Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1983-46 Rezoning a Parcel Commonly Referred to as the Getty Oil Site, A 1.02 Acre Unplatted Piece of Land in Bighorn from Low Density Multiple Family to Arterial Business
i " ~ ~ ~~~u~ a~J ~b~~~ ~~-moo ~~.3 ORDINANCE NO. 46 Series of 1983 AN ORDINANCE REZONING A PARCEL COMMONLY REGERRED TO AS THE GETTY OIL SITE, A 1.02 ACRE UNPLATTED PIECE OF LAND IN BIGHORN, FROM LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY (LDMF) TO ARTERIAL BUSINESS (AB), AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.110 of the Vail Municipal Code, a rezoning has been requested by Brooks Investment to rezone the Getty Oil Site from Low Density Multi-Family (LDMF) to Arterial Business (AB)~,; and; WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is in the public interest to rezone said property NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE ~iOW~i COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL THAT: Section 1. The Council specifically finds that the procedures for the amendment of the Official Zoning Map and rezoning of properties within the Town of Vail as prescribed in Section 18.66.110 of the Vail Municipal Code have been fulfilled, and the Council hereby receives the report and recommendation of the Planning and Environ- mental Commission. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 18.66.160 of the Vail Municipal Code, the betty Oil Site is rezoned from Low Density Multi-Fa~~ily (LDMF) to Arterial Business (AB) with the use restricted to a restaurant of X220 square feet. Section 3. As provided in Section 18.08,030 of the Vail Municipa] Code, the Zoning Administra- tor is hereby directed to promptly modify and amend the Official Zoning Map to indicate the rezoning specified in Section 2 above. Sc~cti.on a• If a.ny Part, section, subsection, sentence, clause ar phrase of tha.s ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such dec~.sion shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council herelay declares it would have passed this az•cli.n~ince, and each part, section, subsccta.an, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, r•e~ardzess of the fact that any one ar mare parts, sections, suk~sectic~zas, sentences, clztuses or phrases by declared invalid. 7~ Section 5: The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof, --- _~~`~"' - =;rs- . ~~~• '~ y' - ,a; Section ~ 6. - The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal. ,- - Cade as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued,-; :~- ,r . any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, ,: - any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under' or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of ~. ~ 3- any provision hereby shall not revive any provision ar any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS day of , 1983, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the day of 1983, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in fu1T this day of 1983. , ATTEST: Rodney E. Slifer, Mayor Pamela A. Brandmeyer Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of Rodney E. Slifer, Mayor , 1983. Pamela A. Brandmeyer Town Clerk t n 1 ~ U ~ ~ ~' ~~ `C1 ^~ 'Q O ~~ ~ ~. 0. o ~( ~` Q ~\ h ~~ • ~ rn ~ zoocn~o tn~ rr £ ~3~~ rr~ ~o a~a ,!: J`a rt ~' ~ Q'i "i f~ `C r tli O r'• {1'. 'i SA ~ ' O ..r. ~' f'T tt7 C.`.. {'.% f7 ~D fJ ~ fJ t0 ~ fT ~ fY ~ h ~: l • W ;o C tv ro o r r• b D• ro r• r• n r• O `S r', r• ~ ~~ K ~ O N O Su 4 ~a R. t7' ~c ra 4 *-~ --• t7 vi cn l3 CT :~ N t1• oo ~ C r., to f~ ~ r-- ;a M ~ a• :n o cn ~ r-= ,•~ ~ as A~ n n m co rn ~~ r• rr ~ - m rr ~ cn O~n o rn r• ~ o n cn cn _ 4 F'• rt Ps ~` ~ per' ~ rt ~ C7 C~ ~ iv 'i ri- f0 G O O ~ ~ ~ ~ m o - ~ n ~ ~ ~ r= ~ ~., R (;Y O ..J f'T z (U !-h Qa pJ (~ ~~. CD F^' F-'` ~:~ - rr, to n ,~' o ~ to ~ s~ r• +--, r• o ,-~ CJ n o' ~- ~ r~ro-t o wrn ~ocr~ orn~ ~ ~' ro ~ £ {JG f-r ~ b ~ ['t b ~ tD cn rn cn ('J r• ~--•: W "-~ ~3 .~~-. ~ SIG © Y•(Jq fv fR V7 •• ~ ~ lJi `-~ ~ r~ r'J C9 w• ~ s T ~ ,..j O `T7 (Y7 Q1 G^ ~7C W a O cn rt ~,~ ~ q pa v, ~ r-r, sD r• Y- R ch--• ~ ~ n -- n~ ~ ~ , . su a. a. a. a7 ~ v~ ~ r• ^~ C:. C o ~ n a. -~ ~t cn •a aV ~ N ~~ ~m ~ v ~n ~ ~ ~ inO W ro 4 r• ~s l~ "' tt G ''C h-- C1; 70 W ~ Cn ~`` i.n w t7 Y• ~ ~ fT O r• {.J4 O rt ~ ~ b Cr rr ~ ~ ~ ~.o ~ 4 ra- rt rr ~ N ~ ro rr w C r• O ~ rh n : ca 2 ~ ~• r• r4 ~' ~ Ora D ^' r} Y ~s _ ~ ~ o ~• r* o ~ n cn o to ~ N ra s~ +~ ~ sT ~ ~ N r-i O W ~ G ~ O ~ V p~ r• :3 N to r-- r-t r '~ r{ rr rt rt r-a rt [n C-: O H R ~ `< t7 r-~ 00 r-'• (D Y• Oc pa ~ '-J N O O G w fD Jo ~ • C N• ~' ~ ~S ~ •- ~ W d ~ O ~-'- ~ C7 rr r• O N ~C cn r-~ R, ri Ay t~ rr `C ~ ~~SRp~ ~ 0 4 w ~o n ~ rv SY ~ 4• ~ W 4 ~ ~~ ~ 4 ~ ~• W l ~ r N ro n o n o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ of r~ rr rv G~ ~~ n m r-i `-G rt ~ `-G A~ ~ ^. ~ G- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ fD U? ~ !q r- O rt d t-- r- ~ po (s~ ~ Sa C. O" C} ~ `C ~ rJ (D pq ~ G O rr rr ~ C O r--~ r7 •i Cr '+p co n ~ ri m pa ~' rD ~ ~ N rt C;--• r• {/1 ~ rr ~ ~- to ~- rt ,O f4 ti .~ ~' C!C ~D l'J r• ~.. w ~ r- ri 4. ~1 q tv ri • C. "t O '~ - 4 r-• ~• r• Gh t-n ~} n G tx ~ rri CIS Q'~ v~ ~ ~ ~ [!] to ~ CJ O •':.' rt N ~ ~" ~^- r~ !TJ ~ f7 ~ N 'J d ~ "t3 N d C} ~r+wK ~ •-. •- rt G 4~~ m~ rn G~ ~ ~. ;~ ~ ~n O w rn rt ~n C Oa l~ rr ri r- ft ;n C-I ~" fiJ ~• N r ;i !J f4 W '-'i C'r rt C) r• ~ R. t ~' - tD rr n Cr tU `•C ~ t-r • rt •-t W w Us O ~ d ~ r1'-C ~"~ ro C~ 4 cn pi O ~ ~ r-' C- C~ ri O (D (I} O ~ fT ~t ~ O as -.- O ~ s]~ *-n r- r• ~ r? G r' n ~ m C ~ ~ O rt ro rt O r-r (~ CJ :3 rD ra• ~, r, r. ~ • ~• rr ^i lD rt R• Q. ~ C f4 ~' ,-, ~C n f0 V i-~ I~ C/] n d H 0 • -- 4 t37 rt ~ oo V} r-a Q V1 ~ rt £ r-3 ~ n r r•i Z O Q i~ ~ fs r. O W ~ F-"• ~ ' O ~ ¢1 ri S N F•'• O F't1 fD py ~ "• ;~^ av ti ~1 O a~ ~ tC .G ~ ~.n O K• Qs: 't cn O •t7 a ? . ••~• ~ O' rr w O.• r•~ r: ~~ r~ rT O- N w O' O ~ ro ~n M rrt ~' rr ue n 'Jc W n ~ OCR rt ~ ~ ~ fD ri 9 C" `1 ° ~ , ~ • ro C W ro O a - r-- / r--• . r r• 's~ ~' ro r• w n ~ r ' s , r • r• n ~ o rv o iv o w a. rr x~ ~ v ~. ! rn --•~ f9 to to O ~• z ro r• oo rn C rn ~ ro C r••a t~7 v a F r? o r• ro ~ R cn 7$ (4 E O t7 ~ r'i ~ C cn C, [n r•-+ -••{ r-• Ln OR W f] l5 Q~ f9 -"R 7d ~ '•C r• rt ~. ro rr ~; cn o~n O rn M• `G o rt ~ cn r-r j • a t-'• rt ~ ~ ~ ou ~~ rr ~ ©by ~ to ~ r• f~ ~ O O ~ H rr Eti O O rT Z m ~+, QQ P~ n Q (D I-•; F-+ Z ,\~ ~ ^a r•~• ~ r•+, sli fs ~O- O r"-~ ~ fD (d 'i O Q~ ~ ro r• ~--' r• O r-• Q R ~ a fD ~ O • ~ O ~• " f6 E .. ~ ~• ° ~ ~ ~ E ~ rr ~ •v c. h ~ CT O ~ rt ~ ~ ro N rn cn ro r-• !J• 0.7 !-' ~ ~ ~ ~ O N• 0Q W [!, V, '~ :~ t1~ `C ro r fD lD ~• ~ rt ~ i-i O 'T] LU (17 ~ 09 qo ~ O cn ~ cn C O Q4 rn rn >-n ro r• w• rt a ~ or.~ -a ~ rt ~ w rt ~ • - w a a. ~. rp ~ V ~ tip O r• ri 0. C ~J O rs C~. ~~ rt V]'t3 Oa "d ~U ~• ~ !~ ~ p f0 O cn r-• ri - y fT C3 '~C r. V; O O O' l.n Q W r4 O r'• 't JO As s'~ V] ~ Vt N n r• ~ ~ rt ~ ` d r• U~+ O rr a O O G rt ~~ ^1 0 C~ N r• ~. ~- ~" i= ~ u, 00 n G O ~ r• r--r h•'• ~ O 1 \ w ~~ o r• rT R co cu +--•• m rr w e r• o o rn n ~ o 'z o T r• ro o•' N Qa ~ a• v~ ~ ~ o ~ ro o p O n o Z ~ ~ m r rri i + -n `L3 n ~ ~ ~ w m ~ rn •- o r• r* o r~ ~i cn o °n r-~ t.s ro p, r~ ~ rT r•-~ n \ , ~ R. ~ rn E ~ rt a r• ~a~C co ~,~ ~• o~ ro rT ~ N~ ~ w ~- ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~• ~~ N ro ~ n ,-r '~ n rT rT rt ~-+ r7 cn n o ~ ~ O -mil ro r• r--~ ~' ~• ~ ' r-~ ,_, N F'• ~ Q7 i C' 'T] O ~ h ~ ~ r- rT ~ `C { r• r0 r• ~ Oq ~ ~.t (D Q O C m e~ fD ~o ... ro r• ~' ~ ~i ~ - ~' 4v O O o r• O -.., ~ . rt ~ O rt ro r-~ r-r O ps n 00 rr N o. ~ ~ ~ £ ro ~ a'n ~ ro ~~ rn µ~ rt0 0 a ~, a w ~ rh ~ ~ D r-n 0 ' rn r ~ • ~ o ~ r~ rT ~ f p i p. P. . ~ n ~ ~ in ~ n n O ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ n r o O ~ w ~ to to ~ ~ N W '0 to R ro rn W w `C r• rt O Ai `C A~ rt O ~' Oo O ~ ti ~ ~cn£ro ~- orTor~r-~QOro Ewa ~ 1 rr ~ ~ a C w• V) r+, ~• ~ r. ro n N to ~i O.. x S~ •~ ~G ~ ra ro ao .~ ~ m R n ~ C o r• ~ ra n rn ~ ro • n ~ v N ~ ~ rrt Ct-- F^'• C!2 ~ rt W t-• vs O SD ri ~ *-3 r~• r• rt w `C ~C N ~ r~ rj r-• ~ ~ 'i ~ r-~ O ~" ~D O r•~• N Ps `C N ~ U r-3 ~ ~ ;rc .a ro r• x ~ ~ r/ n a ~~ o N ~ o. ~ a O r• r- r• rn rt, ya O ~ oa ro rn cn ~ c.,ti M O ~a Cn ~ ~ o o • •-d n N n ~' c~ ~ ro~ o rn N• a o ~ '•t) ~ • ~ _ ~n ro W rn rt ~ d 0~ lD R ~ r• ~ oro ~G o rs w Q ~' rn su ro ~ n '~ R ~ ~ rY, R m ~ N ~ f~ (U ~ ~• t (D O rD n ~' C] vi f 1 O F-'• 0.1 •p ~ O ~ E "-' frt RI ~ O rn fJ ~ W ~ f"~ Gl. Y -• (D • r-t f7 6~ W `-C 1'h R "~"'~ "j W F-' Vl ~ O R rd r-"~G ~ C - G, ~ ~ ~ ~ O ( o O ~ rr ~ G O Q4 ~l O ~ iy r-n r' r-', rt a ~ ~ rt rS ~ E ro r • ~a rt ~ . O'• rt R fs ~' `C ~' 1 ~' p~ CrJ W O rr (~ rr ro ro ~ ~ ~ ~, a ~. . ~, r7 ~ . ... ro o ro x r"-~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ o ~ .'~ J ~ ~ ~ Planning and Environmental ComrrliSSio11 Noverr}ber 28, 1983 PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Diana Donavan Dick Ryan Jirn Morgan Tom Braun Gordon Pierce Larry Eskwith Duane Piper Betsy Rosolack Howard ~tapson Wi11 Trout Jim Vie1e The meeting was called to order by Duane Piper, chairman, at 2:00 pm. 1, Approval of minutes of November 14. The minutes were not available.} 2. A request for a rezoning on the Getty Oil site parcel immediately west of Pitkin Creek Park Condominiums in Bighorn) from Low Density Multi-Family ~LDMF} to Rrterial Business District in order to build a restaurant. Applicant: Brooks Investment Dick Ryan explained that this proposal had been changed and was now a request to build a restaur~.nt and lounge. He went over the memo and site p1 an. Marvin Hatami, architect for the project stated that the proposal had been reduced in reporid to objections in height and massing. He showed the new project on the site plan, floor plans, section and one elevation. He asserted that the Town of Vail had allowed the Pitkin Creek Park, a multi-use development with a grocery store, restaurant and liquor store. He stated that he was directed by staff to request Arterial Business zoning. Hatami felt that the Town of Vail could limit the use to a restaurant. Jay Peterson, developer of Pitkin Creek Park said that only 5-6% of the development was commercial which were integrated into the whole development. Peterson added that if the Getty property were zoned Arterial Business District, the owner had a right to have anything on the property allowed under than zoning, and it would be the burden of the Town to turn down a request for conditional use. Peterson read a letter from Jim Sheehan opposing the zoning. Pepi Langegger, a nearby landowner felt that the additional traffic that would be generated would be a big detriment. He added that he had a lot about the same size and asked what would deter others like himself from asking far an upzone. Georges Boyer, resident of Timber Falls felt that the road was already overcrowded, He added that the commercial in Pitkin Creek Park would provide for the needs of the residents of Bighorn. Piper mentioned that the petition circulated had names and phone numbers only, not addresses. Murray Neminger, who would be managing the restaurant, stated that he had circulated the petition mostly at the Pitkin Creek Park swimming pool. PBC -2 /28/83 .~ Mr. Braser of 3628 Bast Bridge Road spoke in opposition to the restaurant, -.. Russ Leonetti representing an owner named Jones opposed the proposal, mainly because at traffic. Trout stated that he would support more residential similar.. to the last proposal. Donovan felt that Arterial Business zone would allow too many things that would not work on that site. Viele concurred with the staff and Peterson. Pierce had mixed feelings, stating that he felt a need for this type of restaurant, but must consider the neighbors' objections. Morgan felt - that a1] the zoning had been self imposed by the property owners, but felt that it was somewhat unfair...the property being quasi -commercial at the outset. He fe]t that the town could use a restaurant in that location. Morgan added that the road would be improved at that location eventually, and he stated that he did not feel that this was an appropriate location fora park. Piper stated that the Town could restrict the use to a restaurant and pointed out that the neighbors were divided as to whether or not they supported the restaurant. He added that the property was bounded by an entrance ramp and a service road and wondered what the best use of the property would be. He pointed out that when people were told there would be a liquor stare and grocery stare in Pitkin Creek Park, they were supportive, and a restaurant was not un]ike those. He favored the project. Mike Palmer, a realtar, spoke that when he worked in that area it was a problem to find a restaurant for lunch. Matami felt that the Community Development Department should help to develop the property, and that he would be happy to work out the details regarding traffic, site plan, etc. lieminger said that it would not be another Ruby's, that there would be activities far kids as well. Ne pointed out that at all of the other off ramps in the valley there was commercial, but no residential. He would work with the neighbors so that the restaurant was not noisy. After more discussion, Jim Morgan moved and Duane Piper seconded to approve the request with the condition that there be an agreement prior to construction and written into the ordinance between the Town of Vaii and the owners, that the site be restricted to a restaurant only. The vote-was 2 in favor !;Morgan and Piper) with 5 against. -The motion for approval was defeated. .J PEC 11/28/83 -3_ 3. Request to amend_Special Development District 6 (Vail Village Inn} to rezone the Amoco_site_from Heavy Service to Public Accommodation and to include the site into the SDI}6, to aTnend the. zoning code to increase the. acreage, eliminate__distance between buildings, amend the height section, amend the plan, increase the gross residential floor area and change the mix of accorTrinodation units and condominium units, to request an exception to the parking and not have permanent parking for charter buses and to request a conditional use to permit meeting rooms and convention facilities. Applicant: Piccidilly Square, Inc. Dick Ryan explained that this was the second time this had come before the Planning and Environmental Commission, and added that it had been substantially modified. He listed the major issues which were also in the memorandum. Ryan pointed out that the staff recommended denial, even though there were many positive steps taken by the applicant. He said the major concern with the proposal was the additional GRFA requested. He felt criteria should be established for allowing additional GRFA and aCCOiTlITiOddtiOn units before granting additional GRFA. Gor°don Piece, architect for the project, stated that he had made many changes and some were made after the memo had been printed. He showed a model arTd drawings, one overlay of the drawings being drawn lately. He said that since the memo was written, the applicant had reduced the GRFA to 151,600 square feet. Fred Hiller, potential purchaser of the property, said that he had reduced the number of roor~TS from 189 to 185, increased the commercial space to 14,800 square feet in Phase IV and 6,850 square feet in Phase V, Ryan felt that there was a tension between Phase IiI and the adjoining building in Phase IV. Chuck Christ, representing the Board of Realtors, read a letter signed by the president, Sue Rychel stated that in a poll of the members, 75% of them were in favor or the proposal, 3°o were against, and 221 did not vote. Her letter added that the 3% against were concerned that the service station be replaced, Bill High of the Vail 1~iationaT Bank spoke in favor of the proposal and added that his bank would be participating in the financing. Bike Cronin, a real tor, supported the proposal, Ralph Harrison, manager of the Ho]iday Inn, opposed the proposal on the grounds that additional rooms would dilute the lodging business in town. Joe Stauffer, owner, said that he had talked with the manager of the Kiandra who did not see any problem with the project. Van Ewing,a•realtor who rented a space in Phase III, spoke in favor of the project. Jeff Winston of Winston Associates, consultant on the project felt there were three issues of concern. First, the architectural style was different from Phase III which difference was accented because of the closeness of Phase IV to III. Second, the stepping down of the southwest building was not apparent until one reached Vail Road. Third, there should be more of a transition in the plaza. Pierce showed slides demonstrating the view of the ski trails as one approaches the town along I-70. Viele asked I~yan what stage the establishment of criteria for allowing additional ' PCC 11/2$/83 _~ , GRFA had reached, and Ryan replied that the staff was working with Winston and ' Associates and others on it, but that the discussions were sti]1 in the preliminary stage. Ryan added that the staff had great concern that until the Town Council were to establish criteria, no additional GRFA should be granted. Viele concurred with the staff. He felt that the project was positive and did many good things for Uail, but was mare cancerned with the massing and height, - Donovan said that her opinion hadn`t changed, but that she had the same concerns :~ :_ she had at the last meeting regarding the elimination of the service station, that the restrictions of the original SDD were ignored, the buildings were too massive still, the views were important, that redevopment was needed, but this ~. was too much, ~:~~ Rapson responded to ~Jinston's suggestions; saying that he Tiked the feeling in the plaza, we]comed~that type of redevelopment including the size, and felt that it was dynamic and would not affect the quaint and picturesque village. Fie fait that it was sad to have to wait for new criteria for things that will develop. Trout stated that he would like to not wait and wanted to make a motion. Morgan felt that Pierce did an admirab]e job rewori:ing the design, but he still had diffi- culty with massing. He felt that the building adjacent to Phase IiI was sti11 a little large, and felt that there was a wall effect on Vaii Road, but felt that the project was beneficial to Vail. Trout moved to approve the proposal as presented that day Nov. 28, T9831 with the plan overlay and with the changes of a decrease of GRFA to 151,6Q0, an -increase of commercial space in Phase IV to 14,8x0 square feet, an increase of commercial space in Phase V fora total of b,850 square feet, and a total number of rooms of 185 tchanged from 189) because the bulk, mass, height, view corridor, parking, density, and eliminating the charter bus parkins were acceptable, the i:ota_l GRFH was merited because the proposal as presented represented the intentions and spirit of the original SDD. He moved that the rezoning be approved because it encouraged a harmonious, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal development ob,iectives, that the conditional use for the convention space be approved because the proposed location of the use and accord with the purposes of the district in which the site is located and the general all-over welfare and interest of the community as a_whole. The conditions for approval were: That Phase V should be started and complel;ed during the next three to five years, that the applicant agree to oar ticipate in_and not remonstrate against a special improvement district if formed for the 4-way stop area, and that the architectural design features as presented on the plans, elevations and model not be altered end that the environmental impact statement report be approved. Viele seconded the motion and_the vote was 4 in favor. 2 against (Donovan and Morgan? with Pierce abstaining. ,, ._.J PEC 1]/28/83 #~ 4. A request for a setback variance in order to build a multi-use space at Apollo~Lodge. Applicant: Apalla best, Inc. Dick Ryan explained that this was a revised request and that the requested area had been reduced, and that the setback variance requested ranged from 3 to 10 feet. John Perkins, architect for the project, showed site plans with existing and proposed construction, and elevations and sections. Trout moved and Rapson seconded to approved the request as presented. The vote was unanimously approved. 5. A request for a front setback variance in order to construct a residence on Lot 26, vail Village West Filing Rio. 2. applicant: Will Miller Tom araun explained the request explaining that the staff recommended denial explaining that the zone did not allow for the development of a primarS~/secondary unit on a lot under 15,000 square feet without certain conditions being rnet, and this apEalication did not meet those conditions. Tim Clark, architect for the project stated that in that subdivision, 75/ of the buildings were non-conforming, and that only 7% of the lots were yet to be developed. Will Mi11er, applicant, gave the board letters of approval and support, and pointed out that he could build the same amount of GRFA with a single family home. Clark showed floor plans, but did not have any elevations to show what was being proposed. Morgan wondered why one of the stipulations far granting a variance of this kind was that it must benefit the visual appearance of the site when there was a hard- ship and when the Town would benefit by having an employee rental unit. After more discussion, Morgan moved and Rapson seconded to approve the request for a front setback variance. The vote was unanimously in favor. The nreeting adjourned at 5:30 pm. t ~~ t~ f ~ MEMORANDUM T0: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department - DATE: November 2l, 1983 .. SUB~3ECT: A request for a rezoning of the property known as the Getty Oil site (the parcel immediately west of Pitkin Greek Park Condominiums in Bighorn) from Low Density Multi-Family (COME} to Arterial Business (AB) in order to build a restaurant. Applicant: Brooks Investment BACKGROUND During the last few months a request far the subject property has been before the Planning and Environmental Commission twice. First for a request to rezone the property from Low Densit MultiwFamily (COME) to Heavy Service (HS) to con- struct a service station. T~e applicant then withdrew his application air the ,, Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. The second request was before the Planning and Environmental Commission on October 24, 1983. Requested was to rezone the property from Low Density Multi- Family (COME) to Special Development District with underlying Arterial Business (AB) District and build a restaurant plus affordable condominiums. After discussion by the Planning and Environmental Commission, the applicant wanted to modify his proposal. The Planning and Environmental Commission would not hear the modified proposal, and the applicant requested the proposal be tabled until November 28. Since that time, the applicant has come back with a new request to rezone the property with no special development district request. In ]980 several requests for this property were presented to the Planning and Environmental Commission and ~to the Town Council, In the process the property was rezoned from Heavy Service (HS) to Law Density Multi-Family (COME). At that time a commercial type of use was not considered desirable at the entry way to East Vail. PROAOSAL The proposal is to rezone •the property, approximately one acre of land from LDMF to Arterial Business. The purpose is to construct a 4220 square foot restaurant that has a dining capacity of approximately 64 seats and a lounge capacity of 2O seats. On the site is also proposed parking for 54 cars. Again, the basic issue to consider is whether the property is zoned correctly with a Low Density Multi-Family zone, or should it be rezoned to Arterial Business? From a review and action by the Panning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council in 1980, the staff considers a rezoning to a business zone not _~~ • ~ Getty Oil Site -~1~21i83 in confor~~tance with the development objectives of the community or with the East Vail area. Some of the specific purposes of the zoning code state: A. TQ encourage a harmonious, convenient workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal development objectives. As noted previously in the memorandum in 1980 this property was rezoned from i-feavy Service to Low Density Multi-Family, One of the reasons for the rezoning at that time was that East Vail had no commercial or business type zoning. The Council considered the business zoning inconsistent with the established zoning in the area. I3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets. Currently under the Law Density Multi-Family zone district where 8 units could be constructed, there would be less congestion an the streets than with a restaurant. Also, if the restaurant were not successful other uses in the Arterial Business zone could be requested. C. Ta conserve and ~~~aintain established community qualities and economic values. The East Vail community has very high residential qualities. A restaurant use at this location, the. entry way to East Vail seems to be inconsistent with the established co~r~munity qualities. b. To otherwise provide for growth of an orderly and viable communit . y From previous action of the Town Council it seems that for the orderly growth of Fast Vail, a commercial/business zone should not be introduced into East nail. S I T~ P1_AiV The applicant's architect did submit a site plan, floor plan, elevations and sections of the proposed restaurant for Planning and Environmental Commission review. It should be noted that this is not a requirement of the rezoning, but provides the Planning and Environmental Commission with a view of how the restaurant i~ay work on the site. In reviewing the proposed site plan, there would be some zoning problems. First, there is an building and parking setback problem. Second, there is a front landscape problem. If the Planning and Environmental Commission considers the rezoning appropriate, changes in the site plan would be needed before presentation to the Design Review Board. '~ ~ Getty Oil Site -3 21/$3 .. REGOMh~ENDATION The Gnmmunity Oevelnpment Department recommends denial of the rezoning request . from Low Density Multi-Family to Arterial Business. First, the rezoning to Arterial Business from a residential zone is hat consistent with the zoning and character of the surrounding or East Vail neighborhood. Second, the restaurant.' use or any commercial or business use would create additional traffic congestion.;.. Third, the staff considers that residential use on the property provides for orderly growth within the community and the East Vail area. If the Planning and Environmental Commission determines that the rezoning is appropriate, they should state their findings far approval. In addition, the., Planning and Environmental Commission should restrict the use to only a restaurant. c .~ _~ marvin hatami ~ associates ~'"~ ~t haiamr a~a arcn~tecl architecture urban design and pEanning 1537 washinglon sSreet denver, coloratlo 8U203 area code 303 832-5533 REASONS FOR REQEJEST The proposed property located in the south east portion of the East Vaii exit and I-70 interchange has been the subject of a variety of rezoning proposals in the past few years. On August 5, 1982, the Vail Town Council approved the rezoning of this property fio Low Density Multi- Family {EDMF) use allowing eight {8) residential units. In order to make the development of this property economically feasible, the partitioner is proposing to change the use to allow the construct'son of a focal restaurant. The objective of the petitioner is: a. To provide a reasonably priced restaurant to serve the community. b. Ta develope this property to the best interest of the Community and Town of Vail. The initial contact has indicated that the neighborhood favors this development. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS a. The building is located close to Frontage Road and in the center of the site in order to pravide an ample buffer zone from Pitkin Creed Park development, and f-7Q. b. The restaurant is facing south and west to take advantage of the favor- able views and exposure to the sun. c. The architecture of the building compliments the surrounding develop- ments and it is compatible with its neighborhood in terms of scale and character. d. A landscaped courtyard is provided on the west side of the restaurant for summer use and amenity to dining area. e. The impact of traffic related to this development is negligible, ample parking (more than required spaces) and easy circulation is provided far this project. page two _~ marvin hatami associates hasam~ a:a architect I ~ 'r I~ LANDSCAPE TREATMENT The subject property is separated from Pitkin Creek Parl~Condominium ~ - Development at the East side by approximately 120 ft. - of stream tract which is part of Tawn of Vail. This wooded area contains Pitkin Creek and mature trees, which will remain in its natural condition, forming an excellent buffer between the properties. On the North and West the site is bordered by the State Highway Department right of way. We strongly recommend that the State Highway Department with cooperation of the Town of Vail landscape this area with wild Rocky ' Mountain flowers or any other native ground cover. This area, adjacent to East bound ramp is a gateway to East Va i I Cammun ity and its appearance is important . The south portion of the site adjacent to the Frontage Road, old US 6, will be landscaped with grass, trees, and hedges, (see site plan), COMPOSITION OF THE PRO.iECT Local Restaurant • Dining capacity 64 seats plus or minus. • Lounge capacity 20 seats plus or minus. • Fifty four (54) parking spaces . ... . ^ r; .~ ~ ~ ~ Leigh, Scott ~1 Cleary, Inc. TRANSPURTATSON PLANNING 8~ TRAFF'1C EN(;1NEERING CONSULTANTS November 10, 1983 Mr. Marvin Hatami Marvin Hatami and Associates 3.537 Washington Street Denver, CO 80203 Dear Marvin: RE; Restaurant Project Vail, Colorado LSC #95-83 1889 York Street L?enver, Colorado 80205 {303) 333-1103 In accordance with your request, we have revised our earner traffic analysis of a proposed restaurant/residential development to be located immediately east of :the East Vail Interchange between I-70 and the adjacent frontage road. Reference is made to our letter report to you dated October 3, 3.983. It is my understanding that the proposed plan is to be modified to consist of only a 64--seat quality restaurant and an associated 20-seat lounge. As such, the following traffic generation estimates are applicable: Estimated Traffic Generation Vehicles Vehicles Entering Exiting Site Site Average Weekday Traffic 100 100 Morning Peak-Haut Traffic 3 2 Evening Peak-Hour Traffic 8 4 This small amount of traffic will result in a maximum con- centration of four left-turn vehicles entering the site from the west during the evening peak-hour. This level of increased traffic activity can easily be accommodated along the existing frontage road with no noticeable reduction in operating condi- tions or traffic safety. ~~ Trenaportetion Syatema.Tranait.Parkin~.Ytiticuiar Accexs•Pedestrian e4 Bicycle Ptanning.TrafC~c Operations $ Safety•Si~ttal DesiYn.Traffic Impact Studies . _. ... .+ • ~ ~ Mr, Marvin Hatami November 10, 1983 ~_ Page Two If we can be of any further assistance on this matter, please call. -_ _ .. Respectfully submitted, _ _ LEIGH, SCOTT & CLEARY, INC. Y Philip N: Scott TIT. P.E. ,__ _ . ~ _ C i ~,.. w ~~ i I lL I 1 tCUI_LIiIV 11ViV P. 0. K 3390 Vail, Co~~o 81658 X303) 4i~-2204 November i8, 1983 Vail planning Cc;~rmission Town of Vail 75 South Fronta~~e Raad Vail , Colorado 131657 ~.adies and Gent1 emen For the sixth time, in just a few years, we are faced again, with another re-zoning proposal at the Getty Oil site in East Vail. Lupine Drive is just across, it is beautiful and quiet, one of the few resi- dential neighborhoods with single-family homes, The last thing we need is to change residential zoning to commercial. This parcel is not situated for high traffic volume such as a gas station or restaurant and bar. I know how hard it is to get on the Frontage Road at certain times from fridge Street, which is straight across from the proposed development. A school bus stop is also right on the corner. What is next, a traffic light? I also own an acre parcel next to my home and so do my two neighbors, should we be next to ask for re-zoning to commercial and then what? Move to another residential area and repeat the mistake, until there i.s no place to go anymore? The present zoning for the Getty parcel is compatible with theneighborhood and all I ask is that the out of town developers abide by the same rules as we have for the last twenty years. Sincerely, THE TYROLEAN INN J ~ ~~?t. ~ Pepi angegger ~~.~ PL/jac cc/Nail Trail Vail Daily James F. .3E~ca~ian 1: ~; ` `~~ f 1~`µ .. ~J25 ldirsvaY ~rivc ~'f),t r' .. Vai~, Uc~~praUo 81G57 ;~ S }t~ ~ - - rf ~ ~~f November 27, 1983 }~ Mr. Rick Ryan ~ ,. - ~~- . Director of Planna.r~g ,,,•: ,' Town of Vail ~~. s _ Vail, CO ~ ' RE: Getty Oil Site Dear Mr. Ryan: With reference to the application of Brooks Znvestrnents to change the zoning on the Getty Site from LDMF to Arterial Business District, T would like to go on record as opposing this change: My reasons are as follows: 1. As a recent purchaser of property in the area, one of my reasons to purchase was to build in a residen- tial area. East Vail has alwa}*s been unique in the sense that the character of the neighborhood has maintained itself as almost strictly residential. This is an asset we should not tamper with. 2. With the recent development of Pitkin Creek, the traffic flow has increased substantially. A commercial type building would only increase the traffic flot~~ and thus add to the problem. 3. In general, I feel that any planning function should be very careful when dealing with spot zoning. It is my opinion that spot zoning should only be used to enhance a neighborhood and I stress the ward enhance. With the abundance of commercial centers throughout the valley, T find it hard to accept that a commercial building in the center of a residential neighborhood would enhance anything. 4. In the past, this property has been before the Planning Commission for re-zoning many times. T see no reason why this application should be treated any differently. It is presently zoned residental and should stay residential. Sincerely, y) f / e ~ames E. Sheehan _~.J ~` ___._ Vie- ~~ ~ _ ~~2_ ~~~~~ s~~- ~ ~-~~.~~ ~~ ~ ~ %~ ~ ,~ ~~-~'~ err., .fti'~~% -- - „~~-~' ~ --- ' _._ _ _ _~ ~ -- - ,~.y-- ~/ .,~ /~ ~ ~~ t ~ ~ y _._--_--_ _____.._________-- .__---___-- - -------G~~..~~rn~ I• • r ~_. ~ ` ' ~ U///. I~IJ//IQJ fU..J~ ~~ 97 ~~ i~c°,1Jr . },_~:~. . _# _ /////~/~ a .AX ~¢ -~v /~I 1. Y/L L~In skr `tI: 1 -~; f ~.~~~~~~ a~~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~L2f S~' ~ ULLL ~ /1J l ~ f - L l Or- Q i7Lr irJ~' . r~a~er~~ j ~/e inr~f ~i?~ Q'r~ ~~ O7jP L.P Or-` L I s !1 G l~ ?z°.P/ ~~/~7TiU~ 9 D• / ePI~ n ~~ cs~ Ui e a~, ~~ce ~~ ~~ ~ ~G ~ ~ n r~~f . ~ 1~ ~ ~~~a ~ Q Graz , a Q.~ // osll ~~ _P~ir~c~e a 07? f Z /IP~°C~l G~ . ~ /~ ~jf / f ~ Q I.~' ~/IP L'1~r~11~7~iy`~~ C~P~f~o`.D~ri~/z~ C/2 /~ ~ ~'~ ~ Q'n~ rnr~rt Z~ ~n ~ ~~~ ~e -~~~~ e~ , i .~ -r ~~ ~ ~~ t~-~~~ . ~~~. ~~ ~~~~ . ~~ ~~ `~~ ~~~~~ ~ •~~ ~ ~. ~~ r ~ ~,-t., ~ ~. ~- , ~ ~ 1 ~~ .s ~~ ~~c ~'~~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ t,~,.._.. ,~ ,~ "`~~ G.~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ s 6 0~ a Li r ~ C ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~~ ~~ . ~j N In/ r r J c_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ {~~A~ - . V 1 ~1 4 - ~ ~ ~ -, ~ __ ,~. --~~~ } ~ r/r' : L /O ~~~~~ F ~~ ~j f ~` }h !}y`~ § ~ ~ i.. [ . ~ ~ + ~ i TT t~'t ._ ~' *~ r } A 111V/~l~ ~ ' ., .. ~ _ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r, ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r ' ~' c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ E , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ r ~ ~ . ~. ~ ~ '~ o ., ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f r" ~'' ~ ° . ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ --~~ ,, wr . ~.. ~~ ! • SUR r, /PETITION THE BROOI{S INVESTI~NT CO. t'!HO PROPOSED THE GAS STATION/CAR WASH NEXT TO PITitIN CREEK PARK {AND SO GRACIOIISLY b'JITIIDREti`l) WANTS TO INVxTE ALL YNTEREST%D PARTTE5 TO GIVE THEIR INPUT/IDEAS ON tiVHAT~I~'JOULD $E FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE FOR SITE IN QUESTION. TREY', ARC}VE ALL=. SYANT ANY PROTECT TO BE IN THE REST SNTEREST FOR ALL CONCERNED. ONE PRO POSAL IS A LOCALS RESTAURANT. EXAMPLE: A REASONABLX PRICED ESTAB- LISII~TENI PROVIAING PIZZAS SUF~~ SALAD BAR, HORS DtOEUVRES/NATCHOSf SPECIALTY ITEMS, COCKTAILSr ETC. POSSIBLY A PIANO BAR/ENTERTAINMENT= VIDEO GAI~ESs SPORTS 1S7IDE SCREEN T.V., BILLIARDS, PING PONG, VOLLEY BALL { SUP~IP+ ~ R) AI'~D MORE. A PLACE FOR LOCALS TO HAVE FUN AT A MIPdIMUM COST! THE BROOKS INVESTMENT CO. WANDS TO HOST A ti'IINE & CHEESE PARTY TO DEAR EVERYONE. PLEASE SIGN flELO',J AND INCLUDE YOUR PHONE NU3~BER SO l7E CAN NOTIFY YOU ~~dHEN AN~7 VdHERE TI-IE PARTY ''JILL BE HELD. r L ~° IC?R MORE INFORPFiATTON, CALL: HURRAY HEA~INGER X76•-~$2~ NAME & PHONE NU1~7B~ ~ ~ S.l~'Y ~ f~~ ;~~~~ s~~/ }~ ~ ~~ -~,~ /`~ .\ ~~ r FOR RESTAURANT i !~ L- ~. -'~ _ ~ / l 1~ ~,/ L / ~ f/ ~ ~' ~ /~ / /~+ 7 ~~ ~. ~ '1 ~__. ) C t nP a 1 ~ ''~ ~ a \' . ~ ~ ~ ~ .~-, ~'J ~~ AGAINST ;,~ z~ ~---_ ,~ 1_ _ ~. „ ~,~t~tlY ;~, ' SURVEY/P~;TITION '~F 4~° ~' ~YA,`~~f' THE F3RDOKS INVESTMENT CO. V~HO PROPOSED THE GAS STATION/CAR VdASH NEXT TO PITKIN CREEK PARK (AND SO GRACIOUSLY V~ITHDREti'1) V~ANTS TO INVITE ^ti -` `-~` ALL INTERESTED PARTIES TO GIVE THEIR INPUT/IDEAS ON tiYHAT V~OULD BE _ FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE FOR SITE IN QUESTION. THEY, ABOVE ALLY, WANT_~~ ANY PRDJECT TO BE IN THE BEST INTEREST FOR ALL CONCERNED. ONE PRO-~.~.; POSAL IS A LOCALS RESTAURANT. EXAMPLE: A REASONABLY PRICED ESTAB-~ ,,_ , LISHMENT PROVIDING PIZZA, SUSS, SALAD BAR, HORS D"OEUVRES/NATCHOS~ . . SPECIALTY ITEN~S, COCI~TAILS ~. ETG. POSSIBLY A PIANO BAR/ENTERTAINMENTr VIDEO GA-'~fES" SPORTS ti'IIDE SCREERr T.V., nILLIARDS~ PING PONG~ VOLLEY BALL (SUM~~) AND MORE, A PLACE FOR LOCALS TO HAVE FiJN AT A MINIMUM COSTI THE BROOKS INVESTMENT CO. V~AN~S TO HOST A MINE & CHEESE PARTY TO HEAR EVERYONE. PLEASE SIGN HELO'~~ AND INCLUDE YOUR PHONE NUMBER SO ~'!E CAN NOTIFY YOU '.'THEN AND ';JHERE THE PARTY ~~lILL BE HELDr FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL: HURRAY HEMINGER ~?b.-b82.~. NAME & PHONE PNI~~BE~i. FOR RESTAURANT ~ y 1~ r--; C ! ~ ~ ~'S~Ca~_-a -~l, ~"I it - C~ 3 3 ~S -- ~~ AGAINST' ~~ i . ~ ~. ~~ • - sUr~v~Y/PET~TTaN THE BROOKS TNVEST,'~9ENT CO. 1lHO PROPOSED THE GAS STATxON/CAR VTASH NEXT TO PxTKTN CR%EK PARK (AND SO GR.~.CTOUSLY ti'lIT~-IDRE1V) WANTS TO INVITE ALL xNTERESTE- PARTIES TO GIVE THEIR INPUT/IDEAS ON WHAT YJOULD BE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE FOR SITE IN QUESTION. THEY, ABOVE ALL,.EYANT ANY PROJECT TO IlE TN T~~ BEST TNTE~:EST FOR ALL COiVCERi~iED. ONE PRO- POSAL IS A LOCALS RESTAURANT. EXAMPLE: A REASONAHLY PRICED ESTAB-» LISI-I~zCNT PRQVTDING PIZZA, SUBC, SALAD EAR, HORS D'OEUVRES/NATCHOS, SPECIALTY TTEN,S, LOCI{TAILS,. ETC. POSSIBLY A PIANO BAR/ENTERTAINMENT,, UTDEO GA,'~'IES, SPORTS tiVIDE SCREEN T.V., IlILLTARDS, PING POND, VOLLEY BALL {SUr•IIVIER) AND MORE. A PLACE FOR LOCALS TO HAVE FUN AT A MINIMUM 1 COSTS THE BROOKS TNVEST~~NT CO. VlAN~S TO LOST A ~'lzNE & CHEESE PARTY TO HEAR EVERYONE. PLEASE SIGN HELO~~ AND SNCLUDE YOUR PHONE NUI~{BER SO 1'!E CAN NQTTFY YOU l'lHEN A~iD ~'lHERE THE PARTY L"TILL IlE HELD. FOR MORE INFCRrYIATION, CALL: HURRAY HEMINGER X76--68~1~ NAME & PHONE I~U1i~7~~x FOR RESTAURANT _ ~ ~.~ ~\ r~~ C~~ r~ m , ~ ~ ~ - a 3~ ~ . ~~ ,~~iu~' ~ 7 ~ ° Z 77a ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ r~tl~~~ ~' ~ - .~ .- ~~~~~ ~ 11 ~ -- J _ ~~~ -~ `~ ~-~G_~:J.-~ __ ~- ~~:- ~~~ fir ,ti p!:;~~ X X ~X x ~- _, ~1 x ~...~-- i /~ r _ AGAINST .~.. ~. ' suRVr~Y%~'ETITTON n THE BROOKS INVESTMENT CO „ VJHO PROPOSED THE ,GAS STATION/CAR ti'dASH NEXT TO PxTKTN CREEK PARK {AND SO GRACIOUiLY V~TT~IDRE4'J} WANTS TO INVITE 'r~.- `4 ALL INTERESTED PARTIES TO GIVE THEIR INPUT/IDEAS ON WHAT WOULD BE ~~ FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE FOR SITE IN QUESTION. 'rrsr,:Y, ABOVE ALL,. ~YANT ANY PROJECT TO BE TN THE BEST INTEREST FOR ALL CONCERNED. ONE PRO~`~' POSAL TS A LOCALS RESTAURANT. EXAMPLE: A REASONABLY PRICED ESTA&- LxSHMENT PROVIDING PIZZA, SUBS, SALAD BAR, HORS D~OEUVRES/NATCHOS~. -_ SPECIALTY ITEMS, COCKTAILS! ETC, POSSTHLY A PIANO BAR/E1~:~~~xTAINMENT,. VIDEO GAMEa, SPORTS tiVTDE SCREEN T.V., BILLIARDS, PING PONG, VOLLEY- -. BALL (SUMI~1ER} AND MORE. A PLACE FOR LOCALS TO HAVE FUN AT A MINIMUM COSTi ~t~tt.~: BROOKS TNVESTL~NT CO. V'JAN~S TO HOST A ti'lINE & CHEESE PARTY TO HEAR EVERYONE. PLEASE SIGN HELOT! AND INCLUDE YOUR PHONE NUMBER SO ~"!E CAN NOTIFY YOU YIHEN AND YJT.~RE THE PARTY ~r`JTLL BE HELD. FY}R MORE INFORI4;ATION, CALL; HURRAY HEI`3TNGER 1.r7b-b821-~ NAME & PHONE-~~NVI~?BER I '~ ~ ~• ~ / ~~. , .........-..~.... 1 ^ ~~~- ~~~ ` r` ~ ,- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~~~ ~~~ ~~-~ c~ ~-~ ~~ ~ i ~J L : _. _ _ ._. ...... __ . ._ . _._. I ti.'' ` `w~ .... .. - . FOR RESTAURANT l~ ~_ fr L/ ~~ L-' ~~ (.r . L._~- f~/ ..~ f ~' , v ~~ ` ,~ i~ AGAINST ~I FI :j~~ it