HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-11-23 PEC0 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
TOW?J OF ffl November 23, 2020, 1:00 PM
Virtual
75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657
Call to Order
1. 1. Attendance
Present: Ludwig Kurz, Karen Perez, Rollie Kjesbo, Brian Gillette, Henry
Pratt, Pete Seibert, John -Ryan Lockman
Absent: None
1.2. Register in advance for this webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN—OrWQfmXPQNKhrKl MdNsXEg
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing
information about joining the webinar.
Main Agenda
2.1. A request for the review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 20 min.
12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow Funiculars and
other similar conveyances, a Conditional Use in the Two -Family
Primary/Secondary (PS) District, located at 696 Forest Road/Lot 8, Block
1, Vail Village Filing 6, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-
0024)
Applicant: LSC 27 LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: Jonathan Spence
1. The applicant shall obtain DRB approval prior to making an
application for a building permit.
Planner Spence provided a short recap of the history of the application that
the PEC has seen so far and introduces the applicants.
Dominic Mauriello of Mauriello Planning Group does a presentation of the
application and goes over the general CUP criteria for approval and the
criteria associated with the Funicular Conditional Use.
Kurz expresses his concern that the recreational facility was approved prior
to the CUP application and almost requires approval of this funicular for the
recreation facility to be usable. The area is ripe for funiculars due to location
and could open the door for many more applications in the future. Why was
this not included in the original application?
Michael Suman says that it was originally proposed but was not included in
the original application for approval because the code changes that needed
to be approved before it was feasible. The DRB did review all of these items
at one time but could not approve the funicular because of the lack of CUP
in hand.
Mauriello adds that funiculars were allowed as an accessory use up until
2008 and there were still only four built in the history of the town. The
expense and practicality are not doable for a lot of these lots.
Kurz expressed his concern about setting a precedent for the future.
Mauriello adds that the Town approved of these in the future if criteria are
met with the passage of the recent code change by Town Council.
Suman pointed out that they must have a structure to access in order to
meet the CUP criteria and a lot of the lots in the area don't have the space to
add a structure.
Lockman questions the location of the rec center to the bike trail in the area.
Suman says the rec center is 50 feet below the bike trail.
No public comment.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve with conditions. Pete Seibert seconded the
motion and it passed (6-1).
Ayes: (6) Gillette, Kjesbo, Lockman, Perez, Pratt, Seibert
Nays: (1) Kurz
2.2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a Prescribed 2 min.
Regulation Amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Vail Town
Code to amend Section 12-23-6: Methods of Mitigation and Section 12-24-
6: Methods of Mitigation, Vail Town Code, to update the Payment of Fees in
Lieu provisions of Commercial Linkage and I nclusionary Zoning, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0027)
The applicant has requested this item be tabled to December 14, 2020.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by George Ruther
Planner:
Rollie Kjesbo moved to table to December 14, 2020. Karen Perez seconded
the motion and it passed (7-0).
2.3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to establish a new 2 min.
Special Development District, (Alura Vail), pursuant to Section 12-9-A
Special Development (SDD) District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the
development of 24 multifamily residential units in eight (8) buildings with
associated site improvements, located at 1472 Matterhorn Circle/Vail Park
Meadows Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-
0028)
The applicant has requested this item be tabled to December 14, 2020.
Applicant: Alura Vail LLC, represented by The Brown Studio
Planner: Jonathan Spence
Rollie Kjesbo moved to table to December 14, 2020. Karen Perez seconded
the motion and it passed (6-0).
Abstain: (1) Pratt
3. Approval of Minutes
3.1. October 26, 2020 PEC Results
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (6-0).
Abstain: (1) Pratt
4. Adjournment
Karen Perez moved to adjourn. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (7-0).
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the
Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project
orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the
Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Please
call 711 for sign language interpretation 48 hour prior to meeting time.
Community Development Department
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE:
ITEM/TOPIC: Attendance
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE:
ITEM/TOPIC:
Register in advance for this webinar:
https:Hus02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN OrWQfmXPQNKhrK1MdNsXEg
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information aboutjoining the webinar.
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: November 23, 2020
ITEM/TOPIC:
A request for the review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow
Funiculars and other similar conveyances, a Conditional Use in the Two -Family Primary/Secondary (PS) District, located at 696
Forest Road/Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0024)
ATTACHMENTS:
File Name Description
PEC20-0024 CUP Funicular Staff Memorandum pdf Staff Memorandum
Attachment A. Applicant s Narrative dated November 11 2020. Pd f Attachment A. Applicant's Narrative dated August 11, 2020
0
rowN nFvaiL
Memorandum
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: November 23, 2020
SUBJECT: A request for the review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-16,
Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow Funiculars and other similar
conveyances, a Conditional Use in the Two -Family Primary/Secondary (PS)
District, located at 696 Forest Road/Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0024)
Applicant: LSC 27 LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: Jonathan Spence
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, LSC 27 LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, has requested
the review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-16, Conditional Use
Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow Funiculars and other similar conveyances, a
Conditional Use in the Two -Family Primary/Secondary (PS) District, located at 696
Forest Road. The proposed funicular allows residents and guests of the home to access
an approved recreational facility located on the southern portion of the lot.
Based upon staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends approval, with a condition, of this application, subject to the findings
noted in Section VIII of this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicant is requesting the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the
installation of a 6 -person funicular to access an accessory recreational facility at 696
Forest Road. The proposed funicular will be architecturally compatible with the home
and recreational facility and will travel on two bronze rails. The funicular will be powered
by an electric motor and has been sited to follow the existing staircase. The staircase
and funicular were laid out to blend with the topography and vegetation on the site with
tree removal minimized. Please see the applicant's narrative provided with this
memorandum as Attachment A for additional details on the proposal.
III. BACKGROUND
Prior to 2003, the use of funiculars and other similar conveyances was an accessory
use in residential zone districts. As an accessory use (customary and incidental to
permitted uses) review was limited to the Design Review Board (DRB) with no specific
criteria.
In 2003 the use was reclassified as a Conditional Use with Use Specific Criteria, via
Ordinance No. 33, Series of 2003. The Use Specific Criteria was modified by the Town
Council, following a recommendation from the Planning and Environmental
Commission, via Ordinance No, 16, 2020. The modification has permitted this
application to proceed through the review process.
IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff finds the following provisions of the Vail Town Code relevant to the review of this
proposal:
CHAPTER 16 — CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (in part)
12-16-1: PURPOSE; LIMITATIONS:
In order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title,
specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional
use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require
review and evaluation so that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes
of this title and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. The review
process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious
development between conditional uses and surrounding properties and the town at
large. Uses listed as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to
such conditions and limitations as the town may prescribe to ensure that the location
and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with development objectives
of the town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions
cannot be devised to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permits
shall be denied. (Ord. 8(1973) § 18.100)
12-16-5: PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION:
A. Possible Range Of Action: Within thirty (30) days of the application for a public
hearing on a conditional use permit, the planning and environmental commission shall
act on the application. The commission may approve the application as submitted or
may approve the application subject to such modifications or conditions as it deems
necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or the commission may deny the
application. A conditional use permit may be revocable, may be granted for a limited
time period, or may be granted subject to such other conditions as the commission may
prescribe. Conditions may include, but shall not be limited to, requiring special setbacks,
open spaces, fences or walls, landscaping or screening, and street dedication and
improvement; regulation of vehicular access and parking, signs, illumination, and hours
and methods of operation, control of potential nuisances, prescription of standards for
maintenance of buildings and grounds, and prescription of development schedules.
B. Variances: A conditional use permit shall not grant variances, but action on a
variance may be considered concurrently with a conditional use permit application on
the same site. Variances shall be granted in accordance with the procedure prescribed
in chapter 17 of this title. (Ord. 29(2005) § 38: Ord. 16(1978) § 4(b): Ord. 8(1973)
§ 18.500)
12-16-6: CRITERIA; FINDINGS:
A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the
planning and environmental commission shall consider the following factors with
respect to the proposed use.-
1.
se:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the town
2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public
facilities and public facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be
located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the
proposed use.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an
environmental impact report is required by chapter 12 of this title.
B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall make the
following findings before granting a conditional use permit:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of
this title and the purposes of the zone district in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would
be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of
this title. (Ord. 29(2005) § 38: Ord. 10(1998) § 9: Ord. 22(1996) § 3: Ord.
36(1980) § 1: Ord. 8(1973) § 18.600)
3
12-16-7 Use Specific Criteria and Standards
The following criteria and standards shall be applicable to the uses listed below in
consideration of a conditional use permit. These criteria and standards shall be in
addition to the criteria and findings required by section 12-16-6 of this chapter.
11. Funiculars and other similar conveyances.-
a.
onveyances:
a. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when
designed for the purpose of providing pedestrian or vehicular access to a
residential dwelling, an accessory structure, or recreation facility/structure, as
determined by the planning and environmental commission.
b. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when
significant site constraints prevent conventional means of pedestrian or
vehicular access to the residential dwelling, an accessory structure, or
recreation facility/structure, as determined by the planning and environmental
commission. "Significant site constraints" shall be defined as natural features
such as mature trees, natural drainages, stream courses, and other natural
water features, rock outcroppings, wetlands, excessive slopes, other natural
features, and existing structures that may create practical difficulties in the site
planning and development of the lot.
c. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when
designed to be compatible with both the site upon which they are located and
the residential dwelling to which they provide access, as determined by the
planning and environmental commission.
d. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when
designed to be appropriately screened.
12-16-8: PERMIT APPROVAL AND EFFECT:
Approval of a conditional use permit, or an amendment to an existing conditional use
permit, shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and construction
not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion or the use for which the
approval has been granted has not commenced within two (2) years from when the
approval becomes final. Approval of a conditional use permit shall also lapse and
become void if the use for which the approval has been granted is discontinued for a
period of two (2) years, regardless of any intent to resume operation of the use. (Ord.
12(2008) § 26)
12-16-9: CONFLICTING PROVISIONS:
In addition to the conditions which may be prescribed pursuant to this chapter, a
conditional use shall also be subject to all other procedures, permits, and requirements
0
of this chapter and other applicable ordinances and regulations of the town. In the event
of any conflict between the provisions of a conditional use permit and any other permit
or requirement, the more restrictive provision shall prevail. (Ord. 10(1998) § 10: Ord.
8(1973) § 18.900)
V. ZONING ANALYSIS
Addresses:
Legal Descriptions:
Zoning:
Land Use Plan Designations
Current Land Uses:
Geological Hazards:
View Corridor:
696 Forest Road
Vail Village Filing 6, Lot 8/Block 1
Two -Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS)
Low Density Residential
Single-family residential
Steep Slopes
None
VI. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Existing Land Use: Zoning District:
North: Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary (P/S) District
South: Ski Resort U.S. Forest Service
East: Fire Station Two -Family Primary/Secondary (P/S) District
West: Residential Two -Family Primary/Secondary (P/S) District
VII. REVIEW CRITERIA— CONDITIONAL USE
12-16-6: CRITERIA; FINDINGS
Before acting on a Conditional Use Permit application, the Planning and Environmental
Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town.
The proposed text amendment is compatible with the development objectives of the town
and speaks to the origins of Vail and its Tyrolean roots. The following are relevant goals
of the Town's Comprehensive Plan:
Vail Land Use Plan:
•
Goal 1.1. Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment,
maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to
serve both the visitor and the permanent resident.
• Goal 1.3. The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded
whenever possible.
5
• Goal 1.6. Development proposals on the hillsides should be evaluated on a
case by case basis.
Limited development may be permitted for some low intensity uses in areas that
are not highly visible from the Valley floor. New projects should be carefully
controlled and developed with sensitivity to the environment.
• Goal 2.1. The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort
while accommodating day visitors.
vagi 9n/9n
• Sense of Place and Character: Vail values the strong history of the town and its
unique character and legacy while acknowledging the importance of reinvention.
This is reflected in the high quality of the built environment with design and
features that endure over time.
The proposed funicular is compatible with these goals and furthers the development
objectives of the Town of Vail, as applicable.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public
facilities needs.
The proposed conditional use will have no effect on light and air, distribution of
population, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, or other public facility needs.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas.
There will be no effect on traffic or automotive or pedestrian safety as this use is entirely
within a private residential lot.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be
located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses.
The proposed funicular with have a minimal effect on the character of the area. The
funicular is designed to be largely screened from adjacent properties, taking advantage
of extensive existing vegetation. The funicular itself will be designed to be compatible
A
architecturally with other improvements on the property and the noise generated is
significantly below sound limitations.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the
proposed use.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an
environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this title.
An environmental impact report is not required for the proposed development.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be not applicable.
12-16-7 Use Specific Criteria and Standards
11. Funiculars and other similar conveyances:
a. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when
designed for the purpose of providing pedestrian access to a residential
dwelling, an accessory structure, or recreation facility/structure, as
determined by the planning and environmental commission.
The proposed funicular is specifically designed for providing pedestrian access
to a recreational structure, that is currently under construction.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
b. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when
significant site constraints prevent conventional means of vehicular
access to the residential dwelling, an accessory structure, or recreation
facility/structure, as determined by the planning and environmental
commission. "Significant site constraints" shall be defined as natural
features such as mature trees, natural drainages, stream courses, and
other natural water features, rock outcroppings, wetlands, excessive
slopes, other natural features, and existing structures that may create
practical difficulties in the site planning and development of the lot.
The new recreational facility is inaccessible by vehicles due to significant
excessive slopes and the prevalence of mature trees on the property.
Vehicular access would result in substantial and unwanted site disturbance.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
7
c. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when
designed to be compatible with both the site upon which they are located
and the residential dwelling to which they provide access, as determined
by the planning and environmental commission.
The proposed funicular is designed to be compatible with the site and the
surrounding area. The proposed 6 -person funicular will match the architecture
of the home and will blend into the environment. The track follows the
topography of the site, remaining within 4' to 7' from the ground.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
d. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when
designed to be appropriately screened.
The proposed funicular is designed to be screened from adjacent properties,
including the ski area located to the south. Significant existing vegetation
assists in screening the funicular cabin and related tracks. Further review of
the proposed funicular by the DRB is required, as conditioned, that may result
in additional screening requirements.
The Community Development Department finds this criterion to be met.
VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission approve a Conditional Use
Permit, with a condition, pursuant to Section 12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town
Code, to allow Funiculars and other similar conveyances, a Conditional Use in the Two -
Family Primary/Secondary (PS) District, located at 696 Forest Road/Lot 8, Block 1, Vail
Village Filing 6, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this
application, with a condition, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission pass the following motion:
"The Planning and Environmental Commission approve, with a condition, the
applicants' request for a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Title 12, Chapter 16,
Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow Funiculars and other similar
conveyances, a Conditional Use in the Two -Family Primary/Secondary (PS)
District, located at 696 Forest Road/Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6, and
setting forth details in regard thereto."
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve, with
conditions, this request, the Community Development Department recommends the
0
Commission applies the following condition:
1. Approval of this conditional use permit is contingent upon the applicant
obtaining Design Review Board (DRB) approval prior to submitting an
application for an associated building permit.
Should the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve
the Conditional Use Permit, the Community Development Department recommends the
Commission makes the following findings:
"Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section Vll of the staff
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated November
237 2020, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and
Environmental Commission finds
That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of
Title 12, Vail Town Code, and the purposes of the zone district in which the
site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would
be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of
this title."
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Applicant's Narrative dated August 17, 2020
9
696 FOREST ROAD
Conditional Use Permit to Allow for a
Funicular
Location: 696 Forest Road / 2101-072-11-038
LOT 8, BLOCK 1, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 6
SOMAN
Date Submitted: August 17, 2020
Revised November 11, 2020 V
Mauriello Planning Group
INTRODUCTION
The owners of 696 Forest Road / Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6, LSC 27 LLC, are
requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a funicular. The property is zoned Two -Family
Primary/Secondary Residential, and "funiculars" are allowed as a conditional use by Section
12-6D-3: Conditional Uses. There are additional criteria provided in Section 12-16-7: Use
Specific Criteria and Standards.
The applicants have been approved to
construct a recreation facility, which
includes ski lockers and indoor
recreational uses in a structure with a
745 sq. ft. footprint and exterior
swimming pool. The recreation facility
was originally approved on March 4,
2020, and construction began in July of
2020. The facility is proposed to be
accessed via a funicular and a set of
stairs.
The Town Code defines a funicular (and
similar conveyances) as:
■�c�r Evac.-ata.-ra�rs r�r�• -oma. -
Current construction at 696 Forest Rd.
Exterior, tramlike vehicles, designed to move up and down steep slopes by use of rails
or tracks.
The Town Code distinguishes funiculars from ski lifts and tows as two separate uses within the
Code. A ski lift and tow are not subject to use specific criteria that are applicable to a funicular.
The proposed funicular is a 6 -seater cab that is customized to match the architecture and
materials of the home. The intent is that the cab will match the architecture of the home and
will generally blend into the environment. The track is also proposed to be bronze, and varies in
height between 4 ft. to 7 ft. off the ground to allow for snow clearance. The total length of track
is 260 ft., and it will climb 105 ft. of elevation. The cab is driven by an electric variable speed
motor at the top, which uses a cable and drum system, so noise is minimal, and well below the
Town's noise standards.
Page 2 of 15
Proposed funicular cab. The cab will be customized to match the materials of the home. The materials used on
the home will be used on the funicular, including timber siding, bronze frame, and copper metal shingles.
I i Tui 11� ulc l a u�111 dui vviuii iy �QQ w u is i i ou U� LUI c, Zvi v i vI cQL i 1v
Page 3 of 15
Iz
S
NEW COPPER METAL SH NGLE
FINISH ON HIP ROOF TO MATCH
STRUCTURES • NATURAL PATINA
OVERHANG AROUND PERIMETER
f
a,
OF CAB
DARK BRONZE PANTED METAL
I
T YP-
ENCLOSCAB WITH
NCL
EEDD
SEE-THROUGH POLYCARBOMATE
PANELS
f
4
r.
MONTANA RMBER SIDING TO
MATCHSTRUCTURES
BENCH SEATING
\
\
FINISFIED IERRACElPLATFORM
HE
UPHILLSIDE
d, 7W
DOWNHILLSIDE
CUSTOM %L
FUNICULAR CAB
5
FUNICULAR CAB SIDE ELEVATION
A711
SCALE: 112' = V-0"
Proposed funicular cab. The cab will be customized to match the materials of the home. The materials used on
the home will be used on the funicular, including timber siding, bronze frame, and copper metal shingles.
I i Tui 11� ulc l a u�111 dui vviuii iy �QQ w u is i i ou U� LUI c, Zvi v i vI cQL i 1v
Page 3 of 15
BACKGROUND
Funiculars have been used as a popular
solution to moving people and freight up
and down steep terrain since the 1860s.
While many funicular systems are public
methods of transportation, in mountain
and resort communities, funicular
systems have been privately developed
as a method to overcome issues of
connectivity where terrain prohibits the
ability for pedestrians or vehicles to
achieve access. For example, there are a
couple of private funiculars in Telluride.
Private funiculars are also popular in some
lakeside resort communities to provide
access down to the waterfront.
In the Town of Vail prior to 2003,
funiculars were approved as an accessory
use to residential dwelling units. This
means that there was no review required
beyond Design Review. There have been
a few funiculars constructed in the Town
of Vail.
There are two private funiculars currently
in the Town of Vail. Both of these were
constructed prior to 2003, and no new
Six -person funicular at Element 52 in Telluride, CO
.
�tl
Small funicular providing access from a private residence
down to the waterfront.
funiculars have been constructed since.
There was previously a funicular in East Vail at 4842 Meadow Lane, however, this one was
demolished as part of a demo/rebuild in 2015 so there is little available information on it. In
addition, there is a private gondola that was constructed in the late 1980s, but a gondola is
Page 4 of 15
considered a ski lift and listed separately from funiculars. The existing funiculars and the private
gondola are described in additional detail below:
2701 Davos Trail: The Town's files on this property are corrupted and inaccessible so little is
known about the background on this property. The residence at 2701 Davos Trail was
constructed in 1981 and sits high on the lot, with significant vertical separation from Davos
Trail. In 1985, a separated garage was constructed at the street level, and in 1998 a funicular
was constructed connecting the garage to the residence. Based on the information available,
the funicular was treated as an accessory use to the residence and the Town's data
management system does not indicate that a conditional use permit was issued on this
property.
_440 .;
L
F ti
140 4111111L 104b
Funicular located at 2701 Davos Trail.
Page 5 of 15
97 Rockledge Road: The property at 97 Rockledge Road was redeveloped in the early
2000s. The funicular provides pedestrian access from Forest Road up to the residence on
Rockledge Road. The funicular was part of a major redevelopment of two homes, 86 Forest
Road and 97 Rockledge Road. The funicular was reviewed as an accessory use to the
residence.
Following a neighbor controversy when this funicular was constructed, the Vail Town Council
directed staff to amend the Zoning Code to require the issuance of a conditional use permit for
funiculars. On November 17, 2020, the Vail Town Council approved a text amendment to
Section 12-16-7 (A) 11, amending the Use Specific Criteria for Funiculars. The newly adopted
language has been included as part of this submittal.
Funicular located at 97 Rockledge Road.
Page 6 of 15
CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Section 12-16-6: CRITERIA AND FINDINGS, of the Vail Town Code provides the criteria
for review for a conditional use approval. These criteria, along with an analysis, are
provided below:
1. The relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the town.
Applicant Response: When the Vail Land Use Plan was adopted in 1986, and again when it
was updated in 2009, there has been an emphasis on creating a destination resort community
ambiance similar to what one would find in Europe. The Vail 20/20 plan recognizes the
Tyrolean character of the town, while at the same time acknowledges the "importance of
reinvention." The use of a funicular similar to those used in similarly steep environments in
Europe to help residents access their homes and portions of their property is a unique and
appropriate way of giving the residents of this property access to the ski slopes.
In reviewing the Vail Land Use Plan and the Vail 20/20 plan, this is an advancement that pays
homage to the Tyrolean style destination ski resort that Vail has become.
............................
Vail Land Use Plan
1.6. Development proposals on the hillsides should be evaluated on a case by case basis. :
Limited development may be permitted for some low intensity uses in areas that are not
highly visible from the Valley floor. New projects should be carefully controlled and developed
with sensitivity to the environment. 4.3. The ambiance of the Village is important to the
identity of Vail and should be preserved. (Scale, alpine character, small town feeling,
mountains, natural settings, intimate size, cosmopolitan feeling, environmental quality).
- 2. Land Use Pattern. The pattern of existing land uses in Vail has been shaped by the natural
characteristics of the Valley in concert with the man-made features that have been
constructed over the years. The predominant features of the Valley which have played a
major role in Vail's design include the proximity of steep slopes, the location of Gore Creek
and its floodplain, the location of the ski mountain and attendant ski facilities and the
presence of a major transportation corridor - Interstate 70 and its interchanges.
3. Development proposals on the hillsides may be appropriate, in a limited number of cases,
for low density residential uses. These proposals would need to be evaluated on a case -by -
Page 7 of 15
...................................................................................................................................
case basis, with development being carefully controlled as to sensitivity to the environment
and visibility from the Valley floor.
Vail 20/20
Sense of Place and Character: Vail values the strong history of the town and its unique
character and legacy while acknowledging the importance of reinvention. This is reflected in
the high quality of the built environment with design and features that endure over time.
20/20 Vision: The pedestrian ambiance and scale of Vail Village and LionsHead continues
into 2020, where the European alpine charm of Vail is replicated in its new development.
The unique character of Vail is evident from the Tyrolean building style that speaks of Vail's
history, to the mountain contemporary style that heralds technological advancement.
The proposed funicular has little impact on the development objectives of the Town but acts to
reflect the development objectives by allowing less impactful way of gaining access to
accessory structures or recreation structures/facilities versus that of a driveway or paved trail.
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
facilities, utilities, schools parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities
and public facilities needs.
Applicant Response: The proposed funicular is for private use only for a home in a two-family
residential district and will be used to transport residents of the home to their recreation facility.
Therefore, it will have no impact on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
facilities, utilities, schools parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public
facilities needs.
Page 8 of 15
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas.
Applicant Response: The proposed funicular is for private use only for a home in a two-family
residential district. Therefore, it will have no impact on traffic.
4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located,
including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses.
Applicant Response: There are two other homes in the vicinity that utilize solutions to move
people on the sleep terrain. One home also has a private funicular, while the other home has a
private gondola. The funicular offers the opportunity to move people from one place on the
steep property to another in a minimally intrusive yet safe way.
Gondola located at 330 Rockledge Road.
Funicular located at 97 Rockledge Road.
The exterior of the funicular will blend with the natural environment and has been designed to
be compatible with the site and the surrounding area. The proposed funicular is a 6 -person
cab that is customized to match the architecture and materials of the home. The total length of
track is 260 ft., and it will climb 105 ft. of elevation. The site is heavily treed, and the applicant
has made every effort to preserve the natural vegetation on the site, working closely with staff
and the Design Review Board. The track is proposed to be bronze, and varies in height
between 4 ft. to 7 ft. off the ground to allow for snow clearance. The cab is driven by an
Page 9 of 15
electric variable speed motor at the top, which
uses a cable and drum system, so noise is
minimal. The drum system is located within an
enclosure, as shown in the photo. The system
meets the setback requirement of 15 ft., and as
indicated on the specifications, without any
mitigating factors, the decibel level is 41 db at
15 ft., well within noise limitations of the Town of
Vail. The specification for the noise levels is
provided below:
HILL HIKER"
Cable and drum motor system which powers the
funicular.
HILL HIKER* INCLINED ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT NOISE SPECIFICATION
Hill Hiker@ Inclined Elevator systems are designed to operate at an ambient
noise level that is unobtrusive to the surrounding environment. That being said
the noise level of the system varies based on many factors such as the size and
type of drive system and the distance from the system.
Distance From Drive System
Noise Leel
2 in
80 db
2 f
59 db
5 ft
51 db
loft
45 db
15 ft
41 db
20 ft
39 db
25 ft
365 db
NOTE - Testing was completed using an Extech Instruments Sound Level Meter
model 407730 on a variety of different Hill Hiker drive system configurations
including differing foundation types and motor sizes. Testing occurred throughout
the entire travel length of each elevator with sound levels ranging from 47 to 80
decibels at a 2 inch testing distance from drive system.
NOTE - Max decibel readings witnessed occurred during the short startup period
when the elevator begins to move.
NOTE - Formula used to calculate noise level change related to distance:
Decibels of Change=20xIog(distance I/distance 2). Reference-
http,//www.mcsquared.ccm/dbframe.htm
Factors not measured that could further lessen the decibel level include but are
not limited to.
• Landscape plantings, vegetation or other environmental factors
• Motor Drive cover/housing
• Insulation of motor coverlhousing
• Power -pack mounted in a wall/floor motor area
The proposed funicular is designed
to be screened from view both from
above on the ski slope as well as
from below the residential dwelling.
There is significant existing
vegetation which screens the
funicular track and the DRB and
staff will review the landscape plan
to ensure proper screening of the
track. The applicant proposes to
make the track disappear from view
of any neighbors. Because the
funicular is located behind the
existing home, and due to dense
vegetation, it cannot be viewed from
the public street. The cab will be
parked at the bottom or top of the
track, directly adjacent to structure
and generally disappear from view.
Page 10 of 15
5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the
proposed use.
Applicant Response: Any additional questions by the Planning and Environmental Commission
can be addressed as necessary.
6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an
environmental impact report is required by chapter 12 of this title.
Applicant Response: No Environmental Impact Report is required for this application.
Page 11 of 15
CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: USE SPECIFIC CRITERIA AND
STANDARDS
Section 12-16-7(11): USE SPECIFIC CRITERIA AND STANDARDS, Funiculars and other
similar conveyances, of the Vail Town Code provides the criteria for review for a
conditional use approval. These criteria, along with an analysis, are provided below:
a. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when designed for
the purpose of providing pedestrian access to a residential dwelling, an accessory
structure, or recreation facility/structure, as determined by the planning and
environmental commission.
Applicant Response: The
funicular requested here is to
provide access between the
recreational facility (a portion of a
residential dwelling) near the ski
slope and the residential dwelling
at the bottom, and therefore
complies with this criterion. The
applicant explored other options
to access the facility, including
vehicular access (use by right),
paved trail for use by an all terrain
vehicle (use by right) or the use of
a ski lift or tow (conditional use
permit). It was determined that a
funicular would minimize site
disturbance as it can follow the
Drone shot of the construction occurring for the recreation facility of 696
Forest Road. The applicant has worked closely with Town staff and DRB to
project the existing vegetation.
natural slope and allows for a route that reduces the need for removal of trees. Low noise and
limited visibility were also important considerations. A private gondola, similar to the existing
gondola at 330 Rockledge Road, remains an option for the property depending on the
outcome of this application. This would still require a conditional use permit, but the review of a
gondola is not subject to these additional review criteria that a funicular is subject to.
Page 12 of 15
b. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when significant
site constraints prevent conventional means of vehicular access to the residential
dwelling, an accessory structure, or recreation facility/structure, as determined by
the planning and environmental commission. "Significant site constraints" shall be
defined as natural features such as mature trees, natural drainages, stream
courses, and other natural water features, rock outcroppings, wetlands, excessive
slopes, other natural features, and existing structures that may create practical
difficulties in the site planning and development of the lot.
Applicant Response: The property at 696 Forest Road is heavily forested with large aspen
trees, with slopes in excess of 40% in some locations. The elevation gain from the bottom of
the lot to the top is more than 300 feet and the proposed funicular climbs 105 feet in elevation.
These constitute significant site constraints that prevent accessing the recreation facility by
conventional means, and thus the proposed funicular complies with this criterion. A vehicular
access would need to traverse the site to allow for appropriate grade, which would then require
the elimination of a large number of trees and the need for extensive grading. The proposed
funicular is a more sensitive solution that reduces permanent scarring of the landscape.
In this instance, the funicular is being requested for the purpose of safely providing a means of
moving residents between the recreational facility near the ski slopes and the existing home. It
will be surrounded by trees and will have minimal visual impact to surrounding properties.
c. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when designed to
be compatible with both the site upon which they are located and the residential
dwelling to which they provide access, as determined by the planning and
environmental commission.
Applicant Response: The proposed
funicular is designed to be compatible
with the site and the surrounding area
as well as to be compatible with the
home. The proposed funicular is a 6 -
person cab that is custom bronze metal
and wood siding. The intent is that that
cab will match the architecture of the
home and will generally blend into the
Example of the funicular track proposed and how it can blend with
the site.
Page 13 of 15
environment. The track is also proposed to be bronze, and varies in height between 4 ft. to 7
ft. off the ground to allow for snow clearance. The total length of track is 240 ft., and it will
climb 105 ft. of elevation. The cab is driven by an electric variable speed motor at the top,
which uses a cable and drum system, so noise is minimal.
d. Funiculars and other similar conveyances shall only be allowed when designed to
be appropriately screened from view, as determined by the planning and
environmental commission.
Applicant Response: The proposed
funicular is designed to be screened
from view both from above on the ski
slope as well as from below the
residential dwelling. There is significant
existing vegetation which screens the
funicular track. Additional
landscaping may also be required by
the DRB. As a result, the funicular
will be screened from view and
complies with this criterion.
L—j
Existing vegetation and steep slopes at 696 Forest Road.
Page 14 of 15
ADJACENT PROPERTIES
MAURIELLO PLANNING GROUP
PO BOX 4777
EAGLE, CO 81631
LSC 27 LLC
4514 COLE AVE STE 1175
DALLAS, TX 75205-4183
670 FOREST RD LLC
6464 S QUEBEC ST STE 400
ENGLEWOOD, CO
80111-6730
OSTLING, PAUL J. & DAN ITA K.
1196 SMITH RIDGE RD.
NEW CANAAN, CT
06840-2332
RUMFORD, THEA J.
675 FOREST RD.
VAIL, CO 81657-5518
COLMAR LLC
MAHER
3465 N PINES WAY STE104 #71
WILSON, WY 83014-9129
MILLERS LIONSHEAD LLC,
JEFF FENTRISS
12770 MERIT DR., STE 300
DALLAS, TX 75251-1402
TREE LINE LLC,
BECKETT, TACKETT & JETEL, PLLC
7800 N. MOPAC EXPY, STE. 210
AUSTIN, TX 78759-8959
EPGT LLC, CORPORATION
—7
TRUST CENTER
1209 N. ORANGE ST.
WILMINGTON, DE 19801-1120
KAUFFMAN, JULIA IRENE
5955 MISSION DR
PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KS 66208-1206
VAIL HOLDINGS LLC
800 S DOUGLAS RD FL 12
CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-3125
THOMAS S. IRWIN AND
CECELIA J. IRWIN
REVOCABLE TRUST 2018
16 VITTORIA RDG
BOERNE, TX 78006-4702
HATHORN, MARY M. - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 706 FOREST ROAD B LLC
ENGLEMAN, JOHN W 6TH AVE & KIPLING ST PO BOX 2181
655 FOREST RD LAKEWOOD, CO 80225-0546 EDWARDS, CO 81632-2181
VAIL, CO 81657-5517
Page 15 of 15
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: November 23, 2020
ITEM/TOPIC:
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a Prescribed Regulation Amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7
Amendment, Vail Town Code to amend Section 12-23-6: Methods of Mitigation and Section 12-24-6: Methods of Mitigation, Vail
Town Code, to update the Payment of Fees in Lieu provisions of Commercial Linkage and Inclusionary Zoning, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0027)
The applicant has requested this item be tabled to December 14, 2020.
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: November 23, 2020
ITEM/TOPIC:
A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to establish a new Special Development District, (Alura Vail), pursuant to
Section 12-9-A Special Development (SDD) District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of 24 multifamily residential units
in eight (8) buildings with associated site improvements, located at 1472 Matterhorn Circle/Vail Park Meadows Subdivision, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0028)
The applicant has requested this item be tabled to December 14, 2020.
City of Vail, Colorado Logo
VAIL TOWN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE:
ITEM/TOPIC: October 26, 2020 PEC Results
ATTACHMENTS:
File Name Description
Pec results 102620.pdf October 26, 2020 PEC Results
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
TOWN Of VAIO October 26, 2020, 1:00 PM
Virtual
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
Call to Order
1. 1. Register in advance for this webinar:
https://us02web. zoom. us/webi nar/register/W N_Y9jQ4H5gQnGF C W w-
TbcG_g
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing
information about joining the webinar.
1.2. Attendance
Present: Ludwig Kurz, Karen Perez, Rollie Kjesbo, Brian Gillette, Henry
Pratt, Pete Seibert, John -Ryan Lockman
Absent: None
Main Agenda
2.1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to establish a new 60 min.
Special Development District, (Alura Vail), pursuant to Section 12-9-A
Special Development (SDD) District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the
development of 24 multifamily residential units in eight (8) buildings with
associated site improvements, located at 1472 Matterhorn Circle/Vail Park
Meadows Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-
0028)
Applicant: Alura Vail LLC, represented by The Brown Studio
Planner: Jonathan Spence
Commissioner Pratt: Recused himself due to working on a project
neighboring this property.
Planner Spence: Introduced this project as a preliminary review for the
former Park Meadows site. Today's item will mostly be for the applicant to
introduce this project and idea. Staff, including Fire and Public Works, has
conducted a preliminary review and shared comments with the applicant.
Spence then began to describe the scope of the project. There are three
deviations from the Town Code to be requested. These deviations are for
setbacks, parking count, and parking location.
Lina Shahhal with the Brown Studio: Introduced the other members of the
project at the meeting. She then began to describe the project scope. There
will be 8 buildings. Total required parking spaces are 40, but they are asking
for 36 for better landscaping and storage on site.
Commissioner Gillette: Asked where the setback variations are being
requested.
Spence: Specified that relief is being requested on the north, east, and west
side of the property. He also mentioned that this project had gone in front of
the DRB for a conceptual review in the previous week.
Commissioner Perez: Asked about the landscaping proposed.
The applicant and planner Spence showed and discussed the landscaping
using a presented map.
Franklin Boyer(applicant): went on to discuss the setback deviation request
as well. Surrounding neighbors have a large space between their
development and the applicant's lot lines.
Spence: Brought up a concern that Fire had about potential illegal parking
blocking the fire lane.
Gillette: Asked a question about possible neighbor concerns.
Franklin: Have not heard anything from any of their neighbors and didn't
expect to hear concern from them due to the distance from this development
to neighboring development.
Chairman Kurz: Asked how easy it would be to find the property lines should
PEC members want to visit the property in person.
Spence: Recommended that the PEC bring a map shown on screen as
there is not clear marking on site.
Commissioner Lockman: Asked about the parking count deviation. Asked if
the applicant will be managing the parking. Also asked about snow storage
Franklin: Yes. Parking will be managed. Also pointed out the proposed snow
storage area on a map.
Lena: Further explained that the parking provided will be for one space per
unit and some additional guest parking spaces. Also stated that this location
has close proximity to the bus system and bike path.
The applicants continued to explain the proposed design of the site using
shared materials and drawings.
Kurz: Asked if any additional red flags came to light as a result of staff
review.
Spence: Again mentioned the fire lane concerns.
Gillette: Asked if there were similar projects that this could be compared to.
Spence: Responded by saying generally, no. Each SDD is different in their
needs and deviations.
Seibert: Asked about the employee housing units.
Franklin: The project overall is aimed at employees in Vail, but in order to
make sure it work financially, not all units could be EHUs.
Seibert: Stated concern that seasonal rentals are more likely to create
parking issues.
Perez: Asked if they would prohibit short term rentals
Franklin: Said no, but said it was possible that they would limit how many
times individual units could be rented for this purpose.
Commissioner Kjesbo: Had a number of concerns. Concerned about the
reduction in parking for the long term. Concerned that the intended use may
change after some number of years. Most buildings around this property
has covered parking. Likely would not be in favor of an SDD currently.
Kurz: Asked a question about storage for outdoor gear.
Franklin: Indicated that there is storage for each unit. There is additional
storage space inside the units themselves as well.
Public Comment
Greg Baldwin: Owns a second home near the southeast side of the lot.
Concerned about looking down on the development and is interested in
seeing more tree screening. Would like to see a mountain feel maintained
and doesn't want the area to feel like a suburban subdivision.
Connie Kincaid-Strahan: Owns Vail Property Brokerage and represents an
owner to the south of this development. Wants to know the height of the
retaining wall on the property.
Robbie (applicant): The top of the wall shouldn't protrude much higher than
the grading itself. The wall will mostly be on the southeast end of the
property, this wall shouldn't protrude more than a few inches above the
grade on the south end.
Connie: Had a question about access to the rec path.
Robbie: This path is the city's land and the applicant has no intention of
messing with it. No path is proposed specifically to access this rec path.
Between the rec path and the project, trees are proposed for screening.
Connie: Asked about the total project height.
Lena: Project is currently at 29ft. The maximum allowed is 45 ft.
Robbie: Didn't want the project to have the feel of a condominium complex
by maximizing height.
Connie: Asked about when the applicant anticipates approval and the
construction timeline.
Franklin: Would like to be under construction by April if possible.
Mitch Karlin: Asked about an elevation drawing for the southeast corner.
Robbie: Currently does not have an elevation for the retaining wall on that
side.
Russ Craney: A representative for Coldstream. Had a question about the
previous Park Meadows height.
Franklin: That was around 26 ft. but would need to double check. This
project should be similar in scope. Stated that he would stay in contact with
Russ/Coldstream.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to table to November 23, 2020. Brian Gillette seconded
the motion and it passed (6-0).
Abstain: (1) Pratt
2.2. A request for review of an Exemption Plat, pursuant to Section 13-12, 10 min.
Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to establish utility and
driveway easements at Red Sandstone Elementary School, located at 545,
551, & 559 North Frontage Road/Block 2, a portion of Lot 8, Vail Potato
Patch Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC20-0029)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Erik Gates
Planner Gates introduced the project and the purpose of the application.
Erik provided a brief history of the site and referenced ERWSD as having
reviewed the plat.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (7-0).
2.3. A request for review of an exemption plat, pursuant to Title 13 Chapter 12, 30 min.
Exemption Plat, Vail Town Code, to allow for increases to the allowable Site
Coverage and Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) allotment for individual
lots within the Spraddle Creek Estates subdivision, and setting forth details
in regard thereto. (PEC20-0015)
Applicant: Spraddle Creek Estates Homeowners, represented by Zehren
and Associates
Planner: Jonathan Spence
Spence: This is largely the same proposal as the one seen by the PEC two
weeks ago. Spence then went on to describe the history of this proposal at
the PEC. Additional photos were included as part of this review session.
Zehren: As mentioned in other meetings, they would like to increase site
coverage to avoid maxing out building height all over.
Seibert: The idea of expanding building envelopes to keep building height
down makes sense.
Zehren: To clarify, they are not proposing to increase building envelops, just
to be able to use more coverage within them.
Spence: Doesn't feel that the relatively modest request will have a significant
impact on the visibility of these homes.
Gillette: We have not done a comparison to Forest Road site coverage here
have we?
Spence: Due to the shape of developments on Forest Road, this would not
be applicable or useful.
Gillette: Concerned that because of the way the code is written that
additional GRFA at Spraddle would all be above ground and create a larger
apparent bulk and mass. Whereas, at Forest Road additional floor area
often has to be placed underground.
Spence: Generally doesn't see this as an issue as Forest Road homes are
allowed a similar proportion of bulk and mass.
Kurz: Any additional changes still go to DRB?
Zehren: That is correct.
Gillette: Still concerned about additions making use of additional site
coverage and creating very long building frontages.
Zehren: Willing to look into making increases in site coverage proportionally
smaller.
Gillette: Asked for either a mock-up of the worst-case scenario of build out
or an analysis of Forest Road site coverage and GRFA in comparison to
this request.
Pratt: It appears that Spraddle is proposing a smaller proportion of site
coverage to GRFA than Forest Road.
Spence: That is correct but feels that comparing Forest Road to Spraddle
Creek in this way is not comparing apples to apples.
Gillette: The way Spraddle was platted originally was to avoid huge, highly
visible houses. Concerned that this proposal may lose that intent.
Zehren: Showed some example lots and building envelopes to show that
many lots are limited in how much longer they can grow. Most lots have
homes that reach from end to end of their building envelopes currently.
Gillette: Felt much better about the proposal after seeing these examples.
Lockman: Generally ok with it based off of staff's analysis.
Pratt: Feels that modeling out potential buildouts isn't helpful as different
architects will have different designs and solutions to lot restrictions. Feels
that seeing existing buildings and their envelopes is more helpful here.
No public comment.
Perez: Stated that her comments from the last meeting had not been
addressed in this application.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (6-1).
Ayes: (6) Gillette, Kjesbo, Kurz, Lockman, Pratt, Seibert
Nays: (1) Perez
3. Approval of Minutes
3.1. October 12, 2020 PEC Results
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (7-0).
4. Adjournment
Rollie Kjesbo moved to adjourn. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (7-0).
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the
Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project
orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.
Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the
Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information.
Please call 711 for sign language interpretation 48 hour prior to meeting time.
Community Development Department
Ad #: 0000638245-01
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM DEVLM
Your account number is: 1023233
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
VAIL DAILY
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
I, Mark Wurzer, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of
the VAIL DAILY, that the same daily newspaper printed, in
whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle,
State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein;
that said newspaper has been published continuously and
uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the
first publication of the annexed legal notice or
advertisement and that said newspaper has published the
requested legal notice and advertisement as requested.
The VAIL DAILY is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only forjurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every number
of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and
that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of
said newspaper dated 11/20/2020 and that the last
publication of said notice was dated 11/20/2020 in the
issue of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
12/4/2020.
Mark Wurzer. Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and
for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day
12/4/2020.
Jeri Medina, Notary Public
My Commission Expires: August 19, 2024
DFJU YFDINA
NOTARY Nal1C
A OF COLORADO
NYusrtA m3+
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
November 23, 202 D, 1:01) PM Virtual
]5 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colored., 81657
1. Call to Order
1.1. Attendance
1.2. Registerin advance for this webinar:
imam us02web.zoom.us/webiner/regisWMN_OrWQimXPONMh lMdNSXEg
After registering, Y...Ill receive. confi—b- email containing information
about taming the ..loin.,.
2. Main Agenda 2.1.
A request for the review of a Conditional Use Permit, ppuus nt to Easton
12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, t. .lbwFuniculars and other
imilar conveyances, a Conditional Use in the Two-Familyco
Primary/Secondary(PS)
(PS) Distinct, located at 696 Forest RoadA-.t S. Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6,
and satbng fodh details In regain thereto. IPE320-0124)21) mm.
Applicant LSC 27 LLC, represented by au,i,ll, Planning Group
Planner: Jonathan Spence
2.2. Arequeslfor a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a Prescribed
Regulation Amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Veil Town
Codeto amend Section 12-23-6: Methods of Mitigation and Section 12-24 6:
Methods.' Mitigation, Vail T.wn Code, m update the Payment of Fees in Lieu
provisions of Commercial Linkage and Inclusbnary Zoning, and setting forth
details In regard thereto. (PEC20-002]) 2 min.
The applicant has requested this item be tabled W December 14,2D20.
Applicant-. Tawn of Vail, represented by George Ruth,
2.3. Arequestforarecommendeliontothe Vail Town Coundltoeatablishanew
Special Developp t Distract, (Alu ra Vail pursuantto Section 12-9-A Spedel
Develepment(Sooj Distract, Vail Town de to allow for thedevelopmem of
24 molNamiyresld-W units in eight (8) building. with aas.dated site
improvements, located at 1472 Malterhom CircleNail Park Meadows
SubdMslon, and selling forth detalls In regard thereto. (PEC20- 0028) 2 min.
The applicant has requested this item be tabled to December 14, 2020.
Applicant: Alone
�Vit -I-C, epresented by The Brown Studio
Jonathan
3. Approval of Minutes
3.1. October 26, 2020 PEC Results
4. Adioamment
Theapplications and information abouttheproposals are available for public inspection during gularol-
fice hours at the Town of Vail Communiry Development DeparVnent, ]5 South Frontage Roan. The W blis
is nvited W attend the Ixoled orientation and the site mils that Recede the public hearing in Ne Town of
Vail Community Development Depamment. Times and order of Items are approximate, subject to change,
and cannot be relied upon 10 determine atwhMt the Planning and Envirenmenlai Commission will con-
sideran item. Please call (870) 4792138 for additional information. Please -11711 for sign language inter-
pretation 48 hour pnor W meeting time.
Community Development Dan ment Published In the Vail Daily November 20, 2D20. 00/0638245
Ad #: 0000634953-01
Customer: TOWN OF VAIL/PLAN DEPT/COMM DEVLM
Your account number is: 1023233
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
VAIL DAILY
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
I, Mark Wurzer, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of
the VAIL DAILY, that the same daily newspaper printed, in
whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle,
State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein,
that said newspaper has been published continuously and
uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of
more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the
first publication of the annexed legal notice or
advertisement and that said newspaper has published the
requested legal notice and advertisement as requested.
The VAIL DAILY is an accepted legal advertising medium,
only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home
Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every number
of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and
that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of
said newspaper dated 11/6/2020 and that the last
publication of said notice was dated 11 /6/2020 in the issue
of said newspaper.
In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this day,
12/16/2020.
Mark Wurzer. Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and
for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado this day
12/16/2020.
Jeri Medina, Notary Public
My Commission Expires: August 19, 2024
ea MPnita
HOTARr aueuc
STAIE OF COLORA00
AIeM BXY
WWSTIA AN
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Me Planning aM
Envirom
nental Commisslon of the Town of lot will
hold a Public hearing in Man- ithsectionl2-
3-8, Vail Town Code, on November 23, 2020 at
100 pm In the Town of Veli Munldipal Building.
hues l%us02web zcoomrus/webinlar%re isterhVN Or
mXP r 1 0
After registyou ering, will re Ceconfirmation
mail wntaining iniormationabout joining the
webinar.
A request for the reNew of a Conditional Use Per-
mit, Pursuant to Section 12-16, Conditional flee Per-
mits, Vail Town Code, to allow Funiculars and other
similar convayences, a Condltlonal Usa In the Two-
-Family Pn-Zry Secondary (PS) District, located
at 696 Forest Ro.d4-. 8, Block 1, Vail Vllage FlI-
g 6, and sarong font, details in regard thereto.
(PEC20-0024)
Applicant LSC 27 LLC, represented by Mandell,
Planning Group
Plan�rer: Jonathan Spence
The apdicanons end Intormaron about the proPos-
Is are available for public inspection dunng office
hours at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public
Is Invited to Mandl site Adds. Please call 970-479-
2138 m vIsIten—, Iuo—roJ2 ann nafor addition-
al information.
Sign language Interpretation avallable upon
request with 24-hour notification, dial 711.
Published November 6, 2020 in the Vail Daily.
0000634953