HomeMy WebLinkAbout770 Potato Patch #17 21010631903175 South Frontage Road
VaiL Colorado 81657
303479-2 I 07 / FAX 3O347r2 I 57
Ofice of Town AttorneY
November 4, 1993
l[r. Raymond L Petroo, Jr.
Holme Roberts & Owen, Attorneys at Law
1700 Lincoln, Suit€ 4100
f)enrrcr, Colorado 8(}20t1
Dear Ray:
As I inalicated to 5l9u in a tclephone convergation, I have discussed the restdctions on Unit
ti,ZZOPotato P;tch Ihive wiih Kristan Pritz of our Conmunity Dwelopnent Departnent'
Due to the circumgtances oncerning the use restrictions on the unit by Vail Ordinance No.
39, Series of 1981, we would be wiIing to work with vou if vgu hail { !P!9{u1ity to
il.hr* th" caretatefs unit which ig now being offered for eale Uf F" FDIC. The Town'B-agreenent to l€move the restriction conveyanq would be conditioned upon
fia"i"S an appmpriate regtrictiou on the unit pursuant to the Tova-'s Employee Housing
i-Srlitio". Thj" i5e Fstriction would oemanentlv reetrict the unit as an employee-houaing
.to]t "" defiaed in the houeing ordinanae" I haoe enclosed a @py of the Town's ordinances
i! that regard for your consideration.
If you have any questione or comnents, please feel ft'ee to contact me'
Very truly yours,6^yi.*
R. Thomas Moorhead
Town Attomey
RTr\[/dal
Encloeure
i*ror", HousrNG'
Chepter 1857
EMPLOYEE HOUSING
Purpose.
Employee housing units (EHU) gener-
ally.
Applicability.
Type l-Employee housing unit.
Type tr-Employee housing unit.
Type Ill-Employee housing unit.
Type tV-Employee housing unit.
Type V-Employee housing unit.
Jo
Sections:
r8.57.0r0
18.57.020
1E.57.030
18.57.040
1E.57.050
1E.57.060
18.s7.070
1t.57.0E0
a
f 8.57.010 Purpoee.
The Town of Vail's econony is largcly tourist based and the
healtlr of this eoonomy is preni$ed m exemplary servicc forVail's
gucss. Vail's Ebility to providc such scwice is dcpcndent upon I
strong, high qualiry and consisteruly available work force. To
achieve such a work force, the cmmrmity must wort to provide
qualityliving ud worting cmditims. Availability of housing pays
a critical nle in crcating qualty tiviqg and wo*ing conditioru for
thc community's wort force. The town rccognizes a permanent,
ycar rcund population plays an imponant rclc in sustaining a
healthy, viable comnunity. Funher, the town rccognizes its role in
conjturction witr tbe prlate seoor in ensuing housing is available.
(Ord" 8(1992) $ 4 (pan).)
It.57.020 Employee housing unlts @HU) generally.
A. A chart2 ateched o this chapter md incorponted hercin by
rcfecncc illustratcs tbc rcgircmots foreach6pe of EHU.
B. No emplolae housing unit wNch is constructcd in accordance
with this chapter shall be suMivided or divided into any fom
of time sharts, inrcrval orvnoshipc, orfractional fec.
C. All t)?es of EHUs may be leased, but only to tenants who are
full-time employees who wo*in Ea$e County. An EHU shall
462a
(vril 9-29-92)
YEE HOUSING
K. Each EHU shall have a separate entrance and shall not be
corulecled in any way to any unit it may be anached to.
(ord. 8(1992) $ 4(pan).)
18.57.030 Applicability.
A. The requirements of this chapter shall be in addition to the
requircmenn set fonh in each zone disuict where EHUs are
permined by this chapter and all other requirements of the
Town of Vail Municipal Code.
B. Where the provisiors or requirements of this chapter conflict
with the provisions or-requirements set forth in any zone
disuict or any other rcquirements of the Town of Vail
Mnnicipal Code, the p'rovisions of this chapter shall conuol.
(Ord. 8(1992) $ 4(part).)
18.57.040 Type I-Employee Housing Unit.
A. Rrrpose. To allow for constnrction of an EI{U on lots in the
pdmary/secondary and two-family zone disuicts which do not
meet the minimun lot size rcquirements for said zorB disuic's.
B. Generd Conditioru. A Type-I EHU shall comply with the
following general prwisions:l. It shdl be a permined use in the primary/secondary
residentid, ard two-family residential zone districts.
2. It shall be allowed on a lot that is less than fifteen thousand
squarc feet in toal site arca.
3. It shall be one of the dwelling rnits in a nro-family
dwelling pursuant to Section 18.54.050 I design gddelines
duplex and primary/secondary development It may also be
Iocated in, or auached to, an existing garage provided the
garage is not located within any setback, and further
provided that no cxisting Parking requircd by the Town of
Vail Municipal Code is reduced oreliminated.4. It strall not exceed forty percent of ttre otal GRFA allowed
on the lot. An applicant, however, shall be permined m
apply to the Community Development Department 9f Oe
Town of Vail for additional GRFA not to exceed two
hundred fifty squarc feet to be used in tbe construction of
o
EMPI,O
462c (vdl 9-29-92)
o
EMPI-O
7.
8.
rE HOUSING
It shall be entitled to a GRFA crcdit of four hundred
twenty-five squan fcct, as sct forth in Scaions 18.12.090
A. urd 18.13.0E0 A. of this code.
If a Tlpe t EHU is sold separately from the nro-family
dwelling it is part of, then the ptovisions as set forth in
Section 1E.57.020 subections B, C and E as well as
Section 18.57.90 8,5 a" and b. shall be incorporated into
awittcn agrcementapplicable to botttthe Type I EHU and
the dwelling unito whictt it is anached in a fonn approved
by the town atomey whictt shall nn with the land and shall
notbe amended orterminarcd withoutthe written apprwal
of the Town of Vail. Said agreement shall bc rccorded at
the courty clcrt std tpcorder office prior o the issancc of
a building permitforbe constructim of an EHU.
Thirty days prior to the transfer of a deed for a Type I
EHU, fie perspcctive prnascr shall submit an application
to the community dwelopmot department documenting
tbat the prospective prchaser meets &e criaria set forth in
Scctions 18.57.020 C md 18.57.0'm B 5 a. and shall
include an affidavit affrrning that he or sbc meets these
qiteria"
(vril 9-29-92)
9.
L
c.Applicatioa Any penon wbo wishes to construct a Tlpe I
EHU sball submit an application for design review board
approvat b tte c@mtrtity dn elopent deparmern containing
6e following informaim:
f . itp name and mailing addrcss of the applicanr
2. Tbe wrircn consent of tb ownen of thc lot or Prcperty to
be includcd in drc applicuion or the wrincn consent of thcir
agcnt or arttrorizcd EPresentatives. For the purposes o!
this subeection, agcnt or arthorizcd rcPrcsentative shall
mean any individual or association authorized or
eorpowered in writing by the property owner to act on his
or her behalf. If any of the Prcperty to be included is a
condminiunized do,elopme.nt, the penircn condominium
association may be considercd the agent or authorized
rcpresentative fortlp individual tmit ownerif allowed by all
pertinent rcquiremurs of the condominium association's
declarations.
s.J,..i:
46?E
o
o EMPT-OEE HOUSING
It shall have a GRFA not less than thrce hundred square
feet" normorc than nine hundrcd squarc feet. An applicant'
however, shall be permiued to apply to Ote Commqruty
Development Deparunent of the Town of Vail foradditional
GRFA notto exCeed five hundred square feet to be used in
the construction of the EHU. The applicant strall submit an
application for the additional GRFA on a form provided by
thi community develoPment departrrent. Approval. or
denial of the riErest snan Ue made by the <leqigl review
board in accordance with Section 18.54.040. If an
applicant obtairu design rcview board apprwalj-o-rfive
triuirOrcO squarc fcet of additional GRFA for the EHU' he
or she shail not be entitled to receive additional GRFA
pursuant to Chapter 18.71 - Additional Gross Residential
iiloor Arca of this Code for either urit on the lot. If an
applicant obuins design review board approvd f9r no1
more ttran two hrndred frfty square feet of additional
GXFA for the EIIU, he or she shall be entitled !o rcceive
additional GRfA pursuant to Ctrapter 18.71 ' Additional
Gross Residential Floor Arca of this code for one dwelling
ruritonthe lot
It shaU have rptmorc than two bedrooms.
No morc than two adults urd one child not older than
sixteen years of age strall reside in a one bedroom Tpe II
EIIU. No more than two adtlts and trro children not older
than sixtecn yean of age shall reside in a two bedroom
T)'pe tr EHU.
Eiin fpe U EHU shall be rcquired to havc no less than
one pa-rking space for each bedroom located therein'
Howiver, if a-one bedroom Type II EHU exceeds six
hundred squar€ feet, it strall have nvo pa$ilg spaces. All
pa*ing qpic€s rcquircd by ttris co.l9 sl4l be located on the
iame t6t 6r Src u-Ure gfnf. If not dwelling exists upon the
prcperty which is proposed for a T1rye I EFU at the time a
buiiAin! permit isissued, orif ur existin-g.dwelling is q b'
demoliihed urd replaced by a new dwelling, not less than
one of the parking qpaces rcquircd by this subseaion shall
be enclosei. a Uriee-nundrcd squarc feet GRFA crcdit sha[
5.
(
6.
7.
8.
vii::l
C'4629
Oril9-29-92)
t, j!:t:jt}t?f T."i*''Sf;:f i:.Sn..fitTr
o o
EMPL
9.
OYEE HOUSING
It shall not be entitled to additional GRFA in accordance
with Chapter l8.?I-Additional Gross Residential Floor
Area-
GRFA shall bc determined as set forth in Section
1E,04.130 B. of this code.
A T1pe m EHU may be Ented in comfliancc with seaion
18.57.020 or it may be sold, transferrcd, or conveyed
separaEly from other dwelling units or employee housinguir thatmay be locahd on the same lotorwithin the same
building in whictrthe Type III EIIU is locared so long as ir
mees &e following conditions:t. It must be used by the owner of the EHU as a
permanent rcsidence. For the purpose of this
paragraph, a permanent rcsidcnce shall mean ttp home.
orplace in which orrc's habitation is fixed urd to which
one, whsneyer he or she is absent, has a prcsent
intention of rctuming after a deparnrre or absence
therefirom, rcgardless of the duration of absence. In
dercrmining what is a perman€nt rpsidence, ttre own
statrslull tale thc following circun$arpes relating to
the owner of the rcsidence into account: business
prsuits, cmplolment, income s(rulccs, rcsidencc for
income or other tax purposes, age, martial status,
rcsidencc of parcnts, spouse and c,hildrcn if any;
location of personal and rpal propcrty, and motor
vdriclercgistruim"b. If a Tlpe UI EIIU is sold, transferred, or conveyed
segararty tom thc otherdwellingunia and/orT)"e III
employee houing units in a multifarnily stnrchrc it is a
part of, or from other dwelling unis and/or Tpe III
EHUs locarcd on the same lot, ttre Type III EHUs in
the structurc or on that lot shall be n$ject to all the
provisioru set forth in Section 18.57.@0 F, G, H and
Kof this ctraptcr.
If a Tlpe IU EHU is sold separatdy ftom other dwelling
units and/or Tlpe III cmployee housing units in a
multifamily structurc it is a part of, or ftom ottrcr dwelling
rurits and/or T!"e UI EHUs located on tbe same lot, the
provisions as set forth in Section 18.5?.020 sbsections B,
(vril 9-29-92)
t0.
ll.
(-
6A
n EMPLOTEHOUSING
4. It shall have a GRFA of not less than two hundred squarc
feet and not morc ttranthrce hundrcd squars feet andihall
include a bathrmm and akitchenettc as defined in Chapter
l8.O{ - Detuiitions of the Vail Municipal Code.5. Eachbuilding which conuins aType MHU shall contain
a stonge locker not less than five feet width x six feet
height x five feet lengttr (one hundred fifty cubic feet) in
size for eachTlpe MHU contained therein, and not less
than one washer and dryer for common use by each eight
EHUs located therein. In no event shall less than one
washer and dryer be provided in a building with less than
eiglrt EHUs.6. No morc than one person drall rcside in a Tlpe MHU.7. It shall be rcquired to have one parking space. Guest.
parking requirerdenu shall be determined by the planning
utd environmental commission in accordance with the
conditional use permit review process set forth in Section
18.60.060 Criteria - Findings.8. It sha[ not be entitled to additional GRFA under Chaprcr
18.71 - Additional Gross Rcsidential Floor Arca.9. GRFA shall be determined as set forth in Section
18.04.130 B. of this code.
(Ord. 8(1992) $ 4(part).)
1t.57.0t0 Type V - Employee houslng unit.
A. Purpose. To allow for construction of an EHU on los in the
hillside rcsidential zone disuicl
B. Gcneral conditions. A tlpc V EHU shall comply with the
following general provisions:l. It sha[ be a permined use in the hillside residential zone
district2. It shall be one of the dwelling units in a two-family
dwelling pursuant to Section 18.54.050 I. design
guidelines duplex and primary/secondary developmenr. It
may dso be located in, or asached !o, an existing garage
provided the garage is not locarcd within any setback, and
further provided that no existing pa*ing required by the
6?k
(Vril 9.29.92)
p
Eq'
E
E:tct
E(,
6oCLlt
o
xo
0'ooo
E
-co-
o
€go
{J
ciat
ro(\lt
oooc)
O EEg
5 gr*s
.>
Ft4
=€EE>o
.>
Ega: !t=o
=6
d
d'
ro(\lrt
rl0
FEE
.-(,lb8o(l'-"8AB 8+lO @-
EF
9E
EF
:.E
Into-o , $s€
E9.r
9Fc =tlt :']L tll-
Eo.cooE6 ==tl-
EETL z
c149
=!tEG6C)
Gt (\l ((0 F z
!EaL sz (\l (ct sz
3E
FEE
tntro
o
uJc
o
UJL
ollj&
.D
cco
o.
EgogE.,
6E
EeE
E€E oz at(D oz oz
ctroN
oo o
E oz oz v,o
0E.9(,<E
=dtEOcrtr
@t€o
fEfr+EO
d
attooct)ooc,
IE
cia,ooo)olO$
rE
dU'oo
CD6o(\l
sJ
vtooC\
o
ai
ESE o qo u?o
(It
c{ttt)c;o
flFr
EC'€o
a8-(l) lf,JF
eOEO-o.E rdcf5a {z z
ooo
ol
st)EO3?
E€gF 6.9rV6<
E(Etl.o
Fad
.>
= nFE
E.,s,F t
gBFI
*EgH,
gE*6s
EEcH,
BE$6$
(6F^c!popp
-9t o
=0,-tr
rO
=*IIJ F $
=oo
F
oo
F
zoCL
F
8.
E
3;
o$qt\q
@
oroct\q
@
o(Oq
Nq
oo
oF-qt-lO
oo
o@q
Nu?o
N
({
(.1\o*
e.l\ov
z
(Apo
r-l IFrjt<J ux? d9
t- H()
F <tI RoF?q FF.lalq6ZF{P
z
F
C)t{CA
14,RI
O'-fI
D=
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
3034792100
FAX 3034792157
ffice of the Mayor
December 13, 1991
Ms. NoeIIe Paiee Staab
FDIC StaffAttorney
Advi s oriesAlans actions
Federal Deposit Insura:rce Corporation
Legal Division
7W Llth Street, Suite 3000
Denver, Colorado 80202
Dear Ms. Staab:
In your letter to the Vail Town Council of November 15, 1991, you alEue that certain
,"ri.i.tioot piaced. on Unit 17, 770 Potato Patch Drive by Town of V-{l Ordinance No' 39'
Series of 19ti1, limiting the uait for use as a caretake/s unit are invalid, and that the Town
should remove the restrictions in order to allow the FDIC to sell unit 17.
The Tow:r's r€sponse is as follows:
1) ordinaace No. 39, series of 1981, is a valid legislative enactment of the Town
of Vail. The ordinaace prohibits the conveyance and the leasing or renting of
the unit for a period ofless than thirty (30) consecutive days, and requires that
tJre unit be rented only to tenaots who are full time employees in the Upper
Eagle Valley. It is th; Town of Vail's position that any conveyance or rental
which viohLs the term of the ordiaance is iavalid. This unit represented
additiona,l density added to the 770 PotatoPatch condomini"- comple& whid
never would have been gfanted ifthe unit were uot restricted as an employee
housing unit.
2) You argue in your letter that the FDIC should be permitted to disregard the
restriciions because no covenants containing the restrictions were filed on the
land records of Eagle County. Under Colorado law, the recordation of a zoning
ordinance is not-necessary to provide constructive notice to subsequent
purchasers, such as the FDtb in tlis instance. Colorado case law provides that
a "oning amsarlmsll is a legislative enactment, and as such does not need to
"o
Ms. Noelle Paige Staab
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
December 13, 1991
Page 2
comply with Colorado recordiag acts. the goals of the Colorado rcgeldingstatute are satisfied tbrough the zoning approval process. consequently, theFDIC had record notice of the restricbions of Ordinance No. 39. In addition,the condominium map for 770 Potato patch Drive which was siped a-ud
accepted by the owaer of the property, and which is recorded on the land' records of Eagle County desipates the "nit as a caretakey's rrnif. Finally, as
can be seen from the enclosed correspondence, the FDIC has been notified by
the Town of Vail on severa.I occasions of the restrictions contained in Ordi:rance
No. 89.
3) You note in your letter that the Silverado Llvestment Company was the owner
of record and had been paying property taxes on ;ls rrnif. Ho*ever, in a lettcr
dated September 27, 198g, a copy of which is enclosed, the Eagle Couaty
Assessor verified that the caretaler's rrnif, st TTOPotato Patch Drive has beenconsidered part of the general conrmon elements and not assessed as a
separate unit. Apparently, the unit was assessed as a separate "nit for thefirst time in 1990.
The Town Council of the Town ofVaij understaads that the FDIC has a duty to liquidate theassets of the Siiverado Investment Compaay which are presently ia reieivership.
Nevertheless, the Town must insist that ia the process of liquidaiion, the Towa's gldinanais
are not violated. The Town, however, would be happy to discuss with the FDIC some solutionwhich would result in some solution which would be acceptabie to the FDIC, but wouldmaintain the integrity of the Town's ordinance.
Very truly yours,
7r*r--" a MF-
Margaret A. Osterfoss
Mayor
l,AE/dd
Raym.ond L. Petros, Jr.
FDIC
Federal Deposlt Ingurance Coryorellon
L"i-Jiiwl"i.diqiti11,s11p..1;9uite-3000,o€nver,coloradoa)202
. ^^S\ RB! Nov 2 o lselftm
ISIN$\'a
'
oenyerconsottdat€dofiicetgob2sazc. ro,(30O#s9
llovember l5' l99l
Vail Torm Council
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Co]orado 80657
Re: 7590 - Silverado Banking, Savings and Loan Association
DenYer, C0 - In ReceivershiP
llatter No.: A1517
Asset No.: 28198
Lamis No.: 000157001
Dear Council . ltlembers:
Asyoumayknow,onDecemberg,lgsS'theFederalDeoositlnsurance
Corporation ("FDIC') was appointed receivei-iir litveraOo Banking, Savings and
Loan Association. At that time Si'l veraOo investment Company. was a who'l ly owned
subsidiary of Sttverido fiatifiing. ffre ais.is of Silverido Investment Company'
inc'f uding 770 Potato-P;t.h d;i-*, #!7,.-V-;ii, tolorado, are being 'liquidated'
iiii;-ilii is sometiri.i "irlirrea tb as itre "caretaker's unit"
0n January lT, lggl, Kristan lli!t, Connnunity Developm^ent Director for the
Town of Vait, sent . i6iii"-ii-it'e rOIC.'iniiletier citeiordinance 39' Series
of 1981, and stateO Jfrit the unit couii'not be sold bJ the "Condominium
Association" until the Ordinance expires-. According. to the Ordinance' this was'
at a minimum, 2l yeir's;;;y."-ifi'iluld'b;'-noted itrat on January 17, l99l the
"Condominium Rssocitio# tii-a not own ttt" *if nor was the unit a common element
of the comp'lex. SifveriOolhviitmeni Compiny was the ownet of record' Further'
it had been payins p;;il;;y';il;;,'Fi L" iJi'"ssrent on the unit. Nothins in the
Dectaration wouto iniii;{; iili the untiJi i common element of the propertv'
The 0rdinance states "ft@tinq: a' that the
employee housing unif sr,aii ;in- "" and b' that
the,,employee housini rinit iri"fi not b6 i;;;;e-;;-;"nt.O roi-tlv period. of,less
iil;. iili;ii-r36'i-..:'i.y;.nd,'ir'if.srrari-ue rented, it shall be rented onlv to
tenants who are tufi liile empio'..s in the Upper Eagie V.ll:.y.] Upon our review
of the file, we ..nnoi"'itlJ-rtiin wtro tt1e. applican[ may ha-ve been; however' no
aqreement was found in writing which could be construe!.as 1n aoreement to limit
tfie ability to sel'l or'otr'Lilii"t..ont.y ii,-.--pt9i,-,i1iqt .fh-i"efore-, it is difficult
io ascertain any reitrictions by virtue of the Ordinance'
Apparently,0rdinance3gwasPlssedandorderedpublishedbytitleonlyon
November 3, 1981. 'i;"il;r*il;'oit-tre-ieal estate'records, Y{e can find no
indication which unit iiieiignlted as"ihe-emp1oyee housino unit' Further' a
recent tiile commitment received by ilre ib-ri'ii'on'J ng Declaiation of covenants
lni-iiitiiiiiioni tiili"i;!;ii;dfiti nniltr timits the abilitv of the owner to
sell or otherwise convey this unit, despite Paragrap.h-5'd'..of.the ordinance which
provides that the ffiiiit't- tlail -ag-r;;'in--wiiting tttat a Declaration of
Covenants and Restriidions shall be filed of record in a form approved Ut !!:ir-."itiJr.Jv iJr ir,. b'.,i;;it ;f the town. Therefore, anv such covenant cannot
be construed- to run with the land.
Fjna]ly,the0rdinancewasnotrecordedinthe-real.propertyrecordsof
Eagle County until n6tii''6it-iZ,lgeg. nt ttrat time, Silverad6 Investment Company
owned the unit and .eriiinrr; riad not tgrtto io ltre restrictions included in the
0rdinance. For these reasons and others, iu.ftli ttr. right aoainst unreasonable
restraints on atienation of property, iT"ii- iiiJ rOiC's'oosition that the
proh.ibition of sate iii'i6"tf, i; tf'e Oiainance'woufA not be upheld bv the courts'
Because the FDIC has a duty to liquidate the as-sets of the Receivership'
we must take imrrediate action to do so. i;';;;.;;iteteptrone conversation I had
with Larry Eskwith, iown of Vail Attorngi; h" itateO that- he has no authority to
;;-;.i-;;y lorpromir.'ii'.'o"Ainance ano-iugsested that I write to vou'
Please contact me no later than December 15, l99l r.esard.ing-how y9u wou].d
propose to resolve ir,i'i iiitili-in order'io'meet-our mutual-obiectives. If we do
not hear from you we will be forced to iri:t:r-. il; i;g.j remiedies in order to
liquidate tnis assei. 'iiu tiy contact *'ili'.itii at (303) 296-4703' Ext' 3773
or at the address indicated in the tetteitreiO. If-I may answer any questions for
;ili. th; j"terim,JiJise]et ne know. I look forward to vour response.
Vai'l Town Council
Potato Patch Unit #17/31
November 14, l99l
Page 2
NPS: cz
Encl osure
Larry Eskwith,
Linda Preston,
SincerelY'
TDI aff AttorneY
Advi sori es/Transacti ons
Esqui re
Account 0fficercc:
SENT BYI
. ||lrroE Xfra Eria ia!6b|rebic!ebdm
t{r EI l|lA lth h.rA! Lf. cls lrr! tt|'f
&y6lLfru'J!
Anonoyr c lrn'
r|LSlfil&!eb
Drlrr' |r.t'Fro 1016
tl$onOm)ldffiUcOhs.odt{r al{ao
DeaF l,Ir.ls,
Aaeocla
reEPOnBe
FDrC toI an llrrLtof a cond
Conitontnl
FDTC Iu{th
PDIC har,tcqucsted thc Tosfl for relicf frmOrdlnancel{o. 39,- acriec-of 1981, }thtan regtrlcts-tue-iare anou8a of
3 Eoard. of the 7?o potato patch Drlve condonlnfus, rge. hae aekad u. to rrLt. ttrtr icttcr to you ln
'1-litl1r: i1!:d,I-'q!:_r ls_, rsel,, wrlitrn [y ur-vl.rl lswn councit. lrtlo"si. r-il'u-;;;ii"Ei, -'-thlr _ letter aE r Denber oi ure poira-ana-ln'l*""nlun in 770 potato Eatoh.
caretaksrrs unlt at ziO potato fatch. TtreAgesslatlon dlsputes certaln cii[eientl--in tJret lnd the Aaeoaiatlon wlehee to furnleb the TownLnfonatien whlch wc leitsve woufa-le LelDfirl lnpthd conel tlon of thle natter.
not tothe To$'n,ure and
coEECnt! to glre FDIC letter are ag folloret
Inv6untt.
he Condol[lniu! A8Eoctatlon urEcE thc llor'lil Cotucllcin<l Ordlnanoc t|o. 39 at thlr tlur. I{r alro invitccooprretlon tn helFing to iaetrion a eoLuCion {o tUearahlp of the aareiax6ris GlE.--' -
Otarerehl.u. lhe IDIC, aE succaseor to gllverad,oL;oEpanyr -olatbB tg be ttre o$Irer of the CaretakerrEconcsnlnlu! AsaocJ.ation, tro'livcr, ucifei:ii tr:it-ft
c-12-s1 i 1:02Pil ;
Holme Roberts & Owen
Dec6ilb€r 12, L991
Lavren6e altvtth, Eeg.Eown Alosn of V75 g.Road
81657VaiI, Col
! Covcnants
?70 potatoon Caretalcsars Unl,tPatcb Drlve Condonlnlune
303479215?if, 2
L'
ttt'rOEC 121991
D:|t;? I*d{,.d c|iil
||Jr S!0 lI n*La ,'|!-bdx.d. Cdqdo l}lt
td aEtoHha|st'OdrF0f
SENT BY:
512-e1
;1:02Pri o 3034?9215?;f, 3
1r tlre tclal own€r of the caratakcrre unlt. rn thleregard, r
FebmarT
direct your attentlon to the Xetter dat6d
Itwr€nce
Dgc€nbar
Page 2
to thcCondonlnlneant toconclonlniBook 3!0r
onunlt.the
3uPloy.cthC FDICCond,oulntIn even
Dot havdand thatthe
dealgrnawag 3
refcrs tothoLettareJanuary Irepeatedllfo. 39.
thlg caIctt6r1989, totlre Eaglato be
authority
dlaputc.
th,EFg.
, 1991
e B comon elcuent for the beneflt of ttre
n any
E swners. 'llhe condomlniuo D!p, faool3ded atPage 903, SaEls County Clar,c and Reeorder'a Offica,23, 1982, daelgnates thls unlt as a caretakrrrsnancB No. 39 evldencge tlrle lntent by statlng In
'I|hcrcaar clausc that, thlg erGra unlt would be
.to 'ebl,Ioyee houaing uB6 as r caretaker facllltyr,lngly, Prohlblta lts eale and rcetrlcte ite use to
NotLca of covenant. Tbe IDIC alalnr that tt dldof ttre reetrictiong contal.ned ln tbi covcnant,event, no agreeoent wac executed to gffectuata
Housvsr, ae diecueaed previouely, thle unlt lE
ouring. D*pitr our rrprrtrd Erque3ts to neet wltlro laaolve thie el.tuation, the IDIC has !6buffcd th.n AEeoctation. fn faot, we have been uneuoeegefulentifying an lndlvlduEl'within ttre IDIC who baato negotlate wlth ur ln an attenpt to resolve tb.ie
' 1990' frm tbc Acgoclatlon's attoErey, ur. Poat,Cr asaertlltg lhe clalu by the AaaoclatLon. Ehcn Aegocl,etlon bellaves that th€ carstakcrrs unit raa
EecondIy,8ilverado
aE a carBtak€rrs unLt ln the condonlnlum nap, whlcband accepted by tha ocncr ot tlre property.the l€EaI deaeription Ln the attaohed dcad toInveEtsent eonpany, dated lprll L2, L985, explieitlythir unlt ar thc tcaretak3r unitr' rnd rafsrtncasu! map. Finally, aa evidensad by thc attachcalthe Town of Vall dated Novenber 61 1985 and, 1991, to the FDfe or lts agant, tha FDIC has betnadvleed by th6 Tom of, thc oxlBtcnce of Ordlnance
Tares. the FDIC clai.ug to have pald taxee onunlt. Hoyever, accordlng to the attachedEaqle County ABEsBsor, dated Eepteuber 2the Eagle County ABEsBsotr,Eepteuber 2?,Board nenber of tbe Condoulnlun AeasciatlonrCounty AEeesaor hsd coneldered ttre caretaker,g unl,tof the genoral connon clruentc and had not aeeeasedItaaite unit through 1989. rhc FDIC haa latled topay the taxee toE 1990, rtt€n thla unlt was llretcaparatelasseEBed (apparently at the requeat of the FDIC).
SENT BY:r5?-s1 ;1;03PM;o
ttr,Esq.
, 1991
oi tuiE unft i'lll-De ae a clretaker'e unLt forof thc ??O Potato Patch condloulnl'un owncrE.
caae do not heeltate to contlct us lf, you rcqulreintorlatlon.
l{r. Borir MouiroffUs. fngrld L. R€gall{r. }lark uattheweHs. Noelle PaEa 8taab, rDIC 6tatt Attornaytle. Llnda Preiton, FDIC Account of,tla.rllllllan ,t. Po8t, 8Eq.
3034?8215?;f, 4
Lsrence
Dec€Dber
Page 3
several
Tgwnat thielntrnCadtbe benef
addl
RLFreavcci (tt/
conelualonr vs belleve llre FDIC letter eontal'naccurac:[t!. Ehe Condouinfun Alloclatlon urgc! th3lI not to taki any iction to reeolnd thle ordlnanee
ne and to talce aDiroprlate stslta to- cneure !fa! the
8ic'!oEc 10 t991
EAGLE COUNTY ASSESSOR
P. O. Box 449
Eagle, Colorado 81631
(303) 328-7311
Septeml)er 27, 1989
l4s, lng,rid P.egal
?70 Potato Patch DriveVail, C0 8155?
RI''lr Caretaker I s Un'l t
7?O Potato Fatch Drivc Condorninlums
Deal Ms. Rogal t
This lcttcr is to venifY
Caretaket.r s Uult ol 7?0in Book 350 Pagc 903 of
bccrr cons ld.tY'od l\ar! of
as a seFar'ate unlt.
EAGT,E COUNTY ASSESSOR
GJO/ jmt
tlrat our iecordc currently reflect that the
Potato Patch Drlve condomlnlums os recorded
Eaglo Cortnty necords on December 23r l9B2 lras
the generol cornmon olements and. not aEses:tcd
<.o o
75 soulh frontego road
vall, cotorado 91657
(303) 476-7000
November 6, 1986
olllce of communlty developmenl
).
Mr. Jim Flaum
High Country PnopertiesPost 0ffice Box 1027Vai1, Colorado 81658
Re: Sa] e of the 770 Potato patch caretaker,s unit
Dear Jim:
The Community Development Department is aware that High Country Properties is'l isting the 770 Potato Patch caretaker's unit for sale. I havl enciosed a copyof Ordinance #39, Series of'l 98l which requires that the employee housing unit-
Ir9! bg sold "for a period of not less than the life of rrent ttil1iam Ruder, a'life in being, plus twenty-one (zl) years from date that the certificate ofoccupancy is issued for said unit.,,
Thjs unit is restricted by ordinance and therefore is not to be so1 d until thistime peri od l. rp. The community Development Department is requiring that youdiscontinue listing this unit for sale. If you have any questions about thisrequirement, please feel free to calI me at 476-7000, ext I'l 'l .
Si ncerel y,
Ki'[,^flh
Kri stan Pritz
Town Pl anner
KP:br
cc: 770 Potato Patch Condo Assn.
,/.2../'
O-', ;-'.
75 south lrontage road oflice ol community developmentvail, colorado 816S7
(303) 47$2138
(303) 479-2139
January 17, 199L
Mr. Dale Holaday
FDIC
1125 17th St Suite 7OoDenver, CO 80202
RE: 770 Potato patch Employee/Caretaker unit
Dear Mr. Holaday:
Attached please find a copy of the ordinance 39 series of 1_981,which sets the standards ior the employee housing unit lccated inthe 770 Potato Patch developrnent. ihe-orcinance stipul-ates insection 1.5 that the unit sha11 not be sol,d.for a plrica of notI'ess than the life of rrent williarn Ruder, a Life in bei.ng zryears (21) fron the date that the certificate of occupanct isissued for sai.d unit.t' The ordinance goes on to further statethat if the unit is rented or leased that it shalr not be for aperiod of not less than 30 consecutive days and that it nust berented to a fulI-tine enrployee of the upper Eagte vaLrey. rnaddition, the ordinance ieslricts tne unit fro; beinc dividedinto any forin of timeshares, intervar. ownershio or fiacti.cnaifee.
ft is the staffts opinion that the unit can not becondominium associ.ation until such tirne period asordinance has expired. If you have any questionsrequrrernent, please do not hesitate to cal_l- rne at
S incerely,
Kristan PritzCommunity Development Director
cc: Ma:k !,latthews, SJ.ifer ManagenentBill post i.,/
t,. I -
- r:'---
sold by theindicated byregarding this
lit>-zLJb.
"a
4 \;,-)-/.J-.''r, t'.')
'J
414163 B-517 F-991 l|/t7/Bg 14243 FG I DF J
JOHNNETTE F,HILLItrS EAGLE COUNTY CLERK, COLORADO
REC
15. oo
DOC
a. bo
to amend
wou'l d be
ORDI NAN CE # 39(Series of 1981)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE #30 OF1977; CHANGING THE IqAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DllrlELLINGUNITS ON LOT 6, BLOCK 2, POTATO PATCH, FROM A
MAXIMUM OF 3O UNIIS TO A MAXIMUM OF 31 DI"JELLINGUNITS; PROVIDING THAT ONE SUCH D|.lELLING UNIT BERESTRICTED TO AN EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT; SETTING
THE STANDARDS GOVERNING SUCH EMPLOYEE HOUSINGUNIT; SETTING THE PERMISSIBLE GROSS RESIDENTIALFL00R AREA ( "GRFA" ) F0R SAI D 3l UNITS; ANDPROVIDING DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO.
l{HEREAS, 0rdinance #30 of !977 zoned Lot 6, Block 2, Potato
Patch to a maximum of 30 dwel'li ng uni ts ; and
l'|HEREAS, the current owner of the property wishes
the allowable number of units to 30 plus l unit which
Town Counci I is of the opinion that this amendment
of protect'ing the health, safety and wel fare of
Lot 6, Block 2, Potato Patch shal I be zoned Medium DensitvMulti-Family (MDMF) with a maximum of 31 units with one uiritof the 31 whj ch shal I be restri cted to empl oyee housi ngaccording to the fo11ow'i ng restrictions:
That the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) of the sjteas determi ned by the Commun'i ty Devel opment Departmentunder MDMF zone standards not be exceeded on the si te.
That fifty percent of the required parking be enclosed.
The archi tectural des ignand colors must be visualof the site.
',.-\\tLl l '
,i
I'
restricted to employee housing use as a caretaker faci tity: and
!lHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commiss'ion has recom-
mended unanimous approval of thi s amendment; and
[.lHEREAS, the Town Council considers jt important to obtain
dwel I i ng uni ts restrj cted to empl oyee housi ng; and
l.lHEREAS, thE
'i s in the interest
the inhabitants of the Town of Vail;
NOH, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED 8Y THE TONN COUNCIL OF THE TOl^lN
OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Secti on I Exhibit A of 0rdjnance #30, Series of I977, fifth
paragraph from the top, is hereby amended to read as follows:
?.(c':ri
of the structure and the materia'l1y harmoni ous rvi th the remaj nder
5.
./-J
"(
4.Access to the unit-must not adversely affect the privacyof adjacent structures.
The applicant shall agree in writing:
a. That the empl oyee hou s i ng uni t sha I I not be sol d ,transferred or conveyed unit for a perjod of notless than the life of Trent t,lilliam'Ruder, a lifei1 being, p1 us twenty one (21) years from date thatthe Certificate.of 0ccupancy is issued for sajd unitand
b.using unit shal'l not be 'leased
riod of less than thirty (30)d that if it shall be rented, itto tenants who are f ul'l timeer Eagle Val ley. The "Upperbe deemed to i nc'l ude the GoreCliff, Gilman, Eagle-Vail, andunding areas. A "f u'l l -timen who works an average of th'i rty
and
That the employee housing unit shal'l not be dividedinto any form of timeshares, interval ownership orfractional fee, and
That a declaration of covenants and restrictions sha'l'lbe filed of record in the 0ffice of the Eagle CountyClerk and Recorder in a form approved by the TownAttorney for the benefit of the Town to insure thatthe restrictions herein shal I run with the land.
That the empl oyee hoor rented for any peconsecutive days, anshall be rented onlyemployees in the UppEagle Valley" sha'l 'l
Valley, Minturn, RedAvon and their surroemployee" is a perso(30) hours per week;
c.
d.
c!
rinr
tro
iu
I'!
CL
lr')
o
f.
(f'(n
III
F
u'!
IE
nl
rO
.t
{t
that this ordinance
welfare of the Town
Section 2.If any part, section, subsection, sentence, c'l ause
or phrase of th'is ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such
decision sha'll not effect the va'l'idity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance; and the Town counci'l hereby declares it would have
passed thi s ordi nance, and each part, secti on, subsecti on, sentence,
clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
Parts' sect'i ons, subsection, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
invalid
Section 3. The Town Council hereby fjnds, determines and declares
is necessary and proper for the heal th, safety and
of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
Section 4.The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any
provision of the Vail Municipal code is provjded in this ordinance
shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any
prosecuti on commenced , nor any other acti on or proceed i ng as
virtue of the provision repealed or repealedcommenced under or by
-2-
r
I
ATTEST:
4t4tg3 11-317 F,-99r 1r/17/Ag r4:4i F,6 3 0F3
and reenact€d. The repeal of any provision hereby
any provision or any ordinance previous'l y repealed
un'l ess expressly stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AN
ONCE IN FULL THIS 2Oth DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981, AND A
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE HELD AT THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TOI.IN OF VAIL, COLORADO, ON THE 3 E- DAY OF
1981.
ATTEST:
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED ON SECOND
shal I not revi ve
or superseded
D ORDERED PUBLISHED
PUBLIC HEARING ON
OF THE TOt.lN COUNCII
5.r
(
I
c!
:i
READING AND ORDERED
ls ,L-z-t__DAy oF
-3-