Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB08-0191. u APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIGNED Project #: nz -�'� Building Permit #: Fk­ - 01 'A I TOWN ff OVARIL �" Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. , Vail, Colorado 81657 T WN IL I L PERMIT APPLICATION Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, etc.! CONTRACTOR INFORMATION General Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact Person a d Phone #'s: vim. 4� �b �� -2'j Email address: (\Ofax #: qrp Contractor Signature: ^ I COMPLETE VALUATIONS FO RU1LD PERMIT (Labor & Materials) BUILDING: $ v �u ELECTRICAL: $ t 75- OTHER: $ Owners Name: 7S 5� Address: ` C� P PLUMBING: $ Architect/Designer: J r .� MECHANICAL: $ s TOTAL: $ S p u J F or Parcel # Contact Eaale Countv Assessors Office at 970 - 328 -8640 or v isit www.eaale- countv.com Ra ' <'C - 0 _3> Z A Job Name: 4-J S 4,) /� J �\ �� '� V J Job Address: 2 1 S Legal Description L Lot: Block: C\ [ Filing: SubdivYs�io�: Owners Name: 7S 5� Address: ` C� P Phone: Architect/Designer: J r ress: Add ( J � a , �°� P Phone: 32� Engineer: _ A Address: u ,t j� P Phone: A Detailed description of work: Work Class: New (L/Addition ( ) Remodel ( ) Repair ( ) Demo ( ) Other ( ) Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior ( ) Both ( D Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes( ) No Type of Bldg.: Single- family ( ) Two - family ( Multi- family ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( ) No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: C > N No. of Accommodation Units in this building: No/Type of Fireplaces Existing: Gas A liances Gas Los Wood /Pellet Wood Burnin b No/Type of Fireplaces Proposed: Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood /Pellet Wood Burning NOT ALL Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No D Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes( ) No (-�— OFF ICE USE ONLY***` F: \c \P ildi uilding- t4ze'D L_ �J L`= L7 V JUN 0 5 2008 TOWN OF VAIL Page 1 of 7 04/17/20' TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement Statement Number: R080000884 Amount: $5,187.81 06/05/200803:08 PM Payment Method: Check Init: JLE Notation: 1020 RANCH CREEK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B08 -0191 Type: NEW (SFR,P /S,DUP) PERMIT Parcel No: 2103 - 143 - 0104 -0 Site Address: 2755 SNOWBERRY DR VAIL Location: 2755 SNOWBERRY DR Total Fees: $45,973.06 This Payment: $5,187.81 Total ALL Pmts: $5,187.81 Balance: $40,785.25 ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 5,187.81 A t Geotech June 30, 1999 Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970- 945 -8454 hpgeo @hpgeotech.com 0 Chip Webster H JUN 0 5 2008 9 Amelia Drive Nantucket, Massachusetts 02544 TOWN Q�rlll! Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 10, Block 9, Intermountain Subdivision, 2755 Snowberry Lane, Vail, Colorado. Dear Mr. Webster: As requested, Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated May 18, 1999. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Interim findings were reported to you in a letter dated May 24, 1999. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a walkout level and located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. Ground floor will be stab -on- grade. Cut depths are assumed to range between about 4 to 8 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re- evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site and Geologic Conditions: The proposed building site is located in the northeastern part of the lot below Snowberry Lane. The terrain is steep sloping generally down to the northwest. The lot lies within mapped geologic hazard areas by the Town of Vail. The mapped hazards consist of the potential for debris avalanche flow and rockfall. The debris avalanche potential appears limited to the relatively deep drainage in the western part of the lot outside the building area. The rockfall potential is mapped as medium severity and apparently limited to the upper part of the lot extending to the building area. Based on observation of the site conditions, we believe the rockfall potential risk is probably low and mitigation should not be needed. The lot Chip Webster June 30, 1999 Page 2 could also be susceptible to construction induced slope instability due to the steep natural slopes and very steep fill slope of Snowberry Lane. Cut and fill depths should be limited as discussed in then "Site Grading" section of this report. Vegetation consists of an aspen and evergreen mixed forest with grass and weed understory. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 1 /2 feet of topsoil, consist of clayey sand and gravel with cobbles in Pit I and clay and sand with gravel in Pit 2. The clayey sand and gravel was loose to medium dense and extended to the Pit 2 depth of 10 feet. The sand and clay was medium dense stiff and underlain by weathered siltstone /sandstone shale to the Pit 1 depth of 9 feet. Results of sweIl- consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the sand and clay soil from Pit 2, presented on Fig. 3, indicate low to moderate compressibility when loaded and wetted. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a bulk sample of sand and gravel from Pit 1 (minus 5 inch fraction) are presented on Fig. 4. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were moist to very moist with depth and the shale was moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil or weathered shale and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. The soils tend to compress when loaded and wetted and there could be some post - construction foundation settlement, especially at the transition from soil to shale bearing. The footings should bear at least 5 feet below the natural ground surface. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. All topsoil and loose disturbed materials encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils or weathered shale. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 48 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be well reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure H -P GEOTECH Chip Webster June 30, 1999 Page 3 based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on -site soil or well broken shale as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, and the weathered shale are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free - draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2 % passing the No. 200 sieve. r All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard. Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on -site soils and well broken shale devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area and where bedrock is shallow that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free - draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at- a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free - draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should beat least 1 /z feet deep. Site Grading: The risk of construction- induced slope instability at the site generally appears low provided the building is located in the less steep part of the lot as planned H -P GcorECH Chip Webster June 30, 1999 Page 4 and cut and dill depths are limited. Cuts that extend into the weathered shale could have a potential to fail on the bedding layers and fractures. We assume the cut depths for the basement level will not.exceed one level, about 8 to 10 feet. Fills should be limited to about 8 to 10 feet deep and not be placed on natural slopes steeper than 40 %. Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting , to 95 % standard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20% grade. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. The risk of slope instability will be increased if seepage is encountered in cuts and flatter slopes may be necessary. If seepage is encountered in permanent cuts, an investigation should be conducted to determine if the seepage will adversely affect the cut stability. We should observe the building excavations to evaluate slope stability conditions. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free - draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no H -P GEOTECH Chip Webster June 30, 1999 Page 5 warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - so0 ` RE e =-° : (,2 -216 David A. Young, P.E. . �•�v.� .7 -ZA .• `�. Reviewed By: ��1111i III0 Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. DAY /ksm attachments C. H -P GEOTECH APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 4-0' 70 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT / 60 I / ( / 50 I 30 t LLJ w + I PIT 2/ I J t 1 I a / / PROPOSED , t RESIDENCE t I / LOT 10 20 PIT 1 / PROPOSED PARKING i / 80 30 70 / / /yii- 20 50 40 LOT 11 ` LOT 12 �/p 199 404 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 1 GEOTECHNICAL, INC_ TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, gravelly, organic, very moist, black. SAND AND CLAY (SC —CL); gravelly, scattered cobbles, medium dense /stiff, moist, brown. GRAVEL AND SAND (GC —SC); clayey, with cobbles and small boulders, loose to medium dense with depth, moist to very moist, brown. SILTSTONE /SANDSTONE; weatherd to medium hard, moist, gray — brown. Minturn Formation. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. � Disturbed bulk sample. .J NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on May 19, 1999 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of the exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree Implied by the method used. S. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DG = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 199 404 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. PIT 1 PIT 2 ELEV. = 78' ELEV. = 72' 0 0 s Q. SI wc=18.3 4-1 0 ° •' 00 -102 � m U- ;i% - 200-48 � ,. _ _ 5 +4=43 $ - 200-10 s .• a• _ J ; ;� ' WC--26.7 ' m O ' DD-105 4 10 10 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, gravelly, organic, very moist, black. SAND AND CLAY (SC —CL); gravelly, scattered cobbles, medium dense /stiff, moist, brown. GRAVEL AND SAND (GC —SC); clayey, with cobbles and small boulders, loose to medium dense with depth, moist to very moist, brown. SILTSTONE /SANDSTONE; weatherd to medium hard, moist, gray — brown. Minturn Formation. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. � Disturbed bulk sample. .J NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on May 19, 1999 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of the exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree Implied by the method used. S. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DG = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 199 404 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 0 1 2 3 C 0 a 4 a E v 5 6 7 •, c O N P 2 P CL E 0 U 3 4 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf HEPWORTH - PAWLAK SWELL- CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 8 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 18.3 percent Dry Density = 102 pcf Sample of: Sand and Clay From: Pit 2 at 2 Feet Compression upon wetting 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 0.1 199 404 Moisture Content = 26.7 percent Dry Density = 105 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 2 at 5.5 Feet No movemen Upon wettin g 0.1 199 404 08/05/2002 00:13 FAX 5082283630 CWA ARCHITECTS 0010/010 z m c M 0 D O �" D D D -I m G) 0 < 0 "q rn m -S z z m c D z n O a) 2 O O ^ T a 3 Ul O N - _ o _o n W . O Ul O N y $ L y r w p a m I p a e V o Op D 2 0 Q Z m C C _ y A m o Z m o p z r m m = r 3 x � A C O 3 0 r 2 m ? w m _ : o m U) d (n N cn CD r ✓ � ` L1 n n w m y N � D CD O a y � � m d d Q 0010/010 z m c M 0 D O �" D D D -I m G) 0 < 0 "q rn m -S z z m c D z n O a) 2 O O ^ T CNJ REScheck Software Version 4.0.1 Compliance Certificat Project Title: Hilb Duplex - House A w Report Date: 06/04/08 53 Data filename: C:1Program Files%CheddREScheddhilb10 house A.rck Energy Code: 2003 IECC 256 Location: Vail, Colorado 1035 Construction Type: Single Family Door 1: Solid: Glazing Area Percentage: 23% 0.500 105 Heating Degree Days: 9248 380 Construction Site: Owner/Agent- LOT 10, VAIL INBTERMTN BLOCK 1 Dave Hilb 2755 SNOWBERRY DRIVE Ranch Creek Development VAIL, CO 81657 1465 Aspen Grove Lame Vail, CO 81657 Insulation depth: 10.8' 970 - 376 -2742 d.hilb @comcast.net JUN 05 2008 TOWN OF VAIL Designer/Contractor: John Martin John G Martin, Architect, LLC PO Box 4701 Eagle, CO 81631 970 - 328-0592 john.martin @centurytel.net Ceiling 1: Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss: 2917 0.0 $3.0 53 Wall 1: Wood Frame, 16' o.c.: 6110 21.0 0.0 256 Window 1: Wood Frame:Double Pare with Low -E: 1035 0.400 414 Door 1: Solid: 209 0.500 105 Door 2: Glass: 380 0.550 209 Basement Wall 1: Solid Concrete or Masonry: 1319 0.0 14.0 54 Wall height: 10.8' Depth below grade: 10.8' Insulation depth: 10.8' Floor 1: AA -Wood Jo Truss:Over Outside Air. 297 38.0 0.0 8 Floor 2: Slab -On- Grade :Heated: 272 14.0 179 Insulation depth: 4.V Furnace 1: Forced Hot Air: 97 AFUE Boiler 1: Gas -Fired Steam: 97 AFUE Compliance Statement: The proposed butting design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other caladations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2003 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 4.0.1 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. . _ O#0 6 . kA 2T1 nJ ,02c i+t - tom T �- � -�� -._ (' - �l ' U C 6 Name - Title nature Date Hilb Duplex - House A Page 1 of 4 Compliance: Passes Maximum UA: 1294 Your Home UA: 1278 - -> 1.2% Better Than Code (UA) CNJ Date: 06/04/08 Ceilings: REScheck Software Version 4.0.1 Inspection Checklist ❑ Ceiling 1: Flat Ceiling or Scissor Truss, R -53.0 continuous insulation Comments: Above -Grade Walls: ❑ Wall 1: Wood Frame, 16" o.c., R -21.0 cavity insulation Comments: Basement Walls: ❑ Basement Wall 1: Solid Concrete or Masonry, 10.8' ht / 10.8' bg / 10.8' insul, R -14.0 continuous insulation Comments: Exterior insulation has a rigid, opaque, weather - resistant protective covering that covers the exposed (above - grade) insulation and extends at least 6 in. below grade. Windows: ❑ Window 1: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E, U- factor. 0.400 For windows without labeled U- factors, describe features: #Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No Comments: Doors: ❑ Door 1: Solid, U- factor. 0.500 Comments: ❑ Door 2: Glass, U- factor: 0.550 Comments: Floors: ❑ Floor 1: All -Wood Joist/Truss:Over Outside Air, R -38.0 cavity insulation Comments: ❑ Floor 2: Slab- On- Grade:Heated, 4.0' insulation depth, R -14.0 continuous insulation Comments: Slab insulation extends down from the top of the slab to at least 4.0 ft. OR dawn to at least the bottom of the slab then horizontally for a total distance of 4.0 ft. Exterior insulation has a rigid, opaque, weather - resistant protective covering that covers the exposed (above - grade) insulation and 0 extends at least 6 in. below grade. Heating and Cooling Equipment. ❑ Furnace 1: Forced Hot Air: 97 AFUE or higher Make and Model Number. ❑ Baler 1: Gas -Fired Steam: 97 AFUE or higher Make and Model Number. Air Lealugp: ❑ Joints, penetrations, and all other such openings in the building envelope that are sources of air leakage are sealed. ❑ Recessed lights are 1) Type IC rates, or 2) installed inside an appropriate air -tight assembly with a 0.5" clearance from combustible materials. If non-IC rated, fixtures are installed with a 3" clearance from insulation. Hilb Duplex - House A Page 2 of 4 Skylights: ❑ Minimum insulation requirement for skylight shafts equal to or greater than 12 inches is R -19. Vapor Retarder: ❑ Installed on the warm4n- winter side of all non - vented framed ceilings, walls, and floors. Materials Identification: ❑ Materials and equipment are installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. ❑ Materials and equipment are identified so that compliance can be determined. ❑ Manufacturer manuals for all installed heating and cooling equipment and service water heating equipment have been provided. ❑ Insulation R- values, glazing 1.1-factors, and heating equipment efficiency are dearly marked on the building plans or specifications. ❑ Insulation is installed according to manufacturers instructions, in substantial contact with the surface being insulated, and in a mmrmer that achieves the rated R -value without compressing the insulation. Duct Insulation: ❑ Supply duds in unconditioned attics or outside the buikkng are insulated to R -11. ❑ Return duds in unconditioned attics or outside the building are insulated to R-6. ❑ Supply duds in unconditioned spaces are insulated to R -11. ❑ Return duds in unconditioned spaces (except basements) are insulated to R -2. Insulation is not required on retum duds in basements. ❑ Where exterior wags are used as plenums, the wail is insulated to R -11. Duct Construction: ❑ Dud connections to flanges of air distribution system equipment are sealed and mechanically fastened. ❑ AN joints, seams, and connections are securely fastened with welds, gaskets, mastics (adhesives), mastic -plus- embedded- fabric, or tapes. Tapes and mastics are rated UL 181A or UL 181 B. Exceptions Continuously welded and locking-type kxhgitudinal joints and seams on duds operating at less than 2 in. w.g. (500 Pa). ❑ The HVAC system provides a means for balancing air and water systems. Temperature Controls: ❑ Thermostats exist for each separate HVAC system. A manual or automatic means to partially restrict or shut off the heating and/or cooling input to each zone or floor is provided. Service Water Heating: ❑ Water theaters with vertical pipe risers have a heat trap on both the inlet and outlet unless the water heater has an integral heat trap or is part of a circulating system. ❑ Circulating hot water pipes are insulated to the levels in Table 1. Circulating Hot Water Systems: ❑ Circulating hot water pipes are insulated to the levels in Table 1. Swimming Pools: ❑ All heated swimming pods have an on/off heater switch and a cover unless over 20% of the heating energy is from non-depletable sources. Pool pumps have a time cock. Heating and Cooling Piping Insulation: ❑ HVAC piping conveying fluids above 105 degrees F or chilled fluids below 55 degrees F are insulated to the levels in Table 2. k Hilb Duplex - House A Page 3 of 4 Table 1: Minimum Insulation Thickness for Circulating Hot Water Pipes Table 2: Minimum Insulation Thickness for HVAC Pipes Fluid Tend Insulation Thickness in Inches by Pipe Saes Insulation Thickness in Inches by Pipe Sizes Non -Circulating Runouts Circulating Mains and Runouts Heated Water Temperature ( "F) Up to 1" Up to 1.25" 1.5" to 2.0" Over 2" 170 -180 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 140 -169 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 100 -139 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 Table 2: Minimum Insulation Thickness for HVAC Pipes NOTES TO FIELD: (Building Department Use Only) r a Hilb Duplex - House A Page 4 of 4 Fluid Tend Insulation Thickness in Inches by Pipe Sizes POW Sys Types Ram( F) 2" Runouts 1" and Less 1.25" to 2.0" 2.5" to 4" Heating Systems Low Pressure/Temperature 201 -250 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 Low Temperature 106 -200 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 Steam Condensate (for feed water) Any 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 Cooling Systems Chilled Water, Refrigerant and 40-55 0.5 0.5 0.75 1.0 Brine Below 40 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 NOTES TO FIELD: (Building Department Use Only) r a Hilb Duplex - House A Page 4 of 4 Irl REScheck Software Version 4.0.1 Compliance Certificate Project Title: Hilb Duplex - House B Report Date: 06J04108 Data filename: C:1Program F iles % Check RESchecklhilbl0 house B.rck Energy Code: 2003 IECC Location: Vail, Colorado Construction Type: Side Family Glazing Area Percentage: 20% Heating Degree Days: 9248 Construction Site: Lot 10, Val lntemmtn Block 1 2755 Snowberry Drive Vail, CO 81657 Owner /Agent: Dave Hilb Ranch Creek Development 1465 Aspen Grove Lane Vail, CO 81657 970 - 376 -2742 d.hilb @comcast.net Designer /Contractor. John Martin John G Martin, Architect, LLC PO Box 4701 Eagle, CO 81631 970 - 328-0592 john.martin @centurytel.net Ceiling 1: Cathedral Ceiling (no attic): 2197 0.0 53.0 40 Wall 1: Wood Frame, 16" o.c.: 5058 21.0 0.0 219 Window 1: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Law -E: 788 0.400 315 Door 1: Solid: 206 0.500 103 Door 2: Glass: 224 0.550 123 Basement Wall 1: Solid Concrete or Masonry: 1213 0.0 10.0 59 Wall height: 10.8' Depth below grade: 10.8' Insulation depth: 10.8' Floor 1: All-Wood JoisUfruss:Over Outside Air. 258 38.0 0.0 7 Floor 2: Slab-0n- Grade:Heated: 217 14.0 143 Insulation depth: 4.0' Furnace 1: Forced Hot Air. 95 AFUE Boiler 1: Gas -Fired Steam: 95 AFUE Compliance Statement The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2003 IECC requirements in REScheck Version 4.0.1 and to comply with the mandatory requirements fisted in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. Ma rne - Title , -�� Signature Date Hilb Duplex - House B Page 1 of 4 Compliance: Passes Maximum UA: 1038 Your Home UA: 1009 - -> 2.8% Better Than Code (UA CNMJ Date: 06 /04/08 Ceilings: REScheck Software Version 4.0.1 Inspection Checklist ❑ Ceiling 1: Cathedral Ceiling (no attic), R-53.0 continuous insulation Comments: Above -Grade Walls: ❑ Wall 1: Wood Frame, 16" o.c., R -21.0 cavity insulation Comments: Basement Walls: Exterior insulation has a rigid, opaque, weather - resistant protective covering that covers the exposed (above-grade) insulation and extends at least 6 in. below grade. ❑ Basement Wall 1: Solid Concrete or Masonry, 10.8' ht / 10.8' bg / 10.8' insul, R -10.0 continuous insulation Comments: Windows: ❑ Window 1: Wood Frame :Double Pane with Low -E, U- factor. 0.400 For windows without labeled U- factors, describe features: #Panes Frame Type Thermal Break? Yes No Comments: Doors: ❑ Door 1: Solid, U- factor: 0.500 Comments: ❑ Door 2: Glass, U- factor 0.550 Comments: Floors: ❑ Floor 1: All -Wood Joist/Truss:Over Outside Air, R-38.0 cavity insulation Comments: ❑ Floor 2: Slab -On -Grade :Heated, 4.0' insulation depth, R -14.0 continuous insulation Comments: Slab insulation extends down from the top of the slab to at least 4.0 ft. OR down to at least the bottom of the slab then horizontally for a total distance of 4.0 ft. Exterior insulation has a rigid, opaque, weather - resistant protective covering that covers the exposed (above - grade) insulation and extends at least 6 in. below grade. Heating and Cooling Equipment: ❑ Furnace 1: Forced Hot Air. 95 AFUE or higher Make and Model Number. ❑ Baler 1: Gas -Fred Steam: 95 AFUE or higher Make and Model Number: Air Leakage: ❑ Joints, penetrations, and all other such openings in the building envelope that are sources of air leakage are sealed. ❑ Recessed lights are 1) Type IC rated, or 2) installed inside an appropriate air -tight assembly with a 0.5" clearance from combustible materials. If non4C rated, foctures are installed with a 3' clearance from insulation. Hilb Duplex - House B Page 2 of 4 Skylights: ❑ Minimum insulation requirement for skylight shafts equal to or greater than 12 inches is R -19. Vapor Retarder: ❑ Installed on the warm4n- winter side of all non - vented framed ceilings, walls, and floors. Materials Identification: ❑ Materials and equipment are installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions. ❑ Materials and equipment are identified so that compliance can be determined. ❑ Manufacturer manuals for all installed heating and coding equipment and service water heating equipment have been provided. ❑ Insulation R- values, glazing U- factors, and heating equipment efficiency are dearly marked on the building plans or specifications. ❑ Insulation is installed according to manufacturers instructions, in substantial contact with the surface being insulated, and in a manner that achieves the rated R -value without compressing the insulation. Duct Insulation: ❑ Supply duds in unconditioned attics or outside the building are insulated to R -11. ❑ Return ducts in unconditioned attics or outside the building are insulated to R-6. ❑ Supply duds in unconditioned spaces are insulated to R -11. ❑ Return duds in unconditioned spaces (except basements) are insulated to R -2. Insulation is not required on return duds in basements. ❑ Where exterior walls are used as plenums, the wall is insulated to R -11. Duct Construction: ❑ Dud connections to flanges of air distribution system equipment are sealed and mechanically fastened. ❑ AN joints, seams, and connections are securely fastened with welds, gaskets, mastics (adhesives), mastic- plus-embedded- fabric, or tapes. Tapes and mastics are rated UL 181A or UL 181 B. Exceptions: Continuously welded and locking-type longitudinal joints and seams on duds operating at less than 2 in. w.g. (500 Pa). ❑ The HVAC system provides a means for balancing air and water systems. Temperature Controls: ❑ Thermostats exist for each separate HVAC system. A manual or automatic means to partially restrict or shut off the heating and/or cooling input to each zone or floor is provided. Service Water Heating: ❑ Water heaters with vertical pipe risers have a heat trap on both the inlet and outlet unless the water heater has an integral heat trap or is part of a circulating system. ❑ Circulating hot water pipes are insulated to the levels in Table 1. Circulating Hot Water Systems: ❑ Circulating hot water pipes are insulated to the levels in Table 1. Swimming Pools: ❑ All heated swimming pods have an on/off heater switch and a cover unless over 20% of the heating energy is from non- depletable sources. Pod pumps have a time dock. Heating and Cooling Piping Insulation: ❑ HVAC piping conveying fluids above 105 degrees F or chilled fluids below 55 degrees F are insulated to the levels in Table 2. Hilb Duplex - House B Page 3 of 4 Table 1: Minimum Insulation Thickness for Circulating Hot Water Pipes Table 2. Minimum Insulation Thickness for HVAC Pipes Fluid Temp. Insulation Thickness in Inches by Pipe Sizes Insulation Thickness in Inches by Pipe Sizes Non - Circulating Runouts Circulating Mains and Runouts Heated Water Terre ( °F) Up to 1" Up to 1.25" 1.5" to 2.0" Over 2" 170 -180 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 140 -169 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 100 -139 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 Table 2. Minimum Insulation Thickness for HVAC Pipes NOTES TO FIELD: (Building Department Use Only) Hilb Duplex - House B Page 4 of 4 Fluid Temp. Insulation Thickness in Inches by Pipe Sizes Piping System Types Rangeff 2" Runouts 1" and less 1.25" to 2.0" 2.5" to 4" Heating Systems Low Pressurefremperature 201 -250 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 Low Temperature 106 -200 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 Steam Condensate (for feed water) Any 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 Cooling Systems Chilled Water, Refrigerant and 40-55 0.5 0.5 0.75 1.0 Brine Below 40 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 NOTES TO FIELD: (Building Department Use Only) Hilb Duplex - House B Page 4 of 4 Page 1 of 2 Casement Glazing Performance Product Type of Glazing Meets U.S. E Fa for SHGC VLT. % STAR a in F Showr Designer Series VENT WITH DOUBLE -PANE GLAZING Clad 2.5 mm clear with 2.5 mm clear HGP 3 mm SolarETm with 3 mm clear HGP 0.40 3 mm clear with 3 mm Gear HGP 0.49 3 mm Gear with 3 mm Low -E HGP 0.40 3 mm bronze with 3 mm clear HGP 0.49 3 mm bronze with 3 mm Low -E HGP 0.40 3 mm gray with 3 mm clear HGP 0.49 3 mm gray with 3 mm Low -E HGP 0.40 3 mm green with 3 mm Gear HGP 0.49 3 mm green with 3 mm Low -E HGP 0.40 VENT WITH TRIPLE -PANE GLAZING 0.50 0.47 0.31 0.49 0.46 0.40 0.37 0.37 0.34 0.33 0.29 51 47 34 51 46 38 35 34 31 43 40 N NC S 5/8" clear with 3 mm clear HGP 5/8" clear with 3 mm Low -E HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with argon with 2.5 mm clear HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with argon with 3 mm Low -E HGP 5/8" Low -E HA IG with 3 mm clear HGP 5/8" Low -E HA IG with 4 mm Gear HGP 5/8" Low -E HA IG with 3 mm Low -E HGP 5/8" Low -E HA IG with 4 mm Low -E HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm bronze /2.5 mm clear HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm bronze /3 mm clear HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm bronze /3 mm Low -E HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm bronze /4 mm Low -E HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm gray/ 2.5 mm clear HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm gray /3 mm clear HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm gray /3 mm Low -E HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm gray /4 mm Low -E HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm green /2.5 mm clear HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm green /3 mm clear HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm green /3 mm Low -E HGP 5/8" Low -E IG with 5 mm green /4 mm Low -E HGP 6 mm Low -E laminated IG /3 mm Low -E HGP 6 mm Low -E laminated IG /4 mm Low -E HGP FIXED WITH DOUBLE -PANE GLAZING 0.37 0.33 0.29 0.27 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.28 0.33 0.33 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.33 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.33 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.33 0.45 0.41 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.23 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.38 0.38 47 43 42 38 41 41 38 38 27 27 25 24 23 23 21 21 36 35 33 32 42 42 3 mm Gear with 3 mm clear HGP 3 mm Gear with 3 mm Low -E HGP 3 mm SolarETm with 3 mm clear HGP 3 mm bronze with 3 mm clear HGP 3 mm bronze with 3 mm Low -E HGP 3 mm gray with 3 mm clear HGP 3 mm gray with 3 mm Low -E HGP 3 mm green with 3 mm Gear HGP 3 mm green with 3 mm Low -E HGP FIXED WITH TRIPLE -PANE GLAZING 0.49 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.39 0.49 0.39 0.49 0.39 0.58 0.55 0.37 0.48 0.44 0.45 0.40 0.39 0.35 61 56 41 46 43 41 38 52 48 5/8" clear with 3 mm clear HGP 0.35 0.53 57 mhtml: http:// Pellaadm .comluserdocsldocuments /CM DSCGP.mht!CM DSCGP files /sheet... 6/4/2008 Glazing Defaults Glazing Defaults Page 1 of 4 The following tables provide default U- factors and SHGC values for glazing and doors based on the glazing or door features. The U- factors and SHGC values in these tables can be used in the absence of NFRC - labeled values. Glazing and doors cannot receive credit for features that cannot be clearly detected, such as argon gas fills and low - emissivity (low -E) coatings. Windows with these features may achieve much lower U- factors than those listed in Table 1. For example, a double -pane wood or vinyl window with low -E glass may have a 1.1-factor around 0.38. The same window with argon gas may be rated at 0.34. Therefore, it may be advantageous to use NFRC -rated test U- factors for these types of windows. Where a composite of materials from two different product types is used, the window or door must be assigned the higher U- factor. 2006 IECC: Table 1. U- Factor Default Table for Glazed Fenestration 2006 IECC: Table 2. Default Door U- Factors Door Type U- Factor Uninsulated Metal Skylight Frame Type Single Pane Double Pane Single Double Metal 1.20 0.80 2.00 1.30 Metal with Thermal Break 1.10 0.65 1.90 1.10 Nonmetal or Metal Clad 0.95 0.55 1.75 1.05 Glazed Block 0.60 2006 IECC: Table 2. Default Door U- Factors Door Type U- Factor Uninsulated Metal 1.20 Insulated Metal 0.60 Wood 7 G, Insulated, nonmetal edge, max 45% glazing, any glazing double pane 0.35 2006 IECC: Table 3. SHGC Values for Glazed Fenestration Glazing Defaults Page 2 of 4 SINGLE GLAZED DOUBLE GLAZED GLAZED BLOCK Clear Tinted Clear Tinted 0.8 0.7 1 0.7 0.6 0.6 Table 1. U- Factor Default Table for Windows, Glazed Doors, and Skylights Frame Material and Product Single Glazed Double Glazed Type (a) Metal Without Thermal Break Operable (incl. sliding and 1.27 0.87 swinging glass doors) 1.13 0.69 Fixed 2.60 1.81 Garden window 1.22 0.79 Curtain wall 1.98 1.31 Skylight 1.36 0.82 Site - assembled sloped /overhead glazing Metal With Thermal Break 0.65 Operable (incl. sliding and 1.08 swinging glass doors) 1.07 0.63 Fixed 1.11 0.68 Curtain wall 1.89 1.11 Skylight 1.25 0.70 Site - assembled sloped /overhead glazing Reinforced Vinyl /Metal -Clad Wood Operable (incl. sliding and 0.90 0.57 swinging glass doors) 0.98 0.56 Fixed 1.75 1.05 Skylight WoodNinyl /Fiberglass 0.55 Operable (incl. sliding and 0.89 swinging glass doors) 0.98 6 Fixed 2.31 1.61 Garden window 1.47 0.84 Skylight Glass Block Assemblies 0.60 Table 2. U- Factors for Non - Glazed Doors mk • nMSTTStore: C:\ Program% 20Files \Check\REScheck\HTMLHelp \appendixb.chm:: /Gla... 6/4/2008 Page 1 of 2 John G Martin From: Jeff Manley (jpmanley@centurytel.net] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:55 PM To: john.martin@Centurytel.net; 'Mountain CAD Services' Subject: FW. insulation for walls Roof insulation options: 2X12 joist with 6" (max thickness) spray foam = R 38.4+ R 19 bait = R 57.4 ( +/- because there will be some compression of batts) Note: spray foam does require that all sprinkler piping be copper. 2X12 joists with blown -in batt insulation = R48 (no copper piping required) can increase with foam insul on top 12 3/8" sips panel for the roof will have an R- Value =R -53.2. From: Jeff Manley [ mailto:jpmanley @centurytel.net] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:36 AM To: 'john.martin@centurytel.net'; 'Mountain CAD Services' Subject: insulation for walls John and Rob, A 12 3/8" sips panel for the roof will have an R- Value =R -53.2. You would typically use a open cell foam in the walls when using SIP. The R -Value would be R 3.7per inch X5.5" which is typically called out as R -21. A Cellulose wall will be R -21 with about 1/3 the cost, but not the tightness of 'open cell spray foam'. Another option is Spider by John Mansfield, which is R 4.2 per inch X5.5" = R23.1. This product is 5% more than c still a lot less than spray foam. Closed Cell Foam Property In Place Density R -Value K -Value Permeance Shear Strength Noise Reduction Sound Transmission Flame Spread Smoke Development Test ASTM D -1622 ASTM C- 518-02 ASTM C -518-02 ASTM E96 ASTM C -273 ASTM C423 ASTM E90- 85IE413 ASTM E- 84-77A Tunnel ASTM E- 84-77A Tunnel Value 1.9 LBS per cubic foo 7.1 per inch 0.284 0.88 @ 2.25 inches 30 psi (*10) 0.2 43 Class I: >25, Class II: Class I: >450, Class II Open Cell Foam 6/4/2008 Thank you, Jeffrey P Manley AIA (970)328 -1299 (970)328 -1273 fax (970)688 -0326 cell 6/4/2008 Page 2 of 2 Property Test Value In Place Density ASTM D -1622 0.5 LBS per cubic foo R -Value ASTM C- 518-02 3.7 per inch K -Value ASTM C -518-02 0.149 Permeance ASTM E96 16.42 Shear Strength ASTM C -273 1.9 psi Noise Reduction ASTM C423 0.7 Sound Transmission ASTM E90- 85/E413 51 Flame Spread ASTM E- 84-77A Tunnel Class 1: >25, Class 11: Smoke Development ASTM E- 84-77A Tunnel Class 1: >450, Class If Thank you, Jeffrey P Manley AIA (970)328 -1299 (970)328 -1273 fax (970)688 -0326 cell 6/4/2008 m iv O A New Custom Duplex for. John G. Martin, Arehiteet, LLC Conultants: m �r- N(n m �D � cn �r g y i K -n o0 N) " m Z N � m c8surytd Aet CT 'n N c O D 6 0 U) -n I�- m m - n 0 O� m �0 D m m ° O D r 6 O E Cl) °° - n O > -� N D b m C� D r C) C r D No N O Z r m O C m D �J U U ± X X N t XX N x x u a u h! t U N 0 m z m X O O n O m K C - v r m X Sheet NuaW A New Custom Duplex for. John G. Martin, Arehiteet, LLC Conultants: Revisions: tm Date: RC -1 Dave Hilb Lot 10, Vail Intermountain, Block 1 2755 kowbe Drive V4 Colorado P.O.Boam Phone: 91328$592 F ,CoRCi Fm 9>�32 PERMR:06 -05 -08 m c8surytd Aet t77 www . .... . . . . . ....... ....... - ------------ - - - - - - - - - - --- : 1 4 I wk ................. ----------- NX o** *4 4: .............. II .............. ........... J. 0 I , . .... ; �� 0 2 i _ • I Shed Number I A New Custom Duplex for. �I -_ 5 0" e. ♦ ♦ I ---- ---------- ;Sel N* t4 i! 14 rZ ... ....... p 'M WVM MMCDCDM z w M M r 9 > M i.. bo X Z LA I-PR. 52 M T �� Ln M ON F-M ENN 11,110 lina I I �_�°�_. � c , M-1 gg I 7.7 ■ 0 I , . .... ; �� 0 2 i _ • I Shed Number I A New Custom Duplex for. �I -_ 5 0" e. ♦ ♦ I ---- ---------- ;Sel N* t4 i! 14 rZ ... ....... p 'M WVM MMCDCDM z w M M r 9 > M i.. bo X Z LA I-PR. 52 M T �� Ln M ON F-M ENN 11,110 lina I I �_�°�_. � c , M-1 gg I n D r C7 C r N 0 Z r rn D 0 C U) m PC) tO W m�0 --j D RevWm: --4 C/) for- m P.O.B vil Fm- 97932&8592 E*6 UO F= 979328 8593 r ��ch o upm wZ �—„im -n CO p —1 / u W C/) O 1 N 6 r 88 > / �mI- 1Gn Cl) w �m O n s N O °° 8 --� m p m -n -n -n- D N m N — I 3 O a !O r -n N D IV m D p rn 00 0 U CQ P-n o 0 -nX � D ND „ r N RR N � O A �- cn � n = �� m 0 n D r C7 C r N 0 Z r rn D 0 C U) m PC) tO N 0 m m Z m X O O n 0 u m r -I r Fn X A New Custom Duplex for. John G. Martin, ArcWkct LLC ,' -5r RevWm: isme Date: — x tt P.O.B vil Fm- 97932&8592 E*6 UO F= 979328 8593 U La PERMIT: 06 -05-08 X — x N N a b /- N U t P � bi N RR N � O A Y n N 0 m m Z m X O O n 0 u m r -I r Fn X I A New Custom Duplex for. John G. Martin, ArcWkct LLC Comakants: RevWm: isme Date: 7 Dave Hilb Lot 10, Vail Intermountain, Block 1 nSS Snowbe Drive Vail Colorado P.O.B vil Fm- 97932&8592 E*6 UO F= 979328 8593 PERMIT: 06 -05-08 I ■ i �L_ -Fill 1 ♦ •1.11,♦ 1 ❖. ❖. �. /.. ❖. ❖.: 11,11 1 1.11 .�.. ♦' .1..1.1.1.1. 11,1 � Ij •. ire MIN ire !1.1.1•, •♦ 0 ♦ ♦•, ♦•O ♦•♦•a •, • • • 0•, •OOi 0 '' •Oi '. I .�ii•Oiiiiii �'•'•' "` "`'' -•' ri/ •♦11♦ /♦ ♦w♦.•••♦♦•♦• .. 111 1••1 1• - . /♦•♦♦♦♦•♦♦•♦ / ♦••1♦ 11 - •♦♦♦♦ew♦♦♦1 1 11 1 ♦/ : ,� 1 ♦ 1 / � ♦ 1 1 . 111 ♦ ♦ .. / ... • ♦� ���� �� 1 ` ' 11 � 11 ♦11♦ 1♦ • ♦�♦ 1':: / ♦111♦ ♦• ♦ ♦♦ 1 i •. � •� ♦ _ • 1. • I,/ • .. ♦ .; 111 1 •• ♦ ♦ r _ .: ♦/ ♦ ♦,1 •, r 1 1 � 11 - 1/., I� 1 ♦1 ♦1 •/ ; r� ♦ x• ♦ / • 1 III - _ /♦ 1 1 / . :: ` � H 1 1 • • �♦ • 1.1 ♦ ♦ ♦� ♦ ♦� ♦1. ♦11 ♦ . 1 ♦1 ♦1 ♦ ♦1• ♦1� :% :�i i p♦ 1 11 ♦:: i i i I N • 10 .. 1 �i Oi : /• �, 1 1 1 1 11 riii • iiii 1 •1111♦ a Hll -• ♦ ♦1� ♦ ♦ ♦♦ - t1 1 ♦• ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦/ -1 •1111♦ �.11 - ♦ •♦♦01111. ♦1 ♦•1 1 /1 -t ♦111 ♦ ♦t ♦. •.. ♦1• ♦1• ♦t ♦1 •1111• ♦1 ..• -t ♦11 'I `� t• ♦1 ♦• ♦♦ ♦1 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦1 ♦• 1 ♦: ♦ _ •�i1i1 � ♦���1♦1y1 1• ♦ ♦❖ • f 1 ♦ ♦ 1 i I • - . 1�♦ ♦ � / � / a 1 � / � 1 � / � / � / �� , •♦♦/ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦t• ♦ ♦♦ /1 - ♦1♦ .. ♦• •♦♦.♦111• t 1 ♦ ♦ ♦1 �1��� - • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦•1♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ 1 :, ♦ ♦ • ♦ / � ii/ 1 / ♦ ♦ ♦ / ♦ w♦ 1 I : ♦ ♦ 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 1 ♦ 111 ♦� :�..::::..::::::.. Vy'.:...:....:- - ♦ 1111 - 111 ♦ ♦� ♦� ♦ ♦ ♦ �1 ♦ ♦ x ♦ ♦� u ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 1 /•♦ 1 1 1 1 1 ♦ / :, �', � ♦ ♦ ♦ �� / � • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ / � • ':. • ♦ ❖':. - :' +•iii'iiiii / ♦•1•iiiiiiii 1 i III • _ . ri / ♦' • ii • "� . � , i!1�♦♦11♦1. .!♦♦♦111♦♦ / •. , - •.• • ii• �iiiiii r i ♦•iiiiiiii 1 a I - - Pi / . •ii• ♦ 1 t 11 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ � ♦1 1 1 III 1 • 1 • ♦ .' ♦' ♦ ♦ 1 1 1 i � 1 ♦ / ♦ / ♦ 1 . -• I 1 :. ,1 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • . / ,♦ 1� 11,1 I ♦ ♦ 1 i • r / 11 • 1 1 1 ♦ / ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 1. 1 . 1 / ♦ ♦ ♦ - 1 / •1 III - 1 1 • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ � • ♦ ❖1 ❖ ♦ ♦ ♦•.♦ 111• / 1 1 ♦. ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ) / ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦.' 1 1 / � 1 ♦ 1111 - : 1 / / 1 _ - ,1 / ♦ / ♦ / ♦ ♦ ♦ � / ♦ / ♦ / ♦ ♦ ♦• ♦♦ ♦ant ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦.� ♦1 . ♦4 .•. ♦ ♦ ♦. 1 /. / ♦ / ♦ / ♦ ♦ ♦ / ♦ / . / . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ X11.♦ ♦ � `- �A��������I 1 ♦ ♦ � 1 . 1 ♦ ♦ ... �.. ! . ' -� ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ _ ° ; , + / :�:�i4 / 0�:i!� �IIIIIIIIIIIIIII i. _� -� -� -� ♦ -� � -� I • `. � 1 iiiii /••iii -�• ♦ - /iiiii /1•iiii ■ - - IIII' III - - �llimu'lll • ♦ ♦• ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦•♦•• ♦♦ 4 ♦♦♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦•• ♦ ♦♦ ♦11 : / / / ♦•/ 1 _� ! � � / ♦ � � X ♦ 1 . 1 1 1 , . • / ♦/� I ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ � ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ............... ❖i i ❖i : ❖:•i `:. :O ❖ : ❖:4 ❖i ♦ ♦♦♦. �• ♦♦••♦ .11 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦.It ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ 111 •♦• ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦.♦ - N ♦ ♦/ 1 ♦ 10 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ /1 ♦•. ♦ ♦• ♦♦♦ I ♦1♦ ♦ 1 • ♦ ♦• ♦• ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦1 1 ♦♦ (� ♦ ♦ / ♦ ♦ / /♦ 1 11 •.♦ ♦ ♦ -• ♦ ♦ ♦ •- ♦.1 ♦ • • • 1 1 1 • - ♦ ♦ 1 •♦ ♦•. fop ♦. 1 . 1 4 . ♦ . 1 ♦ / ♦ , ♦/� 1 ♦ / . 1 ' 1 ♦ ♦ / ♦ 1 ♦ ♦ 1 ♦ ♦ 1 1 ♦ • ♦ ♦• ♦ ♦ ♦l ♦/ 1 ♦•• ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦• ♦• ♦ ♦•♦ 1 - 1 ♦/1 ♦• ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦• ♦••. �♦ ♦♦♦: - - - ♦ ♦11 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦• • • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦� ♦ ♦ ♦♦ •♦ ♦ ♦ ♦1 ♦ ♦ ♦•• l 1 ♦1♦ ♦ ♦•• 1 ♦ ♦♦ • ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦• -. ,� ♦ ♦ ♦ .• ♦• ♦•♦ ±1 ♦1 ♦ ♦ . ♦ . ♦:•1 ::..` • 1 ♦ ♦• ♦• ♦• ♦• ♦• ♦•• 1 • . : ,4 • ♦,♦ :/ ! / • 1 ♦ / ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ / ♦ ♦ ♦ / ♦ 1 = la zliz ♦- `••_•_, . �• i 1 ,!• ♦• ♦• ♦• ♦• ♦• ♦• ♦• ♦• ♦•.'!• ♦•� ' CID ate I �■1, ■r Jill 0© Shed Nmber I A New Custom Duplex for. Lave Date. ",III 1 i ❖ : ❖ : ❖ : ❖ : ❖i /: ❖ : I © �o ����o �ee888ee88��eeeeeeee�e�����eeeoeeeeeeeoe ■11■■III■Illr /IA lllrll■I■11r � git ro Shed Nmber I A New Custom Duplex for. Lave Date. ",III 1