HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-10-19 Agenda and Supporting Documentation Town Council Afternoon Meeting Agenda
VAIL TO W N C O U N C IL R E G U L AR ME E TIN G
Agenda
Town Council C hambers and Virtual on Zoom
1:50 P M, October 19, 2021
Meeting to be held in C ouncil Chambers and Virtually on
Zoom (access H igh Five Access Media livestream day of the
meeting)
Notes:
Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine what time Council will
consider an item.
Public comment on any agenda item may be solicited by the Town Council.
1.Presentation / Discussion
1.1.Art in Public Places Update 20 min.
Presenter(s): Molly Eppard, Art in Public Places Coordinator
Action Requested of Council: I nformation only. No action requested.
Background:
The purpose of this item is to update Town Council on:
Completed projects from summer 2021
The potential donation of works from the collection of Vicki and Kent
Logan
Strategic Plan update
Ford Park Art Space
The Fifteenth Annual Vail W interfest
1.2.W est Vail Master Plan Update - Presentation & Discussion 60 min.
Presenter(s): Matt Gennett, Community Development Director
Action Requested of Council: To view the presentation and provide
feedback.
Background: After four presentations with discussion and deliberations, on
October 11, 2021, the P E C voted 6-0 (Pratt absent) to forward a
recommendation of approval of the West Vail Master Plan with one
condition of approval. The condition of approval is “that the proposed
modifications agreed to by the P E C be incorporated into the final draft of
the plan upon adoption”. The consultant team and staff are now working on
incorporating the P E C’s proposed modifications into the final draft for
Council’s consideration on November 2, 2021.
1.3.Review "GoE V City" Program and pledge to implement strategies to reduce
transportation related emissions (Resolution No. 48, Series of 2021)
30 min.
Presenter(s): Kristen Bertuglia, Director of Environmental Sustainability
and Stefan J ohnson, Transportation Program Manager, Clean Energy
Economy for the Region (C L E E R)
Action Requested of Council: I nformational Presentation with action on
Resolution No. 48, Series 2021 during evening meeting.
Background: The GoE V Coalition invited the Town of Vail to become a
member of the “GoE V City” Campaign and make a pledge to support the
October 19, 2021 - Page 1 of 150
transition to electric transportation options in our community.
2.D R B / P E C Update (5 min.)
2.1.D RB / P E C Update
Presenter(s): J onathan Spence, Planning Manager
3.Information Update
3.1.Future Council Meeting Topics
3.2.Art in Public Places September 13, 2021 Minutes
3.3.V LMD A C September Meeting Minutes
4.Matters from Mayor, Council and Committee Reports (10 min.)
5.Executive Session
5.1.Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b)(e) - to receive
legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop
a negotiating strategy and instruct negotiators, regarding a) First
Amendment to Solaris Development Agreement, between the Town and
Crossroads East One, L L C, dated September 1, 2020; and b) Residences
at Main Vail Development Agreement between the Town of Vail and Triumph
Development
60 min.
Presenter(s): Matt Mire, Town Attorney
6.Recess
6.1.Recess 5:00 pm (estimate)
Meeting agendas and materials can be accessed prior to meeting day on the Town of Vail website
www.vailgov.com. All town c ounc il meetings will be streamed live by High Five Acc ess Media and available for
public viewing as the meeting is happening. The meeting videos are also posted to High Five A cc ess Media
website the week following meeting day, www.highfivemedia.org.
Please c all 970-479-2136 for additional information. S ign language interpretation is available upon request with 48
hour notification dial 711.
October 19, 2021 - Page 2 of 150
VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO
I T E M /T O P I C: A rt in Public Places Update
P RE S E NT E R(S ): Molly Eppard, Art in P ublic P laces Coordinator
AC T IO N RE Q UE S T E D O F C O UNC I L: I nformation only. No action requested.
B AC K G RO UND:
The purpose of this item is to update Town Council on:
Completed projects from summer 2021
The potential donation of works from the collection of Vicki and Kent L ogan
S trategic Plan update
Ford P ark Art Space
The F ifteenth A nnual Vail W interfest
AT TAC H ME N TS:
Description
Memo
Update
October 19, 2021 - Page 3 of 150
To: Town Council
From: Molly Eppard, Art in Public Places Coordinator,
Art in Public Places Board
Date: 10/19/21
Subject: Art in Public Places Update
I. ITEM/TOPIC
Informational update on the Town of Vail’s Art in Public Places collection, installations,
and programs.
II. PURPOSE
The purpose of this item is to update Town Council on:
• Completed projects from Summer 2021,
• The potential donation of works from the collection of Vicki and Kent Logan,
• Strategic Plan update,
• Ford Park Art Space, and
• The Fifteenth Annual Vail Winterfest
• Recent Press Links:
https://www.hautelivingsf.com/2021/09/04/artsy-slopes-this-ski-towns-art-
museum-has-no-
walls/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=artsy-slopes-
this-ski-towns-art-museum-has-no-walls
III. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL
Provide any feedback on the materials as presented.
October 19, 2021 - Page 4 of 150
PRESENTATION BY
Molly Eppard, AIPP Coordinator Art in Public Places
October 19, 2021
Update
AIPP Board Members:
Kathy Langenwalter, Susanne Graf, Tracy Gordon, Courtney St. John,
Lindsea Stowe
October 19, 2021 - Page 5 of 150
Town of Vail Art in Public Places
Collection, Installations, and Programs
Summer 2021:
•Ben Roth -Stephens Park Art
•Ladies Fancywork Society –Ford Park Playground
•Olive Moya –Vail Transportation Center Murals
•Pedro Barrios & Jaime Molina –Dobson Ice Arena
Ventilation Stack Murals
•Floyd Elzinga –Golf & Nordic Clubhouse sculpture
•Relocation of Frederick Prescott’s Lion sculpture
Donation of Sculptures from the Collection of Vicki &
Kent Logan
AIPP Strategic Plan Update 2022
Ford Park Art Space
15th Annual Vail Winterfest -Opening December 19th
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 6 of 150
Ben Roth Kneehigh to a Grasshopper
Stephens Park Installation May 2021
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Twenty verdant horsetail grass plants
created in steel are thoughtfully installed
throughout the playground area.
Our goal for the playground was a
supersized riparian environment. As kids
climb the stump and look up at the
horsetail grass they get the perspective of
a riverbank’s smaller creatures. To
accomplish this effect, I had to build the
horsetail grass to be strong yet organic
and growing. It was fun to rotate each reed
as we put them together to shape the
negative (blue sky) space around them.
-Ben Roth
Stephens Park is the tenth playground
built by the Town of Vail Design Team in
collaboration with an artist to create a
unique play environment.
October 19, 2021 - Page 7 of 150
Ladies Fancywork Society The Hatchery
Relocated to Ford Park Playground
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Summer 2020 at Vail Public Library
Summer 2021 at Ford Park Playground
October 19, 2021 - Page 8 of 150
Summer 2021 Public Art Murals
at the Vail Village Transportation Center -Spaces Prior to Murals
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 9 of 150
Summer 2021 Public Art Murals
Olive Moya’s Mrs. Charles in the Sun
at the Vail Village Transportation Center
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Photographs from the late 1960’s / early 1970’s sourced from the
Colorado Snowsports Museum
October 19, 2021 - Page 10 of 150
Summer 2021 Public Art Murals
Olive Moya at the Vail Village Transportation Center
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 11 of 150
Summer 2021 Public Art Murals at Dobson Ice Arena
Ventilation Stacks Prior to Murals
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 12 of 150
Summer 2021 Public Art Murals
Pedro Barrios & Jaime Molina’s Kindred
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 13 of 150
Summer 2021 Public Art Murals
Pedro Barrios & Jaime Molina’s Kindred
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 14 of 150
Floyd Elzinga’s Pine Cone
at the Vail Golf and Nordic Clubhouse
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 15 of 150
Frederick Prescott’s Lion
Relocated West of the Lionshead Welcome Center
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 16 of 150
Recent Press about the Town of Vail’s Art in Public Places Collection
Town o Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 17 of 150
Recent Press about the Town of Vail’s Art in Public Places Collection
Town o Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 18 of 150
Art in Public Places in the Vail Community
Donation of work from the collection of Vicki and Kent Logan
Town o Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Donated work by conceptual artist Lawrence Weiner installed in Summer 2018.
It was prominently featured in the New York Times on December 24, 2018.
October 19, 2021 - Page 19 of 150
Art in Public Places in the Vail Community
Potential donation of works from the collection of Vicki and Kent Logan
Town o Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Jason Middlebrook
We are all Building Nests, 2015
October 19, 2021 - Page 20 of 150
Art in Public Places in the Vail Community
Potential donation of works from the collection of Vicki and Kent Logan
Town o Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Brad Kahlahmer Waqui Totem USA , 2008Nathan Mabry Two Vessels (Unpacked), 2013
October 19, 2021 - Page 21 of 150
Art in Public Places 2001 Strategic Plan Update
•Update the existing 2001 Art in Public Places Strategic Plan
to align with the Town of Vail’s vision “to be a premier
international destination resort community.”
•Focus on a 10-year plan to update and elevate the AIPP
mission, vision, approval process of donations to collection,
commissioned works, temporary installations, Cultural
Heritage Committee initiatives, public art in capital projects
and private developments.
•Encompass the overall cultural goals and structure for the
use of the Ford Park Art Studio Space.
•Vision development, research, and roadmap to these goals
will be implemented by consulting experts for municipal art
plans.
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 22 of 150
Ford Park Art Space Update
Further Design Development with Harry Teague Architects
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Purpose of a dedicated Art Space:
•Visiting artist working studio
•Gallery & exhibition space
•Workshop & instructional space
•Lecture & talk space
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 23 of 150
Fifteenth Annual Vail Winterfest Sponsored with Doe Browning
Ice and Light Installation
A collaboration between Olive Moya and Paul Wertin
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 24 of 150
Fifteenth Annual Vail Winterfest -Sponsored with Doe Browning
Lantern Display & Workshops
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
October 19, 2021 - Page 25 of 150
Thank you
October 19, 2021 - Page 26 of 150
VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO
I T E M /T O P I C: West Vail Master Plan Update - P resentation & Discussion
P RE S E NT E R(S ): Matt Gennett, Community Development Director
AC T IO N RE Q UE S T E D O F C O UNC I L: To view the presentation and provide feedback.
B AC K G RO UND: After four presentations with discussion and deliberations, on October 11,
2021, the P E C voted 6-0 (P ratt absent) to forward a recommendation of approval of the West Vail
Master Plan with one condition of approval. T he condition of approval is “that the proposed
modifications agreed to by the P E C be incorporated into the final draft of the plan upon adoption”.
The consultant team and staff are now working on incorporating the P E C’s proposed modifications
into the final draft for Council’s consideration on November 2, 2021.
AT TAC H ME N TS:
Description
Staff Memorandum
Presentation
October 19, 2021 - Page 27 of 150
To: Vail Town Council
From: Matt Gennett, Community Development Director
Date: October 19, 2021
Subject: West Vail Master Plan Update – Presentation and Discussion
I. INTRODUCTION
The West Vail Master Plan describes how the neighborhood may best transform over the
coming years. Conversations with the community and analysis of on the ground conditions
turned into a vision for what West Vail could and should be. The plan tells the story of that
vision, breaks it down into discrete goals, and offers a set of recommendations and
strategies on how to get there. As a practical planning tool, the plan will serve as a guide
for the Town of Vail as it considers housing policy, zoning, and future land use changes
along with upgrades to the transportation infrastructure.
The plan’s strategies and recommendations are informed by a robust public engagement
process conducted over the course of fifteen months (Spring 2020 – Summer 2021). An
Advisory Committee comprised of a cross-section of West Vail residents and business
owners was formed early in the process and met eight times to help steer the direction of
the plan. The project team also held public workshops on each of the major topic areas to
gather additional public comments. To complement insights gained from this process, this
plan draws on economic and demographic data, an analysis of current transportation and
traffic data, and a review of the existing land use plan and zoning regulations with
consideration of their implications.
To support desired changes in West Vail, the recommendations in this plan are intended
to be both inspiring and attainable. For example, the plan’s recommendations for
redeveloping the commercial area consider the financial incentives for property owners to
update or redevelop their properties. Some of the recommendations in the plan can be
achieved in the short-term, while others will require sustained collaboration and effort over
time. Importantly, this plan seeks to build upon West Vail’s past successes, retaining
policies and infrastructure that serve the community.
The West Vail Master Plan builds on the work of other plans adopted in Vail, including the
Vail 2020 Strategic Action Plan (2006), the Vail Town Council Action Plan 2018-20, the
Vail Land Use Plan (2009), Vail Housing 2027, the Vail Economic Development Strategic
Plan, the Chamonix Master Plan, the Vail Transportation Master Plan, the Vail Civic Area
October 19, 2021 - Page 28 of 150
Town of Vail Page 2
Plan (2019), the Vail Open Lands Plan (2018), and the Environmental Sustainability
Strategic Plan. These plans reflect the Town’s goals to foster a year-round community
and economy that prioritizes environmental sustainability and contains housing
opportunities for residents of varying income levels. The recommendations of the West
Vail Master Plan reflect and complement these Town-wide goals.
II. BACKGROUND
The creation and adoption of a master plan for West Vail was a Town Council 2018-2020
Action Plan goal. This master plan is in keeping with the council’s intentions around
thorough community engagement, sustainable best practices for future development,
identification of housing opportunities, and fostering economic development to create
vibrancy. The plan also addresses the many nonconforming uses and structures in West
Vail and provides policy options to guide future development decisions in West Vail.
The project team presented the draft plan to Council during their May 4 meeting and to the
PEC on May 10. On June 22, the project team presented the draft plan to the Advisory
Committee during their last meeting and received support for the recommendations
detailed in the plan. The cumulative feedback was incorporated into the draft and presented
to the public during an interactive Zoom webinar on July 13 with participation from 35-40
members of the public.
On August 9, 2021, the PEC was presented with the first two major topic areas, the West
Vail Center (commercial area) and Housing. The item was tabled to August 23 to continue
the presentation.
On August 23, 2021, the PEC tabled this item to September 13 without presentation or
discussion.
On September 13, 2021, staff and the consultant team provided the PEC with a
presentation that responded to the PEC’s comments and questions from August 9, and
included the third major topic area, Transportation. The item was tabled to September 27
after discussion and direction provided.
On September 27, 2021, staff and consultant team provided a detailed description of a
recommendation of approval with seven conditions addressing PEC’s suggested
modifications to the plan for their consideration. PEC directed staff to account for all
suggested modifications to the plan in a redlined/tracked changes version of the draft and
tabled the item to October 11.
On October 11, 2021, the PEC voted 6-0 (Pratt absent) to forward a recommendation of
approval of the West Vail Master Plan with one condition of approval. The condition of
approval is “that the proposed modifications agreed to by the PEC be incorporated into the
final draft of the plan upon adoption”. The consultant team and staff are now working on
incorporating the PEC’s proposed modifications into the final draft for Council’s
consideration on November 2, 2021.
October 19, 2021 - Page 29 of 150
Town of Vail Page 3
III. STUDY AREA
The study area is approximately 262 acres and bordered by West Gore Creek Drive to the
south, Cortina Lane, and Garmisch Drive to the north, Buffehr Creek Road to the east and
Arosa Drive to the west. The project area was determined by Town staff, the consultant
team, and Council. The plan also takes into consideration the connections from West Vail
to local destinations outside of the project area and West Vail’s role within the Town.
Study Area
IV. CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEW
The West Vail Master Plan is intended to define a vision for what this neighborhood can be
and to provide a framework or a path forward for how Vail can optimize West Vail for
residents and visitors. The opportunity for a master plan that focuses on the West Vail
commercial and residential neighborhoods has been an identified need for many years.
Adoption of a Master Plan
The adoption of an amendment or update to a master plan needs to be in concert with the
Town of Vail’s Comprehensive Master Plan. The adopted master plan shall support,
strengthen, and further the development objectives of the town. To ensure consistency with
these objectives, the following factors for consideration are applied:
October 19, 2021 - Page 30 of 150
Town of Vail Page 4
1) How conditions have changed since the original plan was adopted.
Staff finds that conditions have changed in the following manner since the adoption of the
Vail Land Use Plan on November 18, 1986 and last amended on November 5, 2019 with
the adoption of the Civic Area Plan:
o Significant population growth in Vail and in Eagle County
o A shortage of available residential housing
o Large increases in year-round visitation
o On-going redevelopment in Vail
2) How is the original plan in error?
Staff does not find that the Vail Land Use Plan is in error. To remain relevant and consistent
with the changing conditions and goals of the community, the plan needs to be updated on
a consistent basis, including this type of subarea master plan adoption.
The existing Future Land Use Map has the residential neighborhoods of West Vail
designated as Low and Medium Density Residential. The recommendations for rezoning
these areas in the West Vail Master Plan conform with what has been contemplated in the
existing Vail Land Use Plan.
The commercial area known as West Vail Center in the proposed master plan is designated
as Community Commercial in the existing Future Land Use Map of the Vail Land Use Plan.
The Community Commercial designation envisions the addition of residential density and
a mixed-use environment much like the scenarios included in the West Vail Center chapter
of the proposed master plan.
3) How the addition, deletion, or change to the Vail Land Use Plan is in concert with
the plan in general.
As stated above, Staff finds that the identified purpose and goals of the Civic Area Plan are
consistent with the stated goal and objectives of the Vail Land Use Plan.
V. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL
Staff asks Council to review the presentation and provide feedback during the meeting.
The consultant team and staff will incorporate Council’s input into the final draft of the West
Vail Master Plan for Council’s consideration for adoption via resolution at their November
2, 2021 regular meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
West Vail Master Plan Presentation
October 19, 2021 - Page 31 of 150
Town Council
West Vail Master Plan
Presentation
October 19, 2021
October 19, 2021 - Page 32 of 150
Welcome!
Agenda:
•Walk-through of the major pieces of the plan
•Review key items/concerns for next adoption meeting
Plan OverviewOctober 19, 2021 - Page 33 of 150
About the Master Plan
What issues does this plan address?
•Outdated commercial area
•Existing aging housing stock
•Need for additional pedestrian
and biking connections, upgrades
to North Frontage Road
•Limitations of current zoning
Plan OverviewOctober 19, 2021 - Page 34 of 150
The Team
•Four Colorado-based firms
with combined expertise in
public engagement, zoning
and land use, transportation
planning, community design
and character, and economic
and housing analysis
Plan OverviewOctober 19, 2021 - Page 35 of 150
Study Area
Plan Overview
•Commercial area/ West Vail Center
•Residential areas
•Transportation network
October 19, 2021 - Page 36 of 150
The Process
•Phase 1: Background research and analysis; assessment
of community priorities
•Phase 2:Presentation of draft vision statements, goals,
and plan concepts at virtual workshops (Transportation,
Housing, Commercial Area)
•Phase 3: Drafting the Plan, presentations to Town
Council and Planning & Environmental Commission
•Consultation with Advisory Committee throughout
•4 PEC Meetings with recommendation for adoption
Plan OverviewOctober 19, 2021 - Page 37 of 150
The Plan Evolution
•How many grocery stores does West Vail need? What types?
•How many stories belong in the commercial area, particularly along the
Frontage Road?
•How can new road designs work in all seasons?
•What types of housing belong in West Vail? What levels of housing
density are appropriate?
•How can the Town get this done? (Implementation pathways)
Plan OverviewOctober 19, 2021 - Page 38 of 150
A Vision for West Vail
“The future West Vail is a complete neighborhood with increased
housing options for year-round residents, streets that support
multiple modes of transportation, and a vibrant, walkable center
where residents and visitors can shop at local businesses and gather as
a community. Though just minutes from a world-class resort, West
Vail retains a familiar, neighborly feel.”
Plan OverviewOctober 19, 2021 - Page 39 of 150
West Vail Center
October 19, 2021 - Page 40 of 150
West Vail Center EXISTING CONDITIONSOctober 19, 2021 - Page 41 of 150
West Vail Center WHY CHANGE?
•Economic competitiveness
•Strip style commercial doesn’t meet Vail Land Use Plan vision
•Aesthetically lacks sense of place
•Primarily car-oriented
•Vail lacks developable land, yet demands more housing and commercial
October 19, 2021 - Page 42 of 150
West Vail Center MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
•Low Real Estate Supply
•Businesses going down valley
•Highway Visibility/Location
•Only convenience stop between Summit County and Eagle-Vail
•Healthy Commercial Rents
•Healthy Retail Sales
•Property Ownership
•Limited number of parcels
October 19, 2021 - Page 43 of 150
Vision: West Vail Center
“The reimagined ‘West Vail Center’ is the center of economic and social life in West Vail. It’s a
place to meet a friend for a cup of coffee, conveniently pick up groceries and other essentials,
and access transit connections to the rest of the town and valley. As the western gateway to
the Town of Vail, the commercial center is aesthetically pleasing and inviting, with new and
upgraded buildings that reflect the neighborhood’s scale and mountain setting while
providing much-needed resident housing. The area’s new pattern of development is oriented
to pedestrians, accommodating to bicyclists, and accessible by both car and transit. Vibrant,
active businesses in the commercial area serve both locals and visitors, supporting and
meeting the needs of West Vail’s year-round community.”
West Vail CenterOctober 19, 2021 - Page 44 of 150
Summary of Goals
1.Town works collaboratively to improve economic vibrancy and provide housing
2.Expand housing opportunities in West Vail Center
3.Ensure comfortable and efficient access for people using all transportation modes
4.Retain essential businesses that serve Vail’s year-round community
5.Attract new businesses that support social life (e.g. coffee shops)
6.Create an inviting, human-scaled environment within West Vail Center
7.Maintain an aesthetic that is distinctive and memorable, yet suits West Vail’s mountain
environment
8.Sustainability is woven into all aspects of the physical design and program of West Vail
Center.West Vail CenterOctober 19, 2021 - Page 45 of 150
West Vail Center FRAMEWORKOctober 19, 2021 - Page 46 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 1October 19, 2021 - Page 47 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 1October 19, 2021 - Page 48 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 1October 19, 2021 - Page 49 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 2October 19, 2021 - Page 50 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 2October 19, 2021 - Page 51 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 2 PHASINGOctober 19, 2021 - Page 52 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 2 PHASINGOctober 19, 2021 - Page 53 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 2 PHASINGOctober 19, 2021 - Page 54 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 2 PHASINGOctober 19, 2021 - Page 55 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 2 PHASINGOctober 19, 2021 - Page 56 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 3October 19, 2021 - Page 57 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 3October 19, 2021 - Page 58 of 150
West Vail Center SCENARIO 3October 19, 2021 - Page 59 of 150
West Vail Center PROS AND CONS
1 –QUICK WINS 2 –PARCEL-BY -PARCEL 3 –MAIN STREET
October 19, 2021 - Page 60 of 150
Implementation
•Pathways: Special Development District or Rezoning
•Led by property owners in partnership with Town
•Market-rate housing
•Create value to fund redevelopment and parking costs
•Provide incentive to property owners
•Town Partnership
•Assist with paying for a portion of structured parking
•Consider a special district and/or TIF
West Vail CenterOctober 19, 2021 - Page 61 of 150
Feasibility Evaluation
•Planning level proforma of Scenarios 2 and 3
•Subtracting estimated costs from development value = Residual Land Value
•Assuming half of housing units are deed restricted, parking below ground, rents in line with current rates
•Aiming for residual land value greater than $120 per square foot (2018 sale of West Vail Mall) to show financial feasibility
•Scenario 2 results in Residual Land Value of $131 per square foot
•Scenario 3 results in Residual Land Value of $192 per square foot
•Given timing of costs, would likely require public financing mechanism to minimize risk for the developer
West Vail CenterOctober 19, 2021 - Page 62 of 150
What could the mix of businesses in West Vail Center look like?
West Vail CenterOctober 19, 2021 - Page 63 of 150
Zoning Recommendations: Scenario 1 Updates to CC3
West Vail Center
1
•Develop new parking schedule
•Expand allowed housing types
•Revise landscaping requirements to
align with scenario
•Develop new mix of allowed,
conditional, and prohibited uses
October 19, 2021 - Page 64 of 150
Design and Land Use Principles –Scenarios 2 and 3
Scen. 2
Scen. 3
•Develop new mix of
allowed, conditional, and
prohibited uses
•Increase max building
heights strategically,
maximizing protection of
viewsheds
•Develop new parking
schedule
•Develop design guidelines
that foster a pedestrian-
friendly environment
West Vail Center
•Increase max site
coverage
•Expand allowed
housing types and
density
•Reduce minimum
setback
requirements
•Restrict inactive
uses to upper floors
•Revise landscaping
requirements to
align with scenarios
October 19, 2021 - Page 65 of 150
Housing
October 19, 2021 - Page 66 of 150
Why Change?
•Non-conformities
•Existing aging housing stock
•Opportunity in West Vail Center
•Market forces
•Benefits of resident housing
HousingOctober 19, 2021 - Page 67 of 150
Vision: Housing
“West Vail will remain the heart of resident-occupied housing in Vail. Through
updates to zoning regulations, resident-first housing policies, and the
construction of new housing in West Vail Center, residents can find quality
places to live in the West Vail neighborhood. New and upgraded units will reflect
the scale and varied character of West Vail’s existing housing stock.”
HousingOctober 19, 2021 - Page 68 of 150
Summary of Goals
1.Increase deed-restricted homes
2.Support residents’ efforts to improve their properties
3.New construction and updates reflect mountain environment and neighborhood
character
4.Create a continuum of housing options to accommodate residents through all phases
and stages of life
5.Ensure 90 percent of West Vail housing units are within a five-minute walk of a
transit stop
6.Maintain a managed level of short-term rental units
HousingOctober 19, 2021 - Page 69 of 150
Study Area
Upper
Chamonix
Geneva
Lower
Chamonix
October 19, 2021 - Page 70 of 150
Zoning Recommendations
1.New Zoning District –West Vail
Multiple-Family 1
•Minimum density 9 du/buildable acre where 1
unit is deed restricted
•Up to 18 du/buildable acre if 50% of additional
units are deed-restricted (Medium Density
Multiple-Family)
•No short-term rentals on additional units when
redeveloped
•Lots at greater than 18 units/buildable acre
would be allowed to redevelop to existing unit
counts if comply with deed restrictions and
other dimensional requirements Housing
2.New Zoning District –West Vail
Multiple-Family 2
•Minimum density 6 du/buildable acre where 1
unit is deed restricted
•Up to 12 du/buildable acre if 50% of additional
units are deed-restricted (Medium Density
Multiple-Family)
•No short-term rentals on additional units when
redeveloped
•Lots at greater than 12 units/buildable acre
would be allowed to redevelop to existing unit
counts if comply with deed restrictions and
other dimensional requirements
October 19, 2021 - Page 71 of 150
Study Area
October 19, 2021 - Page 72 of 150
Zoning Recommendations Summary
Upper Chamonix Lower Chamonix Geneva/Alpine
Zoning Designation West Vail Multiple-Family
1
West Vail Multiple-Family
1
West Vail Multiple-
Family 2
Lots 27 18 30
Existing Unit Count 151 65 60
Short-term Rental Licenses 12 7 6
Deed-restricted Units (2019)11 2 1
Average Year of Multi-Family construction 1972 1970 1972
Units Allowed Under Current Zoning 54 23 43
Allowed Units –Minimum Density 102 51 52
Allowed Units –Maximum Density 226 106 120
Resulting Deed Restrictions –Minimum Density 31 18 30
Resulting Deed Restrictions –Minimum Density 93 45 64
Primary Unit Type
Small, medium-size multi-
family, townhouses at
maximum
Small, medium-size multi-
family, townhouses at
maximum
Duplexes, triplexes,
small to medium multi-
family at maximumOctober 19, 2021 - Page 73 of 150
Code Recommendations
•Support higher density residential development without exceeding height limits
through greater flexibility around site coverage and GRFA requirements in new
zone districts
•Study the reduction of required parking spaces in areas close to bus stops and/or
West Vail Center. Study should include review of impacts to emergency services
access.
•Establish maximum width of parking access as two vehicles, with creativity in
design to support allowed density and exceptions for aesthetic buffer and
pedestrian-safe design.
HousingOctober 19, 2021 - Page 74 of 150
Policies & Programs Recommendations
•Incentives or credit programs for property improvements on deed-
restricted units
•Additional short-term rental regulations (i.e., neighborhood/block caps,
good-neighbor regulations, licensing fee increases)
•Additional flexibility and fee refunds for accessory dwelling units
•Grow Vail INDEED
•Fee refunds for development of deed-restricted units in Vail consistent
with the existing system
•Reducing the development review requirements for West Vail HousingOctober 19, 2021 - Page 75 of 150
Transportation & Mobility
October 19, 2021 - Page 76 of 150
Vision: Transportation & Mobility
“This Plan aims to enhance connectivity for people walking, biking, taking transit,
and driving in and around West Vail. The reimagined transportation network will
integrate a variety of transportation modes, making multimodal trips through
West Vail comfortable and convenient. A multimodal transit hub located in the
commercial core will offer easy connections to the rest of the valley, improving
the experience of travel within the neighborhood.”
Transportation & MobilityOctober 19, 2021 - Page 77 of 150
Goals
1.Biking and walking trips are comfortable and convenient.
2.Driving and parking is efficient and supportive of new technologies.
Emergency access remains efficient through West Vail.
3.The North Frontage Road is pedestrian friendly and support economic
vitality of the West Vail Center.
4.Transit is user friendly and connects with key destinations.
5.Users are informed on transportation options through programs and
policies.
Transportation & MobilityOctober 19, 2021 - Page 78 of 150
Major Concepts
•Phased recommendations
•Pilot projects
•Shovel-ready ideas that can be
implemented in the next few
years
•Infrastructure, programs, and
policies
Transportation & MobilityOctober 19, 2021 - Page 79 of 150
Traffic Calming
Lighting
Signage
Painted 4’ shoulder
Transportation & MobilityOctober 19, 2021 - Page 80 of 150
West Vail Center Access and Circulation
•Access management
•North Frontage road diet
•Path crossings at driveways
•During design phase: Further study of potential growth in
trips to West Vail Center, snow removal, emergency access
Transportation & MobilityOctober 19, 2021 - Page 81 of 150
Crossing Enhancements
•At roundabouts
•Between bus stops at North
Frontage Road
•At Buffehr Creek/North
Frontage Road
•At driveway access points
•Investigate I-70 grade-
separated crossing
Transportation & MobilityOctober 19, 2021 - Page 82 of 150
Increase Transit Ridership
•Mobility Hub
•Service planning
•First and last mile
•Transportation
Demand
Management
•Improve connections
to ECO Transit
Transportation & MobilityOctober 19, 2021 - Page 83 of 150
Transportation Programs & Policies
•Maintenance
•Transportation Demand Management
•Electric Vehicles
•Technology
•Education
•Shared parking policy
•Pedestrian-scale lighting
•Bike share
•Data collection
•Wayfinding signage
Transportation & MobilityOctober 19, 2021 - Page 84 of 150
Discussion
October 19, 2021 - Page 85 of 150
Funding and Financing
Tool Scenario 1
Annual Revenue
Scenario 2
Financing
Capacity
Scenario 3
Financing Capacity
Business
Improvement
District (BID)
•$200,000-
$300,000/yr.
•5.000 mills, $0.50-
$1.00/sqft
•N/A •N/A
Tax Increment
Financing (TIF)
•N/A •$10-13 million •$11-14 million
Special District
(30 mills residential
10 mills comm.)
•N/A •$10 million •$13 million
West Vail CenterOctober 19, 2021 - Page 86 of 150
West Vail Center IMPLEMENTATION COMPARISONOctober 19, 2021 - Page 87 of 150
VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO
I T E M /T O P I C: Review "GoE V City" Program and pledge to implement strategies to reduce
transportation related emissions (Resolution No. 48, S eries of 2021)
P RE S E NT E R(S ): K risten Bertuglia, Director of Environmental S ustainability and Stefan
J ohnson, Transportation Program Manager, Clean E nergy E conomy for the Region (C L E E R)
AC T IO N RE Q UE S T E D O F C O UNC I L: I nformational P resentation with action on Resolution
No. 48, Series 2021 during evening meeting.
B AC K G RO UND: The GoE V Coalition invited the Town of Vail to become a member of the
“GoE V City” Campaign and make a pledge to support the transition to electric transportation
options in our community.
AT TAC H ME N TS:
Description
Resolution No. 48, Series of 2021 - GoE V City Resolution Memo
updated GoE V City Presentation (2021)- Town of Vail
October 19, 2021 - Page 88 of 150
To: Vail Town Council
From: Environmental Sustainability Department
Date: October 19, 2021
Subject: Resolution No. 48, Series of 2021, A Resolution to declare the Town of Vail a “GoEV
City” and pledge to implement strategies to reduce transportation related emissions.
I. Purpose
The purpose of this memorandum and presentation is to present for adoption Resolution No. 48,
Series of 2021, to become a Go Electric Vehicle (GoEV) City and pledge to support programs,
policies, incentives and regulatory approaches to transition 100% of all vehicles within the Town
of Vail to zero emissions by 2050.
II. Background
The GoEV Coalition invited the Town of Vail to become a member of the “GoEV City” Campaign
and make a pledge to support the transition to electric transportation options in our community.
Transportation is now the largest source of climate-changing pollution in Colorado and Eagle
County. It is the second largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in Vail, behind commercial
buildings.
The Town of Vail adopted the 2016 Climate Action Plan for the Eagle County Community
January 2017 and the 2020 Climate Action Plan update on April 20, 2021. The plan
recommends climate action goals and strategies by sector to achieve greenhouse gas emission
reduction targets of 25% by 2025, 50% by 2030 and 80% by 2050. Electrification of fleets and
vehicles is one strategy that can significantly contribute progress towards these climate goals.
Transitioning to electric vehicles (EVs) and other zero emissions vehicles will reduce pollution
and save users money because EVs are cheaper to fuel and maintain than gasoline or diesel
vehicles. The GoEV Cities and Counties campaign is a joint effort of the Southwest Energy
Efficiency Project (“SWEEP”), the Clean Energy Economy for the Region (“CLEER”), the
Colorado Public Interest Research Group (“CoPIRG”), Conservation Colorado, and the Sierra
Club. The effort is modeled after the Ready for 100 campaign, which has led more than 75 local
governments in the U.S. to committing themselves to obtaining 100 percent renewable energy
no later than 2050.
In January of 2018, the state of Colorado released Colorado’s Electric Vehicle Plan, which sets
the goal of one million EVs on the road by 2030. Achieving this goal is key to meeting state
targets for carbon emissions reductions and improving negative air quality impacts which are on
the rise as the state continues to see rapid growth in population and infrastructure. Meeting
October 19, 2021 - Page 89 of 150
Town of Vail Page 2
these goals will require the support of Colorado cities to meet the challenge. Currently there are
eight Colorado communities who have adopted GoEV City Resolutions including Boulder
County, City and County of Denver, Town of Avon, City of Boulder, Summit County, City of
Golden, City of Fort Collins and City of Longmont.
Eagle County currently has a 2% penetration rate of electric vehicles on the road, with 749
registered electric vehicles out of 38,189 total registered vehicles. The Climate Action Plan 2020
Update includes a goal of at least a 2% increase in electric penetration per year as a
percentage of all registered vehicles in Eagle County.
Greenhouse Gas Inventories for Reference
Below are the most recent greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories for the State of Colorado, Eagle
County and Town of Vail (which is community wide). Transportation related emissions make up
25% of total emissions in the State, 36% of total emissions in Eagle County, and 31% of total
emissions in Vail.
2020 State of Colorado GHG Inventory 2017 Eagle County GHG Inventory- emissions by sector
2018 Town of Vail GHG Inventory – emissions by sector
October 19, 2021 - Page 90 of 150
Town of Vail Page 3
Progress to Date
At the direction of the Vail Town Council, Vail began purchasing 100% renewable electricity
through Holy Cross Energy’s Renewable Energy Purchase Program (PuRE) in July 2019.
Therefore, all EV charging infrastructure in Vail is providing renewable solar energy, reducing
the related climate impacts.
The Town has been awarded state and federal funding for installation of EV charging
infrastructure and electrification of the bus fleet. To date the Town has installed 12 multi-port
Level 2 electric vehicle charging stations ($37,560), four DC Fast Charging stations ($380,000),
infrastructure improvements and charging stations at Public Works and the Vail Transportation
Center to support charging four battery electric buses currently servicing the in-town bus route
($656,610). Town of Vail has also been awarded $2,320,276 from Colorado Department of
Transportation (CDOT) through the Volkswagon settlement fund for four of six additional electric
buses scheduled to be delivered in 2023.
The Town is also exploring micro-mobility options that encourage alternative forms of
transportation, including implementation of a regional electric bike share program and
supporting other programs to increase alternative commuting options such as the eBikes for
Essentials program, which provided seven essential workers with electric bikes to use for
commuting. The Town also facilitates the County-wide Sole Power Green Commuting
Challenge, which is in its 11th year and has had over 2,000 participants log nearly 400,000 miles
of human powered commuting.
Currently, Holy Cross Energy offers the Charge at Home program, which provides up to two free
Level 2 charging stations to Holy Cross members who purchase an Electric Vehicle.
Town of Vail is off to a strong start as it begins to transition to electric and zero emissions
vehicles. As a local and global leader in sustainability, it is critical to demonstrate leadership in
action. Pledging to become a GoEV City demonstrates Vail’s commitment to achieving climate
goals and reducing its climate impacts in the transportation sector.
III. Next Steps: Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan
Staff will work across departments to develop an electric vehicle (EV) Readiness Plan with
implementation strategies in the coming months. An EV Readiness Plan provides a framework
to guide the transition of electrifying vehicles within town operations and in the community. An
EV Readiness plans includes goals and strategies and delineates charging infrastructure
improvements at public facilities, incentive programs (i.e. rebates), and policy changes to
facilitate charging infrastructure on private property. The Plan will include goals to transition
Vail’s fleet and transit buses to 100% electric or zero emissions vehicles by 2050. In addition,
the Town of Vail will work with the Vail community and Holy Cross Energy on programs, and
policies to transition 100% of all vehicles within the town to zero emissions by 2050.
IV. Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Vail Town Council adopt Resolution No.48, Series of 2021.
V. Attachments
October 19, 2021 - Page 91 of 150
Town of Vail Page 4
A. Resolution No.48, Series of 2021
October 19, 2021 - Page 92 of 150
October 19, 2021 - Page 93 of 150
Electric transportation is critical to achieving
Colorado’s ambitious climate goals.
Transportation is the #1 source
of GHGs in Colorado.
2030 Climate & EV Targets:
●940,000 EVs on the road (30,000 today)
●40% reduction in transportation GHGs
HB 1261 Targets: Emissions by Sector (2015-2030)
Transportation
With current policies
Conservation Colorado (2020)
50% GHG
reduction
26% GHG
reduction
October 19, 2021 - Page 94 of 150
GoEV City:
A Commitment to 100% Zero-Emission Transportation
1.Boulder County
2.City and County of Denver
3.Town of Avon
4.City of Boulder
5.Summit County
6.City of Golden
7.City of Fort Collins
8.City of Longmont
October 19, 2021 - Page 95 of 150
The idea: Local governments can drive change
•Ready for 100 Campaign has 325 local
governments committed to 100%
renewables (15 in CO).
•These local commitments shape public
understanding and drive broad change
•Colorado goal: 940,000 EVs by 2030
(31,000 EVs in CO today)
Ready for 100 in Colorado: Denver, Boulder, Pueblo,
Nederland, Longmont, Lafayette, Breckenridge, Aspen,
Pueblo County, Summit County, Frisco, Silverthorne,
Golden, Fort Collins, Durango.
October 19, 2021 - Page 96 of 150
The GoEV City Commitment
1.City commits to transition its own fleet to zero emission
vehicles.
2.City works with the local transit agency and school districts
to transition to zero emissions buses.
3.City works to transition taxis, Uber/Lyft and similar services
to zero emission vehicles.
4.City sets goals to transition all vehicles in the community to
zero emission vehicles.
October 19, 2021 - Page 97 of 150
Electrifying City Fleets
●Boulder County: All new sedans starting in 2020,
SUVs in 2025, & pickup trucks in 2030.
●Denver: 200 EVs in 2020, up to 850 by 2029
●City of Boulder: ‘EV First’ procurement policy
includes TCO (fuel, maintenance, social cost of
carbon)
●Golden: 100% zero-emission fleet by 2030.
●Fort Collins: All new light-duty purchases are EV by
2025. Currently 70 EVs in fleet of 1,200.
●New fleet evaluation opportunities with utilities,
DMCC, and others.
Boulder County EV Schedule
October 19, 2021 - Page 98 of 150
Electrify Buses: Transit & School Buses
●Town of Vail: 4 Electric Transit Buses, 100% by
2032
●Summit Stage: 3 electric transit buses. 2 more in
Breckenridge.
●Aspen School District: 4 Electric School Buses
on order
●Steamboat Springs School District: 5 Electric
School Buses on order
●GoEV cities advocate for state policy & work with
transit agencies & school districts to apply for
state & utility funding.
October 19, 2021 - Page 99 of 150
Electrify shared mobility services:
Taxis, TNCs, delivery, micromobility
●Lyft adds 200 EVs to their Colorado rental
fleet - working with CEO, Denver & Xcel on
charging infrastructure.
●eGo carshare electrifying vehicles.
Partnering with Denver & Mariposa
Affordable Housing.
●E-Vail Courier Pilot Program includes EVs
●Vail launched e-Bike for Essential Workers,
similar programs in Denver, Boulder, &
Durango.October 19, 2021 - Page 100 of 150
Electrify all vehicles in the community
●Boulder County: 30% EV by 2030, 100% by 2050.
●Denver: 15% by 2025, 30% by 2030, 100% by 2050.
●City of Boulder: 30% EV by 2030, 100% by 2050.
●Golden: 20% EV by 2030, 100% by 2050
●Fort Collins: 50% new vehicle sales by 2030.
●Summit County: 100% EV by 2050.
●Implementation Tools:
○EV-Ready Building Codes / Ordinances
○Public EV charging stations.
○EV Education & Awareness.
○Dealership Engagement
○Incentives and Perks
October 19, 2021 - Page 101 of 150
Local EV Plans and Roadmaps
Coming in 2021:
1.Longmont Equitable Carbon-Free
Transportation Roadmap
2.Colorado Springs EV Readiness Plan
3.Estes Park EV Infrastructure & Readiness
Plan
4.Pueblo County EV Readiness Plan
5.Durango EV Readiness Plan
6.Steamboat Springs EV Readiness Plan
7.Summit County EV Readiness Plan
8.Golden: Fleet Electrification Plan
Fort Collins EV
Readiness Roadmap
October 19, 2021 - Page 102 of 150
www.goevcity.org
Stefan Johnson, CLEER – sjohnson@cleanenergyeconomy.net
October 19, 2021 - Page 103 of 150
VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO
I T E M /T O P I C: D R B / P E C Update
P RE S E NT E R(S ): J onathan S pence, Planning Manager
AT TAC H ME N TS:
Description
October 6, 2021 D R B Meeting Results
October 11, 2021 P E C Meeting Results
October 19, 2021 - Page 104 of 150
D E S IG N R E V IE W B O AR D
October 6, 2021, 2:00 P M
Town Council C hambers
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
1.Call to Order
1.1.Register in advance for this webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/W N_bA K S68B E Rc2RR1kKiF N6qg
1.2.Attendance
Present: Doug Cahill, Peter Cope, J ohn Rediker, Kit Austin, Kathryn
Middleton
Absent: None
2.Main Agenda
2.1.D R B21-0406 - Vail Associates LL C
Final review of an exterior alteration (roof)
Address/Legal Description: 1160 Casolar Del Norte Drive Unit A/Lot 9,
Casolar Vail
Applicant: Vail Associates LLC, represented by J auquet Home Care
Planner: Greg Roy
1. The applicant shall obtain HOA approval for the proposed roofing
material prior to building permit submittal.
J ohn Rediker moved to approve with conditions and with the findings that the
application meets Sections 14-10-5 and 14-10-2. Kathryn Middleton
seconded the motion and it passed (5-0).
2.2.D R B21-0005.003 - Luther Residence
Final review of change to approved plans (railing & hot tub)
Address/Legal Description: 227 Bridge Street Units A & B/Lot B - D, Block
5B, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Charles Luther, represented by Shepherd Resources I nc. A I A
Planner: Greg Roy
J ohn Rediker moved to approve with the findings that the application meets
Section 14-10-2. Peter Cope seconded the motion and it passed (5-0).
3.Staff Approvals
3.1.D R B21-0349 - Breneisen Residence
Final review of an exterior alteration (window & door)
Address/Legal Description: 4132 Spruce W ay 2/Lot A, Block 9, Bighorn
October 19, 2021 - Page 105 of 150
Subdivision 3rd Addition
Applicant: J ere J . & I sa J . Breneisen, represented by Karl Breneisen
Planner: Greg Roy
3.2.D R B21-0367 - Brandess Enterprises L LC
Final review of an exterior alteration (antennas/remote radios)
Address/Legal Description: 2077 North Frontage Road West 39/Lot 39,
Buffehr Creek Resubdivision
Applicant: Brandess Enterprises L L C, represented by Smartlink Group
Planner: Greg Roy
3.3.D R B21-0385 - Town of Vail
Final review of an exterior alteration (cell antenna)
Address/Legal Description: 1265 North Frontage Road West, Lot 2, Timber
Ridge Subdivision
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Crown Castle
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.4.D R B21-0397 - Burnett Residence
Final review of an exterior alteration (driveway/landscaping)
Address/Legal Description: 1987 Circle Drive/Lot 26, Buffehr Creek
Resubdivision
Applicant: Amy G. Burnett Trust, represented by Nedbo Construction
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.5.D R B21-0400 - W hicker Residence
Final review of a tree removal
Address/Legal Description: 4344 Spruce W ay/Lot 6, Block 3, Bighorn
Subdivision 3rd Addition
Applicant: Lawrence & Susan W hicker, represented by Vail Valley Tree
Services
Planner: Greg Roy
3.6.D R B21-0402 - Vail Racquet Club Condominiums
Final review of a tree removal
Address/Legal Description: 4695 Meadow Drive/Vail Racquet Club
Condominiums - Clubhouse
Applicant: Vail Racquet Club Condominiums, represented Steve Loftus
Planner: Greg Roy
3.7.D R B21-0408 - Spyder/The North Face
Final review of a business sign
Address/Legal Description: 141 East Meadow Drive/Lot P & Tract C, Block
5D, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Solaris Commercial Owner L L C, represented by Todd
Architecture
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.8.D R B21-0409 - Christoffersen Trust
October 19, 2021 - Page 106 of 150
Final review of an exterior alteration (deck/roof/stair)
Address/Legal Description: 1390 Briar Patch Lane Unit 3/Lot G2 & G6,
Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing 2
Applicant: Ralph E. Christoffersen QP R Trust, represented by Martin Manley
Architects
Planner: Greg Roy
3.9.D R B21-0412 - Ostling Residence
Final review of a tree removal
Address/Legal Description: 706 Forest Road Unit A/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail
Village Filing 6
Applicant: Paul & Danita Ostling, represented by Old Growth Tree Service
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.10.D R B21-0413 - Alepatojero L LC
Final review of an exterior alteration (door)
Address/Legal Description: 701 W est Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail
Lionshead Filing 3
Applicant: Alepatojero L L C, represented by dowe-studio
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.11.D R B21-0414 - Chamonix Chalets
Final review of a tree removal
Address/Legal Description: 2480 Chamonix Lane/Lot 1, Block B, Vail Das
Schone Filing 1
Applicant: Chamonix Chalets, represented by Ceres Landcare
Planner: J amie Leaman-Miller
3.12.D R B21-0415 - E.V. Property Management Inc.
Final review of an exterior alteration (doors)
Address/Legal Description: 4560 Vail Racquet Club Drive 1-6/Vail Racquet
Club Condominiums
Applicant: E.V. Property Management I nc., represented by J eff Bercume
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.13.D R B21-0416 - Rymer Residence
Final review of an exterior alteration (windows)
Address/Legal Description: 2091 Zermatt Lane Unit C/Vail Commons
Residential Condominiums
Applicant: Todd & Michelle Rymer, represented by Renewal by Andersen
Planner: Greg Roy
3.14.D R B21-0417 - Kleid Residence
Final review of an exterior alteration (patio door)
Address/Legal Description: 4506 Spruce W ay Unit 18/Lot 8 & 9, Block 1,
Bighorn Subdivision 3rd Addition
Applicant: Susan Kleid, represented by Renewal by Andersen
Planner: Greg Roy
October 19, 2021 - Page 107 of 150
3.15.D R B21-0419 - Eagle Pointe Condominiums
Final review of an exterior alteration (reroof)
Address/Legal Description: 1500 Matterhorn Circle/Eagle Pointe
Condominiums
Applicant: Eagle Pointe Condominiums, represented by Capital Roofing &
Restoration
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.16.D R B21-0423 - Stancliffe Residence
Final review of a tree removal
Address/Legal Description: 1460 Buffehr Creek Road Unit D/Parcel D,
Crossview at Vail Subdivision
Applicant: Timothy & Linda Stancliffe, represented by Ceres Landcare
Planner: Greg Roy
3.17.D R B21-0424 - Villa Cortina
Final review of an exterior alteration (snowmelt boiler)
Address/Legal Description: 22 West Meadow Drive/Lot H, Vail Village Filing
2
Applicant: Villa Cortina, represented by Goulding Development Advisors
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.18.D R B21-0430 - Evans Residence
Final review of an exterior alteration (roof height)
Address/Legal Description: 4126 Columbine Drive Unit W /Lot 16, Bighorn
Subdivision
Applicant: Michele & Christopher Evans
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.19.D R B21-0434 - Compass at Solaris
Final review of a business sign
Address/Legal Description: 141 East Meadow Drive/Lot P & Tract C, Block
5D, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Solaris Commercial Owner, represented by Sign Design
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.20.D R B21-0439 - El Segundo
Final review of an exterior alteration (patio heaters)
Address/Legal Description: 223 Gore Creek Drive Unit B/Lot A, Block 5B,
Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Creekside Commercial Building LLC, represented by Rocky
Mountain Construction Group
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.21.D R B21-0445 - Kurz Residence
Final review of an exterior alteration (landscape wall)
Address/Legal Description: 2725 Bald Mountain Road Unit A/Lot 6, Block 2,
Vail Village Filing 13
October 19, 2021 - Page 108 of 150
Applicant: Ludwig Kurz
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.22.D R B19-0583.003 - Moore Residence
Final review of a change to approved plans (roof)
Address/Legal Description: 4214 Columbine W ay Unit 6/Bighorn Terrace
Applicant: Linda Moore, represented by Beth Levine Architect I nc.
Planner: J onathan Spence
3.23.D R B20-0563.002 - Knuepfer Residence
Final review of a change to approved plans (hot tub)
Address/Legal Description: 748 Potato Patch Drive Unit A/Lot 7, Vail Potato
Patch Filing 2
Applicant: David R. Knuepfer Qualified Personal Residence Trust,
represented by Berglund Architects
Planner: Greg Roy
3.24.D R B21-0060.001 - Ropp/Lupin Interests LL C Residence
Final review of a change to approved plans (landscaping)
Address/Legal Description: 3956 Lupine Drive W est/Lot 4, Block 2, Bighorn
Subdivision 1st Addition
Applicant: Ralph Ropp and Lupine I nterests L L C, represented Dominick
Architects
Planner: Greg Roy
3.25.D R B21-0164.001 - Vail Happy Homes LL C
Final review of a change to approved plans (windows)
Address/Legal Description: 2923 Bellflower Drive Unit 3/Lot 1, Bellflower
Subdivision
Applicant: Vail Happy Homes L L C, represented by Tim Hosking Construction
L L C
Planner: Greg Roy
3.26.D R B21-0184.001 - Salupa LT D
Final review of a change to approved plans (windows)
Address/Legal Description: 1675 Aspen Ridge Road/Lot 6, Block 4, Lion's
Ridge Subdivision Filing 3
Applicant: Salupa LTD, represented by ND G Architecture
Planner: Greg Roy
3.27.D R B21-0391.001 - Schaefer Residence
Final review of a change to approved plans (firepit)
Address/Legal Description: 1874 Glacier Court Unit A/Lot 22, Block 2, Lion's
Ridge Subdivision Filing 3
Applicant: Micha Schaefer
Planner: J onathan Spence
The applic ations and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
October 19, 2021 - Page 109 of 150
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South
Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that
precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Town C ounc il Chambers. Times and order of
items are approximate, subject to c hange, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time
the Design Review Board will c onsider an item. Please call 970-479-2138 for additional
information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification, dial
711.
October 19, 2021 - Page 110 of 150
P L ANNI NG AND E NV I RO NM E NTAL
C O M M IS S IO N
October 11, 2021, 1:00 P M
Town Council Chambers
75 S . Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
1.Call to Order
1.1.Register in advance for this webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/W N_tX L0eRs9QKieoSkwg888J w
1.2.Attendance
Present: Ludwig Kurz, Brian Gillette, Henry Pratt, Rollie Kjesbo, Karen
Perez, Reid Phillips, Pete Seibert
Absent: None
2.Main Agenda
2.1.A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-
16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for the expansion of
an outdoor dining patio, located at 297 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot E-H, Block
5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (P E C21-
0033)
10 min.
Applicant:Michael Gehl (Big Bear Bistro)
Planner:J onathan Spence
1. This Conditional Use permit approval is solely for the seating within
the former smoking area and does not include seating on the Mill
Creek Bridge.
Planner Spence gave an overview of this and the next three applications and
why they are coming before the Commission. These are all for the
expansion of outdoor seating in Vail Village. These locations and dining were
in place during covid as a result of the Governor ’s actions and subsequent
Town actions to allow these during the pandemic.
Kurz asked if the P E C can review the furniture for these dining areas.
Spence answers that the furniture and barrier systems would be reviewed by
the D RB.
Gillette asked if these were in place last year.
Spence answers that yes, in some version these dining areas have been out
there during the pandemic.
Planner Spence introduces the Big Bear Bistro application. They currently
have a C UP for outdoor dining but expanded the area during the pandemic
administratively. The application is to utilize the outdoor smoking area for
additional seating, but the bridge may not be used for seating after October
October 19, 2021 - Page 111 of 150
31st.
No Public Comment.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve with conditions. Brian Gillette seconded the
motion and it passed (7-0).
2.2.A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-
16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for the installation of
an outdoor dining patio, located at 228 Bridge Street Unit B/Lot A Block 5,
Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (P E C21-
0037)
10 min.
Applicant:Drew Riley (Russell's)
Planner:J onathan Spence
Planner Spence explains that Russell’s was allowed one or two seats along
the north of the building and one by the menu board due to covid
allowances. There was also an outdoor bar while it was allowed but is no
longer permitted or proposed. The application now asks for one table by the
vegetable garden and two in the inset where the bench is currently situated.
Music does have a decibel limit. 65 is the limit, which can go up to 80 during
“Après”, then must return to 65 after après.
Pratt asks if this is a total of two tables.
Spence answers that there is a total of three tables being proposed.
Kurz asks if this is only summer.
Spence answers that the applicant has only asked for summer seating.
Kurz has concerns about the choke point at this point in Bridge Street.
Drew Riley, the applicant, states that yes, this is only summer. They will be
able to fit two tables in that area where the bench is. I t allows for enough
space to sit as well as serve.
Pratt believes the triangular space by the bridge seems a bit forced. He is
not comfortable with that location.
Perez agrees on that corner space. People are choked at that point and
could cause issues.
Gillette asks if there has been a table in that location in the past.
Spence does not believe so.
Riley says they would be willing to move it back towards the building and
away from foot traffic. They open only in the evening, so they miss most of
the foot traffic.
Gillette asks if the applicant is willing to table and take this to the next
meeting.
Riley agrees to table for four weeks.
October 19, 2021 - Page 112 of 150
Kjesbo would like to see a site plan.
Pratt asked why the path along the side of the building is not proposed for
seating.
Riley said he believed he was told he was not allowed to because of the
zoning for that stream tract.
No Public Comment.
Brian Gillette moved to table to November 8, 2021. Rollie Kjesbo seconded
the motion and it passed (7-0).
2.3.A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-
16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for the installation of
an outdoor dining patio, located at 254 Bridge Street Unit C/Lot C & L,
Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(P E C21-0040)
10 min.
Applicant:Kathleen Barron (Gorsuch Ski Haus)
Planner:J onathan Spence
1. This Conditional Use Permit approval is contingent upon the applicant
obtaining Town of Vail approval of an associated design review
application.
2. The applicant shall operate the outdoor patio in a manner generally
consistent with the approved site plan dated 07/17/2019.
Planner Spence introduces the application.
Gillette asks if the tables come in at night.
Kathleen Barron confirms that they do come in.
No public comment.
Perez asks what we do about wandering, as she has seen this one moving
from time to time.
Spence answers that he regularly walks that village to try and keep them in
check.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve with conditions. Brian Gillette seconded the
motion and it passed (7-0).
2.4.A request for review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-
16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code, to allow for the installation of
an outdoor dining patio, located at 304 Bridge Street/Lot E-H, Block 5A,
Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (P E C21-
0047)
10 min.
Applicant:J ennifer Linzinmeir (The Red Lion)
Planner:J onathan Spence
1. This Conditional Use Permit approval is contingent upon the applicant
obtaining Town of Vail approval of an associated design review
application.
2. The applicant shall operate the outdoor patio in a manner generally
consistent with the approved site plan dated 07/17/2019.
October 19, 2021 - Page 113 of 150
Planner Spence introduces this application. I t is for a new outdoor dining
area that was not previously a C UP. This was done only during covid and is
proposing to come in for full approval. This one tends to wander and gather
more seats than feasible for the location. The seat by the t shirt shop to the
south will not be allowed after the 31st of October.
Kjesbo asks if we are still doing sleeves for posts.
Spence answers that we are not as those have been seen to be a trip
hazard. I f spaces tend to move, we will look at acceptable way to keep that
from happening.
J enn Linzinmeir asks if there will a direction for the stations.
Spence answers that the D RB will be reviewing that portion and will be
forthcoming. Planters may be an option.
Gillette asks if planters in the winter would be treated with appropriate
plantings.
Spence confirms.
No public comment.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve with conditions. Brian Gillette seconded the
motion and it passed (7-0).
2.5.A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a Prescribed
Regulation Amendment pursuant to Section 12-3-7 Amendment, Vail Town
Code to amend Section 12-15-3 Definition, Calculation, and Exclusions,
Vail Town Code, to add an exemption to allow vaults for car lift systems to be
excluded from the GRFA calculation and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (P E C21-0046)
40 min.
Applicant:K H W ebb Architects & Mauriello Planning Group
Planner:Greg Roy
Planner Roy introduces amendment and addresses existing code and
proposed language. He touches on the criteria needed for an underground
vault to be exempted from GRFA.
Kjesbo asks if it effects how parking is calculated right now?
Roy says we would allow them to count them as required spaces so you
could accommodate more parking on the inside.
Gillette asks how is it not counted currently?
Roy says we exempt only 600 sf of a garage from GRFA.
Gillette asks for clarification on basement exemptions.
Roy clarifies it’s the 6-foot rule.
Gillette says you do not need all the proposed exemptions.
Roy says that would be another way to look at it.
October 19, 2021 - Page 114 of 150
Gillette says he was never in favor of that language to begin with.
Roy says this language will be very specific to underground vaults to avoid
confusion.
Gillette asks for clarification.
Roy says it would be cleaner for the proposal to have its own section than
add to existing.
Gillette says the thinks the exemption list is excessive.
Phillips likes that there is more interior parking, and that the structure is
exclusive for vehicle storage. Wants it to be added as number nine in the
code, rather than reworking 6 ft off grade issue.
Gillette asks where number nine would be added?
Roy points to the list of exemptions currently in the code.
Phillips asks how do you handle the credit for the parking spots?
Roy says it would be additional parking, you could have a four car garage in
a two car space. He references the code and how where the proposal would
fit in the GRFA section.
Gillette and Roy discuss where the amendment should best be placed.
Pratt says there is currently no size limitation, what would stop people from
using this as an elevator with additional space. He also asks if the machine
room is exempt?
Roy says the car lift system would be enclosed in the vault.
Pratt is concerned there is no size limit in the regulations, and someone
would add 6 vehicles.
Roy says staff is open to the possibility of adding language that would limit
the size of the vaults in area.
Dominic Mauriello speaks on behalf of the applicant. He says Exemption B
addresses what Pratt is worried about.
Pratt clarifies he is worried about lateral size.
Mauriello doesn’t’ have a problem with that, especially if it is below grade. He
says it makes sense to have the criteria built in here. The original basement
code led to confusion in some instances. Environmentally it also helps to
have less pavement and parking on the grounds.
Pratt says this doesn’t count against the 600 sf. This is free garage space.
Gillett asks if you have two cars you get 600 sf?
Pratt says this is free square footage for a garage. He likes the concept, but
he doesn’t see limits on size. I f it doesn’t count against the 600sf, its’
essentially free space.
October 19, 2021 - Page 115 of 150
Mauriello says you can get up to 1,200 square feet of exempted garage
space in certain zone districts.
Roy clarifies the code allows 600 sf per allowable unit.
Pratt doesn’t want it to be an elevator or a lift. Do we care if somebody
wants to stack three cars?
Phillips says they can’t do it under this 16 foot height limit.
Gillette why does someone with a car lift gets a bigger basement deduction
than someone that doesn’t? W hat is the purpose?
Spence says this is an area not being counted towards GRFA, not a
deduction.
Gillette says the fire department won’t allow this to be the only egress.
Spence says that is the case at a house on Mill Creek where it has been
approved.
Kjesbo says the public benefit is getting the parking off the surface.
Gillette says none of this makes sense to him.
Kjesbo proposes a condition: two parking spaces per each allowable unit.
Roy says the garage vault would be limited to two parking spaces per
allowable unit.
Mauriello knows a case where someone used GRFA for a four-car garage.
He asks should people be able to have additional underground spaces.
Kjesbo says we can let staff craft the language on this.
Spence proposes that the area of the underground space is limited to only
the area beneath the garage.
Pratt would like to keep the language simple and at two spaces per allowable
unit.
Gillette asks how you’re defining a garage space?
Roy says the size is 10x20 ft. W e can limit it to two per allowable unit within
the footprint of the garage.
Spence says staff will write the language.
Spence and Mauriello discuss proposed language.
Gillette says you can’t fit two cars in a 600 square foot garage.
Spence says that people in town are doing it with less space. He says
regulations can’t account for everything but have to account for the vast
majority of situations.
October 19, 2021 - Page 116 of 150
Pratt says the vault should stay within 600 square feet.
Spence reiterates there is up to 1,200 sf of garage deductions in some
existing zones.
Gillette asks how is the basement deduction is currently calculated? I s it
proposed or existing?
Spence says whichever is more restrictive. The idea with the vaults is that
they are below grade.
Gillette says you could create a mound a get it below grade. He points out
that the language is finished grade not existing grade.
Kurz wants to move towards a motion with conditions that satisfy the
concerns being expressed.
Gillette reviews the board’s concerns.
Kjesbo says you’re only two parking spaces per allowed unit.
Spence proposes the maximum size of any underground parking vault shall
be 600 sf per unit.
Pratt is not comfortable with the 600 sf. He would prefer to go back to two lift
spaces per allowable unit.
Mauriello says to think about the practicality of construction.
Pratt’s concern is that 600 square feet is more than two parking spaces.
You’re giving them extra space for storage.
Spence says it’s a scissor system, about the size of the car.
Pratt says the lift is not the size of the car.
Gillette says a 15-foot-tall garage could hold multiple cars.
Spence says GRFA takes careful consideration.
Pratt says his concern is that rules can’t be abused and create storage.
Spence we can table this, and applicant can bring in an engineer.
Pratt likes two cars per allowable unit vs 600 square footage language.
Gillette there is nothing that says they will be used for cars.
Mauriello says 10x20 is a pretty good size for cars.
Spence proposes a 400 square feet allowable size if that is what the board
wants.
Kjesbo the maximum size is 400 square feet per allowable unit.
We want the regulations to fit the structure not the use. So that whether
you’re a single family or a duplex the rules are the same.
October 19, 2021 - Page 117 of 150
Phillips says the lift mechanics are included in the 16’ height which also
makes it harder to stack cars. He references past projects in town.
Gillette asks for clarification about proposed language and Spence says the
staff will incorporate the P E C’s comments.
Kjesbo says let’s write the language and come back in two weeks.
No public comment.
Motion to Table to October 25.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to table to October 25, 2021. Brian Gillette seconded
the motion and it passed (7-0).
2.6.A request for recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section
12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for the adoption of the West Vail
Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (P E C21-0036)
60 min.
Applicant:Town of Vail, represented by S E Group
Planner:Matt Gennett
Community Development Director Matt Gennett reviews the previous
meeting and the actions taken to prepare for this meeting.
Gabby Voeller with S E Group addresses the track-changes version of the
West Vail Master Plan that includes comments from the P E C, Vail Fire and
Emergency Services (V F E S), and the Vail Local Housing Authority
(V L HA).
Gillette asks to go through the comments.
Ellie Wachtel reads through the comments from the P E C.
Voeller goes through comments in the document. The first one addresses
sunlight, sustainability, and green-building practices. She also touches on
grocery stores, additional residential units, and variable heights to preserve
sun exposure.
Perez asks a question about the specific grammar which Wachtel answers.
Wachtel and Voeller address additional comments added by V LHA.
Gillette asks if Council will know who the comments are from.
Gennett says a majority of P E C can concur or disagree with changes
suggested based on comments received and Council will review the revised
document which will be the product of this process.
Voeller moves on and states the consultants disagree with a V L HA comment
regarding bulk and mass standards controlling density rather than number of
units and GRFA.
Gillette asks if you’re recommending there would be no GRFA?
Voeller says it is not recommended for the commercial areas.
October 19, 2021 - Page 118 of 150
Gennett says GRFA is applicable and calculated based on the specific zone
district.
Pratt is against bulk and mass standards, says developers will build to those
lines.
Gillette says parking is biggest caveat in controlling density.
Pratt reiterates his concerns about bulk and mass.
Gillette is ok with the V LHA comments.
Pratt asks what council will do with this document?
Gennett says Council will be reviewing the document that the P E C
recommends approval of.
Voeller says it is important to think about town-wide consistency. I t could be
complicated if there are different calculation methods in different parts of
town.
Gillette says there should be flexibility with the density requirements. He asks
for a straw poll.
Phillips has an issue with going away from the consistency of what the town
is already doing. He supports the consultant’s recommendation.
Kurz says they should go down the line on this item. Kjesbo agrees with
consultants, Kurz agrees, Gillette agrees for simplicity, Pratt is against using
bulk and mass, and Siebert agrees. Perez is also in agreement suggests
adding language like “as the market permits” so that there is some flexibility
if the unit type and count needs to change.
Kurz agrees with this statement. He reviews the process of the plan so far,
says the P E C can make recommendations to council but that we are not yet
at the point of a finished product. The document will not be perfect at this
time and will change in the future. He gives credit to those that produced it
and try and come up with something to send to council.
Voeller addresses Fire Departments comments that design guidelines will be
responsive to public safety considerations.
Voeller moves to Chapter 3. She addresses the V LHA comment regarding
deed-restricted units in Zoning Recommendation #1.
Gillette asks how we decided on these specific numbers? We didn’t want to
make it infeasible to redevelop these properties.
Wachtel says it was to keep in spirit with the V L HA comment.
Pratt says it is self-defeating that if you go above 9 units per acre, the rest
must be deed restricted.
Gillette asks for clarification with the numbers.
Wachtel reiterates the V LHA comments about the specific numbers.
October 19, 2021 - Page 119 of 150
Gillette says if you want to increase density to something over 9 units per
acre, half of the additional units have to be deed restricted.
Wachtel says they will remove V L HA’s comments in this regard.
Pratt clarifies that half the units over 9 would be deed restricted.
The Consultants disagree with V L HA suggestion for a minimum density with
market rate units.
At least 4 commissioners agree with consultants (Phillips, Kjesbo, Kurz,
Siebert).
Wachtel says a lot of the recommendations are aimed at reducing the
number of non-conformities.
Voeller addresses a comment that no short-term rentals are allowed in this
zone district for any property that is benefitting from the zoning.
Gillette and Phillips say if redevelopment occurs it would trigger this clause.
Wachtel says there are around 10 short term rentals in the Chamonix area
and around another 10 in the Geneva area.
Pratt says the proposed language of the other two is infringing on property
rights.
Phillips says if they utilize the redevelopment zoning, then they cannot have
short term rentals. Otherwise, it is a little iffy legally.
Gillette says if you have a non-conforming property and redevelop, you are
benefitting from the zoning.
Perez asks whether we grandfather in the existing unit?
Gillett asks doesn’t short-term rentals mean it is being utilized as housing.
Voeller says not necessarily and cites examples.
Gillette asks where we go with this?
Pratt says somehow, we must allow people their property rights if they want
to redevelop, but if people are benefitting from what they have now than
there will be no short-term rentals.
Gillette says he is not necessarily in favor of getting rid of the old stuff.
Perez says you grandfather in to get rid of the old stuff and replace with new
stuff, with additional units prior to redevelopment.
Gillette says it is getting too complicated, it shouldn’t be different from the
rest of town.
Pratt doesn’t want to take away property rights.
Gennett says there would be no need for grandfathering, existing structures
would be conforming with the new zoning.
October 19, 2021 - Page 120 of 150
Gillette says any redevelopment would be benefitting from the new code.
Phillips cites the example of a 6-plex. Anyone that has a non-conforming
structure will benefit from rezoning.
Gennett they will become conforming with adoption of new zoning.
Phillips says only the new units added in the benefit would be no short-term
rentals.
Gillette reminds that some of the units will be deed restricted.
Perez says when you apply for a short-term rental license you must put in
the address.
Gennett confirms.
Voeller says certain addresses would be registered as not allowed to have
short term rentals.
Siebert says you can’t take the original six units and cut back on property
rights.
Voeller says it is not a property right that you get to short-term rent your
house. She cites court cases to this effect. The TOV has leeway here.
Perez says we are not allowed to buy out these deed restricted units as a
property right.
Gillette says we do allow this.
Siebert asks for clarification. I f I lose the ability to short-term rent that is a
property right that I lost.
Gennett won’t speak for town attorney. I t is allowed as ancillary or accessory
to the residential use by right. The town could change course on short-term
rentals, and changes would be legal by his understanding. There will be
additional steps for public comments and consideration during the rezoning
process. We’re not changing the zoning with the adoption of this plan.
These are recommendation and rezoning would come afterwards.
Voeller says she is hearing consensus from the board,
Gillette asks a question about deed restriction buyouts or exchanges.
Spence says you must go through the process and be conforming with
zoning in the end.
Voeller addresses additional comments.
Wachtel says there are two approaches regarding the rezoning in W est Vail.
The consultant team is proposing a W est Vail Multifamily 2 zoning districts to
address the next V L HA comment and W achtel outlines details of this
comment.
Voeller clarifies this is a lower density version of West Vail Multifamily 1.
October 19, 2021 - Page 121 of 150
Wachtel says the other option is to extend W est Vail Multifamily 1.
Gillette asks what is existing in the Geneva/Alpine neighborhood.
Wachtel covers the existing numbers, there are 36 lots, 67 units. She
outlines these numbers under the different proposed zoning scenarios if
every lot was redeveloped.
Gillette and Pratt like the lesser density here. Phillips agrees on Multi-Family
Zoning 2.
Wachtel says the deed restriction requirements would be in line with those
previously discussed.
Voeller and W achtel show the new suggested zoning maps, incorporating
the P E C comments from the previous meeting.
Gillette and Phillips ask about the end of Alpine Drive. They want to make
sure the new map conforms to the discussions from previous meetings.
Wachtel says the small lot sizes were removed in the new map.
Phillips agrees these are the small lots on the west side of Alpine Dr.
Voeller says they’re trying to capture the multiplexes in the area.
Phillips agrees with the recommendation of not including those smaller lots.
Gillette asks about Geneva and Matterhorn.
Wachtel says it was looked at but not changed at this point.
Phillips talks about the existing character of the area, says the current
delineation is good.
Voeller says they endorse the V LHA comment about changing the code to
grandfather in nonconforming properties.
Spence says that creates challenging situations for zoning when neighbors
have different rules
Wachtel says if this makes sense to do, it will apply to some non-conforming
structures but that it would not be area wide.
Voeller addresses V LHA comments in Recommendation #1. She uses 4-
plex example; when it is redeveloped it would be allowed to keep some of the
non-conformities.
Wachtel says they wanted to include V LHA’s comments, but grandfather in
nonconforming properties strategically.
Voeller asks what the board position is?
Gillette says make the changes they’ve discussed and leave the rest alone
otherwise it will be impossible to manage. He doesn’t want to fuss around
with the existing zoning.
October 19, 2021 - Page 122 of 150
Kjesbo says the affected lots can go to the P E C at that time and Pratt
agrees.
Voeller addresses V LHA comment on Recommendation #2 regarding site
coverage and building height. S E Group suggested an additional 5-10% of
site coverage to allow additional units to be built. V LHA wanted no number to
be named. She says again it would be complicated if the town had a
different system here than elsewhere.
Gillette asks where this would be in effect?
Wachtel says all over West Vail.
Gillette wants to contain all these recommendations to the new zone districts.
The P E C will review this at the appropriate time.
Kjesbo agrees, wants it to be consistent with the rest of town.
Wachtel addresses the V L HA comment in Recommendation #3 regarding
GRFA requirements.
Pratt is against unlimited GRFA.
Gillette says P E C disagrees with this comment, and GRFA is important to
control massing.
Wachtel addresses V LHA comment in Recommendation #4 regarding. She
says 400 sf is relatively large for a studio, that could be decreased.
Spence says there are currently no minimums or maximums relating to
E HUs.
Pratt and Gillette say to delete the comment on Recommendation #4.
Voeller addresses V LHA comment underneath Recommendation #4. The
consultants say its outside the scope of this plan.
Gillette asks for staff comment and Spence agrees with consultants.
Voeller addresses V LHA comment in Recommendation #6. There is a lot of
public comment against parking lots with rows of cars backing in and
backing out.
The majority of P E C agrees with the consultant’s language.
Voeller addresses Fire Department comment that parking requirement
deductions should include analysis of emergency service requirements.
Wachtel says V L HA said further study is needed here.
Voeller says V L HA wanted to remove highlighted text in Scenario 1.
Gillett says it should be accessed from either side.
Gillette asks if Chamonix units are deed-restricted in the plan?
Wachtel said they would have to be deed-restricted with current zoning. She
October 19, 2021 - Page 123 of 150
is recommending that is changed in the new plan to support redevelopment.
Voeller says Commercial Core 3 is currently 100% deed restricted and the
goal is to reduce that to 50. Voeller clarifies that group disagrees with
massing controls.
Voeller addresses comment about deed-restricted units that some would be
purchased, and some would be rental units. She gives examples of how the
two paths would work.
Gillette asks who gets to sell and who gets to rent.
Voeller says it’s a master plan, they will have to see how it plays out.
Gennett says it is flexible, we don’t regulate ownership structures today.
Voeller addresses V LHA comments on page 25.
Pratt says a mixture of unit sizes is desirable, but he’s not sure how you
control it.
Perez says a developer will do a market study and do what makes sense for
them.
Voeller cites examples from Denver and other cities which are trying to
retain families with higher unit development. There is a policy choice here,
what is your vision?
Pratt says parking will drive the end account.
As a policy, Pratt and Phillips and Gillette agree with comment.
Wachtel addresses comments about short-term rentals on pg. 26.
Perez brings up that we said no additional units in this language.
Wachtel says this will be revised to match the board’s wishes.
Voeller addresses V LHA comment regarding Policy and Program #6,
consultants do not agree.
Perez has a problem with the use of the word solely.
Kjesbo says there cannot be different design standards in W est Vail.
Bellm says Policy Recommendation #5 was never discussed with the board.
W hen a plan recommends waiving fees 100%, you’re restricting what future
councils can do. You’re saying that deed-restricted units can be built for
free.
Perez has a problem with waiving all fees. Suggests handling fee waivers for
deed-restricted units on a case-by-case basis. We can’t hamstring the
council or hurt the community that relies on some of these fees.
Gillette says this town adds a lot to the cost of building, then wonders why
housing is so expensive. Says it’s just a recommendation and is appropriate
for now. Phillips agrees.
October 19, 2021 - Page 124 of 150
Bellm says she agreed with Perez that the waivers are considered on a
case-by-case basis, rather than waiving all fees.
Perez says it could be used in West Vail but not the rest of town.
Phillips says there is a huge benefit to waiving the fees to incentivize that
type of development. But perhaps you could get fees back rather than get
waived on the front end.
Gillette asks for clarification.
Spence cites current regulations.
Kjesbo likes the idea of a refund at the end.
Bellm says we can’t legally waive construction use tax; it has to be refunded
after. You can still return all the money, but we shouldn’t promise it up front.
Gillette says they may have an easier time getting financing if the fee is
waived up front.
Kjesbo disagrees and agrees with Bellm.
Phillips says how do you get building fees back if the project decides not to
be deed restricted. He thinks a rebate process is a simpler process.
Kurz says the board agrees with the intent and wants to proceed.
Gillette says let’s revise it where it is a refund and not a waiver of the fee.
Gennett confirms.
Wachtel addresses comments in transportation section. This includes Fire
Department comments about emergency access, Pratt’s concern about
unnecessary signage, speedbumps, and road diet.
The board has no additional comments on this.
Voeller moves to the implementation chapter. Wachtel addresses V LHA
comment on Special Development Districts (S D D) which consultants do not
agree with.
Gennett doesn’t want to create a limitation in the zone district, where you
cannot apply for an S D D. Says it is more equitable, allows for creativity,
wants to keep a level playing field.
Perez agrees and says the P E C can still address these applications as they
come.
Voeller disagrees with V L HA suggestion of removal of language that the
planning department and housing department coordinate.
Gillette agrees.
Gennett addresses condition of approval should P E C forward
recommendation of approval. Board is recommending approval of a
October 19, 2021 - Page 125 of 150
document that includes their final recommendations.
Kurz asks for public comment.
J ack Bergey is a homeowner in West Vail. He likes Perez’s idea of a
grandfather clause. He wants to revisit the zoning map.
Gillette clarifies the lots that were removed on Upper Chamonix.
Bergey says he has a 3000 square foot lot that is perfect for employee
housing. He clarifies the existing boundaries with the board. He asks for
clarification regarding the recommendation for additional units.
Gillette says you have to build 9 units/buildable acre, including 1 deed
restricted.
Phillips asks about Bergey’s current situation.
Gillette says if you redevelop you have built 9 units/buildable acre, including
1 deed-restricted.
Perez says J ack is asking can I rebuild my 6 units?
Gillette says you could rebuild with 4 units, 2 market rate and 2 deed
restricted. He says you are grandfathered on short-term rentals not deed
restrictions.
Gennett says because of maximum density, could you still build back 6 units
if that is existing.
Phillips says the existing non-conforming units could be rebuilt under the
new code (keep the existing number of units). Your 6 units carries forward,
restrictions apply to the number of new units.
Bergey clarifies what is currently existing.
Phillips wants to give J ack the ability to rebuild at 6. Perez thought that was
present in the language.
Phillips doesn’t want to lose housing stock. Non-conforming units would
carry over under the new zoning without penalty.
Gillette says by allowing these properties to be redeveloped you could lose
housing stock.
Phillips wants Bergey to be able to rebuild what he had before and then
potentially add to it.
Gillette wants to preserve housing stock, through some deed-restrictions.
Perez asks can he build back what he has? I f he adds additional units, how
many of those are deed-restricted?
Phillips says he understood that non-conforming units would carry forward;
clipping the number of units removes the incentive to redevelop.
Perez and Gillette are concerned that these will become unaffordable to
October 19, 2021 - Page 126 of 150
workers.
Phillips says this example makes no sense if regulations restrict
redevelopment to fewer units.
Voeller clarifies the language in Town Council Recommendation #1.
Perez says the issue is he can’t redevelop to the existing number of units.
Gillette brings up the short-term rental again.
Wachtel says the intention is to reach a level of density (9-18) that people
feel comfortable with, without resorting to spot-zoning. That has been the
current strategy. Voeller reiterates language in Zoning Recommendation #1.
Gillette asks what he is allowed to do currently with existing zoning.
Kjesbo says he can put two units and an E HU on the property.
Spence says existing duplexes on lots less than 15,000 square feet can be
redeveloped and an E HU can be added.
Gillette says we’re not taking anything away from him and is concerned
we’re going to lose employee housing stock. He says there is a right number
that should be used everywhere.
Kjesbo he should be allowed to put 6 units with no deed restrictions since
that is existing.
Gillette and Kjesbo discuss rental market.
Voeller says the deed restriction issue can be solved. She asks about the
number of units that should be deed-restricted?
Gillette says keep it simple for the whole zone district.
Kjesbo says you have to look at existing conditions of a specific lot.
Spence says just because you have that allowable density, doesn’t mean it
will be realized along with meeting the other regulations.
Kjesbo he shouldn’t be penalized for the number of units he already has.
Spence says Gillette’s concern is by replacing existing stock you will lose
affordability. The question here is does retaining six units benefit the town?
Phillips says we can sit here all day and speculate rents. Gillette and Phillips
discuss the correct number of deed-restricted units.
Phillips says the goal is not to lose numbers of housing stock.
Gennett says in aggregate the goal is no net loss and to increase housing
stock, despite a small number of exceptions.
Perez says the Town Council’s directive was clear, to increase housing
stock in W est Vail.
October 19, 2021 - Page 127 of 150
Voeller reviews new language for Zoning Recommendation #1. She says
deed restrictions rules would also apply.
Kjesbo and Perez agree. Gillette agrees as long as deed restrictions are in
place.
Kurz says the board engaged in some negotiation that is not necessarily
their charge. Their responsibility is to look at the bigger picture and not
necessarily individual cases.
Gillette says public comment is appreciated if it stirs discussion. Voeller and
Phillips agree.
Motion for recommendation to Town Council with the condition that the
modifications agreed to by the P E C be incorporated into the final draft of
the plan upon adoption.
Rollie Kjesbo moved to recommend approval with conditions. Karen Perez
seconded the motion and it passed (6-0).
Absent:(1)Pratt
3.Approval of Minutes
3.1.September 27, 2021 P E C Results
Rollie Kjesbo moved to approve. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (6-0).
Absent:(1)Pratt
4.Adjournment
Rollie Kjesbo moved to adjourn. Brian Gillette seconded the motion and it
passed (6-0).
Absent:(1)Pratt
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspec tion during regular offic e hours at the
Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project
orientation and the site vis its that prec ede the public hearing in the Tow n of Vail Community Development Department.
Times and order of items are approximate, subject to c hange, and c annot be relied upon to determine at w hat time the
Planning and Environmental Commission w ill c onsider an item. Please c all (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Please
call 711 for sign language interpretation 48 hour prior to meeting time.
Community Development Department
October 19, 2021 - Page 128 of 150
VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO
I T E M /T O P I C: F uture Council Meeting Topics
AT TAC H ME N TS:
Description
Memo Future Topics (proposed)
October 19, 2021 - Page 129 of 150
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Town Clerk’s Office
Date: October 19, 2021
Subject: Proposed agenda topics for future meeting agendas
Vail Town Council Meetings
Topics & Times subject to change "Time of Day"
11/2/2021 (Election Day)
Ribbon Cutting for Grand Opening of CGL afternoon
CHC Program Updates: 1) Review Trailblazer Award Nomination Process; 2)
Guidelines for Naming Criteria, 3) Global Friendship Exchange : Cortina and St.
Moritz visits
afternoon
Town Manager Review ES
Recognition for outgoing council members evening
Budget Supplemental (1st Reading) tentative evening
16-Nov-21
Swear in new members & select Mayor & Mayor Pro Tem afternoon
Guest Experience Updates (PrimaVail, Revely, Concerts)afternoon
Update on East Vail Fuels Reduction Program afternoon
East Vail CDOT Parcel afternoon
2022 Mill Levy Certification Ordinance (First Reading)evening
12/7/2021
Ford Park Master Plan Updates about process afternoon
2022 Mill Levy Certification Ordinance (Second Reading)evening
12/21/2021
Review Council Committee Appointments afternoon
Future Topics
DRB Joint meeting TBD
Update about Climate Action Collaborative's recommendations for TOV building codes TBD
USFS update about preserving bighorn sheep from mixing w/ domesticated sheep TBD
Update about rezoning Black Gore Drive property (town owned property)TBD
Invitation to Kate Cocherella thanking her for years of service on school board TBD
City Market Update (improvements and maintenance)TBD
Stream Protection Corridor Legislation TBD
Civic Area Plan TBD
2020 Model Traffic Code (speed limits)TBD
October 19, 2021 - Page 130 of 150
VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO
I T E M /T O P I C: A rt in Public Places September 13, 2021 Minutes
AT TAC H ME N TS:
Description
Art in Public Places September 13, 2021 Minutes
October 19, 2021 - Page 131 of 150
Public Notice - Art in Public Places Board Meeting Minutes
Monday, September 13, 2021 - 8:30 a.m.
AIPP Board members present: Susanne Graf, Tracy Gordon Kathy Langenwalter, Courtney St. John,
Lindsea Stowe
Others present: Molly Eppard, AIPP Coordinator
1. Swearing in and introduction of new AIPP Board member Lindsea Stowe.
2. Approval of August 2, 2021 meeting minutes.
3. Citizen input.
4. Approval of sculpture by Jeff Jackson as public art for Altus development.
•Molly reviews the process of approving art in the private developments.
•The art consultant’s proposal for the work on behalf of Altus is consistent with the installed
sculpture. The Board approves the installed sculpture by Jeff Jackson.
•The Board remarks while the location is not ideal for the work to be viewed on the property, it
does fulfill their public art requirement as presented earlier this year.
5. Relocation of Lion by Frederick Prescott from Children’s Garden of Learning.
•Molly shows an image of the Lion as it is presently at the entrance of the CGL. The work is
being drawn upon with chalk by the children. The Board comments that they do not want to
encourage drawing upon works of art in public display.
•Due mostly to safety reasons the Board agrees to relocate the work to the west of the stairs of
the Lionshead Welcome Center.
•It will be an appropriate entry art feature to Lionshead, especially having the work facing the
mountain.
6. Winter 2021/22
•Molly updates the Board on the collaboration between Olive Moya and Paul Wertin for this
season’s 15th Vail Winterfest ice installation on the Gore Creek Promenade.
•Initial concepts will be presented at the October 4th Board Meeting.
•Finalized concepts for the Winterfest installation will be presented at the November 1st Board
Meeting.
•Molly asks the Board for feedback how to address the Lantern making and walk portion of the
Winterfest.
•The Board would like to keep the identity of Winterfest as a free and family event and separate
from other events during this time. This year will mark its Fifteenth year of the installation and
celebrations.
•The Board would like to continue providing the take home lantern kits.
October 19, 2021 - Page 132 of 150
•Susanne offers to connect with some of the schools about the event.
•Molly suggests we look at the four corners of the International Bridge for display of the lanterns
and perhaps installing the bistro lights again on the bridge.
•The Board may want to reimagine the walk portion given the age of the participants and Covid .
•Should we invite artists in an RFP to create larger more complex lanterns for display on the
bridge and a procession? It is noted that we can then invite kids to line up and enjoy the
procession or keep the opening of Winterfest an entire evening versus a specific start time.
•The Board will come back to the October meeting with more realized concepts for the Lantern
portion of Winterfest.
7. Strategic Vision Plan for AIPP.
•At the August 2, 2021 AIPP meeting, the Board voted to proceed with updating the adopted
2001 AIPP Strategic Plan. The Town of Vail’s goals and adopted action plans have seen
significant changes which affect the operations and direction of AIPP over the past 20 years.
The Board would like to focus on a 10-year plan to update and elevate the AIPP mission,
vision, approval process of donations to collection, commissioned works, temporary
installations, Cultural Heritage Committee initiatives, public art in capital projects and private
developments to align with that of the Town of Vail’s vision “to be a premier international
destination resort community.” This plan would also encompass the overall cultural goals and
structure for the use of the Ford Park Art Studio Space. The collaborative vision development,
research, and roadmap to these goals will be implemented by consulting experts for municipal
art plans and would take approximately six months for completion and approval .
Timeline: Request for proposals for AIPP issued November 1, 2021
Deadline for proposals November 26, 2021
Review of proposals, interviews, selection December 20, 2021
Contract award with art consultant January 2022.
•How does the potential donation of several sculptures from the Logan collection align with an
updated strategic plan for AIPP?
•Molly has researched a few art consultants who facilitate strategic public art planning for
municipalities. Given we have a base of a strategic plan in place, this would be updating the
existing plan and likely a four-month process.
•We want to consider what a consultant might recommend for others to participate in the
planning outside of the AIPP Board.
•It is presently budgeted at $25,000. Kathy comments that we will want to have in person
meetings with whomever is awarded the project.
•This would be an opportunity to outline the vision of the Ford Park Art Space:
o How does a residency look with length of stay, expectations, stipend, public
engagement, application, invitation to artists?
Per Council direction upon staff recommendation at May 4, 2021 Council meeting:
•Demolish existing structure and build a new structure on a new foundation that
resembles the existing building but has the features and systems to
accommodate all the anticipated art’s needs. This new structure could be
somewhat larger than the existing structure, but would be similar in nature.
Overall cost will vary depending on the scale and amenities, but the new
construction is the least cost per conditioned space.
•Based on a construction cost per square foot, final design and construction
documents, FFE, permits, construction management and site work we believe
the project will cost $850,000 including the contingency. AIPP would allocate
October 19, 2021 - Page 133 of 150
$250,000 from existing funds in the AIPP “destination art” account towards this
project.
8.Future sculpture installation locations in Vail Village
•Molly with the help of PW staff has identified approximately 6 locations within Vail Village for
placement of potential sculpture locations from the Logan collection.
•Several areas surrounding the Vail Village parking structure and within Vail Village have been
identified as locations for potential sculpture placement. Enhancements in the landscaping
efforts (design, materials, plants and installation) would greatly improve the aesthetics of the
art locations.
•The goal is to create thoughtfully curated spaces at these highly visible locations. (Images
attached)
•There are several locations around the main stairwell of the Vail Village parking structure.
While for many it is a first impression to Vail, it is also the final impression. There is opportunity
to enhance this experience with the placement of sculptures and addressing the landscaping
efforts.
•It would be ideal to relocate the Robert Tully sculpture, so that it is in a more visible location.
Presently it gets lost in the rock placement behind it.
•Molly comments on the article recently written on Vail’s AIPP in the Sept/Oct issue of
SEPT-OCT 2021 - Haute Living San Francisco (hautelivingsf.com) (falls on page 95)
•Molly discusses the various works and tasks the Board with considering placement, interaction,
safety, maintenance for the possible sculptures at these locations.
•The Board would like Molly to discuss some of the placement suggestions for the various
sculptures with the Logans.
•The experience of the parking structures has been elevated over the past couple of years with
the inclusions of the murals, the Lawrence Weiner work, etc.
9.Coordinator Updates
•Pinecone sculpture arrived and we will look at locations around the clubhouse with the VRD.
10.Meeting adjourned.
October 19, 2021 - Page 134 of 150
Altus Public Art – Sculpture by Jeff Jackson
South Frontage Road
October 19, 2021 - Page 135 of 150
Lion by Frederick Prescott
Relocation from Children’s Garden of Learning
October 19, 2021 - Page 136 of 150
Planter bed – Western stairs of Lionshead Welcome Center – possible relocation of work
October 19, 2021 - Page 137 of 150
October 19, 2021 - Page 138 of 150
October 19, 2021 - Page 139 of 150
October 19, 2021 - Page 140 of 150
October 19, 2021 - Page 141 of 150
October 19, 2021 - Page 142 of 150
October 19, 2021 - Page 143 of 150
October 19, 2021 - Page 144 of 150
VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO
I T E M /T O P I C: V L MD A C S eptember Meeting Minutes
AT TAC H ME N TS:
Description
V L MD AC September Meeting Minutes
October 19, 2021 - Page 145 of 150
Vail Local Marketing District Advisory Council
Monthly Meeting
September 15, 2021, 8:30 am
Town Council Chambers & Virtual Zoom
VLMDAC member attendees:
Esmarie Faessler (Sonnenalp), Erica Cannava (Manor Vail Lodge), Jana Morgan (Sweet Basil),
Michael Holton (Vail Health), Liana Moore (Antlers), Jenn Bruno (TOV council), Scott Gubrud
(Four Seasons), Kam Bozich (Slifer, Smith & Frampton)
Additional attendees:
Kristin Yantis (MYPR), Meggen Kirkham (SITE Marketing), Ainslie Fortune (Cactus),
Mia Vlaar (Town of Vail), Jeremy Gross (Town of Vail), Liz Gladitsch (Town of Vail), Carlie Smith
(Town of Vail), Mark Herron (lodging Liaison), Bob Brown, Chris Romer (Vail Valley
Partnership), Jeremy Coleman, Kay Schneider (Vail Valley Partnership), Barbara Anderson, Jodi
Doney
Call to Order
Esmarie called meeting to order 8:33AM
l. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Review, finalize and approve the 2022 Operating Plan & Budget
- Approve August VLMDAC minutes
ll. DISCUSSION TOPICS
• 2022 VLMD Operating Plan & Budget
2021 Revenue
3% up from 2019, a better December, January, February than 2019
2021 Summary
Strategic shifts- Building the DiscoverVail website and database infrastructure allows us to
adapt to changing conditions and create stronger relationships with the “right” guest (out of
state, spend more/stay longer/protective of this place)
2021 Successes
116,480 customer records, up 46% year to date
Significant website enhancements
Data Roadmap
New Brand Campaign
Events
Sustainable Practices Guest Education Campaign
Town Council Action Plan
2022 Overarching Business Goal
Drive responsible revenue growth in Vail by focusing on quality of guest, length of stay, and
guest spend, along with effective communication of community values. Measurement continues
October 19, 2021 - Page 146 of 150
to be through occupancy and average daily rate, lodging and sales tax revenues, especially
during lower demand times.
2022 Marketing Priorities- Optimizing Visitation, Grow Database & Build Relationships,
Destination Stewardship, Brand Positioning
lll. INFORMATION UPDATE
• Monthly Financial Report/Supplemental Budget Request Update
July – 362,000 36% up from 2019 101% from 2022
Lodging tax is up
See presentation for more detail
• Campaign Production & Asset Acquisition Updates
Tier 1- Cactus wrapped up “life is but a dream” production. Consisting of two drone
days and two full shoot days. Currently moving into the edit phase.
Cactus aiming to share a near final cot at the October meeting
Tier 2- Site & Cactus in partnership with Jack Affleck and STEEP Motion wrapped
production of Tier 2 capturing 5 hero moments:
Father/Daughter riding gondola, Couple in hot-tub, woman in swimming pool, woman
on horse in Gore Range, woman in Arrabelle window
• 2021 Sustainability Principles Campaign Updates
September 16- Business community communication requesting participation and
Introduction to campaign
September 21- Sustainability Quiz and trip giveaway live
Media live
Email to database- take quiz to win trip
September 24- Collateral and swag distribution to businesses and Welcome Center
• Summer Lodging Survey & SOAR Analysis
A total of 109 surveys were sent with 31% responding vs. 27% in Winter
The same 11 questions as winter plus two new questions
Results were compared 2021 vs. 2020
A 4.0 scale all responses were above 2.0
16 out of 21 ratings increased
90% indicated VLMD marketing is very important
3 most important issues for the TOV- 1. Workforce shortage/availability 31%
2.Workforce housing 31% 3.Early childcare 17%
Action Items- Conduct weekly calls with Kim Brussow, Drive more traffic to
Discovervail.com, Increase lodging participation with retail value ads, Help drive
visitors to the Welcome centers, create new monthly lodging newsletter
• Town of Vail Updates
Prima Vail Leadership Forum – last night was awesome
You are all invited to the Vail Town Council meeting on the 21st
We are at the end of the event season we had a busy weekend with gourmet on the
Gore and the duck race.
Octoberfest was one of the busiest highline as seen.
Very successful, very busy event season
2021- beginning of winter
October 19, 2021 - Page 147 of 150
2022 – just published the event funding, we are asking for something more
measurable, sponsorship
• Other Business
We will move meetings back to the 3rd Thursday AM in October (21st)
lV. MINUTES
VLMDAC August 18th and August 30th Minute Approval by Erica / second by Jana /
unanimous
Adjournment
Motion to adjourn by Jana / second by Scott / unanimous 10:12am
Upcoming Meetings:
VLMDAC Monthly Meeting Wednesday, October 21, 2021
Vail Town Council Chambers
/Virtual Via Zoom
October 19, 2021 - Page 148 of 150
VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO
I T E M /T O P I C: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b)(e) - to receive legal
advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a negotiating strategy and
instruct negotiators, regarding a) F irst Amendment to Solaris Development Agreement, between
the Town and Crossroads E ast One, L L C, dated September 1, 2020; and b) Residences at Main
Vail Development Agreement between the Town of Vail and Triumph Development
P RE S E NT E R(S ): Matt Mire, Town Attorney
October 19, 2021 - Page 149 of 150
VA I L TO W N C O UNC I L A G E ND A ME MO
I T E M /T O P I C: Recess 5:00 pm (estimate)
October 19, 2021 - Page 150 of 150