HomeMy WebLinkAboutGore Creek Promenade - International Bridge Improvements*t^-,X- r r A
-B(k5-8,t)O'\CbDesign Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Cobrado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 faxt 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
DRB Number: DRB030180
Location:
Project Name: TOV / Scalpello flags in Village
Project Description:
Project Address: 413 GORE CREEK DR VAIL
Bridge St. Gore Creek Dr. Promenade & LH
legal Description: Lot: Block 5-E Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1
Parcel Number: 210108204004
Comments: Staff approval based on DRB's reqmnts
125 Country flags to place on wall brackets around TOV for the summer.
Particapants:
OWNER TOWN OF VAIL 05/28/2003 Phone:
C/O FINANCE DEPT
75 S FRONTAGE RD
VAIL co 816s7 n. x_<_CV'-Licenser (/\ u" - 4
APPLICANT RickScalpello&Larry Parde05l28l2O03 Phone: 47}-L7LL - I n,KyVtrozd'p-PoB160 (\/*.- ,,,,: \\Vail,CO J^,/|-VV'--
Scalpello@attglobal.net 81658 | dK'>" - -yLLicense: - W <(e't'
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
MoUon By: Action: SIAFFAPR
Second By:Vote: DateofApproval:0612512403
Conditions:
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid: $0.00
,.,*tD
Application for Design Review
General Inlormation:
All projects requiring design review must receive approvirl prior to $ubmitting a building permit application Please
refer to the submittal rcqurrements for the par|cular approval that is requested. An application for Design fieview
cannot be accepted untit att reluired Information is recciverl by the Oommunity Development Department The
projecl may also need to ne re,uieweA by the Iown Corrrrc;il, anil/or the Planning and Environnpntal C'omrnission
Design review approval rup""" uni"*l a building pefmlt i$ issued and construction commencos wilhin
one year of the aPProval.
Depa rnenl of Oomrnunity llevolopment
75 South Frorttage Road' Vail, Colorado 81657
lel. g'10.4/g.2139 lax 97 O.479'2452
web: www.ci vail.('( .uri
oescription of the Requeslt tNJLIX]_-WRIOA5. .(:l2qJTK"l-t,LAhi'..r.u-ttunlrc}t)-
tru*.Utitnee I -uottsa,eap'_91 .O/aaloe. r*tt\G *aALL-elLt-&e*t1i,sJAt*'c'b'al7eE€ 'Luk|"l
eeeiiiirlu -i:rr wev :sRr\^D-eD a"-,u-!-c'DNG aMeR/IlAPA€€{l -' -'-' "-'
lllle4€. t"ttktfiep
Location of the ProPosal: l-ot:
Physical Address:
parcet No.:210 l06aB-(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcol no )
,qDtr'rAS
?6D. aaJ€,
Zoning r
Name(s) of owner(s): U4-P]?Q-5- ,
Mailing Address:
Name of Appficant: RLCK-K%L-9-€LL..2. fr
^ i,ou- tb? vAtL c0 glbgMailing Address: .y!2, .i3!/8.-...;.?-v.. .' tul'.
innnu,-1ltz:-Yfi-:.I7t l- ..
ile uov6l; rlto'-we- 13so --' -
g
E-mail ArJdress: --S4flLGl-LOe fl
Type of Review and Fee:
' Sigrrs
' Conceptual Rcview
. New Conslru0lion
' Addition
. Minor Alteralion
(mulli-lamilY/commorcial)
. Minof Altet€tion
(sin gle-tamily/duplex)
' Changes lo Approved Plans
. Separation Requ€st
$50 Plus $1.00 per squat€ focl of total sign area'
No Fee
$650 f-or construction oi a new building or demo/rebuih'
$300 [:or an arldition wn€re squa's footage Is added.lo any residential or
cornrnercial building (inrJudes 25O additions & interior Oonversiolls)'
$250 For mirto[ ohangBs lo buildings and site improvefnel. s' such as'
reroo{ing, painting' window adclitions' landscaping' fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For nrintr changes lo buildings and site improvements' such as'
reroofing, painting, windo;v additions, landscaping' fonces and
rctaining walls' elc-
$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Slaff or the
Desigr) Roview Boarcl
No P:ee
IVED
i 2003
For Office U$e (
Fee Pairf : It\hll)
,,*ffi
APj.fgyED BY rHE
Desir :1r",[,}?boro
DATE.
SIGN APPLIcaTRDTNNE
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
General Information
This application is for any sign that is located within the Town of Vail. Specific requirements are available
from the Department of Community Development.
I. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Name of Business:
B. Building name and physical address;
C. Written approval from condominium association, landlord, and joint owner, if applicable.
D. Type of sign (check all that apply):
!Freestanding Sign
!WallSign
DHanging / Projecting Sign
DDisplay Box
trDaily Special Board
trJoint Directory Sign
l-] Subdivision Entrance Sign
U Building Identification
D Mural! Window Sign
tr Sign Program
tr Gas Filled/Fiber Optic
tr Temporary Sign
E Other
Number of signs proposed:/z Number of signs existing:-
Sign message:
Sign and lettering dimensions for each proposed sign (attach a colored scaled schematic
drawing@1/+"=I'):
Length of business frontage:
Height of sign(s) from grade:
Sign Location (attach a site plan and an elevation drawing or a photograph clearly
indicating the proposed location of sign(s)):
Materials and colors of sign (atbach samples):
Sign lighting plan:
o Indicate type, location and number of fixtures.o Include height above grade, lumens output, luminous area.o Atbach a cut sheet for each proposed fixture.
Drawings showing how and where the sign or awning will attach to the building and how
the awning will be constructed.
5E.
F.
Lr.
H.
I.
'l
K,
L.
M.
L/-/rt9/ra fl4a0Ec /p P4/40
Page 3 of 4/0lll0/02 &/fr eru//L,/,M-^*.ft- l**t,,,-+ E/,
The Administrator and/or DRB may require the submission of additional plans, drawings,
speciflcationsf samples and other materials (including a model) if deemed necessary to
determine whether a project will comply with Design Guidelines or if the intent of the
proposal is not clearly indicated.
NOTESTO ALLAPPUCANTS
Time Reouirements
The Design Review Board meets on the lst and 3rd Wednesdays of each month. A complete application
form and all accompanying material must be accepted by the Community Development Department prior
to application deadlines. A schedule of DRB meetings and associated application deadlines may be found
on the World Wide Web at htto://ci.vail,co.us/commdev/olanning/drb/meetinos/default.htm
Review Criteria
The proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Design Guidelines as set forth in T'itle 12 (Zoning
Regulations) and Title 14 (Development Standards) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code,
Desion Review Board Meetino Reouirements
For new construction and additions, the applicant must stake and tape the project site to indicate
property lines, proposed buildings and building corners. All trees to be removed must be taped. The
applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter is not buried by snow. All site tapings and
staking must be completed prior to the day of the DRB meeting.
The applicant, or their representative, shall be present at the Design Review Board Hearing. Applicants
who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting date and who have not
asked in advance that discussion on their item be postponed, will have their items removed from the DRB
agenda until such time as the item has been republished.
If the DRB approves the application with conditions or modifications, all conditions of approval must be
resolved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Staff Approval
The Administrator (a member of the planning staff) may review and approve Design Review applications,
approve with certain modifications, deny the application, or refer the application to the Design Review
Board for a decision. All staff approvals are reviewed by the Design Review Board and any staff decision
is subject to final approval by the DRB.
N.
Page 4 of 4/01/10/02
May28,2003
To Whom It May Concem:
The Town ofVail has purchased over one hundred colorful country flags to display throughout the
downtown business districts from mid June to late September. These flags will add color, motion
and ambiance to our streetscapes.
We are asking property owners, condominium associations and/or property manager to allow the
town to fly one or more 3' by 5' country flags that will be affrxed to the exterior of your building.
The Town of Vail will take responsibility for affixing the brackets for the poles, installing the flags
at the beginning of each summer and removing them at the end of each summer. Because the flags
will add to the festive ambiance of the villages for our Independence Day celebrations, we would
like to install them by the end of June.
Please fax your agreement to participate to Lary Pardee (479-2166) at your earliest convenience,
but not later than June 16. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call
Larry Pardee (479-2165) or Rick Scalpello (479-l7ll).
Sincerely,
Town of Vail
Larry Pardee
Public Works
AGREED TO:
PROPERTY NAME/ADDRES S :
NAME & TITLE:
APPROVED BY THE
'#tgHEffibo'o
SIGNATLIRE:
DATE:
FIL T COPY
DES]GN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
Wednesday, June 18, 2003
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS
PUBLIC WELCOME
PROJECT ORIENTATION, LUNGH - Gommunity Development Department
EI Sign Code Design Guidelines - Please bring your commentsE GRFA Discussion
MEMBERS PRESENT
Bill Pierce
Hans Woldrich
Margaret Rogers
David Viele
SITE VISITS
MEMBERS ABSENT
Clark Brittain
12:00 pm
2:00 pm1. Wren House - 5024 Main Gore Drive2. Deighan residence - 1163 Cabin Circle3. Vail das Schone - 2111 N. Frontage Rd.4. Roost Lodge- 1783 N. Frontage Road5. VailVillage Inn - 100 E. Meadow Drive6. Bogart's Bar & Bistro - 143 E. Meadow Drive7. Bridge Street
Driver:Allison
PUBLIC HEARING - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. VailVillage Inn DRB03-0190
Final review of proposed repaint
100 E. Meadow Drive, Lot 0, Block 5D
Applicant: Village lnn Plaza Phase V Condo Assoc.
MOTION: Margaret Rogers SECOND: David Viele VOTE:
TABLED UNTIL JULY 2,2003
2. Bogart's Bar & Bistro DRB03-0194
Final review of proposed signs
143 E. Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 50, VailVillage l"tFiling
Applicant: Dalu Enterprises, Inc.
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: David Viele
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That a new awning must replace the existing awning.
3:00 pm
MaWBill
3-0 (Hans recused)
Bill
VOTE:4-0
3. Roost Lodge DRB03-0184
Final review of proposed deck alteration
1783 N. Frontage Rd./Lots 9-12, Buffehr Creek SubdivisionApplicant: Lester Narpecha
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: David Viele VOTE: 4-0
Allison
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That the entire railing must be completed as is already started.
4. The Wren House DRB03-0185 Allison
Final review of proposed re.paint and replacement of windows
The Wren House, 5024 Main Gore Drive/Block 3, Gore Creek Subdivision
Applicant The Wren House Condo Association
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: David Viele VOTE: 4-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITIONT
1. The applicant will replace the proposed dark green trim with a gray color similar to
the gray on the Christiania which must be submitted to staff for review and
approval, prior to submitting for a building permit.
5. Deighan residence DRB03-0193 Allison
Conceptual review of proposed addition and exterior modifications
1 163 Cabin Circle/Lot 1 , Block 2, Vail Valley 1'r FilingApplicant Kevin Deighan, represented by Gwathmey Praft SchulE Architeets
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
6. Brandt residence DRB03-0181 Warren
Final review of proposed single-family with EHU
1722Bulfehr Creek Road/Lot 5, Eleni Zneimer SubdivisionApplicant Scoft & Claudine Brandt, represented by Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects
MOTION: Margaret Rogers SECOND: David Viele VOTE:4-0
APPROVED WITH 6 CONDITIONS:
1. The applicant shall make revisions to the plans which show combination retaining
walls with a minimum four foot separation between walls as required by Town Code.
2. The applicant shall submit engineer stamped drawings for all retaining walls over
four feet in height with the building permit application.
3. The applicant shall obtain proper approval to locate landscaping improvements in
the designated utility easement at the time of building permit submittal.
4. The applicant shall file the appropriate paper work to establish a deed restricted
EHU on the property when submitting for a building permit.
5. The applicant or a representative shall file a revised plat which depicts the revised
platted building envelope which must be reviewed by staff and recorded prior to the
issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy.6. That the amended building envelope is approved for this design only and will revert
back to the previous 60X90 platted envelope in the event this project is not
constructed or there is a design change.
7. Vail Das Schone Building DRB03-0211 Warren
Final review of a proposed re-roof
2111 North Frontage Road WesWail Das Schone Filing 3
Applicant: Vail Das Schone Condo Association, represented by Scott Wirth of Wirth
Management, Inc.
MOTION: David Viele SECOND: Margaret Rogers VOTE:4-O
APPROVED WITH 3 GONDITIONS:
1. That the cold roof be redesigned to match the design found in the Zoning Code
Interpretations Handbook with a ridge vent height of 12 inches or less as
measured in the drawing.
2. The applicant shall use the "weathered wood" Cetainteed Presidential Shake AR.
3. The applicant shall submit a complete Design Review Board application for
replacing the existing damaged awning no later than July 21, 2003 in order to be
heard on the August 6, 2003 Design Review Board Meeting
8. Sonnenalp Hotel/Swiss Chalet DRB02-0279 Warren
Final review of proposed major exterior alteration
20 Vail Road, 62 E. Meadow Drive, and 82 E. Meadow Drive/Lots K & L, Block 5E, Vail
Village 1"'FilingApplicant Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Margaret Rogers VOTE: 4-0
APPROVED WITH 6 CONDITIONS AND 1 SUGGESTION:
1. The applicant shall submit a Design Review Board application for review and
approval of a comprehensive sign program prior to issuance of a Temporary
Certifi cate of Occupancy.
2. That there be no roof top mechanical equipment permitted and all roof
penetrations be painted to match roofing material prior to approval of a Certificate
of Occupancy.
3. The applicant shall address the relevant comments from Public Works in the
document dated June 10, 2003 prior to submitting for a building permit.
4. The applicant shall submit civil drawings for review and approval by the Public
Works Department which must address all engineering issues and concerns prior
to submitting for a building permit.
5. The applicant will erect larger material mockups on site for review and final
approval by the Design Review Board of the colors and materials to be used on
the Swiss Chalet prior to beginning their application.
6. The applicant will submit plans to the Design Review Board for review and
approval if in the design of mechanical systems vents are proposed on any
elevation within view of the public.
7. lt is suggested that the wall of the fourth floor room located in the tower on the
comer of the building follow the outline of the octagonal tower.
9. Town of Vail DRB03-0180 Warren
Final review of proposed flags
Bridge St., Gore Creek Drive & Promenade, Meadow Drive & Lionshead Pedestrian area
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Rick Scalpello
MOTION: David Viele SECOND: Margaret Rogers VOTE:4-0
TABLED UNTIL JULY 2,2OO3
Staff Aoprovals
Atwell residence DRB03-0192 Elisabeth
Ghanges to approved plans
1390 Buffehr Creek Rd./Lot G-2. Residences at Briar Patch CondosApplicant WebsterAtwellll
Priebe/Gisondi DRB03-0207 Elisabeth
Deck extension and new stairs
2600 Kinnickinnick Road/Meadow Creek SubdivisionApplicant Erick Priebe
Hill residence DRB03-0189 Warren
Replace entry walk, stairs and planter box
4889 Meadow Drive/Lot 14, Bighorn 5'Addition
Applicant: Joan S. Hill
Mill Creek Condo DRB03-0179 Elisabeth
Re-roof
302 Hanson Ranch Road/Block 5A, Vail Village 5'n Filing
Applicant: Mill Creek Court Condo Association
Rogers residence DRB03-0188 Elisabeth
Re-roof
4802 Meadow Lane/Lot 6, Block 7, Bighorn sth AdditionApplicant David S. Rogers
Baker residence DRB03-0208 Warren
Deck addition
4126 Columbine Drive/Lot 16, Bighorn Subdivision
Applicant: Judy & Bruce Baker
Eckelberger residence DRB03-0204 Allison
Porch extension
Booth Falls Townhomes, 3094 Booth Falls CourULot 1, Block 2, VailVillage 12h Filing
Applicant: Judie Eckelberger
De lraola residence DR8030209
Deck addition
Warren
Vail Point, 1881 Lionsridge Loop, #33/Lot 1, Block 3, Lions Ridge 3d Filing
Applicant: lgnacio & Sara De lraola
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planne/s office, located at the Town of Vail Community
Devefopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call479-
2356,Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
75 south trontage road
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 479-2100
offlce ol mryor
June 18, 1990
Mr. Chuck Ogilby
Mr. Don C. Byers
2938 South Frontage Road lJest
Vail, Co'l orado 81657
Dear Chuck and Oon:
Thank you for your letter and your discussion concerning your ideas for
the Town of Vail taking over regulation of Gore Creek to promote
flyfishing and enhancement of fish habitat.
I have turned the letter over to Ron Phil'l ips and expect the staff to be
analyzing your suggestions and providing funther information for the
Council. I expect that Ron or another nember of the Town staff will be
in touch with you to discuss this further in the near future.
S i ncerel y,
R. Rose
KRR/bsc
cc: Ron Phjll ips
en
March 16, 1990
Mr. Kent Rose, Mayor
Town of Vaii
City Hall
Vail, Colorado 8'1657
Dear Mayo Rose,
Per our recent conversation, we feel that the town should consider a proposal to
improve the quality of flyfishing in Gore Creek. We have done our homawork (by
fishing the stream for many days over many years) and we would like the city council
consider assisting us.
We know the following;
1. First and loremost, Gore Creek has the necessary insects and the quantity of insecis
to support a substantial tout population.
2. The steam needs very few impovements. meaning that very little money needs to
be spent.
3. Continuing to allow fish to be caught and killed in Gore Creek continues to decreasa
the numbers ol trout and the average size because the fish in their pime are being
taken before they can reproduce,
4. Proper regulations and policing of thoss regulations would enhance the quality of
the fishing experience and would hing fly fishermen to Vail during the monihs of July,
August. September, and October.
Assuming for now that the above facts are conect, we think a plan aiong the foilowing
lines would be workable and very successlul.
Appoach the State ol Colorado Department of Wildlife and ask them to let the Town ol
Vaii take over regulation of Gore Creek from the town boundary in East Vail to the
confluence of Gore Creek and the Eagle Biver at Dowd Junction. The town would then
designate this portion of the creek 'tlyfishing only with barbless hooks and all lish
caught must be immediately returned to the steam." Then the town would sell annual
permits to fish the creek for $10.00. When a person buys a permit he signs a
statement ihat he agrees to abide by the regulations and would agree to a substantial
fine for any violation. The money received from the sale of permits would be used to
hire two people to police the stream during the months of June, July, August,
September, and October to make sure fishermen are abiding by the rules.
For lhose people who want to take fish home to eat and lcr the kiCs, one of the ponds
by the golf course could be stocked annually with fout and people would be allowed
to keep those lish.
We really feel that the Town of Vail has a tremendous asset in Gore Creek anC with a
./..
little " tender loving care " we could make this into one more reason people lova to
come to Vail. Many local businessmen we have talked with about the plan think it
would be a great way to help business in the fall of the year.
We are available to dscuss this matter with you at any time. Thank you for inviting this
letter.
{etr -
CorrJaY- -roill
Cttrcse TC $'a,te
Pcso
c
LrrqNo - €ee Lrce'tce
1ve Fa<t Se"<tce
tJes rlr lQt-orl5ro>Q
FaRL'<g'*-
Cner-(*atzr'7
Chuck Ogilby /
47&3070
(
75 soulh frontage road
Yall, colorado 81657
(303) 479'2138
(303) 4792139
June l-5, L989
otfice of community development
Mr. Bob FritchSitzmark Lodge
183 East Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Re: Credit for fnprovements to Gore Creek Prornenade
Dear Bob,
Stan Berryman, Director of Public Works, has reviewed your costsincurred for improvements for the Gore Creek Promenade on the northside of the Sitzrnark Lodge. Stan stated that ttas far as we candiscern, these costs seen reasonable. I As you know, when the
Planning Conmission approved your request for an exterior alteration
and density control variance on March 9, 1987 ' Condition No. 6stated:
ttTtre applicant wiII agree to participate in and not rernonstrateagainst a Vail Village irnprovement district if and when one isforrned. Credit will be given to the applicant in an equitable
manner (deternined by the Town council via an improvenentdistrict process) for the cost of improvements off of the
applicant's property if an overall. Vail village improvement
district is formed.tt
In accordance with this condition of approval, the planning staff andPublic Works department acknowledge that you have spent $50,968.56 on
improvements located on public ProPerty. The staff will place theinfornation that you have subrnitted for your construction costs inthe perrnanent file for the Sitznark property. If and when the
special improvement district is formed for the Village area, this
information will be readily available in the Sitznark file.
If you have any further guestions about the cost crediting, pLease
feel free to contact me. As per the condition of approval, it will
be up to the Council to deterrnine exactly the anount of credit you
will receive for your inprovements. In the future, if staff,Council, or you would like to review the discussion of your credit, Isuggest listening to the Council Worksession tape #2 of March 1.0,1987.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
r) l fi,\
nniz\fl kr'f+Kristan Prit2Senior Planner
KP: lr
cc: Peter Patten
Ron Phillips
75 south lronlsge road
Yall, colorsdo 81657
(303) 47$'2138
(303) 47$'2139
olllce ot communlly develoPmenl
october 25, 1989
Mr. Ned Gwathney
Gwathney Arnold Architects
L000 South Frontage RoadVail, Colorado 81657
Re: Gore Creek Promenade ConstructLon
Dear Ned:
Yesterday Joe Norris and I met with Eric Johnston and Curt Brosig
on the site of the drainage and paver work adjacent to the Gore
Creek Building. A pipe of 6rr was already in place. Eric agreed
that the contractor would build a connection from the down spout
on the Gore Creek Plaza Building to a catch basin connected to the
6" pipe. Heat tape wiII be placed from the down spout through the
pipe.
Bob Fritch of the Sitznark carne to the site, and explained that the
connection between the Sitzmark and the Gore Creek Plaza belonged
to the sitzrnark. He stated that he would have a connection nadewith heat tape from the down spout on this building to the catch
basin being placed by the contractor for the Gore creek Plazabuilding.
The Town of Vait will continue the pipe to the creek. If you have
any questions or concerns, please call me.
SincereLy,
"* "6r/rJPlanning Technician
cc: Bob Fritch
$
il
_{sr!
€
d+
Trli
H$
ilt
El r
{l i
$i{
ol0-
I
nld
$t$
$.
P
I:t- .FIsl'o
3
!
$
$t;
C\
:t0-
I
v4t-
$t*,\\J
:({t
El
8l.l
0-l
rl\)l
ul0lol
-,-r'
F
b
$$
s,il
h
UL.tl
rJ
$nro
s-t-$
{\
$tt^
8_L
J
i
$.FIx
s8
i
i
E
$
Lq,n
T
,ottnn
c9
L
t'
g
5A-
-$as
':I
T
_[
+tf
3
$
4(.-6t
N\$. \)tN ,(\:-
N\.{t'gs\$G-
NRi
." o\$tN
\S- {
\$L=L
J-{-issrQ,\a-Ffit'
G\2
{\
1*J
.S
n.r{t;.6h
=\St{'5
:i;t;
\
S"-
\
g.
Nb,,
\{t,
$F$
\,\,
\\
\\\'
N\
lrt
J-5-sS*Q:.s-{.tr
rtisu'i,
t\
\
Et_
1q.qr
UT
*,7I
flL
q
\i
N\Pv-
h
x
th-5
s
.T8
t
;
t.i.
5i
g
f
Jt\5\,{
It
{
T
4,
s
3
€
Rs
to)
V
'l*
x
$
U
J$
{I
ri
{R
.,S -t
$*
$
$
s
ss-
.L
*
t
*
$
d$
*
PAGE " (11 | 52
oo
gr
=\\
@\\2\.I+
{ --\itS
-( .r.{\qL
Q -r.qJ{
{,,5I
ST
5. lJ,x
{
\
E\"_
ta51 1l -10-8861, ii . .lcvd
h\t
s+Tt$
st
s
\
Ts
Et
rttr --F$t
tI
tx..t- \LfrFIt If&
.\
5rf
*
{
FF
F
T.F
F+
c-*
FF'l\:S\rl
r\+
$
&
$t
+
I
,l'
-t,
-[
.L3s'l
prlJfn\uf
;l
Ei
E.\
\
I
-.*.t
L'--+
H$F
$
lFr
ll
$
F}
t
s'
T
{
Fnut.
Nt
q.
\
l
I
xv
::1:,.{
::st
$(\
FTEtT,t
$
$
ii
J
rn 't
t4 *-
cj
!;
..b
r
I
{I
t:.Hrj
Itu?trif
rl;
h'rfl,
tl*'i
?i$
I
.sltlt'i.I'r;. I
J
.Jt\
TL;
ts
TJ
I.Jt--
,utrl
tl]fil
\.!
lrl
ntr\-
at I
H
*
ss-
g
r
s
l\s-
B-
h
x
tk-5-$'s
$H
'{t
N
{i1l
/$il
I*y'{{,L
$R$
' :,tj
{{
J$'
'\t
$
o
L
..n
q
={Gr l$lFL--+l
,N$
TJ
l$
llrt
r$
*I
rI\
$t
11:521983-07-20
?*, G{ - Pn,-.--a-(-
T0l,i\
DEPART}IENTI
PROJECT TITLE:
fn.
OF VA IL . PROFOSED CAP ITAL If'IPROVTIIENI PROJEC r
D IVIS ION
STARTING DATE:6rce crw Ppomqusg5
GOIIPLETION DATE:
ff qr€,tL, ${lnA, d.,loanslroti Ql*hT of 60€ $eoLffi-- ,lo4& rr^?rafirui"3J witl caru,gQt+q
FIND /I A}ID TITLE:
PL4"NN ING /DES IGN
LAND ACQUISITION
SITE, LANDSCAPING.6. STREETDEVELOP}IENTS & IUPROVEI.IENTS
BUILDINC, STRUCTURE & PLANTpEvELopr'lENTs & rlrpRovelgxri
PROJECT FUNDINC
FUTURE OPERATING COSTS ree2 iT0TAL PRIORITY
RAT1NGS A}tOi,IG
DEPAITT}IENT
PROJECTS ONLY
PROJECTS
NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE
ALL PERSONNEL COSTS
OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLI
qAPITAL OUTLAY
FUTURE REVENUE FRO},I PROJECT
*T-l5ilffilFffi#Lryt
u'
mo .lusrrFrEFTdli
D,\TE:!UB.YITTED
-_-}ndtaaiaa 1I0Oru
-ii-
,I
lt
ti
I
lrit
o
fr* i #&A ?a/a-
.Its( rfu -
d'1 C(. ^kb >r&z-
v
Project Application
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot B lock Filing Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
Summary:
{,",fth
Date:
E statt Approval
rozz-gtt GoEl
199r8 00vuo]0c 'llv
a^rrc l0ar3 0.ro9 I0z
slc3JHcuv
sNtvdot{ oNv NootltoNs
--fi/TFLvo
--------rrr7r^E
o3rvrncrve
$
$r
I
I
I
)
U
E
sS
L
$'
,?
t\
$-s
-ss
s
=
-
E
I,-+
s
-rs
*
-F
.g
+
FT
Et; I
s$i
HE
.g
T
-.9T35
Ti.g
sti3s
.g=:gss
+,{\
=-+
,J
ts($C.gs
:
=6-r5Et
€ss
s)
6-6
Cr+\'s
tg.
5_lt
-t4-T-3
=\t-
rJ
=,J[_F\S3Frt
\=_
s
-rfs
S:5
Sp$:.*g
: 5sIiHtd
v.
.S.otFI
N-i5'I
s*SJ-+:S=\+a
$E*;E
+
'-l ;
$-
./$:-
-,EIL-
ffi
=€*3
,9t*-rF
. sl.$-*3*[:JE
r<1
-g€3t.-!1g
€b
e
it_3
SE
.Rsrf
=6
.gIe
,Ee
$
IL
Ts-$.F
g=_
+5>ts
T.Lg.,F
EFE.\
=S'sls
$i
Eil
.9
-5€
:F
RE*+
€$
,,O',"rUl
s-.oS.s.rt .S-so s
\
. -s$
-.,sls
-ill-S.so /
.w
o
fi,.
4r;X 21, tttr
7, oVe| /6rr"-. * .L?4"rT
oo
h,l I
I?elllwve",
'A' . bnls, eA
, b--J. ,f ?zvav (- t'l
'"llrlLr*A
f=,*
I r( rlol acsr co Taltevn
-'tol)o' ";',e 'r ,,, \ilA
+-=-l.tq t{
rQ.x-'"
-- F!*o^ ^&tl ")"d.'
llzl't'
hnE*l truor*r wl. tuw . I-En- j26'lUql
<l \lttt7b. )ot?L ,lV\,i"ut.
" b" - allwnd, >Loune . t
" l[ratlz-J ?,* iid,,t f", (tal ' (^o''cltsrtro" )
D"cOtt
wd=u. (vil ry tr*-s(n '
- ,,lefi,Lo YolInn r^{itt- hollr,l 'r-J,^,
I
$rlrg
5d(
K?
fl\
l'*oGr,'*'l t** L \ ? ..'o
Uttllt p"*'.4 1ry..-c.-.^fi
ttd1+6o:
hA ,.-'t f*t
Cm<qn5
C"-\**\*' (=o^ \&-A , ;A
u-L J- ' s*r.,<- .,n,.'i..r-sJrt-
\^'r, -L\,^- t.- s*A)
\^{-Itt
,""t-L\,^
Q".L^ .*. J* = $hV
0k A*D *
ca.c-Qa- * & C.€,urro
,A N
i '{d* lafiunca.h"
I - h- p*.tl <n^ ru'/'io 1o?
I
"Tf tf'-l'\"
U
U^oo
L Lr"k &--.-f
$ rl/, ([-/*t-"n) u(- o-!-.-7a-J
7$.t2-rn ct.-{-2.;n n^.** ri a2[- at-t ///^-lrt-.\+ /^-,"1^ srt a/\ Aflb/ylt - ,4u
;."+
,afna-' il tt--'(' 4t,
C,l.l^lo\-^,.- '1" L^cz---(.
,uLnt 7.Ao"-
)onrur: d**1^ -( k^y!*
(Q,r^'* -l h.\ t^,-*L
aa
-:2
-_:)
it\-\A \,\^,...$\\qA- s L^^-,!,^.,tJ
@ &---l ^
+ L,qJ,u,*,
+-J>/ < t ,l fr
rt\-.-.,"_t -.\ ,^1.^\_ \....\
i\
t
lnwn n uffl
75 soulh frontage road
va il, colorado 8-1657
(303) 476-700O
January 30, 1987
, , ' ott)ce o/ cor;rr,runily development
t, qrl
Mr. Jeff l^linston
Wi nston Assoc i ates
1426 Pearl Street l'1al I
Boulder, Colorado 80302
Dear Jeff:
I have finally had a chance to sit donn wjth Peter to discuss the status of the
Gore Creek primenade. As you recall from our meeting on the 19th, there was
general support from the plople present to continue with efforts to develop a
Jnified streetscape improvement program. our next step will be to have another
meeting with RosenquisL in order to gauge his interest_jn.the project as the-
actual property owner. In addjtion, we need to start looking at the costs of
these improvements as they relate to the properties involved- To facilitate
these efiorts, we would like to have you develop two_alternative desjgn plans
for the promenade. l^le would like to ii*it th".e designs to general1y the same
level of detail as you have done on the "bumwaud" sketches. l'le basical 1y need
to consoijdate the nrteror. design alternatives you have generated into two
different schemes for the overali approach to the streetscape' Based on the
input from our meeting, t.r,e feel one alterative should be of the "circ1e" thetne,
while the other be the more rectangular or strajght line approach.
I have djscussed with Kristan her impressions of our meeting, and tve t,lould
reconmend the following be consjdered in developing these t;o alternatives:
1. Everyone seemed to favor a natural, inforrnal approach that respects the
existjng green space as much as possible.
Z. A strong foca'l point should be created at the base of the stairs for a- possibli sculpture site, and an additional focal point should be
lncluded soncvrhere jn the center of the promenade. The concept shor^rjng
the pavers "trailing off" into the open space seemed to be favored by
those present.
3. Ihene r.ias a consensus to use a combination of pavers and cottct"ete along
the streetsc;Pe.
rli
4. Seating areas should be inclrrded in the p1an, as t.rell as in:proventents to
the existing lighting in the area.
5. Consideration should be given to improvements that wil'l be visible jn
the winter months as vrel I as summer. Possibilities may include a
sculpture or possibly the up 'l ighting of trees.-
6. At the staff level , we have decided that efforfs should be concentrated
on the streetscape as opposed to any ddditjonal study of modifying Gore
Creek to create a skating pond.
I have enclosed a copy of a site p'l an done by Craig Snowdon sholing a
conceptual layout of the expansjon to Blu's and subsequent relocatjon of their
dining deck. Please try to.i ncorporate this relocation into the design of the
prornenade. One can assume the expansion of the interior space of the
restaurant will go up to the propenty 1ine. The deck expansion should be no
greater than what is comfortable given the redesign of the walkway. I would
agree with the idea of using tree grates with temporary chains or other means
of fencing to define the dining decks. There seemed to be no real opposition
to this concept at our meeting, and would suggest jndicating this type of
treatment on your drawings.
As I had stated, one of the next steps we have to take is to look at the cost
of improvements as they relate to property frontage along the pro,renade. 0nce
the tr^ro design scenarios are generated, I would like to get with you to once
again discuss the figures to be used in generatirrg cost estjmates for these
i mp roveme n ts .
Please do not hesjtate me with any questions you may have.'
Sincerely,
/ \ 'a^/ \61-
Thomas A. Braun
Sen i or Pl anner
TAB: bor
4/87
GORE CREEK PRO}MNADE IMPROVEMENTS
COST ESTI!'ATES
No.Size Cost
Totalcost
Aspens 9
Evergreens 4
Evergreens 5
Deciduous 9Crabapples )Green Ash )Cottonwoods )Shrubs/Chokecherry)
3il to 4n 91f5
8r-L0' 2 colo spruceg 532/ft = $2e0 ea2 Evergreene 2e/ft: $270 ea
6r- 81 3 Colo sprucee $30lft = $21-o ea3 Evergreens
@ i29/fE = $270 ea
2-!/2tt-3tt $22O each
a combination of 2 to 3 ofthese trees would be used
$ r.o3 s
$580
$540 r-120
$os o
$8r-o t44o
1980
$ 5s75
2500
l_0, 000
l-8, 075
:tThese nunbers assume that the Sitznark 20r tree,Plaza 20r tree and Blurs 3 clulnps of aspenare replanted
Benches
Relocation of
T.o.V. VillageIights
5
irrigation
TotaL Landscaping,
@ 95oo ea
(nininal cost accordingto Public Works)
0 $2soollight
Total Project Cost,
O 4/87
Cost Estimates frorn Ellison Designs
Large Deciduous Shrubs (4 - 6 ft-i I - l0 gat)
i.e Serviceberry )
Mugo Pine )
Small Deciduous Shrubs (5 gal)
i.e. Potentilla )Redtwig DogwoodAlpine CurrentShrub Rose
Golden Elder
Honeysuckle
0 $18 ea
Evergreen and Broadleaf Evergreen Shrubs (5 gal)
0 $22 ea
Nannyberry Viburnurn ) Rky Mtn Birch ) € $eO
Cistena PIum )
i.e. Junipers
$zracanthaOregon Grape
Manzanita
Groundcovers and Perennial FlosrersFLats (25 plants/flat) e 924 eaIgal €g6ea
Colorado gpruce
5-8ft eg3o/ft $2Lo8 - r.o ft e 932/ft 29o10 - 12 ft e s3s/ft 39012 - up € $38lft 42o +
Other Evergreen Trees (8 - 10 ft)
i.e. Bristlecone Pine )Ponderosa Pine )Lodgepole Pine ) 0 i29/ft 2'to.ooConcolor Fir )
Aspen 2'r - 3rr caliper 0 995 ea3,r - 4rr caliper € $LL5 ea4rr - 5tt caliper 0 $L50 ea
Other Deciduous TreesL-I7zn - 2rr caliper e g17o ea2tt - 2-L/2 | caliper € 9190 ea2-L12n - 3rr cal-iper e 9220 ea3tt - 3-L/2'! caliper e 9255 eai.e. crabapples, green ash, cottonwoods, shubertchokecherry
Note:Tlre above unit costs are based uppon averagedwholesale prices as found in Colorado nurserLespracticing state nursery standards. Truckloadordering (100 pieces ninimun) can be valued forsavings of up to 40 percent if purchase is rnadedirect with tree brokers. Tyically, savings ofthis nagnl-tude can be realized prinarily throughthe purchase of evergreen and deciduous trees.Buying broker dlrect reduces high risk because ofdigging and freight reliability.
lnwn
75 south lrontago road. vall, colorado 81657
(3O3) 476-7OOO
July 12, 1988
ttr. Bob FritchSitzmark Lodge
L83 E. Gore Creek Dr.vail , co 8L657
RE: Costs for Gore Creek Pronenade
Dear Bob:
Stan Berryrnan has reviewed the costs for the portion of theGore Creek Promenade which you built last surnner. He asked meif I could get some general. quantities for the project from youso that he can better review the bills. He asked that youprovide estimates on the square footage of pavers, amount ofconcrete, and landscaping for the project. In general , hethought the figures lrere reasonable. However, the guantityinforrnation will be very helpful . If you have any furtherquestions, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
l/^ \ fl.r
firth', YrffrKristan Pritz
Town Planner
KP:Kc
4/87
GORE CREEK PROMENADE IMPROVEMENTS
COST ESTII'IATES
No.Size Cost
Total
Cost
Aspens 9
Evergreens 4
Evergreens 6
Deciduous 9Crabapples )Green Ash )Cottonwoods )Shrubs/Chokecherry)
3tr to 4r $115
8f-10t 2 Colo Spruce
@ $32/ft = $2902 Evergreen
@ 29/ft = S27o
6r- 81 3 colo Sprucee $30lft = $21-o3 Evergreens
e 92e/ft = $2'7o
2-L12tr-3tr $220 each
a combination of 2 to 3 ofthese trees would be used
s 1035
ea $580
ea $540 1.120
ea $630
ea $810 L44O
L980
$ 5575
2500
l_o, ooo
1_8,075
rrThese numbersPlaza 20r treeare replanted
Benches
Relocation of
T.O.V. Villagelights
assume that the Sitznark 2or tree,and Blu I s 3 clurnps of aspen
Total Landscaping,
5 e $500 ea
irrigation (rnininal cost accordingto Public Works)
€ $2500/light
Total Project Cost,
I O 4/87
Cost Estimates fron Ellison Designs
Large Deciduous Shrubs (4 - 6 ft; 7 - 10 gal)
i.e Serviceberry
Nannyberry Viburnurn )
ea
Cistena PIun
Mugo Pine
Rky Mtn Birqh ) @ $60
Small Deciduous Shrubs (5 gal)
i.e. Potentilla )Redtwig Dogrwood )Alpine current ) G $ls ea
Shrub Rose )Golden Elder )Honeysuckle )
Evergreen and Broadleaf Evergreen Shrubs (5 gal)
i.e. Junipers
$zracanthaOregon Grape
Manzanita G $22 ea
Groundcovers and Perennial FlowersFlats (25 plants/fla|-) @ $24 ealgal @$6ea
Colorado Spruce6-8ft e93o/fr $21_o8 - 10 ft e 932/ft zeo10 - 12 ft e $35lft 3eo12 - up e $38lft 42o +
Other Evergreen Trees (8 - LO ft)
i.e. Bristlecone Pine )Ponderosa Pine )Lodgepole Pine ) 0 929/ft 27o.OOConcolor Fir )
Aspen 2't - 3tt caliper B $ss ea
3n - 4rr caliper 0 $l-15 ea4r _ 5n caliper 0 $15O ea
Other Deciduous TreesL-L/2n - 2rr caliper € $17O ea2n - 2-L/2 I caliper € $190 ea2-L/2t - 3rr caliper € $220 ea3n - 3-L/2r' caliper e $255 eai.e. crabapples, green ash, cottonwoods, shubert
chokecherry
'l 3
Note:The above unit costs are based uppon averaged
wholesale prices as found in Colorado nurseriespracticing state nursery standards. Truckloadordering (1oo pieces rninimum) can be valued forsavings of up to 40 percent if purchase is madedirect with tree brokers. Tyically, savings ofthis magnitude can be realized primarily throughthe purchase of evergreen and deciduous trees.euying broker direct reduces high risk because ofdigging and freight reliability.
J. r.oo
!$n
[; D oear ctneico
lr.W cor,rua o( \bthhd
k"s'S,rP'Sffi*$S;**nBa^el
O 4/s7
GORE CREEK PROMENADE IMPROVEMENTS
COST ESTIMATES
No. Size Cost
Total
Cost
Aspens 9 3n to 4rr 9f15 S fors
Evergreens 4 8r-l-0 1 2 ColoSprucee $32/ft = i29o ea $seo2 Evergreeng 29/fE = $27O ea $540 LL2O
Evergreens 6 5r- 8f 3 Colo Spruceg $30lft = $21-0 ea $5303 Evergreens
@ 529/tt = $27o ea $8L0 t44o
Deciduous 9 2-L/2x-3n $220 eachCrabapples )Green Ash ) a conbination of 2 to 3 ofcottonhroods ) these trees would be usedShrubs/Chokecherry)
*These nunbers assume that the Sitznark 20r tree,Plaza 2Or tree and B1urs 3 clumps of aspenare replanted
Total Landscaping, $ SSZS
1980
Benches 5 egsooea
Relocation of irrigation (ninirnal cost accordingto Public Works)
T.o.V. Villagelights 4 e $2soo,zlight
2500
10, 000
Total Project Cost, g l_9,075
t
Mugo Pine )
Snall Deciduous Shrubs (5 qal)
i.e. Potentilla )Redtwig Dogwood
A1pine Current
Shrub Rose
€ 918 ea
Golden Elder )Honeysuckle )
Evergreen and Broadleaf Evergreen Shrubs (5 gal)
i.e. Junipers )Pyracantha
Oregon crape
Manzanita G $22 ea
Groundcovers and Perennial FlowersFlats (25 plants/flat) e 924 eaIgal 0$eea
Colorado Spruce6-8fr e$30lft 92108 - 10 ft e $2/tt 2eoL0 - 12 ft g #s/ft 3eo12 - up e $38lft 42O +
Other Evergreen Trees (g - 10 ft)
i. e. Bristl-econe pine )Ponderosa PineLodgepole PineConcolor Fir e 92e/fE
Aspen
2rr - 3n caliper 0 995 ea3rr - 4rr caliper 0 gL15 ea4 - 5rr caliper 0 gL50 ea
Other Deciduous TreesL-tlZn - 2!' caliper @ g17O ea2.t - 2-L/2 | caliper € gL90 ea2-L/2n - 3rr caliper e S22O ea3,. - 3-L/2tr caliper @ 9255 eai.e. crabapples, green ash, cottonwoods, shubertchokecherry
Nannyberry Viburnun ) Rky Mtn Birch ) @ $60
Cistena Plun )
27 0. OO
O 4/87
Cost Estj-mates fron Ellison Designs
Large Deciduous Shrubs (4 - 6 fLe Z - lO 9a1)
i.e Serviceberry )
o,I
Note:lfhe above unit costsvholesale prLces as
are based uppon averagedfound in Colorado nurseriespracticing state nursery standards. Truckloadordering (100 pieces ninimurn) can be valued forsavings 9f up to 40 percent if purchase is nadedirect with tree brokers. tyicltty, savJ.ngs ofthis nagmltude can be realized prilnarily throuqhthe purchase of evergreen and dlciduous trees. -
Buying broker dlrect reduces high risk because ofdigging and freight reliability.
tr*. U*k ?**'
? [. \ .;"-k 0t"-" l*
51"{t G- Q '
--,ir-r1-/ *-c^.- \-.-
/)l .
S l-.
,\t..ttz
8^.-k .., t *vr{r.lr,*,,^1 L
r*L *',.-JI
*{ur.''(o
*lo4 0^.^t''* f-*"',1
0""k K
IF-
/^r41+-
.s,! r\\.[^
I
i
I
tl:l
-t
I'-l
I
rl
I
I-,1tl
---'----- lI
ti
tl
t,
-_____l
..[-*t-C^.I"
tl
l,_,:_.__jf ,
Anlttr't . l. I n rl \\\ '. - *zY-U bo,n-.-#- o**\O \-
(';
\r:
\
\
\
L &lln" lr "f\-^A*" ,- {.+ 4*,^1
l-^[ &tar7 ^- @,4. f,,.'*0",^ (, ,-- \'e,',-r
{ o,J + &-f.J)
''' AtY Fr},-,.--,-\..o
- $. L,^r'^iNe-- f *L f}-.*^*.^t
r& l.n^'Q.* +"- Anr&^\ < 6s T>
lJ""*
ryt0{k
I
-T--ti
'---ia- -
tlll
I
I
i
I