HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-0728 PECTOWN OF VAft� PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
July 28, 2014 at 1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visit: none
15 minutes
1. A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12 -6D -9, Site
Coverage, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition
and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955
Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC140018)
Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by MJ Mueller Co.
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
90 minutes
2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on approaches to address identified
elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced
through the Vail Village Master Plan as an outcome of the Vail Village Character Area
Preservation project, an initiative to examine the Town's current regulations, design standards
and guidelines applicable to Vail Village.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special
Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment
Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved development plan for the
Cornerstone site to facilitate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at
1300 Westhaven Drive /Unplatted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC140019)
Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates
Planner: Jonathan Spence
ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
4. Approval of July 14, 2014 minutes
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5. Information Update
Page 1
6. Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning
and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please
call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published July 25, 2014 in the Vail Daily.
Page 2
TOWN OF VAft� PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
July 28, 2014 at 1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visit: none
15 minutes
1. A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12 -6D -9, Site
Coverage, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition
and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955
Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC140018)
Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by MJ Mueller Co.
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0
CONDITION(S):
1. The variance approvals are contingent on the Applicant obtaining Town of Vail
approval of a design review application for the proposed additions.
2. The Applicant shall submit a revocable right -of -way permit to Public Works for
all improvements located within the Bellflower Drive right -of -way prior to
requesting final public works inspections.
3. The Applicant shall remove the kitchen in the lower level second unit to be in
full compliance with the Vail Town Code prior to requesting final planning
inspections.
4. The Applicant shall trim the large existing evergreen tree in the front yard so
that no limbs hang below 7 feet as measured from the ground, upward, prior
to the requesting final planning inspections.
Warren Campbell gave a presentation pursuant to the memorandum.
Commissioner Cartin asked why there was a condition regarding the limbing of the evergreen to
a height of 7 feet.
Warren explained that it had to do with vehicular safety and sight visibility lines.
Commissioner Cleveland asked about the difference between a kitchen and a kitchenette.
Warren explained the definition of a kitchenette.
Page 1
Commissioner Martin encouraged the applicant to replace all the existing siding on the south
elevation as it was showing its age and likely beyond repair.
Carl Mueller stated he would convey that message to Mr. Peters.
Commissioner Pratt mentioned that the plans showed a single bathroom for three bedrooms and
that there should not be a future variance application to incorporate a bathroom within the
setbacks.
There was no public comment.
Commissioner Cartin asked if a condition should be added to address the siding issue. It was
agreed that it was not necessary because it would be addressed during the DRB review.
90 minutes
2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on approaches to address identified
elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced
through the Vail Village Master Plan as an outcome of the Vail Village Character Area
Preservation project, an initiative to examine the Town's current regulations, design standards
and guidelines applicable to Vail Village.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Recommendation of approval
MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Hopkins VOTE: 6 -0 -0
Warren Campbell gave a presentation pursuant to the memorandum. He also spoke to his
conversation with Carmel, CA, per the direction provided at the previous Commission hearing.
Tom Braun stated the discussion today would center around the development review process
and the five topics for further evaluation. He proceeded to give a presentation per his Power
Point.
Expansion of the Application of the Urban Design Guide Plan
Tom Braun introduced the topic.
Commissioner Cartin mentioned the difference between the "should" and "shalls" and how the
revised UDGP might address that difference.
Commissioner Kurz spoke to a concern regarding how the expansion of the UDGP would /could
be applied to buildings that have already redeveloped. How and what effect would there be.
Believed it was important to bring as much of the area under control of the plan. Suggested the
Village Core may have differing requirements.
Commissioner Cleveland expressed reservations about expanding the area for the UDGP. He
stated that when the Council decided to move forward with this project the scale of the Village
was the issue of concern. It was about the Village Core and how to preserve its uniqueness in
terms of architecture and scale. The lack of color has always been of concern. There should be
an ability to have differing neighborhoods. He mentioned that Meadow Drive has turned out well
and any overlay expanding the restricting design is not the way to go.
Page 2
Commissioner Pratt said that the UDGP should be expanded and that the peripheral areas
should tie into the core. Having a small scale village surround by New York scale buildings is not
the way to go. Steel and stone did not make Vail famous. He discussed how one or two bad
snow years causes a shift in thinking during the review of development applications which tends
to turn to revenue generation as a key consideration. The documents being discussed need to
provide long term guidance for town councils, planning and environmental commission, and
design review boards, as there can be strong and weak boards implementing the regulations.
Commissioner Cleveland statted that if the UDGP limits were to be expanded the incorporation
of strong language define various sub -areas and what is appropriate.
Landmarks.
Tom Braun introduced the topic.
Warren Campbell raised a question regarding Vail's history in American ski heritage and the
potential to preserve that heritage.
Commissioner Hopkins described scenarios where drywall was holding up joists and studs when
describing some of the initial construction in town. When Vail became a destination resort it
changed everything with regard to guest expectations.
Commissioner Cartin expressed that scale and the quaint feeling is most important to preserve
Commissioner Cleveland discussed the significance of the Gorsuch clock tower. Let's not
hamstring potential development, but let's preserve those landmarks that are quintessential Vail.
Vail doesn't have a lengthy history like other communities (mining, agricultural). 50 years is a
short period of time. Vail sells service and at the current price point guests have certain
expectations of quality. He was not sure the battle to identify structures as landmarks needed to
be fought anymore.
Commissioners Webb, Kurz and Pratt agreed. Pratt expressed concern legislating the
preservation of open space that is privately owned.
Commissioner Kurz expressed the need to capitalize on certain locations, encouraging
developers to build landmarks.
Warren Campbell asked if anything should be done today to establish structures worth saving in
the future?
Commissioner Pratt said to encourage landmarks could be problematic, as landmarks to past
generations have a lesser meaning to young generations.
Tom Braun then spoke to the mechanisms other communities have developed in order to
preserve their character. The communities of Santa Fe, Park Cirty and Santa Barabra were
discussed in regards to what they do to preserve and protect their communities and how that
may be applicable in Vail.
Commissioner Cleveland stated that real estate was a commodity and what people desired
changes over time and therefore any adopted document should allow for change.
Page 3
Commissioner Kurz said he was still struggling will how to define landmarks.
Tom Braun suggested another approach to addressing landmarks could be a discussion of scale
and architecture that needs to be protects.
Non - conforming Properties and Redevelopment
Tom Braun introduced the topic. He identified scale as potentially most important factor to
include into the UDGP.
Commissioner Pratt said the Covered Bridge building presented an impractical application of the
60/40 height limit. He stated the need for a pragmatic approach to regulating height. Maybe a
10% variation is warranted. Pratt then discussed the need for constant upkeep for buildings.
Commissioner Hopkins agreed and added a concern regarding vacant properties.
Commissioner Cleveland stated that it is not the government's role to regulate upkeep.
Commissioner Cleveland thought the proposal presented by Tom were appropriate.
Tom then discussed architectural character and the lack of articulation within the UDGP in this
regard when compared to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
Commissioner Pratt mentioned compatibility as an important factor worth considering a
development proposal. Sometimes bad projects have been approved due to a lack of stringent
criteria.
Commissioner Cartin used the Wall Street Building as an example of how a project can change
between a PEC approval and a DRB approval based upon each groups review elements. He
agreed with the idea of establishing criteria which were focused on height variances in the
Village.
Architectural Character and Specific Elements of the UDGP
Tom Braun introduced the topic.
Several PEC members agreed that compatibility is important as discussed by Tom.
Commissioner Pratt stated than more compatibility language may provide for enforceable
regulations while allowing for flexibility. The Village does not need guidelines and standards as
detailed as the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
Commissioner Kurz mentioned the need to upgrade the graphics within the UDGP and define
the architectural character elements desired. He also spoke to the need to forward
recommendations to other boards regarding projects. There needs to be an effective tool to
understanding the rationale when Council overturns a PEC action.
Commissioner Pratt discussed how Swiss, Austrian, and Tyrolean architecture are all very
different. He added the new fad is mountain contemporary. When need to decide and clarify
Vail's architecture.
Page 4
Tom Braun then discussed identifying opportunities to expand retail
Commissioner Pratt stated the streetscape in some areas (1 Willow Bridge Rd) as the result of
expanded retail resulted in an expanse of paving without and softscape. There should have
been some landscaping incorporated into the redesign.
Commissioner Cartin cited examples of island planters that work within Town and allowing for
private property to propose planters on Town property as well.
Tom Braun then discussed transparency /windows. There is a lot language in this section that is
ambiguous. It needs to be more definitive. Tom went on to discuss landscaping and sun /shade.
Commissioner Pratt mentioned Arrabelle as a poor example of excessive shading in the winter
on the north side adjacent to Lift House Lodge. Others agreed that it is one of the few mistakes
with the Lionshead redevelopment.
Commissioner Cleveland suggested no additional shading of a street should be permitted.
Tom Braun mentioned dining decks and patios as features of the Village worth preserving due to
their contribution to street life. The Commissioners echoed the importance of the deck and
patios. Tom also identified public plazas as another important element of the Village that should
be identified as such in the UDGP. Commission Pratt agreed.
Tom Braun stated that rooftop equipment should also be addressed in the UDGP. Pam Hopkins
said noise needs to be regulated in the UDGP as well.
Tom then mentioned a few housekeeping items —the roles of the boards, calculating height,
updating maps and graphics.
Commissioner Cleveland asked about the next steps.
Warren Campbell explained that this recommendation would be taken forward to the Town
Council and if there was agreement to move forward with a process of exploring amendments
staff would propose a budget and time line for such an effort.
3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special
Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment
Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved development plan for the
Cornerstone site to facilitate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at
1300 Westhaven Drive /Unplatted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC140019)
Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates
Planner: Jonathan Spence
ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014
MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6 -0 -0
4. Approval of July 14, 2014 minutes
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0
5. Information Update
Page 5
6. Adjournment
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning
and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional
information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please
call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published July 25, 2014 in the Vail Daily.
Page 6
0 . )rowN of vain
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: July 28, 2014
SUBJECT: A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12 -6D -6,
Setbacks, Section 12 -6D -9, Site Coverage, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking,
and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to
Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential
addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the
public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail
Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140018)
Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented by MJ Mueller Co.
Planner: Warren Campbell
SUMMARY
The Applicant, Alan and Francine Peters, represented by Carl Mueller, is
requesting variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking,
and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter
12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition and remodel
with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at
2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends approval, with conditions, subject to the findings noted in Section
VIII of this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The Applicant is requesting variances from Section 12 -6D -6 Setbacks, for the front
and west side setbacks to allow for a new one -car garage with master bedroom
above, a covered entry porch. To accomplish the proposed additions a request for
a site coverage variance has been included. The final variance from Section 14 -3-
Town of Vail Page 1
2F, Other Requirements, is to allow for 2 vehicle parking spaces to be partially
located within the Town owned, Bellflower Drive, right -of -way.
The request for a variance to Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, is no longer need due to
the elimination of the second dwelling unit on the property. The applicant proposes
to remove the kitchen to comply with Town Code to create a wet bar in the
recreation room.
A vicinity map (Attachment A), written request from the applicant (Attachment B)
and plans dated June 30, 2014 (Attachment C) are attached for reference.
On April 28, 2008 the applicant received variance approvals to setbacks and
parking requirements, similar to this current proposal. The previous approvals
have since expired. Therefore, the applicant is returning to the Planning and
Environmental Commission to request the approval of a slightly modified proposal.
In the time period since 2008 the applicant pursued the construction of the project
as approved, however, only completed those portions of the plan to expand the
living and dining rooms into the west setback.
The applicant's current request is slightly modified to remove the second unit on
the property, which was previously going to become a Type I EHU which included
a site coverage increase of 5 %. The proposal to remove the second units and not
place a deed restriction on the unit has resulted in a request for a site coverage
variance. Additionally, the dimensions and area of the proposed garage have
been reduced from 462 to 289 square feet.
The descriptions of the variances requested are as follows
1. Front Setback: The applicant is requesting to vary the front setback from
the required 20 feet to a range of 9.5 feet to 13 feet to allow for a one -car
garage addition. A new front entry includes 6 square feet of GRFA within
the front setback. The roof covering over the entry extends 3 feet into the
required 16 foot setback for roof elements. (Covered entries are allowed to
encroach into the setback 4 feet). Approximately 220 square feet, of the
289 square foot garage is proposed within the front and west side setbacks.
Approximately 6 square feet of GRFA for the new front entry is proposed
within the front setback.
2. West Side Setback: The applicant is requesting to vary the west side
setback from the required 15 feet to a range of 6 feet to 7 feet to allow for a
one -car garage addition and master bedroom over a portion of the garage.
Approximately 220 square feet of the 289 square foot garage is proposed
within the front and west side setbacks. Approximately 110 square feet of
the proposed master bedroom above the garage, is proposed within the
west side setback.
3. Site Coverage: The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum
allowable site coverage by 123 square feet (1.4 %).
Town of Vail Page 2
4. Parking in the right -of -way: The Applicant is requesting a variance from
the requirement that all required parking be located on site. Two of the
proposed surface parking spaces encroach up to 13 ft. into the Bellflower
Drive right -of -way.
III. BACKGROUND
The original plat for this property was recorded in 1970 under Eagle County
jurisdiction. The existing structure was constructed in 1977 under Eagle County
regulations requiring side setbacks of five feet. When the property was annexed
into the Town of Vail under Ordinance 15 in 1987 it was zoned Two - Family
Primary/ Secondary Residential (PS) District with a minimum front setback of 20
feet and side yard of 15 feet.
On November 2, 1983, the Applicant received approval to construct a secondary
deed restricted unit on the lot. At that time, the Town Zoning regulations required
that one half (1/2) of the required parking be enclosed. The Applicant received a
variance from this requirement. The variance was granted based on the difficulty
of building a garage on the site, specifically the Planning and Environmental
Commission found, "the garage would tend to overcrowd the lot and would impair
the common open space between the residence and the residence to the west."
On March 26, 2001, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved similar
setback and parking variances for this property.
On February 7, 2002, the Design Review Board approved the design review
application associated with the approved variances from March 26, 2001.
On November 24, 2003, the Planning and Environmental Commission again
approved similar setback and parking variances for this property. This proposal
varies in that the applicant has removed the previously requested den and laundry
room and reconfigured the proposed garage, master bedroom, living room, and
dining room additions. This approval has since expired.
On April 28, 2008, the Planning and Environmental Commission again approved
similar setback and parking variances for this property. The approved plans are
attached for reference (Attachment D).
IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff believes that following provisions of the Vail Land Use Plan and the Vail
Town Code are relevant to the review of this proposal: Vail Land Use Plan (in part)
Town of Vail Page 3
CHAPTER II: LAND USE PLAN GOALS / POLICIES (in part)
The goals articulated here reflect the desires of the citizenry as expressed through
the series of public meetings that were held throughout the project. A set of initial
goals were developed which were then substantially revised after different types of
opinions were brought out in the second meeting. The goal statements were
developed to reflect a general consensus once the public had had the opportunity
to reflect on the concepts and ideas initially presented. The goal statements were
then revised through the review process with the Task Force, the Planning and
Environmental Commission and Town Council and now represent policy guidelines
in the review process for new development proposals. These goal statements
should be used in conjunction with the adopted Land
Use Plan map, in the evaluation of any development proposal.
The goal statements which are reflected in the design of the proposed Plan are as
follows..
General Growth / Development
1.1. Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the
visitor and the permanent resident.
1.3. The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever
possible.
1.12. Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing
developed areas (infill areas).
5. Residential
5.1. Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing,
platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist.
5.4. Residential growth should keep pace with the market place demands for a
full range of housing types.
CHAPTER VI, SECTION 4, PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORIES (in part)
LDR Low Density Residential
This category includes single- family detached homes and two - family dwelling
units. Density of development within this category would typically not exceed 3
structures per buildable acres. Also within this area would be private recreation
facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools and club houses for the use of
Town of Vail Page 4
residents of the area. Institutional/ public uses permitted would include churches,
fire stations, and parks and open space related facilities.
Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code (in part)
Section 12 -2 Definitions
SETBACK: The distance from a lot or site line, creek or stream measured
horizontally to a line or location within the lot or site which establishes the
permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site.
SETBACK LINE. A line or location within a lot or site which establishes the
permitted location of uses, structures, or buildings on the site.
SETBACK LINE, FRONT. The setback line extending the full width of the site
parallel to and measured from the front lot or site line.
SETBACK LINE, SIDE. The setback line extending from the front setback line to
the rear setback line parallel to and measured from the side lot or site line.
Section 12 -6D Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential (PS) District (in
part)
12 -6D -1: PURPOSE.
The two - family primary /secondary residential district is intended to provide sites for
single- family residential uses or two - family residential uses in which one unit is a
larger primary residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment,
together with such public facilities as may appropriately be located in the same
district. The two - family primary /secondary residential district is intended to ensure
adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with
single- family and two - family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential
qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site development standards.
12 -6D -6. SETBACKS.
In the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum front setback shall be
twenty feet (20), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15), and the
minimum rear setback shall be fifteen feet (15).
12- 6D -11: PARKING:
Off - street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Title.
Section 12 -17 Variances (in part)
12 -17 -1. PURPOSE.
A. Reasons For Seeking Variance. In order to prevent or to lessen such
practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the
Town of Vail Page 5
VA
objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical
difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape,
or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon, from
topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity;
or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the
immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the Applicant of strict or literal
compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance.
B. Development Standards Excepted. Variances may be granted only with
respect to the development standards prescribed for each district, including
lot area and site dimensions, setbacks, distances between buildings, height,
density control, building bulk control, site coverage, usable open space,
landscaping and site development, and parking and loading requirements; or
with respect to the provisions of chapter 11 of this title, governing physical
development on a site.
C. Use Regulations Not Affected: The power to grant variances does not extend
to the use regulations prescribed for each district because the flexibility
necessary to avoid results inconsistent with the objectives of this title is
provided by chapter 16, "Conditional Use Permits'; and by section 12 -3 -7,
"Amendment" of this title.
SITE ANALYSIS
Address: 2955 Bellflower Drive
Legal Description: Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Zoning: Two - family Primary/Secondary Residential District
Land Use Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
Current Land Use: Two - Family Residential
Geological Hazards: 100 year Floodplain
Development Standard Required
Min. Lot Area: 15,000 sq. ft.
Min. Setbacks
Front: 20'
Sides: 15' (east)
15' (west)
Rear: 50' Gore Creek
Max. Building Height: 33'
Max. GRFA:
Primary 2,380.2 sq. ft.
Secondary not permitted*
Total 3,971 sq. ft.
Existing Proposed
8,633.59 sq. ft. No change
14.4'
9.5- 14'
12'
no change
20.5'
6' - 7'
62.5'
no change
25' No change
2,047 sq. ft. 2,209 sq. ft.
583 sq. ft. eliminated
2,630 sq. ft. 2,980 sq. ft.
Town of Vail Page 6
Max. Site Coverage: 1,727 sq. ft. (20 %) 1,362 sq. ft. (15.7 %) 1,850 sq. ft. (21.4 %)
Min. Landscape Area: 4,743 sq. ft. (55 %) 6,510 sq. ft. (75 %) 6,395 sq. ft. (74.2 %)
Min. Parking: 3 spaces 2 spaces 3 spaces
(1 enclosed)
VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Existing Use
North:
Residential
South:
Residential
East:
Residential
West:
Residential
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
Zoning District
Residential Cluster
Two - family Primary/Secondary
Two - family Primary/Secondary
Two - family Primary/Secondary
The review criteria for a variance request are prescribed in Chapter 12 -17,
Variances, Vail Town Code.
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity.
Front Setback: The applicant is requesting to vary the front setback from the
required 20 feet to a range of 9.5 feet to 13 feet to allow for a one -car garage
addition. A new front entry includes 6 square feet of GRFA within the front
setback. The roof covering over the entry extends 3 feet into the required 16 foot
setback for roof elements. (Covered entries are allowed to encroach into the
setback 4 feet). Approximately 220 square feet, of the 289 square foot garage is
proposed within the front and west side setbacks. Approximately 6 square feet of
GRFA for the new front entry is proposed within the front setback.
The proposed garage addition is flush with the front of the existing two - family
dwelling. Therefore the neighboring property's front yard sight lines are un-
affected by the proposed garage addition into the front setback.
West Side Setback: The applicant is requesting to vary the west side
setback from the required 15 feet to a range of 6 feet to 7 feet to allow for a one -
car garage addition and master bedroom over a portion of the garage.
Approximately 220 square feet of the 289 square foot garage is proposed within
the front and west side setbacks. Approximately 110 square feet of the proposed
master bedroom above the garage, is proposed within the west side setback.
The existing residence to the west (2963 Bellflower Drive) is situated at an angle
that places the home closer to its western property line than to its east, at the point
where the proposed garage addition is located (See Attachment A — Vicinity Map).
Town of Vail Page 7
Currently the west neighbor parks vehicles within one foot of the shared property
line. The west neighboring property has also been granted a variance for its east
setback to 6.4 feet. Staff does not believe the neighbor to the west will be
negatively impacted by the proposed addition into the west side setback.
Site Coverage: The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum allowable site
coverage by 123 square feet (1.4 %). There are currently two dwelling units on the
property. A lot less than 14,000 square feet in area, such as the subject property,
is permitted only a single dwelling unit. In previous requests the applicant
proposed to place a Type I EHU deed restriction on the second basement unit on
the property. The current proposal is to remove the second unit on the property
and bring into conformance with the Vail Town Code with regard to density. The
previous requests did not include a site coverage variance as the Type I EHU deed
restriction included a permitted increase in site coverage of 5 %. The proposal to
increase site coverage by 1.4% supports the town's policy of constructing enclosed
garage parking on older properties which is exhibited in the history of variance
approvals for garages which commonly include setback and site coverage
variances.
Parking in the right -of -way: The applicant is requesting a variance from the
requirement that all required parking must be located on site. Two of the proposed
surface parking spaces encroach up to 13 feet into the Bellflower Drive right -of-
way.
The lot size, lot configuration and existing structure location make providing the
required number of parking spaces, 3, on -site impossible, without a variance to
allow parking within the right -of -way. Town of Vail Public Works Department has
reviewed the proposal and supports the request for 2 of the surface parking spaces
within the right -of -way that are generally located in the same footprint as the
existing driveway.
Public Works requires that a revocable right -of -way permit be issued. Staff is
proposing a condition to that effect in Section VIII of this memorandum. Currently,
the neighbor to the west, most affected by the proposed parking, provides parking
within one foot of the shared property line. Staff does not believe the neighboring
properties will be negatively impacted by the proposed parking in the right -of -way.
Therefore, Staff believes this proposal will not negatively affect the other existing
or potential uses and structures in the vicinity in comparison to existing conditions.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the
objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
Staff does not believe approval of the requested setback, site coverage, and
Town of Vail Page 8
parking partially within the right -of -way variances would be a grant of special
privilege. The lot size, lot configuration, right -of -way configuration, existing
structure, and 50 ft. Gore Creek stream setback are all physical hardships on this
lot which greatly restrict the ability of improvements to be made to the structure
without a variance. The lot is nonconforming with regards to lot size and the house
currently encroaches into the front and side setbacks. Many of the structures in
the neighborhood have similar encroachments into the setbacks (see below).
Location
Description of the site
2923
Nonconforming 4 -plex approved by Eagle County.
Bellflower
Encroaches 9 ft. into the stream setback, 7.5 ft. into the
2339
east setback, and encroaches into the right -of -way.
2943
Granted a front setback variance to allow for a front
Bellflower
setback of 13 ft. Side setbacks are nonconforming at 12 ft.
2714
and 5 ft.
2953
Granted a parking variance to not enclose parking in
Bellflower
conjunction with EHU. Meets all setback requirements.
2963
Granted setback variances allowing for a 6 ft. front
Bellflower
setback, 6.4 ft. east side setback, and 8.4 ft. side setback.
3003
Granted front setback variance to allow for a 13 ft. front
Bellflower
setback, with GRFA being allowed beneath the garage.
Side setback variance was denied.
2852
Nonconforming. Encroaches into the front setback 9 ft.
Bellflower
and 1 ft. into side setback.
2942
Granted a front setback variance for a garage and storage
Bellflower
area to allow for a 15.5 ft. front setback. Nonconforming
with a 7 ft. encroachment into the east side setback.
2955
Garage located in front setback.
Basingdale
2945
Nonconforming. Encroaches into side setback 7 ft.
Basingdale
2935
Granted front setback variance to allow for GRFA below
Basingdale
garage in front setback. Below grade encroachment of
18.5 ft.
2925
Granted front setback variance to allow for a front setback
Basingdale
of 13 ft.
The following are other properties within the two- family primary/secondary zone
district which were granted variances to site coverage to facilitate garages.
Location
Description of the site
2586 Davos
Granted site coverage variance to facilitate garage.
Trail
Approved at 26% site coverage
2339
Granted site coverage variance to facilitate garage going
Chamonix
from single car to two cars. Approved at 23% site
Lane
coverage
2714
Granted site coverage variance to facilitate a new two car
Larkspur
garage. Approved at 26% site coverage
Lane
3140 Booth
Granted site coverage variance to facilitate a new two car
Falls Court
garage. Approved at 23% site coverage
Town of Vail Page 9
The proposed garage, entry, and master bedroom additions will improve the
functionality and value of the home, an upgrade supported by Land Use Plan Goal
1.3. Staff believes the proposed variance is consistent with the goals of the Town
of Vail Land Use Plan and purposes of the Two - family Residential District as
identified in Section IV of this memorandum.
Therefore, Staff believes the proposed relief from the setback, site coverage and
parking location regulations is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sites in the vicinity and to attain the objectives of this title without
a grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities,
and public safety.
The Public Works Department recommended that the existing evergreen tree in
the front yard be trimmed so as not to obstruct the view along Bellflower Drive from
a parked vehicle. Staff is proposing a condition to that effect in Section VIII of this
memorandum. Staff does not believe that approval of the variance will have a
negative effect on the factors listed above.
The proposed variances will facilitate an addition in the front and side setback area
that will not alter population; will not increase the required number of parking
spaces; will not affect any existing transportation or traffic facilities, public facilities,
or utilities; and will not affect public safety in comparison to existing conditions.
Therefore, Staff believes the proposed variance conforms to this criterion.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the
proposed variance.
Another factor in consideration of the requested variances is that the Planning and
Environmental Commission has approved similar variances on the subject property
on three previous occasions (March 26, 2001, November 24, 2003, and April 28,
2008).
VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval, with
conditions, of the requested variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section
12 -6D -9, Site Coverage, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially within the
public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail
Intermountain. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in
Section VII of this memorandum.
Town of Vail Page 10
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the
variance requests, the Community Development Department recommends, the
Commission pass the following motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the request for
variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12 -6D -9, Site
Coverage, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
residential addition and remodel with required parking located partially
within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block
6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. "
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the
variance requests, Staff recommends the following conditions:
"1. The variance approvals are contingent on the Applicant obtaining Town
of Vail approval of a design review application for the proposed
additions.
2. The Applicant shall submit a revocable right -of -way permit to Public
Works for all improvements located within the Bellflower Drive right -of-
way prior to requesting final public works inspections.
3. The Applicant shall remove the kitchen in the lower level second unit to
be in full compliance with the Vail Town Code prior to requesting final
planning inspections.
4. The Applicant shall trim the large existing evergreen tree in the front yard
so that no limbs hang below 7 feet as measured from the ground,
upward, prior to the requesting final planning inspections. "
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the
variance requests, Staff recommends the Commission, make the following
findings:
"1. That the granting of the variances do not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the Two -
Family Primary /Secondary Residential District.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the setback and
parking regulations results in a practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the development objectives of the
Town of Vail Page 11
Town Code or the Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential District.
4. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the Applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the Two - Family Primary /Secondary Residential District."
Town of Vail Page 12
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Applicants' Written Request
C. Proposed Architectural Plans dated June 30, 2014
D. Previously approved plans and Results from April 2008
Town of Vail Page 13
Town of Vail Page 14
June 30, 2014
Planning and Environmental Commission
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: Narrative for the Peters Variances, 2955 Bellflower Drive (PEC08 -0018)
Dear PEC Members,
This is a revision to the above referenced PEC number where we were granted
Front, east and west setbacks, Parking in the ROW and a Reduction in Required Parking
numbers from 5 to 4 for a garage entry addition and an enlargement of the Living Dining
rooms. The enlargement of the Living Dining rooms was completed in 2010 as a Phase 1
addition and utilized the variance to the East setback.
The 2008 PEC submittal converted the existing secondary unit into an EHU. This
proposal converts the existing secondary kitchen into a kitchenette for the recreation
room and eliminates the EHU.
We are requesting a revision to the following granted variances and one additional
site coverage variance.
1. Front Setback: We are requesting a revision to the granted front
setback of 9 feet to the proposed 9.5 feet. The granted variance had no GRFA
and approximately 105 square feet of the garage within the front setback. The
proposed revision has approximately 6 square feet of new GRFA and
approximately 114 square feet of the garage within the front setback.
2. Side Setback (west): We are requesting to allow the granted side
setback of 5.5 feet to remain as granted. The granted variance had
approximately 62 square feet of new GRFA and approximately 168 square feet of
the garage in the west setback. The proposed revision has approximately 110
square feet of new GRFA and 106 square feet of garage in the west setback.
3. Side Setback (east): The Living Dining addition within the granted
11.8 feet setback was completed in 2010.
4. Parking in the right -of -way: The granted variance was for 4 parking
spaces (1 in the garage and 3 into the right -of -way). The proposed residence
without the secondary or EHU requires 3 parking spaces as the total GRFA is less
than 4000 square feet. We are requesting a variance from the requirement
that all parking must be located on site (1 in the garage and 2 into the right -
of -way).
5. Site Coverage: No variance for site coverage was required in the
2008 submittal. Removal of the EHU eliminated the entitled 5 percent additional
site coverage and the 5 percent reduction of landscape area. We conform to the
required landscape area. We are requesting a variance in site coverage to allow
123 square feet more than our allowed 20 percent of the total area of the site.
We believe that the physical hardships of this property warrant variance approval.
Lot 6 is 8,633 sq. ft. in area, approximately 64' in width adjacent to the street and the
front property line is not parallel with the street. The existing structure is closer to the
sloping east property line with the entry and parking located on the west side of the
property. The addition of the garage and entry over part of the existing parking as shown
on plan with a bedroom above is consistent with the planning polices and development
objectives in the Town of Vail without grant of special privilege. The adjacent properties
are faced with similar limitations and the parking as shown on our site plan is a solution
found throughout this neighborhood.
Please contact us with any questions or comments at the number below.
Sincerely,
THE MJ MUELLER CO., INC.
Mark and Carl Mueller
P. O. Box 2747
Vail, CO. 81658
970 476 -2627
°a
>- Alt
l\J
\ \ I
m
O _
J
1 CL
Iry
f
z
y � p
a� N�
I �s
I
y � I
I
LS
V
0 22
� t
0
z
w
o �1
X95 acl�� ;S'I
_
O
� O
o
U�pZ CL ZZY�
�ith
r -
999L9 opeioloa `llen
LZ9Z91b LDLZ xogo•d
-oui `•oo aopanw rw ay;
�r
o _
"o
1`
O naryJO107 '-nvn
X00 �O�c'61�01'L'# -19711Vd 'VSirno1�31139 S.SbZ
"any 'tea -ft-VA "J-Lol
Noulda -V 5,zialaj
-Hoa 2f4(,C of -lAaAlH4,19 ' ?7 w
IN
N
Ln
$$
$ $'$
O O 5
U+
M
-.�
o �cL p�1!
uj 3
0�
°
19
P
r�-
�r
o _
"o
1`
O naryJO107 '-nvn
X00 �O�c'61�01'L'# -19711Vd 'VSirno1�31139 S.SbZ
"any 'tea -ft-VA "J-Lol
Noulda -V 5,zialaj
-Hoa 2f4(,C of -lAaAlH4,19 ' ?7 w
IN
Z
N
Ln
n
0�
Z
889L8 opeiopa ylen
LZ9Z9L4 LbLZ xoq -o-d
-oui `Y)o jollentu (w e}
tooto�b4�OIL�i '13�d'�1arlQ"131'�S 55bz
-9OS '"4 NIVIOtIOlA*- LNI ' WA 1l i 41OW "9 -to 1
Not- 4-Iadv a214:3-QI1;��d
+Ior "-4*r of 'A/111WAnS -):IA
°s� t:�
z
I �+
T — -�
n o
s� J- j g
z
z�
1
- - ---
ar
vo a
3 fl
P
3Z
z�3
Z
t
� z
III
w
P
7
.
J
°s� t:�
z
I �+
T — -�
n o
s� J- j g
z
z�
1
- - ---
ar
vo a
3 fl
P
3Z
z�3
Z
t
� z
III
w
P
7
.
sms OPS -10:) `I!BA O a aT! O'109 1-1 1'dn
LM-SL4 LVLZx«a'a'd z�ooiorc�I�COIL# 137�d� 'emolil13a �FfL
-owi �'oo jollenw rw 94; N -vwnoH -1Nl lWl,, 9 x'19 '9 -4 °I
tiaZ vonc ok 'ILaJ1418�5 7311
X�
Y
_7
wmAl ?
-a II
�Jo
%L
��
m
w
S
F
�3
W
O
O
WdC
�
II
II
II
II
II
_7
wmAl ?
-a II
J
W
J
�Jo
cl s III
��
m
W
O
O
J
W
J
li1C9k8 OPeaOroO `III
Lb 91.4 LiLZ xoq 'old
-aui ~`-oo japanw Fw app,
0 Q`lzl0 -10-�, ' II-YA
fc+ota��l�ol Z�* -ra° d 143" MAT W SSb2
'Sn� -p�9a HIVIWOH -l�Nl lIVA �>hdla 910
NO I J-14 d.'d (�I3fj �S Uzi Sze �
s - Paz arc oti -I�Ih,��g r
CP In
Qjr IF)
Vp Yw�� `Z��J&ppr owC
� � y
� Z o
p
OL
£2 — —
S Hi I F
o
0
K3 I is
I
i
-p
p �
i
,o;u oz
N
o
g
�
.1
:9
3
jl
�I
�I
,o;u oz
N
a
q
l
u l
� 2
y, 2
� LL
J
bL
0
a
q
l
u l
� 2
y, 2
� LL
H84L8 OPBJOI- 5!g^
LL4Z•9L4 L4LZ xoq .od
�
sF
{oato�cbl�COlz� �a'dd ��o'yYl�9 SSbt
'3WI"o* jellentu tw am;
9(r, 'Mao rn>u-NnOW4i.NI 'n-an I% -rza!9 i-J )-&l
r N
�s3
d
�2
Z_Hp
�iXi43d-c�n
W
� N
7
2pC1
OS n. 4`P Ny�e
W
W
1
i
r
--HO7, �mr of Wluu4ns
n-
o-
8
far•
�
sF
0
F 1I0
i° i
P�=
n'2
oP
F a
a
pW �YYW ay
3
ly
r0
V '
N
0
0
r N
�
p
yam,
'�
d+•
a
pW �YYW ay
3
ly
r0
V '
N
0
0
- 099LO oppJoloo yeti
z9oz4aLV 4WZ xoq otl
-au! `na aapanui 1w age.
0
ir.
aw
2
'9(V'Aaa. Hp4t4noN+ a tll lydn
NDI�I44'sf �N'�415� S���d
-plaz 3r,k)P o4 ikiLmOog -�-M
S rr }
I
II
Ilp
II ,
i
i
r
��1
f
0
ir.
aw
2
'9(V'Aaa. Hp4t4noN+ a tll lydn
NDI�I44'sf �N'�415� S���d
-plaz 3r,k)P o4 ikiLmOog -�-M
S rr }
I
II
Ilp
II ,
i
i
r
��1
89948 OpeJO103'118A 00-V--AO-10-7 '11V/\
Lz9z•9L4 LVLZ xoq \S)
j,00--LO,&*If,004 55Loz
'DUI I*oo jellentu rwoqs gnr, "a A70-14 -) sal <
11) ;.
ilk
a
r
999L9 opeAopo ylen
LZ9Z-9L4 LbLZ xoq •o•d
•oui `-oo aapanw fw eta
O Q ,V'ZIO.1 -7 11�l1�
taafn�b1�o17n# d �14VIOIJ'n3$ 55br/
9nS'734 NIs/lM1oN4T+1'IIWh 90V 19 101
N � i 1 i c14� �N341s�t Szf�d
-61 rrc ar+nC ok n�Jluiiln� �d
N �
N
a�
o
EE
�p. U
4V
imm
Bp
}
2
s�
Q
w
w
6
�1
rF-
Q
C6
�3F7 z c�
U f\
\ C
\ y
}Nairo } N
J
71
^r
d
pp �
m
It
S! tti y
\ R $�
191
gals
-'Qz�
34IG ,91 u� w
zIS
CL
O 9
og
I J
L-1�I
t�9f���I�pIZ #734'ZI31'1�1}�73g 5S6z
gns 1'9� NI�cLrinotg2l31N1 lly,A �9 :1� 1$ ,9 1,71
goat T-hJV tI J;Ss
h
0
A-
WS� i
1
i
0
0
Q
fl
W
fX
I
�
fl
^
x
A \/
0
0
L----41
Loa +- Oe1>>fiolz#�3fid d ��r r�ot3'1 9 55bZ
SM •raQ NtVLVVOOl31N1 iWA 'q A -2019 '9 -5pl
I�lalll44'� --_IDN�Kt5g�i 5�� -ad
Qool 114dy fl Jas :;
/ .0 VP Y
\
1
1
i
1
O
Q-
7
Ql�
N
t-
�F
�
M-v
ry-
/ .0 VP Y
\
1
1
i
1
O
Q-
7
i�
0
DKMI-i-L
N
t-
fco -LO 9-tr1Sa1Z#Y�VA' r�cr� 71�g 55bZ
'g "S -W r4lAdOnOkj: lw 11 /1` ") �9 101
No I a ?N3aI598
'Bon fl 'IkJ-LI V4905 -3Z} e>*A
�;
F
3
�z
O
— ' I
I
a
p � �
4 sr �?, a,7- s
1131 01
St
\i? �Kl A asscLik;,On `% b2
N
a I
I � 9
I
I p
3Z
U
W
j � 1
-S
o I ass odxaOn °G ob
oW8,
S
r+-
u
b
— �
O
u
d
�1J
z
p
T
N �
1
1'
2!�
foota��i�olZ�l3�'d� ��9T'ta?�1'13$ �SbL
-gM� n NI�l1NroU�31 �I '1I d/� '9f -Idl
goat '11�1dFy £I l3� "IV�11W9nS-azl �t
ri-
d
y
and
r� p
o N yp1yy,
0
O In 1l+II
Q�
V
V' Z
z o
O
.4
N
N�
Q CA
PRI
1gLq., ul
za FpL'a'
3 0
�L
LL
0
i
y
and
r� p
o N yp1yy,
0
O In 1l+II
Q�
V
V' Z
z o
O
.4
N
N�
Q CA
PRI
y:
toofo��I�pl Z Y bbd' r'f��13¢ 55bZ
ans .
No 11 I (I(IV
%
O
u
Al
II.
-$
13003
"Ilbd-V fl
195 I�F1L1W9E1S-3t1 7�
x
�cST
�Z
� S
S.
a
N��
� �
n
ILI
LU
O
A
0 00
%
O
u
Al
II.
-$
P
lu
LL
i
n
LU
O
�
0 00
%
O
u
Al
II.
O
qq,pp
W CL
J
M
C
K
z
J
P
lu
LL
i
� LL
O
qq,pp
W CL
J
M
C
K
z
fL4'�zfQ"I o� '�l'dn
905 T'ai t4l -VLNn jS-w( INA '9��0'� `9 1�1
X0111 QC��f �1N34 �5��! 52131 -�c�
t �>
'21�
d 2
V
f,
I
IL
O
I
d
r.
$o
I
I. 3
i -7.
47_^.
IL -
Ij
l 1.
'21�
d 2
V
odwol o7 /-1 Po'/\
ioohOS+I fOIT # 37JVJ `zj�PfaJ4713$ !S-G67
$nS'I t MPtLNnoVSalt4i IIV^ '9 -ion
VUUG "rrzd'd tl 135 lvj- "H9n13-?9 lln�
t
z �
N 3N
I
i
i
O
llI
1Ll
-o
0
0-
L�
BQ"mo? '11bn
fOOfo£$Ig017,# 'pia n3 S56Z
DS ASQ NIVLN00H'& .NI llVA "9-;;"ff '9 1°I
N O LL I G (IV EPN3Q1'33 8 �
godL't��db fl 195 W- u'"905 -a4 /�u
i
Z
AL
Ll �!
J- 1 II II
si
r4 s
�! rtp
o �
1
3 14
s
K �
iA
if
O
rl�
I�
f�
oQb�jo-i o7 "iPd�
4004- b�-�1E0 1Z *13D�- NA'- el9tTa7:4)Ij8 556Z
-onS'1\3II NlvionOW�33LHI llil\ '�l 'g 4m
I ku(1(,1V 3:)N -4aiS�a S ,8-81---4d
d 7d
ED
I
t�
m
4-1 L-As �alsiu�ar�-
?I
4-
1
i
eY O
r�
tl
2 il
z
0
F
V
d
r-
LL
O
Lu
C p
�
i
i
i
L1]
d 7d
ED
I
t�
m
4-1 L-As �alsiu�ar�-
?I
4-
1
i
eY O
r�
tl
2 il
z
0
F
V
d
r-
LL
O
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
April 28, 2008
1:OOpm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Rollie Kjesbo Bill Pierce
Michael Kurz
Sarah R. Paladino (departed at 2:40 after Item 3)
Scott Proper
Susie Tjossem
David Viele
Site Visits:
1. Osaki Sushi Restaurant— 100 East Meadow Drive
2. Peters Residence — 2955 Bellflower Drive
Driver: Warren
30 minutes
1. A request for a final review of variances from Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, 12 -6D -9, Site
Coverage, Section 12- 6D -11, Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition
and remodel with required parking located partially within the public right -of -way, located at 2955
Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC080018)
Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Carl Mueller
Planner: Nicole Peterson
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 6 -0 -0
1. The variance approvals are contingent on the Applicant obtaining Town of Vail
approval of a design review application for the proposed additions.
2. The Applicant shall submit a revocable right -of -way permit to Public Works for all
improvements located within the Bellflower Drive right -of -way prior to issuance of the
building permit.
3. The Applicant shall deed restrict the secondary dwelling unit as a Type I Employee
Housing Unit and file all necessary documentation with the Town of Vail Housing
Coordinator prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
4. The Applicant shall trim the large existing evergreen tree in the front yard so that no
limbs hang below 7 feet as measured from the ground, upward, prior to the issuance
of the Certificate of Occupancy.
Nicole Peterson presented a summary of the Staff memorandum.
Carl Mueller, applicant's representative, was available for questions.
There was no public comment.
Commissioner Proper asked for clarification of the scope of this proposal in comparison to the
other variances granted in the neighborhood. He also clarified the hardships on the property.
Page 1
Commissioner Viele noted the similarity of this proposal to past variance approvals. He noted
that the house was originally constructed under Eagle County jurisdiction and this variance
approval would not be a grant of special privilege.
Commissioner Kurz asked for clarification concerning the deed restrictions of the EHU.
Commissioner Paladino had no comment.
Commissioner Tjossem questioned if the second floor bedroom was a grant of special privilege
given its location within the setback. She noted that the garage was a positive addition.
Commissioner Kjesbo noted the EHU deed restriction and the new garage are in keeping with
the Town's development goals.
15 minutes
2. A request for final review of a final plat for a minor subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13 -4, Minor
Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a re- subdivision of the Front Door Site, located at 151,
250, and 280 Vail Lane /(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of
Vail Community Development Department upon request), and setting for details in regard
thereto. (PEC080019)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Proper VOTE: 6 -0 -0
Warren Campbell presented a summary of the proposal and the Staff memorandum. Warren
noted some minor corrections that had been made to the proposed final plat by the applicant's
legal representatives subsequent to the printing of the Staff memorandum.
Gerry Arnold, Vail Resorts, was available for questions.
Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowner's Association, asked for clarification concerning the boundary with
Mill Creek Subdivision.
There were no Commissioner comments.
15 minutes
A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special
Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development
District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition to the Osaki's Sushi restaurant, located at 100
East Meadow Drive /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC080016)
Applicant: Takeshi and Kazue Osaki, represented by K.H. Webb Architects
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Recommendation of approval with condition(s)
MOTION: Tjossem SECOND: Proper VOTE: 4 -0 -2 ( Kjesbo & Viele recused)
1. The Applicants must obtain final review and approval of the proposed development
plan by the Town of Vail Design Review Board, prior to making an application for the
issuance of a building permit.
2. The Applicants shall provide the legally executed and duly recorded deed restriction
with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office for the off -site employee housing unit
prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the construction
associated with this amendment.
3. The Applicants shall make the off -site employee housing unit ready for occupancy
prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the construction
Page 2
� ..
� y 2
`� . }.• \ r : . a ,< az
-
.
« .
Oil-
�.
{4 \.
ƒ/
� \
TOWN OF VAIL �
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: July 28, 2014
SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on approaches to
address identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not
just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan as an
outcome of the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project, an initiative to
examine the Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines
applicable to Vail Village.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Warren Campbell
SUMMARY
The purpose of this public hearing is to request a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council on approaches to address identified elements to ensure the special character of
Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master
Plan. The Vail Village Character Area Preservation project has reviewed the Vail
Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design
Considerations to address the adopted problem statement. The following problem
statement was developed in conjunction with the Vail Town Council and has guided the
process, discussion and outcomes.
As buildings in the Village continue to redevelop or as other changes occur
to the physical features of Vail Village, are the Town's current regulations,
design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure that the special
character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced.
A recommendation to the Vail Town Council is sought on possible approaches /solutions
to address identified elements which need to be potentially amended in order to improve
the existing development review process and further the overall design goals for the
Village.
Five elements have been identified through the public process with the community and
the Planning and Environmental Commission as needing to be addressed. Those
elements are as follows:
• Landmarks
o Public places and spaces
o Pedestrian streets and corridors
o Iconic features
• Application boundaries of the Urban Design Guide Plan
• Possible expansion
• Clarification of when a property is within the boundaries
• Non - conforming properties and redevelopment potential
• Height in excess of permitted
• Dwelling units and GRFA in excess of permitted
• Site coverage in excess of permitted
• Incentive to redevelop when currently in excess of permitted
• Architectural Character
• Maintaining a sense of a Vail as a special /identifiable place
• Allowing for variety
• Core verses outlining areas
• Specific Design Elements of the Urban Design Guide Plan
o Retail store fronts
• Building height
• Sun /shade of outdoor spaces
• Importance of outdoor dining decks /patios
Staff has attached a copy of the March 11, 2013 power point which discusses these
elements in greater depth and with imagery (Attachment A). Staff has provided links to
the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan under the
attachments section of this memorandum for review (Attachments B and C).
II. BACKGROUND
On February 18, 2009, the Vail Town Council adopted Resolution No. 23, Series of
2008, a resolution that provided for certain updates to the Vail Village Master Plan. One
of the more significant updates to the plan was the addition of an objective recognizing
the "historic" importance of architecture, structures, landmarks, plazas and features with
the goal of preserving the existing character of Vail Village. In addition, one new policy
statement was added to the plan to further the newly stated objective. The policy
statement was developed to guide the Town's decision - making in achieving each of the
stated objectives, whether it be through the review of private sector development
proposals or in implementing capital improvement projects. Finally, action steps were
suggested as immediate follow -up actions necessary to implement the goals of this
Plan.
To that end, the Vail Village Master Plan was updated to include the following language:
GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE
PRESERVING UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN
ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY.
Town of Vail Page 2
1.4 Objective: (in part)
Recognize the "historic" importance of the architecture, structures,
landmarks, plazas and features in preserving the character of Vail Village.
1.4.1 Policy:
The historical importance of
other similar features shall
development review process.
structures, landmarks, plazas and
e taken into consideration in the
1.4.2 Policy:
The town should grant flexibility in the interpretation and
implementation of its regulations and design guidelines to help
protect and maintain the existing character of Vail Village.
1.4.3 Policy:
Identification of "historic" importance shall not be used as the sole
means of preventing or prohibiting development in Vail Village.
GOAL #1 Action Steps: (in part)
6. Compile a list and develop a map identifying the location of potential
structures, landmarks, plazas and other similar features that may be of
historical importance.
On October 18, 2011 the Vail Town Council discussed Vail Village Historic Preservation
and Landmark Designation. As a part of the discussion information was provided on
historic preservation, preservation programs, creation of historic districts, common
property owner concerns regarding historic designation, possible benefits of a historic
district, etc. At the public hearing the Vail town Council was asked to respond to the
following question:
Should Town staff pursue a public process with the community to discuss
preserving and protecting historic structures and landmarks in Vail Village
and implementing any regulatory tools that may be necessary to carry out
the Town's development objectives?
The Vail Town Council directed staff to pursue an initiative to preserve and protect
historic structures and landmarks in Vail Village.
On November 20, 2012 the Vail Town Council was introduced to the Vail Village
Character Study that staff and Tom Braun of Braun and Associates was beginning. At
the hearing The Vail Town Council was asked to affirm "The Question at Hand"
(question provide under summary section of this memorandum). The Vail Town Council
affirmed the direction that the project would take and the question it would seek to
answer.
Town of Vail Page 3
On February 7, 2013 several focus group sessions were conducted to obtain input and
feedback on the initiative. Staff and the consultant have placed the comments heard
from the focus groups into the following categories:
Near Unanimous Consensus
The character of the Village is important to Vail's identity, it sets Vail apart,
makes Vail unique. It is important to maintain this, to hold onto, reinforce the
original vision for the Village.
The Village is great, by and large the regulations /guidelines we have in place are
working, with only a very few exceptions the new buildings have
added /strengthened /reinforced the Village's character
The Village core is distinct from the rest of the Village, "character" is strongest in
this area.
Some variation to the literal interpretation of the "Swiss Alpine village" is OK, not
all buildings will be perfect and not all buildings need to be, an anomaly here and
there is OK.
With regard to buildings, maintaining existing scale of the Village core is critically.
There is no one single building in the Village that would rise to "landmark status"
rather it is the scale of buildings, the views, the plazas and public spaces, the
pedestrian flow, dining decks are what set the Village apart.
Iconic improvements — Covered Bridge. The Clock Tower (albeit no clear
consensus as to whether the existing clock tower is worthy of preservation or
whether having a clock tower in this location is important)
Guidelines may need a refinement here or there, but no major overhaul of
system is needed.
General sense of what is most important —
1 . Building scale
2. Public spaces /pedestrian flow /vitality and street life
3. Quality of design /construction /materials
4. Architecture
Widely Held Consensus
Some modest degree of additional height in Core might be acceptable (to
address floor to ceiling "expectations" of guests)
Greater building scale is acceptable outside of the Core (within reason)
Town of Vail Page 4
Design controls (UDGP) to further reinforce the Village's establish character
should be expanded to area outside of the Core (East Village, Meadow Drive)
Street life, vitality, activity ... specifically outdoor dining decks are critical to the
character of the Village.
Some Degree of Consensus
The most important change needed to design guidelines for the Village is to allow
for /encourage the use of high quality materials (code talk for materials other than
stucco).
Guidelines need to encourage creativity /broader expression (while still respecting
"alpine" character)
More flexibility is needed with regard to window treatments (don't mandate
divided panes, allow for larger glass).
Need to resolve conflict in Guidelines that require landscaping that blocks
visibility of store fronts.
Other Pertinent Comments
When do you stop using increased levels of development as an incentive for
redevelopment?
The physical area of "the Village" is considered to extend from Vail Road to Vail
Valley Drive, maybe to Manor Vail.
Water is very important — both Gore Creek and the water features in the Village.
Every site /building is unique, has its own characteristics /considerations that will
influence review process.
Mechanical — needs to be requirement to screen.
What to do with non - conforming buildings — how will they ever have motivation to
re- develop? Lodge at Vail, Sitzmark, etc.
On February 11, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission was introduced to
the project and the desired outcomes upon completion.
On March 11, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a work session
to begin discussion on elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban
Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations which may need to be
reexamined to address the project's problem statement. The reults from this hearing
are attached (Attachment C).
Town of Vail Page 5
The five following topical areas of the Vail Village Master Plan and Vail Village
Urban Design Guide were discussed. The topical areas were developed through
the focus group participation, staff's, and consultant's experience and
observations. The five topics area were as follows:
• Architectural Character — Vail Village was "originally conceived as a mountain
resort in the pattern of a quaint European alpine Village. Do the Town's
guidelines further this goal, what types of architectural expression, use of
materials, etc. may be appropriate while still holding true to this vision?
• The Urban Design Guide Plan and Design and Design Considerations —Where
do these guidelines currently apply, where should they apply?
Future re- development potential of properties that currently exceed allowable
height, GRFA, etc. — A number of properties in VV that currently exceed zoning
standards are considered potential candidates for redevelopment. Historically,
properties in Vail have increased in size when re- developed. How can Town
encourage re- development while at same time maintain the scale of buildings in
the Village?
• Landmark Designation —Are there improvements in the Village that warrant
designation of "landmark" status?
• Specific Elements of Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations —
Eleven specific elements of the UDGP have been identified that may warrant
refinement /clarification.
On April 1, 2014, the Vail Town Council received and update on the progress of the
project and directed staff to move forward and complete Phase 1 of the project.
On May 12, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing to
revisit the project and bring new members up to the current level of knowledge. There
was a discussion regarding the selected comparable communities and the fact that they
were not ski communities. It was explained why the comparable communities were
selected. Staff was specifically asked to speak with Carmel, California to discuss their
tools to maintain character, bulk, and mass in the commercial core. A discussion with
the planning director revealed that the primary factor limiting control development and
redevelopment was water supply. There is no additional water resource so no land use
can become more intense. Zoning regulations and a historic building inventory/registry
also provide for significant restriction and review.
III. RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and
Environmental Commission listens to the presentation, asks questions, provides input
and forwards a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to proceed forward with an
Town of Vail Page 6
effort to address identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not
just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan as an outcome
of the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project, an initiative to examine the
Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines applicable to Vail Village.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of approval to move forward with the examination and implementation
of potential amendments to the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design
Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations, staff recommends the following
motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation to
the Vail Town Council to proceed forward with the Vail Village Character Area
Preservation initiative to examine and implement approaches to address the
identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just
maintained but also enhanced through the application and implementation Vail
Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village
Design Considerations."
IV. ATTACHMENTS
A. PEC Power Point Presentation from March 11, 2013
B. Vail Village Master Plan
C. Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
Town of Vail Page 7
4
w
(4
a
a
z
4
L N
d �
V �
m O
U Cl)
d Y
L
O
—U
w
>a
a
0
V
D
m
13
0
Fm
Cn
O
O
F-
.C/)
x
LU
Cn
Cn
O
U
O
I
N
N
N
Q
O
D
Y
i
C6
C6
J
11
^V 1!
W
Q
C�
D
O
O
-C
.
m
4-0
W
4-0
O
n
4-0
^�
W
E
0
^O
W
O
0
O
Cv
�E
O
CZ
O
s=
O
O
U
O
Z
.
0-
^L V
Q
U �
C6 �
O
IZ- (/)
U}'
s=
ca Cv
E
Cy
U W
O
4-0
U_
U �
� U
Q a)
c-
. C/)
11
a
�J
a
b
U N
d Y
cu
L
—U
w
>a
},
.O
Cn
Cn
=3
E
U
O
Cn
Y
i
C6
C6
J
11
^V 1!
W
Q
C�
D
O
O
-C
.
m
4-0
W
4-0
O
n
4-0
^�
W
E
0
^O
W
O
0
O
Cv
�E
O
CZ
O
s=
O
O
U
O
Z
.
0-
^L V
Q
U �
C6 �
O
IZ- (/)
U}'
s=
ca Cv
E
Cy
U W
O
4-0
U_
U �
� U
Q a)
c-
. C/)
11
a
�J
a
b
U N
d Y
cu
L
—U
w
>a
O
E
O
U
.v
�
0
Y
i
C6
C6
J
11
^V 1!
W
Q
C�
D
O
O
-C
.
m
4-0
W
4-0
O
n
4-0
^�
W
E
0
^O
W
O
0
O
Cv
�E
O
CZ
O
s=
O
O
U
O
Z
.
0-
^L V
Q
U �
C6 �
O
IZ- (/)
U}'
s=
ca Cv
E
Cy
U W
O
4-0
U_
U �
� U
Q a)
c-
. C/)
11
a
�J
a
b
U N
d Y
cu
L
—U
w
>a
(n
O
0
Fm
0
N
■
W
W
�1I
M J
C
CD
cn
N
D
c�
N
N
C
CD
0
a
�J
a
a
ti
a
z
b
F-
L N
d �
V �
m O
U N
d Y
L
c O
-U
w
>a
yj
r,m-
ylbl
0
M-17
Cf)
0 0
LJ >
a
LA-
4=
F-
Cl)
2.2
o
LU
>a
4=0
U
■ C
■
w
M
rm
2T
-t
. to
N'
> LJ >
a
LA-
4=
F—
o
>LU
a
U)
4-0
U)
U)
LL
u)
n
rm
2T
-t
. to
N'
> LJ >
a
LA-
4=
F—
o
>LU
a
(1)
a
.N
d
0
L
()
(D
N
Jc:
V♦ V!
O 0
}+ L
n '
W •
V♦ p
C: CU
O �
OF
■ rn
nv /,
W
C
(D
V!
O
^L
W
. —
O
Ali
J
W
QL
U
U)
c�
J
4-0
U
U
El
.
a
�J
I
a
b
F-
� .y
U N
d Y
L
c Q
-U
w
>a
0 x�
a
(1)
FM
t�
a�
r
J}k��
ji
i
f
ET ii E L 2
r J -�LiCi
P o�
W
LLJ
E�-- L2 I i I I In LIR�jl
v
W
Y
l_
W J
_O I
� N
N �
4- U
N �
N �
N �
N
O i
� O
N +�
Ul
>
O
O
Q o �
o= o
4-, > �U��
O./ /
O �I
4-0 •>
E
i }, >+
Q W
cn
w d
U O N O
6 (D U O_
U 'i '� s 'tn
N
Co E N O U Cl)
O m i
Q, O N (1) M 70
(0 (1) -U
m 'cc w
U) N OUM. Lo >a
N
C
y
�
R
�7
�
xx
a
m
5�1
ET ii E L 2
r J -�LiCi
P o�
W
LLJ
E�-- L2 I i I I In LIR�jl
v
W
Y
l_
W J
_O I
� N
N �
4- U
N �
N �
N �
N
O i
� O
N +�
Ul
>
O
O
Q o �
o= o
4-, > �U��
O./ /
O �I
4-0 •>
E
i }, >+
Q W
cn
w d
U O N O
6 (D U O_
U 'i '� s 'tn
N
Co E N O U Cl)
O m i
Q, O N (1) M 70
(0 (1) -U
m 'cc w
U) N OUM. Lo >a
�
�
�
�
�
._
�
�
�
�
F
z �
_ }
. »»
�.«
}2 >22y ■
a
�
�<
�\
\
�
�
LA-
C14�
�
�
�
2
m
k �
§ 0
R $
Q
Q m
■ o
g R
-U
> a.
O
L
13
O
Al
a
.N
d
0
L
O
.N
U)
W
0.
O
U4 Fj
U
L
i
O
(a
U.
U
cn
Cn
Z-
Cn
CD
0
�
�
UUJ=
W
CD
/
W
U)
L N
d �
V �
Cn
U N
Z-
Lj-
/
b
F-
L N
d �
V �
cLC O
U N
d Y
L
O
—U
w
>a
O
L
13
O
A
V
i
J
m
i
LM
V
4�
s
V
El
N
O
O
C6
N
4-0
m
E
N
N
O
O
Q
E
O
c�
0
0
U
E
0
^n
W
C�
U
C�
LL
�g
cn
O
O
cn
O
U
c�
cn
c�
O
0
R
k VY
LZ
Z-
l
N
C6
cn
_ a
C6
cn
4-0
cn C
cn O
cn E
C: 4-0
E O LJJ
cn (n
E
O O '> cn
cn W
co#
C� m o
N s n
U L U '� �o
O U },
m
00 D Q J EU) a.
L
U)
U
O
C6
�
O
},
�
O
O
O
O
^�
QL
N
�
LO
O
C6
O
C6
0
�
E
U
�
�
�
co
L
U)
U
O
C6
�
O
},
�
O
O
O
O
^�
QL
N
�
LO
N
C6
L
U)
U
O
Co
�
O
O
QL
�
C6
O
�
�
O
�
O
�
�
O
a)
cli
I
U
4-0
r
W
}+
W
E
U
2
Co
O
O
U
O
O
O
>%
a)
4-0
O
O
�
m
x
>
G
w
;5
k#
a
b
F-
.o
s y
U �
L
� o
—U
w
>a
O
Cn
U
D
O
N
U
O
I
L
J
.
W
Q
0-
C�
D
O
O
.
W
4-0
O
n
4-0
W
E
0
^O
W
O
0
O
a)
-t
O
0-
O
E
O
O
U
O
Z
.
.
a
�J
a
a
z
4
L N
d �
V �
m
U N
d Y
L
Q
—U
w
>a
n
V
^L
Q
4-0
U
�
C6
�
O
U)
U}'
c�
a)
E
a)
4-0
U
w
O
4
U_
U
�
U
�
Q
O
0-
Cn
.
a
�J
a
a
z
4
L N
d �
V �
m
U N
d Y
L
Q
—U
w
>a
N
L
J
�r
I
w
J'
(4
.y
a
ti
O
a
ti
L N
d �
V �
m O
U Cl)
d Y
L
O
—U
w
>a
(1)
Y
LM
m
E
cn
ce
0
a
ce
ce
0
z
C/)
F-
LU
LU
w
F-
C/)
ZA
w
(4
Lj-
Cl)
04
m 0
U)
Q
LU
CL
N
L
J
cn
w
v
a
cn
0
z
Q
w
V
J
a.
a
�J
wl
d
a
L •O
t4 N
U Cl)
m Y
L
t4 p
-U
W
>a
U)
M�d
LM
m
E
'72
j
ai
I a Z�
i -
L9
ig
a
LA-
4=
F-
Cl)
04
m 0
Cl)
LU
CL
N
Y
L
J
1 4
- wl�
d �
�--- -"fie
f'
Ai
O
�J
e
�cn a
3
a
0
V
7
Z`1
l
a
LA-
a
z
b
F-
L N
d �
i .O
t4 N
U Cl)
o
d Y
L
—U
'c� w
(1)
Y
LM
m
E
0,111,
7r7-
77-
>
>
o
ELI
a
LA-
cz
am
�t
an
F-
Cl)
04
m 0
Cl)
o
W LU
N
Y
L
J
O
O
O
W
0
QL
C` •
i
ca
W
L
a)
O
U)
U)
c�
0
a�
a�
s•1
0
4-0
^U)
W
W
QL
W
4-0
i
U)
O
4-
U)
O
0
s•1
23
O
0—
0
W
U
ca
QL
O
U
O
QL
0
a�
c�
c6
H
^L
W
O
►E
U
O
vi
a)
N
c6
N
4-0
W
0
L
O
. i
O
U
a)
O
E
o
(D
^O, O
W Q
Q
�O
0 0
w
a
a
b
.o
o
s y
U �
L
• W
>a
O
U
U
U
°
0-
QL
o
�
o
U)
O_
^U
W
C` •
i
ca
W
L
a)
O
U)
U)
c�
0
a�
a�
s•1
0
4-0
^U)
W
W
QL
W
4-0
i
U)
O
4-
U)
O
0
s•1
23
O
0—
0
W
U
ca
QL
O
U
O
QL
0
a�
c�
c6
H
^L
W
O
►E
U
O
vi
a)
N
c6
N
4-0
W
0
L
O
. i
O
U
a)
O
E
o
(D
^O, O
W Q
Q
�O
0 0
w
a
a
b
.o
o
s y
U �
L
• W
>a
N
Y
L
J
W
0
H
Y
U
O
J
U
w
(4
a
a
z
a
ti
L N
V �
U Cl)
o
a� Y
L
—U
w
>a
N
Y
L
J
W
L �
Oi,
V
O
L
O O
•>
L ^,
E �--+
CU
•�
4-0
4-0
4-0
W a
a
U _ O
� O • C6
U °
W U •V C6 O �
E > Rio
O
Cl)
C6 Co
p i m0
U) I—Z co U) 4-0
V, VJ s y
a� }, 4-0 0
c� O . W
n/ • • • >a
4-0
2
am
t�
0
(1)
LM
(1)
Ja
J
MM
71
U-5
a
LA-
4=
F-
Cl)
C14
m 0
Cl)
o
LU
a.
2
am
t�
0
(1)
LM
(1)
Ja
, J"n
F 4*-'
Ii
Ar bL
Vim] U
O
rr
a
LA-
4=
F-
04
m 0
Cl)
(1)
0) -j�
o
W L.0
2
am
t�
0
(1)
LM
(1)
Ja
a
wl
C14
m 0
0
LU
a.
■
0
a
t�
0
(1)
L
s
ob-
U
w
n
L O
4-
U)
c
O
U)
\I 1/
4-0
O
O
-0
QL
QL
m
n
V
r)
W
4-0
O
V!
m
QL
�U
.QL
4-0
O
C-
U)
C*--
(D
C6
O
U)
W
U)
W
O
—0
\
QL
QL
m
O
D
CD
W
0
U)
a)
E
a)
a)
4-0
C**-�
�-j
O
O
N
N
N
4-0
c6
W
a
�J
IdOWN
a
0
0
F-
� .y
U N
d Y
L
W
>a
d
if X�I
j
d
d
d
N
d
lot
d
O
L
0
0
0
U
"
A
M
�J
LL
d
4
H
i+
Cl)
o
v �
U �
L
W
>a
d
,X
d
d
d
N
d
lot
d
O
L
0
0
0
U
"
P
l
N't,
N r�
�1 , i
w
(4
d
G
b
F-
r.+
v �
U Cl)
o
d Y
L
W
>a
i p
E
O �_ �. 4-0
4-0 7E7)
�--+
> � _
a) 0
� C6 O O cL
O = 0 0
QL
:3 O p O
.. t. O > 0 O
O � M -0 O
QL O }' IZZ
L U O U) CO C6
--
0_0 O
E m� O m U a)
._ O
E •� 0 a) U
L O >
0 0,5
> -0 O 0)
0 4-0 CNI.
Q •EZ p •cn }, O — O
V 0 0 0 U O p�
L .0 0
U
O D U p 0
O U) U) U)
O = >a
• C� co to
E
a m
O a)
> a)
4�
� O
U
DC .�
U)
CL O L— �
O
L V! A r -i
IZ
a) O ' �
C6 O
L O �
0
O Q QL
O >%
4-0
V i
CL
LZ x
Z 0- w
Z-
- 4-0 .
4-0 4-0
a)
�_
E O a)
0- 4-0
O U C6
a)
> �
a) O },
a)
O a)
4-0
`u F-
O � U
a)
(1)
4�
O O
'0
� C6
O Q >-, 0 W
� >a
0) • • •
LM
(2)
LM
m
Ja
Al
LM
U
(1)
4=0
■
U
LM
El
LIP
w
(4
Lj-
Cl)
04
m 0
Cl)
O
LU
CL
L
V
L
m
s
Al
L
V
s
L
C6
O
cn
i
El
O
L-
(D
N
O
U
W
Q
N
.� o
i � U
O W
Z �>
O
U)
O
E
O
C6
E
c /O
/1
• • •
w
a
a
b
Cl)
m ,o
s y
U �
Cl)
L
W
>a
U)
O
U
U)
a
�
O
N
�
U
�
�
O
4
N
�
U
+�
U
•-
>
N
c�
N
E
O
U
E
'C
O
E
•n
m
�_
cn
•�
0
4-0
>
•n
E
>
i
o
0
a�
},
Q
(�
L
cn
C6
"
>
•n
a
L
U
4-0
L
E
}+
>
>
•>
C6
O
cn
i
El
O
L-
(D
N
O
U
W
Q
N
.� o
i � U
O W
Z �>
O
U)
O
E
O
C6
E
c /O
/1
• • •
w
a
a
b
Cl)
m ,o
s y
U �
Cl)
L
W
>a
L
L
m
s
V
c�
L
U
■
s
U
L
a .
a
�J
a
a
LA-
b
F-
L N
d �
V �
i C
U �
m Y
L
Q
-U
w
>a
L
L
m
Ja
Al
L
U
OF
L
El
rr:
a
�J
a
a
LA-
4=
z
b
F-
a.+
L N
d �
V �
i C
U Cl)
m Y
L
Q
-U
w
>a
L
L
m
Ja
Al
L
U
OF
U
L
El
w
(4
Lj-
0
z
b
F-
r.+
L N
d �
V �
m O
U Cl)
d Y
L
O
-U
w
>a
L
V
L
m
s
Al
L
s
v
L
a�
LM
D
.x
LU
L
O U
O
N >,
'a U
4-0
U)
O O
C6 �
N
>
O
CL W
O U)
= m
Lu -r-
0
E
`N O
L.f_ LIJ
•
O
Q
.S
Cn
J
C6
C6
U
U
C6
nV ,!
W
c�
c�
LZ
U)
N
E
.O
U)
N
4-0
n�
W
nE
W
O
O
cn
c�
O
U
z;
J
a
b
F-
Cl)
(D
' CO
U)
`)
>
a)
m
s
Cl)
\
O
E
U
� 0
_O
U
U)LLmO
O
Cn
w
>a
L
L
m
s
Al
i
V
s
V
L
U
W
0-
O
U)
O
U)
I
u
N
N
N
N
*.
(,,
D
�
o
U
N
�
rl
a)
EL
o
_O C:
O O
� • cn
_ •O
•
---i
.(D
C6
E
O
cn
cn
E
cn
U
N
Q
cn
m
N
E
O
U)
O
L
O
a)
a�
c�
O
C6
W
cn
O
U
c�
L
U
i
C6
I
•
Cam•
0
U
C6
��
a
(4
Q
F-
A
m ,o
s y
U �
Cl)
o
L
—U
W
>a
a
C�
D
O
N
C
d
d
W
V
V
cn
U)
♦, .o
L x
0 w
'� rl
ry
� �r s ��✓
y 1
w,
a
�J
a
ti
a
z
a� 04
m O
s y
U �
Cl)
0) L
o
W
>a
a
t�
0
0
N
d
d
W
V
V
4�
cn
N
O
L
O
cQ ft
U)
O
.U)
ca
QL
X
LLI
L.L
•
N
U
O
H
4-0
W
L
U
Y
U
N
U)
=3
C:
_0
O
.0
Q- V
00
Z
• •
O
.U)
O
E
O
L
I..L
•
N
U
C6
O
ca
m
a)
4-0
^O
a_
a_
(D
0
•
0
O
O
4-0
.M�
W
•
w
(4
a
a
a� 04
m ,o
s y
U �
L
W
>a
a
t�
0
4
O
N
d
d
W
u
■�
cn
l
��, in '� r
Uv
f �J
ov ;�,L• /.`
C
as "tl m cEaLmN � mod•. ii N.. �.� a
a._m.. ryyi ou
3�a a•ro, ^� dam ;D'2 °
�d 6.
r6 0
va 3S k2 tp-$
q �
£ �-15
LA-
G
3wm� merry �`�7a��
1 r
r 4
k
L mC14
�
/ � na C -�� O
/
�/
r �� °�� ����� s N
=ter _ ao�
FR�v�Q °nom () cn
, - w
U c L, � a o L m N a b
maa�Am' V LU
F- ae�,. ::o`sQ � ¢�s�y� Woo
a
C7
D
O
N
d
d
WI
V
V
4�
cn
O
L
L
O
cQ ft
O
C
i
•
.r _' e
�y i gr
a
�J
I
1L
d
4
s y
U �
Cl)
o
L
W
>a
am
t�
0
0
a�
a�
(1)
E
A-,
a
ti
Cl)
04
m 0
(1)
Cl)
o
LU
CL
O
Cf)
Cl)
A-,
a
ti
Cl)
04
m 0
(1)
Cl)
o
LU
CL
a
C7
D
O
N
d
d
W
V
V
cn
� L
O O
N �
� N
(6 �
N �
• L (6
� N
� N
N
� O
N �
•� cn
o �
Xa�
CL
O U
T � �
W 2:N�•ca
(3) O m j
010
Z;
i
0
�,
N
O
O
�
�
V
L
C13
�
�
U)
��
U
c
(6
�
0
w
�
co
J
�
L
L.L
U
� L
O O
N �
� N
(6 �
N �
• L (6
� N
� N
N
� O
N �
•� cn
o �
Xa�
CL
O U
T � �
W 2:N�•ca
(3) O m j
010
Z;
ca
0
�,
_U)
�
O
(6
�
w
cl
L.L
U
N
_0
O
J
J
Z;
ca
�,
�
O
(6
N
�
4
�
N
�
U)
>
O)O
+-
N
X
N
d
70
O
Z3
C:
o
o
C-)
N
O
N
U
�
�
N
�+
--
•°
Q
4-j
C
cn
U
ai
4-j
Y
cn
T o
> U
J
��
O
am
0
U)
E
cn
0 N
xi, 41
a
ti
Cl)
04
m 0
o
LU
CL
0
CO
0
4.0
4)
0 N
xi, 41
a
ti
Cl)
04
m 0
o
LU
CL
a
t�
0
0
(1)
a�
a�
w
v
a�
cn
O
L �
L CZ 1.
O :w 1
4.0 J
4)
0
t
w
kl�#
a
ti
a
z
a
F--
i N
d �
m .O
S N
U �
Cl)
0) L
o
W
>a
a
C7
D
O
N
d
d
WI
V
V
4�
cn
-1--+
O
U
W M
M
O
M
M }'
O N
C6 �,
O Co
4-0 E
ca �
� O
E5 o
O m
O
O
O E
0-0
Z) z
N
O
C`7
�
U
O
C6
O
L
=
O
V
co
cn
m
co
U
-1--+
O
U
W M
M
O
M
M }'
O N
C6 �,
O Co
4-0 E
ca �
� O
E5 o
O m
O
O
O E
0-0
Z) z
N
C�
W
C`7
�
O
�
O
L
C�
• •
�J
W
cn
O
U
•�
cn
W
U
L
O
O
cn
O_
•L
�
.—
M
a
�•
L
O
j
L
O
�
N
_O
_O
m
O
m
O
O
O
=
Q
=
in
0
O
O
L
' w
>a
• •
a
C7
D
O
N
d
d
W
V
V
cn
C C O p W
O C
N-E N 'j V
mom' ..+ �_ y
V
0
Q N O T N
N
L C L U7
fLll
Q�j N
ILII
N N V i UI O
Of
-6 W
p -O
C Q Q1
rt N
IJII C N
Itl C N
T b L N
N
J p_
V p
C
_0
2 V .L.+
V m s
a>
LU
v N p
m W
Z IG N
Ol
N
Q 7 N 0
10 l9 r N
V
42
Ca
O
15 E
Z
n �
V
m m w v n
E v
C
–_ c �ti
.2 ro c
L
W
_
2
J O1 N
-p > .'.+
•—
O
_ v vQi
uJi n
v v v n
4 a) m
i
�
o
�
ic.
N
•U
�
N
�
N
�
�
Co
CO
V
Ca
N
co
N
•-
a
Co
LU
CO
CO
L
N
Co
Q
W
V
V!
O �
V
•
•
w
}
d
b
F-
m •o
� N
s m
U Cl)
a� Y
L
cC p
•(� W
>a
a
C�
D
4
O
N
d
d
W
A
V
to
v
c
L �
0 �
O
a
�J
a
z
a
L ,o
s y
U �
mCl)
L
o
-U
w
>a
a
D
O
N
C
d
d
W
W
v
cn
a�
c�
cn
L
0
0
Al
U)
0
m
QL
U)
stoo
U
•
Z%
a
LA-
a
z
4
m O
U Cl)
o
d Y
L
—U
w
>a
(1)
Cl)
x
Z
-U
O
u
0
O
4-0
O
c�
QL
Z)
•
W
^V! W
W
}+ L
O �
O U
O �
O �
O �
U
C6
o U
�w
4-0
O U_
O
4-0
Co
>
W O
•
a
�J
a
b
m .o
s y
U �
L
� o
-U
W
>a
U
w
n
U
O
E
4-0
O
4--a
:z
O
0
-O
a)
a)
O
O
Se
>
O
O
O
a)
-0
c�
O
•
O
H
a
�J
a
b
m .o
s y
U �
L
� o
-U
W
>a
1
w
(4
Lj-
0
z
b
F-
r.+
L N
d �
V �
M O
U Cl)
d Y
L
O
—U
W w
>a
w Lj-
(4
0
z
b
F-
r.+
L N
d �
V �
m O
U
d Cl) Y
L
O
—U
W w
>a
Ad Name: 10362537A
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM
Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33
Vail Daily
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO }
}SS.
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified
representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper
printed, in whole or in part and published in the County
of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation
therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first
publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and
that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice
and advertisement as requested.
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every
number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1
consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 7/11/2014 and
that the last publication of said notice was dated 7/11/2014 in
the issue of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
07/29/2014.
General Man ager/Publisher/Editor
Vail Daily
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 07/29/2014.
� 2m.&& 9. -V-�
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public
My Commission expires: November 1, 2015
�pRY PUe/
' PAMELA J.
SCHULTZ
9�� COt -ARP$
My Commismn Expires 11/0112015
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and
Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will
hold a public hearing in accordance with section
12 -3 -6, Vail Town Code, on July 28, 2014 at 1:00
pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
A request for a final review of variances from Sec-
tions 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12- 6D -11, Park-
ing, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Requirements, Vail
Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances,
Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition
and remodel with required parking located partially
within the public right -of -way, located at 2955 Bell-
flower Drive /Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain, and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC140018)
Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented
by MJ Mueller Co
Planner: Warren Campbell
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council on a major amendment to Special Devel-
opment District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to
Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail
Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved de-
velopment plan for the Cornerstone site to facili-
tate the construction of a tensioned membrane
structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive /Un-
platted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC140019)
Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun &
Associates
Planner: Jonathan Spence
The applications and information about the propos-
als are available for public inspection during office
hours at the Town of Vail Community Develop-
ment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend site visits. Please call
970 - 479 -2138 for additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon re-
quest, with 24 -hour notification. Please call
970 - 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im-
paired, for information.
Published July 11, 2014 in the Vail
Daily. (10362537)
Ad Name: 10405643A
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM
Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33
Vail Daily
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO }
}SS.
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified
representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper
printed, in whole or in part and published in the County
of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation
therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously
and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first
publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and
that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice
and advertisement as requested.
The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every
number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1
consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said
notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 7/25/2014 and
that the last publication of said notice was dated 7/25/2014 in
the issue of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
09/24/2014.
General Man ager/Publisher/Editor
Vail Daily
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for
the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 09/24/2014.
� 2m.&& 9. -V-�
Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public
My Commission expires: November 1, 2015
�pRY PUe/
' PAMELA J.
SCHULTZ
9�� COt -ARP$
My Commismn Expires 11/0112015
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMIS-
SION
July 28, 2014 at 1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
/ PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visit: none
15 minutes
1.A request for a final review of variances from
Sections 12 -6D -6, Setbacks, Section 12- 6D -11,
Parking, and Section 14 -3 -2F, Other Require-
ments, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter
12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
residential addition and remodel with required
parking located partially within the public right -of-
way, located at 2955 Bellflower Drive /Lot 6, Block
6, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC140018)
Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters, represented
by MJ Mueller Co.
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND:VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
90 minutes
2.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council on approaches to address identified ele-
ments to ensure the special character of Vail Vil-
lage is not just maintained but also enhanced
through the Vail Village Master Plan as an out-
come of the Vail Village Character Area Preserva-
tion project, an initiative to examine the Town's cur-
rent regulations, design standards and guidelines
applicable to Vail Village.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun As-
sociates, Inc.
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION:
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONDITION(S):
3.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town
Council on a major amendment to Special Devel-
opment District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to
Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail
Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved de-
velopment plan for the Cornerstone site to facili-
tate the construction of a tensioned membrane
structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive /Un-
platted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC140019)
Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun &
Associates
Planner: Jonathan Spence
ACTION: Table to August 11, 2014
MOTION: SECOND:VOTE:
4.Approval of July 14, 2014 minutes
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
5.Information Update
6.Adjournment
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
The applications and information about the propos-
als are available for public inspection during regu-
lar office hours at the Town of Vail Community De-
velopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
The public is invited to attend the project orienta-
tion and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Develop-
ment Department. Times and order of items are
approximate, subject to change, and cannot be re-
lied upon to determine at what time the Planning
and Environmental Commission will consider an
item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional in-
formation. Sign language interpretation is available
upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call
(970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im-
paired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published July 25, 2014 in the Vail Daily.
(10405643)