Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-1013 PECTOWN OF VAIt f PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION October 13, 2014 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visit: None 120 minutes 1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan, to establish a comprehensive redevelopment plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center, Lot 10 (Town of Vail parking lot), and US Bank Building, located at 181 and 281 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West/ Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, and Lot D -2, A Resubdivision of Lot D Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140011) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 15 minutes 2. A request for a final review of a variance from Sections 12 -6C -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition within the side setback area, located at 4394 Streamside Circle Unit B /Lot 9, Bighorn Subdivision 4th Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140035) Applicant: Don & Kathy Vestal, represented by Custom Mountain Architects Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 45 minutes 3. A request for the review of a development plan, pursuant to Section 12 -8E -6, Development Plan, Vail Town Code and a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -8E -3, Conditional Use, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Ski and Snowboard Vail Club Vail site with a new private and public club and multi - family residential dwelling units, located at 598 Vail Valley Drive /Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140020, PEC140023) Applicant: Ski and Snowboard Club Vail, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 15 minutes 4. A request for the review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for the re- subdivision of Parcel 1 of the Golden Peak Ski Base And Recreation District Parcel and Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, in order to establish Parcel 3, Golden Peak Ski Base And Recreation District Parcel, the redevelopment site for Ski and Snowboard Page 1 Club Vail, located at 460 and 598 Vail Valley Drive /Parcel 1, Golden Peak Ski Base and Recreation District Parcel, and Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140021) Applicant: Ski and Snowboard Club Vail and Vail Corporation, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 5. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved development plan for the Cornerstone site to facilitate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive /Unplatted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140019) Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 6. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -9C- 3, Conditional Uses, to allow for improvements to a public park and active outdoor recreation area, facility, and use (restroom and picnic pavilion) on the Lower Bench of Ford Park, located at 530 South Frontage Road East /Un platted (Ford Park), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140024) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Greg Hall Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 7. A request for the review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the realignment of a shared property line resulting in no net change in lot areas, located at 103 and 107 Rockledge Road /Lots 4 and 7, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140034) Applicant: Gary and Susan Rosenbach, represented by KH Webb Architects Planner: Joe Batcheler ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 8. Approval of September 22, 2014 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 9. Information Update 10. Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning Page 2 and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published October 5, 2014 in the Vail Daily. Page 3 TOWN OF VAIL PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION October 13, 2014 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT Henry Pratt Luke Cartin John Rediker Pam Hopkins Michael Kurz Dick Cleveland MEMBERS ABSENT Webb Martin Site Visit: None 120 minutes 1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan, to establish a comprehensive redevelopment plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center, Lot 10 (Town of Vail parking lot), and US Bank Building, located at 181 and 281 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West/ Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, and Lot D -2, A Resubdivision of Lot D Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140011) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 5 -0 -1 (Cleveland recused) Commissioner Cleveland recused himself due to his involvement with the hospital. Warren Campbell gave a presentation covering the staff memorandum. Campbell outlined the plan for the hearing and the item of loading and delivery and traffic was the first item presented for discussion. Charlie Crevling, Chief Financial Officer, introduced himself and thanked the town staff, community and PEC for their work on this master plan. He added that the WMC is taking the process seriously which is exhibited by the resources they have brought on board to address the various topics included within the master plan. Tom Braun, representing the applicant, began with a follow up to the earlier work session with answers to some of the questions posed. These included questions concerning ambulance traffic counts, enforceability of provisions, inclusion of the US Bank parcel and the west lot in the master plan, and the possibility of loading and delivery off of the frontage road. Russ Sedmak, architect for the WMC, embellished on the topic of access to the site from the frontage road and access from West Meadow Drive. Russ walked through how the access from the frontage road is proposed to work including internal motor vehicle turning movements. Russ outlined the challenges posed with development sequencing, existing private covenants and the desired elevation of the main hospital floor. Skip Hudson, traffic consultant for the VVMC, outlined his findings based on actual traffic counts. He stated that they had performed the traffic counts in the past week. Page 1 Commissioner Hopkins questioned if seasonality affected traffic counts as the previous week would have been a slower time potentially in town. Charlie Crevling described how loading and delivery would only be a few trips greater during the busier winter season as more medical supplies were needed daily. Hudson continued presenting his data including peak hour activities and what percent of traffic loading and delivery account for on West Meadow Drive. The analysis showed that the WMC loading and delivery would be approximately 9% of the traffic on West Meadow Drive after the hospital user groups were relocated to the South Frontage Road. Commissioner Pratt requested clarification on the traffic counts shown in the slide. Hudson walked the Commission through the numbers. He explained that the table did not include any traffic trips for WMC except the remaining loading and delivery. Commissioner Hopkins asked if doctors would be using West Meadow Drive for access. Hudson explained that doctors, employees, patients, visitors, and ambulances would use the South Frontage Road for access. Commissioner Cartin asked about time frames that loading and delivery vehicles took to offload materials. . Hudson provided some greater detail in the functioning of the loading and delivery facility currently. Braun returned to discuss how the proposed loading and delivery would function in comparison to existing conditions and reiterated the proposed reduction in overall traffic. Braun stressed the relocation of the front door. Braun walked through how vehicles of different sizes would use the proposed facility. Proposed landscape treatments were presented. Commissioner Kurz interjected stated his belief that a management plan would be needed for the loading and delivery facility. He highlighted the need to maintain site distance triangles so loading and delivery vehicles could clearly see the various user groups and vehicles on West Meadow Drive. Braun discussed access to the site by large vehicles that would not use the interior facility. Vehicles larger than a SU30 would be utilizing the west parking lot. Braun showed several site plans showing turning movements of the larger vehicles in the parking lot. Hopkins inquired about pedestrian access from West Meadow Drive to the South Frontage Road. Braun explained the anticipated indoor and outdoor circulation for pedestrians. Kurz commented on public art and the recognition of limited space along West Meadow Drive as contemplated in the Streetscape Master Plan. Campbell explained that the installation of public art would be contemplated to occur along the length of the VVMC West Meadow Drive Frontage not necessarily in the proximity of the loading and delivery facility. Page 2 Jim Lamont, Vail Village HOA, asked about VVMC's down valley facility and its potential for expanded transfer use for larger vehicles. Off site transfer may be a viable solution. He spoke to the improvements made to the loading and delivery operation of the WMC since the last hearing when he provided numerous photos of existing conditions. He felt that the improvements made in under two weeks shows that management and oversight of the operations can result in positive improvements. Jim questioned the lack of independent validation of traffic counts and analysis. Requested verification of West Meadow Drive traffic numbers. Spoke to a need to trust but verify collected data. He described the increasing use of West Meadow Drive for recreational users. Spoke to enforcement of management plans and necessary trip points that require action. Spoke to his recent observations and solutions that move truck operation onto WMC property and the west lot as opposed to the proposed indoor loading facility. Suggested an enclosed facility on the west parking lot may be more appropriate. Feels master plan only speaks to a snapshot in time as opposed to a fluid, evolving situation. Spoke to covenants on the property and the ability to renegotiate them. There should be options in the master plan which anticipate the possible renegotiation of covenants on the property. Richard Leibhaber, resident /property owner, spoke to the need to take all homeowners' concerns into account. Gwen Scalpello asked for details regarding the traffic counts Braun and Hudson spoke to the methodology used for generating traffic counts. Tom mentioned that an off site loading facility is still under consideration. Commissioner Pratt stated that the master plan is not adopting a specific plan but is detailing a utopian idea for what should occur on the site in the future as a guide for the review of specific development plans. Commissioner Rediker stated the applicant has done a good job analyzing the loading and delivery issue and the residential owners have some valid concerns. John spoke to Kurz's comment about landscaping and negative impacts to site triangle visibility. John stated loading and delivery off of West Meadow Drive was appropriate. Commissioner Kurz stated this process was touching upon the actual design of the site and that a broader viewpoint is needed. He suggested the master plan include language speaking to the goal of minimizing traffic on West meadow Drive with every possible opportunity. Commissioner Hopkins suggested that any future management plan for loading and delivery include periodic reviews. She asked for more detail on the pedestrian circulation on site. Commissioner Cartin asked for the reasoning behind the location of the oxygen tank. Luke asked for a broader view within the master plan in regards to the possibility of other loading and delivery solutions in the future. Commissioner Pratt agreed that the master plan should remain goal oriented. Henry expressed trepidation with incorporating a management plan that gets forgotten about. He suggested looking for design solutions to address concerns and eliminate them from arising. Commissioner Rediker felt the goals of loading and delivery need to be practical and feasible, and not prohibitive to the function of the hospital. Page 3 Kurz thought a traffic management plan for Meadow Drive is needed, or something to that effect, so that all modes of transportation are given proper consideration. Cartin asked for clarification on Jim Lamont's vision for a loading facility. Lamont spoke to various types of facilities with which he is familiar. He suggested that anytime deliveries could arrive in smaller trucks that could use the South Frontage road entrance it would result in fewer trucks on West Meadow Drive. Warren Campbell then briefly presented Staff's position on traffic and circulation. Staff would like to know the PEC's preference in regards to the South Frontage Road improvements. Hudson then presented the hospital's concerns about the proposed options for improvements to the South Frontage Road. He felt it was premature to choose a preferred option. Braun discussed the pros and cons of the various options under consideration for the South Frontage Road improvements. Commissioner Kurz asked if the Evergreen can locate its entrance to the west. Tom Braun said all options are still on the table and would need to be evaluated during the review of its development plan. Commissioner Pratt asked if it was premature to review this. Warren Campbell stated no — that given the amount of time to complete the master plan November 24, it needs to be looked at now. Commissioner Cartin asked for staff to speak to the need for a round -about and the challenges associated with the non - round -about options. Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, spoke to the need to restrict /eliminate left turn movements. The roundabout was being designed to accommodate the future anticipated growth in traffic on the frontage road. With properties being limited to right -in right -out movements a roundabout was need to allow for vehicles to turn around and head in the direction desired. Lamont, Vail Village HOA, stated that after looking at all the frontage road options, the roundabout option took the most pressure off the Main Vail roundabout and provided the best option for the WMC to have complete access off the South Frontage Road. He then discussed the need to consider the movement of people from site to site within the study area. There are some strategic opportunities to bolster the civic amenities in the area and to ignore that would be a mistake. The redeveloped Evergreen and municipal sites will increase traffic generation. Pedestrian connectivity must be given equal footing as vehicular connectivity. He suggested it would be appropriate for either a tunnel or elevated walkway from the proposed municipal parking structure south across the frontage road for pedestrians. We have tipped from a rural town to a urban town (which is not a bad thing). A pedestrian crossing needs to be included in this conversation. Commissioner Hopkins agreed with Jim. Commissioner Cartin asked that the traffic solution be a coordinated effort between all three adjacent properties. Page 4 Commissioner Kurz agreed with Hopkins and Lamont regarding the need to give some attention to the pedestrian. Commissioner Pratt felt the traffic solution needs to address all three properties. He also agreed a tunnel or some other solution should be explored for pedestrians. Hudson stated that pedestrians are being considered in the design. George Ruther stated that all traffic studies and resulting design solutions will be included in additional planning documents, such as the Town of Vail Transportation Master Plan. Jim Lamont mentioned is would be wise for the master plan to speak to the decision making process as to why a particular option is preferred. Warren Campbell introduced the subject of parking and different methodologies for determining parking requirements. Warren highlighted that the GU zone district does allow the PEC to determine the actual parking demand. Braun stated that the goal, to be included in the master plan, is to address any deficit and to provide all needed parking on site. Braun discussed the methodology used, known as Method #2. Spoke to decompression as opposed to additional employee generation. Hopkins questioned how shift changes effect parking requirement. Braun acknowledged the question and spoke to ongoing discussions and proposed inclusions in the CUP process. Lamont spoke to the complexities of the medical center, ongoing rehabilitation operations (contractors, etc.), and the need to recognize the need for these workers who are not actually employees of the medical center to have access to parking. Spoke to setting aside spaces for these users. The commission spoke in general support of the methodology contained in Method 2 for parking need determination. Commissioner Pratt requested an option for valet parking be included in the master plan. Pratt suggested contractor parking may be accommodated in the interior loading and delivery area. Questioned counting US Bank building parking but not the demand. Braun clarified that both the demand and supply were considered in the case of the US Bank building. Campbell introduced the subject of building bulk, mass and scale. Spoke to the GU zone district and looking to neighboring properties for context. Spoke to one level of concern at the master plan level, that being the southeast corner of the building near the proposed loading and delivery area. Spoke to setbacks and anticipated bulk and mass. Braun spoke to building levels and context including allowable heights of neighboring buildings under zoning. Sedmak spoke in general to the building mass and scale and that the massing models do not illustrate the fenestration that will be proposed at the CUP level. Spoke to roof elements, Page 5 transparency, screening of mechanicals, streetscape and other similar items that will be worked through and shown at the CUP level. Lamont feels that the design issues will be more evident at the development review stage. Spoke to the success of the passageway along the west side of the Four Seasons property and the need for a north /south pedestrian walkway on the east side of hospital site. It could serve dual purpose for pedestrian circulation and a landscaping buffer between adjacent properties. Commissioner Hopkins spoke the need to soften facades. Supports the pedestrian way along the east property. Commissioner Kurz supports setbacks because of the anticipated bulk and mass. He highlighted the need to give attention to the southeast corner and its articulation. Brought up the idea of areas of respite in nature for patrons and visitors of the campus. Specifically the potential for Middle Creek. Commissioner Pratt questioned setbacks along the south property line because of the lack of shadows created on the street. Strongly supports the north -south pedestrian connection along the east property line. Would like to see inclusion of language in the master plan about setbacks in this area and avoidance of institutional architecture. Campbell introduced the topic of employee housing and the language that is proposed in the master plan mirroring the language in the Vail Town Code. Braun spoke in general to this topic and what would be addressed at the CUP level. Mentioned existing VVMC employee housing and the desire to mitigate offsite for future employee generation because of limitations and conflicts on site. Commissioner Rediker supports the applicant's proposal that on site is not appropriate. Commissioner Kurz concurred with Rediker. Commissioners Hopkins and Cartin also support off site and the use of all on site space for hospital related activities. Commissioner Pratt also agrees. Campbell introduced the topic of Middle Creek and the need for significant improvement on how the site relates to the creek. Mentioned need for a heightened awareness regarding the environmental effects. Braun spoke to additional language proposed for the master plan and what would be seen at a future hearing with the adoption of the final master plan. Commissioner Cartin spoke to the need for the Town to look at their side of the creek as well. Comprehensive approach needed. Commissioner Hopkins agrees with making the creek an amenity. Commissioner Rediker supports the additional language proposed by Braun and recommended the inclusion of language concerning riparian plantings. Commissioner Kurz agrees. Page 6 Commissioner Pratt encouraged the inclusion of additional language concerning amenities. Spoke to the need for greater attention in general to the Town's north /south creeks. Jim Lamont spoke to the compressor noise at the southwest corner of the property and the need to address that in Phase 1. Jim mentioned the need to step up the approach to urban runoff and its treatment. Need to differentiate between different types of runoff. Spoke to mechanical treatment as opposed to retention /detention. Encourages a proactive approach. He concluded by suggesting the potential for a wildlife corridor along Middle Creek and the potential to remove the grates from the culverts to allow for animal movement. Campbell reviewed the applications and processes moving forward including revisions to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, Town of Vail Transportation Master Plan, Town of Vail land Use Master Plan, etc. Braun wrapped up and thanked the Commission for their time. 15 minutes 2. A request for a final review of a variance from Sections 12 -6C -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition within the side setback area, located at 4394 Streamside Circle Unit B /Lot 9, Bighorn Subdivision 4th Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140035) Applicant: Don & Kathy Vestal, represented by Custom Mountain Architects Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Approve with condition(s) MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 6 -0 -0 CONDITION(S): 1. Approval of this variance is contingent upon the applicants obtaining Town of Vail design review approval for this proposal. 2. Prior to requesting any final planning inspection, the applicant shall have recorded a revised duplex subdivision plat with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder that accurately reflects the improvements on the property. Jonathan Spence delivered a presentation based on Staff's memorandum. Commissioner Kurz asked if the neighbors had any issues. Spence indicated all neighbors were notified and one reached out to Staff to express support. Commissioner Cartin asked if the steam setback would be encroached upon. Spence answered, no. Commissioner all spoke in support of the application. There was no public comment. 45 minutes 3. A request for the review of a development plan, pursuant to Section 12 -8E -6, Development Plan, Vail Town Code and a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -8E -3, Conditional Use, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Ski and Snowboard Vail Club Vail site with a new private and public club and multi - family residential dwelling units, located at 598 Vail Valley Page 7 Drive /Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140020, PEC140023) Applicant: Ski and Snowboard Club Vail, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0 Commissioner Pratt introduced the application. Cartin clarified his reason for recusing himself last time this item was heard and why he not recusing himself this time. Jonathan Spence delivered a presentation based on Staff's memorandum. Spence asked the PEC to speak to the three items in Section VIII of Staff's memorandum and anything else deemed relevant. Tom Braun delivered a presentation on the background of the ski cub, its functions and needs, and the nature of the proposal. Commissioner Kurz asked about the rezoning process and the timing of the development plan. Tom stated the approval of the development plan was contingent upon the rezoning. Rediker asked for clarification — how the timing worked in regards to conveyance. Kyle Webb then presented the proposed design and the parameters driving the design. Tom Braun then spoke to employee housing, parking, and traffic /circulation. Commissioner Cartin asked if the drop -off lanes would allow for flexibility as is the case now where temporary parking spaces are sometimes allowed. Commissioner Cleveland asked how many employees use the Village parking structure. Tom replied few if any. Commissioner Pratt asked who the primary users of the 24 parking spaces would be. Tom replied it would be coaches and employees. Pratt asked about trailer parking and equipment drop -off. Tom explained how the site functions now and how the proposed site would function. Tom then spoke to traffic and circulation. Commissioner Kurz asked about capacity and what the capping mechanism is for the ski club. Dave Viele discussed the model the ski uses. It is dependent upon a few variables. Quality is the main driver. Snow space is another driver. Commissioner Cleveland asked for clarity on the circulation of the drop -off lanes. Dick also asked for traffic counts. Tom explained the circulation. Tom did not have clear figures on the traffic counts. Dick made the point that on- street circulation must improve as a result of this proposal. Tom said that the ski club is considering off site drop -off areas and that a management plan could be part of this process. Dick expressed some concerns regarding bulk, mass, and height. Spence said the neighbors have been consulted throughout the process in this regard. Phil Hoversten of the ski club spoke to the engagement process with the neighbors, specifically a mock up of height for the Manor Vail condo owners. Commissioner Cartin spoke to the potential of having a pull -off area for trucks with small trailers to unload equipment. Page 8 Tom Braun spoke to the fact that teams with trailers arrive early and are gone before drop -off occurs. Commissioner Pratt asked if the expanded site is affecting the children's center at all. Tom Braun stated there was no negative impact to the children's ski center. Commissioner Pratt inquired as to the amount of floor area designated for administrative offices. Is that 9 -5 office space? Kyle Webb detailed the reasoning behind the various areas devoted to coaches. He described the hours that coaches would be utilizing the space. Commissioner Rediker inquired into the impacts of the travel lanes above affecting the employee housing unit quality of life. Kyle Webb stated that the construction of the employee housing units would be such that the vehicles above would be isolated by concrete. Commissioner Cartin spoke to the need for the redevelopment. Commissioner Cleveland spoke to the appearance that the significant issues seems to have been addressed. Commissioner Pratt felt it was an elegant building and felt the EHUs on site were great. The parking analysis should take into account providing parking for the EHUS. He also spoke to his concerns about encouraging and directing users to utilize Vail Valley Drive east to the Golf Course. 15 minutes 4. A request for the review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for the re- subdivision of Parcel 1 of the Golden Peak Ski Base And Recreation District Parcel and Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, in order to establish Parcel 3, Golden Peak Ski Base And Recreation District Parcel, the redevelopment site for Ski and Snowboard Club Vail, located at 460 and 598 Vail Valley Drive /Parcel 1, Golden Peak Ski Base and Recreation District Parcel, and Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140021) Applicant: Ski and Snowboard Club Vail and Vail Corporation, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0 5. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved development plan for the Cornerstone site to facilitate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive /Unplatted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140019) Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0 Page 9 6. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -9C- 3, Conditional Uses, to allow for improvements to a public park and active outdoor recreation area, facility, and use (restroom and picnic pavilion) on the Lower Bench of Ford Park, located at 530 South Frontage Road East /Un platted (Ford Park), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140024) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Greg Hall Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0 7. A request for the review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the realignment of a shared property line resulting in no net change in lot areas, located at 103 and 107 Rockledge Road /Lots 4 and 7, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140034) Applicant: Gary and Susan Rosenbach, represented by KH Webb Architects Planner: Joe Batcheler ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6 -0 -0 8. Approval of September 22, 2014 minutes MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6 -0 -0 9. Information Update 10. Adjournment MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6 -0 -0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published October 5, 2014 in the Vail Daily. Page 10 TOWN OF VAIL t Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: October 13, 2014 SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan, to establish a comprehensive redevelopment plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center, Lot 10 (Town of Vail parking lot), and US Bank Building, located at 181 and 281 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West/ Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, and Lot D -2, A Resubdivision of Lot D Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details it regard thereto. (PEC140011) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Warren Campbell I. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant, Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC), represented by Braun and Associates, is requesting a public hearing with the Planning and Environmental Commission to continue the review of the proposed Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan (VVMC MP), dated August, 2014 (Attachment A). The public hearing will include: • responses by the VVMC to questions raised at the September 22nd hearing where loading and delivery was discussed, • a discussion of traffic and circulation, parking, bulk and mass, employee housing and Middle Creek, • opportunity for public participation, and • a schedule of next steps. As this public hearing will limit the scope of discussion to the topics listed above, which are elements proposed VVMC MP, staff has not prepared a recommendation for any action by the Planning and Environmental Commission. Town staff will provide a recommendation at the November 24, 2014 public hearing. II. DISCUSSION ITEMS The end result of the master planning process is to create a facilities master plan for the VVMC campus. As such, the plan will be used primarily by VVMC to help guide and direct future decisions for development on the VVMC campus. While many aspects and elements of the plan have little, or no relevance, on the Town of Vail or the immediate neighborhood (i.e., interior layout of the buildings, sequencing of construction, size of the emergency generator, etc.), there are many other aspects or elements of the plan which will. For example, elements such as parking; pedestrian circulation; loading and delivery; bulk, mass and scale; vehicular access, etc. For that reason, it is imperative that input from the community and other potentially impacted parties is taken throughout the master planning process. These design solutions and options for the implementation of these elements will become part of the master plan. Once incorporated into the Vail Land Use Plan, the master plan will be used as a benchmark for evaluating development plan proposals provided as part of a conditional use permit application. Further, portions of the master plan should be created with the expressed intent and goal of its inclusion in the Vail's Comprehensive Plan. Through its inclusion in Vail's Comprehensive Plan, the master plan becomes pertinent and relevant to future development review processes and actions by the Town. In order to achieve this goal, the Vail Land Use Plan should be amended to include those aspects or elements of the master facilities plan which bear relevance on the Town of Vail and the immediate neighborhood. Loading and Delivery Proposed VVMC MP Text The applicant is proposing to replace the language include in the initial draft of the VVMC MP (Attachment A) with the following language. The following language is in response to the discussion on September 22"d The language addressing Loading and Service in the VVMC MP is as follows: Existing Conditions VVMC has a wide variety of delivery and service needs that are essential to the operation of its facility and vital to providing quality patient care. Examples of products regularly delivered to VVMC include linens and laundry, food supplies, equipment, and medical and surgical supplies. Deliveries to VVMC occur three different ways: 1. Most deliveries are made by vendors who deliver directly to the Vail campus. 2. VVMC also has a down - valley facility in Gypsum where medical and surgical supplies are warehoused and delivered daily to the Vail campus by VVMC vans on an "as needed" basis. 3. Finally, a third party contractor makes daily deliveries of medical and surgical supplies from a warehouse in Denver. Town of Vail Page 2 On average, 24 service and delivery vehicles serve VVMC each day (resulting in 48 total trips on West Meadow Drive). These 24 trips include vendor vehicles, VVMC courier vans and VVMC service vehicles (vans). On the 'peak day" (Mondays) on average 29 service and delivery vehicles serve VVMC. The majority of vendor deliveries are made in mid -sized trucks (SU -30) or smaller. Typically only four deliveries are made by larger trucks (articulated vehicles or WB -40 trucks) each week. On rare occasions, larger semi -truck service VVMC. Examples of these include the delivery of new beds (that may occur once each year) and the periodic need for a temporary generator to service the hospital. VVMC's existing delivery is handled in a small, open air area at the southeast corner of the campus immediately adjacent to West Meadow Drive. The loading area is large enough to accommodate two mid -sized trucks and also includes a trash /dumpster area. Portions of the loading area are screened by fencing. Currently there is no delineation between the loading area and the adjoining sidewalk, nor is there a clear demarcation between the road, the sidewalk and the loading area. These conditions make it difficult to manage where trucks stage while making deliveries. The limited size of the area requires trucks to back onto West Meadow Drive, creating safety concerns along this heavily travelled pedestrian roadway. The goal for delivery and service functions at VVMC is to. Design and manage loading and delivery facilities and functions to meet the needs of VVMC while at the same time minimizing potentially adverse impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood and on West Meadow Drive. Alternative Approaches to Delivery and Service One of the main goals of the Master Plan for VVMC is to establish a new "front door" at South Frontage Road and in doing so remove as much traffic as possible from West Meadow Drive. VVMC generates a variety of different types of vehicular trips — delivery trucks, service vehicles, patients, guests, employees, vendors and emergency vehicles. Each group of users has their own unique design considerations for how they are accommodated. While expansion plans will establish a new front door at the South Frontage Road, due to limited site area and road frontage, not all vehicle trips generated by VVMC can be accommodated at this location. This raises the question of which VVMC vehicle trips should be shifted to the new front door and which trips should remain on West Meadow Drive. The best possible long term solution for Meadow Drive should be to eliminate as much traffic from this road as possible. In order to do so delivery and service vehicles should continue to use West Meadow Drive to access VVMC and all other traffic should access VVMC via the new front door. This solution will remove the vast majority of VVMC vehicle trips from Meadow Drive and, in doing Town of Vail Page 3 so, dramatically reduce the amount of traffic on this road. This reduction in vehicular traffic, coupled with a well - design and properly managed loading facility will balance the operational needs of VVMC while providing a major community benefit to West Meadow Drive. Performance Standards The following design and management parameters address safety, aesthetics, noise, odor, congestions and other considerations to a loading facility on West Meadow Drive. Each of these parameters shall be addressed by detailed plans submitted as a part of the Conditional Use Permit application. The design and management of a loading facility that conforms to these parameters, as determined by the PEC, will ensure the compatibility of the loading facility with the surrounding residential neighborhood and with the pedestrian nature of West Meadow Drive. Site and Loadinq Facility Design Parameters • Loading docks and loading activity shall be located inside the building. • The number of loading bays within the facility should range from between 3 -4 and accommodate turning movements (within the facility) for SU -30 sized trucks. • Trash and recycling shall be located inside the building. • Streetscape and landscape improvements adjacent to the loading facility should be designed to define distinct spaces for pedestrians and for trucks, and should discourage truck parking on West Meadow Drive. The West Lot Design Parameters • Provisions to accommodate oxygen truck deliveries. • Provide space suitable to accommodate the occasional delivery from a WB -40 truck. • Provide parking for VVMC service vehicles (to be accessed from the South Frontage Road). Aesthetics • Exterior materials and architectural treatments should be consistent with those on rest of building. • Venting shall be brought through building to rooftop exhaust. • Exterior lighting shall conform to TO lighting ordiancne and include timer - controlled night time cut -offs. Loading Facility Management Plan • Outline the role /responsibility of the Loading Dock Manger. • Establish protocol for how the facility will be managed (hours of operation, coordinating times of deliveries, managing the size of trucks that deliver to the VVMC, accommodating periodic deliveries by larger trucks, servicing the US Bank Building, etc.) Town of Vail Page 4 Establish "rules of the facility ", i.e no backing onto West meadow Drive, no parking on West Meadow Drive (provisions made a part of CUP approval and enforceable by TOV) Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed VVMC MP text regarding loading and service and has the following comments and questions for consideration by the VVMC and the Planning and Environmental Commission. The proposed VVMC MP loading and delivery language more clearly articulates the problem and possible solutions than the previously language. o Staff recommends that the language be amended to highlight that the existing facility is undersized /inadequate and there are times when the number of deliveries exceed the capacity of the facility. Within the body of the proposed loading and delivery text there are two goals of the MP detailed. o The goal for loading and delivery and establishment of a new "front door" ■ Staff will be looking for goals /objectives and action items to be not only contained within the body of the text for each topical area but in a stand alone section /chapter of the VVMC MP, such as an executive summary. • The proposed VVMC MP loading and delivery language shall include a reference to Chapter 12 -10, Off Street Parking and Loading, and Section 12- 9C-5, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, as regulations to be adhered to during the review of future conditional use applications. • Staff recommends renaming the title Site and Loading Facility Design Parameters to Enclosed Loading Facility Design Parameters which would more clearly distinguish the elements within this section from the elements of loading and delivery proposed to occur on the west parking lot. • The VVMC MP text under the heading of Loading Facility Management Plan shall include a statement requiring the need to review and approve a Loading facility Management Plan in conjunction with the conditional use permit application. • Staff recommends the VVMC MP loading and delivery language incorporates language similar to that found in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan to address loading and delivery as follows: o Loading and delivery facilities should be located deep enough into the property that the estimated peak volume of service vehicles does not back up into or block the access road or pedestrian areas. o Service drives and loading docks must be screened with landscaping, fencing, retaining walls or other appropriate design techniques. Town of Vail Page 5 • All reasonable measures shall be taken to prevent noise and exhaust impacts on adjacent properties. • In no case shall a property utilize the public roadway or pedestrian area to stage service and delivery vehicles. The TurnKey Consulting memorandum dated September 30, 2014, has been updated to address staff's previous comments with one exception. That exception being the use of actual trip counts versus ITE trip counts. (Attachment B) • After further discussion with the authors and obtaining a greater understanding of the intent of Table 2 to provide a basis by which to gauge the percentage of loading, delivery, and service traffic on West Meadow Drive, staff agrees ITE counts are appropriate. • Attached to the memorandum is the analysis performed to determine the loading and delivery trips to the VVMC. ■ It should be noted that the table entitled VVMC Delivery Vehicles - DAILY identifies one (1) vehicle per day on Tuesdays through Fridays as being larger than the designed loading facility. • The loading facility which has been provided in concept form with turning radii showing movement can occur within the facility is anticipated to accommodate vehicles up to a SU -30, an unarticulated delivery. The TurnKey Consulting memorandum includes analysis tables indicating that four (4) days a week a vehicle larger that a SU- 30 makes deliveries. The proposed VVMC MP loading and delivery text identifies these deliveries will occur on the west parking lot. Staff recommends that at the condition use application review of the development plan that the potential for design the loading facility to accommodate larger vehicles, up to a single WB -50 bay be explored. o The VVMC MP text should include several elements of the data found in the TurnKey Consultiing memorandum regarding the overall traffic on West Meadow Drive and the reduction to approximately 10% of VVMC loading and delivery traffic after other user groups are relocated to the new "front door ". Understanding the limitations included within the scope of this VVMC MP with regard to the US Bank building, staff would recommend identifying in the VVMC MP that additional solutions to removing loading and delivery from West Meadow Drive should be explored in the event the US Bank building is redeveloped in the future. With regard to the streetscape design in front of the loading and delivery facility and the entirety of the VVMC West Meadow Drive frontage the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan Addendum needs to be cited in the VVMC MP text as a review document to be evaluated in the conditional use application process for the development plan. Staff has attached those portion of this Master Plan for review (Attachment C). o This document speaks to the need for public art to be incorporated along the pedestrian walkway. Town of Vail Page 6 Staff has reviewed the proposed language addressing the current loading and delivery problem, possible design solutions, reports, example turning movement plans for the anticipated loading facility, and arguments for West Meadow Drive remaining the access for loading and delivery to the VVMC. Staff's conclusion is that while the ideal solution would be to eliminate all VVMC traffic from West Meadow Drive it is not practical and an approach which results in removing the greatest generators of traffic (ie. patients, employees, emergency vehicles) and is more appropriate. The proposal to relocate all traffic generation sources for the VVMC off of West Meadow Drive results in significant improvements to the number of trips on the street. However, it will be imperative during the conditional use application process for the review of the development plan to scrutinize the design and operation of the facility to address safety of pedestrians and bicyclists, aesthetics, noise, odors, size of vehicles, control of access points for west parking lot, etc. The Planning and Environmental Commission needs to answer the following question in order to provide final direction on this topic to VVMC-. Should loading and delivery access be prohibited from West Meadow Drive entirely or are there circumstances or conditions whereby loading and delivery could be permissible on West Meadow Drive? Parking Proposed VVMC MP Text Attached to this memorandum is the VVMC MP Parking Analysis dated May 13, 2014 (Attachment D). This document includes analysis beyond what will be included in the VVMC MP including floor plans, however it is provided in conjunction with the proposed language to lend creditability to the methods examined by the VVMC in order to best identify the actual parking demand. While Chapter 12 -10, Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, prescribes a parking requirement for hospitals and medical offices the General Use District includes provisions for the Planning and Environmental Commission to evaluate parking in conjunction with the conditional use application for the development plan. In summary, the provided parking analysis reviews two "Methods" for calculating the parking demand of the VVMC. Method 1 utilizes the parking requirements as found in the Town Code which are based upon square footages of various uses. Method 2 is a needs based approach which examines the use of the various facilities and the number of employees anticipated. VVMC suggests that Method 2 is more appropriate as it is more accurate in determining the actual parking need for the campus. Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed VVMC MP text regarding parking calculation methods and has the following comments and questions for consideration by the VVMC and the Planning and Environmental Commission. Town of Vail Page 7 The proposed language shall address more clearly the problem existing on the VVMC site with regarding to the parking deficit. o Discuss the existing shortage more directly. The language does discuss how the shortage is address through off site agreements, bus passes, and carpool vans, however, it does not clearly quantify the deficit. The VVMC MP proposed text performs an analysis on the anticipated parking demand using two methods compared to an actual parking demand analysis based upon current knowledge of the parking demand. • Method 1 utilizes the parking generation tables found in the Town Code. This analysis results in an anticipated parking need of approximately 687 spaces. • Method 2 utilizes a needs based approach examining each user group of the various functions of the facility. This analysis results in an anticipated parking need of approximately 645 spaces. • The results of these two methods of analysis were then compared to an analysis of the current parking need which was determined to be 669 spaces. As stated in the VVMC MP proposed text the results of these methods of analysis resulted in a clustering of results from 645 to 687 parking spaces lending a level of reliability to any of the methods resulting in a scenario where anticipated parking will match the need. o In conjunction with the review of the conditional use permit application to establish the development plan for the VVMC the Planning and Environmental Commission will be tasked with determining the appropriate parking requirement for the VVMC cam pus. ■ Within the General Use district the Planning and Environmental Commission will prescribe the parking development standard in conjunction with the review of the criteria for the conditional use permit. Staff believes there is merit to the analysis described in Method 2 and that it can be utilized to perform the parking demand for the site. The Planning and Environmental Commission needs to answer the following question in order to provide final direction on this topic to VVMC: Does the Planning and Environmental Commission agree with the analysis of the actual parking demand for the VVMC site as elaborated in the description of Method 2 as the methodology to be utilized during the review of the conditional use application for the VVMC development plan? Traffic and Circulation Attached to this memorandum is the VVMC MP Traffic Impact Study Executive Summary dated September 30, 2014 (Attachment E). The study suggests that to Town of Vail Page 8 accommodate increased traffic demand and changes in the traffic patterns significant traffic improvements will need to be made to the South Frontage Road. The anticipated traffic impacts to the South Frontage Road coupled with Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) requirements for traffic control will result in the access points for the VVMC, Evergreen Lodge, and Municipal Site becoming right -in and right -out only. A raised median similar to those implemented along the frontage of the Four Seasons will likely be required. As a result of the incorporation of raised medians there will be a need to implement a roadway design which includes a method by which vehicles can return to a east bound direction when leaving the Municipal Site, or desiring to visit the Evergreen Lodge or VVMC sites. Recognizing that the necessary traffic improvements to be implemented would affect multiple sites, representatives from the VVMC, Evergreen Lodge, and Municipal Site have participated in exercises and studies to determine possible solutions. Page 16 of the attached VVMC MP (Attachment A) includes a summary of the process undertaken by the concerned parties and the conclusion that a roundabout is likely traffic improvement to be utilized. A copy of the anticipated option for the roundabout is attached for review (Attachment F). Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed VVMC MP text regarding traffic and has the following comments and questions for consideration by the VVMC and the Planning and Environmental Commission. The Town Engineer has reviewed the submitted Traffic Study and the Executive Summary both dated September 30, 2014. o Ina memorandum dated October 8, 2014, the Town Engineer identified several aspects for confirmation /clarification and discussion. The memo is included as an attachment (Attachment G). As mentioned in the VVMC MP text regarding traffic the Town of Vail Transportation Master Plan will need to be amended to include the solution to address traffic on the South Frontage Road for the VVMC, Evergreen Lodge, and Municipal Site. The Town Engineer has prepared a memorandum commenting on plans provided by the applicant showing access to the VVMC which does not include the use of the southern spur of the proposed roundabout solution. o The Town believes that is imperative to have the VVMC, Evergreen Lodge, and Municipal Site all utilize the spurs off of the proposed roundabout solution in order to achieve compliance with CDOT regulations and local planning efforts to consolidate access points as contained within the Town of Vail Transportation Master Plan. A copy of this memorandum is attached for review (Attachment H). ■ There are challenges in the implementation of a roundabout in conjunction with the unknown redevelopment time frames of the three properties. Town of Vail Page 9 The proposed VVMC MP text regarding traffic shall include statements speaking to the need to utilize the anticipated roundabout traffic improvement south spur for access. The text of the proposed VVMC MP shall be amended to include discussion of the pedestrian circulation and bus transit occurring around the site and the need for circulation through the site. o Include text and imagery in the VVMC MP which depicts and speak to existing pedestrian circulation and future pedestrian circulation and bus stop locations. • Existing conditional along West Meadow Drive. • New condition along south side of South Frontage Road. Need for a north south connection through site with appropriate easements. The Planning and Environmental Commission needs to answer the following question in order to provide final direction on this topic to VVMC-. Does the Planning and Environmental Commission agree with the need for the VVMC site to utilize the possible roundabout improvement to take access to their site during the review of the conditional use application for the VVMC development plan? Bulk, Mass, Architecture Proposed VVMC MP Text Pages 9 and 10 of the attached VVMC MP (Attachment A) includes a summary of the anticipated sequence and expansion plans for the VVMC Campus. The text and associated imagery describe the addition of a approximately 69,000 square feet (not including parking garage). This square footage will be obtained with the addition of a new fourth floor on the west wing and the construction of a new east wing in the location of the original hospital structure. Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed VVMC MP text regarding bulk, mass, and architecture and has the following comments and questions for consideration by the VVMC and the Planning and Environmental Commission. Within the General Use District the Planning and Environmental Commission will determine the appropriate setbacks and height through a review of the conditional use permit application for the development plan. o The neighboring properties' existing and potential development will be considered in making a determination in VVMC development plan setbacks and height. o Surrounding properties applied to them. have a variety of different zoning regulations Town of Vail Page 10 • The Evergreen Lodge is zoned Lionshead Mixed Use 1 requiring 10 foot setbacks and permitted heights with a maximum of 82.5 feet and 71 feet average. • The Skaal Hus, Aplhorn, and Scorpio are zoned High Density Multiple Family requiring 20 foot setbacks and permitted heights of 48 feet for sloping roofs. • The US Bank building has an underlying zoning of Commercial Service Center with Special Development District No. 23 overlay. The underlying zoning requires 20 foot setback and permits a height of 38 feet for sloping roofs. The SDD allowed for an increase in the allowable height. It is unclear from the imagery provided in the VVMC MP document what the anticipated or appropriate setbacks would be. While a master plan is not the location to include specifics on the setbacks, the general 2D massing exhibits appear to have minimal setback from the South Frontage Road and the southeast corner of the site. o The southeast corner is the portion of the site in closest proximity to residential development. This location, more than any other on the site, needs to be thought out to a greater degree at the master plan stage. The proposed VVMC MP text and imager depict a scenario where the majority of the bulk and mass occur on the south portion of the site. o Can bulk and mass be shifter away from West Meadow Drive? ■ Would result in strengthening the pedestrian character of the street. ■ Can /should bulk and mass step down as it approaches West Meadow Drive and adjacent properties? o Can /should there be required articulation in the facades to reduce bulk and mass? The proposed VVMC MP shall include 3D bulk and mass models as were included in previous power point presentations at the public hearings. The Planning and Environmental Commission needs to answer the following question in order to provide final direction on this topic to VVMC: Does the Planning and Environmental Commission agree with the anticipated bulk and mass, its location, and the relationships between neighboring properties? Middle Creek Proposed VVMC MP Text Page 13 of the attached VVMC MP (Attachment A) includes a statement about the portion of Middle Creek which is adjacent to the west end of the site. The text suggests potential improvements should be evaluated for Middle Creek. One example provided is the introduction of practices to improve the run -off water quality. Town of Vail Page 11 Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed VVMC MP text regarding Middle Creek and has the following comments and questions for consideration by the VVMC and the Planning and Environmental Commission This element of the VVMC MP text needs to be enhanced to address multiple aspects. o Staff has included the portion of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan recommendations for the portion of Middle Creek adjacent to the Evergreen Lodge in the Applicable documents section of this memorandum. ■ The description of improvements to Middle Creek in association with the VVMC Campus redevelopment shall mirror the statements contained for that portion of the creek adjacent to the Evergreen Lodge. Gore Creek has recently been listed as an impaired stream by the State of Colorado. Multiple efforts are underway to address the health of Gore Creek and its tributaries. It is imperative that development in town, especially those adjacent to the creek address elements such as: • Run -off water quality. • Sand oil seperators • Gutters and inlets • Snow storage practices and eventual deposition of materials used to both melt and provide traction • Incorporation of riparian vegetation to act as a filter and stream bank stabilization. In addition to steam health, the possibility of Middle Creek becoming an amenity for the VVMC Campus and community should be explored. o Table and benches o Aesthetically pleasing vegetation o Public art The Planning and Environmental Commission needs to answer the following question in order to provide final direction on this topic to VVMC: Does the Planning and Environmental Commission agree with the need to include a text detailing efforts to be undertaken to not only improve the stream health of Middle Creek, but also turn it in to an amenity to the VVMC Campus as a part of the conditional use permit review of the development plan? Employee Housing Page 21 of the attached VVMC MP (Attachment A) speaks to the employee mitigation requirements of the Town Code. Pursuant to Chapter 12 -23, Commercial Linkage, Vail Town Code, only the incremental increase in the number of employees generated by Town of Vail Page 12 the expansion of the facility will be assessed the 20% mitigation rate. VVMC estimates the incremental increase to be approximately 60 employees which would require appropriate mitigation for 12 employees (20 %). The VVMC MP language accurately reflects the process by which "competent evidence" must be provided when a specific land use, hospital in this instance, is listed as having a specific mitigation rate. The VVMC begins to lay the framework for providing all required employee housing off -site, including the 50% required on -site, as may be permitted pursuant to the Commercial Linkage Chapter. Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed VVMC MP text regarding employee housing and has the following comments and questions for consideration by the VVMC and the Planning and Environmental Commission. The VVMC MP text accurately states that there are several processes which would need to occur in conjunction with the conditional use permit review of the development plan with regard to the provision of employee housing. • Hospitals are not included in the Employee Generation Rates table and therefore would need to provide "competent evidence" to establish the correct generation employee generation rate. ■ The Planning and Environmental Commission would evaluate the "competent evidence" in order to determine the employee generation rate. • In order to provide all the required employee housing the Planning and Environmental Commission would need to make a finding as found within Section 12 -23 -6, Methods of Mitigation, Vail Town Code, in order to determine that on -site mitigation is not appropriate. ■ Implementation of the on -site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the intent and purpose of the applicable zone district. Implementation of the on -site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the goals of the applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan and the town's development objectives. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions apply to the site that prevents the implementation of the on- site unit mitigation method. The method of mitigation proposed better achieves the intent and purpose of this chapter and general and specific purposes of this title than the on -site mitigation unit method. The Planning and Environmental Commission needs to answer the following question in order to provide final direction on this topic to VVMC: Does the Planning and Environmental Commission agree with the concept that employee housing on -site may be incompatible with the functions occurring on -site, which would be thoroughly reviewed for compliance with Town of Vail Page 13 the Chapter 12 -23, Commercial Linkage, Vail Town Code, in conjunction with the review of the conditional use permit review of the development plan? Procedural Considerations Pages 21 through 23 highlights of the attached VVMC MP (Attachment A) speaks to the additional tasks that would need to be completed in conjunction with the redevelopment of the VVMC Campus. Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the proposed VVMC MP text regarding future procedural considerations and has the following comments and questions for consideration by the VVMC and the Planning and Environmental Commission Should the VVMC MP be adopted there are multiple additional steps which would need to occur to achieve the implementation of the plan. These items include but may not be limited to: • Amendments to the Town of Vail Transportation Plan ■ Prior to the submittal of a conditional use permit • Amendments to the Town of Vail Lland Use Plan ■ Prior to the submittal of a conditional use permit • Determine the future of Lot 10 through conversation with Vail Town Council ■ Prior to the submittal of a conditional use permit • Minor Subdivision application to dissolve appropriate lot lines • Encompass portion of former Evergreen Lodge parcel • Prior to or in conjunction wit the conditional use permit application • Zone District Boundary application to rezone appropriate parcels to General Use district • Former Evergreen Lodge parcel • Prior to or in conjunction wit the conditional use permit application • Applications to CDOT for South Frontage Road traffic improvements ■ Prior to and in conjunction wit the conditional use permit application The Planning and Environmental Commission needs to answer the following question in order to provide final direction on this topic to VVMC: Does the Planning and Environmental Commission foresee any additional procedural considerations to be addressed? Town of Vail Page 14 III. BACKGROUND The idea for a facilities master plan for the VVMC campus rose out of the municipal site redevelopment project. During discussions regarding the municipal site project, a number of land planning opportunities and facility improvement needs were identified. While the municipal site redevelopment project is no longer being actively pursued by the VVMC and the Town of Vail, the need for certain facility improvements on the VVMC campus remains and opportunities for better land planning still exists. Through previous communications with the Town, VVMC has been given conceptual approval to explore master planning options and ideas which may include the use of certain town owned land. More specifically, that land includes the town's municipal site located at 75 South Frontage Road and 281 West Meadow Drive, library parking lot (Lot 10, Vail Village Filing 2). No final decisions on that matter, however, have been reached. On April 8, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission the applicant presented conceptual ideas for the creation of the master plan and received input from the Commission on the types of issues which needed to be addressed by the Plan. To that end, a significant amount of time and thought has gone into addressing on -site and off - site traffic circulation, determining the parking need, options for addressing the parking need (both on -site and off - site), loading and delivery options, and construction sequencing. Additionally, further investigation has gone into the potential use of the municipal site and /or Lot 10 to help address the physical and spatial needs of the Vail Valley Medical Center. On May 12, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing to address, the planning process, background work that has been completed to date, planning considerations, the format of the master plan document, opportunities for public participation, and a schedule of next steps. In August of 2014, the Vail Town Council and the VVMC decided to exclude the town's municipal site in the VVMC MP as a potential site for parking to meet the requirements of the medical campus. On September 8, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing where an introduction to the proposed VVMC MP was presented. The Commission recommended that the project move forward with a clear agenda of topics to be covered at each hearing. This would allow the public to decide in advanced to attend to participate in those elements of the VVMC MP which most interested them. On September 22, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing where the topic of loading and delivery was presented and discussed. The discussion involved gaining a better understanding of the loading and delivery operations and needs, clarification of the user groups proposed to be relocated to the new "front door". No conclusion on the appropriateness of loading and delivery access remaining off of West Meadow Drive was reached. Town of Vail Page 15 IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS The following planning documents are applicable to the review of this application: ZONING CODE General Use District 12 -9C -1: PURPOSE: The general use district is intended to provide sites for public and quasi - public uses which, because of their special characteristics, cannot be appropriately regulated by the development standards prescribed for other zoning districts, and for which development standards especially prescribed for each particular development proposal or project are necessary to achieve the purposes prescribed in section 12 -1 -2 of this title and to provide for the public welfare. The general use district is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi - public uses permitted in the district are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and, in the case of buildings and other structures, to ensure adequate light, air, open spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of uses. VAIL LAND USE PLAN The Vail Land Use Plan contains multiple goal statements placed into six different categories. Staff believes the following goal statements are applicable to the effort to master plan the VVMC campus. 1. General Growth/ Development 1.1. Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.2. The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. 1.3. The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 6. Community Services 6.1. Services should keep pace with increased growth. Town of Vail Page 16 6.2. The Town of Vail should play a role in future development through balancing growth with services. 6.3. Services should be adjusted to keep pace with the needs of peak periods. The Land Use Plan designates the desired Land Use Category of all properties in the Town. The VVMC is comprised of several properties with differing land use designations. Resort Accommodations and Service (US Bank Building) This area includes activities aimed at accommodating the overnight and short - term visitor to the area. Primary uses include hotels, lodges, service stations, and parking structures (with densities up to 25 dwelling units or 50 accommodation units per buildable acre). Transition (VVMC Campus) The transition designation applies to the area between Lionshead and the Vail Village. The activities and site design of this area is aimed at encouraging pedestrian flow through the area and strengthening the connection between the two commercial cores. Appropriate activities include hotels, lodging and other tourist oriented residential units, ancillary retail and restaurant uses, museums, areas of public art, nature exhibits, gardens, pedestrian plazas, and other types of civic and culturally oriented uses, and the adjacent properties to the north. This designation would include the right -of -way of West Meadow Drive and the adjacent properties to the north. LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMNT MASTER PLAN The following is the language contained within the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan regarding the Middle Creek Stream Tract adjacent to the Evergreen Lodge development site. 5.19.4 Impacts on Middle Creek Stream Tract The Middle Creek Stream Tract lies to the west of the Evergreen Lodge. The Tract is owned by the Town of Vail. The tract is heavily vegetated with several substantial deciduous trees and a significant lower layer of underbrush. Although the site borders the Middle Creek Stream Tract, there is no significant amount of quality vegetation on the site, and the parcel lies out of the 100 -year flood plain. As currently configured, opportunities exist to better recognize the benefits of creekside development. While the natural riparian corridor of Middle Creek needs to remain protected and preserved, the physical and visual relationships and references between adjacent development and the stream tract should be strengthened. An opportunity exists to create a significant connection between the Evergreen Lodge and Middle Creek. Any use of Middle Creek for aesthetic or recreational purposes, however, should be subordinate to the preservation of the natural riparian corridor and its inherent natural character. The Middle Creek Stream Tract may provide an opportunity for the construction of a recreational path connecting the South Frontage Road to the existing pedestrian paths at the Dobson Ice Arena. Town of Vail Page 17 V. NEXT STEPS At the hearing on October 27th will cover any reaming topics not completely addressed in previous hearing and will include the helipad topic for discussion. Are there any additional materials the Commission anticipates at this time in order evaluate future discussion items encompassed by the WMC MP? The Planning and Environmental Commission is asked to table this public hearing to the October 27, 2014. VI. ATTACHMENTS A. Proposed WMC MP dated August 2014 B. Turn Key Consulting memorandum addressing Delivery and Service Vehicles on West Meadow Drive dated September 30, 2014. C. Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan Addendum for West Meadow Drive D. VVMC parking Anlaysis dated October 9, 2014 E. WMC Traffic Impact Study Executive Summary and Full Report F. Anticipated South Frontage Road roundabout. G. Memorandum from the Town Engineer dated October 8, 2014 H. Memorandum from the Town Engineer dated September 26, 2014 I. Correspondence from neighbors Town of Vail Page 18 N V C� V �Kgz owl �r -4do H �� U) a U 10 z a w w w a O U a w N PLO O z w w a w z 0 N N z w z 0 U w w a c� 75 U' u Q � � H 0 Q) 75 0 V u .R rl V °'off �xU � �I on HO��H s—. V U a� I `I 7. I Z; W W x w i i O N ors 0 Q) 75 C7 U Q) Q 75 U u o 0 0 75 F-� 0 x 0 Q) 75 0 V u .R rl V °'off �xU � �I on HO��H s—. V U a� I `I 7. I Z; W W x w i i O N ors O N U Q O N r-1 E c 0 O oO o +' �; 0 4 U U L a o N (6 7 4- C N (6 L `� U t U O� 0 m C: U W c t a E a c o +, °' ro c +, o c= o E> o°'io c E t � 0 3 a; r� o � r� � oA r� °' O ±' 0-0 c m N O c c 4a CL -P C m L a-•' t O 0 �•' f v U r6 O C L D a-+ � O U L C � L +- L- `� O N O> 4- U U L a O Ln C� t U (6 L 0 4- C U U ° (6 a p Ln a>U m l 0� o C -' -+ U t > m a2 � � to aci '� fa o ~ > - o � U •- '> oA O U fa > _ U L O (6 -0 6- 0 U L � N N .- � ,U > `� +' � - t CL L Q Q C C 0 i6 � = •E i6 C •� ?� 4- a fa E N •> '� 0 •L U •> C +� ro U O (n L E w O C: -.P D LP ° .- C' O H ro ro Q ro ra - Q Ln E _ a� > c fa o> o c a W a o a� " 4- U r� 2> O O O� -P x O o X ai ro > vi ro L C E c o tn E w� o U 3 r� C r� = O 0 '7 " o t O �, O= o 'r� c x U U. c 3 �t 3 ram >�> U�-0 a 4 4- U N M 4- C 0 > a (C6 to (6 L m (6 0 > U 7 N 0 C L Q a) N �� N O O-0 m C O M f C r6 U Ln E ro C C U a; t c t a 2 �, 4- fa 0 U (6 C: .- +- Q O O - vI M L L VI > 4- •(6 U a-+ •p V hA 0 4- C .0 -0 U a.., fa Ln CL V 4 c: 0 •m t L (6 L V VI (6 •x > Ln L fa N N i O— U N E In N L p 0 Ln N N v U� O O O 0 E U N � E C� 0 Q E L O O O U (6 N : *' (6 C L vi 0 7 (C6 U> U U C U E o U U hA vUi U 7 C D m U (�6 C U O r6 U .0 L 0 t +�+ O CL -0 ate+ OA -> U (6 U U U H 0 4- O +- L. � .� 0 (6 Ln u U L t E (6 � O O E O C a c c f p U E 0 4--•' C p U O U +' t L U 'n 'n (L6 E` C L •V 7 Q cn t t N U o O t a E U 7 ua 7 rn rm rS �v G P. 1) M C. a� 'C y � 0 F.a Ql a v a i v a v t O v G v v v 0 v O O v O O •V w A i l� N bJJ 0 N U Q O I� r-q I t� N p qA N U .� C > > O C > > (6 N N> N a-+ N N U Q ate'' Q ate+ O E O u ��' o X L 0 > (6 ++ $ O `n (6 C � O U t C C> C C qA (6 Q (6 > VI VI _ 'VI O L a� O t `n Q a N L C .E L X O L C CiA fa (6 0 a-+ E O N (6 t -0 4- (6 u O 0 ate+ N L C N (6 a- m a-+ a•+ O C N R O L (6 (6 4- > M *' O Q) > N Q > .0 N +' O U p O — +' 0 O � L � +' � L C p> H Of � N C N � n U N vii O C N VI N VI 16 L O O O O-0 w� fu O O - +� L t OL � L- Q -r t O (6 2� _� •� E O N C ++ N 0>± U N a-+ L M 4- � C � N O U C O U N Q N .0 C hA O N C O O +� p _ (6 C ��t r� —0 =) r� . p 0��� > o °' > C) O a� N C L . > a�i T >� E L C L N a-+ r j •Q � N� N r6 O O ro O C N O N r6 N 4 ro N N E E N p O C '� C C C N N cn >' O S- VI O N L C C N C O hA C C U L> N x C � p � 7 a— L (6 VI (6 = a : (6 _ •O N C O w (6 to io 4- L ._ > L O— p (6 L a-+ a-+ t (6 L C to ate+ O w X N `� O — Ln N> Q O . "� 0 m U p a..j L (6 c �— O u (6 O L 4- '� L w (6 c C O V 4-' D C m c C m N •� N N> 7> p 0 in C p O t O N O Q ate+ X N-r m L t C 0 a-+ N 7 w w VI W C ++ W H W U m m OC CL 4a t� N U Q z 0 U I� M O +' C °' — L U 0 L o °D C c M u � a) 0 te0 O O 4- + O O 4- a � a+ .- O C Q Q fa U C � U C M E E W- H O ( L Q O� ) O � U O i - r a) _ .� Q N • > .p fa > ra t, fa O v O O ' > ° c o o � Y C W > o � a U O ra U o C � .L CL CL � C L 7 ate+ M (6 0 (n � O 0 a) 0> E a) LA W_ 4- M fa VI '� a-+ > C N L C a) Q N Q M M C: v L O t U (6 v r6 :^ Q OU U F O > hA LL o Q~ U .� Q �' L a C �' > oA C o fa p L (6 a) C fa 4 � +� a) > vOi 0 O U Q > 0 O Q p C Z_ U O a) B O O E N ?� t Q 0 : E z t O U r6 Z qA > 4- > ro fa L +, O O ai i -0 (6 > C C O O a) W a) t a) a� t� �t C a) �_ L U ro 7 +' a) a) O a) +' +' M 41 p 'OA '(6 t� fa O C +� U O a) ±' > C a) L N +� Q C C t J (6 ++ > C Q a) a) C U L U Q Q in O L) a) -r- > fa U W L O a) Q-P fa O 1 'O •L pp •� +� Q fa '� 7 U C c7 to W o � fa � � � a t E 4 � O 3 � � = ate) ax) a) " � � � � o Z U L C C � E> O U Q U> U C a-+ fa X> a) O > Q fa t 0 0 0 ti w A 0 N 41 C VI C a) in N � _0 06 fa U C N VI (L6 OA a) 41 ro 3 a) > fa O i Q VI L C ++ Q (n N _ (6 _� C O > > C ate+ `� a-+ (6 a-+ O x a) — C C: U O U t a-+ O O X O •L a) -0 > L a) O O a) (_0L6 a) — a oC C dA a) C E U >> C N +� C a) O> U O O= O N LO + W �j V) U _ Q Q fu O Q> U L L U U C Cr 4- C M L 4O � � m +' fa > U— •a) O in Q C 0 E OU a a) > C a) 0 t Y ' O ~ Q N a) L �-.� � L (6 VI C >> +� a) U C +� (6 +� L U d C _ '(6 U w a) O C fa m >` Q (6 O Q a) 'ho Fo a i +' > O U O (6 (6 N — C a) C c C Q >' (L6 (6 in •U ,� O 4- a) L L C O O 4- '(6 E OL hA M a) +' : C (6 A C +' O ++ U a) +� C o O a) 7 t >' o N a) O CL rn o U a) t o °' U 0 Q a) '� .� " o D t +, — oA E m °� °� U *' °c1D E D ra D � —' ro o a) Q t a) *' M U a) ro C +, (6 C— O L O OC Q a) 7 O +' 4- C N C r6 Q N (6 4- ' U t U U a +�+ w U t o O 0 ro t O 4- ra U C Q a) C U C O U >,> 'C LL (6 U (n VI (6 a� •L C — (6 r-I 00 O a-' c-I fa a) L 4a Ln O C •� 0 O hA O a-+ ate' I\ I\ 'hA Ol C fa O Q -0 4- a-' O N fa Z ate+ ate+ LO � N N CY) � a) ON N : qA O a) r6 0 a 0— o C hA t C *O C O t N 'in C— a) O + Q (6 in — fa O E C Q Q H Q t U U M U L w J Q a) > C a--+ 'D 0 W> QU W E 00 w (6 a) ro H O • • • • • ti w A 0 N U W z 0 Q z U m _0 C: (1) 0 0 -0 (1) �C: 41 U M 4-1 1 E _0 (6 (6 Q VI C N m C 0 � OC t i •C O O E �, C 4te1 hA -0 m (6 �' J N N +' (6 o a-' o U m 0 +� ++ C m O L C .1 O N D 4- J C N oil Of D-C u o N O Q (� > — N t L Z � =) > V CL 0 m FS C r6 +' (6 0 O '� v (6 > +' N O 0A L N L N-0 O N D U r6 C C N L 4a �_ 4a E N a+ N N O O ' N Z .� N> 4- i6 > (6 _ 0 - ; m N to in N '� t o 4- Q 2 (6 VI C D tn 'L O D O O (6 (6 O O O O C: (6 -0 Q O O C N L •L > O 0 U u N O in 0 'O N C {L ~ O t 42 7 L U U CD OC +' O + , VI m v, O 'Q > C to 0 0 — i 0 N 4- (6 (6 ? L > Q O Ln (1) > p O a) N W N O (6 O .� > N L (6 U C O C O ++ N t N Q N 'L Q O (6 O (6 >� OL OL u 44-+ ,in .> u � 4- J C N Q LL O N (6 U —0 O U- L 0 0 (6 L - 0 C 0> vI > > O C Ln 4- N •> ; a-+ U (6 O .P•. N : 4 L _ in I , VI Q +� L L U (6 - O 0 '> hA +- O > 0 7 o > N Q +' C: _0 C m D 0 U N > > L C O Ln ,C Y C: to U •L C C C VII N N o L .0 3> N C O t U Q N VI U 00 C a) 0,0 � O a� C u (6 4- L (6 N N C c Of � C .� 0 4- 0 �= N O Q 00 p O L (6 O C U t 7 (6 O �� C �� 0 N Q � �— O E m (6 N-o O a C L- .2 >j U - O U > N M 4O 4O U Of Q Q OU N 0 (1) 0 -0 (1) �C: 41 U M 4-1 E _0 VI - (6 -0 C (6 m C N N E 0 � OC C O O �, - o -0 O > (6 O J N N +' in N 0 +� ++ C VI ++ � � N U C C 0 L D-C 4- O (� > N L L Z � =) > V CL 0 m FS C D C _0 Z :) O N W (6 > N N N % C N L -0 t •L (6 U U r6 C r6 Q L 4a �_ 4a E > a L (6 N O Z C L O _0 i6 > 4-j _ N ate,, m N N in N '� U Z 4a 2 (6 o o C O 4- co P: o c w t C: O Z +� C (6 C E VI 0 U u N O in 0 fa N C {L ~ to O 0 t 4- 7 > U U CD LA U in 'O 4_j =) m v, C 'Q > N Z > 0 0 ++ L E0A Ln O N� C O W O U J G a c 0 N a a c k N w i i 0 N bJJ U W O z O m �' 1l ,p�yy ^, {( �P Z ' ■ Q�arr r 0 .► -,� . _ Z � • ES � LU u At LIJ ■ EL Y rr- ♦ + v ♦ > > ■ R rr- ,. r�> >� c —' w °e' 1 ■ Q Q w ° ♦ I-- w m, D U Z uj r j LL Z Q co 0 N bJJ Ul 1--1 rO �-I wl Q z W U O r� V z z �l 1--1 W N N w I O N bJJ U C: a (p O E a- �+ C L •?�. (6 N Q OL hA O 4- (6 (6 C t C 1 C 4.1 (6 ro E C O OA C N 7 L N > D 07 } L L V U m O Q N N O 0 N > L ++ (p C C U a� C _ d 0 0 n •> (6 (6 L D O Q U •Q VI fu fu }i Q 0 X ,� U N E O C p N U t .� C N o Q O � Q 4 N U> N "= vI O U N O O N N N qA +' O a Q c O Q L IL Zn Q •� U O L fu Q N O E I O C N (n Q N N w I O N bJJ •(6 1 LO L •?�. (6 hA 2 (6 Q , � (6 t 1 C 4.1 (6 C L.L C O OA C -0 L : > C L 4- 0 4 L ++ +� U .0 0 n •> •� L Q U •Q VI fu fu Q O ,� U L .� In C G Zn •� U L > Q N O L ++ O C t Q •O O 0 O p L +O, U 0 O� m N N N (6 .O (L6 a Q> O0 M� *� ate+ ; > N (6 E 0 .- C v = +� •� .- 'n Q 4- (6 O C � 4- (6 pp O o N dA (6 X� O •O 7 � Q C: •D N 0 > N O O *' C •O VI 0 (6 N •c: N> 4- C fa .� Q ++ C a-' p N �n dA > a-+ O dA -j t (6 N .� Q u � O O CL O m N .Ln L VI VI O C (6 C ate-+ Q U •U i i N N OA C_0 C 4L- ?� � U > C (p ++ C Q N VI U C (6 (6 >(n (6 N O N O -0 N E N U p N •� O (6 U m N VI VI L 1 N U u- _ (6 ++ m •U O N C a-+ D L •L i O L ++ N = (6 U L N (6 N > VI X C O ++ 0 -r- ++ (6 +N� +� VI N N Q dA C E C C VI N +- Q O C E (6 t C VI C O� ++ 0 in 0 C 7 N w> O to > O N (6 p N 0 N VI L O U 0 O L v O Q- Q C o t D D O Q O 0� C: M (D t 4- " Q 0 `� U +O+ D 4- N p E E +� 0 U C m L L Q +' (6 (6 L O ,n U > p N N L' � (6 U O U L O +O, L O� N Q +� O +, O 0 Q N 7 U N N Z J N Q L w N � u O 0 N u ru O E N Q v E O U N U 7 *� N +� m N t C O aw C t C N- +� u L -0 C r6 C -0 p in +1 U� +' m O C t n C �D m :C 41 O Q O O N C L —.- : +�, N N Q� C hA Q Q O O> U Q O C Q 7 C L O 42 N p M 41 � L N� O C Q 7 Q 0> N C U N +� > O N U .0 � N N O W L E E c > O O N N O N 0 L E O O a 2 O m O p N C ._ Q O C! v :� m ro N m w N > 4 L U U Q -0 N 41 C (6 4— ++ 7 aa) .E N N w I O N bJJ Ul 1--1 rO �l 1--1 W z W U O 11 z z a w L a� O _0 il p +1 c c N U fu fu 0 41 hA � 4- hA fu > C � � � ++ C C C L- U N .N '> L C L L C L L- 0 o O o N •L ate+ p (6 ao+ (6 N O 4- a-+ LL (6 U (6 N o to 4- O C LA to Q o 4- (C6 4- u > N Q a..' OA .0 O ate+ (6 o L L Q (6 0 (6 O- o C to `� Q C O o O> c0 w Q O N- N - ° c ° c � L D a a `� N U ro O r6 E O O O O O p L L _ C +� to to N +� p Q U ro p -P Q t � O 0 ro o qA C Ln o `� to O > O C' o `� ro L- O N In E U c ° to E o� U a� - E > D-0 � o Q O Ln a� C -C C C L qA Q i6 Q V V L a.., C > _ 4a L U (6 C U O X C U Q U o o U > O (6 = X 7 C C (u (u U In (6 'L to o to C a-+ L N a-+ o Q t o ++ ?� o Q O +- C N o (6 C U> +� : - o E to O _0 (L6 0 Q •L O E � -r (,J 0 ate-+ •� (6 (L6 Q (6 L O 'L � o pC N p (6 (6 hA Q (6 Q O to ao+ oA O Q C m > o C 4- Q to o C m in O Ln N to fu fu j o 0 o,o a; v N 4; 0 U ro a) L U 4, to t .L E �' Q C O Q to .> .O C hA +�•, _ O O N p= N O •� O Q O > 0> fu ate-+ a•+ >, ++ U- o C \ N to >, O O w O U U W L-o L p O ao+ o Q p O E= hA to +, `� (6 O p +' (6 Q '> Q O (6 O O +, - O M C 'L 4- Q c w a� o° a� o o p° .� E Q �' c U o° M o oOfCf cctn� a >— r�QsoU =Q U a p c _C C +- L L, U to N o (6 o O W a • • • • • • • • • • .� U Q O (6 (6 p C Q C w p .L r� E E o Cu M O � o,o � c o m U U C U a•+ C: to H C t N om-+ D o > c O c to 4-- W" 4- a; L ate-+ C 0 0 0,0 •L L `� O 7 to E O a-+ o (6 C C o O> In C o +a N a� p qA > i r6 a� C p Q hA 4- > t N L, E o w �, �, °� pip C c c > o fu qA Q� L C +� C U (6 — C C N .� °U N X Q (6 C (6 to •L +�+ O to `� (6 j O o hA t Q O m O N (6 +' E C 4- - > a•' - to V (6 N L >j O L L .� C >� O w o C Q (6 _0 m to c p p Q W p �, p P o,o w c m z 3 w C +' c c r� o,o o� a� Q o • • �, oA r� c o +' c to c p c to .p C ro qA qA Q m O ro C .^t C > C > U > (6 0 p L C C L X o \ to O C C L C m L fu 0 N Q to (6 C (6 N (L6 m (6 fu hpA U LA ate•+ 0°A O N W U C W N C O qA N O +O O 0 0 QO to O C .0 L O � o N .- _ C m C +' L > O >j a O �' U toil to t � U -_0 C N N U J Q O O D U O w U c U U C +� (6 (6 C p to .� a w 3 w o to .� m o LL ° ° ° LL to M ° 4- W es„ w p E O Q Y u O +' U Q .� o m N .- ri N m N w A i 0 N bJJ Z �4 / � / ¥ 1-4 � � w e Z ¥ � Q / ¥ Z Z w U / � O / / / ¥ 1-4 � � w e Z ¥ ► � E 2 / � 2 2 �ƒ D .q � q � E § �/ ° w 4 § % k ƒ U 4 / > / 3 G¥ / a G a ¥ q q d \ E CL 'f 7 .§ fu u E ± W 'C E § �2 q � ƒ U > 4- 0 » au) 3 1 E In r o._ E 3 2 2 -r2f2 % M § C: \ m � m E E E !- R / / fa / > ƒ . E u w 2 fa 0 \ \ fa Ln 2 E § ° 4- m R t=Q, o / E .� 2 k- Q § § -0 / > § 2 k � -a E ° 2 .- § \ » \ f � ƒ0 � % E ® E r C 2 • > � $ G 3 k.1 O / O cm G 3 _r_ 4A E § \/ k ° / 4 § � § � f 0 a E 2 % 4- � o > q § $ 2 § 3 § k $ / U / ba °U� R ° 4 o N/ 2 o .� r E° o� § a 0 0 °�° - fa fa §: 5 fa 2 �.� E m E§ u o o� (1) § E � \ 4.1 \� 2 f § f E (§§ /ƒ Q- E k k f@ E E E G Q K ° r b >/° r a 3 g f 5@ 7 2ƒ § o u E u m'� r � o U 6 o 7 E -� E D k o+ 2 / / § $ CL £ ƒ •- E / > .E ± ° •� m :.\ a) ? E •- E E \ 6 E � f 0 @ % ƒ § ° z O <» E 2 2 2 at E c � E N:2 2 3 G¥ / a G a ¥ q q d \ E CL 'f 7 .§ fu u E ± W 'C E § �2 q � ƒ U > 4- 0 » au) 3 1 E In r o._ E 3 2 2 -r2f2 % M § C: \ m � m E E E !- R / / fa / > ƒ . E u w 2 fa 0 \ \ fa Ln 2 E § ° 4- m R t=Q, o / E .� 2 k- Q § § -0 / > § 2 k � -a E ° 2 .- § \ » \ f O W Q O U C7 W Q z z z O 1--1 X w O W W qD � v c O ?� E Q -0 CL O L p 4- Q + ate+ '- t M (6 a) hD CL 0 m O 0 p C vi Q dA E 0 rn 0 L m O 0 0 � m c: � u _ fa u OL 0 U w U w Q E O Q E U w O W W E C D) `- u O L O C m Q to ro w t • � qA c - c > *' u X L N O � •� ro U N o Q W p ate+ +� � •io D) d O }i c O O N m E O �..i Z- •O a+ E a+ L C ' L t a E E O OL (6 3 ; D) a-+ C C(6 G LU � � (f6 LL (6 D) (6 > to O O m •Q (6 '� dA D) L a+ O C t O O a •E t 4 O D) t p U 0 hA in O Q O t + +' D) O +' `n L OU D) O N D) t u Q O +' p > U a to W D) N a 0 W-r C a c E X m c OU N O > 4- +' O � c 4J Nq-_ D W XX N vOi D O t N > O L O Q C p C 0 E t C to U a) - -0 D) C +1 E O D) ate-+ O Q LO (L6 0 L 2i 41 CL w E a-+ O U to i N 0> O 0 U Q 3 .2 O U fu `� 4- c O u O O t u O a-•� c O X O a� '0 0 C (L6 U > Q C 4- OD C O D E qD L Q C C � D) in > a) � p 'tn 2 M � N C 7 O p ro m, O C E c O +� C o tiA C c E> hA 0 % a) w U� O 4- O U 4- L L 4- D) fCC D C fa Q (6 C >j �-• (L6 a-+ C VOI m Q C w t •� C Q X D) E O O t D) +m+ qD � v c O ?� O E > u o dA c 0 -0 E L m O X O O C O � _ fa u OL 0 4- w Q E .� E O W O W W � fa `- u O L O +w+ � L O u (6 O E hD to - OA L 4- > to O � to (6 U O N m E O W >� to C C O C D) (6 C C ' L t a'' O OL (6 p � � � (f6 LL (6 D) (6 > to U (6 D) W 0 a-+ a+ •L L O O t D) D) a-+ D) (6 a-+ L O r6 Q r6 Of +' > +' +' `n C t � O N D) t hA C O +' m O > U a to W D) ,� a 0 C C c: hD C _0 .L LD U t (6 ?� m p0 •6 ate-+ O LO 0 c 4- c CL w E a-+ O U O Q �� Q L W O U� +' U c O hD u Q O t u to 0 fu C O 0 C (L6 M Q C 4- C O O 4- qD - N hA 7 .L > C .� D) C O O N m, O C C O E +� C D) tiA C 0 to t 4 U , 0 '� a) w M ) U (6 a-+ > t O .c �� W E co u U •° w O Di w (6 `1 O L O C U W" w� -0 O U t t O OC p qA Q Q Q D) C U' O-0 w fa Q C fa 4- M +- 4- OU w E_*-r_� to O > D) • • • • p 1 O m t 0 4.1 O -r -0 w C a� `� O O ~ c to ' b O aa) � a, o c c = : r5 a� U a� O D) L to D) L O >j Q 2 N —�' 7 a-+ OA to O D) U U ++ p ++ p > O OL C 0 C C v O 0 L p VI L p � W hC1D _ Q C .- 0= 0 0� 'O Q i C D) c Y> U L U Q — O D) > Q O to C C C (6 N — 0 OL O O 7 O > t 0 O C fa t ro .0 oD O O pD E fa C D) = OU O Q (a C dA C~ 0 C C C= to O O - O C O >� C fa fa hA O O Q C i D) fa fa D) O �_ O U D) L j rl •p �' X O O 0 0- C N D U (6 O C O of O W +� C� O O L D) VI fa 0 , fa c c V) C14 t O + Q c: c: ro W hA O N O 4- b.0 X L (C6 fa c Q N C O O `� CL 0 C OL D) O iF C — Cl- to a� c o x a� N O w m E to �, Q W =_ ra +�+ O C O Q Q (L6 >` N i J fa OL to •>, •� t (�6 O i a c aci 'n w o+ c— E a� a� + t N x cC C >. 'X -0 m to O w N L N ++ ro > c C\ O C 41 N N L p M W C O O L -r- 41 OL a� 7 OA a� U •(6 ++ O N *' Q O to >j cl C L 'C : O +' O dA W 7 Q - C 0 � uw a�i a ra w 'o M 0 U U t c c c fa U— o m i U 0 7 �+ UO .� Q hA D) (6 W fa O (6 — toil Q C +1 � hA � 7 to W L C t O • • • W 5 0 U Q m > t% M 41 U U Z � � t Q fa 0 Of Oh - (1) N w i i 0 N bJJ vJ O W O U z r ^W z z z O 1--1 X w w O w W • v V N y N1 � �p �V O in > +1 C to i C � ?�. (6 N N Q 4 to to Q N E Q> (6 U N to O (6 hA ,C C z Vf L r Z x- p-0 L C N M Q 41 p � D L w �'� > N p p C �+ O-0 U• r I Z J l7 W _� �; U fC i (L6 O> (6 C (6 u O C t vI a z z z z �y Y f K p u� O a C > a� ! c � � i i D f N irr v V N y N1 � �p �V O in > +1 C to C � ?�. (6 N Q 4 to to Q N E Q> (6 U N to O (6 hA ,C C L Vf L p x- p-0 L C N M Q 41 p O D L N 4O CO •� > N p p C �+ O-0 _� �; U fC i (L6 O> (6 C (6 u O C t vI C t+ p O C t C > a� Om o C o U rL N O to 'Fu a� — CL C: C C n a a� u CC: co ru O p w w C o _ •r .� — U .CL L a (6 t O C O C C 7 L N 7 O Q .2 0 O ++ N >> U t C N +� C L (6 W O N OA > O to p C t +, O L U O fC C: pA C ++ (6 C t Q to M in 1 ++ U O O C N C in > C C � U N hC1D b�0 C t C O ? ro L — > + N (6 p D U 0 C L O� U +� C N U to m p (6 C E i N Vj D � +, a� � m C p O — O N p L m N O m C N i O U �+ OU L O E Q i Q C— in C in (p N C .OA .0 in '� L QVI C 0 •— U p �..i > t C E � VI N {n m C U (6 O '0 N U N ++ p C C U> •� � p 41 an N (6 D C M m p C C p m C O Q N m CL D cyv .� N (6 p dA p } 41 C p p _ L C — p 6l ._ U C '— Q (6 C 7 +�+ O U Q j m O t 0) N t • — D C: t hA � 00 D N w w C N O C cn H +O 00 Q .� I IM u O U O i t N t O A v H N � U N v � O O � O G v � t� N bJJ W Q z U /^W l--I z 1--1 X W w W W (1) +, r� 'L N CL O CL C Q (6 (6 to qA 41 � � N a N (6 U41 N O hA qA Q C O U (6 X L a) C fu >�� U +�+ C ++ C (6 N O (6 L- (1) n • • 41 txG N C O (6 > u U (6 C (6 a-+ (6 N U O 4- O •L O U t N U C (6 t C N N •L Q 0 Q Q (6 N N t U O Q N N N t C Q N 0 7 cr N D qA C •L O O O a� ro U fu qA � C (u Q C (6 ate+ VI N � O O C C O 0 U ° w O 7 L L O a O N t o a cn t + r6 CiL 0 ro N O X 4- 0 L (1) 4-•i i J L f f t C _ in O D O } C L Q I ° aM � E 0 O 4 — w C C u • x; N in U C '�° O 0 N O U C _0 U 7 > L C 4- 0 CL 4- O N C 7 O '� 'L Q C C Q N O X M U O Q U N -0 N O C O Y 4- (6 L CL U V fa I 0 -rL r 'C — C fa 4- > t > (6 N •� .L 0 .L O -0 O •C U Ctf Q P 4- lb 2 ° L ro fa O > O dA O N JO 4- � in N N O N p� C C> L C G C C O LL m U .O , U O Q N N N t C Q N 0 7 cr N D qA C •L O O O a� ro U fu qA � C (u Q C (6 ate+ VI N � O O C C O 0 U ° w O 0 N bJJ a o a t i J f f N I I 1 p r I u • x; 8 C V; V I v v to ap ' > Kn ti i-.4 lb JO 0 71 ci 0 N bJJ O /W I--I Un V j ^W I� z z z 1--1 X W w w F.- L p U t a) O a) ,±- U O oA O 1 t vi O t fa in a) +, 0 w vi U ro w +' C U p O O ���� a) C °' °�� Cw� 5 o� U��oc +, 3 a) O a) a) > C c o o a o `� Co o°',0 0 OVA '� VI C a) a' O i O O a) -0 �E > (6 4- VI \ t a-+ U > +' E a) qA L a) L a) O > 0 a O a) W O� a C ��° O O > O C fa ro O > a) >, L a) a) L E hA (6 a) N a) O t ON a) 4- � ,> � L.L U �+ a 0 a) C VI U \ � C a) ° a) (6 ° -0 , •- o fa a a ° o M (U6 a) a) fu C (6 a) r6 U ++ +' o +' > C a) o k n o t a) I ±' +' ° o O Y C U p C a) cn C U hA O U 0 .� C a) w m m p in �� L VI C Q hA L U >j a) � L) Y E 4 (6 C `� a) -0 C a) •� .0 a) +' ra a) L U a) M M fu o o ° hA C o N p °) + a) hA > 4+ E_ U a VI VI t L O O C fa O > a) +� p VO p U (U6 fa C: tn a-+ C ate+ O Q fa ate+ fa (6 qA _ L C-F (6 C m N a) � 'L L (6 '? U a) U U a) `� C N C O> (6 a N a U N -Q to OU ° oOC ° ° —° v N a oOc O a-+ a) C C C O L L u *' C t a) C 4- U a) O a) -0 t m a t C N vi a U a) qA 4- L C ate-+ •� 0 4a a) ±' w > L •� a w O a) Y Q a) w 4-j •� }�i VI ° •L L I L C (6 0 V) O 0 C 40J E O c o a) ro °' a) hA ro O U `� ro w L �_ o C 3-0 C: M p Q N U t W C E N- C L fa U 4- t fa a i O E L ro 000 p n= 0 p ro p -0" E o a) `� ° O O C: °�' 3 m a) c a) a) a — � L a) C o -C a) C L ate+ 0 - O 0 C � � O ate+ ate+ w E � �O > ++ ate+ C VI (6 ° hA C 'n fa - N > O U a-+ L 3 t O= aj m E '7 > L C ro a) 3 C- 3 o a 'c > +, ° 4, o o,o o `� � a) m a) L — .� +, +� p x C Y L a hA to C — 7 � � Q t a) N E c >: a) L a) L p a) + U N (6 H a) C •� O t >� a) t hA •L +- O U t +' C U '� 4-j E a C a) 60 _ E — a) a — _ �n x t a) D o E r� U ro hA hA L N +O' C � +' hA N 4- 0 a) hA E U ate+ a C)A C '� C — O .� •� ro •� C >� C ro C u ro C 7 U a) L 4-. 0 C > C 4 a) D = U a) 0 > ro a) ro d ro C - M CL L t O 4- p O_0 a) a) O O t ro `� C �n D a) a) a) X ro Q a o U 3 '� r� C t 3 +� +- � o 2 O t U r� t oA a) U N w A 0 N bJJ G z 0 w Q z 0 U z c� W Q Q z z O x W w W W w A N bJJ E � ro � O C i` O N +' '� L L +� O io ++ +' E N a-+ p 0 L +' fu m N Q 4a _ O •O Q 'L N •� %` Q E L 45 0 4-j (6 — 4-j qA -r- O v C 4- +' 4-+ N (6 1 N +- (6 0 a-+ 4- N U N (n 0 D -0 0 U qA t L Q +� {n C o w C u O O N E O `e CL 0 ±+ N w> in U N L p a• +, N in 4-r - (6 N L C W O cr 4a C N C C -0 —_ O U O a-+ O U C- (6 ate+ OL p m C ?! N -r-+ +' O VI t 4-j fa 0 4r L N L= C N C VI O C L 1 O C N .Fn f CN > C L a) c))- O E U Q" L 4a L— °.� 2 NO,E C: D C a C> 4- Q O E L N �j O (6 >O N > N �O •> C hA 4- a+ L (C6 D in O N C in (U6 N 4- t O '� C ++ O VI N Q' (6 C (6 n 0 U D 0 C N N OC Ln t (6 O m OA (6 U 0 N N O Q E N X fa L -0 4- " U L Q '�-+ 72 ate-+ 0 1 W U O N (L6 LO _ 7 U +� C N VI O U L 0 C +, w 0 C X O N 4- � N •L C m Q N O O U v� U 0 p (6 > .0 L O v M ate+ a L LL > 7 M O ,n N t 0 7 N� X O O � i Q'L Q -o Ln E =_ O L C C ate+ 7 N E m C to N} N C O ro +� Ou Q § Q Q N V) U 'L 4- a O w A N bJJ U w w a h N w A t� O N bJJ a� _0 o C: C , _0 O N D (n a+ m '� L '� Q ±+ 0 Q t " - C 0 0 j -6 C > N C 0 D U U E — 0 U (6 x t p -Cc: > > 4- > O N p (6 to E 4- o t Q L Q 0 Q U D 0 U 0 •� 0 (L6 4-j a-+ U .� (6 U a•+ 0 (6 E U L CL C U ) - (6 0 Q i U 0 N 0 t _ C 0 (6 0 > N 7 N C D N - U -0 -0 C to U (6 U t D Q > C O E (L6 (6 0 � dA > O (�6 L N p 4a w a •� L 0 U L C C � E N (o LU > C 4 N 4a L O '^ +' D O N ate+ C: 0 to 0 i N 0 (n O O `n (� (6 7 U to N t p+ (6 — (6 C (6 0 ro fa +� U 0 O N D 0 p 0 a) (6 ate+ > fa t m � -P 0 0 Ln +' N cn � U ro p L Q (o Q C: U a-+ ate+ L E (L6 > C p OA (6 U (6 m to N 0 u O U N� N —> D � —� CL U> 4_ Ln >j j E t O -0 to N C 0 Q— o fa — N LLI N L-� (o .P x O 67 U U (6 �.. H aL+ � Q E N U qA � LL LL (L6 " J J a.., C D U : 7 C +�+ Q hA N N (6 to 0 (6 H < U- a a_ d Q Q> to U N N w A t� O N bJJ a� o C O N D (n a+ '� L '� Q _ t U to - C 0 j hA C U E 0 0 > N U U 1 L 2!- • O N N (6 t L Q 0 >O E U 0 •� a-+ 4a .� (6 U n 0 (6 E (6 L CL C U (6 0 'L i U 0 N _ C 0 (6 0 > 7 U 7 N C D C \ ate+ o� U t D C N O qA > t 4 a+ VI C N ) N (o LU > N L C > to >2 > O0A 0 LL L v hA O `n i -C 4- U N t N N— ro m +� U 0 O O D •� O U N > � O m � C L0 0 Ln � LL U > ate- p L Q C C N O to � > (6 (6 (6 w (6 U (6 m to N 0 u O U N� N —> D � —� CL U> 4_ Ln >j j N> U p L (6 0 O N LLI L L-� U t qA > 0 0 >p a•+ C t +' m ++ C U (o L (6 > N 0 U N C .L : O 0 4- N +- (6 p 0 ate+ Q U- U- a to D to p 4- N to Q t to Cl- C .L ? O� t 0 to C > a Ln J 'L t t o o > L N u E U U l/) —_ (6 D o U U D 0 U m Q U U > ++ > 'L w (6 N CL (n Q (n (n - C t/) (6 N w A t� O N bJJ C n to D (n a� C '� L '� _ —_ t U to 4- a� C VI 0 •L O N >j a.., Q Q 0 E n (6 L p C U 0 'L cr 0 N U o� U t $ C O t VI C N C N C N L C r6 to >2 > C '5 (0 0 to U N to N N N— m � L. CL +�+ 1 : n 41 Q � ate- tail V N (>6 � +�+ O CL U> . +' 41 N> hA C p L 0 ?� N LLI C� v C> C1A 'L O L" U (o L 0 p N C , U +� ' N 0 0> L OA + + 0 '- to D N N O N r6 O 4- N to Q t to Cl- C .L ? to C > a Ln J t t o o H U D t > 4- L oA t l/) l/) L O U O > +, N (6 L (6 0 - C 0 to U (6 W U (6 � O p U O> D m a C dA N C > •L to C C (6 — to (6 t 4- C (6 hA C •� C -0 Q LU N N N > L Q O U 41 Q w *' — E 0 U U U U U >j N E t N= (6 0 N ? to > 4- H N to t N U Q U C +1 41 (6 p C -0 0 p U 0 ' 4- LY a.., 0 N 7; > � to � E > (6 N 0 Q N (6 qA Q OL w 2 Q p � L w (n Y •0 N OC > .> i� .� L p 1 r6 N L Gi fa 41 41 0 41 N 41 ~ 0 C (6 U D to 0 C L� '� aL+ O UO fa = C: � C -0 dA CL N to w O N> C to — L (6 ate+ (6 N fa r -6 (6 to C C L � 0— 4— a) N w 'v, 0 (6 �X .� E p 0 C +, L L 0 w -r +- +- to 0 (0 0 Q of � Q� LU c-I w J 0 J (o - 4 w N w A t� O N bJJ / w w ¥ � � t � f o E e / � (1) 0 § k CL fa 4-j » ® o $ 7 •� C: C: 2!� 3 E : > o / R @ u $ § LL w w o -0 4 } �� ± CLD 2 R U § ± § k d u t o U ¥ 2 � o � . . - § 3 E Q f Z > 2 ® G u \ 2 $ E .E § 2 ._ E o E » 7 >2 u 03/ > §'� o o w kC: c U k # 2 a u D u # 2 u t k § 2 £ •a 2 o D k fu P $ 2 P / fu M a r / L u w D / 41 § ƒ < 3 r Q w o t � 3 o E e / � (1) 0 § / fa 4-j 2 & 'a $ 7 2 C: C: o 2!� 3 E § / § o / R 2 d u $ § M o -0 W } t � 3 § 2 / § f a 4-j 2 & 'a $ 7 2 -C q D \ o k E R 2 d u $ § M f > W 3 U ± •e 2 R U - § E � o § o § 3 [ > 2 ® G m $ E .E � ._ E o E 4- ƒ §'� o o w L c U k \ & \ f U w w a h +, a� C t (1) -0 'n r� L +' oA D °' t *' O Q Q D U 0 t O t Q > Ln 4 — 0 4- > O C U C O p U C L o �� a� C O O� t + N O E oc 4- 4- _ L o-O C N u O N C a-+ O om - m O Q O 4a U N fa O C C m +, 0 0 t O O p L >> 7 w Q i O N O O m N 0 C-0 N" O ro > Q O > N OC N N?! C O in 0 0 fa U C L U C _ > +' L.L > L U 4- 0 O C tail i O ff-+ > Q Q p O C" C N O U p 4 p E (6 O O aO+ U C N `� U D C 6 O D 5 L Q (D .t N aO+ m o m C: VI L N U (6 0A D N � ~ N > vI O � (6 U (6 (C6 t ro t N- 0> N C H + Q Q-0 m L N C (6 a- 0 1 L D 0 0 : ro in in ro qA C D in 7 — +- C> U Q C O 4a 7 C (6 a�i m 0 u p O u o 0� o a) C 0 � Q O> t +O, N OU p 4-� i Q toil `- U C .P C N N +� N U Q dA N U fa fa — C 4- 0 N M> 0 0 p C 4- O r6 0 C- ro X hA '� L p L -0 p O N Q O Q p D� N fa L N O H O Q 0 O-0 (6 N in N O� O + O Q O H N O� �m� m Q w +, C t u O U fu vi U U Ln N L C p O O _0 + N > m + O -0 hA N U 0 0 0 2 OC U O N N p� C in m N -0 CL O O N 0 O~ - 0 C O c L> O C 0 Q O a� O C +- N C O +a N L C — N U LA O -0 Q— -� N� C p 0A > LL ' vi (6 N vI N O +- O C 0 .� iiA � V � > iiA D w L U L r C � .L > Q hA p L 0 4 O O VI > ul C +� U 4- i {n " t L (6 (6 0 m N -0 t O N N M - >, N H p 4- N N O +- O OA +- N (6 Q O C Y ate-+ D D ? O m L C 4- N N +�, J C N +' O +� 0> L VI VI O D U N N C.p 0 C 2 r6 C Q O L N (6 N U N O N +�, N hA L +� O N O `� hA vii r6 N r6 U N L=L N- N '� N t L L � N C O N D � C Q U U C N D •O +, : 0 t r6 O N— O O N +, N O Q O O 2 r6 D O t O 4- in w C O Q Li _Q N� a+ U (6 > 4- O U (6 N C L� m VI O N O OA ++ - 0 7 N� C (6 U N O (n (6 C U +� N C C (6 L p Q .� 0 C _ Q (6 N C m> > N> 0 BUJ > — j \ LL - U N L N N 00 N U t 0 0 U O Y M 4 p 4- � N M O t-0 O C-C 0 N 0 '' +.� VI ++ -0 Q r--+ � m C L (6 M ++ Q Q w A i t� N bJJ z x L! L +, o a) VI L L w Q w �'.i }i t VI Q in c p w ro Y D L � (6 Y E C U Q L L Q C C — ,� ro O O C4 mu E 0 u in 5) E : L � a) 2 oA o fa CL C: C: -C fa in C in 0 C vi D C° Q +, D X ra a) L o f m hA �, .� Q t o a) M fu 0 ro L }�,� ° 0 0 Q 0 0 Q C L ° > 0 E ro �o ro ro Ln m ra o ° 3 •Q Q C m E aw C w 42 > O Q in O D ru a) L Q in r� a) o ° a) L ° `� tvo a) 5 > — Q 0� o C U a) W o a) o L t Q E E o m I L �-•i O �..i L Z L Q a) 7 fu w c: E t O -0 O ° O o O O 0 0 a O in > N L ra O m 3 a) E ° a) C+ U Z a C Q L O ro > E� C o C Q E N ro X ro in hA fa O O U Y H A a) a) `n U E o Q a) U ro t L a) m Q t ±� 4 t a C a) 4- a) a) a) a) L O in d m O QQQ a C: c7 w V�j t � > m m (6 O a) fa i 'F ate+ m � >, U U +' > L.p Q Q Q �� O> Q ro E A Q O Q 5-0 o o E a c m e '� .� ax) a-0 w Q> D Q" u S•, w A 0 N bJJ w •VI u p L fa 4- C �_ O C H p a) °) a Q c W � VI E a) a) hA o a) in E X N o a) 4- VI in (6 C � C Q awi ,L U — (6 a•.i (6 D Q +�+ •� ,C in >j O VI E a) (6 'n (6 O cr U O (6 +- a) O 0 C 'Q .p — O = : O O Q L (D a) X U� C C O a-+ Q (6 •� a) 1-0 in O Q > O > > O (6 (6 O rr� O a) 0" O a) U C Q a) L a) tn a) O +� Y L N L (6 7 a) � a..� (6 C a) U a) (6 p a) Z Q a) M.- N •� -0 O (6 � +� -0 p a) C O O N L L O qA Q C ° a-+ q- (6 > > 0 a) O N O Q O OC Q C (6 +� °_0 i (6 4- O 7 C O a) C C .. N C in O a) in Y = i 4- .L in C: fa O C: N 2 (6 O Q Q fa (6 > a+ ate+ a) O Z a+ fu C-0 fa -C a) O E 'L O L O O O in E Z ate+ a) ° a) Q (6 Q .� Q (6 O a� VI N ++ in U in C a) � L O O a) L in .� C a) C a) C O � a) a) a) a) O ±'' +-� O L OA C .L a) O +' L O U (6 (6 (6 _ 42 U C C a) a) U° ro +, m w Q Q Q ° 0 U Q Y_0 a) 0 a) >, -0 o (L6 hA L a) 7 0 N C O C D D in U .� .� .� 7�� i E C •- fa Q OC in in (�6 vOi p +� N O N •O •Q •� 4-j in OLL _Q in a-+ Y O O L p a) m m 0 (6 4- � a) L � a) •C W U ro Q ro 7 L U a) 5 a•' a) L a'' '�+ •in VI C: p ate+ in ate+ LO a) O VII ?� Q E C " VI N u o C-0 fa 0 In _ (a a O U E'5 u � a) L o 0° J U C C u 4- O U a h1D _0 a) o O U G 0 E 0 C in O a) O `� U ate+ O C— O o p Q a) = U 0 C c.) L 4 qA VI LO VI C a) O 0 in ±' U ,s > fa VI •� > � (6 (6 a) (6 0 E E Y Q a) � p —_ W o L a) o o O L t fu o o _ a) a) O U 45 2 E 0 Q 2 2 � 07 E 1 .� H O O N 4O ro 4O - � .S ro S•, w A 0 N bJJ z x L! S-a ti w A I 0 N bJJ ° W L (6 N _ 0 +, a) O 1 (6 E C 01D 1 E a) M a O O Y C Y C1A E O O +' C °n O O a) C a) vi M :(n a-' m w M m hp C a) M t a) a) a) E C1A a) a) a p (6 E C1A OL a) 0 , + a) 4-j U L +' a C a a) a) L C O .� in +� N Z a) ~ O L � +� U � D + 4 > 4-j Y O M o O C 0 hA ate+ O a a-J hOiD L iS - JO N -0 a M — C1A +' a) (6 a) x Er C X U u a-+ M a) 4- o a) Y (6 a V Y N O C (6 o (6 C a) C E .E M U *' N a) a� .0 C, 1 a) -0 -0 p 0 a; -0 C w _ a N ON a +, U m u Z '� O a) hC1D U-0 ++ O O t 0 7 (6 0 a) O ro C ro a-+ ^ a C m C m L a) ate-+ •vI a C •� : a •� in in a C ro ro . _ a L (6 N U (6 m (6 0 t a) -0 a) a) aa)) (6 _ L -0 iS a) to a) L o W E 'Fn L 41 M X — m O 'L C L E M> to � (L6 .� C O a) (6 O N C L O O a ro C C w C C o Q (6 U •� C1A -0� O N N a) O +� a) C1A C in (6 a E t]A a) 41 t]A C a) — o Q U Q C a +� (p X C a) 4- O w a) C VI VI a) VI N Y O! (6 L Ci: C C L Q a) +u (6 (6 a) a) V L � a) (6 L 4' -a E O > (6 (6 `n a — (6 to t O (6 Q O E O Q O a) 0 O L C (6 E �+ O —_ a Y L U L in L a) L a (6 a C C � L a _� C — 41 (6 O C a+ °�1D M o a) (6 (6 E (6 'n a O (6 O a) C1A _ Q a) U 4- 3 hA C L O a m • {n C w m N U a hA °'° " 4- � _ w L r6 O O 12 Y a) a) in m in O C in a) C O > C !Y 0-0- t i �n L ate) C 0 C1A a) a) C �i a) a) O Y a) +� > a) a a) (6 in L � >j D ?� a) a L j > Q Q O v in U C cn > t O O L m L m O C >� O a-+ E O C O m •� —_ •� a) C u Q in m a L t C a) C- •� � O C ;_ a) O a) .� L a ro O O a +' a 4- Q C X � p0 U 4- M Z C N C O_0 +O_ p 7 U O O D t C VI C) a) (6 C a) -0 4 a — L U C N m Ui � C U •(6 > O U toil (6 a) O t 1 C L c.) t a) C m E c.) O m VI a a a) to > O O N O C a 0 + C L C a) C t •O m O in C > � M L m `� a U > a) °C'D E O a) a) a) LA a) a) C O '� C U •a C w m O O o a C L O (6 N u 2 w a D C a M O 4- M a M a O a) -0 a (n M M S-a ti w A I 0 N bJJ L (6 N w 0 4 1 C uj Y C Y X ate+ O a) U L m +' a) :(n a w z (6 a'" t U E C1A a (6 a p E in a) 0 , a) ro U > hA L C a t N Z a) ~ O L � > U D + > a C1A C i in U o * `n '� 0 hA u o a C O hOiD L m C N a) C1A C L m a) to pA C x Er C X U - (6 a-+ M 4- .N Y (6 a V Y a) Y M w o C a) > E M a� .0 C, M p 0 a; -0 C w a N ON a +, U m u Z '� O a) hC1D ++ O O t 0 (6 0 a) O a) C> a-+ ^ a C m L � : a C in in Z CL ro . _ a L: t a) E u a aa)) `� E (>6 a a) VI �1 41 O L O OC 'L C E a O C ro a) O a) O 41 N C >, O a ro C C w C C o (6 -0� O 41 N O +� C a E t]A 41 t]A U D U ro E Q a) (p X L (6 a) 4- O C VI VI a) VI N Y O! (6 L O C a) C (6 a) +u in (6 a) a � L U L (6 -a E O _ U �n — (6 U 0 w O Q Q Q O 0 V (6 E O Q p a) a O '0 4- U C a) L a) M a 1 -6 — a N C — 41 (6 O C a+ N M Z LU u (6 (6 > 'n to , 1 _ m U hA C L O a m {n C w m N U a hA °'° " 4- � *' U w L r6 O O 12 Y a) a) in m in O C in � C O > C !Y 0-0- t i �n (6 ate) C 0 C1A a) (6 a) O Y a) m > a) L C1A CL O `� m a j > Q Q v in U C cn > t O D O O . r6 > L +� a hA D 'x O w Q in a O a a) ;_ a) O a) .� L a�i ro O UC 3 M � a) (L6 4- M Z C a) N U G C a Y + 1 t °'� a) O O ° N m O N c n Ln N � > O U toil °'� O t 1 C t]A lY Q a) t > U a) a) L 41 . S-a ti w A I 0 N bJJ n H 1--1 W Z O V W J W N W H N 0 a J W 2 0 a J W Z N X W S-a V w A O N L L a) D 0 Q - t0 O Q VI a) Q ate+ T L O a) 4- a) > a) VI (6 U (6 4- 0 '�,� C +, Q C fu L Q C a) VI C: a) VI a) t H (6 7 O L ate+ E a) C O O Q U Q C a+ aO+ — ate+ C C 4- 7 L a) � w U� dA Q � w V Q 4- M a) a) ro W O fa y o o oA o C w 0 O 0 _ O o a) O O U Q U C O vI Q m a) vOi O O 4- (n a) + Q L O O L a; L a) � 4 -� V) M O +- > CiA �..i C W O L U V t (6 O 0 L W 0 O C .� VI u m OL o W �- -0 O L M D_ ate+ (n L + in C ) — U 6 U E . N C: O +- O +- C: O (6 N > O D O U D a-+ >- 4— U a+ C L 0 '0 i Q a W c 0 a U O O t v O O i Cl- 41 CL N N E L L _0 ° 0 O fu � O p O 41 41 N 0 a) t Ca) ) 6 > 00 Q _r 41 _ 4 O 4' 4- C U 4- fa to a) fa a) c ra E .0- 4O � •� -0 > +� fa a) L Q '� C 4- a) t U L C a+ M C t Q Ln a) O C Q OL ++ t > C Q > D O a) O W 0 O Q Q r6 (6 +N+ p 0 a) fu fa L U >� O N C C in t a) — a) f J Q O >� C - L a) a) I� a C w— a) � °� w C N m E C— N •� O a) O N -C-0 fu 0 > w L t (6 L c.) a) O C L o M L a) � t a) oc o p U +� C a a) C a) E +' n a) L L C Z �, a) a) �, a) O a LU t w a) C C 0 O cW.7 CO j 4a '� vOi t o (6 a) -0 (6 a) p r6 U " C Q C in a) C p C •O a) C C E CL C C U a) a) Q in ro O a) L t +� O In L O C t ++ t (6 a) u u L (U6 C 0 (6 4- 0 � >. °L W O u C: �-•� N a-+ _r a•+ Z C > C C O m 0 �_ (6 C C t> in O a) O -� ON 0 VI t (6 (L6 C E 7 0 C� +' t a) > a C W H O O C: C a) O pA (6 a) .� L C _0 u O Q `� 0 Q C C C O C a) C L 7 a) L— C a) CL t a; a) J U U a) .p m P a) t> w o ro U a) N L ro O d .� .L ra O p D '_ C C-r- 'n ro tvo tvo L a tL O O (n — (6 - > o (6 L p a) 0 0 0 4- (1) (1) L (1) O C > p r C OC O Q (6 Q Q 2 (6 m Q V) U L U (6 O fa > L w A t� N ors O W Q z 0 U W • N ti w A i 0 N bJJ 4..1 O o i N O p O O D 4- •� ON U r- 4O r6 p C p E> 4O U> O p+ hA O 4- E Er o 0 O � E p -0 a•+ • p L p L r6 L O VI N ^' L p Q Q p C U L a c p U � 4 N ++ p ++ O OC 4- M � X in > -0 m O w fu >` w fu p C: O p p C f E (6 4••1 Q {„ U hA p 4% in p U .Q hA > fu U L P O O E +� to p — N t -0 p >� p >� m OU O -r-(D-0 O m N — O c •0 C ro -0 C p .- to p a.., > in L p L r6 +, � O t U •Q L N> C � p— to 'L -C L p N C O r 4- C +p+ Q U O _ D Er p i _r_ C C C 4- t p 7 p fu — p vI ` N> C O VI ++ Q hA vI O 'n (6 O U N N t U p O a"1 a-+ C U O C t (6 (6 t C fa p vI j Q w C > C m p VI p > Q hCA a'nl p (6 C: ap+ •p p O p p p p p U N a•+ p a f, ro E U C C in O > C Q > M a• a'.1 p 'L N p > E E N C .0 > OL O (6 O O '7 m Q-o C � p N U U : C C O N > a p 7 C OL p L p N (6 >, VI m L C p N E E t r�6 C O O O O 0> N O N p O N C -0 B O N t -C L >- O � O C � Z U p O U r +' - N p N E v O ' C O 0 p Q > Q u fa 7 p p O U +- M C O C p-0 O o a C _p p O 7 C w a p 0 o O E '" 'L '5) p ra - W -0 C t m ra 2 w ra E °C: N (6 � m S L N U �' fa -0 N C Ol 00 > N > ��'' ' m t Y : (6 > U � D O L C N O d— 4- a-+ a-+ ate-+ 0 �' C E L O � > C N N .- Q O - p a•.1 p a•+ Cr m - vi C ,� O E E C +, ro � N H U p > O E UdA N o U X p p W C C p E Q O C � Z Q D� + O > a' p O N L (6 O O C N— C X p 0 p O X '- (n fa +, 0 Ln +- p- +- a U a p p E Q> r- O-0 U p N w 0 +- VI N ti w A i 0 N bJJ 4..1 O o D 0 r- (6 o« -2 O C-0 p o 0 O E to « U -U Q >` `! c 4- O w >` p p �� p C f �m M U 4••1 U U E p 4% C O U .Q U >� _ C 7 C — N t (6 Q C � O O .0 O 0 C O c •0 L O Q p p .- to p O U +' '� +- U a-•' .� L m ++ 4- p D Q O (6 L D Er VI N fa C C C p ++ p p VI ++ a"1 p0 'n C p VI p > C p (6 ap+ •p O Q p p p a-+ N OA U p N w U C C C C: O (6 > p p U '� +' (L6 (L6 C O N > O N t N O L O L > >, VI m L C p N Q- E t r�6 C � N O 0> N p O N C Q N t N M +� +' O :n +� 7 Q t Q E Q u fa 7 O ~ O O C N p 7 C O C N O E '" 'L p >` '� U Q C (6 (6 � p 4O U W U �' 4- O 0 Q� a� O VI p •C O ++ U � O d— -0 0 �' N E L � N N .- Q p N p a•.1 (6 Q p a•+ Cr +� L - vi C J E E C +, ro p N : , ro p f vI 4 +- N m E X p m E p p +� 0-0 a•.1 N O -.P •L O L p N o \ O co: 4- VI N C N— C X C X o ate-+ fa U to a+ to C >� 7 (6 (6 C (6 VI p fu OL OL O O L 4-j U .- (7 p 4-I p 0 p U C C L L O L p C VI N a•+ 4 U C p C Q Q m CL z a 4-j f u o > O Qom+ m Q H o p p ro hA x u- m vI (6 O' U p_ p p C p O p in C p (6 O C O- .� C = (6 E p C `n u C D .� p E — `-j p O m p M > Q U 'n m t L p E W N Q O M p O Q N O w U CU C 0 O a-•1 4- N to p 'n Q O O L t Q p Q •- in p 0 L N +' C O O (6 in U fa .O Q E N E ro Q 4- 4- O Q > U p ro C m p C N t O p to � to 0 � 0 w � t U N (6 W U� E O L Q a U> M O> 4- H U +-1 � N N ti w A i 0 N bJJ z 0 wl Q z 0 U wl x • 4 a-+ N U_ N_ C Q L Q (6 E o E a C M o CL W 4- C O qA O O 0 0 LA O U M N E L N w +' C N N � O � N � 0 } 4– C rl O vOi 'x co r6 O N C U D 0 O 7 C dA C Q N O C (6 > .x M in C U x L N O N - U N N (6 Q E (D Z Z O N w N Q W Z W D 1 ( U ?� _r_D> 4- a � 1 L L a) M 0 Ln D _ O cr Q O M L N U t E r � •L Q Q � t N (D ±' N N C � N O C in O t 7 Q U_ E •L L }1 U O � � N 4- C O O ±' C t O VI M a-•1 C: U m Q � (D � L- m (D U t M }1 M L U •L m In N � C >- (D m N Ea-+ t O C 0 U vOi > C O O C N C U Q M O N � > m N t qA U C �2 to C O N t O N O Q O Q N qA C M U N w i i t� N bJJ VI !E E U 1 1 4L D Q% in N O O N U O 41 L U +�+ 7 U _0 L >� O t Q Q E N U (7 dA C O C O �_ _ J �, 0 Q a L O � = Q +O+ to 0 +� 4- +' C U vI > 7 CL Q U C 1 0 Q O > O N C 4 N 4- t 7 0 in E C N O ro E °a a U in (� OU N N C O U U Q N L N ++ tn U O U C O = U J U E Q (n M > O +� M( L t U Q (n t N Q in (6 .Q C > 7 > 4 vi - N �_ M U N O O 4- hA P L N (6 U O D— M N O Q ate_ D% � 0 C C Q~ N m 0 >— r6 t +' • (n m O -0 N M U O N N qA O O Y > r6 O `� O w C C ate-' Q C O U O J m O N O x 0 Q C �_ O O C t +' hA C vOi C a) Q 7 a� (n Q N — to 0 +� 0 1 O hA in pA U (6 r6 C w O U > N L O (6 O N N N w L C L Q C" C N rU6 +' hA t 7 :� N O in C : 0 C N 4- N `� O N a N ~ +' Y 7 C N to to N 7 to N Q �n 0 w u Co N a .0 C �_ O M a •O - O t O N ++ L Y °C C O CU Q t O O N t M 0 -0 > •L N 2 ro +� N L) C 4-•1 N 1 C m L � m N> (V O�> +' > U > L N L O N 0 0 0 O E (6 O � 0 1 C 0 Q L Z U i C +� N E� N L C O +� M (6 Z Q �O L D O N N N N a-+ > N O ate-+ � O Q a-+ N t a a'.' t M +�•1 t (L6 C +� (� hA C 4a a) cur 0 O 0 t 0 N t �L L 0 .X •� 1E am) t 0 N � 1� O (6 C L Q Vi 4••1 N D L = M ._ O 4- r V 4- a•+ Q .- N 7 4 a-+ N U_ N_ C Q L Q (6 E o E a C M o CL W 4- C O qA O O 0 0 LA O U M N E L N w +' C N N � O � N � 0 } 4– C rl O vOi 'x co r6 O N C U D 0 O 7 C dA C Q N O C (6 > .x M in C U x L N O N - U N N (6 Q E (D Z Z O N w N Q W Z W D 1 ( U ?� _r_D> 4- a � 1 L L a) M 0 Ln D _ O cr Q O M L N U t E r � •L Q Q � t N (D ±' N N C � N O C in O t 7 Q U_ E •L L }1 U O � � N 4- C O O ±' C t O VI M a-•1 C: U m Q � (D � L- m (D U t M }1 M L U •L m In N � C >- (D m N Ea-+ t O C 0 U vOi > C O O C N C U Q M O N � > m N t qA U C �2 to C O N t O N O Q O Q N qA C M U N w i i t� N bJJ O N W Q z U W x (6 Q D Q fu U N t O 0 C (1) Q O a C (6 C O S•, ti w A i rl O N 4- E N > N L Q (6 2 0 0 O �_ C C O O W N � Q C m L Q L L IO Q VI VI � a-+ fu (6 N � H � � a.., (6 �� a-+ - VI N (6 Q > O O VI dA ate+ N N qA 60 O O N 6 (6 > C � m C N O Q Q 0-0 E Q L C 0 O 7 N Q ate+ C '� m N C U Q L U U E U r6 > O > 0 a D (6 � O Y N N O Q U (6 (6 E — � hA ,- U D +' C hA E> E O 7 Lr O a) r6 t OU O �n O 4- L 7 VI 0 fa U fa D _ O D t t (6 D t O U O 4- L U U � C — +m+ = a-+ ' 0 t Q C O C E C: -E O O 0 Q U > Q 0 O ++ C N t 0> U a•+ N C N C VI d � 7 Q > N t CD � •Ln fa ro Y> O L O �.., > > .� .0 i6 L C U O to L N N 4-•� 4••, L C Q O C CL (6 O fa U (6 m Q O N C O x _ C 4-���, O L m (6 Q 4- o m u N ' � O L C a-+ U io N a CU C L � — Z 4.., •� L 'Q 0 > Q Q Q Ln 4- 4 O qA a� O a•., O Q m C • (6 ++ O Q� �-• Q L Q 4.., E (6 Ln L L 4-j a+ +� U C u -6 L Q N 0 hA C O U O> fu N > N t m a +, > in N �, ?� r6 Q C 1 Q in N in Q N C O N a+ O L N E Q O 7 E +' N O hA L Q ,� (6 E O O 4- N OU Z7 H .� Z N U N U N O 4' U +4a `� 4-j 4- N N E U N N U> O t 0 O v> > C L C in O N +' hA > N N > D t Y C C +� ro C O N O CL 4- E X4-4 -o� > �.0 m �,> �,� ° "u 4-° U�� hA O aC L— O �� O O 12 U CUC G L C: Q Ln L i6 � —> -r- o > a� L (1) � hA (1) � C C ++ `� (6 ++ O a-+ — t a•+ O O ate+ C N Q t VI C (6 t L (6 U O N N � C O w N w a-+ O t C in ++ m a-+ E o M O •E L a-+ O M a.., U N +' 7 N ±+ •O C 2 L O 0 in H N hA N L vOi L p OU O V C `� 0 O •7A 4- r6 0 C O Q � C CUC G i6 x U cI Y U O >� +� d C VI N C C O— N J (6 O (6 ?� Q > ++ O> a 'n L x 4 N C L ' VI Q m 4a C > O Q t in +N 1 O Q a+ Q N Q C C: N CL Q O (6 � (6 O N i ° Q C (6 tea> + ; N z a � o D L o D a+ Q 4- C> D o �+ JN .� J = .� 7 `� a+ C o D o' a+ a °' a -C +� r� O� ru a) w 5 +� a > > LA fa > c �, ra E O 0 Q— 0 O D C: N >: in aUi O D a ++ Q U (6 >O X C L Qom-+ U > C J Z— C Z (6 ate+ — L VI (�6 7 (n +�+ C LJJ •- -o E N (6 C O t +�+ Q (6 Q C 41 Q a U 7 U G1 � N > N E J> C (6 � Q. > C Q C m C N N ++ 41 0 N ate+ O O L ++ Q (f6 O_0 > .0 ° Q t U > 4- > Q � w Q� � 4—' C (6 Q D Q fu U N t O 0 C (1) Q O a C (6 C O S•, ti w A i rl O N �7umKe y o _ 1_NVJ C� onsulting, LLC MEMORANDUM 2533 West Pinyon Ave Grand Junction, CO 81505 970 - 985 -4001 TO: Dan Feeney, PE, Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) FROM: Skip Hudson, PE DATE: September 30, 2014 RE: Delivery and Service Vehicles on West Meadow Drive This memo was originally submitted to the Town of Vail (TOV) on September 16. This version of the memo has been revised to reflect all comments (except one) from the TOV Community Development Department dated September 22. The fourth comment about using actual traffic counts instead of ITE trip generation was not updated in this memo. This memo addresses the delivery and service vehicle traffic on West Meadow Drive. The information in the Table 1 is based on the current delivery vehicle information provided by the VVMC Facilities group, and your email regarding the VVMC service vehicles. Table 1 shows the existing VVMC traffic volumes on West Meadow Drive. It is anticipated that these numbers will not change significantly after the Master Plan construction is completed. Even though the VVMC will be larger in size, employee more people, and serve more patrons and guests, it is anticipated that the same number of delivery trucks will visit VVMC — they will just deliver or pick -up more stuff each trip. Table 1 — VVMC Delivery and Service Trips on West Meadow Drive Vehicle Type Peak Hour Traffic Volume 1,2 vehicles per hour Daily Traffic Volume' (vehicles per day) [Based on Monday, which has the highest number of Daily Deliveries] AM Peak Hour (7:30 am — 8:30 am) VVMC Peak Hour (10:00 am — 11:00 am) PM Peak Hour (4:00 pm — 5:00 pm) Delivery 6 10 1 8 1 503 Service 4 2 2 2 8 Total 8 12 10 58 Notes: 1. The Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Volumes represent the total number of trips IN and trips OUT; for example, the Total Daily Traffic Volume of 58 for Delivery and Service Vehicles represents 29 vehicles that make 29 trips IN plus 29 trips OUT for a total of 58 daily trips. 2. The AM and PM peak hours are based on the peak hours at the Vail Road and West Meadow Drive intersection; the highest hour for delivery and service vehicles to /from the VVMC ( "VVMC Peak Hour") occurs from 10 am to 11 am. 3. 6 of the 50 trips are made by semi - trucks with trailers [one WB -50 and two W13-40s]; the rest of the trips are made by single -unit trucks [SU -30 or smaller]. 4. The service vehicles are pick -up trucks or large vans [SU -30 or smaller]. Page 1 of 2 Table 2 compares the background (non-VVMC) traffic on West Meadow Drive to the VVMC delivery and service vehicles that will be on West Meadow Drive after the VVMC Master Plan construction is completed. The VVMC main entrance will be relocated to the 170 South Frontage Road so the only VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will be delivery and service vehicles. Table 2 — Compare VVMC Traffic Volumes on West Meadow Drive Traffic Volume Source Peak Hour Traffic Volume (vehicles per hour) Daily Traffic Volume (vehicles per day) AM Peak Hour (7:30 am — 8:30 am) PM Peak Hour (4:00 pm — 5:00 pm) Passenger Vehicles 33 81 294' Background Traffic Buses 14 2 202 2402 Total 47 101 536 VVMC Traffic (Delivery and Service Vehicles only) 8 10 58 3 Total (Background + VVMC) 55 111 594 VVMC as % of Total 15% 9% 10% Notes: 1. The daily traffic volume on West Meadow Drive is not known; the 294 vehicles per day was estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual (ITE Land Use 260 Recreational Homes; there are 93 residential units that access West Meadow Drive). 2. Bus numbers estimated based on frequency /headway information provided by Vail Transit. 3. Based on Monday, which has the highest number of Daily Deliveries Page 2 of 2 M f N c•> •s m d d C� C i C O C a N N � a�o�o U O L N E r > 4 a Z N = � O 4 � d F m m y InO N O N N M M N N O Y7 T N N N N j H 0 m m 0 a t K i o .> <D M 0 1. G1 c Z O N E 3 � � Q (uOlSlnla aaZ!I!aa3S) SSH m o 0 o O N sua ;s b O U O a leolpaw 310 n Q) O) S) o o ealdsOH w C a m c IOS-eMl bulplaM Sn Z Q Q) o j as ;sew weals O O O N 04 04 C N O saaunoC) Ie;ldsOH LO LO LO LO LO > R H ;uawabeuew Sleua;ew — y > 0 aa;eM adolS uaa;se — Q 6ulpuan auldly Aalea uosugoy — m a m Aaajee plOE) Mopeaw — L a� _ 2 aa!y auldly •L 0 d a opna;saa;uauanooa IleOay >_ .0 G1 n IOb-8M1 aloo lsded L O Sdn NNNNN ox 3 p a d N N N (,I N sdsn a OOSIy m m aa�iG3S = uObeM (auOH Iles iiVE) ;ulodgsaad Aaanllaa IOMOJ Aae;ela ap (olaa ;s IOb-8M1 OOs (S SHd (6 MEN (6 N N U N r N n U 3 t lL a Q 0 L O E m C L N 0 L 0 m E `o 0 I? D U) m U L N > N � N n O Z 0 0 O � Vendor Deliveries (Information Provided by VVMC Facilities Group): Monday: PHS - Panel Van - 2 a.m. Stericycle - Panel Van - 5 a.m. Freshpoint - Panel Van - between 4am — 7am G &K - Panel Van - 6 a.m. Vail Honey Wagon - Garbage Truck - 7 a.m. Alsco -Panel Van - between 8am — 11 am Stryker - Panel Van - between 7am — 9am USPS - Postal Van - 9 a.m. FedEx - Panel Van - 10am and 4pm UPS - Panel Van - 10am and 4pm Meadow Gold Bakery - Panel Van - between 10am — 2pm Robinson Dairy - Panel Van - between 10am — 2pm Alpine Vending - Panel Van - between 10am — 1 pm Western Slope Water -Panel Van - between 9am — 12pm Materials Management - Panel Van - 1 P.M. Hospital Couriers - Passenger Van - 8:20am, 10:20am, 12:20pm, 2:20pm, 4:20pm Hospital Shuttles - Passenger Van - 7:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 9:00 AM, 10:00 AM, 11:30 AM, 12:30 PM, 1:35 PM, 2:35 PM, 3:35 PM, 4:35 PM, 5:35 PM, 7:30 PM, 8:30 PM (approximates per schedule) Tuesday: PHS - Panel Van - 2 a.m. Sysco - Panel Van - between 4am — 9am G &K - Panel Van - 6 a.m. Stryker - Panel Van - between 7am — 9am USPS - Postal Van - 9 a.m. FedEx - Panel Van - 10am and 4pm UPS - Panel Van - 10am and 4pm Alpine Aire - Panel Van - No set time Materials Management - Panel Van - 1 P.M. - 1 - Hospital Couriers - Passenger Van - 8:20am, 10:20am, 12:20pm, 2:20pm, 4:20pm Hospital Shuttles - Passenger Van - 7:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 9:00 AM, 10:00 AM, 11:30 AM, 12:30 PM, 1:35 PM, 2:35 PM, 3:35 PM, 4:35 PM, 5:35 PM, 7:30 PM, 8:30 PM (approximates per schedule) Wednesday: PHS - Panel Van - 2 a.m. Freshpoint - Panel Van - between 4am — 7am G &K - Panel Van - 6 a.m. Vail Honey Wagon - Garbage Truck - 7 a.m. Stryker - Panel Van - between 7am — 9am USPS -Postal Van - 9 a.m. FedEx - Panel Van - 10am and 4pm UPS - Panel Van - 10am and 4pm Pepsi - Semi Trailer - between 10am — 12pm Materials Management - Panel Van - 1 P.M. Hospital Couriers - Passenger Van - 8:20am, 10:20am, 12:20pm, 2:20pm, 4:20pm Hospital Shuttles - Passenger Van - 7:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 9:00 AM, 10:00 AM, 11:30 AM, 12:30 PM, 1:35 PM, 2:35 PM, 3:35 PM, 4:35 PM, 5:35 PM, 7:30 PM, 8:30 PM (approximates per schedule) Thursday: PHS - Panel Van - 2 a.m. Sysco - Panel Van - between 4am — 9am Stericycle — Panel Van - 5 a.m. Dietary Towel Delivery - Panel Van - 6am G &K - Panel Van - 6 a.m. Vail Honey Wagon - Garbage Truck - 7 a.m. Stryker - Panel Van - between 7am — 9am Alsco -Panel Van - between 8am — 11 am Western Slope Water -Panel Van - between 9am — 12pm USPS -Postal Van - 9 a.m. FedEx - Panel Van - 10am and 4pm �2� TiTaEFro - 10am and 4pm Materials Management - Panel Van - 1 P.M. Hospital Couriers - Passenger Van - 8:20am, 10:20am, 12:20pm, 2:20pm, 4:20pm Hospital Shuttles - Passenger Van - 7:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 9:00 AM, 10:00 AM, 11:30 AM, 12:30 PM, 1:35 PM, 2:35 PM, 3:35 PM, 4:35 PM, 5:35 PM, 7:30 PM, 8:30 PM (approximates per schedule) Friday: PHS - Panel Van - 2 a.m. Freshpoint - Panel Van - between 4am — 7am G &K — Panel Van - 6 a.m. Vail Honey Wagon — Garbage Truck - 7 a.m. Stryker - Panel Van - between 7am — 9am Coke - Semi Trailer - between 8a -10a Recall Document Destruction - Panel Van - between 8am -12pm USPS — Postal Van - 9 a.m. FedEx — Panel Van - 10am and 4pm UPS — Panel Van - 10am and 4pm Meadow Gold Bakery - Panel Van - between 10am — 2pm Robinson Dairy - Panel Van - between 10am — 2pm Materials Management - Panel Van - 1 P.M. Hospital Couriers - Passenger Van - 8:20am, 10:20am, 12:20pm, 2:20pm, 4:20pm Hospital Shuttles - Passenger Van - 7:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 9:00 AM, 10:00 AM, 11:30 AM, 12:30 PM, 1:35 PM, 2:35 PM, 3:35 PM, 4:35 PM, 5:35 PM, 7:30 PM, 8:30 PM (approximates per schedule) No Set Schedule (as needed): Steam Master - Panel Van - After 6pm US Welding - Semi Trailer - before 6am, day of the week varies and depends on needs Hospira - Panel Van - before 6am, day of the week varies and depends on needs GE Medical - Panel Van - here at least once a week and between 8am — 2pm Steris - Panel Van - here at least once a week and between 8am — 2pm HSS (Sterilizer Division) - passenger cars - here one day a week, and between hours of 8am — 2pm �3� : to iw U )Q CO LL -Z LL : LlJ 1p :U �Z Q f- cn LU .r-) ' LL 10- NWN VJ O J U Z W W d' p Ur � M II W p Eo w w w a 2 ± 0 w U a 0 z 2% \ LLI �0 \ / z LL \ I z � �o4w� -§ \ °° < <±m3I }/7°0/ - 0@0 \\± > / / \ §/$ _.I 1 1 w LU N Z LL O W U J z LL Q Y� o U_ �Q = Y LU U LU J CO m W zCD vU Z 0 Ir JQ � z f [Ulf) :U) !w -U in >w z �LL :w io ud �z 'ry CO �w in 'w it Z Q J w [L p c� O p N! n ZCon Q O C J �V-- � � � � � � � � � _ � � � : � .� met .� m � � � � e i ■ / � i \ Q ,� 2 ,> c to / % m42 J g � � « o A 7 / e e cu \ & � q � � � k � � O � _ e # c � ©A� « «% ) ° � 7 t � y ; o v x 4 =' > p 'us Vii. Cr �J.+ •�t sa ., p �, + a u O (IS CIS v, g M 0) p.N p � r, a R *Q d C 00 Q p r/] ;+ qp (s + U.) �, w J v �, w �+W p D vy �r CA cz 'G9 'rn as 0 cc h+� �" j� d vy z Q a� v En fCS '�; M t r cu Cd Lr, v v e v + o it p p P� q1 Ln r' O b 0. m w G. m r p co tLo En F-I " �_ P-4 cl] H tI� �+ ca C�1 w a rrTT�� ❑ W W h� •-A ai C GJ > a LL o � w V M-4 M Iiu— gg i I NA MA 2? , I t R-,,q D s i 4 � all. ui E LU uj UA R5! M�Pqgx Rut U. !M-Pll a z 0. catiH 0 LU VW uj ar 0 co aA o WE z Z 0 0 UJ > LLI CK ui m m m IlL vJ Ul rCt tb M u Z w z P4 Ln LU z vJ Ul rCt tb M u Z w z P4 Ln q V� nY �. Ln � O a� ar C m vl u vi co > D cu > v U � r y 6J .0 +.• Q �+I ■= i r 1 °' m z 'o a" r-+�+ Ras w 41t a w o} Qj D qj r R C� p 0 cu R C tei �+w C It bA o tz as D m 3 � b a o va uo x � cn v w Ln %] CU 3 Tn 7j U .x ^e-- COY] (z Ln . m cc LO C CL �jJ r �Y Cr a � i� t� JZ r� o� .i� Q eta G- a u aQ �3 0 a �u w � o Z� Q� ❑7 y J Iz u o ri ru o CZ C) a, " V v u w �z cu `' 't C) LO C CL �jJ r �Y Cr a � i� t� JZ r� o� .i� Q eta G- a u aQ �3 0 a �u w � o Z� Q� M w a. L .v YdYlr,7v�r r T i t Q � r d.1 tom. a 4.1 D 0 biz '(z q -F+ %J4 C R C C c c C L k F 0% �o H �u r C 7 C � a o a 7 W .i a '3�i b 0 a� A Q7 3 Lo © {C Q r T i t Q � r d.1 tom. a 4.1 D 0 biz '(z q -F+ %J4 C R C C c c C L k F 0% �o H �u r C 7 C � a o a 7 W .i a '3�i o � o un v a° CU y c� Ln , E CA En Zu c� Q � U a a � cn � 1 Ln � a x 0 a o F! as r 41C] I tQ r o " a� r7 � v s. co s., ro CL w m F 0 � u R" m ® m a a ni a Q d iz 1- ..7 ® a c cv u a d� .a a; H 0 a �r w w p d � � p w � O � a� cv rn � �• D oa � ': U H u a� mLn tz o aj 1 64 cll 4' O `' 4j A "d a a � cn � 1 Ln � a x 0 a o F! as r 41C] I tQ r o " a� r7 � v s. co s., ro CL w m F 0 � u R" m ® m a a ni a Q d iz 1- ..7 ® a c cv u a d� .a a; H 0 a �r w w p d � � p w � O � z Sr r.. CC QJ b CJ CIJ 0 N un C v 10 a 0 CU w � +; CU o A 0 o a �' w " y 'r- U Gl V w t Mw �, R 0. 0.> o R CL) W RRy CG CC cu Q � Q It 0 .. a •q) ❑n d y c� M aj y u 0. w U = 0) Qj w Au Q O 0.0 wfli r � -.Hr r ayey' � urn r G R "C 'w R, vQ R Q O CU 4J Z 3 c m m o .� U r3 A C1` E.1 w In a,. e u Q Uy w1 ih ry c� Q2 � a � 6 C� V Z a W b� 2 � �G v ti 3 9j r' iE i x R � � 9 cp 'ts U u' a Q c�u ai 7�. $'n � o Yr. � a 0 u 0 � u w ai Q � a O z � ❑i I ME ': ' ; w c^ Ln tj in ,- - rh v v cu > ca _ � w ++ �j it 't �y U n7 iii 'L, u r3 I �Vy 4 tb D —Q) S; rl, CU fa u 44 a w u ca a, ° o .cs .c7 to o U = a Q � . u °; CU 7�j aj tr— rz , a v :5 cu a a o ad u gZ 41 bz > mr, ed b 1 > C3, td cu v (U ca rS ci .0 a $'n � o Yr. � a 0 u 0 � u w ai Q � a O z � ❑i I ME ': ' " " f 7 C i G G I F C L t F r 7J ] U ul a � ] s _y r :J r•'S 7 C o C ro a W zp a � C ❑ r 73 -" U y a. ° o J [F Q: a CU to 8 dw b4 u a� Li � 'T� n �, cu v •� Cl $-4 U lC iG 7J cu O cu ate+ fli NtL r"� 0 �"� S[FrW^i! a cu Vol au U CS 60 r+ X. .r ti O� ... aJ . ECG., r�+� (T y^ CU M c • CL dui W RS +.L/ � W .�• � ��W+ " " f 7 C i G G I F C L t F r 7J ] U ul a � ] s _y r :J r•'S 7 C o C ro a W zp a � C ❑ r 73 U y a. ° o J [F Q: a CU to 8 dw b4 u a� Li � 'T� n �, cu v •� Cl lC iG 7J cu O cu ate+ fli NtL r"� CIS �"� S[FrW^i! " " f 7 C i G G I F C L t F r 7J ] U ul a � ] s _y r :J r•'S 7 C o C ro a W zp a � C ❑ r VVMC Master Plan Parking Analysis October 9, 2014 Purpose of Analysis The purpose of this analysis is to address five parking - related elements of the VVMC Master Plan: 1. Calculate parking requirements for the VVMC based on different parking formulas. 2. Inventory VVMC's existing parking resources (both on -site parking spaces and parking management programs) and based on this and the two parking requirement formulas determine the existing parking deficit. 3. Determine the appropriate formula to use for calculating VVMC's parking requirement. 4. Estimate the approximate parking demand that will result from future expansion plans. 5. Define generally how VVMC can address future parking requirements from Master Plan expansions. Existing Parking Requirements Zoning codes utilize a wide variety of methodologies for determining parking requirements. Most of these involve consideration of square footage, number of patient beds, number of exam rooms, number of employees or some combination thereof. The Town of Vail Zoning Code utilizes patient beds and square footage ratios to determine parking for "hospitals ". Square footage calculations are used to determine parking requirements for "medical offices ". VVMC believes that these formulas are outdated and not the most accurate indicator of future parking needs. Existing improvements at the VVMC were evaluated relative to two different formulas — Method 1 uses the standards outlined in the Town of Vail zoning code and Method 2 is an "employee based" formula. Method 2 is suggested by the VVMC as a more accurate and appropriate formula for determining parking requirements than a square footage based method. Method 2 has been used in the past by VVMC and has been acknowledged by the Town in previous review processes. The merits of Method 2 and the short - comings of the formula prescribed by the Town code are discussed in greater detail below. VVMC Parking Analysis Page 1 Calculations provided below include the main hospital, all lessees within the hospital (i.e. Colorado Mountain Medical, the Steadman Clinic) and all uses within the US Bank Building (with the exception of the US Bank). Method 1— TOV Formula: Hospital - 1 space per patient bed plus 1 space /150 sf net floor area Medical offices - 1 space per 200 sf net floor area Professional offices —1 space per 250 sf net floor area Professional or Medical offices in US Bank Building —1 space per 370 sf net floor area Square footages of all applicable uses within the main hospital building the US Bank Building were calculated. Within the main hospital building the 1/150sf ratio was used for all hospital functions (ED, operating rooms, OBGYN, imaging, administration, etc.), the 1 /200sf ratio was used for medical offices that operate independent of the hospital (such as the Steadman Clinic and Colorado Mountain Medical), and the ratio of 1/250sf was used for professional offices (defined as office uses that do not directly serve patients). The same approach was taken with the US Bank Building, however this lot is located within the Town's Commercial Core Parking Area and as such a ratio of 1/370sf was used for medical and professional offices. Parking requirements for both buildings were then added together and a multi -use credit (20 %) was applied. This approach indicates a total parking requirement of 697 parking spaces. A table summarizing this analysis is found on the next page. Floor plan diagrams defining the square footage of specific uses are found at the end of this report. VVMC Parking Analysis Page 2 VVMC Parking Calculations - Existing Condition 4/1712014, updated 5/6/14, 5/14/14 Method 1 - Town of Vail Code 1 space per patient bed plus 1 space /150 sf net floor area - hospital 1 space per 200 sf netfloor area - medical offices 1 space per 250 sf net floorarea - professional offices 2.7/10005F, or 1 space per 3705F for medical and professional offices In US Bank Building - lot is within Comm Core area VVMC US Bank Buildin. * Units Rate Spaces Units Rate Spaces Patient Beds 58 58 Patient Beds 0 0.0 Basement Level Level 1 Dining 3,513 1/150 23.4 Steadman Clinic 1448 1/370 3.9 Admin 591 1 /150 3.9 HH Sports Medicine 2374 1/370 6.4 SPRI 7,033 1/250 28.1 sub -total 10.3 Conference /other 1,876 1/150 12.5 Level Level 1 Avanti Cardio 1832 1/370 5.0 Pharmacy /Gift Shop 1,440 1/150 9.6 Vacant 1012 1/150 6.7 Carido /I magi ng /Sterile /Pharm 10,955 1/150 73.0 Conference 403 1/150 2.7 Emergency Roam /Imaging /OC 12,189 1/150 81.3 HR 1054 1/150 7.0 Imaging 710 1/150 4.7 Info Technology 2286 1/150 15.2 Co Mtn Medical 4,216 1/200 21.1 sub -total 36.7 Howard Head 5,136 1/200 25.7 Level 3 Steadman Research 5,474 1/250 21.9 Vail Summit 1795 11370 4.9 Level 2 VVMC Multi -Spec 2695 1/370 7.3 OB /GYN 11,580 1 /150 77.2 Steadman office 724 1/370 2.0 Patient Care 1 13,750 1/150 91.71 VVMC Dev Office 949 1 /150 63 Admin 2,998 1/150 20.0 Vacant 422 1/150 2.8 ICU 2,144 1/150 14.3 Steadman Admin 2034 1/370 5.5 Lab /Staff /Anes 3,923 1 /150 26.2 sub -total 28.7 Mtn Surgical 1,792 1/200 910 Steadman Clinic 2,208 1/200 11.0 Level 3 * =The US Bank Building will be remodeled in the Surgical Suite and Recovery 9,853 1/150 65.7 near future. Parking numbers will be re- calculated Surgery Center 12,556 1/150 83.7 when final plans are available. Steadman Clinic 6,511 1/200 32.6 USBank Building (from table above) Leven 3,822 varies 10.3 Level 6,587 varies 36.7 Level 8,619 varies 28.7 Sub-Total 139,476 870.2 Multi Use Credit 20.00% 174.0 Total Parking Requirement 696.2 VVMC Parking Analysis Page 3 Method 2 — Employee Based Formula: 1 space per patient bed 1 space per exam room 1 space per day shift employee The VVMC has 58 licensed patient beds and 155 exam rooms. An exam room includes any room, station, or other location where a patient is seen by a health care provider. For example, in addition to a traditional exam room, a station for physical therapy is also considered an exam room. An employee census for all VVMC departments and for lessees (such as Colorado Mountain Medical, the Steadman Clinic, etc.) was completed this past winter to determine the typical number of day -shift employees. The parking demands for each of the three considerations were totaled and a multi -use credit (17.5 %) was applied. This approach indicates a total parking requirement of 645 spaces. The table summarizing this approach follows and the floor plan diagrams defining patient beds and exam rooms are found at the end of this report. VVMC Parking Analysis Page 4 VVMC Parking Analysis Page 5 VVMC Parking Calculations - Existing Conditions 8- May -14 Method 2 - "Employee -based formula" Formula 1 space per patient bed 1 space per patient exam room 1 space per M -F day -shift employees Existing Parking Requirement Units Spaces Patient Beds 58 58 Patient Exam Rooms 155 155 Employees Dietary 15 15 VMMC 371 371 VV EM Phy 3 3 Rad 1 1 MSA 4 4 Apollo 10 10 CM M 17 17 Steadman Clinic 98 98 VSO 10 10 SPRI 35 35 Ambulance 3 3 Pediatric 2 2 Employee total 569 Sub -total 782 Multi -Use Credit 17.5% reduction 137 Total Required Parking 1 1 645 VVMC Parking Analysis Page 6 Parking Resources and Existing Parking Deficit An inventory of all VVMC existing parking resources was completed. This inventory includes all on -site parking spaces, employees served by parking management programs and off -site parking spaces utilized by hospital staff. On -site Parking The VVMC has a total of 407 parking spaces. These spaces are located on the main west lot, the east parking structure, and at the US Bank Building. A diagram depicting these spaces is found on the following page. Currently the west lot parking is used primarily by guests and patients while the east structure is used by employees. Both employees and patients utilize parking at the US Bank Building. ECO Bus Passes The VVMC has on average over the past few years purchased 60 ECO bus passes for use by employees. Shiittlac The VVMC operates employee shuttles and based on survey information gathered this past winter on average they were used by 32 employees per week. It is assumed that this usage is consistent throughout the winter. Off -Site Parking The VVMC (and lessees) this past winter purchased 140 parking passes for the Lionshead Parking Structure and an additional 30 spaces Solaris. VVMC's total parking resources include: 407 surface and structured spaces at VVMC and USB Building 32 shuttles 60 bus passes 140 LH Structure parking passes 30 Solaris Parking passes 669 total VVMC Parking Analysis Page 7 VVMC Parking Analysis Page 8 s (1) ­zr i� Za') LLJ W �O Zw OfO~ �w LLI F- LL UZ v0 Ur Z W~ Z O O �w LLw ww ¢Z wZ w U) ix LLJ 0 U) Id_ W w �-- Z:) CO z-- =Lw cnw U) to Co � Z) U) p� (D U) YO Y W YO Z�'Z Z cw mU) ma- m� Q v U) (f) cn U) fl -- CJ cep m U) uJ ° 1 � 1 � r L-1 a %�! 0 J W W 0 Q Z tt w (� W U7 U) W U a U) ti 0 J W W 0 Q Z u- W LLJ cf) CO W w U CO h Q w C� Z a( W OZ �w ow O � U LIJ a fA N a w w x -:: z nQn I..L V z (1) X W W w z w C.i J Q U� Z Ld } Q wa z �+ �W o JN N CL �w a VVMC Parking Analysis Page 9 Evaluation of existing parking resources would indicate the current parking need at VVMC to be 669 spaces. The 407 on -site spaces address a significant portion of this need and the 92 employees who utilize shuttles and bus passes essentially equate to 92 parking spaces (these types of programs are permissible in accordance with section 12 -10 -20 of the Town Code). The 170 off -site spaces do not conform to the standards for off -site parking and have not been reviewed or approved by the town. As such it could be concluded that the current parking deficit is 170 spaces. In apply this same approach to the parking requirement based on the two formulas outlined above, the parking deficit would be 198 spaces for Method 1— the Town of Vail Code and 146 spaces for Method 2 — the employee based approach. It is noteworthy that existing conditions parking and the two parking formulas all result in relatively similar numbers. Suggested Parking Formula for use at VVMC — Method 2 Method 2, the employee -based formula is recommended as the most accurate indicator of parking demand at VVMC. This formula is based on one parking space for each employee during a typical day -shift period, one parking space per patient bed and one parking space per exam room. The formula is effective because it directly targets each of the main users of VVMC — employees who work at the Center and patients who are either staying at the hospital or visiting the Center. The Town's square footage based formula applies a very high ratio of parking (1 space /150 SF for all hospital square footage) when compared to many other zoning codes. In addition, the code requirement as written unnecessarily "over- assesses" parking requirements for specific uses at the hospital. For example: • The Town code requires 1 space per 150SF for the hospital cafeteria. The overwhelming majority of cafeteria patrons are employees and patient visitors, users that are already accounted for by parking requirements imposed on other hospital uses. The parking requirement for the cafeteria is 23 parking spaces. The typical number of cafeteria employees is 15, a difference of 8 spaces more than necessary to "park" this use. While not a large number of spaces, the disparity becomes much greater with the Master Plan expansion. • The definition of "net floor area" only excludes common areas (lobbies, hallways, restrooms) that are common to the entire building. This means roughly 7,700SF of such spaces within Howard Head, the Surgery Center, the Steadman Clinic and other uses cannot be excluded from parking calculations. This nuance of the parking code VVMC Parking Analysis Page 10 unnecessarily adds approximately 40 spaces to the existing parking requirement. This disparity will become much more significant with the Master Plan expansion. • Currently the largest single generator of parking at the VVMC is Patient Care and Intensive Care, the areas of the hospital that includes most patient beds. The code requires one parking space for each bed (44 spaces) and an additional 106 parking space for the 15,894SF of space, a total of 160 spaces. The employee -based formula would require one space for each bed (44 parking spaces) and one space per typical day -shift employees (38 spaces) for a total of 82 spaces. This difference of 78 spaces is significant. • The town code applies a requirement of one space for every 150SF for the gift shop and pharmacy, or 10 spaces. The vast majority of patrons to these uses are patients and guest to the hospital and clinics, users that are accounted for in other parking calculations. The employee -based formula would require 5 spaces, or one for each day - shift employee. The discrepancy described above will be exacerbated with build -out of the Master Plan. This is because one of the main features of the master plan is the "de- compression" of spaces for many of the key uses throughout the hospital. In essence, de- compression is the expansion of spaces or uses to improve patient services and hospital operations while not significantly increasing capacity or intensity of the use. The considerations outlined above demonstrate the flaws of the Town's square footage based parking formula. When applying the employee -based formula to the existing Center, the required parking is very close to the actual parking conditions. This would suggest that the employee -based formula to be a very good indicator of required parking. It is for these reasons that the employee -based formula is recommended for VVMC. Parking Requirements of Master Plan Expansions Estimating the parking requirement for expansions contemplated by the Master Plan have been done using Method 2, the employee -based approach. It should be noted that this estimate is based on "master plan" level information, i.e. conceptual plans for VVMC. Expansion plans will be refined in the future and as such the parking estimate should be considered conceptual in nature. That said, the numbers below are considered a good estimate of future parking need. The two changes that will increase parking demand after completion of the master plan expansion will be from an increase of exam rooms from 155 to 197 and an increase of 49 employees. VVMC Parking Analysis Page 11 The parking demands for each of the three considerations were totaled and a multi -use credit (20 %) was applied. This approach indicates a total parking requirement of 699 spaces. The table summarizing this approach is below. VVMC Parking Calculations - MP Buildout 10- May -14 Method 2 - "Employee -Based Formula formula" 1 space per patient bed 1 space per patient exam roo r 1 space per M -F day -shift employees Estimated Parking Requirement Unitsl 58 Spaces 58 Patient Beds Patient Exam Rooms 197 197 I Employees as of May 2014 Employees Dietary 15 15 VMMC 371, 371 VV EM Phy 3 3 Rad ! 1. 1 M5A 4 4 Apollo 10 10 CMM 17 17 Steadman Clinic 98 98 V50 ! 10 10 SPRI 35 35 Ambulance Pediatric Estimate of new employees after MP buildout Employee total 3 3 2 2 49 49 6181 618.0 Sub-total 873.0 Multi -Use Credit 20% reduction Total Required Parking Y. 104,6 698:4 VVMC Parking Analysis Page 12 Conceptual Plan for how VVMC can satisfy parking requirements The following provides a brief summary of how the Master Plan parking demand of 699 spaces can be met. On -Site Parkine Solution /Emnlovee Based Formula (699 spaces +/ -64 surface parking +/ -100 employees who use buses passes and shuttle vans +/ -213 new east parking structure +/ -197 new west structure +/ -70 US Bank Building +/-55 Combination of valet, compact spaces, management programs +/ -699 VVMC Parking Analysis Page 13 Executive Summary Onl The complete Traffic Impact Study is available upon request Prepared For: Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan 1-70 South Frontage Road, Just west of the main Vail interchange Vail, Colorado AE4'sr G U 37990 c7 n September 30, 2014 2533 West Pinyon Ave ^ r CnKe Grand Junction, CO 81505 rn n 970 - 985 -4001 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction This report documents the traffic impact study (TIS) for the proposed Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan (Project) in the Town of Vail (TOV), Colorado. The VVMC is located on the south side of the 1 -70 South Frontage Road (Frontage Road) about 750 feet west of the main Vail interchange. The VVMC also has access to West Meadow Drive. See Figure 1 for the Project Vicinity Map. All land use details listed in this TIS are based on the VVMC Master Plan effort, and will be updated as the Project concept is refined. Another key assumption is a future roundabout on the Frontage Road, which would provide optimal access to each of the three adjacent properties when this area builds out. The TOV has recently been working with adjacent property owners to evaluate alternative roundabout locations and to define the preferred location for this roundabout. This TIS assumed a roundabout configuration, but the roundabout solution is dependent upon the participation of all three property owners, and is based on the assumption that each of the properties will be redeveloped at the same time. Since the timing of these projects may not occur simultaneously, VVMC evaluated Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over - designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated access options that do not include a roundabout. This TIS will be updated as necessary and resubmitted for the TOV Condition Use Permit (CUP) and Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) access permit processes. 1.2 Study Area The Study Area includes the intersections listed below, which are shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the lane geometry and traffic control. Intar¢artinn¢ #1 Frontage Road and Evergreen Access (South Leg) (Proposed intersection west of VVMC Access — assumed to be a roundabout) #2 Frontage Road and VVMC Access (South Leg) / TOV Access (North Leg) #3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive � , TurKey - - 1 - Page 1 �I "�_ co! nsultin , Ltc WMC Master Plan TIS The Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection was added to the Study Area because the WMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction. The increase in VVMC trips at this intersection will occur because the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. The south roundabout at the Main Vail Interchange was not included in the Study Area. The 2025 Vail Transportation Plan (Vail TMP) concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at this interchange, and discussed other system -wide improvements that would help alleviate congestion at the Main Vail Interchange. 1.3 Traffic Analysis Periods and Years The traffic analysis was conducted for the periods and conditions listed below. The traffic volumes used in the analysis are based on traffic data from the peak summer and winter seasons. In addition, traffic volumes from the Vail TMP were used for the Frontage Road. Periods • Weekday AM Peak Hour • Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions • Year 2015 • Year 2016 • Year 2017 • Year 2018 • Year 2035 West End (During Construction) West End (Construction Completed) East End (During Construction) East End (Construction Completed) Build -out (20 -year horizon) Definitions: West End improvements include approximately 40,000 SF of medical space on and around the existing West Wing of the WMC. East End improvements include approximately 25,000 SF of net new medical space and an expanded parking structure at the east end of the Campus. 1.4 Background Traffic Assumptions Related to Adjacent Development The future traffic volumes used in this study assume the following: • WMC build out • Evergreen Site redevelopment, per previous traffic study for this site • No changes to the Town of Vail municipal site 1.5 Existing and Proposed Project Uses Table 1 shows the existing and proposed Project uses for each condition. Table 2 shows the number of employee and guest /patron parking spaces for each condition. L1!r1 Key Page 2 -- -�I "�_ co! nsultin , LLG WMC Master Plan TIS Table 1- Existing and Proposed Project Uses Condition Year Gross Bldg Full -time Employees Patient Exam Rooms Condition Year Area (SF) (FTE) Beds Frontage Road Existing 2014 202,000 569 58 155 West End 2015 202,000 569 58 160 (During Const) West End 2016 242,000 590 58 190 ( Const Completed) 107 116 245 46 291 East End 2017 242,000 590 58 190 (During Const 66 195 96 291 204 East End 2018 268,000 610 58 197 ( Const Completed) Build -out Prior to 300,0001 700 58 2601 245 2035 291 254 153 407 Const Com leted Overall Increase 49% 23% 0% 68% (Existing to Build -out) 2017 321 153' 185' Notes: SF — square footage 1. The SF and exam rooms shown for the Build -out Condition are speculative in nature. Estimates are provided for long -range traffic planning purposes only Table 2 - Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces Note: the number of parking spaces were estimated based on schematic designs for the Master Plan effort; the final parking numbers are subject to change as more detailed design work is completed. # Parking Spaces Accessed via Total Condition Year # Parking Spaces West Meadow Drive Frontage Road Emp P / G Total Emp P / G I Total Emp I P / G Total Existing 2014 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 West End 2015 9 57 66 195 96 291 204 153 357 (During Const West End 2016 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 Const Com leted East End 2017 321 153' 185' 02 0 0 32 153 185 (During Const) East 2018 53 0 5 404 210 614 409 210 619 (Const Ended) Build -out Prior to 5 3 0 5 435 260 695 440 260 700 2035 Overall Increase 73% 70% 72% (Existing to Build -out Notes: Emp — Employee, P / G — Patron / Guest 1. Includes 69 parking spaces (46 = P / G, 23 = Emp) at the US Bank Building that will be accessed from West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. 2. During the East End Construction, the VVMC will "replace" 245 parking spaces by leasing parking spaces at nearby parking structures, and /or increasing transit and shuttle use by employees. 3. These 5 parking spaces are for service vehicles ,�, Tur1 Key Page 3 -- -�I ` _ co! nsult n , LLC WMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Evergreen Existing WMC Main Access (to be relocated to In #2) - El- m NTA 1T1 P7:7rf 1567.7 on N _ Vail Road and Meadow Dr tint #37 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Vicinity Map !p� t, c Vail Rd II Figure 1 �, Tgr1 Key Page 4 -- -�I "�— co! nsumng, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS 1 2 Not To Scale Exact location and �+}► geometry of the T Proposed Intersection not know at this point; ~ yellow shape represents the area studied by FHU 0 1, J0.O TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 1." 800 F rootage Rd vvMc 3 ►ti,yead - ow ; T E Meadow Drive M 3 Pod / TronsR only �1 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Control 2 - TumKipy_ Page 5 Cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1.6 Summary of Traffic Analysis Results The following sections summarize the traffic analysis results at the three Study Area intersections. 1.6.1 Intersection #1 on Frontage Road - Assumed Roundabout The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions of all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over - designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the completion of of the VVMC Master Plan, which is anticipated to be year 2018. Table 3 shows the level of service (LOS), delay, and queuing results of the roundabout analysis based on the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology. - TumKey_ Page 6 Cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Table 3 — Int #1 - Assumed Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 20181 Roundabout AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue Approach LOS — Delay sec ft sec ft (ft) (sec) (ft) West Leg A-5 20 A-9 70 (Frontage Road) C — 16 30 C — 19 50 East Leg A-6 50 A-6 50 (Frontage Road) und Right -turn A-4 55 South Leg A-6 20 A-9 20 (Evergreen Lodge Access) nd North Leg A-6 20 A-6 20 TOV Service Access A-5 95 B — 13 120 Overall Roundabout A — 6 50 (max) A — 7 70 (max) (all vehicles) Table 3 shows that the Proposed Roundabout will operate at LOS A with minimal queuing in year 2018, the anticipated opening year of the WMC Master Plan. Refer to the FHU memo in the Appendix for the year 2035 Build -out analysis results. 1.6.2 WMC Access I TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. Table 4 shows that the "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the WMC Access and TOV Access thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. Table 4 — WMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] VVMC Access is RIRO. TOV Access is % (Left -turn IN arohibited) Turn �{eY Page 7 Co! nsulvnr ,_L L C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour n Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) und Shared Left- C — 16 30 C — 19 50 ss) I and Right -Turn und Right -turn A-4 55 A — 10 105 ess) nd odge U -turn A-5 95 B — 13 120 Turn �{eY Page 7 Co! nsulvnr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 5 shows that the RIRO configuration at the VVMC and TOV Accesses on the Frontage Road will operate at LOS A in the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. Table 5 - WMC /TOV Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TO Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Proaosed Roundabout) 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four -way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue ft sec (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Northbound Right -turn A-3 45 A-8 95 (VVMC Access) (West Meadow Drive) Southbound Right -turn A-4 35 A-5 50 (TOV Access) Northbound A-8 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four -way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] �, TgmKey Page 8 J -- � I "�_ Co! nsultin , LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS —Delay 95th % Queue sec ft sec ft Eastbound A-7 50 B — 10 95 (West Meadow Drive) Westbound A — 10 55 A-9 65 (East Meadow Drive) Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 90 (Vail Road) Southbound A — 10 115 B — 11 100 (Vail Road) Overall Intersection A-9 115 (ma__7B — 11 100 (max) (all vehicles) �, TgmKey Page 8 J -- � I "�_ Co! nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 6 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End Construction). However, the traffic data obtained in February 2014 showed that the peak hour trips to /from the US Bank Building were 36 vph (AM) and 43 (PM). Based on the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection (AM = 316 vph, PM = 518 vph), the increase in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive to /from the US Bank Building during the East End Constructions is only 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM). VVMC Trips on West Meadow Drive after the VVMC Master Plan is Completed After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 -1,400 vehicles per day (1,000 = summer season, 1,400 = winter season) to 58 vehicles per day (service and delivery vehicles only). The 58 vehicles per day on West Meadow Drive is 29 services and delivery vehicles that make 29 trips IN and 29 trips OUT for a total of 58 daily trips. The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. 1.7 Conclusions and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 1.7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the � , TurKey - - 1 - Page 9 �I "�— Co! nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over - designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. 1.7.2 VVMC Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. The "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access (RIRO) and TOV Access (3/4 movement) thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. 1.7.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction due to the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building being accesses via West Meadow Drive. However, the increase in traffic at this intersection will only be 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM), and there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at this intersection. No changes are recommended at this intersection. TurnKey Page 10 Cog, LLC Traffic Impact Study Prepared For: Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan I -70 South Frontage Road, just west of the main Vail interchange Vail, Colorado September 30, 2014 2533 West Pinyon Ave ^ r CnKe Grand Junction, CO 81505 rn n 970 - 985 -4001 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................... ............................... 1 LISTOF FIGURES .................................................................................. ............................... 2 LISTOF TABLES .................................................................................... ............................... 2 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................. ............................... 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ ............................... 3 1.2 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................... ............................... 3 1.3 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PERIODS AND YEARS ..................................................................................... ..............................4 1.4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ASSUMPTIONS RELATED TO ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT ......................... ..............................4 1.5 EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROJECT USES ..................................................................................... ..............................4 1.6 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS ................................................................................ ............................... 8 1.7 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................. .............................11 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA ............................................... ............................... 13 2.1 VVMC ACCESSES ....................................................................................................................... .............................13 2.2 OTHER TRAFFIC COUNT LOCATIONS ......................................................................................... ............................... 13 2.3 PEAK HOUR DETERMINATION: VVMC TRAFFIC VS FRONTAGE ROAD TRAFFIC .......................... .............................15 2.4 VVMC WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VS WEEKEND PEAK HOUR ......................................................... .............................16 3 PROJECT TRIPS ........................................................................... ............................... 16 3.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ........................................................................................................ .............................16 3.2 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ...................................................................................................... .............................18 4 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................ ............................... 26 4.1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES .............................................................................................. .............................26 4.2 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (BACKGROUND + PROJECT) .............................................................. .............................29 5 TURN LANE WARRANTS AT VVMC ACCESS TO FRONTAGE ROAD ...................... 35 6 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS .............................................. ............................... 35 6.1 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION #1] ........................................... .............................35 6.2 VVMC ACCESS/ TOV ACCESS ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION # 2] .................................. .............................38 6.3 VAIL ROAD AND MEADOW DRIVE [INTERSECTION # 3] ................................................................ .............................40 7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. ............................... 42 7.1 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION #1] ........................................... .............................42 7.2 VVMC ACCESS/ TOV ACCESS ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION # 2] .................................. .............................43 7.3 VAIL ROAD AND MEADOW DRIVE [INTERSECTION # 3] ................................................................ .............................43 APPENDIX ,�TurnKe�y Page 1 "�— Co! nsultin LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS List of Tables Table 1 — List of Figures 5 Figure1 — Vicinity Map ............................................................................ ............................... 6 Figure 2 — Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Control ........................... ............................... 7 Figure 3 — Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Count Volumes ....................... ............................... 14 Figure 4 — Project Trip Distribution (AM Peak Hour) .............................. ............................... 19 Figure 5 — Project Trip Distribution (PM Peak Hour) .............................. ............................... 20 Figure 6 — Project Trip Assignment (West End — During Construction) . ............................... 21 Figure 7 — Project Trip Assignment (West End — Construction Completed ) .......................... 22 Figure 8 — Project Trip Assignment (East End — During Construction) .. ............................... 23 Figure 9 — Project Trip Assignment (East End — Construction Completed ) ........................... 24 Figure 10 — Project Trip Assignment (Build -out) .................................... ............................... 25 Figure 11 — Adjusted Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................. ............................... 27 Figure 12 —Year 2015 Total Traffic Volumes (West End — During Construction) ................. 30 Figure 13 — Year 2016 Total Traffic Volumes (West End — Construction Completed) .......... 31 Figure 14 — Year 2017 Total Traffic Volumes (East End — During Construction) .................. 32 Figure 15 — Year 2018 Total Traffic Volumes (East End — Construction Completed) ........... 33 Figure 16 — Year 2035 Total Traffic Volumes (Build -out) ....................... ............................... 34 List of Tables Table 1 — Existing and Proposed Project Uses ........................................ ............................... 5 Table 2 — Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces ................................... ............................... 5 Table 3 — Proposed Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] .............. ............................... 9 Table 4 — VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] ........ ............................... 9 Table 5 — WMC /TOV Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] .................. 10 Table 6 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] .. ............................... 10 Table 7 — Summary of Traffic Counts at VVMC Accesses ..................... ............................... 13 Table 8 — Peak Hour Comparison .......................................................... ............................... 15 Table 9 — Year 2014 Winter Traffic Count at VVMC Accesses by Group ............................. 16 Table 10 — VVMC Trip Generation Summary ........................................ ............................... 18 Table 11 — VVMC Trip Distribution Summary ........................................ ............................... 18 Table 12 — Compare Frontage Road Traffic Volumes ........................... ............................... 26 Table 13 — Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Rd ........ ............................... 35 Table 14 — Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] ........................... ............................... 37 Table 15 — Roundabout Analysis: Compare Various Methodologies ..... ............................... 37 Table 16 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2014] ......................... 38 Table 17 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2018] ......................... 39 Table 18 — VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] .... ............................... 40 Table 19 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] ......................... 40 Table 20 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2014] ............................... 41 Table 21 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] ............................... 42 TurnKe�y Page 2 -- � I ` _ co! nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction This report documents the traffic impact study (TIS) for the proposed Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan (Project) in the Town of Vail (TOV), Colorado. The VVMC is located on the south side of the 1 -70 South Frontage Road (Frontage Road) about 750 feet west of the main Vail interchange. The VVMC also has access to West Meadow Drive. See Figure 1 for the Project Vicinity Map. All land use details listed in this TIS are based on the VVMC Master Plan effort, and will be updated as the Project concept is refined. Another key assumption is a future roundabout on the Frontage Road, which would provide optimal access to each of the three adjacent properties when this area builds out. The TOV has recently been working with adjacent property owners to evaluate alternative roundabout locations and to define the preferred location for this roundabout. This TIS assumed a roundabout configuration, but the roundabout solution is dependent upon the participation of all three property owners, and is based on the assumption that each of the properties will be redeveloped at the same time. Since the timing of these projects may not occur simultaneously, VVMC evaluated Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over - designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated access options that do not include a roundabout. This TIS will be updated as necessary and resubmitted for the TOV Condition Use Permit (CUP) and Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) access permit processes. 1.2 Study Area The Study Area includes the intersections listed below, which are shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the lane geometry and traffic control. Intar¢artinn¢ #1 Frontage Road and Evergreen Access (South Leg) (Proposed Roundabout west of VVMC Access) #2 Frontage Road and VVMC Access (South Leg) / TOV Access (North Leg) #3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive �, Tur1 Key Page 3 -- -�I ` _ co! nsultin , Ltc WMC Master Plan TIS The Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection was added to the Study Area because the WMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction. The increase in VVMC trips at this intersection will occur because the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. The south roundabout at the Main Vail Interchange was not included in the Study Area. The 2025 Vail Transportation Plan (Vail TMP) concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at this interchange, and discussed other system -wide improvements that would help alleviate congestion at the Main Vail Interchange. 1.3 Traffic Analysis Periods and Years The traffic analysis was conducted for the periods and conditions listed below. The traffic volumes used in the analysis are based on traffic data from the peak summer and winter seasons. In addition, traffic volumes from the Vail TMP were used for the Frontage Road. Periods • Weekday AM Peak Hour • Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions • Year 2015 • Year 2016 • Year 2017 • Year 2018 • Year 2035 West End (During Construction) West End (Construction Completed) East End (During Construction) East End (Construction Completed) Build -out (20 -year horizon) Definitions: West End improvements include approximately 40,000 SF of medical space on and around the existing West Wing of the WMC. East End improvements include approximately 25,000 SF of net new medical space and an expanded parking structure at the east end of the Campus. 1.4 Background Traffic Assumptions Related to Adjacent Development The future traffic volumes used in this study assume the following: • WMC build out • Evergreen Site redevelopment, per previous traffic study for this site • No changes to the TOV municipal site 1.5 Existing and Proposed Project Uses Table 1 shows the existing and proposed Project uses for each condition. Table 2 shows the number of employee and guest /patron parking spaces for each condition. L1!r1 Key Page 4 -- -�I "�_ co! nsultin , LLG WMC Master Plan TIS Table 1- Existing and Proposed Project Uses Condition Year Gross Bldg Full -time Employees Patient Exam Rooms Condition Year Area (SF) (FTE) Beds Frontage Road Existing 2014 202,000 569 58 155 West End 2015 202,000 569 58 160 (During Const) West End 2016 242,000 590 58 190 ( Const Completed) 107 116 245 46 291 East End 2017 242,000 590 58 190 (During Const 66 195 96 291 204 East End 2018 268,000 610 58 197 ( Const Completed) Build -out Prior to 300,0001 700 58 2601 245 2035 291 254 153 407 Const Com leted Overall Increase 49% 23% 0% 68% (Existing to Build -out) 2017 321 153' 185' Notes: SF — square footage 1. The SF and exam rooms shown for the Build -out Condition are speculative in nature. Estimates are provided for long -range traffic planning purposes only Table 2 - Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces Note: the number of parking spaces were estimated based on schematic designs for the Master Plan effort; the final parking numbers are subject to change as more detailed design work is completed. # Parking Spaces Accessed via Total Condition Year # Parking Spaces West Meadow Drive Frontage Road Emp P / G Total Emp P / G I Total Emp I P / G Total Existing 2014 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 West End 2015 9 57 66 195 96 291 204 153 357 (During Const West End 2016 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 Const Com leted East End 2017 321 153' 185' 02 0 0 32 153 185 (During Const) East 2018 53 0 5 404 210 614 409 210 619 (Const Ended) Build -out Prior to 5 3 0 5 435 260 695 440 260 700 2035 Overall Increase 73% 70% 72% (Existing to Build -out Notes: Emp — Employee, P / G — Patron / Guest 1. Includes 69 parking spaces (46 = P / G, 23 = Emp) at the US Bank Building that will be accessed from West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. 2. During the East End Construction the WMC will "replace" 245 parking spaces by leasing parking spaces at nearby parking structures, and /or increasing transit and shuttle use by employees. 3. These 5 parking spaces are for service vehicles ,�, Tur1 Key Page 5 -- -�I ` _ co! nsult n , LLC WMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Evergreen Existing WMC Main Access (to be relocated to In #2) E-1- m NTA 1T1 P7:7rf 1567.7 on Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Vicinity Map y 5 C. Ir N _ Vail Road and Meadow Dr tint #37 Vail Rd II Figure 1 �, Tgr1 Key Page 6 -- -�I "�— co! nsumng, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS 1 2 Not To Scale Exact location and �+}► geometry of the T Proposed Roundabout not know at this point; ~ yellow shape represents the area studied by FHU 0 1, J0.O TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 1." 800 F rootage Rd vvMc 3 ►ti,yead - ow T E Meadow Drive M 3 Pod / TronsR only �1 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Control 2 - TumKipy_ Page 7 Cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1.6 Summary of Traffic Analysis Results The following sections summarize the traffic analysis results at the three Study Area intersections. 1.6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions of all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over - designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the completion of of the VVMC Master Plan, which is anticipated to be year 2018. Table 3 shows the level of service (LOS), delay, and queuing results of the roundabout analysis based on the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology. `TumKej/ Page 8 Cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Table 3 - Proposed Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] Roundabout AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue Approach LOS — Delay T sec ft sec ft (ft) (sec) (ft) West Leg A-5 20 A-9 70 (Frontage Road) C — 16 30 C — 19 50 East Leg A-6 50 A-6 50 (Frontage Road) Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 South Leg A-6 20 A-9 20 (Evergreen Lodge Access) Westbound North Leg A-6 20 A-6 20 TOV Service Access A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access Overall Roundabout A - 6 50 (max) A - 7 70 (max) (all vehicles) Table 3 shows that the Proposed Roundabout will operate at LOS A with minimal queuing in year 2018, the anticipated opening year of the WMC Master Plan. Refer to the FHU memo in the Appendix for the year 2035 Build -out analysis results. 1.6.2 WMC Access I TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. Table 4 shows that the "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the WMC Access and TOV Access thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. Table 4 - WMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] VVMC Access is RIRO. TOV Access is % (Left -turn IN arohibited) Turn �{eY Page 9 co! nsulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay T 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Southbound Shared Left- C — 16 30 C — 19 50 (TOVAccess) and Right -Turn Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 A — 10 105 (VVMC Access) Westbound (Evergreen Lodge U -turn A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access Turn �{eY Page 9 co! nsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 5 shows that the RIRO configuration at the VVMC and TOV Accesses on the Frontage Road will operate at LOS A in the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. Table 5 - WMC /TOV Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TO Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Proaosed Roundabout) 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four -way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue ft sec (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Northbound Right -turn A-3 45 A-8 95 (VVMC Access) (West Meadow Drive) Southbound Right -turn A-4 35 A-5 50 (TOV Access) Northbound A-8 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four -way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] �, TgmKey Page 10 J - - �I "�_ Co! nsultin , LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS —Delay 95th % Queue sec ft sec ft Eastbound A-7 50 B — 10 95 (West Meadow Drive) Westbound A — 10 55 A-9 65 (East Meadow Drive) Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 90 (Vail Road) Southbound A — 10 115 B — 11 100 (Vail Road) Overall Intersection A-9 115 (ma__7B — 11 100 (max) (all vehicles) �, TgmKey Page 10 J - - �I "�_ Co! nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 6 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End Construction). However, the traffic data obtained in February 2014 showed that the peak hour trips to /from the US Bank Building were 36 vph (AM) and 43 (PM). Based on the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection (AM = 316 vph, PM = 518 vph), the increase in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive to /from the US Bank Building during the East End Constructions is only 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM). VVMC Trips on West Meadow Drive after the VVMC Master Plan is Completed After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 -1,400 vehicles per day (1,000 = summer season, 1,400 = winter season) to 58 vehicles per day (service and delivery vehicles only). The 58 vehicles per day on West Meadow Drive is 29 services and delivery vehicles that make 29 trips IN and 29 trips OUT for a total of 58 daily trips. The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. 1.7 Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 1.7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the �, ----------------------------- K Page 11 J �I "�— Co! nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over - designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. 1.7.2 VVMC Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. The "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access (RIRO) and TOV Access (3/4 movement) thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. 1.7.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction due to the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building being accesses via West Meadow Drive. However, the increase in traffic at this intersection will only be 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM), and there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at this intersection. No changes are recommended at this intersection. �L11'17{$jI Page 12 Cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 2 Existing Traffic Count Data 2.1 VVMC Accesses Traffic counts were conducted at the VVMC Accesses on the dates and times listed in Table 7. Table 7 also shows a comparison of the summer and winter traffic counts. Table 7 — Summary of Traffic Counts at WMC Accesses Season Date AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Time Traffic Volumes (vph) Time Traffic Volumes (vph) IN OUT Total IN OUT Total Summer' Wednesday, August 21, 2013 Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:30 -7:30 am 160 29 189 4:00 -5:00 pm 62 94 156 Winter Tuesday, February 4, 2014 6:45 -7:45 am 167 36 203 3:30 -4:30 pm 108 109 217 % Difference (Summer is % lower than Winter) 7% 28% Notes: vph — vehicles per hour 1. The peak hour data shown is for highest peak hours of the two days that were counted Table 7 shows that the winter season peak hour traffic volumes were higher than the summer season. Therefore, the traffic data collected on February 4, 2014 was used for this TIS. 2.2 Other Traffic Count Locations In addition to counting the traffic IN and OUT at the VVMC Accesses, the movements and intersection listed below were also counted. Figure 3 shows the existing year 2014 peak hour traffic volumes at these locations. The Appendix contains the peak hour traffic count data at all locations. • Frontage Road thru movements at the VVMC Access • Traffic IN and OUT at the TOV Access • Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection �, Tgr1 Key Page 13 J -- -�I "�— co! nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS ii Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Evergreen Lodge Access \O ` 1 TOV West Access VVMC 20 ` 76 i , `► 44 71 11 18 16 15 This intersection was counted to determine the overall trips to /from VVMC, but was not included in the intersection analysis. 0 TOV Main Access 2 I -70 $00 F rootage Rd � fead /�2�8 Oly 3 3 0 L 4 0 12 Lj L_ 4 7 10 10 18 9 01 2 2 4 60 2 151 2 3 5\ 2 j 5 I L 13 39 193 2� � 5 359 11� 84 9 3V 26 2 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Count Volumes Main Vail 0 265 274 E Meadow Drive 3 Ped /Transit Only Figure 3 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 14 Co! nsultinr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 2.3 Peak Hour Determination: VVMC Traffic vs Frontage Road Traffic The AM and PM peak hours for the VVMC traffic and the Frontage Road thru traffic were calculated separately to see if had the same peak hour. Table 8 shows a comparison of the peak hours. The Appendix contains more detailed peak hour calculations. Table 8 — Peak Hour Comparison Time Peak Period Traffic Volumes vehicles per hour (vph) VVMC Traffic All Accesses 1 -70 South Frontage Road At VVMC Access IN OUT Total WB Thru EB Thru Total AM Peak Period 6:30 -7:30 am 149 28 177 117 72 189 7. 1 136 79 215 7:00 -8:Tam 154 36 190 180 110 290 7:15 -8: 1 150 42 1 192 1 235 151 386 7:30-8:30 am 140 42 182 265 193 458 PM Peak Period 3:00 -4:00 98 84 182 249 315 564 3:15 -4:15 102 1 1 • 3:45 -4:45 94 11 11 • 86 jpm 97 115 121 199 209 207 270 278 278 340 350 351 610 628 629 4:15 -5:15 79 123 202 279 341 620 4:30 -5:30 pm 65 127 192 267 320 587 4:45 -5:45 pm 63 143 206 246 294 540 5:00 -6.00 pm 66 143 209 223 272 495 Table 8 shows that the peak hours for the VVMC traffic and Frontage Road traffic are different. Below are observations about each peak period. AM Peak Hour The VVMC and Frontage Road peak hours only overlap by 15 minutes. VVMC traffic during the Frontage Road peak hour is 10% lower than during the VVMC peak hour (203 vph vs 182 vph). Frontage Road traffic during the VVMC peak hour is 53% lower than during the Frontage Road peak hour (458 vph vs 215 vph). Because the Frontage Road traffic is so much lower during the VVMC peak hour (458 vph vs 215 vph), the traffic volumes during the Frontage Road peak hour were used for the AM peak hour. ' �r X117 eY Page 15 \` -____ cons ulting, L t e VVMC Master Plan TIS PM Peak Hour The WMC and Frontage Road peak hours overlap by 30 minutes. WMC traffic during the Frontage Road peak hour is 5% lower than during the WMC peak hour (217 vph vs 207 vph). Frontage Road traffic during the VVMC peak hour is 0.8% lower than during the Frontage Road peak hour (633 vph vs 628 vph). Because the Frontage Road peak hour is essentially the same during the WMC peak hour (633 vph vs 628 vph), the traffic volumes during the VVMC peak hour were used for the PM peak hour. 2.4 WMC Weekday Peak Hour vs Weekend Peak Hour The traffic volumes discussed in Sections 2.1 -2.3 were collected during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The weekday represents the peak for the VVMC because the WMC operates at full capacity with all clinics open on weekdays. On the weekend, the WMC has significantly less trips because the clinics are closed and WMC operates with reduced and staff and doctors. 3 Project Trips 3.1 Project Trip Generation The Project trip generation is based on the existing winter season traffic counts at the WMC Accesses and the existing and future WMC land use and parking spaces. Table 9 summarizes the existing traffic counts at the VVMC Accesses by group — employees and guests / patrons. Table 9 — Year 2014 Winter Traffic Count at WMC Accesses by Group Peak Hour Main Access (W Meadow Dr) Service Access (W Meadow Dr) Employee Access (Frontage Road) US Bank Bldg Access (Frontage Road Total IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT Guest / Patron Trips AM 44 20 - -- - -- - -- - -- 5 0 49 20 PM 71 76 - -- - -- - -- - -- 5 2 76 78 Employee Trips AM - -- - -- 1 1 61 19 29 2 91 22 PM - -- - -- 2 2 5 18 25 11 32 31 The steps listed below were used to calculate the VVMC trip generation for each condition. The trip generation for Guests / Patrons and Employees were calculated separately, and then combined at the last step. The Appendix contains the detailed trip generation calculations. Guest / Patron Trip Generation Calculations Step #1 Calculated the percent change in Patient Beds, Exam Rooms, and Guest / Patron Parking Spaces from one condition to the next. TurnKey Page 16 Cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS The Patient Beds did not change for any condition so it was disregarded. Due to the limited Parking Spaces at the VVMC, the trip generation is more dependent upon the availability of Parking Spaces than the increase in Exam Rooms. Therefore, the percent change in trip generation for each condition was directly correlated to the percent change in Guest / Patron Parking Spaces. Step #2 Increased the trips to /from the VVMC by the percent change in Parking Spaces from Step #1. Step #3 Allocated the trips to /from the VVMC for each condition based on the percent of parking spaces accessed via West Meadows Drive or Frontage Road. Employee Trip Generation Calculations Step #1 Calculated the percent change in FTE's and Employee Parking Spaces from one condition to the next. Due to the limited Employee Parking Spaces at the VVMC (some employees have to park off -site now), the Employee trip generation is dependent upon the availability of Employee Parking Spaces, and not the increase in FTE's. Therefore, the percent change in trip generation for each condition was directly correlated to the percent change in Employee Parking Spaces. Step #2 Increased /decreased the trips to /from the VVMC by the percent change in Parking Spaces from Step #1. Step #3 Allocated the trips to /from the VVMC for each condition based on the percent of parking spaces accessed via West Meadows Drive or Frontage Road Combine Guest / Patron and Employee Trips Step #4 The number of Patron / Guest and Employee trips were combined to get the total trips to /from the VVMC on West Meadow Drive, and Frontage Road for each condition. Table 10 shows a summary of the VVMC trip generation. The "Trip Generation Calculations" table in the Appendix shows the detailed trip generation calculations. �, TgmKey Page 17 J -- -�I ` — co! nsultin , LLG WMC Master Plan TIS Table 10 — WMC Trip Generation Summary 3.2 Project Trip Distribution The Project Trip Distribution was based on the existing traffic counts at 1) the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road, and 2) Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection. Table 11 shows the trip distribution percentages at these two locations. The Project Trip Distribution is the same in all conditions. Table 11— WMC Trip Distribution Summary Trip Distribution for VVMC Trips WMC Peak Hour Trips (vph) West Meadow Drive Frontage Road Condition Year AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr EAM Pk Hr P M Pk Hr To the West (NB LT) From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) I N Out Tot I N Out Tot 100% ut I Tot I N I Out I Tot Existing 2014 45 21 66 73 78 151 95 21 116 35 31 66 West End 2015 21 8 29 29 30 59 101 30 131 73 73 146 (During Const) West End 2016 37 15 52 54 56 110 103 27 130 54 53 107 ( Const Completed) East End 2017 60 23 83 80 82 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 (During Const) East End 2018 2 0 2 1 1 2 212 62 274 155 156 311 ( Const Completed) Build -out Prior to 2 0 2 1 1 2 239 72 311 183 186 369 2035 3.2 Project Trip Distribution The Project Trip Distribution was based on the existing traffic counts at 1) the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road, and 2) Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection. Table 11 shows the trip distribution percentages at these two locations. The Project Trip Distribution is the same in all conditions. Table 11— WMC Trip Distribution Summary Figures 4 (AM Peak) and 5 (PM Peak Hour) show the Project Trip Distribution. Figures 6 thru 10 show the Project Trip Assignment. �, TgmKey Page 18 J -- -�I "�— Co! nsultin , LLC Trip Distribution for VVMC Trips Frontage Road West Meadow Drive Peak Hour Inbound Trips Outbound Trips Inbound Trips Outbound Trips From the East (WB LT) From the West (EB RT) To the East I (NB RT) To the West (NB LT) From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) To the South (EB RT) AM 90% 10% 85% 15% 100% 0% 90% 10% PM 75% 25% 95% 5% 95% 5% 95% 5% Figures 4 (AM Peak) and 5 (PM Peak Hour) show the Project Trip Distribution. Figures 6 thru 10 show the Project Trip Assignment. �, TgmKey Page 18 J -- -�I "�— Co! nsultin , LLC WMC Master Plan TIS X = Inbound Traffic % Y = Outbound Traffic % Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Distribution - AM Peak Hour (Same for all Conditions) I 4 TL1!�"1 -Key Page 19 - - - �I "�— Co! nsultin , LLC WMC Master Plan TIS X = Inbound Traffic % Y = Outbound Traffic % 0% 5% 50/( l 0% Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Distribution - PM Peak Hour (Same for all Conditions) I 5 �L11'17{$jI Page 20 Cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (West End - During Construction) I 6 �, TgmKey Page 21 -- � I "�— Co! nsuivn , LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (West End - Construction Completed) I 7 - TurnKey Page 22 Cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (East End - During Construction) I 8 , TurnKey Page 23 Cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (East End - Construction Completed) I 9 �TL111 Key Page 24 �7 Cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (Build -out) I 10 �TL111 Key Page 25 �7 Cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS 4 Existing and Future Traffic Volumes The following sections describe the existing, future background, and total traffic volumes. The Appendix contains tables that show the traffic volumes at the Study Area intersections. 4.1 Background Traffic Volumes 4.1.1 Frontage Road Traffic Volumes 4.1.1.1 Existing Year 2014 The existing year 2014 Frontage Road traffic volumes are based on the traffic counts conducted in February 2014. The Frontage Road traffic volumes from the February 2014 traffic count were compared to the traffic volumes from 1) the 2009 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Vail TMP), 2) the Vail MOB TIS prepared in November 2012 by Turn Key Consulting, and 3) the MOB and Municipal Center Roundabout Analysis memo prepared in October 2012 by FHU. Table 12 shows the traffic volume comparison. Table 12 — Compare Frontage Road Traffic Volumes Peak Year 2006 Year 2014 Year 2014 Year 2025 Year 2032 Hour Direction (Vail TMP) (Calculated) (traffic count (Vail TMP) (TOV Info) (Note 1) in Feb 2014) E B 395 475 193 605 AM Not included in WB 585 704 265 880 Vail TMP Total 980 1,178 458 1,485 E B 815 980 359 1,202 1,160 PM WB 600 722 274 992 985 Total 1,415 1,701 633 2,194 2,145 Notes: 1. The year 2014 Frontage Road traffic volumes were calculated using a straight -line growth between the years 2006 and 2025 traffic volumes in the Vail TMP. The annual growth rate (AGR) between years 2006 and 2025 traffic volumes in the Vail TMP was 2.34% per year. Table 12 shows that the year 2014 traffic counts are 62% lower than the year 2014 traffic volumes calculated using the years 2006 and 2035 traffic volumes from the Vail TMP. In addition, the 2014 traffic counts are 54% lower than the year 2006 traffic volumes from the Vail TMP. Because of the significant difference between traffic volume sources, the Frontage Road traffic volumes based on the Vail TMP were used so that this TIS is consistent with the Vail TMP. The traffic volumes in the Vail TMP are based on traffic data "collected over a variety of times including the Christmas holiday, Martin Luther King weekend, Presidents Day weekend, and Spring Break times in 2005 and 2006." (Page 4 of the Vail TMP). Figure 11 shows the adjusted year 2014 traffic volumes. �, Tgr1 Key Page 26 J -- -�I "�_ co! nsult n , LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Evergreen Lodge Access /i,1 1 3 5 1 2 5 13 ��� 2 1 39 423 2 662 475 2� 5 704 920 ~ 652 980 ~ 722 \25 � 47 11� 84 � I 75 9 I 26 16 I 64 3 I 18 4 69 2 29 ` 1 \TOV West Access VVMC 3 143 65 103 \�O 28 88� 1 12 L t 4 7 10 10 3--1 0 18 9 0� I r0 2 4 60 2 151 '� d ft TOV Main Access 2 1 1 -70 South F rontags Rd W Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive I 3 pad / Tren8lt Only Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Adjusted Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 11 �L11'17{$jI Page 27 cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 4.1.1.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018 The 2.34% AGR (refer to Note 1 of Table 12) was applied to the year 2014 traffic volumes from the Vail MOB TIS to calculate the Frontage Road traffic volumes in years 2015 -2018 and 2035. 4.1.1.3 Future Year 2035 FHU, who prepared the Vail TMP, stated in an email to the TOV that a 0.5% AGR could be used to forecast traffic growth from year 2025 to year 2034. The 0.5% AGR was applied to the year 2025 Frontage Road traffic volumes in the Vail TMP to estimate year 2035 Frontage Road traffic volumes. The Appendix contains the email from FHU to the TOV. The 0.5% AGR from 2025 to 2034 has been recommended by FHU and the TOV since the Vail TMP is based on the assumption that Vail will reach build -out by 2025. It has been recommended that after build -out only this modest growth rate be applied. It also should be noted that with the recent economic downturn and slowing of development in Vail, it is unlikely Vail will see build out in 2025 and potentially it will extend beyond 2034. Thus it is likely that the total traffic growth projected for this study is very conservative. 4.1.2 TOV Traffic Volumes (Main Access) 4.1.2.1 Existing Year 2014 The traffic volumes to /from the main access to TOV Municipal Building (TOV Main Access) on the Frontage Road were counted during the February 2014 traffic counts. These traffic volumes were used without any modifications. 4.1.2.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The year 2014 traffic volumes to /from the TOV were assumed to stay the same in all future year scenarios. There have been several proposed projects on the north side of the Frontage Road (including a parking structure for the VVMC) that would significantly increase the traffic volume at the TOV Access. At this point the traffic volumes at the TOV Access do not include any future development on the TOV property. 4.1.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive Traffic Volumes 4.1.3.1 Existing Year 2014 The traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection were counted during the February 2014 traffic counts. This intersection was not included in the Vail TMP so it was not possible to see how the February 2014 traffic counts compared to the Holiday traffic counts in the Vail TMP. Therefore, these traffic volumes were used without any modifications for year 2014. L1!r1 Key Page 28 -- -�I "�_ co! nsultin , LLG VVMC Master Plan TIS 4.1.3.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The background traffic volumes (all movements except those to /from West Meadow Drive) at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection were increase by 0.5% AGR to years 2015 thru 2018 and 2035. The 0.5% AGR is based on the area served by this intersection is already developed, but traffic will still probably see modest growth over time as noted by FHU in the email to the TOV referenced in Section 4.1.1.3. 4.1.4 Evergreen Lodge Traffic Volumes 4.1.4.1 Existing Year 2014 The Evergreen Lodge is located on the south side of the Frontage Road immediately west of the VVMC. If the Proposed Roundabout is constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC / TOV Access, the south leg of the Proposed Roundabout could be the Evergreen Lodge access. Because of this, the traffic volumes to /from the Evergreen Lodge were estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Fox Higgins prepared a traffic study in year 2008 for the proposed redevelopment of the Evergreen Lodge. The Fox Higgins traffic study was based on the Evergreen Lodge expanding from 128 units (128 hotel rooms) to 230 units (139 hotel rooms and 91 condos). Even though the redevelopment has not occurred yet, the year 2014 traffic volumes at the Evergreen Lodge were based on the proposed redevelopment from the Fox Higgins traffic study. The trips to /from the Evergreen Lodge were distributed using the same trip distribution percentages calculated at the VVMC Frontage Road access. The Appendix contains select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study, and the Evergreen Lodge trip generation and distribution calculations. 4.1.4.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The year 2014 traffic volumes to /from the Evergreen Lodge were assumed to stay the same in all future year scenarios. 4.2 Total Traffic Volumes (Background + Project) Total traffic volumes are the sum of project traffic and background traffic. The Appendix contains tables that show the total traffic volumes at the Study Area intersections. Figures 12 thru 16 show the total traffic volumes. �L11'17{$jI Page 29 Cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 1� 2 1 2 433 1� 680 952 671 25 I 75 16 '1 I r64 4 69 1 TOV West Access Evergreen Lodge TOV Main Access Access 2 f VVMC 3 144 /41 104 0 16 47j4 0 78� 4 7 10 10 2� � 0 18 7 0 1 r 0 2 1 60 2 152 '\ 0 ft See Note Below 3 5� 5� 13 2 39 2 5 486 � 720 1003 739 10 91 � 18 55, 5 26 4 69 South Fronts _ go Rd W NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U -turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive 3 a.d / ns I Trait only Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Year 2015 Total Traffic Volumes (West End - During Construction) 12 TurnKey Page 30 Cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 2 444 1� 696 971 687 12� 47 \25 � 75 16 I 64 4 69 1 TOV West Access Evergreen Lodge TOV Main Access Access 2 I VVMC 3 144 /57 104 0 23 704 0 4 7 10 10 0 18 8 0� 1 1 0 2 3 61 2 153 '� 0 ft South Fronta _ 9a Rd W 2 See Note Below 3 5 2 5� '13,' 3k756 497 2� 1026 10� 14 4� 3 I 50 NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U -turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive I 3 pad / TrenSlt Only Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Year 2016 Total Traffic Volumes (West End - Construction Completed) 13 �, ----------------------------- 17 Page 31 J �I \�— Co! nsul nr , LLC WMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 1 1� 2 \�, 446 709 981 702 \25 I 75 16 I 64 4 69 2 See Note \- J Below 3 5 2 5� �13 39 509 2� 5 754 1050 774 VVMC Access �L11'17{$jI Page 32 Cog, LLC TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 1'70 South Pronto 9e Rd vvMc 0 3 h�,yeaa _ 145 80 105 0 �/�ve ' 30 0 8 95� 4 12 4 E Mea dow Drive � L 7 10 10 ~ 18 NOTE 3 Pod / Tronslt only s� 0 This movement will have to make a U- �� turn at the Proposed Roundabout west 0 0 of the VVMC Access when the TOV 4 61 2 153 Access is converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure 14 Year 2017 Total Traffic Volumes (East End - During Construction) �L11'17{$jI Page 32 Cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 479 1� 736 1045 728 12� 47 25 � I 75 16 I 64 4 69 1 TOV West Access Evergreen Lodge TOV Main Access Access 2 I VVMC '� 0 ft 2 See Note Below 3 5 5 X13; 2 3 `r, 5 521 772 1075 792 \39 9 191� � 153 X116; 8 I 148 South Fronta _ 9a Rd W NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U -turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive I 3 ved / Tra ly nsit On Year 2018 Total Traffic Volumes (East End - Construction Completed) Figure 15 �, ----------------------------- 17 Page 33 J �I \�— Co! nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 606 1� 2 920 1263 985 12� � 47 25 � I 75 16 I 64 4 69 O1 TOV West Access !VV TOV Main Access 2 I C 3 159 24 114 \�4 10 22 55� 4 8 11 11 1� � 0 20 6 �Tro 2 67 2 168 '� 0 ft South Fronts _ 9e Rd W See Not �,\A Below 4 7` 10� 22, 3 54 25� 60 644 953 1263 1043 24� 215; 46 � ',137: 11 61 9 177 NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U -turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Year 2035 Total Traffic Volumes (Build -out) Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive 3 vd 1 Trenslt Only Figure 16 TurnKey Page 34 Cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 5 Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Road The need for turn lanes on the Frontage Road at the VVMC Access is based on the requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC). Table 13 shows the required turn lanes per the SHAC. Table 13 — Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Rd Table 13 shows that an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane (EB RT Decel Lane) will be required at the VVMC Access to the Frontage Road. The EB RT Decel Lane was included in the roadway configuration for the traffic analysis discussed in the next section. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations was analyzed at the three Study Area intersections. The following sections describe the analysis and results for each Study Area intersection. 6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC Access was analyzed using the FHWA Roundabout Methodology, which utilizes the methods and calculations in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). In addition to the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, the SIDRA Roundabout Methodology was used to validate the results of HCM 2010 Roundabout analysis and provide a range of analysis results. SIDRA is a computer software program that can analyze Roundabouts using TurnKey Page 35 cog, LLC Total 2035 Volume (vph) CDOT Turn Lane Warrants Lane Turn Lane (Based on higher F -R Access Classification Warranted? traffic volume of AM Speed Limit = 25 mph or PM peak hour Right -IN Right -OUT (RIRO) Access (Left -turn IN and Out Prohibited) WB Left -turn Deceleration Lane Movement will be Prohibited (inbound) Traffic will make a U -turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access EB Right -Turn Deceleration Lane Right -Turn IN More than 50 vph YES (inbound) DHV = 239 NB -WB Left -Turn Acceleration Lane Movement will be Prohibited (Outbound) Traffic will make a U -turn at the Existing Roundabout at the Main Vail Interchange NB -EB Right -Turn Acceleration Lane Right -Turn OUT Not required on multi -lane No (outbound) DHV = 186 highways of this category Table 13 shows that an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane (EB RT Decel Lane) will be required at the VVMC Access to the Frontage Road. The EB RT Decel Lane was included in the roadway configuration for the traffic analysis discussed in the next section. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations was analyzed at the three Study Area intersections. The following sections describe the analysis and results for each Study Area intersection. 6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC Access was analyzed using the FHWA Roundabout Methodology, which utilizes the methods and calculations in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). In addition to the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, the SIDRA Roundabout Methodology was used to validate the results of HCM 2010 Roundabout analysis and provide a range of analysis results. SIDRA is a computer software program that can analyze Roundabouts using TurnKey Page 35 cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS either 1) the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, or 2) the SIDRA Methodology. The Roundabout analysis was conducted twice for each Methodology, once with the "Default" factors and parameters, and a second time with factors and parameters approved by CDOT and FHWA as part of the System Level Study for the Wolcott traffic study, including: • Critical Gap = 4.05 seconds • Follow Up Headway = 2.50 seconds Proposed Roundabout Location and Configuration The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. WMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the WMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This WMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the WMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. The following sections describe the Interim and Build -out conditions, and Roundabout analysis results. 6.1.1 Interim Condition [Year 2018 — Completion of the WMC Reconstruction] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, which is anticipated to be year 2018. Table 14 shows the LOS, delay, and queuing results of the roundabout analysis based on the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology. Table 15 compares the results from the HCM 2010 and SIDRA Roundabout analyses methodologies. The Appendix contains the Roundabout analysis output. TurnKey Page 36 cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Table 14 - Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] Roundabout Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LO S — Delay (sec) 95th % Queue (ft) LOS — Delay (sec) 95th % Queue (ft) (FHWA- Approved (Default Factors (Default Factors Approach pp Factors & Parameters) West Leg (Frontage Road) A-5 20 A-9 70 East Leg (Frontage Road A-6 50 A-6 50 South Leg (Evergreen Lodge Access) A-6 20 A-9 20 North Leg TOV Service Access A-6 20 A-6 20 South Leg A -6 A -6 B -10 Overall Roundabout all vehicles A - 6 50 (max) A - 7 70 (max) Table 15 - Roundabout Analysis: Compare Various Methodologies T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 37 co! nsul nr , LLC HCM 2010 SIDRA HCM 2010 SIDRA Roundabout (FHWA- Approved (FHWA- Approved (Default Factors (Default Factors Approach pp Factors & Parameters) Factors & Parameters) & Parameters) & Parameters) LOS — Delay (sec) Year Peak Hour West Leg A -5 A -2 B— 11 A -2 (Frontage Road East Leg A -6 A -2 A -7 A -2 (Frontage Road) South Leg A -6 A -6 B -10 A -6 (Evergreen Lodge Access North Leg A -6 A -7 B -10 A -7 (TOV Service Access) Overall Roundabout A-6 A-2 A— 9 A-2 Lail vehicles Year Peak Hour West Leg A -9 A -2 C -22 A -2 (Frontage Road) East Leg A -6 A -2 A -6 A -2 (Frontage Road) South Leg A-9 A-7 C— 18 A-7 (Evergreen Lodge Access) North Leg A -6 A -7 A -10 A -7 TOV Service Access Overall Roundabout A— 7 A-2 B-15 A-2 (all vehicles) T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 37 co! nsul nr , LLC WMC Master Plan TIS 6.1.2 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] Refer to the FHU memo for the year 2035 Build -out analysis. 6.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The VVMC Access on the Frontage Road was analyzed using Synchro and SimTraffic software, which is based on the HCM 2010. The analysis included the TOV Site Access as the north leg of the intersection. The following sections describe the Existing, Interim, and Build -out conditions analysis results. 6.2.1 Existing Condition [Year 2014] This analysis is based on the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access. Table 16 shows the analysis results for the Year 2014 Existing Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 16 — WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2014] 6.2.2 East End (Construction Completed) [Year 2018] VVMC has been working from the assumption that a roundabout would be constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC access. That assumption is based on the premise that adjacent properties will redevelop and provide the right -of -way necessary to construct the proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. If the adjacent properties do not redevelop such that the proposed roundabout can not be constructed prior to the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, the VVMC needs an access option that would work in the interim condition prior to the construction of the proposed roundabout. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The following sections describe the possible scenarios that could occur in year 2018 at the completion of the VVMC Master Plan. �rTumKeY,, Page 38 Cons utting, L L C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS —Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound Left -turn A-6 20 A-5 20 (Frontage Road) Westbound Left -turn A-3 50 A-9 40 (Frontage Road) Northbound Left -turn D — 31 40 E — 46 50 Right -turn A-3 A - 5 (VVMC Access) Southbound Left -turn C — 18 20 C-23 35 Right -turn B — 12 A-8 (TOVAccess) 6.2.2 East End (Construction Completed) [Year 2018] VVMC has been working from the assumption that a roundabout would be constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC access. That assumption is based on the premise that adjacent properties will redevelop and provide the right -of -way necessary to construct the proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. If the adjacent properties do not redevelop such that the proposed roundabout can not be constructed prior to the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, the VVMC needs an access option that would work in the interim condition prior to the construction of the proposed roundabout. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The following sections describe the possible scenarios that could occur in year 2018 at the completion of the VVMC Master Plan. �rTumKeY,, Page 38 Cons utting, L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 6.2.2.1 Existing Roadway Configuration on the Frontage Road The VVMC Access on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) scenario using the existing roadway configuration. Table 17 shows what can be expected at the VVMC Access if Frontage Road improvements (proposed roundabout or "First and Alone" alternative) are not constructed prior to the completion of the East End of the VVMC Campus. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 17 - WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2018] 6.2.2.2 "First and Alone" Alternative As stated in the introduction to Section 6.2.2, VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". These improvements are listed below. The Appendix contains a sketch of the "First and Alone" alternative. The "First and Alone" alternative was analyzed using year 2035 traffic volumes to see how it would operate beyond the completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018. Table 18 shows the results of the "First and Alone" alternative analysis. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. "First and Alone" Alternative Improvements on the Frontage Road • Construct a raised median on the Frontage Road that: • Converts the VVMC Access to RIRO, with a break in the raised median so that emergency vehicles can make a left -turn into VVMC. • Converts the TOV Access to 3/ with a left -turn acceleration lane for outbound left- turns; the left -turn IN will be prohibited. • Construct an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane at the VVMC Access (per requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code — see Table 13) • Construct a bulb -out at the Evergreen Lodge Main Access that would accommodate westbound to eastbound U- turns. �, Tur1 Key Page 39 J -- -�I ` _ co! nsultin , Ltc VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 18 — VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] VVMC Access is RIRO. TOV Access is % (Left -turn IN arohibited) 6.2.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] The year 2035 Build -out Condition includes proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. Table 19 shows the analysis results for the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 19 — WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TOV Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Pronosed Roundabout) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour n Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) und Shared Left- C — 16 30 C — 19 50 ss I and Right -Turn nd Right -turn A-4 55 A — 10 105 ess) nd odge U -turn A-5 95 B — 13 120 6.2.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] The year 2035 Build -out Condition includes proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. Table 19 shows the analysis results for the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 19 — WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TOV Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Pronosed Roundabout) 6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four -way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End TurnKey Page 40 cog, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Northbound Right -turn A-3 45 A-8 95 VVMC Access Southbound Right -turn A-4 35 A-5 50 TOV Access 6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four -way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End TurnKey Page 40 cog, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Construction). However, the traffic data obtained in February 2014 showed that the peak hour trips to /from the US Bank Building were 36 vph (AM) and 43 (PM). Based on the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection (AM = 316 vph, PM =518 vph), the increase in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive to /from the US Bank Building is only 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM). The Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection was analyzed using Synchro and SimTraffic software, which is based on the HCM 2010, to compare the existing Condition to the East End (During Construction) to show the impact of using West Meadow Drive to access the US Bank Building parking. After the East End parking structure is completed, the VVMC main access will be on the Frontage Road. Except for service vehicles, all VVMC trips will use the new VVMC main access on the Frontage Road. The following sections describe the Existing, Interim, and Build -out conditions analysis results. 6.3.1 Existing Condition [Year 2014] This analysis is based on the existing roadway configuration at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection. Table 20 shows the analysis results for the Year 2014 Existing Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 20 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2014] 6.3.2 East End (During Construction) [Year 2017] The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 21 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow TurnKey Page 41 Cog, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS —Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound A-7 55 B — 11 100 (West Meadow Drive) Westbound A-9 50 B — 10 70 (East Meadow Drive) Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 100 (Vail Road) Southbound A-9 95 B — 10 95 (Vail Road) Overall Intersection A-9 95 (max) B — 11 100 (max) all vehicles 6.3.2 East End (During Construction) [Year 2017] The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 21 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow TurnKey Page 41 Cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 21— Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] Table 21 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End parking structure when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. 6.3.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] After the WMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 vehicles per day (based on August 2013 traffic count) to less than 20 trips per day (service vehicles only). The existing peak hour WMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the WMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. Therefore, the year 2035 Build -out Condition was not analyzed at this intersection. 7 Conclusion and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. WMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized �, Tur1 Key Page 42 J -- -�I "�_ co! nsultin , LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound A-7 50 B — 10 95 West Meadow Drive Westbound A — 10 55 A-9 65 East Meadow Drive Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 90 Vail Road Southbound A — 10 115 B — 11 100 Vail Road Overall Intersection A-9 115 (max) B — 11 100 (max) aii vehicles Table 21 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End parking structure when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. 6.3.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] After the WMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 vehicles per day (based on August 2013 traffic count) to less than 20 trips per day (service vehicles only). The existing peak hour WMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the WMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. Therefore, the year 2035 Build -out Condition was not analyzed at this intersection. 7 Conclusion and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. WMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized �, Tur1 Key Page 42 J -- -�I "�_ co! nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone ". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over - designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. 7.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. /f the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. The "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access (RIRO) and TOV Access (3/4 movement) thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. 7.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction due to the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building being accesses via West Meadow Drive. However, the increase in traffic at this intersection will only be 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM), and there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at this intersection. No changes are recommended at this intersection. TurnKey Page 43 cog, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Appendix • Methodology submitted to TOV and CDOT • Traffic Count Data • Winter Season Traffic Counts — February 4, 2014 • Summer Season Traffic Counts —August 21 -22, 2013 • Peak Hour Calculations • Project Trip Generation Calculations • Project Trip Distribution Calculations • FHU Email to TOV Regarding Traffic Forecasts • Evergreen Lodge • Select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study prepared in year 2008 • Trip Generation and Distribution Calculations • Traffic Volumes at Study Area Intersections • Proposed Roundabout Analysis Output [Intersection #1 ] • Frontage Road and WMC Access Analysis Output [Intersection #2] o "First and Alone" Alternative Sketch • Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Output [Intersection #3] • FHU Memo regarding Proposed Roundabout, dated August 1, 2014 �, TgmKey Page 44 J -- -�I ` _ co! nsultin , LLC Traffic Volume Development — VVMC Master Plan TIS Methodology submitted to TOV and CDOT Tu rn Key Consulting, LLC Mark Bunnell From: Tom Kassmel <TKassmel @vailgov.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 2:38 PM To: 'Harbert - CDOT, Kent'; Mark Bunnell Cc: Daniel Roussin; Daniel Feeney; Skip Hudson Subject: RE: Vail Valley Medical Center - Study Area & Traffic Data Methodology Mark, See my response below in bold. • Study area will only include the potential VVMC Main Access (south leg) and TOV municipal building access (north leg) to the 1 -70 South Frontage Road. I agree the roundabout does not necessarily be analyzed, however we will have to understand the impacts of a new intersection on the multiple adjacent intersections as Kent suggests. • Collecting traffic counts for two weekday AM & PM peak hour periods will be sufficient to calculate the existing trip generation. I would guess that Summer mid week traffic patterns are significantly lower from winter. would suggest that a winter count be done as well, during a busier time period. The Town of Vail did winter counts along the Frontage Road this past winter that can be used as a comparison. • Existing and future background traffic volumes for the 1 -70 South Frontage Road will be based on the Vail MOB traffic study, the Vail TMP, and follow -up work by FHU. Ok From: Harbert - CDOT, Kent [mailto:kent.harbert @state.co.us] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 4:21 PM To: Mark Bunnell Cc: Daniel Roussin; Tom Kassmel; Daniel Feeney; Skip Hudson Subject: Re: Vail Valley Medical Center - Study Area & Traffic Data Methodology Mark, I am not familiar with the previous study, but based on what you say about it I am okay with not analyzing the roundabout at the interchange. However, I do see that there a half dozen or so access onto the frontage road in proximity to this project that will need to be addressed at some point in the process. Thanks, Xent T. Kent Harbert, PE Access Engineer CDOT Region 3, Traffic and Safety Residency 222 South 6th Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, CO 81501 -3794 Phone: 970-683-6279 Cell: 970-812-6768 Fax: 970-683-6290 kent.harbertAstate.co.us On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Mark Bunnell <markbLturnkeyllc.net> wrote: Dan, Kent, and Tom, I am in the very early stages of a traffic study related to a potential master plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) and want to get confirmation on the study area and traffic data. Typically, I would submit a full methodology (study area, traffic data, land use, trip generation & distribution, analysis periods & methods, etc), but at this point we just want to get the traffic counted before the summer season ends. I will submit a full methodology at a later date, assuming the master plan effort moves forward. Please review the details below and provide comments. Project The VVMC is looking at doing a master plan for their Vail campus, but the work is very preliminary and the possible concepts described in this email have not been finalized. The possible redevelopment of the VVMC could change the layout such that the VVMC Main Access would be on the 1 -70 South Frontage Road, instead of on West Meadow Dr as it is today. There would possibly be a service access on West Meadow Drive that would not be used by patrons or employees so the future VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive would be lower than existing. Study Area The study area will only include one intersection — the potential VVMC Main Access to the 1 -70 South Frontage Road (see aerial image below). The TOV municipal building would be the north leg of the potential VVMC Main Access. -lox, ANEW .r . We considered including the south roundabout at the Vail interchange in the study area, but did not include it for the following reasons: • The TOV completed an extensive evaluation of alternatives at the Main Vail Interchange Roundabouts as part of the 2025 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Vail TMP). The Vail TMP concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at the interchange, and concluded that other system -wide improvements would be needed to provide an acceptable level of service (LOS) at the interchange. 2 .': We considered including the south roundabout at the Vail interchange in the study area, but did not include it for the following reasons: • The TOV completed an extensive evaluation of alternatives at the Main Vail Interchange Roundabouts as part of the 2025 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Vail TMP). The Vail TMP concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at the interchange, and concluded that other system -wide improvements would be needed to provide an acceptable level of service (LOS) at the interchange. 2 • The Vail TMP discusses how reconfiguring the VVMC so that its main access is on the 1 -70 South Frontage Road would improve the south roundabout. On page 37 of the Vail TMP it states: An�'A-,-�r co-is J.? -Aivn is = ll r Table G. Lw ro-. s:',s bq.la•7#ifec. is to nic- 6-;:--iti cn is Hospl #al = vtess. T,e t:il''.n C,. %9v Ma' Cer.v -I v,tf, ser.ed b-i I'y1eado', Crve J-a i:Iii III Q: it5 ;I fic mpacts .Fe sovt i raundabOLA Inte -se c',io -i tial c'n.I F')I,.Ith�l It ?,l, Ile :1'rl`k II, 'I,P f 'fanning prOcevs to reconfigure Its fac lt'�' 5 1'1, th..1t It " I:;IIt I1:1V, 1:-1 -tot I i ;.- ' 1;:11t:i9e Roll o' est of the FOUiid i o'3t acr05,!. friJr11 'I1 C- I %1,1 "1';'11: 1''. i_;enter This 'r;o.ISd Sh "i " sari,= O th s `a+cisrcr s tr Vt; c c� -it of the south rULIIItRiL'Alt LIIId Off Or the S01 -1th 1_D3C;1'Ai3. 19J ',', "lien IS 1�'FCJ &C7_ 'C3CFtl'3'_ 3' 3 poor LOS. Ths 1 'Ic11tY I'9tilllll'eS C�wl':;11,3ti =1' .4 th the nther nva'o -M" J es. 'LiCC&SS P0111ts. ;`_Jt 14 couid offer a small } _-- :' 'If t'3fiC -91 e' GJ thv hea'.,i'Y -uses _cu #h FOL. rcaLcut. Turn Key Consulting prepared a traffic study for the Vail Medical Office Building (Vail MOB) in 2012. The traffic study was completed, but not submitted because the Vail MOB project did not continue. The Vail MOB consisted of constructing a medical office building and parking garage on the north side of the 1 -70 South Frontage Road adjacent to the TOV municipal building. The Vail MOB / TOV municipal building access (north leg) would have lined up with the potential access to the VVMC main access (south leg). As part of the Vail MOB traffic study, CDOT and the TOV reviewed and approved a methodology that stated that the study area would only include the access to the Vail MOB, and not include the south roundabout at the Vail Interchange for the first reason listed above. Traffic Volume Data Turn Key Consulting plans to calculate the trip generation for the VVMC master plan based on the existing trips to /from the VVMC campus. In order to do that, we plan to conduct traffic counts at the three existing accesses to the VVMC campus for the durations listed below. The trip generation based on the summer season will be factored to the peak season (winter). • AM & PM peak periods (two hours each) • Two Weekdays (rues & Wed OR Wed & Thur) The existing and future background traffic volumes on the 1 -70 South Frontage Road will come from previous studies [Vail MOB traffic study prepared by Turn Key Consulting, Vail TMP, and follow -up work by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) on a potential roundabout at the VVMC / MOB access (see attached memo)]. The previous studies are based on the peak season (winter) so we do not plan on counting the traffic on the 1 -70 South Frontage Road. Summary At this point I am looking for confirmation on the following: • Study area will only include the potential VVMC Main Access (south leg) and TOV municipal building access (north leg) to the 1 -70 South Frontage Road • Collecting traffic counts for two weekday AM & PM peak hour periods will be sufficient to calculate the existing trip generation • Existing and future background traffic volumes for the 1 -70 South Frontage Road will be based on the Vail MOB traffic study, the Vail TMP, and follow -up work by FHU. Please call or email if you have questions. Thanks, Mark Bunnell, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC M: 970 - 640 -2677 O: 970 - 985 -4001 markba-turnkeyllc. net 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 Networks Unlimited FilterIT identified this as CLEAN. Give feedback: This is SPAM • More WMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Count Data • Winter Season Traffic Counts —February 4, 2014 • Summer Season Traffic Counts —August 21 -22, 2013 Turn Key Consulting, LLC ]uperiw Nr vjecl �e adership WMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Counts Collected on Wednesday and Thursday, August 21 -22, 2013 Date /Time 08/21/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/21/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/21/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/21/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/21/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/21/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/21/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/21/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/21/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/21/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/21/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/21/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/21/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/21/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/21/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/21/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/22/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/22/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/22/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/22/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/22/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/22/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/22/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/22/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/22/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/22/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/22/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/22/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/22/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/22/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Max PM Peak Hour Max Guest Access (W Meadow Dr) Service Access (W Meadow Dr) Employee Access (Frontage Road) SIB OUT NB IN SB OUT NB IN NB OUT SB IN 0000 21 0 0 ©� 139 0 ®000 2 0 ©® 32 © ©000® ®0 © ©000® ©000 ©0000 ©® 000 ®0000 ©� 00000® ®® 0 ©00 ®0 00000 21 0 0 17 139 00000 30 2 0 ©® 32 © ®000© ®0 0 ©000© ®000 ©0000 ®0 ® ®0000 �000�0 ®® 0 ©00 ®0 00000 21 0 0 17 139 ©000 30 2 0 ©® 32 © ©000 ®0 00000® 0 ©0000 0000® ©000 ®® 0�000� 00000 21 0 0 17 139 000000 30 2 0 48 32 0000 ®0 00000© 00000 12 21 0 0 17 139 44 30 2 0 48 32 Page 1 of 1 Total WMC Trips OUT I IN 3 20 1 60 13 38 9 24 7 22 8 32 2 29 6 19 30 144 23 12 15 19 18 16 19 6 26 15 20 22 29 17 19 8 94 62 4 34 5 61 7 31 13 34 7 12 9 37 17 33 10 22 29 160 13 21 16 13 23 12 24 14 16 8 11 18 21 18 29 21 77 65 29 160 94 62 WMC Master Plan TIS Peak Hour Calculations Turn Key Consulting, LLC ].P-- Nr vjecl Leadership U (6 H m O N O) 0 CO LL �> � U (6 c� U U > >C > O U) m Q- E O U O (6 N a_ N Q i U � O � O CO CO O � N N ('') � H � N O o � M m w � � Cfl O � � � r CO 00 ('') CC O� N N � CO (6 �j N (6 (6 (6 (6 � O L(') O L(7 c� v O � O N I� � ao ao M c� v O � O Co Co FFI,�� M IR CO O a0 CO N V V a0 I� (6 CO V 'q LO CO N V N V CO H cn���N� N VCO CO CO -O O N O ('� ('� V I� N � O � N � Z N ('') N ('') V I� � CO � o �vo�c� v o� c� CD � o � o � o � c�vo� c� vo � �MOrnrnallo H 0 rn ti v o 0 � Z V to � � V O- C C C C N (6 � (6 (6 (6 N I� � 00 00 00 � tD N 00 O I� a0 � N � O H � L(7 00 I� 00 ('') 00 ('') 00 O -00 I� O ('') O�� O O O � Z N� ('') ('') V ('') N N N C (6 � (1) LO O � O � CD LO O ~ O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 �O ao rn M OI— O� O O O � CO — N N M N 00 V O V ( ('�') O � CO CO CO to Cfl � � V L(7 O O - O - O V N N O O O O O O - - V V I I- C CO (o (o CO CO M CO CO N N N O O 00 00 � O I- (fl ('7 N V I- � � ti � CO V N � C Cfl C N N N N N N N N N d v � O o� L(') O CO L(7 v O�r>vo L(7 O L(7 O v v v v v p iri iri iri Co LO C C) L LO C CD L LO C CD L LO o o o� CO v C�r>vo ri ri ri ri p v v v iri o6 o o� o o6 C CS L Lo C CS L Lo C CS L Lo o— c c�vo — CQ — G r..r ...i i m d �+ LL s 0 0 N Q i U � O � O CO CO O � N N ('') � H � N O o � M m w � � Cfl O � � � r CO 00 ('') CC O� N N � CO (6 �j N (6 (6 (6 (6 � O L(') O L(7 c� v O � O N I� � ao ao M c� v O � O Co Co FFI,�� M IR CO O a0 CO N V V a0 I� (6 CO V 'q LO CO N V N V CO H cn���N� N VCO CO CO -O O N O ('� ('� V I� N � O � N � Z N ('') N ('') V I� � CO � o �vo�c� v o� c� CD � o � o � o � c�vo� c� vo � �MOrnrnallo H 0 rn ti v o 0 � Z V to � � V O- C C C C N (6 � (6 (6 (6 N I� � 00 00 00 � tD N 00 O I� a0 � N � O H � L(7 00 I� 00 ('') 00 ('') 00 O -00 I� O ('') O�� O O O � Z N� ('') ('') V ('') N N N C (6 � (1) LO O � O � CD LO O ~ O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 �O ao rn M OI— O� O O O � CO — N N M N 00 V O V ( ('�') O � CO CO CO to Cfl � � V L(7 O O - O - O V N N O O O O O O - - V V I I- C CO (o (o CO CO M CO CO N N O O 00 00 � O I- (fl ('7 00 N V I- � � ti � CO V N � C Cfl C N N N N N N N N N � O o� L(') O CO L(7 v O�r>vo L(7 O L(7 O v v v v p iri iri iri Co LO C C) L LO C CD L LO C CD L LO o o o� CO v C�r>vo ri ri ri ri p v v v iri o6 o o� o o6 C CS L CO O a0 CO N V V a0 I� (6 CO V 'q LO CO N V N V CO H cn���N� N VCO CO CO -O O N O ('� ('� V I� N � O � N � Z N ('') N ('') V I� � CO � o �vo�c� v o� c� CD � o � o � o � c�vo� c� vo � �MOrnrnallo H 0 rn ti v o 0 � Z V to � � V O- C C C C N (6 � (6 (6 (6 N I� � 00 00 00 � tD N 00 O I� a0 � N � O H � L(7 00 I� 00 ('') 00 ('') 00 O -00 I� O ('') O�� O O O � Z N� ('') ('') V ('') N N N C (6 � (1) LO O � O � CD LO O ~ O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 �O ao rn M OI— O� O O O � CO — N N M N 00 V O V ( ('�') O � CO CO CO to Cfl � � V L(7 O O - O - O V N N O O O O O O - - V V I I- C CO (o (o CO CO M CO CO N N O O 00 00 � O I- (fl ('7 00 N V I- � � ti � CO V N � C Cfl C N N N N N N N N N � O o� L(') O CO L(7 v O�r>vo L(7 O L(7 O v v v v p iri iri iri Co LO C C) L LO C CD L LO C CD L LO o o o� CO v C�r>vo ri ri ri � �MOrnrnallo H 0 rn ti v o 0 � Z V to � � V O- C C C C N (6 � (6 (6 (6 N I� � 00 00 00 � tD N 00 O I� a0 � N � O H � L(7 00 I� 00 ('') 00 ('') 00 O -00 I� O ('') O�� O O O � Z N� ('') ('') V ('') N N N C (6 � (1) LO O � O � CD LO O ~ O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 �O ao rn M OI— O� O O O � CO — N N M N 00 V O V ( ('�') O � CO CO CO to Cfl � � V L(7 O O - O - O V N N O O O O O O - - V V I I- C CO (o (o CO CO M CO CO N N O O 00 00 � O I- (fl ('7 00 N V I- � � ti � CO V N � C Cfl C N N N N N N N N N � O o� L(') O CO L(7 v O�r>vo L(7 O L(7 O v v N 00 O I� a0 � N � O H � L(7 00 I� 00 ('') 00 ('') 00 O -00 I� O ('') O�� O O O � Z N� ('') ('') V ('') N N N C (6 � (1) LO O � O � CD LO O ~ O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 �O ao rn M OI— O� O O O � CO — N N M N 00 V O V ( ('�') O � CO CO CO to Cfl � � V L(7 O O - O - O V N N O O O O O O - - V V I I- C CO (o (o CO CO M CO CO N N O O 00 00 � O I- (fl ('7 00 N V I- � � ti � CO V N � C Cfl C N N N N N N N N N � O o� L(') O CO L(7 v O�r>vo L(7 O L(7 O v v v v p iri iri iri Co LO C C) L LO C CD L LO C CD L LO o o o� CO � V �O ao rn M OI— O� O O O � CO — N N M N 00 V O V ( ('�') O � CO CO CO to Cfl � � V L(7 O O - O - O V N N O O O O O O - - V V I I- C CO (o (o CO CO M CO CO N N O O 00 00 � O I- (fl ('7 00 N V I- � � ti � CO V N � C Cfl C N N N N N N N N N � O o� L(') O CO L(7 v O�r>vo L(7 O L(7 O v v v v p iri iri iri Co LO C C) L LO C CD L LO C CD L LO o o o� CO v C�r>vo ri ri ri ri p v v v iri o6 o o� o o6 C CS L Lo C CS L Lo C � V O O O � � V L L� V V C CO � � L L� L L(7 V V ( ('�') O r CO N N O O - - 0 00 N N O O O O O O - - V V I I- C CO N C CO � � C CO ( (� V V A A N N 0 00 N N V V O O C CO L(') C CO C CO C CO I I� � � C Cfl C Cfl � � C Cfl V V ( ('7 � � � C C) L LO C C) L LO C C) L LO C CD L LO C CD L LO o o o6 o o� o o6 C CS L Lo C CS L Lo C CS L Lo o— c c�vo — — N O ti 0') 1- N N Cfl 0 00 O T O O O O O O N N N N - N N a0 O p a0 N CO V CO O � (� CO rnO prn ao �COCOCo � T O L(') L(7 O L(7 O L(7 O v v M v iri iri iri iri Co ri ri M co v v v v iri M 00 ('� CO L(7 L(7 � 00 ('� O � N CO 00 (o CO L(7 L(7 L(7 L(7 V L(7 L(7 V CO L(7 � O O CO O L(7 N O CO L(7 00 S O N CO L(7 L(7 00 00 00 � CO � O N - ('') N N N -1-1 N� N H L(') O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 O L(7 O ('') ('') ('') ('') V V V V L(7 L(7 L(7 L(7 i aD c� WMC Master Plan TIS Project Trip Generation Calculations Turn Key Co:nsuHrny. L.L.0 U) H (6 a N N U G i O U (6 U O N 0 O_ H n F o v o O o S o 0 ° ° LL a fy U 0 F ° O - O° N m LL > = V 0 ° Q ~ Z O O O N N ,o. U O O N r. = F J O Z m rnvo� N r N LL� W o O O N m S F (° N 1 Q N of N 0 O Q ~ Z v in corm ° in m } o 0 0 0 o a o N � o E N U U o ° U o `o o o 0 —26 O m W W W W W W Q S o ¢ o rn v o 0 No F 0 o ° K LL 0 A o ° m U O W r_ LL O M. W O D", Z O m u� ° cro ro r. o F Ao D O N O O Q 3 -OO a a r N LL� r N N >� > S 0 N N o N O O N v p o LL LL Q N 0 Of co O N o o 0 r 0 o 0 O 0 O 0 S F O r Nco m o co n � Q 0 Z m m N N 0 n °1 LL O 0 O m O) a o o m 0° of r of o 0 0 ° 0 v m v r o LL o m i n = O ro ro ro ro o m U > a rn rn m u� u� E Z cro cro cro cro o N E 0 W F F N a ? v v v v cro ro n F ¢ � ]mm-- � ga" LL U ° o 0 m m m m o N 0 N p o A y o N N N r r o E o Q � O O O O O DES r o v N N N m V V ° o � m c m U` U U 2 �2 o w �w O o m U U n F o v o O o S o 0 ° ° LL a fy U 0 F ° O - O° N m LL > = V 0 ° Q ~ Z O O O N N ,o. U O O N r. = F J O Z m rnvo� N r N LL� W o O O N m S F (° N 1 Q N of N 0 O Q ~ Z v in corm ° in m } o 0 0 0 o a o N � o E N U U o ° U o `o o o 0 —26 O m W W W W W W S ¢ o . rn 0 0 O 0 r 0 N 0 m U O W LL W O O Ao r Li 0 V N N o N N F O N v p o LL LL N 0 S F r r m o 0 n � Q 0 Z m m N N n °1 LL O 0 O m O) 0 co LL� O) 0 m O O) 0 O O 0 ro W O) 0 rn W O) 0 m v r o LL o m 0 N rn rn rn m u� u� E W F U LL � F o � a DES r o v N N N m V V � o ° E W U W E ° o m c m U °` U U 2�2 WSW m U U n F o v o O o S o 0 ° ° LL a fy U 0 F ° O - O° N m LL > = V 0 ° Q ~ Z O O O N N ,o. U O O N r. = F J O Z m rnvo� N r N LL� W o O O N m S F (° N 1 Q N of N 0 O Q ~ Z v in corm ° in m } o 0 0 0 o a o N � o E N U U o ° U o `o o o 0 —26 O m W W W W W W WMC Master Plan TIS Project Trip Distribution Calculations Turn Key Consulting, LLC ].P-- Nr vjecl Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Trip Distribution Calculations VVMC Employee / Bank Bldg Entrance and Frontage Rd Peak Hour Total 7:30 -8:30 am 623 3:30 -4:30 pm 719 Peak Hour # Trips AM Dist. % USE # Trips PM Dist. % USE Municipal Bldg Frontage Road VVMC Employee Ent Frontage Road From North From East From South From West Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 5 0 3 84 265 39 3 0 18 2 193 11 13 0 5 26 278 5 2 0 29 2 350 9 Trip Distribution Percentages - Frontage Road (Based on Vehicles IN and OUT at VVMC access on Frontage Road) Inbound Outbound From the East (WB LT) From the West (EB RT) To the East (NB RT) To the West (NB LT) Vail Road and Meadows Drive Peak Hour Vail Rd W Meadows Dr Vail Rd W Meadows Dr From North From East From South From West Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Right 7:30 -8:30 am 3:30 -4:30 pm Peak Hour #Trips AM Dist. USE #Trips PM Dist. USE 84 From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) 11 To the South (EB RT) 18 3 88.4% 11.6% 85.7% 14.3% 90% 10% 85% 15% Vail Road and Meadows Drive Peak Hour Vail Rd W Meadows Dr Vail Rd W Meadows Dr From North From East From South From West Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Right 7:30 -8:30 am 3:30 -4:30 pm Peak Hour #Trips AM Dist. USE #Trips PM Dist. USE 26 From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) 9 To the South (EB RT) 29 2 74.3% 25.7% 93.5% 6.5% 75% 25% 950/. 5% Vail Road and Meadows Drive Peak Hour Vail Rd W Meadows Dr Vail Rd W Meadows Dr From North From East From South From West Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Right 7:30 -8:30 am 3:30 -4:30 pm Peak Hour #Trips AM Dist. USE #Trips PM Dist. USE Trip Distribution Percentages -Vail Road (Based on Vehicles IN and OUT at Meadow Drive and Vail Road Intersection) Inbound Outbound From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) To the South (EB RT) 123 9 Trip Distribution Percentages -Vail Road (Based on Vehicles IN and OUT at Meadow Drive and Vail Road Intersection) Inbound Outbound From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) To the South (EB RT) Page 1 of 1 88 4 123 9 95.7% 4.3% 93.2% 6.8% 95% 5% 95% 5% Page 1 of 1 WMC Master Plan TIS FHU Email to TOV Regarding Traffic Forecasts Turn Key Consulting, LLC ].P-- Nr vjecl Leadership Page 1 of 2 Skip Hudson From: Tom Kassmel [TKassmel @vailgov.com] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 8:23 AM To: Skip Hudson; Michael O'Connor (michael @triumphdev.com) Cc: Greg Hall Subject: FW: VOlumes I asked FHU to weigh in on the growth rate after 2025. See below. From: Chris.Fasching [mailto: Chris. Fasching@FHUENG.COM] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 3:01 PM To: Tom Kassmel Subject: RE: VOlumes Tom, We used 0.5% per year growth in the stud hich is pretty darn flat. I think you could safely apply this rate out to 2034. Thanks. Chris Fasching, PE, PTOE Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 303 - 721 -1440 Fax - 303 - 721 -0832 From: Tom Kassmel rmailto:TKassmel @ vailgov.coml Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:58 PM To: Chris.Fasching Subject: VOlumes Chris Would you be able to weigh in on the appropriate growth rate for post 2025. So Turnkey (Skip) can extrapolate to 2034. We all agree it should be relatively flat compared to the growth we project until 2025, your thoughts? Tom Kassmel Town Engineer Public Works Department $1 rowM of v 970.479.2235 vailgov.com twitter.com /vailgov Vs 8/14/2012 WMC Master Plan TIS Evergreen Lodge Select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study prepared in year 2008 Trip Generation and Distribution Calculations Tu rn Key Consulting. LLC Superior Projec't I— d-ship T P A N S P R T A T 1 N G P U P October 3, 2008 Mr. Adam Williams ARC Integrated Program Management, Inc. 179038 th Street, Unit 105 Boulder, CO 80301 RE: Fairmont Vail Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Williams: Fox Higgins has completed a traffic impact analysis for the proposed Fairmont Vail project located on the south side of the S. Frontage Road roughly 850 feet west of the main Vail roundabout. This analysis has been completed following "Level Three" traffic assessment requirements per Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Region 3. Per CDOT requirements, this analysis evaluates potential traffic impacts along the S. Frontage Road with respect to operational considerations and auxiliary lane needs for the short -term build -out and long -term (20 -year) scenarios. Since the project and adjacent roadways are anticipated to generate the highest traffic volumes during the peak winter season, this study analyzes the peak winter scenario for the highest of the AM, PM and Saturday peak hour volumes. This memorandum summarizes our analysis and findings. Project Description The Fairmont Vail project is proposing to redevelop the existing Evergreen Lodge hotel with similar uses to include hotel rooms, on -site restaurant and meeting facilities, fractional- ownership units, and residential condominium units. The project site is located along the S. Frontage Rd. just west of mile marker 176. A vicinity map is provided on Figure 1. Nearby accesses and intersections include the main Vail roundabout (Vail Road and 1 -70 interchange) located roughly 850 feet east of the east site access, the existing Lionshead parking structure access located roughly 650 feet west of the west site access, and driveways for adjacent uses to the east. Two access driveways along the S. Frontage Road currently serve the site. These accesses are not shared or used by any other properties. The project proposes to relocate the easternmost access roughly 45 feet to the west of the current location, with the east access to serve only service vehicles with redevelopment. The existing westernmost access will serve as the main site access. This access location may need to be adjusted slightly to accommodate grades, though is shown in roughly the existing access location based on the current site plan. The site plan depicting the existing and proposed access points is shown on Figure 2. P.O. Box 1 976B, BOULDER, C❑LORA❑❑ B 03❑B-276B PHONE' 3073-652-3571 ■ FAx: 3 113- 772-2329 ors 3 03- 652-6574 co O M 0 O r _^ CU C >a U O Q E (B U LL aH aH cu 1 u 0 Q v a N N ❑ z 0 ¢ O F O *k 2 U- F o o 5 O O O M O {y � a F O C O C h @ M N N -Op A � O O = y d — b A � O O _ f7A d P M O � O M y a I\ Om a a � IL @ Lo M a F V V O M ^ T m A C — Ln @ M M M M N h T � A � N= C — ~ W A m M M a P ~ a o 0 0 2 IL IL a I ep 10 o. M M M CM, N A o N N o. d = N h N N N N O h C — M M P � F q @ F T ` A 0 W Y= a ?> A F N a r M A 5 O r CO r CO N O co C — N CO N CO N co co O. N �D w M y F 0 0 0 0 A m d ~ P P w y F i o rP. Lo 0 0 O F N M T A O O) v ccoo N ro co C O N ^ co co d d i P h 0 M F o 0 0 O) •- O A 5 O P a O `9 rn M Ln � f0 N N N N CO r 7 a d EL N N A O) N O) O) CO O) O) O 0 ate•"— o 0 0 0 O 9 O O O o N N z N N CO i a c a E a E a E - O) o U O CO U O OUd' U O OUP OUd' N p� c N X W d d O o. o 0�9�, o l 0 0 S •� z 'oS a a°i o a 3 A o 9 o G v o m E U O OU d' °- c N X W d d 0 a J y O O d N o 9 w 3 a A o a° o a 0 o c N a EL o J y O E 0 d w t G v � o [if W 9 ,N O m Q O m O m O U W R N a G F o o 5 O O O M O {y M CL F O C @ N M V O b A � O O _ f7A d — M O � n I\ Om P a M N V F O M N M M N Ln @ M M M M N h T � A � N= C — W A m M M M P ~ IL a I IL N N o. O N h N N N N O h C — M LO M M M q @ F T ` A 0 W Y= ?> A F a Q o 0 0 0 A — y F •A � 0 O F O) Oa O) M cl @ i o 0 0 o N A 5 O rn M a O `9 rn M v M co a C O O @ O m M r N d EL N N ~ � N A O) Oa O) O) M P p F N N N N CO i a A O) O) O) CO O 0 0�9�, o 0 0 0 z c U O OU[ U O OU d' U O OU d' N p� c N X W d d 0 a 3 A a° o a 0 o c N m EL o J y O E 0 d w a o 0 J m o Z a G F lw y t at G = a v = T: [if W '0 m m m U W R N F o o a M a d N fC 2 CU G i7 i 0 .� N_ C C O 0 (7 a H N 01 O d m d W 00 ° a o z m° N ik m O m A v m c2 O H H o O a Z W O W H ie O r V W M O H H = o o V O ? 0 0 F W N N w N° W V W w c� o- O � � K O _ � O F O O w a + + Q X X L O J J � A O rorn W O O Y � II II A F F G \ \ a oo � 00 -a ° Y = O 7 V o H = F � m N O = 00 m z 0 0 � a W v '- N � A v � a co 0 N O O W o N O + o y X w o '59 a - J w 00 II II F F J V I� V (O O O N F N O O U °5 a Z c w >N fl- 2 U F L O N O w F N_ M N O w O U 6 = O c U A J - w a � N Y w O o( ~ N V r a O. Z_ V N O ik r co r� F N O r O H ° O. Z V N O H O r (O O (O O H = 0 0 ° M V O ? 0 0 o N w � � K O O Y m oo w a + a � X X L O J � A 0 Q m rn W 00 Y � II II (Q A ~ F � J G \ \ � 00 -tea Y = o. H - F N W N O = 00 z o 0 U A ~ N W N Z w O- � ~ w v rn N � A v � a N M O 0 y � X w o a - � w 0 � I I K ~ J N O N I� O O N F N E � O O N � K °8 -a Z c � w Q U F O w O w � F N_ � M N O w O N '6 = O c U A mo J - w a � N Y w O O O M � N M M N M M -tea Y = o. H - F N W N O = 00 z o 0 U A ~ N W N Z w O- � ~ w v rn N � A v � a N M O 0 y � X w o a - � w 0 � I I K ~ J N O N I� O O N F N E � O O N � K °8 -a Z c � w Q U F O w O w � F N_ � M N O w O N '6 = O c U A mo J - w a � N Y w O O O M � N M WMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Volumes at Study Area Intersections Turn Key Coiisulting, LLC U U N O a` a 0 Y m lollsmom � 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 smilloom 1111111M smillsom IN111111 smilloom III iioo iioiiiio iioiiiio 11111111111111111111111111 � 0110 21111112 01111110 01111110 1111111101111110 INS11 somilloll INS111111 INS111111 sommillis somilloll a 1110 01111110 01111110 01111110 1111111111111111 u gill 11211119 11111111111111111111111111211111 11111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 •' a iiee iieiiiie iieiie iieiiiie iieiiie iieiiiie I� @III M111111M 21111112 91111119 m ■ono ■o■lio■o millions millions millions millions "III 11111 11111 1I 1 11,111 111111 1 11111111 INS 11111 11111 11111 0 -lIi 1--1- mill 1-1111 mill-ill > U � N F F m � a � �a N � g o O N ON r N (O M r N IA N O V M N N N O p) V N OO"t r O N O O M N O ON O p r O s¢� Y � F O 0 0 O O O O O O o F M M M M M M M M M M M N N _ o N 0 N O O ro ro r 4 Q � � F O O O O O O O O � Z J N N N N V V M M O O w W m Y a � O 0 d s 3 V N N W (O (O V V N N V O 0 O O M M N W V V H ui _ -6 a O O m N O O M M V V V V W O O M M (O w O O N N M M Q O m 4 M W m O O N O O O O O N N m r r r -11 r r OW _ Q J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N cU C ,� .�- 7 M r � U � U M V -1 O N > ; Z N R > f0 0 y6 O M N W O V V c (O N N M r O M V N M O M O B N M O O M N N O (O N 0O O N a m LL H M M M V � Q m O Q� ¢ O O O O O O O LL 'o �ti 0 N N N N N N N -s p W N N N O N N O 101 1 0 O O O O O O O O O Z M M M N N O O m m M M M M M M M N m N a a Q o N 2 N N O -O O r O N O N r r r N N r M N W M N M i N N ` W W W m O O N a O O O O O p O N N N N B p � 3 M N N 0 w m M V V 4 a� N � F m V V V w V m V m V O N O N N N N N V (O V (O m W Q F N N o p N N N N N N N N M M m F Q N N O N r F O N U O O O N M Z - W > N N m .. a 0 m '0 U m 2 '0 U m 2 'o U m 2 '0 U m 2 '0 U m 2 ` po m tr m m m U J Z F Z Z m F O Z m m m> m> U J m O m m> m> U J m O m m> m> U J m O m m> m> U J m o m m> m> U J (n U m m Q a m U m U m w o umi Q m m Q w m m Q w m m Q N m Q w ,U� m N m U U o 0 - m .- m m N m U H U °� 0 U m N m U U m O U 0 m N m U U m O U 0 m N m U H w 0 U o O U m N m U H U m 0 U -�- � Q�U� o Q�U� o Q�U� o < Q >U� ~ oQ�� > o >0 > o >0 > o >0 > o > >< >¢ o > LL 0 > LL > > LL > > LL > > LL > > LL 0 > > F F U F F U F F U F F U F F U F 6 V O O d > 0 d O O O O M O } >� m a m O o o 0 v v U s E O W U N W E O NU -a o d xxa w w Q > > 'N U v w` w V - m .0 > 0 0 O 0 O R U U 0) E > w H O H N A) a` a 0 t3) U m Cl) 0) t3) a N o0 r O 0) O O O O N N g M 10 (O 00 (O to (O O N r r 00 I- (O co I- N r O N O -It LO Cl) r LO M � M r � Cl) r LO Cl) M V H 00 0) d) 00 0 0) 00 r� 0) O d) (O N d) O r N W' co (O 00 LO r N� r In r r I- O r N N r N O a M O M O M O V O -It O It O 'It O LO O LO O LO O N O V 0 O H U)� a N N N N N N N N N N N N N C O -0 L In N 117 N N N Y7 M In M N M N M N V N -It Y7 00 (O O (D O O Z J V O V N O r O M M O V O O O O O O Q o a �° co co ao 0o ao 0o ao 0o ao 0o ao 0 0 N N N J N N N N N N N N N N N N N a y 0) LO V O 0 to N r to M 00 to V C) to O LO (O O (D r= 0 o L o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a H r r r r m W g H M N m V CO I� N o mm 00 0)M N O 0000 r N O r V r 10 J V L V N f- V N N N N N N 2- ~ cr o O (O L 0 M n Z m N N .1 m O N M (M D V (N D 00 O 00 N LO O N co co LO 1 N 0N 0 M N M N N N M N N F o O o N p O O r O O O O N N N N � WH (O N V (D p N N Cl) LO N (O 00 N N N N M M co V � V - N (O (D 0) C 2 V r V r r V r r V r r V r r V r r N r � J O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O L 0 0 o O O I- r` > ~ (D (D (D (D (D (D (D O O Z O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ° d a L O O O O O O O O g J O O O O O O O O O O O O H o W' . Cl) N CO r N CO N CO r 0 r O r y p O w � H m g J co m N O 0) , O 0) N 0 N M 0) O O O O O 0) N _ O H O U Z t N M (p N Co ll a v N a s a � N � � In . O U) o 5 o H o H Q o H Q o H Q O N Y>O Y O Y>Q Y O Y>Q �- V C O In (O r- 00 N Cl) O O O O O O O N N N N N N O a 0 C O a a C 0) a O O a a C O r> N w°-- w U w w U w O N ZJ) N O pl O -O O a x U o.5 oU E " m.5 m�? E w 2 o w g w O m o > U U a Cl) 0) t3) a WMC Master Plan TIS Proposed Roundabout Analysis Output [Intersection #1] • Year 2018 AM Peak Hour • Year 2018 PM Peak Hour Tu rn Key Consulting. LLC Superior Projec't I— d-ship WMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 AM Peak Hour • HCM 2010— FHWA- Approved Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — FHWA- Approved Factors and Parameters • HCM 2010— Default Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — Default Factors and Parameters Tu rn Key Consulting. LLC Superior Projec't 1— d-ship Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - FHWA- Approved Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 7V + N �J r f r tY r � MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - FHWA- Approved Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 8 T1 1 18 R2 70 Approach 0.114 88 East: 170 S FR 0.4 1 u U 213 1 L2 51 6 T1 800 16 R2 1 Approach 3.0 1065 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 4 T1 1 14 R2 1 Approach 50.9 3 West: 170 S FR 3.0 5 L2 1 2 T1 521 12 R2 13 Approach 6.2 535 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 24.0 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 3.7 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 22.2 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 22.3 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 24.5 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 13.7 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 24.0 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 13.1 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 23.6 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 23.7 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 4.1 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 22.0 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 16.5 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 13.2 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 24.5 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 13.2 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 24.2 3.0 0.387 5.9 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.21 0.13 23.7 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:17:50 PM Copyright © 2000 -2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com I A Project: D\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects \WMC \Traffic Analysis \170 S FR Roundy_2018- AM_HCM Wolcott.sip6 INTERSECTION V 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA- Approved Factors & Parameters Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA- Approved Factors & Parameters Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS B A B B A 1 o �J r mn MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 8 T1 1 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 18 R2 70 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 Approach 88 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 213 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 1 L2 51 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 6 T1 800 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 16 R2 1 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 Approach 1065 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 4 T1 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 14 R2 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 Approach 3 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 2 T1 521 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 12 R2 13 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 Approach 535 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.437 8.7 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.27 0.20 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Friday, August 01, 2014 8:14:01 AM Copyright © 2000 -2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects \WMC \Traffic Analysis \170 S FR Roundy_2018- AM_HCM Default.sip6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC 22.2 3.4 20.7 20.7 24.2 13.6 23.7 12.9 23.3 22.0 3.9 20.6 15.4 12.4 23.0 12.4 22.7 23.0 SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A WIt Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters 7V + N �J r f r tY r � MOVEMENT SUMMARY Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 3.0 0.154 8.7 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 24.9 8 T1 1 3.0 0.154 4.3 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 3.8 18 R2 70 3.0 0.154 4.8 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 23.0 Approach 88 3.0 0.154 5.6 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 23.1 East: 170 S FR 1 u Ll 213 3.0 0.394 7.0 LOS A 3.2 81.0 0.16 0.37 26.0 1 L2 51 3.0 0.394 5.5 LOS A 3.2 81.0 0.16 0.37 14.6 6 T1 800 3.0 0.394 0.6 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 0.18 25.4 16 R2 1 3.0 0.394 1.5 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 0.09 13.8 Approach 1065 3.0 0.394 2.1 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 0.23 25.0 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 3.0 0.006 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 24.5 4 T1 1 3.0 0.006 4.9 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 4.3 14 R2 1 3.0 0.006 5.3 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 22.7 Approach 3 3.0 0.006 6.5 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 17.0 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.247 7.0 LOS A 1.4 36.0 0.48 0.31 13.5 2 T1 521 3.0 0.247 2.1 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.48 0.30 25.1 12 R2 13 3.0 0.247 2.9 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.47 0.30 13.5 Approach 535 3.0 0.247 2.1 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.48 0.30 24.8 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.394 2.3 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.29 0.28 24.8 ....._........ Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:21:59 PM Copyright © 2000 -2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com SIDRA Project: D\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects \WMC \Traffic Analysis \170 S FR Roundy_2018- AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION V 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC WMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 PM Peak Hour • HCM 2010— FHWA- Approved Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — FHWA- Approved Factors and Parameters • HCM 2010— Default Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — Default Factors and Parameters Tu rn Key Consulting. LLC Superior Projec't 1— d-ship Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - FHWA- Approved Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A • ■ r OV 7V + N �J r f r tY r m w MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - FHWA- Approved Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 8 T1 1 18 R2 75 Approach 0.160 80 East: 170 S FR 0.5 1u U 140 1 L2 82 6 T1 791 16 R2 2 Approach 3.0 1015 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 4 T1 1 14 R2 1 Approach 46.8 4 West: 170 S FR 3.0 5 L2 1 2 T1 1136 12 R2 27 Approach 5.9 1164 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 22.7 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 3.2 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 21.1 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 20.9 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 24.7 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 13.8 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 24.1 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 13.1 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 23.3 i 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 23.5 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 4.3 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 21.9 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 18.2 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 12.7 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 23.6 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 12.8 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 23.4 3.0 0.499 7.4 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.29 0.21 23.3 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:31:04 PM Copyright © 2000 -2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com I A Project: D\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects \WMC \Traffic Analysis \170 S FR Roundy_2018- PM_HCM Wolcott.sip6 INTERSECTION V 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 ■ r Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA- Approved Factors & Parameters 7V + N �J r f r tY r m w MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA- Approved Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.204 11.1 LOS B 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 24.0 8 T1 1 3.0 0.204 6.8 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 3.4 18 R2 75 3.0 0.204 7.2 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.2 Approach 80 3.0 0.204 7.4 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.1 East: 170 S FR 1 u Ll 140 3.0 0.370 6.9 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 26.2 1 L2 82 3.0 0.370 5.4 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 14.6 6 T1 791 3.0 0.370 0.5 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.17 25.5 16 R2 2 3.0 0.370 1.4 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.08 13.9 Approach 1015 3.0 0.370 1.8 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.20 24.7 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.008 9.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 24.3 4 T1 1 3.0 0.008 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 4.5 14 R2 1 3.0 0.008 5.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 22.5 Approach 4 3.0 0.008 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 18.7 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.517 7.3 LOS A 3.8 97.3 0.57 0.35 13.4 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.57 0.35 24.9 12 R2 27 3.0 0.517 3.2 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.34 13.5 Approach 1164 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.35 24.6 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.517 2.3 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.35 0.30 24.6 ....._........ Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:33:07 PM Copyright © 2000 -2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects \WMC \Traffic Analysis \170 S FR Roundy_2018- AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS c A A c B Fo z- - 7V + F { '+ r \ -ter MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 8 T1 1 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 18 R2 75 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 Approach 80 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 140 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 1 L2 82 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 6 T1 791 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 16 R2 2 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 Approach 1015 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 4 T1 1 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 14 R2 1 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 Approach 4 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 12 R2 27 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 Approach 1164 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.765 14.8 LOS B 7.8 200.1 0.46 0.46 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Friday, August 01, 2014 8:11:26 AM Copyright © 2000 -2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects \WMC \Traffic Analysis \170 S FR Roundy_2018- PM_HCM Default.sip6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC 19.6 2.8 18.4 18.3 24.6 13.7 24.0 13.1 23.3 22.0 4.1 20.6 17.0 11.2 20.7 11.2 20.5 PAW. SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 ■ r Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters Fo z- - 7V + N �J r f r tY r m w MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.204 11.1 LOS B 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 24.0 8 T1 1 3.0 0.204 6.8 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 3.4 18 R2 75 3.0 0.204 7.2 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.2 Approach 80 3.0 0.204 7.4 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.1 East: 170 S FR 1 u Ll 140 3.0 0.370 6.9 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 26.2 1 L2 82 3.0 0.370 5.4 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 14.6 6 T1 791 3.0 0.370 0.5 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.17 25.5 16 R2 2 3.0 0.370 1.4 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.08 13.9 Approach 1015 3.0 0.370 1.8 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.20 24.7 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.008 9.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 24.3 4 T1 1 3.0 0.008 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 4.5 14 R2 1 3.0 0.008 5.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 22.5 Approach 4 3.0 0.008 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 18.7 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.517 7.3 LOS A 3.8 97.3 0.57 0.35 13.4 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.57 0.35 24.9 12 R2 27 3.0 0.517 3.2 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.34 13.5 Approach 1164 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.35 24.6 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.517 2.3 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.35 0.30 24.6 ....._........ Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:33:07 PM Copyright © 2000 -2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects \WMC \Traffic Analysis \170 S FR Roundy_2018- AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 VVMC Master Plan TIS Frontage Road and VVMC Access / TOV Access [Intersection #2] • Year 2014 — Existing Condition • Year 2018 — East End (Construction Completed) o Existing Conditions o "First and Alone" Alternative • Sketch • Analysis Output • Year 2035 — Build -out Condition NOTE. The VVMC Access and TOV Access are offset by approximately 100 -feet. Because of the offset, they were modeled as two Tee - intersections to account for the impact of the offset. In the Synchro and Sim Traffic analysis output, the VVMC Access is listed as Intersection #2, and the TOV Access is Intersection #20. TurnKey Consulting. LLG WMC Master Plan TIS Year 2014 - Existing Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj —f Lead —hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 477 11 84 707 3 18 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1853 0 2006 1863 1635 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 1853 0 2006 1863 1635 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.60 0.60 0.92 0.60 0.60 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 536 0 140 768 35 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 493 788 39 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1713 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1713 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.60 0.92 0.92 0.60 0.60 0.60 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 536 857 65 13 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 Total Del /Veh (s) 0.5 0.4 3.3 0.3 31.0 3.2 0.6 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 6.1 0.1 1.3 0.2 17.6 11.5 0.9 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.4 Total Del /Veh (s) 2.0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 11 47 64 32 Average Queue (ft) 0 23 4 14 95th Queue (ft) 6 48 30 37 Link Distance (ft) 466 54 148 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 25 Storage Blk Time ( %) 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 30 0 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB SB Directions Served L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 12 103 27 Average Queue (ft) 1 6 5 95th Queue (ft) 10 59 22 Link Distance (ft) 467 149 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 31 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 982 9 26 727 2 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1859 0 2006 1863 1623 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 1859 0 2006 1863 1623 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.92 0.50 0.50 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1085 0 52 790 62 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 1009 748 5 13 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1729 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.965 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1729 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.50 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1097 813 10 36 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 1.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 Total Del /Veh (s) 1.0 0.8 9.3 0.2 46.2 4.5 0.9 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 0.2 1.0 0.0 23.0 8.2 0.7 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.8 Total Del /Veh (s) 2.3 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 4 38 40 59 Average Queue (ft) 0 15 2 20 95th Queue (ft) 3 41 22 48 Link Distance (ft) 466 54 148 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 25 Storage Blk Time ( %) 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 0 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB SB Directions Served L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 9 75 48 Average Queue (ft) 0 3 12 95th Queue (ft) 5 51 35 Link Distance (ft) 467 149 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 39 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 WMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 - East End (Construction Completed) Existing Conditions • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj —f Lead —hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 523 21 191 775 9 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1852 0 2006 1863 1637 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 1852 0 2006 1863 1637 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 596 0 255 842 83 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 574 963 39 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.75 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 624 1047 52 11 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Del /Veh (s) 0.7 0.4 4.4 0.6 56.6 10.4 1.8 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 0.2 2.8 0.4 18.2 15.7 1.9 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del /Veh (s) 4.1 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 19 51 80 115 Average Queue (ft) 1 34 23 35 95th Queue (ft) 9 49 75 79 Link Distance (ft) 466 467 54 148 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 2 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 15 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 25 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 13 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 104 1 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB WB SB Directions Served L T R LR Maximum Queue (ft) 9 261 48 27 Average Queue (ft) 0 28 2 5 95th Queue (ft) 5 134 47 22 Link Distance (ft) 467 467 149 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 121 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ + Vii r Volume (vph) 1077 39 116 797 8 148 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1852 0 2006 1863 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1852 0 2006 1863 1770 1583 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1223 0 155 866 11 197 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 1223 908 5 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.75 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1329 987 7 11 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 679.2 705.7 2.7 3.7 524.5 307.6 474.3 Total Del /Veh (s) 69.5 71.6 81.1 1.2 850.2 43.5 50.0 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) Total Network Performance 0.0 691.5 729.8 0.1 0.1 402.8 0.3 110.8 0.4 280.8 632.0 48.0 Denied Del /Veh (s) 657.8 Total Del /Veh (s) 94.6 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB NB Directions Served TR L T L R Maximum Queue (ft) 354 37 57 92 120 Average Queue (ft) 242 27 43 37 69 95th Queue (ft) 618 42 59 107 146 Link Distance (ft) 466 42 42 149 149 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 49 17 54 6 22 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 495 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 25 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 67 54 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 534 63 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB EB WB WB SB Directions Served L T T R LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 4 485 479 74 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 296 241 19 95th Queue (ft) 4 4 637 628 73 Link Distance (ft) 42 467 467 149 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 53 48 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1093 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 WMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 - East End (Construction Completed) "First and Alone" Alternative • Sketch • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj —f Lead —hip I"First and Alone" Alternative N T4V NrS ��Y �cc�ss 9 To �- eT A a dfs, 4 3 A, I r v Vzly �p3�ih A;-.-"" e.:p .... V ekle!-e fc c e rJ an (aN e 41yeTweeA ,:I'ri v e t.-dy-Y /V r+ d vy o%Q a s.%� J'Q IV a aT K r e �r1 Qr VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 9/30/2014 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 Lane Group EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft Zi tt Volume (vph) 607 0 215 47 921 16 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.891 Flt Protected 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1643 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1643 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 200 300 200 Travel Time (s) 5.5 8.2 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 660 0 234 51 1001 17 70 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 660 0 0 285 1001 87 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 9/30/2014 --I. .4--- t /o. II i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r Volume (vph) 0 647 239 0 1179 57 0 0 72 7 0 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.993 0.865 0.955 Flt Protected 0.968 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 1722 0 Flt Permitted 0.968 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 1722 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 300 380 200 200 Travel Time (s) 8.2 10.4 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 703 260 0 1282 62 0 0 78 8 0 4 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 703 260 0 1344 0 0 0 78 0 12 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del /Veh (s) 0.3 4.9 5.3 0.3 45.8 16.4 1.9 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBL SBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 3.5 16.4 4.7 0.5 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.2 Total Del /Veh (s) 2.8 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 1 8/18/2014 Intersection: 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Movement EB EB WB NB Directions Served T T UL LR Maximum Queue (ft) 5 3 116 126 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 54 48 95th Queue (ft) 4 3 93 95 Link Distance (ft) 168 168 Queuing Penalty (veh) 125 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement B203 NB SB Directions Served T R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 11 70 34 Average Queue (ft) 0 29 9 95th Queue (ft) 7 55 31 Link Distance (ft) 92 114 126 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative Lanes, Volumes, Timings 9/30/2014 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 Lane Group EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft tt Volume (vph) 1265 0 137 75 987 4 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.872 Flt Protected 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1619 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1619 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 200 300 200 Travel Time (s) 5.5 8.2 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 1375 0 149 82 1073 4 75 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1375 0 0 231 1073 79 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out f "First and Alone" Alternative 9/30/2014 --I. .4--- t /o. II i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r Volume (vph) 0 1288 183 0 1189 85 0 0 186 22 0 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.990 0.865 0.958 Flt Protected 0.967 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 1726 0 Flt Permitted 0.967 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 1726 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 300 380 200 200 Travel Time (s) 8.2 10.4 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1400 199 0 1292 92 0 0 202 24 0 11 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1400 199 0 1384 0 0 0 202 0 35 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del /Veh (s) 0.4 13.3 14.7 0.3 139.6 34.6 2.6 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBL SBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 9.1 19.4 6.3 1.1 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.3 Total Del /Veh (s) 4.1 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 Intersection: 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Movement EB EB WB NB B105 Directions Served T T UL LR T Maximum Queue (ft) 8 11 139 153 26 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 71 55 2 95th Queue (ft) 5 7 122 125 24 Link Distance (ft) 168 168 125 72 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 5 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement B203 B203 NB SB Directions Served T T R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 16 18 127 61 Average Queue (ft) 1 1 59 21 95th Queue (ft) 8 8 103 51 Link Distance (ft) 92 92 114 126 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 WMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 — Build -out Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting. LLG VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 � � i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r r Volume (vph) 0 654 239 0 1179 57 0 0 72 0 0 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 500 200 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 13.6 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 711 260 0 1344 0 0 0 78 0 0 12 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out SimTraffic Performance Report 7/31/2014 2: VVMC Access /TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.3 2.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 Total Del /Veh (s) 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.4 2.9 4.4 0.6 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 1.0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access /TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement NB SB Directions Served R R Maximum Queue (ft) 55 33 Average Queue (ft) 23 10 95th Queue (ft) 44 34 Link Distance (ft) 146 160 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 � � i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r r Volume (vph) 0 1310 183 0 1189 85 0 0 186 0 0 32 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 500 200 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 13.6 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1424 199 0 1384 0 0 0 202 0 0 35 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out SimTraffic Performance Report 7/31/2014 2: VVMC Access /TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.4 2.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 Total Del /Veh (s) 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6 8.2 4.7 1.1 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 1.7 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access /TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement WB NB SB Directions Served TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 4 124 48 Average Queue (ft) 0 51 22 95th Queue (ft) 4 95 49 Link Distance (ft) 472 146 160 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] Year 2014 — Existing Condition Year 2017 — East End (During Construction) Tu rn Key Consulting. LLC superior Projec't I— d-ship WMC Master Plan TIS Year 2014 - Existing Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj —f Lead —hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 28 7 3 1 10 1 1 60 1 1 143 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1116 0 Flt Permitted 0.965 0.996 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1116 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. ( # /hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 41 0 0 13 0 0 67 0 0 227 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 Total Del /Veh (s) 6.5 9.3 7.9 9.0 8.5 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 9.8 AM Peak Hour SirnTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Intersection: 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 65 68 67 122 Average Queue (ft) 24 14 33 55 95th Queue (ft) 53 50 56 93 Link Distance (ft) 384 491 466 426 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 123 10 9 2 18 4 4 151 2 4 103 88 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1093 0 Flt Permitted 0.959 0.996 0.999 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1093 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. ( # /hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 155 0 0 26 0 0 170 0 0 212 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 Total Del /Veh (s) 10.5 10.2 12.0 10.4 10.9 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 12.1 PM Peak Hour SirnTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Intersection: 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 136 79 131 131 Average Queue (ft) 54 26 55 56 95th Queue (ft) 99 70 100 96 Link Distance (ft) 384 491 466 426 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 WMC Master Plan TIS Year 2017 - East End (During Construction) • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj —f Lead —hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 --1. .4--- t II i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 30 7 3 1 10 1 1 61 1 1 145 80 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1109 0 Flt Permitted 0.964 0.996 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1109 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. ( # /hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 44 0 0 13 0 0 68 0 0 246 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 Total Del /Veh (s) 6.9 9.5 7.8 9.9 9.2 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 9.8 AM Peak Hour SirnTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Intersection: 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 38 48 43 96 Average Queue (ft) 23 18 35 63 95th Queue (ft) 50 56 54 114 Link Distance (ft) 384 491 466 426 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 --1. .4--- t II i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 128 10 9 2 18 4 4 153 2 4 105 95 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1091 0 Flt Permitted 0.958 0.996 0.999 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1091 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. ( # /hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 160 0 0 26 0 0 172 0 0 221 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 Total Del /Veh (s) 10.4 9.2 11.5 10.6 10.7 Total Network Performance Denied Del /Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 12.0 PM Peak Hour SirnTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Intersection: 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 116 81 114 129 Average Queue (ft) 54 24 53 59 95th Queue (ft) 94 66 89 101 Link Distance (ft) 384 491 466 426 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 WMC Master Plan TIS FHU Memo Regarding Proposed Roundabout TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj —f Lead —hip FELSBURG � HOLT & ULLEVIG ... conneceing and enhancing ccrmmuniGies August 1, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, Town of Vail FROM: Chris Fasching SUBJECT: Evergreen, VVMC, Municipal Center Roundabout FHU Reference 14 -236 Introduction Various redevelopments are being considered along both sides of the South Frontage Road west of the Main Vail roundabout. One area includes the Municipal Center in which the existing eastern Municipal Center building would remain, but the western building would be replaced with a parking structure. Across the South Frontage Road, Evergreen and the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) are contemplating redevelopment as well. This memorandum specifically explores the nuances of various access schemes with respect to a roundabout intersection serving these uses. It is already anticipated that the roundabout would need to two lanes to function (and this analysis confirms that notion). Traffic Projections Peak hour traffic projections used in the analysis were developed from the long term projections from the latest travel demand model runs which were made in support of planning and design for the 1 -70 underpass project near Simba Run. Further, available peak hour trip generation estimates associated with a potential Evergreen redevelopment and of a VVMC expansion have been accounted. The parking structure was assumed to contain 325 spaces in which one -half would be associated with a directional peak hour trip (inbound in the morning and outbound in the evening). Table 1 shows the various trip- making components and their assumed peak hour trip generation. These serve as the basis for analysis in assessing varying access scenarios. The VVMC has the potential of generating the greatest amount of traffic of the three uses, although the impact could end up being less than that shown. It should be noted that the estimates shown in Table 1 are rough at this point as the character and scale of each redevelopment is still evolving. 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 801111 tel ')03,7_11.1440 fax 303.721.0832 W M.fl- ueng.coni info flzuenk.conn August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 2 Table 1 Peak Hour Traffic Components and Trip Estimates ** * AM (PM) Peak hour in vehicles per hour. * *Through traffic along the Frontage Road used in this was based on latest travel demand model run in support of 1 -70 Underpass project. Access Alternatives A design charette, held July 16, 2014 in Vail, resulted in three fundamental alternatives to be analyzed; each has a sub - option as well. The primary alternatives locate the roundabout in a slightly different location along the Frontage Road, and the sub - options pertain to adjustments in access locations. The exception is Alternative 3a in which parcel access is the same as Alternative 3, but the roundabout is replaced with a U -turn bulb -out instead. Each alternative has been conceptually laid out and shown at the end of this memo. One of the constraints in locating the roundabout is to ensure it does not cross the 1 -70 barrier line. Traffic Operations Sidra software was used to assess the operational aspects of a roundabout via calculating Level of Service (LOS). The analysis first assessed whether any form of a one -lane roundabout might suffice; it won't. A full two -lane roundabout is needed given the traffic numbers in Table 1. This was found to be the case for all the alternatives analyzed; two lanes are needed and would be sufficient even for those in which U- turning traffic would add demand. Further, two -lanes will be required along the Frontage Road approaches into the roundabout to achieve at least a LOS C under ideal conditions (actually, LOS B is achieved in every case). The one nuance revealed by the roundabout analysis pertains to the traffic queues that could form upon entering the roundabout. Specifically, the WB Frontage Road approach was found to potentially queue back past the parking structure entrance in Alternative 1 (more -so in Alternative 1a). This suggests that driveway access points onto the Frontage Road (that do not directly connect into the roundabout) should be located at least 125 feet from the roundabout along its entry leg. A sub - option in several of the alternatives pertains to the provision of a left -in to the VVMC. The analysis suggests that this left in movement could operate at LOS B with queues that could be accommodated in a 100 -foot lane. All the alternatives would allow flexibility in the event that this left -in movement exceeds the projection; the downstream roundabout would have excess capacity to accommodate it in the form of a U -turn. Comparisons Table 2 shows a matrix that simply highlights nuances and a few differences between the alternatives. Inbound* Outbound* Component From West From East TO West TO East VVMC 24 (50) 217 (150) 11 (10) 64 (192) Evergreen Lodge 12 (25) 47 (75) 16 (4) 64 (69) Parking Structure 40 (15) 125 (40) 10 (40) 25 (125) * AM (PM) Peak hour in vehicles per hour. * *Through traffic along the Frontage Road used in this was based on latest travel demand model run in support of 1 -70 Underpass project. Access Alternatives A design charette, held July 16, 2014 in Vail, resulted in three fundamental alternatives to be analyzed; each has a sub - option as well. The primary alternatives locate the roundabout in a slightly different location along the Frontage Road, and the sub - options pertain to adjustments in access locations. The exception is Alternative 3a in which parcel access is the same as Alternative 3, but the roundabout is replaced with a U -turn bulb -out instead. Each alternative has been conceptually laid out and shown at the end of this memo. One of the constraints in locating the roundabout is to ensure it does not cross the 1 -70 barrier line. Traffic Operations Sidra software was used to assess the operational aspects of a roundabout via calculating Level of Service (LOS). The analysis first assessed whether any form of a one -lane roundabout might suffice; it won't. A full two -lane roundabout is needed given the traffic numbers in Table 1. This was found to be the case for all the alternatives analyzed; two lanes are needed and would be sufficient even for those in which U- turning traffic would add demand. Further, two -lanes will be required along the Frontage Road approaches into the roundabout to achieve at least a LOS C under ideal conditions (actually, LOS B is achieved in every case). The one nuance revealed by the roundabout analysis pertains to the traffic queues that could form upon entering the roundabout. Specifically, the WB Frontage Road approach was found to potentially queue back past the parking structure entrance in Alternative 1 (more -so in Alternative 1a). This suggests that driveway access points onto the Frontage Road (that do not directly connect into the roundabout) should be located at least 125 feet from the roundabout along its entry leg. A sub - option in several of the alternatives pertains to the provision of a left -in to the VVMC. The analysis suggests that this left in movement could operate at LOS B with queues that could be accommodated in a 100 -foot lane. All the alternatives would allow flexibility in the event that this left -in movement exceeds the projection; the downstream roundabout would have excess capacity to accommodate it in the form of a U -turn. Comparisons Table 2 shows a matrix that simply highlights nuances and a few differences between the alternatives. August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 3 Table 2 Roundabout Conceptual Design Options Matrix Alt. Description Notes Roundabout is located at the Roundabout will function at LOS B given ideal west end of the municipal center conditions. and would provide access into The parking structure would not be easily accessed 1 Evergreen. The parking from the west. structure would be accessed via Right -in /right out driveway from Parking Structure onto a right -in /right -out. The VVMC Frontage Road may be too close to the roundabout. would be provided a % access. Retaining wall likely needed along south and west sides of roundabout. Roundabout would serve more traffic than Alt. 1, but still operate at LOS B given ideal conditions. The parking structure would not be easily accessed from the west. Roundabout is located in same EB approaching traffic into roundabout would stack past location as described above. to the Parking Structure right -in /right -out; this is more 1a The VVMC would be served via critical in 1a than in 1. a right -in /right out only, other Emergency vehicles entering from the east would have than emergency traffic which a clear turn lane. could turn left into the facility. Retaining wall likely needed along south and west sides of roundabout. Possible driver expectancy issues in forcing lefts through roundabout; significant advance signage needed. Roundabout is shifted to the east (in the vortex are related to Roundabout will function at LOS B given ideal new helipad site), located conditions. roughly mid -point of the Smooth parking structure entry operations would be 2 Evergreen frontage. The required to preclude queuing into roundabout. parking structure would access directly into roundabout, and VVMC would be served via a % access. Roundabout is located in the Roundabout LOS would be A given ideal conditions. same location as described Patterns through the roundabout would be simpler 2a above. The right -in to the compared to 2 (no longer accommodating an EB left parking structures is shifted to nor a WB right). the east out of the roundabout. The parking structure will not be easily accessed from the west. August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 4 Summary A two -lane roundabout will function at LOS B in ideal conditions for any of the alternatives considered. Sensitivity to access placement is needed for some alternatives such that driveways are not too close to the entry legs of the roundabout and end up being blocked at peak times. Property owners should evaluate the constraints and opportunities with respect to their needs of redevelopment towards developing a balanced solution. This memo provides additional fodder in support of additional consideration and discussion. Roundabout would function at a LOS B in ideal conditions. Roundabout is located to the May defy driver expectation given that there would not west up against Middle Creek be any kind of cross street connecting to roundabout. and is used to serve WB to EB The parking structure will not be easily accessed from u -turns (which includes left -in the west. Roundabout could also be used for EB to WB U- turns, 3 traffic for Evergreen, left -in traffic perhaps those exiting the Lionshead parking structure for VVMC, and left -out traffic desiring travel west; a right turn followed by a U -turn from parking structure). No may be easier than a left turn at peak times. direct access would be provided This option could incorporate an emergency left -in lane via the roundabout. for VVMC and /or a left -in lane to Evergreen. Retaining wall needed along south side of roundabout. Potential headwall /wing -wall work pertaining to Middle Creek. The U -turn traffic will operate at LOS C in ideal conditions, but this approach lane could see 250 -foot queues during the PM peak hour (reduced to 150 feet Roundabout is replaced with a +/- if a left -in is allowed at VVMC). This could be formal U -turn "bulb -out" area, challenging for parking structure traffic exiting that 3a which would be located in facility and needing to complete several lane changes approximately the same location in a relative short distance. as the roundabout in Alternative This option could incorporate an emergency left -in lane 3. for VVMC and /or a left -in lane to Evergreen. Retaining wall needed on south side of roundabout. Potential headwall /wing -wall work pertaining to Middle Creek. Summary A two -lane roundabout will function at LOS B in ideal conditions for any of the alternatives considered. Sensitivity to access placement is needed for some alternatives such that driveways are not too close to the entry legs of the roundabout and end up being blocked at peak times. Property owners should evaluate the constraints and opportunities with respect to their needs of redevelopment towards developing a balanced solution. This memo provides additional fodder in support of additional consideration and discussion. i / / I V // i r z O CL O 61 CAL, Aff 4w raw v , / a 10 / N cz s cz cli 4 I II � ! I L X I CLCAW v � in co / y LO N M p ` cli go x ` m a f CN ca z 0 F-- CL 0 I To U) Cf) LO C0) CV (z cli o�l co go f, top, I i I ir I yy 4� 99 0 � p9 a V w— • 4it ieiif o � //� a F °`� g of (n w ��i ",iii 0 TOWN OF VAIL " Memorandum To: VVMC From: Public Works Department Date: October 8, 2014 Subject: VVMC Traffic & Loading Delivery Comments Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan - Traffic Impact Study After review of the Traffic Volume Development report for the Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan dated September 30, 2014; we offer the following notes and comments for confirmation /clarification and discussion; • The trip generation is based on # of parking spaces and existing count data; not based on ITE use categories. How does this generation number compare with ITE trip generation? • It should be noted that the -50 +% discrepancy in volumes between VVMC counted traffic and the VTMP counted volumes for existing traffic can easily be explained since the VVMC traffic counts were done midweek and the Frontage Road sees significantly more volume on the weekends with skier traffic. • With a right turn in volume of 239, the right turn required decel lane may be +/- 240'; how will this be accommodated in the Roundabout or in the "First In and Alone" scenarios. • The First In and Alone scenario seems potentially problematic; • the left -in only for emergency vehicles will be difficult to control, • the U -turn movement for 200+ vehicles at peak hour will be difficult to enforce /manage, • the U -turn will be difficult to design and sign within the ROW, where is this U -turn proposed to be located? Both the Roundabout and First In and Alone scenarios need to be vetted more in design to understand if they are feasible and approvable. It will also be important to get CDOT's input on whether these solutions will be approvable in CDOTs ROW. If it is determined neither are feasible or approvable what it the next option? On -site circulation will be critical for this amount of traffic entering off the Frontage Road. This should be vetted in more detail. Ad Name: 10627938A PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Customer: TOWN OF VAIL /PLAN DEPT /COMM October 13, 2014 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33 75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT 7777 T ■ -�y Site Visit LNone Vail 120 minutes 1.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Vail Valley Medical PROOF OF PUBLICATION Center Master Plan, to establish a comprehensive redevelopment plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center, Lot 10 (Town of Vail parking lot), and US Bank Building, located at 181 and 281 West Mead- ow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West/ Lots STATE OF COLORADO } E, 10 i F, and 0 Val Village Filing 2, and Lot D -2, A Resobdi 1t Lot D Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (P EC Valley Medical Center, represented Applicant: resented }Q��77s . by Braun enVail Associates Planner: Warren Campbell COUNTY OF EAGLE } ACTION: MOTION: SECOND:VOTE: 15 minutes 2.A request for a final review of a variance from Sections 12 -6C -6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pur- I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified Code'to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition within the l side setback area, located at 4394 Stream side Cir- representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper cle Unit B /Lot 9, Bighorn Subdivision 4th Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. printed, in whole or in part and published in the County (PEC140035) Applicant: Don & Kathy Vestal, represented by Custom Mountain Architects of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: therein; that said newspaper has been continuous) CONDITION(S): published p Y 45 minutes and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of 3.A request for the review of a development plan, pursuant to Section 12 -8E -6, Development Plan, Vail Town Code and a conditional use permit, pur- more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first suant to Section 12 -8E -3, Conditional Use, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Ski and Snowboard Vail Club Vail site with a new publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and private and public club and multi- family residential dwelling units, located at 598 Vail Valley Drive /Part that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140020, PEC140023) and advertisement as requested. Applicant: Ski and Snowboard Club Vail, repre- sented Braun and Associates Planner: : J onathan Spence ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium CONDITION(S): 1, minutes request for the review of a final plat, pursuant , only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado to to Chapter 13 -4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Town allow for the re- subdivision of Parcel 1 of the Golden Peak Ski Base And Recreation District Rule Parcel and Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, in provision. order to establish Parcel 3, Golden Peak Ski Base And Recreation District Parcel, the redevelopment site for Ski and Snowboard Club Vail, located at 460 and 598 Vail Valley Drive /Parcel 1, Golden That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was Peak Ski Base and Recreation lng District , Parcel, ting Part STract B, Vail Village 7, and el, an forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140021) published in the regular and entire issue of every Applicant: Ski and Snowboard Club Vail and Vail Corporation, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence number of said daily newspaper for the period of I ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said CONDITION(S): request for a recommendafion to the Vail Town notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 10/10/2014 and Co Council i ri major , Casca a t'o Special Deveo opment District No. Cascade Village, pursuant A it Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail that the last dated 10/10/2014 Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved publication of said notice was development plan for the Cornerstone site to in the issue of said newspaper. facilitate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive/Unplatted, (Liftside /Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140019) Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates In I have here m hand this day, Planner: Jonathan Spence witness whereof, unto set Y Y ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 10/13/2014. MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 6.A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12 -9C -3, Conditional Uses, to allow for improvements to a public park and active outdoor recreation area, facility, and use (restroom and picnic pavilion) on the Lower Bench of Ford Park, located at 530 South Frontage Road EasWnplatted(Ford Park), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140024) General Man ager/Publisher/Editor Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Greg Hall Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 Vail Daily MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public in and for 7.A request for the review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review the C ounty of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 10/13/2014. Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the realignment of a shared property line resulting in no 1 net change in lot areas, located at 103 and 107 Rockledge Road /Lots 4 and 7, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140034) Applicant: Gary and Susan Rosenbach, by KH Webb Architects represented Planner: Joe Ba'c ACTION: Tabled to October 27, 2014 MOTION: SECOND ND:VOTE: 8.Approval of September 22, 2014 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public 9.Information Update My Commission expires: November 1, 2015 MOTION o MOTI: SEC ' SECON D: VOTE: The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community PRy p� Development Department. Times and order of ,....,•••e� �,.' • items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine atwhat time the :� T PAMELA J. Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for SCHUL -2 additional information. Sign language interpretation 9 �'$ is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department My Commissbn Published October 5, 2014 in the Vail Daily. Expires 1ll012915 (10627938)