Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-0323 PEC6� TOWN OF VAIL' PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION March 23, 2015 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 Site Visit: None 20 minutes A request for the review of a variance from Section 11-6-3: Business Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11-10, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for two business identification signs where one is permitted, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive Unit B (Lululemon Athletica Retail Store, Gore Creek Condominiums)/Tract A, Block 513, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC150008) Applicant: Lululemon Athletica, represented by Monte Park Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 120 minutes 2. A request for final review of an amendment to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12- 9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additional floor plate on the west wing, located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West (Vail Valley Medical Center)/Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, Lot 2E, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D, Vail Village Filing 2 (PEC150002, PEC150003) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun Associates Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 3. Approval of March 9, 2015 minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 4. Information Update 5. Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published March 20, 2015 in the Vail Daily. Page 1 TOWN OF Vari PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION March 23, 2015 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 Members Present Members Absent Webb Martin John Rediker Michael Kurz Henry Pratt Dick Cleveland Luke Cartin Pam Hopkins Site Visit: None 20 minutes A request for the review of a variance from Section 11-6-3: Business Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11-10, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for two business identification signs where one is permitted, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive Unit B (Lululemon Athletica Retail Store, Gore Creek Condominiums)/Tract A, Block 5B, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC150008) Applicant: Lululemon Athletica, represented by Monte Park Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Denied MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 7-0-0 Jonathan Spence delivered his presentation per Staff's memo. Commissioner Cleveland asked if the existing window sign complied with Town Code. Spence answered that it does. Monte Park offered comments regarding staff's presentation and in support of the applicant's position. Commission members spoke to their findings that the variance was not warranted based upon the review criteria. Commissioner Rediker stated his disapproval of the current sign code regulations with regard to the need to allow for situations such as that presented to be able to address visibility. 120 minutes 2. A request for final review of an amendment to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12- 9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additional floor plate on the west wing, located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West (Vail Valley Medical Center)/Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, Lot 2E, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D, Vail Village Filing 2 (PEC150002, PEC150003) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun Associates Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-1 (Cleveland recused) CONDITION(S): Page 1 "The following conditions/expectations will be included within the pre -development agreement between the Vail Valley Medical Center and the Town of Vail. That agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of a building permit for the West Wing. A finding has been made by the PEC to mitigate 100% of the employee generation created by this proposal off-site. The WMC shall submit a final Employee Housing Report (to determine employee generation rate and required mitigation) for review and approval by the PEC prior to submittal of a building permit application for the West Wing. 2. Due to the uncertainly of the potential Evergreen Lodge land exchange and the future of Lot 10 and how these factors could influence final decisions on the design of the WMC parking lot, WMC shall return to the PEC prior to construction of parking lot improvements reflected in this CUP application. The purpose of this review will be to present any changes to parking lot design and/or additional information regarding such improvements that may include but not be limited to: • Defining an access easement over WMC property for access to Town of Vail parking spaces, • Evaluation of appropriate setbacks between the WMC's westerly property line and west edge of parking lot with regard to requirements for screening, stream health, and snow storage, and • Town Council's formal approval of changes to Lot 10. 3. Prior to implementing changes to parking management (shifting patient/guest parking to East Structure and employee parking to West Lot), WMC shall obtain or provide to town staff. • Access permit approval from CDOT for interim South Frontage Road access improvements to both WMC and Town Hall site, • Town Council approval of improvements to Town Hall site, • Detailed design of interim access improvements, • Construction schedule demonstrating completion of improvements prior to November 1, 2015, • Plans for manual traffic control measures (if deemed necessary by the Town) until such time interim access improvements are in place, and • Plans for how parking changes will be implemented, to include but not limited to improved wayfinding on Campus and in immediate vicinity (road signs), outreach/education programs, role of valet/concierge, any physical improvements to East Structure. 4. WMC provides to town staff a lease for a minimum of 15 off-site parking spaces prior to the issuance of a building permit for the West Wing (to compensate for the 15 reduction to existing spaces from the re -design of the parking lot, until such time the East Wing is completed). Page 2 5. WMC provides staff with a lease for a minimum of 41 spaces prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the West Wing, (to compensate for the parking demand of the WW expansion, until such time the East Wing is completed) 6. WMC provides a construction management plan for review and approval by town staff prior to the issuance of building permit for the West Wing. 7. WMC provides a comprehensive roof plan as part of a DRB application depicting all rooftop mechanical devices and equipment and design features proposed to screen such devices and features. 8. WMC address outstanding Public Works comments prior to issuance of building permit: • Demonstrate valet parking conformance with Town Code and potential conflicts with valet spaces and truck turning movements. Any change to the number of valet parking spaces will directly affect the minimum number of required off- site parking spaces to be leased pursuant to Condition 4. • Provide a final drainage study, • Modify drainage plan to route clean groundwater (from de -watering system) separately from storm water. • Work with town staff to define the preferred location for the water quality vault. 9. WMC shall develop a plan for cleaning and restoring the bank of Middle Creek adjacent to the WMC site and proceed through the appropriate process for completion by November 1, 2015. 10. In conjunction with the Design Review Board application, the applicant shall provide a landscape plan that ensures the greatest amount of verticality and diversity amongst the plantings along West Meadow Drive so that the impact of bulk and mass to the neighborhood created by the West Wing expansion is adequately mitigated." Warren Campbell delivered his presentation per Staff's memo. Commissioner Kurz asked for details on the topic of mechanical screening. Campbell explained that the Code provisions for mechanical screen are in Title 14. Commissioner Rediker asked if screening is under the purview of the PEC. Campbell explained that the PEC should review the screening from a perspective of its impacts to the bulk, mass, and height of the structure and the DRB will review the materials and asthetics of the screening. Commissioner Rediker asked why some material in the applicant's memo was not included in Staff's memo. Campbell answered that it was in effort to avoid redundancy. Staff's memorandum spoke to those items of heightened importance and areas of concern, Rediker asked is all elements in the applicant's memo would be included in an approval. Page 3 Campbell answered yes, it was apart of the applicant's submittal and would become a part of the "contract" if a CUP were approved. Kurz asked if ensuring the completion of all phases of construction was under the PEC's purview. Campbell answered no. He added that the Town Council was working on a Developer Agreement to address Commissioner Cartin asked where in town employee housing exists upon a General Use zoned property. Campbell stated that out that Buzzard Park out at the Public Works and at Vail Fire Station No. 2. In the past there were EHUs at the library and Fire Stations 1 and 3 had some accommodations for resident fire fighters. Commissioner Cartin asked what triggers would be in place to ensure development of the East Wing. Campbell answered that those incentives and triggers would be included in the developer agreement. Tom Braun then delivered an overview of the presentation on behalf of the applicant. Russ Sedmak, architect, then presented the details of the streetscape improvements on West Meadow Dr., the proposed west fagade, and the how architectural detailing impacts the mass and bulk. Commissioner Hopkins asked for clarification on the proposed materials for the west and north facades. Sedmak explained the various materials and suggested a stucco finish might be used on the north expansion in order to lighten it up as compared to the metal panels shown. Braun then discussed each of the proposed conditions, starting with employees housing mitigation. Braun stated that the applicant would comply and have a competent proposal at the next PEC meeting. Braun then discussed conditions two and three (parking & traffic), speaking to lot design and trip generation. Off-site leased spaces, the construction management plan, and Public Works' comments were then discussed. Stream health was the next topic. Braun mentioned a number of steps would occur in order to ensure stream health. Commissioner Martin asked what the net gain/loss of parking would be in the long-term. Braun and Campbell stated it would increase to approximately 600 spaces from approximatl;ey 250. Commissioner Kurz asked if the 50 foot stream setback (Gore Creek) should be applied here. Campbell stated the 30 foot setback is what is currently codified for Middle Creek. Mery Lapin, resident of 232 West meadow Drive, addressed the PEC, speaking to stream health. Lapin felt the high-water mark was a more appropriate reference point for establishing a stream setback, rather than the stream centerline. He asked for more of a landscape buffer than what is being proposed. Lapin then spoke to the performance bond and the need for assurances that phases be completed. Lapin also spoke to the significance of Lot 10, the landscaping on Page 4 Meadow Drive, and snow -melting the sidewalk. Lot 10 needs to remain publicly owned, although interim use for parking and staging he was comfortable with. He asked that PEC not give preferential treatment to VVMC. Then Lapin asked for clarification on parking and where visitors would park. Dan Reynolds, attorney representing the Corrigans, residents of 252 West Meadow Drive, reiterated his client's concern about the building setback along West Meadow Drive. His clients asked that the utility screening along West Meadow Drive be given the appropriate consideration. Jim Lamont, Vail HOA, asked Pam Hopkins for background on the use of Lot 10 as she might have some knowledge based upon her history with the area (Architect of the Vail Library). Commissioner Hopkins recollected that it was acquired after the construction of the library. Lamont state that his point was that Lot 10, however it is ultimately used, be screened with a wall so that the pedestrian experience would not be compromised by the proposed parking lot. Lamont then made some recommendations for landscaping along West Meadow Drive. He also reiterated the need for snow -melting the sidewalk along West Meadow Drive. Commissioner Hopkins spoke to the need to heat the sidewalks, preserve stream health, and introduce greater plant diversity for the landscaping. She asked how visitor parking was accommodated in the parking calculations. She thought there needed to be more of a nod to those arriving to the hospital by means other than car. Braun responded that he felt there may be some confusion between parking generation and parking management. The methodology contained within the VVMC MP accounted for visitor parking. Cartin spoke to the significance of employee housing mitigation and that perhaps the first condition should be modified to require some employee housing on site. Cartin spoke to the land exchange component and need to have foresight in regards to the development of the Evergreen site. He felt parking management during the sequencing of the redevelopment had been adequately addressed. Cartin asked for specifics on construction staging and where contracotrs would be parking. Braun said that the selected contractor was aware of the site constraints and was exploring options. Commissioner Cartin stated that he supported the idea presented by Public Works to locate the sand and oil separator in a location permitting several other West Meadow Drive inlets to be connected to the device. Relocation of the existing trees should be explored and the inclusion of significant landscaping to buffer the project needs to be discussed with the DRB. Commissioner Kurz felt the conditions proposed by staff were well thought out. He disagreed with Lamont's recommendation of a wall to screen parking. He suggested landscaping was more appropriate. He concluded by statin that he felt a finding could be made to mitigate employee housing off-site in its entirety. Commissioner Rediker generally agreed with the conditions set forth by Staff. He asked if the development plan was the same plan presented to Town Council. Page 5 Campbell asked for clarification as he felt Commissioner Rediker may be referring to the development agreement being reviewed by Town Council. Braun then mentioned some of the points within the development agreement. Commissioner Rediker asked if a condition regarding the need to execute the developer agreement. Campbell and Braun felt it was already addressed within the current conditions. Rediker expressed concern about the 100% off-site employee housing mitigation. He asked Nina Timm, housing coordinator, her thoughts on whether the employee mitigation should occur off site. Nina Timm stated that that direction would come from the PEC pursuant to the Code and the findings the PEC would need to make to allow for off site mitigation. Commissioner Rediker asked about the ability to screen the electrical transformer along West Meadow Drive. Commissioner Martin asked what times the employee shift changes occurred at the hospital and was curious if they might be occurring at the same peak times of skier guest arrival and departure and if this might affect the plan to relocate the new front door to the South Frontage Road. Braun answered explaining that staff shift times occur befor the morning and afternoon peaks generated by skier traffic. Commissioner Martin agreed with Hopkins that the north -south pedestrian connection be heated when it comes in with the East Wing. Martin had hoped the west wing would be set farther back. Martin thought greater efforts were needed with regard to the materials selection and application to help break up the north facade. Commissioner Kurz asked about the straw waddles that have been discussed as an immediate improvement that could be implemented to help protect Middle Creek stream health. Campbell stated they are temporary installations until permanent improvements can be made. . Commissioner Pratt was shocked that heating the sidewalk was even a discussion point and felt that it should be a given. Regarding the stream setback, he was comfortable with what was being proposed in the interim. He added that the PEC will have the opportunity to discuss the final design of the parking lot in conjunction with the East Wing review and if the Evergreen land swap occurs and the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan requires amendment. He supported a finding that the employee housing be mitigated off-site. Pratt proposed a condition regarding the need to have the DRB review the landscaping with the goal of increasing the verticality of the proposed vegetation. Pratt then spoke to a concern with the parking spaces as stripped in the WMC parking structure. He mentioned that he had asked Warren Campbell to visit the structure and ascertain compliance with parking space dimensions. Pratt asked if the west lot would have a control gate. Braun said, no, not in the short term, but would at the conclusion of the East Wing. The valet system currently in place would be used to prevent the general public from parking there to address Pratt's concern with poaching for skier parking. Page 6 Pratt then asked how the proposed parking would be impacted if the land exchange did not occur. Pratt felt any screening for the parking would be the Town's obligation since Lot 10 is owned by the TOV. Campbell reported out to the Commission that he had visited the parking structure at the request of Commissioner Pratt. He stated that there were a number of non-compliant parking spaces. Many were approximately 6 inches short of compliant widths. He suggested that smaller parking spaces be signed as compact spaces. Commissioner Cartin suggested that a valet solution may be appropriate for the garage parking as well. Commissioner Rediker asked if parking space standards are laid out in the Town Code. Campbell stated that the dimensions are contained within the Code. Commissioner Rediker asked if the conditions need to speak to the parking space standards that are called for in the Town Code. Braun proposed an assessment of the existing parking space dimensions. Commissioner Pratt stated that a resolution and discussion of the minutia was not necessary so long as all parties would look into solutions as the parking can become tight within the structure. The Commission agreed that staff and the applicant could resolve the parking space concerns within the structure as it would be an interim situation that would be eliminated with the East Wing.. 3. Approval of March 9, 2015 minutes MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 7-0-0 4. Information Update 5. Adjournment MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-0 (Cleveland absent) The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published March 20, 2015 in the Vail Daily. Page 7 Ad Name: 11007611 A Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM Your account number is- 1 OP2P33 Vail Daily PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO } }SS. COUNTY OF EAGLE } I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice and advertisement as requested. The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium, only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of I consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 3/6/2015 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 3/6/2015 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 03/06/2015. General Man ager/Publisher/Editor Vail Daily Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 03/06/2015. � 2M 4,& 9. -V-� Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public My Commission expires: November 1, 2015 �pRY PUe/ ' PAMELA J. SCHULTZ 9�� COt-SRP$ My Commismn Expires 11/0112015 THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on March 23, 2015 at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. A request for the review of a variance from Section 11-6-3: Business Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11-10, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for two business identification signs where one is permitted, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive Unit B (Lululemon Athletica Retail Store, Gore Creek Condominiums)/Tract A, Block 5B, Vail Vil- lage Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC150008) Applicant: Lululemon Athletica, represented by Monte Park Planner: Jonathan Spence The applications and information about the propos- als are available for public inspection during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Develop- ment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend site visits. Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon re- quest, with 24-hour notification. Please call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im- paired, for information. Published March 6, 2015 in the Vail Daily. (11007611) Ad Name: 11041676A PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM March 5 CHAMBERS/ TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS/ UNCI Your account number is- 1OP2P33 PUBLIC WELCOME 75S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 Site Visit: None Vail Daily 20 minutes 1.A request for the review of a variance from Sec- tion 11-6-3: Business Signs, Vail Town Code, pur- PROOF OF PUBLICATION suant to Chapter 11-10, Variances, Vail Town code, to allow for two business identification signs where one is permitted, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive Unit B (Lululemon Athletica Retail Store, STATE OF COLORADO } Gore Creek Condominiums)/Tract A, Block 5B, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in re- gard thereto. (PEC 150008) lss Applicant: Lululemon Athletica, represented by II Monte Park COUNTY OF EAGLE } Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 1, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified 120 minutes 2.A request for final review of an amendment to a representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an printed, in whole or in part and published in the County existing healthcare facility, amending the develop - ment plan to allow for an additional floor plate on of Ea le, State of Colorado, and has a eneral circulation g g the west wing, located at 181 West Meadow Drive and South Frontage Road West Vail Valley Mediccalal Center)/Lots E, F, 10 Vail Village Fil- therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and ing 2, Lot 2E, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D, Vail Village Fil- and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of ing 2 (PEC150002, PEC150003) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first by Braun Associates Planner: Warren Campbell publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and ACTION: MOTION: VOTE: N(S)ECOND: that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice 3.Approval March 9, 2015 and advertisement as requested. of minutes MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 4.Information Update The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium, 5.Adjournment MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home The applications and information about the propos- Rule rOV1SlOn. als are available for public inspection during regu- lar office hours at the Town of Vail Community De- li velopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orienta- tion and the site visits that precede the public That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was hearing in the Town of Vail Community Develop - ment Department. Times and order of items are published in the regular and entire issue of every approximate, subject to change, and cannot be re- lied upon to determine at what time the Planning number of said dailynewspaper for the period of I h and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional in - consecutive insertions; and that the first ublication of said P formation. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Im- notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 3/20/2015 and (970) paired, for information. that the last publication of said notice was dated 3/20/2015 in Community Development Department Published March 20, 2015 in the Vail Daily. the issue of said newspaper. (11041676) In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 03/20/2015. General Man ager/Publisher/Editor Vail Daily Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 03/20/2015. � 2M 4,& 9. -V-� Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public My Commission expires: November 1, 2015 �pRY PUe/ ' PAMELA J. SCHULTZ 9�� COt-SRP$ My Commismn Expires 11/0112015 0. )TOWN OF VAII Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 23, 2015 SUBJECT: A request for the review of a variance from Section 11-6-3: Business Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11-10, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for two business identification signs where one is permitted, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive Unit B (Lululemon Athletica Retail Store, Gore Creek Condominiums)/Tract A, Block 5B, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC150008) Applicant: Lululemon Athletica, represented by Monte Park Planner: Jonathan Spence SUMMARY The applicant, Lululemon Athletica, represented by Monte Park, is requesting a variance from Section 11-6-3: Business Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11- 10, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for two business identification signs where one is permitted, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive, Unit B. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends denial, of this application, subject to the findings noted in Section VIII of this memorandum. A vicinity map (Attachment A), photographs (Attachment B) and the applicants' request (Attachment C), are attached for review. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant, Lululemon Athletica, represented by Monte Park, is requesting a sign variance to allow for two business identification signs where one is permitted. Specifically, the applicant requests the business be permitted two, six (6) square foot signs to be located on the business frontage with one sign being a blade style projecting sign and the other a wall sign (existing). Per Section 11-6-3: Business Signs, first floor/street level businesses shall be allowed one business identification sign per public entrance. The subject property is a first floor/street level commercial space of approximately 1,500 SF currently occupied by Lululemon Athletica. The space is located adjacent to the Slifer Designs @ Nina McLemore retail store to the west and the Sweet Basil Restaurant to the east. Please see the vicinity map and accompanying photos, included as Attachments A and B, respectively. III. BACKGROUND Lululemon Athletica began operating out of the subject property in 2012. At that time, Lululemon Athletica applied for and received staff approval for a two (2) square foot blade -style projecting sign (DRB120302). Subsequently, the applicant applied for and received staff approval for the replacement of the blade sign with a five (5) square foot wall sign (DRB140474). The use, Retail Store, is a permitted use on the first floor/street level in the Commercial Core I Zone District. This space was formerly occupied by The Englishman, an antique and fine furnishings store. IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff believes that following provisions of the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Town Code are relevant to the review of this proposal: Vail Village Master Plan (in part) Goal #1 Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving unique architectural scale of the village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. Objective 2.2: Recognize the importance of Vail Village as a mixed use center of activities for our guests, visitors and residents. Title 11, Sign Re_-gulations, Vail Town Code (in part) 11-1-2: PURPOSE: A. General Purpose. These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town of Vail and to promote the coordinated and harmonious design and placement of signs in the town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. Town of Vail Page 2 B. Specific Purpose. These regulations are intended to achieve the following specific purposes.- 1. urposes. 1. To describe and enable the fair and consistent enforcement of signs in the town of Vail. 2. To encourage the establishment of well designed, creative signs that enhance the unique character of Vail's village atmosphere. 3. To preserve a successful and high quality business environment that is aided by signs that identify, direct, and inform. 4. To aid in providing for the growth of an orderly, safe, beautiful, and viable community. 11-6-3: BUSINESS SIGNS: A. Business Identification Signs.- 1. igns. 1. Business identification signs in sign district 1 (SD I).- a. ). a. Number. Each business shall be allowed one business identification sign per public entrance. b. Area. The allowable area of each business identification sign shall be up to six (6) square feet. At the discretion of the design review board, a business identification sign for a bowling alley or movie theater may be up to fifteen (15) square feet in area, subject to the applicant demonstrating that the sign area is harmonious with the scale and architectural character of the subject business and the building in which it is located. c. Height. Projecting and awning signs shall have a minimum clearance of eight feet (8) above pedestrianways and a minimum clearance of fifteen feet (15) above vehicularways. No part of any business identification sign shall extend more than twenty five feet (25) above existing grade. d. Location. Business identification signs shall be located on the business frontage. e. Type Of Sign. Business identification signs shall not be freestanding. f. Businesses Not On The First Floor Or Street Level. Businesses not located on the first floor or street level shall be allowed only one projecting sign with a maximum area of four (4) square feet; location shall be subject to design review. Town of Vail Page 3 11-10-1: VARIANCES: A. Purpose. A variance from the sign regulations constitutes relief from the strict interpretation of the standards and may be granted by the planning and environmental commission (PEC) in cases where there exists a physical limitation that prevents the existence, placement, or operation of a sign in compliance with the standards of this title. B. Application Procedure. An application for a variance from the sign regulations may be obtained from the community development department. The variance application must include a sign permit application, the applicant's reasons for requesting a variance, and a nonrefundable fee determined by the town council as set forth by town ordinances. The staff shall set a date for a hearing before the planning and environmental commission once the complete application has been received. C. Criteria For Approval.- 1. pproval. 1. Special circumstances or conditions must exist that apply to the land, buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures, or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent right of way, that would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question. However, such circumstances must be unique to the subject site. 2. The applicant shall not have created the circumstances that have necessitated the variance request. 3. The applicant must demonstrate that the granting of the variance will be in general harmony with the purposes of this title. V. SITE ANALYSIS Address: 193 Gore Creek Drive (Gore Creek Plaza) Legal Description: Tract A, Block 5B, Vail Village Filing Zoning: Commercial Core 1 Land Use Plan Designation: Vail Village Master Plan Current Land Use: Mixed -Use Geological Hazards: None VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Existing Use Zoning District North: Town Streamtract Outdoor Recreation District South: Mixed -Use Commercial Core 1 East: Mixed -Use Commercial Core 1 West: Mixed -Use Commercial Core 1 Town of Vail Page 4 VII. REVIEW CRITERIA The review criteria for a variance request are prescribed in Chapter 11-10-1, Variances, Vail Town Code. 1. Special circumstances or conditions must exist that apply to the land, buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures, or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent right of way, that would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question. However, such circumstances must be unique to the subject site. In order for a sign variance to be granted, there must exist a physical limitation that prevents the existence, placement, or operation of a sign in compliance with the standards of the sign code. The applicant has asserted in their application that the activities on the adjacent properties, namely the outdoor dining deck at Sweet Basil and the landscape planter to the west, results in a unique situation where Lululemon Athletica's storefront is concealed. Staff is in agreement that building undulations along Gore Creek Drive result in a varying street edge. That being said, staff does not concur that this situation is unique but rather finds it quite common. Many businesses in the general vicinity have varying degrees of visual representation along Gore Creek Drive. These variations do not result in a unique situation, a required finding for the approval of a variance request. It should be noted that the built condition, with its inconsistent street edge, is a favorable condition explicitly desired by the Vail Village Master Plan and Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan. Therefore, staff finds that special circumstances warrantying relief from the provisions of the sign code governing the subject location do not exist. As such, this criterion is not met. 2. The applicant shall not have created the circumstances that have necessitated the variance request. The circumstances that have, according to the applicant, necessitated the variance request are the characteristics of the space. Per the applicant's written submittal, "Signage and representation along East Gore Creek Drive is extremely important when considering the visibility and success if retail establishments within the Vail Village Corridor. Due to the unfortunate location of our client's storefront (i.e. currently concealed behind the outdoor seating area and awning of the adjacent restaurant to the East (see image A) and further concealed by an alley -way and protruding planting bed to the West (see image 8), adequate representation by way of an additional projecting/blade sign is critical for survival. " (Images A and B can be found accompanying the applicant's submittal as Attachment C) Although the applicant has not created the circumstances that have necessitated the Town of Vail Page 5 request, staff finds that the circumstances do not meet the requirements for the granting of a variance, namely circumstances that are unique to the site. Therefore, staff finds that this criterion is not met. 3. The applicant must demonstrate that the granting of the variance will be in general harmony with the purposes of this title. The granting of the requested variance to allow two (2) signs where only one is permitted is not in general harmony with the general or specific purposes of Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town Code. Specifically, the approval would be inconsistent with the coordinated placement and fair and consistent enforcement of signage within the Town of Vail. The creation of an exception to the Title when there is not a unique circumstance is not in general harmony with the purposes of the Sign Regulations. The Town of Vail has established different sign districts within the Town to meet different purposes and intents. The number and size of allowable signage is directly correlated to the characteristics of the district. In the West Vail Commercial Area (Sign District #2), signs are both auto and pedestrian oriented, with allowable sign sizes commensurate with vehicle travel at rates exceeding 20 MPH, and the limited time afforded for sign viewing. In contrast, the Town Villages (Sign District #1) are pedestrian malls that allow extended opportunities for signage viewing due to the low speed of pedestrian movement (2-3 MPH). The allowance of signage in excess of what is appropriate for the characteristics of the particular sign district is not in keeping with the purpose of the sign regulations, specifically to encourage the establishment of well designed, creative signs that enhance the unique character of Vail's village atmosphere. Therefore, staff finds that this criterion is not met. • As an alternative to the variance request, staff has recommended to the applicant a combination of a blade style projecting sign and code -compliant window signage as a means of increasing the visibility of the retail store. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends denial of a variance from Section 11-6-3: Business Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11-10, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for two business identification signs where one is permitted, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive Unit B (Lululemon Athletica Retail Store, Gore Creek Condominiums)/Tract A, Block 513, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.. This recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: Town of Vail Page 6 "The Planning and Environmental Commission denies the applicants'request for a variance from Section 11-6-3. Business Signs, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 11-10, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for two business identification signs where one is permitted, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive Unit B (Lululemon Athletica Retail Store, Gore Creek Condominiums)/Tract A, Block 5B, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: 'Based upon a review of Section Vll of the March 23, 2015 staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds.- 1. inds. 1. No special circumstances or conditions exist that apply to the land, buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures, or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent right of way, that would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question. 2. The applicant has not demonstrated that the granting of the variance will be in general harmony with the purposes of this title. IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity map B. Photographs C. Applicant's submittal with photos Town of Vail Page 7 M -- Ism .. .�.. t � � .__i 1 t � � i AllA All ll � .. All .40 r iI' 1h s �t f � I L low � � f r r"� r R Hill PF _44 Al IA __11 r U A . ......... /jc if -verI frA AI 4o lj:: R A JONES SIGN Your Vision. Accomplish+. February 10, 2015 Town of Vail — Planning Department Attn: Jonathan Spence 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: Variance Request Lululemon Athletica 193 East Gore Creek Drive, Unit B (Parcel: 2101-082-1301-6) Project Summary: We are working with our client Lululemon Athletica (located at 193 East Gore Creek Drive, Unit B) to update existing business identification signage to include, the erection of one (1) 18" projecting/blade sign and one (1) 24" externally illuminated wall sign (see Sign Drawings, attached). Title 11, Chapter 6 of the Vail Town Code limits the number of business identification signs to one (1) per public entrance. As such, we are pursuing a Variance for the approval of a second business identification sign. Variance Request: Title 11-6-3A.1.a currently limits the number of business identification signs for each business to one (1) per public entrance. Our sign proposal for Lululemon Athletica includes a total of two (2) business identification signs. Consequently, we are seeking relief from the regulations of Title 11-6-3A.1.a by way of Title 11-10-1 (Variances). Statement of Justification: Signage and representation along East Gore Creek Drive is extremely important when considering the visibility and success of retail establishments within the Vail Village Corridor. Due to the unfortunate location of our client's storefront (i.e. currently concealed behind the outdoor seating area and awning of the adjacent restaurant to the East (see image A) and further concealed by an alley -way and protruding planting bed to the West (see image B)) adequate representation by way of an additional projecting/blade sign is critical for survival. It is our opinion that the granting of this variance would be, consistent with, and in general harmony with, the purpose of Title 11. Further, it is our opinion that the proposed signage would be consistent with existing business signage throughout Vail Village. Specifically, the business signage for "The COS BAR" (see image C) which includes two (2) business identification signs (awning and projecting/blade) and the business GREEN BAY PHILADELPHIA SAN DIEGO LAS VEGAS Project Management Fabrication Installation Repair & Maintenance Architectural Features JONES SIGN signage for "The North Face" (see image D) which includes one projecting three dimensional cube with a total of 3 sign faces. At this time, we ask the Commission to consider the potential impact of denying what is our client's only opportunity for adequate storefront representation within the Vail Village Corridor. Further, we ask the Commission to consider the importance of our client's visibility with regard to the many community events and free yoga classes offered to Town citizens and guests throughout the year. In closing, we respectfully request the Commission grant approval of the requested Variance. Respectfully, Imae, l/(/rp,.Ykvd Isaac Uitenbroek I Permit Coordinator PH: 920.425.9816 E: iuitenbroek(a�ionessign.com GREEN BAY PHILADELPHIA , SAN DIEGO , LAS VEGAS Project Management , Fabrication Installation - Repair & Maintenance - Architectural Features JONES SIGN Your Vision. Accomplished,. Image A: III Image B: N" GREEN BAY PHILADELPHIA , SAN DIEGO , LAS VEGAS Project Management , Fabrication Installation - Repair & Maintenance - Architectural Features JONES SIGN Your Vision. Accomplished,. Image D: GREEN BAY PHILADELPHIA , SAN DIEGO , LAS VEGAS Project Management , Fabrication Installation - Repair & Maintenance - Architectural Features JONES SIGN Your Vision. Accomplished,. Adjacent Properties (Per Eagle County Assessor's Office): Parcel Adjacent to the North: Address: "Vail Area" Owner's/Agent's Name: Town of Vail Owner's/Agent's Mailing Address: 75 S Frontage Rd W, Vail, CO 81657-5043 Parcel Adjacent to the South: Address: 174 Gore Creek Drive (The Lodge at Vail) Owner's/Agent's Name: Agent for HOA: Kursten Canada Owner's/Agent's Mailing Address: 0070 Benchmark Rd., Suite #104, Avon, CO 81620 Additional Mailing per Lodge Management: Jeff O'Brien, 174 East Gore Creek Drive, Vail, CO 81657 Parcel Adjacent to the East: Address: 201 Gore Creek Drive (Bell Tower Condominiums) Owner's/Agent's Name: Agent for HOA: Steve MacDonald (Vail Management Company) Owner's/Agent's Mailing Address: P.O. Box 6130 Avon, CO 81620 Parcel Adjacent to the West: Address: 183 Gore Creek Drive (Sitzmark Lodge) Owner's/Agent's Name: Sitzmark At Vail, Inc Attn: Geanne Fritch Owner's/Agent's Mailing Address: 183 Gore Creek Drive, STE 1, Vail, CO 81657-4544 GREEN SAY PHILADELPHIA , SAN DIEGO , LAS VEGAS Project Management , Fabrication Installation - Repair & Maintenance Architectural Features JONES SIGN Your Vision. Accomplished,. GREEN BAY PHILADELPHIA , SAN DIEGO , LAS VEGAS Project Management , Fabrication Installation - Repair & Maintenance - Architectural Features WO W Y Y � � Q O � z ='m i Sz� 5N J 0 ((:L�= N! m o >-�� a NY N Z N >W> N n _ O O� api O rj O O LO 7 Q x _Q o Q N WO W Y Y � � Q O � z ='m i Sz� 5N J 0 ((:L�= r V co W U) cc r_ ,,cc^ V! J i O z LL 0 O F— U) U d Y R O O U w J Z Q � W 0 co a C� 0 o � W 0 W D Z C) 0 W �5 cr (D U) zQ H0 U Z X 0 W J aD am c H U z coa 00- Z aZ p az wa O= U LU Q cr a M f I z O V D O a O LL H O z J z O H z W F z z W c cc O LL z a D _a �Y c 20Cl) >(D- N<- Cq W= O 08 a O ® N >�> N O W O C7 LO O 7 w 2 Q x o z N M f I z O V D O a O LL H O z J z O H z W F z z W c cc O LL z a D TOWN OFVAIL' Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 23, 2015 SUBJECT: A request for final review of an amendment to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additional floor plate on the west wing, located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West (Vail Valley Medical Center)/Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, Lot 2E, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D, Vail Village Filing 2 (PEC150002, PEC150003) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Warren Campbell I. SUMMARY The applicant, Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC), represented by Braun and Associates, is requesting a final review of an amendment to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additions on the West Wing of the existing facility located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road. Upon review of the applicable elements of the Town's planning documents and adopted criteria for review, the Community Development Department is recommending the Planning and Environmental Commission approve, with conditions, the applicant's request for an amended conditional use permit to facilitate the redevelopment of the West Wing of the VVMC. A complete summary of Staff's review is provided in Section VI of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST As was discussed during the VVMC MP review the hospital needs to remain operational during all sequences of the hospital redevelopment. The proposed West Wing expansion will allow for uses to begin to reconfigure, expand, consolidate, and relocate in anticipation of the East Wing redevelopment. The West Wing is the first in a sequence of improvements that will be proposed and constructed in order to implement the recommendations of the Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP). As proposed the West Wing redevelopment will comprise approximately 45,000 sf feet of floor area. More than 50% of the new floor area will be include within the new fourth floor to the West Wing. In conjunction with the expansion the applicant has prepared a strategy to maximize parking spaces on site in an interim condition to address parking losses and needs prior to the completion of the East Wing. The applicant has provided a written narrative describing the request in detail and responding to the criteria for review. The narrative addresses the changes to each level of the hospital, parking generation and needs, employee housing generation and mitigation, architecture, and building bulk, mass, and setbacks. The applicant's written narrative entitled, Vail Valley Medical Center West Wing Conditional Use Permit dated revised March 18, 2015, has been attached for reference (Attachment A). Additionally, the applicant has provided a document a set of plans dated March 12, 2015 (Attachment B). A copy of the adopted VVMC MP is attached to aid in the review of the proposed redevelopment for compliance with the CUP criteria (Attachment C). III. BACKGROUND The West Wing of the VVMC is located upon a parcel zoned General Use (GU) District. Within the GU District the PEC, in conjunction with the review of the CUP, shall prescribe the following development categories. 1. Lot area and site dimensions. 2. Setbacks. 3. Building height. 4. Density control. 5. Site coverage. 6. Landscaping and site development. 7. Parking and loading. The most recent amendment to the healthcare facility conditional use permit for the hospital occurred in May of 2001 when the Central Wing expansion was approved. The 2001 approval was an amendment to the February 1989 conditional use permit which resulted in the West Wing as it is known today. The current request to expand the West Wing is an amendment to the conditional use permit approved in May of 2001. On January 26, 2015, the PEC, by a unanimous vote of 5-0-1 (Cleveland recused, Cartin absent): Town of Vail Page 2 Forwarded a recommendation of approval, with modifications, with regard to the adoption of Resolution No. 3, Series of 2015, making the VVMC MP an element of the Vail Land Use Plan; and • Forwarded a recommendation of approval, with regard to the adoption of Resolution No. 4, Series of 2015, amending the Vail Land Use Plan to establish the VVMC MP land use category and designate it on the Plan Map. On February 23, 2015, the PEC held a work session to discuss the West Wing CUP application. At the hearing the primary focus was on the proposed changes to the building bulk, mass, setbacks, architecture and height. The PEC provided numerous comments highlighting the need to articulate the fagade, address the impacts of the proposed south expansion upon the pedestrian sidewalk and street, a need to provide increased landscaping, and alter material application such as glazing. On March 9, 2015, the PEC held a work session to follow up on building bulk, mass, setbacks, architecture and height and introduce employee housing generation and parking. In general the PEC felt the changes made to the south expansion in terms of articulation and application of materials was moving towards compliance. There were additional comments focusing on the west elevation of the hospital and the need to provide visual interest similar to the changes made to the south expansion. On March 17, 2015, the Vail Town Council adopted Resolutions Nos. 3 and 4, Series of 2015, making the VVMC MP a part of the Vail Comprehensive Plan and adopting a new land use designation for the VVMC citing the Master Plan as the guiding document for future redevelopment on the site. IV. SITE ANALYSIS /_�".CR��iE:Ti\�J[�i►�CxT'.C•hl�]'ilRa Legal Description: Lots E, and F Vail Village Filing 2 (Lot 10 was not included in this analysis) Existing Zoning: General Use Land Use Designation: Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan Mapped Geological Hazards: None Lot Area: Approximately 3.82 acres/ 166,269 square feet Development Standard General Use District Proposed Existing Minimum Lot Size Prescribed by PEC — Per No change approved development plan currently 3.82 acres/ 166,269 sf Town of Vail Page 3 Minimum Setbacks Prescribed by PEC - Per Front - 3.5 ft approved Development West - 23 ft Plan currently East - 16 ft Front - 22 ft Rear- 28 ft West - 40 ft East - 16 ft Rear - 28 ft Maximum Height Prescribed by PEC - Per 66.5 ft approved development plan currently 60 ft Density Control Not applicable Not applicable Units/acre and GRFA Site coverage Prescribed by PEC - Per 85,000 sf (51.1%) approved development plan currently 78,539 sf (47.2%) Minimum Landscaping Prescribed by PEC - Per 23,981 sf (14.4%) approved development plan currently 22,362 sf (13.4%) Required Parking Prescribed by PEC - Surface Lot - 91 spaces (7 valet)* Existing Structure - 103 spaces Surface Lot 112 spaces Structure 103 spaces The West Wing expansion results Total of 209 spaces in a required need of 62 parking Site deficient -175 spaces. spaces *The applicant's written narrative includes six (6) additional valet spaces in the loading berth for the WB -40 and larger trucks for a total of 13 valet spaces. Staff did not count these toward the total spaces provided. Town of Vail Page 4 V. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Existina Land Use North: Mixed use South: Residential East: Residential West: Streamtract VI. REVIEW CRITERIA Zoning District Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District Two -Family District High Density Multiple -Family Outdoor Recreation District Before acting on an amendment to conditional use permit application, the PEC shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. The proposed redevelopment of the VVMC campus is governed by the VVMC MP and Vail Town Code. The VVMC MP identifies the goals and implementation strategies to be employed to achieve a redevelopment in keeping with the development objectives of the town. There are a number of development objects contained within the VVMC MP. Within the VVMC MP (page 9) there is a list of 13 development objective the Town identified as needing to be addressed with any proposed redeployment on the campus. Those development objectives which are applicable to the West Wing sequence of the overall redevelopment are: 2. On-site loading and delivery facilities. Goal for Loading and Delivery — Design and manage loading and service facilities and functions to meet the needs of VVMC while at the same time minimizing potentially adverse impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood and on West Meadow Drive. The VVMC MP identifies the goal of fully enclosing the loading and delivery operations for the campus within the East Wing redevelopment sequence in order to minimize adverse impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood. The anticipated enclosed loading and delivery facility will be able to accommodate vehicles and their turning movements within the facility up to a SU -30. The majority of the vehicles delivering to the campus are SU -30 vehicles or smaller. However, there are deliveries from larger vehicles which cannot be accommodated within the anticipated East Wings facility. To accommodate these larger vehicles the design of the west parking lot includes a loading and delivery berth and a plan for the delivery of oxygen (Sheet C3 of Attachment B). The loading and delivery berth is located on the north side of the West Wing of the VVMC and is design to accommodate WB -40 vehicles (typ. beverage delivery vehicles). Additionally, the west parking lot has been designed to Town of Vail Page 5 accommodate the less frequent WB -62 which comes to the site. Vehicles included in the WB -62 classification include the mobile MRI trailer which is used when an MRI on site is being serviced/upgraded/or replaced. Also include in this classification are the trucks which bring replacement mattresses to the site and mobile mammography. As this size of vehicle comes to the site on an infrequent basis and stays for a limited period of time (a couple days) the applicant shows that this vehicle will be accommodated in the north row of parking spaces. Having these vehicles park in this location does have a negative impact on parking when in place. While a mattress truck can be scheduled to occur during times of lower parking demand, the MRI and mobile mammography trailers will be on the site for a period of time rendering the parking spaces unavailable. Staff has identified this as a concern, however, it has been demonstrated that these occurrences are infrequent and can be managed in the interim redevelopment prior to the East Wing. During the review of the East Wing and the determination of the quantity of parking to be included within the structure the overall parking plan should identify the area identified for use as staging for WB -62 vehicles and its impact evaluated in the determination of the overall minimum parking requirement for the VVMC campus. The VVMC additionally has deliveries of oxygen on a less frequent basis for a period of approximately one hour. Oxygen is typically delivered once every 10 to 14 days in the summer and weekly during the winter when usage is increased. It is anticipated the oxygen truck will off load while parking directly to the south of the oxygen tanks occupying a portion of the drive aisle and several parking spaces. The applicant has demonstrated the ability to coordinate this delivery and mange any potential negative impacts during the short duration of time the action is occurring, including coning off the parking spaces so as to not block users in. While this overall development objective will not be address until the East Wing redevelopment sequence is completed, the West Wing redevelopment begins to address those elements which will not be able to be accommodated within the enclosed facility. 3. Ambulance access to and from the site. Goal for West Meadow Drive Traffic —Remove the majority of VVMC- generated traffic from West Meadow Drive. Upon completion of the East Wing sequence of redevelopment ambulance access will occur off of the South Frontage Road at the VVMC's new "front door". In the interim during the redevelopment of the West Wing ambulances will continue to utilize West Meadow Drive for access to the emergency room. 4. Vehicle access that uses South Frontage road for primary access. Goal for West Meadow Drive Traffic —Remove the majority of VVMC- generated traffic from West meadow Drive. Town of Vail Page 6 Upon completion of the East Wing sequence of redevelopment ambulance, employee, visitor, and patient access will occur off of the South Frontage Road at the VVMC's new "front door". The only remaining vehicular traffic on West Meadow Drive generated by the VVMC will be loading and delivery vehicles. In the interim the applicant has proposed to alter the use of the west parking lot and structure parking lot. During the construction of the West Wing the user groups utilizing each parking area will be altered. Employees will utilize the west parking lot and patients and guests will use the structured lot. This proposal accomplishes several objectives. • Patients and guests will not need to drive through the construction zone. hazards. • There will be a significant reduction in the number of daily vehicular trips on West Meadow Drive. Patient and guest parking spaces turn over many more times throughout the day resulting in a significant number of trips. Employees tend to turn over parking spaces only two to three times in a day. This proposal does result in the need to implement the interim South Frontage Road traffic improvement which includes aligning the municipal parking lot access with the VVMC access and the incorporation of medians. Additionally, way -finding signage for the change in user group access to the VVMC will need to occur. A memorandum from Turn Key consultants addressing, Construction Sequence Traffic Impacts & Mitigation (Parkinq Swap) describes this alteration and its impacts (Attachment D) 5. Minimize vehicle trips on West Meadow Drive. Goal for West Meadow Drive Traffic —Remove the majority of VVMC- generated traffic from West Meadow Drive. Upon completion of the East Wing sequence of redevelopment ambulance, employee, visitor, and patient access will occur off of the South Frontage Road at the VVMC's new "front door". The only remaining vehicular traffic on West Meadow Drive generated by the VVMC will be loading and delivery vehicles. This results in a reduction in the number of trips generated by the VVMC on West Meadow Drive from approximately 1,400 to 56 daily peak trips. There will be no net new vehicle trips added to West Meadow Drive as a result of the West Wing expansion. A result of the proposal to alter the location of the employee and guest/patient parking there will be a reduction in the number of typical peak trips from 1325 (total does not include loading and delivery trips) to 275. 7. Middle Creek Riparian corridor. Goal for Middle Creek — To address existing site conditions along VVMC's boundary with Middle Creek in order to minimize potential impacts from surface drainage on the water quality and the adjacent riparian habitat along the creek. Town of Vail Page 7 The VVMC MP identifies several opportunities to improve the health and aesthetics of Middle Creek adjacent to the west parking lot. Those include: • Re -grading the parking lot or installing gutters to prevent drainage from flowing directly into the creek. • Installation of oil/sand separators or bio-swales to clean run-off before it flows from the site. • Installation of riparian vegetation along VVMC lands adjacent to the creek. • Implementation of "creek sensitive" snow removal/storage practices. • Better defined and demarcated parking areas. The applicant has included a design for the west parking lot. This design is interim for the following reasons: • A need to maximum the number of parking spaces on the site during the construction of the West and East Wings in order to continue operating the campus. • The potential land exchange if it occurred would involve the west parking lot and create a need to alter its configuration. • A need to meet the requirements for a minimum of a 10 -foot buffer around the parking lot as required by Section 14-5-2, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code. • A need to meet the minimum snow storage requirement of 30% as required by Section 14-5-2, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code. In order to address the goal of minimizing potential impacts to Middle Creek, prior to establishing and constructing a final parking lot design in conjunction with the East Wing sequence, the applicant is proposing to implement several improvements in the interim. Those improvements include: • The installation of a sand/oil separator to capture and filter the drainage off the parking lot. • The installation of curb and gutter along the perimeter of the parking lot to direct drainage to the sand/oil separator and clearly establish the boundaries of the parking area. • Installation of a low fence along the creek to create a visual and physical barrier to the pushing of snow toward the creek. • Development of a snow management strategy which does not include pushing snow toward the creek, but the utilization of islands and parking spaces when needed. Snow may have to be physically removed from the site when the need arise and parking is negatively impacted. • Development of a plan for cleaning and restoring the riparian areas of Middle Creek. Eagle River Water and Sanitation District has provided preliminary authorization for the hospital to develop this plan and proceed through the process for improvements to its property. Town of Vail Page 8 8. Provide on-site parking in full compliance with parking requirements. Goal for Parking — To increase the supply of on-site parking to an amount that when coupled with managed parking solutions meets the needs of patients, visitors, and employees. The VVMC MP in Chapter 7 speaks to the current deficiency in parking for the VVMC campus and the need to provide adequate parking as an element for the redevelopment. Chapter 7 contains the analysis and discussion that occurred during the VVMC MP adoption process to aid in the determination of the appropriate method for determining required parking for the redevelopment. It was determined that an appropriate method of calculating parking demand was to include: space per patient bed space per exam room space per day shift employee (staffing peak) Based upon this methodology the West Wing sequence generates a need for 41 new parking spaces. Additionally, the west parking lot reconfiguration results in a need for 21 parking spaces which are lost. Overall there is a need to provide 62 parking spaces for the West Wing expansion. 9. Define appropriate location for vehicle access off of South Frontage Road. Goal for South Frontage Road Access — Collaborate with neighboring properties to define and implement improvements to the South Frontage Road that will provide safe and efficient site access to VVMC, the Town Hall site and the Evergreen Lodge. The VVMC MP identifies the final traffic solution to address this goal as a round about located in the approximate location of the existing emergency helipad. Additionally, the plan identifies and interim traffic solution to address access needs as the roundabout is not anticipated to be constructed until after the completion of the East Wing when the emergency helipad operations will be relocated to the VVMC site. No net new vehicle trips will be added to West meadow Drive as a result of the west Wing expansion. 10. Potential use of Lot 10 and/or the Town's municipal center site. Per direction previously received from the Town Council the applicant has proceeded with designing the west parking lot without consideration of the VVMC shared property line with Lot 10. As can be seen in the proposed plans access to parking on Lot 10 will occur via circulation through the hospital parking. The applicant will need to continue work with the Town Council to determine what improvements will ultimately be permitted upon Lot 10. There will be a need for vehicular access easement through the hospital parking lot to Lot 10. Town of Vail Page 9 13. Screeninq of mechanical equipment. The applicants have proposed to screen the roof top mechanical equipment with a metal panel screen wall inset from the perimeter of the hospital fagade to address height concerns expressed by the PEC. The Design review Board will be tasked with reviewing the adequacy of the proposed mechanical screening. Employee Generation Mitigation Goal for Employee Housing — To provide employee housing consistent with the provisions of Chapter 23 of the Vail Town Code. On March 9, 2015, the PEC heard a presentation on the efforts underway to determine the employee mitigation generation rate for the VVMC campus. A report was discussed identifying the applicants request for the PEC to make a finding to allow for the mitigation of the entirety of the employee generation off-site. Staff has identified several elements of the submitted analysis which were in need of additional information to aid in the determination of the employee generation mitigation rate. This analysis is ongoing and has not been completed. Staff and the applicant are recommending the PEC defers the review of the analysis and determination of the appropriate employee mitigation generation rate to the April 13th public hearing. The staff and applicant do believe a review of the request to provide all the employee housing mitigation requirement off-site can occur. Chapter 12-23, Commercial Linkage, Vail Town Code, establishes the methodology for determining the generation of employees and requirements for mitigation for commercial land uses. Section 12-23-6, Methods of Mitigation, Vail Town Code, includes a regulation requiring 50% of the required employee generation mitigation to occur on site. An exception to this requirement can be granted by the PEC if one of four findings can be made. The applicant has included in there written analysis, a response to the findings that must be made to grant an exemption to this requirement. 12-23-6: Methods of Mitigation: A. For all new construction (i.e., development that does not affect any existing buildings or structures) and demo/rebuild projects that result in a mitigation requirement of 1.25 employees or greater, no less than one-half (1/2) the mitigation of employee housing required by this chapter shall be accomplished with on site units. 1. Exceptions. At the sole discretion of the applicable governing body, an exception may be granted from this subsection based upon one of the following findings.- Town indings. Town of Vail Page 10 a. Implementation of the on site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the intent and purpose of the applicable zone district. b. Implementation of the on site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the goals of the applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan and the town's development objectives. c. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions apply to the site that prevents the implementation of the on site unit mitigation method. d. The method of mitigation proposed better achieves the intent and purpose of this chapter and general and specific purposes of this title than the on site mitigation unit method. The VVMC MP speaks to the employee mitigation requirement in Chapter 9, specifically page 32. The VVMC MP addresses the requirement to provide 50% of the required employee housing mitigation on site. It discusses two primary reasons to be considered in making a finding to exempt this redevelopment from this requirement. Incompatibility of residential uses and the institutional healthcare facility. Limited land area resource which should be utilized for current and future healthcare facility needs. The applicant speaks to the provision of employee housing on pages 19-21 of the written narrative. The applicant address several of the findings identified above at the arguments for making a finding to permit 100% of the employee mitigation requirement to occur off-site. Staff believes for two reasons a finding can be made to permit the off- site provision of the required employee mitigation. Those reasons include: • The primary purpose of the General Use District is for the provision public and quasi -public uses which, operate with unique impacts. In this case a healthcare facility which is open 365 days a year, 24 hours a day. • The need to ensure adequate ability to expand the VVMC campus in the future to address health care needs. With the exception of the need to return to the PEC to determine the employee housing generation rate and the need to include a stream back restoration for Middle Creek staff believes the West Wing redevelopment meets this criterion. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. The fact that the building is expanding outward and upward will have impacts upon light and air. However, the applicant has been responding to comment from the PEC to address bulk, mass, setback, and height concerns which should mitigate the negative Town of Vail Page 11 impacts created by the redevelopment. Staff does not believe there will be any impact upon the distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs as a result of this redevelopment. Staff believes that the West Wing redevelopment meets this criterion. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. Staff's response to Criterion 1 addresses the interim and overall impact to traffic trip generation, circulation, and site access during the West Wing sequence of redevelopment and ultimately upon completion of the East Wing. The VVMC campus redevelopment will ultimately resulting a significant decrease in VVMC generated traffic trips on West Meadow Drive. As anticipated the VVMC will have a new "front door" with access directly off of the South Frontage Road for all user groups with the exception of loading and delivery vehicles. Additionally, upon construction of the East Wing pedestrian circulation routes will be established to allow for a north south connection between West Meadow Drive and the South Frontage Road. This connection is identified within the VVMC MP. The interim west parking lot design includes provisions for snow storage and management. As there is a desire to maximize parking space on the west parking lot during the redevelopment of the campus the applicant was only able to achieve 18% snow storage include the temporary use of the north row of parking. For an unheated parking lot 30% of the area needs to be accounted for to accommodate snow storage. The applicant has identified that in the interim a managed solution included the off loading of snow will need to occur to address the need to provide parking for the campus. In the interim staff believes the strategies identified will adequate address the need to provide snow storage and parking. Staff believes that the West Wing redevelopment meets this criterion. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Goal for Building Massing — The massing (and scale) of hospital expansions to be responsive and sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood. Goal for Building Relationship to West Meadow Drive — To establish an appropriate physical and visual relationship between the hospital and the pedestrian corridor along West Meadow Drive by use of effective building design, architecture and landscape improvements. Town of Vail Page 12 Goal for Architecture — To integrate the design of new buildings and expansion areas with existing portions of the hospital so as to create a varied but unified architectural expression. The VVMC MP speaks to each of these goal statements on pages 12 through 17 of Chapter 4. The PEC has held two public hearings at which building massing, relationship to West Meadow Drive, and Architecture have been discussed. The applicant presented response to feedback at the March 9t" hearing where there was general agreement that the changes were appropriate in addressing the goal statements. There was comment regarding the need to carry the changes which were implemented on the south expansion to the west elevation in order to provide greater visual interest. The applicant has made a number of revisions to the west elevation to address the feedback heard on March 9t". Those changes can be found on sheet A201 of Attachment B. Changes include fagade materials, window configuration, articulations, etc. A rendering has been included within Attachment B. Additional renderings will be presented at the hearing to aid in understanding material transitions, shadowing, and articulation. With regard to the south expansion's relationship with West Meadow Drive there was a great deal of discussion about the appropriate setback, landscape buffer, and building articulation. As a result of feedback from the PEC the applicant is proposing a south expansion which includes the basement and first level at a setback of 8 to 12.5 feet over a length of 77 feet and levels two, three, and four at a setback of 3.5 to 6 feet (faces of column elements) for a length of approximately 51feet. This was done to accomplish the following objectives: Creation of an appropriate relationship with the pedestrian on the sidewalk by eliminating a 66.5 foot tall building immediately adjacent to the sidewalk. Allow for the implementation of a landscape plan which will address buffering for pedestrians and neighboring properties. Creation of visual interest in the fagade of the building and relationships to other parts of the building which have upper floor cantilevers. The applicant placed an emphasis on creating a design which through articulation, material application, landscaping, etc. creates an appropriate relationship with adjacent the neighborhood. The result has been a design based performance approach to addressing bulk, mass, height, and setbacks to accomplish relationships with the neighborhood and maintain the character. Staff believes that the West Wing redevelopment meets this criterion. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed use. Town of Vail Page 13 VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission approves, with conditions, an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additional floor plate on the west wing, located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West (Vail Valley Medical Center)/Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, Lot 2E, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D, Vail Village Filing 2, and regard thereto. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria described in Section VI of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approves, with conditions, this request; the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission approves, with conditions, an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additional floor plate on the west wing, located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West (Vail Valley Medical Center)/Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, Lot 2E, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D, Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. " Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approves, with conditions, this request; the Community Development Department recommends the Commission include the following conditions: "The following conditions/expectations will be included within the pre -development agreement between the Vail Valley Medical Center and the Town of Vail. That agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of a building permit for the West Wing. 1. A finding has been made by the PEC to mitigate 100% of the employee generation created by this proposal off-site. The VVMC shall submit a final Employee Housing Report (to determine employee generation rate and required mitigation) for review and approval by the PEC prior to submittal of a building permit application for the West Wing. 2. Due to the uncertainly of the potential Evergreen Lodge land exchange and the future of Lot 10 and how these factors could influence final decisions on the design of the VVMC parking lot, VVMC shall return to the PEC prior to construction of parking lot improvements reflected in this CUP application. The purpose of this review will be to present any changes to parking lot design and/or Town of Vail Page 14 additional information regarding such improvements that may include but not be limited to. - 9 o.• Defining an access easement over VVMC property for access to Town of Vail parking spaces, Evaluation of appropriate setbacks between the VVMC's westerly property line and west edge of parking lot with regard to requirements for screening, stream health, and snow storage, and • Town Council's formal approval of changes to Lot 10. 3. Prior to implementing changes to parking management (shifting patient/guest parking to East Structure and employee parking to West Lot), VVMC shall obtain or provide to town staff. • Access permit approval from CDOT for interim South Frontage Road access improvements to both VVMC and Town Hall site, • Town Council approval of improvements to Town Hall site, • Detailed design of interim access improvements, • Construction schedule demonstrating completion of improvements prior to November 1, 2015, • Plans for manual traffic control measures (if deemed necessary by the Town) until such time interim access improvements are in place, and • Plans for how parking changes will be implemented, to include but not limited to improved wayfinding on Campus and in immediate vicinity (road signs), outreach/education programs, role of valet/concierge, any physical improvements to East Structure. 4. VVMC provides to town staff a lease for a minimum of 15 off-site parking spaces prior to the issuance of a building permit for the West Wing (to compensate for the 15 reduction to existing spaces from the re -design of the parking lot, until such time the East Wing is completed). 5. VVMC provides staff with a lease for a minimum of 41 spaces prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the West Wing, (to compensate for the parking demand of the WW expansion, until such time the East Wing is completed) 6. VVMC provides a construction management plan for review and approval by town staff prior to the issuance of building permit for the West Wing. 7. VVMC provides a comprehensive roof plan as part of a DRB application depicting all rooftop mechanical devices and equipment and design features proposed to screen such devices and features. 8. VVMC address outstanding Public Works comments prior to issuance of building permit.- Demonstrate ermit. Demonstrate valet parking conformance with Town Code and potential conflicts with valet spaces and truck turning movements. Any change to the number of valet parking spaces will directly affect the minimum Town of Vail Page 15 number of required off-site parking spaces to be leased pursuant to Condition 4. • Provide a final drainage study, • Modify drainage plan to route clean groundwater (from de -watering system) separately from storm water. • Work with town staff to define the preferred location for the water quality vault. 9. VVMC shall develop a plan for cleaning and restoring the bank of Middle Creek adjacent to the VVMC site and proceed through the appropriate process for completion by November 1, 2015." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this amendment to the Conditional Use Permit , the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: "Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VI of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated March 23, 2015, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds.- 1. inds.1. The Amendments to the Conditional Use Permit is are in accordance with the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and the General Use District; 2. The Amendments to the Conditional Use Permit and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained are not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and, 3. The proposed Amendments to the Conditional Use Permit comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 12-16, Conditional Use Permit, Vail Town Code. " VIII. ATTACHMENTS A. Applicant's written narrative dated revised March 18, 2015 B. Proposed plans dated March 12, 2015 C. Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan D. Memorandum from TurnKey Consulting dated March 19, 2015 Town of Vail Page 16 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER WEST WING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 50 March 13, 2015, revised March 18, 2015 t VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER WEST WING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 50 March 13, 2015, revised March 18, 2015 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER West Wing Conditional Use Permit Application January 2015, revised 3/13/15, 3/18/15 I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide information on the proposed re -development of the West Wing of the Vail Valley Medical Center. Information provided herein has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the Town of Vail development review process. This application has been submitted on behalf of the Vail Valley Medical Center. The West Wing expansion involves just under 45,000sf of new space, the focal point of which is a new fourth floor on this wing of the medical center. As described in the VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP), the West Wing represents the first sequence of construction in the redevelopment and expansion of the campus. The construction sequence for VVMC's expansion and the importance of the West Wing as the first step in this process are outlined in subsequent sections of this report. Two development applications have been submitted: • Development Plan for the construction of new buildings and site improvements, and • Conditional Use Permit for a "health care facility" in the General Use (GU) zone district. Each of these applications and a summary of the proposed redevelopment plans are described in detail below. Information provided in this report is presented in the following sections: I. Introduction II. Overview of VVMC and Project Background III. Project Site Conditions IV. Description of Project V. Conformance with Applicable CUP Review Criteria VI. Appendix In addition to this report, design plans and other material as required for Development Plan and CUP applications has been submitted under separate cover. A site plan of the proposed West Wing expansion is found on the following page. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 2 Conditional Use Permit Application EVERGREEN LODGE y I 'I d� " ro r - wEsr R�Eaoo-wo-Rrv� -- Illustrative site plan of proposed West Wing Expansion VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 3 Conditional Use Permit Application II. OVERVIEW of VVMC and PROJECT BACKGROUND Since its establishment in 1965, Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) has grown into one of the world's most advanced mountain hospitals, providing Olympic -quality sports medicine, leading evidence -based research, modern cancer care and extensive cardiology capabilities. Today, VVMC is comprised of several healthcare campuses located throughout Eagle County and provides healthcare services to both residents and visitors of the Rocky Mountain region of Colorado. VVMC's Vail campus provides an essential service to the Vail community and the surrounding region. While the medical care and services provided by VVMC are outstanding, the hospital's infrastructure is due for modernization. VVMC is at an age and condition where it must be updated to meet the needs of modern medicine and to ensure the facility provides medical staff with the resources necessary to offer the utmost in quality health care. Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan The Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP) provides general direction and a framework for how VVMC will redevelop in the future. It was prepared with extensive input from physicians and staff, neighbors, the community at large, review boards and Town of Vail staff The VVMC MP addresses a multitude of operational, clinical, and technical requirements specific to the campus and it also addresses important neighborhood and community goals. The VVMC MP established expectations for how VVMC's expansion plans will be implemented and this Plan has provided the basis for this development application. When applicable this report describes below how the VVMC MP addresses topics relevant to this development application. Economic Impact of VVMC VVMC has grown into a major economic driver in Vail and Eagle County, helping to diversify and balance an otherwise highly seasonal economy. With more than 850 employees, VVMC is the second largest employer in Eagle County. This consideration alone has a very significant economic impact throughout the community. As documented by two studies, VVMC and its partners who practice at the Vail Campus have a direct economic impact to Vail. A Vail Valley Medical Center Economic Impact Analysis was completed by BBC Research and Consulting in 2009. The direct annual economic impact of VVMC-related spending in Vail was over $5 million, which included retail and restaurant spending by employees, employee -residents, patients and their families. This report identified other notable benefits of VVMC beyond direct economic stimulation. Foremost among these is that the high-quality healthcare being provided by VVMC gives Vail gives and Eagle County a competitive marketing advantage over other mountain communities (particularly with regard to real estate). VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 4 Conditional Use Permit Application In April of 2010, BBC Research and Consulting completed an Economic Impact of The Steadman Clinic and the Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI) on the Town of Vail. Operations of the Clinic and Institute generate over $25 million annually to businesses in the Town of Vail. VVMC, the Steadman Clinic and Institute have a direct economic impact of more than $30 million annually. This is in addition to the annual on-site economic activity at VVMC. The majority of this economic activity is from the large number of "destination patients" drawn to Vail by the Steadman Clinic. In 2009 the Clinic served 10,500 patients. 4,600 of these patients involved surgeries, of which nearly 3,000 were destination patients. On average these patients made three trips to Vail, brought 2.25 people and stayed 4 days, equating to over 80,000 visitor nights in local lodging properties. Spending on lodging, meals and retail from these visitors represent a significant portion of the Town of Vail economic activity generated by The Steadman Clinic and Institute. Implementation of VVMC's Redevelopment and Expansion Plans A major consideration in the design and planning of VVMC expansion plans is to ensure the on-going operation of the hospital during construction. This is the main reason why VVMC expansion will start with construction of the West Wing. Development of the West Wing will create new space to allow for the consolidation and or relocation of a number of existing uses on the campus. Foremost among these users is The Steadman Clinic and SPRI. These organizations are currently located in five different areas throughout the campus and with construction of the West Wing they will be consolidated on the new fourth floor. This and other consolidations will free up existing space in the Central Wing of the campus that can then accommodate existing uses currently located in the East Wing. This re -location is critical to moving forward with the construction of the East Wing. The diagram on the following page depicts the three wings of the campus and the anticipated construction timeframe for the East and West Wings. f 4 Medical Professional Building yC� r ,• . �; ,•ir f1f Rodr­!.. qp• lor,; ll.i-.i, i FI•in VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 5 Conditional Use Permit Application III. PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS WMC is located on three parcels of land that total 4.57 acres. As depicted on the site context drawing below, the West Wing of the hospital is located at the western end of the campus. The site is bordered on the north by South Frontage Road and on the south by West Meadow Drive. Vehicular access to WMC is provided by South Frontage Road and West Meadow Drive. South Frontage Road provides access to an employee parking structure located at the northeast corner of the campus and to the US Bank building. West Meadow Drive provides access to patient and guest parking at the west end of the campus and to loading/service facilities located at the southeast corner of the campus. 9 , ILi WestExpansio Win VV MC Redevelopment Master Plan VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 6 Conditional Use Permit Application IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Below is a summary of the proposed project and detailed discussion of specific elements of the proposed West Wing. The project's conformance with applicable review criteria is found in Section V. of this report. Summary of Proposed Expansion of West Wing West Wing project involves additions to the existing building, site work to the west parking lot, landscape/streetscape enhancement and interim site improvements necessary to service the hospital. The following is a description of proposed improvements. West Wing Building Improvements Major elements of the West Wing expansion include the following: • A new fourth level that will provide space for The Steadman Clinic and Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI). This space will allow these two organizations to consolidate their operations which are currently dispersed throughout the campus in multiple locations. • Third level expansion will enhance the existing Surgical Suites area of the hospital. The focal point of this expansion is to increase pre-op and recovery areas, to expand staff support space, and to relocate and expand the Sterile Processing Department. • The focal point of the Second Level expansion is to allow for the conversion of a number of double -bed patient rooms to single rooms. • First Level expansion will create expanded lobby and circulation spaces, expand Howard Head Sports Medicine, and provide space for SPRI. In addition to the new square footage outlined above, much of the West Wing will be renovated and re -purposed as a part of this project. Expansion to the West Wing will provided new and renovated space that is critical to providing quality patient care. As mentioned above, another important consideration, or result, of this new West Wing expansion is that it will provide space for the relocation of existing uses in the Central and East Wings (that will then allow for the demolition and reconstruction of the East Wing). West Wing Site Improvements Site improvements associated with the West Wing expansion include the following: • A portion of the existing parking lot is redesigned and re -graded. Re -grading is necessary due to changes to the entry to the West Wing and to conform to ADA standards. • Redesign/re-grading of the entry drive off of West Meadow Drive. • Installation of curb along west side of lot to direct run-off away from Middle Creek and to better demarcate parking areas. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 7 Conditional Use Permit Application • Installation of storm water quality improvements (oil/sand separator, curb) and restoration of the east bank of the Middle Creek corridor adjacent the West Lot. • Relocation of the liquid oxygen storage tank (from West Meadow Drive to the north side of parking lot). • New surface loading area on north side of West Wing (for larger trucks, mobile imaging truck, etc.). • Redesign of the portion of parking lot located on adjoining Lot 10 (owned by Town of Vail). Temporary Generator Location The West Wing will necessitate the re -location of a generator that is currently located in the basement of the West Wing. The generator will temporarily be located immediately north of the West Wing. Upon completion of the East Wing the generator will be moved to its permanent location in the new Central Plant. Parking Lot Improvements While a final parking lot design is provided with this CUP application, a number of factors may necessitate changes to this plan. Foremost among are how the potential land exchange with the Evergreen Lodge and the future status of Lot 10 could affect parking lot design. It is assumed that proposed parking lot improvements will not be constructed until the end of the West Wing expansion, roughly the fall of 2016. If events unfold such that changes to the parking lot design are necessary VVMC will return to the PEC to present amendments to final parking lot improvements. Building_DesignDesign The design of the West Wing has been done in response to the design guidelines and considerations outlined in the VVMC MP. Materials and detailing from the existing Central Wing/Women's Center have influenced materials on the West Wing. Building off -sets, stepbacks and building materials have been used to articulate the building to minimize its mass along West Meadow Drive. Landscape and streetscape treatments have also been used to soften the buildings relationship to West Meadow Drive. Renderings of the West Wing are found on the following page. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 8 Conditional Use Permit Application The use of stone on the West Wing complements the existing Central Wing and serves to unify the project design. Articulation of the south fagade reduces the perceived scale of the building. Landscape Design Landscape and streetscape improvement plans have been submitted. Major elements of these plans include: • Restoration of the ground surface immediately west of the West Lot and east of Middle Creek. • Landscape islands within the redesigned parking lot. • Plant materials along West Meadow Drive to "soften" the visual impact of the building and to add color and interest along the street. • Outdoor dining patio along West Meadow Drive. • Use of a heat -melt system on the walkway/ramp that connects the West Wing entry with the Town's sidewalk along West Meadow Drive. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 9 Conditional Use Permit Application Conceptual plan for streetscape and landscape improvements along West Meadow Drive. The walkway from the Town's sidewalk to the West Wing entry will be heated. More specific information and analysis of improvements proposed to the West Wing is provided below for: Zoning/Development Standards Building Expansion/Re-organization of Uses and Square Footage Parking Traffic Employee Housing Zoning/Development Standards In the GU District the following development standards are to be proposed by the applicant and "prescribed by the PEC" as a part of the review of the CUP. The following summarizes proposed development standards relative to the West Wing. Development standards for site coverage, landscaping and setbacks have been calculated based on the land area of the portion of the VVMC campus zoned General Use. Lot Area and Site Dimensions The VVMC campus is located on four parcels of land that comprise +/-4.57 acres. For the purposes of this CUP application, only the land area of Lots E and F, Vail Village Filing 2 (the main campus that is zoned GU, and exclusive of the US Bank parcel and the small parcel of land recently purchased from the Evergreen Lodge) is included in defining development standards. The land area addressed by this CUP is 3.8 acres, or 166,269sf. A survey of the subject parcel has been provided under separate cover. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 10 Conditional Use Permit Application Setbacks Proposed setbacks for the West Wing are as follows: Front (along West Meadow Drive) Proposed — varies from 3.5' to 33' Side (to the west property line w/Lot 10) — Proposed — varies from 23' to 45' Rear (to the north property line) Proposed —varies from 105' to 121' Building Height The proposed roof of the West Wing is at elevation 8,205'. While the grade along Meadow Drive varies, the average grade along the south elevation is +/-8145, meaning the West Wing is +/-60 in height. Building heights are depicted on elevations and other drawings provided in the design package that has been submitted under separate cover. Density Control N/A Landscape Proposed landscape area is 25,115sf, or 15.1 % of the total site area. Existing landscape area is 22,362sf, or 13.4%. Site Coverage Proposed site coverage is 85,OOOsf, or 51.1% of the total site area. Existing site coverage is 78,539sf, or 47.2%. Parking and Loading Parking demand from the West Wing expansion, how proposed parking is addressing this demand, parking management, truck access and snow storage is address in subsequent sections of this report. Plans and diagrams depicting site coverage, setbacks, and landscape area have been provided under separate cover. Building Expansion/Re-Organization of Uses and Square Footage The West Wing expansion will trigger a significant amount of re -organization and re- location of uses with VVMC. Below is a comparison of existing square footage and uses to proposed square footage and uses. The purpose of this analysis is to provide an VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 11 Conditional Use Permit Application understanding of the net new increase in square footage from the West Wing expansion and specifically how this will affect parking requirements (note that a similar analysis of how expansion will impact new employee generation is provided in the VVMC Employee Housing Plan that is provided under separate cover). Floor plans depicting existing and proposed uses, square footages, and other changes to the West Wing are found at the end of this report. Basement Level Existing uses in the basement level include the hospital cafeteria, back of the house functions (computer room, mechanical spaces, etc.) and a small office used by the Facilities Department. A relatively minor expansion to the basement level is proposed. Net square footage increases from 4,754sf to 7,484sf. Minor changes will be made to the cafeteria and back of house uses. The Facility Department office will be removed and +/-3,230sf of meeting room space will be created. This space will replace +/-1,900 sf of existing meeting room space that is currently located in the East Wing. In summary, changes to the basement level will have no impact on parking or other CUP review process considerations. Level 1 The two major uses currently located on the Level Tare Colorado Mountain Medical (CMM) and Howard Head Sports Medicine (HHSM). Other uses include the retail pharmacy, gift shop, an MRI room and the main lobby. A portion of the West Wing south facade will be expanded and the main entry to the building will be expanded to the west and north. Net square footage on Level 1 increases from 11,171 sf to 17,279sf. The southern expansion will provide additional space for HHSM (but more importantly provide a building footprint for expanded space for the Patient Care area on the second floor and for the Surgical Suites on the third floor). HHSM increases in size by 3,300sf, but this square footage will result in only two additional patient treatment areas and two additional employees. The majority of the new square footage for HHSM will provide for larger patient treatment areas and exercise/performance areas for patients and for expanded staff support space. CMM will be relocated to the US Bank Building and reduced in size from 16 exam rooms to 8 exam rooms. SPRI will be re -located in this space (and space of the new fourth floor) and occupy 5,700sf on Level 1. Minor expansions will be made to the pharmacy and the gift shop. In summary, the expansion to HHSM will result in a modest increase to parking demand as will the SPRI expansion. The re -location of CCM will result in a reduction in West Wing parking demand. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 12 Conditional Use Permit Application Level 2 While Patient Care (hospital beds) and Intensive care will remain the primary uses on the second floor, a new Cardiac Catheterization Lab (Cath Lab) is currently under construction on Level 2. The Cath Lab necessitated the re -location of four ICU beds, which in turn displaced four patient beds. These four beds will not be replaced, resulting in a total reduction of VVMC beds from 58 to 54. Net square footage on Level 2 increases from 16,349sf to 18,836sf. Expanded floor area is primarily a function of the building expansion to the south side of. Expansion in this specific area is necessary due to the existing layout and functions on the patient care unit. West Wing will add a total of 2,487 square feet to Level 2. Of this additional square footage, 1,630 square feet is dedicated to the new Cath Lab. The balance of new square footage will provide space to enhance other aspects of patient care. In summary, the Cath Lab will have a modest increase to parking requirements. This increase, however, this is off -set by the removal of four hospital beds. Level 3 Surgical Suites (including four operating rooms and associated pre-op and post-op areas) and the Steadman Clinic are the two existing uses on Level 3. The Steadman Clinic space will be re -located to the new fourth floor and upon completion of the West Wing the entire third floor will be devoted to the Surgery Suites and the directly related use of Sterile Processing. Square footage devoted to the Surgery Suites nearly doubles in size. Total square footage on Level 3 increases from 16,344sf to 21,780sf, an increase of 5,436sf. While there is no increase in the number of operating rooms, space devoted to pre-op, post-op and support spaces increases significantly. Sterile Processing is currently located in the East Wing. While the new Sterile Processing area will increase in size, there will be no increases in the number of employees. In summary, while there will be an increase is square footage to the Surgical Suites the number of operating rooms is unchanged and no increase in patient capacity will result. As such there is no new parking demand on Level 3. Level 4 Level 4 will provide 24,443sf of new space for the Steadman Clinic and SPRI. SPRI will occupy approximately 7,278sf on Level 4 and when added to their 5,700sf on Level 1 SPRI will have 13,050sf of space in the West Wing. After vacating their existing offices in the Central and East Wings SPRI will have a net gain of 4,222sf. The new Steadman Clinic space totals 17,165sf. After vacating 8,401sf of existing space in the West and Central Wings, the Clinic will have a net gain of 8,764sf. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 13 Conditional Use Permit Application In summary, expansions to SPRI and the Steadman Clinic will both result in increased parking demand generated by increased number of employees and in the case of the Clinic from an increase to patient exam rooms. Parking and Circulation The following section addresses parking requirements from the West Wing expansion, parking lot design, parking solution, changes to how parking will be managed, truck access, and snow storage. Parking Requirements for West Wing Expansion Parking demand for the West Wing was calculated using the "employee based" parking formula outlined in the WMP MP. This formula is: space per patient bed space per exam room space per day shift employee Based on this formula the parking requirement for the West Wing is: Level B — no new parking demand Level 1 — 2 new exam rooms/patient tables at HHSM 2 new employees at HHSM 4 total parking spaces (parking demand from SPRI addressed in Level 4) Level 2 - 2 new exam rooms at Cath Lab 3 new employees at Cath Lab 5 total parking spaces Level 3 - no new parking demand Level 4 - 6 new employees at SPRI 13 new exam rooms at Steadman Clinic 25 new employees at Steadman Clinic 44 total parking spaces The total parking demand from the expansion of the West Wing is 53 spaces. The relocation of CMM to the US Bank Building and their reduction from 16 exam rooms to 8 exam rooms results in a reduction of 8 parking spaces. The removal of four patient beds on Level 2 results in a reduction of 4 parking spaces. The net parking requirement for the West Wing is 41 spaces. Proposed Parking Lot Design The west parking lot has been redesigned due to ADA considerations related to the West Wing expansion. The most significant aspect of this redesign is the re -grading of VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 14 Conditional Use Permit Application portions of the lot and the access drive from West Meadow Drive. Other features of the redesigned lot include: • New access to the Town's 16 parking space on Lot 10 • Increased interior landscaping consistent with the Town's standards (10.9%) • 10 handicapped parking spaces • Provisions for access by large trucks (discussed below) • Water Quality measures to improve the parking lots relationship to Middle Creek (discussed below) The redesign of the lot resulted in a new reduction of parking spaces. The proposed lot provides 84 VVMC spaces. With the valet program to be operated by VVMC an additional 13 spaces will be created, resulting in a total of 97 spaces. Currently 112 spaces are in the West Lot, meaning a net loss of 15 spaces from what currently exists. The Parking Solution The West Wing expansion creates a new demand of 41 parking spaces and the reduction of 15 spaces means total of 56 parking spaces are needed. These spaces will be provided on-site when the East Wing is constructed. Until the time East Wing parking is available VVMC will lease 56 off-site spaces. Leases for the 15 "lost spaces" will be in place prior to issuance of a building permit for the West Wing. Leases for the 41 new spaces for the West Wing expansion will be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the West Wing. Changes to Parking Lot Management Currently 106 of the 112 spaces in the West Lot are used by patients and guests. The East Parking Structure is used exclusively by employees. Changes in parking management will shift patient/guest parking to the East Lot and the 97 spaces in the West Lot will be used by employees. This change will take effect during the early phases of West Wing construction. This parking change will accomplish two things — Patients and guest will be able to access VVMC without having to interface with West Wing Construction, and The changing in parking will dramatically reduce the VVMC-generated traffic on West Meadow Drive. The reduction in daily trips on West Meadow Drive will be from approximately 1,325 trips during peak days to approximately 275 trips. Moving patient/guest parking to the East Structure will require a comprehensive program to inform VVMC patients and guests of this change. This program will involve outreach and education for VVMC patients and guests, on-site greeters/concierge service at the entry to the East Structure and improved way -finding within the Campus and directional signs on surrounding roadways. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 15 Conditional Use Permit Application As described below, improvements to the South Frontage Road will be necessary in order to accommodate increased traffic volume at the entry to the East Structure. Plans for implementing these improvements are discussed below. Truck Access A new, enclosed loading and delivery facility will be constructed as an element of the East Wing. Until that time loading for the West Wing will be handled in the existing loading facility. The loading and delivery plan for VVMC involves accommodating large trucks in the West Lot. The truck/delivery survey done during the summer of 2015 indicates that on average once each day a truck larger than a SU30 services VVMC. These "larger" trucks will be accommodated in the West Lot. WB40 sized trucks can be accommodated in a dedicated truck bay located immediately north of the West Wing. This size truck covers most of the larger truck deliveries. The liquid oxygen tank to the West Lot. The tank has been located to allow turning movements for this WB40 truck to service the tank. The truck will for a brief period of time obstruct a handful of parking spaces. This truck delivers on average once every two weeks, more frequently when surgery caseloads are high. Deliveries can be scheduled and require less than one hour of time. On the rare occasion that a WB62 truck delivers to VVMC it can be accommodated in the West Lot. The truck will obstruct a handful of parking spaces, however given the extremely limited frequency of this sized truck servicing the hospital, this is not considered to be an issue. Truck turning studies demonstrating how WB40 and WB62 trucks can maneuver in the West Lot have been provided under separate cover. Snow Storage Town codes require snow storage areas equal to 30% of the parking lot area. Snow storage is typically provided within interior landscape islands and on the perimeter of parking areas. Usable areas for snow storage at VVMC are very limited. Areas to the west of the parking lot will not be used in order to not plow snow into Middle Creek. While there is land area north of the parking lot, this area is not viable due to a retaining wall that runs the length of the parking lot. Areas to the south of the lot are too close to Meadow Drive and the hospital itself defines the eastern edge of the parking lot. The snow storage plan for VVMC utilizes interior landscape islands and parking spaces along the north side of the lot. These areas represent 18% of the parking lot area. The snow storage plan will entail storing snow along the northern row of parking stalls and throughout the winter when necessary trucking snow from the parking lot. 18 spaces are VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 16 Conditional Use Permit Application labeled "snow storage". However, it is unlikely that all 18 spaces will be used for snow storage except for during extreme snow cycles. Hauling snow as necessary will be done to ensure a minimal number of parking spaces are used for snow storage at any given time. r`a Snow Storage th'P-) i tiflllll' STn I'a:; t' tiU111171�1 [-�' 1'V NK—: 1\ ct4 Wing C L F Parking Lot Zoning r�nall i Snow Storagr Immediate Parking Lot/Water Quality Measures Page 8 of this report describes how parking lot improvements, including steps to improve water quality and the relationship of the parking lot with Middle Creek will not be implemented until the end of West Wing construction (late 2016). Three immediate steps will be taken to address this issue: • Installation of a low-level fence or barrier to define the parking lot and to prevent snow from being deposited into the creek corridor, • Restoration of the ground surface on the east bank of Middle Creek, and • Improved snow management practices. Traffic A traffic report summarizing the traffic impacts of the West Wing has been completed by Turnkey Consulting LLC. A copy of this report is found in the appendix. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 17 Conditional Use Permit Application As described above, VVMC is changing their management of parking by shifting employee parking to the West Lot and patient/guest parking to the East Structure. The focus of the traffic report was to address the traffic implications of this change to how parking is managed. The change in parking management will have a significant impact on West Meadow Drive by dramatically reducing the VVMC-generated traffic. Daily, peak period VVMC- generated traffic on West Meadow Drive is expected to reduce from approximately 1,325 trips per day to approximately 275 trips per day. This is a function of two factors — the re -design of the West Lot has reduced its capacity (from 112 to 97) and more significantly the employees who will park in this lot generate 2 trips per space while existing patient/guest parking generates approximately 12 trips per space 9 (a function of them turning over 6 times per day). The other aspect of this change to parking is how the increased traffic volumes at the existing entry to the East Structure will be accommodated. Two South Frontage Road traffic scenarios were evaluated — Peak winter conditions based on holiday season traffic counts from 2006 (forecasted to 2015) and a summer condition using counts from 2013 (forecasted to 2015). This analysis concludes that in summer conditions the existing access improvements to the East Structure would provide acceptable traffic operations. Further, that during peak winter traffic conditions the interim Frontage Road improvements (described in the VVMC MP) will be necessary in order to provide acceptable traffic operations. A conceptual plan of this improvement is below. + +"' 4 114, � M x j * ✓M d 0 n existing East Entry ]� Shaded area indicates 1 extant of road work Aa� New VVMC _ Entry k �L a Interim South Frontage Road access improvements (from VVMC MP) VVMC West Wing Expansion Conditional Use Permit Application Relocated "FOV Eptry —Right out only from US Bank VVMC Interii-n Access Conce-ptUal Plan Page 18 Based on this traffic analysis, VVMC proposes to implement changes to parking management concurrent with initiating construction of the West Wing. Over the course of the summer VVMC will finalize the design of the interim Frontage Road improvements and obtain necessary permits from CDOT. These interim improvements will be constructed this fall and be in place prior to winter. Employee Housing The West Wing expansion will require employee housing mitigation in accordance with the Town's Commercial Linkage ordinance. As per section 12-23-4, employee housing mitigation requirements for a re -development project are based on new employee generation resulting from the net increase in floor area of the project. Employee generation resulting from increased square footage is based on generation rates prescribed for specific land uses on Table 23-1 of the Code. The table does not, however, include a generation rate for hospitals, clinics or medical facilities. While the ordinance states that an applicant can submit competent evidence that the employee generation rates contained in Table 23-1do not reflect the number of employees generated by the proposed development, the code does not specifically outline procedures for determining employee generation for land uses not listed on Table 23-1. As required by Chapter 23, an Employee Housing Plan for the West Wing expansion has been prepared and has been provided under separate cover. This plan includes an explanation of the methodology used to determine employee generation, employee generation from the West Wing and the mitigation method to be used by VVMC to meet the requirements of Chapter 23. This plan is under review by Town Staff and will be presented to the PEC for their review at a later date. Methodology to Calculate Employee Generation A wide variety of uses are found within a medical center and the intensity or number of employees for each use also varies considerably. For example, on a "per square foot basis" the number of employees needed to support food service, pharmacy, emergency department, imaging, medical clinics, administration and research functions vary significantly. As such it would be impractical to define a single ratio (i.e. X employees per 1,000 square feet), as is done for other land uses in Table 23-1. In lieu of researching square footage and employee data for multiple medical centers in order to determine a standard generation rate, a more site specific approach has been taken to defining employee generation for VVMC. This approach was taken for two reasons — evaluating existing conditions at VVMC will be a more accurate indication of employee conditions (than relying on data from other medical centers) and it is likely that VVMC will remain the only medical center use in Vail and as such establishing employee generation ratios to use for other development projects is not necessary. Basing employee generation on actual conditions at the Vail campus is the most accurate approach to understanding future conditions. The Employee Housing Report includes the following: VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 19 Conditional Use Permit Application • Summary of two underlying factors relative to the expansion of VVMC that will influence employee generation, • Baseline inventory of existing uses, square footage of space employees for all VVMC departments and all other organizations that operate at the campus, • Inventory changes/increases to square footage for each department and organization listed above, • Evaluation of specific expansion (and/or contraction or relocation) plans for each department and organization within the West Wing and how these plans impact employee generation, and • Summary of required employee mitigation and how mitigation will be provided for the West Wing expansion. On-site Housing Requirements The VVMC MP addresses employee housing and while specific numbers on new employees to be generated by the project were not provided, the VVMC MP did conclude that employee requirements are to be mitigated with off-site housing. Off-site housing is to be provided for two reasons. Residential uses were deemed to not be compatible with the institutional use of the medical center and it was determined that given the limited site area of the campus the best utilization of this land is for medical uses (and not residential uses). Section 12-23-6 of Chapter 23 stipulates that in cases where employee generation exceeds 1.25 employees, 50% of required mitigation must be provided on-site, provided however that at the sole discretion of the applicable governing body, "an exception may be granted based upon one of the following findings". Based on the response to findings below, a request for an exception to the on-site requirement is proposed. a. Implementation of the on-site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the intent and purpose of the applicable zone district. Response N/A b. Implementation of the on-site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the goals of the applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan and the town's development objectives. Response A waiver to the on-site requirement is consistent with the VVMC Master Plan. This plan states that 'for two reasons all required employee housing will be provided off-site. " These reasons include: • VVMC is an intensive, institutional land use. Introducing a residential land use on the site would not be compatible with the primary purpose of the site, which is to accommodate a hospital and relate medical uses. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 20 Conditional Use Permit Application VVMC has very limited land area. The primary purpose of this site is to accommodate the medical center's existing needs as well as to retain opportunities for future expansion to the medical center. Introducing residential land use would conflict with the intended use of the site, limit future expansion opportunities and not be consistent with the town's comprehensive plan. c. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions apply to the site that prevents the implementation of the on-site unit mitigation method. Response VVMC is a unique land use and an "extraordinary circumstance ". With VVMC's limited land area, introducing housing to the site would compete with the need to accommodate medical uses (now and in the future) and in doing so conflict with the Town's goal for this site to be used for medical purposes. In essence, any portion of the site that was to be used for housing would result in less site area available for future medical uses. This situation is exacerbated by existing covenant restrictions that limit VVMC's future expansion potential. d. The method of mitigation proposed better achieves the intent and purpose of this chapter and general and specific purposes of this title than the on-site mitigation unit method. Response Addressing employee impacts with off-site mitigation provides a more workable solution for addressing not only the goals of the housing regulations, but also the town's master plan goals for VVMC. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 21 Conditional Use Permit Application V. CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The same review criteria are used to review CUP and Development Plan applications. Below is a summary of how the proposed West Wing expansion conforms to these criteria. A summary of how the West Wing conforms to the VVMC MP follows. (1) Describe the precise nature of the proposed use and measures proposed to make the use compatible with other properties in the vicinity. Response The precise nature of the proposed use is described in Section IV. above. VVMC has been in place for 50 years and over this time compatibility of the hospital use with the surrounding residential and mixed use neighborhood has been established. There are no changes in uses proposed by this CUP that would adversely affect VVMC's compatibility with other properties in the vicinity. The design of the building expansion has been done in response to guidelines and parameters outlined in the Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP)that are intended to ensure building design that is responsive to the surrounding area. The proposal will result in a significant reduction of VVMC-generated traffic from West Meadow Drive, improving VVMC's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. (2) The relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. Response The West Wing expansion proposed by this CUP application represents the initial step in a +$100,000,000 expansion to the medical center. These expansion plans are outlined in the VVMC MP, a master plan that has been determined to be consistent with the Town's development objectives. The proposed use will result in many upgrades to the medical center that will provide a facility to allow for the upmost in quality health care to the Vail community and surrounding area. These improvements will also reinforce VVMC's ability to expand medical services or offer new services in the future and in doing so continue to provide quality health care to the community and to continue to provide significant economic benefits to the Town of Vail. (3) The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facility needs. Response The proposed use will not affect any of the considerations outlined above. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 22 Conditional Use Permit Application (4) The effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking area. Response As outlined above, changes to parking management will result in a dramatic reduction of VVMC-generated traffic on West Meadow Drive. Improvements to the South Frontage Road will be made to ensure appropriate traffic flow at the entry to the East Structure. (5) The effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Response The VVMC MP includes a goal statement specific to the massing of the proposed expansion of the Medical Center. Specifically, a goal of the Master Plan is for "the massing (and scale) of the hospital expansion to be responsive and sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood". The Master Plan, while acknowledging that an additional floor will be added to the West Wing, provides guidelines and parameters for achieving this goal. In response to these guidelines the proposed design utilizes varied wall plans, building stepbacks and articulation, and building materials to minimize the scale and bulk of the building. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 23 Conditional Use Permit Application VL APPENDIX West Wing Floor Plan Comparisons Construction Sequence Traffic Impact & Mitigation (Parking Swap) VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 24 Conditional Use Permit Application 4- w VVMC West Wing Expansion Conditional Use Permit Application Page 25 I -4 4-j Cr W 4 Y - u_. _..... y � _... _. _._... .-. _._..--. ... O .L (J co m a W �w N F � n 4 7o Th —L _ e liiili e _ LI I I,I NN��M a n v 0 .L a W e�'by N F = x 7o Th _ e W K 3 Ilk m i — w 0zm fjOw cars? NN��M a a ' n v 0 .L a W e�'by N F = x 7o a ' v w rs a4A �GG 205 N F VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 26 Conditional Use Permit Application AN'we, ii U LI u F u 0. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 27 Conditional Use Permit Application .� X W .. «, �\j� ,\ 1r \ ) \) ) §E \ . \ ) (!ƒ ! �( «`. «f :»e §/ )= i | \c { \ ) \) ) §E \ 7 ; )3 ) (!ƒ § | \c { \ \) ) §E ± I vNEWest Wing Expansion X728 Conditional Use Permit Application A- VVMC West Wing Expansion Conditional Use Permit Application N n "s 8 z x I tJ CA I u Page 29 F- = o �> �lo �o W - LU W Y > a IL N W (�? w>>N LO O 5� � O a� a m �oo N m ro Oo J N Q A �� U(00 �'(0O �O z N = F N Wc J � y N rn = 0 2 F— O N C 'O � U N W O a E. 0 0 O co O M z 0 wo = o �> �lo �o W - Y > a U O m N > (�? w>>N O 5� ..N� No Qom ro O a� a m �oo N m ro Oo my o �U /100 LL� UAO -O W M> Z Z O, a CD d' I O N A �� U(00 �'(0O �O a NJ �O r U U N M 3 Of 2 = F N Wc J � y N rn = 0 W O r 0 0 - U M (n O M J �N♦� A O G 0, v Oj J (j O N C 'O � U N W O a E. 0 0 O co O M a z w ~w off= s aaaaaa�- - N o99 - g -- z 0 F— L) 'H V/ z 0 0 LL H Z CH G W IL 'W vI J z 0 F- 5 5 z 0 w LU F— z LU U J Q U a W W J J � = o �> �lo �o W - 0- 0. Om , N W r n (�? O 5� N N� Z Wm9o(nN YY pW `O O U zU m UO oO op; d'NO rnNW�O Wan0 (5wC, �wo C ), app O Q°i a z w ~w off= s aaaaaa�- - N o99 - g -- z 0 F— L) 'H V/ z 0 0 LL H Z CH G W IL 'W vI J z 0 F- 5 5 z 0 w LU F— z LU U J Q U a W W J J z C) 0 Ol Ll ui N W < > 0 a of ------------- < < o do < w z o ID Z - °e z o a z� �Z M O� - 7ZF U oa �m 'o3�- W �a. Otwn FOS a x U d o E s e _ U° Q W® i I I , ,I I I I I I � lw z ' Z z < ol 7 w z zo W. 2 o > >LUO ¢¢ o az o� k a ¢c0 LUr 05=LUol 00 fo W U o z ® =m >U F y oF" Q O 3� OI� m a 2 i z � o _ z �a o V QZ F '. ¢O Owm O W O Li J Q Li I � � nH ------------------ ------------------- O O O O O O� / oN � Z O o ,w 0 �^ Lu � a Z$ Q ww JJ Z o Zt k QO> I�l�'� a> N F _. O� Lu LU Z¢J 3 Z. O J Q. z o o � o U w � HEI m U 0 ❑� 0 w d� w Y �+ Z o X ----------------------------------------------------- ----- ------------ ________________ ------ Z J •_ u gotQ Q y i o D D i i i I - i i M ------------------ ----------H--------------------- a I �m w � O w o. N ❑ I `y a � m Z Z W W W JJ z o Gi zC k ® Q¢ • '� :' a2 Mg11 0 LU LU Z LL, O. e 2 >LU I � � z O a ~ O o U I � � o a ❑ ❑ ® I m H El z z ❑ ❑ � ❑ � I o w o o ❑ o uu y� Q 0 - - a � t z El I 0 Q v� is Q L-1 r� I a a � H 0 H ��� ❑ ,i Q" I / v,� / U Q / w y ❑ ❑ a z 8m % / O p.e z !�! }) _ -_ - _/ ( . \ _ k§ 2 « y {\ \\ ( \!` cr -ED LU o¢F a u0 > � 0 o� F a Q Za LO�ii1 .. 1'' e2 0. Q�Q1 m w Ea N �a a = O �9F0 Z Z F a: O Jw o ® I w w a 2 aw o i� Nw Ea U_ z Z O �9F0 Z Z F a: O o-� Na I w w z O l�lL/ .. o ��1E ° �T 1� Ili i/i O o 0 F— inqI�« Uo° O a` z O H ------------- �E _.I�'J�A w o 6t Ell EE U� Uv 0 w_ ]MIPll frl r— M°� 8 H0 N meJ#tfl o o m o �m En 9e ee 8 ❑ ❑ z ao0 0 oa w w z R �� �� N e o o e o o I� Im n H Hw �w �I w'In d -- �Ir1r �I�aIn w w �� si z O Ea m j oo W Uv, a >W p o g� k� U5 Qa o J� va of O ZZo o�< 0<v N o -o o a p o -o a U s a 2 > ° �> ❑ 9 0U o 0 0 O IQ w w o €� z O O U ❑ o 0 0 O ❑ o LL ❑ 8=- O yew o 0 0 � z oo e � w� e e d� ETAg _ o w I e e �o _w e e e o� ❑ v HF e ElElIEEIe r m= o El -,m } e p p. �I I �w a 0 Z O w 2 a 0 N 0 Z e � e wow � wa �o app �m Lu W U o z E N > U F g y p F _ a rc & m Q w O 3 W O //I a J $w v `rw'1 u F ULU r Og co O H -- 21 R: (n � Z o O U w w0 O 7O F� Q C Q h Z 3 D � 0 3 o 3 R I z m z 0 v a a L Ro. LU v Lu - _ yl.: < z a U 0 cn H WOLF I � I r I I J Q s p i a l I yid€ I I E a II I m s a = Nw Ea v I w z b? a L�t5 w a�> rc r r LU r r g m m m A H c ag — 4a �5' Wag Wag r w - - MU�w MO 1 V i LU Qa uj ° �T i U Kim _ J — -- —_-o _ q�'�wc O Z J Q W aE Q �� — —€A m�o w a H m s a I w z b? a w a�> rc r r . r r g m m m A H c ag — 4a �5' Wag Wag W_ HP H MU�w MO 1 H o LU a I 9 z b? a . w /7 I H 1 H o LU uj �T i U � � y� • M, � .Irc 4• MMI mm1r■ l� y� • M, � .Irc 4• C� C) C� U CA rl .r4 4—J CJ] • rl W / {9, i ;Ili CIO 114 u Cf i ;Ili t Iri V f rl , I ,-c ,-c tn NO Ll 9 Cc, CA IN, 9-4 NO rz Ll 9 Cc, CA IN, el I 9-4 NO el I z w W O a w z j M lJ I1 I Ira N M d -t Ln H a � a U) v �� N v ett O W � v � T U x v Hod�Hx � U7 v U 41 j v � uCZ) Q U w u> w41-1 W r ON r- N N ON N N N cn cn j M lJ I1 I Ira N M d -t Ln H r-� Aw a � a � v O v ett O W v T U x v Hod�Hx � r-� Aw r-1 L O > N +, L Q) +, nA V >, Q C6 0 O v L C6 § O VI N v Q Q Q > v co aJ LJ LO +v, > v O Co Q) i n°A U aj C C a �O O � CLOd 0 C � f6 C +�, U v N U � aJ >(U aJ O L E QJ '�, o L } a) of o > O co C6 v G L -0 O >10 + o > 0 3 •� aJ + O a0 o U16 aj`� 3 � o a, v f6 +cn O O QJ J -I- ai .N �, m aj 0 +, 3 ,Q .� N aj aJ .� U _,- L v (6 L aJ ai C co co U 0 Q > +� L L L N 4- co O 4- M� QJ ; Q_ >, N U U L >� cp LO v �Q + c Q O O M +.j 0 N N E w m v m Q> o ro v ,U �^ 3 0� 'Q L O v v a, v — Q- N Co } nvA .v u O E N c v °U O Q n°p } 'N � Q v v aJ L O O E � 2 v� c6 c�/I ai O aJ E •=� O aj U aJ Y + N c0 qA Q V ai o v ^ — O O C6 CL p N aJ L> v O Qv � Q ai v UO_ :.6> v co ( L �O C6 > c C6 aJ +J O 4- W-0 •> O L") v c -N •v � N Q Q +� a co = n3 ai +, +, > a> n Q ocm m° Q Ln v L ° ai v O Q u Q > QJ - ai L °n 0 +1 Lo :2 v X v— L N O � O ai � > c+'n N � bA C6 > X C6 aJ aj 'N L c) aJ C6 C6 `� N U > aJ O E aJ L Q> O v Q Q O U C Q aJ •� Q L -6v a -• O aj H + co X +� aJ cn aC d Q aj -0 bA > U N > N v C> v Q Q E d> L > co V1 ai +J a O � aj 0 C � f6 C +�, U L v U -0 aj aJ a-• C6 N a� E QJ '�, t6 +' o U aj of > > O ai w v G L -0 Caj aJ aJ + O a0 U16 aj`� f6 iJ U C: vaj 'n aj m � �, O aj 0 +, 3 ,Q .� N aj a, 0 .� o aj L L > +J O 4- M� QJ ; U U L >� cp > o o ro Q+ aj q +' v nA m E u v In COL C: v CE c 'N � E > n— U 4- CO 2 v� c6 CO X� a) E aj t6 E V N ^ (6 O l�0 p p N i v N aj N Q v bz v `� Q E 4- 4- W-0 O L") aJ •v � � Q +� a co = n3 ai +, +, > aj Q U Q Ln v L Q aJ ° u E - ai L °n 'r N v v— L — a--� > > __ •U L N Q aj m Q V1 O U `� aJ O U i a -•i aJ Q> O v Q Q U Q O� �+ •� .� NV1 UnA N -0 O, O QC6 aj aJ W N .i vQ N c Q E +, + Q M U O +J 0_70 v > + aj t�A Q v 0 N O ai o Q v v v t6 C6 O aj 0 ai u in � � v v Co E � +O � > �+'- -+'--,v 0 v 0 'a 0 v C Z3 c 0 13 0 v c 0 v P 0 'a FQ r-1 L Q) L N O v v N v Q) O — - EE to v 3 Q E v N v E 3 v a v Oo • N Q > + v > J v o N v 0 v> p Q N O v o L > QL Q) o o- x 4- v O C6 Q E Lr� i Q s= C: > 4- o o cn N v O N N ,° N d 4-> L O QJ c C O QJ Q +- L v `0 v —_ (6 (�6 Q Co •�, § -a � 5 E U .v L x v � Q) cn aJ >j = (6 O N -0 C v v in `� v� N— E '� � `^ N E 0 mv `~ O N ca Q) -0 o� m o L Q� v v 0 c > m zH Q L vO Q' L a (6 LU v o 72 p v Q E > U v Y N vi v O v avc p v v— v =_ a� �.N 3 �Q 0 L O Q) .N CL Q) 4- 0 2 N a Q) 4- O Q) CLO C6 Co U L o 0 CLO0 *.Fl s= Q) v � CL Q) O rl N M w Q) LL c O Q) v Q Q) ul c i2 CL S. - Q) Q) c� G Q) Q) O CLO Q) t6 O Q) ul � 0 -0 O} O L v O QJ o QJ QJ Q (6 M Q Q CL 0 aJ (L6 } Q C aJ (6 QJ N Lo U O 4.1 Q N '� v v aJ N U Q nOA Q N c6 c to s= NO '�> c N V O v aJ aJ > EaJ aJ N L d aJ > aJ Q >� -0O Q cr O N aJ — N> v O N c CL c�i, C,A N OL N O O *' > L O N +� (6 N 'N Q d j +, +�, 00 Q aJ L VI U aJ VI U QJ aJ N Vf N aJ m CLO � a aJ 'L C6 i6 QJ > N N L N c c >, N U Q U L +' C6 L N C6 C6 to aJ .° `-^ O aJ C,A > O C6 L v t= OCLO > L VI LL N to U N > t= aJ +' O E O Q 3Lo ' s= i v O C� c, �Lo � Q Q O Q +- v C= Q v N Q� v — v> E 3 v 4- -0 w > 3 °+ v o� a Q p 4- .- O C: > � v — s= +, a v o a, E � �, — x v x a, v>-0 a) > v N m v a) +, +, u v Q)-0 aj 0 v �, Q .v v O o m.- v Q 'o N o v m o .- `" v m-0 o O CLO m to � O > -0 � > a N aJ L +� Q L t= d t= ?> s= o Q � s= ,n v v aJ aJ QL •N° -0 Q E OQ A O— = N O ° P M m v U C:-0 ra-0 F N v v N v QJ +1 i6 >. a--� L C6 QJ L > cl O N N lu Q- W +� UA N Q p ° +, aJ O aJ VI Q aJ O � a --i N +O O v N Vf L aJ C6 `� Q °-Fl E L C6 i aJ Q> L C,A t= oLo (U U N O w +' C6 aJ L i +- _ +' > N aJ t=Q- 0 N aJ > U m (6 L cn >j t= t= m U-0 +-� (U Q m� t= O +� O C,A H w (6 Q a v Q Q H (6 Ov N w O U O aJ lD v .Q N nA •� aJ to v 06 i OE 4-� aJ O CSA O +' N °-0oo oO° v E v 6 }C + C: 0 v +- c: v �U � 4 X QaJ p n v cVn VI O i O �v v > O Q C6 C6 ~ N C6 aJ + LJ C6 ° E CLO � > i L N LU aJ ca N - > (U caJ CO 4 - CLO Ln U> N c N ._ U p Q U aJ L > c N N O r,4 > O N N cn c�i� d> L N +' — > a--� aJ ?� Q N aJ N •— Ca O aJ c +� LO N N aJ N U C6 + 4- ° aJ Q N O > +� VI aJ > QJ vCLO Q +' +' a i +, O L > U vI v U v N L aJ N O C) -U m CSA ca aJ L N +' Q (6 Q O N N O� O ,� v ai U 'Q E > E dp L O E 0 0 O-F C: V 6Q-0 N ON O fa U Q p O aJ > p� � � aJ p UU iQ VcNnI LJ M Q aJ O O c— Q O `^ _ai +' v Qt6 cn o v v�o> aJ N O = � O O aJ O > Ln C-4 OaJ ai Oai O N ++O C O NaJ U O 'N aJ U a--' 4 L U_ N + aJ .� N w •� _ m +' > +� (a L aJM + N (a (6 0 m > aJ E ?j +' — N (6 N N a-- 4– M 00 O M L Q ° Q aJ M�Q- w L a--' O ff' +' L C6 V1 fa c -I 00 Q m r -i 'N i +�. v Q N CL > � Q Q p LO +� of aJ .� .� +� Q aJ N O � U} 4- O aJt� ca N > Q ra 0 E Q Q H Q � Q U O +� L E N— o `—^ ca a, v 3 3 Q �a aJ v o > o v � v v 4- - > v v +- (n °0 u ° +- oo a° �'m0o ° �- vLo Q U Q O tLD ca C Q Y aJ to �' '-P N O LJ C v to L O Q cn � � (u to > � -0 Ev M >O O to U o0 Q ON a N > � > aU Q p n ONO> Q aJ N O QJ U � aJ > o (a: > Q C > ca w � v +> M N O E +� v cn ca qp �n v > +, +- Q +, � (n >° Q � c v Q ca v Q Q 4- L> M ca O o v° 3 m v v o o E v QL O nA o m � N v_ Q M vi C N w F > U �n Q ca Q+ Q aJ ca v Q Q v Q v aJ E cu oo '� �, �, a, 4- O L M p O mQ E L L QJ Q O Ca Q aJ O E Q LJ •� . v Q v U U H N (6 >j U O° +' Q Q rL6 . L QJ O O U '� Q E O m p +, — Q U U v aJ +� Y qp Q M O U B O QJ +� O C6 p L aJ -0 N w (6 > N� E Q E i (a ° QJ U .— vcL6 L U U QN :L� O a- 1 .- � U aJ p O Q U ai Q- O E� o'CO }pp ' O �> E m o O Co aU-N to > W M Q) 7a -0 E O m v L6 — ca — ul iCva O ca Z � -0 m � Q vi aJ aJ N +1 ?: > N OU N N V Q } OC _O QJ�— aJ Lo ca m— O v E p Q aJ > Q N O O N Q c L Q aJ Q� Q >> O L Q > c aJ C6 CSA Q 0= >> v O w c v v >° v� o m E p c> E v °U aJ M° U� > U cn 4-•i M U Q._ Q U (a 0 v L aJ -I– W E — W 8- �n 0 N m o N N (U Q� L � •-P C N L c QJ V o VI QJ nA trs +- N N— C6 C6 U L +� N .`^ p aJ L p N N p i > c N % QJ QJ v L t= QJ X U W C6 p U U U aJ C6 N QJ N QJ > CSA V L G > C6 QJ E M QJC6 N QJ N 'L _ C6 -1-- > O O O C6 -_ O QJ N C6 0 +v .v C)> N U L 0 +- O cl�+, CSA QJ C6 >-0 L CO > i m QJ W CLOv t= O O CLON N>� ?� N O QL C6 0 CO 4- - CA LL QJ N QL -O �' cN C +v- Q N� a - O ON QO u C6 m N L L QJ Z� LL O� Q i O N O N N m .L Crs�„ ra a i U aj - to CSA +- o N ' L U Z� t= CSA m i > M M y +- QJ U N QJ C= L - O c +� C N +� ra O p to > U •Q U •� C:I% > L tY m QJ QJ N C6 L > > N .2 OL ° ai L OU +QJ � > CC O C6 LO L > L (6 E 4-+.i CLO Q m _I_-ai +� - p i O 'L : t= m O Q a--� = +, CO N - C6 QJ CSA O 'L +� ° '� p c7FW ?� Z Q t= N U N N N '� p U m m N No O ai O U +L' ai Q t= N O O p c N QJ '� Z N +� +' > Q) N O O — OL Q- ON S O 0 LL L QJ E % a--� H a'' c C6 > C L 0 N (6 a--� ai Q Z O v C6 L W N N O O L CL6 Q V = L p a' N T, M H ra O V QJ QJ Q N QJ m m Q O In Q Q % N QJ Crs QJ QJ N N a_., O Uj .t- 4- U Q L L c H U� O ul � U O Q U (6 O QJ CL N c OD N o �, -P � 'N N 3 �� Q� O�� 1-- v N > v O % L W N v a--� i QJ 0 C6 N E L +, -0 -_ N > U c Q Z U +� o o v v v Q} O o > O J U i t= (6 QJ H N N +� U aJ N •> p •> O O O aJ L X > 4- - QJ t= O_I-_ L t= L L U � p > -1- ro 4- 0 -&- +-Q N Q CO CLO+- UL Q) L N QJ QJ i p NE N QJ L CSA O QJ N O C6 -0 m -0 4- � O CLO O '- N ' 1 C6 v O O +� CSA +=3 N +-� N Y i ° N >- UA QJ O 0 � `m t= N v N N p 0 O aJ CO N U — v Q N C� v t= E U U O C6 .L i N N O } O t= m O N N > a--' N a--� � O o '� C� O U N ai QJ QJ ,V N t= ` ai L m Q N U N U N Q N E i ai aJ N� ^ O N L Q Q L +- > m pm N ,}O CB CLO> +Or L O E (U ° 4- QJ E QJQJ d t= J QJ N O C6 CO +-� L .X Q N Q .v Q Q a --i -Q N N a"'i N m — aJ v t= v =3C6 L C ,C t= t= N Q E L WLn +r C6 L N v 0_ C6 L N aJ Q +' LO C U C6 CB ai v Q ~ v v L v 4- C6 O ai N U u a > E L Cy Q L (6 QJ .ai U t6 OL QJ QJ L t6 QJ U QJ O O ai v U .0 (4 aN LL l A C)~ Q v t= +� + O O L Q L — N > CLO C6 C6 i > D > C6 QJ c N N Q) +' +- N N o O QJ -F, U Q) > O --v v a= > v v o o v 3 v n o n v a N° �j — C� L QJ ` QJ >` j —N- > > +� .� Z nA > +� > cvn Q �_ 'L trs +� L trs L N p QJ �, L Q trs QJ > QJ M trs QJ � aJ +-� m E p C_ — t= ._ Ln QJ Ca O >� +-� L U +-j M U +' QJ QJ QJ > QJ +� N N — (6 N Q L N QJ 4- 4- 4- L C:) O > 4- N Q O � tL6 v QJ v U � QJ +' QJ > C QJ +' ai > v nn v i Q v U-- i t= t= m C6 N L v Q v i o O 6 E C>6 i QJ N C6 W N M b0 QJ O C'6 -- N +-- U 4E N= +.i L Z U L C= Q •�, H� v N L aJ c. v �-0W °U > U -0 ro . . . . 0 o � � � m u « \ o \ k E . u $ % a u 2 2 \ \ ?k { a m 2 0 3 ® o u % e ± \ k '� « 2 C)- « .g m q / .g w 2 § k \ \ C E m e m E m 3 CLO -0 .> ) � •k � m � \ - \ 2 U § � � / � / / 0 > > 7 E o m \ ± °'ao-1-- -0 » E 4- Q Q- ® o u > \ m U u ° E \ ® �0 % CLO ?$ 4 k m m U m \ / » » G 2 n / o CI- q E o E o u .� E 2± 0 2 / 2 o- m £ « y - 2 m .Ln A z jj- J'y tot Al�l 'Af LU LL e LL UF 100 A w 4r LL- cn rL '4E LL A Q) L o O �0 v� In Q co v E co bz C C: aj •Q -4- O N ul ul Q) U ulc O u7 CL L z LU n N Q- 0 + N C/7 v E v ro > a v `� L N v - Z, Q vi v M v NQ a� O vi Q L � CY? — a cz � a o L Q- v v CN u� Q O Qo � v c V> cn O v O N + co v v v v— 73 aQonoLZ° C-) ri ry r� .4 gyri Q nA O U uo cn E N r6 Q , 4- ro > L ro x a o E a, L a, — > O v F a v a, v v E Q '� — +� aJ O E t6 Q L E Q w +' N A L +� U U 'Q CoLm Q O L N V N N O N Q L>0 aj O L 4-° C Q a) Q Q O U Q v O v O N Co aJ '^ aJ aJ Co O LLN • a Q ° V ro N > H v r6 E Q- `� UCLO �, v v nn > .0 4, v — _ 4- +� O v L Q Q v coo `^ Q- n > C6 Q Co > ro `� co N > N Q v + �n v v Q 0 +' ° Q r6 OU txo Q o v CLO co a' '� 'v ° 3 • v v co Q— CLO O � `^ v E v v o o° v a� o o �, a, L a, CL N ro > co ai Q O Q C aJ � `� v 4- ((10 C C '� N 4 c +-� L U r6 L W CLO N F o o L aj — +� v o o. g n v +, ai ro Lo '- E E S nA 0, L aj w�� Q N>� L v U� -. U v s= s= v v > +, L x a' m v m L E Q bz O Q- Q O E E N N N Z W Q E L L> L Q C a) Lo E aJ L �O O U M N O +' 4- N O > O aJ v L aJ .0 aJ aJ N ° U NO cNo N Q �' ,o c E c aJ �n 0 N o Q) N N CLON p N UCLO CLO Q O + N U-0 N L L N VI C6 +- bz m U Q '^ N N p L VI 4-v N VI v Q 0 C 4- N N •�, N (4 N > L p L C6 U Q_ v N 4--L NCLO -0 LL C6 U Q N N > _ -0 o m N E L LQ +- m U m o N n W ° ° ° Q QM 4- xo M ° c w oo o v oL Q + O CSA E U N L N a v Q> ' U p U Q C6 0 Q_ Q E 0 Q N N m N +O N L O V Q U C6 Q 0 U > +� - m O M N > p Q Q v N -0 N N NO U In n E +� Q +� N U Q N Q Y > N -0 +' N nA � N N -0 i N U N U L (6 N U > N Q Q N +' Q G I L 0 N i-' U N E Q N Q 'L LC CO UL 76 OL O O QL V1 v Q N wv Q N N a"I p ..pa- C6 > C6 4- bz C Q N N L C6 Q v CLONCO Q Q C6 L vCO UN v v C X Lo v v Z.— U C N U N m .— -Fua--� Cr N N C6 > L v U x U C6 Q_ N QL E qp N E m N U a N (p a)� C N E N 4J E N `� > N N N N U U U C6 p V a L Q 0 L Q N N o N O v v L N U Q- QJ L C U �p 0 >j > 0 v acac�acLnacC)a> m C6OU =Q U E o L + Q O 0 v 0 0 v v Q +N vv _c U O t6 Q N L v o- C6 N ai 0 N N U U C� i > V +-I - N 0 Q O lxA C6 U L Q OCO Q Q O L Q p -0 0 Q N 4- v (6 > L v 0Q o t6 U o N v 0 N vi E ,� v U to O>. L U OCC) + 0 • L v N v O +� N Q nAC N Q '^ Q v Q' -03 -c Q 0 N E U ` VI 0 +' -0 C6 N L +� 0 VI Q c p Q )" O lu w v v N N E M OU N m v N L - ai O N L > C6 L > Q- o N v co: C6 E O N Q +, d- MC6 0 nA N N N Q_ v N-0 -0 N -0 v i — � v N-0-0 Q v Q Q C6 N Q Q p v O N + Q nA v Cw Q L Q C6 Q . C� i > 0 U > 6N c 0O C6 (6 (6 CQSA C_ th +1 pp N N ° +aj Q cn qA d LO Q v N O N N v N c. Q c• - Q N o� Q +� N N Q O cn N Q + 1 N F S V Q V t6 v 0 0 t6 t6 S O v 0 L L ; O p Ln G m 4} _c L.L U �--I G G U W Vi M Lo �--I Lo O 0 - Y > > -0 0 Q , 0 Q 4- N c� G Q) 4- ul Q) N U v 0 N L N Q c O .N Q x Q) Q) ul N Q) Q) O 4- L N L O N ( c Q W +, NO .� v +aJj .O } ++aJ(6 W O O + N O Q QJ +' aJ 2 v Q (6 O E v +� Z M Q '� Q aJ x 0 L v U v o a m E c Q- - v> *' p� X> v a aJ v Co v > Q a O a O L `� O> u (UNJ > C6 L VI O C6 O L N N O c aJ N U v l�A C6 C6 G aJ L + VI Q V aJ VI np Q +� +' N N *' a Z N U O O O N L c6 c m aJ M M N � N N Q Q.c - Qiv + c v p v .� •L > > C6 N L +� aJ O L U v L N v aJ 0 aJ c Q Q Q L Q v aJ Q> N N N N C6 aJ a Q Z ltA ~ U a O O ui Q 0_ a-' m— `� `� W Q +� N L Q i O Q U cn cn M 0 Q- Lo ai ai O— O v aJ �n �n c m Q Q m Q mQJ Lo d U Q>-0> L a +1 c6 v U c ;�v v pv •QN v .v`n > Q o° o 0 n v ° -0 CLO v v v `Ot (U 4- �-0� (LU c6 N nA nAQ Cov W co OQU � > c� W O� aJ L aJ v> v o 0 0 °' O o °J o aJ x m O C6 vI aJ +� aJ aJ U L N m E W Q w m J QJ O V �E U aJ -0> � aJ 'N N aJ Q c aJ O W m O d aJ +' � U L > Ti— +� LJ aJ L +� O O c aJ N aJ J L 0 c Q L aJ c 5 v v c N E= p aJ > p A N O Z O c +� O t6 M y Op v Q L aJ § c = *- v +' m N VI U U L aJ E U cn N (6 E (6 U `~ (6 +� Q aJ QJ (6 O L `� L L aJ L VI aJ d U +� O d N U U U N U.- M O v O c 0 v U c6 c N> i L > Q Q> Q Q O >�> v `^ F 3 +� — ._ +� +' > aJ O +� '� Q m ul '.P m aJ c > w +- Q S. - Q) v 2 U > > Q) 4- c Q) ul ul Q) Q) O 4- v � � aJ N Ln Ln v Q- aJ > O N Co c aJ Q 4- Co x -C a) c +- N U co v :2 N > > f6 v > 0 v c v_ co O - Q c L v L L N co � E c LnM E v 0 N 4 o =" v v +vi �n O v +' O O c �J 0 > a- .4— N N ~ 1 U Q O Q nA v � +J Q Q +J Lo o° v v o o v CLO •� v c v Q- � � •� � + c c v v U L rI N C6 L >j O aJ LS > O Ln •L U LO N N L v p c U C6 O v c6 c6 N C6 -0 O �„ �� 'L c c U '^ O � vi � +� c �C v NC6 N aJ aJ Q Q- QJ *' O E oC a' L m" o v CLO bA N N U Q L .T v Q v> +� v O U aJ VI N Y > aJ L QJ E aJ aJ aJ v> + 0 a n E o v U L + O m (U c U t6 v O U p v 0 4- 4- (1)4-;ncA N 5 Q QL E L L O Q un N S O = O Q> Q z a 0 ao E c6 cn � -I N M Ln -zr-,00 ci -I -I r -I v � � aJ N Ln Ln v Q- aJ > O N Co c aJ Q 4- Co x -C a) c +- N U co v :2 N > > f6 v > 0 v c v_ co O - Q c L v L L N co � E c LnM E v 0 N O O N}O +, o O� vO Q C6 N O0 OU Q - ° C6 C aJ Q) v L v O C Crs v C6 CSA a) + +� v �� U W 3 v L m U cn �O N N L *' N U X �^ E c v O bz N N bz Q C6 Ln v aQ C6 C C6 v •`�' C v L C O O C U ?> Ov Q Q VI U a C C6 U a v O v v O _a L (6 U L N v E +� aJ .N aJ O VI Ln aJ aJ C L O aJ U (10 C C C Q C aJ N aJ v N E Q� +v U c .- aJ E Q Q v LC:I� L `cp C O > C6 o x C6 ai o O C6 O> '.F E m ca � L aj M 0O Q Ln w cNa Q �n v Q OQ 4- > > 4- U L U aJ v L O v m N� 0 y (6 N N aJ i v .N N +' 4- O 'vi Q v t6Lo U c U m E C m o C C mu p O > � +� +' (U ?> -0 n a) — N .- N C CLOt= U x C-0> N aJ O J U C L U C C6 Co Q Q v O a� N 0 M n x aJ C aJ C C)--0 CC6 v m aJ L U Lo v N +, m CSA v v v N N +' �Lo QU LO c m O +' O Q +' E v X '� V C C aJ i O aJ N bA -0 CLO N N aJ aJ C X N U C +' 3: O > > ~ N LU co t= CLO a -0 C -0 4 C O C U� X i v �n .� C A co c O +•i +� co VI •L Co a) > U L O 'n L CSA • C6 VI U C V L O i 0 Q Q N vi CLO C +1 N . U (J Cy X E aJ N U Q) Q) M m E w m Q aJ t= o v � � aJ v m> v U � v +� o� 3 > L>— C�> o> N x O v U O — Q Q Vl ._ — +� � 4- �i 0 m m aJ CO > m H L L N cu O I Q- L C6 V1 v Q O Q a --i i O neo U .� v O v c o v w �n nA �„ C6 m E(u (u (U Q Q �, o- 3 Z� o� '; n• '� 4, v O O� Q� 0 +' v m � c N L Q L v Z Z O O O Q Y m>> N Q- C v N v- v p v Q ,� LJ co CSA Q (6 N N N LU N (U aiO + +, (6 O a C N U Q N E 0 N > qpO (6 = c I IL Q N O N N> U ct[ � C N N-2 W 0 (U' 1=L N N 3 E a � OL + O N— LL 4- O N co N 'X Q Q N(U Q t6 N > — N nA 4 (U O cvi� O (U N vi N O � � N +' (O +1 O(U Q Q C O Q H v Q CO Z O O (O v oN O °J v o Li o O a; v L Z O -0 M° v v o �_ cn Q N L O +1 m 0 nA v (U ('o }; � Q u u> (U = a v Q ° o° °o o Q N (6 N +-' cn O L N i W c E (6 N Q- CU 0N— 0 V N U Q— C > CLO w (6 X X N U N np vi Ti -0� w (6 +� N c L N W N (u N O Q v Q Q v m O C Q Q nA O N Z Q v -0 +, 0 Q `-^ N >j Ti N c n�>+,� Q 'V L o v W_ O X N� N c N N CU v txo p v °' v vnn (u o 00 mo ° o S-� ° Q > v o v o M w o v v v �' a Q-0 Z(u o v (mo (u �; n v Ti Q U M E } v, v v rn c6 v . v +' ''' CLO w O o n v v nn z E v v +' O •- o v Q N L L L O O Q N + E O +� cn N (6 N i' N Q (6 Q O O L CSA L Q Q L (6 N m � Ti O U Q N Q � N— a 0 v U� (L6 X N (U N V +� +� nA N -0 +-� C6 +' v N (6 vI O (0 L N (u (U Q v a p O Q H v Q_ �j 0- U O v N O o `^ v � 0� t6 oC M E L _ L X N Q -o u Ln v Q Q VIO C6 +' U U N m O O N> m-0 CSA (U (6 cn v 4-O O .Q N(U N Q O N > L cn N = N ?j O - U U _ 0 CLO Q Q � __ (6 o Q O O Q C v O •Q L (6 > -0 (U 75 Q Z� ?� a c (6 a (U E N i W .4- 0 --� C6 C6 O (U � W O cn cn Q bz 4- = � ?> (6 L N O > ' V (U (6 � Q i Q \ O Q a (6 O N — 'N O N N N E N.9 L O Q cn + OC Q Q N W � ' > Nm > ui > Q O NOQO Q Q Q :2Q } 4.1 N C: 0 n X v w Lri O n N v ++' 'U �4.1 Q_ m> Q w p0 O U M O� O U 4- `� M N +� N Q �n o cin U `- N O v L N(u > v°j 4- � (6 + (U (U +, N O f n O nA � Cl — Q N v- L} M m >j E o E v +, > a� nA "\ .� C 4- w �, cn cn M v Q S w nA o V m Q Q i U M bA N (6 > N-0�• =� P ((4 N :Ev 3 X> C6 >v l"UN O Q O C (6 v� N v • • • W > Q -0 nA (6 c c (6 Q .F,� vI J i Z v C (6 N + + N C V, > ?:j -6 to QJ QJ — N O O Z +' c6 +' N ° N O ° C ro chi, � O v O U v x Q v— C Q� ai 4—> W +�aiCL Qj -0 i tLo C c) Q U,A H C N •x ul Q c: N v W> O Q Q v, Q O 'u, x aJ v z nA C +, o C c6 Q- v + QJ Q C9 C t�NtA, U U> QvI •QQ O pc -6 `QvJ 4+-Z O E U Q> U O +_ NUc)-7jO O> > tLo � cc(> ul (10 00 C +-— Q- 666 to N N Lo 1 x O v N + Nv� )O> ° C) OQJ0 N Q O Q N N i ° 6 QJ } -0 ac o n -1 4.0 :3 O C� 0 E -a N H C QJ> NJ C N U cn O{+ a',� L U > QJ v, QJ Nm MMQ O +' vi vi c6 QJ LJ L QJ cUi, Q N QJ c6 U N >j N O OC N O > ° � 00 QJ .G v O O Q M Q QJ O Y H •� �n L •0 co O Ol M L > J L +� QJ U U u 4 +� "� Q +� O c -I N L v C M H N v m O E -a N U Q '�, c6 E- ° 3 v v N CCC .Q v v cccs O- v Q QJ L L Q U N G to U v> N v N QJ u LUQ O O O > V O QJ U ° Q + VI cn N v O r' a � — -0 +' � -0 tLo � N o CO 4 v = v C O> O w CLO N CLO L �_ N N L a +1 E E cr N m LU O L E O N QJ w N ,b?:N C +' +� L U N ttA C O Q v +� 0 c6 C O QJ aj Q 4 O Q N> O O O N O '� p E N N N c6 > vi v c6 N +� v N v O ° N +' W O QJ v N M L t v N N N +' nA N QJ In N •.p > Q •O CQ L >— > N + w N a"•� N +.i U ° N E N v Q m N V N QJ VI C6 C6 +� QJ QJ QJ m U Q c6 EN ,n U C N C • L QJ VI U QJ L U +- 3 v ° o > o C C v v O �� °' o C �-C+, O QJ Mew o > v M O u E O Q Q v L O v C ttA v L •�' VI � +' U +, O N > N t § U QJ VI E C6 v C6 > to v L N �-� O v N _C ~ L U x QJ .� v aj >. L N U Q N U ,n O N _ U ° � L c6 am° E C p� w O N C O O�°_C 4- O E Q +' N N Q O QJ w v O (6 — U +' N QJ +- O U L t 4- M O E U O Q- UA C U C Q° N QJ +� v N L N C .`^ v +� -0 0 °> i C C v N O C6 C M C O >� N j > N N QJ M O +' +� C cn M N VI C QJ C LO +� � i Q C Q C i C Q N B Q N C 6 v L H E w m a"� N U O 'N QJ QJ QJ Q •N `n Q M M C L E QJ -M C6 L E (QE 4- U In (U C C U L N N Lo M -Fa> -C '� Lo N aC -C CO O° O O N C N U O QJ Q Q Q C . X U +' oC t o 0 0 Q C ('� O N L N O QJ v L O N C Q U > VI N v 0 N '� v Q QJ o M c6tLo N> v 0 •� CO E Q Q C N N Q C > QJ O E O OU N- m m • • • U Q N 0 Ul .� b w O C A I On O v N v + Ln o v Co N > = o r6 v E o Q v ° "' nn o a .o o�° ° a, o� Q- _ o X Lo ra ' QJ o Q ° 00 • > n °o v+ o v v -0 CO Q QJ > ° '� a, o o QJ O L O N O t6 LU O aj r6 N N Q wN r6 rv6 1 L N N r6 N— N + Q v Q '�n OZaj 0 OL vi nA'� av w .Q v v v m y tlOnA v Q Q m Q > N r6 > + Q +Q �� a, o� o��.N N Q v _Lo v 4— O j v o o> o O Q — � N N +J ai NL$ E_ Q v Q vv v v O° 'Q4) v N O o > 3 Q ° v°�' O o L o_ac�� u�=� o'_ ra o v v N v �^ ra � + Q v E> -0 v Lo� ra to oL v� X v a v> nA Q v v-0 Q +� v v v v 4- N `� O L v VI O ra v v O C N O > ov ° O c+'n N Q Z Q° L N~ L Q r6 X C6 O O L N O O nA N O v v v O O wO j > E� O} i v a Q c N C6 C6 v *' Q = m ° O CL O O o v ra Q v-0 to Q� Q Q O Q 4- O O v� Q N r6 Q v ("6 'L O ra N+ N L Q QJ Q Q Q} N Oul — r) N > O 7 L Q O O O v O Q N Q O v ,v v L M O (Q6 +-j O c N r6 X N Q- ,0 N Il d •N Q Q N N U +� N N of > O r6 O N >, c i a � U v � OJA . f :J � din ra xY u i t m O N { 4 Ap Fl_ �n 0 N 4- Q) co L i Q) v 4- — LO +- C Lo O Q v O a oca •L jrr —_ O v 0 CU o n o 0 O a, Ln CLO o v 71 � un v0" L E o c Q_ N N ?� r" -0 Q_ v — o i as o O cuto 3 O v N w v v> -0 `� v `� N v v o = �_ v L v v M � w (u •> +- > -0 � c' v i n L aJ aJ ' Co 4- O •L >-0 .E vo Q o E n. v E L E L Q N- O vO O Q O U c0 O •> 1 nA + L v 0 v Q- Q N N vVi Q co -0 O O QQ- (10 4- `° N c co 2> v Z� °J N v O v v Co v _0 > 0 ac Q_ L v . o•v Q- O CLO U 'v CSA Q CSA L CLO (U +' aJ v v s= O N v +� Ln CLO O CLO Q (6 L O (o N= X L Q +� v > } .c (� O Q -0 L v O '-Fl v Q C O • v - v v • • � � CLO _a Sv - G p (u N LE v O � 4_ 4-> cn �� W aJ �� Q > CLA CLA +J v v 4, O > O Co > Lo L L a- U • �_ �_ L v N '� L a- (o U Cr O a N VI Co w (o aJ Q Q_ O v a-- Q i U co aJ O C v • L 4-O L U a--� Co O `� > Q v a a C 4 v a, a- vCLO N _� o 0 v �n 0 N 4- Q) co i 3 v 4- — LO +- C Lo O Q v O a oca •L jrr s= v 0 CU o n o 0 O Ln > v 71 � un L v 'U c aj o v N 3 r" v — o i as o O cuto O aJ +, w u E v N -0 N o + -0 o = v v co v v '.F, CL� v v -C +- > -0 � a � c v i > L aJ aJ ' Co 4- O •L >-0 Q o E n. v E E E L ro vO j ca O •> 1 > + CU Ln �' o N v -0 v v Q- c O ~ Ln N 2> -0 (U °J > 'L O v v Co -_ u > 0 ac Q_ L v . �n 0 N i -7— --jr jrr 71 G r" u V] +J i as cn IF F r3 7,f �n 0 N i L� ' I Oa' z > vo o cv OE Lo M v O ma} v s 4- N c QJ v-0 N -I- U U > m 4- +� Q) �_ Lo O nA N N Q- -I- L VI vi QJ v >` QJ p QJ L J L Lo L Q) >, 0 N O N _I_- -� � VI QJ QJ cd •> QJ QJ O O N L C6 wO L U v 0 cc cd co L Co U QJ (6 O cn Q QJ C: — CLO O OJ O M N O u QJ +, > —� w QJ O co c O 4- qp N +- O z s N= O QJ ?> > L _ _ QJ +� N O i N •N q-- -I-- QJ > U N� L QJ N M co N v 0 Q v 4- J vI QJ u Q N c O +_� Lo QJ QJ \ MQJ 0 N Q- N L Q N I QJ nA co Lo U v N DEE MMU v C7 ,, a s N QJ E U > CSA U 4' +� co s cNi� N = N EU C: +� N co M N +� O > X qp X ,} bA O QJ +� � +� QJ QJ — �„ '^ U QJ co QJ c L QJ O •� a--� E L > QJ > v v L -0 aJ v vi OU -a a Y v i6 �° O = 0 O a N v Co Q ai �' a- O L io vI vnnI > QJ QJ C6 NC Q ° -Qv QCLO (U NE N ••ov 2fO N NOEO Q vJ N ° 0lai Q- -0 > X O Q v O v Lo > i Lo •�j ° L N L •L C6 C6 L M C)Co V QJ QJ E L v �' 3 v o a v v I° ° v� v°� u c v � �_ v O +, QJ N U -0 � QJ s �n QJ QJ �n v -0 0 1- U ?i O m 0 -NN ' v N L Co Q- Q O O vG nn > v v O +' o Q o v N�� o Q� �� m o v � '� � nA ° v N a p o nA cid '�n +� +� +� >O '� c U O E c Ti X ltA U-0 QJ L Co O cd U to L C6 O VI O QJ QJ aJ L L vi to O QyJ Q, N U QJ U ttA L �' QJ L cn U N QJ v k Q H S Q O m v O� v C° m-0 Q Q O _LU +Ow o N d O CA QJ Q v � v o � (Da o — > v > N 3 Q O N O +' U co _ 3 c U QJ O aj aJ N +5. S O v > > N Q N LO NO , U O O> Q N v N N 0 LO N"(U x W N N N QJ u 0 O aj p U aj Q aJ � QJ to +� U N L Q aJ QJ ' N E Co }.� QJ N Co In U E 12- CL C:aj a QJ° O QJ QJ Q+ N N v• bA H t1A O U N +� N N v L Q v +' E• N O cd np np C QJ •.G E Q .c O C A 7a E L+' U QJ N aJ — cin (N6 aJ QJ E QJ L p QJ O L VI aJ ai L l�A 0 > L Q H Q 0-0 N co co -0N Q-0 U- O O co O� v 0 O N •NCLO Q v O ; CLO v N^ v v L Q Q Q W O U Q v v L U v �° ° v Y > w p v '� QJ > QJ �-� N QJ Q) p L QJ M �-VI QJ N a"' •�-i L O L aJ > CSA . O +� O Q L L Q U Q a) -0 L U J O m CLO aJ N N aJ aJ N L —a -Lo VI — �'' E Q V L ° Y a"� L iw N cQ iJ U Q ai — aJ O a--� M N Q- .L Q-0+,4- E C6 Q Q v Q Q L N > Q QJ a--� Q ° L > QJ N nA ` O nA OL N o- 0 +� +� > Y Lo N qim L Q } N E O� c6 Q LO U Q m ai `� I OL aJ O t6 Q Q O cn aJ ai v O Q ai -0 v +' -0 aiQ ai N O L E L }.i O ° QJ O QJ QJ c6 C6 `1 U L L a -- y"' U L QJ N QJ C6 N Qtxo E-0 +' � Y v aJ v v v> M U L v> +1 aj QJ QJ \ O Q U ° N L N v ai L N c6 U a Q- E o v v L7 v N v' 3 v x o +- +, O O +� U aJ aJ > N QJ v 3> v O Q c o o v '� v •� a}J Q o x v v o o >° v o o a°Jc > N L (6 W Q c6 L c6 N L Q nA +� +' O N 3 — E Y .— +� L N U 4J aJ aJ N O N L M >�o O ° Ov ° t6 v otQtA U — 6 � N m +, +' w N >Q O J v v v U L OO Q O aJ Q QQ°Q aJ v-0 p O > aaJJ O 4 L C6 L O i N = 3 Q v +' v > Q Q QJ4- 4- i s v nA Y Q v° Q> O o aJ > Q- W L.LN CSA � L '� � � L � � cl-L a -- L C) aj > Q - O cl� O p 3 Q L O O� x aj O a(6JNXvQc QN Lf6 ai ° W O iy+ N N L U ) N 4J ° `^ o f a o 3 v o N a v Q-0 � o 3 3 > Y L 3 v o -Fo�� v v o a °'s oU o �" QJ -- +, z v p v E o c�i� c6 L .c6 N +' _ CL Q aJ Q -0c6 > N � o O 0 o nA 3 o of /On o. N a S v `^ + v° v v L > O C6 ;n L Q •N c6 C6 c6 N n o� n•v ° a o v L v v 'nn n Q- 0 o CLO or X ^ v x> U a +, Q v o Q o v Q v v v N N N W (6 N X •� +'�+ 'x N N N aJ + O o= �° v U - ° �, L v o + Y N� c6 +� L oC Q- ai LL:I� O� 'a > Q L O +� Q aj O Q L c+i� cn ° N ° N N -0 U aJ O aJ i QJ m O w � Q .L > I- m .Q O Q co v O 3 Q v c6 m E C) m J v W U U Ln �' P + Ln 0 N CD N Q N v v v `^ Q J j •� O v _I_- O -6N � p v .v CSA ro O U aJ Q p v r- LU U O > Q.U N > 0E CA -0 L Nm -I CA ( -0 v O +- O ai Q- •L U N (6c U C6 O6m aj O +r Q O +- n aJ O O N aJ aJ C L6 L Ci lD > U >j C6 L O N O O C= X aJ C6 aJ > 'L O +-1 U aJ +' = 0 0 L n — aJ Q_ p + U Q aJ t= t= E O E v •V U v cUc G v C6 0 L + ai p ai L ai 0 U OO +, aJ N 'i O aJ L N aJ C6 C6 L N p O > O L N N c p Co v N o CSA a�-1 Q_ + VI CSA H o U •> L N I Lo + C6 Q OU Q (6 L v N L v v Z U > t=U E O M (6 a--1 N H (6 U +' ai p N L O X v `� aJ O O t6 v v C a N ai > v t= v Z *' =3a--1 Ca N O .� +r CSA + O aJ +' O > +' > t6 ,} LL O aJ N N -0 c RC1 Lu + v N v ooc L°o v v o o o o v E n g > v o o t= 00 O1 W `� Q °; t= +, +, a, m L +, v > >� C6 Q; O Q_ Q_ v O v + ,� (A > ca o E v 42 +' t= Q O Q O o v v N o v +' O Q N o v cn cn +r O L L.LO a c Ca '> (u U E 0p .N Ca L Q) 0 : N (") � > co `^ Z Q > t= aJ U c6 U N t= L v N C6 C np — N CU6 VI a"1 Q QJ Q O v o v 00 •Ca _ +r \ > L Q v N 0 C6 p N tL O v CA >c � ON NO >> ai _I-_I_-QN•N O +' 4- O ( D 4- Q co O +, oC X N Q_ p W +1 O C +' �+- L(10 � -0 v oO ai O O.aJ Lo N :2 > 2 Qj V> c Q >Q Ca Q N nA aJ t= > C6 C6 C6 aJ > �^ C6 O ?� Q H C6 U N aJ � L t= aJ c aJ aJ _ (u a) �( > N cn V N +-1 O CSA O + — O (U H O -0 Ca cn or_ c -I C= LL W > Ca 2 +' Ca ?� N +v-1 N O C� L v i N U• N 4 N N aJ L vI (6 v ' w cvi� >j CQj W av y aj N -I-N U aJ Ca M ai 4- ai O > 3 WQ, +, +' v N v a, O aC > >, o a to O aJ >MC Q_ t= t= W v '� a O v Q oo� a,Evv. - >��QJ oc Q> vU ° a `^ CLO o o � o v Q Q o ul c -0 a a a o �Q, c m=L n N° 0 U v v v Lo3 Qj v'1 Lo •_ _ o D ca 0 CL t= v aQj > av-1 VI L o L Q_ (u W O o N °' ,� 'v E v Q U Uc v ,> ai txo ai O OI S ° v V) G L L N L a"'1 L N v �` CS > 4---1 N W N �O U a�--1 U U U a >, C6 O aL-1 � U VI VI C6 L O j O LO N L O G m O > v aJ M O O 4--1 cn v Q N Q .� +� to > aJ QJ a a, o s s= v v v v v QO � v> v Q c v > U v� .? O ca O a ai Q1 a N v, LL O Q- >' t= � O D U v > — v >j Ln aJ v> v t= a Z QJ ai v� (6 N C aQ •— Co �> L a--1 +-1 U v C Z> pL O i � v L aj N v by N U Qj S O O j U 0> Q- U O VI L C { a C) O or- t= t= t= N Ca-� U p N> LL wE v t= t=om U Qj = i�'G C Qj � aj > C6 > Ca � � >,a>> O +_, L L -0 -0 m 3 Q � C6 C6 M = u O Q Q� •a.+ ° '- p CSA cn CLO (n 'v 'v N Ca N Z m U v a--1 U+ (6 +Nai -1 t= aJ U O Q1 ° +Co t= w � N N t= -1 Q- � Q OL N O co Co L i L LU S aJ Co > (U Ca E aJ > '� cLt is E�� iaac HaC E> is aQ0> 0 CD N .Q- O V~ N + N v > N CSA C>6 4- L > > vI V O U N (6 L N .v V L a N- -0 Ca N t= (�6 Q C6 N> N � L N U v CO (U } E m a(U n >o > +' c p O (U•� N N v L N N N Q N Co C C6 o L L N U N CSA v O � > LJ O-0 N U~ L N H N Q -0 > V L } Q N v _ _ V o L to Q to U (6 L ° v C v > U Q U -0 > ra v c(6V •OL •v U L t= > L O I vwwwvvV L>U (V C(V(V (Q) U > v> O -0 >Ov > N o O (V Ca cn C +, (u -0 CLo N > N U O N> V >� V O i L L .v >� LA O N (a N L N (6 N Q> >j N O O (u t= N C L Y CSA O p Co v >� _ > > N Q }, C6 C6 VI C6 'L .> O N +� to N Y N tL �n �, N O m Q �^ t= v > � +� O .v L v cn 'cn CL6 C6 N +� U >� N C6 O N UU 1 O QJ (V ti o > � `~ •v Ca C6 •UA L Q O L 4- > (V C v -0 >` U L Q- 5 o vQL > c Q t= - L O �_ O +-� i .- LJ of N = t= > � 00 > i L N cn Ca dJ N +J U > } O N t6 C6 cn E O i O vi E N 4- N N (u CLO(u _ O '> p v> cQa N Y N Q O LCo � C6 _ .� U >, ca t= O ~ U (V > Q v L vi M +- is � Q i +� Q 1 N O O O o v cn Ca dJ o Ca > V O A= N +� Q— O O> O L N N-0 N N N U- Q a' — N — >—> O Q) N N v o E 3 E (u.� � v o v t= E o s Q c CSA CB °(U V1 v v LZ (6 L U> 00 s= 0 M L o U v c v o L 0 ra ra (a Q (6 N 0 ,N U O N C v C= > u >, H p N L w 0 t= N •� w +� to >, > L L v O '� N aj M tL v 'L Q) O O O N > VI O W N C6 CSA Q ,v > L N L> C6 +' t6 '� v N v > N ZS +, -0 N O H cn Ca cn .- > +� O > E +- Q �n O N > > v °' N 4- O O L C6 O Ca VI cr N -0 c +1 C6 � ° > ° 0 Q 0 N > O O Q NN Q> ,� v U Y v U O>N LL +- O O 6 Q- C U O vI O O N V O O c Y ° O— U O �_ O N O L N N+ N O N } (6 *' 4 m N �> v N UN> V N t6 ui vO v OV LL 0 N v v O> �LY _ +, >v Ltv= > M a 4> E U O O _ U ai O v >UcGpL3 o LU a +, O mai t� p + ' LL- O > c > m- Up v> E ww L °N N O OZ Q LU 0 QJ — O>- Ci +. -&-- v a OC 4-— O a o� N a LN O (S N E a O 'o N U _ a o vo"E a' v Lo nQ > •_^o M W a - °o o O > (6 O v C�° — (a N>u CA 0 c Q 0 s= 0 (6 N .L N > > VI N N L �' t= N co N Ca Q v L- cn CLO CLO N - U O> C6 C6 U v U v --a° o> > •O N Q C6 ;A W C p a--� > v_ .> t= -0 ' t= v L.L •L N v v +•i � C6 •� •� N U N � Ca t= o N v U G > v o" C6 C6 L N N Ln Q U zs ?> p -0 O v-0 Q L -0 CL O+ t6 > Q L N N N N N U ra N >j CLO Q- J i m to 4-(D N U Ca v a--� N > Z � U N Q O> N N° •N N CC O UJ H v v E v Q U N Q v N> VI + N >O C6 L [y N Q Q O Q m Lov m nn L +� c N m -0 Q N m> -0L O +, L a O tY . . . . ° v .Q- O V~ N + N v > N CSA C>6 4- L > > vI V O U N (6 L N .v V L a N- -0 Ca N t= (�6 Q C6 N> N � L N U v CO (U } E m a(U n >o > +' c p O (U•� N N v L N N N Q N Co C C6 o L L N U N CSA v O � > LJ O-0 N U~ L N H N Q -0 > V L } Q N v _ _ V o L to Q to U (6 L ° v C v > U Q U -0 > ra v c(6V •OL •v U L t= > L O I vwwwvvV L>U (V C(V(V (Q) U > v> O -0 >Ov > N o O (V Ca cn C +, (u -0 CLo N > N U O N> V >� V O i L L .v >� LA O N (a N L N (6 N Q> >j N O O (u t= N C L Y CSA O p Co v >� _ > > N Q }, C6 C6 VI C6 'L .> O N +� to N Y N tL �n �, N O m Q �^ t= v > � +� O .v L v cn 'cn CL6 C6 N +� U >� N C6 O N UU 1 O QJ (V ti o > � `~ •v Ca C6 •UA L Q O L 4- > (V C v -0 >` U L Q- 5 o vQL > c Q t= - L O �_ O +-� i .- LJ of N = t= > � 00 > i L N cn Ca dJ N +J U > } O N t6 C6 cn E O i O vi E N 4- N N (u CLO(u _ O '> p v> cQa N Y N Q O LCo � C6 _ .� U >, ca t= O ~ U (V > Q v L vi M +- is � Q i +� Q 1 N O O O o v cn Ca dJ o Ca > V O A= N +� Q— O O> O L N N-0 N N N U- Q a' — N — >—> O Q) N N v o E 3 E (u.� � v o v t= E o s Q c CSA CB °(U V1 v v LZ (6 L U> 00 s= 0 M L o U v c v o L 0 ra ra (a Q (6 N 0 ,N U O N C v C= > u >, H p N L w 0 t= N •� w +� to >, > L L v O '� N aj M tL v 'L Q) O O O N > VI O W N C6 CSA Q ,v > L N L> C6 +' t6 '� v N v > N ZS +, -0 N O H cn Ca cn .- > +� O > E +- Q �n O N _ L v p � � •U U aJ aJ L +' � L U U L C6 Q M .L W > L 0 N O Q -0 w VI O L > L Co > +' L CLO C6 VI O (o o O U N_0 N aJ > �— p L — o +, cn w 0 N N v C > �O 4- iA V 4— > N U C a--� N - V aJ N — N L v co co co v bA 0 (6 v 0 _ v �_ L N N> +' 0 Y N > N CLOto v c�i� V aJ VI � p U C v .- Q) VI v L 0 U > nA aJ > > -P � > n0: (p L CL i C N a' VI p •L +� aJ Co +� >� 0 aJ N 0 0 +� aJ N aJ v N CL -0 p — CLO cn Ov aJ LA cn O Q) Q aJ Y co '^ i '_' U aJ 0 Co aJ C QL v O N CL CO 0 C6 `� C6 O-0 m Q 0 � G m Q) bi \ N '�, . N Ul 0 a--� L U aJ W C6 U Q) > C6 aJ c �' aJ aJ >_ p CL Co C6 V � U > N aJ 'L bA (o Q) O Q +-� Co N L L L N O 0 a--� a Y L C Y w L p N a1 U L Q O +Z C U C N � Q o ltA -0 +� v O L N N ai 0 m bb m In -0 L N (6 `� N 0 CO L 0 O C} Q> Q ai C aJ m +� N ltA C bz C M +� — aJ C b ul ul w� C6 E S N O C � O cn ai i U O ai +� aJ -0 VI N +� = ai Q 1 N U= C C C p U co .0 Q +� 0>> N O > C aJ L C6 +' co +� 0 U +� aJ aJ E J O O ,> C O > v C +' Co In O Q— O Co W O C VI G W U m aJ VI o W cc G aJ aJ `1 L +' v L CL L CL aJ L O= L CL (o aJ > L > Q Q (n Q) Q) v v � C -I--a -0> aJ C p — +- � co C 'i N >jm aJ CLO aJ N 0 aJ i CL N -0 (10 > a% L L O � c C t6 aJ oC O Q + C> + O aJ t6 V G > O -0 +� Co N V1 O U } aJ > Q N N O i > co 0 N M N v C J a) > N aJ > > v aJ aJ tLo QJ 0 0 0 C cn Y> C vaj E ai M O o- v — v +� > CL N co v C to v `� v 0O ate'' > O � N ai N ai aJ aJ aJ N C6 >` M i L N V QJ > v N aJ two ai 0 N -0 aJ c - N O aJ -0 co0 ai N O ci O t6 Q t�A C L CL > C O O m Q ai V nA C a' +� �n C to } L C N � E E ai W aj aj +, v v O .> 3 n v > N 3 O L o V Zo v 3 C L L E O N aJ 0 +, U C (6 — CSA L ai C N U 4- + j 'p L O +' N .� E L v C aJ •v p m tip t6 -0 0 U E N Co V 0 — L N Co L N N ai O VI VI Q •-, - U 0- O M U O O D C .� +� '� to E N> +, nA „ v v E C to L (o L U Z� aj v L N Q pp _0 N v v +� o ai ai W>-0 aj Q- > L Q VI >- i 0-0 m (� v U-0 L L M v v v co aJ O N v—'> > W Co (J a) . U N—E > U O w p) Ln CA Q QJ cn'N0 > � CN C C C ai t6 ca v C aJ O ai OL - 0 C aJ `� `n > F -Q C 0 C6 _ Q ai N 0 v p C p v U v C v N �i CSA > +' L 0 +' (6 (6 L a Ti Q > H '7A 7A > v Q cn co roo w U COQ -0 4- � vCi Co w • • C 0 O v L 0 E 0 4 - L Q) LU v v_ Q) > � v L o v o o o E N O N �' M aj Ln C6 C6 O v + v O 3 N O L N aj O OLU NQ� v nn v° `� Ya) Q o -0 QaiN aj -0 } OQ N +, -0 vvU M � - v v �,; �i co co Q co co +� N o L L OC v�U aJn °voo a vv C v +' H aJ C6L G >j W > aJ v N +nA m -0?> N U O +� w Q_ a) ` p X 3QL 0 O .� N W Ov M U aJ CSA aJ ai aJ O O 4 CO > OL C_ > aj U +-� W E> (6 U 4 - CO aJ N w O +' U O N N O aJ N>° c N� co O Y N Q_ m +- 4- N > O co > E OC O aJ � O w O O '� o m M M �, ai L Q_ a aj L U v E o +, Q Ln O O v>� o o O g Q- O E m s � 4 v-0 v L m +-j D -0 Vi U ai L v aj E Q_ a aj Q O L � M Q N N aj aJ N C6 aJ aJ N > H +, Lo vI O U p � nA � + U N ~ (6 N UJ e N aJ O N L O N aJ a Q o v > v L U> O N om— L QJ L OL viN +> 'OwN N °Co CLO w.wQ o v v aQj aj • • • ' LN> +,= > N o o NQ- Q_ Q_ E O > o°0 v Q Q o ° v o Q cc �� O av E U w 0 m D Q_- cr w m -0Q Qj v sQ_ L v Q r3 ai O a N O0 ai 0 aj ai U Q N L $ N O ck 4; u w0 "-- Q_ aJ v nA y U W � U cv > + o ca Q N � U O N (U -+S N E ri � o O v ai J O cU i c U +, c6 s 2 p > >OE N E v L +� Qj LOoM -0 o a io Q o '� Q u Q c � .Q o>CLO o Lo c nn Q O p 4- 0 Q vI M QJ Q U Q- L N G a--� w m Li N aj L L aJ a L a + v v X (6 nn qp +� O > v Q U *' a v w cn + aJ U +, > > p L to co -0 m CLO m U O Q O aJ Q aJ U O O N> .� v>' j Q O +' n *' Q o w0o c: >O v N 4- aJ > — `$ V i OL v Q w v N � O `� m L CLO � }> o p v co O In v a U i O L N N coo N p =O (10O °p �°° N nn U +� aJ 'v N " o>U ° c6 NU 0O N Q S � '� N w Q rz aj 4- Q, > +� w Q aj O M M L N 4- � >�- + Q _ Nv 4- U0 U M- o ' wO +- �co � �v QQ O O O M — Q O M MOCLO Q O;U 7 CL O S N U •� U U aj o 0 v, Q o v Q '� > '� w ca O 4- Q Q E Q Ln a~ 00 M Q -I-- '^ O N v rl 0 N A v v v v + O +, +, 4 > �, aj O O + n o v Q- o v + + O vL 0 0 aJ O p � � Q-0 O aJ aJ +' O i 3 H v4- O L cn L CC� N O L N N aJ p r, NO ca v ai Q ai O p nA Q Q Q u_ ai L -L 0 ai tin Q +' Q o c o O -P c o L C i`L o� N 3 O O c Q- u= v .� O N N vv v > °J n n +' > > O a, > O O v c-0 ro n -I-- �f , i J J i� J Mp c 0 CL U U U C3 a sin o° v a Q 0 0 c v C3 N U U N n3Q- v 4-j 4- _0 O Q v O nv -w O�'� -1--Q p p Q m v /, ca v4 C 4 -Z O v Q Lo v v cn Q H O v -1--Q a v -0 N N (6 L L aJO L O aj v v Q a--��' O n U Q> a O E aj v+ v vv v p o (6 E L Li C aJ QL o +� , N nA n= 4 — + c6 N N v L CO +' 4- > v 4- (6 Q O O .N v > O O v +- Q v v o o N E v o c ai v �, 3 �, p Q .� O v > v OL v L C6 v p O (6 CL , i J J i� J Mp c 0 CL U U U C3 a sin o° v a Q 0 0 c v C3 N U U N 3 v 0 0 o �^ i — -0 �-- o o N o 3 '� .L vnn Q v vC� Q (, N o- 0 O :2 Q (6 "1 0> N ,� 4- L.L > O Q N O +� L O cn N X O H o 0 v a Q- v Ln E v v m o v o O +' ° m LU ac -1--to c6 C:O ++ N v ai vv L Q ' v v 'v v O > o Q 0U co o o � v c w L E > O Q- v- o u Q- E N ^ v 't4 0 t4 O L tv S 0 0 0 m Ln °J o .Q 14 � c6 v U L nn v v ,-� +, +�^ O L O L `0 O -U v o Ln0 v � L O Qv �_ co Q O L n to v E m ^ Ln � u � '� m v OU � I �w f a� z � d Q o > c o v v E v v > o v -0 � ` v o w v v^ v 0> +, O I o 3 ,5 E o E v n L v v °' L � . � v Q) v Q } v v C a v +� O v 0 . oL V o 3 5 E � x 'v — 4- 4,5 U M 7a Co > U 0 L o v v cc coO G v C6 L + •N N N > E� v O O 4� m O O N L+ > -0 LJ v v v= N 0 — L a -- O U v � E LZ v ° O� 3 v 0 0 o �^ i — -0 �-- o o N o 3 '� .L vnn Q v vC� Q (, N o- 0 O :2 Q (6 "1 0> N ,� 4- L.L > O Q N O +� L O cn N X O H o 0 v a Q- v Ln E v v m o v o O +' ° m LU ac -1--to c6 C:O ++ N v ai vv L Q ' v v 'v v O > o Q 0U co o o � v c w L E > O Q- v- o u Q- E N ^ v 't4 0 t4 O L tv S 0 0 0 m Ln °J o .Q 14 � c6 v U L nn v v ,-� +, +�^ O L O L `0 O -U v o Ln0 v � L O Qv �_ co Q O L n to v E m ^ Ln � u � '� m v OU � I �w f a� z � d A o I � n O c a U V � x M ti A c N 3 p L `� v C Q c6 L O > v co U N N L v v m� v -0 0IlecQ o v *ac c J aJ a, 0 c° - Lo " v L c�Q v +� E n Q) v 0 > nen > v U L +� Q U L N X O QJ +� o QJ wN (6 N U pU Q) 0 Q v o • o a, cQ Ho v °' v v-0 w� > QJ O N M- It O L p0 un 3: > QDQ L +' m QJ aJ aJ > O O� O wQ VI L N E C6 ?– O O H L L CSA v Z O v +� aJ o °J " v v v Lo O cQ ajL� cr- Qj O oO m L QL Qv L Q Y aLJ O U O O `^ p M +J 2 — 61 E c � +, V� N L Q L Z 00 OM E O p Q O E Q > U U CSA QJ p C6 C6 C6 X O Y H L aJ L L a v L CSA N Q QJ N a OC aJ C6 aJ .� cv/I O cC: aj c6 L L L E 00 v n Q +� Q L L N U U U O L O +� IV L vvi c t6 co c6 c p aJ > L U N cQ (6O c . -I r -I c -I CO QJ Q U-0 m W Q L U Q Q U v Q p �_ I aJ OLo E L L L N o a, C6 H N a, N aJ X O aJ sem, aJ .v O aJ `� OQ UJ QJajt� E +' v v U (6 L C3 N N a aJ QJ QJ L O Q L V QJ Q X v aJ L E nn m `� E Q- � QJ Cr M U o aJ v v v L p �' v v O E u, �> O 0 O v E `� O Q Q O Nai L N c Q c' � L = QJ O L i6 QJ -0 O '.I.+ aJ N > C v a O C7 C6 aJ Q C6 a aJ O +� v aJ QJ > Z Q v aJ E v Q +� C i U d o N nA E E S CYC (U (L6 i -= O aJ CLO O N +� `� a N aJ Q O o J QJ Y > txo QJ L t1A aJ C7 N aJ N f6 c aJ (6 Q N N QI i +� LS >` Q - Z +, —" O C C6 U QJ E L L vI O C6 v L v v Z +i6 v v v 0 C6 Q .� Q _ aJ v v v � o � o � � E � •� n � � � o v a .� v � � � o Q 1 .� L p .� aJ QJ OC .L QJ +, O +' O N C6 C6 C6 E aJ U Lo ui (uO aJ (6 aJ > (6 Q Q Q v v L a v O QJ U� 0 c o v c v o '� c o o saJ 'G L ON �A 0CC Q—vE aJ J iv pv QJ �OoU UQJ+,O4p 0WE L = -1-- avCv6J �o o ov > o -0 E n v O aJ o o > O v nO N O O4- -J 0 c _I-_ O= C cr vv NO (6 (6 O O N O b0 c U +-� W L cn (J Q) O c N +� U aJ Q L N u •� o v E v E ~ o Q ai QJ v o C o 0 v a, 0 0 0 0 0 ai m> 0 v g 0 N N VI' v v v nA Uj CSA v L c6 a N c6 O L— 0 �O > N N CSA Q N N N N Q- O CL Q N N N N > 1 Lo (U ai L VI Q L N N N Q (V > Q L U (V N ° (V O (6 (6 O v cr 0 v N Q- = v v �; v v v v N° v Q- QJ QJ LO o c6 x ai N u s= o n nQA N j nA Q w v M N N— C00 Q- d c6 �Y J L U— C6 >� Q N N N O O E C v L Q Q nA N N- o w Q Q N •> �, Q Q v 4- QJ U Q (u Q nA L QJ Y U W N� O L N L Q ^ o N N +� VI L � m-0 Q a Q v c6 O s= s= QJ XO N O Lo N nn N •C ° ° C) s= +� c6 O N E Q v L +' o O °' v '� o `^ `^ Q- O� v v E o O -0 Q c6 `~ '� vi U cn Q zs � +- c ° v Y +-� Co CLOm CLO Q U_ ° (V Q (V c6 (u QJ QJ U Q N L c6 L U N N Q O O N QJ L m �i .v }, Q •Q Q O E Y O Q O '> N '� +� N nA L +' +' Q Q- c6 U N U N L L O QO N 0 Y O i O N N O N '� Q Q �--Q Q �j Q Q Q' c6 Y _Q d E N _ QJ v O Q- v v N Q 0 'Lo c � +� O 4J v O + O Q Q E .Q c6 Q _CO +' U o o ai N Q v Cw �_ Cw o QJ U E v Y Y U Q N U U>,c N VN N N Q CLO CLO C6 C6 L N> •L av'' i N > Q m N > > • • • • • .� �. N CO CO 4- +� N� N � L +, Q N � lD Q vi Y Q O v 4-_I-_ L> >- v v v> v N Q (6 N Z Q v of > i qp N N° C6 N O > Q CSA •� V v Q Z a Q C L > CLO Q v w `–^ �n �n d O N N> u Q- N le ML +' •N Y c6 Q v Y N N c6 W VI X m N Q aj — CL aj W Q aJ N N O Q +� c cp U Z N v 0 O s= C6 O O c G ` Q- Q s= .� °cn' s= N ° c cn O O N Q +- cin Z co 2 N (31 t6 t6 W Q ca v v N o O N aj v� o •N Q� a °' v Q v Q -0 Q t6 NLo 0 +� (U I'D O-0 +, ;n 4- +, u 1 v +- v s= �, s= v s= v v v Q v v Y v v v> v 'x v v v W p M •� m w m >. U m O 0 E N O0 v N ca N O w- L Q Q Q O U O N Q N N Q O N� Q Q L r' �^ v Q v Q M Q Z v o E ("V -M u L -L v N qj ON v N N N N Q pNj N W Q .`^ ',n QJ N (6 v c6 aJ = Cw v U +� s= c v .� v M c O Q o0 N Q `^ N U Q O Q a Q W c6 N M 4- N Y N N vI Q cv/Ico vI Q N •� Q> Q V Q Q- ° vI V N � N O M 4- Q O L V > v N -0 N LJ N N un E> p o CL o Q> v Q v° v °� O W Q cn H Q O H Q c6 aJ aJ o U L N 1 C7 L c v —_ U (V L Z U C'6 > L U Q N N a' c6 Q N N >j O >j I� O N O MIN E Q +� N cn � L cn Q- c 'QJ Q _� M Q +a Q C o M N � n > p m w� CLO Q� > v-� E 4CLO E 0 N v nn v Ln L v � co b2Q W L ; W •0 � � v U 0 nA N � t6 i 'CLO X v w Q) 3 ro ro N J MU > O CL x v I Q) v o c Q) L r v N m U E O Q Q L v � � O �n 0 N aM U Co J Q) —i LL N L L n n X v w_ = v L c6 >. Ln v o a L N L CL I v Q) Ln n L G � N vi Q) Q o N i X c QL LU v v m n U -0 t6 '} = v O +, U Q Q oN nn .� L) v 0 CO C,6 0 H W a z cc W Q W 0 a W 2 Z W cc W W H.C)- N O v O 7j a, � v v O Q —o Ln p� 7 > v CLO v v - v v `� v E � z� v w i i0 p VI aJ Q_ aJ Q' + C6 v U `� > E 0 O H> N> O O L .� N U t6 C6 0� v L -C p 4- Q aJ N n a) v� nA L 4-Q_ mO N• O v v °� o +' f v 0 '� + VI Q N v E O d +r > v � + Q_ > +� Q +' Cl O N U +� L N n3 42 Q N ai Q -0 E aJ N o N v y N 4 +, � U 4- v O E O O a n3 v v O p m Q_ L v N Q E O E LU . N L v -C n +' v o ma N N v v z vci� > L w o L E -a LZ Nt- -0 OV o ai '� v Q L o v p `n a 0L.L Q U '` vO a" O U � > r�^o>E -a •Q v (6 O�O> Lo W v F, N O v H.C)- N O O 7j a, o v O Q —o Ln p� NN —° v v - `� � z� O�o_v3n i i0 p VI aJ Q_ aJ Q' + C6 U `� N 0 O H> N> N m O L .� N U N C6 0� v -C p 4- Q aJ N n a) v� nA L 4-Q_ mO N• N N v v °� o +' f v + VI Q L v E O d +r > Q_ + Q_ > +� Q +' Cl O N U +� L N n3 42 Q N ai Q -0 E aJ N o N v y N 4 +, � U 4- Qj v Q O E n3 O p c6 +� v v + LU . N L v -C n +' co m a -- L N N v Ovv O vci� > L L a1 nU >v Ovvv Nt- -0 OV ai N NU > '` vO a" O ai ul v > r�^o>E -a m O�O> Lo W v F, N O v Op _E +- � Q Q Q} O N p L O + E ai j- ai O N C X n3 '� N O N 00 Z W Q_ aJ E > w n3 aJ O V n3 U Q_ M C7 '— cc v v X +' O L N + v L +' N Q O Q E E w v Q W C6 N C6 0 p Q_ .p +1X f6 Q_ C6 p Ov aJ N W C6 U ai > aJ O '�, +� N V i ul aJ X 'N N N C6 C Q C6 Q C6 .L Q aJ O 4 t6 v Z nn cn +, a, N> CLO +, o v C:.� n3 Q U v bA n3 Q N v L >+ N + Q N m m>> N aJ C6 N +' Q O (u O N H aJ p C6 aJ v E ai L +-� a-' Q- � i N N Q O N W 's. Q) � v v N v Q t6 Q v QJ QJ L QJ L O Q M M v QJ V U v N '� (6 lD N o aj v �Evv *IC � 0> OL 00aQvcJ > Q w QJ pWm O U W aJ o Oc + Qd_,�_�vO��ai v � 0 o 4- 0 v N N v QJ M W QM nQJ v o ° c0 Lo o v QJ o O �o o o � ° °JO+ o o v m v -Cv +' v v '� O p QJ �� Q p U Q C Q m m N� � p L v z 4n v 4 p Q CLO 0 � � c � v un ° E I, v L O w E .v L ° O U LJ 0 N U ° vI L O O U C6 O a L O L N Q) + cvi� +, Q) •QJ L Q +� QJ Q Q C6 C6 — O M + VI CLO v o vV �v o +� EQ Q 'L a- _ p v -0 W O U OjQ _ U L L X N° o ° N O- m LO v p v V +� N nn i N O > Q Q U O-0 > L U W Q a'•' Z C6 `� +, N L �--� QJ U Q L O Q) VI (6 Lo -0 N QJLo E W '� +' CLO � •�, 4- E a--� CC QJ O Q Q) V N Q •?> > m p (Q6 QJ ?� � QJ V QJ cn L CL6 VI X U +, W � � 4 � QJ N +� Q L np +, 4- 0 U� p� QJ L N Q° U p p +, � CSA QJ c Q) Q -0 QJ 4- QJ ?j (6 OU .- QJ Q c Q NJ N Q- U � (6 cn m N - N > LJ QJ p Q > p > � ul Q > +N N W Q (6 Q ?� cn L = m (6 Q4- Q- 0- 4- VQJN a) (U Q- O m � QJ E c O °wO° 0ac U3 H N rA 6 Coc6 Qv MQ+QJ 0 Q) v O v Q) Q) � � QJ o ca CL v O Ln Co C CLO QJ +� +'N - ' O QQJ v QJ O npL> (AA 4=� CJA W U N p CA U Q- U +1 CLO -C w — vO +v, v p Qv v o J � L �� �, v o Q o� +, (U v m QJ O C6 ° QJ VI O � O VI LO QJ QJ Zn+�i L QJ V1 Lr1f� Zn It 4- +� N — ci O QJ .L m QJ QJ N M _ +� _ Q � W 00 p Q — C6 C6 c -I 4- i o O +- O v t6 p QJ QJ C3 O Q Lfi 0 � QJ � Q- O C6 N N N X L } O C6 LJ mC6 O N N CSA L> Q. QJ QJ N v L ° L N X i cn +� (6 X N O (6 � +, +, 0 -0 y NC6 C6 U O ?� Q a p L N U •� O ° � O � cn QJ s= O E Q_ N QJ O N QJ lD i �_ C6 U O QJ ti QJ Q +� Q} QJ QJ L QJ QJ O O VI QJ p U .- > v N Q U p +' > > O -0 -0N _I—_ Q +- Q . � -I— q— CO Ov � v v N v Q t6 Q v QJ QJ L QJ L O Q M M v QJ V U v N '� (6 lD N o aj v �Evv *IC � 0> OL 00aQvcJ > Q w QJ pWm O U W aJ o Oc + Qd_,�_�vO��ai v � 0 o 4- 0 v N N v QJ M W QM nQJ v o ° c0 Lo o v QJ o O �o o o � ° °JO+ o o v m v -Cv +' v v '� O p QJ �� Q p U Q C Q m m N� � p L v z 4n v 4 p Q CLO 0 � � c � v un ° E I, v L O w E .v L ° O U LJ 0 N U ° vI L O O U C6 O a L O L N Q) + cvi� +, Q) •QJ L Q +� QJ Q Q C6 C6 — O M + VI CLO v o vV �v o +� EQ Q 'L a- _ p v -0 W O U OjQ _ U L L X N° o ° N O- m LO v p v V +� N nn i N O > Q Q U O-0 > L U W Q a'•' Z C6 `� +, N L �--� QJ U Q L O Q) VI (6 Lo -0 N QJLo E W '� +' CLO � •�, 4- E a--� CC QJ O Q Q) V N Q •?> > m p (Q6 QJ ?� � QJ V QJ cn L CL6 VI X U +, W � � 4 � QJ N +� Q L np +, 4- 0 U� p� QJ L N Q° U p p +, � CSA QJ c Q) Q -0 QJ 4- QJ ?j (6 OU .- QJ Q c Q NJ N Q- U � (6 cn m N - N > LJ QJ p Q > p > � ul Q > +N N W Q (6 Q ?� cn L = m (6 Q4- Q- 0- 4- VQJN a) (U Q- O m � QJ E c O °wO° 0ac U3 H N rA 6 Coc6 Qv MQ+QJ 0 W Q) v CLOv _I_ -O a) v ° — v v o n (U = >3 O v ^> v, OU L N w L v O M N +nA cwof6 ° U Q Q N aJO O Q- +' N N QE Q N v U c6 -0 Q)= aJ 2 . V � E > o O :2cn t6 > � a > w nA -0cQ6 � `� 4-C v U (Q6 � -0 aJ � . v Q-A) L a) O Q V v L a— - L 0 - v omu u n�� va Q Q aJ Q C a) O_ LA a v e aJ U c -I N ° O aJ v vi t6 D `� c: L N a aJ Q O co aJ > N U O> L E +� v E v > o O N ^ aN' aJ 4- coo Q O w O> U E Q- v> Q N Q Co tao C L Q +M Q °(Q6 Q aJ N aJ (10 Lo L > a N U L C Q CLO Q O N -a O C U O Q Q Q �O N o (10+-a) Q c6 v Q O , M v co v Q -0 � Q o U n , � aj co E .E aJ +, c6 N v Q c6 L Q oi -0v L Q Q v Q ai HQJ m ri c�i c m -s- OU wo .� H -i _ 4- L O *' L a + O N 1 Q- Q -0(6 U Q (6 OC L U (� C)- u .c O Q� Q Q -0-0 m° Q Q a v O L O Q- a — '� aJ L +� cn O *' aJ N aJ — U Q N (6 vi FCUQ- O p �O N O N c)- E (u (� Q v Q f6 N Q v Q v E +� W v U Q v 0 aJ Q cu 2- uQ Q L — m 0_-o ° v v > aJ Q w cn +, Zai cun Q- W O � v ° Q — " -0 w Ln c v Q m v } Nv o O c6 o aJ I N 0 aJ N CO V U N W d v U —O �-� o v .Q' C6 Q Q N 0 V S L N� 0 U O� cn O H aJ > Q Q Q t6 .� i Z N >' > CSA +' (u aJ O -0 o � v — CSA Lo4- — a (U Q W VI > — - 'pQ > .Q LU> 4->= m O _I_- Q m aJ o v v U v N vE Lu (u (,o C-0 v cn v U Q L� -cQ Q -I-- �E Q —J cn 4- M +1 O LL +� d U M 4- 0 M Q O (6 0 v 0 E 0 v nn v v v LU 0 N �i cid L 0 N U-0 � I , -0 1 CLO C6 U v v N v v v + Q t= O � L N -0 L.L O C6 +� Q O L VI O +' N `� = > N N O CSA O �^ N C N +, O N N (6 m N L N U N v v XLo D C6 Q v V W -0 +' N cn N > 0 07 O U i Q O v v Q QJ 7a ai O NN '� p Up p Q Q i Q- > vQ vLo C6 Q Q a--� L Lo N U = m� O L U N v v Q E L v° �' v -0o = Q- Q o E ,} 0 Lo 0 3 v Q o v E v = Q un O v o o v v 3 N N v o O N 1 a (6 0 (6 O M U N N N N n v L E a o o v 3 o v n-0 v " v ° > vO > Q m mC6 E 7 U •Lp v O ' QJ 4- E �oO A Na - 6 O L N M L N t= N .� O t= V N> +cn L •C Q Q NO +moMvO E E Q v Q N CO U 4- x CLO (u o Ln CLO Ln .� H U o O v O 0 4- 0 N LU 4-- UQj C7 H Q o �, c° o v 'Q • v c6 = =300 v > Q N -c 4-1E - w>, C6 � ca c6 ^ Q- (u Q O �n ON o N v Q 0 1•� N N Q N v Q N CU Q N L S `� o cn ° 0 v N C v v N N N CSA U aj •l= LL 0 L L N E ._ Q Q (/� + > Q N O> N N +� +� to + N N wQo o rz u v �� Q= m (U o v v v o un Q v OLU Cw N N Q -0 N Q O CL CO 0 v v E O Q 4- v U o +- Q_ +' 0")-0O o O v + + v v N 0 CU N ON o t= N O N v N v +, C6 m N Q+ L U CSA m O° _ N 'N -0'v a E M N `^ 0 L O LO > v NCWMCL v Q m dJ Q in U +' O N Q cn C Q Qjv O .� Q = E N O N Q N O N—� �O O N N Q > L '� Q N N Q L N Q- OL C6 O Q v o v Q M -0 CCON OO -1--+ > O ' OU N m E L U N E >i U Q > U Q) 4- 4- Q) +, Q 'v v v O Q E O Ln Ln v x O n Q m 0 N L�1 I Q) v N v v N L L Co -1-- °o v O c6 v nA N ,� (V v E I v v U L v° =— n of O E +' N c N ° N N -P ?: !- N N -I--cn Q- 4 •U > N V O = v c6 > _J J +1 -c6 -0 O +, � a + X N w O O L Ec6 Q N �O J _I_ Q v O M O +J (6 _ Q v + N Q •M v 0 i +' Q ttA 16 -0 to O Q N N +' v L O 'N '� v c6 vi O ?: O Q N � (D> — i E VI +, Q N L Q E 0 Q Q N p— ?� 0 O +� U 4- c6 v 0 E v Ln O •� N v N U •� -0 Q Q V O L O- N CSA N v-0 > O L +� �^ CSA U 4— U N U Ln �° Q O 4- Q v Q +' i Q 2 U) U c �O + vi > CLO `� CLO rr O o .N E N N N CLO a> 'C 4- O .0� O�- > N V N L v + Q T U L L VI +vi a--� Q a --i > , co > > a a--� c ro N N Q°Lo Lo Q N Q O� •V n° N Q v 3 U v Q o U �; v Q- v v v N p Q �' c6 v N hA N o +' p m •N QJ N v o -° o o v v N O Q 4-> U N •N C� N O CSA ap Q v v O N nA U L v v v m O>� o N QJ N L Q Q i v U � � -0o N �^ `v p cN/I � M zs O Q 4J 4J vO N L v VI � J c6 Q CSA Q Q (Q6 > � Q N c6 v +, Q U I N v o v—�� `� Q � N ai N v> X N v N �-I o 4- c6 O C6 N U =_ N Q � CLON .- Q O v N L N CLO N C6 +� +, N +, o N Q Nct� L N �O O> N N w N VIN N N� '^ a p > v N + L Q- L N °} O C5 N L cn Q a c6 L O ci ~ E ON N .v Y L QnA (6 N Q i ?: N (V O L +QL v ' N ai N v N QQ v ONp v O +' QQ ai L vN UN Q ztt � > 1 �Q Q) v •X M Jov v) >� Q o o- ' I N v L O c6 � Q (V I LL O *—' v (U � c v �; D N N W L G 4 •U V O = -X J 4O Q O _I_ 4- w v cn Q L (V •L Q O Q +J v v 0 i c6 U v E ?: O No- O � (D> v Lo +� v 4- c6 v Q v 0 o Q v p v N CSA O U v L }p Q L 4- Q ra :21 i N % 'C 4- O > -1-O v CLOc6 `~ + Q v> U E 4- N O N C E U v Q N v N o -I-- v o N p Q �' c6 N hA N •.p +' p N i QJ v 0 n v N N v _ v v v v O Q o N v v o O Q �n CSA v � � -0o N �^ Lw > p cN/I � M zs O c6 OL vO U J D W J U m i v L Q �n 0 N I O N v 'v Q) 0 Q. .N v E O Q E v v 4- G _ U v n i Q_ N Q vv) ON o O v W2 'o v > Q- v + - Q Lm " o�� O E t, Q v v v3 v `6 Q U 3 > L N > c O cn U v a --i t= C6 E v C6 Q iQ S Q v > > > U CLA (V `a (V a--� v N CSA C6 - v o u L —_ V L L ) O F,3 N N ai O v N aj O VI +� N N C > N N > +� N `6 CE6 N CL `6 U V E > v N-0> QJ uA N=, `6 = x C6 O O a Ln+ p v N Q } O Ov N U O Q t6 N ul Q)-0 N O O O Q ON +� N *' > Q U `� N O N `6 CSA N-0 E N *' cu) E L — CSA E -� CSA U O OO -0L +-j ' +- > C: O `a C >Q O +� _v aIN Lr1 O Q N +, O N Qj N N +rp U O v 0 +� c cn O a ° o `ra o � `Qa `� 3 v .Z O v L N N to O O N V U _ +� i v +�tLo OQ > N N v N N N E C W c W C `0 L w C w> S ~ Q v Q O U p L U Q_ .� v N 'U O +� � a--� p Ov bb to QL Q) Q v U E Z p f +, `a O `Qa >j Q N N o Z O o o> s N v `a 'N N O L Q i+ O>> `a `a J� J Q — U D V (6 +' L N > ' m N-0 Y O O O v �, Q a N N v O +, U U x E Y N L Q Q — a --i > � `a U 0 aN' O Ca U (U > O v Q_a C6 to p N v N > O Ca CO L '� >` � O N lA — .O C6 L `a `a +� QJ VI L p> v E> `6 L +� In D v N `a (n Q UA E O CLO aJ c L N .c v � Q Y N Q U aJ J CLO LL `a W Q_ L c `a +, v U v N •> U Co L O C L — t= — -0 to `a -0 VI o L +' > v c v U `a m o C ra Co N n- v O Q o v E p Ca L U O N '� d N >, w -a QL � E +� +' L N Oaj QJ N QJ ,w CSA N p a- E a--� (V L •- L N ° L Ca + N Q > (a ° U > — aJ LJ Q v � nA v ro `6 v +' (A v in N O vii > � ° v H .� Q +, v n ON o O v W2 'o v v nA Q +' N Q> Q nA `6 Q U 3 > L v > c O cn U v a --i N U O v 4- v - E v p > 4- S C6 d > > > U CLA (V `a (V a--� O W L - v o " �, L —_ V v o v O v N L O VI +� +' N C > N N � +� N `6 `6 U V E > v N-0> QJ uA N=, `6 = x O a Ln+ p v N Q } O Ov N U O Q t6 N ul Q)-0 N O O O Q ON +� N > o O E — 0 N *' cu) E L — CSA N CSA I — U O OO -0L +-j ' +- � C: U >Q C) Ile o _v aIN � O Qj �a IN +rp > Q) 0 a toN Qj a °> .Z O Q_ O O a c A UOL OQ N N � W NvO N `aQ S Q_ v Q U p L E 4- O LJ ,} v O d QL Q) Q v U E Z p f +, `a O `Qa >j Q N o Z H s N v `a 'N N _ C6 L Q i+ o `a J� J N — U D V (6 +' L N C6 E cr " Q N-0 v x v �, Q N Z Ca Q O v O � O-0 — a --i > � `a U 0 aN' O Ca U (U > O v vi W OC C N O v > � v 4- m� (�6 Ca N ,} O L a--� N Q- CLO � � 4- v O) v v> N .c � � Q Y N > Co .— JO J CLO LL W Q_ W � CD 6 ) � m a E \ CLO 0 $ § 2 Q _ m 7 = u w ) .[ / \ m [ ƒ ƒ 2 j 7 m COW § 3 Ln c 2 /c o % m 4 ? 3 2 U o $ m E ® 0 CL -\ /jE » a)0 Co mk / 0 -0 \ •� § / $ ± Lo q 2® 0 2 $ -I-- 2 t o E 2 / » k 2x f ƒ 20-2k uu E E» n E m n § / / i / ƒ u % v� o 4--Q-& u Q- 0 R ) n E m n u E \ ®).� k \ •2 § 2 E � n / i \ CD 6 ) � 4- aJ I N N a iN � X 4- � > aJ L aJ O N +� (U 0LLIco N Q .0 O i QJ LJ +� C6 Q H 3 ON bA aJ N aJ �_ N W E v v o v +, U N aJ LJCLO N Q O w>_ ~ ° Q N M v X `G X p —J aJ N aJ � Q U aJ Co '> O W L aJ U OJ v v aJ U aJ Q> O v C:> � Q- +1N (o Q N a � (6 � .c CLO� � � � � � aJ aJ Q � aJ QJ p O v +, N (o W a +, aJ +, O L > p L N >� Q Co CLO N O W (o aJ X >� � +' v w to -0 d Q O O +� Q N .- aJ aJ >- u L `^ aJ Q Q D aJ E Q C6 N m aJ N 0 aj W aJ Q 0 L° O � V v� Q N U U cLo v •� pC O E '� N aJ CSA .Q O v Q aJ N p U +' N v to � v to CLO LUO> nA LQ O°OQ O +N N 'H� N N >O L > +- -C N aJ Q- N+ONJtQ A O aJ LJ aJ E 0 U E Z aJv O c v �E Q w� " O :- -5 -1-- aJ E Q NvN OO o = 41 E O - .0 c-0CN6 +OU� -•0 vN LV v No v 0 + WE w v v v v > QY c 0aJ :v" v O c CLOQ (U 0 °w No� �O-0Q LJJQ�LaaJJ +� N L" U >. aJ aJ N -0aJ UO fQ6 U > c OU +' +' > CLO C � O aJ L N c a aJ co co aJ O 4- N > O W O U U N CLO o- O Q- a -•i > L L� L U aJ U W CLO v aJ O H O '� aJ Z XQ aJ N C�> +•) U LJ N •� L Q CSA v% L 4- Q N J v O S v co i o t= .� .0 �> O V L Q aJ +' V Q U aJ N> O (o QJ JO txo > aJ N LO U O aJ W m Q O um E cco aJ G > Q v '�, aJ N N > +� N nA N D Z aJ N aJ Q N N> � Q N +� Q co � aJ N Z C Lo c aJ aJ m E +, aJ m aJ Z cn LJ o i°QQ X o> a, oEm? U .cL w o vo v + O i L v O N vi aJ L `o aJ N L co > v c > aJ C: aJ U v N CLO O Q Q aJ O i co +� '� N co > �O 0 cU W Q OL CLO U Q U N aJ 4 C X cr v>� v c -I fa CLO c aJ U N > U S T, .N .— aJ Q p N O 4O W aJ '� Co > .� ON 4- N X +J O X N aJ � a f6 N C t1A t= t= aJ t= a, 'L aJ CLO ����. o- mm Qv a, s= m4- o -0J o �' �'l� O� +, L � >-a E O nnO— } ON C Q O aJ N co aJ C Q U Q U ° aJ �' N 0 co �' ai CLO ul LJ � E .N Q aJ 'N +, Q '� aJ +� O Q N L aJ Q O CSA aJ +� N Q aJ aJ aJ a t= ° aJ LA aJ O 4- Q aJ t= L L O O O U +� > U Q N aJ +, N W > aJ " +' c�i� o CLO aJ O aJ L Q > Q Q Q aJ aJ co v Q� aJ aJ Z o w W v v C M � XCLO > LU f6 Q aJ N �' 4— O L N U— a Z > N O �ai Lo_ O ca Q aJ �"� ° aJ ° •� >, a --i � O (� X v v v O X CSA > O N Q aJ L aJ (o Q W O > Q N O O N N O N E JO 4- N aJ Z v O O O LJ Q ° N 0 EL >> N nn u, a, ov E Q- C aJ +(,' -a O aJ ai U c O M aJ -C NQ UQ 4- O s= N o U +- O }° N N v NN Lo ' .- > OO ° N av NaJ W `lJv aJ -C 0O JNO X O vo O aJ ai EG) oE �_ C N Lu V aJ L N N +� Q Z ° N L v +'�, +� p O aJ N L aJ +� s= (p W +1 +, aJ w Q aJ co O N +, t= t= U i N W W U f6 t= ° Q N L +� N U O— N t= aJ i $�' O QJ C6 O 'v aJ Q aJ OU Q '�, N aJ W V > c '� aJ aJ O O O Q m aJ C aJ O U (31 � O W s= s= aJ w aJ LO Q C]A '� aJ NO +' aJ cU co CSA > 0 aJ +' � Z OU O � N Q � +' aJ to � aJ aJ aJ N N N N c U (o N N U Q aJ L +' O V v aJ aJ O O Q > X� N > X C� O > N O 4- O X m CLO 4- '� '� .� L Q m > aJ U L aJ aJ aJ C 0-12 -0 > N co U aJ — U co m A I On c O N Q) Y —� __ v v Q) N n _ v- Q O 4- O v ra O +' Ca E L ' ,, N M v > 1 Q U +O +L-, Q) N -1 a� M c a� (V Q p O v L U v L ~ M Q ai +' (V CSA — O U N N O N N v Q O a--, N v w v L O Tj N +' 4ai _ � VI ?> U > N U N N CSA N�-� > Q >, �, c +� L N L VI 0 O > N N ,� U N +�-, E +-, L-0 N U p� Q C6 O a� a� N N N. V N N Q- p c O 0 L N N N '^ E — U N Ca C6 Q U X p CSA > +� C6 1 +� U— L M *' O +' C6 W Ca 4— c O + N N ?j M V) + O C6 v ut N Q > L (V >j N N `� v O O Q Z O O L> V N N L QO CSA U >_ 3 w OL v U °= L t6 L M �' } > nn ° '-P cn V, L N Q +' v v � + v E o .� c Ca N =-0 m LA + .� N .- cr O v v ca N L O - ?� .� H> O O J $ d CLOCa M o Q >N O N N Q N OCLa >- Q O > 4- QL p N _ p N v v O N o O Q Q OV Q au CLO W v CLOv �vaNLM N p— +� L� L N Co .� C QO +' O v O v O C6 � O > '> 6O Q N (a w v CO O O C Q -0 CLO ai Q Q Q= Fj v U qp +� N m � Qai +, LVI v c +� aL Y N of W m Q Q a� N C]A v (�6 v -Q •Q O U a� O N v C]A M v N X •- } VL Vt C]A Q L L j i O J .� N +- v > `� cn �6 Q L Q L CO Q N U + t6 > t= Q O a� `^ qp CSA Q E O Q Q N N N Q +, O v LA 0 N �' O +� N D +-, • M C ra +� CSA Co Q Q c�i� N N O ZS +� v N J N N p Q CO O N m Q `~ O } N •Q L �_ v X a N p • LQ L N O Q t= C6 L np >� t= > W v vul Q N .1 CSA N +� O 1 X N O> O N CSA UA C i E Q)> a L v> m' N v 0 U O w� V v v Q> O Q = ca LJ v U m U o� m U v N O O v N> Vv L N Ca W N +' P Ca > O Q In M �; C6 In C6 > M X +' N> O N > c�i� Q- ca N N N t= L — N N Q- U (6 W O � U +-' N N Q ._ +-, (a t= O J N O +, Ln a, p Q L ``� Zo L O v v� N w t= N N N O O J +- Ud> m N t= N u) ate--, Q N a� � N0 LO aL N ai I cU m O �O � aj +1 U M U L N v +- O Q0-1-- v ai Q - Q O Q > O +� v L ut t= +, (a t= p CSA CSA N U N L Q- VI O O v> Lo > Q> N i Vf v `� — (a Ca N Q N� Ca •N N t= CL6 Q v c Q (a G CLO t= '� 0 N Q N a--, > U = VI O L O .L a� CSA a--, O +' ate--, N a"i O Q ra aJ c (a � N Q Ca N > Q ra G Q (, ut E N N w Q aw `� X Q 'vI Q 3 J +' .� Q J Q O Q X la X a' N> Q v v d v L Q N L o ca N Q W ca Q m N 2 +' CSA U +' N x N +' +� v +- O CSA CSA v N c> v a� v> (Q6 J U N OC L +� VI y Q O N N N O Q Q N .� Q N N O +-, Q Q p 0> � >� > = ate- N N S +M-, Ov �_ Q N v N v N �_ ro 0> O O } v O v +' ate- i v v .L v N .� > a� U VI W — VI a L VI a� L E - > L a� 0 N �i N Q) Y —� +' v — v v ra C. d n _ v- Q -0 v `—^ -0 O +' Ca E L ' ,, v > N > Ca Q v i• v N M c U O N LO ~ N Q ai +' N O U O N O N Q O N v > v } a✓ +' 4ai _ � VI VI U N N Q L VI > N O N U p� Q N a� a� N N N. V N N Q- O 0 t= N N '^ E — U v> LA p CSA > +� 1 +� U— L L VI C6 W L Ca Q O L (V N v Ca O v O L> +� > O Q O >_ w OL v U °= L t6 L M } > nn co N cn V, n N Q v L v `� (6 =-0 m O Q m .- cr v $ U M o Q >N O v N OCLa >- Q O M ? N p N _ O >L Q OV - �vaNLM A L O C N Q > '> 6O Q w Q - m � Qai LVI O= Cl -a EO UU :2 > m -Q •Q OO O +' N ? jQ L-0 Ca > VL Vt NQ (10v +- p teCLO M N O >CN O O v N -I- +- Cr E 0 - 0 N Q W i O N • LQ CQLCa QOQ (a NVI NN i E a m' � w� M v Q O Q = O -UW iO v O L +- Vv O NU U o O X +, N Q Q a -W p N Q SA L N > O ?> N N N t= L — N Q- O U> fa (6 W O �O im-, � U +-' N N Q ._ +-, (a t= O > J N O +, Ln > p Q L ``� Zo L W 0 N v v� N w t= o J p CSA t= N L O J Lo m N t= N u) ate--, Q N a� � LO aL J N +-, N � O U CSA U U L O Q v p N V v i Ca - Q v Q � Q OOoocwo m w L C, - N L t= a) Q- Q `� � Q V X 4 - p N CLO t= '� N a'' > U C CLOV t= N v O N Up Ca .L N W Q Q Q v aJ c Q N C�6 VI G v Q) 0— L _ a O v G W U > W > d U Q Q 2 Q '�., m +�., 2 J U 0 N �i o � � O Q nA U v p+nA 'cn c6 O ,L U O N N N-0 o � J- v v nn +, -0 > 2 c �� '� v ro Q) 4- O > N v Q• v c O v 3 v o v v Lu v N L m > m N° to M O N hA ) > N O c Q-0 4- Q + N O nA — ?� c6 c6 Q CL c N 'v m v o v H Q) Q N�> Q C v vo +, nn E o v o v .� 0 0 Q N c v v w V w o 'N o + x o E v o 4� �, O Q w -- v Do4- u v +' v v v v o txo +� Q) n CL 3 v v M+ v 0 i O -1- i v v O Q O Q QQL " O L v > O (co,- Q- -F, O-0 >� c0 Q) _ w } v N v av v o LO vU c °� c 3 L +-i N O O - 0 4- Q c6 E O> m> co) - u0 UN OV O N CLO > 4- O O � v Q> Q N c6 • V > V N Y L O N o o O E o +, v o 'v 'N v> v o ou CLO 4 - CLO Q) v W C6 cV/I u O U O Zv} vc��6 v v vii O� Q L O L L v Q- v o _+„ °J nvn ° v L ° O o X L 4 v C C)- E Q X ac 4 � v v W Q v v� -I-- v JN Q-0 Q >` N v L N O > x v nvn OQ Q> Ul m o v w H LL Y Q Q O > of X N O > W v v 0 0 o� L � v N N c6 Q v v +' O 0 O Q v L v v °c Q - Z 4- nA M > -COv -0 Q = c6 0 v v 3 VVMC West Wing CUP Executive Summary - Traffic & Access March 19, 2015 Master Plan Traffic Impact Study The Town of Vail (TOV) approved the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan in March 2015. As part of the review and approval process, VVMC prepared a comprehensive Traffic Impact Study (TIS) that addressed traffic impacts and mitigation for each different part of the Project construction sequencing. The TIS was prepared by Turnkey Consulting LLC and is dated 9-30-14. The full TIS is attached to this summary. West Wing Changes Affecting Traffic Flow & Site Access The following traffic -related changes will happen as part of the VVMC West Wing reconstruction. 1. Increase in building size. The West Wing will increase in size, but this will be mostly due to increasing the size of medical clinics that are currently in cramped quarters. There will be small increase in the number of patients and employees. 2. Reduction in the number of parking spaces in the West Parking Lot. There are currently 106 parking spaces in the West Lot. Construction impacts will reduce this to 97 parking spaces. 3. Change in the location of parking for various site users. During the early part of construction of the Campus West End, VVMC will change the location of parking spaces for different site users. Currently, all patron and guest parking is located in the West Parking Lot, which is accessed via the Main Entrance on West Meadow Drive. Currently, all employee and staff parking is located in the East Parking Structure, which is accessed via the gated access on the South Frontage Road Access. The current proposal is to swap these parking locations such that patrons & guests will use the South Frontage Road and park in the East Parking structure, and employees and staff will use Meadow Drive to Park in the modified West Parking Lot. There are two reasons for this change. First, patrons and guests will not need to drive through and park in a work zone. Second, this will reduce the amount of VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive. West Wing Traffic Impacts VVMC trip generation will increase slightly due to the increase in building size, but not all these trips will travel to/from the site. VVMC currently uses off-site parking to accommodate employees that cannot be accommodated by on-site parking. With the reduction of available on-site staff parking after West Wing construction, the overflow will be accommodated by off-site parking. So employee trips will increase slightly but some of these trips will not access VVMC by motor vehicle. If a scenario occurs where more patient parking is needed on-site, then additional employee parking spaces will be assigned to patient parking. This would create a need for more employee off-site parking spaces. Page 1 of 4 The net effect of the proposed changes are summarized below. The VVMC traffic volumes used in these calculations are based on traffic counts conducted on Tuesday, February 4th, 2014. These traffic counts represents a typical weekday at the VVMC during the peak winter season. Decrease the VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive by 19% (AM peak hour), 83% (PM peak hour), and 81% (Daily period). • Increase the WMC trips on the I-70 South Frontage Road by 11% (AM peak hour) and 230% (PM peak hour). The change in daily trips was not calculated, due to lack of data. The large decrease in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive is due to guest and patron parking spaces turning over more frequently than employee parking spaces. This is also the reason that the VVMC trips on the Frontage Road will increase. The following table provides more detail on the VVMC traffic volumes changes due to the proposed site changes. TABLE 1 - Change in VVMC Trips based on Parking Swap Based on traffic count data collected on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 (except as noted) Notes: vph - vehicles per hour; vpd - vehicles per day 1. 24 -hr traffic counts were not collected at the Main Entrance for the winter period; only peak period traffic counts were collected. The 1,325 vpd was estimated using the ratio between the peak hour traffic counts for winter and summer (winter is 35% higher), which was then applied to the 24 -hr count from August 2013 (982 vpd) to get 1,325 vpd. 2. Due to the configuration of the Employee Entrance on the Frontage Road it was not possible to conduct 24 -hr traffic counts using automated traffic recorders; only manual peak period traffic counts were obtained at this location. 3. Calculated the # of trips to/from the 97 employee parking spaces based on a ratio of 97 to 209 (46.4%); these employee trips will be relocated to Entrance with the "parking swap". 4. 275 vpd estimated based on the following assumptions: * None of the employees parking in the 97 spaces (day or night shift) leave VVMC during their shift; this assumption is based on extensive employe surveys conducted by TurnKey Consulting during the Vail MOB traffic study and VVMC staff experience * 97 parking spaces turn over once during the day shift (97 trips IN + 97 trips OUT = 194 trips) * 40 parking spaces turn over once during the night shift (40 trips IN + 40 trips OUT = 80 trips); based on all 40 night shift employees (all departme * Total daily trips to/from 97 employee spaces in West Parking Lot = 275 vpd (194 + 80 = 274, rounded up 275) Page 2 of 4 AM PM Daily Condition Access Parking Users Peak Hour Peak Hour Comment (vpd) (vph) (vphJ Main Entrance Guests & Patrons 64 147 1,3251,325 vpd estimated; see Note 1 below. (West Meadow Dr) [106 spaces] Existing Trips shown are only employee trips to/from the 209 Employee Entrance Employees 111 53 Note 2 employee parking spaces in the East parking structure; trips (Frontage Road) [209 spaces] Ito/from the US Bank Bldg are not included. Main Entrance Employee See Notes 3 & 4 below for assumptions on the trips to/from (West Meadow Dr) [97 spaces] 52 25 275 the 97 employee parking spaces. Guests & Patrons Proposed [106 spaces] Employee Entrance AND 123 175 Note 2 (Frontage Road) Employees [103 spaces] % Change Main Entrance --- -19% -83% -79% VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive will DECREASE (West Meadow Dr) (Existing to Employee Entrance Proposed) o 11 /0 0 230 /o Note 2 VVMC trips at the Frontage Road access will INCREASE (Frontage Road Notes: vph - vehicles per hour; vpd - vehicles per day 1. 24 -hr traffic counts were not collected at the Main Entrance for the winter period; only peak period traffic counts were collected. The 1,325 vpd was estimated using the ratio between the peak hour traffic counts for winter and summer (winter is 35% higher), which was then applied to the 24 -hr count from August 2013 (982 vpd) to get 1,325 vpd. 2. Due to the configuration of the Employee Entrance on the Frontage Road it was not possible to conduct 24 -hr traffic counts using automated traffic recorders; only manual peak period traffic counts were obtained at this location. 3. Calculated the # of trips to/from the 97 employee parking spaces based on a ratio of 97 to 209 (46.4%); these employee trips will be relocated to Entrance with the "parking swap". 4. 275 vpd estimated based on the following assumptions: * None of the employees parking in the 97 spaces (day or night shift) leave VVMC during their shift; this assumption is based on extensive employe surveys conducted by TurnKey Consulting during the Vail MOB traffic study and VVMC staff experience * 97 parking spaces turn over once during the day shift (97 trips IN + 97 trips OUT = 194 trips) * 40 parking spaces turn over once during the night shift (40 trips IN + 40 trips OUT = 80 trips); based on all 40 night shift employees (all departme * Total daily trips to/from 97 employee spaces in West Parking Lot = 275 vpd (194 + 80 = 274, rounded up 275) Page 2 of 4 West Wing Traffic Mitigation Due to the reduction of traffic on West Meadow Drive, there will not be a need for any roadway improvements at the VVMC access to West Meadow Drive, or the intersection at Vail Road. The proposed site changes will not significantly change the amount of VVMC trips traveling through the Main Vail Interchange roundabouts. The travel patterns will change in a symmetrical manner and this will not affect roundabout operations. Therefore, no changes will not be required at this intersection as part of West Wing construction. Frontage Road Mitigation Turn Key Consulting completed the traffic analysis necessary to identify the type and timing of the Interim Improvements on the Frontage Road in 2015. The following concept sketch for Interim Improvements was developed in coordination with TOV, because their municipal site access would be relocated slightly to the west of its current location. This improvement would create a 4 -leg intersection on the Frontage Road, which eliminates the current overlap of inbound left turns between the VVMC (south side) and TOV (north side) access points. EXIST. R/W 11 Ir BEGRE IW --7 A HOO REMOVEPOWTMN OF, _ • PRi TO DRAIN ,\ TOE OF F01 (TYP.) �.. ' ADJUST S.W. MANHOLE \\\ �, • ^ .. ; Ap11MCIPAI CENTER PARK]NG LOT * ,. \� ADVERSE CROSS SLOPE / • i THROUGH INTERSECTION/ POTENTUL REL[)CA •. RI9AN L (SAN LOW -SPEED AHI,5 ,1 • RTE / \ ` AF IX - EXTENTS \\`` L • _ OF REGRADING A ULL CROSS PANLoc LANE TION PROFILE A EXIST. l \ DRIVEWAY SLOPE 14.61 RI/RO'y w TOE OF FILL FULL WIDE ACCESS RE FACILITATE PARKING GARAGE VVMC PARKING GARAGE RO EB LANEPROFILE LOCA • .MFIL` '"n CSS Page 3 of 4 ENO PROFILEPE LANE STA. SIRUCTI WB STA I460 D • MLINI IPAL "-~_.` TrJ''FAELaAq FOR � 4 i Z The VVMC Frontage Road Access was analyzed using two different sets of South Frontage Road through -traffic volumes in order to evaluate the summer 2015 condition and the winter 2016/2016 condition. The traffic volumes IN and OUT of the VVMC access and TOV access are the same in each scenario; only the eastbound and westbound thru traffic on the South Frontage Road are different. • Scenario #1 - Summer Conditions (2013 Summer Counts forecasted to Year 2015) • Scenario #2 — Peak Winter Conditions (Year 2006 Holiday Counts forecasted to Year 2015) The traffic analysis showed the following results. • Scenario #1 —Summer Conditions The existing access configuration on the Frontage Road would provide acceptable traffic operations (delay and queuing) for the Scenario #1 traffic volumes. The Frontage Road thru volumes would be 71% (AM peak Hour) and 63% (PM peak hour) lower in Scenario #1 than Scenario #2. The lower Frontage Road traffic volumes is the reason the existing access configuration would provide acceptable traffic operations for the Scenario #1 traffic volumes. There would not be more gaps in the through traffic opposing the left turn traffic. Therefore, the Interim Improvements are not needed if the parking swap was implemented in the summer of 2015. It may be necessary to use temporary flagger traffic control during occasional holidays or other higher -than -normal traffic conditions. • Scenario #2 — Peak Winter Conditions The existing access configuration on the Frontage Road would not provide acceptable traffic operations for the Scenario #2 traffic volumes. Therefore, the Interim Improvements would need to be constructed prior to winter season in 2015. The high volume of thru traffic on the South Frontage Road means that there are fewer gaps for in through traffic opposing vehicles turning in and out of the VVMC and TOV accesses. In addition, there are other factors that contribute to the poor traffic operations in the winter condition. First, the VVMC and Municipal Site accesses are off -set by approximately 90 -feet, which creates conflicts between inbound left turn movements at both the VVMC and TOV access points. These movements overlap and compete for the same section of center turn lane on the Frontage Road. Second, with the parking swap, the left -turn volume into the VVMC Access would increase from 26 vehicles per hour (vph) to 70 vph. The additional inbound VVMC left -turns increase the chance of conflicts between inbound VVMC and TOV left -turns in the median turn -lane. Third, the increase in inbound VVMC left -turns (26 vph to 70 vph) would create westbound left -turn queues that extend back into the westbound thru lane and block thru traffic. Fourth, the increase in inbound VVMC left -turns would also cause the outbound VVMC and TOV left -turns to experience long delays (2-3 minutes or longer). This will occur because a majority of the gaps in the eastbound thru traffic would be used by the additional VVMC inbound left -turns. The Frontage Road will operate safely and efficiently during the typical (non -holiday) winter conditions upon completion of the interim improvements. It may be necessary to use temporary flagger traffic control during occasional holidays or other higher -than -normal traffic conditions. Page 4 of 4 Traffic Impact Study Prepared For: Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan I-70 South Frontage Road, just west of the main Vail interchange Vail, Colorado September 30, 2014 2533 West Pinyon Ave ^ rCnKe Grand Junction, CO 81505 rn n 970-985-4001 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................................................................... 1 LISTOF FIGURES................................................................................................................. 2 LISTOF TABLES................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 STUDY AREA.............................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PERIODS AND YEARS...................................................................................................................4 1.4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ASSUMPTIONS RELATED TO ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT.......................................................4 1.5 EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROJECT USES...................................................................................................................4 1.6 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS............................................................................................................... 8 1.7 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................... 11 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA.............................................................................. 13 2.1 VVMC ACCESSES.................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 OTHER TRAFFIC COUNT LOCATIONS........................................................................................................................ 13 2.3 PEAK HOUR DETERMINATION: VVMC TRAFFIC VS FRONTAGE ROAD TRAFFIC....................................................... 15 2.4 VVMC WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VS WEEKEND PEAK HOUR...................................................................................... 16 3 PROJECT TRIPS.......................................................................................................... 16 3.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION..................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION...................................................................................................................................18 4 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES........................................................... 26 4.1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES...........................................................................................................................26 4.2 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (BACKGROUND + PROJECT)...........................................................................................29 5 TURN LANE WARRANTS AT VVMC ACCESS TO FRONTAGE ROAD ...................... 35 6 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS............................................................................. 35 6.1 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION #1]........................................................................35 6.2 VVMC ACCESS/ TOV ACCESS ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION#2]...............................................................38 6.3 VAIL ROAD AND MEADOW DRIVE [INTERSECTION#3].............................................................................................40 7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................ 42 7.1 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION #1] ........................................................................42 7.2 VVMC ACCESS/ TOV ACCESS ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION#2]...............................................................43 7.3 VAIL ROAD AND MEADOW DRIVE [INTERSECTION#3].............................................................................................43 APPENDIX ,�TurnKe�y Page 1 "�— Com nsultin LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS List of Figures Figure1 —Vicinity Map........................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2 — Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Control.......................................................... 7 Figure 3 — Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Count Volumes ...................................................... 14 Figure 4 — Project Trip Distribution (AM Peak Hour)............................................................. 19 Figure 5 — Project Trip Distribution (PM Peak Hour)............................................................. 20 Figure 6 — Project Trip Assignment (West End — During Construction) ................................ 21 Figure 7 — Project Trip Assignment (West End — Construction Completed) .......................... 22 Figure 8 — Project Trip Assignment (East End — During Construction) ................................. 23 Figure 9 — Project Trip Assignment (East End — Construction Completed) ........................... 24 Figure 10 — Project Trip Assignment (Build-out)................................................................... 25 Figure 11 — Adjusted Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................ 27 Figure 12 — Year 2015 Total Traffic Volumes (West End — During Construction) ................. 30 Figure 13 — Year 2016 Total Traffic Volumes (West End — Construction Completed) .......... 31 Figure 14 — Year 2017 Total Traffic Volumes (East End — During Construction) .................. 32 Figure 15 — Year 2018 Total Traffic Volumes (East End — Construction Completed) ........... 33 Figure 16 — Year 2035 Total Traffic Volumes (Build -out) ...................................................... 34 List of Tables Table 1 — Existing and Proposed Project Uses....................................................................... 5 Table 2 — Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces.................................................................. 5 Table 3 — Proposed Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] ............................................. 9 Table 4 — VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] ....................................... 9 Table 5 — VVMC/TOV Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] .................. 10 Table 6 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] ................................. 10 Table 7 — Summary of Traffic Counts at VVMC Accesses .................................................... 13 Table 8 — Peak Hour Comparison......................................................................................... 15 Table 9 — Year 2014 Winter Traffic Count at VVMC Accesses by Group ............................. 16 Table 10 — VVMC Trip Generation Summary ....................................................................... 18 Table 11 — VVMC Trip Distribution Summary ....................................................................... 18 Table 12 — Compare Frontage Road Traffic Volumes.......................................................... 26 Table 13 — Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Rd ....................................... 35 Table 14 — Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018].......................................................... 37 Table 15 — Roundabout Analysis: Compare Various Methodologies .................................... 37 Table 16 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2014] ......................... 38 Table 17 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2018] ......................... 39 Table 18 — VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] ................................... 40 Table 19 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] ......................... 40 Table 20 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2014] ............................... 41 Table 21 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] ............................... 42 TI.11'17�{�Y Page 2 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction This report documents the traffic impact study (TIS) for the proposed Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan (Project) in the Town of Vail (TOV), Colorado. The VVMC is located on the south side of the 1-70 South Frontage Road (Frontage Road) about 750 feet west of the main Vail interchange. The VVMC also has access to West Meadow Drive. See Figure 1 for the Project Vicinity Map. All land use details listed in this TIS are based on the VVMC Master Plan effort, and will be updated as the Project concept is refined. Another key assumption is a future roundabout on the Frontage Road, which would provide optimal access to each of the three adjacent properties when this area builds out. The TOV has recently been working with adjacent property owners to evaluate alternative roundabout locations and to define the preferred location for this roundabout. This TIS assumed a roundabout configuration, but the roundabout solution is dependent upon the participation of all three property owners, and is based on the assumption that each of the properties will be redeveloped at the same time. Since the timing of these projects may not occur simultaneously, VVMC evaluated Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated access options that do not include a roundabout. This TIS will be updated as necessary and resubmitted for the TOV Condition Use Permit (CUP) and Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) access permit processes. 1.2 Study Area The Study Area includes the intersections listed below, which are shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the lane geometry and traffic control. Intersections #1 Frontage Road and Evergreen Access (South Leg) (Proposed Roundabout west of VVMC Access) #2 Frontage Road and VVMC Access (South Leg) / TOV Access (North Leg) #3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive �Y Page 3 cow �I.11'17�{nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS The Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection was added to the Study Area because the VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction. The increase in VVMC trips at this intersection will occur because the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. The south roundabout at the Main Vail Interchange was not included in the Study Area. The 2025 Vail Transportation Plan (Vail TMP) concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at this interchange, and discussed other system -wide improvements that would help alleviate congestion at the Main Vail Interchange. 1.3 Traffic Analysis Periods and Years The traffic analysis was conducted for the periods and conditions listed below. The traffic volumes used in the analysis are based on traffic data from the peak summer and winter seasons. In addition, traffic volumes from the Vail TMP were used for the Frontage Road. Periods • Weekday AM Peak Hour • Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions • Year 2015 — West End (During Construction) • Year 2016 — West End (Construction Completed) • Year 2017 — East End (During Construction) • Year 2018 — East End (Construction Completed) • Year 2035 — Build -out (20 -year horizon) Definitions: West End improvements include approximately 40,000 SF of medical space on and around the existing West Wing of the VVMC. East End improvements include approximately 25,000 SF of net new medical space and an expanded parking structure at the east end of the Campus. 1.4 Background Traffic Assumptions Related to Adjacent Development The future traffic volumes used in this study assume the following: • VVMC build out • Evergreen Site redevelopment, per previous traffic study for this site • No changes to the TOV municipal site 1.5 Existing and Proposed Project Uses Table 1 shows the existing and proposed Project uses for each condition. Table 2 shows the number of employee and guest/patron parking spaces for each condition. (--,TumKe]/ Page 4 Cons utting, L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 1- Existing and Proposed Project Uses Condition Year Gross Bldg Full-time Employees Patient Exam Rooms Condition Year Area (SF) (FTE) Beds Frontage Road Existing 2014 202,000 569 58 155 West End 2015 202,000 569 58 160 (During Const) West End 2016 242,000 590 58 190 (Const Completed) 107 116 245 46 291 East End 2017 242,000 590 58 190 (During Const 66 195 96 291 204 East End 2018 268,000 610 58 197 (Const Completed) Build -out Prior to 300,000 1 700 58 2601 245 2035 291 254 153 407 Const Com leted Overall Increase 49% 23% 0% 68% (Existing to Build -out) 2017 32' 153' 185' Notes: SF — square footage 1. The SF and exam rooms shown for the Build -out Condition are speculative in nature. Estimates are provided for long-range traffic planning purposes only Table 2 - Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces Note: the number of parking spaces were estimated based on schematic designs for the Master Plan effort; the final parking numbers are subject to change as more detailed design work is completed. # Parking Spaces Accessed via Total Condition Year # Parking Spaces West Meadow Drive Frontage Road Emp P / G Total Emp P / G I Total Emp I P / G Total Existing 2014 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 West End 2015 9 57 66 195 96 291 204 153 357 (During Const West End 2016 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 Const Com leted East End 2017 32' 153' 185' 02 0 0 32 153 185 (During Const) 2018 53 0 5 404 210 614 409 210 619 (CoEsat Compnedted) Build -out Prior to 5 3 0 5 435 260 695 440 260 700 2035 Overall Increase 73% 70% 72% (Existing to Build -out Notes: Emp — Employee, P / G — Patron / Guest 1. Includes 69 parking spaces (46 = P / G, 23 = Emp) at the US Bank Building that will be accessed from West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. 2. During the East End Construction the VVMC will "replace" 245 parking spaces by leasing parking spaces at nearby parking structures, and/or increasing transit and shuttle use by employees. 3. These 5 parking spaces are for service vehicles Turn�{eY Page 5 Com nsumng, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Proposed Roundabout [Int #1] (General location bas( �� n o on FHU study area) Existing 1-70 South South WMCFrontage Rd Roundabout Accessat Main Vail [Int #2] Interchange 44— Existing VVMC Main Access (to be relocated to Int #2) W Meadow Dr �' Vail Road and Meadow Dr r►nt #31 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Vicinity Map 1 w �LIr17a{{�Y Page 6 consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1 2 Not To Scale Exact location and �+}► geometry of the T Proposed Roundabout not know at this point; ~ yellow shape represents the area studied by FHU 0 1, J0.O TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 I." 800M F rootage Rd vvMc 3 ►ti,yead - ow T E Meadow Drive M 3 Ped / TronsR only �1 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Control 2 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 7 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1.6 Summary of Traffic Analysis Results The following sections summarize the traffic analysis results at the three Study Area intersections. 1.6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions of all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the completion of of the VVMC Master Plan, which is anticipated to be year 2018. Table 3 shows the level of service (LOS), delay, and queuing results of the roundabout analysis based on the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology. Turn�{eY Page 8 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 3 - Proposed Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] Roundabout AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue Approach LOS — Delay95th T sec ft sec ft (ft) (sec) (ft) West Leg A-5 20 A-9 70 (Frontage Road) C — 16 30 C — 19 50 East Leg A-6 50 A-6 50 (Frontage Road) Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 South Leg A-6 20 A-9 20 (Evergreen Lodge Access) Westbound North Leg A-6 20 A-6 20 TOV Service Access A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access Overall Roundabout A - 6 50 (max) A - 7 70 (max) (all vehicles) Table 3 shows that the Proposed Roundabout will operate at LOS A with minimal queuing in year 2018, the anticipated opening year of the WMC Master Plan. Refer to the FHU memo in the Appendix for the year 2035 Build -out analysis results. 1.6.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. Table 4 shows that the "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access and TOV Access thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. Table 4 - VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] VVMC Access is RIRO. TOV Access is % (Left -turn IN arohibited) Turn�{eY Page 9 O_fcow nsulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay95th T % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Southbound Shared Left- C — 16 30 C — 19 50 (TOVAccess) and Right -Turn Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 A — 10 105 (VVMC Access) Westbound (Evergreen Lodge U-turn A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access Turn�{eY Page 9 O_fcow nsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 5 shows that the RIRO configuration at the VVMC and TOV Accesses on the Frontage Road will operate at LOS A in the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. Table 5 - VVMC/TOV Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TO Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Proaosed Roundabout) 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue ft sec (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Northbound Right -turn A-3 45 A-8 95 (VVMC Access) (West Meadow Drive) Southbound Right -turn A-4 35 A-5 50 (TOV Access) Northbound A-8 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 10 O—fcow nsultin , LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue sec ft sec ft Eastbound A-7 50 B — 10 95 (West Meadow Drive) Westbound A — 10 55 A-9 65 (East Meadow Drive) Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 90 (Vail Road) Southbound A — 10 115 B — 11 100 (Vail Road) Overall Intersection A-9 115 (max) B — 11 100 (max) (all vehicles) T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 10 O—fcow nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 6 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End Construction). However, the traffic data obtained in February 2014 showed that the peak hour trips to/from the US Bank Building were 36 vph (AM) and 43 (PM). Based on the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection (AM = 316 vph, PM = 518 vph), the increase in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive to/from the US Bank Building during the East End Constructions is only 11% (AM) and 8% (PM). VVMC Trips on West Meadow Drive after the VVMC Master Plan is Completed After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000-1,400 vehicles per day (1,000 = summer season, 1,400 = winter season) to 58 vehicles per day (service and delivery vehicles only). The 58 vehicles per day on West Meadow Drive is 29 services and delivery vehicles that make 29 trips IN and 29 trips OUT for a total of 58 daily trips. The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. 1.7 Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 1.7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the Turn�{eY Page 11 O-fcow nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. 1.7.2 VVMC Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. The "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access (RIRO) and TOV Access (3/4 movement) thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. 1.7.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction due to the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building being accesses via West Meadow Drive. However, the increase in traffic at this intersection will only be 11% (AM) and 8% (PM), and there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at this intersection. No changes are recommended at this intersection. Turn�{eY Page 12 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 2 Existing Traffic Count Data 2.1 VVMC Accesses Traffic counts were conducted at the VVMC Accesses on the dates and times listed in Table 7. Table 7 also shows a comparison of the summer and winter traffic counts. Table 7 — Summary of Traffic Counts at VVMC Accesses Season Date AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Time Traffic Volumes (vph) Time Traffic Volumes (vph) IN OUT Total IN OUT Total Summer' Wednesday, August 21, 2013 Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:30-7:30 am 160 29 189 4:00-5:00 pm 62 94 156 Winter Tuesday, February 4, 2014 6:45-7:45 am 167 36 203 3:30-4:30 pm 108 109 217 % Difference (Summer is % lower than Winter) 7% 28% Notes: vph — vehicles per hour 1. The peak hour data shown is for highest peak hours of the two days that were counted Table 7 shows that the winter season peak hour traffic volumes were higher than the summer season. Therefore, the traffic data collected on February 4, 2014 was used for this TIS. 2.2 Other Traffic Count Locations In addition to counting the traffic IN and OUT at the VVMC Accesses, the movements and intersection listed below were also counted. Figure 3 shows the existing year 2014 peak hour traffic volumes at these locations. The Appendix contains the peak hour traffic count data at all locations. • Frontage Road thru movements at the VVMC Access • Traffic IN and OUT at the TOV Access • Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 13 Com nsuivng, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS ii Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Evergreen Lodge Access \O ` 1 TOV West Access VVMC 20 ` 76 i , `► 44 71 11 18 16 15 This intersection was counted to determine the overall trips to/from VVMC, but was not included in the intersection analysis. 0 TOV Main Access 2 I-70 $00 F rootage Rd � fead /�2�8Oly 3 3 0 L 4 0 12Lj L_ 4 7 10 10 0 18 9 01Ir0 2 4 60 2 151 2 3 5\ 2 5j I 13 39 193 2� i � 5 359 11� 84 9 318 26 2 29/ Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Count Volumes Main Vail 0 265 274 E Meadow Drive 3 Ped /Transit Only Figure 3 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 14 Com nsultinr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 2.3 Peak Hour Determination: VVMC Traffic vs Frontage Road Traffic The AM and PM peak hours for the VVMC traffic and the Frontage Road thru traffic were calculated separately to see if had the same peak hour. Table 8 shows a comparison of the peak hours. The Appendix contains more detailed peak hour calculations. Table 8 — Peak Hour Comparison Time Peak Period Traffic Volumes vehicles per hour (vph) VVMC Traffic 1-70 South Frontage Road All Accesses At VVMC Access IN OUT Total WB Thru EB Thru Total AM Peak Period 6:30-730 am 149 28 177 1 117 136 72 79 189 215 7:00-8:00 am 154 36 190 180 110 290 7:15-8:15 am 7:30-8:30 am140 150 42 192 42 182265 235 151 193 386 458 PM Peak Period 3:00-4:00 pm 98 84 182 249 315 564 3:15-4:15 pm 1 14pm 102 97 199 270 278 340 350 610 628 3:45-4: 94 86 115 209 121 207 278 351 629 4:15-5: 79 123 202 279 341 620 4:30-5:30 pm 65 127 192 267 320 587 4:45-5:45 pm 63 143 206 246 294 540 5:00-6.00 pm 66 143 209 223 272 495 Table 8 shows that the peak hours for the VVMC traffic and Frontage Road traffic are different. Below are observations about each peak period. AM Peak Hour The VVMC and Frontage Road peak hours only overlap by 15 minutes. VVMC traffic during the Frontage Road peak hour is 10% lower than during the VVMC peak hour (203 vph vs 182 vph). Frontage Road traffic during the VVMC peak hour is 53% lower than during the Frontage Road peak hour (458 vph vs 215 vph). Because the Frontage Road traffic is so much lower during the VVMC peak hour (458 vph vs 215 vph), the traffic volumes during the Frontage Road peak hour were used for the AM peak hour. �, Tq 1 Key Page 15 J -- -�I "�— cow nsult n , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS PM Peak Hour The VVMC and Frontage Road peak hours overlap by 30 minutes. VVMC traffic during the Frontage Road peak hour is 5% lower than during the VVMC peak hour (217 vph vs 207 vph). Frontage Road traffic during the VVMC peak hour is 0.8% lower than during the Frontage Road peak hour (633 vph vs 628 vph). Because the Frontage Road peak hour is essentially the same during the VVMC peak hour (633 vph vs 628 vph), the traffic volumes during the VVMC peak hour were used for the PM peak hour. 2.4 VVMC Weekday Peak Hour vs Weekend Peak Hour The traffic volumes discussed in Sections 2.1-2.3 were collected during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The weekday represents the peak for the VVMC because the VVMC operates at full capacity with all clinics open on weekdays. On the weekend, the VVMC has significantly less trips because the clinics are closed and VVMC operates with reduced and staff and doctors. 3 Project Trips 3.1 Project Trip Generation The Project trip generation is based on the existing winter season traffic counts at the VVMC Accesses and the existing and future VVMC land use and parking spaces. Table 9 summarizes the existing traffic counts at the VVMC Accesses by group — employees and guests / patrons. Table 9 — Year 2014 Winter Traffic Count at WMC Accesses by Group Peak Hour Main Access (W Meadow Dr) Service Access (W Meadow Dr) Employee Access (Frontage Road) US Bank Bldg Access (Frontage Road Total IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT Guest/ Patron Trips AM 44 20 --- --- --- --- 5 0 49 20 PM 71 76 --- --- --- --- 5 2 76 78 Employee Trips AM --- --- 1 1 61 19 29 2 91 22 PM --- --- 2 2 5 18 25 11 32 31 The steps listed below were used to calculate the VVMC trip generation for each condition. The trip generation for Guests / Patrons and Employees were calculated separately, and then combined at the last step. The Appendix contains the detailed trip generation calculations. Guest / Patron Trip Generation Calculations Step #1 Calculated the percent change in Patient Beds, Exam Rooms, and Guest / Patron Parking Spaces from one condition to the next. �rTumKeY,, Page 16 \'- __-,"Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS The Patient Beds did not change for any condition so it was disregarded. Due to the limited Parking Spaces at the VVMC, the trip generation is more dependent upon the availability of Parking Spaces than the increase in Exam Rooms. Therefore, the percent change in trip generation for each condition was directly correlated to the percent change in Guest / Patron Parking Spaces. Step #2 Increased the trips to/from the VVMC by the percent change in Parking Spaces from Step #1. Step #3 Allocated the trips to/from the VVMC for each condition based on the percent of parking spaces accessed via West Meadows Drive or Frontage Road. Employee Trip Generation Calculations Step #1 Calculated the percent change in FTE's and Employee Parking Spaces from one condition to the next. Due to the limited Employee Parking Spaces at the VVMC (some employees have to park off-site now), the Employee trip generation is dependent upon the availability of Employee Parking Spaces, and not the increase in FTE's. Therefore, the percent change in trip generation for each condition was directly correlated to the percent change in Employee Parking Spaces. Step #2 Increased/decreased the trips to/from the VVMC by the percent change in Parking Spaces from Step #1. Step #3 Allocated the trips to/from the VVMC for each condition based on the percent of parking spaces accessed via West Meadows Drive or Frontage Road Combine Guest / Patron and Employee Trips Step #4 The number of Patron / Guest and Employee trips were combined to get the total trips to/from the VVMC on West Meadow Drive, and Frontage Road for each condition. Table 10 shows a summary of the VVMC trip generation. The "Trip Generation Calculations" table in the Appendix shows the detailed trip generation calculations. �I.11'17�{�Y Page 17 cow nsultinr ,-L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 10 - VVMC Trip Generation Summary 3.2 Project Trip Distribution The Project Trip Distribution was based on the existing traffic counts at 1) the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road, and 2) Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection. Table 11 shows the trip distribution percentages at these two locations. The Project Trip Distribution is the same in all conditions. Table 11- WMC Trip Distribution Summary Trip Distribution for VVMC Trips VVMC Peak Hour Trips (vph) West Meadow DriveFrontage West Meadow Drive Road Condition Year AM Pk Hr PM Pk HrEAMPk Hr PM Pk Hr To the East I (NB RT) To the West (NB LT) From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) IN Out Tot IN Out Totut 15% 100% I Tot IN Out Tot Existing 2014 45 21 66 73 78 151 95 21 116 35 31 66 West End 2015 21 8 29 29 30 59 101 30 131 73 73 146 (During Const) West End 2016 37 15 52 54 56 110 103 27 130 54 53 107 (Const Completed) East End 2017 60 23 83 80 82 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 (During Const) East End 2018 2 0 2 1 1 2 212 62 274 155 156 311 (Const Completed) Build -out Prior to 2 0 2 1 1 2 239 72 311 183 186 369 2035 3.2 Project Trip Distribution The Project Trip Distribution was based on the existing traffic counts at 1) the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road, and 2) Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection. Table 11 shows the trip distribution percentages at these two locations. The Project Trip Distribution is the same in all conditions. Table 11- WMC Trip Distribution Summary Figures 4 (AM Peak) and 5 (PM Peak Hour) show the Project Trip Distribution. Figures 6 thru 10 show the Project Trip Assignment. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 18 Com nsulting, LLC Trip Distribution for VVMC Trips Frontage Road West Meadow Drive Peak Hour Inbound Tris Outbound Tris Inbound Tris Outbound Trips From the East (WB LT) From the West (EB RT) To the East I (NB RT) To the West (NB LT) From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) To the South (EB RT) AM 90% 10% 85% 15% 100% 0% 90% 10% PM 75% 25% 95% 5% 95% 5% 95% 5% Figures 4 (AM Peak) and 5 (PM Peak Hour) show the Project Trip Distribution. Figures 6 thru 10 show the Project Trip Assignment. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 18 Com nsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS X = Inbound Traffic % Y = Outbound Traffic % Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Distribution - AM Peak Hour (Same for all Conditions) I 4 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 19 cow nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS X = Inbound Traffic % Y = Outbound Traffic % 0% 5% Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Distribution - PM Peak Hour (Same for all Conditions) I 5 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 20 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (West End - During Construction) I 6 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 21 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (West End - Construction Completed) I 7 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 22 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (East End - During Construction) I 8 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 23 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (East End - Construction Completed) I 9 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 24 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (Build -out) I 10 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 25 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 4 Existing and Future Traffic Volumes The following sections describe the existing, future background, and total traffic volumes. The Appendix contains tables that show the traffic volumes at the Study Area intersections. 4.1 Background Traffic Volumes 4.1.1 Frontage Road Traffic Volumes 4.1.1.1 Existing Year 2014 The existing year 2014 Frontage Road traffic volumes are based on the traffic counts conducted in February 2014. The Frontage Road traffic volumes from the February 2014 traffic count were compared to the traffic volumes from 1) the 2009 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Vail TMP), 2) the Vail MOB TIS prepared in November 2012 by Turn Key Consulting, and 3) the MOB and Municipal Center Roundabout Analysis memo prepared in October 2012 by FHU. Table 12 shows the traffic volume comparison. Table 12 — Compare Frontage Road Traffic Volumes Peak Year 2006 Year 2014 Year 2014 Year 2025 Year 2032 Hour Direction (Vail TMP) (Calculated) (traffic count (Vail TMP) (TOV Info) (Note 1) in Feb 2014) EB 395 475 193 605 AM Not included in WB 585 704 265 880 Vail TMP Total 980 1,178 458 1,485 EB 815 980 359 1,202 1,160 PM WB 600 722 274 992 985 Total 1,415 1,701 633 2,194 2,145 Notes: 1. The year 2014 Frontage Road traffic volumes were calculated using a straight-line growth between the years 2006 and 2025 traffic volumes in the Vail TMP. The annual growth rate (AGR) between years 2006 and 2025 traffic volumes in the Vail TMP was 2.34% per year. Table 12 shows that the year 2014 traffic counts are 62% lower than the year 2014 traffic volumes calculated using the years 2006 and 2035 traffic volumes from the Vail TMP. In addition, the 2014 traffic counts are 54% lower than the year 2006 traffic volumes from the Vail TMP. Because of the significant difference between traffic volume sources, the Frontage Road traffic volumes based on the Vail TMP were used so that this TIS is consistent with the Vail TMP. The traffic volumes in the Vail TMP are based on traffic data "collected over a variety of times including the Christmas holiday, Martin Luther King weekend, Presidents Day weekend, and Spring Break times in 2005 and 2006." (Page 4 of the Vail TMP). Figure 11 shows the adjusted year 2014 traffic volumes. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 26 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Evergreen Lodge Access /i,1 1 3 5 1 2 5 13 ��� 2 1 39 423 2 662 475 2� 5 704 920 ~ 652 980 ~ 722 \25 � 47 11� 84 � I 75 9 I 26 16 I 64 3 I 18 4 69 2 29 1 \TOV West Access VVMC 3 143 �65 1030 28 88� 1 4 0 12 LI t 4 7 10 10 3--1 0 18 9 0� 0 2 4 60 2 151 '� d `ft TOV Main Access 2 1 1-70 South F rontags Rd W Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive I 3 pad / Tren8lt Only Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Adjusted Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 11 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 27 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 4.1.1.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018 The 2.34% AGR (refer to Note 1 of Table 12) was applied to the year 2014 traffic volumes from the Vail MOB TIS to calculate the Frontage Road traffic volumes in years 2015-2018 and 2035. 4.1.1.3 Future Year 2035 FHU, who prepared the Vail TMP, stated in an email to the TOV that a 0.5% AGR could be used to forecast traffic growth from year 2025 to year 2034. The 0.5% AGR was applied to the year 2025 Frontage Road traffic volumes in the Vail TMP to estimate year 2035 Frontage Road traffic volumes. The Appendix contains the email from FHU to the TOV. The 0.5% AGR from 2025 to 2034 has been recommended by FHU and the TOV since the Vail TMP is based on the assumption that Vail will reach build -out by 2025. It has been recommended that after build -out only this modest growth rate be applied. It also should be noted that with the recent economic downturn and slowing of development in Vail, it is unlikely Vail will see build out in 2025 and potentially it will extend beyond 2034. Thus it is likely that the total traffic growth projected for this study is very conservative. 4.1.2 TOV Traffic Volumes (Main Access) 4.1.2.1 Existing Year 2014 The traffic volumes to/from the main access to TOV Municipal Building (TOV Main Access) on the Frontage Road were counted during the February 2014 traffic counts. These traffic volumes were used without any modifications. 4.1.2.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The year 2014 traffic volumes to/from the TOV were assumed to stay the same in all future year scenarios. There have been several proposed projects on the north side of the Frontage Road (including a parking structure for the VVMC) that would significantly increase the traffic volume at the TOV Access. At this point the traffic volumes at the TOV Access do not include any future development on the TOV property. 4.1.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive Traffic Volumes 4.1.3.1 Existing Year 2014 The traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection were counted during the February 2014 traffic counts. This intersection was not included in the Vail TMP so it was not possible to see how the February 2014 traffic counts compared to the Holiday traffic counts in the Vail TMP. Therefore, these traffic volumes were used without any modifications for year 2014. �Y Page 28 Com �I.11'17�{nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 4.1.3.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The background traffic volumes (all movements except those to/from West Meadow Drive) at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection were increase by 0.5% AGR to years 2015 thru 2018 and 2035. The 0.5% AGR is based on the area served by this intersection is already developed, but traffic will still probably see modest growth over time as noted by FHU in the email to the TOV referenced in Section 4.1.1.3. 4.1.4 Evergreen Lodge Traffic Volumes 4.1.4.1 Existing Year 2014 The Evergreen Lodge is located on the south side of the Frontage Road immediately west of the VVMC. If the Proposed Roundabout is constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC / TOV Access, the south leg of the Proposed Roundabout could be the Evergreen Lodge access. Because of this, the traffic volumes to/from the Evergreen Lodge were estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Fox Higgins prepared a traffic study in year 2008 for the proposed redevelopment of the Evergreen Lodge. The Fox Higgins traffic study was based on the Evergreen Lodge expanding from 128 units (128 hotel rooms) to 230 units (139 hotel rooms and 91 condos). Even though the redevelopment has not occurred yet, the year 2014 traffic volumes at the Evergreen Lodge were based on the proposed redevelopment from the Fox Higgins traffic study. The trips to/from the Evergreen Lodge were distributed using the same trip distribution percentages calculated at the VVMC Frontage Road access. The Appendix contains select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study, and the Evergreen Lodge trip generation and distribution calculations. 4.1.4.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The year 2014 traffic volumes to/from the Evergreen Lodge were assumed to stay the same in all future year scenarios. 4.2 Total Traffic Volumes (Background + Project) Total traffic volumes are the sum of project traffic and background traffic. The Appendix contains tables that show the total traffic volumes at the Study Area intersections. Figures 12 thru 16 show the total traffic volumes. �I.11'17�{�Y Page 29 Com nsultinr ,-L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 2 433 1� 680 952 671 25 1 I I 75 16 I 64 4 69 1 TOV West ,�< Access Evergreen Lodge TOV Main Access Access 2 f VVMC 3 7144 /41 104 0 16 47�4 0 78� 4 7 10 10 2� � 0 18 7 0� 1 I 0 2 1 60 2 152 '\ ft 0 See Note Below 3 5� 2 5j I 13,' 39 2 5 486 � 720 1003739 \1 0� 91 18 55, 5 26 4 69 South Fronts _ go Rd W NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive I 3 a.d / Translt only Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Year 2015 Total Traffic Volumes (West End - During Construction) 12 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 30 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 2 444 1� 696 971 687 12� 47 \25 � 75 16 I 64 4 69 3 144 /57 104 0 23 70�4 0 102 4 7 10 10 0 18 8 00 2 3 61 2 153 '� ft 0 South Fronts _ 9e Rd W 2 See Note Below 3 5 2 5� '13,,'39 2 5 497 � 737 1026 756 10� 14 4� 3 I 50 NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive I 3 pad / TrenSlt Only Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Year 2016 Total Traffic Volumes (West End - Construction Completed) 13 �I.11'17rf{�Y Page 31 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 1 1� 2 \�, 446 709 981702 12� � 47 \�25 I 75 16 I 64 4 69 —N\jSee Note Below 3 5 5� �1339 509 2� 5 754 1050 774 VVMC Access �I.11'17�{�Y Page 32 Com nsul nr , LLC TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 1'70 South Fronto 9e Rd vvMc 0 3 h�,yeaa _ 145 80 105 0 �/�ve ' 1 30 0 8 95� � � 4 4 Meadow Drive E L 7 10 1018 NOTE 3 Ped /Tronslt only 3e� 2 This movement will have to make a U- � turn at the Proposed Roundabout west 0 0 of the VVMC Access when the TOV 4 61 2 153 Access is converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure 14 Year 2017 Total Traffic Volumes (East End - During Construction) �I.11'17�{�Y Page 32 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 479 1� 2 736 1045 728 12� 47 25 16� I 75 I 64 4 69 1 TOV West Access Evergreen Lodge TOV Main Access Access 2 I VVMC '� ft 0 2 See Note Below 3 5 2 5 ���5 X13; 521 772 1075 792 21� �191� 39 9� 153 X116; 8 I 148 South Fronta _ 9a Rd W NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Main Vail Interchana 0 11 E Meadow Drive I 3 ved / Traly nsit On Year 2018 Total Traffic Volumes (East End - Construction Completed) Figure 15 �I.11'17rf{�Y Page 33 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 606 1� 2 920 1263 985 1 "' 47 25 � I 75 16 I 64 4 69 3 159 24 114\4� 22 10 55�—t 4 11 0 20 6 �Tro 67 2 168 '� ft 0 South Fronts _ 9e Rd W See Note �,\A Below 4 7` 10� 22, 3 54 25� 60 644 953 1263 1043 \24� 215; 46 ',137, 11 61 9 177 NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Year 2035 Total Traffic Volumes (Build -out) Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive 3 vd / Trenslt Only Figure 16 �I.11'17rf{�Y Page 34 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 5 Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Road The need for turn lanes on the Frontage Road at the VVMC Access is based on the requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC). Table 13 shows the required turn lanes per the SHAC. Table 13 — Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Rd Table 13 shows that an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane (EB RT Decel Lane) will be required at the VVMC Access to the Frontage Road. The EB RT Decel Lane was included in the roadway configuration for the traffic analysis discussed in the next section. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations was analyzed at the three Study Area intersections. The following sections describe the analysis and results for each Study Area intersection. 6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC Access was analyzed using the FHWA Roundabout Methodology, which utilizes the methods and calculations in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). In addition to the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, the SIDRA Roundabout Methodology was used to validate the results of HCM 2010 Roundabout analysis and provide a range of analysis results. SIDRA is a computer software program that can analyze Roundabouts using Turn�{eY Page 35 Com nsul nr , LLC Total 2035 Volume (vph) CDOT Turn Lane Warrants Lane Turn Lane (Based on higher F -R Access Classification Warranted? traffic volume of AM Speed Limit = 25 mph or PM peak hour Right -IN Right -OUT (RIRO) Access (Left -turn IN and Out Prohibited) WB Left -turn Deceleration Lane Movement will be Prohibited (inbound) Traffic will make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access EB Right -Turn Deceleration Lane Right -Turn IN More than 50 vph YES (inbound) DHV = 239 NB -WB Left -Turn Acceleration Lane Movement will be Prohibited (Outbound) Traffic will make a U-turn at the Existing Roundabout at the Main Vail Interchange NB -EB Right -Turn Acceleration Lane Right -Turn OUT Not required on multi -lane No (outbound) DHV = 186 highways of this category Table 13 shows that an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane (EB RT Decel Lane) will be required at the VVMC Access to the Frontage Road. The EB RT Decel Lane was included in the roadway configuration for the traffic analysis discussed in the next section. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations was analyzed at the three Study Area intersections. The following sections describe the analysis and results for each Study Area intersection. 6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC Access was analyzed using the FHWA Roundabout Methodology, which utilizes the methods and calculations in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). In addition to the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, the SIDRA Roundabout Methodology was used to validate the results of HCM 2010 Roundabout analysis and provide a range of analysis results. SIDRA is a computer software program that can analyze Roundabouts using Turn�{eY Page 35 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS either 1) the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, or 2) the SIDRA Methodology. The Roundabout analysis was conducted twice for each Methodology, once with the "Default" factors and parameters, and a second time with factors and parameters approved by CDOT and FHWA as part of the System Level Study for the Wolcott traffic study, including: • Critical Gap = 4.05 seconds • Follow Up Headway = 2.50 seconds Proposed Roundabout Location and Configuration The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. The following sections describe the Interim and Build -out conditions, and Roundabout analysis results. 6.1.1 Interim Condition [Year 2018 — Completion of the WMC Reconstruction] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, which is anticipated to be year 2018. Table 14 shows the LOS, delay, and queuing results of the roundabout analysis based on the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology. Table 15 compares the results from the HCM 2010 and SIDRA Roundabout analyses methodologies. The Appendix contains the Roundabout analysis output. Turn�{eY Page 36 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 14 - Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] Roundabout Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LO S — Delay (sec) 95th % Queue (ft) LOS — Delay (sec) 95th % Queue (ft) (FHWA-Approved (Default Factors (Default Factors Approach pp Factors & Parameters) West Leg (Frontage Road) A-5 20 A-9 70 East Leg (Frontage Road A-6 50 A-6 50 South Leg (Evergreen Lodge Access) A-6 20 A-9 20 North Leg TOV Service Access A-6 20 A-6 20 A-7 A-2 (Frontage Road) Overall Roundabout all vehicles A - 6 50 (max) A - 7 70 (max) Table 15 - Roundabout Analysis: Compare Various Methodologies T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 37 cow nsul nr , LLC HCM 2010 SIDRA HCM 2010 SIDRA Roundabout (FHWA-Approved (FHWA-Approved (Default Factors (Default Factors Approach pp Factors & Parameters) Factors & Parameters) & Parameters) & Parameters) LOS — Delay (sec) Year 1 AM Peak West Leg A-5 A-2 B-11 A-2 (Frontage Road East Leg A-6 A-2 A-7 A-2 (Frontage Road) South Leg A-6 A-6 B-10 A-6 (Evergreen Lodge Access North Leg A-6 A-7 B-10 A-7 (TOV Service Access) Overall Roundabout A— 6 A-2 A-9 A-2 Lail vehicles Year 1 AM Peak Hour Leg A-9 A-2 C-22 A-2 (Frontage Road) East Leg A-6 A-2 A-6 A-2 (Frontage Road) South Leg A-9 A-7 C-18 A-7 (Evergreen Lodge Access) North Leg A-6 A-7 A-10 A-7 TOV Service Access Overall Roundabout A— 7 A-2 B-15 A-2 (all vehicles) T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 37 cow nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 6.1.2 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] Refer to the FHU memo for the year 2035 Build -out analysis. 6.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The VVMC Access on the Frontage Road was analyzed using Synchro and SimTraffic software, which is based on the HCM 2010. The analysis included the TOV Site Access as the north leg of the intersection. The following sections describe the Existing, Interim, and Build -out conditions analysis results. 6.2.1 Existing Condition [Year 2014] This analysis is based on the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access. Table 16 shows the analysis results for the Year 2014 Existing Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 16 — WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2014] 6.2.2 East End (Construction Completed) [Year 2018] VVMC has been working from the assumption that a roundabout would be constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC access. That assumption is based on the premise that adjacent properties will redevelop and provide the right-of-way necessary to construct the proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. If the adjacent properties do not redevelop such that the proposed roundabout can not be constructed prior to the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, the VVMC needs an access option that would work in the interim condition prior to the construction of the proposed roundabout. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The following sections describe the possible scenarios that could occur in year 2018 at the completion of the VVMC Master Plan. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 38 Com nsulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound Left -turn A-6 20 A-5 20 (Frontage Road) Westbound Left -turn A-3 50 A-9 40 (Frontage Road) Northbound Left -turn D — 31 40 E — 46 50 Right -turn A-3 A-5 (VVMC Access) Southbound Left -turn C — 18 20 C-23 35 Right -turn B — 12 A-8 (TOVAccess) 6.2.2 East End (Construction Completed) [Year 2018] VVMC has been working from the assumption that a roundabout would be constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC access. That assumption is based on the premise that adjacent properties will redevelop and provide the right-of-way necessary to construct the proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. If the adjacent properties do not redevelop such that the proposed roundabout can not be constructed prior to the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, the VVMC needs an access option that would work in the interim condition prior to the construction of the proposed roundabout. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The following sections describe the possible scenarios that could occur in year 2018 at the completion of the VVMC Master Plan. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 38 Com nsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 6.2.2.1 Existing Roadway Configuration on the Frontage Road The VVMC Access on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) scenario using the existing roadway configuration. Table 17 shows what can be expected at the VVMC Access if Frontage Road improvements (proposed roundabout or "First and Alone" alternative) are not constructed prior to the completion of the East End of the VVMC Campus. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 17 - WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2018] Existina Roadway Confiauration 6.2.2.2 "First and Alone" Alternative As stated in the introduction to Section 6.2.2, VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". These improvements are listed below. The Appendix contains a sketch of the "First and Alone" alternative. The "First and Alone" alternative was analyzed using year 2035 traffic volumes to see how it would operate beyond the completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018. Table 18 shows the results of the "First and Alone" alternative analysis. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. "First and Alone" Alternative Improvements on the Frontage Road • Construct a raised median on the Frontage Road that: o Converts the VVMC Access to RIRO, with a break in the raised median so that emergency vehicles can make a left -turn into VVMC. o Converts the TOV Access to 3/4 with a left -turn acceleration lane for outbound left -turns; the left -turn IN will be prohibited. • Construct an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane at the VVMC Access (per requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code — see Table 13) • Construct a bulb -out at the Evergreen Lodge Main Access that would accommodate westbound to eastbound U-turns. Turn�{eY Page 39 Com nsultinr ,_L L C AM Peak HourPM -- ak Hour mm LOS — Delay 95 th % Queue LOS — Delay 95 th % Queue -. -. Eastbound _ 1 Due to the high volume of EB thru (Frontage -,., traffic (1,075 vph), there will be very _ • " 1 few gaps for WB into the VVMC, left -turns (116 vph) in (Frontage Road) 1 the WB left -turns thru traffic on the which will result blocking the WB Frontage Road. Northbound - F — 57 Access) 1 The WB thru queue will probably _ extend back to the Roundabout at (TOVAccSouthbound - 1 the Main Vail interchange "grid -lock" in that and cause Roundabout. _ • 6.2.2.2 "First and Alone" Alternative As stated in the introduction to Section 6.2.2, VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". These improvements are listed below. The Appendix contains a sketch of the "First and Alone" alternative. The "First and Alone" alternative was analyzed using year 2035 traffic volumes to see how it would operate beyond the completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018. Table 18 shows the results of the "First and Alone" alternative analysis. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. "First and Alone" Alternative Improvements on the Frontage Road • Construct a raised median on the Frontage Road that: o Converts the VVMC Access to RIRO, with a break in the raised median so that emergency vehicles can make a left -turn into VVMC. o Converts the TOV Access to 3/4 with a left -turn acceleration lane for outbound left -turns; the left -turn IN will be prohibited. • Construct an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane at the VVMC Access (per requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code — see Table 13) • Construct a bulb -out at the Evergreen Lodge Main Access that would accommodate westbound to eastbound U-turns. Turn�{eY Page 39 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 18 - WMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] VVMC Access is RIRO. TOV Access is % (Left -turn IN arohibited) 6.2.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] The year 2035 Build -out Condition includes proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. Table 19 shows the analysis results for the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 19 - WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TOV Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Pronosed Roundabout) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Southbound Shared Left- C — 16 30 C — 19 50 TOVAccess and Right -Turn Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 A — 10 105 (VVMC Access) Westbound (Evergreen Lodge U-turn A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access 6.2.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] The year 2035 Build -out Condition includes proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. Table 19 shows the analysis results for the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 19 - WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TOV Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Pronosed Roundabout) 6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End CmT�I.11'17�{eY Page 40 Consulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Northbound Right -turn A-3 45 A-8 95 VVMC Access Southbound Right -turn A-4 35 A-5 50 TOV Access 6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End CmT�I.11'17�{eY Page 40 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Construction). However, the traffic data obtained in February 2014 showed that the peak hour trips to/from the US Bank Building were 36 vph (AM) and 43 (PM). Based on the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection (AM = 316 vph, PM =518 vph), the increase in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive to/from the US Bank Building is only 11% (AM) and 8% (PM). The Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection was analyzed using Synchro and SimTraffic software, which is based on the HCM 2010, to compare the existing Condition to the East End (During Construction) to show the impact of using West Meadow Drive to access the US Bank Building parking. After the East End parking structure is completed, the VVMC main access will be on the Frontage Road. Except for service vehicles, all VVMC trips will use the new VVMC main access on the Frontage Road. The following sections describe the Existing, Interim, and Build -out conditions analysis results. 6.3.1 Existing Condition [Year 2014] This analysis is based on the existing roadway configuration at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection. Table 20 shows the analysis results for the Year 2014 Existing Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 20 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2014] 6.3.2 East End (During Construction) [Year 2017] The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 21 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 41 Com nsultinr ,—L L C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound A-7 55 B — 11 100 (West Meadow Drive) Westbound A-9 50 B — 10 70 (East Meadow Drive) Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 100 (Vail Road) Southbound A-9 95 B — 10 95 (Vail Road) Overall Intersection A-9 95 (max) B — 11 100 (max) all vehicles 6.3.2 East End (During Construction) [Year 2017] The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 21 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 41 Com nsultinr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 21- Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] Table 21 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End parking structure when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. 6.3.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 vehicles per day (based on August 2013 traffic count) to less than 20 trips per day (service vehicles only). The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. Therefore, the year 2035 Build -out Condition was not analyzed at this intersection. 7 Conclusion and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized -,,1 urnn_ey Page 42 ____Consulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) A-7 50 B — 10 95 West Meadow DriveEastbound Westbound A — 10 55 A-9 65 East Meadow Drive)—T Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 90 Vail Road Southbound A — 10 115 B — 11 100 Vail Road Overall Intersection A-9 115 (max) B — 11 100 (max) all vehicles Table 21 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End parking structure when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. 6.3.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 vehicles per day (based on August 2013 traffic count) to less than 20 trips per day (service vehicles only). The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. Therefore, the year 2035 Build -out Condition was not analyzed at this intersection. 7 Conclusion and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized -,,1 urnn_ey Page 42 ____Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. 7.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. The "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access (RIRO) and TOV Access (3/4 movement) thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. 7.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction due to the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building being accesses via West Meadow Drive. However, the increase in traffic at this intersection will only be 11% (AM) and 8% (PM), and there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at this intersection. No changes are recommended at this intersection. Turn�{eY Page 43 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Appendix • Methodology submitted to TOV and CDOT • Traffic Count Data o Winter Season Traffic Counts — February 4, 2014 o Summer Season Traffic Counts —August 21-22, 2013 • Peak Hour Calculations • Project Trip Generation Calculations • Project Trip Distribution Calculations • FHU Email to TOV Regarding Traffic Forecasts • Evergreen Lodge o Select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study prepared in year 2008 o Trip Generation and Distribution Calculations • Traffic Volumes at Study Area Intersections • Proposed Roundabout Analysis Output [Intersection #1] • Frontage Road and VVMC Access Analysis Output [Intersection #2] o "First and Alone" Alternative Sketch • Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Output [Intersection #3] • FHU Memo regarding Proposed Roundabout, dated August 1, 2014 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 44 Com nsultinr ,_L L C Traffic Volume Development — VVMC Master Plan TIS Methodology submitted to TOV and CDOT TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef tend—hip Mark Bunnell From: Tom Kassmel <TKassmel@vailgov.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 2:38 PM To: 'Harbert - CDOT, Kent'; Mark Bunnell Cc: Daniel Roussin; Daniel Feeney; Skip Hudson Subject: RE: Vail Valley Medical Center - Study Area & Traffic Data Methodology Mark, See my response below in bold. • Study area will only include the potential VVMC Main Access (south leg) and TOV municipal building access (north leg) to the 1-70 South Frontage Road. I agree the roundabout does not necessarily be analyzed, however we will have to understand the impacts of a new intersection on the multiple adjacent intersections as Kent suggests. • Collecting traffic counts for two weekday AM & PM peak hour periods will be sufficient to calculate the existing trip generation. I would guess that Summer mid week traffic patterns are significantly lower from winter. would suggest that a winter count be done as well, during a busier time period. The Town of Vail did winter counts along the Frontage Road this past winter that can be used as a comparison. • Existing and future background traffic volumes for the 1-70 South Frontage Road will be based on the Vail MOB traffic study, the Vail TMP, and follow-up work by FHU. Ok From: Harbert - CDOT, Kent[maiIto:kent.harbert@state.co.us] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 4:21 PM To: Mark Bunnell Cc: Daniel Roussin; Tom Kassmel; Daniel Feeney; Skip Hudson Subject: Re: Vail Valley Medical Center - Study Area & Traffic Data Methodology Mark, I am not familiar with the previous study, but based on what you say about it I am okay with not analyzing the roundabout at the interchange. However, I do see that there a half dozen or so access onto the frontage road in proximity to this project that will need to be addressed at some point in the process. Thanks, xent T. Kent Harbert, PE Access Engineer CDOT Region 3, Traffic and Safety Residency 222 South 6t" Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, CO 81501-3794 Phone: 970-683-6279 Cell: 970-812-6768 Fax: 970-683-6290 kent.harbertAstate.co.us On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Mark Bunnell <markbLturnkeyllc.net> wrote: Dan, Kent, and Tom, I am in the very early stages of a traffic study related to a potential master plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) and want to get confirmation on the study area and traffic data. Typically, I would submit a full methodology (study area, traffic data, land use, trip generation & distribution, analysis periods & methods, etc), but at this point we just want to get the traffic counted before the summer season ends. I will submit a full methodology at a later date, assuming the master plan effort moves forward. Please review the details below and provide comments. Project The VVMC is looking at doing a master plan for their Vail campus, but the work is very preliminary and the possible concepts described in this email have not been finalized. The possible redevelopment of the VVMC could change the layout such that the VVMC Main Access would be on the 1-70 South Frontage Road, instead of on West Meadow Dr as it is today. There would possibly be a service access on West Meadow Drive that would not be used by patrons or employees so the future VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive would be lower than existing. Study Area The study area will only include one intersection — the potential VVMC Main Access to the 1-70 South Frontage Road (see aerial image below). The TOV municipal building would be the north leg of the potential VVMC Main Access. y k. a,� n 3y� yWh 0 -Ink .. V -r�..._ We considered including the south roundabout at the Vail interchange in the study area, but did not include it for the following reasons: • The TOV completed an extensive evaluation of alternatives at the Main Vail Interchange Roundabouts as part of the 2025 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Vail TMP). The Vail TMP concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at the interchange, and concluded that other system -wide improvements would be needed to provide an acceptable level of service (LOS) at the interchange. • The Vail TMP discusses how reconfiguring the VVMC so that its main access is on the 1-70 South Frontage Road would improve the south roundabout. On page 37 of the Vail TMP it states: Another consideration listed in Table 6. but not specificalf quantified. is the modi-kation of the Hospital's access. The Vail'Va ley Med con' Centers currently served by Meadow Dare via !fail Road. As SLI ch. nearly all cf its traffic mpacts the south rcund?k044 iMe--section along khe Vail Road (Sc41th) leg. The Center is in the planning process to reconfickare its fac ity such that it might have -rn access directly onto tine Fioni ge Roil .%-est of 91e rounCl,1!. 01L!t across from the M1.1111 ip, I Center This veauld 'shift" scene of th s `a+cilrrr s traViic ori of the south roundabout and off of the south r03dW-3y "leg.. which is projected to operate at a poor LOS. Th,s, scheme requires coordination with the ether near!3y uses: access points. but it could offer a small dose of traffic rel.ef to the heavily -used south roundabout. TurnKey Consulting prepared a traffic study for the Vail Medical Office Building (Vail MOB) in 2012. The traffic study was completed, but not submitted because the Vail MOB project did not continue. The Vail MOB consisted of constructing a medical office building and parking garage on the north side of the 1-70 South Frontage Road adjacent to the TOV municipal building. The Vail MOB / TOV municipal building access (north leg) would have lined up with the potential access to the VVMC main access (south leg). As part of the Vail MOB traffic study, CDOT and the TOV reviewed and approved a methodology that stated that the study area would only include the access to the Vail MOB, and not include the south roundabout at the Vail Interchange for the first reason listed above. Traffic Volume Data TurnKey Consulting plans to calculate the trip generation for the VVMC master plan based on the existing trips to/from the VVMC campus. In order to do that, we plan to conduct traffic counts at the three existing accesses to the VVMC campus for the durations listed below. The trip generation based on the summer season will be factored to the peak season (winter). • AM & PM peak periods (two hours each) • Two Weekdays (Tues & Wed OR Wed & Thur) The existing and future background traffic volumes on the 1-70 South Frontage Road will come from previous studies [Vail MOB traffic study prepared by TurnKey Consulting, Vail TMP, and follow-up work by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) on a potential roundabout at the VVMC / MOB access (see attached memo)]. The previous studies are based on the peak season (winter) so we do not plan on counting the traffic on the 1-70 South Frontage Road. Summary At this point I am looking for confirmation on the following: • Study area will only include the potential VVMC Main Access (south leg) and TOV municipal building access (north leg) to the 1-70 South Frontage Road • Collecting traffic counts for two weekday AM & PM peak hour periods will be sufficient to calculate the existing trip generation • Existing and future background traffic volumes for the 1-70 South Frontage Road will be based on the Vail MOB traffic study, the Vail TMP, and follow-up work by FHU. Please call or email if you have questions. Thanks, Mark Bunnell, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC M: 970-640-2677 O: 970-985-4001 markba-turnkeyllc.net 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 Networks Unlimited FilterIT identified this as CLEAN. Give feedback: This is SPAM • More VVMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Count Data • Winter Season Traffic Counts — February 4, 2014 • Summer Season Traffic Counts —August 21-22, 2013 TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOde hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Counts Collected on Wednesday and Thursday, August 21-22, 2013 08/21/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/21/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/21/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/21/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/21/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/21/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/21/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/21/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/21/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/21/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/21/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/21/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/21/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/21/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/21/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/21/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/22/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/22/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/22/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/22/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/22/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/22/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/22/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/22/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/22/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/22/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/22/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/22/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/22/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/22/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Max PM Peak Hour Max 0000©� Guest Access Service Access Employee Access Total Date/Time (W Meadow Dr) (W Meadow Dr) (Frontage Road) VVMC Trips 2 SB OUT NB IN SB OUT NB IN NB OUTJ SB IN OUT I IN 08/21/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/21/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/21/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/21/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/21/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/21/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/21/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/21/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/21/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/21/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/21/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/21/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/21/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/21/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/21/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/21/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/22/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/22/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/22/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/22/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/22/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/22/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/22/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/22/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/22/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/22/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/22/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/22/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/22/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/22/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Max PM Peak Hour Max 0000©� 21 0 0 17 139 0®000 30 2 0 48 32 ©©000® ®000© ©©000® ©000©® 000©� 00000® 0©00®0 00000 21 0 0 17 139 00000 30 2 0 48 32 ©©000 ®000© 0©000© ®000®0 ®®0000 �000�0 0©00®0 00000 21 0 0 17 139 ©000©® 30 2 0 48 32 ©©000 00000® 0©0000 0000® ©000®® 0�000� 00000 21 0 0 17 139 000000 30 2 0 48 32 0000®0 00000© 00000 12 21 0 0 17 139 44 30 2 0 48 32 Page 1 of 1 3 20 1 60 13 38 9 24 7 22 8 32 2 29 6 19 30 144 23 12 15 19 18 16 19 6 26 15 20 22 29 17 19 8 94 62 4 34 5 61 7 31 13 34 7 12 9 37 17 33 10 22 29 160 13 21 16 13 23 12 24 14 16 8 11 18 21 18 29 21 77 65 29 160 94 62 VVMC Master Plan TIS Peak Hour Calculations TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip U) a� U � CO rn �_ o co CO � CO � CO O cri � � � CO N O N � N N CO � N 00 H � 00 tD O N Lo O O � Q� O 0') C) N cy N 0 0 0 �� 00 N� O O O O � O Q cri cri cri M T cri N m N -00 O O (h (h � I— N LU O � N � Z N (`) N i � � O O l(7 � N � N N N (h 00 (h CO O O � � Q � � N N d � CO O � 00 l(7 � N Y (0 N I� � O o� l(7 O CO l(7 v N l(7 v l(7 O � NT v CD v C.0 v o= iri CO CO o �ci o ui � v o ui o o� O CO l(7 v O o l(7 = O CD LO N LO r r co co M p v E v o Vi o Vi � M (h CO v o � O � l(7 l(7 l(7 co co � � cy CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO ti LO o�crivo CQ � cri v o�c�v ri ri ri ri v v v v �ti iri ori ori G �+ N �..i v i H t4 d �+ LL s 0 0 ti vo Co Co r r r r ao co � CO rn �_ o co CO � CO � CO O cri � � � CO N O N � N N CO � N N H � 00 tD O N Lo O O � Q� O 0') C) N cy N 0 0 0 �� 00 N� O O O O � O Q cri cri cri M T cri N m N -00 O O (h (h � I— N LU O � N � Z N (`) N i � � O O l(7 � N � N N N (h 00 (h CO O O � � Q � � N N CC C � CO O � 00 l(7 � N Y (0 N I� � O o� l(7 O CO l(7 v N l(7 O l(7 O � NT v CD v C.0 v o= iri CO CO o �ci o ui � ui o ui o o� O CO l(7 v O o l(7 = O CD LO N LO r r co co M p v E v o Vi o Vi � M (h CO v o � O � l(7 l(7 l(7 co co � � cy CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO ti LO vo Co Co r r r r ao co � CO O CO CO N � � CO � CO O cri � � � CO N � N � O (h H O O N N � � 00 tD O N Lo O O � Q� O I— l(7 N l(') N 0 0 0 �� 00 N� O O O O � O Q cri cri cri M (ri cri N N N -00 O O (h (h � I— N � O � N � Z N (`) N (`) � I— r O am0 � N N N N N N N N N O � O � Q � Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 � N N I� � O o� l(7 O CO l(7 v O�crivo l(7 O l(7 O � NT v CD v C.0 v o= iri CO CO o �ci o ui � ui o ui o o� CD � o � �c�vo CD LO CD LO CD ri cOvo= ri co p v v v ori v o �crivo M (h (h (h � � �00 3- CD ao rnMo�o� O l(7 � 00 (h 00 CO eco O � �����v � CO CO l(7 l(7 V (h O O O N N � � 00 tD O N Lo O O � Q� CO O � N 00 N 0 0 0 �� 00 I� O O � � � cri cri cri cri M (ri cri N N -00 O O O 00 00 � O I� O (h T O N CO � CO cri � � N a0 N � N N N N N N N N N O � O � Q � Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 � N N I� � O o� l(7 O CO l(7 v O�crivo l(7 O l(7 O � NT v v v p iri iri iri co CO o �ci o ui � ui o ui o o� � CO v p' �c�vo CD LO CD LO CD ri ri ri co p v v v ori v o �crivo M (h (h (h � � �00 � � I� M O l(7 � 00 (h 00 CO N O � l(7 � CO CO l(7 l(7 V (h O O O N N � � 00 tD O N N I� Q1 � O CO N O S 00 N 0 0 0 �� 00 I� O O � � � � O O � � � O O � -00 O a0 N 00 � CO O — ch O T O N CO � CO cri � � N a0 N � O CO l(7 CO CO CO I� � O O � O � (h � Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 O N N I� � a0 a0 a0 l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O � N v M v ori CO � o � CO ~ o �o�o C) � CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO o M �crivo� v v v v cri v o �crivo M (h (h (h � � � � l(7 l(7 l(7 l(7 CO o� l(7 CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO o�crivo � cri v o�c�v ri ri ri ri v v v v �ti iri ori ori CL CL a CL co � N I� M O N N N I� O CO �prnrn O T O ao O O � O l(i N O � N N N � � 00 tD O N N I� Q1 � l(i N M CO � � O � Q 00 — Ico 00 (h 00 (h 00 O N CO O ti � O O � CO � -00 O a0 N 00 � CO O — ch O T � Z I� N� O co (`'� O co (`'� l(7 � I— (`'� N O N O CO O T � C N C C C N C C C C� C � CC C Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 O N N I� � a0 a0 a0 l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O � N v M v ori CO � o � CO ~ o �o�o C) O CO O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 l(7 O ri ri M co v v v v iri M (h (h (h � � � � l(7 l(7 l(7 l(7 CO 8 l(7 8 l(7 8 l(7 O l(7 8 l(7 8 l(7 N Q �L CO � N I� M O N N N I� O CO �prnrn O T O ao O O � O l(i N O � N N N � � 00 tD O N N I� Q1 � l(i N M CO � � O � Q 00 — Ico 00 (h 00 (h 00 O N CO O ti � O O � CO � -00 O a0 N 00 � CO O — ch O T � Z I� N� O co (`'� O co (`'� l(7 � I— (`'� N O N O CO O T � C N C C C N C C C C� C � CC C Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 O N N I� � a0 a0 a0 l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O � N v M v ori CO � o � CO ~ o �o�o C) O CO O l(7 O l(7 CO N N CO O I� CO l(7 N I� O CO 00 O T O O O O O O l(i � O � N N N N � N N (h H I� Q1 � l(i CO I� CO CO O O � l(7 00 — Ico 00 (h 00 (h 00 O N CO N T CO CO CO � CO � -00 O a0 N 00 � CO O � ch O � Z I� N� O co (`'� O co (`'� l(7 � I— (`'� N O N O CO O T � (`'� N N N � N C C C C� C � CC C Q C C CC C CC C CC C N O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O � N v M v ori iri iri iri co ~ o �o�o C) O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 l(7 O ri ri M co v v v v iri M (h (h (h � � CO N O ti 0 I� N N co O N CO 00 O T O O O O O O l(i � (p � N N N N � N N � I� Q1 � l(i CO I� CO CO O O a0 rn p O CO l(7 00 � N N CO N T CO CO CO � CO � a0 N 00 � CO O � ch O rn o p rn ao � co co co � CO O T � (`'� N N N � C C C� C � CC C Q C C CC C CC C CC C N O l(7 l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O v v M v ori iri iri iri co o�ci�ui o �o�o C) l(7 O ',I- o �c�vo O l(7 O l(7 O ri ri M co v v v v iri M (h (h (h � � CO CO CO l(7 l(7 � CO CO O � N CO 00 (`7 (`7 l(i l(i l(i l(i � l(i l(i � (p l(i O l(i I� "T "T O O O O l(7 N O CO l(7 00 � N N CO N CO CO CO CO � CO � O N CO l(7 l(7 00 00 00 � CO O N � (`'� N N N � � N� N l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O (h (h (h � � � � l(7 l(7 l(7 l(7 CO 8 l(7 8 l(7 8 l(7 O l(7 8 l(7 8 l(7 i VVMC Master Plan TIS Project Trip Generation Calculations TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip H > S o F r m v o � N cNo N F O N m o A a V ^ O u m o � F LL S � a E � A o d Q S O C1 O O N M U O a r O w v A ~ o O > Q o S a O N N N O O N N ma Q Q J Q > a~ ~ o ro r of co O A ^ o o O O V o A S � a � 0 a O Z O � V r rn v N N Q% C m 12 U O N � A p _ `o S � o O. f^ V a is r C1 M M O N o N V o ~ O Z N } 0 in (O 0 (O l(J 0 O c O 0 W W O L A U N m N O o a V L = 70 ro ro w w o r1 d U ) g > a a z co r co r co r co r o N m' o ~ O O O O = a O E N y � Q Z v v v v cro ro N m c a O a �a m uoi U 7x u1 u1 u1 u1 � o E m m � c o o N N E w o u`oi coo m m r coo O O O O O Q N U N W N M W � - wU°w EwU°w a12 5 ` E 5 •- o u1 001 c � 0 0 0 0 o r \ a N N N N V V � o O C7 C7 r - 4 U W N " "' LL u cO10 c°10 001 001 0 0 u1 u1 u1 u1 co r -- U o d c d U Tn Tn U = U > S rn rn o r voo� M o r N N d g O V ^ O u m o � F LL S � a E � A a m U m U O V O r O O W m A ~ o O o o N N N O NO r N Q Q J Q > a~ ~ o ro r o c o u (0 o mo V o A S � a � 0 a O Z N � V r rn v N V O N � A S � o O. r C1 M M O N o N V o ~ O Z N } 0 in (O 0 (O l(J 0 O c O 0 W W 0 o1 co A O p` N m N O o a V o . o ri v ri o Q .- a o m -o -oo� O m' www w E LU s ~ S m N O a m uoi U o y = a O N W N M W F Q Z m r m v u1 001 c � 0 0 0 0 o r \ a N N N N V V � o O C7 C7 r - 4 U W N " "' LL u cO10 c°10 001 001 0 0 u1 u1 u1 u1 co r -- � - wU°w EwU°w E o o d c d U Tn Tn U = ij U U m o F o co o r voo� M m co C1 o o � d g 7 O M ^ O u m E a z a m U O V O r o LL � =o A ~ O V0 o N N N O NO r Q J Q > a~ ~ o ro r o c o u N w o mo O � z r rn v o 2E O m N o O. r ~ Q Z V N M (00 N N } v o u1 0 co r 0 0 N m o � u1 M a o U o . o c c mo N c U 6 Q .- .- co -o -oo� m' www w VVMC Master Plan TIS Project Trip Distribution Calculations TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Trip Distribution Calculations VVMC Employee / Bank Bldg Entrance and Frontage Rd Municipal Bldg Frontage Road VVMC Employee Ent Frontage Road Peak Hour From North From East From South From West Total Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left I Thru Ri ht Left I Thru I Right 7:30-8:30 am 5 1 0 3 1 84 265 1 39 1 3 1 0 1 18 1 2 1 193 1 11 623 3:30-4:30 pml 13 1 0 5 1 26 278 1 5 1 2 1 0 1 29 1 2 1 350 1 9 719 Peak Hour # Tri s AM Dist. % USE # Trips PM Dist. % USE Trip Distribution Percentages - Frontage Road (Based on Vehicles IN and OUT at VVMC access on Frontage Road) Inbound Outbound From the East (WB LT) From the West I (EB RT) To the East (NB RT) To the West I (NB LT) 84 11 18 3 88.4% 11.6% 85.7% 14.3% 90% 10% 85% 15% 26 9 29 2 74.3% 25.7% 93.5% 6.5% 75% 25% 95% 5% Vail Road and Meadows Drive Vail Rd W Meadows Dr Vail Rd W Meadows Dr Peak Hour From North From East From South From West Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left I Thru Ri ht Left I Thru I Right 7:30-8:30 am 0 1 143 65 1 0 10 1 0 1 0 1 60 1 0 1 28 1 7 1 3 3:30-4:30 pml 4 1 103 88 1 2 18 1 4 1 4 1 151 1 2 1123 1 10 1 9 Peak Hour # Tri s AM Dist. % USE # Trips PM Dist. % USE Trip Distribution Percentages - Vail Road (Based on Vehicles IN and OUT at Meadow Drive and Vail Road Intersection) Inbound Outbound From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) To the South (EB RT) 88 4 123 9 95.7% 4.3% 93.2% 6.8% 95% 5% 95% 5% Page 1 of 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS FHU Email to TOV Regarding Traffic Forecasts TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip Page 1 of 2 Skip Hudson From: Tom Kassmel [TKassmel@vailgov.com] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 8:23 AM To: Skip Hudson; Michael O'Connor (michael@triumphdev.com) Cc: Greg Hall Subject: FW: VOlumes I asked FHU to weigh in on the growth rate after 2025. See below. From: Chris.Fasching[mailto: Chris. Fasching@FHUENG.COM] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 3:01 PM To: Tom Kassmel Subject: RE: VOlumes Tom, We used 0.5% per year growth in the stud hich is pretty darn flat. I think you could safely apply this rate out to 2034. Thanks. Chris Fasching, PE, PTOE Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 303-721-1440 Fax - 303-721-0832 From: Tom Kassmel rmailto:TKassmel@vailgov.coml Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:58 PM To: Chris.Fasching Subject: VOlumes Chris Would you be able to weigh in on the appropriate growth rate for post 2025. So Turnkey (Skip) can extrapolate to 2034. We all agree it should be relatively flat compared to the growth we project until 2025, your thoughts? Tom Kassmel Town Engineer Public Works Department $1 rowM of v 970.479.2235 vailgov.com twitter.com/vailgov Vs 8/14/2012 VVMC Master Plan TIS Evergreen Lodge Select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study prepared in year 2008 Trip Generation and Distribution Calculations TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip Al T R A N S P R T AT 1 N G R U P October 3, 2008 Mr. Adam Williams ARC Integrated Program Management, Inc. 179038 1h Street, Unit 105 Boulder, CO 80301 RE: Fairmont Vail Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Williams: Fox Higgins has completed a traffic impact analysis for the proposed Fairmont Vail project located on the south side of the S. Frontage Road roughly 850 feet west of the main Vail roundabout. This analysis has been completed following "Level Three" traffic assessment requirements per Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Region 3. Per CDOT requirements, this analysis evaluates potential traffic impacts along the S. Frontage Road with respect to operational considerations and auxiliary lane needs for the short-term build -out and long-term (20 -year) scenarios. Since the project and adjacent roadways are anticipated to generate the highest traffic volumes during the peak winter season, this study analyzes the peak winter scenario for the highest of the AM, PM and Saturday peak hour volumes. This memorandum summarizes our analysis and findings. Project Description The Fairmont Vail project is proposing to redevelop the existing Evergreen Lodge hotel with similar uses to include hotel rooms, on-site restaurant and meeting facilities, fractional -ownership units, and residential condominium units. The project site is located along the S. Frontage Rd. just west of mile marker 176. A vicinity map is provided on Figure 1. Nearby accesses and intersections include the main Vail roundabout (Vail Road and 1-70 interchange) located roughly 850 feet east of the east site access, the existing Lionshead parking structure access located roughly 650 feet west of the west site access, and driveways for adjacent uses to the east. Two access driveways along the S. Frontage Road currently serve the site. These accesses are not shared or used by any other properties. The project proposes to relocate the easternmost access roughly 45 feet to the west of the current location, with the east access to serve only service vehicles with redevelopment. The existing westernmost access will serve as the main site access. This access location may need to be adjusted slightly to accommodate grades, though is shown in roughly the existing access location based on the current site plan. The site plan depicting the existing and proposed access points is shown on Figure 2. P.❑. B❑x 1 9768, BOULDER, G❑L❑RAD❑ 8❑3❑8-2768 PHONE: 303-652-3571 ■ FAx: 3173-772-2329 ❑R 303-652-6574 co O M 0 O r _^ CU C >a U O Q E (B U LL cu 5 O p O m O {y � a F O C — O C h @ M M N N -0 A � O 0 b A � 0— f7A d co f� - M O � r Om h P a IL d eo @ 0 M � o. F0 O co co v co eo V V N ty m ^ T A 0 Y= 1 C — m M Oa m N h T � wN= Y N 0 O) O) V @ d O F W M 0 m CO {y �D m CO m M P p IL O F N O O N !' 2 IL O IL A N O O N 2 O M ep fp o. � M m Cm, N — h N T � A N N o. w = N N N p h C — m LO M m M P � F F T` A � W Y= M O b O N IL ?> A F N a r M A O r CO r CO N p 0 C — N CO N CO N p Oa IL N ep M y F 04 A 0 — 0 d ~ �2 P �2 P 0 0 0 i a o pMp V @ o rP. LO P 0 0 O) N M p A O v ccoo N ro p 0 O ^ w O. C o LO N co co M a `9 p 0 0 o N A O rn O) •— mm O a P Ln w CL ~ fp N NN N CO 7 a CN N A O) A O) mCO co m M O O O 0 ate•"— o 0 0 0 0 O P O O o N z CO c a a a U O OUB U O OU d' U O OU N 0 c N X W d d O CL O 0 0M9= o 0 0 0 z S •� 'oS a a° o 'Q E 'Q E 3 A o U O O U O O E O) .N X W d d 0 a O J 0 0 y _ O O d N S o 9 S w a o O A J -am3 m ° 0 z a a O 7 O C o. at G v J y O W'0O 0 m m m a o W R N 5 O p O m O {y M CL O C @ M N V O b A � 0— f7A d co f� M O � r Om h P a M N N CL F 5 O N m N ty N m N h 0 m M m m N h T � wN= Y C W M 0 m CO {y �D m CO m M P p TjN d O F !' IL N O O N 2 O IL A h N N N o. 5N O N N N p h C — m LO M m m q @ F T` A � W Y= M O b O N cl ?> A F a 04 A — y F 0 V CO pMp V @ @ •� � 0 O F O) O! O) m P @ 0 0 i a o o rn O a `9 p 0 0 o N A O rn v co a O N w CL ~ CN N A O) O! O) O) m M P p F P -e N N N N CO i a O 0 a N'�— o 0 0 0 0M9= o 0 0 0 z c 'Q E 'Q E 'Q E M U O O U O O U O O O) .N X W d d 0 a O N 0 0 _ S s S a` A -am3 0 a 0 O 7 O C o. J y O 0 d ] w0 a o O 9 J m o Z a G v y L at G v � W 0 m m m W R N a M a d N fC 2 CU G i7 i 00 0 a o z m oN N ik m O m A v m c2 O H H o O a Z W O W H ie O r V W M O H H = o o V O z o 0 � � N U U! No W V W c� o - O � � K O _ � O Y O O w a + + Q X X L O J J � A O rorn W O O Y � II II m A F F a J J G \ \a. a oo � 00 -tea o m Y = G1 ° O 7 V 77 o H = F � m N O D = o 0 m z 0 0 N\O �O � a W v '- w a m N � A v � Q o 0 N m O O W � N O + _ + y X w o X a - J w 00 II II F F J V I� V (O O OoIr ~ N V r O. Z_ V N O a ik r co r� F O O r O H ° O. Z V N O H O r (O O (O O H = 0 0 ° M V O z o 0 (�O N U! � � K O O Y A N O U! M a + L O J � A 0 Q m rn W 00 II II Y � ~ F (Q A � J \ \ G 00 � N � � Q N � � � O °8 Z F m O N W F O O N M K °8 c 7 � a Z � >N fl - 2 Ll U F O O N U O F N_ W M U! N O '6 N = O c U A U N O 6 = O c U N A � J - N O N d O N O M N O O M N M N c N � � Q N � O K -a � U O � � O °8 Z F m O N W F M N O U! N O '6 = O c U A � J - N N d N O O O M N � M VVMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Volumes at Study Area Intersections TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip � lollsmom 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 smilloom 1111111M smillsom IN111111 smilloom III iioo iioiiiio iioiiiio 11111111111111111111111111 � 0110 21111112 01111110 01111110 1111111101111110 INS11 somilloll INS111111 INS111111 sommillis somilloll a 1110 01111110 01111110 01111110 1111111111111111 u gill 11211119 11111111111111111111111111211111 11 11111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 •' aiieeiieiiiieiieiieiieiiiieiieiiieiieiiiie I� @IIS M111111M 21111112 91111119 m ■opo ■o■lio■o millions millions millions millions O N ONr N (O Mr NIS N O V M N NN O p) V NOO"t rO N O OM N O ON O p r O s¢� Y F O 00 O O O O � O O o F M M M M M M M M M M M N N _ 4 Q O O oro N O 0 N O O O O ro O r O � � F O � Z J N N N N V V M M O O w W m a Y � O 0 d s 3 V N N W (O (O V V N N V 0 O O O M M N W V V H _ ui -6 a O O m N O O M M V V Ci V W O O M M (O w O O N N M M O m Q 4 M W m O O N O O O O O N m r r r 11N r r OW Q J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N _ cU ,� C .�- 7 M r � U � U -1 > ; Z N M V O N > R f0 y6 0 O M N W V O V c (O N N M O r M V N O M O -,t N O O M N N O (O N (0O m O N a LL H VNNO ¢matia`am Q Q�-sZaO�p ONM ONWMr ONMr OMNNMr OMNOMr OMNNMr O LL 'o 0 NM tr NN O N 1 1 0 O O O O O O O OM M M N N O O m m QOmN o2 N NO -O1 1 O O N O N N N M N W M N M Ni W WmO O N NW 11 O O O O p OO N N N N B p� 3 M N N 0 w m M V V 4 a� N � F m m V V V w V m V m V O N O N N N N N V (O V (O W Q F N N o p N N N N N N N N M M m F Q N N O N r F O N U Z — W O O O N M > N N m .. '0 m '0 U m 2 '0 U m 2 'o U m 2 '0 U m 2 '0 U m 2 ` po m tr m m m U J F F Z Z Z Z m O m m m> m> U J m O m m> m> U J m O m m> m> U J m O m m> m> U J m o m m> m> U J (n U m m Q a m U m U m w o umi Q m m Q w m m Q w m m Q N m Q w o ,U� N m m U 0 U o - m .- m N m m U U °� U H 0 N m m U U m U O 0 N m m U U m U O 0 N m m U w U o U H 0 O N m m U U m U H 0 -�- � Q�U� o Q�U� o Q�U� o <>< Q>U� ~ oQ2� > o >0 > o >0 > o >0 > o > >¢ o > LL 0 > LL > > LL > > LL > > LL > > LL 0 > > F F U F F U F F U F F U F F U F 6 V O O d > 0 d O O O O M O } >� m a m O o o 0 v v Us o' E O W U N o' W E O NU -a o d xxa w w Q > > 'N U v w` w V — m .0 > 0 0 O 0 O R 0 0 C N 0) a` a 0 m 0 m M M 0) 1T a (4 W r-00 O) 0) O O O N N S co 0 O 00 O In CO � N r, r 00 r- O M � N r O N O In co r 117 M M r co r 117 co M V H co O) 00 a1 O r O O O O N O O r N C �[ co O 00 Lo r 04 -It r In r r f- O r N N r N c a O -0i M co O O M O V O -It O 'IT O 'It O Lo O 0 O Ln O In O V H O � a N N N N N N N N N N N N N c O N N co M M M V -It co 00 t ~ In In 117 Lti 117 LI) 117 L() In L() 117 CO LD r � O Z J V O V LoO O r O co M O V O O O O O O Y N � � o d i W 00 00 OD 00 O2 00 OD 00 OD 00 O O ~ J N N N N N N N N N N N N N a ` O In V Q) to In N r In M 00 In V O In O N . O LD c 0 0= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � a � W g H M O) V M f` N L O O 00 O) M N � O W � N O r V r V � V N O V In In In N In to 00N o O UZ s'a ICA N C2 O fD 0 N Ln M M (D V LD cf LnLn N 00 Ln Lo O Ln W M Ln N N 1` N M N M NN N M N M N N N o_Ln O L!') N p O r O r rOOOONN NNOCD N V LD p N N a N M N N Lfl 00 N N N M M M V � V a Ln N CD w O) V V - V V J O O O O O O O O O O O O O c _ 0 ° ° 2 t 0 0 0 0 0 r` rte~ O O (D c0 (D CO fD CO fD CO fD c0 (D O Z J O O cc O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O -� O O O O O O O O O O O Oco O 0 O �° a Ho a co N Mp r N r N M r N M -0 r r O r c p 0 3 wH cc W u J co O O N O O O N -7, M O O O O O O O N _ N W Is Z ID a v N a N a N a w a In a co c c C C c c °O L) H Q — O rn O H Q O H Q O H Q O H Q O H Q ~ F F F H H F w c Q .c ~ L) m LY) m L) m L) co m L) m m V cIn CD r W Ln O O O O O O M O N � N N N N N 0) c fl a C U a a W N O -° C 0 a a C y c) O N 0 w c c a) W U Lu c a) N 1T O p) O "O O a c 0 0 W w.5 w m o M M 0) 1T a VVMC Master Plan TIS Proposed Roundabout Analysis Output [Intersection #1] • Year 2018 AM Peak Hour • Year 2018 PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 AM Peak Hour • HCM 2010— FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • HCM 2010 — Default Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — Default Factors and Parameters TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 r W aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 8 T1 1 18 R2 70 Approach 0.114 88 East: 170 S FR 0.4 1u U 213 1 L2 51 6 T1 800 16 R2 1 Approach 3.0 1065 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 4 T1 1 14 R2 1 Approach 50.9 3 West: 170 S FR 3.0 5 L2 1 2 T1 521 12 R2 13 Approach 6.2 535 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 24.0 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 3.7 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 22.2 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 22.3 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 24.5 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 13.7 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 24.0 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 13.1 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 23.6 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 23.7 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 4.1 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 22.0 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 16.5 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 13.2 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 24.5 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 13.2 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 24.2 3.0 0.387 5.9 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.21 0.13 23.7 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:17:50 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_HCM Wolcott.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS B A B B A 0 r aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 8 T1 1 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 18 R2 70 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 Approach 88 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 213 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 1 L2 51 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 6 T1 800 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 16 R2 1 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 Approach 1065 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 4 T1 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 14 R2 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 Approach 3 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 2 T1 521 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 12 R2 13 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 Approach 535 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.437 8.7 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.27 0.20 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Friday, August 01, 2014 8:14:01 AM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Ana lysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_HCM Default.sip6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC 22.2 3.4 20.7 20.7 24.2 13.6 23.7 12.9 23.3 22.0 3.9 20.6 15.4 12.4 23.0 12.4 22.7 23.0 SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 r W Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 8 T1 1 18 R2 70 Approach 0.154 88 East: 170 S FR 0.6 1u Ll 213 1 L2 51 6 T1 800 16 R2 1 Approach 3.0 1065 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 4 T1 1 14 R2 1 Approach 81.0 3 West: 170 S FR 3.0 5 L2 1 2 T1 521 12 R2 13 Approach 0.6 535 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.154 8.7 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 24.9 3.0 0.154 4.3 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 3.8 3.0 0.154 4.8 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 23.0 3.0 0.154 5.6 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 23.1 3.0 0.394 7.0 LOS A 3.2 81.0 0.16 0.37 26.0 3.0 0.394 5.5 LOS A 3.2 81.0 0.16 0.37 14.6 3.0 0.394 0.6 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 0.18 25.4 3.0 0.394 1.5 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 0.09 13.8 3.0 0.394 2.1 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 0.23 25.0 i 3.0 0.006 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 24.5 3.0 0.006 4.9 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 4.3 3.0 0.006 5.3 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 22.7 3.0 0.006 6.5 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 17.0 3.0 0.247 7.0 LOS A 1.4 36.0 0.48 0.31 13.5 3.0 0.247 2.1 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.48 0.30 25.1 3.0 0.247 2.9 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.47 0.30 13.5 3.0 0.247 2.1 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.48 0.30 24.8 3.0 0.394 2.3 LOS A 3.2 81...3............................._0.29.................................._0..28.........................._24.8 _.._...._..... Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:21:59 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 PM Peak Hour • HCM 2010— FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • HCM 2010 — Default Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — Default Factors and Parameters TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 061 r .1.. W aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 8 T1 1 18 R2 75 Approach 0.160 80 East: 170 S FR 0.5 1u U 140 1 L2 82 6 T1 791 16 R2 2 Approach 3.0 1015 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 4 T1 1 14 R2 1 Approach 46.8 4 West: 170 S FR 3.0 5 L2 1 2 T1 1136 12 R2 27 Approach 5.9 1164 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 22.7 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 3.2 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 21.1 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 20.9 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 24.7 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 13.8 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 24.1 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 13.1 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 23.3 i 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 23.5 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 4.3 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 21.9 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 18.2 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 12.7 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 23.6 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 12.8 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 23.4 3.0 0.499 7.4 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.29 0.21 23.3 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:31:04 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-PM_HCM Wolcott.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 r W Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.204 11.1 LOS B 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 24.0 8 T1 1 3.0 0.204 6.8 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 3.4 18 R2 75 3.0 0.204 7.2 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.2 Approach 80 3.0 0.204 7.4 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.1 East: 170 S FR 1 u Ll 140 3.0 0.370 6.9 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 26.2 1 L2 82 3.0 0.370 5.4 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 14.6 6 T1 791 3.0 0.370 0.5 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.17 25.5 16 R2 2 3.0 0.370 1.4 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.08 13.9 Approach 1015 3.0 0.370 1.8 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.20 24.7 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.008 9.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 24.3 4 T1 1 3.0 0.008 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 4.5 14 R2 1 3.0 0.008 5.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 22.5 Approach 4 3.0 0.008 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 18.7 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.517 7.3 LOS A 3.8 97.3 0.57 0.35 13.4 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.57 0.35 24.9 12 R2 27 3.0 0.517 3.2 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.34 13.5 Approach 1164 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.35 24.6 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.517 2.3 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.35 0.30 24.6 ....._........ Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:33:07 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS c A A c B a4 ' 90 � � P ti r a MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 8 T1 1 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 18 R2 75 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 Approach 80 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 140 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 1 L2 82 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 6 T1 791 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 16 R2 2 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 Approach 1015 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 4 T1 1 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 14 R2 1 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 Approach 4 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 12 R2 27 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 Approach 1164 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.765 14.8 LOS B 7.8 200.1 0.46 0.46 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Friday, August 01, 2014 8:11:26 AM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Ana lysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-PM_HCM Default.sip6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC 19.6 2.8 18.4 18.3 24.6 13.7 24.0 13.1 23.3 22.0 4.1 20.6 17.0 11.2 20.7 11.2 20.5 SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 r W Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.204 11.1 LOS B 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 24.0 8 T1 1 3.0 0.204 6.8 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 3.4 18 R2 75 3.0 0.204 7.2 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.2 Approach 80 3.0 0.204 7.4 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.1 East: 170 S FR 1 u Ll 140 3.0 0.370 6.9 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 26.2 1 L2 82 3.0 0.370 5.4 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 14.6 6 T1 791 3.0 0.370 0.5 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.17 25.5 16 R2 2 3.0 0.370 1.4 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.08 13.9 Approach 1015 3.0 0.370 1.8 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.20 24.7 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.008 9.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 24.3 4 T1 1 3.0 0.008 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 4.5 14 R2 1 3.0 0.008 5.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 22.5 Approach 4 3.0 0.008 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 18.7 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.517 7.3 LOS A 3.8 97.3 0.57 0.35 13.4 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.57 0.35 24.9 12 R2 27 3.0 0.517 3.2 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.34 13.5 Approach 1164 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.35 24.6 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.517 2.3 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.35 0.30 24.6 ....._........ Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:33:07 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC VVMC Master Plan TIS Frontage Road and VVMC Access / TOV Access [Intersection #2] • Year 2014 — Existing Condition • Year 2018 — East End (Construction Completed) o Existing Conditions o "First and Alone" Alternative ■ Sketch ■ Analysis Output • Year 2035 — Build -out Condition NOTE. The VVMC Access and TOV Access are offset by approximately 100 -feet. Because of the offset, they were modeled as two Tee -intersections to account for the impact of the offset. In the Synchro and Sim Traffic analysis output, the VVMC Access is listed as Intersection #2, and the TOV Access is Intersection #20. TurnKey Consulting. LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2014 - Existing Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 477 11 84 707 3 18 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1853 0 2006 1863 1635 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 1853 0 2006 1863 1635 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.60 0.60 0.92 0.60 0.60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 536 0 140 768 35 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 493 788 39 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1713 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1713 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.60 0.92 0.92 0.60 0.60 0.60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 536 857 65 13 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.4 3.3 0.3 31.0 3.2 0.6 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 6.1 0.1 1.3 0.2 17.6 11.5 0.9 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 11 47 64 32 Average Queue (ft) 0 23 4 14 95th Queue (ft) 6 48 30 37 Link Distance (ft) 466 54 148 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 30 0 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB SB Directions Served L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 12 103 27 Average Queue (ft) 1 6 5 95th Queue (ft) 10 59 22 Link Distance (ft) 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 31 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 982 9 26 727 2 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1859 0 2006 1863 1623 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 1859 0 2006 1863 1623 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.92 0.50 0.50 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1085 0 52 790 62 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 1009 748 5 13 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1729 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.965 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1729 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.50 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1097 813 10 36 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.0 0.8 9.3 0.2 46.2 4.5 0.9 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) Total Network Performance 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.0 23.0 8.2 0.7 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.3 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 4 38 40 59 Average Queue (ft) 0 15 2 20 95th Queue (ft) 3 41 22 48 Link Distance (ft) 466 54 148 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 0 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB SB Directions Served L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 9 75 48 Average Queue (ft) 0 3 12 95th Queue (ft) 5 51 35 Link Distance (ft) 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 39 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 - East End (Construction Completed) Existing Conditions • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 523 21 191 775 9 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1852 0 2006 1863 1637 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 1852 0 2006 1863 1637 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 596 0 255 842 83 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 574 963 39 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.75 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 624 1047 52 11 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.7 0.4 4.4 0.6 56.6 10.4 1.8 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) Total Network Performance 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 2.8 0.4 18.2 15.7 1.9 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 19 51 80 115 Average Queue (ft) 1 34 23 35 95th Queue (ft) 9 49 75 79 Link Distance (ft) 466 0 54 148 Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 0 15 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 13 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 104 1 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB WB SB Directions Served L T R LR Maximum Queue (ft) 9 261 48 27 Average Queue (ft) 0 28 2 5 95th Queue (ft) 5 134 47 22 Link Distance (ft) 467 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 121 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ + Vii r Volume (vph) 1077 39 116 797 8 148 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1852 0 2006 1863 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1852 0 2006 1863 1770 1583 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1223 0 155 866 11 197 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 1223 908 5 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.75 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1329 987 7 11 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 679.2 705.7 2.7 3.7 524.5 307.6 474.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 69.5 71.6 81.1 1.2 850.2 43.5 50.0 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) Total Network Performance 0.0 691.5 729.8 0.1 0.1 402.8 0.3 110.8 0.4 280.8 632.0 48.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 657.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 94.6 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB NB Directions Served TR L T L R Maximum Queue (ft) 354 37 57 92 120 Average Queue (ft) 242 27 43 37 69 95th Queue (ft) 618 42 59 107 146 Link Distance (ft) 466 42 149 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 49 17 54 6 22 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 495 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 67 54 Queuing Penalty (veh) 534 63 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB EB WB WB SB Directions Served L T T R LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 4 485 479 74 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 296 241 19 95th Queue (ft) 4 4 637 628 73 Link Distance (ft) 42 467 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 53 48 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1093 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 - East End (Construction Completed) "First and Alone" Alternative • Sketch • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip .5'a ,Irk ra ,rx A A -A":101 V VA C A F /1'a 000, A edlidwf vvzv ape -in A/gkT QvT "First and Alone" Alternative Td V rz'r a,, 7-1 9 0 A— of,- e e rl api l r2 of✓ri�Jt.� 1�«ellw,l lin e -A*I`weeh * NO pQA-Ha%Q d a"r 67 r VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 9/30/2014 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 Lane Group EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft Zli tt Volume (vph) 607 0 215 47 921 16 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.891 Flt Protected 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1643 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1643 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 200 300 200 Travel Time (s) 5.5 8.2 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 660 0 234 51 1001 17 70 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 660 0 0 285 1001 87 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 9/30/2014 --I. .4--- t/o.i II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r Volume (vph) 0 647 239 0 1179 57 0 0 72 7 0 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.993 0.865 0.955 Flt Protected 0.968 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 1722 0 Flt Permitted 0.968 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 1722 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 300 380 200 200 Travel Time (s) 8.2 10.4 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 703 260 0 1282 62 0 0 78 8 0 4 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 703 260 0 1344 0 0 0 78 0 12 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2035 - Build-out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.3 4.9 5.3 0.3 45.8 16.4 1.9 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 3.5 16.4 4.7 0.5 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.8 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 Intersection: 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB EB WB NB T T UL LR 5 3 116 126 0 0 54 48 4 3 93 95 168 168 125 1 0 200 Intersection: 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) B203 NB SB T R LTR 11 70 34 0 29 9 7 55 31 92 114 126 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative Lanes, Volumes, Timings 9/30/2014 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 Lane Group EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft tt Volume (vph) 1265 0 137 75 987 4 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.872 Flt Protected 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1619 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1619 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 200 300 200 Travel Time (s) 5.5 8.2 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 1375 0 149 82 1073 4 75 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1375 0 0 231 1073 79 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 9/30/2014 --I. .4--- t/o.i II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r 41 Volume (vph) 0 1288 183 0 1189 85 0 0 186 22 0 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.990 0.865 0.958 Flt Protected 0.967 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 1726 0 Flt Permitted 0.967 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 1726 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 300 380 200 200 Travel Time (s) 8.2 10.4 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1400 199 0 1292 92 0 0 202 24 0 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1400 199 0 1384 0 0 0 202 0 35 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 13.3 14.7 0.3 139.6 34.6 2.6 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 9.1 19.4 6.3 1.1 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 Intersection: 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Movement EB EB WB NB B105 Directions Served T T UL LR T Maximum Queue (ft) 8 11 139 153 26 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 71 55 2 95th Queue (ft) 5 7 122 125 24 Link Distance (ft) 168 168 125 72 Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement B203 B203 NB SB Directions Served T T R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 16 18 127 61 Average Queue (ft) 1 1 59 21 95th Queue (ft) 8 8 103 51 Link Distance (ft) 92 92 114 126 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 — Build -out Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj­f tead­hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 � � i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r r Volume (vph) 0 654 239 0 1179 57 0 0 72 0 0 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 500 200 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 13.6 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 711 260 0 1344 0 0 0 78 0 0 12 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out SimTraffic Performance Report 7/31/2014 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 2.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.4 2.9 4.4 0.6 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 1.0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out Intersection: 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement NB SB Directions Served R R Maximum Queue (ft) 55 33 Average Queue (ft) 23 10 95th Queue (ft) 44 34 Link Distance (ft) 146 160 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 7/31/2014 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 � � i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r r Volume (vph) 0 1310 183 0 1189 85 0 0 186 0 0 32 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 500 200 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 13.6 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1424 199 0 1384 0 0 0 202 0 0 35 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out SimTraffic Performance Report 7/31/2014 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 2.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6 8.2 4.7 1.1 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 1.7 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out Intersection: 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement WB NB SB Directions Served TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 4 124 48 Average Queue (ft) 0 51 22 95th Queue (ft) 4 95 49 Link Distance (ft) 472 146 160 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 7/31/2014 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] Year 2014 — Existing Condition Year 2017 — East End (During Construction) TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2014 - Existing Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 28 7 3 1 10 1 1 60 1 1 143 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1116 0 Flt Permitted 0.965 0.996 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1116 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 41 0 0 13 0 0 67 0 0 227 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.5 9.3 7.9 9.0 8.5 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 9.8 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Intersection: I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 65 68 67 122 24 14 33 55 53 50 56 93 384 491 466 426 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 123 10 9 2 18 4 4 151 2 4 103 88 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1093 0 Flt Permitted 0.959 0.996 0.999 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1093 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 155 0 0 26 0 0 170 0 0 212 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.5 10.2 12.0 10.4 10.9 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 12.1 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Intersection: I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 136 79 131 131 54 26 55 56 99 70 100 96 384 491 466 426 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2017 - East End (During Construction) • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 --1. .4--- t II i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 30 7 3 1 10 1 1 61 1 1 145 80 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1109 0 Flt Permitted 0.964 0.996 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1109 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 44 0 0 13 0 0 68 0 0 246 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.9 9.5 7.8 9.9 9.2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 9.8 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Intersection: I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 38 48 43 96 23 18 35 63 50 56 54 114 384 491 466 426 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 --1. .4--- t II i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 128 10 9 2 18 4 4 153 2 4 105 95 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1091 0 Flt Permitted 0.958 0.996 0.999 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1091 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 160 0 0 26 0 0 172 0 0 221 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.4 9.2 11.5 10.6 10.7 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 12.0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Intersection: I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 116 81 114 129 54 24 53 59 94 66 89 101 384 491 466 426 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS FHU Memo Regarding Proposed Roundabout TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip M A FELSBURG ' HOLT & ULLEVIG connecting and enhancing communities August 1, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, Town of Vail FROM: Chris Fasching SUBJECT: Evergreen, VVMC, Municipal Center Roundabout FHU Reference 14-236 Introduction Various redevelopments are being considered along both sides of the South Frontage Road west of the Main Vail roundabout. One area includes the Municipal Center in which the existing eastern Municipal Center building would remain, but the western building would be replaced with a parking structure. Across the South Frontage Road, Evergreen and the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) are contemplating redevelopment as well. This memorandum specifically explores the nuances of various access schemes with respect to a roundabout intersection serving these uses. It is already anticipated that the roundabout would need to two lanes to function (and this analysis confirms that notion). Traffic Projections Peak hour traffic projections used in the analysis were developed from the long term projections from the latest travel demand model runs which were made in support of planning and design for the 1-70 underpass project near Simba Run. Further, available peak hour trip generation estimates associated with a potential Evergreen redevelopment and of a VVMC expansion have been accounted. The parking structure was assumed to contain 325 spaces in which one-half would be associated with a directional peak hour trip (inbound in the morning and outbound in the evening). Table 1 shows the various trip -making components and their assumed peak hour trip generation. These serve as the basis for analysis in assessing varying access scenarios. The VVMC has the potential of generating the greatest amount of traffic of the three uses, although the impact could end up being less than that shown. It should be noted that the estimates shown in Table 1 are rough at this point as the character and scale of each redevelopment is still evolving. 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 t,l �03.721.1440 fax 303.721.0832 wwwAl7ueng.com infogfliueng.coin August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 2 Table 1 Peak Hour Traffic Components and Trip Estimates** * AM (PM) Peak hour in vehicles per hour. **Through traffic along the Frontage Road used in this was based on latest travel demand model run in support of 1-70 Underpass project. Access Alternatives A design charette, held July 16, 2014 in Vail, resulted in three fundamental alternatives to be analyzed; each has a sub -option as well. The primary alternatives locate the roundabout in a slightly different location along the Frontage Road, and the sub -options pertain to adjustments in access locations. The exception is Alternative 3a in which parcel access is the same as Alternative 3, but the roundabout is replaced with a U-turn bulb -out instead. Each alternative has been conceptually laid out and shown at the end of this memo. One of the constraints in locating the roundabout is to ensure it does not cross the 1-70 barrier line. Traffic Operations Sidra software was used to assess the operational aspects of a roundabout via calculating Level of Service (LOS). The analysis first assessed whether any form of a one -lane roundabout might suffice; it won't. A full two-lane roundabout is needed given the traffic numbers in Table 1. This was found to be the case for all the alternatives analyzed; two lanes are needed and would be sufficient even for those in which U -turning traffic would add demand. Further, two -lanes will be required along the Frontage Road approaches into the roundabout to achieve at least a LOS C under ideal conditions (actually, LOS B is achieved in every case). The one nuance revealed by the roundabout analysis pertains to the traffic queues that could form upon entering the roundabout. Specifically, the WB Frontage Road approach was found to potentially queue back past the parking structure entrance in Alternative 1 (more -so in Alternative 1a). This suggests that driveway access points onto the Frontage Road (that do not directly connect into the roundabout) should be located at least 125 feet from the roundabout along its entry leg. A sub -option in several of the alternatives pertains to the provision of a left -in to the VVMC. The analysis suggests that this left in movement could operate at LOS B with queues that could be accommodated in a 100 -foot lane. All the alternatives would allow flexibility in the event that this left -in movement exceeds the projection; the downstream roundabout would have excess capacity to accommodate it in the form of a U-turn. Comparisons Table 2 shows a matrix that simply highlights nuances and a few differences between the alternatives. Inbound* Outbound* Component From West From East TO West TO East VVMC 24 (50) 217 (150) 11 (10) 64 (192) Evergreen Lodge 12 (25) 47 (75) 16 (4) 64 (69) Parking Structure 40 (15) 125 (40) 10 (40) 25 (125) * AM (PM) Peak hour in vehicles per hour. **Through traffic along the Frontage Road used in this was based on latest travel demand model run in support of 1-70 Underpass project. Access Alternatives A design charette, held July 16, 2014 in Vail, resulted in three fundamental alternatives to be analyzed; each has a sub -option as well. The primary alternatives locate the roundabout in a slightly different location along the Frontage Road, and the sub -options pertain to adjustments in access locations. The exception is Alternative 3a in which parcel access is the same as Alternative 3, but the roundabout is replaced with a U-turn bulb -out instead. Each alternative has been conceptually laid out and shown at the end of this memo. One of the constraints in locating the roundabout is to ensure it does not cross the 1-70 barrier line. Traffic Operations Sidra software was used to assess the operational aspects of a roundabout via calculating Level of Service (LOS). The analysis first assessed whether any form of a one -lane roundabout might suffice; it won't. A full two-lane roundabout is needed given the traffic numbers in Table 1. This was found to be the case for all the alternatives analyzed; two lanes are needed and would be sufficient even for those in which U -turning traffic would add demand. Further, two -lanes will be required along the Frontage Road approaches into the roundabout to achieve at least a LOS C under ideal conditions (actually, LOS B is achieved in every case). The one nuance revealed by the roundabout analysis pertains to the traffic queues that could form upon entering the roundabout. Specifically, the WB Frontage Road approach was found to potentially queue back past the parking structure entrance in Alternative 1 (more -so in Alternative 1a). This suggests that driveway access points onto the Frontage Road (that do not directly connect into the roundabout) should be located at least 125 feet from the roundabout along its entry leg. A sub -option in several of the alternatives pertains to the provision of a left -in to the VVMC. The analysis suggests that this left in movement could operate at LOS B with queues that could be accommodated in a 100 -foot lane. All the alternatives would allow flexibility in the event that this left -in movement exceeds the projection; the downstream roundabout would have excess capacity to accommodate it in the form of a U-turn. Comparisons Table 2 shows a matrix that simply highlights nuances and a few differences between the alternatives. August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 3 Table 2 Roundabout Conceptual Design Options Matrix Alt. Description Notes Roundabout is located at the Roundabout will function at LOS B given ideal west end of the municipal center conditions. and would provide access into The parking structure would not be easily accessed 1 Evergreen. The parking from the west. structure would be accessed via Right-in/right out driveway from Parking Structure onto a right-in/right-out. The WMC Frontage Road may be too close to the roundabout. would be provided a 3/4 access. Retaining wall likely needed along south and west sides of roundabout. Roundabout would serve more traffic than Alt. 1, but still operate at LOS B given ideal conditions. The parking structure would not be easily accessed from the west. Roundabout is located in same EB approaching traffic into roundabout would stack past location as described above. to the Parking Structure right-in/right-out; this is more 1a The WMC would be served via critical in 1a than in 1. a right-in/right out only, other Emergency vehicles entering from the east would have than emergency traffic which a clear turn lane. could turn left into the facility. Retaining wall likely needed along south and west sides of roundabout. Possible driver expectancy issues in forcing lefts through roundabout; significant advance signage needed. Roundabout is shifted to the east (in the vortex are related to Roundabout will function at LOS B given ideal new helipad site), located conditions. roughly mid -point of the Smooth parking structure entry operations would be 2 Evergreen frontage. The required to preclude queuing into roundabout. parking structure would access directly into roundabout, and VVMC would be served via a3/4 access. Roundabout is located in the Roundabout LOS would be A given ideal conditions. same location as described Patterns through the roundabout would be simpler 2a above. The right -in to the compared to 2 (no longer accommodating an EB left parking structures is shifted to nor a WB right). the east out of the roundabout. The parking structure will not be easily accessed from the west. August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 4 Summary A two-lane roundabout will function at LOS B in ideal conditions for any of the alternatives considered. Sensitivity to access placement is needed for some alternatives such that driveways are not too close to the entry legs of the roundabout and end up being blocked at peak times. Property owners should evaluate the constraints and opportunities with respect to their needs of redevelopment towards developing a balanced solution. This memo provides additional fodder in support of additional consideration and discussion. Roundabout would function at a LOS B in ideal conditions. Roundabout is located to the May defy driver expectation given that there would not west up against Middle Creek be any kind of cross street connecting to roundabout. and is used to serve WB to EB The parking structure will not be easily accessed from u -turns (which includes left -in the west. Roundabout could also be used for EB to WB U-turns, 3 traffic for Evergreen, left -in traffic perhaps those exiting the Lionshead parking structure for VVMC, and left -out traffic desiring travel west; a right turn followed by a U-turn from parking structure). No may be easier than a left turn at peak times. direct access would be provided This option could incorporate an emergency left -in lane via the roundabout. for VVMC and/or a left -in lane to Evergreen. Retaining wall needed along south side of roundabout. Potential headwall/wing-wall work pertaining to Middle Creek. The U-turn traffic will operate at LOS C in ideal conditions, but this approach lane could see 250 -foot queues during the PM peak hour (reduced to 150 feet Roundabout is replaced with a +/- if a left -in is allowed at VVMC). This could be formal U-turn "bulb -out" area, challenging for parking structure traffic exiting that 3a which would be located in facility and needing to complete several lane changes approximately the same location in a relative short distance. as the roundabout in Alternative This option could incorporate an emergency left -in lane 3. for VVMC and/or a left -in lane to Evergreen. Retaining wall needed on south side of roundabout. Potential headwall/wing-wall work pertaining to Middle Creek. Summary A two-lane roundabout will function at LOS B in ideal conditions for any of the alternatives considered. Sensitivity to access placement is needed for some alternatives such that driveways are not too close to the entry legs of the roundabout and end up being blocked at peak times. Property owners should evaluate the constraints and opportunities with respect to their needs of redevelopment towards developing a balanced solution. This memo provides additional fodder in support of additional consideration and discussion. CO r O CL 0 fi I r� fff I m.. Q CAL, ° v � / a U) Cf) LO N 0) s cli f -M Ul "19 I To r I O 4 ` .. I t 40 C'7 i Z / O, F 0 co L. i Cf) Cf) N 0) co L d / / IT it I �m r I I � � I w I / I I ca co I z o coL. IL Cf) Cf) I O s LO / VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER WEST WING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 50 March 13, 2015, revised March 18, 2015 t VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER WEST WING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 50 March 13, 2015, revised March 18, 2015 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER West Wing Conditional Use Permit Application January 2015, revised 3/13/15, 3/18/15 I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide information on the proposed re -development of the West Wing of the Vail Valley Medical Center. Information provided herein has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the Town of Vail development review process. This application has been submitted on behalf of the Vail Valley Medical Center. The West Wing expansion involves just under 45,000sf of new space, the focal point of which is a new fourth floor on this wing of the medical center. As described in the VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP), the West Wing represents the first sequence of construction in the redevelopment and expansion of the campus. The construction sequence for VVMC's expansion and the importance of the West Wing as the first step in this process are outlined in subsequent sections of this report. Two development applications have been submitted: • Development Plan for the construction of new buildings and site improvements, and • Conditional Use Permit for a "health care facility" in the General Use (GU) zone district. Each of these applications and a summary of the proposed redevelopment plans are described in detail below. Information provided in this report is presented in the following sections: I. Introduction II. Overview of VVMC and Project Background III. Project Site Conditions IV. Description of Project V. Conformance with Applicable CUP Review Criteria VI. Appendix In addition to this report, design plans and other material as required for Development Plan and CUP applications has been submitted under separate cover. A site plan of the proposed West Wing expansion is found on the following page. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 2 Conditional Use Permit Application EVERGREEN LODGE y I 'I d� " ro r - wEsr R�Eaoo-wo-Rrv� -- Illustrative site plan of proposed West Wing Expansion VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 3 Conditional Use Permit Application II. OVERVIEW of VVMC and PROJECT BACKGROUND Since its establishment in 1965, Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) has grown into one of the world's most advanced mountain hospitals, providing Olympic -quality sports medicine, leading evidence -based research, modern cancer care and extensive cardiology capabilities. Today, VVMC is comprised of several healthcare campuses located throughout Eagle County and provides healthcare services to both residents and visitors of the Rocky Mountain region of Colorado. VVMC's Vail campus provides an essential service to the Vail community and the surrounding region. While the medical care and services provided by VVMC are outstanding, the hospital's infrastructure is due for modernization. VVMC is at an age and condition where it must be updated to meet the needs of modern medicine and to ensure the facility provides medical staff with the resources necessary to offer the utmost in quality health care. Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan The Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP) provides general direction and a framework for how VVMC will redevelop in the future. It was prepared with extensive input from physicians and staff, neighbors, the community at large, review boards and Town of Vail staff The VVMC MP addresses a multitude of operational, clinical, and technical requirements specific to the campus and it also addresses important neighborhood and community goals. The VVMC MP established expectations for how VVMC's expansion plans will be implemented and this Plan has provided the basis for this development application. When applicable this report describes below how the VVMC MP addresses topics relevant to this development application. Economic Impact of VVMC VVMC has grown into a major economic driver in Vail and Eagle County, helping to diversify and balance an otherwise highly seasonal economy. With more than 850 employees, VVMC is the second largest employer in Eagle County. This consideration alone has a very significant economic impact throughout the community. As documented by two studies, VVMC and its partners who practice at the Vail Campus have a direct economic impact to Vail. A Vail Valley Medical Center Economic Impact Analysis was completed by BBC Research and Consulting in 2009. The direct annual economic impact of VVMC-related spending in Vail was over $5 million, which included retail and restaurant spending by employees, employee -residents, patients and their families. This report identified other notable benefits of VVMC beyond direct economic stimulation. Foremost among these is that the high-quality healthcare being provided by VVMC gives Vail gives and Eagle County a competitive marketing advantage over other mountain communities (particularly with regard to real estate). VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 4 Conditional Use Permit Application In April of 2010, BBC Research and Consulting completed an Economic Impact of The Steadman Clinic and the Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI) on the Town of Vail. Operations of the Clinic and Institute generate over $25 million annually to businesses in the Town of Vail. VVMC, the Steadman Clinic and Institute have a direct economic impact of more than $30 million annually. This is in addition to the annual on-site economic activity at VVMC. The majority of this economic activity is from the large number of "destination patients" drawn to Vail by the Steadman Clinic. In 2009 the Clinic served 10,500 patients. 4,600 of these patients involved surgeries, of which nearly 3,000 were destination patients. On average these patients made three trips to Vail, brought 2.25 people and stayed 4 days, equating to over 80,000 visitor nights in local lodging properties. Spending on lodging, meals and retail from these visitors represent a significant portion of the Town of Vail economic activity generated by The Steadman Clinic and Institute. Implementation of VVMC's Redevelopment and Expansion Plans A major consideration in the design and planning of VVMC expansion plans is to ensure the on-going operation of the hospital during construction. This is the main reason why VVMC expansion will start with construction of the West Wing. Development of the West Wing will create new space to allow for the consolidation and or relocation of a number of existing uses on the campus. Foremost among these users is The Steadman Clinic and SPRI. These organizations are currently located in five different areas throughout the campus and with construction of the West Wing they will be consolidated on the new fourth floor. This and other consolidations will free up existing space in the Central Wing of the campus that can then accommodate existing uses currently located in the East Wing. This re -location is critical to moving forward with the construction of the East Wing. The diagram on the following page depicts the three wings of the campus and the anticipated construction timeframe for the East and West Wings. f 4 Medical Professional Building yC� r ,• . �; ,•ir f1f Rodr­!.. qp• lor,; ll.i-.i, i FI•in VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 5 Conditional Use Permit Application III. PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS WMC is located on three parcels of land that total 4.57 acres. As depicted on the site context drawing below, the West Wing of the hospital is located at the western end of the campus. The site is bordered on the north by South Frontage Road and on the south by West Meadow Drive. Vehicular access to WMC is provided by South Frontage Road and West Meadow Drive. South Frontage Road provides access to an employee parking structure located at the northeast corner of the campus and to the US Bank building. West Meadow Drive provides access to patient and guest parking at the west end of the campus and to loading/service facilities located at the southeast corner of the campus. 9 , ILi WestExpansio Win VV MC Redevelopment Master Plan VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 6 Conditional Use Permit Application IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Below is a summary of the proposed project and detailed discussion of specific elements of the proposed West Wing. The project's conformance with applicable review criteria is found in Section V. of this report. Summary of Proposed Expansion of West Wing West Wing project involves additions to the existing building, site work to the west parking lot, landscape/streetscape enhancement and interim site improvements necessary to service the hospital. The following is a description of proposed improvements. West Wing Building Improvements Major elements of the West Wing expansion include the following: • A new fourth level that will provide space for The Steadman Clinic and Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI). This space will allow these two organizations to consolidate their operations which are currently dispersed throughout the campus in multiple locations. • Third level expansion will enhance the existing Surgical Suites area of the hospital. The focal point of this expansion is to increase pre-op and recovery areas, to expand staff support space, and to relocate and expand the Sterile Processing Department. • The focal point of the Second Level expansion is to allow for the conversion of a number of double -bed patient rooms to single rooms. • First Level expansion will create expanded lobby and circulation spaces, expand Howard Head Sports Medicine, and provide space for SPRI. In addition to the new square footage outlined above, much of the West Wing will be renovated and re -purposed as a part of this project. Expansion to the West Wing will provided new and renovated space that is critical to providing quality patient care. As mentioned above, another important consideration, or result, of this new West Wing expansion is that it will provide space for the relocation of existing uses in the Central and East Wings (that will then allow for the demolition and reconstruction of the East Wing). West Wing Site Improvements Site improvements associated with the West Wing expansion include the following: • A portion of the existing parking lot is redesigned and re -graded. Re -grading is necessary due to changes to the entry to the West Wing and to conform to ADA standards. • Redesign/re-grading of the entry drive off of West Meadow Drive. • Installation of curb along west side of lot to direct run-off away from Middle Creek and to better demarcate parking areas. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 7 Conditional Use Permit Application • Installation of storm water quality improvements (oil/sand separator, curb) and restoration of the east bank of the Middle Creek corridor adjacent the West Lot. • Relocation of the liquid oxygen storage tank (from West Meadow Drive to the north side of parking lot). • New surface loading area on north side of West Wing (for larger trucks, mobile imaging truck, etc.). • Redesign of the portion of parking lot located on adjoining Lot 10 (owned by Town of Vail). Temporary Generator Location The West Wing will necessitate the re -location of a generator that is currently located in the basement of the West Wing. The generator will temporarily be located immediately north of the West Wing. Upon completion of the East Wing the generator will be moved to its permanent location in the new Central Plant. Parking Lot Improvements While a final parking lot design is provided with this CUP application, a number of factors may necessitate changes to this plan. Foremost among are how the potential land exchange with the Evergreen Lodge and the future status of Lot 10 could affect parking lot design. It is assumed that proposed parking lot improvements will not be constructed until the end of the West Wing expansion, roughly the fall of 2016. If events unfold such that changes to the parking lot design are necessary VVMC will return to the PEC to present amendments to final parking lot improvements. Building_DesignDesign The design of the West Wing has been done in response to the design guidelines and considerations outlined in the VVMC MP. Materials and detailing from the existing Central Wing/Women's Center have influenced materials on the West Wing. Building off -sets, stepbacks and building materials have been used to articulate the building to minimize its mass along West Meadow Drive. Landscape and streetscape treatments have also been used to soften the buildings relationship to West Meadow Drive. Renderings of the West Wing are found on the following page. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 8 Conditional Use Permit Application The use of stone on the West Wing complements the existing Central Wing and serves to unify the project design. Articulation of the south fagade reduces the perceived scale of the building. Landscape Design Landscape and streetscape improvement plans have been submitted. Major elements of these plans include: • Restoration of the ground surface immediately west of the West Lot and east of Middle Creek. • Landscape islands within the redesigned parking lot. • Plant materials along West Meadow Drive to "soften" the visual impact of the building and to add color and interest along the street. • Outdoor dining patio along West Meadow Drive. • Use of a heat -melt system on the walkway/ramp that connects the West Wing entry with the Town's sidewalk along West Meadow Drive. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 9 Conditional Use Permit Application Conceptual plan for streetscape and landscape improvements along West Meadow Drive. The walkway from the Town's sidewalk to the West Wing entry will be heated. More specific information and analysis of improvements proposed to the West Wing is provided below for: Zoning/Development Standards Building Expansion/Re-organization of Uses and Square Footage Parking Traffic Employee Housing Zoning/Development Standards In the GU District the following development standards are to be proposed by the applicant and "prescribed by the PEC" as a part of the review of the CUP. The following summarizes proposed development standards relative to the West Wing. Development standards for site coverage, landscaping and setbacks have been calculated based on the land area of the portion of the VVMC campus zoned General Use. Lot Area and Site Dimensions The VVMC campus is located on four parcels of land that comprise +/-4.57 acres. For the purposes of this CUP application, only the land area of Lots E and F, Vail Village Filing 2 (the main campus that is zoned GU, and exclusive of the US Bank parcel and the small parcel of land recently purchased from the Evergreen Lodge) is included in defining development standards. The land area addressed by this CUP is 3.8 acres, or 166,269sf. A survey of the subject parcel has been provided under separate cover. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 10 Conditional Use Permit Application Setbacks Proposed setbacks for the West Wing are as follows: Front (along West Meadow Drive) Proposed — varies from 3.5' to 33' Side (to the west property line w/Lot 10) — Proposed — varies from 23' to 45' Rear (to the north property line) Proposed —varies from 105' to 121' Building Height The proposed roof of the West Wing is at elevation 8,205'. While the grade along Meadow Drive varies, the average grade along the south elevation is +/-8145, meaning the West Wing is +/-60 in height. Building heights are depicted on elevations and other drawings provided in the design package that has been submitted under separate cover. Density Control N/A Landscape Proposed landscape area is 25,115sf, or 15.1 % of the total site area. Existing landscape area is 22,362sf, or 13.4%. Site Coverage Proposed site coverage is 85,OOOsf, or 51.1% of the total site area. Existing site coverage is 78,539sf, or 47.2%. Parking and Loading Parking demand from the West Wing expansion, how proposed parking is addressing this demand, parking management, truck access and snow storage is address in subsequent sections of this report. Plans and diagrams depicting site coverage, setbacks, and landscape area have been provided under separate cover. Building Expansion/Re-Organization of Uses and Square Footage The West Wing expansion will trigger a significant amount of re -organization and re- location of uses with VVMC. Below is a comparison of existing square footage and uses to proposed square footage and uses. The purpose of this analysis is to provide an VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 11 Conditional Use Permit Application understanding of the net new increase in square footage from the West Wing expansion and specifically how this will affect parking requirements (note that a similar analysis of how expansion will impact new employee generation is provided in the VVMC Employee Housing Plan that is provided under separate cover). Floor plans depicting existing and proposed uses, square footages, and other changes to the West Wing are found at the end of this report. Basement Level Existing uses in the basement level include the hospital cafeteria, back of the house functions (computer room, mechanical spaces, etc.) and a small office used by the Facilities Department. A relatively minor expansion to the basement level is proposed. Net square footage increases from 4,754sf to 7,484sf. Minor changes will be made to the cafeteria and back of house uses. The Facility Department office will be removed and +/-3,230sf of meeting room space will be created. This space will replace +/-1,900 sf of existing meeting room space that is currently located in the East Wing. In summary, changes to the basement level will have no impact on parking or other CUP review process considerations. Level 1 The two major uses currently located on the Level Tare Colorado Mountain Medical (CMM) and Howard Head Sports Medicine (HHSM). Other uses include the retail pharmacy, gift shop, an MRI room and the main lobby. A portion of the West Wing south facade will be expanded and the main entry to the building will be expanded to the west and north. Net square footage on Level 1 increases from 11,171 sf to 17,279sf. The southern expansion will provide additional space for HHSM (but more importantly provide a building footprint for expanded space for the Patient Care area on the second floor and for the Surgical Suites on the third floor). HHSM increases in size by 3,300sf, but this square footage will result in only two additional patient treatment areas and two additional employees. The majority of the new square footage for HHSM will provide for larger patient treatment areas and exercise/performance areas for patients and for expanded staff support space. CMM will be relocated to the US Bank Building and reduced in size from 16 exam rooms to 8 exam rooms. SPRI will be re -located in this space (and space of the new fourth floor) and occupy 5,700sf on Level 1. Minor expansions will be made to the pharmacy and the gift shop. In summary, the expansion to HHSM will result in a modest increase to parking demand as will the SPRI expansion. The re -location of CCM will result in a reduction in West Wing parking demand. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 12 Conditional Use Permit Application Level 2 While Patient Care (hospital beds) and Intensive care will remain the primary uses on the second floor, a new Cardiac Catheterization Lab (Cath Lab) is currently under construction on Level 2. The Cath Lab necessitated the re -location of four ICU beds, which in turn displaced four patient beds. These four beds will not be replaced, resulting in a total reduction of VVMC beds from 58 to 54. Net square footage on Level 2 increases from 16,349sf to 18,836sf. Expanded floor area is primarily a function of the building expansion to the south side of. Expansion in this specific area is necessary due to the existing layout and functions on the patient care unit. West Wing will add a total of 2,487 square feet to Level 2. Of this additional square footage, 1,630 square feet is dedicated to the new Cath Lab. The balance of new square footage will provide space to enhance other aspects of patient care. In summary, the Cath Lab will have a modest increase to parking requirements. This increase, however, this is off -set by the removal of four hospital beds. Level 3 Surgical Suites (including four operating rooms and associated pre-op and post-op areas) and the Steadman Clinic are the two existing uses on Level 3. The Steadman Clinic space will be re -located to the new fourth floor and upon completion of the West Wing the entire third floor will be devoted to the Surgery Suites and the directly related use of Sterile Processing. Square footage devoted to the Surgery Suites nearly doubles in size. Total square footage on Level 3 increases from 16,344sf to 21,780sf, an increase of 5,436sf. While there is no increase in the number of operating rooms, space devoted to pre-op, post-op and support spaces increases significantly. Sterile Processing is currently located in the East Wing. While the new Sterile Processing area will increase in size, there will be no increases in the number of employees. In summary, while there will be an increase is square footage to the Surgical Suites the number of operating rooms is unchanged and no increase in patient capacity will result. As such there is no new parking demand on Level 3. Level 4 Level 4 will provide 24,443sf of new space for the Steadman Clinic and SPRI. SPRI will occupy approximately 7,278sf on Level 4 and when added to their 5,700sf on Level 1 SPRI will have 13,050sf of space in the West Wing. After vacating their existing offices in the Central and East Wings SPRI will have a net gain of 4,222sf. The new Steadman Clinic space totals 17,165sf. After vacating 8,401sf of existing space in the West and Central Wings, the Clinic will have a net gain of 8,764sf. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 13 Conditional Use Permit Application In summary, expansions to SPRI and the Steadman Clinic will both result in increased parking demand generated by increased number of employees and in the case of the Clinic from an increase to patient exam rooms. Parking and Circulation The following section addresses parking requirements from the West Wing expansion, parking lot design, parking solution, changes to how parking will be managed, truck access, and snow storage. Parking Requirements for West Wing Expansion Parking demand for the West Wing was calculated using the "employee based" parking formula outlined in the WMP MP. This formula is: space per patient bed space per exam room space per day shift employee Based on this formula the parking requirement for the West Wing is: Level B — no new parking demand Level 1 — 2 new exam rooms/patient tables at HHSM 2 new employees at HHSM 4 total parking spaces (parking demand from SPRI addressed in Level 4) Level 2 - 2 new exam rooms at Cath Lab 3 new employees at Cath Lab 5 total parking spaces Level 3 - no new parking demand Level 4 - 6 new employees at SPRI 13 new exam rooms at Steadman Clinic 25 new employees at Steadman Clinic 44 total parking spaces The total parking demand from the expansion of the West Wing is 53 spaces. The relocation of CMM to the US Bank Building and their reduction from 16 exam rooms to 8 exam rooms results in a reduction of 8 parking spaces. The removal of four patient beds on Level 2 results in a reduction of 4 parking spaces. The net parking requirement for the West Wing is 41 spaces. Proposed Parking Lot Design The west parking lot has been redesigned due to ADA considerations related to the West Wing expansion. The most significant aspect of this redesign is the re -grading of VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 14 Conditional Use Permit Application portions of the lot and the access drive from West Meadow Drive. Other features of the redesigned lot include: • New access to the Town's 16 parking space on Lot 10 • Increased interior landscaping consistent with the Town's standards (10.9%) • 10 handicapped parking spaces • Provisions for access by large trucks (discussed below) • Water Quality measures to improve the parking lots relationship to Middle Creek (discussed below) The redesign of the lot resulted in a new reduction of parking spaces. The proposed lot provides 84 VVMC spaces. With the valet program to be operated by VVMC an additional 13 spaces will be created, resulting in a total of 97 spaces. Currently 112 spaces are in the West Lot, meaning a net loss of 15 spaces from what currently exists. The Parking Solution The West Wing expansion creates a new demand of 41 parking spaces and the reduction of 15 spaces means total of 56 parking spaces are needed. These spaces will be provided on-site when the East Wing is constructed. Until the time East Wing parking is available VVMC will lease 56 off-site spaces. Leases for the 15 "lost spaces" will be in place prior to issuance of a building permit for the West Wing. Leases for the 41 new spaces for the West Wing expansion will be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the West Wing. Changes to Parking Lot Management Currently 106 of the 112 spaces in the West Lot are used by patients and guests. The East Parking Structure is used exclusively by employees. Changes in parking management will shift patient/guest parking to the East Lot and the 97 spaces in the West Lot will be used by employees. This change will take effect during the early phases of West Wing construction. This parking change will accomplish two things — Patients and guest will be able to access VVMC without having to interface with West Wing Construction, and The changing in parking will dramatically reduce the VVMC-generated traffic on West Meadow Drive. The reduction in daily trips on West Meadow Drive will be from approximately 1,325 trips during peak days to approximately 275 trips. Moving patient/guest parking to the East Structure will require a comprehensive program to inform VVMC patients and guests of this change. This program will involve outreach and education for VVMC patients and guests, on-site greeters/concierge service at the entry to the East Structure and improved way -finding within the Campus and directional signs on surrounding roadways. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 15 Conditional Use Permit Application As described below, improvements to the South Frontage Road will be necessary in order to accommodate increased traffic volume at the entry to the East Structure. Plans for implementing these improvements are discussed below. Truck Access A new, enclosed loading and delivery facility will be constructed as an element of the East Wing. Until that time loading for the West Wing will be handled in the existing loading facility. The loading and delivery plan for VVMC involves accommodating large trucks in the West Lot. The truck/delivery survey done during the summer of 2015 indicates that on average once each day a truck larger than a SU30 services VVMC. These "larger" trucks will be accommodated in the West Lot. WB40 sized trucks can be accommodated in a dedicated truck bay located immediately north of the West Wing. This size truck covers most of the larger truck deliveries. The liquid oxygen tank to the West Lot. The tank has been located to allow turning movements for this WB40 truck to service the tank. The truck will for a brief period of time obstruct a handful of parking spaces. This truck delivers on average once every two weeks, more frequently when surgery caseloads are high. Deliveries can be scheduled and require less than one hour of time. On the rare occasion that a WB62 truck delivers to VVMC it can be accommodated in the West Lot. The truck will obstruct a handful of parking spaces, however given the extremely limited frequency of this sized truck servicing the hospital, this is not considered to be an issue. Truck turning studies demonstrating how WB40 and WB62 trucks can maneuver in the West Lot have been provided under separate cover. Snow Storage Town codes require snow storage areas equal to 30% of the parking lot area. Snow storage is typically provided within interior landscape islands and on the perimeter of parking areas. Usable areas for snow storage at VVMC are very limited. Areas to the west of the parking lot will not be used in order to not plow snow into Middle Creek. While there is land area north of the parking lot, this area is not viable due to a retaining wall that runs the length of the parking lot. Areas to the south of the lot are too close to Meadow Drive and the hospital itself defines the eastern edge of the parking lot. The snow storage plan for VVMC utilizes interior landscape islands and parking spaces along the north side of the lot. These areas represent 18% of the parking lot area. The snow storage plan will entail storing snow along the northern row of parking stalls and throughout the winter when necessary trucking snow from the parking lot. 18 spaces are VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 16 Conditional Use Permit Application labeled "snow storage". However, it is unlikely that all 18 spaces will be used for snow storage except for during extreme snow cycles. Hauling snow as necessary will be done to ensure a minimal number of parking spaces are used for snow storage at any given time. r`a Snow Storage th'P-) i tiflllll' STn I'a:; t' tiU111171�1 [-�' 1'V NK—: 1\ ct4 Wing C L F Parking Lot Zoning r�nall i Snow Storagr Immediate Parking Lot/Water Quality Measures Page 8 of this report describes how parking lot improvements, including steps to improve water quality and the relationship of the parking lot with Middle Creek will not be implemented until the end of West Wing construction (late 2016). Three immediate steps will be taken to address this issue: • Installation of a low-level fence or barrier to define the parking lot and to prevent snow from being deposited into the creek corridor, • Restoration of the ground surface on the east bank of Middle Creek, and • Improved snow management practices. Traffic A traffic report summarizing the traffic impacts of the West Wing has been completed by Turnkey Consulting LLC. A copy of this report is found in the appendix. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 17 Conditional Use Permit Application As described above, VVMC is changing their management of parking by shifting employee parking to the West Lot and patient/guest parking to the East Structure. The focus of the traffic report was to address the traffic implications of this change to how parking is managed. The change in parking management will have a significant impact on West Meadow Drive by dramatically reducing the VVMC-generated traffic. Daily, peak period VVMC- generated traffic on West Meadow Drive is expected to reduce from approximately 1,325 trips per day to approximately 275 trips per day. This is a function of two factors — the re -design of the West Lot has reduced its capacity (from 112 to 97) and more significantly the employees who will park in this lot generate 2 trips per space while existing patient/guest parking generates approximately 12 trips per space 9 (a function of them turning over 6 times per day). The other aspect of this change to parking is how the increased traffic volumes at the existing entry to the East Structure will be accommodated. Two South Frontage Road traffic scenarios were evaluated — Peak winter conditions based on holiday season traffic counts from 2006 (forecasted to 2015) and a summer condition using counts from 2013 (forecasted to 2015). This analysis concludes that in summer conditions the existing access improvements to the East Structure would provide acceptable traffic operations. Further, that during peak winter traffic conditions the interim Frontage Road improvements (described in the VVMC MP) will be necessary in order to provide acceptable traffic operations. A conceptual plan of this improvement is below. + +"' 4 114, � M x j * ✓M d 0 n existing East Entry ]� Shaded area indicates 1 extant of road work Aa� New VVMC _ Entry k �L a Interim South Frontage Road access improvements (from VVMC MP) VVMC West Wing Expansion Conditional Use Permit Application Relocated "FOV Eptry —Right out only from US Bank VVMC Interii-n Access Conce-ptUal Plan Page 18 Based on this traffic analysis, VVMC proposes to implement changes to parking management concurrent with initiating construction of the West Wing. Over the course of the summer VVMC will finalize the design of the interim Frontage Road improvements and obtain necessary permits from CDOT. These interim improvements will be constructed this fall and be in place prior to winter. Employee Housing The West Wing expansion will require employee housing mitigation in accordance with the Town's Commercial Linkage ordinance. As per section 12-23-4, employee housing mitigation requirements for a re -development project are based on new employee generation resulting from the net increase in floor area of the project. Employee generation resulting from increased square footage is based on generation rates prescribed for specific land uses on Table 23-1 of the Code. The table does not, however, include a generation rate for hospitals, clinics or medical facilities. While the ordinance states that an applicant can submit competent evidence that the employee generation rates contained in Table 23-1do not reflect the number of employees generated by the proposed development, the code does not specifically outline procedures for determining employee generation for land uses not listed on Table 23-1. As required by Chapter 23, an Employee Housing Plan for the West Wing expansion has been prepared and has been provided under separate cover. This plan includes an explanation of the methodology used to determine employee generation, employee generation from the West Wing and the mitigation method to be used by VVMC to meet the requirements of Chapter 23. This plan is under review by Town Staff and will be presented to the PEC for their review at a later date. Methodology to Calculate Employee Generation A wide variety of uses are found within a medical center and the intensity or number of employees for each use also varies considerably. For example, on a "per square foot basis" the number of employees needed to support food service, pharmacy, emergency department, imaging, medical clinics, administration and research functions vary significantly. As such it would be impractical to define a single ratio (i.e. X employees per 1,000 square feet), as is done for other land uses in Table 23-1. In lieu of researching square footage and employee data for multiple medical centers in order to determine a standard generation rate, a more site specific approach has been taken to defining employee generation for VVMC. This approach was taken for two reasons — evaluating existing conditions at VVMC will be a more accurate indication of employee conditions (than relying on data from other medical centers) and it is likely that VVMC will remain the only medical center use in Vail and as such establishing employee generation ratios to use for other development projects is not necessary. Basing employee generation on actual conditions at the Vail campus is the most accurate approach to understanding future conditions. The Employee Housing Report includes the following: VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 19 Conditional Use Permit Application • Summary of two underlying factors relative to the expansion of VVMC that will influence employee generation, • Baseline inventory of existing uses, square footage of space employees for all VVMC departments and all other organizations that operate at the campus, • Inventory changes/increases to square footage for each department and organization listed above, • Evaluation of specific expansion (and/or contraction or relocation) plans for each department and organization within the West Wing and how these plans impact employee generation, and • Summary of required employee mitigation and how mitigation will be provided for the West Wing expansion. On-site Housing Requirements The VVMC MP addresses employee housing and while specific numbers on new employees to be generated by the project were not provided, the VVMC MP did conclude that employee requirements are to be mitigated with off-site housing. Off-site housing is to be provided for two reasons. Residential uses were deemed to not be compatible with the institutional use of the medical center and it was determined that given the limited site area of the campus the best utilization of this land is for medical uses (and not residential uses). Section 12-23-6 of Chapter 23 stipulates that in cases where employee generation exceeds 1.25 employees, 50% of required mitigation must be provided on-site, provided however that at the sole discretion of the applicable governing body, "an exception may be granted based upon one of the following findings". Based on the response to findings below, a request for an exception to the on-site requirement is proposed. a. Implementation of the on-site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the intent and purpose of the applicable zone district. Response N/A b. Implementation of the on-site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the goals of the applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan and the town's development objectives. Response A waiver to the on-site requirement is consistent with the VVMC Master Plan. This plan states that 'for two reasons all required employee housing will be provided off-site. " These reasons include: • VVMC is an intensive, institutional land use. Introducing a residential land use on the site would not be compatible with the primary purpose of the site, which is to accommodate a hospital and relate medical uses. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 20 Conditional Use Permit Application VVMC has very limited land area. The primary purpose of this site is to accommodate the medical center's existing needs as well as to retain opportunities for future expansion to the medical center. Introducing residential land use would conflict with the intended use of the site, limit future expansion opportunities and not be consistent with the town's comprehensive plan. c. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions apply to the site that prevents the implementation of the on-site unit mitigation method. Response VVMC is a unique land use and an "extraordinary circumstance ". With VVMC's limited land area, introducing housing to the site would compete with the need to accommodate medical uses (now and in the future) and in doing so conflict with the Town's goal for this site to be used for medical purposes. In essence, any portion of the site that was to be used for housing would result in less site area available for future medical uses. This situation is exacerbated by existing covenant restrictions that limit VVMC's future expansion potential. d. The method of mitigation proposed better achieves the intent and purpose of this chapter and general and specific purposes of this title than the on-site mitigation unit method. Response Addressing employee impacts with off-site mitigation provides a more workable solution for addressing not only the goals of the housing regulations, but also the town's master plan goals for VVMC. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 21 Conditional Use Permit Application V. CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The same review criteria are used to review CUP and Development Plan applications. Below is a summary of how the proposed West Wing expansion conforms to these criteria. A summary of how the West Wing conforms to the VVMC MP follows. (1) Describe the precise nature of the proposed use and measures proposed to make the use compatible with other properties in the vicinity. Response The precise nature of the proposed use is described in Section IV. above. VVMC has been in place for 50 years and over this time compatibility of the hospital use with the surrounding residential and mixed use neighborhood has been established. There are no changes in uses proposed by this CUP that would adversely affect VVMC's compatibility with other properties in the vicinity. The design of the building expansion has been done in response to guidelines and parameters outlined in the Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP)that are intended to ensure building design that is responsive to the surrounding area. The proposal will result in a significant reduction of VVMC-generated traffic from West Meadow Drive, improving VVMC's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. (2) The relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. Response The West Wing expansion proposed by this CUP application represents the initial step in a +$100,000,000 expansion to the medical center. These expansion plans are outlined in the VVMC MP, a master plan that has been determined to be consistent with the Town's development objectives. The proposed use will result in many upgrades to the medical center that will provide a facility to allow for the upmost in quality health care to the Vail community and surrounding area. These improvements will also reinforce VVMC's ability to expand medical services or offer new services in the future and in doing so continue to provide quality health care to the community and to continue to provide significant economic benefits to the Town of Vail. (3) The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facility needs. Response The proposed use will not affect any of the considerations outlined above. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 22 Conditional Use Permit Application (4) The effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking area. Response As outlined above, changes to parking management will result in a dramatic reduction of VVMC-generated traffic on West Meadow Drive. Improvements to the South Frontage Road will be made to ensure appropriate traffic flow at the entry to the East Structure. (5) The effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Response The VVMC MP includes a goal statement specific to the massing of the proposed expansion of the Medical Center. Specifically, a goal of the Master Plan is for "the massing (and scale) of the hospital expansion to be responsive and sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood". The Master Plan, while acknowledging that an additional floor will be added to the West Wing, provides guidelines and parameters for achieving this goal. In response to these guidelines the proposed design utilizes varied wall plans, building stepbacks and articulation, and building materials to minimize the scale and bulk of the building. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 23 Conditional Use Permit Application VL APPENDIX West Wing Floor Plan Comparisons Construction Sequence Traffic Impact & Mitigation (Parking Swap) VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 24 Conditional Use Permit Application 4- w VVMC West Wing Expansion Conditional Use Permit Application Page 25 I -4 4-j Cr W 4 Y - u_. _..... y � _... _. _._... .-. _._..--. ... O .L (J co m a W �w N F � n 4 7o Th —L _ e liiili e _ LI I I,I NN��M a n v 0 .L a W e�'by N F = x 7o Th _ e W K 3 Ilk m i — w 0zm fjOw cars? NN��M a a ' n v 0 .L a W e�'by N F = x 7o a ' v w rs a4A �GG 205 N F VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 26 Conditional Use Permit Application AN'we, ii U LI u F u 0. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 27 Conditional Use Permit Application .� X W .. «, �\j� ,\ 1r \ ) \) ) §E \ . \ ) (!ƒ ! �( «`. «f :»e §/ )= i | \c { \ ) \) ) §E \ 7 ; )3 ) (!ƒ § | \c { \ \) ) §E ± I vNEWest Wing Expansion X728 Conditional Use Permit Application A- VVMC West Wing Expansion Conditional Use Permit Application N n "s 8 z x I tJ CA I u Page 29 F- = o �> �lo �o W - LU W Y > a IL N W (�? w>>N LO O 5� � O a� a m �oo N m ro Oo J N Q A �� U(00 �'(0O �O z N = F N Wc J � y N rn = 0 2 F— O N C 'O � U N W O a E. 0 0 O co O M z 0 wo = o �> �lo �o W - Y > a U O m N > (�? w>>N O 5� ..N� No Qom ro O a� a m �oo N m ro Oo my o �U /100 LL� UAO -O W M> Z Z O, a CD d' I O N A �� U(00 �'(0O �O a NJ �O r U U N M 3 Of 2 = F N Wc J � y N rn = 0 W O r 0 0 - U M (n O M J �N♦� A O G 0, v Oj J (j O N C 'O � U N W O a E. 0 0 O co O M a z w ~w off= s aaaaaa�- - N o99 - g -- z 0 F— L) 'H V/ z 0 0 LL H Z CH G W IL 'W vI J z 0 F- 5 5 z 0 w LU F— z LU U J Q U a W W J J � = o �> �lo �o W - 0- 0. Om , N W r n (�? O 5� N N� Z Wm9o(nN YY pW `O O U zU m UO oO op; d'NO rnNW�O Wan0 (5wC, �wo C ), app O Q°i a z w ~w off= s aaaaaa�- - N o99 - g -- z 0 F— L) 'H V/ z 0 0 LL H Z CH G W IL 'W vI J z 0 F- 5 5 z 0 w LU F— z LU U J Q U a W W J J z C) 0 Ol Ll ui N W < > 0 a of ------------- < < o do < w z o ID Z - °e z o a z� �Z M O� - 7ZF U oa �m 'o3�- W �a. Otwn FOS a x U d o E s e _ U° Q W® i I I , ,I I I I I I � lw z ' Z z < ol 7 w z zo W. 2 o > >LUO ¢¢ o az o� k a ¢c0 LUr 05=LUol 00 fo W U o z ® = m >U F y o F a Q O 3� O. m a 2 i� U _� 0 3 8 3 .1 -ED$a F LU Z 0 o Z •V e Qm F '. ¢O Owm w O O r LU _ A I � � O O O O O OA / oN � Z O 0 ,w 0 Z O O o U w � IE JV O LL 1777 w d� ® �� ❑ El w Y El+ L Z L: Eal r X ----------------------------------------------------- ----- ------------ ---- 13 ---o q y i El D D i i i i M---------------------------------H--------------------- a I e e < I �m I w I O I w o. Lu ED yZ0 t�a Q ww JJ Z o Zt k E� >U as Foa QO> d> N _ QJ 00 LU Z O O o U w � IE JV O LL 1777 w d� ® �� ❑ El w Y El+ L Z L: Eal r X ----------------------------------------------------- ----- ------------ ---- 13 ---o q y i El D D i i i i M---------------------------------H--------------------- a I e e < I �m I w I O I w o. EDLU�. . U \ j z §\) ( dd\ QF-§) § ;` !! >§§ G \ -,§ _ , 2 - O F- U e : _ a ® m El : 2 2 § O u /o F- F- _ O 0 ° 0 _ a ®e = e ! » El ' ---d..2------- z --«- ---- —d— : \ : \ ƒ § Z } \ � %§ \ � G g g Z : z !�! }) _ -_ - _/ ( . \ _ k§ 2 « y {\ \\ ( \!` cr -� LU to Z $ f Q ? W J z o ¢¢ o az >U F 0 zt o. k ¢ a LL LO O T e= > 0 3� o3g , 0. a crQ m w Ea N �a a = O �9F0 Z Z F a: O Jw o ® I w w a 2 aw o i� Nw Ea U_ z Z O �9F0 Z Z F a: O o-� Na I w w z O l�lL/ .. o ��1E ° �T 1� Ili i/i O o 0 F— inqI�« Uo° O a` z O H ------------- �E _.I�'J�A w o 6t Ell EE U� Uv 0 w_ ]MIPll frl r— M°� 8 H0 N meJ#tfl o o m o �m En 9e ee 8 ❑ ❑ z ao0 0 oa w w z R �� �� N e o o e o o I� Im n H Hw �w �I w'In d -- �Ir1r �I�aIn w w �� si z O Ea m j oo W Uv, a >W p o g� k� U5 Qa o J� va of O ZZo o�< 0<v N o -o o a p o -o a U s a 2 > ° �> ❑ 9 0U o 0 0 O IQ w w o €� z O O U ❑ o 0 0 O ❑ o LL ❑ 8=- O yew o 0 0 � z oo e � w� e e d� ETAg _ o w I e e �o _w e e e o� ❑ v HF e ElElIEEIe r m= o El -,m } e p p. �I I �w a 0 Z O w 2 a 0 N 0 Z e � e W O o z JJZ o 9 Zt E _ o Q Q O $ ss a 2 02 - N > U F g y p F & m Q w O 3� � W� O� Eh $a d Z m r 0= H U- a� Z O H U- o � N :. Z O U w w0 O L_________ LL` r O Z a a 0 o � a � o =O H U K H O U O a a L Ro. LU v Lu - _ yl.: < z a U 0 cn H WOLF I � I r I I J Q s p i a l I yid€ I I E a II I a U N O r cn H m s a = Nw Ea v I w z b? a L�t5 w a�> rc r r LU r r g m m m A H c ag — 4a �5' Wag Wag r w - - MU�w MO 1 V i LU Qa uj ° �T i U Kim _ J — -- —_-o _ q�'�wc O Z J Q W aE Q �� — —€A m�o w a H m s a I w z b? a w a�> rc r r . r r g m m m A H c ag — 4a �5' Wag Wag W_ HP H MU�w MO 1 H o LU a I 9 z b? a . w /7 I H 1 H o LU uj �T i U � � y� • M, � .Irc 4• MMI mm1r■ l� y� • M, � .Irc 4• C� C) C� U CA rl .r4 4—J CJ] • rl W / {9, i ;Ili CIO 114 u Cf i ;Ili t Iri V f rl , I ,-c ,-c tn NO Ll 9 Cc, CA IN, 9-4 NO rz Ll 9 Cc, CA IN, el I 9-4 NO el I z w W O a w z j M lJ I1 I Ira N M d -t Ln H a � a U) v �� N v ett O W � v � T U x v Hod�Hx � U7 v U 41 j v � uCZ) Q U w u> w41-1 W r ON r- N N ON N N N cn cn j M lJ I1 I Ira N M d -t Ln H r-� Aw a � a � v O v ett O W v T U x v Hod�Hx � r-� Aw r-1 L O > N +, L Q) +, nA V >, Q C6 0 O v L C6 § O VI N v Q Q Q > v co aJ LJ LO +v, > v O Co Q) i n°A U aj C C a �O O � CLOd 0 C � f6 C +�, U v N U � aJ >(U aJ O L E QJ '�, o L } a) of o > O co C6 v G L -0 O >10 + o > 0 3 •� aJ + O a0 o U16 aj`� 3 � o a, v f6 +cn O O QJ J -I- ai .N �, m aj 0 +, 3 ,Q .� N aj aJ .� U _,- L v (6 L aJ ai C co co U 0 Q > +� L L L N 4- co O 4- M� QJ ; Q_ >, N U U L >� cp LO v �Q + c Q O O M +.j 0 N N E w m v m Q> o ro v ,U �^ 3 0� 'Q L O v v a, v — Q- N Co } nvA .v u O E N c v °U O Q n°p } 'N � Q v v aJ L O O E � 2 v� c6 c�/I ai O aJ E •=� O aj U aJ Y + N c0 qA Q V ai o v ^ — O O C6 CL p N aJ L> v O Qv � Q ai v UO_ :.6> v co ( L �O C6 > c C6 aJ +J O 4- W-0 •> O L") v c -N •v � N Q Q +� a co = n3 ai +, +, > a> n Q ocm m° Q Ln v L ° ai v O Q u Q > QJ - ai L °n 0 +1 Lo :2 v X v— L N O � O ai � > c+'n N � bA C6 > X C6 aJ aj 'N L c) aJ C6 C6 `� N U > aJ O E aJ L Q> O v Q Q O U C Q aJ •� Q L -6v a -• O aj H + co X +� aJ cn aC d Q aj -0 bA > U N > N v C> v Q Q E d> L > co V1 ai +J a O � aj 0 C � f6 C +�, U L v U -0 aj aJ a-• C6 N a� E QJ '�, t6 +' o U aj of > > O ai w v G L -0 Caj aJ aJ + O a0 U16 aj`� f6 iJ U C: vaj 'n aj m � �, O aj 0 +, 3 ,Q .� N aj a, 0 .� o aj L L > +J O 4- M� QJ ; U U L >� cp > o o ro Q+ aj q +' v nA m E u v In COL C: v CE c 'N � E > n— U 4- CO 2 v� c6 CO X� a) E aj t6 E V N ^ (6 O l�0 p p N i v N aj N Q v bz v `� Q E 4- 4- W-0 O L") aJ •v � � Q +� a co = n3 ai +, +, > aj Q U Q Ln v L Q aJ ° u E - ai L °n 'r N v v— L — a--� > > __ •U L N Q aj m Q V1 O U `� aJ O U i a -•i aJ Q> O v Q Q U Q O� �+ •� .� NV1 UnA N -0 O, O QC6 aj aJ W N .i vQ N c Q E +, + Q M U O +J 0_70 v > + aj t�A Q v 0 N O ai o Q v v v t6 C6 O aj 0 ai u in � � v v Co E � +O � > �+'- -+'--,v 0 v 0 'a 0 v C Z3 c 0 13 0 v c 0 v P 0 'a FQ r-1 L Q) L N O v v N v Q) O — - EE to v 3 Q E v N v E 3 v a v Oo • N Q > + v > J v o N v 0 v> p Q N O v o L > QL Q) o o- x 4- v O C6 Q E Lr� i Q s= C: > 4- o o cn N v O N N ,° N d 4-> L O QJ c C O QJ Q +- L v `0 v —_ (6 (�6 Q Co •�, § -a � 5 E U .v L x v � Q) cn aJ >j = (6 O N -0 C v v in `� v� N— E '� � `^ N E 0 mv `~ O N ca Q) -0 o� m o L Q� v v 0 c > m zH Q L vO Q' L a (6 LU v o 72 p v Q E > U v Y N vi v O v avc p v v— v =_ a� �.N 3 �Q 0 L O Q) .N CL Q) 4- 0 2 N a Q) 4- O Q) CLO C6 Co U L o 0 CLO0 *.Fl s= Q) v � CL Q) O rl N M w Q) LL c O Q) v Q Q) ul c i2 CL S. - Q) Q) c� G Q) Q) O CLO Q) t6 O Q) ul � 0 -0 O} O L v O QJ o QJ QJ Q (6 M Q Q CL 0 aJ (L6 } Q C aJ (6 QJ N Lo U O 4.1 Q N '� v v aJ N U Q nOA Q N c6 c to s= NO '�> c N V O v aJ aJ > EaJ aJ N L d aJ > aJ Q >� -0O Q cr O N aJ — N> v O N c CL c�i, C,A N OL N O O *' > L O N +� (6 N 'N Q d j +, +�, 00 Q aJ L VI U aJ VI U QJ aJ N Vf N aJ m CLO � a aJ 'L C6 i6 QJ > N N L N c c >, N U Q U L +' C6 L N C6 C6 to aJ .° `-^ O aJ C,A > O C6 L v t= OCLO > L VI LL N to U N > t= aJ +' O E O Q 3Lo ' s= i v O C� c, �Lo � Q Q O Q +- v C= Q v N Q� v — v> E 3 v 4- -0 w > 3 °+ v o� a Q p 4- .- O C: > � v — s= +, a v o a, E � �, — x v x a, v>-0 a) > v N m v a) +, +, u v Q)-0 aj 0 v �, Q .v v O o m.- v Q 'o N o v m o .- `" v m-0 o O CLO m to � O > -0 � > a N aJ L +� Q L t= d t= ?> s= o Q � s= ,n v v aJ aJ QL •N° -0 Q E OQ A O— = N O ° P M m v U C:-0 ra-0 F N v v N v QJ +1 i6 >. a--� L C6 QJ L > cl O N N lu Q- W +� UA N Q p ° +, aJ O aJ VI Q aJ O � a --i N +O O v N Vf L aJ C6 `� Q °-Fl E L C6 i aJ Q> L C,A t= oLo (U U N O w +' C6 aJ L i +- _ +' > N aJ t=Q- 0 N aJ > U m (6 L cn >j t= t= m U-0 +-� (U Q m� t= O +� O C,A H w (6 Q a v Q Q H (6 Ov N w O U O aJ lD v .Q N nA •� aJ to v 06 i OE 4-� aJ O CSA O +' N °-0oo oO° v E v 6 }C + C: 0 v +- c: v �U � 4 X QaJ p n v cVn VI O i O �v v > O Q C6 C6 ~ N C6 aJ + LJ C6 ° E CLO � > i L N LU aJ ca N - > (U caJ CO 4 - CLO Ln U> N c N ._ U p Q U aJ L > c N N O r,4 > O N N cn c�i� d> L N +' — > a--� aJ ?� Q N aJ N •— Ca O aJ c +� LO N N aJ N U C6 + 4- ° aJ Q N O > +� VI aJ > QJ vCLO Q +' +' a i +, O L > U vI v U v N L aJ N O C) -U m CSA ca aJ L N +' Q (6 Q O N N O� O ,� v ai U 'Q E > E dp L O E 0 0 O-F C: V 6Q-0 N ON O fa U Q p O aJ > p� � � aJ p UU iQ VcNnI LJ M Q aJ O O c— Q O `^ _ai +' v Qt6 cn o v v�o> aJ N O = � O O aJ O > Ln C-4 OaJ ai Oai O N ++O C O NaJ U O 'N aJ U a--' 4 L U_ N + aJ .� N w •� _ m +' > +� (a L aJM + N (a (6 0 m > aJ E ?j +' — N (6 N N a-- 4– M 00 O M L Q ° Q aJ M�Q- w L a--' O ff' +' L C6 V1 fa c -I 00 Q m r -i 'N i +�. v Q N CL > � Q Q p LO +� of aJ .� .� +� Q aJ N O � U} 4- O aJt� ca N > Q ra 0 E Q Q H Q � Q U O +� L E N— o `—^ ca a, v 3 3 Q �a aJ v o > o v � v v 4- - > v v +- (n °0 u ° +- oo a° �'m0o ° �- vLo Q U Q O tLD ca C Q Y aJ to �' '-P N O LJ C v to L O Q cn � � (u to > � -0 Ev M >O O to U o0 Q ON a N > � > aU Q p n ONO> Q aJ N O QJ U � aJ > o (a: > Q C > ca w � v +> M N O E +� v cn ca qp �n v > +, +- Q +, � (n >° Q � c v Q ca v Q Q 4- L> M ca O o v° 3 m v v o o E v QL O nA o m � N v_ Q M vi C N w F > U �n Q ca Q+ Q aJ ca v Q Q v Q v aJ E cu oo '� �, �, a, 4- O L M p O mQ E L L QJ Q O Ca Q aJ O E Q LJ •� . v Q v U U H N (6 >j U O° +' Q Q rL6 . L QJ O O U '� Q E O m p +, — Q U U v aJ +� Y qp Q M O U B O QJ +� O C6 p L aJ -0 N w (6 > N� E Q E i (a ° QJ U .— vcL6 L U U QN :L� O a- 1 .- � U aJ p O Q U ai Q- O E� o'CO }pp ' O �> E m o O Co aU-N to > W M Q) 7a -0 E O m v L6 — ca — ul iCva O ca Z � -0 m � Q vi aJ aJ N +1 ?: > N OU N N V Q } OC _O QJ�— aJ Lo ca m— O v E p Q aJ > Q N O O N Q c L Q aJ Q� Q >> O L Q > c aJ C6 CSA Q 0= >> v O w c v v >° v� o m E p c> E v °U aJ M° U� > U cn 4-•i M U Q._ Q U (a 0 v L aJ -I– W E — W 8- �n 0 N m o N N (U Q� L � •-P C N L c QJ V o VI QJ nA trs +- N N— C6 C6 U L +� N .`^ p aJ L p N N p i > c N % QJ QJ v L t= QJ X U W C6 p U U U aJ C6 N QJ N QJ > CSA V L G > C6 QJ E M QJC6 N QJ N 'L _ C6 -1-- > O O O C6 -_ O QJ N C6 0 +v .v C)> N U L 0 +- O cl�+, CSA QJ C6 >-0 L CO > i m QJ W CLOv t= O O CLON N>� ?� N O QL C6 0 CO 4- - CA LL QJ N QL -O �' cN C +v- Q N� a - O ON QO u C6 m N L L QJ Z� LL O� Q i O N O N N m .L Crs�„ ra a i U aj - to CSA +- o N ' L U Z� t= CSA m i > M M y +- QJ U N QJ C= L - O c +� C N +� ra O p to > U •Q U •� C:I% > L tY m QJ QJ N C6 L > > N .2 OL ° ai L OU +QJ � > CC O C6 LO L > L (6 E 4-+.i CLO Q m _I_-ai +� - p i O 'L : t= m O Q a--� = +, CO N - C6 QJ CSA O 'L +� ° '� p c7FW ?� Z Q t= N U N N N '� p U m m N No O ai O U +L' ai Q t= N O O p c N QJ '� Z N +� +' > Q) N O O — OL Q- ON S O 0 LL L QJ E % a--� H a'' c C6 > C L 0 N (6 a--� ai Q Z O v C6 L W N N O O L CL6 Q V = L p a' N T, M H ra O V QJ QJ Q N QJ m m Q O In Q Q % N QJ Crs QJ QJ N N a_., O Uj .t- 4- U Q L L c H U� O ul � U O Q U (6 O QJ CL N c OD N o �, -P � 'N N 3 �� Q� O�� 1-- v N > v O % L W N v a--� i QJ 0 C6 N E L +, -0 -_ N > U c Q Z U +� o o v v v Q} O o > O J U i t= (6 QJ H N N +� U aJ N •> p •> O O O aJ L X > 4- - QJ t= O_I-_ L t= L L U � p > -1- ro 4- 0 -&- +-Q N Q CO CLO+- UL Q) L N QJ QJ i p NE N QJ L CSA O QJ N O C6 -0 m -0 4- � O CLO O '- N ' 1 C6 v O O +� CSA +=3 N +-� N Y i ° N >- UA QJ O 0 � `m t= N v N N p 0 O aJ CO N U — v Q N C� v t= E U U O C6 .L i N N O } O t= m O N N > a--' N a--� � O o '� C� O U N ai QJ QJ ,V N t= ` ai L m Q N U N U N Q N E i ai aJ N� ^ O N L Q Q L +- > m pm N ,}O CB CLO> +Or L O E (U ° 4- QJ E QJQJ d t= J QJ N O C6 CO +-� L .X Q N Q .v Q Q a --i -Q N N a"'i N m — aJ v t= v =3C6 L C ,C t= t= N Q E L WLn +r C6 L N v 0_ C6 L N aJ Q +' LO C U C6 CB ai v Q ~ v v L v 4- C6 O ai N U u a > E L Cy Q L (6 QJ .ai U t6 OL QJ QJ L t6 QJ U QJ O O ai v U .0 (4 aN LL l A C)~ Q v t= +� + O O L Q L — N > CLO C6 C6 i > D > C6 QJ c N N Q) +' +- N N o O QJ -F, U Q) > O --v v a= > v v o o v 3 v n o n v a N° �j — C� L QJ ` QJ >` j —N- > > +� .� Z nA > +� > cvn Q �_ 'L trs +� L trs L N p QJ �, L Q trs QJ > QJ M trs QJ � aJ +-� m E p C_ — t= ._ Ln QJ Ca O >� +-� L U +-j M U +' QJ QJ QJ > QJ +� N N — (6 N Q L N QJ 4- 4- 4- L C:) O > 4- N Q O � tL6 v QJ v U � QJ +' QJ > C QJ +' ai > v nn v i Q v U-- i t= t= m C6 N L v Q v i o O 6 E C>6 i QJ N C6 W N M b0 QJ O C'6 -- N +-- U 4E N= +.i L Z U L C= Q •�, H� v N L aJ c. v �-0W °U > U -0 ro . . . . 0 o � � � m u « \ o \ k E . u $ % a u 2 2 \ \ ?k { a m 2 0 3 ® o u % e ± \ k '� « 2 C)- « .g m q / .g w 2 § k \ \ C E m e m E m 3 CLO -0 .> ) � •k � m � \ - \ 2 U § � � / � / / 0 > > 7 E o m \ ± °'ao-1-- -0 » E 4- Q Q- ® o u > \ m U u ° E \ ® �0 % CLO ?$ 4 k m m U m \ / » » G 2 n / o CI- q E o E o u .� E 2± 0 2 / 2 o- m £ « y - 2 m .Ln A z jj- J'y tot Al�l 'Af LU LL e LL UF 100 A w 4r LL- cn rL '4E LL A Q) L o O �0 v� In Q co v E co bz C C: aj •Q -4- O N ul ul Q) U ulc O u7 CL L z LU n N Q- 0 + N C/7 v E v ro > a v `� L N v - Z, Q vi v M v NQ a� O vi Q L � CY? — a cz � a o L Q- v v CN u� Q O Qo � v c V> cn O v O N + co v v v v— 73 aQonoLZ° C-) ri ry r� .4 gyri Q nA O U uo cn E N r6 Q , 4- ro > L ro x a o E a, L a, — > O v F a v a, v v E Q '� — +� aJ O E t6 Q L E Q w +' N A L +� U U 'Q CoLm Q O L N V N N O N Q L>0 aj O L 4-° C Q a) Q Q O U Q v O v O N Co aJ '^ aJ aJ Co O LLN • a Q ° V ro N > H v r6 E Q- `� UCLO �, v v nn > .0 4, v — _ 4- +� O v L Q Q v coo `^ Q- n > C6 Q Co > ro `� co N > N Q v + �n v v Q 0 +' ° Q r6 OU txo Q o v CLO co a' '� 'v ° 3 • v v co Q— CLO O � `^ v E v v o o° v a� o o �, a, L a, CL N ro > co ai Q O Q C aJ � `� v 4- ((10 C C '� N 4 c +-� L U r6 L W CLO N F o o L aj — +� v o o. g n v +, ai ro Lo '- E E S nA 0, L aj w�� Q N>� L v U� -. U v s= s= v v > +, L x a' m v m L E Q bz O Q- Q O E E N N N Z W Q E L L> L Q C a) Lo E aJ L �O O U M N O +' 4- N O > O aJ v L aJ .0 aJ aJ N ° U NO cNo N Q �' ,o c E c aJ �n 0 N o Q) N N CLON p N UCLO CLO Q O + N U-0 N L L N VI C6 +- bz m U Q '^ N N p L VI 4-v N VI v Q 0 C 4- N N •�, N (4 N > L p L C6 U Q_ v N 4--L NCLO -0 LL C6 U Q N N > _ -0 o m N E L LQ +- m U m o N n W ° ° ° Q QM 4- xo M ° c w oo o v oL Q + O CSA E U N L N a v Q> ' U p U Q C6 0 Q_ Q E 0 Q N N m N +O N L O V Q U C6 Q 0 U > +� - m O M N > p Q Q v N -0 N N NO U In n E +� Q +� N U Q N Q Y > N -0 +' N nA � N N -0 i N U N U L (6 N U > N Q Q N +' Q G I L 0 N i-' U N E Q N Q 'L LC CO UL 76 OL O O QL V1 v Q N wv Q N N a"I p ..pa- C6 > C6 4- bz C Q N N L C6 Q v CLONCO Q Q C6 L vCO UN v v C X Lo v v Z.— U C N U N m .— -Fua--� Cr N N C6 > L v U x U C6 Q_ N QL E qp N E m N U a N (p a)� C N E N 4J E N `� > N N N N U U U C6 p V a L Q 0 L Q N N o N O v v L N U Q- QJ L C U �p 0 >j > 0 v acac�acLnacC)a> m C6OU =Q U E o L + Q O 0 v 0 0 v v Q +N vv _c U O t6 Q N L v o- C6 N ai 0 N N U U C� i > V +-I - N 0 Q O lxA C6 U L Q OCO Q Q O L Q p -0 0 Q N 4- v (6 > L v 0Q o t6 U o N v 0 N vi E ,� v U to O>. L U OCC) + 0 • L v N v O +� N Q nAC N Q '^ Q v Q' -03 -c Q 0 N E U ` VI 0 +' -0 C6 N L +� 0 VI Q c p Q )" O lu w v v N N E M OU N m v N L - ai O N L > C6 L > Q- o N v co: C6 E O N Q +, d- MC6 0 nA N N N Q_ v N-0 -0 N -0 v i — � v N-0-0 Q v Q Q C6 N Q Q p v O N + Q nA v Cw Q L Q C6 Q . C� i > 0 U > 6N c 0O C6 (6 (6 CQSA C_ th +1 pp N N ° +aj Q cn qA d LO Q v N O N N v N c. Q c• - Q N o� Q +� N N Q O cn N Q + 1 N F S V Q V t6 v 0 0 t6 t6 S O v 0 L L ; O p Ln G m 4} _c L.L U �--I G G U W Vi M Lo �--I Lo O 0 - Y > > -0 0 Q , 0 Q 4- N c� G Q) 4- ul Q) N U v 0 N L N Q c O .N Q x Q) Q) ul N Q) Q) O 4- L N L O N ( c Q W +, NO .� v +aJj .O } ++aJ(6 W O O + N O Q QJ +' aJ 2 v Q (6 O E v +� Z M Q '� Q aJ x 0 L v U v o a m E c Q- - v> *' p� X> v a aJ v Co v > Q a O a O L `� O> u (UNJ > C6 L VI O C6 O L N N O c aJ N U v l�A C6 C6 G aJ L + VI Q V aJ VI np Q +� +' N N *' a Z N U O O O N L c6 c m aJ M M N � N N Q Q.c - Qiv + c v p v .� •L > > C6 N L +� aJ O L U v L N v aJ 0 aJ c Q Q Q L Q v aJ Q> N N N N C6 aJ a Q Z ltA ~ U a O O ui Q 0_ a-' m— `� `� W Q +� N L Q i O Q U cn cn M 0 Q- Lo ai ai O— O v aJ �n �n c m Q Q m Q mQJ Lo d U Q>-0> L a +1 c6 v U c ;�v v pv •QN v .v`n > Q o° o 0 n v ° -0 CLO v v v `Ot (U 4- �-0� (LU c6 N nA nAQ Cov W co OQU � > c� W O� aJ L aJ v> v o 0 0 °' O o °J o aJ x m O C6 vI aJ +� aJ aJ U L N m E W Q w m J QJ O V �E U aJ -0> � aJ 'N N aJ Q c aJ O W m O d aJ +' � U L > Ti— +� LJ aJ L +� O O c aJ N aJ J L 0 c Q L aJ c 5 v v c N E= p aJ > p A N O Z O c +� O t6 M y Op v Q L aJ § c = *- v +' m N VI U U L aJ E U cn N (6 E (6 U `~ (6 +� Q aJ QJ (6 O L `� L L aJ L VI aJ d U +� O d N U U U N U.- M O v O c 0 v U c6 c N> i L > Q Q> Q Q O >�> v `^ F 3 +� — ._ +� +' > aJ O +� '� Q m ul '.P m aJ c > w +- Q S. - Q) v 2 U > > Q) 4- c Q) ul ul Q) Q) O 4- v � � aJ N Ln Ln v Q- aJ > O N Co c aJ Q 4- Co x -C a) c +- N U co v :2 N > > f6 v > 0 v c v_ co O - Q c L v L L N co � E c LnM E v 0 N 4 o =" v v +vi �n O v +' O O c �J 0 > a- .4— N N ~ 1 U Q O Q nA v � +J Q Q +J Lo o° v v o o v CLO •� v c v Q- � � •� � + c c v v U L rI N C6 L >j O aJ LS > O Ln •L U LO N N L v p c U C6 O v c6 c6 N C6 -0 O �„ �� 'L c c U '^ O � vi � +� c �C v NC6 N aJ aJ Q Q- QJ *' O E oC a' L m" o v CLO bA N N U Q L .T v Q v> +� v O U aJ VI N Y > aJ L QJ E aJ aJ aJ v> + 0 a n E o v U L + O m (U c U t6 v O U p v 0 4- 4- (1)4-;ncA N 5 Q QL E L L O Q un N S O = O Q> Q z a 0 ao E c6 cn � -I N M Ln -zr-,00 ci -I -I r -I v � � aJ N Ln Ln v Q- aJ > O N Co c aJ Q 4- Co x -C a) c +- N U co v :2 N > > f6 v > 0 v c v_ co O - Q c L v L L N co � E c LnM E v 0 N O O N}O +, o O� vO Q C6 N O0 OU Q - ° C6 C aJ Q) v L v O C Crs v C6 CSA a) + +� v �� U W 3 v L m U cn �O N N L *' N U X �^ E c v O bz N N bz Q C6 Ln v aQ C6 C C6 v •`�' C v L C O O C U ?> Ov Q Q VI U a C C6 U a v O v v O _a L (6 U L N v E +� aJ .N aJ O VI Ln aJ aJ C L O aJ U (10 C C C Q C aJ N aJ v N E Q� +v U c .- aJ E Q Q v LC:I� L `cp C O > C6 o x C6 ai o O C6 O> '.F E m ca � L aj M 0O Q Ln w cNa Q �n v Q OQ 4- > > 4- U L U aJ v L O v m N� 0 y (6 N N aJ i v .N N +' 4- O 'vi Q v t6Lo U c U m E C m o C C mu p O > � +� +' (U ?> -0 n a) — N .- N C CLOt= U x C-0> N aJ O J U C L U C C6 Co Q Q v O a� N 0 M n x aJ C aJ C C)--0 CC6 v m aJ L U Lo v N +, m CSA v v v N N +' �Lo QU LO c m O +' O Q +' E v X '� V C C aJ i O aJ N bA -0 CLO N N aJ aJ C X N U C +' 3: O > > ~ N LU co t= CLO a -0 C -0 4 C O C U� X i v �n .� C A co c O +•i +� co VI •L Co a) > U L O 'n L CSA • C6 VI U C V L O i 0 Q Q N vi CLO C +1 N . U (J Cy X E aJ N U Q) Q) M m E w m Q aJ t= o v � � aJ v m> v U � v +� o� 3 > L>— C�> o> N x O v U O — Q Q Vl ._ — +� � 4- �i 0 m m aJ CO > m H L L N cu O I Q- L C6 V1 v Q O Q a --i i O neo U .� v O v c o v w �n nA �„ C6 m E(u (u (U Q Q �, o- 3 Z� o� '; n• '� 4, v O O� Q� 0 +' v m � c N L Q L v Z Z O O O Q Y m>> N Q- C v N v- v p v Q ,� LJ co CSA Q (6 N N N LU N (U aiO + +, (6 O a C N U Q N E 0 N > qpO (6 = c I IL Q N O N N> U ct[ � C N N-2 W 0 (U' 1=L N N 3 E a � OL + O N— LL 4- O N co N 'X Q Q N(U Q t6 N > — N nA 4 (U O cvi� O (U N vi N O � � N +' (O +1 O(U Q Q C O Q H v Q CO Z O O (O v oN O °J v o Li o O a; v L Z O -0 M° v v o �_ cn Q N L O +1 m 0 nA v (U ('o }; � Q u u> (U = a v Q ° o° °o o Q N (6 N +-' cn O L N i W c E (6 N Q- CU 0N— 0 V N U Q— C > CLO w (6 X X N U N np vi Ti -0� w (6 +� N c L N W N (u N O Q v Q Q v m O C Q Q nA O N Z Q v -0 +, 0 Q `-^ N >j Ti N c n�>+,� Q 'V L o v W_ O X N� N c N N CU v txo p v °' v vnn (u o 00 mo ° o S-� ° Q > v o v o M w o v v v �' a Q-0 Z(u o v (mo (u �; n v Ti Q U M E } v, v v rn c6 v . v +' ''' CLO w O o n v v nn z E v v +' O •- o v Q N L L L O O Q N + E O +� cn N (6 N i' N Q (6 Q O O L CSA L Q Q L (6 N m � Ti O U Q N Q � N— a 0 v U� (L6 X N (U N V +� +� nA N -0 +-� C6 +' v N (6 vI O (0 L N (u (U Q v a p O Q H v Q_ �j 0- U O v N O o `^ v � 0� t6 oC M E L _ L X N Q -o u Ln v Q Q VIO C6 +' U U N m O O N> m-0 CSA (U (6 cn v 4-O O .Q N(U N Q O N > L cn N = N ?j O - U U _ 0 CLO Q Q � __ (6 o Q O O Q C v O •Q L (6 > -0 (U 75 Q Z� ?� a c (6 a (U E N i W .4- 0 --� C6 C6 O (U � W O cn cn Q bz 4- = � ?> (6 L N O > ' V (U (6 � Q i Q \ O Q a (6 O N — 'N O N N N E N.9 L O Q cn + OC Q Q N W � ' > Nm > ui > Q O NOQO Q Q Q :2Q } 4.1 N C: 0 n X v w Lri O n N v ++' 'U �4.1 Q_ m> Q w p0 O U M O� O U 4- `� M N +� N Q �n o cin U `- N O v L N(u > v°j 4- � (6 + (U (U +, N O f n O nA � Cl — Q N v- L} M m >j E o E v +, > a� nA "\ .� C 4- w �, cn cn M v Q S w nA o V m Q Q i U M bA N (6 > N-0�• =� P ((4 N :Ev 3 X> C6 >v l"UN O Q O C (6 v� N v • • • W > Q -0 nA (6 c c (6 Q .F,� vI J i Z v C (6 N + + N C V, > ?:j -6 to QJ QJ — N O O Z +' c6 +' N ° N O ° C ro chi, � O v O U v x Q v— C Q� ai 4—> W +�aiCL Qj -0 i tLo C c) Q U,A H C N •x ul Q c: N v W> O Q Q v, Q O 'u, x aJ v z nA C +, o C c6 Q- v + QJ Q C9 C t�NtA, U U> QvI •QQ O pc -6 `QvJ 4+-Z O E U Q> U O +_ NUc)-7jO O> > tLo � cc(> ul (10 00 C +-— Q- 666 to N N Lo 1 x O v N + Nv� )O> ° C) OQJ0 N Q O Q N N i ° 6 QJ } -0 ac o n -1 4.0 :3 O C� 0 E -a N H C QJ> NJ C N U cn O{+ a',� L U > QJ v, QJ Nm MMQ O +' vi vi c6 QJ LJ L QJ cUi, Q N QJ c6 U N >j N O OC N O > ° � 00 QJ .G v O O Q M Q QJ O Y H •� �n L •0 co O Ol M L > J L +� QJ U U u 4 +� "� Q +� O c -I N L v C M H N v m O E -a N U Q '�, c6 E- ° 3 v v N CCC .Q v v cccs O- v Q QJ L L Q U N G to U v> N v N QJ u LUQ O O O > V O QJ U ° Q + VI cn N v O r' a � — -0 +' � -0 tLo � N o CO 4 v = v C O> O w CLO N CLO L �_ N N L a +1 E E cr N m LU O L E O N QJ w N ,b?:N C +' +� L U N ttA C O Q v +� 0 c6 C O QJ aj Q 4 O Q N> O O O N O '� p E N N N c6 > vi v c6 N +� v N v O ° N +' W O QJ v N M L t v N N N +' nA N QJ In N •.p > Q •O CQ L >— > N + w N a"•� N +.i U ° N E N v Q m N V N QJ VI C6 C6 +� QJ QJ QJ m U Q c6 EN ,n U C N C • L QJ VI U QJ L U +- 3 v ° o > o C C v v O �� °' o C �-C+, O QJ Mew o > v M O u E O Q Q v L O v C ttA v L •�' VI � +' U +, O N > N t § U QJ VI E C6 v C6 > to v L N �-� O v N _C ~ L U x QJ .� v aj >. L N U Q N U ,n O N _ U ° � L c6 am° E C p� w O N C O O�°_C 4- O E Q +' N N Q O QJ w v O (6 — U +' N QJ +- O U L t 4- M O E U O Q- UA C U C Q° N QJ +� v N L N C .`^ v +� -0 0 °> i C C v N O C6 C M C O >� N j > N N QJ M O +' +� C cn M N VI C QJ C LO +� � i Q C Q C i C Q N B Q N C 6 v L H E w m a"� N U O 'N QJ QJ QJ Q •N `n Q M M C L E QJ -M C6 L E (QE 4- U In (U C C U L N N Lo M -Fa> -C '� Lo N aC -C CO O° O O N C N U O QJ Q Q Q C . X U +' oC t o 0 0 Q C ('� O N L N O QJ v L O N C Q U > VI N v 0 N '� v Q QJ o M c6tLo N> v 0 •� CO E Q Q C N N Q C > QJ O E O OU N- m m • • • U Q N 0 Ul .� b w O C A I On O v N v + Ln o v Co N > = o r6 v E o Q v ° "' nn o a .o o�° ° a, o� Q- _ o X Lo ra ' QJ o Q ° 00 • > n °o v+ o v v -0 CO Q QJ > ° '� a, o o QJ O L O N O t6 LU O aj r6 N N Q wN r6 rv6 1 L N N r6 N— N + Q v Q '�n OZaj 0 OL vi nA'� av w .Q v v v m y tlOnA v Q Q m Q > N r6 > + Q +Q �� a, o� o��.N N Q v _Lo v 4— O j v o o> o O Q — � N N +J ai NL$ E_ Q v Q vv v v O° 'Q4) v N O o > 3 Q ° v°�' O o L o_ac�� u�=� o'_ ra o v v N v �^ ra � + Q v E> -0 v Lo� ra to oL v� X v a v> nA Q v v-0 Q +� v v v v 4- N `� O L v VI O ra v v O C N O > ov ° O c+'n N Q Z Q° L N~ L Q r6 X C6 O O L N O O nA N O v v v O O wO j > E� O} i v a Q c N C6 C6 v *' Q = m ° O CL O O o v ra Q v-0 to Q� Q Q O Q 4- O O v� Q N r6 Q v ("6 'L O ra N+ N L Q QJ Q Q Q} N Oul — r) N > O 7 L Q O O O v O Q N Q O v ,v v L M O (Q6 +-j O c N r6 X N Q- ,0 N Il d •N Q Q N N U +� N N of > O r6 O N >, c i a � U v � OJA . f :J � din ra xY u i t m O N { 4 Ap Fl_ �n 0 N 4- Q) co L i Q) v 4- — LO +- C Lo O Q v O a oca •L jrr —_ O v 0 CU o n o 0 O a, Ln CLO o v 71 � un v0" L E o c Q_ N N ?� r" -0 Q_ v — o i as o O cuto 3 O v N w v v> -0 `� v `� N v v o = �_ v L v v M � w (u •> +- > -0 � c' v i n L aJ aJ ' Co 4- O •L >-0 .E vo Q o E n. v E L E L Q N- O vO O Q O U c0 O •> 1 nA + L v 0 v Q- Q N N vVi Q co -0 O O QQ- (10 4- `° N c co 2> v Z� °J N v O v v Co v _0 > 0 ac Q_ L v . o•v Q- O CLO U 'v CSA Q CSA L CLO (U +' aJ v v s= O N v +� Ln CLO O CLO Q (6 L O (o N= X L Q +� v > } .c (� O Q -0 L v O '-Fl v Q C O • v - v v • • � � CLO _a Sv - G p (u N LE v O � 4_ 4-> cn �� W aJ �� Q > CLA CLA +J v v 4, O > O Co > Lo L L a- U • �_ �_ L v N '� L a- (o U Cr O a N VI Co w (o aJ Q Q_ O v a-- Q i U co aJ O C v • L 4-O L U a--� Co O `� > Q v a a C 4 v a, a- vCLO N _� o 0 v �n 0 N 4- Q) co i 3 v 4- — LO +- C Lo O Q v O a oca •L jrr s= v 0 CU o n o 0 O Ln > v 71 � un L v 'U c aj o v N 3 r" v — o i as o O cuto O aJ +, w u E v N -0 N o + -0 o = v v co v v '.F, CL� v v -C +- > -0 � a � c v i > L aJ aJ ' Co 4- O •L >-0 Q o E n. v E E E L ro vO j ca O •> 1 > + CU Ln �' o N v -0 v v Q- c O ~ Ln N 2> -0 (U °J > 'L O v v Co -_ u > 0 ac Q_ L v . �n 0 N i -7— --jr jrr 71 G r" u V] +J i as cn IF F r3 7,f �n 0 N i L� ' I Oa' z > vo o cv OE Lo M v O ma} v s 4- N c QJ v-0 N -I- U U > m 4- +� Q) �_ Lo O nA N N Q- -I- L VI vi QJ v >` QJ p QJ L J L Lo L Q) >, 0 N O N _I_- -� � VI QJ QJ cd •> QJ QJ O O N L C6 wO L U v 0 cc cd co L Co U QJ (6 O cn Q QJ C: — CLO O OJ O M N O u QJ +, > —� w QJ O co c O 4- qp N +- O z s N= O QJ ?> > L _ _ QJ +� N O i N •N q-- -I-- QJ > U N� L QJ N M co N v 0 Q v 4- J vI QJ u Q N c O +_� Lo QJ QJ \ MQJ 0 N Q- N L Q N I QJ nA co Lo U v N DEE MMU v C7 ,, a s N QJ E U > CSA U 4' +� co s cNi� N = N EU C: +� N co M N +� O > X qp X ,} bA O QJ +� � +� QJ QJ — �„ '^ U QJ co QJ c L QJ O •� a--� E L > QJ > v v L -0 aJ v vi OU -a a Y v i6 �° O = 0 O a N v Co Q ai �' a- O L io vI vnnI > QJ QJ C6 NC Q ° -Qv QCLO (U NE N ••ov 2fO N NOEO Q vJ N ° 0lai Q- -0 > X O Q v O v Lo > i Lo •�j ° L N L •L C6 C6 L M C)Co V QJ QJ E L v �' 3 v o a v v I° ° v� v°� u c v � �_ v O +, QJ N U -0 � QJ s �n QJ QJ �n v -0 0 1- U ?i O m 0 -NN ' v N L Co Q- Q O O vG nn > v v O +' o Q o v N�� o Q� �� m o v � '� � nA ° v N a p o nA cid '�n +� +� +� >O '� c U O E c Ti X ltA U-0 QJ L Co O cd U to L C6 O VI O QJ QJ aJ L L vi to O QyJ Q, N U QJ U ttA L �' QJ L cn U N QJ v k Q H S Q O m v O� v C° m-0 Q Q O _LU +Ow o N d O CA QJ Q v � v o � (Da o — > v > N 3 Q O N O +' U co _ 3 c U QJ O aj aJ N +5. S O v > > N Q N LO NO , U O O> Q N v N N 0 LO N"(U x W N N N QJ u 0 O aj p U aj Q aJ � QJ to +� U N L Q aJ QJ ' N E Co }.� QJ N Co In U E 12- CL C:aj a QJ° O QJ QJ Q+ N N v• bA H t1A O U N +� N N v L Q v +' E• N O cd np np C QJ •.G E Q .c O C A 7a E L+' U QJ N aJ — cin (N6 aJ QJ E QJ L p QJ O L VI aJ ai L l�A 0 > L Q H Q 0-0 N co co -0N Q-0 U- O O co O� v 0 O N •NCLO Q v O ; CLO v N^ v v L Q Q Q W O U Q v v L U v �° ° v Y > w p v '� QJ > QJ �-� N QJ Q) p L QJ M �-VI QJ N a"' •�-i L O L aJ > CSA . O +� O Q L L Q U Q a) -0 L U J O m CLO aJ N N aJ aJ N L —a -Lo VI — �'' E Q V L ° Y a"� L iw N cQ iJ U Q ai — aJ O a--� M N Q- .L Q-0+,4- E C6 Q Q v Q Q L N > Q QJ a--� Q ° L > QJ N nA ` O nA OL N o- 0 +� +� > Y Lo N qim L Q } N E O� c6 Q LO U Q m ai `� I OL aJ O t6 Q Q O cn aJ ai v O Q ai -0 v +' -0 aiQ ai N O L E L }.i O ° QJ O QJ QJ c6 C6 `1 U L L a -- y"' U L QJ N QJ C6 N Qtxo E-0 +' � Y v aJ v v v> M U L v> +1 aj QJ QJ \ O Q U ° N L N v ai L N c6 U a Q- E o v v L7 v N v' 3 v x o +- +, O O +� U aJ aJ > N QJ v 3> v O Q c o o v '� v •� a}J Q o x v v o o >° v o o a°Jc > N L (6 W Q c6 L c6 N L Q nA +� +' O N 3 — E Y .— +� L N U 4J aJ aJ N O N L M >�o O ° Ov ° t6 v otQtA U — 6 � N m +, +' w N >Q O J v v v U L OO Q O aJ Q QQ°Q aJ v-0 p O > aaJJ O 4 L C6 L O i N = 3 Q v +' v > Q Q QJ4- 4- i s v nA Y Q v° Q> O o aJ > Q- W L.LN CSA � L '� � � L � � cl-L a -- L C) aj > Q - O cl� O p 3 Q L O O� x aj O a(6JNXvQc QN Lf6 ai ° W O iy+ N N L U ) N 4J ° `^ o f a o 3 v o N a v Q-0 � o 3 3 > Y L 3 v o -Fo�� v v o a °'s oU o �" QJ -- +, z v p v E o c�i� c6 L .c6 N +' _ CL Q aJ Q -0c6 > N � o O 0 o nA 3 o of /On o. N a S v `^ + v° v v L > O C6 ;n L Q •N c6 C6 c6 N n o� n•v ° a o v L v v 'nn n Q- 0 o CLO or X ^ v x> U a +, Q v o Q o v Q v v v N N N W (6 N X •� +'�+ 'x N N N aJ + O o= �° v U - ° �, L v o + Y N� c6 +� L oC Q- ai LL:I� O� 'a > Q L O +� Q aj O Q L c+i� cn ° N ° N N -0 U aJ O aJ i QJ m O w � Q .L > I- m .Q O Q co v O 3 Q v c6 m E C) m J v W U U Ln �' P + Ln 0 N CD N Q N v v v `^ Q J j •� O v _I_- O -6N � p v .v CSA ro O U aJ Q p v r- LU U O > Q.U N > 0E CA -0 L Nm -I CA ( -0 v O +- O ai Q- •L U N (6c U C6 O6m aj O +r Q O +- n aJ O O N aJ aJ C L6 L Ci lD > U >j C6 L O N O O C= X aJ C6 aJ > 'L O +-1 U aJ +' = 0 0 L n — aJ Q_ p + U Q aJ t= t= E O E v •V U v cUc G v C6 0 L + ai p ai L ai 0 U OO +, aJ N 'i O aJ L N aJ C6 C6 L N p O > O L N N c p Co v N o CSA a�-1 Q_ + VI CSA H o U •> L N I Lo + C6 Q OU Q (6 L v N L v v Z U > t=U E O M (6 a--1 N H (6 U +' ai p N L O X v `� aJ O O t6 v v C a N ai > v t= v Z *' =3a--1 Ca N O .� +r CSA + O aJ +' O > +' > t6 ,} LL O aJ N N -0 c RC1 Lu + v N v ooc L°o v v o o o o v E n g > v o o t= 00 O1 W `� Q °; t= +, +, a, m L +, v > >� C6 Q; O Q_ Q_ v O v + ,� (A > ca o E v 42 +' t= Q O Q O o v v N o v +' O Q N o v cn cn +r O L L.LO a c Ca '> (u U E 0p .N Ca L Q) 0 : N (") � > co `^ Z Q > t= aJ U c6 U N t= L v N C6 C np — N CU6 VI a"1 Q QJ Q O v o v 00 •Ca _ +r \ > L Q v N 0 C6 p N tL O v CA >c � ON NO >> ai _I-_I_-QN•N O +' 4- O ( D 4- Q co O +, oC X N Q_ p W +1 O C +' �+- L(10 � -0 v oO ai O O.aJ Lo N :2 > 2 Qj V> c Q >Q Ca Q N nA aJ t= > C6 C6 C6 aJ > �^ C6 O ?� Q H C6 U N aJ � L t= aJ c aJ aJ _ (u a) �( > N cn V N +-1 O CSA O + — O (U H O -0 Ca cn or_ c -I C= LL W > Ca 2 +' Ca ?� N +v-1 N O C� L v i N U• N 4 N N aJ L vI (6 v ' w cvi� >j CQj W av y aj N -I-N U aJ Ca M ai 4- ai O > 3 WQ, +, +' v N v a, O aC > >, o a to O aJ >MC Q_ t= t= W v '� a O v Q oo� a,Evv. - >��QJ oc Q> vU ° a `^ CLO o o � o v Q Q o ul c -0 a a a o �Q, c m=L n N° 0 U v v v Lo3 Qj v'1 Lo •_ _ o D ca 0 CL t= v aQj > av-1 VI L o L Q_ (u W O o N °' ,� 'v E v Q U Uc v ,> ai txo ai O OI S ° v V) G L L N L a"'1 L N v �` CS > 4---1 N W N �O U a�--1 U U U a >, C6 O aL-1 � U VI VI C6 L O j O LO N L O G m O > v aJ M O O 4--1 cn v Q N Q .� +� to > aJ QJ a a, o s s= v v v v v QO � v> v Q c v > U v� .? O ca O a ai Q1 a N v, LL O Q- >' t= � O D U v > — v >j Ln aJ v> v t= a Z QJ ai v� (6 N C aQ •— Co �> L a--1 +-1 U v C Z> pL O i � v L aj N v by N U Qj S O O j U 0> Q- U O VI L C { a C) O or- t= t= t= N Ca-� U p N> LL wE v t= t=om U Qj = i�'G C Qj � aj > C6 > Ca � � >,a>> O +_, L L -0 -0 m 3 Q � C6 C6 M = u O Q Q� •a.+ ° '- p CSA cn CLO (n 'v 'v N Ca N Z m U v a--1 U+ (6 +Nai -1 t= aJ U O Q1 ° +Co t= w � N N t= -1 Q- � Q OL N O co Co L i L LU S aJ Co > (U Ca E aJ > '� cLt is E�� iaac HaC E> is aQ0> 0 CD N .Q- O V~ N + N v > N CSA C>6 4- L > > vI V O U N (6 L N .v V L a N- -0 Ca N t= (�6 Q C6 N> N � L N U v CO (U } E m a(U n >o > +' c p O (U•� N N v L N N N Q N Co C C6 o L L N U N CSA v O � > LJ O-0 N U~ L N H N Q -0 > V L } Q N v _ _ V o L to Q to U (6 L ° v C v > U Q U -0 > ra v c(6V •OL •v U L t= > L O I vwwwvvV L>U (V C(V(V (Q) U > v> O -0 >Ov > N o O (V Ca cn C +, (u -0 CLo N > N U O N> V >� V O i L L .v >� LA O N (a N L N (6 N Q> >j N O O (u t= N C L Y CSA O p Co v >� _ > > N Q }, C6 C6 VI C6 'L .> O N +� to N Y N tL �n �, N O m Q �^ t= v > � +� O .v L v cn 'cn CL6 C6 N +� U >� N C6 O N UU 1 O QJ (V ti o > � `~ •v Ca C6 •UA L Q O L 4- > (V C v -0 >` U L Q- 5 o vQL > c Q t= - L O �_ O +-� i .- LJ of N = t= > � 00 > i L N cn Ca dJ N +J U > } O N t6 C6 cn E O i O vi E N 4- N N (u CLO(u _ O '> p v> cQa N Y N Q O LCo � C6 _ .� U >, ca t= O ~ U (V > Q v L vi M +- is � Q i +� Q 1 N O O O o v cn Ca dJ o Ca > V O A= N +� Q— O O> O L N N-0 N N N U- Q a' — N — >—> O Q) N N v o E 3 E (u.� � v o v t= E o s Q c CSA CB °(U V1 v v LZ (6 L U> 00 s= 0 M L o U v c v o L 0 ra ra (a Q (6 N 0 ,N U O N C v C= > u >, H p N L w 0 t= N •� w +� to >, > L L v O '� N aj M tL v 'L Q) O O O N > VI O W N C6 CSA Q ,v > L N L> C6 +' t6 '� v N v > N ZS +, -0 N O H cn Ca cn .- > +� O > E +- Q �n O N > > v °' N 4- O O L C6 O Ca VI cr N -0 c +1 C6 � ° > ° 0 Q 0 N > O O Q NN Q> ,� v U Y v U O>N LL +- O O 6 Q- C U O vI O O N V O O c Y ° O— U O �_ O N O L N N+ N O N } (6 *' 4 m N �> v N UN> V N t6 ui vO v OV LL 0 N v v O> �LY _ +, >v Ltv= > M a 4> E U O O _ U ai O v >UcGpL3 o LU a +, O mai t� p + ' LL- O > c > m- Up v> E ww L °N N O OZ Q LU 0 QJ — O>- Ci +. -&-- v a OC 4-— O a o� N a LN O (S N E a O 'o N U _ a o vo"E a' v Lo nQ > •_^o M W a - °o o O > (6 O v C�° — (a N>u CA 0 c Q 0 s= 0 (6 N .L N > > VI N N L �' t= N co N Ca Q v L- cn CLO CLO N - U O> C6 C6 U v U v --a° o> > •O N Q C6 ;A W C p a--� > v_ .> t= -0 ' t= v L.L •L N v v +•i � C6 •� •� N U N � Ca t= o N v U G > v o" C6 C6 L N N Ln Q U zs ?> p -0 O v-0 Q L -0 CL O+ t6 > Q L N N N N N U ra N >j CLO Q- J i m to 4-(D N U Ca v a--� N > Z � U N Q O> N N° •N N CC O UJ H v v E v Q U N Q v N> VI + N >O C6 L [y N Q Q O Q m Lov m nn L +� c N m -0 Q N m> -0L O +, L a O tY . . . . ° v .Q- O V~ N + N v > N CSA C>6 4- L > > vI V O U N (6 L N .v V L a N- -0 Ca N t= (�6 Q C6 N> N � L N U v CO (U } E m a(U n >o > +' c p O (U•� N N v L N N N Q N Co C C6 o L L N U N CSA v O � > LJ O-0 N U~ L N H N Q -0 > V L } Q N v _ _ V o L to Q to U (6 L ° v C v > U Q U -0 > ra v c(6V •OL •v U L t= > L O I vwwwvvV L>U (V C(V(V (Q) U > v> O -0 >Ov > N o O (V Ca cn C +, (u -0 CLo N > N U O N> V >� V O i L L .v >� LA O N (a N L N (6 N Q> >j N O O (u t= N C L Y CSA O p Co v >� _ > > N Q }, C6 C6 VI C6 'L .> O N +� to N Y N tL �n �, N O m Q �^ t= v > � +� O .v L v cn 'cn CL6 C6 N +� U >� N C6 O N UU 1 O QJ (V ti o > � `~ •v Ca C6 •UA L Q O L 4- > (V C v -0 >` U L Q- 5 o vQL > c Q t= - L O �_ O +-� i .- LJ of N = t= > � 00 > i L N cn Ca dJ N +J U > } O N t6 C6 cn E O i O vi E N 4- N N (u CLO(u _ O '> p v> cQa N Y N Q O LCo � C6 _ .� U >, ca t= O ~ U (V > Q v L vi M +- is � Q i +� Q 1 N O O O o v cn Ca dJ o Ca > V O A= N +� Q— O O> O L N N-0 N N N U- Q a' — N — >—> O Q) N N v o E 3 E (u.� � v o v t= E o s Q c CSA CB °(U V1 v v LZ (6 L U> 00 s= 0 M L o U v c v o L 0 ra ra (a Q (6 N 0 ,N U O N C v C= > u >, H p N L w 0 t= N •� w +� to >, > L L v O '� N aj M tL v 'L Q) O O O N > VI O W N C6 CSA Q ,v > L N L> C6 +' t6 '� v N v > N ZS +, -0 N O H cn Ca cn .- > +� O > E +- Q �n O N _ L v p � � •U U aJ aJ L +' � L U U L C6 Q M .L W > L 0 N O Q -0 w VI O L > L Co > +' L CLO C6 VI O (o o O U N_0 N aJ > �— p L — o +, cn w 0 N N v C > �O 4- iA V 4— > N U C a--� N - V aJ N — N L v co co co v bA 0 (6 v 0 _ v �_ L N N> +' 0 Y N > N CLOto v c�i� V aJ VI � p U C v .- Q) VI v L 0 U > nA aJ > > -P � > n0: (p L CL i C N a' VI p •L +� aJ Co +� >� 0 aJ N 0 0 +� aJ N aJ v N CL -0 p — CLO cn Ov aJ LA cn O Q) Q aJ Y co '^ i '_' U aJ 0 Co aJ C QL v O N CL CO 0 C6 `� C6 O-0 m Q 0 � G m Q) bi \ N '�, . N Ul 0 a--� L U aJ W C6 U Q) > C6 aJ c �' aJ aJ >_ p CL Co C6 V � U > N aJ 'L bA (o Q) O Q +-� Co N L L L N O 0 a--� a Y L C Y w L p N a1 U L Q O +Z C U C N � Q o ltA -0 +� v O L N N ai 0 m bb m In -0 L N (6 `� N 0 CO L 0 O C} Q> Q ai C aJ m +� N ltA C bz C M +� — aJ C b ul ul w� C6 E S N O C � O cn ai i U O ai +� aJ -0 VI N +� = ai Q 1 N U= C C C p U co .0 Q +� 0>> N O > C aJ L C6 +' co +� 0 U +� aJ aJ E J O O ,> C O > v C +' Co In O Q— O Co W O C VI G W U m aJ VI o W cc G aJ aJ `1 L +' v L CL L CL aJ L O= L CL (o aJ > L > Q Q (n Q) Q) v v � C -I--a -0> aJ C p — +- � co C 'i N >jm aJ CLO aJ N 0 aJ i CL N -0 (10 > a% L L O � c C t6 aJ oC O Q + C> + O aJ t6 V G > O -0 +� Co N V1 O U } aJ > Q N N O i > co 0 N M N v C J a) > N aJ > > v aJ aJ tLo QJ 0 0 0 C cn Y> C vaj E ai M O o- v — v +� > CL N co v C to v `� v 0O ate'' > O � N ai N ai aJ aJ aJ N C6 >` M i L N V QJ > v N aJ two ai 0 N -0 aJ c - N O aJ -0 co0 ai N O ci O t6 Q t�A C L CL > C O O m Q ai V nA C a' +� �n C to } L C N � E E ai W aj aj +, v v O .> 3 n v > N 3 O L o V Zo v 3 C L L E O N aJ 0 +, U C (6 — CSA L ai C N U 4- + j 'p L O +' N .� E L v C aJ •v p m tip t6 -0 0 U E N Co V 0 — L N Co L N N ai O VI VI Q •-, - U 0- O M U O O D C .� +� '� to E N> +, nA „ v v E C to L (o L U Z� aj v L N Q pp _0 N v v +� o ai ai W>-0 aj Q- > L Q VI >- i 0-0 m (� v U-0 L L M v v v co aJ O N v—'> > W Co (J a) . U N—E > U O w p) Ln CA Q QJ cn'N0 > � CN C C C ai t6 ca v C aJ O ai OL - 0 C aJ `� `n > F -Q C 0 C6 _ Q ai N 0 v p C p v U v C v N �i CSA > +' L 0 +' (6 (6 L a Ti Q > H '7A 7A > v Q cn co roo w U COQ -0 4- � vCi Co w • • C 0 O v L 0 E 0 4 - L Q) LU v v_ Q) > � v L o v o o o E N O N �' M aj Ln C6 C6 O v + v O 3 N O L N aj O OLU NQ� v nn v° `� Ya) Q o -0 QaiN aj -0 } OQ N +, -0 vvU M � - v v �,; �i co co Q co co +� N o L L OC v�U aJn °voo a vv C v +' H aJ C6L G >j W > aJ v N +nA m -0?> N U O +� w Q_ a) ` p X 3QL 0 O .� N W Ov M U aJ CSA aJ ai aJ O O 4 CO > OL C_ > aj U +-� W E> (6 U 4 - CO aJ N w O +' U O N N O aJ N>° c N� co O Y N Q_ m +- 4- N > O co > E OC O aJ � O w O O '� o m M M �, ai L Q_ a aj L U v E o +, Q Ln O O v>� o o O g Q- O E m s � 4 v-0 v L m +-j D -0 Vi U ai L v aj E Q_ a aj Q O L � M Q N N aj aJ N C6 aJ aJ N > H +, Lo vI O U p � nA � + U N ~ (6 N UJ e N aJ O N L O N aJ a Q o v > v L U> O N om— L QJ L OL viN +> 'OwN N °Co CLO w.wQ o v v aQj aj • • • ' LN> +,= > N o o NQ- Q_ Q_ E O > o°0 v Q Q o ° v o Q cc �� O av E U w 0 m D Q_- cr w m -0Q Qj v sQ_ L v Q r3 ai O a N O0 ai 0 aj ai U Q N L $ N O ck 4; u w0 "-- Q_ aJ v nA y U W � U cv > + o ca Q N � U O N (U -+S N E ri � o O v ai J O cU i c U +, c6 s 2 p > >OE N E v L +� Qj LOoM -0 o a io Q o '� Q u Q c � .Q o>CLO o Lo c nn Q O p 4- 0 Q vI M QJ Q U Q- L N G a--� w m Li N aj L L aJ a L a + v v X (6 nn qp +� O > v Q U *' a v w cn + aJ U +, > > p L to co -0 m CLO m U O Q O aJ Q aJ U O O N> .� v>' j Q O +' n *' Q o w0o c: >O v N 4- aJ > — `$ V i OL v Q w v N � O `� m L CLO � }> o p v co O In v a U i O L N N coo N p =O (10O °p �°° N nn U +� aJ 'v N " o>U ° c6 NU 0O N Q S � '� N w Q rz aj 4- Q, > +� w Q aj O M M L N 4- � >�- + Q _ Nv 4- U0 U M- o ' wO +- �co � �v QQ O O O M — Q O M MOCLO Q O;U 7 CL O S N U •� U U aj o 0 v, Q o v Q '� > '� w ca O 4- Q Q E Q Ln a~ 00 M Q -I-- '^ O N v rl 0 N A v v v v + O +, +, 4 > �, aj O O + n o v Q- o v + + O vL 0 0 aJ O p � � Q-0 O aJ aJ +' O i 3 H v4- O L cn L CC� N O L N N aJ p r, NO ca v ai Q ai O p nA Q Q Q u_ ai L -L 0 ai tin Q +' Q o c o O -P c o L C i`L o� N 3 O O c Q- u= v .� O N N vv v > °J n n +' > > O a, > O O v c-0 ro n -I-- �f , i J J i� J Mp c 0 CL U U U C3 a sin o° v a Q 0 0 c v C3 N U U N n3Q- v 4-j 4- _0 O Q v O nv -w O�'� -1--Q p p Q m v /, ca v4 C 4 -Z O v Q Lo v v cn Q H O v -1--Q a v -0 N N (6 L L aJO L O aj v v Q a--��' O n U Q> a O E aj v+ v vv v p o (6 E L Li C aJ QL o +� , N nA n= 4 — + c6 N N v L CO +' 4- > v 4- (6 Q O O .N v > O O v +- Q v v o o N E v o c ai v �, 3 �, p Q .� O v > v OL v L C6 v p O (6 CL , i J J i� J Mp c 0 CL U U U C3 a sin o° v a Q 0 0 c v C3 N U U N 3 v 0 0 o �^ i — -0 �-- o o N o 3 '� .L vnn Q v vC� Q (, N o- 0 O :2 Q (6 "1 0> N ,� 4- L.L > O Q N O +� L O cn N X O H o 0 v a Q- v Ln E v v m o v o O +' ° m LU ac -1--to c6 C:O ++ N v ai vv L Q ' v v 'v v O > o Q 0U co o o � v c w L E > O Q- v- o u Q- E N ^ v 't4 0 t4 O L tv S 0 0 0 m Ln °J o .Q 14 � c6 v U L nn v v ,-� +, +�^ O L O L `0 O -U v o Ln0 v � L O Qv �_ co Q O L n to v E m ^ Ln � u � '� m v OU � I �w f a� z � d Q o > c o v v E v v > o v -0 � ` v o w v v^ v 0> +, O I o 3 ,5 E o E v n L v v °' L � . � v Q) v Q } v v C a v +� O v 0 . oL V o 3 5 E � x 'v — 4- 4,5 U M 7a Co > U 0 L o v v cc coO G v C6 L + •N N N > E� v O O 4� m O O N L+ > -0 LJ v v v= N 0 — L a -- O U v � E LZ v ° O� 3 v 0 0 o �^ i — -0 �-- o o N o 3 '� .L vnn Q v vC� Q (, N o- 0 O :2 Q (6 "1 0> N ,� 4- L.L > O Q N O +� L O cn N X O H o 0 v a Q- v Ln E v v m o v o O +' ° m LU ac -1--to c6 C:O ++ N v ai vv L Q ' v v 'v v O > o Q 0U co o o � v c w L E > O Q- v- o u Q- E N ^ v 't4 0 t4 O L tv S 0 0 0 m Ln °J o .Q 14 � c6 v U L nn v v ,-� +, +�^ O L O L `0 O -U v o Ln0 v � L O Qv �_ co Q O L n to v E m ^ Ln � u � '� m v OU � I �w f a� z � d A o I � n O c a U V � x M ti A c N 3 p L `� v C Q c6 L O > v co U N N L v v m� v -0 0IlecQ o v *ac c J aJ a, 0 c° - Lo " v L c�Q v +� E n Q) v 0 > nen > v U L +� Q U L N X O QJ +� o QJ wN (6 N U pU Q) 0 Q v o • o a, cQ Ho v °' v v-0 w� > QJ O N M- It O L p0 un 3: > QDQ L +' m QJ aJ aJ > O O� O wQ VI L N E C6 ?– O O H L L CSA v Z O v +� aJ o °J " v v v Lo O cQ ajL� cr- Qj O oO m L QL Qv L Q Y aLJ O U O O `^ p M +J 2 — 61 E c � +, V� N L Q L Z 00 OM E O p Q O E Q > U U CSA QJ p C6 C6 C6 X O Y H L aJ L L a v L CSA N Q QJ N a OC aJ C6 aJ .� cv/I O cC: aj c6 L L L E 00 v n Q +� Q L L N U U U O L O +� IV L vvi c t6 co c6 c p aJ > L U N cQ (6O c . -I r -I c -I CO QJ Q U-0 m W Q L U Q Q U v Q p �_ I aJ OLo E L L L N o a, C6 H N a, N aJ X O aJ sem, aJ .v O aJ `� OQ UJ QJajt� E +' v v U (6 L C3 N N a aJ QJ QJ L O Q L V QJ Q X v aJ L E nn m `� E Q- � QJ Cr M U o aJ v v v L p �' v v O E u, �> O 0 O v E `� O Q Q O Nai L N c Q c' � L = QJ O L i6 QJ -0 O '.I.+ aJ N > C v a O C7 C6 aJ Q C6 a aJ O +� v aJ QJ > Z Q v aJ E v Q +� C i U d o N nA E E S CYC (U (L6 i -= O aJ CLO O N +� `� a N aJ Q O o J QJ Y > txo QJ L t1A aJ C7 N aJ N f6 c aJ (6 Q N N QI i +� LS >` Q - Z +, —" O C C6 U QJ E L L vI O C6 v L v v Z +i6 v v v 0 C6 Q .� Q _ aJ v v v � o � o � � E � •� n � � � o v a .� v � � � o Q 1 .� L p .� aJ QJ OC .L QJ +, O +' O N C6 C6 C6 E aJ U Lo ui (uO aJ (6 aJ > (6 Q Q Q v v L a v O QJ U� 0 c o v c v o '� c o o saJ 'G L ON �A 0CC Q—vE aJ J iv pv QJ �OoU UQJ+,O4p 0WE L = -1-- avCv6J �o o ov > o -0 E n v O aJ o o > O v nO N O O4- -J 0 c _I-_ O= C cr vv NO (6 (6 O O N O b0 c U +-� W L cn (J Q) O c N +� U aJ Q L N u •� o v E v E ~ o Q ai QJ v o C o 0 v a, 0 0 0 0 0 ai m> 0 v g 0 N N VI' v v v nA Uj CSA v L c6 a N c6 O L— 0 �O > N N CSA Q N N N N Q- O CL Q N N N N > 1 Lo (U ai L VI Q L N N N Q (V > Q L U (V N ° (V O (6 (6 O v cr 0 v N Q- = v v �; v v v v N° v Q- QJ QJ LO o c6 x ai N u s= o n nQA N j nA Q w v M N N— C00 Q- d c6 �Y J L U— C6 >� Q N N N O O E C v L Q Q nA N N- o w Q Q N •> �, Q Q v 4- QJ U Q (u Q nA L QJ Y U W N� O L N L Q ^ o N N +� VI L � m-0 Q a Q v c6 O s= s= QJ XO N O Lo N nn N •C ° ° C) s= +� c6 O N E Q v L +' o O °' v '� o `^ `^ Q- O� v v E o O -0 Q c6 `~ '� vi U cn Q zs � +- c ° v Y +-� Co CLOm CLO Q U_ ° (V Q (V c6 (u QJ QJ U Q N L c6 L U N N Q O O N QJ L m �i .v }, Q •Q Q O E Y O Q O '> N '� +� N nA L +' +' Q Q- c6 U N U N L L O QO N 0 Y O i O N N O N '� Q Q �--Q Q �j Q Q Q' c6 Y _Q d E N _ QJ v O Q- v v N Q 0 'Lo c � +� O 4J v O + O Q Q E .Q c6 Q _CO +' U o o ai N Q v Cw �_ Cw o QJ U E v Y Y U Q N U U>,c N VN N N Q CLO CLO C6 C6 L N> •L av'' i N > Q m N > > • • • • • .� �. N CO CO 4- +� N� N � L +, Q N � lD Q vi Y Q O v 4-_I-_ L> >- v v v> v N Q (6 N Z Q v of > i qp N N° C6 N O > Q CSA •� V v Q Z a Q C L > CLO Q v w `–^ �n �n d O N N> u Q- N le ML +' •N Y c6 Q v Y N N c6 W VI X m N Q aj — CL aj W Q aJ N N O Q +� c cp U Z N v 0 O s= C6 O O c G ` Q- Q s= .� °cn' s= N ° c cn O O N Q +- cin Z co 2 N (31 t6 t6 W Q ca v v N o O N aj v� o •N Q� a °' v Q v Q -0 Q t6 NLo 0 +� (U I'D O-0 +, ;n 4- +, u 1 v +- v s= �, s= v s= v v v Q v v Y v v v> v 'x v v v W p M •� m w m >. U m O 0 E N O0 v N ca N O w- L Q Q Q O U O N Q N N Q O N� Q Q L r' �^ v Q v Q M Q Z v o E ("V -M u L -L v N qj ON v N N N N Q pNj N W Q .`^ ',n QJ N (6 v c6 aJ = Cw v U +� s= c v .� v M c O Q o0 N Q `^ N U Q O Q a Q W c6 N M 4- N Y N N vI Q cv/Ico vI Q N •� Q> Q V Q Q- ° vI V N � N O M 4- Q O L V > v N -0 N LJ N N un E> p o CL o Q> v Q v° v °� O W Q cn H Q O H Q c6 aJ aJ o U L N 1 C7 L c v —_ U (V L Z U C'6 > L U Q N N a' c6 Q N N >j O >j I� O N O MIN E Q +� N cn � L cn Q- c 'QJ Q _� M Q +a Q C o M N � n > p m w� CLO Q� > v-� E 4CLO E 0 N v nn v Ln L v � co b2Q W L ; W •0 � � v U 0 nA N � t6 i 'CLO X v w Q) 3 ro ro N J MU > O CL x v I Q) v o c Q) L r v N m U E O Q Q L v � � O �n 0 N aM U Co J Q) —i LL N L L n n X v w_ = v L c6 >. Ln v o a L N L CL I v Q) Ln n L G � N vi Q) Q o N i X c QL LU v v m n U -0 t6 '} = v O +, U Q Q oN nn .� L) v 0 CO C,6 0 H W a z cc W Q W 0 a W 2 Z W cc W W H.C)- N O v O 7j a, � v v O Q —o Ln p� 7 > v CLO v v - v v `� v E � z� v w i i0 p VI aJ Q_ aJ Q' + C6 v U `� > E 0 O H> N> O O L .� N U t6 C6 0� v L -C p 4- Q aJ N n a) v� nA L 4-Q_ mO N• O v v °� o +' f v 0 '� + VI Q N v E O d +r > v � + Q_ > +� Q +' Cl O N U +� L N n3 42 Q N ai Q -0 E aJ N o N v y N 4 +, � U 4- v O E O O a n3 v v O p m Q_ L v N Q E O E LU . N L v -C n +' v o ma N N v v z vci� > L w o L E -a LZ Nt- -0 OV o ai '� v Q L o v p `n a 0L.L Q U '` vO a" O U � > r�^o>E -a •Q v (6 O�O> Lo W v F, N O v H.C)- N O O 7j a, o v O Q —o Ln p� NN —° v v - `� � z� O�o_v3n i i0 p VI aJ Q_ aJ Q' + C6 U `� N 0 O H> N> N m O L .� N U N C6 0� v -C p 4- Q aJ N n a) v� nA L 4-Q_ mO N• N N v v °� o +' f v + VI Q L v E O d +r > Q_ + Q_ > +� Q +' Cl O N U +� L N n3 42 Q N ai Q -0 E aJ N o N v y N 4 +, � U 4- Qj v Q O E n3 O p c6 +� v v + LU . N L v -C n +' co m a -- L N N v Ovv O vci� > L L a1 nU >v Ovvv Nt- -0 OV ai N NU > '` vO a" O ai ul v > r�^o>E -a m O�O> Lo W v F, N O v Op _E +- � Q Q Q} O N p L O + E ai j- ai O N C X n3 '� N O N 00 Z W Q_ aJ E > w n3 aJ O V n3 U Q_ M C7 '— cc v v X +' O L N + v L +' N Q O Q E E w v Q W C6 N C6 0 p Q_ .p +1X f6 Q_ C6 p Ov aJ N W C6 U ai > aJ O '�, +� N V i ul aJ X 'N N N C6 C Q C6 Q C6 .L Q aJ O 4 t6 v Z nn cn +, a, N> CLO +, o v C:.� n3 Q U v bA n3 Q N v L >+ N + Q N m m>> N aJ C6 N +' Q O (u O N H aJ p C6 aJ v E ai L +-� a-' Q- � i N N Q O N W 's. Q) � v v N v Q t6 Q v QJ QJ L QJ L O Q M M v QJ V U v N '� (6 lD N o aj v �Evv *IC � 0> OL 00aQvcJ > Q w QJ pWm O U W aJ o Oc + Qd_,�_�vO��ai v � 0 o 4- 0 v N N v QJ M W QM nQJ v o ° c0 Lo o v QJ o O �o o o � ° °JO+ o o v m v -Cv +' v v '� O p QJ �� Q p U Q C Q m m N� � p L v z 4n v 4 p Q CLO 0 � � c � v un ° E I, v L O w E .v L ° O U LJ 0 N U ° vI L O O U C6 O a L O L N Q) + cvi� +, Q) •QJ L Q +� QJ Q Q C6 C6 — O M + VI CLO v o vV �v o +� EQ Q 'L a- _ p v -0 W O U OjQ _ U L L X N° o ° N O- m LO v p v V +� N nn i N O > Q Q U O-0 > L U W Q a'•' Z C6 `� +, N L �--� QJ U Q L O Q) VI (6 Lo -0 N QJLo E W '� +' CLO � •�, 4- E a--� CC QJ O Q Q) V N Q •?> > m p (Q6 QJ ?� � QJ V QJ cn L CL6 VI X U +, W � � 4 � QJ N +� Q L np +, 4- 0 U� p� QJ L N Q° U p p +, � CSA QJ c Q) Q -0 QJ 4- QJ ?j (6 OU .- QJ Q c Q NJ N Q- U � (6 cn m N - N > LJ QJ p Q > p > � ul Q > +N N W Q (6 Q ?� cn L = m (6 Q4- Q- 0- 4- VQJN a) (U Q- O m � QJ E c O °wO° 0ac U3 H N rA 6 Coc6 Qv MQ+QJ 0 Q) v O v Q) Q) � � QJ o ca CL v O Ln Co C CLO QJ +� +'N - ' O QQJ v QJ O npL> (AA 4=� CJA W U N p CA U Q- U +1 CLO -C w — vO +v, v p Qv v o J � L �� �, v o Q o� +, (U v m QJ O C6 ° QJ VI O � O VI LO QJ QJ Zn+�i L QJ V1 Lr1f� Zn It 4- +� N — ci O QJ .L m QJ QJ N M _ +� _ Q � W 00 p Q — C6 C6 c -I 4- i o O +- O v t6 p QJ QJ C3 O Q Lfi 0 � QJ � Q- O C6 N N N X L } O C6 LJ mC6 O N N CSA L> Q. QJ QJ N v L ° L N X i cn +� (6 X N O (6 � +, +, 0 -0 y NC6 C6 U O ?� Q a p L N U •� O ° � O � cn QJ s= O E Q_ N QJ O N QJ lD i �_ C6 U O QJ ti QJ Q +� Q} QJ QJ L QJ QJ O O VI QJ p U .- > v N Q U p +' > > O -0 -0N _I—_ Q +- Q . � -I— q— CO Ov � v v N v Q t6 Q v QJ QJ L QJ L O Q M M v QJ V U v N '� (6 lD N o aj v �Evv *IC � 0> OL 00aQvcJ > Q w QJ pWm O U W aJ o Oc + Qd_,�_�vO��ai v � 0 o 4- 0 v N N v QJ M W QM nQJ v o ° c0 Lo o v QJ o O �o o o � ° °JO+ o o v m v -Cv +' v v '� O p QJ �� Q p U Q C Q m m N� � p L v z 4n v 4 p Q CLO 0 � � c � v un ° E I, v L O w E .v L ° O U LJ 0 N U ° vI L O O U C6 O a L O L N Q) + cvi� +, Q) •QJ L Q +� QJ Q Q C6 C6 — O M + VI CLO v o vV �v o +� EQ Q 'L a- _ p v -0 W O U OjQ _ U L L X N° o ° N O- m LO v p v V +� N nn i N O > Q Q U O-0 > L U W Q a'•' Z C6 `� +, N L �--� QJ U Q L O Q) VI (6 Lo -0 N QJLo E W '� +' CLO � •�, 4- E a--� CC QJ O Q Q) V N Q •?> > m p (Q6 QJ ?� � QJ V QJ cn L CL6 VI X U +, W � � 4 � QJ N +� Q L np +, 4- 0 U� p� QJ L N Q° U p p +, � CSA QJ c Q) Q -0 QJ 4- QJ ?j (6 OU .- QJ Q c Q NJ N Q- U � (6 cn m N - N > LJ QJ p Q > p > � ul Q > +N N W Q (6 Q ?� cn L = m (6 Q4- Q- 0- 4- VQJN a) (U Q- O m � QJ E c O °wO° 0ac U3 H N rA 6 Coc6 Qv MQ+QJ 0 W Q) v CLOv _I_ -O a) v ° — v v o n (U = >3 O v ^> v, OU L N w L v O M N +nA cwof6 ° U Q Q N aJO O Q- +' N N QE Q N v U c6 -0 Q)= aJ 2 . V � E > o O :2cn t6 > � a > w nA -0cQ6 � `� 4-C v U (Q6 � -0 aJ � . v Q-A) L a) O Q V v L a— - L 0 - v omu u n�� va Q Q aJ Q C a) O_ LA a v e aJ U c -I N ° O aJ v vi t6 D `� c: L N a aJ Q O co aJ > N U O> L E +� v E v > o O N ^ aN' aJ 4- coo Q O w O> U E Q- v> Q N Q Co tao C L Q +M Q °(Q6 Q aJ N aJ (10 Lo L > a N U L C Q CLO Q O N -a O C U O Q Q Q �O N o (10+-a) Q c6 v Q O , M v co v Q -0 � Q o U n , � aj co E .E aJ +, c6 N v Q c6 L Q oi -0v L Q Q v Q ai HQJ m ri c�i c m -s- OU wo .� H -i _ 4- L O *' L a + O N 1 Q- Q -0(6 U Q (6 OC L U (� C)- u .c O Q� Q Q -0-0 m° Q Q a v O L O Q- a — '� aJ L +� cn O *' aJ N aJ — U Q N (6 vi FCUQ- O p �O N O N c)- E (u (� Q v Q f6 N Q v Q v E +� W v U Q v 0 aJ Q cu 2- uQ Q L — m 0_-o ° v v > aJ Q w cn +, Zai cun Q- W O � v ° Q — " -0 w Ln c v Q m v } Nv o O c6 o aJ I N 0 aJ N CO V U N W d v U —O �-� o v .Q' C6 Q Q N 0 V S L N� 0 U O� cn O H aJ > Q Q Q t6 .� i Z N >' > CSA +' (u aJ O -0 o � v — CSA Lo4- — a (U Q W VI > — - 'pQ > .Q LU> 4->= m O _I_- Q m aJ o v v U v N vE Lu (u (,o C-0 v cn v U Q L� -cQ Q -I-- �E Q —J cn 4- M +1 O LL +� d U M 4- 0 M Q O (6 0 v 0 E 0 v nn v v v LU 0 N �i cid L 0 N U-0 � I , -0 1 CLO C6 U v v N v v v + Q t= O � L N -0 L.L O C6 +� Q O L VI O +' N `� = > N N O CSA O �^ N C N +, O N N (6 m N L N U N v v XLo D C6 Q v V W -0 +' N cn N > 0 07 O U i Q O v v Q QJ 7a ai O NN '� p Up p Q Q i Q- > vQ vLo C6 Q Q a--� L Lo N U = m� O L U N v v Q E L v° �' v -0o = Q- Q o E ,} 0 Lo 0 3 v Q o v E v = Q un O v o o v v 3 N N v o O N 1 a (6 0 (6 O M U N N N N n v L E a o o v 3 o v n-0 v " v ° > vO > Q m mC6 E 7 U •Lp v O ' QJ 4- E �oO A Na - 6 O L N M L N t= N .� O t= V N> +cn L •C Q Q NO +moMvO E E Q v Q N CO U 4- x CLO (u o Ln CLO Ln .� H U o O v O 0 4- 0 N LU 4-- UQj C7 H Q o �, c° o v 'Q • v c6 = =300 v > Q N -c 4-1E - w>, C6 � ca c6 ^ Q- (u Q O �n ON o N v Q 0 1•� N N Q N v Q N CU Q N L S `� o cn ° 0 v N C v v N N N CSA U aj •l= LL 0 L L N E ._ Q Q (/� + > Q N O> N N +� +� to + N N wQo o rz u v �� Q= m (U o v v v o un Q v OLU Cw N N Q -0 N Q O CL CO 0 v v E O Q 4- v U o +- Q_ +' 0")-0O o O v + + v v N 0 CU N ON o t= N O N v N v +, C6 m N Q+ L U CSA m O° _ N 'N -0'v a E M N `^ 0 L O LO > v NCWMCL v Q m dJ Q in U +' O N Q cn C Q Qjv O .� Q = E N O N Q N O N—� �O O N N Q > L '� Q N N Q L N Q- OL C6 O Q v o v Q M -0 CCON OO -1--+ > O ' OU N m E L U N E >i U Q > U Q) 4- 4- Q) +, Q 'v v v O Q E O Ln Ln v x O n Q m 0 N L�1 I Q) v N v v N L L Co -1-- °o v O c6 v nA N ,� (V v E I v v U L v° =— n of O E +' N c N ° N N -P ?: !- N N -I--cn Q- 4 •U > N V O = v c6 > _J J +1 -c6 -0 O +, � a + X N w O O L Ec6 Q N �O J _I_ Q v O M O +J (6 _ Q v + N Q •M v 0 i +' Q ttA 16 -0 to O Q N N +' v L O 'N '� v c6 vi O ?: O Q N � (D> — i E VI +, Q N L Q E 0 Q Q N p— ?� 0 O +� U 4- c6 v 0 E v Ln O •� N v N U •� -0 Q Q V O L O- N CSA N v-0 > O L +� �^ CSA U 4— U N U Ln �° Q O 4- Q v Q +' i Q 2 U) U c �O + vi > CLO `� CLO rr O o .N E N N N CLO a> 'C 4- O .0� O�- > N V N L v + Q T U L L VI +vi a--� Q a --i > , co > > a a--� c ro N N Q°Lo Lo Q N Q O� •V n° N Q v 3 U v Q o U �; v Q- v v v N p Q �' c6 v N hA N o +' p m •N QJ N v o -° o o v v N O Q 4-> U N •N C� N O CSA ap Q v v O N nA U L v v v m O>� o N QJ N L Q Q i v U � � -0o N �^ `v p cN/I � M zs O Q 4J 4J vO N L v VI � J c6 Q CSA Q Q (Q6 > � Q N c6 v +, Q U I N v o v—�� `� Q � N ai N v> X N v N �-I o 4- c6 O C6 N U =_ N Q � CLON .- Q O v N L N CLO N C6 +� +, N +, o N Q Nct� L N �O O> N N w N VIN N N� '^ a p > v N + L Q- L N °} O C5 N L cn Q a c6 L O ci ~ E ON N .v Y L QnA (6 N Q i ?: N (V O L +QL v ' N ai N v N QQ v ONp v O +' QQ ai L vN UN Q ztt � > 1 �Q Q) v •X M Jov v) >� Q o o- ' I N v L O c6 � Q (V I LL O *—' v (U � c v �; D N N W L G 4 •U V O = -X J 4O Q O _I_ 4- w v cn Q L (V •L Q O Q +J v v 0 i c6 U v E ?: O No- O � (D> v Lo +� v 4- c6 v Q v 0 o Q v p v N CSA O U v L }p Q L 4- Q ra :21 i N % 'C 4- O > -1-O v CLOc6 `~ + Q v> U E 4- N O N C E U v Q N v N o -I-- v o N p Q �' c6 N hA N •.p +' p N i QJ v 0 n v N N v _ v v v v O Q o N v v o O Q �n CSA v � � -0o N �^ Lw > p cN/I � M zs O c6 OL vO U J D W J U m i v L Q �n 0 N I O N v 'v Q) 0 Q. .N v E O Q E v v 4- G _ U v n i Q_ N Q vv) ON o O v W2 'o v > Q- v + - Q Lm " o�� O E t, Q v v v3 v `6 Q U 3 > L N > c O cn U v a --i t= C6 E v C6 Q iQ S Q v > > > U CLA (V `a (V a--� v N CSA C6 - v o u L —_ V L L ) O F,3 N N ai O v N aj O VI +� N N C > N N > +� N `6 CE6 N CL `6 U V E > v N-0> QJ uA N=, `6 = x C6 O O a Ln+ p v N Q } O Ov N U O Q t6 N ul Q)-0 N O O O Q ON +� N *' > Q U `� N O N `6 CSA N-0 E N *' cu) E L — CSA E -� CSA U O OO -0L +-j ' +- > C: O `a C >Q O +� _v aIN Lr1 O Q N +, O N Qj N N +rp U O v 0 +� c cn O a ° o `ra o � `Qa `� 3 v .Z O v L N N to O O N V U _ +� i v +�tLo OQ > N N v N N N E C W c W C `0 L w C w> S ~ Q v Q O U p L U Q_ .� v N 'U O +� � a--� p Ov bb to QL Q) Q v U E Z p f +, `a O `Qa >j Q N N o Z O o o> s N v `a 'N N O L Q i+ O>> `a `a J� J Q — U D V (6 +' L N > ' m N-0 Y O O O v �, Q a N N v O +, U U x E Y N L Q Q — a --i > � `a U 0 aN' O Ca U (U > O v Q_a C6 to p N v N > O Ca CO L '� >` � O N lA — .O C6 L `a `a +� QJ VI L p> v E> `6 L +� In D v N `a (n Q UA E O CLO aJ c L N .c v � Q Y N Q U aJ J CLO LL `a W Q_ L c `a +, v U v N •> U Co L O C L — t= — -0 to `a -0 VI o L +' > v c v U `a m o C ra Co N n- v O Q o v E p Ca L U O N '� d N >, w -a QL � E +� +' L N Oaj QJ N QJ ,w CSA N p a- E a--� (V L •- L N ° L Ca + N Q > (a ° U > — aJ LJ Q v � nA v ro `6 v +' (A v in N O vii > � ° v H .� Q +, v n ON o O v W2 'o v v nA Q +' N Q> Q nA `6 Q U 3 > L v > c O cn U v a --i N U O v 4- v - E v p > 4- S C6 d > > > U CLA (V `a (V a--� O W L - v o " �, L —_ V v o v O v N L O VI +� +' N C > N N � +� N `6 `6 U V E > v N-0> QJ uA N=, `6 = x O a Ln+ p v N Q } O Ov N U O Q t6 N ul Q)-0 N O O O Q ON +� N > o O E — 0 N *' cu) E L — CSA N CSA I — U O OO -0L +-j ' +- � C: U >Q C) Ile o _v aIN � O Qj �a IN +rp > Q) 0 a toN Qj a °> .Z O Q_ O O a c A UOL OQ N N � W NvO N `aQ S Q_ v Q U p L E 4- O LJ ,} v O d QL Q) Q v U E Z p f +, `a O `Qa >j Q N o Z H s N v `a 'N N _ C6 L Q i+ o `a J� J N — U D V (6 +' L N C6 E cr " Q N-0 v x v �, Q N Z Ca Q O v O � O-0 — a --i > � `a U 0 aN' O Ca U (U > O v vi W OC C N O v > � v 4- m� (�6 Ca N ,} O L a--� N Q- CLO � � 4- v O) v v> N .c � � Q Y N > Co .— JO J CLO LL W Q_ W � CD 6 ) � m a E \ CLO 0 $ § 2 Q _ m 7 = u w ) .[ / \ m [ ƒ ƒ 2 j 7 m COW § 3 Ln c 2 /c o % m 4 ? 3 2 U o $ m E ® 0 CL -\ /jE » a)0 Co mk / 0 -0 \ •� § / $ ± Lo q 2® 0 2 $ -I-- 2 t o E 2 / » k 2x f ƒ 20-2k uu E E» n E m n § / / i / ƒ u % v� o 4--Q-& u Q- 0 R ) n E m n u E \ ®).� k \ •2 § 2 E � n / i \ CD 6 ) � 4- aJ I N N a iN � X 4- � > aJ L aJ O N +� (U 0LLIco N Q .0 O i QJ LJ +� C6 Q H 3 ON bA aJ N aJ �_ N W E v v o v +, U N aJ LJCLO N Q O w>_ ~ ° Q N M v X `G X p —J aJ N aJ � Q U aJ Co '> O W L aJ U OJ v v aJ U aJ Q> O v C:> � Q- +1N (o Q N a � (6 � .c CLO� � � � � � aJ aJ Q � aJ QJ p O v +, N (o W a +, aJ +, O L > p L N >� Q Co CLO N O W (o aJ X >� � +' v w to -0 d Q O O +� Q N .- aJ aJ >- u L `^ aJ Q Q D aJ E Q C6 N m aJ N 0 aj W aJ Q 0 L° O � V v� Q N U U cLo v •� pC O E '� N aJ CSA .Q O v Q aJ N p U +' N v to � v to CLO LUO> nA LQ O°OQ O +N N 'H� N N >O L > +- -C N aJ Q- N+ONJtQ A O aJ LJ aJ E 0 U E Z aJv O c v �E Q w� " O :- -5 -1-- aJ E Q NvN OO o = 41 E O - .0 c-0CN6 +OU� -•0 vN LV v No v 0 + WE w v v v v > QY c 0aJ :v" v O c CLOQ (U 0 °w No� �O-0Q LJJQ�LaaJJ +� N L" U >. aJ aJ N -0aJ UO fQ6 U > c OU +' +' > CLO C � O aJ L N c a aJ co co aJ O 4- N > O W O U U N CLO o- O Q- a -•i > L L� L U aJ U W CLO v aJ O H O '� aJ Z XQ aJ N C�> +•) U LJ N •� L Q CSA v% L 4- Q N J v O S v co i o t= .� .0 �> O V L Q aJ +' V Q U aJ N> O (o QJ JO txo > aJ N LO U O aJ W m Q O um E cco aJ G > Q v '�, aJ N N > +� N nA N D Z aJ N aJ Q N N> � Q N +� Q co � aJ N Z C Lo c aJ aJ m E +, aJ m aJ Z cn LJ o i°QQ X o> a, oEm? U .cL w o vo v + O i L v O N vi aJ L `o aJ N L co > v c > aJ C: aJ U v N CLO O Q Q aJ O i co +� '� N co > �O 0 cU W Q OL CLO U Q U N aJ 4 C X cr v>� v c -I fa CLO c aJ U N > U S T, .N .— aJ Q p N O 4O W aJ '� Co > .� ON 4- N X +J O X N aJ � a f6 N C t1A t= t= aJ t= a, 'L aJ CLO ����. o- mm Qv a, s= m4- o -0J o �' �'l� O� +, L � >-a E O nnO— } ° C Q O aJ N co aJ C Q U Q U ° aJ �' N 0 co �' ai CLO ul LJ � E .N Q aJ 'N +, Q '� aJ +� O Q N L aJ Q O CSA aJ +� N Q aJ aJ aJ a t= ° aJ LA aJ O 4- Q aJ t= L L O O O U +� > U Q N aJ +, N W > aJ " +' c�i� o CLO aJ O aJ L Q > Q Q Q aJ aJ co v Q� aJ aJ Z o w W v v C M � XCLO > LU f6 Q aJ N �' 4— O L N U— a Z > N O �ai Lo_ O ca Q aJ �"� ° aJ ° •� >, a --i � O (� X v v v O X CSA > O N Q aJ L aJ (o Q W O > Q N O O N N O N E JO 4- N aJ Z v O O O LJ Q ° N 0 EL >> N nn u, a, ov E Q- C aJ +(,' -a O aJ ai U c O M aJ -C NQ UQ 4- O s= N o U +- O }° N N v NN Lo ' .- > OO ° N av NaJ W `lJv aJ -C 0O JNO X O vo O aJ ai EG) oE �_ C N Lu V aJ L N N +� Q Z ° N L v +'�, +� p O aJ N L aJ +� s= (p W +1 +, aJ w Q aJ co O N +, t= t= U i N W W U f6 t= ° Q N L +� N U O— N t= aJ i $�' O QJ C6 O 'v aJ Q aJ OU Q '�, N aJ W V > c '� aJ aJ O O O Q m aJ C aJ O U (31 � O W s= s= aJ w aJ LO Q C]A '� aJ NO +' aJ cU co CSA > 0 aJ +' � Z OU O � N Q � +' aJ to � aJ aJ aJ N N N N c U (o N N U Q aJ L +' O V v aJ aJ O O Q > X� N > X C� O > N O 4- O X m CLO 4- '� '� .� L Q m > aJ U L aJ aJ aJ C 0-12 -0 > N co U aJ — U co m A I On c O N Q) Y —� __ v v Q) N n _ v- Q O 4- O v ra O +' Ca E L ' ,, N M v > 1 Q U +O +L-, Q) N -1 a� M c a� (V Q p O v L U v L ~ M Q ai +' (V CSA — O U N N O N N v Q O a--, N v w v L O Tj N +' 4ai _ � VI ?> U > N U N N CSA N�-� > Q >, �, c +� L N L VI 0 O > N N ,� U N +�-, E +-, L-0 N U p� Q C6 O a� a� N N N. V N N Q- p c O 0 L N N N '^ E — U N Ca C6 Q U X p CSA > +� C6 1 +� U— L M *' O +' C6 W Ca 4— c O + N N ?j M V) + O C6 v ut N Q > L (V >j N N `� v O O Q Z O O L> V N N L QO CSA U >_ 3 w OL v U °= L t6 L M �' } > nn ° '-P cn V, L N Q +' v v � + v E o .� c Ca N =-0 m LA + .� N .- cr O v v ca N L O - ?� .� H> O O J $ d CLOCa M o Q >N O N N Q N OCLa >- Q O > 4- QL p N _ p N v v O N o O Q Q OV Q au CLO W v CLOv �vaNLM N p— +� L� L N Co .� C QO +' O v O v O C6 � O > '> 6O Q N (a w v CO O O C Q -0 CLO ai Q Q Q= Fj v U qp +� N m � Qai +, LVI v c +� aL Y N of W m Q Q a� N C]A v (�6 v -Q •Q O U a� O N v C]A M v N X •- } VL Vt C]A Q L L j i O J .� N +- v > `� cn �6 Q L Q L CO Q N U + t6 > t= Q O a� `^ qp CSA Q E O Q Q N N N Q +, O v LA 0 N �' O +� N D +-, • M C ra +� CSA Co Q Q c�i� N N O ZS +� v N J N N p Q CO O N m Q `~ O } N •Q L �_ v X a N p • LQ L N O Q t= C6 L np >� t= > W v vul Q N .1 CSA N +� O 1 X N O> O N CSA UA C i E Q)> a L v> m' N v 0 U O w� V v v Q> O Q = ca LJ v U m U o� m U v N O O v N> Vv L N Ca W N +' P Ca > O Q In M �; C6 In C6 > M X +' N> O N > c�i� Q- ca N N N t= L — N N Q- U (6 W O � U +-' N N Q ._ +-, (a t= O J N O +, Ln a, p Q L ``� Zo L O v v� N w t= N N N O O J +- Ud> m N t= N u) ate--, Q N a� � N0 LO aL N ai I cU m O �O � aj +1 U M U L N v +- O Q0-1-- v ai Q - Q O Q > O +� v L ut t= +, (a t= p CSA CSA N U N L Q- VI O O v> Lo > Q> N i Vf v `� — (a Ca N Q N� Ca •N N t= CL6 Q v c Q (a G CLO t= '� 0 N Q N a--, > U = VI O L O .L a� CSA a--, O +' ate--, N a"i O Q ra aJ c (a � N Q Ca N > Q ra G Q (, ut E N N w Q aw `� X Q 'vI Q 3 J +' .� Q J Q O Q X la X a' N> Q v v d v L Q N L o ca N Q W ca Q m N 2 +' CSA U +' N x N +' +� v +- O CSA CSA v N c> v a� v> (Q6 J U N OC L +� VI y Q O N N N O Q Q N .� Q N N O +-, Q Q p 0> � >� > = ate- N N S +M-, Ov �_ Q N v N v N �_ ro 0> O O } v O v +' ate- i v v .L v N .� > a� U VI W — VI a L VI a� L E - > L a� 0 N �i N Q) Y —� +' v — v v ra C. d n _ v- Q -0 v `—^ -0 O +' Ca E L ' ,, v > N > Ca Q v i• v N M c U O N LO ~ N Q ai +' N O U O N O N Q O N v > v } a✓ +' 4ai _ � VI VI U N N Q L VI > N O N U p� Q N a� a� N N N. V N N Q- O 0 t= N N '^ E — U v> LA p CSA > +� 1 +� U— L L VI C6 W L Ca Q O L (V N v Ca O v O L> +� > O Q O >_ w OL v U °= L t6 L M } > nn co N cn V, n N Q v L v `� (6 =-0 m O Q m .- cr v $ U M o Q >N O v N OCLa >- Q O M ? N p N _ O >L Q OV - �vaNLM A L O C N Q > '> 6O Q w Q - m � Qai LVI O= Cl -a EO UU :2 > m -Q •Q OO O +' N ? jQ L-0 Ca > VL Vt NQ (10v +- p teCLO M N O >CN O O v N -I- +- Cr E 0 - 0 N Q W i O N • LQ CQLCa QOQ (a NVI NN i E a m' � w� M v Q O Q = O -UW iO v O L +- Vv O NU U o O X +, N Q Q a -W p N Q SA L N > O ?> N N N t= L — N Q- O U> fa (6 W O �O im-, � U +-' N N Q ._ +-, (a t= O > J N O +, Ln > p Q L ``� Zo L W 0 N v v� N w t= o J p CSA t= N L O J Lo m N t= N u) ate--, Q N a� � LO aL J N +-, N � O U CSA U U L O Q v p N V v i Ca - Q v Q � Q OOoocwo m w L C, - N L t= a) Q- Q `� � Q V X 4 - p N CLO t= '� N a'' > U C CLOV t= N v O N Up Ca .L N W Q Q Q v aJ c Q N C�6 VI G v Q) 0— L _ a O v G W U > W > d U Q Q 2 Q '�., m +�., 2 J U 0 N �i o � � O Q nA U v p+nA 'cn c6 O ,L U O N N N-0 o � J- v v nn +, -0 > 2 c �� '� v ro Q) 4- O > N v Q• v c O v 3 v o v v Lu v N L m > m N° to M O N hA ) > N O c Q-0 4- Q + N O nA — ?� c6 c6 Q CL c N 'v m v o v H Q) Q N�> Q C v vo +, nn E o v o v .� 0 0 Q N c v v w V w o 'N o + x o E v o 4� �, O Q w -- v Do4- u v +' v v v v o txo +� Q) n CL 3 v v M+ v 0 i O -1- i v v O Q O Q QQL " O L v > O (co,- Q- -F, O-0 >� c0 Q) _ w } v N v av v o LO vU c °� c 3 L +-i N O O - 0 4- Q c6 E O> m> co) - u0 UN OV O N CLO > 4- O O � v Q> Q N c6 • V > V N Y L O N o o O E o +, v o 'v 'N v> v o ou CLO 4 - CLO Q) v W C6 cV/I u O U O Zv} vc��6 v v vii O� Q L O L L v Q- v o _+„ °J nvn ° v L ° O o X L 4 v C C)- E Q X ac 4 � v v W Q v v� -I-- v JN Q-0 Q >` N v L N O > x v nvn OQ Q> Ul m o v w H LL Y Q Q O > of X N O > W v v 0 0 o� L � v N N c6 Q v v +' O 0 O Q v L v v °c Q - Z 4- nA M > -COv -0 Q = c6 0 v v 3 VVMC West Wing CUP Executive Summary - Traffic & Access March 19, 2015 Master Plan Traffic Impact Study The Town of Vail (TOV) approved the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan in March 2015. As part of the review and approval process, VVMC prepared a comprehensive Traffic Impact Study (TIS) that addressed traffic impacts and mitigation for each different part of the Project construction sequencing. The TIS was prepared by Turnkey Consulting LLC and is dated 9-30-14. The full TIS is attached to this summary. West Wing Changes Affecting Traffic Flow & Site Access The following traffic -related changes will happen as part of the VVMC West Wing reconstruction. 1. Increase in building size. The West Wing will increase in size, but this will be mostly due to increasing the size of medical clinics that are currently in cramped quarters. There will be small increase in the number of patients and employees. 2. Reduction in the number of parking spaces in the West Parking Lot. There are currently 106 parking spaces in the West Lot. Construction impacts will reduce this to 97 parking spaces. 3. Change in the location of parking for various site users. During the early part of construction of the Campus West End, VVMC will change the location of parking spaces for different site users. Currently, all patron and guest parking is located in the West Parking Lot, which is accessed via the Main Entrance on West Meadow Drive. Currently, all employee and staff parking is located in the East Parking Structure, which is accessed via the gated access on the South Frontage Road Access. The current proposal is to swap these parking locations such that patrons & guests will use the South Frontage Road and park in the East Parking structure, and employees and staff will use Meadow Drive to Park in the modified West Parking Lot. There are two reasons for this change. First, patrons and guests will not need to drive through and park in a work zone. Second, this will reduce the amount of VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive. West Wing Traffic Impacts VVMC trip generation will increase slightly due to the increase in building size, but not all these trips will travel to/from the site. VVMC currently uses off-site parking to accommodate employees that cannot be accommodated by on-site parking. With the reduction of available on-site staff parking after West Wing construction, the overflow will be accommodated by off-site parking. So employee trips will increase slightly but some of these trips will not access VVMC by motor vehicle. If a scenario occurs where more patient parking is needed on-site, then additional employee parking spaces will be assigned to patient parking. This would create a need for more employee off-site parking spaces. Page 1 of 4 The net effect of the proposed changes are summarized below. The VVMC traffic volumes used in these calculations are based on traffic counts conducted on Tuesday, February 4th, 2014. These traffic counts represents a typical weekday at the VVMC during the peak winter season. Decrease the VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive by 19% (AM peak hour), 83% (PM peak hour), and 81% (Daily period). • Increase the WMC trips on the I-70 South Frontage Road by 11% (AM peak hour) and 230% (PM peak hour). The change in daily trips was not calculated, due to lack of data. The large decrease in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive is due to guest and patron parking spaces turning over more frequently than employee parking spaces. This is also the reason that the VVMC trips on the Frontage Road will increase. The following table provides more detail on the VVMC traffic volumes changes due to the proposed site changes. TABLE 1 - Change in VVMC Trips based on Parking Swap Based on traffic count data collected on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 (except as noted) Notes: vph - vehicles per hour; vpd - vehicles per day 1. 24 -hr traffic counts were not collected at the Main Entrance for the winter period; only peak period traffic counts were collected. The 1,325 vpd was estimated using the ratio between the peak hour traffic counts for winter and summer (winter is 35% higher), which was then applied to the 24 -hr count from August 2013 (982 vpd) to get 1,325 vpd. 2. Due to the configuration of the Employee Entrance on the Frontage Road it was not possible to conduct 24 -hr traffic counts using automated traffic recorders; only manual peak period traffic counts were obtained at this location. 3. Calculated the # of trips to/from the 97 employee parking spaces based on a ratio of 97 to 209 (46.4%); these employee trips will be relocated to Entrance with the "parking swap". 4. 275 vpd estimated based on the following assumptions: * None of the employees parking in the 97 spaces (day or night shift) leave VVMC during their shift; this assumption is based on extensive employe surveys conducted by TurnKey Consulting during the Vail MOB traffic study and VVMC staff experience * 97 parking spaces turn over once during the day shift (97 trips IN + 97 trips OUT = 194 trips) * 40 parking spaces turn over once during the night shift (40 trips IN + 40 trips OUT = 80 trips); based on all 40 night shift employees (all departme * Total daily trips to/from 97 employee spaces in West Parking Lot = 275 vpd (194 + 80 = 274, rounded up 275) Page 2 of 4 AM PM Daily Condition Access Parking Users Peak Hour Peak Hour Comment (vpd) (vph) (vphJ Main Entrance Guests & Patrons 64 147 1,3251,325 vpd estimated; see Note 1 below. (West Meadow Dr) [106 spaces] Existing Trips shown are only employee trips to/from the 209 Employee Entrance Employees 111 53 Note 2 employee parking spaces in the East parking structure; trips (Frontage Road) [209 spaces] Ito/from the US Bank Bldg are not included. Main Entrance Employee See Notes 3 & 4 below for assumptions on the trips to/from (West Meadow Dr) [97 spaces] 52 25 275 the 97 employee parking spaces. Guests & Patrons Proposed [106 spaces] Employee Entrance AND 123 175 Note 2 (Frontage Road) Employees [103 spaces] % Change Main Entrance --- -19% -83% -79% VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive will DECREASE (West Meadow Dr) (Existing to Employee Entrance Proposed) o 11 /0 0 230 /o Note 2 VVMC trips at the Frontage Road access will INCREASE (Frontage Road Notes: vph - vehicles per hour; vpd - vehicles per day 1. 24 -hr traffic counts were not collected at the Main Entrance for the winter period; only peak period traffic counts were collected. The 1,325 vpd was estimated using the ratio between the peak hour traffic counts for winter and summer (winter is 35% higher), which was then applied to the 24 -hr count from August 2013 (982 vpd) to get 1,325 vpd. 2. Due to the configuration of the Employee Entrance on the Frontage Road it was not possible to conduct 24 -hr traffic counts using automated traffic recorders; only manual peak period traffic counts were obtained at this location. 3. Calculated the # of trips to/from the 97 employee parking spaces based on a ratio of 97 to 209 (46.4%); these employee trips will be relocated to Entrance with the "parking swap". 4. 275 vpd estimated based on the following assumptions: * None of the employees parking in the 97 spaces (day or night shift) leave VVMC during their shift; this assumption is based on extensive employe surveys conducted by TurnKey Consulting during the Vail MOB traffic study and VVMC staff experience * 97 parking spaces turn over once during the day shift (97 trips IN + 97 trips OUT = 194 trips) * 40 parking spaces turn over once during the night shift (40 trips IN + 40 trips OUT = 80 trips); based on all 40 night shift employees (all departme * Total daily trips to/from 97 employee spaces in West Parking Lot = 275 vpd (194 + 80 = 274, rounded up 275) Page 2 of 4 West Wing Traffic Mitigation Due to the reduction of traffic on West Meadow Drive, there will not be a need for any roadway improvements at the VVMC access to West Meadow Drive, or the intersection at Vail Road. The proposed site changes will not significantly change the amount of VVMC trips traveling through the Main Vail Interchange roundabouts. The travel patterns will change in a symmetrical manner and this will not affect roundabout operations. Therefore, no changes will not be required at this intersection as part of West Wing construction. Frontage Road Mitigation Turn Key Consulting completed the traffic analysis necessary to identify the type and timing of the Interim Improvements on the Frontage Road in 2015. The following concept sketch for Interim Improvements was developed in coordination with TOV, because their municipal site access would be relocated slightly to the west of its current location. This improvement would create a 4 -leg intersection on the Frontage Road, which eliminates the current overlap of inbound left turns between the VVMC (south side) and TOV (north side) access points. EXIST. R/W 11 Ir BEGRE IW --7 A HOO REMOVEPOWTMN OF, _ • PRi TO DRAIN ,\ TOE OF F01 (TYP.) �.. ' ADJUST S.W. MANHOLE \\\ �, • ^ .. ; Ap11MCIPAI CENTER PARK]NG LOT * ,. \� ADVERSE CROSS SLOPE / • i THROUGH INTERSECTION/ POTENTUL REL[)CA •. RI9AN L (SAN LOW -SPEED AHI,5 ,1 • RTE / \ ` AF IX - EXTENTS \\`` L • _ OF REGRADING A ULL CROSS PANLoc LANE TION PROFILE A EXIST. l \ DRIVEWAY SLOPE 14.61 RI/RO'y w TOE OF FILL FULL WIDE ACCESS RE FACILITATE PARKING GARAGE VVMC PARKING GARAGE RO EB LANEPROFILE LOCA • .MFIL` '"n CSS Page 3 of 4 ENO PROFILEPE LANE STA. SIRUCTI WB STA I460 D • MLINI IPAL "-~_.` TrJ''FAELaAq FOR � 4 i Z The VVMC Frontage Road Access was analyzed using two different sets of South Frontage Road through -traffic volumes in order to evaluate the summer 2015 condition and the winter 2016/2016 condition. The traffic volumes IN and OUT of the VVMC access and TOV access are the same in each scenario; only the eastbound and westbound thru traffic on the South Frontage Road are different. • Scenario #1 - Summer Conditions (2013 Summer Counts forecasted to Year 2015) • Scenario #2 — Peak Winter Conditions (Year 2006 Holiday Counts forecasted to Year 2015) The traffic analysis showed the following results. • Scenario #1 —Summer Conditions The existing access configuration on the Frontage Road would provide acceptable traffic operations (delay and queuing) for the Scenario #1 traffic volumes. The Frontage Road thru volumes would be 71% (AM peak Hour) and 63% (PM peak hour) lower in Scenario #1 than Scenario #2. The lower Frontage Road traffic volumes is the reason the existing access configuration would provide acceptable traffic operations for the Scenario #1 traffic volumes. There would not be more gaps in the through traffic opposing the left turn traffic. Therefore, the Interim Improvements are not needed if the parking swap was implemented in the summer of 2015. It may be necessary to use temporary flagger traffic control during occasional holidays or other higher -than -normal traffic conditions. • Scenario #2 — Peak Winter Conditions The existing access configuration on the Frontage Road would not provide acceptable traffic operations for the Scenario #2 traffic volumes. Therefore, the Interim Improvements would need to be constructed prior to winter season in 2015. The high volume of thru traffic on the South Frontage Road means that there are fewer gaps for in through traffic opposing vehicles turning in and out of the VVMC and TOV accesses. In addition, there are other factors that contribute to the poor traffic operations in the winter condition. First, the VVMC and Municipal Site accesses are off -set by approximately 90 -feet, which creates conflicts between inbound left turn movements at both the VVMC and TOV access points. These movements overlap and compete for the same section of center turn lane on the Frontage Road. Second, with the parking swap, the left -turn volume into the VVMC Access would increase from 26 vehicles per hour (vph) to 70 vph. The additional inbound VVMC left -turns increase the chance of conflicts between inbound VVMC and TOV left -turns in the median turn -lane. Third, the increase in inbound VVMC left -turns (26 vph to 70 vph) would create westbound left -turn queues that extend back into the westbound thru lane and block thru traffic. Fourth, the increase in inbound VVMC left -turns would also cause the outbound VVMC and TOV left -turns to experience long delays (2-3 minutes or longer). This will occur because a majority of the gaps in the eastbound thru traffic would be used by the additional VVMC inbound left -turns. The Frontage Road will operate safely and efficiently during the typical (non -holiday) winter conditions upon completion of the interim improvements. It may be necessary to use temporary flagger traffic control during occasional holidays or other higher -than -normal traffic conditions. Page 4 of 4 Traffic Impact Study Prepared For: Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan I-70 South Frontage Road, just west of the main Vail interchange Vail, Colorado September 30, 2014 2533 West Pinyon Ave ^ rCnKe Grand Junction, CO 81505 rn n 970-985-4001 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................................................................... 1 LISTOF FIGURES................................................................................................................. 2 LISTOF TABLES................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 STUDY AREA.............................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PERIODS AND YEARS...................................................................................................................4 1.4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ASSUMPTIONS RELATED TO ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT.......................................................4 1.5 EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROJECT USES...................................................................................................................4 1.6 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS............................................................................................................... 8 1.7 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................... 11 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA.............................................................................. 13 2.1 VVMC ACCESSES.................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 OTHER TRAFFIC COUNT LOCATIONS........................................................................................................................ 13 2.3 PEAK HOUR DETERMINATION: VVMC TRAFFIC VS FRONTAGE ROAD TRAFFIC....................................................... 15 2.4 VVMC WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VS WEEKEND PEAK HOUR...................................................................................... 16 3 PROJECT TRIPS.......................................................................................................... 16 3.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION..................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION...................................................................................................................................18 4 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES........................................................... 26 4.1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES...........................................................................................................................26 4.2 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (BACKGROUND + PROJECT)...........................................................................................29 5 TURN LANE WARRANTS AT VVMC ACCESS TO FRONTAGE ROAD ...................... 35 6 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS............................................................................. 35 6.1 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION #1]........................................................................35 6.2 VVMC ACCESS/ TOV ACCESS ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION#2]...............................................................38 6.3 VAIL ROAD AND MEADOW DRIVE [INTERSECTION#3].............................................................................................40 7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................ 42 7.1 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION #1] ........................................................................42 7.2 VVMC ACCESS/ TOV ACCESS ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION#2]...............................................................43 7.3 VAIL ROAD AND MEADOW DRIVE [INTERSECTION#3].............................................................................................43 APPENDIX ,�TurnKe�y Page 1 "�— Com nsultin LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS List of Figures Figure1 —Vicinity Map........................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2 — Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Control.......................................................... 7 Figure 3 — Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Count Volumes ...................................................... 14 Figure 4 — Project Trip Distribution (AM Peak Hour)............................................................. 19 Figure 5 — Project Trip Distribution (PM Peak Hour)............................................................. 20 Figure 6 — Project Trip Assignment (West End — During Construction) ................................ 21 Figure 7 — Project Trip Assignment (West End — Construction Completed) .......................... 22 Figure 8 — Project Trip Assignment (East End — During Construction) ................................. 23 Figure 9 — Project Trip Assignment (East End — Construction Completed) ........................... 24 Figure 10 — Project Trip Assignment (Build-out)................................................................... 25 Figure 11 — Adjusted Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................ 27 Figure 12 — Year 2015 Total Traffic Volumes (West End — During Construction) ................. 30 Figure 13 — Year 2016 Total Traffic Volumes (West End — Construction Completed) .......... 31 Figure 14 — Year 2017 Total Traffic Volumes (East End — During Construction) .................. 32 Figure 15 — Year 2018 Total Traffic Volumes (East End — Construction Completed) ........... 33 Figure 16 — Year 2035 Total Traffic Volumes (Build -out) ...................................................... 34 List of Tables Table 1 — Existing and Proposed Project Uses....................................................................... 5 Table 2 — Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces.................................................................. 5 Table 3 — Proposed Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] ............................................. 9 Table 4 — VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] ....................................... 9 Table 5 — VVMC/TOV Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] .................. 10 Table 6 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] ................................. 10 Table 7 — Summary of Traffic Counts at VVMC Accesses .................................................... 13 Table 8 — Peak Hour Comparison......................................................................................... 15 Table 9 — Year 2014 Winter Traffic Count at VVMC Accesses by Group ............................. 16 Table 10 — VVMC Trip Generation Summary ....................................................................... 18 Table 11 — VVMC Trip Distribution Summary ....................................................................... 18 Table 12 — Compare Frontage Road Traffic Volumes.......................................................... 26 Table 13 — Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Rd ....................................... 35 Table 14 — Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018].......................................................... 37 Table 15 — Roundabout Analysis: Compare Various Methodologies .................................... 37 Table 16 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2014] ......................... 38 Table 17 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2018] ......................... 39 Table 18 — VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] ................................... 40 Table 19 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] ......................... 40 Table 20 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2014] ............................... 41 Table 21 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] ............................... 42 TI.11'17�{�Y Page 2 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction This report documents the traffic impact study (TIS) for the proposed Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan (Project) in the Town of Vail (TOV), Colorado. The VVMC is located on the south side of the 1-70 South Frontage Road (Frontage Road) about 750 feet west of the main Vail interchange. The VVMC also has access to West Meadow Drive. See Figure 1 for the Project Vicinity Map. All land use details listed in this TIS are based on the VVMC Master Plan effort, and will be updated as the Project concept is refined. Another key assumption is a future roundabout on the Frontage Road, which would provide optimal access to each of the three adjacent properties when this area builds out. The TOV has recently been working with adjacent property owners to evaluate alternative roundabout locations and to define the preferred location for this roundabout. This TIS assumed a roundabout configuration, but the roundabout solution is dependent upon the participation of all three property owners, and is based on the assumption that each of the properties will be redeveloped at the same time. Since the timing of these projects may not occur simultaneously, VVMC evaluated Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated access options that do not include a roundabout. This TIS will be updated as necessary and resubmitted for the TOV Condition Use Permit (CUP) and Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) access permit processes. 1.2 Study Area The Study Area includes the intersections listed below, which are shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the lane geometry and traffic control. Intersections #1 Frontage Road and Evergreen Access (South Leg) (Proposed Roundabout west of VVMC Access) #2 Frontage Road and VVMC Access (South Leg) / TOV Access (North Leg) #3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive �Y Page 3 cow �I.11'17�{nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS The Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection was added to the Study Area because the VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction. The increase in VVMC trips at this intersection will occur because the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. The south roundabout at the Main Vail Interchange was not included in the Study Area. The 2025 Vail Transportation Plan (Vail TMP) concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at this interchange, and discussed other system -wide improvements that would help alleviate congestion at the Main Vail Interchange. 1.3 Traffic Analysis Periods and Years The traffic analysis was conducted for the periods and conditions listed below. The traffic volumes used in the analysis are based on traffic data from the peak summer and winter seasons. In addition, traffic volumes from the Vail TMP were used for the Frontage Road. Periods • Weekday AM Peak Hour • Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions • Year 2015 — West End (During Construction) • Year 2016 — West End (Construction Completed) • Year 2017 — East End (During Construction) • Year 2018 — East End (Construction Completed) • Year 2035 — Build -out (20 -year horizon) Definitions: West End improvements include approximately 40,000 SF of medical space on and around the existing West Wing of the VVMC. East End improvements include approximately 25,000 SF of net new medical space and an expanded parking structure at the east end of the Campus. 1.4 Background Traffic Assumptions Related to Adjacent Development The future traffic volumes used in this study assume the following: • VVMC build out • Evergreen Site redevelopment, per previous traffic study for this site • No changes to the TOV municipal site 1.5 Existing and Proposed Project Uses Table 1 shows the existing and proposed Project uses for each condition. Table 2 shows the number of employee and guest/patron parking spaces for each condition. (--,TumKe]/ Page 4 Cons utting, L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 1- Existing and Proposed Project Uses Condition Year Gross Bldg Full-time Employees Patient Exam Rooms Condition Year Area (SF) (FTE) Beds Frontage Road Existing 2014 202,000 569 58 155 West End 2015 202,000 569 58 160 (During Const) West End 2016 242,000 590 58 190 (Const Completed) 107 116 245 46 291 East End 2017 242,000 590 58 190 (During Const 66 195 96 291 204 East End 2018 268,000 610 58 197 (Const Completed) Build -out Prior to 300,000 1 700 58 2601 245 2035 291 254 153 407 Const Com leted Overall Increase 49% 23% 0% 68% (Existing to Build -out) 2017 32' 153' 185' Notes: SF — square footage 1. The SF and exam rooms shown for the Build -out Condition are speculative in nature. Estimates are provided for long-range traffic planning purposes only Table 2 - Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces Note: the number of parking spaces were estimated based on schematic designs for the Master Plan effort; the final parking numbers are subject to change as more detailed design work is completed. # Parking Spaces Accessed via Total Condition Year # Parking Spaces West Meadow Drive Frontage Road Emp P / G Total Emp P / G I Total Emp I P / G Total Existing 2014 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 West End 2015 9 57 66 195 96 291 204 153 357 (During Const West End 2016 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 Const Com leted East End 2017 32' 153' 185' 02 0 0 32 153 185 (During Const) 2018 53 0 5 404 210 614 409 210 619 (CoEsat Compnedted) Build -out Prior to 5 3 0 5 435 260 695 440 260 700 2035 Overall Increase 73% 70% 72% (Existing to Build -out Notes: Emp — Employee, P / G — Patron / Guest 1. Includes 69 parking spaces (46 = P / G, 23 = Emp) at the US Bank Building that will be accessed from West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. 2. During the East End Construction the VVMC will "replace" 245 parking spaces by leasing parking spaces at nearby parking structures, and/or increasing transit and shuttle use by employees. 3. These 5 parking spaces are for service vehicles Turn�{eY Page 5 Com nsumng, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Proposed Roundabout [Int #1] (General location bas( �� n o on FHU study area) Existing 1-70 South South WMCFrontage Rd Roundabout Accessat Main Vail [Int #2] Interchange 44— Existing VVMC Main Access (to be relocated to Int #2) W Meadow Dr �' Vail Road and Meadow Dr r►nt #31 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Vicinity Map 1 w �LIr17a{{�Y Page 6 consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1 2 Not To Scale Exact location and �+}► geometry of the T Proposed Roundabout not know at this point; ~ yellow shape represents the area studied by FHU 0 1, J0.O TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 I." 800M F rootage Rd vvMc 3 ►ti,yead - ow T E Meadow Drive M 3 Ped / TronsR only �1 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Control 2 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 7 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1.6 Summary of Traffic Analysis Results The following sections summarize the traffic analysis results at the three Study Area intersections. 1.6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions of all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the completion of of the VVMC Master Plan, which is anticipated to be year 2018. Table 3 shows the level of service (LOS), delay, and queuing results of the roundabout analysis based on the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology. Turn�{eY Page 8 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 3 - Proposed Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] Roundabout AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue Approach LOS — Delay95th T sec ft sec ft (ft) (sec) (ft) West Leg A-5 20 A-9 70 (Frontage Road) C — 16 30 C — 19 50 East Leg A-6 50 A-6 50 (Frontage Road) Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 South Leg A-6 20 A-9 20 (Evergreen Lodge Access) Westbound North Leg A-6 20 A-6 20 TOV Service Access A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access Overall Roundabout A - 6 50 (max) A - 7 70 (max) (all vehicles) Table 3 shows that the Proposed Roundabout will operate at LOS A with minimal queuing in year 2018, the anticipated opening year of the WMC Master Plan. Refer to the FHU memo in the Appendix for the year 2035 Build -out analysis results. 1.6.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. Table 4 shows that the "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access and TOV Access thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. Table 4 - VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] VVMC Access is RIRO. TOV Access is % (Left -turn IN arohibited) Turn�{eY Page 9 O_fcow nsulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay95th T % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Southbound Shared Left- C — 16 30 C — 19 50 (TOVAccess) and Right -Turn Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 A — 10 105 (VVMC Access) Westbound (Evergreen Lodge U-turn A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access Turn�{eY Page 9 O_fcow nsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 5 shows that the RIRO configuration at the VVMC and TOV Accesses on the Frontage Road will operate at LOS A in the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. Table 5 - VVMC/TOV Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TO Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Proaosed Roundabout) 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue ft sec (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Northbound Right -turn A-3 45 A-8 95 (VVMC Access) (West Meadow Drive) Southbound Right -turn A-4 35 A-5 50 (TOV Access) Northbound A-8 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 10 O—fcow nsultin , LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue sec ft sec ft Eastbound A-7 50 B — 10 95 (West Meadow Drive) Westbound A — 10 55 A-9 65 (East Meadow Drive) Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 90 (Vail Road) Southbound A — 10 115 B — 11 100 (Vail Road) Overall Intersection A-9 115 (max) B — 11 100 (max) (all vehicles) T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 10 O—fcow nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 6 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End Construction). However, the traffic data obtained in February 2014 showed that the peak hour trips to/from the US Bank Building were 36 vph (AM) and 43 (PM). Based on the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection (AM = 316 vph, PM = 518 vph), the increase in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive to/from the US Bank Building during the East End Constructions is only 11% (AM) and 8% (PM). VVMC Trips on West Meadow Drive after the VVMC Master Plan is Completed After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000-1,400 vehicles per day (1,000 = summer season, 1,400 = winter season) to 58 vehicles per day (service and delivery vehicles only). The 58 vehicles per day on West Meadow Drive is 29 services and delivery vehicles that make 29 trips IN and 29 trips OUT for a total of 58 daily trips. The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. 1.7 Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 1.7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the Turn�{eY Page 11 O-fcow nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. 1.7.2 VVMC Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. The "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access (RIRO) and TOV Access (3/4 movement) thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. 1.7.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction due to the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building being accesses via West Meadow Drive. However, the increase in traffic at this intersection will only be 11% (AM) and 8% (PM), and there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at this intersection. No changes are recommended at this intersection. Turn�{eY Page 12 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 2 Existing Traffic Count Data 2.1 VVMC Accesses Traffic counts were conducted at the VVMC Accesses on the dates and times listed in Table 7. Table 7 also shows a comparison of the summer and winter traffic counts. Table 7 — Summary of Traffic Counts at VVMC Accesses Season Date AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Time Traffic Volumes (vph) Time Traffic Volumes (vph) IN OUT Total IN OUT Total Summer' Wednesday, August 21, 2013 Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:30-7:30 am 160 29 189 4:00-5:00 pm 62 94 156 Winter Tuesday, February 4, 2014 6:45-7:45 am 167 36 203 3:30-4:30 pm 108 109 217 % Difference (Summer is % lower than Winter) 7% 28% Notes: vph — vehicles per hour 1. The peak hour data shown is for highest peak hours of the two days that were counted Table 7 shows that the winter season peak hour traffic volumes were higher than the summer season. Therefore, the traffic data collected on February 4, 2014 was used for this TIS. 2.2 Other Traffic Count Locations In addition to counting the traffic IN and OUT at the VVMC Accesses, the movements and intersection listed below were also counted. Figure 3 shows the existing year 2014 peak hour traffic volumes at these locations. The Appendix contains the peak hour traffic count data at all locations. • Frontage Road thru movements at the VVMC Access • Traffic IN and OUT at the TOV Access • Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 13 Com nsuivng, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS ii Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Evergreen Lodge Access \O ` 1 TOV West Access VVMC 20 ` 76 i , `► 44 71 11 18 16 15 This intersection was counted to determine the overall trips to/from VVMC, but was not included in the intersection analysis. 0 TOV Main Access 2 I-70 $00 F rootage Rd � fead /�2�8Oly 3 3 0 L 4 0 12Lj L_ 4 7 10 10 0 18 9 01Ir0 2 4 60 2 151 2 3 5\ 2 5j I 13 39 193 2� i � 5 359 11� 84 9 318 26 2 29/ Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Count Volumes Main Vail 0 265 274 E Meadow Drive 3 Ped /Transit Only Figure 3 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 14 Com nsultinr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 2.3 Peak Hour Determination: VVMC Traffic vs Frontage Road Traffic The AM and PM peak hours for the VVMC traffic and the Frontage Road thru traffic were calculated separately to see if had the same peak hour. Table 8 shows a comparison of the peak hours. The Appendix contains more detailed peak hour calculations. Table 8 — Peak Hour Comparison Time Peak Period Traffic Volumes vehicles per hour (vph) VVMC Traffic 1-70 South Frontage Road All Accesses At VVMC Access IN OUT Total WB Thru EB Thru Total AM Peak Period 6:30-730 am 149 28 177 1 117 136 72 79 189 215 7:00-8:00 am 154 36 190 180 110 290 7:15-8:15 am 7:30-8:30 am140 150 42 192 42 182265 235 151 193 386 458 PM Peak Period 3:00-4:00 pm 98 84 182 249 315 564 3:15-4:15 pm 1 14pm 102 97 199 270 278 340 350 610 628 3:45-4: 94 86 115 209 121 207 278 351 629 4:15-5: 79 123 202 279 341 620 4:30-5:30 pm 65 127 192 267 320 587 4:45-5:45 pm 63 143 206 246 294 540 5:00-6.00 pm 66 143 209 223 272 495 Table 8 shows that the peak hours for the VVMC traffic and Frontage Road traffic are different. Below are observations about each peak period. AM Peak Hour The VVMC and Frontage Road peak hours only overlap by 15 minutes. VVMC traffic during the Frontage Road peak hour is 10% lower than during the VVMC peak hour (203 vph vs 182 vph). Frontage Road traffic during the VVMC peak hour is 53% lower than during the Frontage Road peak hour (458 vph vs 215 vph). Because the Frontage Road traffic is so much lower during the VVMC peak hour (458 vph vs 215 vph), the traffic volumes during the Frontage Road peak hour were used for the AM peak hour. �, Tq 1 Key Page 15 J -- -�I "�— cow nsult n , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS PM Peak Hour The VVMC and Frontage Road peak hours overlap by 30 minutes. VVMC traffic during the Frontage Road peak hour is 5% lower than during the VVMC peak hour (217 vph vs 207 vph). Frontage Road traffic during the VVMC peak hour is 0.8% lower than during the Frontage Road peak hour (633 vph vs 628 vph). Because the Frontage Road peak hour is essentially the same during the VVMC peak hour (633 vph vs 628 vph), the traffic volumes during the VVMC peak hour were used for the PM peak hour. 2.4 VVMC Weekday Peak Hour vs Weekend Peak Hour The traffic volumes discussed in Sections 2.1-2.3 were collected during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The weekday represents the peak for the VVMC because the VVMC operates at full capacity with all clinics open on weekdays. On the weekend, the VVMC has significantly less trips because the clinics are closed and VVMC operates with reduced and staff and doctors. 3 Project Trips 3.1 Project Trip Generation The Project trip generation is based on the existing winter season traffic counts at the VVMC Accesses and the existing and future VVMC land use and parking spaces. Table 9 summarizes the existing traffic counts at the VVMC Accesses by group — employees and guests / patrons. Table 9 — Year 2014 Winter Traffic Count at WMC Accesses by Group Peak Hour Main Access (W Meadow Dr) Service Access (W Meadow Dr) Employee Access (Frontage Road) US Bank Bldg Access (Frontage Road Total IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT Guest/ Patron Trips AM 44 20 --- --- --- --- 5 0 49 20 PM 71 76 --- --- --- --- 5 2 76 78 Employee Trips AM --- --- 1 1 61 19 29 2 91 22 PM --- --- 2 2 5 18 25 11 32 31 The steps listed below were used to calculate the VVMC trip generation for each condition. The trip generation for Guests / Patrons and Employees were calculated separately, and then combined at the last step. The Appendix contains the detailed trip generation calculations. Guest / Patron Trip Generation Calculations Step #1 Calculated the percent change in Patient Beds, Exam Rooms, and Guest / Patron Parking Spaces from one condition to the next. �rTumKeY,, Page 16 \'- __-,"Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS The Patient Beds did not change for any condition so it was disregarded. Due to the limited Parking Spaces at the VVMC, the trip generation is more dependent upon the availability of Parking Spaces than the increase in Exam Rooms. Therefore, the percent change in trip generation for each condition was directly correlated to the percent change in Guest / Patron Parking Spaces. Step #2 Increased the trips to/from the VVMC by the percent change in Parking Spaces from Step #1. Step #3 Allocated the trips to/from the VVMC for each condition based on the percent of parking spaces accessed via West Meadows Drive or Frontage Road. Employee Trip Generation Calculations Step #1 Calculated the percent change in FTE's and Employee Parking Spaces from one condition to the next. Due to the limited Employee Parking Spaces at the VVMC (some employees have to park off-site now), the Employee trip generation is dependent upon the availability of Employee Parking Spaces, and not the increase in FTE's. Therefore, the percent change in trip generation for each condition was directly correlated to the percent change in Employee Parking Spaces. Step #2 Increased/decreased the trips to/from the VVMC by the percent change in Parking Spaces from Step #1. Step #3 Allocated the trips to/from the VVMC for each condition based on the percent of parking spaces accessed via West Meadows Drive or Frontage Road Combine Guest / Patron and Employee Trips Step #4 The number of Patron / Guest and Employee trips were combined to get the total trips to/from the VVMC on West Meadow Drive, and Frontage Road for each condition. Table 10 shows a summary of the VVMC trip generation. The "Trip Generation Calculations" table in the Appendix shows the detailed trip generation calculations. �I.11'17�{�Y Page 17 cow nsultinr ,-L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 10 - VVMC Trip Generation Summary 3.2 Project Trip Distribution The Project Trip Distribution was based on the existing traffic counts at 1) the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road, and 2) Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection. Table 11 shows the trip distribution percentages at these two locations. The Project Trip Distribution is the same in all conditions. Table 11- WMC Trip Distribution Summary Trip Distribution for VVMC Trips VVMC Peak Hour Trips (vph) West Meadow DriveFrontage West Meadow Drive Road Condition Year AM Pk Hr PM Pk HrEAMPk Hr PM Pk Hr To the East I (NB RT) To the West (NB LT) From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) IN Out Tot IN Out Totut 15% 100% I Tot IN Out Tot Existing 2014 45 21 66 73 78 151 95 21 116 35 31 66 West End 2015 21 8 29 29 30 59 101 30 131 73 73 146 (During Const) West End 2016 37 15 52 54 56 110 103 27 130 54 53 107 (Const Completed) East End 2017 60 23 83 80 82 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 (During Const) East End 2018 2 0 2 1 1 2 212 62 274 155 156 311 (Const Completed) Build -out Prior to 2 0 2 1 1 2 239 72 311 183 186 369 2035 3.2 Project Trip Distribution The Project Trip Distribution was based on the existing traffic counts at 1) the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road, and 2) Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection. Table 11 shows the trip distribution percentages at these two locations. The Project Trip Distribution is the same in all conditions. Table 11- WMC Trip Distribution Summary Figures 4 (AM Peak) and 5 (PM Peak Hour) show the Project Trip Distribution. Figures 6 thru 10 show the Project Trip Assignment. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 18 Com nsulting, LLC Trip Distribution for VVMC Trips Frontage Road West Meadow Drive Peak Hour Inbound Tris Outbound Tris Inbound Tris Outbound Trips From the East (WB LT) From the West (EB RT) To the East I (NB RT) To the West (NB LT) From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) To the South (EB RT) AM 90% 10% 85% 15% 100% 0% 90% 10% PM 75% 25% 95% 5% 95% 5% 95% 5% Figures 4 (AM Peak) and 5 (PM Peak Hour) show the Project Trip Distribution. Figures 6 thru 10 show the Project Trip Assignment. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 18 Com nsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS X = Inbound Traffic % Y = Outbound Traffic % Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Distribution - AM Peak Hour (Same for all Conditions) I 4 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 19 cow nsultin , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS X = Inbound Traffic % Y = Outbound Traffic % 0% 5% Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Distribution - PM Peak Hour (Same for all Conditions) I 5 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 20 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (West End - During Construction) I 6 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 21 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (West End - Construction Completed) I 7 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 22 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (East End - During Construction) I 8 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 23 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (East End - Construction Completed) I 9 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 24 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (Build -out) I 10 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 25 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 4 Existing and Future Traffic Volumes The following sections describe the existing, future background, and total traffic volumes. The Appendix contains tables that show the traffic volumes at the Study Area intersections. 4.1 Background Traffic Volumes 4.1.1 Frontage Road Traffic Volumes 4.1.1.1 Existing Year 2014 The existing year 2014 Frontage Road traffic volumes are based on the traffic counts conducted in February 2014. The Frontage Road traffic volumes from the February 2014 traffic count were compared to the traffic volumes from 1) the 2009 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Vail TMP), 2) the Vail MOB TIS prepared in November 2012 by Turn Key Consulting, and 3) the MOB and Municipal Center Roundabout Analysis memo prepared in October 2012 by FHU. Table 12 shows the traffic volume comparison. Table 12 — Compare Frontage Road Traffic Volumes Peak Year 2006 Year 2014 Year 2014 Year 2025 Year 2032 Hour Direction (Vail TMP) (Calculated) (traffic count (Vail TMP) (TOV Info) (Note 1) in Feb 2014) EB 395 475 193 605 AM Not included in WB 585 704 265 880 Vail TMP Total 980 1,178 458 1,485 EB 815 980 359 1,202 1,160 PM WB 600 722 274 992 985 Total 1,415 1,701 633 2,194 2,145 Notes: 1. The year 2014 Frontage Road traffic volumes were calculated using a straight-line growth between the years 2006 and 2025 traffic volumes in the Vail TMP. The annual growth rate (AGR) between years 2006 and 2025 traffic volumes in the Vail TMP was 2.34% per year. Table 12 shows that the year 2014 traffic counts are 62% lower than the year 2014 traffic volumes calculated using the years 2006 and 2035 traffic volumes from the Vail TMP. In addition, the 2014 traffic counts are 54% lower than the year 2006 traffic volumes from the Vail TMP. Because of the significant difference between traffic volume sources, the Frontage Road traffic volumes based on the Vail TMP were used so that this TIS is consistent with the Vail TMP. The traffic volumes in the Vail TMP are based on traffic data "collected over a variety of times including the Christmas holiday, Martin Luther King weekend, Presidents Day weekend, and Spring Break times in 2005 and 2006." (Page 4 of the Vail TMP). Figure 11 shows the adjusted year 2014 traffic volumes. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 26 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Evergreen Lodge Access /i,1 1 3 5 1 2 5 13 ��� 2 1 39 423 2 662 475 2� 5 704 920 ~ 652 980 ~ 722 \25 � 47 11� 84 � I 75 9 I 26 16 I 64 3 I 18 4 69 2 29 1 \TOV West Access VVMC 3 143 �65 1030 28 88� 1 4 0 12 LI t 4 7 10 10 3--1 0 18 9 0� 0 2 4 60 2 151 '� d `ft TOV Main Access 2 1 1-70 South F rontags Rd W Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive I 3 pad / Tren8lt Only Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Adjusted Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 11 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 27 Com nsulvnr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 4.1.1.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018 The 2.34% AGR (refer to Note 1 of Table 12) was applied to the year 2014 traffic volumes from the Vail MOB TIS to calculate the Frontage Road traffic volumes in years 2015-2018 and 2035. 4.1.1.3 Future Year 2035 FHU, who prepared the Vail TMP, stated in an email to the TOV that a 0.5% AGR could be used to forecast traffic growth from year 2025 to year 2034. The 0.5% AGR was applied to the year 2025 Frontage Road traffic volumes in the Vail TMP to estimate year 2035 Frontage Road traffic volumes. The Appendix contains the email from FHU to the TOV. The 0.5% AGR from 2025 to 2034 has been recommended by FHU and the TOV since the Vail TMP is based on the assumption that Vail will reach build -out by 2025. It has been recommended that after build -out only this modest growth rate be applied. It also should be noted that with the recent economic downturn and slowing of development in Vail, it is unlikely Vail will see build out in 2025 and potentially it will extend beyond 2034. Thus it is likely that the total traffic growth projected for this study is very conservative. 4.1.2 TOV Traffic Volumes (Main Access) 4.1.2.1 Existing Year 2014 The traffic volumes to/from the main access to TOV Municipal Building (TOV Main Access) on the Frontage Road were counted during the February 2014 traffic counts. These traffic volumes were used without any modifications. 4.1.2.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The year 2014 traffic volumes to/from the TOV were assumed to stay the same in all future year scenarios. There have been several proposed projects on the north side of the Frontage Road (including a parking structure for the VVMC) that would significantly increase the traffic volume at the TOV Access. At this point the traffic volumes at the TOV Access do not include any future development on the TOV property. 4.1.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive Traffic Volumes 4.1.3.1 Existing Year 2014 The traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection were counted during the February 2014 traffic counts. This intersection was not included in the Vail TMP so it was not possible to see how the February 2014 traffic counts compared to the Holiday traffic counts in the Vail TMP. Therefore, these traffic volumes were used without any modifications for year 2014. �Y Page 28 Com �I.11'17�{nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS 4.1.3.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The background traffic volumes (all movements except those to/from West Meadow Drive) at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection were increase by 0.5% AGR to years 2015 thru 2018 and 2035. The 0.5% AGR is based on the area served by this intersection is already developed, but traffic will still probably see modest growth over time as noted by FHU in the email to the TOV referenced in Section 4.1.1.3. 4.1.4 Evergreen Lodge Traffic Volumes 4.1.4.1 Existing Year 2014 The Evergreen Lodge is located on the south side of the Frontage Road immediately west of the VVMC. If the Proposed Roundabout is constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC / TOV Access, the south leg of the Proposed Roundabout could be the Evergreen Lodge access. Because of this, the traffic volumes to/from the Evergreen Lodge were estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Fox Higgins prepared a traffic study in year 2008 for the proposed redevelopment of the Evergreen Lodge. The Fox Higgins traffic study was based on the Evergreen Lodge expanding from 128 units (128 hotel rooms) to 230 units (139 hotel rooms and 91 condos). Even though the redevelopment has not occurred yet, the year 2014 traffic volumes at the Evergreen Lodge were based on the proposed redevelopment from the Fox Higgins traffic study. The trips to/from the Evergreen Lodge were distributed using the same trip distribution percentages calculated at the VVMC Frontage Road access. The Appendix contains select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study, and the Evergreen Lodge trip generation and distribution calculations. 4.1.4.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The year 2014 traffic volumes to/from the Evergreen Lodge were assumed to stay the same in all future year scenarios. 4.2 Total Traffic Volumes (Background + Project) Total traffic volumes are the sum of project traffic and background traffic. The Appendix contains tables that show the total traffic volumes at the Study Area intersections. Figures 12 thru 16 show the total traffic volumes. �I.11'17�{�Y Page 29 Com nsultinr ,-L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 2 433 1� 680 952 671 25 1 I I 75 16 I 64 4 69 1 TOV West ,�< Access Evergreen Lodge TOV Main Access Access 2 f VVMC 3 7144 /41 104 0 16 47�4 0 78� 4 7 10 10 2� � 0 18 7 0� 1 I 0 2 1 60 2 152 '\ ft 0 See Note Below 3 5� 2 5j I 13,' 39 2 5 486 � 720 1003739 \1 0� 91 18 55, 5 26 4 69 South Fronts _ go Rd W NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive I 3 a.d / Translt only Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Year 2015 Total Traffic Volumes (West End - During Construction) 12 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 30 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 2 444 1� 696 971 687 12� 47 \25 � 75 16 I 64 4 69 3 144 /57 104 0 23 70�4 0 102 4 7 10 10 0 18 8 00 2 3 61 2 153 '� ft 0 South Fronts _ 9e Rd W 2 See Note Below 3 5 2 5� '13,,'39 2 5 497 � 737 1026 756 10� 14 4� 3 I 50 NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive I 3 pad / TrenSlt Only Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure Year 2016 Total Traffic Volumes (West End - Construction Completed) 13 �I.11'17rf{�Y Page 31 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 1 1� 2 \�, 446 709 981702 12� � 47 \�25 I 75 16 I 64 4 69 —N\jSee Note Below 3 5 5� �1339 509 2� 5 754 1050 774 VVMC Access �I.11'17�{�Y Page 32 Com nsul nr , LLC TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 1'70 South Fronto 9e Rd vvMc 0 3 h�,yeaa _ 145 80 105 0 �/�ve ' 1 30 0 8 95� � � 4 4 Meadow Drive E L 7 10 1018 NOTE 3 Ped /Tronslt only 3e� 2 This movement will have to make a U- � turn at the Proposed Roundabout west 0 0 of the VVMC Access when the TOV 4 61 2 153 Access is converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Figure 14 Year 2017 Total Traffic Volumes (East End - During Construction) �I.11'17�{�Y Page 32 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 479 1� 2 736 1045 728 12� 47 25 16� I 75 I 64 4 69 1 TOV West Access Evergreen Lodge TOV Main Access Access 2 I VVMC '� ft 0 2 See Note Below 3 5 2 5 ���5 X13; 521 772 1075 792 21� �191� 39 9� 153 X116; 8 I 148 South Fronta _ 9a Rd W NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Main Vail Interchana 0 11 E Meadow Drive I 3 ved / Traly nsit On Year 2018 Total Traffic Volumes (East End - Construction Completed) Figure 15 �I.11'17rf{�Y Page 33 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend X =AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 606 1� 2 920 1263 985 1 "' 47 25 � I 75 16 I 64 4 69 3 159 24 114\4� 22 10 55�—t 4 11 0 20 6 �Tro 67 2 168 '� ft 0 South Fronts _ 9e Rd W See Note �,\A Below 4 7` 10� 22, 3 54 25� 60 644 953 1263 1043 \24� 215; 46 ',137, 11 61 9 177 NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Year 2035 Total Traffic Volumes (Build -out) Main Vail Interchana 0 E Meadow Drive 3 vd / Trenslt Only Figure 16 �I.11'17rf{�Y Page 34 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 5 Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Road The need for turn lanes on the Frontage Road at the VVMC Access is based on the requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC). Table 13 shows the required turn lanes per the SHAC. Table 13 — Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Rd Table 13 shows that an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane (EB RT Decel Lane) will be required at the VVMC Access to the Frontage Road. The EB RT Decel Lane was included in the roadway configuration for the traffic analysis discussed in the next section. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations was analyzed at the three Study Area intersections. The following sections describe the analysis and results for each Study Area intersection. 6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC Access was analyzed using the FHWA Roundabout Methodology, which utilizes the methods and calculations in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). In addition to the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, the SIDRA Roundabout Methodology was used to validate the results of HCM 2010 Roundabout analysis and provide a range of analysis results. SIDRA is a computer software program that can analyze Roundabouts using Turn�{eY Page 35 Com nsul nr , LLC Total 2035 Volume (vph) CDOT Turn Lane Warrants Lane Turn Lane (Based on higher F -R Access Classification Warranted? traffic volume of AM Speed Limit = 25 mph or PM peak hour Right -IN Right -OUT (RIRO) Access (Left -turn IN and Out Prohibited) WB Left -turn Deceleration Lane Movement will be Prohibited (inbound) Traffic will make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access EB Right -Turn Deceleration Lane Right -Turn IN More than 50 vph YES (inbound) DHV = 239 NB -WB Left -Turn Acceleration Lane Movement will be Prohibited (Outbound) Traffic will make a U-turn at the Existing Roundabout at the Main Vail Interchange NB -EB Right -Turn Acceleration Lane Right -Turn OUT Not required on multi -lane No (outbound) DHV = 186 highways of this category Table 13 shows that an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane (EB RT Decel Lane) will be required at the VVMC Access to the Frontage Road. The EB RT Decel Lane was included in the roadway configuration for the traffic analysis discussed in the next section. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations was analyzed at the three Study Area intersections. The following sections describe the analysis and results for each Study Area intersection. 6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC Access was analyzed using the FHWA Roundabout Methodology, which utilizes the methods and calculations in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). In addition to the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, the SIDRA Roundabout Methodology was used to validate the results of HCM 2010 Roundabout analysis and provide a range of analysis results. SIDRA is a computer software program that can analyze Roundabouts using Turn�{eY Page 35 Com nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS either 1) the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, or 2) the SIDRA Methodology. The Roundabout analysis was conducted twice for each Methodology, once with the "Default" factors and parameters, and a second time with factors and parameters approved by CDOT and FHWA as part of the System Level Study for the Wolcott traffic study, including: • Critical Gap = 4.05 seconds • Follow Up Headway = 2.50 seconds Proposed Roundabout Location and Configuration The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. The following sections describe the Interim and Build -out conditions, and Roundabout analysis results. 6.1.1 Interim Condition [Year 2018 — Completion of the WMC Reconstruction] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, which is anticipated to be year 2018. Table 14 shows the LOS, delay, and queuing results of the roundabout analysis based on the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology. Table 15 compares the results from the HCM 2010 and SIDRA Roundabout analyses methodologies. The Appendix contains the Roundabout analysis output. Turn�{eY Page 36 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 14 - Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] Roundabout Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LO S — Delay (sec) 95th % Queue (ft) LOS — Delay (sec) 95th % Queue (ft) (FHWA-Approved (Default Factors (Default Factors Approach pp Factors & Parameters) West Leg (Frontage Road) A-5 20 A-9 70 East Leg (Frontage Road A-6 50 A-6 50 South Leg (Evergreen Lodge Access) A-6 20 A-9 20 North Leg TOV Service Access A-6 20 A-6 20 A-7 A-2 (Frontage Road) Overall Roundabout all vehicles A - 6 50 (max) A - 7 70 (max) Table 15 - Roundabout Analysis: Compare Various Methodologies T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 37 cow nsul nr , LLC HCM 2010 SIDRA HCM 2010 SIDRA Roundabout (FHWA-Approved (FHWA-Approved (Default Factors (Default Factors Approach pp Factors & Parameters) Factors & Parameters) & Parameters) & Parameters) LOS — Delay (sec) Year 1 AM Peak West Leg A-5 A-2 B-11 A-2 (Frontage Road East Leg A-6 A-2 A-7 A-2 (Frontage Road) South Leg A-6 A-6 B-10 A-6 (Evergreen Lodge Access North Leg A-6 A-7 B-10 A-7 (TOV Service Access) Overall Roundabout A— 6 A-2 A-9 A-2 Lail vehicles Year 1 AM Peak Hour Leg A-9 A-2 C-22 A-2 (Frontage Road) East Leg A-6 A-2 A-6 A-2 (Frontage Road) South Leg A-9 A-7 C-18 A-7 (Evergreen Lodge Access) North Leg A-6 A-7 A-10 A-7 TOV Service Access Overall Roundabout A— 7 A-2 B-15 A-2 (all vehicles) T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 37 cow nsul nr , LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 6.1.2 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] Refer to the FHU memo for the year 2035 Build -out analysis. 6.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The VVMC Access on the Frontage Road was analyzed using Synchro and SimTraffic software, which is based on the HCM 2010. The analysis included the TOV Site Access as the north leg of the intersection. The following sections describe the Existing, Interim, and Build -out conditions analysis results. 6.2.1 Existing Condition [Year 2014] This analysis is based on the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access. Table 16 shows the analysis results for the Year 2014 Existing Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 16 — WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2014] 6.2.2 East End (Construction Completed) [Year 2018] VVMC has been working from the assumption that a roundabout would be constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC access. That assumption is based on the premise that adjacent properties will redevelop and provide the right-of-way necessary to construct the proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. If the adjacent properties do not redevelop such that the proposed roundabout can not be constructed prior to the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, the VVMC needs an access option that would work in the interim condition prior to the construction of the proposed roundabout. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The following sections describe the possible scenarios that could occur in year 2018 at the completion of the VVMC Master Plan. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 38 Com nsulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound Left -turn A-6 20 A-5 20 (Frontage Road) Westbound Left -turn A-3 50 A-9 40 (Frontage Road) Northbound Left -turn D — 31 40 E — 46 50 Right -turn A-3 A-5 (VVMC Access) Southbound Left -turn C — 18 20 C-23 35 Right -turn B — 12 A-8 (TOVAccess) 6.2.2 East End (Construction Completed) [Year 2018] VVMC has been working from the assumption that a roundabout would be constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC access. That assumption is based on the premise that adjacent properties will redevelop and provide the right-of-way necessary to construct the proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. If the adjacent properties do not redevelop such that the proposed roundabout can not be constructed prior to the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, the VVMC needs an access option that would work in the interim condition prior to the construction of the proposed roundabout. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The following sections describe the possible scenarios that could occur in year 2018 at the completion of the VVMC Master Plan. T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 38 Com nsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 6.2.2.1 Existing Roadway Configuration on the Frontage Road The VVMC Access on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) scenario using the existing roadway configuration. Table 17 shows what can be expected at the VVMC Access if Frontage Road improvements (proposed roundabout or "First and Alone" alternative) are not constructed prior to the completion of the East End of the VVMC Campus. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 17 - WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2018] Existina Roadway Confiauration 6.2.2.2 "First and Alone" Alternative As stated in the introduction to Section 6.2.2, VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". These improvements are listed below. The Appendix contains a sketch of the "First and Alone" alternative. The "First and Alone" alternative was analyzed using year 2035 traffic volumes to see how it would operate beyond the completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018. Table 18 shows the results of the "First and Alone" alternative analysis. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. "First and Alone" Alternative Improvements on the Frontage Road • Construct a raised median on the Frontage Road that: o Converts the VVMC Access to RIRO, with a break in the raised median so that emergency vehicles can make a left -turn into VVMC. o Converts the TOV Access to 3/4 with a left -turn acceleration lane for outbound left -turns; the left -turn IN will be prohibited. • Construct an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane at the VVMC Access (per requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code — see Table 13) • Construct a bulb -out at the Evergreen Lodge Main Access that would accommodate westbound to eastbound U-turns. Turn�{eY Page 39 Com nsultinr ,_L L C AM Peak HourPM -- ak Hour mm LOS — Delay 95 th % Queue LOS — Delay 95 th % Queue -. -. Eastbound _ 1 Due to the high volume of EB thru (Frontage -,., traffic (1,075 vph), there will be very _ • " 1 few gaps for WB into the VVMC, left -turns (116 vph) in (Frontage Road) 1 the WB left -turns thru traffic on the which will result blocking the WB Frontage Road. Northbound - F — 57 Access) 1 The WB thru queue will probably _ extend back to the Roundabout at (TOVAccSouthbound - 1 the Main Vail interchange "grid -lock" in that and cause Roundabout. _ • 6.2.2.2 "First and Alone" Alternative As stated in the introduction to Section 6.2.2, VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". These improvements are listed below. The Appendix contains a sketch of the "First and Alone" alternative. The "First and Alone" alternative was analyzed using year 2035 traffic volumes to see how it would operate beyond the completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018. Table 18 shows the results of the "First and Alone" alternative analysis. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. "First and Alone" Alternative Improvements on the Frontage Road • Construct a raised median on the Frontage Road that: o Converts the VVMC Access to RIRO, with a break in the raised median so that emergency vehicles can make a left -turn into VVMC. o Converts the TOV Access to 3/4 with a left -turn acceleration lane for outbound left -turns; the left -turn IN will be prohibited. • Construct an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane at the VVMC Access (per requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code — see Table 13) • Construct a bulb -out at the Evergreen Lodge Main Access that would accommodate westbound to eastbound U-turns. Turn�{eY Page 39 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 18 - WMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] VVMC Access is RIRO. TOV Access is % (Left -turn IN arohibited) 6.2.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] The year 2035 Build -out Condition includes proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. Table 19 shows the analysis results for the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 19 - WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TOV Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Pronosed Roundabout) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Southbound Shared Left- C — 16 30 C — 19 50 TOVAccess and Right -Turn Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 A — 10 105 (VVMC Access) Westbound (Evergreen Lodge U-turn A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access 6.2.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] The year 2035 Build -out Condition includes proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. Table 19 shows the analysis results for the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 19 - WMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TOV Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Pronosed Roundabout) 6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End CmT�I.11'17�{eY Page 40 Consulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Northbound Right -turn A-3 45 A-8 95 VVMC Access Southbound Right -turn A-4 35 A-5 50 TOV Access 6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End CmT�I.11'17�{eY Page 40 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Construction). However, the traffic data obtained in February 2014 showed that the peak hour trips to/from the US Bank Building were 36 vph (AM) and 43 (PM). Based on the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection (AM = 316 vph, PM =518 vph), the increase in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive to/from the US Bank Building is only 11% (AM) and 8% (PM). The Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection was analyzed using Synchro and SimTraffic software, which is based on the HCM 2010, to compare the existing Condition to the East End (During Construction) to show the impact of using West Meadow Drive to access the US Bank Building parking. After the East End parking structure is completed, the VVMC main access will be on the Frontage Road. Except for service vehicles, all VVMC trips will use the new VVMC main access on the Frontage Road. The following sections describe the Existing, Interim, and Build -out conditions analysis results. 6.3.1 Existing Condition [Year 2014] This analysis is based on the existing roadway configuration at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection. Table 20 shows the analysis results for the Year 2014 Existing Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 20 - Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2014] 6.3.2 East End (During Construction) [Year 2017] The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 21 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 41 Com nsultinr ,—L L C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound A-7 55 B — 11 100 (West Meadow Drive) Westbound A-9 50 B — 10 70 (East Meadow Drive) Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 100 (Vail Road) Southbound A-9 95 B — 10 95 (Vail Road) Overall Intersection A-9 95 (max) B — 11 100 (max) all vehicles 6.3.2 East End (During Construction) [Year 2017] The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 21 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow T�I.11'17�{�Y Page 41 Com nsultinr ,—L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 21- Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] Table 21 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End parking structure when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. 6.3.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 vehicles per day (based on August 2013 traffic count) to less than 20 trips per day (service vehicles only). The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. Therefore, the year 2035 Build -out Condition was not analyzed at this intersection. 7 Conclusion and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized -,,1 urnn_ey Page 42 ____Consulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) A-7 50 B — 10 95 West Meadow DriveEastbound Westbound A — 10 55 A-9 65 East Meadow Drive)—T Northbound A-8 55 B — 12 90 Vail Road Southbound A — 10 115 B — 11 100 Vail Road Overall Intersection A-9 115 (max) B — 11 100 (max) all vehicles Table 21 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End parking structure when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. 6.3.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 vehicles per day (based on August 2013 traffic count) to less than 20 trips per day (service vehicles only). The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. Therefore, the year 2035 Build -out Condition was not analyzed at this intersection. 7 Conclusion and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized -,,1 urnn_ey Page 42 ____Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. 7.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. The "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access (RIRO) and TOV Access (3/4 movement) thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. 7.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction due to the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building being accesses via West Meadow Drive. However, the increase in traffic at this intersection will only be 11% (AM) and 8% (PM), and there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at this intersection. No changes are recommended at this intersection. Turn�{eY Page 43 Com nsultinr ,_L L C VVMC Master Plan TIS Appendix • Methodology submitted to TOV and CDOT • Traffic Count Data o Winter Season Traffic Counts — February 4, 2014 o Summer Season Traffic Counts —August 21-22, 2013 • Peak Hour Calculations • Project Trip Generation Calculations • Project Trip Distribution Calculations • FHU Email to TOV Regarding Traffic Forecasts • Evergreen Lodge o Select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study prepared in year 2008 o Trip Generation and Distribution Calculations • Traffic Volumes at Study Area Intersections • Proposed Roundabout Analysis Output [Intersection #1] • Frontage Road and VVMC Access Analysis Output [Intersection #2] o "First and Alone" Alternative Sketch • Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Output [Intersection #3] • FHU Memo regarding Proposed Roundabout, dated August 1, 2014 �I.11'17�{�Y Page 44 Com nsultinr ,_L L C Traffic Volume Development — VVMC Master Plan TIS Methodology submitted to TOV and CDOT TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef tend—hip Mark Bunnell From: Tom Kassmel <TKassmel@vailgov.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 2:38 PM To: 'Harbert - CDOT, Kent'; Mark Bunnell Cc: Daniel Roussin; Daniel Feeney; Skip Hudson Subject: RE: Vail Valley Medical Center - Study Area & Traffic Data Methodology Mark, See my response below in bold. • Study area will only include the potential VVMC Main Access (south leg) and TOV municipal building access (north leg) to the 1-70 South Frontage Road. I agree the roundabout does not necessarily be analyzed, however we will have to understand the impacts of a new intersection on the multiple adjacent intersections as Kent suggests. • Collecting traffic counts for two weekday AM & PM peak hour periods will be sufficient to calculate the existing trip generation. I would guess that Summer mid week traffic patterns are significantly lower from winter. would suggest that a winter count be done as well, during a busier time period. The Town of Vail did winter counts along the Frontage Road this past winter that can be used as a comparison. • Existing and future background traffic volumes for the 1-70 South Frontage Road will be based on the Vail MOB traffic study, the Vail TMP, and follow-up work by FHU. Ok From: Harbert - CDOT, Kent[maiIto:kent.harbert@state.co.us] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 4:21 PM To: Mark Bunnell Cc: Daniel Roussin; Tom Kassmel; Daniel Feeney; Skip Hudson Subject: Re: Vail Valley Medical Center - Study Area & Traffic Data Methodology Mark, I am not familiar with the previous study, but based on what you say about it I am okay with not analyzing the roundabout at the interchange. However, I do see that there a half dozen or so access onto the frontage road in proximity to this project that will need to be addressed at some point in the process. Thanks, xent T. Kent Harbert, PE Access Engineer CDOT Region 3, Traffic and Safety Residency 222 South 6t" Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, CO 81501-3794 Phone: 970-683-6279 Cell: 970-812-6768 Fax: 970-683-6290 kent.harbertAstate.co.us On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Mark Bunnell <markbLturnkeyllc.net> wrote: Dan, Kent, and Tom, I am in the very early stages of a traffic study related to a potential master plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) and want to get confirmation on the study area and traffic data. Typically, I would submit a full methodology (study area, traffic data, land use, trip generation & distribution, analysis periods & methods, etc), but at this point we just want to get the traffic counted before the summer season ends. I will submit a full methodology at a later date, assuming the master plan effort moves forward. Please review the details below and provide comments. Project The VVMC is looking at doing a master plan for their Vail campus, but the work is very preliminary and the possible concepts described in this email have not been finalized. The possible redevelopment of the VVMC could change the layout such that the VVMC Main Access would be on the 1-70 South Frontage Road, instead of on West Meadow Dr as it is today. There would possibly be a service access on West Meadow Drive that would not be used by patrons or employees so the future VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive would be lower than existing. Study Area The study area will only include one intersection — the potential VVMC Main Access to the 1-70 South Frontage Road (see aerial image below). The TOV municipal building would be the north leg of the potential VVMC Main Access. y k. a,� n 3y� yWh 0 -Ink .. V -r�..._ We considered including the south roundabout at the Vail interchange in the study area, but did not include it for the following reasons: • The TOV completed an extensive evaluation of alternatives at the Main Vail Interchange Roundabouts as part of the 2025 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Vail TMP). The Vail TMP concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at the interchange, and concluded that other system -wide improvements would be needed to provide an acceptable level of service (LOS) at the interchange. • The Vail TMP discusses how reconfiguring the VVMC so that its main access is on the 1-70 South Frontage Road would improve the south roundabout. On page 37 of the Vail TMP it states: Another consideration listed in Table 6. but not specificalf quantified. is the modi-kation of the Hospital's access. The Vail'Va ley Med con' Centers currently served by Meadow Dare via !fail Road. As SLI ch. nearly all cf its traffic mpacts the south rcund?k044 iMe--section along khe Vail Road (Sc41th) leg. The Center is in the planning process to reconfickare its fac ity such that it might have -rn access directly onto tine Fioni ge Roil .%-est of 91e rounCl,1!. 01L!t across from the M1.1111 ip, I Center This veauld 'shift" scene of th s `a+cilrrr s traViic ori of the south roundabout and off of the south r03dW-3y "leg.. which is projected to operate at a poor LOS. Th,s, scheme requires coordination with the ether near!3y uses: access points. but it could offer a small dose of traffic rel.ef to the heavily -used south roundabout. TurnKey Consulting prepared a traffic study for the Vail Medical Office Building (Vail MOB) in 2012. The traffic study was completed, but not submitted because the Vail MOB project did not continue. The Vail MOB consisted of constructing a medical office building and parking garage on the north side of the 1-70 South Frontage Road adjacent to the TOV municipal building. The Vail MOB / TOV municipal building access (north leg) would have lined up with the potential access to the VVMC main access (south leg). As part of the Vail MOB traffic study, CDOT and the TOV reviewed and approved a methodology that stated that the study area would only include the access to the Vail MOB, and not include the south roundabout at the Vail Interchange for the first reason listed above. Traffic Volume Data TurnKey Consulting plans to calculate the trip generation for the VVMC master plan based on the existing trips to/from the VVMC campus. In order to do that, we plan to conduct traffic counts at the three existing accesses to the VVMC campus for the durations listed below. The trip generation based on the summer season will be factored to the peak season (winter). • AM & PM peak periods (two hours each) • Two Weekdays (Tues & Wed OR Wed & Thur) The existing and future background traffic volumes on the 1-70 South Frontage Road will come from previous studies [Vail MOB traffic study prepared by TurnKey Consulting, Vail TMP, and follow-up work by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) on a potential roundabout at the VVMC / MOB access (see attached memo)]. The previous studies are based on the peak season (winter) so we do not plan on counting the traffic on the 1-70 South Frontage Road. Summary At this point I am looking for confirmation on the following: • Study area will only include the potential VVMC Main Access (south leg) and TOV municipal building access (north leg) to the 1-70 South Frontage Road • Collecting traffic counts for two weekday AM & PM peak hour periods will be sufficient to calculate the existing trip generation • Existing and future background traffic volumes for the 1-70 South Frontage Road will be based on the Vail MOB traffic study, the Vail TMP, and follow-up work by FHU. Please call or email if you have questions. Thanks, Mark Bunnell, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC M: 970-640-2677 O: 970-985-4001 markba-turnkeyllc.net 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 Networks Unlimited FilterIT identified this as CLEAN. Give feedback: This is SPAM • More VVMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Count Data • Winter Season Traffic Counts — February 4, 2014 • Summer Season Traffic Counts —August 21-22, 2013 TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOde hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Counts Collected on Wednesday and Thursday, August 21-22, 2013 08/21/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/21/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/21/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/21/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/21/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/21/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/21/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/21/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/21/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/21/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/21/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/21/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/21/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/21/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/21/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/21/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/22/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/22/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/22/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/22/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/22/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/22/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/22/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/22/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/22/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/22/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/22/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/22/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/22/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/22/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Max PM Peak Hour Max 0000©� Guest Access Service Access Employee Access Total Date/Time (W Meadow Dr) (W Meadow Dr) (Frontage Road) VVMC Trips 2 SB OUT NB IN SB OUT NB IN NB OUTJ SB IN OUT I IN 08/21/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/21/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/21/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/21/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/21/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/21/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/21/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/21/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/21/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/21/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/21/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/21/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/21/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/21/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/21/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/21/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/22/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/22/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/22/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/22/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/22/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/22/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/22/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/22/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/22/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/22/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/22/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/22/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/22/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/22/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Max PM Peak Hour Max 0000©� 21 0 0 17 139 0®000 30 2 0 48 32 ©©000® ®000© ©©000® ©000©® 000©� 00000® 0©00®0 00000 21 0 0 17 139 00000 30 2 0 48 32 ©©000 ®000© 0©000© ®000®0 ®®0000 �000�0 0©00®0 00000 21 0 0 17 139 ©000©® 30 2 0 48 32 ©©000 00000® 0©0000 0000® ©000®® 0�000� 00000 21 0 0 17 139 000000 30 2 0 48 32 0000®0 00000© 00000 12 21 0 0 17 139 44 30 2 0 48 32 Page 1 of 1 3 20 1 60 13 38 9 24 7 22 8 32 2 29 6 19 30 144 23 12 15 19 18 16 19 6 26 15 20 22 29 17 19 8 94 62 4 34 5 61 7 31 13 34 7 12 9 37 17 33 10 22 29 160 13 21 16 13 23 12 24 14 16 8 11 18 21 18 29 21 77 65 29 160 94 62 VVMC Master Plan TIS Peak Hour Calculations TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip U) a� U � CO rn �_ o co CO � CO � CO O cri � � � CO N O N � N N CO � N 00 H � 00 tD O N Lo O O � Q� O 0') C) N cy N 0 0 0 �� 00 N� O O O O � O Q cri cri cri M T cri N m N -00 O O (h (h � I— N LU O � N � Z N (`) N i � � O O l(7 � N � N N N (h 00 (h CO O O � � Q � � N N d � CO O � 00 l(7 � N Y (0 N I� � O o� l(7 O CO l(7 v N l(7 v l(7 O � NT v CD v C.0 v o= iri CO CO o �ci o ui � v o ui o o� O CO l(7 v O o l(7 = O CD LO N LO r r co co M p v E v o Vi o Vi � M (h CO v o � O � l(7 l(7 l(7 co co � � cy CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO ti LO o�crivo CQ � cri v o�c�v ri ri ri ri v v v v �ti iri ori ori G �+ N �..i v i H t4 d �+ LL s 0 0 ti vo Co Co r r r r ao co � CO rn �_ o co CO � CO � CO O cri � � � CO N O N � N N CO � N N H � 00 tD O N Lo O O � Q� O 0') C) N cy N 0 0 0 �� 00 N� O O O O � O Q cri cri cri M T cri N m N -00 O O (h (h � I— N LU O � N � Z N (`) N i � � O O l(7 � N � N N N (h 00 (h CO O O � � Q � � N N CC C � CO O � 00 l(7 � N Y (0 N I� � O o� l(7 O CO l(7 v N l(7 O l(7 O � NT v CD v C.0 v o= iri CO CO o �ci o ui � ui o ui o o� O CO l(7 v O o l(7 = O CD LO N LO r r co co M p v E v o Vi o Vi � M (h CO v o � O � l(7 l(7 l(7 co co � � cy CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO ti LO vo Co Co r r r r ao co � CO O CO CO N � � CO � CO O cri � � � CO N � N � O (h H O O N N � � 00 tD O N Lo O O � Q� O I— l(7 N l(') N 0 0 0 �� 00 N� O O O O � O Q cri cri cri M (ri cri N N N -00 O O (h (h � I— N � O � N � Z N (`) N (`) � I— r O am0 � N N N N N N N N N O � O � Q � Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 � N N I� � O o� l(7 O CO l(7 v O�crivo l(7 O l(7 O � NT v CD v C.0 v o= iri CO CO o �ci o ui � ui o ui o o� CD � o � �c�vo CD LO CD LO CD ri cOvo= ri co p v v v ori v o �crivo M (h (h (h � � �00 3- CD ao rnMo�o� O l(7 � 00 (h 00 CO eco O � �����v � CO CO l(7 l(7 V (h O O O N N � � 00 tD O N Lo O O � Q� CO O � N 00 N 0 0 0 �� 00 I� O O � � � cri cri cri cri M (ri cri N N -00 O O O 00 00 � O I� O (h T O N CO � CO cri � � N a0 N � N N N N N N N N N O � O � Q � Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 � N N I� � O o� l(7 O CO l(7 v O�crivo l(7 O l(7 O � NT v v v p iri iri iri co CO o �ci o ui � ui o ui o o� � CO v p' �c�vo CD LO CD LO CD ri ri ri co p v v v ori v o �crivo M (h (h (h � � �00 � � I� M O l(7 � 00 (h 00 CO N O � l(7 � CO CO l(7 l(7 V (h O O O N N � � 00 tD O N N I� Q1 � O CO N O S 00 N 0 0 0 �� 00 I� O O � � � � O O � � � O O � -00 O a0 N 00 � CO O — ch O T O N CO � CO cri � � N a0 N � O CO l(7 CO CO CO I� � O O � O � (h � Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 O N N I� � a0 a0 a0 l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O � N v M v ori CO � o � CO ~ o �o�o C) � CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO o M �crivo� v v v v cri v o �crivo M (h (h (h � � � � l(7 l(7 l(7 l(7 CO o� l(7 CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO CD LO o�crivo � cri v o�c�v ri ri ri ri v v v v �ti iri ori ori CL CL a CL co � N I� M O N N N I� O CO �prnrn O T O ao O O � O l(i N O � N N N � � 00 tD O N N I� Q1 � l(i N M CO � � O � Q 00 — Ico 00 (h 00 (h 00 O N CO O ti � O O � CO � -00 O a0 N 00 � CO O — ch O T � Z I� N� O co (`'� O co (`'� l(7 � I— (`'� N O N O CO O T � C N C C C N C C C C� C � CC C Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 O N N I� � a0 a0 a0 l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O � N v M v ori CO � o � CO ~ o �o�o C) O CO O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 l(7 O ri ri M co v v v v iri M (h (h (h � � � � l(7 l(7 l(7 l(7 CO 8 l(7 8 l(7 8 l(7 O l(7 8 l(7 8 l(7 N Q �L CO � N I� M O N N N I� O CO �prnrn O T O ao O O � O l(i N O � N N N � � 00 tD O N N I� Q1 � l(i N M CO � � O � Q 00 — Ico 00 (h 00 (h 00 O N CO O ti � O O � CO � -00 O a0 N 00 � CO O — ch O T � Z I� N� O co (`'� O co (`'� l(7 � I— (`'� N O N O CO O T � C N C C C N C C C C� C � CC C Q C C CC C CC C � O � 00 l(7 O N N I� � a0 a0 a0 l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O � N v M v ori CO � o � CO ~ o �o�o C) O CO O l(7 O l(7 CO N N CO O I� CO l(7 N I� O CO 00 O T O O O O O O l(i � O � N N N N � N N (h H I� Q1 � l(i CO I� CO CO O O � l(7 00 — Ico 00 (h 00 (h 00 O N CO N T CO CO CO � CO � -00 O a0 N 00 � CO O � ch O � Z I� N� O co (`'� O co (`'� l(7 � I— (`'� N O N O CO O T � (`'� N N N � N C C C C� C � CC C Q C C CC C CC C CC C N O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O � N v M v ori iri iri iri co ~ o �o�o C) O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 l(7 O ri ri M co v v v v iri M (h (h (h � � CO N O ti 0 I� N N co O N CO 00 O T O O O O O O l(i � (p � N N N N � N N � I� Q1 � l(i CO I� CO CO O O a0 rn p O CO l(7 00 � N N CO N T CO CO CO � CO � a0 N 00 � CO O � ch O rn o p rn ao � co co co � CO O T � (`'� N N N � C C C� C � CC C Q C C CC C CC C CC C N O l(7 l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O v v M v ori iri iri iri co o�ci�ui o �o�o C) l(7 O ',I- o �c�vo O l(7 O l(7 O ri ri M co v v v v iri M (h (h (h � � CO CO CO l(7 l(7 � CO CO O � N CO 00 (`7 (`7 l(i l(i l(i l(i � l(i l(i � (p l(i O l(i I� "T "T O O O O l(7 N O CO l(7 00 � N N CO N CO CO CO CO � CO � O N CO l(7 l(7 00 00 00 � CO O N � (`'� N N N � � N� N l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O l(7 O (h (h (h � � � � l(7 l(7 l(7 l(7 CO 8 l(7 8 l(7 8 l(7 O l(7 8 l(7 8 l(7 i VVMC Master Plan TIS Project Trip Generation Calculations TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip H > S o F r m v o � N cNo N F O N m o A a V ^ O u m o � F LL S � a E � A o d Q S O C1 O O N M U O a r O w v A ~ o O > Q o S a O N N N O O N N ma Q Q J Q > a~ ~ o ro r of co O A ^ o o O O V o A S � a � 0 a O Z O � V r rn v N N Q% C m 12 U O N � A p _ `o S � o O. f^ V a is r C1 M M O N o N V o ~ O Z N } 0 in (O 0 (O l(J 0 O c O 0 W W O L A U N m N O o a V L = 70 ro ro w w o r1 d U ) g > a a z co r co r co r co r o N m' o ~ O O O O = a O E N y � Q Z v v v v cro ro N m c a O a �a m uoi U 7x u1 u1 u1 u1 � o E m m � c o o N N E w o u`oi coo m m r coo O O O O O Q N U N W N M W � - wU°w EwU°w a12 5 ` E 5 •- o u1 001 c � 0 0 0 0 o r \ a N N N N V V � o O C7 C7 r - 4 U W N " "' LL u cO10 c°10 001 001 0 0 u1 u1 u1 u1 co r -- U o d c d U Tn Tn U = U > S rn rn o r voo� M o r N N d g O V ^ O u m o � F LL S � a E � A a m U m U O V O r O O W m A ~ o O o o N N N O NO r N Q Q J Q > a~ ~ o ro r o c o u (0 o mo V o A S � a � 0 a O Z N � V r rn v N V O N � A S � o O. r C1 M M O N o N V o ~ O Z N } 0 in (O 0 (O l(J 0 O c O 0 W W 0 o1 co A O p` N m N O o a V o . o ri v ri o Q .- a o m -o -oo� O m' www w E LU s ~ S m N O a m uoi U o y = a O N W N M W F Q Z m r m v u1 001 c � 0 0 0 0 o r \ a N N N N V V � o O C7 C7 r - 4 U W N " "' LL u cO10 c°10 001 001 0 0 u1 u1 u1 u1 co r -- � - wU°w EwU°w E o o d c d U Tn Tn U = ij U U m o F o co o r voo� M m co C1 o o � d g 7 O M ^ O u m E a z a m U O V O r o LL � =o A ~ O V0 o N N N O NO r Q J Q > a~ ~ o ro r o c o u N w o mo O � z r rn v o 2E O m N o O. r ~ Q Z V N M (00 N N } v o u1 0 co r 0 0 N m o � u1 M a o U o . o c c mo N c U 6 Q .- .- co -o -oo� m' www w VVMC Master Plan TIS Project Trip Distribution Calculations TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Trip Distribution Calculations VVMC Employee / Bank Bldg Entrance and Frontage Rd Municipal Bldg Frontage Road VVMC Employee Ent Frontage Road Peak Hour From North From East From South From West Total Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left I Thru Ri ht Left I Thru I Right 7:30-8:30 am 5 1 0 3 1 84 265 1 39 1 3 1 0 1 18 1 2 1 193 1 11 623 3:30-4:30 pml 13 1 0 5 1 26 278 1 5 1 2 1 0 1 29 1 2 1 350 1 9 719 Peak Hour # Tri s AM Dist. % USE # Trips PM Dist. % USE Trip Distribution Percentages - Frontage Road (Based on Vehicles IN and OUT at VVMC access on Frontage Road) Inbound Outbound From the East (WB LT) From the West I (EB RT) To the East (NB RT) To the West I (NB LT) 84 11 18 3 88.4% 11.6% 85.7% 14.3% 90% 10% 85% 15% 26 9 29 2 74.3% 25.7% 93.5% 6.5% 75% 25% 95% 5% Vail Road and Meadows Drive Vail Rd W Meadows Dr Vail Rd W Meadows Dr Peak Hour From North From East From South From West Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left I Thru Ri ht Left I Thru I Right 7:30-8:30 am 0 1 143 65 1 0 10 1 0 1 0 1 60 1 0 1 28 1 7 1 3 3:30-4:30 pml 4 1 103 88 1 2 18 1 4 1 4 1 151 1 2 1123 1 10 1 9 Peak Hour # Tri s AM Dist. % USE # Trips PM Dist. % USE Trip Distribution Percentages - Vail Road (Based on Vehicles IN and OUT at Meadow Drive and Vail Road Intersection) Inbound Outbound From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) To the South (EB RT) 88 4 123 9 95.7% 4.3% 93.2% 6.8% 95% 5% 95% 5% Page 1 of 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS FHU Email to TOV Regarding Traffic Forecasts TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip Page 1 of 2 Skip Hudson From: Tom Kassmel [TKassmel@vailgov.com] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 8:23 AM To: Skip Hudson; Michael O'Connor (michael@triumphdev.com) Cc: Greg Hall Subject: FW: VOlumes I asked FHU to weigh in on the growth rate after 2025. See below. From: Chris.Fasching[mailto: Chris. Fasching@FHUENG.COM] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 3:01 PM To: Tom Kassmel Subject: RE: VOlumes Tom, We used 0.5% per year growth in the stud hich is pretty darn flat. I think you could safely apply this rate out to 2034. Thanks. Chris Fasching, PE, PTOE Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 303-721-1440 Fax - 303-721-0832 From: Tom Kassmel rmailto:TKassmel@vailgov.coml Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:58 PM To: Chris.Fasching Subject: VOlumes Chris Would you be able to weigh in on the appropriate growth rate for post 2025. So Turnkey (Skip) can extrapolate to 2034. We all agree it should be relatively flat compared to the growth we project until 2025, your thoughts? Tom Kassmel Town Engineer Public Works Department $1 rowM of v 970.479.2235 vailgov.com twitter.com/vailgov Vs 8/14/2012 VVMC Master Plan TIS Evergreen Lodge Select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study prepared in year 2008 Trip Generation and Distribution Calculations TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip Al T R A N S P R T AT 1 N G R U P October 3, 2008 Mr. Adam Williams ARC Integrated Program Management, Inc. 179038 1h Street, Unit 105 Boulder, CO 80301 RE: Fairmont Vail Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Williams: Fox Higgins has completed a traffic impact analysis for the proposed Fairmont Vail project located on the south side of the S. Frontage Road roughly 850 feet west of the main Vail roundabout. This analysis has been completed following "Level Three" traffic assessment requirements per Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Region 3. Per CDOT requirements, this analysis evaluates potential traffic impacts along the S. Frontage Road with respect to operational considerations and auxiliary lane needs for the short-term build -out and long-term (20 -year) scenarios. Since the project and adjacent roadways are anticipated to generate the highest traffic volumes during the peak winter season, this study analyzes the peak winter scenario for the highest of the AM, PM and Saturday peak hour volumes. This memorandum summarizes our analysis and findings. Project Description The Fairmont Vail project is proposing to redevelop the existing Evergreen Lodge hotel with similar uses to include hotel rooms, on-site restaurant and meeting facilities, fractional -ownership units, and residential condominium units. The project site is located along the S. Frontage Rd. just west of mile marker 176. A vicinity map is provided on Figure 1. Nearby accesses and intersections include the main Vail roundabout (Vail Road and 1-70 interchange) located roughly 850 feet east of the east site access, the existing Lionshead parking structure access located roughly 650 feet west of the west site access, and driveways for adjacent uses to the east. Two access driveways along the S. Frontage Road currently serve the site. These accesses are not shared or used by any other properties. The project proposes to relocate the easternmost access roughly 45 feet to the west of the current location, with the east access to serve only service vehicles with redevelopment. The existing westernmost access will serve as the main site access. This access location may need to be adjusted slightly to accommodate grades, though is shown in roughly the existing access location based on the current site plan. The site plan depicting the existing and proposed access points is shown on Figure 2. P.❑. B❑x 1 9768, BOULDER, G❑L❑RAD❑ 8❑3❑8-2768 PHONE: 303-652-3571 ■ FAx: 3173-772-2329 ❑R 303-652-6574 co O M 0 O r _^ CU C >a U O Q E (B U LL cu 5 O p O m O {y � a F O C — O C h @ M M N N -0 A � O 0 b A � 0— f7A d co f� - M O � r Om h P a IL d eo @ 0 M � o. F0 O co co v co eo V V N ty m ^ T A 0 Y= 1 C — m M Oa m N h T � wN= Y N 0 O) O) V @ d O F W M 0 m CO {y �D m CO m M P p IL O F N O O N !' 2 IL O IL A N O O N 2 O M ep fp o. � M m Cm, N — h N T � A N N o. w = N N N p h C — m LO M m M P � F F T` A � W Y= M O b O N IL ?> A F N a r M A O r CO r CO N p 0 C — N CO N CO N p Oa IL N ep M y F 04 A 0 — 0 d ~ �2 P �2 P 0 0 0 i a o pMp V @ o rP. LO P 0 0 O) N M p A O v ccoo N ro p 0 O ^ w O. C o LO N co co M a `9 p 0 0 o N A O rn O) •— mm O a P Ln w CL ~ fp N NN N CO 7 a CN N A O) A O) mCO co m M O O O 0 ate•"— o 0 0 0 0 O P O O o N z CO c a a a U O OUB U O OU d' U O OU N 0 c N X W d d O CL O 0 0M9= o 0 0 0 z S •� 'oS a a° o 'Q E 'Q E 3 A o U O O U O O E O) .N X W d d 0 a O J 0 0 y _ O O d N S o 9 S w a o O A J -am3 m ° 0 z a a O 7 O C o. at G v J y O W'0O 0 m m m a o W R N 5 O p O m O {y M CL O C @ M N V O b A � 0— f7A d co f� M O � r Om h P a M N N CL F 5 O N m N ty N m N h 0 m M m m N h T � wN= Y C W M 0 m CO {y �D m CO m M P p TjN d O F !' IL N O O N 2 O IL A h N N N o. 5N O N N N p h C — m LO M m m q @ F T` A � W Y= M O b O N cl ?> A F a 04 A — y F 0 V CO pMp V @ @ •� � 0 O F O) O! O) m P @ 0 0 i a o o rn O a `9 p 0 0 o N A O rn v co a O N w CL ~ CN N A O) O! O) O) m M P p F P -e N N N N CO i a O 0 a N'�— o 0 0 0 0M9= o 0 0 0 z c 'Q E 'Q E 'Q E M U O O U O O U O O O) .N X W d d 0 a O N 0 0 _ S s S a` A -am3 0 a 0 O 7 O C o. J y O 0 d ] w0 a o O 9 J m o Z a G v y L at G v � W 0 m m m W R N a M a d N fC 2 CU G i7 i 00 0 a o z m oN N ik m O m A v m c2 O H H o O a Z W O W H ie O r V W M O H H = o o V O z o 0 � � N U U! No W V W c� o - O � � K O _ � O Y O O w a + + Q X X L O J J � A O rorn W O O Y � II II m A F F a J J G \ \a. a oo � 00 -tea o m Y = G1 ° O 7 V 77 o H = F � m N O D = o 0 m z 0 0 N\O �O � a W v '- w a m N � A v � Q o 0 N m O O W � N O + _ + y X w o X a - J w 00 II II F F J V I� V (O O OoIr ~ N V r O. Z_ V N O a ik r co r� F O O r O H ° O. Z V N O H O r (O O (O O H = 0 0 ° M V O z o 0 (�O N U! � � K O O Y A N O U! M a + L O J � A 0 Q m rn W 00 II II Y � ~ F (Q A � J \ \ G 00 � N � � Q N � � � O °8 Z F m O N W F O O N M K °8 c 7 � a Z � >N fl - 2 Ll U F O O N U O F N_ W M U! N O '6 N = O c U A U N O 6 = O c U N A � J - N O N d O N O M N O O M N M N c N � � Q N � O K -a � U O � � O °8 Z F m O N W F M N O U! N O '6 = O c U A � J - N N d N O O O M N � M VVMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Volumes at Study Area Intersections TurnKey ConsuRing, LLC Superior Prnjeef [eOd—hip � lollsmom 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 smilloom 1111111M smillsom IN111111 smilloom III iioo iioiiiio iioiiiio 11111111111111111111111111 � 0110 21111112 01111110 01111110 1111111101111110 INS11 somilloll INS111111 INS111111 sommillis somilloll a 1110 01111110 01111110 01111110 1111111111111111 u gill 11211119 11111111111111111111111111211111 11 11111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 •' aiieeiieiiiieiieiieiieiiiieiieiiieiieiiiie I� @IIS M111111M 21111112 91111119 m ■opo ■o■lio■o millions millions millions millions O N ONr N (O Mr NIS N O V M N NN O p) V NOO"t rO N O OM N O ON O p r O s¢� Y F O 00 O O O O � O O o F M M M M M M M M M M M N N _ 4 Q O O oro N O 0 N O O O O ro O r O � � F O � Z J N N N N V V M M O O w W m a Y � O 0 d s 3 V N N W (O (O V V N N V 0 O O O M M N W V V H _ ui -6 a O O m N O O M M V V Ci V W O O M M (O w O O N N M M O m Q 4 M W m O O N O O O O O N m r r r 11N r r OW Q J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N _ cU ,� C .�- 7 M r � U � U -1 > ; Z N M V O N > R f0 y6 0 O M N W V O V c (O N N M O r M V N O M O -,t N O O M N N O (O N (0O m O N a LL H VNNO ¢matia`am Q Q�-sZaO�p ONM ONWMr ONMr OMNNMr OMNOMr OMNNMr O LL 'o 0 NM tr NN O N 1 1 0 O O O O O O O OM M M N N O O m m QOmN o2 N NO -O1 1 O O N O N N N M N W M N M Ni W WmO O N NW 11 O O O O p OO N N N N B p� 3 M N N 0 w m M V V 4 a� N � F m m V V V w V m V m V O N O N N N N N V (O V (O W Q F N N o p N N N N N N N N M M m F Q N N O N r F O N U Z — W O O O N M > N N m .. '0 m '0 U m 2 '0 U m 2 'o U m 2 '0 U m 2 '0 U m 2 ` po m tr m m m U J F F Z Z Z Z m O m m m> m> U J m O m m> m> U J m O m m> m> U J m O m m> m> U J m o m m> m> U J (n U m m Q a m U m U m w o umi Q m m Q w m m Q w m m Q N m Q w o ,U� N m m U 0 U o - m .- m N m m U U °� U H 0 N m m U U m U O 0 N m m U U m U O 0 N m m U w U o U H 0 O N m m U U m U H 0 -�- � Q�U� o Q�U� o Q�U� o <>< Q>U� ~ oQ2� > o >0 > o >0 > o >0 > o > >¢ o > LL 0 > LL > > LL > > LL > > LL > > LL 0 > > F F U F F U F F U F F U F F U F 6 V O O d > 0 d O O O O M O } >� m a m O o o 0 v v Us o' E O W U N o' W E O NU -a o d xxa w w Q > > 'N U v w` w V — m .0 > 0 0 O 0 O R 0 0 C N 0) a` a 0 m 0 m M M 0) 1T a (4 W r-00 O) 0) O O O N N S co 0 O 00 O In CO � N r, r 00 r- O M � N r O N O In co r 117 M M r co r 117 co M V H co O) 00 a1 O r O O O O N O O r N C �[ co O 00 Lo r 04 -It r In r r f- O r N N r N c a O -0i M co O O M O V O -It O 'IT O 'It O Lo O 0 O Ln O In O V H O � a N N N N N N N N N N N N N c O N N co M M M V -It co 00 t ~ In In 117 Lti 117 LI) 117 L() In L() 117 CO LD r � O Z J V O V LoO O r O co M O V O O O O O O Y N � � o d i W 00 00 OD 00 O2 00 OD 00 OD 00 O O ~ J N N N N N N N N N N N N N a ` O In V Q) to In N r In M 00 In V O In O N . O LD c 0 0= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � a � W g H M O) V M f` N L O O 00 O) M N � O W � N O r V r V � V N O V In In In N In to 00N o O UZ s'a ICA N C2 O fD 0 N Ln M M (D V LD cf LnLn N 00 Ln Lo O Ln W M Ln N N 1` N M N M NN N M N M N N N o_Ln O L!') N p O r O r rOOOONN NNOCD N V LD p N N a N M N N Lfl 00 N N N M M M V � V a Ln N CD w O) V V - V V J O O O O O O O O O O O O O c _ 0 ° ° 2 t 0 0 0 0 0 r` rte~ O O (D c0 (D CO fD CO fD CO fD c0 (D O Z J O O cc O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O -� O O O O O O O O O O O Oco O 0 O �° a Ho a co N Mp r N r N M r N M -0 r r O r c p 0 3 wH cc W u J co O O N O O O N -7, M O O O O O O O N _ N W Is Z ID a v N a N a N a w a In a co c c C C c c °O L) H Q — O rn O H Q O H Q O H Q O H Q O H Q ~ F F F H H F w c Q .c ~ L) m LY) m L) m L) co m L) m m V cIn CD r W Ln O O O O O O M O N � N N N N N 0) c fl a C U a a W N O -° C 0 a a C y c) O N 0 w c c a) W U Lu c a) N 1T O p) O "O O a c 0 0 W w.5 w m o M M 0) 1T a VVMC Master Plan TIS Proposed Roundabout Analysis Output [Intersection #1] • Year 2018 AM Peak Hour • Year 2018 PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 AM Peak Hour • HCM 2010— FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • HCM 2010 — Default Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — Default Factors and Parameters TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 r W aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 8 T1 1 18 R2 70 Approach 0.114 88 East: 170 S FR 0.4 1u U 213 1 L2 51 6 T1 800 16 R2 1 Approach 3.0 1065 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 4 T1 1 14 R2 1 Approach 50.9 3 West: 170 S FR 3.0 5 L2 1 2 T1 521 12 R2 13 Approach 6.2 535 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 24.0 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 3.7 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 22.2 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 22.3 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 24.5 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 13.7 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 24.0 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 13.1 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 23.6 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 23.7 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 4.1 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 22.0 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 16.5 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 13.2 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 24.5 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 13.2 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 24.2 3.0 0.387 5.9 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.21 0.13 23.7 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:17:50 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_HCM Wolcott.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS B A B B A 0 r aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 8 T1 1 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 18 R2 70 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 Approach 88 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 213 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 1 L2 51 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 6 T1 800 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 16 R2 1 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 Approach 1065 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 4 T1 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 14 R2 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 Approach 3 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 2 T1 521 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 12 R2 13 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 Approach 535 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.437 8.7 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.27 0.20 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Friday, August 01, 2014 8:14:01 AM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Ana lysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_HCM Default.sip6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC 22.2 3.4 20.7 20.7 24.2 13.6 23.7 12.9 23.3 22.0 3.9 20.6 15.4 12.4 23.0 12.4 22.7 23.0 SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 r W Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Year 2018 - AM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 8 T1 1 18 R2 70 Approach 0.154 88 East: 170 S FR 0.6 1u Ll 213 1 L2 51 6 T1 800 16 R2 1 Approach 3.0 1065 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 4 T1 1 14 R2 1 Approach 81.0 3 West: 170 S FR 3.0 5 L2 1 2 T1 521 12 R2 13 Approach 0.6 535 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.154 8.7 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 24.9 3.0 0.154 4.3 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 3.8 3.0 0.154 4.8 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 23.0 3.0 0.154 5.6 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 0.71 23.1 3.0 0.394 7.0 LOS A 3.2 81.0 0.16 0.37 26.0 3.0 0.394 5.5 LOS A 3.2 81.0 0.16 0.37 14.6 3.0 0.394 0.6 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 0.18 25.4 3.0 0.394 1.5 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 0.09 13.8 3.0 0.394 2.1 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 0.23 25.0 i 3.0 0.006 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 24.5 3.0 0.006 4.9 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 4.3 3.0 0.006 5.3 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 22.7 3.0 0.006 6.5 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 0.59 17.0 3.0 0.247 7.0 LOS A 1.4 36.0 0.48 0.31 13.5 3.0 0.247 2.1 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.48 0.30 25.1 3.0 0.247 2.9 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.47 0.30 13.5 3.0 0.247 2.1 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.48 0.30 24.8 3.0 0.394 2.3 LOS A 3.2 81...3............................._0.29.................................._0..28.........................._24.8 _.._...._..... Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:21:59 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 PM Peak Hour • HCM 2010— FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • HCM 2010 — Default Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — Default Factors and Parameters TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 061 r .1.. W aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 8 T1 1 18 R2 75 Approach 0.160 80 East: 170 S FR 0.5 1u U 140 1 L2 82 6 T1 791 16 R2 2 Approach 3.0 1015 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 4 T1 1 14 R2 1 Approach 46.8 4 West: 170 S FR 3.0 5 L2 1 2 T1 1136 12 R2 27 Approach 5.9 1164 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 22.7 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 3.2 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 21.1 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 20.9 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 24.7 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 13.8 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 24.1 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 13.1 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 23.3 i 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 23.5 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 4.3 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 21.9 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 18.2 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 12.7 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 23.6 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 12.8 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 23.4 3.0 0.499 7.4 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.29 0.21 23.3 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:31:04 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-PM_HCM Wolcott.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 r W Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - FHWA-Approved Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.204 11.1 LOS B 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 24.0 8 T1 1 3.0 0.204 6.8 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 3.4 18 R2 75 3.0 0.204 7.2 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.2 Approach 80 3.0 0.204 7.4 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.1 East: 170 S FR 1 u Ll 140 3.0 0.370 6.9 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 26.2 1 L2 82 3.0 0.370 5.4 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 14.6 6 T1 791 3.0 0.370 0.5 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.17 25.5 16 R2 2 3.0 0.370 1.4 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.08 13.9 Approach 1015 3.0 0.370 1.8 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.20 24.7 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.008 9.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 24.3 4 T1 1 3.0 0.008 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 4.5 14 R2 1 3.0 0.008 5.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 22.5 Approach 4 3.0 0.008 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 18.7 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.517 7.3 LOS A 3.8 97.3 0.57 0.35 13.4 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.57 0.35 24.9 12 R2 27 3.0 0.517 3.2 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.34 13.5 Approach 1164 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.35 24.6 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.517 2.3 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.35 0.30 24.6 ....._........ Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:33:07 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS c A A c B a4 ' 90 � � P ti r a MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour HCM 2010 - Default Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 8 T1 1 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 18 R2 75 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 Approach 80 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 140 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 1 L2 82 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 6 T1 791 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 16 R2 2 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 Approach 1015 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 4 T1 1 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 14 R2 1 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 Approach 4 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 12 R2 27 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 Approach 1164 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.765 14.8 LOS B 7.8 200.1 0.46 0.46 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Friday, August 01, 2014 8:11:26 AM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Ana lysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-PM_HCM Default.sip6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC 19.6 2.8 18.4 18.3 24.6 13.7 24.0 13.1 23.3 22.0 4.1 20.6 17.0 11.2 20.7 11.2 20.5 SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A 0 r W Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters aV ' 90 � � P ti r MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout Year 2018 - PM Peak Hour SIDRA - Default Factors & Parameters South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.204 11.1 LOS B 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 24.0 8 T1 1 3.0 0.204 6.8 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 3.4 18 R2 75 3.0 0.204 7.2 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.2 Approach 80 3.0 0.204 7.4 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 0.79 22.1 East: 170 S FR 1 u Ll 140 3.0 0.370 6.9 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 26.2 1 L2 82 3.0 0.370 5.4 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 0.33 14.6 6 T1 791 3.0 0.370 0.5 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.17 25.5 16 R2 2 3.0 0.370 1.4 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.08 13.9 Approach 1015 3.0 0.370 1.8 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 0.20 24.7 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.008 9.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 24.3 4 T1 1 3.0 0.008 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 4.5 14 R2 1 3.0 0.008 5.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 22.5 Approach 4 3.0 0.008 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 0.62 18.7 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.517 7.3 LOS A 3.8 97.3 0.57 0.35 13.4 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.57 0.35 24.9 12 R2 27 3.0 0.517 3.2 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.34 13.5 Approach 1164 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 0.35 24.6 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.517 2.3 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.35 0.30 24.6 ....._........ Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:33:07 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: D:\Project Files(P)Wctive Projects\WMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC VVMC Master Plan TIS Frontage Road and VVMC Access / TOV Access [Intersection #2] • Year 2014 — Existing Condition • Year 2018 — East End (Construction Completed) o Existing Conditions o "First and Alone" Alternative ■ Sketch ■ Analysis Output • Year 2035 — Build -out Condition NOTE. The VVMC Access and TOV Access are offset by approximately 100 -feet. Because of the offset, they were modeled as two Tee -intersections to account for the impact of the offset. In the Synchro and Sim Traffic analysis output, the VVMC Access is listed as Intersection #2, and the TOV Access is Intersection #20. TurnKey Consulting. LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2014 - Existing Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 477 11 84 707 3 18 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1853 0 2006 1863 1635 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 1853 0 2006 1863 1635 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.60 0.60 0.92 0.60 0.60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 536 0 140 768 35 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 493 788 39 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1713 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1713 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.60 0.92 0.92 0.60 0.60 0.60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 536 857 65 13 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.4 3.3 0.3 31.0 3.2 0.6 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 6.1 0.1 1.3 0.2 17.6 11.5 0.9 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 11 47 64 32 Average Queue (ft) 0 23 4 14 95th Queue (ft) 6 48 30 37 Link Distance (ft) 466 54 148 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 30 0 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB SB Directions Served L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 12 103 27 Average Queue (ft) 1 6 5 95th Queue (ft) 10 59 22 Link Distance (ft) 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 31 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 982 9 26 727 2 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1859 0 2006 1863 1623 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 1859 0 2006 1863 1623 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.92 0.50 0.50 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1085 0 52 790 62 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 1009 748 5 13 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1729 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.965 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1729 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.50 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1097 813 10 36 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.0 0.8 9.3 0.2 46.2 4.5 0.9 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) Total Network Performance 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.0 23.0 8.2 0.7 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.3 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 4 38 40 59 Average Queue (ft) 0 15 2 20 95th Queue (ft) 3 41 22 48 Link Distance (ft) 466 54 148 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 0 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB SB Directions Served L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 9 75 48 Average Queue (ft) 0 3 12 95th Queue (ft) 5 51 35 Link Distance (ft) 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 39 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 - East End (Construction Completed) Existing Conditions • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 523 21 191 775 9 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1852 0 2006 1863 1637 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 1852 0 2006 1863 1637 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 596 0 255 842 83 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 574 963 39 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.75 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 624 1047 52 11 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.7 0.4 4.4 0.6 56.6 10.4 1.8 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) Total Network Performance 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 2.8 0.4 18.2 15.7 1.9 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 19 51 80 115 Average Queue (ft) 1 34 23 35 95th Queue (ft) 9 49 75 79 Link Distance (ft) 466 0 54 148 Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 0 15 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 13 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 104 1 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB WB SB Directions Served L T R LR Maximum Queue (ft) 9 261 48 27 Average Queue (ft) 0 28 2 5 95th Queue (ft) 5 134 47 22 Link Distance (ft) 467 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 121 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --f. '4— Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ + Vii r Volume (vph) 1077 39 116 797 8 148 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1852 0 2006 1863 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1852 0 2006 1863 1770 1583 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1223 0 155 866 11 197 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt + r Volume (vph) 2 1223 908 5 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.75 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1329 987 7 11 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 679.2 705.7 2.7 3.7 524.5 307.6 474.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 69.5 71.6 81.1 1.2 850.2 43.5 50.0 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) Total Network Performance 0.0 691.5 729.8 0.1 0.1 402.8 0.3 110.8 0.4 280.8 632.0 48.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 657.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 94.6 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB NB Directions Served TR L T L R Maximum Queue (ft) 354 37 57 92 120 Average Queue (ft) 242 27 43 37 69 95th Queue (ft) 618 42 59 107 146 Link Distance (ft) 466 42 149 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 49 17 54 6 22 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 495 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 67 54 Queuing Penalty (veh) 534 63 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB EB WB WB SB Directions Served L T T R LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 4 485 479 74 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 296 241 19 95th Queue (ft) 4 4 637 628 73 Link Distance (ft) 42 467 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 53 48 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1093 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 - East End (Construction Completed) "First and Alone" Alternative • Sketch • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip .5'a ,Irk ra ,rx A A -A":101 V VA C A F /1'a 000, A edlidwf vvzv ape -in A/gkT QvT "First and Alone" Alternative Td V rz'r a,, 7-1 9 0 A— of,- e e rl api l r2 of✓ri�Jt.� 1�«ellw,l lin e -A*I`weeh * NO pQA-Ha%Q d a"r 67 r VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 9/30/2014 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 Lane Group EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft Zli tt Volume (vph) 607 0 215 47 921 16 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.891 Flt Protected 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1643 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1643 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 200 300 200 Travel Time (s) 5.5 8.2 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 660 0 234 51 1001 17 70 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 660 0 0 285 1001 87 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 9/30/2014 --I. .4--- t/o.i II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r Volume (vph) 0 647 239 0 1179 57 0 0 72 7 0 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.993 0.865 0.955 Flt Protected 0.968 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 1722 0 Flt Permitted 0.968 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 1722 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 300 380 200 200 Travel Time (s) 8.2 10.4 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 703 260 0 1282 62 0 0 78 8 0 4 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 703 260 0 1344 0 0 0 78 0 12 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2035 - Build-out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.3 4.9 5.3 0.3 45.8 16.4 1.9 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 3.5 16.4 4.7 0.5 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.8 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 Intersection: 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB EB WB NB T T UL LR 5 3 116 126 0 0 54 48 4 3 93 95 168 168 125 1 0 200 Intersection: 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) B203 NB SB T R LTR 11 70 34 0 29 9 7 55 31 92 114 126 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative Lanes, Volumes, Timings 9/30/2014 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 Lane Group EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft tt Volume (vph) 1265 0 137 75 987 4 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.872 Flt Protected 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1619 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1619 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 200 300 200 Travel Time (s) 5.5 8.2 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 1375 0 149 82 1073 4 75 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1375 0 0 231 1073 79 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 9/30/2014 --I. .4--- t/o.i II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r 41 Volume (vph) 0 1288 183 0 1189 85 0 0 186 22 0 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.990 0.865 0.958 Flt Protected 0.967 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 1726 0 Flt Permitted 0.967 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 1726 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 300 380 200 200 Travel Time (s) 8.2 10.4 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1400 199 0 1292 92 0 0 202 24 0 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1400 199 0 1384 0 0 0 202 0 35 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 13.3 14.7 0.3 139.6 34.6 2.6 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 9.1 19.4 6.3 1.1 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out "First and Alone" Alternative 8/18/2014 Intersection: 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Movement EB EB WB NB B105 Directions Served T T UL LR T Maximum Queue (ft) 8 11 139 153 26 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 71 55 2 95th Queue (ft) 5 7 122 125 24 Link Distance (ft) 168 168 125 72 Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement B203 B203 NB SB Directions Served T T R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 16 18 127 61 Average Queue (ft) 1 1 59 21 95th Queue (ft) 8 8 103 51 Link Distance (ft) 92 92 114 126 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 — Build -out Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj­f tead­hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 � � i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r r Volume (vph) 0 654 239 0 1179 57 0 0 72 0 0 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 500 200 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 13.6 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 711 260 0 1344 0 0 0 78 0 0 12 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out SimTraffic Performance Report 7/31/2014 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 2.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.4 2.9 4.4 0.6 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 1.0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out Intersection: 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement NB SB Directions Served R R Maximum Queue (ft) 55 33 Average Queue (ft) 23 10 95th Queue (ft) 44 34 Link Distance (ft) 146 160 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 7/31/2014 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 � � i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r r Volume (vph) 0 1310 183 0 1189 85 0 0 186 0 0 32 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 500 200 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 13.6 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1424 199 0 1384 0 0 0 202 0 0 35 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out SimTraffic Performance Report 7/31/2014 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 2.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6 8.2 4.7 1.1 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 1.7 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out Intersection: 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement WB NB SB Directions Served TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 4 124 48 Average Queue (ft) 0 51 22 95th Queue (ft) 4 95 49 Link Distance (ft) 472 146 160 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 7/31/2014 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] Year 2014 — Existing Condition Year 2017 — East End (During Construction) TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2014 - Existing Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 28 7 3 1 10 1 1 60 1 1 143 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1116 0 Flt Permitted 0.965 0.996 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1116 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 41 0 0 13 0 0 67 0 0 227 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.5 9.3 7.9 9.0 8.5 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 9.8 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Intersection: I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 65 68 67 122 24 14 33 55 53 50 56 93 384 491 466 426 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 II Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 123 10 9 2 18 4 4 151 2 4 103 88 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1093 0 Flt Permitted 0.959 0.996 0.999 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1093 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 155 0 0 26 0 0 170 0 0 212 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.5 10.2 12.0 10.4 10.9 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 12.1 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Intersection: I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 136 79 131 131 54 26 55 56 99 70 100 96 384 491 466 426 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2017 - East End (During Construction) • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 --1. .4--- t II i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 30 7 3 1 10 1 1 61 1 1 145 80 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1109 0 Flt Permitted 0.964 0.996 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1109 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 44 0 0 13 0 0 68 0 0 246 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.9 9.5 7.8 9.9 9.2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 9.8 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Intersection: I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 38 48 43 96 23 18 35 63 50 56 54 114 384 491 466 426 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 --1. .4--- t II i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 128 10 9 2 18 4 4 153 2 4 105 95 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1091 0 Flt Permitted 0.958 0.996 0.999 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1091 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 160 0 0 26 0 0 172 0 0 221 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.4 9.2 11.5 10.6 10.7 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 12.0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Intersection: I Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 116 81 114 129 54 24 53 59 94 66 89 101 384 491 466 426 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS FHU Memo Regarding Proposed Roundabout TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Proj—f Lead—hip M A FELSBURG ' HOLT & ULLEVIG connecting and enhancing communities August 1, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, Town of Vail FROM: Chris Fasching SUBJECT: Evergreen, VVMC, Municipal Center Roundabout FHU Reference 14-236 Introduction Various redevelopments are being considered along both sides of the South Frontage Road west of the Main Vail roundabout. One area includes the Municipal Center in which the existing eastern Municipal Center building would remain, but the western building would be replaced with a parking structure. Across the South Frontage Road, Evergreen and the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) are contemplating redevelopment as well. This memorandum specifically explores the nuances of various access schemes with respect to a roundabout intersection serving these uses. It is already anticipated that the roundabout would need to two lanes to function (and this analysis confirms that notion). Traffic Projections Peak hour traffic projections used in the analysis were developed from the long term projections from the latest travel demand model runs which were made in support of planning and design for the 1-70 underpass project near Simba Run. Further, available peak hour trip generation estimates associated with a potential Evergreen redevelopment and of a VVMC expansion have been accounted. The parking structure was assumed to contain 325 spaces in which one-half would be associated with a directional peak hour trip (inbound in the morning and outbound in the evening). Table 1 shows the various trip -making components and their assumed peak hour trip generation. These serve as the basis for analysis in assessing varying access scenarios. The VVMC has the potential of generating the greatest amount of traffic of the three uses, although the impact could end up being less than that shown. It should be noted that the estimates shown in Table 1 are rough at this point as the character and scale of each redevelopment is still evolving. 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 t,l �03.721.1440 fax 303.721.0832 wwwAl7ueng.com infogfliueng.coin August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 2 Table 1 Peak Hour Traffic Components and Trip Estimates** * AM (PM) Peak hour in vehicles per hour. **Through traffic along the Frontage Road used in this was based on latest travel demand model run in support of 1-70 Underpass project. Access Alternatives A design charette, held July 16, 2014 in Vail, resulted in three fundamental alternatives to be analyzed; each has a sub -option as well. The primary alternatives locate the roundabout in a slightly different location along the Frontage Road, and the sub -options pertain to adjustments in access locations. The exception is Alternative 3a in which parcel access is the same as Alternative 3, but the roundabout is replaced with a U-turn bulb -out instead. Each alternative has been conceptually laid out and shown at the end of this memo. One of the constraints in locating the roundabout is to ensure it does not cross the 1-70 barrier line. Traffic Operations Sidra software was used to assess the operational aspects of a roundabout via calculating Level of Service (LOS). The analysis first assessed whether any form of a one -lane roundabout might suffice; it won't. A full two-lane roundabout is needed given the traffic numbers in Table 1. This was found to be the case for all the alternatives analyzed; two lanes are needed and would be sufficient even for those in which U -turning traffic would add demand. Further, two -lanes will be required along the Frontage Road approaches into the roundabout to achieve at least a LOS C under ideal conditions (actually, LOS B is achieved in every case). The one nuance revealed by the roundabout analysis pertains to the traffic queues that could form upon entering the roundabout. Specifically, the WB Frontage Road approach was found to potentially queue back past the parking structure entrance in Alternative 1 (more -so in Alternative 1a). This suggests that driveway access points onto the Frontage Road (that do not directly connect into the roundabout) should be located at least 125 feet from the roundabout along its entry leg. A sub -option in several of the alternatives pertains to the provision of a left -in to the VVMC. The analysis suggests that this left in movement could operate at LOS B with queues that could be accommodated in a 100 -foot lane. All the alternatives would allow flexibility in the event that this left -in movement exceeds the projection; the downstream roundabout would have excess capacity to accommodate it in the form of a U-turn. Comparisons Table 2 shows a matrix that simply highlights nuances and a few differences between the alternatives. Inbound* Outbound* Component From West From East TO West TO East VVMC 24 (50) 217 (150) 11 (10) 64 (192) Evergreen Lodge 12 (25) 47 (75) 16 (4) 64 (69) Parking Structure 40 (15) 125 (40) 10 (40) 25 (125) * AM (PM) Peak hour in vehicles per hour. **Through traffic along the Frontage Road used in this was based on latest travel demand model run in support of 1-70 Underpass project. Access Alternatives A design charette, held July 16, 2014 in Vail, resulted in three fundamental alternatives to be analyzed; each has a sub -option as well. The primary alternatives locate the roundabout in a slightly different location along the Frontage Road, and the sub -options pertain to adjustments in access locations. The exception is Alternative 3a in which parcel access is the same as Alternative 3, but the roundabout is replaced with a U-turn bulb -out instead. Each alternative has been conceptually laid out and shown at the end of this memo. One of the constraints in locating the roundabout is to ensure it does not cross the 1-70 barrier line. Traffic Operations Sidra software was used to assess the operational aspects of a roundabout via calculating Level of Service (LOS). The analysis first assessed whether any form of a one -lane roundabout might suffice; it won't. A full two-lane roundabout is needed given the traffic numbers in Table 1. This was found to be the case for all the alternatives analyzed; two lanes are needed and would be sufficient even for those in which U -turning traffic would add demand. Further, two -lanes will be required along the Frontage Road approaches into the roundabout to achieve at least a LOS C under ideal conditions (actually, LOS B is achieved in every case). The one nuance revealed by the roundabout analysis pertains to the traffic queues that could form upon entering the roundabout. Specifically, the WB Frontage Road approach was found to potentially queue back past the parking structure entrance in Alternative 1 (more -so in Alternative 1a). This suggests that driveway access points onto the Frontage Road (that do not directly connect into the roundabout) should be located at least 125 feet from the roundabout along its entry leg. A sub -option in several of the alternatives pertains to the provision of a left -in to the VVMC. The analysis suggests that this left in movement could operate at LOS B with queues that could be accommodated in a 100 -foot lane. All the alternatives would allow flexibility in the event that this left -in movement exceeds the projection; the downstream roundabout would have excess capacity to accommodate it in the form of a U-turn. Comparisons Table 2 shows a matrix that simply highlights nuances and a few differences between the alternatives. August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 3 Table 2 Roundabout Conceptual Design Options Matrix Alt. Description Notes Roundabout is located at the Roundabout will function at LOS B given ideal west end of the municipal center conditions. and would provide access into The parking structure would not be easily accessed 1 Evergreen. The parking from the west. structure would be accessed via Right-in/right out driveway from Parking Structure onto a right-in/right-out. The WMC Frontage Road may be too close to the roundabout. would be provided a 3/4 access. Retaining wall likely needed along south and west sides of roundabout. Roundabout would serve more traffic than Alt. 1, but still operate at LOS B given ideal conditions. The parking structure would not be easily accessed from the west. Roundabout is located in same EB approaching traffic into roundabout would stack past location as described above. to the Parking Structure right-in/right-out; this is more 1a The WMC would be served via critical in 1a than in 1. a right-in/right out only, other Emergency vehicles entering from the east would have than emergency traffic which a clear turn lane. could turn left into the facility. Retaining wall likely needed along south and west sides of roundabout. Possible driver expectancy issues in forcing lefts through roundabout; significant advance signage needed. Roundabout is shifted to the east (in the vortex are related to Roundabout will function at LOS B given ideal new helipad site), located conditions. roughly mid -point of the Smooth parking structure entry operations would be 2 Evergreen frontage. The required to preclude queuing into roundabout. parking structure would access directly into roundabout, and VVMC would be served via a3/4 access. Roundabout is located in the Roundabout LOS would be A given ideal conditions. same location as described Patterns through the roundabout would be simpler 2a above. The right -in to the compared to 2 (no longer accommodating an EB left parking structures is shifted to nor a WB right). the east out of the roundabout. The parking structure will not be easily accessed from the west. August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 4 Summary A two-lane roundabout will function at LOS B in ideal conditions for any of the alternatives considered. Sensitivity to access placement is needed for some alternatives such that driveways are not too close to the entry legs of the roundabout and end up being blocked at peak times. Property owners should evaluate the constraints and opportunities with respect to their needs of redevelopment towards developing a balanced solution. This memo provides additional fodder in support of additional consideration and discussion. Roundabout would function at a LOS B in ideal conditions. Roundabout is located to the May defy driver expectation given that there would not west up against Middle Creek be any kind of cross street connecting to roundabout. and is used to serve WB to EB The parking structure will not be easily accessed from u -turns (which includes left -in the west. Roundabout could also be used for EB to WB U-turns, 3 traffic for Evergreen, left -in traffic perhaps those exiting the Lionshead parking structure for VVMC, and left -out traffic desiring travel west; a right turn followed by a U-turn from parking structure). No may be easier than a left turn at peak times. direct access would be provided This option could incorporate an emergency left -in lane via the roundabout. for VVMC and/or a left -in lane to Evergreen. Retaining wall needed along south side of roundabout. Potential headwall/wing-wall work pertaining to Middle Creek. The U-turn traffic will operate at LOS C in ideal conditions, but this approach lane could see 250 -foot queues during the PM peak hour (reduced to 150 feet Roundabout is replaced with a +/- if a left -in is allowed at VVMC). This could be formal U-turn "bulb -out" area, challenging for parking structure traffic exiting that 3a which would be located in facility and needing to complete several lane changes approximately the same location in a relative short distance. as the roundabout in Alternative This option could incorporate an emergency left -in lane 3. for VVMC and/or a left -in lane to Evergreen. Retaining wall needed on south side of roundabout. Potential headwall/wing-wall work pertaining to Middle Creek. Summary A two-lane roundabout will function at LOS B in ideal conditions for any of the alternatives considered. Sensitivity to access placement is needed for some alternatives such that driveways are not too close to the entry legs of the roundabout and end up being blocked at peak times. Property owners should evaluate the constraints and opportunities with respect to their needs of redevelopment towards developing a balanced solution. This memo provides additional fodder in support of additional consideration and discussion. CO r O CL 0 fi I r� fff I m.. Q CAL, ° v � / a U) Cf) LO N 0) s cli f -M Ul "19 I To r I O 4 ` .. I t 40 C'7 i Z / O, F 0 co L. i Cf) Cf) N 0) co L d / / IT it I �m r I I � � I w I / I I ca co I z o coL. IL Cf) Cf) I O s LO /