Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-07-27 PECPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION TOWN Of VAI0 July 27, 2020, 1:00 PM Virtual 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 Call to Order 1. 1. Register in advance for this webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_yF_l6X_WS3gCtHLN9Rr Uw After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. 1.2. Attendance Present: Ludwig Kurz, Karen Perez, Rollie Kjesbo, Brian Gillette, Henry Pratt, Pete Seibert, John -Ryan Lockman Absent: None Main Agenda 2.1. A request for review of a final plat, pursuant to Title 13 Chapter 4, Minor 10 min. Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the property line between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0013) Applicant: Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gore Range Surveying LLC Planner: Jonathan Spence Planner Spence introduced the project and explained how the adjustment to the lot line created a more workable solution for the two properties and removed an existing setback nonconformity reaming from development within Eagle County. The two lots retain their existing lot sizes as the swap is equal. No questions from Commissioners. No public comments. Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve. Pete Seibert seconded the motion and it passed (7-0). 2.2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed 5 min. regulation amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Vail Town Code to amend Section 12-10 Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to refine the appropriate sections to allow for a comprehensive approach to meeting the minimum parking requirements, including clarifying the review process and other considerations, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0007) The Applicant requests that this item be tabled to the next regularly scheduled meeting on August 10th, 2020. Applicant: Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Greg Roy Karen Perez moved to table to August 10, 2020. Rollie Kjesbo seconded the motion and it passed (7-0). 3. Approval of Minutes 3.1. July 13, 2020 PEC Results Karen Perez moved to approve. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it passed (4-0). Abstain: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert 4. Adjournment Karen Perez moved to adjourn. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it passed (7-0). The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Please call 711 for sign language interpretation 48 hour prior to meeting time. Community Development Department City of Vail, Colorado Logo VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: ITEM/TOPIC: Register in advance for this webinar: https:Hus02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN yF 16X WS3gCtHLN9Rr Uw After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information aboutjoining the webinar. City of Vail, Colorado Logo VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: ITEM/TOPIC: Attendance City of Vail, Colorado Logo VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: July 27, 2020 ITEM/TOPIC: A request for review of a final plat, pursuant to Title 13 Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the property line between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0013) OTTOCHMFNTS- File Name PEC20-0013 Scheidegger Staff Memo.pdf Description Staff memorandum Attachment A. Vicinity Map.pdf Attachment A. Vicinity Map Attachment B. Proposed Plat of Subdivision prepared by Gore Range Surveying dated 6-15- Attachment B. Proposed Plat of Subdivision, 2020. Pd prepared by Gore Range Surveying, dated 6-15- 2020 Attachment C. Exhibit demonstrating compliance with zoning standards.. 1 Attachment C. Exhibit demonstrating compliance with zoning standards. TOWN OF VAIL � Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 27, 2020 SUBJECT: A request for review of a final plat, pursuant to Title 13 Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the property line between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0013) Applicant: Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gore Range Surveying LLC Planner: Jonathan Spence SUMMARY The applicant, Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gore Range Surveying LLC, is requesting the review of a final plat, pursuant to Title 13, Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the property line between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge. Based upon staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends approval of this application, subject to the findings in Section VIII of this 1"L�' iTOTRI t•:"111 II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant, Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gore Range Surveying LLC, is requesting the review of a final plat to allow for the reconfiguration of the shared property line forming the east boundary of 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 and the west boundary 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11. The purpose of the proposed subdivision is to create a more workable property division between the two lots while maintaining each individual lot's compliance with the Town of Vail Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. The graphic below demonstrates the proposed realignment of the shared lot line, along with corresponding private easements. A vicinity map (Attachment A), Final Plat (Attachment B) and exhibit demonstrating compliance with zoning standards (Attachment C) are attached for review. BACKGROUND The subject properties were annexed into the Town of Vail in 1985. The subject properties are under the same ownership. 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Construction of a single-family home approved at DRB in April 2019, is ongoing. Town of Vail Page 2 �o SET A Na. 5 RERAR YATH kQ A , } ALUMINuM CAP 1— No. 30091 LOT 10 �� AJM o_ .Q° FOUND A PLAIN Ne. 5 RERI hry / bQ "� V •�13tl9'29• 17'43'00" R=1s3.33• 2' ^�° �a°' S`Si IN R=153.33' is zsi• /� `TS•s4 �3• T=23.90 Ch9=Na•zsad°E cnL=35.13' /W Bey F`4j L=47.41' ChB=N49'43'30'E ChL=47.22' � FOUN6 A PLAIN Na. 5 RERAR I =14.59'12' h9 / LOT 11 LOT 1% R=137.07' T=16.03' 4 I-�z]n�,•3a° E /�� a 0.3664 ACRES O I FOUND A PLAIN Ne. 5 PE9AR ChB=N66'04'3'36' E C� `N suzs'ae' E \ Ch L=35.75' gyp. / f 605 caEnrEo er iws PLAT ]Nnutt EASEI.ENr \ FOVND A PLAIN Na. 5 RMAR / (CROSS -MATCHED AREA) /� .`5 (RECEPTON No. ,) 03252 63'25'49' W 1-W N 59'44'22" E — 30.61' / PROPERTY LINE Vj� / 5 CREATED DV THIS PLAT QQ �. S 54'13'59" E — 29.94' A(FECEPnON Nu fi vs g S 30'0021" 2ox,aea9j s 54.67' S 74.06'55" E — 21.12' $ / ��5 LOT 16 , PROPERTY LINE)-, aTED ev TUIs PUT LOT 12 a 5 68'28'18" E — 31.40' i" s 0.3389 ACRES „� � ,� 2702 FDNND A No - REBAR VllllT] EASEMENT ?y NIM A 1 j° AWN INUN CAP P L6. No. 1682] / 17 CREArEB B1 R115 PLAT (CROSS -HATCHED AREA) / LOT 13 O / / / / ,4100 LOT 15 FOUND A PLAIN Na 5 9EDAR A vicinity map (Attachment A), Final Plat (Attachment B) and exhibit demonstrating compliance with zoning standards (Attachment C) are attached for review. BACKGROUND The subject properties were annexed into the Town of Vail in 1985. The subject properties are under the same ownership. 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Construction of a single-family home approved at DRB in April 2019, is ongoing. Town of Vail Page 2 2702 Cortina Lane I Lot 12 Existing single-family dwelling constructed under Eagle County jurisdiction in 1972. IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff finds the following provisions of the Vail Town Code relevant to the review of this proposal: Title 12 — Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code Chapter 6, Article D. Two Family Primary/ Secondary Residential (PS) District (in part) 12-6D-1: PURPOSE.- The URPOSE: The two-family primary/secondary residential district is intended to provide sites for single-family residential uses or two-family residential uses in which one unit is a larger primary residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment, together with such public facilities as may appropriately be located in the same zone district. The two-family primary/secondary residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single-family and two-family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site development standards. 12-6D-2: PERMITTED USES.- The SES: The following uses shall be permitted.- Employee ermitted: Employee housing units, as further regulated by chapter 13 of this title. Single-family residential dwellings Two-family residential dwellings 12-6D-5: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS.- The IMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eight feet (80) on each side, within its boundaries. 12-6D-6: SETBACKS.- Town ETBACKS: Town of Vail Page 3 In the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20'), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15'), and the minimum rear setback shall be fifteen feet (15'). 12-6D-8: DENSITY CONTROL: A. Dwelling Units: Not more than a total of two (2) dwelling units shall be permitted on each site with only one dwelling unit permitted on existing lots less than fourteen thousand (14, 000) square feet. 1. Exception: Properties that meet all of the following three (3) conditions shall be permitted a total of two (2) dwelling units on existing lots less than fourteen thousand (14, 000) square feet.- a. eet: a. The property was annexed into the town of Vail with two (2) existing dwelling units on a lot less than fourteen thousand (14, 000) square feet. b. The property as of April 1, 2016, contained two (2) dwelling units on a lot less than fourteen thousand (14,000) square feet. c. At no time between the property's annexation and April 1, 2016, did the property contain less than two (2) dwelling units. 2. Discontinuance of Exception: If at any time any property as described above develops or redevelops with only one dwelling unit, this exception for the allowance of two (2) units shall no longer be valid for such property. B. Gross Residential Floor Area.- 1. rea: 1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on each site.- a. ite: a. Not more than forty six (46) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first ten thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area, plus b. Thirty eight (38) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over ten thousand (10,000) square feet, not exceeding fifteen thousand (15, 000) square feet of site area, plus c. Thirteen (13) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen Town of Vail Page 4 thousand (15, 000) square feet, not exceeding thirty thousand (30, 000) square feet of site area, plus d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of thirty thousand (30, 000) square feet. 2. The secondary unit shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the allowable gross residential floor area (GRFA). C. Employee Housing Units: Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections A and 8 of this section, a type I employee housing unit shall be permitted on lots of less than fourteen thousand (14, 000) square feet in accordance with the provisions of chapter 13 of this title. Any type 1 employee housing unit existing on or before April 18, 2000, shall not be eliminated unless all dwelling units are demolished, in which case the zoning on the property shall apply. However, an existing type I employee housing unit may be replaced with a type 11 employee housing unit on lots of fourteen thousand (14,000) square feet or greater. 12-6D-9: SITE COVERAGE.- Site OVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total site area. 12-6D-10: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT: At least sixty percent (60%) of each site shall be landscaped. The minimum of any area qualifying as landscaping shall be ten feet (10) (width and length) with a minimum area not less than three hundred (300) square feet. 12-6D-11: PARKING: Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this title. Title 13 — Subdivision Regulations, Vail Town Code Chapter 1, General Provisions (in part) 13-1-2: PURPOSE.- A. URPOSE: A. Statutory Authority: The subdivision regulations contained in this title have been prepared and enacted in accordance with Colorado Revised Statutes title 31, article 23, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the town. Town of Vail Page 5 B. Goals: To these ends, these regulations are intended to protect the environment, to ensure efficient circulation, adequate improvements, sufficient open space and in general, to assist the orderly, efficient and integrated development of the town. These regulations also provide for the proper arrangement of streets and ensure proper distribution of population. The regulations also coordinate the need for public services with governmental improvement programs. Standards for design and construction of improvements are hereby set forth to ensure adequate and convenient traffic circulation, utilities, emergency access, drainage, recreation and light and air. Also intended is the improvement of land records and surveys, plans and plats and to safeguard the interests of the public and subdivider and provide consumer protection for the purchaser; and to regulate other matters as the town planning and environmental commission and town council may deem necessary in order to protect the best interests of the public. C. Specific Purposes: These regulations are further intended to serve the following specific purposes.- 1. urposes: 1. To inform each subdivider of the standards and criteria by which development proposals will be evaluated, and to provide information as to the type and extent of improvements required. 2. To provide for the subdivision of property in the future without conflict with development on adjacent land. 3. To protect and conserve the value of land throughout the municipality and the value of buildings and improvements on the land. 4. To ensure that subdivision of property is in compliance with the town's zoning ordinance, to achieve a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with town development objectives. 5. To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide adequate and efficient transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreation, and other public requirements and facilities and generally to provide that public facilities will have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. 6. To provide for accurate legal descriptions of newly subdivided land and to establish reasonable and desirable construction design standards and procedures. 7. To prevent the pollution of air, streams and ponds, to assure adequacy of drainage facilities, to safeguard the water table and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the Town of Vail Page 6 town in order to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the community and the value of the land. 13-1-3: COMPLIANCE.- A. OMPLIANCE: A. General Prohibition: It is unlawful for any person, business, or corporation to violate any of the provisions of this chapter or to transfer, sell, lease or agree to sell or lease, any lot, tract, parcel, site, separate interest (including a leasehold interest), interest in common, condominium interest, timeshare estate, fractional fee, or timeshare license, or any other division within a subdivision within the town until such subdivision has been approved in writing by the administrator, planning and environmental commission and/or the council (whichever is applicable) and a plat thereof recorded in the office of the Eagle County clerk and recorder; provided, however, that a written agreement to sell or lease which is expressly conditioned upon full compliance by the seller with the subdivision regulations of the town within a specified period of time and which expressly recites the seller's failure to satisfy such condition within such period of time shall terminate the agreement and entitle the buyer to the prompt return of all consideration heretofore paid by the buyer under such agreement, shall not constitute a violation of this subsection. B. Prohibitive Conveyance: No lot or parcel of land, nor any interest therein, shall be transferred, conveyed, sold, subdivided or acquired either in whole or in part, so as to create a new nonconforming lot, or to avoid or circumvent or subvert any provision of this chapter. C. Responsibility: The owner, developer, buyer, or seller shall be fully responsible for all acts of agents or employees thereof that are committed in violation of the terms of this chapter. Chapter 2, Definitions (in part) SUBDIVISION OR SUBDIVIDED LAND.- A. AND: A. Meaning.- 1. eaning: 1. A tract of land which is divided into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels, sites, separate interests (including leasehold interests), interests in common, or other division for the purpose, whether immediate or future, of transfer of ownership, or for building or other development, or for street use by reference to such subdivision or recorded plat thereof; or 2. A tract of land including land to be used for condominiums, timeshare units, or fractional fee club units, or Town of Vail Page 7 3. A house, condominium, apartment or other dwelling unit which is divided into two (2) or more separate interests through division of the fee or title thereto, whether by conveyance, license, lease, contract for sale or any other method of disposition. B. Exceptions: Unless the method of land disposition is adopted for the purpose of evading this definition, the term "subdivision" as defined herein shall not apply to any of the following divisions of land or interests in land.- 1. and: 1. The division of land by order of any court in this state or by operation of law. 2. The division of land by a lien, mortgage, deed of trust or any other security instrument. 3. The division of land by a security or unit of interest in any investment trust regulated under the laws of this state or any other interest in an investment entity. 4. The division of land which creates an interest or interests in oil, gas or minerals which are now or hereafter severed from the surface ownership of real property. 5. The division of land by the acquisition of an interest in land in the name of a husband and wife or other persons in joint tenancy or as tenants in common and any such interest shall be deemed for purposes of this definition as only one interest; provided, however, that no agreement exists, either recorded or unrecorded, between the cotenants allowing for the use and occupancy of the property by one or more cotenants to the exclusion of one or more cotenants during any period, whether annually recurring or not if such agreement is in any way binding or effective upon any assignee or future owner of a fractional fee interest or if such agreement continues to be in any way binding or effective upon any cotenant for the sale of any interest in the property. 6. The division of land by reason of the dissolution of a joint venture or business entity. C. Compliance: No subdivision shall be approved which includes elements not in conformance with the provisions of any applicable zoning ordinance or other ordinance of the town or law or regulations of the state. D. Major Subdivision: Any subdivision involving more than four (4) lots, or a subdivision proposal without all lots having frontage on a public or approved street, or with a request to extend municipal facilities in a significant manner, Town of Vail Page 8 or a proposal which would negatively affect the natural environment as determined under section 12-12-2, "Applicability", of this code, or if the proposal would adversely affect the development of the remainder of the parcel or adjoining property. E. Minor Subdivision: Any subdivision containing not more than four (4) lots fronting on an existing street, not involving any new street or road or the extension of municipal facilities and not adversely affecting the development of the remainder of the parcel or adjoining property. F. Single -Family Subdivision: A subdivision of an existing lot, which is recognized by the town of Vail as a legally subdivided lot, and which shall contain a single-family or two-family dwelling. Each such dwelling shall be separated from any other dwelling by space on all sides. For zoning purposes, the lots created by a single-family subdivision shall be treated as one lot. Chapter 3, Section 4, Commission Review of Application, Criteria and Necessary Findings.- 13-3-4.- indings: 13-3-4: COMMISSION REVIEW OF APPLICATION; CRITERIA AND NECESSARY FINDINGS The planning and environmental commission shall conduct a public hearing on an application for a preliminary plan for subdivision. The planning and environmental commission shall consider the application, relevant additional materials, staff report and recommendations as well as any other comments or public information given at the hearing. The planning and environmental commission may discuss advisable changes to the proposed subdivision with the applicant. The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to show that the application is in compliance with the intent and purposes of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and other pertinent regulations that the planning and environmental commission deems applicable. Due consideration shall be given to the recommendations made by public agencies, utility companies and other agencies consulted under subsection 13-3-C of this chapter. A. Before recommending approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of the preliminary plan, the planning and environmental commission shall consider the following criteria with respect to the proposed subdivision.- 1. ubdivision: 1. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is consistent with all the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town, and 2. The extent to which the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of this title, as well as, but not limited to, title 12, "Zoning Town of Vail Page 9 Regulations", of this code, and other pertinent regulations that the planning and environmental commission deems applicable, and 3. The extent to which the proposed subdivision presents a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives, and 4. The extent of the effects on the future development of the surrounding area, and 5. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development; and 6. The extent to which the utility lines are sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade undersized lines, and 7. The extent to which the proposed subdivision provides for the growth of an orderly viable community and serves the best interests of the community as a whole, and 8. The extent to which the proposed subdivision results in adverse or beneficial impacts on the natural environment, including, but not limited to, water quality, air quality, noise, vegetation, riparian corridors, hillsides and other desirable natural features, and 9. Such other factors and criteria as the commission and/or council deem applicable to the proposed subdivision. B. Necessary Findings: Before recommending and/or granting an approval of an application for a major subdivision, the planning and environmental commission shall make the following findings with respect to the proposed major subdivision.- 1. ubdivision: 1. That the subdivision is in compliance with the criteria listed in subsection A of this section. 2. That the subdivision is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town. 3. That the subdivision is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas. Town of Vail Page 10 4. That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions (in part) 13-4-2: PROCEDURE: The procedure for a minor subdivision shall be as follows.- A. ollows: A. Submission of Proposal; Waiver Of Requirements: The subdivider shall submit two (2) copies of the proposal following the requirements for a final plat in subsection 13-3-68 of this title, with the provision that certain of these requirements may be waived by the administrator and/or the planning and environmental commission if determined not applicable to the project. B. PEC Public Hearing: Within thirty (30) days of receiving the complete and correct submittal for a minor subdivision, the planning and environmental commission shall hold a public hearing to consider the final plat. The administrator shall cause a copy of a notice of the time, place and general nature of the hearing and proposal to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the town at least fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing. Also, adjacent property owners to the proposed subdivision shall be notified in writing at least seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. C. Review and Action on Plat: The planning and environmental commission shall review the plat and associated materials and shall approve, approve with modifications or disapprove the plat within twenty one (21) days of the first public hearing on the minor subdivision or the minor subdivision will be deemed approved. A longer time period for rendering a decision may be granted subject to mutual agreement between the planning and environmental commission and subdivider. The review shall be based on the criteria and necessary findings in section 13-3-4 of this title. D. Appeal: Within twenty (20) days the decision of the planning and environmental commission on the final plat shall be transmitted to the council by the staff. The council may call up the decision of the planning and environmental commission within twenty (20) days of the planning and environmental commission's action. If council appeals the planning and environmental commission decision, the council shall hear substantially the same presentation by the applicant as was heard at the planning and environmental commission hearing(s). The council shall have thirty (30) days to affirm, reverse, or affirm with modifications the planning and environmental Town of Vail Page 11 V commission decision, and the council shall conduct the appeal at a regularly scheduled council meeting. ZONING AND SITE ANALYSIS Addresses: Legal Descriptions: Zoning: Land Use Plan Designations Current Land Uses: Geological Hazards: View Corridor: 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 and 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Vail Ridge, Lot 11/Lot 12, Block B Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) Low Density Residential Single-family residential None None Development Allowed / Existing Proposed Change Standard Required 2698 Cortina Lane/Lot 11 Site Area 15,000 SF 15,951 15,951 0 Front: 20' Front: >_20' Front: >_20' Setbacks Sides: 15' Side: >_15' Side: >_15' No Change** Side: >_15' Side: >_15' Rear: 15' Rear: >_15' Rear: >_15' Density (DUs) Max. 2 2 DU 1 DU No Change 1012 Eagles Nest Circle / Lot 2 Site Area 15,000 SF 14,675 14,675 0 Front — 20' Front: >_20' Front: >_20' Setbacks Sides — 15' Side: 13.6'* Side: >_15' No Change Rear — 15' Side: >_15' Side: >_15' Rear: >_15' Rear: >_15' Density DUs Max. 2 2 DU 1 DU No Change *The proposed lot line adjustment results in the removal of the nonconformity. VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Existing Land Use: Zoning District: North: Low Density Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential South: Low Density Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential East: Low Density Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential West: Low Density Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential Town of Vail Page 12 VII. REVIEW CRITERIA The following are review criteria for a minor subdivision, as outlined in Section 13-3-4, Commission Review of Application; Criteria and Necessary Findings, Vail Town Code: 1. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is consistent with all the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town; and Staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town. While the Comprehensive Plan is does not discuss single-family and duplex subdivisions in great detail, Goal 1.3 of the Vail Land Use Plan states, "the quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible." If approved, the proposed reconfiguration would result in a more workable shared lot line. Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion. 2. The extent to which the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of this title, as well as, but not limited to, title 12, "Zoning Regulations," of this code, and other pertinent regulations that the planning and environmental commission deems applicable; and Staff finds that the proposed subdivision is in compliance with all of the standards of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, Vail Town Code. As proposed, the two (2) development lots meet all development standards for the Two -Family Primary/Secondary (PS) District. Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion. 3. The extent to which the proposed subdivision presents a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives; and Staff finds that the proposed subdivision presents a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives. The proposed shared property line with associated private easements will result in a more workable scenario for current and future owners. The proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the existing relationship among land uses. Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion. 4. The extent of the effects on the future development of the surrounding area; and Town of Vail Page 13 Staff finds that the proposed reconfiguration will have no negative impacts on the future development of the surrounding area. Also, the surrounding area has been developed and an alteration to a shared private property line between the subject properties will not affect the surrounding area, now, or in the future. Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion. 5. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development; and Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not cause any inefficiency in the delivery of public services, will not require duplication or premature extension of public services, and will not result in a leapfrog development pattern because the applicant is proposing a subdivision of existing platted lots already served by public facilities. Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion. 6. The extent to which the utility lines are sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade undersized lines; and Staff finds that the proposed subdivision is already served by appropriately sized utility lines, resulting in no future land disruptions to upgrade undersized lines. Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion. 7. The extent to which the proposed subdivision provides for the growth of an orderly viable community and serves the best interests of the community as a whole; and Staff finds that the proposed subdivision provides for the growth of an orderly viable community and serves the best interests of the community as a whole, because there will be no negative impact to the community as a whole while facilitating the community's goal to allow for the maintenance and upgrading of existing development within the Town. Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion. 8. The extent to which the proposed subdivision results in adverse or beneficial impacts on the natural environment, including, but not limited to, water quality, air quality, noise, vegetation, riparian corridors, hillsides and other desirable natural features; and Town of Vail Page 14 Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not result in any adverse impacts on the natural environment, including, but not limited to, water quality, air quality, noise, vegetation, riparian corridors, hillsides and other desirable natural features. Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion. 9. Such other factors and criteria as the commission and/or council deem applicable to the proposed subdivision. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends approval, of a final plat pursuant to Title 13, Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the property line between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this minor subdivision, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission pass the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request for a final plat, pursuant to Title 13, Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the property line between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard thereto." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this minor subdivision, the Community Development Departments recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission makes the following findings: 'Based upon a review of Section Vll of the July 27, 2020 staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds.- 1. inds: 1. That the subdivision is in compliance with the criteria listed in Section 13-3-4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, and 2. That the subdivision is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town,- Town own, Town of Vail Page 15 3. That the subdivision is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas, and 4. That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality." IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Proposed Plat of Subdivision, prepared by Gore Range Surveying, dated 6/15/2020 C. Exhibit demonstrating compliance with zoning standards. Town of Vail Page 16 aoa \ Aga O w - ,q o �oP Aa LL �m �1 TAT Q OLu Vo v�o LL- Q�O�//�� W � z apo F-- J Q W> ry � _ 61 8 C 82 ff w8 - _oosw- 4z �8ze m o�� :E 8� - gooa amx - 38 8 V I d — d > O � l7 VI O 4 till 0 0 � W g0(S-) W Z O Q 4 W C) O 0 Z Q �/5 0 W J Q W 0 Z W0 O r \ ,L£9£t \ rr O W O 00 ss \ 00 Q � S N �Q 0- \ 00~ cn o Q0 z — w \ :~u N (/) � >- � Qm Q z Wo I C/-) W �Q � J o y LLJ m r�� �N U WWLO � ow � � W O 0 0 Z1 Ln� 9ZoS0 S W, z~ U) > / Qw N Sz o / a- Q N w� / \ mQ / w=0 n,n / Qm Q LC)/// W Q0 w� z c / zQ -z ~ Q O o Jwm / m zD \ �m v / �� Q QJ I a_ / W � n SIN N1 C:) \ oz w = i / J V) Q O� U \ J / > ' \ L N L � N � C/1) N �J City of Vail, Colorado Logo VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: July 27, 2020 ITEM/TOPIC: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed regulation amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Vail Town Code to amend Section 12-10 Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to refine the appropriate sections to allow for a comprehensive approach to meeting the minimum parking requirements, including clarifying the review process and other considerations, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0007) The Applicant requests that this item be tabled to the next regularly scheduled meeting on August 10th, 2020. City of Vail, Colorado Logo VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: ITEM/TOPIC: July 13, 2020 PEC Results ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Pec results 071320.pdf July 13, 2020 PEC Results 0 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION TOW?J OF ffl July 13, 2020, 1:00 PM Town Council Chambers & Virtual 75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657 Call to Order 1. 1. Attendance Present: Ludwig Kurz, Rollie Kjesbo, Brian Gillette, Karen Perez Absent: John -Ryan Lockman, Pete Seibert, Henry Pratt 1.2. Register in advance for this webinar: https://us02web.zoom. us/webinar/register/W N_ETcZHgnLS_6jd9wJ gxfQgA After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Main Agenda 2.1. A request for the review of a variance from Section 12-6D-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, to allow for a variance to the requirement that a secondary unit in the Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential zone district not exceed 40% of allowable site GRFA, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, located at 775 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 19, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC19-0050) Applicant: Scott Ryan & Foster Gillett, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Erik Gates Planner Gates gives a presentation on the application, going over the variance requested, the previous meeting when this application was heard, and the staff recommendation. Kjesbo asks about the original development of the home when it comes to which was the primary or secondary unit. Gates responded affirmatively that the East unit was the primary when developed. Gillette asks for clarification on GRFA and how it is being divided between the units. Asks for some history of the changes in the code that led to the current situation. Gates responds with some of the history and how it affected the home in question. Perez adds that a full understanding of the inequity is needed. Dominic Mauriello, the applicant representative, goes over a presentation on 20 min. the application Gillette asks as to whether the property is double dipping by getting this variance. Maruiello says that the lot would not be double dipping, simply asking for the currently allowed amount of GRFA to be used by either side. Perez summarizes that this would be taking away the primary/secondary part of this zoning. Mauriello explains that this would not be a special privilege because what is there today is an unintended consequence of that amendment. Kjesbo asks if the west unit got the deduction for the basement. Mauriello says that yes, it is the lower basement, so it got the deduction. Because of this it got less GRFA and added to the inequity. Kjesbo says the basement issue for duplexes was originally thought about in the 2004 code, and nothing was different when this section was clarified in 2016. Gillette says he is having a hard time finding the inequity in the current situation. Mauriello brings the conversation back to the intent of the 2004 change Gillette says that they already took advantage of the pre code change credits. Creating nonconformities happens and the other side got more GRFA than they would have otherwise would have been allowed. Perez says the whole point was to have consistency and you are asking us to not have consistency. If we do this for one based on this situation then we'd have to do it for everyone. Gillette says that the 2016 basement clarification was always enforced and that the clarification was solidified at that point. Mauriello restates his argument that one of the units got shorted out of GRFA with the change when it was approved. Gillette says the original intent of the 40/60 was to have the smaller side be a caretaker unit and not a smaller side of the duplex No public comment at this time. Ludwig closes the public comment. No final comments from staff or applicant. Final discussion from commissioners: Gillette asks for clarity from staff on recommendation. Gates responds that it was based on loss of any development potential as a direct result of code change, but believes that PEC is valid in their viewpoint of preserving the 60/40 split. Gillette asks for clarification on if double dipping or not Gates said it does not seem like double dipping, there is development left. They would not be getting anything additional. Rollie Kjesbo moved to deny. Karen Perez seconded the motion and it passed (4-0). Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert 2.2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed 90 min. regulation amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Vail Town Code to amend Section 12-10 Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to refine the appropriate sections to allow for a comprehensive approach to meeting the minimum parking requirements, including clarifying the review process and other considerations, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0007) Applicant: Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Greg Roy Planner Roy began by describing how this amendment was brought up in the first place. I n the last meeting a few options were discussed for parking solutions for developments with additions that cannot add new parking. The first time this issue was brought up, the PEC recommended a more comprehensive approach to fixing parking standards. The current proposed changes include: increasing the distance that would qualify for off-site parking, combine the pay -in -lieu parking zone with the core parking area map, expand what the current parking fund can be used for, and create a secondary pay -in -lieu zone that would focus on zones with more of a mix of vehicular and pedestrian access. Tom Braun spoke about the previous meetings related to this parking issue which was to provide and outlet for properties in Lionshead and vail village that are outside the defined pay -in -lieu parking area. Braun then showed the current pay -in -lieu map. Properties within the pay -in -lieu zones can only pay into this fee to provide for their parking. Trying to find some relief for properties that also cannot build more parking for additions but are not within this defined zone. Braun then identified additional properties that could be a part of the pay -in -lieu based on their adjacency to pedestrian only areas. Braun described this as the foundation for the current code changes. Current code allows any property outside the pay -in -lieu zone to apply for the pay -in -lieu option to the PEC. Felt this is problematic and too broad. Braun then showed a map of the proposed secondary pay -in -lieu zone, which would be a zone allowed to ask the PEC to use the pay -in -lieu fund. Braun then listed some parameters for this request. Additions to existing properties should be considered for the pay -in -lieu. Demo/rebuilds should have access to provide new parking so they would not qualify. This should not be used as a way to eliminate existing parking to provide more development area. Applicants for this secondary district must provide evidence for the need to utilize the pay -in -lieu. This proposal also would allow the pay -in -lieu funds to be used for multi- modal transportation improvements. Currently commercial uses in the pay -in -lieu zone are not required to provide parking or funds. This proposal would define lodge rooms as commercial uses. If the town would waive the fee for restaurants and other commercial uses, why would it not waive it for lodging as well? Braun discussed a study of uses in this zone and their would-be parking requirements. Found that the town provided parking that would be utilized by these uses only accounts for about 40% of the available public parking. Most of the parking issue within the town is from day-trippers to the town. In addressing concerns related these changes overcrowding existing parking structures, Braun stated that most projects within the core area have been additions. These have been very small additions and are unlikely to result in a large influx of parking need. In addressing why lodges should be considered exempt, Braun stated that again the additions historically and in the future, based on current build out, are very small. Commissioner Gillette: Asked if the town had seen any benefit from exempting retail and restaurants. Braun: Thinks that the town has seen benefit from this incentive. I n discussing the load on the parking garages, thought the impact would be small and that the Town should be prioritizing those who are spending an extended period of time in Vail rather than day -trips from the front range. Braun ended his presentation by saying that if no change is made then you will likely see very little development investment in the core areas outside the pay -in -lieu area due to the burden of parking. Chairman Kurz: One concern the PEC had in April was about the length of the lease for parking spaces. Why was that not addressed in this proposal. Braun: We saw some language in the code that we felt needed to be fixed and wanted to address these issues first. The town still has control over what terms it wants to see in these leases. Gillette: When this was first being discussed, there was a property that could not build its third parking level for groundwater reasons. The PEC let them use pay -in -lieu, but with this proposal that would not be allowed because that property was a demo/rebuild. Wants to look more into the need to exempt lodges and retail. Also wants to know why the fee only accounts for 1/3rd of a parking spot. Thinks the fee should be equivalent to the cost of a parking space. Wants to know the benefit the town gets and the benefit the town is providing in more detail. Braun: In clarifying the situation for the development in need of pay -in -lieu, they were granted a onetime use of the pay -in -lieu. Gillette: But we still wouldn't have been able to grant that under these new regulations correct? Roy: Believes we could allow for that sort of thing through a variance process. Perez: Wants staff to confirm that this is an option. Worried about opening the flood gates for this sort of variance. Worried about writing ourselves out of a solution avenue. Gillette: Still has an issue with exempting certain uses. If they cannot provide an additional parking space then they should have the option to request use of pay -in -lieu at the least. Braun: We developed these changes based on the purpose of the existing parking regulations. There is still a special exemption through the PEC that could still be allowed for properties outside the Vail core. Gillette: Wants something addressing variance language. Wants no exemptions on any property, Council can change this if they want to. Wants to set the pay -in -lieu fee at the cost of a parking space Braun: Offered a cost -benefit analysis to support for the current fee price and for the exemption of lodge units. Gillette: That would help. Perez: Wants to go through the changes section by section. Kjesbo: In favor of expanding the pay -in -lieu zone. Also wants to increase the fee in conjunction. Thinks there still needs to be a pay -in -lieu or parking requirement for lodge units. Perez: Agrees with Gillette and Kjesbo. Asked for clarification on certain proposed changes. Wanted clarification on why a section related to loading requirements was removed. Braun: We intended to remove all references to loading requirements in the parking requirements. Perez: But loading is still a part of parking, so loading needs to be addressed as well. Braun: Could not find a reason for including reference to loading in these sections. Perez: Concerned about why there was a section making reference to the fee without referencing when the fee is due. Spence: We generally do not include due dates for fees within the code because this is an administrative function. We require these fees at the building permit. Perez: Questions the need to remove PEC purview related to where off-site parking will be located. The changes would have the PEC just look to see if the proposed parking is within a quarter mile with no flexibility or digression in their review. Kurz: Also feels that the pay -in -lieu should reflect the cost of a parking space rather than simply a number picked out of the blue. Asked the applicant and staff come up with some compromises to address the PEC comments. Gillette: Could see future staff reading these changes and determining that pay -in -lieu is not available to anyone outside of the core of Vail, even with PEC review. This should not be the intent. Public Comment Dominic Mauriello: Thankful that these old code sections are being looked at. Had a question about the distance required for off-site parking. Felt that the quarter -mile language was more applicable for discussing the walkability of Vail Village in ski boots. Thinks that this distance should be more flexible due to the presence of free shuttles and ability for developments to provide shuttles to off-site parking. Also had a concern about the barring of demo/rebuilds for the pay -in -lieu area. Felt that requiring the fee be equal to a parking space would hamper development. Small additions could generate hundreds of thousands in revenue but would have a hard time being built if they had to provide the full up -front cost of a parking spot. Gillette: This is why a cost -benefit analysis would be helpful. Braun: Requested a tabling. Rollie Kjesbo moved to table to July 27, 2020. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it passed (4-0). Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert 3. Approval of Minutes 3.1. June 22, 2020 PEC Results Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it passed (4-0). Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert 4. 1 nformational Update 4.1. West Vail Master Plan Update Applicant: Planner: Matt Gennett Gennett gives an update of the process the West Vail Master Plan Committee has been up to at this point. Provides dates and efforts planned for future meetings, deadlines, projects, reports, outreach, and focus groups. A short run-through of the EngageVail website was done. Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert 5. Adjournment Rollie Kjesbo moved to adjourn. Karen Perez seconded the motion and it passed (4-0). Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Please call 711 for sign language interpretation 48 hour prior to meeting time. Community Development Department Ad #: 0000602473-01 Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM DEVLM Your account number is: 1023233 PROOF OF PUBLICATION VAIL DAILY STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF EAGLE I, Mark Wurzer, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of the VAIL DAILY, that the same daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice and advertisement as requested. The VAIL DAILY is an accepted legal advertising medium, only forjurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 7/24/2020 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 7/24/2020 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 8/11/2020. Mark Wurzer. Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 8/11/2020. Holly Hunter, Notary Public My Commission Expires: August 19, 2021 nor r HudTl;q k—P J pg,] PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION July 27, 2020, 1:00 PM Virtual 75S. Frontage Road - Vell, C—mclo, 8165/ Call to Order 1.1. Reginter inadvance for this —bin-https://usD2u b.m m.mAM bi,wlregister/ W NyF_16X_W S3gCtHLbMRr_llw After registering, ycu will receive a confin-uw-email mntaning information bout joining the webinar. 1.2. Adendance 2. Man Agenda 2.1. A request for review cf a final plat, pursuant to TMIe 13 Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Cotle, m allow br a subdivision to reconfigure the properly line between two (2) parcels located x12698 Canna Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and setting torch details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0013) 10 in Applicant: Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gae Range Surveying LLC Planner: Jonathan Spence 2.2. Arequestfora mcommendafionlothe Vail Town Coundlforapresaibed reguletlon amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Veil Town Code ,o=Section 12-10 Oh Skeet Parking and Loading, Vall Town Code, to refine the apprgxiate sections to allow for a wmprehensi,a approach W meeting the minimum parking requirements, mdudi darilying thereview process anolhar consideretions, and setfing iMh details in regartl ihereb. IPEC20-0007) 45 in. PPanGmunRAssociates, 3. Approval of Minutes reg oy 3.1. July 13, 2020 PEC Results 4. Adjourn— The applications and Information about the p opo als are availablefor p blic Inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Depadment, 75 South Frontage Roatl. TM1e public is invited to attend the p,cjed orientation and the site visits that precede Ne public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Tines and adar cd items we approximate, subjectW change, and cannot be relied uponto dalermine at whet time the Planning am EnNrc nd.1 Commisslon will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for add hional information. Please call 711 for sign lav - g age inteMnelation 48 hour prior W meeting time. Cor munity Development Department Published in the Vail Daily July 24, 2020. 0000602473 Ad #: 0000598889-01 Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM DEVLM Your account number is: 1023233 PROOF OF PUBLICATION VAIL DAILY STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF EAGLE I, Mark Wurzer, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of the VAIL DAILY, that the same daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice and advertisement as requested. The VAIL DAILY is an accepted legal advertising medium, only forjurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 7/10/2020 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 7/10/2020 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day, 7/31/2020. Mark Wurzer. Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day 7/31/2020. Jerilynn Medina, Notary Public My Commission Expires: August 3, 2020 .1Er�E �YM!J MEp!Rd�S FiATf Dtcutnzoo NOTMZY lil2gir�079i9g u`/vCfi%¢CGON:Xi'IRI:GAk3Gil57et.26x' THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance wilh section t Vail Town Code, on July 27, 2020 a11:00 pm In the Town of Vail Munidpal Building. Regis=er in advance for =his webinar: Mips://us02web.zoom.usrWebinar/reoisferAVN_vF_18 WS3oCWLN9Rr_U. After registering, you will receive a confirtnatlon email cortshing information about joining the wabinar. A request for review of a final plat, pant to Tule 13 Chapter 4, Minor SubdMalons, Veil Town Coda, to Ilow for a subtlivision to reconfigure the property line belweon two (21 parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Corina Lane I Lot 12 Block B, Vol Ridge, and setting forth details in raged thereto (PEC20-0013) Appll—t Benno Scheidegger, represented Gore Range Surveying LLC Planner: Jonathan Spence A repot to the PEC agading an administrative approval of a Conditional Use Permit amendment, pur- gant to rte 12, Chapter 16, Amendment Procedures, Van Town Coda, to allow for a 610 square foot ex- pansion to Donovan Pavilion for ad,uh-al storage, a kitchen prep space, and an uh—lbdde room located 11600 S. Frontage Road W. / Unplattad—Donovan Park, and setting loth usual. in regal thereto. (PEC20-0014) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by TAB Associates Planner: Erik Gates The applications and iniorma=bn about=he proposals ea"Aa for public Inspection tluring oiHw hours a1 the Town of Vall Community Development DepatmeM, ]5 South Fron=age Roatl. The pudic Is Irwlted to anentl site visits. Please ca11970-479-2138 or visb www.vailgov coon/planningfor a ddivonalinformahion. Sign language interpretation available upon request wilh 24-hour notticaton, dial 711 Pub r—d! July 10, 2020 in the Vail DWIV. 0000598889