HomeMy WebLinkAboutCascade Village Pre-SDDf ftl-A A
MANSFIELD VILLAGE I'IASTER PLAN
PRELII4INARY BUILDING AREA SUMMARY
April 26, 1979
A. Hotel- lst floor 3l,300- 2nd floor 29,000- 3rd f'loor 29,000- 4th f'loor 12,000 (assumed)- ground floor .l1,900 (excluding dock, garage & service areas)- Total .|13,200 S.F. gross interior area under hotel
- Service area, parking and storage areas under retail/condominium b1 dg =
9,800 S.F. Gross (approximately 3500 S.F. interior)
B. Learning Center Complex- lst floora. Retail .|1,800 S.F. netb. CMC - 3,400 S.F. grossc. Library - 4,500 S.F. grossd. Auditorium - 3,800 S.F. gross including stagee. Public Circulation/Lobby - all facilities - 5,500 S.F. gross- 2nd floora. Cl4C = 6,800 S. F. grossb. Library = 3,2AA S.F. gross (allow for some Z-story spaces)c. Publjc C'irculation/Lobby - all facilities = 4,500 S.F. grossd. Condominiums (4) = 8,000 S.F. gross including circulation- 3rd floora. CMC,/Free Enterprise = 6,800 S.F. grossb. Sports Dimension = I,500 S.F.c. Public Circulation/Lobby - all facilites = 4,000 S.F. grossd. Meeting Rooms = 3,800 S.F. grosse. Condominiums (4) = 8,000 S.F. gross including circulation- Total gross interior area of building = 75,600 S.F.
C. Village Square Condominiums- lst floora. Retail = 4,200 S.F. netb. Condominiums (a) 6,400 S.F, netc. Circulation/Public Space = 2,500 5.F. gross- Znd and 3rd floor (similar)a. Condominiums (7) = 11,200 S.F. gross (assume 1,600 S.F. each)b. Circulation/Public Space = 1,500 S.F. Gross- Total gross interior area of building = 38 jqQ_!_._E-,
r ,'i*rrrrrD
'TLLAGE
MASTER ,t
PRELIMINARY BUILDING AREA SUMMRY
Page 2
D. Stream Side Condominiums (2 buildings)- Each building = I8 unjts x .l,700 S,F. net = 30,600 S.F. of living area- Circu'lation/Pub'lic Space/Service = 6,400 S.F. gross- Total gross S.F. each bui]ding = 37,000 S.F.- Total gross S.F. = 74n000 S.F.
E. 0wner-0ccupied Condominjums (34)- Each unit 1,000 S.F. net residential and 600 S.F. each for parking & serivce- Total gross area of units = 54,400 S.F.
F,Renta'l Units (32)- Each unft 850 S.F. net residential- Total gross area of units = 27,200 S.F.
Athletic Club
H. Parking Structure (350 spaces)- Total gross area of building = 127,000 5.F. (equals 362 S.F./car)
I. Large Managed Condominiums (28)- Each unit .|,700 S.F. new residential = 47,600 S.F. gross- Parking in garages for 6 units @ 300 S.F. each = .|,800 S.F. gross- Parking structure = I1,700 S.F. gross- Total gross area of all units = 6l ,100 S.F.
Tennis courts (4) = 29,500 gross S.F.
Handball courts (4) =T;000 gross S.F.
Club (3 stories) including indoor pool area = 8,500Public Circulation/Elevator Lobby = 5,400 S.F. grossTotal gross area of building = 47,40A S.F. (excludes
t:-
S.F. gross
exterior areas)
J. Total Gross Interior Area of Entire'1. Hotel & Service Area2. Learning Center Complex3. Village Square Condominjums4. Stream Side Condominiums5. 0wner-0ccupied Condom'iniums6. Rental Units7. Athletic Club8. Parking Structure9. Large Managed Condominiums
Project.|23,
75,
38'
74,
54'
27,
47,
127 ,
61 ,
000
600
500
000
400
204
400
000
r00
200628,S. F.
MANSFIELD VILLACE MASTER PLAN
PRELIMINARY BUILDING AREA SUI4MRY
Page 3
K. Parkingl. Parking structure 350 spaces2. Parking structure G
Large Condominiums 3l3. Under Hotel Service 84. 0wner-0ccupied Condos 345. Large Condominiums 66. Surface Guest Parking
on entire site 107. Parallel parking - Temporary 16Total 455 spaces
'.Llrx. 14 , ttoa
R^Lul.-o '27, tcoct
0"t''*' * ' t{00
,4/€a 4 -aTncra^1Crf,C
I
Mansfield Vi1la.ge
Vai1, Colorado
Prepared for
Andrev Norris III
Prepared bY
A11en Gerstenberger As sociaLes
2040 14th Street Suite 100
Boulder, Colorado 80302
23 April 1979
(
'I
i
7-
"Ft'
23 April 1-979
Andrerv l{orris III
P.O. Box 294]-Vail , Colorado 81657
Deal Andy:
mation
mation
concept
RE:
of additionalbut this
c<-rmmuni-tY.
phase of
Enclos'ed is the final report and supporting infor-'
for the proposed Va1l Learning Center' The infor-
presenteil iL of sufficient detail to explain the
and the space requirements of the various elements'
As you are aware, there is a great deaL
work required to refi.ne the building programs 'can be done once the soncept is accepted by the
Should you have any questions about this
the report, I'd be pleased to answer them.
:-'D!t'
sm'e
fufu*ti
Allen Gerstenberger
Enc.
AG: bg
!,)ie1 l.iih Sir.,*t S,.rkc lC)J Bcui(er, Col,rnnio 8C(5Cl l.,rl*t-i-l?-B?if'l
()
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary
General Dcsign ConcePt
Benefits to Vail
Summary of Components
Colorado r\{ountain CollegeVail Public LibrarYCenter for the Study of Free Enterprise
Commun'ity Auditorj-um and ldeeting Rooms' Executive Seminar & Conference Center
Sports Dimensions Center
Appendices
A;
1
3.
3
D
5
7I
10
10t2
B:
C:
D:
(
Colorado llountain College: Analysis
of Space Requirements and Supporting
Data
Feasibility Report for the Vail Public
Library
Exectuive Seminar and Conference
Tacility
Draft Statement for the Center for the
Study of lree Enterprise
I
F'
(r nq Center
va i 'l , col orado
slDtr{ARY
mansfield vjllage
The proposed Vail- Learning Center will provlde quality faciliries for
educationil and cultural prograrns for Vaj-1 rs residents and guests ' Designed
as an integral part of Mansfield Vi11age, the Learning Center rsi1l house
the CoLorado Mountain College campus, the Vail Public Library,i a corununity
theaEer'anri meecing roon0s, an Executive Seminar/Conference facility' and.
several specialieed educational organizati.ons includln g rhe Center fot the
Study of Free Enf.erprLse and Ehe S?o?ta Dimensi-ans Center' The total
facility will contain approxinateli 37,000 square feet of functional- interlor
spa ce ,
The types of programs to be provided chrough the Learning center include
continui.ng education Programs, cultural events (including art, music, dance'
and. li.nited Cramatic performances), research, professional training programs'
and public neeLings and symposia. Functional areas included in Ehe Present
design are:
* An auditorium (seating approximately 250) with sloped floor
. ana ftffiI-Gl'ting Lo be designed and equipped for audio-visual
presenLations, lectures, plays and rnusical performancesl
* A dozen seminar and class roo-ms (seati'ng 10-25 each);
* A large ffi tooro, trith the ability to be
srrb-divided into s".,erat Enatler meeting rooms (seating
approximately 390 persons theater style and 350 banquet style);
* The Y-ai1 Public Library, housing 50-60,000 volumes and providing
necessary support facilities; .
* A research library specializing in lieeralure and audj.o-visual
infornation peifJining to Lhe free enterprise system, econoni-cs,
taxation, and business operations;
* Teaching laboraCor:ies, including dance and exercise studios,
;tudiot f"r cerattri.'s ' photography, graphic arts, and other
fine arts Programs ; and
* Adninistrative offices for a nutober of educational- and cultural
@g Colorado 1lountain College, the Cencer
foi ctre Scudy of Free Enterprise' the Vail Publ-ic Library' and
the Sports Dimensions CenEer.
Tf"
1Fr?
l|r
Pa'.e 2
General space requlremengs have been deveJ.oped for Ehe components of
-the Learnlng Center. This anal.ysis was conducted to detersdne the comPati-
bility of uies, as well as to ascertain the amount and characteristics of the
f unct,lonal space requirements. Each of the uses viLL be brlefly described
later in thls report, wlth supportlng data contalned in the appendices.
The followlng exhibit outllnes the space requirements for Ehe cornporients
of the Learning Center: i
{Exhibit 1:
for the Vail Learning Cencer
Areas ('sq-ft-)
Clas srooms
Adminis cration
Mlscellaneous
Vail PubU.c Library ...,
Book storage area
Childrenr s area
Reading area
lleetlng room
Adrni.riis tra tlon & work
Miscellaneous
2;800
850
1,000
200
1,780
I ,150
4,430
1, 140
1.350
1, 100
840
4, 100
2, 500
800
200
600
. 8,490
1 ,700
3,500
990
. 160
. 2,140
7,4L5 sf.
1 ,010
Ir070
L r44O
11,035 sf
7,780
area
Meeting/ s erninar
Research library
Admins tra t ion
Miseellaneous
ro ons
Audltorium
lleeting rooms (2)
Adminis trat i-oo
llisc ellaneous
Executive Seminal & Conference Center
Pre-funcLion area
Funcrion room
Meeling rooms
Offices
Kitchen and storage
Sports Dimensions CenEer :............' 1t650
@nroom 8oo
AdminisLtation 750
Hiscellaneous f00
GRAI\D TOTAL 37,485 sf
.!F-
'--rt-
(r ot
It should be noced Chat these are prellrui.nary esttnafes of. needs and may
vary somewhaf followlng development of detailed analysis for the various
uses. At thls phase of the plaoning process Ehe estinates are sufficiencly
detaiLed.
Genert Deslgn Concept
The Val1 Learning Cencer is being designed as an integral . part of
ltansfiel-d Village and the Vail comnunity, lt shal1 boLh contribute to and
benefit from the life of Lhe area. Its central l-ocation rcithin the project
was chosen tO encourage people to e*p1ore, participate, and share in Che
variety of learning opporEunities. The programs offered, the relafionship
between interlor and exteriot spaces, and the interacLion wit,h ofher func.tioos
within Hansfield Village all reinforce acEive involvement by residents and
vj.slEors in Ehe Learning Center. IL becomes an inEegral parC of 'the daily
life in the Villager not an isolated camPus.
There is value j-n Ehis approach. Not olrly does Lhe envlronmenc supPort
the learning experience, it can even by the learning experience. As city
planner Kevin Lynch phrased iL, t'...the environmenf can be an educational
device, an instigator of human change, if it is open and explainable' if iL
j-s rich in new inf ori,ration, if iE offers the opportunlty for the exetcise
of nel.r functions. " Watciring potters, painters, and dancers at work, gtudenls
cllsplaying their talents in publj-c arE festivals and outdoor concerts ' and
visitors and loeals participating in short r.'orkshops aod discussions will
all adci a new dimension to enj o;,'ment and vital"ity of the public spaces '
These. experiences will create a setting rich in conmunication' one lrhich is
an education in itself because it pr-ociuces a ciranging flow of nerv information.
One of the goals j"s to make i.fansfield Village the cenEer for srrch excilnent
and learning.
. The ruix of uses necessary to accomplish chis goal is critical. A
variety of uses have been chosen because they al.e compatible, yet different
enough f,o each add its own special ingredienC. \,liE.hin Ehe Learning Center
iEsel-f , the conbination is logical: a college canPus' a public 1ib'ra{y'
a specialized research foundat.ion, tied together wifh excellent meeting'facilities rangigg f:om the small "boardroom" to the large auditorium. Each
reinforces the others r,-hile maintaining a distinct personalily all i-ts own.
The resulc should be an area Ehat is ali're, dynamic, fun.
Benelits to VaiL
There are a ngmber of benefits Eo the Vail- communj.ty resul-ting from the
developmenf, of the Learning Center. Naturally, it will benefit Mansfield
VlJ.l,age, buE not at the expense of the comrnunity or other neighborhoods in
Vai1. QuiUe the conErary. It will provicle needed sPaces and activities for
several existing prograns which donrt have adequace facillties. Think only
of CllCt s A-Frame or the Vail Public Library or the lack of auditorium facil-
ltiesinVail,Theproblemsareobvious'ThereisnocenEeroflearningorculture ln Vai1. Yet the nced exists.
gF.!t'
("r
/l r45s -tolt
There are u tttitb*t of dlrect beneflts to Vall] lncLudlng'the followlng:
* Ihe construction of an excelj-ent nevr canpus for Colorado Mounuain College
td1l al-low them not. only the chance to lmprove lhelr present Programs 'but Eo expancl their curricula lnto ner.r fields (such as resort management t
recreational training programs' and business progran$)
* The new publlc library facility will be designed as a library' noE sirnply
left-over space, Reading areasr lisrening rooms, organized book stacks 'and decent work areas foi the sEaff will all support more aird better
llbrary programs. Access will be sirnplified by the proximity to Ehe
p"""..rg.i unloading zone, the bus stop, and the structured parking 1ot.
tt "it1 support the other educational facilities and benefit from theu as
uell-. The near-by cormnercial and residential uses will also have a
positive effect on the libratY.
* Facilities will be available for use by cultural and educational groups '
such as the Vail Instilute, other universities, and specialized research
organizat.ions .
* The Learning Center r"ri11 offer new opportunities to residents and guests'
ltcanmarkVai]-asanareavherepeoplegoEodiscussissuesandseek
solutions and, rnosc importantly, lo learn' It ttas che potential to ex-
pand our definiEion of the term "Lo lecreaEet' by returning to the concept
Lf "t" cfeatett -- to begin anelt' Lo improve oneself ' SimPly' to grolt'
The Vail Learning Centef cannot and will not be all things to all
people. Its goal is not ro change.the imagie of Vail. or to touch Lhe lives
of ..ru.yorl. passing througtr our valley. IE can, however, provide opPortu[-
ities. It can provide needed courmuni.Ey facilities, assist in improving
existing programs, and broaden our perspectives. The Learning center is an
-exciting concept. I! j.s a concept that of f e::s something important to those
who wish to share and to learn.
The balance of this Ieport presents summarles of the conrponents of the
Learning Center. and appendices vith suPporting daua' Thi's report has
. attempt;d to address tirl quescion, "h'hat is a tlearning, cenLert ?" and
to prtvide a level of detjit sufficienr to veigh irs value co Vail, Addi-
tlonal progfam studies will be requi.red for each of the componenf,s' both in
terrns of their internal needs, as r.rel'l as their relationships wif,h other
. functions. This work will be done following conceptual approval of the
proposal .
I
ot EaEe )
t-
sulorARY OF COI{PONENTS 0r TXE-V-AIL-LEARNTNG C
Thls secelon vri]-l brlefly describe the lndividual components of the
Learning CenEer as included in the development Progran. The elernencs revieraed
include coLorado MounEain co1lege, the vail Public Library' the center
for the Study of Free EnEerprise, the Community Auditoriurn and MeeLing Rooms,
the Executive Seminar / Conf erence faciLity, and rhe Sports Dimenslons Center'
Support lnformatj.on is contained in the appendices. ':
t
Colorjldo l{ountai"n Colle.ge
Colorado l4ountain College is a fully accredited community college,
serving five counties in rlestern colorado. The continuing Educacion Division
providescorununity.bisedoperationsandservlcestaj.loredtotheneedsof
ihe local residenEs of the varj.ous communigies. Classes were first pr'ovided
through.rhis program in Vail in 1969-70; since then the enroLlment has groi\'n
to over 2,900 students in Vail and a combined total of over 3,500 for Vail-
Minturn. The cnroLlmentg are projecfed to conCinue to increase, but at a
decreasing raLe.
CMC has been interested in securing iuproved facilities in Vail co repl.ace
the 1600 sq. ft. former sewer plant that is presently their "campus.l' This
study conside.red their scheduling, class charactelistics, and space require-
xoents to detenuine the type of faciliEies needed to Lrest satisfy the vaiL
progran. Irom this infotmation, it was derer:mined that the classes are gen-
Lt"ffy srcall (averaging 9 sCudents/class), are scheduled during the evening
hours (6-10 pm) llonday through Thursday, and a::e pr:edomirrately laboratory
coufses (65'l ot the courses do not use a lecture or discttssion fornat) '
The uosL popular clases -- accounting for about hal-f of tl-re enloll:np-nts --
.are courses that require an open, gymnasium type of room suj-tab1e for.. physi-
cal- exercise and dance.
Based on the denrand analysis and numerous discussions r"rith the cMC
staff, the buildlng program founci in ExhibiL 2 r'as developed' It reflects
the conmunityt s desire for courses involving creative arts, physical
conditj.oning, and acadenic advancement. The two generic tyPes of educa-
tional spaces required are "lairoratories" and "class/r0eeting rooms' " Generally
the classroons requi.re seats and tabLes; the "lab€" involve a variety of
other programs, ranging in needs from open, unfurnished roornb (as for dance
. elasses) io "o.rt"u" lri th specific equipement needs (such as ceramics). (More
detailed inf ornration and backgroud daEa about CllC and the Vail--Uluturn
Continuing Education Pxograms is contai-ned in r\ppendix A' )
1*w
(" ,.\/
ot
Bv.hibit 2:
sP$cE RgQUTRTMENTS FOR coLoRADg 4oUNTAIN CoLLEGE
for the Vail. Learning Center
Labora tories
Page.r
500
500
500
a. Heavy workshopsI. Cerami.cs2. Metal .shop (jewelrY'
sculp t ure )
Photgraph & Graphic Arts
1. Photography
2. Graphic arts'3. Video & film
Printrnaking, fine ar:ts,
.clean arts
1. Printmaking
2. Firre arts (2-D)
3. Fiber & clean arts
llusic and dance
1. Music arts
?.. Dance
Education & recreation
1. Exercise/dance studio
Tood preparation studio
Sub-tota1: LaboratorY sPace
Cl-as s r oom€4'fge tjn g roons
a. Classroom A (seating =
b. Classroom B (seating =
c. Classroom C (seating =
d. Classroom D "
e. Cl-assroom E t'
f. Classroom F "
Sub-total: Classroom sPaee
Adminis tra t ion
a. Sraff offices (5)
b. Recep t ion./ re g i.s cration
c. Xerox, Print & st.orage
d. Res trooms
Sub-rota1: Adninistration
650 sq.fE.
i
390
1,040 sq.ft.
b.
c.
d.
I ,500
975
600
600
2,L75
e.
800
800
400
7,415 sq. fr.
30)
r5)
10)
270
200
135
135
13s
r35 tr0t0 sq.ft.
500
150
200
320
I , 170 sq. fu.
1,440 sq.fc.
1,500
157" of gross sq. t-t.
.TOTAT, FIPOR AITEA I1,035 sg.fr.
ot
Va11 Publ-ic LibrarY
The exlsting Public Library, operated by the Town' ls housed ln cranped
quarters in Ehe H,rtrclp"f-SuiJ'ding" There has been agreement for the past'
several years thaL Ehe present facility is totally inadequace to meet" Ehe
needs of the communily.' tto!'aarur , other denrands on Ehe Toru'o t s resources have
received PrioriLy and lt has therefore not been posslble to coosEruct an
adequaf,e new li.brarY.
In 1978, the Town reEained the firm of Royston BanamoEo beck & Abey
to develope a "Library Feasibility SEudy"' It was completed in July 1978'
The study outline g;;;t;i'6;t" ttqoitt*ents fot a new librarv facility and
revieped alternative siEes. At the time of the RHBA sludy' the potenEial
development of }tansiield Village and the Vail Learning center srere noE
antici?ated and vere iherefore noL reviewed as a po.cential site'
ThestudysetouteighE'criteriaforseleetingasite.Ascanbeseen'
thelocationoftheLibraryinconjuctio:rwiththeLearningcenreriseon-
sistenE \,rith these criterla:
1. A location which strengthens lhe total community ' promoLes inter-
actj.on of residents and guests, an<l is cenrral t'o LionsHead and
to the Village'
2. A location direcLly and conveniently accessible by pedestrian' bus
rider, and bicYclist '3. A location reaionably accessible by automoblle'
-4. On a sice now ovmed ty tt'e Tovrn of Vail' or available aE lo$t or
reasonabLe cost'
5. Within an environmental setling conducive Eo relaxing ' teading'
repose' research' The surrounli"g tp""u" should possess a pleasant
. exisEing landscape, or provitle aalquace area for the installation
of a Pleasant landscaPe
6. Reading rooms' chi'ldrents library should orient to the gouth for year
round sun and passive solar charac telist ics '
7. -Vierus of the slopes or other pleasant feaEures are desirable' The
viess should be outrsara ana open' rather than- contained and inrvard '
g. Abnormal, or expensive constru;tion probleras should be avoided. The
' space availabll should permlt normal construction techniques'
The consulEants reconmended the site t'rhere the A-Frame is presently
located, adjacenE to Dobson Arena. sirr"n tt. proposed development of the Vail
Learning Cenler, the }tansfield Vi1-lage site has become a prime candidace
for the Public Library site' The courpatibility with. other educational
instirutions, the ease of access uv uii roa.r,- the pleasant landscaping
andviews,andtheinEeractionbetv/eenbothresidentsandvisitors'makes
ltansfield Vlllage a natural location for the Library'
BasedonconversatlonsviththeLibrarian'CharlynCoscello'thepossi-
bi1-ity ot 1ocatlng thc Library in Utnsiiefd Viilage is logical and would be
consistent wiEh the llbraryt s goal of p rovid ing ,be tter and expanded communiEy
programs. Ib is beneficlai foi the lltrary st;ff to be,involved with the
planning process at this sEage Lo ensure Lia[ che faclllty saLisfies their
needs.
a()
rr{{
YT
ll
A coPY of
Based on this
sPace progra$
Fogl! storage area
500
1,200
700
400
sg. ft
2,800 sq.ft.
I ,000
850
I,850
200
150
800
150
180
500
1,780
Exhibit 3l
uIRIslENrs FoR v,\I!-!!!!l-q'IIgRARY
for tir" Vail Learning CenEer
Page I--f,
D
the Llbrary Feasibllity Report ls includccl in Appendlx B'
information ana Aisc.'ssions- with Hs' Costello' the following
has been included in the tearoing Center proposal:
-*
Reference area
Non-f icti-on
Flction,
Periodicals
Er,lgg-ArgasAdults
Children
Hee-ting F.oom
Admini straLi on & work area
Check out desk
Work space
Lib rarian
Staff roon
Audio visual wotk area
card files
Res trooms
Misc. , circulaLioJr 'IIi sc e 11an eous
7,780 sq.ft'
GRAND TOTALI
e 1l
\ _.'
Exhlbit 5:
Cr,ACN REQTIIRN{ENTS FOB
THE EXECUTIfor the Vail Learning CenEer
' CaPacity
P.oom Sq, Ft. Auclitorium Classroont U-Shape Receptj'on BanqueE
t an 95 240 I7OIyu IJv
..rn (nn 350Function Room 3500 390 270 ' 195 Jvv r
ot Pagt
Pre-Function 1700
Heering Rooms
Roorit'A
Room B
Room C
' Offices
S torage
25 15 45 30
25 15 45 30
25 ls 45 30
330 35
330
330
160
1000
35
35
, I Serving kitchen 1140
- TOTIL anSA': 8490 se'ft
Y'|llFt
. qa,tott\
SpgrtS Dlmedsions, CenEer
I"lith the recreatj.ooal orientacion of vail and the developmenc of the
Learning center, it is logical thal a Program be provlded_ehat weds athletics
and academics. such a proposal has been received frour a local group.. It
irr.rot.ru, the creatio.t oi ttu "Spor:ts Diuensions Center,t' whj"ch uill provide
technical and psychological traini-ng programs on issues revolving around
physlcal activiries and the mind. The general concePt involved is that
physlcal activitj-es provide an appropriaEe media for addressing a.variety of
psychological issues, rangi1lg from stress manage ent to self-imaging to
irri.tp"riooal relationships. The sp'ecif ic educational programs have been
in the developmenc pto.."u for several years by a number of groups around Lhe
country. A pilot piogt",o has been tesued in Vail and irs success has led Lire
sponsors to seek avenues Eo ins t j-Eut ionalize the prograns'
The nature and quality of the piograns being discussed are consisLent
with the overall goais of the Learning Center. Therefore, the space require-
ments have been includecl in the design Pr:oglam. A major elemeDt of their
frogt* is the "aEhletets evaluation room" vrhich will provide a tesring
iaborarory for technical analysis of the physiological condiEion and responses
of the human body to varying situations and pressures. The f ollot'ring Program
requireraents have been developed for the sPorts Dimens j.ons center:
l'Exhibit 6:
SPA.CE REQUIREI1ENTS FOI.
THE SPORTS Dril[i{s-roi'ls c],rNTER
for the Vail Learniug Center
Athletet s Evaluation Rooin 800 sq'ft'
AdministTation & Reception (2 offices) 750
TOTAL I ,550 sq. ft.
'!T"
:
IO!t{ II{ANAGR:CTIARD CAPI,I\}{
"ii,#/l on,*1{
DATE:a
RI
DPAffIt\rlEtfI DIFSCIOR :DfCI( RYAI{' C0.'$ruNITY DBVtr-Oplvffi{T
T0: TOIIN ffi}CIL
SII&IilT: PUBL]C HEARING IN CONS]DERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN FOR
PARCEL A OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOUR (SD4), AND THE
ADDITION OF ONE ACRE OF LAND TO TH]S D]STRICT.
SIATISTICS:
APPLICANT: Andrew Nomis II, Mansfield Corporation
NAME 0F DEVEL0PMENT: lvlansfield Vjl1age
AREA: 18.076 Acres
ZONING: l8.B2B Acres-specia'l Development Djstrjct Four (SD4)
1.250 Acres-Residential Cluster (RC)
R@UES'I: The apit'licant is requesting approval of the addition of one acreto the Special Development District Four (SD4) and approval of site plan
that contains the following uses: Hotel , Commercial Space, Learning Center Complex
Condomi.njums Renta'l Units, Athletic Club. For more detajl 'inforntation see
the attached memoiandum,
PI-AI{NING & SMMONI,MYTAL Ol[\fi SSICT{ ACTICT{ :
A motjon was made to approve the site p1 an for Mansfield Vi11age, Parce'l A
of Special Development District Four (SD4), and add'ition of onc acre of landto this District based upon the conditjons set forth on page eight of the
rnemo dated 5-18-79 from the Departrent of Conmunity development with the
exceptions and amendments to numbers 1,6,7, and 8 as mentioned above, Gerry
White seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. The items and comments
are on pages two and three of the PEC Minutes for ltlay 22, 1979.
DPART:\,IENT REOIIIMB'IDATION :
The Community Development Departrent recommends approval of the lvlansfield ViliqSe
project subject to the condjtions noted in the staff memorandum dated l,lay lB, 1979.
The Cornrnunity Development Department considers that the commercial space shouldprimarily be on'ly for residents and people that are coming to the hote'l and
learning center and not the entire community, The applicant has not provided
an economic study to justify the amount of commercial space requested.
The issue comes down to "Does the Town Council support development of a third
Village for Vail?" Through the proposal presented the Staff considers that ath'ird vi'llage is formed with impacts on the bus system, and traffic within
the Community,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COI4MISSION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMJNITY DEVELOPMENT
MY 18, 1979
PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL
OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOUR (SD4)
OF LAND TO THIS DI5TRICT.
SITE PLAN FOR PARCEL
ADDITION OF ONE ACRE
OF THE
AND THE
APPLICANT: Andrew Norris II, l4ansfield Corporation
NAME 0F DEVEL0PMENT: l,lansfield Village
AREA: 18.078
ZONING: 16.828 Acres-Special Developrnent District Four (SD4)
1.250 Acre-Residential Cluster (RC)
REQUEST
The Applicant is requesting approva'l of the addition of one acre to the Special
Deve'lbinnnt Districd f'our (SD4) and approval of site p'lan that contains the
STATISTICS
fo1l ow'ing uses: '
Hotel:-Riloms 150 at 400 square feet
Restaurant 88 seats
Coffee Shop 20 seats
Special ty Shops
Conference Facility
Ki tc h en s /Stora ge,/Serv i ce
Sub total
Parking
Lobby, Public Area, Hallways
Villaqe Square--ffinE-seE-eonAominiums l8 at '|500
Reta il /Restaurant/Nei ghborhood
Sub Total
Publ ic Space, Circulat'ion
Service/Storage
square feet
l,larket
GRFA Parking Spaces
60,000
28,800
tggat1r Jootage
6o,o0o
3 ,500
800
2,400
8.000
6,300
E1;00'0
.3,500
25,000
108';500
28,800
4,200
33,000
4,ooo
3,500
40;500
lFir
lileno to PEC
5-'t8-79- Page Two-Mansfield Vi'l lage
Learning Center-TeEiiTResTewant/Book Store/
Photo Gallery/lline & Liquor Store/
Branch Cleaners/Office Space
Library
Auditorium
F{anaged Condominiums B at 2,000 square ft.
I'leeting Rooms
Sub Total
Lobby /Circulation
Stream Side Condominiums (l',lanaqedl
quare ft.
Ci rcul ation/Publ ic a reas,/Service
Owner-Occupi ed Condomi ni ums
Condom'iniums 34 at 1,050 square ft.
Encl osed Parking-on site
34 at 265 square ft.
17 surface parking
Rental Units-Tp;ffimEF 30 at 75 square feet
Enclosed Parking-on site
30 at 265 square feet
22 surface parking
Residenti al Condominiums@0squareft.
Enclosed Parking 28 at 265 square ft.(on site)
14 surface parking
Parking Structure/Athl etjc Facil ity
et
Tennis Courts 4. Handball 4
Lockers/Showers/Pool
Lobby/Snack Bar
T0TAL ENCL0SED PARKING (Spaces)
TOTAL SURFACE PARKING
TOTAL PARKING
GRFA
GRFA Parki$ Spaces
't6,000
6l,200
35,700
26 ,250
47,600
350
Square Footaqe
I1 ,800
7,700
3,Boo
16,000
22,300
6'1,600't4;000
75,600
61 ,200'12,800
74,000
35, 700
9,0,I0
4f,z]5
26,250
8,480
34,730
5l
52
4247,600
7,420
5,5_,om-
'l 27 ,000
29,5oo
4,000
8,500
5,400
t74;m'0
450
53m
275,550
l'lemo to PEC
5-18-79
Page Two Continued
BACKGROUND
Town Council approved the Special Development District ordinance No. 5
in 1976. The il1 an contained four development areas: Co'l dstream with
45 units, Glen Lyon containing 52 primary/secondary duplex 1ots, Glen
Lyon Office Building Site, and the parce'l under consideration in. this
r-equest. Part of the purpose of the requirement of the Spec-ial Develop-
merit District was to insure the quality of development and a'lso a'llowfor some flexibility in the developnrent of this parcel of'land.
Continued on Page Three
-{pqr'
tMemo to PEC
5-'t8-79
Page Three-Mansfiel d Vi 11age
In reviewing Special Development District Four (SD4), the Community
Development Department considers that the maior provision which effects
the site plan irnder consideration.by the P'lanning Commission is the
inst'itutibnal or educationa'l center. As defined in Special Develop-
ment Distri ct Four (SD4 ), the 0rdinance s.tates:
"Inst'itutjonal or Education Center provided that if
the center is constructed then the following shall be
conditional uses in coniunction therewith; l odges
includjnq accessory eating and drinking or recreationa'l
estab'l ishments not occupying more than 20% of the gross
floor area of the Iodge 1o which it is an accessory."
The other important section under conditjona'l use is uBI which prov'i des
the definitibn of an institution or educationa'l center and discussionof the efficiency dwelling units. The wording of "Bu is as follows:
"The term'institut'i onal or educational center'means a
pub'l ic or pri vate institution for I earn'i ng, instructionbr continuing education. Such facilities may be-utilizedfor seminars or educatjona'l programs and may include con-
ference and meeting rooms, audio-vi sual facif ities and
necessary accessory useage such as dining rooms and. effjciency dwelling units. The phrase'efficiency-
dwelling irnits'means any room or group of rooms with-out fu'11 kitchen facil iiies, but which may incl ude arefrigerator, s'i nk, and cook top of no more than two
heating units, designed for or adapted to occupancy b.y
individuals attending the institutional or educationalcenter. The effjc'i ency dwel I ing units shal I be access-ible from common corridors, walks or balconies w'i thout
passing through another effjciency dwe'l I ing unit,
accomodatjon unit or dwel I ing unjt and each said unit
shal I not exceed f our hundred square f eet, and sha'l 'l
' be considered in determining the total GRFA a1'lowedfor each deve'l opment area. "
Other aspects of the Ordinance that should be cons'i dered are
density and dwelling units.
Densi t Units-Development Area A-Shall not exceed 252 unit,
Density Fl oor Area-the Gross Residentiaj Floor Area of the deve'l opment
in Devi'lopment Area A sha'll not exceed35% of the land area or 269'480
square febt. This includes an al'l ocation for the one acre parcel to be
jnc'l uded in SD4 District based on the current zoning.
Under the additional amenities section the developer sha11 provide
adequate private transportation service to the owners-and guests. of
the'deve'lbpment so as to transport them from the dbvelopment to,the
Village Core Area and LfonsHead area as outlined in the'i mprove0
.G
3;13-13-" -Mansrrertfr r ase I
A ordeve'lopment plan inas an institutiona'l the eventor educati
Devel opment Area
ona'l cen ter .
B are developed
P0L rcY quEsTI0Ns
rty as proposed have an adverse
L i on sHead area ?
ment of a third village for Vail?
n conformance with the approved
(sD4)?
ent considers that the need forquested has not been justified.
commercial type uses. For aunt of commercial space is notial space as a viable economic
from other parts of the communitY
automobi'l es wil'l eome to the site
e Department considers that thereial for the residents and tourists
evelopment District Four (SD4)
pace, learning center' auditorium,locatjon the Community Developmentvillage wi'l'l be formed. This will
road system and other services with
between Vai'l Village and LionsHeadith the development of this Mansfiel
de a good ljnk between Vail Village,
i'11 even be more diff icult to
cerned wfth the impact that thisad, as the Town is currently work'ingof LionsHead to improve the economic
(SD4) clearly deals with theer. The appl icant i s Proposingh the Community Developmente a direct relationship with the
on of the Special Developmentes that if the center is con-be condjtiona'l uses in conjunction
1n
Does the development of the prope'impact on the Town of Vai I and/or
Does the Town support the develop
Is the proposed learning center i
Speci aI Devel opment Di stri ct Four
The Community Development Departmthe amount of commercial space re
Proposed js 21 ,000 square feet ofdevelopment of this size, the amoneeded. In order to have commercenterpri se, residents and touri stwill be a necessity. Additionaland impact the street system. Thshould on'l y be sufficient commerc
I ocated in thi s overa'll Special D
devel opment.
By having the hotel, conmercial sand recreation facil ities at thisDepartment considers that a third
have an impact on the bus system,the community. The current I inkhas not been wel'l establ ished. l.]Vi'llage Area the ability to provi
.LionsHead and Mansfield Vi1'lage w
establ ish. The Department i s con
devel opment cou'l d have on Li onsHewith the merchants and residentsv'iabil ity of this area.
Speci a1 Devel opment Di s tri ct Fourinstitutional or educational centseveral uses for this center whic
Department considers does not havhotel . The conditiona'l use sectiDistrict Four (SD4) clearly statstructed then the fol lowing sha11
F
tMemo to PEC5-l 8- 79
Page Five-Mansfield Village
therewith;'todges including accessory eating and drink'ingor recreation estab'l ishments, not occupying more than 201t0f the gross floor area of the lodge to which it is anaccessory. First, it is the opinion of the Community Develop-ment Department that the i nsti tuti on or educational center mustbe constructed before the lodge could be considered for constructionat the site. Second, the Department considers that there must bea direct I ink between the loilge and learning center. From theinfornation provided by the app'licant at this timen the staffis concerned that this link might not be there. The uses thatare proposed at the learning center are:
Vail Publ,ic Libraryffia'l hadSince that time the appl ithe Town of Vai'l is consiof the Library, and will
PubI ic Library at this si
the Vail Public Library.cant has been notified thatdering Site 24 as the'locationprobably not consider the Va'ilte.
is is mostly for the local communityquestions whether people staying atusing the Col orado Mountain Col lege
s to what this center is and itshotel .
Col orado Mounta i n
The Staff fee'lsthe staff allodge vlould
CenterThis has been defjned as a proposaT at this time and thestaff is not clear arelationship to the
Sports DimensionThis center would be a f ac'if ity that wou'ld most 'likely
not use the hotel to any great extent.
The auditorium arxl meet-ing-room-ls n-Aefinite communityneed and is supported by the Department. The staff, however,questions why 8,000 square feet of conference facjl jties
are being proposed at the hote'l , The staff considersthat the Iink between the hotel use and the learning centerconference facility use has not been c'l early estab'l ishedin the porposa'l that has been presented at this time.
Memo to PEC
5-18-79
Page Six-Mansfield Vil Iage
SITE PLAN REVIEl,J
}.|e also fee'l that there cou'ld be rsection of the access road with th
South Frontage Road wil'l experiencfrom the developments. [,le bel ieve
peopl e comi ng onto the s'ite wi I1 b
area wh'i ch wi'l I necess i tate a I ef t
To minimize possible traffic bui'ld
movement, we woul d suggest a 'l ef tof an accel'l eration/dece'l I eration
Frontage Road.
l.
The Site Plan as presented has many excellent features" These
incl ude the waterways go'ing through the project, the creationof many exciting pl-azas ana publ ic open spaces., and the p'l ace-
ment of buildings and the mixture of uses on the site.
The overall plan, as presented, is obviously the result of
a great deal of thought and experimentation.
There are, however, a couple of areas that we feel stil'l need
further siudy. Th; first'and most important one is the_general
circulatjon bf automobi'les onto and through the site. The
present design indicates only one access point.for both this
broiect, Coldstream, and the G'len Lyon Primary/!ggondary duplex
ioti. ihis one access point wi'll sLrve almost 400 units at total
bujldout with alI the ti"affic from Glen Lyon home sites and Cold-
stream being circulated through the Mansfie'ld Village^Proiect.
i,le wou'l d su6gest that a second access point f or the
Coldstream ana gten Lyon Deve'l opments be considered.
eal problems at the inter-e Soilth Frontage Road. The
e a mcrjor increase in trafficthat a high Percentage of
e driving from the Va'i1 Villageturn across the Frontage Road.
up associated with this turningtui'n'lane and also the possibility
lane on the South side of the
A third concern is the access onto the excluded one acre parcel .
There were two approximately one acre parce'l s that were not
includea in the bi^tg'inat SpLcia'l Development District. 0ne parce'l
has been successfully acquired, but the other one remains owned
by separate ownershib. Th'is parcel js in a Residentia'l Cluster
z-onen'with the possibtl ity foi. six units. There is no designated
access for thi s' parce'l and we be'l j eve that the proposed_ accessis through an underground service garage. t,le do not beljevethis access to be satisfactorY
Fourthlyr w€ question. the overall size and mass of the parking
structui.e and'the Hotel in realtionship to the Frontage Road' to
other bui'ldings on the site, and to the duplex lots across the
street. A maising model is-being prepared'and will be presented
on Tuesday. This-wjl'l hopefully-assist us in better reviewing
and responding to these rel ationships.
'!It-
Memo to PEC
5-18-7e
Page Seven-Mansfiel d Village
0ur overa'l I impress ion
tl'i th some refinement afeel that it could be
RECOMMEN DATION
Last'l y, there does not seem to be an areasite for outdoor recreational use and acti
a site that js this densely developed that
be a designed outdoor recreational area.
b'i cycle path connecting the various parts
health club present some excellent recreat
suggest that an outdoor recreational site
and-wouId be a real attribute to the site.
Another concern is with the types of uses proposed at t
learning center, and the real tionship betweel !lte cente
anO totdt. It is clear to the Departnent that the ordin
states that the 'l earning center must be constructed jn
ioniunctton with and foi the primary use of llt" iearnincenter. From the uses proposed to date for the learing
center, only the Free Eirterprise Center seems to have
a direct re1 ationship to the hotel . The Department con
that this tie must bb stronger to have this area functi
proposed under the ordinance.
is that the site is
s discussed through
even better.
provided on thevity. |rle feel onthere shou'l d
The pathways. andof the site and the
ional amenities. I,le
shoul d al so be incl uded
wel I pl anned.our comments' we
The Community Development Department recommends ap_proval of the
proposal subject to the conditions noted below. The concerns
irnd'pol icy questions raised in this memorandum need to be-
iaOrbiseA-Uy ttre planning and Envjronmental Comrnission. A
maior concein of the Department is the amount and types- -of deve'l opment on this 'site. The squa.re feet of commercia'l
space proiosed has not been iustified. There seems to be
iiiUituirttirlty more commericai space proposed.than needed
ior a 150 robm hotel , eondominiirms, sal es units, and rental
un.i ts along with a learning center and recereatjon facility.
In addition the types bf commercia'l uses within Mansfield
Vi'llage should oniy be complimentary to,Uut:!ield Vil1"S9'
The D6partment rec6mmends no more than .l0,000 square feet
of commerc i a'l type u se s .
her
an ce
s
s i derson as
The Department also recommends that the 8,000 square feet
iijnteiLnce facil ity of the hotel not be constructed. Mul ti-
use of the learning center area would be a positive aspect
in reinforcing the center.
'-G'
Memo to PEC
5-'18-79
t Page Eight-Mansfie'ld Village
specifica'l 'l y, we would request the followin,g information and
rbvisionsas i condition of this recommended approval: '
I . ) Revj sed pl ans showing the reduced amount of commercia't
Square Footage. i
2.) More specific information on the proposed users 0f the
Learning Center SPace
3.) A more detailed description of the re'lationship of the
hotel to the 'l earning center. '
4. ) A Devel opment Schedul e
5.) Dedication .of Stream Tract and Easement for Bicycle Path
6.) Two points of access, left hand-turni19 1ane, and an
acceieration and dece't'leration'l ane along Frontage Road
7.) An offset sideuralk along Frontage Road
8. ) An outside Recreationa'l Area
( 9.) A driveway permit from the State Highway Department
10.) A Bus Shelter and Turnaround, with the design to be approved
by the staff.
I t . ) Sati sfactory access to the excl uded I ot '
I
'rll'f,
ffG.N.SEME IIIO.ODHOIISEpaililrEt e urcan ctesign consultant
P.O.WX265,UA|L,
coLoEADO 81657
PHONE 3o3 476 @40
October 12t I97B
Mr. A1len Gerstenb:erger,
Director of Communitv Deve fopment
Town of Vai-1
Box 100
vail, co 81657
Dear Al-len:
Following our meetj-ng on October 5, I would l-ike to outline how we can
irnprove the approval process and better illustrate the proposed deve lopment
of Area A, Special Development District 4.
The approval procedure as outlined in the zoning ordinance for SD4 is a
one step process with many illustratj.ve aids and relatively detailecl design
necessary for Lhe submittal package. It is not our intention to eliminate
any work, as it is necessary and within our own interests for this kind of
development, to carry out sufficient design and to illustrate it extensively,
We do believe however that it is in everyones interest to break the process
up into a two step process so that Less detailed design work is done during
the initial stages.
The contents for the Development Plan as outlined in chapter 18.46. Sec. 040
seem to be intended for the whole of SD4. Area A is substantially different
from the remainder of the district therefore the Development Plan should
contain different information. For instance a model at a seale of no
smaller than I inch = 100 feet and an architectural model of each buililingr,protraying design details are called for. It would seem more appropriate
for Area A during the initial design stage and durinq the Planning Conmission
and Town Council approval process to ilfustrate the project with one model at
a scale and extent of detail somewhere between the above two models so that
building relationships, massing, visual impact, pedestrian spaces and overall
appearance is illustratecl and is appropriate for us as a massing study design
tool .
J.
Mr. AIIen Gerstenberger
October 12, 1978
Page Two
The overall environnental impact report for SD4 as required by Chapter 1-8.46
Sec. 040 Para. A, prepared by The John Ryan Company and THK Associates in
L977 dealt with the entire SD4 and covered maximum density for Area A. As
we will be proposing lesser density than discussed in this EIR, \,/e requestthat submittal of the "supplementaf environmental impact report" as requiredby Chapter 18.46 Sec. 040 Para. 81 be waived.
We request that the contents of the Development plan as required in Chapter
l-8.46 Sec. 040 for Area A,SD4 consist of the followinq:
1 Existlng contours having contour intervals of not more than two feet.
A conceptual site plan, at a scale not smaller than one inch equals 50feet, showing the locations of all buildings and structures, and allprincipal devel-opment features such as landscapeil areas, recreationalfacilities, pedestrian plazas and walkways, service entries, driveways
and off street and loading areas.
A corrceptual landscape plan, at a scale not smaller than one inch equals
fifty feet, showing existingr landscape features to be retained or removed
and showing proposed landscaping and lantlscapeil site development features,
such as outdoor recreational facilities, bicycle pathsr trails, pedestrian
plazas and walkways. water features and othe r elements.
Sections through the development at a scal-e not smaller than one inch
equals twenty feet illustrating the roug'h grading, building relationships,
and building heights.
Typical unit floor plans in sufficient detail to determine floor area and
gross residential floor area.
7. A volumetric mode I of the site and the proposed development at a scale notsmaller than one inch equals twenty feet, protrayinq the scale andrelationships of the proposed development to the site and illustrating theform and mass of the proposed buildings.
8. Perspective sketches from eye level in the proposed streets illustrating the
basic feeling of the developnent, the spaces buildings are containing and
the scale of the development.
A proposal regarding the dedication t'o the tol,m or private ownership
and maintenance of that portion of the deve lopment area within the one
hundred year floodplain of Gore Creek. In the event the one hund.redyear floodplain is not dedicated to the town, such lands shall be subject
to a right of public access to Gore Creek, and the right to use a portion
of the lands for a bicycle pathr and for park purposes, provided that
the location and use of the facilities and access shal1 be determined by
mutual agreement between the town and the owner of the development areas
involved.
3.
o
Mr. Al1en Gerstenberser
October L2, 7978
Page Three
The a]rove drawings and illustrative material would be the complete packaqefor presentation to the Planning Conunission and To\,rn Council,
Once the approvals have been obtained more detailed design will continue and
be presented to Community Deve lopnent staff and the Design Revie\^r Corrunitteefor their approval. These material-s will be submitted in accordance with
Chapter 18.54 Section 05O of the Zoning Ordinance which outlines the materials
needed for Design Review approval.
This final submittal to the Design Review Committee will be done as each phase
of the development is designed and developed.
If this approach and these presentation materials meet with your approval please
advise us-
Sincerely yours,
GJW,/S