Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-0728 PECTOWN OF VAft� PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION July 28, 2014 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visit: none 15 minutes 1. A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12 -6D -9, Site Coverage, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140018) Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by MJ Mueller Co. Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 90 minutes 2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on approaches to address identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan as an outcome of the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project, an initiative to examine the Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines applicable to Vail Village. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved development plan for the Cornerstone site to facilitate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive /Unplatted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140019) Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 4. Approval of July 14, 2014 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5. Information Update Page 1 6. Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published July 25, 2014 in the Vail Daily. Page 2 TOWN OF VAft� PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION July 28, 2014 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visit: none 15 minutes 1. A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12 -6D -9, Site Coverage, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140018) Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by MJ Mueller Co. Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0 CONDITION(S): 1. The variance approvals are contingent on the Applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval of a design review application for the proposed additions. 2. The Applicant shall submit a revocable right -of -way permit to Public Works for all improvements located within the Bellflower Drive right -of -way prior to requesting final public works inspections. 3. The Applicant shall remove the kitchen in the lower level second unit to be in full compliance with the Vail Town Code prior to requesting final planning inspections. 4. The Applicant shall trim the large existing evergreen tree in the front yard so that no limbs hang below 7 feet as measured from the ground, upward, prior to the requesting final planning inspections. Warren Campbell gave a presentation pursuant to the memorandum. Commissioner Cartin asked why there was a condition regarding the limbing of the evergreen to a height of 7 feet. Warren explained that it had to do with vehicular safety and sight visibility lines. Commissioner Cleveland asked about the difference between a kitchen and a kitchenette. Warren explained the definition of a kitchenette. Page 1 Commissioner Martin encouraged the applicant to replace all the existing siding on the south elevation as it was showing its age and likely beyond repair. Carl Mueller stated he would convey that message to Mr. Peters. Commissioner Pratt mentioned that the plans showed a single bathroom for three bedrooms and that there should not be a future variance application to incorporate a bathroom within the setbacks. There was no public comment. Commissioner Cartin asked if a condition should be added to address the siding issue. It was agreed that it was not necessary because it would be addressed during the DRB review. 90 minutes 2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on approaches to address identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan as an outcome of the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project, an initiative to examine the Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines applicable to Vail Village. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Recommendation of approval MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Hopkins VOTE: 6 -0 -0 Warren Campbell gave a presentation pursuant to the memorandum. He also spoke to his conversation with Carmel, CA, per the direction provided at the previous Commission hearing. Tom Braun stated the discussion today would center around the development review process and the five topics for further evaluation. He proceeded to give a presentation per his Power Point. Expansion of the Application of the Urban Design Guide Plan Tom Braun introduced the topic. Commissioner Cartin mentioned the difference between the "should" and "shalls" and how the revised UDGP might address that difference. Commissioner Kurz spoke to a concern regarding how the expansion of the UDGP would /could be applied to buildings that have already redeveloped. How and what effect would there be. Believed it was important to bring as much of the area under control of the plan. Suggested the Village Core may have differing requirements. Commissioner Cleveland expressed reservations about expanding the area for the UDGP. He stated that when the Council decided to move forward with this project the scale of the Village was the issue of concern. It was about the Village Core and how to preserve its uniqueness in terms of architecture and scale. The lack of color has always been of concern. There should be an ability to have differing neighborhoods. He mentioned that Meadow Drive has turned out well and any overlay expanding the restricting design is not the way to go. Page 2 Commissioner Pratt said that the UDGP should be expanded and that the peripheral areas should tie into the core. Having a small scale village surround by New York scale buildings is not the way to go. Steel and stone did not make Vail famous. He discussed how one or two bad snow years causes a shift in thinking during the review of development applications which tends to turn to revenue generation as a key consideration. The documents being discussed need to provide long term guidance for town councils, planning and environmental commission, and design review boards, as there can be strong and weak boards implementing the regulations. Commissioner Cleveland statted that if the UDGP limits were to be expanded the incorporation of strong language define various sub -areas and what is appropriate. Landmarks. Tom Braun introduced the topic. Warren Campbell raised a question regarding Vail's history in American ski heritage and the potential to preserve that heritage. Commissioner Hopkins described scenarios where drywall was holding up joists and studs when describing some of the initial construction in town. When Vail became a destination resort it changed everything with regard to guest expectations. Commissioner Cartin expressed that scale and the quaint feeling is most important to preserve Commissioner Cleveland discussed the significance of the Gorsuch clock tower. Let's not hamstring potential development, but let's preserve those landmarks that are quintessential Vail. Vail doesn't have a lengthy history like other communities (mining, agricultural). 50 years is a short period of time. Vail sells service and at the current price point guests have certain expectations of quality. He was not sure the battle to identify structures as landmarks needed to be fought anymore. Commissioners Webb, Kurz and Pratt agreed. Pratt expressed concern legislating the preservation of open space that is privately owned. Commissioner Kurz expressed the need to capitalize on certain locations, encouraging developers to build landmarks. Warren Campbell asked if anything should be done today to establish structures worth saving in the future? Commissioner Pratt said to encourage landmarks could be problematic, as landmarks to past generations have a lesser meaning to young generations. Tom Braun then spoke to the mechanisms other communities have developed in order to preserve their character. The communities of Santa Fe, Park Cirty and Santa Barabra were discussed in regards to what they do to preserve and protect their communities and how that may be applicable in Vail. Commissioner Cleveland stated that real estate was a commodity and what people desired changes over time and therefore any adopted document should allow for change. Page 3 Commissioner Kurz said he was still struggling will how to define landmarks. Tom Braun suggested another approach to addressing landmarks could be a discussion of scale and architecture that needs to be protects. Non - conforming Properties and Redevelopment Tom Braun introduced the topic. He identified scale as potentially most important factor to include into the UDGP. Commissioner Pratt said the Covered Bridge building presented an impractical application of the 60/40 height limit. He stated the need for a pragmatic approach to regulating height. Maybe a 10% variation is warranted. Pratt then discussed the need for constant upkeep for buildings. Commissioner Hopkins agreed and added a concern regarding vacant properties. Commissioner Cleveland stated that it is not the government's role to regulate upkeep. Commissioner Cleveland thought the proposal presented by Tom were appropriate. Tom then discussed architectural character and the lack of articulation within the UDGP in this regard when compared to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Commissioner Pratt mentioned compatibility as an important factor worth considering a development proposal. Sometimes bad projects have been approved due to a lack of stringent criteria. Commissioner Cartin used the Wall Street Building as an example of how a project can change between a PEC approval and a DRB approval based upon each groups review elements. He agreed with the idea of establishing criteria which were focused on height variances in the Village. Architectural Character and Specific Elements of the UDGP Tom Braun introduced the topic. Several PEC members agreed that compatibility is important as discussed by Tom. Commissioner Pratt stated than more compatibility language may provide for enforceable regulations while allowing for flexibility. The Village does not need guidelines and standards as detailed as the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Commissioner Kurz mentioned the need to upgrade the graphics within the UDGP and define the architectural character elements desired. He also spoke to the need to forward recommendations to other boards regarding projects. There needs to be an effective tool to understanding the rationale when Council overturns a PEC action. Commissioner Pratt discussed how Swiss, Austrian, and Tyrolean architecture are all very different. He added the new fad is mountain contemporary. When need to decide and clarify Vail's architecture. Page 4 Tom Braun then discussed identifying opportunities to expand retail Commissioner Pratt stated the streetscape in some areas (1 Willow Bridge Rd) as the result of expanded retail resulted in an expanse of paving without and softscape. There should have been some landscaping incorporated into the redesign. Commissioner Cartin cited examples of island planters that work within Town and allowing for private property to propose planters on Town property as well. Tom Braun then discussed transparency /windows. There is a lot language in this section that is ambiguous. It needs to be more definitive. Tom went on to discuss landscaping and sun /shade. Commissioner Pratt mentioned Arrabelle as a poor example of excessive shading in the winter on the north side adjacent to Lift House Lodge. Others agreed that it is one of the few mistakes with the Lionshead redevelopment. Commissioner Cleveland suggested no additional shading of a street should be permitted. Tom Braun mentioned dining decks and patios as features of the Village worth preserving due to their contribution to street life. The Commissioners echoed the importance of the deck and patios. Tom also identified public plazas as another important element of the Village that should be identified as such in the UDGP. Commission Pratt agreed. Tom Braun stated that rooftop equipment should also be addressed in the UDGP. Pam Hopkins said noise needs to be regulated in the UDGP as well. Tom then mentioned a few housekeeping items —the roles of the boards, calculating height, updating maps and graphics. Commissioner Cleveland asked about the next steps. Warren Campbell explained that this recommendation would be taken forward to the Town Council and if there was agreement to move forward with a process of exploring amendments staff would propose a budget and time line for such an effort. 3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved development plan for the Cornerstone site to facilitate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive /Unplatted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140019) Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014 MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6 -0 -0 4. Approval of July 14, 2014 minutes MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0 5. Information Update Page 5 6. Adjournment MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published July 25, 2014 in the Vail Daily. Page 6 0 . )rowN of vain Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 28, 2014 SUBJECT: A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12 -6D -9, Site Coverage, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140018) Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by MJ Mueller Co. Planner: Warren Campbell SUMMARY The Applicant, Alan and Francine Peters, represented by Carl Mueller, is requesting variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, subject to the findings noted in Section VIII of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The Applicant is requesting variances from Section 12 -6D -6 Setbacks, for the front and west side setbacks to allow for a new one -car garage with master bedroom above, a covered entry porch. To accomplish the proposed additions a request for a site coverage variance has been included. The final variance from Section 14 -3- Town of Vail Page 1 2F, Other Requirements, is to allow for 2 vehicle parking spaces to be partially located within the Town owned, Bellflower Drive, right -of -way. The request for a variance to Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, is no longer need due to the elimination of the second dwelling unit on the property. The applicant proposes to remove the kitchen to comply with Town Code to create a wet bar in the recreation room. A vicinity map (Attachment A), written request from the applicant (Attachment B) and plans dated June 30, 2014 (Attachment C) are attached for reference. On April 28, 2008 the applicant received variance approvals to setbacks and parking requirements, similar to this current proposal. The previous approvals have since expired. Therefore, the applicant is returning to the Planning and Environmental Commission to request the approval of a slightly modified proposal. In the time period since 2008 the applicant pursued the construction of the project as approved, however, only completed those portions of the plan to expand the living and dining rooms into the west setback. The applicant's current request is slightly modified to remove the second unit on the property, which was previously going to become a Type I EHU which included a site coverage increase of 5 %. The proposal to remove the second units and not place a deed restriction on the unit has resulted in a request for a site coverage variance. Additionally, the dimensions and area of the proposed garage have been reduced from 462 to 289 square feet. The descriptions of the variances requested are as follows 1. Front Setback: The applicant is requesting to vary the front setback from the required 20 feet to a range of 9.5 feet to 13 feet to allow for a one -car garage addition. A new front entry includes 6 square feet of GRFA within the front setback. The roof covering over the entry extends 3 feet into the required 16 foot setback for roof elements. (Covered entries are allowed to encroach into the setback 4 feet). Approximately 220 square feet, of the 289 square foot garage is proposed within the front and west side setbacks. Approximately 6 square feet of GRFA for the new front entry is proposed within the front setback. 2. West Side Setback: The applicant is requesting to vary the west side setback from the required 15 feet to a range of 6 feet to 7 feet to allow for a one -car garage addition and master bedroom over a portion of the garage. Approximately 220 square feet of the 289 square foot garage is proposed within the front and west side setbacks. Approximately 110 square feet of the proposed master bedroom above the garage, is proposed within the west side setback. 3. Site Coverage: The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum allowable site coverage by 123 square feet (1.4 %). Town of Vail Page 2 4. Parking in the right -of -way: The Applicant is requesting a variance from the requirement that all required parking be located on site. Two of the proposed surface parking spaces encroach up to 13 ft. into the Bellflower Drive right -of -way. III. BACKGROUND The original plat for this property was recorded in 1970 under Eagle County jurisdiction. The existing structure was constructed in 1977 under Eagle County regulations requiring side setbacks of five feet. When the property was annexed into the Town of Vail under Ordinance 15 in 1987 it was zoned Two - Family Primary/ Secondary Residential (PS) District with a minimum front setback of 20 feet and side yard of 15 feet. On November 2, 1983, the Applicant received approval to construct a secondary deed restricted unit on the lot. At that time, the Town Zoning regulations required that one half (1/2) of the required parking be enclosed. The Applicant received a variance from this requirement. The variance was granted based on the difficulty of building a garage on the site, specifically the Planning and Environmental Commission found, "the garage would tend to overcrowd the lot and would impair the common open space between the residence and the residence to the west." On March 26, 2001, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved similar setback and parking variances for this property. On February 7, 2002, the Design Review Board approved the design review application associated with the approved variances from March 26, 2001. On November 24, 2003, the Planning and Environmental Commission again approved similar setback and parking variances for this property. This proposal varies in that the applicant has removed the previously requested den and laundry room and reconfigured the proposed garage, master bedroom, living room, and dining room additions. This approval has since expired. On April 28, 2008, the Planning and Environmental Commission again approved similar setback and parking variances for this property. The approved plans are attached for reference (Attachment D). IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff believes that following provisions of the Vail Land Use Plan and the Vail Town Code are relevant to the review of this proposal: Vail Land Use Plan (in part) Town of Vail Page 3 CHAPTER II: LAND USE PLAN GOALS / POLICIES (in part) The goals articulated here reflect the desires of the citizenry as expressed through the series of public meetings that were held throughout the project. A set of initial goals were developed which were then substantially revised after different types of opinions were brought out in the second meeting. The goal statements were developed to reflect a general consensus once the public had had the opportunity to reflect on the concepts and ideas initially presented. The goal statements were then revised through the review process with the Task Force, the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council and now represent policy guidelines in the review process for new development proposals. These goal statements should be used in conjunction with the adopted Land Use Plan map, in the evaluation of any development proposal. The goal statements which are reflected in the design of the proposed Plan are as follows.. General Growth / Development 1.1. Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.3. The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12. Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 5. Residential 5.1. Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 5.4. Residential growth should keep pace with the market place demands for a full range of housing types. CHAPTER VI, SECTION 4, PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES (in part) LDR Low Density Residential This category includes single- family detached homes and two - family dwelling units. Density of development within this category would typically not exceed 3 structures per buildable acres. Also within this area would be private recreation facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools and club houses for the use of Town of Vail Page 4 residents of the area. Institutional/ public uses permitted would include churches, fire stations, and parks and open space related facilities. Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code (in part) Section 12 -2 Definitions SETBACK: The distance from a lot or site line, creek or stream measured horizontally to a line or location within the lot or site which establishes the permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site. SETBACK LINE. A line or location within a lot or site which establishes the permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site. SETBACK LINE, FRONT. The setback line extending the full width of the site parallel to and measured from the front lot or site line. SETBACK LINE, SIDE. The setback line extending from the front setback line to the rear setback line parallel to and measured from the side lot or site line. Section 12 -6D Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential (PS) District (in part) 12 -6D -1: PURPOSE. The two - family primary /secondary residential district is intended to provide sites for single- family residential uses or two - family residential uses in which one unit is a larger primary residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment, together with such public facilities as may appropriately be located in the same district. The two - family primary /secondary residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single- family and two - family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site development standards. 12 -6D -6. SETBACKS. In the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15), and the minimum rear setback shall be fifteen feet (15). 12- 6D -11: PARKING: Off - street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Title. Section 12 -17 Variances (in part) 12 -17 -1. PURPOSE. A. Reasons For Seeking Variance. In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the Town of Vail Page 5 VA objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon, from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the Applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. B. Development Standards Excepted. Variances may be granted only with respect to the development standards prescribed for each district, including lot area and site dimensions, setbacks, distances between buildings, height, density control, building bulk control, site coverage, usable open space, landscaping and site development, and parking and loading requirements; or with respect to the provisions of chapter 11 of this title, governing physical development on a site. C. Use Regulations Not Affected: The power to grant variances does not extend to the use regulations prescribed for each district because the flexibility necessary to avoid results inconsistent with the objectives of this title is provided by chapter 16, "Conditional Use Permits'; and by section 12 -3 -7, "Amendment" of this title. SITE ANALYSIS Address: 2955 Bellflower Drive Legal Description: Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain Zoning: Two - family Primary/Secondary Residential District Land Use Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Current Land Use: Two - Family Residential Geological Hazards: 100 year Floodplain Development Standard Required Min. Lot Area: 15,000 sq. ft. Min. Setbacks Front: 20' Sides: 15' (east) 15' (west) Rear: 50' Gore Creek Max. Building Height: 33' Max. GRFA: Primary 2,380.2 sq. ft. Secondary not permitted* Total 3,971 sq. ft. Existing Proposed 8,633.59 sq. ft. No change 14.4' 9.5- 14' 12' no change 20.5' 6' - 7' 62.5' no change 25' No change 2,047 sq. ft. 2,209 sq. ft. 583 sq. ft. eliminated 2,630 sq. ft. 2,980 sq. ft. Town of Vail Page 6 Max. Site Coverage: 1,727 sq. ft. (20 %) 1,362 sq. ft. (15.7 %) 1,850 sq. ft. (21.4 %) Min. Landscape Area: 4,743 sq. ft. (55 %) 6,510 sq. ft. (75 %) 6,395 sq. ft. (74.2 %) Min. Parking: 3 spaces 2 spaces 3 spaces (1 enclosed) VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Existing Use North: Residential South: Residential East: Residential West: Residential VII. REVIEW CRITERIA Zoning District Residential Cluster Two - family Primary/Secondary Two - family Primary/Secondary Two - family Primary/Secondary The review criteria for a variance request are prescribed in Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code. 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Front Setback: The applicant is requesting to vary the front setback from the required 20 feet to a range of 9.5 feet to 13 feet to allow for a one -car garage addition. A new front entry includes 6 square feet of GRFA within the front setback. The roof covering over the entry extends 3 feet into the required 16 foot setback for roof elements. (Covered entries are allowed to encroach into the setback 4 feet). Approximately 220 square feet, of the 289 square foot garage is proposed within the front and west side setbacks. Approximately 6 square feet of GRFA for the new front entry is proposed within the front setback. The proposed garage addition is flush with the front of the existing two - family dwelling. Therefore the neighboring property's front yard sight lines are un- affected by the proposed garage addition into the front setback. West Side Setback: The applicant is requesting to vary the west side setback from the required 15 feet to a range of 6 feet to 7 feet to allow for a one - car garage addition and master bedroom over a portion of the garage. Approximately 220 square feet of the 289 square foot garage is proposed within the front and west side setbacks. Approximately 110 square feet of the proposed master bedroom above the garage, is proposed within the west side setback. The existing residence to the west (2963 Bellflower Drive) is situated at an angle that places the home closer to its western property line than to its east, at the point where the proposed garage addition is located (See Attachment A — Vicinity Map). Town of Vail Page 7 Currently the west neighbor parks vehicles within one foot of the shared property line. The west neighboring property has also been granted a variance for its east setback to 6.4 feet. Staff does not believe the neighbor to the west will be negatively impacted by the proposed addition into the west side setback. Site Coverage: The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum allowable site coverage by 123 square feet (1.4 %). There are currently two dwelling units on the property. A lot less than 14,000 square feet in area, such as the subject property, is permitted only a single dwelling unit. In previous requests the applicant proposed to place a Type I EHU deed restriction on the second basement unit on the property. The current proposal is to remove the second unit on the property and bring into conformance with the Vail Town Code with regard to density. The previous requests did not include a site coverage variance as the Type I EHU deed restriction included a permitted increase in site coverage of 5 %. The proposal to increase site coverage by 1.4% supports the town's policy of constructing enclosed garage parking on older properties which is exhibited in the history of variance approvals for garages which commonly include setback and site coverage variances. Parking in the right -of -way: The applicant is requesting a variance from the requirement that all required parking must be located on site. Two of the proposed surface parking spaces encroach up to 13 feet into the Bellflower Drive right -of- way. The lot size, lot configuration and existing structure location make providing the required number of parking spaces, 3, on -site impossible, without a variance to allow parking within the right -of -way. Town of Vail Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and supports the request for 2 of the surface parking spaces within the right -of -way that are generally located in the same footprint as the existing driveway. Public Works requires that a revocable right -of -way permit be issued. Staff is proposing a condition to that effect in Section VIII of this memorandum. Currently, the neighbor to the west, most affected by the proposed parking, provides parking within one foot of the shared property line. Staff does not believe the neighboring properties will be negatively impacted by the proposed parking in the right -of -way. Therefore, Staff believes this proposal will not negatively affect the other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity in comparison to existing conditions. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. Staff does not believe approval of the requested setback, site coverage, and Town of Vail Page 8 parking partially within the right -of -way variances would be a grant of special privilege. The lot size, lot configuration, right -of -way configuration, existing structure, and 50 ft. Gore Creek stream setback are all physical hardships on this lot which greatly restrict the ability of improvements to be made to the structure without a variance. The lot is nonconforming with regards to lot size and the house currently encroaches into the front and side setbacks. Many of the structures in the neighborhood have similar encroachments into the setbacks (see below). Location Description of the site 2923 Nonconforming 4 -plex approved by Eagle County. Bellflower Encroaches 9 ft. into the stream setback, 7.5 ft. into the 2339 east setback, and encroaches into the right -of -way. 2943 Granted a front setback variance to allow for a front Bellflower setback of 13 ft. Side setbacks are nonconforming at 12 ft. 2714 and 5 ft. 2953 Granted a parking variance to not enclose parking in Bellflower conjunction with EHU. Meets all setback requirements. 2963 Granted setback variances allowing for a 6 ft. front Bellflower setback, 6.4 ft. east side setback, and 8.4 ft. side setback. 3003 Granted front setback variance to allow for a 13 ft. front Bellflower setback, with GRFA being allowed beneath the garage. Side setback variance was denied. 2852 Nonconforming. Encroaches into the front setback 9 ft. Bellflower and 1 ft. into side setback. 2942 Granted a front setback variance for a garage and storage Bellflower area to allow for a 15.5 ft. front setback. Nonconforming with a 7 ft. encroachment into the east side setback. 2955 Garage located in front setback. Basingdale 2945 Nonconforming. Encroaches into side setback 7 ft. Basingdale 2935 Granted front setback variance to allow for GRFA below Basingdale garage in front setback. Below grade encroachment of 18.5 ft. 2925 Granted front setback variance to allow for a front setback Basingdale of 13 ft. The following are other properties within the two- family primary/secondary zone district which were granted variances to site coverage to facilitate garages. Location Description of the site 2586 Davos Granted site coverage variance to facilitate garage. Trail Approved at 26% site coverage 2339 Granted site coverage variance to facilitate garage going Chamonix from single car to two cars. Approved at 23% site Lane coverage 2714 Granted site coverage variance to facilitate a new two car Larkspur garage. Approved at 26% site coverage Lane 3140 Booth Granted site coverage variance to facilitate a new two car Falls Court garage. Approved at 23% site coverage Town of Vail Page 9 The proposed garage, entry, and master bedroom additions will improve the functionality and value of the home, an upgrade supported by Land Use Plan Goal 1.3. Staff believes the proposed variance is consistent with the goals of the Town of Vail Land Use Plan and purposes of the Two - family Residential District as identified in Section IV of this memorandum. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed relief from the setback, site coverage and parking location regulations is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity and to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The Public Works Department recommended that the existing evergreen tree in the front yard be trimmed so as not to obstruct the view along Bellflower Drive from a parked vehicle. Staff is proposing a condition to that effect in Section VIII of this memorandum. Staff does not believe that approval of the variance will have a negative effect on the factors listed above. The proposed variances will facilitate an addition in the front and side setback area that will not alter population; will not increase the required number of parking spaces; will not affect any existing transportation or traffic facilities, public facilities, or utilities; and will not affect public safety in comparison to existing conditions. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed variance conforms to this criterion. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. Another factor in consideration of the requested variances is that the Planning and Environmental Commission has approved similar variances on the subject property on three previous occasions (March 26, 2001, November 24, 2003, and April 28, 2008). VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of the requested variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12 -6D -9, Site Coverage, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VII of this memorandum. Town of Vail Page 10 Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance requests, the Community Development Department recommends, the Commission pass the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the request for variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12 -6D -9, Site Coverage, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. " Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance requests, Staff recommends the following conditions: "1. The variance approvals are contingent on the Applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval of a design review application for the proposed additions. 2. The Applicant shall submit a revocable right -of -way permit to Public Works for all improvements located within the Bellflower Drive right -of- way prior to requesting final public works inspections. 3. The Applicant shall remove the kitchen in the lower level second unit to be in full compliance with the Vail Town Code prior to requesting final planning inspections. 4. The Applicant shall trim the large existing evergreen tree in the front yard so that no limbs hang below 7 feet as measured from the ground, upward, prior to the requesting final planning inspections. " Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the variance requests, Staff recommends the Commission, make the following findings: "1. That the granting of the variances do not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential District. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the setback and parking regulations results in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the development objectives of the Town of Vail Page 11 Town Code or the Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential District. 4. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the Applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential District." Town of Vail Page 12 IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Applicants' Written Request C. Proposed Architectural Plans dated June 30, 2014 D. Previously approved plans and Results from April 2008 Town of Vail Page 13 Town of Vail Page 14 June 30, 2014 Planning and Environmental Commission Town of Vail Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Narrative for the Peters Variances, 2955 Bellflower Drive (PEC08 -0018) Dear PEC Members, This is a revision to the above referenced PEC number where we were granted Front, east and west setbacks, Parking in the ROW and a Reduction in Required Parking numbers from 5 to 4 for a garage entry addition and an enlargement of the Living Dining rooms. The enlargement of the Living Dining rooms was completed in 2010 as a Phase 1 addition and utilized the variance to the East setback. The 2008 PEC submittal converted the existing secondary unit into an EHU. This proposal converts the existing secondary kitchen into a kitchenette for the recreation room and eliminates the EHU. We are requesting a revision to the following granted variances and one additional site coverage variance. 1. Front Setback: We are requesting a revision to the granted front setback of 9 feet to the proposed 9.5 feet. The granted variance had no GRFA and approximately 105 square feet of the garage within the front setback. The proposed revision has approximately 6 square feet of new GRFA and approximately 114 square feet of the garage within the front setback. 2. Side Setback (west): We are requesting to allow the granted side setback of 5.5 feet to remain as granted. The granted variance had approximately 62 square feet of new GRFA and approximately 168 square feet of the garage in the west setback. The proposed revision has approximately 110 square feet of new GRFA and 106 square feet of garage in the west setback. 3. Side Setback (east): The Living Dining addition within the granted 11.8 feet setback was completed in 2010. 4. Parking in the right -of -way: The granted variance was for 4 parking spaces (1 in the garage and 3 into the right -of -way). The proposed residence without the secondary or EHU requires 3 parking spaces as the total GRFA is less than 4000 square feet. We are requesting a variance from the requirement that all parking must be located on site (1 in the garage and 2 into the right - of -way). 5. Site Coverage: No variance for site coverage was required in the 2008 submittal. Removal of the EHU eliminated the entitled 5 percent additional site coverage and the 5 percent reduction of landscape area. We conform to the required landscape area. We are requesting a variance in site coverage to allow 123 square feet more than our allowed 20 percent of the total area of the site. We believe that the physical hardships of this property warrant variance approval. Lot 6 is 8,633 sq. ft. in area, approximately 64' in width adjacent to the street and the front property line is not parallel with the street. The existing structure is closer to the sloping east property line with the entry and parking located on the west side of the property. The addition of the garage and entry over part of the existing parking as shown on plan with a bedroom above is consistent with the planning polices and development objectives in the Town of Vail without grant of special privilege. The adjacent properties are faced with similar limitations and the parking as shown on our site plan is a solution found throughout this neighborhood. Please contact us with any questions or comments at the number below. Sincerely, THE MJ MUELLER CO., INC. Mark and Carl Mueller P. O. Box 2747 Vail, CO. 81658 970 476 -2627 °a >- Alt l\J \ \ I m O _ J 1 CL Iry f z y � p a� N� I �s I y � I I LS V 0 22 � t 0 z w o �1 X95 acl�� ;S'I _ O � O o U�pZ CL ZZY� �ith r - 999L9 opeioloa `llen LZ9Z91b LDLZ xogo•d -oui `•oo aopanw rw ay; �r o _ "o 1` O naryJO107 '-nvn X00 �O�c'61�01'L'# -19711Vd 'VSirno1�31139 S.SbZ "any 'tea -ft-VA "J-Lol Noulda -V 5,zialaj -Hoa 2f4(,C of -lAaAlH4,19 ' ?7 w IN N Ln $$ $ $'$ O O 5 U+ M -.� o �cL p�1! uj 3 0� ° 19 P r�- �r o _ "o 1` O naryJO107 '-nvn X00 �O�c'61�01'L'# -19711Vd 'VSirno1�31139 S.SbZ "any 'tea -ft-VA "J-Lol Noulda -V 5,zialaj -Hoa 2f4(,C of -lAaAlH4,19 ' ?7 w IN Z N Ln n 0� Z 889L8 opeiopa ylen LZ9Z9L4 LbLZ xoq -o-d -oui `Y)o jollentu (w e} tooto�b4�OIL�i '13�d'�1arlQ"131'�S 55bz -9OS '"4 NIVIOtIOlA*- LNI ' WA 1l i 41OW "9 -to 1 Not- 4-Iadv a214:3-QI1;��d +Ior "-4*r of 'A/111WAnS -):IA °s� t:� z I �+ T — -� n o s� J- j g z z� 1 - - --- ar vo a 3 fl P 3Z z�3 Z t � z III w P 7 . J °s� t:� z I �+ T — -� n o s� J- j g z z� 1 - - --- ar vo a 3 fl P 3Z z�3 Z t � z III w P 7 . sms OPS -10:) `I!BA O a aT! O'109 1-1 1'dn LM-SL4 LVLZx«a'a'd z�ooiorc�I�COIL# 137�d� 'emolil13a �FfL -owi �'oo jollenw rw 94; N -vwnoH -1Nl lWl,, 9 x'19 '9 -4 °I tiaZ vonc ok 'ILaJ1418�5 7311 X� Y _7 wmAl ? -a II �Jo %L �� m w S F �3 W O O WdC � II II II II II _7 wmAl ? -a II J W J �Jo cl s III �� m W O O J W J li1C9k8 OPeaOroO `III Lb 91.4 LiLZ xoq 'old -aui ~`-oo japanw Fw app, 0 Q`lzl0 -10-�, ' II-YA fc+ota��l�ol Z�* -ra° d 143" MAT W SSb2 'Sn� -p�9a HIVIWOH -l�Nl lIVA �>hdla 910 NO I J-14 d.'d (�I3fj �S Uzi Sze � s - Paz arc oti -I�Ih,��g r CP In Qjr IF) Vp Yw�� `Z��J&ppr owC � � y � Z o p OL £2 — — S Hi I F o 0 K3 I is I i -p p � i ,o;u oz N o g � .1 :9 3 jl �I �I ,o;u oz N a q l u l � 2 y, 2 � LL J bL 0 a q l u l � 2 y, 2 � LL H84L8 OPBJOI- 5!g^ LL4Z•9L4 L4LZ xoq .od � sF {oato�cbl�COlz� �a'dd ��o'yYl�9 SSbt '3WI"o* jellentu tw am; 9(r, 'Mao rn>u-NnOW4i.NI 'n-an I% -rza!9 i-J )-&l r N �s3 d �2 Z_Hp �iXi43d-c�n W � N 7 2pC1 OS n. 4`P Ny�e W W 1 i r --HO7, �mr of Wluu4ns n- o- 8 far• � sF 0 F 1I0 i° i P�= n'2 oP F a a pW �YYW ay 3 ly r0 V ' N 0 0 r N � p yam, '� d+• a pW �YYW ay 3 ly r0 V ' N 0 0 - 099LO oppJoloo yeti z9oz4aLV 4WZ xoq otl -au! `na aapanui 1w age. 0 ir. aw 2 '9(V'Aaa. Hp4t4noN+ a tll lydn NDI�I44'sf �N'�415� S���d -plaz 3r,k)P o4 ikiLmOog -�-M S rr } I II Ilp II , i i r ��1 f 0 ir. aw 2 '9(V'Aaa. Hp4t4noN+ a tll lydn NDI�I44'sf �N'�415� S���d -plaz 3r,k)P o4 ikiLmOog -�-M S rr } I II Ilp II , i i r ��1 89948 OpeJO103'118A 00-V--AO-10-7 '11V/\ Lz9z•9L4 LVLZ xoq \S) j,00--LO,&*If,004 55Loz 'DUI I*oo jellentu rwoqs gnr, "a A70-14 -) sal < 11) ;. ilk a r 999L9 opeAopo ylen LZ9Z-9L4 LbLZ xoq •o•d •oui `-oo aapanw fw eta O Q ,V'ZIO.1 -7 11�l1� taafn�b1�o17n# d �14VIOIJ'n3$ 55br/ 9nS'734 NIs/lM1oN4T+1'IIWh 90V 19 101 N � i 1 i c14� �N341s�t Szf�d -61 rrc ar+nC ok n�Jluiiln� �d N � N a� o EE �p. U 4V imm Bp } 2 s� Q w w 6 �1 rF- Q C6 �3F7 z c� U f\ \ C \ y }Nairo } N J 71 ^r d pp � m It S! tti y \ R $� 191 gals -'Qz� 34IG ,91 u� w zIS CL O 9 og I J L-1�I t�9f���I�pIZ #734'ZI31'1�1}�73g 5S6z gns 1'9� NI�cLrinotg2l31N1 lly,A �9 :1� 1$ ,9 1,71 goat T-hJV tI J;Ss h 0 A- WS� i 1 i 0 0 Q fl W fX I � fl ^ x A \/ 0 0 L----41 Loa +- Oe1>>fiolz#�3fid d ��r r�ot3'1 9 55bZ SM •raQ NtVLVVOOl31N1 iWA 'q A -2019 '9 -5pl I�lalll44'� --_IDN�Kt5g�i 5�� -ad Qool 114dy fl Jas :; / .0 VP Y \ 1 1 i 1 O Q- 7 Ql� N t- �F � M-v ry- / .0 VP Y \ 1 1 i 1 O Q- 7 i� 0 DKMI-i-L N t- fco -LO 9-tr1Sa1Z#Y�VA' r�cr� 71�g 55bZ 'g "S -W r4lAdOnOkj: lw 11 /1` ") �9 101 No I a ?N3aI598 'Bon fl 'IkJ-LI V4905 -3Z} e>*A �; F 3 �z O — ' I I a p � � 4 sr �?, a,7- s 1131 01 St \i? �Kl A asscLik;,On `% b2 N a I I � 9 I I p 3Z U W j � 1 -S o I ass odxaOn °G ob oW8, S r+- u b — � O u d �1J z p T N � 1 1' 2!� foota��i�olZ�l3�'d� ��9T'ta?�1'13$ �SbL -gM� n NI�l1NroU�31 �I '1I d/� '9f -Idl goat '11�1dFy £I l3� "IV�11W9nS-azl �t ri- d y and r� p o N yp1yy, 0 O In 1l+II Q� V V' Z z o O .4 N N� Q CA PRI 1gLq., ul za FpL'a' 3 0 �L LL 0 i y and r� p o N yp1yy, 0 O In 1l+II Q� V V' Z z o O .4 N N� Q CA PRI y: toofo��I�pl Z Y bbd' r'f��13¢ 55bZ ans . No 11 I (I(IV % O u Al II. -$ 13003 "Ilbd-V fl 195 I�F1L1W9E1S-3t1 7� x �cST �Z � S S. a N�� � � n ILI LU O A 0 00 % O u Al II. -$ P lu LL i n LU O � 0 00 % O u Al II. O qq,pp W CL J M C K z J P lu LL i � LL O qq,pp W CL J M C K z fL4'�zfQ"I o� '�l'dn 905 T'ai t4l -VLNn jS-w( INA '9��0'� `9 1�1 X0111 QC��f �1N34 �5��! 52131 -�c� t �> '21� d 2 V f, I IL O I d r. $o I I. 3 i -7. 47_^. IL - Ij l 1. '21� d 2 V odwol o7 /-1 Po'/\ ioohOS+I fOIT # 37JVJ `zj�PfaJ4713$ !S-G67 $nS'I t MPtLNnoVSalt4i IIV^ '9 -ion VUUG "rrzd'd tl 135 lvj- "H9n13-?9 lln� t z � N 3N I i i O llI 1Ll -o 0 0- L� BQ"mo? '11bn fOOfo£$Ig017,# 'pia n3 S56Z DS ASQ NIVLN00H'& .NI llVA "9-;;"ff '9 1°I N O LL I G (IV EPN3Q1'33 8 � godL't��db fl 195 W- u'"905 -a4 /�u i Z AL Ll �! J- 1 II II si r4 s �! rtp o � 1 3 14 s K � iA if O rl� I� f� oQb�jo-i o7 "iPd� 4004- b�-�1E0 1Z *13D�- NA'- el9tTa7:4)Ij8 556Z -onS'1\3II NlvionOW�33LHI llil\ '�l 'g 4m I ku(1(,1V 3:)N -4aiS�a S ,8-81---4d d 7d ED I t� m 4-1 L-As �alsiu�ar�- ?I 4- 1 i eY O r� tl 2 il z 0 F V d r- LL O Lu C p � i i i L1] d 7d ED I t� m 4-1 L-As �alsiu�ar�- ?I 4- 1 i eY O r� tl 2 il z 0 F V d r- LL O PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION April 28, 2008 1:OOpm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Rollie Kjesbo Bill Pierce Michael Kurz Sarah R. Paladino (departed at 2:40 after Item 3) Scott Proper Susie Tjossem David Viele Site Visits: 1. Osaki Sushi Restaurant— 100 East Meadow Drive 2. Peters Residence — 2955 Bellflower Drive Driver: Warren 30 minutes 1. A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, 12 -6D -9, Site Coverage, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080018) Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Carl Mueller Planner: Nicole Peterson ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0 1. The variance approvals are contingent on the Applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval of a design review application for the proposed additions. 2. The Applicant shall submit a revocable right -of -way permit to Public Works for all improvements located within the Bellflower Drive right -of -way prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. The Applicant shall deed restrict the secondary dwelling unit as a Type I Employee Housing Unit and file all necessary documentation with the Town of Vail Housing Coordinator prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 4. The Applicant shall trim the large existing evergreen tree in the front yard so that no limbs hang below 7 feet as measured from the ground, upward, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Nicole Peterson presented a summary of the Staff memorandum. Carl Mueller, applicant's representative, was available for questions. There was no public comment. Commissioner Proper asked for clarification of the scope of this proposal in comparison to the other variances granted in the neighborhood. He also clarified the hardships on the property. Page 1 Commissioner Viele noted the similarity of this proposal to past variance approvals. He noted that the house was originally constructed under Eagle County jurisdiction and this variance approval would not be a grant of special privilege. Commissioner Kurz asked for clarification concerning the deed restrictions of the EHU. Commissioner Paladino had no comment. Commissioner Tjossem questioned if the second floor bedroom was a grant of special privilege given its location within the setback. She noted that the garage was a positive addition. Commissioner Kjesbo noted the EHU deed restriction and the new garage are in keeping with the Town's development goals. 15 minutes 2. A request for final review of a final plat for a minor subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13 -4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a re- subdivision of the Front Door Site, located at 151, 250, and 280 Vail Lane /(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department upon request), and setting for details in regard thereto. (PEC080019) Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Approved MOTION: Viele SECOND: Proper VOTE: 6 -0 -0 Warren Campbell presented a summary of the proposal and the Staff memorandum. Warren noted some minor corrections that had been made to the proposed final plat by the applicant's legal representatives subsequent to the printing of the Staff memorandum. Gerry Arnold, Vail Resorts, was available for questions. Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowner's Association, asked for clarification concerning the boundary with Mill Creek Subdivision. There were no Commissioner comments. 15 minutes A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition to the Osaki's Sushi restaurant, located at 100 East Meadow Drive /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080016) Applicant: Takeshi and Kazue Osaki, represented by K.H. Webb Architects Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Recommendation of approval with condition(s) MOTION: Tjossem SECOND: Proper VOTE: 4 -0 -2 ( Kjesbo & Viele recused) 1. The Applicants must obtain final review and approval of the proposed development plan by the Town of Vail Design Review Board, prior to making an application for the issuance of a building permit. 2. The Applicants shall provide the legally executed and duly recorded deed restriction with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office for the off -site employee housing unit prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the construction associated with this amendment. 3. The Applicants shall make the off -site employee housing unit ready for occupancy prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the construction Page 2 � .. � y 2 `� . }.• \ r : . a ,< az - . « . Oil- �. {4 \. ƒ/ � \ TOWN OF VAIL � Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 28, 2014 SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on approaches to address identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan as an outcome of the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project, an initiative to examine the Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines applicable to Vail Village. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell SUMMARY The purpose of this public hearing is to request a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on approaches to address identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan. The Vail Village Character Area Preservation project has reviewed the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations to address the adopted problem statement. The following problem statement was developed in conjunction with the Vail Town Council and has guided the process, discussion and outcomes. As buildings in the Village continue to redevelop or as other changes occur to the physical features of Vail Village, are the Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure that the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced. A recommendation to the Vail Town Council is sought on possible approaches /solutions to address identified elements which need to be potentially amended in order to improve the existing development review process and further the overall design goals for the Village. Five elements have been identified through the public process with the community and the Planning and Environmental Commission as needing to be addressed. Those elements are as follows: • Landmarks o Public places and spaces o Pedestrian streets and corridors o Iconic features • Application boundaries of the Urban Design Guide Plan • Possible expansion • Clarification of when a property is within the boundaries • Non - conforming properties and redevelopment potential • Height in excess of permitted • Dwelling units and GRFA in excess of permitted • Site coverage in excess of permitted • Incentive to redevelop when currently in excess of permitted • Architectural Character • Maintaining a sense of a Vail as a special /identifiable place • Allowing for variety • Core verses outlining areas • Specific Design Elements of the Urban Design Guide Plan o Retail store fronts • Building height • Sun /shade of outdoor spaces • Importance of outdoor dining decks /patios Staff has attached a copy of the March 11, 2013 power point which discusses these elements in greater depth and with imagery (Attachment A). Staff has provided links to the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan under the attachments section of this memorandum for review (Attachments B and C). II. BACKGROUND On February 18, 2009, the Vail Town Council adopted Resolution No. 23, Series of 2008, a resolution that provided for certain updates to the Vail Village Master Plan. One of the more significant updates to the plan was the addition of an objective recognizing the "historic" importance of architecture, structures, landmarks, plazas and features with the goal of preserving the existing character of Vail Village. In addition, one new policy statement was added to the plan to further the newly stated objective. The policy statement was developed to guide the Town's decision - making in achieving each of the stated objectives, whether it be through the review of private sector development proposals or in implementing capital improvement projects. Finally, action steps were suggested as immediate follow -up actions necessary to implement the goals of this Plan. To that end, the Vail Village Master Plan was updated to include the following language: GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY. Town of Vail Page 2 1.4 Objective: (in part) Recognize the "historic" importance of the architecture, structures, landmarks, plazas and features in preserving the character of Vail Village. 1.4.1 Policy: The historical importance of other similar features shall development review process. structures, landmarks, plazas and e taken into consideration in the 1.4.2 Policy: The town should grant flexibility in the interpretation and implementation of its regulations and design guidelines to help protect and maintain the existing character of Vail Village. 1.4.3 Policy: Identification of "historic" importance shall not be used as the sole means of preventing or prohibiting development in Vail Village. GOAL #1 Action Steps: (in part) 6. Compile a list and develop a map identifying the location of potential structures, landmarks, plazas and other similar features that may be of historical importance. On October 18, 2011 the Vail Town Council discussed Vail Village Historic Preservation and Landmark Designation. As a part of the discussion information was provided on historic preservation, preservation programs, creation of historic districts, common property owner concerns regarding historic designation, possible benefits of a historic district, etc. At the public hearing the Vail town Council was asked to respond to the following question: Should Town staff pursue a public process with the community to discuss preserving and protecting historic structures and landmarks in Vail Village and implementing any regulatory tools that may be necessary to carry out the Town's development objectives? The Vail Town Council directed staff to pursue an initiative to preserve and protect historic structures and landmarks in Vail Village. On November 20, 2012 the Vail Town Council was introduced to the Vail Village Character Study that staff and Tom Braun of Braun and Associates was beginning. At the hearing The Vail Town Council was asked to affirm "The Question at Hand" (question provide under summary section of this memorandum). The Vail Town Council affirmed the direction that the project would take and the question it would seek to answer. Town of Vail Page 3 On February 7, 2013 several focus group sessions were conducted to obtain input and feedback on the initiative. Staff and the consultant have placed the comments heard from the focus groups into the following categories: Near Unanimous Consensus The character of the Village is important to Vail's identity, it sets Vail apart, makes Vail unique. It is important to maintain this, to hold onto, reinforce the original vision for the Village. The Village is great, by and large the regulations /guidelines we have in place are working, with only a very few exceptions the new buildings have added /strengthened /reinforced the Village's character The Village core is distinct from the rest of the Village, "character" is strongest in this area. Some variation to the literal interpretation of the "Swiss Alpine village" is OK, not all buildings will be perfect and not all buildings need to be, an anomaly here and there is OK. With regard to buildings, maintaining existing scale of the Village core is critically. There is no one single building in the Village that would rise to "landmark status" rather it is the scale of buildings, the views, the plazas and public spaces, the pedestrian flow, dining decks are what set the Village apart. Iconic improvements — Covered Bridge. The Clock Tower (albeit no clear consensus as to whether the existing clock tower is worthy of preservation or whether having a clock tower in this location is important) Guidelines may need a refinement here or there, but no major overhaul of system is needed. General sense of what is most important — 1 . Building scale 2. Public spaces /pedestrian flow /vitality and street life 3. Quality of design /construction /materials 4. Architecture Widely Held Consensus Some modest degree of additional height in Core might be acceptable (to address floor to ceiling "expectations" of guests) Greater building scale is acceptable outside of the Core (within reason) Town of Vail Page 4 Design controls (UDGP) to further reinforce the Village's establish character should be expanded to area outside of the Core (East Village, Meadow Drive) Street life, vitality, activity ... specifically outdoor dining decks are critical to the character of the Village. Some Degree of Consensus The most important change needed to design guidelines for the Village is to allow for /encourage the use of high quality materials (code talk for materials other than stucco). Guidelines need to encourage creativity /broader expression (while still respecting "alpine" character) More flexibility is needed with regard to window treatments (don't mandate divided panes, allow for larger glass). Need to resolve conflict in Guidelines that require landscaping that blocks visibility of store fronts. Other Pertinent Comments When do you stop using increased levels of development as an incentive for redevelopment? The physical area of "the Village" is considered to extend from Vail Road to Vail Valley Drive, maybe to Manor Vail. Water is very important — both Gore Creek and the water features in the Village. Every site /building is unique, has its own characteristics /considerations that will influence review process. Mechanical — needs to be requirement to screen. What to do with non - conforming buildings — how will they ever have motivation to re- develop? Lodge at Vail, Sitzmark, etc. On February 11, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission was introduced to the project and the desired outcomes upon completion. On March 11, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a work session to begin discussion on elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations which may need to be reexamined to address the project's problem statement. The reults from this hearing are attached (Attachment C). Town of Vail Page 5 The five following topical areas of the Vail Village Master Plan and Vail Village Urban Design Guide were discussed. The topical areas were developed through the focus group participation, staff's, and consultant's experience and observations. The five topics area were as follows: • Architectural Character — Vail Village was "originally conceived as a mountain resort in the pattern of a quaint European alpine Village. Do the Town's guidelines further this goal, what types of architectural expression, use of materials, etc. may be appropriate while still holding true to this vision? • The Urban Design Guide Plan and Design and Design Considerations —Where do these guidelines currently apply, where should they apply? Future re- development potential of properties that currently exceed allowable height, GRFA, etc. — A number of properties in VV that currently exceed zoning standards are considered potential candidates for redevelopment. Historically, properties in Vail have increased in size when re- developed. How can Town encourage re- development while at same time maintain the scale of buildings in the Village? • Landmark Designation —Are there improvements in the Village that warrant designation of "landmark" status? • Specific Elements of Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations — Eleven specific elements of the UDGP have been identified that may warrant refinement /clarification. On April 1, 2014, the Vail Town Council received and update on the progress of the project and directed staff to move forward and complete Phase 1 of the project. On May 12, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing to revisit the project and bring new members up to the current level of knowledge. There was a discussion regarding the selected comparable communities and the fact that they were not ski communities. It was explained why the comparable communities were selected. Staff was specifically asked to speak with Carmel, California to discuss their tools to maintain character, bulk, and mass in the commercial core. A discussion with the planning director revealed that the primary factor limiting control development and redevelopment was water supply. There is no additional water resource so no land use can become more intense. Zoning regulations and a historic building inventory/registry also provide for significant restriction and review. III. RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission listens to the presentation, asks questions, provides input and forwards a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to proceed forward with an Town of Vail Page 6 effort to address identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan as an outcome of the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project, an initiative to examine the Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines applicable to Vail Village. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval to move forward with the examination and implementation of potential amendments to the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations, staff recommends the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to proceed forward with the Vail Village Character Area Preservation initiative to examine and implement approaches to address the identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the application and implementation Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations." IV. ATTACHMENTS A. PEC Power Point Presentation from March 11, 2013 B. Vail Village Master Plan C. Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan Town of Vail Page 7 4 w (4 a a z 4 L N d � V � m O U Cl) d Y L O —U w >a a 0 V D m 13 0 Fm Cn O O F- .C/) x LU Cn Cn O U O I N N N Q O D Y i C6 C6 J 11 ^V 1! W Q C� D O O -C . m 4-0 W 4-0 O n 4-0 ^� W E 0 ^O W O 0 O Cv �E O CZ O s= O O U O Z . 0- ^L V Q U � C6 � O IZ- (/) U}' s= ca Cv E Cy U W O 4-0 U_ U � � U Q a) c- . C/) 11 a �J a b U N d Y cu L —U w >a }, .O Cn Cn =3 E U O Cn Y i C6 C6 J 11 ^V 1! W Q C� D O O -C . m 4-0 W 4-0 O n 4-0 ^� W E 0 ^O W O 0 O Cv �E O CZ O s= O O U O Z . 0- ^L V Q U � C6 � O IZ- (/) U}' s= ca Cv E Cy U W O 4-0 U_ U � � U Q a) c- . C/) 11 a �J a b U N d Y cu L —U w >a O E O U .v � 0 Y i C6 C6 J 11 ^V 1! W Q C� D O O -C . m 4-0 W 4-0 O n 4-0 ^� W E 0 ^O W O 0 O Cv �E O CZ O s= O O U O Z . 0- ^L V Q U � C6 � O IZ- (/) U}' s= ca Cv E Cy U W O 4-0 U_ U � � U Q a) c- . C/) 11 a �J a b U N d Y cu L —U w >a (n O 0 Fm 0 N ■ W W �1I M J C CD cn N D c� N N C CD 0 a �J a a ti a z b F- L N d � V � m O U N d Y L c O -U w >a yj r,m- ylbl 0 M-17 Cf) 0 0 LJ > a LA- 4= F- Cl) 2.2 o LU >a 4=0 U ■ C ■ w M rm 2T -t . to N' > LJ > a LA- 4= F— o >LU a U) 4-0 U) U) LL u) n rm 2T -t . to N' > LJ > a LA- 4= F— o >LU a (1) a .N d 0 L () (D N Jc: V♦ V! O 0 }+ L n ' W • V♦ p C: CU O � OF ■ rn nv /, W C (D V! O ^L W . — O Ali J W QL U U) c� J 4-0 U U El . a �J I a b F- � .y U N d Y L c Q -U w >a 0 x� a (1) FM t� a� r J}k�� ji i f ET ii E L 2 r J -�LiCi P o� W LLJ E�-- L2 I i I I In LIR�jl v W Y l_ W J _O I � N N � 4- U N � N � N � N O i � O N +� Ul > O O Q o � o= o 4-, > �U�� O./ / O �I 4-0 •> E i }, >+ Q W cn w d U O N O 6 (D U O_ U 'i '� s 'tn N Co E N O U Cl) O m i Q, O N (1) M 70 (0 (1) -U m 'cc w U) N OUM. Lo >a N C y � R �7 � xx a m 5�1 ET ii E L 2 r J -�LiCi P o� W LLJ E�-- L2 I i I I In LIR�jl v W Y l_ W J _O I � N N � 4- U N � N � N � N O i � O N +� Ul > O O Q o � o= o 4-, > �U�� O./ / O �I 4-0 •> E i }, >+ Q W cn w d U O N O 6 (D U O_ U 'i '� s 'tn N Co E N O U Cl) O m i Q, O N (1) M 70 (0 (1) -U m 'cc w U) N OUM. Lo >a � � � � � ._ � � � � F z � _ } . »» �.« }2 >22y ■ a � �< �\ \ � � LA- C14� � � � 2 m k � § 0 R $ Q Q m ■ o g R -U > a. O L 13 O Al a .N d 0 L O .N U) W 0. O U4 Fj U L i O (a U. U cn Cn Z- Cn CD 0 � � UUJ= W CD / W U) L N d � V � Cn U N Z- Lj- / b F- L N d � V � cLC O U N d Y L O —U w >a O L 13 O A V i J m i LM V 4� s V El N O O C6 N 4-0 m E N N O O Q E O c� 0 0 U E 0 ^n W C� U C� LL �g cn O O cn O U c� cn c� O 0 R k VY LZ Z- l N C6 cn _ a C6 cn 4-0 cn C cn O cn E C: 4-0 E O LJJ cn (n E O O '> cn cn W co# C� m o N s n U L U '� �o O U }, m 00 D Q J EU) a. L U) U O C6 � O }, � O O O O ^� QL N � LO O C6 O C6 0 � E U � � � co L U) U O C6 � O }, � O O O O ^� QL N � LO N C6 L U) U O Co � O O QL � C6 O � � O � O � � O a) cli I U 4-0 r W }+ W E U 2 Co O O U O O O >% a) 4-0 O O � m x > G w ;5 k# a b F- .o s y U � L � o —U w >a O Cn U D O N U O I L J . W Q 0- C� D O O . W 4-0 O n 4-0 W E 0 ^O W O 0 O a) -t O 0- O E O O U O Z . . a �J a a z 4 L N d � V � m U N d Y L Q —U w >a n V ^L Q 4-0 U � C6 � O U) U}' c� a) E a) 4-0 U w O 4 U_ U � U � Q O 0- Cn . a �J a a z 4 L N d � V � m U N d Y L Q —U w >a N L J �r I w J' (4 .y a ti O a ti L N d � V � m O U Cl) d Y L O —U w >a (1) Y LM m E cn ce 0 a ce ce 0 z C/) F- LU LU w F- C/) ZA w (4 Lj- Cl) 04 m 0 U) Q LU CL N L J cn w v a cn 0 z Q w V J a. a �J wl d a L •O t4 N U Cl) m Y L t4 p -U W >a U) M�d LM m E '72 j ai I a Z� i - L9 ig a LA- 4= F- Cl) 04 m 0 Cl) LU CL N Y L J 1 4 - wl� d � �--- -"fie f' Ai O �J e �cn a 3 a 0 V 7 Z`1 l a LA- a z b F- L N d � i .O t4 N U Cl) o d Y L —U 'c� w (1) Y LM m E 0,111, 7r7- 77- > > o ELI a LA- cz am �t an F- Cl) 04 m 0 Cl) o W LU N Y L J O O O W 0 QL C` • i ca W L a) O U) U) c� 0 a� a� s•1 0 4-0 ^U) W W QL W 4-0 i U) O 4- U) O 0 s•1 23 O 0— 0 W U ca QL O U O QL 0 a� c� c6 H ^L W O ►E U O vi a) N c6 N 4-0 W 0 L O . i O U a) O E o (D ^O, O W Q Q �O 0 0 w a a b .o o s y U � L • W >a O U U U ° 0- QL o � o U) O_ ^U W C` • i ca W L a) O U) U) c� 0 a� a� s•1 0 4-0 ^U) W W QL W 4-0 i U) O 4- U) O 0 s•1 23 O 0— 0 W U ca QL O U O QL 0 a� c� c6 H ^L W O ►E U O vi a) N c6 N 4-0 W 0 L O . i O U a) O E o (D ^O, O W Q Q �O 0 0 w a a b .o o s y U � L • W >a N Y L J W 0 H Y U O J U w (4 a a z a ti L N V � U Cl) o a� Y L —U w >a N Y L J W L � Oi, V O L O O •> L ^, E �--+ CU •� 4-0 4-0 4-0 W a a U _ O � O • C6 U ° W U •V C6 O � E > Rio O Cl) C6 Co p i m0 U) I—Z co U) 4-0 V, VJ s y a� }, 4-0 0 c� O . W n/ • • • >a 4-0 2 am t� 0 (1) LM (1) Ja J MM 71 U-5 a LA- 4= F- Cl) C14 m 0 Cl) o LU a. 2 am t� 0 (1) LM (1) Ja , J"n F 4*-' Ii Ar bL Vim] U O rr a LA- 4= F- 04 m 0 Cl) (1) 0) -j� o W L.0 2 am t� 0 (1) LM (1) Ja a wl C14 m 0 0 LU a. ■ 0 a t� 0 (1) L s ob- U w n L O 4- U) c O U) \I 1/ 4-0 O O -0 QL QL m n V r) W 4-0 O V! m QL �U .QL 4-0 O C- U) C*-- (D C6 O U) W U) W O —0 \ QL QL m O D CD W 0 U) a) E a) a) 4-0 C**-� �-j O O N N N 4-0 c6 W a �J IdOWN a 0 0 F- � .y U N d Y L W >a d if X�I j d d d N d lot d O L 0 0 0 U " A M �J LL d 4 H i+ Cl) o v � U � L W >a d ,X d d d N d lot d O L 0 0 0 U " P l N't, N r� �1 , i w (4 d G b F- r.+ v � U Cl) o d Y L W >a i p E O �_ �. 4-0 4-0 7E7) �--+ > � _ a) 0 � C6 O O cL O = 0 0 QL :3 O p O .. t. O > 0 O O � M -0 O QL O }' IZZ L U O U) CO C6 -- 0_0 O E m� O m U a) ._ O E •� 0 a) U L O > 0 0,5 > -0 O 0) 0 4-0 CNI. Q •EZ p •cn }, O — O V 0 0 0 U O p� L .0 0 U O D U p 0 O U) U) U) O = >a • C� co to E a m O a) > a) 4� � O U DC .� U) CL O L— � O L V! A r -i IZ a) O ' � C6 O L O � 0 O Q QL O >% 4-0 V i CL LZ x Z 0- w Z- - 4-0 . 4-0 4-0 a) �_ E O a) 0- 4-0 O U C6 a) > � a) O }, a) O a) 4-0 `u F- O � U a) (1) 4� O O '0 � C6 O Q >-, 0 W � >a 0) • • • LM (2) LM m Ja Al LM U (1) 4=0 ■ U LM El LIP w (4 Lj- Cl) 04 m 0 Cl) O LU CL L V L m s Al L V s L C6 O cn i El O L- (D N O U W Q N .� o i � U O W Z �> O U) O E O C6 E c /O /1 • • • w a a b Cl) m ,o s y U � Cl) L W >a U) O U U) a � O N � U � � O 4 N � U +� U •- > N c� N E O U E 'C O E •n m �_ cn •� 0 4-0 > •n E > i o 0 a� }, Q (� L cn C6 " > •n a L U 4-0 L E }+ > > •> C6 O cn i El O L- (D N O U W Q N .� o i � U O W Z �> O U) O E O C6 E c /O /1 • • • w a a b Cl) m ,o s y U � Cl) L W >a L L m s V c� L U ■ s U L a . a �J a a LA- b F- L N d � V � i C U � m Y L Q -U w >a L L m Ja Al L U OF L El rr: a �J a a LA- 4= z b F- a.+ L N d � V � i C U Cl) m Y L Q -U w >a L L m Ja Al L U OF U L El w (4 Lj- 0 z b F- r.+ L N d � V � m O U Cl) d Y L O -U w >a L V L m s Al L s v L a� LM D .x LU L O U O N >, 'a U 4-0 U) O O C6 � N > O CL W O U) = m Lu -r- 0 E `N O L.f_ LIJ • O Q .S Cn J C6 C6 U U C6 nV ,! W c� c� LZ U) N E .O U) N 4-0 n� W nE W O O cn c� O U z; J a b F- Cl) (D ' CO U) `) > a) m s Cl) \ O E U � 0 _O U U)LLmO O Cn w >a L L m s Al i V s V L U W 0- O U) O U) I u N N N N *. (,, D � o U N � rl a) EL o _O C: O O � • cn _ •O • ---i .(D C6 E O cn cn E cn U N Q cn m N E O U) O L O a) a� c� O C6 W cn O U c� L U i C6 I • Cam• 0 U C6 �� a (4 Q F- A m ,o s y U � Cl) o L —U W >a a C� D O N C d d W V V cn U) ♦, .o L x 0 w '� rl ry � �r s ��✓ y 1 w, a �J a ti a z a� 04 m O s y U � Cl) 0) L o W >a a t� 0 0 N d d W V V 4� cn N O L O cQ ft U) O .U) ca QL X LLI L.L • N U O H 4-0 W L U Y U N U) =3 C: _0 O .0 Q- V 00 Z • • O .U) O E O L I..L • N U C6 O ca m a) 4-0 ^O a_ a_ (D 0 • 0 O O 4-0 .M� W • w (4 a a a� 04 m ,o s y U � L W >a a t� 0 4 O N d d W u ■� cn l ��, in '� r Uv f �J ov ;�,L• /.` C as "tl m cEaLmN � mod•. ii N.. �.� a a._m.. ryyi ou 3�a a•ro, ^� dam ;D'2 ° �d 6. r6 0 va 3S k2 tp-$ q � £ �-15 LA- G 3wm� merry �`�7a�� 1 r r 4 k L mC14 � / � na C -�� O / �/ r �� °�� ����� s N =ter _ ao� FR�v�Q °nom () cn , - w U c L, � a o L m N a b maa�Am' V LU F- ae�,. ::o`sQ � ¢�s�y� Woo a C7 D O N d d WI V V 4� cn O L L O cQ ft O C i • .r _' e �y i gr a �J I 1L d 4 s y U � Cl) o L W >a am t� 0 0 a� a� (1) E A-, a ti Cl) 04 m 0 (1) Cl) o LU CL O Cf) Cl) A-, a ti Cl) 04 m 0 (1) Cl) o LU CL a C7 D O N d d W V V cn � L O O N � � N (6 � N � • L (6 � N � N N � O N � •� cn o � Xa� CL O U T � � W 2:N�•ca (3) O m j 010 Z; i 0 �, N O O � � V L C13 � � U) �� U c (6 � 0 w � co J � L L.L U � L O O N � � N (6 � N � • L (6 � N � N N � O N � •� cn o � Xa� CL O U T � � W 2:N�•ca (3) O m j 010 Z; ca 0 �, _U) � O (6 � w cl L.L U N _0 O J J Z; ca �, � O (6 N � 4 � N � U) > O)O +- N X N d 70 O Z3 C: o o C-) N O N U � � N �+ -- •° Q 4-j C cn U ai 4-j Y cn T o > U J �� O am 0 U) E cn 0 N xi, 41 a ti Cl) 04 m 0 o LU CL 0 CO 0 4.0 4) 0 N xi, 41 a ti Cl) 04 m 0 o LU CL a t� 0 0 (1) a� a� w v a� cn O L � L CZ 1. O :w 1 4.0 J 4) 0 t w kl�# a ti a z a F-- i N d � m .O S N U � Cl) 0) L o W >a a C7 D O N d d WI V V 4� cn -1--+ O U W M M O M M }' O N C6 �, O Co 4-0 E ca � � O E5 o O m O O O E 0-0 Z) z N O C`7 � U O C6 O L = O V co cn m co U -1--+ O U W M M O M M }' O N C6 �, O Co 4-0 E ca � � O E5 o O m O O O E 0-0 Z) z N C� W C`7 � O � O L C� • • �J W cn O U •� cn W U L O O cn O_ •L � .— M a �• L O j L O � N _O _O m O m O O O = Q = in 0 O O L ' w >a • • a C7 D O N d d W V V cn C C O p W O C N-E N 'j V mom' ..+ �_ y V 0 Q N O T N N L C L U7 fLll Q�j N ILII N N V i UI O Of -6 W p -O C Q Q1 rt N IJII C N Itl C N T b L N N J p_ V p C _0 2 V .L.+ V m s a> LU v N p m W Z IG N Ol N Q 7 N 0 10 l9 r N V 42 Ca O 15 E Z n � V m m w v n E v C –_ c �ti .2 ro c L W _ 2 J O1 N -p > .'.+ •— O _ v vQi uJi n v v v n 4 a) m i � o � ic. N •U � N � N � � Co CO V Ca N co N •- a Co LU CO CO L N Co Q W V V! O � V • • w } d b F- m •o � N s m U Cl) a� Y L cC p •(� W >a a C� D 4 O N d d W A V to v c L � 0 � O a �J a z a L ,o s y U � mCl) L o -U w >a a D O N C d d W W v cn a� c� cn L 0 0 Al U) 0 m QL U) stoo U • Z% a LA- a z 4 m O U Cl) o d Y L —U w >a (1) Cl) x Z -U O u 0 O 4-0 O c� QL Z) • W ^V! W W }+ L O � O U O � O � O � U C6 o U �w 4-0 O U_ O 4-0 Co > W O • a �J a b m .o s y U � L � o -U W >a U w n U O E 4-0 O 4--a :z O 0 -O a) a) O O Se > O O O a) -0 c� O • O H a �J a b m .o s y U � L � o -U W >a 1 w (4 Lj- 0 z b F- r.+ L N d � V � M O U Cl) d Y L O —U W w >a w Lj- (4 0 z b F- r.+ L N d � V � m O U d Cl) Y L O —U W w >a Ad Name: 10362537A Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33 Vail Daily PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO } }SS. COUNTY OF EAGLE } I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice and advertisement as requested. The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium, only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 7/11/2014 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 7/11/2014 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 07/29/2014. General Man ager/Publisher/Editor Vail Daily Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 07/29/2014. � 2m.&& 9. -V-� Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public My Commission expires: November 1, 2015 �pRY PUe/ ' PAMELA J. SCHULTZ 9�� COt -ARP$ My Commismn Expires 11/0112015 THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12 -3 -6, Vail Town Code, on July 28, 2014 at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. A request for a final review of variances from Sec- tions 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12- 6D -11, Park- ing, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bell- flower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140018) Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by MJ Mueller Co Planner: Warren Campbell A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special Devel- opment District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved de- velopment plan for the Cornerstone site to facili- tate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive /Un- platted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140019) Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence The applications and information about the propos- als are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Develop- ment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend site visits. Please call 970 - 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon re- quest, with 24 -hour notification. Please call 970 - 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im- paired, for information. Published July 11, 2014 in the Vail Daily. (10362537) Ad Name: 10405643A Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33 Vail Daily PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO } }SS. COUNTY OF EAGLE } I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice and advertisement as requested. The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium, only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 7/25/2014 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 7/25/2014 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 09/24/2014. General Man ager/Publisher/Editor Vail Daily Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 09/24/2014. � 2m.&& 9. -V-� Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public My Commission expires: November 1, 2015 �pRY PUe/ ' PAMELA J. SCHULTZ 9�� COt -ARP$ My Commismn Expires 11/0112015 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMIS- SION July 28, 2014 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visit: none 15 minutes 1.A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Require- ments, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of- way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140018) Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by MJ Mueller Co. Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: MOTION: SECOND:VOTE: CONDITION(S): 90 minutes 2.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on approaches to address identified ele- ments to ensure the special character of Vail Vil- lage is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan as an out- come of the Vail Village Character Area Preserva- tion project, an initiative to examine the Town's cur- rent regulations, design standards and guidelines applicable to Vail Village. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun As- sociates, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 3.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special Devel- opment District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved de- velopment plan for the Cornerstone site to facili- tate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive /Un- platted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140019) Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014 MOTION: SECOND:VOTE: 4.Approval of July 14, 2014 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 5.Information Update 6.Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The applications and information about the propos- als are available for public inspection during regu- lar office hours at the Town of Vail Community De- velopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orienta- tion and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Develop- ment Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be re- lied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional in- formation. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im- paired, for information. Community Development Department Published July 25, 2014 in the Vail Daily. (10405643)