The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPEC080015 Notes/CommentsO ` ~ Nn~~,2~ ri U. ~V. co,r• tv, oto~ ~~A1'ln~r d& cam FKA ~1 c~LCC ` 1./t P_JY l: ~n~~li✓1'~C r'1 M1~ ~F-- l7114A, may, 1 c h 4¢~ Co r1pr 'Fr~Sf er s- L V t`vvS-{~~EG. 30(. bs-7. Illy Vt t,~ A ra v a.u 4,,rf l u 4ebt-S . o A-c- , r o. c "c'-e. 6A T Al /I 3/~,O/DQ a'r , I~~-r~ eve r pv-l J 40 A-#rlc~w V 's 4 o-C, ' o~-~ Cgs ~ Al i L Le -e d-4 all lee s. VLII tAj ~1n-t s vs 7 W ~oj~ Ago-& Ahe e ,k.«te-v--72: V"4: a2 mx y~ ~hg cu - _ ~ r~(,•YL'v~ 1 ~ ~ {l/L?.E' I I " ~`lC.~ F. ~ T I N..L,.c G1,,.,1n.,,~,. ~ V" `.P-,c ~ OQ,~ ~i..~. u - Oro 514~~ w 0 C~~ ~ z 1 U`2 XIL - - y~z~ °L t _ acs, ins r - ~N k-a-v 40 1/xt v 67z • V*¢ - Mew rn e kp ]~c ~rL+ r-e T , l ~ 7.~ E nr.w. , lip - a-- - - - - II - - - - - -1- - - f _ wy 4-- - f 1 c Q.a S o~ Gr2-4 2) - ran-e~ p w..~-~ ►-t 5~ _,~Q D~ o f - L~ wt ► ~e S 1'3, C t- ,-e I-e av~-►-P~ - c4j-4~ s s . . I-IA t j)vI, ve r•z • / n C 1.s~1n ll G~ ~.yve J wQ~.~ Cl~l~ e e-mil -t-z- Ss LC) I -TrAtA O-P E FC , ~YC F I . `l 7 ` O -7 ( y co CK-~~ (Ala -0- Nb4 40 S~- Page 1 of 1 Nicole Peterson - Re: Market plaza PEC approval L From: Nicole Peterson To: Mike Foster; Warren Campbell Date: 02/24/2009 8:16 AM Subject: Re: Market plaza PEC approval CC: 'Anne F. Gunion'; George Ruther; 'Michael O'Connor'; 'Rick Pylman' Mike, Nt~„A , -wh ( A f - I After the meeting yesterday, Staff discussed the main criticism's heard at the meeting and listed the following: 1. Neighbors are protective of landscaping along the south side 2. Canyon effect 3. Digital model accuracy 4. Loading and delivery on E. Meadow Drive? 5. Future trans ortation needs? In response to the opposition, Staff discussed the possibility of including future transportation needs (i.e. additional bus lanes and loading & delivery) to the model. I would agree that it would be helpful to lower the building. Please let us know if you are agreeable to showing the model, and if you agree that we should incorporate future transportation needs. Thanks much, _ Nicole ~ U cC ac Q t e~Q 5~~~,~ "Mike Foster" <MikeF@triumphdev.com> 02/24/2009 6:15 AM Nicole / Warren, Thanks for all your help yesterday in receiving a 3-2 approval at PEC. Now we need to discuss when you would suggest going to Town Council. We have two thoughts on that, go as soon as possible OR wait for either meeting in April, your thoughts? We either need to work more on the model OR just not show it to the council. The model is still showing the building too tall. I think the building is to be lowered by half a level at the very least. The residential element appears to tall across from the Mountain Haus. I think dropping the elevation and reducing some square footage would help that canyon affect. I will continue to work with Anne at VAg to further study both those issues. Nicole / Warren, would either of you have time to meet with Michael O'Connor and myself this morning in person or on the phone to talk about the next steps? Please let me know, Thanks again, Mike Foster, Architect, Development Manager Triumph West Development, LLC 8120 Woodmont Avenue suite 800 - Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301-657-1112p 303-475-4413c 303-953-8626f www.triumphdev.com s~ about:blank 02/24/2009 - oa~l ~ fAct s im ct- (AjTr~.~ , x v V, X s' - O I~ t, s ~ -fE~ _ . reS ~4-6~ rc e - - t'l (14 0-n '4,n l~vk -(p r i„/ O-C V _ d-ft-d re 3-~ o a4 V~~'f tint ~Zs ~ V CA" ecA _ s 7 ~e • I C,~2S l G, CL tn~ S OL to_, (/I s c~ e L9 -1 cztt t e- - ro w. c ~ fk C v S ~v E I C\~ '~2 Q-~- e r s -V ~~c I~w V I If 1 uv~, Piz CYob(~ -'f-w'' v~'-' ~ ~ 6 S~ ~f~ - • 1.~~0~-~CS o~ C Pew - - - -c -F c Q _ _ ~ • _ e~-~, _ _ _--`~C- ? _ ~~___-_-_-tip -T -5 - - - - - - _ _ - A-CAAA -iv ? \ -41 ' Z a r~sd 10 't (All ke~ C-s r -t ~i Lls ~ C7 yv" DOC,2 b vC °~~7s~ G. ~r ZSz h f Iue "oo" C e-- " 01 .1 k IIQLIJ II - /J Le C 4 C S' - Vin t, V-e cup _ ;k1 Qec~ a A (f / CIO - O-C 1 70 a b - -loo --~w~ ---1 a J J_ ak U, I/L-4 CA d-10 esn Paz- Av Lim be,6)"~4 le (i av o- . 14- j gal, ~ t6k .x or 6w o`er 101 P-Af v 4 kc,K-f s-IT s D-FL /),76LCI~ 04 V\-04 v1 O_r III I l (f f s L -7t---' SIN Nor Y - ~ -ms's _~s . - - s~~~ ~ - ~ - - r~ Agenda: VA KtX VAg, Inc. Architects & Planners Project Name: Triumph Development - Market Plaza Date: March 4, 2009 RE: Project Worksession FROM: Pedro Campos, ASLA Anne Gunion, AIA Gayle Wright TO: Mike Foster Greg Hall CC: 1. Meeting Kick-off 1. Introductions 2. Review goals of meeting II. Overall Streetscape and Circulation VAG, Inc Architects & Planners Project No: 2730.00 Triumph Development Town of Vail Public Works Department 1. Potential Roundabout at east end of existing garage 2. Turn-around and drop-off area in front of Mountain Haus 3. Possible location of Market Plaza sub-surface parking access 4. Landscaping along street & courtyards III. Transit Center Studies 1. Various transit alternatives - varying intensity of change and redevelopment from existing condition 2. Opportunities and constraints of each 3. Town preferences IV. Discussion and Next Steps 1. Feedback on studies 2. Next Steps in the process c END OF AGENDA Physical Address: (970) 949-7034 Mailing Address: 90 Benchmark Rd., Suite 202 fax: (970) 949-8134 P.O. Box 1734 Avon, CO 81620 email: general@vagarchitects.com Vail, CO 81658-1734 kc _ kl-d-" W1,11. ~x V 4ttA s (t ~ e r I v o-~ b ai ~ s Cho ~ ~ (-SL~G~ 40 C o.! P r `7-V "TCI -f'~,0~ ~ ~~(~•~T~b~2X~ (r'a i.~ c~ "f" ~ t.(.ci1 S ~ rc~f-~ CX~ rl,44 4--7 Uj o6- _ G.. d c E ms' lM.~c ` } C ° s '~a ail W I 14- -e "&foe L,-J~ B- C'51 - ---tz-Le - 40 - - - ~ ?J 3 te t t PC -tA - 1ts~ tom ` R L, - L'iw",,44- - - A _ _ G~/1-l~-Ll~^'f -~--+~_~.~._~Yn•,V e'^d~G~L{`~~ 7~~~!~re-_--. • IAA ~o v 6G C~tl 111° - 2 -i S - ~tru- 4 D, v,;i h p,A, - A--r- i/v (W4 ~4 6 a ( C t\le (4A6~- Tt-f4o 0-- - 6G (0- ( I-e-R) c The conceptual design proposal envisioned for the site employs a traditional approach to design in its residential components. The placement of residential units on upper floors or in `brownstone' scaled buildings is a standard tradition in urban areas large and small to create rows of modestly scaled attached residential units. Goal #4: To preserve existing open space areas and expand green space opportunities. The Southeast, West and North sides of the parking structure would be maintained and enhanced with organic landscaping elements to transition smoothly into the Vail Village core area. Open plazas should be maintained as urban gardens, entertainment squares, and outdoor dining patios. This area is currently designated as a "planted buffer area" in the current version of the Vail Village Master Plan and is not recognized by the document as an important open space. Goal 45: Increase and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the transportation and circulation system throughout the village. An infill development in this area should be accomplished without major closures of the parking structure and may in actuality fix many of the existing structural problems currently existing. Any infill building here should remain independent of the parking structure, which would allow for future expansion of the parking structure. Locating mixed use program elements in the core of town and adjacent to public transportation encourages maximum pedestrian circulation and minimal vehicular traffic. The expansion of private parking for the project can potentially occur via access through the existing parking structure and underground of the new buildings. Goal #6: To ensure the continued improvement of the vital operational elements of the Village. This amendment would allow for a project that will address important community needs and Master Plan considerations without precluding future options for the Village Parking Structure. It will allow for the continued operation of the existing facility and allow for future development with the potential of additional service and delivery facilities. In addition, the gateway created will enhance and improve the guest experience and circulation. K 13 4 Page 1 of 4 Nicole Peterson - RE: vail market plaza update From: "Anne F. Gunion" To: "Jeff Winston" "Chase Mullen" "MikeFoster" "Nicole Peterson" Date: 03/16/2009 8:44 AM Subject: RE: vail market plaza update To All; Please see my comments below. Anne Anne Fehlner Gunion AIA NCARB Founding Principal annefg@vagarchitects.com VAg, Inc. Architects & Planners 970.949.7034 PO Box 1734 970.949.8134 fax Vail, CO 81658-1734 The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that is confidential and is protected by architect-client or other privileges, or constitutes non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Winston [mailto:jtwinston@winstonassociates.com] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 7:45 AM To: Chase Mullen; Mike Foster; Nicole Peterson; steve@triumphdev.com; Anne F. Gunion Subject: Re: vail market plaza update Warren, Nicole, Anne, Two thoughts in reviewing the latest model: 1. Big Picture Transit Accommodations When Warren, Nicole and I met with Greg Hall after the last meeting, one of the revelations was that Public Works had actually given quite a bit of thought to future transit needs in the vicinity of the parking structure, including an expansion (to the south) of the upper deck of the structure, and how the rail system might work (either in the median, or adjacent to the frontage road, 30' in the air, with an elevated connection to a transit station on the parking structure). I came away with the impression that this was a very important consideration in using the Market Plaza infill to mask the transit center improvements. There really isn't a good way to do them, aesthetically, without Market Plaza. This was to be part of the subject matter of our follow up net meeting work session with Greg, which was then cancelled in favor of Anne and Greg geting file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\49BE11... 03/16/2009 Page 2 of 4 together separately to discuss these items and Anne drawing them up. I don't see these ideas referred to in Anne's drawings. Were they discussed? Are they incorporated into the new layout? Are they going to be shown in a separate diagram? IT IS ESSENTIAL TO SHOW THEM IN ORDER TO RESPOND TO JIM LAMONT'S GOOD QUESTIONS! Mike Foster and I are meeting tomorrow to review the concepts and then we will diagram them up for incorporation into the model. Please note that based upon what I know to date on Greg's thoughts I believe it is a really good thing that we have incorporate some 4 story elements as it will most likely be the only way to disguise the extra level. 2. Canyon Effect In looking over the latest version of the building massing, Chase pointed out a section that comes close to a 1:1 ratio--right at the NE corner of the Mtn Haus. While this is allowed in the W Guidelines, I wonder if, in response to the comments received from the public, one wouldn't want to shape the Market Plaza massing differently. For example, either put the low section (that is now just east of the stairs) further east (reversing it with the taller section to the east). Or, perhaps just tapering up more gradually from the low section, with a two story section opposite the Mtn Haus. I think taking a look from the balcony of one of the low corner units of the Mtn Haus might help Anne decide which is best. Should we have Chase also do a "before" version with the existing trees on the berm? Showing the transit improvements WITHOUT Market Plaza? We can easily bring this area down some more. I will sketch something up, review with Mike and Steve and send off for revision to the model. In regard to the section of building just to the East of the existing main stairs, it is current being shown as a two story structure. It was our intention that that area albeit less deeps in areas still reflect a 3 to 4 story mass as depicted in the revised street elevation. I think I perhaps confused Chase in our discussion last week. The area I intended to be 1 to 2 stories is only in the two small pocket park areas between the 3 to 4 story portions as shown on the street plate. If it is possible can we put the old section of the area just to the East of the stairs back and add the revised `two-gable' roof design and review what that looks like. Jeff On 3/15/09 3:10 PM, "Chase Mullen" <chase@winstonassociates.com> wrote: > Here are some new images, I have to clean up a few bits, plant some trees and > such but here is the new model. The tight section shown is just a bit under > the 1:1 ration 48' wide and -45' tall. > Conf call info for tomorrow > 1800.430.0714 > 3203069 > I will give the WebEx number over the phone, see you all at 2. > Chase Mullen > GIS / visual Specialist file://C:\Documents and Settings\AdministratorTocal Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\49BE11... 03/16/2009 i IV Page 3 of 4 > WINSTON ASSOCIATES > > 4696 Broadway Boulder CO 80304 > 303-440-9200 (p) > 303-449-6911 (f) > chase@winstonassociates.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Foster [mailto:MikeF@triumphdev.com] > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:27 AM > To: Chase Mullen; 'Nicole Peterson' > Cc: steve@triumphdev.com; 'Anne F. Gunion' > Subject: RE: Triumph Dev estimate > Nicole, > I just spoke with Chase and gave him the go ahead on modifying the model. I > asked him to be quick so we can keep the cost at the 3k estimate. > He is still needing the streetscape information from you, he said you were > aware of this. Can you please get him that information as soon as possible? > Thanks, > Mike Foster, Architect, Development Manager > Triumph West Development, LLC > 8120 Woodmont Avenue > > suite 800 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 > 301-657-1112p > 303-475-4413c > 303-953-8626f > www.triumphdev.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Chase Mullen [mailto:chase@winstonassociates.com] > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:32 AM > To: Nicole Peterson > Cc: MikeF@triumphdev.com; steve@triumphdev.com > Subject: RE: Triumph Dev estimate > The building changes will happen rather quickly but there is going to be a > considerable amount of grading/landscape work to make it believable. I would > estimate about 3-4 days and $3k-4k. > One thing that I do need from you Nicole is the landscape improvements that > have been installed along E Meadow Dr. so that those improvements can show > up along side the "proposed" ones. > Chase Mullen > GIS / Visual Specialist > WINSTON ASSOCIATES > 4696 Broadway > Boulder CO 80304 > 303-440-9200 (p) > 303-449-6911 (f) > chase@winstonassociates.com file://CADocuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\49BE11... 03/16/2009 Page 4 of 4 ' > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicole Peterson [mailto:npeterson@vailgov.com] > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:35 AM > To: Chase Mullen > Cc: MikeF@triumphdev.com; steve@triumphdev.com > Subject: Triumph Dev estimate > Morning Chase, > I didn't hear from you yesterday, about the estimate. I'm out of the office > today, therefore please email the estimate and 'reply to all, instead of > calling. Thanks much! > Best, > Nicole K u file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\49BE11... 03/16/2009 Page 1 of 1 Nicole Peterson - Proposed Berm Development %W From: Joe McHugh To: Date: 03/15/2009 4:54 PM Subject: Proposed Berm Development CC: Lamont Jim Ladies and Gentlemen: I am stunned that the Town Council would give any consideration whatsoever to the proposed amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan to permit private, mixed use development of the landscaped berm on the South side of the Vail Village Transportation Center. The proposed private development would replace the beautiful landscaped buffer between the transportation center and the village proper with an unsightly urban development which would further urbanize and "canyonize" the center of Vail and further diminish its ambiance. And has anyone given any thought to the fact that adding more retail space with more competing retailers adjacent to the transportation center will exacerbate the problems of our already struggling retailers in Vail Village? The Council could better to devote its time and energies to solving the large and growing parking problem and other economic issues faced by the Town of Vail. The proposal currently under study - to charge visitors for parking on the frontage roads - is another appalling proposal. The recent exorbitant increases in parking fees in the Vail Village Transportation Center have succeeded in driving away much of the tradesmen's traffic which has clogged the parking structure for a few years, but has also infuriated and alienated many local and visitor users and driven them to go elsewhere or to park on the frontage roads - thereby exacerbating the frontage road parking problem on weekends. Please use common sense and vote against these two absurd proposals. Sincerely, Joe McHugh 4014 Bighorn Road Vail, CO file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\49BE29... 03/16/2009 Vail Villa,-,c Master Plan C TRANSPORTATION CENTER (#4) U TRANSPORTATION :J CENTER - 4_2 FAST NE ACUw _ EAR r;V V\AIA~~1`' 77 o0UNt W "AIM Y •Ak AMem Cl0/ / The only existing facility within this sub-area is the Vail Village Transportation Center (TRC). The TRC serves as the transportation hub of the Village and the entire community. There is potential for future expansion of the parking structure eastward along with other ancillary development potential... Foremost among these is development over the expansion of the parking structure. The primary purpose of this sub-area is to provide parking for the entire Village area. The priority of any expansion to this facility should be to maximize the amount: of additional public parking available at this site. An important consideration in future expansion of the TRC is the view corridors as depicted in the Building Height Profile. 94-1 TRC Expansion (Complete) This site has long been considered the logical location for future expansions to the Vail Transportation Structure. Any expansion should maximize the number of additional public parking spaces. There is a potential for a one to two story structure over the parking expansion to accommodate some type of public purpose facility. Special emphasis on 3.1, 3.2, 5.1, 5.3, 5.4. #4-2 East Meadow Drive Infill This site is appropriate for infill development. Currently the area consists of a la+seepe befi*~ that provides screening and structural support to the south side of the Vail Village Parking Structure. Infill of this site would add needed vitality to the East Meadow Drive streetscape, create a strong pedestrian connection between Vail Valley Drive and Willow Bridge Road and provide a more defined edge to this portion of Vail Village. The potential uses of this site should support the goals of providing additional retail, office and local ownership housing into Vail Village. It will be important for any infill development to provide parking consistent with town regulations to support the uses. Commercial uses should be located west of ~~idge Plarza-and on both sides of major portals to and from the parking structure to suppo treetscape vitality, while the land east of the main pedestrian access portal should be predominately residential. A variety of three and four story building heights are appropriate ay ross the sub-area ~his infill should not preclude future options for re-development of the V I Village Parking StrOure. Special emphasis on 1.3, 2.4,2.6,3.3,5.1. Co►-►~iShG rf- ~t~ = -61 dPA 5 l i r-.u2 ~l ~4~. &-'PFf Q NT. ~r~r-; Imo. VAI 1 dive Nbswr Plan 0 0 f g ~ 1 q R Y~+ i ~ t l rt k A ; P gZ - ~ t a i` 0 _ Q ill up ( f ~ oi l 3 11 IU A s ~ i Yry~ $ 25 1 J LIO Vail Master Plan V Z W Q W C X Z 0 W (1) W cc O V W d J 0 Z CI) CA d z D J_ q7 32 Fail Village Master Plan ~.t a 'y Y . 1 a ~ ~ ff j ~ 5~S CL l t 8z a • t9 1 A F~ } 3 a ¢ ' tJ i t tt s- / i yl t ju. ai l~} 1 1 w. t ~ r SI SI~~ ~ x s 1 O , 17 w iv, uj 7.1 , 1 p~ 4Pt ~ ttHf K t' 4 S{7 ~ 1 :"43~ 5~,-.LJ:~ _ R gyp, _ ~ E i t w . hl ' , f R 5' a r # !9 ~ t ri 1 if ~ x 2KS S t 3 y, r ! t t ( 4s'1 "Y ! ~ F t ~ 'li alai 7 f sakt _ v J 7 wf ; y,` j i 3 :'i t t 2 i ipE € { t! ? 4 99 ~ L T ; ~ t k c >S J € 0 0 0 34 (02/02/2009) Nicole Peterson - RE: Market Place - Village Parking Structure 3D Page 1 From: To: Date: Subject: Attachments: Forgot that "Chase Mullen" <chase@winstonassociates.com> <GRuther@vailgov.com>, <npeterson@vailgov.com> 01/30/2009 12:38 PM RE: Market Place - Village Parking Structure 3D vail_airphoto.jpg Chase Mullen GIS / Visual Specialist WINSTON ASSOCIATES 4696 Broadway Boulder CO 80304 303-440-9200 (p) 303-449-6911 (f) chase@winstonassociates.com Air From: Chase Mullen Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 12:37 PM To: 'GRuther@vailgov.com'; 'npeterson@vailgov.com' Cc: 'Jeff Winston' Subject: Market Place - Village Parking Structure 3D Jeff has brought it to my attention that Mike Foster is expecting a 3D presentation at the Feb. 9th meeting. We (Nicole, George, Jeff and 1) need to get into a conference call either with or without Mike Foster and decide what the timeline is for this project and what the city wants to see in the model (level-of-detail, scope, existing parking structure, other code items like maximum building envelop) ASAP, give us a call. If there is any chance of me making the Feb. 9 presentation I need drawing sets ( roof, site, and elevations ) drawings/blue prints on the highlighted building and the parking structure by Monday morning. I also need the topo, airphoto, and lot-lines for the entire city (I did talk with Shawn earlier this week and he was working on it but I have not received anything yet). From: "Steve Hawkins" <steveh@mountainhaus.com> To: George Ruther<gruther@vailgov.com> Date: 12/31/2008 1:27 PM Subject: Mtn Haus / Notice to multiple contacts / 2008.12.31 Dear George, It has been suggested that we request multiple contacts here at the Mountain Haus for any official information regarding Triumph Development's application for amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan relating to the Vail Village Parking Structure site. These contacts should also survive in the event this application goes into any future form of development on the Vail Village Parking Structure site. We request that all notices be forwarded to the following contacts: Steve Hawkins General Manager Vail's Mountain Haus at the Covered Bridge 292 East Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Barbara Banks General Council Mountain Haus Home Owner's Association Banks & Imatani, P.C. 225 Union Blvd., Suite 310 Lakewood, CO 80228 And, Mr. Tad Smith 6 i 1 Page 2 President, Board of Directors Mountain Haus Home Owner's Association 207 Quail Run, PO Box 831 Alto, NM 312 We would appreciate your confirmation of reciept of this e-mail. Regards, Steve Steve Hawkins General Manager Vail's Mountain Haus at the Covered Bridge 292 East Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 USA 800.237.0922 Reservations 970.476.2434 Voice 970.476.3007 Fax <http://www.mountainhaus.com> www.mountainhaus.com Vail's premier Boutique Hotel in the heart of Vail Village P Vail's Mountain Haus GOES GREEN. Please don't print this message unless you need to. Thank you for thinking green! EO I! 11 vii l CJ ~ 1 A 0 Sera F'^xf r r rS, V r , . -4w . ,C (IV a4v ~ (J Y~;I ~L f Gtiq l -TOP S4Ztir - r v►~~. - 4,LO c -Aa 6,1 u DI OJ't!~, _ __1 _CA V,,, o At GLi J c c,~o,., w~ U (L .S i o rte- r dZ)T I s 0 v V -77 QJ 5:'l vw~ l Cvr ~b AS U-'---eZ, ~ r Co T.1 r rj~/l~ bu, Vy. ou ei - r '-L -1 i ` (l1 C;.71/'C>.li` j~5wv+ s v~o+- 5i,re 9-1,!, v--~ -4-~ S4c,,; e -I r < wZ cr„ s S 1.aP 41n, (I~U~ 14o, r (AD Ll 40 X5.2 ct'- f" r-1 , -(5 4ybA,c, U et - - 0 n V Z f Z l09 i G uJD u, ? Scpz~ ~1 0V `FoV,r:) r4 11; 1PAr-ris Co ru "r:k4E. Dad 6--1opmr=" - L1V 0i l C FvtLT `-a- i 0+41 _ 4c~ Clh'r k_f%i A . ~ w ~ - ~ ~ ~ f I _ • ~ . _ I fir. _ ~ I _ • . ~ ~ ~ •'I R! )~!~Q_ GAY! _ - . _ - _ - _ _ _ . inn _ x- s6 i# Z ►K" r 1% c .i ~~1,.1~-Q ~_.--lea ~ ~ ~ ~ l_-_. 'ILI Y S a ~~.15-- ' Z l~ J/I .t• fPJ L_`~T1C7~---..~0!~ / / /~J ~A- ~Cf~J • -...-_~.a ~ - ~1~.►4i.~--~~-~-W4• •~-i O~-_.51~~.._._S~_-_._E.. YVIt'-,~S~,c.1 ~ ~ ~lE_ _ _ L,-Q 15 -%Ac ham owl - - - 1 maw - ~ - - fth c C] ~L.~ . - lea to - i • • /Y L►.~. r- lAzle,- 04 ~F, -c.