Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 6, 2022 _Minutes Public Notice - Art in Public Places Board Meeting Minutes Monday, June 6, 2022 AIPP Board members present: Susanne Graf (zoom), Tracy Gordon, Kathy Langenwalter, Courtney St. John, Lindsea Stowe Others present: Molly Eppard, AIPP Coordinator, Kendall Peterson, Jill Stilwell, 1. Approval of May 2, 2022 meeting minutes. 2. No citizen input. 3. Kaitlin Ziesmer (zoom) - Update on mural proposals for Lionshead skatepark & exterior wall. • The Board compliments the direction Kaitlin has gone with the revisions introducing unexpected characters to the murals. They like the whimsy and contrast of these animals for the murals, as well as including both a profile and head-on image. They like the personality and color of the compositions. • Molly discusses flexibility in working on such a tight timeline (arrives June 23 – departs July 1) for the three murals with Kaitlin. Molly will look into the prep of the walls to expedite the process. Renderings for the skatepark murals: P3 Exterior wall (facing Children’s Garden of Learning) proposal: 4. Logan Collection sculpture installation update and landscape review • Middlebrook and Singletary installed on May 31. It went well with ShipArt and Intermountain Landscaping. • Mabry and Kahlhamer installation to take place on June 24. Molly viewed the works in Denver and is very pleased. • Thankyou reception for the Logans will take place in August. Date and location TBD. • Molly is working on the interpretive on plaques with content provided by Kent Logan. • The Board confirms the location for the Kahlhamer. The work needs to be oriented towards the west per the artist request. The Board thinks this will be a nice “nook” and discovery location for the work. • The Tully was located and set by the PW department. • LANDSCAPING DISCUSSION: • Molly presents the plans from the Landscaping department. They said they took the Board’s comments from the last meeting into consideration. The Board reviews the proposed plans and provides feedback for consideration: o Nathan Mabry site (VVTRC – West): The Board motions the following recommendations for this site: The Elijah Blue Fescue surrounding the sculpture is fine. The Board feels the low growing Waldbrunn Spruce does not flow with the existing plants and will break up the cohesion to the Lawrence Weiner. They would like to eliminate it from the plan. They would prefer to see the previously recommended roses versus the spirea, so the plants won’t all be round mounds and will give a little height to cover the back wall. o Preston Singletary (VVTRC – Central): The Board motions to remove the sod and simplify the plantings given the recommendation of the art conservator. He recommends eliminating the grass around the sculpture and look towards something that will not have the accumulation of caked-on grass on the surface of the sculpture and less maintenance. The Board would like to have a mutually agreed upon ground cover. The Landscape crew would like to install a subterranean wetting mat for irrigation. Kathy modifies the motion to include a landscape cloth to eliminate concerns for weeds. o Middlebrook (VVTRC – Central): Tracy is concerned about some of the proposed heights of the plantings, as the sculpture needs to be viewed in the round. They are proposing plants that will obstruct the view of the sculpture as the plants mature. Kathy suggests planting the proposed perennials and not invest too much money in the landscaping, rather to revisit it at the end of summer. The Board motions not to plant the shrubs, bushes, spruce behind the work and to rather fill with the perennials to the east of the sculpture for this season. The small Crabapple behind the lamppost does not look healthy and would like to see it removed. • The Board reiterates their priority is to see how the sculptures are presented year-round and the interaction with visitors. They prefer to wait on spending too much budget on the landscaping and revisit next Spring. It is the responsibility of the Board to provide recommendations for the sculpture sites including landscaping. 5. Coordinator Updates. • Summer brochure and ads are being designed. • Art Walks July 6 – August 31 • Bronze collection was cleaned last week. More attention had to be made on the Seibert Memorial Sculpture which was a concern. There are monies remaining in that fund which can be utilized towards maintaining the work. • Squire Broel to clean the Singletary Totem • Next steps with Chantelle Rytter. The Board would like Molly to ask about lantern kits and online instruction for this summer and look towards something bigger in 2024. • Ford Park Master Plan integration of Art Space • Next meetings: June 27, August 1, August 29, October 3, Nov 7, Dec 5 • Stakeholders for Strategic Plan interviews confirmed: Harry and Susan Frampton and Barry Davis. Suzanne Silverthorne. 6. Ford Park Art Space Programming Objectives • Molly updates the Board on the momentum and progress for the development of the Ford Park Art Space over the past several years including the design development from Harry Teague Architects and its inclusion in this year’s budget for construction. • Today the Board will discuss what the program will look like and how it benefits the community, the artists, the sustainability of programming, and the legacy of that program for Vail. In comparison to other mountain town with large arts campuses and residency programs, AIPP needs to differentiate the use of a small studio space to create a public art program that is unique to our community that will standout against other programs. Identify ways to elevate what Vail can offer with this program. • This is not a residency where an artist is interacting other artists, it is a more isolated retreat experience for an artist. It is a time to go inward versus outward. It is time for an artist to concentrate on their own process and rejuvenate. The Board likes the concept of a retreat and to move away from calling it a residency. • Lindsea comments on bridging the gap between artist and community to foster growth. The artist will be integrated into the community for inspiration. • Tracy comments on the considerations and expectations for the artists interaction. • Molly suggests identifying the program as one thing and the space as another. The “Vail Artist Retreat at the Ford Park Studio” may be a simple possibility. Kathy does not want to use Ford Park. Molly comments it is a way to look at the language of marketing and growth in the future. • Kathy asks of the Board what is unique about Vail beyond nature. Lindsea would like to focus on community integration for the artist and how that may shape Vail’s program differently. The town itself is the experience versus being totally removed and alleviates many urban pressures. Courtney comments that it would introspective and self-guided. Tracy comments that it is a time to inspire the artist in their process. The immediate surroundings would be inspirational. Ford Park is the host to numerous cultural events throughout the summer months. The location is catered to the pedestrian. • Molly outlines descriptions of retreats/residencies gives artists the opportunity to live and work outside of their usual environments, providing them with the time to reflect, research, or produce work…exploring new locations, different cultures and experiment with different materials. Artist retreats are breaks from life that allow craftspeople working in different media to experience a calming environment in which to create rewarding working within a community. • Each artist retreat will likely look different. Susanne comments on setting guidelines, but to give the artist a voice about what they would like to gain from the experience. • Molly discusses meetings with Squire Broel who is a master art conservator and artist who has had vast experience in residencies, retreats, and instruction. • The intimacy of this space is an open working studio. The Town has other facilities and assets where larger gatherings, talks, workshops can take place. • What does the buy-in and support from the community look like to augment the program? The Board needs to address what housing and associated costs might look like. • Lindsea comments on the possibility of community/business partnerships. Not only to alleviate some burdens of costs, but to integrate into the community fabric. She asks if there are events that can be allocated towards CSE funding with the educational components and experiences? • Kathy - Foster a studio in an environment where artists can retreat and reenergize. She comments that the program aligns with the established AIPP policies and guidelines. • Lindsea – Foster creative environment and professional growth through connection to community and natural landscape. • Tracy – Are there possibilities for an artist to donate a work for a possible auction with proceeds benefiting the artist’s retreat? • What does a stipend look like for associated costs for an artist retreat? Is this a potential for sponsorship and underwriting? • The Board would like to move forward with the design approval and the construction timeline. They would like to simplify some of the design elements now that the program is starting to be streamlined. Molly is instructed to meet with Greg Hall, John King and Matt Gennett to work on an efficient timeline for the process. • The Board agrees to make the program in the first few years an invitational process to identify what is working and what is not working in the program. • Objectives and Considerations for Programming: • WHY: We are in a position to set our program apart and offer a unique experience to artists, as well as bring fresh new perspectives to the valley. The scope of the programs will be mutually designed and agreed upon by the artist and staff. Typical public engagement consists of community projects, lectures, demonstrations, youth-learning experiences, workshops or other special programming. • WHAT: Providing a single artist or collective the opportunity to work in a focused manner in the studio space. Given the size and limitations of space, this opportunity will stand apart from other larger nearby arts campuses like BreckCreate, Anderson Ranch. • WHERE: Approximately 400 square feet the intimate studio space is set in Ford Park along the Gore Creek, the cultural epicenter of Vail. For some programming needs other assets within the Town of Vail may be suitable. • WHO: Emerging, mid-career, and established artists. Regional and National. All demographics. A variety of disciplines to be considered. • WHEN: Month long summer residency / retreat. There may be an option for other time options as the program develops. 7. Meeting adjourned.