HomeMy WebLinkAboutLodge at Vail COMMON 1979-1982Nc')c\v r..(\.o v.oN @ot\tf).oC\ro c\(r)o.F\o.(\lN .fF..o|r)o.ro @o.(f).o o..(.N .C\.olr)c!c-)o'N Ff\cO .OO- O-.oo-roN
.o
.o
rr)
I Y I I C\o.I I (\l.o1r)
C\
It\
{
cto.o.
@(9 .o
o's.o
O.q N
o'
lq
1..o.
N
ct
c{
@
6
s
i,st
l--
>- o.-o F\
FN
CO .Oc! o'
(\lo.
(\l
o.<r
|r,
ot
ro
.f
c\tf..
.o
o.o
ro
.oc\
rr)
Nr..(!C'
f..
o'.oN
|r)
c\|
C\
oo.!'
.q
ro.oN
(\l
I I OO.O (\
.o
I
I
I
Io)l
3l
I
'6t
El
rl,-lololLl
+l-l
I
o)
;
.s
:
I
oo
r!.
a,r- I
o)
=c
=I
oo
u-
(7)
o)
='o
II
ILI
-lrJ- |
YI
;
.;
=
€
t-oo;l-l
+l
I
o
o
u-
s
C
=
=c
<l
I
u-l
I
rr)l
o
-J
oo
u-
lo
o)
;
-a
z
I
oo)I6l ll-
t-
lJ-
c\t
oo
LL
c,
-t
x
u-
(.)
(,
E
tu
o
u-
gl
b-ElOr! |ii -l&l
Frl**l| :l
-N- |ot.- olLL- |E ol.5il
c').o.qO!lr)'q
.o
F.9-!O
!fI-
(-)
.o(r)
C\r
Tr)
c9o
5<
c!
.o
ro
J
F
F
a\..t
Hlnos rccolllvn lv tccot 3Hi.
('c\loo'; cct+d=r{ nt' 6I lFl} OP EC o-+ :ru oD -o--o<- oro F*\ J (\J! "* 3d f E <-
I(t-'--\?'
/t'l/,,rl/HN'
nJu/
oult.ozoz
J
.o
o2zo
tNlro:
i-\il
Iz
=o
z
)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Gulz-o
uJ.
Foz{
r!Ju,
EI
or|.
o
o
Fz
o
|rtuz3o
ILo
uJ(r
z
\
,l
o.
of
0)
"c
c)
-o(6r
.9
q
c{'3Y,o \-/F,6-\E-
oo@'o
qlctror,
0)
o
!,
oolJoo
o)c6'3
d)
E
o
=cf
ooo.
o,o.
3.g
o)
--- o c
=0)ur;i*XsnEUb,/i
F.9 R€*tgeF'= I c
CUP:OC:-o>e:5i
: EE:
c966
-*io): C'; Co o >'=
E EAREtEoI€ S:
3 eeP
$!Ee. o.({ o.-sEagoi6-qrs*e€
H,:REE.E Hq)N:-
EEFs-- o.Y o
--cP(! 0'-.=r:; tD /)
ar O i.9
8E5€e; Bo5()>'-9 (g E--6tFFe
iE ;:9Eo.
iE$E
aLIJ
tr
=tuL
s
\
$s
h
=g.t!(L
o!
z6
=f
L
oE
ocoig
t!
z
=t!
L
aLulo
o-
2
t|J
aluuJll-F
=
UJ(L
J
FoFNOIIVNlVA
g
ulE
z
Eoo
z
tr
(rt!t^-
illJz
\
f\rt
ua
J
{
'IFI
Ufi
t
.3zzuo ootr - 62q 5 :9c I of,
aoEZ!Oo()nozXr!<oq iH6 C
=R 2
dotO
Ed63 l dH2 g=d.1<gFvg;5s5o('olz
oz!?i
v<dq.f3r\Ct#Emo>oozOf,
otr
t!d)
z
zoF
C)()
z
tr
v>z
t!
J
?
olz:l
olul:f
al>l
rLlolzl3lpl
I
I
I
rl
vl,tl
\rll
\NI
'/11'l'l
=lrlt
.ilzl
ol
Hl
al>l
r|-|ol
zlil
-t
I
I
I
I
.l
;lGlJl
al>l
hl
1t,ol uJFIF
tJ.,
0
s
J
<
F
'dil,lrltl
rJl
3l
)rl\u
lltdatlttfil6l
"l -lr"t I?l olYt zl
,l gl
ul alrsl >l
-J ll-l
421
=l 3lGt oltrl Fl
I
I
\]l$lal\
Iol.l
Et
JI<l
dzl]lpl
!i
F.\]\J
\rl
$
sl
crtr
{J\J
'-..iz
z
-1
t-+
:c
J
!:(J
oz
J
oF()
cF
o
z
-r
Qtu
EngX
.!EOz
(J
Jt<oC)F;()
5eu1zfioo
()ozj-;c)
=f'F-tzc6
t-()
LL't:
:E
x
<F
uJ<zctUJF<52
O
E
Lr"Jz5
oz
b
=(rul(L
i
z
,rt 9z2(Dc)Ezl:)JOLU.
.^i6
=riY ?r r
aHE
mnD
t
t!
ItoP tttE2E<9Ecr->ovtr
€o-
tr :JF::uJ-E h=c''o.tr
: :(LY ou-E 9'oI \ tr.r5 6gh nr-
=
UJ(o
F
:r.;aara
\-or{rl(:)
lrJ
tsa(oo.2
zo
F
uJvuclot-
=Elrlc*"J" ccla -'lo -11oplrl
ttl
.: L-LJzo
b
E
0atl.lo-zol-(.)f
E,Fazo()
a
F{rl{>)
LrJ
ts(t,oo')zoFculY
uJd)
oFF
G
IJJc
* crlrJ@
rl
^Fl=FlOo
t-lI
=Eu.tqltoEqE<clf€8a9EA
EEE dEE FE; =oE 8bE =HE ;Ia u.l€i
ul.ooF
I-r
E
=Elrto-zIF(J
-i
E,
6zoo
HHzo
Elan
zo9zedlo
=zlfd8
EEia;3
Eatr ';
!I
c
ozt
=GllJc r.o
ootr)
(f,
ro
<\'
(n
IJJuJlJ-t
=GuJc
)w ;f:;,t!,5 I
I
$\-.|uTt.<o'o
I
I
.i
Nu
\!(,1,s
I
Il|lJ.Fl<r6
I
I
I
rg
rEc
IEz
tE
t:,zlo
(Fo
o
Po
!+)u,
o
!
(g
L6o
(Fo
o!o
(l.,L
,inulFozoz6Jf@
.6
o
=zo
oo
o-c
o
.o6
=
F\oq
o
or:looc(oEEb.
Q)E
o
E
(g
q)Eoo
CD
.EI
lo
E
o
=l
Eo
o
o,o.6
3.9
o
.o'':
-o
o
1lc6
o)
.E
oN
-q,c+o\F
o.c
o
o,
E
ooC)(5
o
o
at,
.9.c
=ll
o
.ti
'6
E:9E6g'=Oo
g8E
eoatt9; IEgrc-.= 6F5C
E8Etr-o
e:5
=eicPd'- o'€
EEE
E E-s9OO
st;gi Eo.(5 o-sEEq)PlE*e
E6:EE Eg 6-6
FFE_Eg
eeC,(! o'-.c= o+, ..c
$EEE3;.o(E=c-=
ifis9Eo€Eg
-o6
c
C\rc
r.r)(\I
(o
F\
oI
LO
(f)
Oc>
a.)
oO
l.i
oIora)(\l
\
rf,\
(f)sftO
F
=g
uJc
=o
-J
-()
UJIoz
o-
J
IEFouJ)
UJ
(,z
:
oz
auj
ulu,lltzo
F
uJe()ulE
o6
'g
UJEzIv,uJo
al,
o-uJoo-
z
IJJJ
x
F
UJol
U'uJtfllt
EEG,uJoJ
FOiF
oz6j
o
I
Fc)qJ
UJ
('z6
=lJo-
J
9z
olr,
=
NOtrvn'lYA
..cIE
E'13E!oc2'to1trco.+Ec().F
ul
<UE=
fr
-'\=>c
q=\... 6
=J* N
=(Ot\l
zzooF^U'q5F90oo5ba)zr!<oqltl t:9UFO
-;ni
.d
aa
,tJ
oI(F
z9F
|-
cto
4
o
uJc.
F
o
o
$l(\l
cE
u,E
z
Eo
z
;<'
uJ)
;uJz
lIl
=27 9=; E Fief e
=sPg8Be s<aocrfItl
2 2, Hg g =-o-]iE iEiIE E5oo()12
z9F
J
a,l>z
lu
J
E
F
ul
(,
,'i
ulJqJ
oo3
J
a
alJz:<slIF
Fl
I
lr|
F
2F*bil8
uJ
(,z
l!
I
Jo
FoJ
{,o
aoL+,
lrl
r1'E
oa
L(t
an
(lJ.Yo
=ui
=z
dlo-!
u]
=z
tattuJ
o
J
=
o.
F6 =cl!
thUJE
o
=
c
F
+iI
q
C.t
5-lo
:l
.4
oz
ol!E'
ll.o
21
=9lF1 =tr
o
c,u.l
1
t!oz3loF c
oz
ol!(E
ltoz
=oF Etr
oz
ourEJ
ltoz3oF g
o
out
1l
<i>it!lol
z13lolF]
lltJulF
ulz
=o
FC)uJ
=
C)
E
-lO<FtotJ.r <ztuj F.oz.,
C)
JT<o()F
-<RtXF
-d6IO
z
co
=
d
c
t
z
:.)
dE
=3g=
=g
E
E',
=*EOz<c)
-
I
il
tl
9't-
=r.E'
IJJo-
<>
{,..C\I
U'Iu
IJ.JLL
E
=EIIJo-
I
I
,ll.{r.!:|
:";
-.-tH
'6
l
I
I
l_
IEt6
I
II
I
IEdrFtazt=to
lotz
,7
q-o
P
L1JIA
o(J
OC
H'69r.
Olfzq'5
5_lo'cJ
o6=ro9
=fr6r
I
I
I
I
F
I'
le
r.uz3o
ultF
z
ct
o
Iq)
€. ,.9.o
6'-\_
;'o\.F'.o) '\
E
tn. )o'O 'r
or.c9.o,l
o\
oEc.E
o)
o
C)o
I
o
E
=f
!
o
o.od
=.9
o
---oc6 ri 8.9
iH;:F.e*8EI E A
E1E5e 6 E:0'c-o>'- tt =e:5i
; si;c96F
-*Eo)35;:
E E-s:*.€s:
€cefElsecL (5 cL-SEisoiE-ors*e€P;66PEEH
i;Eg
--C?(ll 0'- .:.c;tD(,|
$€; EgBlE
9 6a;
if :;9Eo -
iE$E
G
$
l4
N\
N
ccl
a
U
l"f\
Do
I(\
I
T\1.
I
C)
(\
F\
clf)
").ir)
(:
::_r i)
r')
-:
:_
iv)
.-')
F
LUo-
zo!
d)
Y
qJ
oz
Jo-
-
u.i.J
TIJ
z6
=l
o-
z
IouJ
=
r|JUJt!z
tr
uJ
ut
=UJ
uJ
z
F6
(Lt!oc
z
IJJo
x
F
IUol
U'uJ
UJILF
=uJ(L
J
FoF
z
J
c)
J
9
F
tll)
UJ
zo
=J
.J
2-(-)
uJ
=
NOIIVN'IVA
.F
C
o<
E
I
+
(
aP
Y
;It
z
F
anuJ
e,uJzuJ
-,-- r Gl
\=J lr,l ci
=l!N
zz9oF^an95890aO
=f,.c)zL<og"98
FO
>E
.t:
tA
P
(F
z
E)
tr-oo
o-
uJd
F
,::'
{\,
uJ
J
z
Eo
z
F
UJFJ
3tuz
||tl) rll
= .2
:EE, T H
=BE
gEH:g<d]olI|llrtrrl
,^dtda5 < E?2 E=d
=<E iEgEE H3ooorz
z.IF
J:)(.f)z
lu
?
F
LU'r
oUJJlu
o
o3
LIJzx9
F
Id
(L
2X<ux-odiE
UJ
L
q
.D
,j
\
vJ
uJFoooazo
F(L
UJY
ulc0
oFF
=TE
UJ
ILo
o-oo
I
utFoz
'ts
=E
lrJo-z9F()
:)
E,Fazo(J
uJF
o
i{
z
,aoz4d)0
=zffJOCL TL
Etr!
J.^i6zizQf-r
-r -'i t!6E=
trgtr
rF,=
UJ0-
oPUt59E<c!f6V)Eoe9lrk
cf,E iltE FEx >o-]} oLE 909 \srE XO-E fTa'io=IJE
,IIJ
@
---i
=.1oltltl
5l<l>l
zl
cilull
5l
<l>lEI
:l3lolFI
ol
=.1olutl
1lal>lEIq
zl
3lolFI
=l(rl
uJl
5l<l>I
blzl3lolH
I
I
I
I
cil
=.1olujl
5l
<l>l
tr.lol
=l
sOl |llFI F
(Jz
Jtr
{t)
r!L+J
IJJ
{l
L
td
o.v,
E
u;
z
(Do-)
I
ILl'
I
Afl
Ed<l:ll<=E()
l
ILl"
I
I
Ia
frl
ct<lj
Ec)
-,r O<F
r.! <zE.L!F(nZ
F(J
Fzo()
z
-
UJ
EI]
\JZ
UJ
T
Y,
rr,rsffirtoNTOWN OF/tt
REOUEST.
VAIL
sa1g ,'/* .tl' -i/1- JoB NAME 'f:t -t - {
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI AM PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
FOOTINGS / STEEL tr UNDERGROUND
FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V
FRAMING tr ROUGH/WATER
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING T] GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP, POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT r] SUPPLY AIR
tr
FINAL tr FINAL
..qAPPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE ,',,i ( -:/2.INSPECTOR
-
JOB NAME
INSPECTION REQUEST
i-- L) .
TpwN'\:'^(*
VAIL
t._ I'DATE
INSPECTION: . MOI.I\(;/
l- t ,-r. 4
CALLER
TUES THUR FRI A'lrrr , pnrWED----/READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
N FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE.
tr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
OVED
,, CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
rNstiron-TOWN OF
REOUEST.tratl
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION:MON TUES WED i THUR FRI
JOB
./. \AM r PM,r
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr INSULATION
-
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
n
tr Flr*AL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
tr ROUGH
tr CONDUIT
n
tr FINAL
PLUMBING:
_ tr UNDERGROUND
- tr ROUGH/D.W.V.
N FIC,I IGH / WATFR
- tr GAS PIPING
- tr POOL / H. TUB
n
n
_ tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
- tr HEATING
_ C] EXHAUST HOODS
_ tr SUPPLY AIR
-
o
O FINAL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER' PLYWOOD NAILING
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
rNs#ItoN neouisr.
CALLER
TUES
i/.iDATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MoN 'r
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr
tr
tr
tr
u
u
r-l
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V,
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
r-., ROOF & SHEEH" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr_
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr
tr
r'l
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
n_
SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPBOVED tr DISAPPROVED :REINSPECTION REQUIRED
{DATE INSPECTOR
I
INSPECTION
,I, \ r i,/, -x !ojo**toj
REOUEST
VAIL
(r,
AM
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:TUES @ THUR
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
FRI
BUILDING: PLUMBING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL tr UNDERGROUND
-
s rouNi'bnrroru l srEei tr RoucH / D.w.v.
O FHAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
. 83,,ff"%tJfiilr,*o tr GAS PTPTNG
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
.tr F|NAL n FTNAL ?,
ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: .i'x
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
IA ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
B CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIB
-
trtr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
(APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
oor= /(''- .l - f2- tlspEcroR
ta
J'/,.,,, ., f .,
REOUESi
VAIL
\t
,"r#troNTOWN OF
.t.DATE JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:TUES WED THUR FRI AM, PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
cl
tr
tr
tr
n
UMBING:
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
!: sneernocK NAIL
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
TTIECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr
tr
r'l
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
tr
SUPPLY AIR
nflFet tr FINAL
f,$eeaoveo tr DISAPPROVED r] REINSPECTION REOUIRED
' 'conRecloNS:
DATE INSPECTOR
'Ns#eroNTOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
FRAMING F ROUGH / WATER
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POO L/H.TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
cl
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:MEGHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
a rt{au tr FINAL
,-/E APPROVED
, CORRECTIONS:
E DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
-.a' '
DATE INSPECTOR
rNsf,lrior,r REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
t.,l,lii,i t. i i ! i ..,'JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
CALLER/'MON ITUES j
-/
,{y;READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
N ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
tr INSULATION O GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL O POOL / H. TUB
tr o
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr_tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
COBRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
oz
tr
=EuJo-
t.f)(\l
r.clu)
atlljIut!
tr
=EuJo-
Y8lElqt-+)n'zrry
\P O/"*tN
..1s
,{i5
t$,
N$l\r
\dlv
I
Jt-,.\,<ldlo\Jtr\tB\ Dr-z
r5
I
l_
.Ft<ro
I
I
I
I
l*,oIFt<
l6z
t=
t:,zlo
oIIJ
ozozoJl(o
.1,a
=zo
j-oc6*8.9
aEE:
.;E gE
E.= qt -
=1.:O€ EE:g
:$E ig >= Xc9dFIoSoBE'=
E E-s;
gE gi
.t-; e-g
SEae
€Eig
E6:F
EEEg
- o..!l o
(60'-!<; o ('
sE ii
P 3lo5
;A;E
TE$E
{
c rr)N
rorr)OO
oo
O
lr)(\I
(r)o)C\I
E
=G,UJ
(,z
J
co
I
C)utIo2
o-
I
F
uJJul
zto
=Jo-
)
()z
LU
]Uutl!z
tr
uJ
uJ
oE
oao
=g
UJcz
d
o
a
AllJ
2
urJo
x
F
uJo
(t)
lrJullJ-F
=E,tlJ
FoF
zo
Ic,FC'UI
ltl
oz
an
=Jo-
9z
Eou,l
=
NO[Vn'lVA
EF
=lJ- -o=
6'dlrc
=lEGC
fle
-1I<LEd:
2-
U
=>E
\=J,.-r! -N
zz9o8s 9F90ao<>E9r!<oquj :<gUFO.j<\i
iF
zo
F
Eoah
uJ
F
rft(\l
rJ)lr)
cuJ
:
.J
z
Eo
z
tr
uJFJ
;t!z
l|tl
"llll
= .^ze
=
xAef S
=sE
g
8Se:<roof||lrttrl
?7-t43 < rHg g =-o,=iE iEie3 H3ooo-z
z
tr
J
a,l,z
UJ
J
?
F
lllI
\
o
C)uJ
lu
oo
3
E
J
o
luzY9
GI
Ico
E
IUo-
F
Fibil8
UJ
;lfItcfr-{(to
uJF
@oo-zo
Fo.ulY
UJctoF
F
=tUJo.3lI c.,l
(-) =l\., (7) |r\lr€lgur
i^F\Jzo
z
oPz_zoo
=z3>dP
:f;;:XOA;E
tr
G,ulo.
l!o
Luoz
lU'I
F
CEIEo.
JFu.t :h=dfi:o-O|!9o\ IJJxo-:>IJFllrJJtr
l!@oF
I--
E
=Elrlo-zIFofEF(nzoo
n!tr
(,
=J
lJ-
rd
.tJ(6
(U
E'
J
i'i
=z
CD
-)
ol
=.1(t
rl
<l>l
t!lqzl3lotFI
=.1olurlclJI
BloFI
I
I
I
I
Iolzl
FlJI<l>lttlolil gol urFI F
tllltl
-tl+lli
'-lloot IBt Iqlct Iql
hl dct u,{El1qfld=
lltl
sl Itl c;lorl zl
sl 5|lilloltzl>t 3lHPI
trlolzl3lolFI
E-rO<FCO[!<zEIIJ F(42o()
EF()
uJ
6
29
s3
d3
ot'-o
Fzoo
Et.'9X
Ft-o2
o
-
FtE
t
EDN
:l
I
oz
E
=Eluo-
{
r4
tt
uJ
LUlJ-
==EIJJ(L
'l : ',,! ' .'. ,, i
'.. ." ) ,! ;, .': j.
I
I
I
I
I
ti
':I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t.
lr
ti
ri
ti
t:
IJ
j
5b
I
l,.,
.Fl<td
I
I
I
I
I,
IE
rF| <ltzl=lo
le_,zt9
ulF
z
z
=
{
=z
t\
^li\,t\
a
e
:
It\rt
i\\r'\-
N
lMrl\'
lnt\lLL
F-
-.i - o c l+oti ct.:' |uJair$; l3
;*Eei ll
E$EEF;IE:E;E! lg
iEElt]gI
;*iir$'.
!EE; r
- +. r- /E ii!=-c;E'i
gEiES I
iBaiit
a
\
o
5'')
))
):
-).'l
)_j,t
v
=uJ
z
J-o
x
UJ
oz
J
F
UJLU
z
co
=
E
z
lu
ultulJ-z
EuJ
IJJ
E
=uJ>uJ
z
-u)UJ
F
l,!
C
z
uJ)(J
x
F
utof
U'trJull!
==
UJ
=oF
zoJ
oEF
u.l
uJ
z
=J
J
z
IollJ
=
NO[Vn'lVA
I
I
It-
l'-| '.4
- lI{ lo-N\ l>
YAgr
3Z u-..o oEatt Z\-I Ou:6 Fc
=,!EAax
AUE1)yc
uJ
=>tr
z
h.
iotrGaO
9(Ja)zrL<oq
o-HiE
I
ItrlL,to
ifE
I ':,
,l$,t ^rlo
't'r-lr.'.1lI':I(J
IEl-
iF rq*,
ah
z
E
Fl!
o-
E
lrlo-
F
o.:\Ir')Ln
g
o-uJ
J
z
E
z
E
UJF
3UJz
Z ^z=e
= E,aa8sI P
=gE 5883 ?<a0()fIlrlrttrl
,^6;:>'- (t :'l5 < [?2 e=d.joE !EuJ+5Ot!;CoEoooorz
z
tr
J
az
UJ
?
F
llJ-r
()qj
tIJ
o
3
(r
6
uJzY
=
C\,
I
cc!
LE
UJ
2FfBJIPlu
-f:,I}
--i
UJ
tsooo-zo
Fo-
IJJY
1!o
oF"tt
Elll()-
t!lol> .,1o-.il8#| :)lgu,bEzo
z
..! YzecoO
=z=rf
ifi
2"ra
aH=
tr
ut
t!outoz
U'IoF
CE
Eo-
JFtu-h=AE,E r.!>o-O|!9o5uJ
:>lu'
=tr
uJ.?.ooF
co
Eoo
ct
eal
iE-,tE
E
8
o
io
E
oIT'--
E
=Elrlo-zo
F(JfEFazo()
trntr
ql
<lilol2l3tpl
FI
ol
=.1olrul
5l<l>lu.lolzl3lolFI
I
I
I
I
I
"l=.1olu.ll
5lal>lttlol
5l gol rJJFI F
I
Ilil^
I
IIu\Lt4
olol<lj
EO
tlttIIllll-tlJt t?LI IEol I
4Jl I
clt I
-tlF'l "JEt fl!l ql*l Ht<>t J
=l
g5
ol-l
oluJl
1lal>l
ar-lolzl3l9lr-l
.{J
s7
<J
OJ
=E
ll.
I
.l
=.1ol
uJl
5l
al>ltI.lolzl3l9lz
=l!
f7
Pal
tttr
J
u;
=zo
-)
t
di,
=
\JZ
EoF()
zoO
J
9
F
uJJ
>Y
=E)z(r-O
oF
t
z
9z
r
Lu
=
tr
<F(r(JuJ<ze.
I,IJ F(42uJJ
tr!n
'N$fcnoN REduE$r,TOWN OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MON TUES THUR, FRI - Afi-
j:er,,r,
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
tr
tr
tr
tr
u
FRAMING
BOOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr
tr
tr
n
GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
E FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH
tr CONDU
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
n
a rt$ft tr FINAL
'gy'aeeeoveo T] DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
, CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
rNsilcroN neouibr*TOWN OF VAIL! . i,oarc L/ 3o /f>//
READY FOR INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
CALLER
TUES
LOCATION:
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL/H,TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
oare 7 /"- f{* rNSPEcroR
r|.Jtu
Ii
Got\
lEoFo.(
GFzo()
co
0cutz
odtr u,o3
6ioIutFI.(F
6e
U,<
?t'- dl (:
li ri i,i sl .':t S1 '" ii I
urH:$
curolPt
€sHI*s:E 5.U
€*B:E$
E;F:S
=
sr;3:€cFe'- O-C -!F:i i';
!Ea: e
5E;FE
.:* ls€o=*o"(u: o!rt
: fiEE$
:E.g gB
i. i! 9€
:s€s;
.c= o (/r tr
--ar!tr,Oi'FsEE
* e lel-P:EN9.*6F996Buo&
a'ie€s
IE$8s
I
I
I
l_
t:i
II
I
,in
UJFozoz6I:)(D
€oz
oF
FI
=
z7o
F
g)
(-t
F...)
Gl,-
oa)
<-)
.t
Itl
.a
L'lcZts-
-a f.
(L()
(J
-r rc-(Oc) t-;,: l)i:: <
I !-J- ', -
--'
-rO<( l-(r. (.)t', <
tJ, l--(! '".()()
Ltrz
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
llr,.(lo
I
I
I
I
I
I
l-
rd
IE
r3
rE
'l
Lr)
.--lc)
v.-l€cf tnul
UJt.t.
E:
Lrlo-
o
F
lll
rJo
o
t:
=
;
uJ
tutr.t)dt.o-)zo
FLLirlv
!ll
Ft
at
UJo-
ll-o :A\c):
rLoz9Fo-
Go
ulo
J
tuz
u,F
o
z
F^
tnoz>ooQZt!<oo-.., li-(J;()FO..: <ri
t
!t
N
z
a
I
ul
F-oz
1
oz
uJ
=.(
o
7-
t-
I
I
I
I
I
l
=.1(9llul
:l--l>l
bl
7-l
14
z
.rPzz60EZf:)JO(L TL
2**ofi::
;H!
tsEcculGtl.o
I,lJoz
f,oIoF.
ccIE
)Ft!-h>
o- t.Ll:: o-
oo
\UJxo-:>-.) t-Ut'-tJl!
tuf,loF
c
o
:r
'rJ
:.1t:
E()
a)
h
f-r
LJtL
6',dO
t--()n
t--tfi"i,
C)()
r-
J'lt:
uat')
nfln
Vat-(-,.(
()()
\>t
u;
.(
:;I
(i
lr)
t/,UJulLLb
t!,c
-J
FoF
-
:ro
.{J
(Jz
F
o
r(trt
o?-x
r(
tu
UJ
ooz
Fdni rp?=d<3 !E+:s(,lr-C 6 iioo0():Ez
oc
!(oOJ
6
o
=x
UJ
G:tll
oo
r.lJ
Fr((!
ulE
I
tnLzfoz
JJl!
=o
z
F.(
wF
3
z
.{o:
o
zIF
Jf,az
t- j.t,..5*LntaanA'
LllL l
l
I rlJiu
i(ro
rtoF().(
.EFzoo
G0
tuzIodrLuto<
;:o3g
<F
=o=<,{,'<
Egliiic
usH),$c .eJ cr jl !
*sHs*s:e 3.u
€EE:gE
:EiiE:9IEE
: sE 3lxEins
Er !F€
ai5:€
:*sgg
IEr lP
:gEEHc, O'- i r.c=c)Urc
e*Et€
+erclo('=;oc-=->*;E:A
!F$i€
\!-tr).-lcf
Y{.J
Cf $.
u)tr,tI'rl.
F.
LUo-
o
otrlFozozdJ:l
CO
.0
o
=zoN
uJF
F
Gul al,ulttlLLb
t!
FoF
E-S
o-
:.n|;:
:-
")zo
Fa-u:a
tll
rlC
oFt
=ulo-*l\JI
u-Iololrl'Igiubkzo
t',iortvnlv^
z
F_.{)=>c
-r!,Iu.rS
=coor
zzootr-6q5F90t^Oz>-oo<)zrL<o*ut-o-Y-6
;c.i
E
G
H ------
r,.-.-___J6 ?'--lP U,g? ,,6sa
=v(l-
;:: ]- 1 :); 5 iei $,.,Dnr:
'-: ut -lli h=l Jir dftl i*; g EI :Ei
ii n El ;HIjj # nrtL I
it,,.@ oF
;to
=oz9Fo-
Eoal,wo
t!zt!o
I.l
I
I
I
II
t1cta.alId
hc-r.:l:if:-
1,:JfL
6nc)
l-(J.:3
!.lri-fv?'-:'
(.)
()
oz
';atJ
r(
oz
o.
(.1
c.
:c
a)
t
ul-tt,lF
<)Fa)
ft.
C)(J
C)Ft)-t
tr-
':-
a)
r., oZts-iq:: .{
-.. cclt-
o. r'1(J
-Jrr-( Cl(_) l-;:: ()ttr$
-t ().t l-(t <)U'<
U,I F.A 2'.()
tr/
z
Lt,z
o
Il*
n;r:
z
-z
-tg
(i
gt!4.
= i rH2 e=d.i*=gEoootz
Elrl 313glfiluls
El Sl ol l
z9).-=6 = E
;cgg
slilil6lil"d
N'@q,
IJa
C\f
I
fiiX4-\-=)(l
iNl\lZd e-.z
-{(,
t o-4
tqL I
ir$
{o(ut
' Cl ulnl a- f)Uul
zIt--
./t
lr I
tJ
l'"t
l'W2 ,279 Dg!-1sl\l O? ,,ot-,ol
+-I
\-l
_{
=
rt)
E@
bJ$
M
\r
,rtj d-t- -/
-r F{0
7.
\)/
i- d-z\
44+il$F
1-- >
Z- bJ
I
d
IL
.l
ll.
:
Jrf
-zF
dl
J(1ir
3ilo
q$z:
ht
Xr.tii
i$
-J)
K'\I
o
*ti
9
?
I\-({$i3,
\fr-i/tr.ihI :-
SD
l-.t"Ildr
(\l@O)
rn6l
-
I
tl
-t\t+
$
{
',9\
v
r.l
-7.
v
al=c$x:*-l
f_J
K'rlil(],
rJ19 S,h6 IvrJ ul/- TrJo ${d
o
0(
:
.J
ti\
.)
(Jtdqs{=rl ot{.hF
Is:!tx\,d\l
s
-\i\
c
oofLIt-{lfJ
d
c{
)a
^l
'il
*iill
AI
ts
s
IT.|ts
IIllr€
sI
nJ
J
d-o(
:d
t
Fo!ut
I
J
s(oz{
$til
It-jr//
il
il
I
i
\-t
J
1l
C\^|@o)
Lf?
C\l
=
J--rL h,6!l\ Uqs\- tr r{. -)
)?.x1
E A'uU "llb*= ti
',*iy $iul -l -, ii r \.(\ -.J $ Piqit s:
YSH,Y K?
4 i\
,Z{<"r
FS.J) :
1_{
ru t!
\rl 5 "') -; .,1< L-^i;:- .rl
) -<.ul -l J(<s
T\-
$N
'J*z\t\
i
-tv11.-,,Jv5:rel!t v
T\lrl
ulI\i
\
7_t
:l
Xd
{
.\tiA
"JF
({z
\\J
1t
vd
'rLr9
cl 1llJ \
- l!t '+dl
qL!.t Fl'' JIi]Ys-uFF..\ u.I
a\ r'l\<
)
I
()-1or f -
llc" ''3
tt
H
J
{
1---- \11a 4@Y
---].-.-------_--_-
1\
oO
oz
F
=g,
uJo-
oo|,l
or(\l
r-{
ooro
U'lrJull.!
ts
=ttuc
ry:#str'gl ,
)
I
I
I
I
.t
\=
\.x'
I
I
I
"dr\,
I \1,\\
\ttf
s
I
I
I
l_
t3
I
I
I
I
lo,
t<
l-ez
IE
t?,zlo
u.l
Fo2o
=oI
o
.a(,2zo
ttJuJo
=I
i\\$s(5 \NgN
=\?\aLI\
€\ll
o9{
FN
gSES
.9tnoE
lioEoog
.9.o.zE.oJ
<toc,6
o)c
oN
AD
F(,-c
o
gt
.s
Po
at!
o
a
o
.g>G
=Jlt
o
E
(t
ai
'(rt
E .gE6s'=9o
gEE
Etg
ETEc-o
ei5
=gF€ >=c96.- CLE
3Ei
=u E-F.FOOj= oeieE:E
CLG cLSEi
at r, o-E*eE6:
E E.Eg o-6
FFE_Ee!|, E6 0'-t=o
E't=
sg1P:E
E; E
ai:
PEg
-o6
oo
@or')otm
o
rr,(?)
U V
o rJ)
r\
ro
lr')
r\to
E
=EllJcoz6J
l@
:<oul
C)z
o-
9
UJ
uJ
oz
=l
o-
9z
ouJ
uluJu-zo
F
u.l
u,le,
oc
oco3g
uJ
z
6
UJ
F
I
UJo
o.
z
UJJo
x
F
IJJol
an
UJ
UJl!hEe.
IJJo-J
FoF
(9z
J
.D
I
6UJJuJ
oz
=
I
-9z
oul
=
NOtM'M
{l.rl.sl
\\l\-1.:-;g
orE39Z !->o ctF; > ttt= =.uZ =v,
FAatoUJO
3g
E||j('
\)6
-.< E9;
z
EsE9.DO5Boz.r!<o*
EE
z9F
Eo
G
o
UJo-
F
oorJ)
o)(\I
e
IJJ
z
Eoo
R
z9F
E
UJF
3uJz
JIl42i
=
xBgf E
=gE58eB:<@oftltrlrttrl
?3,a3 a rH2 Ez-diiE iEgTEHSo(,orz
zo
J-
Jf,atz
rl,
J
?
F
uJ-
z.
cttrlJIIJ
oo3
luzY9
F z.
r-lIE F
J
*<t!x=odiE
uJ
eoOor{oO
GI
I(0(\I
I
tllF
o
uJF
at,oo-zo
F(L
uJY
ulo
ot-
F
=E
lrJ(L
ll-o
o.oo
lrJFoz
!!!
z
.rPzeoo
=<dP
EE3B;3
E
=.Euto-tt
EHE<lLl€aE9EA
.=E:tE ilEE 5E: >o-; 8E9 trurE Xo-H ;Taulo-i!tr
ull0oF
E
=E
lrJG2Il.r(,fEFazoo
i
a
E
z
J
II
I
I
JJco
FoJ
tU
.tJ
ct
oulEoJI!
r5{Jtt)
-o
oJ
i.i
=zo
-)
UJ
z
uJEoo
J
=
-o-
ts
E
G
(t
llJ
=
Fo
o
Po
L+,vl
oc)
L@E
-
=tr
o
0ul
=a
\rl
zl3l0lFI tr
z
qt
ul(r
ltoz3oF =tr
oz
duJ
G.Ja
ltoz
=oF
:
G
oz
ci
uJtcJ
tto23o tr
oz
dl!
J
t!oz3oF
ul
uJF
UJz
=o
FC)uJ
=I()E
E
<Fd()uJ<zEUJF6Zoo
Jt<oOF
FE
=F-zj8
9F
33]Fd6(J
-t tv<x9tr
13AFiz
=8
tr
G iruJ
*E Fo2<()ftE-a
dz
tr
=E
UJo-
::)
e.j
rft
U'uluJlJ-t
=E
IJ.Jo-
,I
r\l
l-1-
._t6-'1g
.l(5.tzi. lq
-'.,f
I
I
' lr.t,Ft<ro
I
I
I
l-
IFt<
rFl9zt=
lotz,zlo
N\
Iv\
N
oPro:zF
2:l
Oc.\J\5L
.Dsz\zo
I
h
lEIIt\Il(-
I
I
I
I
IF
I
EuJz3o
utI
l-
tl!IJIl!s. tE9'r l=0^\ l-5\\ tb*\+;6 Jtgo J tt:
R.:-;li:N=
n $lg|1- v\|6t*-{rE)=o r\Os\bCt r:lUJ\C .rl CEE\$ih\ 'fE5\ tao..E t'.-
(|E.:or \S!to \:.o '\.:ol ..\tr \,-.-.
!t -i
=6'r..'l
EE}.
l
oo \',o.-
o-:(!
3r.-,(D -:.>to(:
oF
o.c
o
o,c
E
ooo
o
o
-9
!t
J
-o
o
E
G
!;
'(E
E .!E6g'=Ost
g8E
5: fr
EgE6s6c-o
E:E:gPd'5 =c96'- cL.c
EEE
E E-e$oo;Eo
E;Etq! i.=- 6
o-(o 0-
$EEoP o.E*pEi;!
E E.Eo ao;
EEE_ o,.!eeE6 0'-c; o- --c$€;oil
=6>9 6a
!;E
;g;916.oP5g
-('6
l1l
c)c)
a:
rn
(>
L.)(.)
a:_.c\
F-<f
(]',J
C:',Nt:>
F
=G,uJo.
z
J
ao
!
IJJ
z
9
F()tu
u.t
z
coE
.J
z
uJ
UJuJl!z
F
llJ
gJ
.D
=tl,
uJ
z
6ul
a
o-UJ
lz
qtJo
x
F
utth
anuJlljtL
tr
=E
UJ.L
-)FoF
z s2EFoujJuJ
2
!l
=J
J
oz
uJE
NO|l.Vn'lVA
Jg
9F
F5-59E5
35
*'
a
o
\-,
z
6
6
L\.
' cq.> \€)
<r-
z9bqietto6b()z!!<oqH6;oFO;$i
z
E
F
oah
o-
oEo
uJ
F
s
n,l
uJ
J
z
Eoo
z9F
EUJt-
3uJz
JIlF
=2z 2*
E, F $;= e s
EEg E<too3tltrl||rl
?9,!?3 i Eg9 gzd
!s=gEoo()rz
zoF
5U'z
Iu3J
?
F
UJI
;i
uJJql
o3
;)
6
uJzY,
iF
<{
I
.E
UJ
F
JFSbJF=
t!
c7,
C)a:--l'I
'.)
(v
U)I\tC{I<i
uJFodto-zo
Fo-
lrJY
uJ
@oFF
Gtrlo-lto
(Loo
I
tuFoz
IuF
o
trD!
z
oP
=e=zdP
:F*
-r ": tU6tr=
=HIL
EUe3€8B93i!
5T
F $E':i = o-E 8bE iHE ;I6, ulo-it,E
lu.0o
\
*"
E
=E
UJo-zoF(J3
E,Fazo(J
z
J
tl-
Jtr|
o
.p
(U
'o
JI
&t
-c)oJ
UJ
=zdl
-)
llJ
=z
!Jcoo
=
=
c
tr
ul
oo
-
=
o-
Fo
o
!{JrnG
t
=
=ttr
oz
o
uJtr
at-
z3 =tr
oz.;
l!
Ja
l!o23
F =tr
o
oul(r
J
t!oz3oF =ctr
-iz
oular
J
iozB
F
=(ts
tr
z('
UJ
E.
=
ltoz3
F
uiJuJF
uJz
=o
FOUJF
oE
-rO<F(r()LU<z.Er.! F(rzo
C)
J
ItF()ItlJ
r
t
r
t2?
E?>e.]Fd6
<^
::Fz<)
=#il<=u
t-t ir
=b2<c)trt!
I
6
bI
I
I
Itr-1 |:lrl
I
I
oz
tr
=tulo-
I
I
oz
HF
t
do
CI
(t
N
I
do(t I
0
,
I
I
l
(f,ulrlJll-
F
=EllJo-
I
I
PI\P,s
-i
I
I
lri-, llE
6 \J_s
tlli-l,{-=
l.t.+J) z
rERL?rSSi
n
JJ
z
zz
i=)<FeZt2
. =i,
. <:
x^,Jli"
2rZv.=..lFF
.)<!
:i.t
=<!i'; 2 a
c><a
c<
0
a
t;
q
\\
srv)
rh
0nU(r'v)
tv)
\)
a
\
b
\
\
.$
I
U
N
t
tr
=Eu,Goz
:
(o
!ou,
az
9
F
ul)ul
z
I
c
z
!u
=
gJ
l!2
tr
UJc
ttlE
3
2
IJ
F
o-uJoc
2
UJ
\t\lr
t-
{
6uJ!Ut].
==UJo-
J
FoF
(,z
=l
co
J
9GF(J
uJ
qJ
z
=
gz
(,lu
=
NOtrvnlv^
=B*\)
\
N
|It
It
z
tr
F
c,
(9
ltro-
F
$,
tI.l
c
uJ
z
E
o
z9F
ut
Bu,z
J||lie2E E: FesaFre
EEEE;q!llIl
F(,.^ozl.>-o=A i E F E
*EEEE;
zo
J
tnz
uJ
4e
F
UJt
ooo
=
u,ll,ll!o-
ia6z
e.uJF
B
|lJ
oz
J3oUJ
:
o3
z
tr
a()
u,
J
eltlzuJo
\r'rll' 3
-,,.tD N- o\
zz
F.o_ i<fE90U'Oz>.oot)ztt <(o(LE !.1iE.;<ri
ur2-o
F \\>
tl \
><
gJ
t!
t;
o ul
FI\
2q-Llilo
J>-=
UJ
\N
tr
lal
.rl lvrl sjg
,13
441 2F:
Jt!
tJ.;
z.
dt
,
fr€
$s
l$
J{ "t€s
H,fr
da==4=
$
*JI
.J
{
=
II
T
3qtc!
tr
{
E?<!
ulAg
,!
f;
gl
oo
J
$
Ni
J
s
F()
rrlt=l<
d4UqJtlr,dl "tl r,,
+u
dH
&<d>
q
fi
In
^n
\
aLl
B
/:
E
E,t!z3o
F
UJL?()E
-rO<F(r(JuJ<ZE,UF<rzoo
Jt<o(JF
-<
XF-,2-3
EOOzt-
=#)zo-O
(J
i5YF
13
il=
=u
{I
FEc)
H-!. dFOz<()ftfl=1
F
=E,
lrJo-
Jz
z
ur )J
=<
=zff
O- u-
zo
!- tPl-tC)E
-CL-roE,Ej-. iz'EOEoE o
t]Df,
Fkgs
o
-:e
€
!
tINSPECTION REQUEST.TOWN OF VAIL
DATE / " t1r' .=JoB NAME -t-!-:.-t--Lfr ltllL
CALLER
TUES
[- tz- 3z-
BEADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:WED THUR FBI PM
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
tr INSULATION D GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
-
tr POOL / H. TUB
EI FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIBED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR,
'/
CTION CARD
(MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SrrE)
CONTRACTORS
Gancrel Contractor:
Excevetor:
Foundetion:
Ptumber:
Electrician:
Mechanical:
Framer:
lnsu lator:
Dry Wall:
Painter:
Roofer:
i
j
.l
I
CONTRACTOR NAMES AND LICENSE NUMBER MUST BE LISTED
INSPECTIONS
^ vn'7:ouExcavation
Footings / Steel
Foundation / Steel
Ground Plumbing
Engineering (Utilities)
Temp. Electric
Rough Plumbing - D.W.V.
Rough Plumbing - Water
Rough Electric
Gas Piping
THE ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED
Rough Framing
lnsulation
Sheet Rock Nail
Exterior Stucco Wire Nailing
Final Plumbing
Final Electric
Final DRB
Fire Inspection
Final Engineering (Utilities)
Final Building
AND APPROVED BEFORE PROCEEDING
UPON FINAL APPROVAL OF ALL ABOVE INSPECTIONS, RETURN THIS CARD
TO BUILDING DEPT. FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPPANCY
$25.OO"REPLACEMENT CHARGE FOR LOST INSPECTION CARD
FOR TNSPECTTONS CALL 476-7000, EXT. 235 0R 247
24 Hours In Advance
Between 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday Through Friday
DISAPPROVED APPROV
fl
rNsiltroNTOWN OF
neouesr
VAIL
loe Neu=DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
t-- o i>L "{Fe THUR FBIMON
CALLER
TUES AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMTNG /il .o,tt('.
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr
tr
tr
tr
GAS PIPING
O INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr.,
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr
tr
n
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT
o_
SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr DISAPPBOVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
t rNsttoN REeuEsr,
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRIREADY FOR
LOCATION:
AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr BOUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FBAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
-
tr
trtr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
T] CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
trtr
O FINAL tr FINAL
. PAPPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
AM PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATER
ON / STEEL
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEER tr GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION trPO OL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr EXHAUSTtr ROUGH HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIFED
DATE INSPECTOR
o
April 29, 1982
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage RoadVail, CO 81657
Re: The Lodge at Vail - Lobby Stair
Dear Sirs:
This letter is in regard to the beam bearings for the steel stairstringers. The existing bond beam discovered in the South wall
of the lobby is a continuation of the beam which supports the twin
tees that in turn forrn the floor structure of lrlickey's Bar and can
be considered more than adequate to distribute the load of the stairstringers.
A lintel was exposed in the fireplace wall which blocked the anchor
bolts for the stringer paralleling the wall. Therefore, the bolts
were inverted to maintain their full embedment for grouting. Thislintel also blocked groutir.rg for another stringer bearing. The area
below the lintel was drilled; verifying that it was grouted duringconstrtrtion. The only grout necessary is that required for setting
the bearing plates.
The hot water heating piping which passes through the area of the
stair footing will be relocated to bypass the footing entirely.
These changes from the original drawings provide adequate supportfor the stair stringers. lf you have further questions, please call.
Ruott/Went\^/orth
AfCh iteCtS i:r s{$i{,{:#ii AA
William J. Ruoff
Kenneth S. Wentworth
Sincerely,w)Roger T. Landing
RuoffiWentworth Architects AlA, PC
ajm
rNsttoN REeuEsrTOWN OF VAIL
DATE : : JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRIREADY FOR
LOCATION:
AM PM
BUILDING:
T] FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
T] UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH /WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL cl
otr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
o
tr
HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
.O APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
F
3
(]z
:(tz
F
z
z
z
a
z
F
I-t
JFt
:Fi
<-9
.<:
!tF-a'=q:o
222z:-
:iu
;<i)i9,,
-Ftrlo><c3v,5()ZE
>ts-
TUF
F
(x
Iz
=
zz
$
I
auJ
TJJu-
E
=E,
UJIL
z6
=
E
=
tJJ
zo
ld)
z
=
UJF
z)
=()
LIJ
t!uJ
o-
Fi
oz
EllJ
3
z2
F-iilf;a F-iEe?,
= S;Es
E 3 EFaBS !oZcoe@z=
,aUrZt d ov
= < rHf2 3 =deJ<=+e.E*tEg55ooorz(J
zf,z
tr
o
:
o
z
tr
U)z
-
c
z
Eoo
z
Ec
uJFJ
;UJz
clct
q
=l
u\.4q
I
x
=Z tt-
^ 6z5 >e
E=
!(J>A*i7e.xulXz
N(,
=E
-(')ur$
(DN
\
-
e
z
tr
l
Fz
x
o-
F;
z
tr
l
Id4r-t
. -l:la
I
I
ozt
=tuJo-
oz
FollJ-)
Eo-
o-zIFof
E,Fazo()
,,(----\,/ \..?\/ ,._ dt-\ /IF\ l/ ts-\\ -// tE-'<_-1..J E-F'
t'
IlrI
4.6
UJF
o
Jz
z
.n =zed)0
=z
O- tL
ix(9(J=
="*3dd=
Llutr
Kr!k
F
=
LlJ
u-o
o
F
{,
o
C!
oE
c
Eot)
o
{,
E
oclo!a
I
-
I
I
I
Iol
,Elolol-l
+)lLlQ)l aoJ /)xl Hul 6lol<>l :Gl <trt >
@lu.JlEI
otjl
<l>l
tltltlI|ltltl,lt3ltdltoltolt<l>l Jlcl =ltrl=t
tltltlltlll-l| (tl,I LrJllEl
tdtsglq<trt >l
oo
I
IL
l-
I
.,lfl
ooJ><==o
uJto
z
Jtr
rtsooLI(uE
(o
+,rE
(U
LU
=z
(D
s6
=i-b2
z
"t_
ulE
(.,oZr-;#)zLLO
)E<oC)F
-<
Ltl,2ilo
<F
uJ<zEtuFtrz
O
J<Oo?,lo
z
L
uJ
L Li L;
aa.- r-
.= - ? - -C\-13':
. < - /.i
.' =
L - - t.V-. *.. IL:'::.'-. e: -Q n::7:\:1^;iR i --:-1\. a .^ t . ='3- z; -::
!! ii z _r','z!!7I,l--iz:. ,:::-:
e
=.-_ !:g:;M-i <&----:-- - i i _ r-.s<a-)c* *r=<-\-:- t' r:
-rc\-
I
IP
lo
I
I
I
I
I
I
t--,
r5
rtrIt!
t3tzr6
r5
I
l_
t3
I
I
I
gIa
,El9z
l"E
lo
NOIIVNIVA
F(J,zr{z
= 'tr't a <z)-Xryrgi';i9?=do
-r<=+st:-l ', = - i:- Ltlg;-;;aooorz|J
=297 z E r: H: S<trcazA.tP3E { ilrFEiiPits; [i E o><coG(Dz-
e
=ZiZtL
f,.-az: r >YgV
6c-rtz>-o/'\ 7\ <n
r!<
!.J=u)-9U s
LIJiN(J
z
F
UJ__)
E(L
trJ
o
)z
z
zz
c0o>z
)J<<.)
=ea
coil>
Llt,L t
E
o
o
E
()
o
F
=E
UJo-z9Fo
&FazoO
-
a
E.uJo-u-
LUo-
F
.-G'
o3
i.li
tltllttltll."lI s'tll;ltoltoll<l>t _-lEl <lrl >l
RI
:l
r1
RIal
=l<l>l
z:
ut
z
(D
I
I
t_l-
I
.,l@l
PI;l;l<l
<l i>l (J
lt+t*LItllllfltEltoltoll<l>!lfl=l 5
ca
c( itLIJ-fN
O
d
l-O
t
Fz
O
E
zt
et
)z
(J
t
F
tFz
)
dF
uJ
-JLU
E.
<Fd(J
LTJ <zg.L!rrtZ-oO
E.
tJJz3
LUi-(J
E.
aoa9.:o
lrltl
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON WED THUR it,/'/ .'/lt /
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
D SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL
c*EcrRrclr-:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
D FINAL
PPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
C] DISAPPROVED RETNSPECTTON REAUTRFD
oarc f .z/-zT
INSPECTOR,.
F
zozzo
G
F
FI
=6
4
I
I
I
t!!
to
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r(J
IGtr!
,zlo
'f
tIa:.
:-igl
F?- ?-
3r:ii
i,rZ=ai. 1. ==rFF3r
<ir.tZ:-:tl:ilg;!!:::iii, '*:> _4< 3 i'r!:<l<'-:
<f,
r$
LLt
(r
UJo-ault!ll-
E.uJ
J
F
F
o
3g
Ez
6
o
ur
2
llJ
(J
9EF(J
zd
f
UJ
z
tr
E
==
(L
(5zo
5(D
J
2
Io
UJl
NOrlvnlvA
;
o-
F@
i
GuJ
3
=
u,l
?
CE=zz,r-=<e f;a Fc:attgBPls+eaEgfl-azZ
,^UrZt. d .nr3 < rHF9 9z- ai o3oE=HH9p;gEEooorzc)
zIFI
z
I
II
II
I
l_;\
3_
z
E
3rtlt3\
(r
u.tzt!(,
N
(\I
zztr^
@Oz>.o(J<)zl!<oqHr?i5..: c.i
zotr
l
UJ
t
z
Eoo
z9
k
uJF
=z
z
Tl-
uJ
UJ
aYl\atc)
,uJcroo
=
lltlIIIiltl
lml| 0.1toltcll<lAJ|crl <lEl >l
I
I
(lUI
<l
-4al
flEI
q
I<la
tllltltltltltltltlIJtfl
tcltcrt<>t Jcl A
tltltlll-llo-tlrlltltfrtettcxtclg;.
4dQ
(.'z
J
t!
t!
z
TD
&6
t.lJ
FF
F
tF
z
T(J
LU
z t--
=<2d
)zo.O
O
)E<o(JF
-<
ut, 26o
<F0a c)uJ<ZGUJF(1 Z
r-c
C
oz
E
G
UJc
Jzozo9ze
>zffJO(L LL
LJLJL I
-JJ<.,59
= e'<
dd=
c0,
E
o
c)
q)
E
f,pF=Ca?o ;'iia;
otL
tr>!. t-
(u!a:I
I
trnLl
oz
Foul'-'t
F 15E liE, I-lrl l-
o-z9F
C)lE
azo
C)
/CAI .- ,1F:\ ' r/l=\z_E
=
UJ
ko
€YPtz+
57sa (sfes
flnrn oft , 6.
fu{,\&,u
4a*Lr Eo
/t,"f*t
Lfn
L/rt
Ll ,r
L/ro
tp at
LEa'l
L/8as
L/aau
c/ar
cf so
t/r
?/,
fs
po td"n k ou€.,R.
.al
I,
'l
JI
It
.llVo {r)oEL 6uLR
1(
l(
f(
rl
7,;;.(-, aJ "V,'V*',-/
oo
€- c. I II ttn L J.he. DcLL
S€* up ,!u.,fr,r1,tf- 56"J *AM4,.(%4
5^+.S,r,t ,
,Lt i 1oa.
n-"g9-59'-)
GRAVEL SURFACE ROOF WITH NAILABLE DECKS
^€D Fyn"n"F,
APPLICATION RECOMMENDATIONS-
-, RCCOUTTACNDED FOR ALL ZONES
MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
MATEBIALS
REOUIREMENTS
PER 1OO SO. FT.
Mechanical tasleners ' as requited
PERMAGLAS EVANS BASE - 1 plv' 25 lbs.
PERMAGLAS ULTRA PLY - 2 plies 22 lbs.
Asohalt - plies (nominal) 60 lbs.
Asphalt. surlace 60 lbs
Gravet or 400 lbs.
Slag 300 lbs.
Accessories and llashing materials as required
'PERMAGLAS COMBINATION BASE may be
substiluted lor EVANS BASE on WOOD decks
This sp.cilic.tion is.ligible lor t PERI'AGLAS REXEWA8LE
FOOF GUARANTEE whon in thr opinion ol t'| tulho?i:td
P€nMAGLAS inspeclot all- con.lilaonr lisl'd in "G'nertl
Recomm€n(t.lioos'' Podron ol this SPacilicllion Mlnull h'r'
baen m€l,.nd the published.oquir.monls lor impl'ment"rg th'
"Gurrsnteeal guill'up Rool ProcedutG" hive be" comPlclt(t
THE ROOF OECK shall be lirm, clean, dry and smooth PERMAGLAS EVANS
AASe sn"ff be applied at right angles to continuous ioints ot surlace to be rooled
anOtappeO so water llow is ovet or parallel lo, but never against' lhe laps The
[""" "'nL", sha be tapped 2" on sides and 6" on ends and naited on 9" cenlers
tnt*gn1h" r"p. and on 18" centers along lines 12" distant lrom each edge lt
rrt"fii" rrtn"O up 2" above the canl on alt walls and vertical surfaces PER'
t/|aeLns ulrnn PLY shall be applied parallelto the base sheet and lapped so the
iio* or ,n"t", is over or paralel to, but never against, the laps. A1 end laps shall
be at leasl 4" and adjacenl end laps shall be al least 12" aparl' Embed lwo plies
oipinr"rnCr-aS uLThA PLY in shingle lashion, lapping t9"' inio uniform solid
iloppingt of hot asphalt. Embed the full $/idth ol each ply sheel in hot asphall
api[J"ai " unirorm rate ot 25lbs. per 100 square leet Each plv shall be lighlly
lioot"O ". ii is applied. All plies shall be turned up 2" above the lop ol lhe canl
andshall be soliO mopped to the cant and vertical wall Embed not less lhan 400
fU". of gtru"f or 300lbs. ol slag per 100 squareleet of roof area into not less than
60 lbs.;l hot asphalt per 1OO square leet On slopes 2" per loot or over' the ply
sheets shall be nailed to the deck 18" ttom lhe back edge ot each sheet'
vnlliis nNo wATEBWAys shal 'eceive an exrra tayer of ULTBA PLY which
,nJio" "r leas.t 36" wide and shall extend at least g" up lhe inctines oul ol the
valfeys. fnis pfy shall be laid ptiot to the application of lhe rooling plies'
' Alt Application Recommendalions lrom "Genetal Recommendations" Sec'
iion are considered part ol lhese specilications'
ROOFSIOPE>
ooz
2frc()
{ozTFIF
={
CLo'Eo
3o:
o
oo3
3g:.
og
olt3oa
nRn
Ef;E I3
+!= le
FE" lfi
l=!ntr
3P
z=0@22ooz
zt-
2 ,/-\
an
d=ZA
'b>-^2-r^\J>
o9p-{c3=o=d8n
-il$ig
rtrd 9io-
o
2A-{mnz>mC)!-{>
n
T
=mo{
€zm
tz
IT
dc
$$;9ifi
Fu
tt' i
Di-lt
siPr.
FLx
EFo>'t-
-
(Dt-
:!trzo
=
-oI
:
mln
I ?-t
!-
Bt>r-t>lo
fl l3t>
lFt>
l8
nF :
lI
x
u)
N
u
f
h
6'
0
ErFDlonFB
P+
ln
rC
F_r
F
5t-
+
3
F
o
um(tN"
'Tl
T-
m
n
3 :
.l
t-
nm
z
m
ma--{-9=6'F7)
l-U'
ooo3*;;tiFZ
Fct-zlr, -,6A{
cz@zOiil4<Y=
!m@g;+
30fi=x .,1.tz
I@mmc)utoo>6=I95zqr0--r >ffi=>=
ON
-2g-i*fi IgUP i or^ > 'n\-r e z o
'A.i c2 of{.o '< zt\lAr " E !Eo = E b
-2 a, - -llo 6 oil -n z zr,r'€
tx
.{>F>3El'l€;o>a- <tr->"=_
X-(')=l'> o>:
=:9:i;:=;i<:ztro>r, o>orloi-txg: > 6
=-222v-9zu>F3ia3ElrISii,?aaii;
'; ol-n>:,,1 N:3i->
EIz6l
PIdl"l
I
I
I
ol>l--t ''l
I
I
,u'
I t/'
I
9ln--{vml
r\'
(
t'1
I
mn
=-tzo
0
-{m
N.t:
ts
!vo(-mo-lz9
It-t\z
ll
lp
$
zl<l
I\loO
E-:
E
o-
ttoit
_:olrl =o,+'Tl o
io|:O??
trt
CLog
3o3
NDtr
trtr!
<I@rfl :.- (-
-.o
::."iB,t-
'n Il
z=9@
ooz
zr-
ooza
-{nco
_{ozTm7
=-{
2 .-\
x3z':
;>oz
\J>
z.;
3<
tzoon
90
=T3:
-too>
r)
-tmaz>monl>
o-
=mo
€zm
tz
=m
gf,uiao>'l-
r
--l
tI,t-
I
=z
G)=
!-
l'
fn
I
t-
m
TI
f,t
=
I 3
t-
m
II Et>
IFl>
l3
-n
=
moa
n o
I
l-
mo
z
m
m
TFo(-mo
zo
c)Nm^zy=m!l;'u '.:P Eo
=za)daoo'azvoutIo 62.o< S h2 l./, - --lo5 o'nzz
€
^
or€s+mfirEazoolct-z
<;:
--l
VALUATIONCI-l0lz'6)lojilOl
-l
I
I
I
I
I
I
ol
-rlml
z. lol
ol
=lzql
4ldl'l
I
I
I
I
El-l
I
I
r.€>F>: @ It€+c>(,|* <trroo"j]
ca(/,;g> -n>::;:;r!;iii<:z Iro>", Q>otrc'!ixSI>o=rYZZY9zu>:7t > = l
1il39.1!-'Et.
-iz i :]}
d"ct-lJ ?"t=:> ir>zFi i;;
1'm
=-.1
zo
i.I.-
==17>All(.9
o.r .(Do'otl-r' fl=3lni Ilo ..l-n o
t:(|t'-:.: otiil-Jl'-'r cJ
G(DgoT'3o:
Dnn
FHE
,32iooYFf
'TrTorCCz=oq,>=
5"zozr
0f
()
@z
m
c)Ifm
frc)av
2;{c7?
BE1ZOon
mc)I
z
2{
o
-.1on
o.-l:rmv
{:o
()
=c
z
r
1
7,a
0
:omrt !uu
I{m
s
$t\t\R-t\
o(-mo-{
zo
1'mn3q
zo
r€>ro>:!rrtt+c>vr- <O:o>ti]3F6;i:-!.f,ii!ii
:Ztoo>., Q>n@c'r€x
F,! ti4
iiiii
iSdri
it'ii>-ir€tiiitH;
tql>Ft>lolo
la
I
I
I
I
o .li{t><F
Fplnrn
Y'
I
I
I
I'olrl
I
I
I
c)N9ois E$F .io
=zc)A ?9DoaIo 64o< S bzqoo o'f1 z z.€oFx.
zol9a=
*TEu."S:oottanzo
:oom m o.939eP6EF93zano-{>nlzz
o z. I c, c) oggH?*H
E$=E'2*n1i
=2" A a
tNsP0noN REOuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE i I '.:'JOB NAME ! I \'r-r ;
CALLER
TUE9READY FOR
LOCATION:
..--..-.\.
(-AN4.r PMTHUR FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
I tr UNSERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
. ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE_
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr
tr
tr
POOL i H, TUB
E
o FINAL FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
g-noucH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
g-FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
(.4)DATE INSPECTOR
-
-/
t\pI
$s
F1\
Y
uJ
Oiz<rJt
z
'-uj
Y*
4. !J
o
UJ
uJ
z
,+
t-
F2
O
Irlz
=
a
z
335fl<$lgr:
-ko(au rr. F O f
<I9;iT;T"Ug;Hfr3
a:?istrir:5se;ri,<oaz;nliS:E*6:fH=95E- i .. < c- i B e'sa o E<c < >,1
F
=lll
UJ
zg
F2uJEuJ
UJ
F
ul
oo
It
UJ
F
J
IJJ
<t
J
I
ELI
t
Er
lrl
B
g
z
-oJ
-f
o
=
l!G'
-,-eF-
tl
llJ
Fxut
=c
Fo
z
o
I
F
tttto
2
llJo.oz
J
@
llJ
UJt!voIIJT
z
J
a
ul
z
F
o
zo
F
cuJF
?
=ut2
(,z
J
6
ul
Fz
ourJuJ
u,lo
tt
z
UJ
C)
t!z
F
ul
oul
LL
5
uJ
o-o
cul
vz
o
ur
rt
uJ
4ctz
Fo
o
z
tr
A
IJJq
2
4
o
JJ
Btxut
Js()
Iu
=E
Flt
A
oJo|r
F
^
ulcoFat,
ciz
E2f
z
f,
tto
2
NOtrvn'lvA
v
3tl
2
tr
ut-o
c
|lJz!J
z
F
(J
tt
llt
ll,l
J
=
o
=
6
J
trr>9(r|
:*N alt F
zo9
-ot
z
trq*d.6F.(9Ox>x(J:z:<
>U
-ni
' 4,%t +f 'ftr$"Jtt-1-fu
rn#prtoN REeuEsr
CAL
TUES WED THUR
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE J- ta- t?JOB NAME
&/ts'zu,t - 0-t z.6ath-u
READY FOR
LOCATION:
PMFRIINSPECTION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
D UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V,E FOUNDATION / STEE-
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
POOL / H. TUB
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
tr
O EXHAUST HOODS
SUPPLY AIR
PPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
lNSPEcroR - tr ,'( t, -DATE
FO
ez3
DF
F.
z
tOol
ql
Irl
F
t
F
l-tF
h
z
z
Pi<='1
a
a
Y
z
z
troiH:*EoA(J
IJJ
zf,z
O
E
,1
a
F
z
e
z
z
2
F
rlrl
Ft
F
Lu
(Jz
:<
cc
oF
E
lu
cc
Jtt
alJc(
FoJ
J
F
F
uJ
oJtt
aFoF
tr1
zulE
UJ
uJ
\Y,r-rYwi
=f;
!
I
LLGto
-?-oE'Ib-fo
uJ
xul
oz
Y
iQt!tl-o
2
Jiv,
F
u,
uJ
2
lll
E
u,l
z
oJ
lhulul
Y,ufg
oz
Y
3
tt
(J
ul
zo
oo
z
llJv,
F
2
ulJ
IJJ
uJt)
u,
3
(,/,tgl
Yz
Ec
u,/t
tl.
IJJcq
z
F
u,l
=
ulA
6-
z
F
cl
z
F
lE
4ul
ul
zot-
u,to
oz
IJo
o
IIJ
lJ-
6
uJ
o.o
zoF
uJFJ
=uJz
so
ulE
=o
Flt
t4
o
ott
Fl!
t,g
lloFq
l!
z
z
z
z
NOtrvn'lvA
a)
\)i[
=-Is>(9(|
\ll(\l-ul
2
_tn
z
tr91e6FEa0
=>-2*<
AO>oFO
;ni
u,l
)
:
z
J
II
Y
@
J
o
IJJ
J
aE
z
J
t!
F
7
tuwn u 7:30 Pl4
75 soulh tronlaqe roadGrr-;a;f.-rrSZ-
(303) 476-7000
ORD I NANCES AI'ID RESOLUTI ONS
C]TIZEN PARTICIPATION
PRESENTATI ONS
6) AppEAL 0F THE pEC DECISI0N 0N LODGE AT VAIL C0NDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SWIIiIMING P00L
ENCLOSURE
APPEAL OF PEC DECISION ON LION'S PRIDE BUILDING
APPEAL OF DRB DECISION OF METAL ROOF AT LODGE AT LIONSHEAD PHASE II
APPEAL OF DRB DECISION ON GORE RAI'JGE PROPERTIES DISPLAY BOX VARIANCE
VAIL ASSOCIATES. PRESENTATION ON CLOUD SEEDING
APPROVAL OF EASEI4ENT AGREEMENT BETI^JETN TOIIN OF
TO|,lN MAIIAGER REPORT
TOWN ATTORNEY REPORT
AJOU Ri1i4INT
IAI
t) 0RDINANCE # 25, SERTES 0F 1982, FIRST READTNG. AN ORDINANCE PROVIoING FOR A CHANGE
in THe RIVIEI^I PROCESS FOR ADDING OUTDOOR PATIOS iN COMMERICAL CORE I AND COMT1ERCIAL
._ _.c0RE II.
2) ORDINANCE # 26, SERIES 0F 1982, FIRST READING. AN 0RDiNANCE AMENDING oFF-STREET
PARKING AND LOADING IN THE VAIL I'IUNICIPAL CODE.
3) 0RDINANCE # 27, SERIES 0F 1982, FIRST READING. AN ORDINANCE CORRECTING TYPoGRAPHICAL
ERRORS IN THE NEI^I MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT.
q) 0RDINANCE # 28, SERIES 0F 1982, FIRST READING. AN ORDINANCE MENDING SECTION
17.40.07s coNDoMrNruM coNVERSToN niirnlcrlne rHE TIME AN owNER i"lAY usE TllE UNIT.
5) RESOLUTI0I,| # 19, SERIES 0F 1982. A RES0LUTION EXERCISING THE OPTION AND 0BLIGATION 0F
THE TOWN COUNCIL TO REDEEI'I CERTAIN OF ITS TOl,lN OF VAIL STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS'
7)
a)
e)
t0)
t't)
FOR
VAIL
1982-33 SEASON
AND VAIL WATER AND SAI'IITATION DIST.
o MEI4ORANDUM
T0: Planning and Environmenta'l Commission
FROM: Connunity Development Department
DATE: August 4, 19t32
SUBJECT: Application to erect an air-supported structure to be used as awinter-time enc'losure over ha]f of the Lodge at vail swiruning pool.Applicant: Lodge at Vail, Inc.
The Lodge at Vail is returning with the same proposal that they submltted at thelast meeting on July 26. The-staff recommenditibn remains the-same and the memodated July '15 is enc'losed,
t'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMOMNDUM
Planning and Environmental Comm:ission
Commun'ity Deve'lopment Department
July 15, 1982
Application to erect an air-supportedtime enclosure over half of thb'LodqeApplicant: Lodge at Vai1, Inc.
structure to be used as a winter-at Vail swimming poo1.
The project is essentiall.y a bubble to be placed over half of the swimming pool atthe_Lodge at Vail. The dimensions of this'structure are approximately 40-fbetby 50 feet by 15 feet high. This is a seasonal recreational structuri which willbe.erected the.week prioi to Thanksgiving and will be removed the'week fo1 lowingski'season each year. The bubble ii a wiite, translucent, vinyl coated polyestlr.
PROCEDURE
Planning Corrnission review of this projectin the conditional use chapter of the iode,Design Guide Plan--the bubble is classifiednot count as enclosed floor space. Sectionstructure as:
A temporary covering erected over a recreational emenity, such as a swimmingpoo'|. or tennis court, for the purpose of expanding theii use to the cold weithermonths. Such seasonal covers may'not be in'place-for more than seven consecutivemonths of any twelve-month period. For the iurposes of this title, a seasonaluse or structure shall not constitute site coverage and shal'l not be subjectto building bulk control standards. Any seasonal-use or structure shall-requirea conditional use perm.it. . .
Since a seasonal structure is not subject to bulk control standards, such as enclosedf'loor area, it is not subject to the Vail Village Design criteria. However, theComrnercial Core I d'istrici does'list several sp6cial c6nditional use criteria inSection .|8.24.070. These criteria are listed below.
CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA
I. In considering an_application for a conditional use permit within Commercia1 Core Idistrict, the following development factors are applicable:
A. Effects of vehicular traffic on conrnercial core I district
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE:
is subject to the criteria outlined
not the criteria outlined by the Urban
as a temporary structure which does
18.04.290 defines "seasonal use or
The bubble has no direct influence on traffic.
a
Reduction of
This project
Reduction of
No influence.
Consideration of Faclors :
.-
vehicular traffic in Commercial Core
will not reduce or increase traffic
non-essential off-street parking.
!\r\r jg i"r !r!r!,, lC _c_ t/ t,tl9t-
I
in the Commercial Core.
of Community Development recommends
on the following factorsl
B.
c.
E.
F.
D. Control of delivery, pickup, and service vehicles..
No influence.
Development of public spaces for use by pedestrians.
The bubble js not adjacent to any major pedestrian way.
Continuance of the various commercial , residential, and public uses in ConmercialCore I district so as to maintain the existing character of the area.
The bubble will not interfere with the various commercial , residential andpubi'ic uses in the village. The bubble will allow a recreational use to becontinued throughout the year.
Contro'l quality of construction, architectural design, and landscape designin Commercial Core I so as to maintain the exist'ing-character of tire area]
The.quality and design of the bubble should be careful ly reviewed by the Design
Review Board. Also, the continued quality of this structure over the years
will_depend on maintenance procedures. The applicant should nor allow thebubble to deteriorate.
Effects of noise, odor, dust, smoke, and other factors on the envjronnrent of
Commercial Core I district.
The bubble will not produce any odor, dust or smoke. The mechanical
systems which support the air supported structure are fairly quiet.
The conditional use criteria, as outlined in chapter .lg.60, should also be usedto,,evaluate the pool bubble.
G.
H.
II.
Upon review of Chapter 18.60, the Departmentapproval of the conditional use permit based
Relationship and impact of the use on devel o nt ob.iecti ves
The code has provided for seasonal
rneet the conditional use criteria.the amenities of the Lodqe.
town,
long as they
bubble will enhance
of the
recreati onal
A properly
structures as
designed pool
The,gffgct of,llrg light and air, distribution of population, transporlationfacilities, utili
schools, parks an
The bubble willl have s1 ight to negligible influence on the above factors.
:-
-
-
t
e
arb I
roasepre -s- 7lts/sz
Effect n traffaic with rti cul ar reference to conqestion. automotive andesrran safetv an conven ence raTTtc tlow a control . access. maneuvera-remova snow rom street a nq areas.
e scate a n relation surroun nq uses.
Lodge maintenance crews will have to periodically remove snow from theperimeter of the bubble.
Effect the character of the area in which the sed use is to be located
The Lodge bubble will be.fairly inconspicuous. 0n three sides it will be sur,-rounded_by the. Lodge,_and facei the reir of the Lazier Ariade on the fourthside. The bubbre will be visible from the viilag;-eiarii-u"i the bubble wilrbe tucked awav so i! yllr by n9 meani dominate ifie vjers't"o,i irre priia.If Hamy's Bar is built, the bubble will be entiiely-iireinea from the plaza.
Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to theproposed use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Community Development recomnends that the conditional useperm'it be approved based on the foilowing findings:
Illt !.!: p"oposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of thisorornance and the purposes of the district in which the site'is-located.
That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it wouldoe operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare or material'ly injurious to properties or improvbments in the'vi;i;iii.
That the.proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions ofthis ordinance.
The staff recommends that one stipulation be attached topermit:
'1. That the structure wil'l be erected the week priorwil1 be removed the week following sfi seaioh eiitr
the conditional use
to Thanksgiv'ing and
year.
-
7
BJ'L,
6d.Q -
-<
€as --rL f*L T 44 t4 --(ty*4--t,AJ&u-; dJ- 5"4
7Au,-a^,2, cM;**
/",a- a-t, H(/
?r,^--Tf
4"Ma".-- fJ v/
s, /a 6/-
(- A tJJY-k -
e#J4 P^4
P
olt\)P
Cr) t\t F
N
{
@t9
\J< CNp . 'r5 l\JBF ry I>o ^P l!!O t!9 lOPO op. ll{/\!' P IF,PP FJ OPP' O!.1.4 ts ooFiPF ooO"\ vO4F ti
|r')Q' EvOq pOHa\pocfts
p
P.
\,
oFIoa
H
E
:UEIv)Fl
a
H
tr1Fz
cl
H
@HFlt{oz
H
!d
F
=
H5orrl
w
v)
Fl.l
Fl
rl H h-l h-l 'l
P \,/ \J \JoFl t ts €I .-+ -+ >.1
fi ts' H. P..r ra
,4P0coOct r'J (-f F
cfA
\J PJ Li' (JoH.op
oooo
tsHgog
al' ctoHoo
F
X
Flti
a)
a(A
t-.t
z
H
oC.t
EF]
HU
t!u
F
HHUOF\JO
catrlFcJF€
rdu
H
)t
@@ @@@-{ -l('lot\J qrQOC,t | '- |o oo ooo I oo I
oo
I
I
@@@-1\l \lut ('l
oo
I
1*
P
*.0
I
nl-'t
f ,'
EDMUND H. DRAGER, JR.
ATTOR,NEY & COUNSETOR
BOX 1669, VAIL, COL 81657
303.,t76- | 3 t4
URGENT
PLEASE RESPOND BY
oo
tr NO REPLY NECESSARY
DATE:
SUBJE
/
€
ACT:
') 7'7L
,--0-z .,trUJ
+ti,*'/&
%6r
IETS
SIGNEo: DATE:
SIGNED:
SENDER: SEttlD WHITE AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBON INTACT.F0Rlt n0. 3c. nt sTlfl0inY Houst,lllc..1000 rloRlottlt., xlecmn l, fD.2ltl0
.\?
t
I TM H. NAER .t.
,tF$rE r oqrttGorr n, ur- oq. r
t
-*Ert
D
D
tr
URGENT
PLEASE RESPOND AY
NO REPLY NECESsARY
tJ D ATE:
SU BJE
/
5 'J 7 -] L-
c, A--+. tU'J'* i,*'/"^hu< pr-t- *,a
@
)ffi*%--Qf ,fiU""-/
I
,u,tt- cA /^t*4 dt/- (*lh, eJ!,,^ ffi
JOw-
SIGNED:DATE:
SENDER: KEEP THIS COPY.
roR i0. Mnt3c. fllE srrflontty Houst. Inc, 1000 FLoRloa lvt.. HAffRsmfll. t!0- 21740
?
=.F
/
Er.EI.
nlffi,
IL tIL fr.r
J-rl
URGENTtr
o
D
PLEASE RESPOND BY
NO REPLY N EC EssARY
TU DATE:
SUBJE
/
@
)
IEI!
SIGNED:DATE:
RECEIVER: KEEP THIS COPY, RETURN WHITE COPY TO SENDER r0rM 0. ilRl3c. rHE srtTr0lltRY llous[. lllc.. l0m tonlM avt.,lllcffsrorf , rl0.21740
l)t.., .1:.' r.: .
:;rrf,.i'1 ( , , (, /.r.'
[)eOi. t,titi, t ! .r i ti.,r.ttua
LIOLi A f' FivF(tRCtirtENT DtVISION
REOUfST TO CHANGE, ALTER OR MODIFY PREMISES
NOTE: e retail or wlrolesale licensee may make no physical changc, alteralion or moclrtrcation of the licensed premrses whrch
materially or substantially alter the licensed premises or its usage irom the plans and specifrcations submitted at the
time the original license was obtained unless prior request is made on this form and prior written consent obtained
lrom the local and state licensing authorities. Consent of the licensing authorities is not necessary before a licensee
. paints or r.edecorates the licensed premises; installs or replaces electrical lixtures or €quipment, plumbing, refrigerat-
ion, air conditioning or heating fixtures and equipment; lowers ceilings, installs or replaces floot coverings; or replaces
fLrrniture and equipment, Ouestions concerning whether to obtain prior consent of the licensing authorities shall be
addressed to the State and Local Licensing Aurhorities.
The undersigned licensee hereby requests permission to change, alter or modify the licensed premises pursuant to
Colorado Liquor Code Regulation 47-106.2 or Colorado Boer Code Regulation 46-106,3 All answers must b€
printed irr ink or typewritten. lf additional space is required to answer any question, a separate sheet maY be attached.
i, N Al!"E OF LICENSEF,lndcp Prnncrt i eS InC.Lvv:re '
2. TRAOE NAME OF ESTABLISHMENT:Lodge at Vai I
3. LICENSE N UNIAE R:
04-22776-001
4. TYPE OF LICENSE:
3.2 ff Liq uor fE
5. CLASS OF LIQUOR LICENSET\fter hours Hotel & Rest.
t . A DDF Ei7
E
Ff : tf6?.d
TFataT S.rT,JE " * tho acld'6si o/ lee.r descnption .s it aepr€ars on tho late.t prior rlconre apprlcatron):
CITY:
Vai I
COUNTY:
tagl e
AUS INESS PHONE:
476- 5011
ZtPt
B 1657
,'. f.lAlLlNG AODRESS lrf Dilterentl
Sarne
CITY:
Vai I
STATE:
Col orado | 8i657
8. U,'ILL I*: PR.ITO:'L ].IA\G5 RESULT IN ANY INCREASE OR OECREASE \THEIOTALSIZf OR CAPACITY OF THE LICENSEOPREt.llSL:.,r (r't: c I t,,..,-r r5 !es cxpLa/n In detr l:
vc< f llJtr,l
L Sr' LL THE PROPOSEtI CHANGE ALTER THEI INGRESS OR gcRESS TO THE LICENSED PREMISES? (tf answer Is yes, explain in detail):
YE.- I r',o IJ
r' ...,. r . riL pR ' ""',, -.;.:i '.',.,.'r,' .,; ;, -o,- r ,.*, r" "-'"e "oRrc-" "D" "f""o..-detril):,{ x NO I See attached expianation
I 1 \.'; I*I I]']f)POSED CI-]ANGF ''FFL(:T IHE BAS]C CHARACTER OF THE PREMIS,OR THE PHYSICALSTRUCTURE THAT EXISTED IN=fllE lrLn N ON FIL [ !\ iTH ] rla LAIEST PRIOR APPLICAYION? (tf answer rs yes,expaln in d€tail]:
-._- Fi,YL) I r\(' I/\
, - r -tiRoPo..J rJ iFtr3l'i THL LICEN:,LD pREllil5F-S? (ll an5wer rs yes, state how iaf ge a ch;jngc n consumption is aotrcLpated)r
'E5r i l No IX
i'i l)Ot S Tf lt L-ICENSEE HAVE LEGAL POSSESSION OF THf cHANGED PREt\'!l5ES lF -fHE PROPOSED CBANGE iS APPROVED? (lf answeri! no,5l.Jii' 1,0,,.,, l.1gr posses5ion i5 to be obtained):
\'as ix i!:r i l
t4 APf r.i I H(t\/,i Lr PRf [1-{(t 1 OyJNEO
, x I UwneqYt:. N' '
OR LEASEO (A1t dclr copy oi deed,lease or contract): lF LEASED, F ROM WHOM?:
1 :I.,'{ I L. I iiI J R.-.2]-.)::I I) ( T]AI'IGE R[SULT IN TIIE LICENSED P{1EM]SES BEING Lo.A I ED w THII.I 5OO FEET oF ANY PREMISES:):,( I,I I 'J.Y, A FIJI]LIC OR PAROCHIAL SCHOOL OR THE PRINCIPAL CAtvIPUS OF ANY COLLLGE. UNIVERSITY. or SEMINARY?ii' ;'ir.{. ,:, y.i,. !xr,.|i rr det.l ): VeS _ lO ii
lo.'"(rl. l lf ll r''rilPoSF,D CHANGE uE lN COMP!ln NCE wITH THE gUILDINO AND ZOINc LAWS OF IHE APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL/.-l. llOt-'ll \; li ais,,.{'r is no,erplain In detJal):
'r' E:. X Nr) L- i
.HANGE BI II.]]I IATE D ?n"'"t' June i- 1s l"*' tg8z
WHEN WILLTHE PROPOSED BHANGE BE COMPLETED?Month ,l rrne I oav 30 | vear 19Bz1""
I€ I; I.]O I]N'5 SC..]f TJULE HAS BEEN ADOPTED FOR THE PROPOSED C HANGE. APPROXIMATELY HOW LONG WILL BE REQUIRED TONl/il\a T .r LlANa,f OfrCE AFpROVED?
1:.DEs{ tt Iri tiEl O\! I llf PROPCSf O CHANGE lN THE LICENSED PREMISES WITH ALL PERTTN€NT DETAILS NOT HERETOFORErriscrrr! r.i. (Aira..r). separate sheei I needecr): sgg attachgd gxolanation
ATTACH TO T HIS FOR[1 COPIES OF THE INTERIOR PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LTCENSED PBEMISES WHICH SHOW THEPREMISES AS P RESE NTLY LICENSE D, AND THE PREMISES AS PROPOSED AFTER THE CHANGE.
' Lodge Properties Inc., doing business as Lodge at Vail-and
currentlt holder of an extended hours hotel and restaurant license
is desirbus of obtaining approval pursuant to the Town of vail
Local Liquor Licensing Autir-ority D-eck and Patio Guidelines approved
June 24r'1981 to cLarify use of-the prernises on a permanent basis
and to spell out and define tenporary and other special uses ot
the licensed prenises.
At the present time, one pernanent bar is located in Mickey's
bar and duriig the next iew moirths that will be remodeled, reduced
in size and relocated within Mickey's bar. Wren special functions
necessitate portable service bars ire set up and temporarily operated
at various piaces within the buildings throughout the licensed.premises.
In each instance, control is naintaiied by Lodge personnel and/or
special group personnel to assure that only authorized guests use
that facility.
The Lodge also has historically used the patio areas designated(A), around -wimning pool; (B), adjacent to Salt-Lick Dining Roon
dni-to be renodeled-and renaned Cafe Cipriani; (C)' adjacent to
Cafe Arlberg and covered in sunmer with an awning; (D), -rooftopof Internatlonal Roon partially covered with a tent roof j ald-;(E), the patio adjacent to the International Roorn. It would be
dui'desirb to continue use of a1l of these areas and to continue
to utilize one or nore of them on a seasonal basis for food and
alcoholic beverage service. The alcoholic beverage s-ervice would
be by means of p6rtable service type bars located within each
fencbd or enclo-sed patio and acceis from the street or public-
areas would be throirgh one entrance, with sone type of control
program.
Three of the patios are presently enclosed so as to neet the
guidelines establi-snea Uy the- Local Airthority, -those being tfe
fool area (A), and the Ritberg Terrace. (C) I and the International
hoom patio'(6i. The renainin! two, (B), adjacent to Salt Lick,
Cafe bipriani-dining loom and (D), roof of the International Room'
we wouli propose to enclose with cedar split rail fence similar
to that used on the International Roon patio.
on those several. occasions during the spring, summer and fa1l
seasons that there is need to host a lnuch larger group' such as
Jerry Ford Invitational Golf Tournament, we uould proPose to use
the 'entire area encompassed within the dotted line and the Lodge
structuTe, using the -designated patios for service bar locations
and placing a t6nporary f6nce in- the ge-nera1- location of the
aottba 1in5 and hiving'the one access from the strceet manned by an
attendant during service hours.
We do not believe that this clarification or lequest to altel
will naterially increase the consumption of alcoholic beverages on
ihe ticensed pi'enises and does not hake any physical changes in the
existing liceirsed prernises. We feel that it nerely- clarifies.our'
present use and re-cognizes that-portable bars will be in use in
certain designated areas from tine to tine.
ADDENDUM TO
REQUEST TO CHANGE, ALTER OR MODIFY PREMISES
LODGE PROPERTIES INC.
LODGE PROPERTIES INC.
lnund H. Drager,ice President
u,Lt
U^]* fu,
a
H,_
-+2-
/1/OT?Y"* ; \/;Q
z-) rt
,t/,^f
(D
@)/t\'\:-/
l,
Ili I
I _-
I
\
lnwn u l|fll
75 soulh fronlage road
vail. colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
office of the lown manager
July 9, J-982
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Vall Town Council 0 CBicbard Caplan, Town Manager I!'
Need for Lodglng Task Force
On Thurs'day, JuIy 8, Dick Ryan and I met with Bob Farmery(Mariott Mark), Steve llarper (The lVestin), Frank Johnson(VRA), Paul Johnston and Hermann Staufer to discuss theissue of whether or not Vail may need additional lodge
rooms and is the balance of lodging and privately managed
condominium units unsatisfactory to Vail.
After a review of existing units and a philosophical discussion,the group reached the folLowing consensus:
1. With a significant number of new rooms coming onthe market at the Mark and the Westin it appearsthat the short-term may, if anything, have a sur-plus of rooms. I{e discussed the situation asrelates to the Orlando, Florida/rlla1-t Disney Worldarea in which there was a significant surplus of
rooms for a long period and was a serious detrimentto the area during that time. Therefore, until the
new rooms under construction are fu11y absorbedinto the Vai1 market, there should not be anyadditional need.
2. The issue of potential rooms in Beaver Creek and
Avon was also recognized and considered. More thanever, these units will become part of the general
Vail accommodations market and shall ensure thatthere is an increasing one-night availability inthe immediate area.
Vail Town CouncilJuly 9, L982
Page 2
Tbe addition of new rooms to a botel are extremelydifficuLt, lf not irnpossible; to justify without the
concurrent addltion of meeting space. Even largerhotels such as the Mark and the Westin would not be.inclined to pursue additional rooms unless they could
simultaneously add further meeting space. This needis even nore likel-y in the case of smaller lodges or
hotels.
A prospective applicant who may desire new or additional
aceommodation units should be required to do an extensive
market study and analysis showing the need for such rooms.It was pointed out that very few times during the year,if at all, do lodges have to turn away customers. It
was concurred that we should not get into tbe "buildlnga church for Easter" syndrome in the hotel area. VRA
stated that eveu in the peak winter months, the overall
. ocsupancy rates in Vai.L are in the 90% range. C1ear1y, '
even during most peak times, there are rooms that are
available in Vai1.
no need for theor other programs to
allow additional accommodation units--fliffi1 at this time. If the
Town Council would like additional research or need a more detailed
anal-ysis, the committee would be happy to convene again.
3.
4.
In conclusion, the group felt that
Town Council to consider potential
/-
-lV I
a
a
a
o
(r"
.(' ,'(
La:n
i %.*,-c&{*. i_i',:l-L av-,V". l fE..-
/*/4.-{-%"-
L:? (.t. . <--
/
?--e'- F
tC. teq* /' hfr L
ll, (4o+-:-{rcot*,
/
l a.
tat--
71-
ao
o14 51.^.^t.b-t o(tn^..,^- ..- tfu-
r{ tffi,(-,L-Ll"J,-fu 1,4-o { c-J-
Ua(tW n
l(, ,Jlt^l- +" I /*J &'-- -*/*rI(-r-r- k-^- {L-.-, 6.1-l-{_. - l+"-^-,-
OC k* eo-*' - tt a4o bfr.,-
4L,_Cryr,,* (*,_r,L^-f Q
\?, (\h'J /WJ'{ # /*-L ^*(.-'e-trr-.'- t t/^J /2*.",* L
O/a{'T' r'"-
rr) /2l D" i a>rc2.,,,-
.4 12"1" n'*'l
\q +-- T Ur4,r"/12r,'fu^r;
o?-
t)L.CA
\
o o
1"/ ccz*--<-
Ca-.-_>_
* e-a.,-a 1!/,,p*t'*",t1 -L l/,^4 D
C-,*.*zr C*,,*-
/2".*"6
/*+a-a,*
f-."*-*z^
h.r'i.ror--*/4
t.
2.
3,
.t
(o,
v,8,
hrE-
@a
+
LE*L O
SruDY bF.
/aneg Reoara s
/*/
''6"L t-
p.oo4.r- Al pP * ,&aE€ FbdR
#+o-!^* 0-JrT
,^.-t-uffi.r*Il- gXih-, by\_4>;L?w*
?"*
6-t-t-. t*
',a^z &
Jt *r.rnva^/4(
n@ /o&a
o
//nr,,,ta
AT VAIL
o
,lL./^ ozutzt+A%rf*@44",
I
'r^f)A.
CP-r.?1D6\{- ,-"- k /r2--,- U>Z-L- ;-\ \\n r / .ti n ./-)i.x)y"Tg 4.
(r""-*,d.+-)! + /"--r, '[Ln*-- -(r*. d*./Lovr& 4 Pt".a,+*.trH +,,-.*-
u -.#^Q r!* J* i/-- L** --f- (-/
tL Flh- app*?4 Te u-zl d*
?..e.r,*1 ,4L&-1"**^ AZ az,y'*J/-
/) llT/l* /.'7rLdLzt-
s -e-*ltb2arab' fu%,,#dm€;;
$^MM1T%ffiry*4.ft{,w4u;*^Yq Vd-\ ',LL/U.' o..-.- t/*-
ooqa u-* ai'red.+ #)t',WrryrydhPPT.r-'.. /-' d u4qV6,+-o--l?f*Tt - l" ff=-*; ba4ft
o ?t2-
)
4lhTry4ru
/z-
.I
.t
lnun box f oo o vait, colorado 81657 r 3o3.476.56r3
PUBLIC NqIICE
There will be a joint meeting of the Vail Town Council,
the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the Design
Review Board to review a presentation of conceptual plans
for The Lodge at Vail. The meeting will be held at b:OO p.m.
on Friday, January g, Lggz in the Town council chambers in
the Vail Munlcipal Building.
The public is invited to attend.
aplan,anager
t
.a 'r'o
Mn. Richand Rqan,
CommunLtttr Devzlopm
Town o[ VaiL
75 S. Fnontage RoaVaiL, Colozado 816
Oean Diclz,
With he,st wiahe".a
Sincenetg gount,
Januattg 4, 19 82
u,
0inectottznt 0zpantnent
(tJ e..t t
{on 1982, '1. an,
Jane.a B. Shetwood, Founden a.n-d Pttztident a d thz Sea Containe4t
G_r:oup o$ ecnpo.nied,. wiLl- be he.;Le $ar" a {zw dary in Januattg.The U.S. nLgL4te.ned c"onpa-nq, Sc.aCa ivLa., , put chated tlle con-tnolt-in.g iwtetett. in the Lodge. ttt Va.LI" .in Jctn*attg o{ iSBl.
'!nmedlstet-g dol"Lowing the tltsnsaetion, tlte Ae.+vi*es.6 o $ t.tneq.nchLtectuLz.L iinn o{ Ruc'{ 6ittJzntwanth wene en_ga_ge.d with thzd.in.eetion ta !-ootz .Lntc how be,st to upgnade and etpand. thz
dac.il,ittl , bath thont- ond Long-tQ,ttn, beo-nlng it,s dominantand y.tnint Laca.tian in the viLtage. in mind. -
S.{we thew, a Lot od cne,at.i.ve thi.sh".tng hnt gune int.o.theptoject s.nd uJe atte. st a po.Lnt whe.a-z LlQ. c&n Aee Lome nathelLdedin;-te dututte outL"inea'. We u,tou!-d venq mtLch tLtze to dh*neouz thinhing with qoa Lun-ing ilfi-. Slzenwaod,6 vi6it, and con-
aecguentL,g ittvit.e qou to meet l"ln. SrLe.Ituooci fiatr eoclztaiL,s andliona d'euvns6, do[-{awed bq an anehitectunaL p4etentationon Ftidag, Januanq tth at, 5pm Ln tlte lnt.e.nnatianaX, Room.
It wou!-d be much appteclat.zd i-g you dind time to dttend,and. qou ane lzindlg a,ah-r.-d .to RS0p'to nq tze:te,tanq, BettqAithen, arc ext. 510 on 562 dd ,5oon e4 pottibLe,
T hen G.
l't,anagin
Lo heng0ineeton
TGL/ha
174 East C'ore Creek hve Yail. C-olorado 81657 303-476-501f Telex45-0375
?5 routh tronttgc rd.
Yall, colorEdo 81657
(303) 476-7000
department of community development
November 3, l9b2
l{r. Wamen P'latner, Architect'18 Mitche'll Drive
Nevr Haven, Connecticut 06511
Re: Lodge at Vail
Dear Mr. P]atner:
Good to meet with you and djscuss the Lodge at Vai'l . It was also interestingfor me to see the exce1 lent interior design work you and your firm does' and
know Sea Containers will want the same qua'l ity.
I consider that the Lodge at Vail is the anchor for Vai'l Village. For manyyears, more was probably taken out of the property by the past owners than effortsto improve and upgrade the area. Nov is the time to transform this develop,ment
into its role as the center of attention for Vai'l Village.
Enclosed are copies of the Vail Village Urban Design Guide P1an, Design Considera-
tions and Conmercia'l Core I zoning district code. These are the planning documents
needed to make a determination on the potential redevelopment for the Lodgeat Vai'|.
I would'l ike to see plans you csne up w'ith at an early stage, so my staff can
share their views and make recormendations.
lie look fonrard to working with you and your firm.
Sincerely,.tt-A / ,,//-<bk-<- r'L {_:14,..-.__.'.-. \
DICK RYAN--J
Cormunity Development Director
DR:bpr
Enc'l .
box 100
uail, coloredo 81667
(3031 47&5613
department of community development
November 1, 1982
Shirlee Finney, President
Great Escape Travel Co.
Box 774168
Steamboat Springs' Co'lorado 80477
Dear Ms. Finney:
This letter is in regard to your 'letter to Dick Ryan requesting approval
of a banner on the Lodge at Vail during the CAMDA meeting. I have enclosed
a portion of the Town 6f VaiI sign code which explains that the on'ly
banners which are al'lowed are those which refer to cormunity events or
activities. I'm sure you can understand that with the large number of
dlfferent groups stayi-ng in vail at any one time that it would not be
appropriata to identify each group's headquarters with banners.
If you have any guestions' please contact me.
Peter Jamar
Town P'lanner
PJ:df
Encl .
cc: RJc Tanner, Lodge at Vail
BYRON D. BRO$1/\J aoxs4r-vArL,coLonADo8l6s8
REAL ESTATE CO.VAIL - Corner ol Bridge Streel & Gore Creek Orive
AVON - Corner ot East Beaver Creek Boulevard & Beaver Creek Place
fi'(,
(303) 476.2211
(3CB) 94+,1422
September 28, L982
l{r. Rich Kaplan
Town of Vaii
75 South Frontage RoadVail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Kaplan,
On September 27, L982, I approached you on apProval for wax
and technicaL rooms for skier reDresentat,ives to be built
under the north wins at The Lodee at Vail in- the north east
--2-
corner of the parking gardlE
I was told to talk to ltr, Steve Patterson and gave him a setof temporary electrical plans and temporary plans for the roompartitions.
Dates for assembLy were stated Eo be the 4th through the 6th of
March 1983 and that the temporary rooms would stay in placeuntil after the last World Cup Race scheduled around March 13, 1983.
Removal will rake place betweln the 13th and the 15th of March 1983.
Mr. Patterson sa$t no problems with Ehe installationthat an inspection be conducted prior Eo use after i
and thaE I pass through the plan and descrigt,ion r..rit
chief.
I oroceeded to the fire staLion and reviewed the plafile capcain. Both he and Steve Pactetson requested(6) fire extinguishers attached to the outside of ththat everything will be 0.K. if they have the oDport
inspect prior to occupancy.
It was stated and agreed that a 24 hour guard _Iras re
would be in place during the periods of use of the r
I feel this constitutes our understandlng and condit
lve (12) rooms
Doors would
4ced from the
to be 9 foot
$ut requestedrfstallationh the fire
ds with the
we have six
I rooms and
fnitl to
fluired'and
Poms.
[onal approval
I explained to 1.1r. Patterson that, there would be twe
each with a light and double socket outlet provided.
have eombination locks. llire mesh screen rvill be pl
tog of the partition to the ceiling. The rooms areby 15 foot in size.
REALIOR.
I't
for
any
the !{orl.d Cup wax roorDs. Please notify me Lf there lsfurther items of concern.
Respectfully submitted,24"*t+
Bfron D. BrownCo-Director, t'lorld Cup Event
cc! Fire Department
Steve Patterson
John lloran-Kates
Thor Loberg
"{
Project Application
ProjectName: LoOt'F AT \/A/ L ^4Ait't Doo1l Reltec EtntExtT
./ /7s4
Proiecl Descriplion: Al:
Owner Address and Phone:
C ONC T?€78 APR O
| /+T- ,,./A/ L
Archilect Address and Phone:Lo Etw i-t",t o .rzT /'l 4 /L( Lf /'TtrC TS
Legal Description: Lot
C C.L
Block Filing t/ArL Vi-L4<.^t= /ST
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Motion by:
.. Deslgn Revlew Board
OISAPPROVAL
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
SJmmary:
Zoning Administ Chief Building Otficial
O Project Apptication ll
te
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
'\d*tt Approval
a
lnun
box 100 t
nll, olorado 8l GdlFqil tY6€813
August 23, 1982
A'llen Tafoya
Ruoff -lJentworth Archi tects
500 Lionshead Mall
Vail " Colonado 81657
Dear Al'len;
0n August 18, 1982, the Design
Lodge PooI Bubble. You should
assoclationrs approval of the
Sincerely,
dspartment of community development
RE: DRB Submittal of 8-18-82
Review Board gave final approval to the
produce a letter indicating the condomlnlumproject before a buildlng permlt is lssued.
fuoJfm Sayre
Town Planner
JS:df
I
Prolect Name:
L<sAGf-
Proiect Application
PrsOe-4:ttb 6Lr4-
Proiect Description:Tl1=V/ca 4A-/A- r r't- 5.s P,4)za.'Tf4
Contact Person and Phone sTn-uc-fi)rt tQ-.Cu/.2.ft"tt4 HL c/':
'uJ
t,r-11-r rzrl b r+5o u-LOO GT 4f
u*tt-
Owner, Address and Phone:
\vA,s TkTrlJA foi,>r;'u4.\UJf:.47.+)tD4 g
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
/Awr^\Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPFOVAL
/4sT-,', t<\
AJ Sv0 H rrTfA
Su m mary:
nner E Statt Approval
Name of Project:at Vail Swimminq Pool Enclosure
Legal Description: Lot
Description of Project :
TractsA,BEC Block lC Filing Vail Village First
Air supported structure to cover 1/2 Lodge at Vail Pool. Erected
seasonallv between earl November and late April.
The following information is required for submittal
Board before a final approval can be given:
by the applicant to the Design Review
ColorA. BUILDING MATERIALS
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
Type of Material . See sample
24 ounce white vinyl coated polyester. attached below.
Aluminum Revolving door in white. fiberglass housing.
White to be Pratt E Lambert Y358W.
To be aluminum painted white.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mechanical Equipmentto be painted white,
.will be.housed.in removable boxPratt 6 Lambert Y358W.
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:NA
Phone:
PLANT MATERIALS
Botanical Name Common Name Quantity Size
TREES NA
SHRUBS NA
!'
GROUND
COVERS
soD
SEED TYPE
NA SQUARE FOOTAGE
SQUARE FOOTAGENA
NA SQUARE FOOTAGE
NATYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR
METHOD OF
EROSION
CONTROL
C. Other Landscape Features (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please
specify.
I
Name of Project: Lodge at Vail Swimming pool Enclosure
Legal Description: Lot Tracts A, B E C Block 5c Filing Vail Village First
The following information is required for submittal by the applicant to the Design Review
Board before a final approval can be given:
A.BUILDINC MATERIALS
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer: NA
Type of Material Color. )ee sampre
24 ounce white vinyl coated polyester. attached below
rl
NA
White to be Pratt E Lambert Y358W.
To be alqminum painted white.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mechanical Equipment willto be painted white, Pratt
be housed in removable boxt Lambert Y358W.
B.
Description of Project: Air supported structure to cover l/2 Lodge at Vail Pool. Erected
seasonally between early November and late April.
phorr€,:
PLANT MATERIALS
Botanical Name Common Name Quantity Size
TREES NA
SHRUBS NA
GROUND
covERs
SOD
SEED TYPE NA
TYPE OF NA
NA SQUARE FOOTAGE
NA SQUARE FOOTAGE
SQUARE FOOTAGE
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR NA
METHOD OF
EROSION
CONTROL
C. Other Landscape Features (r:etaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc;) Please
specify.
NA
..'
Name of Profect: Lodge at Vail Swimming Pool Enclosure
Legal Description: Lot Tracts A, B S C Block sC Filing Vail Village First
Description of Project: Air supported structure to cover l/2 Lodge at Vail Pool. Erecied
seasonally between early November and late Aoril.
The following information is required for submittal by the applicant to the Design Review
Board before a final approval can be given:
Type of Material grl".
,r, or.,"" *n,r" ,r,r',,r, "ou,a, *r',r"","r. ?i,?atffO*tta,o",.
tl
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
NA
NA
Aluminum Revolving door in. white. fiberglass housing.
White to be Pratt 6 Lambert Y358W.
!o be aluminum painted white.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mechanical Equipmentto be painted white,
will be. housedPratt 6 Lambert
.in removable box
Y3s8W.
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:NA
Phone:
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES
Botanical Name Common Name Quantity Size
NA
SHRUBS NA
i-
GROUND
covERs
NA SQUARE FOOTAGE
SOD
SEED TYPE NA
NA SQUARE FOOTAGE
SQUARE FOOTAGE
NATYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR
METHOD OF
EROSION
CONTROL
c.Other Land
specify.
scape Features (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please
NA
oo ol
PLANNINC AND ENVIRONI4ENTAL COMI'IISSION
August 9, 1982
2:00 pm Site Visits
3:00 pm l. Approval of minutes of July 26,1982.
'2. Request for conditional use permit in order to construct a termporary winter' tinie enclosure over the Lodgl at Vail swinrming poo1. Applicant: Lodge
Properties, Inc.
3. Request for conditiona'l use permit in order to obtain approval for
the sale of birds and manrnals at the Mountain Tropics Pet Shop on lot 3
Block 1, Vail Das Schone #3. Applicant: Mountain Tropics Pet Shop:
Catherine G. Street.
4. Request for a variance for a two foot front setback variance on lot 28block'l , Potato Patch in order to corect a survey error. Applicant:
Fox, Romrell, a Texas partnership.
5. Request for an exterior a'lteration and modification approval for the Covered
Bridge Store building on lots C and D, Blk 5 B, Vail Village lst Filing in orderto fill in the northern part of the entry to the Snug store. Applicant: John
Dobson6. Request to amend Sections 18.24.020 (C), 18.24.030 (C), .|8.24.040 (B),'18.24.065 (A) and 18.26.045 (A) of the Vail Municipal Code to change
the process for an outdoor patio in CCI and II to a conditional use permit
procedure which can be applied for year-round. Applicant: Town of Vail
7. Request for amendnents to the parking chipter of the Vai1 I'iunicipal Cotleto clarify wording, revise certain parking requirements and to amend thedefinition of Floor Area and to incjude a-new'parking requirement for
employee housing projects. Applicant: Town of Vail
8. Request for amendments to the municipal code section 17.40.075 Condominium
Conversion--Lodge and Accommodation Units to clarify working and to reflect
the original intent of the ordinance. Also an amendment to section 18.22.020
Permitted Uses in the Public Accommodation District to nnke it clear thatonly units without kitchen faciljties (i.e. accommodation units) will
be al'lowed in the PA District. Applicant: Town of Vail.
Pub'lished in the Vai'l Trail August 6,'1982
,:l o'fr
].GMOMNDUM
T0: Planning and Environmental Conunission
FROM: Conmunity Development DeparUnent
DATE: August 4, 19t32
SUBJECT: Application to erect an air-supported structure to be used as a
winter-tinp enclosure over half of'the Lodge at VaiI swinmlng pool
Applicant: Lodge at Vail, lnc.
The Lodge at Vai'l is returning wjth the same proposal that they submitted at the
last rneiting on iluly 26. The-staff recommenditibn remains the same and the remo
dated July 15 is enc'losed.
1*
I
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Cornmunity Development Department
July 15, 1982
Application to erect an air-supported
time enclosure over half of the Lodge
Applicant: Lodge at Vail, Inc.
structure to be used as a winter-at Vail swimming pool.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE:
The project is essentially a bubble to be placed over half of the swimming poo'l at
the Lodge at Vail. The dimensions of this structure are approximately 40 feet
by 50 feet by 15 feet high. This is a seasonal recreational structure which wil'l
be erected the week prior to Thanksgiving and will be removed the week following
ski season each year. The bubble is a white, translucent, vjnyl coated polyester.
PROCEDURE
Planning Conmission review of this project is subiect to the criteria outlined
in the cond'itiona'l use chapter of the code, not the criteria outlined by the Urban
Des'i gn Guide Plan--the bubble is c'l assified as a temporary structure which does
not count as enclosed floor space. Section 18.04.290 defines "seasonal use or
structure as:
A temporary covering erected over a recreational emenity, such as a swimming
pool or tennis court, for the purpose of expanding their use to the cold weather
months. Such seasona'l covers may not be in place for more than seven consecutive
months of any twelve-month period. For the purposes of this title, a seasonal
use or structure shall not constitute site coverage and shall not be subject
to building bu1k control standards. Any seasonal use or structure shall require
a conditional use permit...
Since a seasona'l structure is not subject to bulk control standards, such as enclosed
f'loor area, it is not subject to the Vail Vil'lage Design criteria. However, the
Commercial Core I district does list several special conditional use criteria in
Section 18.24.070. These criteria are listed below.
CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA
I. In considering an application for a conditional use permit within Commercial Core Idistrict, the following development factors are app'licable:
A. Effects of vehicular traffic on Commercial Core I district
....,
The bubble has no direct inf'luence on traffic.
l- 1
On" Llubble -2- 7/15/Bz
Reduction of vehicular traffic in Connnercial Core I
This project will not reduce or increase traffic in the Commercia'l Core.
Reduction of non-essential off-street parking.
No influence.
Control of delivery, pickup, and service vehicles..
No influence.
Development of public spaces for use by pedestrians.
The bubble is not adjacent to any major pedestrian way.
Continuance of the various commercial , residential , and public uses in Commercial
Core I district so as to maintain the existing character of the area.
The bubble will not interfere with the various commercial , residential andpublic uses in the Village. The bubble will allow a recreationa'l use to be
continued throughout the year.
Contro] quality of construction, architectural design, and landscape design
in Commercia'l Core I so as to maintain the existing character of the area.
The quality and design of the bubble should be carefully reviewed by the Design
Review Board. Also, the continued quality of this structure over the yearswill depend on maintenance procedures. The app'l icant should not a'l low the
bubble to deteriorate.
H. Effects of noise, odor, dust; smoke, and other factors on the environntent of
Commercial Core I district.
The bubb'le will not produce any odor, dust or smoke. The mechanical
systems which support the a'ir supported structure are fairly quiet.
II. The cond'itional use cri teria, as outlined in Chapter .l8.60, should also be used
tor'evaluate the pool bubble.
Upon review of Chapter 18.60, the Department of Community Development recommends
approval of the conditional use permit based on the following factors:
Consideration of Factors :
Relationship and impact of the use on deve'l opment objectives of the town.
The code has provided for seasonal recreational structures as long as theyrpet the conditional use criteria. A properly designed pool bubble will enhance
the amenities of the Lodge.
The effect of the use on lIglt and air, distribution gf popu'lation, transporfacilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, utilities,
-
The bubble wi'l'll have slight to negligible influence on the above factors.
B.
c.
D.
E.
F.
I
G.
|J Bubble -3- 7/15/Bz
rticular reference to stion, automotive andraffic flow a control . access. maneuvera-
nq areas.
Lodge maintenance crews wi'l I have to periodically remove snow from theperimeter of the bubble.
EffgcXJpon,the clraracter of tlle area i@o be located,incl ud i n
The Lodge bubble will be fairly inconspicuous. 0n three sidesrouhded by the Lodge, and faces the rear of the Lazier Arcadeside. The bubble will be visible from the Vi'llage plaza; butbe tucked away so it will by no means dominate tfie views fromIf Hary's Bar is built, the bubble will be entirely screened
Such other facto!.! a_l!_-q1j!elia as the commission deems ap
Effect traffai c
an safety an
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Department ofpermit be approved
That the proposed
ordinance and the
it will be sur,-
on the fourth
the bubble wil'l
the plaza.
from the Plaza.
Community Development recommends that the conditiona'l use
based on the following findings:
location of the use is in accord with the purposes of thispurposes of the district in which the site is located.
That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it wouldbe operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare or material1y injurious to properties or improvbments in the viciniiy.
That the-proposed use would comp'ly with each of the applicable provisions ofthis ordinance.
The staff recommends that one stipulation be attached to the conditional usepermi t:
1. That the structure wil] be erected the week prior to Thanksgiving andwill be removed the week following ski seasoh each year,
ao
t
- '' " fZlt,,'M
- '^ -iT
' tl
tl .
I rec 4- B/slsz
4. Request for conditional use permit in order to construct a temporary winter
ii!_,Iry"g, _repeated the. explanation of the memo for scott Edward's benefit,Decause Ldwards had not.been_at the previous meeting. He added that the afiticanthad gone.back to his.originat proposil, to cover nait ot the pool with a uirbute.savre asked the connission to iook esp6cialiy at e.' "conirot'iiiriii""i iiiiiiuction:....to maintain the,existing character of thl area.', sayre stated that it wasthe staff.feeling that this-area r.las isolaied ii.om-peoeiirian ,ou.r.nt and wastopographically depressed as wel l.
He then discussed item H."Effects of noise, odor,.." and added that the mechanical
1.re9 9I the pool bubble would make noise, but thit the staff had been assuredthat there wouldn't be much noise from the mechanics, but that the staff recommendedthat this be one condition of approval .
^E!^D,"lq:t
representing theapplicant answered that since bubbles are expensive,tne Lodge was interested in maintainence of the bubble. Bill Ruoff, ai-chiteclfor the applicant added.that a large percentage of noise from swimnring poolicame from children running and shoitiirg, and lhat ttre bubble woujO muifie-tnatnoise. He mentioned that there was a iondominium owned by Knoblock that wouldbe affected by the view of ttre OuUUte. --
Ruoff added that with snow on the white bubble, it would not be noticeable inthe winter.
Trout stated that he had no sympathy toward a bubble, but might possibly changehis mind if he knew that the -other Luildings proposed tor ttr6 Lolge ne"i goini-to be built. He added that since Harry's Ear'hai not been uuiit,-people Suviigski tickets could view the bubble. Edwards was in favor of ttre UubOtb, feetin!that it would serve a function and was not very visibie.
Donovan was confused by a statement made by Ruoff that people.would not be ableto continue to use the a1ley. Ruoff compaied the bubblb ai tne Lodge to the oneat the^Racquet C]ub in east-Vail, but Doirovan pointed out that this-bubble wouldbe in Commercial Core t and woulrj be very visible from the Plaza. Ruoff statedthat it would be below the eye level ot ihe second floor balcony railings. -
Ruorr pointed out that the pool was I'nffi:'Hiif;:{i: ll"if;l'[itTli,,l'lll'l3lrl'onot get much sun. Donovan felt that the bubble would have a very negative effecton Commercial Core I.
Piper pointed out that one positive effect was that the bubble would be removedln the sumner. He felt that if the snow were allowed to pi'l e up around the bubbleit would blend in we'|l enough. Ruoff added that it was the Lodle guests who wouldsee the bubble. Corcoran agreed with Donovan that the bubble could Ue seen fromthe Plaza and added that he-would like to see the control of noise as one cond'itionof approval, but felt that CCI was not the place for a bubble.
Scott.moved and Piper seconded to approve the reguest for a conditona'l iise permitin order to construct a termporary winter time ericlosure over half of the Lbdgepogl ?1. per the staff memo dated t/'15182 with the one condition the staff suglestedand with two more conditions-Item b, Quality Control be added, and Item H, C6n-rplaintsof noise, would cause a review of the'condiiional use.
The vote was 2-3 (Piper and Edwards in favor). The motion failed. Ruoff was remindedthat he had l0 days in which to appeal the decision.
,
'itr .
t
o ].,lEl'IORANDUM
T0: Planning and Environmental Comnission
FR0ll: Connunity Development Department
DATE: August 4, 1982
SUBJECT: App'lication to erect an air-supported structure to be used as awinter-time enclosure over ha1f of the Lodge at Vail swirming pool.Applicant: Lodge at Vail, Inc.
The Lodge at Vail ls returning with the same proposa'l that they submitted at the]ast neeting on iluly 26. The staff recormendation remains the same and the memodated Ju'ly l5 is enclosed.
t'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmenta'l Comm:ission
Community Development Department
July 15, I982
Applicat'ion to erect an air-supportedtime enclosure over half of the LodgeApplicant: Lodge at Vail, Inc.
structure to be used as a winter-at Vail swiruning pool.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE:
The project is essentially a bubble to be placed over half of the swimming pool atthe Lodge at Vail. The dimensions of this structure are approx'imately 40-feetby 50 feet by l5 feet high. This is a seasonal recreational struFture which willbe erected the week prior to Thanksgiving and wil'l be removed the week followingski season each year. The bubb'l e is a white, translucent, vinyl coated polyester.
PROCEDURE
P'lanning Corunission review of this project is subject to the criteria outlinedin the conditiona'l use chapter of the code, not the criteria outlined by the Urban
Design Guide P1an--the bubble is classified as a temporary structure which doesnot count as enclosed floor space. Section 18.04.290 defines "seasonal use orstructure as:
A temporary covering erected over a recreational emenity, such as a sw'immingpool or tennis court, for the purpose of expanding their use to the cold weathermonths. Such seasonal covers may not be in place for more than seven consecutive
months of any twelve-month period. For the purposes of this title, a seasonal
use or structure shall not constitute site coverage and shall not be subjectto building bulk control standards. Any seasonal use or structure shall requirea conditional use pennit...
Since a seasonal structure is not subject to bulk control standards, such as enclosedfloor area, it is not subject to the Vai'l vil'l age Design criteria. However, the
Commercial Core I district does'l ist several special c6nditiona'l use criteria inSection .|8.24.070. These criteria are listed below.
CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA
I.In consideringdistrict, the
A. Effects of
The bubble
an application for a conditional use permit within Commercial Core Ifollowing development factors are applicable:
vehicular traffic on Commercial Core I district
has no direct influence on traffic.
a ovehicular traffic in Conrnercial Core I
will not reduce or increase traffic in
non-essential off-street parking.
L\/gyc (,L.U|JIg _a-- ll t)lv.-
the Commercial Core.
B.Reduction of
This project
Reduction of
No influence.
D. Control of delivery, pickup, and service vehicles..
F.
No influence.
Development of public spaces for use by pedestrians.
The bubble is not adjacent to any major pedestrian way.
Continuance of the various commercial , residential , and public uses in Commercial
Core I district so as to maintain the existing character of the area.
The bubble will not interfere with the various commercial , residential andpublic uses in the Vi11age. The bubble will allow a recreational use to be
continued throughout the year.
Control quality of construction, architectural design, and landscape designin Cormercial Core I so as to maintain the existing character of the area.
The quality and design of the bubble should be careful ly reviewed by the 0esign
Review Board. Also, the continued quality of thi s structure over the yearswill depend on maintenance procedures. The applicant should noi allow the
bubble to deteriorate.
H. Effects of no'ise, odor, dust, smoke, and other factors on the environntent of
Commercial Core I district.
The bubble will not produce any odor, dust or smoke. The mechanical
systems which support the air supported structure are fairly quiet.
II. The conditional use criteria, as outlined in Chapter .l8.60, should also be used
to,evaluate the pool bubble.
Upon review of Chapter .|8.60, the Department of Community Development recommends
approval of the conditjonal use permit based on the following factors:
Consideration of Factors :
Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the town.
The code has provided for seasonal recreational structures as long as they
rneet the conditional use criteria. A properly designed pool bubb'le will enhance
the amenities of the Lodqe.
The effect of the use on liqht and air. distribution of population, transportation
Tacr l'llles, ulrlrtres. schools. Darks and recreatlon factllttes, utllltles,ralcrt tLtes, utrrtrrtes, scnools. parKS ano recreaEton Tactt-tf,tes, urrtrLteS,
scnools, parKs ano recreation faclllttes. and otner publlc tacr lrEres anoscnools, parKs ano recreation faclllttes. and otner publlc tact ltEtes ano
lrpublic facilities neffi
E.
b.
The bubble willl have slight to negligible influence on the above factors.
a
q
Lodse fle -3- 7/1s/82
Effect traffai c wi th rti cul ar reference to t'ion, automoti ve andestrnsatety a con ven ence raTtlc ? low a control . access . maneuvera-remova sn0w rom sEreet an rKlnq areas.
Lodge maintenance crews wil'lperimeter of the bubble.
have to periodically remove snow from the
a
a
Effect u n the character of the in which the ro
renc luol n e scale an seo use ]n a
The Lodge bubb'le wil'l be
rounded by the Lodge, andside. The bubble witl bebe tucked away so it willIf Harry's Bar is built,
fa'irly inconspicuous. 0n three sidesfaces the rear of the Lazier Arcadevisible from the Village plaza; butby no means dominate the views fromthe bubble will be entirely screened
use is to be I ocated
0n surrou nq uses.
it will be sur-
on the fourth
the bubble willthe plaza.
from the Plaza.
sed
Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to theproposed use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Community Development recommends that the conditional usepermit be approved based on the foilowing findings:
That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of thisorornance and the purposes of the district in which the site'is located.
That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it wouldbe operated or maintained would not be detrimental to ihe puUlii treitttt, iut"ty,or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improviments in the'vi;i;iii.
That the.proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions ofthis ordinance.
The staff recormends that one stipulation be attached topermi t:
l. That the structure will be erected the week priorwil'l be removed the week following ski seasoh each
the conditional use
to Thanksgiving and
year.
Eorvrurvo II. Dna.enR, JR.
P.O. BOX 166e
vArr4 cor-oR.A'rlo 81667
PEONE (808' 476.1a14
August 2, 1982
Mr. Dick RyanDirector-Department of Conmunity Developrnent
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road WestVai1, Colorado 8165 7
Re: World Forun
Dear Dick:
This letter will confirn our conversati I July 29, L982relating to the use of national f1 ticipantsil, Augustin the World Forum to be held at t
l-3- 1.6 , 1982. The current plan ca -play of thenational flags (about 1-Z in nunber) in a fan shaped displayof 3 x 5 foot flags over the main entrance way to the Lodge
and also a display of the same size flags on the mountain siderail on the terrace above the international room.
This use has been now verbally approved by you and we under-stand that your approval is sufficient for conpliance withthe provision of the Vail Sign Code, Title 16, Town of Vail
Ordinance and Section 1"6.20.030 in particular. If there are
any questions, please advise me at once.
Drager, Jr.
EHD/nc
cc: T. LobergJ. Horan Kates
s'x:COND FII)OR
\/AIL NATIONAI.
BAI\IK BLDG.
yours
Eputrrvu If. Dna,onn, Jn.
ATTORI|ITY AI|ID COI'NSEII)R
P.(). BOf( 166e
\/AII4 C9LORAIX) ATA67
PIIoNE €O$ a7G1g14
July 29, 1982
Mr. Dick Ryan
Di rectorDepartnent of
Town of Vail75 S. FrontageVai1, Colorado
Dear Dick:
stcrol\rD rlooR
\/AIL NATIONAT-
BANI( BI,DO.
Conmunity Development
Road West
81657
0n Monday, July 26, at the conclusion of the hearing on theconditional use pernit, by the Planning and EnvironrnentalConnission, Lodge Properties noved to continue the hearinguntil August 9. The reason for this postponenent, was toperrnit a reappraisal of our desires and advisability of seekingfinal approval of a bubble to cover only one-half of or all ofthe Lodge Poo1.
We have now reviewed the criteria discussed by the Planning
and Environrnental- Cornmission and our needs and will stand withour original request for a conditional use pernit for a bubbleto cover only one-half of the swimrning pool.
Jr.
EHD/nc
cc: Alan TofoyaThor Loberg
yours
Drager,
Steve Sheridan
5. Request for exterior alteration and modification
remode'l the second floor office space for Christy
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Ju'ly 26, I9B2
1:30 pm Site Inspections: Ipanema, Christy's, Lion's Pride
3:00 pm
l. Apprdval of minutes of meeting of July .'12, 1982.
Z. Request for approval of conversion of'19 apartments at the Inn at West Vail.
Apflicant: Jimes Bapy Craddock, d/b/a Craddock Development Company
3. Request for approva'l for conversion to time-sharing for Ipanema Condominiums.
Applicant: Daymer Corporation
4. Request for exterior alteration and modification in CCII District in order
to:'expand the first floor shops in the Lions Pride Building. APplicant:
in CCI District in order to
Sports in the Plaza Lodge
Published in the Vail Trail July 23, 1982
Bu'i'lding. Appl icant: Christy Sports
6. Request for conditional use permit in order to construct a temporary winter
tinie enclosure over one-half'of the Lodge at Vail swinrming pool
Applicant: Lodgd Properties, Inc.
7. Request for amendments to the municipa] code section '17.40.075
Coridominium Conversion--Lodge and Accommodation Units to clari.fy wording anc
to reflect the original intent of the ordinance. Also an amedment to section
18,22.020 Permitted Uses in the Pub'lic Accommodation District to make it clear
that only units without kitchen facilities (i.e. accommodation units) will be
a'llowed in the PA District. Applicant: Town of Vail
lGl'0RANDUM
T0: Planning and Environmental Commissi6n
FROM: Community Development lhpartment
DATE: July 15, 1982
SUBJECT: Application to erect an air-supported structure to be used as a winter-time enclosure over half of the Lodge at Vail swirming pool.Appllcant: Lodge at Vail, Inc.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE:
The project is essentiall.y a bubble to b9 placed over half of the swiruning pool atthe_Lodge at vail. The dimensions of this'structure are approximaieii,iii-rE"i'by 50 feet by 15 feet high. This is a seasonal recreationii strugtura which willDe erected the week prior to Thanksgiving and wil'l be removed the week fo'l'lowingski season each year. The bubble ii a w6ite, translucent, rinviliiiild ;;ii;;t1..
PROCEDURE
Planning Cormission review of this project is subject to the criteria out'linedln the conditiona'l use chapter of the iode, not tli Criieiita outiinea ov-1ie-uroanDesign Guide Plan--the bubble is c'tassifiei ai a iempoii"v'structure which doesnot count as enclosed floor space. Section 18.04.29b defines ',seasonal use oi-structure as:
A temporary covering erected over a recreationa'l emenity, such as a swirmingpool. or tennis court,_for the purpose of expanding theii use to the cold weathermonths. Such seasona] covers inay'not be in'plii."roi-niore than ieven-conlecutivefi,nths of any twelve-month period. For the iurposei of this ittte, i iiisonaruse or structure shall not constitute site cbveiage and shal'l not 5e suUjeitto building bulk control standards. Any seasonal-use o" structure shall-iiquirea conditional use permit...
Slnce a seasonal structure is not subject to bulk control standards, such as enclosedfloor area, it is not subject to the Viii vitii6; il;ig;'ciiteria. However, theConrprcia'l Core I districl does list several spEcial-c6noiiionat use criteria inSectionl8.24.070.Thesecriteriaare-iistedbe1ow
CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA
I.In consideringdlstrict, the
A. Effects of
The bubble
-an_application for a conditional use permit within commercial core Ifollowing development factors are applicable:
vehicular traffic on Commercial Core I district
has no direct influence on traffic.
Lodge Bubble -2- 7/15/82
Reduction of vehicular traffic in Cormercial Core I
This project will not reduce or increase traffic in the Commercial Core.
Reduction of non-essential off-street parking.
No inf'luence.
D. Control of del ivery, pickup, and service vehic'les..
No influence.
Deve'lopment of public spaces for use by pedestrians.
The bubble is not adjacent to any major pedestrian way.
Continuance of the various cormercial , residential , and public uses in Ccxmercia'l
Core I district so as to maintain the ex'isting character of the area.
The bubble will not interfere with the various connercial, residential and
publ'ic uses in the Vi1lage. The bubble will a]]ow a recreational use to be
continued throughout the year.
Control quality of constluction, architectural design, and landscape design
in Comnercial Core I so as to maintain the existing character of the area.
Thgquality and design of the bubble should be carefully reviewed by the Design
Revidw Board. Also, the continued quality of this structure over the years
wlll depend on maintenance procedures. The applicant should not allow the
bubb'le to deteriorate.
H. Effects of noise, odor, dust, smoke, and other factors on the. environment of
Cormercial Core I district.
The bubble will not produce any odor, dust or smoke. The mechanical
systems which support the air supported structure are fairly quiet.
II. The conditional use criteria, as outlined in Chapter 18.60, should also be used
to'evaluate the pool bubble.
Upon review of Chapter 18.60, the Department of Community Deve'lopment recormends
approval of the conditional use permit based on the following factors:
Consideration of Factors
Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the town.
The code has provided for seasonal recreationa'l structures as long as they
reet the conditional use criteria. A properly designed pool bubble will enhance
the amenities of the Lodge.
fect of the use on 'li t and air distribution of ulation
es. ut recreall0n ties. ut
The bubble wll'l'l have slight to negligible influence on the above factors.
B.
c.
E.
F.
G.
ano recreatl0n tac
rtati on
traffai c with
an satety a con ven
remova I o snow rom stree rKlnq areas.
Lodsfubble -3- 7llsl8z
rticu'lar reference to congestion, automotive and
ence raTTlc T low controt, access, maneuvera-
Lodge maintenance crews will have to periodically remove snow from theperimeter of the bubble.
the character of the in which the use is to be 'located
surr0u uses.
Ihe Lodge bubble will be
rouilded by the Lodge, andslde. The bubble wi]t Uebe tucked away so it willIf Harry's Bar is built,
fair'ly inconspicuous. 0n three sides it will be surrfaces the rear of the Lazier Arcade on the fourthvisible from the Village plaza; but the bubble willby no means dominate tfie views from the plaza.the bubble wi'll be entirely screened froir the plaza.
Wd criteria as the cqmission deems applproposed use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Community Development recormends that the conditional usepemit be approved.based on ttre foilowing findingi:
That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of thisordinance and the purposes of the district in which ttre iiie'is'locateo. -'-'-
That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it wouldbe operated or maintained woutd not be oetiimeniii'il-;h";ttiil ri.iriri,"iiiltv,or welfare or materially injurious to propertiei or-improvEments in ttre'viiiniiv.
That the-proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions ofthis ordinance.
The staff recommends that one stipulation be attached to the conditional useperml t:
l. That the structure will be erected the week prior to Thanksgiving andwill be removed the week fouowins itii ieiJofi .iinl.ir.
Date June 28 1982
APPLICATION
CONDITIONAL
FORM FOR
USE PERMIT
t.This procedure is reguired for any proiect required to obtain a
Conditional Use Permit.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT Lodge Properties, Inc.
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Drive PHONE 476-s0ll
c.
B.NAME OF APPLICANTlS REPRESENTATTVE Edmund Drager, Jr.
ADDRESS 108 South Frontaqe Road. Vail co PHoNE 476-1314
AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER
SIGNATURE Thor Loberg
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Drive PHONE 476-s011
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Drive. Vail, Colorado
LECAL DESCRIPTION Lot ABC, Block 5C, Filing Vail Village First
FEE: Check for $102.00 previously submitted.
A list: of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the
subject property and their addresses is attached (10 names).
This project includes the erection of an air-supported structure
approximately 40rx 50rx l5thigh to be used as a temporary winter
time enclosure over one-half the Lodge at Vail swimming pool . Thestructure will be erected the week prior tolThanksgiving and will
be removed the week following the closing of the ski season each
year.
The use of an air-supported structure at the Lodge swimming pool
has no impact on surrounding properties and is therefore compatible
with other properties in the vicinity.
See attached drawings (four copies).
See attached drawings (four copies).
E.
F.
A.il.
B.
c.
ArJr.cgr.ir ,.l,oa*r,' ;,r,,,r;..s ro rHE Lo IDGE A] vA IL
Trre Llrriled Slates Foresl ServiceP.O. [-.ox 190
l,?inlurn, Coloracio E16q5
Riva Ridge South Ownerrs AssociationlTlt Core Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Rir.a Ridge North.Orvnerrs Associationi74 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Sitinrark Lodge
Robert Fritch
lD3 E, Gore Creek DiveVail, Colorado 81557
Gore Creek Plaza Building
Jack Fritzlen
t93. E. Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Bell Tower Building
Clark Willingham
1300 Eryan Towers
Dallas, Texas 75207
Lazier Arcade
Bob Lazier r '.1P. o. Box 1325 ol '' + tc v
Vail, Coloradi 81658
One Vail Place
Vail AssociatesP.O. Box 7Vail, Colorado 81658
Lodge Apartment Ownerrs Association
17lt Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Lodge South
'174 Gore Creek Drive 'Vail, Colorado 81557
\
'/1 , (r,/1
)/t /r'-
[]l lrt 0(
tDate
| . This procedure is required for any proiect required to obtain a
Conditional Use Permit.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT Lodge Properties, Inc.
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Drive PHONE 476-5011
June 28 r 982
APPLICATION
CONDITIONAL
FORM FOR
USE PERMIT
B. NAME OF APPLICANTIS REPRESENTATIVE
ADDRESS 108 South Frontage Road, Vail,
Edmund Drager, Jr.
co PHoNE 476-1314
E.
F.
C. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER
SIGNATURE Thor Loberg
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Drive PHONE 476-5011
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Drive, Vail, Colorado
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot ABC, Block sC, Filing Vail Village First
FEE: Check for $102.00 previously submitted.
A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the
subject property and their addresses is attached (10 names).
This project includes the erection of an air-supported structure
approximately 40rx 50rx 15r high to be used as a temporary winter
time enclosure over one-half the Lodge at Vail swimming pool . The
structure will be erected the week prior to Thanksgiving and will
be removed the week following the closing of the ski season each
year.
The use of an air-supported structure at the Lodge swimming pool
has no impact on surrounding properties and is therefore compatible
with other properties in the vicinity.
See attached drawings (four copies).
See attached drawings (four copies) .
A.lt.
B.
c.
i.iir.ca'., l',rr*T' or, r,r i.s ro rHE L tODG E ;.T vAIL
T lrr- Uniled States Forest ServiceP.O. Box r90
,i,iinturn, Colcrracio t'l 6lt5
Riva Ridge South Ovrnerrs Associalion
174 Gore Creek l.triveVail, Colorado t,lE57
Riva Ridge North On,nerrs Associationi74 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Sitzmark Lodge
Robert Fritch
lE3 E. Gore Creek DiveVail, Colorado 81657
Gore Creek Plaza BuilcJing
Jack Fritzlen
193 E. Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81557
Bell Tower Building
Clark Willingham
1300 Eryan Towers
Dalfas, Texas 75201
Lazier Arcade
Bob LazierP.O. Box 1325
Vail, Coloradi 81558
One Vail PlaceVail AssociatesP.O. Box 7Vail, Colorado 81558
Lodge Apartment Orvnerrs Association
174 Gore Creek Drive\rail, Colorado 81657
Lodge South
174 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81557
I
i
I
o
te,}
APPLICATION
CONDITIONAL
FORM FOR
USE PERMIT
t.
Da June 28 1982
This procedure is reguired for any profect required to obtain a
Conditional Use Permit.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT Lodge Properties, lnc.
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Drive PHONE tl76-5011
B. NAME OF APPLICANTTS REPRESENTATIVE Edmund Drager, Jr.
ADDRESS 108 South Frontage Road, Vail, CO PHONE 476-1314
C. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER
SIGNATURE Thor Loberg
ADDRESS 174 East Core Creek Drive PHONE 475-501r
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Drive. Vail Colorado
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot ABC, Block 5C, Filing Vail Village First
FEE: Check for $102.00 previously submitted.
A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the
subject property and their addresses is attached (10 names).
This project includes the erection of an air-supported structure
approximately 40'x 50rx 15'high torbe used as a temporary winter
time enclosure over one-half the Lodge at Vail swimming pool . The
structure will be erected the week prior to Thanksgiving and will
be removed the week following the closing of the ski season eachyear.
The use of an air-supported structure at the Lodge swimming pool
has no impact on surrounding properties and is therefore compatible
with other properties in the vicinity.
See attached drawings (four copies).
See attached drawings (four copies).
E.
F.
A.il.
B.
c.
a,,. '
o
;.DJr.cE!,rT ,,Q,ra*r,,' or,:.ai.s ro rHE LoDcE AT 'ArL
Tlre t-lrrited States Foresl Servic,eP.O. Box 190li'iinlurn, Coloracio tl6q5
Riva Ridge South Ownerrs Associalion
174 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Riva Ridge North Orvnerrs Associationi74 Gore Creek DriveVail. Colorado 81657
Sitzmark Lodge
Robert Fritch
183 E. Gore Creek DiveVail, Colorado 81557
Core Creek Plaza Building
Jack Fritzlen
193. E. Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 8l 657
Bell Tower Building
Clark Willingham
1300 Bryan Towers.
Dalfas, Texas 75201
Lazier Arcade
Bob LazierP.O. Box 1325Vail, Coloradi 81558
One Vail Place
Vail Associates
P.O. Box 7Vail, Colorado 81658
Lodge Apartment Orynerrs Association
'l 74 Gore Creek Drive
\rail, Colorado 81657
Lodge South
174 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
o
ON FO
/
B. NAME OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANTIS
500 Lionshead
f Application [a1 20, 1962
APPLICATI RM FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I (CCI)
l. This procedure is required foralteration of an existing building which adds or
removes any enclosed floor area or outdoor patio or replacement of an existing
building strill Ue subject to review bythe Planning and Environmental Commission.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT UAg" p.operties, I
PHONE476-s011
REPRESENTATIVE Ruoff/Wentworth Architects AlA, PC
ate oo
Mall, Vail, CO 81657 PHONE 476-30s1
C. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPER
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Dr.
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
co 816s7 PHONE 476-soll
ntr,E.
u if'z/r" F.
ADDRESS lodqe at Vail 174 Gore Creek Drive Vail, Colorado 81657
LEGAL DESCRIPTTON TTacts A,B,C Block 5C Vail Villaqe First Fill
FEE: Check for $102. 00 enclosed.
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY: See attached improvement survey prepared by
Johnson Kunkel 6 Associates dated 12118180, revised 1/1/81.
G. LIST OF NAMES OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: See AttAChEd IiSt Of
10 names.
ll. SITE PLAN: See attached drawings (4 copies)
IIt. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the erection of an air-supported structure 40t x 501
by approximatety 15r high to be used as a winter-time enclosure over one
half of the Lodge at Vail swimming pool.
III
II
f
tV. URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONST
A. Pedestrianization:
The proposed structure is not adiacent to any public pedestrian way and
therefore has no impact upon pedestrianization.
B. Vehicle Penetration:
The proposed structure is completely removed from and has no impact
upon vehicle traffic.
C. Streetscape Framework:
The proposed structure is completely removed from any street.
D, Street Enclosurer
The proposed structure has no impact on street enclosure.
E. Street Edge:
The proposed structure has no impact on street edge considerations.
F. Building Height r :
The height of the proposed structure is 1510". The height of the lowest
adjacent building is 32r0rr.
G. Views:
There are no designated view corridors in the areai
H. Service and Delivery:
There will be no change in existing service and delivery functions at
the lodge.
l. Sun/Shade:
The proposed building will not cast any shadow on adjacent properties
or R.O:W.
V. ZONING CHECK
Zoning: Commercial Core I
18.24.090 Lot Area E Site Dimensions Existing lot area: 132,523
square feet
l&24.100 Setbacks None Required
18.24. 120 Height Existing: 55r at main wing
of The Lodge, 99r at the
Lodge South.
o18.24.130 Density Control
,
18.24. 140 Reconstruction of Existing Uses NA
808 of lot Area
80E (132,523) = l05,0t8
allowed GRFA
Existing r 151,632 sq, ft.
GRFA in The Lodge at Vail
and The Lodge South.
246,340 total square footagr
including garages and
conditional and permitted
uses.
80E (132,5231 = 106,018 sq. fl
allowed coverage.
Existing Coverage: 49,958
sq. ft.
18.24. 150 Coverage
18.2t1.170 Landscape s Site Development Unchanged
18.24.180 Parking 6 Loading Unchanged
_
ADJACENT PROPERTY OI'JNERS TO THE LODGFAT VAIL
The United States Forest Service
'P.O. Box 190
Minturn, Colorado 81645
Riva Ridge South Owner's Association
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Riva Ridge North Ownerrs Association
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Sitzmark Lodge
Robert Fritch
183 E. Gore Creek Dive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gore Creek Plaza Building
Jack Fritzlen
I93. E. Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Bell Tower Building
Clark Willingham
1300 Bryan Towers
Dallas, Texas 75201
Lazier Arcade
Bob Lazier
P.O. Box 1325
Vail, Coloradi 81658
One Vail Place
Vail Associates
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
Lodge Apartment Ownerls Association
lTtl Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Lodge South
lTlt Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
o",t APl>lrcation!a'1 20, u4_
tt
t.
APPLTCATlON FORI'I FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
oR MODIFICATIONS lN COI\4MERCIAL coRE | (ccl)
Thisprocedureis.requiredforatterationofanexistingbuiIdingwhich
removes any enclosed floor area or outdoor Patio or reptacement of an
building shall be trUi""i-to ieview bythe Planning and Environmental
The apptication rvi|| not be accepted untiI a|t information is submitted,
A. NAME OF APPLICANT
adds or
existing
Commission.
B.
c.
NAME OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANTIS
500 Lionshead
co 81657 PHONE 476- 50'l I
Creek Drive Vail Colorado 8'l 557
ADDRESS 174 East Gore Creek Dr', Vail, CO 81657 PHONE476-501I
REPRESENTATIVE Ruoff/Wt"t*otth Atthit C
PHONE 476-3051
AUTHORI ZAT ION OF PROPER'TJ-OWNER
SIGNATURE Thor Lober
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS 124 Eaq! tqt'e-greek
ADDRESS Lodge at Vail 174 Gore
LEGAL DESCRIPTIoN TryS!q-4.8-.9 Block sc Vail Villaqe First Fili
E.
F.
FEE: Check for $102.00 enclosed'
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY: See attached improvement .t:1Y9I prepared by
iohnson Kunkel E Associates dated 12118180, revised 1l1l8l
C. LIST OF NAMES OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
l0 names.
ll. SITE PLAN: See attached drawings (4 copies)
See attached list of
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION :
Thisprojectinc|udestheerectionofanair-supportedstructure40'-x'50'
bv approxit"t.iy li; high to be used as a winter-time enclosure over one
rtlriiF the Lodge at Vail snimming pool'
IV. URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:
A. Pedestrianization :
The proposed structure is not adjacent to any public pedestrian way and
therefore has no impact upon pedestrianization.
B. Vehicle Penetration :
The proposed structure is completely removed from and has no impact
upon vehicle traffic.
C. Streetscape Framework:
The proposed structure is completely removed from any street.
D. Street Enclosure:
The proposed structure has no impact on street enclosure.
E. Street Edge:
The proposed structure has no impact on street edge considerations.
F. Building Height: :
The height of the proposed structure js 1510". The height of the lowest
adjacent building is 32'0".
G. Views:
There are no designated view corridors in the area.
H. Service and DeliverY:
There will be rn change in existing service and detivery functions at
the lodge.
l. Sun/Shade:
The proposed building will not cast any shadow on adjacent properties
or R.O:W.
V. ZONING CHECK
Zoning: Commercial Core I
18.24.090 Lot Area E Site Dimensions Existing lot area: 132,523
square feet
18,24.100 Setbacks None Required
18.24. 120 Height Existing: 55' at main wing
of The Lodge, 99r at the
Lodge South.
('-
18. 2q. 130 DensitY Control
18.24. lltO Reconstruction of Existing Uses NA
808 of Lot Area
809 (132,523) = 106,018
allowed GRFA
Existing : 151 , 632 sg. ft.
GRFA in The Lodge at Vail
and The Lodge South.
246,340 total square footagt
including garages and
conditional and Permitted
uses.
80E (132,523) = 106,018 sg. ft
allowed coverage.18.2{.150 Coverage
Existing Coverage: 49,958
sq. ft.
18.24. 170 Landscape 6 Site Development Unchanged
t8.21t.180 Parking 6 loading Unchanged
ooADJACENT PROPERTY OIiIiETiS TO THE LODGE AT vAIL
The United States Foresl Service' P.O. Box 190
lrlinturn, Coloracio 8lGlt5
Riva Ridge South Ownerts Association
174 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81557
Riva Ridge North Owner's Association
174 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Sitzmark Lodge
Robert Fritch
183 E. Gore Creek Dive
, V"il, Colorado 81657
i Gore Creek Plaza BuildingI Jack Fritzlen
193. E. Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Bell Tower Building
Clark Willinghan
1300 Bryan Towers.
Dallas, Texas 75201
Lazier Arcade
Bob Lazier
P.O. Box 't325
Vail, Coloradi 81658
One Vail Place
Vail AssociatesP.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 8'l 658 :
Lodge Apartment Ownerrs Association
174 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Lodge South
lTlt Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
l..1
t.
Date of APPlrcation I""aY 20, 199?
APPLICATION FORM FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
OR IVIODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I (CCI)
This procedure is required for alteration of an existing building which
removes any enclosed floor area or outdoor Patio or reptacement of an
building shall be ,rO;""i-to t""1"* bythe Planning and Environmental
The application lvill not be accepted until all information is submitted'
adds or
existing
Commission.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT erties , I nc.
co 815s7 PHONE 476- 501 I
B.
c.
NAME OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT'S
500 Lionshead
REPRESENTATIVE n,roff/Wttt*otth Atthi C
PHONE 476-3051
AUTHORI ZAT IO}.1 OF PROPERTJ-.OWNER
SICNATURE Thor Lober
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
co 816s7 PHONE 476-s0l I
Colorado 81657
ADDRESS 174 East Gore
ADDRESS 174 East qSIg-gIeeE
ADDRESS l-odge at Vail Gore Creek Drive, Vail
LEGAL DESCRIPTIoN rfeSlg-A B.C Block 5C, Vail Viltage First Fili
FEE: Check for 5102.00 enclosed
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY: See attached improvement .tYfY:I prepared by
jof,r'rron Kunkel E Associates dated 12/18/80' revised 111181
c.L|sToFNAMESoFADJACENTPRoPERTYoWNERS:See.attached|istof
10 names.
ll. SITE PLAN: See attached drawings (4 coPies)
E.
F.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project inctudes the erection of an
bv approximately 15' high to be used as
rtlilt *t" Lodgje at Vail snimming pool'
air-suPPorted structure 40t x 50t
a winter-time enclosure over one
IV. URBAN DESICN CONSIDERATIONS:
A. Pedestrianization :
The proposed structure is not adjacent to any public pedestrian way and
therefore has no impact upon pedestrianization.
B. Vehicle Penetration:
The proposed structure is completely removed from and has no impact
upon vehicle traffic.
C. Streetscape Framework:
The proposed structure is completely removed from any street.
D. Street Enclosure:
The proposed structure has no impact on street enclosure.
E. Street Edge:
The proposed structure has no impact on street edge considerations.
F. Building Height:
The height of the proposed structure js l5r0r'. The height of the lowest
adjacent building is 32t0r'.
G. Views:
There are no designated view corridors in the area.
H. Service and Detivery: I
There will be no change in existing service and delivery functions at
the lodge.
l. Sun/Shade:
The proposed building will not cast any shadow on adiacent properties
or R.O.W.
V. ZONING CHECK
Zoning: Commercial Core I
18.24.090 Lot Area 6 Site Dimensions Existing lot area: 132,523
square feet
18.24. 100 Setbacks None Required
18.24.120 Height Existing: 55r at main wing
of The Lodge, 99' at the
Lodge South.
I
18.24. 130 DensitY Control
| 8. zlt. 150 Coverage
18.2q.170 . LandscaPe E Site Development Unchanged
18.2rt.180 Parking E Loading Unchanged
18.2t1. 140 Reconstruction of Existing Uses NA
803 of Lot Area
80ed (132,523) = 106,018
allowed GRFAExisting: 151,632 sq. ft,
GRFA in The Lodge at Vail
and The lodge South.
246,340 total square footagt
including garages and
conditional and Permitted
uses.
8OE (132,523) = l06,0t8 sq. ft
allowed coverage.
Existing Coverage: q9,958
sq. ft.
_-, I
vvADJACEi.IT PRC,PERTY Of,i..Ef\5 TO THE LODGE A'I VAIL
The United States Forest Servicei P.O, Box'l 90[|inturn, Colorado 81645
Riva Ridge South Ownerrs Association
174 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Riva Ridge North Owner's Association
174 Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81657
Sitzmark Lodge
Robert Fritch
I83 E. Gore Creek Dive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gore Creek Plaza Building
Jack Fritzlen
193. E, Gore Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81557
Bell Tower Building
Clark ltfillingham
1300 Bryan Towers.
Dallas, Texas 75201
Lazier Arcade
Bob LazierP.O. Box 1325
Vail, Colora{i 81558
One Vail Place
Vail AssociatesP.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
Lodge Apartment Ownerrs Association
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Lodge South
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail , Colorado 81657
qroiect Appllcation
Project Name:tul/rV O tL ALT. !? AT'r ; v-s Tc ". )p v-[ A7 vl\/t-
projectDescriplon. AsD APfr t/ - f oo -F '>-t ,.;Fct, .+!:! i .i+ r' . AELBL'.rL6' ..iEiiii . ADD F<+TEQ/uR- sTAtR i\ 7- r/r'7i4-r'/A';'/o/{'\L 7-/-/+?A(E
Contact person and phone AL/o/:+/LJE^/ f L<,toR 7 /-r At/ ( )4 - 4 7' 6 3 a! /
Aupci-E A7 VAtt- 4Zo-Jc,//
Architect. Address and Phone:
3oo a/DMSr(tao flAt L
tlo tr tJEvTOOF
lA, L
e(htTrCTS
. ,ffjr -',1 A, B,c
Legal Description: Lot -1/A tt- l/-l4c L- / ST zon"@5 -cBlock Filing
Comments:At odr<.T AD/.t/M- /7c't/fq)
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
..,{-,Approva,
A4avPl t NqE9.
,wr4qf
TZEI ra.;^t
E>,4ofu/, 4^6-
rr4vlS tua^ Ptt-tu
,qtPPAoP t+fL
/aHt)/JS ts4 ,
')4ooF <rzrTf At/+
,o tn
fflA conrz-B*)T E7pAEssr o a'J , 4Ab
o6J9>nua_ , fen_ zooF s /t>1 TtrL
y t Lu4 t E_ / S fo Fe4ln .1
co A g6 Te*tfL,y L/Ht P) r'g t" 6t/ct<rtaa'.o
Por T$6- ryuc-+f oEaTvzg ,eNO
pgptfi-frfrueg STzeEr gu2eD- , 4t4A
To filOto aDoFs tl/Hlo t+ ,reg-
To 574/4 O,T t >J tO lu tQo 42-t--> 6"<
471sffi4uf aJf4.q utS ur'rry
FrZotl THe oufr?-eo-- oHe-L+ f/ E-.- t! -
f 3E L\E/E TaqT T0L5 .rzaoq ,oaEs
P13qary7 ftCu4u/y fr-aP/ odfru4cc-
cc/fr2tfo7944
"
ll
Wf rzooFS 14Fl 4L ,frvNo
tH TtlE- ylrt-Q 6E 6(,T THf> /?zE_
QAflea-gtAal Co^1.5t e%.LEr4 To 6E o,T ttOF c)e.L,ec;Te ?L 4pa 2NA-P.29,z14TE.
Of LE4JT' aEnt.t4L t-tsr oF
CototL. , HftfEttaf u /s N e f- pfo ,
Lonaa4 F) c-A w rff) U?'tL nLL4bE t/A6e,s
oESt(tts 'utroL Puers oNa ofurc<t €otJs/oErL-
lTtorlS
l, 5.J b -ArL€q coIllcf ptS
(DtoL &Aa
4LTt)CUb tJ T+le U,L.LAUB ft424 tS p,ft o*J€<r
lA $qE- €;.Je, ,q>t4 @HcS,?f , , do Sf6c-r Frc-
ot+e4*+) Caotof t tt4 65 4L6. 6lv6tg foa,- J.Hts
5?+€ .
L , Psets T ruo H RaTrc kt
TtaL weww,+J 6ET,J€Etg
4q<aet 6utuo rqb 4Ao
OF c,ta.,64$ af,_gt|u,AJ
TtfE rfi 21t/r<
|t+F Lcto 6&
ftz*vnEa*7 +s STn+6c4,aE -
6J tsLtTv+.,vt rT H t6rtf 6F
Atu*tc-- afrzrl ET&.-PIL Eu s>l o\
faw4;2 4sa
7Etrt4v /-ool(tt)(,
5. F4c-+o 2
TQcr-- ,741
q &-ae -t=+c4_eEt
GE
.-T
'4ILoa
orLo ^Po T1/+r4.)
4r-{)
To
/\( Acc-ts"-ca )A€U T|o^9*5 t,t&
/oa{-
{,1( . ^<,1
?' ^6 l'":$'l'f
f/4H 6oa.g t6agEr- eNvE
EUH\NT+TEO, Tr,ls ,5 Ardr
PEO Es Trztt4q qcL.Ees t4,+t
LoObL , ANO THE AEflovAL
w4Lt< dtLL AdT p$r2v4
5tctt+lFl ctqBT P@es rrz4tlA
,sH,Jt t- 66-
A /1AJP4-
To TiE
eF fDE
A ,+G-
E_oo,TE .
.r-rl,"t"ff
{*';1,
%;ffi'Wl-''Nfl
"pft
tr
1
,Ea*
.)4)--7*4
' n!*1-,
6- At1QvlvLE s"/^\ Sru;.'O 4A4u> sU.
N(2 .*>c.a-1'-- 4LcE st oa-,at)'J4'+cE -
'\o tv' (-
:'#rq "/-o"
od'
3,
t*d To OlrO lf .
NO ctt+D 6A T[Jr.-OU(DB - @t>C
ct-vf.f- OfZtUf.
4+a+t6 -
St4eeTSLAPE FzAt4Ed*r<,o&r**,,
No c{+4H 6 e Fl.:>Pr-- RoA9,ri
No 4)+H GE
g74f E', FO 0t
Alo c rn$6.f-
ea-os u rLlL ,
Nc>f rrJHffivTHb &---firaf
t-6 sJH 'IaTgr.-
Po
, LO TTTi.
f.tft t/A
HONG
T1O N
c oA}c->
olzh *cA uSL
91-ylaf Sr-S
ota p,tt-wSs4g-'twa//+s 4t+
o f rlu Lt-tot Jtg6 -
z+'Tt4G sdA\
zf
I^t tT I)I-X>rlg
6lt-Ban-sor)
/cJ oc516 c-7
- thr-/d k"4e
\ I Cl LT-)
Af^lr: ttt+- 6 t-E,/ n.I t si.-1
d,otlq- cAf 'L
lotl
-4
c o+@
4.: I{ SUTC k-fT
//-ZP o t+J- ,
w f'l a) q)TYPL -t+Ar 6-
9qfl6t+T /'orlsta6.,t- 47rolL>=
015\un'Vb€C bj 51qa1<t-1t9 s5
#
wrNCoqJ ?rz4,r)'>3 - oon oF
qr\TH c@sf - tr.,rl^lDlt-J OLJ
,--_=-\4,ad cgr)oTN -- t-r-.-=.-----_----_--- -/
c Hen4tf 9,.._
=. EtS,sB V"lSt;ttt4
rl c^, AoOP
oF $JtvOl *)rt -55t4s
rr9 t,o Q--'joFfrAp" s,r*' btE f*Jc.ioA- ,
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
l4arch B, '1982
3:00 p.m.
l. Approva'l of minutes of February 22, 1982
2, Request for a rezone of 1ot l, Vail Vi1'lage 2nd Fi'llng t9 change
from Prinnry/Secondary to Special'Development District with an
underlying zone of High Density Multi-Family to al'low construction
of 5 dwel]ing units. Applicant: Ron J. Byrne
3. Request for a condjtional use permit to construct an office building
on the existing Texaco Statjon site at 953 South Frontage Road West.
Applicant: M & t,t| Venture.
Request for a rezoning of lots I through 5' Cliffside subdivision
from Residentjal Cluster to Single Fam'ily District. Applicants:
Charles Rosenquist, David Co]e, Daryl R. Burns, Phil'lip 0rdway'
Richard Brown.
Request for exterior alteratjon and modification in CCI to allow the
Lod'ge at Vail to construct Harry's Bar. Applicant: Lodge Properties' lnc.
Published in the Vail Trail February 26, 1982.
4.
5.
o
Scott EdwardsWill Trout
Diane Donovan
Duane Piper
Jin Viele
Jin Morgan
ABSENT
Dan Corcoran
The neeting was caLled to order by Duane Piper, vice chairman.
DRAFT
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
ldarch 8, 1982
PRESENT STAFF
Dick Ryan
Peter Patten
Peter Jamar
Betsy Rosolack
COIJNCIL REP
Gail Wahrlich
l. Approval of. qinules of February 22, 1982.
the date typed on the ninutes was February 8, and Betsy
changed to February 22, Diane noved and 'Scott secondedthe correction, and the vote was 6-0 in favor.
2,R uest for a rezone of lot I Vail Vil1a 2nd Fil to chan
licant I
Peter Janar exPlained_the memo, pointing out that the existing house was I duplex.
He poi.nted out the nodel and the p1an, adding that the staff was not in fpvor ofthe rezoning of the special develbprnent distiict. _)
Dick Ryan stressed the concern of the Cotmcil and of nany residents of Vail concerningVailts growth. He quoted from a report of 1977. He added that from this reportthe whole conununity was down zoned to reduc e the nurber of potential units that couldbe built. He added that in 1980 the Town purchased open space for'two reasons: l)to retain the open space and 2) to renove fron the marketplace a nudber of potentialunits. He added that when the hospital land lras being considered for acquisition,the council was concerned that there not be more units built at that t.ine.
Dick also pointed out that the proposal before the board was a significant changefrom what the staff felt was proper for that lot.
Richard Black, architect for the project, showed slides of other buildings that hisfirn had done. He added that the proposal could be nodified if the only issue were
setback concerns. He felt that they needed a certain amount of nass to acconplishtheir architectural objectives, However, he asked if the board'would consider 3units, and Duane answered that they could not answer that. Black felt that theycould not afford to do 2 units. Also that they could not have a transition withonly 2 units .
noted thatto apProve
this should be
the ninutes with
ecial Devel strict with an underlyin
con s truct ion
s/8/82
Discussjon followed concerning the proposed fountain, pavers, setbacks from stream
and west side. Ron Byrne, owne,r, stressed that his driveway was at present a turn-
around"
Ben Boutell, a neighboring property owner, expressed concern that if the zone change
were granted, the other property owners could also ask to have their property zoneddifferently. The staff agreed with his concern. Lynn Price of Beaver Dan Road
stated appreciation of the building but r{as concerned about the fact that norelots would then be rezoned. Morgan Douglas, owner of the lot one renoved fron the
ProPerty in question voiced the sarne concern. Wil 1 expressed concern that a duplex
would not be abLe to accomplish the transition, but also pointed out that the staff
had spent nany hours studying the issue.
Dick felt that although the streetscape in front of this building had been addressed,it was important to get a long tern solution to the streetscape that would deal withall of the properties, rather than dealing with one property at a tine. He addedtlat ar1 improvemert district was needed in order to create some type of streetscapealong the entire Meadow Drive to connect the village and vail Lionshead.Jin Morgan felt that the board could possibly consider a height variance while stayingwithin a duplex. He added that he had been on DRB when Ipanema was being designed
and that when it went through there had been little public i.nput showing concernover the height. He added that this uright be .o*po,rrriir,g the problen by allowing5 units. Dick added that lpanena was first denj.ei by Council ,'and aftei that thedesign was modified and eventualIy approved :by Town -Council
.
Black stated that if his building had been constructed on the Ipanena site, he would
have no reason to be before the board, for the transition would already have beennade, He added that the lot west of lot I was narrow, and that it would be difficultto create nuch arguenent to nake a structure on it larger than a duplex. Jin M.fel.t that r. neverthel ess, the owner of lot I could accomplish the transition with
a duplex. Bl.ack answered that if density $ere the t.rue issue, he could possibly
nake the transition with 3 units. Jim V asked if' Black had looked at what could
have been done with a duplex, and Black answered that the tower and the wrdergroundparking would be lost. Jim V, stated that it seemed that a 4600 square foot building
was quite a lot and that perhaps the desired effect could be accornplished with abuilding of that size which is currently allowed within the duplex zoning on the lot.
Scott felt that density and size were the issues, and that in trying to solve one
problern they were creating another, Diana Don ovan fett that
the project didnrt fit the purpose of a special developnent district, and added that
she felt that Spraddle Creek was a logical place to have a break in the zones.
She agreed that if there is a change in the zoning, .the change woutd sinply creepall along the street. Diane added that it violated several general provis ions ofthe zoning ordinance. She acknowledged dislike of Ipanena, but pointed out that.their landscaping would be a buffer when the trees were fully grown.
I 5 -3- 3/8/82
Duane stated that he felt the effort in transition was a positive one, but pointed
out that a transition did not necessariLy have to be nade with a building, but could
be nade with landscaping and open space as well. He added that transition with
landscaping night be an even better transition. Duane agreed with the nenbers of
the neighborhood, that it would be difficult to stop the rezoning. He added that
he liked the streetscape, though felt it night be a little bit urban for Vail , but
liked the idea that it had been designed and was conplete.
Black asked for reaction to three units, and concern was raised that the neighbors
could then all ask for 3 rmits. Will pointed out that this lot could sinply be
identified as a transition site, and since each case is dealt with separately, each
succeeeding lot wouLd be considered on a case by case issue.
Will felt that either Ipanena or the duplex wds a silly solution because of the scale
junp, He pointed out that the applicant was willing to deal with this Problem,
Dick stated that he could see a raising of the mass on the east side of the site,
but felt it could be done with a duplex.
Jim Morgan noved and Diane seconded to deny approval of the zone change to
Special Development District with an underlying Hi.gh Density l,lultiple Fanily zone
as per the staff rnemo dated I'tarch 4, 1982. The vote was 5-l in favor of denial .Will voted against denial stating that he wouldnrt have supported a five unit buildinB,
but wanted the appl icant to know that he would support a scaled down version, 3 or
possibly 4 units if it were carried out jn the same manner,
Dick reninded the applicant and the audience that this item was to go to the Council
neeting of Ma 6- 1982
I use ernit to construct an office building on the
Front e Road West..Applicant: M Q W Venture.
of0ne
and
licants, Jin Morgan, asked to table this iten.moved
Diane seconded to table it until lUarch 22, The'vote was 5-0 with Jim abstajning.
4. Request..for a'rezoning of lots I through 5, Cliffside subdivision fron Residential
Phi.l_Ordway, .Ri.cheld Brown.
Peter Patten stated that theapplicantswanted to table, but that they had not yet
put this in writing, He reviewed the happenings to date, and added that
the attorney for the adjoining Ridge property ownershad asked to start the proceedings
over again. It was poi.nted out that if the board asked to tab1e, they then
mrst act within 30 days. Diane moved and Jin V seconded to table the iten.
The vote was 6-0 in favor of tabling.
:'
Request for g\ionditi;---.-----------.-:_-'l exaoo gtt1ce .srte a,9
5. Reqge:! for exterior gltera_tign and. nodification in ccr !o allow the Lodgeat Vail fo construct Harry,: Bar. npplicani:-@
Peter Patten explained that the Lodge had cone before the planning Connission inJuIy of l98L with a proposal to add 620 square feet to the Salt Lick dining room.The Planning Comnission disappioved the "ddition with a tie (2-2) vote. Lit.er the'Council overturned the Pl anning Conrnissionts decision by a vot" of Z-0. The presentrequest is to increase the addition fron 620 to 11800 square feet and to add a meetingroon of 884 square feet in the basement.
Bill Ruoff, architect for the project, showed the site plan and explained that theroof wouLd be lower than the existing roof because of rlmoving the parapet. He addedthat a pitched roof didnrt work on the part of the building,6ut tfrit ii the longr-ange plans were allowed, other things could be done. He felt that the treatmentthrough the alleyway would inprove the alley and felt that a shortcut through
t.}t e alley wasntt needed. Diane expressed concern that the building extendeJ thedistance shown, because of blocking a view of the rnountains that included the base.Ruoff stated that it was necessary in order to have the restaurant work. Dianeexpressed the feeling that the addition did not look as though it belonged there,but looked added on and didnrt go with anything else in view.
JinViele questioned the reason for not putting the restaurant on the other sideof the building where the large kitchen was. Ruoff answered that the entry situationwasntt good on that side and that they were trying to accornmodate the future plansso that the restaurant addition would not have to be torn down. He added thaibVenlud$&y the Lodge want.ed a snall convention center in the 'existing courtyard toaccorunodate 600 people--the nax inun nunber who could stay at the Lodge.
The Master Plan was looked at to see if perhaps the restaurant should be consideredin light of the master plan. However, Ruoff itressed that the restaurant additionnust stand on its own. Will asked how high the addition connected to the restauranron the naster plan would be, and Ruoff stated that it would be another story high.
Duane asked the staff if there was a limit to the anount of density added, andDick answered that there was no limit in conrnercial space. Diane rnentioned thatrith- -the open space around the lodge, it didn rt look ls large as it really was.Jiur M, mentioned concern about the sirade onto the Hong Kong cafe and the boardwas shown the shadows on the Hong Kong on March 22 ani Sepi ZS. Ton Gilbertsonof the Hong Kong stated that he had discussed the issue with Ruoff and had decidedthat the_Hong Kong "could live with it," He added that he would have preferredto see the Lodge placed farther back, however.
Discussion followed concerning the staffrs three coriditions, and Ruoff said theappLicant did agree to them,
Will asked if the Urban Design Guide PIan elininated flat roofs, and Dick respondedthat it discouraged flat roofs but that each project had to be ionsideredindividually, will feLt that the flat roof seerned awkward. Rrioff pointed outthat there is a flat_roof there at present, and Duane stated that that yras true,but the new flat roof would be twici as long, Ruoff said that the flat roof workedbest with the existing roof,
PEc -s- )taz
Ruoff stated that this project would be accessed thr';ugh the al1ey during constructiontiut i-n the future al I service would be as it is today, frorn the back or Vail Road.
Jin M, noved to recorunend approval of the exterior alteration and addition ofHarryrs Bar on the eastern side of the Lodge at Vail per the staff nemo dated
March 2, 1982 with the three conditions as stated. Will seconded the notionbut added that he would like to have the rnernbers polled to see how they felt
about approving the adclition without the consideration of the whole naster plan.
Jin M. stated he had no problen rith it as it was, Jim V said that it was difficultfor him to support the plan by itself. Diane agreed with Jim V adding that shedidnrt feel. the building stood by itself. Duane felt he could endorse the addition,without consideration of the master plan, but did wish it did not extend so farout. Will stated that he could support the addition because it. would be betterin the overall schene (he was endoising it in light of the naster pian).
The vote was 3-2 in favor of the addition. For were Jin M, Duane and WitI.
Against were Diane and Jim V., and they felt that they had already stated theirpositions,
Will noved and Jin M. seconded to ad'iourn. Vote was 6-0 to adiourn at 5:50.
t
PTANN
o
SSION
l.
t
3.
4.
5.
ING AND ENVIRONIIIN'TAL COMI"II
February 22, 1982
Election of chairman and vice-chairrnan.
Approval of minutes of neeting of February 8, 1982.
Request to amend the Town of Vail zoning code to add a new zone districtcalled Arterial Business for an area west of Vail Lionshead including VailAssociatesr west day parking lot, Vail Associ.atest shop and yard area, EagleValley Water and Sanitation site, old Town shop site, Chevron site, HolyCross Electricrs yard site, Texaco site, Voliter Nursery site and the Glen Lyonoffice building site.
Request to amend Section 18.54 Design Review Guidelines of the zoni.ng codespecifying information which nust be subnitted with the application t'or designreview board, setting forth design review board procedures and details.
Request to anend the zoning code to include definitions of "najor arcade," I
rrminor arcade" and "anusenent device. " The request is to anend the following
zone distri-cts: Commercial Cores I, II, and fII, corunercial service center,public use, parki.ng district, public accomroodation district, Special Develop-nent Districts 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1.0 and ll. Major arcades will be subject toconditional use review. In CCI and II, major arcades will be restrictedto basenent or garden levels
Request for exterior alteration antl rnodification j-n CCI to rernodel the GalleryBuilding (Ore House Building) to add a condorniniurn on a new thiad level
above grade as well as redesigning the entrance to the Ore House, expandingthe restaurant toward the west and adding and renodeling second flooi officespace. Applicant: Ron H. Riley.
Request for exterior alteration and modification in CCI to renrodel theSlifer Building in order to add storage space on the lst floor, office spaceat the rear of the 2nd floor and a deck and windows on the 2nd floor. Appli-cant: Rod Slifer.
Request for exterior alteration and modification in CCI to al1ow the
Lodge at Vail to Construct Hanyrs Bar, Applicant has requested thatthis item be tabled until the I'larch 8th meeting. Applicant: LodgeProperties, Inc.
6.
7,
8.
eq
a\tt
PLANNING AtlD ENVIR0NI'IENTAI CO|IMISSION
Monday, February 8, 1982
2:00 p,ur.
l{ork session, Architerra project revisions
3:00 p.n.
Public Hearing
l. Approval of minutes of January 25 rneeting.
2. Request for a density control variance in gross residential floor areato construct lofts in 20 units dnd a request for a parking varj.ance forthe Sandstone CreekClubCondornj.niums on lots 84 and 85, Block B,
Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No. 1 Applicant: Vail Ridge'Partnership--
Jack Perlmutter.
3. Request to anend Special Development District 4 to subdivide lot 39,
Glen Lyon subdivision into 2 single family lots from one Priurary,/Secondary
duplex lot. A second arnendment requested is for a setback. changefron the SDD4 requirenent for Area A to enable construction of the parking. structureT'athletj.c club to encroach on the north side. Applicant: AndrewNorris.
4, Request for a conditional use pernit to operate a real estate office
on the basement leveL of the llountain Haus at 292 East lvleadow Drive,Suite #2. Applicant: Earth Sheltered Realty and Investnents, Ltd.
f\
- S[\Ot#. Request for exterior alteration and modification in Commercial Core I
4 &f J for the Lodge at Vail to construct Harryrs Bar. Appli.cant: Lodge Propertie.
I
6. Reguest for exterior alteration and nodification in Conmercial Core Ito allow the Red Lions Inn to enclose with glass the northern portionof their front deck on the west side of the building. Applicant:Jeff SeLby.
Published in the Vail Trail February 5, 1982.
N0TICE IS IILREBY GIVIN that
of the Town of Vail will hold a
18.66.060 of the Zoning Code of
in the Town Council charnbers in
PUIJt.lc No'ft(:l;
thc Plannintl and Environrnental Connission
pubtic hcaring in accordance with Section
the Town of Vail on FebruarY 8, 1982
the Vail Municipal Building.
-
1.
2:00 Work Session Architerra Project Revisions
3:00 Public Hearing
Request for a deng ty control variance in Gross Residential Floor Area
to constTuct lofts in 20 units and a request for a parking variance in accordance
with Section 18.62 of the Vail Mrmicipal Code. The requests are for the
Sandstone Creek Club Condominiums located on lots 84 and 85, Block B,
Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No. 1. Applicant: Vail Ridge Partnership--
Jack Perlmutter.
Request for a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 18.60 of
the Vail Mtrnicipal Code to operate a real estate office on the basenent level
of the Mountain Haus, located in a Public Accorrunodation Zone District at 292
East Meadow Drive, Suite #2. Applicant: Earth Sheltered Realty and
Investnents, Ltd.
Request to anend Special Development District 4 to subdivide lot 39, Glen
Lyon Subdivision into 2 single fanily lots--it is now a Prinary/Secondary duplex
lot. A second anendrnent requested is for a setbback variance from the SDD4
requirementforArea Ataenable construction of the parking structure/athletic
club to encroach on the irorth side. Applicant: Andrew Norris.
4. A request for exterior alteration and rnodification in Comnercial Gore I
zone district for the Lodge at Vail to construct Harryrs Bar. This is in accor-
dance with Section 18.24.;65 of the Vail Municipal Code. Applicant: Lodge
Properties, Inc.
5. Request for exterior alteration and nodification in Connercial Core I. zone
district in accordance with Section 18.24.065 of the Vail Municipal Code to
allow the Red Lion Inn to enclpse with glass the northern portion of their
fiont.deck on the west side of the bui.lding. Applicant: Jeff Selby.
The applications and information relating to the proposed changes are availablc
in the Zoning Administratorts office during regular business hours for rcview
or inspection bY thc Public.
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPAR'ITIINT OF COI{TIIJNIfi DEVELOPMENT
A. Pcter Pattcn' .tr.
Zoning Administrator
2.
3.
Publlshed in thc Vail Trail January 22, 1982.
Ruof tAllentworth
AfChitgCtS,:: :;";:,* r'r, fi lfi
TRANSMITTAL RECORD
TO Town of Vail
Dept. of Community Development JOB NO. #8102 B
DATE
75 S. Frontage Road JOB TITLE Harry's Bar
Vail, Colorado 8'l 657 Lodge at Vail
We Are Sending:
For Your:
The Following:
Herewith (1 ) Under
Information ( X Use
Prints (t' Letters (
Shop Drawings ( )
Requisitions . ( )
coPrES DESCRIPTION REMARKS
Design Review Board Submittal for Harryrs Bar and
East Lobby Entry to be reviewed on APril T. 1982
Allen Taforra
Separate Cover ( )
() Action()
) Specs() Cuts()
Photographs ( ) Photostats ( )
RUOFF/WENTWORTH
Copies of Above ( )
Transmittal Only ( )
ARCHITECTS AIA P.C.
To:
o\o
MElvORAI{DUM
TO: Planning and Environnental Corrunission
FROM: Department of Corwn:nity Development
DATE: March 2, 1982
RE: Public hearing and consideration of an exterior alteration and addition
of a restau""it ,pu"" called Harryrs Bar,' On the eastern side of the
ioage at Vai-f. Applicant: Lodge Propercties' Inc'
A. .COMPLIANCE WIrH THE PURqOqE_!E TION OF rH! COIO€RCIAL C IE I ZoNE DISTRICT
BACKGROI.JND:
In July of 1981 the applicant, Lodge Properties, Incorporated, came to the town with
a proposal to add 026"rq"""" i'eet io^the'Salt Lick Dining Roon; the addition is to
benamedHarry|sBar.onJulyt.S,lgSlthePlanningCorunission,expressjJrgissues
concerning the reduction of open space and pedestriinizati'on, disapproved the
"Jaitl"t in a tie (2-2) vote'- on iuty 22, lgsL the Town council overturned the
Planning Conrnissionts decision by a vote of 7-0'
At the present tine the applicant is returning to the Planning corunission with
"1"r0-"!q""rt. The applicant proPoses increasing the restaurant add-ition ' .. .-!:.-'.
frorn 620 to 1,800 ,q'"t" feet and adding a neeting roollr 6€ 884 sqrrare feet in the
basenent of the renoiel . The new acldition will extend 54 feet to the east' to
within five feet of the property line.
18. 24 . 010 PurPose
The cornmercial core I district is intended to provide sites and to maintain the
*iq"" character of the Vail Village connercial- area, with its nixture of lodges
and conmercial establishments in a predorninately pedestrian environnent' The
conmercial core I district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open sPace,
and other amenities appropriate to the Pernitted trpes 9f buildings and uses..
The district regulati-oi1, in u."o"dance with the Vail Village urban design guide
plan and design considerations prescribe site development standards that are in-
iended to ensure the rnaintenancl and preservation of the tightly clustered arangments
of buiLdings fronting on pedestrianw"ys and public greenways, and to ensure con-
tinuation oe tne Uuiiding- scale and alchitectural qualities that distingursn
the village
This department reconnends approval of the project with
itl" "ppi:."tnt pay for the inprovements in the entrance
Drive and the entrance to thc addition from the Villagc
the condition that
to the bar fton Gore Creek
P Iaza.
lJ'lamy's Bar -2- 3/2/82v
B. COMPLIANCE WITH TIIE VAIL VILLAGE UITBA,N DESIGN CUIDE PLAN
1. St:b-area conseet_s of tlre_Urb.an Desj.gll G.uide P1an.
Although the Village Plaza is mentioned in the Guide Plan, no specific guidelinesare given for this space.
The applicant has indicated that. the secondary entry to Hariyrs Bar will be from. Gore Creek Drive, between the Lazier Arcade and the Lodge. ihe sub-areaconcepts call for a "pocket park" wilh benches, planters and snow storage.The objectives of the guide plan are partially fulfilled by upgradingthis area by adding landscaping and benches,
fe{.r,t.t!.rtq+li-""
The current proposal r,rill alter pedestrian access to the Lodge. Access
between the Lodge and the Lazret Arcade Bui.lding on Gore creek Drive willbe-encouraged. ihe rnain entrance to the bar will be frorn the plaza.
Vehic.lb Penetretion
No change.
4. Streetsc.?pe. Fr.elrework
Although the proposed addition has no direct frontage on a public street,the proposed facades will eventually be an important part oi a very publicarea in Vail, the Village Plaza, This addition should be carefully integratedinto the Plaza and nust be able to stand alone without relying on any fuiureinprovements--which may or rnay not cone about.
5. Street Ehclosure no change
6. 9tJegt*lggu. no change
g"jsll
The building height of li'3" is well within the height linitations of boththe Guide Plan and the zoning code.
Views
t'.,
2.
3,
1
8.
There are no designated viewaddition. One proposed viewthe al ley between the arcade
corridors that would be irrfluenced by the restaurantcorridor, originating fron Core Cr.eek Drive throughand thc Lodge to the ski mountain is affectcd.
II 't oHarry
The eastern edge of Harryrs Bar will be within five feet of the greenhouseof the Hong Kong Cafe. Harryts Bar will cast a shadow over thb bar area' of the cafe.
C. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
PaTk ing
Tha appltcent will be required to pay a parking fee before the issuance ofa buildlng P€rnit. The fee will be calculated using the seating capaCityof the neu rostaurant and the square footage of the neetiJlg roon.
RECOMMENDATION
The Departrnent reconmends approval of the project with three conditions:
1. The applicant should pay for all irnprovements to both entrances to the bar,including the entrance fron the Plaza as well as the nini-park off of GoreCreek Drive,
,1; 2. Ttre street lights along the entrance wa lkr+ays should be the same type as ...'\'- those purchased by the Town for VaiL Village. l.
3, Ttre applicant should agree to participate in and not retnonstrate againsa *Uaspecia1funprovenentdistrictwhenoneisfornedfortheVi11agearea.
l
ts Bar -S- 3/2/82
9. Service_agd Delivery no change
10. S/rua"
Dat e of APPlicat ron l l ,'23,81o
APPLICATION FORI,I FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
oR MODtFtcATIONS lN COMMERCIAL coRE | (CCl)
A. NAME OF APPLICANT Lodge Properties lnc.
ADDRESS 174 E. Gore Creek Drive, Vail, Cdlorado 81657 PHONE 476-501 1
NAME OF APPLICANTIS
ADDRESS 500 Lionshead
REpRESENTATIVE Ruoff/Wentworth Architects AlA, PC
Mall, Vail, Colorado 81557 pHONE 476-30s1
c.AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER !rSTCNATURE Thor G. Loberg
ADDRESS 174 E, Gore Creek Drive,Vail, Colorado 81657p961r16 476-5011
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS Lodqe at Vail 174 E. Gore Creek Drive- Vail. Colorado
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tracts A, B. C. Block 5C. Vail Village First Filing
E. FEE: Check for $102.00 enclosed.
F. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY: See attached improvement survey prepared by
Johnson Kunkel 6 Assoc. dated l2l18/80, revised 111181 I
)
G. LIST OF NAMES OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: See AttAChCd IiSt Of IO
names,
ll. SITE PLAN: See attached drawings (4 copies)
PROJECT DESCRIPTI ON,ltP O
This profect includes a -9+! sq. ft.
existing east lobby entrance.
A. Restaurant Additon I
restaurant addition and modification of the
It is proposed'to extertd the existing Salt
east property line. The concrete terrace
t
l. This procedure is required for alteration of an existing building which adds or
removes any enclosed floor area or outdoor patio or replacement of an existing
building shbll be subject to review by the Planning and Environmental Commission.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
B.
Ej, b" ,o-^-r-
Lick Dining Room 57 feet j.6 the
that is used for outdoor iummer
ilt.
I
ffi
dining wilt remain. The space currently occupied by the Salt Lick Dining
Room will be used for additional kitchen space and restrooms to serve the
new dining room located in the new space farthest to the east.
To reinforce the identity of the relocated Salt Lick Dining Room it will be
renamed Harryrs Bar and will have its own entry directly off the walkway
from the sotith.
B. East Lobby Entry Modification:
The east lobby entry will be modified to include a revolving door located
few feet north of the existing door plus a conventional door for guests
entering the Lodge with skis. The objective of this modification is to
enhance the visibility of the east hotel entry from the Village Plaza.
IV. URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:
Pedestrianization:
The walkway from Qore Creek Drive to the Lodge at Vail east courtyardwill be eliminated. Pedestrian traffic flow will be redirected throuohthe Village Plaza from the southeast.
B. Vehicle Penetration:
The restaurant addition and the lobby entry modifications are completely
removed from and have no impact upon vehicle traffic.
Streetscape Framework :
Although the restaurant addition and lobby entry modification are not adjacent
to any public way and are totally on private proPerty, the walking experience
from the Village Plaza into the east lobby entry will be improved by a better
definition between restaurant and hotel lobby.
Street Enclosure:
Street enclosure considerations do not apply here because the proposed
addition and modification do not occurr on any street. However, the extension
of the south wall of the present building will help define the court yard and
create an improved sense of place.
Street Edge:
Although street edge considerations do not apply, visual interest along the
walkway from the Village Plaza will be improved by the addition of colored
awnings over intricately detailed windows along the south wall of the addition.
Night views into the lighted dining room will also provide added visual interest.
c.
D.
E.
7
'l o
F. Building Height:
The restaurant addition ls Jft{o|,riStr. This matches the existing building
d-t
V. ZONING: See attached zoning check.
Service and Delivery:
There will be no change in service and delivery patterns at the Lodge.
l. Sun and Shade:
The addition will cast late afternoon shadows on the Hong Kong Cafe
bar addition to the Lazier Arcade Building.
oo
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO THE LODGE AT VAIL
The United States Forest Service
P.O. Box 190
Minturn, Colorado 816115
Riva Ridge South Ownerls Association
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Riva Ridge North Ownerrs Association
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Sitzmark Lodge
Robert Fritch
183 E. Gore @eek Dive
Vail, Colorado 81657
- Gore Creek Plaza Building
Jack Fritzlen
193 E. Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Bell Towei Building
Clark Willingham
1300 Bryan Towers
Dallas, Texas 75201
Lazier Arcade
Bob LazierP.O. Box 1325
Vail, Coloradi 81658
One Vail Place
Vail Associates
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
Lodge Apartment Ownerrs Association
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81557
Lodge South
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
tt
ZONING CHECK
The Lodge at Vail
#8102 B
Parts of Tracts A, B, E C, Block 5C,
Zone: Commercial Core 1
Proposed 1,270 square feet of additional
Vail Village First Filing
dining at Salt Lick Restaurant.
Demensions Existing lot area 132,523 sq. ft'
None Required
Existing: 55r at main wing
of The Lodge, 99r at the Lodge
South.
Proposed: 161 8rr to match
adiE6t-ouilding wing.
80E of Lot Area
808 (132,523) = 106,018 allowed
GRFA
Existing : 151,632 sq. ft. ERFA
in The Lodge at Vail and The
Lodge South.
246,340 total square footage
including garages and
conditional and Permitted
uses.
ProPosed: 1,270 sq. ft. addition
to restaurant.
Existing Uses N /A
80E (132,523) = 106,018 sq. ft.
allowed coverage.
Existing Coverage: 49,958 sg.-f!,
Proposed Coverage: 50,846 sq. ft
inaieE o-Tffd-q. ft.
Sidewalk in courtYard will
be extended to serve entry to
restaurant addition.
Unchanged
OIA -
18. 24. 090
18. 24. 100
18. 24. 120
18. 24. I 30
18. 24. 140
18.24.150
Lot Area 6 Site
Setbacks
Height
Density Control
Reconstruction of
Coverage
Landscape E Site Development
Parking 6 Loading
r8.24.170
I 8. 24. 180
{4',t Project Application
oate March 19, 1982
Proiect Name: Hrrryr< Rer Restaurant Fypansion* The Lodge at Vail
1800 sq. ft. restaurant addition to the existing Salt Lick Dinlng Room
Project Descripli6n; and mndificaiinn tn thc Faqt I obhy Fntry.
Contact Person and phsns R uoff /Wan tuynrth Arr'hiioct AlA, P-C - 476-30i1
/'.ll:n Taft.y;;
Owner, Address and Phone: I orllt t.. Properties Inc t,76-5011
lzA tr Corr. t- rpol< irrivo, V;:il. C() lll657
Architect, Address and Phone: FUnff /liientn'^rtl-r \rr hit"-'rt'.i A I q., i)-i- r:.7ti-litil
500 Lionshead iriall, Vail , i ', ut6l7Parts of
Legal Description' lsf A, R, C , Block q-C , Fiting Vail Village First , Zone _Q1]1_
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
DISAPPROVAL
o
Summary:
Harryrs Bar - The Lodge at Vail
Exterior PlasterPratt 6 Lambert
Ulhite Y l58lij
Trim
Moorwood S*T
Brown 5T-68
Exterior Siding
Olympic Solid Bodyrrl{oodland Green"
N ame of P roject :
Legal Description:
Description of Proj
Har Bar Restauranttso
Lot A, B, C Block Filing Vail Village First
sion. T
s-c
ect: Harryrs Bar expansion of existing Salt Lick Din Room,
The Lodge at Vail
The following information is required
Board before a final approval can be
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Roof
Siding
Other Wall lVlaterials
Fa sc ia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
G reenhouses
Phone:
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES
SHRUBS
for submittal by the applicant to the Design Review
given:
Type of Material
Wood Shingles T.M"E. and
BuiJt up with Baliast Natural Sand
lndividual Cedar Board Olympic Solid Body
Color
Verticle Sidinq nWogdl-anj GreentlPratt E Lambert
Portland Cement Plaster White Y358W
Moorwood Semi-Trans-
Wood
T6G Pine
Pella Clad
Moorwood Semi-Trans*
Rouqh Sawn Cedar parent Brown 5T-.68
Walnut Clear Sealer
Moorwood Semi*Trans-Wood parent Brown 5T-68
Metal Exterior Wall Color
Metal It
N/A
Moorwood Semi-.T rans=.
Rouqh Sawn Cedar Brown 5T-68
Green to Match ExistingCanvas Awning at Arlberg Terrace
Other Knee B races
Awning at East Lobby Entry
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer: Gary Powell of : Carl A" Worthinqton Partnership
443-7271 1309 Spruce Streel Boulder, CO 80302
Botanical Name Common Name Quantity Size
Please refer to submftlgg_lgllleape plan for landscape infsrmetion.
arent Brown 5T-68
Moorwood Penetrating
Clear
White to Match
Portland Cement Plaster
Portland Cement Plaster
on Concrete Block
Pratt
White
Pratt
lilfhite
E Lambert
Y3s8W
E Lambert
Y358W
-
,L.=FOOTAGE
soD
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE
SQUARE FOOTAGE
SQUARE FOOTACE
TYPE OR METHOD
OF EROSION
CONTROL
C. Other Landscape Features (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.)
Please specify.
Retaining walls on north side of building will be Portland cement plaster on
concrete block painted to match existing building addition. Fence along
service area on the west side of the Arcade building will be the same
construction as the retaining walls.
-,ri ,r-
!,
PI,A,\NING AND I]NVII{ONMTNTAL COIMISSION
December.
PRNSENT
Scott [dwardsWill Trout
Gerry Mri.te
Dan Corcoran
Duane Piper
.Iim Morgan
ABSENT
F6gEFTitkeneier
The meeting was cal 1cd to order at 3:00following a work session on CC4 zoning
Sl)\F F
DicK Ryan
Peter Patten
Petcr Janar
J.in Sayre
Bet-sy Rosolack
p.m. by chairnian, Gerry ltthite,
and rev.i-sed .Red Li,on p1ans.
Iqrl
Will moved
unaninclus.
1. Arrproval. of tlie nrinutes of the {gy-_en!-9.f_?q,_1981 Tcetj!-g.and Duen c scconded to approvc the ninutes. The vote was S-Cl,
2. Request for a njljr_jq!4iv-r:1gl!- _g_f_lots 10Patch. Applicant: CUS tinicrp-ises
.ll and 12 Block I Pota toPatch. Applicant: CUS Entcrprises, lnc.
Pcter Patten shor,red site plans showing new lj.nes with the old property line.sin red. Ile explained why the staff rcrcornnrended approva.l and Ken l{ilson representingthe property owners expl.ained that a drivertay cncroachrnent on lot 11 was tobe i:liminated with the resubdivi-sioir ,
Dan explained that no a.llowable GRFA changes wouid occur. Duane voiced concern aboutlot lines rcgarding the distance between the buil.dings. Peter assuaged thcirconcerns. .Scott rnoved and Wil l seconcir,d to approveci the l'equest for a minorsnbdivision. The vote wets 5-0 in favor with Dan abstaining.
1. Beg"e-lt- Jqr"-g r9.?9r,1!&_e!_t_o!:-_l- !l'r9gg!_1,.-.c1iffsjde:!,'u4iy!:igrr-.]irsgResi.dential cluster Djstrict to single Famili nist.ict.. rippticants: luchardBlown, I)aryl ll. Burns, David L. Colc, and Charles H. Rosenquist.
Pctcr Patten explained che meino shorving the sitc plan and di"scussed the graphsin the memo. Phil Ordway cxplained thlrt- he and Dave Snren+-ana each had a contractto bt"ty a I ot if the zoning was changecl , and that they wcr'r.) j,nstrunental inlqrqtresting thc lezcnitrg, J jrn rccal led tha.t whcn this subdivision was annexed
and zoned ltesidential Clustcr it was the intentj.on to lccon:;i.der the zoningat a later date. lle was j.n fe,r'or of 1-hc changc. Drur stirtecl that ho fcl. tthat lot 6 should be includctl. ori,lwrry e.rpiainccl that Roscnquist. (owner oflot 6) was in favor of (:hrrlging hi"s lot to duplcx (p.rescntl.y hc corrld builclIt possibl e 3) or P/S. 0rdway statcrl tlrat hc <lidn tt havc t i.rne to stutly thealt.ernativos .in fu1 1 ond so dccidcr<l llot to inc.lrrde 1ot 6.at tJre last nrjurrtr,,r.rtlding th:Roscnqui.st told hinr tllat llc (Ro.st nqrrist) woulri rroi j.n-sisl cln builtling ; urriii. -
0rdway l'/cnt oll to stiltc tlrlt ht-' di<j lot'fccl. tlurt this r,,;r:; silot zonirlg for' .lot (r:-ince it ivus adjaccnt to llc zr.rning.
lo. -r- tz!/a/st
Scott agrced with Ordrvay adding that lot 6 was so different,, there was no
need to consider it with the other lots. Scott addcd that he was concerncdthat the houses not bc built high on thc ricige and wondcrcd if a tradc-offcottld be made in this re-spcct. Ordway assurcd Scott that thc houses would
be down thc hill far enough so that they wouldn't interfcre with others,views.Ordlay added that siting was the main r'cason for tns request. Jim voiccd -- -'
concern ovel' the visual impact, also, then said he was sur:e DRB would takethat into considerat ion.
Will noved and Duane seconded to rezone lots 1 thru 5 to Single Family. Thevote was 6-0, unanimous.
Dan voiced his concern that thebuild, because the owners of the
high point. Gerry felt this was
owners would be coming in with a
RC zone in thj-s developnent made
hone owners show concern as to how high they
Ridge rvere purposely not building on the
the correct zoning because otherwise the
series of requests for variances since theit virtually unbuildable.
Prelininary Review Session for Exterior Alterations and Irlodifications.
This session was to decide whether or not the submitted projBcts wouldbe considered najor--requiring a 90 day study, or minor--requiring a 60 day
study.
AlI of the following were considered to be najor revisions:
Gallery BuildingSlifer Building
Lodge at Vail - llarlyts Bar (new location)
Red l,ion Inn -Deck Enclosure
The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
TO
la , , ^.Cr r?f-. r...]-i !. rF,, . . ,,LS,IJCfi 'VYet tLviu, Lr i.
JOB NO. #8102 B
JOB TITL1 Lodge at Vail - Harry's Bar
Herewith (j Under Seporote Cover ( )
lnformolion ( ) Use ( ) Action ( )
Prints(1) Letters () Specs() Cuts()
ShopDrowings () Photogrophs ( ) Photostots (
Requisitions ( )
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
Archite cts ;: .*{iil; AtA
RECORD
DATE November 23, 1981
T RANSMITTAL
Town of Vail - Cemmunity Dev.
75 S, Frontage Road
Vail Colorado 81657
We Are Sending:
For Your:
The Following:
COPIES
Application
Property Owners
4 copies of Site Plan
Building Floor Plan and Sections
North E South Building Elevations
Existing Floor Plan
Roger Landing
RUOFF/ WENTWORTH ARCHITECIS, AIA
CoPies of Above ( )
Tronsmittol OnlY( ) To:
o Date of A PP lrcat ion I r /2f181
APPLTCATION FORN'I FOR EXTERIOR ALTERAT]ONS
oR MODIFICATIONS lN COMMERCIAL CORE I (CCl)
t. This procedure is required for alteration of an existing building which adds or
removes any enclosed-floor area or outdoor patio or replacement of an existing
building sh'alt be subject to review by the Planning and Environmental Commission.
The apptication witl not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT Lodge Properties lnc.
ADDRESS 174 E. Gore Creek Drive, Vail, Colorado 81657 pHONE 476-s011
B.NAME OF
ADDRESS
APPLTCANT'S
.500 Lionshead
REpRESENTATIVE Ruoff/Wentworth Architects AlA, PC
D.
Mall, Vail, Colorado 81657 pHONE 476-3051
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS Lodqe at Vail 174 E. Gore Creek Drive. Vail. Colorado
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tracts A. B. C. Block 5C. Vail Village First Filing
FEE: Check for $102.00 enclosed.
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY: See attached improvement survey prepared by
Johnson Kunkel 6 Assoc. dated l2l18/80, revised 111181 I
G. LIST OF NAMES OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: See attached IiSt Of IO
names.
ll. SITE PLAN: See attached drawings (4 copies)
IIt. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project includes a 7,27A sq. ft. restaurant addition and modification of the
existing east lobby entrance.
A. Restaurant Additon:
It is proposed'to exterld the existing Salt Lick Dining Room 57 feet to the
east property line. The concrete terrace that is used for outdoor summer
C. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNEB ^li
srcNAruRE
';^:: ;'.";;:;;'% I /^"4, '
ADDRESS 174 E. Gore Creek Drive, Vail, Colorado 81657p661,19 476-5011
,,,
dining will remain. The space currently occupied by the Salt Lick Dining
Room will be used for additional kitchen space and restrooms to serve the
new dining room located in the new sPace farthest to the east'
identity of the relocated Salt Lick Dining E9"T it wjll be
Bar anb will have its own entry directl!'off the walkwayTo reinforce the
renamed HarrYrs
from the south.
B. East Lobby EntrY Modification:
The east lobby entry will be modified to include a revolving door located
few feet north of thL existing door plus a conventional door for guests
entering the Lodge with skis. The objective of this modification is to
enhancJ the visiSility of the east hotel entry from the Village Plaza-
IV. URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATTONS:
A . Pedest r ia n i zat ion :
. The walkway from Gore Creek Drive to the Lodge at Vail east courtyard
will be eliminated. Pedestrian traffic flow will be redirected through
the Village Plaza from the southeast.
B. Vehicle Penetration:
The restaurant addition and the lobby entry modifications are completely
removed from and have no impact upon vehicle traffic'
c.Streetscape Framework :
Although the restaurant addition and lobby entry modific.ation are not adjacent
to. any public way and are totally on private property, the walking experience
from ihe Village Ftaza into the eist lobby entry will be improved by a better
definition between restaurant and hotel lobby.
Street Enclosure:
street enclosure considerations do not apply here because the proposed
"aOition and modification do not occurr on any street. However, the extension
of the south wall of the present building will help define the couqt yard and
create an imProved sense of Place.
Street Edge:
Although street edge considerations do not apply, visual interest along the
walkwa-y from the Vitlage Plaza will be improved by the addition of colored
awning! over intricately aetailed windows along the south wall of the addition'
Night-,ri"*" into the liltrteO dining room will also provide added visual interest'
D.
E.
F. Building Height:
The restaurant addition is 16t 8" high. This matches the existing building
G. Views:
There are rxr designated view corridors in the area.
H. Service and Delivery:
There wilt be no change in service and detivery patterns at the Lodge,
l. Sun and Shade:
The addition will cast late afternoon shadows on the Hong Kong Cafe
bar addition to the Lazier Arcade Building.
V. ZONING: See attached zoning check.
ooADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO THE LODGE AT VAIL
The United States Forest Service
P.O. Box 190
Minturn, Colorado 81545
Riva Ridge South Ownerrs Association
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Riva Ridge North Ownerrs Association
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Sitzmark Lodge
Robert Fritch
183 E. Gore Creek Diveil, Colorado 81657
: Gore Creek Plaza BuitdingI Jack Fritzlen
193 E. Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Bell Tower Building
Clark Willingham
1300 Bryan Towers
Dallas, Texas 75201
Lazler Arcade
Bob Lazier
P.O. Box 1325
Vail, Coloradi 81658
One Vail Place
Vail Associates
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
Lodge Apartment Ownerrs Association
'l 74 Gore Creek Drlve
Vail, Colorado 81657
Lodge South
lTtl Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
t.
ZONING CHECK
The Lodge at Vail
#8102 B
Parts of Tracts A, B, 6 C, Block 5C,
Zone: Commercial Core I
Proposed 1,270 square feet of additional
t 8. ztt. 090 Lot Area 6 Site
Vail Village First Fiting
dining at Salt Lick Restaurant.
Demensions Existing lot area 132,523 sq. ft.
None Required
Existing: 55r at main wing
of The Lodge, 99r at the Lodge
South.
Proposed: 16r Srrto match
adjacent building wing.
80? of Lot Area
80% (132,523) = 106,018 allowed
GRFA
Existing : 151,632 sq. ft. GRFA
in The Lodge at Vail and The
Lodge South.
246,340 total square footage
including garages and
conditional and Permitted
uses.Proposed: 1,270 sq. ft. additionto restaurant.
Existing Uses N /A
80? (132,523t = 106,018 sq. ft.
allowed coverage.
Existing Coverage: 49,958 sq. ft.
Proposed Coverage: 50,845 sq. ft.
Increase o-tl0 sq. ft.
Sidewalk in courtYard will
be extended to serve entry to
restaurant addition.
Unchanged
r 8.24. r 00
18. 24. 120
18. 24. t 30
18.24.r40
18.24.150
18.24.170
18. 24. r 80
Setbacks
Height
Density Control
Reconstruction of
Coverage
Landscape s Site Development
Parking 6 Loading
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
August 25, 1981
Tor Loberg, Manager
The Lodge at Vai'l
174 E. Gore Creek Dr.
Vail, Colorado 81657
PJ:df
department of community development
RE: DRB Submitta'l of 8-19-81
Dear Tor:
At the August 19 meeting of the Design Review Board,-your submittal
for an addition to the iestaurant at the Lodge at Vail was given
final approva'l with the fol'lowing stipulations: modification that
stone fiting be used along low p1 anter wall and lower walI be1 ow
emergency eiit -- also signage and awning lettering be submitted
at a later date.
Jamar
Project Appllcatlon
on" a/tfot
Project Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description:t-ot Arh{r.,g1ssy 5C) ,riting VArLVtu+4e- Ff ,zone-Q}l.
Comments:
Design Review Board
OISAPPROVAL
.J(fu"l/TAffi.
E Statt Approval
O O'rllit.\;itrii:r",t irr;iltt.O,,,, | ?
The Lodge at Vail - Restaurant AdditionA piif-ofTot5
LOI A, B,C llt.t,..t: 5C lr ll.lli(;Vail Village First Filing
l)rcl i nr. Final
Auror.q Alrrgrgl Conr: nts
Bl dg location on sitc
Bldg Configuration
Appropriateness with
Neighborhood
He ight
Mass
Roof Forns
Use of l"lateri.al s
Choice of Color
Energy Efficiency
B. Site Consideration
Disturbance of
Natural Features
Snow Removal
Access onto Site
Vehicular and Pedes-
trian circulation
Landscaping Plan
Grading S Drainage
Erosion Control
Irrigation System
Exterior Lighting
Retaining ltralls
Accessory Structures
C. ltliscellaneous Considerations
D.Other. Conment s
'Q I
.1n ,l1 '.,i7" r,'Jt-l''Y' l
A. Col4plrANCE t{ITH pURPOSE SI:CTI0N
18.24.010 Purpose
The Commercial Core I District is intended to provide sites and to maintain theuni.que character of the,Vai'l village Commerciai Area, *itn-iti miiture oi iojsjesand commercial establishments in a-predominantly p.O6si"iin environment. TheCommercia'l Core I District is intenied to ensuri bdequate light, air, open spaceand other amenities appropriate to the permii[eo atpd;-;i uriijindi jnj'rr.i'.--'
If_Di:i"i!t-resulatiohs in accordance with the vait-viitate uruan oes.ign duiaePlan and Design Considerations prescribe site development itandards thal are \intended to ensure the maintenahce and preservation bt ttre tignity ciusieiea Iarrangements of.bujldings-fronting on pedestrian ways and pubTic lreenways ind to Iensure continuation of bui'lding siale ind architectira'i quitities"ttrit aistinsuiit, \the Village. ---,
The Community Development Department considers thatLodge at VaiI do conform with the Commercial Core IUrban Des'ign Guide plan.
the proposed changes to theDistrict, and the Vai'l Vil'lage
B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE VAIL VILLAGT URBAN DESION !!IDE PLAN AND DTSIGN
l. Sub-area concepts of Urban
No sub-area concept of the
2. Pedestrianization
Design Guide Pl an
Plan is related to this proposa'|.
The restaurant expansion or coverjn$*Ae:fsbJ!#;l- not have any effecton pedestrianization.
Lo<lgc Additions -2- 7/6/8L
a.
t'' \
3. Veh j.cle Penetra.tion r No ch:rnge
4, St::ect !ggg_ l'UrytqlL' No change
5. Street Enclosure: No change
9. St.re.et Edge: No change
7. Building Ileight:
ef,tlsurg . Ls
One comment that cane out of the preiininary review of the
and Environmental Comrnission neeting of June 8, 1981 was theheight. The Design Review Board will review in detail this concernproposal is presented to thern to see if this should be at a reduced
Height of the restaurant addition is 13 feet.
There is no designated view corridor that would be affected by either
proposal .
9.Service and Deliverv:No change.
10. Sun Shade: Not affected by the proposal.
. TONING CONS.I.DERATIONS
Parking: The applicant will be required to pay the applicable parking feefor the restaurant.
DESIGN CONSIDEMTIONS
The Design Review Board will
and for the enclosed pool .
ENERGY CONSERVATION
review the architectural plans for the restaurant
part of the design of the enclosed
2. That the applicanr agree
improvenent district when
t-theh*@n the
in and not remonstrate against a specialfor the Vail Village area.
r_n the design of the enclosed pool area, energy conservation neasuresshould be introduced.
RECOTII'IENDATION:
The c-orrunun ity Development Departnent reconmends approval of the requestfor the restaurant eipansion- and covering the swirmning pool. rhe Departnentconsiders the request in confornance qith the vail vli,liee urban Desien Guidevlan and Design Considerations. &t^J A+:>>"'.'-.",t.-'ca! fuu f '>6>", d.;#.t,
1.
to participate
one is forrned//.
I orv side
Planniri
3l foot
when the
height,
Views i
PI,AT.IN ING AI.ID ENVIRONI"IINTAL COMMI SS1ON
July 13, l98l 3:00 p.n.
PRESENT
Scott Edwards
Duane Piper
Dan Corcoran
Gerry White
Jim Morgan
ABSENT
STAFF
Peter Patten
Dick Ryan
Larry Eskwith
Betsy Rosolack
COUNC IL REPRESENTAT IVE
Roger Tilkeneier
Gaynor Miller
The ureeting was called to order by Gerry White, chairman.
l. Approval of the ninutes of June 22, L98L.
Tom Steinberg
2. A request for a setback variance to nake legal an exist.ing building which
of an unplatted parcel in Bighorn titled Sundial Phase II. Applicant:
Penner Constructio; l.ia;'^;;;;:;:i, Inc.
Peter Patten presented the nemo, explaining the error nrade from the destruction
and subsequent re-location of a concrete monurnent. Jeff Spanel explained
how the survey error cane about, and Dan Corcoran added explanations regarding
subsequent surveys showing other property corners in the subdivision andagreeing that an honest error had been made. Tim Garton representing VailEast Townhones told of his concern of the dyking of the property and feltthat it nould affect their side of the creek. Peter stated that he would
discuss this with Tin.
Dan noved and Duane ieconded to approve the request for the setback variance.the vote was 5-0 in favor, unanirnous.
5. lPPeaI 9f a.dninistT+tive decision concerning the color of a residence on Lot 20
Potato Patch. Applicants: Jonine and J. J. Collins.
Larry Eskwith explained that the Collins had had some problems with their color
and were told by'Peter Patten that their only option was to cone before the
DRB to appeal for the change in color, or to change to the color that was listedin their original presentation. The Collins' did appeal, and were denied. .
llouever, he (Larry) was of the opinion that the PEC did not have the powerto hear this item.
Scott Edwards moved and Jin ltorgan scconded that the PEC did not have theauthority to hear the Collins appcal'
The vote was 5-0, unanirnous to accePt thc fact that they couid not hear the
appeal .
PEc -2- 7/rs/8r a
4. Requcst for dcnsity varjancc for lot 12, Bljrck A7,_Clrsolar II
at ll-01 Vail View Drive. Applicants: Jean and Janes ltl, MclJonald, Jean Catoe,
et al .
Dick Ryan stated that the staff would like to table this itcm until the next
PEC rneeting, because that norning the staff had received a large memo fron the
applicant, and wanted time to study it. George Straw, attorney for the applicant,
stated that. this was the first tine that lr{r. McDonald had had a chance to present
his case. Discussion followed, and it was decided t,hat the applicant could
mke his presentation, and the request could still be postponed afterward.
Peter Patten then reviewed briefly the previ.ous neetings and appeals with Deane
Knox, and added that the staff still recorunended denial for lot, 12,
GeorgeStrawthen gave his presentation for the applicant: He felt that the
Town had acted illegally, and mentioned the fact that Phase I was zoned RC
and then LDMF. (Dan pointed out that this was because it was originally Soingto be part of Homestake.) He added that Deane Knox had talked to Diana Toughhill
in planning the subdivision. He pointed out that the plat did not show even
cornmon open space, and yet was approved. He felt that the slope analysis should
have been done first on each lot. His exhibit. G was a letter to Deane from
Diana Toughill stating that. the units could be townhouses, and Straw added that
Toughill indicated that GRFA was on a per unit basis.
Dan Corcoran pointed out that the plat refers to protective covenants and are
part of the plat and call out the restric.tions.
$+1sv1 fhsn di"^ussed the fact that the resoluti-ons state 1400 GRFA, and yet
3380 GRFA was in the declarations. Deane was advised that there would be an
evaluation later.
Peter Patten read tninutes showing that the PEC approved resubdivision request'
NOt GRFA.
Straw then stated that Carling proposed a greater GRFA and received it and thenstill built a larger unit. He questioned why the conrnission assuned Knox was
the spokesman for the subdivision. Gerry ltlhite responded that Knox had been
the spokesman who responded to their inquiries. Jiur l"lcDonald stated that Knox
further understood that he could transfer density fron Phase I to Phase Il.
Straw questioned whether or not McDonald inflicted the hardbhip on hinself,
uhether or not the Tohm violated its own zoning ordinance, and whether or not
the Torin had ignored the true owners of the lots.
Dan felt he wanted to know how nany building permits were issued Prior to
the problen, and were the owners nade aware of the problern. Scott, ndntj.oned
that the Town cannot enforce the covenants which state the GRFA. He also asked
that the information in the new neno be boiled down to fewer pages. Larry E.
said the events nust be reconstructed. Dan asked that the staff keep in contact
uith Straw and McDonald so that both sides would know what would be said at
the next neeting.
Dan noved and Duan e seconded a nrotion to table the item until the next meeting.
The vote was 5-0.to table.
5.
PEC -3- 7/L3/8L o
A request for anonttunent in accordance witll_9-ggegns__ljjqq._Ll0 throug\_r8.66_._l-qqto thc zoning ordinancc from Rcsidcntial (ll Lrstcr to l{csidcntial Pr.irna ry/ Sccondaryin order to build a residcntial unit togcther with a caretakerrs unit.Applicant: Doyle Hopkins.
After beginning discussion, it was discovered that there were sone adjacent
Property owners on the Ridge rvho werenrt notified of the neeting. Ed Drager
asked to table the iten until the next necting. Duane rnoved and Jim secondedto table this until the next regular rneeting. Vote was 4-D (Dan had left.)
A ninor subdivision request to vacate a lot line between 1o!: i:l_gn!_4:?,
Peter Patten explained the memo, and Dave Green representing Architerra saidthat this was really overlooked at the previous meeting when the project had
been approved. Gerry Whit.e stated that, while he was opposed to the projectitself, this point was a minor one.
Drane moved and Jim seconded to grant the request to vacate the lot line.
ltre vote was 4-0.in favor.
7. A qeque_st for an exterior alteration and modifi_cation in Connercial Core II,
under Section 18.26.045 on Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Lionshead lst Filing, to add
51950 square feet of office space to the Lionshead Gondola Building, and a requestfor a variance to Section I8.26.150 to waive the requirernent of including onehalf the parking within the main building. Applicant: Vail Associates.
Peter Patten explained the request, including an explanation of the nurnber of
ParKing unlts tnat Vail Associates have for their employees, which the stafffelt was adequate. Ton Leonard of itail Associates explained that they did not
have sufficient office space for their employees, Dr. Steinberg of the Town
Council wanted to be assured that the parking lois were zoned for parking only.,
and Dick Ryan assured hin that they were. Scott was concerned that in futureyears, it miSht not be rernembered that this variance was granted on the basisof the existing spaces. Tom Leonard reminded them that VA had 140 extra parking
sPaces.Discussion of the one condition, that the applicant agrees to parti-cipate in and not renonstrate against a special inprovement district when oneis formed for the Lionshead area, followed.
Jin noved and. Duane seconded to approve the request as stated in the staff merno
_of July 6, 1981 including the condition described above. The vote was 3-1 ,scott opposed because he wasnrt confortable with the parki.ng situation.
8. ... Public healing and consideration of an exterior alteration and modification
reque st Conmercial Core I for the addition o
6.
able glass
Applicant:
enclosure over the existing swimrning
Lodge Properties, Inc.
restaurant space and a retract-
pool at the Lodge at Vail .
decided to ask only for the restaurant
applicant showed plans and stated
2 to 4 more parking spaces. Heis happening around this edge of
would be increased. Duane agreed
instead of quantity. Gerry White
Dick Ryan explained that the applicant hadaddition. Ken Wentworth, architect for thethat the restaurant addition would rcquire
enphasized that his firm felt that nothingthe open area and that pedestrian activity
and added that his concern was wit,h quality
w"
PEc -4- 7/rs/8r o
felt that therc_was already one najor entrance to thc Lodgc with a najorwalkway from Wall St,reet. Ken stated that he felt thcy were enhancing whatwas already there. Gerry felt that while it seems likl a srnall encro:rchnentit was not, and that the space was valuable.
Duane noved and Jim seconded to approve the modification of the restaurantsubject to condition ll2 of the staif memo, that the applicant agree to parti-cipate in and not renonstrate against a special improvenent district whenone is forned for the Vail Village area.
The vote was 2 for {Duane and Jim) and 2 against (Gerry and scott). scottwas a.gai-nst encroaching upon- open space. Gerry r-eminded the appiicant -
that he had l0 days toappeal to fown Council.
9. A request for aoploval to. replat Highrand Meadows, rots 26-42, the HighlandTarFEpeciaiG;"ion
new road dedications and vacations and rot rine removals. This is a majorsubdivision requested_under chaptet 17.04 of the vail Municipal code.Applicant: Sun Tech Builders, inc.
Peter-Patten explained that -this replat was a nere technicality after approvalof sDD l1' (The applicant did not ippear.; o"ve-anJ r'irs. Eaeen appearedto voice their concern about a drainage problen they were having, with waterrrmning off of Highland park onto their iard. They stated that-ihey hadbeen washed out several times in the past weeks. bi"k Ry.n stated thatthe new plat would take care of drainige with the redesign of the road.scott suggested they use a nethod to divert the water temporarily as wasdenonstrated by Architerra. Larry Eskwith stat;j t.L;: L-;:. Ls,,r11ora.r,2 arrdpermanent diversion of water would be a reasonable condition of- apprtvat.
scott noved and Duane seconded that the reprat be approved on conditionthat temporary relief of the drainage problenr that exists for the Edeensbe solved' water nust be diverted io itt" drainage ,yit", shown on the platwithin 15 days of final approval of the plat.
The vote was 4-0, unaninous approval with the cond.ition stated.
10.@ion 18.14.090 of the vail Mwricipal Codeto allow applicant to jlcl ood plain area in c ting allowable:;;'#;"1;;;_normta in swin and rennis club, an unplatted parcel in vail rntermountainsubdivision. ,Applicants: Internouniain swirn and Tennis cluo who wish toconstruct 2 additional units over the previous "pprouoi uy eagte Gounty.
Peter Patten presented the nemo stating that the st.aff recorunended denial .chuck ogilby, one of the applicants, siowed the plot pran and explainedthat l-6 acres in the center of their prot was considired flood prain. Heexplained that he felt the 2 units tooria tit well into their prot plan,that they wouldnrt be adding nore unit blocks, would not affect the parking,and they felt it rrculd be a pleasing addition architecturalry. He added
:11..,:l:Lt:]._:Fy had praciical difficulties, and rnentioned that theynao loor(ed at other sites up and doo* the val ley and felt that theirs wasrmique, because of the survly euor, aoong othei things.
PEc -s- 7/Ls/8t a
Stan Cole added that l/3 of their total land was affected by the flood plain.
Dick Ryan felt t.hat this was simply a circunstancc. Gerry White felt stronglythat a flood plain situation was not one upon which to grant a variance.Discussion followed concerning whether or not the flood plain was a hardship.
Jim moved and Scott seconded to deny the variance request. The vote was4-0 in favor of denial .
Gerry White rerninded them that they had l0 days in which to appeal to Council .
11. 4 requgst undgr.Ordinance 13, Series of 1981, for The VaIIey Phase 6for major revisions to an Cpprove<I site plan@designthe building locations and unit designs, along with a portion of the roadlayout. Applicant: Murray Properties Partnership of Dal las.
Peter Patten shbwed the model and site p1an. John Wheeler, representingthe appl icant answered questions. He explained that the cul de sacs werelarge to accomnodate large vehicles. Jim Morgan expressed concern aboutcut and fills being largely visible. He wanted to nake certain the irnpact
was downplayed so that the units didnrt give a wall-like facade. Gerryfelt that the tennis courts were alnost necessary to soft.en and add interest.scott wanted to know what will happen when this project went into DRB ifthe DRB decided there was too much visual impact, and Dick replied thatthat was the reason the DRB was invited on the field trip, however, the
DRB could still suggest changes. Dr. steinberg asked if it were possibleto narrow the road, and was told it was necessary to have then thit widthto accormnodate large veirrcres.. The ciustering and redesigning of thebuilding locations were discussed.
Jim rnoved and scott seconded to approve the revisions. The vote was 3-0rith Duane abstaining, in favor of approval of the site plan.
scott noved and Duane seconded that. the neeting be adjourned at 6:45 p.n.
I'lorrtt, -f.luty 13, 19,91
1. A1>proval ojl nj.trutcs of .lunc 22, I9Bl
2.A rcqtrcst for a sctb;rck vlrrilrlrcc to nrakc I q:111 I an cxistin.r; brrilding rvhich
eucrolrchcs 4t j.nto thc sirlc sctback on 5010 l.lain Gore l)rivc rvhich is par'h ol:
an unplattcd parccl in llighorn, titlcd Sulrrliirln Phase II. Applicant: Itctttlr:r
Construction i\tanagcmcn t, Inc.
7
4.
5.
Appeal of adninistratj.ve decision concerning
20, Potato Patch. Applicant: Jonine and .l ,J
Rcqucst to table density variance application
VaiI II at ll0l Vail View Drive. Applicants:
Jean Catoe, et al .
the color of a residence on Lot
. Col1ins.
for lot 12, Block A7, Caso.l.ar
Jean and Janes I'J. McDonal d,
6.
A request for anendment in accordance with Sections 18.66.110 through 18.66.160
to the zoning ordinance from Resiclential Cltrster to tlesidential Primary/ Secondary
in ordcr to build a residential unit together with a caretakerrs unit. Applicant:
Doyle llopkins.
A ninor subdivision request to vacate a lot line between lots A-l and A-2,
Lionsridge Filing #1. Applicant: AAV Linited Partnership.
7.A request for an extcrior :rlteration and
rmder Scction 18.26.045 on lot 4, Block 1
to add 3,950 squa:'e fcct of office space
and a rcqtrest for a varirnce to Section
- of incltrding one-half thc parking within
Vail Associates.
nrodification in Corunercial Core II,
, Vail Lionshead lst Filing,
to the Lionshead Gondola Building,
I8.26.150 to $aj.ve the requircnrcnt
the rnain building. -^.1;r !r:r't:
8. A request for an exterior alteration and rnodification jn Corunercial Core I
undei scction 18.24.065 olt Tracts A, B, C, l)lock 5c, vail Village lst Filing,
174 East Gore Creek Dri\'e, the Lodge at Vaii. , in ortler to adcl a 618 sqttale
foot restaurant addition and a retractable glass enclosure over the exj-sting
swinming pool . Applicant: . Lodge Propcrties, Inc.
9., A request for approval to replat Highland lleadols, Iots 26-42, the Highlatrd
park Spccial Dcr.elopnent District ll. The approval is ::equested to al lotv ucl.
road declications and vacations and lot linc remo.rals. This is a najor sub-
division requestcd under Chapter 17.04 of thc Vail llunicj.pal Code. APpIicant:
Surr Tcclr i'uii tiur's, Inc.
10. A request for a variancc to Scction 18.14.090 of the VaiI ltlunicipal Codc to
allorv tfie applicont to irtclttde l'lood pllin ulcs in calculating allorvablc dcnsity
in dcterrnining thc numbcl of units al lotrcd on the site of thc Intermountflin
Swim and Tennis Club, :rn rrrPlrttc'd l):trccl in Vail Intcrrnountlin Subdivisiolt.
The applicarrts ar.e thc Intct'rloutrtein .Swint nd Tennis Clrrl-r who rr'ish to constrtlct
2 additional units over thc prc'viotrs appt'ovll by Iiagle County.
11. A rcqucst undcr Ordinancc 13, Scrics of lg8l , for Thc \tallcy,
Phase 6 for nrnior'. r'cvisions to lrrr illlProved sjtc Pllll . l'hc proposal
i.s to rc-6csig1 thc brrildjnE.locltrr)tls ltttd ttttit dcsigns, nlong, with
a por.tiolr of tllc roltl lrtl'ottt' !\htrril)' I't.oPcl'tics l)nrttlct'ship of Dallas.
Publishctl in thc V:ril 'l't':ti I 'luly l{)' 1951
p
PLANI.IING AND ENVIROI,IMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA
Monday, June 8, l98l
2:00 p.m. STUDY SESSION
Gore Va11ey l,fater Issues
3:00 p.m.
l. Approval of minutes of ltlay 26, .|98'1.
2. A request for a variance to brlild on a s'lope in excess of 4M, another
variance to build within a set-back on lots A-l and A-2, Lionsridge,
between Sandstone Drive and Lions' Ridge Loop. Applicant: AAV Limited
Partnershi p.
3. App1ication for a density variance in gross resjdential floor area lnorder to build a duplex on Lot 12, B'lock A7, Casolar Vail II at ll0'lVail View Drive. Applicants: McDonald, Catoe, etc.,Pension
Retirement Trust.
4, Preliminary review of CCI and CCII Urban Design Guide Plan Projects
1. Hl'll Building additions
2. Lodge at Vai'1, swimning pool enclosure and restaurant addition.
3. Casino Building remode'l
4. Concert Ha'l'l P'laza Bujlding, interior and exterior remodel
5. Lionshead Gondo'la Building, add office space and convert 3 officesto cormercial .
6. Lionshead Study Area No. 5
Published in the Vail Trail June 5, l98l.
al:"ntlvair ---Restaurant {fit"L |)
Vail Village First Filing
The project consists of a 624 GSF RestaurantAddition and a new
Entr"ance to the Lodge
'l'lrc fol1r,,.'ittig irtf ort:ilt iort i', r'r:rIt ! 1',.:11 {'or :;'.rl'r:r itt;rl l,;, lht:
llcrlrrtl l:r'lur'': a l-ittll :rIprrtr,;r I r::rrr lrc 1;ivcn:
A. llllll.lriii(i Il l'l;llJAl,S
Iloof
Sidirg
Othcr I'iall l"latcrials
Fasc i a
Soffits
l{indo',rs
Itrindor,r 1'rim
Doo rs
Door Trirn
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Lhirrrlle)'s
Trash E:rcl osures
Greenhorrs es
Othe::
-ltlq I ll,-l'i'lt j :) _ r_j,-l-
Built-ug1cg!
Stucco exterior to match existing
(,o I or
None
None
None
Wood Frame with insul. glass
Wood
Wood panel doors
Wood
Ornamental I ron
Sheet metal painted to match exist.
None
None
None
Planters - stucco on masonry
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:
Phone :
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES
-476- 3051
Botanica'l Name
P:pglg r _IrSn'q!9!g_es
Pinus Mugo Pumilo
Common Name
Aspens
Dwarf Muqho Pine
Ruoff/Wentworth Architects, A. l.A.
Quanti ty
f,
Si ze
2 - 3" dia.
24:E0" spread
SHRUDS Juniperus Communis Saxitalis - Native Juniper 19 5 gal.
{r=I=+--f |o 32 lqt.
s0D
SEED TYPr.
SQUARE FOOTAGE
SQUARE FOOTAGE
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR i4ETHOD
OF EROSION CONTROL
C. Other Landscape Features (retaining walls, fences, swirming pools, etc.) P'lease specify.
oa
t
T
ITrt
.rlIt
ff
l
Jl-r.I
{tri
n-l
t
J
lr!c
5i
=rigFlo
Date of Applicfon Ilay 26, l9t.r
APPLICATION FORM FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I (CCI)
I. This procedure is requ.ired for_alteration of an existing building which
adds or removes iny-dn.tosed floor ut"u ot outdoor patio or rep'l acement.of
in-existing Uuifaiig-ihall be subiect to review by the Planning and Env1ron-
mental Cormission.
The appljcation will not be accepted all information is submitted.
A. NAME 0F APPLICANT-!95!9{ry Inc.
Vail , Crlprgds-91657 PHoNE 476-5011
B. NAME 0F APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Ruoff/wentworth Architects' A'I'A'
ADDRESS 500 Lionshead Mal'1, Vajl, Colorado 81657 PHoNE 476-3051
AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY ObJNER
SIGNATURE Thor G. Lobe
ADDRESS 774 E. Gore Creek rado 81657 PH0NE 476-sOi1
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
unti I
rties
ADDRESS Lodqe at Vail I74 Gore Creek Dri ve Vai'l Co'l orado
LEGAL DESCRIPTI0N Trac!q--1!C. Block 5C Vai I Vi'l1a 1st. Fil in
nlP'lr'E.FEE: Check for $101.50 enclosed
IMPRoVEMENT SURVEY: See attached improvement survey prepared by
Johnson, Kunkel & Assoc. dated 12li8,/80, revised I/I/81 '
LIST OF NAMES OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OI^INERS: SCC AttAChCd ]iSt Of 15
names.
drawings (4 copjes)
u.
II. SITE PLAN: See attached
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project includes two elements:
a retractable glass enc'losure over
A. Restaurant Addition:
a 618 sq. ft. restaurant addition and
the exi sti ng swimm'i ng Poo'l .
1. It.is proposed to extend the existing salt Lick Dining Room 17.5 ft.
to the'soirth in an area presently occupied by an uncovered concrete
terrace that is occasioni't ty used for outdoor surmer din'i ng. The
present dining facjlities in ttre Lodge are not'large enough to pl9-
ierly accommoiate their guests jn winter or during inclement weather
in the summer.
2. To rejnforce the 'i dentity of the
wil'l be renamed "Harry's Bar: and
remode'l ed Salt Lick D'ining Room it
will have its own entrY directlY
off of the wa1 kway from the Lodge to the Village Plaza. As part
of this improvement the ex'i sting east entry to the Lodge wil] also
be rebuilt and upgraded.
B. Pool Enclosure:
1. The exjsting Lodge swimming pool is located'in an area that is
completely inaAea in wintei ind partly shaded jn surrner. The en-
cloiure witt a'llow full winter utilizatjon of the poo1. By making
the lower half of the roof retractable in the summertime, use of
the pool can be retained in.a manner s'imjlar to the present'
?. Enclosing the poo'l will significantly reduce the amount of energy
required-to neit ttre water. Thjs reductjon dn energy use,wi'l 'l :at
least equal, and probab'ly exceed, the energy required-to heat the
space within the bnclosure during 1ts hours 9I use. Thus tota'l
energy requ'i rements for the enclosed pool wil'l be no greater than
now and util'ization will be markedly increased'
IV. URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:
A. Pedestrianization:
1. The pool enclosure has no impact on any public or private pedestrian
path.
?. The restaurant addjtion will clean up and improve the east entry
to the Lodge from the important pedestrian way leading to the
Vi I 1 age P'l aza .
B. Vehic'l e Penetration:
Both the restaurant addition and the pool enclosure are complete'ly
removed from and have no impact upon veh'ic1e traffic.
C. Streetscape Framework:
Neither the restaurant nor the pool enclosure will have any effect upon
streetscape enclosure. However, the restaurant improvements wi'l 'l
jmprove the quality of the walk'ing experiences from Vi1'lage P'laza to
the east Lodge entry.
D. Street Enclosure:
Neither the pool enc'l osure nor the restaurant additon is affected by
street encl osure considerations.
E. Street Edge:
apply to the pool enclosure.
wi'll move 18 feet closer to the
Plaza. The use of human scale
1. Steet edge considerations do not
2. The south wa]l of the restaurant
pedesterian way from the Village
o
details in this wal], such as tal'l windows with small awnings
ovei eactr and a1ow i'lanter be'low, plus night.views into the
iigit"d-dining-"oor wi'l'l 'irnprove ihb streel edge aspects of this
wal kway.
F. Bui'ldinq Heiqht:
The pool enclosure is 31 feet high on its h'igh s'ide.and 13 feet- high
on-i[s iow stOe. The restaurant-addition is-13 feet high. Both are
'lower than the exi sti ng bu'i ldi ngs wh'i ch they abut.
G. Views:
There are noidefignated view corridors in the area and there is no
impact on view from any pedestrian way.
H. Service and Delivery:
There will be no change jn service and delivery patterns at the Lodge.
I. Sun and Shade:
Shadow patterns are basica'l1y unaffdcted.
V. ZONING: See attached zoning check and area breakdowns'
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO THE TODGE'AT VAlL
The United Sfotes Foresi Service
P.O. Box 190
Minturn, Colorodo 81645
Rivo Ridge South Orner's Associotion
174 Gore. Creek Drive
Voif, Colorodo 81657
Rivo Ridge North O"rnerts Associotion
174 Gore Creek Drive
Voif, Colorodo 81657
Sitzmork Lodge
Robert Fritch
183 E. Gore Creek Drive
Voif, Colorodo 81657
Gore Creek Plozo Building
Jock Fritzlen
193 E. Gore Creek Drive
Voil, Colorodo 81657
Bell Torer Building
Clork Wi llinghom
1300 Bryon Towers
Dollos, Texos 75201
Lozier Arcode
Bob Lozier
P.O. Box 1325
Voil, Colorodo 81657
One Voil Ploce
Voil Associotes
P.O. Box 7
Voil, Colorodo .81657
Lodge Aportment Orner's Associotion
774 Gore Creek Drive
Voif , Colorodo 81657
Lodge South
174 Gore Creek Drive
Voif, Colorodo 81657
ZONING CHECK
The Lodge at Vail
#8102 B
Parts of Tracts A,B, & C, B'lock 5 C, Va'i1 Vi'l1age lst Fil ing
Zone: Cormercial Core I
Proposed 618 square feet of additiona1 dining at Salt Lick Restaurant.
18.24.100 Setbacks None Required
18.24.110 Distance Between Buildings None Required
78.24.120 Height Existing: 55' at main wing
of The Lodge 99' at the Lodge
South
Proposed: l3'
80% of Lot Area
807 (132,523) = 106,018
a'l ]owed GRFAExisting: 151,632 sq. ft. GRFA
in The Lodge at Vai'l and The
Lodge South.
246,340 total square foot-
age including garages and
conditional and pennitted
uses.
Proposed: 618 sq. ft. add-ition to restaurant.
18.24.130 Density Control
18.24.140 Reconstructio of Existing Uses N/A
18.24.150 Coveraqe 80% (132,523) = 105'018 sq. ft.
a'l I owed coverage
Existing Coverage:_ 49,958 sq. ft.
Proposed Coverage: 50,576 sq. ft.
Increase of 618 sq. ft.
18.24.170 Landscape & Site Deve'lopment New planter on east and
18.24.180 Parking & Loading
south sides of addition
Unchanged for Existing.
F\o.$
c?c!
(?)
@
v
@r\c\|
.o
s@\o
N
@
N
|r)
co.oc\
tr,
c\
o.
O
c')
N
o\
c!c\l
sN.o
ro
o.
rJ-)
@o.(')
.o
o..qf
@
(\I
c!.ota)
6l
c')o,N
FN@.O
o' o..o
oc,
rl-)c{o
.o
@.o
ro
I
trr)
I I I I c{
cf,
C9o.
@
(!.o|r)
(\l
I
ao.N
t
(?)o.o.
cr)
@(f)
.o
o.
@s.o I
o.q
O N
o.
sNo.
No
c\
oo.
s@ \Al.
l--
(f)>.o''-oN-ooF
FN@.Oc\6
F@
ar:
(\o.rr)
C\l
o.st
ro
o.q
ro
rfc\N
.o
.oo
|r)
'oc{
ra)
c\N(\
@ N
o..oN
lr)
c\c')@
c\.1
oo,tif
t
ro.oF\
C\
OO
.O c!
@c).o
o-j!ri
o)c
='=
=I
oo
u-
-l
o)c
;
'o
:
I
o
u-
<\l I
o,c
=
=I
o
u-
(r)
o)
=.=o:
I
o
LL
.sr
=
oo
u-
!f
-J
u-
.q
(')c
c
o
tr
rr)
_9
o
I
=
oz
I
o
o
oo
u-
oo
IL
-oc(\I
oo
U-
6
oJ
oo
C'
q,
cq,
co
oo
u-
oho€u-
LL-E
-c@cblr!
r- Crloobu---o€
-qo(\F
t
.o.q-6l
(\rro.s
ro
cf)
o
oF
.o
(\
(E,lf) r
C\c.)ro
rf)
-)
F
F
C.9-+O)
'13 --')c-
U
o-
5<U
e.o
Hrnos 3c€o]
{
-
-t@()cv0)o
T+
{=r€ i1'" k:\Jv + r---t
'
ogQ Ec o.r '--< f-o oD -o
=-og\ -J cu.:oY OJ- O) _c. t6 !s F=
I lvn lv lgcot tHL
d'r*eW r*#
MEMOMNDUM
T0: Plann'i ng and Environmenta'l Commission
FROM: Corrmunity Development Department
DATE: July 6, 1981
SUBJECT: Public hearing and consideration of an exterior a'l teration and
modification request in Conmercia'l Core I for- the additjon of
restaurant space and a retractable 91ass enclosure over the
existing swiinming pool at the Lodge at Vail. Applicant: Lodge
Properties, Inc.
REQUEST:
The app'l icant is request'i ng to add approximately 620 square feet to
the Sa1 t Lick Dining Room which will be renamed Harry's Bar. Thiswill be a one story addition to the south side of the restaurant
area. Also proposed js to enc'l ose the existjng Lodge swirm'ing
Pool .
A. COMPLIANCE l,lITH PURPOSE SECTION
.|8.24.010 Purpose
The Commercial Core I District is intended to provide sites and to maintain the
unique character of the Vail ViIlage Commercial Area, with its mixture of'l odges
and commercia'l establjshments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The
Conrnercial Core I Distri ct is intended to ensure adequate light, air' open space
and other amenities appropriate to the pennitted types of buildings and uses.
The District regulations in accordance with the Vai'l Vi'llage Urban Design Guide
P'lan and Design Cons'iderations prescribe sjte development standards that are
'intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered
arrangements of bujldjngs fronting on pedestrian ways and pubf ic areenways and to
ensuri continuation of building scale and archjtectural qua'lities that d'istinguish
the Vi '11 age.
The Comrnunity Development Department considers that the proposed changes !o lltgLodge at Vail do conform with the Conrnercial Core I District, and the Vail Village
Urban Design Guide Plan.
B. COMPLIANCE l,lITH THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN AND DESIGN
l. Sub-area concepts of Urban Design Guide Plan
No sub-area concept of the P1 an is rel ated to this proposal .
2. Pedestrianization
The restaurant expansion or covering the pool will not have any effect
on pedestrianization.
-=\
Lodge Additions -2- ,rt I
3. Vehicle Penetration: No change
4.Street Scope jluns"el!: No change
5. Street Enclosure: No change
6. Stregt Edge: No change
l,__B'l4jj1g_!9$E--
The pool enclosure is 31 feet high on the high side and 13 feet on the
low side, One connent that came out of the preliminary review of the
Planning and Environmental Conrnission neeting of June 8, 1981 was the
3l foot height. The Design Review Board will review in detail this concern
when the proposal is presented to thern to see if this should be at a reduced
height, Height of the restaurant addition is 13 feet.
8, Views:
There is no designated view corridor that would be affected by either
proposal .
9, Service and Delivery: No change.
10. Sun Shade: Not affected by the proposal.
.ZON ING CONS I.DERA.T IONS
Parking: The applicantfor the restaurant.
will be required to pay the applicable parking fee
DESIGN CONSIDERAT.I ONS
The Design Review Board will
and for the enclosed pool .
ENERGY CONSERVATION
review the architectural plans for the restaurant
In the design of the enclosed pool area, energy conservation measures
should be introduced.
RECOMI',IENDATI0N:
The community Development Departnent reconnends approval of the requestfor the restaurant expansion and covering the swimrning pool. The depa.trentconsiders the request in confornance with the Vail Vil lage Urban Design GuidePlan and Design Considerations.
1. Subject to energy conservation neasures being part of the design of the enclosedpool.
2. That the applicant agree to participate in and not remonstrate against a specialinprovenent district when one is forned for the Vail Village area.
-3- 7/rs/8la
s. A reouest for anendment in accordance with Sections 18.66.110 through 18.66.160
v
in order to build a residential unit together with a caretakerrs tutit.
APPIicant: DoYle HoPkins.
After beginning discussion, it was discovered that there were sone adjacent
property or,ners on the Ridge who werenrt notified of the neeting. Ed Drager
istla to table the item until the next rneeting. Duane rnoved and Jin seconded
to table this untit the next regular neeting. Vote was 4-D (Dan had left.)
6. A ninor subdivision request to vacate a lot line betlveen lots A-1 and A-?,.
Peter Patten explained the neno, and Dave Green representing Architerra said
that this was really overlooked at the previous meeting when the project had
been approved, Gerry White stated that, while he was opposed to the project
itself, this point was a ninor one.
D,rane noved and Jin seconded to glant the request to vacate the lot line.
The vote was 4-0 in favor.
7- A reouest for sn exterior alteration and nodification in Connercial Core II,
under section fA' 3,950 square feet of office space to the Lionshead Gondola Building, and a request
for a variance to Section I8,26.1 50 to waive the requirenent of including one
half the parking within the nain building. Applicant: Vail Associates.
Peter Patten explained the request, including an exPlanation of the number of. parking units that Vail Associates have for their enployees, which the stdff
felt was adequate. Ton Leonard of Vail Associates explained that they did not
have sufficient office space for their employees. Dr. Steinberg of. the Town
Council wanted to be assured that the parking lots were zoned for pirking only,
and Dick Ryan assured hin that they were. Scott was concerned that in future
years, it night not be rernembered that this variance r,tas granted on the basis
of the existing spaces. Ton Leonard reninded them that VA had 140 extra parking
spaces. Discussion of the one condition, that the applicant agrees to parti:
cipate in and not renonstrate against a special improvenent district when one
is forrned for the Lionshead area, followed.
Jin noved and Duane seconded to approve the request as stated in the staff neno
of July 6, 1981 including the condition described above. The vote was 5-1,
Scott opposed because he wasnrt cornfortable with the parking situation.
/'. .Public. hearing and consideration of an exterior alteration and nodification
act_
able glass enclosure over the existing swirudng Pool at the Lodge at Vail .
Applicant: Lodge ProPerties' Inc'
Dick Ryan exPlained that the applicant had
addition.. Ken $lentworth, architect for the
that the restaurant addition would require
ernphasized that his firm felt that nothing
the open area and that Pedestrian activity
and added that his concern was with quality
decided to ask only for the restaurant
applicant showed Plans and stated
2 to 4 more Parking sPaces. He
is happening around this edge of
would be increased. Duane agreed
instead of quantitY. GerrY hhite
PEc _4- 7/Ls/8r o
felt that there was alreadY one
walkway front
was alreadyit was not,and that the sPace was valuable'
Duane moved and Jim seconded to aPProve the modifi.cation of the restaurant
subject to conditiot #2 of the staff memo, that the applicant agree to Parti-
cipate in and not renonstrate against a special iurprovenent district when
one is formed for the Vail Village area'
The vote was 2 for (Duane and Jim) and 2 against (Gerry and Scott). Scott
was against encroaching uPon- open_ sPac€. Gerry reninded the applicant
that fr'e had 10 days to appeal to Town Council-
9. A request €or approval to replat Hig]tland Meadows, lots 26-42, the Highland
new road dedications and vacations and lot line renovals. This is a najor
subdivision requested under Chapter 17.04 of the Vail llunicipal Code.
Applicant: Srm Tech Builders, Inc'
Peter Patten explained that. this rePlat was a nere technicality after approval
of SDD ll. (The applicant did not aPPear.) Dave and lrlrs. Edeen appeared
to voice their concern about a drainage problen they were having, with water
running off of Highland Park onto their 1and. They stated that they had
been washed out several tirnes in the Past weeks. Dick Ryan stated that
the new plat would take care of drainage with the redesign of thc road.
Scott suggested they use a nethod to divert the water tenporarily as was
demonstrated by Architerra. Larry Eskwith stated that both temporary and
pErrnanent diversion of water would be a reasonable condition of approval .
Scott moved and Duane seconded that the replat be approved on condition
that temporary relief of the drainage problern that exists for the Edeens
be solved. Water nust be diverted to the drainage system shown on the plat
within 15 days of final approval of the plat.
The vote was 4-0, unanimous approval with the condition stated.
10, A request for a variance to Section 18.14.090 of the Vail Municipal Code
flood plCin area in calculating al lowable
density in detennining the nurnber of units allowed on the site of the lnter-
rnountain Swim and Tenn j.s Club, an unplatted parcel in Vail Internountain
Subdivision. Applicants: Intermountain Swin and Tennis Club who uish to
construct 2 additional units over the previous approval by Eagle County.
Peter Patten presented the neno stating that the staff reconrncndcd dcnial .
Chuck Ogilby, one of the applicants, showed the plot plan and cxPlained
that 1.6 acres in the center of their plot was considered flood plain. l{e
explained that he felt the 2 units would fit well into their plot Plan,
thit they wouldnrt be adding nore unit blocks, would not affect thc parking,
and they felt it would be a pleasing addition architecturally. Hc added
that thly felt they had practical difficulties, and ncntioncd that they
had looked at other sites up and down the val lcy and felt that thcirs was
unique, because of the survey error, atnong othcr thinSs.
Wall Street. Ken
there. GerrY felt
najor entrance to the Lodge with a najor
stated that he felt they were enhancing what
that while it seens like a small encroachnent,
It
Hg
Floeq
-oEF{
€Ftr-f(5aa
€
qf(t
box lfl)
vail, colorado 81657
{3031 47S5613
T\
December lq, 1980 )
\__.-l\lrlr. Ken llentworlh
Ruof f 4,lentworth Arch i tects
Drawer 2178
Vail , Co]orado 81657
department of community dwelopment
Dear Ken:
The Planning and Environmental Conmission at their meeting on
December 8,-1980 had a preliminary review on-the proposed addition
for new first f'loor office space and second floor kitchen storage
and employee dining. They determined that this proposa'l had no
signiflcant impacts and would not be a plan amendrent and wou'ld
fol'lov the normal processing of an exterior alteration or modification
procedure. Your pioject wil'l be schedu]ed before the Planning and
Environmental Conmission on January 26th.
The office use js not specifically permitted on the first f'loor of
Comrercial Core I. Ho1i:ver, the Planning and Environmental Cormission
considered that as long as the offices were used on'ly for the
operation of the lodge, this space would be accepted as an-accessory
use. In the future this space dould not be changed from office spacefor lodge operation to general office space or a real estate office.
llith the proposed addition landscaping wou'ld be removed from the
property. The zoning ordinance states that "no reduction in land-
3cabe aiea shall be permitted without significant cause shown by
the applicant, or as'specified in the Vail Village Design Considerations."
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Si ncere]y,
. ,/ .'1{)z r 4, (;+-
Dick Ryan, Director
Department of Cormunity Development
DR:df
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO THE TODGE AT VAIL
The United Stotes Forest Service
P.O. Box 190
Minturn, Colorodo 81645
Rivo Ridge South OrnerJlAssociotion
174 Gqe Creek Drive
Voil, Colorodo 81657
Rivo Ridge North OrvnerlfAssociofion
174 Gore Creek Drive
Voil, Colorodo 81657
Sitzmork Lodge
Robert Fritch
183 E. Gore Creek Drive
Voi[, Colorodo 81657
Gore Creek Plozo Buitding
Jock Fritzlen
193 E. Gore Creek Drive
Voil, Colgrodo 81657
Bell Tonver Building
Clork Willinghom
1300 Bryon Towers
Dotlosr, Texoi 75201
Lozier Arcode
Bob Lozier
P.O. Box 1325
Voil, Colorodo 81657
One Voil Ploce
Voi I Associotes
P.O. Box 7
Voil, Colorodo 8.1657
Lodge Aportment Onnerd Associotion
174 Gare Creek Drive
Voil, Colorodo 81657
Lodge South
174 Gore Creek Drive
Voil, Colorodo 81657
l.
Doteof Apflicoti%
APPLICATION FORM FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I ( CCI )
This procedure is required for olterotion of on existing bui lding which odds or
removes ony enclosed floor oreo or ouldoor Potio or rePlocement of on existing
building sholl be subiect to review by the Plonning ond Environmentol Commission.
The opplicotion will not be occePted until oll informotion is submitted '
A. NAME OF APPLICANT e Properties 'lnc .
B. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Ruoffflentwo'th 4Et!e9t'r j-:!.4
PH ONE 476-3051
Suite 200 600 S. CherrY Street
ADDRESS Denver. Colorodo 80222 PHONE (303) 292-3432
Suire 200 600 S. Cherry SrreetADDRESS Denver. Colorodo 80221 PHONE (3O3) 292-3432
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS Lodoe ot Voil 174 E. Gore Creek Drive Voil, Colorodo
81557
c
{'(ot fc'
Ce'\
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Trocts A, B, C, Block 5C, Voil Villoge lst Filing
E. FEE $ 100.00 plus l5g for eoch property orner to be notified'
F. IMPROVEMENT 5URVEY OF PROPERTY SHOWING PROPERTY LINES AND
LOCATION OF BUIIDING AND ANY IMPROVEMENTS ON THE LAND.
G. A LIST OF THE N,AME OF OWNERS OF ALL PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY.
Site Plon - See ottoched drowings.
Purpose - The proposed oddition is opproximotely 2,200 sguore feet of suPPlementol
offices, kifchen storoge, employeers dining ond o new stoir occupying two floors on
the souihwest end of the moin wing of the Lodge ot Voil. Due fo the uniformify of
focode treotments on the west elevotion, woll finishes ond window detoils on the
oddition reflect those of the existing building.
Urbon Design Considerotions
A. Pedestrionizotion: Hotel guests ond employee's who pork in the southernmost
il.
ilt.
lv.
Portion of lhe porking lot ore primorily the only people whowill poss directly in
front of the oddition.
B. Vehicle Penetrotion: Unchonged from existing except 7 porking spoces in front
of oddition ore six feet furthei into oisle, leot,ing ror" ihon odeguote spoce for
bocking ond snow removol .
C. Slreetscope Fromework: Addition is off of street ond does not offect streetscope
fromeworks
D. Street Enclosure: Addiiion dces not offect sfreet enc Josure .
E. Street Edge: Addition does not offecl street edge.
F. Building Height: 25'ot roof intersection with existing woll.
G. Views: Not opplicoble.
H. Sun Shode Considerotions: Entire south portion of the Lodge of Voil is shoded
by the l-odge South in fhe lote ofternoon. The new oddition does not cost shodovvs
on odiocent properties or public right of woy.
RUOFFAVENT\^1qts|ARCH rTECT S, A . I .A .
November 20, 198-f
ZONING CHECK
The Lodge ot Voil
rgoo5
Ports of Trocts A, B, & C, Block 5C, Voil Vi lloge lst Filing
Zone: Commerciol Core I
Proposed oddition is21200 grcss squore feet of offices, kitchen storoge, employee dining. ond o
new stoir occupying two floors on the southwest end of the moin wing of the Lodge ot Voil.
18.24. 100
r8.24. I l0
18.24.120
r8.24. r30
Height
Density Conirol
Setbocks None Required
Distonce Between Buildinos None Reouired
Exisiing: 55' ot moin wing of The Lodge
99'ot the Lodge South
Proposed: 25' ot roof interseciion wi th
exisling wo | |
80% of Lot Areo
80o/o (132,523) = 106,018 ollowed GRFA
Existing: 151,632 sq. ft. GRFA in The
Lodge ot Voil ond The Lodge South +
37,972 sq. ft. (common oreos including
corridors, lobbies, meeting rooms, ond
goroges in excess of ZOc/o of GRFA) -
189,604 sq. ft. Toiol Existing GRFA
25,493 odditionol sq . ft. of speciol use
spoce for offices ond Lodge operotions.
Proposed: 540 sq. ft. GRFA ot employee's
dining + 259 sq. ft. (corridors over 20olo
of the new 504 sq. ft, GRFA)=
799sq. ft. Totol New QB!!
I 198 sq. ft. oddiiionol sq. ft. of speciol
use spoce for new kitchen storoge ond
offices.
Existing Uses N/A
Londscoping & Site
Porking & Looding
80o/o (132,523) = 106,018 sq. ft. ollc'r',red
cove roge
Existing Coveroge: 49,958 sq. ft.
Proposed:Coveroge: 51r055 sg. ft.
Increose ,'of 1,097 sq . ft.
Development Unchonged for Existing
Reconsfruction of
Cove roge
t. f*(.,,60 = lobrotS Alfuwe4
t5l/ b37 €Tls'fr{Q 'a?/€7--
Zo% a-r /o?aro4'f'tgv W efuau</
&rq"* /,a.V :.z//toig f'frtz'- / -\' " -5> 3Z/772,e/*zruqrdu€Z
7zz4/a//o. ltas - /o6/E .4/t'zd5?
- a rF,/.'€/ f/rtga4 //ez6,€z>a6'.,/az tz
18.24.140
18.24.150
18.24.170
18.24. 180 Unchonged for Existing
t . (0, U-'-- &r*zo-,-+ ct .tfl- f/'+ l-4 * , /- 1,40v .-71..+a- /ot,,^77r1- ,,o-n - fury+"-*%
Exterior Modification Review@ciates
December 3, 1980
Addition to The Lodge at Vail
1. Improvement survey?
2. Not covered by sub Area Guide Plan - so only U.D. consideration
applv.
3. Wonder if there's any merit in overlapping the north end of the
addition onto the reiidential facade...(see west elevation) seems
to encroach on balcony spaces a 1ittle awkwardly on the secondfloor, and grcund f'loor exit door swings in front of residential
windows. Is there any reason not to shift the who'ld thing south
a few feet?
4. Most of my corments are probably DRB issues:
*fenestration doesn't look consistent on west elevation -
either floor.*can't tell if siding/stucco treatment is truly in keeping
w/ adjacent b'ldg.*height of ground f'loor stucco wall seems just a little out of
scale (subjective) and second f'loor a little too short someho,r...(admitted, this is not a major pedestrian throughway).
5. 0verall seems adequate from visual points. (Zoning oompliance
may be another issue...)
q,
/0,
a
ZONING CHECK
The Lodge oi Voil
#aoos
Ports of Trocts A, B, & C, Block 5 C, Voil Villoge lst Filing
Zonez Commerciol Core I
Proposed oddition is2,200 gross squore feet of offices, kitchen sioroge, employee dining, ond o
new stoir occupying lwo floors on the southwest end of the moin wing of the Lodge of Voil.
18.24.100 Seibocla None Required
, 18.24.1l0 Distonce Between Buildings None Required
18.24.120 Height Existing: 55' ot moin wing of The Lodge
99' ot the Lodge Sotrth
Proposed: 25t ot roof interseclion wiih
existing woll
18.24.130 Density Conirol 8Oo/o of Lot Areo
80"/o (132,523) = 106,018 olloned GRFA
Existing: 151,632 sq. ft. GRFA in The
Lodge oi Voil ond The l-odge South
25,4yJ odditionol sq. ft. of speciol
use sPoce for offi ces ond Lodge
. oPerotions.
Proposed: 540 sq. ft. GRFA ot employee's
dining.
ll98sq. fi. odditionol sq. ft. of
:r.ilj ili'5tll.llr new kitchen
18.24.140 Reconstruction of Existing Uses N/A
18.24.150 coveroge 80"/" (132,523) = 106,018 sq. ft. ollowed
coveroge
Existing Coveroge: 49'958 sq. ft.
Proposed Coveroge: 51r055 sq. ft.
Increqse of 11097 sq. ft.
18.24.170 Londscoping & Site Development Unchonged for Existing
18.24.180 Porking & Looding Unchonged for Exisiing
No.rt
(t(\
(f)
@
t
@N(\l
\o
'sr@\o
N
N
ro
@\oc\
rr)
N
(.)
o.
@
c7)
r..
@I
6l(!
st\\o
ro
o.
(f)
lo
@o.C'
\o
o.I@
c{
c\l.oro
N
(f,o.N
FN@\O@F
o. o..o
o--o=
loC\o
.o
o@\o
lo
t
{lo
I I
OO(\|
cf)
(f)o,
@
I I
GI\oro(\I
IN
t
c')o'o.
(t
@c.).ooo.
Orrt\o I
OYo I
@
|.\
o.
.tt\o.
No(.)
N
@oo.
.{t
@
(')\o.ON3oF
Ft\
co \oNO\
F@
o*-
(\o.|r)
GI
os
ro
oY
lo
\t(\lN
\o
o\o
u)
@.oc\
lo
<\NC\
o@(-)
N I
o.\oN
ro
<\
c\
oo.s
$
ro\oT\(\
I
ooOO\O <\t
@o.o
o-'oi
o)
c
o
I
o
u-
o,.s
=.Eo
=I
o
II
E(\
ctc
;
c
o:
1
o
ll-
E(t
o)c
;>
.=o
I
oo
lJ-
'sr
CD
=
o
=tro
oo
tl-
.a-.(.
o
-J
oo
Lt-
I
'rt
c
c
o
-t,
o
lJ-
--c
l.r)
oJ
oo
lJ-
--cro
o)
;
{-
oz
I
oo)
o
i()
oo
u-
oo
II
-oc6l
o
u--
-o
cf)
oJ
L'E
-o
(Y)
0)
Eo
CD
o
II
oho
O 1l-
lJ- I
-g@6l
'ELC\oo.5
t!-Eg
-co\! F
oooo
o.rr(.)
\otN
(\lo.qt
\o
c')
\oroN
corr)
6l(?)\o
ro
o
oF
.9-.r- O
!ft-oU
c9oE0)
6<U
II
.o
J
FoF
'livn rv lccot lHr Hrnol rcoo'l
BJts)
6-$s-
{
i,osg';@t+{=E5- o( ;+>- F6..::6> _Eco-fo o)o -o
= -o -o o<gE F+--9 o5 Pi? Ie=z \