Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-06-18 Agenda and Supporting Documentation Town Council Evening Meeting Agenda VAIL TO W N C O U N C IL R E G U L AR ME E TIN G Evening Agenda Town Council C hambers 6:00 P M, June 18, 2019 Notes: Times of items are approximate, subject to c hange, and cannot be relied upon to determine what time C ounc il will consider an item. Public comment will be taken on each agenda item. Citizen participation offers an opportunity for citizens to express opinions or ask questions regarding town services, policies or other matters of community conc ern, and any items that are not on the agenda. Please attempt to keep c omments to three minutes; time limits established are to provide efficienc y in the c onduct of the meeting and to allow equal opportunity for everyone wishing to speak. 1.Citizen Participation (10 min.) 2.Consent Agenda (5 min.) 2.1.Resolution No. 26, Series of 2019, A Resolution Approving an I ntergovernmental Agreement Between the Town of Vail and the Town of Gypsum for Electrical I nspection Services. Background: The State of Colorado, per C.R.S. 12-23-115, requires that electrical inspectors be State licensed electricians. Therefore, in order to provide this service to Town of Vail customers, we have a licensed electrician on staff to perform the proper inspections. However, when our employee is not available for any reason (i.e.: vacation, injury/sick leave, etc.), we will be unable to provide this service to our customers. Thus, we would like to enter into an agreement with the Town of Gypsum to provide "backup coverage" on an as-needed basis. Staff Recommendation: Approve, approve with amendments or deny Resolution No. 26, Series of 2019. 2.2.Resolution No. 27, Series of 2019, A Resolution Approving an I ntergovernmental Agreement Between the Town of Vail and the United States Department of Transportation Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Background: I n recent years, parking lots and access roads to several of the area’s most popular trailheads have become congested, trails have become wider due to increased foot traffic, and crowding has negatively affected the experiences of visitors and nearby neighbors to these areas. I n an effort to address these issues the Town of Vail and Volpe Center wish to enter into an agreement for services related to transportation planning assistance and implementation support Staff Recommendation: Approve, approve with amendments or deny Resolution No. 27, Series of 2019. 2.3.Forest Road Bridge Repair Contract Award June 18, 2019 - Page 1 of 404 Background: Town staff received two bids for the Forest Road Bridge Repair project, with I con, I nc. the low responsible bidder. The project includes bridge wingwall repair, new approach rails and pedestrian height bridge rails. The project will require a full bridge closure over Gore Creek and traffic will be detoured to Vail Road. The project is within budget. The project is scheduled to be completed between August 12 and September 27, 2019. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with I con, I nc. to complete the Forest Road Bridge Repair project in the amount not to exceed $292,000.00. 2.4.Kinnikinnick Road Bridge Repair Contract Award Background: Town staff received two bids for the Kinnikinnick Road Bridge Repair project, with G.A. W estern Construction Company the low responsible bidder. The project includes replacing the existing bridge deck, new approach and bridge rails. The project will require a full bridge closure over Gore Creek and traffic will be detoured to the east Kinnikinnick Road intersection with the South Frontage Road. The project is within budget. The project is scheduled to be completed between J uly 8 and September 27, 2019. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with G.A. W estern Construction Company to complete the Kinnikinnick Road Bridge Repair project in the amount not to exceed $330,350.00. 2.5.Ground Engineering Bridge Road Agreement Background: Staff received 1 submittal for the request for proposals to provide construction inspection on the Bridge Road Bridge Replacement Project. This project is partially funded with a $1,000,000.00 bridge replacement grant from the Colorado Department of Transportation for the design and construction of the Bridge Road Bridge Replacement. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Ground Engineering to complete construction inspection on the Bridge Road Bridge Replacement Project in the amount not to exceed $81,000.00. 2.6.Buffehr Creek Road Quality I mprovements Contract Award Background: Town staff received three bids for the Buffehr Creek Road W ater Quality I mprovements project, with I con, I nc. the low responsible bidder. The uphill ditch along Buffehr Creek Road above 1701 Buffehr Creek Rd has significant scour due to the steep grade of the roadway. This scour discharges the sediment directly into Buffer Creek. To prevent this sediment from entering Buffehr Creek the project includes installing 1,000 feet of curb and gutter to prevent ditch erosion and 3 inlets with deep sumps to trap sediment. The project is within the engineer ’s estimate. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with I con, I nc. to complete the Buffehr Creek Road Water Quality I mprovements project in the amount not to exceed $125,000.00. 3.Town Manager Report 3.1.Town Manager Recruitment Update 5 min. Presenter(s): Krista Miller, HR & Risk Management Director June 18, 2019 - Page 2 of 404 3.2.Verbal Update on New Development Plan for Booth Heights 5 min. Presenter(s): Matt Gennett, Director of Community Development 4.Presentations / Discussion 4.1.Civic Area Plan Update – Presentation of Four Master Plan Concepts, Rough Costs and Revenue Potential 90 min. Presenter(s): Matt Gennett, Community Development Director Action Requested of Council: Staff asks Council to review the presentation and provide direction related to narrowing the four master plan concepts to two. Background: The purpose of this work session is to share the four master plan concepts ideas with the Town Council and receive direction from Council to narrow the number of concepts to two. The project team will then share the design concepts through Engage Vail as well as “pop-up” outreach events and stakeholder focus groups. Staff Recommendation: No recommendation at this time. 4.2.Presentation of the 2019 Vail Community Housing Survey Results 60 min. Presenter(s): George Ruther, Housing Director, David Flaherty, Magellan Strategies, David Cunningham, Summit I nformation Services Action Requested of Council: Listen to the presentation and schedule a future discussion of possible next steps Background: The Vail Local Housing Authority, acting in partnership with the Vail Town Council, contracted the consulting services of Summit I nformation Systems and Magellan Strategies to conduct a Vail Community Housing Survey. The purpose of the survey was two-fold: 1) to measure and understand the general opinions of the Vail community regarding the availability of housing and awareness of ongoing town policies and programs to address the housing need, and 2) to measure general support for a potential tax initiative to establish a permanent and consistent funding source for town-sponsored housing programs. Staff Recommendation: Please refer to the memorandum dated J une 18, 2019 for the recommendation from town staff. 5.Action Items 5.1.Resolution No. 28, Series of 2019 a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Homestake Unit B212, 1081 Vail View Drive, Vail, Colorado. 5 min. Presenter(s): George Ruther, Housing Director Action Requested of Council: Approved, Approve with Modifications, or Deny Resolution No. 28, Series of 2019 Background: The availability of housing for its employees remains an ongoing need for the Town of Vail municipal government. As the third largest employer in Vail, the Town of Vail too is challenged by the need for housing for its workforce. Over the years the Town has taken a wide range of approaches to addressing its employee housing needs, including “buying down” homes for purchase by Town of Vail employees. Staff Recommendation: The Vail Town staff recommends the Vail Town Council approves Resolution No. 28, Series of 2019, as presented. 6.Adjournment June 18, 2019 - Page 3 of 404 6.1.Adjournment 9:00 p.m. (estimate) Meeting agendas and materials can be acc es s ed prior to meeting day on the Town of Vail webs ite www.vailgov.com. All town c ouncil meetings will be streamed live by High F ive Ac cess Media and available for public viewing as the meeting is happening. T he meeting videos are als o posted to High F ive Ac cess Media website the week following meeting day, www.highfivemedia.org. P leas e c all 970-479-2136 for additional information. S ign language interpretation is available upon reques t with 48 hour notification dial 711. June 18, 2019 - Page 4 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Resolution No. 26, S eries of 2019, A Resolution Approving an I ntergovernmental A greement B etween the Town of Vail and the Town of Gypsum for E lectrical I nspection Services. B AC K G RO UND: The State of Colorado, per C.R.S. 12-23-115, requires that electrical inspectors be S tate licensed electricians. T herefore, in order to provide this service to Town of Vail customers, we have a licensed electrician on staff to perform the proper inspections. However, when our employee is not available for any reason (i.e.: vacation, injury/sick leave, etc.), we will be unable to provide this service to our customers. Thus, we would like to enter into an agreement with the Town of Gypsum to provide "backup coverage" on an as-needed basis. S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A pprove, approve with amendments or deny Resolution No. 26, S eries of 2019. AT TAC H ME N TS: Description Staff Memorandum Resolution No. 26, Series of 2019 Agreement June 18, 2019 - Page 5 of 404 To: Vail Town Council From: CJ Jarecki, Chief Building Official Matt Gennett, Community Development Director Date: June 18, 2019 Subject: Resolution No. 26, Series of 2019, Electrical Inspection Services BACKGROUND: The State of Colorado, per C.R.S. 12-23-115, requires that electrical inspectors be State licensed electricians. Therefore, in order to provide this service to Town of Vail customers, we have a licensed electrician on staff to perform the proper inspections. However, when our employee is not available for any reason (i.e.: vacation, injury/sick leave, etc.), we will be unable to provide this service to our customers. Thus, we would like to enter into an agreement with the Town of Gypsum to provide “backup coverage” on an as-needed basis. CURRENT SITUATION: Our licensed electrical inspector is taking a two week vacation that was pre-planned prior to becoming a Town of Vail employee. With this, we will be unable to provide the required electrical inspection services while he is absent. The Town of Gypsum has offered to assist during these times and have provided a Service Agreement for the proposed service(s). Currently, the Town of Gypsum has two licensed electrical inspectors on staff and both of those individuals have performed the same service within the Town of Vail. They are familiar with our inspection software systems and have familiarity with the way that we do business. Budget implications will be minimal and the Community Development budget can support the agreement without any supplemental budget considerations. PROPOSAL: Enter into an IGA/MOU with The Town of Gypsum to provide coverage, when needed. June 18, 2019 - Page 6 of 404 Resolution No. 8, Series of 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 26 SERIES OF 2019 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF VAIL AND THE TOWN OF GYPSUM FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION SERVICES WHEREAS, the Town of Vail and the Town of Gypsum could enjoy operational and financial efficiencies if Gypsum’s building inspectors performed electrical inspections within Vail when Vail’s building inspectors are on vacation; WHEREAS, the Town Councils of Gypsum and Vail have found and determined that it is in the best interest of the public that each serves to enter into an Electrical Inspection Services Agreement (the “IGA”) to provide for the provision of electrical inspection coverage within Vail. WHEREAS, the Council’s approval of this Resolution is required to enter into the IGA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, STATE OF COLORADO: Section 1. The Council hereby approves the IGA and authorizes the Town Manager to enter into the IGA in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit A and in a form approved by the Town Attorney. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. ATTEST TOWN OF VAIL ______________________________ _____________________________ Tammy Nagel, Town Clerk Dave Chapin, Mayor June 18, 2019 - Page 7 of 404 {00697460.DOCX / } 1 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of date written below, by and between the TOWN OF GYPSUM (the “Gypsum”) and the TOWN OF VAIL (the “Vail”). A. WHEREAS, Vail is a home-rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under Articles XX of the Colorado Constitution and Vail’s Home Rule Charter; and B. WHEREAS, Gypsum is a home rule municipality duly organized and existing under Articles XX of the Colorado Constitution and Gypsum’s Home Rule Charter effective October 21, 1982; and C. WHEREAS, Vail has adopted the 2018 International Building Code (the “Building Code”) and the 2017 National Electric Code (“Electric Code”); and D. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 31-15-601, C.R.S., and their respective municipal codes, Gypsum and Vail each have the power to issue and withhold building permits, and provide plan review, inspections, and permitting for electrical systems within their respective jurisdictions (“Electrical Review Services”); and E. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 29-1-203, C.R.S., the parties are authorized to enter into intergovernmental agreements for the provision of services of mutual benefit; and F. WHEREAS, Vail and Gypsum could enjoy operational and financial efficiencies if Gypsum’s building inspectors performed electrical inspections within Vail when Vail’s building inspectors are on vacation (the “Electrical Inspection Vacation Coverage”), as further provided herein; and G. WHEREAS, the Town Councils of Gypsum and Vail have found and determined that it is in the best interest of the public that each serves to enter into this Agreement to provide for the provision of Electrical Inspection Vacation Coverage within Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, Gypsum and Vail agree as follows: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the responsibilities of Gypsum and Vail as regards the provision of Electrical Inspection Vacation Coverage within Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 8 of 404 {00697460.DOCX / } 2 2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall begin immediately upon execution and shall continue through December 31, 2019, and shall be automatically renewed for up to five (5) additional one-year terms unless terminated by written notice, such notice given not less than thirty (30) days prior to the end of the year, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. In addition, either party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause at any time by giving the other party written notice of such termination not less than thirty (30) days prior to such termination date. 3. Electrical Inspection Vacation Coverage. By written notice provided at least 10 business days in advance, Vail may request that Gypsum’s building inspectors provide substitute coverage for Vail’s electrical inspectors who are on vacation, and Gypsum, at its sole option based on Gypsum’s own workload, will make its building inspectors available to Vail during this period. Electrical Inspection Vacation Coverage will include electrical inspections only. 4. Building Inspectors Credentials. Gypsum’s building inspectors who provide the Electrical Inspection Vacation Coverage shall at all times have and maintain all licenses, certificates, credentials and education as are required under the laws of the State of Colorado and the Building Code to perform the Electrical Review Services. 5. Compensation and Reimbursement. Gypsum will be compensated for the Electrical Inspection Vacation Coverage as follows: (a) Vail will pay Gypsum $85 per hour for all inspections of electrical systems, with a minimum of one-hour charge for each inspection, plus an $85 trip charge for drive time to and from Vail for each inspection. Gypsum will provide invoices to Vail monthly, by the first week of the following month and Vail will pay the invoices within 30 days of receipt. 6. Independent Contractors. In performing any acts or duties contained in this Agreement, the Gypsum building inspectors will remain employees of Gypsum for all purposes, including but not limited to, all employment-related laws and regulations including payment of Worker’s Compensation and compliance with the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, and shall not be considered an employee of Vail. It is expressly acknowledged and understood by the parties hereto that nothing contained in this Agreement shall result in, or be construed as, establishing an employment relationship. Gypsum’s building inspectors shall perform as independent contractors. No agent, subcontractor, employee, or Gypsum shall be, or deemed to be, the employee, agent or servant of Vail. Gypsum’s building inspectors shall not represent, act, purport to act or be deemed the agent, representative, employee or servant of Vail. 7. Indemnification. To the maximum extent allowed by law and without either party waiving the protections and limitations of the Colorado Governmental Immunity June 18, 2019 - Page 9 of 404 {00697460.DOCX / } 3 Act, the parties agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless each other, their respective agents, officers, servants, volunteers and employees of and from any and all losses, costs, damages, injuries, liability, claims, liens, demands, actions and causes of action whatsoever, arising out of or related to their own intentional or negligent acts, errors or omissions, or those of their agents, officers, servants and employees, whether contractual or otherwise, related to performance or lack of performance of this Agreement. This indemnity provision specifically includes all general building inspection services performed by, or on behalf of, either party. 8. Insurance. Each party shall provide its own public liability and property damage insurance coverage as it may deem necessary for any potential liability arising from this provision of this Agreement. 9. Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assigned or amended by either party, unless in writing executed by both parties. 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the full understanding of Gypsum and Vail and supersedes all prior understandings, agreements and discussion of Gypsum and Vail regarding the subject matter. 11. Annual Appropriation. Any obligation of either party under this Agreement that is dependent upon the expenditure of funds by such party shall be conditioned upon the annual appropriation of funds by such party’s governing body in its sole discretion. 12. Miscellaneous. (a) This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. Venue for any legal action shall be in Eagle County District Court. (b) All notices, requests, demands, consents and other communications hereunder shall be transmitted in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when hand-delivered or sent by certified, United States mail, postage prepaid, with return receipt requested, addressed to the parties as follows: Town of Gypsum Attn: Building Inspector 50 Lundgren Boulevard PO Box 130 Gypsum, CO 81637 Town of Vail Attn: Building Official June 18, 2019 - Page 10 of 404 {00697460.DOCX / } 4 75 S Frontage Road W Vail, CO 81657 (c) Nothing herein expressed or implied is intended or should be construed to confer or give to any person or corporation or governmental entity other than Vail and Gypsum, any right, remedy or claim under or by reason hereof or by reason of any covenant or condition herein contained, nor limit in any way the powers and responsibilities of Gypsum, Vail, or any other entity not a party hereto. (d) If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction as to either party or as to both parties, such portion shall be deemed severable and its invalidity or its unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions; such remaining provisions shall be fully severable and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such invalid provisions had never been inserted into this Agreement. (e) This Agreement may be amended from time to time by a written agreement duly authorized and executed by all the parties to this Agreement. (f) This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of the parties, and supersedes any prior agreements, discussions, negotiations, representations or understandings of the parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein. [Signature page follows] June 18, 2019 - Page 11 of 404 {00697460.DOCX / } 5 EXECUTED as of the _______ day of June, 2019. GYPSUM OF GYPSUM By: Steve Carver, Mayor Attest: Danette Schlegel, Town Clerk TOWN OF VAIL By: Patty McKenny, Town Manager Attest: Tammy Nagel, Town Clerk June 18, 2019 - Page 12 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Resolution No. 27, S eries of 2019, A Resolution Approving an I ntergovernmental A greement B etween the Town of Vail and the United States Department of Transportation Office of the A ssistant Secretary for Research and Technology Volpe National Transportation Systems Center B AC K G RO UND: I n recent years, parking lots and access roads to several of the area’s most popular trailheads have become congested, trails have become wider due to increased foot traffic, and crowding has negatively affected the experiences of visitors and nearby neighbors to these areas. I n an effort to address these issues the Town of Vail and Volpe Center wish to enter into an agreement for services related to transportation planning assistance and implementation support S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A pprove, approve with amendments or deny Resolution No. 27, S eries of 2019. AT TAC H ME N TS: Description Resolution No. 27, Series of 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 13 of 404 Resolution No. 27 Series of 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 27 SERIES OF 2019 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF VAIL AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY VOLPE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER WHEREAS, in recent years, parking lots and access roads t o several of the area’s most popular trailheads have become congested, trails have become wider due to increased foot traffic, and crowding has negatively affected the experiences of visitors and nearby neighbors to these areas; WHEREAS, because if its expertise in transportation planning in public lands, The Town of Vail has asked the John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (the “Volpe Center”) to help address these issues; WHEREAS, in an effort to address the issues stated above the Town of Vail and Volpe Center wish to enter into an agreement for services related to transportation planning assistance and implementation support (the “IGA”); and WHEREAS, the Council’s approval of this Resolution is required to enter into the IGA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, STATE OF COLORADO: Section 1. The Council hereby approves the IGA and authorizes the Town Manager to enter into the IGA in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit A and in a form approved by the Town Attorney. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. ATTEST TOWN OF VAIL ______________________________ _____________________________ Tammy Nagel, Town Clerk Dave Chapin, Mayor June 18, 2019 - Page 14 of 404 AGRMNTTEMPVOLDIR 12/4/17 1 VOLPE AGREEMENT NO. VPQ2 BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY VOLPE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER AND TOWN OF VAIL The Agreement between the aforementioned parties is for the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center) to perform in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW), subject to the terms and limitations detailed herein. I. STATEMENT OF WORK (See attached). II. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION The Volpe Center will perform work in accordance with the attached SOW that is incorporated into the Agreement. TheVolpe Center may use support service contractors and other contract support as the Volpe Center deems necessary. III. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The Volpe Center will start work upon receipt of funds. Work shall continue until it is completed. The Volpe Center intends to complete all work detailed in the SOW by May 30, 2024. If additional time becomes necessary to complete this work within the funding provided, the parties may agree in writing to extend the period of performance. Provided remaining funds are sufficient to cover remaining performance and closeout costs, such extension shall be at no additional cost to the Town of Vail. IV. FUNDING The Volpe Center shall perform work on a BEST EFFORT (not fixed price), NO FEE BASIS. Charges will reflect only actual costs and no profit. The amount indicated below is the Volpe Center’s estimate of the funds needed to accomplish the tasks detailed in the SOW. Should the work be accomplished, or terminated, before funds are exhausted, the balance will be returned by mutual agreement between the Volpe Center and the Town of Vail and consistent with paragraph VIII – Termination of Work. Should funds be exhausted, all work will stop at that point unless and until additional funds are provided. Estimated Cost: $150,000 June 18, 2019 - Page 15 of 404 AGRMNTTEMPVOLDIR 12/4/17 2 Performance of the work called for in the attached SOW is estimated to cost $150,000. This estimate includes actual direct and indirect costs associated with the tasks as specified in the SOW, including their execution, management, and administration. V. ADVANCES The Town of Vail shall advance funds to the Volpe Center before work starts in accordance with the Volpe Center’s authorizing legislation, 49 USC §328. The Town of Vail will provide advances in accordance with the following schedule. Should funds become exhausted, work will cease unless and until such time as the next advance is received. The Volpe Center will bill the Town of Vail in accordance with the following schedule of advances or more frequently as required via SF-1115 (Bill for Collection) or any specific form required by the Town of Vail. SCHEDULE OF ADVANCES AMOUNT UPON APPROVAL OF THIS AGREEMENT $30,000.00 VI. BILLING AND PAYMENT INFORMATION The Town of Vail may electronically transfer payments to the Volpe Center through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York by using the following banking information: Type/Subtype Code 10 00 ABA Number 021030004 Receiver DFI Name: TREAS NYC Business Function CTR Beneficiary D 69010004 Alternatively, the Town of Vail may send payment by check directly to the: U.S. Department of Transportation Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Attn: Accounting Office, V-132 55 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Payments will be made to the order of: “DOT/Volpe National Transportation Systems Center” Any questions regarding project cash advances should be directed to: Gregory Zevitas June 18, 2019 - Page 16 of 404 AGRMNTTEMPVOLDIR 12/4/17 3 617-494-3834 Gregory.zevitas@dot.gov The following information is required for the Volpe Center’s customer billing profile. Please supply the Town of Vail taxpayer/employer identification and DUNS numbers: TIN/EIN: __________________________ DUNS: __________________________ VII. FINANCIAL REPORTS The Volpe Center shall provide the Town of Vail with a monthly report of total commitments and obligations made to date in the standard format provided to all Volpe Center customers. Summary financial reports are distributed to the customer financial point of contact identified in Section XVI unless noted otherwise. In such case, a “Send Financial Reports To” section needs to be included with the following information: customer accounting contact name, telephone number, email address, and regular mail address. VIII. TERMINATION OF WORK Work may be terminated 30 calendar days after receipt of written notice by the Office of Financial Management, Volpe Center, V-130. The Town of Vail is responsible for all costs incurred through the termination date and for any additional costs incurred which the Volpe Center judges are necessary to complete an orderly program close. The Volpe Center will return any remaining funds to Town of Vail. IX. CHANGES TO THE AGREEMENT Changes may be made by mutual written agreement. X. GOVERNING LAW The laws of the United States shall govern the construction, validity, performance, and effect of this Agreement for all purposes. XI. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES The Volpe Center and the Town of Vail agree to work cooperatively in carrying out their responsibilities under this Agreement. Staff members from the Volpe Center and the Town of Vail will resolve disagreements informally. The appropriate administrative managers for the Volpe Center and the Town of Vail shall confer as necessary to resolve the dispute that their respective staff members are unable to resolve. XII. WARRANTY June 18, 2019 - Page 17 of 404 AGRMNTTEMPVOLDIR 12/4/17 4 The Volpe Center makes no express or implied warranties as to any matter whatsoever. XIII. RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA The Town of Vail will have an unlimited non-exclusive license to data first produced in the performance of this Agreement. Unless subject to statutory exemptions, such data will be publicly available under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. XIV. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS a. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or will be deemed to affect the ownership rights of the parties with respect to their existing copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, patents, or other intellectual property and proprietary rights, if any. The United States Government reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use data first produced in the performance of this Agreement for Government purposes. XV. USE OF NAME OR ENDORSEMENTS The Town of Vail or its agents shall not, in any way, state or imply that this Agreement is an endorsement by the Government of it or any of its products or services. The work done by the Volpe Center on this project does not reflect the policies of the Department of Transportation. XVI. PUBLICITY The Town of Vail or its agents shall not, in any way, publicize Volpe Center participation in this project without prior written consent. XVII. NO BENEFITS No member of or delegate to the United States Congress, or resident commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of this Agreement, nor to any benefit that may arise therefrom; but this provision shall not be construed to extend to this Agreement if made with a corporation for its general benefit. XVIII. PUBLICATION The parties acknowledge that the Volpe Center is performing work under this Agreement for the Town of Vail. At the conclusion of the work described herein, the Volpe Center will provide a report of results to the Town of Vail. XIX. POINTS OF CONTACT For the Volpe Center: Kendall Square June 18, 2019 - Page 18 of 404 AGRMNTTEMPVOLDIR 12/4/17 5 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 Program Manager: Benjamin Rasmussen, V-323 617-494-2768 Benjamin.Rasmussen@dot.gov Financial Information: Kristin Campbell, V-131 617-494-3847 Kristin.Campbell@dot.gov Billing Office: Gregory Zevitas 617-494-3834 Gregory.Zevitas@dot.gov For the Town of Vail: Town Manager: Patty McKenny Program Director: Dwight Henninger Principal Investigator: Financial/Contract Kathleen Halloran Information: khalloran@vailgov.com 970 479-2116 Bill to: Name: Town of Vail Attn; Dwight Henninger Telephone Number: 970 479-2218 Email Address: dhenninger@vailgov.com Mailing Address: 75 S. Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657 XX. SUBJECT TO ANNUAL APPROPRIATION Consistent with Article X, § 20 of the Colorado Constitution, any financial obligation of the Town of Vail not performed during the current fiscal year is subject to annual appropriation, shall extend only to monies currently appropriated, and shall not constitute a mandatory charge, requirement, debt or liability beyond the current fiscal year. June 18, 2019 - Page 19 of 404 AGRMNTTEMPVOLDIR 12/4/17 6 AUTHORIZED APPROVALS Signatures: Reimbursing Organization Organization to be Reimbursed By: Patty McKenney Anne D. Aylward Title: Interim Town Manager Director For: Town of Vail Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Date: Date: June 18, 2019 - Page 20 of 404 Page 1 of 4 Statement of Work Town of Vail Transportation Planning Technical Support Agreement #VPQ2 June 18, 2019 - Page 21 of 404 Page 2 of 4 TOWN OF VAIL T R A N S P O R TA T I O N P L A N N I N G T E C H N I C A L S U P P O R T 1.1 B A C K G R O U ND The Town of Vail was incorporated in 1966, four years after the ski resort that bears its name was founded. Today, the ski resort is America’s most visited ski area and draws over 1.6 million annual visitors a year. However, people are increasingly visiting Vail in all seasons to participate in hiking; road and mountain biking; fly-fishing; golfing; rafting; on-mountain adventure courses; and wildlife, wildflower, and fall foliage viewing and photography. These activities take place on 1,100 acres of open space accounting for 50 percent of Vail’s town-owned land; 350,000 surrounding acres of the White River National Forest, which includes 5,289 skiable acres on one of the largest ski mountains in the world; 17 miles of recreation paths; numerous special events; the highest botanical gardens in the world and an outdoor amphitheater named for the Town’s most famous resident, President Gerald R. Ford. The Town’s net revenue annual budget provides funding for one of the largest free transportation systems in the country. In recent years, parking lots and access roads to several of the area’s most popular trailheads have become congested, trails have become wider due to increased foot traffic, and crowding has negatively affected the experiences of visitors and nearby neighbors to these areas. With its expertise in transportation planning in public lands, The Town of Vail has asked the John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (the Volpe Center) to help address these issues. This interagency agreement (IAA) builds upon the agreement in place between the Volpe Center and the White River National Forest (VXP8A2). 1.2 S C O PE O F W ORK Through this agreement, the Volpe Center will provide transportation technical assistance to the Town of Vail. All projects authorized under this agreement fall into one general task: Transportation Planning Assistance and Implementation Support. Details of this task are presented in Section 2 of this agreement. All costs listed in this agreement are for Volpe Center staff involvement only. Costs associated with any other project participants are not included. This agreement can be amended upon agreement of the signature parties to add specific tasks. If additional work is added under this agreement in the future, new tasks will be contingent upon the availability of funds and a modification will be executed to add additional funding under the original agreement. For each individual project, a work plan, known as a project agreement, describing the scope of work, roles and responsibilities, project schedule, and project funding, must be developed prior to beginning an y work. Work shall be on a best effort, no fee basis, and charges will reflect onl y actual costs and no profit. Work will start upon execution of the agreement and the receipt of funds. The scope of work ma y be modified b y agreement by both parties. 1.3 SCHEDUL E June 18, 2019 - Page 22 of 404 Page 3 of 4 The master project will span approximately five fiscal years from execution of the agreement. The period of performance for VPQ2 will run until 5/30/2024. The Volpe Center effort, in support of the tasks, will commence immediately upon approval of this agreement and availability of funding. Specific project deadlines, including completion dates, will be documented at the working level for each project. 2 T R A N S P O R TA T I O N P L A N N I N G A SSI S TA N C E A N D I M P L E M E N TA T I O N S U P P O RT 2.1 TASK O VERV IEW The Town of Vail requests technical support as it plans for and carries out transportation planning and implementation projects. 2.2 TASK SU BJE CT AR E AS The Volpe Center will provide transportation planning assistance and implementation support to the Town of Vail in cooperation with the White River National Forest. Projects performed under this task will encompass comprehensive transportation issues involving roadways, bridges, parking areas, transportation facilities and equipment, alternative transportation strategies, communication technology, non-motorized transportation, operational and maintenance costs, and connectivity of transportation elements, including: • Alternative fuels analysis; • Alternative transportation system monitoring and evaluation; • Alternative transportation vehicle selection, procurement, and maintenance; • Benefit-cost assessment; • Best practices and lessons learned; • Communication/public outreach planning; • Conceptual design work; • Fare and fee payment systems; • Funding strategy and implementation; • Innovative partnering and financing strategies; • Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS); • Interpretive planning; • Non-motorized transportation; • Preliminary engineering work; • Presentation development; • Program and legislative support; • Program assessment; • Program performance measurement and data requirements for evaluation; • Project proposal review and evaluation; • Public meeting facilitation; • Signage planning and development; • Stakeholder outreach, communication, and engagement; • Statement of work reviews; • Survey design, development, and administration; • Sustainable transportation; • Technical reviews of planning products; June 18, 2019 - Page 23 of 404 Page 4 of 4 • Transportation Assistance Group (TAG) coordination; • Transportation planning and policy; • Transportation safety and security; • Vehicle acquisition techniques; • Vehicle inventory; • Vehicle technologies; • Video development and simulations; and • Visitor capacity analysis. Limited travel to the Town of Vail, in the form of site visits and meeting attendance, is anticipated for this task. For each project, deliverables may include memoranda summarizing technical input, project meeting minutes, and/or brief reports. 2.3 PROJE CT MANAGEM E NT Each project will include project management-related subtasks, such as preparation of project management/work plans, schedules, budgets, monthly progress reports, participation in relevant meetings, and project management assistance in reviewing and refining individual project implementation plans. 2.4 SCHEDUL E The Volpe Center will respond to requests b y the Town of Vail for transportation assistance and support with a written work plan, including schedule and budget, within two weeks of the request. Each work plan will be sent to the Town of Vail for approval. 2.5 SAMPLE B UDGET This IAA is understood to be severable work and is expected to be funded in more than one funding increment. The total expected budget authority for the duration of the master project and the first funding increment are shown below. This sample budget represents $30,000 per year for support of the task subject areas outlined above. The Volpe Center’s use plan for the new funding is below: Volpe Use of Funds Total Expected Budget Authority First Increment Budget Authority Volpe Direct Labor $140,000 $28,000 Volpe Contract Support $0 $0 Travel $10,000 $2,000 Other $0 $0 TOTAL $150,000 $30,000 Task Total Expected Budget Authority First Increment Budget Authority 2. Transportation Planning Assistance and Implementation Support $150,000 $30,000 June 18, 2019 - Page 24 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: F orest Road B ridge Repair Contract Award AC T IO N RE Q UE S T E D O F C O UNC I L: A uthorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement with I con, I nc. to complete the Forest Road Bridge Repair project. B AC K G RO UND: Town staff received two bids for the Forest Road Bridge Repair project, with I con, I nc. the low responsible bidder. T he project includes bridge wingwall repair, new approach rails and pedestrian height bridge rails. T he project will require a full bridge closure over Gore Creek and traffic will be detoured to Vail Road. T he project is within budget. T he project is scheduled to be completed between A ugust 12 and S eptember 27, 2019. S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A uthorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town A ttorney, with I con, I nc. to complete the Forest Road Bridge Repair project in the amount not to exceed $292,000.00. AT TAC H ME N TS: Description memo June 18, 2019 - Page 25 of 404 To: Town Council From: Public Works Date: 03/05/2019 Subject: Forest Road Bridge Repair Contract Award I. ITEM/TOPIC Forest Road Bridge Repair Contract Award II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement with Icon, Inc. to complete the Forest Road Bridge Repair project. III. BACKGROUND Town staff received two bids for the Forest Road Bridge Repair project, with Icon, Inc. the low responsible bidder. The project includes bridge wingwall repair, new approach rails and pedestrian height bridge rails. The project will require a full bridge closure over Gore Creek and traffic will be detoured to Vail Road. The project is within budget. The project is scheduled to be completed between August 12 and September 27, 2019. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Icon, Inc. to complete the Forest Road Bridge Repair project in the amount not to exceed $292,000.00. June 18, 2019 - Page 26 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Kinnikinnick Road B ridge Repair Contract Award AC T IO N RE Q UE S T E D O F C O UNC I L: A uthorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement with G.A . Western Construction Company to complete the K innikinnick Road Bridge Repair project. B AC K G RO UND: Town staff received two bids for the K innikinnick Road Bridge Repair project, with G.A . Western Construction Company the low responsible bidder. The project includes replacing the existing bridge deck, new approach and bridge rails. T he project will require a full bridge closure over Gore Creek and traffic will be detoured to the east Kinnikinnick Road intersection with the S outh F rontage Road. T he project is within budget. T he project is scheduled to be completed between J uly 8 and September 27, 2019. S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A uthorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town A ttorney, with G.A . Western Construction Company to complete the K innikinnick Road Bridge Repair project in the amount not to exceed $330,350.00. AT TAC H ME N TS: Description memo June 18, 2019 - Page 27 of 404 To: Town Council From: Public Works Date: 06/18/2019 Subject: Kinnikinnick Road Bridge Repair Project I. ITEM/TOPIC Kinnikinnick Road Bridge Repair Contract Award II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement with G.A. Western Construction Company to complete the Kinnikinnick Road Bridge Repair project. III. BACKGROUND Town staff received two bids for the Kinnikinnick Road Bridge Repair project, with G.A. Western Construction Company the low responsible bidder. The project includes replacing the existing bridge deck, new approach and bridge rails. The project will require a full bridge closure over Gore Creek and traffic will be detoured to the east Kinnikinnick Road intersection with the South Frontage Road. The project is within budget. The project is scheduled to be completed between July 8 and September 27, 2019. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with G.A. Western Construction Company to complete the Kinnikinnick Road Bridge Repair project in the amount not to exceed $330,350.00. June 18, 2019 - Page 28 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Ground E ngineering Bridge Road A greement AC T IO N RE Q UE S T E D O F C O UNC I L: A uthorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement with Ground E ngineering for construction inspection on the B ridge Road B ridge Replacement Project. B AC K G RO UND: S taff received 1 submittal for the request for proposals to provide construction inspection on the B ridge Road B ridge Replacement Project. T his project is partially funded with a $1,000,000.00 bridge replacement grant from the Colorado Department of Transportation for the design and construction of the B ridge Road B ridge Replacement. S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A uthorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town A ttorney, with Ground E ngineering to complete construction inspection on the Bridge Road Bridge Replacement P roject in the amount not to exceed $81,000.00. AT TAC H ME N TS: Description memo June 18, 2019 - Page 29 of 404 To: Town Council From: Public Works Date: 06/18/2019 Subject: Ground Engineering Bridge Road Agreement I. ITEM/TOPIC Ground Engineering Bridge Road Agreement II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement with Ground Engineering for construction inspection on the Bridge Road Bridge Replacement Project. III. BACKGROUND Staff received 1 submittal for the request for proposals to provide construction inspection on the Bridge Road Bridge Replacement Project. This project is partially funded with a $1,000,000.00 bridge replacement grant from the Colorado Department of Transportation for the design and construction of the Bridge Road Bridge Replacement. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Ground Engineering to complete the construction inspection on the Bridge Road Bridge Replacement Project in the amount not to exceed $81,000.00. June 18, 2019 - Page 30 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Buffehr Creek Road Quality I mprovements Contract Award B AC K G RO UND: Town staff received three bids for the B uffehr Creek Road Water Quality I mprovements project, with I con, I nc. the low responsible bidder. The uphill ditch along Buffehr Creek Road above 1701 Buffehr Creek Rd has significant scour due to the steep grade of the roadway. This scour discharges the sediment directly into B uffer Creek. To prevent this sediment from entering Buffehr Creek the project includes installing 1,000 feet of curb and gutter to prevent ditch erosion and 3 inlets with deep sumps to trap sediment. T he project is within the engineer’s estimate. S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A uthorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town A ttorney, with I con, I nc. to complete the B uffehr Creek Road Water Quality I mprovements project in the amount not to exceed $125,000.00. AT TAC H ME N TS: Description memo June 18, 2019 - Page 31 of 404 To: Town Council From: Public Works Date: 06/18/2019 Subject: Buffehr Creek Road Water Quality Improvements Contract Award I. ITEM/TOPIC Buffehr Creek Road Quality Improvements Contract Award II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement with Icon, Inc. to complete the Buffehr Creek Road Water Quality Improvements project. III. BACKGROUND Town staff received three bids for the Buffehr Creek Road Water Quality Improvements project, with Icon, Inc. the low responsible bidder. The uphill ditch along Buffehr Creek Road above 1701 Buffehr Creek Rd has significant scour due to the steep grade of the roadway. This scour discharges the sediment directly into Buffer Creek. To prevent this sediment from entering Buffehr Creek the project includes installing 1,000 feet of curb and gutter to prevent ditch erosion and 3 inlets with deep sumps to trap sediment. The project is within the engineer’s estimate. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Town Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the Town Attorney, with Icon, Inc. to complete the Buffehr Creek Road Water Quality Improvements project in the amount not to exceed $125,000.00. June 18, 2019 - Page 32 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Town Manager Recruitment Update P RE S E NT E R(S ): K rista Miller, HR & Risk Management Director AT TAC H ME N TS: Description Town Manager Recruitment Update June 18, 2019 - Page 33 of 404 TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Krista Miller, Human Resources/Risk Mgmt Director DATE: June 18, 2019 SUBJECT: Town Manager Recruitment & Selection Update I. PURPOSE This memo provides a status update and proposed schedule for the recruitment and selection to fill Vail’s Town Manager vacancy. II. UPDATE A final draft of the position profile is in the works and will be distributed soon. The proposed schedule for the interview process after considering all the Council schedule submissions. Proposed Vail, CO Town Manager Recruitment Timeline - Key Dates Position profile brochure is finalized 6/13/2019 Job Posted/Ads Placed 6/14/2019 Deadline for first review of Applications 7/23/2019 SGR meets with Town Council to review Applicant pool / selection of Semifinalists 7/31/2019 SGR meets with Town Council to review Semifinalists and facilitate selection of Finalists 8/19 or 20/2019 On-Site Interview Start Date* September 16 to 17, 2019 *Non-Local Candidates arrive afternoon/evening preceding 1st day of interviews III. NEXT STEPS Outreach to potential candidates has already begun and formal advertisements for the position are being placed. Members of the Town Council are encouraged to reach out to Doug with additional questions. June 18, 2019 - Page 34 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Verbal Update on New Development P lan for Booth Heights P RE S E NT E R(S ): Matt Gennett, Director of Community Development June 18, 2019 - Page 35 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Civic Area Plan Update – Presentation of F our Master Plan Concepts, Rough Costs and Revenue P otential P RE S E NT E R(S ): Matt Gennett, Community Development Director AC T IO N RE Q UE S T E D O F C O UNC I L: Staff asks Council to review the presentation and provide direction related to narrowing the four master plan concepts to two. B AC K G RO UND: The purpose of this work session is to share the four master plan concepts ideas with the Town Council and receive direction from Council to narrow the number of concepts to two. The project team will then share the design concepts through E ngage Vail as well as “pop- up” outreach events and stakeholder focus groups. S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: No recommendation at this time. AT TAC H ME N TS: Description Staff Memorandum Civic Area Presentation June 18, 2019 - Page 36 of 404 To: Vail Town Council From: Matt Gennett, Community Development Director Date: June 18, 2019 Subject: Civic Area Plan Update – Presentation of Four Master Plan Concepts and Rough Costs I. INTRODUCTION As discussed during the last update to Council on May 21, 2019, this presentation will focus on four master plan concepts that explore various uses in different configurations on the five civic sites in the study area, and rough order of magnitude costs associated with each concept. II. SUMMARY The purpose of this work session is to share the four master plan concepts ideas with the Town Council and receive direction from Council to narrow the number of concepts to two. The project team will then share the design concepts through Engage Vail as well as “pop-up” outreach events and stakeholder focus groups. The Town Council will eventually select a preferred concept in July, which will be incorporated into a draft master plan for refinement and adoption later in the year. ACTION REQUESTED BY COUNCIL Staff asks Council to review the presentation and provide direction related to narrowing the four master plan concepts to two. Attachment: Attachment A: Slide Presentation June 18, 2019 - Page 37 of 404 Town of Vail Civic Area Plan Town Council Update #5 June 18, 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 38 of 404 Today’s Agenda Examples of multi-use facilities Four possible master plan concepts Potential revenues and funding packages Discussion of Concepts Tom Braun Braun Associates, Inc. Lou Bieker 4240 Tim Morzel EPS June 18, 2019 - Page 39 of 404 Project Timeline June 18, 2019 - Page 40 of 404 Upcoming Meetings June 18 •Examples of mulit-use facilities •Master plan concepts •Revenue/funding possibilities July 16 •Guiding Principles •Update on market and cost info •Present refined Master Plan Concepts •Goal –narrow discussion of what the MP could be Aug 6th •Present preferred concept •High level MP concepts Formal Review Process June 18, 2019 - Page 41 of 404 Begin to narrow the discussion of what the Civic Area Plan can be Goal of Meeting June 18, 2019 - Page 42 of 404 Examples of multi-use facilities June 18, 2019 - Page 43 of 404 Multi-use Facilities About multi-use facilities Examples of multi-use facilities June 18, 2019 - Page 44 of 404 Multi-use Facilities/Jackson Center for the Arts June 18, 2019 - Page 45 of 404 Multi-use Facilities/Dairy Center June 18, 2019 - Page 46 of 404 Multi-use Facilities/SwissTech Convention Center June 18, 2019 - Page 47 of 404 Multi-use Facilities/SwissTech Convention Center June 18, 2019 - Page 48 of 404 Multi-use Facilities/Tobin Center for Performing Arts June 18, 2019 - Page 49 of 404 Multi-use Facilities/Tobin Center for Performing Arts June 18, 2019 - Page 50 of 404 Multi-use Facilities/Smith Center June 18, 2019 - Page 51 of 404 Four Master Plan concepts June 18, 2019 - Page 52 of 404 Four Master Plan Concepts Purpose of this effort How and why concepts were defined Limitations of work June 18, 2019 - Page 53 of 404 Four Master Plan Concepts Information to be presented: •The “big idea” •The uses and improvements •The Opportunities •The Constraints June 18, 2019 - Page 54 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 55 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 56 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 57 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 58 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 59 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 60 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 61 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 62 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 63 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 64 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 65 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 66 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 67 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 68 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 69 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 70 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 June 18, 2019 - Page 71 of 404 Master Plan Concept #1 Questions, comments, thoughts . . . . June 18, 2019 - Page 72 of 404 Master Plan Concept #2 June 18, 2019 - Page 73 of 404 Master Plan Concept #2 June 18, 2019 - Page 74 of 404 Master Plan Concept #2 June 18, 2019 - Page 75 of 404 Master Plan Concept #2 June 18, 2019 - Page 76 of 404 Master Plan Concept #2 June 18, 2019 - Page 77 of 404 Master Plan Concept #2 Questions, comments, thoughts . . . . June 18, 2019 - Page 78 of 404 Master Plan Concept #3 June 18, 2019 - Page 79 of 404 Master Plan Concept #3 June 18, 2019 - Page 80 of 404 Master Plan Concept #3 June 18, 2019 - Page 81 of 404 Master Plan Concept #3 June 18, 2019 - Page 82 of 404 Master Plan Concept #3 June 18, 2019 - Page 83 of 404 Master Plan Concept #3 Questions, comments, thoughts . . . . June 18, 2019 - Page 84 of 404 Master Plan Concept #4 June 18, 2019 - Page 85 of 404 Master Plan Concept #4 June 18, 2019 - Page 86 of 404 Master Plan Concept #4 June 18, 2019 - Page 87 of 404 Master Plan Concept #4 June 18, 2019 - Page 88 of 404 Master Plan Concept #4 June 18, 2019 - Page 89 of 404 Master Plan Concept #4 questions, comments, thoughts . . . . June 18, 2019 - Page 90 of 404 Potential revenues and funding packages June 18, 2019 - Page 91 of 404 Public Financing Mechanisms Description Acronym Urban Renewal Authority URA Downtown Development Authority DDA Business Improvement District BID General Improvement District GID Metro District (Special District)Title 32 Public Improvement Fee PIF Dedicated Sales Tax N/A Land Lease / Land Sale N/A Current Town Reserve N/A Joint Venture Terms JV Philanthropy Philanthropy Certificate of Participation COPs June 18, 2019 - Page 92 of 404 Public Financing Mechanisms Amount of Ease of Revenue Potential Description Acronym Proceeds Adoption Low High Urban Renewal Authority URA High High $35.0M $35.0M Downtown Development Authority DDA High Medium $13.1M $30.5M Business Improvement District BID Low Low N/A N/A General Improvement District GID Low Medium $1.9M $3.7M Metro District (Special District)Title 32 Medium Medium N/A N/A Public Improvement Fee PIF Low Medium $16.3M $24.5M Dedicated Sales Tax N/A High Low $19.6M $39.1M Dedicated Lodging Tax N/A High Low $27.2M $40.9M Land Lease / Land Sale N/A Medium High $23.1M $34.7M Current Town Reserve N/A Medium High $10.0M $10.0M Joint Venture Terms JV Medium Medium N/A N/A Philanthropy Philanthropy High High N/A N/A Certificate of Participation COPs High High $46.2M $57.8M June 18, 2019 - Page 93 of 404 Concept #1 Order of Magnitude Costs •South Frontage Road*$12 •Police Department $20 •Charter bus lot $55 (Town hall, performing arts, parking, plaza) •Dobson Rebuild $48 •Library $8 •LH Structure wrap *$6 $149,000,000 June 18, 2019 - Page 94 of 404 Concept #1 Opportunities •Utilizes value of private development to generate revenues through DDA and land lease revenues •Includes mix of civic and private uses and revenues to activate civic area Constraints •Requires investment from the town in the form of a bond Total Cost $149.0M Potential Revenues: Option 1 DDA $35.2M URA $35.0M Land Lease $15.8M Town Set-Aside ($5M/yr. for 30 yrs.)$57.8M Town Reserves ($10M avail.)$5.2M Total Revenues $149.0M Funding Gap No Gap June 18, 2019 - Page 95 of 404 Concept #2 Order of Magnitude Costs •Charter bus lot $105 (Town hall and police, ice, parking, plaza) •Dobson Rebuild $48 •Library $8 •LH Structure wrap *$6 $167,000,000 June 18, 2019 - Page 96 of 404 Concept #2 Opportunities •Utilizes a range of public and private funding sources Constraints •Requires investment from the town in the form a bond •Requires a dedicated sales tax in order to close the gap •Role of philanthropy should be considered Total Cost $167.0M Potential Revenues: Option 1 DDA $33.5M URA $35.0M Land Lease $12.5M Town Set-Aside ($5M/yr. for 30 yrs.)$57.8M Town Reserves ($10M avail.)$10.0M Total Revenues $148.8M Funding Gap -$18.2M Potential Revenues: Option 2 DDA $33.5M URA $35.0M Land Lease $12.5M Dedicated Sales Tax (0.25%)$19.6M Town Set-Aside ($5M/yr. for 30 yrs.)$57.8M Town Reserves ($10M avail.)$8.6M Total $167.0M Gap No Gap June 18, 2019 - Page 97 of 404 Concept #3 Order of Magnitude Costs •Town hall $33 •Charter bus lot $76 (multi-use center, performing arts, parking, plaza) •Dobson Rebuild $35 •Library $8 •LH Structure wrap *$6 $158,000,000 June 18, 2019 - Page 98 of 404 Concept #3 Opportunities •Maximizes focus on civic uses in the planning area Constraints •Includes a minimal amount of private development and corresponding revenue •Requires investment from the Town in the form a bond •Reduced ability to form a DDA •Requires dedicated sales tax •Requires dedicated lodging tax Total Cost $158.0M Potential Revenues: Option 1 URA $35.0M Land Lease (1/3rd of the muni site)$6.1M Town Set-Aside ($5M/yr. for 30 yrs.)$57.8M Town Reserves ($10M avail.)$10.0M Dedicated Sales Tax (0.25%)$19.6M Dedicated Lodging Tax (1.0%)$27.2M Total Revenues $155.7M Funding Gap -$2.3M June 18, 2019 - Page 99 of 404 Concept #4 Order of Magnitude Costs •South Frontage Road*$12 •Town hall and police $53 •Dobson Rebuild $48 •Library $8 •LH Structure wrap *$6 $127,000,000 June 18, 2019 - Page 100 of 404 Concept #4 Opportunities •Requires the lowest level of public investment due to significant revenues generated by private development •With a dedicated sales tax, this idea does not require a town set-aside or any dedication of current reserves Constraints •Considerable use of public land for private development •Dependent on significant private sector involvement in order to redevelop sites within the area and generate revenues to fund civic improvements Total Cost $127.0M Option 1 DDA $42.1M URA $35.0M Land Lease (muni site and charter bus lot)$29.8M Town Set-Aside ($1.7M/yr. for 30 yrs.)$20.1M Town Reserves ($10M avail.)$0.0M Total Revenues $127.0M Funding Gap No Gap Option 2 DDA $42.1M URA $35.0M Land Lease $29.8M Dedicated Sales Tax (0.25%)$19.6M Total Revenues $126.5M Funding Gap $0.5M June 18, 2019 - Page 101 of 404 Potential Funding Packages Questions, comments, thoughts . . . . June 18, 2019 - Page 102 of 404 Discussion What is your vision for the Civic Area? How do these concepts resonate with you? Specific elements from Concepts June 18, 2019 - Page 103 of 404 Discussion Re-location of South Frontage Road June 18, 2019 - Page 104 of 404 Discussion Connectivity and outdoor spaces June 18, 2019 - Page 105 of 404 Discussion Library expansion June 18, 2019 - Page 106 of 404 Discussion LH Structure “wrap” June 18, 2019 - Page 107 of 404 Discussion Conference center/ P3 or Town facility June 18, 2019 - Page 108 of 404 Discussion Dobson/2nd sheet of ice June 18, 2019 - Page 109 of 404 Discussion Performing arts/ community building June 18, 2019 - Page 110 of 404 Next Steps Town Council/July 16th •Guiding Principles •Update on market and cost info •Civil/traffic/environmental updates •Present refined Master Plan Concepts •Goal –narrow discussion of what the MP could be June 18, 2019 - Page 111 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Presentation of the 2019 Vail Community Housing S urvey Results P RE S E NT E R(S ): George Ruther, Housing Director, David F laherty, Magellan Strategies, David Cunningham, S ummit I nformation Services AC T IO N RE Q UE S T E D O F C O UNC I L: L isten to the presentation and schedule a future discussion of possible next steps B AC K G RO UND: The Vail L ocal Housing A uthority, acting in partnership with the Vail Town Council, contracted the consulting services of Summit I nformation S ystems and Magellan S trategies to conduct a Vail Community Housing Survey. The purpose of the survey was two-fold: 1) to measure and understand the general opinions of the Vail community regarding the availability of housing and awareness of ongoing town policies and programs to address the housing need, and 2) to measure general support for a potential tax initiative to establish a permanent and consistent funding source for town-sponsored housing programs. S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: Please refer to the memorandum dated J une 18, 2019 for the recommendation from town staff. AT TAC H ME N TS: Description Vail Community Survey Results Presentation 06182019 Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Presentation 061019 Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary 061019 Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Verbatim Response 060519 - T4 Solution to Housing Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Verbatim Response 060519 - T9 Definition Deed Restriction Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Verbatim Response 060519 - T11 Agree Local Govt Reasonable Effort Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Verbatim Response 060519 - T12 Disagree Local Govt Reasonable Effort Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Verbatim Response 060519 - T19 Sales Tax Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Verbatim Response 060519 - T20 Property Tax Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Verbatim Response 060519 - T23 Other Suggestions June 18, 2019 - Page 112 of 404 To: Vail Town Council Vail Local Housing Authority From: George Ruther, Housing Director Date: June 18, 2019 Subject: Vail Community Housing Survey Results 1. SUMMARY The purpose of this agenda item is to present the results of the 2019 Vail Community Housing Survey and discuss possible next steps the Vail Town Council and Vail Local Housing Authority may wish to take in response to the survey results. 2. BACKGROUND The Vail Local Housing Authority, acting in partnership with the Vail Town Council, contracted the consulting services of Summit Information Systems and Magellan Strategies to conduct a Vail Community Housing Survey. The purpose of the survey was two-fold: 1) to measure and understand the general opinions of the Vail community regarding the availability of housing and awareness of ongoing town policies and programs to address the housing need, and 2) to measure general support for a potential tax initiative to establish a permanent and consistent funding source for town-sponsored housing programs. Community participation in the housing survey was strong with more than 400 registered Vail voters taking part. The survey was conducted both online and by telephone from May 22 through June 5, 2019. The cost of the survey was funded by the Vail Local Housing Authority. A summary of the survey results has been attached for reference. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS Town staff is recommending the Vail Town Council and Vail Local Housing Authority members listen to the presentation of the survey results and engage in a future discussion regarding possible next steps that may be taken in response to the community input received. There are a number of actionable steps the Town Council and the Authority may wish to consider when addressing the need for housing in the Vail community. These steps could be discussed and considered in the context of the 2020 Town of Vail Budget. A future discussion will be scheduled at the direction of the Vail Town Council. June 18, 2019 - Page 113 of 404 Town of Vail Page 2 June 18, 2019 - Page 114 of 404 VAIL LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY SURVEY May 22nd –June 5th, 2019 1 June 18, 2019 - Page 115 of 404 Methodology Ø Magellan Strategies are pleased to present the results for a 400n live and online survey of registered voters in Vail, Colorado. Ø The online interviews were conducted from May 22nd –June 5th, 2019. The phone interviews were conducted from June 3rd –5th, 2019. Ø The overall survey has a margin of error of +/-4.61% at the 95% confidence interval. Subgroups of voters will have higher margin of error than the overall population. Ø The survey results were weighted based upon past off-year voter turnout demographics for a general election in Vail, Colorado. Ø David Flaherty was the principal researcher on this project, and Courtney Sievers was the project director. 2Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 116 of 404 Survey Demographics 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 12%12% 16%20% 35% 27% 31% 30% 2% Republican Democrat Unaffiliated Other 3 51%49% Male Female Own Rent Refused 77% 21%2% Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 117 of 404 KEY FINDINGS 4 June 18, 2019 - Page 118 of 404 Key Findings: Ø A majority of respondents, 51%, think the lack of available and affordable homes in the Town of Vail is a big problem and 32% say it is somewhat of a problem. Among voters aged 44 and younger, 76% think the lack of affordable homes is a big problem compared to seniors, aged 65 and older, with only 29% thinking it is big problem. Ø Seventy-five percent of Vail voters agree, and 46% strongly agree with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities like the Town of Vail should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available resident-occupied, deed-restricted homes for residents. Ø Fifty-two percent of respondents approve of the actions the Town of Vail is taking to provide and secure available homes for residents and 36% disapprove of them. Thirty-nine percent of respondents have a favorable opinion of the Vail Local Housing Authority, 34% have an unfavorable opinion, and 21% have heard of the Vail Local Housing Authority but do not have an opinion of it. 5Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 119 of 404 Key Findings: ØThere is little voter support for a possible sales or property tax increase to fund the town’s mission of maintaining and increasing the supply of resident-occupied deed restricted homes. Among all respondents, only 28% said they would be willing to support an unspecified sales or property tax increase and 51% of voters would not be willing to support a tax increase. ØNinety-four percent of respondents are aware the Town of Vail sponsored and developed the Chamonix Vail Neighborhood and 51% were aware the town purchased deed-restrictions at 6 West Apartments in Edwards. Voter familiarity with the “Vail InDEED” program was relatively strong, with 25% being very familiar with the program and 34% somewhat familiar. 6Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 120 of 404 Key Findings: ØMany voters blame the growth and adoption of Airbnb and VRBO for the lack of housing for full-time residents. They think the long-term rental market has decreased significantly and short-term rentals have increased due to 2nd home owners using these services. Because of this, some voters suggest putting a limit on the total number of short-term rentals or applying a hotel tax to short-term rentals. ØMany voters think Vail employers both big and small need to pay their employees more, so they can afford housing. Others believe employers should be more accountable for finding housing for their employees instead of the Town of Vail taking the lead in addressing the housing problem. ØSome voters have an unfavorable opinion of deed-restricted housing because they think deed-restricted homes lower the property value of non-deed restricted homes within the same area. 7Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 121 of 404 OPINION OF AVAILABLE HOMES IN TOWN OF VAIL 8 June 18, 2019 - Page 122 of 404 How much of a problem is the lack of the availability of homes, including townhomes, condominiums, and apartments for residents in the Town of Vail? Would you say the lack of available of homes is a… 9Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 51% 32% 12%4% 1% BIG PROBLEM SOMEWHAT OF A PROBLEM NOT TOO MUCH OF A PROBLEM NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL DON'T KNOW REFUSED 48%55% 30%33% 14%9%7%2%1%1% MEN WOMEN 43% 60%51% 38% 23% 38% 9%11%10%10%3%2%3% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 123 of 404 How much of a problem is the lack of the availability of homes, including townhomes, condominiums, and apartments for residents in the Town of Vail? Would you say the lack of available of homes is a… 51%32% 12%4%1% BIG PROBLEM SOMEWHAT OF A PROBLEM NOT TOO MUCH OF A PROBLEM NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL DON'T KNOW REFUSED 10Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 82%70%66%54% 29%16%14%24%32%44% 6%8%10%19%8%2%4%6%2%2%2% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 124 of 404 VOTER OPINION OF WHAT TOWN OF VAIL SHOULD DO TO ADDRESS HOUSING PROBLEM 11 June 18, 2019 - Page 125 of 404 12 Top Issues Work with Local Business Limit/Tax Short Term Rentals Only Build Long-Term Locals Affordable for Workers “Many similar towns limit the percentage of home that can be [a] short-term rental, (Airbnb, VRBO), The percentage available to workers should be equal to those for short-term rental.” -Female, 55-64 “Work with local business and development companies to increase the availability of employee housing, throughout the county and not just down valley. Housing needs to increase close to Vail Village.” -Male, 65+ “Only allow home sales if it is a primary residence. There are far too many homes that sit empty for 50 weeks a year. You want to come here for only two weeks a year, rent a hotel room like everyone else.” -Male, 35-44 Regardless if you agree or disagree with the view that the availability of homes for Vail residents is a problem, in your own words please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents. “Work with Vail Resorts and local businesses to develop a plan for more employee/local housing in Vail and the Valley as a whole.” -Female, 45-54, “Tax second home owners with a certain amount of square footage, require them to build or pay for employee units depending on how much jobs and work that would generate. “ -Female, 45-54 “Outlaw short-term rentals. At the very least, the town should charge hotel tax to all short-term rentals. The town should also increase the property tax rate on 2nd home owners and decrease the property tax rate on primary home owners.” -Male, 35-44 “Market forces have always driven this problem. More supply is not always the right answer but perhaps subsidies that allow locals to buy is one way.” -Male, 55-64 Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 126 of 404 VAIL LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY IMAGE RATING 13 June 18, 2019 - Page 127 of 404 Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the Vail Local Housing Authority? 14Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 Very Favorable 11% Somewhat Favorable 28% Very Unfavorable 20% Somewhat Unfavorable 14% 39% 34% 21%3% 3% TOTAL FAVORABLE TOTAL UNFAVORABLE HEARD OF, NO OPINION NEVER HEARD OF REFUSED 40%39%36%32% 19%23% 3%3%1%3% MEN WOMEN 41% 49% 35%32% 20% 41% 20%26%19% 2%3%3%5%1%1% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 128 of 404 Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the Vail Local Housing Authority? 39% 34% 21%3%3% TOTAL FAVORABLE TOTAL UNFAVORABLE HEARD OF, NO OPINION NEVER HEARD OF REFUSED 15Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 Very Favorable 11% Somewhat Favorable 28% Very Unfavorable 20% Somewhat Unfavorable 14% 26% 36%40%46%41% 22% 41% 29%32%36%36% 20%26% 18%18%15% 2%2%1%1%1%1%3%2%3% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 129 of 404 VOTER APPROVAL/DISAPPROVAL OF TOWN ACTIONS TO SECURE HOUSING 16 June 18, 2019 - Page 130 of 404 Do you approve or disapprove of the actions the Town of Vail is taking to provide and secure available homes for residents? 17Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 Strongly Approve 15% Somewhat Approve 37% Strongly Disapprove 19% Somewhat Disapprove 17% 52%36% 12% TOTAL APPROVE TOTAL DISAPPROVE UNSURE NO OPINION REFUSED 50%53% 36%36% 13%11% MEN WOMEN 61%53%52% 34%26% 39% 5% 20% 9%1% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 131 of 404 Do you approve or disapprove of the actions the Town of Vail is taking to provide and secure available homes for residents? 52%36% 12% TOTAL APPROVE TOTAL DISAPPROVE UNSURE NO OPINION REFUSED 18Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 Strongly Approve 15% Somewhat Approve 37% Strongly Disapprove 19% Somewhat Disapprove 17% 49%47%56%60% 50% 27% 42% 30%33%38% 24% 11%13%7%12%1% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 132 of 404 VOTER FAMILIARITY OF VAIL LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY’S MISSION 19 June 18, 2019 - Page 133 of 404 How familiar would you say you are with the mission of the Vail Local Housing Authority? Would you say you are… 20Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 29% 43% 18% 10% VERY FAMILIAR SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR NOT TOO FAMILIAR NOT FAMILIAR AT ALL REFUSED 36% 21% 36% 51% 19%17%10%12% MEN WOMEN 31% 21% 34% 42%42%42% 15% 23% 17% 13%13%8% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 134 of 404 How familiar would you say you are with the mission of the Vail Local Housing Authority? Would you say you are… 29% 43% 18%10% VERY FAMILIAR SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR NOT TOO FAMILIAR NOT FAMILIAR AT ALL REFUSED 21Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 8% 29% 16% 42% 33%39% 47%53% 33% 42% 22%18%20%18%17% 31% 6%12%7%8% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 135 of 404 VOTER FAMILIARITY WITH TOWN OF VAIL’S HOUSING MISSION 22 June 18, 2019 - Page 136 of 404 How familiar would you say you are with the Town of Vail’s mission of providing and securing homes for residents? Would you say you are… 23Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 34% 43% 14%9% VERY FAMILIAR SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR NOT TOO FAMILIAR NOT FAMILIAR AT ALL REFUSED 37%31% 40%46% 12%16%10%7%1% MEN WOMEN 31%28% 40%42%43%44% 16%17%12%10%12% 5%1% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 137 of 404 How familiar would you say you are with the Town of Vail’s mission of providing and securing homes for residents? Would you say you are… 34% 43% 14%9% VERY FAMILIAR SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR NOT TOO FAMILIAR NOT FAMILIAR AT ALL REFUSED 24Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 14% 32%23% 48% 37%33% 51%53% 34% 44% 33% 13%17%13%9% 20% 5%5%6%10%2% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 138 of 404 VOTER OPINION OF WHAT A DEED RESTRICTED HOME IS 25 June 18, 2019 - Page 139 of 404 26 Top Issues Accurate Understanding Owners Being Limited with the Property “It is a home that is only allowed to be appreciated by a controlled small amount each year.” -Female, 65+ “A home to be purchased at a lower sales cost or with incentives (like down payment assistance) that can then only be sold with a certain percentage profit and maybe only to a full-time resident.” -Male, 18-34 “It is housing that can only be sold or leased to a full time Eagle County employee and may include limits on yearly appreciation.” -Female, 65+ In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed- restricted” home is. “A home that can be on the free market but isn’t because it has been “deed-restricted” in order to temper the price and keep it as “affordable” as it can be for those living and working in the Town of Vail.” -Male, 35-44 “The community does not allow the property owner to do anything they want with it or rent to whomever they want.” -Female, 45-54 Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 140 of 404 Town of Vail Efforts to Maintain Deed Restricted Homes As you may know, a resident-occupied, deed- restricted home limits the occupancy of the residence to a number of people that make the home their primary residence and are employed a minimum of 30 hours per week on an annual basis at a business located within Eagle County. Understanding what a deed-restricted home is, do you agree or disagree with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities like the Town of Vail should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available resident-occupied, deed-restricted homes for residents? 27Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 141 of 404 Understanding what a deed-restricted home is, do you agree or disagree with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities like the Town of Vail should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available resident- occupied, deed-restricted homes for residents? 28Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 75% 23%2% TOTAL AGREE TOTAL DISAGREE UNSURE NO OPINION REFUSED Strongly Agree 46% Somewhat Agree 29% Strongly Disagree 10% Somewhat Disagree 13% June 18, 2019 - Page 142 of 404 29 Top Issues Concern and Sympathy for Workforce Fundamental Requirement Need for Better Pay –Higher Wages “It’s hard to find good employees. Creating more housing allows for our growing town to help employ our businesses.” -Female, 35-44 “The town and community are built around our mountain. The town and resort have a duty to help people that work hard to keep everything moving. How can we not help those people? Hard workers are being forced down valley because the wages cannot support living in this town.” -Male, 18-34 “Because otherwise there won’t be anyone living here who also works in their community. The town will suffer for it if it becomes untenable to raise a family here.” -Female, 18-34 In your own words being as descriptive as possible, please tell me why you agree with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents. “It is hard to find affordable housing for typical residents of that area. The fact that they offer deed-restricted housing for people in that area who aren’t millionaires is important.” -Female, 35-44 “We need workers in jobs that do not necessarily pay well. Vail is an expensive community. Deed-restricted housing would help to reduce our problems in this regard.“ -Male, 65+ “Without affordable housing we will not have employees to keep our businesses running. We strive for a high level of customer service in Vail as we are a first- class resort. Without deed restricted homes the second homeowners will purchase all available and affordable options.” -Female, 55-64 “Too much of our housing is second homes owned by non- residents who rent at inflated levels.” -Male, 65+ Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 143 of 404 30 Top Issues Local Employers Should Pay More Deed-Restricted Housing Reduces Property Values Responsibility of Local Business “Vail Health and Vail Resorts should be paying the bulk of the cost of providing more deed-restricted housing. The Town of Vail can be a partner but should not should majority of the financial burden.” -Female, 55-64 “The town of Vail should not be engaging it’s municipality in buying and selling real estate. It should be done by professional real estate people and developers. It is in conflict with their fiduciary duty to the citizens.” -Male, 65+ “Deed-restricted properties are impacting the value of other units in complexes that often end up staying on the market much longer, again impacting the sales of non-deed restricted properties. Given deed-restricted properties can still be quite pricey, for example over $600K for a 2-3BR in Vail, this price point is still very difficult for a new home buyer or lower economic bracket which keeps it on the market longer and is not serving the purpose it was meant to serve but does end up hurting the non-deed restricted properties.” -Female, 45-54 In your own words being as descriptive as possible, please tell me why you disagree with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents. “Deed-restriction robs the owner of the opportunity to gain property value. Being stuck in a lower valued property would decrease incentive to maintain the property. As years pass the deed restricted homes will look out of place and potentially bring the town down.“ -Female, 45-54 “Because the town then ramrods these projects into neighborhoods where they may not be suitable; size or density-wise. It is time for private business to pay a living wage for their circumstances. Or, at least assist their employees with transportation.” -Male, 65+ Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 144 of 404 VOTER FAMILIARITY WITH THE VAIL INDEED HOUSING PROGRAM 31 June 18, 2019 - Page 145 of 404 32Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 How familiar are you with “Vail InDEED”, the deed-restriction purchase program that is managed by the Vail Local Housing Authority? Would you say you are… 25% 34% 22% 19% VERY FAMILIAR SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR NOT TOO FAMILIAR NOT FAMILIAR AT ALL REFUSED 30% 20% 30% 38% 20%23%19%19% MEN WOMEN 18%25% 34%43% 26%30% 15% 28% 21%24%21%15% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 146 of 404 How familiar are you with “Vail InDEED”, the deed-restriction purchase program that is managed by the Vail Local Housing Authority? Would you say you are… 25% 34% 22% 19% VERY FAMILIAR SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR NOT TOO FAMILIAR NOT FAMILIAR AT ALL REFUSED 33Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 10% 34%29%30% 22% 33%30%34%35%34% 25% 15% 25% 18% 25% 32% 21% 12%16%19% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 147 of 404 VOTER AWARENESS OF TOWN’S INVOLVEMENT WITH CHAMONIX AND 6 WEST APARTMENTS 34 June 18, 2019 - Page 148 of 404 Are you aware the Town of Vail sponsored and developed the deed-restricted community Chamonix Vail Neighborhood? 35Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 94% 6% YES NO REFUSED June 18, 2019 - Page 149 of 404 36Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 Are you aware the Town of Vail purchased deed- restrictions at the 6 West Apartments in Edwards that grants leasing preference to people employed in the Town of Vail? 51%49% YES NO REFUSED 54%48%46%52% MEN WOMEN 44%46% 60%56%54% 39% 1% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 150 of 404 Are you aware the Town of Vail purchased deed- restrictions at the 6 West Apartments in Edwards that grants leasing preference to people employed in the Town of Vail? 51%49% YES NO REFUSED 37Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 57%50%60% 48%47%43%50%40% 51%53% 1% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 151 of 404 VOTER OPINION OF VAIL LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY’S MISSION 38 June 18, 2019 - Page 152 of 404 Opinion of Vail Local Housing Authority Mission The mission of the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority is to maintain and increase the supply of resident-occupied, deed- restricted homes for residents through the acquisition of deed restrictions. They do this with the goal of maintaining and sustaining community in Vail. To advance their mission, they apply an “all of the above” approach to identifying, acquiring and building future deed-restricted homes. This is done by researching and pursuing public-private partnerships, strategic initiatives, innovative programs and collaboration within the community. Recent examples of approaches taken to achieve their mission include Chamonix Vail Neighborhood, Vail InDEEd and 6 West Apartments. Understanding their mission, do you think the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority is headed in the right direction in working towards their mission or do you feel they are off on the wrong track? 39Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 153 of 404 40Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 Understanding their mission, do you think the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority is headed in the right direction in working towards their mission or do you feel they are off on the wrong track? 53%31% 16% RIGHT DIRECTION WRONG TRACK UNSURE NO OPINION REFUSED 52%54% 31%30% 16%15%1% MEN WOMEN 56%64% 47% 32%23%30% 10%13%22% 1% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 154 of 404 Understanding their mission, do you think the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority is headed in the right direction in working towards their mission or do you feel they are off on the wrong track? 53%31% 16% RIGHT DIRECTION WRONG TRACK UNSURE NO OPINION REFUSED 41Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 70% 55%57%62% 43% 16% 29%22%24% 40% 13%14%20%14%17%1%2%1% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 155 of 404 VOTER OPINION SUPPORT OF TAX INCREASE FOR VAIL LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY 42 June 18, 2019 - Page 156 of 404 Voter Opinion of Tax Increases to Fund Vail Local Housing Authority The Vail Local Housing Authority, working at the direction of the Vail Town Council, is just beginning to have discussions with the community to listen, learn and understand what voters think of a possible sales or property tax increase to fund the housing authority’s mission. Knowing this, are you willing to support a sales or property tax increase to fund the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission of maintaining and increasing the supply of resident-occupied, deed-restricted homes for residents? 43Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 157 of 404 44Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 Knowing this, are you willing to support a sales or property tax increase to fund the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission of maintaining and increasing the supply of resident-occupied, deed- restricted homes for residents? 28% 51% 20%1% YES NO UNSURE REFUSED 28%28% 56% 46% 16%25% 1% MEN WOMEN 17% 41% 30% 68% 34% 48% 15%25%21%2% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 158 of 404 Knowing this, are you willing to support a sales or property tax increase to fund the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission of maintaining and increasing the supply of resident-occupied, deed- restricted homes for residents? 28% 51% 20%1% YES NO UNSURE REFUSED 45Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 48%47% 33% 16%21%22%32%42% 55% 67% 29%20%24%26% 13%1%2% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 159 of 404 46Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 And would you prefer the tax to fund an increase in the supply of available homes for residents to be a sales tax or a property tax? (Asked only to 112 respondents that would consider a tax increase, MoE +/-9.1%) 53%38% 9% SALES TAX PROPERTY TAX UNSURE UNDECIDED REFUSED 62% 44% 30% 47% 8%9% MEN WOMEN 70%59% 44% 30%34%42% 7%13% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 160 of 404 And would you prefer the tax to fund an increase in the supply of available homes for residents to be a sales tax or a property tax? (Asked only to 112 respondents that would consider a tax increase, MoE +/- 9.1%) 53%38% 9% SALES TAX PROPERTY TAX UNSURE UNDECIDED REFUSED 47Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 37%40% 55% 73%65% 51%43%40% 18% 35% 12%16%4%10% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 161 of 404 48 “The increase in property taxes further burdens the local worker living in Vail which is already a strain for most financially. A sales tax puts that cost/burden more on the tourist than the local which seems more appropriate.” -Female, 65+ “A couple of reasons. 1. I think you may have a very difficult time getting people to vote in favor of a property tax, particularly in light of the newest round of assessments that just came out. 2. I think that it is important not only for our residents but also visitors to buy into the idea that housing is infrastructure.” -Female, 45-54 In your own words, please tell me why you would support a sales tax rather than a property tax. “The primary beneficiary of affordable housing is the tourism industry serving our visitors. These visitors should contribute to the expense of house the people serving them. It will be a smaller amount spread among more people.“ -Male, 45-54 “I think a sales tax would encourage our community to buy local, knowing where that extra tax is going. It would also allow us to benefit from Vail's tourism. Peoples vacations depend on the employees in Vail.” -Male, 18-34 “Sales tax will capture all the visitors who come to the valley, which is why everything is so expensive in this county.” -Female, 45-54 Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 Top Issues Takes Away the Burden of Just Property Owners Makes the Tourists Pay As Well June 18, 2019 - Page 162 of 404 49 Top Issues Tax Only Those with Second Homes Personal Preference “Leave the locals alone and tax the owners of empty, unrented homes. I support a property tax on homes that sit empty.” -Female, 45-54 “It's more reasonable to me.” -Female, 35-44 “Sales taxes are already very high. Property taxes bring income to the second homeowners.” -Female, 35-44 In your own words, please tell me why you would support a property tax rather than a sales tax. “A very large number of second homes exists in the area, especially Vail. The fact that those homes are vacant most of the time has contributed to the housing crisis we now face. As a homeowner, I'm willing to pay my share to help make Vail more sustainable for the long term.“ -Male, 45-54 “I believe part of the root of the problem is second and third homeowners who have relatively low property taxes and aren't in town enough to contribute to the sales tax base measurably. We already tax our visitors at a ratio that is high, this is designed in my opinion in part to keep property taxes low.. most areas have a higher property tax to sales tax ratio and I believe this is the best way to improve revenues in order to improve infrastructure and subsidize housing.” -Male, 35-44, Republican “Would tax commercial and second home owners. Could exempt full time residents employed in Eagle County.” -Female, 65+ Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 163 of 404 VOTER OPINION OF ONE MILL INCREASE TO FUND VAIL LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY 50 June 18, 2019 - Page 164 of 404 51Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 To better understand the cost of a property tax increase, a 1 mill increase on a residential property in the Town of Vail with a value of a $500,000 would cost a homeowner an additional $36 dollars per year. Knowing this information, are you more likely or less likely to support a property tax increase to fund the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission? 39% 46% 13%2% MORE LIKELY LESS LIKELY UNSURE NO OPINION REFUSED 33% 46%53% 38% 11%14%3%2% MEN WOMEN 29% 51%43% 58% 34%41% 11%16%11%2%4% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 165 of 404 To better understand the cost of a property tax increase, a 1 mill increase on a residential property in the Town of Vail with a value of a $500,000 would cost a homeowner an additional $36 dollars per year. Knowing this information, are you more likely or less likely to support a property tax increase to fund the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission? 39% 46% 13%2% MORE LIKELY LESS LIKELY UNSURE NO OPINION REFUSED 52Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 75% 49%43%40% 22%19%29%36%40% 67% 7%20%19%18%6%2%2%2%4% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 166 of 404 OPINION OF SALES TAX INCREASE TO FUND VAIL LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY 53 June 18, 2019 - Page 167 of 404 54Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 To better understand the cost of a sales tax increase to you as a consumer, the current local sales tax for purchases in the Town of Vail is 4.0%. The overall sales tax rate including state and county taxes is 8.4%. The cost of a 0.25% sales tax increase on a $100-dollar purchase is twenty-five cents. Knowing this information, are you more likely or less likely to support a sales tax increase to fund the Vail Town Council/Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission? 37% 47% 15%1% MORE LIKELY LESS LIKELY UNSURE NO OPINION REFUSED 38%37% 49%44% 13%16%1%2% MEN WOMEN 34% 45%38% 53% 36% 46% 12%17%13%1%2% REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT UNAFFILIATEDJune 18, 2019 - Page 168 of 404 To better understand the cost of a sales tax increase to you as a consumer, the current local sales tax for purchases in the Town of Vail is 4.0%. The overall sales tax rate including state and county taxes is 8.4%. The cost of a 0.25% sales tax increase on a $100-dollar purchase is twenty-five cents. Knowing this information, are you more likely or less likely to support a sales tax increase to fund the Vail Town Council/Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission? 37% 47% 15%1% MORE LIKELY LESS LIKELY UNSURE NO OPINION REFUSED 55Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey, 400n, +/-4.61%, May/June 2019 35% 47% 35%39%36% 47%40%39%39% 55% 18%11% 22%21% 8%1%4%1%1% 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+June 18, 2019 - Page 169 of 404 MAGELLAN STRATEGIES 303-861-8585 www.MagellanStrategies.com David Flaherty | Courtney Sievers Ryan Winger June 18, 2019 - Page 170 of 404 June 10th, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO: VAIL LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, INTERESTED PARTIES FR: DAVID FLAHERTY, COURTNEY SIEVERS, RYAN WINGER RE: TOWN OF VAIL LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY SURVEY This is a summary of an online and telephone survey of 400 registered voters in the Town of Vail, Colorado. The interviews were conducted from May 22nd to June 5th, 2019. The overall results have a margin of error of +/- 4.61% at the 95 percent confidence interval. The survey results were slightly weighted to reflect the voter turnout demographics for an odd-year election in the Town of Vail. Survey Overview The focus of this survey was to measure and understand general opinions of the Vail community regarding the availability of housing and awareness of ongoing town policies and programs to address this problem. The survey also measured general support and opposition levels for a possible local sales or property tax that would generate a permanent funding source for housing programs and policies. The survey findings reveal a community that genuinely wants to address the problem of affordable housing. There is no question in their commitment and willingness to work and support solutions to this difficult problem. However, there are many different opinions of which solutions would be best for the Vail workforce, residents and homeowners. Key Findings: Ø A majority of respondents, 51%, think the lack of available and affordable homes in the Town of Vail is a big problem and 32% say it is somewhat of a problem. Among voters aged 44 and younger, 76% think the lack of affordable homes is a big problem compared to seniors, aged 65 and older, with only 29% thinking it is big problem. Ø Seventy-five percent of Vail voters agree, and 46% strongly agree with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities like the Town of Vail should June 18, 2019 - Page 171 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 2 make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available resident- occupied, deed-restricted homes for residents. Ø Fifty-two percent of respondents approve of the actions the Town of Vail is taking to provide and secure available homes for residents and 36% disapprove of them. Thirty-nine percent of respondents have a favorable opinion of the Vail Local Housing Authority, 34% have an unfavorable opinion, and 21% have heard of the Vail Local Housing Authority but do not have an opinion of it. Ø There is little voter support for a possible sales or property tax increase to fund the town’s mission of maintaining and increasing the supply of resident-occupied deed restricted homes. Among all respondents, only 28% said they would be willing to support an unspecified sales or property tax increase and 51% of voters would not be willing to support a tax increase. Ø Ninety-four percent of respondents are aware the Town of Vail sponsored and developed the Chamonix Vail Neighborhood and 51% were aware the town purchased deed-restrictions at 6 West Apartments in Edwards. Voter familiarity with the “Vail InDEED” program was relatively strong, with 25% being very familiar with the program and 34% somewhat familiar. Ø Many voters blame the growth and adoption of Airbnb and VRBO for the lack of housing for full-time residents. They think the long-term rental market has decreased significantly and short-term rentals have increased due to 2nd home owners using these services. Because of this, some voters suggest putting a limit on the total number of short-term rentals or applying a hotel tax to short-term rentals. Ø Many voters think Vail employers both big and small need to pay their employees more, so they can afford housing. Others believe employers should be more accountable for finding housing for their employees instead of the Town of Vail taking the lead in addressing the housing problem. Ø Some voters have an unfavorable opinion of deed-restricted housing because they think deed-restricted homes lower the property value of non-deed restricted homes within the same area. Voter Opinion of Lack of Available Homes for Residents in the Town of Vail A majority of respondents, 51%, think the lack of available homes in the Town of Vail is a very big problem and 32% think it is somewhat of a problem. The largest differences of opinion are driven by age, or more apparently where a respondent is in their stage of life. Among voters aged 44 or younger, a whopping 76% believe the lack of available homes is a very big problem compared to only 29% of seniors aged 65 or older. June 18, 2019 - Page 172 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 3 “How much of a problem is the lack of the availability of homes, including townhomes, condominiums and apartments for residents in the Town of Vail? Would you say the lack of affordable home is a big problem, somewhat of a problem, not too much of a problem or not a problem at all?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Big Problem 51% 47% 55% 76% 59% 29% 51% 60% 43% 84% 42% Smwt. Prob. 32% 30% 33% 15% 29% 44% 37% 23% 38% 13% 37% Not too much 11% 14% 9% 3% 9% 19% 10% 11% 9% 1% 15% Not a prob. 4% 7% 2% 4% 3% 6% 2% 3% 10% 1% 5% Refused 1% 2% 1% 2% 0% 2% 0% 3% 0% 1% 1% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. Voter Opinion of What Vail Should or Should Not do to Address Housing To gain a broad understanding of what the Vail community thinks should or should not be done to address the shortage of available homes in Vail, respondents were asked to provide their opinion. The responses are filled with strong opinions, emotion and frustration among homeowners and year-round residents. “Only allow home sales if it is a primary residence. There are far too many homes that sit empty for 50 weeks a year. You want to come here for only two weeks a year, rent a hotel room like everyone else.” – Male, 35-44 “Build more affordable projects like Vail Commons. The attempt at the new Chamonix was still way out of reach for 90% of front-line employees. People are lined up for a mile to look at Vail Commons units when they become available. This could happen down valley also. People will stay even if they have to commute. Miller Ranch was another good example.” – Male, 35-44 “Find a way to develop housing for long-term locals that is affordable. The people you need to keep are those professionals in lower management. Chamonix was not affordable for the population that needs housing the most.” – Female, 35-44 “Putting restrictions on Airbnb and VRBO rentals in town may help with the housing crisis. So many homeowners now rent short term to make more money when they used to rent their homes long term to the locals that work in the valley.” – Female, 35-44 “Outlaw short-term rentals. At the very least, the town should charge hotel tax to all short- term rentals. The town should also increase the property tax rate on 2nd home owners and decrease the property tax rate on primary home owners.” -Male, 35-44 June 18, 2019 - Page 173 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 4 “There are housing opportunities outside of Vail in the valley, which has excellent public transportation options. Would hate to see the town put up a bunch of housing/apartments.” – Female, 35-44 “I think we are going to have a big employee crisis if we don’t address housing issues.” – Female, 45-54 “Tax second home owners with a certain amount of square footage, require them to build or pay for employee units depending on how much jobs and work that would generate.” – Female, 45-54 “We should attain and/or build both rental and for-sale affordable housing. And we should do both as the town and through public/private partnerships.” -Female, 45-54 “Work with Vail Resorts and local businesses to develop a plan for more employee/local housing in Vail and the Valley as a whole.” – Female, 45-54 “Put more restrictions on short-term rentals. Most of the available housing that was once available to rent long term has now been turned over to short-term rentals and thus limiting the available housing. With the few options available the price has increased for those long- term rentals.” – Male, 45-54 “Market forces have always driven this problem. More supply is not always the right answer but perhaps subsidies that allow locals to buy is one way.” – Male, 55-64 “Many similar towns limit the percentage of home that can be [a] short-term rental, (Airbnb, VRBO), The percentage available to workers should be equal to those for short-term rental.” – Female, 55-64 “Need more subsidized housing. Vail Resorts is the largest employer, but they don’t provide enough housing and only pay a small percentage towards other options.” – Female, 55-64 “Work with local business and development companies to increase the availability of employee housing, throughout the county and not just down valley. Housing needs to increase close to Vail Village.” – Male, 65+ “For starters, build what private developers are building. So far, the density the town has built is embarrassing – virtually no increase at Timber Ridge, exceptionally low density at Champ despite pleas from many locals to include some multi-family building for example.” – Female, 45-54 “The unavailability of homes for residents has always been a problem to some degree. I think it’s important for the town to identify the factors contributing to this situation. In my view the proliferation of the “short term rental” in residential neighborhoods as a business June 18, 2019 - Page 174 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 5 model, and the virtually unrestricted 2nd, 3rd, 4th home market are contributing significantly to the availability and affordability of homes. Put a moratorium on short term rentals, and a housing impact fee on 2nd home purchases. Require that new or expanding businesses provide housing for employees as a cost of doing business. Our large local employers – Vail Resorts, Vail Health need to provide housing for their employees or contribute to a housing fund.” – Male, 55-64 “Build more affordable single-family houses that middle-class families can afford. Both me and my husband have good jobs working at the hospital. We save well and do not spend our money on unnecessary items, yet we still cannot afford a decent sized house from Eagle-Vail to Edwards where we would like to live. We would like to eventually have a family and will need a bigger place and do not want to share walls with noisy renters, but with the current housing situation this will not be possible due to lack of availability and price of homes. -Female, 18-34 “Raise property taxes on second and third homeowners who drain the resources of the town but do not contribute measurably through sales taxes as they are rarely here.” – Male, 35-44 “You cannot fix this, as long as we keep growing, we will never have all the housing you/we need.” – Male, 55-64 “The town should not subsidize housing for big employers who are growing each year but are not taking responsibility for their housing needs.” – Female, 55-64 “The Town of Vail should not support more high-density within its town limits. Vail, as a resort experience, is popular and successful because of its low-density charm. Over building by increasing density will ruin the charm which has made Vail successful. Vail should invest in improving transit up and down the valley. Employees need access but don’t need to live within walking distance of Vail Mountain.” – Female, 55-64 “Create a block of rent-controlled apartments/townhomes in various multi-unit buildings throughout Vail.” – Female, 55-64 “I agree with converting existing structures to deed-restricted housing. I do not agree with the development of open spaces and the vacant lands which make Vail special and welcoming to humans and animals. We must be good stewards of the land. I also agree with requiring new developments/hotels to include employee housing units.” – Female “More employee housing, restrictions on pricing, and restrictions on secondary home owners.” – Male, 18-34 June 18, 2019 - Page 175 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 6 Vail Local Housing Authority Image Rating Among all respondents, who are registered Vail voters, 39% have a favorable opinion of the Vail Local Housing Authority (VLHA), 34% have an unfavorable opinion and 21% of respondents have heard of the VLHA, but do not have an opinion of it. These numbers tell us there is room for improvement in educating and informing voters of the VLHA’s mission, programs and developments. “Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Vail Local Housing Authority?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Total Fav. 39% 40% 39% 31% 44% 41% 35% 49% 41% 26% 44% Total Unfav. 34% 36% 32% 31% 31% 36% 42% 20% 32% 36% 33% Hrd. of, no opin. 21% 19% 23% 28% 22% 18% 19% 27% 20% 28% 19% Never heard of 3% 3% 3% 9% 1% 2% 3% 3% 2% 9% 1% Refused 3% 2% 3% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% 5% 1% 3% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. Town of Vail Job Approval for Providing and Securing Homes for Residents Among all respondents, 52% approve of the actions the Town of Vail is doing providing and securing homes for residents, 36% disapprove and 12% do not have an opinion. Among respondents that say they are very familiar with the VLHA and Town of Vail’s mission, 49% disapprove of the Town of Vail’s actions and 51% approve. After reviewing some of the open-ended verbatim responses, we suspect the high disapproval rating is due to a general frustration with the lack of affordable housing options. “Do you approve or disapprove of the actions the Town of Vail is taking to provide and secure available homes for residents?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Total Approve 52% 50% 53% 48% 58% 50% 52% 53% 61% 47% 54% Total Disappr. 36% 36% 36% 34% 32% 38% 39% 26% 34% 33% 36% No Opinion 12% 13% 11% 18% 10% 12% 9% 21% 5% 19% 10% Refused 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. June 18, 2019 - Page 176 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 7 Voter Familiarity of VLHA and Town of Vail’s Missions One-third of respondents say they are very familiar with the Vail Local Housing Authority and the Town of Vail’s mission of providing and securing homes for residents, and 43% are somewhat familiar. Clearly, there is room for improvement educating and informing the Vail community of the Town and VLHA’s missions to address the lack of available homes for residents. “How familiar would you say you are with the mission of the Vail Local Housing Authority? Would you say you are very familiar, somewhat familiar, not too familiar or not familiar at all?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Very Fam. 29% 36% 21% 19% 30% 33% 34% 21% 31% 15% 32% Smwt. Fam. 43% 36% 51% 43% 42% 42% 42% 42% 42% 41% 44% Not Too Fam. 18% 19% 17% 20% 19% 17% 17% 23% 15% 20% 17% Not Fam. at All 10% 9% 11% 18% 9% 8% 7% 14% 12% 24% 7% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. “How familiar would you say you are with the Town of Vail’s mission of providing and securing homes for residents? Would you say you are very familiar, somewhat familiar, not too familiar or not familiar at all?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Very Fam. 34% 37% 31% 23% 37% 37% 40% 28% 31% 18% 39% Smwt. Fam. 43% 40% 46% 42% 42% 44% 44% 43% 42% 40% 44% Not Too Fam. 14% 12% 16% 23% 15% 9% 12% 17% 16% 27% 10% Not Fam. at All 9% 11% 7% 12% 6% 10% 4% 12% 11% 15% 7% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. Opinion of Government Making Efforts to Provide Deed Restricted Homes to Residents Seventy-five percent of respondents agree, and 46% strongly agree with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available, deed-restricted homes for residents. These are strong numbers and are encouraging for the Town of Vail and the VLHA as they begin to measure voter support for a possible permanent funding source. However, despite this positive observation of voter agreement with this viewpoint, general support for a sales or property tax increase is very weak. June 18, 2019 - Page 177 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 8 “As you may know, a resident-occupied, deed-restricted home limits the occupancy of the residence to a number of people that make the home their primary residence and are employed a minimum of 30 hours per week on an annual basis at a business located within Eagle County. Understanding what a deed-restricted home is, do you agree or disagree with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities like the Town of Vail should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available resident- occupied, deed-restricted homes for residents?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Total Agree. 75% 73% 78% 84% 79% 69% 76% 83% 76% 90% 72% Total Disagree 23% 25% 20% 12% 19% 30% 22% 13% 24% 6% 27% No Opinion 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 1% 2% 4% 10% 4% 1% Strong. Agree 46% 44% 48% 62% 49% 35% 45% 55% 43% 72% 39% Smwt. Agree 29% 29% 30% 22% 30% 34% 31% 28% 33% 18% 33% Strong. Disagr. 10% 11% 9% 5% 6% 15% 9% 5% 12% 4% 11% Smwt. Disagr. 13% 14% 11% 7% 13% 15% 13% 8% 12% 2% 16% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. Why 75% Agree Vail Should Maintain and Increase Supply of Deed-Restricted Homes The overwhelming reason 75% of respondents agree with the viewpoint that Vail should make reasonable efforts to maintain and supply deed-restricted homes is the concern and sympathy for the community workforce. The comments from respondents show a very strong belief that deed-restricted homes are a fundamental requirement in addressing the problem of affordable housing for workers serving the Vail community. There are also many comments that touch upon the need for better pay and higher wages to live in the Vail community. “It’s hard to find good employees. Creating more housing allows for our growing town to help employ our businesses.” – Female, 35-44 “The town and community are built around our mountain. The town and resort have a duty to help people that work hard to keep everything moving. How can we not help those people? Hard workers are being forced down valley because the wages cannot support living in this town.” -Male, 18-34 “Too much of our housing is second homes owned by non-residents who rent at inflated levels.” – Male, 65+ “Without affordable housing we will not have employees to keep our businesses running. We strive for a high level of customer service in Vail as we are a first-class resort. Without deed restricted homes the second homeowners will purchase all available and affordable options.” – Female, 55-64 June 18, 2019 - Page 178 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 9 “Because otherwise there won’t be anyone living here who also works in their community. The town will suffer for it if it becomes untenable to raise a family here.” – Female, 18-34 “It is hard to find affordable housing for typical residents of that area. The fact that they offer deed-restricted housing for people in that area who aren’t millionaires is important.” – Female, 35-44 “We need workers in jobs that do not necessarily pay well. Vail is an expensive community. Deed-restricted housing would help to reduce our problems in this regard.” – Male, 65+ “Without affordable housing for workers in Vail, the town is going to collapse.” – Male, 65+ Why 23% Disagree Vail Should Maintain and Increase Supply of Deed-Restricted Homes There are a few reasons 23% of respondents that disagreed with the viewpoint that the town should maintain and increase the supply of deed-restricted homes. One reason is the belief that local employers, big or small should pay their employees more so they can afford the cost of living in Vail. There is also a strong belief that deed-restricted housing harms the property values of non-deed restricted homes. Another view is the local governments and taxpayer money should not be used to provide local housing because that is the responsibility of local business. “Deed-restricted properties are impacting the value of other units in complexes that often end up staying on the market much longer, again impacting the sales of non-deed restricted properties. Given deed-restricted properties can still be quite pricey, for example over $600K for a 2-3BR in Vail, this price point is still very difficult for a new home buyer or lower economic bracket which keeps it on the market longer and is not serving the purpose it was meant to serve but does end up hurting the non-deed restricted properties.” – Female, 45-54 “Deed-restriction robs the owner of the opportunity to gain property value. Being stuck in a lower valued property would decrease incentive to maintain the property. As years pass the deed restricted homes will look out of place and potentially bring the town down.” – Female, 45-54 “The town of Vail should not be engaging it’s municipality in buying and selling real estate. It should be done by professional real estate people and developers. It is in conflict with their fiduciary duty to the citizens.” – Male, 65+ “Because the town then ramrods these projects into neighborhoods where they may not be suitable; size or density-wise. It is time for private business to pay a living wage for their circumstances. Or, at least assist their employees with transportation.” – Male, 65+ June 18, 2019 - Page 179 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 10 “Deed-restricted units harm re-sale value in the condo community. Also, why is it the government’s responsibility to house employees of local businesses? You are using my tax dollars to solve a problem that is the responsibility of the business owners.” – Male, 65+ “Vail Health and Vail Resorts should be paying the bulk of the cost of providing more deed- restricted housing. The Town of Vail can be a partner but should not should majority of the financial burden.” – Female, 55-64 Voter Awareness and Opinion of What a “Deed Restricted” Home Is The survey included an open-ended question asking voters what a “deed restricted” home is in order to verify and understand how Vail voters think about this important concept. The responses demonstrated a very clear and accurate understanding of what deed restrictions are and how they work. There were also a few comments regarding owners being limited to what they can do with the property. The following is a sample of responses: “It is a home that is only allowed to be appreciated by a controlled small amount each year.” – Female, 65+ “It is housing that can only be sold or leased to a full time Eagle County employee and may include limits on yearly appreciation.” – Female, 65+ “The community does not allow the property owner to do anything they want with it or rent to whomever they want.” – Male, 45-54 “A home to be purchased at a lower sales cost or with incentives (like down payment assistance) that can then only be sold with a certain percentage profit and maybe only to a full-time resident.” – Male, 18-34 “A home that can be on the free market but isn’t because it has been “deed-restricted” in order to temper the price and keep it as “affordable” as it can be for those living and working in the Town of Vail.” – Male, 35-44 Voter Awareness of the Town’s Deed Restricted Programs and Housing Developments This survey included questions to measure the familiarity of the “Vail InDEED” housing program and awareness of town’s involvement with two housing developments. Voter awareness of the town’s sponsorship and development with the Chamonix Vail Neighborhood was overwhelming with a 94% measurement. Fifty-one percent of voters were aware of the town’s deed-restriction purchases at 6 West Apartments in Edwards. Finally, one in four respondents said they were very familiar with the “Vail InDEED” programs and 34% somewhat familiar. June 18, 2019 - Page 180 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 11 “How familiar are you with “Vail InDEED”, the deed-restriction program that is managed by the Vail Local Housing Authority? Would you say you are very familiar, somewhat familiar, not too familiar or not familiar at all?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Very Fam. 25% 30% 20% 22% 30% 22% 34% 25% 18% 18% 27% Smwt. Fam. 34% 30% 38% 31% 35% 34% 30% 26% 43% 34% 35% Not Too Fam. 22% 20% 23% 20% 21% 25% 21% 28% 15% 28% 20% Not Fam. at All 19% 20% 19% 27% 14% 19% 15% 21% 24% 20% 18% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. “Are you aware the Town of Vail sponsored and developed the deed-restricted community Chamonix Vail Neighborhood?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Yes 94% 94% 94% 89% 96% 94% 94% 95% 93% 88% 96% No 6% 6% 6% 11% 4% 6% 6% 5% 7% 12% 4% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. “Are you aware the Town of Vail purchased deed-restrictions at the 6 West Apartments in Edwards that grants leasing preference to people employed in the Town of Vail?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Yes 51% 54% 48% 53% 53% 47% 60% 46% 44% 55% 50% No 49% 46% 52% 47% 47% 53% 40% 54% 56% 45% 50% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. Voter Opinion of the Town of Vail/Vail Local Housing Authority’s Mission After measuring awareness of the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority’s (VLHA) mission, respondents were read a description of their mission and then asked if they thought it was going in the right direction or off on the wrong track. The survey finds a slight majority, 53%, think the town and the VLHA are headed in the right direction and 31% felt they were off on the wrong track. The one voter subgroup that had the highest percentage of respondents thinking the mission was on the wrong track were seniors aged 65 and older, with 40% feeling the mission was on the wrong track. However, among voters 64 or younger, nearly two-thirds believe the mission is headed in the right direction. June 18, 2019 - Page 181 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 12 “The mission of the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority is to maintain and increase the supply of resident-occupied, deed-restricted homes for residents through the acquisition of deed restrictions. They do this with the goal of maintaining and sustaining community in Vail. To advance their mission, they apply an “all of the above” approach to identifying, acquiring and building future deed-restricted homes. This is done by researching and pursuing public-private partnerships, strategic initiatives, innovative programs and collaboration within the community. Recent examples of approaches taken to achieve their mission include Chamonix Vail Neighborhood, Vail InDEEd and 6 West Apartments. Understanding their mission, do you think the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority is headed in the right direction in working towards their mission or do you feel they are off on the wrong track?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Right Direction 53% 52% 54% 62% 60% 43% 47% 64% 56% 63% 52% Wrong Track 31% 31% 30% 23% 23% 40% 30% 23% 32% 22% 32% Unsure/No Opin. 16% 16% 15% 13% 17% 17% 22% 13% 11% 15% 16% Refused 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. General Support/Opposition for Sales or Property Tax for Housing Mission At this time there is little voter support for a possible sales or property tax to fund the VLHA’s mission of maintaining and increasing the support of resident-occupied deed restricted homes. Among all respondents, only 28% said they would be willing to support an unspecified sales or property tax increase, and 51% would not be willing to support a tax. Among the 28% of respondents that would be willing to support a tax increase to fund housing, 53% preferred a sales tax and 38% a property tax. However, with only 28% of all respondents willing to consider a tax increase to fund housing, we would recommend not putting a ballot measure before voters this year or in the near future. June 18, 2019 - Page 182 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 13 “The Vail Local Housing Authority, working at the direction of the Vail Town Council, is just beginning to have discussions with the community to listen, learn and understand what voters think of a possible sales or property tax increase to fund the housing authority’s mission. Knowing this, are you willing to support a sales or property tax increase to fund the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission of maintaining and increasing the supply of resident-occupied, deed-restricted homes for residents?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own Yes 28% 28% 28% 48% 24% 21% 30% 41% 17% 49% 22% No 51% 56% 46% 27% 50% 67% 48% 34% 68% 24% 59% Undecided 20% 16% 25% 25% 26% 12% 21% 25% 15% 27% 18% Refused 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. Informed Voter Opinion of Costs of a Property or Sales Tax Increase In an attempt to measure shifts in voter support for a general property or sales tax increase, the survey informed voters of the cost to a residential home owner for a 1 mill increase and a 0.25% sales tax increase. The survey measured 39% of voters being more likely to support a 1 mill increase and 37% being more likely to support a 0.25% sales tax increase. However, among the 51% of respondents that are not willing to support any tax increase, only 11% would be more likely to support after being informed about the cost of a 1 mill levy increase. After being informed about the sales tax increase costs, only 20% of the voters that would not being willing to support a tax increase would be more likely to consider it. “To better understand the cost of a property tax increase, a 1 mill increase on a residential property in the Town of Vail with a value of a half million dollars would cost a homeowner an additional $36 dollars per year. Knowing this information, are you more likely or less likely to support a property tax increase to fund the Town of Vail and the Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own More Likely 39% 33% 46% 62% 41% 22% 43% 50% 29% 67% 31% Less Likely 46% 53% 38% 24% 38% 67% 41% 34% 58% 19% 53% Unsure 13% 11% 14% 13% 18% 6% 12% 16% 11% 14% 12% Refused 2% 3% 2% 1% 3% 5% 4% 0% 2% 0% 4% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. June 18, 2019 - Page 183 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 14 “To better understand the cost of a sales tax increase to you as a consumer, the current local sales tax for purchases in the Town of Vail is 4.0%. The overall sales tax rate including state and county taxes is 8.4%. The cost of a 0.25% sales tax increase on a $100- dollar purchase is twenty-five cents. Knowing this information, are you more likely or less likely to support a sales tax increase to fund the Vail Town Council/Vail Local Housing Authority’s mission?” * Response All Men Wom 18- 44 45- 64 65+ Unaf Dem Rep Rent Own More Likely 37% 38% 37% 41% 37% 36% 38% 45% 35% 40% 37% Less Likely 47% 49% 44% 44% 39% 55% 46% 36% 53% 42% 47% Unsure 15% 13% 17% 14% 23% 8% 13% 18% 12% 16% 15% Refused 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 0% 2% 1% *Voter subgroup margins of error %, men 7.3%, women 7.4%, 18-44 10.8%, 45-64 8.7%, 65+ 8.9%, unaffiliated voters 9.9%, Democratic voters 9.3%, Republican voters 9.9%, rent home 12.5%, own home 5.7%. Voter Closing Thoughts and Suggestions for Town Council and Local Housing Authority The following is a sample of responses to a closing question asking voters if they had any thoughts, suggestions or opinions, positive or negative regarding housing for local residents that the wanted to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority. “There needs to be more real estate options. They should be more focused on what they are asking the people to pay. There needs to be more affordable housing here.” – Male, 18-34 “Focus on outlawing/restricting short term rentals. If the town doesn’t outlaw short term rentals, at least charge the owners hotel taxes. Increase the tax rate on 2nd home owners and decrease the tax rate on primary residents. This would drive down the price of real estate and should be the town’s primary focus.” – Male, 35-44 “Keep working on strategies to offer housing to locals in the Vail Valley.” – Male, 45-54 “We certainly need affordable housing, but I do not approve of build if it effects a wildlife habitat such as East Vail. I’ve lived in Vail for 40 years and the big horn sheep herds are dwindling. It seems we have forgotten why we have moved here.” – Female, 55-64 “I was happy to learn that Vail purchased housing in Edwards. I’m a full-time resident who works hard to make a living here and raise our kids. I’m in a Bald Mountain Townhome we purchased in 2008 at top value. I’ve been paying a big mortgage and my home value has not returned to our purchase price. I was a little angry when of our units was just converted to deed-restricted. It makes me feel like now my place will never come back. I have been watching giant new homes popup throughout East Vail, I get it. Normal folks do not live in those homes. I’m personally counting on the high-end development of Vail to bring up the value of my little place. Please don’t crush that possibility.” – Female, 45-54 June 18, 2019 - Page 184 of 404 Town of Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey Summary Field Dates: 5/22/19 to 6/5/19, 400n, MoE +/- 4.61% Magellan Strategies | 1685 Boxelder St. Suite 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.MagellanStrategies.com | (303) 861-8585 15 “It is vital to set up a permanent funding source for housing. It should be steady.” – Female, 65+ “With regard to increases in tax to pay for housing, in order to say yes I would need to know what is actually proposed.” – Male, 55-64 “I can’t support something that will not bring me direct benefit, I’ve been searching for an affordable place to live in myself. It is not reasonable to support a tax increase when I am unable to get housing myself.” – Female, 35-44 “The current deed restricted properties are still too expensive for the regular Vail worker.” – Female, 45-54 “Restating that they should limit the Air B& B’s that take aware from full time residents being able to find or purchase housing.” – Female, 45-54 “Something needs to be done. We are losing valuable employees as a result of the lack of affordable housing both as rentals and purchases. It needs to be at a much fast pace than is currently implemented.” – Male, 55-64 “The word is out. There is a shortage of affordable housing in Eagle County. The result, homes are being built, many more planned. Let the marketplace solve the issue. Not everyone can live in Vail city limits. Provide subsidized transportation and cheap parking with the town for employees. More cost effective than getting into the real estate business.” – Male, 65+ “I have shared my concerns with an emphasis being placed on housing within the Town of Vail. I feel that both the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority would be wise to look at down valley housing options and potentially consider added transportation to/from these locations.” – Female, 55-64 Conclusion At this time there is a lack of consensus among people in the Vail community on the best approach to solving the problem of affordable housing. However, we hope this voter opinion research will lead to a broader discussion of solutions that will generate more awareness of what is being done to solve this complicated problem. June 18, 2019 - Page 185 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 1 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Yes they should address it. It is a a community issue. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG I think they should build more affordable housing. I think that the rich people need to be okay with that being in their neighborhood. Everyone wants affordable housing, but not in their neighborhood. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Build more affordable housing. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Continue to build employee housing and low income housing. For example, the project east of the Vail mountain school, the valley is desperate for more beds. As we are not going to reinvent the wheel, we should continue to increase employee housing, first time home buyer programs, and more affordable housing options within the town. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG They should be providing more affordable housing for the locals. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Continue the deed restriction program. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Find a way to develop housing for long term locals that is affordable. The people you need to keep are those professionals in lower management. Chamonix was not affordable for the population that needs housing the most. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Help subsidize housing any way you can. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Putting restrictions on Airbnb and VRBO rentals in town may help with the housing crisis. So many homeowners now rent short term to make more money when they used to rent their homes long term to the locals that work in the valley. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG I don't really know. I guess I would say to allow buildings. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Build more affordable projects like Vail Commons. The attempt at the new Chamonix was still way out of reach for 90% of front line employees. People are lined up for a mile to look at Vail Commons units when they become available. This could happen down valley also. People will stay even if the have to commute. Miller Ranch was another good example. June 18, 2019 - Page 186 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 2 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Only allow home sales if it is a PRIMARY residence. There are far too many homes that sit empty for 50 weeks a year. You want to come here for only two weeks a year, rent a hotel room like everyone else. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Outlaw short-term rentals. At the very least, the town should charge hotel tax to all short term rentals. The town should also increase the property tax rate on 2nd home owners and decrease the property tax rate on primary home owners. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Given the limited land in the Town of Vail and the nature of Vail, I feel the town should work with neighboring districts to find land suitable for building more affordable housing. I do not feel building more of these types of properties (subsidized/employee housing)in the town of Vail helps in the way it should. And, if the town can identify areas loose but outside the town, transportation should also be considered and provided. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG I think we are going to have a big employee crisis if we don't address the housing issues. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Subsidize housing. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Tax second homeowners with a certain amount of square footage, require them to build or pay for employee units depending on how much jobs and work that could generate. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG The town should build more rental units between Middle Creek and the new parking garage. Vail resorts should add more housing between Lionhead and Donavan. Town should not appove any more development for large projects unless the housing needs for new staff are addressed as part of the proposal. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG We should attain and/or build both rental and for sale affordable housing. And we should do so both as the Town and through public/private partnerships. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Work with Vail Resorts and local businesses to develop a plan for more employee/local housing in Vail and in the Valley as a whole. June 18, 2019 - Page 187 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 3 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG For the deed-restricted homes, they should continue to purchase as many deed restrictions as they can. The bigger problem now is that we are passing up the opportunity to create more housing for residential employees. Passing over the recent East Vail project was a huge opportunity that was missed. We lost the opportunity for more than 40 apartment style units due to town politics. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Housing issues can be slightly alleviated by reversing the new 3 hour parking restrictions and no overnight parking at the Pitkin trail head. The Pitkin Townehomes have numerous units with multiple Vail workers per unit. You just took away the overflow parking. I estimate 10 people are gone. The town also lost those people who live in their camper vans at the trail heads. These people work in Vail. I was going to rent out a spare room. I'm unable to due to this due to the new parking restrictions. I can deal with the parking issue if I went the Air B&B option. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Put more restrictions on short term rentals. Most of the available housing that was once available to rent long term has now been turned over to short term rentals and thus limiting the available housing. With the few options available the price has increased for those long term rentals. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG They have to. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Many similar resort towns limit the percentage of homes that can be in short term rental. (airbnb or vrbo). The percentage available to workers should be equal to those for short term rental. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Need more subsidized housing. Vail Resorts is largest employer but they don't provide enough housing and only pay a small percentage towards other options. June 18, 2019 - Page 188 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 4 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Finance building town homes on infill lots if any available for rent or deed restricted sales which hopefully pay some of cost back. Would need to be subsidized somehow. Also give developers of large projects extra higher density if they subsidize or build employee housing. Educate neighbors to stop seeing employee housing as the end of their privileged neiborhood. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG I don't know. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Keep making housing a priority. Spend the money wisely within the town's borders, not down valley. Vote off the council members who didn't approve the east Vail housing. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Vail SHOULD NOT penalize the rent by owner population. RBO is NOT the root cause of this problem. Financial incentives should be created for the private sector to provide employee housing. Large employers such as Vail Resorts and Vail Health should be forced to comply with housing strategies similar to the other large employer in town - the Town itself. The Town should also implement a minimum wage to provide a sustainable wage. The town of Vail needs a good negotiator to get the East Vail project back on track. Anything less than several hundred beds is unacceptable. don't blow this opportunity! MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Yes I think the town should continue efforts to address the housing shortage. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Build more affordable housing. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Build more deed restricted homes. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Fund workforce housing in sites not environmentally harmful to the best of its ability. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Look for sites down Valley. All workers in moderate priced housing do not need to live inside Town of Vail limits. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG They should have more low-cost housing for workers. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Build or JV in housing projects. June 18, 2019 - Page 189 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 5 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Continue deed restriction purchase, place fees on new single family and duplex development, property tax increase,focus proceeds of Transfer Tax on housing. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Create a permanent funding source. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Increase outreach efforts to form coalitions to address the need and realization of sustainable and affordable housing. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Purchase the Roost property and partner with a developer. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG I'm not sure. There is much that they can do frankly. I don't agree in paying millions to develop housing on bad sites. If there are open sites in the town center, I think they should do it and subsidize it. FEMALE 18-34 OTHER OWN BIG It will allow for more employee housing. Specifically, it will develop the land in East Vail and allow more condominiums to be built in residential areas. FEMALE 35-44 OTHER OWN BIG Timberridge should be re-built to 5 stories high, rebuilding like for like is insane. Town of Vail should stop buying houses for their employees, Town of Vail should build new housing - maybe by the bus depot in East Vail, for their housing. Taking more houses off the market isn't helping. FEMALE 45-54 OTHER OWN BIG Request Vail Resorts build dorm-style accommodations on their Never Vail property. It would decrease the influx of transients who don't really care about our community. It would also decrease seasonal workers, parking problems, transportation problems, buying then disposing of junk furniture, etc. June 18, 2019 - Page 190 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 6 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN BIG I think that Vail Resorts should be a more active partner with the town in developing housing. They are the largest employer and it seems that the town is funding all the housing project for their employees. It would be nice if Vail Resorts took the onus to purchase, work with developers to add housing to the town for their employees to live in. For example: the last council meeting around the project where the big horn sheep typically roam, why was the Town of Vail financing that project? Why wouldn't Vail Resorts finance that project and just make it housing for their employees? It would be interesting to see what the % breakdown of the housing gap is by employer or business type... FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN BIG All I know is that it is unsafe for people who work in town and live in Vail, unless they live with a lot of roommates. Anything that could help bring in more emergency service personnel closer to town would help. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN BIG Build more apartments such as timber ridge type. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN BIG The town needs to be more proactive in supplementing those with rental units available so the owners can charge less for rent but not shorted on fair market value. This would allow for owners to allow 6 month rentals for seasonal workers and allow some financial breathing room for the work force coming to Vail who can not afford to pay $1000+ just for their room. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN BIG Build apartments on town owned land to house employees. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN BIG Carefully consider where they build and what they tell potential current residents in that area what in fact is going to happen and what it will look like. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG Buy some land further out in Eagle-Vail or Avon, build a complex like TimberRidge on it and operate buses every 30 minutes in the winter from 6 am to 10 pm to bring workers in to Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 191 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 7 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG I have noticed that there are lots of housing units going up in Edwards. Perhaps the Town of Vail could secure some units and continue to provide free ECO bus passes to move employees and cut down on parking woes. I STRONGLY BELIEVE that the East Vail Parcel should NOT be built upon-for anything. MALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG The unavailability of homes for residents has always been a problem to some degree. I think it's important for the Town to identify the factors contributing to this situation. In my view the proliferation of the "short term rental" in residential neighborhoods as a business model, and the virtually unrestricted 2nd, 3rd, 4th home market, are contributing significantly to the availability and affordability of homes. Put a moratorium on short term rentals, and a housing impact fee on 2nd home purchases. Require that new or expanding businesses provide housing for employees as a cost of doing business. Our large local employers - VR, Vail Health need to provide housing for their employees or contribute to a housing fund. Public / private partnerships and subsides similar to In Deed to fill in the gaps. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN BIG YES! Without housing, Town of Vail can not continue to thrive. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN BIG Work with local businesses and development companies to increase the availability of employee housing, throughout the county and not just down valley. Housing needs to increase close to Vail Village. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN BIG For starters, build what private developers are building. So far the density the Town has built is embarassing - virtually no increase at timber Ridge, exceptionally low density at Champ is despite pleas from many locals to include some multi-family buildings, for example. June 18, 2019 - Page 192 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 8 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN BIG Restructure archaic rules to allow existing townhouse associations to more easily expand when they want to add employee housing or deed restricted units. Additionally, build bigger on sites that make sense. Lions Ridge is an expensive joke. When the rest of Timber Ridge is planned for demolition the replacement plans should be for a huge amount of units. Do a better job of enforcing Airbnb and other short term rental places so taxes are paid. Do not mess up again on East Vail causing a good man to lose his job. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Build more affordable single family houses that middle class families can afford. Both me and my husband have good jobs working at the hospital, I am a therapist with Howard Head and he works for a medical device company. We save well and do not spend our money on unnecessary items, yet we still cannot afford a decent sized house from Eagle-Vail to Edwards where we would like to live. We currently own a town home in Eagle-Vail which I bought a few years ago. We would like to eventually have a family and will need a bigger place and do not want to share multiple walls with noisy renters, but with the current housing situation this will not be possible due to lack of availability and price of homes. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG More affordable renting opportunities and more places that allow pets. FEMALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG No comment. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Tax the Airbnb, VRBO, etc more. Explore options to build complexes in the valley. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Build more affordable housing both rental and purchase. I suggest using the old "Roost" property for affordable housing rather than trying to squeeze a hotel on it. We have a tremendous number of hot beds but no staff due to the lack of housing. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Buy some property to build condos in Avon and/or Edwards before those places get as expensive as Vail! June 18, 2019 - Page 193 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 9 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG I do believe that the town of Vail should be building housing for people in Vail. We need housing. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Continue working with the private sector owners and developers of property to provide incentives to increase the supply of housing. Also, work with other municipalities to lower entitlement costs for new development. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Make it more reasonable for builders to get housing built, weather it be single family, duplexes, townhomes or condos. Ultimately the cost is passed onto the consumer. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG We need to rent the richer home-peopled houses out. They definitely need to figure out something. People can't afford to live here anymore. It is sad to see that the people who come here cannot find places to live. I don't know what they can do about that, but that is what is going on. No one can afford to live here anymore. It is not like when I came here in the '80s. That is for sure. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG They should build more units, buy up vacant lands, and make them deed-restricted units. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Build affordable housing units for employees on land that does not impact wildlife. Purchase older teardowns in Matterhorn or West Vail and rebuild/remodel. What about the Roost space? FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Buy the Roost property and turn it in to employe housing. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Do not know. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Town of Vail should explore all options to create affordable rental and permanent housing for people who work full time in Vail. The housing should be developed with regards to maintaining the environment, having the least impact on struggling wildlife populations, what Vail's current roads and bus routes can handle as well as the struggles of increasing traffic and closures of I-70. There should be more affordable options for full time workers to buy as well as more incentive for current owners to rent long term to seasonal employees. June 18, 2019 - Page 194 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 10 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG They have to redevelop the forest service site and utilize all of entities of the government in businesses. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG I believe the town has to find private businesses like VR as major partners for funding- more so than resident tax increases, although as residents we would be in the game too. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG We need to look outside the box for housing, mainly for our employees who work for the town of Vail. We are loosing full time critical bus drivers to the lack of affordable places to reside. This vicious circle of hiring, training and loosing employees has to stop. We are burning people out during the summer months and winter months. Period. Build another buzzard park. Purchase homes in Dotsero. This will eventually come down to the non stop training of bus personnel and other departments as well within the town. We don't need another library or conference center. We need affordable housing , we are in a critical crisis stage Now! Housing should be on top of the every ones list. Thanks for listening. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG The town of Vail needs to vote correctly on opportunities that come up and that are financially prudent. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Look even harder at Town owned property and be prepared to make BOLD moves. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG More deed restricted housing, with low starting cost. Low cost rental units run by the Town of Vail or VR. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG I have no comments. MALE REFUSED REPUBLICAN OWN BIG They should have voted to fund the East Vail Housing project. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Get more creative. Us the land that post office is on, either build up from there or move it and develop the whole thing. Actively seek out a developer to redo west Vail shopping are and put housing above commercial businesses. Etc etc. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Continue with Vail indeed program. Maybe utilize some open space tracts in Hyland Meadows area for Chamonix, type 3 housing. June 18, 2019 - Page 195 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 11 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Address VRBO - it is changing the culture of every neighborhood negatively. We no longer have people who work in the village or town renting in the neighborhood. Our neighborhood has drastically changed in the last 10 years. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Limit short-term rentals if possible,enforce current employee housing units, try to create a tax on second home owners and/or large new construction to help pay for affordable housing. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Redevelop and add capacity to Timber Ridge, purchase Roost parcel and develop, consider areas West of Lionshead and East of Cascade Village for opportunities FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG They should build housing on any open space in the town of Vail. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG The town should put massive pressure on local issues and payments. Of course, the residents cannot keep up with the wages. They are so high. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Create a dedicated housing fund. Partner with public and private entities and look from East Vail to Gypsum and perhaps to red cliff and leadville to find opportunites that create the most benefit to the community recognizing that not everyone wants to live in Vail, but that Vail benefits from housing throughout the Valley. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Further regulate short term rentals by capping the number of registrations allowed in certain zoning areas, or creating higher taxes/fees for properties owned as second homes or by out-of-town owners. The higher tax rates and fees could be put into developing more deed restricted housing. New deed restricted development is preferable to deed restricting existing housing because of the quality and ability to create units suitable for varying household sizes. Deed restricting existing housing also removes homes from the market and may ultimately increase the cost of housing in the Town. The economic impact is unknown, but by creating new deed restricted units a secondary market would be created, which is not impacting existing homes. June 18, 2019 - Page 196 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 12 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Less fifth-home owners, more locals. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Obviously do what is within the towns power to build more affordable housing. However, the master resale list lottery system needs to change back to resemble how it used to be. The new format doesn't favor those as heavily who have lived here and paid their dues to stay here. These are the people that have moved countless times, paid ridiculously high rent, and lived in less than desirable living situations, all to stay in Vail. These are the people that make this town go round and they should be rewarded. Someone that just moved here should not have any chance against a long time local looking to stay. We've lost too many good people for our community that have had to move away. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Seasonal workforce housing for those who cant afford market rate. Use an hourly wage of $15 for your monthly budgeting feasibility. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG They should restrict the high cost homes. Those who have high cost homes should make them affordable to those who work in the valley. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG They should start by using the unused areas and fixing what can be fixed rather than new developments. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Add more affordable housing, including monitoring the HOA fees at the deed restricted homes. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Affordable housing in Vail. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Deal with AirBnB, VRBO, etc. so these homes go back to regular residential (not part time commercial) use, and can be available for long term rental. Can there be an incentive for rental properties? Also keep up the deed restrictions, buy-downs, etc. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Encourage more 2nd homeowners to rent to long term rentals instead of short term, possibly with some incentives. Maybe a discount on something - parking passes? rec passes? more tax on short term rentals? FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I don't know how to address this issue; obviously a problem for not only Vail, but for other ski mountain communities. June 18, 2019 - Page 197 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 13 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I think the town should increase free bus service beyond Vail. I don't think it's unreasonable that folks commute to Vail for work from down valley. heck people travel over an hour each way to work in the cities because cost of living is too high downtown. I hate to see Vail stuff low income housing into our open spaces. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Buy any available land (Roost Lodge property, for example) and build apartments. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Continue the Vail Indeed program. Continue to subsidize private sector projects to achieve housing. Allow the East Vail Project. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Continue to look for land, distressed properties, and funding sources to acquire additional deed restrictions. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Public private partnerships. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Rebuild Timber Creek, put new housing in at Buzzard Park, condemn the Roost Lodge site and put housing there. Then DEED restrict these units to people working in the Town of Vail and, if it's needed to raise funds, sell them to local businesses. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG VRBO type housing has displaced quite a few employees. It's time to think of an apartment complex style living situation. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Continue to fund deed restricted properties. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Effective partnerships, public/private, so the tax payer doesn't need to foot the burden entirely. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Everything you can. Build, buy and buy deed restrictions. Focus resources on retaining families in town, not just seasonal but year- round. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Find financial partners to develop available land for 1,2, and 3 bedroom homes; to include townhomes, condominiums and apartments. I don't think it's the Town's full financial responsibility. However, if we are going to keep young adults, couples and families in Vail, we must have affordable housing. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I do think that putting up affordable housing helps. If we need more, hopefully more will be built. June 18, 2019 - Page 198 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 14 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG The Town should pursue a dedicated funding source for its housing programs; and actively engage in public-private partnerships for development and/or acquisition of resident housing. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Use the revenue and in partnership with Vail Resorts develop additional multi unit housing options , either in town or surrounding areas such as Avon, Minturn, Edwards,..etc. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Adopt more restrictive Rent by Owner rules in order to limit the number of short term rentals in neighborhoods. This would help encourage non-resident owners to return to the practice of renting their units to employees on a long term basis. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I think that the "dead restricted" housing that was built in W Vail is nice but not many real residents that are trying to live in town can afford something costing $400 - 700,000! If that's affordable I don't call that "sustainable." Vail Resorts is the largest employer and I know that they try to accommodate but what are the real demographics of the VR emp? Folks that are in late 20's or more don't want to live 4 to a bedroom. The valley is restricted by space available to really build affordable/employee housing. Its a place that is dominated by 2nd/3rd home owners and thats what it is! MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I think the town should focus and build two classes of affordable housing. 1. Units suitable for young families 2. Seasonal employee high density maximizing beds not cars on the bus route. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Limit short term rentals. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Require employers, including Vail resorts and Vail health, to provide employee housing options proportional to the number of employees they have. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Deed restrict more units and stop allowing short term rentals in residential neighborhoods. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Well I came in 1973 homes where cheaper but still had to work 2 full time jobs to make my payments now people come here to just work a bit and play a lot not possible to make your payments. June 18, 2019 - Page 199 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 15 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG They should continue and magnify what they are already doing and strongly support further efforts for local housing. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Look at open space uses. We are surrounded by millions of acreas of open space. open space needs for urban regions is important. Here in Vail it's kind of senseless to tie up open space when if you just turn around you are looking at BLM and forest land as far as the eye can see. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG The town needs to build single family homes in the community that are reasonably priced. No one can afford to live here and we have become a VERY transient. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG If they're residents... don't they already have homes? Are you referring to seasonal employees? Or potential home buyers? it's Vail, high end real estate, you need $ to purchase here. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG The town has a limited ability to impact the problem locally. Much of the housing will be outside the Town of Vail . Any Town of Vail involvement must be strategic and fiscally responsible. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG The town of Vail should limit or cut the short term rentals availability and focus more on long term or permanent residents, specially if working in the town of Vail. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG Continue to regulate and subsidize stock and access to affordable housing by looking at density, seasonality, among other criteria. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG Let the free market decide. MALE 35-44 REFUSED REFUSED BIG Increase deed restricted housing for locals employed in Vail by the Town of Vail. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG Build deed restricted housing like Miller Ranch. we're surrounded by land, build on it. June 18, 2019 - Page 200 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 16 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG Short Term rentals killed the mtn town. Airbnb, VRBO, and the like have taken the residences of more than 5 of my friends. I love Airbnb, but there should be tighter restrictions on what properties can become short term rentals, and the taxes on them in Eagle County should be a disincentive for new owners looking for an Airbnb in the mtns. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG Regulate the rents (people abuses the need for housing and charges ridiculous amount of money for renting their properties) All the affordable housing market is on waiting list... it is just impossible for residents to find affordable housing now. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG No comment. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Continue to limit and enforce rules on short-term rentals; provide financial incentives (outside of permanent deed restrictions) to homeowners that encourage them to rent to full-time residents (for landlords, make long-term rentals financially competitive with short term rentals); provide a small housing subsidy/stipend to full-time residents who rent; work with neighboring towns to make deed restrictions and similar policies more equitable in the upper valley (Edwards/Avon/Minturn). FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG I think creating multiple bedroom units is creating a worse problem. Many people thrive and want to live in a one bedroom apartment but can't afford it. Also, create more realistic home buying opportunities for homebuyers. Right now, the cheapest home I can find in the valley is a crappy cabin for $600,000. I made $60,000 and will have to move out of the area if I want to buy a house. The problem is driving aware important and productive members of our community. No one wants to live in a 4 bedroom house with a bunch of other people. Make 1 bedroom apartments that are affordable!!!!! FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG If there is land available, it would be wonderful to have another development like Chamonix. Something to give members an opportunity to purchase property. June 18, 2019 - Page 201 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 17 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Make the "affordable" housing more approachable. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG More deed restricted/affordable options for working, year-round locals. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG They should offer more deed-restricted and affordable housing. We are also in need of rental properties that need to be offered with a 6- month lease or more. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG They should think about the young, struggling employees that "make Vail go 'round". Not just the 2nd and 3rd homeowners that are here for 1 month out of 12 and offer little to nothing for the community. Once they have actually thought of the struggling employee, I feel the obvious suggestion is to purchase more housing in Vail and make it affordable... $2,000+ a month for a 1 bedroom not including utilities when making $10/hour is not affordable by any means. The average millennial makes less than their monthly rent and are some of the only people willing to live like a bum. Why are you penalizing employees who want to live here year-round as well as start their careers, but employees who are here 6 months or less are first to get housing? Another suggestion is to have separate housing for seasonal and year- round employees so year-round employees aren't penalized by trying to better their life longer than the average seasonal. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG They should make affordable housing that is actually affordable or provide buyer assistance programs, for instance, for first-time buyers. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Build. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Build affordable housing similar to Middle Creek where only those who qualify can get hosing at a discounted rate. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Limit VRBO to help the rental market and build actual affordable homes. Not townhomes startling at over 400,000. June 18, 2019 - Page 202 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 18 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Provide affordable housing contracts to developers. Expand the Indeep deed restriction program. Somewhat restrict short term rentals. Provide benefits of some sort to first time eagle county resident home buyers, such as tax breaks, money for remodeling dated homes or assistance with down payments. The quality of employees will go down if they have no place to live and someone has to live and work in Vail to help its continued success. If normal people are priced out, then skilled workers and community members will not be attracted to the valley or will leave and this will not be good for local business or locals quality of life. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG The town should encourage more affordable housing options based on median income minus the top and bottom 10% of earners who's primary place of work is within the town of Vail. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG They should restrict the number of rental properties. They should at least restrict how soon they are able to rent it as a vacation rental as opposed to a long-term rental. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It would be great if the town would be able to budget money for projects like the Chamonix Townhomes. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Limit the Airbnb/Vrbo of houses and condos possibly so there are more long term rentals available? FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG They should find a way to subsidize rent. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG More affordable housing options. Less short term rentals i.e. AirBnB. Some sort of rent control. Peter Noble buying too many properties and raising rent due to high demand. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG More private parternships and subsidies to make homes actually "affordable" Chamonix homes being $600k + is laughable. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG 1. Limit the amount of AirB&B's 2. Create another Miller Ranch-type neighborhood JUST FOR LOCALS. June 18, 2019 - Page 203 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 19 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG 1) Build IN/UP (quads/duplex/studio/above retail) rather than more multi-million SFH. Incentivize developers to build multi-unit dwellings. 2) Remodel single level retail/strip malls to include 2nd floor condos 3) Incentivize landlords to rental to year-round locals - confirmation of work salary, registered voting, license plates. 4) Prioritize mid-level professionals that work in city limits (we're not all families with kids!) FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Allow the people who have lived here longest be able to attain housing first, rather than young trust funders just moving here. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It should. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Make "affordable housing" actually affordable for the regular worker. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG They should address it by having more housing and putting it into subsidized housing. We could have more seasonal housing. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG They need to build apartment complexes that are for long term rentals only. They also need to build homes that will be sold to residents of Eagle County to be lived in by them, and that have some sort of restriction on who is able to buy them. Previous developments have allowed anyone in the Valley to buy, including wealth residents. This does nothing to help younger residents with families. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG They should restrict short-term rentals. MALE 18-34 OTHER RENT BIG Actually build affordable housing, make VRBOs less desirable or offer incentives for owners that choose to long term rent instead of VRBO in order to open up housing that was lost to VRBOs. MALE 18-34 OTHER RENT BIG More incentive to build affordable housing for the people that work in the town. (The problem is same throughout the valley) but if the town wants to be a place where people come to vacation/live then there must be people to work the service sectors(restaurant workers, etc). Without affordable options, there wont be workers. Without workers, there wont be services and in turn, all the revenue from tourists/vacationers will go away. It is a very real problem. June 18, 2019 - Page 204 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 20 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 OTHER RENT BIG The general consensus is that without affordable housing the town will eventually out grow itself due to a lack of year round employees. Believe it or not without workers all industries will suffer so my making housing affordable you will attract people who wish to building Vail as their community as opposed to a six month stop in their life. FEMALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG Open up the topic as a project to top Architecture schools across the world as a competition awarding prizes to the top entrants and if possible, modified execution. FEMALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG The town of Vail should limit the BROB and bnb for the people who have second homes up here. I am lucky that I came in 1996. I still rent. In the next 5 to 10 years, we will really be in a trouble. People won't be able to afford to live here and make it a community. I'm getting ready to leave this town because the people who are rich don't care about the people who don't have money. MALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG I am 53 and I have to live with 5 roomates. share a bathroom. in Minneapolis I could have an entire house, on a lake. MALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG The housing crisis is seasonal but Town of Vail has to work with communities throughout the Valley and counties to solve this issue including employers who undervalue employee pay in a wholistic way. MALE 55-64 OTHER RENT BIG Quit letting the Vail HOA dictate the max number of units on any new affordable housing that might be built in the future; like they did with Lionsridge. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG 1. Enforce a max amount of rent money per person on rentals. How are locals supposed to afford $1000+/room/person? 2 bedrooms are $2k+/mo.. 2. Enforce a max amount of condominiums to be sold to second home owners per year. How can locals find housing if they are competing with second home owners wanting to buy versus rent? June 18, 2019 - Page 205 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 21 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG Make "affordable housing" actually affordable. The last affordable housing project in Vail was way out of any middle working class persons budget ($450,000-750,000). More communities like Miller Ranch would be appreciated. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG Short term rentals should not be allowed. Airbnb/VRBO ruins the long term market. There are plenty of hotels in the valley. MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG Harsher fines on people not fully registered for Airbnb type rentals, a cap on how many people or properties can be short term rentals. So many people also own multiple units who never use nor care about the local people. Our rent money often goes right back out of our community to owners who do not live in Vail not Vail based businesses. MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG More available deed restricted housing for sale in the Town of Vail . MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG Provide cheaper housing/neighborhoods for residents. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT BIG Partner with developers to create housing areas. And not way down valley in Eagle/Gypsum. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT BIG Regulate short term rentals like any other commercial business and enforce zoning laws that prevent commercial businesses that charge nightly rates from operating in residential neighborhoods. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED RENT BIG Put an end to short term rentals. Higher taxes on homes that sit empty. If they are rich enough to let them sit empty all year, they are rich enough to pay higher taxes. MALE 45-54 REFUSED RENT BIG More deed restricted/affordable housing. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED RENT BIG Find a place and a way to build actual affordable housing for employees. The second home owners and anyone else opposing affordable home development need to be aware that we wouldn't be here to serve them if we don't have affordable housing. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED RENT BIG I have no idea. I think affordable housing is a huge problem especially for the working class. Rental pricing is so high, the availability of long term rentals is low. I don't know how you fix this. June 18, 2019 - Page 206 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 22 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG Actually provide affordable housing to its employees after 10 years of service. FEMALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG They need to build something for employees or something. They need to build something so that there would affordable housing for employees. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG It would be great if they subsidize housing with town homes for year round folks, apartment-style housing for seasonal workers, and adding single-family homes. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG I do not think its the towns problem, its the owners of the businesses who do not take in consideration the cost of living. Unfortunately, due to the supply and demand the landlords have a case to raise your rent every year to $50 - $100 dollars. This takes a toll on the local business due to others not being able to afford the rent due to the cost of living. The problem will be lack of employees in the future, I have seen this occurring more for lack of employees than in the past years. I would have Peter Nobel tear down his employee housing in Matterhorn and build upon the property more housing that is sufficient for employees at his cost. The VRBIO's are taking over the county. The only solution is to build more housing to accommodate the locals and put restrictions on how much the property management could raise the rent over time. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG They should figure out how to use the tax money or else they should have Vail Resort's income to provide for the locals or resident's houses. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG There is a lack of affordable housing. Airbnb messed things up. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG Purchase or lease more apartments. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG They need to stop allowing people to have them as second homes. The other problem is that the people who live here rent out their homes like a hotel. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG Move affordable housing to the fore front of their projects. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Affordable housing. June 18, 2019 - Page 207 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 23 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Build more affordable homes. Put a wealth cap on deed restricted housing. Require hotels, large businesses, and owners of huge homes to include employee housing in their blue prints. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Either provide more affordable housing options or provide breaks for Town of Vail residents in certain income brackets who are not living in affordable housing. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I think more affordable housing is nessecary, not just for Vail employees, but for all people making less than 30,000/year. This means apartments for $650 or less. This is AFFORDABLE. A studio apartment for over $1000 is crazy. I make $20,000/year as a preschool teacher, this county would not run without teachers like me yet the only way I can afford to live here is not having a car and splitting my apartment cost with my boyfriend and 2 other roommates. I can't even think about having a family here so I'll move away before I do. Which means this county has one less qualified teacher who actually loves her job. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I think the Town of Vail should make the short term rentals of properties (ie Airbnb, VRBO, etc) illegal or taxed/fined in a way that will put rentals and houses back on the market for those who actually live and work here. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I think the town should address the housing shortage. However, I think it needs to be done in an appropriate way (EX: NOT IN EAST VAIL). There should be a low impact on taking away animal homes and a focus on conservation. There should also be better housing options for people who live here year round and not just seasonally. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I'm not sure. I believe home prices have continuously increased and become unaffordable to most locals here in the valley. The few options that are available for rent are usually not well kept and charge a high monthly rate; if you can even find one to begin with. June 18, 2019 - Page 208 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 24 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Instead of creating housing complexes (i.e. The Lion) that start above $1M create complexes that the actual employees, the people who keep this place attractive for tourists, can afford. Ridiculous that the people who create this tourist trap are the ones who scrimp by each month and have to sleep in their cars because the "affordable" housing still costs $2200+ per month on a VR wage of $12.50 an hour... FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG The lack of housing is an issue. It has put my household in a financial strain because we were forced to find a place to live at the higher end of our income bracket. All though you might get lucky and find a place to live, it's a strain on our pocket for sure. Also, deed restrictions within other valleys have made it damn near impossible to find housing elsewhere due to how long wait lists are. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I think the problem is that the town of Vail needs to provide affordable housing for some of their employees. The town of Vail needs any kinds of local service-oriented jobs and should definitely have housing available in some way. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG The town of Vail and the resorts need to help with the assistance for affordable housing. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Address the towns main employer, Vail Resorts, to increase wages to boost employment and able to afford living where they work. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Give incentive for home owners or second home owners to allocate unused space in their homes for the working class of the valley. Much of this conversation revolves around "Not enough space!" there is plenty of space in they valley, however, most of this space is occupied by vacant vacation homes. This sounds like a tax break for the rich, you could also tax those with excess space who wish to not help the local community. June 18, 2019 - Page 209 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 25 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I think the town should continue the Vail Indeed program. I think the town should also make it easier to develop affordable housing (up zone areas suitable for high density housing, streamline the development process, etc...) MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Start forcing semi permanent residences to start offering rooms or they need to relocate. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG There should be more designated areas for full term residents. The Chamonix development was a great idea and great start but more opportunities like that would be huge. As well as similar opportunities in the rental/leasing market. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG That would be the poor quality at a high cost. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Start building employee housing that is actually in Vail and affordable. lions ridge apartments are the only new structures in Vail built in the last 10 years and there are not affordable to anyone the makes less 18 dollars and hour which most people under 30 don't. We have to start building structures higher than 3 or 4 stories. not much space left in vail. build more build higher. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG There need to be more options for young people, couples and families, TO BUY. Options in a lower price range than the Chamonix units. My husband and I make almost double the national average household income but we would barely be able to afford a Chamonix unit. There need to be more opportunities for apartments, and condos, like Vail Commons. On top of this, we need affordable housing for our seasonal workers. As a village based restaurant operator, we have had to get creative to make it through busy seasons with less staff. This includes managers working in the kitchen, a new POS system, and closing sections of our restaurant regardless of how busy we are. A lot of this leads to a diminished guest experience, which as we all know is the lifeblood of this town. June 18, 2019 - Page 210 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 26 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG There needs to be more deed restricted homes available for the year round blue collar workers. I would say "affordable" but that last time "affordable" housing was promised with the Chamonix project it wound up being an unattainable price for the majority of residents desperate for housing. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Vail needs to partner with Vail resorts to build and SELL affordable housing! NOT RENTALS-NOT selling$500- $650k+ homes to people that DO NOT LIVE HERE(Chamonix). I know for a fact that there are several home owners in Chamonix that are not fill time year round residence. Plus $499k for a 2bd/bath stack and shack is TOTALLY unacceptable! Give me a break! I literally was born at Vail Valley Medical center and work here and owning a home here is ABSOLUTELY out of the question due to poor management of funds by Town of Vail . We do not need to purchase more open space! Get a grip- take a page from the playbook of Aspen or Summit related to affordable housing- IT CAN BE DONE! FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG They need to step up and use some of the other properties they have for housing. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Ban short term rentals. Actually require affordable housing instead of adding more and more luxury. But you won't. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Charge second home owners a 2% sales tax that goes strictly towards housing. Also get Vail resorts to pay a real living wage. June 18, 2019 - Page 211 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 27 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I have lived here for close to 15 years and something has to be done for the people that can't afford to live here anymore but support those who can. I feel that Vail Resorts is not doing their part to address the needs of the people earning low wages who are addressing the needs of our well heeled guests. The town is also failing miserably in this regard. Ban short term rental profiteers in this town and county! If the town and resort expect to continue to uphold the experience and service Vail is known for, something drastic is long overdue to assist the locals that ensure the wheels are turning all year. Please help! Sincerely, priced out of Vail MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Make more available. Back in 2006 when they put Middle Creek up, everyone thought it was low income housing. What a joke. You don't get what you pay for. You pay out your ass. You have to have two working class jobs in this town or you will get nowhere. That alone is a problem. So build more, build higher, not wider, and actually make it affordable. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Offer lower rent options. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG The Vail Indeed program is a fantastic step, but I would like to see another "Chamonix " type development. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Increase number of deed-restricted homes to purchase or rent, available ONLY to people who WORK in Vail. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Really not sure what the answer is. Perhaps make affordable housing actually affordable for more people, unlike the Chamonix complex. Seems to me the people who could afford to buy there could probably, in many cases, afford to buy in the open market. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Yes FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG They should have more restrictions on the deed-restrictions. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG You tell me. June 18, 2019 - Page 212 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 28 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG If you want year-round service workers you must protect possible housing options for them. Town of Vail being a "Real Estate Investment" will only continue to grow with Colorado's ridiculous growth. Any protections to prevent future "ghost" homes are appreciated. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Look into a cap on short term listings in the outer areas of town. Mini houses. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG More (actual) affordable housing. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Not sure. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Please see response included in last question of the survey. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Yes, address. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG They should take the bull by its horns. They should dedicate every effort to finding local employees and resident housing no matter what the cost is, instead of focusing their efforts on renovating for entertainment and public areas. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I wish I knew how to have more affordable housing in Vail. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I would say less short-term rentals and more long-term rentals. If you buy a home, you shouldn't be living one week out of the year. They don't make housing affordable. I believe they are catering to the rich and not the locals. We need more affordable housing. What they consider affordable is not affordable. The so called housing available is the fire station. They consider housing prices at 420 to 750. That is affordable. I'm glad that they built that housing there. Half a million dollars is not considered affordable housing. Also rent is out of control here. It is really crazy here, along these parts of the country. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Expand the Indeed program to include all of Eagle County. Build more affordable units that can be purchased instead of using them for rentals. Also more rental units available that can be lived in with no time limits how long an occupant can live there. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT AT ALL Buy some land in Eagle or Gypsum and build whatever you want, offer extended bus service. June 18, 2019 - Page 213 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 29 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT AT ALL For residents, nothing. However,if you meet seasonal residents, clearly there is more rental housing needed. FEMALE 65+OTHER OWN NOT AT ALL There is nothing. MALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN NOT AT ALL Town of Vail shouldn't be involved at all in housing issues. If business owners want employees to live in town, they should either provide housing themselves or raise wages to a level that employees can afford rents. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL There is no shortage of homes; I think what you mean to say is "affordable homes." It is a valley however and there will be certain constraints as a result. If people want to work here they may need to commute from Eagle, which many people do. It is not the town's responsibility to subsidize housing. The work the town is doing is only increasing density and lowering the quality of life for those who are already here. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL Town of Vail should NOT be involved in the ?shortage of available homes. Town of Vail is not a communist state and should leave the free market to function by itself. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL Town of Vail should not build anymore employee housing in Vail. It's NOT a Town of Vail problem. It's a Vail Resorts problem. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL Vail is too big already. The problem is not shortage of housing, it is too many people. Do not encourage more growth or more people moving here. If more housing is provided more people will move here. Town should stay out of the housing business. Biggest problem is in winter, get rid of the Epic pass and the demand for short term rentals will be reduced, turning them back into long term rentals. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL They should not do anything in terms of market value and the market for housing. I committed most of my life's work for this. There is plenty of land for this. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL Build a Miller Ranch project only for Vail workers 20 hours a week minimum in Eagle. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL Stay out of the housing business. June 18, 2019 - Page 214 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 30 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL This is not the Town's problem. Every time we subsidize housing, we let large corporations like VRI, 4 Season, etc., off the hook. They need the employees, let them pay for it. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL Better transportation and development of housing in the communities west of Vail. Business owners should invest on housing for their employees, not citizens. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT NOT AT ALL Master plan west vail, encourage density increase across the board. don't approve stupid high density cluster that will never get built like the failed project on the Roost lodge site. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH I think we should lean hard on Vail Resorts to help provide housing. We have lots of aging property in town, they could buy and redevelop them with higher density units. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH I think they've been doing a great job! FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH Do not over-develop at the expense of destroying the culture and feel of Vail Village. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH Large hotels and Vail Resorts have a failing business model of paying their employees less than is necessary to live on. Their business model has a bedrock principle that they will get the community to pay to support their businesses' employees housing. The Town of Vail and the citizens should not be supporting this failed business model. Most of the employees of these businesses could much more easily live in communities such as Eagle-Vail. The next thing that is going to happen is that Eagle County is going to propose some type of affordable housing Tax, why should Vail potentially have two taxes on it? The Town of Vail has no business in providing housing. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH We need to keep the character of our town. More housing = more congestion, less wildlife, more parking problems. Eventually less visitors June 18, 2019 - Page 215 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 31 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH The Town of Vail should consider what the limit is on its capacity to support additional residents with additional infa structure. Instead of housing in Vail itself, the Town of Vail should work with eagle county to create affordable housing in the county. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH Not a damn thing. Let the market provide a solution. The town will only makes things worse for everyone. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH Subsidizing Town of Vail employee housing with taxpayer money is fine. But absolutely not for private businesses, including hotels, hospital and Vail Resorts! Housing can be privately funded down valley and utilize tax funded buses, or like the Sonnenalp, provide intown housing by employers. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH Think valley wide. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH I think we should keep it just as it is because we would get overpopulated so fast. It would make our heads swim. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Nothing! Tell people to look for homes down valley. MALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Keep moving forward with the InDEED program. Maybe provide some tax relief for full time residents that own a place that is not in the InDEED program. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Why do anything? We can not manufacture space. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Feel town should not be landlords unless for town employees. Responsibility and cost should be employers concern and too much importance/dollars are being used by town for housing needs. Let those employees should decide where they want to live and adjust their lifestyle to make ends meet. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH I do not think that the town should be funding housing for Vail Resorts, the big hotels and Vail Health by any means. They should provide funding for their employee housing. They should have been accountable for that before the projects were approved. I also believe that we should be addressing more seasonal employee housing without a years lease as many people come to work for a season. June 18, 2019 - Page 216 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 32 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH The town of Vail should get out of the real estate business. They should not be involved in selling and buying real estate properties in the municipality. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Develop any needed programs with private industry and remove the Town of Vail from development and becoming property owners. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH It is not the Town of Vail 's responsibility to tax taxpayers for housing....for employees other than Town of Vail employees. Employers can band together and build housing as a consortium rather than begging taxpayer to subsidize their low wages and businesses. And not all housing has to be in Vail. Land is at a premium here and more affordable options are available within 10 miles. Commuting some number of miles is not unusual in America. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH I'll come back to this question. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Town of Vail should not be involved in housing availability. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH Nothing MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH There is very little that can be done to provide affordable housing within the town limits of Vail proper. Demand for vacation resort homes is high and there are very few areas left to build. All solution are located further down the valley where land is cheaper. Then the town and Vail Resorts can provide bus service. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH I think the Town has done more than enough for affordable housing. It is time to let the market place take over again. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH They should not build any more projects like they did at the west end of town for the doctors and lawyers. They shouldn't build anything on the 12th Fairway of the Vail golf course. They shouldn't build the East Vail project either. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH There needs to be low cost employee housing. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Town of Vail shouldn't do anything. The pricing and availability of housing is governed by market forces. Trying to influence that market always leads to a waste of money. June 18, 2019 - Page 217 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 33 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Encourage deed restrictions for employee housing units. These units should not be subsidized by any other means. Once the EHU deed restriction is in place, let the market set the rate. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Vail is an expensive market with limited land supply. While some lower income homes can be build, I would suggest such projects are best situated in Intermountain, north West Vail, or down valley. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH I think Town of Vail has enough housing.......not realistic to provide more affordable housing in Vail. Affordable housing isn't realistic in Town of Vail , due to the real estate costs. Think it's best to provide affordable housing in EV, Avon, etc. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH The burden of housing has been on the backs of the taxpayers. The business community needs to step up to address THEIR problem. I am totally against MY Vail tax dollars being used to build any housing outside of Vail. Eagle county as a whole needs to build housing outside of Vail. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Buy up housing and develop out side the city limits of Vail. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Nothing. Too much subsidy now. Go down valley if necessary MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Town of Vail should worry about housing their OWN employees. Not providing housing for, "for profit business". FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Make short term rentals in residential areas harder. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Yes, but must collaborate with all towns up and down the valley. This is not a Vail problem only, it is an Eagle County problem. Joint purchase of a large parcel mid-valley. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH The marketplace is currently correcting. Massive building in Edwards, Eagle and Gypsum. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Vail is landlocked. Affordable homes are nearby, but transportation is required. The Town should to make transportation more efficient for people who work in town but can't afford the high prices of Vail housing. June 18, 2019 - Page 218 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 34 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED REFUSED NOT TOO MUCH The Town of Vail is placing too much emphasis on low-income house in Vail. I have had to commute for work for as long as I can remember. People who work in Vail do NOT NEED to live in Vail as a necessity. Yes, it is VERY nice to live in Vail, but my husband and I have made many sacrifices to be able to live in Vail. The Town of Vail could be much better served by looking at options to transport low-income workers from down Valley - more affordable living locations, as opposed to cramming more housing in already crowded areas. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT NOT TOO MUCH There are housing opportunities outside of Vail in the Valley, which has excellent public transportation options. Would hate to see the town put up a bunch of housing/apartments. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN REFUSED I will not vote in favor or any more employee housing unless Vail updates its numbers policy for people in long term housing, especially with a restriction for no more than 2 unrelated renters. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN REFUSED It's always been hard to one housing. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED If you work in Vail you should be provided with an eco pass. This town has become too expensive for the people who run it. More frequent and free transportation so people can get to town. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED They should limit second homeowners from owning homes in the Vail Valley. They should make homes affordable for blue-collar workers. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT There should be more housing around Minturn, Avon and Edwards. It is more spread out around there. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Lessen the gap between cost of living and wages. Put some of the burden back on the employers- especially the big ones, hotels, VR, ect. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Don't build in East Vail. That is the worst idea. Build in Avon, Eagle Vail, Edwards. Tax payers should not be footing the bill for VR employee housing. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Increase free transportation down valley where there is more available housing. June 18, 2019 - Page 219 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 35 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT If the Town can assist with more housing, I think they should continue to do so. The existing programs should be continued. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Within the town of Vail, there is no need for the creation of any additional hotel or rental property. Seasonal workers can be housed in existing long term rental propoerty or housed down valley. Instead all remaining property within the town boundaries should be rezoned for local residential use. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Remodel existing compounds to provide housing to workers. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT They should sell housing in Down Valley. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Continue to purchase land and build deed restricted homes for locals. More affordable price point preferable. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Give developers tax breaks, to build affordable housing. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Integrate small workforce housing projects into all neighborhoods. Do not work with developers who propose large projects that could be made available to employees who do not work within the town of Vail. Scale down projects that will eradicate wildlife. Plan for projects in the eagle vail/ Avon areas where land is more available. Use Town funds to pay for employee housing. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Should not institute a new tax. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT They need to cooperate with other communities. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Identify locations mid valley i.e. Minturn, Magnus, Lindholm West Vail property, Eagle Vail for employee housing and transit center and reduce he excessive squeeze for Vail housing. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT I don't know. That is why we have the council. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT I don't have an answer to that. I'm not certain what the answer is. FEMALE REFUSED DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Even with housing developed, the rents are so high that those needing housing can't afford what is offered. FEMALE REFUSED DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Just a good thing to look in to… FEMALE 35-44 OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT All 2nd home owners be fined if they don't sublet a lock off. June 18, 2019 - Page 220 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 36 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT Be careful on your involvement. We are a resort community not a normal town. Don't institute policies that discourage investment. Rich people vote with their feet and don't come back. FEMALE 65+OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT I don't think they should do anything. I don't think it is their place to be in the housing business. MALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Tax second home owners to pay to create a quality community that all will enjoy. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT I do not think Town of Vail should mandate this issue. It has always been an issue and will always continue to be so. Same goes with Manhattan, San Fransico and many parts of the world. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT I don't think that they should do anything. It is a free market. It is fine. MALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Market forces have always driven the problem. More supply is not always the right answer but perhaps subsidies that allow locals to buy is one way. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT It's not the governments job to provide housing. I don't think it's in our charter. If you do do housing, be inventive - no cars so no need for parking and contributes to the green idea. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Town of Vail should listen to all residents of Vail re: the problem of housing availability--not just to the VLHA, VR, Vail Health, and the local business community. It is a problem that needs to be addressed-- but not at the expense of further degrading open space, wildlife habitat, what little is left of our "small town" feel and the environment. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT I think that building dormitory type buildings for seasonal workers would free up condos, apartments, etc. for residents. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Use Sonnenalp new employee housing as a model, involving Vail Resorts and Vail Health as prime employers. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Do you mean homes or work force housing? There is a BIG difference ! Residents or non-residents ? FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I don't have enough information at this time. June 18, 2019 - Page 221 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 37 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Provide incentives for owners to rent long term to locals, not short term for the bigger buck. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT They should not take away the animal habitat. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I think if you got all property managers together that own rental properties and live full-time in the valley to bring a pool of beds together to see how we can work together to make sure people have a place to stay. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT This is the responsibility of the business community. Let VR take the lead and spend some of their 34 M. The Town of Vail should focus on housing for their own employees. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Continue to do what you are doing. Look for housing options and pursue them. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Look at available housing that could be converted to employee housing. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT What happened to Ever Vail? Vail Resorts should continue to fund employee housing, not the tax payers of Town of Vail. No one seems to understand the huge annual profits that Vail Resorts collects every year yet somehow the tax payer or visitors (by way of a resort fee) should fund housing for VR? Really? MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Keep working at acquiring properties to sell as deed restricted units, if possible make those units affordable. Partner with private enterprise to help make them affordable. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Town of Vail should support Town of Vail developers, not out of state developers on housing initiatives. They should look a existing parcels such as the E.Vail proposed site and look to do a land swap with US GOV. in another more discreet and un-impacted area to place housing. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Public private cooperation in building affordable housing and cooperation with communities in the county. Vail cannot support this alone it needs to work with the county and the major employers to resolve this issue. I do not support a property tax. June 18, 2019 - Page 222 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 38 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT They should build more housing. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Be open to all options, including zoning, financing, etc. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Continue on the current path. There has always been a housing problem and there always will be. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Should not increase taxes whatsoever, whether sales tax or property tax. Propose a bond issue. The 1000 unit goal is over zealous and most likely unattainable. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Vail should not give tax money to partially finance the purchase. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Work with realtors to compile a list of available properties. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Yes along with Vail Resorts and the hospital. FEMALE REFUSED REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I agree with converting existing structures to deed-restricted housing. I do not agree with the development of open spaces and the vacant lands which make Vail special and welcoming to humans and animals. We must be good stewards of the land. I also agree with requiring new developments/hotels to include employee housing units. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Zone certain areas for STR and regulate them to make sure they are up to the Vail brand for hospitality. All other units should be used as affordable LTRs. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I don't know too much about it. They have more housing available in West Vail now. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT The deed program has been very effective. There are more affordable options for people who work in the town of Vail. Also, I believe it is also important for people to purchase in the free market and for people who want to invest in the Town of Vail. I would like to see a program that helps first-time and young home buyers get into the free market, and otherwise some sort of assistance that can help them or support them. June 18, 2019 - Page 223 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 39 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Incentivize land and property owners to build, expand or redevelop properties that might allow for more units. Don't require property owners to put in EHUs. Don't allow builds that devalue current properties or neighborhoods. Look at expanding on the land Vail Public Works sits on. EverVail? FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Not let foreigners purchase properties over locals. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Should not develop the east Vail parcel owned by Vail resorts. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Sorta - this should also be the responsibility of the businesses and especially Vail Resorts. They should have develop their own housing for their own employees, instead of giving it Triumph and the town to do with tax payers money. No more excuses from VR on why they cannot retain employees to keep the lifts, Adventure Ridge, and Vail Mountain F&B open. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT You're doing it. Building more on town land. Offering an amazing discount for those homes. Indeed plan. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I don't have an answer. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT As everyone knows housing has always been an issue. Housing shortage and Housing affordability have always been issues In Eagle, Summit, Pitkin, Routt, etc. Counties for as long as anyone can remember. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Continue on track with a housing plan, building multi unit housing when land is available and allotting units for rent / own when developing large projects. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Limit short-term rentals. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Promote, encourage living wages. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Should NOT plan on building affordable housing in the town itself. June 18, 2019 - Page 224 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 40 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT We need to figure out a way to provide more seasonal rentals for the employees that come to Vail for the winter season to work on the mountain and in the village businesses. Most of these young workers do not want to buy anything. They want to rent for 6 months or less and be able to come back for a few seasons. This is a very small resort town and the land is expensive. It does not make sense to keep building on every available piece of land so more people can live here. There are plenty of options down valley and we have a great bus system to transport people to Vail. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT They convert public lands. There are more deed-restricted homes. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Collaboration between all the communities from East Vail to Gypsum. Invest in transit. It is unrealistic to assume land locked Vail can or should solve the housing shortage. Vail is the economic engine of the corridor so providing affordable and reliable transit to and from jobs will be required. Look for large available parcels of land mid valley that can provide higher density housing. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Housing is a big issue, however one thing to keep in mind is how long term rental tenants interact and treat property owners. Can be a bit contentious when renters do not have any thought or care about the upkeep of property. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Town should not continue to build larger homes (like those in West Vail) to accommodate families with 2-car garages. Density and number of small units must be increased! Problem is that people will make these a lifetime home as opposed to thinking about upgrading when it is financially viable and make room for a new generation. The point is, these should not be permanent housing solutions for locals. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Coordinate efforts to develop and grow residential affordable housing between Vail and Avon, working together with other communities. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Create a block of rent-controlled apartments/townhomes in various multi-unit buildings throughout Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 225 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 41 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT The Town should NOT subsidize housing for big employers who are growing each year but are not taking responsibility for their housing needs. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Town of Vail should NOT support more high density within its town limits. Vail, as a resort experience, is popular and successful because of its low density charm. Over building by increasing density will ruin the charm which has made Vail successful. Vail should invest in improving transit up and down the valley. Employees needed access but don't need to live within walking distance of Vail Mountain. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Vail Health should address the shortage of housing caused by their 'non-profit' non tax paying empire. Town of Vail with only 5,000 residents and limited available land should not be responsible for subsiding housing for the Vail Health employees. The size of Vail Heath skews all the numbers. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Allow developers to build more units get rid of the gfra rules. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Continue to provide for employee rate controlled housing. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Ease restrictions. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Kill Our Bighorn Sheep!! MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT The town can build REAL affordable housing in partnership with Vail Resorts and not tax the locals. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT You can not fix this, as long as we keep growing we will never have all the housing you need. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I think what they are doing now is great. They should continue what they are doing. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT 1) Make it more difficult for homeowners to short term rent their properties. 2) Develop housing only on a public/private partnership. Perhaps develop an employee housing project on the defunct Marriott property and sell the units to local businesses on an at-cost basis. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Build in Minturn and develop another road other than 1-70 into Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 226 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 42 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I don't think the Town should be a landlord, but they need to be a partner with planning and zoning, making it attractive and feasible for investors or private individuals to provide and maintain employee housing. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT They should smoothen the roads to help the developers. I would prefer more private than public developers. If indeed the town provides incentives or helps with red tape, I would prefer that it stays with the private citizens of Vail. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT They should collaborate with the county to build houses. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Are these year around residents or just seasonal? MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Be very careful about AirBnB - Enforce the caretaker unit so they are used. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Contine to back the private sector including Vail Resorts in building employee housing. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Create housing west of the Town of Vail where there is more open space. Creating housing within the Town of Vail is starting to ruin neighborhoods. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Do not spend money to subsidize residences that cost more than $400,000. People that can qualify for that level of financing do not warrant subsidies. Ok to subsidize lesser properties for hourly workers. Employee housing should mainly be a private sector responsibility. The Tiwn lets the private sector off the hook if the Town provides employee housing. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Encourage the development of affordable housing. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT It's too late! We are now a tourist town and there is not enough money to provide affordable housing...and, $550,000 for a two bedroom, one car condo is not affordable!! Get real. The opportunity was long ago. June 18, 2019 - Page 227 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 43 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT This, and the preceding questions, are badly biased, because using the term "residents", presumes that the only solution for Vail employee housing shortages must be in Vail. I believe that housing in Vail should only be subsidized by government for people who MUST be able to come to work in Vail if I-70 is closed. All other subsidized housing should be down valley, simply because it's much cheaper to build there. A county wide housing authority, or something similar, must be developed. Transportation is an obvious issue, but addressing it should be a part of the task of the housing authority. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Use the existing tools where appropriate, ie inclusionary zoning. But I feel the Town should participate in regional solutions where there is a greater bang for the buck in the housing market. I do not believe that the current approach, like zoning questionable parcels that impact wildlife or have other problems are the solution. The fact is that land within the town is expensive. There are numerous potential sites close by in Avon, Magnus Lindholm's parcels for example where more housing could be built at a fraction of the cost in Vail. Granted transportation would need to be part of the solution as well, but I think there are many more opportunities to be explored in the areas adjoining the town, than some of the half baked projects like the East Vail Bighorn Sheep winter range. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No additional property tax to the residents. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Possibly charge a very high fee to individual homeowners who are VRBO -ing their second home or their primary residence. This housing problem has always existed-lack of homes and condos. It was this way in the 70s & 80s when we were finally able to buy a fixer-upper. Vail Resorts needs to take on a much larger role in solving the housing shortage. It's this way all over the US-the ocean resorts & cities have this same housing problem. People could move to NEBRASKA - their ads are on TV every day. June 18, 2019 - Page 228 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 44 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED SOMEWHAT Raise property taxes on second and third homeowners who drain the resources of town but do not contribute measurably through sales taxes as they are rarely here. MALE 45-54 REFUSED REFUSED SOMEWHAT A percentage of some areas kept for locally employed full time residents. MALE REFUSED REFUSED REFUSED SOMEWHAT The Town needs to up the property tax. There are multi million dollar homes throughout Vail, but they are not taxed at the appropriate rate to generate a better return for the Town and its employees. It seems to me, that the Town is more interested in appeasing the people that live here 1 month out of the year than they are their own people that are here full time. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT They could have more lands available for housing. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT Increase subsidized employee housing. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT Maybe there will be extended building projects. They need larger or more properties built in the valley. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT The biggest employer here is Vail Resorts... why can't they take some ownership in this matter and maybe build their own employee housing or pay their employees a living wage? (I work for VR...) FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT Offer more classes on budgeting. If residents learned to budget, they would have an easier time affording the housing that is available. Build a no-frills high density apartment complex on the north side of 70 that is at least 6 stories high and offers parking underground. If it's on the north side of 70, it's not blocking anyone's views so why not build tall. There are plenty of amenities in town- a housing unit does not need a dog park, playground, swimming pool, tennis court, etc. Focus on 1-bedroom units, hotel style. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT They should make more housing for employees of the city of Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 229 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me what you think the Town of Vail should or should not do to address the shortage of available homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 45 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT I think the bigger problem is lack of affordable housing. It has become hard for companies to retain staff and pay them enough to afford housing without taking on stress as a business. More housing options would help as with more supply the demand goes down and hence the cost of rent. I think more deed restrictions could play a role as well in limiting the number of vacation homes sitting empty the majority of the year. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT Build affordable housing that is actually affordable. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT More employee housing, restrictions on pricing, and restrictions on secondary homeowners. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT They are already doing a good bid and have a lot at works. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT Working regionally should be done with consideration to transit and parking. June 18, 2019 - Page 230 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 1 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG One where the value can only increase by a certain % each year to keep the housing continuously affordable. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A deed-restricted home to me means that you cannot sell it for a profit. It is a trap. I wouldn't buy real estate, if I can't make a profit. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG It is any housing restriction or reserved for an Eagle County full time employee. Deed restricted can also put a cap on the resale value of some of these homes. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Selling a home for a price lower than its value so it can be affordable. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG It is a home that is being controlled on the pricing for buying and selling and its availability to specific residents. This is where I live now. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A home that requires the occupants to live and work in the area that cannot be rented out and must be their primary residence and has restrictions on how much sale price or rent can increase. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Affordable or "attainable" housing that restricts appreciation to keep costs down. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Deed restricted home is a way for long term locals with limited funds to own a home in the Vail valley. There is a cap on the sale price to keep the buying price "affordable" for those people FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG It can only be bought/sold to someone who qualifies for the restrictions that are put in place. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG They are homes that have certain requirements on who can live in them or how much they can be appreciated over time. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A home that has a deed restriction on buying, owning, or selling. June 18, 2019 - Page 231 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 2 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG I think they're great if you start low enough to get in. I've been in deed restricted housing for 11 years and now have enough equity to purchase on the open market. This would not have happened for me with out the program. The current new deed restricted housing starting at $500k missed the mark though. That is way to much to start at. They may have to look a little less fancy and maybe cheaper interiors, but I think $250k - $300k would have hit the people we want to stick around and make lasting careers here. People that can afford $500+ can already afford to get into the open market in this valley. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Must live/work in the valley. Can not be a second home either. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A "deed restricted home" would be a lower cost home that the owner is not allowed to sell for a profit. And when they do it must be filled by another full-time working resident in the area. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A home that someone who works in the Valley 30+ hours/week can purchase. Or, someone who has employees who meet the 30+ hours a week can purchase an put employee in it. Or, someone can purchase and rent to those who work 30+ hours a week in the Valley. In the InDeed program, there is not a cap on appreciation of the home. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Deed restricted home are either existing units or new units that are sold below market rate to local residents. Often a lottery system is used for new projects. Owners must live and work year round in the county, if the owner wants to rent their home the tennants must meet the same qualifications and the lease must be no kess thab 30 days. Deed restrictions limit the appreciation that a property can experience and buyers must meet the above mentioned qualifications FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Depends on the deed restriction. But in Vail there are some based solely on working in Eagle County. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Limits amount home price can go up and who can purchase and live in the home. June 18, 2019 - Page 232 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 3 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG One that can only appreciate at a nominal rate, thus keeping overall value and price lower than market. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Well, I live in one, so it means that there is a restriction on the ownership or use of the home. And in the case of what the VLHA does, it means that the restriction requires the owner or renter to be a local employee. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A deed-restricted home is a place for a local worker to live. The town subsidizes that home in some way and places restrictions on who can live there based on where they work. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A home that is lower in price for locals that will achieve minimal appreciation. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Creating a new market. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Deed restricted homes are usually sold at a lower cost, then upon resale you are limited to a 2% or 3% sale increase, regardless of market situation. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A home that has a limited increase in value and sold to Town of Vail residents or workers. But, I know many "deed restricted home" are now owned by Denver residents and by successful Town of Vail business owners which makes it hard for others with lower income to qualify through the lottery. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Home only appreciates a certain percentage per year, not based on fair market value or open market. Keeps it "affordable." MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A good thing. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A home that is restricted to being purchased by someone living and working within Vail or Eagle County and often has a limit placed on it's resale appreciation value to be somewhat close to inflation. Good as stops housing getting too expensive too quickly like Pitkin Creek did. Downside is owners may get stuck as equity they build up is limited to this amount and what they pay off in the mortgage. Not so bad if they're not planning on speculating and have options of a bigger deed restricted house if they get a family. June 18, 2019 - Page 233 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 4 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A home which has its resale value limited. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Any restriction that modifies the deed effecting the ownership or us of the property. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Legal document that puts restrictions on private property such as occupant requirements or appreciation caps. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A home that can only be sold for a certain amount depending on purchase price. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A residence where Appreciation is capped to a certain percentage set in the deed at time of transfer. This cap has been agreed to by builder or owner before sale in response to an amount paid by Town of Vail &/or VLHA to builder/owner for selling/deed restricting the property for less than the market value at present or foreseen at a future sale. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG An original controlled selling price with restrictions on allowed increase in resale pricing. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Value can only go up by 3% a year, open to residents or employees of Town of Vail. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Deed-restricted homes mean that the prices of the homes cannot increase. It is not open to the usual forces of inflation. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG A covenant in a deed which limits the usage, sale price or some other restriction on the property. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Great idea. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Housing that has income and asset limitations on buyers. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG It requires the local resident to work in ECO a minimum of 30 hours per week and not use the resident as an investment! MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG One that must be occupied by residents working 30 hours or more in upper eagle valley, rental for not for less than 30 days. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG It means it can only be purchased or leased by a full-time employee in the town of Vail. It often means that if it is for purchase, the resale value is capped at a certain percentage per year. FEMALE 18-34 OTHER OWN BIG A deed-restricted home is limiting the types of people living in that residence. June 18, 2019 - Page 234 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 5 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 OTHER OWN BIG a "deed-restricted" home is a property that Town of Vail has limited how it can be used and how much it can appreciate. FEMALE 45-54 OTHER OWN BIG Stupid. Everyone knows someone who is cheating the program. I know of many I don't think government should be in the business of bidding against the little guy. Prices are instantly driven up as everyone knows the government has deep pockets. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN BIG Properties that are restricted via owner/resident qualifications, rules, and in some cases property capital appreciation caps. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN BIG I have no ideas. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN BIG A home that is owned but can only accrue a certain amount of increases value per year. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN BIG I know what a deed restricted is, I was in the housing lottery until I said the hell with you and purchased on the open market. Your problem is that rather than building more "affordable housing" before crisis hit you waited and are now in a position to be reactive rather than proactive. Big mistake. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN BIG Has to be primary residence, cannot be investment property. Will only gain a certain amount of value per year. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN BIG One that must be owned by a local and used by that person not as a rental. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG For sale at a restricted low price, and available to people that are employed within the town. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG Provide low income residents with housing. Have capped appreciation on the property. MALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG Agreement that restricts the use of the home in some way. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN BIG It limits the amount that the home can increase when goes back on the market. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN BIG Specific county employees can only buy and price appreciation is limited. June 18, 2019 - Page 235 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 6 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN BIG One that can be sold or rented only to local workers who meet specific criteria such as working at least 30 hours per week in Vail or Eagle County. Must be lived in by the worker, cannot be sub-letted. Usually an appreciation cap applies on for-sale units and the units must be the only property owned in Eagle County by the owner. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN BIG A unit has to be utilized in the manner that the deed states. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG A lower cost home (not necessarily "affordable") that has restrictions on the resale value to continue at the lower price. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Something I am not interested in because you can not buy a home like this as an investment and can never expect to make any money on it FEMALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG The sale of the property must be to a full time resident/employee or be used as a rental for a full time resident/employee. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG "Affordable" homes/condos that have limited capital gains if and when the owner sells. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG A "deed restricted home" is for town of Vail employees. Rent is a bit cheaper than non deed restrictions. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG A home that can only increase in value by a certain percentage each year. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG It is something that is set aside for a Vail employee who works more than 30 hours a week. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG A home that is restricted for occupancy by full time local residents vs 2nd home owners or short term renters. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Locals can purchase a dwelling and is limited in the amount of profit that is made if ever sold. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG I have no comments. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG A deed-restricted home is for anyone working in Eagle County. People who are working over 30 hours per week have the right to live in a deed-restricted home. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Home may only be sold to a buyer that meets certain income requirements. June 18, 2019 - Page 236 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 7 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG It can only be sold to certain residents who are full time residents of a said community. The resale price is capped and initial price is lower than free market. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Not 100 percent sure! FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG You cannot make money when you sell the house. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG A deed-restricted home means that it has restrictions when it comes to the residents who get to stay. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Deed restricted. As long as you are employed within the boundaries of the town of Vail . You should be able to live and purchase a deed restricted unit. You should not be able to sub lease or rent it out . the owner should live in that unit and work in the town. When you reach retirement age , you should be able to keep your unit. Again , no subleasing or renting it out. Then it becomes a circus with tenants in and out. You retire. it's still yours , and you live in it. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG One that can only be purchased by a locally employed full time resident with a certain income level and the property can only be sold to a similar buyer in the future at a certain level of price appreciation. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG The deed-restricted homes are offered to workers and people who live in Vail. They can purchase properties, but when they go to sell it, they earn no profits. It goes back into the pool. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Home built by or owned by the town, then sold with the restriction the price can not increase more than a pre set percentage per year. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Resale price capped. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG I don't know how to answer properly. MALE REFUSED REPUBLICAN OWN BIG A restriction that stays on the deed of the property that is set forth by the developer, local government, etc. The restrictions themselves can vary greatly. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG No vacation rental allowed, only full time workers can live there. June 18, 2019 - Page 237 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 8 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Typically there would be some appreciation cap that limits helps maintain reasonable purchase prices for those that can't afford "market" price on homes. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A deed restriction restricts who may live in the residence, renting opportunities, and resale opportunites. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A home that could be on the free market but isn't because it has been "deed-restricted" in order to temper the price and keep it as"affordable"as it can be for those living and working in the town of Vail. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Restricted either to be sold to people who work in Eagle County and/or a control on how much the house can increase in value per year. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG It has an appreciation tax and restrictions to who can live there. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Homes have restrictions, like real restrictions and profit margins. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A dwelling which has a cap set on appreciation, with caveat for capital improvements, which is available to those who work 30+ hours in Town of Vail. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A home that is restricted in it's use/occupancy. It varies based on the language in the deed restriction. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A property with encumbrances to the allowable use and occupancy. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG In Vail it is a home of various types where the town owns the land and the owner owns the structure. It can only increase in value at a predetermined percentage. The owner must work in Vail, must be their primary residence, and not own any other property in Eagle County. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG You need to work in the County full time, HOA is a must, fixed increase of home's value, must live there. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A deed-restricted home is a home that you can buy at reduced costs. It will not increase the possibility of having more than a certain percentage per year or beyond the percentage that is decided by the Local Housing Authority. June 18, 2019 - Page 238 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 9 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG It is a home that we can purchase and live in, can't rent, and can't resell to make a profit. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A "deed-restricted" home is a Vail"affordable"home. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Deed-restricted home is when you are only able to capitalize a percentage per year and not sell at market value. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Deed-restricted means that the value of the home cannot increase beyond a set percentage. I've heard that in Aspen "deed-restricted" homes are often not well-maintained. Why would someone invest in a property that cannot increase in value? it's a bad solution. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Homes that are designated for 30 hr per week employees who work and reside in Eagle County; re-sale is capped at a specific percentage. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Limited appreciation on the value of the house, AND/OR, limited to who can live in the house. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG One that ensures a locally employed worker (for a local company, not someone living here and working remotely) is living in the unit, which has an appreciation cap on resale, to keep prices "affordable" / lower than market. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A deed restriction can be very open or very narrowly constructed. For these purposes, one would think the Town would be creating deed restrictions that require residents of said units to work in the Town of Vail. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A home that has some limitation in place on the ownership and/or transferability of the property. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Bylaws governing the community which regulate homeowners and their property. Deed restrictions differ from HOA to HOA. Tell Us what the Town of Vail? Deed restrictions are exactly? MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Home restricted to local workers employed 30 hours per week. No income restriction no resale cap. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Limitations on ownership and capital appreciation. June 18, 2019 - Page 239 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 10 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Owner-occupied or longterm rental. Other restrictions such as appreciation cap, ownership of other property in the county, and must live and work in Eagle County may apply. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A home that is available to be purchased for less than market rate but with restricted appreciation. It also has other employment restrictions. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A home that is offered at below market value, to be owned, and restricted in use and sale. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A home whose occupancy and/or ownership is legally restricted to individuals with certain defined characteristics, typically residency, employment, or income. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A restriction that runs with the land which requires the occupant to reside in the home as their primary residence and work 30 hours per week in Eagle County. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Home that is dedicated to people who live here full time, year round. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Need to work in the Town of Vail with a 30 hour week minimum FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Restrictions that show what a home should be used for or not used for. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A partially subsidized home that a purchaser, meeting certain qualifications, can purchase for a more reasonable price but must meet and adhere to certain restrictions. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Anyone that wants to buy a deed restricted hm must work in the Vail valley at least ~30hrs/wk AND possibly has a limited upside on resale price. SO, you have to work 60+ hrs per week to afford a $500,000 place to live, plus homeowner assoc dues, plus utilities, plus, etc. Not realistic! MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG It is a home which has limitations on who is allowed to occupy it. If "deed-restricted" as an EHU, then the owner and future owners must honer the employee housing restriction. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG It means there are restrictions as to who can occupy/own the property and restrictions on how the property can appreciate in value for resale. June 18, 2019 - Page 240 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 11 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Local resident housing. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A unit that has conditions attached. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Not for re-Sale because you got a great deal. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG It is a home that is restricted to local residents of Vail. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A home that cannot exceed a certain value and cannot be available to the open market. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A "deed restricted home" is a reasonably priced home that appreciates in value by 3% annually. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG 3% or less return on home value. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A home or rental that is limited to occupancy by full time employees working in Eagle County. It also included price appreciation limited for sale housing with the same work restrictions. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG A "deed restricted home" is a home where there is a home owners association or someone in charge of the homes or community in a certain area. These homes have certain rules or regulations they must follow in order to live in this community. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG Where it's use and financial potential are regulated - for the good of the community - to remain "affordable" in perpetuity (or specified timeframe) in deeded language. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG Property w/govt ties that have set limits on future sales. MALE 35-44 REFUSED REFUSED BIG Where the price is low and the appreciation is capped. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG A home where the value can not skyrocket. Where you are mandated by law to sell under a ceertain price to maintain a fair housing market. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG A home with rules. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG When you buy a home that has to be regulated to a price when you sell it MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG No comment. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG A "deed-restricted" home has certain restrictions when buying or selling. IE: Must be a fulltime resident or employee of the area, or the home can only increase a certain percentage per year in selling. June 18, 2019 - Page 241 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 12 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG A home that must be occupied by a full-time resident (someone working in Vail 30+ hours per week). The homeowner receives a $$$ award for deed restricting their house. This doesn't put any caps on the market value or appreciation of the home. The landlord gets $$, the inventory of housing options theoretically increases, the tenant gets nothing. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG A home that?s ownership has certain requirements. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG A restriction that limits how much you can sell your home for each year, caps at a certain percentage rate. A restriction that may only full time Eagle County employees to qualify. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Deed-restricted is limiting the housing to a local resident who lives and works in Eagle County at least 75%. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG My understanding is that "deed-restricted" housing does not allow home owners the right to rent their property essentially eliminating the second home owner mentality. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG The home is bought at a lower price and the resale value is restricted going up in very small increments yearly. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It is a home where the mortgage owner has to rent it out and have a defined annual value increase. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG A home that cannot appreciate in value more than 2% a year, and that must also be sold to an Eagle County resident. I will hopefully be a first time home buyer in the valley this summer and from what I have heard the deed restricted program is out of money, not available with most apartments, and has potentially very negative other restrictions such as not being able to rent it out if you were to move or take a sabbatical. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Guidelines put into a deed that restrict how that land can be used. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It is a home that has a cap on the value the owner can sell the property for. June 18, 2019 - Page 242 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 13 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG One that has been purchased through a lottery at a discounted rate but the new owner is restricted on reselling the property to make profit. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Owner must work within the county, value of the home is restricted beyond the free market and can only appreciate at 3% annually. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It has limits as to how many years the owner must live in it themselves before they are able to rent it out themselves. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG A house that is owned by the town that can not be sold for a higher price than what the town has previously set. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG If you buy a home that is deed restricted, then the property value can only increase by a small amount each year. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It is a home that has a set point for the amount of income that they make and set point of rent. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It limits what an owner can or cannot do with their property. Similar to an HOA. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG There are multiple levels of deed restrictions, but in general it is designed too prevent second homeowners from buying them by requiring that you work and live here. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG 600k in west Vail! ?? FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG A home that cannot be sold without the buyer or tenant meeting some requirements. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Deed-restricted means that certain criteria is required to apply and there are also specific requirements when it is sold. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Only full time residents can live within deed restricted. Must work in Eagle Cty, there is a appreciation cap when selling, other covenants as well. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG You can buy it at a lower market price and when you sell it - which you don't have a choice who buys it - you do not make typical market profit. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It is one that is purchased at a certain price. You can't sell it at 3 percent per year. June 18, 2019 - Page 243 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 14 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It is a home that can be rented or sold to an Eagle Valley resident who lives and works here full time. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG It is a house or an apartment that can be bought for a certain price. MALE 18-34 OTHER RENT BIG A home that has certain restrictions placed on it, either type of occupancy or how it can be sold. MALE 18-34 OTHER RENT BIG A home to be purchased at a lower sales cost or with incentives (like down payment assistance) that can then only be sold with a certain % profit and maybe only to a full time resident. MALE 35-44 OTHER RENT BIG Not sure in the least bit FEMALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG Fixes appreciation property offered to employees or business owners only. FEMALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG Basically, they are restricted to sell that home. They can move on to something bigger and better. They may be restricted in how much they can sell it for. It depends on the restrictions and where they live. The guidelines are set up by the town codes. They are made from a collaboration of the town and the realtor. People who rent don't have voices or we get a shutout by the people who have more money than we do. They don't care about us. The appreciation on the home is restricted. It is a scam. We are getting locked in. There is nothing we can do about it. MALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG Certain rules apply. MALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG Community does not allow the property owner to do anything they want with, rent to whomever they want MALE 55-64 OTHER RENT BIG Limits how a property can be used and what can be built on it. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG A home that can not be sold for higher value than it was bought. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG Restrictions on what you can or cannot do with your property. Whether it's the ability to have a certain size fence or that you can only purchase a property if it's your primary residence June 18, 2019 - Page 244 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 15 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG The cost of the house does not become increased based on the surrounding homes/communities. The cost does not go up based on inflation. The home does increase in value over time but not at an inflated rate. MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG A "deed restricted home" is a home that is privately own but controlled by the holder of a deed. That holder controls the ownership of the home. MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG A home for a resident that works in Eagle County for 30+ hours a week. MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG A home where appreciation is only allowed a certain percentage each year. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT BIG In Vail - a residential property with an appreciation cap and specific requirements to ensure the property is used as a primary residence. A deed remains in place even if ownership changes. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT BIG It varies per contract. It must be your primary residence, you must work FT in that community, the cost remains lower and "affordable." FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED RENT BIG A situation that screws you. I make $120,000 a year, work my ass off, single parent, and cannot afford the homes/condos due to not having the $84,000 to put down. The HOA's are extremely high. I will not purchase a "deed restricted home" as it screws me by not allowing me to sell it for a reasonable price. I am now looking elsewhere to purchase that all my hard work goes into my home value. MALE 45-54 REFUSED RENT BIG The deed restricted housing is too expensive to be called "affordable." FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED RENT BIG It limits the use of the property. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED RENT BIG There is a limit on the amount amount you can make on a home and who you can sell a home too. MALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG The ability to provide a home at an"affordable"cost with a cap on increasing the value of your home. FEMALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG It is a home that is restricted on the amount you can buy or sell it for. June 18, 2019 - Page 245 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 16 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG I think it is a home that is only available to people who work 30 hours a week in Vail. There is a cap on the profit that they can make if they sell it to a Vail resident. It cannot be rented out through Airbnb and such. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG Only residents working in the town of Vail would be able to occupy the property. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG A home that the city of Vail ultimately owns but an individual can purchase if they are willing to buy certain rules such as the home's costs, only rising at 3% a year maximum. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG It is not market-based. It only increases by 2 to 3 percent a year. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG A home where you pay cheaper rent but don't get all the other options other home owners in the same area get. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG It is something you have to sell within the restrictions of the deed. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG The community has covenants and restrictions which pertain to homes and land. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A deed resticted home is one that you buy knowing that you can only rent it out to Vail residents. Housing value is based on a certain percentage. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A "deed restricted home" is a property with criteria set in the event of purchase that may include restrictions as to the amount of appreciation that may occur annuals or other requirements such as it must be occupied by someone who lives and works full time in the area. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A "deed restricted home" is an"affordable"option for a Town of Vail employee (30 hours or more) to purchase/rent home. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A home that has certain regulations in place to benefit our locals. One example may be that you have to be employed in Eagle County or the property cannot be rented short term. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Homes available for purchase for families in lower household income brackets; purchase prices are always controlled, and purchasers must meet additional requirements. June 18, 2019 - Page 246 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 17 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Housing that is being secured for local residents. There is a point system to which it operates under. How long you've lived in the area, where do you work, how long you've worked there. it's the more time you've lived here, if you work in in the county and town you receive more points. And people who have been here for 10 yrs are still on a list for housing. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Needs to be owned or rented to a person who works a minimum of 30 hours per week in Eagle County. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Not sure. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG One that is available only to people who live and work full time in Vail. Can be sold only to those people at a restricted profit. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It is when you can buy a place and you can't really sell it for an inflated price. You probably can get small amounts of money back, but can't flip it right away. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It is a home that limits the amount and types of occupants who can be in the house. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG 1 year lease MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A "deed-restriction" refers to a list of rules governing what you can and cannot do on your property. Not to be mistaken, however, with an HOA. Somewhat similar, but different. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A "deed restricted home" is any unit that has a limitation placed on the deed. There are a bunch of different types. It could be market capped or have some sort of use restriction on it. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A home where the deed is restricted. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Any type of residential deed that restricts the use of the property. In this case largely to provide "affordable" local housing for people who live and work in Vail. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It is a home where you must live and work in the county. June 18, 2019 - Page 247 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 18 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A home"affordable"to the blue collar worker, not a home that aligns with the exorbitant inflation of the area. It also should only be allowed to be purchased by a year round resident who actually needs the housing. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A home that is restricted to buyers/occupants who work in the Town of Vail a minimum of 32 hours per week, or are able to prove that 75% of their income comes from a Vail based business. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Basically an "affordable" but cheap duplex that the buyer is unable to make any money off of when they sell. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Limited number of homes offered to full time-year round residents that work in Eagle County a minimum of 30 hours per week. Lottery system...I believe that a set amount of equity can be gained yearly. 3% deed restricted meaning restricted to whom can purchase the home and how much equity can be gained yearly. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It is only available to certain residents. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A house with a 3% market cap, available to people that live/work in the county for over 30 hrs a week. Other restrictions including not being able to rent it out. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A house with certain requirements of ownership. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It is a contract that restricts the availablity of using your own property for a variety of things that don't fall into the "town's politicians" idea of what the town should be. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG No idea. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Properties that have an assigned appreciation cap designed to keep them "affordable" and to discourage investors from flipping them. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG This is a home that is required to stay below a certain percentage of appreciation yearly and if rented, must be offered at a fair rate to local county workers. NEED MORE! FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Appreciation and buyers are restricted/limited to keep housing "affordable" and available to residents of Vail/Eagle County. June 18, 2019 - Page 248 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 19 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I think it should mean that only people who can show need to live here - because we work here and need "affordable housing" - can purchase the home. I don't think the lottery should allow people to participate who have tons of money already and can afford to buy houses here already, or to buy homes for their kids to live in, etc. Working people need first dibs... so there should be checks to make sure the people buying / living there actually fit the description. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Restricted to those who work at least 32 hours in Town of Vail and appreciation is limited to 3% annually. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It is a housing unit that is sold for an appropriate price and cannot be sold until two to five years later. There will be a restricted price. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It is a house that you buy and can't sell. It goes up at a very small rate. As far as being horrible to the people who are living here, it isn't even close. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A "fair value" housing opportunity which are great for year-round residents. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A home deed that restricts what the owner can do with their property. For example, this could be a restriction on how much the owner can make on his/her property annually or who the owner can sell to upon the sale of the property. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A home with limited upside and downside. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Making available a dwelling to one who meets certain financial conditions. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Not sure. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Understand I'm familiar. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A deed-restricted home is a home where the value of the home is capped every year to a certain percentage and is a home for low income residents. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A home that has a set appreciation value based on a government index and not market forces. June 18, 2019 - Page 249 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 20 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG A deed-restricted home is can't be rented out. The town has paid them money so that they can't rent it out. The town has paid them some money so that when they go to sell the house, they are limited to what they can sell it for. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It is a property that has had certain restrictions on its deed that can do any number of things. (ie. limit its resale value, limited its appreciation, limit who can live there, limit the time it can be resold.) Really its whatever the owners of the property says he want the deed restriction to imply. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT AT ALL Deed restricted housing limits what the land can be used for and what can be built there. In Vail's case it means restricting the housing to low income earners. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT AT ALL Deed contains restrictions, that in this context means restricted by income. FEMALE 65+OTHER OWN NOT AT ALL That is a limitation on ownership to benefit the price. MALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN NOT AT ALL A "deed restricted home" limits who can live in a particular unit (usually a resident of Town of Vail or Eagle County in our particular case). It also artificially limits the appreciation one can realize from an investment. This is a largely unforeseen consequence of home ownership in a"deed-restricted"unit. Taking out a loan at 4-6% and only being able to make 3% on your deed restriction guarantees a loss for the buyer. This loss may be offset by increasing rent...which only further exasperates the housing "problem." MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL A "deed restricted home" is a way to provide housing for people who work in Vail. These people like to complain about housing-But the majority of them don't want to live in Vail anyway. They?re having families and want to live down valley where families live. Again, not a Town of Vail problem. Every resort town has this issue. You don't see Aspen or Telluride building "affordable"housing"right in the middle of town. They put money into an"affordable"bus service. June 18, 2019 - Page 250 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 21 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL A home that can only be purchased by certain people, in this case based on where they live or work. Also typically restricted by the annual increase in value. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL A home that is not available on the free market and is restricted to whatever the deed states. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL Rules determine who may buy the house. Sale price of the home is only allowed to increase a designated amount annually from the purchase price. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL The homes cannot be used for any purpose at all. It causes the inability for seasonal workers to use the homes for any reason. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL Can only be sold to Eagle County full time residents who work in Eagle County at a discount and price can only rise a cost of living index per year. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL Requires occupant to work within the town and owner can only rent to a qualified occupant. Appreciation is capped. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL Restriction on sales and use guidelines. Caps re-sell price to set percentage and potential buyers qualifications. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL A home that must be occupied by someone working in Eagle County for 30 hours a week. The town gives compensation to the homeowner who deed restricts his property. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT NOT AT ALL A restriction on the deed that restricts who may live in the unit, appreciation caps (type 1), etc. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH It places constraints on the property. Any or a combination of price, value appreciation, buyer, purpose, or occupant criteria. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH A home that can only be sold to a certain person. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH This pertains to restrictions placed on a property such as who can buy/sell that property, time period placed on the property before it can be bought/sold, etc. June 18, 2019 - Page 251 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 22 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH A deed restriction is simply a contract. In the context of a home in Vail it is a contract between a property owner and the Town of Vail. The contract states the terms a restricted home may be used and the enforcement mechanism. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH One designated for local residents with limited income. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH It is supposed to be "affordable housing" for those who qualify under the specific program. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH Dunn investment. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH Just as it reads, one has restrictions on selling. To whom and for what amount. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH Property where the limits on future appreciation is controlled and the class of permitted owners or occupants is limited by the town. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH I have no responses on that. I do not know. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A home to be purchased, owned and loved in by someone who works IN Eagle County. The purchase price is "affordable" and later on, the increase in price to sell the house is limited to a small percentage....NOT market value. MALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A residence that is either capped on appreciation over time or a residence that is dedicated to employees who work in the town boundaries or Eagle County a certain number of hours. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Home can only be sold for so much. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A residence that is deemed to be owned or rented under the Town of Vail directives and kept as home for residents or Vail employment with guidelines as to cost or residence by Town of Vail. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH You have to be an Eagle County Resident to obtain the housing. I believe it should be limited to employees in the Vail Area not the whole county. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A deed-restricted home is a home that is solely used by an employee of Eagle County. It is a home that is solely being used or rented by an employee in Eagle County, Colorado 365 days a year. It should be a full-time year-round employee. June 18, 2019 - Page 252 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 23 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH The program with its undisclosed long term costs and lack of an exit strategy to end the deed restriction or reprice the properties without total disclosure and transparency to the public. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Where qualified buyer can only earn so much when reselling the home and home needs to be sold to Eagle County resident. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A ripoff for the tax payer and a scam for the buyer. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Deed restrictions can regulate what color you can paint your house, what landscaping is required. It can restrict parking of a motor home or boat on your property. It can require employment in town or have income requirements. It can limit appreciation. Whatever the seller wants to limit and what someone is willing to agree to. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH A home that can only appreciate a set amount of a specific timetable, meant to encourage locals to stay in there home. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH A home that?s the value increase are limited to inflation plus improvements. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH It must be sold to an eligible resident (employee) if it is resold. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH It is a home that requires a minimum down payment and a cap on the appreciation over a period of time. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH It is a home for employees of Vail Valley who spend more than 30 hours a week. As a result, they get a break on the cost of the house, but they are restricted in selling the house. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A home that has restrictions on its sale and the gain that can be realized. They are generally developed with wasteful incentives from the government. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A "deed-restricted" home is one where use of the property is limited by a restriction recorded against the deed. In Vail's case, the subject property must be occupied by a person working in Eagle County at least 30 hrs/week. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH In this case a property with a deed that restricts it occupancy to someone who lives and works in Eagle County for at least 30 hour per week. June 18, 2019 - Page 253 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 24 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Deed restrictions, often called are restrictions contained in a deed that limit how a property can be used and what can be built on it. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Restriction on the sale of property. Only someone meeting the "town guideline" of employee can repurchase the property. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A unit that is restricted for persons that meet the employee criteria and have an appreciation cap on resale. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH No comment. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Get the house cheaper now and give up the upside gain. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A deed restriction means the property can only be occupied by full time employee of either Town of Vail or Eagle County. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A property that is sold under market value and can only be sold according to the restrictions on the property. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH A deed restriction is a rider on the deed that prevents some act from taking place in or on the property so restricted. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Purchased by full-time local employee for housing, not investment. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED REFUSED NOT TOO MUCH A deed restriction is something that limits the use of/building of a home in one fashion or another. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT NOT TOO MUCH Type of housing that is restricted by some measure. For example, how it is used, how much it can be sold for, what you can build on it, etc. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN REFUSED It depends on the terms of the restrictions. Enough is enough. Wages is as much of a problem. Need controls on unrelated tenants. Residential owners should not be taxed for more of this. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN REFUSED Limitation on property. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED A home that has a limit for how much profit you can sell it for. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED The price of the homes cannot go up. No matter what, the home will sell for the same price. You can only do so much in upgrades to the home. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Maybe it is specifically around the rent. You have to buy it. June 18, 2019 - Page 254 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 25 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT A residential property with some type of restriction permanently affixed to the title. The deed restriction can vary, some cap the appreciation of the home and all (that I know of) indicate specific qualifications for the full time resident such as an Eagle County resident who works 30 hours per week in Eagle County. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT 3% cap on appreciation. Must be working,contributing in the vicinity. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Managing investment growth. Great project in west Vail. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT A home that has rules about living in it. Typical restrictions include requirements to work in a certain area, the home must be primary residence, and a cap on appreciation. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Homes where the town buys a deed restriction from the owner to lower the market price of the property to make it "affordable" to local residents with full time jobs in the town of Vail. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT I know why a "deed restricted home" is and I am in approval of having them. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT It is where the town provides for the individuals to have the requirements on profits and how much they can sell it for. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT For locals, and resale to approved locals at maximum 3% price increase/years owned. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT It is housing that can only be sold or leased to a full time Eagle County employee and may include limits on yearly appreciation. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Owner may not sell at market value. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT There is a limit to the amount you can make, when you sell your home. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT They are only being occupied by someone who lives in Vail or the county. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Employee housing restricted to Eagle County or Vail specific work force. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT It is a home that costs less than the average home for someone who is a first-time homeowner and works in the Town of Vail. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT I don't know how to answer that question. June 18, 2019 - Page 255 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 26 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Housing allocated for low-income occupants. FEMALE REFUSED DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT You can only resell for a certain amount...each year it goes only up by that percentage... FEMALE 35-44 OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT Keeps from flipping houses. You can't sell a property for more than a percentage raise in what you paid. MALE 55-64 OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT Subject to restrictions. FEMALE 65+OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT It is a home that is only allowed to be appreciated by a controlled small amount per year. MALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT A home with a restriction on the deed to use in the restrictions own way. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT A home with restricted use and limitations, including rent parameters. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT A deed-restricted home has limitations as to who can purchase it and how it is used. MALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT A home that can only be sold to or occupied by a person working in the town of Vail or upper valley full time. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT One that is restricted in some way that is reflected in the deed and is in perpetuity. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT A property that is encumbered by certain limits to an owner's use or sale of the property. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT A residence for local employees with 3% restricted increased valuation per year. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Various restrictions: must be Employed 30 hrs. In Town of Vail; must live in unit and rent to employees; cap on profit on resale; must qualify to participate in lottery; can only sell to employee in Town of Vail or county; probably more, very complicated process! MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Income restricted ownership with limited resale gain. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT A home that has been sold to a local year round resident and eagle valley worker at a reduced price, and in return that local can then only sell it at a reduced price, their appreciation is limited so that the "deed restricted home" hopefully stays"affordable" FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Private agreements that restrict the use of real estate in some way. June 18, 2019 - Page 256 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 27 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT It is a home that can only be occupied by an Eagle County employee. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT A title encumberance which can limit a number of uses of the property. In this context it is a tool to ensure that a property is occupied by a permanent working resident of Eagle County. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Restrictions contained in a deed that limit how a property can be used and what can be built on it. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT A home that has restrictions on the deed. Restrictions can vary on income, residency, property ownership, etc. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT A home that is more"affordable"than the open market but is restricted in several ways. Must work in Vail, no renting FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Housing that is limited to workers in Town of Vail clocking in 30 hours a week or more. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT A home where the amount the value can increase is locked by the town so the owner sees some but limited growth in the value of their home. Making the resale"affordable"to the next purchaser of said property. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT It comes in different forms. in the strict sense - All deed restrictions burdening price capped for sale housing units must include resale restrictions binding future buyers and sellers to the applicable conditions set forth in the guidelines and these administrative procedures and shall be in a form approved by the Program Administrator and the attorney's Office. All purchasers shall execute the deed restriction as well as an Acknowledgement of Deed Restriction. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT For this purpose, it means restricting the property to ownership by a local resident, employed in Vail and sometimes imposing a limit on the percentage of the resale value. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT It is simply a home that has a restriction built into a deed. It states the home must be used by a local area resident or a full-time resident. June 18, 2019 - Page 257 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 28 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT A home that is restricted as to who can own the home i.e. homeowner must work a certain amount of hrs in town or county to be able to purchase, or property has an appreciation cap that restricts the amount of annual appreciation that can be realized by the homeowner. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT A scam. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Not available for multiple individual rentals. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Ownership restricted to a certain class of owners, i.e. town employees. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Probably is only a little restricted. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Restricted to employees working in the town of Vail or Eagle County. FEMALE REFUSED REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT A home with restrictions dictating who can live there. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT A home that can only accrue at a certain amount per year and has terms of the purchase and sale. Often includes "first right of refusal" provisions and limitations on how many homes you can own as well as working restrictions on where your job must be located. I own one of these homes. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I have no idea. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I believe, generally, that a deed-restricted home is one that is provided in this challenging home market in order to provide a lower price point for buyers. They are then unable to get equity for their home. I have always heard it is like a savings account. You are net getting equity. You own it and you can sell it back, but you won't get much equity from it. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No comment. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT A home in community that requires its residents to comply with various restrictions set forth by a governing body that has ultimate oversight on all things related to that home and the terms by which it can be occupied. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No transfer tax or inflated resale price. June 18, 2019 - Page 258 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 29 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Restrictions contained in a deed that limit how a property can be used and what can be built on it. In the town's case, perimeters on who can own the home and cap the appreciation value. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT You are restricted in the ways you use or sell the home. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT It would be a restriction on the use of the property, which is carried on by the use of the deed. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT "Affordable"housing" purchasing with minimal increase for future sales FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Deed restricted properties are to be sold or rented to individuals that work an average of 30 hours per week in Eagle County. They cannot be used for short term rentals. If a deed restricted property goes to market, they usually sell for less than free-market units. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT House that has bylaws governing what can be done with it. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT My view of Deed Restrictions is that a home comes with specific parameters and guidelines as to who qualifies to buy it, limited appreciation / resale, etc. etc. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Somewhat unsupportive. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Stipulation placed on a property. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT It is a home that the land is owned by the town. The house is owned by the person. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Can only be occupied by full time employees. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Properties that have limitations imposed on the title that may include some or all of the following: occupancy requirement, employment status, sale restrictions, gain restriction. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Restrict your property to be occupied by someone who works in Eagle County. Can be either the homeowner or full time renter. The property can no longer be used as a short term rental property. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Cap on price valuation, special rules applied to applicants for the opportunity, lease on land. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Employee. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Employee only June 18, 2019 - Page 259 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 30 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Homes may not be used as a second home. Homes are supposed to be occupied by people who work in Town of Vail or Eagle County. The number of hours required to qualify is too low! People can be part- time or less and still qualify. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Limits the use on the land on which the house sits. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT 3% appreciation a year, must be a fulltime resident and work in Vail. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT A home that either requires a lock off with a rental for residents and employee's of the Vail Valley, and or homes that have a fixed price and fixed gains allowed to provide a source of"affordable"homes for residents of Vail. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Deed restricts the use of the home for whatever is delineated in the restriction. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Hard to sell. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Not available for less than 1 year leases. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT To me it means restrictions on the owner, not sure it's fair to owners of property MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I assume it has something to do with the title not owned by the owner. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT A unit is available to a group of individuals, based on specific criteria, at a set price. The unit must be resold under the same guidelines. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Appreciation is regulated and limited and must be used for employee housing. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Housing with restricted appreciation and lower prices than regular market, restricted to employees. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT They are only allowed to appreciate a certain amount each year. You have to be in the Vail workforce. When you sell it, it has to be to the residents or workers of Vail. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT It is a home that is available to people who work and meet the work requirements to be eligible for housing. There is also an appreciation cap on resale. June 18, 2019 - Page 260 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 31 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT A home that has language restricting the resale of that property placed on the recorded deed. For example to a person working 30 hr/ week or more in Vail or Eagle County. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Ensuring that owner works a minimum of 30 hours per week as a full time resident in Eagle County and in some cases the deed restriction also puts a cap on appreciation. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Must sell at a very minor increase in price. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Occupied by current resident working in t ecommunity. No 2nd homeowner and no short term rental. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No comment. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Restricts who can own it or rent it. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT The owner doesn't own the land. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT The restriction limits the annual appreciation and/or who can live in the unit. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT This question should ask what "deed-restricted" means in Vail at present. There can be all sorts of deed restrictions. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I think you must work in Vail or Eagle County at least 30 hrs per week. I think you cannot own another home in Vail. I think the resale percent is capped. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Restrictions to a property. Private agreements, listed in the deed itself, that restrict the use of real estate in some specific way. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED SOMEWHAT Subsidized housing which is intended to be more "affordable" for people. Capped on amount of annual return in value so not as attractive for homebuyers who can move farther from the Vail valley and see a potential larger return on their real estate investment over time MALE 45-54 REFUSED REFUSED SOMEWHAT A home that cannot increase in cost when sold more than a certain percentage per year. MALE REFUSED REFUSED REFUSED SOMEWHAT This is a ridiculous question. Are you trying to insult the intelligence of individuals that may not fully comprehend deed restrictions and or the Towns mission on housing? June 18, 2019 - Page 261 of 404 "In your own words, being as descriptive as possible, please tell me what you think a “deed-restricted” home is." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 32 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT I don't know. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT Only eligible people are allowed to own that house. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT I don't know. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT Below market value home with income/appreciation limits on buying and selling. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT A home that qualifying families can purchase for less than market value in exchange for agreeing that any appreciation when they go to sell is also capped. If you are single, don't expect the program to work for you since families with children are the target group and singles are discouraged from seeking deed restricted housing. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT I'm not certain on that. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT A "deed-restricted" home in which there are regulations on how the property can be used. In Vail it is used to keep properties available only for individuals who live and work in the county at least half the time. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT A home purchased at a discount rate with the agreement of some kind of selling or valuation restriction (must sell to a local worker, 3% appreciation cap etc.) MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT A home with a "held" deed, that allows for more"affordable"homes, but the homeowner doesn't receive the same rights like a deed holder. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT It is a home that the deed is restricted for resale for the people of the valley. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT It is a restriction. It encumbers the title of the property. It requires the occupants to work within the Vail Valley. June 18, 2019 - Page 262 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 1 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE People are needed to work and live in the resort communities. Without access to a supply of affordable homes it makes living in the community almost impossible. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE This town and community are built around our mountain. The town and resort have a duty to help the people that work hard to keep everything moving. How can we not help those people. Hard workers are being forced down valley because the wages cannot support living within the town. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE If local government doesn't make an effort all housing will put price the local worker. You don't want your entire workforce commuting from far away. It deters people from staying and causes issues during inclement weather for businesses. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It's hard to find good employees. Creating more housing allows for our growing town to help employ our businesses. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Resort communities are expensive to live in, local governments should own up to ensuring the workers who make the town run are able to live in the town without worrying about paying all of their income to live there. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE To keep the workforce local and maintain a year round community. June 18, 2019 - Page 263 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 2 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE There should be more. They should also be somewhat more affordable - the Chamonix project was laughable. The build quality for something at that price point SHOULD NOT show up prefabricated on a flat bed truck. We can do better than that! MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE This is becoming a vary transient community. I've had many employees leave due to cost of living and not being able to get into a home. They felt there was no future. Some of these employees were highly valued and very good at their trade. These are the people we need to stick around! With the average years of employment % dropping every year I believe we are on a bad trend. I feel affordable deed restricted units below $300k would help keep some people around. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE I agree with the viewpoint because, as the VLHA has been saying for YEARS, affordable housing is infrastructure, as important as streets, water and sewage, fire and police protection, etc. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE If resort towns wish to keep families and professionals within the community some assistance must be offered. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Keeps a viable community in town as opposed to pushing work force to the fringes. June 18, 2019 - Page 264 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 3 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE We are a resort community. We need to provide the best customer service to our visitors. In order to do that we need to have a strong community of people who work. Without housing we are losing potential workers. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Yes they should definitely make reasonable efforts. it's in the resorts and town's best interest. Because the better the firefighters, teachers, resort workers, everything the better those people are, the better they can support their families, the more attractive to move here the better people you get working and living here permanently. It raises the overall quality. Otherwise you get transient, poorly educated potentially, and younger people who aren't willing to stay and invest in the community. If there's no place for good families to live they move elsewhere where it is more attractive and less expensive. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It is too attractive of an area for second and third home owners. If we won't make those efforts, there will be no opportunities for the people who are working here to live affordably. June 18, 2019 - Page 265 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 4 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE First off, its important to have our employees who work in Vail, also live in Vail. It strengthens a community and helps to build a community. Let those of us who work in town also live in town to create a sense of pride and loyalty. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Good idea. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Vail is a cruise ship in the mountains. Even a cruise ship provides housing for its employees. Without people having permanent residency in Vail, it ceases becoming a community. That has happened. June 18, 2019 - Page 266 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 5 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE I've spoken with friends from Denver who own in Vail and short term rent. They argue that they are entitled to high revenue from their rental, yet complain when they can't get good service at businesses in Vail. it's cost prohibitive for workers to live in Vail therefore they have to drive long distances. No one wants to work in Vail any longer and that is evidenced by the shortage of over 1600 employees in the valley. A minimum wage worker can't afford the astronomical rents in Vail. We have lowered the quality of the resort experience for our visitors because we don't take care of our workers!! If workers aren't happy, they aren't nice and accommodating to our visitors. Believe it or not, we did survive with many visitors prior to Airbnb and VRBO. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Wages are well below state and national averages and if they wish to retain workers they need to help. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE How else can working people afford to live in this community? A greater supply would allow liquidity in this market. Deed restricted allows workers not to feel tied to their jobs as they are in employee housing which allows their employers to underpay them. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It is the ONLY way that will allow wokers to live in Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 267 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 6 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Quality of life is a prime government responsibility. Housing is infrastructure for a town to function. We don't want Vail to become a cruise ship in the mountains. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Time has shown that without municipal involvement the supply of affordable housing shrinks and the year round population shrinks as well. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Resort communities have inflated housing costs based on affluent buyers' capacity to pay that out stripes ability of local median household incomes. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE The resort economy is so hot that needed local workers are priced out, I.e. they cannot afford to buy or rent in the community leading to worker shortages , even of professionals, and long commutes environmentally damaging. Public subsidies of local housing becomes the source of last resort. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE They need to attract prospective employees. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Yes FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It gives the workers more opportunities to live in the town. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE If we don't we will no longer be a community. Instead we will become a place where part time residents comprise the majority of the population, like Beaver Creek. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE More projects. June 18, 2019 - Page 268 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 7 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Otherwise, the community is not sustainability for the next 30 years! MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Provides a variety of age groups and diversity in population. Provides a year round community MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Too much of our housing is second homes owned by non residents who rent at inflated levels. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE I think it is important that the housing provided by the town be for the residents of the town. It would be completely unfair if a part time resident or someone who has relocated from the Valley get to continue to make use of the housing provided for the workforce. I do not agree with the fact that all of the houses you build were similarly priced to open market value homes where the owners can do as they please with their property and make money off the sale. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE The towns need GOOD workers. And good workers are happy workers. If you don't have to drive a million miles to get to work and can enjoy your surroundings a bit it makes a world of difference. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Town is doing zero to help provide housing so this questions is stupid. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE To have a complete community, people that work within the town must be able to live and play there also. Vail is unique in that there are many unoccupied 2nd homes here. June 18, 2019 - Page 269 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 8 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE The unrestrained free market will not provide housing solutions in our community. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It allows people to live near where they work. It allows those with families to own homes. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It takes a team, the city, local businesses, and developers. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE I wouldn't purchase a deed restricted home unless that was my only option. I do agree with it because it provides others the opportunity to live in their own home and at least pay their own mortgage versus someone else's with renting. FEMALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Businesses need employees and employees need housing. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE We need people to run this town/resort and if those people don't have place to live that they can afford the town/resort won't operate as it should. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE To maintain a working community that can afford to live in the town where they work. There needs to be a balance of economics and income levels and if we do not have affordable housing the balance will shift to one side. June 18, 2019 - Page 270 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 9 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because that is the only way it will happen. Construction and entitlement costs are just too high to make the numbers work without some help to developers. In the absence of a program like this, the problem will only worsen and it will be harder and harder for local families to be able to afford to live up valley or even mid valley. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It is very important for the workforce. We need them for their services. Vail needs to improve the housing for the workforce. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because it's needed. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Otherwise you will not have workers or will have to pay them much more than current wages are. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Without affordable housing we will not have employees to keep our businesses running. We strive for a high level of customer service in Vail as we are a first class resort. Without deed restricted homes the second homeowners will purchase all available and affordable options. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE I have seen it as a problem for over 35 years. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE If the effort is not put forth to either construct, rebuild, or purchase units for the workers in Vail. These communities will fail to the lack of manpower and service. We can not continue to burn out the workers that are here. It becomes not fun after a while. June 18, 2019 - Page 271 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 10 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It is a good effort to, provide affordable housing for local employees. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Without a doubt. If not we will become aretiree community. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It is to keep a strong economy. MALE REFUSED REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Housing in mountain communities is highly sought after by wealthy non-residents who like to vacation to the area and this drives out local workforces which is essential to the local economy to be able to thrive. Maintaining homes in mountain towns for locals is highly important to allow for the town to have a community and will further benefit the local economies. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Forces guests into hotels vs Airbnb's so we get more tax revenue, and more housing for locals. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE The towns can help foster communities and retain the necessary professional talent required for a healthy town workforce. Without the help the "town" is simply a resort. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Local housing is necessary for the health of the mountain community. Employees that can live close to where they work are happier, it is better for the environment, and the sense of the community. June 18, 2019 - Page 272 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 11 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE We have to be completely open in not find parking spaces or we would have to help out with housing. If we are trying to have people to move here, we need government money. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because we need people who live and work in our community to ensure businesses run and to actually have a community and not a second home destination. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It is the only way to keep a quality work force. Our town is expected to provide great service and create a certain experience for guests. Without employees and residents who care about their community and their home this is next to impossible. Vacation home owners have all but made the affordable open market extinct. Where does it stop? Deed restriction is necessary to keep the people here, they are who keep the town and resort alive. June 18, 2019 - Page 273 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 12 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE It supports local businesses and aids their ability to grow and retain workers. Wages in resort communities tend to lower and seasonal, professional jobs are more limited, the cost of living is higher, healthcare is basically unobtainable without an employer sponsored plan--childcare is nearly impossible; when you add to all this the scarcity of affordable housing it is not a very enticing prospect for almost any demographic of the labor market to move here or stay here. Without skilled labor it is impossible for businesses to grow and develop. I think there should be expanded focus on other areas of affordability and livability in our community. Subsidized preschool/childcare, small business development resources, innovative solutions to reduce the cost of healthcare and reduction of taxes on items that unequally affect lower income families (groceries, utilities, taxes on construction materials for homes with lower property values or which are occupied by a local) are all options which come to mind. I would like to see more innovative solutions beyond deed restrictions, as the pool of available housing June 18, 2019 - Page 274 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 13 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Sustainability as if we fail to act on this matter, we will find ourselves in a situation where all frontline staff lives downvalley at best. GSAT will suffer and in turn Vail will suffer. World Class mandates we act. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE We need to have affordable housing available to people who are dedicated to the valley and this town. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because it is really hard for the companies in this valley to recruit and retain employees when the cost of living is so high. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because we will always need actual persons to work at our businesses. If they're commuting, they're less connnected to our community, customer service can suffer, and they don't participate in community events/planning. Even folks who love Vail but have moved to Eagle or Gypsum and less invested in keeping Vail vibrant. it's becoming a retirement community served by youngsters, who no longer hangout in Vail. (I'm more towards retirement than youngster.) FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE The majority of employees the Resorts need to maintain quality customer service are individuals that are not sustaining an income that they would be able to afford market value property prices in Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 275 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 14 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE There are not enough workers who can afford to live here. local businesses cannot pay enough for workers to afford to live nearby without deed-restricted options. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE A community is not a community without people living in it. Vail was built as a pedestrian community with excellent public transportation infrastructure outside of the commercial cores. Encouraging people to live in town cuts down on the amount of parking needed, cuts down on traffic congestion, air pollution and global warming emissions. In addition, encouraging people to live in Vail encourages support of local shops, bars and restaurants - people are more likely to spend money where they live. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE A resort town is only a community if it counts local, contributing members as part of its population. Without them, it's a large bedroom for tourists, lacks character and ultimately feels more like an amusement park than a town. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Housing construction costs are high and the only way to get developers to build housing is to help with subsidy. You can't force developers to build housing without subsidy. It just won't happen. June 18, 2019 - Page 276 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 15 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE In a word: workforce. Staffing has become increasingly difficult for local businesses because there is nowhere for employees to live. From my standpoint as a year-round resident of Vail for the past 34 years, it has already made a noticeable negative impact in the level of service. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE I know of businesses that have trouble finding employees because it's expensive to live in the valley. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE The lack of attainable housing for local residents is the most critical problem facing resort communities today. It has far- reaching negative economic and social impacts and implications for the communities. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE They need communities, not just second- home owners and seasonal employees to live in their towns to ensure vitality and to keep the lights on. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE This may be the only way a young couple, individual or family will be able to afford to own their own home. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Yes. As a matter of fact, there is a new deed restricted unit where I own and live. Unfortunately it was not a new deed restricted unit but a replacement one from a housing unit that was "bought out". June 18, 2019 - Page 277 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 16 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE "If you build it, they will come". Without affordable housing, we will not have employees. Without housing, we will not have neighbors and a sense of community. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Its the only way that the community and all the businesses will have staff to fill the positions that are needed! The turnover in town and with VR is huge! Fun place to 'ski bum' for a season but not realistic to plan to stay. HIGH COST OF LIVING AND LOW PAY! MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Our employee shortage is directly related to the lack of affordable housing. If we want to continue to be a world class resort we need to offer a polished product with a quality work force. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE To create community. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Then employees have there own place to live and work harder like most locals do already. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE To maintain an environment where workers can live, and maintain the diversity of the community, otherwise you will have a community of second and third homeowners. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Without the supply of these homes, we will no longer have a community of residents. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY AGREE Make deed restricted homes available on now designated open space. June 18, 2019 - Page 278 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 17 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG STRONGLY AGREE Where demand for experiencing the mountains far exceeds supply to accommodate that experience, governments must regulate to not only maintain but grow their community (not just their commerce) in a smart, concerted fashion and hot further excerabate problems. MALE 35-44 REFUSED REFUSED BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because people employed in the resorts do not make enough money to afford housing in the area. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because deed restrictions keep people who do not live here from making extra money off a second or third home that could otherwise be used for local housing. It is, afterall, the locals that keep Vail running. Yes we need the business of tourists, but without locals the tourists would come to a ghost town and have fewer amenities, clean hotel rooms, restaurants, and activities to participate in. You can't run a resort on J1 visas alone. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG STRONGLY AGREE If you want people to work here you better make sure they can afford to live here. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG STRONGLY AGREE No comment. June 18, 2019 - Page 279 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 18 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Deed-restricted housing helps mitigate the possibility for available housing to be purchased by second home owners. By the Town of Vail providing deed-restricted housing, it makes a statement to the community that the full-time residents are the priority, not the second home owners. Deed-restricted housing would help help the local economy. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE I completely agree. Our entire town caters to tourists and we should be able to affordably house the workers and locals who make that possible. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE It's important that people are able to live in the communities they work in. Without deed restriction, Vail's socioeconomic diversity would suffer more than it already has... FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Local Governments should increase the supply of deed-restricted housing because more and more employees want to stay in Eagle County or Vail full-time and make it their primary residence. With the housing market being geared towards the 2nd and 3rd homeowners, becoming a fulltime employee and resident is extremely difficult. Why train a different employee every six months when you can train one employee to work for 6 years. June 18, 2019 - Page 280 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 19 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Our workers make our community run, and they can't afford healthy habitats. Going home to a run down apartment with 5 other people when you have goals of owning a home is depressing. I think deed restricted homes and different communities (some family friendly, some more focused on outdoorsy younger people) would be a great thing. I think the importance of making different focus communities is great. I do not want to move into a community that is focused towards families, because that is not my goal or lifestyle. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE They should make reasonable efforts to increase the supply of deed-restricted housing because the majority of people who live here year round can't afford to own or rent and it is driving locals away. If there were more affordable housing options, especially for those trying to own, more people would not think a stable life here is out of the question. More would pursue long term professions, not just seasonal work and try to buy a home if there were actually options. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Vail is loosing its sense of Cummings and work force. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE It is impossible for young professionals to afford housing. June 18, 2019 - Page 281 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 20 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because otherwise there won't be anyone living here who also works in their community. The town will suffer for it if it becomes untenable to raise a family here. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because something has to be done to make property affordable for someone other then second home owners. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Quality of skilled labor to drive our local businesses. Quality of life for long term local residents and creating a sense of community in Vail rather than a transient ski town . MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE We need more resident housing. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because its citizens cannot afford to live here. This causes many people to leave the town of Vail. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE We have a lack of professional labor in the area. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because its the right thing to do. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE We need to keep a year round local population that can afford to live here as opposed to a community full of only second or third home owners who only spend a few out of the year in our community. Workers can barely afford to live in and be a part of this community because rents have skyrocketed. Without a working class that makes living wages this town will continue to have massive employment problems going forward. June 18, 2019 - Page 282 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 21 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because Town of Vail also controls the number of building permits that occur. If Town of Vail can improve the number of available affordable home (<500K) on the market, full time resident will have a better chance at actually finding a home rather than having go down valley or leave VV. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because a large population that live and work here do not make enough money to buy outside of deed restricted, we are the ones that do the actual labor that keeps the tourism afloat. Yet we are the ones that can't afford to purchase a home. So you also have more seasonal workers, which is costly for both employers and the tourists. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE If you want the Town of Vail to succeed, you need employees that can afford to live here. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE There is a shortage of housing for local workers to rent and to buy. This could be helped by adding more deed restricted housing. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE It won't happen to the regular market place. MALE 18-34 OTHER RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE If the workforce has no place to sleep you loose your workforce and the whole community suffers. June 18, 2019 - Page 283 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 22 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 OTHER RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE So that the homes cant just be purchased by second homeowners and others who will just rent them out as a B&B. This is important to keep homes affordable for people who actually want to make this town a place to settle/live long term and potentially raise families. MALE 35-44 OTHER RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Making these kind of places available will benefit the town by ensuring hard working stable people are in the area. MALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE There are so many jobs here and NO PLACE to live. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE A lot of mountain towns are too pricy to purchase into for locals. It causes people to move whether they want to or not. Even if they just want to stay a season, paying $1800 for a one bedroom is not reasonable and most people do not want to live with 5 people June 18, 2019 - Page 284 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 23 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Housing is in very high demand in resort towns. Many people with money come and buy up all of the inventory and rent it out or airbnb it. This causes the cost of a house to skyrocket. There are not a lot of career opportunities here in the valley. Most of the community is not making six figure incomes. It is unrealistic to think that the average middle class single family can afford a $800,000 house. I am a registered nurse and make descent money and I still can't afford to buy a condo unless it's dead restricted. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE This keeps locals around without second home owners able to buy up all property, which would in turn lead to pushing out all locals who run the restaurants and shops because there are no livable options left. This needs to happen on a rent-based level as well for those not looking to buy a $400k+ apartment. Locals who work 30 hours/week in town should be able to find affordable rentals. MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Affordable housing for the working class people in the Town of Vail is very hard to come by and causes people to leave and move elsewhere where housing is actually somewhat affordable. $400k-$700K is no where near affordable for someone making $25-$35HR June 18, 2019 - Page 285 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 24 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE There would be very few local homeowners in vail. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE If they didn't, there would be no work force that could afford to live in resort communities to serve their guests. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Residents contribute taxes, labor, employment, culture, consumer demand, and community investment year around and are essential to maintaining a stable, sustainable, and balanced community and economy. MALE 45-54 REFUSED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE The lower paid local employees will not be able to live near their jobs because they cannot afford to live in Vail. FEMALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE It is hard to find affordable housing for typical residents of that area. The fact that they offer deed-restricted housing for people in that area who aren't millionaires is important. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE I think they increase the number of options in the area. It is great for single-family homes for people who wouldn't be able to live in the area otherwise. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE I tell you local business is going to hurt significantly. there isn't anyone who can afford to reside in Vail and work full time. Its a HUGE problem and it needs to be fixed. I would welcome deed restricted housing. June 18, 2019 - Page 286 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 25 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE If the government doesn't purchase and doesn't have the deed-restricted houses, then people nationwide or worldwide would buy up all of the houses. None would be left for the people who work in the area. It would be all bought for vacation rentals. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE This is a service environment. For locals, they have to spend a lot to live here. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE It will help them get more employees willing to work at the mountain resort. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE There is nothing available, so someone needs to restrict them so that the billionaires can't buy up all the properties. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE If they do not, there will eventually not be enough laborers to support the lifestyle which 2nd homeowners and tourists seek. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE No comment. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE As a teacher in the Vail community, I think there needs to more available options for both teachers and the families that contribute to the Town of Vail. This includes lower prices on a home (over $300,000 is not affordable). I agree with the town set aside homes for people who actually live and work in the valley. This current situation is a renters market with unaffordable prices for tenets. There needs to be a shift to an emphasis on locals. June 18, 2019 - Page 287 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 26 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Pretty soon there won't be any employees to keep things running and Vail will become a ghost town. If the private businesses aren't going to pay living wages and or provide housing, the government better step in, especially if they want to continue to live in a town where people actually want to come (think, if all ski patrol, mountain safety, lifties quit who would take care of the gapers)? FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE So that the people who live here can afford it and keep the town running the way it does. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE The locals of Vail are those who make the town and resort run on a daily basis. Without adequate housing, the workforce will continue to dwindle. High turnover and less qualified individuals will diminish the quality of our town as well as the tourism industry. Without affordable housing and competitive pay its only a matter of time until there is no one qualified to run the resort, stores, restaurants and even the hospital. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Vail Resorts is a big example. They bring in ski bums to run lifts and occupy a lot of housing during the winter, they have dorm rooms instead of opening it up for apartments for more permanent residents. June 18, 2019 - Page 288 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 27 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE If the wealthy homeowners in town of Vail want their resorts to run smoothly, they should assist with the housing issues. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Locals are the lifeblood of a resort community. Without them the facilities of the resort cannot be staffed and therefore cannot run. It obviously can't go the opposite direction either where there is only housing for locals and non for the seasonal or vacation tourists because they provide valuable income as well. Right now however the balance has been greatly skewed away from local availability. Whether the advent of airbnb, rising prices, or any other issues, the local's market has fallen behind. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE The land values in resort communities are not in alignment with local wages due to the amount of outside money in the real estate market. The only way to better align the two is to limit the market to local employees through deed restrictions. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE We work here. We should live here. Without the employees there is no more Vail. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE That would be to preserve land and houses for locals and not so much for second homes and vacationers. June 18, 2019 - Page 289 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 28 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE As we all know, it can be difficult to staff our businesses. There are so many great businesses looking for help and it is an employee?s market. If we have to move down valley in order to own our own home, we might eventually leave our Vail jobs to work closer to home. Additionally, locals living in town are the heartbeat of this community. If people keep moving down valley and second homeboy owners continue to buy homes here instead of locals, we not only lose our employees, we lose our sense of community. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE I do not agree that Town of Vail had done enough to ensure a viable community through housing for the future. I believe that Town of Vail needs to partner with Vail resorts and or Vail Health ( largest employers) to come up with solutions together. We do not need more rentals for transient employees that trash the town and leave. We need to rebuild a community that is welcoming and affordable for all income levels- especially the employees that run and work in the businesses within our town. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE It has to happen so Vail isn't a ghost town. Is the town of Vail really ok with 85% of the homes in town only being occupied 3 weeks of the year. It really takes away from the since of community. June 18, 2019 - Page 290 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 29 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE It should be a top priority. The residents that need deed restricted housing are the life- blood of a resort town. If a town like Vail hopes to continue to charge the prices they currently are they need to have top notch service to justify those prices. You keep good employees by taking care of them. Local, state and federal inaction to regulate short term rentals not only hurts the local community but also the local lodging community. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE They need to supply housing for the employees to work in the Town of Vail. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Employees who live here need to be able to afford to live our they will move away. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE I myself, would not be able to stay in this town, and would live elsewhere. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE NO we are not addressing the core issues of what's causing this crisis. Low wages by our largest employers, and too many unoccupied gigantic homes... MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE So the people that are stewards of this incredible place and take care of the tourists can afford to continue to to be here for all. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE You rely on the workers. The workers are getting pushed out more than ever. Good luck in the long term. June 18, 2019 - Page 291 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 30 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Given the cost of living related to median salary for those who actually work in Vail deed restricted is necessary to maintain a reliable work force. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE I work here. I can barely afford to live here. Rent on my apt is ridiculous. I don't want to commute a long distance - I would rather move away altogether. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Otherwise, most residents can't afford to purchase a home. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE It is on the standpoint of employment. It is difficult for the unemployed or underemployed to travel to their jobs. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Let me explain something to you. Nobody can afford to live here. I can't afford to live here. If that is what the town wants, the hell with it. Are they going to hire the J-1s? They are from Argentina. They can only live here for three months. Then, they have to go home and not stay the entire season. This is ridiculous. What is happening is the housing that is up here, Airbnb, isn't renting places to people for multiple months. They are only renting for four nights. There are a lot of legal Eagle people who aren't signed up for it. For example, you can stay at my place for $1,000 a week. That is what the problem is. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE High housing cost make it difficult for many to begin to afford a home. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Not sure. June 18, 2019 - Page 292 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 31 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Strongly support. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE There is lots of competition for good employees and wages are low but rents are high. Local governments can separate their towns by having affordable housing to attract and retain great employees and residents. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE We live in a very successful resort town where the wealthy own second and third homes. Therefore, it's important the Town steps in to ensure that ordinary people are not priced out and that typical workers can share-in-on the continued success of the Town and resort. The workers are those who greatly contribute to the continued success of the Town and resort. This affords a vibrant and authentic resort community that is inclusive to everyone and not just the wealthy. These are values that Vail has spoken of for years?to bring locals back into Vail. Deed restrictions and truly affordable homes for purchase can accomplish this. It truly takes a village and that means we should all be able to share-in-on some of the success if we work hard enough for it. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE Because developers have limitied incentive to provide affordable housing when to goal of a business is to make money. June 18, 2019 - Page 293 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 32 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY AGREE It clear that local worker's wages are severly inadequate to keep up with the cost of buying property in mountain communities. If not for the specific programs to address affordable local housing there would be a severe shortage of local employees who would, of course, look elsewhere to buy property that they can purchase and afford to maintain. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY AGREE We need workers in jobs that do not necessarily pay well. Vail is an expensive community. Deed-restricted housing would help too reduce our problems in this regards. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY AGREE This does not support the previous question which asked if I believe the town makes a reasonable effort. This asks why I think they should. I do not thunk the town should make any effort outside of employee housing related to town support systems town employees. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY AGREE Without affordable housing for workers in Vail, the town is going to collapse. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY AGREE An unregulated market would piss on it's own foot. All available units would be sold as second homes and their would be no employees to provide services to guests. June 18, 2019 - Page 294 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 33 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED STRONGLY AGREE It will put people closer to their workplace and will ease traffic congestion. It will make it a more wholesome town. The resort would not be a resort without people to change the sheets and fix the toilets. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Mountain resort communities are seasonal by nature with a big boom during the winter. Our winter guests choice to come here because of high quality services and amenities (among other reasons). In order to maintain the quality expected, businesses need to maintain high quality employees. Local government should make efforts to bridge the gap between our visitors and our locals, you cannot have one without the other. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Need seasonal minimum wage employees. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE The town will no longer be a local community - it will just be a bunch of vacation homes with part-time residents. Culture, society, etc., require full-time residents in these communities - people who live and work here matter a lot! FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Because I think it is best to have a pool of these deed restricted homes for employees and their families. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE What housing is avaible is bought by folks that don't live in town. Alot of housing is either empty or short term rentals. FEMALE 35-44 OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Employment year round. June 18, 2019 - Page 295 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 34 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE In over 30 years living here, employee housing has always been an issue. Local employers talk about the problem but have never put their money where their mouths are. It thus falls to the public sector to solve the problem. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE They could maintain an employee pool here. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Reasonable means make efforts to find, secure and offer homes that are affordable to locals. It does not mean to provide housing at all cost. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE We will never solve the problems but need to continue to plug along. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Living in Vail has been watching my friends slowly move to Eagle and Gypsum for affordable housing. I believe Vail can be a place to have a professional job and raise a family (with rational expectations on size of home of course- I know I won't have a four bedroom house with a fenced in yard, etc...). I think the presence of deed- restricted home puts it more in reach for those who want to own a home, have a family and live in Vail. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE It is important that the people who work here live close to where they work. It will make their travel easier. June 18, 2019 - Page 296 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 35 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE The quality of employable people goes up when there is a place for them to live. Why would qualified awesome employees and business owners work in Vail if you need to drive 30 minutes to work everyday? I would go somewhere else. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Keeps local long term workers close to their jobs. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE This allows residents the opportunity to live where they work and if their situation changes it will allow the next in line the same opportunity. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE It is to allow employees the availability to live where real estate is very high. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE It helps the local community. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Keeps your labor force in town. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE No comment. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Just do. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Yes FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE There should be a greater effort to have homes available for people who work in the county. June 18, 2019 - Page 297 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 36 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE It's vital to the success of mountain resorts to have employees near work. In Vail's case, if there were a major rock slide or avalanche or bridge collapse between West Vail and Minturn, many businesses would not be able to operate. How many Town of Vail departments would be crippled if only residents of Vail were able to get to work, especially if Vail Pass also closed? How much revenue would be lost if Vail Mountain wasn't able to open on what would have otherwise been a busy day? How much would emergency services be impacted if law enforcement, fire, ambulance, and medical staff couldn't get to work unless they lived in Vail? MALE 65+REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE I have lived in Vail for a really long time. I know a lot of people who would benefit that type of housing. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT STRONGLY AGREE Deed restricted homes allow for people to actually live and work here, but the focus should be on those workers that cannot afford homes at all. Current incentives favor those already in a position to buy. MALE 55-64 OTHER RENT BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE No comment. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Better for residents. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE It prevents people from coming in and from gauging the prices of homes. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE It seems to be a pretty good way to make housing available to local employees without too many restrictions. June 18, 2019 - Page 298 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 37 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Because they are lacking in their primary duty of restricting/outlawing short term rentals and increased taxes on homeowners who do not live here. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Residents who work and provide services for guests and other local residents are vital to the continuing prosperity of the town. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE These questions are really biased I think. It depends on the definition of the reasons you have. They are high land prices and limited land open for the development of housing. It should be county-wide instead of just in the town. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE At the end of the day, the housing market in Vail is not conducive for people who work in Vail. The market needs to be corrected for the employees who live close to where they work. That would probably be a good thing. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Mountain towns need a large work force, the majority earning lower than average income. June 18, 2019 - Page 299 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 38 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Need local workers. If the Town will not control the housing supply by other means such as zoning, then it must bite the bullet and try to increase supply. HOWEVER, if the Town is building or financing the housing it MUST restrict the units to Vail workers, not Eagle County workers. It also must ensure that Vail Resorts and Vail Health also provide housing and not look to the Town to build it so they can put long term leases on it. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Without locals there will not be enough individuals to work all of the jobs that are available. Locals need an affordable place to live that is close enough to their jobs. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Because Vail needs a lot of 'extra' employees both during winter and summer seasons. There is not enough housing for those extra employees. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE We need to find a way to get employees here during the winter time or year-round. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE I think we need the government to make efforts to increase deed restricted homes. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE I don't have a comment. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE For the economy of a town to survive by being able to offer housing to its workers at a reasonable price. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE We are losing our viable younger work force and identity as a community of locals. June 18, 2019 - Page 300 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 39 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Because Vail is losing it's character without true locals living in town; doesn't feel like a town - it is mostly Denver and Mexican 2nd homeowners now. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE To allow for good quality of life for those living and working in Vail and to help decrease the amount of people that leave the area because it is unaffordable. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Get rid of fifth home owners that are here 2- 3 weeks a year and build housing for working people. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE There are a very few Vail properties that are affordable for the people who live here permanently. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE To help provide families make a permanent home; providing more of a community for full time residents. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE We can't maintain customer services without employees. If we make it too difficult to work here why would they live here. There are many other choices. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE While I prefer to see a market driven housing solution, we are way past the ability of the Vail Housing Market to correct itself to provide additional lower cost housing. June 18, 2019 - Page 301 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 40 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Cost of living in mountain communities is very high and I don't believe most employers pay ACOLA to employees. This poses challenages for employers to aquire strong customer service employees. Customer service is extremly important in our valley and can make or break return visitors and even retain long term residents. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Since no one else is doing anything, it is by default a government function. That being said, we need to understand that by taking on this role, other employers, including Vail resorts, can keep wages artificially low and perpetuate the problem. This not a long- term strategy that can be financially viable. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE The town of Vail is a tourist mountain resort and in order to keep that image and safety in such a small town, certain rules and restrictions are sometimes necessary. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE More homes available for full time residents. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Compensation for resort employees does not line up with the budgets of 2nd homeowners. Something has to be done to bridge the gap. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE We need to have a community here. June 18, 2019 - Page 302 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 41 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Because too many people buy up properties that do not live, improve, or are a big part of the Vail community. I applaud giving locals a chance with deed restrictions but capping appreciation on locals also just sets them back both financially and personally against the people who can afford non deed restricted property. While in the long term this keeps certain housing costs low in the market it also stops people from fully getting the value back out of their property to move on or upgrade to the next level. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE This is the locals only choice! And they still pay $350,000 for it! What other choice do they have?? FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE People shouldn't have to work two to three jobs to have a place to live. Making affordable housing for people encourages more long term citizens and workers who love this town and state. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE We have workers throughout the community that do not make enough money to live here and have a quality of life. The deed restrictions help people find affordable homes. I think there would be a lack of need workforce if deed restrictions were not in place. MALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE Those are the people that make your town run. They make The Town of Vail what it is and its reputation. June 18, 2019 - Page 303 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 42 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE I think having deed restricted homes available to locals helps to keep the tremendously wealthy from coming in and buying a home that then sits empty for 90- 100% of the year and not contributing much to the local economy. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE I think it's necessary support to keep educated and career-oriented families in communities where earning potential is much lower. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE I don't believe that government should have to step in. We as a community long ago decided that the overall wellness of the local community should be shadowed by those who come in with deeper pockets. Frankly, I feel that the housing authority is shitting their pants because you all realized we have reached a tipping point. This is where local employees can no longer afford to live and work in the valley. So, what is your solution? Have big government step in, and essential reduce the benefits of actually owning a home? Be tougher on those who do NOT live in the valley! MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE The town needs public safety and teachers. June 18, 2019 - Page 304 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 43 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE It is their duty. If they are the agency or the representative of the people of that town, it is their duty to make sure those people have a decent place to live in the area and not outside that area. The agency needs to plan ahead and foresee how to take care of those residents because it will only benefit the town's economic income. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT AGREE We need more places for locals to live. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL SOMEWHAT AGREE It is more an employer responsibility than a government responsibility. Why should government subsidize Vail Resorts, Vail Health, major hotels. Their employees should be excluded from subsidized housing. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT NOT AT ALL SOMEWHAT AGREE To combat the rise in absentee occupied second homes and preserve local character. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT AGREE It is good to lead by example and offer to contribute to the solutions. It is not solely up to local government to solve it. In the case of housing, Vail Resorts and other large business who drive the workforce housing demand need to be invested in the solution. If they are fiscally benefiting from the workforce they need to be financially invested in maintaining it. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT AGREE If people can't afford to live in Vail then they can't work there. June 18, 2019 - Page 305 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 44 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT AGREE This would help to provide affordable housing to employees who work in the Town of Vail and protect them from the peaks and troughs in prices of investment properties around Vail. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT AGREE The key is definition of "reasonable." I don't think we should convert open space, wildlife areas, etc to high density housing. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT AGREE Without adversely affecting the area, towns should facilitate housing for workers. MALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT AGREE The communities need employees to operate. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT AGREE The program permits negotiation between the property owner and the town for the funds received in exchange for the deed restriction. So long as private property owners willingly enter into the deal, I think it's fine and acceptable. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT AGREE No comment. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT AGREE This is a countywide issue. Town of Vail should contribute financially and possibly take the lead as was done when the Berry Creek parcel was purchased decades ago. Mid valley parcel like Avon Stolport should be a high priority for a joint purchase. June 18, 2019 - Page 306 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 45 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN REFUSED SOMEWHAT AGREE It is a wage problem also. Also I will not vote for more employee housing unless ordinances are updated to not allow more than 2 unrelated persons in any rental, and numbers in 2 BR should be no more than 4, 3 BR 6, 1 BR 2, etc. too many problems for neighbors, noise, parking. Residential owners not renting out. We have about 4 different types or restricted units now. Enough is enough. To convert to EHU town should have to give notice to other owners nearby and Associations. An EHU hurts values usually (a few exceptions), usually 25% or more. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED SOMEWHAT AGREE This town has jobs that need to be filled. We can't fill them if people can't afford to live here. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I believe in keeping Vail small. We shouldn't have a bigger economy or it will cause problems. People do need to have an outlet. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Lack of foresight and planning has allowed far too much growth without thinking about who would be servicing these new positions. Progress is inevitable but this is inexcusable and we keep building more without a guaranteed workforce. June 18, 2019 - Page 307 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 46 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE There is a need to provide affordable housing that people in the town can buy that is immune from the artificial valuations of the relestate as out of towners build multimillion dollar homes or purchase homes for inflated prices assuming they can make up the difference in short term rentals. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Because the free market will not provide these units as it is too profitable for them to build to the high end of the real estate market. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Private offerings will not be as afordable. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE To maintain the service level for a "world class" resort. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Sense of community and inclusion of all socio-economic groups within town boundaries.... MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It is badly needed. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It is going to help the regular people who aren't rich to buy homes. It is going to be at a point where they can live. FEMALE REFUSED DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Vail cannot attract or keep necessary employees. FEMALE REFUSED DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Yes. Because we need the workers and they need a place to stay that is reasonable... MALE 55-64 OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Remember who pays the bills. Our local community wouldn't exist without the resort community. FEMALE 65+OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE The real-estate is so expensive. A lot of people can't afford to have a place to live. June 18, 2019 - Page 308 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 47 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I worry that people will get stuck in deed restrictions because they won't be able to pay future market prices. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It is because of the uniqueness of the mountain's economy. The government should be involved and incentivize home ownership. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Higher quality of engaged employees. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I don't have all the information on deed- restricted homes and I do somewhat agree. This appears to be a positive step that local government is taking to help. I don't know that that is what government should do. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE So that the town of Vail has year round residents to provide vibrancy, life and community. I don't want Vail to be a ghost town with only second homeowners being able to afford to live here. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE People travel from all over the world to have a certain experience in Vail Colorado. If individuals / employees are unhappy and have no place to live the service and quality of the lifestyle that we sell will go down. June 18, 2019 - Page 309 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 48 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Because developers like Triumph are making HUGE profits on projects but expect the Town of Vail to use taxpayers $$ to subsidize their construction costs and provide loans with tax payers $$, with crazy "under the table" deals. Town of Vail has land that could be used to develop deed restricted housing at cost, not for profit with a developer that is known to squeeze every dime out of a project. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I would like to see locals being able to buy a home in Vail. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE We need to make sure we maintain a reasonable amount of affordable workforce housing so people can be reasonably close to work. Caution should be exercised to better understand that some work force employees do not want to live in Vail any longer. They would prefer to seek out affordable housing in other locations in Eagle County. Therefore, Town of Vail should work with the county on projects not necessarily in the Town of Vail. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Well for one it has allowed my family to live in Vail. As we work in Vail when the highway is closed it allows for the town to have a local workforce and a sense of community. June 18, 2019 - Page 310 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 49 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE We have had for the 40 some years I've lived here a shortage of employees. It has increased now with the low unemployment rate. Our pay for these employees has not kept up with our cost of living and employees find it hard to pay our high rent or find affordable places to buy. It is especially difficult for families. I do think that some of the burden of supporting the effort to supply deed restricted housing belongs to the major employers, not just local government. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It enables people who work at the resorts to live in the area. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It is not the Town's sole responsibility to provide housing, it should be a partner with owners and developers. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It should be a joint effort along with major employers of the valley. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Stop zoning reasonably priced free market housing out of existance. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I strongly believe that it is important and imperative to make sure that your local workforce is able to invest in a home where they live and work. However, I would like to believe there are creative options, as I mentioned, where young and first time home buyers can be supported to get into the free market of buying a home. June 18, 2019 - Page 311 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 50 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE 100% agree, but businesses cannot rely solely on the town for housing, they must supply housing opportunities for the employees as well. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE A resort and its surrounding community can't run well without a strong workforce, and our workforce needs housing. That said, Town of Vail should be careful so as not to negatively impact current residents, their property values or the environment (ex. wetlands or wildlife) to affect this change. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It is a way to better manage who can purchase properties. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE We need to be able to hire and retain good workers. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE The issue is broader than just the town of Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 312 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 51 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I 'somewhat' agree with the local government using deed restrictions to encourage more year-round working residents to purchase and live in the Vail community. I am for the Town of Vail buying up more units that are already built but I am not for the new development of employee housing. We have open space and bears, deer, moose, fox and many other animals that also share this town with us and we have to preserve the beauty of Vail so that our customers continue to come and spend their money here or else there is no point in any of this. June 18, 2019 - Page 313 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 52 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I think an effort should be made by the Town, but when the Town partners with a bona fide for profit development company to create affordable housing I have an issue. I have an issue with my tax dollars funding a project with the ultimate owner being a for profit company with in the private sector. I realize you want to pass this as a private / public sector relationship and how it is suppose to a win win for everyone, I don't get it. Seems like the Town has a lot of the skin in the game in the acquiring, funding, getting the project off the ground, but then the developer as a partner somehow comes in and manages / owns the affordable housing within a 10 year period? I don't get it! And it makes me sick that the transactions for these affordable / deed restricted / stack a shack projects is not more transparent. The Town is capable of developing and managing these projects, maybe with an owner's rep during the construction phase. And then contract out a managing firm for the rental life of the units. How is a for profit development company owning the project in the end? What does the Town and ultimately tax payers have to FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE There should be some housing available for those who work locally. June 18, 2019 - Page 314 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 53 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Expressed in an earlier statement. The homes should be very modest such that the occupant has aspirations for upgrading to non-restricted property and thus opening up these properties to the next generation. Otherwise, it is just a short-term fix. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It is very important for the community to have a strong workforce in our main industry (tourism). If we are no longer viewed as "world class" because service levels drop we all lose. However, a stricter scrutiny should be placed on the appearance/upkeep of the residences that are included in any deed restriction program. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I believe affordable housing is essential for workers. Whether that housing is available in Vail proper or close communities and whether it is necessary to provide for purchase housing, rather than affordable rentals is a discussion I would like our communities to entertain and engage. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE In order to employees to live close to their workplace in safety and comfort. June 18, 2019 - Page 315 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 54 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Nearly every community in the US has housing problems. Town of Vail should be responsible for helping Town of Vail employees find housing and potentially for helping other employers to a small extent. I'm not convinced that Deed restrictions will continue to work in the long run; Town of Vail may have invested millions in a failed project. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Because it is needed. What is not needed is making developers profit at taxpayer expense. Town of Vail should be the developer. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE There needs to be an affordable source of housing for those who work in the Valley. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I think it is OK for the Town to help facilitate deed restricted access, but I do not support the Town being a landlord. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE The town should do everything possible to limit short term rentals. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE I became familiar with it several years ago. They were not deed-restricted. The places became more and more occupied with people who use them as second homes instead of deed-restricted homes. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Obvious - available housing for employees is at a minimum and some employees are needed for long term and eve employment. June 18, 2019 - Page 316 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 55 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE There is a shortage of working housing. However, additional housing should not be added at the expense of exhisting neighborhoods. The culture of Vail neighborhoods is under attack from short term rentals and employee housing developments. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE They need workers. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE We need employees in town to run the businesses needed for a resort community. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Yes, but not to the financial detriment of those who local residents who with no assistance from government worked hard saved their money and made personal sacrifices to buy their home in the Vail Valley. Don't take money from my family ie by taxing my home and redistribute it in the name of subsidized housing. In fact if you wanted to encourage locals to stay in Vail, why not offer a homestead exemption? I already contribute to habitat for humanity, but its my choosing. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Yes, a reasonable effort but not to the extent of imposing a housing tax on the residents. The town should carry the burden, part of the money from sales taxes should go to this effort. June 18, 2019 - Page 317 of 404 "..Why do you AGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 56 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE REFUSED REFUSED REFUSED SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Individual employees with undoubtedly prefer to live closer to work. Also, by living in the community for which they work, allows for individuals to be more vested in the community and the workplace itself. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE The town needs people living here who can work to support the industry. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE More options lead to a better community. There will be more availability. They will be more affordable. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It allows the working class more opportunity to stay and work to support the town and its tourism. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE It is important because the market continues to increase in price within mountain towns. Deed restricted housing also assists locals in staying within town limits and not being forced out due t secondary homeowners. Without a truly "local" population of people, the community can decline which could result in an economy that blooms, only in the peak seasons, like the winter. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT AGREE Workforce housing is an integral component of the community. June 18, 2019 - Page 318 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 1 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE Deed restricted properties are impacting the value of other units in complexes and often end up staying on the market much longer again impacting the sales of non-deed restricted properties. Plus, given deed restricted can still be quite pricey, for example over $600k for a 2-3BR in Vail, this price point is still very difficult for a new home buyer or lower economic bracket, which again keeps it on the market longer and is not serving the purpose that it was meant to serve but does end up hurting the non-deed restricted properties. We have first hadn't experience with this. FEMALE 18-34 OTHER OWN BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE We need more employee housing. With the deed-restricted housing, there is only one family. The employee housing allows more. FEMALE 45-54 OTHER OWN BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE People lie and cheat. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE They can't get political. You have to take the housing issue seriously in Eagle county and the surrounding counties in the area. Politics cannot get in the way of the vision of the housing authority or anyone else involved in the process. June 18, 2019 - Page 319 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 2 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE Deed-restriction robs the owner the opportunity to gain property value. Being stuck in a lower valued property would decrease incentive to maintain the property. As years pass the deed restricted homes will look out of place and potentially bring the town down. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE I don't believe the town should regulate private homes to be deed restricted. If the town wants to build and own the homes and require deed restrictions that is fine. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE It is a very expensive cost to all residents, I think if employers are having trouble attracting employees they should pay more and be more responsible for providing employee housing. Also, there are many future burdens of deed restricted housing on purchasers that they may not realize when they buy a home. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE If you are trying to be a responsible adult that would like to start a family, you are not eligible for a certain number of bedrooms because you have not had a child yet. Ridiculous!! MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE Town of Vail is NOT in the real estate business. Vail Resorts ( town merchants) should be providing housing for their employees. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE Competing w/the govt. puts the public sector at an unfair disadvantage. June 18, 2019 - Page 320 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 3 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE I'm libertarian. I don't believe in limiting the market supply and demand forces. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG STRONGLY DISAGREE Because the town lets the resort manage the majority of property in town. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE How many people that work in Manhattan live there?? How many people that work in Denver live there?? It is OK to commute like 90% of people in this country!!! FEMALE 65+OTHER OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE The battle was lost 20 years ago. MALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE Housing shouldn't be a government issue. If employers want employees to live in town, then they can provide housing or pay employees more. Town of Vail shouldn't be tasked with subsidizing business. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE Because it's not a Town of Vail problem. It's a Vail Resorts problem. I'm so tired of people complaining about the cost of living in Vail. PEOPLE! it's not just Vail, it's the entire state. Vail is no more expensive than Boulder or Denver. We have an "employee housing unit" aka, a lockoff apartment above our garage. it's a beautiful apartment. We ask a reasonable rent. Guess what. Our last 3 renters (one lady managed the LuLuLemon in Vail, another worked for Bail Resorts, other was chef at Fall Line) completely destroyed the place. Their pit bull attacked our neighbors grand daughter. So we're not even renting it out anymore. Done. It sits empty now. June 18, 2019 - Page 321 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 4 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE Not everyone is going to be able to afford to live in Vail. That's ok- there are many surrounding communities that people can commute from and many transportation options to assist. Pay should be the equalizing factor that drives workers to the community. If the businesses in Vail truly want to provide exceptional service- they'll do that by paying a rate that brings the best- regardless of where they live. I don't believe the government has a responsibility to ensure that everyone has a chance to live in an expensive city. Vail is limited in space by its natural surroundings so any additions your making are going to increase density. This is against the open space efforts and diminishes the value - in relative terms- of any existing property that Vail residents own. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE The government has no business being involved in the local housing market. By the Town of Vail becoming involved, the market is distorted to individuals personal benefit. For example, Anesthesiologists making $600,000/year living in deed restricted housing when they could easily afford a multi million dollar house on the free market. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE I believe in free market. Stop encouraging more growth. June 18, 2019 - Page 322 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 5 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE They should make an effort, but not in Vail. They should commute from down the valley. Forcing this on the town is misguided. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE The Town should not be in the public housing business. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL STRONGLY DISAGREE This is nothing more than a tax payer subsidy of big business. There is already too much government and this is not the government's problem. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE It is a problem created by Vail Resorts and large hotels using a business model to get others to pay their overhead costs. These large employers need to have a business model that charges their customers enough to provide housing necessary to provide the guest services their customers want. There is no reason most of these employees need to live in the Town of Vail. Why is the Town of Vail seeking to make living in the town more un-affordable for current residents via a tax? Is this a push poll? MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE Don't like deed restricted. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE Housing is a commodity, like food and health care. The government actions only distort the efficient functioning of the market, benefited only those that are in the impacted class and disadvantaging everyone else. June 18, 2019 - Page 323 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 6 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE Why decrease the value of other homes by making areas of "low income" housing. There are affordable places to live in towns very nearby. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE We should not make any effort. So they have to travel a bit. I did to when I couldn't find reasonable housing in the city. I took a bus to work. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE I think the local governments are making the tax payer liable for their past mistakes in allowing large entities like the hospital and hotels from coming up with a plan to house their employees. Housing shortage isn't a new thing in resorts. It has been going on since the early days of all ski resorts. It has always been a problem since day one. Expensive land dictates that. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE The town of Vail should not be engaging its municipality in buying and selling real estate. It should be done by professional real estate people and developers and not by the town of Vail. It is in conflict with their fiduciary duty to the town of Vail citizens. June 18, 2019 - Page 324 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 7 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE Employers need to step up and provide a living wage for their workforce. It is not the public sectors job to provide housing. If you are conservatively against socialism....this is socialism. The rules of supply and demand (capitalism) are always strong in real estate markets....everywhere in the world. Vail is not an exception. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE Re-read answer to #9. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE I'm not opposed to efforts to improve access to affordable housing. It is just that this government intervention is unlikely to make much of a difference for most workers. It is hilarious that this program is selling a condo now for $600K as "affordable!" Build huge apartment/townhome complexes in Avon or further east. Stop pretending that solutions exist within the town of Vail. They do not. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE It's a waste of money. My money. You're taking money from taxpayers like me and giving it to people who haven't earned it. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE I think a resort community needs to do what is best to support/sustain the resort, making the town as high end as possible. Deed restricted communities do not add to the value of the town, and should be down valley. June 18, 2019 - Page 325 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 8 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE Not governments roll. This is not what my tax dollars should be used for. Fix the potholes, improve infrastructure, maintain my safety. I am against my hard earned dollars going to support housing for other people to own homes. I feel rental situations for short term seasonal employees needs to be solved by the businesses that benefit from that labor. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE We have enough. All you want to do is tax and spend! FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE Town Government should not be involved in real estate. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE That affordable housing is inconvenient is not a serious concern. Working in Vail does not entitle one to live within walking distance of a lift. Workers throughout the U.S. are quite accustomed to "Drive til you quality" conditions of proximity for housing. Resort town workers are rather spoiled and feel entitled in ways that would not prevail in most cities in America. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT NOT TOO MUCH STRONGLY DISAGREE If I could not afford a residence in a certain town/area/etc., I would look elsewhere for a home. I would not expect the government to assist me. There are other towns in this County to tackle this issue as well, shouldn't just be in the town of Vail. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN REFUSED STRONGLY DISAGREE The loss of an owners property rights when you allow government in as a partner. June 18, 2019 - Page 326 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 9 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY DISAGREE There is a limited space. The housing should be further down in Vail. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY DISAGREE I agree with Town of Vail requiring developers to build employee units as new buildings are erected. As for coverting vacant lands (which make Vail special to begin with) to employee housing I wholeheartedly oppose. There is more housing and lower costs down valley. Town of Vail should focus on busing not building. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY DISAGREE Again, it is not the governments job to provide housing. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY DISAGREE See previous response, this is the responsibility of employers. Government could do more to impact housing by restricting short term rentals which in the long run would return make more housing available for local residents both to rent and own. FEMALE REFUSED REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY DISAGREE I agree with Town of Vail changing existing structures-including Vail and down valley-to deed restricted and for employee housing. A big issue is winter workers and they are not here 12 months a year anyway. There is greater availability and at lesser costs down valley. Building in Vail and ruining beautiful vacant lands, which make this place special, is not the answer. June 18, 2019 - Page 327 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 10 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY DISAGREE I don't support Housing Authority because they don't care about the mountain charm Vail represents. It has approved and or lobbied for every high density proposal that has come before council with no regard for whether it is even economically feasible. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY DISAGREE The town of Vail should provide housing opportunities for their employees and not for those for profit businesses. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT STRONGLY DISAGREE See preceding. The question is much too vague to allow a thoughtful answer. FEMALE 35-44 OTHER OWN BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE These properties are typically for working class families, sure, you give them an option of a place to live, but it robs them of the appreciation. For couples (because typical single income wont' afford even a dded- restricted unit) that don't plan on having children, this is fine. For families, it prevents them from having the earned appreciation in the future. We need more affordable housing for residents to rent while they save to buy a proper home that will appreciate. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE See previous answer. I think employers should be more engaged in deed restricted projects and the financing of those projects. June 18, 2019 - Page 328 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 11 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE I don't totally disagree with government helping out a little but in areas like Vail where the property values are extremely expensive, I think purchasing land and building in adjacent, more affordable communities is wiser choice of spending tax payer money. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE This does not help the housing market and families cannot invest in a home. They need to just make free market homes that can still have the restrictions as mentioned but the value of the home will increase as a normal home would. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE If people are paid reasonably enough in their towns, then there should be a higher pay rate. There would be no need for the government. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE In some sense, my issue is that if the house you have to buy is in Vail, it is too expensive. If it is a house that is unoccupied, it has been already purchased. FEMALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Doesn't give the opportunity to profit from the growth of the town through real estate. Does not apply to the self employed working in Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 329 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 12 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 OTHER RENT BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE I would prefer affordable housing. Lionsridge was proposed to have 300 units but Vail's HOA nixed that saying that would affect their ability to rent their homes during the summer and winter season. This limited the supply of rentable rooms thereby causing a premium on the property. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SOMEWHAT DISAGREE I understand the use of deed restrictions, but it is too much here for the cost of what people pay to live here. Vail BS is not good to the working class. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Because the town then ramrods these projects into neighborhoods where they may not be suitable; size or density wise. It is time for private business to pay a living wage for their circumstances. Or, at least assist their employees with transportation. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Feel government intervention is creating home use that is unrealistic for long term needs of those inhabiting them. As their lifestyle changes they end up being too dependent on a property that may no longer suit them due to cost, maintaining property, size no longer appropriate and might not integrate in neighborhoods that have other interests. June 18, 2019 - Page 330 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 13 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Government and bureaucracy may play a role in some efforts and working with private business but the employers ie. Vail Resorts should be responsible for developing a viable plan for dealing with a part time, low paying seasonal jobs. Dealing with deed restrictions in a long term manner make create long term financial impacts especially when an economic recess impacts housing market costs. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE What is a reasonable effort? I may think your "reasonable " effort is very unreasonably. I don't know what you plan and what unintended consequences there will be. I also don't think it has to be in the town limits. I don't think the employee housing so far is great. Town is horribly crowded. Parking is not available. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE It's not government responsibility to provide housing in this instance. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE I have lived here through a series of booms and busts and the market is sometimes saturated with rental housing. I am happy for the locals who have been able to buy homes in Vail, but I do not favor the town's involvement in housing. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE I don't disagree with the entire statement. I believe that things in the town of Vail should be with Eagle County and not just the town of Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 331 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 14 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Government is not in the business to supply housing for businesses in this county or town. Government employees-yes. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Government involvement has consequences on the marketplace. The supply of available affordable housing is increasing as we speak outside the town of Vail. Why? Demand. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED REFUSED NOT TOO MUCH SOMEWHAT DISAGREE As previously mentioned, I feel that too much focus is placed on having that housing within the town limits of where one is working. I am not opposed to deed- restricted housing; however, I feel strongly that this housing does not have to be immediately within the same town. I think it is VERY reasonable to have deed-restricted housing within a short commute. This is something that seems to have been lost on the Town of Vail when discussing deed- restricted homes. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE It should only be in the Town of Vail. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE "Reasonable" is a term subject to interpretation--many things the Town of Vail has done recently are not in my view "reasonable" Also the private sector (i.e. VR) need to do much more re: workforce housing. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Government should not be in the housing business. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Disagree with the restrictions to the Town of Vail. Avon, etc ? June 18, 2019 - Page 332 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 15 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Deed restricted unit harm re-sale value in the condo community that it the unit resides. Also why is it the governments responsibility to house employees of local businesses? You are using my tax dollars to solve a problem that is the responsibility of the business owners. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Local government should not be in the real estate market. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Should be outside scope of responsibilities. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE This question implies Town of Vail should generate housing within its city limits. This issue should be addressed within the full corridor East Vail to Gypsum and all communities need to come together and participate. This will take leadership. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Vail Health and Vail Resorts should be paying the bulk of the cost of providing more deed restricted housing. Town of Vail can be a partner but should not shoulder the majority of the financial burden. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Seems to me that the town and resort make money on both sides of the decal and still use tax dollars for housing. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE It is more of an emotional thing. I think people should take jobs that can support where they live. I don't think that just because they work here and in Denver that they shouldn't plan for both housing and work. June 18, 2019 - Page 333 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 16 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Privately built deed restricted housing would be better. The burden should be on the employers with the town providing quidelines. Vail resorts, Hospital etc. should contribute. It should not be built on the frontage road in East Vail, it is already too congested. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE It should be a private sector responsibility. If the Town provides housing it lets the private sector off the hook. But I'm ok with a 'minor' effort by the Government if it is aimed at housing for hourly or low paid workers. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE I think the local government should be involved in helping but I feel strongly that Vail Resorts should be taking a stronger lead. However I am totally against VR building in East VaiI and disturbing the wildlife habitat in that area. June 18, 2019 - Page 334 of 404 "..Why do you DISAGREE with the viewpoint that local governments in mountain resort communities should make reasonable efforts to maintain and increase the supply of available deed-restricted homes for residents." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 17 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM AGREE/DISAGREE COMMUNITY EFFORT VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE Deed restricted properties are still not attractive to me as a homebuyer because I'm recent history in Colorado homeowners are seeing better increases in home value then the capped annual increase that seed restricted properties allow. This effectively limits the amount of return I can see on an investment in deed restricted properties and makes them unappealing. Additionally, for the same price I can get a deed restricted property in Vail I can move further away and have more square footage and average in addition to a better return on investment. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT DISAGREE At some point employers, not the town, need to step up. And as someone who scrimped and saved for YEARS I don't want my own propert value diluted. (Further, everyone I know who bought deed- restricted left income of assets off their application. Just saying.) June 18, 2019 - Page 335 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a sales tax rather than a property tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 1 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX It may be selfish but it makes sense to have our economy supported by our large tourism base rather than the primary home owners. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX We have a lot more tourists coming in. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX Easier. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX A couple of reasons. 1. I think you may have a very difficult time getting people to vote in favor of a property tax, particularly in light of the newest round of assessments that just came out. 2. I think that it is important not only for our residents but also visitors to buy into the idea that housing is infrastructure. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX Actually I would support both. I don't feel comfortable saying property tax even though I think it should be a property tax and properties over a certain amount. We already pay an arm and a leg for a very modest condo in East vail and we are a permanent family. It?s not fair to Tax is but it is fair to tax the $4 million houses across the street from us and next-door where nobody lives. It should not come off the backs of people looking for or are able to buy housing here which is a struggle to begin with. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX Not sure if this is correct but my impression is that with sales tax the tourist dollar would be more responsible for funding the tax over local dollar - seems more fair to me because the tourism is what prices locals out of the market. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX Our property taxes went up by 35 percent this year. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX Driven by visitors. June 18, 2019 - Page 336 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a sales tax rather than a property tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 2 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX I own a home [selfish reasons] which is worth more than I expected so lucky but also find tax burdensome [a little] and would prefer tax increases to go to schools at least till tabor overturned when the state can do it's job of funding colorado education. Also a sales tax slows down consumption which is good as we are consuming the world, though as luxury ski resort we're on the wrong end of that argument anyway. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX Spread the base of support to all households benefiting from adequate workforce. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX Visitors to Vail should help support town employees who provide services to them. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX Higher tax. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG SALES TAX Involves everyone including the tourist in a tourism driven town! MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SALES TAX We are tourists based and let them help support our needs because they use and abuse the valley. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SALES TAX It would include more people. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SALES TAX Our guests will bear the brunt and hardly notice it. MALE REFUSED REPUBLICAN OWN BIG SALES TAX The increase in property taxes further burdens the local worker living in Vail which is already a strain for most financially. A sales tax puts that cost/burden more on the tourist than the local which seems more appropriate. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX More money out of it, if I'm correct. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX There are less sales with the local property owners or residents of Vail. I am offended. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX Sales tax will capture all the visitors who come to the valley, which is why everything is so expensive in this county. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX I think it would spread the burden more evenly than taxing only property owners. June 18, 2019 - Page 337 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a sales tax rather than a property tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 3 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX I would support both but the sales tax forces all visitors to pay for housing so there can be employees that serve all guests and residents. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX We already did this with the convention center fund raising effort and it worked. If we tax property owners the push back will be significantly not in taxation's favor. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX Because the transaction costs can be spread over the sale of many of the high end properties that are sold in Vail. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX I believe a sales tax would "spread" the funding source among all individuals who benefit from the end result of increased attainable housing - including local residents and guests. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX Everyone contributes to solving the housing crisis. I do support doing both a sales tax and a property tax increase. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX Yes FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG SALES TAX Then Visitors are involved too not just the locals. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG SALES TAX Have everyone who benefits from this place pay back a little. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG SALES TAX Property tax raises the rent of the locals trying to make it. Sales tax raises the tax for locals, as well as the tourists and visitors to Vail. This is a benefit as it's hard enough to make rent in Eagle County (which according to Forbes magazine is the most expensive place in the COUNTRY to own a home) without adding a tax that the landlord will then pass down. If everyone helps out a little, in a sales tax increase, then we have the benefit of our tourists helping with the problem. June 18, 2019 - Page 338 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a sales tax rather than a property tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 4 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG SALES TAX If tourists want people running their chairlifts, serving their meals, cleaning their hotel rooms, treating their injuries at the hospital, etc, then the tourists should also pay for other amenities necessary for the service economy workers to exist here (not just our wages). On the other hand, increasing property tax will trickle down to tenants as an increase in rent!! If it is implemented as a property tax, homeowners who rent to long-term residents MUST be exempted (like a temporary deed restriction) to incentivize workforce renting instead of short-term renting or letting units sit unoccupied. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG SALES TAX Tax the people that make the area unaffordable. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG SALES TAX Because property tax would increase would then lead to my landlord increasing my rent! MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG SALES TAX The sales tax would send money to everyone who visits. The people who live here don't pay for it at all. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG SALES TAX Property taxes are for people who own a home. MALE 18-34 OTHER RENT BIG SALES TAX Not sure. FEMALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG SALES TAX Both of them would be logical, but I just think the majority of the funds from a sales tax would come from visitors who don't live there, so it wouldn't hurt the property owners. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SALES TAX The sales tax is a much better option because the Town of Vail supported by people visiting the mountain. If we choose a property tax it would be counter productive when trying to place more people from the community in these homes at affordable prices. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SALES TAX We should leverage the money that the tourists are bringing in. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SALES TAX Tax the visitors. Workers have less impact from a v as il tax as we dont live in vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 339 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a sales tax rather than a property tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 5 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SALES TAX A property tax means that I own the house. We have a shit ton of people who come here on vacation and pay a sales tax rather than a property tax. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SALES TAX Not sure, but it might generate greater tax revenue than just a property tax. Many spend freely while vacationing in Vail and the resort is becoming a year round destination. Seize this moment by implementing a sales tax to support the continued growth of truly affordably priced deed restricted housing. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SALES TAX In that way, we will be getting that money from a great majority of tourists. Whereas the property taxes, if we increase those taxes, local people have less of a chance to buy properties in Vail because of exorbitant prices in real estate. So might as well, they tax the tourists considering they are coming for vacations. Tourists are wealthy. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG SALES TAX 1) A tax on sales of everything or just sales of property? 2) would it include a tax on hotel beds or simply a purchase of hard goods? A sales tax would continue the funding for Vail inDeed even if home sales decrease or the market bottoms out. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCHSALES TAX I would worry that a property tax would drive down home prices. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCHSALES TAX The sales tax is paid by anybody who is in Vail, which includes the economic based and tourists. The tourists are the people the employee housing facilitates. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCHSALES TAX The problem stems from local business not paying a living wage. The fix should come from people requiring services. Sales tax, lodging tax, etc. June 18, 2019 - Page 340 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a sales tax rather than a property tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 6 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED SALES TAX I think a sales tax would encourage our community to buy local, knowing where that extra tax is going. It would also allow us to benefit from Vail's tourism. Peoples vacations depend on the employees in vail. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED SALES TAX It will place the costs on the people passing through and vacationing in the town rather than putting all the costs on the people who live here. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX The property tax is geared toward the locals while anyone who is buying anything in Vail will bring in more money. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX All visitors to valley help support employees in need. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX I believe this will provide the best opportunity to raise these funds. It also taps into funding from the numerous tourists and visitors to the town. Ultimately, they will be the biggest benefactors of this housing. Happier locals makes for happier visitors. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX Because I believe that property taxes are very high and getting higher. I think even a lodging tax would be better. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX It is the guests who come to our valley that create the need for housing and a sales tax is more likely to burden them. I also think more lodging taxes could be used to pay for it. FEMALE REFUSED DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX I think it would be easier to get and the property taxes are so high to begin with.... MALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX The need for employees is driven by the service nature of the tourism ecosystem. Taxing property is a shotgun solution that ensnares locals as well as 2nd home owners. A sales tax would target those directly responsible for the need. June 18, 2019 - Page 341 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a sales tax rather than a property tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 7 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX I think it is because, off the top of my head, all of the visitors who come to Vail will contribute with the sales tax dollars and not just the property owners. Also the visitors will contribute. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX The property taxes are going up. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX More people contribute. If you don't own a home you are still contributing as a community. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT SALES TAX The primary beneficiary of affordable housing is the tourism industry serving our visitors. These visitors should contribute to the expense of house the people serving them. It will be a smaller amount spread among more people. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT SALES TAX Helps finance this from both residents and tourists that visit. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT SALES TAX The property taxes are high enough. The sales tax would be easier to manage. June 18, 2019 - Page 342 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a property tax rather than a sales tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 1 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Only want to affect those living in Vail. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Sales taxes are already very high. Property taxes bring income to the second homeowners. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Sales tax is already too high. I would support an additional tax on VRBO. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Personal preference. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Easier on my budget. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Would tax commercial and second home owners. Could exempt full time residents employed in Eagle County. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX It has less of an impact on guests. FEMALE 18-34 OTHER OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Sales taxes are passed on to the customers when the prices in Vail are already high. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX I think too many properties are off the market due to short term rentals (VRBO). They should also pay property taxes to support housing. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX A very large number of second homes exists in the area, especially Vail. The fact that those homes are vacant most of the time has contributed to the housing crisis we now face. As a homeowner, i'm willing to pay my share to help make Vail more sustainable for the long term. June 18, 2019 - Page 343 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a property tax rather than a sales tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 2 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX I feel like residents in Vail would not feel or see the day to day impacts of a property taxes as they might on a sales tax, because this tax would be benefiting the people who are interested in the VHA mission to get their own affordable place to live in because they do not currently own property or pay that property tax, while they are actually still buying groceries and other items daily where the sales tax would be more noticeable. If that person does obtain a property or housing help as a result of that property tax. I think it's only reasonable to pay that forward and it's less notable spaced out of mortgage escrow or yearly property tax payment. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Property values are the cause of our housing issues. We should tax the properties that are causing the issue. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Vail's mill levy is low. It should have been raised for any number of other important issues in the last 20 years. Yes - huge homes will pay more. Those homes require services year-round, whether they are occupied or not. Those services need employees. Those employees need a place to live that isn't down valley or Leadville or Summit Cty or... There is already too much reliance on sales tax. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Those that create the most impact on local housing supply and prices (i.e. vacation home owners and business owners) will bear the brunt of the cost. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Sales tax is already high. It is appropriate for a tax to create more homes for locals to come from property. I don't have a problem having second homeowners contribute to this cause. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX Sales tax is already too high. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG PROPERTY TAX I would support either tax, but property tax is probably more equitable. June 18, 2019 - Page 344 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a property tax rather than a sales tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 3 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG PROPERTY TAX Not all people who purchase things in Vail live in Vail. Therefore there is no need to charge a non-resident for the benefits of residents in Vail. MALE 35-44 REFUSED REFUSED BIG PROPERTY TAX Because houses should pay for houses. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG PROPERTY TAX The people that need these home spend money at the stores where they would pay sales tax. The people that own large, unoccupied homes don't. Tax the wealthier people how you can, property tax. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX Majority of people here are second homeowners. I would rather raise money through the people who don't live here, than the people who do. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX The people who own houses here need to pay the taxes toward the community rather than the rest of us who don't own property, but have lived here long-term. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX It would bring more revenue. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX If many homes in town are second homes with seasonal residents that own them then a property tax assures that their money is staying within the community. If it is a sales tax then the owners who are rarely here and who are contributing to the housing problem are not the ones being taxed. Instead it is year round locals and tourists who will take the brunt of the tax increase. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX Because the rental and seasonal property owners would also have to pay for it. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX It is important that all home buyers [especially 2nd or 3rd home owners] contribute to the overall housing issue. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX It's geared towards housing. Being invested by owning a property and wanting to help the housing problem. June 18, 2019 - Page 345 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a property tax rather than a sales tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 4 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX Most of Vail's home owners are multi multi millionaires and the property is there second or third home. We need housing for Town of Vail employees who actually live and work here. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX Leave the locals alone and tax the owners of empty, unrented homes. I support a property tax on homes that sit empty. MALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX The property tax is too low for our community. Almost non- existent. Should even incorporate into employee pay. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX A lot of the very expensive second homes in Vail could add additional funds at a proportional value. It is even though the owners are never here. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX Should not affect the daily lives of people but rather a luxury tax on people who own property. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX The sales tax effects the local population. It is the rich property owners that have caused the housing issue. It should be the property owners that pay for the problems they have created. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX Because most property owners in Vail are filthy rich and can afford to pay a few more thousand a year. Their the ones who inflated the market. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX It's more reasonable to me. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX There are so many second home owners here that are using their homes sporadically or renting (or worse, short term renting them on air bnb) taking units away from employee usage. We should not burden our tourists with an additional sales tax, we already have a fairly high tax rate. However, that cost should be passed on to those who 'live' here. They are the business owners and operators, so it should be their cost to bear. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX Because they can afford it. June 18, 2019 - Page 346 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a property tax rather than a sales tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 5 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX No comment. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX The sales tax is a lodging tax. It would hurt the tourism. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX I think our sales tax is high enough. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX So many 2nd+ homeowners in the valley with often unoccupied homes should help more than renters. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX Tax second home owners that profit from VRBO and have driven up the prices. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG PROPERTY TAX Tourists shouldn't pay for local's housing. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT PROPERTY TAX Because as of Oklahoma under the property tax increase will be minimal. Sales tax increase will affect everything across the board including groceries gas excetera. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED SOMEWHAT PROPERTY TAX I believe part of the root of the problem is second and third homeowners who have relatively low property taxes and aren't in town enough to contribute to the sales tax base measureably. We already tax our visitors at a ratio that is high, this is designed in my opinion in part to keep property taxes low.. most areas have a higher property tax to sales tax ratio and I believe this is the best way to improve revenues in order to improve infrastructure and subsidize housing. MALE REFUSED REFUSED REFUSED SOMEWHAT PROPERTY TAX Most people use Vail as a second, third, or fourth home. They do not spend a great deal of time in vail, but we still have to protect and maintain their homes and cities the save as a year round resident. These people reap all of the benefits, but do not have to pay for them. The property tax is nothing to these individuals in the bigger picture, there is no reason our property taxes should be as low as they are for houses that cost as much as they do. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT PROPERTY TAX It might be a better way to get the funds for it. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT PROPERTY TAX Honestly, there are a lot of empty homes here throughout out the year. They should pay higher property taxes. June 18, 2019 - Page 347 of 404 "In your own words, please tell me why you would support a property tax rather than a sales tax." Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 6 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM TAX TYPE VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT PROPERTY TAX Part of the housing problem is that people buy 2nd / 3rd / 4th homes here which leaves less inventory for people who want to live here year-round. By taxing that market, the people creating the problem are having to contribute to the solution. I'd also be interested in seeing funds raised through a lodging tax. Lodging takes space that otherwise could have potentially had housing on it and those lodging guests require services from people who can't live in Vail because there is a hotel someplace that an apartment complex could have been built. Raising sales tax would target more people, but you already have residents complaining because they don't adequately budget their money to afford housing, so raising the sales tax will just increase their problem / complaints. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT PROPERTY TAX Property tax pertains to property owners, which the majority in the Town of Vail are secondary homeowners. People who are secondary home owners are initially pushing out locals in order for them to visit our town only a few weeks out of the year. I believe that since these homeowners are abundant, they can assist more in making affordable housing that way there can be a community when they decide to visit, instead of visiting a resort. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT PROPERTY TAX Sales tax further impacts those who already can't afford to live here. Property tax would impact those who can already afford to live here. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT PROPERTY TAX The people benefiting it will be the people buying it. It should affect the market for the better. June 18, 2019 - Page 348 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 1 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG More options within more prices. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG I have no opinions. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Do sales tax and property tax. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG There needs to be more real estate options. They should be more focused on what they are asking the people to pay. There needs to be more affordable housing here. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG No FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Tax out of state home owners and short term rentals, not local home owners. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Whatever you do, it needs to be affordable. It is common knowledge that most businesses pay lower wages here. The average person can not afford the current options. Also you need to think about families. You want to keep people here but by allowing a single person to buy 3 bedroom deed restricted house to are eliminating an opportunity for a family that sends their kids to red sandstone and is involved in the community. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Would love to see another Chamonix type project in Vail. Single family type homes are not affordable for even a professional couple with one child. People in our situation make too much for some lower income housing options but not enough to afford $750,000. We were involved with the Chamonix project and it was a great experience even though we ended up not following through with the purchase. The inDeed project sounds great but we haven?t done a ton of research into it yet. I think you are doing a good job giving the difficulties you face. Thank you. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Nope, there is nothing. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Focus on outlawing/restricting short term rentals. If the town doesn't outlaw short term rentals, at least charge the owners hotel taxes. Increase the tax rate on 2nd home owners and decrease the tax rate on primary residents. This would drive down the price of real estate and should be the towns primary focus. June 18, 2019 - Page 349 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 2 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG For future projects I strongly believe we need to keep these affordable. Below $300k starting is where I see this mark. If you build more Chamonix style homes it does not help our front line valued employees that keep this wonderful place running. With this moving to a more transient style community we are loosing some very good people. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG No FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG No comment. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Already shared. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG As mentioned above, I hope that Vail resorts and other large employers in the valley do more to address the housing needs of seasonal and long term employees. I applaud the partnership between the Sonanalp and the town, I feel that VR could do more. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG In order to support the housing goals, locals (full-time residents) should NOT be taxed either through sales tax or property taxes. Why tax those who already live here and make it even more difficult. A 1 mill increase seems small. However, we've had several 1 mill increases for this and that the past few years. They add together annually and add up over time. Rather than taxing the locals, why not add a tax on the hotels and restaurants? Have those who are causing the need for more people to live here to pay for the housing for the workers. I STRONGLY oppose any tax for housing that the locals have to bear. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Seems like Vail is doing more than the other towns. But we are still far behind. June 18, 2019 - Page 350 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 3 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG The same thing as always, we live in 800 ft.² permanently a family of three and have lived in Vail for over 20 years both my husband and I. It is not fair that our friends and family have to move down valley and pay just about as much for only a little more room. Why aren't there more families living around us? Why isn't it filled with locals, couples, families, and people that live here permanently? Some streets are like a ghost town the most you see our contractors and caretakers trucks. There should be larger homes available for less than half $1 million. I know that's a dream. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG You all may need to make some hard decisions, choosing one "priority" from the Town's mission, vision, and values to make another "priority" happen. I appreciate all of the goals that y'all have, but believe that Housing should be at the very TOP of your agenda. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG There is nothing at this time. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Fund more. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG I understand the town of Vail isn't Vail Resorts, but we need to pressure the resort to pay a living wage. Not enough locals to fill those job opportunities. Also, a community needs a recreational facility. The Cascade is falling apart. Vrd needs to buy it. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Not at this time. I appreciate you all taking the time to reach out to the community and ask for our opinions. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG The lottery system was broken but new system is no better. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG The tax implemented for housing should be levied upon those owners who benefit from short term rentals and who have taken their properties off the market for employees. Levy the tax on those who have created the problem. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG No suggestions. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Raising ANY tax is the last thing Town of Vail should do. June 18, 2019 - Page 351 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 4 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG residents are going to oppose a tax increase not because of the cost but because they don't want employee housing built near them and use the tax as an excuse. That is what you have to address how deed restricted neighbors are cool what they do for neighborhood why we are being selfish bastards in opposing it. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Vail Indeed gets the town the most bang for the buck. I'm open to the tax increases but would rather see the town use the Real Estate Transfer Tax and look at selling Timber Ridge if it is deed restricted to stay as rental property. I still have the Buyer for Timber Ridge - Pete Seibert MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Very important for private/public partnerships. Housing Authority should have done a better job educating the Town Council as they obviously didn't understand the East Vail proposal. Terrible council decision. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Good, affordable housing for employees is a positive for Vail's continued success as a destination resort and good place to live. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Just do it -but not in environmentally sensitive areas. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG No FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG There is resistance to spending maximum $$ on employee housing inside Town of Vail limits when Avon and Minturn offer lower land costs and could be on Public transportation routes for employee accessibility to jobs and services. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG They are making more homes available to Hispanic workers. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Keep up the good work and obtain/ deed restrict more units. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG No comment. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG No MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG No MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG What specific program and/or staffing needs will the increase in funding support? June 18, 2019 - Page 352 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 5 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN BIG Absolutely, they should not build affordable housing at the East Vail exit. They should build it in the town, if they can find a site or build it somewhere else in the county and get businesses to get involved in the same way as the Sonnenalp is. By all means, Vail resorts should be encouraged or required to do more. FEMALE 18-34 OTHER OWN BIG They could solicit private investments. FEMALE 35-44 OTHER OWN BIG Please don't increase taxes and please stop buying up property for deed restrictions. These are not the creative solutions. Building more and improving transportation is a better option. FEMALE 45-54 OTHER OWN BIG Let the private sector work. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN BIG As a resident of the Chamonix Vail housing project, the quality control on the project was not worth the price tag of the home. Additionally the Town of Vail missed the mark on the "need" of the community. There were over 60 families interested in the 2-1 homes while other unit types had barely enough interest to fill the quota. I hope that more affordable homes are considered to be built that they meet the need a little better. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN BIG If the idea is that you need to find funding, the way to fund that is to get money from tourists who come in with hotel packs and other things. They need to acquire funding from sources, other than the residents in Vail. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN BIG There also needs to be rentals that are affordable aside from deed restricted housing. And I think Vail should be responsible to provide this . FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN BIG You are going in the wrong direction to penalize the current residents by increasing sales tax and property tax. You need to tax areas where the locals are not financially responsible such as a "second home tax" for any homeowner who does not have their permanent residence in Eagle County. You could also increase tax on lift tickets, hotels and other purchases so that the locals are not stuck carrying more financial burden. June 18, 2019 - Page 353 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 6 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN BIG Again- make sure they give correct information to current neighbor residents as to how the new project will look. This was NOT the case in the Chamonix project and that is disappointing! FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN BIG Really need to figure this out. Other cities have. How can businesses survive without employees. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG I truly wonder if certain residents that were qualified for the Chamonix units really needed those units and believe that they could have afforded another option for housing without knocking more qualified locals out of the running for those units. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG When you develop more properties, you need more that are similar to Timber Ridge with a lot of 1 bedrooms so higher density. The Chamonix development, is way too nice with too many larger townhouses in it. Giving people garages when you could have had additional smaller units where the garages were located at Chamonix (you could have put in attractive outdoor storage units for storage) would have been a lot better use of maximizing the number of units as you could have put a studio or something like that where the garage was located. To fund projects, you could add an additional "resort tax" to tourists instead of wanting local Vail residents to fund these housing projects. MALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN BIG Do not approve new housing projects in critical wildlife habitat. Animals live or die by our choices. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN BIG Town of Vail should limit short term rentals to a minimum of 30 days. I think that would open up rentals for employees, and put more properties on the market. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN BIG Housing should be as close to where the employees work. Individual interests should not decide where the housing is located, although they should be listened to and taken in consideration with all the issues. June 18, 2019 - Page 354 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 7 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN BIG Do not ever sell the land to private developers. We have already spent too much money to buy back employee housing land at Timber Ridge. Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN BIG Build bigger and smarter for affordable housing. Require more from the business community. Make sure all short term vacation rental units pay fees and taxes. Give a break to local homeowners that can verify they rent to those that are locally employed. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG No comment. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Nothing that I did not already say. Thanks. FEMALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG They new lottery process for Vail Commons takes away the seniority that a long time resident deserves over someone new to the valley. Additionally the process has become long and complex compared to the previous method. If this is the system the Housing Authority continues using it will dissuade me from voting to increase their funding. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Why are rich people allowed to get in on deed-restricted places? Income limits are needed on both sides of that process. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG I am not sure if this is pertinent, but we continue to build very expensive homes in the Vail area which drives up housing pricing and pushes locals down valley or out of the valley, should there be a special tax on a home that is above a certain price point to help fund deed-restricted affordable housing? This seems like an idea that could help out with funding. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Of course everyone loves to live in Vail proper. There are too many condos popping up everywhere! Put employee housing in Avon or Edwards near a bus stop. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG No, I think the town of Vail and Vail resorts should work together to create affordable housing. June 18, 2019 - Page 355 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 8 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Every time a local government imposes new impact fees, the rents of a given project must go up to achieve the same returns as before. The town of Eagle's decision to impose a fee for police is a perfect example of what not to do. Instead of spreading this expense among all community members, the town has decided to impose it only on new development. It may be no big deal for a large single family home. But that's not what we need more of. We need more multifamily for-sale and rental projects. Imposing this kind of fee on new projects will make some of them no longer feasible. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Keep working towards strategies to offer housing to locals in the Vail Valley. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG I have no comments right now. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG They should keep doing what they a doing, buy vacant lands, and build more units with parking. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG I believe finding a balance of my afore mentioned issues is extremely important to preserve our community as one that is navigable to locals and tourists, friendly to the environment but also offers our local businesses a chance to thrive by providing for its employees. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Purchase the Roost land and put employe Housing there! FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG The hardest thing is that the people living in the spaces provided do not always take care of the premises. If you continue with deed- restricted housing (changing my understanding that the people living in the housing are renters not owners) someone needs to monitor the renters to make sure the housing is taken care and the people who get it appreciate what is being provided. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG We certainly need affordable housing but I do not approve of building if it effects a wildlife habitat such as East Vail. I've lived in Vail for 40 years and the big horn sheep herds are dwindling. It seems we have forgotten why we moved here. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG That will be fine. June 18, 2019 - Page 356 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 9 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Chamonix was a slap in the face to most workers in the town of Vail. So many were excited about this project. Only to see the ridiculous prices associated with that project. We Do Not Need Another Chamonix!! MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Keep it up. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN BIG I think that local housing authority is on the right track and their heart is in the right place. They need to listen to the businesses of Vail because lots of employees are lost because of housing being non- existent in Vail. They need to stay out of politics, go back, revisit Airbnb, and not allow them into Vail. It is the number one culprit of housing issues in Vail. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Middle management is so burnt out being short staffed that they are leaving. The folks that replace them know little or nothing about Vail and what it took to build this place. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG Property tax should not be used to finance deed restriction housing. Sales tax and a business tax are the areas that directly benefit from affordable housing. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN BIG No, I don't have any. MALE REFUSED REPUBLICAN OWN BIG The decision to not partner and deed restrict the East Vail Housing project was an absolute failure and because of that I will be voting against all members of council that opposed the request. This was an excellent low cost per unit way to spend tax payer money to support and improve local housing and would have been fully within the mission of the Housing Authority and it's a shame to see that squandered. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG No MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Condos are great but single family homes in the program would be even better. June 18, 2019 - Page 357 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 10 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG DRB and planning are way too intense and difficult for local homeowners to work with. We want to improve our units but everything is difficult and expensive to get approved - we are not all 2nd homeowners with unlimited budgets. Be more reasonable with the planning and DRB processes. Most true locals do everything they can to avoid these processes. It is odd that this email came from George Ruther and not the 'Town of Vail'. This should be a Town of Vail initiative and not focused around one person. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I do not support an increase in property or sales tax to fund the Vail Local Housing Authority. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I was disappointed in the change to how the lottery system works for the existing deed-restricted units. I believe there should be a 5 year minimum resident requirement to be in the lottery for places such as Vail Commons just to ensure less change over and to keep the pricing down. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG We should improve our public transportation so that the people can live there as well. We should have better transit. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG That would be the pressure on local businesses to increase pay. I think multi-dwelling housing is the way to go. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Again, we don't need fifth home owners no matter how many billions they have in their bank accounts. If you live here at least 6 months - great. But how does Vail gain from people living in their own home for 2-3 weeks a year? MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I may be more willing to support a sales tax increase if the sales tax code also changed what is taxable. Taxing necessities like groceries and utilities has a disproportionate, negative impact on lower income families. An average family of 4 would spend between $304 - $601 per year in sales tax on groceries in Vail, based on data from the USDA. Allowing a family to retain these funds goes very far someone earning $40k per year, vs 2 or 3 times that amount. June 18, 2019 - Page 358 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 11 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG The lottery system needs to be restructured based on seniority/points. It need to go back to a list without tiers. There is no reason to have a drawing and involve luck in any way. It may be fun for someone to draw keys out of a miniature house but if someone gets a house that has fewer points than another that is just wrong! MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG The mechanism for funding can come from the commercial sector. Ask all business owners with a team in excess of 10 to participate. Scale the ask based on total team size, the larger the company/business, the greater the financial requirement. Allow for exemptions for those who provide housing for their staff. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG We need to move forward on this. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Nothing comes to mind. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG If they truly are looking to find affordable housing for the members of Vail properties, they need to stand by the mandates or restrictions they set for those affordable housing because there are too many people who do not follow the requirements and take away from the people who could be using those based on those requirements. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG A better way to monitor the HOA in these deed restricted homes, would be great. Between the mortgage and HOA fees, some of the deed restricted homes are still pretty expensive. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I was happy to learn that Vail purchased housing in Edwards. I'm a full- time resident who works hard to make a living here and raise our kids. I'm in a Bald Mountain Townhome we purchased in 2008 at top value. I've been paying a big mortgage and my home value has not returned to our purchase price. I was a little angry when one of our units was just converted to deed-restricted. It makes me feel like now my place will never come back. I have been watching giant new homes popup throughout East Vail. I get it. Normal folks do not live in those homes. I'm personally counting on the high-end development of Vail to bring up the value of my little place. Please don't crush that possibility. June 18, 2019 - Page 359 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 12 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I'll follow any updates regarding these issues. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Please strive to keep all ages in Vail. My kids' friends from down valley don't know Vail has a farmers' market, hardly ski Vail Mtn, etc. etc. It can't just be wealthy retirees who love the active lifestyle. Where's the annual "freshman class" who live/hangout/recreate in Vail and then (some) choose to stay? FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG sales tax is already high in Vail, so would not like to see it increased. Property tax increase also affects current residents who live full time, so would not like to see that increase. Possible tax increase on parking, hotels, short term rentals (the biggest cause of this issue!!) FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Vail Chamonix deed restricted housing was toted for years prior to its? development that it would be AFFORDABLE. In the end it was not and feel that was the wrong direction for the Town of Vail. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Consider the 2.0% transfer tax for housing. it's a more pressing need in the town and aligns better with how that money is generated. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I do think the council is taking the correct approach in this issue, and I realize that (as with anything!) the funding will be the crux of the issue for most people. I would urge the council to consider any and all possible sources of revenue to create funding for housing for residents. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG It is a community wide problem that affects residents, guests, merchants, and anyone visiting the Town. Everyone has a role to play in funding housing. It is not just a developer problem. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Support for tax increases would be based on the language included in the issue. June 18, 2019 - Page 360 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 13 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG The Council and Housing Authority are putting the cart before the horse. Come up with some concrete projects AND THEN come to ask for money. Buzzard Park is ideal Timber Creek would be ideal. The purchase of units in Edwards and requiring residents there to work in Vail was just stupid - it creates a reverse commute adding to congestion and pollution and it doesn't do anything to help Vail shops and restaurants. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG We need to make a plan, set a goal, protect it from veto, and execute it. We have beat around the proverbial bush for too many years and our time to do this in an affordable setting has already come and gone. It costs are only going to escalate the longer we drag our feet. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Feed back I hear in the community regarding the Vail InDEED program has been very positive. This program has allowed several first time home buyers to opportunity to purchase a home in Vail which can then be a long term investment for the owner should they wish to move from Vail and rent their deed restricted unit. It is helping to reduce short term rentals. I wouldn't want to see STR go away just not take opportunities away from locals who want to live in Vail. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I support the Town of Vail's housing initiatives. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I think the Chamonix project was a great idea. However, the cost to purchase was limiting to many young adults, couples and families. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG If the ERWS can help their employees with housing- the Town of Vail should be able to as well. This is just one example. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG No FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG The town should not increase taxes, locals can't afford current taxes let alone housing. Find a solution with private builders, Vail Resorts and state government to provide a solution for local housing of residents. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG There are not enough family-oriented workforce housing units. We need more of the larger units rather than 1 or 2 bedrooms. June 18, 2019 - Page 361 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 14 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG I have been living in town working off and on for the last 6 years and skiing Vail since 1968. My parents moved from Golden and retired in Vail. The availability in our ?family home? is the only way that I would even consider trying to be here and may not stay because its too costly. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Limit STR MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Not at this time, with regard to increases in tax to pay for housing. In order to say yes I would need to know what is actually proposed. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG The Towns direction on the potential East Vail housing development, with lack of consideration for nature or residents in the area, has me very concerned about the towns direction on employee housing. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG With both options, sales and property tax, be as aggressive as possible. Funding is extremely important so please push the limits a little. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG No FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG We also could use a recreational center like promised long time ago live in Vail but have to drive to Avon the closest. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG It is vital to set up a permanent funding source for housing. It should be steady. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG Let's look beyond the borders of Vail. It is one valley one community most of the supporting workforce population does not and will not live in vail. Maybe the discussion of annexing Eagle-Vail should get back to the forfront. June 18, 2019 - Page 362 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 15 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG In order to retain a workforce we NEED better housing options. We NEED pet friendly single family homes. A young family should be able to afford a placed called home. Family?s don't want to live in stacked sardine cans. The local housing authority needs to reevaluate what they think ?affordable? housing is! When there are 30+ people who apply for one two bedroom unit in the Vail Commons the housing authority really needs to evaluate how bad the housing crisis is! It is shameful that the town/county would allow for such a low number of available options with such high demand. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG So Town of Vail "affordable" housing units (Chominix) range from 400k- 700k? Not affordable for working class, obviously. And large percentage of people purchasing these units are scamming the system ( own other real estate in the valley and use Town of Vail housing while Airbnb their properties). Town of Vail clueless. Vail Resorts (merchants) need to buck up and provide housing down valley (minturn, Eagle Vail, Edwards). Long term (working class) rentals disappearing caused by VRBO, Airbnb. You all (Town of Vail commissioners) know the story but afraid to press the issue with VR. Grow a set. June 18, 2019 - Page 363 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 16 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN BIG When the Vail Indeed program was implements as a pilot program the Town Council was going to evaluate the success and viability of the program after the initial funding. To date I have seen no evidence that thyis has occurred. Claims were made by the housing authority that over time a cost basis for a deed restriction should be able to be determined. Again, no evaluation has been made. Most of the Authority meetings have extensive executive sessions where the major decisions are made. There is virtually no transparency. Other town board meeting are televised. The Authority meetings are not. No comprehensive list of purchases has been assembled detailing exactly what has been purchased and for how much. Some questionable board actions on the Chamonix property have occurred the past year or so that that bring the integrity of the authority into question. The Town Council needs to force the Authority to be more transparent and ethical. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG No MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG Nope but thank you. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT REFUSED BIG Take a breath and let the market decide… MALE 35-44 REFUSED REFUSED BIG You should not pursue homes in Edwards for people in Vail. Get more Vail homes for Vail employees. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG Fix the issue with short term rentals. AIRBNB and VRBO killed the mountain town. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG Focus on lots of deed restricted properties. Fuck the free market, don't even waste your time on it. Let the wealthy people duke it out in the free market. and good luck! FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG I can't support something that will no bring me direct benefit, I've been searching for an affordable place to leave myself. Is not reasonable to support tax increase when I am unable to get housing myself. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED REFUSED BIG No comment. June 18, 2019 - Page 364 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 17 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG As a young resident of the Vail Valley, I would like to fulfill my dream of buying a home here. I am a business owner and involved in the community. If this initiative can help me achieve this goal, I'm on board! FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Keep in mind that employees are what make Vail what it is. Without employees CEO's would have to get down and dirty. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG No FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Please continue to strive to improve the housing situation in EC. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG See previous comments FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Spread awareness about these programs, Vail inDeed, housing lottery, etc. because most of us are unaware the necessary steps to take. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG The town of Vail needs to recognize that to the majority of workers in the valley, $500,000 or even $400,000 is not an affordable housing option. I know families living with 10 people in a 2 bedroom home. This is common. $200,000, maybe? We're not all billionaires and Im lucky enough to be able to afford $2,000 a month for a 1 bedroom but it's disgusting how much rent and housing has gone up. We. need. more. deed. restricted COMMUNITIES, not 1 row of houses (chamonix). FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG The question of sales tax versus property taxes is like comparing apples to oranges. There should be assistance programs for first-time buyers, rather than providing housing. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG A $600,000 condo is not affordable housing. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Finding affordable housing in Vail shouldn't be such an issue. Fix the problem and send us the bill. Come on! June 18, 2019 - Page 365 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 18 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG For most people in America the thought of a 350,000-500,000 2 bedroom condo is absurd. I understand that is the cost of living in a successful and amazing place in america. However, I fear that these costs are driving talent and a sense of community away. As a renter in Vail at two locations in recent year I have had no neighbors and have heard how impossible it is to find a place to live so many times. Vail needs holiday homes, I get it. But there is a huge struggle to find any sense of community while living here and that is mostly due to the transient nature of ski towns and it doubles down when people that want to live here long term can't because they are out priced or outbid in the housing market. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG No MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG When a counsel member states that affordable housing is not for everyone and states that it is for doctors and lawers... That is not affordable housing. Get your shit together. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG The people who own houses here but don't live here long-term need to support the community through property taxes because of their desire to own a house in this town. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG No FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG None at this time. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG There are none that come to mind than to provide affordable houses, as they pertain to the wages that everyone receives. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Not at this time. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG There needs to be many more housing types and lower cost options! Build higher and put housing options close to the commercial core to reduce transportation impacts. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG I don't know the answer. I've lived here for 20 years and still can't afford to own. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG No comment. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Nothing comes to mind. June 18, 2019 - Page 366 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 19 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Restating: Limit the AirB&B's that take away from full time residents being able to find or purchase housing. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG The current deed restricted properties are still too expensive for the regular Vail worker. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Nothing comes to mind. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG They need to have housing for residents with pets. Vail and Eagle County talk about how dog friendly we are yet there are only a few places that allow dogs and cats. Having a designated project or part of one dedicated to people with pets would help. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT RENT BIG Deed-restricted homes should be under 300,000. MALE 18-34 OTHER RENT BIG Make changes quickly. Progress quickly. The town is BEHIND the curve. Understanding that higher end residentials are important for a town like this, the town of Vail must understand the importance of having affordable housing for the workers of the town. There is no incentive to purchase a loft for .5 million dollars. MALE 18-34 OTHER RENT BIG Something has to be done to get rent reasonable again, the rent increases the last few years has hurt everyone except the SLUM Lords. MALE 35-44 OTHER RENT BIG No FEMALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG Vail Resorts should pay the largest share of housing costs as we are staffing their profits. Let their shareholders pay tax. June 18, 2019 - Page 367 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 20 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG First of all, the town of Vail should listen to the people who make this town work. The workers are the ones who make this town happen. Meaning, it is someone like myself. The town of Vail should pay focus to the workers at a chance to own a home or be deed-restricted. There is no way for me to buy a house here. They want me to go to Edwards to live and come to work here. They want anyone who works here to come here from Down Valley. Most of my co-workers cannot afford to live here. I live here for a reason. I want to live and work here. I don't want to commute for 30 minutes everyday. From what I can see, that is going on. The manager and Council people of Vail do not want the workers to live here. The same thing happens in Aspen and Steamboat, as well as any mountain towns in Colorado. The local population is being pushed out. If we don't have money, we have no say. They will listen to us, but do nothing about it. MALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG Let the free market work. It knows better than politicians do. MALE 45-54 OTHER RENT BIG What housing? $2000 a month for a room with a shared bathroom. MALE 55-64 OTHER RENT BIG No FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG Again, short term rentals for homeowners needs to be disallowed. Sites like Airbnb and VRBO ruin the housing market and also a lot of homeowners do not manage them well. There are plenty of hotels to stay at. Stop allowing households to be used as hotels, they are not meant for that. FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG More options for affordable rentals, PLEASE! Not everyone is looking to buy, and it seems that the deed-restrictions are only helping locals who are wanting to buy. We have to stop the inflation rates of rentals- it will eventually push away lower income residents who work at all of the restaurants and businesses in town. We have to limit the amount of housing being given out to second home owners or even rentals given out non locals. June 18, 2019 - Page 368 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 21 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG The only people that I know who could afford to buy Vails Deed restricted housing (Chamonix Community) are anesthesiologists. If your affordable housing is still that expensive then don't bother wasting your time. I'd love to see housing around the $200,000- 300,000 range. MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG I think taxing the people you are trying to help is weird logic. I agree the authority needs more funding but I disagree with this approach there are other ways of funding without hurting those that actually work in Vail. These two options seems very limited in imagination and creativity. MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG The 6 West apartments are way over priced and Vail Chamonix was built for Doctors and wealthy people to own in Vail. How many of those units went to someone who works for the town or has a blue collar job? MALE 18-34 REFUSED RENT BIG Why tax the locals more with general sales taxes? What other taxes are there that do not take more from the people currently trying to live here and save up for a property? Hotel stays? Airbnb tax rates? Taxing Vail Resorts more? Honestly after being in the valley for close to a decade it is my opinion that Vail Resorts does not actually give back nearly as much as they say they do to the community while continually making more and more money each year. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT BIG Regulate and tax AirBnB?s just like hotels and let the invisible hand of capitalism decide the winners and the losers. If I started a yoga studio in my living room for an hour a day I would need a zoning, business, building permit and Fire Marshall sign off right? Why are STR?s any different? June 18, 2019 - Page 369 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 22 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT BIG The town council fumbled the great opportunity it had with the east Vail project, there will be less of a percentage of local housing available because of that. Without more available affordable housing, there will not be a workforce to support the huge number of guests that visit Vail and expect the experience that was advertised. We are already feeling the strain to find good people that can afford to live/stay here and work. It will only get worse. I appreciate what the town has done so far, but there are huge leaps that still need to happen in the near future. Also, with such a large budget that Town of Vail has, surely there are funds that can be allocated to help more with the housing issue... FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED RENT BIG Pretty soon you will drive at the working class people. I am a nurse and I'm done living in an area where rents have doubled in the last three years. MALE 45-54 REFUSED RENT BIG Chamonix is too expensive for the employees that work most of the jobs in vail. If there were more deed restricted housing available, the prices would be lower and more affordable for the lower paid employees in the area. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED RENT BIG No FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED RENT BIG What is considered affordable housing here is a joke. Many owners of property are renting at higher rates that require several people to share an apartment or home to live here. Not all of us prefer to live as college students as we are all in different stages of our lives. Many adults prefer to live with just their families or on their own. MALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG Put your employees first vs the look of the town. At least have a 50/50 split. FEMALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG No, I don't have. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG There is nothing to add. June 18, 2019 - Page 370 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 23 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG NO TAX!! I'm not a home owner but, it should be the responsibility of the businesses to provide a cost of living adequate to the housing. Why should others take the brunt of the situation? VRBO and others are taking advantage of not providing the locals with housing. We need to put restrictions on VRBO properties because the community suffers as a whole. Once, every employee moves out of Vail then you will have lack of work force and loose money from the tourists coming in to enjoy their vacation. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG Vail resorts take advantage of our cit. Our City Council members aren't really equipped to deal or handle people who operate Vail resorts. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG They should restrict Airbnb. It makes rent more unaffordable for long- term locals. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG Not at this moment. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG It is great that they are trying to find housing, but they need to dig in their own pockets to fund it. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN RENT BIG This small effort put forth by Vail is being quickly eclipsed by need. I see no possible way that Vail can slow the problem. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Actual affordable housing. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I feel like you are trying to start some initiatives to help with this housing crisis. However, my concern is that it is not enough and is not coming fast enough. Every year we are losing more and more extremely qualified employees in the valley because they cannot afford to live and raise families here. Vail is losing the community we once had because the only people who can afford to 'live' here are 2nd and 3rd home owners. I feel you should substantially tax 2nd and 3rd homeowners and use that money to help with the housing crisis. Don't raise taxes for those who are already here and struggling to make it. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Increase property taxes on these huge houses that people are only in for 2 weeks out of the year. June 18, 2019 - Page 371 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 24 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG No comment. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG No FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG No FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Not at this time. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Taxes on the already poor working class of this valley to provide housing for the poor is ridiculous. This valley is made of money - find it somewhere other than the poor ass VR employees paychecks. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG The housing lottery is a great idea. However, $350,000 to $700,000 is not affordable for most people without a trust fund/ someone who had their college debt paid off. There needs to be assistance to young people who want to live and stay in the valley that are not trust funders. There also needs to be a better way to run the lottery without 20-100 applicants looking at the same home (there are also many people who rent out their lottery properties when it could go to someone who actually lives here year-round). FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG No, I don't really have anything. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG They need to consider more options for housing on assisting seasonal workers with homes than assisting long-term home buyers. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Based on the questions asked in this survey, I like this idea of a property tax increase and disagree with the idea of a sales tax. I'm glad to see the the Vail Town Council growing its commitment to action with the Vail Local Housing Authority. I feel like you are on the right track and want to see more. Middle Creek was a great idea, but was designed years ago and can't keep up with the current demand. Chamonix was also a great idea, but again can't keep up with current demand. 6 West Edwards is also on the right track, but due to accessibility (car, public transit, etc), there are more existing options and therefore less impact. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Get the rich non locals out of here. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I think both the Town Council and the Local Housing Authority are doing a great job in addressing the housing issues that the Town faces. June 18, 2019 - Page 372 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 25 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Put a cap on the amount of resort owned property, the resort owns most everything in town and it seems like the decisions are mostly made by the resort and the town follows suit. Town should take more ownership and demand the resort follow or close the resort to the public and have it only open for local residents. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG You're going to lose all employees, not just seasonal Vail employees, but your nurses, your teachers, your water and wastewater professionals, and your fire fighters. The people you need to make this valley work will no longer be here. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG No, I have none. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I encourage you to consider for purchase units on the East Vail plot, if that is able to go through. While we do need our seasonal workers, we also need young professionals/couples and young families who are looking to get their foot into the market door, so to speak. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I feel it's too little too late for this problem to be addressed. The issue of housing had been brought up to town council, Vail housing authority and anyone who would listen by many locals for an extraordinary amount of time. The lions ridge project went from promising to disaster. The Chamonix project went from promising to disaster. It feels that the Town of Vail is more worried about its brass statues than the element Vail 'Vail', which is the people and the experiences it provides to its visitors. Not asking the world from the Town of Vail, but with a little help our family and many others like it will be forced, begrudgingly, to leave. The cost to commute to work in Vail versus closer communities is negligible. My family and I have been Vail residents for 8 yrs and have loved in Eagle county for 13. We would prefer to stay, but are running out of options. June 18, 2019 - Page 373 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 26 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I realize that Town of Vail is finally making efforts, but it needs to be so much more and much faster! This town is dying without the ability to provide affordable housing for its community members and bending over backwards to accommodate people that do not live here full-time year round. There seems to be a lack of accountability and little to no motivation to support younger people trying to ?make-it? in this town. It is OBVIOUS that the old people that helped to build this town are laughing all the way to the bank and want to see NO positive Changes for the future. They have made theirs and are unwilling to see the need to support new and younger people/families willing to work and build a great community for generations to come. don't let Denver Epic passers take over this town! it's already happening now- plus Vail Resorts customer service is in the dump- I would seriously consider moving to Aspen or Steamboat if things don't start to change in the next few years. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It's nice that the authorities are addressing the problem. When I moved here over ten years ago nothing was being done. Guess thats why the last few years have been rough. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG There are none. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Appreciate any effort but the Vail area is so out of touch with the workers I dont see anything being fixed. Ban short term rentals county wide and stop building luxury everywhere. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Build something people can afford to buy. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Chamonix housing is insane...why are there 3/4 of a million dollar homes? Any one that can afford that doesn't need help. Also crap built stack a shacks with no parking at the ass end of the valley (6West) How is that part of Vail? I'm a native of Steamboat Springs, combat veteran of 10th Mountain Division. I perform an essential function for the community that is skilled and difficult to fill. I have 800 plus credit score a hundred grand saved up, and make 90k a year and can't find a place to live that I can afford...screw this place. June 18, 2019 - Page 374 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 27 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG No comment. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Not at this time. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Oh yeah, great... raise taxes... what kind of cacamaymi idea is that that will help working class folks get affordable housing... They will be paying more taxes... That does not help. It is a scam. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Biggest complaint already shared about Chamonix Vail. This housing isn't affordable to most employees in Vail, those of us who keep the town running in retail, hospitality and food and beverage. A great opportunity for true affordable housing accessible to the "working class" was thrown away and ignored when the decisions were made for Chamonix Vail. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I believe the lottery system should go back to the tiered qualifications selection. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Thank you for working hard to solve this problem! We need it! FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG They should keep exploring new property opportunities to expand the county and Vail. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG To be perfectly honest, can you give me a phone number where I can talk with someone local instead of talking with you? You don't live here, and I would really rather talk with my local town's council member rather than someone in Utah. You are calling from Utah. I will absolutely give someone a shit ton of information, especially since you wasted 30 minutes of my time. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Affordable housing does not start at ~$490k. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Continue. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG I have heard there is a penalty that may be trivial compared to gains in selling the Chamonix houses. If true how can we prevent this in the future. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG No June 18, 2019 - Page 375 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 28 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG The Chamonix development and Vail InDEED program have been instrumental in bringing relatively affluent workers back into Vail. However, for the typical Vail worker, those properties are out of reach and un-affordable. In my opinion, the Town must build truly affordable housing units available for purchase? Those suitable for workers earning between 45-60k (and not the median, 80k and above). Think understated quality?like the Red Sandstone development with one stall garages. These are timeless units that will look great generations from now, but they must be priced not for the affluent, but for the typical hard working Vail employee. Respectfully, it's imperative these are affordably priced between the 190's to low 300's. This will go a long way in giving back to typical Vail employees who greatly contribute to the continued success of the Town and resort. Vail is a wildly successful, world class ski town. it's important we all share- in-on this success to sustain a diverse and inclusive resort community by providing realistically and affordably priced homes for the typical worker to purchase. Sites to consider: East Vail parcel as there is plenty of room, Middle Creek (immediately west of), and the old Roost Motel location. For rentals, consider additional units in back of Buzzard?s Park and/or developing on the RV site west of Dobson. In closing, the availability of affordable housing in Vail and down valley is truly at crisis levels. Valuable employees are getting priced out and have nowhere to go. I believe the Town and/or resort can do more to mitigate the problem. Thank you for taking the time to listen to my concerns. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Thanks for your work in this matter. More affordable housing the better. June 18, 2019 - Page 376 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 29 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG It is to charge for deed-restricted property, such as those in Chamonix. It is almost $800,000, which is just short of $1,000,000. It is freaking ridiculous. Doctors are living in those properties. There are no mechanics, food distribution employees, no teachers, and no housekeepers. These are the people who maintain Vail. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Prices are out of control, just like everywhere. Possibly, we can put a cap on how much they can raise our rent. MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED RENT BIG Something needs to be done. We are losing valuable employees as a result of lack of affordable housing both as rentals and purchases. it needs to be done at much faster pace than is currently be implemented. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT AT ALL Please STOP!!! Go to Eagle or Gypsum and build whatever you like. There is no more room here. I'm still awaiting the disaster that was Roost Lodge. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT AT ALL No FEMALE 65+OTHER OWN NOT AT ALL The ability to create community through housing had passed or over. MALE 35-44 REFUSED OWN NOT AT ALL Lots of people work at Saks 5th Avenue in New York. Those people don't live on 5th Avenue in New York! The point is: Vail is a special place and real estate is expensive as a consequence. Employees don't need to live in Vail to work in Vail. If people want to live in Vail, they are free to do so. If you come here straight out of high school or college and have no money, prepare to pay the cost. If you worked and saved money to live in Vail, it is certainly possible. Town of Vail shouldn't determine who can and can't live here. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL Chamonix is a total joke. You realize that THREE of our anesthesiologists live there. Last year they made $650,000 each. I know this because they are my partners. Stop with this affordable housing bullshit, listen to people who live here. MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL Having a lifty as my neighbor will not increase my sense of community. It will only make me want to move to Beaver Creek. June 18, 2019 - Page 377 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 30 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 35-44 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL The Town of Vail and Vail Local Housing Authority are negatively distorting the housing market. They act exactly like the corrupt USSR whereby party favoured individuals get access to state subsidised housing whilst everyone does not. You should be ashamed that at least three doctors making greater than $600,000 a year receive a Town of Vail subsidy to live in Chamonix. If you cannot afford to live in Vail, then live down valley. Living in Vail is a privilege and not a right. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL The problem is not shortage of housing, it's too many people in a small valley. Stop encouraging growth! All the highly desirable towns become more expensive as more people move there. If people can't afford to live in Vail they can go downvalley or elsewhere. don't tax me to make it artificially affordable for others. Most Vail residents would prefer less people here. Only the business owners want more people here and they are the ones most influencing the town council. Let them deal with housing their employees. Get rid of the Epic pass and many of the short term rentals will return to long term rentals providing more housing. Also the Vail experience will be greatly improved for destination tourists and locals. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL There are better solutions than what are being proposed by both the city and authority. To use the term residents to those who are for there for temporary need is making the poll very misleading. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT AT ALL Housing is a valley wide problem. We need to be 2 towns. Eagle and Gypsum become Egypt and Vail to Wolcott becomes Edvonavailturn. GET A CLUE. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL Again, the Town should not be in the Public Housing business, and I do not want my taxes going towards this purpose. I could write an essay on this subject, but this is the basic conclusion. I will be voting. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL Why is it that the only solution is to always raise taxes and expand the role of government. How about less taxes, and better efficiency of government. June 18, 2019 - Page 378 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 31 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT AT ALL Residents should not pay to support housing for employees of local businesses who underpay their employees and avoid creating opportunities to house their employees; higher wages create sustainable jobs that would keep employees part of the community, and who may in turn decide to contribute to the community instead of expecting constant assistance. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT NOT AT ALL Need to get rid of some myopic LHA members such as Steve and get new blood on the board. Quit wasting money and time in unimpactful efforts. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH We have a great wealth disparity in Vail. It is second home to the ultra rich. In my opinion many of the full time residence have an income that is a small fraction to that of the second home owners. A few ideas would be to start by only taxing non full time owner properties, and property valued at $1.75 million and up. MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH The town needs to spend more money and build more housing projects. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH No MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH The idea of commuting 1/2 hour or more to work is a pretty common occurrence throughout America. How much money did the Town of Vail pay for each deed restriction that is available on the free market for Johannes Fessler's project. Not the number of deed restrictions divided by what the town paid, rather the number of restrictions on the free market divided by what the town paid? If the current Town council feels this is important, fund it out of the General Fund. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH We are a resort town. Success depends on maintaining the character of our quant community. At current course and speed we will be just another Frisco in ten years. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH The Town of Vail should figure out a way to keep the east Vail parcel only for big horn sheep--no development there. June 18, 2019 - Page 379 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 32 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH It's not the cost, as I usually support most tax requests. It's the Town of Vail pushing totally inappropriate projects like sacrificing our wildlife for a monster 5 story building in E Vail to house hundreds for the benefit of private business. This was the turning point for a lot of us. The town council must not be an extension of the Chamber of Commerce MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH No MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH Stay out of the housing market. If employers can't find housing for their employees, they will have to pay living wages to attract the necessary staff, which will significantly benefit the existing residents that have found housing. All you are doing is wasting more tax dollars and shifting tax revenue to benefit Vail Resorts and the other major employers in Vail. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN NOT TOO MUCH No, there are none. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Local businesses should pay higher wages so that workers can afford to live in Vail. MALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Not at this time. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH When we reach full capacity we are maxed out. If people can't afford to live here then they can't afford to live here. We should not be subsiding housing. June 18, 2019 - Page 380 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 33 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH From my responses you should realize I feel the Town of Vail is placing too much importance and dollars towards this even if supported by others taxes placed on residents, homeowners and guests. Get private enterprises to be more creative and place ?employee? appropriate housing in locals throughout the county. Stop encroachment of Vail neighborhoods and changing the character Vail is and has been known for. Your actions are increasing homes to be Second home use by restricting rentals and Vail is becoming less of a community and more of a business. Skiing numbers are declining and the lack of concern by Vail government towards the needs of those currently living here is very discouraging. Too much emphasis is on the workers at the expense of residents. These actions are affecting many aspects of day to day life and changing the character of Vail by more density, bigger taller buildings, affecting view corridors and loosing the importance of protecting Nature and Wildlife. You choose to rely on advise from paid developers and advisers but do not truly listen to residents or concerned naturalists who have personal experiences they relate as to how detrimental these actions are impacting our community. Vail is becoming detached from its roots and turning it into an overdeveloped town and no longer unique or quaint. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH If you make the deed restrictions for the Vail employees and not limit the amount of equity, the market will control itself. The more projects you approve without the corporations being responsible to provide their employees with housing the bigger the problem grows. You can build as much as you want and the population will keep growing if that is what you want for our small valley. June 18, 2019 - Page 381 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 34 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH They should get out of the real estate business. The Vail Local Housing Authority should not even exist. We shouldn't be paying for that, the taxpayers. If they want to create more revenue, they need to incorporate Highland with this and all of West Vail. It is considered currently a legal county within the legal county limits to some extent. In other words, they are all of the properties that exist from that junction heading east to East Vail to be included in their taxing. If that would occur, then we wouldn't be having this discussion about having money to help further deploy housing or help further any more investigation into this housing. Furthermore, it should not solely depend on the town of Vail. The town of Vail and their housing authority should not even exist. What should exist is the Eagle County flat-out Housing Authority. It should be Eagle County being taxed. It shouldn't strictly be the town of Vail. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH "Commuity" in Vail is gone. Long gone. You are chasing a cow that is already out of the barn. If you cared about community and neighborhood cohesiveness you would not have taken the stance you've taken on Airbnb. You are being disingenuous. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Disclose long term costs of maintaining the InDeed program even after building out the deed restrictions and other alternative housing initiatives. Develop an exit strategy for removing deed restrictions. The limited natural space for development within the Valley must be respected and understanding the lack of decent paying year round jobs job opportunities must be factors into the need for the historical seasonal housing needs. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Cancel all funding for the housing authority and their housing programs. MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Get out of the housing business. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH If you don't like it move. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH Raising taxes on current homeowners makes our housing. . . Less Affordable!! June 18, 2019 - Page 382 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 35 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH As I said, I am opposed to having governments involved in housing for working people. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH I have nothing at this time. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN NOT TOO MUCH I would very much like to see more dormitory-style housing with bus transportation to the town. MALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Stop wasting tax payer money trying to recapture the community that existed in the 1960s. Vail is no longer a quaint hamlet pioneered by visionary veterans. Those days are long gone. it's an international resort town destination with a healthy and understandably elevated housing market as a result. I think it's great that people choose to live the mountain lifestyle. But generally they are taking lower paying jobs to do it. That's the sacrifice. It shouldn't be rewarded by subsidized housing on the backs of everyone else. Just stop it. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH InDEED program should receive all the funding. Most effective way to secure employee housing in the Town of Vail. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Raising taxes for affordable housing ends in raising taxes for nearly any purpose people want to finance. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Think the Housing Authority has done a great job with the Chamonix and other properties.....just don't think we need anymore in Town of Vail FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH You need to spend more time with the business community and the Eagle County Commissioners. It is NOT my responsibility to fund housing for businesses or Employees in Eagle County. The extent that I support my tax dollars used for housing are for units for town employees only. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Please stop infilling the open space we have to keep the highway ans street appeal not congested with solid buildings Example East Vail. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Provide incentives that make it possible for private business to build their own housing. Not everyone needs a house, build apartments. June 18, 2019 - Page 383 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 36 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Stop the tax and spend mentality. You never have enough! My bills have increased every year and yet, do I get new services like free winter parking for homeowners? NO! I get squat EVERY YEAR! FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH Land in Town of Vail is 'beach front'. Employees should not expect to live beach front. Increased Mid valley housing with adequate transit up and down the valley is a reasonable solution. Town of Vail will have to participate financially and Eagle County will have to increase density and height restrictions to make this feasible. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH The Town of Vail had missed the boat years ago on the community, that is why most people moved down valley. The Town of Vail did not help me purchase my property and I do not agree with them being involved in real estate. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH I understand people wanting their mountain lifestyle subsidized. But I don't consider that to be a mature or responsible way to live. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN NOT TOO MUCH The word is out. There is a shortage of affordable housing in Eagle County. The result, homes are being built. Many more planned. Let the marketplace solve the issue. Not everyone can live in Vail city limits. Provide subsidized transportation and cheap parking within the town for employees. More cost effective than getting into the real estate business. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED REFUSED NOT TOO MUCH I have shared my concerns with an emphasis being placed on housing within the Town of Vail. I feel that both the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority would be wise to look at down valley housing options and potentially consider added transportation to/from these locations. FEMALE 35-44 REFUSED RENT NOT TOO MUCH Not at this time. June 18, 2019 - Page 384 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 37 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN REFUSED Please read my other comments regarding a living wage by Vail employers, number of people in rental properties, unrelated tenants numbers no more than 2, notices to properties within 250 feet and Associations of conversion of a property to EHU, lowering value of nearby properties. Redo Town of Vail ordinance on numbers in rentals, add restrictions limiting number of unrelated renters. I'll pay more property tax and more sales tax if you do that. FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN REFUSED Yes MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED I'm happy to see that this issue is being addressed. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT REFUSED The market allows it. It means that the cost should be what the market allows. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT I can't think of anything. FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT On two occasions I have lived next door to a Town of Vail employee housing unit over the past 10 years. I noticed that they go vacant for long periods of time. This seems contradictory and like a waste. These properties should be managed better or rented out to eagle county residents in need. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Keep housing aesthetically pleasing. FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Restrict short term rentals that take away from employee housing pool. don't build in East Vail, there has to be a better solution. MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT None June 18, 2019 - Page 385 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 38 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT The town still has not effective described why they are doing this. Increase the number of deed restrictions - Why? Increase community - why? They need to be clear about who will benefit from this program. My neighbor bought their property through the deed restriction program and I am glad to have them. However, I am less supportive of supporting Vail Health underpaying the support staff in their "not for profit" hospital while that rack up increasing amounts of capital and spend it on useless programs and perks for the doctors and executives. The Valley's continued death by a thousand tax cuts program is rediculous. If you want to raise money for this, put a specific tax on lodging to fund it. If Denver can put a 5% stadium tax on hotels, you can put a 10% housing tax on all lodging. Due what Teluride does and add it to the restarant bill. But for those of us that live here full time, stop putting this on us. You are taking us out of the valley, which is what you say you are trying to counteract. If you want to fund this, put it on the people who are taking housing stock out of the market, not on those of us working out asses off trying to make it in Vail. FEMALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Not at the moment. MALE 55-64 DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT No, I have none. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT I would like to know the data behind the statement that long term renting has decreased because of AirB&B short term rentals. How many people would prefer spotty rental income for long term, stable rents? FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT No FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT Recent projects seem very dense with little yard space for families. FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT The town holds too many meetings/discussions that residents are unaware of about projects. Too many decisions are made without neighborhoods input. Members on the council do not represent constituents, but instead make decisions based upon their personal points of view. June 18, 2019 - Page 386 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 39 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT It needs to focus on sustainability and not on housing. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT We are encroaching too much on available "open space" areas the Town of Vail. we must balance employee housing growth while maintaining open areas of especially in East Vail! NO to the employee housing and further development on the East Vail parcel now under consideration. Preservation of the Big Horn herd is priority #1 . MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT I appreciate the Vail Town Council and Vail Local Housing Authority for soliciting my opinion. MALE 65+DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT There have been a lot of discussions and we have been to council meetings about this. There is one particular possibility of this. The developer is Triumph, and I am opposed to that. The location of the Triumph Project is in a bad area. I am for the idea, but I am against the location. FEMALE REFUSED DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT I think the first thought is to acquire land before checking other possibilities for problem-solving. FEMALE REFUSED DEMOCRAT OWN SOMEWHAT No FEMALE 35-44 OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT No comment. MALE 55-64 OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT A 4% transfer tax would hurt our real estate market. FEMALE 65+OTHER OWN SOMEWHAT No, there is nothing. MALE 18-34 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT No comment. FEMALE 45-54 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT You have members on Vail housing authority who don't even live in Vail and may be gone from the community in a few years. I won't be gone and I am arguably much more vested in the success of my community than some of your representatives. FEMALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT There is nothing I can think of right now. June 18, 2019 - Page 387 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 40 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT There is no doubt that the need for employee housing is very acute. However, this need should not be an excuse to bludgeon our planning rules into oblivion on greenfield sites and thereby destroy some of the things that make Vail attractive. Two projects need more careful evaluation: the east Vail site needs to consider the impacts of excessive development on the only sheep herd left in the upper valley. ?Bighorn Road? will soon be the epitaph for that herd if the proposed development continues as currently proposed. And that six story, 600 foot long west Vail monster proposed to sit 20? off the Frontage Road, approved in the name of employee housing, should get a more critical review when the new buyers come back for approvals. Incredibly dense development was approved for the Evervail sites. Why can't VR and the Town of Vail look there for higher density housing? FEMALE 65+REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT The big employers - the hospital and Vail Resorts should take the responsibility - not the town, not the property owners. Keep Government out. MALE 65+REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Get VR and Vail Health--I assume the 2 largest employers in Vail, and who are doing extremely well financially--to step up and do more for housing their employees. The Town of Vail seems to be much more focused on solving the problem simply by putting it on the taxpayers. Ever Vail is a perfect example of where workforce housing could go-- VR's supposed effort on the East Vail parcel is almost laughable-if it wasn't so self-serving. FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Please try to preserve some of the beauty of the valley that has drawn people to this area, and not build on every square inch of space FEMALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Preserve the parcel of land that supports the herd of Bighorn Sheep that has survived there long before the Town of Vail. Do not endanger our fast dwindling wildlife by placing employee housing on any such site. June 18, 2019 - Page 388 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 41 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE REFUSED REFUSED OWN SOMEWHAT Will the town divert the collected taxes to workforce housing. Subsidizing V/R, the hospital and The Mt School? What taxes do deed restricted houses pay? FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I don't think increasing property taxes is the way to go- this seems unfair to people who are already residents. I think the slight sales tax increase is more palatable as this would be spread amongst more people. FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Why not take the tax on groceries and redistribute? FEMALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT There is nothing. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Again I truly believe that there is a pool of property managers that own two and three properties or more in the Vail Valley. This group of people could coordinate with businesses and Human Resources throughout the valley to fill rooms and always have renters. I currently work with the Ritz-Carlton and have for managers that I'm working with. MALE 45-54 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Focus on the problem which has been created by the growth of the short term rental industry, the housing stock exists, its just being used for the wrong use. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I am pleased with the direction and leadership. June 18, 2019 - Page 389 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 42 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT In my neighborhood I reported numerous times over the course of several years a property which the renter, will allow visitors to put a sleeping bag on the floor for $25/night. The building should be condemned it is so substandard, but no action Is ever taken. During the Burton Games there were 25-30 kids staying in a 3 bedroom unit. Other neighbors complained as well but nothing was done. I want safe housing for workers in Town of Vail, but think that Vail Resorts should take the lead to provide housing for more of their employees. If Town of Vail want housing for it's employees and wants taxpayers and tourists to pay for it, than it should manage the development themselves, not assist in a project with a huge profit for the developer. Also, cheap and ugly housing (such as what is under construction next to Red Sandstone Elementary) should not be allowed to be duplicated at Katsos Ranch. DRB is so strict with residential design guidelines but "for profit" commercial developers are allowed to build nondescript "big box" apartment complexes, that run out of $$ for landscaping etc at the end of a project. FEMALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT No MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I would suggest the Town of Vail look for low impact areas to consider work force housing for example, explore the idea of having VR do a land swap for public land by the public works area for public land there. You could also preserve the big horn sheep land to protect wildlife. MALE 55-64 REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT No FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I am opposed to the Town's decision to allow a large affordable housing complex to be built on the land in east Vail. This project will be a huge negative impact on the bighorn sheep herd and it just is not the right use for that parcel of land. FEMALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I have none. June 18, 2019 - Page 390 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 43 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT Between deed restricting and FRBO availability within free market rental pool has dropped, driving up rents. I am a landlord not a tenant. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I understand the issue and the Town of Vail's position on acquiring more housing for workers. The goal of 1000 units is over zealous and needs to tempered to a realistic value that is attainable without increased taxes. The private sector is also culpable in the housing issue. They should be brought to bear the responsibility as well. Not just the tax paying residents of the Town of Vail. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT No MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT No tax increases. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT We are all lucky to live in Eagle County. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT We have a very finite amount of land that can be developed, open space needs to stay open space. FEMALE REFUSED REPUBLICAN OWN SOMEWHAT I appreciate the need for housing. It is a Vail Resorts and Eagle county issue and not solely a Town of Vail issue. Let's all row in the same direction. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT The Short Term Rental market in Vail MUST be regulated for purposes of the "Vail Brand" in quality of hospitality, making sure that they are up to regulation in not being a nuisance to neighbors or causing parking issues. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I appreciate the effort in providing affordable housing to the Vail community. I believe that while the efforts have been good and the mission makes sense, there are still areas of support that I will emphasize again can help buyers get themselves into the free market because once they are able to get their foot into the door, they can thrive and be able to contribute to that market, rather than be restricted. June 18, 2019 - Page 391 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 44 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Design and Review Board should allow designs that reflect the prestige of this resort community and that complement the high home values that already exist. Careful placement of new housing so that it does not bring down or impact current homeowners in a negative way. Surrounding residents should have input. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I understand the need, but it shouldn't burden other residents. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Town of Vail doing a great job - Vail Resorts needs to step up. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT You're doing great. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT There is nothing at the moment. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I feel strongly that we need more seasonal rentals for those employees who move here for the winter season. I do not believe we need to build or develop more open space for this purpose but instead use what we have. Timber Ridge still needs to be redeveloped. Perhaps more units can be added. If the Lionshead structure, Dobson ice rink are redeveloped, then a seasonal employee housing could also be added for the employees that come to work on the mountain and in the village businesses. There are very good examples of this in France where they provide housing for their on mountain staff that is very near to the mountain. A very simple design, bunker style. If we make it easy for them, we will attract better employees and that is who has face to face contact with our destination guests. I am for re- development of current properties and deed restrictions. I am not for developing or building in the little open spaces left in Vail. Thank you for the survey. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I really think that residing outside the town and using local transportation is the most viable option for those (most normal people) who cannot afford the astronomical Vail prices. This is what everyone else does who works in an expensive enclave. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No comment. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No comment. June 18, 2019 - Page 392 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 45 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT The housing issue will always be an issue, it's been around since the Town was created. I think the Town really needs to take a hard, long look at the issue. And what they are creating in town, building, developing, etc. I think people are having fatigue with all the ?new? stack a shack projects. Vail is losing its identity to the whole county becoming filled with affordable / deed restricted projects. Gone are the days of a ski town feeling like a ski town. And families staying and growing families in Town. Maybe the Town could create some type of homeownership loan program for down payments to help people / families secure loans and get into existing housing, instead of everyone living in a stack a shack community, The Town should start spending time creating some type of register / guidelines preserving buildings with any type of historical or architectural significance to Vail. They would be better served building on the great Town that has been established and putting people in existing homes as opposed to developing every last morsel of land with stack a shack! There are plenty of those around since the 70?s, that can still be occupied! From what I can see, the problem is never going to go away. Therefore, creative thinking will win on this one. Since it still seems to be a problem, doesn?t seem one or two more stack a shack projects are going to solve much. More of a detriment to the Town than a positive! FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Too many layers of government. Maybe this should be an Eagle County Authority, not solely Vail. FEMALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Nope, I have none. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Invest in transit!!! MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Nothing additional. MALE 45-54 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT To be realistic, we need to continue to expand beyond Vail's boundaries for more leasing options again focusing on those employed in Vail. June 18, 2019 - Page 393 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 46 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Bring Vail Health and Vail Resorts to the table BEFORE asking residents to subsidize their corporations needs. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Is establishing additional workforce housing in the expensive and limited Town limits the smartest way to attain the goal? Building more workforce housing in less expensive areas and improving public transportation to support the needs of workers seems to be better use of the money. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Need to address the rental problem not just the residential ownership problem developing in the county. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Town of Vail goal to house 30% of employees within its boundaries is totally unrealistic. Hospital and resort are valley wide amenities and not just a Town of Vail problem. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Correct the zoning in west Vail north. Incentives for developing the west Vail mall area to add housing. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I am offended by ads which say current residents should help pay for housing for new residents so the new residents don't have to share couches, live in cars, etc like some use to do. The town and Vail Resorts can help new residents by providing livable affordable housing for potential new residents. The Chamonix property, Edwards property and others are not affordable for most local residents working for the town, Vail Resorts or most local businesses. Chamonix had several properties the were priced in the millions. Rumor is the new Solar Vail is going to have "efficiency apartments" for $1300 per month. Both the town and the hotel make a profit on employee housing! That's wrong! MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT If the tax goes into Triumph devs pocket, no support. Hire a builder, not a profit center for developers! Town of Vail can provide a lower rent if you choose. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No comment. MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No June 18, 2019 - Page 394 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 47 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No MALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I'm really happy with what they have done, but they need transportation. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Businesses are also responsible for securing housing for their employees, like VR, Sonnenalp, Sebastian, etc., already do. The town might consider developing a larger employee housing project where the units are pre-sold at cost to local Vail businesses. It is not up to the town to provide housing because that amounts to subsidizing private businesses. Local businesses must also contribute to solving the housing issues. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I think the Town needs to work hard with developers to provide housing options (what is happening with The Roost property?), but not be a landlord. I don't know the details of deed restrictions, but wonder what happens if an employee retires. I agree that there is a shortage of affordable housing in the valley, but I don't read about the various towns and the county addressing the problem together. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Please DO NOT build affordable housing on the frontage road in East Vail, east of the Mountain School. I would be more willing to support affordable housing if I knew more about the design and location. I think developers should also bear the cost of providing affordable housing attached to their spec homes or should make a "payment in lieu" to the town. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I would like them to consider imposing taxes on the people who are letting other people use their places as hotel rooms instead of increasing the property or sales taxes. FEMALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT They should acquire or build housing for town of Vail employees similar to what ERWSD has done. We need to collaborate with the county members and build apartments. June 18, 2019 - Page 395 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 48 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT As written earlier, I believe that housing in Vail should only be subsidized by government for people who MUST be able to come to work in Vail if I-70 is closed. All other subsidized housing should be down valley, simply because it's much cheaper to build there. A county wide housing authority, or something similar, must be developed. Transportation is an obvious issue, but addressing it should be a part of the task of the housing authority. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Local property owners should not pay via taxes or otherwise for the mis-management by town of Vail councils over the years. Your predecessors blew it long ago. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT Look at the 46 acre parcel at the end of Willow Way. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT No MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT See previous comments about using tax monies to subsidize homes for people of means that could otherwise purchase homes outright. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT The current employee housing frenzy has completely overlooked the residents that has made a committment to like in Vail. Examples of this are a approval and near approval of th edevelopment of the Roost property and th eredevelopment of 2000 and 2004 Chamonix Lane. The prevalance of short term housing ( with no quantity restrictions) is also ruining our neighborhoods. MALE 65+UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT When there is a piece of land within the town of Vail that can be developed for employee housing, the allowable density should be increased on those sites to accommodate more housing. I believe the East ail site on the north side of frontage road should be allowed more density. FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I am not in favor of an additional property tax for full time residents, nor should it be on the fall ballot. June 18, 2019 - Page 396 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 49 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE REFUSED UNAFFILIATED OWN SOMEWHAT I just think that we cannot and should not try to solve all the housing issues. These problems exist in ever beautiful place that draws people to want to live there. Vail will become a place that isn't desirable if we grow too large!! MALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT REFUSED SOMEWHAT Deed restricted housing is not attractive to a lot of the people I know who work in the valley. It effectively limits the amount of return on investment we can make in the teal estate portion of our investment portfolios and the deed restricted options aren't as attractive in comparison to counterparts that are a farther drive from town. I'd highly recommend taking a harder look at similar communities in Northern California and Washington state that face housing issues and adopting some measures that employers/municipalities have successfully used. Subsidizing housing is a solution that I believe would have great success with not much more of a financial impact.. this is just a hastily put together example and I'd have to see what the costs associated with retaining a single employee are now to make it relative.. but with say 500k a year you could attract, subsidize, and potentially retain 25 employees. Each gets a 20k a year housing subsidy to live and own in the town of Vail. The subsidy lasts 5 years which effectively subsides 100k of mortgage each and allows them to buy at market price, become an equity stakeholder in their property and the town and incentivizes them to put down roots. Not sure what your current budget is but with a 2 million dollar revolving budget this project could effectively attract 100 buyers a year and after five years add 25 every new year.. MALE 45-54 REFUSED REFUSED SOMEWHAT No MALE REFUSED REFUSED REFUSED SOMEWHAT It would be nice if the Town Council genuinely had their employees best interests at heart. FEMALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT No. MALE 18-34 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT No FEMALE 35-44 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT I have nothing extra to say. June 18, 2019 - Page 397 of 404 "Are there any thoughts, suggestions or opinions that are positive or negative regarding housing for residents that you would like to share with the Vail Town Council and the Vail Local Housing Authority? " Vail Local Housing Authority Community Survey 5/22/19 - 6/5/19 400n, +/- 4.61% MoE Magellan Strategies 1685 Boxelder St. Ste 300 | Louisville, CO 80027 www.Magellanstrategies.com | 303-861-8585 50 GENDER AGE RANGE PARTY HOME HOUSING - PROBLEM VERBATIM RESPONSE FEMALE 45-54 DEMOCRAT RENT SOMEWHAT If Town of Vail purchased and managed and RENTED their own units it could produce rather than drain revenue. FEMALE 18-34 REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT Focus on solutions for singles rather than only caring about families. You can fit a lot more one bedroom units into a space than you can fit 3 bedroom units. We have a need for quantity of housing units and there are already plenty of housing units in Vail for families while the singles are made to feel unwelcome. Good luck operating the town when you only have employees with children. MALE 65+REPUBLICAN RENT SOMEWHAT They are really trying to make an effort and are headed in the right direction. FEMALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT Make the "affordable" housing actually affordable. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT A coworker used the indeed program to get $150,000 off of the price tag on his $900,000 condo. How that helps alleviate the housing concerns of the folks running the resort and living in a 2-bedroom place with 6 other people is beyond me. MALE 18-34 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT Employees deserve affordable housing within the Towns limits in order to sustain a community. Plans to sustain a local population need to be implemented, instead of forcing those with low income West of Eagle County, and forcing them to commute. Pay is not sustainable enough for somebody to pay rent, eat, and commute. FEMALE 35-44 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT I do not have at this time. FEMALE 55-64 UNAFFILIATED RENT SOMEWHAT The Vail Housing Authority needs to be more transparent in its processes. June 18, 2019 - Page 398 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: Resolution No. 28, S eries of 2019 a Resolution A uthorizing the P urchase of Homestake Unit B 212, 1081 Vail View Drive, Vail, Colorado. P RE S E NT E R(S ): George Ruther, Housing Director AC T IO N RE Q UE S T E D O F C O UNC I L: A pproved, Approve with Modifications, or Deny Resolution No. 28, Series of 2019 B AC K G RO UND: The availability of housing for its employees remains an ongoing need for the Town of Vail municipal government. As the third largest employer in Vail, the Town of Vail too is challenged by the need f or housing f or its workf orce. Over the years the Town has taken a wide range of approaches to addressing its employee housing needs, including “buying down” homes for purchase by Town of Vail employees. S TAF F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: T he Vail Town staff recommends the Vail Town Council approves Resolution No. 28, Series of 2019, as presented. AT TAC H ME N TS: Description Resolution No 28 Series of 2019 Homestake at Vail Purchase memorandum 06182019 Resolution No. 28, Series of 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 399 of 404 To: Vail Town Council From: George Ruther, Housing Director Date: June 18, 2019 Subject: Resolution No. 28, Series of 2019 a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Homestake at Vail, Unit B-212, 1081 Vail View Drive, Vail, Colorado 1. SUMMARY The purpose of this resolution is to authorize the purchase of Homestake at Vail, Unit B-212. 2. BACKGROUND The availability of housing for its employees remains an ongoing need for the Town of Vail municipal government. As the third largest employer in Vail, the Town of Vail too is challenged by the need for housing for its workforce. Over the years the Town has taken a wide range of approaches to addressing its employee housing needs, including “buying down” homes for purchase by Town of Vail employees. The Homestake at Vail home is a great starter-type home for a Town of Vail employee interested in home ownership in Vail. The home is a +/- 580 square foot, one bedroom/one bathroom, end unit with easy access to recreation and to free Town of Vail public transit. The home includes surface parking for two vehicles. Monthly association dues are currently $368 and include gas heat, water, waste disposal and recycling, snow removal, common area maintenance, and common area insurance. The home is offered for sale at $359,000. A similar home in the Homestake at Vail development recently closed for more than $360,000. The Homestake at Vail is an older property in Vail. Town of Vail files indicate the property was developed in the mid-1970’s. It is currently in original condition, yet very good condition, with only a few minor updates completed over the years. An initial inspection of the property has been completed. No significant issues were identified during the inspection. There is need, however, to update the interior fixtures and appliances and replace the seal damaged south facing windows. An initial estimate of the window repairs is approximately $6,500 with interior updates totaling an additional +/- $10,000. The property is being offered for sale “as is”. June 18, 2019 - Page 400 of 404 3. RECOMMENDATIONS A proposal for purchase has been prepared with participation and collaboration with several Town of Vail Departments, including administration, finance, public works, human resources and housing. The proposal for purchase recommends the following: 1) Execute a purchase contract subject to an appraisal, inspection, and other due diligence provisions 2) Acquire the property subject to an assignable contract 3) Repair the seal damaged windows prior to resale ensuring a transferrable warranty 4) Record a primary residence deed-restriction and a Town of Vail first option of purchase on the home. 5) Place a maximum resale price appreciation cap of 3% per annum on the home through the deed-restriction 6) “Buy down” the value of the home and offer it for sale to a Town of Vail employee 7) Offer the home for-sale to a Town of Vail employee, subject to the deed-restriction and a first option to purchase. This approach mirrors the Red Sandstone Townhomes model. 8) Funding for the initial purchase and subsequent “buy down” would likely come from the Town’s capital fund (TBD) 4. NEXT STEPS If authorized, the Town staff will proceed forward with the next steps outlined in the contract for purchase of the residential property. Closing and possession is presently set for July 2, 2019. 5. ACTION REQUESTED Does the Vail Town Council authorize the Town Manager to execute the contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate to facilitate the Town’s purchase of Unit B-212, Homestake at Vail Condominium, 1081, Vail View Drive, Vail, Colorado, consistent with the recommendation outlined herein? Town of Vail Page 2 June 18, 2019 - Page 401 of 404 RESOLUTION NO. 28 SERIES OF 2019 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS HOMESTAKE at VAIL, UNIT B212, 1081 VAIL VIEW DRIVE, VAIL, COLORADO 81657 WHEREAS, Judith Ann Dyer (“Seller”) owns the real property more particularly described and depicted in the Contract to Buy and Sell Estate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to purchase the Property subject to the terms of the Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate (the “Contract”); NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado: Section 1. The Town Council hereby approves the Contract and authorizes the Town Manager to execute the Contract on behalf of the Town in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit A and in a form approved by the Town Attorney. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June 2019. ________________________________ Dave Chapin, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Tammy Nagel, Town Clerk Resolution No. 28, Series of 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 402 of 404 Resolution No. 28, Series of 2019 June 18, 2019 - Page 403 of 404 VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO I T E M /T O P I C: A djournment 9:00 p.m. (estimate) June 18, 2019 - Page 404 of 404