Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 Traffic Impact Study - Lionshead Redevelopment T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y 1 I ' Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Vail,Colorado ' Prepared for Vail Resorts Development Company ' 137 Benchmark Road P.O. Box 959 Avon,CO 81620 1 Prepared By Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. 950 Seventeenth Street ' Suite 1050 s� b \��' Denver,Colorado 80202 ' F('?.-,pco (303)228-2300 : ' (303)446-8678 FAX � ' 36355 "'• .•••• 1 September 2004 �`�FS��������E�\ ' P %`•IONA1- t This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study ' Page i I TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ii ILIST OF FIGURES iii ILIST OF TABLES iv APPENDICES iv 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 7 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 12 3.1 Existing and Future Roadway Network 12 I3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes 14 3.3 Future Traffic Conditions without Project 16 I4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 19 4.1 Trip Generation 19 1 4.2 Trip Distribution 23 4.3 Traffic Assignment 23 I4.4 Total Post Development Traffic 23 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSES 37 I6.0 CONCLUSIONS 51 I I I I I i t I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page ii I I ILIST OF FIGURES I Figure 1 -Site Location 8 Figure 2-Study Area 9 I Figure 3-Existing Laneage and Control 13 Figure 4- Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15 Figure 5-2005 Background Pre Development Traffic Volumes 17 IFigure 6-2025 Background Pre Development Traffic Volumes 18 I Figure 7-Hotel Expansion on West Day Lot Trip Distribution 24 Figure 8-Core Area Retail Redevelopment Trip Distribution 25 I Figure 9-Core Area Non Retail Redevelopment Trip Distribution 26 Figure 10-Recreational Homes (Tennis Court Site) Trip Distribution 27 I — Figure 11 -North Day Lot Trip Distribution 28 Figure 12-Hotel Expansion on West Day Lot Traffic Assignment 29 IFigure 13-Core Area Retail Redevelopment Traffic Assignment 30 Figure 14-Core Area Non Retail Redevelopment Traffic Assignment 31 IFigure 15-Recreational Homes (Tennis Court Site) Traffic Assignment 32 Figure 16-North Day Lot Traffic Assignment 33 IFigure 17-Total Traffic Assignment 34 Figure 18-2005 Total Post Development Traffic Volumes 35 IFigure 19-2025 Total Post Development Traffic Volumes 36 Figure 20-2005 Level of Service Total Post Development 45 IFigure 21 -2025 Level of Service Total Post Development 46 Figure 22-Recommended Short Term Intersection Laneage and Control 47 IFigure 23-Recommended Long Term Intersection Laneage and Control 48 Figure 24-South Frontage Road Concept Design-Eastern Section 49 IFigure 25-South Frontage Road Concept Design-Western Section 50 I I I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 -Lionshead Redevelopment Net Project Traffic Generation 22 ' Table 2-South Frontage Road/Parking Structure Access LOS Results 39 ' Table 3-South Frontage Road/East Lionshead Circle LOS Results 40 Table 4-South Frontage Road/West Lionshead Circle (east portal) LOS Results 41 ' Table 5-South Frontage Road/West Lionshead Circle (west portal) LOS Results 42 Table 6-South Frontage Road/Forest Road LOS Results 43 APPENDICES ' Appendix A-Peak Hour Volume Count Sheets and Calculation Worksheets Appendix B-Trip Generation Worksheets ' Appendix C-HCS Intersection Analysis Worksheets 1 ' Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page iv I 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Vail Resorts currentl y p lans a redevelopment project within the exi sting Lionshead Village, in ' Vail,Colorado. The project is currently proposed to include the development or redevelopment of four separate areas. These areas being redeveloped include the West Day Lot, Lionshead Core Area,Tennis Court Site along Forest Road, and North Day Lot. As of the date of this study, the following project description identifies the current Vail Resorts' Lionshead Development program evaluated within this report: West Day Lot ' • 90 hotel units • 113 condos ' • 16 recreational/seasonal second homes Core Area ' • 85 hotel units • 70 condo units ' • 39,900 square feet of commercial space (retail and restaurant) • 75 parking spaces (to be made available to members of the Ski Club) ' Tennis Court site • 4 recreational/seasonal second home sites (each potentially being constructed as a ' duplex,creating a total of 8 units) North Day Lot ' • 144 beds of employee housing • 16,000 square feet of Vail Resorts offices (being relocated as part of the Core Area ' redevelopment) ' With the exception of the Core Site Hotel and the Tennis Court Site, the type and level of development outlined above are assumptions. This is particularly true with respect to the ' development of the North Day Lot and the West Day Lot where development plans are Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ' Traffic Impact Study Page 1 I 1 ' somewhat speculative at this time. The development assumptions used in this analysis do, p P Y however, represent a "worse-case" scenario relative to future trip generation and resultant impacts to the surrounding road system. ' As such, this traffic analysis should be considered a general overview of traffic impacts that Y g p may be expected from the Vail Resort projects. It is likely that refinements to development plans will result in changes to development levels (particularly on the North Day Lot and West Day Lot). In the event final development levels change significantly from the assumptions used ' in this traffic analysis,this report will need to be modified to reflect such changes. It is assumed that full development of this area is expected to occur around year 2005, and was therefore analyzed with this horizon. The analysis of a long-term 2025 horizon is also included ' within this study,as required by the Colorado Department of Transportation(CDOT). ' Regional access to the proposed redevelopment is expected to continue to be provided by I-70. Primary access will be gained from the South Frontage Road. Direct access to the Core Area is ' to be gained from Lionshead Place/West Lionshead Circle for hotel guests. Commercial attracted trips are expected to use both the Lionshead Parking Structure and the Core Parking ' Structure. West Lionshead Circle and Forest Road will provide direct access to the hotel expansion on the West Day Lot. Access to the residential development at the tennis court site will be along Forest Road. West Lionshead Circle will provide access to the North Day Lot for the office and employee housing units being relocated there. The purpose of this study is to identify traffic generation characteristics, identify potential ' traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified Vail Resorts development impacts. Additionally, the Town of Vail requested that ' this report analyze traffic conditions at the following five roadway intersections: • South Frontage Road and Lionshead Village Parking Structure Access • South Frontage Road and East Lionshead Circle Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ' Traffic Impact Study Page 2 1 • South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (east portal) • South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (west portal) ' • South Frontage Road and Forest Road Four of these intersections provide direct access to the proposed redevelopment sites and will have an associated increase in traffic. The fifth intersection of South Frontage Road and East Lionshead Circle was included based upon Town of Vail request. This study has been prepared in accordance with the Town of Vail traffic study scope. The entire Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Project is expected to generate approximately 167 morning peak hour and 207 afternoon peak hour new vehicle trips added to ' the surrounding street network. It is important to consider that the Core Area currently contains uses that add to current traffic conditions. In order to provide the most accurate ' analysis, credit was taken for the existing employee housing, office, and retail trips currently generated by the site. Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the Master Plan's Lionshead ' Village Transportation Analysis prepared for the Town of Vail by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (October 1998) and the street system expected to exist in the future. Distributions were ' prepared separately for the development areas/lots based upon differences in site location and site access. Assignment of project traffic was based upon the trip generation described previously and the distribution developed. ' Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Vail Resorts Lionshead Redevelopment will be successfully incorporated into the future traffic operations ' with the planned Frontage Road improvements. The proposed project development and expected traffic volumes resulted in the following conclusions: i Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 3 I • The expected net increase in vehicular traffic for the identified Vail Resorts Lionshead redevelopment combined is 167 morning and 207 afternoon peak hour trips. • Near Term Improvements Needed Today without Vail Resorts' Projects: o Separate northbound left and right turn lanes at the intersection of ' the Parking Structure with South Frontage Road o Dedicated westbound left turn lane at the intersection of the Parking Structure with South Frontage Road o Dedicated eastbound right turn lane at the intersection of the Parking tStructure with South Frontage Road (per CDOT State Highway Access Code) ' o Separate northbound left and right turn lanes at the intersection of East Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road ' o Dedicated westbound left turn lane at the intersection of East Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road o Dedicated eastbound right turn lane at the intersection of East Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road (per CDOT State ' Highway Access Code) o Dedicated westbound left turn lane at both east and west portal ' intersections of West Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road o Dedicated eastbound right turn lane at the west portal intersection of West Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road (per CDOT State Highway Access Code) o Dedicated eastbound and westbound left turn lanes at the intersection of Forest Road with South Frontage Road I • Near Term(2005) Improvements Needed With All Vail Resorts' Projects: ' o No additional near term improvements needed as a result of adding project traffic Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ' Traffic Impact Study Page 4 I t • Long Term(2025) Improvements Needed Without Vail Resorts' Projects: o Dedicated eastbound right turn lane at the east portal intersection of I West Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road (per CDOT State I Highway Access Code) o Separate northbound left and right turn lanes at the west portal I intersection of West Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road o Acceleration lane for northbound to eastbound right turning vehicles I exiting the Parking Structure at the South Frontage Road 1 I • Long Term(2025) Improvements Needed with All Vail Resorts' Projects: o Separate northbound left and right turn lanes at the west portal I intersection of West Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road Ate. I • No right turn acceleration lanes along the South Frontage Road are necessary due to the 25-mile per hour speed limit of the roadway, per CDOT State Highway Access Code. However as previously identified,in the long term 2025 horizon I p y g o a right turn acceleration I lane would benefit northbound to eastbound right turning vehicles exiting the parking Istructure. It is recommended that the Town of Vail monitor volumes at this intersection in the future to determine if and when this improvement may provide benefit to Iintersection operations. • Left turn deceleration lanes with storage plus taper length (7.5:1) should be provided at locations with a projected left turn peak hour vehicle volume movement greater than 25 Ivehicles per hour per the CDOT State Highway Access Code. Based upon expected traffic volumes these left turn lanes were found to be warranted at the South Frontage IRoad intersections with the Lionshead Parking Structure access, East Lionshead Circle, east portal of West Lionshead Circle, west portal of West Lionshead Circle, and Forest Road. It is understood that the Town of Vail has planned that South Frontage Road be designed and constructed with an auxiliary continuous bi-directional center left turn Ilane at and through the study area. This center turn lane would provide dedicated left Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 5 1 turn deceleration and storage lanes at the key intersections to separate left turn vehicles S Y p from the through movements. In addition, this shared center turn lane may further ' improve operations of the intersections by providing northbound (and southbound at Forest Road/Maintenance site intersection) left-turning vehicles a refuge or accelerate zone before entering the main stream of traffic along the frontage road. • Right turn deceleration lanes with storage len gth p lus taper length should be provided ' at locations with a projected right turn peak hour vehicle volume movement greater than 50 vehicles per hour per the CDOT State Highway Access Code. Therefore, right ' turn lanes are expected for the eastbound approaches at the Parking Structure entrance East Lionshead Circle, and the west portal of West Lionshead Circle. These right turn deceleration lanes should be constructed based upon the recommended storage length plus the 7.5 to 1 taper. This results in a right turn lane of 150 feet at the Parking Structure access and 250 feet at the west portal intersection of West Lionshead Circle. ' Therefore,based upon the analysis and results from this study, it is important to recognize that the existing South Frontage Road is currently operating over capacity. Improvements identified ' within this report will greatly improve the operations of the South Frontage Road and Lionshead area intersections for both existing traffic and future traffic with the addition of all ' Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment projects. Overall, Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment projects add a small percentage of traffic to the area and do not determine the ' need for improvements beyond what is already needed today. However, Vail Resorts will participate in improvements along South Frontage Road per the Town of Vail's impact fee. The 1 next step is to develop a phasing plan and determine the allocation of Vail Resorts' impact fee in developing these improvements. 1 1 1 Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ' Traffic Impact Study Page 6 1 3: I 2.0 INTRODUCTION IKim ley-Horn and Ass oc iat es, Inc. (Kim ley-Horn) has been retained by Vail Resorts to prepare Ithis report to document the results of a Traffic Impact Study of future traffic conditions associated with the proposed Lionshead Redevelopment project located along the south side of Ithe I-70 South Frontage Road in Lionshead Village in Vail, Colorado. The vicinity map illustrating the project location is shown in Figure 1. 1 The purpose of this study is to identify trip generation characteristics, potential traffic related 1 impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. This study has been prepared in accordance with Town of Vail standards and includes Level of Service (LOS) analysis performed for identified study area intersections. This stud I ( ) Y p Y study specifically includes evaluation of the following key intersections as shown in Figure 2: I • South Frontage Road and Lionshead Village Parking Structure Access • South Frontage Road and East Lionshead Circle I • South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (east portal) k • South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (west portal) I • South Frontage Road and Forest Road I I I I I ( I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 7 I 1 i IN I oNi 1 v 1 NORTH 1 NTS 067867001 I I I a. LIONSHEAD VILLAGE` I . e� - ,, "�, VAIL VILLAGE t± 4, a 9t I y" x; u L.. ''''l I I r I FIGURE 1 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I SITE LOCATION Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Kimley-Horn Page 8 Iir and Associates,Inc. i NTS 067867001 I NORTH LEGEND I • Study Area Key Intersection I TENNIS COURT SITE C•P k fTP I Go MOTEL EXPANSION -"-- I ' ST DAYLOT) _ ) I ( fMAINTE4' FA011ff'! yPO PROF 1 J "�,� ARRwTT GARGLE SOUPF.. THEM ti p t r _`�''' . t .J , :.. I ._...: �O ..i @ AIL ,r.., , ,'..'. T LIONSHEAD O r—z »-, i C' + O _ , LANDMAR L, 004 _ 'WEST S pU LIONSHEAD V LLAGE � pOpO NORTH DAY LT _ T(P 41 PARKING STRUCTURE 4... i.3 SNFaO NO, 1-70 EASTBOUND I-70 WESTBOUND i . I FIGURE 2 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I STUDY AREA Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Kimley Hom Page 9 I \H MII�Mr1 and Associates,Inc. I The project is currently pro osed to include the development and or redevelopment of four Iseparate parcels: I West Day Lot • 90 hotel units I • 113 condos • 16 recreational/seasonal second homes ICore Area • 85 hotel units I • 70 condo units • 39,900 square feet of commercial space (retail and restaurant) I • 75 parking spaces(to be made available to members of the Ski Club) Tennis Court site I • 4 recreational/seasonal second home sites (each potentially being constructed as a duplex,creating a total of 8 units) INorth Day Lot • 144 beds of employee housing I • 16,000 square feet of Vail Resorts offices (being relocated as part of the Core Area Iredevelopment) I With the exception of the Core Site Hotel and the Tennis Court Site, the type and level of Idevelopment outlined above are assumptions. This is particularly true with respect to the development of the North Day Lot and the West Day Lot where development plans are Isomewhat speculative at this time. The development assumptions used in this analysis do, however, represent a "worse-case" scenario relative to future trip generation and resultant Iimpacts to the surrounding road system. As such, this traffic analysis should be considered a general overview of traffic impacts that may be expected from the Vail Resort projects. It is likely that refinements to development Iplans will result in changes to development levels (particularly on the North Day Lot and West Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 10 I Da Lot). In the event final development levels change significantly from the assumptions used Y ) p g � Y p in this traffic analysis,this report will need to be modified to reflect such changes. It is assumed that full development would occur prior to 2005,and was therefore analyzed with this horizon year. CDOT and the Town of Vail have also requested a long-term 2025 horizon be analyzed within this study. 1 I 1 t Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ' Traffic Impact Study Page 11 1 I 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing and Future Roadway Network 9 Y Primary access to all four sites is expected to be provided by the existing South Frontage Road. ' Direct access to the Core Area is to be gained from both Lionshead Place/West Lionshead Circle for hotel guests. Commercial attracted trips are expected use both the Lionshead and Core Area Parking Structures. West Lionshead Circle and Forest Road will provide direct access to the hotel expansion on the West Day Lot. Access to the residential development at the tennis court ' site will be along Forest Road. West Lionshead Circle will provide access to the office and I employee housing on the North Day Lot. The Town of Vail identified five project intersections along these roadways for evaluation: • South Frontage Road and Lionshead Village Parking Structure Access • South Frontage Road and East Lionshead Circle • South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (east portal) • South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (west portal) • South Frontage Road and Forest Road ' South Frontage Road is a CDOT roadway (classification F-R) with one travel lane in each direction along the south side of Interstate 70. Primarily, the frontage road is located north of ' Lionshead Village. The roadway has a speed limit of 25 miles per hour through the project area. East Lionshead Circle and West Lionshead Circle serve as collector roadways with one lane of ' travel in each direction. Forest Road serves as a local roadway with one lane in each direction. The intersections of these roadways with the South Frontage Road are stop controlled on the 1 minor street approach with free flow movements along the Frontage Road. Existing lane configurations and traffic control at the key intersections studied are shown in Figure 3. A' I i x Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 12 I 1 NTS 067867001 I NORTH LEGEND E • Study Area Key Intersection IRoadway Speed Limit CpStop Controlled Approach I I TENNIS COURT SITE 4, ., I Gone a-`� G -- HOTEL EXPANSION :. zi .., t AHTLE.Rs jI ._ y ANCE FACILITY } t MAINTEN O P 4 N... : t SY� �CF : 1' UPR THE MARRI° i , p CIR,� t.�... I . FION , y1Fp° `�, i -. COftE AREA l I !� V,. W ST _I ' .= (-00.! , AIL ..1 EAST LIONSHEAD e- P ........_.— �c i.-✓ I '1)44-DMARK LODE S qI ... ,,°...._.... 1'' y .NORTH DAY LOT �a°p.O �Nf PIARMNGSSTTRILUCTURE ! i ; ...— , It �fR°NS PG 1-70 EAST6°UND' ND \/1-70 WESTBTw 4)C 40 , 1111°iiiii t. r I FIGURE 3 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I EXISTING LANEAGE AND CONTROL Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study I \*I"mill Kimley-Hom Page 13 J con and Associates,Inc. I 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing peak period turning movement counts were conducted at the three intersections adjacent to the redevelopment project site on Friday,July 5th from 8:00 to 11:30 AM and 3:00 to 5:30 PM per Town of Vail's request. These time periods were chosen by the Town to represent ' the maximum adjacent street peak hour volume as these were believed to vary from the typical 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM time periods. These summer turning movement counts were then compared to counts conducted on President's Day Weekend 1997 from the Lionshead Village Transportation Analysis conducted by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (October 1998). Comparisons of the traffic volumes conducted during the winter and summer holiday weekends found that the peak wintertime conditions had the higher traffic volume associated with it. These winter morning and afternoon peak hour turning movement counts at the key intersections are shown in Figure 4. Detailed traffic count sheets are available in Appendix B. It is important to note that traffic volumes for the Lionshead Village Parking Structure and East Lionshead Circle were taken directly from the Iwintertime counts due to a majority of the traffic at these intersections being created by skier traffic. I 1 I 1 Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment rTraffic Impact Study Page 14 I r NTS 067867001 I NORTH LEGEND 1Z.,, - . • Study Area Key Intersection IXX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes IS DOUR S - ITE / O ::: :...Y WWTP - HOTEL E%PANSION (WEST my LOT) 1 �!, _ l ANCE FACIRl • O P c t,_ ' � Ni -\ ORCE MANT r''yOU I HE i ;. } -.� .� � --WEST r W„ 5- EAST LIONSHEAD i 1 t..-u.-•; S C ,.., p0 Goo i vwL a ��eERo ..___...._.._ !F , A LANDMARK i M H,pOt1 t o, , NORTH DAY LOT ... E�O� ,. 5 LIONSHEAD VILLAGE t t, a 4 : LPG PARKNG STRUC URE �. Iv,'I _00,1 0 0 1.70 EAST8WND cl. \ - 1 IOUND T 6 Cam% 1111111111iiii I-70 NESTS ,\V \x10.\� / I mN N. m � /, N r-94(56) ���'sl 1G ' `�I `� f-286(374) co r___,121so1 1 m 156(99) 30�K33 v e. 298(372) m —114(92) `1 `O O 324(340) o �cp 17:1 '2 n , I 85(105) 246(415) —p 23391 I I FIGURE 4 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Kimley-Hom Page 15 I ��n and Associates,Inc. 3.3 Future Traffic Conditions without Project To accurately determine the impact of the redevelopment project, traffic volumes expected at ' the time of project buildout were necessary. These traffic volumes were determined for the future prior to the addition of project traffic from the redevelopment project, called the ' background condition. The 2005 background pre development traffic volumes were obtained by first applying a 15 percent growth rate to the 1997 traffic volumes to obtain counts comparable to counts conducted along South Frontage Road in 2000. A 2 percent annual ' growth rate was then applied to the South Frontage Road to obtain 2005 background traffic projections. This growth rate was obtained from the Lionshead Village Transportation Analysis ' prepared by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (October 1998). This growth rate was based upon the historical and expected growth in skiers to Vail as provided in the Master Plan. Background ' traffic volumes for 2005 are shown in Figure 5. ' The Town of Vail and CDOT guidelines also requested that a long-term 2025 analysis be provided. A 2 percent growth rate was provided and used to represent growth from the short- ' term 2005 horizon until the long-term 2025 horizon along South Frontage Road. In addition, other future Lionshead Redevelopment projects anticipated in the site vicinity included within the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan completed by FHU were added to these long term projections. Background pre development traffic volumes for 2025 are shown in Figure 6. 1 1 I 1 1 Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 16 I NTS 067867001 I LEGEND NJ<>FI-1-1--1 • Study Area Key Intersection ;,. I XX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes I ..', A.,::::.-,,::„..-'."..•-e,-... ',. I .. ,. .... .............._.,..... I TENNITAT ! " 9P I 01::::i: ..: _— , 1F I / -----1 ! 1 01113::::::::::::0:' ( cE F tc ur( -, , 1,:: --:,,n-rr ., ,.... 4. •• a,,,-"'opS. THE.tAkil— "':::'::::::':::'::::::::K'K: U ... 6e5'''''-' ,.1 1 +09 `-•:' ',' , \e, I ,1 WEST ?-' .i 4 V), , „ . ••,:, _lummie roo$::r— E* ' s',„„i---" I '".•••■.../". 1 L - EAST OONSHEAD 0 i ---.,-Ac..,_ colpoef.0.9 50‘5V''' / *IND NORTH DAY LO ,,,...„ 0 I LIONSHEAD VILLAGE ! 1-- ',1-•1 11' 1:2:::Fpg:,:i:i:::::::.=:::... I PARKING STRUCTURE i -„a. Li 10001‘, 411.'*-1°14:' 1 4g11-' <_„," c.,\ ., 1-70 EASIBOUND,40 ‘1. 1\ S, I VIIIIMINNomima '-7°w E sT8°u 1 % \i f\ i;f% 4) \''..',c„C!C .••."3 I 1 c0 ^ , 0, a- 1 c'NJ c0 <-375(475) 20(730) ---1, . 10(35) 7 ik ‘-,---, To,1-, 180(115) c--3505 ,..e„,' s90k405) kla a a II 470(520) —, rs, ii3- 0-L" g- r---145(120) 17:73 CD E-395(420) ci? \ JI 85l95' 4 -. I 110(135) _.._ 390(565) --, 05551 FIGURE 5 I VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' 2005 BACKGROUND PRE DEVELOPMENT I TRAFFIC VOLUMES Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 17 \... Kimley-Hom J • I . ■rnillir 1 and Associates,Inc. C NTS 067867001 I ORTH LEGEND NJ EINZ , 0 Study Area Key Intersection IXX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes TENNISCOlN3T[t���': `: SITE 1 OP _ __ VNnP iCO,i, G „HOTEL EXPANSION / / (WEST DAV LOT) __ -, „I ANTLERS ; J_, ;.. I r / 3 %MAIN TENANCEFACRfTY ;.. t W'���P� �'(qCF I i I + �. w"x UTA i THE wso rF .�.> GLR E i,....---...,.,..J = y,oREAREA___...... :�Orj WEST i.; , 4 i 7,:r3,-t, -i t_3 EAST LIONSHEAD n t --_.l 1--..u-.. z C' Gp.O i LANDMARK ' �„, ASP , ,NORTH DAV LOT s ��GPp I LIONSHEAD VILLAGE PG PARKING STRUCTURE } t } .._ I{-. _may * 1,�� -pf, W O o/,/ yC 1-70 EAST80UND / � �R �s I I.70 VJESTBGUND \ .. 11111 I ,iiriscr-,,.. c‘,,o`y co ' E'''' r`-135(95) 20030)1 E-595(690) X35 y 0 ,40501 205(115) -- h o 655(800) -145(120) F-640(665) 050 110(135) --3 50951 590(860) ,, I FIGURE 6 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT 2025 BACKGROUND PRE DEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I Lionshead Redevelopment TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic Impact Study Kimley-Hom Page 18 J I r:::2/1 and Associates,Inc. .1. I t I4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS I4.1 Trip Generation I Site-generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generation. Rates are applied to proposed land uses to estimate traffic generated by developments during a specific time interval. The acknowledged source for trip I generation rates is the current edition of the Trip Generation Report] published by Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). ITE has I Iestablished trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses. Based upon a request from the Town of Vail for this study, Kimley-Horn used ITE Trip Generation Report trip rates that apply Ito Apartment(220),General Office Building (710),Resort Hotel (330),Recreational Homes (260), and Residential Condominium/Townhouse (230) for traffic associated with the development. ILikewise, as agreed upon with the Town of Vail, trip generation rates from the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan prepared by Felsburg Holt& Ullevig were used for the retail uses Iproposed at the Core Area. ITE does not provide trip generation rates for the skier club membership program and the parking spaces provided to ski club members along with the Imembership. Therefore, it was necessary to develop a specific trip generation rate for this land use apart from ITE.The following paragraphs describe the project by development area, as well Ias project traffic volumes associated with the redevelopment project. t IWest Day Lot j. The West Day Lot located just west of West Lionshead Circle along the South Frontage Road is Ianticipated to be developed with 90 hotel rooms, 113 condos, and 16 recreational/seasonal second homes. This development would replace the 160 on-mountain employee parking Ispaces, already relocated to the Holy Cross/Maintenance Site Trip generation for the 90 hotel rooms was based on ITE Land Use Code: Resort Hotel (330). The 113 condos were estimated for 111 trip generation based upon ITE Land Use Code: Condominium/Townhouse (230) and the 16 recreational/seasonal second homes were estimated for trip generation based upon ITE Land I ] Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation: An Information Report, Seventh Edition, I Washington DC,2003. t Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 19 I I I Use Code: Recreational Homes 260 . These ITE Land Uses are believed to be the most appropriate to estimate trip generation based upon development characteristics. I I Core Area The Core Area redevelopment located along Lionshead Place is planned to consist of 70 condo units, 85 hotel rooms, and 39,900 square feet of supporting retail uses. This development I would replace 32,480 square feet of commercial space (retail and restaurant), 18,000 square feet I of offices, and 100 employee beds. All of these existing uses were anticipated to previously generate vehicle trips. Since the existing Core Area consists of development generating vehicle I trips, credit was taken for these existing trips previously generated by the site, as the commercial (retail and restaurant) will be redeveloped on the existing site and the employee �: Ihousing and office uses will be relocated to the North Day Lot. 1 ITrip generation for the existing offices was calculated using ITE Land Use Code: Office (710). The proposed hotel rooms were calculated using ITE Land Use Code: Resort Hotel (330). Trip Igeneration was calculated for the retail space using the rates provided for retail in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan prepared by FHU. The proposed condo trip generation Iwas calculated using ITE Land Use Code:Residential Condominium/Townhouse (230). IThe proposed ski club is anticipated to have 75 members who will have parking privileges at the Core Area. These club members will be allocated 75 parking spaces within the parking Istructure beneath the Core Area building. On a typical busy weekend day, all parking spaces are anticipated to be occupied. Therefore,the parking spaces are expected to attract 75 entering Iand 75 exiting, or 150 total trips per day. To determine the number of trips that would occur during a common peak hour, information was obtained relative to anticipated club member Iactivity. Based upon information from Vail Resorts and modified at the Town of Vail's request, it is expected that approximately 33 percent of skiers arrive within a common peak hour. I Therefore, the resultant trip generation for the Ski Club would be 25 vehicle trips during the pg P g peak hour. These trips would most likely be seen as 25 enterin g vehicles during the morning Ipeak hour and 25 exiting vehicles during the afternoon peak hour. Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 20 1 Applicable assumptions as presented in the Town of Vail's Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and Lionshead Village Transportation Analysis were followed with this study. This included the 75 percent primary internal trip generation reduction within the Lionshead ' Transportation Analysis. Due to the pedestrian nature of Lionshead Village, a majority of the ' trips generated by the retail redevelopment in the Core Area are expected to be made by people who are already skiing and/or staying in the Lionshead area. In fact, it is believed that this ' percentage may even be greater. However, to be consistent with the Master Plan Study, the retail generation was reduced 75 percent to eliminate the double counting of trips following the same procedure used within the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Tennis Court Site The existing Tennis Court site located along Forest Road, just east of the Gondola line, is proposed to be developed with four (4) recreational/seasonal second home sites. However, each site may be constructed as a duplex. To provide a conservative analysis, trip generation ' was completed assuming 8 units total on this site To estimate vehicle trip generation from these future homes,the ITE Land Use Code: Recreational Homes (260)was used 1 iit North Day Lot The North Day Lot currently provides parking for 105 on-mountain employee vehicles. The North Day Lot is proposed to accommodate 144 beds of employee housing and approximately ' 16,000 square feet of Vail Resorts offices. The proposed development of 144 beds of employee housing on this site actually may not generate any new vehicle trips during the peak hour. Vail Resorts is planning that this housing may be for employees that do not need a vehicle and who will walk to and from work. To provide a conservative analysis, an estimate of vehicle trips for employees per ITE was assigned to the street network. To estimate the trip generation of the proposed office space and employee housing ITE Land Use Code: Office (710) and Apartments 1 (220) were used,respectively. f Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ' Traffic Impact Study Page 21 I I ITrip Generation Summary I Table 1 summarizes the estimated net traffic generation for the development. The trip generation worksheets are included in Appendix B. These calculations illustrate the rates used, directional distribution of trips, and number of daily trips. The calculations provide for the net I development to estimate new vehicle trips (future development minus existing development being removed) generated by Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment. New trips are vehicles I that are attracted to Vail by development of additional hotel rooms, dwelling units or retail space. Table 1 -Lionshead Redevelopment Net Project Traffic Generation IDevelopment Area AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total IWest Day Lot 31 50 81 58 43 101 I Core Area 20 21 41 27 34 61 ITennis Court Site 1 0 1 1 1 2 North Day Lot 28 16 44 16 27 43 ITotal 80 87 167 102 105 207 I I 1 I I I I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 22 I I 1 4.2 Tri p Distribution I Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the Lionshead Village Transportation Analysis prepared for the Town of Vail by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (October 1998) and the street system expected to exist in the future. The directional distribution of traffic I is a means to quantify the percentage of site-generated traffic that approaches a project site from a given direction and departs the site in the same direction. Distributions were prepared I separately for the West Day Lot, Core Area retail redevelopment, Core Area non retail Iredevelopment, Tennis Court site, and North Day Lot based upon differences in site location and access. Figures 7 through 11 illustrate the expected project trip distribution for the hotel Iexpansion on the West Day Lot site, Core Area retail and non retail redevelopment, Tennis Court site,and North Day Lot,respectively. 4.3 Traffic Assignment ITraffic assignment was obtained by applying the above distributions to the estimated traffic generation. Project traffic assignment for the hotel expansion on the West Day Lot, Core Area Iredevelopment, Tennis Court site, and North Day Lot are shown in Figures 12 through 16, respectively. Figure 17 illustrates the total traffic assignment for the entire Vail Resorts' ILionshead Redevelopment projects. 1 4.4 Total Post Development Traffic Site traffic volumes were added to the background volumes to represent estimated traffic Iconditions for full project development. Total traffic volumes that include the entire planned Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment project are illustrated in Figure 18 for the 2005 horizon I Iand Figure 19 for the 2025 horizon. It is important to recognize that the 2025 volumes include traffic anticipated due to other future Lionshead Redevelopment projects not associated with IVail Resorts' per the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. I I I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 23 I fl NTS 067867001 NORTH I LEGEND Limn Study Area Key Intersection I .XX%(XX%) Entering(Exiting)Trip Distribution TENNIS COURT SITE ,400/ oP Fs o I 'Po . HOTELDAYLOTION (WEST DAY LOT) ! ERS t I IV 1 .NTENANCE FAO N. �.�.... TT. .._ LE *-'�`.! ,.N�uPRr4 THE MPRRIO i.\� 01119, p ty _ ,, I ,..:CORE AREAL .. WEST V t._' I� ' NZ ! _._ AIL EAST LIONSHEAD P F I !.-u-i i ILO pA i .. �.LANDMARK.4 L 'NORTH DAY LOT . ..:.. �y°P9 5 LIONSHEAD VILLAGE i F P,GE PARKING STRUCTURE ( E };r} I o�Fao N 4 :,,,_._..„„......_ __ 55%..... 1.70 EASTBOUND <3 II.70 WESTBOUND <11 0." 1 ,V 1 1 N ,v J i I o.41 ''''''''''',., I FIGURE 7 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT HOTEL EXPANSION ON WEST DAY LOT Vail Resorts' I TRIP DISTRIBUTION Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Kimley-Hom Page 24 I H ama and Associates,Inc. I NTS 067867001 I NORTH LEGEND I • Study Area Key Intersection XX%(XX%) Entering(Exiting)Trip Distribution I I I 1211110? - T TENNIS COUR xi. El SITE / is O s:_ 4„ .. rrprtP i ' IO 0 F GP P'� p0� ..' '':_:::' ' HOTEL EXPANSION •.,.... .I ... _ .. ..:._.. (WEST DAY L07) :': /' i :{ ' ANTLERS i —_ t'- NIAINTENANOE FACILITY } PPP° P46;—/ ; - ... f .. \. ---'-p..51---fl i'^ MARRpT7r-� OW f I ' CORE AREA) \T WEST V 1, v-„ � _.: ._� Pia,._., r C�'� �VNL SPA, ,.'__ . ........ EAST LIDNSHEAD n t a ?-- y LANDM A RC., 4.,; ; 6 01,01' O P i 11013TH LOT - 00,0 C' 55% O� LONSHEAD VILLAGE �_-, .t . ; . PARKING STRUCTURE _. ER • 70 EASTBOUND I1 I.70 WESTBOUND i .. f O% \ /0Io � O \ 28%— 27%—> y ii 2i< l I I FIGURE 8 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT CORE AREA REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I RETAIL TRIP DISTRIBUTION Lionshead Redevelopment Impact Study Kimley-Hom Page 25 I ' con and Associates,Inc. i NTS 067867001 I NO®RTH ® .® LEGEND I • Study Area Key Intersection XX%(XX%) Entering(Exiting)Trip Distribution I ITENNIS COURT 617E / � �wwTP 0 R P O '. .. .....:-. O�4 - - :;HOTEL E%PANSKIN ::' -- -,. ....._..� i ..(WEST DAY LOT) �/ . / 4 I CE PAC0.R'C '_ .� .;: NIAINTENAN N... _zz r.;„ s. fix. "' irTNEtodk TT 1, C,,K• ....�., I 'WN I C 1 _._ ' I y tCORE AREgE WEST ' 2. � ��..., NAIL SPA r EAST LIONSHEAD o 1.,__, i..•--- ' :...,., C�l.O OW ........ ........_.._. 4C� t .. -.._1 LANDMARK LODGE USAGE\le, i Vrwd s LIONSHEAD VILLAGE I t ; NORTH DAY LOT �EaOP'D 1 , � S PARKING STRUCTURE i t N"�f0.°N 1 55°/D I-70 EASTBOUND I I 70 WESTBOUND .. a h W s �,10°I° 0,3i �� y h 1 I FIGURE 9 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT CORE AREA REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' NON RETAIL TRIP DISTRIBUTION Lionshead Redevelopment Impact Study Kimley-Hom Page 26 I H IM I::IIIIII Fli and Associates,Inc. f 1 NTS 067867001 I NORTH coin LEGEND II . Study Area Key Intersection XX%(XX%) Entering(Exiting)Trip Distribution I 1 1 %TENMS COURT''f'?<>. :.'l SITE .,-. 'R t .��T P 1 I RF GP °-9' -..' O £ 1 - -' 1 � :.��WEST OAV LOION1 �: �J I .i -' ANTLERS t � 1 i i t i % EFACIUT'i EN MAM A f tS •"SOUS THE MARRIOTTi C1RSc�E i i -.,Yt Wr, ,S WEST ;.., P.n! A �; LVNL SPA:'. tl. 1 III EAST LgNSHEAD O t 1..-- ...._ ..,...._......_.__...- _...._..�., \`t" ..,.. 3.-„^-' LANDMARK LD�.7E Ea°N,TPO I was, ocN a, NORTH DAY LOT 9 EaOPD I .:4‘■: LIONSHEAD VILLAGE '•PARKING STRUCTURE 1 ...t, j .. �.�FR°�� 55°/G E� N I I-770W EASTBOUND I-70 WESTBOUND 45* s 1 sE g I FIGURE 10 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT RECREATIONAL HOMES (TENNIS COURT SITE) Vail Resorts' I Lionshead Redevelopment TRIP DISTRIBUTION Traffic Impact Study Kimley.Hom Page 27 J I E='' and Associates,Inc. °° W" I\ NTS 067867001 I WORTH LEGEND =Z Study Area Key Intersection XX%(XX%) Entering(Exiting)Trip Distribution TENNIS count :-'w T PS 't ,..r,o I GO HF GP OIO "'.rte tt, ,.... ._.... __ '__- _ -..{ .:(WEST DAY LOT)) .,;' 1 s _' LERS T _�...._. ANT ..i __x L - / '' j�ENANOE,,,."- '! v,*-. r..,-�"`J1NE MPRit10TT y. � 01RQ� �'� ;.. t t ' 00,--, ,5} i rL_.. yP t ...r- J CORE AREAt§: .,.ee Wn_ 1 ' � .i A VNL S EAST LIONSHEAD O� !.--.,-' •r :..,. VNL E i../�� SPOE(aOPO -' 1,. .._s. �p ARK L,.r�' �FPO� NORTH DAY LOT 5 EP LIONSHEAD VILLAGE 5 PARKING STRUCTURE ( j�..;.,�.. i k?i - FiO� I S 3 5% TO EASTBOUND I I-7OWESTBOUND 0 V. W 1 (5%) ...._.1 r Io c_too c c�I� I ° I I FIGURE 11 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT NORTH DAY LOT Vail Resorts' I TRIP DISTRIBUTION Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Kimley-Hom Page 28 I Eon and Associates,Inc. C 1 NTS 067867001 I LEGEND NORTH • Study Area Key Intersection XX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes t I I _ I TENNIS COURT_ 11, SITE / v'''' L.; i I F pO cogF Q�� _ _- G :: ::Y € _ HOTEL EXPANSION_ (WEST DAY LOT) j § ANTLERS I l r.1 grew'CE FACILITY N.,...__,..,. +-,`.; �' r....-d U , t THE MARiWTT k• � dR� I _. . 1 �IGNSa'x Si , WEST rj"1 i. Y ,1). RE ANEA -FipO��--f p EAST LpNSHEAD c 3 ,,.._.i .,,--- i f `) r.._„ ....._._._..._-.._._ (' LAN »i ._. SOU RN WV LO 0a 0 LIONSHEAD VILLAGE 1 i - ' _ PARKING STRUCTURE I IC 4 1 I } ___ �L.�.TfP�` - T� 4L--. ------' I-70 EASTBOUND .`\ \ I I_TO WESTBOUND /,�\ 111 0 � �C • y 'I. �� I op 0 ,/2412 /` I O ` W N ?O(17) 0) 22(19) 7 T >1 a� I FIGURE 12 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT t>' HOTEL EXPANSION ON WEST DAY LOT Vail Resorts' 111 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Fri Kimley-Hom Page 29 Iand Associates,Inc. NTS 067867001 LEGEND NORTH • Study Area Key Intersection ELNy . IXX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ■ I TE 3 COIMT'%? ,p SITE / op .,. WWTV t GORE ���� . : It) ,.... `'HOTELEXPANSIONE+ii' __».._ ........._...... ,_. __ j i _ .- I + ANTLERS t' F . t .__ MNT E N ANCE FACLfY , �O ilk �C _ ,` B ^aR TR10Tf . CR E j` � THE M ` ARFwl r,.r` S WEST n, :�', i Li 1, n‘, ._.._. EAST LIONSHEAD O 1, l.,__ _ r'�� O �c >--- -,-, L LANDMARK,; L-,,r 0Oel1� ` LIONSHEAD VILLAGE ( ? :NORTH DAY LOT 5°� D �0ao►A iPARKING STRUCTURE i i i i s L J. 1 70 EASTBOUND I1-70 WESTBOUND /O/0 r ./ I o � Op) —oo 00)0,0) T I 1(1) o �O0 , I o I 0(t)-) 0(0) �olol of»� I FIGURE 13 I VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT CORE AREA REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I RETAIL TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study IC]mrl Kimley-Hom Page 30 Iand Associates,Inc. i C 1 NTS 067867001 I LEGEND NO®RTH • Study Area Key Intersection ',71 IXX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes I 1%::TENNIS COURT SITE ::I O,p = y,N`fTP 'CORE ?04 POs /'_ ...........:.!..-:.....!...!...7 , OTEL EXPANSION ;__ i ANTLERS : t ./ ,,,vs) PF _ /MNTETIANCE":17: t S 't"" p,RRIOTT..,J cIR9EE „:::::,::::„,::::::::::,::::::.R:::, I SpU _ THEM ' Sp ; i v.'- ""'I _..(C ORE AREA ' '->� WEST r I, NZ j , r_...�'S .:. _., A AIL.. - y EAST LIONSHEAD 0 't i.-- _// .......__......_..___-_ �` < '-' LANDMARK ; LDOGE TP we-sT_. d. NORTH DAY LOT S� RoP9 LpNSHEAD VILLAGE 3 9 _..3 1' POE PARKING STRUCTURE r .�FRo l I z .4 ---i--....... —............_ 1 I TD EASTBOUND k.TO WESTBOUND il I 60)j ,a c_.31A� 0(0)to r ii 1\h°� 00 1 I . FIGURE 14 I VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT CORE AREA REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I NON RETAIL TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Lionshead Redevelo me t Traffic Impact-SStudy I Kimley-Hom Page 31 J C:lII and Associates,Inc. ' / NTS 067867001 1 ILEGEND NORTH • Study Area Key Intersection IXX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes I I I7Er«�s:coURT: :_* O 1 / P � o 'Ds'-': ,..,._ - wWTP 4- __ _ _ i'HOTEL EXPANSION:- ?::riii:stria .$ii::::::: ........ , _ :.�:.:::.(WEST Ay LOT) i ; I "`ANTLERS 7 / 1 �// ? i�MNNTENANCE FAC,,„- I i 19 Oli. 4oF S t,1 L.I . NOUPF� THE MARR%O l \J._ CpRChLE J i ti r i t``�-^ _.. WEST ........_.icoREANEA( r 'C,.. r--� / �.%i . • __;;::'r-x:::=-:;:=__-:;:=::iii_:iii._:-:: ,: L, VNL•-It �AIL. \ r l r: ` t..t ..- „. w,.. EAST LgNSHEAD o � i ?---�,--+ i ' :. LANDMARK I CD'L E WET - 5� op,0 1 NORTH DAV LOT- _ rr AFL LIONSHEAD VILLAGE 1 4r-"1 (fii }( 0,4 I PARKING STRUCTURE i i ,._, ,3, ----... ER ' ‘ '--.'•-------- TBOUND I I-TO EAS I-70 WESTBOUND ir c..._-.•00 O I 4---- I FIGURE 15 I VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT RECREATIONAL HOMES (TENNIS COURT SITE) Vail Resorts' I Lionshead Redevelopment TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Traffic Impact Study Kimley Hom Page 32 I con and Associates,Inc. ItNTS 067867001 ILEGEND NO RTH • Study Area Key Intersection _ XX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes g. I ITENNIS coml.t�.::_' .c. - PFD ,.... ':.,,,� o, I co gF ,�0 ,.., ................ .................. TEL ,; t :......__....... :_(WEST DAY LOT) _ I }_ a t r' MNNTENANCE FAO ITY Il 4 �� P�C ` N� rr 1 I 9� ��33 I �. '1,. 1 ,... °UPTM' f THE MARRIOTT..,�.\ c f5 i .,�.,! :A E`' ..-' „x' /.v� �. .. _..} _ __ 1.AREA:'- r���) /, `, (JL SPA/ % 1.4t„,4 ............ .. .-....:_.... r L .. � J, ................................. ............ _..� I EAST LpNSHEAD �,� ;3 1.- I ._..i= V�,ILY`O\,.,.r'"� PGERO� ( NFR LIONSHEAD VILLAGE E i _NORTH DAY LOT 5 trix ... j i _ AG s. PARIONG STRUCTURE � � `- ;�.1.1 'M I l-lO EASTBOUND 'J l-TO WESTBOUND co ni^ i I 0) I F--.,,,o I ,b ) I I FIGURE 16 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT NORTH DAY LOT Vail Resorts' I TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study I marlKimley Assoc-Hom Page 33 and iates,Inc.C:Im I I NTS os7ss�oot ILEGEND • O®FR-T-1-1 Area Key Intersection• I , XX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .Z17- = . I t 1., I I TENNIS COURT As SITE Op __ _ _ _ %5L.':HOTELEXPANSIONfr 1(WESTOAYW I / i FACIA y �J- ..J—,--4, t 7HE MARRion-- , o c E , i ,w 1 F tCOREAREA( 4 ' Q,O`' WEST t? tf:�f) {r vaL sv [LT. _ 1 ' AN. 7 F' , .\ysl k .. L'''''''- ' EAST ILIONSHEAD 0 I -1 ..-'._ ("'� 1 ` _ VPIL�LOi,.�r� Of�p0p9 , LANDMARKS 1 f,°E �k r R .... ^'T� NORTH DAY LOT;;i:-'_ aOpO 5 LIONSHEAD VILLAGE t Y I e�aama - PC's N" i - PARKING STRUCTURE ; A"� } .�f�D � i i I-70F TgOUND 0�n�\ I 1 WESTBOUND ���\ -TO WE � �0.,/ '1\y `L0 6 —0(0) �G t� F—47(56) F—�a1101 2��2j1 —a n. I 0(t) �, o 24121 2209) T 44(55)—� o o 0(0) r1 / E--47(56) 1. y 261261 1 0(0) X61301 44(56)_. t 1 FIGURE 17 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I TOTAL TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Kimley Hom Page 34 j Iir and Associates,Inc. 1 I P NTS 067867001 1. 1 NORTH LEGEND ® • Study Area Key Intersection ®aiI' `�p i IXX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 1 TENNIS COURT j SITE oP I/ ,::::::,,,,,-... --,,,,,:::::::- GORF op 0;4- i-H0TE::::: EXPANSION i=ai /W i i \ - ERS f ! !1 ,0 P4s CF / �•; I I MAINT RY NHCE FA CIL 4 5 N V�' - p( 0RSLE ., p ,,,,s THE MAR R \� .l T 1 NS n I ORE AREAL t ::vvE-14r T J 5 NL S �P I s i. ' r I EAST LIONSHEAD O s „...i ...,..-a---,,, T C ..� I 1 VNl Oi,�" ItsGs �N _._ F� NORTH DAV LOT,.._;.':.""' S EaOPp I I LIONSHEAD VILLAGE I I, -t_ i r , _ - O�(PO' PARKING STRUCTURE ■ I ._ .. ,r..i i_„; � ,I�\\y10\ \! I I- WESTBWND ! t? '.,ef \\ \ ; S /I-0 7FA STBOUND ryM 1. o. i ',CZ — o o X110(65) <-422(531) 4 j(15 d 3 259)� h o r �ag6 111 180(116) 514(575) —> o o o X145(120) CO °, E 442(476) �412M k--4 ■L O` co t. "' f, y t0,, I110(135) 40851 434(621) —> FIGURE 18 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT 2005 TOTAL POST DEVELOPMENT Vail Resorts' I PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Lionshead Redevelopment Impact Study con Kim►ey-Hom Page 35 I 11 \111 and Associates,Inc. 1 f NTS 067867001 LEGEND NO RTH Study Area Key Intersection ® IXX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes i I : t: '' I ;i TENNIS COURT.71 Q°'9F O i F i "2" "_ _ _-_ (WETE 1U 1:7 O)71..Fg:' /'T- i __ _" E FpLY E � _ MENANCA ` _ .'��9'09 �P C r T MRROT \ pI� �.. .-. _:: ORE AREA .w WEST .-f� ENZ ,, VNL SPRl r_ 4 t aL I EAST LpMSHEAD O S :.-�-=r^-• - �•• ppD _1_,,,,,, LgNDMARKw 4OD0..'E �pNtP tH ,•..."'.. ,N . NORTH DAY LOT E�ypPO -s00.0,0041 OJ LIONSHEAD VILLAGE i i--� i q l PO I PARKING STRUCTURE [ ;- t-; 0,534C \ JS j S / ` � ��� s TBOVND 4 I.I7.O 70 EWESTBWND I as ti° ,/ a I �-135(95) 450 l f 4--640(745) 3O(S51 a 11 y 0 ;n �51��51 �n/ 205(115) o^ ��16101 N I ( ) 700 855 X145(120) 1 �" <-685(720) 1G ��5l 1 l a 110(135) --a 6p0�6251 635(915) — I FIGURE 19 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT 2025 TOTAL POST DEVELOPMENT TrafVail Resorts'dy I PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Lionshead fiRec dImpact evelopmeStunt Page 36 i I E=,,,„,,n Kimley Hom and Associates,Inc. I 11 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSES I Kimley-Horn's analyses of traffic y y operations in the site vicinity were conducted to determine I potential capacity deficiencies in the 2005 and 2025 development horizons. These horizons were studied with and without the addition of Vail Resorts' Lionshead project Redevelopment ect traffic. IBackground traffic growth from other future Lionshead Redevelopment projects not associated with Vail Resorts is included in the analysis. The acknowledged source for determining overall I capacity is the current edition of the Highway Capacity Manual2. i l I Capacity analysis results are listed in terms of level of service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative term i describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street Iduring a particular time interval. It ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). The Town of Vail recommends LOS C or better as the measure of desirable level of Iservice and LOS D as acceptable level of service during the peak hours. The intersection operations for background (prior to the addition of project traffic) and total (with project traffic I added) traffic peak-hour conditions at key intersections were analyzed using the unsignalized 1 analysis methodologies found in the Highway Capacity Manual2 (HCM) using the Highway ICapacity Software (HCS 2000) program, Release 4.1. The following provides a discussion of the level of service results on an intersection-by-intersection basis (calculations in Appendix C). ILevel of service is shown for each of the key intersections using the existing intersection geometry as well as for each intersection with improved geometry. It is important to note that I the critical gaps were modified to demonstrate the needed gap acceptance differences created c by the installation of left turn acceleration lanes at the subject intersections. The critical gap for l left turns from the side streets was matched with those for the left turns in from the frontage road. These gaps would be similar since these both cross the eastbound traffic. This was done Ito most accurately model intersections with acceleration lanes. I I2 Transportation Research Board,Highway Capacity Manual,Special Report 209,Washington DC,2000. Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 37 I i 1 I South Frontage Road and Parking Structure Access IIt was found that the intersection of South Frontage Road with the parking structure access is expected to operate at a deficient level of service prior to the addition of project in 2005 with the 1 I existing intersection configuration. The northbound movement at this unsignalized intersection 1 is expected to operate at LOS F with extremely long delays during the afternoon peak hour in 1 2005 before the addition of project traffic. Based upon the results of the analysis and the expected magnitude of turning movements in both short term 2005 and long term 2025 Ihorizons, the northbound approach should be designated with separate left and right turn lanes. Sufficient pavement width is believed to exist for this improvement. A westbound left Iturn lane was also found to be required at this intersection in 2005 prior to project development. In addition, an eastbound right turn lane along South Frontage Road was found to be needed I (pre development) based on the State Highway Access Code for category F-R roadways by 2005. These turn lanes are expected to improve operations at this intersection by separating left Iand right turn traffic from the through movements. The shared center turn lane area would further improve operations by providing northbound left-turning vehicles an acceleration lane I t before entering the main stream of traffic along the frontage road. It is recommended that the 1 Town of Vail consider implementation of these turn lanes to improve the existing traffic Isituation at this intersection. IWith these improvements,the northbound approach is anticipated to operate at acceptable level of service during both morning and afternoon peak hours with or without the addition of Iproject traffic in 2005. For the 2025 horizon, it was found that an acceleration lane is recommended for northbound to eastbound right turning vehicles exiting the Parking Structure Iprior to the addition of project traffic. The Town of Vail and CDOT should consider this g improvement in the future as through volumes increase along South Frontage Road. Table 2 It P g g Iprovides the results of the level of service capacity analysis. I t I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 38 I I t . Table 2- South Frontage Road/Parking Structure Access LOS Results IWithout Project With Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ti I Delay ( c Delay Delay Delay se veh LOS se veh LOS se veh LOS se veh LOS Scenario / ) ( c/ ) ( c/ ) ( c/ ) 2005 Short Term 1 Existing Roadway Westbound Approach 9.4 A 9.3 A 9.7 A 9.5 A Northbound Approach 26.6 D 437.6 F 31.3 D 574.6 F I 2005 Short Term With Improvements ) Westbound Left 9.4 A 9.3 A 9.7 A 9.5 A I Northbound Left 10.5 B 11.4 B 10.7 B 11.6 B Northbound Right 10.8 B 20.2 C 11.2 B 23.3 C 2025 Long Term I Existing Roadway Westbound Approach 11.2 B 10.6 B 11.5 B 10.9 B Northbound Approach 121.9 F 1369 F 166.4 F 1643 F 2025 Long Term I With Improvements Westbound Left 11.2 B 10.6 B 11.5 B 10.9 B ',. Northbound Left 11.8 B 12.8 B 12.0 B 13.0 B I ISouth Frontage Road and East Lionshead Circle It was found that the intersection of South Frontage Road with East Lionshead Circle is expected to operate at a deficient level of service prior to the addition of project in 2005 with the existing intersection configuration. The northbound movement at this unsignalized intersection I g is expected to operate at LOS F with extremely long delays during the afternoon peak hour in 1 I 2005 before the addition of project traffic. Based upon the results of the analysis and the expected magnitude of turning movements in both short term 2005 and long term 2025 horizons, the northbound approach should be designated with separate left and right turn lanes. A westbound left turn lane was also found to be required at this intersection in 2005 prior to project development. In addition, an eastbound right turn lane along South Frontage Road was found to be needed (pre development) based on the State Highway Access Code for P g Y I 1 category F-R roadways by 2005. These turn lanes are expected to improve operations at this t: Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 39 I I Iintersection by separating left and right turn traffic from the through movements. The shared I center turn lane area would further improve operations by providing northbound left-turning vehicles an acceleration lane before entering the main stream of traffic along the frontage road. I It is recommended that the Town of Vail consider implementation of these turn lanes to improve the existing traffic situation at this intersection. With these improvements, the Inorthbound approach level of service improves to LOS B during the afternoon peak hour with or without the addition of project traffic in 2005. In 2025, the movements are expected to Icontinue to operate with acceptable level of service (operating at LOS C or better) with or without the addition of project traffic, given the existing improvements are constructed. Table 1 3 provides the results of the level of service capacity analysis. 1 Table 3-South Frontage Road/East Lionshead Circle LOS Results IWithout Project With Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour I Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Scenario (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) 2005 Short Term I Existing Roadway Westbound Approach 9.3 A 9.4 A 9.5 A 9.7 A Northbound Approach 38.7 E 105.5 F 50.8 F 163.3 F I 2005 Short Term With Improvements Westbound Left 9.3 A 9.4 A 9.5 A 9.7 A Northbound Left 12.8 B 15.1 C 13.1 B 15.8 C I Northbound Right 12.2 B 13.2 B 12.8 B 14.1 B 2025 Long Term Existing Roadway I Westbound Approach 10.6 B 10.8 B 10.9 B 11.1 B Northbound Approach 198.4 F 618.8 F 265.9 F 799.7 F 2025 Long Term IWith Improvements Westbound Left 10.6 B 10.8 B 10.9 B 11.1 B Northbound Left 14.7 B 19.4 C 15.2 C 20.5 C Northbound Right 16.0 C 18.1 C 17.0 C 19.7 C I 1 Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 40 I I ISouth Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (east portal) IThis unsignalized east portal intersection of the Frontage Road with West Lionshead Circle was found to operate with an acceptable level of service in the background condition of 2005. (' IHowever, a westbound left turn lane was found to be required at this intersection in 2005 prior to project development based upon State Highway Access Code requirements for category F-R Iroadways. It is anticipated that a two-way left turn lane is recommended to be installed that will provide a deceleration lane for westbound left turning vehicles turning onto West ILionshead Circle at this location as well as an acceleration lane for northbound left turning vehicles turning onto the Frontage Road. With this improvement, all movements are expected Ito operate acceptably with the addition of project traffic in the 2005 horizon year Prior to the addition of project traffic in 2025, separate northbound left and right turn lanes are anticipated Ito be needed to maintain acceptable level of service along West Lionshead Circle. Table 4 provides the level of service results at this intersection. 1 ITable 4-South Frontage Road/West Lionshead Circle (east portal) LOS Results Without Project With Proj IAM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay Delay Delay Delay LOS LOS LOS LOS I Scenario (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) 2005 Short Term Existing Roadway I Westbound Approach 8.8 A 8.8 A 9.0 A 9.0 A Northbound Approach 18.9 C 29.7 D 25.5 D 61.0 F 2005 Short Term With Improvements IWestbound Left 8.8 A 8.8 A 9.0 A 9.0 A Northbound Left/Right 14.7 B 15.8 C 16.0 C 17.9 C 2025 Long Term I Existing Roadway Westbound Approach 9.9 A 10.7 B 10.4 B 11.2 B Northbound Approach 62.3 F 304.0 F 142.8 F 613.3 F I 2025 Long Term With Improvements Westbound Left 9.9 A 10.7 B 10.4 B 11.2 B Northbound Left 13.2 B 17.6 C 14.5 B 20.6 C INorthbound Right 19.1 C 19.2 C 22.0 C 22.5 C I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 41 I I South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle (west portal) The northbound shared left turn and right turn movement at this west portal unsignalized intersection of the Frontage Road with West Lionshead Circle is expected to operate at Iunacceptable level of service in the future prior to the addition of project traffic in 2005. This is due to the northbound left turning vehicles having difficulty entering the South Frontage Road Idue to the high through volumes. The northbound approach is expected to benefit from a two- way left turn lane along the Frontage Road. This two-way left turn lane will allow vehicles to Ienter the Frontage Road more easily by having a designated lane to turn into before merging with through traffic. By 2025, the northbound approach would benefit from separate left and Iright turn lanes to serve project traffic. With these improvements, all movements are expected to operate acceptably in the near term and long term horizons. Table 5 provides the level of Iservice results at this intersection. ITable 5-South Frontage Road/West Lionshead Circle (west portal) LOS Results I Without Project With Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Scenario (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) 2005 Short Term Without Improvements I Westbound Approach 9.3 A 8.8 A 9.6 A 9.1 A 4, Northbound Approach 19.5 C 55.4 F 24.3 C 136.0 F 2005 Short Term I With Improvements Westbound Left 9.3 A 8.8 A 9.6 A 9.1 A Northbound Approach 10.9 B 13.4 B 11.8 B 15.5 C ' 2025 Long Term Without Improvements Westbound Approach 10.6 B 10.2 B 11.0 B 10.6 B Northbound Approach 36.7 E 443.8 F 60.6 F 797.0 F I2025 Long Term With Improvements Westbound Left 10.6 B 10.2 B 11.0 B 10.6 B 1 Northbound Approach 12.7 B 17.6 C 13.4 B 17.6 C Northbound Left N/A N/A 12.7 B 18.2 C Northbound Right N/A - N/A - 14.4 B 15.9 C I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 42 I I i I ISouth Frontage Road and Forest Road 1 Based upon the State Highway Access Code for category F-R roadways, an eastbound left turn lane is needed at this intersection prior to the addition of project traffic in 2005. With this Iimprovement, this intersection is expected to operate with acceptable level of service throughout the long term horizon with or without the addition of project traffic. Table 6 Iprovides the level of service results at this intersection. ITable 6- South Frontage Road/Forest Road LOS Results 1 Without Project With Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay Delay Delay I Scenario (sec/veh) LOS LOS LOS(sec/veh) (sec/veh) 2005 Long Term Without Improvements I Eastbound Approach 8.4 A 9.4 A 8.5 A 9.5 A Westbound Approach 9.1 A 8.7 A 9.2 A 8.8 A Northbound Approach 24.1 C 25.2 D 25.8 D 27.7 D I Southbound Approach 22.6 C 29.1 D 24.0 C 31.8 D 2005 Long Term With Improvements I Eastbound Left 8.4 A 9.4 A 8.5 A 9.5 A Westbound Left 9.1 A 8.7 A 9.2 A 8.8 A Northbound Approach 15.4 C 14.9 B 15.8 C 15.4 C Southbound Approach 14.4 B 16.0 C 14.8 B 16.6 C 1 2025 Long Term Without Improvements Eastbound Approach 9.1 A 10.5 B 9.2 A 10.6 B t I Westbound Approach 10.3 B 9.5 A 10.4 B A Northbound Approach 48.6 E 47.5 E 60.9 F 64.0 F Southbound Approach 45.9 E 59.3 F 21.0 F 78.6 F ' 2025 Long Term With Improvements Eastbound Left 9.1 A 10.5 B 9.2 A 10.6 B Westbound Left 10.3 B 9.5 A 10.4 B 9.6 A I Northbound Approach 20.2 C 18.6 C 21.4 C 20.2 C Southbound Approach 18.8 C 20.7 C 19.6 C 22.1 C I 1. I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ITraffic Impact Study Page 43 The HCS analysis results for total traffic are graphically depicted for the study intersections in Y �' p Y P Y 1 Figure 20 for the 2005 horizon and Figure 21 for the 2025 horizon. The intersection HCS and State Highway Access Code requirements resulted in the future intersection lanes and control recommendations as shown in Figures 22 and 23 for 2005 and 2025, respectively. In addition, these improvements to the South Frontage Road are schematically shown in Figures 24 and 25 for the long term horizon. The intersection analysis results and laneage improvements include traffic evaluation of total traffic including other future Lionshead Redevelopment projects not ' associated with Vail Resorts' per the Lionshead Master Plan. 1 Therefore,based upon the analysis and results from this study, it is important to recognize that the existing South Frontage Road is currently operating over capacity. Improvements identified within this report will greatly improve the operations of the South Frontage Road and Lionshead area intersections for both existing traffic and future traffic with the addition of all Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment projects. Overall, Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment projects add a small percentage of traffic to the area and do not determine the need for improvements beyond what is already needed today. However, Vail Resorts will participate in improvements along South Frontage Road per the Town of Vail's impact fee. The next step is to develop a phasing plan and determine the allocation of Vail Resorts' impact fee in developing these improvements. I I 1 Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 44 if#°. ... : .... . I .4\ --- ..•• '•: : • : , . I „ • I•..., I, : '., • : , . ....................., , • . ... .• . I..., , , , : , , I ,• ,.. .. I•• , ...,,,............. ct "; 0, , . . .. .. : . • •••• I; ".„. •••,., : , . 1..) ,•;.::%-:,,„ / .. I-- ',: : 4—,:..••' ; :I. : \ : . • . . „ „. , , ..............,................... • !_c 01 . ,• ' \\ , . , , . . . . ; -t \ cz! ., . . , . . ' ....... ........... . . .,,...........„.., •••• ..• 0 >• : •: ; ,II; III:, \ : \ • ; • : . . . . •RI" Sa., , . . • . : , . . Z CD II II' Il Ii ,.. •;„, . „ : • • • : . . , . . . • a .: . .• . ........, : • :• . , , k : ■ 1 . . .. .. .. . . . .. ••• .• . . , . . . . . 1 1 k '. .• . • .. . . : • ' i . '• . . • . .• i . : . . . t41.44 . 1: ..... • • .. . . . . • . . . : . ' .. . . : . '■ .. , ., .. . . • . '' 1 .... ...t.::::::::::::.:•••.•••• ' '." ."'..''A: ` • Ct Ct \ : • , .. MS ..........■ ' 't \ \ . • .. • , .: a.) :....t7" •.........; -•,,, : , . . . . . . . . . . , : . . . . . ,- E- • . c.n . „ . . . . . . . . . . . ,.. .. /• . I-.4, • • ' • • .• - • . • - . . . • , . . . . . . . . ,%, ... ''',.1............................,...... .... • • . . , . . , . 1-- : . ,.....: . , % •1 14. 11, * t • • . , . . • % . , ,• . ' • • . .1 0 - • • . . , • . . . . . ; . • :. . . . .. . • . . . • . - 1 0 ... . • • \ ' .. . . : : • 1 , . . . . . . ,• • , . . • , , . • - • .• : , : . . • , ; : : . . . . .• , . . . , • . . . • . , . . . : . . , . . . .• .. , • . . . , . . , . . • • . . • . . . . : - . . . . : . . . . . :• . .. , %. • . . : • • , . . . : . • . , .• , , . • :• . , • .....'''''''''''''''''''''''''' . , , . .• , I , I ' , , . . : . • • : ; ‘ , • : %., I . . . . . . . : : . . • : . . . . • . . : : : , • : . . . . . . . . .•• : ' , • . . . . . . .••' . ;; %•:, . , . , ; • • . . , .•• , ; „ . , . •• . , . . . , • : , : . . .• • . . . ,• „........ I ; : . . , :• 1 • , :• . . • . .. • : . . • • . . . . . . ........ : : , •,, I : : , : .•• i.,%,.% I\:. .,,:,..% „,,, . : , • • : . : . • : . . , .. : : • • . • : , , . : . . . ; . • . ... , • • : .. . . . :„.... . : . ... :• . . : ,• • : : : ••••••••"•% : ...„....„ ... : • i , • I • . . I"'" r.1 . . ..• . . . „ „ I 1 • • ',..\ 1 • ...,..,.......,.,.. . ,.........: • : , , ••., : •..,. 4 t . ' . , , • ,...„,.,.... , . ....................„ • . , : ••,.............. \ \.„ ,.. .., . ! • '- . . • . •, .. . . . . i , .. :: . . ,•• , : . ... • .., ,,,,, . :i ......... , • . 't ... . . . : • : , ,• . , . :• • . : ''' '''„. i .•• : .• • ..........., . , . . -... • ................... , ... : . . . .. : .• , . ,,,... • : .....,......, ; . . ,,• '•,„.. i 'I 0 •. , .... ...........................,. • • ' . • i‘, i : . I .• : , .•• I . , • , \ : . , , Q) . ‘: : . . . ; , . . : : , ill , „.../ \ ••• , .• : . •. \ •••• : • : , •, \ , 1 I ("Q t I ..• : : -1; 1' ; ; ; . • I I CI) I 1 1; .•:: t \ . : . . I . : . . 1 E • . . \ \ . . • - \ , , : 0 ‘1 N. 1 ' \ \ 1 • 1 I S.■ : r'l ..: i 1 1 . ', 1 ..--• ] . . . . . . . , . . • . . . . . . . , izu • : : ,.... , 1 c :• : . , = ! , ..• . ..,-. 1 1 = • : : . c...) ': .. 1 o ..• : ) ! 1 i . . :• , , ..c., • / ! I : : , • • -i—, . :• • i : , (r) • . . :• • , i . • 1 ; I 0") : : :• .•• : : I t , I I • C I ; t • I I \ . , \ t , -.-- : • : .•• • • '. \ t i 5,-. ; t . : : : CO : : , . . • . : : \ ; • I 0- ; : , . : •. , • .• : . : . :: :• • . : , . , • • , : : .•• \ \ Z • • : : : .: . . / : , . : : 0 • . : , . . . . . . • :: . • : t t , , . . : , • I . ; . .• 0 . . t I ; ; . . : . . i I ; . , ; : ; , . t . • . W ; . !t•••;:::, i . . 4 I , , . . , %••••":r l"---: , : : , , Cr) . . • ,• . : • • . . : : • Z ! :Fs', , . . : \•-, ; • • , . : , • . CE . : , J . U-I 1 1 '\ ; • : . ,• •.: : ........., • ! : ',. :\ , , • I- . : . . . , (.0 i . ',..... ,•• . . , . . : „ ! . .' : :• . • : < i ,...., . . • ; •••: : . • : / , sv„........., :.......................„..............................., : . • .., .:1 : IE zi : ,J ...:.......' ,...., ,./1 / UJ : . :: . / : :•.' .. „ LU ,.,,„„,,,,,,.,....„---•„„ , . : . : "•,.../1 / . . . • • 2 g , . . •.>... . , .... \ : . i • . : . : : . . . . .. . ! I , i • :: Cl- Cn . . . 1 ' .....,. : • • : . . . . . i . . 0 LI-I . : . ..... i ! \•, ...':.''''•,. ; : : , • • . . .. . . • . : 1 : .. . ' , ,., • . • % • . . ' : : . i , 4 • . . : . . . 11.''11.........• \ , i : 1 I . . . , . : \ \ • ., ( i : • : • : J LU H. \ • „ , • 1 I I I . • • • > EL , . . , : . , • • . : LJLJ w . : • 1, l : . . : . . . . . .. . , . .. ! , , • ,. . . . . . • . , . . . . : . \ , • ,,/ i''',„ , ::I / It , : . . . . . . . : ; • . . . ,: . • . , . ,..i'l: ./..........- '..%1'...:.! . . , . . . . , : • . , . . . . : . , , W Z , .• f i : . • : , . . • . • .• ,,/:!•::,••:,,, % '...,',.,., " • . . % ; ; • : : / . • . . , . • . . , . . 0 0 4 , • • , . • • . . . , • . . ' s . . . ; . , , :i : : : • . . . , . : , . ,,,:: „„: . . • Cl c • . . W 1/...., • : „ . . „ : •. , . i < cti . 1 • . . . . • : . . . , . . . . . • / / / . . • • : : . . OI") 0 a.) ,••.. • : • , , , . E a) . . . i',.. : , i / , : . . . — , , . , • z : . , . , .• , „. , . . i .• . . .. . . : . .. . . ......... , . . . .. • , . .... 0 11-1 >., cp .• • i I . . . , . „ . . ....1 ; : : I ' ! 'f • r r -0 < E , , co H 2 CO I ... , : , H Z :2 i • .. . 0 . c„, CO LL II I-0 LIJ 111 • 2 Z/ 1 C5 7‹ 0 LL > U) \*.., 1 c \ . , . • 4\ \\\ \ • . '. . • s',.. \,, . , \ .,. • . -R 19 -0 tr-) • ; ; \ \ , , • , • s I 124 ci 15 A., , , \ \ , • \ , \ \ \ \ .E •,,t— sa, \ 41 E " ...L) „ , , ,.. \ ...... ,,,,,, .., \ e .., -,.... ,..... N . \ \ \ ... va 'Cl.0 \., „ \•• '',.,:, , \\,,, s■ ,,„,„...„.,„„ \ `, \, 0 11 '•,. ,,,,, \ `,,, , , `,..„....... .• .. , . , •. ',, -------..._,) \ \ \ \ \ .., \ \ \ \ \ \ • \ \ f! 1. \ \ • i , \ \ \ \ -1,.. -i•-+ 0 . .1 1 .'” ,,.. : -...„, . , • , , , . , . : (/),--I ,., \ • .. \ \ CD i , „ . . • • . :i mn • • •• • .: ' ...... , , , . • \ \ 0 , • , , , ) , \ , , .•• . r‘l...., ....., , . t.,------•,:.„„„,..,.,.,., i \ „ „ , • I . , \ 1 , . \ \ \ \ ; , \ \ , .. :.........,,, ; , \ \ . . ), \ . . \ ; \ \ \ \ \ • , ..._ \„- ,, —.\ \ . , / --- \ \ . , :...,.:,...:::-..:'.:..........,..,. i '; \ \ -" ''' ,,,' \ \ \ \; \ \ \ ----• \ \ , \ \ • \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \i \\ .... ., .11.i t•■ \ ‘ ,-' \ •,,, , ; , , , • , 3",t ,,• ; t, i: i ,,,,•••' : I 1 I i t I \ ' ,-• ,,- '' \ \ • , . . It' .-"' • \ : t , r" \ \ ... . • • - -,..,, t, •• • • t / / \ , „,., . / / . ; \Vet. \ ''', • •. • , . t t .„, tz ,. \ , • tt ti l'' ......., , . , ...,.....-1 \C..1\ t„....„ ', \ 15) \ • ', 0 \ t•r-; \ \ , ,......„.....,,\ • li 0 •,•;. . ''...............,;•) •.. • , , • • , . , : \ 1. 0 i . „ •,,,... • • ,, : . . . , : • •. . , : : ‘...../"" / : • , ,• .•,• , t ... , r . • \ , . . . . . „ t”. / ... ,.. - : 1 ............................. . • ,..,,,',7/ 1, 0 ‘, \ , • ......,„ ,,..., ,, . 7 ..• .......... , :_.4 \ s, . . , . . • \ , . . \ \...,,,,,,,,- ,.... \ \ \ , \ 1. , , , 1.- • \ \ \ . , ,..., ... . \ -, •, \ \ \ , , . 1 i 1 \ , i \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 , ) ‘, , ,. ,/i \ •,. ,. , ` \, \ \ , ,' .., , s , , . 6 : ., . . ', i -"' 1 1 1 L'`., • \ '. / i : • 4 •. '', . . ,.. : : ..• i .• • „ ( , I ! . . . ;\ . i . .• . . : . . • . . : .- . , . . , : i .......'' i \ s , •: -. .• ; ■ i i . . • . : 11 . . i • . . • ' . ' ' • I c::::::::::::::::, :::::::..5 :.., / i • • • . . . 1 . . t.; ,,,,,.s i ..• . • / I " 11 i..' ' \ \'''‘\ • , , • ! 1 1 1 A , '1, t „, , I . ! : .• • ..:: i [..i .1. .•• . .1 \ \.,...:,..........i., ....,,,..... . ; . . : . . .• , i, i i \\ 1 . • t , H \ \ f t , ( , • ',..../. '1 1:,.• ''.•1 \ \ \ ' '"..1 1 . , Z • , ‘ j \''••••.....' :.:. '.--.‹, , CE ' . \ I • . 1 . .,! /., :. 1 I.•.- ' !. \'',, . . • • !---1 \ I : . \ ! ! 1 C., 1.-. !! : . / I . . : . 1 : \ . . . , , • , .., , ■ !. . ,.. , . „....., 1 .!. :... ' •' ..:............... \ Cn • ! / .// i t , \ ! 3} ! W : t : : ,-,=_,•. / / : i , : t \ ..... ;.: :•1 , ../„/` • i ! _C 0 ' ,...„ .• , , H I 1 ! ', \ ' t—I ' : :, ,, . , • . : : • 0 >. ' : : : ' ' Z ' 1 1 W i Z RI I.• : : ::. \ \ 2 (5 • , 1 1 i • • 0 • .,, , .• , ,1 o_ cn • ..........., ........... 0 w ” . . ,•.:. 1 , . : ......- , .: : I 1 „.., • , ,,,,.. , ,„ , , . . . , ,.. , ,. 1. •:•: _1 a „ . , • . : . • • LLJ H. , CO . : • .......................... . . . ,.,,.... , r'' i : \' ! > CL (1) ,.......e,,,, 1 i i I ! , . &■ / . t.i ,....,........., ...,.........■ , <: (/ ................n . , a 0 ,-- W Z \ ,...-,:.... \ , 4 CC 0 —101— / , t • , 0 C.) \ s"',, ` ,.., .\ • : . .. ./ < Li . . . \ I It L- • ; • W ° c \ "\\„ ,,, : • . .• . I , , — ‘,.\ - „-, , • , : . . : .• : . . . . . . . .. (I) 0 , 1%) • • \\ • • : ---, ,,.,_-----......... ..• • • • . \\ ..,.. "5 -,. • . •.•. \ . . . ..•. • • • .. , • . [[ [ 1 [ 0 W , \ • [, i 0 \ \ \ -, \ 1, [7)I 1 1 i , ‘ 3 —, 0 a) < ■ —I— < 2 1 \ -.• \\ i 1 1 ,, 1 Y co , . HL 1, H Z Ir CC 0 ' 1 / Lo 0 cc .....• --- C\I co 1 1 ra... 111 • • . • L 1 . • -■- .: I i ' 1 '1 I i Ili i • :• • ; I , 1 i . • 7 ,. i D —I D LI • , . . • : • . 1 i • .. 7:0 0 - -.. \.... .' •.• i■ ■I ■11 i■I ...11 .... ■11 , ■ f 1 1 1 .... ... . . : U— > CO ..1 i _.....11■11111/111 IN . r NTS 067867001 ILEGEND N ®®RTH • Study Area Key Intersection ® ... I XX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Level of Service t 1 I. I "i TENNIS COURT i Q STE RF GQc HOTEL DAPANS10N :' (WEST Lort .............. ...........E .. DAY ANTLERS _ i _ - ....,._.._: Cr ANT :. i ." .s ./// I _ } M NTENAHGE FAGLITY ,�,yy Is___ �� r.'''SUPT"* 1 THE MARRIan > CIRCA L q*... ..IEAREA� ` rF' t WEST - %�j 1 i Q°' _ .. _z E NZ�AN •p i µ - T EAST LpNSHED C 3' �1 t.•--t - V LE O C i".�,.,;r� PG iµ 0 9 p F. r (LANDMPoC.j F yp 1 77 NOryH ,..,:e,,9,..3..2.--f.:,. �� ? LIONSHEAD VILLAGE 1 !.-_ ! zEggigRi. PARKING STRUCTURE ._.z (..i r i•1 _.._.. i_ ZN eO0 O >1 A(A) 1-70 EASTBGUND I1.70 WESTBOUND A(A)�. B(c) I B( B(B) V r yi I A(A)A B(C) B(B)I A(A IA(A)—I I FIGURE 20 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT 2005 LEVEL OF SERVICE Vail Resorts' I TOTAL POST DEVELOPMENT Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Kimley-Hom Page 45 I /01111 n and Associates,Inc. L I I 1 NTS 067867001 LEGEND NORTH • Study Area Key Intersection VP I , XX(XX) AM(PM)Peak Hour Level of Service I TENNIS COURT ' SITE [ / 9, Fj-. PLO ORF P� =-__ .---_... _ _ _ EXPANSION �,.._.......—...._,.....__� i__- 'e ..._:......_..:.._;..._......___..._....._.(WEST DAY LOT) ::3:_:::: i 1 a ' i�} j t a _ IM NTENANCE 7cus Y I I ∎� x-' Pa�' I MARRIOTT.'\\ csccl-E H,9- THE 104,9-- �M1 S`"'^ ' ORE AREAL a�Q.'. WEST i, , r { LT EAST LIONSHEAD 1 I F .,--- .._.._............._...___..._._ 01, I i_ r S:,ANDMARKy� V�OD�}t.^E �V���Otit PG�POPO 5� �p ,...._...._.v INPD NORTH DAY LOT ,, . CEP t' LIONSHEAD VILLAGE i t I t[ i _- pG iI PARKING STRUCTURE -.....3 .::t_i CNFO� i 70 EASTb�� I ""ESTBUUND V B(A)),---\ 1 )� B(B) B(C) B(C) I 'J C(C)) B(C)) 1 B(B)-1 B(B) B(B( IC(C)) i ) B(B) I —, I II FIGURE 21 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT 2025 LEVEL OF SERVICE Vail Resorts' I Lionshead Redevelopment TOTAL POST DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Kimley Hom Page 46 J ....I Em I =rI and Associates,Inc. I C IN NTS 067867001 I LEGEND NORTH • Study Area Key Intersection _.Z. I 1 Improvement Needed Pre Development 2 Improvement Needed Post Development I TENNIS COURT SITE / O,p :, T caR4, P�Q. c ....................................... ...... ...m. . S F .:. (WT ALOT) NjT/ I t t.t PO pa, _- ",.r __ O � N f ANE FA7'1 __._ _ . TORE AREA WEST p.." ,4 p I EAST LIONSHEAD C ; '. ...._ ) FLO� O { UWDMARK E jr0 .. NORTH DAY LOT::`>% :' FR o�N LIONSHEAD VILLAGE r xi pGO' Oj9 i PARKING STRUCTURE M 17D EASTBOUND 70 WESTBOUND 1 ` I 1 3 1 --) el I —� JL ' VP , t I 1 _)/ IF _____ FIGURE 22 I VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDED 2005 SHORT TERM Vail Resorts' I Lionshead Redevelopment INTERSECTION LANES AND CONTROL Traffic Impact Study IIII Kimley-Hom Page 47 J I 4141 C2 II.r1 and Associates,Inc. E NTS 067867001 I LEGEND NORTH • Study Area Key Intersection Ei.ZP"I , I 1 Improvement Needed Pre Development 2 Improvement Needed Post Development I <'TENNIS COURT r'r:- ,� ^,\ SITE ,' GP i VIP ,`t I GGRP ?��� G _':!`''HOTEL EXPANSION:'_."% -�,.---- i -.. _. (VIEST DAY LOT) ['.._....: ,: ::: i j _ ANTLERS '' .M._ 1 t .r j -I t / E PACILRV .'MAMTENANC $ I �O PGce r kH Q7 ,+--_.,' s. .f U� T{E MRRKIR i\> CIR�I L'.. ...-.7 �OOREA7E-1 '—e-j i�_.,.WEST ram'',-:,-4,-, r k/).' i ✓ EAST LIGNSHEAD .;-.i ............._...... �lF. a 1... 1 LANDMARK,j E •pNtP WEST NFP I ,`__. .N BC AV LOT - 5 GP9 I LWNSHEAD VILLAGE ? } y NORTH D PARKING STRUCTURE ': . .._. .. , ...._; -.... Fµ0 GlIT . i EASTBOUND I-TO WESTBOUND O CD 1 J 1 1 22>� Accel / J J �Ilivr) ' 1 1 _, I FIGURE 23 VAIL RESORTS' LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDED 2025 LONG TERM Vail Resorts' I INTERSECTION LANES AND CONTROL Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 48 j I Kimley Horn c:ion and Associates Inc. I I6.0 CONCLUSIONS IBased on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Vail Resorts ILionshead Redevelopment will be successfully incorporated into the future traffic operations with the planned Frontage Road improvements. The proposed project development and Iexpected traffic volumes resulted in the following conclusions: I P g • The expected net increase in vehicular traffic for the identified Vail Resorts Lionshead redevelopment combined is 167 morning and 207 afternoon peak hour trips. I • Near Term Improvements Needed Today without Vail Resorts' Projects: 1 o Separate northbound left and right turn lanes at the intersection of the Parking Structure with South Frontage Road 1 o Dedicated westbound left turn lane at the intersection of the Parking Structure with South Frontage Road 1 o Dedicated eastbound right turn lane at the intersection of the Parking Structure with South Frontage Road (per CDOT State Highway IAccess Code) o Separate northbound left and right turn lanes at the intersection of IEast Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road o Dedicated westbound left turn lane at the intersection of East ILionshead Circle with South Frontage Road o Dedicated eastbound right turn lane at the intersection of East 1> ILionshead Circle with South Frontage Road (per CDOT State Highway Access Code) f' 1 o Dedicated westbound left turn lane at both east and west portal intersections of West Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road Io Dedicated eastbound right turn lane at the west portal intersection of West Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road (per CDOT State I Highway Access Code) I i Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Stud I p Study Page 51 I F I I 1 o Dedicated a t e s bound and westbound left turn lanes at the intersection of Forest Road with South Frontage Road I • Near Term(2005) Improvements Needed With All Vail Resorts' Projects: o No additional near term improvements needed as a result of adding project traffic I • Long Term(2025) Improvements Needed Without Vail Resorts' Projects: o Dedicated eastbound right turn lane at the east portal intersection of IWest Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road (per CDOT State Highway Access Code) Io Separate northbound left and right turn lanes at the west portal intersection of West Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road Io Acceleration lane for northbound to eastbound right turning vehicles exiting the Parking Structure at the South Frontage Road • Long Term(2025) Improvements Needed with All Vail Resorts' Projects: Io Separate northbound left and right turn lanes at the west portal intersection of West Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road I • No right turn acceleration lanes along the South Frontage Road are necessary due to the 1 25-mile per hour speed limit of the roadway, per CDOT State Highway Access Code. 1 I However as previously identified,in the long term 2025 horizon a right turn acceleration Ilane would benefit northbound to eastbound right turning vehicles exiting the parking structure. It is recommended that the Town of Vail monitor volumes at this intersection i Iin the future to determine if and when this improvement may provide benefit to intersection operations. IF • Left turn deceleration lanes with storage plus taper length (7.5:1) should be provided at Ilocations with a projected left turn peak hour vehicle volume movement greater than 25 t f Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment w` ITraffic Impact Study Page 52 @I B{ I I I I 111 vehicles T eludes per hour per the CDOT State Highway Access Code. Based upon expected Itraffic volumes these left turn lanes were found to be warranted at the South Frontage Road intersections with the Lionshead Parking Structure access, East Lionshead Circle, Ieast portal of West Lionshead Circle, west portal of West Lionshead Circle, and Forest Road. It is understood that the Town of Vail has planned that South Frontage Road be Idesigned and constructed with an auxiliary continuous bi-directional center left turn lane at and through the study area. This center turn lane would provide dedicated left c_ Iturn deceleration and storage lanes at the key intersections to separate left turn vehicles from the through movements. In addition, this shared center turn lane may further Iimprove operations of the intersections by providing northbound (and southbound at Forest Road/Maintenance site intersection) left-turning vehicles a refuge or accelerate j t I zone before entering the main stream of traffic along the frontage road. t I • Ri g ht turn deceleration lanes with storage length plus taper length should be provided tf at locations with a projected right turn peak hour vehicle volume movement greater Ithan 50 v i 1 es pe r hour pe r the CDOT State Highway Access Code. Therefore, right turn lanes are expected for the eastbound approaches at the Parking Structure entrance I I East Lionshead Circle, and the west portal of West Lionshead Circle. These right turn I deceleration lanes should be constructed based upon the recommended storage length I Iplus the 7.5 to 1 taper. This results in a right turn lane of 150 feet at the Parking Structure access and 250 feet at the west portal intersection of West Lionshead Circle. 1 I t Therefore,based upon the analysis and results from this study, it is important to recognize that Ithe existing South Frontage Road is currently operating over capacity. Improvements identified within this report will greatly improve the operations of the South Frontage Road and ILionshead area intersections for both existing traffic and future traffic with the addition of all Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment projects. Overall, Vail Resorts' Lionshead 1 IRedevelopment projects add a small percentage of traffic to the area and do not determine the need for improvements beyond what is already needed today. However, Vail Resorts will I participate in improvements along South Frontage Road per the Town of Vail's impact fee. The 1 I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 53 I 1 1 next step is to develop a phasing plan and determine the allocation of Vail Resorts' impact fee in developing these improvements. 1 i i 1 1 g 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Page 54 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 APPENDICES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study 1 1 1 I APPENDIX A Peak Hour Volume Count Sheets and ' Calculation Worksheets 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I ' Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street I Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : FOREST&FRONTAGEAM Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 IGroups Printed-1-Unshifted Page No : 1 FOREST RD FRONTAGE FOREST RD FRONTAGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int.Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 32 0 1 0 5 0 51 4 93 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 2 0 45 4 84 I 08:30 AM 0 0 0 3 34 0 3 0 0 0 41 3 84 08:45 AM 0 0 0 2 42 0 1 0 3 0 52 5 105 Total 0 0 0 5 141 0 5 0 10 0 189 16 366 I 09:00 AM 0 0 0 1 45 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 110 09:15 AM 0 0 0 1 57 0 2 0 2 0 62 2 126 09:30 AM 0 0 0 4 51 0 2 0 1 0 68 4 130 09:45 AM 0 0 0 2 62 0 1 0 1 0 67 1 134 I Total 0 0 0 8 215 0 5 0 4 0 261 7 500 10:00 AM 0 0 0 1 54 0 3 0 1 0 71 2 132 10:15 AM 0 0 0 1 52 0 2 0 2 0 72 3 132 10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 79 0 6 0 2 0 97 0 184 I 10:45 AM 0 0 0 1 55 0 3 0 1 0 62 2 124 Total 0 0 0 3 240 0 14 0 6 0 302 7 572 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 49 0 4 0 3 0 70 4 130 I 11:15 AM 0 0 0 3 57 0 9 0 5 0 73 2 149 Grand Total 0 0 0 19 702 0 37 0 28 0 895 36 1717 Apprch% 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 97.4 0.0 56.9 0.0 43.1 0.0 96.1 3.9 Total% 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 40.9 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.6 0.0 52.1 2.1 I FOREST RD Out In Total I of l of l of 1 I 1 01 01 01 Right Thru Lett � hr1 '-f I I _o _ _ _ris ♦ *I Iw = - North - r? c 0' .c z - -► 7/5/02 8:00:00 AM 4-= --4 3 o - -f- 7/5/02 11:15:00 AM 2 2 u..5 is CD M O-1 1-Unshlfted io _ m O� ��� Z - 4.- I I 1 r Left Thru Right 371 01 28� 1 I 1 1 551 ( 651 1 120 Out In Total FOREST RD IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street I Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : FOREST&FRONTAGEAM Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 IPage No : 2 FOREST RD FRONTAGE FOREST RD FRONTAGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start Time Left Thru Right Total Total APP' Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right Total APP' Left Thru Right �P Int. Total Total Peak Hour From 08:00 AM to 11:15 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 10:30 AM I Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 4 240 0 244 22 0 11 33 0 302 8 310 587 1.6 98.4 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 97.4 2.6 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 79 6 0 2 8 0 97 0 97 184 Volume I Peak Factor 0.798 High Int. 7:45:00 AM 10:30 AM 11:15 AM 10:30 AM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 79 9 0 5 14 0 97 0 97 Peak Factor 0.772 0.589 0.799 IFOREST RD Out In Total 1 of l 01 I 01 I 1 I 1 01 of 101 R' ht Th1 ru LeL,ft 4� I I w o'___t North `4, °'F. () o — c _ M Z M— M —• 7/5/02 10:30:00 AM 4--2r. —r3 Fi II O — 7/5/02 11:15:00 AM o— a D LL a0" - - l7 1.Unshifted rm m 0-O N –� `�Y a A N m. V- I I I Left T r Rihtth I 221 01 111 I I 121 1 331 I 451 Out In Total FOREST RD I I I IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street I Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : FOREST&FRONTAGEPM Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 I Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted FOREST FONTAGE RD FOREST FONTAGE RD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int.Total Factor 1.0. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 03:00 PM 0 0 0 1 91 0 4 0 2 0 85 2 185 03:15 PM 0 0 0 3 111 0 5 0 2 0 77 6 204 I 03:30 PM 0 0 0 3 81 0 7 0 4 0 64 2 161 208 03:45 PM 0 0 0 4 93 0 4 0 4 0 99 4 Total 0 0 0 11 376 0 20 0 12 0 325 14 758 I 04:00 PM 0 0 0 5 106 0 6 0 4 0 59 6 186 04:15 PM 0 0 0 1 83 0 7 0 3 0 82 4 180 04:30 PM 0 0 0 6 99 0 2 0 4 0 93 2 206 04:45 PM 0 0 0 2 112 0 5 0 3 0 73 2 197 Total 05:00 PM 0 0 0 14 400 0 20 0 14 0 307 14 769 0 0 0 4 116 0 3 0 3 0 85 0 211 05:15 PM 0 0 0 4 94 0 3 0 5 0 75 8 189 I Grand Total 0 0 0 33 986 0 46 0 34 0 792 36 1927 Apprch% 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 96.8 0.0 57.5 0.0 42.5 0.0 95.7 4.3 Total% 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 51.2 0.0 2.4 0.0 1.8 0.0 41.1 1.9 FOREST I Out In Total I of l of l 01 I 1 01 01 01 Right Thru Left I fI 1 I ~ o I N o 1_1' �-z. - °0 _I North -0 o O - O c - t -►is 1"-Z _ 7/5/02 3:00:00 PM 7/5/02 5:15:00 PM - - Z 4- �m -o g D 2 g m m O O - Unshifted •-a - ,I I 1 Left Thru Right X461 of 134I 111 I 69� 1 801 I 1491 Out In Total FOREST I IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street I Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : FOREST&FRONTAGEPM Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 IPage No : 2 FOREST FONTAGE RD FOREST FONTAGE RD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start lime Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right otPal Left Thru Right tPal Left Thru Right Toil Total Peak Hour From 03:00 PM to 05:15 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:30 PM I Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 16 421 0 437 13 0 15 28 0 326 12 338 803 3.7 96.3 0.0 46.4 0.0 53.6 0.0 96.4 3.6 05:00 0 0 0 0 4 116 0 120 3 0 3 6 0 85 0 85 211 Volume I Peak Factor 0.951 High Int. 2:45:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 04:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 4 116 0 120 5 0 3 8 0 93 2 95 Peak Factor 0.910 0.875 0.889 IFOREST Out In Total I 01 01 01 I 01 01 101 Right Thru Lel ft I I I —_ ~_ o�� I t jO North ` m 0 o c Q—M— Mr-� 7/5/02 4:30:00 PM '-7A -Aj D I Z — 1-- u O r.1„_4, 7/5/02 5:15:00 PM Unshifted 2 v .O x� g 0 I I li T r• ' Left Thru Right 131 01 15� I I I 1 1 281 1 281 1 56! Out In Total FOREST I I IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street I Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : WLION&FRONTAGEAM Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 IGroups Printed-1-Unshifted Pa g e No : 1 W LIONHEAD FRONTAGE W LIONHEAD FRONTAGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start lime Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int.Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 5 23 0 11 0 9 0 49 4 101 08:15 AM 0 0 0 6 35 0 10 0 7 0 40 3 101 I 08:30 AM 0 0 0 2 38 0 7 0 14 0 34 5 100 08:45 AM 0 0 0 14 34 0 4 0 12 0 43 5 112 Total 0 0 0 27 130 0 32 0 42 0 166 17 414 I 09:00 AM 0 0 0 10 40 0 8 0 10 0 62 4 134 09:15 AM 0 0 0 12 49 0 7 0 12 0 60 2 142 09:30 AM 0 0 0 i 1 52 0 5 0 1 i 0 69 1 149 09:45 AM 0 0 0 8 54 0 8 0 10 0 65 5 150 I Total 0 0 0 41 195 0 28 0 43 0 256 12 4 575 10:00 AM 0 0 0 4 51 0 5 0 14 0 66 144 10:15 AM 0 0 0 7 51 0 5 0 14 0 75 3 155 10:30 AM 0 0 0 2 62 0 4 0 8 0 80 10 166 133 I 10:45 AM 0 0 0 5 46 0 4 0 15 0 58 5 Total 0 0 0 18 210 0 18 0 51 0 279 22 598 11:00 AM 0 0 0 6 47 0 6 0 11 0 61 5 136 I 11:15 AM 0 0 0 4 58 0 4 0 10 0 74 2 152 Grand Total 0 0 0 96 640 0 88 0 157 0 836 58 1875 Apprch% 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 0.0 35.9 0.0 64.1 0.0 93.5 6.5 Total% 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 34.1 0.0 4.7 0.0 8.4 0.0 44.6 3.1 I W LIONHEAD Out Total OI I In O I 1 01 1 1 I I 101 01 101 R' ht Thru Left I I N w --J North o- w ri C7 �i co O Z °D- 2 t-• 7/5/02 8:00:00 AM 4-?co --A' O - _~ 7/5/02 11:15:00 AM 2 0 o D LL - � - N - .9-1 1-Unshifed m _ N 0 P.- t0 I I ', 1 r Left Thru Right I 881 01 1571 1541 1 2451 1 3991 II Out In Total W LIONHEAD IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street I Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : WLION&FRONTAGEAM Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 IPage No : 2 W LIONHEAD FRONTAGE W LIONHEAD FRONTAGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound ill Start Time Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right pp' Left Thru Right App. Int. tal Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 08:00 AM to 11:15 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 09:45 AM I Volume 0 0 0 0 21 218 0 239 22 0 46 68 0 286 22 308 615 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 91.2 0.0 32.4 0.0 67.6 0.0 92.9 7.1 10:30 0 0 0 0 2 62 0 64 4 0 8 12 0 80 10 90 166 Volume I Peak Factor 0.926 High Int. 7:45:00 AM 10:30 AM 10:00 AM 10:30 AM Volume 0 0 0 0 2 62 0 64 5 0 14 19 0 80 10 90 Peak Factor 0.934 0.895 0.856 IW LIONHEAD Out In Total 1 01 1 01 [ 01 I 1 I 1 of 01 1 0] Right Thru Left I I 1 o� - - S. O mJ _ N w — North T--KKKfCCC� C9 m — o .— X ~ CM or.c 7/5/029:45:00 AM 4-7N —M5? Z - — re _I- li- 7/5/02 10:30:00 AM 2 0o o N« ON N�� 1-Unshifted -r4 j— im I I4, 1 r Left Thru Right I 221 01 461 1 1 1 I I 431 I 681 I 1111 Out In Total W LIONHEAD I I i IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street I Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : WLION&FRONTAGEPM Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 Page No : 1 W LIONHEAD FRONTAGE W LIONHEAD FRONTAGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right, Int.Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 03:00 PM 0 0 0 16 79 0 2 0 13 0 75 5 190 03:15 PM 0 0 0 7 98 0 6 0 14 0 73 3 201 03:30 PM 0 0 0 15 96 0 5 0 7 0 64 4 191 I 03:45 PM 0 0 0 13 97 0 4 0 16 0 98 4 232 Total 0 0 0 51 370 0 17 0 50 0 310 16; 814 04:00 PM 0 0 0 9 104 0 4 0 9 0 62 3 191 213 I 04:15 PM 0 0 0 13 89 0 5 0 17 0 87 2 04:30 PM 0 0 0 9 95 0 8 0 20 0 96 1 229 04:45 PM 0 0 0 5 106 0 7 0 18 0 73 5 214 Total 05:00 PM 0 0 0 36 394 0 24 0 64 0 318 11 847 0 0 0 4 112 0 3 0 20 0 83 1 223 05:15 PM 0 0 0 3 87 0 5 0 23 0 81 4 203 Grand Total 0 0 0 94 963 0 49 0 157 0 792 32 2087 I Apprch% 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 91.1 0.0 23.8 0.0 76.2 0.0 96.1 3.9 Total% 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 46.1 0.0 2.3 0.0 7.5 0.0 37.9 1.5 W LIONHEAD Out Total 0 1 I In 0 1 1 1 1 I 1 01 01 01 Right Thru Left I I M _ O� -o ,_ I �� - ro0 w - North o A -n I N- N O Z c t-► 7/5/02 3:00:00 PM 1--m s -06F, O 7/5/02 5:15:00 PM 2 to 4 D LL - a.- _ m I0 -`r' Unshifted .V">a N o I I 41 T r Left Thru Right ¢g¢ 401 01 1571 II I 1 1261 1 2061 1 3321 Out In Total W LIONHEAD I IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : WLION&FRONTAGEPM I Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 IPage No : 2 W LIONHEAD FRONTAGE W LIONHEAD FRONTAGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start lime Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 03:00 PM to 05:15 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:15 PM I Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 31 402 0 433 23 0 75 98 0 339 9 348 879 7.2 92.8 0.0 23.5 0.0 76.5 0.0 97.4 2.6 04:30 0 0 0 0 9 95 0 104 8 0 20 28 0 96 1 97 229 Volume I Peak Factor 0.960 High Int. 2:45:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 4 112 0 116 8 0 20 28 0 96 1 97 Peak Factor 0.933 0.875 0.897 IW LIONHEAD Out In Total 1 01 I of I 01 I I I 01 01 01 Riliht 1 `L-► 1 I I I n o � J 1 * - a0 21 w North `—a ° U' w rn c - F- `• � c t—♦/ 7/5/02 4:15:00 PM 4—?A —A j I ZOa — _~ 7/5/02 5:00:00 PM 2 N w 0 v O: i Unshifted r % ... - — V a I I I ' Lft Thru I I I I II Out I I I981 I Total W LIONHEAD 1 I • IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : LION&FRONTAGEAM I Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 Page No : 1 I Groups Printed-1-Unsh fled LIONHEAD FRONTAGE LIONHEAD FRONTAGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru_ Right Int.Total ' Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 4 18 0 2 0 6 0 36 6 72 08:15 AM 0 0 0 4 43 0 6 0 2 0 43 2 100 08:30 AM 0 0 0 6 37 0 2 0 8 0 63 12 128 I 08:45 AM 0 0 0 5 27 0 2 0 5 0 48 11 98 Total 0 0 0 19 125 0 12 0 21 0 190 31 398 09:00 AM 0 0 0 6 32 0 8 0 5 0 55 7 113 I 09:15 AM 0 0 0 5 40 0 10 0 7 0 62 5 129 09:30 AM 0 0 0 8 51 0 9 0 4 0 61 4 137 09:45 AM 0 0 0 9 62 0 7 0 2 0 58 2 140 Total 0 0 0 28 185 0 34 0 18 0 236 18 519 I10:00 AM 0 0 0 5 54 0 5 0 6 0 64 8 142 10:15 AM 0 0 0 7 51 0 8 0 3 0 75 8 152 10:30 AM 0 0 0 10 70 0 6 0 10 0 76 7 179 I 10:45 AM 0 0 0 18 59 0 10 0 5 0 87 7 186 Total 0 0 0 40 234 0 29 0 24 0 302 30 659 11:00 AM 0 0 0 8 45 0 4 0 14 0 82 6 159 I 11:15 AM 0 0 0 9 56 0 4 0 14 0 100 4 187 Grand Total 0 0 0 104 645 0 83 0 91 0 910 89 1922 Apprch% 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.9 86.1 0.0 47.7 0.0 52.3 0.0 91.1 8.9 Total% 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 33.6 0.0 4.3 0.0 4.7 0.0 47.3 4.6 I LIONHEAD Out I I In o I I Total Of 1 I 101 01 101 I Right Thru Left I I g N I w = -- C---} North �7 - _ o X Q c0 ° O z- - or.c-� 7/5/02 8:00:00 AM 4-?V --45 Fi 0 - -r- 7/5/02 11:15:00 AM 2 rr ( If Of. -- N -� i 1-Unshifted t m I 4, 1 r Left Thru Right I 1831 01 1911 I 1931 I 1741 I 3871 I Out In Total LIONHEAD IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street IGolden, CO. 80403 File Name : LION&FRONTAGEAM Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 IPage No : 2 LIONHEAD FRONTAGE LIONHEAD FRONTAGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start Time Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right �p Int. Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 08:00 AM to 11:15 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 10:30 AM I Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 45 230 0 275 24 0 43 67 0 345 24 369 711 16.4 83.6 0.0 35.8 0.0 64.2 0.0 93.5 6.5 11:15 0 0 0 0 9 56 0 65 4 0 14 18 0 100 4 104 187 Volume I Peak Factor 0.951 High Int. 7:45:00 AM 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM Volume 0 0 0 0 10 70 0 80 4 0 14 18 0 100 4 104 Peak Factor 0.859 0.931 0.887 ILIONHEAD Out In Total 1 all 01 01 1 I ( 0l 01 01 Right T1 hru Left I I ,o N I w -6)- - North (7 rn — °— — 73 Z `n— t--■ 7/5/02 10:30:00 AM 4— N —1.453 3 Z I O - _ 7/5/02 11:15:00 AM 2 0 a D cc u_ - _ — 3j°, N pp))--,1 1-Unshifted io m SSS I I4, T r Left Thru Right 1241 01 1431 691 1 1671 1 1361 Out In Total LIONHEAD 1 r I i I IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : LION&FRONTAGEPM I Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 Page No : 1 I Groups Printed-Unshifted LION HEAD FRONTEGE RD LION HEAD FRONTEGE RD Southbound Westbound . Northbound Eastbound I Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int.Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 03:00 PM 0 0 0 11 77 0 15 0 13 0 69 6 191 03:15 PM 0 0 0 11 96 0 16 0 17 0 71 14 225 I 03:30 PM 0 0 0 9 103 0 9 0 10 0 74 12 217 03:45 PM 0 0 0 15 110 0 14 0 14 0 100 12 265 Total 0 0 0 46 386 0 54 0 54 0 314 44 898 04:00 PM 0 0 0 2 95 0 7 0 12 0 66 15 197 254 I 04:15 PM 0 0 0 18 101 0 18 0 17 0 92 8 04:30 PM 0 0 0 8 107 0 12 0 12 0 94 10 243 04:45 PM 0 0 0 12 102 0 15 0 15 0 85 14 243 I Total 0 0 0 40 405 0 52 0 56 0 337 47 937 05:00 PM 0 0 0 12 86 0 8 0 12 0 91 12 221 05:15 PM 0 0 0 10 56 0 5 0 15 0 85 15 186 Grand Total 0 0 0 108 933 0 119 0 137 0 827 118 2242 I Apprch% 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 89.6 0.0 46.5 0.0 53.5 0.0 87.5 12.5 Total% 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 41.6 0.0 5.3 0.0 6.1 0.0 36.9 5.3 LION HEAD Out In Total I I of I of I o I 1 1 01 01 01 Right Thru Left I 1 ? 1 - - - 0 I p �O F - North .-" - = 33 cf o _ ill �'- r-► 7/5/02 3:00:00 PM 4---�co -~ 7/5/02 5:15:00 PM 2 w ts m o m.- u O o o- ro-I D I - - o rn- I I 1 1 Left Thru Right 1 1191 01 1371 I 1 1 I 2281 1 2581 I 4821 Out In Total LION HEAD I I IAll Traffic Data Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street I Golden, CO. 80403 File Name : LION&FRONTAGEPM Site Code : 99923962 Start Date : 07/05/2002 IPage No : 2 LION HEAD FRONTEGE RD LION HEAD FRONTEGE RD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start Time Left Thru Right Total Total App' Left Thru Right APP' Left Thru Right App' Total Left Thru Right APp Totaint. Total l Peak Hour From 03:00 PM to 05:15 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:15 PM I Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 50 396 0 446 53 0 56 109 0 362 44 406 961 11.2 88.8 0.0 48.6 0.0 51.4 0.0 89.2 10.8 04:15 0 0 0 0 18 101 0 119 18 0 17 35 0 92 8 100 254 Volume I Peak Factor 0.946 High Int. 2:45:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 18 101 0 119 18 0 17 35 0 94 10 104 Peak Factor 0.937 0.779 0.976 ILION HEAD I Out I I In 01 I Total 01 I I I 1 of 01 01 ht Thru 1 Le 1 I I I CC -1 North m 'n °w s — O U CC N r Z W- - M —► 7/5/02 4:15:00 PM 4--- w -a g m I 1-- - 1--- LLrn aL pv - 7/5/02 5:00:00 PM Unshifted 2(8, m — — m 'o— c1v� i—I 4, r I r' Left Thru R I 53I 01 501 5 1 1 I I I 941 1 1091 I 2031 Out In Total LION HEAD I I I I Frontage Road Intersection 15-Minute Period Beginning Time Forest Road West Lionshead Lionshead 8:00 AM 114 124 89 I 8:15 AM 103 124 123 I 8:30 AM 103 123 159 I 8:45 AM 129 138 121 9:00 AM 135 165 139 I 9:15 AM 155 175 159 9:30 AM 160 183 169 I 9:45 AM 165 -, 3 'i3*= 172 10:00 AM 162 175 I 5k 10:15 AM 162 `� �'�� �- � � 187 10:30 AM 34 r =' I L 10:45 AM T3 164 �' I 11:00 AM � :� 167 J 9 h'.: 11:15 AM �`}= 187 4 30 �fs.XS'=„`,r dl 0 - 'SF"C' �,w �°,' 3`: 4" R ;" w'n i 3:00 PM 228 234 235 3:15 PM 251 247 277 I 3:30 PM 198 235 267 1 3:45 PM 256 285 326 I 4:00 PM 225 235 242 4:15 PM 221 d s x$ m _ z ` 4:30 PM 1 4:45 PM � ;d s� ,x -- fi x 5:00 PM � � � Js � �� � � , : � � � � � i I 5:15 PM2 250 229 I I I ATD Services, Inc. I 6214 Secrest Street Arvada,Co. 80403 t e 1 : FRONTAGE ROAD WEST OF Site: 2 2 : FOREST RD Date: 07/03/02 3 . rval Day: Wednesday E&W AM 50 .1:00 42 02:00 20 W3:00 20 04:00 5 05:00 21 106:00 174 07:00 302 08:00 521 09:00 555 110:00 526 11:00 574 12:PM 501 11:00 436 2:00 452 03:00 542 :00 651 05:00 624 06:00 539 07:00 362 108:00 301 09:00 247 10:00 174 11:00 127 is 7,766 IPeak 11:00 tune 574 IPeak 04:00 ume 651 I I I k I 1 lata File: VAIL#2 ATD Services,Inc. I 6214 Secrest Street Arvada,Co. 80403 ritlel : FRONTAGE ROAD WEST OF Site: 2 te2 : FOREST RD Date: 07/04/02 e3 . al Day: Thursday E&W 12.AM 71 01:00 51 02:00 32 3:00 8 04:00 12 05:00 18 ,06:00 120 07:00 274 08:00 436 09:00 485 110:00 521 11:00 578 12:PM 701 101:00 658 502:00 691 03:00 721 ,04:00 769 05:00 642 06:00 601 07:00 426 108:00 385 9:00 336 10:00 189 11:00 154 s 8,879 Peak 11:00 ume 578 Peak 04:00 ume 769 I I I I 1 1 lata File: VAIL#2 ATD Services,Inc. 1 6214 Secrest Street Arvada,Co. 80403 li e1 : FRONTAGE ROAD WEST OF Site: 2 e2 : FOREST RD Date: 07/05/02 e3 . n'al Day: Friday t' tin E&W AM 95 It:1:00 56 02:00 52 3:00 34 04:00 12 05:00 14 r 106:00 146 7:00 284 08:00 375 a 09:00 513 ,10:00 584 11:00 521 12:PM 620 101:00 636 2:00 684 03:00 781 :00 775 05:00 801 06:00 * 1007:00 8:00 * 09:00 * 10:00 * 111a1:00 6,983 Peak 10:00 itme 584 IPeak 05:00 tune 801 I I I i I I lata File: VAIL#2 ATD Services,Inc. I 6214 Secrest Street Arvada,Co. 80403 'itlel : FRONTAGE ROAD EAST OF Site: 1 Ie2 : PED BRIDGE Date: 07/03/02 e3 . ILI Day: Wednesday E&W AM 56 .1:00 38 02:00 24 3:00 10 14:00 3 05:00 29 :00 144 7:00 299 8:00 508 09:00 541 1110:00 544 1:00 548 12:PM 488 I1D1:00 429 1102:00 421 03:00 536 114:00 626 5:00 630 06:00 524 07:00 344 8:00 290 :00 278 ,` 10:00 160 1:00 122 is 7,592 IPeak 11:00 ume 548 Peak 05:00 630 I 1 t' I I I ha File: VAIL#1 ATD Services,Inc. I 6214 Secrest Street Arvada,Co. 80403 fitlel : FRONTAGE ROAD EAST OF Site: 1 1e2 : PED BRIDGE Date: 07/04/02 e3 . rval Day: Thursday in E&W 1AM 62 .1:00 47 02:00 28 I003: 11 00 4:00 14 05:00 20 6:00 134 7:00 262 8:00 422 09:00 490 110:00 547 11:00 565 12:PM 694 1:00 642 W2:00 684 03:00 743 I5:00 791 :00 666 06:00 623 07:00 456 8:00 392 :00 327 10:00 202 L 1:00 184 is 9,006 Peak 11:00 ume 565 Peak 04:00 791 I I 1 I I Ita File: VAIL#1 ATD Services,Inc. I 6214 Secrest Street Arvada,Co. 80403 itlel : FRONTAGE ROAD EAST OF Site: 1 1e2 : PED BRIDGE Date: 07/05/02 e3 . ral Day: Friday E&W AM 82 1:00 45 02:00 51 1003:00 22 4:00 6 05:00 24 6:00 158 7:00 221 8:00 320 09:00 535 110:00 678 11:00 698 12:PM 687 I1:00 658 2:00 702 03:00 876 :00 921 5:00 812 6:00 102 07:00 * 111:00 :00 10:00 * lit 1:00 * is 7,598 Peak 11:00 flume 698 '�Peak 04:00 #,"„„"� 921 I I I I I 1 I 1ta File: VAIL#1 1 1 I I I I APPENDIX B Trip Generation Worksheets 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study I I 1 Vail Resorts' Lionshead Development Summary of New Trip Generation for Entire Development ITrip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour IEnter Exit Total Enter Exit Total West Day Lot 31 50 81 58 43 101 ICore Area 20 21 41 27 34 61 Tennis Court Site 1 0 1 1 1 2 INorth Day Lot 28 16 44 16 27 43 ITotal (Net New Trips) 80 87 167 102 105 207 I I I I I I I I r I v I I 1 Vail Resorts'Lionshead Development Summary of West Day Lot West Day Lot Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour IITE Code Size Unit Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Resort Hotel 330 90 units 20 8 28 16 22 38 ICondos 230 113 units 9 41 50 40 19 59 Recreational Homes 260 16 units 2 1 3 2 2 4 Total - - - 31 50 81 58 43 101 I I I t I I 1 I I I 1 1 EarKimley-Ho and Associarn tes,Inc. 1 Project Lionshead I Subject Trip Generation for Hotel in West Day Lot Designed by EAG Date May 04, 2004 Job No. 067867.001 Checked by Sheet No. 1 of 1 I TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES IITE Trio Generation Manual 7th Edition,Average Rate ILand Use Code-Resort Hotel (330) Independant Variable- Rooms X I X _ 90 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends IPeak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (page 625) Directional Distribution: 72% ent. 28% exit. I (T)= 0.31(X) (T)= 0.31 * (90.0) T = 28 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 20 entering 8 exiting 20 + 8 = 28 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 626) IDirectional Distribution: 43% ent. 57% exit. (T)= 0.42 (X) T = 38 Average Vehicle Trip Ends I (T)= 0.42 * (90.0) 16 entering 22 exiting 16 + 22 = 38 I I 1 I I P.�'''` K1mieyHorn ishassr and Associates,Inc Project Lionshead ' Subject Trip Generation for Townhomes at West Day Lot Designed by EAG Date May 04, 2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ' ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition, Averge Rate Land Use Code- Residential Condominium/Townhouse (230) Inde endant Variable p - Dwelling Units (X) X = 113 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends 9 P Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (page 368) Directional Distribution: 17% ent. 83% exit. (T)=0.44 (X) T = 50 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T)=0.44 * 113.0 9 entering 41 exiting 9 + 41 = 50 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 369) Directional Distribution: 67% ent. 33% exit. (T)=0.52 (X) T = 59 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T)=0.52* 113.0 40 entering 19 exiting 40 + 19 = 59 I i Crain KHm es,Inc. I Project Lionshead I Subject Trip Generation for Seasonal Homes Designed by EAG Date May 04, 2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Date Sheet No. 1 of 1 I TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES rITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition, Fitted Curve Equations ILand Use Code- Recreational Homes (260) Independant Variable-Dwelling Units (X) X = 16 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (page 509) I (T)= 0.16* (X) Directional Distribution: 67% ent. 33% exit. Average Ve T = 3 Vehicle Trip Ends (T)=0.16* (16.0) 2 entering 1 exiting i 1 2 + 1 = 3 IPeak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 510) Directional Distribution: 41% ent. 59% exit. I (T)= 0.26 (X) T = 4 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T)=0.26' (16.0) 2 entering 2 exiting I 2 + 2 = 4 I I I I I i I I 1 Vail Resorts'Lionshead Development Summary of Core Area IExisting Use Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Size Unit Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total IEmployee Housing 220 100 persons 4 10 14 9 5 14 Office 710 18,000 sq. ft. 25 3 28 5 22 27 IRetail* LMP 32,480 sq. ft. 4 2 6 9 12 21 Total - - - 33 15 48 23 39 62 I 'trip generation rates from the FHU Lionshead Village Transportation Analysis were used because ITE does not provide AM trip generation for this land use IFuture Use Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Size Unit Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total IResort Hotel 330 85 units 19 7 26 15 21 36 Condos 230 70 units 5 26 31 24 12 36 ISkier Club - 75 parking 25 0 25 0 25 25 spaces Retail* LMP 39,900 sq. ft. 4 3 7 11 15 26 ' Total - - - 53 36 89 50 73 123 *trip generation rates from the FHU Lionshead Village Transportation Analysis were used because ITE does not provide AM trip generation for I P9 9 P Ys P P9 this land use I Net(Future- Existing) Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Size Unit Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Retail LMP 7,420 sq.ft. 0 1 1 2 3 5 I Non Retail ITE = 20 20 40 25 31 56 Total 20 21 41 27 34 61 I I 1 I I I i Key-Hom and Associates,Inc. I Project Vail Resorts' Lionshead Development I Subject Trip Generation for Existing Employee Housing at Sunbird Lodge Designed by EAG Date May 04, 2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Sheet No. 1 of 1 I TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES IITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition,Average Rates Use Code-Apartment, (220) ILand Inde endant Variable- Persons (X) I X = 100 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends IAM Peak Hour(recommended rates from Town of Vail), directional distribution pane 309 Directional Distribution: 29% ent. 71% exit. I T= 0.135 (X) T = 14 4 entering Average Vehicle Trip Ends T= 0.135 * 100.0 10 exiting 4 + 10 = 14 I PM Peak Hour(recommended rates from Town of Vail),directional distribution pane 310 I Directional Distribution: 61% ent. 39% exit. T=0.135 (X) T = 14 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T=0.135 * 100.0 9 entering 5 exiting I9 + 5 = 14 1 I * The average rate for Weekday daily trips(page 315)is 3.35. In order to determine an average rate for the peak hour of the generator for Weekday,two trips were subtracted out to represent employee trips to and Ifrom work and then a 90%reduction was taken from the daily trips to represent the peak hour trips. Ii I cznK lmH and iey Associaorn tes,Inc. Project Lionshead ' Subject Trip Generation for Existing Office Use in Core Area Designed by EAG Date May 04, 2004 Job No. 067867.001 Checked by Date Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition,Average Rates Land Use Code-General Office Building (710) Inde endant Variable- 1000 Square Feet(X) ' X = 18.000 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends A.M. Peak Hour(page 1159) Directional Distribution: 88% ent. 12% exit. ' (T)= 1.55 (X) (T)= 1.55* 18.0 T = 28 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 25 entering 3 exiting 25 + 3 = 28 P.M. Peak Hour(page 1160) ' Directional Distribution: 17% ent. 83% exit. T= 1.49 (X) T = 27 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T= 1.49* (18.0) 5 entering 22 exiting 5 + 22 = 27 I EonKimley-In and Associates,Inc. Project Lionshead Subject Trip Generation for Existing Retail and Restaurant in Core Area Designed by EAG Date August 30,2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Date Sheet No. 1 of 1 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition, Average Rate Land Use Code-Specialty Retail Center(814) ' Independant Variable- 1000 S . Feet Gross Leasable Area X p 4 (X) X _ 32.5 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, (rates from Lionshead Masterplan) ' entering (T;,,) =0.11 (X) (T) = 6 exiting (Tout) =0.07 (X) (Tin) = 4 entering ' (Tom) = 2 exiting entering (T;n) =0.11 * (32.5) exiting (Tout) = 0.07 * (32.5) ' PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic (rates from Lionshead , 1 Masterplan) = entering (T,) =0.28(X) (T) 21 exiting (Tout)=0.37 (X) (Tin) = 9 entering (Tont) = 12 exiting entering (T;0) =0.28* (32.5) exiting (Tot) = 0.37* (32.5) 1 EffinKImIejl Horn and Associates,Inc. Project Lionshead Subject Trip Generation for Hotel in Core Area Designed by CDR Date August 30, 2004 Job No. 067867.001 Checked by Sheet No. 1 of 1 I TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition, Average Rate Land Use Code-Resort Hotel (330) ' Inde endant Variable- Rooms (X) X = 85 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic,One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (page 625) ' (T)= 0.31(X) Directional Distribution: 72% ent. 28% exit. T = 26 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T)= 0.31 * (85.0) 19 entering 7 exiting 1 19 + 7 = 26 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 626) Directional Distribution: 43% ent. 57% exit. ' (T)=0.42 (X) T = 36 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T)=0.42* (85.0) 15 entering 21 exiting 15 + 21 = 36 1 I conlimley-Horn and Assoaates,Inc. Project Lionshead Subject Trip Generation for Condominiums at Core Area Designed by CDR Date August 30, 2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Sheet No. 1 of 1 I TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition, Averge Rate Land Use Code- Residential Condominium/Townhouse (230) lndependant Variable-Dwelling Units X O ' X = 70 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (page 368) Directional Distribution: 17% ent. 83% exit. ' (T)= 0.44 (X) (T)=0.44* 70.0 T = 31 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 5 entering 26 exiting 5 + 26 = 31 Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic,One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 369) ' Directional Distribution: 67% ent. 33% exit. (T)=0.52 (X) T = 36 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T)=0.52* 70.0 24 entering 12 exiting 24 + 12 = 36 1 I G:\-tpto\067867001 Vail Resorts\Lionshead\May 04 Revision\Trip Generation\[Core_Condo.xlsjSheet 1 1 IN1, Kimleyl-brr and Associates,Inc. Project Lionshead Redevelopment ' Subject Trip Generation for Ski Club Designed by CDR Date August 30, 2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Sheet No. 1 of 1 1 Ski Club Membership Trip Generation 75 proposed ski club members with 75 parking spaces. All 100% of parking spaces are expected to be occupied. It can be expected that 33% of all trips arriving will occur during common peak hour per Vail Resorts Information. Therefore, it is assummed that 75 club members would be generated on an y g iven Saturday. ay. 150 daily trips (one entering and one exiting per club member) Of these 75 club members attracted, 33%would arrive during the common peak hour resulting in 25 peak hour trips (75 members per day x 0.33 arrive in peak hour) These peak hour trips would be expected to be arriving during the morning peak hour and departing during the evening peak hour. 25 AM peak hour trips entering 25 PM peak hour trips exiting 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t van Kimley-I'om and Assoc etas,Inc. 1 Project Lionshead 1 Subject Trip Generation for Retail and Restaurant in Core Area Designed by CDR Date August 30, 2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Date Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition,Average Rate Equations Land Use Code- Specialty Retail Center(814) Independant Variable- 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X q (X) 1 X = 39.9 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends AM Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic. (rates from Lionshead Masterplan) ' entering (T;n) =0.11 (X) (T) = 7 exiting (Tom) =0.07 (X) (Tin) = 4 entering (T0,t) = 3 exiting ' entering (T;n) =0.11 * (39.9) exiting (Tout) = 0.07' (39.9) PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, (rates from Lionshead Masterplan) entering T =0.28(X) (T)= 26 exiting (Tout) =0.37 (X) (T;n) = 11 entering (Tout)= 15 exiting entering (T;n) =0.28* (39.9) exiting (Tout) = 0.37 ' (39.9) 1 1 Vail Resorts'Lionshead Development Summary of Tennis Court Site Tennis Court Site Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ' ITE Code Size Unit Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Recreational Homes 260 8 units 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ColnK ey�HOrn and Associates,Inc. Project Lionshead Redevelopment Subject Trip Generation for Seasonal Homes on Tennis Court Site Designed by EAG Date May 04, 2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Date Sheet No. 1 of 1 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition, Fitted Curve Equations Land Use Code-Recreational Homes (260) Independant Variable-Dwelling Units (X) X = 8 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (page 509) Directional Distribution: 67% ent. 33% exit. (T)=0.16* (X) T = 1 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T)=0.16* (8.0) 1 entering 0 exiting ' 1 + 0 = 1 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 510) Directional Distribution: 41% ent. 59% exit. 1 (T)=0.26(X) T = 2 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T)= 0.26* (8.0) 1 entering 1 exiting 1 1 + 1 = 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vail Resorts'Lionshead Development Summary of North Day Lot site North Day Lot Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Code Size Unit Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Employee Housing 220 144 persons 6 13 19 12 7 19 Office 710 16,000 sq. ft. 22 3 25 4 20 24 Total 28 16 44 16 27 43 r I 1 I I I 1 I I I PP-11111111111 KimleyHorn �!. and Associates,Inc. Project Vail Resorts' Lionshead Development I Subject Trip Generation for Employee Housing at North Day Lot Designed by EAG Date May 04, 2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Sheet No. 1 of 1 I TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES IITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition,Average Rates Land Use Code-Apartment, (220) Independant Variable-Persons (X) I X = 144 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends IAM Peak Hour(recommended rates from Town of Vail),directional distribution page 309 Directional Distribution: 29% ent. 71% exit. I T=0.135 (X) T = 19 6 entering Average Vehicle Trip Ends T= 0.135 144.0 13 exiting I6 + 13 = 19 PM Peak Hour(recommended rates from Town of Vail), directional distribution page 310 IDirectional Distribution: 61% ent. 39% exit. T=0.135 (X) T = 19 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T=0.135 * 144.0 12 entering 7 exiting 1 12 + 7 = 19 I I I * The average rate for Weekday daily trips(page 315)is 3.35. In order to determine an average rate for the peak hour of the generator for Weekday,two trips were subtracted out to represent employee trips to and Ifrom work and then a 90%reduction was taken from the daily trips to represent the peak hour trips. I I I 1 conKey Horn and Associates,Inc. Project Lionshead ' Subject Trip Generation for VR offices Designed by EAG Date May 04, 2004 Job No. 067867001 Checked by Date Sheet No. 1 of 1 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition,Average Rates Land Use Code-General Office Building (710) Inde endant Variable- 1000 Square Feet(X) X = 16.000 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends A.M. Peak Hour(page 1159) Directional Distribution: 88% ent. 12% exit. ' (T)= 1.55 (X) (T)= 1.55* 16.0 T = 25 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 22 entering 3 exiting 22 + 3 = 25 P.M. Peak Hour(page 1160) ' Directional Distribution: 17% ent. 83% exit. T= 1.49 (X) T = 24 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T= 1.49* (16.0) 4 entering 20 exiting 4 + 20 = 24 I I I I I I APPENDIX C HCS Intersection Analysis Worksheets 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I Vail Resorts' Lionshead Redevelopment ' Traffic Impact Study TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound f Movement I 1 2 I 3 4 I 5 6 L T I R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 0 375 110 180 I 470 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 394 I 115 189 494 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 ( 0 I 0 ( 1 0 Configuration TR I LT I I Upstream Signal I I 0 I I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L T ] R L T I R Volume (veh/h) I 30 I 0 I 30 I 0 I _ 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 31 0 31 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I I N I I N Storage I 0 I 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR Control Delay,Queue Length, Level of Service` Approach I EB WB I Northbound Southbound Movement I 1 4 I 7 8 I 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT I LR Volume, v (vph) I 189 I I 62 Capacity, cm (vph) 1002 228 v/c ratio 0.19 0.27 Queue length (95%) ( 0.69 I 1.07 Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.4 I I 26.6 LOS A D Approach delay (s/veh) -- - 26.6 Approach LOS -- -- D - HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d r irn TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement ' 1 ' 2 I 3 4 5 I 6 L ' T R L T ' R Volume (veh/h) ' 0 ' 475 I 65 I 115 ' 520 ' 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ' 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 ' 500 I 68 121 547 ' 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I ' 0 ' I I 0 Lanes I 0 ( 1 ( 0 I 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I TR LT Upstream Signal ' 0 0 Minor Street ' Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 8 I 9 ' 10 ' 11 I 12 L I T I R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 180 ' 0 325 ' 0 ( 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF ' 0.95 I 0.95 ' 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 189 0 342 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy ` vehicles, PHV 1 0 1 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I N I I N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB I Northbound Southbound Movement ( 1 4 I 7 I 8 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I LT I LR Volume, v (vph) 121 I 531 I I LCapacity, cm (vph) 961 J I 283 v/c ratio 0.13 I 1.88 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.43 36.46 I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.3 437.6 I I I LOS A F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 437.6 Approach LOS -- -- F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information (Site Information I Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 - Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 I 2 3 4 I 5 6 L I T I R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 0 I 375 I 110 180 470 0 ] Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 394 I 115 I 189 I 494 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R I L ( T Upstream Signal I 0 I I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 ( 10 I 11 I 12 L T I R I L T R Volume (veh/h) 30 0 I 30 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 31 0 I 31 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I I N I I I N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 I RT Channelized? I I I 0 I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L I R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB I Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration L I L I I R Volume, v (vph) 189 31 I 31 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 1002 680 655 I l t v/c ratio 0.19 I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.69 0.14 I 0.15 Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.4 I 10.5 I I 10.8 I I I LOS I A B I I B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.7 I Approach LOS -- -- I B I IR.520001M Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CDR Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 05/04/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road INorth/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 3 I 4 I 5 ' 6 L T Volume (veh/h) ' 0 I 475 65 I 115 I 520 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 500 68 I 121 I 547 ' 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 ' I ' 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 1 j 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration T R I L I T Upstream Signal ' ' 0 I I I 0 I Minor Street I Northbound ' Southbound Movement 7 8 ' 9 ' 10 ( 11 I 12 L I T I R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) I 180 I 0 I 325 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 ' 0.95 I 0.95 ' 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 189 0 _ 342 0 0 _ 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 1 0 1 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach j N I I N Storage I I 0 I I 0 I RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration I L ' I R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB I WB I Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 ( 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 Lane Configuration I L I L I I R Volume, v (vph) ( 121 I 189 I I 342 Capacity, cm (vph) 961 749 573 v/c ratio 0.13 0.25 I 0.60 I I Queue length (95%) I 0.43 1.00 I I 3.91 Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.3 I 11.4 I I 20.2 I I LOS A I B I I C I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 17.0 Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment:no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound _ Movement 1 ' 2 3 ( 4 I 5 I 6 L ( T I R ' L T ' R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 422 110 180 514 ' 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 444 115 189 541 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 ' 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal ' ' 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 ' 9 ' 10 ' 11 12 L ( T R I L T I R Volume (veh/h) I 30 ' 0 ' 30 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 l 0.95 ' 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 31 ( 0 I 31 ' 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach N _ N Storage I 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 0 Lanes 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service'' Approach I EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 9 10 ( 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I I LT I I LR I Volume, v(vph) I 189 I 62 I I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 959 198 v/c ratio 0.20 ( I 0.31 I I I I Queue length (95%) 0.73 I 1.27 I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.7 I I 31.3 I I LOS A I I D I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 31.3 Approach LOS -- -- D HCS'2000TNt Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 L T R L T I R Volume (veh/h) 0 531 65 116 I 575 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 558 I 68 122 I 605 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 ( I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 I 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 I I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 L T R L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 181 I 0 I 326 ( 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 190 0 343 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 1 0 1 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach I N N Storage I 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LR I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 I 8 9 I 10 I 11 12 Lane Configuration I LT I I LR I Volume, v (vph) 122 I I 533 I I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 914 245 l _) v/c ratio 0.13 2.18 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.46 I 40.89 I I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.5 574.6 I LOS I A I F I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- 574.6 I I Approach LOS -- -- I F I I HC'S20001 nt Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance .- Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 ' 2 I 3 I 4 5 6 L I T ' R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) ' 0 422 110 180 514 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 444 115 189 541 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type ' Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes ' 0 I 1 I 1 1 ' 1 I 0 Configuration T I R L I T Upstream Signal ' ( 0 I I 0 I ( r Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 ' 9 10 11 ' 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 30 I 0 ' 30 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF ' 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 31 0 31 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I N N Storage I 0 I 0 RT Channelized? 0 I I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 ' 0 Configuration L I R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement I 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I I L I L R I I Volume, v(vph) 189 31 31 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 959 665 614 v/c ratio I 0.20 0.05 0.05 I I I I Queue length (95%) 0.73 0.15 0.16 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 10.7 11.2 LOS A B I B I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.9 Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000T b7 Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 4 5 6 L I T I R L T I R Volume (veh/h) I 0 690 I 95 115 I 800 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 726 100 121 I 842 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 0 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 ( 1 0 j 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I TR ( LT Upstream Signal I 0 ( I I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L I T I R I L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 195 ( 0 340 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 205 0 357 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 1 0 1 0 0 0 J Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I I N I I ( N I I Storage I I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service' Approach I EB I WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I LT I I LR I I Volume, v (vph) I I 121 I I 562 I I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 767 l I 144 v/c ratio I 0.16 I 3.90 Queue length (95%) I 0.56 I 56.01 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.6 1369 I I I LOS B I F I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- I 1369 Approach LOS -- I -- I F f HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d OS all TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement � 2 T L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 595 135 205 I 655 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 626 I 142 I 215 I 689 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L I T Upstream Signal I 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L I T R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 45 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 47 I 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I I N I I N Storage I 0 I I I 0 I RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I L I I I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement I 1 I 4 7 I 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I I L L I Volume, v (vph) 215 47 I I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 799 575 v/c ratio 0.27 0.08 I I Queue length (95%) 1.09 0.27 I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 11.2 11.8 I I I LOS I I B B I I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- 11.8 Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I d i• TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West 1Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 6 L I T 1 R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 0 I 690 I 95 115 I 800 ( 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 726 100 I 121 l 842 l 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration T I R L I T Upstream Signal I I 0 I 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement 7 ( 8 9 10 I 11 I 12 L T R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) I 195 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 205 0 0 0 I 0 ( 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 1 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I N I N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 1 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration L I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 1 I 4 7 I 8 9 ( 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L I I I I Volume, v (vph) I I 121 205 I I I ---- Capacity, cm (vph) 767 668 v/c ratio 0.16 0.31 I I Queue length (95%) 0.56 1.30 I I I II Control Delay (s/veh) I 10.6 I 12.8 LOS B I B I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.8 Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 6 _I L I T R L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 0 I 640 135 205 I 700 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 673 I 142 I 215 I 736 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 0 13 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? l I 0 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 0 I 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I TR LT Upstream Signal I 0 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 9 10 ( 11 I 12 L I T I R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) I 45 ( 0 45 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 47 0 ( 47 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach N I N Storage I I 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration ( LR I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 I - 4 I 7 l 8 I 9 I 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I I LT I LR I I I I Volume, v(vph) 215 1 94 Capacity, cm (vph) 766 J 96 v/c ratio 0.28 0.98 I Queue length (95%) 1.15 5.81 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 166.4 I I LOS B I F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 166.4 Approach LOS -- -- I F HCS2000T" Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 4 5 I 6 L I T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 745 I 95 115 855 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 784 100 121 I 900 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 1 0 0 I 1 0 Configuration I I TR LT Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 10 11 12 L L T R I L j T R Volume (veh/h) I 195 I 0 I 340 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 205 I 0 I 357 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 1 0 1 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach I N I I N A Storage I I 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 0 I 0 ( 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR [ j Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 ( 8 9 10 ( 11 12 Lane Configuration I I LT I I LR I I I Volume, v (vph) 121 I 562 Capacity, cm (vph) 729 125 v/c ratio 0.17 4.50 Queue length (95%) 0.59 58.24 l J Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 1643 LOS B I I F I I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 1643 Approach LOS -- I -- I F I HCS2000TMI Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information (Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 I 5 I 6 L I T I R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 640 I 135 205 I 700 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ( 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 673 I 142 I 215 Ii 736 ( 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PER/ 0 -- -- 13 -- -- Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 0 Configuration T I R I L I T Upstream Signal I 0 J I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L I T I R L T L R Volume (veh/h) 45 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 47 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I I N I I I N I Storage I I 0 I I I 0 I RT Channelized? I I 0 I_ I I 0 Lanes 1 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration L I I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 I 7 I 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I L I L I I Volume, v (vph) I I 215 47 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) I 766 558 l I I l v/c ratio I 0.28 I 0.08 I I I I Queue length (95%) I 1.15 I 0.27 I I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 12.0 LOS B I 8 I I I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.0 I Approach LOS -- -- B I HC;51.0001 NI Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information I ' Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Garage Entrance Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Parking Garage Entrance Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 3 4 I 5 6 L I T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 0 I 745 I 95 115 855 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 784 100 121 900 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration I I T R I L I T Upstream Signal 0 I I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 ( 11 I 12 L T I R I L I T I R Volume (veh/h) I 195 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 205 0 0 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 1 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I N I I N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 I RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 1 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration L I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service EB I WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 1 4 I 7 I 8 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I L L I I I I Volume, v (vph) I 121 I 205 I I I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 729 652 I v/c ratio I 0.17 I 0.31 Queue length (95%) 0.59 I 1.34 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 13.0 II LOS B I 8 Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.0 I Approach LOS -- I -- I B HCS200O r^1 Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 1Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L I T R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 395 I 145 110 390 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 - Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 415 152 ( 115 I 410 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement ] 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 80 I 0 I 90 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 84 0 94 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 23 0 23 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR Control Delay, Queue length, Level of Service Approach EB WB ( Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 I 8 9 10 I 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR ' Volume, v (vph) I I 115 I 178 Capacity, cm (vph) 953 277 v/c ratio 0.12 I I 0.64 I I Queue length (95%) 0.41 I 4.06 LControl Delay (s/veh) 9.3 I I 38.7 LOS A E Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- I 38.7 IL Approach LOS -- -- E HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information 1Site Information I Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment:no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 I 3 4 I 5 6 L T R Volume (veh/h) I 0 I 420 I 120 I 135 565 0 J Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 442 126 I 142 I 594 0 J Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I j 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I TR I LT I I Upstream Signal I 0 I I I 0 I Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 I 9 10 ( 11 12 L T R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 85 0 I 120 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 89 0 126 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 27 0 27 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I I N I N Storage I I 0 I I 0 I RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 _I Configuration I LR I I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration LT I I LR I I I Volume, v (vph) I 142 215 I I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 961 217 v/c ratio 0.15 0.99 I I Queue length (95%) 0.52 I 8.86 I I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.4 I I 105.5 I I I I LOS A I I F I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 105.5 I Approach LOS -- I -- F HC.S20001M Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information IAnalyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 I Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 5 6 L I T R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 0 395 145 I 110 390 [ 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 415 152 I 115 I 410 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal I I 0 I 0 I I Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L I T I R I L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 80 I 0 I 90 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 84 0 94 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 23 0 23 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I I N I I I N Storage I I 0 I 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L I I R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB I Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration L L I I R I I I Volume, v (vph) 115 84 I I 94 I Capacity, cm (vph) 953 547 ( 595 _I v/c ratio 0.12 I 0.15 I 0.16 I I I I Queue length (95%) I 0.41 0.54 0.56 I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.3 12.8 I 12.2 I i LOS A B B I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- I 12.5 J Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d sr TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ris Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 IAnalysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 3 I 4 I 5 6 L I T R L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 0 420 I 120 I 135 I 565 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 442 I 126 I 142 I 594 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 0 11 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 0 Configuration T R L I T Upstream Signal 0 I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 8 I_ 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L T I R I L T I R Volume (veh/h) ( 85 I 0 120 I 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 89 0 I 126 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 27 0 27 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) ( 0 0 Flared approach I N J I I N Storage ( I 0 J I I 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration [ L [ [ R I , Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 1 4 7 I 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I I L L I R Volume, v (vph) 142 89 126 Capacity, cm (vph) 961 445 566 v/c ratio I 0.15 0.20 I 0.22 Queue length (95%) 0.52 I 0.74 I 0.85 Control Delay (s/veh) 1 9.4 15.1 13.2 LOS A C B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 14.0 Approach LOS -- -- B J I HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d IOW ilb TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 J L I T R L I T [ R Volume (veh/h) I 0 442 I 145 110 434 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 465 I 152 I 115 I 456 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 i Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 1 I _ 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR I LT Upstream Signal I I 0 I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 ( 8 I 9 I 10 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 80 I 0 I 90 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 84 0 94 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 23 0 23 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage I 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service, Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR I I Volume, v (vph) I 115 I 178 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 912 I I 245 v/c ratio 0.13 0.73 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.43 I 4.99 I I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.5 I I 50.8 I I LOS A F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- I 50.8 Approach LOS -- -- F Am HCS2000 m Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d ow TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information , Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 I 3 4 I 5 I 6 L I T R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 476 120 I 135 I 621 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 501 I 126 I 142 I 653 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L I T I R I L I T I R Volume (veh/h) ( 85 ( 0 120 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 89 0 126 0 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 27 0 27 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N I I N Storage I I 0 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB I Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 I 8 9 I 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration LT I LR I I I I Volume, v (vph) 142 I I 215 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 913 187 v/c ratio 0.16 1.15 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.55 I 10.90 I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 I 163.3 LOS I A I I F I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- I 163.3 Approach LOS -- I -- I F I HC S'2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 I 3 4 5 I 6 L I T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 442 145 I 110 I 434 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 465 I 152 ( 115 ( 456 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P 0 13 HV Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration T R L I T Upstream Signal ( 0 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L I T I R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) I 80 I 0 90 I 0 I 0 j 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 84 0 94 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 23 0 23 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I I N I I I N Storage I I 0 I I ( 0 I RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 ] 0 I 0 Configuration L I R I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 I 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I I L L I I R I I I Volume, v (vph) 115 ( 84 I I 94 I Capacity, cm (vph) 912 527 556 v/c ratio 0.13 0.16 0.17 I I Queue length (95%) 0.43 I 0.56 I I 0.60 I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.5 13.1 12.8 I I LOS A I B B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.9 Approach LOS -- I -- I B I HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id IMII TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West !Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 L T R L Volume (veh/h) 0 I 476 I 120 135 I 621 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 501 126 142 I 653 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 0 Configuration T R ( L I T Upstream Signal I I 0 I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 Volume (veh/h) 85 I 0 I 120 I 0 ( 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 89 0 126 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 27 0 27 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach I N I I N Storage I I 0 I I 0 I RT Channelized? I 0 I I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration L I R I I I Control Delay,Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB I Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 I 8 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration L L I R I I I Volume, v (vph) I I 142 89 I 126 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 913 l 423 523 I I l v/c ratio 0.16 0.21 I I 0.24 I I Queue length (95%) I 0.55 0.78 I- 0.93 I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 15.8 14.1 I I LOS A C 8 I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- I 14.8 I Approach LOS -- I -- I B I I HC52000T M Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E, Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment:no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 2 3 4 5 I 6 L I T I R L T I R Volume (veh/h) I 0 I 640 I 145 I 110 590 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 673 I 152 I 115 I 621 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 0 0 I 1 0 Configuration TR LT I I Upstream Signal I I 0 I I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 ( 10 I 11 I 12 L T I R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 80 I 0 I 90 I 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 ( 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 84 0 94 I 0 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 23 0 23 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I I N I N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB I Northbound Southbound Movement I 1 4 I 7 ( 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration LT I I LR I I I Volume, v (vph) I I 115 I I 178 Capacity, cm (vph) 760 148 m v/c ratio 0.15 I 1.20 Queue length (95%) I 0.53 I I 10.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.6 I I 198.4 I I I Ul II LOS I B I I F _ I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 198.4 IApproach LOS -- -- F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information 0',,,,-, A.,-- . Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment:no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 I 6 L I T I R I L ( T R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 665 120 135 ( 860 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 700 I 126 142 I 905 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 0 11 Median type ( Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration TR I LT I I Upstream Signal 0 I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 12 L I T I R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) I 85 I 0 I 120 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 89 0 126 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 27 0 27 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I N I I I N Storage I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB I WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 Lane Configuration LT I I LR I I I Volume, v (vph) I 142 I I 215 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 767 100 v/c ratio 0.19 I I 2.15 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.68 I I 18.69 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 10.8 618.8 I I I LOS B I F I I. Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- I 618.8 Approach LOS -- -- F low HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id n. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 ( 2 I 3 4 I 5 6 L ( T R ( L T R Volume (veh/h) I 0 I 640 I 145 110 I 590 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 673 I 152 I 115 I 621 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 I 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal I 0 I I 1 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 L T R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 80 I 0 I 90 I 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 84 0 94 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 23 0 23 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I I N I I N Storage 0 I ( I 0 I RT Channelized? I I 0 I ( i 0 Lanes 1 0 _I 1 0 0 I 0 Configuration L I R I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 7 8 9 10 ( 11 12 Lane Configuration I I L L R Volume, v (vph) 115 84 I 94 I Capacity, cm (vph) 760 454 421 v/c ratio 0.15 0.19 I 0.22 Queue length (95%) 0.53 I 0.67 I 0.84 I Control Delay (s/veh) 10.6 14.7 16.0 I I LOS B B I C I I. Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- 15.4 Approach LOS -- -- C Hc52000T5t Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information I Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 3 4 I 5 6 L T I R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 665 120 135 I 860 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 700 126 142 905 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration T R L I T Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 ( 8 9 10 I 11 I 12 L I T R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 85 0 120 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 89 0 I 126 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 27 0 27 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach I N I I N I I Storage I I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration I L I I R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service I Approach EB I WB I Northbound I Southbound I Movement 1 4 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 J 12 Lane Configuration L I L R I I I I Volume, v (vph) I I 142 I 89 I I 126 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) I 767 338 400 v/c ratio I 0.19 0.26 I I 0.31 I I I I Queue length (95%) 0.68 1.04 I I 1.33 I I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 10.8 19.4 I 18.1 I I I LOS B C C I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 18.6 _ Approach LOS -- I -- C HCS2000TM Copyright e©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 - Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 4 5 I 6 L I T I R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 685 145 110 635 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 721 152 115 I 668 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I I TR LT I I Upstream Signal I 0 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 I 12 L I T R L T R Volume veh/h) I 80 ( 0 90 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 84 0 94 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 23 0 23 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage I 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR I. _. Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 j 8 ( 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I LT I I LR Volume, v (vph) 115 I I 178 Capacity, cm (vph) 728 131 v/c ratio 0.16 1.36 Queue length (95%) 0.56 I 11.62 I I II Control Delay (s/veh) I 10.9 I 265.9 LOS I B I I F I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 265.9 Approach LOS -- I -- I F HCS2000Tm Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements EastNVest Street: South Frontage Road _North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 6 L T I R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 0 720 I 120 135 I 915 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 757 126 142 963 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal I 0 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 L I T I R I L T I R Volume (veh/h) 85 I 0 I 120 0 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 [ 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 89 0 _ 126 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 27 0 27 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 J Flared approach I I N I I I N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB Northbound I Southbound Movement I 1 4 I 7 I 8 9 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I I LT I LR Volume, v (vph) I 142 I 215 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) I I 729 85 v/c ratio 0.19 2.53 I I I I Queue length (95%) I 0.72 I 20.23 I I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 799.7 I I I LOS I B I F I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 799.7 Approach LOS -- -- F HCS2000TNt Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 6 L T I R I L I T R . Volume veh/h) j 0 685 145 110 635 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 721 152 115 I 668 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 13 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration T R L I T Upstream Signal I 0 � I I 0 I Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 ( 12 L I T I R L T I R Volume (veh/h) 80 I 0 I 90 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 84 0 94 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 23 0 23 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I N I I I N I Storage I I 0 I I I 0 I I RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 I 0 0 Configuration I L R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service ' I I Approach I EB I WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 I- 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I L L I I R I I I Volume, v (vph) I I 115 84 I I 94 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 728 I 436 394 _) v/c ratio 0.16 0.19 I I 0.24 I Queue length (95%) 0.56 0.70 0.92 ( I I J Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 15.2 I 17.0 I I -I LOS B C C I ( l Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- I 16.1 I I Approach LOS -- -- C HCS 000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 - Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 I 5 I 6 Volume (veh/h) I 0 I 720 I 120 I 135 I 915 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 757 j 126 I 142 963 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I ( 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration T R L I T Upstream Signal I 0 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 ( 10 I 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 85 I 0 I 120 ( 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 89 0 126 0 I 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 27 0 27 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 1 0 I 0 Flared approach 1 N N Storage 0 I I 0 I RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 I 0 Configuration L I R I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 1 4 7 ( 8 9 10 1 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I 1 L L R I 1 Volume, v (vph) 142 89 126 Capacity, cm (vph) 729 320 370 v/c ratio 0.19 0.28 0.34 Queue length (95%) 0.72 1.11 1.48 I I Control Delay (s/veh) ( 11.1 20.5 I 19.7 I LOS B C 1 C I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 20.0 Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id on TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 I 3 I 4 5 6 L T R L T I R Volume (veh/h) 0 390 35 I 85 385 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 410 I 36 I 89 I 405 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 16 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 1 I 0 Configuration I ( I TR LT Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 I I Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 I 9 ] 10 I 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 35 I 0 I 150 I 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) ( 36 0 I 157 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 22 0 22 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 I Flared approach I N N Storage I I 0 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 0 Lanes I 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 _1 Configuration I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound ( Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 I 11 I 12 ]I Lane Configuration LT LR ( I I Volume, v (vph) 89 ( 193 I I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 1044 450 v/c ratio 0.09 0.43 Queue length (95%) 0.28 2.11 I I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 18.9 I I LOS A C I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 18.9 I Approach LOS -- -- C I HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 I 5 6 L T I R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 0 405 35 95 555 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 426 I 36 100 I 584 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 I 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I I TR LT I I Upstream Signal 0 I 0 I Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 I 9 10 11 12 L T I R L T R Volume (veh/h) 55 I 0 I 135 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 57 I 0 I 142 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage I I 0 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach ( EB ( WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 I 8 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I LT LR Volume, v (vph) I 100 199 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 1053 339 v/c ratio I I 0.09 I 0.59 I I Queue length (95%) I 0.31 3.55 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 29.7 LOS A I D I I I Approach delay (s/veh) I -- I -- 29.7 Approach LOS -- I -- D HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kim ley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road !North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West !Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street ! Eastbound Westbound Movement ! 1 2 ! 3 4 5 6 L T R L ! T I R 1 Volume (veh/h) 0 390 35 85 385 ! 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 ( 0.95 0.95 0.95 ! 0.95 ! 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) ! 0 ! 410 ! 36 89 ! 405 ! 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 16 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? ! ! ! 0 ! ! ! 0 Lanes ! 0 ! 1 ! 0 ! 1 ! 1 ! 0 Configuration ! ! ! TR I L ! T Upstream Signal 0 ! ( 0 Minor Street ! Northbound ! Southbound Movement ! 7 ! 8 9 ! 10 ! 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 35 0 150 I 0 ! 0 ! 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) ! 36 ! 0 ! 157 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 22 0 22 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I N N Storage 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? 0 I I I I I 0 Lanes ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 Configuration ! ! LR ! ! ! ! Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I L I LR Volume, v (vph) 89 193 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 1044 564 v/c ratio I 0.09 ( 0.34 Queue length (95%) 0.28 1.51 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 14.7 I I LOS A I B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 14.7 Approach LOS -- -- B I HCS2000TM Copyright CO 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d air TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Cir Date Performed 6/10/04 Jurisdiction Town of Vail Analysis Time Period Background PM Analysis Year 2005 Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 I 2 1 3 4 5 6 • L ( T [ R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 405 _ 35 95 I 555 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 426 I 36 I 100 I 584 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 0 11 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 I 1 ( 0 Configuration I I I TR L I T Upstream Signal 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 8 I _ 9 10 I 11 I 12 L T R L T ( R Volume (veh/h) [ 55 0 I 135 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 57 I 0 I 142 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I N N Storage 0 I 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 I 0 I 0 0 ( 0 Configuration LR I I Control Delay,Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 1 7 l 8 I 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I L LR Volume, v (vph) 100 I 199 Capacity, cm (vph) 1053 531 v/c ratio I 0.09 0.37 Queue length (95%) 0.31 1.73 I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 8.8 15.8 LOS A C I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.8 °'. Approach LOS -- -- I C HCS2000' Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 414 49 113 401 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 435 51 118 422 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 16 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 I 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I I TR LT Upstream Signal 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 ( 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 44 0 173 0 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 46 0 182 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 22 0 22 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 I 0 RT Channelized? I 0 0 Lanes I 0 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB I Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 ( 8 I 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I I LT LR Volume, v (vph) I I 118 228 Capacity, cm (vph) 1008 398 v/c ratio I 0.12 0.57 I I Queue length (95%) ( 0.40 3.46 Control Delay(s/veh) 9.0 25.5 I LOS A D I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- 25.5 Approach LOS -- -- D HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment:no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 2 3 4 I 5 I 6 L I T I R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 0 426 45 121 I 585 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 448 47 I 127 I 615 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes I 0 1 I 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I I TR LT Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 71 0 ( 170 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 74 I 0 I 178 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach N I N Storage I 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 I 1 0 Lanes 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 Configuration I I LR I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 7 I 8 9 10 11 1 12 Lane Configuration I I LT LR Volume, v (vph) I 127 252 Capacity, cm (vph) 1024 l 294 v/c ratio I I 0.12 0.86 I I Queue length (95%) 0.42 I 7.44 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 ( 61.0 I I LOS A F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 61.0 Approach LOS -- I -- F I HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d do TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement ( 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 L T R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 0 414 49 113 401 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF ( 0.95 0.95 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 435 I 51 I 118 I 422 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 16 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 1 0 I 1 1 I 0 Configuration I I TR L T Upstream Signal I I 0 I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 9 10 I 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 44 0 173 I 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 46 0 - 182 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 22 0 22 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I N N Storage I I 0 _J 0 RT Channelized? 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 0 I 0 0 ( 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 J Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 118 228 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 1008 553 v/c ratio 0.12 0.41 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.40 ( 2.01 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 16.0 I I LOS A I C I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 16.0 Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved Version 4.I d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 3 I 4 5 6 L I T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 426 45 121 I 585 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 ( 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 448 I 47 I 127 I 615 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 0 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration I I I TR L I T Upstream Signal 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 8 ( 9 10 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 71 I 0 170 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 74 I 0 178 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach I N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I ( 0 Lanes I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach ( EB I WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR I I I Volume, v (vph) 127 252 Capacity, cm (vph) 1024 527 v/c ratio 0.12 0.48 I Queue length (95%) 0.42 ( I 2.56 I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 17.9 I I LOS A C I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- I 17.9 Approach LOS I -- I -- I C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.ld a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Cir Date Performed 6/10/04 Jurisdiction Town of Vail Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road 'North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 ( 2 I 3 I 4 5 I 6 L T R L ' T R Volume (veh/h) 0 635 50 85 585 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF ' 0.95 0.95 ' 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 668 52 89 615 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 16 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? ] 0 ' ' 0 Lanes 0 I 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I I TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 46 ( 0 150 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 48 ' 0 ' 157 ' 0 ' 0 ' 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 22 0 22 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N I N Storage I I 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 0 Lanes ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration - LR ' ' Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR I I - Volume, v (vph) 89 205 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 821 250 I I v/c ratio 0.11 ( 0.82 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.36 6.40 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.9 I 62.3 LOS A F I I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 62.3 °I' Approach LOS -- -- F HCS2000' Copyright©2003 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 L I T I R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 0 650 105 150 ( 795 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 684 110 157 836 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I ( TR LT Upstream Signal I I 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 59 0 135 I 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 62 I 0 I 142 ( 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach I N I I N Storage 0 I 0 RT Channelized? 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 ( 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I LR I I Control Delay, Queue-Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I LT I I LR I Volume, v (vph) 157 I I 204 Capacity, cm (vph) 789 ( 139 v/c ratio I I 0.20 1.47 I I Queue length (95%) 0.74 13.71 I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 10.7 304.0 I I I I LOS I I B I F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 304.0 d' Approach LOS -- -- F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 2 .1 3 ( 4 I 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 635 j 50 85 585 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 ( 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 668 I 52 I 89 I 615 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 16 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 0 I 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration I I TR L T Upstream Signal I I 0 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) l 46 0 150 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 48 I 0 I 157 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P 22 0 22 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I N I I N Storage I I 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 ( I I 0 Lanes I I I 0 I 1 ( 0 0 I 0 Configuration I L I R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement I 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R I I Volume, v (vph) 89 48 I 157 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 821 485 410 v/c ratio 0.11 0.10 I 0.38 I I Queue length (95%) 0.36 0.33 I 1.76 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.9 13.2 19.1 LOS A B I I C I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- 17.7 Approach LOS -- I -- C HCS 2000?ht Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Cir Date Performed 6/10/04 Jurisdiction Town of Vail Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 2 I 3 4 I 5 6 L T R L 1 T [ R I Volume (veh/h) 0 650 105 150 I 795 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 684 I 110 157 I 836 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type 1 Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration I TR L I T Upstream Signal 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 59 ( 0 I 135 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 62 I 0 I 142 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach I N N Storage I 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 0 Lanes 1 I 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I L I I R I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB ( Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I L L R Volume, v (vph) 157 62 ( 142 Capacity, cm (vph) 789 347 394 v/c ratio 0.20 0.18 I 0.36 I Queue length (95%) 0.74 0.64 I 1.61 I Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 17.6 19.2 LOS B C I C Approach delay (s/veh) I -- I -- I 18.7 Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information (Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 5 6 L T R L T I R Volume (veh/h) 0 660 65 115 600 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 l 0.95 j Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 694 68 121 631 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 16 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 0 0 I 1 0 Configuration I I I TR LT Upstream Signal I I 0 F 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 55 I 0 175 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 57 I 0 184 I 0 ( 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 22 0 22 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 ( 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I I LT I LR I I Volume, v (vph) 121 241 I I I Capacity, cm (vph) 791 216 v/c ratio 0.15 I 1.12 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.54 ( 11.20 I I I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 10.4 ( 142.8 I I LOS B F I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 142.8 "' Approach LOS I -- -- F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d s TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 I 2 3 ' 4 I 5 ( 6 L ' T R L ' T R Volume (veh/h) 0 670 115 175 825 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF ' 0.95 0.95 ' 0.95 0.95 ' 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 ' 705 ( 121 ( 184 ' 868 ' 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PER/ 0 -- -- 11 -- -- Median type ' Undivided RT Channelized? ' I 0 ' ' 0 Lanes ' 0 ' 1 0 0 ' 1 I 0 Configuration ' ( ' TR LT Upstream Signal 0 ' ' 0 Minor Street ' Northbound ' Southbound Movement 7 ' 8 9 10 J 11 12 L T R L ( T R Volume (veh/h) I 75 ' 0 170 0 ( 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) ' 78 ' 0 178 0 I 0 ' 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach N I N Storage I ( 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I 0 Lanes ' 0 I 0 ' 0 ' 0 0 I 0 Configuration ' I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement I 1 4 7 8 9 10 I 11 12 Lane Configuration I LT LR Volume, v (vph) 184 256 Capacity, cm (vph) ( 767 118 v/c ratio I I 0.24 2.17 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.93 21.68 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 11.2 I 613.3 LOS B I F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 613.3 ' Approach LOS -- I -- F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d s TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 I 5 6 L I T I R L I T R Volume (veh/h) 0 660 65 115 I 600 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 694 68 I 121 I 631 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 16 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I I 0 ( I 0 Lanes 0 1 ( 0 1 1 0 Configuration I ( TR L I T Upstream Signal 0 I I 0 I Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 L T R L T ( R Volume (veh/h) 55 ( 0 I 175 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 57 I 0 I 184 0 I 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 22 0 22 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 _ 0 Flared approach N I N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 1 I 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L I I R I Control Delay, Queu ,.Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 I 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I I L L R Volume, v (vph) 121 57 I 184 Capacity, Cm (vph) 791 435 392 v/c ratio 0.15 0.13 0.47 I I Queue length (95%) I 0.54 0.45 I 2.43 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 10.4 14.5 22.0 LOS I I B B I I C Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- 20.3 ' Approach LOS -- I -- C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/E. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: E. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 J 2 3 4 I 5 I 6 L ( T R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 0 670 115 175 825 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 705 I 121 I 184 I 868 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 I 0 I 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration I I I TR I L I T Upstream Signal I I 0 I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 ( 9 10 I 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 75 I 0 I 170 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 78 I 0 I 178 I 0 I 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 17 0 17 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach N I N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 I 0 Lanes 1 I 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration L I I R I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound ( Southbound Movement ( 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I L L R Volume, v (vph) 184 78 178 Capacity, cm (vph) 767 308 380 v/c ratio I 0.24 0.25 ( 0.47 Queue length (95%) 0.93 0.98 I 2.41 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.2 20.6 I 22.5 LOS I B C C I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 22.0 - Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Cir Date Performed 6/10/04 Jurisdiction Town of Vail Analysis Time Period Background AM Analysis Year 2005 Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 4 I 5 1 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 415 215 55 365 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 436 I 226 I 57 I 384 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I - 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I ( I TR LT I I I Upstream Signal I ( 0 I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 [ 9 10 ( 11 12 L T R L ( T R Volume (veh/h) I 20 I 0 I 10 0 l 0 l 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ( 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 21 I 0 I 10 0 ( 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 9 0 9 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach I N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 0 Lanes 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 Configuration I I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I LT LR Volume, v (vph) 57 31 Capacity, cm (vph) 885 280 v/c ratio 0.06 I 0.11 Queue length (95%) 0.21 I 0.37 I 1 I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.3 19.5 LOS I A C I - I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 19.5 I Approach LOS -- -- C I HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street J Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 2 ( 3 4 I 5 6 L T R L T I R Volume (veh/h) 0 405 115 30 ( 580 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 426 121 31 610 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I I I 0 I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I I TR I LT Upstream Signal 0 I I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement [ 7 I 8 I 9 l 10 I 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 130 I 0 I 35 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 136 0 I 36 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 0 12 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 ( 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration LR I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I LT LR Volume, v (vph) 31 172 I Capacity, cm (vph) 979 231 v/c ratio I I 0.03 1 1 0.74 I I I Queue length (95%) ( I 0.10 I 5.15 I Control Delay (s/veh) ( 8.8 55.4 I I LOS A F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- I 55.4 I Approach LOS -- -- F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T ( R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 415 215 55 365 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 436 226 57 384 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 - Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I ( 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 ( 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration I T I R L T Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T I R Volume (veh/h) 20 0 10 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 21 0 10 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 9 0 9 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I N N Storage I 0 I 0 RT Channelized? I 0 0 Lanes 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 Configuration I LR I I . Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach ( EB ( WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 7 8 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I L LR Volume, v (vph) 57 31 Capacity, cm (vph) 885 640 v/c ratio 0.06 0.05 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.21 I I 0.15 I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.3 10.9 I I LOS A B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- I 10.9 I Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyright C h i 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 2 I 3 4 I 5 6 L T R L ( T R Volume (veh/h) 0 405 115 30 580 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 426 I 121 I 31 I 610 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration I I T I R I L I T Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 130 I 0 35 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) l 136 0 36 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 0 12 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 0 Lanes I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 Configuration I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L I LR Volume, v (vph) 31 I 172 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 979 1 602 v/c ratio 0.03 0.29 I I Queue length (95%) 0.10 1.17 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 13.4 I I I LOS A B I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.4 "' Approach LOS -- ( -- B HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 8/31/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 - Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 I 2 3 4 5 ] 6 L T R I L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 432 235 I 69 376 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 ( 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 ( 454 ( 247 ( 72 ( 395 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I I ( 0 I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 ( 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I ( TR LT Upstream Signal 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 10 [ 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 47 I 0 32 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 49 0 33 0 ( 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 9 0 9 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach N N J Storage 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 0 ( 0 I 0 I 0 ( 0 Configuration I I LR I I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 9 10 ( 11 12 Lane Configuration I I LT LR Volume, v (vph) I I 72 82 Capacity, cm (vph) 856 267 v/c ratio I I 0.08 0.31 Queue length (95%) 0.27 ( 1.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 ( 24.3 I I I LOS I I A I C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 24.3 Approach LOS -- I -- C J HCS2000TNt Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information West Lionshead Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 6 L T R L T I R Volume (veh/h) 0 417 _I 147 I 56 600 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 ] 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 I 438 I 154 I 58 I 631 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 I 1 0 Configuration I ( TR LT Upstream Signal { I 0 A I 0 Minor Street I Northbound ( Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 I 12 L T ( R L T R Volume (veh/h) 157 I 0 ( 54 I 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 165 ( 0 I 56 I 0 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 0 12 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 ( 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I I LT LR Volume, v (vph) 58 221 Capacity, cm (vph) 941 204 v/c ratio 0.06 1.08 l Queue length (95%) 0.20 10.23 I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.1 136.0 LOS A F I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 136.0 I Approach LOS -- -- I F I HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street ' Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 ' 2 ' 3 ' 4 ' 5 ' 6 L ' T ( R L ' T ' R Volume (veh/h) 0 432 235 69 376 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF ' 0.95 ' 0.95 0.95 0.95 ( 0.95 ' 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 ' 454 I 247 72 395 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I ' 0 ' I ' 0 Lanes 0 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 ' 0 Configuration ' T ' R L T Upstream Signal ' 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 ' 8 ' 9 10 11 ' 12 L T R L T I R Volume (veh/h) ' 47 ' 0 ' 32 0 0 ' 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 49 ' 0 33 ' 0 I 0 ' 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 9 0 9 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage I ( 0 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 0 Lanes 0 ' 0 I 0 0 0 ' 0 Configuration ' J LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L I LR Volume, v (vph) 72 82 Capacity, cm (vph) 856 613 v/c ratio 0.08 0.13 I I I I Queue length (95%) 0.27 0.46 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 11.8 LOS A B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.8 Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 2 I 3 4 I 5 6 L T R j L I T R Volume (veh/h) 0 417 147 56 I 600 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 438 154 58 631 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I ( 0 ( I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration I T ( R I L I T Upstream Signal I 0 ( I I 0 I Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 8 ( 9 10 I 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 157 I 0 I 54 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 165 I 0 I 56 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 0 12 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 0 Lanes 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR I Volume, v (vph) 58 221 Capacity, cm (vph) 941 562 v/c ratio I 0.06 0.39 I I I Queue length (95%) 0.20 1.86 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 I 15.5 I I LOS I A C I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.5 I Approach LOS I -- -- C I HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment:no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 I 2 3 4 I 5 I 6 L I T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 675 215 55 575 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 710 226 57 605 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 1 ( 0 0 I 1 I 0 I Configuration I I TR I LT I I Upstream Signal 0 I ( 0 I Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 I 12 L I T I R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 20 0 10 I 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 21 I 0 I 10 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 9 0 9 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I N I N Storage I I 0 I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 I Lanes I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 Configuration I LR I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT I LR Volume, v (vph) 57 31 Capacity, cm (vph) 696 144 v/c ratio I 0.08 0.22 J Queue length (95%) 0.27 0.78 i J Control Delay (s/veh) 10.6 36.7 LOS I I B I E I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- 36.7 "" Approach LOS -- I -- E HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Cir Date Performed 6/10/04 Jurisdiction Town of Vail Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound ' Westbound Movement 1 ' 2 3 ' 4 ' 5 ' 6 L T R ' L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 720 ' 115 40 815 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 ' 757 I 121 I 42 ' 857 ' 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? i ' 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 ' 1 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I I TR I LT Upstream Signal ' 0 I I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 ' 9 10 ' 11 ( 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 130 l 0 ' 35 ' 0 ' 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) ' 136 [ 0 ( 36 I 0 ' 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 0 12 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 I 0 ' 0 0 0 I 0 Configuration 1 LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I LT LR Volume, v (vph) 42 I I 172 Capacity, cm (vph) 733 99 v/c ratio 0.06 ( 1.74 Queue length (95%) i 0.18 ( 13.80 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 10.2 I ( 443.8 I l LOS B F I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- 443.8 Approach LOS -- I -- I F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 - Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound M ovement I 1 I 2 ( 3 4 5 I 6 L T I R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 675 215 55 I 575 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 710 226 I 57 I 605 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 -- -- 11 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 ( 1 I 0 Configuration I I T I R L I T Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 9 10 I 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 20 0 I 10 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 21 0 I 10 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, Pm/ 9 0 9 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 0 Lanes I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach j EB I WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 j 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 57 31 Capacity, cm (vph) 696 I I 498 J v/c ratio 0.08 I I 0.06 I Queue length (95%) I 0.27 ( 0.20 I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 10.6 12.7 I I I LOS I B B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.7 Approach LOS -- -- I B I HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d awls TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ` Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street ' Eastbound ' Westbound Movement ' 1 ' 2 3 ' 4 5 6 L ' T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 720 115 40 815 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF ' 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 ' 757 I 121 ' 42 ' 857 ' 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P 0 11 Pm/ Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I ' 0 ' 0 Lanes 0 ' 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration I T R L T Upstream Signal ' ' 0 ' 0 Minor Street ' Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 130 0 ' 35 ( 0 ' 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 136 0 36 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 0 12 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 _I 0 ' 0 0 I 0 ' 0 Configuration I I LR I I ' Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR I Volume, v (vph) 42 ( 172 I Capacity, cm (vph) 733 457 v/c ratio 0.06 ( 0.38 Queue length (95%) 0.18 ( 1.73 I I I I Control Delay (s/veh) 10.2 ( 17.6 I I LOS B C I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 17.6 Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment:no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 2 ( 3 I 4 5 6 L I T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 690 235 70 585 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 726 247 73 615 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 - 11 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I I TR I LT Upstream Signal 0 I I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 ( 11 I 12 L I T R L T I R Volume (veh/h) 45 I 0 I 30 i 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 j 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow (veh/h) 47 I 0 31 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 9 0 9 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage 1 0 I 0 I RT Channelized? 0 I 0 Lanes 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I I LR I I I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR I I I Volume, v (vph) 73 78 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 674 138 v/c ratio 0.11 0.57 I 1 1 Queue length (95%) 0.36 ( 2.83 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.0 ( 60.6 I I LOS B F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 60.6 — Approach LOS -- -- F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Cir Date Performed 6/10/04 Jurisdiction Town of Vail Analysis Time Period Total PM Analysis Year 2025 Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment:no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road INorth/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 2 ' 3 4 I 5 ' 6 L T ' R L [ T '. R J Volume (veh/h) 0 730 I 145 65 I 835 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 ' 0.95 ' 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 ( 768 ' 152 68 ' 878 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type ' Undivided RT Channelized? ' 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 I 0 ( 1 I 0 Configuration ' I I TR LT Upstream Signal ' I 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 ' 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 155 I 0 I 55 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) ' 163 I 0 I 57 ' 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 0 12 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage I i 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes I 0 ( 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration ' LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 68 220 I Capacity, cm (vph) 706 87 v/c ratio 0.10 2.53 Queue length (95%) 0.32 20.63 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.6 797.0 LOS B I F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 797.0 "' Approach LOS -- I -- I F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I d no TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements NB East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 3 I 4 I 5 6 L ( T R � L J T R Volume (veh/h) 0 690 235 70 585 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 726 247 73 I 615 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 0 Configuration I T I R L T Upstream Signal I 0 j I 0 I Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 9 10 I 11 12 L T R L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 45 I 0 30 I 0 I 0 I 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 47 0 31 I 0 I 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 9 0 9 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 I I 0 Lanes I 1 I 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 0 Configuration I L I I R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level"of Service Approach EB I WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Configuration I L I L I R Volume, v (vph) 73 47 31 Capacity, cm (vph) 674 516 413 v/c ratio I 0.11 I 0.09 0.08 I I I Queue length (95%) I 0.36 I 0.30 ( 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.0 I 12.7 14.4 I LOS B I B B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.4 " Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d ... TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information (Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/W. West Lionshead Cir Agency/Co. Kim ley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements NB East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: W. West Lionshead Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 ( 2 3 I 4 5 I 6 L T I R L I T ( R Volume (veh/h) 0 I 730 ( 145 65 835 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 768 ( 152 68 878 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 11 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration I I T I R I L I T Upstream Signal I 0 I I I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 11 12 Volume (veh/h) I 155 I 0 I 55 0 I 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 163 I 0 I 57 I 0 i 0 I 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 0 12 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach N ] I N I Storage I I 0 I I 0 I I RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 1 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 0 Configuration L R I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 I 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) I I 68 163 I I 57 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 706 435 ( 386 v/c ratio I 0.10 0.37 I ( 0.15 ( I I Queue length (95%) I 0.32 1.71 0.51 I I I Control Delay (s/veh) I 10.6 18.2 I 15.9 I I I LOS I B C C I I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- 17.6 Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000T^I Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 L T R I L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 51 I 615 13 14 I 340 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 53 I 647 13 14 357 47 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 12 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration LTR ( I LTR Upstream Signal I 0 I I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 13 3 I 10 6 I 1 I 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 13 3 10 6 I 1 I 4 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach I N N Storage I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I 0 I ( ( 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 7 8 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR J Volume, v (vph) 53 14 26 I 11 Capacity, cm (vph) 1103 882 214 215 v/c ratio 0.05 0.02 I ( 0.12 0.05 Queue length (95%) 0.15 0.05 0.41 0.16 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 9.1 24.1 I 22.6 LOS A A I C C Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- I 24.1 22.6 Approach LOS -- -- I C C HCS2000TN1 Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background Traffic PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 L T R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 14 I 495 I 13 I 17 I 690 I 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 14 I 521 I 13 I 17 I 726 I 7 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 13 13 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 I 0 Configuration LTR LTR I Upstream Signal I I 0 I I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 i 10 I 11 I 12 L I T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 14 I 2 16 I 9 I 1 I 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 14 2 16 9 I 1 I 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I I N I I I N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 I RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay,Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB I WB I Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, v(vph) 14 17 32 15 I Capacity, cm (vph) 824 980 210 164 v/c ratio 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.09 I Queue length (95%) 0.05 0.05 I 0.53 0.30 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 8.7 I 25.2 I 29.1 LOS A A D I ( D Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 25.2 29.1 Approach LOS -- -- D D HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road INorth/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 2 I 3 4 5 I 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 51 615 13 I 14 I 340 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 53 647 13 14 I 357 I 47 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 12 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? 0 I I 0 Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration L TR L I I TR Upstream Signal 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 13 I 3 I 10 I 6 I 1 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 13 3 10 6 I 1 I 4 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I I N I I I N Storage 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration LTR I LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L I L I LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 53 I 14 26 I 11 Capacity, cm (vph) 1103 882 372 392 v/c ratio 0.05 0.02 0.07 I I I 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.15 0.05 0.22 I 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 9.1 I 15.4 14.4 LOS A A I I C I I I B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.4 I 14.4 Approach LOS -- -- C B HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d um TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Informat on: ,,,„ p.. . �. ' Site Information y,?,,;::, m ` Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street j Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 I 6 L T I R L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 14 I 495 13 17 690 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 14 521 13 17 726 I 7 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 13 13 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 1 1 0 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration L TR L I I TR Upstream Signal I 0 I I 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 8 I 9 10 I 11 I 12 L T R I L T R Volume (veh/h) I 14 2 I 16 9 1 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 14 2 16 9 1 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage I ( 0 I I 0 I RT Channelized? I ( I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I I LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration L L I I LTR I I I LTR Volume, v (vph) 14 17 I I 32 15 Capacity, cm (vph) 824 980 397 342 v/c ratio 0.02 0.02 0.08 I I 0.04 Queue length (95%) 0.05 0.05 0.26 I I 0.14 I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 I 8.7 14.9 I 16.0 LOS A A I I B C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 14.9 I 16.0 I Approach LOS -- -- B C I HCS_0007"t Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 I 2 I 3 4 I 5 6 L I T I R L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 51 I 627 14 17 360 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 53 I 660 14 17 I 378 47 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 12 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR LTR I I Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 L T j R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 16 3 I 13 6 I 1 I 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 16 3 13 6 1 4 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage I I 0 I I ( 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 I 0 I 1 0 Configuration ( LTR I I LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB j WB I Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 I 7 I 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR j LTR I LTR I I LTR I Volume, v (vph) 53 17 32 I I I 11 I Capacity, cm (vph) 1083 872 205 200 v/c ratio 0.05 0.02 0.16 0.05 Queue length (95%) 0.15 j 0.06 0.54 0.17 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 9.2 25.8 I 24.0 "" LOS A A D C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 25.8 24.0 Approach LOS -- -- D C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information, Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total Traffic PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ( 4 5 6 L I T R L I T R Volume (veh/h) I 14 I 518 16 21 I 707 I 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 14 I 545 I 16 I 22 I 744 I 7 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 13 13 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 I 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal I I 0 I 0 I Minor Street Northbound ( Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 17 I 2 I 19 I 9 I 1 I 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 17 2 ( 20 9 I 1 I 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade ()/o) I 0 0 Flared approach I I N I I N Storage ( I 0 ( I 0 RT Channelized? l l l 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 I 0 Configuration ( ( LTR ( LTR I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB ( Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 ( 8 9 10 ( 11 I 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR I Volume, v (vph) ( 14 I 22 I [ 39 I I 15 Capacity, cm (vph) 811 958 197 149 v/c ratio 0.02 0.02 0.20 0.10 Queue length (95%) 0.05 0.07 I 0.71 I 0.33 Control Delay (s/veh) I 9.5 8.8 II 27.7 31.8 LOS I A I A I I D I I D I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 27.7 31.8 I Approach LOS -- -- I D D I HCS2000Tm Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information 1Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 L I T R L I T R Volume (veh/h) 51 627 14 17 360 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 53 660 14 I 17 378 47 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 12 12 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I 0 I 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration L TR L I I TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 8 I 9 10 11 12 L I T R L ( T R Volume (veh/h) I 16 I 3 13 6 1 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 16 3 13 6 1 4 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I N I ( N Storage I 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR ] LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR I I LTR Volume, v (vph) 53 17 I 32 I I I 11 I Capacity, cm (vph) 1083 872 365 379 v/c ratio 0.05 0.02 ( 0.09 I i 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.15 0.06 0.29 I 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) I 8.5 9.2 15.8 I I 14.8 J LOS A A C I B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.8 14.8 I Approach LOS -- I -- I C I B J HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d ow TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street j Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) I 14 518 16 21 707 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) 14 545 16 I 22 I 744 I 7 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 13 13 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I 0 I 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 I 1 0 Configuration L _ TR I L I TR Upstream Signal 0 I 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 17 2 19 9 1 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 17 2 20 9 I 1 I 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 ( 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach ( EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement ( 1 4 l 7 I 8 9 I 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration ( L L I I LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 14 22 I 39 I 15 Capacity, cm (vph) 811 958 384 326 J v/c ratio 0.02 0.02 0.10 I I 0.05 Queue length (95%) 0.05 0.07 0.34 I 0.14 _I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.5 8.8 15.4 16.6 LOS A A l C L l I C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.4 16.6 Approach LOS -- -- C C /yCg2000t N1 Copyright m 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road (North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 ' 2 ' 3 I 4 I 5 ' 6 L T ' R L ' T ' R Volume (veh/h) 51 875 13 14 I 535 ' 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 53 921 13 14 563 47 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 12 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 ( 0 I 1 ' 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 I 0 Minor Street ' Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 ' 9 10 11 ' 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 11 I 3 10 6 1 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 ' 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 11 3 10 6 1 4 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 I 0 Flared approach I I N I I N Storage I I 0 I_ 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 ' 0 I 1 0 Configuration I LTR ' I LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement I 1 4 7 8 I 9 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration LTR I LTR LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 53 14 24 I I 11 I j Capacity, cm (vph) 922 • 694 106 I I 99 v/c ratio 0.06 0.02 0.23 0.11 Queue length (95%) 0.18 0.06 0.81 j 0.36 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 10.3 48.6 I 45.9 LOS A B E I E Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 48.6 45.9 Approach LOS -- -- E E HCS2000T``t Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 I 3 4 I 5 1 6 L I T I R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) I 14 I 695 ( 13 17 920 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 14 731 13 17 I 968 I 7 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 13 13 Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 J 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 L T R I L T I R Volume (veh/h) 12 I 2 16 9 I 1 ( 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 12 2 16 I 9 I 1 I 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage I 0 I 0 I RT Channelized? I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I LTR Control Delay,Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement ( 1 4 I 7 I 8 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration I LTR LTR I LTR I I LTR I Volume, v (vph) ] 14 17 I_ 30 I I 15 I Capacity, cm (vph) 665 816 114 ( I 81 v/c ratio 0.02 0.02 0.26 I I 0.19 I Queue length (95%) 0.06 0.06 I I 0.98 I I I 0.63 Control Delay(s/veh) 10.5 9.5 I 47.5 I I I 59.3 I LOS B A I E I I I F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 47.5 59.3 Approach LOS -- -- E F HCS2000Tm Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound I Movement I 1 2 3 I 4 I 5 6 L T R L I T R Volume (veh/h) 51 875 13 14 535 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 53 921 13 14 I 563 I 47 I Proportion of heavy vehicles, P 12 12 PEN Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? 0 I I I 0 Lanes 1 1 0 I 1 I 1 0 Configuration L TR L I TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 ( 9 I 10 I 11 12 L T I R I L T I R Volume (veh/h) 11 L 3 10 I 6 I 1 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF [ 0.95 0.95 0.95 it 0.95 ( 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 11 3 10 6 1 I 4 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEN 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach I N I ( N Storage I I 0 I 0 I I RT Channelized? I 0 0 Lanes I 0 I 1 0 0 1 0 I Configuration I LTR LTR Control Delay,Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB I WB I Northbound I Southbound I Movement 1 4 7 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 12 I Lane Configuration L L I LTR I I I LTR I Volume, v (vph) 53 I 14 I 24 I I I 11 Capacity, cm (vph) 922 694 260 l 271 v/c ratio 0.06 0.02 0.09 0.04 I Queue length (95%) 0.18 0.06 0.30 I I 0.13 I I Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 10.3 20.2 I 18.8 I I LOS A B I C I C I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 20.2 18.8 Approach LOS -- -- C I C I HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Background PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 ( 6 L I T I R L T R Volume (veh/h) 14 I 695 13 I 17 920 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 14 I 731 I 13 17 968 7 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 13 13 Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L I TR I L I I TR Upstream Signal 0 I I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 L I T I R I L T I R Volume (veh/h) I 12 2 I _ 16 I 9 I 1 I 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 12 2 16 9 I 1 I 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, Pm/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach I N N Storage I I 0 I I I 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 I 0 0 1 I 0 Configuration I I LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB I WB Northbound Southbound Movement I 1 4 ( 7 I 8 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration L L I I LTR I I LTR Volume, v (vph) 14 17 ( I 30 I I I 15 Capacity, cm (vph) 665 816 294 244 v/c ratio 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.06 Queue length (95%) 0.06 0.06 0.34 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.5 9.5 18.6 I 20.7 I LOS B A C I I I C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- I 18.6 I 20.7 I Approach LOS -- -- I C C (ICS_000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 - Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 2 I 3 4 I 5 6 L T I R L I T I R Volume (veh/h) 50 885 15 20 555 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 52 I 931 15 I 21 I 584 47 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH 12 --1PER/ Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 I 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I I LTR Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement _ 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 L I T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 15 I 5 ( 15 5 I 5 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 15 5 15 I 5 I 5 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach N I N Storage I I 0 ( 0 RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration LTR I LTR I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 4 7 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration LTR I LTR I LTR I I I LTR Volume, v (vph) ( 52 21 I 35 I I ( 15 Capacity, cm (vph) 905 686 98 93 v/c ratio 0.06 0.03 I 0.36 I I 0.16 Queue length (95%) 0.18 0.09 1.41 I I I 0.55 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 10.4 60.9 I I 51.0 I LOS A B I t F I I I F I I Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 60.9 51.0 I Approach LOS -- I -- F F HCS2000'M Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: no improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement ' 1 2 I 3 4 I 5 6 L ' T I R L ' T ' R Volume (veh/h) ' 15 I 720 ' 15 ' 20 ' 935 I 10 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 ( 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) ' 15 I 757 I 15 21 ' 984 I 10 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 13 13 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? I I 0 ' I I 0 Lanes 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration LTR I I LTR Upstream Signal I I 0 ' 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 9 10 I 11 I 12 L T R ( L I T I R Volume (veh/h) I 15 5 I 20 I 10 I 5 I_ 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 ' 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 15 5 21 10 I 5 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach I I N I N Storage I 0 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I LTR I Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach ( EB I WB Northbound Southbound Movement ( 1 4 I 7 ( 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration LTR ( LTR LTR I I LTR Volume, v (vph) 15 21 I I 41 I ( I 20 I I Capacity, cm (vph) 654 796 100 68 v/c ratio 0.02 0.03 0.41 I 0.29 Queue length (95%) I 0.07 I 0.08 I 1.70 ( l I 1.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.6 9.6 64.0 I 78.6 LOS B A I F F J Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 64.0 78.6 I Approach LOS -- -- F F HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total AM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 I 3 4 5 I 6 L T Volume (veh/h) I 50 885 I 15 R 20 5 5 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 52 I 931 I 15 21 I 584 I 47 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 12 12 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? 0 I I 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 I 0 Configuration L TR L I I TR Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 ( 10 I 11 I 12 L I T I R I L I T I R Volume (veh/h) ( 15 I 5 15 I 5 I 5 I 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 0.95 i 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 15 5 15 I 5 I 5 I 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach N N I Storage I 0 I I 0 I I RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 I 0 I 1 I 0 Configuration I LTR I I I LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach I EB WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration L L I LTR I I LTR Volume, v (vph) 52 21 I I 35 I I 15 I Capacity, cm (vph) 905 686 254 261 v/c ratio 0.06 0.03 I I 0.14 I I I 0.06 I Queue length (95%) 0.18 0.09 I I 0.47 I I 0.18 l Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 10.4 ( 21.4 I I I 19.6 I LOS A B I C I I C Approach delay (s/veh) -- I -- I 21.4 19.6 Approach LOS -- -- C C u. HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id ow TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Intersection Frontage/Forest Road Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Town of Vail Date Performed 6/10/04 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period Total PM Project Description 067867001 -Lionshead Redevelopment: with improvements East/West Street: South Frontage Road North/South Street: Forest Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I 4 I T I R 6 L T Volume (veh/h) I 15 I 720 I 15 20 I 935 I 10 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) ( 15 I 757 I 15 I 21 I 984 I 10 J Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 13 13 Median type I Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 I 1 I 1 I 0 Configuration L TR L I I TR Upstream Signal 0 I I 0 I Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I 8 I 9 10 I 11 I 12 L T R I L T I R Volume (veh/h) 15 5 I 20 10 5 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 I 0.95 I 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 15 5 21 10 5 5 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) I 0 I 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? I I I 0 I I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR I LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound I Southbound Movement I 1 4 I 7 ( 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L I L I LTR I LTR Volume, v (vph) I 15 21 I I 41 I I I 20 Capacity, cm (vph) 654 796 I 278 230 v/c ratio 0.02 0.03 I 0.15 I 0.09 Queue length (95%) 0.07 0.08 0.51 I I I 0.28 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.6 9.6 20.2 I I 22.1 LOS B I A C C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- I 20.2 22.1 Approach LOS -- -- C C HCS2000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d