HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-07-27 PECPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
TOWN Of VAI0 July 27, 2020, 1:00 PM
Virtual
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
Call to Order
1. 1. Register in advance for this webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_yF_l6X_WS3gCtHLN9Rr Uw
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing
information about joining the webinar.
1.2. Attendance
Present: Ludwig Kurz, Karen Perez, Rollie Kjesbo, Brian Gillette, Henry
Pratt, Pete Seibert, John -Ryan Lockman
Absent: None
Main Agenda
2.1. A request for review of a final plat, pursuant to Title 13 Chapter 4, Minor 10 min.
Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the
property line between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11
Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge,
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0013)
Applicant: Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gore Range Surveying
LLC
Planner: Jonathan Spence
Planner Spence introduced the project and explained how the adjustment to
the lot line created a more workable solution for the two properties and
removed an existing setback nonconformity reaming from development
within Eagle County. The two lots retain their existing lot sizes as the swap is
equal.
No questions from Commissioners. No public comments.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve. Pete Seibert seconded the motion and it
passed (7-0).
2.2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed 5 min.
regulation amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Vail Town
Code to amend Section 12-10 Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town
Code, to refine the appropriate sections to allow for a comprehensive
approach to meeting the minimum parking requirements, including clarifying
the review process and other considerations, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC20-0007)
The Applicant requests that this item be tabled to the next regularly
scheduled meeting on August 10th, 2020.
Applicant: Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Greg Roy
Karen Perez moved to table to August 10, 2020. Rollie Kjesbo seconded the
motion and it passed (7-0).
3. Approval of Minutes
3.1. July 13, 2020 PEC Results
Karen Perez moved to approve. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (4-0).
Abstain: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert
4. Adjournment
Karen Perez moved to adjourn. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (7-0).
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the
Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project
orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the
Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information.
Please call 711 for sign language interpretation 48 hour prior to meeting time.
Community Development Department
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE:
ITEM/TOPIC:
Register in advance for this webinar:
https:Hus02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN yF 16X WS3gCtHLN9Rr Uw
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information aboutjoining the webinar.
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE:
ITEM/TOPIC: Attendance
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: July 27, 2020
ITEM/TOPIC:
A request for review of a final plat, pursuant to Title 13 Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to
reconfigure the property line between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina
Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0013)
OTTOCHMFNTS-
File Name
PEC20-0013 Scheidegger Staff Memo.pdf
Description
Staff memorandum
Attachment A. Vicinity Map.pdf Attachment A. Vicinity Map
Attachment B. Proposed Plat of Subdivision prepared by Gore Range Surveying dated 6-15- Attachment B. Proposed Plat of Subdivision,
2020. Pd prepared by Gore Range Surveying, dated 6-15-
2020
Attachment C. Exhibit demonstrating compliance with zoning standards.. 1
Attachment C. Exhibit demonstrating compliance
with zoning standards.
TOWN OF
VAIL �
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: July 27, 2020
SUBJECT: A request for review of a final plat, pursuant to Title 13 Chapter 4, Minor
Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the
property line between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11
Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0013)
Applicant: Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gore Range Surveying LLC
Planner: Jonathan Spence
SUMMARY
The applicant, Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gore Range Surveying LLC, is
requesting the review of a final plat, pursuant to Title 13, Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions,
Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the property line between two
(2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702
Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge.
Based upon staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends approval of this application, subject to the findings in Section VIII of this
1"L�' iTOTRI t•:"111
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicant, Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gore Range Surveying LLC, is
requesting the review of a final plat to allow for the reconfiguration of the shared
property line forming the east boundary of 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 and the west
boundary 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11. The purpose of the proposed subdivision is to
create a more workable property division between the two lots while maintaining each
individual lot's compliance with the Town of Vail Zoning and Subdivision Regulations.
The graphic below demonstrates the proposed realignment of the shared lot line, along
with corresponding private easements.
A vicinity map (Attachment A), Final Plat (Attachment B) and exhibit demonstrating
compliance with zoning standards (Attachment C) are attached for review.
BACKGROUND
The subject properties were annexed into the Town of Vail in 1985. The subject
properties are under the same ownership.
2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11
Construction of a single-family home approved at DRB in April 2019, is ongoing.
Town of Vail Page 2
�o
SET A Na. 5 RERAR YATH
kQ
A , } ALUMINuM CAP
1— No. 30091
LOT 10
��
AJM o_
.Q°
FOUND A PLAIN Ne. 5 RERI
hry /
bQ "� V
•�13tl9'29•
17'43'00" R=1s3.33• 2' ^�° �a°'
S`Si IN
R=153.33' is zsi• /�
`TS•s4
�3•
T=23.90 Ch9=Na•zsad°E
cnL=35.13' /W
Bey
F`4j
L=47.41'
ChB=N49'43'30'E
ChL=47.22'
�
FOUN6 A PLAIN Na. 5 RERAR
I
=14.59'12'
h9
/
LOT 11
LOT 1%
R=137.07'
T=16.03'
4 I-�z]n�,•3a°
E /�� a
0.3664 ACRES
O I
FOUND A PLAIN Ne. 5 PE9AR
ChB=N66'04'3'36' E
C� `N suzs'ae' E
\
Ch L=35.75'
gyp.
/ f
605 caEnrEo er iws PLAT
]Nnutt
EASEI.ENr \
FOVND A PLAIN Na. 5 RMAR
/ (CROSS -MATCHED AREA)
/� .`5
(RECEPTON
No. ,)
03252
63'25'49' W
1-W N 59'44'22"
E — 30.61'
/ PROPERTY LINE
Vj�
/ 5 CREATED DV THIS PLAT
QQ
�.
S 54'13'59" E — 29.94'
A(FECEPnON Nu
fi vs g S 30'0021"
2ox,aea9j
s 54.67'
S 74.06'55" E — 21.12'
$ /
��5 LOT 16
,
PROPERTY LINE)-,
aTED ev TUIs PUT
LOT 12
a 5 68'28'18" E — 31.40'
i"
s 0.3389 ACRES
„�
� ,�
2702 FDNND A No - REBAR
VllllT] EASEMENT
?y NIM A 1 j° AWN INUN CAP
P L6. No. 1682] /
17
CREArEB B1 R115 PLAT
(CROSS -HATCHED AREA)
/
LOT 13
O / /
/
/ ,4100
LOT 15
FOUND A PLAIN Na 5 9EDAR
A vicinity map (Attachment A), Final Plat (Attachment B) and exhibit demonstrating
compliance with zoning standards (Attachment C) are attached for review.
BACKGROUND
The subject properties were annexed into the Town of Vail in 1985. The subject
properties are under the same ownership.
2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11
Construction of a single-family home approved at DRB in April 2019, is ongoing.
Town of Vail Page 2
2702 Cortina Lane I Lot 12
Existing single-family dwelling constructed under Eagle County jurisdiction in 1972.
IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff finds the following provisions of the Vail Town Code relevant to the review of this
proposal:
Title 12 — Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code
Chapter 6, Article D. Two Family Primary/ Secondary Residential (PS) District (in part)
12-6D-1: PURPOSE.-
The
URPOSE:
The two-family primary/secondary residential district is intended to provide sites for
single-family residential uses or two-family residential uses in which one unit is a
larger primary residence and the second unit is a smaller caretaker apartment,
together with such public facilities as may appropriately be located in the same zone
district. The two-family primary/secondary residential district is intended to ensure
adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with
single-family and two-family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential
qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site development standards.
12-6D-2: PERMITTED USES.-
The
SES:
The following uses shall be permitted.-
Employee
ermitted:
Employee housing units, as further regulated by chapter 13 of this title.
Single-family residential dwellings
Two-family residential dwellings
12-6D-5: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS.-
The
IMENSIONS:
The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of
buildable area, and each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, eight feet
(80) on each side, within its boundaries.
12-6D-6: SETBACKS.-
Town
ETBACKS:
Town of Vail Page 3
In the primary/secondary residential district, the minimum front setback shall be
twenty feet (20'), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15'), and the
minimum rear setback shall be fifteen feet (15').
12-6D-8: DENSITY CONTROL:
A. Dwelling Units: Not more than a total of two (2) dwelling units shall be
permitted on each site with only one dwelling unit permitted on existing lots
less than fourteen thousand (14, 000) square feet.
1. Exception: Properties that meet all of the following three (3) conditions
shall be permitted a total of two (2) dwelling units on existing lots less
than fourteen thousand (14, 000) square feet.-
a.
eet:
a. The property was annexed into the town of Vail with two (2)
existing dwelling units on a lot less than fourteen thousand
(14, 000) square feet.
b. The property as of April 1, 2016, contained two (2) dwelling
units on a lot less than fourteen thousand (14,000) square feet.
c. At no time between the property's annexation and April 1, 2016,
did the property contain less than two (2) dwelling units.
2. Discontinuance of Exception: If at any time any property as described
above develops or redevelops with only one dwelling unit, this
exception for the allowance of two (2) units shall no longer be valid for
such property.
B. Gross Residential Floor Area.-
1.
rea:
1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on
each site.-
a.
ite:
a. Not more than forty six (46) square feet of gross residential floor
area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first
ten thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area, plus
b. Thirty eight (38) square feet of gross residential floor area
(GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area
over ten thousand (10,000) square feet, not exceeding fifteen
thousand (15, 000) square feet of site area, plus
c. Thirteen (13) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA)
for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen
Town of Vail Page 4
thousand (15, 000) square feet, not exceeding thirty thousand
(30, 000) square feet of site area, plus
d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for
each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of
thirty thousand (30, 000) square feet.
2. The secondary unit shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the
allowable gross residential floor area (GRFA).
C. Employee Housing Units: Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections A
and 8 of this section, a type I employee housing unit shall be permitted on
lots of less than fourteen thousand (14, 000) square feet in accordance with
the provisions of chapter 13 of this title. Any type 1 employee housing unit
existing on or before April 18, 2000, shall not be eliminated unless all dwelling
units are demolished, in which case the zoning on the property shall apply.
However, an existing type I employee housing unit may be replaced with a
type 11 employee housing unit on lots of fourteen thousand (14,000) square
feet or greater.
12-6D-9: SITE COVERAGE.-
Site
OVERAGE:
Site coverage shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total site area.
12-6D-10: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT:
At least sixty percent (60%) of each site shall be landscaped. The minimum of any
area qualifying as landscaping shall be ten feet (10) (width and length) with a
minimum area not less than three hundred (300) square feet.
12-6D-11: PARKING:
Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this title.
Title 13 — Subdivision Regulations, Vail Town Code
Chapter 1, General Provisions (in part)
13-1-2: PURPOSE.-
A.
URPOSE:
A. Statutory Authority: The subdivision regulations contained in this title have
been prepared and enacted in accordance with Colorado Revised Statutes
title 31, article 23, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety and welfare
of the present and future inhabitants of the town.
Town of Vail Page 5
B. Goals: To these ends, these regulations are intended to protect the
environment, to ensure efficient circulation, adequate improvements,
sufficient open space and in general, to assist the orderly, efficient and
integrated development of the town. These regulations also provide for the
proper arrangement of streets and ensure proper distribution of population.
The regulations also coordinate the need for public services with
governmental improvement programs. Standards for design and construction
of improvements are hereby set forth to ensure adequate and convenient
traffic circulation, utilities, emergency access, drainage, recreation and light
and air. Also intended is the improvement of land records and surveys, plans
and plats and to safeguard the interests of the public and subdivider and
provide consumer protection for the purchaser; and to regulate other matters
as the town planning and environmental commission and town council may
deem necessary in order to protect the best interests of the public.
C. Specific Purposes: These regulations are further intended to serve the
following specific purposes.-
1.
urposes:
1. To inform each subdivider of the standards and criteria by which
development proposals will be evaluated, and to provide information as
to the type and extent of improvements required.
2. To provide for the subdivision of property in the future without conflict
with development on adjacent land.
3. To protect and conserve the value of land throughout the municipality
and the value of buildings and improvements on the land.
4. To ensure that subdivision of property is in compliance with the town's
zoning ordinance, to achieve a harmonious, convenient, workable
relationship among land uses, consistent with town development
objectives.
5. To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide
adequate and efficient transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks,
playgrounds, recreation, and other public requirements and facilities
and generally to provide that public facilities will have sufficient
capacity to serve the proposed subdivision.
6. To provide for accurate legal descriptions of newly subdivided land and
to establish reasonable and desirable construction design standards
and procedures.
7. To prevent the pollution of air, streams and ponds, to assure adequacy
of drainage facilities, to safeguard the water table and to encourage
the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the
Town of Vail Page 6
town in order to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the
community and the value of the land.
13-1-3: COMPLIANCE.-
A.
OMPLIANCE:
A. General Prohibition: It is unlawful for any person, business, or corporation to
violate any of the provisions of this chapter or to transfer, sell, lease or agree
to sell or lease, any lot, tract, parcel, site, separate interest (including a
leasehold interest), interest in common, condominium interest, timeshare
estate, fractional fee, or timeshare license, or any other division within a
subdivision within the town until such subdivision has been approved in
writing by the administrator, planning and environmental commission and/or
the council (whichever is applicable) and a plat thereof recorded in the office
of the Eagle County clerk and recorder; provided, however, that a written
agreement to sell or lease which is expressly conditioned upon full
compliance by the seller with the subdivision regulations of the town within a
specified period of time and which expressly recites the seller's failure to
satisfy such condition within such period of time shall terminate the
agreement and entitle the buyer to the prompt return of all consideration
heretofore paid by the buyer under such agreement, shall not constitute a
violation of this subsection.
B. Prohibitive Conveyance: No lot or parcel of land, nor any interest therein,
shall be transferred, conveyed, sold, subdivided or acquired either in whole or
in part, so as to create a new nonconforming lot, or to avoid or circumvent or
subvert any provision of this chapter.
C. Responsibility: The owner, developer, buyer, or seller shall be fully
responsible for all acts of agents or employees thereof that are committed in
violation of the terms of this chapter.
Chapter 2, Definitions (in part)
SUBDIVISION OR SUBDIVIDED LAND.-
A.
AND:
A. Meaning.-
1.
eaning:
1. A tract of land which is divided into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels,
sites, separate interests (including leasehold interests), interests in
common, or other division for the purpose, whether immediate or
future, of transfer of ownership, or for building or other development, or
for street use by reference to such subdivision or recorded plat thereof;
or
2. A tract of land including land to be used for condominiums, timeshare
units, or fractional fee club units, or
Town of Vail Page 7
3. A house, condominium, apartment or other dwelling unit which is
divided into two (2) or more separate interests through division of the
fee or title thereto, whether by conveyance, license, lease, contract for
sale or any other method of disposition.
B. Exceptions: Unless the method of land disposition is adopted for the purpose
of evading this definition, the term "subdivision" as defined herein shall not
apply to any of the following divisions of land or interests in land.-
1.
and:
1. The division of land by order of any court in this state or by operation of
law.
2. The division of land by a lien, mortgage, deed of trust or any other
security instrument.
3. The division of land by a security or unit of interest in any investment
trust regulated under the laws of this state or any other interest in an
investment entity.
4. The division of land which creates an interest or interests in oil, gas or
minerals which are now or hereafter severed from the surface
ownership of real property.
5. The division of land by the acquisition of an interest in land in the name
of a husband and wife or other persons in joint tenancy or as tenants in
common and any such interest shall be deemed for purposes of this
definition as only one interest; provided, however, that no agreement
exists, either recorded or unrecorded, between the cotenants allowing
for the use and occupancy of the property by one or more cotenants to
the exclusion of one or more cotenants during any period, whether
annually recurring or not if such agreement is in any way binding or
effective upon any assignee or future owner of a fractional fee interest
or if such agreement continues to be in any way binding or effective
upon any cotenant for the sale of any interest in the property.
6. The division of land by reason of the dissolution of a joint venture or
business entity.
C. Compliance: No subdivision shall be approved which includes elements not in
conformance with the provisions of any applicable zoning ordinance or other
ordinance of the town or law or regulations of the state.
D. Major Subdivision: Any subdivision involving more than four (4) lots, or a
subdivision proposal without all lots having frontage on a public or approved
street, or with a request to extend municipal facilities in a significant manner,
Town of Vail Page 8
or a proposal which would negatively affect the natural environment as
determined under section 12-12-2, "Applicability", of this code, or if the
proposal would adversely affect the development of the remainder of the
parcel or adjoining property.
E. Minor Subdivision: Any subdivision containing not more than four (4) lots
fronting on an existing street, not involving any new street or road or the
extension of municipal facilities and not adversely affecting the development
of the remainder of the parcel or adjoining property.
F. Single -Family Subdivision: A subdivision of an existing lot, which is
recognized by the town of Vail as a legally subdivided lot, and which shall
contain a single-family or two-family dwelling. Each such dwelling shall be
separated from any other dwelling by space on all sides. For zoning
purposes, the lots created by a single-family subdivision shall be treated as
one lot.
Chapter 3, Section 4, Commission Review of Application, Criteria and Necessary
Findings.-
13-3-4.-
indings:
13-3-4: COMMISSION REVIEW OF APPLICATION; CRITERIA AND
NECESSARY FINDINGS
The planning and environmental commission shall conduct a public hearing on an
application for a preliminary plan for subdivision. The planning and environmental
commission shall consider the application, relevant additional materials, staff report
and recommendations as well as any other comments or public information given at
the hearing. The planning and environmental commission may discuss advisable
changes to the proposed subdivision with the applicant. The burden of proof shall
rest with the applicant to show that the application is in compliance with the intent
and purposes of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and other pertinent regulations
that the planning and environmental commission deems applicable. Due
consideration shall be given to the recommendations made by public agencies, utility
companies and other agencies consulted under subsection 13-3-C of this chapter.
A. Before recommending approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of
the preliminary plan, the planning and environmental commission shall
consider the following criteria with respect to the proposed subdivision.-
1.
ubdivision:
1. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is consistent with all the
applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies
outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the
development objectives of the town, and
2. The extent to which the proposed subdivision complies with all of the
standards of this title, as well as, but not limited to, title 12, "Zoning
Town of Vail Page 9
Regulations", of this code, and other pertinent regulations that the
planning and environmental commission deems applicable, and
3. The extent to which the proposed subdivision presents a harmonious,
convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with
municipal development objectives, and
4. The extent of the effects on the future development of the surrounding
area, and
5. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is located and designed
to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the
delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature
extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of
development; and
6. The extent to which the utility lines are sized to serve the planned
ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to
upgrade undersized lines, and
7. The extent to which the proposed subdivision provides for the growth
of an orderly viable community and serves the best interests of the
community as a whole, and
8. The extent to which the proposed subdivision results in adverse or
beneficial impacts on the natural environment, including, but not limited
to, water quality, air quality, noise, vegetation, riparian corridors,
hillsides and other desirable natural features, and
9. Such other factors and criteria as the commission and/or council deem
applicable to the proposed subdivision.
B. Necessary Findings: Before recommending and/or granting an approval of an
application for a major subdivision, the planning and environmental
commission shall make the following findings with respect to the proposed
major subdivision.-
1.
ubdivision:
1. That the subdivision is in compliance with the criteria listed in
subsection A of this section.
2. That the subdivision is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives
and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible
with the development objectives of the town.
3. That the subdivision is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses
and appropriate for the surrounding areas.
Town of Vail Page 10
4. That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general
welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious
development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its
natural environment and its established character as a resort and
residential community of the highest quality.
Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions (in part)
13-4-2: PROCEDURE:
The procedure for a minor subdivision shall be as follows.-
A.
ollows:
A. Submission of Proposal; Waiver Of Requirements: The subdivider shall
submit two (2) copies of the proposal following the requirements for a final
plat in subsection 13-3-68 of this title, with the provision that certain of these
requirements may be waived by the administrator and/or the planning and
environmental commission if determined not applicable to the project.
B. PEC Public Hearing: Within thirty (30) days of receiving the complete and
correct submittal for a minor subdivision, the planning and environmental
commission shall hold a public hearing to consider the final plat. The
administrator shall cause a copy of a notice of the time, place and general
nature of the hearing and proposal to be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the town at least fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing. Also,
adjacent property owners to the proposed subdivision shall be notified in
writing at least seven (7) days prior to the public hearing.
C. Review and Action on Plat: The planning and environmental commission shall
review the plat and associated materials and shall approve, approve with
modifications or disapprove the plat within twenty one (21) days of the first
public hearing on the minor subdivision or the minor subdivision will be
deemed approved. A longer time period for rendering a decision may be
granted subject to mutual agreement between the planning and
environmental commission and subdivider. The review shall be based on the
criteria and necessary findings in section 13-3-4 of this title.
D. Appeal: Within twenty (20) days the decision of the planning and
environmental commission on the final plat shall be transmitted to the council
by the staff. The council may call up the decision of the planning and
environmental commission within twenty (20) days of the planning and
environmental commission's action. If council appeals the planning and
environmental commission decision, the council shall hear substantially the
same presentation by the applicant as was heard at the planning and
environmental commission hearing(s). The council shall have thirty (30) days
to affirm, reverse, or affirm with modifications the planning and environmental
Town of Vail Page 11
V
commission decision, and the council shall conduct the appeal at a regularly
scheduled council meeting.
ZONING AND SITE ANALYSIS
Addresses:
Legal Descriptions:
Zoning:
Land Use Plan Designations
Current Land Uses:
Geological Hazards:
View Corridor:
2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 and 2702 Cortina Lane /
Lot 12
Vail Ridge, Lot 11/Lot 12, Block B
Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS)
Low Density Residential
Single-family residential
None
None
Development
Allowed /
Existing
Proposed
Change
Standard
Required
2698 Cortina Lane/Lot 11
Site Area
15,000 SF
15,951
15,951
0
Front: 20'
Front: >_20'
Front: >_20'
Setbacks
Sides: 15'
Side: >_15'
Side: >_15'
No Change**
Side: >_15'
Side: >_15'
Rear: 15'
Rear: >_15'
Rear: >_15'
Density (DUs)
Max. 2
2 DU
1 DU
No Change
1012 Eagles Nest Circle / Lot 2
Site Area
15,000 SF
14,675
14,675
0
Front — 20'
Front: >_20'
Front: >_20'
Setbacks
Sides — 15'
Side: 13.6'*
Side: >_15'
No Change
Rear — 15'
Side: >_15'
Side: >_15'
Rear: >_15'
Rear: >_15'
Density DUs
Max. 2
2 DU
1 DU
No Change
*The proposed lot line adjustment results in the removal of the nonconformity.
VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Existing Land Use: Zoning District:
North: Low Density Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential
South: Low Density Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential
East: Low Density Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential
West: Low Density Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential
Town of Vail Page 12
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
The following are review criteria for a minor subdivision, as outlined in Section 13-3-4,
Commission Review of Application; Criteria and Necessary Findings, Vail Town Code:
1. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is consistent with all the
applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in
the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development
objectives of the town; and
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable elements of
the adopted goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan
and is compatible with the development objectives of the town. While the
Comprehensive Plan is does not discuss single-family and duplex subdivisions in
great detail, Goal 1.3 of the Vail Land Use Plan states, "the quality of development
should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible." If approved, the proposed
reconfiguration would result in a more workable shared lot line.
Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion.
2. The extent to which the proposed subdivision complies with all of the
standards of this title, as well as, but not limited to, title 12, "Zoning
Regulations," of this code, and other pertinent regulations that the planning
and environmental commission deems applicable; and
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision is in compliance with all of the standards of
Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and Title 13, Subdivision Regulations,
Vail Town Code. As proposed, the two (2) development lots meet all development
standards for the Two -Family Primary/Secondary (PS) District.
Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion.
3. The extent to which the proposed subdivision presents a harmonious,
convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal
development objectives; and
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision presents a harmonious, convenient,
workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development
objectives. The proposed shared property line with associated private easements
will result in a more workable scenario for current and future owners. The proposed
subdivision will not negatively impact the existing relationship among land uses.
Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion.
4. The extent of the effects on the future development of the surrounding area;
and
Town of Vail Page 13
Staff finds that the proposed reconfiguration will have no negative impacts on the
future development of the surrounding area. Also, the surrounding area has been
developed and an alteration to a shared private property line between the subject
properties will not affect the surrounding area, now, or in the future.
Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion.
5. The extent to which the proposed subdivision is located and designed to
avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of
public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public
facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development; and
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not cause any inefficiency in the
delivery of public services, will not require duplication or premature extension of
public services, and will not result in a leapfrog development pattern because the
applicant is proposing a subdivision of existing platted lots already served by public
facilities.
Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion.
6. The extent to which the utility lines are sized to serve the planned ultimate
population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade
undersized lines; and
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision is already served by appropriately sized
utility lines, resulting in no future land disruptions to upgrade undersized lines.
Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion.
7. The extent to which the proposed subdivision provides for the growth of an
orderly viable community and serves the best interests of the community as a
whole; and
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision provides for the growth of an orderly viable
community and serves the best interests of the community as a whole, because
there will be no negative impact to the community as a whole while facilitating the
community's goal to allow for the maintenance and upgrading of existing
development within the Town.
Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion.
8. The extent to which the proposed subdivision results in adverse or beneficial
impacts on the natural environment, including, but not limited to, water
quality, air quality, noise, vegetation, riparian corridors, hillsides and other
desirable natural features; and
Town of Vail Page 14
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not result in any adverse impacts on the
natural environment, including, but not limited to, water quality, air quality, noise,
vegetation, riparian corridors, hillsides and other desirable natural features.
Staff finds the proposed subdivision meets this criterion.
9. Such other factors and criteria as the commission and/or council deem
applicable to the proposed subdivision.
VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends approval, of a final plat pursuant to Title 13, Chapter 4, Minor
Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the property line
between two (2) parcels located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and
at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this minor
subdivision, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning and
Environmental Commission pass the following motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request for
a final plat, pursuant to Title 13, Chapter 4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a subdivision to reconfigure the property line between two (2) parcels
located at 2698 Cortina Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane
/ Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and setting forth details in regard thereto."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this minor
subdivision, the Community Development Departments recommends the Planning and
Environmental Commission makes the following findings:
'Based upon a review of Section Vll of the July 27, 2020 staff memorandum to the
Planning and Environmental Commission, and the evidence and testimony presented,
the Planning and Environmental Commission finds.-
1.
inds:
1. That the subdivision is in compliance with the criteria listed in Section 13-3-4,
Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, and
2. That the subdivision is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies
outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development
objectives of the town,-
Town
own,
Town of Vail Page 15
3. That the subdivision is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and
appropriate for the surrounding areas, and
4. That the subdivision promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of
the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town
in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its
established character as a resort and residential community of the highest
quality."
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Proposed Plat of Subdivision, prepared by Gore Range Surveying, dated 6/15/2020
C. Exhibit demonstrating compliance with zoning standards.
Town of Vail Page 16
aoa
\ Aga
O
w
-
,q o
�oP
Aa
LL
�m
�1 TAT
Q OLu
Vo
v�o
LL-
Q�O�//��
W � z
apo
F--
J
Q
W>
ry
�
_
61
8
C
82 ff w8 - _oosw- 4z �8ze
m
o��
:E 8� - gooa amx - 38
8
V
I
d —
d >
O �
l7 VI
O
4
till 0
0
� W
g0(S-)
W
Z O Q
4 W
C) O 0
Z
Q �/5 0
W
J
Q
W
0
Z
W0
O
r
\ ,L£9£t
\ rr O W
O
00
ss
\ 00 Q �
S N �Q
0- \ 00~ cn o
Q0 z — w
\ :~u
N (/) � >- �
Qm Q
z
Wo I
C/-)
W �Q �
J o
y LLJ m
r�� �N U
WWLO
� ow �
� W
O 0
0
Z1
Ln� 9ZoS0 S
W, z~
U) > /
Qw N Sz o /
a- Q N w� / \
mQ /
w=0 n,n /
Qm Q LC)/// W Q0
w� z
c / zQ -z
~ Q O o
Jwm / m zD \
�m v / ��
Q QJ
I a_
/ W � n
SIN
N1 C:)
\
oz w =
i / J V) Q
O� U \
J / >
' \
L N
L
� N �
C/1) N
�J
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: July 27, 2020
ITEM/TOPIC:
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed regulation amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7
Amendment, Vail Town Code to amend Section 12-10 Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to refine the appropriate
sections to allow for a comprehensive approach to meeting the minimum parking requirements, including clarifying the review
process and other considerations, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0007)
The Applicant requests that this item be tabled to the next regularly scheduled meeting on August 10th, 2020.
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE:
ITEM/TOPIC: July 13, 2020 PEC Results
ATTACHMENTS:
File Name Description
Pec results 071320.pdf July 13, 2020 PEC Results
0 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
TOW?J OF ffl July 13, 2020, 1:00 PM
Town Council Chambers & Virtual
75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657
Call to Order
1. 1. Attendance
Present: Ludwig Kurz, Rollie Kjesbo, Brian Gillette, Karen Perez
Absent: John -Ryan Lockman, Pete Seibert, Henry Pratt
1.2. Register in advance for this webinar:
https://us02web.zoom. us/webinar/register/W N_ETcZHgnLS_6jd9wJ gxfQgA
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing
information about joining the webinar.
Main Agenda
2.1. A request for the review of a variance from Section 12-6D-8, Density
Control, Vail Town Code, to allow for a variance to the requirement that a
secondary unit in the Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential zone
district not exceed 40% of allowable site GRFA, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, located at 775
Potato Patch Drive/Lot 19, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch Filing 1, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC19-0050)
Applicant: Scott Ryan & Foster Gillett, represented by Mauriello Planning
Group
Planner: Erik Gates
Planner Gates gives a presentation on the application, going over the
variance requested, the previous meeting when this application was heard,
and the staff recommendation.
Kjesbo asks about the original development of the home when it comes to
which was the primary or secondary unit.
Gates responded affirmatively that the East unit was the primary when
developed.
Gillette asks for clarification on GRFA and how it is being divided between
the units. Asks for some history of the changes in the code that led to the
current situation.
Gates responds with some of the history and how it affected the home in
question.
Perez adds that a full understanding of the inequity is needed.
Dominic Mauriello, the applicant representative, goes over a presentation on
20 min.
the application
Gillette asks as to whether the property is double dipping by getting this
variance.
Maruiello says that the lot would not be double dipping, simply asking for the
currently allowed amount of GRFA to be used by either side.
Perez summarizes that this would be taking away the primary/secondary
part of this zoning.
Mauriello explains that this would not be a special privilege because what is
there today is an unintended consequence of that amendment.
Kjesbo asks if the west unit got the deduction for the basement.
Mauriello says that yes, it is the lower basement, so it got the deduction.
Because of this it got less GRFA and added to the inequity.
Kjesbo says the basement issue for duplexes was originally thought about in
the 2004 code, and nothing was different when this section was clarified in
2016.
Gillette says he is having a hard time finding the inequity in the current
situation.
Mauriello brings the conversation back to the intent of the 2004 change
Gillette says that they already took advantage of the pre code change
credits. Creating nonconformities happens and the other side got more
GRFA than they would have otherwise would have been allowed.
Perez says the whole point was to have consistency and you are asking us
to not have consistency. If we do this for one based on this situation then
we'd have to do it for everyone.
Gillette says that the 2016 basement clarification was always enforced and
that the clarification was solidified at that point.
Mauriello restates his argument that one of the units got shorted out of
GRFA with the change when it was approved.
Gillette says the original intent of the 40/60 was to have the smaller side be a
caretaker unit and not a smaller side of the duplex
No public comment at this time. Ludwig closes the public comment. No final
comments from staff or applicant.
Final discussion from commissioners:
Gillette asks for clarity from staff on recommendation.
Gates responds that it was based on loss of any development potential as a
direct result of code change, but believes that PEC is valid in their viewpoint
of preserving the 60/40 split.
Gillette asks for clarification on if double dipping or not
Gates said it does not seem like double dipping, there is development left.
They would not be getting anything additional.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to deny. Karen Perez seconded the motion and it
passed (4-0).
Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert
2.2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed 90 min.
regulation amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Vail Town
Code to amend Section 12-10 Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town
Code, to refine the appropriate sections to allow for a comprehensive
approach to meeting the minimum parking requirements, including clarifying
the review process and other considerations, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. (PEC20-0007)
Applicant: Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Greg Roy
Planner Roy began by describing how this amendment was brought up in
the first place. I n the last meeting a few options were discussed for parking
solutions for developments with additions that cannot add new parking. The
first time this issue was brought up, the PEC recommended a more
comprehensive approach to fixing parking standards. The current proposed
changes include: increasing the distance that would qualify for off-site
parking, combine the pay -in -lieu parking zone with the core parking area
map, expand what the current parking fund can be used for, and create a
secondary pay -in -lieu zone that would focus on zones with more of a mix of
vehicular and pedestrian access.
Tom Braun spoke about the previous meetings related to this parking issue
which was to provide and outlet for properties in Lionshead and vail village
that are outside the defined pay -in -lieu parking area. Braun then showed the
current pay -in -lieu map. Properties within the pay -in -lieu zones can only
pay into this fee to provide for their parking. Trying to find some relief for
properties that also cannot build more parking for additions but are not within
this defined zone. Braun then identified additional properties that could be a
part of the pay -in -lieu based on their adjacency to pedestrian only areas.
Braun described this as the foundation for the current code changes.
Current code allows any property outside the pay -in -lieu zone to apply for
the pay -in -lieu option to the PEC. Felt this is problematic and too broad.
Braun then showed a map of the proposed secondary pay -in -lieu zone,
which would be a zone allowed to ask the PEC to use the pay -in -lieu fund.
Braun then listed some parameters for this request. Additions to existing
properties should be considered for the pay -in -lieu. Demo/rebuilds should
have access to provide new parking so they would not qualify. This should
not be used as a way to eliminate existing parking to provide more
development area. Applicants for this secondary district must provide
evidence for the need to utilize the pay -in -lieu.
This proposal also would allow the pay -in -lieu funds to be used for multi-
modal transportation improvements.
Currently commercial uses in the pay -in -lieu zone are not required to
provide parking or funds. This proposal would define lodge rooms as
commercial uses. If the town would waive the fee for restaurants and other
commercial uses, why would it not waive it for lodging as well?
Braun discussed a study of uses in this zone and their would-be parking
requirements. Found that the town provided parking that would be utilized by
these uses only accounts for about 40% of the available public parking. Most
of the parking issue within the town is from day-trippers to the town.
In addressing concerns related these changes overcrowding existing
parking structures, Braun stated that most projects within the core area have
been additions. These have been very small additions and are unlikely to
result in a large influx of parking need.
In addressing why lodges should be considered exempt, Braun stated that
again the additions historically and in the future, based on current build out,
are very small.
Commissioner Gillette: Asked if the town had seen any benefit from
exempting retail and restaurants.
Braun: Thinks that the town has seen benefit from this incentive. I n
discussing the load on the parking garages, thought the impact would be
small and that the Town should be prioritizing those who are spending an
extended period of time in Vail rather than day -trips from the front range.
Braun ended his presentation by saying that if no change is made then you
will likely see very little development investment in the core areas outside the
pay -in -lieu area due to the burden of parking.
Chairman Kurz: One concern the PEC had in April was about the length of
the lease for parking spaces. Why was that not addressed in this proposal.
Braun: We saw some language in the code that we felt needed to be fixed
and wanted to address these issues first. The town still has control over what
terms it wants to see in these leases.
Gillette: When this was first being discussed, there was a property that could
not build its third parking level for groundwater reasons. The PEC let them
use pay -in -lieu, but with this proposal that would not be allowed because that
property was a demo/rebuild. Wants to look more into the need to exempt
lodges and retail. Also wants to know why the fee only accounts for 1/3rd of
a parking spot. Thinks the fee should be equivalent to the cost of a parking
space. Wants to know the benefit the town gets and the benefit the town is
providing in more detail.
Braun: In clarifying the situation for the development in need of pay -in -lieu,
they were granted a onetime use of the pay -in -lieu.
Gillette: But we still wouldn't have been able to grant that under these new
regulations correct?
Roy: Believes we could allow for that sort of thing through a variance
process.
Perez: Wants staff to confirm that this is an option. Worried about opening
the flood gates for this sort of variance. Worried about writing ourselves out
of a solution avenue.
Gillette: Still has an issue with exempting certain uses. If they cannot provide
an additional parking space then they should have the option to request use
of pay -in -lieu at the least.
Braun: We developed these changes based on the purpose of the existing
parking regulations. There is still a special exemption through the PEC that
could still be allowed for properties outside the Vail core.
Gillette: Wants something addressing variance language. Wants no
exemptions on any property, Council can change this if they want to. Wants
to set the pay -in -lieu fee at the cost of a parking space
Braun: Offered a cost -benefit analysis to support for the current fee price
and for the exemption of lodge units.
Gillette: That would help.
Perez: Wants to go through the changes section by section.
Kjesbo: In favor of expanding the pay -in -lieu zone. Also wants to increase
the fee in conjunction. Thinks there still needs to be a pay -in -lieu or parking
requirement for lodge units.
Perez: Agrees with Gillette and Kjesbo. Asked for clarification on certain
proposed changes. Wanted clarification on why a section related to loading
requirements was removed.
Braun: We intended to remove all references to loading requirements in the
parking requirements.
Perez: But loading is still a part of parking, so loading needs to be
addressed as well.
Braun: Could not find a reason for including reference to loading in these
sections.
Perez: Concerned about why there was a section making reference to the
fee without referencing when the fee is due.
Spence: We generally do not include due dates for fees within the code
because this is an administrative function. We require these fees at the
building permit.
Perez: Questions the need to remove PEC purview related to where off-site
parking will be located. The changes would have the PEC just look to see if
the proposed parking is within a quarter mile with no flexibility or digression
in their review.
Kurz: Also feels that the pay -in -lieu should reflect the cost of a parking
space rather than simply a number picked out of the blue. Asked the
applicant and staff come up with some compromises to address the PEC
comments.
Gillette: Could see future staff reading these changes and determining that
pay -in -lieu is not available to anyone outside of the core of Vail, even with
PEC review. This should not be the intent.
Public Comment
Dominic Mauriello: Thankful that these old code sections are being looked
at. Had a question about the distance required for off-site parking. Felt that
the quarter -mile language was more applicable for discussing the walkability
of Vail Village in ski boots. Thinks that this distance should be more flexible
due to the presence of free shuttles and ability for developments to provide
shuttles to off-site parking. Also had a concern about the barring of
demo/rebuilds for the pay -in -lieu area. Felt that requiring the fee be equal to
a parking space would hamper development. Small additions could generate
hundreds of thousands in revenue but would have a hard time being built if
they had to provide the full up -front cost of a parking spot.
Gillette: This is why a cost -benefit analysis would be helpful.
Braun: Requested a tabling.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to table to July 27, 2020. Brian Gillette seconded the
motion and it passed (4-0).
Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert
3. Approval of Minutes
3.1. June 22, 2020 PEC Results
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (4-0).
Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert
4. 1 nformational Update
4.1. West Vail Master Plan Update
Applicant:
Planner: Matt Gennett
Gennett gives an update of the process the West Vail Master Plan
Committee has been up to at this point. Provides dates and efforts planned
for future meetings, deadlines, projects, reports, outreach, and focus
groups. A short run-through of the EngageVail website was done.
Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert
5. Adjournment
Rollie Kjesbo moved to adjourn. Karen Perez seconded the motion and it
passed (4-0).
Absent: (3) Lockman, Pratt, Seibert
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the
Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project
orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the
Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Please
call 711 for sign language interpretation 48 hour prior to meeting time.
Community Development Department
Ad #: 0000602473-01
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM DEVLM
Your account number is: 1023233
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
VAIL DAILY
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
I, Mark Wurzer, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of
the VAIL DAILY, that the same daily newspaper printed, in
whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle,
State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein;
that said newspaper has been published continuously and
uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the
first publication of the annexed legal notice or
advertisement and that said newspaper has published the
requested legal notice and advertisement as requested.
The VAIL DAILY is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only forjurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every number
of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and
that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of
said newspaper dated 7/24/2020 and that the last
publication of said notice was dated 7/24/2020 in the issue
of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
8/11/2020.
Mark Wurzer. Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and
for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day
8/11/2020.
Holly Hunter, Notary Public
My Commission Expires: August 19, 2021
nor r HudTl;q
k—P J
pg,]
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION
July 27, 2020, 1:00 PM
Virtual
75S. Frontage Road - Vell, C—mclo, 8165/
Call to Order
1.1. Reginter inadvance for this —bin-https://usD2u b.m m.mAM bi,wlregister/
W NyF_16X_W S3gCtHLbMRr_llw
After registering, ycu will receive a confin-uw-email mntaning information
bout joining the webinar.
1.2. Adendance
2. Man Agenda
2.1. A request for review cf a final plat, pursuant to TMIe 13 Chapter 4, Minor
Subdivisions, Vail Town Cotle, m allow br a subdivision to reconfigure the
properly line between two (2) parcels located x12698 Canna Lane / Lot 11
Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Cortina Lane / Lot 12 Block B, Vail Ridge, and
setting torch details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0013) 10 in
Applicant: Benno Scheidegger, represented by Gae Range Surveying LLC
Planner: Jonathan Spence
2.2. Arequestfora mcommendafionlothe Vail Town Coundlforapresaibed
reguletlon amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Veil Town Code
,o=Section 12-10 Oh Skeet Parking and Loading, Vall Town Code, to
refine the apprgxiate sections to allow for a wmprehensi,a approach W
meeting the minimum parking requirements, mdudi darilying thereview
process anolhar consideretions, and setfing iMh details in regartl ihereb.
IPEC20-0007) 45 in.
PPanGmunRAssociates,
3. Approval of Minutes reg oy
3.1. July 13, 2020 PEC Results
4. Adjourn—
The applications and Information about the p opo als are availablefor p blic Inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Depadment, 75 South Frontage Roatl. TM1e
public is invited to attend the p,cjed orientation and the site visits that precede Ne public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Tines and adar cd items we approximate, subjectW
change, and cannot be relied uponto dalermine at whet time the Planning am EnNrc nd.1 Commisslon
will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for add hional information. Please call 711 for sign lav -
g age inteMnelation 48 hour prior W meeting time.
Cor munity Development Department Published in the Vail Daily July 24, 2020. 0000602473
Ad #: 0000598889-01
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM DEVLM
Your account number is: 1023233
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
VAIL DAILY
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
I, Mark Wurzer, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of
the VAIL DAILY, that the same daily newspaper printed, in
whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle,
State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein;
that said newspaper has been published continuously and
uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the
first publication of the annexed legal notice or
advertisement and that said newspaper has published the
requested legal notice and advertisement as requested.
The VAIL DAILY is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only forjurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every number
of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and
that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of
said newspaper dated 7/10/2020 and that the last
publication of said notice was dated 7/10/2020 in the issue
of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
7/31/2020.
Mark Wurzer. Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and
for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day
7/31/2020.
Jerilynn Medina, Notary Public
My Commission Expires: August 3, 2020
.1Er�E �YM!J MEp!Rd�S
FiATf Dtcutnzoo
NOTMZY lil2gir�079i9g
u`/vCfi%¢CGON:Xi'IRI:GAk3Gil57et.26x'
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will
hold a public hearing in accordance wilh section t Vail Town Code, on July 27, 2020 a11:00 pm In
the Town of Vail Munidpal Building.
Regis=er in advance for =his webinar:
Mips://us02web.zoom.usrWebinar/reoisferAVN_vF_18 WS3oCWLN9Rr_U.
After registering, you will receive a confirtnatlon email cortshing information about joining the wabinar.
A request for review of a final plat, pant to Tule 13 Chapter 4, Minor SubdMalons, Veil Town Coda, to
Ilow for a subtlivision to reconfigure the property line belweon two (21 parcels located at 2698 Cortina
Lane / Lot 11 Block B, Vail Ridge, and at 2702 Corina Lane I Lot 12 Block B, Vol Ridge, and setting forth
details in raged thereto (PEC20-0013)
Appll—t Benno Scheidegger, represented Gore Range Surveying LLC
Planner: Jonathan Spence
A repot to the PEC agading an administrative approval of a Conditional Use Permit amendment, pur-
gant to rte 12, Chapter 16, Amendment Procedures, Van Town Coda, to allow for a 610 square foot ex-
pansion to Donovan Pavilion for ad,uh-al storage, a kitchen prep space, and an uh—lbdde room located
11600 S. Frontage Road W. / Unplattad—Donovan Park, and setting loth usual. in regal thereto.
(PEC20-0014)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by TAB Associates
Planner: Erik Gates
The applications and iniorma=bn about=he proposals ea"Aa
for public Inspection tluring oiHw hours
a1 the Town of Vall Community Development DepatmeM, ]5 South Fron=age Roatl. The pudic Is Irwlted
to anentl site visits. Please ca11970-479-2138 or visb www.vailgov coon/planningfor a ddivonalinformahion.
Sign language interpretation available upon request wilh 24-hour notticaton, dial 711
Pub r—d! July 10, 2020 in the Vail DWIV. 0000598889