objective 1.2: Maintain all facilities and improvements in the Park at a high level of quality. Policy Statement 1: Any proposed development or change to Park facilities or uses shall conform to the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan, including but not limited to: • Goals, Objectives and Policy Statements, • Sub -Area Plans, and • Illustrative Plan. Policy Statement 2: Any new development or change to existing Park facilities shall be reviewed for compliance with Section 12 -11 -6 Park Design Guidelines of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, as well as other applicable Town regulations. Policy Statement 3: Any proposed development or change to Park facilities or uses shall provide a needed environmental, recreational, educational, cultural or social benefit to the community. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 21 Policy Statement 4: Maintain and operate existing facilities, uses and functions within the Park at a high standard of quality reflective of the Vail Brand. Policy Statement 5: Park leaseholders shall demonstrate the financial capability necessary to adequately operate and maintain any buildings and facilities located within the Park. Objective 1.2 Action Steps: Action Step 1.2.1: With participation of all Park stakeholders, Town staff to prepare standards which outline expectations regarding the appearance, maintenance, and operation of facilities within the Park. Action Step 1.2.2: Evaluate the park design guidelines in Section 12 -11 -6 of the Vail Town Code and modify as necessary to address design considerations specific to Ford Park. Action Step 1.2.3: In conjunction with the review of any new building or improvement, or in conjunction with any new lease or the renewal of an existing lease, Town staff will evaluate the adequacy of leaseholders financial capability to adequately maintain and operate facilities and buildings. Objective 1.3: Preserve and protect the environmentally sensitive areas along the Gore Creek Corridor. Policy Statement 1: Uses and improvements within the Gore Creek Corridor shall be limited to only those prescribed in the Gore Creek Preservation Sub- area. Policy Statement 2: No new buildings should be permitted within the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area. Policy Statement 3: Any new improvements within the Gore Creek Corridor shall consider the 100 -year floodplain and minimize impacts to wetland or riparian habitats. Objective 1.3 Action Steps: Action Step 1.3.1: Evaluate the merits of strengthening preservation controls within the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area via a conservation 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 22 easement or the Natural Area Preservation Zone District "Open Space" designation. Action Step 1.3.2: Inventory existing conditions of the creek bank and vegetation within the Gore Creek corridor, initiate programs to stabilize or restore these areas as may be necessary. Objective 1.4: Utilize Ford Park as a showcase for environmental sensitivity and sustainability. Policy Statement 1: Encourage all lease holders and events at the Park to implement comprehensive recycling programs. Policy Statement 2: Sustainable design and environmentally "friendly" materials and construction methods should be utilized on all new development within the Park. Policy Statement 3: Maintain, protect and enhance the environmental character of natural open space areas. Policy Statement 4: New improvements within the Park and the ongoing management of the Park should be done using sound environmentally sensitive practices. Objective 1.5: Limit the number and scale of buildings and structures within the Park to no more than necessary to meet the needs of park operations and to provide appropriate services and facilities to park users. Policy Statement 1: As an alternative to new buildings, encourage shared or joint -use buildings and /or facilities among Park lease- holders. Policy Statement 2: The design of new buildings or structures shall be integrated with the land with a subtle, understated, low- profile in appearance so as to not dominate the Park's landscape. Policy Statement 3: Park stakeholders may have administrative office space within the Park, provided that such space is limited in size to no more than what 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 23 is necessary only for the management and operation of facilities and uses located within the Park. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 24 Goal #2: Provide open space, facilities, and programs within Ford Park to meet the passive and active recreational, educational, social and cultural needs of residents and guests of Vail. Objective 2.1: Provide open space areas within the Park for the passive enjoyment of nature and to reinforce the Park's connection to the natural environment. Policy Statement 1: Preserve the "delight of the natural earth forms and mature tree growth adjacent to Gore Creek" (The Vail Plan, 1974) found within Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area and limit uses and activities within this area. Policy Statement 2: The primary use of the open turf area within the Commons Sub -Area should be to provide a place for un- programed and informal passive recreation. The use of this area for special events should be limited in frequency and scope in order to minimize impacts on the primary use of this area. Objective 2.1 Action Steps: Action Step 2.1.1: Establish management and operational policies for special events within the open turf area of the Commons Sub -area. Action Step 2.1.2: Identify key viewsheds from strategic locations within the Park and as may be necessary, establish designated view corridors to ensure the protection of these viewsheds. Objective 2.2: Utilize Ford Park to meet the community's needs for active recreation and formal team sport activities. Policy Statement 1: The Active Recreation and Soccer Field Sub -Areas shall be managed first and foremost to provide facilities for active recreation and team sports. Policy Statement 2: Landscape berms and buffers around active recreation areas should be maintained and enhanced to mitigate potential impacts of noise and activity on other sub -areas of the Park. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 25 Objective 2.3: Maintain, and enhance where appropriate, the role of the Park in providing facilities for the enjoyment and exploration of the arts, music, dance, education and other cultural pursuits. Policy Statement 1: Maintain the Ford Amphitheater as a principal summer -time performing arts facility in the Town of Vail. Policy Statement 2: Support the Art in Public Places Board in its efforts to continue public art programs (i.e. interactive events, projects, art installations, educational activities, etc.) within the Creekside area of the Commons Sub -area (and other areas of the Park as may be deemed appropriate). Policy Statement 3: Support the educational programs provided at the Nature Center and the programs provided by the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. Objective 2.3 Action Steps: Action Step 2.3.1: Work with the Vail Valley Foundation on their efforts to create a new "public plaza" at the entry to the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater. Action Step 2.3.2: Work with the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens on their proposal to create an educational and visitor center within the Park. Action Step 2.3.3: Promote and support the use of the Nature Center and surrounding area as a center for environmental education programs. Objective 2.4: Enhance the use of the Historic School House and preserve the historic character of the building. Policy Statement 1: Maintain public access to the School House and continue the utilization of the building in accordance with the terms of the lease with the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. Objective 2.4 Action Steps: Action Step 2.4.1: Evaluate alternative uses for the School House that will maintain public access and potentially involve the display of historic photos and artifacts or other activities in keeping with the historic nature of the building. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 26 Action Step 2.4.2: Complete an architectural assessment of the School House and establish a plan to protect and enhance the historic character of the building. Objective 2.5: Enhance and restore the Nature Center building and the landscape surrounding the building. Policy Statement 1: Limit vehicular access to only those vehicles necessary for the operation of the building and educational programs. Policy Statement 2: Uses proximate to the Nature Center should be limited and shall be consistent with the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -Area. Policy Statement 3: Restore the architectural and historical character of the Nature Center building. Objective 2.5 Action Steps: Action Step 2.5.1: Work with the Vail Recreation District to implement measures for controlling vehicular access to the Nature Center building. Action Step 2.5.2: Complete an architectural inventory of the Nature Center building to define steps that could be taken to restore the historic character of the building. Action Step 2.5.3: Eliminate the parking areas around the Nature Center building and reclaim these areas to a natural landscape condition. Action Step 2.5.4: Prepare a master plan and an operations /management plan for the Nature Center facilitv and surroundina area. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 27 Goal #3: Reduce vehicular intrusions into the interior of the Park and minimize to the greatest extent feasible the impact of vehicular activity on users of the Park, particularly on the passive use areas of the Lower Bench and along pedestrian walkways. Objective 3.1: Reduce the presence and frequency of vehicular trips into the Lower Bench (the Lower Commons, Gardens, Amphitheater and the Gore Creek Preservation Sub - Areas) of the Park. Policy Statement 1: Proposals for any new facility or use or the expansion of any existing facility or use in the Lower Bench shall not generate an unnecessary or appreciable increase in vehicular activity in the Lower Bench area of the Park. Policy Statement 2: Uses in the Lower Bench shall operate in a manner that limits vehicular traffic to the greatest extent possible. Vehicular access to the Lower Bench of the Park should be limited to: maintenance; delivery of goods or materials too large or too heavy to be carried by non - motorized means; use of golf carts or similar means to provide access for people with limited mobility; and emergency services. Policy Statement 3: Require all delivery vehicles to utilize East Betty Ford Way to enter and exit the Lower Bench. Due to difficulties in maneuvering, large trucks (semi's) shall access the Lower Bench via East Betty Ford Way and may exit via West Betty Ford Way. Policy Statement 4: Passenger vehicle access to the Alpine Gardens, the Amphitheater, AIPP programs or other uses in the Lower Bench shall not be permitted other than vehicles used to provide access for people with limited mobility or to deliver goods or materials too heavy to be carried by non - motorized means. Objective 3.1 Action Steps: Action Step 3.1.1: Establish a system (i.e. signage, control gates, electronic controls) for managing truck movements proximate to the Amphitheater loading dock and for coordinating truck use of East Betty Ford Way. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 28 Action Step 3.1.2: Coordinate delivery schedules to reduce the frequency of delivery and service vehicles into the Lower Bench during peak use time periods. Action Step 3.1.3: Require stakeholders to utilize on -site storage facilities to reduce and control the frequency of delivery and service vehicles into the Park. Action Step 3.1.4: Improve traffic gate operations and restrictions on both the east and west ends of Betty Ford Way to eliminate unnecessary and unauthorized vehicular intrusions into the Park. Consider closing the western access point of Betty Ford Way to all vehicles except trucks too large to utilize East Betty Ford Way (for exiting the Park). Objective 3.2: Utilize the Parking /Transit Sub -area as the primary means for satisfying the Park's parking and transit needs. Policy Statement 1: All stakeholders are required to adhere to the Parking and Transit Management Plan. Policy Statement 2: There shall be a "no -net loss" of the +/ -200 parking spaces within the Parking /Transit Sub -Area and the +/ -65 spaces at the Soccer Field Sub -area. Any net loss of parking spaces shall only be considered when off -set by a demonstrated improvement or enhancement of public transit use or alternate means of transportation to the Park. Policy Statement 3: Provide parking for daily park -use within the Parking /Transit Sub -Area and utilize the Vail Village Parking Structure to satisfy peak parking demands of the Park. Policy Statement 4: Maintain a central trash /dumpster /recycling facility within the Parking /Transit Sub -area and mandate all Park leaseholders use the central facility. Objective 3.2 Action Steps: Action Step 3.2.1: Town Staff, with coordination from Park stakeholders, shall prepare a Parking and Transit Management Plan, to include, but not be limited to the use and access of parking lots, fee structures, transit operations, etc. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 29 Action Step 3.2.2: As demand warrants, continue operation of the In -Town bus route beyond Golden Peak to provide service along Vail Valley Drive. Action Step 3.2.3: Implement an improved wayfinding sign program directing pedestrians from the Village Parking Structure and Slifer Square in Vail Village. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 30 Goal #4: Provide a safe, enjoyable and efficient pedestrian circulation system within Ford Park and between Ford Park and Vail Village. Objective 4.1: Provide clear and effective directional and informational signs to and within Ford Park. Objective 4.1 Action Steps: Action Step 4.1.1: Develop a comprehensive sign plan to direct Ford Park visitors from Vail Village and from each level of the Village Parking Structure to destinations within Ford Park. Objective 4.2: Encourage and promote park users to access the Park via pedestrian routes from Vail Village and the Vail Transportation Center. Policy Statement 1: The five existing pedestrian access points to the Park from Vail Village and Golden Peak should be maintained and enhanced to maximize their effectiveness in providing access to the Park. Policy Statement 1: Encourage leaseholders in Ford Park to utilize their marketing efforts to promote walking, biking and the use of Town buses as an alternative to driving to the Park. Objective 4.2 Action Steps: Action Step 4.2.1: Implement enhancements to the Gore Creek Trail that will improve safety, grading, surfacing, and lighting. Action Step 4.2.2: Evaluate opportunities for additional seating areas, public art and other features to enhance the walking experience along the Vail Village Connector (within the Gore Creek Sub -area) and where appropriate provide rest /sitting areas along all pedestrian routes to the Park. Action Step 4.2.3: Establish gateways or portals (signage, monuments, landscape elements, etc.) at the main entries to the Park (Frontage Road, Gore Creek Trail, Manor Vail, Slifer Plaza, Vail Valley Drive and the Parking /Transit Sub - area). 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 31 Objective 4.3: Improve internal pedestrian circulation within Ford Park. Policy Statement 1: New developments or other improvements in the Park shall not diminish the quality of the pedestrian circulation system and when appropriate shall include provisions to improve pedestrian circulation. Policy Statement 2: Existing ADA routes should be enhanced and where feasible new ADA access within the Park should be established. Objective 4.3 Action Steps: Action Step 4.3.1: Upgrade the portion of Betty Ford Way within the Commons Sub -area to create a high quality pedestrian corridor with improved surface materials, lighting, seating and landscaping. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 32 Goal #5: Maintain compatible relationships between all venues and all uses within Ford Park. Objective 5.1: Manage the carrying capacity of the Park by scheduling events to prevent overlapping or simultaneous events that exceed the availability of community parking or other park infrastructure. Policy Statement 1: The Town of Vail through its designee shall coordinate with leaseholders an annual schedule for events and uses at all Ford Park venues. Policy Statement 2: No one event or type of use will be allowed to dominate the usage of the Park. Policy Statement 3: The Park is a Town of Vail community facility and in the case of conflicting uses, functions that best serve the interests of the community will have the highest priority. In all cases, final decisions regarding the use of the Park shall rest with the Town of Vail. Policy Statement 4: The day -to -day management and coordination of activities in the Park will be assigned to the Town of Vail. The Town of Vail, through its designee, will coordinate as necessary with representation from the Vail Valley Foundation, the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens and the Vail Recreation District. Objective 5.1 Action Steps: Action Step 5.1.1: Expand the master schedule kept by the Town Clerk to include all venues within the Park. Action Step 5.1.2: Hold preseason event /activity coordination meetings with all affected stakeholders. Action Step 5.1.3: Hold semiannual (or as deemed necessary) coordination and input meetings with the Town of Vail, leaseholder representatives, and neighborhood and adjacent property owner representatives. Objective 5.2: Provide sufficient separation, berms and landscape buffers between facilities and uses. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 33 Policy Statement 1: The adequacy of berms and landscape buffers between different facilities and uses shall be considered when evaluating proposed changes to the Park. The type and extent of buffers to be provided shall be determined based on the nature of the use, the site design of the proposed facilities or uses, and the design parameters outlined in the Ford Park Sub -Areas and the Illustrative Plan. Policy Statement 2: Maintain and where necessary improve existing berms and landscaping between facilities and uses. Objective 5.2 Action Steps: Action Step 5.2.1: Enhance existing landscape buffers between tennis courts adjacent to the Active Recreation Sub -area and the Parking /Transit Sub -area and evaluate the need to enhance landscape buffers between other uses throughout the Park. Objective 5.3: Foster a spirit of cooperation between all leaseholders within the Park regarding their use of the Park and how to collectively use and manage the Park for the benefit of all. Policy Statement 1: Encourage the shared use of buildings and facilities. Policy Statement 2: Decisions regarding proposals for new buildings or improvements are to be made in the best interest of the Park and the Vail community, not just in the interest of the leaseholder. Objective 5.4: Establish a capital improvement plan for the Park and equitably share the costs of park management and operations with Park lease- holders. Policy Statement 1: All Ford Park leaseholders shall participate in cost sharing with the Town of Vail for common operating costs at a level proportionate to the leaseholders benefit from or relationship to said operation or management cost. (or as may be outlined in current lease or license agreement). Management and operations cost may include but are not limited to, electrical for pedestrian path and parking lot lighting, trash removal, and parking lot and pedestrian path maintenance costs. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 34 Objective 5.4 Action Steps: Action Step 5.4.1: Town staff to complete an inventory of existing park operations and associated costs, and in conjunction with park leaseholders, quantify the level of benefit realized by each leaseholder from such operations. Action Step 5.4.2: Research current lease, license and use agreements to determine existing financial responsibilities of each lease holder. Action Step 5.4.3: With input from the Vail Town Council, work with leaseholders to modify existing leases to correct any inequities in utility billing procedures and distribution systems, current utility use, and cost sharing relationships. Action Step 5.4.4: Create and maintain a five -year capital improvements program for Ford Park. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 35 Chapter 5 - FORD PARK SUB -AREAS "The basic structure of Ford Park is comprised of two broad terraces, or benches as locally referred to, which step down the north side of the Gore Creek and is typical of mountain, valley and stream physiography." 1985 Ford Park Master Plan Ford Park topography 11985 Early plans for Ford Park (the Vail Plan) anticipated recreation - oriented uses (and a number of buildings) on the Upper Bench with passive open space areas and an amphitheater on the Lower Bench. Initial development of the Park included athletic fields, tennis courts and parking facilities on the Upper Bench. Decisions on locating these uses on the Upper Bench were made based on the terrain (availability of flat land) and accessibility to the Frontage Road. Passive open space and the development of an amphitheater were initiated on the Lower Bench. These plans and the early development of the Park reinforced this Upper Bench /Lower Bench distinction. Over time the Upper Bench came to be regarded as recreation - oriented while the Lower Bench was regarded as being more oriented to cultural uses and passive open space. The characterization of athletic use on the Upper Bench and passive and cultural uses on the Lower Bench remains valid today, and the terms Upper Bench and Lower Bench provide a good, albeit generalized description of the Park. However, to discuss the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 36 future of Ford Park in terms of just the Upper and Lower Bench does not acknowledge the many subtleties and distinctions throughout the Park that need to be considered in this master planning process. It is for this reason that sub -areas are used to more clearly articulate the goals and objectives for specific areas of the Park. Sub -areas are intended to provide a forum for defining the unique areas of the Park, where improvements or changes may be acceptable and where improvements and changes may not be acceptable. The seven sub -areas described below were defined based primarily on the existing uses and site characteristics within the Park. In some cases, sub -areas define one single use. Examples of these include the Amphitheater and Alpine Gardens Sub - areas. In other cases sub -areas include a number of related uses. Examples of these are the Gore Creek Preservation and the Commons Sub - areas. In many cases the pedestrian corridors that link the sub -areas and facilitate the movement of people throughout the Park are used as boundaries between sub - areas. The sub -area boundaries were defined based on a variety of considerations. They should not be considered hard, inflexible parcel lines. It is reasonable to anticipate that when considering future improvements for the Park some latitude with the location of a sub -area boundary may be appropriate. Any consideration to modify a sub -area boundary shall be made in the context of the goals for the Park and for that particular sub -area. The use of sub -areas to better understand how the Park functions and to express how the Park may change in the future is not an attempt to divide the Park into parts. Rather, the sub -areas provide an effective means for discussing the unique areas of the Park in the context of the goals and objectives for the entire Park. With Ford Park the adage "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" clearly applies. The diagram below depicts the seven sub -areas defined for the Park. The narrative that follows addresses the following considerations for each sub -area: • Existing uses and facilities, • The role the sub -area plays in the overall context of the Park, • The relationship of the sub -area to adjoining sub - areas, • Improvements or changes that may be appropriate at some point in the future, • Any parameters or other limitations relevant to the future uses and activities within the sub -area, and • Any other considerations. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 37 Sub -area discussions address the Park at a fairly broad, master planning level. More specific discussion of potential future improvements that may be appropriate for the Park is found in the Illustrative Plan Chapter of this Plan. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 38 3 � / \ � � \ \[� j&� J, / �ƒ � � � � /� EE ~� / /�� 57 3 R 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 39 \ \[� ~� J, � � \ R 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 39 Parking /Transit Sub -area The Parking /Transit Sub -area provides on -site parking for the Park and includes a transit stop, a passenger car drop -off area and a central trash /storage facility. Strategically located along the South Frontage Road and on the periphery of other park facilities and uses, this sub -area plays a vital role in how the Park functions by separating parking and vehicles from other areas of the Park. The transit facility is a key component of the Park by facilitating direct bus service to the Town's parking structures (which provide parking for peak demand days). This parking /transit concept had its origins in the original planning of the Park. "This major community park- cultural center will contain parking for more than 200 cars and will also be served directly by the Town bus system. Major parking will be accommodated in the transportation center." Vail Plan, 1974 Since the mid -70's the parking plan for Ford Park has been to provide daily use parking at the Park with parking for special events provided at the Town's parking structures. This parking plan was validated by a parking and transportation study for the amphitheater completed in 1979. This parking plan remains valid today. Functional transit facilities along with pleasant, safe pedestrian corridors between the Park and the Village Parking Structure are key elements to ensure the on -going effectiveness of this parking plan. Prior to making improvements to the athletic fields in 2013 (to be completed in 2014) the Park had approximately 200 on -site parking spaces. The athletic field expansion displaced approximately 50 parking spaces at the west end of the parking lot. These 50 spaces were re- established by re- designing other portions of the parking lot, maintaining the approximately 200 on -site parking spaces. A "no net loss of parking" policy is in effect for the +/ -200 on -site parking in this sub- area. Any proposed reduction to existing on -site parking spaces will only be considered in conjunction with concurrent improvements to alternative means of transportation to the Park. An example of this would be reducing the number of parking spaces in order to improve transit facilities. The parking lot was designed such that it can continue to be used for concerts and other special events. The parking lot also serves as a turn - around area used to manage local traffic when eastbound 1 -70 is closed. It is anticipated that both of these uses will continue. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 40 :,r Future Improvements With parking lot and transit improvements scheduled to be completed in the fall of 2013 and spring of 2014, it is anticipated that the Parking /Transit Sub -area will adequately address the needs of the Park for the foreseeable future. Improvements that may be considered in the future include: • Design and installation of park entry features at the two pedestrian portals from the parking lot into the Park. • Installation of traffic control devices (gates or other means) at the east and west ends of Betty Ford Way. The potential improvements listed above are also described in the Illustrative Plan section of this Plan. The idea of constructing structured parking below the existing surface parking lot has been discussed in the past. This could accomplish two objectives — increase the supply of on -site parking (parking that could also address other town needs) and allow for some alternative use on top of the structured parking. On a related note is the idea of developing parking below the tennis center and re- constructing the tennis center on the surface of the structure. While structured parking in either of these locations could create opportunities for new uses on these areas of the Park, costs would be significant. Based on studies completed in 2009 -2010, the Town Council at that time determined structured parking to not be financially feasible. If or when this idea is discussed in the future, an initial step would be to evaluate implications on the goals for the Park and if necessary initiate amendments to this Plan. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 41 Active Recreation Sub -area This sub -area is the focal point of active recreation, team sports, tournaments and other special events. The location of these uses is consistent with some of the earliest design direction established for the Park. It is expected that these uses will continue in order to meet the community's needs for active recreation facilities. Significant plantings have created a landscape buffer between these active recreation uses and other surrounding uses. These buffers should be maintained and continually enhanced where necessary. Specific attention should be given to enhancing landscaping between the Frontage Road and the athletic fields. This improvement would provide a buffer between the Park and the road and also provide shade for spectators. Noise and other compatibility issues with use of the athletic fields and adjacent uses will need to continually be managed (refer to Goal 4 in Chapter 4 of this Plan). Future Improvements Improvements to the Active Recreation Sub -area initiated in 2012 (expected to be completed in 2014) were extensive and included expansion and re- organization of the athletic fields and construction of a new restroom /storage building and a new concession /restroom building. It is anticipated that these improvements will address the active recreation needs of the community for the foreseeable future. Potential improvements contemplated for this sub -area are: • Design and installation of park entry features at the west end of the Park along the Frontage Road and the two pedestrian portals from the parking lot. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 42 • Ongoing enhancement of the landscape buffer around the perimeter of the Sub- area. • The 2009 Town of Vail Transportation Plan contemplates a roundabout at the west end of Ford Park to "serve as a means of "u- turning" (eastbound to westbound) and to potentially provide access to a future below grade parking structure. No detailed design work on this improvement has been done, but conceptually this roundabout could be located just west of the athletic fields. The existing Tennis Center is located between the Parking /Transit Sub -area and other portions of the Park. East Betty Ford Way provides convenient and pleasant pedestrian access to the Lower Bench of the Park along the southern end of the Tennis Center. However, the tennis center presents constraints to establishing a convenient and graceful pedestrian entry between the parking /transit area and the rest of the Park. If or when the relocation of one or more tennis courts is considered, study should be given to how improved pedestrian flow and new uses could be established in this area. The Tennis Center building has been in existence for over 25 years and the design of the building is inconsistent with the architectural character of buildings recently constructed in the Park. If or when this building is to be re- developed, consideration should be given to a design more consistent with the design objectives for the Park. In addition to the design of the building, consideration should also be given to the use of the building and the potential for shared use to accommodate other Park users. The possibility of locating an education center for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens within Ford Park is discussed in the Alpine Gardens Sub -area. The preferred location for this building is along West Betty Ford Way. If the West Betty Ford Way site is subsequently determined to not be a viable location, the Tennis Center site is a suitable alternative. The potential site for this building is proximate to or integrated with the Tennis Center building. Coordination and cooperation from the VRD will be necessary if this site is to be pursued. Commons Sub -area The Commons Sub -area plays an important role in the Park by providing structure, or organization to the overall design of the Park. The area provides a transition zone between other uses in the Park and Betty Ford Way, which runs through the sub -area, and provides a delightful arrival experience for pedestrians entering the Park from the West. The Commons Sub -area also provides some of the Park's most important and popular facilities that collectively address a number of goals and objectives for the Park. Specifically, the Commons Area provides places for recreational use, public art, the 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 43 passive use and the quiet enjoyment of the Park. The sub -area also provides buffers between Park uses, a transition to the Gore Creek corridor and creates an important sense of openness within the Lower Bench. This sub -area should continue to be managed to provide the uses and park features listed above. There are no major changes contemplated to the three distinct, yet related uses that occur in this sub -area. These three uses are: Children's Playground The playground is an immensely popular area of the Park. This use should continue. While refinements and /or upgrading of play structures and facilities within the playground may be made in the future, the basic size or "footprint" of the playground should remain unchanged. The restrooms at the playground provide facilities for the entire Lower Bench and there is a need to upgrade these facilities in the near future in order to meet the demands of park users. No other buildings are contemplated in the playground area. Open Turf Area Aside from natural open space areas along Gore Creek, the open turf area is the only area of the Park that is not programmed with organized uses and activities. It is important that this area remains open and available for informal use by patrons of the Park in the future. The area provides space for picnics, rest, informal games and other passive recreation use. The open turf area also provides an important buffer, or transition from the more actively developed areas of the Park and the Gore Creek Corridor. Given this areas adjacency to Betty Ford Way, it is critical to limit vehicles in this area of the Park in order to prevent conflicts between park users and vehicles. The open turf area should not be reduced in size and no buildings or structures should be permitted in this area. If Betty Ford Way is improved, all streetscape improvements (lighting, landscaping, seating, etc.) should be located on the south side of the walkway so as to not reduce the size of the open turf area. In the past the southern end of the open turf area has been used for events (weddings, parties, etc.) that have involved the placement of temporary tents and other features within the open turf area. While these events may continue, the number and extent of such events should be limited and events that would monopolize the open turf area and prevent its use by other users of the Park should not be permitted. Any events in the open turf area should be managed in accordance with Park procedures, specifically to minimize the time temporary facilities are in place, minimize the number and extent of vehicles necessary to service the event, etc. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 44 Creekside Area ORM X1111 ■1 The Creekside area is a narrow strip of land south of Betty Ford Way and north of Gore Creek. A few small structures (i.e. the "art shack, an open air picnic shelter) are located in this area. Arts in Public Places (AIPP) may pursue remodeling or enhancing the art shack at some point in the future. AIPP has placed permanent art installations in this area and also runs summer art programs in this part of the Park. Art programs may include activities such as interactive events, educational and participatory activities, and temporary art installations. The passive use and the limited number of permanent improvements within this area make it an excellent transition to the more natural, undisturbed Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area. The use and character of this area should remain unchanged. No new buildings should be permitted. New art installations may be appropriate, but if pursued, they should be done in a way that minimizes impacts to other surrounding uses and facilities and is sensitive to the natural landscape. Future Improvements Improvements contemplated for this Sub -area include: • Upgrading restroom facilities at the children's playground. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 45 • Further enhance the buffer between the athletic fields and the children's playground. • Additional art installations within the Gore Creek Corridor. • Upgrade to Betty Ford Way to include, decorative pavers, seating areas, lighting and other streetscape improvements. The restroom and Betty Ford Way improvements are described in greater detail in the Illustrative Plan chapter. Amphitheater Sub -area An outdoor amphitheater was contemplated in original plans for Ford Park dating back to 1974. Completed in 1987, the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater has evolved into Vail's most prominent venue for music, dance and other cultural events. The facility is managed by the Vail Valley Foundation and is host to approximately 60 events each summer. The amphitheater is considered one of the community's most important cultural assets. In 2013 the Foundation completed an initial phase of improvements to the amphitheater. Improvements included re- contouring the lawn seating, new restrooms, expansion of concession areas, and other improvements. While not a project of the Foundation, the Town of Vail recently made major improvements (decorative pavers, widening, and reduction to grade of walkway) to East Betty Ford Way. The Foundation has plans for a second phase of improvements to the Amphitheater that would create a new "public plaza" at the entry to the Amphitheater. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 46 The relationship between the Amphitheater and the neighboring athletic fields will need to be continually monitored to ensure compatibility between these (and all) park users is maintained. It is important to protect and enhance areas of existing vegetation in and around the Amphitheater and where appropriate improve the physical buffers between these uses. The implementation of noise mitigation at the north end of the amphitheater to minimizing noise impacts from the athletic fields and Interstate 70 has also been discussed. The Foundation has completed acoustic studies of the amphitheater and concluded that mitigating noise impacts from the fields and Interstate 70 would have the unintended consequence of impacting sound quality within the amphitheater. As such, noise mitigation is not being pursued. The Amphitheater is a significant generator of people and also generates a significant amount of vehicular traffic into the Lower Bench. Vehicular traffic into the Lower Bench conflicts with a number of goals and objectives for the Park. It is important for the Town and the Vail Valley Foundation to continue to work together to minimize vehicular traffic to the Amphitheater. No new uses or expansion of existing uses at the Amphitheater that would generate appreciably more vehicular traffic into this area of the Park should be permitted. Managing and limiting vehicle traffic that may result from the proposed public plaza will be an important consideration in establishing operational standards for this new facility. Future Improvements Potential improvements contemplated for the Amphitheater Sub -area include: • Development of a "public plaza" at the entry to the Amphitheater. • Restoration of the stream bank adjacent to the Amphitheater south of Betty Ford Way and east of the pedestrian bridge. • Upgrading of the fence /screening of the utility installation along Gore Creek west of the pedestrian bridge. There are a number of important parameters to be considered in the design and development of the public plaza. These parameters are described in greater detail in the Illustrative Plan chapter of this Plan. Alpine Gardens Sub -area What began with completion of a demonstration garden in 1987 has evolved into a +/- 1.5 acre network of perennials, rock gardens and waterfalls hosting an array of high 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 47 alpine plants. The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens (BFAG) provides an important educational and experiential element of the Park. The gardens and the mission of the organization are in keeping with one of the original goals for Ford Park to provide environmental and educational facilities for the community. The Alpine Gardens have become one of Vail's most popular summer attractions. The Alpine Gardens has pursued the development of an "alpine education center" in the Park for a number of years. The 1997 Ford Park Management Plan identified the location for this facility to be within the Soccer Field Sub -area. During the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Update the BFAG proposed a location adjacent to Gore Creek for the education building and the 2012 Plan recommended this site for a new building. The Vail Town Council subsequently reconsidered this recommendation from the 2012 Update, and while expressing support for the BFAG to develop an educational building within the Park, initiated a new evaluation of site alternatives for the building. The Vail Town Council's primary criterion for selecting a site for the educational center building was that it not be located on the Lower Bench. Seven sites were evaluated, three of which were determined to be viable sites for the building. The BFAG Building Site Evaluation Matrix outlines the factors considered in this evaluation. A copy is found in the Supplemental Appendix. For a variety of reasons the preferred location for this building was determined to be adjacent to West Betty Ford Way just west of the Children's Playground. Located directly on the grade transition between the upper and lower bench, the Vail Town Council determined that this location conforms to their site selection criteria that the building not be located on the lower bench. The other two sites that were considered viable alternatives are at the Soccer Field and within the Tennis Center. These sites could still be considered if following further study it is determined that the Betty Ford Way site is not viable. The primary purpose of the building is to provide educational programs for the community and accordingly the uses within the building are expected to include rooms for interpretive displays, meeting /class rooms, a greenhouse and a limited amount of administrative space necessary to support on -site operations of the Gardens. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 48 Future Improvements Potential future improvements within the Alpine Gardens Sub -area include: • Development of an alpine gardens educational center. • Extension of gardens along the northeast entry in order to create a buffer from the adjoining athletic fields and improve pedestrian arrival to the Gardens. There are a number of important parameters to be considered in the design, development and operation of the educational center. These parameters are described in greater detail in the Illustrative Plan chapter of this Plan. Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area The Gore Creek Preservation Sub -area includes the entire length of the Gore Creek Corridor that passes through the Park. The sub -area is more than 21 acres in size and is generally defined by the park boundary on the south and the 100 -year flood plain, the 50 -foot Gore Creek setback and /or topographic features on the north. Gore Creek, 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 49 associated wetland and riparian habitat and stands of specimen trees are the primary features of the creek corridor. Existing improvements within this sub -area are limited to bridges, trails, utility improvements and the Nature Center. The Gore Creek corridor is the Park's most significant natural feature and provides the Park with delightful open space for the quiet enjoyment of nature. The corridor also provides a critical pedestrian link to Vail Village. The designation of this corridor as a preservation zone is in direct response to a number of goals and objectives from previous park planning efforts. The preservation of and enhancement to this area is also suggested by Goal #1 of this Plan. It is essential that adjacent uses respect the natural environment of this sub -area and that effective buffers be maintained between other more intensive uses within the Park. It is intended that existing uses and improvements within the Gore Creek Preservation Sub -Area be maintained and in keeping with the goals of preserving this area no new buildings are to be constructed within the sub -area. Any other new uses or improvements should be limited to those that will complement the natural character of the creek corridor and will minimize impacts to this sensitive environment. Resolution No. 27 of 1987 designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an area "to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history." The resolution stipulated that "vehicular traffic is to be restricted and certain policies and procedures for preservation and maintenance of the grounds and facilities" should be enacted. It is acknowledged that the Nature Center will bring a certain level of activity to this sub -area. Nature Center activity should be concentrated on the "upland" portions of the Nature Center in order to minimize impacts to the creek corridor. Improvements within the sub -area should be limited to low- impact improvements such as soft surface walking paths, creek enhancements to improve fish habitat, fishing access, re- vegetation and creek /stream bank restoration projects. In all cases such improvements should be designed and constructed in a manner that minimizes environmental impacts (i.e. avoid wetland habitat and wetland, maintain existing natural vegetation, use of "best management practices ", etc.). The underlying goal of any new trail development and /or bridge crossing should be to improve access in order to enhance awareness of this important natural environment. Utility improvements should not be located within this sub -area unless no other practical alternative is available. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 50 The Gore Creek corridor between the main portion of Ford Park and Slifer Square provides important pedestrian access to and from the Park and Vail Village (and the Vail Village Parking Structure). This corridor is heavily travelled and provides access to the Park for many park users. Enhancing the walking experience along the corridor will ensure its effectiveness as an alternative means of accessing the Park. rdervcalion i � • Fishing access to Gore Creek, while currently not an issue (i.e. excessive use from foot traffic resulting in damage to riparian areas and vegetation), could become an issue in the future. A creek access point was considered at the east end of the Nature Center (using the bus turnaround on Vail Valley Drive as an unloading area) was discussed during the 1997 Planning effort but was rejected as being contradictory to the intended use of the Nature Center. An Action Step suggested for this area (refer to Chapter 4 of this Plan) is to evaluate the benefits of establishing a conservation easement for this area or to apply the "Open Space" designation via the Natural Area Preservation Zone District. The protection afforded by either of these steps would define more permanent limitations on the use of this area and in doing so establish a degree of permanence in preserving this creek corridor. The existing condition of the Nature Center Building and the surrounding area has been a point of discussion. Potential improvements to the Nature Center are further discussion in Chapter 6 — Ford Park Illustrative Plan. Future Improvements Future improvements contemplated for this Sub -area include: • Enhancement and restoration of vegetation along the creek corridor, creek bank stabilization and fishing habitat enhancements. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 51 • Enhancements to the walkway between Vail Village and the Park to include improvements such as seating, art installations, etc. • Design and installation of park entry features at the three pedestrian portals to the Park along the Gore Creek Corridor. • Initiate steps to improve the physical condition of the Nature Center. These improvements are discussed in greater detail in the Illustrative Plan chapter. Soccer Field Sub -area The Soccer Field Sub -area, while often overlooked as an element of Ford Park, provides a valuable community asset. The full -sized athletic field serves the soccer and lacrosse communities, the sand volleyball courts are heavily used and the 65 -space parking lot is used year- around. A cul -de -sac at the east end of the sub -area allows in- town buses to turn around when providing express service to Ford Park. These uses should continue as they directly address the broad goals for the Park of "providing the recreational needs of the community" (1985 Plan) and is consistent with the objective of locating active recreation areas "away from the meadow and creek" (1985 Plan). Separated from the rest of Ford Park by Vail Valley Drive and physically removed from the more developed portions of the Park, the Soccer Field Sub -area does not have compatibility or relationship issues with surrounding uses or facilities. No major changes are contemplated to the existing recreational facilities in this sub -area. While no major improvements are anticipated in the near future, the Soccer Field sub- area is unique from the rest of the Park. For example, the uses and activities in this sub -area do not impact other areas of the Park, the sub -area has direct vehicular access that does not impact other park users, and the sub -area has no direct impact on the Gore Creek Corridor. For these reasons this sub -area could be a suitable location for new park uses or buildings to meet the future needs of the Park. If or when new uses may be proposed for this sub -area, consideration should be given to applicable elements of this Plan, how the proposed use could affect surrounding uses, private covenants and other considerations. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 52 Soccer / Field Future Improvements Potential future improvements within the Soccer Field Sub -Area include: • Expansion of the existing sand volleyball courts. • Expansion of landscape buffers. The possibility of locating an education center for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens within Ford Park is discussed in the Alpine Gardens Sub -area. The preferred location for this building is along West Betty Ford Way. If the West Betty Ford Way site is subsequently determined to not be a viable location, the Soccer Field site has been determined to be a viable alternative. The potential location for this building is at the northwest corner of the sub -area. Private covenant issues (with the neighboring Northwoods Condominiums and with the Vail Village Seventh Filing) will need to be addressed prior to constructing an education center on the soccer field site. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 53 Chapter 6 - FORD PARK ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN The Ford Park Illustrative Plan provides a general description of future improvements contemplated for Ford Park. The Plan indicates the general location of the improvements, a summary of the proposed improvements and parameters or criteria to be considered in the design, development and operation of the improvement. The design parameters and criteria are of particular importance as they establish specific expectations for the proposed improvement. Conformance with these parameters and criteria is a requisite to the Town approving any improvements in the Park. The 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan discusses a wide range of potential improvements for the Park. The design and development of some improvements are in progress. Other these improvements are only general ideas and will need further study and design, an example being the installation of art along the Gore Creek Corridor connection to Vail Village to enhance the walking experience. Other improvements are not viable in the near -term but could be viable at some point in the future, examples being structured parking under the athletic fields or a Frontage Road roundabout at the west end of the Park. It is not the intention of this Plan that only those improvements depicted on the Illustrative Plan may be proposed for the Park. Improvements not depicted on the Illustrative Plan may be proposed and will be reviewed relative to their conformance with the goals, objectives and policies for the Park and the applicable Ford Park Sub- areas. It should also be noted that improvements being depicted on the Illustrative Plan does not ensure if or when they will be implemented. Any improvement proposed for the Park is subject to approval by the Vail Town Council and further review by the Town's review boards prior to being implemented. This review may involve the Planning and Environmental Commission (Conditional Use Permit, Development Plan review) and the Design Review Board prior to being implemented. On the following page is the Ford Park Illustrative Plan and descriptions of future improvements that may be made to the Park. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 54 o �1 L �. G b r � 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 55 Improvement #1 — Gore Creek Corridor Restoration There are a number of areas within the Gore Creek corridor where erosion, over -use or other factors have disturbed or otherwise adversely impacted existing vegetation. A restoration program should be implemented to improve vegetation along the creek corridor. Restoration will improve the visual quality of this area and improve water quality by preventing erosion. A detailed assessment of the creek corridor is necessary in order to determine precisely where and to what extent restoration is needed. Following completion of this assessment, a detailed landscape plan for the restoration of the corridor should be prepared and implemented. A parallel effort should be to evaluate the condition of the creek bank in order to identify the potential need for stream bank stabilization to protect the bank from erosion. Another opportunity to consider for Gore Creek is how pools or other features could be created in the creek to improve the quality of fishing or potentially improve the creek for other uses. A detailed assessment of the creek corridor is necessary in order to determine precisely where and to what extent these improvements may be feasible. Following completion of this assessment a detailed improvement plan for the creek corridor could be prepared. Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #1, Objective 1.3, Action Step 1.3.2. Improvements #2 — Gore Creek Village Connector The Gore Creek corridor between the west end of Ford Park and Slifer Square provides important pedestrian access to and from the Park and Vail Village (and the Vail Village Parking Structure). Enhancing the walking experience along this connection will improve its effectiveness as an alternative means of accessing the Park. The installation of seating areas, creek overlooks and public art are examples of improvements that could be made to animate this walkway. Any future improvements shall be outside of wetland areas, the 100 -year flood plain or other environmentally sensitive areas. An inventory of the creek corridor to identify such areas should be completed prior to initiating any improvements. Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #4, Objective 4.2, Action Step 4.2.2. Improvement #3 — Entry Monuments at Park's pedestrian entries Pedestrians arrive to Ford Park from one of seven existing entries as identified on the Illustrative Plan. Currently there is inadequate signage or other features identifying 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 56 these locations as entry points to the Park. The goal of this improvement is to formally identify these portals and announce them as gateways, or arrival points to Ford Park. Landscape features, signage, bollards, monuments, archways or other design features, or some combination thereof, could be used to identify these locations. Landscape enhancements to areas proximate to these entries may also be appropriate. A design process is necessary to determine design solutions for these improvements. While specific solutions for these park entry improvements could vary between locations, all should share a common design vocabulary. It will also be important to locate these improvements in a way that compliments the adjacent pedestrian corridor and does not compromise pedestrian circulation. Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #4, Objective 4.2, Action Step 4.2.3. Improvement #4 — Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Education Center The education center is envisioned to include multi -use space for year- around educational programs and other activities, a greenhouse and limited administrative space. Below are design, development and operational parameters and /or criteria to be considered in the detailed design of this facility. • Building and site improvements provide adequate clearances from existing utility lines and drainage improvements and when necessary such lines or improvements are relocated to provide adequate clearances. • A building of approximately 3,500 square feet of gross floor area. • Building designed with a low -scale appearance that does not visually dominate the surrounding area and does not loom over West Betty Ford Way. • Provide appropriate horizontal separation from West Betty Ford Way and from the children's playground in order to not diminish the quality of these spaces. • Ability to construct the project in a manner that does not adversely impact other facilities or uses in the Park. • A viable access management plan designed to minimize to the greatest extent feasible the number and frequency of vehicles accessing the education center. It is acknowledged that a service vehicle or delivery vehicle may occasionally need to drive to the center. However, daily or frequent vehicle access by staff or patrons of the center will not be permitted 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 57 • Acceptable emergency vehicle access to the building and identification of any site improvements necessary to accommodate such access. • Identify the anticipated parking demand from the building and how it will be addressed. No parking shall be provided at the building. • Adequate storage space to meet the operational needs of the building and to minimize the need for vehicle trips to the building. • Coordination with the Vail Recreation District on the need to expand fencing at the athletic fields to protect the building from errant balls. • Evaluate the feasibility of providing public restrooms within the center (see Improvement #7 in Illustrative Plan — Children's Playground Restrooms) Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2.3, Action Step 2.3.2. The site plan and cross - section are conceptual studies for how a building could be designed on this site. While provided by the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, these sketches do not represent a development or design proposal. They are merely depictions of how the building could be designed and there is no implied approval of the concepts depicted below. gore creek "living roof" roof ca no mi w/ line of "observation exposed wood existing deck" in foreground � 5truc, w e '0< D -race to race athletic fields r display/ entry - multi- —. volunteers purpose west betty family education ford way center CONCEPT SECTION SCALE: V = 10'-0" 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 58 r- � existfltQ eklseMg athle retaldiiq4 walls dc x fields �....,pwnred servinparea We pit _- outdoor seating plarNtng boulder wall ■1 � r vanF rnp. terrace egress path — � (� \ oof x •! r �' � _ perrema _AA 'XI wed­ Work houkier .'{ planting searing �• 9- poo',eis luncaian plaza - -�k r....__; existing playground OL e g Iellns F 6orllder - � T -"" — existing pedestrian sealing, '• . ly ding sand gwrd aihj [h c 1 perennial gardens Improvement #5 — Nature Center Over the years a number of additions and modifications have been made to the nature center building. Many of these changes have altered the historic character of this building. An assessment of the building should be completed in order to understand steps that could be taken to restore the architectural integrity of this building and the surrounding area. A current deficiency of the Nature Center is the lack of restroom facilities. If the building is to be renovated consideration should be given to how restrooms could be incorporated into the building. Other improvements to the Nature Center include, re- claiming the informal parking areas proximate to the building and taking steps to limit vehicular access to the site. These site improvements would most efficiently be designed in conjunction with the evaluation of the building. Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2.5, Action Step 2.5.1 -2.4.3 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 59 Improvement #6 — Ford Amphitheater Entry Upgrade /Public Plaza The Vail Valley Foundation has proposed plans for transforming the existing Amphitheater entry into a re- designed and re- purposed Public Plaza. The plaza is intended to provide a more gracious and more functional entry to the amphitheater. The design intent and objective of this improvement is to create a multi -use outdoor space that serves as the primary arrival for the Amphitheater as well as a pre- convene and post- function space during scheduled events. The Public Plaza would also provide a venue for smaller gatherings hosted by other park leaseholders and also be open for public use when not being used for scheduled events. Other elements of the Public Plaza include a tensile roof covering, a tribute to the Ford Family, a small stage within the courtyard, a new donor wall, enhancements to the concession building and ticket windows, and new entry gates to the Amphitheater. Parameters and criteria to be considered: • Plaza design should be done to facilitate /not encumber truck turning movements necessary to provide loading /delivery to the Amphitheater. • Plaza design should be sensitive to and integrated with immediately adjacent improvements at the Alpine Gardens. • Trees removed to accommodate the Public Plaza should be re- located within the Park and to the extent feasible be relocated proximate to the amphitheater. • The space should be available for use by the public when not being used for private functions. • The space should be available for gatherings that support other Park stakeholders (TOV, VRD, BFAG and AIPP). • Any structures /roof elements associated with the public plaza should harmonize with the Amphitheater, not dominate the surrounding area, and conform to the Town's park design guidelines. • Any fencing that may be required to define the courtyard space or for liquor license or other purposes should be subtle and visually unobtrusive. Landscape materials should be used to soften the appearance of the fence. • A viable management plan for minimizing vehicular access to the social courtyard (employees, service vehicles, deliveries, etc.), and for servicing the facility in a manner that minimizes impacts on pedestrian use of Betty Ford Way. Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #2, Objective 2.3, Action Step 2.3.1. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 60 Improvement #7 — Children's Playground Restrooms The playground restrooms provide facilities for the entire Lower Bench. These facilities are under -sized and in need of upgrade and expansion to meet current demand. When designed, the new bathroom building should be one level and be sized no larger than necessary to meet the needs of park users. The location currently considered for the new restrooms is west of the existing facility where play apparatus are currently located. New play apparatus will be provided with the removal of the existing restroom building. The building should not encroach on the adjacent open turf area. The adjoining Alpine Gardens Sub -area identifies a site along West Betty Ford Way and next to the playground for the development of an alpine gardens education center. The potential to incorporate restrooms for playground users within the alpine garden education center should be evaluated. The goal of this approach is to minimize the number of buildings in the Park. Coordination between the Town and the Alpine Gardens will be necessary in order to evaluate the feasibility of this idea Improvement #8 — Betty Ford Way Traffic Control While it is acknowledged that the Alpine Gardens, the Amphitheater and other uses in the Lower Bench require vehicular access, an underlying goal for the Park is to minimize vehicular traffic in this area. Betty Ford Way provides car and truck access to this area. As a means for better regulating traffic into the Lower Bench, the installation of gates, bollards or other improvements will be necessary at either end of Betty Ford Way. In addition to improvements designed to limit car and truck access to the lower bench, a system for managing large truck use on East Betty Ford Way should also be explored. This section of Betty Ford Way is essentially a one -lane road. The purpose of this effort is to prevent two trucks from utilizing East Betty Ford Way at the same time. Refer to Chapter 4, Goal #3, Objective 3.2, Action Step 3.2.3. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 61 Chapter 7- PARK MANAGEMENT Four organizations play a role in the management and operation of Gerald R. Ford Park. The Town of Vail is the owner of the Park and manages the community park on the Lower Bench, the stream tract, parking lot areas and pedestrian corridors. In addition, the Town provides park management and coordination with the Park's three leaseholders. The leaseholders manage and operate their respective facilities: The Vail Recreation District lease includes the Tennis Center, athletic fields and land that includes the Nature Center. The Tennis Center Building is on land owned by the Town but was developed and funded by the VRD. VRD offers environmental education and research opportunities at the Nature Center. The Vail Valley Foundation manages and maintains the Ford Amphitheater and immediate surrounding grounds. The amphitheater seats up to 2,500 people and is scheduled an average of 60 days during the summer months. Betty Ford Alpine Gardens manages the Gardens. The Gardens have developed in four phases that began in 1987. In its role as the overall park manager, the Town addresses a variety of management and operational considerations. Often times this requires the involvement of different town departments and town commissions and boards. Ultimately the Vail Town Council is asked to review and approve management practices. The Town involves one or more of the Park leaseholders when addressing these management topics and in some cases the lease agreements with the Recreation District, the Vail Valley Foundation and the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens address these topics. Below is a list of park management topics the Town is responsible for: • Parking — Management of parking spaces, allocation of spaces to leaseholders, rates at times pay - parking is implemented, etc. • Special events on parking lot, athletic fields and open turf area — coordination with promoters of events, scheduling, pre and post -event operations, etc. • Park Calendar — While not responsible for scheduling events within leaseholder facilities, the Town coordinates (with leaseholders) a comprehensive events schedule for the Park. • Transportation — management of transit operations between the Park and the Vail Transportation Center, including periodic implementation of a Golden Peak bus route. • AIPP projects — The review of art programs and installations in the Park. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 62 • Proposals for new uses, new building or changes to the Park — The review of any proposed change to the Park will involve the Vail Town Council and may also involve the Planning and Environmental Commission, the Design Review Board, AIPP and the Commission on Special Events. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 63 Chapter 8 - APPENDIX An extensive number of documents relative to the history of the Park and previous park planning efforts have been assembled. Due to the volume of this material, these documents are provided in a separate document, the 2013 Ford Park Master Plan Supplemental Appendix. Material found in the Supplemental Appendix includes: 1. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973, authorizing the purchase (by condemnation) of the property known as the Antholz Ranch. 2. The Vail Plan, 1974. 3. Resolution No. 1, Series of 1977, naming the property commonly known as the Antholz Ranch to Gerald R. Ford Park. 4. The Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park Master Plan Development Final Report, 1985. 5. Resolution No. 27, Series of 1987, this resolution designated the seven acres around the Nature Center as an area to be preserved as an example of the Gore Valley's natural history. 6. Resolution No. 44, Series of 1988, amending the 1985 Master Plan to add four tennis courts and to change the location of the aquatics center. 7. Ford Park Management Plan, 1997. 8. Ford Park Management Plan Update, 2012. 9. BFAG Building Site Evaluation Matrix. 10. Betty Ford Alpine Gardens — Site Evaluation, Martin /Martin, August 15, 2013. 2013 Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Page 64 0) rowN of vain Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 9, 2014 SUBJECT: A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -16, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a liquor store, located at 286 Gore Creek Drive (A &D Building) /Lots A and B, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140013) Applicant: 10th Mountain Whiskey & Spirit Company Planner: Joe Batcheller I. SUMMARY The applicant, 10th Mountain Whiskey & Spirit Company, is requesting a conditional use permit for a liquor store at 286 Gore Creek Drive. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of this application subject to the findings noted in Section VIII of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant, 10th Mountain Whiskey & Spirit Company, is proposing to open a specialty liquor store in the former Art on a Whim space in the A & D Building, located at 286 Gore Creek Drive. The business is an upstart, craft distillery located in Gypsum. Ownership would like to open a retail outlet and tasting room featuring the 10th Mountain Whiskey and Spirit brand in Vail Village. The commercial space is approximately 638 square feet in size. The proposal does not include any changes to the exterior of the building, except a change of signage, which would be part of a separate design review application. A vicinity map (Attachment A) and the applicant's request (Attachment B) have been attached for review. III. BACKGROUND Liquor stores have been a conditional use permit in the Commercial Core 1 District since the inception of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations in 1973. IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code (in part) ARTICLE 12 -7B. COMMERCIAL CORE 1 (CC1) DISTRICT 12 -7B -1: PURPOSE. The commercial core 1 district is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The commercial core 1 district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The zoning regulations in accordance with the Vail Village urban design guide plan and design considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the village. CHAPTER 12 -16. CONDITIONAL USES PERMITS (in part) SECTION 12 -16 -1. PURPOSE; LIMITATIONS. In order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review and evaluation so that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties and the town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations as the town may prescribe to ensure that the location and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with development objectives of the town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permits shall be denied. The Vail Village Master Plan (in part) V. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND ACTION STEPS GOAL #2 TO FOSTER A STRONG TOURIST INDUSTRY AND PROMOTE YEAR - AROUND ECONOMIC HEALTH AND VIABILITY FOR THE VILLAGE AND FOR THE COMMUNITY ASA WHOLE. Objective 2.2. Recognize the importance of Vail Village as a mixed use center of activities for our guests, visitors and residents. 1V VI Objective 2.4. Encourage the development of a variety of new commercial activity where compatible with existing land uses. SITE ANALYSIS Address: 286 Gore Creek Drive Legal Description: Lots A and B, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1 Zoning: Commercial Core 1 District Land Use Plan Designation: Village Master Plan Current Land Use: Mixed Use Geologic Hazards: None SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Zone District Commercial Core 1 Commercial Core 1 Commercial Core 1 Commercial Core 1 VII. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. The Town of Vail development objectives noted in Section IV include enhancing the livelihood of the commercial cores, as well as providing new retail experiences and options for guests. Staff finds that this conditional use permit will positively impact these objectives, as 1ot" Mountain Whiskey & Spirit Company provides a different retail experience than other liquor stores in Vail Village. This specialty liquor store will exclusively feature the 1ot" Mountain Whiskey & Spirit brand, which offers five varieties of liquor. Further, staff believes the nature of the business will enhance the streetlife of this commercial area, which typically has less foot traffic than other parts of Vail Village. This specialty liquor store could potentially serve as an anchor to this part of Vail Village and provide a stable tenant to a retail space that has experienced above normal turnover in years past. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. Land Use North Mixed Use South Mixed Use East Mixed Use West Mixed Use Zone District Commercial Core 1 Commercial Core 1 Commercial Core 1 Commercial Core 1 VII. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. The Town of Vail development objectives noted in Section IV include enhancing the livelihood of the commercial cores, as well as providing new retail experiences and options for guests. Staff finds that this conditional use permit will positively impact these objectives, as 1ot" Mountain Whiskey & Spirit Company provides a different retail experience than other liquor stores in Vail Village. This specialty liquor store will exclusively feature the 1ot" Mountain Whiskey & Spirit brand, which offers five varieties of liquor. Further, staff believes the nature of the business will enhance the streetlife of this commercial area, which typically has less foot traffic than other parts of Vail Village. This specialty liquor store could potentially serve as an anchor to this part of Vail Village and provide a stable tenant to a retail space that has experienced above normal turnover in years past. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. Because the proposal replaces an existing retail establishment with a specialty liquor store within an existing building, Staff believes it will not have any effect on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities and other public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. As a business in the pedestrian oriented Vail Village, most patrons will be frequenting other businesses in the same trip and /or will be staying in close proximity to the business. There are no changes to the exterior of the building proposed. For these reasons, Staff finds that the proposal will not have any effect on traffic, automotive and pedestrian safety, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability and removal of snow. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. As a specialty liquor store, this commercial space will maintain the character of the area, eliminating a vacant space recently held by an art gallery. There are no effects on scale and bulk because there are no exterior changes to the structure. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning an Environmental Commission approves, with conditions, this conditional use permit to allow for a liquor store, located at 286 Gore Creek Drive (A &D Building) /Lots A and B, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission passes the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission approves this request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -7B -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a liquor store, located at 286 Gore Creek Drive (A &D Building) /Lots A and B, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. " Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission imposes the following conditions: I . Illuminated signs, such as neon, gas filled or LED lit signs, shall not be visible from the exterior of the business. " Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: "Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section Vll of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated June 9, 2014, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds. 1. The proposed conditional use permit is in accordance with the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and the Commercial Core 1 District. 2. The proposed conditional use permit and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained are not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The proposed conditional use permit complies with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 12 -16, Conditional Use Permit, Vail Town Code." IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Applicant's request May 15, 2014 ATTN: Planning and Environmental Commission C /O: Town of Vail RE: Conditional Use Application for 286 Bridge Street To Whom It May Concern, Please find to follow, as required for the Conditional Use Application submitted on Monday, May 12`', 2014 for 286 Bridge Street, whose Legal Description is: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 Block: 5A Lot: C PT OF BK -0404 PG -0411 QCD 01- 08-85, the additional criteria needed in order to further process the aforementioned application. The 10`h Mountain Whiskey & Spirit Company, LLC plan to occupy this location for the purpose of opening the Vail Valley's is` "Tasting Room" providing both the sale of retail hard /soft goods (t- shirts, hats, etc...) and alcohol spirits exclusive to the 10`h Mountain Whiskey & Spirit Company, LLC products only. This location will offer sample tastings of the 10`h's products that are produced and distributed from the Town of Gypsum in Eagle County. With convenient access from Gore Creek Drive, we feel this location is suiting for deliveries of goods and products with minimal impact to the surrounding businesses such as Patagonia and Gorsuch. As both of these locations have become long -time destination based retail locations for visitors and locals we feel this business will soon become the same. 1) Relationship/ impact of Use on Development Objectives of the Town of Vail: With offices located in the Gateway Building at 12 Vail Road, this location will have minimal storage needs which will also ad in reducing the amount of delivery traffic. 2) Effect of use on Light /Air, distribution of population, , transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facility needs. Hours of operation will neighbor around a 10:00 a.m. opening and 8:00 p.m. closing with peak hours occurring between 12:00 noon and 6:00 p.m. This location and its visitors will be able to utilize the Vail Transportation and Parking Systems. Outdoor seating will provide a place for all visitors who may be shopping at the Tasting Room or a neighboring business to sit and relax while they shop (seating of 3 to 4 tables maximum) to enjoy a hidden view flowing waters to the Gore Creek. CHRISTIAN AVIGNON PO BOX 574 RYAN THOMPSON (970) 331 -3261 VAIL, CO 81658 (970) 331 -3402 3) The effect upon traffic, congestion, auto and pedestrian safety & convenience, traffic flow, snow removal and parking. This proposed use will have no impact on traffic flow for auto or pedestrian traffic, nor an impact on snow removal; i.e. outdoor seating will not be offered in the winter season. 4) The effect upon the character of the area, in which the proposed use is to be located, included scale and bulk of proposed use in relation to surrounding areas. The 10`h Mountain Whiskey & Spirit Company was created and will promote, through its sales and exposure, the history of Vail as it has been passed down from generation to generation, just as it has been for co -owner Christian Avignon, whose grandfather was a member of the 10`h Mountain Division. Following the Mountain Lifestyle character and image as a business in the Vail Village, it is the intention of owners Christian Avignon and Ryan Thompson to not only bring back founding memories for those of all ages who visit but also to create new ones for Vail's current and future patrons. Thank you for the opportunity to bring this exciting new concept to the Vail Valley. Regards, Christian Avignon Ryan Thompson Owners, 101h Mountain Whiskey & Spirit Company, LLC CHRISTIAN AVIGNON PO BOX 574 RYAN THOMPSON (970) 331 -3261 VAIL, CO 81658 (970) 331 -3402 Ad Name: 10255052A PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION June 9, 2014 at 12:30pm Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33 75S. Frontage Road- Vail, Colorado, 81657 �'� Daily MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Val 7 ■ La 1 y tome pm -Legal Training Matt Mire, Town At- N11 1�/7 torney 30 minutes 15 Minutes 1.A request for the review of a conditional use PROOF OF PUBLICATION permit, pursuant to Section 12 -7B -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a liquor store, located at 286 Gore Creek Drive (A &D Building) /Lots A and B, Block 5A, Vail Village Fil- } (PEC140013 fling forth details in regard thereto. STATE OF COLORADO Applicant: 10th Mountain Whiskey }Q Plan ��77s ner: Joe Batcheller ACTION: } CONDITIONS: 60 COUNTY OF EAGLE CONDITIONS: 60 minutes 2.A request for the review of a conditional use Permit, pursuant to 12 -9C -3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for a public and quasi - public indoor I Don Rogers do solemnly swear that I am a qualified community facilities (education center), to allow for > > the construction of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Education Center, located 530 South Frontage representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper Road/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (P EC 140005) printed, in whole or in part and published in the County by Hu Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, represented v Planner: Jonathan Spence of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously CONDITIONS: 3.A request for the review of a variance from Sec - and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of tion 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to more than fifty—two consecutive weeks next rior to the first allow for the construction of an addition within the fly' p front setback area, located at 1807 Alpine Drive /Lot 44, Vail Village West Filing 1, and setting forth de- publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and tails in regard thereto. (PEC140012) g Applicant: Contro Ituarte, Magdalena Sofia - Moren that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice Planner: rJeonathan Spence Pierce Architects ACTION: Table to July 14, 2014 and advertisement as requested. MOTION: SECOND:VOTE: 4.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan, to establish a comprehensive The Vail Dail is an accented legal advertising edium redevelopment plan for the Vail Valley Medical Y p g g 7 Center, Lot 10 (Town of Vail parking lot), and US Bank Building, located at 181 and 281 West Mead - only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home ow Dnve and 108 South Frontage Road West/ Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, and Lot D -2, A Resubdivision of Lot D Vail Village Filing 2, and Rule provision. setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140011) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Tabled to June That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was MOTION: SECOND:VOTE ?3,2014 published in the regular Oular and entire issue of every 5.A request for the review of variances from Y "J Section 12 -7D -9 Landscaping and Site Development Section 12 -7D -10 Parking and number of said daily newspaper for the period of I Loading, Section 14 -5 -1, Minimum Standards and Section 14 -5 -2 Other Requirements, Vail Town consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said Code, pursuant Chapter Variances, Vail Y Town Code, for reell Chapter from the e min landscape notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 6/6/2014 and requirement, the parking space dimensional requirement, the snow storage requirement and to allow parking in the front setback, to facilitate the that the last publication of said notice was dated 6/6/2014 in construction parkin n freestanding building with associated parking, circulation and landscape improvements, located at 2171 North Frontage the issue of said newspaper. Road West (McDonald'syLot 2B, Vail Das Schone Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC 130018) Applicant: McDonald's USA, LLC, represented by Robert Palmer In witness whereof, I have here unto set m hand this day, Planner: Jonathan Spence Y Y ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014 06/06/2014. MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 6.A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -7D -2, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a drive -up facility, located at 2171 North Frontage Road West /7 ( McDonald's)/Lot 2B, Vail Das Schone Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130014) Applicant: McDonald's USA, LLC, represented by Robert Palmer Planner: Jonathan Spence General Man ager/Publisher/Editor ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Vail Daily 7.A request for a variance from Section 14 -3 -1, Table 1, Minimum Standards, Vail Town Code, Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for pursuant to Section 14 -1 -5, Variances, Vail Town "� p Code, to allow for a residential driveway to exceed the C 2754 County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 06/06/2014. the peSnowberry rmitted maximum c Drive /Lot 15, Block, 9, Vail In- termountain and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140007) Applicant: Mike Dantas, represented by Mau hello Planning Group Planner: Joe Batcheller ACTION: Withdrawn � 8.Approval of May 19, 2014 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 9.Informaton Update Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public 10.Adjoumment My Commission expires: November 1, 2015 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The applications and information about the propos- als are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of pRY P(� terns are approximate, subject to change, and •'••••'•• e( cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the �': • ;� Planning and Environmental Commission will PAMELA J. consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation SCHULTZ is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the 9),;•., RQ�+ Hearing Impaired, forinformation. Community Development Department Published June 6, 2014 in the Vail Daily. My Commission Expires 11IOIQ015 (10255052)