Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-0509 PECTOWN OF VA 0)PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION FWhtFpl�f# May 9,2016, 1:00 PM Vail Town Council Chambers 75S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657 Call to Order Members Present: Brian Gillette, Ludwig Kurz, John Ryan Lockman, John Rediker, and Brian Stockmar Absent: Kirk Hansen and Henry Pratt 2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a revision to a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3)/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC16-0014) - 45 min. Action: Approve with Conditions Motion: Gillette Second: Lockman Vote: 3-1-1 (Rediker opposed, Kurz abstained) Conditions: 1. The applicant shall mitigate the employee generation impact created by the addition of 836 square feet of GRFA in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The applicant shall make the required fee in lieu payment to the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of any building permit. 2. The applicant shall receive and submit in conjunction with the building permit, all applicable Colorado Department of Transportation approvals for all impacts to the South Frontage Road East, including construction staging, if necessary. 3. The applicant shall amend the recorded condominium map to reflect the increase in floor area and space designation, prior to requesting any final planning or building inspection. 4. The applicant shall replace the three (3) existing street lights located along the Frontage Road with Town of Vail street lights per Public Work's specification. The location of the streetlights is depicted in the Streetlight Exhibit, included as Attachment C to the May 6, 2014 PEC130046 Town Council Memo. The number of new fixtures shall be determined by the Director of Public Works and will not exceed three. The new street lights shall be installed prior to requesting any final planning or building inspection. Jonathan Spence, Town Planner, presented on behalf of the Community Development Department. The proposal is to revise a previous approval granted in 2014. The previously approved exterior improvements included a new dormer on the south elevation for Unit 501, a modification to the roof for Unit 502, and another new dormer on the north elevation, also for Unit 501. Part of the 2014 approval included an agreement to replace the wood shake roof on levels four and five. The proposed changes result in a project approximately one-third of what were originally approved. In addition to the revisions to the roof, the applicant is also seeking a change to the roof replacement agreement. The current roof dates to 2007 and has approximately fifteen (15) years of life remaining. Lockman — When did the Town change the code from requiring to prohibiting wood shake roofs? Spence — The code changed in 2008, just after the applicant had installed the cedar shake roof. Rediker — Asked for clarification of the status of the formerly proposed dormers. Spence — The only roof penetrations are for skylights. The previously approved dormers on the north and south elevations are no longer proposed. Don Eggers (representing the applicant) — Unit 501 has a loft that is built within the existing volume of the roof. There is additional square footage being added underneath the existing gables. This proposal will replace some of the wood shakes with DaVinci-brand roofing, but not to the previous extent required. Gillette — Have you considered a different type of roof such as a standing seam metal roof? Eggers— The plan is to replace the majority of the roof in approximately fifteen years. There are only a few places where someone can see the area of the roof being changes. Lockman — Why are the proposed changes considered a major amendment? Spence — Due to its previous approval, felt it best to bring it back to the PEC. Rediker — What are the current cedar shake roof regulations? Spence — Since 2008 cedar shake roofs have been prohibited for new construction. Rediker — Does the code require a disturbance to the roof and an increase in GRFA to trigger the roof replacement? Spence — Yes, both are required. The question at hand is whether the change in scope of the plans necessitates the full replacement of the roof? Rediker — Asked for clarification as to whether or not the PEC was being asked to approve something that does not comply with code. Spence — The SDD allows for such a revision and would not be considered a variation. Public Comment — None Stockmar — Concurs with staff. Gillette — Concurs with staff. Lockman — Concurs with staff and other Commissioners, it would be wasteful to require a new roof when there is life left on the existing roof. Rediker — Does not see an issue with the GRFA. It is important not to overburden applicants, but at the same time it is important to maintain the letter of the law. 3. A request for final review of a Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12-61-11, Vail Town Code, to allow for the future development of Employee Housing Units on the Chamonix parcel located at 2310 Chamonix Road, Parcel B, Resubdivision of Tract D, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC150019) - 5 min. Action: Table to June 13, 2016 Motion: Lockman Second: Stockmar Vote: 5-0-0 4. A request for review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a religious institution, located at 12 Vail Road/Lots N & O, Block 5D , Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC16-0015) Withdrawn 5. Approval of Minutes April 25, 2016 PEC Meeting Results Action: Approval Motion: Stockmar Second: Lockman Vote: 3-0-2 (Gillette and Rediker abstained) 6. Informational Update Prior to the Eagle County PIan4Health presentation, and at the request of Commissioner Lockman, George Ruther gave a brief update on the Chamonix housing proposal. Rediker — Asked for information about a music festival he has heard is proposed for next year. Ruther — Internal meetings have occurred to review this type of event and what the positive and negative impacts would be. No determination has been made as to whether or not the event will occur. Rediker — Is there a way to access master plans online? Spence demonstrated where the master plans are available on the Town's website. Informational presentation by Eagle County on PIan4Health grant program and process. Presenters: Katie Haas and Kris Valdez of Eagle County Government - 15 min. Haas — Plan4Health is a program supported by the Healthy Communities Coalition and American Planning Association that is funded by the CDC with the purpose of uniting planning and public health policies. Eagle County was one of only seventeen areas selected nationwide for the $117,000 grant. The project includes six (6) Eagle River Valley communities and Eagle County itself. One of the processes of the program will be a "policy scan" to review the master plans for each of the communities. The main focus of the program is on the built environment and the impact on healthy eating and active living. Implementing successful programs across communities is another goal. The final product will be a report for each community that includes an analysis of existing policies and recommendations for the future. The projected completion date for the project is by the end of the calendar year. Gillette — What does healthy food access look like? Haas — Examples include zoning ordinances that allow for community gardens and farmers' markets. Rediker— Is there healthy eating educational component as part of this project? Haas — There are other initiatives regarding public education, but this project focuses on policies impacting the built environment. Rediker — Who is the subcontractor working on this project? Haas — Will Kerns of Open Plan Consultants. Rediker — What are some of the things that may have already been identified that the Town can work on? Haas — The process has not been completed yet for each specific community, but one area discussed regarding all communities is community outreach and including diversity in public participation. More specific recommendations will be available in early fall. Lockman — Will there be a presentation made as to where community policies are consistent and or inconsistent with each other? Haas — The review will include a presentation of possible synergies among communities. Stockmar —Will Vail's medical and physical therapy resources be involved? Haas — It is an asset that can be recognized, but is not sure yet where it fits into the master plan level review. 7. Adjournment Action: Approval Motion: Kurz Second: Lockman Vote: 5-0-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 48-hour notification. Please call (970) 479- 2356, Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD), for information. Community Development Department Published in the Vail Daily May 6, 2016 TOW?J OF VAi ` VAI LTOWN PLANNINGAND ENVI RONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 9, 2016 ITEM/TOPIC: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a revision to a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC16-0014) ATTACHMENTS: File Name PEC 160014_Staff_Memo. pdf PEC 16-0014 Applicant_Narrative 3-10-2016.pdf PEC16-0014_Plan_Set 3-10-2016.pdf PEC130046_Staff Memo with Att..pdf PEC—Minutes 4-14-2014.pdf Description PEC16-0014 Staff Memorandum PEC16-0014 Applicant Narrative, 3-10-2016 PEC16-0014 Plan Set, 3-10-2016 PEC 130046 Staff Memorandum with Att, 4-14-2014 PEC Meeting Minutes, 4-14-2014 10114119119 Memorandum To: Planning and Environmental Commission From: Community Development Department Date: May 9, 2016 Subject: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a revision to a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Drive, Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC16-0014) Applicant: Lublan S.A., represented by Eggers Architect Planner: Jonathan Spence SUMMARY The applicant, Lublan S.A, represented by Eggers Architecture, Inc., is requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a revision to a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3). The subject units received approval from the Vail Town Council, via Ordinance No. 11, Series 2014, for an increase in GRFA utilizing two new roof projections. This approval followed a unanimous recommendation from the Planning and Environmental Commission on April 14, 2014. The applicant is requesting a revision to this approval, described in greater detail below in Section II, that result in a decrease in the overall scope and scale of the project. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval, with conditions, of a revision to the major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) No. 6, Vail Village Inn, subject to the findings noted in Section VIII of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The owners of units 501 and 502, Lublan S.A., represented by Eggers Architecture, Inc., are requesting a revision to the previously approved amendment to Special Development District No. 6. The proposed revisions and consistencies with the original approval are as follows: Unit 501 Unit 502 Unit 501 is proposing to not make the exterior changes to the building as previously approved, but to only add ten (10) skylights to the exterior. • Unit 501 is proposing to add 264 square feet of GRFA vs. the 277 square feet previously approved. The proposed increase in GRFA will be within the existing mass and scale of the building. The changes to Unit 501 could be processed as an Interior Conversions application, not necessitatina a PEC or Town Council review. • Unit 502 is proposing to keep the previously approved exterior changes. • Unit 502 is proposing adding an additional 57 square feet on the main level from existing attic space. Roof Material The previous approval included the replacement of the existing cedar shake roofing on levels four and five with DaVinci synthetic shakes. This also included DaVinci shakes on the new roof projections. As the project no longer includes the dormer/gable element for Unit 501, the applicant is proposing DaVinci shakes on only the Unit 502 shed dormer. The applicant is proposing not to replace the existing wood shakes on the remainder of roof at this time. Other Improvements The application, consistent with the original approval, includes the replacement of the existing street lights located along the Frontage Road with new lights that meet Town of Vail Specifications. The applicant has provided a written description of their request, (Attachment A) and plans, (Attachment B), both dated March 10, 2016. Town of Vail Page 2 III. BACKGROUND In 1976, the Vail Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1976, establishing Special Development District No.6, Vail Village Inn. The purpose of SDD No.6 is to assure the comprehensive development and use of an area of land in a manner that would be harmonious with the general character of the town, provide adequate open space and recreation amenities, and promote the objectives of the zoning ordinance of the town. Ordinarily, a special development district will be created only when the development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, and Design Review Board, and there are significant aspects of the development which cannot be satisfied under the existing zoning. Project History: The following is a summary of the existing phases and development for the Vail Village Inn Special Development District (SDD No. 6): Phase I- This phase consists of the buildings located at the southeast corner of the District. Phase I includes one residential dwelling unit approximately 3,927 square feet in size and nine commercial/retail spaces. The original development plan for Phase I called for 16,128 square feet of commercial space, and no GRFA. The Alpenrose Restaurant is part of Phase 1. Phase 11- This phase consists of three residential dwelling units totaling approximately 3,492 square feet in size and three commercial/retail spaces. Phase II is generally located in the center of the District and includes the Claggett-Rey Gallery. Phase III- This Phase consists of twenty-nine residential dwelling units totaling approximately 44,830 square feet in size and six commercial/retail spaces. Phase III is located at the northeast corner of the District. Phase IV- This is the original, oldest and most recently redeveloped Phase in the District. This Phase (The Sebastian) consists of two residential dwelling units totaling approximately 6,827 square feet in size, one hundred accommodation units and forty-nine fractional fee units comprising approximately 97,788 square feet of floor area. Phase IV is generally located in the northwest corner of the District. Phase V- This Phase consists of eleven residential dwelling units and three accommodation units totaling approximately 9,972 square feet of floor area and four commercial/retail spaces. Phase V is located in the southwest corner of the District at the intersection of Vail Road and East Meadow Drive. This phase includes the La Botega restaurant. Town of Vail Page 3 Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1985 (March, 1985) granted 120,600 square feet of GRFA to SDD No. 6. This ordinance also required a minimum of 175 accommodation units (AUs) and 72,400 square feet of GRFA, devoted entirely to AUs in Phase IV. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1987 (May, 1987), amended Phase IV of SDD No. 6. The amendment allowed Phase IV to be broken into two distinct and separate phases, which were called Phase IV and Phase V. This ordinance also set the maximum GRFA for the SDD at 120,600 square feet. Further, the ordinance required a minimum of 148 AUs and 67,367 square feet of GRFA devoted to AUs in Phases IV and V. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1989 (November, 1989) amended the density section of SDD No. 6. This ordinance modified the SDD by increasing the allowable GRFA to a total of 124,527 square feet. This allowed Unit No. 30 (originally Good's retail) in the Vail Village Plaza Condominiums to be converted from commercial to residential use. The space consists of 3,927 square feet of GRFA, and the conversion to residential use has been completed. This ordinance also maintained the approval for a minimum of 148 AUs and 67,367 square feet of GRFA, devoted to AUs, in Phases IV and V of SDD No.6. Ordinance No. 1 and No. 4, Series of 2000, a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 was approved to allow for construction of the Vail Plaza Hotel. Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2001 adopted a revised Approved Development Plan for Phase II, which brought the total allowable GRFA for the entire SDD No. 6 to 182,325 square feet. Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2001 adopted a revised Approved Development Plan for Phase IV (i.e. Vail Plaza Hotel), and did not specify, in the form of a revised Approved Development Plan, the total allowable GRFA for the entirety of SDD No. 6. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2003, adopted a major amendment to SDD No. 6, allowing for the construction of a new dwelling unit above the Alpenrose Restaurant location, which increase the amount of allowable GRFA for the entire SDD to 184,708 sq. ft. and increase the density to 13 DU's per acre. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2005, adopted a major amendment to SDD No. 6, revising the amount of allowable GRFA for the entire SDD to 186,561 sq. ft. and increasing the density to 13.25 DU's per acre. Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014, adopted a major amendment to SDD No. 6, revising the allowable GRFA for Phase III to facilitate additions to Units 501 and 502. It is this major amendment that the applicant is requesting to revise. Town of Vail Page 4 IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS A. Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code CHAPTER 12-1, TITLE, PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY (in part) Section 12-1-2. Purpose.- A. urpose.A. General. These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town, and to promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. B. Specific. These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific purposes.- 1. urposes. 1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. 2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other dangerous conditions. 3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets. 4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off-street parking and loading facilities. 5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic values. 6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with Municipal development objectives. 7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures. 8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the Town. 9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable natural features. 10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters. 11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. ARTICLE 12-9A, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (in part) 12-9A-1: Purpose and Applicability: A. Purpose. The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use, to improve the design character and quality of the new development with the town, to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of Town of Vail Page 5 streets and utilities, to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas, and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail comprehensive plan. An approved development plan for a special development district, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the special development district. B. Applicability: Special development districts do not apply to and are not available in the following zone districts. hillside residential, single-family residential, two-family residential and two-family primary/secondary residential. 12-9A-10: AMENDMENT PROCEDURES.- B. ROCEDURES. 8. Major Amendments.- 1. mendments. 1. Requests for major amendments to an approved special development district shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures described in section 12- 9A-4 of this article. 2. Owners of all property requesting the amendment, or their agents or authorized representatives, shall sign the application. Notification of the proposed amendment shall be made to owners of all property adjacent to the property requesting the proposed amendment, owners of all property adjacent to the special development district, and owners of all property within the special development district that may be affected by the proposed amendment (as determined by the department of community development). Notification procedures shall be as outlined in subsection 12-3-6C of this title. V. SURROUNDING LAND USES North South East: West: Town of Vail Land Uses CDOT right-of-way Mixed Use Mixed Use Multiple Family Zoning Not Zoned Public Accommodation SDD #39 (Solaris) SDD #21 (Gateway) Page 6 VI. ZONING ANALYSIS/SDD #6, VAIL VILLAGE INN, PHASE III Development Existing/Approved 2014 Approval 2016 Amendment Change Standard prior to 2014 Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014 Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) Unit 501 2,467 sq. ft. 2,744 sq. ft. (+277) 2,731 sq. ft. (+264) -13 sq. ft. Unit 502 1,399 sq. ft. 1,914 sq. ft. (+515) 1,971 sq. ft. (+572) +57 sq. ft. Total Phase 46,067 sq. ft. 46,859 sq. ft. (+792) 46,903 sq. ft. (+836) +44 sq. ft. III SDD #6 Parking 108 spaces 108 spaces No change No change 1.4 spaces per 1.4 spaces per unit unit Dwelling 11 Dwelling Units 11 Dwelling Units No change No change Units (DUs) Height 5 stories (74.3' 5 stories (74.3' per Removal of planned No change per SDD) SDD) (new roof west dormer/gable elements @ 67.6') Site 55% (per SDD) 38% No change No change Coverage Landscaping 30% (per SDD) 57% No change No change VII. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Before acting on an application for a major amendment to a special development district, the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposal: 1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. In contrast to other phases of SDD #6, Vail Village Inn, Phase III has seen relatively few amendments. The structure has seen minor changes since its original construction, mainly exterior window updates and interior remodels, but remains largely unchanged from its original build. Town of Vail Page 7 The roof changes contained in the original 2014 application were found to be compatible with the neighborhood related to architectural design and style. The application was also found to meet the guidelines recommended in the Vail Village Urban Design Standards by locating the infill out of sun/shade or views as illustrated by the drawings contained on pages 7-8 of the April 14, 2014 PEC Staff Memorandum, included as Attachment C. The amendment no longer includes the proposed dormer/gable element on the western side of the roof, and instead includes only flush mounted skylights in its place, as shown below. The 2014 approval included alterations or impacts to approximately 1, 415 square foot of roof area. With the removal of the western dormer, the quantity of roofing proposed to be altered is reduced to approximately 410 square feet. Figure #1 shows the existing conditions, Figure #2 the previously approved elevation and Figure #3, as now proposed. Figure #1 �prer_rwuu.wr __ X CID . LL IM i _ --- __ � lill!lilgl ------------------------------------------------- 5CUTI-4 ELEVATION - Ex15TING Town of Vail Page 8 Figure #2 Figure #3 - --------- - 4 SOUTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED Town of Vail Page 9 A - n.._ 91 E ILI a In 50UTH ELEVATION - PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SOUTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED Town of Vail Page 9 Consistent with earlier findings, staff finds the proposal does comply with this criterion. 2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The applicant does not propose to change any of the uses, activity, or densities which are currently constructed within the project. The proposal to increase the allowable GRFA within the SDD requires mitigation of the impacts to employee generation pursuant to Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The applicant has stated in their written materials that the pay -in -lieu option would be selected if the proposal were approved. An increase in the allowable GRFA by 836 square feet results in a pay -in -lieu fee of $11,256.74 (836 sq. ft. x 10% x $134.65) under the existing adopted fee schedule. The required payment is calculated at the time of building permit submittal and may be different than the number above. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. The proposal to add 836 square feet of GRFA to Units 501 and 502 do not change the required parking or loading and delivery requirements for the development. As a component of the approval for the Sebastian, its developer was required to provide a centralized loading and delivery facility for the use of all owners and tenants within SDD #6 and also to be made available for public and/or private loading and delivery programs. The continued use of this facility is vital in mitigating the loading and delivery impacts upon Vail Village. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. Staff has reviewed the Vail comprehensive plan and found the following documents and associated goals, objectives, statements applicable to this proposal. Vail Land Use Plan (in part) 1. General Growth / Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. Town of Vail Page 10 1. 12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 4. Village Core / Lionshead 4.2 Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing character of each area is preserved through implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan. 4.3 The ambiance of the Village is important to the identity of Vail and should be preserved. (Scale, alpine character, small town feeling, mountains, natural settings, intimate size, cosmopolitan feeling, environmental quality.) 5. Residential 5.1. Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. Vail Village Master Plan (in part) V. GOALS. OBJECTIVES. POLICIES AND ACTION STEPS GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY. Obiective 1.1: Implement a consistent development review process to reinforce the character of the Village. Policy 1.1.1: Development and improvement projects approved in the Village shall be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and design considerations as outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide Plan. Obiective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide Plan. VII. VAIL VILLAGE SUB -AREAS Town of Vail Page 11 A major goal of this Plan is to address the Village as a whole and at the same time be sensitive to the opportunities and constraints that may exist on a site specific basis. To facilitate long range planning unique to each area of the Village, ten different sub -areas are delineated in this Plan. Sub -areas were determined based on a number of different considerations. Foremost among these were. design and site characteristics geographic or physical boundaries land uses and ownership patterns Each of the ten sub -areas have been evaluated relative to the overall goals, objectives, and policies outlined for Vail Village. The potential improvement projects, referred to as sub -area concepts, which have emerged from this evaluation are graphically represented on the Action Plan. These sub -area concepts are physical improvements intended to reinforce the desired physical form of the Village as outlined in the various elements of the Master Plan. The 10 sub -areas (which follow), provide detailed descriptions of each sub -area concept and express the relationship between the specific sub -area concepts and the overall Plan. The applicable goals and objectives are cited for each of the sub area concepts at the end of each description under "special emphasis. " The sub -area concepts described in this Section are meant to serve as advisory guidelines for future land use decisions by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council. Compliance with the sub -area concepts does not assure development approval by the Town. It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for those proposals that can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan. The Urban Design Guide Plan includes additional design detail that is to be used in conjunction with the Vail Village Master Plan sub -area concepts. Town of Vail Page 12 I 'd MIXED USE SUB -AREA (#1) 1( ;`lll: I I I SE . I w 1La F b. - w u 1.'4� .r ■ ,3_740 'i. G "e°.oma bLR6 ... r "• 1316 arr . rr'I r z , • 1 _ 12 M.. .� S noel 5c.. -- � N hLLOW Hl CH FAIT�1 ` W. i" uu frya pEL 1 1 ..... y _ 90,3F n The Mixed -Use sub -area is a prominent activity center for Vail Village. It is distinguished from the Village core by the larger scale buildings and by the limited auto traffic along East Meadow Drive. Comprised of five major development projects, this sub -area is characterized by a mixture of residential/lodging and commercial activity. The Vail Comprehensive Plan elements that speak to this site include the Vail Land Use Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan. Staff believes the proposed changes do not have an overall negative impact on the intent of stepping buildings up from the pedestrian oriented East Meadow Drive to the South Frontage Road East. The revised proposal is consistent with the infill recommendations of the Vail Village Urban Design Guidelines. The additions are located such that their impacts on adjacent properties and on the pedestrian experience are minimal to nonexistent. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. Town of Vail Page 13 5. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, is not located within any identified geologic hazard. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The proposal does not include any changes to the site plan, building footprint design or location, or open space provisions. The proposal does include modifications to the roof plan that will allow the greater utilization of the top floor residential units. The new roof elements are designed to be compatible both with the existing structure and the overall design of the district. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation. The proposal does not include any changes to the pedestrian or vehicular circulation on or off site. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. The proposal does not include any changes to the landscaping or open space on the site as identified on the approved development plan. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. The proposal is intended to be constructed in one phase. Staging for any construction related activity will be reviewed by the Town of Vail staff to ensure impacts are Town of Vail Page 14 minimized to public rights-of-way and adjacent properties. It is anticipated that the use of the South Frontage Road East right-of-way will be necessary. This right-of-way is controlled by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and will require all appropriate review and permits from CDOT should the project move forward. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. VIII. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The Vail Town Code requires all proposals within Special Development Districts to meet the following code provision: 12-9A-9 Development Standards Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the town council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the recommendations of the planning and environmental commission. Before the town council approves development standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to the town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based on evaluation of the proposed special development district's compliance with the design criteria outlined in section 12-9A-8 of this article. The 2014 approval included the replacement of the existing cedar shake roofing on building levels four and five in conjunction with the dormer/gable addition to Unit #501 and the shed dormer for Unit #502. With the elimination of the western dormer/gable element and the resulting decrease in proposed changes to the roof, the applicant has no longer included the proposed shingle replacement as a component of this project. Staff believes that there are no recognizable adverse effects of the proposed deviations to allowable GRFA. Staff finds that the elimination of the proposed shingle replacement does not result in the project noncompliance this requirement. It should be noted that Village Inn Plaza Phase III completed a rehabilitation of many of its exterior, pedestrian level elements in 2009. Phase I and II are anticipated to act on a recent DRB approval to complete these improvements in the district that include new pavers, site walls, ADA access and landscaping. Although not tied to this proposal, these improvements demonstrate Vail Village Inn's commitment to maintaining and improving public spaces. Town of Vail Page 15 IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the Town Council on a revision to a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Drive, Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria described in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval, with conditions, for this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval to the Town Council for a revision to a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval, with conditions, for this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission applies the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall mitigate the employee generation impact created by the addition of 836 square feet of GRFA in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The applicant shall make the required fee in lieu payment to the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of any building permit. 2. The applicant shall receive and submit in conjunction with the building permit, all applicable Colorado Department of Transportation approvals for all impacts to the South Frontage Road East, including construction staging, if necessary. 3. The applicant shall amend the recorded condominium map to reflect the increase in floor area and space designation, prior to requesting any Town of Vail Page 16 final planning or building inspection. 4. The applicant shall replace the three (3) existing street lights located along the Frontage Road with Town of Vail street lights per Public Work's specification. The location of the streetlights is depicted in the Streetlight Exhibit, included as Attachment C to the May 6, 2014 PEC130046 Town Council Memo. The number of new fixtures shall be determined by the Director of Public Works and will not exceed three. The new street lights shall be installed prior to requesting any final planning or building inspection. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval, with conditions, for this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: 'Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section Vll this Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated May 9, 2016, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds.- 1. inds. 1. That the special development district amendment complies with the standards listed Article 12-9A, Special Development District, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. 2. That the special development district amendment is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town, and 3. That the special development district amendment is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas, and 4. That the special development district amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality." Town of Vail Page 17 X. ATTACHMENTS A. PEC16-0014 Applicant Narrative, B. PEC16-0014 Plan Set, 3-10-201 E C. PEC130046 Staff Memorandum, D. PEC Meeting Minutes, 4-14-2014 3-10-2016 with Attachments, 4-14-2014 Town of Vail Page 18 Village Inn Plaza Vail Village Inn, SDD #6, Phase III Major Amendment to Special District No. 6 Expansion of Units 501 & 502 with Exterior Modifications March 10, 2016 1-050 Bf=,ff Z A MM SOTff200 AffAwl AWOVA 1"Z11 D1 m tzvj x.2860 '-" IPM) A"W EGGERS ARCHITECTURE, INC. PO BOX 798 KREMMLING, CO 80459 (970)724-3411 FAX: (970) 724-3412 don.eggers@eggersarchitecture.com I. Introduction The owners of units 501 and 502, Lublan S.A., represented by Loguer Design and Eggers Architecture, Inc., are requesting an amendment to the previously approved Amended Special Development District No.6 (SDD#6). Unit 501 (parcel #: 2101-082-54-027) is proposing to not make the major exterior changes to the building as previously approved, but to only add skylights to the exterior. Unit 501 is proposing to add 264 square feet to the GRFA vs. the 277 square feet previously approved. Unit 502 (parcel #: 2101-082-54- 028) is proposing to keep the previously approved exterior changes and adding an additional 57 square feet of GRFA. The Unit 502 approval included an increase to the GRFA by 515 square feet and the inclusion the addition of secondary roof form. The modification of Unit 502 also included the relocation of an existing mechanical mezzanine to a newly constructed area with a net square footage loss of 49 square feet. According to Section 12-9A-2: Definitions, Vail Town Code, an increase of GRFA is considered a Major SDD Amendment. Unit 501 is proposing to undergo a complete interior remodel. The current plan includes 4 bedrooms, 4 baths and major living spaces on the main level of 2145 square feet. This plan has a loft area overlooking the main living space that includes 322 square feet. The remodel proposes to redesign the main level with an entry area expanded in to the common hallway between units 501 and 502. The new square footage of the main level will be 2255 square feet, an increase of 110 square feet from the HOA Common Area. Additionally, the loft area will be remodeled with an additional 154 square feet of GRFA added from existing attic space. Total new GRFA will be 2731 square feet, representing an increase of 264 square feet. The previously approved changes included 277 square feet of additional GRFA. Unit 502 is proposing to maintain the previously approved remodel and addition of 515 square feet to the GRFA. The current proposal also includes adding an additional 57 square feet of space on the main level from existing attic space. The previously approved roof element is above the main ridgeline of the building but lower than the two elevator tower units on each side of the dormer. This element would remain and the roofing in this area only is proposed as DaVinci synthetic shake. The new proposal would bring the total GRFA of the unit to 1971 square feet, a total increase in the GRFA of 572 square feet. Floor plans of the proposed changes are provided below: - --------- 6WLWML It -- - ----------- rl • J,j - ------- MW ------ --- ------------------ F1 na --- - --------- --------- ----------- --- ES �¢^.FG&_T' , F_C F, _EYL W It rl ---­--­---- --- ------------------ ------------ ---T ----------- --- ----------------------- - ------------ &TOO- El ----------------- A1.3 II. Background Village Inn Plaza is located at 100 East Meadow Drive. The property is part of Phase III of Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn. This SDD has an underlying zoning of SDD #6 was adopted by Ordinance No. 7 of 1976 and has undergone multiple amendments since is adoption. Most of the amendments have been associated with the other phases of the SDD. The structure has seen minor changes since its original construction, mainly exterior window updates and interior remodels, but remains largely unchanged from its original construction. The proposed modifications will be add some exterior detail and update the appearance of the building to match the architectural detailing of the more recently constructed adjacent properties. See photo of the frontage road view taken from the north side of the highway: Vail Village Inn deviates from the maximum height limitation set forth in the Public Accommodation zone district of 48 feet for sloped roofs. Building heights were defined by number of stories in the original adoption of SDD#6 and further illustrated in a drawing created by consultants Royston, Hanamoto, Beck and Abey dated February 12, 1976. The building was constructed according to these height restrictions and has not been modified since. The previously approved roof mass over unit 502 is lower than the adjacent elevator shaft elements, therefore not affecting the overall building height. See drawing below: - INNNIH 9 �••'�`��••- There are no additional parking requirements as the number of units is not changing. III. Zoning Analysis The proposed modification only affects the GRFA and Employee Housing standards of the zoning analysis. All other standards are unchanged and remain as approved by Special Development District #6. Standard Existing Previously Approved Proposed GRFA Unit 501 2467 sf 2744 sf (+277) 2731 sf (+264) Unit 502 1399 sf 1914 sf (+515) 1971 sf (+572) Parking 1.4 per unit no change no change Employee Housing Approved prior 79 sf (pay -in -lieu) 83 sf (pay -in -lieu) to Inclusionary Requirement IV. Criteria for Review for the Major Amendment to a Special Development District Section 12-9A-8: Design Criteria and Necessary Findings in the Vail Town Code provides the criteria for review of a Major Amendment to a Special Development District. Below is a listing of the criteria and how the proposal complies with each: 1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. Proposed: The architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation remains largely unchanged as a result of the proposed amendment. The roof changes fit between the existing elements, therefore the height remains the same as constructed. 2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Proposed: There is no change to the use, activity or number of dwelling units within the proposed amendment. The increase is GRFA is consistent with the intent of Chapter 15 of the Vail Town Code and without the size of the roof elements would qualify as a minor amendment to the SDD. 3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. Proposed: The addition of GRFA does not affect the parking requirements for the units and is unchanged. 4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. Proposed: Village Inn Plaza is within the boundaries of the Vail Village Master Plan and further located within Mixed Use Sub -Area #1. The following objectives of the master plan are applicable to this application: Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities Objective 2.5: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. 5. Natural And/Or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements. 6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements as there are no changes proposed for the site plan. 7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements. 8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements. 9. Workable Plan. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements. V. Photo images: Below are images taken from Meadow Drive and the Frontage Road. The proposed improvements are not visible from other locations within the Village. From Meadow Dr. VI. Adjacent Property Owners Vail Gateway Plaza Condo Association c/o Vail Tax & Accounting PO Box 5940 Avon, CO 81620 Vail Plaza Hotel (Sebastian) c/o Timbers Resorts 16 Vail Road Vail, CO 81657 Village Inn Plaza Phase 1,11,V c/o Jonathon Staufer, Manager 100 E. Meadow Drive, #31 Vail, CO 81657 Solaris c/o Peter Noble, John Boord 2211 N. Frontage Road, Suite A Vail, CO 81657 One Willow Bridge Road Condo Association c/o Corporation Service Company 1560 Broadway, Suite 2090 Denver, CO 80202 One Willow Bridge Road Condo Association 4148 N Arcadia Drive Phoenix, AZ 85018 Talisman Condo Association c/o Ptarmigan Management 62 E. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Sonnenalp c/o Johannes Faessler 20 Vail Road Vail, CO 81657 oavxo10o `1IV A NM 3JV11LA 11VA '9# QQS `£ 3SVHd � gni aa�i aaTH�av SOCKOo KKTHOVIITA `Z%)8 TOS SLTNfT ZrJZ�CI S2i�1J1J� NOISNV dXd W 'IdQOWTIN OQNOO .�, a3nssi � ' a TTT �,n r l O x4 r. V z 0 I� '^ rell �asoo''�i�acoo. � ? Q c7 � F F- G F � 1G• v , 'x cC� W xxwxz W FW 0 1 F \I l V �� W H O � rr N P ya � W yCV � d Soao�z Wn���C c"i `wa. mV-9010:)9V _ - — .. NNImVI'11VwyawE»VH: \ ma m NNI 2VI z a;+ m;s K &OSKva&3 2 gaoOaaw QORODainssiQ \ \ > ° m / | | q � � m B k www z:\w: U- Ll §-- ƒ § ' ° � k � « : -------------- \ m; \7\A , <------- - `----- ) : \ \} \/ , ----- – 4 � — \\–©-----� - «- - , ------------ w§_ \ ~ m w o \ &--- R \ \_ ( § '_ ❑ \^--- / _ 3 / G @ \. m; | § Oavx010O'IIVA N �r N[vI HJVIIIA TVA .94 QQS _E HSVHd Jx `axnLJaitxJxd SOQNOD NNH 19VI TA 705 V 105 SIINfl r NOISNVdX3 )S "I 1(10NMd OGNOD a3nssi Q a ------------ 9 l c a ; T ' a i' ----------------- _ Y T�®y__ x 777 E -- -- L ❑ /�v � T -T T-T'i IiIT ❑ T n/ L_J L_J"L_J L -T _J Q _ � Q --------��--------T LL _ LL I = B 9 e LL TL }8 r I I 'I I _ 3 O \ / I I I i Q E e W LU 'T T -TT- it 3[ LL z TII - Q LL LL ❑ i ° ua § � a 9 I ' I mV -9010:) 9V _ - — .. NNI HDVIIIA IIVwyawE»VH: \ ma m NNI 2VI z a;+ m;s K &OSKva&3 2 gaoOaaw QORODainssiQ % ) q------- k B § LLI. | -------------- «� — [ ---\. [ R [ � e h ---- z»w» ?w»w (------------ zzzzzzzzz: uj ¥ q o / :---------- - _ . . §§r - � zwww: 2� §_ _ LL , �\ �\ � , � \ | | -- \ ------\\\\\\_ \ | e� ---- , ©yy � y) z ---- §. ----\� ww�����z: ------------::: _ „ . { | ------------- � , Oavx010O'IIVA .94 _E N[vI HJVIIIA IIVA QQS HSVHd Jx `axnLJaitxJxd SOQNOD NNII 19VITA 705 V 105 SIINfl r NOISNVdX3 )S "I�IQONMd OGNOD Q a3nssi �o ww a-- -------------------- N;a� 0 ajw� _ai��z o oZQ owK 0 rcaorcoa ----- ------------ ---------- ---- ------------- --- ---------- ------- - -- -------- ---- ' '' S1H91�Ay,S � 1-� ', 7113H1NA5 7N nVO ', ', o3fIKJd (l} ---------- __ _ _---------__ _- _- - _- _- -' 'Q S1M911A�5 a3a'3mOd Q ', d'OIOS f113N a Y _ ---------- ---------- �� 1 7 q ------ ---- ------------- ------- -------- ------- -- ----- ---------- ---- ---- ---- - - --- ---------- ---- --- -- ------- --- ---------- - :pi Z9 ---------------- ------------- ------------ - - --- ----- ll- O O ------------- v Z V/ q G mV-9010:)9VLO _ - - .. NNImVITVwyawE»VH: ma m � 2� z a;+ m;s K \ � &OSKva&3 2 gaoOaaw QOROD Q 1�\ %!.m L M \ \( \ O A ± > O Im y L L Pisa / w m % m y� � L; Oavx010O'llVA .94 _E N[vI HJVIIIA TVA QQS HSVHd Jx `axnLJaitxJxd SOQNOD NNH 19VI TA 705 W 105 SIINfl r NOISNVdX3 )S "I 1(10NMd OGNOD Q a3nssi @Y YY Y i 9 lu ell lu -------------- g [ T I 3a �yp¢a� s If T—TTT g �® � i i LU /,L v f T—T T—T ❑\ IrTII IT' L_J L_J' iLy L_� — --------�`--------� J A LLi i i LU Q �® _ s 7EIfJ1 e � I a OCVx010O'IIVn N NNI HJVIIIA HIV n .94 QQS _E HSVHd ��'aan �aiix�iv SOCNOO NNi 19VITA 705 V Ios SZINn (V L=r==—P NOISNVdX3 )S'I 1(10NMd OGNOD a3nssi Q t. 21E::q �I SII @III i ! ! ; a- ai i i W z LU Ep IRE w w > 4 LU H! ESLu i i i o i �CE I I I IME s i l l CEi__ g i I fig ;I ��'aan �aiix�iv OCVx010O'IIVn NNI HJVIIIA HIV n .94 QQS _E HSVHd SOCNOO NNi 19VITA 705 W Ios SZINn co (V L=rW=—P NOISNVdX3 )S'I 1(10NMd OGNOD Q a3nssi I sl s! I I I I I I I I gl si I I I I I I I I I I oAll I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I IMIL�� o I I o o j alI ( II I I���aie I I --To ---7 i z 0FIH� E o j j d 3x� o � o I I o r > o D I t I o r > a�� U LLU = = I I oz3 i i I I j I I j I j I I o I I I I =i �I EI CEI I j I �I I C I I I I i I I =I I I En I �I I CD �I 0 L I I I I i i I i I I I j i❑ I o I o I ❑ I i I i I I I I I I sl n1 =1: al al J al al sl ;I z al al =1 al I ,I al al OCVN010:) '1IVn NNI HJVIIIA 1IV n .94 QQS .E HSVHd ��'aan �aiix�iv SOCNOO NNi 19VITA 705 V Ios SZINn (V L=r==—P NOISNVdX3 )S'I 1(10NMd OGNOD a3nssi Q tlI sl zl ;I ;II al cj I as1 T I OT -1— --F-----TF- r I LU o —a -------- — - ---- ---- o o m I I i Lu > I i o io 11 x�EIEIEIE ET 4 F—Fo —� - w -- i = W iii1 11 phi 11 rhi III rh III i1 i I i I I I i i I i I I i i I i i — — i— — — — — ---- ----+ j j l j i i I i i i i i i OCVNO1O:) '1IVn Lq NNI HJVIIIA 11VA'94 (IQS _E HSVHd O,I'aan oar.. v SOCNOO NNi HJVTTIA'zos V 10s SZINn (V T. rJ'L�CI SWIDDI NOISNVdXA )S "IdIGONMI OGNOD ..n�ncci I I I I I I —_ MOM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I —_ —— I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I § s I I I I I I I I �I rl :I J 91 al �I al �I 7 51 � I 0-1----i— T _7 F I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 91 51 z z Z < C) 0 < < 0 _ = o� ��� ° C) < L) -- oTLE zz< z - Z > z t M <Z� CD < - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OP - - - . . . WHO ;j o z 0 a"� . Qt S vri m§ 3Y ^� �� W � � \ z2 Pb >O Z Iz < 0 > TOWN OF VAII: Memorandum To: Planning and Environmental Commission From: Community Development Department Date: April 14, 2014 Subject: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to a Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12- 9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot C, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130046) Applicant: Deltec Bank and Trust, represented by Eggers Architect Planner: Jonathan Spence I. SUMMARY The applicant, Deltec Bank and Trust, represented by Eggers Architect, is requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow, Units 501 and 502, (Vail Village Inn, Phase 3). Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval, with conditions, of the major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) No. 6, Vail Village Inn, subject to the findings noted in Section VIII of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is proposing to add approximately 277 square feet of GRFA to Unit 501 and approximately 515 square feet of GRFA to Unit 502. Components of this project include: The main floor entrance of Unit 501 will expand into the existing common area, capturing 103 square feet of floor area. This expansion coincides with a complete interior remodel of that level. + The existing 322 square foot loft of Unit 501 is proposed to be remodeled to include a bedroom suite and loft area with an increase of 174 square feet. • A new roof element is being added to Unit 501 to meet egress requirements for the bedroom suite and loft area. The roof will present as a dormer on the north elevation and as a gable end element on the south elevation. The ridgeline of the proposed gable matches the existing ridgeline of the building. • The existing 5th floor deck of Unit 501 is proposed to be enlarged to coincide with the new roof element. + Unit 502 is proposing an interior remodel that includes a new loft in the attic area above the unit currently occupied by a suspended mechanical mezzanine. The mechanicals will be relocated and the 515 square foot loft will consist of an exercise room with an attached bath and steam room. • A shed dormer is proposed to provide natural lighting to the new loft area of Unit 502. This dormer bridges the existing tower elements and is approximately three (3) feet above the existing ridge. • All new roof elements and the existing roofs of levels four and five will be clad in DaVinci Shakes. The existing roof was shingled with natural wood shakes in 2005. The remaining wood shingle elements in existence on levels two and three will be replaced in the future with DaVinci Shakes to match. • Replacement of the existing outdated street lights located along the Frontage Road with lights that meet. Town of Vail specifications. The applicant has provided a written description of their request, (Attachment. A) and plans, (Attachment B), both dated April 4, 2014. III. BACKGROUND In 1976, the Vail Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1976, establishing Special Development District No -6, Vail Village Inn. The purpose of SDD No.6 is to assure the comprehensive development and use of an area of land in a manner that would be harmonious with the general character of the town, provide adequate open space and recreation amenities, and promote the objectives of the zoning ordinance of the town. Ordinarily, a special development district will be created only when the development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, and Design Review Board, and there are significant aspects of the development which cannot be satisfied under the existing zoning. Town of Vail Page 2 Project History: The following is a summary of the existing phases and development for the Vail Village Inn Special Development District (SDD No. 6): Phase I- This phase consists of the buildings located at the southeast ccrner of the District. Phase I includes one residential dwelling unit approximately 3,927 square feet in size and nine commercial/retail spaces. The original development plan for Phase I called for 16,128 square feet of commercial space, and no GRFA. The Alpenrose Restaurant is part of Phase 1. Phase II- This phase consists of three residential dwelling units totaling approximately 3,492 square feet in size and three commercial/retail spaces. Phase it is generally located in the center of the District and includes the Claggett-Rey Gallery. Phase III- This Phase consists of twenty-nine residential dwelling units totaling approximately 44,830 square feet in size and six commercial/retail spaces. Phase III is located at the northeast corner of the District. Phase IV- This is the original, oldest and most recently redeveloped Phase in the District. This Phase (The Sebastian) consists of two residential dwelling units totaling approximately 6,827 square feet in size, one hundred accommodation units and forty-nine fractional fee units comprising approximately 97,788 square feet of floor area. Phase IV is generally located in the northwest corner cf the District. Phase V- This Phase consists of eleven residential dwelling units and three accommodation units totaling approximately 9,972 square feet of floor area and four commercial/retail spaces. Phase V is located in the southwest corner of the District at the intersection of Vail Road and East Meadow Drive. This phase includes the La Botega restaurant. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1985 (March, 1985) granted 120,600 square feet of GRFA to SDD No. 6. This ordinance also required a minimum of 175 accommodation units (AUs) and 72,400 square feet of GRFA, devoted entirely to AUs in Phase IV. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1987 (May, 1987), amended Phase IV of SDD No. 6. The amendment allowed Phase IV to be broken into two distinct and separate phases, which were called Phase IV and Phase V. This ordinance also set the maximum GRFA for the SDD at 120,600 square feet. Further, the ordinance required a minimum of 148 AUs and 67,367 square feet of GRFA devoted to AUs in Phases IV and V. Town of Vail Page 3 Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1989 (November, 1989) amended the density section of SDD No. 6. This ordinance modified the SOD by increasing the allowable GRFA to a total of 124,527 square feet. This allowed Unit No. 30 (originally Good's retail) in the Vail Village Plaza Condominiums to be converted from commercial to residential use. The space consists of 3,927 square feet of GRFA, and the conversion to residential use has been completed. This ordinance also maintained the approval for a minimum of 148 AUs and 67,367 square feet of GRFA, devoted to AUs, in Phases IV and V of SDD No.6. Ordinance No. 1 and No. 4, Series of 2000, a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 was approved to allow for construction of the Vail Plaza Hotel. Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2001 adopted a revised Approved Development Plan for Phase 11, which brought the total allowable GRFA for the entire SDD No. 6 to 182,325 square feet. Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2001 adopted a revised Approved Development Plan for Phase IV (i.e. Vail Plaza Hotel), and did not specify, in the form of a revised Approved Development Plan, the total allowable GRFA for the entirety of SDD No. 6. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2003, adopted a major amendment to SDD No. 6, allowing for the construction of a new dwelling unit above the Alpenrose Restaurant location, which increase the amount of allowable GRFA for the entire SDD to 184,708 sq. ft. and increase the density to 13 DUs per acre. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2005; adopted a major amendment to SDD No. 6, revising the amount of allowable GRFA for the entire SDD to 186,561 sq. ft. and increasing the density to 13.25 DU's per acre. IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS A. Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code CHAPTER 12-1, TITLE, PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY (in part) Section 12-1-2. Purpose: A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town, and to promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. Town of Vail Page 4 B. Specific. These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific purposes.- 1. urposes: 1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. 2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other dangerous conditions. 3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets. 4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off-street parking and loading facilities. 5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic values. 6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with Municipal development objectives. 7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures. 8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the Town. 9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable natural features. 10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters. 11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. ARTICLE 12-9A, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (in part) 12-9A-1: Purpose and Applicability.- A. pplicability. A. Purpose: The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development with the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas, and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail comprehensive plan. An approved development plan for a special development district, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the special development district. Town of Vail Page 5 B. Applicability: Special development districts do not apply to and are not available in the following zone districts: hillside residential, single-family residential, two-family residential and two-family prrmarylsecondary residential. 12-9A-10- AMENDMENT PROCEDURES.- B. ROCEDURES: B. Major Amendments: Requests for major amendments to an approved special development district shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures described in section 12- 9A-4 of this article. 2. Owners of all property requesting the amendment, or their agents or authorized representatives, shall sign the application. Notification of the proposed amendment shall be made to owners of all property adjacent to the property requesting the proposed amendment, owners of all property adjacent to the special development district, and owners of all property within the special development district that may be affected by the proposed amendment (as determined by the department of community development). Notification procedures shall be as outlined in subsection 12-3-6C of this title. V. SURROUNDING LAND USES Land Uses Zoning North: C❑QT right-of-way Not Zoned South: Mixed Use Public Accommodation East: Mixed Use SDD #39 (Solaris) West: Multiple Family SDD #21 (Gateway) VI. ZONING ANALYSIS/SDD #6, PHASE III Development Standard Approved/ Existing Proposed Change Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) Unit 501 2,467 sq. ft. 2,744 sq. ft. +277 sq. ft. Unit 502 1,399 sq. ft. 1,914 sq. ft. +515 sq. ft. Total SDD #6 186,561 sq. ft. 187,353 sq. ft. +792 sq. ft. (0.4%T) Parking 108 spaces 108 spaces 1.4 spaces per unit 1.4 spaces per unit No change Dwelling Units (DUs) 11 Dwelling Units 11 Dwelling Units No change Height 5 stories (74.3' per 5 stories (74.3' per No change (new roof SDD) SDD) elements @ 67.6' Town of Vail Page 6 Site Coverage 55%(per SDD 38% 1 No change Landscaping 30% (per SDD) 57% 1 No change VII. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Before acting on a major amendment to a special development district amendment application, the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposal: 1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. In contrast to other phases of SDD #6, Phase III has seen relatively few amendments. The structure has seen minor changes since its original construction, mainly exterior window updates and interior remodels, but remains largely unchanged from its original build. The proposed modifications will add interest and detail to the building and assists in its relationship to the more recently constructed adjacent properties. Staff believes that the proposed additions are compatible with the neighborhood related to architectural design and style. The additions will have a minor effect on the building's perceived mass and scale. The application has followed the guidelines recommended in the Vail Village Urban Design Standards by locating the infill out of sun/shade or views as illustrated by the drawings below: SUnfShadefViews Town of Vail Page 7 .._ _.... r. tom- L, y- Pedestrian Level Town of Vail Page 7 SuniShader .'ir."'Sun,'Shadc-Me��s i Pedestrians Le. Hca, 9—QLA,;--11_ . - F o of Roof Fr rn a Pedestrian Le eel The proposal complies with the overall height limit of the district as the proposed dormers do not increase the building's height. The new roof forms follow the flow of the existing roof forms to allow the viewer's eye to carry, resulting in a complete building whose additions are not over dominant or recognizable. The building additions are of appropriate scale for the structure and are compatible with the character of the neighborhood. Staff finds the proposal does comply with this criterion. 2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The proposal does not propose to change any of the uses, activity, or densities which are currently constructed within the project. The proposal to increase the allowable GRFA within the SDD requires mitigation of the impacts to employee generation pursuant to Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The applicant has stated in their written materials that the pay -in -lieu option would be selected if the proposal were approved. An increase in the allowable GRFA by 792 square feet results in a pay -in -lieu fee of $19,664.90 (79.2 s.f. x $134.65) under the existing adopted fee schedule. The pay -in -lieu fee is currently under its annual review with potential changes occurring in April. The required payment is calculated at the time of building permit submittal and may be different that the number above. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter 10 of this title. Town of Vail Page 8 The proposal to add approximately 792 square feet of GRFA to Units 501 and 502 do not change the required parking or loading and delivery requirements for the development. As a component of the approval for the Sebastian, its developer was required to provide a centralized loading and delivery facility for the use of all owners and tenants within SDD #5 and also to be made available for public and/or private loading and delivery programs. The continued use of this facility is vital in mitigating the loading and delivery impacts upon Vail Village. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans. Staff has reviewed the Vail comprehensive plan and found the following documents and associated goals, objectives, statements applicable to this proposal. Vail Land Use Plan (in part) 1. General Growth l Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 4. Village Core 1 Lionshead 4.1. Future commercial development should continue to occur primarily in existing commercial areas. Future commercial development in the Core areas needs to be carefully controlled to facilitate access and delivery. 4.2. Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing character of each area is preserved through implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan. 4.3. The ambiance of the Village is important to the identity of Vail and should be preserved. (Scale, alpine character, small town feeling, mountains, natural settings, intimate size, cosmopolitan feeling, environmental quality-) Town of Vail Page 9 5. Residential 5.1. Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. Vail Village Master Plan (in part V. GOALS, OBJECTIVES. POLICIES AND ACTION STEPS GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE iN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITYAND IDENTITY. Objective 1.1: implement a consistent development review process to reinforce the character of the Village. Policy 1.9.1: Development and improvement projects approved in the Village shall be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and design considerations as outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide Plan. Objective 1.2. Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide Plan. VII. VAIL VILLAGE SUB -AREAS A major goal of this Plan is to address the Village as a whole and at the same time be sensitive to the opportunities and constraints that may exist on a site specific basis. To facilitate long range planning unique to each area of the Village, ten different sub -areas are delineated in this Plan. Sub -areas were determined based on a number of different considerations. Foremost among these were.- design ere. design and site characteristics geographic or physical boundaries land uses and ownership patterns Each of the ten sub -areas have been evaluated relative to the overall goals, objectives, and policies outlined for Vail Village. The potential improvement projects, referred to as sub -area concepts, which have emerged from this evaluation are graphically represented on the Action Plan. These sub -area Town of Vail Page 10 concepts are physical improvements intended to reinforce the desired physical form of the Village as outlined in the various elements of the Master Plan. The 10 sub -areas (which follow), provide detailed descriptions of each sub -area concept and express the relationship between the specific sub -area concepts and the overall Plan. The applicable goals and objectives are cited for each of the sub area concepts at the end of each description under "special emphasis." The sub -area concepts described in this Section are meant to serve as advisory guidelines for future land use decisions by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council. Compliance with the sub -area concepts does not assure development approval by the Town. It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for those proposals that can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan. The Urban Design Guide Plan includes additional design detail that is to be used in conjunction with the Vail Village Master Plan sub -area concepts. MINCED USE SUB -AREA (#1) \M i �rrs+urrc uoa. - .n�ccw.�n r f O.c The Mixed -Use sub -area is a prominent activity center for Vail Village. It is distinguished from the Village core by the larger scale buildings and by the limited auto traffic along East Meadow Drive. Comprised of five major development Town of Vail Page 11 projects, this sub -area is characterized by a mixture of residential/lodging and commercial activity. The Vail Comprehensive Plan elements that speak to this site include the Vail Land Use Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan. Staff believes the proposed changes do not have an overall negative impact on the intent of stepping buildings up from the pedestrian oriented East Meadow Drive to the South Frontage Road East. The proposed building additions are consistent with the infill recommendations of the Vail Village Urban Design Guidelines. The additions are located such that their impacts on adjacent properties and on the pedestrian experience are minimal to nonexistent. The changes to the roof form allow the greater utilization of the upper residential units without the roof reading as cluttered or haphazard. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 5. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, is not located within any identified geologic hazard. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 6. design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The proposal does not include any changes to the site plan, building footprint design or location, or open space provisions. The proposal does include modifications to the roof plan that will allow the greater utilization of the top floor residential units. The new roof elements are designed to be compatible both with the existing structure and the overall design of the district. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation. The proposal does not include any changes to the pedestrian or vehicular circulation on or off site. Town of Vail Page 12 Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. The proposal does not include any changes to the landscaping or open space on the site as identified on the approved development plan. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. The proposal is intended to be constructed in one phase. Staging for any construction related activity will be reviewed by the Town of Vail staff to ensure impacts are minimized to public rights-of-way and adjacent properties. It is anticipated that the use of the South Frontage Road East right-of-way will be necessary. This right-of-way is controlled by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and will require all appropriate review and permits from CDQT should the project move forward. Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion. 10. Public Benefit: The proposed deviations provide benefits to the town must outweigh the adverse effects of such deviations. As a component of this project, the applicant is proposing to use DaVinci shake shingles on all new roof elements and to replace the existing roofs of levels four and five, currently clad in wood shake, with the polymer based composite roof. This change in roofing material over a significant portion of the building will reduce fire risks for the residents in this building and in the general vicinity. Also included as component of this project is the replacement of the existing outdated street light fixtures along the Frontage Road with TOV approved street lights. As the current plans do not illustrate this element, staff has included an appropriate condition of approval. It should be noted that Village Inn Plaza Phase III completed a rehabilitation of many of its exterior, pedestrian level elements in 2009. Phase I and 11 are anticipated to act on a recent DRB approval to complete these improvements in the district that include new pavers, site walls, ADA access and landscaping. Although not tied to this proposal, these improvements demonstrate Vail Village Inn's commitment to maintaining and improving public spaces. Town of Vail Page 13 Staff believes that the benefits to the Town including the replacement of outdated street lighting and a reduction in the fire risk to the area outweighs any adverse impacts associated with the proposal. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the Town Council on a major amendment to a Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 5012 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3)/Lot 0, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria described in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval, with conditions, for this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval to the Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot Q, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval, with conditions, for this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: `Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VIl this Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 14, 2014, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: I. That the special development district amendment complies with the standards listed Article 12-9A, Special Development District, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. Town of Vail Page 14 2. That the special development district amendment is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town; and 3. That the special development district amendment is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas; and 4. That the special development district amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. " Should the Pianning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval, with conditions, for this request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission applies the following conditions: 1. This SDD major amendment approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval of the associated design review application, including compliance with Sec. 14-10-5 BUILDING MA TERIALS AND DESIGN, Vail Town Code 2. The applicant shall mitigate the employee generation impact created by the addition of 792 square feet of GRFA in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12-24, inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. 3. The applicant shall receive and submit in conjunction with the building permit, all applicable Colorado Department of Transportation approvals for all impacts to the South Frontage Road East, including construction staging, if necessary. 4. The applicant shall amend the recorded condominium map to reflect the increase in floor area and space designation, prior to requesting a planning certificate of occupancy inspection. 5. The applicant shall replace the three (3) existing street lights located along the Frontage Road with TO street lights per Public Work's specification. The number of new fixtures shall be determined by the Director of Public Works and will not exceed three. The new street lights shall be installed prior to requesting a planning certificate of occupancy inspection. Town of Vail Page 15 IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Written Request dated April 4, 2014 B. Proposed Pians dated April 4, 2014 Town of Vail Page 16 Village Inn Plaza Vail Village Inn, SDD #6, Phase III Major Amendment to Special District No. 6 Expansion of Units 501 & 502 with Exterior Modifications December 30, 2013 Amended March 12, 2014 Amended April 4, 2014 [=&WQ - =-O- AffAW, frlolev-4 IMN tJmex ("d) M-ZZ60 IrA-y OW M-001 EGGERS ARCHITECTURE, INC. PO BOX 798 KRBi1NMING, CO 80459 (970)724.3411 FAX: (970) 724-3412 don,eggers@eggmarchitect=.com I. Introduction The owners of units 501 and 502, Lublan S.A., represented by Loguer Design and Eggers Architecture, Inc., are requesting a major amendment to Special Development District No.6 (SDD#6) to allow for the remodel and expansion of their units. Unit 501 (parcel #: 2101- 082-54-027) is proposing to increase the GRFA by 277 square feet and includes exterior changes to the building including the addition of secondary roof forms. Unit 502 (parcel #- 2101-082-54-028) is proposing to increase the GRFA by 515 square feet and includes the addition of secondary roof forms. The modification of Unit 502 also includes the relocation of an existing mechanical mezzanine to a newly constructed area with a net square footage loss of 49 square feet. According to Section 12-9A-2: Definitions, Vail Town Code, an increase of GRFA is considered a Major SDD Amendment. Unit 501 is proposing to undergo a complete interior remodel. The current plan includes 4 bedrooms, 4 baths and major living spaces on the main level of 2145 square feet. This plan has a loft area overlooking the main living space that includes 322 square feet. The remodel proposes to redesign the main level into three bedrooms and baths with an entry area expanded in to the common hallway between units 501 and 502. The new square footage of the main level will be 2248 square feet, an increase of 103 square feet. Additionally, the loft area will be remodel to include a bedroom suite and loft area overlooking the common area. This new space will include 496 square feet of space, an increase of 174 square feet. Total new GRFA will be 2744 square feet or an increase of 277 square feet on both levels. In order to meet egress requirements for the bedroom on the loft level, a new roof element is being added. The roof will present as a dormer on the north elevation and as a gable end element on the south elevation. The ridge line of the proposed gable matches the existing ridgeline of the building and does not represent a change is the building height. The size and configuration of the gable element is consistent with the existing gable elements on the south elevation. Unit 502 is proposing to remodel the existing kitchen/living area and update the bathrooms in the unit. Additionally, a loft is proposed in the attic area immediately above the unit. There currently exists a suspended mechanical mezzanine between the ceiling of the Unit 502 and the structural roof members. This loft area is 150 square feet is size. By relocating and constructing a new mechanical area in the attic space immediately adjacent and above the common area, the attic space can be utilized as living space by Unit 502. This area is proposed as an exercise room with an attached bath and steam room. A shed dormer is proposed for this area to allow for natural lighting. The roof element is above the main ridgeline of the building but lower than the two elevator tower units on each side of the dormer. This proposed loft represents an increase in the GRFA of 515 square feet to the unit. Floor plans of the proposed changes are provided below- CH 1 — �tI }y P r r w EXI@T4hCs FIF'` F Gog =`F - F2, s,P F FT - A1.1 !�SC®CSC LST F�CC¢ ...�I— A1.2 II. Background Village Inn Plaza is located at 100 East Meadow Drive. The property is part of Phase III of Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn. This SDD has an underlying zoning of Public Accommodation (PA). See vicinity map of property below: A � a wy � ry _• ,,r; x SDD #6 was adopted by Ordinance No. 7 of 1976 and has undergone multiple amendments since is adoption. Most of the amendments have been associated with the other phases of the SDD. The structure has seen minor changes since its original construction, mainly exterior window updates and interior remodels, but remains largely unchanged from its original construction. The proposed modifications will be add some exterior detail and update the appearance of the building to match the architectural detailing of the more recently constructed adjacent properties. See photo of the frontage road view taken from the north side of the highway: Vail Village Inn deviates from the maximum height limitation set forth in the Public Accommodation zone district of 48 feet for sloped roofs. Building heights were defined by number of stories in the original adoption of SDD#6 and further illustrated in a drawing created by consultants Royston, Hanamoto, Beck and Abey dated February 12, 1976. The building was constructed according to these height restrictions and has not been modified since. The new major gable element matches the existing ridgeline and the new dormer is lower in height than the existing elevator shaft roof elements, therefore not affecting the overall building height. See drawing below- 777' elow- There are no additional parking requirements as the number of units is not changing. III. Zoning Analysis The proposed modification only affects the GRFA and Employee Housing standards of the zoning analysis. All other standards are unchanged and remain as approved by Special Development District #6. Standard Existing Fes= T ... ... .... l• Unit 501 2467sf 2744 sf (277 additional) , 1399 sf 1914 sf 515 additional Parking 1.4 spaces per unit r 1 Approved prior to 79 sf (pay -in -lieu} Inclusionary Re uirement There are no additional parking requirements as the number of units is not changing. III. Zoning Analysis The proposed modification only affects the GRFA and Employee Housing standards of the zoning analysis. All other standards are unchanged and remain as approved by Special Development District #6. Standard Existing Proposed GRFA Unit 501 2467sf 2744 sf (277 additional) , 1399 sf 1914 sf 515 additional Parking 1.4 spaces per unit No change Employee Housing Approved prior to 79 sf (pay -in -lieu} Inclusionary Re uirement - ` 1�j ,.:..j.. :�..,� 4 ..,_........ L—I There are no additional parking requirements as the number of units is not changing. III. Zoning Analysis The proposed modification only affects the GRFA and Employee Housing standards of the zoning analysis. All other standards are unchanged and remain as approved by Special Development District #6. Standard Existing Proposed GRFA Unit 501 2467sf 2744 sf (277 additional) Unit 502 1399 sf 1914 sf 515 additional Parking 1.4 spaces per unit No change Employee Housing Approved prior to 79 sf (pay -in -lieu} Inclusionary Re uirement IV. Criteria for Review for the Major Amendment to a Special Development District Section 12-9A-8: Design Criteria and Necessary Findings in the Vail Town Code provides the criteria for review of a Major Amendment to a Special Development District. Below is a listing of the criteria and how the proposal complies with each: 9. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. Proposed: The architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation remains largely unchanged as a result of the proposed amendment. The roof changes align with the existing ridge, there fore the height remains the same as constructed. The massing and detailing of the gable elements is consistent with the adjacent gable ends on the building and the added elements add a level of architectural character evident on the newer adjacent properties. Since originally constructed, the character and level of architectural detailing of the village has increased dramatically. Adjacent buildings have been approved with greater heights and the proposed modifications are compatible with the immediate environment. 2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Proposed: There is no change to the use, activity or number of dwelling units within the proposed amendment. The increase is GRFA is consistent with the intent of Chapter 15 of the Vail Town Code and without the size of the roof elements would qualify as a minor amendment to the SDD. 3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in chapter I of this title. Proposed: The addition of GRFA does not affect the parking requirements for the units and is unchanged. 4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan, town ,policies and urban design plans. Proposed: Village Inn Plaza is within the boundaries of the Vail Village Master Plan and further located within Mixed Use Sub -Area #1. The following objectives of the master plan are applicable to this application: Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities Objective 2.5: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. 5. Natural And/Or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements 6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements as there are no changes proposed for the site plan. 7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements. 8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements. 9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements. V. Photo images: Below are images taken from Meadow Drive and the Frontage Road. The proposed improvements are not visible from other locations within the Village. From Meadow Dr. From walk below Vail Village Plaza VI From walk below Sebastian ram sidewalk along Frontage Road VI. Adjacent Property Owners Vail Gateway Plaza Condo Association c/o Vail Tax & Accounting PO Box 5940 Avon, CO 81620 Vail Plaza Hotel (Sebastian) c/o Timbers Resorts 16 Vail Road Vail, CO 81657 Village Inn Plaza Phase I,II,V c/o Jonathon Staufer, Manager 100 E. Meadow Drive, #31 Vail, CO 81657 Solaris c/o Peter Noble, John Board 2211 N. Frontage Road, Suite A Vail, CO 81657 One Willow Bridge Road Condo Association c/o Corporation Service Company 1560 Broadway, Suite 2090 Denver, CO 80202 One Willow Bridge Road Condo Association 4148 N Arcadia Drive Phoenix, AZ 85018 Talisman Condo Association c/o Ptarmigan Manangement 62 E. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Sonnenalp c/o Johannes Faessler 20 Vail Road Vail, CO 81657 TOWN OF VAIL PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION April 14, 2014 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 Swearing-in New Members — Patty McKenny, Town Clerk MEMBERS PRESENT Henry Pratt Luke Cartin Michael Kurz John Rediker Pam Hopkins Webb Martin Dick Cleveland Chair: Henry Pratt Motion: Kurz Second: Cleveland Vice -chair: Michael Kurz Motion: Rediker Second: Cleveland MEMBERS ABSENT Vote: 7-0-0 Vote: 7-0-0 30 minutes A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to a Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130046) Applicant: Deltec Bank and Trust, represented by Eggers Architect Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Recommendation of approval, with conditions MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 7-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. This SDD major amendment approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval of the associated design review application, including compliance with Sec. 14-10-5 BUILDING MATERIALS AND DESIGN, Vail Town Code 2. The applicant shall mitigate the employee generation impact created by the addition of 792 square feet of GRFA in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. 3. The applicant shall receive and submit in conjunction with the building permit, all applicable Colorado Department of Transportation approvals for all impacts to the South Frontage Road East, including construction staging, if necessary. 4. The applicant shall amend the recorded condominium map to reflect the increase in floor area and space designation, prior to requesting a planning certificate of occupancy inspection. 5. The applicant shall replace the three (3) existing street lights located along the Frontage Page 1 Road with TOV street lights per Public Work's specification. The number of new fixtures shall be determined by the Director of Public Works and will not exceed three. The new street lights shall be installed prior to requesting a planning certificate of occupancy inspection. Jonathan Spence gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. Don Eggers, representing the applicant, made himself available for any questions. Commissioner Rediker inquired as to other improvements that may be coming in the future and why those components were not coming forward in conjunction with this application. Don Eggers explained that it was largely owner driven as the owners are in different countries. The owner of the top two condominiums would like to get started this year, which is why this application is moving forward. Warren Campbell, Chief of Planning, explained that there was also a difference in process for the various forth coming applications in that the deck expansions and the building re -skin will not require Commission review as currently understood. Commissioner Rediker inquired about the condition regarding the replace of the pedestrian street lights with lights which match the Town of Vail uniform street lights. Commissioner Cleveland asked how the public benefit of replacing the pedestrian street lights would be attributed to Phase III of the Vail Village Inn. There was no public comment. The Commissioners general expressed their support for the application and the improvements made to the plans since the last hearing. 2. A request for the review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for a public and quasi -public indoor community facilities (education center), to allow for the construction of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Education Center, located 530 South Frontage Road/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140005) Applicant: Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, represented by Jack Hunn Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to May 12, 2014 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 7-0-0 3. A request for a variance from Section 14-3-1, Table 1, Minimum Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 14-1-5, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential driveway to exceed the permitted maximum centerline grade, located at 2754 Snowberry Drive / Lot 15, Block, 9, Vail Intermountain and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140007) Applicant: Mike Dantas, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Joe Batcheller ACTION: Table to April 28, 2014 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 7-0-0 4. A request for the review of variances from Section 12-7D-9 Landscaping and Site Development Section 12- 7D-10 Parking and Loading, Section 14-5-1, Minimum Standards and Section 14-5-2 Other Requirements, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, for relief from the minimum landscape requirement, the parking space dimensional requirement, the snow storage requirement and to Page 2 TOW?J OF VAi ` VAI LTOWN PLANNINGAND ENVI RONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 9, 2016 ITEM/TOPIC: April 25, 2016 PEC Meeting Results ATTACHMENTS: File Name PEC—Results-042516. pdf Description April 25, 2016 PEC Meeting Results PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION TOWN Of VA L April 25, 2016, 1:00 PM Vail Town Council Chambers 75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657 Call to Order Members Present: Ludwig Kurz, John Ryan Lockman, Henry Pratt, and Brian Stockmar Absent: Brian Gillette, Kirk Hansen, and John Rediker 2. A request for review of an Exemption Plat pursuant to Section 13-12-3, Vail Town Code, Plat Procedure and Criteria for Review, to adjust the location of the building envelope located at 971 Spraddle Creek Road, Lot 8, Spraddle Creek Estates, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC16-0013) Action: Table to May 23, 2016 Motion: Kurz Second: Stockmar Vote: 4-0-3 3. Approval of Minutes April 11, 2016 PEC Meeting Action: Approve Motion: Kurz Second: Stockmar Vote: 4-0-3 4. Informational Update PEC Training — Special Development Districts Chris Neubecker, Planning Manager, made a presentation regarding Special Development Districts (SDDs). SDDs allow for flexibility but must comply with specific criteria listed in the Town Code. Uses are limited to the underlying zoning district of the specific area. Additional land uses can not be added, but uses may be further restricted. The process starts with a pre -application meeting between the applicant and planning staff to identify the concept and identify any elements of the SDD that do not comply with Town Code. The applicant then appears before the PEC; it may take several meetings to fully review. The PEC will review where the proposal differs from Town Code and the public benefit associated with granting approval of the project. The plan presented and a separate ordinance are what will regulate the SDD in the future. The DRB may also be involved in the review of a conceptual development plan, but DRB does not have to review the plan. . Review criteria for SDDs include: 1. Compatibility 2. Relationship of land uses 3. Parking and loading 4. Comprehensive Plan 5. Natural and/or geologic hazard 6. Design features 7. Traffic 8. Landscaping 9. Workable plan Lockman — Are the criteria weighted where one item may be more important than another? Neubecker — There may be times when one criteria is not applicable, but there is not one criteria that is more important than any other. A project should comply with all criteria. Town Council is the final decision maker for SDDs, but it does consider the recommendations of the PEC. SDDs require a public hearing and two readings of an ordinance. Rezoning is possible concurrent with an SDD, but would be done by separate application (Amendment to District Boundaries application) which can be reviewed concurrently with the SDD application. A development plan and an ordinance are the controlling documents for a SDD. A development plan may be specific. Some benefits of specific plans are that development is predictable, but on the other hand, changes to the plans require additional reviews and changes to be made to the SDD, through the amendment process. When deviating from the underlying zoning district, the public benefit of granting such deviations is evaluated. This is not an opportunity to extract a pound of flesh in exchange for approving the request. The burden of proof of public benefit is on the applicant. Examples of public benefits are additional employee housing, transit improvements, open space, and increased environmental protection. Another example would be to approve a taller building in exchange for a greater setback from Gore Creek. SDDs can be amended via either a major or minor amendment. Minor amendments can be approved by staff. Major amendments are required to be reviewed by the PEC and to be granted approval by the Town Council. Specific findings are required, focused on the nine (9) criteria, are required for approval or denial of an SDD application. SDDs may expire if they are not started within three (3) years and continued diligently toward completion. With phased SDDs, the next phase must start within one (1) year of completion of the previous phase. SDDs are similar to what other communities refer to as Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) or Master Plans. Land use controls, permitted uses, design regulations are common elements within SDDs and PUDs. Neubecker concluded by stating that there are forty (40) SDDs within Vail. Stockmar — Economic conditions can alter phasing of the project. How do we handle such situations? Neubecker — A change in phasing may require an amendment to the SDD phasing plan. Stockmar — What if a developer completes Phase I but wants to walk away from the project before Phase 11? Neubecker —We cannot require them to complete Phase II, but he will research any instances of this occurring. Lockman — Can a separate developer then complete Phase II? Neubecker — Yes. Spence — Town requires a demonstration that each separate phase of the plan can stand on its own. Pratt— It is his experience that a revegetation bond may be required. Lockman — Is there criteria for when a variance is requested, or an SDD would be required? Neubecker — A variance is based on physical hardship while an SDD request is more based on a desire for flexibility for an alternative design. Pratt — SDDs should be considered a positive approach to land use planning. But the application process and materials can be very expensive. Neubecker — Vail does not, but some other communities, have a minimum size for such a development. Lockman — Can the town apply for an SDD? Neubecker — The town can apply for an SDD on property it owns, but not for a private property owner. Pratt suggested an additional educational session on the General Use zoning district. Most of the development standards in General Use are set by the PEC. Neubecker — Are there other topics of interest to the PEC members? Lockman — Specific zoning districts and how they differ. Also, how the Comprehensive Plan relates to the zoning districts. Pratt — Training on the legal criteria for what is a special privilege and spot zoning when discussion variance cases. Neubecker— Future topics currently planned include nonconforming uses and structures, GRFA, transportation plan, and other discussions with the environmental team. Lockman — Is there a way to link a specific parcel under review to the Town's mapping software? Neubecker demonstrated some information available for parcels in the mapping software. Spence — Newer mapping software will be available soon. Neubecker demonstrated how to access the Town's view corridors on the Town's online GIS mapping software. 5. Adjournment Action: Approval Motion: Lockman Second: Kurz Vote: 4-0-3 TOW?J OF VAi ` VAI LTOWN PLANNINGAND ENVI RONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: 5/9/2016 ITEM/TOPIC: Informational presentation by Eagle County on Plan4Health grant program and process. Presenters: Katie Haas and Kris Valdez of Eagle County Government Ad Name: 12065835A THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33 Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will Vail Daily hold a public hearing in accordance with section pm int, Vail Town Code, is May 9, Building. at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town PROOF OF PUBLICATION Council on a revision to a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an in- STATE OF COLORADO } crease in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn l SS Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and I setting forth details in regard thereto. COUNTY OF EAGLE } (PEC16-0014) Applicant: Lublan S.A., represented by Eggers Ar- chitect Planner: Jonathan Spence I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified A request for review of a conditional use permit, representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a religious institution, lo- printed, in whole or in part and published in the County cated at 12 Vail Road/Lots N & O, Block 5D , Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard of Ea le, State of Colorado, and has a eneral circulation g g thereto. (PEC16-0015) Applicant: C Jewish Center, represented by Mauriello Planning Group therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously Planner: Matt Panfil and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of The applications and information about the propos- als are available for public inspection during office more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first hours at the Town of Vail Community Develop - ment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and public is invited to attend site visits. Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information. that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice Sign language interpretation is available upon re - 24-hour Please and advertisement as re uested. q quest, with notification. call 970-479-2356,Telephone for the Hearing Im- paired, forrinformation. Published April 22, 2016 in the Vail Daily The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium, (12065835) only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of I consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 4/22/2016 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 4/22/2016 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 04/25/2016. General Man ager/Publisher/Editor Vail Daily Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 04/25/2016. � 2M.&& 9. -V-� Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public My Commission expires: November 1, 2019 Ad Name: 12098832A Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM Your account number is- 1 OP2P 33 Vail Daily PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO } }SS. COUNTY OF EAGLE } I, Don Rogers, do solemnly swear that I am a qualified representative ofthe Vail Daily. That the same Daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice and advertisement as requested. The Vail Daily is an accepted legal advertising medium, only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 5/6/2016 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 5/6/2016 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 05/09/2016. General Man ager/Publisher/Editor Vail Daily Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 05/09/2016. � 2M 4, & 9. -V-� Pamela J. Schultz, Notary Public My Commission expires: November 1, 2019 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION May 9, 2016, 1:00 PM Vail Town Council Chambers 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 1.Call to Order 2.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a revision to a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an in- crease in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3)/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC16-0014) - 45 min. Applicant: Lublan S.A., represented by Eggers Ar- chitect Planner: Jonathan Spence 3.A request for final review of a Development Plan, pursuant to Section 12-61-11, Vail Town Code, to allow for the future development of Employee Housing Units on the Chamonix parcel located at 2310 Chamonix Road, Parcel B, Resubdivision of Tract D'Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC150019) - 5 min. Table to June 13, 2016 Applicant:Town of Vail Community Development Department Planner: George Ruther 4.A request for review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a religious institution, lo- cated at 12 Vail Road/Lots N & O, Block 5D , Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC16-0015) Withdrawn Applicant:Chabad Jewish Center, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Matt Panfil 5.Approval of Minutes April 25, 2016 PEC Meeting Results 6. Informational Update Informational presentation by Eagle County on PIan4Health grant program and process. Present- ers: Katie Haas and Kris Valdez of Eagle County Government - 15 min. 7.Adjournment The applications and information about the propos- als are available for public inspection during regu- laroffice hours at the Town of Vail Community De- velopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orienta- tion and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Develop- ment Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be re- lied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional in- formation. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 48-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD), for information. Community Development Department Published in the Vail Daily May 6, 2016 (12098832)