HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 6, 2020_MinutesPublic Notice - Art in Public Places Board Meeting Minutes
Monday, January 6, 2020 - 8:30 a.m.
Town Council Chambers
1. Roll call and approval of minutes from December 2nd meeting.
2.No citizen input.
3. Ford Park Art Space- HTA Architects – Todd Oppenheimer, TOV Capital Projects Manager
•Review of the HTA recommendations (presentation attached) and three options for the art studio space
in Ford Park. As we had monies left in the contract, we are awaiting the drawings for a developed
possible third option for the space.
•While we have identified the uses for the space, the Board needs to focus on how it aligns with AIPP
vision and the benefits it would provide the community at large. Kathy comments it fulfills the
educational component of AIPP’s mission and Trish remarks while engaging the community.
•Todd reviews the timeline of meetings with HTA including an August site-visit with the architects and
structural engineer. It was the first thorough examination of the building. The inspection concluded
there is very little to salvage in the existing structure. The floor is rotted wood sitting on the ground and
there is essentially no foundation. The construction of the building itself is peculiar. There is not much to
evaluate from a structural engineer’s standpoint. It was in a sense thrown together with the horizontal
boards being nailed together with 2 x 2s. There has also been an addition with the entry way. Much has
been added and removed since it was originally built. The Victorian shingles in the eaves were added
later. New windows and roof shingles have also been added. There is not much remaining to the
historic context of the building as it presently stands. It would be considerably more expensive to work
with the existing structure and salvaging any materials rather than removing and replicating the building
in a complimentary design.
•Kathy remarks we need to determine the historic value of the building. We have learned it is much more
costly to restore it versus replace it. The uses have been determined for the existing size. A larger scale
would clearly accommodate more uses which we should explore. She comments we should look at
communicating our findings with Council representatives for feedback.
•There is potential for the footprint to grow the existing space to provide more light and uses, water, sink,
bathroom, insulation, ADA compliance and code requirements while complimenting the design
elements and preserving the character of the present structure.
•Margaret thinks we need to be efficient in going forward. It is an old building that is falling apart, serving
no purpose to the community in a prime location. We should look at what would be best ultimately for
serving the community and promoting the educational potential.
•Kara remarks that we should wait for the third rendering from HTA to then reassess and address our
findings. Margaret and Julie think we need to come together as a board after the review of the third
proposal. It is premature to go forward without a thoughtful plan looking at the potential of the third
proposal. Trish comments that we need to address the new concept we would like to foster as a Board
with a shift in the vision of the existing structure as the present building cannot be saved.
•The operational costs should also be evaluated. Todd comments saving it is not the most economical
decision and you lose square footage within the interior. Perhaps the additional requirements
(bathroom, storage, etc.) can be added via a breezeway to the existing footprint. Kathy remarks this is
in the purview of how the masterplan is presently written.
• We should have the third proposal to discuss further at the next meeting.
4. Review of Winterfest Programs – Lantern Walk & Ice/Light Installations
• Molly updates the Board about vandalism to the Winterfest ice sculptures. She reported it to the police
and they recovered video of the act of vandalism. It happened at 10:13 p.m. on January 2. It is an open
investigation by the Vail Police. We submitted the percentage of damage to the installation at $2,000.
Paul is going to address the damaged portion.
• Lantern Workshops – Well attended. Library complimented the clean-up. The assistance from
facilities with tables/chairs/trash helped it run smoothly as well. Trish helped with the late guests and
handing out the swag at workshop. Guests were complimentary about this as well.
• Lantern Walk – Doe Browning was very pleased with the walk this year and the run of show. Santa
also commented that it ran smoothly from his perspective, especially with the growing attendance. We
have great photos from Townsend Bessent.
• Ice/Light – Molly remarks that we have made the light show faster with more dramatic changes since
the opening night on Dec. 22. The installation took place over several days with all the lights being
connected then sourced to the TOV electrical outlets and controlled by a computer system which Alt
Ethos connects to via a wifi source. The slow fades we directed to Alt Ethos appear more ambient at
this pace, so she asked them to mix it up and speed the pace. The bridge lighting has been popular
with lots of photos being taken at night, but it is getting wear and tear. Erin from Alt Ethos has come
back to address some of the damage and tighten up the tubing. Kathy and Kara remark that they
expected more “wow” with the lights. Kathy would like to see a variety of lights. She didn’t think the
lights on the balcony were effective due to reflection. Molly suggests going into Sweet Basil to view the
light projecting which is very visible from their dining areas. Molly will ask Erin to speed up the show
even more and alternate the lights. Molly explains that the tubing was placed on the tops of the railing
for a clean site-line. Kathy and Kara did not like the placement of the tubing for the bridge. Molly
explains that the trenching and cabling, as well as the access to TOV electricity did limit being able to
pull lights to the creek side area of the trees, so Erin focused more along the proximity to the
promenade. Molly will go back to Alt Ethos to make these adjustments. She asks the Board to return to
the promenade to see any changes for discussion at our February meeting. She will send photos to the
Board in the interim. Molly shows the “test” photos from November, but comments now that the
mountain is open there is much more ambient lighting with the shops, restaurants, and lodging to the
Gore Creek Promenade area.
• Reception – Molly is working with Sweet Basil on a thank you reception for Doe.
• Ice – The board compliments the ice installation and think it is one of the best installations Paul has
created. Kara feels like he exceeded the Board’s expectations with this year’s Winterfest installation.
The Board would like to recognize and commend his execution of the installation with a bonus from the
project’s contingency budget.
5. Summer 2020 installation discussion
• Ladies Fancy Work Society site visit towards the middle of January.
• Koko Bayer (cantina wall) – We may want to revisit the location now that there is a bar at the site. Molly
will meet facilities to look at interior spaces
• Molly will also look at potential mural locations within the parking structures with the facilities.
6. Coordinator updates.
• Molly thanks Kathy and Trish for sitting in on the selection for the environmental installation. It was
awarded to Jenna Oppenheimer.
• Molly reviews the Town Council presentation she and Kara made to Council (attached).
• We have had 5 instances of graffiti on the RSES garage public art by John Fleming. Public Works has
been very responsive in cleaning the installation.
• Art Walks – 1st & 3rd Wednesdays Jan 15 – April 15 – The Board does not want to have docents to
provide additional art walks. They do not wish to dilute the tour since it receives so much media &
positive feedback.
• Seibert sculpture has been placed on the Promenade as a temporary location until a permanent
installation this Spring. Molly comments that it is nice that it has arrived, and we can evaluate the
location if necessary now that we are able to experience the scale of the work.
• Molly informs the Board that Trish has an exhibition in the Vail Public Library’s community room.
7. Other matters from the Board. (5 mins)
• Julie remarks about the totem sculpture by Jaime Molina on 6th and Federal.
• Margaret compliments the West Vail lights. She would like Molly to go to Greg Hall to express the AIPP
Board’s compliments of the lights.
• Margaret comments on an environmental installation on a beach of a wire-formed fish that people are
to deposit their recyclables.
8. Meeting adjourned.
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 1
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS81808
1
8
2
81
8
4
8
1
8
6
818881
9
0
8
1
9
2
8
1
9
481948196 8
1
9
68198 8
1
9
8
2 5 10 40
SITE PLAN
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 2
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
VAIL ARTS CABIN
EVALUATION REPORT:
EXTERIOR
Existing condition analysis - 8/14/19 Field trip Observations
Siding: Most of the narrow siding seems in fairly good shape with the exception of
the siding close to grade where some of it is actually below grade. (fig.1) This siding
has rotted out some. Sections of the rim joist and sill plate are also below grade and
are rotten as well. (fig.2) Looks like the surrounding grade was elevated higher than
the original at some point. The triangular gable ends are shingled with wood shingles
which are unlikely to be original. (fig.3)
Roof: The roof material while not “historic” seems to be in fairly good shape in
general and will probably last for several more years. (fig.4)
Windows: The widows appear to have been replaced fairly recently
and are in decent shape. They would, however, probably not comply
with current energy codes.
fig.2fig.1
fig.4
fig.3
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 3
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
VAIL ARTS CABIN
EVALUATION REPORT:
INTERIOR
Structure/Foundations: The foundations, while they appear not to have shifted too much, are
minimal, close to grade, and not below frost. (fig.5) As a result the framing they support
have become rotten. A new perimeter foundation with footers below frost and top 6 to 8
inches above grade will be a necessary first step in stabilizing what is left of the original
structure.
Floor: The floor structure which is very close to the dirt in the minimal “crawlspace” is rotten
and deformed in many places especially on the east side, and will have to be entirely
replaced once the building has been re-founded. (fig.6)
Walls: The walls have a very unusual structure comprised of 2x2 studs and 1x sheathing.
(fig.7) They seem to be in good enough shape and might be adequate structurally. They
have served so far. On the other hand they provide no space for insulation and they would
most likely be “sistered” with 2x6 members anyway. While interesting as an historic feature,
the structure would not be visible unless the reinforcement and insulation happened on the
exterior. The exposed 2x2s on the interior would be interesting but not very functional for art.
Roof: The roof structure is a bizarre combination of 2x4 rafters supplemented with randomly
placed vertical props. (fig.8) It has, of course, lasted until now without noticeable
deformation, but would have to be seriously reinforced with sistered joists and ties to
accommodate the additional snow loads of insulated space.
Surfaces: most of the interior surfaces have been removed and the small amount remaining
are not of historic value.
Mechanical: There is evidence of some gas wall heaters, but all the equipment has been
removed. The roof is framed to allow for a chimney in the approximate middle of the space
but the masonry or other chimney structures have been removed.
(fig.9)
Electrical: Any remaining existing wiring is not functional.
Plumbing: The existing building does not appear to have had any plumbing.
fig.8
fig.7
fig.9
fig.5 fig.6
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 4
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
VAIL ARTS CABIN POTENTIAL
PROJECT OPTIONS
Potential Project Options: We present three basic options for your consideration to make a
space that might be useful for arts programs.
2.
1.
3.
Minimal version: Move structure, build new foundation, replace on new
foundation, stabilize structure, add basic electrical wiring, insulate within
existing framing, provide interior surfaces with minimal improvements.
Least cost. (model 1)
Basic accommodation of Arts activities within existing structure to
preserve some of the existing structure for historic reasons: Move
structure, build new foundation, replace on new foundation, restore and
remodel existing structure with new features such as accessible
bathroom, utility sink, chair and art supply storage, a large west window,
new entrance and porch, new larger windows and possible skylights.
Reinforce roof and wall structure and insulate. Add electric forced air heat
and mechanical ventilation with an energy recovery unit, and possibly
radiant heat. Cost varies with the inclusion of the various amenities, but
the refurbish and restoration and remodeling process is the most
expensive. (model 2)
Demolish existing structure and build a new structure on a new
foundation that resembles the existing building, but has the features and
systems to accommodate all the anticipated arts needs. This new
structure could be somewhat larger than the existing structure, but would
be similar enough in shape, and materials to be mistaken for the original.
Overall cost will vary depending on the scale and amenities, but the
process is the least cost per conditioned space.
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 5
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
This version would involve the minimal amount of cost to stabilize the existing structure, but would not result in a space that would be very useful as an arts facility
as it would not have a bathroom, heat, or ventilation. The most minimal version would have a new foundation with crawlspace, a new flat floor, and some new
lighting. The existing structure would be reinforced only as required, original surfaces removed, and the remaining structure painted white to brighten space. It
would not have plumbing, heat or only minimal heat so it would not need to be insulated. This version would only be able to be used in the summer. Its purpose
would be to preserve and stabilize the “historic” structure and retain some possibility for arts use or storage.
Version 2 would attempt to make the most useful space possible for arts activities within the confines of the existing structure. In this case some of the purely
historic qualities would be sacrificed in order to make a functional arts facility. From the outside the building would look pretty much the way it does now with the
exception of a porch entry, a large west window for light, and longer windows in general. Other exterior modifications might include skylights, metal roof, new paint
scheme, and ventilation vents. Inside there would be an accessible bathroom, utility sink and counter, supply and stacking chair storage. Plumbing would probably
mean the space would be winterized, insulated, and then ventilated with an energy recovery system. Insulation if placed in the walls would reduce the amount of
floor area significantly or if done on the outside would add some bulk to the exterior historic proportions. The resulting space could accommodate a single artist in
residence or workspace at folding tables for 12 to 16 at folding tables. Working in and around the existing structure would no doubt involve considerable expense
depending on how much of the existing structure would have to remain. “Sistering” the rafters and studs is a tedious labor-intensive operation and in the end
would be invisible. As previously mentioned the floor joists and flooring will have to be replaced in any case. The only reason for approach #2 would be to retain
as much original historic material as possible or to save particular historic features.
Given the expense of working within and modifying an imperfect existing structure, with pretty much no useful components, it makes by far the most sense from an
economic standpoint to build a new structure from scratch. The new building could be exactly like the existing one, or it could incorporate the new features
proposed in alternative #2, or it could be slightly larger to provide more space yet retain similar proportions and window configurations. A new building of this type,
even if somewhat larger, would be considerably less expensive, and could be designed to accommodate the anticipated arts uses more closely. We are not in a
position to assess the historic value of the cabin, or which of its qualities the town of Vail values, but from a purely economic point of view, it makes much more
sense to demolish the structure and build from scratch.
We have included a couple of very rough sketches to illustrate how a new structure might add significantly to the useful area. It would pretty much double the
useful area with an addition that is basically the same shape as the original repeated to the north, and connected with a “transparent” (glass) section. The glass
section would make a clear separation between the historic resource and the new construction and provide light to the workspace. Also the illustration shows the
possibility of opening up the entire end of the new portion with glass towards the flat grassy area to the north allowing activities to flow out doors.
VAIL ARTS CABIN
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
2.
1.
3.
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 6
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
26'-1 1/4"5'-1 1/4"
31'-2 1/4"1'-9 3/4"10'2'-2 1/4"14'3
Page 7
1
Page 7
4
Page 7
2
Page 7
338 sq ft
4 8
1.
EXISTING FLOOR PLAN
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 7
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
4 8
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
EASTNORTH
WESTSOUTH
1.
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 8
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS8'4'-2"8'-1/2"2'1'-10 1/2"8'6"2'3'-8"5'-1 1/4"
35'-4 1/4"
6'-6"1'-9 3/4"10'2'-2 1/4"14'6'-2"4'-4"2'-10 1/2"1
PAGE 10
2
PAGE 10
3
PAGE 10
4
Page 9
3
Page 9
2
Page 9
1
Page 9
235 sq ft
class: A3
(art gallery/lecture hall)
Occupancy Load factor 7 net
Occupancy Load: 33
4 8
2.
ALTERNATIVE 2 PLAN
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 9
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
4 8
EASTNORTH
WESTSOUTH
2.
ALTERNATIVE 2 ELEVATIONS
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPAGE 10
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
4 8
2.
ALTERNATIVE 2 SECTIONS
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 11
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
2.
ALTERNATIVE 2 PERSPECTIVE
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPage 12
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
2.
ALTERNATIVE 2 PERSPECTIVE
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPAGE 13
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
3.
ALTERNATIVE 3 SKETCH
www.harryteaguearchitects.com
970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comPAGE 14
HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS
3.
ALTERNATIVE 3 SKETCH
To: Town Council
From: Art in Public Places/Molly Eppard, AIPP Coordinator & Kara Woods, AIPP Chair
Date: 12/17/19
Subject: AIPP Program Information Update
I. Update on AIPP installations and programs during 2019 to present, as well as
upcoming summer 2020 projects.
The following will be highlighted during this AIPP presentation to Town Council:
10th Mountain Division Memorial restoration, Red Sandstone Elementary School Garage
public art, Summer public art murals, Ford Park Portals, Art Walks, Golf & Nordic
Clubhouse Interiors, High School Senior Internship, 13th Annual Vail Winterfest -
Holiday Lantern Walk, Ice & Light Installation, Summer 2019 programming, and Ford
Park Art Space.
Kelsey Montague Social Media Video: https://vimeo.com/375763060
Selected Recent AIPP Press:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/experience/2019/09/12/chihuly-museum-of-ice-
cream-wonderspaces-and-other-destination-art/2293996001/
https://www.9news.com/article/life/style/colorado-guide/colorado-artist-who-worked-
with-taylor-swift-paints-new-mural-in-vail/73-9157630b-c3f4-4f32-9b3f-8a2e010e6386
https://www.today.com/video/artist-kelsey-montague-dishes-on-her-interactive-street-
art-70983749783
https://hub.united.com/united-weekend-inspiration-vail-summer--2639209295.html
https://theknow.denverpost.com/2019/09/30/colorado-outdoor-art-installations/225073/
https://www.vailmag.com/articles/2019/6/7/four-colorado-artists-paint-the-town
Attachments: PDF of slideshow presentation.
PRESENTATION BY
Molly Eppard, AIPP Coordinator
Kara Woods, AIPP Board Chair
Art in Public Places
Program Update
Town of Vail Art in Public Places
Collection, Installations, and Programs
Spring/Summer 2019:
•10th Mountain Division Memorial
•RSES Garage Public Art
•Summer Public Art Murals
•Ford Park Portals Completion
•Art Walks
•Golf & Nordic Clubhouse
•High School Senior Internship
13th Annual Vail Winterfest:
•Lantern Making Workshops
•Holiday Lantern Walk
•Ice and Light Installation
Summer 2020:
•Installations & Programming
•Ford Park Art Space
•Stephen’s Park
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Aspening of Vail by John Fleming
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Seattle-based artist John Fleming’s Aspening
of Vail work was installed this Spring. The 18
steel blades represent an aspen grove flanking
a passageway west of the new parking garage.
The artist visited in late October 2018 for a
two-day workshop with Red Sandstone
Elementary 3rd grade students to incorporate
their words and renderings in the installation.
Summer Public Art Murals
Commissioned murals by renowned Colorado artists transformed public spaces in Vail Village &
Lionshead parking structures.
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
KELSEY MONTAGUE @kelseymontagueart
#whatliftsyou
Summer Public Art Murals
Commissioned murals by renowned Colorado artists transformed public spaces in Vail Village &
Lionshead parking structures.
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Pedro Barrios & Jaime Molina
@theworstcrew
Summer Public Art Murals
Commissioned murals by renowned Colorado artists transformed public spaces in Vail Village &
Lionshead parking structures.
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Informational signage for murals.
Summer Public Art Murals
Commissioned murals by renowned Colorado artists transformed public spaces in Vail Village &
Lionshead parking structures.
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Pat Milbery & So-Gnar Creative Division
@so_gnarcreativedivision
Completed Ford Park Portals by Andy Dufford and Chevo Studio
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Seven artistic wayfinding markers at pedestrian
entry points to Ford Park.
WEDNESDAY ART WALKS
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Average summer tour hosted 30 guests.
Golf and Nordic Clubhouse Interior Enhancements
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Photographic wall covering of Gore Range
by local photographer Brendan Caffrey.
Jerry R. Ford Invitational Golf Tournament (1977-1997)
Posters reproduced courtesy of Bill & Sally Hanlon.
Vail Mountain School Senior Project/Internship
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
13th Annual Vail Winterfest
Lantern Workshops, Holiday Lantern Walk, Ice and Light Installation
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
13th Annual Vail Winterfest Lantern Workshops, Holiday Lantern Walk
& Ice and Light Installation
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Lantern workshops with Alpine Arts Center,
partnering with Vail Public Library and VRD.
13th Annual Vail Winterfest
Lantern Workshops, Holiday Lantern Walk, Ice and Light Installation
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Holiday Lantern Walk in Vail Village
13th Annual Vail Winterfest Lantern Workshops, Holiday Lantern Walk
& Ice and Light Installation
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
New for Vail Winterfest 2019!
Lighting installation by Alt Ethos
Ice Sculptures by Alpine Ice
Summer 2020 Programs and Installations
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Stephen’s Park –Artistic Elements by Ben Roth
Anticipated installation Spring 2020.
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Ford Park Art Space Residency Space
Report and Evaluation by Harry Teague Architects
Town of Vail | Art in Public Places | artinvail.com
Thank you